BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 February 23, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:0518 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:07

The City of Carpinteria is a city in the United States. Good evening and welcome to the Carpinteria City Council meeting. Today is Monday, February 23rd 2026 and we will begin with a roll call.

Roll call, called by City Clerk
Show transcript
Vice Mayor Solorzano? Here. Council Member Clark? Here. Council Member Mayer? Here. Council Member Nomura? Here And Mayor Elicon? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:01

I will now ask if you are willing and able please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

And we will begin our meeting this evening with introductions, proclamations and presentations. Our first one is a proclamation designating the month of March 2026 as Women's History Month in the City of Carpinteria. I'd like to now open up public comment for this item. Seeing no speaker slips, I will ask Brian if we have anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:52

Mayor, we have no Zoom speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54

Now we'll bring it back to the council for any questions or comments and of course a motion.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:59

I'll move that City of Carpinteria adopt the proclamation designating the month of March 2026 as Women's History Month. Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:09

We have a first and a second, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Seeing none, the proclamation has passed and we will read the proclamation and we will begin with Council Member Mayer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21

Whereas March is nationally recognized as

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:24

Women's History Month and whereas the national theme for Women's History Month 2026 is Leading the Change, Women Shaping a Sustainable Future. This theme honors the women who have and are reimagining and rebuilding systems to ensure long-term sustainability in creating a future that is rooted in equity justice and opportunity for all and addresses today's most urgent challenges and laying the foundation for a more resilient and inclusive tomorrow and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:51

Whereas we recognize March 8th as International Women's Day, a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:03

Whereas women of every race, class and ethnic background have made historic contributions to our nation and our community in countless recorded and unrecorded ways. And

CommentUnited StatesProposed4:15

whereas women have played and continue to play critical economic cultural and social roles in every sphere of life by constituting a significant portion of the labor force working inside and outside of the home and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:30

Whereas women have also played a unique role throughout history by providing the majority of the volunteer labor force of the

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:37

city and. Whereas women were particularly important in the establishment of early charitable, philanthropic and cultural institutions in our cities and.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:47

Whereas women of every race class and ethnic background served as early leaders in the forefront of every major progressive social change movement and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:59

Whereas women have served our country courageously in the military,

CommentUnited StatesProposed5:03

and... Whereas women have been leaders not only in securing our own rights of suffrage and equal opportunity but also in the abolitionist emancipation, labor, civil rights and other movements including the Me Too and the Equal Rights Amendment efforts. And... Whereas

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:24

despite these contributions, the role of women in history has often been overlooked and undervalued.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:30

Now therefore, the City Council of the City of Carpinteria does hereby recognize and honor Women's History Month 2026 embracing the theme Leading the Change. Women shaping a sustainable future and acknowledging that women are at the forefront of driving holistic change. And with that I'd like to request Beth Cox to share a few words before we provide you with the proclamation.

0:05 – 0:1121 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:59

Good evening. Thank you so much on behalf of Women Making Change here in Carpinteria that was established in 2020, I'd just like to say thank you along with many women here who are so excited. March is Women Making Change and Women's History Month. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:17

Thank you and we'd love for you and anyone else to take a photo with us in the front.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:28

You can stand up in the back

CommentUnited StatesProposed6:29

if there's two waiting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:36

All right, everybody looking here, smiling historic.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

The next item on our agenda is resolution number 6436 in support of long-distance living heritage trails and commemorating the 250th anniversary of the Juan Bautista de Anza Expedition encampment near Carpinteria on February 24, 1776. I'd like to open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role7:49

Mayor, we have no Zoom speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:50

I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council for any comments or a motion.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role7:57

I move that the city adopt the resolution in support of long-distance living heritage trails, and commemorating the 250th anniversary of the Juan Batista de Anza Expedition encampment near Carpinteria.

CommentUnited StatesProposed8:08

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:09

We have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Seeing none, the resolution passes unanimously and we will now read the resolution. And we will begin with Councilmember Mayer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:23

Whereas the City of Carpinteria's unique geography, situated between the Pacific Ocean and the coastal mountain range has for thousands of years served as a place of travel gathering and sustenance forming part of an interconnected network of routes shaped by indigenous peoples long before European arrival and

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role8:42

Whereas historic travel routes throughout Carpinteria are more than physical pathways through the landscape, they are living heritage corridors that connect past and present and provide opportunities to preserve cultural memory, promote respectful and sustainable recreation, and strengthen community understanding and belonging.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed9:00

Whereas the Carpinteria City Council Strategic Plan establishes goals to enhance existing and explore new recreational, educational and community engagement opportunities that support a connected inclusive and vibrant community rooted in a shared understanding of place and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed9:20

Whereas on February 24, 1776 Juan Batista de Anza led an expedition of approximately 240 men women and children northward towards the San Francisco Bay Area and camped near present-day Rincon Point at a site known to the expedition as La Rinclonada in proximity to the established Chumash village of Mesopshno Within an area of the expedition referred to as La Carpinteria and...

CommentUnited StatesProposed9:52

Whereas expedition diarist Father Pedro Font recorded descriptions of the coastal landscape, marine life, and encounters with the Chumash people whose craftsmanship maritime knowledge and social organization reflected a deeply rooted in thriving culture. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed10:09

Whereas a network of trails within the City of Carpinteria coincides with the Juan Batista de Anza National Historic Trail, as designated by the National Park Service linking the city to a broader regional and national framework of historic

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role10:24

and cultural interpretation. And whereas the 250th anniversary of the Anza Expeditions encampment in the Carpinteria area presents an opportunity to acknowledge the region's layered histories including Spanish Mexican and American periods while also recognizing the profound and enduring impacts of colonial expansion on Indigenous communities, and affirming the importance of inclusive, accurate, and community-informed storytelling.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed10:49

Now therefore be it resolved as follows. Section 1, The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2, The Carpinteria City Council hereby affirms its commitment to public education, historic preservation, respectful recognition of indigenous histories and inclusive community engagement through its support of long-distance living heritage trails that pass through the city.

In Section 3, the City Council recognizes February 24th, 1776 as a significant moment in the region's history and encourages educational interpretive and collaborative efforts such as the Explore Carpinteria initiative that elevate awareness of Carpinteria's natural, cultural and historic heritage in partnership with indigenous communities and for the benefit of present and future generations.

Passed approved and adopted on this 23rd day of February 2026. With that I'd like to ask all look to the clerk in terms of who will be receiving this proclamation.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role11:53

Mayor that'll be Mr. Wilkinson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:54

Perfect. Mr. Wilkinson, welcome and I invite you to the podium to share a few words.

0:12 – 0:1815 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed12:02

Madam Mayor, City Council members and everyone here, I would like to express thanks for issuing a resolution that highlights the fact that the many pathways through our community are living heritage corridors that connect the past in the present and provide opportunities preserve cultural memory promote respectful and sustainable recreation, and strengthen our community and understanding and belonging. The story of the Anza Expedition is one of migration, and yesterday I joined 30 people on a walk from Rincon Beach County Park to Santa Claus Lane.

The five-mile hike gave us an opportunity to imagine the experience of the men women and children traveling through our community 250 years ago but also gave us an opportunity to think about our own stories of migrating to this community. Remarkably, portions of the route we followed would look familiar to those who traveled here in 1776. I encourage everyone to take two or three hours out of their life and walk from one end of Carpinteria to the other.

You will not regret it. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed13:10

Thank you, and we invite you to take a photo with us in the front.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed13:14

Thank you. One this way.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:16

We will now move on to our third agenda item which is a proclamation designated Sunday March 8th at 2026 as California Arbor Day in the city of Carpinteria. I would now, I will now open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom? Mayor we have no raised hands I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council for any comments, and of course a motion.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role14:42

I'll move to have the City Council adopt the proclamation designating Sunday March 8th 2026 as California Arbor Day. Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:51

We have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? None. The proclamation has passed unanimously and I will ask if Council Member Mayer can begin reading the proclamation for us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:05

Whereas in 1872, the first Arbor Day was observed in Nebraska as a special day set aside for the planting of trees and to recognize the importance of trees in

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role15:16

our daily lives. And whereas Saturday March 7th through Saturday March 14th 2026 have been designated as California Arbor Week. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:25

whereas Friday April 24th 2026 has been designated as National Arbor Day and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:32

Whereas the City of Carpinteria recognizes the importance of trees in our daily lives as a source of beauty and comfort in the community by improving neighborhood appearance, creating a better living environment, affecting the weather by providing shade, heat reflection and wind protection and improving air quality and contributing to energy conservation, and...

CommentUnited StatesProposed15:58

Whereas the City of Carpinteria has established numerous policies and regulations concerning the protection of trees including but not limited to Carpinterian Municipal Code 1228.080 Which established the Tree Advisory Board to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council, city manager, city staff and administration of the various provisions concerning street trees.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:23

Now therefore, the City Council of the city of Carpinteria does hereby designate Sunday March 8th 2026 as California Arbor Day in the city of Carpinteria and urges all citizens to recognize the importance of trees. And we'd like to present this proclamation to our Public Works Program Manager Ryan Ehrle. Welcome! Yes would you like to share a few words?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed16:52

I promised the Public Works Manager that he had no speaking role. So a promise is a promise Madam Mayor, Council Members. Thank you Public Works Manager Ryan Arrow will take the honor of accepting the proclamation At this time we don't have a special event like we usually have in the past for planting a tree However, though it's an armored day for the City of Carpinteria Arbor week. So we will be working with our tree advisory board to get ideas which by the way that Tree Advisory Board meeting is this Thursday at 5 30 p.m.. Here in City Hall at the side conference room, and it will be presenting The matter before them and will work to find a special event so that way we could broadcast that through our social media And our city newsletter on when that event will be thank you

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:56

Thank you. And we invite you to take a photo with us. And we will now

move on to item number four, which is the introduction of Kelly Dyer, Carpinteria Valley Water District General Manager. Welcome.

0:18 – 0:3313 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:53

Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members, City Manager and staff and everyone here. I'm honored, privileged and grateful to be a part of this community. I've started my role as General Manager at Carpinteria Valley Water District about one month ago and in that role I also serve as the Executive Director for the Groundwater Sustainability Agency But it's a very exciting time to be in this role.

We are working very hard on the Advanced Purification Project, which was awarded in January. So prior to... I don't really like to talk about myself very much but just so you know a little background about me. Prior to joining Carpinteria Valley Water District, I was the Assistant General Manager at Casitas Municipal Water District And my very last board meeting there was the award of the interconnection project, which will be connecting Casitas' system to the Carpinteria's water system. Which is a great regional project it's a bi-directional pipeline so water can flow both ways for emergency purposes and then prior to that I was the Water Supply Manager at the City of Santa Barbara I was there through the entire drought period for the desal reactivation, and I'm very familiar with the shared resources of the Kachuma project and the State Water Project.

So it just seemed like a natural fit for me to come to Carpinteria because I've worked on both neighboring sides within the region. Very excited to be here and look forward to working with your staff. I know the former General Manager Bob McDonald would give presentations periodically, so I'm happy to do that and will be available for questions at any time. Thank you!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:48

Thank you, Ms. Dyer. And I know I don't want to speak for my council and my colleagues but I know I would love to schedule a tour with the Water District. I think that would be really helpful and so I'll reach out and we'll see if other council members can also join in on the tour. Excellent! Any questions from council? Okay then welcome thank you thanks very much We will now

move on to item number five, which is the presentation by the U.S. Small Business Administration on the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program as a result of the December storms occurring December 16 through the 26th 2025 in Santa Barbara County.

PresenterMaurice FisherSmall Business Administration Office of Disaster Recovery and ResilienceProposedself-stated21:35

Hello everybody good to be here honorable mayor other VIPs as well. A lot of you may not know who I am and that's perfectly understandable because i've never been here before but here we go My name is Maurice Fisher. I'm a public affairs specialist with the Small Business Administration Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, and pretty much I'm like the Paul Revere for small business administration. What we do is we go to different locations where disasters have been declared, and we preach the good knowledge of small business interest loans, and I've got some brochures here that I'll leave with Mr. Barrett prior to leaving But just a couple quick notes. This is a reference to the late December storms that you had, December 16th through the 26th of...

I'm sorry, the late winter storms and This is an EIDL, which is Economic Injury Disaster Loan. It pertains mainly to businesses, local businesses and nonprofits as well. And the best way to get that word out is to speak with city council chambers of commerce mayors and very important dignitaries like that. With this we want to push the word out to the different business knowing that they can apply for up to $2 million loan. They don't have to get the $2 million. They can go just short of that or whatever their business needed No payment is due for the first 12 months. And with that being said, your payments will start once you receive your first disbursement from the government.

Once you get that, then you're good to go. You're rocking and rolling. You don't need to wait for your insurance to kick in before you apply. You can do this in conjunction with the small business loan. The best way for us to get this word out here is to meet with the City Council and Chairs of Commerce like I said earlier because we're not able to go door-to-door to different businesses and tell them about this and talk about that. Our best matter of communication is with you guys And again, I appreciate you guys having me out here.

I listened to a couple other speakers prior to me, the gentleman who said you can walk from one end of Carpinteria to the other The way my knees are set up, I don't think I can make that walk. But I appreciate the thought. A couple things that you'll need when you apply for this loan, when you apply for the loan, business as applied, you need an email address and a contact information for all applicants. If you are one of the applicants who has possession of that business like 20% or more, you also must fill out that application as well.

What you will need is your social security number, your employee ID number You need to provide financial income or financial information which results in the income and monthly expenses, and a complete and true copy. of the most recent federal income tax return, and this can be provided at a later time. Also for your information, insurance needs to be sent in too.

Now the best way there's not a center opened up near here but if you want to find out where there is a center, you can go to sba.gov forward slash disaster and once you go onto that website You'll see what the closest center is, and by I say center that means we can go in and they will assist you in filling out the paperwork. Get you scored away and on that road there. Also, you can also check the status of your application as well. And it's also phone number 1-800-659-2955. Now look at that as I read that because I'm pretty new. This is my rookie season with SBA.

Prior, I am no stranger to disaster. I served with the Texas Department of Public Safety for 30 years which is state police there in Texas and during that course of time I have seen my fair share of disasters. I know it is not an easy thing as you know that the more resilient the people are, the more things can get done. And since my time being here in California this is a beautiful place, a beautiful city and I appreciate being able to come out here and put forth that effort because to be of service is the greatest point for a mayor. So with that being said, I'll leave these with Mr. Barrett as well as a few business cards And again if there are no further questions, in and out. That's how I like it. In and out.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:43

Thank you for your presentation. I'll open it up to council members any questions? Doesn't look like it okay thank you. I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role25:55

Mayor we have no raised hands.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:56

Go ahead and close public comment. We will now move on to public information reports and announcements and we will hear from our first district supervisor. Hello, welcome

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed26:13

Daisy. Welcome Wade. Hi hello mayor Alarcon and the rest of the council so I have a couple updates for you tonight but the first one I wanted to start with was an update on cannabis and I brought my colleague Wade Cooper to talk about it because he has been working on this for a long time so Wade can take away

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed26:38

Good afternoon Mayor, Council Members. As you know I'm sure this is a big issue for our constituents as well as a big issue for your constituents so we wanted to come down and I wanted to come in person as Daisy mentioned I've been working on these issues for a long time and oversee this in our office and we do have couple of big things coming up. Just wanted to give an update and some clear idea of what's going to happen with the extensions for the updated odor abatement plans, which require carbon scrubbers in all of the grows here in the Carpinteria Valley.

Originally, the hearing was scheduled for March 3rd but did get moved to March 10th because we had some scheduling conflicts there. So there is no board meeting on March 17th so March 10th is the last day before the deadline where extensions can be filed for and that's really the only day. The meeting is going to be in Santa Maria, but for those of maybe you somebody from the city or most importantly the community members who'd like to come to speak about it.

They will be able to go to the county building at 105 East Anna Pamu Street and speak to the board meeting there at the Santa Barbara location. So that day, there will be staff presentations of about 15 minutes followed by analysis and recommendation on each extension. Those will be brief. Then five-minute applicant presentations for the eight seeking extensions for a total of about 40 minutes. And then the board will deliberate on each of those extensions.

If the board disagrees or agrees with the Planning and Development recommendation and wishes to deny, then staff will prepare findings for denial on the day. So other growers will know that day whether or not their extension has been granted or denied. If an extension is denied then this is a pretty important part of it The applicant loses their county cannabis license, they must remove their plants and they cannot legally continue cultivating.

However there are a few caveats there. The underlying planning entitlement remains vested runs with the land so at any point in time they can update their OIP come into compliance with the law and by that I mean put in carbon scrubbers and then continue operating. They can If a denial of the extension happens, there is an appeal process. Decision's not appealable to the Coastal Commissioner or another county board like that. This is the last stop but they can appeal to...

Well first county sends a notice and then applicant has I think I believe within a couple weeks to file for an appeal and then it goes before an administrative law judge, which is a state board that hears things like this. Carpinteria has been dealing with this for a long time. We were down in this room almost a year ago to have a hearing on cannabis and cannabis odor Don't want to speak for everybody, but I believe that we will make significant strides starting on March 18th. But I don't want to lead everybody to believe that on that day immediately everything is going to get fixed even if someone loses their license there will be a little bit of a lag period before all their plants come out and they're stopping producing So obviously, a few of the things we've done.

We reduced overall cultivation acreage, increased licensing fees and then required scrubbers to be installed so this has been a priority for Supervisor Lee's office along with majority of the board obviously and so we wanted to come and present you and see if you had any questions or any questions you might be getting from constituents that were not getting

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role30:56

Any questions? You mentioned that, oh sorry. No go for it. Mine's very quick and that there are eight businesses seeking extension so how many are in compliance then?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed31:07

So there are well so it's eight operations they operators sometimes have different addresses that they're working at so it's a number of different buildings but eight operators who are coming and looking for extensions if you want I can read off the addresses for you if that's useful Sure. Cool. 5775 Casitas, 1628 Cravens, 5138 Foothill, 4505 Foothill, 5888 Villarreal, 3651 Foothills, 5554 Casitas and 5980 Casitas. There's a couple who have Subsequently put in updated OAPs, but everybody else in the valley has scrubbers in so

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role31:52

how many what is the number of the operate the total? number of operators in the Carpentry a part of the county.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed31:58

I believe it's 18 greenhouse operations in the valley So right now there's fifty seven point six acres that have scrubbers in and operating and there's sixty point four That are are operating without scrubbers and so Like immediately that number is going to come down because of the two who are coming in with updated OAPs and scrubbers installed. And I can't, obviously it's a quasi-judicial, I can't even project how the supervisors are going to rule but I can tell you that Supervisor Lee has kept a very careful eye on this and has been very responsive to the community members on the issue.

Oh, one other thing that you all might get asked about is the vapor phase which is the odor masking agents that have been operating for a long time now. We hear about that almost as much as the odor. On March 18th those are banned under our county code and will no longer be allowed to operate. Great thank you. Yeah

0:33 – 0:4011 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed33:11

That was my question also so thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed33:17

And I will make way for my colleague Daisy Weber.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed33:26

I'm glad I didn't even attempt to mention all that stuff. Okay, so moving right along. I have some updates on housing. So last time I was here Council Member Nomura asked about a Cravens Lane update. So at the moment that is an open project and There are some inconsistencies that the applicant is working on. So all the county departments, fire planning, public works, they submitted some things that need to be fixed. I believe that County Planning and Development mentioned that the city had some comments about the frontage road public hearing on that.

Alrighty, okay. So then the next one is the Baylor project so on February 12th we had a big meeting in one of the meeting rooms here with teams from the city. So director Bob Roth Director Olason City Manager Ramirez was there, Carp Summerlin Fire Marshal was there. The applicant was there and their team of engineers and traffic study folks. And then County Public Works and Planning Development in our office was also there so... The applicant in that meeting supplied an updated project for kind of internal review, supplied their traffic study that they had done And then the takeaways from that meeting were that the applicant, the Red Tail folks were going to set up a meeting follow-up meetings with various stakeholders. So with city staff, with fire, with the Casitas Villages HOA to really kind of dig into different elements so that meeting was 90 minutes long and it was a lot of poking holes into what they had brought forward.

They also require an annexation into the Carp Sanitary District, into their service boundary so the applicant is going to meet with LAFCO about that and currently the Builders Remedy application is still open so that's something We are all urging them to remove, but the applicant still does have that open. I'm happy to answer any questions about that meeting.

Mr. Ramirez was there so you could also ask him.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentUnited StatesProposed36:20

Quick question for you on this one here, actually not a quick question but a question. We have well you've cited that they're going through the planning process right now for conformance so yeah project conformance once you have project conformance how is the county going to be addressing some of the issues or challenges with access ingress egress all of the above along with the developing of the common roads that we have between the city and the county?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed36:47

So that was predominantly what the meeting was about, was about the ingress-egress issues. I'm not a land use or a public works person so bear with me but it's a complicated area specifically because of the park, because of how many parcels abut this particular unit, because of the HOA, Pandanus, that alleyway because of the emergency access or lack of emergency access. So that meeting was really specifically to address some of the ideas that they had proposed so for instance one of the original applications for this project had a roundabout that was pretty quickly determined that that was not going to be a good solution so then the question becomes Where would they put their ingress, egress? And so that meeting between the city and the county public works engineers specifically really was addressing the ingress-egress issues.

And so the subsequent meetings that the applicant is having is to see what's a viable option. So that's what's being discussed right now.

CommentUnited StatesProposed38:09

Okay, so I'm assuming that the applicant will not be responsible for example of infrastructure traffic-wise within the city itself. For example if we're talking about Baylord we are going to have multiple areas so there's going to be traffic issues parking issues all the above and that's going to be extended beyond the scope and footprint of the project. So we're looking at Baylord overpass area there all of the stop signs going to be impacted there if we go to Cravens, we're going to have the same issue right there along Villarreal. And also again I state this that the county road that goes through near the or right at the cemetery district is extremely narrow it's almost driving driveway width and so if that's going to be handling more traffic i need to i would like to understand how the county is going to remedy that issue

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed39:03

Were you discussing Cravens and Baylor

CommentUnited StatesProposed39:05

in that? I'm talking about both because they're both going to be a problem with pretty much in the same areas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed39:10

Got it, well this is why this all goes to a planning commission into the hearing. I'm not the one that decides this stuff. I don't think anybody wants to see any traffic problems. I don't think anybody wants to see an emergency get backed up, so this is all part of the process and I do believe that the county's Entire role there's there's an entire department devoted to making sure that roads are safe and I'm the city has one too, so I completely hear you and perhaps when there's a Something to present we can get a public works person from the county down here to talk about it. But at this point it's just those questions are still being hammered out by the engineers and

CommentUnited StatesProposed40:07

Right. And the reason I bring this up, this is a unique situation in time. Right now we are working with the county and within the city. We have jurisdictions that have cross lines where we can't technically cross but I see in the benefit of both communities, the county and the city, that we have joint effort, that we have joint hearings that talk about how these impacts will be affecting the city And what the remedies with the county would have within our jurisdiction to assist us as we have more building done outside of our line but immediately adjacent to city properties.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed40:42

If that's something that council wants to do, I'm sure we could look into that.

0:40 – 0:4813 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed40:49

Uh, well first Council Member Nomara through the Mayor I just wanted to touch on some of the first questions regarding how things are going to be resolved. So I just want to start off by thanking Daisy and Supervisor Lee's office because there was no requirement necessarily for all these people to come together at this time with this Pre-planning, I think it's important that it is happening and Supervisor Lee recognized that and got us all into the room to start having these conversations. I don't think anybody had quite the answer to it yet right now we're more at the point where we're identifying what the constraints in the issues are so that we can get to the part where We're looking to develop solutions. What I can say is the city is participating, along with Carp Summerlin Fire District and county planning and development on ensuring that we get something that works for all parties.

And then related to the joint development review process, I know that Attorney Acos had some thoughts on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed41:53

Council Member Nomura through the Mayor. I'm not sure if you were, you may have just meant joint meetings which is what the City staff has been doing and I would recommend that as a way forward rather than joint hearings since we do not have, we have jurisdiction over the portion you were talking about with some of the ingress and egress issues but not over the project as a whole since it's outside of the city's jurisdiction so I think it's important to just make sure that that's very clear to the community This development project is taking place in the county, so under the jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors. But I think your point about continued joint meetings is well taken and should be...I think that's what staff is planning to do, to stay coordinated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed42:41

And I did want to add that that included, so part of the impact to our infrastructure obviously we're all concerned about what the impacts are going to be and how the city's going to manage that when we don't necessarily have full control over the project. And so that was definitely illuminated and discussed and they were reviewing their traffic study right now where it considers those impacts and then also the compounding impacts between their project, the potential Bluffs One Project And so we're actually looking at all of that, so that we know what the correct solution is. And so we will be working through all of that as well.

CommentUnited StatesProposed43:22

Sounds good. With that being said, right now we have SBCAG as one organization that's specific to transportation, public transportation. Is there potential that we would have something similar to that where the cities could work together with the county to come up with policy measures specifically for this housing element?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed43:49

Council Member North, through the Mayor. I'll have to do a little bit more research on that one and so if I could I'll come back to you at a future meeting with the response.

CommentUnited StatesProposed43:58

Of course, I didn't expect an answer on that one. It's just a possibility there thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed44:06

Thank you. Does this kind of extend that last discussion? I think one thing that we're coming to is a planning thing where you look ahead and you see potentially thousands more people living in that area, and you combine that with the bluffs housing. And so When you look at the infrastructure that's there, it probably all has to get changed out. And so the planning should be what is each developer's portion of that pie? What does it cost for that slice of pie?

And those should be fees that eventually get to the construction phase.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed44:59

Any other questions? Yes. It's less of a question and more of a comment, which I wanted to acknowledge that you being here and you bringing this information forward means these conversations are happening so first of all just thank you for bringing it to us. I think that meant for many residents of Carpinteria when we hear that there's a project going on in the county it feels that we have no say in what happens Just the fact that you are bringing us constant updates, you're telling us about these collaborative meetings. You're telling us about all of these districts that affect and are part of our city being part of the conversation.

That feels like a huge step in the right direction towards collaboration so I just want to acknowledge and say thank you for me as a resident who gets asked a lot of questions after you bring these informational meetings to us. I leave with a lot of answers So thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role45:55

Yeah, and... Oops, sorry. Oh no, go ahead. I just have a different question but I don't know if you wanted to respond to that? Okay. You mentioned that the applicant hasn't withdrawn their Builders Remedy Project. Was there an explanation...? Is there reasoning behind that because I know that sounded like that was a big part of the original discussion around these changes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed46:14

Yes. The applicant has mentioned that they I mean, developers are going to develop so they're going to look for the path of least resistance. So they're hanging on to the builder's remedy until it seems like that there is an easier route with the re-zones that might make things ministerial The rezones are going back to the Coastal Commission for final approval. That hasn't happened yet, it's still in the Coastal Commission's hands so that's what we've been told. Okay thank you yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed47:03

Vice Mayor Solorzano also added the county planning and development was saying that they were going to have to make a decision on which application. It was becoming too difficult to process both of those simultaneously, and so they'll have to make a decision at some point in the near future.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role47:17

Thank you that's very helpful thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed47:19

Yeah, and hopefully by the next meeting here we can report out on the meetings that the applicant had with staff around ingress egress around emergency access those are with fire. Those are all being hammered out at the moment And it's on the applicant to put those meetings together. I was pretty clear in the last meeting that I'm happy to bring people together, but it is not my job to usher through applications. So the applicant is hopefully working with staff on that and has indicated that they would like to meet collectively again mid-March. So that would be about a month from our previous meeting.

0:48 – 0:549 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:11

If I may interrupt really quick. Similar to what my colleague said, I'm really happy to know that we're back at the table with the county and the applicant. I think we've been down this road before and things fizzled out but i do think it shows that Carpinteria, at least the council has an eye on this project. It's important for us to be a part of it My hope is that we can continue to have these conversations and discussions so that it can benefit Carpinteria and the residents of Carpinteria, especially in those neighborhoods or in that neighborhood. And so my question really is directed to staff because although I appreciate the monthly updates, I feel like that might be...I think I'm looking for more updates or how can the council be more informed in terms of the conversations that are happening between city staff, the county, and the applicant?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed49:02

Mayor, you know right now I think staff has tried to as we reach milestones or we actually have some solid information wanted to bring that to all as part of our city managers reports are other things. You know right now the information I don't think would necessarily be incredibly helpful as we bounce back and disagree about this or that. And we don't really have, we haven't landed on any solid place. You know they provide the traffic study but we disagree maybe on what some of the results say they go back. We include new information there their traffic studies still had the farm project on it versus the bluffs one. And so it's more like currently an exchange of information so that their ideas and plans can be refined. And then I think you know as Daisy mentioned They're working on just providing us their new plan and Daisy and Supervisor Lee have been instrumental in sort of pushing them to get that up on the website.

So I think as we hit those milestones, we'll definitely be coming back with information for the council and the community.

CommentUnited StatesProposed50:07

One last point on that, sorry. This is looking at the Reno numbers that we have and they're again bringing forward the numbers that the county's going to be presenting on their Reno numbers. We have the potential of literally doubling the population of this valley that's going to be impacting directly to Carpinteria City Knowing that when we're talking about little numbers, when I say little numbers traffic things like that it's based on current time. It is not going to be based on the final end product where we have twice as many people living in the valley so I would like to see us err on the generous side as opposed to try and tightening those numbers as tight as we can because we'll be out of that one within 5-10 years. Yep

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:52

And sorry, I'm just going to interrupt one more time. This is more geared towards staff and so I think a comment similar to that I'm wondering how if council has some additional thoughts or ideas specific to That project how can we convey that information to you all or because we don't have the project? I mean it's not plans aren't up yet but I think it's that specific detail or comments from the council and I think it's important to To have an input in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed51:26

Mayor, I think there's maybe multiple answers to your question. I mean one of them would be like potentially like a workshop similar to what the county did on cannabis. We could have one of those here to have more information and get input not only from the council but from the community I do think, and I'll look to Jenna on this regarding some of the comments made about future impacts. We're certainly a staff very aware of that and also I think there's limitations on what we could ask of current development projects even when considering future impacts and that's one of the can be frustrating things of going through this process is knowing that there's other things but we're definitely doing the best we can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:09

Okay. I think a workshop is interesting, so I'd explore that but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed52:14

I'm wondering if maybe perhaps part of your city manager's report if you have a meeting like with these multi-jurisdictional it could just be noted that that meeting happened which then gives us the opportunity to you know dig these hard hitting questions that we're lobbing at Daisy to our staff who are at the meetings and may have a more nuanced point of view of what we're asking because I mean, you represent them. We're the city of Carpinteria so that's just one thought about it but I do love the idea of a workshop.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role52:49

If I could just make a comment about the workshop idea. I think the most important thing for me would be that it happens at the right time and that it doesn't happen too early before there's information that people can actually weigh in on in a way that would be productive I like the excitement about, you know having a workshop and getting more information. But I also acknowledge Daisy what you're saying that we don't have a lot of information right now and that we're waiting for some pretty specific steps to be crossed before we have the details to be able to respond to so I would just in terms for city staff I would hope that week We wouldn't rush into anything but we'll just will start planning those things when it makes sense to do so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed53:29

Vice Mayor Solorzano, through the mayor, thank you for that comment. I agree with you on that and also regarding the workshop, that will be something that we'll be relying on the county to put on so in terms of getting something like that prepared we'll be working with Supervisor Lee's office because it would be up to them to organize that because it would require their planning and development staff and so forth to be here So we will work with them and then also do it when we have some concrete information for people to consider.

0:54 – 1:019 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed54:05

Yep. And hopefully we can do this all again when the Van Wingerden properties come up, so you know consider it a test run. Okay thank you for all that feedback as well. Okay moving along I wanted to give some updates on some opportunities the county is has open for community members. So Cycle Mania is coming up. I know Carpinteria's participated in the past But they have little mini-grants for $700. The application deadline is tomorrow, but it's $700 for things related to bike events in May. So I've reached out to a couple community members that I know to let them know, but CycleMania, CycleMay, like the month, Nia, N-I-A. So you can go on that website at cyclemania.org.

Okay, and then there's the Arts Making Impact Grant which is the community office of arts and culture which is giving out in the realm of $50,000 to various applicants to getting art out into the community. They do it every year and so it'd be great to see some of that come down to Carpinteria. The other one that I think would be great to get out to the community more Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program, VITA. It's free tax help from the United Way for residents who make $67,000 or less in a year. It is by appointment only but the entire point is to help those residents get as much back as they can from their taxes So, there are the closest places that are doing this are on the Eastside Library and then the United Way offices in downtown Santa Barbara.

But that's the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program. So it's now through April 15th I believe and it's really great but make an appointment. And then the last thing I wanted to mention is the county is having a, they have their annual roadmap public workshop where Public Works goes through all the unincorporated roads that they plan on tackling in the coming fiscal year. So for 26-27 so that's going to be a virtual meeting on March 31st at 6 p.m There will be Spanish translation available but that is to go through all of the roads that are on the county side. So Council Member Nomura, I know you love roads so...

I would love to see you there. Two other things I wanted to mention. I know there's been some conversation about a Verizon cell tower that was changed up at the last minute Just to give you a heads up that Verizon and County General Services are talking about the feasibility of putting a cell tower on top of a county-owned property versus on Linden, which I know the community was not interested in. So Verizon and General Services are talking about that themselves and that would come back to the CART Planning Commission as another option so they're discussing that.

And that's all I've got tonight. Take any more questions and if there's anything you want to hear about in the future, you can always reach out and we can prep more information.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed57:54

Thank you for your presentation. Do you have another?

CommentUnited StatesProposed57:57

Just a real quick comment. Thank you very much for coming here. I know Daisy, we're not meaning to throw rocks at the messenger but we just want to get the word back to the community and the county making sure we have everything on the same page.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed58:10

I'm made of rocks, so... I'm a mountain. Okay thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:15

Thank you. I do not have any speaker slips but i'd like to open up the floor if anyone has a question. Seeing no slips, I will ask Brian if there's anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role58:26

Mayor we have no Zoom speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:28

Yeah we'll go ahead and close public comment. We will now move on to the City Manager's Report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed58:57

Sorry, my computer timed out and two-factor authentication took me a second. Okay, just want to start off as always and just say that we don't go through everything in a City Manager's Report. I always encourage people to go through and read the whole report there are helpful links in there. And we're going to start off today with some city employee updates by Assistant City Manager Ryan Kintz.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed59:28

Thank you Mr. Ramirez, Council good evening just a couple quick updates regarding our recruitments currently we have one open recruitment for the lifeguard program coordinator we are in the interview phase for that position this position is really important it continues our program quality and operational readiness for our coastal safety services additional information is on our website for those interested We also conducted some employee training and development last week. This training was called the Workplace Violence Awareness Training.

CJPIA, California Joint Powers Authority brought some staff up and they provided this presentation and training to all of our staff The training focused on identifying warning signs and behavioral indicators, managing disruptive or aggressive behavior, assessing environmental risks, response procedures and prevention strategies, and promoting a respectful and team-oriented workplace culture.

So it does support compliance with California Senate Bill 553 which requires employers to implement a Workplace Violence Prevention Plan. In addition, we also had some homelessness encampment cleanup safety training on February 19th. Several of our field employees attended the homeless encampment clean up safety training. This was built upon last month's encountering and serving individuals who are unhoused training.

This one really focused on common site hazards, Cal OSHA requirements, appropriate protective equipment, environmental and exposure risks and also de-escalation considerations during incidental encounters with homeless individuals. And that's it for me

1:01 – 1:088 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:01:17

I also want to just add how impressed I am by the quality of trainers that CJPIA sends us. The gentleman that they sent for the workplace violence program, he has a company that does those. He was a new dad. He's an LA Sheriff's deputy and he's an elected official so I was very amazed to see all the things that he does and he just came in As with all of our trainers, we really focus on making sure it's really easy and sometimes unavoidable to do the online trainings that you have to do. But we've really focused on trying to get people here and our folks in a room where they can ask questions and have interaction so really grateful for HR department and CJPIA. At this time I'd like to bring up our principal planner Mindy Fogg in place of our community development director Nick Bobrov who's out to just give some updates there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:02:09

Thank you, Michael. Good evening Mayor and Council. Our first update for community development is on the Surfliner Inn. We are well into the public comment period for the draft environmental impact report or EIR. So last week on February 18th, the Environmental Review Committee held a public meeting to consider the draft EIR staff gave a brief presentation and then the committee heard public comments from about 14 or 15 speakers Ultimately the committee recommended acceptance of the EIR with suggestions that additional information be included on biological resources, transportation and hydrology.

So we want to make perfectly clear that we are still accepting written comments so people can send in their written comments until 5 p.m. on March 9th and all of the information is on the project website under Hot Topics Surfliner Inn. Our second update is on the proposed Ogun Road housing project. This is the 130 unit multi-family development proposed at 5115 Ogun Road.

You might recall that in December, the applicant filed a written notice under state housing law Indicating that the city's course of action or course of conduct is undertaken for an improper purpose. And so per state law, we publicly posted that notice on our website and we provided a preliminary response. However the notice is still open to public comments and so we wanted to once again mention that if anyone has objections, comments, evidence or concerns about the project or about the applicant's written notice please submit those to us by March 9th same date And all of this information is on our Housing Projects page.

And then our third and final update is regarding this week's agenda for the Architectural Review Board. One item will be considered by the ARB this Thursday, February 26th at 530 PM meeting and it's the preliminary review of the Surf Cottages Condominium project located at 4716 7th Street. The agenda and staff report is up on our agendas and meetings website.

And that's all I have unless there are any questions for me?

CommentUnited StatesProposed1:04:53

Quick question, there's a rumor going around social media they did see regarding the community garden in it being taken away as part of the development for the surf liner so I'd like to have clarification on that for the public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:05:09

Thank you Council Member Nimura, through the Mayor. Yes in the draft EIR for the Surfliner Inn there are four alternatives analyzed besides the no project alternative And so of the four build alternatives, alternative number three is called the Garden Relocation Alternative and it analyzes what the impacts would be if the garden were moved south of the train tracks to where the city-owned lot 4 is currently proposed.

then parking were extended north of the train tracks where the garden currently is. And so that is just an alternative being analyzed, but we welcome you know any public input on the analyzed alternatives whether people think it's a good idea not a good idea. We welcome that kind of input as well.

CommentUnited StatesProposed1:06:14

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:06:15

Can I ask a quick follow-up question for that one? So why, just for people who might have heard Council Member Moreau's question on TV or online. Why do the alternatives exist? Like why is that a part of the draft environment review

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:06:29

process? Thank you, Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor. That is a requirement in California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA. If you're preparing an EIR, you have to analyze alternatives that might reduce or change the environmental impacts. And the four alternatives that are analyzed were born out of mainly public comments that we received last year when we initiated the scoping and notice of preparation. In particular, there were a lot of concerns about having the parking lot The new city public parking lot, having it located south of the train tracks and having it also serve the hotel which is north of the train tracks. So that's why for instance alternative number three analyzes a different scenario. There are also a couple other scenarios about the parking lot and then there's also the fourth alternative which would reduce rooftop uses of the surf liner inn.

And so under CEQA we tried to come up with a reasonable range, I will note that you know it's still a draft EIR and so if there is an alternative that is worthy of review but it's not yet in that EIR let us know because we can still potentially discuss it in the final EIR I have a question

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:08:10

in terms of the EIR.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:08 – 1:1315 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:30

And so it was approved with some additional review from staff in terms of wildlife or something to the effect, is that correct? Yes. And so in terms of the comments that the community has made or questions were they addressed during the EIR or how and it also sounds like the public comment is still open until the 9th So how will the EIR committee take into account those questions, and is there some kind of a page that lays out all the questions that the community has asked for reference or for

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:09:15

transparency? Yes, thank you. Great question Mayor Alarcon. Yes we still have to address what we heard last week not only at the committee meeting but also throughout this comment period with all of the written comments that were receiving and the way that we do that is in the final EIR there's going to be this whole section responding to comments received during this 45-day review period including what the committee added to their suggestions. So, their vote last week was to recommend to the Planning Commission that the draft EIR is adequate but needs some additional information.

They don't get to review the final EIR instead the Planning Commission will review it when they consider the whole project and it will include all of our responses to comments and any additional information added such as additional review of alternatives, additional study that was borne out of these comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:10:24

Great, so then at the next stage of the Planning Commission there's still an opportunity for potential amendment to the final EIR or changes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:10:34

That's a great question. It would be potential that because it is going to be our proposed final so there is a possibility that the Planning Commission will want something further added to it before It becomes final, but a lot of that will depend also on what the Planning Commission's decision is such as on the options that we were just discussing. Will their decision be to approve the project as proposed or to approve an alternative or to not approve the project? So a lot will go into that decision, and then that will also factor into how the EIR is finalized.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:11:20

Great. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:11:27

Thank you, Mindy. And Mayor, I just want to clarify that the Environmental Review Committee approved the draft environmental impact report and not the final which is why there's still...

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:11:43

Sure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:11:45

Gonna stop for one second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:11:49

Thank you. I wanted to just hammer home, Mayor Alico and Councilmembers, that what is currently circulating is a draft. It's not a final, it's a draft. That's what went to the ERC, that's what the city is looking for comments on and then City staff will work with the city's environmental consultant to revise the draft based on those comments and respond to each one of those comments and there'll be what is called an appendix so The comments, each comment will be included in the appendix with the City's response. I believe I'm correct. Thank you Mindy for your nodding, yes. So this is everything out there is currently in draft form. There will be a proposed final which then goes to the Planning Commission but there is no final EIR at this point for action.

Great. Wanted to make sure that was clear.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:12:49

That's what I was going to say, just like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:12:54

So could I ask a clarifying question? So the draft EIR only becomes final once the Planning Commission approves it, is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:13:05

So Councilmember Clark through the Mayor, yes and no. There's a proposed final so it is considered a final EIR that is presented to the planning commission and I believe that the correct terminology is if the planning commission, I think Mindy was talking about approving, they certify the EIR. So they would certify the EIR and then along with certifying the EIR you approve the permits but you can't approve the permits without certifying the EIR

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:13:41

So then the Planning Commission could conceivably make changes to the EIR and they don't have to come back to them?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:13:49

That that could be an option.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:13:50

Okay, all right thank you.

1:13 – 1:204 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:13:57

If no other questions we actually have several Parks Recreation and Community Services updates and fortunate to have Tory Cutworth with us our program manager in that department for those updates.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:14:12

Thank you, good evening Mayor and Councilmembers. I am just going to share a few highlights from our department tonight. So I'm very excited to share our Age Well program coordinator Jenna Jenkins has been selected to speak at this year's National Council on Aging conference taking place this May in Arlington Virginia Jenna's presentation, From Isolation to Connection Programming Specialized for Aging Men will highlight innovative approaches to engaging older men through targeted meaningful programming.

This organization is dedicated to improving the lives of adults age 60 plus and the Council on Aging brings together leaders and professionals from across the country to address the challenges and opportunities facing older adults. Jenna is going to share her experiences and expertise in developing specialized programming for men, and offer practical strategies and actionable ideas so that the attendees of her talk will leave the session equipped with valuable tools and insights to create and implement programming tailored older men in their own communities.

Very, very excited and proud of Jenna. In addition on Friday February 6th Agewell hosted a tour of the Sheriff's Office and City Hall for 16 participants of Carpinteria Children's Projects Abuelas program. City staff provided overviews of each department in Spanish to the attendees And the visit concluded with lunch in the City Council Chambers here to encourage familiarity and participation in city council meetings with the participants.

Last Friday, Age Well welcomed over 110 guests at the annual Age Well Dance which was an Aloha Friday luau theme. At the Veterans Memorial Hall, the free community event featured food, tropical music, hula dancing and more. Agewell's March lecture series coming up will focus on basic home fix-it skills that everybody should know and it's going to be presented by the city's very own Ryan Ayerly, our Public Works Program Manager who will present to Agewell members on you know basic home fix-it skills that they can bring to their home and families.

And then lastly, some updates from the community garden. This Thursday, February 26th, the garden will host a free bilingual fruit tree pruning workshop led by Mesa Harmony Gardens Advisory Board Chair Russ Balducci and translated by City of Carpinteria Public Works Assistant Engineer and Community Garden Member Josefina Archiga. This hands-on workshop will cover basics and best practices of pruning fruit trees, and provide an opportunity for garden members to build skills and ask questions.

And then lastly the garden will host an art and sensory Carpinteria homeschool group for a school field trip on Thursday February 26th at 10 30 am And the kids will have a tour of the garden, learn about different flowers, fruits and veggies. And they will all also get to plant a little seed to take home with them. So those are a few of the updates from our department if you have any questions.

Okay thank you so much! Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:18:07

Thank you, Tori. And I'll end it just by reminding folks that we're still receiving ballots for our two assessment districts, the Winter Berm District and the Landscape Maintenance District. Our public hearing is scheduled for March 9th and people are able to return their ballots up until the close of hearing on that day. In addition, at our last meeting we received several questions about the assessment districts and since that time staff has prepared a Frequently Asked Questions page. And so now several of those questions are up on the website Again, that's CarpinteriaCA.gov forward slash assessment districts and people can go there. And then I was also asked last time from Vice Mayor Solorzano just to remind folks about what a yes vote and a no vote is and I wanted to read it directly from our mailer because these the same information is on the website for people And essentially a yes vote means that the updated district will replace the current one that's in place.

The updated district has rates that now reflect what the current costs of the services are, so that would mean that the general fund would no longer have to subsidize those districts for what they're not bringing in to cover their costs and that money would go back to the general fund. Similarly, for the Winter Berm District if a no vote would mean that the existing assessment district would stay in place. There is one in place but the rates are set from 1996 and then the general fund will continue to fund those districts and the districts will continue to not be sustainable and require some sort of a subsidy moving forward So, just as a reminder for folks on the yes and no vote. And I think that is all from me and happy to answer any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:20:14

Any questions? Seeing none, I will open up public comment on the City Manager's report. Rogelio Delgado, welcome.

1:20 – 1:277 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:20:39

Thank you. This pamphlet actually, one sentence says it all. Updating the city wide landscape maintenance district. Your vote matters. This is it! People of Carpinteria, you have to make a choice whether to approve the city's assessment or not. I have already mailed my ballot approving it for the benefit of the city's general fund and for the benefit of our residents. This assessment has not been increased since 1996 Proposition 218 makes it legal for the city to come up with a ballot.

Now, inflation, prices, expenses, salaries are not the same as of 1996. The city needs you to approve the assessment to keep and improve services such as landscaping maintenance, park services, public safety, fire services, sidewalk repairs, irrigation If the assessment is not approved, then this money will be taken out of the... General fund to cover the increased expenses, but some city services will not remain the same. Some services will be reduced like park services, public safety services. I highly recommend property owners to approve this assessment for the benefit of our families and ourselves. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:22:31

Thank you for your comments Mr. Delgado I do not have any other speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:22:39

Mayor, we have no Zoom speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:22:41

I'll go ahead and close public comment for the city manager's report and

we will move on to the next item which is public comment on matters not in the agenda and we will begin with Alan Koch. Welcome.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:22:59

Good evening City Councils staff. I'm here for one of my regular sort of public service comments. Joke. But really, I'm here as a follow-up to an email that I sent to the directors of Public Works and the Community Development Department. I think it was on the 17th that I copied my normal CC list of staff and City Council. And it's really, it's related to what we heard from Mindy and the city manager Michael here about Wednesdays, last Wednesday's meeting which I first all have to say is I appreciate what the development department is doing here going through the whole EIR process. It's amazing It's 400 pages that draft with 1,600 pages of comments and studies. But it's really, really needed.

It's going to improve the whole process there. So kudos to the staff there. But I want to just bring it down now A comment around the transportation side of it, which is an example. Okay? The draft has a conclusion that transportation, one of the CEQA environmental impact sections Pretty much, I think they came with a less than significant class 3 under transportation.

Okay? And that includes parking demands, that includes traffic flows on Linden, okay? Safety for pedestrian going around the new parking lot on Parking Lot 4 and the proposed hotel and crossing the tracks and so forth. What we noticed is that there are statements made in the main section of it. And then you have to look at the detail appendix that supports the studies, the studies that support this.

So my email that I sent on the 17th, the day before the meeting was related to in July I think Public Works came here for another $35,000 expenditure to do an update on the Walker study that was 2019. Okay? And the rationale both John and Nick were there were saying the rationale is we need a new baseline with the opening of Linden Square. Makes sense. And then to have that new baseline figure go understand the impact of the hotel. So I see my out of time already, but what happened there is that the study is a 2019 so my request to the mayor to this to the staff that would like to have a staff update maybe through the city manager report at the next meeting of why isn't the August study the new basis of the traffic study that the DER or now going to be the final EIR is based upon.

So it just doesn't, I just don't see things squaring up here. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:26:59

Thank you for your comments Mr. Koch. We will now hear from Mike I'm sorry, I don't...I'm not sure how to pronounce your last name. Welcome.

1:27 – 1:334 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:27:14

Thank you Council and staff. I've received notice from the gas company that they're going to have a study in March which to implement SB State California SB 1221 which would allow the gas company to shut down neighborhoods and replace them with zero emission alternatives, in other words all electric systems. Back in 2003 I think two of the council members were still here, the City Council introduced what's called a REACH amendment and it was ordinance 764 Which would have prohibited gas appliances on new construction and remodels in the city of Carpinteria.

That was met with a very large public opposition from local opposition, there was statewide support but locally we were pretty well opposed to it. In this study, my fears is that they're asking now for volunteers communities to have their gas shut off. And my point is I wrote the thing if you look next door that received almost 1700 comments mostly all negative.

My fear is that you somehow decide that we should be in this pilot program please don't jump the gun You've got enough issues with traffic and projects to take on this one, so please do not support this SB 121 and put us on some sort of pilot program. Let some other community take that bullet. You don't need this. Thank you.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:29:17

Thank you for your comments. Jamie Diamond, welcome!

CommentJamie DiamondProposedself-stated1:29:31

Good evening Mayor, Councilmembers and staff. I am Jamie Diamond. I am a Carpinteria resident, a fisherman, recreational fisherman, mom and wife of recreational fishermen, mom of a commercial lobster fisherman, and I own a fishing business out of the Santa Barbara Harbor. Right now the State of California Fishing Game Commission is going through a process that they did not ask for, which is evaluating new and expanded MPA petitions. The MPA Network of California is robust and doing well, and they came up with 27 recommendations none of which were for new and expanded MPAs. There's a lot of other ways that this network could be Adaptively managed and improved and unfortunately a lot of groups came out of the woodworks and put petitions together for communities like ours without consulting our own community.

And I want to bring your attention to it because there are a series of important meetings coming up on May 5th and 6th In Santa Barbara the location to be determined but one of these petitions while The original petition would have closed fishing access From Carpinteria Beach all the way through Summerland. It has been amended and it is technically out of jurisdiction of Carpinteria But it is just on the other side of the salt marshes where it begins however, it will affect carpenter Ian's it will affect our Our community members who rely on subsistence fishing, our community members that recreationally fish, our community members who are commercial fishermen. Carpinteria as you mentioned in your proclamation earlier today this evening has a long and rich history of fishing for recreation and for subsistence, and for commercial purposes.

Off our waters they are rich and robust and healthy which is one of the reasons why this was not asked to happen by the Fishing Game Commission. West Coast fisheries California in particular have the most sustainably managed in the world fisheries. And for the first time in my lifetime there are no ground fish stocks that are currently overfished and that is a huge thing to be celebrated And so I bring to you a letter from the Santa Barbara County Fish and Game Commission to the Fish and Game Commission of California, specifically on the petitions within our county jurisdiction. So this is the abridged version specific to our area. And then the second one is larger but it also contains Petition 29 which is the petition that I'm most concerned about off our Carpinteria area And this is a coalition letter with almost 30 different organizations and clubs and businesses from across the state, as well as five dedicated scientists.

And their input was provided on all of these to either accept, reject or accept with modifications. The Carpinteria petition, Petition 29 is a clear reject and it lays out from a scientific standpoint as well as from a human aspect why this is not appropriate for the area. And the biggest part that I just need to reiterate is the organizations that put this petition forward It was their duty to do outreach to the community of Carpinteria, to the fishing community and they did not do that. And so I ask that you would consider writing a letter to the Fishing Game Commission on behalf of our community and the fishermen whether you're free diving, surf fishing, fishing from a boat to protect our access this is the last such rocky reef kelp area that is accessible to fishing because all the others are already in MPA's in our area So, to take this away would really cause a lot of harm both from recreational and commercial standpoints.

Thank you and I am available for questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:33:22

Thank you for your comments. Appreciate it. Rogelio Delgado?

1:33 – 1:399 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:33:32

As a citizen of the United States, I have joined the Deputy Mayor Monica Solorza in not supporting the oath to the flag. It is freedom of expression. We have a man, Donald Trump, damaging absolute values such as equality, freedom, unity, family unity, immigration values. The country needs to be united As a U.S. citizen For months, I have joined Vice Mayor Monica Solorzano in standing for the Pledge of Allegiance. It's free speech.

We have a man, Donald Trump, that mentioned American absolute values. We have to value absolute values like equality, freedom, unity, family togetherness, immigration values. The United States needs to be united not divided. That defines humanity. Issue number two, I highly recommend proving the city's assessment for our own benefit to keep every maintenance service as we have them.

Mail it before March 9th. Make your ballot count. Do not let other people decide for you. Thank you.

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:22

Thank you for your comments. I do not have any other speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:35:28

Mayor, we do. We have Lorraine McIntyre. Lorraine, go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed1:35:38

Good evening, council and staff and mayor. This is Lorraine McIntyre. I wanted to speak about EV charging stations. I'm privy to some information through another committee that I serve on that the EV charging stations currently throughout the city get an average of three hours a week of use. And that takes these parking spots out of use for anyone else. I understand that the EV charging stations were funded in part by grants from the state of California and that we're locked in for a three year period, I don't think that turns out until next year but looking at the EIR for the Surfliner, I noticed that they had a requisite amount Thank you for your comments.

And there that concludes zoom comment

not transcribed≈27s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:36:59

I will go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the council. If there's any questions that you may have from the public commenters? Okay, I don't think I have any questions for staff either. Go ahead. I'm very interested

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:37:19

in This is the first time I'm hearing about it. Recognizing that I wasn't on City Council, Maybe when it started. I don't know if our the other fellow City Council members are familiar with it, but I feel that it would be really Important for us to at least know what that what this is pertaining to as It will affect us

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:37:59

Councilmember through the mayor happy to bring something back as part of our next city managers report Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:38:07

And now I'll just share in terms of MPA's. I know I've received Emails in support or requests for the city to support MPAs. And so I've had some brief conversations with Jamie, but she definitely seems like an expert So I think if city if you all don't have the timer I Don't want to say energy But the time may be bringing in Jamie to explain more of this might be a good idea But I'll leave that up to you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:38:37

Mayor, absolutely we'll reach out to her. I know that they had asked us for some comments and Director Bob Roth had provided many of the same comments regarding there was an original or an early version it didn't allow for the recreational fishing That should mention and we just provide that point of time they were just asking for comments and all of that stuff was was included in their most recently they submitted another one that was supposedly sort of incorporating some of the comments we made and it would we make additional comments many have.

We will move on to the consent calendar. I do not have any speaker slips for public comment, but I'd like to open up the floor and I'll ask if we have anyone via Zoom.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:39 – 1:459 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:39:44

I'll go ahead and close public comment and bring it back to the Council for questions, and of course a motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:39:52

I'll move to approve the minutes of the meeting held February 9th, 2026 to receive and file the warrant register for the period February 2 through February 13, 2026 To receive and file the report of contracts executed by the City Manager for the period of January 6 through February 2, 2026. To receive and file the monthly Treasurer's Report on Compliance with Statement of Safekeeping and Investment of Public Funds for January 2026. And to approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Library Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and the City of Carpinteria. Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:40:29

We have a first and second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? None. We'll now move on to administrative matters, which is item number 13 agreement with Big Green Cleaning Company for janitorial services.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:40:46

Good evening, Council. The item tonight is a consideration of an agreement with Big Green Cleaning Services or Big Green Cleaning Company for janitorial services. To provide some background following an RFP in December 2019 the City Council authorized then-City Manager to execute an agreement with Big Green Cleaning Company for janitorial services. This stipulated a five year term with the option of three one year periods at the city's discretion.

On January 13th, 2025 the City Council authorized Amendment No. 1 to the agreement extending the term through December 31st, 2025. Consistent with Section I of the Adoptive Procurement Policy, the Public Works Department published and distributed a formal request for proposal in December 2025 for janitorial services. And this section of the procurement policy simply says that every three to five years, we must go out and attempt to get more bids or proposals to ensure we're still getting a good price.

Following this RFP, staff evaluated the submittals and determined that Big Green was the highest rated firm. Working with Big Green, city staff established this table which is seen in your staff report. It outlines the city facilities, the frequency per week, the 2026 monthly fee, 2027 monthly fee as well as a proposed funding source. In addition to the regularly scheduled services, city staff also requested a fee schedule for on-call services.

Notably window cleaning at a few different locations such as City Hall, Betz Hall Library and Pool. Biohazard cleanups in the parks area, as well as the right-of-way area. And then carpet cleaning at City Hall and Library. So there's a fee either flat rate or hourly rate and then the staff recommendation for the not to exceed amount and then the funding source again The proposed terms of the agreement would be an initial two-year term starting March 1st, 2026 and then an option for three subsequent one year extensions at the City's discretion.

The total two-year agreement value would be not to exceed $500,592.36 which is inclusive of those on call services. Year one would run between March 1st, 2026 and February 28th, 2027 and would cost approximately $247,000. And then year two, March 1st, 2027 through February 28th, 2028. And that would be $253,000. This is because of a 3% CPI increase that would be applied for the second year.

With that, the staff recommendation is to authorize the city manager to execute the agreement with Big Green Cleaning Company for janitorial services in an amount not to exceed 500-592,036. With that we open it up to questions and we do have representatives from Big Green, Alan, Jim and Judd that can help me answer any questions you may have.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:15

Questions from Council?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:44:16

I just have two quick questions. One thing I noticed in the staff report, it looks like a change is going to be nightly locking of the restrooms at El Carro Park and Monta Vista Park. To confirm was that something that wasn't being done before? Because I know some of the other city restrooms are locked at night so any background on that?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:44:35

Through the mayor, currently Big Green does assist with locking some bathrooms at night. I think that would be the downtown restrooms and then maybe the ones over by the beach. We were going to expand that service citywide because our staff typically end their day at 435 but the parks typically don't close until sunset which is hours later depending on time of year so this new agreement would expand that service to all locations

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:02

I think that's great for those bathrooms, especially to have them locked at night is a good move. And then if residents do come across any urgent cleaning issues with any of the locations that are in the table, what's the best step for them to take to kind of log in those concerns?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:20

We would refer people to the public service request platform GoGov which can be found on the city website or through a mobile application site such if you have Apple, the App Store or the Android store. And then submit a request there, select the location, a description and pictures and we'd respond to it as quick as possible. Okay got it thank you very much

1:45 – 1:5820 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:45

Any other questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:45:47

Thank you. I'm assuming there's no qualified applicants in the City of Carpinteria?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:57

Through the mayor, I don't recall if we did look at all of the janitorial service providers within both Ventura County and Santa Barbara County. I don't recall if there are any based out of Carpinteria but in total our list I believe was 12 companies that we identified.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:46:16

Okay and then I noticed that in the table it doesn't include City Hall is that a separate contract with somebody else? Or did I miss that? It should be in there. OK, oh yeah, I see it. Sorry, sorry, sorry.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:46:35

Three days a week.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:46:36

OK and then lastly looking at the evaluation criteria, isn't price a factor? You don't see that discussed at all. Isn't that one of the main objectives of getting a bid is to find out what's the lowest bid?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:46:53

Yeah, the initial process was a qualification-based selection and then subsequent steps would be negotiation of cost. And if the city and the identified most qualified contractor can come to mutually agreed price they would default to the others but the Public Works Director can elaborate more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:47:20

Thank you, Stefan. Madam Mayor, Council Member Clark, so maintenance services Does not fall under the criteria of the public contract code. So, the California Public Contract Code does require public works projects or public works contracts to be solicited through competitive bid process. This is still a competitive process but like Stephan mentioned this is a qualification-based selection process The fee or the cost is a factor, but it's not the sole factor unlike a hard bid like a public works contract. So maintenance work does not fall under the definition of public works contracts like a construction project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:48:11

Okay thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:13

Any other questions? I think i'll follow up based off of your question Council Member Clark, because I do think even though it might not be the only cost might be the only factor. I feel as though because of the situation that we're in as a city in terms of increased revenue no not increased revenue increased expenses. I don't want to scrutinize every contract that we begin to look at moving forward but I do want to make sure that that's something that City staff is scrutinizing and in this case, based on the policy it looks like we should be receiving three bids but we only have two. Is that pretty standard procedure to just keep moving through the process if we don't have a third?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:49:00

Madam Mayor, good question. So when the proposal or RFP excuse me is put out we try to broadcast it more on a local level in this particular case Santa Barbara Ventura And when we feel we don't receive enough, we could re-advertise the RFP. In this particular case, we reached out to a dozen already. We provided ample time and correct me if I'm wrong, Stefan is about a two month period of RFP?

About one month. About one month. That's ample time for companies or firms to look at the RFP and respond accordingly if they do wish. We did, like you mentioned or noticed, we did have two. One staff determined that it was unresponsive. Matter of fact, we were provided a brochure of their firm as opposed to a proposal. So the firm that is before you, that city staff is recommending to authorize an agreement to has found that their proposal was responsive to the RFP.

We could have put it out in a longer period but I believe one month is usually the standard period and provides long time actually for firms to respond to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:50:32

Mayor, if I could also add on to that. So the requirement is that the city solicit three bids and so in this case we solicited 12 and received the two. You know my previous cities that I've worked in I would go out and solicit for t-shirt vendors, but eventually we would always go with the same person and it became very difficult to even receive people to put together. To even go after it because they knew that they couldn't compete with whoever the other person was and you would get zero bids. And so I used to have to maybe provide a memo of like when I called or email that was sent and just to show that we attempted to solicit the three bids but not always received.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:51:16

Yeah, I think that's helpful but I go back to where we are in a financial place in terms of the city and this seems silly to have this conversation around this particular contract because it's just a few thousand dollars and of course there's inflation which they're seeing in the fee or the increase in fee. But what I do want to ensure is that When it's not a monopoly in terms of like the exact example that you gave. And so I also want to ensure that the city has the best.

opportunity to select our vendor and not just be with the vendor because they're the only applicant. And that this is not to say that Big Green isn't doing a great job, but I think I want to ensure that we continue to have more bids and I don't know what that means on the city's staff side because I think that you all did your due diligence in terms of reaching out to the 12, but I wonder if at some point we need to start implementing more steps to increase the bids that we're receiving.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:52:25

Mayor,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:52:29

point taken I think one of the things we're starting to do with like some of the other contract things that were putting out we are you know there was a point in time where the city did try to keep promotion of things, local and now we're getting things out to planet bids and all over the place. Sometimes with things like janitorial services you just become limited by how far people are willing to drive to provide this kind of service. You know what their current number of clients that they have and then the size of our You know, what we're requesting sometimes they're too small and can't provide the services or you know where they just already have enough or sometimes they're so big maybe are the size of our project isn't large enough. So you kind of go through all those things and then in terms The quality and being able to take that into account, whether it be city attorney services or janitorial services.

Also understanding that you know I've certainly been places where the janitorial services, you weren't your pain more because of the amount that you had to do to maybe redo things or whatever so there is Some consideration there and I think what staff does is we also go out and try to research the market. And that's where the negotiating part comes in sometimes with the bid process you just kind of get what they give you, and then this one the city gets to determine what they feel is appropriate and what we can afford and then there's a negotiating process so It's a little bit different in terms of ensuring that you're getting a price that you feel comfortable with versus the bid. There are certainly a lot of, I think, issues with the closed-bid process because you have people just trying to figure out what the other person is going to bid and just trying to be maybe just under that so I don't think any of the situations is perfect but in this one, you know, with all the steps that we went through, I feel comfortable We got to a good place, but regarding wanting to get more people to submit.

We're definitely doing that for all of our contract stuff and the 12 companies that we reached out to I feel like we're all the ones here locally that could have competed But we will for all the things that we do continue to try to reach out to more and more folks

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:54:50

Yeah, if I can just do a follow-up to that. Are you going to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:54:55

say? I'll defer to you. Okay and then you go okay sure so I mean I absolutely 100% agree with the mayor's point although you know the trigger word was non responsive And I think that's something that could have been included in the staff report, and has been in prior times. You get the notion that you really can't compare the proposals because one doesn't even answer the question. So I think that's what happened in this case but I agree with the Mayor's proposition that we really do need to try to get the best for our money.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:55:44

Well, I think this discussion makes me think of the fact that we've had a version of this discussion many, many times. It seems like there's a history of wanting to have more bids whether it's for construction project or for services like this particular contract here. We talked so many times about wishing that and trying to and staff talking about how they are widening that net even beyond local which is another something that council wants to always try to get local companies. But even, I know we've been looking further afield just in the hopes of getting more bids. And so this seems like this is such a kind of consistent issue that is... I agree that we should always try to find more options but at the same time it just for the past almost four years I've been on council, this seems like a conversation that we've had many times in terms of the city trying to reach out and get more bids and just not having people that are supplying them.

And so I think there's a point where, I don't know what more the city can do to try to get bids that are both local and that are also competitive and that give a range of the services that we need. So I wanted to just note that I've seen that pattern and it is frustrating that we're kind of always circling this issue but there seems to be a limited amount that we can do for it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:57:01

Yeah, thank you for that comment Vice Mayor Solorzano. Through the mayor as Jenna was because Jenna represents multiple other agencies and then in my meetings with other city managers I just want to point out that this is not unique to Carpinteria. I think we have some unique things of our community and the size of our projects and stuff that impact us differently than other cities it's not uniform but this is something that's widespread here in the county for sure and I think even outside And so yeah, definitely doing what we can but I just wanted to make sure it's not just unique to Carpinteria Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:57:40

and just to bring it back to the you know matter at hand which is The contract with big green clean kind of cleaning company. I think you know qualifications qualification based You know, decision making is really important in this aspect especially when you're talking about maintenance that's done seven days a week including locking bathrooms and so on and so forth. So, you know, locality is actually really important in this aspect.

And so, you know... I can really appreciate that we're put in a situation of having to weigh them all at the same time, but that qualifications-based feels very important specific to this contract.

1:58 – 2:0512 turns

CommentUnited StatesProposed1:58:28

I'd like to bring up, you know, I agree that there are certain circumstances where we should see three bids. But I'm looking at Big Green. They've been around with us since well 2020 so it's been quite a while. I've always seen them never seen a complaint come through that they missed their jobs And we have to take a look, too. Not only the pricing but also the performance that we're receiving for that one. They've been extremely reliable. If we had a new company come in there's good potential that we may see excessive costs on the other side, things that weren't included.

Deferred maintenance is another point we have to look at. If we reduce the amount of maintenance for specific items and areas, we are going to increase the deferred maintenance cost at the other end of it. Having something reliable, in my opinion, is something that we've been very lucky to have. So those are my opinions and again, we can't compare apples and oranges if you don't have the apples.

Again I'm basing the decision we're going to make tonight on the reliability of this company. They did excellent work

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:59:40

Great. Okay, any other questions? Seeing none I will go ahead and open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom? I'm here We have no

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:59:48

raised hands.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:59:49

I'll go ahead and close public comment now bring it back to the council for any further Questions and or a motion

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:59:55

I move to authorize the city manager to execute an agreement with big green clean company for janitorial services in an amount Not to exceed five hundred thousand five hundred ninety two dollars and thirty six cents. I'll second that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:00:06

great We have a first and a second roll call vote, please

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Vice Mayor Solorzano. Aye. Council Member Clark. Aye. Council Member Mayer. Aye Council Member Nomura. Aye And Mayor Alarcon. Aye

Agreement passes unanimously and I'll just one final comment just to wrap up this conversation or discussion, I do think similar to what everyone said of course This might be similar to what other municipalities are experiencing, and of course it's case-by-case in terms of the number of bids that we receive. But I just want staff to take on that different perspective because if we continue to do what we've always done, that's not going to change so I just encourage some outside-of-the-box thinking there.

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:00:53

I'd also like to thank Big Green for doing an outstanding job. Thank you very much, appreciate it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:00:59

Would you like to speak? Yes, you're more than welcome to share a few words. Welcome and I apologize for skipping

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:01:04

that. First of all I want to say thank you for that approval and I want to give a little more background kind of understand what you've asked your staff to do and how that affects us on janitorial companies first of all we are local company we have our main offices in Santa Barbara we have an office in Shepherds Plaza over here on Carpinteria Avenue. We're grateful we've been serving the city of Carpinteria for more than two decades, it's been almost 25 years now so we thank you for the service I want to let give you some comfort to know that your reputation rides on every toilet that we clean and so does ours so we're in this together we serve at your pleasure we serve at the pleasure of your staff But it's important to us, so I know it's just toilets and you take on a lot of really big things but To us bathrooms are very important and we take it very seriously The And your staff has been fantastic to work with regarding pricing.

We are really good at this if you find yourself in Financial situations where you need to make some cutbacks. We're really good at this and working with people who've done it all the time with municipality of private businesses Budgets get tight we work with you to find out where you can save as best you can With feeling the least amount of impact, so we're there for you and have done this actually in years past We've done this with a city of Carpinteria in years past when they got a little tight Regarding the bid process, which I know is important to everybody. I'm going to give you a half...I will say this. First of all, you're getting a really good deal. You are getting a really good deal and yes some of our competitors might be afraid to bid against us in this particular thing because they know we've been here so long.

You also have some public bathrooms that are difficult for other...some competitors to bid in especially if they come from out of town. There are two other bids that we are currently working on and yes we have offices down south there are two cities Just south of here, one of them is their bid and we know this is best value. The other is lowest price where in fact I submitted we're currently doing these bids Our pricing is different for the two of them. And one of the cities, I won't mention either city's name, but one of the cities we call it, it's X-Cities Standard Expectations. They're public bathrooms. You start smelling urine 20 feet outside of the bathroom. The company that gets this, they're coming out of LA to do it and its low price, low price wins with that particular city and they get what they pay for.

We've lost this bid This will be the third time we've bid on it, and we finally learned what's going on. If we want to clean for them, we're going to lower our standards to meet their price because that's what they're going off of so much to the point that we might not let our employees wear our uniforms. We might give them a different color uniform because we don't like to be associated with cleaning quality that's not there. But in order to get that business, that's what we have to do.

We're proud to clean for Carpinteria. We'r eproud to wear uniforms when we clean for you. But your staff know that and I think Michael said it very, very clearly. And as you value things so keep with best value whatever you're doing and all the other things but try to stay best value as long as you can not just low price. Yes? Oh, I'm so sorry. I'm Alan Williams. I'm with Big Green Cleaning Company.

The president and owner of the company have been doing this since 1978, so proud to serve at your pleasure. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:41

Well thank you Mr. Williams and thank you for being here. So

next item on our agenda is public hearing and I'll just ask for a quick 10-minute break and we will resume. The City of Carpinteria

2:08 – 2:133 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:53

The City Council meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:10:27

The City of Carpinteria

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:00

The City of Carpinteria Council meeting. ♪♪ You. You.

2:14 – 2:225 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:14:16

The City Council meeting. ♪♪ The City of Carpinteria.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:17:15

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:35

Hello all and welcome back to the Carpinteria City Council meeting. Today is February 23rd, 2026 and we will be resuming with item number 14 which is the public hearing and it is adopt resolution number 6435 approving the Measure A five-year local program of projects for fiscal years 2026-2027 through 2030-2031

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:18:03

Good evening Council. To provide some background on the Measure A local program projects, in November 2008 Santa Barbara County approved Measure A extending a half percent sales tax dedicated to transportation improvements. Measure A contains a strategic plan that includes local programs and projects that are funded by allocations to local agencies. Each year, the program projects must be presented annually at a public hearing and approved by a City Council resolution for submittal to the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments or SBCEG.

Measure A funds can only be spent on qualifying programs and projects that are described in the local program projects such as maintenance and construction of roadways and bicycle and pedestrian facilities Operation of the urban forestry street tree program, roadway drainage facilities and operation of traffic signals. The projected five-year Measure A revenues indicate a total allocation of $5.6 million, as shown on this table. This averages out to about $1.1 million a year with it increasing. So towards the fifth year it's 1.2 million but for the current year it's one million.

The Measure A revenue allocation by program is shown in this graph The majority of the allocation is planned to go towards maintenance, improvement or construction of roadways and bridges. This is about 54% or $3 million. And then the least funded program is the safer routes to school improvements which is typically handled by MOVE Santa Barbara. This is about 1% of the allocation or $56,000.

In addition to identifying programs, there's also a maintenance of effort requirement for Measure A. So Measure A requires a maintenance of effort expenditure of discretionary non-Measure A funds for transportation maintenance and capital projects. The City of Carpinteria's MOE requires an annual expenditure of $172,000 or more of non-Measure A funds. The City has historically used General Fund to meet this MOE requirement, but now also uses a combination of other sources including Measure X.

The Public Works Department does not anticipate any challenge meeting this MOE and will continue to monitor proposed city budgets to remain compliant with threshold requirements. Lastly, alternative transportation requirement. Measure A requires a minimum of 10% of each agency's measure allocation to be spent on eligible alternative transportation. This is a sum over the five years and it must be met or exceeded by the fifth year of the Measure A program, and every fifth year thereafter.

Alternative transportation projects can include maintenance and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Most notably for Carpinteria that would be the Franklin Creek Trail Improvements Project Reduce transit fares for seniors and the disabled. Help put Carpinteria or EZ-Lift. And education outreach programs, such as Move Santa Barbara County. Based on current measurary revenue projections, the City of Carpinteria's five year obligation, the 10% would be $563,000. The Public Works Department has estimated alternative transportation funding to be at about 19% of its total allocation for the current five-year period through fiscal year 3031, exceeding the 10% minimum by 9%. So staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 6435 approving the Measure A Five Year Local Program Projects for Fiscal Years 26-27 through 2030-31.

and authorize the Public Works Director to submit the Measure A five-year program projects to the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments. And with that concludes the report, we open it up to questions.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:22:20

Questions from Council? I just have one quick clarifying question. So we get a Measure A allocation that comes in every year and then we have the Measure A grant programs Some of that funding, not every year but it looks like every couple years. So what's the grant funding for? How is that different than the Measure A allocation?

2:22 – 2:2719 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:22:40

Through the Mayor... That component...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:48

Let's take one moment. We'll wait until their sidebar is over.

PresenterMaurice FisherSmall Business Administration Office of Disaster Recovery and ResilienceProposedself-stated2:23:31

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:17

Should we take a five-minute break? Would that be helpful? OK, great. Thanks.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:24:31

I could respond to the question in the meantime, I think it's probably unrelated. In addition to the annual allocation which is given to these cities or participating agencies should they meet the minimum requirements there's also grant opportunities and so you can apply for this potential grant funding and it's a competitive process unlike the item that's in front of you tonight which is guaranteed The grants are...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:58

I'm sorry. I think it does interact, so I'll just ask for you to pause answering the question until this is resolved on this end. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:25:24

Councilmember Clark through the mayor. Yes, I do recommend that you recuse yourself from this discussion out of an abundance of caution because of your position on the help board Thank you for bringing this to my attention

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:25:40

I'm gonna hereby recuse myself from participating in this issue.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:25:44

Okay? Thank you We can now resume

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:25:52

So two examples of the grant program were the Cycle 5 and Cycle 6 Safe Routes to School, where the city applied to request funding for the Franklin Creek Trail Improvements Project. We were awarded about $200,000 in Cycle Five and another $200,000 in Cycle Six through competitive process.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:26:12

That's

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:26:13

the other component of

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:26:14

Measure A. Okay thank you I just wanted a clarification since there are the two different Measure A funding streams coming in and I thank you for explaining that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:25

Any other questions from Council? No, no questions. Okay I will go ahead and open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:26:35

Mayor we have no raised hands.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:36

We'll go ahead and close the public comment bring it back to the council for any further questions and of course a motion.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:26:43

I'll move to adopt resolution number 6435 as read by title only and to authorize the Public Works Director to submit the Measure A five-year local program of projects to the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:26:54

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:55

We have a first and a second all those in favor? Aye. Any, um... Oh my goodness. Opposed! Okay great we will wait until Councilmember Clark returns Welcome back. Thank you. We will now move on to other business item number 15 which is selection of the 2025 City of Carpinteria Volunteer of the Year.

2:28 – 2:3426 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:28:12

Good evening Mayor Alarcón and Council. Tonight's item is the selection of the 2025 City of Carpinteria Volunteer of the Year. Every year, the City of Carpinteria recognizes one individual who has made significant volunteer contributions to our community and submits that recipient to the Carpinteria Community Association for recognition at the Community Awards Banquet. And this year that banquet will be held at Girls Inc in Carpinteria on April 18th of this year.

Following council direction from last year, staff updated the selection process to incorporate direct input from staff who oversee our volunteer programs. A staff committee reviewed nominations based on scope of service and community impact from the last year. The committee unanimously recommends Reinaldo Cardenas as the 2025 Volunteer of the Year. Reinaldo organizes and oversees the city's annual summer co-eds adult softball league at Viola Fields, independently managing league operations including scheduling team coordination umpires playoffs and awards amongst many other duties his leadership keeps this long-standing community tradition accessible welcoming and also successful Staff recommends that council commend this year's nominees. Select Reynaldo Cardenas as the 2025 Volunteer of the Year, direct staff to submit his name to the CCA and prepare a resolution for adoption at the April 27th-26th Council meeting directly following the CCA Awards Banquet.

Thank you, and I'm available for any questions the council may have.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:29:47

Questions? Yeah, well first I want to say thank you for explaining the new process that's staff-driven. I think that is a really great improvement from how we've done it previously because I know staff are so aware of all the different volunteer opportunities happening throughout the city. Can you tell us a little bit about how that change in process impacted how you got the names of people and just how that all moved forward?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:30:13

Of course. So we, this year we actually comprised of a committee including all staff members who oversee or have direct ties with any volunteer programs overall and so we all got together created you know Google Forms and just had folks submit names and then also just kind of a description of why they feel inclined that that person should be selected as the Volunteer of the Year After that, then we got together went through all of the names and then really talked through as a team kind of how we felt that these individuals exemplified you know stellar volunteer service. And then really came to a conclusion together so it was a lot more of a cohesive collaborative approach rather than us individually just nominating folks and then it coming here to council

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:31:04

No, I think that worked out very well and just for clarification because this is something I get asked sometimes so for this particular award for volunteer of the year what what is what are like the The framework for it in terms of the amount of time because I know some people think you know Is it something where it's commemorating? You know the years of service that someone has put in versus What what is the actual criteria?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:31:27

Sure, so we definitely commend years of service. Absolutely that's a really important key piece but really the focus here is to nominate an individual who went above and beyond in the calendar year of the year 2025. And so it doesn't mean that folks that have you know volunteered for 10 plus years can't be nominated. Of course we welcome that and there were some folks that were nominated That met that criteria, but really we're looking year to year of how folks go above and beyond.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:31:57

Thank you. Appreciate

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:31:58

that Any other questions No, I just I really appreciate this new process too. I think it's much more clean It seems like it was very thought thought out and very collaborative. So thank you for that I'll now open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:32:18

mayor? We have no zoom speakers

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:32:21

I will close public comment, bring it back to the council for any final questions and of course a

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:32:24

motion. Oh one final follow-up question so from what I understand there is going to be a presentation at a future council meeting so that Ray can be here to get the certificate is that right?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:32:36

That's correct. So Ray was actually here, but he had a softball team game so it was kind of funny that ended up working out the way that it did. So he's out playing right now but he will definitely be here at the council meeting directly following the CCA Awards banquet

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:32:56

Perfect. And I just want to say just on a personal note, I'm sure we can all say this because it's such a small town But I have I am thrilled that Ray is getting the award my daughters went to daycare with his daughters since they were babies and We you know, we love going to Rinaldo's bakery and seeing him there So he's just he has such a wonderful Part of this community and it's it's great to see him celebrated for the work He's doing with the softball league, which I know that league means a lot to the people who are involved in it So it's great choice

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:33:26

By the way The city used to also have a softball team to play Dave Durf from here myself and we had a full team out there

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:33:34

That did bring up a

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:33:35

thought for

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:33:36

me. I wonder if for our next

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:33:38

council meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:33:38

we

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:33:38

can just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:33:39

hear a little bit more about the softball league and how long it runs and The

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:33:43

individuals who participate

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:33:44

would be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:44

nice to hear Would anyone like to provide a motion?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:34:02

Yes, I move to commend Carpinteria Volunteer of the Year nominees for their service in 2025 as well as select and submit Reynaldo Cardenas as the Volunteer of the Year recipient to the Carpinteria Community Association on behalf of the City of Carpinteria. I direct staff city staff to prepare a resolution for Volunteer of the Year to be adopted at the April 27th 2026 council meeting. Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:34:24

We have a first and second, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? That passes unanimously and we will now

move on to item number 16 which is professional services agreement with Atlas Planning Solutions to complete the emergency operations plan and five-year emergency preparedness work plan for the City of Carpinteria

2:34 – 2:4111 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:34:48

Hi again, Mayor Alarcon and Council. Tonight's item is professional services agreement with Atlas Planning Solutions to complete a comprehensive update to the city's emergency operations plan and also develop a five-year emergency preparedness work plan. Tonight I also have Aaron with Atlas Planning Solutions who is online. Perfect! So he is available also to answer questions at the conclusion of the presentation The city's current emergency operations plan or EOP was last updated in 2014, so that was over 12 years ago. Since that time there have been significant changes in federal and state emergency management standards including updates to the National Incident Management System ICS and evolving guidance from FEMA and Cal OES. In addition our community has also faced new and emerging hazards such as large-scale wildfires, public safety power shutoffs, pandemic response and also coastal flooding to name a few of those hazards.

Best practices recommend that EOPs be comprehensively updated at least every five years so we are long overdue Updating the EOP ensures compliance with current standards, strengthens coordination with the Santa Barbara operational area and provides a clear roadmap for preparedness. In December 2025 the City issued a request for proposals and after a competitive evaluation process That included participation from regional emergency management partners, including Santa Barbara County Office of Emergency Management and Carpinteria-Summerlin Fire Protection District.

Staff determined that Atlas Planning Solutions was the most qualified firm based on experience, technical expertise and ability to support the city within our staffing capacity. The consultant will guide and support staff through a phased process that includes updating the EOP consistent with FEMA and Cal OES standards, helping conduct bilingual community workshops, providing staff training, helping facilitate a tabletop exercise and also developing a practical five-year work plan. City staff and partner agencies will remain actively involved throughout and retain full ownership of the final product before it comes back to your council early next year.

The proposed agreement is in an amount not to exceed $105,200 and while this exceeds the originally allocated budget of $50,000 Staff has refined the scope and incorporated efficiencies to ensure a responsible and realistic investment. The additional funds for fiscal year 2026-2027 will be brought forward as part of the midyear budget process at the next meeting.

Staff recommends that the council authorize a city manager to execute the professional services agreement with Atlas in an amount not to exceed $105,200. Thank you and again I'm available to answer any questions and we also have Erin from Atlas Planning Solutions with me as well. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:42

you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:37:43

Any

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:43

questions?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:37:45

Sure, I have a couple and then for staff and then for the atlas. So once the plan is updated how will the city communicate the results to the public?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:37:56

Sure, that's a really good question. So first and foremost the plan will come back to your council early next year before it is you know your council you know adopts it before anything is kind of set in stone and as a result of that we do plan on issuing a press release and letting the public know but really at the core The EOP is really how we as staff and as a city agency operate in the event of a disaster and how coordination happens. So it's not necessarily, it's good for the public to know but it's not necessarily what the public does but it's what they can expect that we will do on their behalf in the event of an emergency Really at the core of the five-year work plan and the workshops that come along with it, those are probably the ones that we're going to be pushing a lot more into the community as those are the ones where That community input is gonna be really crucial and pivotal not that that input won't be a part of the EOP It definitely will be but for the purposes of what the EOP is.

It's not as much Resident focus as it is the other aspects of the contract

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:39:01

That's no, that's very helpful. Thank you. And then how does this plan? I just mentioned a little bit in the staff report but how does it strengthen some of our regional emergency partnerships?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:39:09

That's a really good question. So as you know the plan is over 12 years old. A lot has changed like so much has changed we actually have old names and phone numbers In here that no longer those folks aren't with the agency. I don't even know where they are now So there's a lot that needs to be updated there, but also in the event of a large-scale emergency This is really our guidebook as to what exactly to do who gets contacted when? What processes are in place to really guide that so we're not building the boat as you know The storm is coming in We kind of know what to do and we have a plan in place And really that's crucial that also, you know as part of the process is really not just the city and the consultant putting it together. All other partners within jurisdictions are going to be invited as well.

So for example, the fire district, the school district will also be included some of our community-based organizations as well So a lot of different folks will be included at the table in the development of the plan. And then, you know, the County Office of Emergency Management plays a huge, huge role not only did they help score these proposals that we received but they remain active partners and making sure that our plan makes sense and is in line with You know, the Santa Barbara operational area as a whole.

And then also neighboring jurisdictions so we remain in close contact with Goleta and Santa Barbara in particular. And then also maybe including our partners over in Ventura as well because at the end of the day you know hazards do happen. Hazards don't just stay within city boundaries they do spread and so we want to make sure that we include everyone that could possibly be affected in this process

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:40:52

Great,

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:40:52

thank

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:40:52

you. And then I just had two questions for the Atlas folks. One is I want to understand more about what meaningful community engagement plans there are for this? I believe that there's one session that's planned at least for community outreach so if the representative can talk about what that looks like from their side of things.

2:41 – 2:4614 turns

CommentAaron Fannin-SteeleProposedself-stated2:41:16

Can you hear me okay?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:41:17

Yes

CommentAaron Fannin-SteeleProposedself-stated2:41:19

Well, thank you for the question. And it's nice to meet mayor and council members. My name is Aaron Fannin-Steele. I'm the CFO and founding principal of Atlas Planning Solutions. Part of this project which was a little bit unique in comparison to many of the emergency operation plan updates that we typically do for cities across the state Is that you really focused on an engagement process. That is unique to emergency operations plans, it's not a requirement and so we were very interested in relying on some of our other skills outside of emergency management to help the city with the community engagement piece.

So in addition to doing emergency management, we're also urban planners and we work a lot with planning departments. And in the planning process, we oftentimes will engage in community engagement activities and outreach. And so we're kind of relying on a lot of the experience and the practice that we've used over the years. But one of the core kind of tenets of how we do engagement is we actually sit down with staff, and we try to learn what has worked in the past, what hasn't worked in the past, and what you feel is working well right now within your community to really set the foundation how we want to do engagement for a community like Carpinteria. Because, you know, we can work next door and give you an option that may have worked really well for one of your neighboring communities but maybe it failed.

And so for us it's really about making sure that we understand before we jump in and start doing things. What we have right now is a plan to do two in-person engagement events. One in English and one in Spanish where we have a staff member Translation, working closely with city staff as well. But we're also very flexible so as we start the conversations with city staff if we start to recognize that there may be a better way to do this you may have some existing events. We want to try to capitalize on that. We really want to come out to where the people are and make sure that we're Giving them accessible information. And so for us, we're really a collaborator on doing what's best for Carpinteria when it comes to engagement and I hope that answers the question.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:43:47

No, I appreciate that. Thank you very much That's helpful to hear and somewhat related What do you does your group have experience with? Some of our regional partners at all or similarly sized cities or anything like that that would inform The type of outreach that you do

CommentAaron Fannin-SteeleProposedself-stated2:44:04

Yeah, so we're currently working up in solving right now starting a process with the city of solving. We recently completed some work with Santa Barbara County. I actually am a gaucho. I know Santa Barbara County fairly well. You probably hear and meet a lot of Gauchos coming through, but Carpinteria has always been a special place in my heart. It's actually where I proposed to my wife so it's definitely a community that we're enjoying coming back to help and support.

But we also have worked in large communities and small communities throughout the The Southland. We've done some work in some coastal communities where we're actually working in Malibu right now, which has got some similar issues going on that Carpinteria does as well and we're gonna really try to borrow from a lot of our experience up and down the coastline to make sure that what we're doing in Carpinteria really is meaningful and works well for both staff as well as for the community.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:45:13

That's great, thank you very much. Those are my questions and I appreciate the answer and appreciate you being here.

CommentAaron Fannin-SteeleProposedself-stated2:45:18

Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:45:21

Any other

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:45:21

questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:45:23

I just have a question only because we just recently discussed the emergency alert system that we joined with our county. So I think my question is how does this differ and how do they integrate?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:45:39

Sure. So the emergency alert system, so that is run through the county. So we work closely with the county staff to if whenever those alerts need to go off but that alert system does not belong to us I just want to distinguish the two there But we do work, like I said alongside with county OEM staff who issues those alerts. So that is a tool in the toolbox I like to call it for issuing public information so in terms of you know providing alerts to the public that may be referenced in the EOP as to when you know we may want to provide extra coordination with the county to alert our residents But there are two different things that EOP really is a framework for how we operate and what we do in the event of a disaster Whereas the ready SBC alerts has kind of baked in of how we alert the public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:46:35

Thank you Any other questions No other questions, I will go ahead and open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:46:47

mayor? We have no raised hands

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:46:49

I will go ahead and close public comment, bring it back to the Council for any final questions thoughts and of course a motion.

2:46 – 2:5530 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:46:57

I move to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Atlas Planning Solutions in an amount not to exceed $105,200. Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47:09

We have a first and second roll call vote please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Atlas Planning Solutions in an amount not t
Show transcript
Vice Mayor Solorzano? Aye Councilmember Clark? Aye. Councilmember Mayor? Aye. Council Member Nomura? Aye And Mayor Ellicott? Aye

We will now move on to the legislative update I actually think it's the program. Mine keeps

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:38

closing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47:39

Yeah, it does take a little bit for it to load The agenda is. There's only one bill that I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:47:51

want to... Excuse me, sorry about that. Mayor Alarco and council members there's just one bill that I want to provide an update to you all about this evening it's a recommendation to support Assembly Bill 1708 and this is in your packet so AB1708 is also known as the not that this is any shorter HHAP, Pathways for Cities Act. If passed, it would allow California cities that are under 300,000 residents to directly access homeless housing assistance and prevention funds if they meet certain accountability requirements such as adopting action plans and maintaining compliant housing elements.

The bill aims to create a more equitable funding pathway for smaller cities that currently lack direct HHAP access despite still having significant issues with homelessness and also trying to address those homelessness issues in their smaller localities. League of California Cities does support this bill and does ask other cities to also support the bill by sending a letter of support, so happy to do that if your council wants we'll take direction from you in terms of action

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:49:14

Thank you. Any questions?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:49:16

Yeah, so for this legislation are there funding sources that we would be applying for if we could but we can't because we're too small of a city?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:49:28

So that's a great question Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor I don't have all of those answers right now but this is what so far Yes, and there may be other sources but this is one of those types of sources which it would allow us access to HHAP funds. Okay got it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:49:50

I have a question um I am on the regional house homeless A task force, this is literally not what it's called. I'm on that committee and in our meeting last week they presented on how the state has cut funding for HHHE. And they had actually, one of the things we discussed was whether or not as a committee we would send a letter to the state. So I'm sort of wondering how this is a possible bill that provides funding but the governor has signed a bill that cut

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:50:35

the funding? So great question. I did just, I googled that quickly and so yes it looks like the state of California is proposing a reduction of really cutting the funding to HHAP in half what it's my understanding that the proposed bill 1708 I think it is yeah 1708 it wouldn't increase funding it would So currently that funding is available to larger municipalities and it's my understanding that this bill would also make that funding available to smaller municipalities.

Your point is a good one, that there's going to be potentially more municipalities or agencies that are able to apply for the funding unless funding available.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:38

Any other questions? Is there a desire for us to write a letter from the council, seeing some consensus. Yes. You

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:51:47

have full consensus.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:49

Okay. Do you need a motion? Are you, do you have direction? I'll take a motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:51:56

Great. Just because it is an action item on the agenda so yes please Mayor Alarcon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:52:01

Can I ask for a motion on the table please?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:52:04

Yeah I'll move to direct City Attorney to draft a letter of support for Now mine's being slow too. AB

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:52:14

1708. Thank you, Vice Mayor Solorzano. If I can just interject? Yes. I think the motion would be to direct the City Clerk to put together a letter and we're happy to assist.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:52:26

Perfect! Okay. I would like to amend my motion to request that the City Clerk draft a letter of support for AB 1708. I

CommentUnited StatesProposed2:52:34

will second that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:52:35

We have our first and second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? No.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:52:40

Great, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:52:41

We will now move on to committee reports inquiries and other matters presented by council members

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:52:48

I'll just say MTD board met earlier this week or last week and We received a second quarter review of fiscal year 2526 and also second quarter performance reports In addition to an update on the terminal 2 recommissioning project. It's going into phase two now So that should be it's moving along and it should be operational Not too long, so it's exciting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:53:14

I walked by it yesterday and I was very excited. It's really made big

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:53:18

progress. It has, hasn't it? So phase one is done so now they're going to be moving on to phase two. Cool.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:23

Do you have any update on the...I believe it's called the wave?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:53:25

Oh yeah! So that's one okay so we're definitely next in line for that. The Goleta pilot is still going on there part of the consideration that MTD is looking at right now is whether they want end the Goleta pilot and then start the Carp pilot, or if they want to just have a little bit of an overlap. They're thinking more along those lines, and they're thinking it probably would be in late summer or fall that it would come to Carp. But the results we're getting in Goleta are very positive. There's a lot of usage of it, and it's a lot of usage by seniors and by people who might otherwise have been using something like our shuttle. So I think so far it's going well, and it will definitely be coming to us this year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:09

Hopefully we get it for the summer. I know I'll keep pushing for it. Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:54:15

any other updates? The homeless committee the regional Homeless Committee and Housing Committee met last week, and I already did mention that we we discussed funding and you know What's happening and we had two state representatives there to sort of give sort of the grim? Reality of if this funding does get cut I mean it's a by half, and what it will do. What what are how and how our regional Programs will be affected expect especially considering that we're seeing a reduction in homelessness with so it seems like if words if it's working why stop it but It's always interesting because it's a regional board so our regional committee, so it's really interesting to hear from the different municipalities and what they're doing.

The city of solving and city of Santa Maria has a lot of really exciting Yes.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:55 – 3:037 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:55:37

Last month, I think I gave a brief report from SPCAG that there's going to be a new train. And so this last meeting, I got some more details on it. A train set was given to Losan. Losan is a inner city rail agency, they're kind of like Amtrak but they're not for profit which Amtrak is but they're just their inner city rail and so they got a train set and they want to use it to come up here.

They go from San Diego I think maybe up to San Luis Obispo or something? And so they don't really have anything here, so now they want to have this train do that. So SBCAG had a train before COVID and it came in the morning and went back in the afternoon but it was highly unreliable and it didn't get a lot of use because the train just wasn't there when it was supposed to and didn't leave when it's supposed to.

Now they've ironed that all out, so they actually have what happened before was they didn't really have an agreement with Union Pacific. Union Pacific just said okay you can use the rails but you have to take... You know, you have to use it when we're not using it. So when the Union Pacific train came through nobody could go. Now they've ironed out, they made an agreement that this train could go and Union Pacific's going to honor that They also got a lot of connectivity with other trains, so they've arranged the schedule. So all these trains from down south will meet with it for people who want to go up to San Luis Obispo and then the end of it's going to be in San Diego.

The train is going to get on carpet 730 ish, 715, 730 and we'll leave carp at 320 or 330 something like that. So anyway, it's a partnership between SPCAG and VTCT which is the Ventura County Transit Authority. And so we're funding it in partnerships so this is Measure A money. And they've worked out all this first mile, last mile stuff with all the organizations like MTD to get local street connections going.

But the funding's only good for a year and it's supposed to be picked up by the state after a year. So we got that report, everything's fine. Then we got a couple more reports from some guys who are consultants and they're lobbyists and one is for the federal and one is for the state. And so they go to all the state government meetings and the representatives there and lobby to get transportation money for Santa Barbara.

from the state saying, well, this is underlying everything we've been talking about just now. There's a $2 billion shortfall. So I don't know how this is going to affect your rail in a year although it was a state promise so who knows? We'll have to see what happens. But anyway, we'll have her for a year. And there's also discussion of Metrolink wants to come up here now.

So that would be a different train coming at a different time and leaving at a different time, so that hasn't been set up yet but that could possibly supplant this one if the state didn't come through or be an additional train. Anyway something is happening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:54

Great, thank you. Thank you for those updates Do you have any updates you'd like to share?

CommentUnited StatesProposed3:00:00

No Quick question for staff though on the committee reports inquiries and other matters presented by council members Is it possible to include an attachment on the list and the people that or the council members they're involved with those committees Just like we used to have with the old agenda

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:00:18

Council member Nomura I can certainly supply that to the council. Perfect. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:00:25

And I'll just add, I'm so happy there's two of us on those homelessness meetings because the other piece that has these are just the beginning conversations. It's, I think City of Goleta is kind of spearheading this ideas is creating an inclusionary housing ordinance or Individual criteria to receive first dibs after a development is built. So I think that's really interesting.

So maybe as they get further along, this is something that the housing committee can explore further if this is something that we can do in Carpinteria. But right now it just seems like it's just in its infancy and idea. The other thing I'd like to just quickly bring up, oh! I also attended the chamber meeting, the South Coast Chamber Meeting which is the public policy committee.

That was really interesting. It was hosted in Santa Barbara and there were a lot of Santa Barbara businesses, and I attended with the assistant city manager. But it gave a really good perspective about the businesses and how they work with the city, and of course how much of an economic driver those businesses are to the community. So I had some ideas that I spoke to Ryan about that maybe the Economic Vitality Committee can continue to explore And lastly, the first district supervisors report. They talked about cycle mania and granted that grant is due tomorrow, but I don't know if we have any thoughts or desires. I'm actually wondering if we already partner with move if that's something that they would be willing to take on. But of course it's so last minute that if they can't, they can't, but $700 or $700?

That's all I have. And attendance of council members for future meetings. Yes Everyone will be present and we will officially adjourn the meeting at 8 31 p.m

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed3:02:20

And mayor Alec on council members if I can just remind everyone that on March 16th, there is a special Joint City Council Planning Commission and ARB meeting and we will be presenting We'll be providing an update on state housing laws and recent legislation So just wanted to make sure that that was on everyone's calendar

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:39

Thank you The City Council meeting.