UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:04 – 0:0919 turns
To the Carpinteria City Council meeting. Today's date is August 24th, 2026 and I will request a roll call please.
Roll call, called by City Clerk
Show transcript
Great thank you. And closed session report
Thank you Mayor Alarcon. We were in closed session to discuss four items, two were for conference with legal counsel for existing litigation both cases of which are included on tonight's agenda and the other two items were for a conference with legal counsel for anticipated litigation and there's no reportable action this evening great
And then we will be continuing one of the items for after, well continuing one closed session item.
Correct Mayor Alarcon I understand that the council would like to continue one of the items under the conference with legal counsel for anticipated litigation to after tonight's regular open session items and so I think that should come up in the item on the agenda where its confirmation of agenda items
We have let's see public no not that one. Let's see here.
Yeah agenda modifications I'm trying to get there.
Thank you and we will now
move on to agenda modification of which We will move one of those closed session items too after our meeting this evening I just want to ensure there's consistent consensus among the council. Yes, yes And council member remarks. Yes. Excellent. Thank you We will now move on to introductions, proclamations and presentations. Item number four is postponed to the September 28th City Council meeting.
And
we will move on to item number five which is a proclamation recognizing and celebrating the 50th anniversary of the California Coastal Act. I would like to open up public comment on this item. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor we have no raised hands.
Okay, I will close public comment and bring it back
to the council for a motion. I move to adopt the proclamation of the City of Carpinteria recognizing and celebrating the 50th anniversary of the California Coastal Act
We have a first and a second all those in favor aye any opposed none The motion passes and we will begin reading the proclamation with Councilmember Solorzano
Whereas in 1972, the people of California approved Proposition 20, the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act establishing that the protection of California's coast and ocean is a paramount concern for present and future residents of the state and nation.
Whereas in 1976, the California legislator enacted the California Coastal Act and the State Coastal Conservancy Act creating a visionary framework to protect, conserve, restore and responsibly manage the state's extraordinary coastal resources while providing for carefully planned development and
Whereas the California Coastal Act established a unique partnership between the California Coastal Commission and coastal cities and counties, including City of Carpinteria through local coastal programs that balance local decision-making with statewide goal of protecting California's coast for the benefit of all.
Whereas the California Coastal Act has safeguarded public access to and along the shoreline, protected environmentally sensitive habitats, preserved agricultural and scenic lands, supported sustainable coastal economies, and enhanced the quality of life for millions of Californians and visitors.
Whereas the City of Carpinteria is home to one of California's most treasured coastlines where beaches, wetlands, coastal bluffs, agricultural lands and marine resources contribute to the city's environmental health, economic vitality, cultural heritage and community identity.
0:09 – 0:1515 turns
Whereas the City of Carpinteria is home to one of California's most treasured coastlines where beaches, wetlands, coastal bluffs, agricultural lands and marine resources contribute to the city's environmental health, economic vitality and cultural heritage and community identity.
Whereas the City of Carpinteria is recognizing the importance of continued stewardship of its coastal resources through collaboration with residents, community organizations, local businesses, regional partners and state agencies to address emerging challenges including sea level rise, coastal erosion, climate change, habitat protection and equitable public access.
Whereas the California Coastal Act continues to provide the policies and tools necessary to preserve California's iconic coastline while supporting resilient coastal communities and ensuring that future generations may enjoy and benefit from these invaluable natural resources,
Whereas the City of Carpinteria proudly joins communities throughout California in recognizing the lasting legacy of the California Coastal Act and reaffirming its commitment to protecting and enhancing the coast for generations to come. Now therefore, the City Council of the City of Carpinteria hereby proclaims 2026 as a 50th anniversary year of the California Coastal Act in the City of Carpinteria and celebrates five decades of coastal stewardship, public access, environmental protection and community partnership.
And we'd like to request for representatives from the California Coastal Commission who will accept the proclamation. Welcome!
Yes, thank you so much. My name is Jackie Phelps and I'm a district supervisor in the Commission's Ventura office and I'm one of the staff members that is fortunate enough to work with the City of Carpinteria. So yes thank you so much for honoring the 50th anniversary of the Coastal Act which is the visionary law that set the standard for coastal resource protection and stewardship.
As we all know, California's identity is profoundly linked to the enjoyment and preservation of its 1,200-mile shoreline. The California Coastal Commission is the agency that implements the Coastal Act to protect that shoreline so current and future generations can experience the incomparable beauty, inspiration, and joy of a healthy, vibrant coast. In the 50 years since its passage, the Coastal Act has proven to be one of the most effective and resilient environmental laws in the country.
Its strong resource protection policies have provided the legal foundation to preserve tens of thousands of acres of natural lands, create thousands of public access ways, and support a $51 billion ocean-based economy. However, none of this could have been accomplished without strong partnerships and collaboration with local governments like the City of Carpinteria.
Locally, the Coastal Act is carried out through implementation of local coastal programs which empower local governments to make decisions for their coastal area. In fact across the state, local governments approve about 90% of permits for development in the coastal zone. Nearly every section of coast enjoyed by the public today is the direct result of one or more of those decisions based in the Coastal Act. The trails are walked, the waves are surfed and the vistas are open for all to enjoy.
Looking ahead, the Coastal Commission remains committed to our mission of stewarding a healthy, resilient and accessible coast for all Californians. And we hope that celebrating past accomplishments will help to inform and inspire the next 50 years of coastal protection. So thank you all so much.
Thank you. Ms. Phelps, we'd love to present you with the proclamation and take a photo in the front.
Got it.
We will now
move on to item number six, which is a proclamation honoring the Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center's 25th anniversary. Oh
and Mayor if I can interject out of an abundance of caution, I will recuse myself from this item as I am now a member of the Carpinteria Arts Center Board of Directors. Great thank you.
From 2001 to 2026 and I will now open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips for this item. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
I'm here we have no raised hands.
Okay, I will close public comment and I will ask for a motion on behalf of the council.
So moved.
We have a first can we please have a second? I will second it. No issues with seconding so we have a first and a second all those in favor aye any opposed none motion passes and we will begin reading I will begin reading the proclamation whereas the City of Carpinteria recognizes We have a lot of proclamations this evening. Whereas since opening its doors in 2001, the Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center has served as a welcoming cultural hub in the heart of downtown Carpinteria dedicated to creating a vibrant community through the arts by providing opportunities for creative arts education exhibition appreciation and community gathering and
0:15 – 0:2324 turns
Whereas for 25 years, the Linda Farrelly Carpinteria Arts Center has enriched the lives of residents and visitors by offering diverse educational programs, exhibitions, performances, concerts, camps, workshops, and special events that inspire creativity, celebrate artistic expression, and foster lifelong learning for people of all ages.
Whereas the Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center has remained committed to ensuring the arts are accessible to all, providing scholarships community partnerships affordable programming and inclusive opportunities that strengthen connections among individuals families artists and organizations throughout the Carpinteria Valley
Whereas the Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center has become a trusted gathering place where creativity, collaboration and community thrives. Supporting local artists, encouraging cultural appreciation and serving as a vibrant venue for civic educational and community events
Whereas Linda Farrelly Carpinteria Arts Center has become a trusted gathering place where creativity, collaboration and community thrive. Supporting local artists, encouraging cultural appreciation and serving as a vibrant venue for civic educational and community events
Whereas Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center celebrates its silver anniversary, it continues to look forward to the future with commitment to expanding access to the arts, strengthening community partnerships, supporting artists and educators inspiring creativity for generations to come.
Now therefore, be it hereby proclaimed that the Mayor and City Council of the city of Carpinteria do hereby recognize and congratulate the Linda Fairley Carpinteria Arts Center on the occasion of its 25th anniversary celebrating a quarter century of service, creativity, education, and community enrichment. The city extends its sincere appreciation to the art center's dedicated staff, board of directors, volunteers Teaching artists, donors, members, partners and supporters whose vision generosity and commitment have made the Arts Center an invaluable asset to the Carpinteria community. And I'd like to invite Executive Director Christina Calkins up to the podium.
I am so excited to celebrate all of you with you on September 12th and Mayor, thank you for planning to come to that event to share the proclamation with the wider community. We can't quite fit everyone in our council here For 25 years, the Arts Center has grown and served more and more people in our community. And it actually started before it was a non-profit as a dream of some artists they created a gallery called Step One.
Because they knew it was just the first step in becoming a community arts center. And so thank you so much for the honor and I hope you all can mark your calendar on September 12th, we're going to have a very special unveiling of our teen mural project It involves black light and glowing paint. So our celebration will be in the evening from 5 to 8, so I hope everyone can come. And we're looking forward to the next 25 years and beyond. Thank you.
And there's several volunteers and board members that are here, if they'd please come up at this time to get a picture.
Thank you. And I just want to thank our city attorney for providing me with that guidance. I just want to be sure to appear as impartial as possible and not give any illusion of bias, so I want to make sure the community understands why I recused myself.
Thank you Vice Mayor Solorzano and thanks for being flexible there. Yeah, I didn't see you sneak back in.
We will now be
moving on to item number seven, a proclamation designating August 21st 2026 as Senior Citizens Day in the City of Carpinteria. I would like to open up public comment on this item. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via zoom?
I'm here we have no raised hands.
I will close public comments and bring it back to the council for a motion
I'll move to adopt the proclamation designated August 21st, 2026 as Senior Citizens Day in the City of Carpinteria.
Second.
We have a first and a second all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? None motion passes and we will begin reading the proclamation with Councilmember Solorzano.
Whereas the city of Carpinteria recognizes older adults as valued members of our community whose wisdom experience service and lifelong contributions have enriched our city and helped shape the welcoming connected community we enjoy today and
Whereas Senior Citizens Day provides an opportunity to honor the accomplishments, resilience and continued engagement of older adults while recognizing their important role in strengthening families neighborhoods in our community as a whole. And
whereas the city of Carpinteria is committed to fostering opportunities for healthy aging lifelong teaming learning social connection volunteerism recreation and community participation through its age well senior services program and
Whereas AGL Senior Services Program offers a wide variety of classes, wellness programs, educational opportunities, social events and nutrition services and community partnerships that help older adults including me remain active independent and connected.
Whereas the city celebrates the many volunteers, caregivers, family members, community organizations and staff whose dedication supports the health dignity and well-being of Carpinteria's older adult population. And
whereas recognizing and investing in older adults strengthens our entire community by promoting inclusion intergenerational connections and a high quality of life for residents of all ages
Whereas Senior Citizens Day is nationally recognized and provides an opportunity to honor the contributions and achievements of older adults across the United States.
Now therefore, the City Council of the city of Carpinteria hereby proclaims August 21st 2026 as senior citizens day in the city of Carpinteria. And I would like to ask program coordinator Jenna Jenkins to come up and receive this proclamation on behalf of the city.
0:23 – 0:4119 turns
City Council, Mayor and staff thank you so much. This is means a whole lot to me because we are talking about a population in our community that has the voice to speak up when something needs to be heard and they have the history of our community and they have the dreams for its future They have the wisdom that really only comes with time and experience. And they've got the spice that keeps us on our toes, you know who you are back there and here?
But most of all they have the passion, the passion that helps make Carpinteria what it is today so acknowledging them and our aging adults is so important to me so thank you so much.
I just would like to thank you for the proclamation, so well put. It encompasses everything that I had hoped seniors would be recognized for and I thank you for the Age Well program and I thank you so immensely for this lady right here who has done an incredible job putting forth programs, putting forth ideas and just making it all work. And I will never miss an opportunity to say again that i'd like to see a senior center brick-and-mortar building in the city of Carpinteria. I feel we deserve it as so many other communities have.
Other than that again thank you so much for the recognition.
It's definitely a team effort by so many people, but I have some of our wonderful Age Well members and I would love to have them come up for the photo if that's okay. All right Age Well members come on up or anybody
And Mayor I apologize we do have one raised hand that came in a little late. I believe it was for this item so I
Okay yeah I'm happy to open that back up and for this item.
All right we have Lisa Gervitz, Lisa go ahead.
Yes hi congratulations to the city and the age well program but I also wanted to give a shout out to Rory's ice cream for offering seniors free ice cream on Friday that was really a delight so thank you all. Thank you for your comments
Okay I will officially close the public comment section and we will now
move on to item number eight which is a presentation by the Christman California Island Center.
Hello Mayor, Council Members thank you so much for having me here my name is Taylor Vience and I'm the new Thank you for having me here, my name is Taylor Vians and I'm the new executive director of the Chrisman California Island Center. Some of you surely know our founder Marla Daly and I'm working closely with her but very excited to take the reins over there So As you know, in our backyard we have the Channel Islands.
Absolutely magical spot right here. I'd like to ask now if people have been out to the islands, but I will go on from that. Our goal at the Christman California Island Center is to provide a gateway to the islands, remove some of the barriers to entry whether that's time, energy or other resources. We have removed admission costs from the center and we are hoping to be more than just an additive Additive to the experience of going to the islands, but also to present an opportunity for people to experience the history and wonder of the islands who perhaps might not be able to make it themselves. Here we have a quick overview of the eight islands. I won't get into too much of the history, but I'd like to start at the beginning of the Santa Cruz Island Foundation.
That was founded by Dr. Cary Stanton and his assistant Ms. Marla Daly has taken the reins for the last 40 years, and the Christman California Island Center is a home to all of the artifacts and history dating back almost 200 years from the Santa Cruz Island Foundation. I usually also like to ask if anybody had met Dr. Cary Stanton before his passing, but I will keep on going on.
I like to ask this because it's quite an interesting trench of life, if you will. He was living like a Victorian gentleman out there on Santa Cruz Island all while overseeing one of the largest cattle operations in the county over 54,000 acres. All of his property and real estate there on Santa Cruz Island did transfer to the Nature Conservancy. It's still there as a closed nature preserve, however his personal effects have transferred to the center and all those can be seen there on the corners of Carp and Linden.
So here we have the Christman Center. Has anybody been to the Christman Center before? We've been open two years and it's in the old Bank of America building. I know it had a life as a bank before that. Fun fact, that was the most robbed bank in Santa Barbara County while it was open. We've only been there two years but I'm happy to report we have had no robberies.
So here's a picture of the outside of the center. You'll notice a beautiful mural by beloved local artist John Wolbrint there on the outside. We are open from Wednesday to Saturday and the archives are open by appointment, very accessible. Admission is free come one come all. So, it's important to state that our focus isn't only on the Channel Islands right here off our coast. We consider all California islands including the Baja Islands and then also the Farallones up north. So we're home to 500,000 objects, books, archives spanning almost 500 years of human history and admission is free. I like to mention that a lot. We are an educational research center as well. Obviously, we have these beautiful galleries and each has an exhibit to each separate island but also part of our mission is to forward research as well as the preservation of history in California Island's history so whether that's from prehistory, we have relics from the Chumash period, we have Juana Maria, the lone woman of San Nicolas' donut stone That's original, we have some pygmy mammoth artifacts and then we also have a huge amount of artifacts from the ranching and human history on the island.
As I mentioned our archives have over 500,000 items. Original things dating back over 200 years with the lone object going back 500 years. And that is all available to our community by appointment. We have permanent exhibits on each of the islands, as I mentioned. We also have a gallery of Richard Diebenkorn paintings. We have 33 on view out of our 43 in the collection.
These are seminal and very important to California history. He was friends with Dr. Stanton quite interestingly and painted many things while he was out on the islands. We also have an Island of the Blue Dolphins exhibit that's very friendly for all ages. Foundation produced in 2016. We have webcams live on all of the islands, which is very fun to see how things are going out there and then a full ham radio station set up. Right now we have a marine debris exhibit done in conjunction with CSU Channel Islands and we will be having an opening on October 9th. I invite you all to come.
I'm pointing out some select collection highlights here. We have the last surviving bottle of wine made on Santa Cruz Island, which is quite interesting to see. We have a lot of worked abalone from the ranching history time whether that's cufflinks, bolo ties, buttons, cutlery you'll see and a lot of the ranching equipment. Some incredible examples of leather work done on Santa Rosa Island proper We also have a native plant garden in our courtyard.
We have benches of each of the islands that are to scale and relative to their size where they are, you can find many endemic species that only grow out on the islands there in our courtyard which is a great way to wet the palette and get excited about what you will see out there if you get the chance to make it out there. And we also have a space for community activities, presentations, events please inquire.
We also are looking to invite members of our community to get involved, whether that is just to come through and see what we have. We also have opportunities for private tours, educational events, community speakers or Tocents if anybody would like to come and get involved in that way. We are working on increasing foot traffic right now, so please tell your friends and I will leave some materials here on the table as well as my business card if you would like to follow up further. Thank you very much for your
time. Thank you for the presentation and just before you leave I'll ask if any council members have questions? Mr. Baines, I think we might have some questions for you from the council if you can come on over to the dais. Thank you and thank you for your presentation.
Actually, not a question but thank you for coming back anyway. I just wanted to thank you so much for presenting this information. I think that it's a great way to get the word out more to the community. It sounds like you said the admission is free and then what were the hours again?
That is 10 to 4 Wednesday to Saturday. However if there is no response from the community that we'd like to expand those hours we're absolutely happy to.
Great okay thank you and just again thank you for sharing more information about this resource for the community.
Absolutely! We're proud to be a part of the Carpinteria Community.
Any other questions from council members? Okay seeing none thank you so much for your presentation. And I'd like to open up public comment on this agenda item, I don't have any speaker slips do we have any one via zoom?
We have no raised hands
okay I will close public comment and we will move on to the presentation of the Carpinteria community pool fundraiser kickoff
Good evening, Mayor, Vice-Mayor and Council. I'm really excited to be here this evening to officially kick off the fundraising campaign for the Carpinteria Community Pool Project. I also have with me our two aquatics coordinators, Lexi Persoon and Caleb Pina who I sincerely thank for just running the pool so fabulously each and every day, the Junior Lifeguard Program, The Beach, and helping with this project and the fundraising.
So we've talked quite a bit about the pool over the last year or so, but tonight I wanted to give you just a quick overview of where the project stands, what still needs to happen and most importantly introduce our community fundraising campaign and how people can get involved. Just as a little bit of background for those who may not know, this project really started in spring of 2025 with the facility needs assessment. From there we issued a request for proposals, brought 19 six architects on board earlier this year and this summer they recently completed the schematic design.
What we learned through this process is that this really is an infrastructure project There are certainly some things people will see when the project is complete, but a lot of the work is the not so exciting but very necessary stuff that keeps a pool functioning. This includes the pool deck and gutters, mechanical equipment, chemical feed systems, the pool heater and accessibility improvements including restroom improvements and American with Disabilities Act shower ADA shower.
The pool has served this community for a long time and the goal of this project is to make the investment now so that it can continue serving the community for many more years. So, where do we go from here? Schematic design is complete as I mentioned but there's still quite a bit of work between where we are today and construction. The next steps include design development the creation of the construction documents review through the division of state architect and health department permitting bidding construction and ultimately the project closeout I do want to emphasize what is noted on this slide in the bottom right, it's the timing and ultimately the scope of the construction are contingent upon funding.
That's really why tonight's fundraising kickoff is so important. Here you can see a tentative project schedule. Currently 19-6 is in the design development phase and will soon begin working on the construction documents. The plan as it is laid out right now would put construction beginning at almost exactly one year from today, and again I cannot stress this enough the project scope and therefore the timing are again contingent on the funding. If we are not able to raise enough funds to complete the project in its entirety, we may need to scale it down, do the project in phases which would shorten the closure of this construction but would result in additional closures down the line when funding was secured to make the additional improvements.
Before I talk about the public campaign, I want to recognize that we are absolutely not starting at zero which is just incredible. We have already had some incredibly generous community members and foundations step forward to support this project. I want to recognize the Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation, The Bliss Family, The Ann Jackson Family Foundation, The LaCentra Summerlin Foundation and Marilyn Jenkins for their grants and donations to date.
I'm incredibly grateful for their early support. Having people willing to invest in a project at this stage gives us a really strong foundation as we open the campaign up to the broader community, and I think this also demonstrates how important this pool is to the community. And that brings us to Keep Carpinteria Swimming. Our fundraising goal is $3.3 million, and we have partnered with the Santa Barbara Foundation which is serving as our 501c3 fiscal sponsor through the CARP Fund.
But rather than talk through everything on this slide I'm going to hop over for a moment to the website and see what we have been working on. I apologize I did not cue this up sooner. So here at keepcarpswimming.org you can see the history of the pool, vision and upgrades, contact and some FAQs. I want to acknowledge this design was made by one of our lifeguards Danny and we appreciate his contribution to this project as well.
Here funders or anyone rather can click to donate today and this will take you directly to the Santa Barbara Foundation link And then we will be updating our goal as it progresses and include any updates on the project as well. Here you'll be able to see some of the items that are in need of the repair, this is pool deck, stairs, the diving blocks, the worn tiles and the worn And finally, as part of the campaign we put together a short video that I think does a much better job than I can of showing what community pool means to Carpinteria and why this project is so important. So I will play that brief video for you right now.
For over 30 years, generations of Carpinterians have grown up swimming in this pool. But this pool did not happen overnight. It took years of hard work, community support, fundraising and grant funding to bring it to life. Today it's where kids take their first strokes, seniors find their rhythm and neighbors come together every day.
0:41 – 0:5513 turns
This pool means a lot to me I grew up swimming here at the age of eight and I've been able to go through these programs. I started with swim team and then transitioned into high school swimming and it's just been one of the greatest stories of my life.
But after decades of use the pool needs critical upgrades to remain accessible and open This pool was built by the community. Now it's our turn to protect it for the next generation. Just like before, we can't do it alone. If you're able donate today spread the word and join the effort to keep Carpinteria swimming. You'll see a lot of familiar faces there of staff who are current staff who grew up swimming in pool including our very own Lexi So we are really excited to finally share this campaign with the community and starting tomorrow, we will be getting the word out more broadly. There is obviously a lot of work still ahead of us but I'm excited about where we are and incredibly grateful to everyone who has already helped get us to this point.
And with that, I am happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. Questions from Council?
In terms of the donation structure, is it basically anyone can donate any amount or is there a threshold that what people need to donate?
Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor absolutely anyone is welcome to donate any amount and we would be incredibly grateful
And then in addition to the donation link, will there be other fundraisers or for example from what I recall there were plaques at one point or names that individuals in the community could purchase and put their name on the wall. Is that something that you all are
considering? Yes, Mayor Olicon. Yes it's definitely something we are considering. I recently reached out to the original artist of the tiles that are on the donor walls as they exist right now. Unfortunately have not been able to hear back so I am looking for an artist who would be able to match the style, the font, the color. It's very specific so that it's you know a cohesive look. So if needed we will be launching the tile or fundraiser if you will for lack of better term We're also working on selling some t-shirts for additional fundraising, possibly doing events at the pool that could solicit donations at them. We have a lot of ideas that we've kind of been talking about to go along with the different seasons to bring people to the pool see what's going on perhaps do a community day which was a wonderful idea brought to us by One of our water aerobics instructors to bring people to the pool, not just to see what programs we offer but also to see what this project's about and what is the pool renovation will look like.
Great thank you.
But
definitely more to come. Any other questions from council? Okay no questions I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips on this item. Do we have anyone via zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands.
Okay I'll close public comment and I'd like to just say this is a great way to kick off this campaign thank you for all of your hard work I know this is quite a big undertaking and I'm looking forward to see what else comes out of this and it's nice to see that we have three hundred and fifty thousand dollars to get it started Thank You okay we will now
move on to item number ten which is the first district supervisors report Welcome Daisy.
Good evening Mayor Alarcon, Council, staff, public hello okay I am going to circle back to housing the housing update and I'm gonna start with the cannabis updates so there is a new cannabis odor complaint and testing dashboard that the county rolled out. It's a map with identifying locations of cannabis odor complaints and nasal ranger testing, and there's a lot of mostly in real time up-to-date information about where this cannabis that cannabis odor complaints are coming from and what the testing looks like so definitely check that out.
Community members again can always report those complaints through the county website So those links are in the update. The next thing I wanted to mention was Winter Storm El Nino Prep. The county is aware that it's coming and we're all reading the same reports that everybody else is, so they're rolling out a bunch of campaigns across the county North County South County to inform residents about what they can do to be prepared and what the county is doing to be prepared.
Residents are encouraged to figure out if they live in a flood zone, pay attention to the weather forecast, definitely sign up for ReadySBC alerts And then do some home maintenance, folks. Clear your storm drains, clear your gutters, move important things to higher ground. Know how to shut off the water and the gas and electricity at your house. There are a lot of links and checklists on the county website, and I dropped a lot of those links in this update. So there's a County Storm Preparedness website That's countyofsb.org slash PW for Public Works, pw-storm-preparation. And that will kind of be the home base for all this information but one thing that I wanted to emphasize is that there is a real time data from Santa Barbara County Flood Control That includes live basin cameras that are updated all the time so you can see what the Santa Monica Basin looks like and what it's doing.
And it's currently dry as a bone, but it has been raging in the past. So definitely check that out. You can see real-time rainfall, real-time water level gauges. The hydrology section of the county website is pretty impressive, so definitely have that bookmarked if you like to look at that stuff during floods. Okay like I said please register for SBC ready SBC alerts and there's links on there about sandbag locations and availability as well seems kind of insane to talk about during this heat wave but it is good to be prepared Another thing I wanted to mention is that most homeowners insurance does not come with flood insurance, flood damage insurance. So the National Flood Insurance Program website it is administered through FEMA but there are programs available for people to apply for flood insurance so that's property owners renters and business owners So you can check that out, the National Flood Insurance Program website.
And on the website it says that these policies can take up to 30 days to go into effect so check it out now if this is something you're interested in. All right, some upcoming opportunities for residents. 3CE is the Central Coast Community Energy Program and they can help community members reduce their energy bill, assist with some home energy efficiencies and coordinate financial assistance programs. So if you're a Southern California Edison customer, which would be everybody here, you can contact the 3CE folks about those programs at southsupportat3ce.org Again I put the links in this update so there's a lot of information on the website you can look at too The last fun opportunity is Poetry Out Loud. It's a national competition, but it's facilitated through schools so it's essentially like a spelling bee but it's for poetry reading and it's for students so the local high schools can Organize this program they have until September 30th and students who do not have the program in their own school can contact the County Office of Arts and Cultures to learn about how they can participate as well.
And I did want to shout out that the Santa Barbara County champion from 2021 and 2022 was from Carpinteria High School, so I think it's time we brought that back here Alrighty, and some upcoming Board of Supervisor meetings that I think are items that are of interest to the Carp City folks. On the 25th tomorrow our new County CEO Jana Peterson will be there she's just starting she took over from Mona Miyasato so Jana is starting her first board meeting tomorrow so if you want to tune in and see what she's like Tomorrow's a good time to do that. And then on September 1st, there's going to be an El Nino preparedness presentation by County Flood Control so A little bit what I talked about but much bigger and more countywide That'll be put on by the County Flood Control Department and that will that meeting will also have a utility scale solar amendment that is being voted on this is something that is all about how are we bringing more solar to Santa Barbara County.
Initially, utility scale solar which is 30 acres or more was confined to the Cuyama Valley. So this solar amendment is about expanding that and thinking of all the different places and the new acreage that we can use solar within the county. So it's something that Director Bob Roth and Mindy Fogg have been in touch with our office about, and with County Planning and Development about how to notify Carp City when there are projects on the edge of the county and the city, and what that would look like for notifying and whatnot. So that's a big deal.
That's what's being voted on so if anybody is interested in the future of solar in Santa Barbara County tune in on the 1st of September next Tuesday And then the last thing that's coming up is on the 15th of September is The phase out of County oil and gas so the board Voted to begin the phase-out of what county of what oil and gas looks like in Santa Barbara County?
And it will probably be a many many many years Phase out but the first hearing on that is September 15th. So for folks interested in The future of oil and gas in the county tune in Okay, I'm gonna circle back to housing There there's no project application for what's commonly referred to as Van Wingerden one and two over at the high school nothing to talk about there The project at Cravens Lane No update. They're the applicant is addressing feedback on that project so The Baylor project which I assume is what we have this great crowd for that is still being put together by the developers. So, Red Tail is the developer of that place and they submitted an application on the 1st of June and on the 30th of June it was deemed incomplete by the county so it is an incomplete application.
They are predominantly addressing access issues. So that is what they're addressing I have seen Next door. I've been sent some posts and there are there is a lot of information in those posts that are Great questions, and that's what these developers are figuring out How do you have a development with only one entrance and exit? You don't so they're figuring these answers out right now They are working with the county. They're working with the fire department. They are working with The city, so that is what's all being addressed right now. So part of the reason that the project hasn't really come to light yet is because it's not really good enough yet.
Okay good we're on the right track. So just to be clear there are kind of three components to who weighs in on this project. There's the county Where the project is being made, or where the project is being built. And the county is the one that holds the decision on the building and what the building structure looks like and how it operates and the safety of that. The city, I don't want to speak too much for what the city does but my understanding is that the city handles the city side of the development so That's the streets, that is the infrastructure that would provide to this department or to this development. And then the third entity is the HOA, Casitas Village, that lives right there and Casitas Village is working with the developer...
I don't want to say working with.
0:55 – 1:019 turns
I'm sorry. So, I'm just going to interject real quick and I will ask the crowd to not interject or say anything while we have a speaker. Everyone will have an opportunity to make public comments so I will encourage you all to do so but in order for us to get through this presentation and hopefully get to your questions, I'll just ask for some... I'll request no commentary in the background. Thank you.
working with was the wrong terminology. The developer is responsible for interfacing with the HOA, specifically over the Pandanus Alley roadway section that is the responsibility of the HO and Redtail to work through that. Team has met with. The HOA, some of the board members has met with the general manager and has met with the HOAs lawyers a couple times.
Our office has been in those meetings mostly just to listen but those meetings have happened so I would definitely suggest anyone that's an HOA is a Casitas Village resident to reach out to their HOA board and to their general manager to chat with them about What you want to see coming up. So that is those are the three entities, the county, the city and HOA something that we have heard a lot about in this room and that council member numerous brought up a number of times is impact fee sharing so How is it that the county can collect the development impact fees on a property that all of the infrastructure will be coming from the city? Great question. We have never really seen this. We asked planning and development at the county if there's an example of this in recent years, and the only one that they could recall was a project out in Goleta.
So it really has not happened in the past. I'm happy to say that on September 17th, the city reps and county reps will be coming together to discuss what that looks like. What would the impact fees be as best as we know? What would the mechanism be for that? The developer is not part of that discussion because they don't need to be because they just have to write the check so they will not be part of that discussion. So the development impact fee sharing We've heard you, and we are working on it.
The last thing I wanted to mention is that the county website for these development housing projects is not very navigable. They are very technical, and you have to dig into Acela, and it's difficult to navigate and understand what the status is, et cetera, et cetera. So Director Bobroff and I Mr. Ramirez, we have discussed how we can be a little more transparent so we're going to put information about this project on the city's website and we're gonna make sure that we've got the plan, the architecture plan that was submitted, even though it's not up to date. But that will be the plan.
We will have the evacuation study that was done and we will have the traffic study that was done. So we'll put those up with a list of frequently asked questions. I think that'll be helpful to try and get some of this written down in a kind of layman's way to explain it And I will definitely be taking notes to incorporate tonight. Um, I'll be taking notes tonight to incorporate a lot of the answers to a lot of the questions that I presume will come up tonight. So, um, that is my update on everything.
Does the council have any questions?
Any questions from council before public comment? Okay. No questions, but there will be, I'm sure.
I'm ready.
Thank you. Yep. Thank you. Okay. We will begin public comment with Mr Carl Sanken welcome.
Thank you, Mayor. I am Carl Sanken. I'm a resident of the Casitas Villages. I am a relatively new resident of the Casitas Villages and I'm seeing exactly what this Red Tail project is potentially going to do to us. The access, the amount of parking. We don't think that the parking that's included in the project will prevent cars from leaving the project and trying to fill our streets which are already oversubscribed.
The emergency access, we fear there's going to be or at least I fear there's going to be another Palisades fire evacuation. Limited streets and limited ways of getting out of the project it's not going to be good. Having said all that, we look forward to having more meetings and we would definitely like to be part of the meeting that's coming up between the city and the county in September.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you
Miss Betty Jepson.
1:01 – 1:086 turns
Good evening. My name is Betty Jeppesen, I'm here speaking against the proposed Red Tail development. This project was originally rejected by the City of Carpinteria which actually sent the city administrator and assistant to Sacramento last year to speak against it and submit a 75-page report to the California Coastal Commission about why it should not be built. I know that because I sat through six hours of that It is only one, it has only one fire exit via Baylord which would also be used by all the residents of Villa Del Mar as well as 280 units at Casitas Village. In an attempt to remedy this the project threatens to take take a portion of Casitas Village land, which is private property and they dare to keep calling it Casita's Pandanus Alley.
Let me make this clear. It is not a city street. It is a driveway. It belongs to Casitas Village. It is the only way for people who live on Birch to exit their driveway and get out So, it is not Padenas Alley. It is not a city street. It is the Birch driveway. That's it and everybody keeps calling Padenas Alley to make you think it's a public street. The project would add excessive amounts of cars to an area that is already lacking in sufficient parking and in which people are already parking in fire lanes when street parking is exhausted and this happens every night I drive through the Casitas Village alleys to get out and it is like a slalom course. They park right in the fire lanes.
That's before this is built. The meetings with the developers, we have heard them say Well, an emergency will never happen. We don't have to worry about that. Well that's simply not good governance. Emergencies do happen and government representatives like you good folks need to protect our residents in the event of a fire which we have had many that have resulted in evacuations from Casitas Village, people need to be able to get out. We have heard that in that case each unit is only going to take one car. That's what the developer says but that's simply not so. In the event of a fire each person old enough and able to drive a car will take a car with as much personal property as they can possibly squeeze into it in the time permitted This project is out of scale to the area and will wreak havoc on the infrastructure of Carpinteria City, including fire police and utilities.
Look at what it's going to do to your utilities and should not be allowed to proceed. Thank you. Thank you for your comments.
Mr James Nichols? Welcome.
I would just like to add to what Betty said. My name is James Knuckles, I live on Baylor Avenue in Casitas Village and before I start I'd just like to say there was already an evacuation order issued in 2017 and people were trying to evacuate Casitas Village and Villa Del Mar because of the fire in 2000, the Thomas Fire so that's already happened. So okay So, good evening.
I'd like to address the grossly inadequate parking of the proposed Red Tail development at the end of Baylord Avenue. The Baylord Avenue evacuation assessment that was prepared on behalf of Red Tail shows that the Red Tail development will have 196 units with 297 parking spaces with no street parking. That works out to 1.5 parking spaces per unit And that's grossly inadequate.
In comparison, Casitas Village has two parking spaces per unit with considerable street parking and in the evenings the street parking is completely full. Villa Del Mar also has two parking spaces per unit with the same considerable street parking and in the evenings their street parking is also completely full. These streets where the parking is completely full include Baylor Avenue, Birch Street, Hickory Street, Poplar Street, Pandanus Street in Villa Del Mar, Palmetto Way, Jacaranda Way and both sides of Via Real.
The parking is saturated because there are three to four cars per residential unit And there is no reason to believe that the situation will be any different with Red Tail. If the Red Tail development averages only two cars per unit, Red Tail will be short 100 parking spaces. That's 100 cars parked or forced onto surrounding streets where the parking is already full.
If the Red Tail development averages three cars per unit, Red Tail will be short 300 parking spaces. That's 300 cars forced onto the surrounding streets where the parking is already completely full because of Red Tails inadequate parking hundreds of additional cars will be forced to try to park on adjacent streets with a parking is already completely saturated.
The parking This parking nightmare will be a disaster. The Red Tail development will force hundreds of people, will leave hundreds of people with no place to park. So what happens when hundreds of people can't find parking? Well they have to move somewhere else where they can find parking. People simply can't live there if there's no place for them to park
We're over time. Mr. Knuckles, if you could take the next 10 seconds to finish your comments please?
Okay. All right. Rentail... all this is because Redtail won't provide adequate parking for their residents and this leaves all of... well, Redtail takes their profit and they leave all of us with the disastrous consequences to deal with later And this is why I'm against red tail, the red tail development. And this is why you should be against it too. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. Tristan Rainer. Tristan Rainer welcome.
1:08 – 1:143 turns
I'm a resident of Casitas Village, and I'd like to tell you about our condo complex which was built as worker housing and is mostly Hispanic. The people who live there all most the vast majority have trucks and cars so that they can go to work in Montecito and clean houses so that they can go to cottage hospitals and clean rooms and serve patients, and do gardening jobs in our area and other essential work. They leave early in the morning all at the same time.
They come back in the evening When they come back, they are tired and they need a place to park. Right now it's almost impossible for all of them to park. They get ticketed, they get fined, they get notices from the HOA. Can you imagine what is going to be like when there are an additional 500 possibly cars needing to find parking places. Our people, because they have multiple families who have thrived in our community by everybody getting along with each other and being kind to each other, they work with each other now When you have an apartment complex, and by the way these are not condos. These are apartments being built. Don't confuse that when you have 197 apartments built 35 of which will be affordable housing.
You are not going to have the peaceable community that has been there and the thriving community where many generations because it's so expensive to live here now, live in 847 square foot apartments. That's the size of them and there are sometimes three generations living in that same space. They do it because they make the best of the situation but there is such a thing as a tipping point and this development will be that tipping point. I want to mention something else Our supervisor, when he was running for office we asked him about his opinion about this development. And we feel misled because he told, he represented that he was against it.
Some of us met with him privately before he went and voted for the development as our supervisor one of his first acts. We were also told by Daisy who was at that meeting That within two months, there would be town meetings. There would be information given to the residents. None of that has happened. It has been impossible for us to get information. Now we have seen a report that was given to the police department- You're over time, so I'll ask for you 10 more seconds to wrap up please.
That report is inadequate and misrepresentative of the entire situation and an independent report not paid for by the developer needs to be done.
Thank you for your comments. Cindy Marcus, welcome. Cindy Marcus?
Hello thank you I'm Cindy Marcus. I am an owner at Casitas Village. My condo faces the Birch Alley. Birch Alley is private property. I want to stress that it is not a street. It's not a city street. Redtail they think they can just come and take private property That alley is the driveway to the unit that I own and all the units on Birch Street. All the garages face that alley with all those, if there were an emergency exit and people had to get out of there nobody would be able to get out they couldn't get out of their garages, they couldn't get out of their driveways it's very dangerous.
I also want to say that you know i'm really disappointed That the city opposed that project and now all of a sudden they've turned around and they're misrepresenting what the project is going to do to that complex as well as all the streets that go in and out of that area. There's all the units at Villa Del Mar, there's 280 units at Casitas Village. And now you want to add another almost 200 units?
The safety of the people who live there is at stake. And I've heard people, I'm also on the board. I've heard people complain that they couldn't get out during the 2017 fire and the congestion was terrible. So the fact that they're saying there's never going to be an emergency, there has already been one. So I really want to stress that this needs to be dealt with.
And if the city can now talk to the county and tell them, this project should not be there. It needs to be in another place. The developer needs to stop lying about what the situation is. We have had numerous problems with people parking in fire alleys Rogelio Delgado, welcome.
1:15 – 1:206 turns
Rogelio Delgado, I live on Baylor Avenue. I own a condo since 1998. I have come to City Council meetings and complained about the development. I complain with the school board about that development because I was there With them, I remember when this was brought to our attention back in 2017. Transaction was done for $4.2 million. Now it's reclosed last year on this development.
It's under general fund for $1.2 million, and that's been used to compensate the sex abuse victims of the 70s. To me it's a done deal. It can be delayed for lack of access year or two, but it's a done deal. The parking, I have complained before you three or four times. Right now try to find a parking space right there. You won't find it, you won't. There's 545 units, Casillas Village and Villa del Mar condos.
Indeed two parking spaces per condo and count the parking spaces. Not enough. One question that I have, because the developer didn't even have to use the builder's remedy, no. The reasoning was approved by the supervisors and by the coastal commission. So that meant a done deal. I understand it's, I'm mad. I've been mad for nine years. Thousands of letters before this becoming a fact were put aside by the Coastal Commission.
The reason was it had new members and they were not aware of the whole act, so thousands of letters that had been written by people Just ignored, thrown away. And only a few letters went through and the postal commission moved here in Los Angeles to Sacramento so that fewer people could attend. Once again it's sad, very sad thank you.
Thank you for your comments Mr. Delgado I do not have any other speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands.
Okay so I will close public comment and I will ask Stacey if she'd like to answer if you have any potential updates or maybe summarize some of those concerns and I will give the council an opportunity to ask them questions if they have any
Sure, yeah. Thank you for all the comments everybody. Thank you. I'll work on getting a lot of those frequently asked questions out. I heard a lot about access and emergency access. I heard a lot about the evacuations and the plan for that And how that would be addressed. I heard a lot about parking and what kind of parking solutions there could even be for what's currently happening.
So I appreciate everything and the understanding of the ReZone and Builders Remedy versus ReZone. So those will just be a portion of the frequently asked questions that we will work on getting out quickly onto the city website. I think it'll be helpful to have it on the city website Well,
so it sounds like there's going to be is it a link to the project from the city website? Because I also want to be sensitive to not residents not thinking. It's a city project.
1:20 – 1:2814 turns
I think it's just helpful to the city has a great section on their website with I think people are pretty used to looking at that but that'll be There'll be links to all the county pages. That will have things there'll be contacts for folks at the county that will answer all these questions and we'll make very clear our what the City of Carpinteria is looking at versus what the county looks at.
So that'll be clear, so it is graciously being hosted by the city's website and honestly if you feel that that's not the best place for it I would love to hear that as well so we can find another spot.
And then for some other folks that have comments that were either not able to make it here today or who want to say more where can they direct those? Roy Lee at
countyofsb.org
Yeah, Daisy great job. Thank you for working on that development impact fee that's going to help us a lot show us concession one of the Suggestions I would have I wouldn't say recommendations about suggestions at this time is to maybe see if in fact we can develop that committee that subcommittee at SP CAG to talk about Negotiating how these projects will come forward in the future I know we're talking about one right now that's impacting Baylor, but we have a number of other ones with potentials for even more coming into those same regional areas with the same challenges that we're going to be facing with this one. So if you get surrounded literally surrounded um with county projects, we need to have some sort of guidelines on how those are going to be addressed handled.
This is not going to be just parking but it's going to be all of the above. We're also looking at the overall impact if we end up doubling Yes, I agree. And just as a reminder to everyone
The reason we are in this situation is because the state of California created a housing mandate in the early 2000s. And so for up until 2031, Santa Barbara County and the South County has to put in 4142 units in unincorporated South County. In Carpinteria City it's 901 units In Santa Barbara City, it's 8,001 units in the city of Santa Barbara. The grand total for our county is about 25,000 units.
No one asked for this. Not one person here asked for this. This was pushed on us by the state. I'm with you Councilmember Nomura that we've got to figure out how to live harmoniously with these 25,000 units that are being shoved into Santa Barbara County.
And don't forget this is also just an eight-year mandate it's gonna change again another six years five years?
That's right so there are efforts to tackle this at the state level but right now We, as in the county, as in the cities. The eight cities in Santa Barbara County and the county itself are grappling with 25,000 units and what does that look like? And who's gonna park here and who are those 25, 000 units going to be housed for and by? Hopefully it's locals. Hopefully it's people who already live here and it's their kids and their parents.
That's what we're hoping for. That's what we're working towards So I appreciate this suggestion and I will work with SB CAG to start that housing subcommittee and just hopefully get that going. I think it was a great idea
So, thank you and then Councilmember Clark anything on your end? Nope. Okay one thing on my end um, I do feel as though there are a lot of times where this where I I should speak just for myself, our hands are tied when it comes to this red tail project. And I think the council as a whole along with the city has written letters. We've gone to Sacramento but oftentimes we hear issues from constituents that we can't necessarily address and so one thing that I heard in those comments was The desire or need to speak with our elected official, our supervisor. And so my request also is that he do some sort of a town hall to work with his constituents around this and I think the other thing that I want to make really clear and Councilmember Solorzano mentioned is that this is not a city project however And I will look to the city staff now because there is from my understanding a portion that will come to the City, to the Council in terms of it might be in terms of the egress ingress and so I will look to city staff if you all can provide us with what that will be when it comes to the council and just where we're at with the project in general.
What I don't want is the impression is that we have a lot of say even though we're at the table with the developers and the county, but I will look to staff to see if you can provide a summary please.
Mayor Alarcon, sure I'd be happy to. So you're correct that the bulk of the project the actual project itself is located outside of our jurisdiction and is within the county's authority however elements of the project primarily vehicular ingress and egress so the access to the site and the utilities that would serve this site need to come through the city and so Redtail will ultimately need to apply for Some limited permits from the city to improve that access and to run those utilities through our city streets up into the project site.
And then they will also need to come to your council specifically to request an easement from the city to gain their vehicular access for their driveway site. I don't have a timing for when this is going to occur. We've been in talks with the Redtail team and tried to map out, you know kind of what we see as being the steps in the process but they haven't yet submitted an application.
Okay
great. I just want to finish off by saying I love the idea of a town hall, we will absolutely have that meeting. Similar to how we don't know the timeline at the city, we don't know the timeline at the county. We're waiting for the project. Supervisor Lee has said, I don't want to have a town hall meeting without a project that has even the basics of what is being asked Like emergency exits, etc. So that is part of the reason there hasn't been a town hall on this these updates have kind of served as the Update thus far but I think it's clear that there's more questions and so we will try and push the developer to Give us something that we can present with and hopefully bring them along so they can answer all the questions except
One quick idea follow-up to that is I hear what you're saying that the supervisor Lee wants to wait until there's more information But it sounds like the residents already have a lot of feedback that they want to give So having a town hall even before all the other ducks are in a row For those supervisor to hold the Town Hall here in Carpinteria would I think would make the residents feel more heard? Even even before the project is submitted Great, thank you.
All right well thank you for your presentation and I appreciate all the residents for coming down here tonight and making your public comments known. Thank you. We will now
move on to item number 11 which is the city manager's report
1:28 – 1:3817 turns
Thank you Mayor, Council and community members. As always I'd like to say that the City Manager's Report we highlight it here in our verbal report but don't cover every single detail and encourage people to look in there. There's also some helpful links for those that don't use... Also from our earlier presentation on the pool for those who don't use YouTube often and know that those closed captions are done by YouTube we do know how to spell Carpinteria YouTube that did all of that, not us. But with that I'm going to turn it over to our Assistant City Manager Ryan Kentz to go over a couple items.
Thank you Michael.
Good evening Mayor and Council Members so yeah quick update on our current recruitments. So we currently have four active recruitments underway accounting specialist slash accounting technician building official engineering technician and management analyst. The accounting specialist position is moving into the skills assessment phase, which we conducted this morning.
Interviews are pending for building official, engineering technician and management analyst. And then I do want to clarify that none of these are newly created positions or additions to city staffing. These are all existing previously budgeted positions that became vacant as a result of staff departures, and we are now working to fill those vacancies. Additional information on these vacancies is available on our website and I'm happy to answer any questions.
Looks like there's no questions, thank you.
Yeah and i can give an update on the capital projects give me a moment to pull that up So Carpinteria High School area crosswalk safety improvement projects. So construction of that project is ongoing we did do some work last week to set it up so that it was safe for the start of the school year, so that work is done and then let's see The temporary striping for the new crosswalk was also installed and there's some additional work that will be done including installation of the conduit and poles for the high-intensity activated crosswalk. That's the HAWC system, and then we'll be removing some of the roadway plates, the roadway paving, and then finally activation of the HAWC system and final striping so that's all work that's pending likely will occur over the next couple weeks.
Happy to answer any questions on that
I think that was my question is in terms of when it'll be done, but it sounds like a few weeks so soon.
The goal is within the next several weeks. I can't give you a firm deadline because we're have some additional delays this week But the goal is within the next couple weeks
And then what are what are some of the delays that have happened? What has attributed to that?
Yeah, happy to answer that question. So some of the delays are due to our coordination with Caltrans and we're working within their right-of-way. They do have certain requirements that we need to meet and after inspections that are done by Caltrans they did identify some work that wasn't within their standards and they requested that we update that work and ensure that what were within their standards.
Okay thank you.
Yeah, a question for you there Ryan on this one or suggestion. We know that a lot of the roads right now are going through I would say development redevelopment trenching for CAP, the CAP project. I notice there's quite a few of the busier streets for example Linden by the school area there and also along Foothill where the lines have disappeared completely and i've seen quite a few instances where cars are veering around having no idea where the lanes are going to be. So suggestion would be maybe we could talk to the CAP project, the contractor and see if in fact they could put cones out at least during work time so that you know it's going on especially during school time.
Councilmember Nemour that's an excellent suggestion I'll transmit that information over to the project managers. Thanks.
And I'd be happy to support that also yes thank you
With that, I'd like to next have our Community Development Director Nick Bobroth give some updates on development applications.
Thank you, Michael. Good evening again Council Members. I've got just three updates here in the City Manager's Report for you this evening. First off, I wanted to share that Chevron has recommenced onshore decommissioning activities within the Carpinteria Oil and Gas Processing Facility so they're back to work there on the onshore facilities. Currently they're doing some pre-demolition abatement work in some of the structures that are to be demolished And then they're also starting in on demolition of some of the inground structures and piping.
Once those structures are removed, they'll be able to do a more thorough assessment of site conditions to help determine the extent and scope of soil remediation activities. We also expect that the limited beach work to separate the onshore pipelines from the offshore segments of the pipelines, that previously was going to occur in the spring but was postponed is likely to occur sometime this fall. So Chevron's still doing some coordination with state parks on that to gain access to the beach through the state park campground but we're hoping that'll be in place again for those cuts to be made this fall.
I also wanted to share a little bit about the Santa Barbara County Flood Control's Carpinteria Salt Marsh Routine Maintenance Program. This went to the California Coastal Commission back on August 13th, and the Coastal Commission approved a permit to allow this program to move forward. Essentially, the program would allow for periodic dredging and removal of accumulated sediments from the Carpinteria Salt Marsh in order to maintain the flood capacity of the salt marsh. And it would also allow for the periodic opening of the salt marsh mouth to the ocean to improve tidal flushing and the water quality within the salt marsh.
The program allows for beach-appropriate sediments that would be removed from the salt marsh to be deposited in the Carpinteria surf zone, either through use of a slurry pipeline out through the mouth of the salt marsh. And then it also allows the option for trucking of beach-appropriate sediments to Ash Avenue where it could be deposited into the surf line.
Understanding that this is sensitive for the community, Coastal Commission worked closely with County Flood Control and the City to develop a suite of mitigation measures and conditions that are intended to make sure that these sediments that are deposited in the surf zone in Carpinteria are safe from contamination or Contamination standpoint, also that they're of the appropriate makeup and size so that we're not getting a bunch of the cobbles and boulders like we've seen with some of the emergency sediment placements in the past.
And then also some ongoing monitoring to make sure that the sediments are actually creating a beneficial impact to the community. This is something that Flood Control has been working on for quite some time It's kind of on a as-needed basis, so while this permit was just approved we may not actually see flood control do this work for several years until the need actually arises.
But again the Coastal Commission did work closely with us and included coordination and permitting obligations with the City in Flood Control's path forward when they want to do these events. And then finally, I just wanted to share that we have tentatively landed on a date for the Surfliner Inn project and the accompanying final environmental impact report to be considered by the city's planning commission.
That date has been set for special meeting on Monday September 21st at 7 p.m.. So this is a little bit later than normal but it's a single item meeting that's the only item that will be considered on that agenda It will be similar to a normal meeting and that'll be held here in the council chambers. It'll be live broadcast, folks that are interested can participate in person or via Zoom or submit written public comments ahead of the meeting and it'll be live broadcast on television as well and through the city's YouTube page We anticipate that the final environmental impact report will be made available to the public at least 10 days ahead of the hearing. We expect that it'll actually be out sooner than that and that the staff report would be published no later than Thursday, September 17th.
And again we're targeting to actually have the staff report out sooner than that but that would be Kind of the deadline that we have to fall back against. And we'll have all these staff report materials and the environmental impact report up on a city website as soon as they're available. That concludes my City Manager's Report items, unless you have any questions for me?
Thank You. Questions? Will there be hard copies of those reports also available at City Hall?
Mayor Ellicott, we can certainly make the staff report available as a hard copy for folks. The environmental impact reports are pretty hefty documents so I don't see us having printed copies of that available for the public to take home but we will have a printed copy available here at City Hall and a printed copy available in the library if folks want to go there and take some time to read it. Of course it'll also be on the city website.
Great thank you
1:38 – 1:437 turns
Thank you, Nick. And Mayor I wanted to add an item that is not in the City Manager report but has been promoted in our social and want to just remind folks that next Monday August 31st at 4 45 p.m. at Veterans Hall the city will be hosting its State of the City event Town Hall, where we will be discussing mostly the city's fiscal position. Questions will be both live and pre-submitted. And questions can be pre-submitted at communityinputatcarpinteriaca.gov Again, community input at CarpinteriaCA.
Spanish translation is available as well and will be live streamed on Zoom and YouTube. Formal presentations will begin around 5 30 p.m at 4 45 p. m we'll have tabling and people will be able to come up and meet with the different departments and their council members. With that I'd like to invite up our program manager for sustainability and environment to give an update on what's going on in that division.
Thank you. Good evening, Council. I just have a quick update on the most recent Living Shoreline project outreach event. On July 29th, tribal community members met with city staff and the project's consultant team from Integral Consulting and Strategic Earth. The meeting was closed to the general public and provided an opportunity for tribal community members to share guidance on meaningful tribal engagement throughout the projects planning and design process.
Participants also offered perspectives and ideas to help inform the development of the Living Shoreline project. Key areas of discussion included meaningful tribal engagement and stewardship, incorporating Chumash cultural knowledge and perspectives, and protecting and restoring natural resources and exploring nature-based approaches to a living shoreline. The knowledge and perspectives shared during the meeting are invaluable, and will be considered as part of the projects moving forward.
Future opportunities for general community engagement and project updates will be shared through the City's newsletter, social media, and the Living Shoreline Project website. Thank you. If you have any questions I'm happy to answer. Looks like no questions. Thank you.
And lastly I'd like to bring up our Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director Jeanette Gantt to give some other community updates.
Good evening again Mayor, Vice-Mayor and Council just a couple updates for the Parks and Recreation Community Services Department. Age Well will host its Dia de los Abuelos event on Friday August 28th from 5 30 to 7 p.m at the Veterans Memorial Hall this free family friendly event for age well members will celebrate and honor the cherished abuelos and abuelas in our community Agewell members are also invited to a free Saturday excursion to the Carpinteria Valley Museum of History located at 956 Maple Avenue on Saturday, September 5th from 1pm-2.30pm. Participants will tour the museum's new exhibits highlighting the history of our local coastline.
For the community garden, the garden hosted an all-member volunteer day this last Saturday, August 22nd from 9.30 to 12 p.m., members came together to weed and mulch garden pathways connected with fellow gardeners and supported the ongoing care and maintenance of the garden. And there were approximately 16 volunteers that joined and they filled an entire dumpster with green waste so it was a really successful event and I believe they said most volunteers stayed for about an hour and a half longer just because they were so energetic and into volunteering, so it was a really great event.
And for aquatics the city's junior lifeguard program recently wrapped up its second session and another overall successful summer session and they hosted their swim paddle run triathlon on Friday August 7th this event gave participants an exciting opportunity to put the skills strength and confidence they developed through the summer to test in a fun and challenging competition And this year the triathlon featured both the junior lifeguard category but also an opportunity for their parents to participate and compete against the junior lifeguard instructors, which was really fun. We will have our aquatics team back to your council in fall to do the after summer report for you all.
I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.
Like no questions thank you.
Mayor that concludes my city manager report
Great. Any questions for the City Manager? Okay, I will open up public comment and we have a few speaker slips. The first one is Alan Koch. Welcome.
1:43 – 1:505 turns
Meeting. Council. Staff. Want to make a comment about the Surf Line to End project on the 21st okay You know, in my 10 years here I've been watching that project go from an RFP in August of 2017, LDDA signed in November 2021, approved application materials out August 2024 and now we're getting to a planning commission meeting. I have some concerns about that. First of all, I'm not sure why Nick said tentative.
Maybe that's because the meeting is not even on the city website yet but I just need a clarification why it says tentative because I know how difficult it is to try to get everybody together for one of these big planning commission meetings and this is a big one because this is very different just considering the scope of this project, besides the EIR. Then we're going to see a final version of that which started I believe June of 2025. There's also, I believe, a conditional use permit if I have the information correctly from Nick's department there that needs to be approved because city parking is going to provide parking for the hotel Besides that, we have the normal phase one. The new parking lot referred to as Lot 4 needs to go through a consistency review and then we have the hotel itself that the developer is building on Lot 3 and those plans are well known and they already went through the ARB approval.
I'm just thinking about starting at 7 o'clock assuming you're going 25, 30, 40 public comments before you even get to the... agenda. I'm not sure what a certification of an EIR, how long that takes for the planning commissioners and then we have the complex project. I just don't understand why we're not breaking that up into a couple pieces unless the intent of staff here is to continue it through until one o'clock in the morning or two o'clock in the morning so It's too important of a project for the city to try to think that we could do it within one meeting that starts an hour and a half later than normal meetings start. So, that's my comments, my concerns.
Thank you for the opportunity.
Victor Garza?
Good evening, Mayor and Council. I'd also like to talk about the surf liner. This morning I shared with you an email that I received from the California Public Utilities Commission where they were addressing some safety issues regarding the proposed parking lot 4 Back in December of 2024, I shared publicly my concerns with the design of the parking lot. It was a long narrow dead-end parking lot with no dedicated turnaround within only the only entrance and exit on an arterial road on Linden Avenue And having been a parking professional for 20 plus years of the city Santa Barbara, I know that That kind of design at peak hours is going to create gridlock Which is then going to cause queuing out on the street which could then cause queuing across the tracks so unfortunately my safety comments were not well received and I also understood that at that time, nobody had reached out to the railroad about the project and how it might impact the railroad or vice versa.
The EIR process was underway in June of 2025. The railroad sent, or CPUC sent a letter to the city pretty much echoing my concerns about the location and the way parking lot four is set up. Since then I've been asking the railroad and city staff if there's been any response to that letter that the CPUC wrote. This morning, I did get the answer and it was that in July of this year there was a meeting and a new plan was submitted for the parking lot.
And the plan shows one entrance only on Linden and an exit only out onto Elm. which seems to address the safety issues. So my question is, my understanding is that staff doesn't have to or it's not legally required to share the plans and the revised traffic study with the public but I'm also not aware of any plans that prohibits them from sharing that with the public So my request to all of you is to direct staff to make that revised plan and revised traffic study available to the public now so that we can take a look at it and see how it differs from the original plan.
And so we have time to understand it, then comment on it later. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. I do not have any other speaker slips for this item. Do we have anyone via Zoom? Oh for this item? I'm sorry. No, this is still for item number 11. We're almost there though. Do we have anyone via Zoom for this item?
We do. We have two raised hands Mayor. We have one is Lisa Gervitz. Lisa go ahead.
1:50 – 1:5710 turns
Hello, I'm also commenting about the meeting for the surf liner and I was hopeful that actually would be a tentative date because that's actually the first day of Yom Kippur. And I know that the city several years ago put a lot of time money and effort into a whole program about diversity and inclusion and I'm hoping this was just Innocent oversight to not choose the most sacred of all Jewish holidays throughout the of the whole year as The date for this meeting and maybe please take that into consideration before you finalize the date Thank you.
Thank you for your comments
And the next speaker is Andy Patrick Andy go ahead
Thank you. Good evening, Mayor and Council members. I'd like to talk just briefly about the strategic plan with all due respect because I know that there's been work put into it. It seems a little bit of a checkbox strategic plan to me meaning that the boxes have been checked so to speak public meetings were held community input was gathered A little bit goals were named, etc. But making choices establishing priorities and defining measurable success has from what I can see it been avoided I've written a lot of strategic plans in my days, and the plan that I see explicitly says its goals are not prioritized.
Many objectives rely on words such as enhance and strengthen and develop and explore without providing any baseline, any measurable target, any deadline or any clearly accountable individual. So it's a little bit of a rah-rah document. From my perspective, that makes the description of the City Department's intent to work on rather than a strategy for what Carpinteria most needs to accomplish. For example like just one quick example expanding engagement with Spanish speaking residents is an important goal yes absolutely but how much improvement are we seeking and by when? And how will we measure this? Whether residents are informed and participating in being heard. So there's none of that, it's just kind of like this statement.
It seems, well I don't know the same question applies to fiscal sustainability. It's what measurable financial condition are we trying to achieve by June 2027? It's not stated it's just that will, you know, I feel like Jimmy Stewart or somebody is there, Jimmy Cagney wants to put on a play all of a sudden, it's like this rah-rah thing. So anyway, I respectfully ask that the council add a simple accountability Appendix that identifies for each major priority the responsible person, the deadline, the required resources, the baseline, the measurable result.
And the city should then provide residents with a quarterly dashboard of some sort showing what is on track? What's at risk? What's delayed? Why? How can we help? You know, I don't expect all of this to fall on you City Manager and your staff. I mean, you have an entire city that wants these things. That's why the city should be involved in the details of this strategic plan.
So to me it checks boxes with measurable outcomes and accountability gone. So anyway, I ask for your attention to that and I appreciate it. Thank you very much.
Thank you for your comments.
And Mayor that concludes zoom comment.
Okay, I will close public comment and bring it back to the council for any questions or follow-up items Seeing none. Okay, I do have a question. I just want to I know we received a lot of public comment in terms of the tentative date for the surf liner in the EIR for September 21st So I just want to ensure that was that We looked at all other alternative dates Possible so if you guys could just walk me through your process to ensure that that really is The best potential date For the city that we were able to come up with
Mayor Alarcon, yes. Thank you. I've got Mindy Fogg up here to kind of help since she was instrumental both in helping get the project ready for Planning Commission and trying to help us find a date that works for all of the parties that are necessary to bring this project forward but I will just Kick things off by saying, you know. Yes, we went through an extensive exercise to try to find a date that matched up for City staff the planning commissioners themselves the applicant team and their various representatives when the council chambers was available when the TVS V folks were available to do the broadcast And and we were really struggling to find a date that aligned for everybody within about you know, I want to say a month You know so several weeks on either side of the September 21st state that we ultimately landed on and That ended up being the only date that everybody said they were available for You know Mindy might have some more to add there but but that's really in a nutshell We really tried to exhaust every other option before ending up on that date
Thank you Yes, I think Nick basically said it all and for the person who called in you know we wanted to make sure that we tried to avoid Yom Kippur as best as we could. It does run from nightfall on the 20th until nightfall on the 21st and our hearing does begin right after sunset on the 21 If we do go forward with that date as a caller said it is still tentative Because we did a courtesy Save the date to all interested parties ahead of time We don't usually book a date, you know a month in advance, but we do want to get those materials out soon so we are looking to do that within the coming weeks and To give everybody plenty of notice And if someone does need some additional accommodation because they are observing that holy day, we do want them to contact staff.
They can contact me or any of our leadership team and we will do everything we can Help them get their comments heard if we need to read their comments aloud at the Planning Commission Or make a time certain for them to be able to comment. We would be happy to do that as well So we welcome that opportunity Great,
thank you Okay Any other questions or comments? Okay. We will now move on to public comment on matters not on the agenda and We will begin with Mr. Carl Sonkin
1:58 – 2:045 turns
You know, I hope I'm not being a pest here. But I was going to also as far as Yom Kippur is concerned yes that's right it ends at sundown but people will be having been fasting all day they will be breaking the fast so it could be Problematic. The other problematic thing that I wanted to address was that if the current situation goes on with Red Tail, and we're talking about many several hundreds of cars, and then we're talking about a fire evacuation...
Really frightened that those several hundred cars are going to join several hundred other cars from the Villa del Mar and the Casitas group. And we're talking about a huge group of vehicles attempting to get away from a fire. And so I think that when you talk about or when you think about access, or when you are faced with the issue of access and leaving. You've got to consider that it's going to be a huge number of vehicles all leaving at the same time to try to escape the flames and that is going to be difficult. That's basically what I wanted to offer. Thank you.
Good evening again. My comments are related to a document that the applicant delivered at the board retreat, the UCSB Santa Barbara Economic Forecast Project associated with the Surfliner. I took an opportunity to go through that and I sent out my public comment, I believe yesterday And I'd like to just get a high-level summary of what's going on here, because I think it's another step in the final step that we need to take. Okay? In the sense of validating the potential revenue streams from the surf line being built directly to the city.
TOT tax, lease payments and sales tax, incremental sales tax. So my first finding related to the economic study is that's a very sophisticated economic model that shows the potential economic impact locally, county, state, federal. Okay? And I took a screenshot of like table three, the economic impact for the entire project in Santa Barbara Well the direct impact, the first level which is really directly to the city.
What's important to that model is the employment number of people that are being employed because it takes the payroll of those people and then runs it through their model which in the sense of that payroll will be used to spend money. So then, you know, that's just neither here nor there as to what we're trying to ascertain here. What's the revenue in light of our structural deficit problem that we having with our budget? So when you look at table three in total $67 million. Wow big number big number it's just it's just you know, it it's not related to really What we need to do here. We be you know, we being you know The citizens the staff Okay and and getting the right information back back to the council as to what what numbers should be should be shared So that was my first overall finding that it's not just I'm not not an appropriate kind of model And yet the other thing they have here is when you look at the summaries It's six years So it looks, I don't know why they didn't use 10 years.
They would have had a bigger number to be facetious a little bit. So that was one point. But within there, they did do a TOT tax kind of a study and that was on page 17. And the first caveat there was we're doing this study outside of the economic model that I just referenced. And page 17 has a calculation done by them. And they use some estimated room revenue numbers, okay? Just give me another one minute I see my clock is up. And that came out to like close to half a million dollars a year, okay? That is on the developer's website. So the sales tax one couldn't find really anything there So, my closing in the sense here is that during this process which is after the development review process, after Nick's department it goes back over to Ryan and Michael.
In the sense of closing out the LDDA and getting into position that whether we're going to sign a general lease for 55 years. We still need to have those conversations and we still need to validate those numbers, okay? Thank you for your
comments.
Especially in light of if the 1.4 million is reliable during the council's effort about the structural deficit that should be out there as an opportunity. Thank you
guys. Thank you. Tristine Rainier
2:04 – 2:115 turns
I want to again address this recent study of traffic and safety. that Red Tail had done, and that they have submitted to the fire department who they've been communicating with about allowing training for the fire department to go on there. The fire department has not spoken with the residents. We have not had any input into this. However we did see an incomplete copy of that safety and parking report.
And that was paid for by Red Tail I want to set give you some red flags here. I've done some research on Red Tail development and apartment management company which is a national company very large they have many many lawsuits against them They also have an F rating from the Better Business Bureau. You can look it up, red tail management complaints. It's the same company, same address as our developer.
It leads me to believe since there are so many complaints there about tenants saying they were lied to not getting their money back Slum conditions in their apartment buildings. Cheating people, not allowing people who are in Section 8 to live in them. It leads me to question how reliable this report paid for by Red Tail is and I'm wondering what we can do To get an objective report written, can the city commission that? This begins our costs for this development.
What do we do? Does this simply go to the county? The county accepts it. That's all that's necessary. I don't know how this works, but I'm very worried that we are getting involved with a company that we are going to have continuing problems with in terms of How reliable their reports will be. And I have to say that I am so disappointed in Daisy. She did promise us that within two months we would have meetings with Redtail, with the developer, with the supervisor. She has heard The things that she said she heard today and when I tried to explain to her the parking situation, she made a personal attack on me. She said you must be a very negative person Now I.
I'm sorry you're over time so if you can take the next 10 seconds to finish your comment please. I am uncomfortable
with this report and I'm asking City Council what how we get a more objective report.
Thank you for your comments. Betty Jeppesen welcome.
Hi. Um, thank you very much mayor and city council members. I want to say that you have more power than you think. In fact, you are the last bastion against this developer. You don't have to accept the permits. You don't have to grant the easements. You can demand reasonable return of information. You can demand what is reasonable for your citizens. The um, The developer is going to develop this, take his money and run. And what are we doing this for? 196 units, 35 of which are going to be affordable. That's only 35 units. The other 161 units are astronomically expensive. And the developers have been told that's fine because you have to use those units to pay for the ones that are economical. So, we're only talking about 35 units here. It is reasonable for you to make a demand for things that are necessary for the safety of the citizenry and if it becomes too expensive for the developer he will go away so you have a tremendous amount of power and you should please use it.
You know, Red Tail Developer came to the city first they were rejected then they went to the county and now I understand that once they get where they want to be They're going to ask the city to annex them, so that they are in the City of Carpinteria by the back door. And I don't think that a link to the Red Tail development should be on the city website. It shows too much that you are in favor of it.
It's like Daisy said, we met with the developer and we're working with them. We are not working with them! We are trying to defend Our driveway to our people who live there. And also I want to tell you that Casitas Village and Villa Del Mar, they are the workforce communities. The people who live at Casitas Village are as Justine said gardeners You know, workers who need economical housing. We are still the least expensive two-bedroom condo in the county and that's why they have lots of cars. There are... we have allowed five people per unit and so they have five cars because they work They have to get there. And what happens is, in the past those people moved from Casitas Village to Villa del Mar because Casitas Village is a two-bedroom one bath unit structure and Villa del Mar's a three bedroom.
I've witnessed that from my own unit, and that's what they do. But this development is not going to be for the workforce. It's going to be 35 units for the workforce and 161 units for the very wealthy. And it should not be just pushed through. Please...I was on a committee once with someone who said very appropriately, please don't just rubber stamp this. Thank you.
Cindy Marcus?
2:11 – 2:1711 turns
Betty just said what I was going to say is that you don't have to approve their easements if they're going to be using city amenities and you don't have the money from them to create these things. You do have a lot of power, and I was wondering why aren't you using it? You know, because this is going to affect the city of Carpinteria. And the developer doesn't care and they're going to take their money and run.
And you know I just don't understand why the people that are running this city have our account, you know, bowing down to them and letting them do things that are going to affect the city of Carpinteria majorly. And, you know, unless you know that they're going to be putting up the money for the infrastructure, for more roads, for more whatever it is that you need, you know, You shouldn't be just rubber stamping this and saying, oh okay we have to approve this. You do not!
You need to find out how this is going to affect the city, what it's gonna cost, where is the money gonna come from? And if you're not gonna get answers to that or the money or they're not gonna have the exits that they need to make it safe for the residents, you need to say no to their easements That's what I think. I don't know why you can't. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. Rogelio Delgado?
Thank you, Rogelio Delgado, Carpinteria resident I have in my possession the Measure 1. On June 22, 2026, Carpinteria City Council voted to place a quarter-cent sales tax measure now known as Measure U and that would be for street and roads, public safety, parks and programs, fiscal priorities I wish that it could have been written in Spanish as well. It says on the second page, way at the bottom, Para leer el folleto en español visite, it's the city's website.
Came back to the comment. On November 3rd, people will vote in support or against the 0.25% sales tax increase. Staff, city council members, community all have to do a better job at reaching to people to support that increase. Remember what happened last time? The landscape services lost. Use all social media available to you. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Coastal View.
Don't forget Hispanic people. Reach out to them in Spanish. They can make the difference. Use social media quite often. Sometimes people get a message after the six or seven times that they read you or see you with your message. The second point on housing, indeed there is a state mandate for housing in Carpinteria. However the mandate doesn't state that the bluffs are included.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. However there's no defense against a builder's remedy and that's why the bluffs on the 18th story building on Logan Street in my opinion are facts Projects will be delayed for years, but I think that nothing can be done. Can anyone inform the community how to stop a builder's remedy? How? Because they've been avoided. These housing developments will not lower our house or local housing problems. No, a lot of these units will be acquired by outsiders who have that resources. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. I do not have any other speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
Mayor, we have no raised hands.
Okay, I will close public comment and bring it back to the council if you have any other questions or follow-up. Okay, seeing none we will now
move on to the next item on our agenda which is the consent calendar and I will open up public comment. We do have a speaker slip for number 16. I can just, I can do the comments right? For all of the consent item or
should I pull it? Mayor Alarcon if there's a comment for one item you can do it at this point but if the council wants to further discuss any item on the consent calendar I would recommend pulling that item.
Okay, so for the council this item is authorize the purchase of 30 standardized trash receptacles from forms plus surfaces in an amount not to exceed $85,749.21. Is there any interest in pulling this item to having more details at this time? Yeah, we do. And I'm just curious to know if anyone wants to pull it for more information.
Mayor Alarcon you can get the public comment and then make that decision as well.
Okay great so I will open up public comment Victor Garza you are up.
2:17 – 2:2317 turns
Madam Mayor, Council, I don't have any objection to the purchase of new trash cans. But in light of the fiscal situation that we're in with a budget My thought was that here's an opportunity, well Becca you know we've been going to, we've been attending the finance committee meetings and what I've been learning is that like a lot of municipal budgets it's complex. It's got a lot of moving parts as a dynamic thing and with these staff reports you have an opportunity to educate the public assure them Educate them about where the money's coming from, how it's being spent, what the status of the revenue sources are, what program, what department is handling it. All that kind of stuff can be included in the staff report so that when we come to finance committee and ask questions, the answers are there and we don't have to dig around and try to find out certain monies are coming from.
The other thing that surprised me about this particular report, and it's not a huge amount of money but the finance director doesn't have a signature on there so I think you need to take a look at that and maybe start a different practice where you include more detailed information so that the public can be assured that we're sticking with the budget and that we're making good decisions okay thanks.
Thank you for those comments Do we have, I do not have any other speaker slips for the consent calendar. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We have no raised hands.
Okay, I will close public comment and then bring it back to the council if anyone would like to pull that item or more information. Okay seeing none I will ask for a motion from the council to approve these items.
I'm
sorry come on up Victor. Item number 20. I'll reopen public comment.
Similar comment to 16, but I also want to add that this one's a big. This was a big one 719 thousand and I'm I Was concerned that it's on the consent calendar and not an administrative item. I think Decision like this the department head or the program manager for this activity It should be present, available for council member questions. Walk them through the process, explain the history behind in this case the RFP process what was done before and what's being done now? Are there going to be any improvements or increase in level of service?
That stuff is not in the staff report and maybe Doesn't have to be but if you if it's an administrative at least you have a chance to ask that person what's going on Okay, that's all I have.
Great Thank You Okay Now there are no other comments And just double-checking Brian we don't have any other Anyone via zoom that may have raised their hand as well. That's correct
still no raised hands
We'll close public comment. I'll bring it back to the council
That being said, I think item number 20 does merit a standalone action item on that one. I had some questions on that also.
Okay great so we will pull that item and can we move it over to...
There's a section there for that?
Yep I'm looking for that section now.
Mayor it's right after public hearing. It's consideration of any items removed from consent calendar.
Thank you. So making sure there's consensus, we will move that item after item number 21. Great. So I am still looking for a motion from the council on the consent calendar items 12 through 19.
I'll move to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held July 27th, 2026 and the special meeting held July 28th, 2026. To receive and file the warrant register for the period of July 20th, 2026 through August 14th, 2006 pursuant to the Carpinteria Municipal Code Section 2.08.150F To receive and file the report on contracts executed by the city manager for the period of July 7th, 2026 through August 3rd, 2026. To receive and file the monthly City Treasurer's Report on Compliance with Statement of Safekeeping and Investment of Public Funds for June 2026.
To authorize a purchase of 30 standardized trash receptacles from Forms Plus Services in an amount not to exceed $85,749.21. To authorize a city manager to execute an agreement with the County of Santa Barbara to participate in the community hazardous waste collection program providing household hazardous waste collection services to Carpinteria residents and qualifying businesses.
To authorize a city manager to execute amendment number one to the professional services agreement with Tripepi Smith Talent Solutions for strategic planning services increasing the contract amount by $19,600 for a new total contract amount not to exceed $54,875 To authorize a city manager to execute amendment number four to the agreement with Dudek to complete the CEQA Documentation for the ring con multi-use trail project in an amount not to exceed twenty three thousand nine hundred and eighteen dollars For total amended agreement amount of two hundred fifty two thousand And thank you for reading all of that. We have a first and a second I will request a roll call vote please
2:24 – 2:372 turns
Before we move on to administrative matters, I will ask for a 10-minute break and we will be back at
810. Thank you Today is Monday August 24th, and it is 8 13 p.m And we will resume our meeting with administrative matters beginning with item 21 Which is the consideration of? Resolution number six four nine one approving appointments to the community development block grant committee
2:37 – 2:428 turns
Good evening mayor and council members I've got this item tonight and So there are currently three vacancies on the Community Development Block Grant Committee. Two are at-large members and one is an alternate at-large member. A notice of these vacancies was posted on the City website and at City Hall in accordance with the MATI Act. The city received applications from five interested applicants. All applicants have been invited to attend tonight's meeting, some are here.
Following this presentation, the mayor will open up comment for the applicants. And if they choose to speak and then the mayor will open up public comment on this item. Since the number of applicants exceeds the number of open positions each council member will rank their top three candidates using the ranking sheet provided for you at the dais With the first candidate ranked as one, second candidate ranked as two and third candidate ranked as three.
Council members rankings will be tabulated in the results shown and the council can proceed to adopt resolution number 6491 appointing the top three candidates That concludes my presentation mayor
Excellent, thank you. Any questions from council? Okay so we will begin with hearing from our candidates. Just pulling up the list. Oh I can use this. Carly Bass. Yes welcome.
Hello, good evening Mayor Alec on council members and staff. My name is Carly and I wanted to take a moment to introduce myself and share a little bit about my background. I've lived in Carpinteria for over 16 years and have worked in the nonprofit sector here in Santa Barbara County for more than 20 years. During that time I have served in a variety of roles with multiple non-profits organizations throughout our county. I also have a master's degree in organizational management for nonprofits. Currently, I work with a private family foundation here in Santa Barbara County where I oversee grant making nonprofit partnerships and community investments across a wide range of sectors.
My experience working on both the non-profit and funding sides has given me a strong understanding of the challenges organizations are facing, as well as the importance of thoughtfully and responsibly allocating limited resources to best serve our community. I am also actively involved in Carpinteria Community. I serve on the board for Canolina Elementary, as well as a board for our local AYSO program and I volunteer with multiple organizations throughout the city. These roles keep me closely connected to local families, school, youth programs and the day-to-day needs of our community.
I really want to just take a moment and say thank you for your consideration. I would be honored to bring both my professional experience and my perspective as a longtime Carpinteria residents to the CDBG committee, excuse me. And I also look forward to learning from other committee members and working together to make thoughtful decisions about how our resources can best serve the needs of our community.
Thank
you. Thank you. Jean Manicki? Welcome.
Good evening Madam Mayor, Council Members. I'm Jean Maneke and I'm assuming that each of you had the opportunity to look at my application and my resume so I'm not going to rehash all that for you. I do want to tell you that I looked at everybody's resume and I was just really kind of stunned that the quality of candidates that this drew. I think that speaks well for Carpinteria and it's exciting to think about being in that group All five of us have experience with acquiring grants and approving requests for grants.
The one quality that I bring to this table that the others don't is my legal training and my experience. Some folks will argue that lawyers just get in the way of good planning, present company excluded. I understand that and I respect the frustration that people have dealing with lawyers but you know lawyers are trained to analyze proposals in terms of effectiveness functionality and potential success we're skeptics and we can be the strongest advocates you can find I bring no preconceived notions and beliefs about any organization that might ask for funds. I have no prior history or conflicts with any organization that might come before this board.
I too want to see controlled growth in Carpinteria. I'm concerned about the number of unhoused in our community, I want the children of Carp to have incredible opportunities as they grow up here. I want their parents to have jobs allowing them to feed their families and house their families here, and I wanna find ways for the community to be a partner in making all that happen for them.
So I look forward to the opportunity to work with the council as a member of this committee and I appreciate your consideration. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have and I've still got a minute left. But I'm done.
Thank you, appreciate it.
Thank
you. Lois Mitchell?
2:42 – 2:4912 turns
Good evening. I am very impressed with people that went before me, I think as was mentioned you have some really good experience and expertise that's been offered here and I was thinking that since you have more candidates than positions that maybe some of the people that have offered their availability and services could possibly fill some other committees that you have Need to have some of the same needs. I'm not super particularly stringent about wanting to be on this committee. I just had read about it and thought, well, I have a lot of experience in this area. I've overseen thousands of grants and lots of nonprofits. I serve on the community foundation in Santa Barbara. I'm a trustee. I see that with many, many private partnerships just feel that this was a way I could give back to my beloved Carpinteria.
Um, I've lived in Santa Barbara County for close to 45 years and um, I'm happy to offer my services. So that's really all I have to say. I thought that if there was questions, I'd be happy to answer any of those. Thank you.
Rosalyn welcome.
I am not going to reintroduce myself because I think the council knows who I am. I too do not have the vast experience as some of the former candidates, what I do have experience with is dealing with people and understanding people And youth, people of all ages through many, many years of volunteering from volunteering at Klein Bottle which has to do with youth.
To working in the Santa Barbara School District at some point and volunteering services there. And of course my volunteering here in Carpinteria I wanted to be involved in a different manner, and so this was very appealing to me. Not only do I care about humanity, but I also care about where our dollars go and how our dollars are spent. And if you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
No questions? Thank you. Susan Everett? Does she happen to be on via Zoom?
No, Mayor.
OK. If we don't have any questions, I will now open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We have no raised hands.
OK, I will close public comment and it looks like now we will complete our ranking form. That's
correct.
Great. Thank you. And actually, can I ask a question, Brian? If you can just share a little bit about the committee itself and what they do and the purpose. Sure. That would be helpful with the ranking as well.
So the CDBG committee's basic duty is to review grant applications for CDBG funds and that's, CDBG stands for Community Development Block Grants. To review CDBGs funds and to make recommendations to the City Council on which applications to fund and support the community's interests and help address identified needs.
And it looks like everyone's done. Yes. OK, looks like all the scores are in. It looks like and I just want to reiterate we have two vacant positions and then another vacant position that is the alternate if we go by the scores that are tabulated. We have Carly Bass Lois Mitchell.
2:49 – 2:5620 turns
So those two would be
Roslyn
regular at large members and then the number three
would be the alternative So I will put that forward to the council. I'm happy to To get any other input from council members if they see otherwise, I just one quick
follow-up question I appreciated the suggestion too since there were so many good candidates here Can they maybe be notified of other? Currently open positions on other committees that they may be interested in because there was such a wealth of experience with this particular group
Right now the only other Council advisory group that has some openings is the integrated pest management committee so that one has three at-large public members open right now.
Okay, and then when do we next do choices for other committees so that folks can
Redirect
their applications.
The ideal time will be around November-December when we go to do the next two year cycle for all Council Advisory Group members, so that would be the prime time.
Actually I really like that idea and I'm wondering if we could, if you don't already just have a list going so that when it opens up you can shoot one large email out to past applicants?
Oh of course.
Perfect okay um just ensuring no other conversation discussion around members
Just a quick comment, I've worked with the Hutton Foundation. I've done quite a few grants with them and assisted them in consultation of recipients so appreciate the interest in actually taking this position.
So I'm happy to put the motion forward if I could have a second one. We have a first and a second, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? None? Motion passes and I'd like to just say thank you to all of our applicants for coming out this evening and really wanting to get involved with the city it's such an important piece of the work that we do so thank you all.
I'm sorry mayor I did not catch the motion maker and the seconder
Oh, I was the motion maker and Wade was the second. Thank you. Seconder. Oh, Al Clark was a seconder.
Thank you.
Okay perfect thank you we are now moving on to Consideration of any items removed from consent calendar and or other agenda items requested to be advanced. So we will be hearing item number 20, which is authorize the city manager to execute an agreement with Showscapes Inc for landscape maintenance services in an amount not to exceed $719,640. It's a big number.
Good evening Mayor, Vice Mayor and Council the item before you tonight is consideration of a new agreement with Showscapes Inc for citywide landscaping maintenance services. Just a little background Showscape has provided cities landscape maintenance services since 2021 their current agreement included initial three-year term and two optional one-year extensions, both of which the city exercised based on satisfactory performance in the City's positive working relationship with Showscapes. With those extensions now exhausted the existing agreement cannot be extended any further. Consistent with the City's procurement policy staff conducted a new competitive solicitation rather than simply continuing with the existing contractor In May, the City issued a Request for Proposals for Landscape Maintenance Services utilizing a qualifications-based selection process.
The RFP was published through BeaconBid and advertised nationwide, and the City received proposals from four firms – Showscapes, Forest, JAS Landscape, and Brightview. The proposals were evaluated based on the firm's overall qualifications and ability to perform their work, experience of their supervisory staff responsiveness and availability understanding of the city scope and operational needs and past performance on similar contracts.
Following review of the written proposals staff conducted interviews with all companies as well. Showscapes was determined to be the highest rated firm. Staff then requested fee proposals again from all The scope continues to include landscape maintenance at city facilities and properties throughout Carpinteria, including parks and open spaces, bike paths and trails, parking lots, parkways and medians, and other public rights of way. Street trees are not included in this agreement.
As part of the RFP process, staff also took the opportunity to evaluate service levels and identify potential cost savings. Consistent with the City's efforts to reduce expenditures and minimize impacts to the General Fund, the new scope reduces mowing and weeding frequencies at select locations where staff determined that a lower frequency could be accommodated without materially affecting the appearance or functionality of city properties.
These adjustments result in a reduction in the City's monthly landscape maintenance cost from $23,300 to $19,990 per month. This equates to an annual saving of $27,720 or approximately $83,000 over the initial three-year term. The proposed agreement is for an initial three-year term with a total not to exceed amount of $719,640. Funding for these services is included in the adopted fiscal year 26-27 budget and would be incorporated into future budgets subject to council appropriation. Staff is therefore recommending that the City Council authorize the city manager to execute the agreement with Showscapes Inc. for landscape maintenance services in an amount not to exceed $719,640. This concludes my report and I'm here available to answer any questions.
Thank you. Questions? Yeah actually I've got a few questions on this one
2:56 – 3:0113 turns
I know we've used this company for quite a while. They're doing an outstanding job, however, I do have some comments questions or potential alternates that we may look at in the future not immediately but in the future first off The areas that they cover they do an outstanding job with but there's still some areas that aren't being covered under the contract. I don't know if those are actually part of their purview or scope, or if they're outside as an example.
The Linden northbound roundabout that gets on the freeway there we still have weeds like five six feet tall in there and some of the areas. They are the closest ones to the freeway so I don't know if that's Caltrans responsibility or ours. The other ones have been maintained much better than they were previously. So I did want to bring that up. possible idea that I would put forward is actually on the website. Put work order areas in where they could, if residency an area that could be used, could use some of the work, that they could actually just submit a work order to have those areas taken a look at or addressed. That way it saves staff time. You don't have to do it, just come straight into a work order.
One of the other challenges I've seen is a tamal interpretive play area that was done all in native plants. Unfortunately, they take special care and we've lost about 50% of those because of poor trimming and poor taking I have poor maintenance on it, basically. They cut a few of them too tight. Some of them they actually cut at the wrong time and there's a lot of water issues that need to be repaired or replaced so again something like that we could probably just put work orders in or even do walk-throughs. I'd be happy to walk through some of the areas that are sensitive in habitat Last part of it actually is a budget item. We may want to take a look at having a neighborhood, actually volunteer sites where neighborhoods could adopt small garden portions, parkways things like that.
I know for example along Via Real Hales Lane is where I live. There's quite a few of the residents actually taking care of the green belt on the street side and they'd be more than happy to continue doing that would be my guess, but the challenge or risk is that there's no liability on that so we'd have to get some sort of city allowance or permit for that
Thank you Council Member Nemour. Through the Mayor, I took notes on all those comments just a couple things for work orders we do use GoGov so anyone could submit a work order on our the City of Carpinteria app on your mobile device or online and that is where we get a lot of information because as you know our team is just a few people out there in the field every day so we really appreciate residents letting us know when there's issues and the team responds to them really quickly
Do they have that on their electric carts, GoGov?
So the team has GoGov and the work order on their tablets. The public works team but that only goes to city staff okay and so then Ryan Airely, the Public Works Manager will dispatch staff each day based on GoGovs received other projects going on or urgent matters etc but they do have access to that throughout the day
Okay. And then the electric carts that are being used currently by, I think it's The Landscape Company? Those are stored here or do they bring them in and out?
Council Member Nomura through the Mayor, Showscapes does not store their vehicles here. They do bring them in daily. I'm not certain where they store them but i know it is not here in our yard.
Okay sounds good thank you.
And then to just address your concern about Tamal, I definitely agree and understand the concerns. I did a walkthrough myself with Showscapes just a couple months ago. It was brought to our attention that water was inadvertently Turned off. It was something that was on the state park side that we just weren't aware of and they weren't aware it affected Tamal the water has been back on We'd repaired the irrigation issues because as you mentioned there were quite a few so we're hopeful that with water Some of these natives will just come back and then once we are giving them we give them a chance to come back We're gonna walk through with show escapes again If this agreement is approved and address it, but we do want to give the natives a little bit of time with some water to come back on their own and then take another look at it to see what the issues are.
I think the Rotary Club is actually considering putting in budget for a replacement also so just to give you heads up on that. Thank you
Thank you. Regarding the bidding process, I was just curious if there were any lower bids from competent contractors?
Council Member Clark, through the Mayor, Showscapes was the lowest bid.
There's
information in there that is extremely reasonable. Mostly other companies would be quite a bit more.
3:01 – 3:1116 turns
That's really helpful. Thank you for that question, I was going to ask that too. Any other questions? Okay, no questions. I will open up public comment on this item. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We do, Mayor. Oh, we have one speaker, Andy Patrick. Andy, go ahead.
Thank you. I just had a quick question. I wonder if there was any research done on bringing Thank you for your comments. And Mayor that concludes a Zoom comment
And we'll close public comment. Actually, that's actually a really good question. Have you guys thought about that?
Yes Mayor, we have and Stefan Downs our management analyst for the Public Works Department has done initial research and analysis on this and going in-house is an option It could be a cost savings option. We do want to spend some time digging into it further. The biggest, and I don't wanna say hesitation but pause is the upfront cost to purchase all the equipment. So we would need to purchase mowers, blowers every piece of equipment that ShowScapes utilizes.
We would need to purchase up front and then maintain and replace. So that's something that we would like a little bit more time to dig into, to really analyze and find where that upfront cost will come from. Because yes, to the caller's point, that is a significant amount of money although I don't think it could support quite that many staff considering benefits and all that.
It's definitely something we are actively looking into absolutely. Thank
you. One thing you might want to take a look at is actually breaking that down into two parts. Most expensive equipment you're going to have are going to be the mowers and large equipment, things like that but many of the landscaped areas are stripped landscapes so they're smaller in scale and size with less tools than you'll need to have. Outlay for tools like that will probably one quarter to one third of what the cost would be to do park areas
Thank you member. Thank You councilmember Nomura great thank you okay I'll ask for a motion
I'll go ahead and do that one then I move to authorize the city manager to execute an agreement with showscapes Inc for landscape maintenance services in an amount not to exceed seven hundred nineteen thousand six hundred and forty dollars
second
we have a first and a second roll call vote please
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move to authorize the city manager to execute an agreement with showscapes Inc for landscape maintenance services in an amount not to exceed
Show transcript
We will now move on to other business beginning with item 22, which is the consideration of resolution number 6492 Approving the City Council policy titled naming policy
All right Apologize you guys are here with me for the next few items so I'll do my best. Before you tonight is resolution number 6492 which would adopt the city's first formal naming policy as council may recall we held a workshop on this policy on July 27th At that meeting Council provided direction regarding which city assets should be eligible for naming, the criteria that should be considered, recognition associated with significant donations and the process for reviewing and approving naming requests.
The policy before you tonight incorporates that direction. Historically, the City has considered naming and renaming requests on a case-by-case basis, albeit minimal. The purpose of this policy is to really establish a consistent and transparent process going forward Both for the public submitting requests and for staff and council in reviewing them. There are a few key components of the policy that I want to highlight. First, the policy identifies which city assets are and are not eligible for naming. Eligible assets include parks open space beaches the community pool trails the community garden recreational facilities sports fields dog parks Overlooks and plazas as well as significant components of facilities such as playgrounds, rooms, gardens, trailheads and pavilions.
I want to add a caveat here that any land in the open space that's under the conservation easement with the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County would not be eligible for naming per that agreement unless otherwise outlined in our agreements with the land trust. Consistent with council's direction at the workshop, the policy specifically excludes City Hall, the Carpinteria Community Library as a whole, public streets, public art installations and small non-structural amenities such as benches.
Interior rooms or designated features of the library still could be considered. Second, the policy establishes criteria for evaluating proposed names. These generally fall into four categories location geography and natural features significance events places and community history outstanding individuals who have made meaning and lasting contributions to Carpinteria specifically and in limited circumstances major donations An important point regarding donations is that accepting a donation does not entitle someone to naming recognition. Council retains discretion to determine whether a contribution is significant enough to warrant naming and whether naming an entire asset or perhaps a component of that asset is appropriate, so ultimately it is up to your council to make those decisions.
That also helps distinguish this policy from the city's donation policy which has been approved and the sponsorship policy that is also on tonight's agenda. Donations, sponsorships and naming are three different forms of recognition. Naming is honorary and remains solely within the direction of City Council Third, the policy establishes a formal review process. Requests would be submitted through the naming and renaming request form included with the policy. Staff would first review the application for completeness and consistency with the policy.
Where there's an existing appropriate advisory body, the request would go through that body before coming to City Council. For example, a library-related request could go through the Library Advisory Commission. An open space or trail request could go to COSMAB, the Carpinteria Open Space Management Advisory Body. For requests where there isn't an applicable advisory body, a staff committee would be formed to review the request and make a recommendation to City Council.
In all cases, City Council retains final decision-making authority. The advisory bodies and staff committee are just simply making recommendations. They're not approving the name. This policy also treats renaming differently from naming something that currently doesn't have an official name. So renaming requires a higher level of justification because an existing name may already have historical geographic or community significance. The policy establishes additional criteria for those requests and creates a preference for retaining established names unless council determines that the public benefit of changing the name outweighs retaining it.
A renaming would also require at least four affirmative votes of City Council, so supermajority. Finally, the policy makes clear that naming does not create a permanent or vested right. Council retains the authority to modify or remove a name when appropriate and naming recognition generally ends if the named asset is demolished, removed, relocated, or ceases to exist.
With that staff's recommendation tonight is that the City Council adopt resolution number 6492 approving the naming policy and I'm happy to answer any questions you may have
Questions from Council? Just one quick question. So in terms of the significant donations, are we intentionally avoiding a specific percentage or threshold for that and if so then how would council determine what rises to that level?
Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor yes exactly after giving it a lot of thought back and forth because The donations and the items may just range so widely. It was difficult to come up with a percentage or an amount because it could be, you know... A significant donation to one project is going to be vastly different to a significant donation of a much larger project. Ultimately, it would be up to your council to make that determination. There would be again the staff review of it if there was a staff committee or an advisory body review of it to provide you a recommendation in helping make that determination.
But yes, there's no set percentage or amount that would warrant that is included in the existing draft policy
Okay. No, I appreciate that and then it also sounds like there's Also the opportunity for council to choose a portion of a larger city asset And so that I can see maybe that coming into play when we try to determine the naming of In that context too.
Absolutely, Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor one example that was brought up when we were discussing and doing the workshop was you know the community pool it's a 3.3 million dollar project if someone were to make a sizable donation but you know perhaps not the entirety of the 3.30 your council could decide to you know name the lobby or a locker room after someone who made a sizeable donation great thank you
3:11 – 3:1913 turns
Quick question for this one Jeanette on the item number four criteria for removing name from a city asset on that one there I assume the first point would be a person or a naming of somebody that Potentially would have fallen from grace would be like a way to put it. I guess so Would that be included in that portion of it
councilman member no more through the mayor? Yes, that was the intention of Yes
Any other questions? Great, no questions. I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We do have one raised hand Mayor Arturo Oteo. Arturo go
ahead. Okay okay I wanted to speak actually Regarding the Benson Bioswale. I know it's coming up, so I'll go ahead and speak now that might help you with them. I just want to put it in the record. So good evening Mayor and Council. I'm Arturo Tello owner of the Palm Loft Gallery here in Carpinteria. And I'm speaking in support of renaming the farmers parcel on Bluffs 1 to the Vera Benson Bioswale. This name change makes sense for three reasons.
First, it ends the confusion. The current name comes from the farmer family who once owned the land not from farming. There's agriculture elsewhere on the bluffs but not here. Second, it tells us that this land actually does This buffer is a bioswale. It filters and cleans runoff water before it reaches the ocean or our aquifer. The name will match the purpose, and third most important, it honors Vera Benson through her work With the Carpinteria Valley Association, the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County and the Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs, Vera's contributions to this city are greater than we can fully measure.
This is a fitting recognition. The name Vera Benson Bias Oil is clear, it's accurate and it's very much deserved. I urge you to approve it And then later to invite Vera and the family to come there along with supporters and take a picture with you. Thank you for your attention.
Thank you for your comments.
And may I hear that concludes zoom comment?
Yeah, we'll close public comment and bring it back to the council for any other comments or questions in a course of motion.
I move to adopt resolution number 6492 approving the naming policy.
We have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? None. Motion passes. We will now
move on to item number 23, which is adopt resolution number 6493 naming city-owned property APN 001-180-062 the Vera Benton Bioswale
Thank you Mayor. The next item before you is a request to name the city-owned property identified as APN, Assessor Parcel Number 001-180-062 commonly referred to as the Farmer Parcel, rename it the Vera Benson Bioswale. This request originally came from the Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs and was considered by COSMAB, the Carpinteria Open Space Management Advisory Body in September of last year. Following its discussion, COSMAB voted to recommend the proposed name and forwarded that recommendation to the City Council. As discussed in the previous agenda item, staff has also evaluated this request using the framework that is now in the established naming policy that was presented to you all this evening.
To orient everyone to the property, the area outlined on the screen is the approximate 1.54 acre city-owned parcel located north of Carpinteria Avenue and east of Baylor Avenue directly across from the Carpinteria Bluffs Nature Preserve and Viola Fields. The city acquired the property in 2009 through a public acquisition effort that included funding from citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs, the city, and the Land & Water Conservation Fund.
Following the acquisition, the property was incorporated into the Carpinteria Bluffs Nature Preserve and is managed by the Parks Recreation and Community Services Department with advisory input from COSMAB. The property has commonly been called the Farmer Parcel but that is an informal reference based on the surname of the properties former owners and as Arturo mentioned it was not actually farmed.
This closer aerial gives you a better view of the property itself. There are really two parts to the proposed name and I think it's helpful to briefly explain each. First, Vera Benson. Vera is a local artist educator and conservation advocate and co-founder of both the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County and Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs. She played a significant role in protecting and preserving open space throughout the Carpinteria Valley, including the Carpinteria Bluffs. The second part is bio-soil which relates to the function of the property.
The parcel serves as a seasonal stormwater conveyance and retention area. Storm water from the Viola Fields parking lot and surrounding areas flows through the property before ultimately reaching the regional drainage system at Carpinteria Creek. Under the existing conditions, vegetation and accumulated soil slow and retain water in portions of the parcel during wet periods contributing to seasonal wetland conditions.
Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs has described the property as functioning similarly to a bio-soil because it receives slows and temporarily retains stormwater within a vegetated area. There has also been a long-term vision for potentially enhancing those stormwater and habitat functions in the future. I do want to emphasize that tonight's action is only the naming of the property, no restoration, drainage improvements or other physical improvements to the site are being proposed or authorized as part of this action.
When evaluating the naming policy council considered just moments ago, staff found the request to be generally consistent with the policy. The proposed name recognizes an individual whose contributions had significant and lasting impact on the preservation of the Carpinteria Bluffs in the surrounding open space while Bioswell portion of the name reflects the property's existing stormwater and ecological functions and the long-term vision for the site. The request was also reviewed by COSMAB, which is the appropriate advisory body for this city asset.
Ultimately however, the decision to approve, modify or deny the proposed name remains with the City Council. Staff's recommendation is that council adopt resolution number 6493 naming APN001-180-062 the Vera Benson Biosol. Thank you and I'm happy to answer any questions. Any
questions from council? Okay, no questions. I will open up public comment. Looks like we have a speaker slip. Ted Rhodes? Is this you? Okay, come on up.
3:19 – 3:3321 turns
Well, Arturo said a lot that I don't need to say and actually have said it in the quoted in the staff report and the earlier documents. But I was president of Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs when we made this quiet acquisition. Very few people know what is the farmer parcel even just as bluff nerds call it that. But then when we do mention it to people there's what? There was farming out there? No, it's a long story. So it's been a source of confusion for those of us involved COSMAB and the bluffs because it has nothing to do with farming. And I wish at the time of the acquisition that Matt Roberts was involved with, that we had just thought to rename it then but I'm grateful that the city is considering that now and I do want to also say that we do have some funding that we hope also to put into Improving this property as a bioswale due to some errors that made some mitigation that the Edison company caused some, a little bit of damage out there.
So we do plan to at some point come back probably to COSMAB and Jeanette with a plan on that regard, working with the city. But anyway, I encourage you to honor Vera who is other than Lois Seidenberg probably worked on saving the bluffs longer than any other individual here and was part of the Carpinteria Land Trust that later merged with the Santa Nez Land Trust to form the land trust for Santa Barbara County. So a lot of history there. Thank you.
Thank you, thank you for your comments. I do not have any other speaker slips. Do we have anyone via Zoom?
We have one speaker, Susan Allen. Susan, go ahead. Susan, you want to unmute yourself?
Thank you. I want to second Arturo and Ted's comments and remind the general public how much of an educator Vera was, certainly saving the environment but She brought so many people along. She encouraged, she taught, she listened and continues to I should say and this is something well deserved and I'm hoping that you all agree thank you so much.
Thank you for your comments.
Sure sure come on up. I just wanted to personally thank Jeanette for being so patient and following through on this because I know she's got a lot on her plate right now, so we really appreciate the work she's done on this. Thank
you. Do we have any other zoom comments?
Mayor that concludes zoom comment.
Okay, I will close public comment bring it back to the council for any questions and of course a motion
I'll move to adopt resolution number six four nine three as read by title only naming city-owned property identified as APN zero zero one one eight zero zero Six two the Vera Benson bioswitch against
we have a first in a second all those in favor. Aye Any opposed none? Motion passes We will now
move on to item number 24, which is consideration of resolution number 6494 approving a citywide sponsorship policy.
I apologize you moved faster than my mouse. All right the final policy I have for you this evening is the proposed citywide sponsorship policy The requested action is to adopt resolution number 6494 approving the policy. Currently, the City does not have a formal policy governing how we solicit accept administer and recognize sponsorships. The purpose of this policy is to really create that consistent framework citywide while also making sure we have appropriate safeguards in place to protect the City's interests. This also complements the donation policy City Council adopted in May, as well as the naming policy adopted again just moments ago.
Together these policies give us a much clearer framework for the different ways individuals businesses and organizations may support city programs and services So the most important distinction with this policy is really the reciprocal benefit when you're asking what is sponsorship. With a sponsorship, an individual or organization provides financial or in-kind support to a city program or event with the expectation of receiving some limited recognition in return.
A donation is different because it is a charitable contribution without the expectation of recognition or another reciprocal benefit. And naming is separate from both. Naming is an honorary designation that is considered under the city's naming policy and is not something a sponsor is contractually entitled to receive. And one important point here, is that recognition is not advertising. The city can acknowledge that a sponsor supported a program or event but that recognition does not constitute an endorsement by the city of that sponsor By the city of that sponsor, their products services or viewpoints.
So how the policy works? The policy also establishes a pretty straightforward administrative process. First a department identifies a program or an event for which it would like to seek sponsorships and develops a fundraising plan outlining the opportunity and the proposed recognition. Sponsorship is solicitation is conducted by city staff and offers are reviewed by the appropriate department director.
Approval then follows the city's existing delegated authority and procurement threshold so that's similar to the donation policy we're going to stick with our procurement thresholds for the approval levels Early approved sponsorship must have a written sponsorship agreement that clearly identifies what the sponsor is providing and what recognition the city is providing in return.
And importantly, recognition isn't provided until the agreement is executed and the financial or in-kind contribution has been received or otherwise approved by the city. Finally all sponsorship revenues and in kind contributions have to be processed and accounted for through the city's normal financial procedures. The policy gives staff flexibility to recognize sponsors, but it also puts some pretty clear guardrails around that recognition.
Recognition could include things like a sponsor's name or logo on event materials or signage, acknowledgment on the city webpage, recognition in promotional materials, onsite acknowledgement at the event, or public acknowledgement by city staff at a council meeting. But again, the intent is acknowledgement not commercial advertising. So we would not allow a product or service advertising promotional messaging or calls to action. A sponsorship cannot imply city endorsement influence city purchasing permitting or regulatory decisions create a conflict of interest or create ongoing obligations for the city beyond the sponsorship term The city also retains editorial control over how recognition appears and has the discretion to decline a sponsorship if it isn't consistent with the city's interests, policy, applicable law, strategic plan and strategic goals.
So finally, I wanna provide council with just some draft examples of what this could actually look like in practice. Attachment B of the staff report includes a draft list of potential sponsorship opportunities across several city programs. For example, sponsorships could help support an age-well community social dance or the Dia de los Abuelos event. A dive in movie at the community pool, library programs such as seasonal community reads, the sustainability events such as the Fix It Fair, or supplies and programming for a city's CERT emergency preparedness program.
I do really want to emphasize again that attachment B in the slide here is just a draft planning tool. Council's not approving these specific sponsorship opportunities or amounts tonight, this is really just intended to illustrate how the policy could be used and the opportunities and ideas of amounts that can be refined as programs and events develop. Ultimately the goal is to give staff another tool to bring outside financial and in-kind resources into city programs while making sure we are doing so consistently, transparently and with appropriate protections in place.
So staff recommends the City Council adopt resolution number 6494 approving the sponsorship policy. With that I'm happy to answer any questions you may have. Any
questions? Just two quick questions. So I really like number 11 in the policy talking about how sponsorships should not create ongoing financial, operational or staffing etc needs for the city. How do we make sure that sponsorships really supplement city programming instead of creating and obligating costs that continue past one time?
Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor, that's a great question. So the obligation is really just for whatever the agreement term would be so the program length of time or for that specific special event and these would be programs or events that city staff find align with their programs mission vision and values their strategic goals And or for example, the Fix-It Fair. We're doing the Fix-It Fair annually but one idea that the Sustainability and Environment Division had was to be able to provide some stipends to the fixers as a thank you for their time and that's currently not budgeted so this would enhance an already existing ongoing program So this would be for programs, events, things that we are either already doing that we could make better or that we want to do within our capacity with our staffing limitations and not causing overtime or undue burden onto the staff.
It would be something that is in line with what their work plan is.
Great. No I appreciate that yeah that helps to really underscore the fiscal sustainability that's built into this policy which is great And then also, since this will be a new policy, would council be receiving an annual sponsorship activity summary at the end of the fiscal year? Or is that envisioned to come back to us so that we get a sense of what all these sponsorships have been in the past year.
I've spoken with our finance director about it and since it is new we will definitely work out the details. My initial thought is that this would be really great to highlight within our period reporting in the financial slides that we present to you all quarterly within the fiscal years for whichever departments are receiving sponsorships because we would want to, it would be right for work that we would already be reporting on as part of those period reportings. It's part of our goals and then we do report to you all on like financials as part of that so I think it just makes sense if we fit in there and it could be a quarterly opportunity to highlight and see how it's going. It's perfect. Thank you very much.
I had a couple questions for you on this one also. On it, I didn't see a lot of information as far as how you're going to be qualifying the sponsorship people that are actually giving the funds. As an example if it's going to be groups, if it would include individuals, non-profits, service organizations things like that usually on these I see name specific identifying factors like that. The other question or concern I have is the screening aspect of it, if in fact yeah if it is inclusive of individuals, if we know where those funds are going to be coming from, if it's going to be a non-profit, if there's gonna be somebody with money that we may find out came from questionable resources in the future
Yes, Council Member Nomura through the Mayor. Those are great points so as it was envisioned and drafted is sponsorships could come from any of those that you mentioned individuals organizations non-profits or businesses we do have a provision about you know if they're if the entity's revenue is substantially derived from the sale of alcohol illegal drugs illegal drug paraphernalia firearm weapons I'm looking at 12 a B and C. And so it also says that we would not accept Sponsorships from entities with the intent to act on behalf of, in support of or opposition to any political candidate or ballot measure, advocate political position. Or any entities that discriminate on the grounds of race, religious creed, color etc., etc.
So there is some language in there definitely and ultimately the city would reserve the right to Respectfully decline any sponsorships, and it would be at the level depending on the policy the procurement policy It would either be department head City Manager or your council.
Yeah, so there's actually a screening process in place
Council Member Nemour through the mayor, yes there is a screening process. To your question about finding out where the funds come from specifically I would look to city manager or legal attorney.
3:33 – 3:4217 turns
Council Member Nemour through the Mayor. I don't know that we would, I mean I think we would take it at the organization or agency level of who's donating the funds and don't know we would track much beyond that however um i just wanted to say this is an uh Jeanette can correct me if i'm wrong but it's an overarching policy for sponsorship in the city but we would have a sponsorship agreement for each event that would talk about what would be given as a sponsorship related to that event And each one of those agreements can have separate, they don't have to be identical.
And so that's something that I just wanted to make clear that we're not tied to this overarching thing but will be able to even make it more specific per event.
The only reason I brought that up, once we approve this it's going to go through the process. If the process is less screening potential and just becomes kind of a stamp then I think we may have a problem with it so that's why I was a little concerned about including that in the verbiage
And sorry, Councilwoman Moore. Can you restate again what the concern, the specific part language you were concerned about? It's
easier to put the guidelines down the way we have it right now. Those all make good sense to me however if in fact there is somebody that would fall in the category of not being eligible for this one, if that person or that group would go through and not be checked, that would be my one big concern. Somebody's going to have to do a checking on those
Councilmember Nemour, I know when I used to be a development director in a past life and we didn't accept funds from you know cannabis dispensaries and things like that. And it really was based on whether they made the donation from the organization. It didn't really stop an individual who owned a cannabis dispensary from donating as an individual So really the check was based on the person that was seeking the recognition. So if it was an individual name, the screening was at that name level and then of course if it was a company or something like that or an organization then yes we would do some research into the organization or the company.
Michael, I can add in some additional thoughts. Council Member Nomura through the mayor. I think as Michael was saying we'll probably have different types of sponsorship agreements to implement this process and similar to what we do with a lot of other city agreements including our development applications right there's sort of a self-certification or yeah I'll call it a self certification process so we could include language on those sponsorship agreements where the individual would have to attest that you know, the funds that they're Planning to donate don't come from illegal Profits or you know something along those lines but I think there's only so much the city can do in terms of kind of tracing where funds go in terms of Potential sponsorships to the city so I would I would recommend some sort of self attestation or self certification
Very good. I would agree with that The main thing is I just want to make sure that you know We did our due diligence if it goes through and somehow makes it through the cracks at least we did what we could
Do we have any other questions Okay, no questions. I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom?
Mayor we have no raised hands
Okay, I'll close public comment bring it back to the council for any other questions comments
and emotion Move to adopt resolution number six four nine for approving the sponsorship policy
second
We have a first in a second all
those in favor
aye
any opposed none motion passes We will now move on to the legislative update
Thank you Mayor Alarcon, Council Members. So this evening's update includes summaries and positions on several bills including housing related bills AB 2296, AB 1751 and SB 1117 a voting rights bill SB 1164 and some updates on previously summarized bills such as SB 1013, AB 1383, SB 866 and the Proposition 36 funding request So in previous City Council meetings we summarized SB 1013, AB 1383, SB 866 and AB 2296 as well as the Proposition 36 funding request. I'm not going to cover those in any detail this evening but I do have notes on them if we want to revisit any of those. So the bills I am going to summarize tonight, there are three of them. AB 1751, SB 1117 and SB 1164. And these are ones that we have not covered in previous meetings.
So AB 1751 is authored by Quirk Silva. It's referenced or referred to as the Missing Middle Town Home Ownership Act. And it would require local governments to ministerially approve townhomes of less than three stories in multifamily zones and vacant single-family zones, regardless of compliance with state certified housing elements. So in those multifamily zones a developer for example could propose smaller projects than those planned in the housing plans meaning that cities could then be required to find additional housing sites to maintain their housing element certification and so this is kind of one You know, impacts of down zoning. League of California Cities is currently recommending opposing this bill because it takes discretion away from cities.
SB 1117 is authored by Cervantes. It refers to accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, so as currently drafted it would drastically limit the impact fees that cities could collect for accessory dwelling units larger than 750 square feet An example here is a project applicant proposed 1,000 square foot units. Cities could only charge impact fees for about 250 square feet of that unit which is a 75% reduction in impact fees that as you all know go to provide essential infrastructure and public services for new housing developments and for the city.
The League of California Cities is also recommending municipalities oppose this bill. The last bill I'm going to summarize for you all this evening is SB 1164, also authored by Cervantes. It's relating to elections so it would greatly overhaul the California Voting Rights Act or the CVRA. CVRA once again is one of the laws That was cited in a lot of the challenges to public agencies, forcing them to convert to district elections.
So this proposed bill would apply broader subject very subjective standards to virtually any Election policy or practice including district maps, polling locations and voter outreach. And by creating undefined standards for voter suppression and vote dilution it could eliminate meaningful safe harbors expand who may bring claims and where permit lawsuits without warning and expose cities to repeated challenges to district maps The California cities also recommends opposing this bill unless it's significantly amended.
3:42 – 3:5029 turns
Great, thank you. Would anyone like to move forward? Any opposition of any of those bills?
I thought AB 1751 SB 1164 and SB 1117 all looked like they would be relevant to us and would be good for us to send letters for and I know that AB 2296 we've already sent a letter for that but I appreciated seeing the update for that one too.
I agree with that.
Yep, I'm happy to support that as well
Yeah, so just to confirm one before we do make a motion. Mayor Alarcon, just a reminder to go out to public comment but if I understand Vice Mayor Solorzano's comment it is that there's a motion on the table to send letters opposing AB 1751 SB 1117 and SB 1164? Yes
Okay, I will open up public comment. I do not have any speaker slips Do we have anyone via zoom
and mayor? We have no zoom comment
I'll close public comment and bring it back to the council
for a motion So I move that Council directs City Attorney to write letters of opposition to AB 1751 SB 1164 and SB 1117
We have a first and second. All those in
favor?
Aye.
Any opposed? The motion passes. I apologize if I can just clarify Vice Mayor Solorzano, we usually work with the city clerk to draft those letters. Oh great yes. So I just want to make sure that that's incorporated as well just to keep costs down yeah great
okay we will now move on to committee reports inquiries and other matters presented by council members
Yeah, I can say that the Public Engagement Committee met on Monday August 10th and we discussed the state of the city that's going to be coming up next Monday.
Any other report
outs? Yeah, I've got two items i'd like to move or talk about. First one is community matters when I just did last week Ryan did a great job of briefing it out putting a powerpoint together for it Michael came back on his from his time a little break there to have it presented we covered Rina and also Builders Remedy how that fits in where it came from and how the city could effectively work within our confines of what we have to do.
The second item, this is a little bit different it's not off of any of the specific items you have here but I want to make a suggestion this is for staff and also for the council consider And that would be actually moving forward with including the four or five strategic priorities we have identified. That would include, for example, finances, housing, the roads and keeping carpentry at Carpinteria. So in doing that the reason I'm bringing that up is if we include this in agenda points We would be more apt to actually have coverage of those. So as an example, today's agenda we had a lot of great things going on but we didn't touch on any of these the four priorities that we've identified in the past and the reason I bring that up This would allow staff more focus time to prioritize what they're working on, rather than the day-to-day.
There's a lot of things right now that we have that are working with that may not fit within the strategic priorities we're looking at and that's why I'm suggesting if you do that it would give them More reason and better time to actually prioritize on the jobs that they're supposed to be working with as opposed to those that may not have quite the priority of some of the other points we're working with right now.
So again, I'm bringing that up as a suggestion. I don't expect us to take any action on it. It's just a suggestion.
I'm not sure I quite understood the suggestion. Is it for something that the council can do or
staff? This would be staff related to help out them, they're extremely limited on time right now especially given the financial constraints we have and the amount of work that we have them doing so that's why I pointed that
out.
We're putting a lot of time on
Is that clear to staff in terms of the request that's being asked or do you need more clarity?
No, I'm just making a suggestion.
I do actually have a recommendation just based off of an earlier item today that came up on an annual basis. I believe this happens in December the council approves the calendar of all of our meetings so It would be great if we could consider amending the existing policy to include avoiding scheduling meetings on either religious holidays that involve significant work restrictions moving forward.
I'm not sure exactly when that timing takes place but if the rest of the council is on board it would be nice to just have something on the calendar moving forward so
I'd be curious to know, do other cities have that in place? Yeah. Because it seems like I can understand that and I would wonder what the threshold for holidays would be because there are a lot of religious holidays that could impact it so that might be my only concern would be maybe seeing examples of what those calendars might look like in other cities and then just making sure to figure out where that threshold is.
If I can jump in, Vice Mayor Solorzano through the mayor. Great suggestion great question as well there's no kind of overriding direction that you know I can look out there and say yes all cities do this some cities do recommend okay I'll take a step back it's You know, all cities or at least the majority of cities do recognize both state and federal holidays. And they're not going to be...and that's state law, right? So you can't plan public meetings on those dates. That said, there are a lot of lesser holidays that aren't mandated to or restricted from holding public meetings and I think Vice Mayor Solorzano as you were saying it is hard to figure out where to draw the line there.
Some cities we looked at it particularly in response to as we were planning for this upcoming Planning Commission and there were some cities that did have a policy in place to avoid. certain Jewish holidays and other holidays, I would have to assume that it was because there were larger populations of those individuals practicing that religion in those cities that led them to make that decision, that policy decision to restrict public meetings on those particular dates. But across the board all cities don't follow any sort Um, set these holidays. We don't have public meetings in these holidays. We will still schedule public meetings so I think it would be very much a case-by-case basis here but it's definitely something that we can look into.
Well, I would love to if staff could look into it if there's consensus.
I have a little bit of information in the past when we've had these meetings especially on special call meetings like the one we're having at the Planning Commission previously used always try and hold it the same scheduled time what we do is we modify the agenda to where the agendas would be heavier on other items prior to and afterwards, by leaving that one void specific just for that one specific topic.
That way we didn't have to schedule in second and third times. It helps staff also because then they're not obligated to put in a special time for that. So something to think about whenever possible. We just shifted around to where it would fit
So maybe that's part of the policy is that if something lands on those states, we can shift some things around. I don't know. I just think it would be really great to do some work on this as we set the calendar for 2027 moving forward.
3:51 – 3:533 turns
Mayor, I think when we come together, I'm just trying to confirm because I think we actually may have more time and it could be something that could be discussed as part of the next strategic planning session only because I think in December we meet and we finalize a calendar for like holidays and things like that for staff. But I don't think it confines us to a larger policy on whether to hold meetings on certain religious holidays. I think that's a larger discussion that could occur at a separate time, and maybe a strategic planning session would work. We could certainly...
We could look into information and see if we could find about various religious practices in the community. And I know that I've been in a previous city where it was a different religion, and there was a large number of community members that practiced that. And there was some...I don't know that there was a policy but there was definitely some effort to avoid scheduling things on those dates I'd like to say that we tried to do that here as well. Yeah, but happy to continue that conversation Not sure that it needs to happen in December, but may perhaps in like January or February's if that would be okay
Yeah, I mean I'm fine with that is there consensus with council members? Yes Okay, great. Thank you. Okay, so moving on Attendance of council members for future meetings. Yes. Yes, and And we will not be adjourning, we will be adjourning into closed session. So it is 929?
Great thanks Mayor Olicon I'll just announce this into closed session again so we'll be meeting for a continuation of one of our agendas closed session items anticipated litigation or sorry conference with legal counsel for anticipated litigation for one case thank you