LC
Laura Capps
Supervisor, District 2
Nonpartisan officeElected
139meetings
138attended
109spoke in
4462speaking turns
1bodies
149votes

Service

TermFromToRecord
Supervisor, District 2
Santa Barbara County, Board of Supervisors
December 6, 2022serving

Board of Supervisors

How they voted 2
How they voted 1
Aye
A-27) 26-00380 Consider recommendations regarding a Public Works Director's Report on Emergency Response Actions from Impacts on Flooding and Storms and Continuation of Emergency Actions for the Transportation Division, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Receive and review a report from the Public Works Director regarding emergency actions taken pursuant to Resolution No. 19-327 and Public Contract Code section 22050 related to emergency operations responding to flooding, storms, debris removal and transportation projects following the recent late December 2025 and early January 2026 (25STM3) storm events and the necessity of the action and the reasons the emergency will not permit delay resulting from competitive solicitation of bids; b) Determine that there is a need to continue the emergency actions ordered by the Public Works Director; c) Direct staff to return to the Board at the next regular meeting, or every 14 days in the case of consecutive weekly regular meetings, to allow the Board to review the emergency action and determine whether there is a need to continue the emergency action, by a 4/5 vote, until the actions are terminated; andd) Determine that these emergency actions were found by the Board to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(d) and Section 15301(c) on January 13, 2026. A Notice of Exemption was filed on this basis on January 7, 2026, and the proposed action is within the scope of that Notice of Exemption.Passed · 4–0
2026-04-21Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
How they voted 2
Aye
8) 26-00192 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding time extension requests for the installation of multi-technology carbon filtration for cannabis odor control, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) CP1 Supply Systems Inc / 4505 Foothill Road, Case No. 25TEX-00026:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00026; b) Emmawood B1 LLC / 5888 Via Real, Case No. 25TEX-00027:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00027:c) Valley Crest Farms / 5980 Casitas Pass, Case No. 26TEX-00001:i) Make the required findings for denial;ii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270, determine that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves; iii) Deny the time extension request, Case No. 26TEX-00001:d) CKC Farms, Inc. and Life Remedy Farms, Inc. / 5138 Foothill Road, Case No. 26TEX-00002:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00002;e) Bosim 1628 Management Company LLC / 1628 Cravens Ln, Case No. 26TEX-00003:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00003;f) New Generation Farms, Inc. and Blue Whale Agriculture, Inc. / 5775 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00004:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00004;g) Primetime Farms, Inc. / 5554 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00005: i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00005; andh) G and K Produce / K and G Flowers / 3480 Via Real, Case No. 26TEX-00006:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00006.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
How they voted 4
Aye
A-10) 26-00116 Consider recommendations regarding the North Branch Jail Expansion Project - Award Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Construction Management (CM); Project No. 23040, Fifth District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with STV Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, to provide CM services during the design competition and selection, design-build entity design and construction, closeout, and post construction phases for the proposed new North Branch Jail Expansion project, located at 2301 Black Road, Santa Maria, CA 93455 (APN 113-210-022/024), in an amount not to exceed $5,072,320.00; b) Authorize the Director of General Services, or his Assistant Director or Capital Division Chief designee, to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5% or $253,616.00 as authorized under California Public Contract Code Section 20142(b); c) Authorize the Director of General Services to (i) amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement by up to six (6) additional months, and (ii) terminate the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement; d) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010960; ande) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 5–0
How they voted 6
Aye
A-20) 26-00057 Consider recommendations regarding the California Coastal Commission Conditional Certification of the Local Coastal Program Amendment for Rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, as follows:a) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's certification of the Coastal Land Use Plan amendment (Resolution No. 24-93) of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);b) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209), zoning map and zoning text, respectively, of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);c) Adopt a Resolution acknowledging receipt of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209) with suggested modifications, accepting and agreeing to the suggested modifications, agreeing to issue Coastal Development Permits for the total area included in the conditionally certified Local Coastal Program, and adopting the Local Coastal Program amendment with the suggested modifications; d) Determine that the Board of Supervisors' action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15265; ande) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted resolution to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission.Passed · 5–0
2025-12-16Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
2025-12-09Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
How they voted 2
How they voted 2
How they voted 2
Aye
A-20) 25-00830 Consider recommendations regarding Management Classification and Compensation Refinement, as follows: a) Adopt an amendment to the Salary Resolution to revise the County of Santa Barbara’s Classification and Salary Plan Section 2 - to establish additional management classifications and salary ranges and delete unused management classifications; revise Section 3 - Salary Schedules effective October 13, 2025; and revise Section 4 - Department Position Allocation consistent with the June 24, 2024 implementation of the management classification changes that allowed certain employees with existing civil service status to retain that status until leaving their current position; b) Adopt the Resolution which amends the Compensation and Benefits Plan for Management, Appointed Executive, and Confidential Unrepresented Employees (Resolution No. 24-187) previously approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2024, and amended June 16, 2024, July 16, 2024, and August 27, 2024; c) Authorize the Human Resources Director to apply Management General Salary Increases in 2026 and subsequent years, up to a maximum of 1.5% annually, to employees who will be Y-rated as a result of their placement in the revised classification structure on October 13, 2025 (item (a) above), as an exception to general Y-rating rules; and d) Determine that the above actions are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) since the recommended actions are government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 2
How they voted 3
2025-07-15Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 2
How they voted 2
Aye
5) 25-00382 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Environmental Health Services Fees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding Environmental Health Services' Fee Schedule Resolutions and Ordinances; b) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Public Swimming Pools;c) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, Pumping, Maintenance and Disposal Services, Sewage Violation Inspections, and Land Development Review Services; d) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Organized Camps and Housing Complaint Inspections;e) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Body Art;f) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Public Water Systems (California Safe Drinking Water Act);g) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Water Wells and Private Water Systems;h) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste;i) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Monitoring Wells and Borings;j) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Site Mitigation;k) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA);l) Read the titles of the above Ordinances amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste, Monitoring Wells and Borings, Site Mitigation, and Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) into the record and waive full reading of these Ordinances; m) Find that approval of the recommended actions a) - l) is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and (B) because the fees will be used for operating expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 because the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a "Project" as defined for purposes of CEQA, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis. n) Continue the hearing on Environmental Health Services' Fee Ordinances to the Administrative Agenda of June 3, 2025, to consider recommendations, as follows:i) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste; ii) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Monitoring Wells and Borings; iii) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Site Mitigation;iv) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA);v) Find that approval of the above recommended actions i-iv is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and (B) because the fees will be used for operating expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 because the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a "Project" as defined for purposes of CEQA, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
2025-05-06Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
2025-04-14Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 1
How they voted 1
—
4) 25-00266 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on current renovations at the Main Jail and potential expansion of the Northern Branch Jail (NBJ), as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.) a) Receive an update on renovations at the Main Jail and options for new construction at the NBJ; b) Regarding the NBJ: i) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1 (new construction of one housing unit for a total jail system of 748 beds) and issue a Request for Quotation (RFQ) to select potential Design Build teams; or ii) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 housing units for a total jail system of 876 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; or iii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 housing units for a total jail system of 1,004 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; c) Approve and authorize staff to develop funding strategies to address the operational and debt service budgetary impacts for the selected option; d) Approve and authorize staff to negotiate an amendment to the existing ground lease boundary at the NBJ with the State of California; e) Approve and authorize the County Executive Office to work with the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office, County Counsel and Auditor-Controller’s Office to develop feasible debt issuance strategies; f) Provide other direction as appropriate; and g) Find that these actions are not a "project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because they consist of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and exempt from the provisions of the CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–2
How they voted 3
2025-02-25Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 2
—
A-11) 25-00112 Consider recommendations regarding an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and American Medical Response West (AMR), as follows:a) Repeal Ordinance 5182 that rescinded and replaced Chapter 5 of the Santa Barbara County Code (Ambulances) on June 20, 2023, which will nullify the actions to approve the permit for the Fire District and deny the permit for AMR taken thereunder;b) Approve the introduction (first reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services;c) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Agreement with AMR to provide ambulance services for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area with an annual cost reimbursement to the County in the amount of up to $3,989,831.00 for performance period of February 11, 2025 through February 10, 2029. If the County or AMR does not provide written notice of withdrawal six (6) months before the end of the applicable term the Agreement will automatically renew for one (1) year terms not to exceed beyond February 10, 2033; e) Approve and authorize the Director of the Public Health Department and the Local Emergency Medical Services Authority to make immaterial changes such as correcting clerical errors and updating contact information, upon review and concurrence by the Offices of the County Executive, County Counsel, and Auditor-Controller, as may be applicable;f) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; and g) Continue the item to the Administrative Agenda of March 4, 2025 to consider adoption of the Ordinance, as follows:i) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services; and ii) Determine that the above recommended action is not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the action is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 0–1
Aye
3) 25-00089 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Montecito Land Use and Development Code (MLUDC), County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), Article II, Coastal Zoning Ordinance, and associated Comprehensive Plan amendments to adopt updated Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance amendments (Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, 24ORD-00003, 24GPA-00001, and 24GPA-00002), as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Case Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, and the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003;b) Determine that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003, and the design guidelines amendments are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15265;c) Approve the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments by taking the following actions:i) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the County LUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00001), Section 35-1 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;ii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the MLUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00002), Section 35-2 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; andiii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the Article II Coastal Zoning Ordinance (Case No. 24ORD-00003) of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;d) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00001, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-1.10, amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-3.1, and delete Attachment H, of the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan;ii) Amend Development Standard VIS-LA-1.2.3 of the Los Alamos Community Plan; andiii) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan;e) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00002, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Coastal Land Use Plan in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan; f) Adopt a Resolution revising the Old Town Orcutt Design Guidelines and the Los Alamos Bell Street Design Guidelines for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments; g) Adopt a Resolution revising the Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments;h) Adopt a Resolution authorizing Planning and Development to submit the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards amendments (Case No. 24ORD-00003, Case No. 24GPA-00002) to the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for review and certification as an amendment to the Santa Barbara County Local Coastal Program; andi) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted Resolution to the Executive Director of the CCC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2025-01-14Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 2
2024-12-10Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
2024-11-05Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 9
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
—
A-22) 24-00977 Consider recommendations regarding an Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Project, County Project No. 864052, Second District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. (not a local vendor), in an amount not to exceed $424,505.00, to provide professional design and engineering services for the Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Design; b) Approve and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to, in accordance with the Agreement: extend the period of performance for up to one additional year (Section 4.B); make immaterial amendments (Section 34); suspend performance (Section 46.); and to approve amendments to the Agreement in an amount not to exceed 10% of the initial contract amount, $42,450.00, for a total contract authorization of $466,955.00; c) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010054 to increase appropriations of $446,955.00 in Public Works Roads-Capital Infrastructure for Services and Supplies funded by a Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Measure A Grant and Public Works Roads Measure A Fund; and d) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 1–0
How they voted 2
2024-08-27Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 7
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
How they voted 2
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
How they voted 2
How they voted 1
—
7) 24-00639 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Tax on Cannabis Operations Ordinance, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County:i) Option 1 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed, as follows: Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at twenty-five cents ($0.25) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at two and a half cents ($0.025) per quarter, per square foot; orii) Option 2 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed as follows:Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at fifty cents ($0.50) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at ten cents ($0.10) per quarter, per square foot;b) Read the title, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 50A, Tax on Cannabis Operations, of the Santa Barbara County Code," and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Approve the appointment and authorize member(s) of the Board of Supervisors to author, sign, and submit on behalf of the Board an argument in favor of the Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" ballot measure and any rebuttal; d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Set a hearing on the Agenda of July 9, 2024 to consider the following actions: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County; ii) Adopt a Resolution submitting the proposed Ordinance and ballot language to change the tax on cannabis cultivation to the electorate for approval, and requesting and ordering consolidation with the November 5, 2024 General Election; and iii) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 24-00575 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Recommended Budget Hearings, as follows:Acting concurrently as the Board of Supervisors; the Board of Directors, Fire Protection District, Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District; Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District; Board of Directors, Water Agency; and other special districts under the supervision and control of the Board of Supervisors:a) Receive, consider, and file the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, which includes the County's General Operating Budget as well as budgets of special districts governed by the Board of Supervisors;b) Approve final budget adjustments to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;c) Adopt a Resolution entitled In the Matter of Adopting the Budget for FY 2024-2025; d) Approve budget adjustments, if any, as amended during Budget Hearings, to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;e) Delegate authority to the Chair of the Board to execute single-year renewals of grants and contracts previously approved by the Board and included in the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, where contract amounts are within 10% of previously contracted amounts;f) Receive the draft salary resolution, direct any specific changes made during the June 2024 budget hearings, and adopt that amended salary resolution to be effective June 24, 2024, which updates job classifications and department position allocations to include positions approved by the Board of Supervisors during the FY 2024-2025 Budget Hearings;g) Adopt position changes previously approved by the County Executive Officer during FY 2023-2024 under Board Resolution 99-486; andh) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above fiscal activities are not a project subject to CEQA.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
2024-05-03Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
2024-04-10Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
2024-04-03Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 5
Aye
Pledge of AllegiancePassed · 5–0
Aye
1) 24-00010 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding reports on Pavement Impact Studies related to: Utility Cuts, Heavy Vehicles (Refuse Collection Trucks, Mass Transit/Bus, Fire Trucks and Construction Vehicles) and Consider Options for Pavement Impact Mitigation, as follows:a) Receive and file reports on Pavement Impact Studies on Roads related to utility cuts and heavy vehicles (refuse collection trucks, mass transit/bus, fire trucks and construction vehicles);b) Provide direction to Public Works staff on whether to pursue each of the following Pavement Impact cost recovery measures:i) Direct staff to implement a Pavement Cut Fee increase;ii) Direct staff to implement a new Heavy Construction Load Development Impact Fee; iii) Direct staff to work with Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division to investigate the feasibility of increasing the Solid Waste Program Fee to include compensation to the County for Heavy Load Road Impacts; iv) Direct staff to work with the County Executive Office to explore a budget expansion request or other options for offsetting costs of pavement impacts caused by Mass Transit/Bus and Fire Trucks; orc) Provide other direction, as appropriate; andd) Determine that the recommended action is not a Project within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the action is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: WITHDRAWVote recorded · 2–0
Aye
2) 24-00187 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the amendment of County Code Chapter 28, for use of County Rights-of-Way for business purposes, as follows:a) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 28-Roads, to allow permitting, regulation, and collection of fees for business operations encroaching on County road right-of-way;b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Set a hearing for the Administrative Agenda (Second Reading) to consider the adoption of an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 28, as follows: i) Approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 28-Roads, to allow permitting, regulation, and collection of fees for business operations encroaching in the County road right-of-way; andii) Determine that this action is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (c), as the proposed project(s) consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing, including but not limited to existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 4/23/2024Passed · 4–0
2024-03-12Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
MotionPassed · 4–1
How they voted 1
Aye
MotionPassed · 4–1
How they voted 1
Aye
A-13) 23-00842 Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows:a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andb) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:i) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; andii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 2
—
2) 23-00798 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant (Pacific Pipeline Company) appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment, Case Nos. 23APL-00022; 21AMD-00000-00009 & 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST TIME: 1 HR. 45 MIN.)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C-1, C-2, and D of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report (Included in Attachment 2 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) [Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 to the Board Letter).Or, alternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 (included as Attachment 3 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) including CEQA findings; and d) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–1
Aye
2) 23-00798 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant (Pacific Pipeline Company) appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment, Case Nos. 23APL-00022; 21AMD-00000-00009 & 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST TIME: 1 HR. 45 MIN.)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C-1, C-2, and D of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report (Included in Attachment 2 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) [Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 to the Board Letter).Or, alternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 (included as Attachment 3 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) including CEQA findings; and d) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
2023-07-19Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-1) 23-00742 Consider recommendations regarding the 2023 Homekey Program Application, First District, as follows: a) Approve a no-interest loan to The Turner Foundation - Since 1958 (The Turner Foundation) in the amount of $90,000.00 from the First District, 990 Fund 0001 (Loan) for use as an earnest money deposit for the acquisition of that certain real property located at 2011 Oak Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (Project) using Round 3 Homekey Program grant funding from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (Homekey Funding), which Loan is to be memorialized, and subject to terms and conditions set forth, in a Promissory Note (Promissory Note), and subject to immediate repayment in the event that (i) The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding is not granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, or (ii) The Turner Foundation fails to duly execute and record, as appropriate, loan documents approved by the Board of Supervisors memorializing a loan by the County to The Turner Foundation of Homekey matching funds, including a loan agreement, promissory note, deed of trust, and regulatory agreement (Homekey Matching Loan Documents) within 30 days of The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding being granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, and which Homekey Matching Loan Documents include the Loan as amended to be subject to the terms and conditions of such Homekey Matching Loan Documents; b) Find that the foregoing recommended action constitutes the financing or assisting in the financing of the acquisition of real property to be owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation to carry out a program deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to meet the social needs of the population of the County pursuant to Government Code Section 26227; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed Project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness, and that the Project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4.Alternatively, that the Board of Supervisors:d) Approve a no-interest loan to The Turner Foundation - Since 1958 (The Turner Foundation) in the amount of $90,000.00 from the First District, 990 Fund 0001 (Loan) for use as an earnest money deposit for the acquisition of that certain real property located at 2011 Oak Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (Project) using Round 3 Homekey Program grant funding from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (Homekey Funding), which Loan is to be memorialized, and subject to terms and conditions set forth, in a loan agreement and promissory note in forms approved by each of the Community Services Director, County Counsel, County Risk Management, and the County Auditor-Controller (Loan Documents). This Loan is subject to immediate repayment in the event that (i) The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding is not granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, or (ii) The Turner Foundation fails to duly execute such Loan Documents by August 18, 2023, and (iii) authorize the Community Services Director to execute such Loan Documents; e) Find that the foregoing recommended action constitutes the financing or assisting in the financing of the acquisition of real property to be owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation to carry out a program deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to meet the social needs of the population of the County pursuant to Government Code Section 26227; andf) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed Project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness, and that the Project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 10
Aye
A-37) 23-00700 Set a hearing to consider the Applicant appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment and Coastal Development Permit, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows:(Set a Hearing for August 22, 2023. Time estimate: 2 hours)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval; orAlternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project by taking the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the appeal and project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 including CEQA findings; andd) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 23-00592 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending the Ordinance 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee";b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 8/22/2023Passed · 5–0
Aye
3) 23-00662 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing), as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file the Administration Reports summarizing the Proposed FY 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing); b) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan);c) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing);d) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list;e) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list; andf) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–1
How they voted 2
No
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 1–3
Aye
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
How they voted 8
Aye
4) 23-00217 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District Ordinance relative to service charges, connection charges, and trunk sewer fees and a Resolution relative to the collection of service charges on the tax roll; Fourth and Fifth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District:a) Receive and file with the Clerk of the Board the fixed charge report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024;b) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon, and Bradley-Solomon trunk sewer fees;c) Read title: "An Ordinance of the Laguna County Sanitation District Amending Ordinance No. 3130 Adopted November 19, 1979, Which Established Service Charges, Connection Charges, and Other Rules and Regulations as Amended by Ordinance No. 4142 Adopted December 9, 1993 Establishing Trunk Sewer Fees. This Amending Ordinance Changes the Annual Service Charge and Connection Charge for Single Family and Duplex Dwelling Units, Apartments, Condominiums, Trailer Spaces, Mobile Homes and Non-residential Development; and also Changes the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley-Solomon Trunk Sewer Fees," and waive reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Direct the Clerk to count and report the number of written protests and if no majority protest:i) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for May 16, 2023 to consider recommendations, as follows:1) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley Solomon trunk sewer fees;2) Consider the adoption of a Resolution authorizing the collection of said charges on the tax roll; and3) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are modifications of service charges, connection charges, and trunk line fees for the purposes of meeting operating and capital expenses, as well as for meeting financial reserve needs required to maintain services within this existing service area, and the modifications in charges and fees are not for the construction of capital projects for the expansion of the service system and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis; ore) If majority protest, take no action and provide direction to staff.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
How they voted 6
Aye
1) 23-00016 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Board of Supervisors' 2023 appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Adult and Aging Network;b) Area Agency on Aging (Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens);c) Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment (BEACON);d) Behavioral Wellness Commission;e) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Representative;f) CenCal Health;g) Child Care Planning Council;h) CommUnify (formerly Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County);i) Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Representative;j) Debt Advisory Committee;k) Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions;l) First Five Children and Families Commission of Santa Barbara County;m) Golden State Connect Authority (GSCA);n) Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA);o) Juvenile Justice Coordination Council;p) KIDS Network Policy Council;q) Law Library Board of Trustees;r) Legislative Program Committee;s) Library Advisory Committee;t) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO);u) Multi-jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force;v) National Association of Counties (NACO) Representative;w) Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board;x) Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System;y) Rural County Representative of California (RCRC); andz) Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
2022-12-21Meetingpresentno recording yet · from the board’s roll call
How they voted 10
—
3) 22-01129 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Ceres Farms Mixed-Light Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 22APL-000000-00028 and 19CDP-00000-00015, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) In order to grant the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the modified Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, (Attachment 1 of the Board Agenda Letter, dated December 1, 2022) including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2) (Attachments 3 and 4 of the Memo dated December 12, 2022); andd) Grant de novo approval of the modified Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 of the Memo dated December 12, 2022).; orAlternatively, in order to deny the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, including CEQA findings;c) Determine that the previously certified PEIR (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, subject to the conditions of approval, including Condition No. 37 (Odor Abatement Plan Revision), as conditioned by the Planning Commission.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
Aye
3) 22-01129 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Ceres Farms Mixed-Light Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 22APL-000000-00028 and 19CDP-00000-00015, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) In order to grant the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the modified Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, (Attachment 1 of the Board Agenda Letter, dated December 1, 2022) including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2) (Attachments 3 and 4 of the Memo dated December 12, 2022); andd) Grant de novo approval of the modified Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 of the Memo dated December 12, 2022).; orAlternatively, in order to deny the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, including CEQA findings;c) Determine that the previously certified PEIR (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00015, subject to the conditions of approval, including Condition No. 37 (Odor Abatement Plan Revision), as conditioned by the Planning Commission.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0