BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 16, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:1228 turns

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:55

Good evening everyone and welcome to our Goleta City Council meeting of June 16th, 2026. If we could have the... We have a special presentation. We're going to have the Los Ninos de la Flores girls come and help me with the Pledge of Allegiance if they could come up? Are they here? Yes there they are!

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:29

Okay, if you'll all rise and join us in the pledge of allegiance. Ready? Begin. Thank you. Thank you so much for helping us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:07

Okay,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:20

if we could have roll call.

Roll call — called by City Clerk
Show transcript
Yes thank you Madam Mayor. Council Member Raiz-Martin? Here. Councilmember Kerrioco? Here. Councilmember Kasdan is absent. Mayor Pro Tempore-Smith? Here. And Mayor Parodi? I'm here

we can have our translators please come up and introduce yourself

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:45

Buenas tardes, nada más un aviso que se está proporcionando interpretación simultánea entre el inglés y el español para esta junta. Si quisieran participar en esta reunión o escuchar todo lo que se va a presentar en español tenemos algunos auriculares disponibles para que lo puedan hacer. Pueden alzar la mano, dejarnos saber, estaremos en el cuarto de junto para el resto de la reunión. So this is just an announcement to let you know that we have simultaneous interpretation available for today's meeting between Spanish and English. If you'd like to follow along with everything that's being shared tonight in Spanish, if you'd like to participate in Spanish, we have some listening devices available for you to do so. You can raise your hand. Just let us know.

We'll be in the room next door for the duration of the meeting. Thank you. Gracias.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role5:27

Thank you. Okay. Mr. Rosen, do we have anything to report from closed session?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:36

Thank you, Mayor. For this evening's closed session right into the agenda at 5 p.m., there is no reportable action.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role5:41

Okay. At this time we'll have public forum. Anybody that wishes to speak to anything that's not on our agenda this evening?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:51

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. I have no speaker slips for those of you on the Zoom webinar who wish to speak to a non-agenda item please use raised hand icon and I will call on you. I'm seeing none mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role6:05

Then we will move on to City Manager's report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:09

Thank you Madam Mayor, that went quick.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role6:11

And amendments and adjustments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:15

Yes, we do have an amendment tonight that we're recommending. So staff is recommending that item A8 on your consent calendar this is a an item recommending a three-year contract for street sweeping services in the city. We're recommending that that be pulled off the agenda for tonight and we will return to Council at another council meeting.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role6:37

And there needs to be a motion on that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:41

Mayor, I do not believe there needs to be a motion

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:44

the City Council could approve the rest of the

consent calendar and remove item C I'm sorry A8 from consideration.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role6:51

Okay thank you. Do you have anything to report? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:54

do yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:54

I just want to report on our Meet Me in Old Town events that are coming up starting tomorrow but first before I do that a reminder that the team we're hosting Team Austria is playing tonight so wish them good luck They're up in Santa Clara at Levi Stadium playing Jordan at 9 o'clock tonight. That is their first game in the World Cup, but we have two Meet Me In Old Town events coming up back-to-back a week apart and that starts tomorrow June 17th. We'd like to remind everyone Meet Me In Old Town returns tomorrow night and also the following Wednesday June 24th The City in partnership with Santa Barbara South Coast Chamber of Commerce, we've planned two free evenings celebrating community local businesses and the unique spirit of Old Town Goleta.

Come to the intersection of Pine Avenue and Hollister this is next to Community West Bank. The events from 5 to 8 that's both tomorrow and a week from tomorrow on the 24th and it's kind of a block party style event The year's event features expanded space, additional activities, live entertainment, food, family-friendly experiences and a world soccer watch parties in the Cox Watch Party Lounge. So wondering what that is exactly?

Sounds good. Attendees can expect live music, interactive games, activities, local food offerings, community vendors, seating areas, opportunity to explore Old Town businesses and promotions. Families can also enjoy kid-friendly experiences including games, art stations, mobile library and the first 50 children to arrive each evening will receive a complimentary Kona ice.

So June 17th tomorrow 5 to 8. The music is Out of the Blue and then June 24 another party same location.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed8:57

You can also watch the new take a look at the new mural that's right there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed9:01

Yes, so if anyone hasn't noticed it across the street maybe up a half a block or so or right across the street. Yeah very cool mural on the wall that was painted using a grant part of the old the grant series that the council gave to the Old Town businesses last year.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role9:18

Great thank you so much. Council Member Reyes-Martin?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed9:23

Thank you just on that note I wanted to thank The large city staff that put together the watch party last Friday for the USA team's first match at the community center. I can't thank you all enough, the whole team I know that was there Marcos, Shannon, Blake, the entire Goleta Community Center staff it was so amazing. I saw well over 200 people, so many kids I had so many parents tell me thank you, thank you City of Goleta for offering a really warm family-friendly opportunity for young kids to get to experience watching the World Cup. All the kids in their jerseys. Thank you to Pepe's for the delicious food.

It was truly a wonderful community event. So thank you to everyone who was part of putting that on.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role10:19

Council Member Carriaco?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed10:20

And I want to apologize that I had to miss it, but I had a very good reason. My wife's daughter Sydney was graduating from the University of Denver with her Masters in Social Work and so I was out-of-state. So I was very sorry to miss that but I also really wanted to extend appreciation to staff for putting that together and all the community members that came out and attended as well. And then last couple things I'll say is, I'm looking forward to the two Meet Me in Old Town events. Getting to see Columbia and then Mexico play back-to-back weeks. That's going to be really cool. And then lastly, I just want to compliment our Mayor Pro Tem on her outfit choice tonight. Go Austria!

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role11:01

There you go! It was a fun watch party. We had a great time so I'm glad... Sorry you missed it but you were a little busy yeah You needed to be there. Okay, all right so now we're moving on to consent calendar.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role11:19

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. That's going to be item A1 approval of the City Council meeting minutes of June 2nd 2026. Item A2 ratification of mayoral appointments to the Design Review Board and Public Art Review Board. Item A3 acceptance of the April 2026 investment transaction report. Item a4 resolution hold a public hearing for street lighting benefit assessment for fiscal year 2026-27. Item 5 CPI adjustment of the fiscal year 2026 27 Glieda Library special tax rate Item A-6, Finance Department Professional Services Agreement and Amendments with H. G. O'Cohen & Cohn. Hidden later, Dale Amundson Associates and Rogers Anderson's Malady Scott LLP. Item A-7, Annual Review and Adoption of the City's Investment Policy Item A9, award of general services agreement for traffic striping and pavement marking services to WGJ Enterprises, DBA PCI Inc.

Item A10, public works professional and general services amendments with DKS Associates Inc., Disability Access Consultants LLC, El Encanto Pool Services Inc., and County Sanitation Company Inc. Item a 11 amendment number one professional services agreement with Good Samaritan shelter hedges house of hope for interim housing beds and item a 12 award of fiscal year 2026 27 Galeta City grants an approval of amendment number two to the MDG associates LLC professional services agreement

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role12:41

Council wish to pull any item

0:12 – 0:1918 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed12:46

I'm 812 just for a brief comment,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role12:48

okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed12:51

Thank you. This is the item on the city grants and while I don't have questions, I just want to extend my appreciation to the staff team for shepherding this huge process along. It's quite a process to get to what appears as just a consent item tonight, but it's multiple committees that review all of the city grant applications. I'm so glad that this is an ongoing commitment of this council to help support our local nonprofits in various areas from nutrition to children and youth, so many great organizations doing important work in the community. So just wanting to share my appreciation.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role13:38

Thank you. Okay, I'm looking for a motion but remember that A8 was pulled. I got it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed13:44

I'll move consent items A1 through 7 and 9 through 12.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed13:49

Council Member Kariakou, I believe we still need public comment on the consent

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role13:53

agenda. I'm sorry. I just so excited to see the dancers. I always do this every year don't I? Okay if we have any public comment

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role14:02

please. Yes thank you Madam Mayor. I have no speaker slips for those of you in the Zoom webinar please use your raised hand icon and I will call on you. I do have Gareth Kelly. You have three minutes to speak, please unmute yourself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed14:18

Hello City Council. Firstly sincere apologies I can't be with you tonight. I am coming to you from a hotel in Salt Lake City where i'm actually shooting a film. I did also get to go to the watch party last night and it was fantastic so thank you all for that And I did send in written comments, but I just wanted to make the effort to come and express my deepest gratitude to the grant committee for awarding our festival an award this year. We're really looking forward to Wild & Free Film Festival's second year in Gleda and our first as a non-profit. We're really thrilled about This event and you know, as I have told many of you. You know, this is a long-term commitment for us and we hope to really grow this event into something that the city can be proud of and it grows and grows and grows year on year and we've got some exciting things already coming so just to express my gratitude again to City Council and the grant committee and yeah thank you again for your support and really hope to see you all in the fall and look forward to everything thanks again.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:27

Thank you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role15:29

And I have no further speakers.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:31

Okay, now we can make a motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed15:33

Now I'll move items A1 through 7 and A9 through 12.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role15:39

I'll second. Okay roll call vote please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move items A1 through 7 and A9 through 12. I'll second. Okay roll call · 1 under review
Show transcript
Council members please lock in your votes. Council Member Reyes-Martin? Aye. Council Member Curiaco? Aye. Council Member Kasdan is absent. Mayor Pro Tempore-Smith? Yes. And Mayor Pierotti? Aye
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:55

Okay the ayes have it Okay, moving on to our first presentation of the evening.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role16:02

Yes thank you Madam Mayor that will be item B1 a proclamation of the City Council of the city of Goleta California recognizing the month of July 2026 as Parks and Recreation Month in the city of Goleta.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role16:13

And Mayor Pro Tem Smith will be presenting

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role16:32

Okay. All right, it is my pleasure to share this proclamation this evening. This is a proclamation of the City Council of the city of Goleta recognizing July 2026 as Parks and Recreation Month. Whereas the City of Goleta recognizes the month of July as Parks and Recreation Month, an initiative of the National Recreation and Park Association, and embraces the 2026 theme, The Power of Connectivity Play Community Nature and Belonging.

And whereas the power of connectivity reflects the essential role that parks and recreation plays in bringing people together across generations, cultures, backgrounds, strengthening civic engagement and fostering meaningful relationships throughout the Goleta community. Whereas the power of play enhances physical health, mental well-being and lifelong learning by providing inclusive programs safe spaces and recreational opportunities for youth adults and seniors alike.

And whereas the power of community is demonstrated through the city parks facilities events and volunteer programs that create shared experiences Build neighborhood pride and promote collaboration among residents, local organizations and businesses. And whereas the power of nature enriches the quality of life. In Galeta by preserving open spaces, protecting local habitats and offering access to natural areas that inspire stewardship environmental awareness and appreciation for the outdoors.

And whereas the power of belonging ensures that parks and recreation services are inclusive and welcoming to all providing equitable access and opportunities that allow every resident to feel valued connected and supported within our public spaces And whereas the City of Goleta Parks and Recreation Division works year-round to enhance the health, happiness and resilience of our community through innovative programs well maintained parks and partnerships that reflect the diverse needs of Goleta's residents.

And whereas the U.S. House of Representatives has designated July as Parks and Recreation Month, and the City of Goleta recognizes the benefits derived from parks and recreation resources. So therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Goleta does hereby recognize July 2026 as Parks and Recreation Month in the city of Goleta. Approved this 16th day of June and signed by Mayor Paula Perotti. Congratulations!

0:19 – 0:297 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed19:50

This way, one two three.

PresenterJustin WilkinsParks and Recreation Division and our community thank you for this proclamationProposedself-stated20:10

Good evening mayor and members of the council. Oh sorry I'll let you grab your seats first sorry My name is Justin Wilkins, I'm the Parks and Recreation Manager for the City of Goleta. On behalf of the Parks and Recreation Division and our community thank you for this proclamation recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month. Each year Parks and Recreation Month is an opportunity to celebrate the spaces programs and experiences that brings our community together and remind us that parks and recreation are truly where community happens This year's 2026 National Parks and Recreation Month theme, The Power of, highlights the power of parks and recreation to strengthen communities support health and well-being and create places where everyone can connect and belong.

Our team is especially excited for this year's celebration as we continue building momentum across our park system. We recently celebrated the opening of our new splash pad at Johnny D Wallace Neighborhood Park creating another place for families to gather and play We're also continuing our partnership with library services in the park, expanding opportunities for learning recreation and community connection.

The City of Goleta's parks open spaces and programs provide residents opportunities to enjoy the outdoors stay active and experience natural beauty that makes our community unique Over the next week, we'll release our 2026 Activity Guide featuring free and low-cost activities for residents of all ages. We encourage everyone to get outside, try something new and enjoy everything that Goleta has to offer. We thank you again to the Council for your continued support of Parks & Recreation and for recognizing July as Parks & Recreation Month.

To learn more about the City of Goleta's parks, open spaces and recreational opportunities we encourage you to visit our website at www.cityofgoleta.gov or org. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role21:56

Thank you very much. Do you have any public speakers?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role22:04

Yes thank you Madam Mayor I have no speaker slips for those of you on the zoom webinar who speak to this item please use your raised hand icon and i will call on you And I'm seeing none.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role22:15

Okay, thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role22:17

And that takes us to item B2, a proclamation of the City Council of the city of Goleta, California declaring June 18th, 2026 as Fiesta Ranchera Day in the city of Goleta.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role22:27

Thank you and I'd like to ask Colin Hayward, El Presidente 2026 Old Fiesta Days and Denise Stanford and anybody else from the Goleta Valley Historical Society would like to come up same time? And then after, then we'll have the spirit and junior spirit. I'll go over to you. I'm reading them. Okay, a proclamation of the City Council of the city of Goleta California declaring June 18th 2026 as Fiesta Ranchera Day in the city of Goleta.

Whereas Goleta and Santa Barbara communities will celebrate the 103rd annual Old Spanish Days Fiestas celebration from August 5th to August 9, 2026. And whereas the Goleta community welcomes Fiesta Ranchera and celebrates the 18 years of tradition and collaboration between Old Spanish Days and the Goleta Valley Historical Society And whereas, Fiesta Ranchera Day brings people together and celebrates in shared history and culture of Rancho La Patera.

And whereas, Rancho La Patera was the site of Goleta's first fiesta event, Fiesta at Stow House August 3rd 1968. Old Spanish days dedicated to honoring and preserving the rich areas, rich history spirit culture heritage and traditions. And whereas Goleta Valley Historical Society stewards of Rancho La Patera preserve, interpret and foster research of the history of Goleta Valley and the Stowe family. Sharing this treasured landmark from the golden era of California ranching and providing a unique and historic gathering place for the community. And whereas the city of Goleta will again play host to an official Old Spanish Day Fiesta event to be held June 18th That's Thursday, this coming Thursday at Rancho La Patera and Stow House which will feature performances by the Spirit of Fiesta and the Junior Spirit and local entertainers.

Now therefore it be resolved that the City Council of the city of Goleta does hereby proclaim June 18 June 26, 2026 as Fiesta Ranchera Day in the City of Goleta approved this 16th day of June 2026 and signed by myself Paula Perotti. Spirit and Junior Spirit, please come up. I have certificates of recognition and then we're gonna, oh thank you. And then we'll have you say a few words, take pictures, have you say a few words, and performance which is favorite.

I mean you guys are special too but. All right come on up. So, Junior Spirit. Certificate of Recognition. The certificate of the City Council of the city of Goleta California presents this certificate of recognition acknowledging Penny Hernandez. Oh wait I'm doing the spirit first yeah are you? Wait wait let me did i get that no your your penny right okay I've got it right I'm sorry Acknowledging Penny Hernandez, 2026 Junior Spirit of Fiesta. Penny Hernandez is 10 years old and has been dancing since she was three.

She has a true passion for flamingo along with hip hop, jazz and jazz. She plays volleyball and has proudly placed in her school spelling bee three years in a row reaching the county level this year. Penny attends Our Lady of Mount Carmel. Where her faith in God continues to guide her. She loves spending time with her friends and family, walking her dogs and enjoying the outdoors on her family's ranch.

One day she hopes to become a dance instructor and inspire young kids to build confidence and express themselves. So the City Council of the city of Goleta proudly honors 2026 junior spirit of Fiesta, Penny Hernandez signed by myself Paula Perotti Mayor. Okay, we have one more. The City Council of the city of Goleta California presents this certificate of recognition acknowledging Jenna Ramirez 2026 Spirit of Fiesta. Congratulations.

Jenna Ramirez is a 19-year old student currently attending Santa Barbara City College where she is pursuing a degree in radiology She began dancing at the age of two and discovered her passion for flamingo at eight years old. Her dedication to this form has taken her to Spain, where she had the opportunity to train with elite dancers while deepening both her cultural appreciation and technical skills.

Throughout this journey, she has learned the importance of hard work, resilience. Never give up on your goals. She hopes to inspire others by expressing emotion, strength and confidence on stage. She wants young dancers to see that it's okay to be bold and embrace their individuality and pursue their passion with courage and determination. So the City Council of the city of Goleta proudly honors 2026 Spirit of Fiesta Jenna Ramirez, signed by myself Paula Perotti.

So we're going to get a picture with everybody so let's just come on over here and we'll all come back out

0:30 – 0:3620 turns

CommentAndrew ChafosProposedself-stated30:10

Everybody nice and tight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed30:13

There you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:13

go,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role30:13

all right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:17

Yeah, there you go.

PresenterColin Hayward Presidentboard and everybody involved with Old Spanish Days thank you so much for this prProposedself-stated30:17

Tighten

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role30:18

it up, tighten it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:18

up, tighten it

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role30:21

up. Column move in a little bit, there we go. All right, yeah, go ahead. Okay, here we go, ready? Big smiles, one, two, three. All right, can we have... All right, here we go. Three, two, one. Perfect.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed31:36

Thank you Mayor and City Council, we really appreciate today every year that you get to help us celebrate the traditions that we have fostered over the last 18 years. I want to say that I'm appreciative of your support of Goleta Valley Historical Society and the traditions that we continue to bring and foster and enjoy in the community of Goleta. Thank you so much, we appreciate this honor very much.

PresenterColin Hayward Presidentboard and everybody involved with Old Spanish Days thank you so much for this prProposedself-stated32:11

Good evening Mayor, good evening City Council. I'm Colin Hayward President of Old Spanish Days 2026 on behalf of the board and everybody involved with Old Spanish Days thank you so much for this proclamation being partnerships with the It's been a long term endeavor for us. We appreciate it and enjoy it. It brings together food, drinks and dance and just community so we really appreciate the proclamation and recognition that you do every year for this event and this year's theme is Fiesta Forever. Hopefully this is what exactly will happen with Fiesta Ranchera. Viva la fiesta.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role33:00

Thank you.

PresenterColin Hayward Presidentboard and everybody involved with Old Spanish Days thank you so much for this prProposedself-stated33:03

We now are presenting to you our 2026 official Fiesta poster. This was designed and painted by Pedro de la Cruz, a Santa Barbara local artist. And we have it.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role33:21

Let's go ahead.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role33:23

You might want to turn it around so then everybody could see it maybe? Yeah. Thank you. Okay, do we have some girls that want to dance this evening?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:13

Here, everything in this world is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed34:44

paid for. And leaving without paying you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:51

for sure

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed34:53

won't make you die. Everything you did for me, I want to give you as a faithful witness. And then you will know what

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed35:17

I will do. How I would like to return, my love. How would I like to return I know what you think, with all the resentment that I feel. But since it's not like this, by the hand of your daughter, I swear to you that one day, more than me, more than me, you will suffer. For everything you did for me, I was blind to reach your path. And then you will know...

0:36 – 0:4312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:39

The City Council meeting is being held in the city center.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role37:19

Kenny Hernandez, Junior Spirit. Thank you. Jenna Ramirez? Spirit?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed37:47

At the fine bathroom in the store, at the fine bathroom in the store, a girl fell. A girl fell there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed38:24

Hi.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed38:46

I went to the bathroom in the store A stain fell, a stain fell there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed39:05

For

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed39:06

my precious mother For my precious mother Why did she lose her voice? Why did she lose her voice? Yo me subí a un pino verde Ay, por ver si lo divisaban Por ver si lo divisaban Y subiste el pulmón Del coche que yo llevaba Del coche que yo llevava In the streets of Los Muros In the streets of Los Muros

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role41:07

Oh, President Carriaco, did you have something you'd like to say?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed41:57

Well first of all just another round of applause for the two dancers. Our spirit and our junior spirit. And I just I really want to thank both Old Spanish Days and the Goleta Valley Historical Society for continuing to put this event on so many years later I think it's always important to recognize the people that kind of help kick things off. And so a few people, I really want to make sure get mentioned. Daisha Harwood had a lot to do with making this event a success. Rhonda Henderson, Robin Cederlof, Roger Ann Debbie Aceves. Thank you to everyone that had a role in getting this wonderful tradition started and thank you especially now to those of you who are keeping the tradition alive.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:42

Thank you. Do we have any speakers?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role42:46

Thank you, Madam Mayor. I have no speaker slips for this item. For those of you on the Zoom webinar please use the raised hand icon and I will call on you. And I'm seeing none.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:55

Okay thank you so much. It's gonna be hard to follow that.

0:43 – 0:547 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role43:17

That'll take us to item C1, adoption of the City of Galeta operating budget and capital improvement program budget for fiscal year 2026-27 mid cycle and five year capital improvement program. Approving updates to the personnel rules, approving certain benefits inside letter agreements with SEIU local 620. Thank you

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:36

thank you thank you Okay, so this is a public hearing and so we will open the public hearing which I'll do right now. And staff will make their presentation and we'll have questions from council and the public and any staff responses. And then more council questions if needed. And then I'll close the public testimony portion of the hearing. Council will go into deliberation, close the public hearing And City Clerk to read the, oh you're gonna be reading the recommendation this time? It's a lot

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role44:22

right. Yes I will read it. Okay

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role44:25

and then a motion and roll call vote thank you.

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated44:36

All right, well good evening Mayor, Council Members and community members. I am Luke Rios, City of Goleta's Finance Director pleased to present the final recommended fiscal year 2026-27 mid cycle operating and capital improvement program budgets for the five year capital improvement program and also a set of related personnel updates for your consideration and adoption tonight.

So we are joined here by some of our department heads, staff. Should there be any further questions or details that is needed on any of the items that are being presented tonight? Let's see here. So to keep us organized, this presentation is going to be told in five parts here. Part one is a brief recap of our budget process and the May 19th budget workshop. Part two will cover the personnel requests including follow-up items City Council asked for at the workshop. And then part three here is the final recommended budget But importantly, the base budget that's in this presentation and also in the packet does not include the personnel requests. So you can see the budget on its own footing. Now part four covers other related personnel updates and there will be a slide just kind of highlighting the resolutions that are associated with those items.

And then part five is going to cut as a short preview of future items that are for later discussion, for which is no action is requested tonight on that. So let's begin with part one, which is going to be on the workshop recap. So this on the screen here is a high-level summary of the budget development timeline plus what the four May 19th feedback items that were primarily discussed at the time. So just for some context on what tonight is and what's not, so the city budgets on two year cycle last June on June 17 2025 the City Council adopted the two-year budget plan for fiscal year 2526 and 2627 Which align with the two year strategic plan that was adopted back on May 6, 2025 and also with each department's work program.

Since then, the mid-cycle process began on February 3rd, 2025 when staff brought you the preliminary five year forecast and budget priority setting workshop. That's where we laid out the approach kind of that right size true up to the original adopted plan. And then council also gave some direction on setting priorities for the new year at their workshop specifically including with the two new facilities that came online, the Goleta train station that will be opening soon in the late summer and then the splash pad that was recently opened And then also supporting the continued deferral of the $250,000 general fund contribution to the housing and lieu fund. I wanted to mention that forecast at the time also the preliminary forecast did flag a potential long-term challenge in fiscal year 2029 but since with the revised updates is currently no longer projected.

And then from February 17th through May 5th, we had our annual work program workshops which gave an update on department's priorities and city council feedback. And then on May 19th staff brought back the preliminary mid cycle budget to you which reflected updated numbers again updated revenues mainly from fully recognizing our transaction use tax property tax updated transient occupancy tax and then also our investment income.

And then so tonight, again is mainly going to be focused on just kind of responding to the feedback that we received on May 19th. And so we did put this on here as some of the four key items. So again with personnel requests council asked for written business case freeze position full vacancy and recruitment picture and what the budget looks like shown both with and without the requests. So we've provided all three and so we'll cover those in a few slides it's also more detailed than the staff report With economic outlook and revenue risk, council asked us to continue to monitor the transient occupancy tax leading indicators and also to identify any cost reductions if conditions do deteriorate. With reserves in deferred maintenance, council supported the facility reserve policy framework just with that baseline $1 million baseline and then asked that facility maintenance also be considered as part of a holistic deferred maintenance strategy along with pavement.

And then on pavement and capital improvement program, council requested more detail on the pavement funding gap value engineering in the unfunded portion of the CIP. That item would be part of that whole long-term part five that we had just talked about. Let's see here so what we're gonna take this in order now starting now with personnel requests in part two which actually I'm going to turn it over to our city manager Robert Nisbet who's gonna kick it off discussing these requests.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:29

Thank you Mr. Rio. Yes, Madam Mayor members of Council I just wanted to underscore a little bit more what Luke just said about the direction we received the direction is summarized on page three of the staff report And he just went through each of the bullet points, and we wanted to make sure we captured the direction from the workshop so we could be responsive to the Council as you consider the budget tonight. But certainly a lot of the conversation was about the personnel requests.

So you can see the bullet point there, and as Mr. Rio said, the request from Council was for staff to bring back a business case for each of the positions in each of the job classes Also to bring back a current vacancy list of vacancies so that council could consider any new positions in the context of current vacancies that we have. And then finally it was also asked to make sure that the numbers are very clear on both the general fund and other funds if positions are paid for out of other funds, and kind of in the context of our reserves and the bottom line for recommending a balanced budget for this year. So that's all contained In the staff report, the vacancy table is Table 3. It's on page 9 and we listed it's a snapshot of every vacancy as it exists right now and I would say we took the direction as a soft hold not a hard hold but a soft hold because we did make the comments that recruitments are in various stages of the process and so one recruitment might be going to interviews the day after the council met.

So we allowed that process to continue, but generally if a position had not been advertised yet or an offer had it was at those two crucial steps had not been nothing had been done or we were about to make an offer we did hold those. We figured we could wait for four weeks and so those were held. So those are all listed. We're happy to take questions when the council gets to questions and deliberation and how that fits into your overall thought. And even though it doesn't need to be a part of the motion, wherever the council lands at the end we also want to make clear that the direction is to unhold recruitments at that point if that is the direction of council once you get past the budget.

On the requests, there were two new positions and four reclasses. The focus last time was on the two new positions and two of the reclasses so I just wanted to emphasize that. The other two are in the library. They were mentioned briefly, but so much of the focus was not on them that I could certainly see how they got lost in the shuffle. And wait, the Council might be saying are those new? They were shown there. The amount is very small. It is shown. I'm looking at it for both positions 2,900 for the year. But I just wanted to emphasize we're talking about two positions and four reclasses And there's a summary of the business case for each. The two new positions, a housing analyst in the planning department and also an inspector in the public works department to work primarily on the paving projects Our two department heads are not here tonight.

Mr. Imhoff is actually up in the Bay Area and he will be attending the Austria-Jordan game, but Ms. Wells, Ann Wells I see her in the back from Advanced Planning is here. She can certainly take any questions on Advanced Planning's work plan and how there is a relationship between all the work plans in the planning department and how this position will In housing, but help balance the workload in all of the divisions.

And then Ms. Bowman is also on vacation and so Autumn Glazer is here to take any questions about the paving program and how the inspector position as we introduced it last time cost neutral she can certainly take questions and add a little more color to how that would work in practice should the council go with that position And then Ms. Plummer is here on the reclass for the emergency manager position, the two library positions and then the other reclass was in the housing division as well, reclassing it from a senior analyst to a housing manager. So I just wanted to give that context that we got that direction and we wanted to be responsive to what we heard and were ready to take any questions when we circle back to the personnel requests but with that Mr.

Rio has more to his report There's more than just the personnel request, so I'll turn it back to him.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:25

Thank you.

0:54 – 1:122 turns

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated54:29

Thank you, Mr. Nisbet. So continuing on, this is a high-level summary table of the personnel requests just outlining the budgetary impacts. What we've done is we've consolidated both the new position requests along with the reclasses So again, I won't repeat those positions. They were just discussed here but overall what we're seeing total cost of the general fund while it may be about $326,000 but really it's being offset with recommending reducing these interim positions that have not been filled for over a year and also adjusting the contracted services for pavement so really the total net fiscal impact to the general fund is approximately $138,000 and then with special revenue funds with the county per capita. Those are just really minor there at 2,900 so when you factor all that in you know you're looking total all funds about 141,000.

So the next slide just kind of really highlights uh kind of the same information but just really summarizes the department justifications um that's further detailed in the staff report. Uh so these are again organized in a way by each department here and again I won't go into the specifics here but If Council does have any questions about more information about each of these requests, you know please feel free to let us know and we can provide you that.

So citywide authorized positions so this is just a snapshot of going back a few years and also what our current position count full-time equivalent looks like And really also what it does factor in there is the very last column, what our total position count would look like if those personnel requests were approved. So that would so if those personnel requests were approved that would move our total FTE count from 123.625 to about 125.625.

Just for context, our headcount has essentially been flat the last two years after growing in the prior period so this is really a targeted to position adjustment and not necessarily a broad expansion. And then as just mentioned a few minutes ago Council also asked for the vacancy recruitment picture so these requests can be seen against the positions that we are currently Holding vacant here and that's in these next two slides. So in this slide it's, this is only showing the full-time equivalents as of June 9th, 2026.

The way this is organized, it's by fund and so you can see the positions that are primarily supported by the general fund that are listed there about 509,100. That's the fully annualized cost of those positions. So I should just quick recap on that. So the way the city budgets we do Budget fully annualized cost in our budget for each position. We don't phase them in that is a practice we used to do a long time ago, but we found there was just too much risk with that So moving down this list, you'll see that there's solid waste. There's two positions there and you can see that amount about 356,700 and then again total vacancies with built-in library about 110,000 so to total together there's about 7.5 FTEs total all funds it's almost close to a million at 975,800 and just want to reiterate these annual costs also includes benefits too so it's fully loaded Then the next slide here is the same picture, but really just for our hourly part-time interns.

So the general fund shows about seven positions at about 110,800 and then the library fund shows about three of them at 60,600 for a total of about 10 vacancies in this category. And so again these are interns department aids and even some of them are maintenance assistant support Did wanna note here that we did include this footnote here. You'll notice that for City Council, while we have it authorized there is actually no budget that's programmed for those positions since they're funded out of each council members conferences meetings and travel allotment.

So should council ever request one we would work that internal budget adjustment entry to fund the intern position. So that completes the personnel picture that council had asked for. So now let me show you what the budget looks like with these requests when they're included. So this is a view with and without the personnel requests, we did include what the budget did look like from the preliminary mid cycle workshop on May 19th 2000, that we had a few weeks ago so you can kind of see the changes over time here.

One thing I did want to point out, you'll notice the net operating revenue shifted from 673-169 from the workshop to what's being recommended without personnel request. The 592-269 that largely has to deal with the benefits adjustments and recommendations and true ups that is included in the final budget numbers. And so that's where that small discrepancy lies down there.

Again, the very last column that is if we were to include the personnel request and this is purely on the general fund it would increase the ongoing expenditures about $138,280. It still does leave a positive ongoing net operating revenue of about $453,000. It does stay structurally balanced. So again, without that request, that margin is about $592,000. Anyhow we look at it these requests are affordable with our ongoing revenue streams.

Okay. So given that, here's staff's recommendation on the personnel. So we do recommend approval of these two positions and the four reclassifications as permanent full year appointments. Within the staff report there was kind of these other considerations that were looked at as alternatives but we did find just based on You know, just based on how to hire and also attract that it would be staff's recommendation to ultimately do it as a full year appointments. So again this slide just highlights the you know what staff is recommending so that you got your six personnel changes two FTE increases net general fund impact 138,000 again the ongoing revenues over expenditures It's about you know what those requests included stays about four hundred fifty three thousand dollars Okay, let's see here so then we actually gonna be That concludes part two so we're actually going to go into part three now This is the final recommend budget itself Now as a reminder that these numbers and these figures do not include any of those personnel request numbers.

I So what's shown here is just kind of going over high-level updates to the numbers from the May 19th budget workshop, so factoring the benefit enhancements. And so it was mentioned about long term disability and then there'll be attached resolutions related to this but this is the staff recommending you know the maximum monthly benefit increase From 6,000 to 9,000 for all eligible employees.

That's about approximately 7,000 per year short term disability that's the employer paid benefit recommended for unrepresented management executive employees out 66.67 of salary. Two thousand five hundred weekly maximum through a city's pulled program approximately 18,000 per year. That's recommended just for recruitment and remaining competitive hiring and then health allowances. So that's just given the you know the ongoing increase with health allowances Staff has factored in the budget and recommending to increase those allowances starting July 1st, 2026 specifically for the family tier. And then the plus one in family tiers in January 1st ,2027 that's estimated approximately 55,900 per year. So with those benefits included it's about an $80,900 per year in ongoing costs which is factored in already into the final recommended budget Okay, moving on here is a very high-level snapshot.

It's an All Funds and General Fund Summary. So when looking at the top line here, general fund, you can see what the total revenues look like when you compare it to our original adopted budget that was made last June for this same fiscal year. So you'll see that general fund revenues are projected to increase about 4.8%. That's about 2.5 million again That increase was primarily led by our transaction and use tax, Measure B, along with a little bit of TOT and also our investment income. Special revenue funds you'll see it dipping down about $3.7 million, about a decrease of 15.6%.

You know, these are kind of a little bit more unique because special revenue funds do include grants that are one-time in nature. And then a lot of times there are true ups or just adjustments that are made and special revenue funds I'm going to say a bulk of these do represent development impact fees and also other grants but we actually have a slide on categories of what makes up that number. And then going back down to all city funds expenditures you can see they're the original adopted budget 53 point 2 million, the revised at 61.6 million about a change of 8.4 or 15.7% increase and again just want to reiterate in that number includes lots of you know about one-time expenditures in there and so it's not necessarily it can appear to look like a deficit but it's not the one time expenditures are supported by one time funds and fund balance that we have set aside And then the same story with special revenue funds.

You can see we do have adjustments here on the expenditure side, and again this can be due to just the timing of grant revenues being received or expenditures or timing of CIP projects, and so a lot of times these get pushed out or deferred out. Okay, so now let me break down the general fund revenues here by source. So again this chart here just does a comparison again where we were at originally What we're recommending, let's see here. And it compares what our final recommended mid-cycle adjustment is.

You can see that it's again 2.5 million. Again the largest driver is transaction use tax. We did have a small negative adjustment and that was with our canvas business tax. That is kind of consistent across what's going on in other communities with that. But overall 2.5 million, transient occupancy tax still remains our largest revenue generator about 26% and now followed by our transaction use tax measure be around 24%.

Here's the same revenue picture for all funds. So this is now categorizing it, what we've done is we grouped the special revenue funds into these fund category types so starting you have already talked about the general fund and then we got the special revenue fund so I should reiterate So normally we would technically call all these categories special revenue funds, but to pull out certain major fee categories we pulled them out. So what's representing in special revenue funds right now I believe it's mostly some of the transportation sales tax revenues like Measure A gas tax SB1 And then we got development impact fees. And so you can see that original budget revenue estimate was 8.9 million, it's been revised down to 4.5. Again these numbers will continue to change actually we'll have a slide on that just because we're in the process of updating our DIF funds grants.

You can see there there's no change on that special assessments that includes our solid waste fees or not solid waste it includes our street lighting and library. So small adjustment on that, just a true up there. And then RDA and other, I believe that is specifically to the successor agency to the redevelopment agency funds there. Let's see now moving onto general fund expenditures so kind of that same snapshot told in the same way comparing the original numbers from last June to our final recommended budget and again these do not include those personnel requests. This shows general fund expenditures by department so again general fund only Let's see, really what the story here is it's about a 15.7% increase and really what's driving that number is the CIP 5.8 million where we had $0 program from the general fund again that is one-time funds have been set aside.

A majority of that is going to the San Jose Creek Fist Passage project and also 100,000 related to the Lake Los Canaros footbridge And so let's see here. Okay, yeah I'm gonna go ahead and

move on to the next slide which kind of gives a more truer picture for each department with all funds. So this includes what the department looks like on you know budgetary basis when all funds are considered some of the ones that you know that's you know what I want to highlight here is you'll see that the library you know significantly shifts on their total sources of funds or expenditures primarily because they're supported by special revenue fund so this takes an account General fund and all the special funds that are supported That supports them same with like with public works since For their department. They they do have a large amount of special revenue funds that support their departments primarily related to transportation revenues But overall you can see the picture here about, you know We were originally about eighty point nine million mid cycle recommended budget totaling seventy six point six million Okay, then that leads me to summarizing a few program highlights within these totals.

So just kind of want to remind City Council and the public that this mid-cycle update does preserve all the program funding levels that were adopted in the original two year budget with minor adjustments. There are more details in the staff report but some of them just to call out here with pavement maintenance off funds we continue to give about 6.25 million With the street maintenance program, about $8.95 million across all funding sources.

Police services is funded at $13.2 million. We have homeless support around $1.02 million which includes $475,000 to partner agencies. Parks and open space. We've got about 3.97 million in funding there, economic development 432,000, the city grant program 250,000 support to other agencies 486,000. So the new ones that were factored in here, Goleta train station, that's a brand new one, 426,00 has been programmed there.

Okay, now let me go to the next slide which is going to show where our general fund looks like over the next five years. This has been slightly updated since our last update but I did want to say that you know our general fund based on current assumptions you know we're structurally balanced in all five years net operating revenue averages $385,000 across the five years Again, largely status quo service levels. We're not assuming any new FTEs in the future years doesn't factor in restoring deferred maintenance or programs And again, it's such a tight margin there. I wanna say, I think I have it in the staff report but when you factor in the personnel requests, it'll leave our average about 241,000 so we would still be projected to be structurally balanced.

It would just be kind of a tight margin if we factored in those but additionally, in the future years, if you wanted to increase service level somewhere else, we would have to consider probably looking at either new revenue sources or trade-offs This is a snapshot based on current projections and assumptions. This chart here just summarizes that, in the yellow there represents our contingency reserves.

And then in the blue is our other reserves and one-time fund balance. So we continue to meet 33% of our operating expenditures. So that's a policy target that City Council had set. It's expected to be fully funded across the next five years. Again, that contingency reserve is there for safety and stability, immediate funding it serves as a liquidity need If there's any tax delays or any economic downturns, or even delays on grant reimbursements.

Part of the policy does allow some flexibility should there be a need for capital, one-time capital, or some revenue enhancing type of economic development project. In the policy it does allow up to one third to be borrowed but we do have to come up with the repayment plan. Okay, let's see here. Oh and I did want to you know this number the estimated actuals and this will continue to get refined as we're closing out this fiscal year end and go through our audit because we'll know our final revenue amounts here i'm going to say in August and then also with our expenditures and then what And we will go through our carryover process and then also so then we can truly determine what those amounts be. But I want to say, you know, I'm pretty confident that these numbers will hold steady if not slightly adjusted but we'll be reporting back to City Council on that.

I want to say we'll have better numbers in September and then also first quarter in December where we'll have, I want to say are audited numbers Okay, so now that

1:12 – 1:1914 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:12:50

and if I could just jump in Madam Mayor members of council we were requested also if you go back to that slide for just a second. We were all it also request this is looking ahead and our projections for our reserve We were also asked to do a look back at the reserve, say for the past five years and how that is tracked. And so I think, I don't know if Mr. Rio has it queued up now but when we get into questions and deliberation, we did prepare a slide so we can do a five-year look back which I think is pretty illuminating as well. So that's ready to go when we get there.

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:13:26

Yeah actually since we're on this topic, I can turn to that slide real quick here. Okay. Yeah, so we've prepared this is focusing on the contingency reserve and a look back of the last five years here going back to fiscal year 2021 you'll see this in the labels here act for ACFR that's the annual comprehensive financial report so that means it's an audited number but we've continued to meet the policy target of that amount, and you can see it growing year over year. And that's primarily just due to our ongoing expenditures just increasing over time and we've been successful enough to continue to fund those amounts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:14:33

While we're on this, I can ask you a quick question about this. So when you say that we're meeting the policy target in these years What was the target and then this is what it actually was?

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:14:45

Yeah, great questions yeah Yeah, no, I thought about how to show this because The way we do the way the city our city calculates are our contingency reserve is actually based on The budget amounts and we make a finding of what is considered ongoing expenditures. during the fiscal year, some other adjustments. So it's just really based on the initial budget amount. I would say this is we meet that policy target at 33% at the time of adopting the original budget.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:15:29

I see so another way of putting it as there's always enough in the reserve to meet that 33%. And anything over that just is part of the general fund?

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:15:40

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:15:41

Thank you.

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:15:41

Yeah, I would say too that we like let's just say if we use some of this contingency reserve you would probably say we would probably come to council and say like I'll use the mid cycle. We should be at 17 million but we're gonna be wrecked you know we're gonna get 15 million and then we're going to recommend a funding plan to replenish.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:16:01

I'll follow up on that just really quickly. So if we were in a situation where we had to use some of that reserve, there's an emergency of some sort, we have a policy where it has to be replaced within a certain amount of time? Do you know what that policy is? I can't remember.

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:16:19

Yeah, Mayor, good question. Yes, it's five years.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:16:23

Five years to pay it back. Okay, thank you. Council Member Carioca.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:16:27

Thank you Madam Mayor. I just want to thank the finance staff for putting together this slide so quickly. This is something that I had asked for, and I think this really illustrates two things. One is that we have an incredibly careful and cautious reserve policy. You look at other jurisdictions and it's not uncommon for 25% or sometimes even less, and being a smaller city, being a newer city You know, didn't get to have decades and decades of things like redevelopment agencies to give us an opportunity to build that infrastructure and to build that history of saving and putting money away for a rainy day. It really is incumbent upon us to have a strong reserve. And so I think this just really illustrates a level of fiscal discipline because going from, you know, to basically, Almost double our reserves over this period of time.

I think we could have adjusted that policy at any time, we could have provided Opportunities to go down to 25% under certain scenarios. But when we had COVID hit, when we had other emergencies hit, we froze positions. We made hard choices and so what we're being rewarded with today is a very healthy reserve. And I think this slide does a really good job of illustrating both the amount of money that we have set aside for rainy day.

But also just kind of provides, I think for the public more confidence. that we're not just looking for opportunities to spend any chance we get. Because if we wanted to be more aggressive, we would certainly be within our rights and there's certainly an argument to be made for that. So I'm really happy to see this. Do you have...I don't expect you to have this available but do you have the ability to put into perspective what that 17 million would mean in terms of if we suddenly just had zero money coming How many net days of operating would that represent? Would that get us through three months, two months. What would that mean where the rubber meets the road so to

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:18:50

speak? Great question. If our spend down was exactly equal it would be about four months. Another way to look at it too though is, you know, it can extend to five. You know just really depends but yeah if you equalize all of your expenditures would be about four months. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:19:09

thank you I guess the last thing I'll say is I'm really appreciating also hearing that just since we had our workshop you've been able to to look at our fiscal picture and you do not at this point see a You know, a delta between our revenue and expense where the expense exceeds our projected revenue in 2029. So I'm really glad to hear that that has worked out as we've gotten more data on how things are performing and that we're doing better on plan. Thank you.

1:19 – 1:273 turns

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated1:19:53

Let's see. All right, we're gonna go back to... I think we're starting at the Capital Improvement Program here. So over the next few slides here there's gonna be this disclaimer. We did update the Capital Improvement Program but it's gonna be further refined and discussed at a future council meeting on July 21st but we do have appropriations that are being recommended as part of this so Again, CIP project budgets will continue to be further refined. We have a five-year capital improvement program that's been attached. There's a five year CIP project list which contains our active priority projects along with a long term CIP project list and then our five year CIP budget.

Did you know really want to emphasize two of those big six priority projects? They are fully funded Okay, so summary of the new CIP budget appropriation. So this is looking at specifically for fiscal year 26-27 what we're asking council to legally appropriate. So again with the general fund the one time 5.8 million and then with special revenue funds it's 2.3 million they're totaling about 8 million for all funds This next slide is a snapshot of the five-year CIP priority projects by department.

It does talk about the funded and estimated unfunded amounts, we do show the number of priority projects And then again, the total project costs. So again this number will continue to be further refined but it's pretty much very close there but based on the current estimates and assumptions we're looking about an estimated unfunded amount over the next five years about 75.6 million.

Again we'll continue to have these updated Okay, that leads me one of the main requirement items is the GAN appropriations limit. There is a separate section in the staff report that talks about this and then also resolution state law requires us to calculate and adopt this A limit every year by resolution, it really just sets the ceiling of the amount of tax proceeds that a city can spend. The limit is adjusted annually by two factors applied together. It's either with the change of population and the greater of the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local non-residential assessed valuation from new construction.

For this year's factors, the city chose the percent change in assessed valuation and new non-residential construction of about 8.16%. And then the percent change... I think we went too fast there. A percent change in the countywide population of about, I believe it was about negative 0.14, is that correct? So anyways those factors do get added together when you apply them, the GAN limit of 91.2.

It calculates to a gain limit of 91.2 million, so really what that means is that and then we have to look at what revenues of the city is subject to that limit it's been determined about 50.2 million which means we're currently 41 million dollars under the limit. So that means we have substantial headroom and there's no rebate or tax cut concern So that completes part three.

Part four, we're gonna move on to the other related personnel updates. We've summarized these personnel updates in three resolutions that's attached to the packet. So resolution one, that includes our authorized positions, salary schedule, cleanup items to the personnel rules which is further detailed in the staff report, adding the short-term disability Let's see, four unrepresented management and executive employees along with a asking council to renew the hiring incentive policy for that flexibility.

Should those positions become vacant resolution 2 contains seiu local 620 side letter agreements related to the tiered health allowance and increases along with the long-term disability And then resolution 3 Contains information about a new temporary overhire policy Which allows the authorization to the city manager or designee to temporarily double fill? position for succession planning training or knowledge transfer there is Some parameters in there that does require a written declaration of finding from the finance director. It doesn't need that, there's actual savings to support that cost so it's designed to be net neutral, cost neutral at all times and so that's recommended there in resolution three.

Okay so that's part four. Now we're going into part five here this is just a brief look ahead uh so these items are gonna be coming back to council you know in the next fiscal year there's no action requested tonight but just wanted to reflect the feedback that was given on May 19th um so it's a little bit more detailed in the staff report but Looking ahead, summer and fall of 2026 we'll have our CIP update following the adoption of the DiffNexus study plus status of major capital grants including the grant related to the San Jose Creek multipurpose path.

Winter and spring of 2026-27 deferred maintenance facilities fundings policy so what we're going to return back with the former adoption of that policy you know which included the one million dollar baseline reserve also looking at shared responsibility options on some of the facilities that are shared with our non-profit partners and also with including the capital campaigns. And then spring 2027, that's the pavement value engineering and long-term funding so we'll get an updated pavement condition index along with funding level scenarios presented with the annual pavement update And then economic monitoring is just, again we heard Council's feedback just analyzing looking at those TOT trends, travel market revenue per available room, REVPAR data reported.

We'll incorporate those in the quarterly financial reviews as well and also just being active on looking at our tiered cost reduction measures making sure they're maintained for early response if conditions deteriorate so that's just readily available for us and we can always bring back to council and discuss that at quarterly financial reviews Okay, so that brings us to the formal recommendations. But I guess before we get here, we'd like to see if Council has any

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:26:17

questions. Thank you Mr. Rio. Questions from Council? Council Member Reyes-Martin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:26:29

Thank you. I have a question about the public works inspector position since you're here. I wondered and will this position help with things like quality control of the projects out there? Or can it also help with kind of coordination in advance? And the reason I ask that is, you know, I think specifically with some examples since I've been on council of some pavement projects where we've had to kinda go back with the contractor afterwards to like fix some striping or things like that. Is that an example of something that an inspector would help kinda catch before that happens?

1:27 – 1:327 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:27:15

Yes, the goal is by having an in-house and someone who's consistently on these projects that they do catch more. It is certainly possible that things still may slip through so I don't anticipate them all to be and the nature of our projects is that we can go back with those punch lists and the contractor does have, is required to repair them or fix them. Great thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:27:47

Just one. Is another potential benefit of this essentially changing from external accountability to having internal accountability in terms of making sure that pavement's done right the first time?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:28:01

Councilmember Kiriakou. I think that there is truth in that for sure, having internal staff and the pride in their work and they're consistently working for Goleta versus all over sometimes Southern California. And so knowing our standards other areas, knowing our hotspots, I think that you do get a better work product when having the internal inspector And I'll even add a little bit more. This inspector could also work on CAP projects, they can do encroachment permit inspections where right now we have a current inspector but when he's on vacation we do hire out another contractor that comes in so I think there is a lot of areas for consistency related to our standards and then also having these in-house allows us actually update our standards and be more consistent so that, for example, if development builds out our infrastructure it's being built not only is there a standard that we want but is actually being built to those standards.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:29:12

Thank you Ms. Clifton. A couple more questions I have a couple of questions about the reclasses who would be the best person to address those two? We can decide once you ask the question okay Well, the first one I want to ask about is reclassing an analyst to a manager in the housing division. And I just want to confirm like what's the problem we're trying to solve there? Is it that we have a position that is going to be kind of capped out stepped out and it's an opportunity give more responsibility and provide, you know, like a path or is it part of is it really more about we wanted to add another position in housing? And so in order to do that, we want to have one of them be a manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:29:56

Thank you for that question. I think it's both, so certainly it starts with the workload and so the two are tied together. So the new position we can talk about if there's questions about it and about the business case for that position and the workload in that division but then that also relates to the current position that's there and the point you just made which is now would be a two-person division And the new position would report to the current position and so there is that extra responsibility. So, that I agree with. I would also say though that what we're seeing in terms of the workload is not only an expansion of the workload and the need for two people, but a higher level of the type of work that is required.

So it's both. It's the management of a position, but it's also the level of work that's being required of the single position that's there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:30:57

now. Okay so basically we have someone kind of doing work out-of-class almost? Well, I didn't say that. But it kind of felt like you were saying it without saying it. Okay. I'll leave that alone. And then for the HR manager, it's an HR manager slash DEI officer and we're reclassifying it to just an HR manager. Can you give me a short version? What's the problem we're trying to solve there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:31:25

So I think the position you're referring to is the HR analyst. Yes, oh yeah. One of them is, yeah no it's same class, same everything we're trying to move towards less specific titles in the event that we want to move things around so one example is sometimes you'll have 300 classifications and you really only need 200 so it's not good to create a new one for every time we need it. The other part of it is in the HR we do have a lot It's going to be HR analysts and there is no impact to the general fund. That work will still continue to be done, but from a recruiting standpoint going into the future we do want to make sure that our classifications and titles are more broad to cover more topics.

1:32 – 1:3914 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:24

Okay, so we're not losing functionality in a position and we're not losing potential capacity if the position becomes vacant and we need to fill it. The reason why I'm asking and the reason why I'm being very specific is I was one of the people that actually objected to this position being created the way it was back a number of years ago I had really pushed that we would have a specific DEI off. Someone internal that could do the job and was interested, and they would get some training. We'd send them to some conferences, get them some training. And then we've had a hard time at times keeping that position filled with that skill set. So I just want to make sure that we're not going to make things harder for us to do this type of work through this decision.

So as long as I have some assurance of that, I'm fine with the reclassification.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:33:14

Yeah and that's why we went through the process of evaluating what had been done in the past and what we want to see going forward. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:33:20

thank you for that. And then perhaps for Mr. Rio, this pertains to the item about Looking after our employees in terms of the healthcare cost and making them more whole when it comes to healthcare costs. the latest either cost increase projection or quote that we're getting for what health care costs are expected to go up for in the next fiscal year. Are we looking at a 10% increase in healthcare costs?

15? Whoever should take it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:34:00

So when we factored all this in, this is as of June 9th when the PACA went out, we had taken a five-year running average based on what we had talked to our risk management folks and projections through through our agents, and that number came to I think it was 13%. So that's the number that we used to kind of model. And then Luke can share or I can share that the initial projections for next year are much lower. It's around just under 6%.

But that hasn't been adopted yet, so that's the task.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:34:33

The only reason why I ask is because I work in HR and one of the things we're really seeing is it's getting harder and harder to just look back five years or even three years and accurately project because the nature of healthcare particularly preventative care certain health care remedies for things like diabetes and others. The risk pool, the nature of it is changing.

The cost of the medications, the popularity of certain medications is really changing. And you don't want to put people into a position of having to deny them certain choices. So are we this is I think kind of a softball question but are we working with Cal Cities And CalPERS on making sure that we're evaluating the choices and the options that we're making available in a way most consistently with where the trends are going.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:35:33

That's correct. Okay, I mean the other part and just expand a little bit is we have to remain competitive in terms of what we offer for our employees. It's good recruitment good retention, but we also have to be fiscally balanced obviously on the council depends on that and that's why those graphs look As good as they do. But I think the other part of it comes to, you know, part of it is there's a lot of talk about whether certain medications are going to be limited at the state level.

We haven't had those conversations here. We haven't had to but it's absolutely top of mind when we make these recommendations. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:36:10

right that's all for me thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:36:13

Mayor Tim Smith?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:14

Yes, my questions actually related to the CIP. I understand we're going to take another look at this in a future meeting but I did notice in the staff report, I just wanted to confirm with staff, my understanding is as currently recommended that the Jenna Drive crosswalk beacon and fire station 10 were proposed to move to the long-term list and that was based on kind of where current funding is, is that correct? Councilmember Smith

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:36:50

yes. That's that was our proposal yeah

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:52

okay And then I guess we can deliver on this further. But my recommendation would be at least to move those to the active list for now, and I know we'll have further discussion in the future meeting and then also in the next two year cycle. And I think to keep it active, at least until the new MOU on Fire Station 10 in particular until the new MOU is in place. That's my only question. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:37:21

Councilman Reyes-Martin?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:37:22

Thank you. One more question that's maybe just for clarification on any of these roles that are new positions, I noted in the staff report and in the presentation that the comment was that the new staff are to sustain the existing workload not to like add things and I asked for clarification on that because You know, we went through the work plans for each of the departments and at that point we didn't consider new staff. So I just want to clarify or confirm that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:38:01

Thank you for that question Councilmember Reyes-Martin. Yeah, that I believe is true for both clearly on the inspector position and the case that's been made for that being cost neutral and an exchange of an in-house cost that were paying consultants for That's the case. Our paving program is, hopefully will be expanding as we go and we'll have that conversation later but it's consistently the need is there right now. And then I would make the same argument and relative to how I answered Council Member Kariakos on the housing.

There's just such a focus on housing in terms of the need and the requirements That is not anticipating any changes in the future. That is work that's happening now and the need for two positions, I would say it's primarily in the tenant protection ordinance and the amount of work that we're finding that comes out of that. It's in our affordable housing program and the amount of work that goes into that And then the other issue that might be the biggest actually is part of the rebalancing and that's partly why Ms. Wells is here, but there is a ton of work in implementing the housing element and so I think we're proposing some of that work goes to the Housing Division but it's going to be shared. It's a team approach in planning and long-range planning is still going to be involved but I think the Council has probably seen That's not new work.

The second the ink was dry on getting the housing element approved, Ann's division had to go into overdrive implementing all the programs and so that's what's here right in front of us now.

1:39 – 1:4710 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:39:49

Thank you for answering that question, because I was curious about that as well. I have a quick question on Public Works. That particular position, the inspector position, I know in the past it's been really difficult to find engineers in public works department. So I'm just curious, is that going to be a problem? Are we looking? Do we have somebody in mind?

What are we doing with that one? Mayor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:40:27

Parodi, we were able to actually promote internally our current inspector after our previous inspector who I believe was here more than 19 years. So it's not a position that actually opens up very often at least for here at Goleta and I wouldn't say I would say it's probably a little bit easier to find inspectors And it's something also we train in-house. So if they have enough minimum quals, we can also train them.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:40:58

Okay. Thank you. And I have a question about our sheriff contract. We don't have to worry about it this coming year but it's going to... We need a new contract 2027? Is that when we start looking at it and do we have any idea looking into the future what that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:41:18

might be? Yeah so that is a Yes, we do have a renewal for the sheriff contract. We will start in earnest later this year to start discussions but all I can say is that we have a stipulation in the contract where it talks about a baseline increase plus if there's any changes in the DSA, the Deputy Sheriff's Association, increases. As of now we have constantly been probing with the sheriff's offices, is there any movement? Do you expect anything and so far mums the word I don't know if that's going to be a 0% DSA 1%, 2% don't know but we have caveat of the staff report with using what we did use we used a amount that I think it's five point Is it 78 or 2828 percentage so that's factored in the modeling, but it would just be a wild guess at this point to add more than that.

And so what we have done is keep checking in. And once we have more additional information, we'll come back to council. But that term also has two one-year extension agreements so we could still keep the same contract and then extend it by a year or I'm sorry, one two-year extension. So there's no risk in terms of falling out of an agreement. It's just about what it costs and what the council wants to make sure is funded.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:58

I had another question on. I stopped listening about 11 a.m.. This morning, so I don't know if they actually took the vote but all the information we had gotten in the last several weeks was that there was going

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:43:18

to be a roughly a 4% decrease in the per capita, bringing the per capita amount to an even $9. So that's been factored and that's what we've been using because that's what it's been related to us. Normally what happens with the county is we do a one-year agreement, and oddly enough it usually comes to us like six months after it was supposed to start. But you know, we were aware of it, we understand what's expected but unfortunately it has been one of those areas that has been targeted for cuts.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:44:01

Okay thank you for that. And then I just have a quick comment. I know comments are usually at the end but I just wanted make it clear to staff that I hope there was no misunderstanding. I think I supported your request, Council Member Cariocco, to look at vacancies and but my intention was more for informational and I hope it didn't cause any concern that we might not fill those positions. That certainly wasn't my intention so I just wanted to let them know. Council Member Cariocco?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:44:35

Thank you, Madam Mayor. Some of the cities that we traditionally partner with when we're negotiating sheriff's contract renewals are at different stages of exploration with the City of Woonpok for a different type of contractual arrangement. And I just wanted to ask staff if we have any kind of preliminary concerns, questions Anything that council needs to be thinking about or reflecting on in terms of how those potential decisions could impact our ability to negotiate our next contract.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:45:35

Yeah, thank you for that question Councilmember Cariocco and members of council yeah it is interesting to see that the City of Solvang primarily but also Buellton some degree as well are starting to have those conversations, and I have been in conversations with the city managers from both those cities. I think we're certainly taking a wait-and-see approach.

There's a lot to such a transition, and they have some work to do to evaluate it and have those conversations. So we're going to take a wait-and-see approach, I think from our point of view on how it affects Any interaction we have to start conversations to renew the contract, we have. I think it puts us in maybe a little bit better position as we go and have those conversations with the Sheriff. It's certainly, I think sending a message to them. Solvang was clear about that some of the quotes I read in the newspaper about the cost for them and the feeling that they're not getting the value for the amount they pay. And so I think what comes out of that will be really interesting, and information that will certainly potentially could come up if we're negotiating future extensions with the Sheriff as well.

So watch and see. The four city managers, we've agreed to start having regularly monthly meetings So we're going to start that next month and meet monthly to share notes and talk among ourselves about what's going on in Solvang and Bealton, and how that affects all four of us going forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:47:15

Thank you.

1:47 – 1:544 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:47:18

Seeing any more questions before we open it up to the public? Do we have public speakers?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:47:23

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. I do have eight speaker slips four of those slips are donating time to one speaker so that's at the discretion of the mayor be 12 total minutes is that acceptable for Mrs. B okay? So we do have a total speaker slips for those of you on the zoom webinar please use raised hand icon and i will call on you our first speaker will be mrs b and this will be the speaker having three other people donating three minutes to her

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:47:56

Thank you. Good evening, dear Honorable Mayor Pro Tem Smith and the esteemed council thank you very much for respecting my ADA Reasonable accommodation due to my disabilities. I Mrs B on behalf of the Santa Barbara Tenants Union Galita chapter is petitioning the mayor and the City Council To fund and hire an additional full-time housing coordinator to better manage rent stabilization tenant rights and development demands.

Actionable details in context, the core proposal creating a dedicated housing staff role to focus on planning, development, rent stabilization and the alignment of city and county ordinances to strengthen tenant protections which to include all unincorporated renters. The fiscal context, this request is being made during the fiscal 2026-27 mid cycle budget adoption which allows the City of Goleta to adjust its two year financial blueprint.

The underlining issue, a comment states that Goleta currently relies on a single staff member to handle all housing related issues which the SBTU argues is insufficient for community needs. Budget and program highlights, affordable housing all funds $279k on page 16 This is incredibly low for a city dealing with a major regional housing crisis, which underscores my point that housing is currently underfunded and understaffed because this $279K relies on all funds, which includes outside grants. The city should aggressively seek additional state federal housing administrative grants to help double the space line program budget thereby absorbing the cost for the permanent requested housing coordinator pending items personnel change two new positions one net neutral on page 28 this is addressed in my recommendations recommendation I argue that housing is more urgent than whatever the city is considering.

Option one, reallocating one of the pending items. We note that on page 28 of the proposed mid-cycle budget two new positions are currently designated as pending items rather than leaving these funds unallocated or assigning them to less critical needs we strongly urge the City Council to formally and permanently allocate the funding of at least one of these pending slots, to establish a full-time Housing Staff Coordinator role.

Securing a dedicated staffer now prevents costly reactive emergency housing interventions later. Funding this role immediately via these unallocated slots and sustaining it long-term through a combination of developer fees and housing grants will ensure we can fully protect and strengthen tenant rights throughout our city. Option two, utilizing community development block grants CDBG. Cities often fund housing rolls through federal grant pass-throughs rather than the local general fund.

I suggest a hybrid funding model to make it more palatable To ensure long-term structural permanency for this position, we recommend the City leverage a combination of the pending General Fund staff allocations noted on page 28 alongside unallocated CDBG funds or affordable housing reserves. Tying this role to dedicated housing revenue streams guarantees its permanency without placing an undue long-term burden entirely on the city's discretionary general fund. And my last option, and my favorite, cost offset via development impact fees, DIF Goleta frequently updates its developer fees to offset city workloads caused by new buildings.

I argue that developers should fund the housing coordinator staff position because a primary responsibility of this new housing coordinator will be overseeing housing planning, development and building ordinance alignment. The ongoing cost of this permanent position should be systematically offset by DIF generated by local projects. Using dependent budget slots on page 28 as an initial launch pad allows the city to establish the role immediately, while a fee recovery model will sustain it permanently. And I've seen these developer fees build beautiful housing developments in New York And more importantly, give money to the Tenants Association so that they can gain knowledge regarding housing and tenant rights.

And I want to say to Councilmember Kariakou, I appreciate your thoughtful comments because that's what I was thinking about in terms of what has been discussed tonight. And as always, I thank you for your time and your leadership in allowing me to share my thoughts.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:28

Thank you.

1:54 – 1:595 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:54:37

I was worried I'd have to go after you Mrs. B. Good evening Madam Mayor, Council members of the public staff. I'm here today to respectfully ask that you consider investing in the staffing we need to address the incredible challenges we face together when it comes to housing affordability While I no longer live in Goleta, my work at CAUSE and personal sense of identity spans the region here in 805.

But I'm here also because I'm just a huge fan of the city of Goleta. You all have led the region in addressing some of the most serious issues faced by tenants like myself, tenants unlike myself. And while we've got a long way to go with the incredible challenges before us, I admire and respect the housing production. Just sheer numbers, the insistence on affordability, the protections for tenants, and you've really modeled it when it comes to protecting tenants and working people.

As co-founder of the All Volunteer Santa Barbara Tenants Union, which works primarily in South County and which I'm really excited has more recently in earnest launched a Goleta chapter. We regularly see tenants each week who are sharing their stories about having to pack in tighter, commute farther, work longer and make really difficult decisions about what we can afford And I know I'm preaching to the choir, right? I know that members of the council, the staff all of us here know that the rent is really high and that buying a home is out of reach for so many. And so today I wanna lend my support for a budget allocation. I'm certainly not in the weeds on all of the considerations that you all are having to balance but wherever it makes sense to hire additional staff so we can really take on this tremendous challenge in meeting our housing demands in and around this beautiful city I know we can feel in our own ways the ways that the pain and suffering of the housing crisis hits home for each and all of us.

And, I've seen firsthand how staffing limitations can really hinder both responsiveness to challenges around housing but also visionary dreams and goals and aspirations that we can achieve so Today, again I urge you to prioritize the hiring of staff dedicated to addressing some of these issues and really appreciate your time and consideration.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:57:10

Thank you. Our next in-person speaker is Andrew Schafus followed by Mary Michael.

CommentAndrew ChafosProposedself-stated1:57:19

Good evening Council. My name is Andrew Chafos and I'm a Goleta tenant. I'm here to comment in support of the City of Goleta hiring a new full-time staffer who would support housing policies and implementing said policies. It's my understanding that there is just one full time staffer at the moment allocating to support housing policies in Goleta, and especially for this reason I think it's imperative that the city spends money on another staffer so that existing and future housing policies can be implemented with sufficient support. Along the same line I'm here again to advocate for Goleta implementing a rent stabilization program that is just as strong if not stronger than the one currently being worked out in Santa Barbara.

As we know this is one of the most expensive places to rent in the country and I personally know several people in my apartment complex have been pushed out due to the high cost of rent specifically, rent increases at the maximum legal amount being raised year over year. My complex consistently raises That's basically just under the amount allowed by the Tenant Protection Act, which ranges to be about five to ten percent.

And my next door neighbor was personally pushed out by that and I know several others that were facing a similar situation. I would like to add since the budget was being discussed tonight that rent stabilization I recognize there is an upstart cost and on that end I would like to echo Mrs. B's comments which include a recommendation to pursue grants and other funding sources to support just those additional housing staffers already since it sounds like they have a backlog of work and also a future rent stabilization policy, especially with the upstart costs. I hope council hires another housing staffer and also starts seriously considering and moving in the direction of creating a strong rent stabilization program for Goleta tenants. Thank

not transcribed≈23s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:59:27

you. Our

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:59:30

next in-person speaker is Mary Michael. This will be followed by Crescenda Silvers

1:59 – 2:0714 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:59:38

Hi everyone, my name is Mary. So I came here a month ago to ask for rent stabilization ordinance and stronger tenant protections. I told you how frustrating it is to live here when the cost of living doesn't match wages and it's hard to want to stay here when all of your community members continue to get priced out and you can't even afford to give back to where you live.

So I also stayed last month until the end of the meeting and I listened to you all give engaged, get into engaged debate and give thoughtful questions about how to pay for these additional staff members. And while I really appreciated the really thoughtful questions and the careful consideration, I am here to tell you that like there needs to be more urgency about how we treat housing.

We need to get this additional housing staffing member, that needs to happen now. That needed to happen a long time ago and we can't really afford to wait on getting that additional housing staffing member even more in the future. The cost of living here is already high. It's already too high. Renters are already desperate for a more affordable solution when it comes to housing And landlords who are abusive are already making a killing, making so much unchecked profit taking advantage of that desperation.

The problem is already here and it's already festering. So again we really need to treat this housing issue as a more urgent problem and we need to move forward with hiring this additional staffing member and consider hiring more in the future. I also want to emphasize that delaying those kinds of staffing decisions, adding more housing staff, it's not a silent decision.

Delaying that kind of gives the impression that the cost or that the quality of life of Goleta residents here is not your priority and that abusive landlords can continue as they have. But taking it on as a more urgent problem, like approaching it more aggressively trying to find a way to really figure out affordable housing here. That's how you show good faith in people who elected you and people that you're serving. So please move forward with hiring an additional housing staffing member.

And please treat this as urgently as it affects the rest of us. Thank you. Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:02:14

Our next, our last in-person speaker is Crescenda Silvers. And then we will move to our Zoom speakers. For those of you on the Zoom webinar please use the raised hand icon if you wish to speak to this item.

CommentCrescenda SilversProposedself-stated2:02:26

Thank you. Good evening Madam Mayor, Council Members my name is Crescenda Silvers. I didn't prepare anything. I really am just here in support of the other speakers and the additional hire of expanding your housing department so I want to support that in the budget and I really couldn't even say anything to elaborate or improve on the comments that have already been presented.

I would like to appreciate Councilmember Kiriakou's comments about the DEI position. It is the first time hearing about the change and again, I may not fully understand it but to me it kind of sounds like you created the title and had some challenges filling executing the work, and so now you're changing the title. And I really just want to emphasize that the community is paying attention and that we hope that by erasing the title and the letters and the words, that you are not erasing the work or if the work wasn't fully being done, that you're not erasing the councils and staff in the cities Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:04:10

That concludes the in-person speakers. We'll now move to the Zoom speakers, Olivia Uribe. If you'll please unmute yourself, you'll have three minutes to speak.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:28

No, no. You had your opportunity and there's someone already on Zoom that wants to speak.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:04:34

Olivia are you on?

CommentOlivia Uribe MutalProposedself-stated2:04:36

I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:04:36

am.

CommentOlivia Uribe MutalProposedself-stated2:04:38

Good evening Mayor and Council. My name is Olivia Uribe Mutal and while I live in Carpinteria, I am a Dos Pueblos High School and UCSB grad and my parents live in Goleta and I spend every Sunday there so kind of one-seventh Goletano. I work in local government and I'm speaking tonight in my personal capacity I want to commend both staff and the City Council on a thoughtful and fiscally responsible budget.

And I just wanted to comment on the proposed staffing changes as someone who works in local government, I've seen firsthand how dramatically both housing and emergency management responsibilities have expanded over the last decade. In housing, the state is no longer focused on just housing allocations and planning documents. It's focused on whether cities are actually implementing housing programs and delivering housing options.

Cities are responsible for administering affordable housing requirements, responding to tenant protection issues, managing compliance obligations and navigating an increasingly complex state regulatory environment. And also in emergency management has evolved beyond maintaining plans and coordinating drills. Today's emergency management professionals are responsible for regulatory compliance Regional coordination, disaster recovery, FEMA reimbursements, public preparedness and organizational resilience.

I myself have benefited as the emergency manager from two neighboring jurisdictions for the knowledge of your emergency coordinator who really fills the role of an emergency manager. The recommendations in the staff report appear to recognize the level of responsibility these programs carry and help ensure that the city of Goleta has the capacity necessary to meet the state and federal requirements. Thank you for your time, and thank you for your continued service to the Goleta community.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:06:26

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:06:28

I have no more speakers for this item Madam Mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:06:30

Okay all right then we'll go into more council questions I'm going to also close the public testimony portion. Any more questions from council? No, okay. Okay, I guess we're ready to look at the recommendations. Mr. Rosen shall we take them one at a time or read them do it as a whole there's quite a few.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:07:07

Thank you Mary. It's a good question for this item. I would actually recommend we have the clerk read all of them into the record, because there is proposed changes that require an oral report under the Brown Act as part of staff's recommendation. We want to ensure before council goes into deliberation that those are provided which is part of the recommendations on it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:29

Okay thank you.

2:07 – 2:1313 turns

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated2:07:37

Sorry, can I get clarification if council supports the personnel requests?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:44

Say that again. I'm

CommentLuke RiosProposedself-stated2:07:45

sorry. Can I get clarification of City Council supports the personnel request that's being recommended?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:49

Sure yes absolutely please do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:07:53

and in just a note for the record the recommendations can be read in that include the oral report and then council can still deliberate on whether they want to include personal good

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:08:03

I think that was yeah okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:08:06

So I would actually recommend, I think if we have our clerk just read them to accomplish that Brown Act requirement and then council can deliberate on the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:08:14

specifics. Thank you for your help.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:08:18

Recommendation A, adopt resolution 26 next in order entitled a resolution of the City Council of the city of Goleta California amending the two-year budget plan for fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27 and five year capital improvement program. And B, adopt resolution 26 next in order entitled the Resolution of the City Council of the city of Goleta California Adopting the city's GAN limit for fiscal years 2026, 27 and C. Receive an oral report read by the City Clerk or staff summarizing recommendation of final action on compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits to city executive employees. One, for all executive employees amend the city's monthly flexible benefit plan allowance such that Roman numeral one effective July 1, 2026. For employees enrolled with two or more dependent More than one dependent, pardon me.

The allowance shall be $1,640 per month or 85% of the monthly premium cost for the CalPERS Gold PPO Plan Region 2 rounded up to the nearest $10 whichever is higher. All other tiers remain unchanged. Roman numeral II effective January 1, 2027 for employees enrolled with one dependent. The allowance shall be $1700 per month or 85 percent of the monthly premium cost For CalPERS Gold PPO Plan Region 2, rounded up to the nearest $10, whichever is higher and employees enrolled with more than one dependent, the allowance shall be $1,730 per month or 85% of the monthly premium cost. For the CalPERS Gold PPO Plan Region 2, rounded up to the nearest $10 whichever is highest The employee-only tier remains unchanged. And two, for all executive employees effective July 1, 2026 increase the city paid long term disability benefit which currently provides 60% of monthly earnings up to a maximum of $6,000 per month to a maximum of $9,000 per month and establish a new employer paid short term disability benefit not currently provided, that will cover 66.67% of salary up to $2,500 per week with the city paying the full premium and D, adopt Resolution 26 next in order entitled The Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta California amending the City of Goleta schedule of authorized positions, the City of Goleta Salary Schedule and Classification Plan and the Funded Positions Compensation Plan Schedule for fiscal year 2025-26 and fiscal year 2026-27 Amending the personnel rules, establishing an employer paid short-term disability benefit for unrepresented management and executive employees.

And authorizing the application of the hiring incentive policy to certain positions and E, adopt resolution 26 next in order entitled a resolution of the City Council of the city of Goleta California approving side letter agreements with SCIU local 620 Thank you. Good job.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:11:33

Okay so we're gonna go into deliberation or do we have Mr. Rio did you want to make any comments? No okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:11:48

I was just going to add, Madam Mayor, I think to the point that Mr. Rio is trying to make now that they've all been read into the record which as was pointed out is a requirement. I think there is the ability now when the council gets there to approve all this on one motion but at that point included in the motion would be the positions or not and that would be reflected then.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:12:10

Okay. Mayor Pro Tem Smith?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:12:14

Yes, I support the staff recommendation. You know we've been given a budget that fully funds our contingency and other reserves. I believe that the adjustments proposed are justified in thinking about our current work in the planning department as it relates to the housing element everything that's transpired in the last year in terms of mobile home parks and the ongoing future work as it relates our general mobile home park ordinance, as well as implementation of our current tenant protection ordinance. I think that position is justified and I think the only amendment I would request is to move the Jenna Drive crosswalk beacon and Fire Station 10 to the active CIP list pending further discussion. Thank you.

2:13 – 2:182 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:13:12

Council Member Reyes-Martin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:13:15

Thank you, I'll start with just some general comments and I shared this at our last discussion but again a lot of appreciation not just to Mr. Rio and his excellent team but really to the whole city. This is you know a budget across all departments and all the great work that is done as a city and it's really the city staff that helped make that possible And it does feel really great to be in a position and have a budget presented to us that is structurally balanced, that funds are reserved to our set policy which again is 33%, which is really fantastic.

And I wanted to say a little bit about that. I think for a city of our size, it is so, so important to have A level of reserves at that level. I think of it similarly to how we thought about it on the Goleta School District as a community funded or basic aid school district. Thank you very much. drastic changes that would affect, you know, any number of big funding sources.

And that has served the school district well to have that level of a reserve and that cautious approach. It is clearly served this city well To exercise fiscal restraint when we need to. To be really cautious, to be really mindful, to have really great dialogue. I think everyone on this council brings questions in a different perspective that get us to a place where we are so thoughtful about not just one-time expenses but ongoing expenses And it really requires that level of discipline and saying no sometimes, and planning for the things that are really important to us.

And that's really a partnership between the council staff and our community. So I think I'm really glad we're in this position. It is that balance. It's the balance of the positives that I've mentioned and the balance of the caution. We have a lot of CIP projects that we really, really want to be able to accomplish. Those all require funding. It requires a plan to get there, a plan to fund them.

We know that our pavement needs, you know, we gotta continue to work on that I'm going to channel a little bit of Councilmember Kasdan who I know couldn't be here tonight but shared his comments and they're part of the public comment. We know that we can't invest $20 million a year to get our CIP. The pavement condition index, I think. Is that what it is? PCI, yes. PCI, not COP. Up to the level we want it to be.

But we focus on what we can do. We can allocate 6 million. I agree with him that we should continue to strive to add more to that base amount every year. To try to get ahead of it. I appreciate so much staff and their efforts to both value engineer and think of other creative options like the new equipment that we are starting to roll out. That's a huge area that I know all of our residents really expect this city to address those basic services.

As was mentioned, we've got some renegotiation of some major contracts coming up. So we should be cautious about our expenses, kind of thinking ahead to the possibility of that needing to be an increase. And so many other things that come up. So I take it as a big responsibility of the council and the trust that we have in our residents to continue to have this cautious and optimistic approach to our budget At our last meeting, I had a lot of questions about the positions.

Like with so many other things, I needed some time for it to marinate a little bit and I had a lot of questions of staff for how this would work, what's the need? Is it to address existing workload? What's the process that staff took to evaluate the need for additional staff. I really value that we have a lean staff, but a mighty one and one that has enough work and we don't want people to be overworked and we wanna be able to plan for any growth.

On city staff so with all the additional information and So many of my questions answered I can support the staff recommendations As they were presented to us tonight And again, you know just continue to have that Kind of cautiously optimistic approach to what the next year and on will bring. Thank you

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:18 – 2:335 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:53

I'm going to jump in. Usually, I go last but I have to say that first of all, I really want to thank past and present current council and staff for always being so fiscally responsible. I think they laid the groundwork, the first city council They had a lot of work to do and they did it. And we've been in a good position for a long time, and I really appreciate the hard work that's put into this. I will say that I have had folks at different events tell me how they actually like watching our meetings from time to time, and that we seem so unified That was the word that she used. You're unified, you may not always agree exactly but you're respectful and I think that's how you get things done and I think that's why we are doing so well. So I'm very proud of the council and our staff and I thank them for all their hard work and you know I was one of those at the last meeting where I was like I don't know there's so many uncertainties.

I was worried But after the report and I know that we're going to be cautious moving forward Because we just don't know. We don't know what federal funding might Affect the county which will then affect us And that'll be social services so You know, we're gonna keep a watchful eye on all that and and see where it goes but I think we're in a good position I there was a time when the 33% Reserve was questioned whether it should be not as much and that didn't go very far.

So I'm glad we have that reserve, so we're doing well and again thank you to everyone. Great presentation, thank you Luke. Council Member Carriaco? And I will support the recommendations

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:21:09

So I also was one of the people that had a fair number of questions last time, and I was also the council member that did ask that we get information on what positions were vacant. And the reason why that was important to me is I felt like if we were being asked to approve a budget that was going to look over a five-year forecast and tell us that before you get to the end of that forecast, we project deficits I felt I had a responsibility to have as many facts as possible so I could make an informed decision based on facts.

Two things have happened since then, one is I got the information I asked for about the positions and the other is our staff has sharpened their pencils, looked closer and are no longer projecting a deficit as soon as 2029. That changes things. And I think when you get more information, you should be able to be moved by facts. And I am moved by facts. So my request was for information.

My intention was informational so that I could make a better decision and I am prepared to support going forward with those recruitments and go forward with the positions. Particularly, I think it's important that we focus on two of the things that are really on people's minds. One is housing and the other is the condition of our roads. These positions help us address both of those challenges.

I do want to take issue a little bit with the depiction of how much money this city is spending on housing. You can't talk about housing without talking about homelessness, and this is a city that not that long ago did not spend very much money working to address homelessness. Now, not only are we spending somewhere in the neighborhood of I think a million dollars on an annual basis both in terms of prevention and general support for existing folks that are dealing with the existing challenge of homelessness but probably the hardest Council committee to get on might be the Homeless Standing Issues Advisory Committee.

The two council members that are on that committee have a lot of tenure on that committee because there is so much interest on this council in doing something about that, and that's how you get cooperation and a 5-0 vote from a prior city council to do something like Buenos Aires, to do something when There were voices in the community that were telling us, is that location really the best place for permanent supportive housing for homeless? That's the entrance to Old Town.

What does that say and is that really the element that you want in Old Town with where you're trying to go with Old Town? And this council and prior councils have really put a lie to the notion that supporting homeless individuals with housing means that you are disimproving a neighborhood, that you are making a neighborhood worse. I think that the resources and the effort that this city has dedicated towards homelessness and housing have made this community better and have made this community more tolerant and has made this community more welcoming.

I tend to look at our housing investment. in that larger sense of both housing and homelessness. And so I feel like, yes we can do more and we must do more but I do feel like we're doing better. Perhaps we don't emote urgency with our comments sometimes. I think we are a reflective group. I think we are a group that doesn't like to one-up each other or try to get the perfect quote for the paper. I think this is a group that really just thinks deeply and passionately about policy, and I'm really proud to serve with all of you.

I think the other thing that we really care about right now is pavement and it's not just because we like roads. We have an affordability crisis, not just in this community but in the state. And when driving on a road is something you have to do to get to your job, you have to do to get food for your kids, to support your family. The condition of those roads really matters.

I represent Old Town Goleta that's a significant portion of my district and so The something like $150 million that we're investing in Old Town between new roads, bridges, bike paths, infrastructure, flood control improvements is basically removing a tax on Old Town residents who can least afford to have their flat tire or broken axle because they hit a bad pothole.

And so I feel like We're doing a lot better than we used to when it comes to pavement, and we still have a long ways to go. And there's different reasons why we ended up where we are but what matters is we're here now. We recognize that we can and must do better when it comes to pavement. I think we're all asking good questions about how can we get there? How can we use value engineering But we're also doing other things. I mean, we're not just doing value engineering.

We're also accomplishing multiple objectives. When we pave a road now, we're not just paving it exactly the way it was and we're not just striping it exactly the way it was. Parking in a way where it provides protection to people that are cyclists, which helps kids get to school safer. Which helps seniors recreate more safely. Which helps just folks get around more safely and our lives are richer for it.

And so I think we're not only doing value engineering, we're doing safety engineering. We're doing vision zero engineering. We'r edoing the things that we need to do to make this a great place to live work and play. And so, I'm really proud of this budget and I'm really proud of some of the things that we haven't talked about so much tonight that we're setting up. When we talk about the budget next year, we'll have a new multimodal train station And I encourage us as we start entering this new fiscal year to think about that space not just as a place where you catch the train, not just as a place that'll be a transit hub to catch the bus.

It can be an event space. I was just in Denver at their Union Station and That train station had a DJ out in front, there was a bar. There was a food truck serving food. There were kids playing cornhole. Like that space, there's going to be a lot of room and a lot of opportunity to make that new public infrastructure a community space. And I would encourage us to look for those opportunities, to partner with community members, to partner with local businesses to fully utilize and activate that space.

And the last thing I'll say is I'm just so proud that this budget is going to allow us to have people staffing the new splash pad in Old Town And this budget is going to provide the funding and the follow through on the new mural at the Carpinteria. There's just so many little things that make a community a great place to live, and makes a community a home that are happening. They don't always get talked about, they don't always get attention.

I know it's really easy to focus on You know, deficits versus surpluses and new positions and what position is the best position. But I think it's important that we not just focus on the big things but that We make time and create space for the small things that really matter in people's daily lives, the community garden, the mural, the splash pad, the bike paths. Just the little things that will creep into our lives and make them richer.

So I really just want to finish by thanking staff for working so hard sharpening their pencils being patient with us when we had questions Being patient with us when we didn't just say yes, because sometimes we're just constitutionally challenged saying yes the first time. We need to go through our process and things need to marinate as I think was the language that I heard earlier.

When you're a small city it's not easy always to keep adding positions. Not that long ago, we added a lot of positions in public works. But I think when you look now at all the things, the big six project lists that we're talking about now, where would we be with all of that if we didn't have the engineers that we hired three or four years ago? If we didn't create the succession planning in that department and create some leadership opportunities and provide some admin support?

Sometimes you have to spend a little bit of money to fully reap the benefit of all that capital money that you're spending, because you end up with a lot of inefficiencies and a lot of do-overs and a lot of delays. And I see Project Connect happening. I see our public works staff working so hard. I see our library staff working so hard with general services to get the new library open. Another thing we haven't really talked about tonight but we're gonna have a new library at the end of this budget.

That's gonna be so cool. And we did it together. And it'll be accessible to everybody, not just most everybody. That library will be a place for all of us. So I'm really proud of our city and I'm really proud of this budget and I'm glad to support with the positions.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:32:25

Thank you. So we will close the public hearing. We've already had the recommendations so we should be entertaining a motion at this point? Is that correct? Yes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:32:42

I just want to note as staff read into the record earlier, there's a note in red at the top that council could consider the recommendations right into the record A through F. If Council's inclined, it would be as amended to reflect the two new positions and the four reclassifications. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:33:02

Madam Mayor I would also add if the council concurs with Council Member Smith's suggestion to move those two projects, the Jenna Beacon project and Fire Station 10 from the long-range CIP to the five year CIP. That's something that staff can easily accommodate as part of the motion right now so I would include that in the motion as well

2:33 – 2:3812 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:33:27

I think with the beacon, it's not that I don't support it but I would want to look at What are all of the kind of crosswalk improvement things? I guess that we don't have the list in front of us for me to see like, is that the best one on that list to move to five-year or did we move other ones to the shorter term. So I would just have some more questions about that one but the fire station I definitely

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:33:58

remember. Can I jump in on this one when we did the improvements to the park that's right there. That one of the conditions I remember, I kept saying we have to get a crosswalk which they put in but we also really need to get a flashing beacon sooner than later because there are so many kids that live right across the street and they're older and some of them are crossing by themselves however The speed on Acai Real, they can go fast. And sure we can have law enforcement there and we do as much as we can but there's also a curve in the road when you're going west that if kids are crossing, they're going fast. I see it as something, you know, I can agree with moving it up. Actually, I'm surprised I didn't say anything because I saw it and I went oh well that's, you know, I thought we were gonna do that sooner than later especially after the park now is very popular.

Kids love it. They're going there a lot so... Well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:35:06

thank you. With that, I can support both of us. Okay

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:35:10

good one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:35:11

So what do we need for the motion since it's already been read? Is it sufficient to say So moved as amended, or do we need more than

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:35:20

that? Council Member- As additionally amended. Yes I would say the motion would be to move forward recommendations A through F with the amendments regarding the change on the two items for the long term CIP that were read into the record to move back to the active five year list and to include the two authorized positions and four reclassifications as amended.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:35:46

That would be my motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:35:50

I'll

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:35:50

second.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:35:51

Okay, roll call vote.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. I'll second. Okay, roll call
Show transcript
Council Members please lock in your votes. Council Member Reyes-Martin? Aye. Council Member Carrialco? Aye. Council Member Cazen is absent. Mayor Pro Tempore Smith? Yes. Mayor Parodi? Aye,

ayes have it with the wedding, absent. Do we need a five-minute break?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:37:03

Hello, everyone. You.

2:39 – 2:442 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:39:44

You. . . You're welcome.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:43:30

Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

2:47 – 2:5410 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:47:47

Okay, we're going to bring this meeting back to order. You could read the next item into the agenda.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:47:52

Yes thank you Madam Mayor that'll be Item D1 policy to implement new Brown Act amendments regarding meeting disruption procedures pursuant to Senate Bill 707. All

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:48:00

right thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:48:04

Good evening Madam Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, members of the Council. So SB 707 enacted last year amended the Brown Act to require all eligible legislative bodies to adopt on or before July 1 a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from participating remotely. This is a major update to the Brown Act, which is California's open meeting law. It reflects more modern meeting practices coming out of the COVID period.

The biggest shifts are going to be around remote public participation and technology disruption procedures and tonight's item is about putting those required policies and processes in place. So, the city is now what's termed as an eligible legislative body and all of the eligible legislative bodies are required to provide remote public attendance and real-time public comment during their meetings of the primary legislative bodies. So for us it's a City Council The city does conduct hybrid meetings, allowing both in-person and two way remote participation. This is consistent with SB 707 requirements and this has been in place since 2020. We've been doing this since COVID.

So to comply with state law, the city must formalize procedures for responding to disruptions in two-way remote public access. And thanks to BBK our attorneys they provided us Exhibit A to this report which is a proposed council policy establishing a framework for responding to a disruption and telephonic or internet services when providing the required two-way remote public access to City Council meetings So the policy is intended to comply with the requirements of the amendment to the Brown Act.

It clarifies the procedures for the presiding officer, the city clerk, well presiding officer, the mayor, the city clerk and staff to follow in the event of telephonic or internet service disruption we've been through that a little bit It ensures staff makes and documents good faith efforts to diagnose and restore two-way remote public access as quickly as possible.

It defines how and when the City Council may reconvene either by continuing the meeting or adjourning if service is not restored. So just to kind of walk you through how this might look, I'm going to ask David to share here. And this is their policy. This isn't in the proposed policy. So the presiding officer or clerk will announce a disruption to the public and then the presiding officers shall call for recess of the open session and may convene the legislative body in an authorized closed session consistent with the Brown Act.

Things around that too, you know. The recess shall last for one hour or until services restored whichever is earlier During the recess Goleta staff shall make a good-faith effort to diagnose and restore the disrupted service So in reconvening the open So in reconvening the open session After the expiration of the hour, if service has not been restored, the presiding officer or clerk shall report on the status of staff's efforts to restore remote access services. And the City Council may reconvene to do either A, B, or C and that is adjourn the meeting Extend the recess to allow staff more time to make a good faith effort to restore remote access services or see Continue the open session portion of the meeting by adopting by roll call vote.

The following are substantially similar finding and that finding is The City of Goleta has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interests in remote public access. Upon adoption of the finding, the Council may continue the open session portion of the meeting despite the fact that remote access services has not been restored.

You know so remote public access is here in the meeting for those people there are participating remotely but we do have other venues for the public to watch our meetings as well

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:52:44

Yes, there also is the city's YouTube page as well as the city stream on the cityofgaleta.org website and channel 19 of course

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:52:53

So staffs before you with a recommendation to adopt resolution number 2026 next in order entitled a resolution of the City Council of the city of Goleta, California adopting a new council policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service during the City Council meeting. But before that I did want to ask our city attorney which they provided a lot of information for this if he had anything to add

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:53:18

Thank you Ms. Lopez, nothing to add I think as Ms. Lopez described we have a lot of new changes to the Brown Act and potentially more coming in the next year or two in light of this bill so this is a necessary component but it's kind of the tip of the iceberg on everything the clerk's team is doing to get ready for a July 1st date in which a lot of these new requirements go into effect

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:41

I have a question on this does not pertain to our commission and Commission meetings or committee meetings do they have they don't that's no

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:53:52

the according to this the eligible legislative body is the City Council, okay?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:54:01

Okay any other questions Someone like to make a motion Public comments

2:54 – 2:569 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:54:12

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. I have no speaker slips for those of you on the zoom webinar who's to speak to this item please use raised hand icon and i will call on you. And I'm seeing none Madam Mayor

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:54:26

entertain a motion

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:54:30

I would move that we adopt a resolution number 26 next in line entitled the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California adopting a new city council policy addressing a disruption of telephonic or internet service during city council meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:54:49

Second?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:54:50

Okay. Roll call vote please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Council members please lock in your votes. Council Member Reyes-Martin? Aye. Council Member Curiaco? Aye. Council Member Kasdan is absent. Mayor Pro Tem Porce Smith? Yes. And Mayor Parodi? Aye,

ayes have it. Okay do we have any council comments or standing committees Thank You Miss Lopez I've

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:55:32

got one. I just want the council to know our office is tracking there's a flurry of activity in Sacramento right now with some of the pending legislation So our office is looking into that, of course unsurprisingly There's a fair amount having to do with housing And I'm particularly interested in some of the transit-oriented development changes that are making their way through the legislature.

And then, I also just wanted to wish the city luck on the drone show. I'm sorry I can't be there this year so happy 4th of July!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:56:02

Madam Mayor, I actually had a council comment. I actually did have a council comment. Can we go back? Okay. Yes. I just wanted to note that on Thursday June 4th, I attended the Bold Futures Brunch for Girls Inc., and also thank you to Council Member Reyes-Martin for being a sponsor of that event. And then on the 5th, I attended the Communify Annual Champions Dinner in my capacity as Chair of the Board of Communify.

And that's it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:37

OK. If we have nothing else, I will say meeting adjourned.