BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 October 6, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:0618 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:00

I'm Infinite space beyond us. This is a place very open for everyone.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed0:28

It is called the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, but it's not our building. It's your building. It's all of our building. It''s Ma's and Mia's and Tracy's. All of the staff who work here, all of the construction workers who built it this entire community city and world we are giving it to you. It is our gift to you because it belongs to all of us and so we say welcome home

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:55

I cannot wait to visit myself. Now to our next story, families came out to Dockweiler Beach for a coastal cleanup event and to learn more about marine life and the critical need to preserve our beaches take a look

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:23

Today we are celebrating Coastal Cleanup Day. We're at the Dockweiler Youth Center. We've had about 200 people come down for the combination Department of Beaches and Harbors and Heal The Bay coastal cleanup. It's designed for families We've got the Rediscover Center is here for recycling-based arts and crafts. We've got Traveling Tide Pool so kids can learn about our marine life off the Southern California coast.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:48

We bring our little touch tank to schools or events like this and get to teach people about all the animals in the water.

CommentTyreke ShippProposedself-stated1:54

I like it!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:55

Right now we have our coral cat shark, we're gonna have a Cortez stingray lots of different kinds of sea stars. We'll have chocolate chip sea stars green brittle sea stars

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:07

It's important to protect our environment because we're on this planet together. If we clean the oceans and keep our animals safe, we are going to live in a safer environment for our children to enjoy the beach. Whereas if we just leave things as it is and don't try to solve some of the problems that come with pollution then ultimately it's going to affect us as humans and it's just gonna go up the chain to effect.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:32

We have a few free hours to give back to the community and give back to nature and make the beaches a nicer, safer place for people and animals and the world.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:43

It's important to pick up trash from the beach because it can help the earth grow.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:59

The new outpatient building at the reimagined Harbor UCLA Medical Center in Torrance is open for patients and what a beautiful space to come for care. Come take a look inside with us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:17

I'd like to start off with, wow! Because when I look at this, that's all I can say is wow. And thank you. Thank you for being here and so today we are opening more than just a new building. We're opening a new chapter in how we care for the South Bay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:39

We are here at the ribbon-cutting ceremony for Harbor UCLA Outpatient Center. We just took a tour, an amazing beautiful new physical plant that's a part of a new six building expansion 1.8 billion dollar investment I'm The color scheme, to the layout of the exam rooms, to where staff are positioned in proximity to accessing patients. It's amazing to see.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed4:33

All of those years of work come together in this moment where we can get to the point where we're gonna allow our patients to experience in a physical way, in a physical building that excellence. The same excellence that they have always received at Harvard, that they've always received at every health services site. But they're gonna see that and feel that in the walls, in the paintings, in the physical embodiment

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed5:04

What an exciting day. We are delighted to have the community, our providers, our staff, our county officials, our system leadership and our leadership here All together to commemorate the opening of Harvard UCLA Medical Center's new outpatient tower. We are delighted to very soon welcome our first patients to this outpatient clinic building, which will provide world-class state-of-the-art equipment and care that our patients so deserve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed5:44

The building was designed as a moment frame building, steel glass and concrete with the idea that we get as much natural light into the building. And you can see we've achieved that in a really neat way. Other features that they're going to see in the future are a lot of artwork. We're gonna have a common space here that will hold a key component of art and then just again the transportation system and power system and essentially what gets you to UCLA is gonna make it much more easy for people to receive those services

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed6:11

To see the floor where we'll have a big meeting room and recognizing this is a teaching facility, and to have a physical plant that accommodates that reality too. I am so excited for the grand opening of this site on September 22nd. And I'm most excited for the residents in this community who rely on this medical center and hospital and new outpatient center to meet the needs of their families.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:40

Thank you so much for joining us. We leave you now with scenes from Los Angeles State Park and we'll see you next time on LA County Close Up.

0:07 – 0:115 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed7:58

We're out of beer. I'll make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed8:01

a quick run. No way! I'll be back, I'll be back.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed8:07

Oh what up bro? Okay I'll be back. Hey aren't you too drunk to drive? It's called hydration baby that's why we drink it.

CommentHelen EigenbergProposedself-stated9:49

LA County celebrates Hispanic Heritage Month.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed10:23

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

0:15 – 0:224 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role15:45

One, two, three. Good morning everyone and we want to welcome you to our regularly scheduled meeting of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Today as you know is Tuesday October the 6th 2026. Please take note that supervisor Mitchell will be absent from our meeting today and we take note that a quorum of the board is present. The chief executive officer county council and chief deputy executive officer and the sergeant at arms are all here to assist you We will now begin today's meeting with a moment of silence in remembrance of the victims of the Catalina-Medevac helicopter crash. And I will turn it over to Supervisor Janice Hahn, who will lead us in a moment of silence.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction16:29

Thank you, Madam Chair. I wanted all of us to take a moment this morning to remember the three lives that were lost in last week Wednesday's horrific helicopter crash off the coast of Catalina Island. Steve Robinson, Jessica DeVries and Catalina Romero. Steve and Jessica dedicated their careers to saving lives. Steve was 59 years old and was piloting the helicopter that night. He had previously served as a Marine Corps pilot and was a devoted husband and father.

Jessica DeRise was 48 and served as a nurse for Reach Air Medical Services. She had dedicated her career not only to practicing as a flight nurse, but to educating others so they could save lives. And Catalina Romero was a 45-year-old Avalon resident working in hospitality on the island. She will be remembered as a loving mom who worked hard to make a living for her family.

The loss of Steve, Jessica and Catalina is devastating not only to Avalon but to our entire county. And I invite everyone to keep the two survivors of this horrific crash including Catalina's son and another flight medic in our thoughts as they continue to recover in a hospital. And now please join me in a moment of silence. Let's stand.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role18:32

Thank you very much Supervisor Hahn. We express our condolences as well, thank you. With that we will now start the county's land acknowledgement. The County of Los Angeles recognizes that we occupy land originally and still inhabited and cared for by the Tongva, Tatavia, Serrano, Quiche, and Chumash peoples. We honor and pay respect to their elders and descendants past present and emerging as they continue their stewardship of these lands and waters. We acknowledge that settler colonization resulted in land seizure disease, subjugation, slavery, relocation, broken promises, genocide and multi-generational trauma. This acknowledgement demonstrates our responsibility and commitment to truth healing and reconciliation and to elevating the stories culture and community of the original inhabitants of Los Angeles County.

We are grateful to have the opportunity to live and work on these ancestral lands We are dedicated to growing and sustaining relationships with Native peoples and local tribal governments, including in no particular order. Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Gabrieleno Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role20:02

Indians, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians Kish Nation, To learn more about the First Peoples of Los Angeles County, please visit the Los Angeles City-County Native American Indian Commission website at lanaic.lacounty.gov And with that, members the invocation will be led by Pastor Javier Nunez from Victory Outreach Church representing the third district followed by the Pledge of Allegiance which will be led by Leonard Soto private first class Southland Young Marines from the fourth district. So if you are able please stand and join us.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed21:01

Thank you Honorable Solis for that. Supervisor Barger, Juan and of course Horovitz. And it's good to be here this morning because you know what brings joy to my heart is the partnership between the Los Angeles County Faith Alliance and the L.A. County Supervisors because we can't Take care of the problems that we have in our county alone. We need clergy to be involved, and we need government to be involved to make a difference.

This morning, Lord I pray that we would have a peaceful assembly Heavenly Father. That you would guide every leader Lord God that sits here making decisions and Lord at times there are decisions that have to be made that maybe some constituents won't be happy with and some will it's such a difficult task It's even more difficult to end your day and go home and not take your work with you when you're thinking about the different problems in our county.

But that's what leaders do, Lord. So I pray for every leader here that You would help them. They all have personal needs. And so does our county. So we leave it to You, Lord because we have no one else to go to at times. At times there is devastation Father, and we pray for all those that have lost lost ones. Lord God reporting on different events taking place in our county and what took place father with these helicopter crashes in the last month.

It's devastating to families the loss of loved ones but we pray for comfort and this morning we pray for your peace and I want to thank you for another beautiful day that were able to serve in the Lord's name amen

0:23 – 0:287 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed23:06

Please face the flag. Place your right hand over your heart, if you are a veteran you may render a hand salute and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. Please face the flag.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role23:36

Supervisor Horvath.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed23:42

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Please join me in thanking Pastor Javier Nunez for leading our invocation today. Pastor Nunez is both a community leader and a minister in the Victory Outreach Network combining his faith work with civic engagement and youth outreach in the Van Nuys area. Victory Outreach Church of Van Nuys is part of a global ministry with a history of reaching hurting communities especially in inner cities.

However, Pastor Nunez's work extends beyond the church. He also serves as the board chair of Champions in Service in the San Fernando Valley. Champions in Service is a non-profit based in Pacoima that has been providing wraparound services job training and youth outreach in the San Fernando Valley and greater Los Angeles for over 30 years. Pastor Nunez also has 50 years of experience in the construction industry and presides as president of the Laborers Local 300 of Los Angeles.

Lastly, Pastor Nunez is a member of the Rotary Club of Greater Van Nuys and represents the Northeast San Fernando Valley in the Los Angeles County Faith Alliance. And previously served as chair of the Arlita Neighborhood Council. Is there anything you don't do? I mean really what a bio Thank You pastor Nunez for joining us today and for leading our invocation and For all that you do for our community, and we are so proud to have you in the third district Your service is truly exceptional, and we're very grateful for you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed25:33

Thank you.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction25:42

Thank you Madam Chair, and thank you Leonard for leading us this morning in the Pledge of Allegiance. Young Marine Private First Class Leonard Soto is just 11 years old and has been a Southland young marine since he was eight. In 2024 he was named his unit's Young Marine of the Year and he has already completed more than 175 hours of community service. Leonard was also the first young Marine in his unit to earn the drug demand reduction ribbon, recognizing his work educating his peers about the dangers of drugs and alcohol.

The Southland Young Marines reached out to my office and asked me to introduce the motion we're going to be voting on later today to recognize Red Ribbon Week October 23rd through October 31st. Red Ribbon Week is a national drug prevention campaign that encourages young people to make healthy, drug-free choices. It was established in memory of DEA Special Agent Enrique Kiki Camarena and has become an important opportunity for communities to come together around drug prevention. Leonard, you are a wonderful example of what Red Ribbon Week represents.

At just 11 years old, you are already using your voice to educate your peers, serve your community and encourage other young people to make healthy choices. And I want to also recognize Young Marine Lance Corporal Harley Herrera who is in the audience today and she led our pledge last year And she's here supporting Leonard. Thank you, Harley for being here.

Thank you, Leonard, for leading us in the pledge. Thank you, Harley, your families and the entire Southland Young Marines for the work you do in our community. And on behalf of the entire Board of Supervisors, I wanted to present you with this official County of Los Angeles Certificate of Appreciation for your participation this morning with us. And then we'll look right up there for a photo.

Thank you. Good job.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role28:06

Supervisor Varga.

0:28 – 0:301 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed28:10

Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm going to let them hold the cat because I tried this morning and got eaten alive. These are two amazing kittens and it says forget about your worries in your strife with these two sweet kittens named after beloved Jungle Book characters meet Mowgli and Baloo? Is it Mowgli? Okay. These little ones are just 2 months old They were transferred with their mom to Agoura from the Palmdale Care Center.

They love to play, snuggle and chase their toys and they do love to chase their toys. You can call the Agoura Care Center at 818-991-0071 and the bare necessities of your life will come true. They are very, very sweet but they're a little timid. Cats are hard to bring to the board because they do get a little scared So this is Baloo and Mowgli. All right, and now if you will look up and see the Screen for the pet from Palmdale. Meet Gracie Lou, this gorgeous nine month old German Shepherd has a sweet affectionate demeanor. Gracie is gentle and a loving girl with a heart of gold.

She can be a little shy when she meets other dogs but with a little more socialization she'll do great in the play yard. She has some puppy tendencies with more training to build her confidence and manners. She is going to make an amazing pet for somebody Call the Palmdale Care Center at 661-575-2888 to bring Gracie home. As a reminder, October is Adopt-a-Shelter Dog Month to celebrate our Department of Animal Care and Control brought back its Read to Rover program. Residents can come to a shelter and read to a dog. If you decide to adopt that day your dog's adoption fees will be waived.

Even if you're not looking to adopt, you can still read and offer the dogs at our care centers some well-deserved company. The program will be available all month long at all seven of our care centers. Centers are open Monday through Saturday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m for walk-ins. Visit animalcare.lacounty.gov to see all the pets who could be yours. Do they have to make reservations if they're going to come and read? So you can just come in and take time and get to know all the animals Thank you, Madam Chair.

0:30 – 0:332 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role30:45

Thank you very much with that executive officer will you please call the agenda?

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction30:52

Good morning madam chair and members of the board Tuesday's agenda will begin on page 2 consent calendar Board of Supervisors items 1 through 20 on item 10 supervisor Han requests that this item be held on item 14 supervisor Solis requests that this item be referred back to her office On item 20, Supervisor Mitchell requests that this item be continued two weeks to October 20th, 2026. The next regularly scheduled meeting On page 17, Administrative Matters items 21 through 71. On item 21 the Chief Executive Officer requests that this item be continued to October 27th 2026 as indicated on the posted agenda. On item 22 Supervisor Mitchell request that this item be continued to November 10th 2026 as indicated on the supplemental agenda. On item 26 this includes a revision as indicated on the supplemental agenda.

An item 42 this item will be held for report On page 42, this includes miscellaneous additions to the agenda which were posted more than 72 hours in advance of the meeting as indicated on the supplemental agenda items 69A through 69E. On page 43, separate matter item 72. On item 72 this is a recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the issuance and the sale of Los Angeles Unified School District general obligation bonds series QRRUS 2026 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1.4 billion. The board will take a separate vote on this item.

On page 44, Special District Agenda. This is the agenda for the meeting of the Los Angeles County Development Authority items 1D and 2D. On page 46, Notice of Closed Session, items CS1 through CS4. On CS1, county council requests that this item be continued two weeks to October 20th, 2016 as indicated on the posted agenda. On CS2, the Chief Executive Officer requests that this item be continued two weeks to October 20th, 2026 as indicated on the supplemental agenda.

The request for continuances and refer back through CS4 before you. That completes the reading of the agenda, Madam Chair.

0:33 – 0:396 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role33:23

Thank you, and I'll recognize

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed33:24

Supervisor Horvath for a comment. Thank you, Madam Chair. Of course, I'm supportive of the continuance of item 20. I think it's important for us all to be here all of the conversations that we have on the GRTF's recommendations. I just want to acknowledge that they've had, there's been extensive discussion. I know that there were some questions at Cluster. I just want to make sure we make every effort to get those answered so we can take action on the 20th. I know the GRTF is relying on us to keep moving at a schedule based on the timeline that they have to operate under and so I just wanna make sure we honor that. Thanks.

Roll-call vote Moved by Janice Hahn · Seconded by Barger
Show transcript
Thank you and with that these items moved by Supervisor Hahn, seconded by Supervisor Barger to approve the items and that will be the order. Executive Officer please play the code of conduct.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed34:15

Ladies and gentlemen may I please have your attention? The meeting of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is about to commence. A code of conduct will now be read and we request that you comply with it to ensure the efficient administration of the meeting. Members of the public, it is your right to participate in today's board hearing and the Board encourages such participation. However, the right of the public to address the Board must be balanced with the need to ensure that public comment does not interfere with the orderly course of the Board's business.

All are reminded to abide by the following rules. Speakers must cease speaking immediately when their time has ended. Public comment on agenda items must relate to the subject matter of that item. General public comment is limited to subjects within the jurisdiction of the board. Public comment does not include the right to engage in a dialogue with board members or staff.

Please remain respectful of the forum and refrain from uttering, writing or displaying profane, personal, threatening, derogatory, demeaning or other abusive statements toward the Board, any member thereof, staff or any other person. Members of the audience should be respectful of the views expressed by speakers, staff and board members and may not clap, cheer, whistle or otherwise disrupt the orderly conduct of the meeting.

Any person engaging in conduct that disrupts the meeting is subject to being removed from the board meeting. And finally, if you witness conduct or behavior by other members of the public that disrupts your ability to remain engaged or participate in this meeting, please notify the sergeant at arms or other county staff. Thank you for your cooperation.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role36:17

Thank you. With that, today's meeting order will be the following public comment on items not held for discussion by the board including closed session matters followed by item 10 then item 42 followed by general public comment and finishing up with closed session before we begin executive officer please read the call in information and explain the speaking rules

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction36:41

Good morning, members of the public. Individuals participating in public comment either by phone or in person will have the opportunity to register for the desired items prior to the agenda item being heard. We encourage all members of the public to register to speak during today's meeting on our website at www.publiccomment.lacounty.gov. Registering online will allow you to identify the agenda items that you are interested in addressing.

You will receive confirmation email with further instructions To receive notifications via text message on your phone, when the item you wish to address is next just enter your phone number on the website. If you do not have a computer or wish to make a comment at any time when the agenda item is active you may call 213-444-2600 and press star then follow the instructions to register an operator will be on the phone to assist.

You can find more information on our website at bos.lacounty.gov. Please click on remote participation instructions for more information. You have the opportunity to address the board throughout the meeting. For items not held by the board, you will receive one minute for one item and up to two minutes for two or more items. For items held by supervisors, you will have one minute to address the board and one minute to address the board on general public comment.

Please clearly state your name and indicate the agenda item numbers you will be addressing. Please note, once your time has expired we will immediately

move to the next speaker. When it is your turn to speak if registered, your name or the last four digits of your phone number will be called. To ensure we hear from both in-person and remote speakers, we will alternate between the two speaking cues. Members of the public who are in attendance when you hear or see your name displayed on the screen please come down to the front of the boardroom and staff will assist you. Please do not approach the podium until directed to do so.

Also for members of the public in attendance, please note that we have a constituent assistant team that includes representatives from the Department of Mental Health, Public Health, L.A. Health Services, Public Social Services, Children and Family Services, Homeless Services and Housing, and Parks and Recreation in the audience should you need assistance from them.

At this time we will hear from members of the public wishing to address the board on all items not held for discussion by the Board of Supervisors, including closed session matters. The consent items will be acted upon with one motion. For members of the public already on the phone if you have signed up to speak for these items you do not need to do anything further if you're on the phone Have not signed up to speak or would like to comment on these items, please press star now and follow the prompts to be placed into the speaking queue. If you are watching the meeting and would like to address the board on these items, please call 213-444-2600, press star, and follow the prompts. An operator will be on the phone to assist. Please be prepared to indicate the agenda item numbers that you wish to address.

0:39 – 0:4513 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed39:46

We will now call in-person speakers and while they are coming forward, we will take remote speakers. This will be for all items not held by the board for discussion and closed session items. Lauren Martinez, Brian Bergman, Paloma Bustos, Sophia Vidal, Sylvie Andrews, and Cara Valo. Alex de Goode your line is open please begin. Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed40:10

hi good morning I'm speaking in support of item number 40 To vacate and set aside the prior approvals of the Canyon View Estates project. I represent the applicant for the project, the applicant has abandoned the project and is not moving forward with it so it is proper to vacate and set aside the project approvals. So again, I'm in support of item 40. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed40:39

Thank you. Maxwell Cabello please state the agenda item you are addressing your line is open please begin.

CommentNaxo CabrilloProposedself-stated40:48

Hi, I'm speaking on agenda item 18 advancing low-carbon construction in LA County. Thank you for your time my name is Naxo Cabrillo and I am the Senior Associate of Legislative and Regulatory Policy at the Southern California Association of Nonprofit Housing or SCAMH. We're an advocacy organization representing developers of affordable housing in Southern California we build housing that's deeply affordable meets critical needs of lonesome residents in Southern California including LA County and often our buildings have the highest green standards This housing is obviously important to units that are actually affordable low income tenants and they're also often EJ impacted residents of those communities. But just any changes in requirements we look to work with LACTA or any County level entities that might be making changes because, as you may well know, affordable housing developers work on very narrow margins.

Listening to the presentation on this it sounds like it may not impact cost but any other unanticipated impacts we'd like to be kind of included on in shaping any changes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed41:50

Thank you. Hager Dickman please state the agenda item you're addressing and begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed41:57

I'm addressing item number 69B, Preparing and Addressing the End of Assisted Living Facility Transitions Benefit for Vulnerable Residents in LA County. I am the Director of California LTSS Advocacy at Justice in Aging. On January 1st about 2,300 low-income older adults and people with significant disabilities currently housed in LA County are set to lose their housing when Health Net, their MediCal managed care plan stops covering their MediCal services and licensed assisted living facilities Most of these individuals moved into the facility sometime this year, many from nursing homes or from family homes after their care needs became too high for their family members to continue caring for them safely at home. Without intervention from the county and the state these residents will lack the financial means to continue covering their housing and will further contribute to increasing rates of homelessness in LA County and in the state there are too few nursing home beds to absorb all 2300 residents, most of whom have no home to return to.

Individuals who have a family home require...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed42:58

Thank you. Roy Humphries please state the agenda items you're addressing and begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed43:04

Yes, items 61521 and 69B. On item six, how hideous and obscene this is. Menopause month? How about this ladies that until you put erectile dysfunction month up there you take this thing off and apologize to all on the item 15 opposing the Census Bureau proposed changes thank goodness for this we have Trump in there What's your That is the 69B. We're all vulnerable thanks to the negligence and irresponsible and criminal activities of this board led by women, and putting us all at risk due to again Biden illegals and the legacy illegals is another topic, all of which you should be in federal penitentiary for Alligator Alcatraz.

Thank you.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed44:25

Thank you, Yadi. Please state the agenda items you're addressing and begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed44:32

Hi, yes. I'm speaking on item 69D the analysis of the SoCal fire. I am an Eden Fire survivor and I urge the board to take their time to thoroughly review the materials and to ensure that there's robust community engagement and feedback in the process. And I also want to support item number 14 restricting data centers being built in the county area. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed45:00

Thank you. Caller ending in 7223, please state your name and agenda items you're addressing and begin.

CommentRose ScottProposedself-stated45:08

Hi my name is Rose Scott and I'm addressing the item 14, the data center and health issue. I am opposed to this. I mean I support it and I am opposed to the data centers but The ban on this or you know this measure and more. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed45:36

Thank you. Caller ending in 5340 please state your name and agenda items you're speaking on and begin.

0:45 – 0:5218 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed45:45

Yes my name is Joey. This is a general comment. You know I

CommentRed Ribbon Week OctoberProposed · by introduction45:52

respect every single one

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed45:54

of you.

CommentRed Ribbon Week OctoberProposed · by introduction45:54

We're not on general public comment we're on comments by on items that are not held by the supervisors. So you need to identify which item that's not held that you are speaking on right now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed46:08

All I've got to say is, cut your salaries.

CommentRed Ribbon Week OctoberProposed · by introduction46:11

General public comment can be at the end of the meeting next speaker please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed46:14

Thank you we'll now go to in-person speakers please begin. Is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed46:22

it on? I don't know if you can hear me Mayor Brian Bergman, Mayor Alhambra Heights. I'm in favor of item 30 it's on your agenda today. This is we've been working on this for a long time with HCD. We have very few parcels in the city that we can really place affordable housing on and this is one of the prime properties for ingress and egress where we're really able to Accomplish our affordable housing and meet our needs with HCD Recently we had a fire on the and last month in September, and it was a brush fires retained to 17 acres Unfortunately we lost two houses but this will also create a fire break for us for La Habra Heights, and I want to thank the supervisors for LA County Air Operations, they were phenomenal. We had four helicopters.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:26

Thank you. Next speaker? You can finish. Go ahead sir. Pardon

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed47:29

me? Okay, let me finish. We had four helicopters up there and it was phenomenal that the job that they did 152 firefighters and it was a direct result of the air operations LA County that really contained this fire and stopped it. The big Chinook with Edison please keep that going. It's uh... I watched it airdrop over there and that's what put this fire out. It helped a lot. I know you bought the Sikorsky And that's a really good piece of equipment, but the Chinook holds twice as much water. So thank you very much.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role48:13

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed48:13

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed48:14

you. Next speaker? Lauren Martinez, Item 69D. I'd like to begin with a quote. I don't agree that it's LA County's responsibility to make sure we go into West Altadena. Those are the words of LA County Fire Chief Anthony Maroney after the Eaton fire ravaged our town and killed 19 people, 18 of which were in West Altadena. This moment will be easy to remember as 1-2-3.

One, the total number of L.A. County fire trucks reported in West Altadena at 3.08 a.m. on January 8th, 2025 compared to 64 in East Altadena and neighboring areas. Two, the number of days it took St. Louis to fire its Emergency Management Commissioner After an independent report found warning signs failed during a tornado that killed five people also in 2025. Three, the number of votes this board needs to reach a majority and take action one two three Contrary to Chief Maroney's belief West Altadena is part of Los Angeles County And we deserve timely alerts and a fire chief who recognizes us Thank You

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed49:19

next speaker

PresenterSylvie AndrewsAltadena for accountabilityProposedself-stated49:22

My name is Sylvie Andrews, I'm speaking to item 69D on behalf of Altadena for accountability. The ULRI report on the Eaton and Palisades fires is over 700 pages long and is the first truly independent review of LA County's actions during the fires. Because of this you need to give it more than the seven day turnaround time you're currently requesting for review.

The report contains hundreds of recommendations and this motion asks County Council to report back in just one week to identify only those recommendations that aren't already covered by your McChrystal and CityGate reports. That's not enough, the Altadena community demands to be involved in review of these findings many of which align with FSRIs...many of our recommendations aligned with FSRI's recommendations. Let me read to you some of the findings of this report page 216 LA County's Incident Command was unaware that the fire had progressed through Altadena west of Lake until the daylight hours on January 8th, 2025. Thank you next speaker.

CommentSofia VidalProposedself-stated50:26

Good morning, my name is Sofia Vidal and I was a 30-year resident and homeowner of Altadena until the Eaton fire burned my home without any assistance from any first responder. And I'm speaking on item 69D. A seven day review is not enough. The board routinely allows 60, 90 or even 120 days for report backs. Seven days is not enough for an issue of this magnitude. Please extend the timeline to at least 60 days so the FSRI findings can be thoroughly reviewed and the Altadena community can meaningfully participate.

I lost my home, my pets, my cars and all of my personal belongings in the Eden fire despite me staying until almost 6 a.m. fighting the fire with the fire hose. I need the county to understand that being abandoned during this horrific catastrophe despite paying property taxes for 30 years is unacceptable, inhumane, careless and despicable.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed51:27

Thank you next speaker.

CommentKara VallowProposedself-stated51:30

Hello, I'm speaking on behalf of 6090. My name is Kara Vallow with Altadena for Accountability. Following the release of the McChrystal report residents of Altadena have been researching gathering data engaging community members to get a full and accurate picture of what happened in January of 2025. FSRI confirmed what our research showed that LA County Fire, LASD and OEMs agencies policies and procedures did not support evacuation protocols.

You are giving us seven days to complete something that usually takes upwards of 60 days which is laughably inadequate. Extend the timeline, choose someone other than county council to lead this and please include our community members in your findings. Thank you.

0:52 – 0:568 turns

PresenterPaloma BustosSunita Jane Anti-Trafficking Initiative at Loyola Law School and I'm speaking onProposedself-stated52:24

Good morning, my name is Paloma Bustos with the Sunita Jane Anti-Trafficking Initiative at Loyola Law School and I'm speaking on item 44. We appreciate the county's work to improve its response to child trafficking yet the current first responder protocol still focuses heavily on CSEC. We are now in year two of the county's five year strategic plan and the protocol still has not been updated to reflect all forms of child trafficking including labor trafficking and forced criminality. That update should also reconsider how youth first enter the response system. The county should place less focus on law enforcement as a first point of contact. Young people should be able to get help through trusted community organizations, outreach workers, schools and health care providers.

We also ask the board to have LASD to report back within 30 days on the cost of its work under the FRP. This should include estimated costs to identify and refer one youth and the estimated yearly costs of this work The information can help the county better understand its current response and where community-based approaches should be expanded. Thank you.

CommentMary Alice Pedersen TotalProposedself-stated53:22

Thank you, next speaker. Hi I'm Mary Alice Pedersen Total Loss Eaton Survivor speaking on agenda item 69D that report from FSRI needs to be separated between the Palisades and Eaton it's crazy that they conflated the two of them there are two separate fires with two separate fire agencies. You need more time to analyze this report and accept it But what's already apparent is the Los Angeles County Fire Department, led by Chief Anthony Maroney failed Altadena. Failed to have any advance planning for an obvious emergency. Failed to respond to the fire.

Failed to do anything strategic to protect our town and ran away to the Rose Bowl Command Center where they could no longer even see the fire. Our first demand for accountability is for Chief Anthony Moroney to be fired or to step down in shame immediately. He should not be collecting an $800,000 a year salary. He should be stepped down and also maybe be tried for manslaughter. There is no universe where anybody who performed that badly should be allowed to fail again. We need a citizen board to oversee this fire department that wastes money and doesn't know how to fight a fire.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed54:25

Thank you We will now go back to remote speakers. Cassandra Garcia, please state the agenda item you're speaking on and begin.

PresenterCassandra GarciaPunta Hills Habitat Authority that is a joint power authority organization thatProposedself-stated54:35

Good morning I will be speaking on item number 30 in favor of my name is Cassandra Garcia. I'm a board director of the Punta Hills Habitat Authority that is a joint power authority organization that manages nearly 4000 acres of the Punta Hills as a nature preserve. Thank thank you to Supervisor Hahn and Hilda Solis for moving this The board of directors supports this item fully. They understand and support affordable housing needs for the city of La Habra, and they support us in acquisition of two acres directly from the county as a buffer for the Harbor Boulevard, while the underpass The underpriced project was a great project between the county and Habitat Authority 20 years ago, which is very successful and the first of its kind in L.A., and we encourage the Board of Supervisors to approve this item.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed55:26

Thank you, Andrea Gullo. Please state the agenda item you're addressing and begin.

PresenterAndrea Gallo I'mthe Quinta Hills Habitat PreseProposedself-stated55:33

Hello my name is Andrea Gallo I'm speaking in favor Thank you. Thank you for the introduction of item 30. My name is Andrea fellow, I am the executive director of the Quinta Hills Habitat Preservation Authority or a joint powers authority between the county of L A city of Whittier in the sanitation district and also include talking to heights. We managed nearly 4000 acres in the point a hill that the nature preserve with 23 miles We're also thankful for Supervisor Solis as well, and the Board of Directors of the Habitat Authority fully supports this item. They understand the needs of affordable housing and they support the direct sale of two acres directly from the county to the Habitat Authority.

We look at this as a win-win compromise, and we encourage the Board of Supervisors to approve this item. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed56:29

Thank you. That concludes our time for public comment on these items.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role56:32

Supervisor Barger, are you recognized?

0:56 – 0:581 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed56:34

Thank you and I want to acknowledge the concerns raised by the community and fire survivors that came here today. And we do hear you, and I just want you know the seven day timeline in the motion was set intentionally to reflect the urgency this moment demands but their thoroughness is important. We need to be thorough in terms of how we go about reconciling the reports both the state and the McChrystal report if our departments need additional time To deliver a comprehensive analysis and extension is absolutely granted. So the seven day was really more to mirror the sense of urgency on this so make no mistake it's important for us to be clear that also County Council's role has been some concerns about County Council's role They are not the sole evaluator.

They are serving strictly in coordination to align the various departments involved in the past reviews, including those who participated in the governor's review because that's what this is reconciling with the state brought forward and what the county has has in their report. Although county staff was interviewed for this AAR we did not see this report until it was released last week. The sole purpose of today's motion is to deliver an objective matrix Highlighting where the county aligns and where we diverge so that this board, and the public, and you all, and the survivors, the people that are still suffering have clear facts in hand moving forward.

For long term tracking and oversight, Supervisor Horvath and I already directed the county CEO to assign a dedicated point person responsible for monitoring the implementation across all after action report recommendations and report back to this board regularly, including to the community through our town council and through the collaborative. Community voices have been and will continue to be central to recovery just as they were throughout the county's McChrystal review. So I am happy to strike the seven and make it a 30 day with the understanding that departments can come back and ask for extensions based on the need but please know this This board, and it's not just the 5th district as you pointed out. It's a county as a whole is represented here and we all support the need to get the facts and get the answers so I appreciate y'all coming down today.

Thank you Madam Chair.

0:59 – 1:069 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role59:00

Thank you executive office.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction59:04

Madam chair and members of the board. The following items are before you. Items 1 through 912 and 1315 through 1921. 23 to 41, 43 through 69E, 1D and 2D. Please note we will take a separate vote on item 72. The items are before you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role59:27

Thank you. Moved by Supervisor Horvath, seconded by Supervisor Barger to approve the items with the exceptions noted by the executive officer. Executive Officer please call the roll.

Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 Moved by Lindsey P. Horvath · Seconded by Barger Moved by Supervisor Horvath, seconded by Supervisor Barger to approve the items with the exceptions noted by the executive officer. Executiv
Show transcript
Supervisor Horvath? Aye. Supervisor Hahn? Yes. Supervisor Barger? Supervisor Solis. Aye.
CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction59:48

Motion carries. Madam Chair, we will now vote on the separate matter item. This item is adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of Los Angeles Unified School District general obligation bonds. Item 72 is before you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:00:03

Moved by Supervisor Hahn, seconded by Supervisor Horvath to approve the item. Executive Officer please call the roll.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 Moved by Janice Hahn · Seconded by Lindsey P. Horvath Moved by Supervisor Hahn, seconded by Supervisor Horvath to approve the item. Executive Officer please call the roll.
Show transcript
Supervisor Horvath? Aye. Supervisor Hahn? Aye Supervisor Barger, aye. Supervisor Solis, aye.
CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction1:00:19

Motion carries. We will now

move on to item 10 implementing Assembly Bill 1646 the HUG Act in Los Angeles County which was held by Supervisor Hahn. For members of the public on the phone if you've already signed up to speak no further action is needed If you're on the phone and wish to comment but haven't signed up, press star and follow the prompts to join the speaking queue. To address the board from the meeting call 213-444-2600, press star and follow the prompts. An operator will assist you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:00:56

Thank you. And with that, Supervisor Hahn this is your item.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction1:01:00

Thank you Madam Chair and I want to welcome Assemblymember Isaac Bryan with us this morning. You know today is something worth celebrating in a county where it seems that we have one tragedy or one disaster after another. Today is a day that we can celebrate something simple but powerful. You know, colleagues for two years I've been going out to Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Downey monthly to have dinner with a group of incarcerated young people who have been advocating for something that every young person needs and deserves.

A hug from their mom And right now, our LA County Probation Department does not allow all youth in every facility to hug their loved ones during every visitation day. I first learned about this when these young people sent a giant poster to our board meeting a couple of years ago. That listed several requests, and the last one on the list was their ability to hug their moms. Well that broke my heart.

You know of course safety has to be our priority but there should be room for these young people to safely hug their visitors. I brought this to our probation department but was met with resistance. So we went another route and Assemblymember Isaac Bryan came to Los Padrinos, heard for himself and began to meet and talk with the young people. And worked side-by-side with them to write the HUG Act.

After months of advocacy, the HUG Act passed both the Assembly and the Senate. And just over a week ago it was signed into law by our Governor Newsom. It will take effect on January 1st of 2027. This is the first time in California history that incarcerated youth helped to write a bill that has now become law. And since our probation department does not allow hugs at every visit and sometimes even uses visitation as reward or punishment, they must now take steps to ensure a smooth transition so that hugs are allowed at all facilities during all visitation hours without sacrificing safety and security. So this motion before us aims to ensure that our probation department is prepared as possible First, it's going to direct our department to update the visitation policy and create written materials that reflect this change in the law.

And it also directs our department to report back to us in 60 days with their compliance plan including a plan to document processes and to set clear and consistent expectations across all of our facilities. And while the state law states that contact visits must be limited if there's a significant safety or security concern, it also clearly states that contact visits cannot be restricted as a disciplinary measure and that any restriction must be documented. And I expect this policy to be laid out very clearly in the report back to us.

And the two other reports, one six months and then one a year after implementation will ask for data including contact visit participation feedback from our youth and their families. And the times contact visits were restricted. And finally, this motion directs our probation department to allow more in-person contact visits for the remainder of this calendar year before the law goes into effect. We don't need state law to let us do the right thing. But that will give us the opportunity to work out any challenges and ensure that we're prepared for full implementation on January 1st.

I want to thank my co-author to this motion, Supervisor Mitchell who's not here with us today. And of course Assemblymember Isaac Bryan who shared real concerns with our young people Who showed compassion and courage by partnering with our incarcerated young people to write this incredible legislation. And carry it across the finish line up in Sacramento, you know colleagues.

There are few things that we can do in life that really do make a difference. This is going to be one of them and for the youth who are incarcerated in our facilities, to their families, to the young people like Lawrence who are now out of incarceration many times I know you feel forgotten, you feel neglected And this is a testament to your vision that things can be and should be better. Maybe not for some of you who are already out, but for those who will come after you. And before I ask Chief Arcos to say something, I wanted to turn the floor over to one of my personal heroes, Assemblymember Isaac Bryan.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:06 – 1:229 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed1:06:47

Thank you, Madam Supervisors and thank you to the entire board. It has been nearly 10 years since I sat at this desk and three of you remember fondly perhaps not fondly the many years that I came in testified on Tuesday's and two of you have never seen me here before. It's good to be back for something so righteous and something so right. When I first went into Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall last December, I thought I was just going to be playing basketball I thought I was going to play basketball with some young people right before Christmas, and it was going to give me some hope and it was going to give them some hope.

And when I spent the entire day learning their stories and learning from them, I was pulled into a corner by three young people in the R1 unit who told me an incredible story about how this Board of Supervisors under Advocacy of Supervisor Hahn changed the toothpaste in Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall and how much that meant to them. I mean, a game changer for these young people.

And I asked them, I said you know is there more work that we could do? What else would you change? And they looked me square in the face and said it'd be really nice if I could hug my mom when she came to visit me. And it broke my heart immediately one because it was the holidays two because I didn't know that was a thing And I should have known it was a thing because they sent a poster to the board four years prior and eight years before today, it was in a report on ending childhood poverty and improving the conditions of welfare for our young people in California.

And so we began to work. I think on the spot, I told them well, I'm gonna write a bill and we're gonna do this together and you're gonna change the conditions of your own confinement while incarcerated and I need all your mama's phone numbers. And those mothers and those families came to Sacramento all year long, and their advocacy and their testimony turned AB 1646 into a piece of bipartisan legislation. This wasn't a deep debate in Sacramento. You couldn't hear the righteousness and the goodness of the HUG Act and not feel compelled to join in this movement that had been started by incarcerated young people.

The fact that it is now law in California makes California the first state in the country to give young people who are incarcerated the right to physical contact, the right to hug their loved ones. And I think that is powerful. In fact, it's probably the most powerful thing that the youth who are incarcerated in L.A. County have done so far in their young lives. But my hope is that this work and their advocacy inspires them not just to become better contributors to the County of Los Angeles, but to change the conditions of life for all of us for the positive. And so I want to thank the Board of Supervisors. I want to thank Supervisor Hahn and Supervisor Mitchell for authoring this motion because you are right Madam Supervisor, the County of Los Angeles does not need the state to force it to implement physical touch and hugs for young people.

We can make those strides and advancements on our own. In fact, a pilot has already started here in LA County and I'm incredibly proud of the leadership of the county for starting that pilot and I think we can do better. And so I wanted to join you here today to lend my voice in support of this effort and to continue to bring the voices of the young people who are incarcerated in Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall who wrote this legislation with me into the halls of power and respectfully ask for your support of this motion today.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction1:10:16

Thank you, and I think the other lesson for me is it doesn't matter where you are in life. You can use what you have to change things. get here, or once I get a better job, or once I get out of incarceration, or once I do this. And a lot of people wait their whole lives waiting for that perfect scenario where they feel like they can be empowered to do something This hug act shows that these young men in incarceration, you know behind walls behind bars chose with you to take that moment and work to better the lives of those who will come after them. It's an incredible story it's an incredible testament to what you can do when you You know, work together to change things. So thank you for that. I just wanted to ask Deputy Chief Arcos and thanks again to your team for the work they've done to already begin to host some visits allowing hugs at the facilities.

I know that we'd had hugs on Valentine's Day, Mother's Day most recently on Labor Day, for example And I know that these hugs have been made possible because we've worked hard to, the biggest challenge was safety and security. And we've really done a good job and I commend you on enhancing our security measures. So my question for you and just for the audience is can you tell us how you're getting prepared to implement this law by January 1st?

PresenterChief Deputy Robert ArcosChief Vieira RosaProposedself-stated1:12:14

Thank you and good morning Chair Solis, Supervisor Horvath, Supervisor Barger and Supervisor Hahn. Thank you for the opportunity to be here today. I'm Chief Deputy Robert Arcos on behalf of Chief Vieira Rosa. I am also joined today by our communications manager Vicky Waters and Special Assistant Veronica Castillo who have been instrumental in the work this past year on reshaping the visitation policy.

So we have been working steadily to implement Assembly Bill 1646, the HUG Act, to meet the date of January 1st, 2027. We understand and support the importance of a visitation policy that recognizes strong family connections as essential to a young person's well-being, rehabilitation and successful reentry. As we are preparing to implement AB1646, we are building upon this work to provide consistent opportunities for appropriate and consensual physical contact during visitation while maintaining a safe and secure environment for youth, families and staff. I would like to also acknowledge and thank our partners who have contributed to this work. We are grateful to the Probation Oversight Commission including Executive Director Wendy Julian, Dr.

Sarah Gangora and Commissioner Tyreke Shipp for their continued engagement and thoughtful input as we reshape the department's visitation policy. We also appreciate the technical assistance and research and feedback provided by the Office of Youth and Community Restoration including Cole Lancaster, Mark Varela, Annie Sosich and Alyssa Hartz. And lastly I'd like to also thank our department's ad hoc committee representing our SYTF juvenile halls and camps for their thoughtful and insightful input. Their engagement has been instrumental in helping the department move this work forward.

Most importantly this transition represents a broader cultural shift within the department. Family is not separate from rehabilitation it is central to rehabilitation By strengthening family connections, we are supporting the young people in our care while also investing in safe, healthier and more connected communities throughout Los Angeles County. The board's direction establishes several key areas of implementation I'd like to provide an update on each.

Revision of the department's visitation policy. The department began this work with a model visitation policy language provided by OICR on December 8th 2025, which supported and informed the department's policy development. On April 9th of 2026, the department began updating its visitation policy to recognize family members and supportive adults as vital partners in a young person's rehabilitation and preparation for reentry.

As part of that transition, the department began permitting hugs with the approval from the chief probation officer on designated holidays including Mother's Day, Father's Day Fourth of July Memorial Day and Labor Day. The department is now completing the next phase of this work. The revised visitation policy will eliminate the requirement for prior approval of contact visits by the chief probation officer. Under the revised policy, contact visitation will become a regular form of visitation consistent with AB 1646.

The department is committed to finalizing the revised policy and having it ready for implementation by January 1st, 2027. Informing youth and families of their rights, the board has also directed the department to develop written materials informing youth and parents of their right to physical contact during visitation. And making clear that contact visitation will not be restricted as a disciplinary consequence.

The department's communications section is developing informational and educational materials explaining those rights and the department's contact visitation policy. These materials will be made available through multiple channels including the departments online platforms postings at probation facilities, and direct distribution to youth and parents. The materials will clearly communicate that physical contact visitation is a right.

The materials will be finalized and disseminated in accordance with the January 1st, 2027 implementation deadline. Progressive expansion of contact visitation, the department is also responding to the board's direction to progressively increase in-person contact visitation at juvenile facilities during the remainder of 2026. To support this transition, the department will gradually expand contact visitation with a majority of the remaining visitation opportunities in 2026 permitted to take place as contact visits.

This measured approach will allow the department to expand access while ensuring that facilities, staff, youth and families are prepared for the full implementation of the revised visitation policy. Protocols and procedures for implementation. That plan includes protocols addressing several important areas. Youth choice. Youth may choose not to participate in contact visit at any point during the visit.

A youth decision to decline physical contact will not affect the youth's ability to participate in future visits. Disciplinary consequences, contact visitation will not be restricted or denied as a disciplinary consequence. This is a fundamental component of the department's revised approach to visitation. Safety and security, the department recognizes that there may be circumstances involving a specific and significant safety or security concern that may require temporary restriction of contact visitations. In those circumstances, the department will establish standards and documentation requirements to ensure that any restriction is based on a specific and significant safety or security concern appropriately justified, properly documented, and applied consistently.

Consistency across facilities, the department is establishing clear expectations procedures and staff guidance to promote consistent implementation across all juvenile facilities. Our objective is to ensure that youth and families understand their visitation rights and that staff have clear and consistent direction regarding contact visitation. The ongoing reporting accountability, the first report will be submitted by July 1st 2027 and the second by January 1st 2028. Each report will include at a minimum Visitation participation by family, feedback from youth and families. The number of instances in which contact visitation was restricted and the basis for each restriction.

These reports will provide the board with measurable information regarding implementation access to contact visitation, family and youth experiences and the department's continued progress. In closing as we move forward towards full implementation of AB 1646 on January 1st 2027, the department remains committed to balancing two important responsibilities Supporting meaningful family connections and maintaining a safe and secure environment for youth, families, and staff.

We believe these goals are not competing objectives when appropriately structured and consistently implemented meaningful family contact can be important part of rehabilitation and successful reentry. I want to express the department's sincere appreciation to the Board of Supervisors, Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, the team at Hoops for Justice and lastly the 32 young adults who were involved in this project.

We remain committed to implementing AB 1646 fully and thoroughly strengthening family connections and advancing a probation system that is compassionate effective safe and centered on rehabilitation. Thank you for the opportunity to address you today.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction1:19:30

Wow, Bobby. I mean Deputy Chief Arcos. Assemblymember Ryan are you sitting there just amazed at what is coming out of a deputy chief of LA County Probations mouth? I'm blown away thank you for that. I mean you have to be like amazed. I've never heard those words come since i've been a supervisor from our probation department so I really appreciate it a lot

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed1:20:00

I've known Deputy Chief Arcos since our past days working for the City of Los Angeles, and if there's anybody with a heart for this kind of work it would be Deputy Chief Arcos. So thank you for that.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction1:20:10

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed1:20:11

Thank you Madam Chair.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:20:13

Supervisor Horvath? You recognized?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed1:20:15

Thank you Madam Chair. It's hard to on a very human level it's hard to believe that There was that our reality is that young people who are struggling, who are challenged in their growth and development did not have the opportunity to receive love and care as part of their rehabilitation. And yet the silver lining of that tragic reality is what I think has been an outstanding example of what happens when you center the people who need the help the most, when you wrap them in service and support, and legislative solutions that actually change their lives. That are driven by their informed perspective and supported by collaboration across governments That's the way it's supposed to work, every time.

And so I am grateful to my colleagues for bringing this motion forward. I'm especially grateful to Assemblymember Bryan for continuing to be an exemplary leader and showing especially our young people that their voices matter now, that they can change their world now. You are an example of that and I'm grateful for the work that you do in partnership with Los Angeles County And I'm glad to know that this change not only means that whatever is clearly defined within this law will change, but that the spirits inside the young people who will have this experience now are changing too and that they will see that opportunity is theirs for the taking.

And so I'm really glad to have this brightest of spots in our very dark times these times. But, I know our young people are really the light that will show the way and I'm glad that we were able to follow their lead. Thank you.

1:22 – 1:308 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:22:08

Thank you, and I want to thank Supervisor Hahn and Mitchell also for helping this board better understand what the bill's entirety really encompassed. And back a few months ago we agreed to support this as our legislative priority for the board but I want to thank you also Assemblymember Isaac Bryan. You don't surprise me when you ran for office and I'll never forget an interview you did Forget it was Spectrum or one of those programs. And I was compelled to hear your story, your own struggles and the fact that you also had a whole lot of challenges in your own life. So to have members in the Assembly and the Senate understand real-life experiences, I think is just an added plus for the state and for our communities. And because you care so deeply about young people because you've been through your own harsh realities The struggles and it's always good to have people who will be champions alongside with you.

And I want to congratulate the young people that helped to write this legislation, so a big applause to you and for your tenacity as well because if nothing is easy to get through in Sacramento and to get it signed by and get bipartisan support wow That you probably really had jerked some hearts there and for the other side of the aisle to also agree is really incredible. But it's a common sense thing, I mean when I heard about you can't hug parents and vice versa does that mean you can't kiss your mom?

Or is that acceptable Mr. Arcos? Huh? Is that

PresenterChief Deputy Robert ArcosChief Vieira RosaProposedself-stated1:23:50

acceptable? They're doing it yes. A little peck on the cheek. A pat on the cheek okay.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:23:56

But I'm just saying, it's something as innocuous as that that can change young people's lives because they get to visit with their parents. or loved ones, and they can hug. We take that for granted in most of our lives. And I know that this is something that we have to continue to work on because there's still so many inequities that exist at our camps with the boys and the girls and the young men and young women. And i'll never forget when I first came to the board and visited East Lake that was still open there meeting some young people that didn't have appropriate toiletries Underwear, women, young girls.

And feminine products and shampoo and things of that nature. And even clothing that did not fit them. That was not made for young girls. All of that took time and years to change believe it or not but shouldn't be like that so I think we do have a new person at the helm at probation and you're also one of them Deputy Director, I'm happy to see that these reforms are happening but they do take time and that's the part I don't like. And I think a lot of us get frustrated but keep moving in that direction and I know with the help of the Assemblyman and other legislators hopefully we'll be able to see more reform quicker and just a simple notion of going and playing basketball and hearing young people talk about what they wanted is enough to make a change.

And that's what this is about, that's why Supervisor Hahn goes out there all the time and some of us join in that and have been going out there meeting with our young people and we hear them. So today as a testament congratulations to you, Supervisor Hahn and Mitchell and also The Assemblyman and to probation. Hopefully we can set a good example if this is the first of its kind in the country, that's pretty amazing.

So congratulations. Thank you. Thank you both. Supervisor Barger?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:26:01

Yes. Thank you. Thank you for being the voice of reason and recognizing that this legislation was necessary, but I just want to say, I mean, I feel like common sense has left the room. I mean it shouldn't take legislation to your point and I appreciate, you know, the remarks that you've made but I've said this before and I'll say it again. It's not a question of if these youth are going to be released they are going to be released And our job is to provide a foundation and structure for them, not only inside but also when they get out. And studies show that parents especially mothers are a vital role model and someone who provides stability for our youth. And so to me this is a common sense legislation By an amazing representative, and I echo what Supervisor Hahn said about you.

You walk it, you talk it, and the legislation that you sponsored, I'm sure is just one of many that are going to be coming forward because we have a lot of work to do not only for those that we have in our care but also the ones that we don't even want to get into our system investing their future by ensuring that they do not end up in our system. And so it's not a question of either or, it's an and.

And I'm confident that we can do this and change the trajectory of the youth that are only in our system but those that are growing up and want to make changes. So thank you for Implementing this in our camps, in our halls. I think it's important and you hear from this board it reflects commitment to working with the families but also with the staff to educate them on the importance because many of them I don't think recognize the importance of these type of actions they hear a hug act and they think Kind of push it aside and say, what is a hug? A hug can mean a lot of things. But in this case, a hug can make the difference between a child feeling hope and feeling abandoned. So thank you very much. And thank you Supervisor Hahn and Supervisor Mitchell for bringing this forward.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:28:37

Thank you. Seeing no other questions from the board let's go to public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:28:44

Will the following individuals please come forward and staff will assist you. Helen Eigenberg, Carolina Goodman, Leah Zedler-Ordaz, Isabella Suleiman, Tyreke Shipp, Desiree Marufo, Lauren Danny, Emily Williams, Dolores Canales, Wendalyn Julian, Chris Adams, Lambert Higuera, Mercedes We will now go to our speaker. Roy Humphreys, your line is open. Please begin.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed1:29:51

Thank you very much. Thanks for all the good things you do and something that see I've been involved in the Los Angeles County now for 50 years okay? And my brother was a Los Angeles County Sheriff for Wayside Max for three years. He only has two but he's so good they extended him a year out there and he worked West El or East LA I ask you, what in the hell were your board members doing over that 50 years that brought us to today? So congratulations for the good things and the good outcome. But again, what the hell went on for 50 years? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:30:39

Thank you. Caller, your line is open. Please state your name and begin.

1:30 – 1:4117 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 30Proposed1:30:46

Yes, I'm disappointed that there's been a lack of acknowledgement to the incidents that caused no physical contact to be put into place. And in light of that, I am hoping that there is some type of audit to be reported, let's say July 2027, the incidence of illegal contraband, illegal drugs and overdoses that are taking place compared to the same period of time where there was no physical contact. That would show In writing the results, if those who are currently being allowed to have the physical contact, if they're going to use that to their best advantage to better their lives or simply continue on their way. Thank you for your consideration.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:31:36

Thank you. We will now go to in-person

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 31Proposed1:31:39

speakers, please begin. Good morning supervisors. Carolina Goodman, League of Women Voters of Greater Los Angeles. Thank you Supervisors Hahn and Mitchell for the motion that would ensure the HUG Act will be ready and implemented by January 1. That the probation department will begin ramping up in-person contact visits in all juvenile facilities now, and that accountability measures will be established.

I have a quote to share from one of our youth in detention. The HUG Act means you get looked at by the county as a human being. You're not just judged by what you're charged with. It also means that you get to be consoled by loved ones. You know that civic engagement is a priority for the League of Women Voters. The HUG Act is an inspiration for all young people to be actively involved in shaping good government. Thank you.

CommentHelen EigenbergProposedself-stated1:32:37

Good morning, my name is Helen Eigenberg. I'm a resident of SD3 and I'm here to support item 10 and I thank Supervisor Honda-Mitchell for writing the motion. It's important that our voices are heard today but there's a group of voices that I want to make sure we hear because they can't be here today. A voice from one of our youth at Los Padrinos. When I cannot hug my family during visits it makes me feel like giving up and crashing out.

So I am asking all of you today to support these young people and their families and vote unanimously for this motion. Let's continue leading the state, thank you.

CommentLeah Zeidler-AdazProposedself-stated1:33:14

Thank you next speaker. Hi good morning supervisors my name is Leah Zeidler-Adaz and i'm with Urban Peace Institute. Thank you Supervisors Hahn and Mitchell for authoring this motion to support the amazing and historic work of incarcerated youth inside LA County's juvenile facilities I want to start by sharing a quote from one of the young people who authored the bill. I think Carolina also shared it, the HUG Act means you get looked at by the county as a human being not just what you're charged with. Two things that struck me when thinking about what this young person said but the right to loving touch is what it means to be a person and it shouldn't have taken this long for the state or the county to recognize it And number two, I also want to challenge the notion that safety and security comes with restriction, drug sniffing dogs and metal detectors and lack of touch.

Young people hugging their moms is safety and security. Young people holding hands with their loved ones is safety and security. Please vote yes on this motion. Thank you so much. Thank you next speaker.

PresenterIsabella SolomonAnti-Recidivism CoalitionProposedself-stated1:34:17

Good morning, Supervisors. My name is Isabella Solomon. I am a formerly incarcerated woman, a mother and the Associate of Policy with the Anti-Recidivism Coalition. But today, more than anything I'm speaking to you as a mom. I know what incarceration feels like. I know what it feels like to lie in a bed behind walls and miss your children so badly that you would give anything for five minutes just to hold them.

Not to talk about your case, not to talk about what went wrong, not to explain yourself, just to hold your babies. There's a particular kind of heartbreak that comes with loving someone you cannot reach, especially when that someone is your child. And that is what I want you to think about when you vote on item 10. Think about a mother walking into visitation and seeing her child. Maybe the world calls that child an offender, maybe a case file reduces them to a number, a charge or the worst decision they have ever made but that mother doesn't see a case file. She sees the baby she once rocked to sleep. She sees a little kid who used to reach for her when they were scared. She sees her child.

What are we teaching?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:35:19

Thank you next speaker.

CommentDesiree MarufoProposedself-stated1:35:21

Hello, my name is Desiree Marufo. I work with Hoops for Justice. Thank you Supervisor Hahn and Mitchell for authoring this motion. And I'm going to keep it short and simple. The Hug Act guarantees just that basic human right to be able to hug your families during one of the most hardest times in your life. Please pass this motion to make sure that it's implemented in L.A. County as soon as possible. Thank you.

Next speaker.

CommentLauren DannyProposedself-stated1:35:46

Good morning, my name is Lauren Danny and I'm here in support of AB 1646 the Hug Act. I wear many hats today on your United States of America's Ms 2026 but once a week to a very special group of young men. I'm volunteer with hoops for justice and Barry J night or juvenile Hall. It's my favorite hat to wear and the best part of my week is seeing these young men with vested interest in their rehabilitation. And completing our day with a hug truly solidifies a real connection between us, and it is something every human deserves to have especially the families who support these youth through years of detention incarceration and are truly looking to heal. Please consider making sure the Hug Act can happen as soon as possible, so these men can continue their journey to successful reentry into our population.

Our students have said a hug makes them feel human again. Let's give our kids back their humanity. Thank you to this board and probation. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:36:44

Thank you. Next speaker.

CommentTyreke ShippProposedself-stated1:36:46

Good morning Board of Supervisors, my name is Tyreke Shipp. I'm the SD3 rep on the Probation Oversight Commission and also the Policy Program Manager at the Anti-Recidivism Coalition. Two years ago I joined the commission and I had the opportunity to go inside a Los Padrinos shortly after I joined and learn from the young men that they couldn't hug their families Around 20 years ago, my brother was incarcerated in Los Padrinos and to his shocking belief he could hug his family at the time. And so how do we become more restrictive over time? I think you know the HUG Act is it the first step into us really recognizing youth justice reimagined really recognizing a least restrictive society and helping our young people develop Today my brother he sits as a father of five.

He has two jobs. He's a college graduate And he works really hard, but he was once one of these young people and he hugged my dad in that same facility that young people were not able to hug. I think it's important for the board to vote yes on this and I think we should continue to do work on visitation. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:37:44

Thank you next speaker.

PresenterLamarty GuerraDirector of Development with Hoops for JusticeProposedself-stated1:37:46

Good morning. My name is Lamarty Guerra. I serve as a Director of Development with Hoops for Justice. I am here in support of the HUG Act. I have worked directly with incarcerated youth who helped write this legislation, and I have heard firsthand how impactful it is for them to be able to hug their loved ones. I believe that hugs should not be a privilege but a right, and implementing the HUG Act as soon as possible would be a huge step in the right direction.

Thank you, Supervisor Hahn, Supervisor Mitchell and Assemblymember Isaac Bryan for their important work and leadership on this issue.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:38:22

Thank you next speaker.

CommentDolores CanalesProposedself-stated1:38:24

Good afternoon, my name is Dolores Canales. I am chair of the Probation Oversight Commission appointed by Board of Supervisors Janice Hahn and today is a good day. Today is a good day in LA and I'm so thankful to Supervisor Hahn and Supervisor Mitchell for this motion that they have put on the agenda and I'm thankful also I want to extend my gratitude for Supervisor Horvat, Solis and Barger for your supportive comments already.

We all have heard the comments and we know every single one to be true, so I'm going to use my time to read a direct quote from one of the youth inside who I've had the great honor to get so many hugs from. And the youth has said, The Hug Act reminds me how loved I am by my parents. So today thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 32Proposed1:39:14

Thank you, next speaker. Good morning Wendy Julian I am the Executive Director of your Probation Oversight Commission about a year ago when the POC began observing visitation led by commissionership and Chair Dolores Canales we were looking at a lot of problems in the facility not just about hugs but also about parents being turned away not always treated consistently and i'm very pleased to say that over the last year the department has made incredible strides in improving visitation access beyond just the pilot program of physical contact. And it's much to do with the work of Deputy Chief Arcos and Veronica Castillo who are here today that you heard from.

The department has been able to make changes that allow parents to come in, and we've heard that directly from the parents as well as from young people we've interviewed. The HUG Act is a perfect next step. It aligns completely with the POC's visitation report and recommendations, and we're happy to support on implementation. Keeping youth hopeful and prepared to return to their families, and keeping them connected to their families is public safety. Thank you. Thank You next speaker

PresenterShavonda Perry I'mmy son Damian Gilmore who was currently incarcerated iProposedself-stated1:40:19

Hello everyone my name is Shavonda Perry I'm here supporting item number 10 I'm Shavonda Perry I am from Los Angeles California speaking on behalf of my son Damian Gilmore who was currently incarcerated inside a LA County facility The HUG Act is deeply personal to me My son is one of the young people who co-authored the bill from inside the facility, and I was honored to fly to Sacramento to testify in support of the bill. I'm so proud to stand here today to celebrate the hard work of the youth and most importantly share what the HUG Act will mean to families like mine. In our current system we tell young people we want them to rehabilitate yet they are denied the most basic form of human Thank you, next speaker.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:41 – 1:5116 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 33Proposed1:41:25

Hi, I'm Mercedes and I support this Hug Act and truly stand by it. I was a mother who couldn't hug my son for four-and-a-half years. The pain when I left Los Padrinos for my son and I is something I don't want your mother or you to endure. So if we could push this as soon as possible the holidays are coming and we know that means love and family. So those youth deserve hugs and more. I support this inflammation 1,000. Thank you first off to our youth who dedicated and did this, our supervisors, assembly members, and our advocates that are there day in and out. This wouldn't be possible with you all. As a mother, I appreciate you guys for what you've done, and I love you all. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker?

CommentSylvester SerranoProposedself-stated1:42:18

Good morning, my name is Sylvester Serrano. I'm co-founder of Sacred Purpose. As formerly incarcerated, I remember one of the things that I looked forward to even though I pretended to be tough, callous, I would look forward to that hug from my mother. I needed that comfort. I needed that reassurance that I was going to be okay. And she gave it to me and it was the first time that I really felt my mother letting me know because in our culture sometimes we don't, we can't express our love with words and we do it with affection.

and me hugging her, I think she needed the hug just as much as I did. And it hurts me, it breaks my heart to know that our young people are sitting in there not being able to hug their families especially when they need that hug the most. That's probably a reason why they're there because they feel unloved, they feel unworthy, they feel rejected by society and this is why I support this bill. Thank you very much.

PresenterJose CatalanNew Way of Life Re-Entry ProjectProposedself-stated1:43:22

Hi, good morning supervisors. My name is Jose Catalan. I'm a community organizer with the New Way of Life Re-Entry Project. I am here in big support of implementing AB 1646 as soon as possible. As someone that has experienced many years with lack of human contact, I know how important this is and I believe having that meaningful contact with their families is the first step for these youth to start healing so thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:43:51

Thank you. Next speaker.

CommentChris AdamsProposedself-stated1:43:54

Good morning, my name is Chris Adams and I'm here to support the motion to implement the HUG Act. First, I want to thank Supervisors, Supervisor Hong and Supervisor Mitchell for bringing this motion forward. I had the privilege of working on AB 1646 and what makes this bill so special is that it came from incarcerated youth at Los Patrinos. They asked for something very simple They asked to be able to hug their families.

One quote from one of the incarcerated youths is, and I quote, The Hug Act reminds me how loved I am by my parents, end quote. That's what this is all about. A hug should not be a privilege or something taken away as punishment. These young people spoke up, California listened, and now I'm asking LA County to listen too. Please support the motion to implement the HUG Act. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:44:56

Thank you, next speaker.

CommentAlbert Rodriguez I'mProposedself-stated1:44:59

Hi my name is Albert Rodriguez I'm here to support the HUG Act. I'm one of the incarcerated youth just getting out and I was sitting in Sacramento helping out with this bill as well. I just want to say thank you for giving us the opportunity to hear our voice most of all the fellas' voice that could not make it today. It's very important for us Have love inside there no matter what circumstances that we have, you know? So I want to thank the supervisors. I want to thank all the teams that helped us out with this and most of all just our spirits and most of all God. I just want to say God bless y'all and hope y'all enjoy your day today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:45:39

Thank you. Next speaker.

CommentLawrence BowieProposedself-stated1:45:42

Hello everybody, my name is Lawrence Bowie. I'm just glad to be here to speak on something personal with me. First off, I'd like to say thank you to Supervisor Janice Hahn for really being that support for us youths that's inside the facilities and for Supervisor Mitchell for also helping us get this bill passed. For me, this bill is so special to me because I'm one of the co-authors. So I was one of the people that was inside the Los Reginos Juvenile Hall facilities. I remember when Jonathan first came in there. I remember Hoops for Justice first day. So just coming together and be outside to do this work what I'm doing. And I'm a youth advocate now And I got to speak at safety committees in Sacramento, go talk lobbying there for the HUD guy can avoid sex.

So just doing the work that I do and it's just inspiring for me and not only me the youths that are inside that do still call my phone and see how I'm doing check on me and they just see them hitting the ground running so I'm getting them inspiration and I'm showing them different sides. So thank you for all this and I appreciate it. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:46:41

Thank You next speaker

CommentOscar MejiaProposedself-stated1:46:42

My name is Oscar Mejia, I'm with Welcome Home Oasis. I run a less restrictive program out in the city of Long Beach. I grew up in foster careless for Geno's Central Berry J. I grew up in a family where hugs were never invited so I never really knew what I was missing out on However, now that I'm a very huggy person when you come into the home at Welcome Home Oasis you will be receiving about 16 hugs just to clarify that we are hugging family.

But nevertheless, I go to Barry J at least four times out of the week since the last time I was Bender as a kid change is happening. I am proud of probation. I am proud of everybody who is here as a community. I just want to acknowledge that, that change is happening and it's really beautiful that we're all working as a community and not against each other regardless of our backgrounds or titles or where we come from. It is happening today and this is a prime example of what it is when we all come together and work together. Thank you

CommentDionna PortisProposedself-stated1:47:42

Thank you. Next speaker? Good morning, my name is Dionna Portis, a community member in support of the HUGS Act being implemented today. A hug may seem like a small act but for a young person separated from their family it can communicate something powerful. You are loved, you are not forgotten and you still matter. If rehabilitation is truly our goal we must create opportunities for families to heal reconnect and support their children not create greater distance between them. I would also like to read a quote from one of our youth at Los Padrinos, the Hug Act means everything to me it makes me feel human again to know that soon I will be able to hug my loved ones when it's been so long since I've had the chance to. I am incredibly thankful for our hard work and everything has paid off thank you.

Thank You next speaker

PresenterMarquis GarciaRuben Jose Garcia MartinezProposedself-stated1:48:33

Good morning everyone, my name is Marquis Garcia speaking on behalf of Ruben Jose Garcia Martinez. I am the older brother of Ruben Jose meaning what many of you have gotten the chance to meet him and know him on a personal basis he was the co-author of the bill and designed all the artwork with the bill super proud of him And just wanted to say thank you to everyone who has made this all possible.

I urge the County Board of Supervisors to continue to look into the facilities and the conditions to which these young people are privy to, and yeah, to help these kids return to their loving families. These are young people who have a lot to offer to society, and thank you guys all so much. We all are here to support implementing the HUG Act.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:49:24

Thank you. Next speaker, please.

CommentJohn GomezProposedself-stated1:49:27

Good morning supervisors. My name is John Gomez. I am a youth advocate for Hoops for Justice and Los Angeles Women's Board and all community-based organizations. I'm here today for my peers, my fellow peers who are in custody, myself, all the families, the mothers, the fathers And community members, I just want to get up here today to uplift the voice at the hug act excuse me uplift the hug act and not minimize the way that holds.

I think we accomplished a lot of good things getting this bill passed. And to be able to be part of this process, to get in the past, going to advocate in Sacramento. Going to testify in front of different committees. To go to speaking on panels and building connections along the way. I've met an abundance of people throughout California who are in support of the same thing.

For myself to say I can be a part of this it means the utmost to me and I'm here in support of the HUD Act.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 34Proposed1:50:28

Thank you. Next speaker? Good morning. Emily Williams, founding director of UCAN, a UCLA academic center focused on the health outcomes of childhood trauma and toxic stress. I support item 10, the motion to implement the HUG Act. In 2024, a major meta-analysis reviewed 137 research studies and confirmed that touch provides clear measurable health benefits for children and adults. Positive physical touch builds secure emotional bonds and fosters trust. Adolescence represents a critical window of neurological, psychological, and social mapping. When young people experience prolonged touch deprivation, it alters how they manage stress, process information and build adult relationships. In touch-deprived youth, cortisol levels remain chronically elevated.

This constant fight or flight biochemistry raises blood pressure, accelerates heart rate and weakens the secondary immune system. I am immensely proud of Lawrence, Andrew and all the young people who co-wrote the HUG Act. Thank you for your support of the HUG Act.

1:51 – 1:545 turns

CommentAndrew HidalgoProposedself-stated1:51:27

Good morning. My name is Andrew Hidalgo, a formerly incarcerated youth that helped write the HUG Act. We first got the inspiration to write the HUG Act by Supervisor Janice Hahn, who was there for us and showed up during the difficult times. Holidays, birthdays and et cetera. She gave us hope to write about things we needed like hugging our mothers, who to most think we don't need when incarcerated but when fighting battles some can never think of a hug is all we need. Thank you for thank you for justice Janice Hahn and all my brothers who helped write this bill. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:52:01

Thank you. Next speaker.

CommentBernice SinghProposedself-stated1:52:03

Good morning, I'm Bernice Singh the policy analyst with Legal Services for Prisoners of Children and All of Us or None but I'm also a mother to two teenagers who love my hugs. I'm here to uplift the voices of those who aren't here today with us with two quotes. The first one coming from a youth from Los Padrinos I feel like the HUG Act means a lot to me and other younger people in California who are incarcerated in other juvenile facilities throughout the state, who have not been able to have physical contact with loved ones. So I feel like for the first time in history no one would want to mess this up for their family so yeah it means a lot to me."

And my next quote is from Lori Perez-Leon, a mother with an incarcerated son who said, "'I am so thankful for this law, the advocates, and the assembly member. I can finally get to hug my son at visit. This means everything to me.'" Thank you. Thank you, next speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 35Proposed1:52:54

Good morning first and foremost I want to thank just this significant is very symbolic shift. I want to speak pretty much from three angles from the young person that Four decades ago, was in juvenile hall from the individual that was a parent visiting my nephew who I had custody of earning rest and peace in Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall. And as a very proud elder now practitioner and kudos to the young people assembly member Brian for bringing this forward.

I want to emphasize one thing is I reflected sitting here When I stepped foot into Juvenile Hall in 1987, November 2nd our older brother had just been murdered. If I ever needed touch to soothe me the gash, the hole, the rupture was then. So thank you all it's significant appreciate you.

PresenterAlana Prockand Co-Founder of Hoops for JusticeProposedself-stated1:53:55

Thank you next speaker Hello, my name is Alana Prock. I'm the Executive Director and Co-Founder of Hoops for Justice. I want to thank Supervisor Hahn and Supervisor Binchell for authoring this motion and I want to thank the entire board for voting in support of the bill unanimously. Throughout this process, the youth have expressed to us that this is the first time they felt truly heard by people with a power to make decisions that impact their life directly. I want to thank Assemblymember Isaac Bryan for authoring This bill and carrying their voice all the way to Sacramento. When we asked the young people what this meant to them, one of the young men said not being able to hug my mom feels dehumanizing allowing us to hug our loved ones will make us feel human again Another young person said it would make me feel loved again Like I mean something to someone and I am NOT forgotten.

I respectfully ask that you vote in support of this motion Thank you all so much

1:54 – 2:2212 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 36Proposed1:54:52

Thank You next speaker Good morning, Olivia Shields with Urban Peace Institute. I'm one of the lead advocates on the HUG Act. Thank you Supervisor Hahn and Supervisor Mitchell. I am proud to work closely with the young people who created this legislation and I'm going to close us off today with two letters written by the incarcerated authors of this bill for the California State Assembly Public Safety. The first letter was written by Keon who was the first youth to tell Assemblymember Bryan about the need for HUG in Los Padrinos.

I feel like this bill should get passed because I've been in LPGV for two years and my whole two years of being in here, I haven't been able to have physical contact with my mom and grandma. Put it like this if you had a kid who was incarcerated and you wasn't able to hug him during visiting time how would that make you feel? Just because we are incarcerated that does not mean we should get treated less than humans. I feel like even if this bill does pass in a year or two, if it gets passed for the future youth then it's worth it.

Second letter says, I just want to thank God for giving this bill a chance and taking time out of your days to even look into it. These hugs mean everything to us kids in Juvenile Hall and being a part of this movement means everything. Thank you again for hearing us out. Los Padrinos unit R2. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:55:54

Thank you Madam Chair and members of the board that concludes public comment on this item.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction1:56:01

Madam Chair, Item 10 is before you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:56:04

Thank you. Moved by Supervisor Hahn, seconded by Supervisor Horvath to approve the item. Executive Officer please call the roll.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 Moved by Janice Hahn · Seconded by Lindsey P. Horvath Moved by Supervisor Hahn, seconded by Supervisor Horvath to approve the item. Executive Officer please call the roll.
Show transcript
Supervisor Horvath? Aye. Supervisor Hahn? Absolutely yes. Supervisor Barger? Yes. Supervisor Solis? Aye
CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction1:56:25

Motion carries.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:56:43

You're welcome.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction1:56:44

Thank you to

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:56:45

everybody who came.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction1:56:47

We will now

move on to item 42, report on compliance with the Rosas Agreement which was held for report. For members of the public on the phone if you've already signed up to speak no further action is needed. If you're on the phone and wish to comment but haven't signed up, press star and follow the prompts to join the speaking queue. To address the board from the meeting call 213-444-2600, press star and follow the prompts. An operator will assist you.

Hugo Macias, Assistant Sheriff will make a presentation. Kathy Kennedy, Nicholas Mitchell Robert Huston, County Monitors and Dr. Timothy Belovich, Director of Correctional Health Services, Department of Health Services are available for questions. For the departmental speakers please state your name and title for the record when you address the board.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:57:47

OK, before we begin can I thank everyone again for coming. And we just want to hold the audience to know that we are now proceeding with our next item so if you could hold your discussions or go in the lobby that would be very helpful. We appreciate you. OK with that we're going to turn to our assistant sheriff Hugo Macias who's going to start with this presentation. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:58:10

Thank you, Supervisor, for that introduction. Once again, Hugo Macias, Assistant Sheriff over Custody Operations with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Today I'm here to present our progress report as required by Provision 1.4 which requires us, the department, to present to you our progress status for the first six months of 2025. With that being said, for those who may not know, ROSA establishes standards of how our forest is evaluated. It is audited by the panel to my right which looks at the two full quarters and they investigate Our use of force practices within our division. For those who may not know, ROSA was a federal lawsuit that was established after allegations of excessive force in the basin facilities. Those facilities encompass Men's Central Jail, the Inmate Reception Center and Twin Towers.

The court approved this measure in 2015 but it wasn't until 2018 when the compliance measures were established that we started being graded and evaluated on our compliance. The panel not only reviews our force but they conduct independent reviews of our policies, site visits and they look at some of our most problematic incidents during the review. In total there's 105 provisions, there's 402 compliance measures that makes up the settlement agreement. It's broken down into seven major categories as reflected here from our uses of force practices to inmate grievances and our administrative procedures.

With that being said, I wanted to make sure everyone understood our continuous progress we continue to make. We have a collegial relationship with our monitors. We meet not only on scheduled events but we have ongoing conversations throughout the year to address some of the challenges. Nonetheless in the last three reporting periods, we are hovering about 80% of our total compliance measures of which many have 90% thresholds It's a high threshold, nonetheless the department is committed to meeting those thresholds.

So for the 15th report we were at 80%, we progressed on the 16th report to 82% and of the most recent report we're at 78%. But to provide you some context on that... The reason we went down to 78% is because of the 19 provisions that are no longer being reported. This is something we advocated for after having multiple years of compliance. That request was submitted to the panel who accepted that request, it was presented by the presiding judge and he ordered that these 19 provisions no longer require monitoring. However, I want to make it very clear that the panel still retains a right to re-implement these 19 provisions should we deviate from course and do any setbacks. Had those 19 provisions still been part of evaluation, we would have been hovering at 83%.

And so the monitors also compliment that in the 15th report There were seven provisions that were non in compliance. We find that in today's report, there's only three incidents of which we differ in some of our assessment. Noteworthy nonetheless is how we continue to focus on our head strikes and for the very first time we've met that threshold never been done before in ROSA's history to reach the 90% threshold which are very proud of and we command all our staff assigned to custody division for sustaining that compliance.

Here's another major takeaway of the remaining 86 provisions. There are 40 provisions that we continue year after year showing compliance for the last three calendar years, we've shown ongoing progression on 40 of those 86 provisions that we hope in the future if we continue in this route those 40 provisions can also be requested to be non-reporting standards so we can focus on the remaining 26 and really focus on the areas that we fall short on. And the monitors have advocated on the most recent report that over the past several years, the panel has observed improvement in the thoroughness of our forest evaluations and identified violations which is coincides with ensuring equal accountability while praising good work.

One of the areas that we continue to focus through ongoing briefings, accountability training and leveraging technology has been the reduction in overall uses of force in the last decade. And just a point of fact so people understand context, in 2016 we were hovering around 16,000 individuals who are judicially remanded to our care. In 2025 we were hovering around I'm sorry, we were hovering around 13,000. Just to give you some comparison that would equate to about a 20% reduction in population yet three times we've had that reduction and overall uses of force from just over 1500 to 500 or close to 600 in 2025.

Category twos, which are a higher level of force which results in injury, documented injury as a result of contact with our staff. That has also been reduced to approximately 60%. And more importantly are the head strikes. We started tracking them in 2020 yet we still can see year after year a reduction and currently in 2025 we've seen a reduction of 52%. With that being said, the monitors continue to advocate and recognize your good work. They've indicated that in recent years the department has focused on reducing the number of head strikes utilized by our staff and those efforts have had a positive impact on the number of strikes in the downtown complex facilities and that is encouraging and we advocate and echo those same sentiments.

And so as far as accountability, the sheriff has been very clear that he wants to praise good work while also ensuring that we have equal accountability throughout our systems. Thank you to you. We've requested body-worn cameras for many years and I'm sure the monitors to my right would agree there's been many times that some of our reports by our young deputies who enter our systems have been vague or maybe Uh, less detail that is necessary. Body worn cameras will not provide an opportunity for more robust documentation specifically from the vantage point of our deputies as many of you may or may not know custody serves as a transitional period for everyone being on boarded to our department. They do several years and then they transition out to patrol or other specialized units.

So the level of expertise and understanding of policies, not only existing policy from the department but the 105 provisions, the 402 compliance measures it's just an abundance of information that they need to master. Nonetheless we continue to advocate for their ability to comply with those measures. As of this morning, we're hovering around 70% of our facilities with body-worn cameras. However, all the facilities who I'm here to report to you in the basin have been equipped with body-worn cameras. We're hopeful that by the end of the year all of our facilities which are the remaining facilities in PDC will all be equipped with body-worn cameras. Equally important was the fact that As we transition with new on boards of deputies, our supervisors meaning our sergeants who conduct the first level review also come into our system after promoting sometimes after many years of being outside a carceral setting.

We identify there was improvement in documentation and preserving of evidence and all the elements that are required through the ROSA settlement agreement. However, to ensure continuity we came to you. You supported the creation of a custody force investigation team all of which have become subject matter experts in all of our policies and the monitors who might right have recognized The well-rounded supervisory reports with details and preservation of evidence that sometimes was missed. And so, that's another level of accountability that we've established throughout division as a recent of October 2025. We recognize now that our first line supervisors meaning the sergeants are doing robust analysis of of investigation of those incidents. However, as they work their way up the chain of command it's creating a bottleneck.

We recognize that and we're doing things to resolve it. So in October 2025, we created a web-based platform. It's an interface system now that I have the ability as the Assistant Sheriff to understand where that investigation is, where is City and EIDL to ensure that it moves forward to meet some of the timeline thresholds. Equally important as far as accountability, there was nine incidents during that six months of 2025 that the department found violations in surrounding forest incidents. Of which eight of those individual cases were founded to be in violation and corrective action was implemented and individuals sustained suspensions or some type of corrective action for that. And so the panel once again acknowledges that the progress the department has made regarding Thorough force reviews and identify policies is encouraging them to us to ensure that that mirrors our efforts that were being implemented.

And one thing I wanted to share with you as far as how we ensure accountability continues, the custody force investigations team began responding out to the incident as of February of this year. We have heard the monitors, we've heard other outside Oversight entities recognizing that sometimes some of our reports were not perhaps fully completed by the end of shift. By having the forest investigation team take the full responsibility for that incident, they will ensure that any preservation of evidence to ensure that the continuity and integrity of the investigation is captured, they're making sure that it's conducted.

And so here's where I give you even more additional details in regards to head strikes and how deeply they're being reviewed. Not only do we have policy surrounding use of force for the department, we now have specific force when it comes to head strikes. What level of threshold needs to be met in order for an individual to resort to using personal weapons? As opposed to reverting to other tools on their gun belt, or more importantly on their waist belt for a custody setting. This with the presiding judge actually took part in this. We presented some of this information and these are the three factors that we met. Individuals have to be assaultive towards our staff. There has to be a potential for serious injury to them or others, or possibly death.

And more importantly the last threshold which other techniques were less effective for them to utilize meaning they couldn't create time and distance, they couldn't revert to other tools in their belt and therefore they had to resort to using personal weapons. For those who reach a higher threshold such as a Category 3 and those are when any impact weapon intentionally or unintentionally strikes an individual head, that gets evaluated at the highest level. It's not investigated within our division. It is investigated by the department's Internal Affairs Bureau in which therefore they have full autonomy to do the investigation thoroughly and then they report their findings to us. And that includes any deliberate reckless causing injury to someone's head or if anyone receives any type of injury including skeletal fractures requiring someone to be admitted to a hospital And this just gives you the next column, gives you an overview of our force practices.

On-scene supervisors have the responsibility to collect any and all evidence. Notifications need to be made if it meets a Category 2 or Category 3 threshold to understand who will be taking responsibility of that investigation. More importantly we also have weekly reviews by the respective chief of that division who sits with their command staff To review any category 2 use of force from the prior week to identify if there's any concern. So we're not waiting till the investigation is completed, they have the ability to identify and highlight issues at which point they can address I need this to be a formal investigation whether it's a unit level and or for internal affairs investigation to conduct it furthermore we have the panel to my right who conducts independent reviews of such cases and once again they review the most problematic.

And OIG, who I don't believe is here today but the Office of Inspector General has free access to all our footage DVTAL incidents they have access to a lot of our files and therefore they have independent actions to do any type of assessment at any given time The right column on to my right provides you an overview of not accountability doesn't always have to rely on formal discipline. If we identify issues with tactics, supervision, care subsequent to an incident requiring medical, we make sure that corrective action plays a role either in debriefings, counseling training or what have you if there's discipline that warrants formal discipline Then by all means that is going to include pre-tactics and post-tactics that may be included, which we often do address during our review.

And of course we're gonna have incidents where the panel and the department differs but even in those cases there the gap is narrowing and even in the areas where all provisions are not met and maybe there's a difference, there's corrective action nonetheless that gets done in many of these cases do happen, and the panel recognizes that. And we continue to have robust conversations surrounding those efforts.

So here's specific information in regards to our head strikes. Head strikes are down 65% since 2021, and we recognize that we started tracking them in 2020 but we wanted to show you the last five years. So we went from 82 to 29, and this just doesn't give it any credit for the amount of contacts that our staff has on a daily basis. So we wanted to recognize a good thing that they We were really good at documenting bad incidents and anything that's mandated. So we're asking our staff now to document preventative incidents, right? But this is above and beyond. And we understand this is underreported. But we accounted for over 25,000 contacts day-to-day that go without any incident. We also recognize in 2025 there was over 5700 of those incidents that never resulted in any use or force and just we applaud our line staff for remaining professional and really adhering to the policies in place.

The monitors also agreed for that for the first time in ROSA's history. The department met the threshold for 2.6 which went from 82% 90% threshold, and once again we couldn't do that without a collective effort from our young command staff and supervisory staff along the lines that have totally bought into the culture change and remains committed to this effort.

And so we also wanted to recognize what causes. We continue to trend down on our personal weapons, including our head strikes and we want to do a deeper analysis and what we recognize that unfortunately in a lot of these times those head strikes occur after our staff has been assaulted And the monitors can also attest to that because we recognize it during our analysis, that sometimes individuals unfortunately without provocation will assault her staff in order to get a single cell. A lot of the time individuals are set in large dorms. We've gone above and beyond to do town halls to advise them you do not need to assault staff if you want a particular cell but they recognize that if they move out of that dorm the likelihood is for them to place in another like-sized dorm because of their classification or medical needs What have you.

Nonetheless, we also have to ensure that our staff have the right to defend themselves what we have also recognize though is that when they do use a head strike they quickly revert deescalate and resort to other means to further control the situation and once again just to highlight the amount of contact that our folks have In 2025, we accounted for over 50,000 individuals that were judicially remanded into our system that process through the base and facilities meaning the ME reception center and either twin towers or men's central jail. And this just really underscores the amount of contact our staff has on a regular basis yet we continue to trend down and improve in our compliance measures.

And so this is where we stand with the panel. We recognize once again that we're not always going to see eye-to-eye but we are definitely closing the gap tremendously. Of the 50 cases that the panel reviewed, 13 involved personal weapons and more importantly head strikes. Of that we only differed in three and even in those three we did find some similarities in concerns of what we did. So of the 50, 37 did not include any head strikes yet they were reviewed by the panel. Of the eight, the panel found issues with it and so did we. And we addressed it and corrective action was done.

The panel also found two of those non-compliant and we agreed and we initiated administrative investigations and imposed discipline. So it just goes to show you that on A, they were out of policy. We agreed to that. On the other two they found out a compliance and we too agreed on that and formal dissent on those. On the remaining three there was a gap and we recognize that there was an incident that was a tremendous result in someone sustaining some significant injuries and even on that case Two of the members, including a supervisor received discipline for that. That is a case as it's currently in litigation so I'm limited as what I can share but as that case moves forward we'll be happy to share that information with you and then once again this is just straight from the monitor's report that they do look at the most egregious problematic incidents and we continue to close that gap.

In 2016th report we differed in four incidents and then the most recent one we only differed in three And once again, the gap just highlighted by the panel. They see that it's narrowing and there's still work to be done and we acknowledge them and we're willing participants to continue our collegial relationship. Another area where continues to be highlighted is a number of grievances.

We recognize that there's a high level of concerns at sometimes our requests, that because there is internal inefficiencies in our systems we're still working in an archaic paperwork system which we hope to leverage moving forward with technology that has been instrumental for many agencies across the nations. We continue to trend down. And we are in the final negotiations for a phone contract that's going to include a tablet solution, which is going to be presented to you in the next two months for final approval that we hope to implement this solution come 2027. There's a lot of information that individuals in our care should have the right and should have the right to get readily available especially in a society that we are so accustomed for instant gratification with technology, yet we still have a very archaic system in place which we hope to streamline moving forward.

And this just gives you specific areas of where the grievances are focused on. We continue to see a reduction in overall but I'd be remiss not to say that some of our living conditions especially like at Men's Central Jail it's a facility that we all know. It's 65 years plus and its existence has lifted life expectancy And because of its near sheer design, it creates a lot of issues when it comes to services. Jails 65 years ago were never designed to be conducive to the services that the population today requires. There's no dedicated space for clinical space program area to address the levels not including mail. Mail is something that today with email you should be able to get Instant communication with loved ones that you don't have to rely with the US Postal Services, which I think we all agree has also lived as life expectancy.

And so we are going to continue to focus in these areas. We continue to make modifications to Men's Central Jail and other facilities under our care to improve living conditions. And so this is where we fall short and we recognize it, and we identify three areas where we're going to focus on moving forward. So we can continue our upward progression. We recognize there's inefficiencies in the timeline when these investigations are committed, and therefore that is why not only is CFIT playing a major role but we are going to leverage A database to keep all our command staff on track to ensure that they meet those deadlines. It's going to be able to triage things, fast-track the way we currently process those investigations but we're also going to remove procedures that are currently in place and maybe they served a purpose five ten years ago but because of technology and other implementations and services no longer warrant their existence.

Accuracy once again the body won't come here what's gonna be instrumental in making sure that the incidents are captured with greater detail And the fact that CFIT is responding now to every Category 2, we believe those cases not only are they going to be more robust but they're gonna be timely completed. And lastly it's the grievance. We found inefficiencies in Men's Central Jail unfortunately some of the forms which are paper triple kit carbon copies individuals will use them for other purposes that are not intended for such as Covering light fixtures to dim the lights, but we still have an obligation to make sure forms are restocked And so we're making sure there's changes in that but more importantly We're hoping that we can leverage technology and therefore individuals can get requests Whether they're medical that we don't have to triage that those requests can go directly to medical services And so here's the other thing we got to make sure I share with you is that their infrastructure creates challenges.

You know, I'm a true believer that we need to provide our staff with the necessary tools and resources to be successful. If we don't do that it's just a recipe for failure yet our folks continue to do great strides to meet those standards but we can't ignore the fact that the population today requires a whole lot more services than what they were ever intended to design. We have 24 increase In our medium observation housing since 2021, there's been a 35 for most acute high observation inmates. And then we have an increase of 77 individuals with some type of disability requiring mobility concerns of which if you don't know California Institute at these ADA requirements in 1992 yet none of our facilities were ever designed or built after the fact so now we find ourselves investing in infrastructures like CJ to make them ADA compliant, which I believe none of us want to continue to invest.

And CEJ being a linear design does not align with best practices for direct supervision nor out-of-cell time or program as indicated. And once again here's another fact that shouldn't be a place but it does exist is that on any given month we do over 2,000 movements to identify appropriate beds for individuals whether it's because of classification, decompensating or requiring a specific medical bed which is mandated by the several federal settlement agreements we have. Johnson for mobility concerns, Rutherford for conditions of confinement and making sure people are identifying proper houses and of course Rosas that coincides with the Department of Justice when it comes to those who suffer from mental health conditions. And this also doesn't take into account In the Basin facility, the over 300 unexpected medical runs that occur on a monthly basis.

yet do not tend to have an impact on our force measures that we do. And then coming to a conclusion, this is where we stand. We want to make sure we elevate the fact that we continue to improve in the last 10 years. Compliance has never been deeper as far as having of the remaining 67 provisions. We continue to be compliant and 40 of them for the last three years.

We have stronger accountability measures in the gap between what the panel finds us At a compliant is narrowing and we continue to see progression in compliance, yet we continue to acknowledge our shortfalls. We're not deviating from that were moving forward. We're finding solutions coming to you for the necessary financial support such as the body worn cameras and moving forward with a tablet solution. And then lastly but not least, we continue to see progression even though sustained compliance requires financial investment in infrastructure which continues to be shortfall and therefore that is why the sheriff will continue to advocate for a correctional care center to serve the population, meet higher compliance in our provisions. So with that this concludes my presentation and I'm available for comments.

2:22 – 2:3825 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:22:17

Very good, I have several members in the queue. We'll start with Catherine Barger.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:22:23

Thank you and thank you to the monitors for being here it's always nice to see you and thank you for that report. So the court ordered 19 provisions be moved to non-reporting status in this reporting period correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:22:39

That is correct, Supervisor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:22:40

And I think that's a positive accomplishment definitely moving in the right direction and I hope the department can sustain that but the last two slides concern me in terms of being able to sustain that when you look at the fact that you're talking about the rising acuity since 2021 and I'm looking at you doctor because I know you're treating many of those individuals And looking at the percentage that are disability, high observation housing, moderate observation housing. And then you talk about the physical plan which is not going to change at this point. That's a constant.

And then you look your last slide that says sustained compliance requires sustained support and acuity has arisen 24% to 77% since 2021 without matching staff or infrastructure in a workforce that experiences ongoing turnover So between the physical plant and the staffing issues, how do you see moving forward to sustain and to ensure that we are in compliance?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:23:54

In all honesty, it's a constant struggle. I mean that just highlights the commitment of our staff to really understand that there has been a culture change. They've embraced it and they understand the challenges. We're just not going to deviate from it but it's folks like myself and the Sheriff himself to advocate to provide them with the tools, to your point for them to be successful and to meet compliance.

So we're going to continue to commit to it. We're not going to say it's not going to be easy to continue that compliance but we've sustained it for multiple years and we're committed to continuing in that trend whether we fall short I have no doubt that we may experience some challenge where we fall short but it does not mean it deviates from our commitment.

So do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:24:36

any of the monitors want to comment on that like in terms of the physical State of where we're housing and attaining and keeping the compliance where it is today. I know we've talked to some of the monitors in the past about our concerns regarding the physical nature of the jail, but I don't know if any of you see that as something that's going to be problematic moving forward? And you don't have to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 37Proposed2:25:13

So, it has to do with the physical plant?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:25:16

Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 37Proposed2:25:17

Men's Central Jail is a challenge as we all know and there are doors that don't operate properly. The electrical system, the plumbing and I think I've said in the past that a lot of the uses of force that arise have to do with conditions of confinement And so the inefficiency of toilets and electrical and lighting are things beyond, I think certainly beyond the custody forces control.

And it may be worth, I think it is worth to make an investment in Men's Central Jail, to improve the physical plan as best you can. And I know the plans of the future are to tear the jail down. So I was working in a, an old facility, a jail and we were moving into a new facility. And there was a lot of discussion about why would you improve the old facility when it is going to be torn down or remodeled?

And I says, well in the kitchen we're going to make another million meals between now and then. And we need to improve it. And so we did. And it was money well spent because we saved on other areas certainly the interactions between the inmates and the staff and the quality of life for the inmates and the quality of the work environment for the officers. So as we were going up the elevator I commented somebody can you imagine being The person that's responsible for this elevator.

They do have some new elevators, but they have old elevators as well and It's a challenge, a real challenge because when you're trying to do patchwork. So anyhow that I don't know if that answers your question about the physical plant

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:27:26

but... That answered it and the sheriff when you all were giving your presentation you talked about the cultural change are you the monitors seeing that? I mean I know that you're looking at each case and I think you were there this morning Are you seeing a change in culture within our jail in terms of the personnel that you're meeting as it relates to training?

Absolutely.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 37Proposed2:27:50

It's, it's a big improvement. Give me an example we were visiting with some staff this morning both sergeants and line staff and there's always a hesitancy because you have this feeling when you're a deputy or an officer that you know I can handle this situation but recalcitrant Inmate policy is now to the point where deputies are very comfortable calling in sergeants to help them with situations. And the sergeants do not hesitate to go in and help with those interactions, and I think the figures you're seeing here is really the initiative of your line supervisors and your line deputies And you can tell it's a little more service-oriented, and less confrontive.

And of course some areas of jail where you have high risk inmates and so forth, it becomes more challenging but I can—and I've been here since the beginning—I can see a marked difference in the improvement.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:28:57

And I think that's important to note for this board. I mean I know that we've talked about it taken a while, but you are training and educating the workforce about not only what we need to do to be in compliance, but just overall treatment of those that are in our facilities. So I commend the sheriff and your entire team for that. So the monitors have asked the department identify head strikes as a separate category on the force tracker they use How are you going to get into compliance with that and how are you going to make that change?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:29:34

So we're fully committed with that, ma'am. As indicated, we created an eForce tracker which is a web-based design. And all we have to do is do coding to specifically extract that information. So there's no difference in the way we started tracking it in 2020 specific to head strikes, now will be specific to those that were personal weapons head strikes and then potentially head injuries that are not necessarily a head strike but they sustain a head injury so we're going to make sure we're intentional on how we capture information and so we've had that discussion yesterday. I had those meetings this morning and so we'll make ways to address those needs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:30:09

So can I ask, what is the thought process behind pulling that out and tracking that separately?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:30:14

We want to make sure that we are reviewing every head strike case that the department has. And right now, the tracker has on their personal weapons. And so while we request every personal weapon that should capture every head strike case, but we want to make sure that we are and we also want to verify that that data matches up with their other head strike data that they have.

pulling the actual case number and seeing how many they have in a quarter or so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:30:42

And we're fully committed to that, like I said it's just extracting data to a greater grade.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:30:49

And last but not least, I think you've answered this but I know that this is the 17th report and I personally have seen us come a long way and again want to thank the monitors for coming in with The ability to work with us and recognize it's not about a gotcha, it's about really addressing reforms that are needed to take place. And so each one of you have been instrumental in working toward that and working together, not an us versus them. It's about us working together. You all are Looking at what is taking place to make sure that we are complying, but you're coming at it with teamwork. And I just want to acknowledge that publicly and obviously you know just listening to what was said We are making that systemic change within the department and I'm hearing loud and clear we have work to do But it's work that is not because we refuse to do it, but we just have to change some of the way we operate, some of the training we do.

But we're all in this together. So I sense that you all believe that you are seeing that systemic change from within the department from when you came to the 17th report. Fair statement?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:32:12

Yes, there's been significant changes with a lot of things that they've implemented. What we hear from the inmates that we interview, they think cameras had one of the biggest changes or biggest impacts on force in the Sheriff's Department and now with the body-worn cameras coming online, they definitely see that as a positive change as well. We've just started reviewing cases That have body-worn camera footage, so we'll have a better sense of that probably during our next visit. But yeah in the collaborative nature cooperation that we receive from the Sheriff's Department is very helpful. It really is and their force reports haven't approved and as we've noted in several of our last reports, that gap is narrowing between what we find out of compliance and what they see is out of compliance.

And it is significant that in this report, they reached compliance with the head strike provision. I would note that we reviewed fewer head strike cases in this reporting period than we did in the prior reporting and prior reporting periods so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:33:18

That's a good note. You know when you talk about cameras, that's another example with Men's Central where we got off to a bumpy start because it's very hard to place cameras in certain locations in there and we saw that firsthand. So I think the body worn are going to be a game changer, not only for the people that we have in the jail but also for the people working in the jail. I think it's gonna be a win-win across the board and at what point are we in terms of rolling out? Are they all in place or is it still being rolled out?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:33:52

So to my earlier point Supervisor 70% of our entire division that means everything in Twin Towers everyone at Man Central Jail So now we're focusing on the PDC facilities, which are three. NCCF started last year and they're almost fully equipped. We began in May of this year with North facility so really all you have is South facility and hence why we hope to be fully deployed with body-worn cameras by the end of this year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:34:22

So you triage looking at where you felt the greatest need was

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:34:27

Absolutely. We recognize that we have a settlement agreement in the basin facility, so hence why we focus and double down in those areas. And so we're hopeful. But we have seen a great improvement but we also have done analysis and recognized that the design of the facilities unfortunately end up in bad results because it creates anxiety, frustration when archaic systems don't provide those services. So we're hopeful to create a facility that's conducive to the care that is needed for today's population.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:34:55

Very good. Well, thank you again. It's good seeing you especially when we've got good news. We still got work to do but I think I know we are moving in the right direction so thank you and thanks for your presentation. Thank You Madam Chair

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:35:09

Good. Janice Hahn, Supervisor Hahn.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:35:12

Thank you Madam Chair and yeah just to reiterate this board is very clear about our resolve to close Men's Central Jail but in the meantime We are also as committed to making sure that, you know, those that are incarcerated are treated with humanity and dignity. As well as making sure that our deputies have a safe working environment. And to that end, and again yes we're making some progress but there are certain cases in this report that I was very troubled by This report mentioned one, in my opinion very horrific use of force case. And in this case two deputies threw an incarcerated person who was in handcuffs into the metal frame of a plexiglass window for refusing to take their insulin.

This caused the incarcerated person to break their neck and become paralyzed. This person later died in rehabilitation facility. And what was really troubling was our Sheriff's Department found this use of force to be within departmental policy, while the monitors found it to be out of compliance. The panel also raised the concern that there were several inconsistencies between the reports that the deputies made in response to uses of force and the available video evidence.

In this same incident, a deputy reported that the incarcerated person had charged at him. And that is why the deputy proceeded to take down the individual by safely guiding him to the floor. The video evidence however showed the incarcerated individual standing up After refusing his insulin, walking towards his cell not charging the deputy and it also showed the deputy not safely guiding him to the floor but forcefully taking him down leading to these catastrophic injuries.

And to be in compliance with the force review provisions, supervisors must hold staff accountable for forced reports that do not accurately and honestly depict the incident as was reflected in this video. And in this incidence, the department's executive force review committee did not acknowledge any instance any issues with either inaccurate or dishonest statements in their report so.

Correct me if I'm wrong about anything that I just said and it's very concerning. And Assistant Sheriff Macias, I guess for me why would the department say that this level of force was within policy and the monitors found it out of policy?

2:38 – 2:5325 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:38:15

Right, so that's the case I alluded to earlier. Supervisor where two of the supervisors did receive formal discipline for this case. So there was a level accountability as I mentioned it's a case that's currently litigation some limited what I can share but there will be nuances during an incident where perhaps a tactic or procedure both within policy but there was other factors that were not One example could be that we define, and the monitors recognize that for us to capture a head strike is me intentionally wanting to strike an individual in the head. A subsequent head injury is not a head strike but we definitely capture it and it is investigated by our Internal Affairs Bureau which any case such as this would be investigated by them.

So once again, the number of incidents we're discussing is three We do not dismiss it, we take it serious. We too were equally concerned and that's why corrective action was taking place in this particular case.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:39:11

Have you changed your analysis that it was still within the department policy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:39:20

We reviewed and we've re-briefed, and there's concerns in regards to post force preventative force measures that could have potentially been taken into consideration. So we look at everything holistically but once again I'll be more than happy to share once this case has been adjudicated.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:39:37

Right, because again just looking at your presentation the category three the most serious level of force includes deliberately or recklessly causing a person's head to strike a hard object.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:39:51

And that's why we as a command staff requested that it be investigated at the highest level outside of our division by an impartial investigative entity

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:39:59

Right. I think and that's what's hard about the monitors versus the Sheriff's Department, right? When the monitors say that was not within compliance and yet the department stands firm that it was within department policy. That's what I find difficult but that's something I think going forward we will continue to work. Dr. Bellamage let me just ask you what is there's got to be a lot of reasons Inside the jail that a person decides for whatever reason they don't want their medication, right? I think this person did not want their insulin because according to what I Have read it was a different amount or a different number That was being administered to them and according to the video. They got up and left The table where the nurse was what's our protocol when an inmate for whatever reason chooses to not take their medication.

That must happen a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed2:41:02

lot, thank you for the question supervisor yes it happens quite frequently over 98% of our patients. have full choice, just like we do in the community not to take a medication and to refuse the medication. There's a small subset and it generally revolves around psychiatric court-ordered medications where I'm not talking about that group but for the vast majority of our patients they have every right to refuse a medication at any time And at that time the staff, the nursing staff will attempt to educate them.

If for example the patient were to walk away they'll record that we'll go back later our first step is always to educate just like in the community would be when I tell a doctor we don't want to take something they want to know why and we try to problem solve that with them. We also have a protocol for individuals who repeatedly refuse their medication, they show up on a report and they get a visit from a provider again to escalate that. What's the challenge with you taking your medication? And sometimes it's a negotiation of finding a new medication or changing a dosage, something like that.

So there is a set protocol as to how that works and medication refusals are quite common in the jail setting.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:42:21

Right. And again, we understand that you know there shouldn't be a hostile situation against a deputy right but is refusing your medication ever reason to be like disciplined?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed2:42:37

Is that a question for me, Supervisor? I would say no. That's a medical or mental health issue that would then be treated through your mental health treatment team or your medical treatment team and again just like in the community you wouldn't be punished for not taking medications by your physician. be engaged by your physician to explore why you're not doing it.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:43:01

Right, well I know this particular case is going to be further investigated but Dr. Bilovich, I would hope you would be at least a part of the education piece within the jail on what is the proper protocol when someone refuses their medication?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed2:43:25

Yes, we currently are and in fact the reason that custody officers are there to support our staff is it is a joint administration of medications. And so there is a lot of collaboration and education that goes on.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:43:40

Right. This was a terrible incident, it was horrible nobody feels good about it I know you don't either Sheriff Macias but troubled me a lot and then one final note I'm going to ask this to our County Council so you know besides the monitors and the sheriff's deputies COC, particularly as it relates to these ROSAS reports. There's been a request that the ACLU also get to participate more than their one minute public comment during this time. Is there challenges to having them for instance be on the panel or you know sit by side-by-side and give their perspective as well?

CommentRed Ribbon Week OctoberProposed · by introduction2:44:27

Thank you, Supervisor for the question and I'm aware of their request in the letter they submitted to your board. In fact as the ACLU notes in its letter the Rosas court-ordered settlement specifically in paragraph 1.4 as they cite incorporated into this settlement agreement requires the department to report regularly to the Board of Supervisors on use of force and the status of the department's compliance with the implementation plan. The purpose of this agenda item is to have the department report directly to your board on the status of its compliance.

In further of more transparency, your board requested that the monitors once selected by the ACLU, once selected by the county and then once selected by the court at the recommendation of the parties also present to the boards so that you can hear directly from them as opposed to just taking the department's word for it. Also, as the ACLU report notes, the monitor's 17th report indeed does contain some negative information As has been the case for many of their prior reports.

And the monitors are here, they can speak for themselves and they can highlight for your board areas where they disagree with the department or any concerning information that they wish to share with you and the public just as they have done in past presentations. On the other hand inviting the ACLU to present to the board blurs the distinction between public hearings and adversarial litigation as the ACLU is class counsel for the plaintiffs in the Rosas case However, the ACLU does meet with the Roses monitors and the ACLU provides feedback on the draft reports and communicates directly with the monitors about any issues or concerns that they have.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:46:02

Right. And I just wanted to highlight that, that they do present their opinions through letters and then sometimes they come for public comment. I just want to make sure we always... They may not sit on the panel but I want to make sure it's a part of our material that we get in front of us as we discuss each of these cases so thank you for that answer. Thank you Madam Chair.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:46:30

Thank you Supervisor Horvath.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:46:32

Thank you, Madam Chair. I want to thank our monitors for your hard work in evaluating our county's progress and I want to thank our Sheriff's Department for the presentation and for your work coming into compliance with the Rosas Agreement. It's clear that there has been reduction in overall uses of force and as we've heard already through some of the questions there's been marked progress in terms of shifting culture as well which I think is even more important to make sure we stay on a path of progress. So I want to start by acknowledging that, not because I think we're at mission accomplished yet but because I think we have to acknowledge when progress is made and I know that requires effort not only for the members of the Sheriff's Department who are committed to making those changes but all of the county departments that are inside our jail spaces to help care for people, and so I just want to thank you for all of the investment that's been made to make progress.

And there are still some concerns from outside organizations which we saw in the letter from the ACLU and I know that we've already highlighted some of the concerns and so i'm glad that has been covered. I just wanted to add on to a couple of topics if I might. The ACLU has expressed concerns that while the CFIT team and process have improved the timelines and timeliness of the early stage-of-force investigations, they have not improved overall timelines and timeliness of reviews for uses of force throughout the entire process. And have not significantly improved the large length of time between when an incident first occurs and any potential discipline that might be issued. So can you talk a little bit more about what the department is doing to address that timeliness question?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:48:26

Yeah, absolutely ma'am. I share that in one of the slides that we recognize we found efficiency in the first line level which is really critical to ensure that all the evidence is preserved and the reports are submitted timely But we're recognizing a bottleneck as we move forward, and hence why we established the electronic web-based platform which is instituted in October of 2025. Because I personally have a vested interest for them to evaluate us on current incidents and not on incidents that may be a year or two in the rear. And so to continue to recognize the good work that's being done, that's one of the features that's being done. We're also removing existing protocols that perhaps at one point they were warranted but no longer.

There's really no return on investment to have that lower review, and so we're having that expedited to the appropriate individuals. But more importantly is I want this web-based tracker to advise our staff which cases are being requested by the monitors to make sure that those cases are truly expedited and they receive current cases. So those are the two things that we're doing. We're removing existing services and protocols that no longer warrant their use. We've created the web-based platform to keep everyone in line and highlight the cases That are being requested, and therefore now the force team is responding to the actual category two use of force meaning before they would wait for the information to come to them. They're going now to every single case as a February of this year getting all the information make sure that if there.

Vague and ambiguous reports, they are addressed right there and then. If there's a need for video admonishment that is done right there and then. There are supervisors so they can pull that individual offline to complete the paperwork and we believe that's going to have tremendous improvement.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:50:11

And for our monitors, is that also your experience? That those shifts are happening. I think there's sort of been a through line with the Sheriff's Department that a lot of the cases that have been highlighted are from past eras and that the present moment is delivering different kinds of results. Would you agree?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:50:30

Well we can't quite say that because of how delayed the cases are in getting to us and so we spent quite a bit of time on the 17th report Highlighting the problem with the timeliness of the packages getting to us. It's not consistent with the compliance measures we have in place that says that they're to get packages to us as expeditiously as possible, so we can review them in a quarter and we are behind in our reviews because we're not getting them timely. I do believe there's a commitment for them to really look at their process and change that and to get them to us faster. We haven't seen those results yet but we will continue to report on this issue In future reports because it's very, very much a focus of ours. We want to make sure we're telling the court that we are what we want to give the court the most recent information that we can as well as the board.

We want to make sure that you understand we are reviewing cases that occurred within the past six months or so versus two years ago.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:51:30

And it sounds like they have a new system in place. Do you have any sort of eyes on that at this juncture? They

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:51:36

did share with us or showed us how that works, but we have not seen the results of that yet, of the impact of that on the timeliness getting to us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:51:44

Okay, but the way that they've set up the system you have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:51:47

a degree of confidence. Yes I do think it's going to be helpful that every layer of supervisor is able to go into the system and determine where the cases are. I think it gives them a better view of where those bottlenecks are so people can then hold staff accountable who are not meeting their policy timeframes within moving those cases forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:52:06

Okay, and I know that we touched on what I also agree was a pretty egregious case and sort of dug into that a little bit. But I also know that there are other cases where there was discrepancy between how the sheriffs saw something and how the monitors saw something. So I guess I would ask our monitors, if we chose incidents at random rather than focusing on the higher risk cases that I know for understandable reasons have been the focus. Do you think that we would have... Is your sense that there is more agreement between your perceptions on things? Or is it just that these cases happen to reflect more agreement Do you have a sense of that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:52:59

I think there is more agreement. I think through our meetings with both Plaintiffs' Council and the Sheriff's Department where we talk about how we came to our findings, and we watch the videos together and explain their views, why they see it a certain way, why we see it a certain way through that dialogue And through how they're writing up their analysis in their force reports, I think that has gotten us closer. I really do and the provisions don't require perfection right? It's a 90%.

So even at the time the compliance measures were written there was a recognition that there may be a discrepancy You know, there's going to be a certain number of cases that perhaps we don't agree on. And that's you know we did highlight in this case a couple of egregious ones but there are other cases that are not egregious where we don' t agree so...

2:53 – 3:0213 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:53:52

And I think it's helpful to have I mean that's why you're here and it's helpful to have that outside understanding for comparison and to help to continue to challenge notions around what may or may not be So I'm glad that we're continuing to highlight that so we can have understanding of what reasonable expectations are. I know that the ACLU letter highlighted that lower population at IRC could potentially be a reason there are fewer uses of force at that facility. Would you agree with that analysis?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:54:27

I think it's a very good point. We have not overlaid that data or our findings with population, but we are looking to do that in future reports to at least take a snapshot of population and see what impact that may have. But lower population It makes common sense that it would likely lead to less

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:54:45

force. That's how I see it, but you all are much more informed on what I might be missing. Would the Sheriff's Department agree with that as well?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:54:53

So there is a correlation as indicated in one of the slides where we saw a 60% reduction and we recognize the difference in population for those 3,000 would equate to 20%, but it's three times the reduction that we're seeing. So while there is a correlation, we are advancing more in our compliance and in reduction in overall use of force.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:55:12

And finally, I want to highlight we've been investing in certain aspects of accountability in the jails supporting the deployment of body-worn cameras for example. But it's no secret that the county like many levels of government are experiencing budgetary challenges and make clear our priorities. So, that's our job and I love context and information when I'm making those decisions so for our monitors do you have an opinion on where some of the better investments might be made going forward in terms of lowering the likelihood of problematic use as a force?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed2:56:00

This would be an investment that I don't think necessarily goes directly to force, but I think the tablets will have an impact on the grievance portions of the Rosas Settlement Agreement. One of the constant complaints we get from inmates is that they do not have access to the forms and if it's on the tablet you take that argument away And, you know, we hear and having worked in corrections, we recognize it's common that you have grievances in a box. As soon as you put them out there one or two inmates will grab most of them. Some of them hand them out. Some of them hoard them.

That's a constant battle with keeping the grievances in the box. So I think having it on the tablet would be what at least for the grievance portions is of the case would be helpful. A helpful investment for the county to consider.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:56:53

Okay. I see you want to jump in.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 37Proposed2:56:56

One of the things that has plagued corrections throughout the years is idleness. And to keep an inmate population busier, it's really hard to jail. Having worked in prisons and jails, it is much more challenging in jails to keep the inmates occupied because everything you give them, you know, to keep them occupied is something that can be used as contraband or a weapon and so forth.

to have some creative ways to keep the inmate population and make a huge difference in the interactions they have with the deputies. Okay, anything? Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:57:34

If I could just share more context on that. I've seen it nationwide. I visited many institutions that have a tablet solution and to Bob's point if they sit idle sometimes it's not good for them having access to readily available information not only does it provide them There's anxiety to understand where their case is at in the judicial process, but they should have the right to know how much money is on their books when their next visit is going to be. Not to mention all the services that could be rendered virtually after COVID. We all recognize that a virtual tablet solution you can expand services and programming where you don't necessarily need to be moved from your housing location. But we're still hopeful that we can get a facility that's conducive to that.

But in the meantime, a tablet would be very advantageous.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:58:18

Okay, that's helpful. Thank you Madam Chair.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:58:20

Thank you and I also want to just echo thank you for the report and the presentation it feels like there's progress and certainly this is you all have been at it for some time and just as I sit here 12 years And starting out with the discussion of getting body cameras, period. Making sure there were tablets, making sure that there was adequate safety plumbing and things of those nature I think go a long way. I really do. I'm not under the impression that we're going to somehow immediately be able to close Men's Central Jail In the next year or two, I've been sitting here having that discussion with so many people on this dais as well as the public. But I do believe that the way that we treat people in our custody is very important and I've heard enough complaints and I know there have been some changes in the facilities upgrades and I appreciate that But I do think that the overcrowding in Man Central Jail is still very unacceptable.

And I would hope that we can start to look at how we lessen the population. And it is reasonable to think, the less populated you have cells, facilities or areas where people congregate because that's where they're supposed to be for a couple of hours isn't always the best situation when you have too many inmates and not enough appropriate trained staff to help and to give them the kind of attention that they may require. And your report here shows it, the acuity levels of the inmates is not getting any better at all.

And I understand they are maybe staying with us longer but a higher degree of acuity in terms of physical well-being. So just to look at the disability, the fact that many of our inmates there are disabled tells me what the proportion, my question would be, what is the proportion of those individuals in Men's Central Jail? And why are we not alleviating that appropriately And maybe that's also the removal of that facility, moving them out to another facility. And I know we've had those discussions too, putting them up in the northern part of the county and is that helpful? Is there progress being made there?

I just want to ask the Sheriff, I want to ask Dr. Belovich as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:00:57

So Supervisor, great question and absolutely we take everything in consideration. Our population is transient it's not like a prison system where people stay in a cell and so we always are constantly working on the fluctuation of classification or individual needs but once again I can't emphasize enough how much a facility that's conducive to the population that exists today in order to meet compliance but to your point to provide a constitutional level of care with dignity and respect to them That right now, all of our facilities are challenged with that. Even if we move them to north as we are planning for a population it still requires the design of ADA access to meet those measures and so all you're doing is moving a population where the facility is not conducive to care.

It's not care centric in our existing platforms.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:01:44

And I think that's part of the discussion this board has had looking at how we continue to depopulate And also, and you have been able to do that. But also making sure that people get the appropriate level of care and I know that's been a constant battle Dr. Belovitch with respect to providing adequate treatment for and making the diagnosis so we don't end up seeing You know, this cycle that continues and the severity of illness with inmates that we have goes undetected or is not well treated at least from what I'm reading. And we have numerous deaths.

That's

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:02 – 3:1317 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed3:02:45

Providing our incarcerated population additional space, as we've all seen some of the living conditions. There are people living just on top of each other that's going to just promote the potential for violence not only You know, from staff to incarcerated individual but between individuals and inmate assaults specifically. So for example, individuals having more space can reduce just violence overall and make people feel like they're in a safer place.

We've talked a lot about the tablets, which are a big part of the solution. But another number that was up there earlier that I think is really important, especially from where I sit as the health care provider, is that 1,800 individuals who get moved every month. Those are individuals who—that would be similar to you changing your doctor every month. When those people move, they move from the basin to Pitchess. That's a whole new care team. They may get moved to Twin Towers—that's a different care team. And it may not be because of their changes in health status. It may not be because of their changes in their mental health.

a certain number of type of bed, and we have to take a population and move them to accommodate that bed. And so whenever we move a patient, we break their continuity of care. And I've talked about that a lot with the board over the years about the primary care model and following our patients, and I think that's a big part of this solution. The less we have to move our patients, the better care we can provide them.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:04:17

But staying in Men's Central Jail isn't the best

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed3:04:20

solution. No, I'm not advocating for that. Please do not say that I'm advocating for that. I'm with you there.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:04:28

Because I'm concerned that we've looked at different models especially for those with mental acuity and trying to change pods, creating pods for them and allowing them to have more space and have other inmates also who Go through training to help them decompress. I wonder why we can't fast forward that model? I know we made some progress, Sheriff, but can you talk about where we are with that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:05:01

So yes, ma'am. We are in full support of the program you're referring to, the FIPS step-down program. We have 17 modules at Twin Towers that currently do that and we have an additional five at CRDF but to your point when you're making those pods to be less populated you're displacing populations onto Men's Central Jail or PDC so it's once again it's a transient population that we have to balance the appropriate beds with service providers, and then you also have so many medical step-down advisors that work with the population is there. So it's a constant need for the entire division but to your point we would love to have a facility that's conducive to just that. That's treatment centric, that provides the opportunity with multiple variations of cell configurations to give better options to better serve the population and to the doctor's point to have continuity of care where we're not moving the population because they're all Concentrated in one area to be better served.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:05:56

Are we able to expand upon the program currently? Given, given you know the facility design right now in Twin Towers are we able to fast forward these pods?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:06:07

So right now we don't have enough participants to fulfill the existing 17 modules. But if we've had a robust entity of more patients entering the system, then of course we continuously evaluate it. So it's a program that we're proud of. We continue to advocate and ensure that its progress continues.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:06:27

I certainly want to see more progress made there. I think it is a very well-founded program, I know we were big supporters of it and want to see those efforts continue not just there but perhaps in the other facilities as well. I don't know if we've tested that out there in other facilities have we?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:06:46

So the concentration of services are in Twin Towers. That's where we have the most acute, hence why we've moved populations that are not as acute to Man Central Jail and then another 1,200 to our Pitches Attention Center specifically North Facility where we have 1,200 individuals there. And so they do have expanded services out there. We give them other services but for FIPS step-down specific is when you go from the most acute to more of a medium observation housing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed3:07:13

Just seems to me that, oh go ahead doctor. To echo what the assistant sheriff mentioned, yeah the individuals in those pods are housed in twin towers we wouldn't allow individuals at that level of care to be housed for example at pitches they would be transferred down but however it pitches I think it's also a very at North facility in particular it's a very successful program and partly because the dorms are large and we have purposely kept the population a bit smaller than it had been It had been previously when it was a general population, so that each individual just has a little bit more space up there and a little more breathing room. And so I think that makes a difference when we can do that.

We can't always do that just based on the numbers.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:07:59

And I too wanted to just reflect that I was also very alarmed to read the severe incident that occurred that is currently being litigated and to really Find out later, whatever what corrective action plan. and how discipline was carried out, and if there's necessity to have more. Obviously that's a factor that I think just kind of shatters a lot of the good news.

And that's really problematic. I do want to also bring up accountability because I think while there is good progress being made, I don't disagree with what my colleagues are saying about that. But I do believe that the force reviews Some of them take more than a year and discipline imposed on an average of 15 months after the department learns of an incident. So how do you explain that, Sheriff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:09:02

It's kind of like what I alluded to Supervisor Horvath's point as far as the infrastructure review and how we're pivoting and reorganizing Some of those other cases could be investigated by Internal Affairs Bureau so we don't have any direct impact on how fast those get investigated. Some of those cases do have up to a year in statute to be investigated and completed. And so while we advocate for those to be quicker, we are looking at what we can do internally. And so we hope that by having streamlined the supervisors complete those investigations and having access like myself to understand where the bottleneck is, where we can hold people accountable to ensure those investigation. That's what we're proposing to do. To the monitor's points they want to get recent cases and I too want them to receive Recent cases so they're evaluating us to the good work.

That's being done today for example I could tell you that although in 2025 we had 29 head strikes as of this morning We're hovering at 14, so we're still trending in a downward trend and with only a few months in this calendar year So we are going to double down on these efforts And and adhere to the sheriff's direction to hold people accountable while also recognizing the good work

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:10:13

And I just wanted to say that I understand that for grievances, only two of the more than 300 retaliation grievances have been investigated. Is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:10:27

So there is a delay in a lot of these grievances, but no I don't think that those numbers reflect what's currently being done. We do recognize that some grievances against staff could be either misclassified, but we do not shy away from the fact that we need to rebuild that process. The doctors point on the monitors, there's a lot of requests that unfortunately builds frustration because of the internal delays and inefficiencies that turn into grievances and then of course sometimes bad results. And so we're hopeful with your support that the tablet can be implemented sooner rather than later.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:11:02

And I guess one of my other questions is the department policy calls for watch commander review within 21 days Yet, my understanding is that reviews are taking up to 567 days with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:11:13

an average discipline. Just to close out, department policy calls for watch commander review within 21 days. Yet reviews are taking up to 567 days and discipline averages about 471 days. What specific timeline targets are we setting? And will your report provide us any progress in meeting those timelines in your next presentation? Sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:12:20

I do hope so, ma'am. Like I said we're changing our systems where we're leveraging on technology and once again those are not those I consider those more like anomalies because we're talking about the number of incidents that occur that require the same review by that watch commander but we were hopeful that we can Center and be intentional on the cases that are both most problematic and that they're not necessarily reviewed in chronological order But more in priority and hence why leveraging technology with a with the electronic tracker Along with supervisors responding to the location the day of the incident will expedite and streamline this system So we're not shying away. We're not saying that we have shortfalls in those areas, but we're committing to make improvement in all those sectors

3:13 – 3:165 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:13:07

I can't ask any more questions. No more questions from our colleagues, let's go to public comment and excuse me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:13:18

Will the following individuals please come forward and staff will assist you? Peter Eliasberg, Melissa Camacho. Madam Chair there are no remote speakers to address the board. We'll hear from in-person speakers Please begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 41Proposed3:13:47

After iceberg from the ACLU, I will have one minute to respond to about 15 different things I'd like to say about what's our Mr. Macias said County Council suggested that there are reasons not to have us present. There is absolutely no barrier to presenting it's not a public presentation. It's a public presentation about litigation and we are equal parties to the sheriff in that litigation And we should be able to respond, including the things they say on the stage. Two very quick points. Supervisor Hahn, there is no more further investigation. There's no discipline for the use of force where Mr. Fairchild was basically killed and there is no discipline for the lies that the deputies told that are clearly proven by what's on video. There's no further investigation coming.

Second of all, the Sheriff's Department doesn't treat throwing somebody into the wall and hitting their head as a head strike. So some of the issue about the gap is the fact that for multiple times now we've seen cases where the department throws people into a wall. But that's not a head strike.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 42Proposed3:14:52

Hello, Melissa Camacho with the ACLU of Southern California. To continue on Peter's point, the issue of the department not counting throwing somebody against a wall as a head strike is really opening this county and has opened this county up to liability. In the 15th report, the monitors identified an issue in which in Men's Central Jail where somebody was thrown against the wall and deputies lied about it. They were not disciplined. There was no zero tolerance for the dishonesty. As far as we're aware they stayed working on the force If they had come down hard on the deputies, acknowledged that as a head strike.

It's possible that the person who was killed in the 17th report would still be alive and yet instead we have happening again somebody handcuffed thrown against a wall a deputy lying about it and as far as we're aware Thank you. We will now go to our remote caller, Roy Humphries. Your line is open. Please begin.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed3:16:01

Yes, the four Democrats including Sheila Kuhl canceled a $1.4 billion New Men's Jail. California is the tech center of the universe yet we still do not have integrated state-of-the-art computer systems within the county's resources as the four Democrats spend hundreds of millions of dollars on five illegal aliens. Three, get the sheriff out of jail. Thank you.

3:16 – 3:2318 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:16:31

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board. That concludes public comment on this item.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:16:38

Madam Chair, this report will be received in file.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:16:42

Yeah, one thing. Assistant Sheriff Macias, can you just clarify because it was my understanding because of what you said that there was going to be some further investigation into this case that I was referring to and yet the speaker said there is no more investigation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:17:00

So it's going through the litigation and so that requires a review of the incident. But just to clarify, Peter Lyceberg there was discipline imposed in that particular incident so what he indicated is inaccurate when it comes to that.

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:17:14

So you're just, you're saying because of the litigation there will be more internal investigation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:17:21

I mean if there's new evidence that comes to light but it's being litigated and exposed but that in the case was investigated internally hence why I said there may be difference in opinions and certain other factors but the case went through the review process and we did hold people accountable for that particular incident. We too had concerns on how that incident played out

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:17:42

OK, well I misunderstood because I thought based on everything that I suggested that you actually were investigating it further. But that sounds like it's not the case.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:17:56

Okay, if there are no

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:17:57

further questions from the board this is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:17:59

a

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:18:00

receiving file and if there's no objections that will be the order. Thank you again to the panel and I apologize. Allergies.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:18:11

Executive Office?

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:18:12

Madam Chair, Supervisors Barger and Horvath have motions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:18:16

Okay

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:18:17

we'll go in that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:18:17

order. Supervisor Barger?

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:18:20

These motions were not on the posted agenda either to be presented or referred to staff and placed on future agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:18:29

Thank you, Madam Chair. I have a motion that's going to be for the 20th. The motion that I'm bringing forward and I think Supervisor Horvath if you want to co-author it with me today is to provide support to those residents in my district who have been impacted by the wildfires of January 7th. It has been more than 20 months since the Eaton and Palisades fire. For those of us who do not live there It can be easy to think of this as a recovery that is well underway. And in some ways it is, but debris has been cleared. Permits are moving. Homes are being built. But for thousands of households, recovery is still a daily fight with paperwork, with insurance companies, with deadlines and with the sheer complexity of navigating the system we have built to help them.

And for so many of these families, the single most valuable resource they have is not a check. It's a disaster case manager. A disaster case manager is one trusted point of contact who knows your file, knows your history and walks you through an insurance dispute, a FEMA appeal, a rental assistance application, a rebuild loan, a benefits enrollment for a survivor who has lost their home, their records and in many cases their job and their routine that a person is a difference between navigating this system and giving up on it.

That resource is now at risk. In early September, the state notified the providers of the federally funded disaster case management program that the program would have to be terminated on September 30th because the federal funding was not there. California requested 26 million to run this program. FEMA approved 13 million and has disbursed only about 3 million. The state has since extended the deadline to October 31st. At the end of September, FEMA announced a partial payment and signaled that it would approve additional funding. I want to be clear that is good news and I'm grateful for it but headlines and announcements are not enough.

Until those dollars reach the state or an interim mechanism is identified this program could end more than 14 months before its planned close date of January 8th, 2028. And more than 100 case management and support positions across five organizations will remain at risk. I do not feel comfortable sitting and waiting to find out. I do not feel comfortable with the fact that we still don't have definitive answers on this. If case management disappears in the middle of all that, people will miss deadlines that they do not know that they had.

They will exhaust temporary housing assistance without a plan. And some of them will become homeless, which is both a human failure and a cost this county will absorb one way or another. The Eaton Fire Collaborative and the Long-Term Recovery Group are already planning for that possibility. They have worked to build a transfer pathway so that no household is simply dropped.

Survivors are notified they consent And there is a warm handoff between the agencies. Even after that triage, they estimate 400 to 500 households will still need an actual case manager assigned to them. So the motion that we will be bringing in October 20th will ask the county report back and be ready. It directs its CEO working with HSH, DCBA, LACDA, OEM, DPSS, 211LA, and La Casa And our recovery partners report back on how the county will support and can support continuity of case management. If there is a service interruption including who is at risk, what bridge funding exists? Who serves as the central point of contact for survivors so they are not left guessing and what it would take for community providers to absorb these cases. It also asked DCBA and La Casa and the CEO to evaluate whether a portion of the $2 million previously provided for DCBA legal services can be reprioritized to support bridge programming, and tell us the service impacts of doing that.

Furthermore, I'm asking for a feasibility assessment of repurposing $1.5 million in UARPHP funds for disaster case management and I'd like to ask LACASA to consider matching that amount on the emergency basis. And it directs the CEO of Legislative Affairs to prepare a five signature letter to FEMA and the Administrator and the Governor urging the timely release of the approved funds.

Our constituents In Altadena and on the west side in the Palisades and unincorporated areas have been resilient. But what I believe they need from this board is the assurance that if Washington is slow, Los Angeles County will at least look at a way to be there for their support. So I respectfully on the 20th will ask for your support as we bring this motion forward. Thank you

3:23 – 3:313 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:23:58

And I just wanted to add, I fully agree with everything that you've outlined. I know that your office has also been in contact but I recently spoke with the FEMA administrator directly about this issue and the need for that kind of investment and I want to be clear that it is federal funding that is supposed to be provided to support this case management work And yet in the absence of that support, this motion allows us to step in and do what is the right thing to do. And make sure that people are not left behind either who have been impacted by the Eaton fires or by the Palisades fire. I know that each community faces different and unique challenges so I don't necessarily want to see same treatment for different sets of circumstances. I just want to make sure that all who are impacted and our unincorporated communities by the fires are included in this.

Thank you. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:24:53

Supervisor Horvath, you also have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:24:55

Yes, thank you Madam Chair and thank you for joining me in this motion. As you all know October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month and nationally more than one in three women experience sexual violence physical violence and or stalking by an intimate partner during their lifetime about 16 million women said that they had first experienced intimate partner violence before the age of 18 In Los Angeles County in 2024 and 2025, at least 63 women were killed by someone suspected to be a current or former partner, family member or partner of the family member according to an LA Times analysis of medical examiner data.

These deaths accounted for over 40% of the 156 women killed during that time. A recent story from the LA Times spoke to the process of domestic violence restraining orders And the work done and not being done across the county to support survivors in need of this critical support. In 2025, LA County Courts received almost 15,000 petitions for domestic violence restraining orders and dismissed almost 60% of them due to procedural delays from the survivor making the request. This is nearly double the statewide dismissal rate.

We know that domestic violence restraining orders protect survivors, and I believe the board must take every step possible to better support and protect our survivors physically, emotionally, and mentally. The county must step up and lead in this space. There's a real sense of outrage, of anguish, and of urgency. And that's why I'm reading in the following motion directives, which will be before cluster on October 28th and this board at our November 10th meeting based on our current schedule.

And the directives are as follows. We therefore move that the Board of Supervisors direct the Chief Executive Officer to begin the process to add gender-based violence and intimate partner violence as a board directed priority using the definition of gender based violence previously approved by this board. The CEO should submit a 15 day written report back with suggested language around the board directed priority for board review.

Report back in writing as a part of the fiscal year 27-28 recommended budget with sources of ongoing funding and the amount of 5.1 million dollars annually beginning in the fiscal year 27- 28 budget to fully fund the Department of Consumer and Business Affairs self help legal access centers this ongoing funding will allow the centers to provide additional legal assistance for those in need of applying for restraining orders and other legal services Submit a 30-day written report back on all county investments related to gender based violence and domestic violence and intimate partner violence. This should include federal, state and local dollars. This report back should include a comparison with the investments of the City of Los Angeles including investments in the housing space.

Request the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department provide a verbal presentation to the board no later than November 24th, 2026 on their current efforts, staffing and protocol related to serving domestic violence restraining orders and temporary restraining orders. This presentation should also discuss plans to improve service outcomes and any additional resources needed.

DCBA, in partnership with the Department of Public Social Services and Department of Mental Health to explore how to integrate additional social service supports within DCBA's Self-Help Legal Access Center. A written progress report including any challenges and or required resources should be submitted to the board in 60 days. The Office of Violence Prevention, housed within the Department of Public Health to report back in 30 days in writing with an update on the county's existing gender-based violence efforts and how they're supporting intimate partner violence and domestic violence work throughout the county. This report should explore how current efforts could be improved challenges capacity and resource needs and opportunities for expansion.

Report back in writing in 60 days on recommendations for implementing a peer navigator model to support domestic violence survivors. This report should include a discussion of any funding or capacity needs to launch the program along with an implementation plan and timeline. The report and recommendations should be informed by those with lived experience and domestic violence service providers, along with additional key stakeholders.

Execute and administer a sole source contract with the Downtown Women's Center and execute further amendments as needed upon review and approval by County Council. For the provision of consulting services for the implementation of the DV shelter referral component of the countywide community information exchange formally formerly care connect and in an amount not to exceed $462,300.

The CIE platform will facilitate and improve access to domestic violence shelter referrals for survivors and their families. We further move that the Board of Supervisors direct all applicable county departments to work with OVP, and with the support from the Internal Services Department, to ensure that DVRO informational flyers and posters are printed and posted in all county facilities, particularly in women's or gender-neutral restrooms and contracted agency bathrooms to increase access to information.

OVP should report back to the board in writing in 60 days on a plan and if additional funding and resources are needed. The Department of Homeless Services and Housing, in partnership with OVP and other relevant partners, to report back to the board in writing in 60 days with an assessment of the funding and number of emergency beds available for people and their children or family members fleeing IPV.

The funding, beds, and subsidies available for stable housing and the gap between these existing resources and the need. This report should also include feedback on how this population can be prioritized for existing homeless service response services, and housing resources, and provide a budget illustrating funding and resources necessary for the county to be able to provide immediate access to emergency housing for any person seeking to flee gender-based violence using motel funds, existing site-based shelter or other solutions. This is something we have highlighted as a board. I know that we've highlighted as a board in other leadership tables including at LAHSA and LACASA. And I thank you Madam Chair for your support in this. We want this work to happen quickly but as you can see with the comprehensive nature of it some of it will take some time.

So I want to make sure that we're all prepared for it when it comes and that all of our departments know what the charges set forward. Thank you.

3:31 – 3:3912 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:31:56

Thank you, thank you for adding me as a co-author it's very comprehensive and You're outlining some very important issues that we've all been working on and I appreciate that so with that executive office

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:32:09

We will now move on to general public comment At this time we will hear from members of the public wishing to address the board on general public comments This is an opportunity for the public to address the board on subject matters within the Board's jurisdiction, but not on items on the meeting agenda. For members of the public already on the phone, if you have signed up to speak for this item, you do not need to do anything further.

If you are on the phone, have not signed up to speak or would like to comment on this item, please press star now and follow the prompts to be placed into the speaking queue. If you're watching the meeting and would like to address the board on this item Please call 213-444-2600, press star and follow the prompts. An operator will be on the phone to assist.

Please be prepared to address the board on subject matters within the board's jurisdiction.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:33:05

Will the following individuals please come forward and staff will assist you. Sylvie Andrews, Alicia Woods, Linda Scaletta, Donald Hooker, Maria Lace Peterson, Lizette Rooney, Matthew Parham, Sophia Vidal, Sonia Pearl. We will now go to remote speakers. Roy Humphreys your line is open please begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed3:33:33

Yes, Roland Heights. David Martinez states that Hitler Solis promised to get the Roland Heights fairway monument sign repair has not been reported as done. A letter to the LA County Sheriff on his criminal negligence in clearing Duke from the Nogales Colima median where a death occurred this month will be copied to Supervisor Solis as the taxpayer will be paying the judgments for the wrongful death and dismemberment.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:34:05

Thank you. Yadi, your line is open please begin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed3:34:11

Hi this weekend is NASA JPL Open House and where a defluxed Pasadena and Altadena rally was also to take place however it was cancelled due to the mysterious demise of lock cameras at Windsor and Ventura near the Gablernino Trail and JPL entrance as in they were cut down Tens of thousands of visitors from across the country attend JPL and their movements would have been tracked by ALPR. Even so, other ALPRs are still tracking the movements of thousands of JPL employees. Joshua Michaels' JPL National Security Exposure Assessment details the risk to JPL employees and visitors tracked by cameras like FLOC. I thank the board for last year's attempt to regulate LASD's ALPR but the best regulation is a ban on FLOCs and other government surveillance.

The LASD refuses ALPR transparency or compliance, and it is despicable. Flock co-opted LA fire victims and placed them under surveillance without knowledge or consent. The people are clear no to flock, no to mass surveillance, and surveillance is not safety. Please remove ALPR.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:35:13

Thank you we will now go to in person speakers please begin

PresenterSylvie AndrewsAltadena for accountabilityProposedself-stated3:35:17

My name is Sylvie Andrews, Supervisor Barger. Thank you for your continued advocacy for the Disaster Case Management Program. We appreciate your willingness to extend the review period for the FSRA report that was discussed earlier on the Eaton fire. We ask that you also address our request that the Altadena community be engaged during the review and the report back.

We also want the findings of the report back to be made public to the Altadena community. Our community deserves to know what you have to say about these FSRI findings and what you are going to do about them. A lot went wrong during this fire. Many of the recommendations in this report involve better engagement with the community and fixing what went wrong. We need you to start that now.

For example, county fire and sheriff did not manage the incident effectively together. This caused a major gap in communication and a lag in response between the two agencies fix it. Thank you next speaker.

PresenterAlicia WoodsSanta Clarita Valley School Food Services AgencyProposedself-stated3:36:22

Good afternoon, my name is Alicia Woods and I am the CEO of the Santa Clarita Valley School Food Services Agency. A joint powers authority serving four public school districts within Supervisorial District 5. I'm speaking under general public comment regarding the proposed environmental health fee increases that are expected to come before you in November. Under the proposed schedule, my agency's annual fees would increase from approximately $15,000 to $35,000 annually which would be a 288% increase into an already adopted budget.

I understand that the expense of administering and enforcing the Retail Food Code must be recovered. My concern is the size and immediacy of the increase and its impact on the students and families we serve. I respectfully ask the board to consider whether all allocated costs appropriately belong in the fee structure or could be continued to be absorbed by the County General Fund and consider alternatives that would not impact our children such as phasing in the increases. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:37:21

Thank You next speaker

PresenterLinda Scaletta I'mGlendale Unified School District Nutrition Services And I am here today to advocProposedself-stated3:37:24

Good afternoon Board of Supervisors, my name is Linda Scaletta I'm the Assistant Director of Glendale Unified School District Nutrition Services And I am here today to advocate for students with my fellow school nutrition colleagues The LA Department of Public Health is planning to implement public health permits for school cafeterias that will reach you for a vote on November 10th. The proposed permits is projected to increase costs for cafeterias across the county 200-500%.

For Glendale, it's over 325%, and this is without the guarantee of the two health inspections required by the USDA annually. For perspective, this equates to the funds for 5800 student launches diverted from their trays to county fees. We ask that the vote is postponed so that we can collaborate on a path of fee increases that makes sense for school districts one that is gradual and fee-for-service based and request the Board of Supervisors to identify funding to help keep cost manageable for school cafeterias. Thank you next speaker.

CommentMary Alice Pedersen TotalProposedself-stated3:38:29

I'm Mary Alice Pedersen, Eaton Fire survivor. In addition to...I'm still burning for justice. In addition to requesting that Chief Anthony Maroney be fired for negligence in the Eaton fire, I'd also really object to finding number 74 in the FSRI report which states that LA County Fire Department was under-resourced and understaffed. In fact, this is a department with a 2 to 4 billion with a B budget. I think the public has a right to know how they're spending that money right now and to see why the only thing we see in Altadena are three fire trucks at the burger shop or at the gym We do not see L.A. County Fire Department staff providing any advanced planning, any education to residents, anything proactive. I urge the board to initiate an anonymous survey of the firefighters, the frontline firefighters who are out in the field and I want to train and equip our newly forming Altadena Citizen Fire Brigade.

The only people who saved houses in Eaton Fire were citizens with hoses. Thank you.

3:39 – 3:436 turns

CommentSofia VidalProposedself-stated3:39:33

Thank you for your time. My name is Sophia Armendariz and I'm an Eden Fire survivor trying to rebuild. My general comment is a building and safety issue regarding compromised retaining walls adjacent to ADUs. After eight months, I finally received approval to start construction only to learn that my neighbor started to build an ADU four feet away from the property line on a compromised retaining wall that is 10-12 feet high. He erroneously received approval to build such because his design team failed to indicate that it was a retaining wall. Retaining walls and ADUs are becoming an everyday issue in Altadena, and require more detailed attention from building and safety prior to issuing approval. Most scenarios are resulting in litigation, which is an obstacle in completing construction.

Altadena is a foothill community with disparate height elevations and ADUs and retaining walls are becoming the serious issue that can result in property damage and safety issues. Thank you next speaker

PresenterMatthew ParhamInternational Humanitarian FoundationProposedself-stated3:40:37

My name is Matthew Parham. I'm the CEO of International Humanitarian Foundation. We've been pursuing the Hawthorne Mall, which is in L.A. County for almost a year. It's owned by Mark Chabais. We're well-financed, hundreds of millions of dollars. We're going to turn that into the largest food bank, medical, dental. Bad women and children would have their own floor and everything in between.

In the end term, no disrespect to Mayor Vargas They have continued to dance around, now they have a order to tear down the mall. So what I would ask of the county is to file a temporary restraining order to stop that or else give me a piece of property with buildings and I'll be more than happy to develop this whole thing wherever you tell me to put it. I can afford it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:41:39

Thank you. Next speaker, please.

PresenterSonia PearlFood Services at LA Unified School DistrictProposedself-stated3:41:41

Good afternoon. My name is Sonia Pearl. I'm the Deputy Director of Food Services at LA Unified School District. I am here with my colleagues, directors from other school districts. I am here to apprise our Board of Supervisors for a vote that will be coming your way next month by the Department of Public Health Division of Environmental Health. Currently, schools are charged $197 per inspection. We were recently notified that the fees have not increased since 2018 and the costs for inspection have increased so there'll be a change in the fee structure.

Public Health has proposed a permit fee of $870 per school site. LA Unified has 688 school sites so that amounts to over $600,000 in permit fees. A 340% increase. We have no way to increase our revenue to pay for any of the additional fees and at a time when we're all looking at extremely tight budgets... Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:42:44

next speaker?

CommentDonald C. Note HookerProposedself-stated3:42:45

My name is Donald C. Note Hooker I've just been released from prison 45 days ago after doing 30 years for a crime I didn't commit Speaker, Supervisor Mitchell, Solis and Barger all came to see me behind the wall as a performing artist. Ms. Barger was turned away unfortunately. I'm here today because last week I went to the Los Angeles Small Business Expo in Pasadena, California and I wrote a LinkedIn article called No Cash, No Email, No Food The Line Crossed at the Los Angeles Small Business Expo What it was, I had a $10 bill. Got up to there that says cashless.

Seen an elderly man having trouble. I said what's going on? He said he's having trouble with his email. I say if I don't give you my email, I can't have any food. They say yes and I thought that we should ban food and beverages. You should not have to give over your email to receive services in those scenarios.

3:43 – 3:505 turns

CommentLisette RooneyProposedself-stated3:43:47

Thank you. Next speaker. Madam Chair and members of the Board of Supervisors, my name is Lisette Rooney. I serve in the second district as a Child Nutrition Director for Lawndale Elementary School District. As you've heard, the Department of Public Health's Environmental Services Division will be proposing fee increases to public school cafeterias. The proposed changes really do have the potential to impact our ability to both feed and educate our students throughout the county.

The proposed changes in my district, in particular, amount to a 300% increase to our annual operating budget for child nutrition. I respectfully ask the board to review the impact of the proposed fees on public school districts and allow sufficient time for stakeholder input. I also ask that you consider potential funding sources to offset these costs to public schools while supporting the valuable services that environmental health provides to our child nutrition programs.

Thank you for your time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed3:44:48

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board. That concludes our time for general public comment.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction3:44:55

Madam Chair we will now proceed with adjournments.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:44:57

Okay we'll proceed with the following. We're starting with the fourth fifth first and the third. Supervisor Hahn?

ElectedJanice HahnSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:45:07

Thank you Madam Chair and when we adjourn today I move that we adjourn in the memory of Kathy Owens who passed away, she was 78 in Torrance. Kathy is the wife of our retired Assistant County Counsel Andy Owens And she's the sister-in-law of retired Assistant County Counsel, Jimmy Owens. And Jimmy is my current Assessment Appeals Board appointee and his wife Barbara Gould is a retired Principal County Counsel. So the Owens family has been embedded in our county counsel office for a long time. Kathy was born in England in 1948 and she lived in Long Beach for the past 25 years. Kathy taught dance, English, English as a second language in Manhattan Beach, Bolsa Grande High School and Cal State University Long Beach. Kathy was a longtime crew member of the Los Angeles Pink Dragons, in case you're wondering.

Based in Long Beach, the Pink Dragons are California's first dragon boat racing team made up entirely of breast cancer survivors. They've competed in numerous competitions across the state, country and internationally and they regularly participate in the Long Beach Dragon Boat Festival. Kathy lived her life with grace and kindness. She will be deeply missed. She is survived by her husband of 55 years, Andy, her children Claire and Drew, and her seven grandchildren. Our thoughts and prayers are with the entire Owens family. Yes.

Supervisor Barger would like to be included. I also move that when we adjourn today, we adjourn in the memory of Jerry Gaines. Jerry was my friend. He was my neighbor. He's a former county commissioner. Jerry graduated from Cal State Long Beach in 1965 with a bachelor's degree in business education and went on to earn master's degrees in secondary education in 1969.

Jerry served in the U.S. Navy and then worked as a high school teacher with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District, and during his time in education he was recognized as the Los Angeles County Teacher of the Year and received the US Congress Award for serving as chair of the Military Reuse Committee. Jerry also served on the L.A. City Charter Reform Commission, the L. A. City Redistricting Commission and the L.a. City Harbor Planning Commission.

Jerry dedicated over two decades to serving the residents of L. a County by serving on several different commissions. Jerry was appointed by Supervisor Kanavi to the Workforce Investment Board in 2002 And during his time, Jerry traveled nationally to Washington DC and Sacramento on more than a dozen occasions to advocate for our county. His efforts and leadership contributed significantly to the passing of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act in 2014.

In October 2015, Jerry was appointed to the L.A. County Commission for Older Adults by Supervisor Canabi and after I was elected as supervisor, I reappointed Jerry to this commission because I recognized his dedication and expertise. He served as the commission's legislative advocacy chair and as the secretary. And Treasurer, demonstrating his unwavering commitment to advocating for our older adult community.

Jerry and the other commissioners on the Older Adult Commission were integral in championing the creation of standalone aging and disabilities department Jerry was preceded in death by his son Paul, and he has survived by his beloved wife Lorraine and his son Mark and his grandchildren. I just have to say Jerry Gaines you know if you looked up the term civic engagement, Jerry Gaines would be Who you would look to, to epitomize what that meant. Whether it was the City of Los Angeles or the County of Los Angeles, Jerry just calmly, quietly and with great dignity and diplomacy served on so many commissions and brought people together, brought neighborhoods together and had such sage advice in his dealings, in all these commissions. It's hard to believe our world will survive without Jerry.

He just did so many amazing things and Lorraine was always there every step of the way to support him. We will miss you Jerry Gaines so much thanks for all you did.

3:50 – 4:073 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:50:05

Thank you. I move that we adjourn today, we do so in memory of Charles Freeman Allen a longtime resident of Claremont who passed away September 6th at the age of 98. Charles affectionately known as Freeman was born in Berkeley California 1928 and grew up in the Bay Area he graduated with honors from UC Berkeley with a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry and later earned his PhD in Organic Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin Charles met his wife, Elizabeth, when he returned to UC Berkeley to teach and the couple married in 1950.

They lived for many years in Claremont after Charles accepted a professorship at Pomona College where he went on to serve as a professor until his retirement in 1998. He was a dedicated environmental advocate whose decade-long Sierra Club leadership complemented his extensive contributions to regional air quality initiatives through the through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In retirement Charles became a driving force in local sustainability initiatives shaping Claremont's environmental policies programs and community partnerships.

Charles is preceded in death by his wife Elizabeth and survived by his daughters Debbie Logan and Mary Allen Son John Allen, three grandchildren and four great-grandchildren. Also that we adjourn in memory of Tevon Aristemian a former county employee and longtime Glendale resident who passed away on September 18th. He was born in Ukraine and immigrated to the United States in the 1970s where he became deeply involved in his community. He served as a commissioner for the state of California and worked as an assistant to the Los Angeles County Sheriff Until his retirement in 2014, Tevon was highly respected across the Armenian-American and Iranian-American communities. He was preceded in death by his beloved wife Clarice. He survived by his son Ana and his daughter-in-law Aida.

His granddaughter Camille and her husband Dr. Leo Kosian. Tevon will be dearly missed. Also that we adjourn a memory of Fred Clare Former General Manager of the Los Angeles Dodgers who passed away on Monday, on his 91st birthday. Claire spent 30 seasons with the Dodgers rising from the publicity department to general manager and in his first year as general manager, Claire helped build the roster that would propel the Dodgers to a thriving victory in the 1988 World Series.

He was instrumental in creating the branding that came to be known as Dodger Blue. And during his 11-year tenure as general manager, the Dodgers won a World Series, two division titles, a wild card berth and first place finish in the short or strike shortened 1994 season. He later served the city of Pasadena through the Rose Bowl Operating Company Board and various youth sports programs bringing his professional sports experience to the local community.

This included the first T program, which uses golf to teach young people life skills. His local work extended to education. After leaving the Dodgers he taught at Caltech and the University of Southern California and shared Scoutable's Sports Analytics Company. After a 2015 cancer diagnosis led to extensive treatment, Claire along with his wife Cheryl became a dedicated advocate for cancer research at the City of Hope.

Together they contributed to fundraising and awareness efforts including golf events benefiting head and neck cancer programs and also established a research scholarship funded with USC Keck School of Medicine. Claire is survived by his wife Cheryl And their three children, Jen, Jeff and Kim. I move that we adjourn today in memory of Harvey Sandy Crosthwaite Jr., a former sergeant who passed away on Monday September 28 at the age of 61.

Sergeant Crosthwaite Joined the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department in February of 1988. He honorably served the department and the residents of Los Angeles County for 34 years, I had the honor of meeting him when he worked at the Altadena Sheriff Station. He was larger than life, funny, trusted and a bright light to those around him. He made a huge impact and touched countless lives during his time with the department.

He was a dedicated employee and was deeply committed to public safety and serving his community. He made a lasting impression on all those who were lucky enough to work or to know him. Sergeant Crothway will be deeply missed, and I know definitely by his wife and his son but I've seen countless colleagues that have weighed in and are just devastated by his death.

He is survived by his loving wife, Orlinda Gallegos who also works for the county crossway and his beloved son Jason. May he rest in peace. I move that when we adjourn today, we also adjourn in memory of Tony Newhall a longtime Santa Clarita Valley community leader, newspaper publisher, dedicated volunteer and resident who passed away at the age of 86. Tony came from a family deep-rooted in the history of the Santa Creta Valley. His great, great grandfather Henry Mayo Newhall was a namesake of the community of Newhall and Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital. He continued his family legacy of service through both journalism and decades of community involvement. He grew up in Berkeley and attended Stanford University. After serving in the Peace Corps of Peru, Tony joined his family newspaper The Signal in 1968 He worked his way from circulation manager to general manager in 1977, became publisher succeeding his father Scott Newhall.

After leaving the Signal in 1988 Tony spent approximately 10 years as associate publisher of the San Francisco Chronicle before eventually returning to the Santa Clarita Valley. His contributions extended well beyond journalism. He was deeply involved with the Newhall Boys Club Now the Santa Clarita Valley Boys and Girls Club, where he helped establish an organization's auction, led fundraising efforts, served as board president, and was twice recognized as director of the year.

He also gave his time and leadership to the Henry Mayo New Hall Foundation, United Way, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, and founding board of Friends of Hart Park. In recognition of his extraordinary commitment to the community, Tony was named Santa Clarita Man of the Year in 1985. Those who knew Tony remembered his intelligence, positive outlook, contagious smile and genuine ability to connect with others.

He also had a lifelong love of racing and interests that led him to meet his wife Renia at her dance studio. The two shared nearly 50 years of marriage He leaves behind a remarkable legacy in journalism, philanthropy and community service. His contributions helped shape the Santa Clarita Valley and his impact will be remembered for generations. He's survived by his wife Rina, four children and seven grandchildren. And last I move that the Board of Supervisors adjourn In memory of the following individuals who are identified as indigent veterans by the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner and were subsequently buried with dignity and honor at the Riverside National Cemetery in the last month.

Ruben Armando Medina, Marines Stephen Carey Dravo Navy Richard Paul Buckman Marines James Richard Fournier Army James Richard Miller Marines, Dusty James Gardner Army, Marco Craver Navy, Leslie Allen King Navy, Orlando Christopher Peoples Navy, Arthur Bernard Trotter Army, Victor Rolando Lopez Army, Clifton DeWayne Minor Marines, William Stephen Pryor Air Force, Douglas Martin Dowell Jr. Navy and David Marlon Birdwell Army May their contributions and sacrifices in service to our country never be forgotten.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:59:14

Members, thank you. Thank you. Today members I move that when we adjourn we do so in the memory of Benafrida Tigno Gabby affectionately known as Bessie. Bessie was born in Manila Philippines on June 27th 1947. Bessie was the third of four Mariano Tingo and Juana Bangkad Tingno's Living Children. Bessie was raised primarily by a single mother and her oldest brother, Billy, after her father suffered a heart attack when she was two years old. She graduated from UST with a Bachelor of Science in elementary education and was a nursery and kindergarten teacher for about 13 years teaching at reputable schools like Our Lady of Perpetual Health San Beda and LaSalle before she immigrated with her sister to the U.S. on July 4, 1981.

Bessie's first and only home for all of her years in the U. S. was in the city of Balmain Park in the First District. Where all three of her siblings had also recited at one point or another. Bessie worked in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office of Child Support Services Division from December 1987 until her retirement in February of 2020. In July 1992, Bessie and Romy were married in Malolos, Philippines at Bassaronian Church. They both were faithful active members in their parish, St. John the Baptist Church in Baldwin Park.

And Bessie was known best for her sense of humor calling her co-workers including one of those my sister Irma who is also a county employee she used to call her I guess baby cakes She loved teaching her students and her nieces and nephews alike, ensuring they always stayed on top of their studies. She stood very tall, 4'11", small and petite but she was mighty and had a big heart of gold. After suffering her third stroke in life, Bessie passed away on August 2026. She leaves behind many memories filled with laughter and love to all those who knew her. My heart goes out to Bessie's loved ones The Tigno and Gabby family who are also here in the audience today.

And for those that are also watching online, God bless the family and you have our condolences. Thank you. Supervisor Horvath.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed4:01:53

Thank you, Madam Chair. I move that when we adjourn today we adjourn in memory of Karen Martinez-Cohen, a devoted mother, environmental designer and community advocate. Karen Martinez Cohen passed away on September 26th at the age of 63. A proud Mexican-German American born in Pomona, Karen was the youngest of three daughters of Leroy Martinez Jr. and Rita Eva Marie Murmell.

Her curiosity and creativity were evident from childhood. She once read the entire dictionary and spent her afternoons drawing elaborate maze puzzles Karen built a 30-year career in residential real estate in West Los Angeles, but her passion was creating homes that were more sustainable, efficient and resilient. For more than 25 years she worked as an owner builder drawing plans by hand and overseeing six residential rebuilds in the Pacific Palisades area. When the Palisades fire destroyed Karen's Sunset Mesa home, she responded by turning her own loss into an effort to help her neighbors rebuild. She began planning a new home using non-combustible materials while researching ways for other fire survivors to access safer more affordable building materials and potentially reduce insurance costs What began with her own rebuild grew into a broader effort to rethink how communities recover from wildfire, drawing local, national and international attention to Karen's advocacy for safer and more resilient homes.

And I can say she truly pushed our county department to not allow her to not see her vision through. She did not take no for an answer and we are the better for it. Karen is survived by her son Max, her daughter Ariel, her father Leroy Martinez Jr., her sister Melissa Reiner and her beloved nieces and nephews. We adjourn today in honor of Karen Martinez Cohen recognizing the love she had for her family, her determination to build a safer and more resilient future.

I move that when we adjourn today, we adjourn in memory of Judy Fenton, a devoted wife, mother, grandmother and longtime Beverly Hills resident businesswoman, civic leader and community volunteer who passed away peacefully on Tuesday September 22nd just shy of her 84th birthday. A graduate of Los Angeles High School, Judy began her career in nursing working with noted Beverly Hills pediatrician Dr. Mayo Stark. In 1978 she purchased the Beverly Hills Baseball and Sports Camp which she grew from about 100 children in its first summer to more than 700 campers in 1991.

Also in 1991 she founded FTA an events and marketing company dedicated to the growth of the Beverly Hills community. Through FTA, she worked for more than 30 years with Beverly Hills Firefighters Association and for 25 years with the Beverly Hills Police Officers Association. For more than four decades, Judy was a respected and influential presence in Beverly Hills civic life. She served eight years on the Traffic and Parking Commission and later on the Parks and Recreation Commission from 2018 to 2020.

Her service reached across the Beverly Hills community from Cedar Sinai Helping Hearts in the early 1970s to the boards of the Beverly Hills Chamber of Commerce, the Beverly Hills 9-11 Committee, Temple Emanuel, and the Beverly Hills Rotary Club. She spent 17 years as Director of Development at the Maple Counseling Center, where she also served as Interim Executive Director.

Though her schedule was always full, her family came first. She was pre-deceased by her husband of 55 years, Frank Fenton and is survived by their children Mindy, Gary, Steven and Jennifer. Her six grandchildren Kelly, Sean, Brady, Carter, Caden and Parker and her three step-grandchildren Lexi, Troy and Nate. Judy will be remembered for her energy, loyalty, determination and generosity. And for the countless lives she touched but above all she will be remembered for her deep commitment to family friends and the Beverly Hills community she called home And finally I move that when we adjourn today, we adjourn in memory of Presley Gerber. A model, photographer and lifelong Southern Californian, Presley passed away on September 20th at the age of 27.

Born in Los Angeles and raised in Malibu alongside his younger sister Kaya, Presley grew up with a love for photography, surfing and skating before finding his own place in the fashion industry. He began modeling as a teenager and made his runway debut at 16, later working with major fashion houses and brands. As he grew older, Presley also became increasingly open about the challenges he faced in his personal life.

He spoke publicly about mental health and recovery and used this platform to encourage more honest conversations about emotional well-being including through his Mental Health Mondays series That willingness to be vulnerable became another part of how he connected with others and allowed people to see beyond the public image that had surrounded him from a young age.

Presley is survived by his parents, Cindy Crawford and Randy Gerber, and his younger sister Kaya Gerber. His loss is deeply felt by his family friends in the Malibu community. We adjourn today in honor of Presley remembering his creativity, his openness, and a life that ended far too soon.

4:07 – 4:172 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:07:49

Thank you. Before we adjourn, I do want to just mention the young man that fell to his death at Franklin High School, 17-year old Highland Park Highland School student. His name was Xavier Nangaray Martinez and he passed on September 30th. So we also want to adjourn in his memory with his family and with the school staff and with all that knew him. He was bullied, and it's unfortunate that when that happens bad things occur. So we'll adjourn in his memory. So with that members thank you. We'll take all those motions as seconded. If there is no objection to a unanimous vote that will be the order.

And Executive Officer please read us into closed session.

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction4:08:43

Members of the public, the board will now be going into closed session. In accordance with the Brown Act requirements, notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors will convene in closed session to discuss item number CS3, Conference with Labor Negotiators Joseph M. Nikita and Designated Staff as indicated on the posted and supplemental agendas. You.

Yeah. Yeah. Hello. Hello, everyone. The. The following is a report of action taken in closed session on October 6, 2026. Item number CS3 Conference with Labor Negotiators. No reportable action was taken.

4:17 – 4:196 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:17:40

Great, that concludes today's meeting and the next meeting on October 13th has been canceled. So our next regular meeting will be on the Board of Supervisors on October 20th, 2026 at 930 a.m., and we are officially adjourned. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed4:18:35

Stopped at 247, not the time I did it. It's

CommentAnd Executive OfficerProposed · by introduction4:18:40

ghosts of those veterans who committed suicide telling their stories as holograms

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed4:18:47

inside the room.

CommentDionna PortisProposedself-stated4:18:48

We would watch the compound for three weeks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed4:18:51

For me, it really talked to my experience being over in Iraq. It really is chaos. One minute it's quiet and then all of a sudden it's chaos so I think that the artist has done a really good job of kind of setting that narrative and you know in the room there's a rotating clip of three different stories of unique experiences that separate veterans have had but I think really kind of get people thinking