UnGovr Words

Board of Supervisors — 2023-05-16

Board of Supervisors — 2023-05-16May 16, 2023

Switch meeting
BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 May 16, 2023

Click any transcript line to jump the video there.

Meeting Summary

  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Present: Kaps, 4-Nelson, 5-Lavagnino, 3-Hartmann, Williams

This summary was AI-generated to save you time. It may miss or misstate details, so verify against the official recording and the transcript.

At a glance

CEO’s Report

  • The County Executive announced the appointment of Wade Horton as Assistant County Executive Officer.
  • The role is restructured to provide strategic direction to departments including planning, community services, and public works.
  • Mr. Horton previously served as County Administrative Officer and Public Works Director for San Luis Obispo County.

Agenda Announcements and Administrative Agenda Approval

  • The Clerk announced an addendum adding Administrative Items 41 and 42 and amending Departmental Item 8.
  • Administrative Item 3 was withdrawn at the department's request.
  • Administrative Items 25 and 34 were pulled for public comment.
  • The Board approved the administrative agenda with these modifications.

Administrative Item 25: Laguna County Sanitation District Ordinance and Resolution

  • The Board considered recommendations regarding service charges, connection charges, and trunk sewer fees for the 4th and 5th districts.
  • Staff explained that rate increases are funding a sewer plant replacement project that is currently on budget and on time.
  • The current year’s rate increase of 1.5% was set below the annual average CPI for 2022.
  • The Board approved Administrative Item 25.

Administrative Item 37: Resolution Honoring Dos Pueblos Mock Trial Team

  • The Board considered a resolution honoring the 2022–2023 Dos Pueblos Mock Trial team for their tournament achievements.
  • Team representatives and Deputy County Counsel Lisa Rothstein expressed gratitude for the recognition.
  • Supervisor Hartman noted the involvement of county legal professionals in coaching the team.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Administrative Item 34: Budget Hearings

  • The Board considered setting hearings to review the fiscal year 2023–2024 recommended budget.
  • Hearings are scheduled for June 16 and, if necessary, June 20, 2023.
  • A speaker who had requested to speak withdrew their comment.
  • The Board approved Administrative Item 34.

Administrative Item 38: Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

  • The Board considered a resolution proclaiming May 2023 as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.
  • Speakers discussed historical events, recent increases in anti-Asian hate incidents, and upcoming cultural events.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Administrative Item 39: National Peace Officers Week

  • The Board considered a resolution proclaiming the week of May 13–20, 2023, as National Peace Officers Week.
  • Undersheriff Craig Bonner highlighted the diverse roles of sheriff’s deputies, including patrol and jail operations.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Departmental Item 1: Temporary Development Standard Suspension Ordinance

  • Staff presented a request to extend temporary provisions in the Land Use and Development Code to October 31, 2024.
  • The extension supports economic recovery for businesses utilizing non-conforming structures and active permits.
  • Staff noted that no businesses in the coastal zone are currently utilizing these provisions.
  • The Board adopted staff’s recommendation.

Departmental Item 2: Amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance

  • Staff proposed amendments to achieve full cost recovery for staff time and resources dedicated to cannabis licensing.
  • The proposal includes significant increases to initial application and compliance management fees.
  • The Board approved the recommendation with a direction to further consider incorporating additional costs into future fee adjustments.

Departmental Item 3: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Santa Barbara County Counsel Department

  • KPMG presented a review of the County Counsel Department, which has 43 staff and a budget of $11.7 million.
  • Key recommendations included enhancing caseload tracking and establishing a coordinated data reporting framework for assessment appeals.
  • County Counsel Director Rachel Van Molen presented the department’s implementation plan for several recommendations.
  • The Board received and filed the report and approved staff recommendations A through C.

Departmental Item 4: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Community Services Department

  • KPMG presented a review of the Community Services Department, which has 96.75 FTE and a budget of over $81 million.
  • Recommendations included developing an activity-driven deployment model for Parks and establishing a countywide DEIA hub.
  • The Community Services Director presented the department’s response to the recommendations.
  • The Board approved staff recommendations A through C.

Departmental Item 5: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Public Health Department

  • KPMG presented a review of the Public Health Department, which has over 530 employees and a budget of over $100 million.
  • Recommendations included optimizing health center scheduling and developing an integrated data hub for cross-agency client data sharing.
  • The Public Health Director noted the department is already implementing several recommendations, including using the EPIC electronic health record.
  • The Board approved staff’s recommendation.

Departmental Item 6: Probation Department – FY 2023-2024 Public Safety Realignment Plan

  • Staff presented the FY 2023-2024 Public Safety Realignment Plan addendum, covering population demographics and fund allocation.
  • Program updates included the Familiar Faces Street Outreach Team and expansion of co-response teams to Lompoc.
  • The plan includes an ongoing AB 109 program budget of $20.1 million and an additional $226,000 for pilot activities.
  • The Board approved staff’s recommendations A through D.

Departmental Item 7: County Executive Office and General Services – Jail Renovations and Construction

  • Staff presented conceptual options for renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail and potential construction at the Northern Branch Jail.
  • Three expansion options for the Northern Branch Jail were presented, ranging from one pod to two pods with varying costs and timelines.
  • Staff recommended Option 1 (One Pod) as the best long-term strategy, aligning funding with staffing capacity and population needs.
  • The Board directed staff to proceed with Option A, B, and C1 (design for one pod) and to return within one year to assess diversion progress.

Departmental Item 8: Dignity Moves / La Posada LLC Ground Lease and Development Agreement

  • Staff recommended executing a ground lease for a temporary interim supportive housing project at 4500 Hollister Avenue.
  • The project will provide up to 90 modular housing cabins for individuals experiencing unsheltered homelessness.
  • Good Samaritan Shelter will serve as the operator, providing 24/7 staffing, security, and case management services.
  • The Board adopted the staff recommendation for departmental item 8, sections A through F.

Closed Session

  • The Board authorized County Counsel to seek appellate review of the superior court decision in Anderson v. County of Santa Barbara.
  • The Board reappointed Rachel Van Molen as County Counsel.

Full summary

Meeting Opening and Roll Call

  • The May 16th meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors was called to order. The Clerk of the Board called the roll, and all supervisors were present. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

Approval of Minutes (May 9th Meeting)

  • A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes from the May 9th meeting. The motion passed.

CEO’s Report

  • The County Executive announced the appointment of Wade Horton as Assistant County Executive Officer. The role is restructured to provide strategic direction to departments including planning, community services, public works, general services, and the Ag Commissioner. Mr. Horton previously served as County Administrative Officer for San Luis Obispo County and as its Public Works Director.

Agenda Announcements and Administrative Agenda Approval

  • The Clerk announced an addendum posted on May 12th, adding Administrative Items 41 and 42 and amending Departmental Item 8.
  • Administrative Item 41: Appointment of Brian Caird to the Agricultural Advisory Committee.
  • Administrative Item 42: Reappointment of Dave Davis to the Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District Board of Directors.
  • Departmental Item 8: Amendment to authorize the Community Services Director (rather than the General Services Director) to execute a subrecipient agreement for the Dignity Moves La Posada LLC project.
  • Withdrawal: The department requested the withdrawal of Administrative Item 3 (Behavioral Wellness IDEA Engineering Inc. agreement for FY 2022–2024).
  • Public Pulls: Requests were received to pull Administrative Items 25 and 34 for public comment.
  • A motion was made and seconded to approve the administrative agenda with the inclusion of Items 41 and 42, the withdrawal of Item 3, and the exception of Items 25 and 34 which were pulled for public comment. The motion passed.

Administrative Item 25: Laguna County Sanitation District Ordinance and Resolution

  • The Board considered recommendations regarding the Laguna County Sanitation District ordinance relative to service charges, connection charges, and trunk sewer fees, and a resolution regarding the collection of service charges on the tax roll. This affects the 4th and 5th districts.
  • Public Comment: A speaker raised concerns regarding construction cost increases for a new sewer plant, alleging that costs had risen from an estimated $40 million to $53 million and that these costs were being converted into permanent property taxes. The speaker requested updated accounting and argued that construction costs should be separated from recurring taxes. Another resident raised concerns unrelated to the sanitation district, including the termination of a waste management contract by park management, charges for sewer repairs, and allegations of conflict of interest regarding park management. Supervisor Nelson directed the speaker to submit written materials to his office for review.
  • Staff Response: Staff explained that the 2010 master plan identified the need for plant replacement. Rate increases over five years were implemented to fund the upgrade. Bids came in at $53 million, but the project is currently on budget and on time for completion in early 2024. The rate structure is based on a 20-year pro forma covering replacement, operation, maintenance, and construction costs. The current year’s rate increase of 1.5% was set below the 7% annual average CPI for 2022. Staff noted that combined water and sewer rates are comparable to other jurisdictions in the county.
  • Decision: A motion was made and seconded to approve Administrative Item 25. The motion passed.

Administrative Item 37: Resolution Honoring Dos Pueblos Mock Trial Team

  • The Board considered the adoption of a resolution honoring the 2022–2023 Dos Pueblos Mock Trial team for their achievements, including placing third at the Empire Mock Trial Tournament, first in the Santa Barbara County Championship, and second at the California Mock Trial Finals. Team representatives and Deputy County Counsel Lisa Rothstein expressed gratitude for the recognition. Supervisor Hartman noted the involvement of county legal professionals in coaching the team. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Administrative Item 34: Budget Hearings

  • The Board considered setting hearings to review recommendations regarding the fiscal year 2023–2024 recommended budget for the County of Santa Barbara and the former County of Santa Barbara redevelopment agency. Hearings are scheduled for June 16 and, if necessary, June 20, 2023. A speaker who had requested to speak withdrew their comment. A motion was made and seconded to approve Administrative Item 34. The motion passed.

Administrative Item 38: Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

  • The Board considered the adoption of a resolution proclaiming May 2023 as Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month in Santa Barbara County. Representatives from the Santa Barbara AAPI Solidarity Network, the Asian American Affinity Committee, and the Asian American Association of Santa Barbara County spoke. Comments included recognition of AAPI contributions to the county, discussion of historical events such as the Chinese Exclusion Act and Japanese American incarceration, and concerns regarding recent increases in anti-Asian hate incidents and discriminatory legislation. Speakers also highlighted upcoming cultural events and exhibits. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Administrative Item 39: National Peace Officers Week

  • The Board considered the adoption of a resolution proclaiming the week of May 13–20, 2023, as National Peace Officers Week in Santa Barbara County. Undersheriff Craig Bonner thanked the Board for the recognition and highlighted the diverse roles of sheriff’s deputies, including patrol, investigation, court protection, jail operations, and dispatch. The resolution was passed and adopted.

General Public Comment

  • The Board allocated 30 minutes for general public comment. Twenty speakers requested to speak.
  • Housing and Evictions: Multiple speakers addressed the eviction notices issued by Core Spaces at the CBC in the Sweeps apartment complex in Isla Vista. Speakers cited the lack of permits for construction, the low vacancy rate (under 1%), and the potential displacement of approximately 1,000 residents. Requests included a moratorium on rent evictions and no-fault evictions, a right to re-rent or return to units at the same or similar rent, a requirement for one-year leases, and an investigation into Core Spaces’ actions and permit status. Speakers referenced legal precedents in Los Angeles and San Diego for such measures.
  • Other Topics: One speaker discussed "Agenda 21" and population control theories. Another speaker raised concerns about risk management and allegations of corruption.
  • Board Response: Supervisor Kaps thanked the advocates and directed staff to investigate the permit status and construction activity at the CBC in the Sweeps. Supervisor Hartman asked about the county’s legal authority to pass ordinances regarding the right of return, noting that the state legislature is also considering related bills. Supervisor Nelson stated that the Board has requested analyses on moratoriums, right-to-return provisions, and lease requirements, and that they are reviewing non-emergency legal precedents from other jurisdictions. The Board expressed appreciation for the advocacy and acknowledged the urgency of the housing crisis.

Departmental Item 1: Temporary Development Standard Suspension Ordinance

  • Staff presented a request to extend temporary provisions in the Land Use and Development Code to October 31, 2024. The presentation clarified that these changes apply only to unincorporated areas under the Land Use and Development Code, excluding the Coastal Zoning Ordinance and the Montecito Land Use Development Code. The purpose is to support economic recovery for businesses utilizing these provisions, such as wineries and restaurants, by allowing continued operation of non-conforming structures and active permits. Staff noted that the County is currently working with the Department of Public Works on ordinances related to parklets, which will coordinate with these zoning provisions. Supervisor Nelson inquired about the status of parklet regulations; staff indicated that the Chapter 28 ordinance update regarding parklets is anticipated later in the summer. Supervisor Nelson also asked if any businesses in the coastal zone were currently using these provisions; staff stated that, to their knowledge, no businesses in the coastal zone are currently utilizing them, and the Coastal Commission has indicated it will no longer grant waivers for coastal zone amendments during emergencies. Supervisor Nelson requested that staff verify this information again. No public comment was received. Supervisor Hartman moved to adopt staff’s recommendation, which was seconded by Supervisor Nelson. The motion passed.

Departmental Item 2: Amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance

  • Staff presented proposed amendments to the Cannabis Business License Fee Ordinance to achieve full cost recovery for staff time and resources dedicated to cannabis licensing. The proposal includes significant increases to initial application fees (ranging from $5,518 to $10,450) and compliance management fees (ranging from $4,031 to $6,327), while renewal fees see slight decreases or remain similar depending on license type and location. Staff explained that the fee structure is based on data collected from 2018 to 2022, updated for current salaries, benefits, and indirect costs. The fees are designed to cover the time of two dedicated cannabis business license specialists and other departmental staff involved in licensing and compliance. Supervisor Hartman asked about the inclusion of costs for the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office and the California Cannabis Authority (CCA) track-and-trace data access, noting that these are currently funded by cannabis tax revenues rather than fees. Staff explained that the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s staff are directly funded by cannabis revenues and are not included in the fee structure, while the CCA membership fee (approximately $500,000) is also currently paid from general funds or cannabis revenues. Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Capps expressed the view that these costs should be incorporated into the fee structure to ensure full cost recovery. Supervisor Nelson asked about the allocation of Sheriff’s Department costs, clarifying that enforcement activities are paid for by cannabis revenues, while compliance and licensing-related duties are covered by fees. Supervisor Nelson proposed moving forward with the current fee proposal but directing staff to return with a plan to incorporate additional costs, such as the CCA fee, into future fee adjustments. Supervisor Hartman moved to approve staff’s recommendation with the direction to further consider additional costs for future fee adjustments, which was seconded by the Clerk of the Board. No public comment was received. The motion passed.

Departmental Item 3: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Santa Barbara County Counsel Department

  • KPMG presented the operational performance review of the County Counsel Department, which has 43 staff and a budget of $11.7 million. The review included eight recommendations across three focus areas: staffing analysis, operational review, and assessment appeals. Key recommendations included enhancing caseload and activity tracking, improving data tracking and reporting for case outcomes, and establishing a coordinated data reporting framework for assessment appeals involving the County Counsel, Assessor, and Clerk of the Board. County Counsel Director Rachel Van Molen presented the department’s implementation plan, noting that the department had already taken steps to address several recommendations, including creating a new non-attorney management position (Operations Support Manager) to handle administrative tasks previously performed by attorneys, developing training schedules, and implementing debrief processes. Regarding assessment appeals, the department reported working with the Assessor and Clerk to develop internal thresholds for case assistance, using shared platforms for information sharing, and updating the Clerk’s database to track additional case data. Supervisor Hartman, Supervisor Nelson, and Supervisor Nowak commented on the department’s proactive approach to implementing the recommendations. No public comment was received. Supervisor Hartman moved to receive and file the report and approve staff recommendations A through C, which was seconded. The motion passed.

Departmental Item 4: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Community Services Department

  • KPMG presented the operational performance review of the Community Services Department, which has 96.75 FTE and a budget of over $81 million. The review included 18 recommendations across five focus areas. Key recommendations highlighted included developing an activity-driven deployment model for Parks and Open Spaces to align staffing with demand, conducting a comprehensive countywide needs assessment for Housing and Community Development in collaboration with other health and human services agencies, and establishing a countywide Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) hub led by the CEO’s office. Community Services Director Chaffetzsche presented the department’s response, stating that the Parks Division is evaluating software to assist in managing staff activity levels, the Housing and Community Development Division is already working with the CEO’s office on a homelessness needs assessment, and the department supports the establishment of a countywide DEIA hub. Supervisor Hartman commented on the department’s management of new pressures and programs. No public comment was received. Supervisor Nelson moved to approve staff recommendations A through C, which was seconded by Supervisor Hartman. The motion passed.

Departmental Item 5: KPMG Operational Performance Review of the Public Health Department

  • KPMG presented the operational performance review of the Public Health Department, which has over 530 employees and a budget of over $100 million. The review included 13 recommendations across four focus areas. Key recommendations highlighted included optimizing scheduling and staff utilization in health centers, developing an integrated data hub for cross-agency client data sharing to support CalAIM, enhancing reporting and analysis in the Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division, and developing a strategic plan and performance measures for Animal Services. Public Health Director Hamami presented the department’s response, noting that the department is already implementing several recommendations, including using the EPIC electronic health record for better scheduling and care coordination, developing Power BI dashboards for disease prevention, and working on a strategic plan for Animal Services with monthly KPI reporting. The department also indicated readiness to conduct a new fee study for Animal Services by the end of the year. Supervisor Hartman asked about the status of the Animal Services strategic plan and advisory committees; the Director explained that the strategic plan is in the implementation phase and that the department is considering combining two advisory groups. Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Capps commented on the work of the new Animal Services Director. Supervisor Capps highlighted the importance of language access and bilingual services in Environmental Health. No public comment was received. Supervisor Hartman moved to approve staff’s recommendation, which was seconded. The motion passed.

Departmental Item 6: Probation Department – FY 2023-2024 Public Safety Realignment Plan

  • Chief Probation Officer Holly Benton and Acting Deputy Chief Spencer Cross presented the FY 2023-2024 Public Safety Realignment Plan addendum. The presentation covered the current population demographics, noting that the realigned population comprises 15% of the overall supervised population but has higher recidivism rates compared to standard probationers. The plan outlines a balanced allocation of funds across jail population management, community supervision, treatment programs, housing, and innovations.
  • Key program updates included:
  • Familiar Faces Street Outreach Team: A reimagined program using redirected funding to conduct daily outreach to high-utilizers of services, particularly those with mental health challenges.
  • Co-Response Team Expansion: Addition of a team to cover Lompoc and improve countywide coverage, utilizing de-escalation and crisis intervention techniques.
  • Pretrial Services: Addition of two pretrial service navigators to assist vulnerable individuals in attending court hearings and accessing services.
  • Restorative Justice: Expansion of the District Attorney’s Neighborhood Restorative Justice Program to the northern part of the county, including funding for a UC Santa Barbara evaluation.
  • Housing: Expansion of a housing specialist position from part-time to full-time to support permanent housing projects.
  • Fiscal details indicated an ongoing AB 109 program budget of $20.1 million, reflecting a $2 million increase over the current year. The plan includes $1.1 million in restricted fund balance and anticipates ending the fiscal year with $26.7 million in restricted fund balance. Staff recommended allocating an additional $226,000 for pilot or one-time activities.
  • Board members asked questions regarding the distinction between ongoing and one-time funding, the geographic scope of the co-response team in Lompoc, and methodologies for measuring recidivism given changes in state law. Supervisor Capps inquired about the timeline for the Familiar Faces program, with staff indicating it is expected to launch in the summer. Supervisor Nelson confirmed the co-response expansion addresses a gap in North County.
  • Public comment was provided by Lynn Gibbs of NAMI, who commended the CCP’s programs but raised concerns about the shortage of treatment beds and the need to expand Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) to support outreach efforts. Director Navarro responded that Behavioral Wellness is restructuring intensive programs and expanding AOT/FSP services, with a comprehensive assessment of bed deficits expected in June.
  • Supervisor Hartman moved to approve staff’s recommendations A through D. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Williams. The motion passed.

Closed Session Report

  • The Board met in closed session to discuss existing litigation, including Anderson v. County of Santa Barbara. In the Anderson case, which involved CEQA challenges to the county’s plan to remove encroachments on East Mountain Drive, the Superior Court granted the petition and entered a peremptory written mandate on May 3, 2023. The Board authorized County Counsel to seek appellate review of the superior court decision. The approval to seek appellate review was unanimous.
  • The Board met in closed session regarding the appointment/reappointment of County Counsel. The vote to reappoint Rachel Van Molen as County Counsel was unanimous.

Departmental Item 7: County Executive Office and General Services – Jail Renovations and Construction

  • General Services Director Kirk Larroquist presented conceptual options for renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail and potential construction at the Northern Branch Jail (NBJ) to address requirements from the Murray et al. v. County stipulated judgment.
  • Main Jail Options: Due to high costs for full renovations, a limited footprint option was proposed. This involves renovating the Inmate Reception Center (IRC) for intake, ADA compliance, and medical/mental health screening, improving outdoor yards, and addressing deferred maintenance. The Main Jail would serve primarily as a booking and arraignment facility. Estimated costs are approximately $17.5 million for IRC renovations, ADA work, yard separation, and deferred maintenance.
  • Northern Branch Jail Options: To accommodate bed capacity lost at the Main Jail, three expansion options were presented for NBJ:
  • 1. One Pod: 728 total system beds; estimated cost $76.6 million; 61-month timeline. 2. One and a Half Pods: 856 total system beds; estimated cost $114.9 million; 65-month timeline. 3. Two Pods: 984 total system beds; estimated cost $142.6 million; 69-month timeline.
  • Assistant CEO Jeff Brapwell detailed the financing implications, noting that Option 1 would result in approximately $5.4 million in annual debt service over 30 years. Staff indicated that operating savings might cover the debt service for Option 1, while Options 1.5 and 2 would present funding gaps of $2.4 million and $4 million, respectively.
  • Assistant CEO Tonya Heitman recommended Option 1 (One Pod) as the best long-term strategy, aligning funding with staffing capacity and population needs. She noted that local population forecasts suggest little to no growth in the at-risk age demographic over the next 10 years, and current trends show downward trajectories in arrests and jail populations. Staff acknowledged concerns from the Sheriff’s Office regarding potential future overcrowding but emphasized the need for continued diversion strategies and community-based treatment.
  • Supervisor Nelson asked about financing timelines and potential revenue growth from Prop 172 and General Fund to cover costs. Staff confirmed that debt service does not impact the budget until the building is accepted, allowing time for planning. Supervisor Nelson also inquired about the assumptions behind population growth estimates, specifically regarding housing element updates. Staff referenced a consultant’s analysis based on local incarceration rates and state demographic data. Supervisor Nelson asked about the number of seriously mentally ill individuals in jail; staff stated there are at least 60 in acute need, with 48 identified as incompetent to stand trial.
  • Supervisors and staff discussed the financial, operational, and population implications of the three options. Staff explained that the issuance of tax-exempt bonds (COP) is typically timed to occur approximately two to three years before construction begins to ensure accurate cost data and compliance with IRS spending requirements. The current interest rate assumption for planning purposes is approximately 4.5%.
  • Staff and the Public Defender’s Office provided data regarding the jail population. It was noted that approximately 60 individuals with severe and persistent mental illness are currently in custody, with 75% expected to return to the community rather than long-term commitment. Additionally, over 30 individuals are awaiting substance abuse treatment beds, with some waiting 30–45 days. The Public Defender’s Office reported that 117 clients are in jail who have been identified by the court, DA, and defense as needing community treatment rather than incarceration. Staff indicated that projects such as "Familiar Faces" and "Hope Village" aim to mitigate jail intake for this population.
  • The Sheriff’s Office stated that total operational costs for detention are approximately $90 million annually, with about $22 million attributed to the Northern Branch Jail. Staff indicated that building additional capacity at the Northern Branch is more cost-effective than rehabilitating or rebuilding the South County Jail. Under the one-pod option, projected operational savings are estimated to offset the additional debt service costs.
  • The Sheriff’s Office argued that the one-pod option results in 728 rated beds, which is below the current average daily population of 750–780 and does not allow for the standard 85% occupancy buffer required for classification and safety. The Sheriff recommended the two-pod option to approach a 1,000-bed capacity, citing staffing shortages, case backlogs, and the need for safe operations. Staff noted that the one-pod option includes provisions for full shift relief to address staffing shortages, though further analysis with outside experts may be required.
  • Staff clarified that the board’s direction would initiate a two-step process: negotiating an amendment to the design agreement for the South County Jail and developing a scope of work for the Northern Branch. Final decisions on the number of pods for the Northern Branch would be made later, prior to bidding, allowing for flexibility based on the effectiveness of diversion programs. It was confirmed that the South County Jail would be remodeled to serve as an intake and assessment center with 128 beds, primarily for pre-arraignment housing to reduce transportation costs and facilitate release into local communities.
  • Eighteen members of the public provided comments.
  • Support for Option 1: Speakers representing criminal defense attorneys, the League of Women Voters, CLU (Clergy and Laity United), NAMI, Families Act, and individual residents supported Option 1. They cited the need to reduce jail capacity, address racial disparities in incarceration, divert individuals with mental health and substance abuse issues to community treatment, and reduce costs. They argued that current crime trends and diversion programs support a lower jail population.
  • Support for Option 2: The Sheriff, the Deputy Sheriff’s Association, the Chief Deputy District Attorney, and police chiefs from Lompoc, Guadalupe, and Santa Maria supported Option 2 or opposed reducing capacity. They cited current jail populations exceeding 750, the need for classification buffers, staffing shortages, case backlogs, and the necessity of adequate capacity to house individuals convicted of serious felonies. They argued that reducing capacity would compromise safety, violate court orders regarding overcrowding, and fail to account for future population growth and increased law enforcement activity.
  • Other Comments: One speaker from SEIU Local 620 expressed concern that funding for the jail expansion would come from operational budgets, exacerbating staffing shortages and safety risks for employees. Another speaker opposed all options, questioning the logistics of the two-jail system and the lack of mental health beds.
  • Supervisor Lavagnino referenced a 2015 proposal that was rejected due to cost concerns, noting that current construction costs for similar capacity are significantly higher. He argued that the county must address current needs rather than solely focusing on affordability, citing population growth and the high percentage of felony inmates. He expressed support for designing one-and-a-half pods to allow for future flexibility.
  • Supervisor Hartmann supported staff’s recommendation to downsize the South County Jail and build one pod in the North, citing the need to avoid locking the county into an outdated incarceration model. She proposed designing for one-and-a-half pods to maintain flexibility but delaying the final construction decision until diversion program progress is assessed.
  • Supervisor Nielsen questioned the incremental costs of designing for different pod configurations and the timeline for design-build contracts. She expressed concern that population growth projections might be underestimated and advocated for designing for two pods to ensure long-term capacity, arguing that design costs are lower than construction costs and that starting larger allows for easier reduction later. She also questioned whether funding for jail expansion and mental health beds is mutually exclusive.
  • Supervisor Nelson opposed immediate expansion beyond one pod, citing the unsustainable growth of overtime costs and the need to prioritize employee retention and mental health treatment beds. He stated he would be open to one-and-a-half pods if the Sheriff’s department could identify specific cost savings, such as reducing overtime, to offset the additional debt service.
  • Staff provided historical budget data showing that the jail’s reliance on General Discretionary Revenue has increased from 53% pre-recession to nearly 70% currently. Staff emphasized the need for a shift in spending priorities toward diversion and noted that the current model is not sustainable.
  • Sheriff Brown stated that Option 1 (one pod) is not viable in the long term and that Option 1.5 merely maintains current capacity. He argued that the county must build sufficient capacity to avoid overcrowding and recommended modifying the motion to plan for one-and-a-half pods to avoid future delays and additional costs. He also expressed concern about the ability to meet obligations under the DRC settlement if the plan is not adjusted.

Motions and Votes

  • 1. Motion by Supervisor Lavagnino: To direct staff to proceed with the South County Jail renovation plan (eliminating unused beds) and to obtain designs for Option 2 (one-and-a-half pods) for the Northern Branch Jail, including CEQA compliance.
  • Seconded by: Supervisor Nielsen.
  • Outcome: Failed.
  • 2. Motion by Supervisor Hartmann: To direct staff to proceed with Option A, B, and C1 (design for one pod) and to return within one year to assess diversion progress and jail population projections.
  • Outcome: Passed.

Departmental Item 8: Dignity Moves / La Posada LLC Ground Lease and Development Agreement

  • Staff presented a recommendation to execute a ground lease, development management agreement, and temporary right of entry with Dignity Moves for a temporary interim supportive housing project at 4500 Hollister Avenue. The project, known as La Posada, will provide up to 90 modular housing cabins for individuals experiencing unsheltered homelessness, specifically targeting those in nearby encampments. Good Samaritan Shelter will serve as the operator, providing 24/7 staffing, security, and case management services.
  • Supervisor Capps inquired about the number of active encampments in the immediate area, the safety of nearby schools and businesses, and the success of previous Dignity Moves projects. Staff reported 47 active encampment sites with an estimated 60–90 residents in the immediate vicinity. Staff noted that the previous Dignity Moves site in Santa Barbara has had no complaints regarding safety or loitering and has successfully transitioned residents to permanent housing. Staff confirmed that the project includes private transportation to reduce foot traffic on Juvenile Hall Road and that case management and behavioral health services will be provided on-site.
  • Supervisor Nelson noted that the first Dignity Moves project in his district has been well-received by neighbors, with no reported issues.
  • Supervisor Nielsen asked whether residents would have access to case managers and mental health/substance abuse treatment. Staff confirmed that intensive case management and behavioral health services are included in the budget for each resident.
  • The Clerk noted there were 50 speakers registered for public comment on this item. The Chair indicated that due to the number of speakers, individual speaking times would be limited to 60 seconds.

Public Comment

  • The Board accepted public comment from numerous individuals and representatives regarding the proposed lease for the Dignity Moves La Posada site.
  • Supporters:
  • A resident of Santa Barbara expressed support, citing the effectiveness of the existing Dignity Moves site and the dangers of unmanaged encampments.
  • Landon Rank, Associate Director for the Santa Barbara Alliance for Community Transformation (SBACT), stated the organization’s full support, noting that non-congregate shelter settings are appealing to individuals hesitant to leave encampments.
  • Kai Tilley, a citizen, voiced support.
  • Sharon Byrne, of the Montecito Association and SBACT, expressed full support after touring the downtown site, praising the "no visitors, no drugs, no alcohol" policy.
  • Elizabeth Funk, Founder and CEO of Dignity Moves, stated that encampments pose a greater danger than structured sites and commended the County for its leadership.
  • Craig Minus, Executive Director of the Coastal Housing Coalition, commended Dignity Moves for providing transitional housing and noted the organization’s applicability to workforce housing.
  • Catherine Soto-Vasquez, of Ramon Associates, supported the project, arguing that keeping people in encampments near highways and railroads is unsafe and immoral.
  • Ethan Bertrand, a member of the Goleta School Board, supported the project, citing his experience with the county’s Project Roomkey.
  • Linda Honigman, a homeowner, expressed satisfaction with the staff and the project’s potential to help residents move to permanent housing.
  • Sheriff Bill Brown (via audio/video) expressed full support, noting the safety benefits of a supervised environment compared to encampments and the partnership with Good Samaritan.
  • Kirsten Cahoon, Director of Homeless Services for Good Samaritan Shelter, supported the project, emphasizing the organization’s commitment to being a good neighbor and providing dignity.
  • Dahlia Urfot, a member of the Dignity Moves Santa Barbara Regional Council, supported the project as a moral obligation to help unsheltered residents.
  • Kristin Flickinger, a homeowner, supported the project, citing the opportunity to house all individuals experiencing chronic homelessness in the county.
  • Ben Romo, a resident, supported the project, stating it would make the community safer and demonstrate care for vulnerable neighbors.
  • Bonnie Beeples, a resident, supported the project, arguing that supportive housing is safer than encampments.
  • Ruby Romo, a student, supported the project, linking support for homeless individuals to support for children.
  • Pat Wheatley, a professor and former homeless individual, supported the project, citing the community’s role in his own stability.
  • Pat Wheatley (Housing Authority Chair), speaking in a different capacity, supported the project as a necessary link in the continuum of housing options.
  • Michael Harris, Government Affairs Officer for SenCal Health, supported the project and requested a "yes" vote.
  • A parent of students at Trivium Charter School supported the development, arguing that the opposition was a "red herring."
  • Diane Black, representing the League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara, recommended the Board approve the lease.
  • Paige Sawiat, a community member, supported the project, stating it would alleviate pressure on the system and prevent death.
  • Matt Riley, Regional Executive Director for Dignity Moves, thanked the Board and staff for their leadership and the community for their feedback.
  • Marge Coffervelli, Chief Real Estate Officer for Dignity Moves, thanked the Board and staff for their leadership and the community for their input.
  • A resident across the street from the site supported the project but urged caution regarding the scale compared to the downtown site.
  • Larry Severance, a property owner, supported the project, citing his family’s experience with transitional housing.
  • Joan Hartmann addressed the board regarding the managed encampment project in Isla Vista. She described the transition from informal sleeping arrangements to structured encampments during the pandemic, noting associated challenges with health, sanitation, fire safety, and crime. Hartmann outlined the process of integrating individuals into ordered living situations, including establishing sleep-wake cycles, meeting medical needs, and organizing personal documents. She referenced the work of GoodSAM in supporting individuals and noted that the Board of Supervisors has allocated ARPA funds and resources to address homelessness. Hartmann stated her support for the project and expressed the view that structured management would improve community safety and assist individuals in stabilizing their lives.
  • Opponents/Concerns:
  • A citizen questioned why the site was not located across the freeway, away from children.
  • Jenna Motola raised concerns about the site’s capacity, the potential for repopulation of the encampment, the lack of sobriety requirements, and the isolation of the site compared to the downtown location.
  • David Thomas expressed concern that neighbors were not notified and questioned whether other encampments would be cleared first.
  • Adrian Shule opposed the location, citing the proximity to daycare centers, playing fields, and the Page Youth Center, and suggested the site be moved to the 205 acres across the street.
  • Janice Thompson urged the Board to postpone the decision, arguing the process was rushed and suggesting a phased approach with fewer units.
  • Lauren Duncan urged the Board not to approve the lease in its current terms, suggesting a shorter lease term, fewer units, or a different site, and questioning the 5-year commitment.
  • Leslie Owen opposed the location, citing the presence of early childhood learning centers, home daycares, and the Page Youth Center.
  • Sue Walseth asked the Board not to sign the lease, suggesting the site be considered near the county offices instead.
  • A neighbor expressed concern about the impact on the neighborhood and the lack of prior notification.
  • Annette House, representing her family’s property, opposed the location, citing the proximity to a little league field and the potential impact on children.
  • A homeowner and father urged the Board to reject the lease for this location and place the project next to services.

Staff Response and Supervisor Comments

  • Supervisor Capps asked staff to clarify how the project would legally allow for the clearing of the encampment and to describe the on-site services and security.
  • Kimberly Albers (Staff) explained that the lack of beds currently prevents the enforcement of trespassing laws to remove belongings from the encampment. The new beds would allow the County to address the encampment and repost if necessary. She described the site as a 24/7 facility with 8x8 rooms, recreational facilities, and on-site mental health and substance abuse services. Transportation would be provided for appointments rather than residents walking off-site.
  • Supervisor Nelson stated he would support the project, acknowledging the concerns of parents but noting the site’s geography limits easy access. He emphasized the importance of accountability and the operator’s ability to remove disruptive individuals ("86" policy). He noted the site was also identified for future employee housing.
  • Supervisor Capps thanked the public for their comments, noting that concerns do not equate to a lack of care for homelessness. She stated that the management plan is being updated based on feedback, including adding fencing. She expressed confidence in the team’s expertise and the project’s potential to make the neighborhood safer.
  • Supervisor Lavagnino supported the project, citing the reliability of the Dignity Moves and Good Samaritan teams. He acknowledged the validity of neighbors' concerns but expressed confidence in the staff’s ability to manage issues.
  • Supervisor Katz supported the project, noting that the Santa Maria project is already underway and serving as a learning opportunity. He affirmed the commitment to clear the encampment once units are available and to be responsive to any issues.

Decision

  • Laura Capps moved to adopt the staff recommendation for departmental item 8, sections A through F. Bob Nelson seconded the motion. Joan Hartmann also indicated a second. The board called for a vote. The motion passed.