UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:184 turns
♪ The City of Carpinteria is a city in the United States. ♪ Ooh, ooh-ooh-ooh ♪ Oh.
Carpinteria City Council meeting. Hello all. Today is February 9th, 2026 and I'd like to welcome you all to the Carpinteria City Council meeting. We will be officially calling this meeting to order and I'll ask for a roll call please.
Roll call, called by City Clerk
Show transcript
And we will start our meeting with our first item, which is a presentation by the Carpinteria Sanitary District about the district's facilities, challenges and opportunities in the Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project. Welcome.
Wasting no time. Thank you. Well good evening Mayor Alarcon, council members. Thank you very much for having me here tonight I'm just going to give you a short kind of update presentation telling you folks probably some things you already know but the public may not know much about the Carpinteria Sanitary District often they think we're part of this city Yeah, okay thanks Brian. If you go to the previous slide, Carpinteria Sanitary District was formed in 1928 so two years from now we're going to celebrate our 100th anniversary.
We have a five-member board of directors they're elected. A few years ago we transitioned to division based elections so now they're elected from five different geographic divisions We have 18 people on our staff, so a pretty small team relatively speaking. We have licensed operators, we have professional field staff, we have a laboratory certified environmental laboratory, so we have a lab director, we have finance folks and administrative staff as well.
Our staff ranges from entry-level people to team members who have been there for 30 plus years. So quite a broad spectrum. Our job, and I put it in parentheses now because it is changing and I'll share a little bit about that but our job is to collect treat and discharge wastewater safely 24 hours a day seven days a week 365 days a year. It keeps flowing We serve about 4,500 different customers. 4,500 residential, industrial and commercial customers. 93% of our customers are residential so mostly a residential community from our standpoint.
Our revenue comes from annual sewer service charges that we charge to all of our customers. Residential customers pay about $825 a year for sewer service. Non-residential customers pay based on the volume of water they discharge and the strength of the wastewater they discharge. We have a website, it's there carpsand.com and we have a social media presence so we try to get our message out as best we can Next slide, please.
Just an overview on our facilities. Now we have over 42 linear miles of gravity sewer pipeline. Dates back to the 1930s. Much of the downtown area was sewered in the early part of the 1930's. The bulk of the system kind of got built out as the city developed into the residential suburban areas. Our pipes range in size from 6-inch diameter up to 24-inch diameter. And it's mostly like that 60s and earlier period was all clay pipe, so it's vitrified clay pipe.
We've rehabilitated a lot of that over the years, so it's now lined a fair bit of it. But some of the pipe even from the 30s is still in perfect condition. We have three beach communities that we serve using a low-pressure sewer system. So our service area serves Rincon Point to the south or to east rather all the way out to the very western end of Padera Lane. So all of the city and some areas outside of the city.
We have eight wastewater pump stations. Two of our largest pump stations were built at that same time the downtown sewers were built in the 1930s. At that time, they really just did screening and then discharged from those to the ocean. Our pump station service small little developments of 20 homes all the way up to 70% of our entire flow goes through our largest pump station.
And we have a wastewater treatment facility. The first plant here was built in around 1951, it was upgraded and it's now designed to treat up to two-and-a-half million gallons of wastewater each day. Our flow rate, average flow rate now is about 1.2 so not even quite half of our capacity and the 20 years I've been there we've seen flows drop off really because of conservation So a lot lower than they were even two decades ago. Our treatment process is, it's a pretty standard municipal wastewater treatment process. It's called the secondary treatment process.
We have disinfection and then we discharge via an ocean outfall. Our treatment plan was, basically it's all been rebuilt. We did a big upgrade in the early 90s and then in 2015 we did another upgrade so the entire plant is in really great condition. We have an administrative office and a boardroom down on 6th Street, 5300 6th Street that was rebuilt and completed in 2022.
And we have a board room that we provide as a community space for non-profit and other use as well. I think that's just cycling through, Brian. Sorry. If you go back one, you can see an overview of our wastewater treatment facility. It is right along Carpinteria Creek there to the east and north of the railroad tracks and the state beach. So tucked into the downtown area. That's a picture of our administration building, and you can see the boardroom on the right.
If you got one more, thanks. So this is just to share some little humble brag, but I think the residents should know that we have a really high-performing wastewater utility in Carpinteria. We were twice awarded the very best treatment plant in the state of California by the CWA, California Water Environment Association and twice also the best performing collection system in the state of California.
So that's, we're proud of that. Challenges and opportunities, I call this next page. And this will be familiar to you guys. One of our biggest challenges is cost of living and hiring and retention of staff. A few years ago we had about 50% of our staff living here in Carpinteria and that's now transitioning the other way and people have moved to Ventura County and for us it just means Longer response times, really when we need people here it takes a little longer.
We've also seen a serious shift in upward pressure on salaries and benefits. You know peer agencies are competing for the same small pool of people and that's just the consequence of that. When we need to hire certified higher level staff it really is a challenge. We had a recruitment that took two years for a certified staff member Another challenge is inflation and construction cost escalation.
Kind of after that COVID period, we saw costs for materials and equipment really sharply escalate, and unfortunately they haven't come back down. Tariff impacts now, whether they're real or they're just perceived, we are seeing that hit our bottom line for equipment primarily. Underground construction, and this is just how it's gone. We've seen construction costs for pipelines and so forth really kind of double maybe triple in cost per unit foot.
In general, construction costs really have outpaced inflation for municipal-type projects. It's a story I'm sure you all hear often. Some opportunities are good things. Energy management we've been focusing on at the district. The solar panels on our admin building power all of our functions there on the administrative side. We're about to implement a battery energy storage project that will provide some grid reliability improvements and some cost savings for our operations at the treatment plant. We do use a lot of power there, so anything we can do to save theirs is very helpful.
And we're in the middle of an EV or electric vehicle transition. Some of it's voluntary, some of it's the state pushing us that direction but we do have the first all-electric CCTV or closed circuit TV pipeline inspection vehicle in the state. We had the first one and now we're transitioning you know buying pickups that are all electric And climate change adaptation, this is something we focused on. We have worked with the city in kind of that climate change assessment and planning and I think that's really important for us to work together, collaborate on those kinds of issues for this community.
Next slide, and I know you all heard from Bob McDonald the Water District Manager a couple months ago maybe about the Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project. I just want to share a little bit of our perspective. So it's a partnership project that is with the Sanitary District and the Water District We've been very involved over 10 years planning, developing the project and getting to the design phase with the Water District. The city was originally a participant at kind of the feasibility study stage.
The project has a governance structure where we've entered into a joint exercise of powers agreement with the Water District. We'll be leasing part of our facility site to the Water District And our staff will be operating a new advanced water treatment facility for the CAP project. It is a water supply project primarily, so the Water District is funding the vast majority of the project but we're going to be hosting the site, the facility and we'll be doing contract operation of the new plant.
Advanced Water Purification Facility. This is a big change for us, but it is a proven process that we're implementing. Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District, they collaborate on a project called Groundwater Replenishment System. They make 130 million gallons of purified water every day for groundwater augmentation. And many agencies throughout the state are either implementing similar projects or they're going this direction.
It's a multi-step process. There's an initial filtration step, then there's ultrafiltration. This is a low pressure membrane process that removes all of the solids in the treated water. Reverse osmosis is a high pressure membrane treatment step that removes most all of the soluble dissolves Constituents in the water. And then the last step is ultraviolet light advanced oxidation, and this is a high intensity light with an oxidizing agent added and anything that had potentially got through reverse osmosis step gets destroyed by that process.
And then the water is so pure we actually have to add back alkalinity to the water so it's not corrosive to the formation when we put it into the groundwater basin. Purified water systems are highly regulated in California. We'll have a whole bunch of permits to operate this project and follow the strict standards set up by the state of California. Sophisticated continuous monitoring of all of the treatment processes is a requirement, and we'll have a rigorous sampling program as this thing goes into operation.
And then, where are we at now that advanced water purification construction is upon us. The Water District awarded a $61 million construction contract to a company called Walsh Construction. The construction activities are going to start this spring, and we're projecting about a three-year project duration. And some of that is long lead items that take a long time to get built like electrical switchgear.
And then at the tail end there's a really long startup and commissioning and validation process to make sure that what we've built is really going to work for the long term. Some key components. There's a 250,000 gallon buried concrete equalization tank Our flows that come into the wastewater plant, they cycle during the day. And this treatment process wants to run at a steady state so we're building a tank to equalize the flow.
There's a 12,000 square foot process building that will house all of the equipment and the piping and the control systems. There's a pure water pump station that'll deliver the purified water across town and down into the groundwater basin. And we'll have a new Edison service, and improvements to our entry at the treatment plant itself. So some cool facts I call them. This project is going to purify 100% of our average dry weather flow in Carpinteria.
It will be the first agency in the state to be able to say that. CAP is going to reduce the volume of discharge to the ocean by 85%. What will go out will really be just what the reverse osmosis part of that treatment process rejects or doesn't allow it to pass through. And it'll add high-paying professional jobs to our local economy for a long time, so... Just a couple more quick slides to look at.
Next one Brian, if you remember that overview shot there was a big paved vacant area in the middle of our treatment plant but we're going to fill up most of that with this new advanced water treatment facility and then here's just another quick view the next slide is rendering of the building that will be in the middle of our fully developed site already. And it'll match the architectural elements that are already at the facility, so...
That's what I had to present tonight but I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.
0:18 – 0:2323 turns
Thank you. Any questions?
Yeah, well first I wanted to thank you for making yourself and the district accessible to us. I was fortunate to get a tour from you last year and I was really impressed by the water purification process that typically happens and then also the CAP process so for people who might have questions about CAP or want to get more information where would you direct them? I'm sure you have things on your website but what types of resources can they find?
Yeah, thank you for the question. There is a website dedicated to the CAP project and that's easiest to get through by going to the Water District's main page. You can get there from our page as well and there's a lot of information there. And the Water District has an outreach team that is ramping up now some...a lot of outreach regarding construction related impacts but also information about the project in the process and a little bit about the rates I think so.
That's really good, because I know it is a complicated concept for people understandably to take on. But just having seen firsthand the kind of filtration you do already and then learning from you in depth what that CAP project is going to look like, it's very exciting to look forward to. So thank you for the presentation.
Craig, a couple of questions for you. First of all, you said some of the water, well 15% of the water that is going to go through the system will be discharged I guess as it's rejected from the reverse osmosis process. Could you give us the quality level of that water that is being discharged back into the ocean?
Yeah, thank you for the question. It's 15% is about of the total flow. Maybe that's what you said but one of the things that's important to realize is that the loading to the receiving water or the ocean, the mass of the discharge is the same as it is now and actually it'll be a little bit lower but we've done a lot of work. We did some pilot testing and we've been meeting a lot with the regulatory agencies to make sure that what does go out is fully compliant with even our existing permit standards. So it'll be a little bit more concentrated, a little less water molecules in there but the net effect should be no change.
Okay so it's basically the same quality or better than it is currently going out?
Yeah. And it's a product of increased dilution and concentration of the other constituents. Understood.
One other question I have then, beginning some questions regarding the, I would say, the filtration of pharmaceuticals. Is that something that we are looking at? Is that going to be included in the reverse osmosis because realize it won't be working in the UV system?
Well, yeah. Thank you for that question as well. Removal of pharmaceuticals through this entire advanced treatment process is 100%, more or less 99.99999%. And a lot of the removal does happen in the reverse osmosis phase of the process. There are some very small chain types of constituents that can pass through reverse osmosis not necessarily pharmaceuticals but I could give you the names like 1,4-Dioxane, NDMA. These are products that that can pass through in small quantities through reverse osmosis. And that next step, the UVAOP really destroys those at the molecular level so yeah it's the process has been very well proven out over the last 30 years.
Sounds good thank you and thanks for the questions most of that was for informational for the public we do these installs around the world also so I just wanted to confirm that so the public is aware.
Any other questions from Council? No. I'd like to just say thank you for doing your presentation, I think you're right when you say that there's many residents who believe or who think that the Sanitation District is a part of the city and in reality it's operated separately and so can you share if the public wants to have more information when those meetings occur? You mentioned you also have a five-member board
Thank you. Our board meets on the first and third Tuesday of every month at 5 30 p.m.. At our facility 5300 6th Street We sometimes have we'll we have committee meetings that are open to the public as well and our doors are open So if anybody has questions about what we do feel free to come and knock on the door and say hello
Excellent, thank you Appreciate it.
Thank you very much. Have a good evening
you too I'd like to go ahead and open up public comment on this presentation. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone on Zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands. OK.
I will go ahead and close public comment. And do we have to take a motion for this?
Yes. I move to receive and file the presentation.
A second. We have a first and a second. All those in favor?
Aye.
Any opposed?
Good question. Craig, real quick and I think this is for the city also. We also have the Utilities Committee that meets with the Water Department City and you. Do you know if there's any... Have you been talking to the city about updating a new meeting for that one or if that's something that's going to be ongoing?
0:23 – 0:3540 turns
Thank you. I have talked to Mike about that somewhat recently and I think we're going to coordinate with John Lawson and try to get something on the schedule here in the next quarter or so. Sounds good, thank you.
We will now move on to the second item on our agenda which is a temporary adjournment for the purpose of holding the monthly meeting of the Carpinteria Library Board of Trustees
President Alarcon, all board members are present and accounted for and the legal noticing and procedural requirements of the meeting have been met.
Excellent Thank you I'll now open up public comment So this is a time for public comments on matters not otherwise on the agenda But within the subject matter of the Carpinteria Library Board of Trustees We do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone on zoom?
And president Alarcon, we have no raised hands
I will go ahead and close public comment. We will now
move on to item number four, which is the approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 12th, 2026.
I move to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 2026.
Second.
We have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. We will now
move on to item number five, which is the Carpinteria Community Library monthly report for February 2026
Mayor, City Council members. It's my pleasure again to present my staff report for the Carpinteria Community Library. So January was a busy and good month regarding programs and collection updates. We have the Carpinteria Head Start Cafecito on January 8th, that thing advisory board couple of times in January 16th and 30th The teen history class on January 21st, the Santa Barbara Early Music Ensemble on January 24th. The Santa Barbara City College bilingual basic computer classes starting on January 26 and while things talk about California condors on January 28 and our monthly movie night on January 30th. But I would like to emphasize or highlight the three events, the Teen Advisory Board. We met a couple of times in January it was wonderful we have seven teenagers two middle school students and five high school students.
It was a surprise to listen all the ideas that they have All the motivation that they would like to put in working with the library. So there are a lot of ideas that they gave us, so we identified three main or they identified three main focus lines of work. One is They would like to develop a team-led library club. In other words, they want to develop their own teenagers' programs in the library.
The second is input on team focused collection development. So what they want is to advise or recommend titles for that team collection in the library. And the third item is a youth-driven library marketing initiative. So what they want in this item is they would like to collaborate with us in making social media posts and stories, things like that. And they are very eager to work with the library and also develop some programs led by themselves.
We are still accepting new members for the Teen Advisory Board. Our next meeting is going to be February 13th, it's gonna be the second Friday of the month at 3.30 in the afternoon. So, we are planning to meet every second Friday and every fourth Friday of the month continuously. The second program that I would like to highlight is the Santa Barbara City College Bilingual Basic Computer Class. It was a complete success. We offered 20 seats through the SBCC registration. We got actually put here 23 but as today we have 25 students And SBCC brought 20 computers for every student, and they are bringing more computers this week. They asked me to close the registration because they continue receiving a registration, but because it's a college class, very formal, they already closed the class.
But that gave us the idea that there is a demand All the students are Spanish speakers, there is a need in the community and the library is also a place that the community feels safe and trusts us. So that was very nice to see. And they are meeting right now in the library. The program that I would like to highlight is the California Condor presentation. We have 56 attendees. It was very nice to see the response of the Carpinteria residents, to know about how the California Condors program is working in the whole state.
Also, I would like to say that we have ongoing library programs. And I would like to take the advantage of this meeting to name some of them. So the library continues to offer a range of recurring programs including English Conversation Group, the Preschool Storytime, the Carpinteria Writers' Group, the Spanish Language Conversation Group, the Songwriters Workshop, Babies Are The Best Program, the Carpinteria Needles Group, the Dementia Caregiver Support Group, The Game Club every Friday, the Carpinteria Bird Watchers group, the D&D or Dungeons & Dragons playtime and Friday farm sessions. For additional information please go to our website you will see what is happening every month there In regards of our library outreach, once again we received two more classrooms from the Carpinteria Middle School.
A complete new two classrooms and we have 50 students visiting the library. Again they got a new library cards and we present all our services on how we organize our collection. And finally, as I mentioned before we were part of the California State Library Every Story Counts Week and we received 68 surveys. Last week on Friday, I received the results. They are super interesting and I would like to present those results in our next staff report so you can see directly from a third-party survey how the community of Carpinteria sees the library and our services and what they need or their aspirations. It's very interesting and that's all from me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your
report. Any questions from council? Yeah, just one question about the teen
advisory board.
It sounds like you're still looking for members is there an application process or how do teens get involved?
There is a registration it could be online there is a link in our website through the event announcement but it could be in person too and also they can just show up on that day in our next meeting
And then what are the expectations for it? Is it that they attend the meetings, do they have to try to attend every meeting or what's the issue with
it? No. So we are having this group as flexible as possible. They can attend once, they can attend a couple of times, or they can continue coming every week, every meeting if they would like to. As of today, they are coming back In our two meetings that we had already, actually we already have three. One in February. The seven teenagers came back so they and we would like to invite more teenagers because I think it's important to include as much as possible teenagers listen to their ideas and aspirations
No, that's great. And I'm sure knowing that it's more of a casual commitment so if they can't commit to going to every meeting that you still want them to be able
to go? Yes. It is super interesting seeing their interactions. I mean, I had the conception at the beginning that they will be quiet and kind of shy but totally is the opposite. They had a lot of questions and they already sent me a letter asking for some material for The Library of Things collection
That's great, that's great. Thank you very
much. They are planning to come to this meeting next month just to see and learn and also probably they are going to make some comments and they say that they are going to pressure the library director through the council members because they want more games. Just
a spoiler. Thank you very much for the update appreciate
it.
Any other questions? Yes.
On the Santa Barbara City College bilingual basic computer class, are the participants 23 for example, are they given the computers or do they have to borrow it and use it only on site or how does that work?
As of today, they are using the computers just inside in on-site. There are plans from the SBCC to offer the computers to every student who finishes their classes So at the end of the whole class, most probably they are going to receive and keep the computer for themselves. But as of today, they are required to use their computers just in the classroom.
And the 23 participants, are they all Carpinteria or is it from City College? All of them are Carpinterians. They are? Yeah. OK. I'd be interested to talk to you about computer process and I believe we would probably help you out some that way when I say we, that would be Rotary because we've done that globally.
Really? Maybe he'll help you out. Excellent. Yeah, we need more computers. Any
questions? Seeing none, I'm looking forward to seeing the teens' social media and what they'll come up with. Yes, it's going to be very
interesting.
Yeah. Great. Thank you for encouraging the teens and creating a space for them to really advocate for themselves.
Sure. Yeah, I know that it was part of the strategic plan and also something that a lot of people and parents were wishing to see in the library. And we are taking this very seriously.
Seeing no other questions I will go ahead and open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips, do we have anyone on Zoom?
We have no raised hands.
I'll go ahead and close public comment bring it back to the council for any other questions comments or emotion.
I'll move to receive and file the monthly library report. Second.
We have a first and a second all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Okay thank you Item number six is new business and discussion. Do we have anything from council? Seeing none,
we will move on to item number seven which is the adjournment of the Carpinteria Library Board of Trustees. And we will reconvene the regular meeting of the City Council and we will now receive public information reports and announcements that we will hear from our, from the Sheriff's Office and hear from our Chief. Welcome.
0:36 – 0:4919 turns
Good
evening mayor, council members, city staff and Carpinteria community members. This month I just kind of threw several different cases out there just to give you a kind of an idea what we're dealing with so in the 5300 block of Carpinteria Avenue we had an indecent exposure deputies responded to a radio call of the subject exposing himself in front of the Carpinteria Middle School And the subject was eventually located approximately 100 feet east of the school with his pants still down.
And he was ultimately arrested for indecent exposure and booked at the county jail. In the 5900 block of Hickory Street, we had a violation of a court order where the suspect was located inside the listed restricted apartment and within 100 yards of the protected party of an active served emergency protective order. He was arrested for the violation and transported to county jail.
At the Amtrak station, we had a reported intoxicated female that was causing a disturbance. What happened was the conductor called she refused to leave the train so they called for our response. They requested a citizen's arrest for trespassing. She was extremely intoxicated, she refused our orders to leave as well but she was escorted off the train by deputies And she continuously resisted deputies in an effort to move her off the train. When we were trying to move her off the train, she grabbed one of our deputies' nightsticks. She refused to be placed in the vehicle. She was ultimately booked into Santa Barbara Jail on multiple charges including trespassing, minor possession of alcohol, drunk in public and assault on a peace officer because she tried to kick one of our deputies.
Actually, she tried to kick me I was working that day so but Unsuccessful, that's why it's a salt and not a battery. And then we had a juvenile on an illegal electric motorcycle on Linden in Sandyland. The juvenile was observed operating an electronic electric motorcycle heading northbound on Linden. He refused to stop at a stop sign, traveling approximately 22 miles an hour.
And deputies followed from a safe distance and observed the juvenile again continue to drive in an unsafe manner. The juvenile turned onto the bike path and nearly hit another bicyclist and got away from our deputy. Who was not in pursuit but just trying to contact him, but he kind of fled through the bike path. And then we ended up locating him later on and recognized what he was wearing and called that deputy over and he made it. So this deputy actually warned him a month ago about that electric scooter which is totally illegal. So he was cited for multiple violations and his motorcycle was towed on a 48 hour hold.
Some community outreach. I want to just let people know, I don't know if they do know this but members of the public at least 18 years of age or 14-17 if you have your parents permission may request to do a ride along with a local deputy here out of the Carpinteria station. Once you submit the application and clearance is granted by the Sheriff's Office, you can spend a shift or a portion of the shift. You don't have to stay a whole shift. Our shifts are 12 hours. That's a little bit of a long time.
And ride in the passenger seat with one of our deputies. And kind of get a feel what's going on. If you are interested in this, I suggest come for the briefing. You'll hear kind of what the deputies talk about dialogue back and forth how they go over tactical scenarios and learn from videos and talking about policy and other things. And then on January 27th, just so you know our Vice Mayor Solorzano participating in a morning briefing and subsequent patrol shift observing a local deputy on patrol. So I think you stayed maybe four or five hours?
Yes
yes I did.
And i'll just say just to add to what you're saying it was a very helpful and useful exercise to take part in I thought it was really informative just to know more about all the training that the deputies do every single day and then just to be able to experience what is being in the car with the deputy as they're going around and seeing what you're looking for, what you're monitoring. I thought it was helpful And the deputy that I was with, I appreciated too that he reiterated something we've heard from you which is that our sheriff representatives are not looking to be immigration enforcement officers in any way. And that was really emphasized and I thought that makes it, I think residents feel safer when we do see your cars driving around so all in all it was a really positive experience and I highly recommend it to anybody in the community to take advantage of that.
Thank you. I'm glad it was a good time for you, and I think he learned a lot so that's good. And then for our Chief's message... So going back to our indecent exposure, I just want to thank whoever the reporting party was on that called regarding this male suspect exposing himself. And I want to remind community members to please remain involved and call in suspicious behavior because Honestly, we've got those calls before and by the time we get there they're gone. So don't wait just if you see something like call it in immediately and that way we could get out there in time and make an arrest.
We talked about drunken public. We have multiple drunken public arrests this month and I just want to remind people or enlighten them that You the public your front yard could be is considered public. So if you're drunk in public now, not that we're going to come grab you out of your front yard if you're having a beer whatnot right but I mean If you're intoxicated to the point where we can't control you and this and that your front yard is a public place so I have seen people arrested out of their front yard because they're a danger to somebody else or themselves and Most times I think the mayor saw recently like if we could get you home right there and somebody could take care of you, that's great. But if you're intoxicated to the point where you're not going to listen and things are just gonna go south and we're gonna end up back here then your front yard is public so just too enlightening there a little bit.
If you're listed on a restraining order, I talked about a restraining order before as a restricted person meaning you're not the protected party. The restricted party will be arrested If they have violated a no contact clause or is it within 100 feet of the clause. So that means if you are the restricted party, you're the person that's not supposed to have contact per the court order and this person is the protected party and the protected party invites the restricted party over or calls what?
The protected party is not gonna go to jail. The restricted party will go to jail, guaranteed. So you can't be, just stay away from that a lot of people I don't think understand that so even if the protected party invites the restricted party over it's still the restricted person is on the court order to not have any contact. So just know that and then there's a math clause.
It's the math clause stands for a lot of times you'll see it Restraining order and it's a no math. It says do not molest annoy threaten or harass So you got basically be good and you can have, you know if contact or whatever But you can't do those types of things and then you have your no-contact clause where it's absolutely No contact or you can't be within a certain amount of feet from this person And that's what I have for you this month and I'm open for any questions
Any questions No questions. Thank you for your report.
You're welcome
I will go ahead and open up public comment, I do not have Is this a speaker slip for this item? Excellent Welcome Mr. Rogelio Delgado.
Thank you Rogelio Delgado Carpinteria resident Question about citizen's arrest. Do you have the evidence before you call the sheriff? Because a couple of people last year told me that they didn't know that they could have made a citizen's arrest. Someone was yelling for a few minutes in the middle of the night to a neighbor and In the morning, she told me that she didn't know what to do.
She didn't think that it was serious enough to call the sheriff and she didn't even know that she's going to make a citizen arrest so that's one question. What about It's a, he says she says issue where you know that it's true but the other person denies that. How does the responding officer reacts to that? Because I know of a case and that's basically the questions that I have Thank you.
Thank you for your comment. Do we have any other public comment speakers in the room? Seeing none, Brian do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor we have no raised hands.
I'll go ahead and close public comment, and then I'll just ask the chief if you could just provide an explanation for what a citizen's arrest is.
So a citizen's arrest is when there's like a misdemeanor—I'm not sure, I thought I heard maybe a knife or something like that—but when there's a misdemeanor committed or felony whatnot but I mean we cannot arrest somebody for a misdemeanor not committed in our presence. I mean, we could write a report or whatnot but i mean so if we're called out and something transpired but they want to make a citizen's rest that doesn't mean they actually arrest them although technically you can make a citizen's arrest right? If something happened but i don't suggest that right? That means when we if we take custody of this person for what happened The citizen is the one technically arresting this person. So, the citizen or the community member is going to have to go to court because we'll just simply write what happened and they're gonna have to go to court and they're gonna have to testify on what happened because we were not there to witness it and it was a misdemeanor.
And also if we come I don't know, I didn't understand if the evidence has to happen yet. I think maybe he said maybe somebody's threatening with a knife and then maybe wait for something bad to happen but threatening with a knife is a 417 of the penal code that's a felony if you have a knife in your hand and you're threatening somebody so I wouldn't wait. I would definitely call when we come out so if you ever have any question call us but if we show up and it's a he said she said I mean we have to look at the totality of the circumstances We go through this all the time. A lot of times we get out there and it's not really a crime that transpired, so we have to figure it out or if he says she said...
There's no injury or there's no way to really figure it out. Like, okay this person has an injury here and this person has a swollen knuckle. I mean you can kind of put two and two together but if there's no evidence of any crime or whatnot and people... And then we could write it up and just send it to the DA for filing a complaint with a district attorney. So they're handled in all kinds of different ways. Sometimes people do go to jail on citizen's arrest and sometimes they don't. Sometimes we just send it off so I hope that answered the question.
Yeah, that was helpful and i think it was also helpful for you to say that you wouldn't recommend that someone would go and...
Yeah yeah i don't recommend doing that right so call us and uh and if you ever have any doubt call us that's why we're here right? So if you're if it's pondering back and forth you probably should call.
Thank you thank you for your presentation.
Thank you.
We will now move on to the city manager's report
0:49 – 0:577 turns
Thank you, Mayor, Council, community members. Sorry it's dual identification through the phone and computer. I suppose I'll start by saying I feel really bad about sitting here drinking my tea. And maybe you feel the same, but very sorry. So just a little update on our recruitments I'll start by saying that we don't always cover everything in a City Manager's Report. I encourage anyone listening at home or here in attendance to go through the City Manager's Report for all the details, there are also links to information I encourage people to look at This is not meant as an agenda item but more as updates, but happy to agendize any matter for future discussion if the council has interest. So for our recruitments we have a lifeguard program coordinator 1-2-3 pending interviews and we also have new employee Kasey Wysocki and aqua instructor 2 that will be starting in two days time so excited To have Casey on board.
In terms of training, the city keeps its commitment to continually training our staff and there's so many different trainings that it really can be a monthly sort of situation. On the 29th, staff from all departments attended a training provided by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority or CJPIA Staff learned about legal considerations that guide municipal response efforts, environmental and employee safety protocols, homelessness encampment cleanup procedures and best practices for engaging unhoused individuals with dignity empathy and patience.
We also I just want to remind people that our assessment district ballots are still out there. Our public hearing is scheduled for March 9th and you can turn in your ballots up until the end of that hearing on that day, also letting people know that if they lost their ballot or even if they wish Change their vote or anything. We actually they can come in here to City Hall and get a new ballot if they lost it, or if they wish to change your vote for whatever reason are able to do that here And then just a few quick things on Recreation so age well is hosting a beating workshop on Thursday February 26 from 1 to 2 30 at our Veterans Hall meeting room There's also going to be an Aloha Friday luau.
It's the age well annual dance and This will be on Friday, February 13th at 5 30 p.m At the Veterans Memorial Hall RSVP is requested and people can do so by calling 8 0 5 8 8 1 1 2 7 9 or emailing agewell at Carpinteria CA gov Our Parks, Recreation and Community Services facilities including the pool, library and age-well programming will be closed this Monday February 16th in observance of President's Day and that also includes City Hall.
And another lecture series through Age Well, the Advanced Care Directive Workshop. I believe we've had this a few times now and so it's been more popular one. And so it's a two-part advanced care directive workshop. The first part will be on February 5th. from 1 to 2.30 p.m at the Veterans Hall meeting room, with a second workshop held on February 12th from 1 to 2. 30 in the same location.
And finally for me, Community Garden in January. The garden composting systems diverted 128.5 pounds of food and garden scraps from the landfill And revived in September 2025 by the Community Garden Coordinator, the systems collect food and garden scraps from the community garden members in a city hall break room. So that's where they're getting that from. And so I'm happy to answer any questions on anything I've discussed. If not, I have Community Development Director Nick Bobroff here to give updates on development applications.
Any questions from Council?
Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor Ellercott and council members. I've got just a couple updates for you here related to development projects First I wanted to provide you with an update on several of our pending housing project applications these are just very brief updates but the Via Real townhomes project at 6380 via real was called incomplete for its third time last week They are getting really close they have just a few kind of Items that they need to dot the I's and cross the T's on on their application So I expect when they do resubmit here sometime in the next few weeks that we may be ready to call it complete And then the other update is related to the 5885 Carpinteria Avenue Residences project. That's next door on the tea time property or bluffs one We sent the applicant a letter at the end of last month letting them know that we've determined that project will require preparation of an environmental impact report and to go along with that, we are currently soliciting proposals from environmental consultants to prepare that report.
And we expect to have a consultant selected and brought back to your council for approval sometime in March Coming up this Thursday, February 12th will be our next Architecture Review Board meeting. We have one item on the agenda which is final design review for the Vier Real Hotel project at 4110 Vier Real. So the staff report for that is up on our city website and that meeting will be held at 530 here in the council chambers again this Thursday.
And then finally, I know I've mentioned this in the last couple of City Manager's Report updates but I just want to remind viewers once again that the Environmental Impact Report or EIR for the Surfliner Inn project is available for public review and comments until March 9th. We will be holding a public meeting with the city's environmental review committee on February 18th at 530pm here in the council chambers. That's next Thursday And the purpose of that meeting is to share and present the findings of the environmental impact report and to solicit public comments on The adequacy of that document and that concludes my updates unless you have any questions for me
Any questions I Have a question about the property on the near tea time or onto your time tea time. Is that application complete? I
Mayor Alarcon, yes. That application was deemed incomplete I believe right around Christmas or just before the new year and so since that time we've moved into these next stages which is to begin the environmental review process and also to begin the consistency analysis for the project.
Thank you.
0:57 – 1:0514 turns
Sorry there's disagreement here about whether I said deemed complete or deemed incomplete. I believe I said deemed complete
I heard
incomplete,
but this is helpful.
The application was deemed complete for the Bluffs One Tea Time project.
Okay that makes sense.
But not for the builder's remedy aspect?
We haven't ever acknowledged or agreed to the fact that the project is covered under the builders remedy. That remains a kind of unresolved matter with the applicant
And just to clarify, Council Member Clark, through the mayor, deeming an application complete does not in any way entitle the project. It just allows the project to start moving through the city's normal development or standard development review process.
Any other questions? And just for anybody that's listening or that maybe that's the first time they've heard about it, is this something where people can view information about this application on our website?
Through the mayor, council member, mayor. Yes we do have a housing page on our city website. The easiest way folks can get there is to go to the city homepage carpinteriaca.gov scroll down to the very bottom of the page under hot topics you'll see a button therefore Housing if you click on that button and you look down through the different sections, you'll see a section Forgot exactly what it's called something like pending housing projects or proposed housing projects And then there's individual links under that section for each of our larger pending housing projects. And so if you click on that link It'll take you to all official correspondence back and forth with the applicant on each of those projects So you can see their submit a letter to us our response so on and so forth And then project plans and technical studies and those types of materials are available for viewing here at City Hall during regular business hours
Thank you
Mayor, I'm happy to take any more questions for Nick but i do have one other person I'd like to bring up before we're done. Great thank you. Thank you Nick. I'd like to bring up Stephan Downs he's our management analyst too in public works so this isn't on the city manager's report we're planning to bring this back to you at the next meeting but Stephan was able to get up we'll call it a beta version of what we had discussed at our last council meeting and this is related to The period one reports, which is our quarter one and quarter two activities. I'd mentioned to your council that in addition to the department summary reports that we were working on something where somebody could go online and view every single goal and objective in detail with all the activity that had been reported And again, Stephan was the amazing architect behind this.
Happy to share that with you and then take any feedback before we upload all the rest of the departments if there's anything that we need to correct or try to make better happy to do so before we do the final upload. And I'll turn it over to Stephan.
All right, good evening Council. So as Michael mentioned there's different parts of the strategic plan in regards to the tracking and the reporting. The first is collecting the data. The target audience is the directors and city manager for review. The second part of the process is the department summaries which you guys saw at the previous council meeting and the staff report which is just a brief summary. And then the final part is an interactive web page that we'll show you So we will probably link it to Hot Topics or have it somewhere available on the homepage, but the strategic plan landing page will be this.
And it just covers what the strategic plan is when it was adopted and then below it shows you what you'll find on this page. If you scroll down, it'll show all of the council goals and priorities. They align with what was adopted in March and just reiterates what they are. And you can just click these. So if you click, it'll show you the different priorities and goals.
And then right here, oh sorry. And then this is, the next part is Strategic Plan Reporting Schedule so this shows you Each period was a time frame being reported on, and then when you can expect the updates to be applied to this website. So reporting period one was from July 1st through December. It includes both quarter one and quarter two. The release of strategic plan activity reports will be available in February 2026. And then that's consistent for second reporting period third and fourth.
And then lastly, these will be the links to the department webpages. So each department has a hyperlinked image. You click on the Department of Interest it'll take you to their webpage and here kind of reiterates what the strategic plan is. Parks for example they had 31 department goals across four core programs And then again, it'll show you what you can expect to find below.
Which is the department summaries that were part of the staff report. The second thing is individual goal sheets. They'll just detail all the goals, their status, their objective performance measures and then status updates. And then the last one is an interactive module where you can filter based on whatever you're interested in. So you could filter by priority, start date, status and I'll show you that.
So period one reporting department highlights. These are identical to what were in the staff report, they're just here in case someone's interested. Down here these are the individual goals. I'll start with this so this is the strategic plan module This is best viewed on desktop. On phone, the document's too large to really see so we recommend using it on computer but this allows you to sort by the program in the department so for parks its administration pool library and I can't see the fourth ocean beach services then you can filter Let's say your interest is administration, you can click this and it will refine the goals to what are relevant to administration. And then you can refine by start year and as you apply more filters the applicable goals gets reduced.
From there you can click them and the status will change, the objective, the performance measure, and the period activity report. And each department will have its own strategic plan module. For people that prefer the one-page documents, I understand that or if you're on iPhone you can't access this module we also made single individual page sheets so if you were to click this Each goal has its own sheet that reflects the same information that's being shown in the dashboard.
So it has the department, the authority which is a priority and the strategic goal alignment with City Council, the program, the goal, the objective, the performance measure period summary and then eventually as we go further these will fill as well. But that's it and just looking for any feedback or improvement or ways we could make it more accessible.
1:05 – 1:1315 turns
Great, thank you Stefan Yeah, so again we thought we'd take advantage of the fact that we had one up and going tonight. It is very very detailed and that was the thing we have the one that's the summary I think that's the one at the bulk of people would be interested in but in wanting to be fully transparent and people wanting to see every single activity. Again we do have the desktop version and I should preface this by saying that Stephan is doing all of this with bare bones technology that we have here. Most of this is Excel and other things, and so he's kind of performing miracles here. But for anyone that wants to get all the way down to a granular sort of data they can go here and see everything. So it's going to be very long and there's going to be a lot but that's the goal of this one and the other one will be the summary.
You don't have to provide any feedback this evening, happy to receive it and also take it after before we upload the rest of the departments. And that concludes City Manager's Report.
Oh, can I just make a quick question? Sorry. It's not a question but I just want to thank Stephan. I know that the database in particular was your brainchild that you created and it's just fantastic and I think it's going to help people who really want to get into the nitty-gritty of the budget and of the priorities and how it all connects in a way that we never could have done before so thank you so much for putting your expertise to that. It is really going to serve this city very well.
Any other questions or comments? When can we expect the site to be uploaded and up-to-date?
Mayor, so without having to do any other updates from this evening, we should have it up easily before your next council meeting. Most likely sooner.
Great! And then my other question for you is how frequently will it be updated?
So those will be updated every single time we do a period report. And then there'll be a running thing of every report made for every period now that won't be for every goal because some goals might be complete in first period and they won't have this ongoing reporting But for those that are over the two years or some don't even start until year two You'll see nothing in period one or two and not until the third but it was just a nice standard format to be able to do that, so
Thank you. Looking forward to that Okay, we will now open it up to public comment and I have one speaker slip. Mr. Rogelio Delgado
Thank you. I'm Rogelio Delgado Carpinteria, resident. These are observations that some people have approached me with or that I have heard in the street coffee shops And in a way, I think they are right because they need more information. Number one, is the assessment a one-time fee? Number two, how long is it going to be for like a mortgage, 30 years? Number three, will it increase over the years?
And this question, that's right. Because on the literature that you sent and even on the letter that the city sent, it doesn't...and I have read a lot on this, couldn't find anything about whether Whether it's going to be, will increase or not. It just says $165 annually if I'm not mistaken and that's it. I think that it fits under our property tax bill It will increase.
The only thing that never increases is the fixed 30-year mortgage, that's it. That will never change unless you refinance but if you don't it will stay there forever for three years so I think that we need some information about that how long? I mean for how much Now, there's some research that says between 3% and 6%, depending on the index. Please say if that is so because that way people can make a decision before they vote.
Number four, why the burden on property owners? Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. Do we have anyone else in the audience who would like to speak? Yes, Roslyn? I
was just wondering if my age-well comments are appropriate under this city?
For the city manager's reports, sure. I mean there are some age well bullet points under that report.
Okay thank you. Haven't been here for a while which i'm sure you're all happy about but If this didn't cut into my cocktail time, I would be here much more often because I could not come enough times to thank the city. I mean seriously now, to thank the city for the support of the Age Well program. And for Jenna and Amy, the staff. It's been a while now since Age Well was implemented with city staff and longer than that as you all know since the inception of the idea.
And still to this day when I'm out in the public people are coming up and extolling The virtues of the programs, the various programs that Jenna has implemented. And the number of volunteers that make all the programs possible and the staff meaning Jenna and Amy so again I just want to thank the city for their support. I know budget is always a tight subject and that's why like to say publicly thank you
Thank you for your comments. It's great to hear that. Do we have any other speakers in the audience? Seeing none, Brian do we have any speakers via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands on Zoom.
Public Comment
1:14 – 1:193 turns
Yeah, thank you Mayor. I appreciate the opportunity to answer this. So yeah so with the city...I mean it goes back some time where the city started focusing on financial stability as part of one of the City Council's goals and this is part of a longer effort towards cost recovery and it included things like updating our master fee schedules and our rentals As we were looking at other things in the city where the city wasn't fully recouping what it cost to offer the service, we had two assessment districts. One of them is the construction of the Winter Berm and the other one is the City's landscaping maintenance district, again just part of an overall strategy for the city to just recoup what it costs to offer something. So when these two districts were set back up sometime in the 90s they covered the cost of what it costs to provide this service and this was a partnership between the city and the community like with the Winter Berm, it was the owners there on the beach or nearby The shoreline, there used to be lots of flooding and I've heard numbers of stories and so the city didn't have money back then to construct that.
And so the community with the city came together and formed this assessment district to be able to collect money from the property owners to assist the city in constructing The Berms, similarly with the Landscape Maintenance District. It was something where we came together and set this assessment district so that the City could collect money and maintain those spaces. And so that's just a very brief summary overview of what the assessment districts are now.
The process that we're currently going through is a Prop 218 process, and that I'll probably have to at some point in time have Jenna step in here and explain that a little bit more in depth because that's a legal process. Maybe I'll just save them my fumbling and let you go through it first.
Great thank you Michael. Council members to the Mayor I did also want to comment on one of the things that Michael referenced was, you know, there are two different assessment districts that are up for vote currently. So it's Landscape and Maintenance Assessment District and then also the Beach Berm Assessment District. So in terms of just large scale how municipalities can fund their services. There are various ways and it's anything from adopting general taxes, property taxes, sales taxes etc., to you know in terms of a spectrum where there's less proportionality that you have to propose or prove for taxes all the way to assessment districts where they're very proportional so in terms of You know being equitable and only assessing properties that are benefiting from these specific services Assessments or assessment districts are the most proportional tool that the city can use and that's because In the process, and this gets to the 2018, the Prop 218 process that Michael was referencing.
The city had to go through work with consultants to develop and draft something called an engineer's report. And this engineer's report actually goes through the city on a parcel by parcel basis and applies a certain amount of benefit for each parcel, for each of the two separate assessment districts. So let's take the Beach Berm for example right? The Beach Berm looks at you know they can start looking at the whole city but the entire city is not benefited by the Beach Berm.
The Beach Berm benefits a subset of properties within the beach neighborhood and so within that subset they actually use different equations and different analyses to identify exactly how much each parcel benefits from this beach berm. And so that's why it is considered one of the more kind of equitable tools to use in order to fund specific services. So with that in mind, you know, this is all work that's been happening behind the scenes, right? Is doing these analyses, drafting these engineer reports engineers reports, working with these consultants who are experts in this area. And then from there we have to post that data make it available for I believe it's 45 days at least 45 days ahead of when the ballots are due and then send all of the ballots out and give everyone an opportunity to vote and say yes or no.
Is there anything else you wanted me to talk about?
1:19 – 1:242 turns
So one of the places we have this is on the, and I'll answer, circle back to those questions but we have fact sheets for both of the assessment districts. We have a video presentation that people can watch and it's on our website CarpinteriaCA.gov forward slash assessment districts for even more details but to get into the question so will it increase? The proposed assessment district is designed to increase It can increase by a minimum of 3% to a maximum of 6%, based on CPI-EU, Consumer Price Index for urban. I think they use urban workers and it's not automatic. It doesn't have to be but one of the biggest complaints that We've, or concerns that we've actually received as we've been going through this process was the jump that happened because the city had not increased the rates since the 90s.
So had it been increased every year might have been a dollar It is not a one-time fee. Again, there is a potential for an annual increase. If there was an economic downturn or another pandemic I would imagine The city may choose not to do that. But aside from that, to not have that major impact? I know I would expect it most likely would. I've heard some other comments and I'll kind of tag on because I've also been seeing things on social media and whatnot It was about the, you know, why wouldn't the city go through this process? Like why wouldn't we just go through it every year instead of building in the increase or, you know, why don't we do it every few years and I just want to let folks know those engineers reports.
The legal time into preparing the ballots, the informational materials and such are well over hundreds of thousands of dollars to go through this process. And so it would not be a good idea for the city to look to do this on an annual basis or even every few years. This is something that ideally you put in place and you build so that it continues just to cover the cost.
of the service being provided. The other question, so how long will it go on? It doesn't have a sunset date so we'll continue to go on and just cover what it costs to offer the service Another question that I've heard is about, will it cover the streets? And they've heard some comments that it was misleading because there was a picture of, I think, a street in one of the fact sheets. And so it actually does. Well, I should say no, it doesn't cover the cost of just paving random streets but it does cover the costs of repairing street sidewalks and gutters for any that are damaged by the more than 3,000 street trees that are in the city So it does do repair. And then very indirectly, so the city's general fund is currently subsidizing this district to the tune of about $900,000 or so.
So if the district was collecting what it costs to offer the service, that's $900,000 that would remain in the general fund for your council to direct how you see fit which could be to pavement. So very indirectly, it could also assist pavement in that way. Another thing is some people who are receiving this and they see public commenter mentioned $165. Some people believe that this is a new fee that they would have to pay But everybody that's a property owner is already paying the fee that was set back in 1996. And so when you see this new fee, what you will actually pay is the difference between whatever your assessment was, say $40 in 1996 and $165 now. So it's nothing new. It's just the amount is getting updated from 1996 cost to 2026.
And then I think I heard just towards the very end why the burden on property owners and I think Jenna kind of touched on that with this Prop 218 process. It is tied to property owners, some folks early on were very interested in taking part, but they don't own. Maybe they rent or live here, but because the benefit is to the property owners themselves, the Prop 218 process requires that this just be a voting ballot for property owners. So there's a lot there and I would encourage people to go online cause there's multiple fact sheets and videos there because it is a very, very detailed process.
And if there's anything I left out or was confusing happy to try to clarify
If I could just ask like, just a couple of clarifying questions because I think it's helpful to get that high-level response but I think what the public may be their confusion about are maybe some simpler types of questions. So for example if people don't vote for this assessment increase what will happen?
1:24 – 1:3010 turns
Vice Mayor Solorzano, through the mayor. Thank you it's a great question so that's actually one of the things on the fact sheet and I wish I could pull it up and have it right in front of me but essentially if you vote to support it then the rates would be made to be what it cost to offer the services now. If you vote no, essentially what happens is the general fund continues to subsidize the landscape maintenance district since it can't cover itself and those are funds that don't go back into the general fund for other programs or services that the city may be interested in offering Right, and you would continue to pay the 1996 amount that you already pay. That wouldn't go away. That was already approved.
You just wouldn't be covering the cost and so the general fund will continue to subsidize? So
basically money from the general fund that could be used for other programs that other people depend on or are interested in, age well, different things like that. That money currently is being funneled into Supporting the berm and the landscape maintenance that's going on in the city. And so with this assessment increase, that's hopefully going to prevent that money being taken out of the general fund so that that money can And the general fund can be used for the other priorities that the city and residents might have.
Vice Mayor Solorzano, through the mayor, I got excited and wanted to jump in but yes you're correct there and i think you also hit on a point that i was making earlier on the kind of equitableness right so those are general fund um those are those are just that's general fund monies that can be used for everything but instead If the assessment districts aren't funded by the property owners that are receiving the benefit for that, then that's everyone's money in this city that is going to subsidize those benefits into those properties. So your example or your statement really exemplified kind of that issue and I did also want to clarify so Michael did a great job of explaining What happens if there's a no vote on the assessment districts and the assessment districts do not pass, but if there is a yes vote and the assessment districts do pass then that amount that you've been paying since 1990 that gets taken off of your tax bill, right?
And fully replaced by this new amount. So you're not going to ever be paying both of those amounts at the same time.
Yeah and then just one more question then so then if it is not passed or versus if it is passed how what will residents see or not see depending on if it's passed or not when it comes to the landscape district for example
Vice Mayor Soller, Senator Thurgood-Mayor, are you talking about practically walking around town or on your tax bill? Yes. Practically walking around town. I will turn that over to Michael. Thank
you. Thank you again, Vice Mayor Soller and Senator Thurgood-Mayor. Your council would be put in that position where we would either decide to stop offering those services because we can no longer afford them—that covers over 3,000 street trees, it covers 184 Acres it covers multiple trails and so we would either continue to take care of those Because it's important and that those funds would not be available for the other programs and services that you mentioned And or where we would have to Reduce those services,
right? And then so that would be something that the public would see out and about town if we had to reduce those services That impacts things like tree trimming. Like what else what other examples did you know? I
Yeah, you know tree trimming repairing of sidewalks and streets damaged by trees which again all these things indirectly impact the city because if there's accidents or things related to these things those also come back to impact the city so they would see all of those things.
So hopefully I hope that that kind of maybe ties it in a little bit closer to what people at who are listening can understand because otherwise I know it can be very intimidating just to hear words like Cost recovery, master fee assessment district. But this is going to really potentially affect one way or another what our town looks like and what we see when we're walking through it. Thank you for the clarification
Yeah, thank you. And just I really thought Jenna made a good point which is just essentially the city's trying to cover what it costs to run things because otherwise the general taxpayer is subsidizing all of these things through the General Fund and it limits your guys' ability to offer them programs and services.
1:30 – 1:358 turns
I'd like to also point out to the public that when we were facing the challenges that we have with these assessments, we as a council decided that rather than making it a mandatory increase, that we made the decision available for the people. Actually, the community now has that decision to make. They're the ones that are going to vote. They will be the ones to make the decision ultimately on whether or not this is going to be going in that direction I think it's a good move that the council made, giving the decision-making process back to the people rather than for us making that decision.
How does the property owner see how much they're paying right now? Is that on the tax bill?
Yes Council Member Clark, that's correct. Thank you. We're also happy to resolve any issues we've found that we use the county's tax roll. And there's been a number of things where people have found things that were, you know, older from their county tax rolls and so the city has also been helping people to fix those things as well. If anyone sees anything, please have them come in. I've mentioned this before but our email which is the assessmentdistricts at CarpinteriaCA.gov is answered directly by our city manager and our program manager and have met and answered dozens of calls and met with people in the office and we're still doing that and happy to continue to do so.
Any other final questions thoughts? All right thank you for that summary that was really helpful We will now move on to planning commission actions.
Hello again Council. So the Planning Commission had their last meeting last Monday, February 2nd and they had two items on their agenda neither of which resulted in a final action being taken. The first item was a new single-family residence proposed for 333 Linden Avenue The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to continue this item to a future meeting with direction to the applicant to work with staff, to make adjustments to the site plan, to relocate the garage to the rear of the lot and to take vehicular access off of Dorrance Way either through an easement or a lot line adjustment with the adjacent property which is under same ownership.
And then also indicated their preference that the other elements of the site plan, in terms of setbacks and building footprints and those sorts of things shouldn't materially change from what was presented to them. So we'll be working with the applicant on that one to try to study some of those changes and bring that item back to a future commission meeting.
The second item before the Commission was a proposed wireless communications facility for Verizon Wireless. That was proposed for the rooftop of the building at 912 Linden Avenue, this is where Sushi Terry and Pacific Health Foods are located. And after hearing public comment, the planning commission voted 5-0 to continue that project until the April 6th Planning Commission meeting to allow time for the applicant to explore an alternative location for that facility at 941 Walnut Avenue which is the Carpinteria Veterans Hall with the property owner which in that case is the County of Santa Barbara and directed staff to help facilitate those conversations.
That concludes my Planning Commission action report unless you have any questions for me.
Thank you, we received an email from Patrick O'Connor today noting that on the agenda item tonight for the first project I guess it's Kohler He says that the memo or that description states, otherwise preserve the general site layout slash footprint of the proposed residence. And then he says however at the 14730 mark in the meeting chair Allen stated specifically that the motion should articulate the whole of the structure no closer to the street Can you explain the difference? I can't really get that. And then how is this going to be reflected in the minutes?
Through the Mayor, Council Member Clark... So I did include that clarification in my verbal presentation tonight At the hearing, several of the commissioners expressed interest in not seeing the site plan change in any material fashion. The setback from Linden Avenue being one of the items that was identified but not necessarily the only one and so that's why for the purposes of reporting out the summary and the action memo I left it a little bit more general But the minutes from the meeting will be more explicit and detailed, including all of the different kind of input that was provided from the commission in making the motion.
Thank you.
1:35 – 1:4214 turns
Nick, I've got another question on the second item that has to do with the Verizon wireless facility and their proposal for the locations currently. During that meeting time i understand through media that the county supervisor was also there making a suggestion that they would be approachable for alternative locations in the county and I'm bringing this up because It's an interesting concept. However, with the county not having jurisdiction technically within the city how is that going to be processed or how is that going to move forward with that?
Through the Mayor, Council Member Nomura. So in this case if Verizon and the county are able to reach some kind of an agreement to locate a wireless facility at the Veterans Hall, the county would be acting in the capacity of landlord and the city would still be responsible for acting in the capacity of land use authority so we would still be responsible for reviewing a conditional use permit application and our Planning Commission would still be the decision maker on that permit
Okay, thank you. The reason I brought that up does make the situation a little bit awkward when we have this kind of quote blindsiding us without having any I would say pre-warning of what the intent was going to be for the comments so I'd like to see County Supervisor actually come forward with ideas like this that we could actually hear of before the actual hearing of these items
Council Member Nomura, point taken. Allegedly Supervisor Lee was at the meeting for another purpose and happened to hear this item and then made some phone calls and worked his magic behind the scenes and came up with this alternative solution to present to the Commission and the applicant.
Sounds good. And I appreciate his action on this one, but again it makes it kind of catches us a little off guard on these things. We'd like to have it done prior to... Thank you.
Any other questions or comments? I have a question regarding the second item as well and what the Planning Commission voted on. So they voted to continue this project and look at it again April 6 so that they didn't necessarily say that what was proposed is not a good fit. They're just saying we're going to extend the time for Verizon to come up with some additional options
Mayor Alarcon, that's more or less correct. So we didn't really have the opportunity to get into deliberations on the merits of this particular proposal at this particular location. I think the writing was on the wall, right? That there was a number of members from the public who had concerns about this project and were concerned about this location And seeing that, and seeing that there was potentially a viable alternative site that might be less controversial and still meet Verizon's needs.
The Commission was happy to grant that additional time to Verizon to explore this option. I don't expect we'll have necessarily a fully cooked revised plan by April I think what's more likely is by April we'll have a better sense of whether this alternative location is something that looks like it can move forward or not. And if it does look like something that can move forward, then the applicant may request and the commission can consider giving Verizon some additional time to keep this current application sort of on the back burner while they continue down this path with the alternative location.
Great. Thank you. That was helpful. Yes?
Thanks. Did those commenters include downtown business owners?
Council Member Clark, yes there were representatives from Pacific Health Foods that commented on the proposal and I believe also the owner of the new restaurant proposed at the corner of Carpinteria Avenue in Linden was there to speak and I think he left before his name came up but I think he had intended to comment
Thank
you. This was actually reviewed, I believe 15-16 years ago by the ARB and at that time the intent of the design was actually to affix antennas onto the building rather than blending it in. These fixtures were actually going to be painted black so they were going to stand out pretty obtrusively and so that's why I'm thinking if it comes back, the guidance hopefully will include blending antennas if they are going to end up in the city right of ways.
Council Member Nomura, so we do work with the applicants on all these wireless projects to do our best to hide the facilities. In most cases that means they get integrated into either the existing architecture of the building or some kind of architectural feature like a chimney. In the case of this Verizon project for the proposed project on top of the Sushi Terry building It was a combination of effects, right? So on the Linden side they were looking at adding some ornamental attachments if you will to the clock tower element and blending in with the architecture and making it look like it was integral to that structure. And then on the back side, on the alley side there would have been a new kind of chimney-like structure added to the building to hide the antenna.
If Verizon ends up pursuing now the alternative location at the Vets Hall, they're looking at right now trying to locate the antennas inside the existing tower on the Vets Hall which is where there used to be a wireless facility way back when. If for some reason that's not viable then they might explore some other alternative design like what they call a mono flagpole where they would replace the existing flagpole with different flagpole that has a wireless facility inside of it. So there's different options out there, but the intent is to blend them in and not make them obviously visible.
Right from what I recall from that hearing also is the same thing. I believe it was Bud's exception at the time. The biggest concern was specifically that and the fact that at that time the actual clock tower was still working so it was kind of a feature within the city downtown entry area
1:42 – 1:4713 turns
Seeing no other questions, I will open up public comment. Mr. Rogelio Delgado, welcome.
Thank you. Two issues, number one, the Baylor project. I appreciate the effort of City Council, Baylor residents but the project I think it's a done deal. I said it last year and I was there with the school board.
Mr. Delgado, I'm so sorry to interrupt you. Yes? I want to ensure that this public comment is just for the items on the agenda for the Planning Commission. Just for what was shared. Oh, I see. It sounds as though maybe your comments may be better suited for general public comment.
Correct. Yeah.
Sorry. Perfect. Okay. I'll call you right back up. Thank you. Do we have any other public speakers in the audience for this item? Seeing none, I will turn to Brian. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no Zoom speakers. Okay.
I will go ahead and close public comment and thank you Nick for your presentation or your update. We will now move on to public comment on matters not on the agenda. So, I will welcome back Mr. Rogelio Delgado.
Thank you. Two issues number one, the Baylor Project. As far as I'm concerned, it's a done deal since 2018. A month ago, the school board mentioned it six times that the money is in the general fund. to pay for the settlements of the, for three men of the sex abuse of the 70s. Senior attorney Greg Price congratulated the district for settling for $4.2 million. So it's a done deal.
Also on 2024, the Board of Supervisors approved the project. And the Coastal Commission just approved it. It's a done deal. I appreciate everybody's effort, even mine effort. I mean, I've been fighting this for many years. You have seen it. Now, the city's assessments. Number one, I understand the need for the assessment. I support the assessment. I think it's going to pass but barely I have noticed that some people have not even opened the cedars later. I've seen it.
Some are not familiar with it. This is what I've seen. Yes, you have had meetings per district but it's saying like come to us. I think that it's you go to them, knock on doors. I've seen Mayor Alarcón, I've seen you on Facebook on the assessment both English and Spanish. That I mean that I think that everybody should do it. I think that people need to write letters to the Coastal View if they approve it, because actually the city's budget needs this assessment. Otherwise it is going to create problems and Passing this assessment will improve the budget. If not, personnel might be reduced. So let's all support this in any way that we can. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. I have no other speaker slips, do we have anyone else in the audience? Seeing none, I will look to you Brian, do we have anyone via Zoom? Mayor,
we have no Zoom speakers.
I will go ahead and close public comment. I'll leave it open if there's any follow-up questions from Council. Seeing none, okay. We will now move on to the consent calendar and I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips for public comment. Do we have anyone via Zoom? Mayor
once again, no Zoom
speakers. Okay, I'll go ahead and close public comment and I'll bring it back to the council Questions, comments and or a motion?
1:47 – 1:556 turns
I move to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held January 26, 2026. To receive and file the warrant register for the period of January 19 through January 30, 2026 pursuant to the Carpinteria Municipal Code Section 2.08.150F. To adopt Ordinance No. 795 Repealing and Replacing Chapter 10 .60, which is bicycles of the Carpinteria Municipal Code entitled Bicycles and Electric Mobility Devices.
And to issue a letter of public convenience or necessity to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for a Type 48 on-sale general public premises license for CHT LLC and Bainbridge Rising LLC, which is DBA Arnie's Rooftop Bar. at 778 Linden Avenue, Unit 8.
Second.
We have a first and a second. Roll call vote please.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
We will now move on to Administrative Matters item number 10 which is the 2025 Annual Integrated Pest Management Report
Good evening Madam Mayor, Council Members. This will be a co-presentation between Public Works Manager Ryan Airely and myself. So what is before you is the annual 2025, excuse me, the 2025 Annual Integrated Pest Management Report. So every year Or the ensuing year, the annual pest management report is reported to your city council. And this is no different. This is the next or this is the year that we report on last years so it's usually after the calendar year. So this doesn't really follow a fiscal year.
So this is more of a calendar year reporting. Just to give you a brief background again, because this comes to more on an annual basis is what this particular matter is about so back in January 9th 2012 the City Council adopted resolution number 5355 Establishing an integrated pest management policy and here on when we present to you, we'll just shorten it as IPM. So the IPM policy was intended to manage the environmental pests by reducing or eliminating the use of pesticides Within city facilities, that includes improvements like for example parkways and medians in addition to our city properties such as parks. As well as here is our City Hall campus.
establish ten tenants that is required to be followed. So these tenants are basically our rules of the policy, and in your staff report it's shown verbatim with the policy of these tenants So as part of the tenants, one is to establish the IPM. advisory committee. So prior to city staff presenting this report, the agenda or excuse me, the IPM report or the draft of it was sent to the IPM Advisory Committee and the IPM Advisory Committee basically had no exception that accepted and recommended for this particular report to the City Council for approval And I'm going to switch the microphone over to our Public Works Manager who's going to talk more about the particular pesticides, herbicides and whatnot. What had a particular best practices or tactics that we call in the IPM report Provide you a little bit more information on just my introduction and our Polar X manager Ryan early will Do the presentation and walk you through the IPM report?
Because there's a lot of that. You've seen it's pretty thick and There's a lot of particular chemicals That if you have any questions about that Mike Ryan early, we'll be able to address that so with that Ryan
Good evening council The City of Carpinteria utilizes herbicides to manage weeds and invasive plants in our right-of-way, some of our parks and the open space areas. The city also uses pesticides for insect and rodent management For rodent or for insects, I'm sorry such as California oak moths aphids ants and spiders the city uses insecticides injections traps and sprays.
For rodents the city uses traps and carbon dioxide gas application and we have provided all the safety data sheets for all of the chemicals in the IPM. We did inadvertently leave out two SDS sheets but we have since put those in the IPN therefore A chemical is used to manage California oak moths. One is a boxer, which is a trunk injection and the other is ampedes, which is a spray for the canopies.
The city has identified several pest management free zones, which include El Caro Park, Franklin Creek Park, Heath Ranch Park, Memorial Park and Monte Vista Park. These areas are completely pest management free. All weeds are removed mechanically and by hand, and no chemicals are used. So kind of a broad general way to look at it is for the locations where pest management applications are used The pest management free zones are delineated as play structures or picnic areas.
These areas are all completely pesticide and herbicide-free, again everything is pulled manually and the contractors are trained to know not to use any chemical means in those locations. And while it's very rare on occasion fields do have to be sprayed for herbicides and as well as you know using pesticide measures If a field does have to be sprayed, they are caution taped off and signs are posted warning of the chemical treatment 48 hours in advance of the treatment. And they're left closed for 24 hours after the treatment.
And lastly, the city does not employ a qualified applicator but our contractors Showscapes and Santa Barbara Pest Control employ professionals that are trained in the usage and the application of pesticides and herbicides.
1:55 – 2:0014 turns
Thank you, Ryan. And with that, that concludes our report pending questions. Thank you.
Thank you. Questions?
Yeah, thank you. A couple questions for you Ryan. You're doing a great job by the way but there are some concerns that I've still seen we have to be very cautious. We are doing this usually on public property so the first question i have is since these are subcontracted most of the applications we don't have the spray equipment nor do we have the manpower to even handle that portion of it Do we get a record of how much of each material is being used specific and the locations?
Yeah, we do. Every month our contractors have to provide to us the chemicals used and the amount of chemicals used and where they were used. And that's submitted to the Ag Department as well as to us.
And are those actually posted on property sites?
That I would have to follow up with you about.
That was one of the requests I had previously, especially if we're using some semi-toxic materials. I think that would be something that the public should be aware of, especially in the parks areas because we have the younger children. So I'd like to see that even it's not required, it's recommended. I would like to see on public places, especially in parks, that we actually do post those 24 hours in advance of the application.
Council Member Numeria, through the Mayor that we can implement that as well.
Sounds good. The other concern I have is the rodenticides. Currently we are still using traps with baits included in that. I think generally speaking the effective practice is to reduce the actual rodent or animal entering it, so they're trying to do what's called non-invasive invasiveness and actually put in half inch wire to keep them from actually entering into premises specifically. Do you know if the properties that we are maintaining within the city have been certified as being I would say non invasive for rodents?
Councilman Ramirez through the mayor. If I understand the question correctly, we have not implemented any of the wire mesh. We've been for the most part having the contractor proceed through with carbon dioxide gas and that's really the extent we haven't even i don't to my knowledge we haven't even used traps it's all been gas um does that answer your question or did i miss the mark
on i have seen some uh traps with baits out there um on some of the city properties i don' know if that's been there for a while or not they're the plastic black boxes you see uh the problem with those is that those have baits in it and the baits could actually be transmitted or transferred from quote, predatory animals. So for example if a rat or a mouse gets sick and they leave it they could actually even be I would say consumed by local domestic cats dogs things like that that could be extremely harmful if not deadly Knowing that, I think it would be in the best interest of the city to actually create these non-entry areas where we would be able to actually have that certified. Buildings for example City Hall have somebody come in and inspect it any holes that are larger than a half inch to be screened and removed that way we could have it quote closed off.
That would then eliminate the need or requirement to have these baits put out there that could be harmful for the environment
Councilman Romero, through the Mayor. We have spoken with Santa Barbara Pest Control who is the contractor that does most of our facilities pest control and we've brought up having them do inspections at all of our sites to verify entry points in ways that we can kind of tighten everything up and like you said prevent the rodent issues and we will likely be going forward with that in the future
I'd like to see us actually take the lead on that because that is a major problem in every municipality by putting the city up there first as an example of how this is done. Most organizations, most companies that do pesticides do not have anybody certified on their staff to do this because it's a brand new practice so maybe we may have to go beyond that. There's about only four or five that do it within the state of California so you may want to look into those to assist. Some will do it for free on a consultation Sure.
Thank you, those are my comments.
Thank you. I'd like to concur with Councilmember Wade's comment regarding the public signage. That was actually how we got to have an IPM program in the first place was a contractor applied a pesticide and some people walked in as very public area and were exposed And there were complaints. And so that's why we developed the IPM. So, that's a really important thing to do.
Thank you.
2:00 – 2:0513 turns
Any other questions? So this is not an area of expertise of mine, which is why I always appreciate hearing Councilmember Nomura's questions because they're so specific. So my questions are a little bit more simplistic in that how often does the policy committee or the members meet and then my other question is are there any Problem areas because I think I mean this comes annually. And so I think I've seen this report I don't know how much it's changed over the years, so I'm just curious also curious about New kind of strategies or tactics that we're using in the city and if there's any big challenges that we should be aware of
Madam Mayor, I could respond to the first question regarding frequency with the IPM Advisory Committee or the Integrated Press Management Advisory Committee. That is as a needed basis it's not a regular scheduled meeting but for this particular matter this was brought to them firsthand before went to your council Other times, I don't recall other times where we would call for them for their advice. But I do know it's this one and there were some inconsistencies before or even during my earlier time as a city staff member where the IPM Advisory Committee was not meeting for whatever reason but now since the IPM reporting is now with the Public Works Department Getting back on track of what is required in the tenants to go in front of the IP advisory committee basically as much as possible, especially when it comes to any Any new product, chemical product or even some tactic we go to them first for advice before the implementation.
But for this matter this was definitely brought to their attention before it came to you so I didn't jot down the other questions.
Are there any specific challenge areas?
Ryan is any specific challenge areas?
Madam Mayor, yes. As far as gophers and rodent issues we have the Vetzall Courtyard has been kind of a problematic area since I started six months ago and Viola Field as well. It's safe to say that every park has had some sort of gopher problem at some point and we treat them as they come up And then I believe my other question was, are we staying up to date with any new strategies or tactics to resolve some of these issues?
Yeah, through our contractors specifically Showscapes they're very good about having frequent meetings with myself and with Jeanette Gantt the Parks Director. Going over new methods of handling things. I think a lot of the, you know kind of to speak with what Wade had brought up, a lot of them are preventative now and several of them are still the same thing like having carbon dioxide gas or the herbicides that have been used for a long time but yeah they're very good about bringing things to our attention and kind of workshopping what we can do in the future.
Great thank you Any other questions, comments?
Real quick one more. Ryan's right about the gopher control carbon dioxide is the most humane way to use it and it also is the longest lasting believe it or not because once a hole has been used Prior to, if there's no signs of a well basically if the hole looks like it's been abandoned new gophers will come right straight into the same place. That's why you see it happening over and over again in the same locations. Carbon dioxide is one chemical that's actually gas that actually does prevent that from happening so I think that's a great way to go and again it's the most humane way
Thank you. Okay, seeing no other questions I will go ahead and open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We have no Zoom speakers.
Go ahead and close public comment. I'll bring it back to the council for any final questions comments and of course a motion.
I move to receive in file the 2025 annual integrated pest management report. Second.
Great, we have a first and a second all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Vote passes. We will now
move on to item number 11, which is the approval and adoption of Resolution No. 6434 establishing renter relocation assistance payment amounts for no-fault just cause evictions pursuant to Carpinteria Municipal Code CMC Chapter 7.04
2:06 – 2:1415 turns
Good evening, Mayor Ellicott and City Council. My name is Megan Mussoff I'm an assistant planner in the Community Development Department and tonight I'm giving the staff presentation for a proposed increase to the city's relocation assistance payments which are required when a tenant experiences a no-fault just cause eviction In September 2023, the council adopted Urgency Ordinance 770 which implemented regulations for just cause evictions.
One of the requirements includes that in the event of a no-fault just cause eviction, the property owner is required to pay the tenant relocation assistance. The ordinance set the required relocation assistance payment at one month's rent plus $1 or an amount to be established by City Council resolution. In February 2024, the Council adopted Resolution 6290 which set the payment at two months' rent or $6,500, whichever amount is more.
At the time of adoption this amount was decided based on average rental prices in Carpinteria and the relocation assistance payments required by other nearby jurisdictions. The resolution also directs the City to review this required payment amount on at least an annual basis, to ensure that it remains an effective tool for tenant protection and accurately reflects the realities of the rental market.
This year, staff recommends increasing Carpinteria's required minimum relocation assistance payment to $6,750. So a $250 increase. We looked at several factors when reviewing the amount and the first was inflation. From August 2024 to August 2025, the California Consumer Price Index for all items rose 3.3 percent and this index includes housing costs as well as the costs of goods and services associated with a residential move.
A three point three percent increase to the current $6,500 payment would be six thousand seven hundred and fifteen dollars however we are recommending a bit more of an increase to six thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars because state law allows rent to increase 5% plus the change in CPI, meaning that rental rates can increase faster than inflation. Another factor to consider is that Carpinteria is not an island of housing and jobs. We are situated within a larger sub-region of housing and jobs that includes the cities of Goleta and Santa Barbara and unincorporated areas of the South County.
If a person is evicted in Carpinteria, they may look for housing elsewhere in the South Coast region. Because of this it's important for the city to consider aligning its relocation assistance policies with nearby jurisdictions and the chart that I've provided here on the slide as well as in the staff report shows Goleta, Santa Barbara and the County of Santa Barbara's relocation assistance requirements for no-fault just cause evictions Carpinteria's existing $6,500 minimum payment is one of the lowest in the South Coast and so staff recommends an increase to more closely align with the County of Santa Barbara.
Staff also recommends a $250 increase this year for the purposes of making smaller increases to the required payment over time. If the City Council continues to implement relocation assistance as a tenant protection beyond what's required by state law, the payment amount will need to increase as well to remain effective as rental rates rise. Smaller increases on a more frequent basis may be less burdensome on property owners rather than large adjustments after many years.
And so for these reasons, staff's recommendation is to adopt Resolution 6434 which would establish renter relocation assistance payments for qualified tenants at two months' rent or $6,750 whichever amount is greater. And that concludes my staff presentation and we're happy to answer any questions. Thank you.
Thank you.
Any questions?
Yeah, just two quick questions. Has staff received any feedback from local landlords, I mean from when we first passed the original resolution leading up until now with this increase? Has there been any outreach from the landlords to city staff about this issue?
Vice Mayor Solorzano, that's a good question. We actually as city staff have not received much community feedback on this in the instances where I have interacted with members of the public Both landlords and tenants, you know come to us at the front counter asking questions It's often very amicable it's often property owners wanting to make sure that they're following the rules and so they want to make sure that they're doing it correctly And tenants are usually wondering, do I qualify for this? Am I exempt? You know what's the situation there so then we provide them with that information. But we have not received much negative feedback on our tenant protection policies.
That's really helpful to know and then somewhat related to what you just said. So how are tenants informed about their right to relocation assistance at the time of no-fault eviction?
Vice Mayor Solorzano, in Chapter 7.04 of our Municipal Code which includes all of our tenant and housing protections it is required that when a landlord wants to pursue a no-fault just cause eviction they have to provide a 60 day notice And in that notice, it must notify the tenant assuming that they are a qualified tenant. It informs them of their right to the relocation assistance payment and also the amount that they will be given and that amount has to be given to them within 15 days of the notice being served.
And through the mayor, if I may just to add Council Member Slarcino. This is also information that we share with the rental housing mediation program that the city contracts with to help provide tenant landlord mediation services and so if an affected tenant or landlord reaches out to rental housing mediation about pending Just Cause No-Fault eviction then our HMP discloses this information to the parties to make sure they're aware of it as well
God, I appreciate making that connection again for us to remind us that we do have that contract with that organization. Thank you. No, those are my two questions so thank you very much.
Any additional questions from Council? Yes.
Sorry, real quick. Question I have on one of the graphs you show it's a line graph it says that included the information from Santa Maria Santa Barbara is there a reason that was used and not just South County or is that the only chart that you could find?
Council member Nomura, that is a good question. A lot of the information collected by the census or provided by HUD housing and urban development is grouped into these larger metropolitan areas and so for the purposes of this because this graph provides information all the way back from the year 2000 to present That was the data set that I was able to pull from to show that amount of time.
So it's just more about the availability of data.
Thank you, because the table helps out quite a bit. Question I do have is Santa Barbara has none? I did not know that but they have nothing in place currently?
Council Member Nomura, they do require relocation assistance payments equal to two months rent at the time of notice of eviction. But they do not have a minimum amount so it would just be calculated based off of whatever the tenant's rent is.
Thank you
2:15 – 2:2712 turns
Any additional questions? Seeing none, I will go ahead and open up public comment. Do we have any... Mr. Delgado come on
up. Thank you. This is Useful figure, 6,750 for relocation when there's no place for an eviction. Now what are some of those examples when the renter is not at fault? We know that if they missed two, three rent payments that there's no defense against that. But what are examples of being not at fault? Because for example on condo complexes owner-renter ratio, it's like 60-40 or maybe even higher renters.
I mean, some of the examples could be a pretty good defense for a lot of people. A lot of people. And so that's one question that I have. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. Do we have anyone else in the audience? Seeing none, Brian do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands.
I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council for any additional comments, questions. And of course a motion.
I'll move to approve and adopt resolution number 6434 establishing renter relocation assistant payment amounts for no-fault just cause evictions at two months rent in effect at the time of an eviction notice or $6,750 whichever is greater pursuant to Carpinteria Municipal Code chapter 7.04. Second.
We have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Seeing none. And I'd like to just share with staff, I really appreciate this strategy or the fact that the council is continuing to look at this year after year. It demonstrates that it's on our radar. It's important for the council and I think Megan you kind of hit the nail on the head in terms of how This also supports landlords in that it's not one big drastic jump, but it's something that we're looking at year after year. So thank you for your work on this.
We will now
move on to item number 12 which is the continuation of public hearing for approval of the Measure A five-year local program projects for fiscal years 2026 through 2027 through 2030 to 2031.
Mayor just one
second
You know, I will actually we will take this opportunity and take a quick 10-minute break and we will resume great. Thank you
The City of Carpinteria is a city in the United States. The City Council meets with the Mayor of Carpinteria. Oh. The City of Carpinteria Oh, Moo.
2:29 – 2:4012 turns
Carpinteria City Council meeting tonight is February 9th, 2026 and we will resume with item number 12 which is the continuation of public hearing for approval for the Measure A five-year local program of projects for fiscal years 2026-2027 through 2030 to 2031.
So good evening Mayor, I'll take this item on behalf of the Public Works Department. Tonight's item is the adoption of the Measure A program of projects which is required to be at a noticed public hearing which is a requirement of Measure A. The public hearing notice for this matter was published in the Coastal View News on January 29th, however the program at projects is not ready for tonight so staff requests that the City Council open the public hearing receive any public comment and then keep the public hearing open and continue with the public hearing to February 23rd.
And that concludes my staff report
Do we have any questions from Council? Seeing none, I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom? Let's
see... We do not Mayor.
I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council. I assume you'll need a motion for us to carry this over or to open up the public hearing? That's correct,
Mayor. And then I think you just ended—although you said you closed public comment but we want to just make sure that you continue the public hearing to the 23rd which you'll do in your motion but I just wanted to make that
clear. Okay thank you for clarifying.
I move to continue the public hearing for approval of the Measure A five-year local program of projects for fiscal years 26, 27 through 2030 to 31 to the February 23rd 2026 council meeting.
Second.
We have a first and a second all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Okay motion passes We will now
move on to item number 13, which is second quarter code compliance report for fiscal year 2025 through 2026.
Good evening mayor, council members. Tonight I will be presenting the second quarter code compliance report for fiscal year 25-26. Staff recommendation is to receive and file. Kind of the same old, a little bit of the same old background. Code Compliance Division enforces local and state laws within the City of Carpinteria. Staff includes one code supervisor and one code compliance officer whose varied schedules generally provide coverage to the city seven days a week.
Figure 1 is contact information on how to get a hold of code compliance. And this is... A couple options here for you are through our service request portal, and that's the email address up top and our office lines and direct emails. Slide 3 shows the case load that was opened up for last quarter And we had 132 cases opened, and that's a decrease from last quarter of 171 cases. Of those 132 cases, it resulted in 92 violations In the violation, the action kind of how we work those cases.
We had it looks like I can read right here 288 action items so those would include inspections reinspections various reports opened follow-ups and notice a violation letters or other types of letters within those caseloads Slide number five here shows the total number of requests open for last quarter at 156. And up top, as usual, abandoned vehicles is our hot topic.
Those requests come by several different ways. Our online portal is the most popular, followed by a mobile app or a smart device app and good old-fashioned phone calls to our office. Slides 7 through 9. Because we closed out 2025, I thought I'd include some broader data points just to kind of show the difference between what we're doing for the whole 2025 and some 25-24 stats coming up.
So you can see that we have a majority of our caseloads dedicated to abandoned vehicles and followed. And these are, I'm sorry, these are requests that came in. The majority of the requests coming through were heavily focused on abandoned vehicles and noise complaints. And then other is kind of a hodgepodge of different stuff that's not quite identified. Our top three monthly trends are the abandoned vehicles, the noise requests and the other request. Kind of shows month by month where our number of quests that were coming in.
And total requests by volume throughout the year for 2025 we generally stay within the 40 to 60 requests per month range Let's see, slide I believe 10 here is again a breakdown of just showing nearly half of all our enforcement requests are vehicle related. Abandoned vehicle requests remain consistently high for over the year never really dropping below 12 cases a month and it peaked at 31 in August.
Noise complaints last year where you would think in the summertime we'd get the highest complaints, it was really kind of late fall or early fall into fall. And human encampment or encampment cases while those volumes are relatively low with 18 cases there was a high number of activity and late summer in one concentrated area Just to give you some idea, the caseloads for 2024 were slightly higher. I believe they were like 624 cases for 2024 and we were just under 600 for 2025 but we saw an increase in a much broader scale of code enforcement cases so maybe they were bigger You know, short-term rental cases that took a little more time and zoning cases that may have take us away from the field in doing various work related to the zoning cases.
This slide shows, again, year over year. As you can see parking continues to increase. We did see the zoning cases again back to the last slide. That's probably why those caseloads Numbers were slightly dipped for 2025. We took in more robust cases, and animal violations were down but animal control services were up which includes adoptions and intakes of animals which taxes staff.
Graffiti was down a little bit this year which was nice to see Let's see, this slide just represents trends over the year 2024 to 2025. And showing like I said a slight decrease in cases opened and a slight decrease in total cases closed, but overall wasn't huge. We were pretty stable and being able to button up the case load with maybe like I said some of them larger cases like short-term rentals and stuff still kind of ongoing It looks like the Parking is an increase, and animal control services were the main. And the zoning as noted in the past slides are the ones that were a significant increase.
And graffiti we saw a slight decrease. Our parking citations, we end up having 500 and let me see. 528 citations issued for that this quarter last quarter with our most going out to the 72 hour violations registration tickets and no parking areas which are red zones or maybe the parking next to a crosswalk that kind of stuff And our animal control information here. Again, we saw a decrease in violations and an increase in services. Again, this could be protective custody cases, welfare checks, animal impounds, and bite reports.
And that includes my presentation. And I'm happy to take any questions.
2:40 – 2:5331 turns
Thank you. Any questions? Yes.
Thank you. I'm just curious, what are some examples of zoning sign regulation violations?
Yes Councilmember Clark those would be seem to be focused we had a lot of new businesses open recently and so a lot of it was educating the business owners about sign placement in the right-of-way and stuff like that
Saw in the staff report you mentioned that there's a new service provider that you're using to collect fees and there was an increase In the amount of fees collected is how does that compare to previous up to before when you were using that new service provider?
Yeah, so we've kind of switched gears and this new provider is You know Doing I should say Working through our GoGov app, which is how we create our cases. We can then link our citation process through there and this new company can pull that data and if a certain amount of time passes then they jump on board and take over their end of it. So whereas in the past staff would have to do a lot of work to maybe facilitate all that connection in between collecting fines and stuff like this. And it's a little more hands-off and in the background for us now,
so... That's good to hear yeah I thought that was nice to read that. And then I was gonna ask this but you kind of answered it already about um I saw the staff report said that there are fewer cases but they were more complex ones that you're dealing with? It sounds like some of those are short term rental follow ups and then maybe some of the animal control cases or would that be right?
Correct. Yeah, we saw an increase in zoning violations over in that quarter and so sometimes we can wrap them up you know just get them in the process sometimes it's a more complicated case and so We have to take more time with it And so we don't close those cases, and we spend more time on animal services again. Instead of just going out and maybe contacting for off-leash and educating as may have been... An example where we had to step in and maybe check on an animal's welfare, and that takes time because we want to do follow ups and stuff like that and make sure that the animal is safe.
Great. Thank you very much.
Any additional questions from Council? Seeing none, I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no Zoom speakers.
I'll go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council for any final comments, questions, and of course a motion.
I move to receive and file the second quarter code compliance report for fiscal year 2025-26. Second.
We have a first and second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes, thank you. We will now
move on to item number 14 on our agenda which is the City Council Advisory Group Handbook Update.
Good evening again, Mayor and Council Members. So for tonight we've got an update to our City Council Advisory Group Handbook. One second... So a little bit of background here. The council approved the Council Advisory Group Handbook back in November of 2024 And with tonight's update, the handbook has been consolidated to be more concise and less repetitive. The handbook covers a city government overview, the membership and organizational requirements for each council advisory group, member eligibility and the appointment process, the roles and responsibilities of the advisory group members, conflicts of interest, meeting guidelines and procedures, and rules of conduct and decorum.
And then some of the other updates in here include... So I've got the section title, the description of the changes and then what page number it's found on. So under the City Organizational Chart section, the chart was amended to include that the Legal Services and Advisory Boards and Commissions branch out from the City Council Under the general qualifications section, there were a few things added such as generally the advisory group members must be residents and qualified electors such as being a U.S. citizen 18 years of age or older who reside within the city limits of Carpinteria and also remain a resident during the duration of their appointment.
Also, former council members must wait one year after expiration of their term of office before they may be appointed to serve on an advisory group. And appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in city government. And lastly all members have to be in good standing with the City such as having fines and fees paid. And then onto the next slide...
Under the appointment of city employee relatives section, there was an addition of parent or step parent which was added to the definition of relative. And then under the resignation section, members who are unable or unwilling to continue their service due to health, business, personal obligations, or extended travel should submit a written letter of resignation to the staff liaison and the city clerk's office.
Which letters should be directed to the City Council and state the effective date of the resignation? And then a member who relocates their residence outside this city shall immediately notify the city clerk's office and resign from the advisory group. In the last section, CAG member roles, responsibilities and expectations. A few changes here are if a member must step down from an item due to a conflict of interest they must notify their staff liaison as far in advance as possible to ensure that a quorum for the meeting is there If a member fails for any reason to attend two consecutive regular meetings without advance notice to the staff liaison, their position shall be deemed vacant and their term terminated.
Leaves of absence are not granted to members except under unusual circumstances and when authorized in advance by the City Council. And lastly, members have a responsibility to ensure that they do not use personal social media accounts to conduct or represent City business including posting, captioning, or responding to public comments. And with that, that concludes my presentation and happy to answer any questions.
Any questions from Council?
Sure, I really appreciate these updates. I think they provided some clarity and the handbook in general is such a good resource so thank you for working on all of that. Just a couple questions. So in terms of the attendance pattern section of it, how would council be notified if a member of a board had some attendance issues?
So we'd first start with the staff liaison of their respective board or committee. And so I think we'd have to instruct staff liaisons to let me know if, for a chance, a member's unexcused absence of at least one, then I can kind of start noting that individual and make sure that they don't reach their second. And if they do, then, of course, we'll have the termination proceedings.
And does that happen, would we be informed like via during a meeting or prior to a meeting or how would that process work? It could be
during the meetings such as through the City Manager's report.
Okay
got it
perfect thank you I appreciate having more detail about that. Or an email too. Or email okay either way good. And then this is, are there plans for periodic refreshers or... Because I know that we do have some turnover sometimes with the councils and advisory boards. And this is such good information that I think it can be for people, not just new people but people who have been serving on these for a really long time, I think it'd be really good to make sure that they are aware of it. So are there plans going forward for doing that?
I think what we could do in the future, because every two years when the Council makes the appointments to all the council advisory groups not far after that process happens usually the City Attorney's Office holds an in-person ethics training here in the chambers and maybe as part of that we could also add a section on covering the handbook.
I think that'd be a really good way to just kind of not, hopefully not add too much time to that but just to keep that awareness with the participants.
And Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor yes we can definitely add that on to our AB 1234 training but the CAG handbook itself is meant to be You know, given to every new member. Given to every member of a CAG every few years and then signed by them and actually returned to the city so that there's a mutual understanding of what expectations are.
I think this whole process is really helping with that. And then my last question is, and this is not one of the updates but it's part of the handbook, there's a section about individuals serving on multiple council advisory groups and it says City Council strongly discourages individuals from sitting on multiple council advisory groups to allow all interested individuals to have a chance to serve. And I was wondering, how can we monitor this more? Because I know that we've been doing a really big push to get new faces and new voices onto some of these boards.
And I just wanted to kind of underscore that piece and see what some thoughts might be about how we can honor that part of the handbook.
Certainly, certainly. So one thing I could suggest and I believe it happened at the last appointment process in 2024, sorry is that when the council makes the appointments or before they make the official appointments Of all the applications that staff has received, we explicitly note that this person's applied for X, Y and Z committees. So they're applying for multiple so that your council is aware and not appoint someone to two or more boards or committees.
So maybe we just try to make that more of a best practice going forward because I know there is concern sometimes that not a lot of people necessarily apply for them but I do think maybe it's a chicken and egg thing too if people think, oh well these you know the same people are on this already and they're staying on it every year. It might discourage people from even considering applying.
Sure. Excuse me Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor and I apologize for interrupting Brian but what your comments made me think of and you know including this in the AB 1234 training and just your comments on AB 1234 The CAG handbook, we could have some slides put together so that every appointment process we have those 10 slides summarizing the CAG Handbook. So that appointees do understand what their roles and responsibilities, what their expectations are prior to accepting an appointment.
I think that's a great idea, and I appreciate that because I know that's one of our priorities is just to be as inclusive as possible and just encourage as many people as possible to serve on some of these boards. So I think this handbook is a really good way to do it, and then the follow-up you just suggested, Jenna, I think is going to really help out with that. So thank you very much, and thank you Brian for the presentation.
2:53 – 2:5818 turns
Yes, questions.
Thank you. In under the expectations the attendance what about Zoom? How's the zoom treated? Is that is are we talking about in-person attendance for the two consecutive missed meetings or
Council Member Clark, through the Mayor. I think it's just attendance generally as you're aware and the CAG handbook actually goes into this too about some of the teleconferencing or remote attendance options for attending a meeting those are changing every year so we will be updating those as they do change but as long as a member is attending and is able to vote as a member of the CAG that would be counted as attendance, but there are constraints about remote attendance. So you can only attend remotely for specific reasons and the Brown Act itself includes a limit on how many times an individual can attend remotely each year.
Thank you.
Any additional questions? Yes.
I think my question is building on what the Vice Mayor was saying. Because this is being updated mid-service time, will our current CAG members be alerted to these changes?
Yes, thank you for the question. Yes that's a simple answer. Once your council approves if you do so tonight then I will email all our Council Advisory Group members the updated handbook and note the changes that have been made. Thank you. Any other questions?
I have a question or maybe a point of clarification under the, I really appreciate the description of all of the advisory bodies. That's really helpful. I know to me for the library, I believe we updated the membership that currently states there's only five adults, but did we update membership to include 18? I
believe well, one thing I can think of offhand is the youth position.
So then I think that description might just need to be updated, so you know before you finalize it. And then just one comment or a comment is I really appreciate that we are providing these advisory members with their roles and responsibilities. I think this also allows the council to just get a little bit more of a grasp of who the members are and attendance. And then I think another point to note is It does also give us the ability to remove anyone if we needed to. Of course, the goal is always to... I mean at least my goal would be to not do that but that is something the council could do it if needed so I appreciate that piece being in here as well.
Mayor, if I could just add a few things. One is on page seven something that I didn't catch here in my first review is at the top the citizens of Carpinteria and would perhaps with your approval like to change that to residents of Carpinteria? Looking at council for... okay and then You know, also in terms of the leaves of absence it states now that will require authorization from your city council.
So we'll also do that similarly to the question that was asked earlier. I know sometimes we have folks that leave on vacation some longer than others and so we'll bring that to you all now. It looks like for prior authorization and then that can also be acted on immediately or when you're considering your next appointments Um, for that and then regarding some of the updates to the CAG handbook. We'll put it on a regular schedule but if there's anything ever that your council sees that may need to be addressed more immediately um, there's nothing to I think that prevents us from updating this You know, two weeks from now or something if we realize there was something really missed. So I just want to open that up and just say that if there's ever anything like that you know please let us know and otherwise we'll try to keep at a list of running things to update it each every couple years.
Great thank you yes
A quick question on this also. I didn't see it in here, but I assume this is in place, but term limits for the chairs of these committees? Is that included in there someplace?
I believe it is because usually...
I didn't see it, that's why I was asking.
Usually every, I think year should change or no, I'm sorry every two years when Council makes new appointments then a new vice chair and chair should be elected amongst each CAG.
Okay
okay
2:58 – 3:2125 turns
So just as Councilman Moore has a point of clarification. So every time there's new appointees, then the committee does have to vote to select a new chair and vice-chair but it doesn't necessarily prevent them from selecting the same chair or vice-chair if that was something that your council wanted to see as a change. Understood.
Okay, I was just curious about that because I had assumed that it was actually going to have term limits. Good with that?
We can ask a follow-up question. Council Member Nomura, did you mean you're interested in pursuing term limits for CAG members?
No not at all um I brought that up because in the past when I served as on the architecture review board did that for almost 18 years I think was appointed chair for like 12 of those so not that I wanted to do it uh I was just curious if they were going to put term limits on it um I think it's okay though with the changes that usually occur
I
mean,
just you bringing up the idea of that. I might be interested in maybe in the future not now but looking at what may be term limits for some of the CAG, not for council but for the CAG boards and committees. And I mean this would not be for this iteration of the handbook but what Council Member Nomura said was interesting again in the idea of encouraging I will open up public comment. Do you not have any speaker slips? Do we have anyone via Zoom?
I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council for any final questions, comments, and of course a motion.
I'll move to approve the updated City Council Advisory Group Handbook including the edits that were mentioned during our discussion.
Second.
We have a first and second. All those in favor?
Aye. Quick clarification we should probably state with those
Yeah, okay. So if I could go back to the motion so including updating the Library Advisory Commission's membership number and then also the mention of this word citizen replace that with resident of Carpinteria like Michael had mentioned and then...
He probably has a note right there. Brian
anything else
we missed? No, I don't
think so. Those are the two that I remembered. So I'll fold those into the
motion. And I will accept the modified motion.
We have a first and second on the modified motion. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Any legislative update? None this evening Mayor Alarcon. Great, thank you. Any committee reports inquiries and other matters presented by council members? Okay seeing none Attendance of council members for future meetings Yes Looks like everyone will be present and we will now
move on to item number 15 which is conference with legal counseling anticipated litigation
Thank You Mayor Olicone, you are correct. We will be adjoining into closed session for significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph 2 of subdivision D of section 54956.9
for one case. Great thank you I will now open up public comment on the closed session matter. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor we have no zoom speakers
I will go ahead and close public comment, and we will now temporarily adjourn to closed session at 8.32pm. The City of Carpinteria is a city
in the United States. The City of Carpinteria The City of Carpinteria is a city in the United States. The City of Carpinteria The City Council meeting is being recorded.
3:22 – 3:225 turns
The City Council meeting.
Hello all and welcome back to the February 9th, 2026 City Council meeting. It is 851 and we are reconvening in open session. May I ask for a closed session report?
Yes thank you Mayor Alarcon there's no reportable action tonight.
Thank you it is now 851 still and we will officially adjourn the meeting thank you
♪♪