UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:1224 turns
Mayor Pro Tem Dirk Starbuck.
Present.
Mayor James Mosby.
dealing with mess and get messy dealing with mess. And yet you choose to dwell with us and you love us so much and I'm very grateful for that love. You love us so much Lord you give us a city where we get to have rain and recharge our aquifers. And we have city employees, Lord, that do great things. And so we're very thankful for everyone here. We ask the Lord that you would give the greatest of your wisdom to your people.
I pray, Lord that everyone that will have to stand at this lectern to give a brief, that your spirit will be upon them and they would speak with such excellence they may go back home and say, I wonder was that really me? Lord we know that you're with us and we're grateful for that. In your name we pray,
amen. I
pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible
No presentations as I take it, right? Go right down to the City Manager's Report.
Thank you Mayor. I'm excited to share that Parks and Rec is hosting two great coming up events, workshops for kids. Speak with confidence. It will be Sunday February 22nd. You'll be held at the Dick Dewey Center from 2-4. Spots are available for use between ages 8 through 17. The workshop will be led by a special guest, Miss California Junior Teen Genova Walker. This is a great opportunity for kids to learn how to introduce themselves with confidence and they can use it in school, jobs, bunch of things. It's $15 registration and I encourage kids to get involved and do that.
The library has some fantastic programs that they have coming up next week. The Soil Explorers Program, this class encourages children between ages 8 and 12 to learn more about gardening and include information from master gardeners. The workshop is always popular and registration opens tomorrow, February 18th. The program will be held Wednesday, February 25th from 2 to 3 30.
Just wanted to remind everybody that we are still looking for people to be approved lenders for the first-time homebuyer program. There will be five slots, and those applications are due by Friday, February 20th. I want to take a moment and let everybody know that the Vandenberg Space Force Base is hosting its first event in a speaker series titled Mission Update.
This is a community presentation. It's scheduled for this Friday, February 20th from 4 to 6 at the Dick Dewey Center. Presenters will be from the base and we'll discuss Vandenberg's mission, natural defense operations, and ongoing research. And I encourage people to go and listen to that. With the upcoming storms, I think it's good that everybody takes a chance to register with ReadySBC.
They send out alerts via text, phone calls and emails and courtesies for residents with weather reports, warning evacuations and more. And you can also use the Genesis mapping system to look at what's going on at your address. They also have sandbags at Station 51 on G Street if you need those. I want to take a moment and give an update on the AI-assisted dispatch software, Hyper.
We launched that last week, and I wanted to highlight a few statistics for the first week. They assisted 591 calls for a total cumulative duration of 17 hours and 12 minutes. The average duration of each call was 1 minute and 44 seconds. And I think they have some charts on the next page there. Some of the things that they did, including animal incidences, general inquiries, petty theft, noise disturbance. Really happy for the dispatch and the police department for getting that out. And I see that's really going to work well. So look forward to saving dispatch time.
And that's all I have.
Thank you. Unfortunately, fortunately I had an opportunity to call PD and vandalism on my properties and went through the AI dispatch and I was impressed with it. It did a very solid job and actually apologized for my pain which I thought was, you know, AI knowing emotions was pretty interesting but A question for you. What I've noticed here in the last couple days, and I know the river's kind of consolidating that but there's been a lot of open air in your face drug use in town. Is there something we can do to address this? Do we need more ordinances? What do we need to do on this?
I know when the weather gets rough a lot of them come out and they're not hidings but I'll let the chief talk if he wants to add anything.
You know with the call volume that the officers have, they try to pay attention to that as much as they possibly can. But when they're going to a higher priority call, they don't always catch them all the time but they were out today working on some of those problems and dealing with them. So as we get the opportunities, and hopefully with the three that we have in the academy right now, we'll start seeing numbers go up on patrol and specialty positions like homeless liaison and marijuana compliance officer who They were very, very good at that because they weren't controlled by the radio. The problem that we have in dealing with some of these things that you're seeing is the officers are being dispatched to calls and can't break from those unless it's life-threatening because it's a higher priority.
When we have a team out there that's not controlled by the radio then they can go pick those different things and deal with them and make a big change. So we're getting there. We just gotta get our staffing all the way through.
Well, so one of the complications I have is the Catch-22. Like the old Lobote's restaurant there, they're hitting that one pretty hard and I think I went out without even looking very hard. I counted 19 out there that were either passed out under the influence or using right then and there. And again without these buildings filling up we're short revenue. I know when we need assistance we call Highway Patrol do we need to... Is there some task force that we can reach out to for a day or two to help us with this, or?
The type of task force you're thinking about typically deals with the higher level narcotics problem like more on the dealing side not the using side. But once again I think the public will see a huge change in these kind of problems once we can get that next few officers back out on the streets and allow us to be able to do some of things were doing maybe a year ago.
I know just in my viewing, just about anybody who's using is also dealing. I know it's a smaller level but in watching what's going on and people reaching out to me, you know look at McDonalds and stuff they're just...I was at the US Bank and then at the drive-thru It closed yesterday, but I gave the city manager a picture. The guy's got his propane bottle there and he's aluminum foiled out and he's cooking up a fat load of fentanyl.
What I'd love for anybody that sees that going on is to immediately call the dispatch and let us know so that we can send a unit right away while it's happening. Unfortunately sometimes it gets slowed down if you communicate in the manner which you did. So if you just pick up the phone and call 911 saying somebody's over here using We might be able to get there a little bit faster and be able to deal with it. And on top of that, they create a call for that. So it's not about do I see it or don't I? It's being assigned now and they're able to deal with it.
All right. I expect a bunch of phone calls coming soon. That's fine. I know I've done them in the past. Unfortunately, the time somebody gets there, well, they're either calling 911 for the ambulance They've moved on and such, so I did make a call here the other night and waited an hour-and-a-half.
We're a busy department.
Give you heads up on that. Maybe we can reach out and get some help with the sheriff or something, I don't know but it's pretty rampant right now. The 99 cent store, talking to the veterinarian there, many days they're afraid to go outside of what's going
on. We've actually addressed that with the squads They're going to be talking about that at the briefings, that specific location to make sure that they're dealing with it.
May have somebody looking at that building so we don't want to scare them away. All right thank you any other questions
for the City Manager? Council Member Ball. I just wanted to follow up on that Chief maybe you can help me just understand this in context a little bit obviously this is an issue it's facing our city but resources are always limited from my understanding roughly how many calls for service are you is the department getting a day on average?
Oh I don't know I mean We average about 38,000 calls a year. To remember the people that are handling that there's 24 officers assigned to patrol and they work a supervisor, a corporal and maybe three to four officers so that's why when you think there's 10 officers out there working we're never staffed like that. So two domestic calls. Those four officers are already tied up, and then now the supervisors are rolling out and handling whatever else comes in on a priority level.
So that includes if there's a car accident, you have to respond to that. Correct. So on a good day the City of Lompoc has a supervisor and how many officers that can respond to any type of
call? Three to four plus a supervisor and then if it's a major we have the detectives in the detective bureau but they won't typically roll out on a traffic collision unless it's
0:12 – 0:3011 turns
Responding to that, I think it's important for us to understand what our limited resources are. Not to make excuses. We only have four officers the whole time. If there's 12 people using drugs across town, we're already hamstrung there. Not to mention responding to higher priority domestic violence assaults and so forth. So again if we want to do something about it, we either need to get some help from the outside or maybe staff up?
Thank you. Any other questions? All right. Let's move on to public comment on consent calendar. We got a lot of stuff on consent calendar tonight. We've got approval and ratification of expenditures for payroll of $2.1 million. Voucher for 470,000. Another voucher for 1.4 million. We're adopting ordinance number 1742-26 amending section 21250 of the Lompoc Munico to establish new acting city manager designation procedures Number three is introduction to Ordinance 174326, amending Section 13605017.628.010 Chapter 916 of the Lompoc Municipal Code regarding admin fines, graffiti control and property nuisance.
Number four is approval of change order request purchase order with WSP USA Incorporated Landfill Gas Compliance and Air Toxic Hotspots Act. Number five, introduction of ordinance number 174426, reducing the city manager's purchasing authority. Anybody for consent calendar? Any council members wish to pull an item?
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
I wish to pull item number three. Items pulled will be immediately before the second oral communication near the end of the meeting. Anybody seeing nobody rise, we'll close oral comment on
consent calendar. Bring it back for a
motion. Councilor, well you've got a question. Well I was gonna have some questions about three but we'll talk about that later. I guess I just had a general question about number five from staff. Why are we reducing your purchasing authority from 220 to 100? What's that about? That was part of the budget process. Is that a good thing? Does that reduce staff effort? Is that more work for us as a council or...
Yeah, just more stuff will be coming to you guys to look at and approve between 100 and 220. Awesome,
thank you.
Okay motion, anybody got a motion to approve the amendment of consent or what do you want? What we got? You guys fighting? What's your motion Council Member
Vega? I'll make the motion to accept everything but item number three. Okay, a motion to remain your
items by Vega seconded by Bridge. Let's go vote. That passes 5-0. Staff presentation announcements electric division capital improvement plan I think that's why everybody is here in the audience for that one, right?
Good evening. This is Mike Luther, Utility Director. I want to introduce John McMurray. He's with our consultant working on our utility electric utility model and he has a Put together a presentation of projections for capital improvement projects that will be needed based on their data they've developed.
Good evening Mayor, City Council, members of the city staff and residents here in Lompoc. My name is John McMurray and I work with Qalis. We're a consulting engineering firm. We've been hired by the City of Lompoc to perform a study for four major tasks one of those that I'm talking about tonight. As the forecast to look out into the future with a biennial plan, which is a two year plan of five year plan in the long range plan 20 years into Subdivisions, new commercial buildings, complexes. Everything that's on the horizon that we're aware of working with the estimator Dave Campo and your team here in your city staff so we've built the model and we looked into the future and this presentation is going to present What we found and where we believe, you know the forecast is.
We've done this with utilities around the United States and I'd like to share that presentation so I'd like to begin with that please next slide So again, my name is John McMurray and I work with CLOS. I have a staff of two engineers, electrical engineers, highly skilled engineers who are doing work around the U.S. and North America up in Canada too. And we're going to be talking about the assumptions, the forecasted growth The system loading assessment is when we analyzed your grid, what we found. And then the substation which is also known as the receiving station. We did an asset assessment and brought in other team members to do a physical inspection of The assets inside the substation. And I want to pause here just for a second. QALYS has over 2,000 employees.
When we see a need to look at different things, we'll bring in those individuals with the expertise and they'll come in from different parts of the country. We have most of our people looking at everything here locally on the substation level are from California or Nevada. We also looked at limitations and considerations, and then we make recommendations. So next slide please.
Okay so we were retained like I said for a two year plan, a five year plan outlook on system conditions. Load growth projections and we're looking at potential improvements that need to occur based on the load growth and looking at it systematically. So we look at each of the circuits and we look at the system as a whole in the substation loading too. I'm on paragraph 2 and the key thing, one of the key things that's happening in addition to new loads are the changes with the California Air Resources Board.
And I've spoken with a CARB representative back in May or June of last year about the impacts for the utilities and they are real. I'm going to cover them in slides coming up and they're going to be increasing electrical load on the grid here. We're going to talk about the plan on what you need to do and take care, be able to take care of the grid. But also there's going to be an increase in revenues coming, a stream of revenues associated with that too.
The last paragraph is the model development I spoke about, low growth analysis. It's an annual system load modeling. We create a model, it's on top of your GIS system and it's an electrical model that simulates what the future looks like out. And it's very good for two years, five years is still pretty good, 20 years it's more of drawing with what I call like a crayon. It's a conceptual plan out in 20 years.
The recommendation is to make sure that we alleviate all overloads every year going forward, and then replace any kind of substation assets that are deteriorating. And I'm going to show you some pictures on that. The bottom diagram is just showing you the process. This is used at utilities around the U.S. and North America. Next slide please. So California is unique. Other states are following, we've been talking with utilities in Colorado and New Jersey and other utilities, large utilities are following California but you are the most progressive in trying to take care of the greenhouse gases so the CARB, California Air Resource Board has these mandates by 2030 All new home appliances will be electric. So that's the conversion of water heaters and also your central heating, so moving away from gas natural gas propane to electric In other states, in Florida I know that most everything is electric.
There are some spots that don't have it but other states have been moving in that direction also. But the second item there, the vehicles nobody is as progressive as you are by 2030 68% of all new passenger vehicle sales must be zero emission That's not used vehicles, that's new vehicles. And by 2035 that's gonna be 100% of all brand-new vehicles must be ZEV, zero emission vehicles.
And by 2045 the goal is to reach carbon neutrality. All homes, all vehicles will be fully electric. That is going to increase the grid's demand on the grid Also, there's some changes here to split dwelling units. City approval is not required anymore so that's the bottom line item and that's going to increase load to what level depends on the adoption rate.
Next slide please Okay, so we took a snapshot of what does it look like right now? And this is actually just a few months back. And on the far, on this table on the far left side are your transformers in the substation. You have three transformers. They're loaded at about 30%, plus or minus a little bit which is very nice. Most utilities, big utilities like PG&E they're running their transformers at 50, 55%. 45 to 55% probably.
Your transformers have capacity. So you're prepared for the future for several years there, but I'm gonna talk about On the right-hand side, we have the circuits. The circuits are also lightly loaded from our studies in the urban grids. The average utilization of the circuits usually big cities is running about 50%, 55% most utilities. You're in a good position right now.
However, change is coming. Due to the high feeder utilization from the CARB mandates looking out into future years anticipated growth and also the ability to be able to transfer a load among circuits to balance them out will become more challenging about five years from now. And that's where the circuits are going to be approaching about 60% loading. So, beyond 60%, is you start seeing issues with switching flexibility.
Next slide please. This is just a map of your system with the circuits colored on the right and the new loads that we're aware of in the next five years. And it's, we have it in megawatts per year so grand totals are down at the bottom This is just taking this from the city, the building group as well as the estimator and there are also some other inputs here.
It starts adding when you get to 2031, you sum up each of the bottom line megawatts. It starts increasing the load on the transformers in the substation as well as some of the circuits. Next slide please. So based on the new loads, the zero emission vehicles, ZEV, and the changes by the CARB, you know, the water heaters as well as central heating in the house.
We're seeing loads increasing down at the bottom on the table on the right. About four and a half megawatts are going to be coming in on the system. And what we did was looked at the vehicles, the replacement cycle of vehicles for the state of California and also inside the city of Lompoc. Your cycle replacement is lower. We looked at I believe it's Santa Barbara County. We're in Santa Barbara County right?
Yeah, so here in Santa Barbara County we looked at replacement of vehicles and zero emission vehicles adoption rates. You're slightly below the state and we looked at your zip codes here. So these are the numbers that are reflected in the city of Lompoc as close as we could match it. Based on the vehicles and then the water heaters. We said that there's a replacement cycle on water heaters, and then also the dwelling units we summed it all up You can see the dwelling units is not very much impact their Next slide please And so what we're seeing right now is the peak is around 22 megawatts. By 2031, about five years from now, we're going to be bumping up to about 44 plus megawatts.
I will tell you that this is not precise. This is a forecast. Could it be a little bit less than 44? Yes. Could it be a little bit more than 44? Yes, this is kind of like a middle-of-the-road projection. By 2031, the system peak increases to like I said 44.7 megawatts. There's 8.9 megawatts of known new loads. There's 13 megawatts plus of carb load projections and this is just saying based on replacement of equipment appliances in homes, vehicles and then also the new loads all combined together.
So what does that mean for the system? Next slide please. So if nothing was happening other than just new loads, you'd see the blue line. No CARB mandates, we would see something like the blue line. However, we know there are gonna be impacts to the city of Lompoc through the known EV, the known CARB mandates and the impacts from the EVs, ZEV, the appliances and such.
And so we're projecting the green line. Could it go higher? Yes, it can go. Could it go higher or lower? It can swing just a little bit up or down but that's our midline projection of what we're going to see. Okay next slide please. Okay so this is the slide you need to see as a governing body this is what we're wanting you to see right now. When you look out to about 2028 to 2032 in that range, you have to be able to see.
You're going to want to be able to make some decisions here and what we're saying is you want to plan for a new substation and the number one thing that you're gonna wanna do is number one is look to acquire the land for a substation And that would be around 2028. Do you have a, could you do it in 2027? Yes. Could you do it in 2029? You'd probably be okay if you do it in 2029 but you're gonna need to look for land for a substation and another utility where I worked we looked out 15 years and we purchased land 10 to 15 years in advance because there was rapid growth going on and the price of land was going up There may be not that is not the situation as much here, but it always is a good practice to at least have the land. Then you're not landlocked when you have to make a decision.
The land is the small cost of the overall future that you need to prepare for So number two is you're looking at preparing the land for the substation. You should be clearing, you should be preparing putting the earthwork and getting the structure ready to be able to build this substation. And then by number three, by 2032 thereabouts based on our projections, you're gonna need a new substation New substations take about five years from initial planning to energization, and we're painting the window that five-year window for you now.
I'm going to pause right here. Do you have any questions?
0:30 – 0:468 turns
Is there a spot in the city where the substation would have to – is there a corridor or segment
I'm sorry, is there a corridor? No.
Should
the substation be in the north or the south? We have a general area that we're looking at central to the city would be better because your load is center and emanates out in branches. A larger load where some of the overloads will occur out in year 5, 6, 7 on the west side is seeing more growth coming. And I would say that center is best. There are parcels of land. We just did a scout around. We're not suggesting the land for you to buy, we think that's part of what you do as a city. I've done this in years past and coordinated with the utilities but this is something the city is very capable of doing and it's just sizing up the substation for a new second substation The other thing is in the event anything happened for your substation right now, you have no backup plan right now.
There's something big happened and you would be looking at an extended outage for the city. Can you bring in a substation from elsewhere? Can you bring in a portable substation transformer from somewhere? Yes, you can probably coordinate it in an emergency situation but that takes time so Having a substation out in the window of five years or so is a good idea anyway, is to have a backup plan. Have two substations for a city relying on one substation which I've seen in my past two substations fail catastrophic failure but also I'm used to looking at over 500 substations around the southeast and central US So anyway, we're just painting a picture. It's in the next five years or so and the number one thing is to purchase the land. It'a small cost and it gets your footprint there so you're ready to plan for the future.
And if the load comes sooner, you can accelerate the plan. If the load takes longer, you can delay the plan a little bit but getting the property is very important right now. Any questions?
So I appreciate the presentation and obviously we need to be as prepared as we can. But again, this is an estimation on what load may be in the future. Something I'm curious about because you were praising the city for having a low percentage use of its transformers in maybe comparison to PG&E. Assuming that PG&E is facing the same mandates in Vandenberg Village, Mission Hills, Mesa Oaks, some of those areas. I was curious if they already have more load what are they doing to prepare for their future? Because that might add a little context to our timing and how soon we need to prepare.
Yeah, so utilities are increasing. They're upgrading their power lines, getting ready for the load. The city of Palo Alto has done a study on their grid and they've gone out and they've put a plan in place. And I don't have the number in front of me how many millions of dollars that I don't recall if it's tens of millions of dollars what the number is, but they're going to be upgrading their grid. They're going to be upgrading our substations. Palo Alto is out ahead of a lot of the municipal utilities.
They're investing in their grid heavily right now. I don't see the City of Lompoc as a Palo Alto. They have a very high per capita income, and they have to be accelerating their plan. Lompoc has some more time. Lompc is fortunately in a very good position with your transformers With your power lines, you've got time. All we're saying is from the forecast is you need to start putting things in place to be prepared but you've got time. That's the good news and if it was a year or two from now I'd be concerned. I'm not concerned. We have recommendations that as long as you're implementing these things very gradually over time you should be in very good shape.
Appreciate that thank you.
Yeah and I suspect, I don't know what PG&E's transformers are loaded at but I suspect they're loading them up quite a bit more because I know other utilities, large utilities their transformers, their grids much more loaded than yours. And I'm talking about another utility with six million meters and another utility that's across eight states. I think they're 11 million meters. They load their transformers in their conductors way above what you are right now So you're in a good position right now, but you can't rest on your laurels is what we're saying. We have to plan for the future.
Next slide please. So I want to call your attention to some of your equipment inside your substation You have many assets inside your substation that are deteriorated and they need to be replaced. You can see that these are VTCTs, the lids are rusted. If water creeps into the VTCTs you can have acetylene buildup. You can have some things, chemical buildup I should say, that can cause a fault which you could see failure and it would take out part of your substation This is coming from our manager, Doug Rustano. Flew in here and took pictures of different parts of your substation so we've identified the pieces of equipment that need to be maintained, replaced and we're just on the cusp of putting together the cost of each of these items when to replace it in priority order and how much the cost would be.
So we don't do the work. All we do is tell you what We see in industry where the best practices and what do you need to do to maintain your equipment? And Your staff's very willing it's just there's certain aspects that we're going to recommend And then they'll either do it themselves some of they can do themselves or you'll go hire somebody to help with the work Next slide, please.
These are other pieces of equipment that are damaged through the years inside the substation. The one on the left is small. It's just a replacement of a rusted box. The second one to the left has already been corrected. They just resealed. There's moisture creeping into a switch. They resealed and that's done. The two on the right looks like either lightning or high voltage surge damaged figure eight I believe it is, yeah?
I'm going to talk a little bit about what's going on in your substation. You've got your central most important location of assets is your receiving station, also known as a substation. You need to make sure it's not a $40,000 car. It's a four or five million dollar investment facilities and it does need to be maintained and your staff is very willing like I said so just calling these to your attention next slide please We assessed major equipment for capacity. I've shared that you're in good condition now, and condition of substation assessments. We've looked through the substation for the major pieces of equipment.
We did not go through and take off any termination elbows, points, connectors, go into cabinets. We didn't open up and dig into cabinets, take outages This was a cursory review at a high level, relatively inexpensive just to go in and give you an idea of what you need to do with your major pieces of equipment. We evaluated life cycles for replacement of aged assets.
Your major assets, number one, number two and number three are your transformers. They are in near excellent shape. That's a great thing. Those are probably $1 million to $1.5 million each. Thank you very much. And there's some other pieces of equipment around the transformers that we're going to work with staff and show them what to do, and we've been talking with substation Scott Brady and others.
I'm on bullet number four. The key thing about the equipment is each piece of equipment has a rating that when it's brand new, that's the rating. And we're assuming everything operates like brand new. We have not derated cable conductors due to corrosion, salt air corrosion, the ampacity of your cable, your wire, it drops. We have not derated it based on Thank you very much.
The bottom bullet, we did also look at fuse overloads. Those are the fuses that protect the lines that go into the neighborhoods and we did identify a few of them that become overloaded in outer years. We did not coordinate, we did not look downstream at how's the coordination for the fuses. We did not perform a coordination study. We just looked at loading and the impact of those overloads to be able to replace the fuses. Those are small cost items.
Next slide please. Okay, so this is the recommendations. I'm summarizing here. So track and compare actual annual loading to forecasted loading. I'd say even more important than that right now is to purchase the land for the substation number one and then watch the loading each year. And as CARB mandates start in impacts from the CARB mandate start to occur and load creeps up You will be able to gauge when you need to pull the trigger on certain items. For maintenance also, you'll need to be doing some of that and we'll prepare line item costs for that.
Number two, perform the gas, dissolve gas analysis on the substation transformers and load tap changers annually. That was just done last month. And that's why I know your transformers are in good shape. Your load tap changers need maintenance. I'll talk with staff about that. That's a very low cost item compared to your transformers. Number three, perform a fuse coordination study to evaluate the coordination and this is between upstream devices, distribution transformers, downstream fuses and such.
We just want to make sure that everything coordinates so if a fuse downstream blows If there's a fault downstream, the fuse closest to the fault blows instead of impacting a larger number of customers upstream. Number four is this year replace the CTs, VTs and we're working with your staff and I understand that NCPA is going to handle that and you have some funds with them so they will handle that through We're doing a cursory review of your SCADA system. That's your supervisory control and automation of your distribution grid, and there are options that we'll be laying out whether to upgrade or go Upgrade is your least expensive option. Again, we'll lay out the options and talk with staff and make recommendations there.
Number five, 2027 replace the 2000 amp 115 kV circuit breakers with main cabinets. We've got some costs there. This will be in a table. And also number six, replace the 12 KVPTs in 2027 and number seven in 2028 replaced the 1200 amp circuit switchers. We've got some costs there. 2028, prepare a prioritized small conductor replacement program to get ready for the loads that are coming. You don't have to execute it right away but we want to prepare it and where we see the worst loading We give it to you soon and then you watch the loads. You have the model now, and your team here at the City of Lompoc can take over the reins of watching the model. We can back off and provide less support than we've been providing.
We can help you as much as you want or as little as you need us to. Number nine, 2028 prepare a plan to replace cable elbows to increase ratings along major feeder routes. Those are the major circuits on the major streets and bring them up to 600 amp standard which is the standard among the feeder. That's what your feeders are rated for at the substation should be all the way out.
I think that is about it. Yeah, that's it. If you can go back one slide, yeah. So that is the presentation of giving you some information to be able to think about and I'll take questions right now.
0:46 – 0:5629 turns
First let me thank you for this report. A lot of this probably should have been done before you raised the electric rates, which is a study because I know they raised the rates anticipating $70 million worth of projects but they didn't identify the project so better late than never. I appreciate that.
Yes, I do want to say one thing. $70 million is not all at once and I'm not aware of $70 million. I think that's probably taking Palo Alto what they have and what they're looking at. And I forgot their number. It's tens of millions it might be over a hundred million dollars but they said that and then I think the city prorated off of that so but that's not all at once. That may be spread among 15 or 20 years and there are certain things need to happen sooner than later
It's nice to have this study before they raise the rates, but also the point of fact is that in what they did move forward with it didn't have a significant increase Thank you. What they do right now on average
Probably very gradually You know what we're seeing is you know two three years from now Small increases for the people that you know the new subdivisions if they have an electric vehicle They plug in yeah, they're gonna see their bill increase because they have an electric vehicle. They convert They don't have to go to the gas station anymore so that kind of swaps over and
Gas water heater
versus
electric water
heaters big difference. Yeah, that is gonna make a difference It's a short duration. That's not running all day is a short duration but it will make a difference
I Believe a 40 gallon electric water heater family of four is about 305 25 kilowatt hours a month is just saying which is about kind of what our average is right now per household so there are significant increases but Which at that time we could see some of these rules and regulations when people start feeling the pain. And they realize they're getting a $600 a month electric bill, which other areas with air conditioners feel those pains already in the summertime. We here don't, most of the homes don't have AC units, which is again one of the reasons why we have the ability. We anticipated for more than we didn't need but it's a good thing.
But there's one in your future list, Home Depot's co-gen plant. I don't know what they used in power before but are they going to be restricted on their gas co-gen that they have there? I mean it could be as significant on that side of town. They use a lot of power with lighting and such.
Yes, so I think some of the load that we call distributed energy resources, DER. Some of the DER in the city of Lompoc is allowed to push their generation back on the grid. Small solar on houses but new solar is not allowed to push their load back on the grid. They can serve their own house but not go push it back. So you're still going to see an increase of load It's going to be a lot of work. Because the new you'll have that portion of
It depends on if they are going to provide their own generation. I think Home Depot
has their own generator,
They got a big roof, I guess they could cover it with solar.
Some solar there are other technologies to be able to convert too.
Another question prior to this how was this study done? Prior to using Qualys what did we do? How did we study what we needed repair replace capital projects? Have you obviously used an outside consultant does anybody know?
I'll tell you what I've heard on some of it. So some of it, they would take amp readings on the lines that hang amp meters on the lines and look at the loads on the lines as they saw loads increasing, they would replace an upgrade in advance of it getting too high. They know what the load is at the substation. I say they, we, the city because we're working with you The city knows what your feeders are running at.
So knowing what the loads are on each of the circuits is as you're seeing increases in loads, they would plan for upgrades and the conversion. So this system was being served by four KV, 4,160 volts. It got converted to 25,000 volts. I'm sorry 12,000 volts with 12,000 volts you have a lot more capacity on the power lines so that postpones the need to upgrade the conductors.
What I was
getting
at is so we did the consulting ourself internally or did we go to
an Internally, but also I think there was a model that was prepared. But I think I understand it was maybe somewhere between five years or more ago there was a model. But I don't know that they did a forecast into the future. It was a model for current year to look at the loading present state is what I understand. Okay. Staff would have to give you more information. I have a limit.
I didn't see me volunteering now and but yeah thank you. Councilmember Ball?
I just have a few questions, and again, just in layman's terms for me because this is all over my head in most contexts. So talk to me a little bit about the second substation idea, right? And maybe you can pull up that slide where there's the projection of where load should be or will be if you can go back right there. And I think I'm buying into the idea of redundancy and making sure that we have a backup. I think I understand that pretty fully, but say that everyone waits until their appliance completely blows up more people than we thought buy used cars drive used cars and there's you know the load is a little bit lower than the projection If there's two substations, is it six transformers that we have?
So you start off with one or two transformers and you build as the load creeps up. And so you have partial backup for the existing substation as well as your handling future load growth. But you start small and you build, it's very gradual. You don't run in with three brand new transformers but you do have enough to sustain. And then but you also have the land to be able to position a second and a third transformer and then you can add them as you see the load start to increase. And if you have an emergency situation, if you have to pick up the substation, the existing substation which by the way Transformers are very old, but they're in great shape. The equipment is very old.
You're talking about 1980s vintage for substation transformers and equipment? They're serving the community and they're doing a great job at it. It's just the smaller items around mid-size pieces of equipment I was saying that need to be replaced. So getting to your question is by the land Get it prepared and then watch the loads go up, and then pull the trigger when the time is appropriate. This is what our forecast shows right now.
So the land 2028 plus or minus a year you can never go wrong in having your land available.
So is it fair to say if we get the land locked in, we do have flexibility? If the load comes way under projections... You can wait. ...you can push
out a little bit further. You can sit and wait which is a great thing. And you'd rather be over-prepared than under-prepared. Absolutely. Thank you for that.
And then only other question I had just for reference there was, I was curious is there any, um, you mentioned I think it was 22 getting up to 44 Where was it 10 years ago? I'm curious if there was measurements of... Because obviously, electric cars have been around for 5-10 years. There's been more adoption etc., but that would
just help me to see. Yeah, I'm sure that can be shared with you. We can follow up on that.
I just would find that interesting, just to see where we've been and where we're at and where
we're headed. The one thing that has probably changed in the last 10 years is the California, the car mandates. They weren't around, I don't believe they were around ten years ago or more. So this is relatively new and they set hard fast deadlines so when people go to buy a new car, the dealers are not going to be able to sell a brand-new car that is anything but ZEV.
Thank you. Appreciate it. You're welcome. Yeah, so the other thing to take into consideration is carb. Is this 100% guaranteed carbs going to continue on their path? You know if enough California residents say hey I can't afford my electric bill going up And there's a grassroots push on the CARB. Could that change things? Possibly, but we're not saying build the substation, we're saying buy the land. The land is less than one-tenth of the overall cost, but it puts you in a position to be ready that if it all comes to fruition like they want it to, the CARB, you're there.
0:57 – 1:038 turns
I was curious on the substation major components. What's the lead time now on those?
It depends. So some of them, some of the components you can purchase in 16-18 weeks. Other components, well the transformers I think are depending on where you're getting them from could be anywhere from 40 to 60 weeks so but your transformers are good it's a smaller to midsize equipment that is probably 16 to 30 weeks A blended average, but we'll have that also on the table. I'll ask Chris Partington who's our manager who went through this. Doug Rustano and Chris Partington. We had a substation manager who did an inspection and we have a substation manager engineering manager who designs it that looked at this.
And like I said, we'll pull in the experts from whichever part of our company to be able to look like a big utility for the city of Lompoc. But they only come in for part-time, a few days a week and give you an overview.
Any other questions? Council Member Bull. One quick question I meant to ask, and I don't want to go too long on this but... Playing devil's advocate, you had mentioned that our load percentage on our transformers is pretty low and healthy and that's great. And PG&E is almost maybe sometimes double what we are. Why don't we just think about well why don't we just push our transformers harder and change the timeline?
You can. What's the downside of that?
The downside is if you push them up to 60%, they're 1980, I believe 1981. And I forgot what the other one was but you're sitting at 40 years plus and if you run them at 60% are they going to be able to handle the workload? Are you going to run an older car Thank you. You can continue to run them as long as you're testing the oil, you're making sure that dissolved gas analysis is done and the chemicals look good. And you can continue to run them.
Some transformers are running 50, 60, 70 years in big cities in the East Coast. So what's the downside of running them higher and let it run? What's your backup plan? That's all I ask you whether something happens. Thank you very much. You're welcome, thank you for your attention.
Oral communications, three minutes. Seeing nobody rise, we'll close all communications. Come back to the council appointments. Item number six, Council Appointments to Airport Commission. Somebody got something? Councillor Starbuck, what you got? Airport Commission. It's an at-large position. Make your motion.
Go ahead and make a motion that we accept Carlo Della Fuente on the airport commission.
For a second? And seconded by Ball, go ahead and vote. 5-0 Council request item number seven is discussion of city organizational charts. City council meeting feature agenda items list training for council members to access the electronic systems and files. Who's got a run on this one? I guess
that's mine. So you know me, I love charts but these are these next couple items or I guess my point is we receive a lot of data. Data is certainly not information, we have to work hard to get it from data to information and there's a couple areas that I'd like to get support for changing the data into information so if we could have the next chart That's good, that chart is fine.
I think it would be really valuable to get an org chart out of our staff. Throw the next chart up two place That's what a department chart would look like. I think it'd be great to have the names on them, some additional information such as is vacant? Is it being hired or is it on reserve for the police? It'd be great to know if the people are actually available to work.
I put that together in about half hour. It doesn't have the right data in it because I'm not privy to that. But each department manager could fairly easily do that. And so I personally think we should get that twice a year, 15th of March by the 15th of August. The March one would work if we're doing budget kinds of things and the August one would give you time for when the midyear budget reviews are done.
I think it should have the title of the position, the name of the employee or label it as vacant and then some kind of annotation after it. So are we hiring? Or is that reserved? So yeah, we funded a position but we're not filling it. Is it a contractor or is it part-time? Is it unrestricted duty so therefore not available? That's what I, and I couldn't just bring a motion up without bringing it up for discussion. So this is the way I'm bringing it up for discussion but I would make that motion right there.
1:04 – 1:1121 turns
Council Member Boehl? Two questions for our city attorney. Has this gone through your office to review before we're talking about this?
The orb chart issue? Any of it. Well, I've been asked questions by staff and by Council Member Bridge with respect to the Public Records Act training portion of this item but not the organizational chart that we're talking about at this instant.
Thank you.
Have you had a chance to review since it went out? Is there something that's A doable
component?
That
would not be my responsibility to put together an organizational chart for the city. Would it
be violating contracts or something if the org chart as written? Do you have a comment about that?
No I don't.
Well, we've been working on this for a while. We're not getting very reliable data out of the MUNIS system. I provided an org chart that the system currently puts out. We were trying to do one very similar to this but it's all manual and right now I don't have a lot of staff in the corner office. I lost my administrative assistant which is somebody who I would normally assign this to so we're trying to figure out a way to produce this This would be a lot of data.
If you add our positions, part-time, you're probably looking at 500 or 600 people and they change every single day. So I mean if we could get a reliable data source and a way to convert it into an org chart And we can do it in real time. I know that, I wrote a program for the vacancy report but it took me six to eight months to come up with a reliable data source and spit it out on a format that you guys could read it and utilize it.
So, to me I'm having a little bit of problems with this, like I said our software developing it. The only other option we could probably do is hire somebody but we'd have to do some research on what the programming would look like and how much it would cost and where we get those funds But we can produce one very similar to what is in this, that one here. We've been working on that. We're almost done but yeah there are some limitations on what we can get out of our system and what we can produce.
Is there a way you can link it with not asking the dollar to be there but with the payroll aspect because you basically have all the names out there on the payroll that we have here under I don't know how deep yours looks at, but I'm sure you know what's that. That comes in front of us and presented with us all this. Is there a way to take the data out of
that? I haven't done programming in awhile, but I'm kind of leaning on staff to figure that out. But that's what we did with the vacancy report is I took all the data out and then took all the ones that are vacant and added them up so you could see where they're off by position numbers control numbers because each person who's hired has a position control number.
So someone is going to have to do master sheet or template in order to make that, where you can pull that data in and have it come out as some sort of document you can read. The MUNA system isn't providing us with anything even close to this. So we're at square one trying to figure it out. Right now, like I said, we're doing it manually but it's very time consuming and like I said, I'm very limited in my staffing right now.
Councilor Ridge?
We have 300 employees essentially and what we're hearing is we don't know Who they are, where they are, who they report to. It just boggles my mind. I have been in 10,000 people organizations that were able to draw an org chart. Each department would not take more than two hours to put their org chart together. I think it's getting overblown as to what we're asking here, and I'll give you credit. We seem to have been working on this for a year. It was promised from the HR department.
You and I have sat around the table and said there was going to be somebody prepare it but if it's impossible and I'm the only guy who sees value then I'll just move on.
I don't think it's impossible, but I'm going to need some more time to figure out a way to get it done. And I think we have 387, but if you're adding part-time, you're adding probably another 100, 150 because we go through part times pretty quickly, especially during the summer months when we have park and recs and red shirts and they're changing all the
time. Well, if it's the part time that's throwing it off then maybe we just take that piece out.
OK, we can do that. I can try and get back to you. I think we're pretty close to getting one together and we can go from there.
Councillor Boehme? Yeah, I was just curious for context. City Manager, how much staff have we lost at a director position here at the city over the last year?
In the last year, we've lost quite a few. Fire Marshal, Public Information Officer, Utility Director, Community Development Director, City Engineer, Public Works Director. Billing official, our planning manager, our principal manager. We just lost our contract manager, management service director and like I said, I'm short one in my office that's the administrative analyst position that's vacant. Well, I never did fill the assistant city manager but I'm trying to recruit a few.
Thank you for that. I think one thing, and I think in certain contexts this can be valuable but I'd hate to see our limited staff chasing this when... because I get that the motivation might be trying to figure out added efficiencies and job performance etc., but maybe one of the questions we should be asking too is why are we losing so many people that could be helping implement some of these types of things? I think that's a question that we should all be considering
to
1:11 – 1:2227 turns
Do it manually and then use the data from our system to generate a report that can be done instantaneously. But right now we're working at manually, and we probably should have it within a month. Have what? We probably should have it done within a month.
All right. I'm willing to give him more time.
You do need to take public comment before the motion. OK.
Very good. Any other questions? All right, open up for public comment on item number 7, org chart. I see nobody rise for public comment. We'll close public comment and bring it back to the Council for motion, deliberations
I was just curious, maybe Council Member Bridge you were asking for it to include the name of the employee. Maybe you can elaborate on why?
It's just typically an org chart you know what their job is and who's doing it so if your Looking at Bob's department and you wonder who is working the financial management system, you'd know their name. One of the first things I asked when I came on board is could I have a list of names of people that work in the city? Didn't exist. The closest I could get was Connie would give me a phone list. Yes it's buried in Outlook which is where I was sent but you kind of have to know the answer before you can type it in so.
Councilor Boehme.
The layers of leadership is to not get into the weeds too much. I think if we have complaints about efficiencies or job performance and so forth, our responsibility is to connect with the city manager and staff at that level to look for ways to increase that efficiency. What I don't want to see happen is a blame game or a scapegoat process where City Council took it upon themselves to micromanage Councilmember Starbuck.
Mr. Albro, this was done a council majority a few years ago had asked for this and we it was a completed project I'm not sure where it went but rather than reinvent the wheel we could just get that to roll again. I don't know who did it but it was presented to us.
It was done on my office but you know the structures have changed a lot through the years when we moved I moved a lot of departments around and streamlined to get rid of some layers of management that I didn't think were needed. So the org chart's outdated, and we're using that same format in the same software to try and update this one. But we've just been bombarded with a lot of other things, and we're just trying to get caught up.
Do I need to make a motion to have him come back in a month or six weeks, as he says he's got coming? Or can we just do it at a head nod, or what do you
need?
Yeah.
I can try and come back within a month and
give you an update of where we are with that org chart. Is that... I'm looking at the city attorney. Are you good with that with a head nod, or do you need me to motion that?
That's up to how official you would like to make it. So it's up to council.
All right. Well, I'll make it official then as a motion to come back Four to six weeks and give us the update of where we are.
Hold
on. Seconded by Starbucks, so let's go ahead vote. That passes 4-1 with Councilmember Boehl voting no. So, next item.
Okay there's a slide for that too. There's a slide for that as well I'm sorry so the next item I'll keep trying to work is action items and the closest thing we have is the upcoming agenda And everyone up here to a man has commented how the upcoming agenda changes, your items seem to be lost. So I don't know the answer here, but my motion is that the staff comes back with a way to put some configuration control on action items. Now if that approves the agenda so there's some configuration control on that, the upcoming agenda, but you know, I think your translation service, is it on any list anywhere?
There's a carbon gas letter that went out. It's not on the list anywhere, we don't know. I think it took a year for you to get your carbon credit thing to actually come up the list. We all have experienced that and I spend time and come in here and kind of nag at it, well what happened to this? What happened to that? But I just think it's good practice if we had some methodology, that if we had open actions that we've created as a council or staff has created however depth they want to go. That we have that list and like I say the closest thing we have to today is the upcoming agenda which is Well, you can see all the red on that one. That's really the upcoming agenda with the reds have somehow changed from previous times.
So I've started keeping that every month because I can't keep track of it. So...I'm asking staff to review the agenda item, possibly an action item list, whatever works for everybody works for staff I'd like to come back in June so we have a way to track the things that we've asked to be done and when they're promised. And so a few notes maybe, so you can tell why it changed?
So that's what I'm trying to achieve here. I don't know if that's a motion or we need a public comment on it. So take it from there
Chief. Generally when I do and I see something move around, I ask the city manager what happened. I know you guys meet routinely on the list already correct? After every meeting we
meet yeah, and we figure out who can do what and like I said We've had a lot of turnover so I mean I just Been tracking the outstanding council requests. I think when this council here took over My guesstimation was around 11 were outstanding I think during the budget cycle, we got up to 50. I think we're down to 20 now. I think we're moving in the right direction. I'm actually pretty proud of the staff and what we're achieving.
And we can put more description of where things are or what we've done if that will help but go from there.
There's no criticism here. This is systems management, systems engineering. The one real example I can pull on is we sent a letter off to some government agency requesting that we could use some greenhouse gas funding. That's the last I've heard of it, and it's not on any list that I can tell. I'm sure it's on Jeff's list to get done. And I'm just picking on that one because we all remember.
Yeah, well that particular one was not a council request. That was a request that you Council Member Bridge talked to me and Dean about and then Dean authorized me to write that letter to the, I believe it was CARB agency. And so that letter was drafted and it went out. We're waiting for a response right now. So that particular one was not one that would have been on the future agenda items list But there are some other ones listed here that were.
Well, like I say, I'm not criticizing here. I'm just feeling like items get... The bureaucracy of it all, we're all so damn busy if we don't have a list that we're tracking they just kind of disappear. So that's my goal. If I'm the only one who is concerned about it, then like I said, just keep quiet.
Councillor Boehme. I certainly appreciate the desire for added efficiency but again, I have the opportunity to ask any of these questions and to demand that the person we hired to run the city, answer any of these questions. I mean, I can follow up with the city attorney and ask him where we are on a timeline for any of this stuff. And if they don't give me an answer, I'll just call them the next day. I can do that. So I think a lot of this again maybe there's good intentions but I just see more staff work and no one is taking on or talking about we have less staff at a management or director level to perform some of these tasks And so again, are we just chasing our tail or are we entrusting the city manager to run our city appropriately? So for me I still have no problem going to the city attorney or the city manager and asking questions about where we are on any given project at any time.
And I have his phone number he also answers on the weekends. Public comment.
Open up for public comment.
1:22 – 1:3519 turns
I think it would be prudent to have some type of list, because if you call and you call and you call and you got three or four people asking the same question taking them out at the same amount of time. So if there is any way to place items in a concise organized manner that everybody has access to, and also for further transparency, are there items that are done in the public and the public has access to it? It would eliminate duplicity of time.
Anybody else? Public comment. Seeing nobody rise, we'll close public comment and bring it back to the Council. Personally myself again like Council Member Ball I've had a couple of items I've seen slip off. I went to the City Manager. It's been a minimal amount of items and those things were rectified quite fast. If city manager, what do you think?
I think there was some confusion during the budget process where you guys are asking a lot of questions but not taking formal votes for action and things kind of got lost. And we were all thinking it's all part of the budget but there was so much that we're talking about things just got lost. So now that we've got the list down And there's things you want on the list. And by all means, do a council request again or tell me if I can go back and research and see where it was actually at. Ask, and I can put it back on.
Yeah. I'm willing to go with that direction. If we see something that's not able to get rectified, let me know. Let us know. Let him know. Okay, so next items.
I'm gonna pull the next one. I need to review it with Jeff Moore. There was some concerns that I learned about what I was requesting. So I'll bring this one back when needed. Is
that the last one? Mm-hmm. All right, do we need to get a group to pull it or are we okay to pull it that way?
That's fine to pull it that way.
You're good?
Yeah, if Council Member Bridge wants to bring it back then he can request that we put it back on the
agenda. Very good. Wrap up number seven. All right.
Number
eight, clarifications of additional direction regarding Lompoc streetscape multimodal plan. Craig Dierling, Public Works Director.
December 16th meeting, the City Council members expressed some desire to get a closer look at what these improvements in this plan really were and discuss them and provide feedback. So that's the purpose of tonight's meeting. And what we have in the presentation is more like a sample and primarily focused on what the staff felt were the higher priority or nearer term needs of the plan And then just open discussion, we can link into the plan and talk about whatever you want to talk about.
So to just give a brief overview, the Lompoc Streetscape Multimodal Improvement Plan or LSMIP is a planning study that produced concept level designs of proposed infrastructure modifications and some other recommendations for the purpose of improving safety for cyclists and pedestrians along North H Street and Ocean Avenue, beautifying those corridors and including the Lompoc community to shape the vision in applying a complete streets approach.
The first two elements of the LSMIP that are discussed a little more in the staff report, that the City Public Works staff recommends prioritizing for outside funding such as like funding from Caltrans pursuing the project that they've initiated. Thank you, Mr. Mayor and members of the public. So this first slide just shows a few examples of some of those things.
The top image is a cross section of H Street taken between the veterinarian office and the Chevrolet dealer, just north of the traffic signal there showing what Class 1 pass might look like with five or so feet of buffer space between the curb and the beginning of the path Generally retaining existing planted zones and generally retaining all of the vehicle through traffic lanes, so the lanes that continue or are left turn lanes. Bottom left image is...
Good question for you.
Sure.
So big blue truck northbound through. How does that make a right turn? Through Your class one bike path, say you wanted
to
pull into Sunset.
Into a property? I'll show you an example of that on the next slide. What yeah so these guys the example would be relevant to the sunset entrance also but they're intersection examples as well as driveway examples Bottom left photo, some cyclists on the west side of H Street just north of Central Avenue on the sidewalk where it's not quite as wide as a Class 1 path would be. Not striped for bi-directional travel.
The bottom middle photo is a high visibility crosswalk on L Street that city already has just to show what those look like and then the bottom right is an existing Class 1 path along the river bank in the looks like around Pine Avenue Let's see. So as I mentioned... Sorry, my clicker is not working. Thank you. Here's an example, class one path in San Luis Obispo on Madonna Road.
So I guess you can see in the top photo and the bottom left, an example driveway entrance crossing the path. Some cities like San Luis Obispo use a colored kind of crosswalk hatching to draw attention This is an example of a sidewalk crossing zone. Some cities also use a sign like you see in the foreground of that bottom, well both top and bottom left photos to call attention to yielding as the vehicles turn in as you would yield crossing a sidewalk.
And the bottom right photo just gives a little direction to path users about So one other note about those class 1 paths we were just talking about that's mentioned in the staff report is The separated bike paths provide a higher level of safety by reducing the points of conflict, like removing the cyclists from the motor vehicle travel lanes. And in reducing those they're located at fewer and predictable locations where motor vehicle speeds are decreased.
So reducing conflict points and then reducing severity This third slide shows another point discussed in the staff report about the absence of a route between the Albertson Signal and really North Avenue along North H Street. The most prominent part of that gap is between the Albertson Signal and Central Avenue where there is not a parallel route on a public street that's accessible from that point within about two miles without crossing private property, So that kind of leads to the staff recommendation mentioned in the staff report of prioritization for outside funding such as this Caltrans project, given that the highest vehicle traffic volumes within the city are at this location along H Street north of Central Avenue.
There is a lack of existing infrastructure there for cyclists and there's a high potential Similarly, as you can see on this slide as well as on the next slide, Central Avenue has high traffic volume, higher speed and there's about a quarter mile or four blocks between the H and central intersection and the next alternative route heading south. If you could just go back one slide for now thanks.
So here's what it looks like facing south west or east from that location So a class one path along the west side that continued south would provide a facility more usable for a greater number of cyclists, rather than just the existing class twos on Central Avenue and then crossing a quarter mile down to a different road. And then now Emily if you don't mind advancing.
So here's a few cross sections This is an example of what the LSMIP might show in a little more detail than the LSMIP does itself. What the vehicle lanes as well as paths might look like at certain locations, so the upper image between Panda Express and Starbucks showing within the existing right-of-way how a Class 1 could look on Next one is the same image you saw on slide 1 at the veterinarian and Chevy dealer location. And then if you don't mind advancing one more slide, this one is south of East West Channel north of North Avenue, more like where Big Lots used to be and where Toyota's proposing to develop on the east side.
And then this next slide is a high visibility crosswalk that exists on Ocean Avenue at M Street. Just to show you what another one of those looks like. So each of these, the plans discussed in the staff report including the LSMIP strengthens the city's position for I'm here today to talk about And these last few slides just kind of lead in to help fill out what we have existing and then what the LSMIP proposes. So that previous one that was just showing our existing bike routes in the city, this one is the LSMIP bikeway recommendations and this next one is LSMIP pedestrian recommendations which mostly are high visibility crosswalks with a few other enhancements.
And then lastly, we have a link to the LSMIP that we can go through any pages you'd like to look at in detail and provide direction.
1:35 – 1:4123 turns
Questions? Councilor Boehme. What happens if the council decides not to support this
Well, the LSMIP was adopted by the Council and the Planning Commission a couple of years ago. So I think the council could vote to change or give direction other than keeping it adopted but if the council does not take any action it would just remain as Planning study that can inform future grant applications or other efforts by the city
If the council decides to take action in totality against it, what are we jeopardizing in terms of outside funding?
I Think we'd have to talk to Caltrans about it near term. Anyway have to talk to Caltrans about what how that would affect the project that they have initiated and We're going to be focusing primarily on those first few slides of improvements that we were showing, see whether they would continue that project or not continue that project.
Is it fair to say in a worst-case scenario we could be losing out on millions of dollars in grant funding?
They had estimated something like a $12 million cost of that project that they were hoping Thank you. So the $12 million request from Caltrans staff for the 26th shop was not approved, and neither were apparently any new projects in the shop as I understand existing projects took that capacity because overall shop funding was lower than anticipated. Let us know about that and discussed trying again in the 28 shop and looking to other opportunities in the future.
They say they will likely, but there's no guarantee that they would put it in the 28. The shop program, there are so many things that are out there like trying to do some shop money towards the Robinson Bridge. When you see the long list of items that are in shop Emergency related, I think that's one of the reasons why you're seeing these fall down. I'm sure you get some of the same presentation SBGAG gets when they talk about how they're funding items and reduced VMTs and all the other long lists of items that they've changed in Don't know if you got the same message from Margie, Executive Director of SBCAG. But the ATP which was one of the biggest opportunities we had for funding because we are the small fish in the big pool she's told me that the big six seven eight million dollar grants don't look forward to getting those now because we're the very small fish and a great big giant pool so I don't know if you got that same message that she gave me But that was probably the largest outside of shop.
Shop's a hit and miss, but the ATP granting is de minimis so to say and we're with the whole county fighting for a couple million bucks.
Well, there's several categories of the ATP funding. So now that we're in the large agency category I think it's 40% that we just get handed to us by formula and 50% that we compete statewide for our last ATP award a couple years ago we were ranked seventh in the state out of 400 some applications so competing with all the other big fish We did get about a $3 million grant.
So I think it just largely depends on the competitiveness of the project, how strong our project is. If we meet their scoring rubrics and our project is competitive, I think ATP is still a viable funding source.
So what percentage of the $46 million that's referenced in the circulation plan is this project?
I'm not sure where you're pulling the $46 million.
It's down deep in the circulation plan, and there it references the multimodal bike plan and everything. There's a $46 million sticker in 2020 numbers. It states...
That's not a number in the LSMIP. It's in what? That's not a number that's included in the LSMIP.
So what is that $46 million reference? I think you're talking about
a different plan that's called the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan.
So what is the estimate of this project then?
Well, the staff report says the LSMIP doesn't have a cost estimate associated with
all the improvements in it. So you don't know what the $46 million number is that's referenced in here?
What I'm saying is it's not referenced in there. I think I understand where you got the number from a different plan, but it's not in this
plan. It's in the circulation element?
It's in Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, I believe,
which
is a different
planning document. But it's in the circulation element that was rented to the Planning Commission.
1:41 – 1:4616 turns
Yeah, I don't think it'd be in the circulation element either.
I guess my concern that I really have is, again, incorporating a lot of this as well puts it into potentially for impact fees as well which increases the price of housing. But when you go put a mandate forward that you're going to do something and now as you're telling me We almost had $12 million, but Caltrans saying we don't have it and we might do it down the road. These unfunded mandates that we're putting together, it's just very concerning because usually when you're establishing a grant, you kind of know what the sticker price is
My recommendation is that the circulation element not include mandates like that to impose these conditions without limitation upon developments. I think the draft language that the planning commissioner reviewed The city shall
assess traffic mitigation fees and developer impact fees sufficient to cover the cost of roadway, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements. Projects necessitated by new development, these fees will regularly examine and if necessary revise and ensure that fees will continue to be sufficient to fund needed projects. So that was in
That's a statement from the circulation element?
Correct.
So did that, was that related to the LSMIP?
July 9th meeting inside there so I just get curious when we're trying to approve a project, we don't know what it's gonna cost, we don't know how we're gonna pay for it but we're saying if it does come through this is one of the ways we're gonna collect money for it and I think we can get in some Very deep water way over our head for this. Council Member Bridge?
I just have a couple of quick questions. A portion of this was the high impact crosses, intersections. Are those all done already? High
visibility crosswalks. Caltrans did a lot of those on Ocean Avenue in the last few years so yeah, a number of those are complete. Some are not complete yet
Okay, is the one out by the middle school complete?
Like around M and N Street probably. I think they did everything up to O Street if I
remember right. And is this an all-or-nothing issue so for just to kind of put it in context if I thought North H Street heading out to the bridge was cool, but I didn't think much of the H Street Ocean Avenue. Is this divisible or the plan is the plan and we either go for it or we don't? How does that work?
I view it as more of a concept level plan that needs a lot more design and fleshing out to really implement like we talked about in December for example downtown there was some concern about I'm going to show my name here.
I have the image of the last time that maybe the Caltrans funding was there and they were off getting ready to do something. Would then there be another design that would come back to us before Caltrans went forward or would Next week when we're out there, we'll let you know. Does that question make
sense? Yeah they typically have a pretty long environmental phase and design phase that almost always involves public like multiple phases of public engagement and document review so I would expect I would expect there to be multiple opportunities through that process, even if they are the lead on the project. If the city was ever
1:47 – 1:5223 turns
Council Member Bull.
Yeah, so again and I've this came up a couple meetings ago and we definitely heard from the community about you know making slight adjustments and saying hey there's certain areas where we should be flexible and you're letting us know like there's still a lot of flexibility if we adopted the plan you know they still have to come up with the environmental review and then they've got to go through the design process and they have to have a lot of public input I guess that means public meetings to get feedback from business owners in the public in general is that correct?
That is their usual process. Yeah, they always do an environmental phase and it almost always includes a lot of public outreach including on site.
So it's not all or nothing necessarily. It's our ability to say hey we would like to engage in this conversation. We definitely appreciate outside funds because we don't have funds of our own to do a lot of this type of work. I guess my second kind of question, I kind of want to push you back towards the safety side of things. I think the report mentioned that the 8th Street corridor, that's where the majority...I think there was a 70% number of car accidents that either involve severe injury or fatalities involving pedestrians happens on 8th Street. Is that correct?
Yes. And it's strongly correlated to traffic volumes and speeds, so there is a lot of vehicle activity at high speed and there is a lot of bike activity. So the more we mix those, the higher the frequency of collision and vehicle and pedal bike collisions are the greatest in severity because people aren't protected when they're walking or biking.
So is it fair to say that Caltrans, one of their main goals here in spending any sort of money to improve infrastructure is to actually improve the safety for pedestrians? People that are driving that don't want to run over people, et cetera. Is that fair? I believe so, yes. So that's probably a good idea. We do have a lot of pedestrians in our community. We have a lot of people who walk to school. We have people that actually get on their scooters or bicycles and ride to the bus stop and then go to Goleta to work. So we do have quite a few pedestrians here.
And I think this is a great plan that addresses added safety. Does it get rid of all accidents? No. But it brings a lot more safety mechanisms and visibility issues I'm going to ask the Council also, on your staff report page 3, we go to item 3
class 4 protected bike
lanes. The plan on page 64 and 66. Can we just delete that whole section of this? This is the one that brings it down to a single lane each way on West Ocean. It shows right at H in ocean, then the next one shows it over on Ocean and K, reduction to a single lane.
She's going to try to pull it up on the screen.
That's it? I mean, does that make any sense?
Yeah, so from my perspective traffic-wise...
It goes from Ocean H. This is the second...
Right yeah so this is basically the cross section proposed on Ocean Avenue from H Street West to the... To K. I think West City Limit. Yeah this is a zoom in at K Street but it would be similar to this.
But
see
what it's done is it's reduced to single lane both ways coming into town and going out of town all the way
Right
yeah
all along West Ocean Avenue.
We know that we don't want to have a single lane in town on the major thoroughfare, especially with the base expansion probably I mean it's just poor planning.
So if the council did not agree with this element and was still open to something like it is proposed on each street you could Councilmember Peruzza.
So I don't necessarily disagree with that. I do think if there is the opportunity and it just, you know we're local and we talk to a lot of people and they say that makes no sense. We've been out there at rush hour. There's quite a bit of traffic and maybe in an ideal system we would slow it down and there would be lots of good feelings about that but we could also have people just getting angry that they can't get home and that could be an issue but you're telling us there is flexibility to say look, if you're not gonna focus on that area you don't have to throw the whole thing out Maybe we can put some of those resources and be involved in the design process and the feedback stage to maybe put some of those resources towards maybe even going bigger on 8th Street where there is a lot of issues as well.
Is that fair?
True, yes. And you could also do something different in this section of West Ocean Avenue that doesn't impact the vehicle lanes if that's your preference.
1:52 – 2:0017 turns
So getting back to a question I had earlier, it says page 13 of the circulation element of the complete streets and active transportation. It references the $46.6 million and it talks about the adopting in July 19th, 2022, the Lompoc Streetscape Multimodal Improvement Plan. So again that $46 .6 million, what percentage of those streetscape multimodal plan or is that not even part of that $ 46.6 million?
No, I
don't have the language of that part of the circulation element in front of me right now but I assume it would be referring to the pedestrian and bicycle master plan because that's the only one of these plans that had a cost associated with it.
So is the Lompoc Streetscape Multimodal Plan part of the Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan? You had a map earlier and you showed most of it's already done and built. Yeah,
the LS-MIP was done several years after the Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan so it has some newer components that were not included in the Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan So no, it is not. There might be certain elements of it that are in the Ped and Bike Master Plan but as a whole it is not part of the Ped and Bike Master Plan.
As a whole it's not part?
Right, yeah. So the Ped & Bike Master Plan I believe was adopted in 2020. The December 16th staff report on this item discussed all three plans a little more thoroughly and this time I tried to bear it down and focus more on what the council asked for on December 16th rather than reiterate all the stuff we told you last time so as I remember the Ped and Bike Master Plan Councilmember Vega.
Craig, you know I just want to implore the council to take some of these discussions real serious Because a lot of times what we do is we discuss things and there's money that's being spent in the background And we don't know that. We actually bought into the project even though You know your presentation is really good as far as letting us know that we have a lot of leeway here Should we take that direction?
But I think what's happening here is It's confusing to me to see the discussion here. And I think as we have this discussion, we also have to give good direction to you so that we know which way we're going instead of having a discussion and six, eight months later, we allowed money to be spent that actually is buying into the project to a point where we can't pull back or make any different direction.
I mean, does that make sense at all? Because I'm not sure how long these discussions go with you where you're saying that we still have the ability to make changes. But as far as Caltrans is concerned, if we don't give any strong direction kind of towards you or towards staff to what we want, does that leave the window open to a point to where it's going to allow someone just to come in and do what they want?
Well, I would say that Caltrans to some extent can do what they want on their state routes whether the plan exists or not.
Right.
Also the city does not presently have anything budgeted for any of these projects in the LSMIP so staff isn't spending budgeted funds on it other than the staff time to coordinate when necessary with Caltrans talk to them and find out what they're doing and whether they got shop funding or not things like that So yes, I understand your concern about not wanting to let it run too far ahead.
But also just to let you know that we're not actively working on developing the project. We're just trying to keep our opportunities open with Caltrans and keep our eyes open if there are grant opportunities that present themselves to implement parts of the plan that are acceptable to the council.
Thank you. You know, as far as the choices that we have here to the different kind of proposals and Caltrans isn't involved apparently yet. Is that correct? We're just having discussions on what we would like?
Well they've prepared some planning documents and kind of like a grant application to the shop program for this but they haven't entered into detailed Environmental review or design yet on these projects?
So just to clarify here, if Caltrans can come in and do what they want because we've already kind of previous council said it's okay. We're in Where does it come to a point where you know the decision-making is it in our corner at all Or are we just having a discussion and pretending that we have the power to make a change here
Well, I think Caltrans would appreciate feeling like the city including its elected body is supportive of what Caltrans, any expenditures Caltrans wants to make. So I think they would be listening for the council's input and direction on projects that they want to move forward with.
And I appreciate the way you're framing this up. I mean, I'm just reading page 5 of 6 here and it also says if Council desires it may revise the LSMIP to exclude the proposed Class 1 bikeways, bicycle and pedestrian paths on H Street between Ocean Avenue and Chestnut Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you. Is this actually something that we can vote on and send direction to them, or are these just what we would like to see? And in the end, like you said, is Caltrans going to be able to do what they want anyway?
Yeah. So the purpose of that paragraph was just to say if the Council wanted to modify this LSMIP, then you could do that in any way you wish. I gotcha. These were a couple examples of things.
So, I think you answered my question. You said it's a city plan actually. It's not something that Caltrans says, hey, you guys can pick and choose and whatever because we don't know that we're there yet. And I'm just trying to do that so that the council can take it a little more serious as far as our decision making because how far this discussion goes, we may have bought something Unless we, by majority, take a vote on some of these things. So thank you.
Council Member Bridge?
2:00 – 2:0711 turns
Well I just want to second everything you just said and I think what I'm hearing is we're kind of floundering here a little as to how we're giving you the direction. Because I think there's some fairly consensus being developed, for example taking everything down to one lane on Ocean. We haven't voted and I don't want to presume to but if we need to vote my guess is that would come out please take that out of the plan I think I heard a suggestion from Councilman Vega that the Class 1 sidewalk on H to Chestnut, I have a feeling that's received a lot of pushback.
So I think what he's asking and maybe the answer is you've got to make a motion
Until you get too excited we have public
comments. I'm not trying to make a motion, I'm just saying to answer that question and I think we're ready if we have strong feelings about pieces of this we should have it taken out now. And then Caltrans will have a very clear message.
I think that's what is mentioned to us, that we have the ability to... Council Member Ball?
Yeah and I think there is some sort of consensus here and again it's with your guidance you've been working with Caltrans so you'll have to keep educating us on how much input we can have and when it's appropriate I think it's important to make some of those changes that we all believe in but not jeopardize the opportunity to receive funding. Elevating some costs that we didn't predict, we didn't understand and all of a sudden there's a big deal.
But maybe you can reassure us a little bit. I do think we have an example. You talked about the first grant was almost $3 million dollars. We were number 7 out of 400 people. That money was spent to enhance walkability safety in our community right now Go past Lompoc Middle School, you can see a lot of that work done there. Has there been unpredicted cost associated with upkeep or maintenance that are cost overruns? Or has that been a successful project using outside grant funds in our city?
Yeah, I think that one's going well. We have not yet started construction on that particular grant but the non-infrastructure part has been ongoing and has been benefiting
the community. So with the part that hasn't been developed yet do you see a lot of cost overruns and things that we never thought about or do you think that plan can be implemented and built out using those outside funds?
Correct, yeah we're not anticipating problems implementing the project with the grant funding received.
So I think you and you'll always do your due diligence to let us know if something pops up that we weren't or you weren't expecting but again I appreciate the hard work that you've done to coordinate with Caltrans and to make sure that our city is receiving as much outside funding as possible In many different contexts, this Council has been on record suggesting that we don't use our city taxpayer funds to do a lot of work. We should first and foremost look outside for grant opportunities, and this is a great one. I hope we take advantage of it. Thank you.
Any other questions? We're open to public comment. Thank you, Craig. Don't go too far. All right, we'll open this up to public comments. Item number eight.
Good evening honorable mayor, members of the City Council staff and members of the public. My name is Ashley Costa and I serve as the Executive Director of the Lompoc Valley Community Healthcare Organization and its multi-sector stakeholder group The Healthy Lompoc Coalition. I'm here this evening in strong support of the streetscape and multimodal improvement plan For over a decade, my organization has championed physical activity and active transportation in our community.
Our efforts began with the Safe Routes to School Project pilot program in 2011 and continue today through our Active Transportation Program grant in partnership with the City of Lompoc and Lompoc Unified School District. Together, as you've heard, we helped secure nearly $3 million to improve safety and walkability in high-density neighborhoods near Lompoc High School, Lompoc Valley Middle School, Hapgood Elementary and Clarence Ruth Elementary.
We also proudly supported the development of this plan in 2021 and 2022. Our team assisted in gathering community feedback, you can probably see Healthy Lompoc referenced in the plan more than once. And my former Director of Community Health and I reviewed and edited the document in its entirety before it was approved by the previous City Council. This plan was shaped by extensive community input. So I just want you to remember the elements that you might be considering for repeal or revision may actually reflect specific recommendations from residents who shared what they believe would make their neighborhood safer, healthier and easier to navigate. This you might know is an award winning plan and it's community informed. I would hate to see it weakened or dismantled And really the bottom line is that cities that enhance walkability and bike ability tend to enjoy richer, more diverse local economies, higher property values and net economic gains both for residents and for their public finances.
So I encourage you as council to please focus on implementation and continue advancing practical data-driven safety improvements along H Street and Ocean Avenue. For those of us who have been around long enough, we remember the A Street Road Diet that was so controversial. We can't go from like what was it? Like four lanes down to two lanes. And it's been really great for safety, for speed, for the students right there at that elementary school So just know, even one lane on Ocean and K isn't as bad as you think it's going to be. And it might drive actual increases in safety and economic activity in those corridors.
So I just encourage you to think about those who gave their opinions in the development of the plan. And I thank you for your time and your commitment to health and safety of our community.
2:07 – 2:132 turns
Karen Hauenstein, resident. Commercial driver. You're talking about State Route 1 and Highway 246. These are highways that are traversed by semi-trucks. You cannot eliminate either one of the Lanes in either direction on those highways. You would cause immeasurable traffic issues as you configure yourself if you sit at the corners and observe the traffic during high traffic times.
Just remind everybody what happened to Goleta with that absolutely horrendous treatment they did on their main drag that they're now having to expense to rip out because people can't figure it out. We can't ask the semi trucks, the buses all of the fast moving commuter traffic that goes through H and Ocean to slow down and use our family-owned businesses. They're not going to do it.
There's no place for semi trucks to park, buses, the people who are traveling to other points of our county, the people who are commuting to work every day. What we should be doing instead of this weird way to get state money isn't even there We should be really seriously pushing for our bridge access bringing 246 to Central, to eliminate a lot of the concerns with pedestrians on each notion.
And I think the suggestion you already had to do things draw the bike and pedestrian traffic away from those two routes is extremely worthy. Thank you.
Nick Gonzalez, resident of Lompoc. I have several parcels along Ocean Avenue. Just before this was presented at a previous council meeting we had an opportunity to see what the throttling down of traffic would result in. They were doing road construction, they put barriers and from 8th Street to 7th Street the cars were backed up. I couldn't get out of my driveway on Ocean Avenue near A Street because as soon as the light, it was just a constant line of cars.
It was a disastrous mess very similar to what has happened in Goleta when they throttled down the traffic to one lane each way. It's a disaster and yeah you might be able to walk because the cars ain't moving but people ain't moving to where they need to go as well There's some concerns because it's also the main traffic route for all the fuel that goes back and forth for Vandenberg Air Force Base.
Are we going to have these big field trucks now delayed and stopped in the middle of this whole corridor when it gets throttled down one lane? Or are you going to have to do an alternative traffic route through the actual residential areas of town? I initially supported this in concept. As I had several properties, I thought it would make it more pedestrian friendly and soften traffic but once I personally witnessed what happened in Goleta and more specifically recently what happened when they Throttle down the traffic to one lane on Ocean Avenue, it completely changed my support for that type of traffic mitigation measures because it just wasn't functioning well at all.
The other item was the multimillion dollar price tag in both the planning commission and it was discussed that the funding mechanism was grants And impacts to property owners. So my first question was I started adding up the parcels along H and Ocean, I'm like wow if we got 12 million say another 3 million 15 million and this was estimated at around 45 or 46 that leaves another 30 million are we gonna all get hit?
It's hard enough to bring a building back to life and to get a tenant, and do tenant improvements, and to do these things. But I know people personally that have acquired property where they suddenly find out that they're required to do the curbs and sidewalks in the infrastructure, and the project is no longer economically feasible. So we have great roads, but if the properties get assessed these high impact fees and high costs because you haven't defined where the funding for these projects will come. And the only funding mechanism that you've included so far that I've confined is through impact fees and charges to the adjacent property owners.
You're going to really stymie any kind of economic growth along those corridors. We have great roads and no businesses. Thank you.
2:13 – 2:182 turns
Anybody else? Seeing nobody else rise, we'll close public comment. I was trying to wrap around what this was all about and what the problems were. Going to UC Davis when they had more bicycles than they had people in the college town, bikes are everywhere And the complexity in this is that we keep calling it a streets. These aren't streets, these are highways and that's the complication of it when we try to reduce traffic and slow traffic and as I asked about Sunset Chevrolet you'd be having traffic crossing over making a right turn over basically what's another street? It's a bicycle on the pedestrian street If you think it's hard enough already, making sure that you're not running over somebody walking down the sidewalk as you're trying to get in and spend money.
You can overly complicate it by, when you look at the view that we have there, people are gonna exasperate. You're gonna run people over. And you mentioned about numbers is what's triggering a lot of the accidents. Well now you're gonna increase the number of people, you're gonna redirect them Increasing accidents. We have so many corridors. Growing up here, when we rode our bicycles, we stayed off the highway. We had plenty of side streets to run on and there still are plenty of side streets to run on but the complexity of it is you're intermingling highways and highways are designed for the vehicle component To get from A to B, and you're gonna massively complicate it. I can agree that there is an issue down there on Central Avenue with a bike lane aspect but what was the total cost of the add-on on the bridge in the bike lane to Hancock that I sat up there for six hours the other day and nobody rode on it?
I mean, it's in the millions of dollars that was spent on that Beautiful lights on it. I just really question the directions we're going with something that, an unfunded mandate that we have no idea what it's gonna cost. Apparently it's not part of the $46 million. I don't know where all that calculation came from but it is on page 13 of the circulation element plan stating as such.
So my curiosity is we started creating these unfunded mandates and there are some people continually, you asked about Caltrans. I talked to a couple of people in Caltrans that are still being at certain level employed by this the plan at a certain level through the grant funding with Caltrans up at the San Lucia Canyon conversation up there. They'd been shown it's a great thing. We're still part of it and getting funding and getting paid So they're very curious on that.
Council Member Bull? Yeah, I just respectfully disagree. We have really smart people here that work for the city that are supporting this project. We have engineers and thoughtful people that are trying to increase safety based on evidence and based upon engineering. And to assume that we know better that someone turning into Chevrolet is going to start running people over Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. This is an opportunity to receive outside grant funds for the benefit of our entire community. It doesn't have to be our way or the highway, pun intended. We can do adjustments and be flexible about what does or doesn't work on Ocean. I certainly hear public comment about that. That makes sense. I had to wait in traffic in a single lane. I totally get those things. I'm flexible in all of that, but for us to flip our nose or to thumb our nose at Caltrans and say you know what when you find the funding if you have the funding you've offered to spend it here but we're not interested please spend it somewhere else. I guarantee you another city like Bealton or Santa Maria will improve safety for pedestrians and their community and we will sit here and have highways that have no change and if we're only prioritizing vehicles that is not taking a thoughtful approach to the future of our city from my perspective
2:18 – 2:239 turns
So actually, Caltrans said they weren't going to be funding it and maybe you could in 2028. Caltrans actually pulled away from it so just to clarify. Council Member Bridge?
I feel like there's a discussion going on of Throwing the whole thing out. And then there's another discussion going on about well, there's pieces. Seems like if there's pieces we don't like. We can pick those somebody should make a motion on those and we could address it if somebody wants to throw it out. I don't know if they have the votes here, but they could certainly make that motion but.
It seems like we're kind of beaten to death.
Well, let me get back to you. One of my concerns is number one anything that's in here and apparently we don't even know what it costs so I know I like to look at stickers before I start approving things. We don't have any idea what's going on apparently. A lot of statements made about safety and otherwise. I don't know how many times you have seen the people on 8th Street just dart out in front of you with no rhyme or reason, and the safety component accidents are having... You had a guy pushing his shopping cart in the middle of 8th Street the other day and got hit by a car in December.
I don't see how Any part of this, if you can show me a part of it that shows a sticker so we even know and a funding mechanism truly behind it. I gave you one that they're recommending in here that says impact fees. You heard the grant funds Caltrans pulled back on shop? We don't even know the price tag. You don't even know what we're approving. A bunch of pretty pictures.
When I see him make a right turn, and I'm going to have to go over a bike lane and a pedestrian lane that are co-mingled. And if you think it's going to be safer to have bicycles and pedestrians going together, that in itself is not going to be... That's a nightmare. So I don't see there aren't a lot of suggestions about safety but I don't see it so You tell me something that we would be approving, if anything it has a price tag with it. Otherwise we're approving color pictures.
Council Member Ball? So maybe you can respond to some of that I'm gonna put you on the spot for a little bit but let's go back to the three million dollar grant So the $3 million grant, you're telling us that there's not a projection for us to have to use excessive impact fees or additional city funds to implement that project. Is that correct?
Correct, yes.
So if that's the case, that a $3 million grant can add walkability, visibility and safety additions for people walking to school, not people darting out in traffic with a shopping cart but people walking to school, that's not going to cost us any extra funds So that makes me think that if there is the opportunity, when they find the funding for us to say yes we'll absolutely take your funding.
Spend only as much as you have because we don't have more money to spend on additional improvements. Am I getting that correct? That Caltrans would be willing to spend an X amount of dollars that doesn't require us to have excessive impact fees raise taxes on folks to implement certain parts of that plan?
Yeah that's, that is the intention at a staff level and I think especially at the Central Avenue location we have opportunity to bring some other fees are not dependent upon future impact fees. So if there is a contribution necessary from the city, I think we have funding mechanisms in place to provide the limited contribution the city might need to make at that
location. And again, I'm putting you on the spot. If there's $12 million that comes our way, is Caltrans expecting us to come up with the balance that equals some random number of $46 million that's not associated with this plan?
That's not what they proposed in their shop funding application. They didn't ask for any city funding when they applied for that. Thank you.
2:23 – 2:2812 turns
But it was shot down, correct?
It was not approved, right. Yeah, they told us that no new projects were approved this year because of funding limitations. Okay.
Council Member Starbuck. With something like this, Craig, it sounds as though we could probably go ahead and phase it. Is this a true statement?
Yeah, so it being a planning document there's no timeline that has to be achieved and really there is no mandate that the elements ever need to be constructed. It's more like this is what we'd like to achieve someday in the future if we get funding and things
line up. I don't want to kill the plan but I think if we were going to do it I think maybe a phase one would be something very simple and I think everybody on this dais would agree with let's do Prisma Road to Central That would be the first part of this that we'd like to see done. It doesn't change flow, all it's doing is adding some bike and pedestrian safety there and that would be it. If that was ever approved, we've got grant money however it goes then at that point could determine what our next phase of this project would be. That way you would stop the bickering.
We would be able to go ahead and just say okay here you go see if we can get a grant or whatever on that. That's listed on page 75. Yeah,
that's kind of similar to the staff recommendation. I think at a staff level we were thinking the highest need was just between the Albertson Signal and Central but yeah whether we want to expand one way or the other let us know.
Council Member Bull. And I'll just say that you will find consensus with me, I don't want to over bicker this for sure and if it needs to be phased so be it. I think we're relying on you to make sure that we keep an established relationship with the opportunity to receive outside grant funds So for me, I would always like to be educated as when we get too close to jeopardizing that where they say you know It's not this is not what we had in mind. This is not part of our plan We're either going to do it ourselves and not ask you or we're just gonna take the fund somewhere else so again if If that's something that is feasible for us to accomplish Let's let's do a little piece of it And if Caltrans is willing to pay for it even better so we don't have to pay for it ourselves That would be my hope
Do you want to make a motion?
I just had a couple of comments. Go ahead. You know, I think we should be open-minded enough and intelligent enough for all our body to keep asking questions here. I don't think we're at a point to say hey, we don't want to move forward or anything but there's some good questions that need to be asked or answered and we may not get those answers but I just don't want to put my head in the sand and say that Caltrans can't do this and can't do that And then we didn't have the conversations that gave us the choices that could make our community a little bit better. At least have those choices in place so that we can pick at least, at the very least, have a choice to which direction we'd like to go in case of In the instance that Caltrans just says we're going to go do it, okay?
I mean you don't know. You know Craig was pretty clear. It's their highway they can do what they want with our input and they're hoping that we get our blessing input but I'm just saying for us to have this continued conversation I'm not sure exactly what direction you guys like to go in. We need some fiscal answers. We need to know what the impacts are to the properties around these things but there's also other alternatives here too Where the impacts would be lessened to all these questions, you know. So just think that we should have a little bit more of conversation instead of putting our head in the sand and say no but it's just me.
So I guess I'd put it back to you, if there was consensus up here where we said hey this in a reasonable sense makes sense to do some work from Albertsons all the way to North Avenue. Is that a chunk that we could take on as a phase one and say let's see when they come up with the money let's get that done and then work forward from there? Or what is staff looking for or what do you feel keeps us at the table with Caltrans with this bigger conversation about safety?
Yeah, that is the segment that Caltrans was first considering after coordination with staff with Albertsons to North Avenue.
So that means that we don't have to agree to a single lien on Ocean and we don�t necessarily have to do something in Old Town but that could be their focus first and they would when they have the funds I guess commit to that? Is that fair? So I would support that. Again, I think that's a phased approach. It's not dramatic. Maybe we can argue about pulling into Chevy but in general, a little bit more focus on safety again not for people pushing carts although they should be safe too but for people who are just going to the store or headed to school or crossing the street to go get groceries, I think we should be focused on that.
2:29 – 2:3724 turns
So real fast before I make this motion is when a project is a phased project, it's a project and impact fees are assessed as the project. All right? So even if you thought you were phasing this they're going to put whatever calculation they have in the circulation element. I read in there that section that said there that says that they're going to do that. If you have something that you want to do I don't think it needs to be part of a plan, but if you want to bring something back that's more specifically, you're talking north of Central, correct?
So our first recommendation is Albertsons to Central and then second from Central to North Avenue.
My recommendation is you bring those back as individual plans Because those can be impact fee related. You have here something that we have no idea what it's going to cost, but I know it's going to cost somebody a bunch of money and I know it's hidden in here. I think the plan as written if you want to bring section back individually, you can't phase this because approving it is your approving it.
So bring me something back that you're talking about or the future council whatever it is of the sections that you're talking about. But this plan here, I could go on and call it bickering. But I can go on and talk about the catastrophe that's in this plan. You heard just the easiest one. I had over 31,000 views when I posted that. And a couple people said well anything is better for bicycle. The majority of everybody else was like are you kidding me? Who's thinking this up?
So my motion is I just have a question here real quick.
We're not collecting impact fees for streets, state highways. I'm misunderstanding that. The impact fees are for city streets or construction of, for development. Impact fees would not be collected for a modal improvement plan, for bike paths etc., am I correct in that statement?
No, they can be collected just as we do for traffic signals and otherwise.
So that's correct. But we're paying for a traffic signal somewhere other than a Caltrans
right away? No, the biggest one was H and Central impact fee which is the highway so no that's not true. We'd be collecting that as an impact fee as the circulation element says.
I think at the moment we're not collecting any street impact fees, but there are mitigation measures sometimes associated with the development projects that require payment.
All right. In a second that'll die of lack of a second. Somebody else got something else? Council Member Ball.
So again, I don't know if you want to come back or not. Again, I want a little clarity. Is there good work that improves safety from your perspective and from Caltrans perspective that doesn't rely on us assuming to collect impact fees?
Yes.
So I think whatever council would be willing to say, look let's take a phase. To me, I feel like the safety through all the way from North Central and around Albertsons, that's a necessary area. And if they're willing to invest in that and not say hey you pony up as well, to me that seems like a no-brainer for me. So I guess my motion would be Go with your recommendation, which is that's what you said staff was recommending is to take on that first chunk. Call it phase one or whatever you want to label it. Let's support that. Again, that is not us agreeing to single lanes on Ocean and a lot of the other things. Is that correct? That's just that first little component.
Right yeah this and I guess to reiterate this plan isn't actually yet in an approved circulation element either so that's still needing to come back to the Planning Commission to decide whether or not to mention the plan in the circulation element and all the related effects of that. So at the moment, the plan is only a planning document that in the draft element was discussed as the mayor was mentioning.
So yeah, your support of that northern component of what's in the LSIP I think would communicate to Caltrans the city's support of their project and help direct them to continue At a staff level, we're not asking for city funds at this time or other direction for city staff to work on it. We're just kind of trying to stay in the game with Caltrans.
So if that makes sense, that would be my motion is to follow through, stay at the table with Caltrans and implement that first phase. That's my motion.
I have a question. Council Member Ball, the difference between the Mayor's motion and your motion would be they sound very similar except to bring back the two pieces that I'm asking. Two pieces of the plan without the rest of the book and everything is that similar to what they were asking for or what?
Sure. I don't know if it, I hope I understand where you're coming from. I guess my motion would be to follow through with that first implementation of the plan and still bring it back to Council for anything past that. So again, if it comes to Ocean or doing something at Chestnut, I'm not agreeing to that. I'm just saying that first little piece that staff is recommending that when Caltrans has the money they'll pay for, that's what I'm supporting.
So if you
don't kill the plan, it's still the plan? It's all in there. You can call it phasing or whatever you want, Ocean Avenue one lane is still in the plan.
We have a capital improvement plan. We have a lot of plans that are unfunded. Again, it's okay to have a plan without a plan to pay for it yet. It's just the plan but I'd love to see us stay at the table and take Caltrans money so we can get pieces of this accomplished.
So that's not true because a plan is what you use and a capital improvement plan is what you use to charge impact fees? Or to go over fees...
Just saying, we have a lot of unfunded plans. What's that? We have lots of plans that are unfunding.
No, actually a lot of them are through developer fees in one way or another. There's a way to get the money. But if you don't throw this thing out, this nightmare will resurrect and has resurrected and you'll have one lane on Ancient Ocean. And that's why I say if they have a project they want to do... I'm not
agreeing
with that. ...get rid of the phasing aspect. Don't phase it. Just bring back a single project. If you're going to phase this, you still have the whole project here. The whole project is still here.
Then bring it back. But I'm saying, I'm open to that idea. What I'm not okay with is saying, look it's going to cost us $30 million which you can't come up with the correct math. We've asked staff two or three times like are you asking for additional city funds to implement part of improving safety? That's what I'm supporting. I'm not saying that I support one lane on Ocean. I am not saying I support some of these other things. What I'm saying is if you want to call it the first project, I'm supporting that. I am supporting whatever Caltrans in its first effort I don't fully agree with that statement, Jim. But I do agree with it in the sense that we're dealing
2:37 – 2:4620 turns
And I've watched them before. They will take whatever is written, and it'll come back and haunt us. So I agree we have lots of plans that are unfunded. Most of those plans are internal. They have to come back to us. If we let this plan go through as a phased project, I think we will be communicating to Caltrans That's our goal. And if they decide, oh cool we like that piece of the goal, they may go forward without our input because we don't control that agency. That's the only comment I would make about it.
Let me give you one that was a plan that is still resurrected and still out there. The Central Avenue extension at one time was a viable element. Guess what resurrected again? A $124 million project that was going to be paid for by They were going to collect the impact fees. We had no other funding coming
out, so... I'm well aware of that because I'm bringing that up when we get to council concurrence because that's in the nexus report and that's coming. Yeah, I'm just saying it. But that's internal before we spend the money that's ours, we do have control but Caltrans if we communicate to them that somewhere in this plan is taking Ocean down to one lane Thank you.
on anything of the projects they're wanting to do. So you're going to approve something that has no dollar value? I've never, we
usually have an
estimate.
Well, I don't have any problem saying this is a vision for Lompoc. The general plan we're all going to get is a vision for Lompoc. So I don t have any problem with saying something like hey it would really be cool to have a safe road from La Parisma to Central Avenue or Hey, Central Avenue and H Street is a problem. And I'd have a vision of it being beautiful.
What I do have a problem with is putting things in there that at a personal level I don't think is a good idea and having that codified in some plan that goes out to a public agency then I don't have any say after it happens. It's kind of like what we went through the Robinson Bridge. We all went to the meeting. We all gave our ideas but in the end Caltrans is going to do what Caltrans wants to do Council meeting
Again, I don't know what their flexibility is. I don't want to jeopardize outside grant funds for the benefit of safety for our citizens so I
would support yours if you've got didn't have the phasing as but you said a keep it together the North that was what your one statement was Right staff reporter. Where are we? where you said You said we did the alternate routes, high potentials. Staff recommends a class one bikeway from traffic signal, Albertsons to Central Avenue infrastructure priority with it.
So I would agree with that aspect of it. The problem is if you leave all this other stuff in here and Caltrans goes maybe they'll go with us, maybe they won't, maybe they do it on their own but we'd be in a quagmire if they did something like that
So, and again I'm not necessarily disagreeing with that. I feel like I've said this in a couple different ways. I don't want to jeopardize our funding opportunity so what I'm relying on staff to educate us is hey can we say look this is all we want to do? This is all we're open to. Is that sending the signal to Caltrans that were not serious about a bigger plan that we already supported in the past? So that's where I'm relying on you to say it. No, that's okay. If you guys just want to do this a little bit, Caltrans is still interested in the conversation. I don't want to see them walk so I'm not against what you're saying.
You're going to make that our project we move forward with is in the circulation element as the request on page 4 of 6? Is that what you're saying? How does that
differ from your staff recommendation?
Well, I guess the general staff recommendation was to get clarification and give us feedback. And absent any reductions in this LSMIP from a staff level and our coordination with Caltrans that would be the first elements that we would pursue if the council So if a city is wanting to revise other elements so that they're not, like West Ocean Avenue for example, not going to reduce vehicle lanes.
You could do that and say hey Caltrans by the way we want Those are revisions to the plan. You can tell them something like that? From
your perspective, and again I'm open, is it better for us to come back with those adjustments and let Caltrans know that we have a solid plan that we're open to that includes most of the stuff but absolutely not X, Y & Z? Is that the process or have we not given you enough direction that it's definitely not important to majority of Council to do single lane on Ocean
I think if the majority of the council feels that way, it would be clearer to communicate the plan, or we'll replace this element with something like replace the class four with a class one because that doesn't reduce vehicle lanes. Something like that. So if the council wanted to take an action like that, the plan could still exist minus this and add this instead.
And you could also emphasize priorities, or if the council didn't want to revise the plan but just emphasize priorities, That would leave the possibility open that Mayor Mosby and Council Member Bridge have some concern about. So I think it's up to you how you'd like to do it. Somebody
could resurrect anything down the road, but to get through the circulation element and to get through moving forward, as CalTrans was still on board, you have a project which is as stated here on page 4 of 6 Which is a class one bikeway from traffic signal of Albertson Shopping Center Central Avenue as the highest bicycle infrastructure priority. And I'd say if that's what you're willing to go forward with, I would second that one. Somebody wants to resurrect it being something else back later?
Don't
complicate it. Let's let them do that. So I guess resurrect something later again, I just go back to is Caltrans Is that is there a line that we cross where they say? Ah, they're just not serious Let's yeah, let's go elsewhere with our funds and hear me out That's what I was most important to me my priority if we were gonna say let's not do all of it Let's focus on one thing It'd be everything on the north side of town all the way to North Avenue Because that's where we have the biggest issues with pedestrian safety and not having, you know, an updated way for people to drive around safely and ingress-egress with businesses and so forth. So is that something? I mean, is that something Council would be open to like the north side of town to North Avenue?
I mean, is that reasonable? Is that... That's not crazy to me. You want to expand it from North Avenue north? Is that what you're saying? I mean, I'd love to see a lot more thoughtfulness. But it sounds like Council has limitations and would love to have things come in bite sizes and say no to certain things.
And that way we importance of this is what we're putting in the circulation element. What's in the circulation element is then important when gets implemented and built out to people. So if you willing to go North Avenue forward, I would second you and let the other go away instead somebody else they want to resurrect
I guess there's a couple people up here that have been quieter than me and you, Mr. Mosby so I'd love to hear from council. Are we biting off enough?
You had a motion on there. I was trying to see what your motion was but I will go to Council Member Vega. Go ahead.
2:46 – 2:5117 turns
I see we're both of our, I think we're all on the same page here. I see where the separation is where we only have to take a couple of choices out that we decide we don't want so you would have to decide yourself or Council would have decided we don�t want to go to one lane and we don�t want all that other stuff okay? That's coming in here. I do agree with you as far as to separate ourselves and pick and choose a couple of times so we don't get caught up in the whole thing. The only thing that I didn't want to see is us losing communication with Caltrans during this process. I didn't want to say, hey, we're going to throw this out and they're going to take it I'm trying to see what his motion is. He's got it up there. North Howard, northward?
Putting it all on you, Craig. What do you understand my motion
What do you think is achievable? No, and I mean this. What do you think is achievable that keeps Caltrans interested in this conversation and how much can we chunk off of the north side or do anything to 8th Street to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and just traffic in general but you showed us there's still two lanes going both ways that's not a big change it's just additional safety for pedestrians and some signage and things
Right, yeah. If the Council wanted to support or prioritize the segment that Caltrans has been currently looking at, placing Class 1 bikeway along the west side of H Street from the Albertson Signal to North Avenue as well as pedestrian crossing improvements and any other beautification improvements in that corridor That's what I understood your motion to be. He
says it so quickly and easily and calmly, I wish I had his tact but that would be my motion.
Not prioritize but the other stuff goes away. I'll leave that up to
you
folks
to
define. Well I'm trying to understand what's actually coming back let's just say for a moment Those two guys got to the agreement of the area and they're saying what I think they're saying is that's it Do you go back and revise the plan? Is that your intent? Are you just gonna put up an addendum on top with that's where I'm getting confused To me what I think people are asking at least The mayor, I believe is whatever is decided here That's coming back here. But as a much truncated plan Is that what you're hearing?
Not really. What I'm understanding is a prioritization of
part of the improvements in the plan. That's what I heard you say. I think what I'm hearing the motion to be, and these guys have been talking to each other so I don't know if I have it exactly right but north of north whatever improvements you as a staff feel increases the safety level the most Is what they want in the plan. Everything else goes away if you want to come back later with another plan or an addendum to the plan cool, but that's what I think I'm hearing and the only reason I'm trying to clarify so
and I'm going to ask you and your conversations with them to advise us on say, well hey we can definitely prevent going to one lane ever on ocean. We can definitely do that. And a couple of other things but do we have to give up on all of the future of H Street down towards ocean? Are there other components that we might consider but maybe never have the funds to pay for it's a plan.
Again, that's where I'm trying to find the middle ground where we just don't get a lighter Caltrans takes it seriously enough to say, okay well let's focus on your first priority.
I'm just trying to get clarity on Lompoc.
Me too.
I was willing to support you with North Howard Avenue forward if somebody has something else to bring forward later they can do whatever they want but not keeping all the other stuff together and if it works guess what? Other people will come back and do a section, but here's an opportunity of North Avenue forward that I would...
I would definitely take something over nothing. I think that's important so I guess in some sort of consensus way I would agree with you. And again... You're the one making the motion so I'm just... But this is where I need staff direction because I don't want to make a motion that Caltrans just doesn't take it seriously anymore and they just pull out
Yeah, I can't say definitely how they would view that. There definitely would be a reduction in the connectivity or the effectiveness of traveling through the city by just leaving one remaining segment although I do feel like that is the segment most lacking infrastructure at the moment so I don't think it would affect their current project but maybe their view of the overall I'm not insisting that we do
2:52 – 3:019 turns
I'll make that motion. I don't anticipate Caltrans
Having funding or really definitive future steps until about the 2028 shop time frame, so in a couple more years. We could let you know what Caltrans staff says sooner than that. It just won't be based upon funding allocation. At least it likely won't be based upon funding allocations or definitive action by a funding board or something.
You ready for me to second?
I just want to clarify that this is going to be an amendment to the plan, to remove everything from the plan south of North Avenue. And so because the plan was adopted by resolution, we'll need to have a resolution to amend the plan. So this motion is to bring back that resolution to amend the That can be on the consent calendar, and we can do that.
And when we get a few cyclists to sit up in some of these seats and pedestrians and some of those folks then we'll come back with this plan. I've got a cycle you can ride with me if you do all the work. All
right. Go ahead and vote. All right. Passes 5-0. Anybody want a 10 minute break? 10-minute break.
Come
back. We have number three as well, so item number nine. Approval of Ryan Park Stage Project Conceptual design and authority should notice invited business for the project approved use in community development block grant funds for the project except a $50,000 donation From the Lompoc Rotary Club and approve designation of the stage name as the Lompoc Rotary Centennial Stage.
Hello. Good evening, Mayor, the City Council, members of the audience. Tonight we're here for the Ryan Park Stage project. We're real excited. This project is going to be a total replacement than the old stage and it will be totally ADA accessible. It'll be a lot more functional than the current stage and enhance In the image of the stage and that what the ultimate goal is to bring in more events.
To Ryan Park, so we're real excited about that. So a few of the discussion topics tonight will be the Rotary Club stage designation. We do have a couple representation here that would like to speak at the end of the slide project, and then the other is our project timeline. So the Ryan Park Stage designation of the Lompoc Rotary hit a milestone of celebrating 100 years of service to the City of Lompoc and the Valley, and they wanted to recognize that 100 years.
And the Ryan Park stage was a great opportunity for the Rotary to ask council and partner with the city for the designation of the stage to be the Lompoc Rotary Centennial Stage. That would be a one-time donation of $50,000. Part of this stage would be a permanent, the decorative wind wall that's kind of similar to the Beatty Park wall that has steel cutouts of designs.
And with that, then the city and the Rotary would work on a final design prior to the donation then that both parties can agree on. We do have some conceptuals that I'll show you tonight but those aren't finalized yet. And with the designation of the stage it will be for the life of the stage. Oh, oh I'm sorry go ahead. A project timeline. Pre-construction, as soon as we finalize our design, we are ready to go on to RFP. That process is about five weeks and then we are looking to award at City Council in May or June.
The construction timeline, we are looking to start right after our July 4th event. We don't want to jeopardize the Flower Festival or our event to try to rush it through but at max it would be a 12-week project. And again, it would be CDBG funded for the ADA accessibility. And the project amount would not exceed $525,000 and that would include the contingency.
So we're excited to kind of show here's the concept. We try to keep the concept a little bit like the old stage. The stage would be almost exactly what the size is of the current stage, so we don't want to make it smaller. It's a little smaller on the edges but for us to be able to utilize the handrails and the ADA access on both sides Here's another angle of the stage so you can see the wind wall on both sides, all three sides.
Currently the city doesn't own the wooden partitions. Those are the flower festivals. So these would be permanent fixtures so we wouldn't have to worry about that if other people are wanting then to rent the stage and have events Those are already there for the different event coordinators, so we don't have to coordinate with the wood for the future. And there's more of a little aerial.
There'll be some landscaping, and then here's an aerial here that kind of shows the concrete coming out to the already renovated walkway. This will kind of enhance other opportunities for dancing or if there's any performances it wouldn't be on this stage, it would be in front. It would just kind of enhance that whole area to be able to have a lot more flexibility. And then here's a shot of potential ideas on the panel, we kinda wanted to capture the flowers given recognition to the Rotary Club and also put a little space theme And then kind of our Parks and Rec logo, we're gonna add a CDBG logo in there as well. And there would also be two plaques out there. We have rocks so we'll be able to put two plaques out there recognizing that the Rotary Club as well as within the city and within the funding sources.
So with that, The recommendation is to approve the Orion Park stage of the replacement conceptual design, authorize city staff to issue a notice inviting bids for the project. Approve the use of CDBG funds for the project in the amount not to exceed $525,000 except the $50,000 donation from the Lompoc Rotary Club And approve the designation and naming of the stage as the Lompoc Rotary Centennial Stage.
And with that, I'd like to have the representatives for the rotary come up and then I can answer any questions after that.
3:01 – 3:0610 turns
Good evening City Council. It's a great honor to be here this evening Thank you very much for having us we as The Lompoc Rotary Club have been serving this community for the last 100 years I had the privilege of being president last year for the 24-25 year of the rotary club Not many organizations can say they've been serving this community for a hundred years Here in our area so It was a great honor to be able to do that, and we'd like to commemorate that with the stage project in the prime location of our community at Ryan Park.
And with that, we would like to hopefully collaborate with you as we have in many projects in the past and be able to put that together. Thank you very much.
Any questions for Council? Councillor Vega.
Yeah, I think it's wonderful Thank you. The money for the stage as we previously spoke about, you know we also through a lot of input and asking out in the public about a roof somewhere. Has that been discussed with the Rotary maybe in the future or something? As far as, you know Lompoc has some weather here and you mentioned that you wanted it to be more usable and more economically feasible since it's a major park You know, I remember the council spoke about that and I'm just wondering where all that went. You know once before Mario if any discussions are because we always forget the roof
Yeah, it was basically a funding issue. We try to utilize what we had for the CDBG funding for the first year and so if there is potential funding on a different source down the road then we can always add a canopy over but at this time there wasn't enough money to be able to do that.
I think a commitment here from you guys that we do look at that because I noticed that's very important for Lompoc. If we're going to have the kids come out here and be in the sun and out there, we can utilize it a lot more. And I think it would be a great presentation for Lompoc and the Rotary. You know, I'm pretty proud that they're wanting to be involved in helping donation. Again, thank you so much. Appreciate it. We're just looking later on whether some sort of Some sort of a wind brace or cover out in the front, because we all know what Lompoc is.
And if you could make that commitment to the council that we need to take a serious look at it instead of looking the other way on that one I'd appreciate it.
But definitely.
Councilor Brugge?
I'm sure you've thought of all this but I'll just mention it just to reinforce Normally there has to be sound wiring come to the stage from out in the middle of the field. And with that big concrete apron, are you making sure we have open conduit or some way to get the wires from the middle of the field to the stage? Because otherwise it'll be a problem, right?
I believe that the last Flower Festival, they did it from the side. They didn't do it from the front so I don't believe that's going to be a conflict. You usually
have the sound stage right in the middle of the field in the front. So you might want to check on that. The last four concerts I've been, that's where the sound guy sits but okay and then the other thing that comes in pretty regularly is There is a structure that they put the lights and so tie downs for I think it's just conceptual, but that space in the front is pretty large. I'm assuming we're going to have that divided up so it doesn't just crack or you have to be 12 inches thick or something. So please make sure you think about that.
This is cool. We've all wanted a new stage, so this is really cool. It's those little things It's already through the building permit process.
3:06 – 3:194 turns
So I'll just say that it's not a bad idea to consider the different uses. Again, as we're trying to attract people there if again maybe it's just a little pipe that goes underneath the sidewalk or whatever. We just have to think about it right? But beyond that, I think it's a great project. It's been since we were little kids, it's always been the same so it's very exciting and thank you to The Rotary for stepping up and finally landing something that makes a lot of sense to celebrate this centennial 100 years of service.
I mean, my grandparents weren't even alive when that group started here in town. It's a big deal so thank you for that involvement. And then the only other thing, and I say this a little bit tongue-in-cheek but timing does matter. Again pressure is on. I'd love to see that college park happen because if not this will become the skate park temporarily until that one does.
Yeah we will have then the skate little things on the rails so they won't be able to do
Okay, any other questions for public comment? Okay, let me open this up to public comment. Come on down. I see nobody rise. We'll close public comment and bring it back to the council for a motion. Huh? I'll make a motion that we approve the staff recommendation along with We have a motion and a second. Motion to approve the donation and dedication. Is that everything needed? If not, yes. There is a motion and a second. Vote. 5-0.
Good evening, Mr. Mayor and City Council and the public. Staff wants to present the service enhancements for the City of Lompoc Transit Agency. So just a little timeline on the evolution of where we got to this point. In September of 2025, we launched a redesign of our cold system in which we included more east-to-west modality and introduction of an H Street shuttle.
Mobile online booking for microtransit and paratransit and stuff like, and those things. And it introduced the microtransit in the evenings on weekends. Through the month of September and October we ran that system all the way through November. In October we had a unmet needs meeting in which we met with the public at large and discussed the current state of how the transit was operating And from that meeting, along with a mixture of customer feedback over the months that we have been running this system, we decided to implement some changes into the system on a trial basis consisting of December and January and February until we could bring something to council to make some more permanent changes to try and improve those based on customer ridership feedback.
The service enhancements that we were looking at and changing was, some of the feedback that we got led to all these decisions. One of the points of contention was our current route design of east-to-west was creating a lot of excessive transfers for ridership in which they have to transfer two to three or four times to be able to get from one side of town to the other side of town.
This coincided with the fact that our transit system, not all of our routes were connecting at both of our transit centers. The Transit Center in Mission Plaza and Albertsons and the Transit Center on Cypress and I. We redesigned our routes to still continue with that east-west modality which we discovered in our original studies that would help increase passenger counts but included a way for the routes to be able to go and connect with those transit centers to be able to reduce the amount of transfers and also increase north-south flow The other thing that we had discovered in the feedback from customers was with us stopping our transit system at 5 o'clock at night, a lot of people who were getting off work were not able to use our fixed route system to be able to get home once they got off work.
So they were being forced to use the microtransit system which With require them to book a ride and it was also more expensive. So we decided to extend our fixed route system to six o'clock, to be able to help those evening commuters be able to get back home on the same bus that took them to work in the first place. The other thing we did is we got rid of the H Street shuttle which was having some problematic issues with it being so linear. It was creating a lot of extra transfer points along the line because it was the main connection point between north and south But now that the buses all go to north and south, there's no need to have that H Street shuttle working that route. So what we did is we rolled that H Street shuttle into what we're calling the yellow run or the bridge house run.
Or flex line I'm sorry, flex line. What that route now does is it operates as a dedicated bridge house run that operates at eight o'clock in the morning and then five o'clock at night In the morning, it starts at Bridge House and goes through town and drops off at Cypress and I, DHS, and Mission Plaza. Then in the evening, it picks up at Mission Plaza, picks up at DHS and Cypress and I then returns to the Bridge House to drop people off at night.
During the other times that it's not in use of doing those, that same run is being utilized as an all-day microtransit for people who do want to have a more customized transit experience and operating as a third ADA paratransit bus which helps alleviate the pressure off of our other ADA paratransit buses. So During this trial period, what we set as our goals was a series of different things. We wanted to see ridership increase.
We based our success on a combination of ridership increasing, customer feedback being positive and driver feedback. We have had a lot of success. We have had a lot of positive customer feedback from both drivers and customers, as well as our ridership numbers have gone up. Okay so getting into the numbers. So in the month of December we experienced a ridership growth of 21%. November of 2025 was the lowest The lowest ridership count we've had in since 2020, since COVID numbers. We were down to 4,492 riders in the month of November which is extremely low for us. That's the lowest since 2020.
However from November to December we increased by 21%. To put that in perspective if you look on the graph there you can see how That's 2023, 2024 and 2025. You will notice that 2024 did have a little increase. That was a 2% increase. Historically in 2021 between November and December we had a negative 13% ridership growth. We normally drop riders in December.
In 2022, we had an 8% drop in ridership. And in 2023, we had a 19% drop in ridership from November to December. In November-December of this last year, we had 21% increase returning us back to the levels that we were before. And when I made the staff report and I originally constructed this, I did not yet have January numbers. But now that I do have January numbers, I can tell you that January has continued the same trend.
We saw a 15% increase in ridership from December to January with the new transit enhancements. All right? So ADA compliance on the flex line. With when we launched the redesigned service back in September, we had gone down to just two ADA dedicated ADA paratransit buses. Now paratransit is something that the FTA requires us to do in conjunction when you have a fixed route and you run the paratransit and it has to run and be available for people who qualify for the service.
During the months of September through November, we had 51 trip denials and a trip denial constitutes when you cannot meet a requested ride between within one hour before or one hour after the requested ride. In December, we only had four trip denials. And as I said before, now that I have January numbers we had zero denials in January. So we have dramatically improved on that numbers by adding the flex line in there to be able to pick up the extra that we have with the flex line.
Fair alignment and accessibility. So during this time, we've also been in conjunction with SPCAG. We've been running the free fare program since December. We decided to launch the trial period during the same time to try and find out what barriers of entry we might be experiencing on our transit system if the new routes were gonna be able to meet demand based on customers and not have any kind of inhibited barriers for them to be able to use the system.
What we discovered during this time period was that it did significantly improve our ridership, which you would expect when you're offering them for free. Microtransit has improved. And one of the more unsurprising ones was a blue line success. So, of all the changes we did down inside the city of Lompoc, the blue line which is our county run was the one that we did not change at all because it's maintained the same route as it's been. We didn't increase fares. We didn't do anything with that. It was the same.
Once we made that free, we saw significant ridership growth on that line It went from, sometimes we are running over 80 riders a day on that run now. Now that we no longer have fares associated with it which would tell me that money is a barrier to entry to be able to use We would recommend something along the lines of maybe reducing that fare to match more of the city fares so that it'd be more accessible for our residents here in town and the county residents to be able to access.
Okay, moving on to the physical impact. So as COLT is...the changes made on this would not impact the general fund at all. As COLT is funded primarily through state and federal money we would not be requiring any additional general fund money to be able to operate this. This would promote operational efficiency despite a 16% increase in service hours. Because of the changes, we did have a 16% increase in our service hours which is how we determined our contract with RITP dev. This falls below the 20% cushion that we have on there so it would not constitute us having to go back for a contract renegotiation so we're still within the boundaries on that.
And then funding strategy, like I said at this point in time we don't have a fare box recovery issue so we don't need to worry about that. However, I feel that if we reduce the barrier to entries and lower the price on the transit it'll spark more ridership. More ridership means more fare box which means more fare box recovery. You'll make more money off of 30 passengers on a bus paying $1 than three passengers on the bus paying five.
3:19 – 3:2620 turns
All right.
So it is staff's recommendation that we move forward with the enhancements as outlined in the staff report? Thank you.
Questions? Council Member Bull. A couple things, first of all thank you for the presentation if we're voting on quality of presentations readability things of that I love this one by the way I could read the charts and everything you put up there was great so thank you for that sometimes I'm squinting and I don't feel like Anyway, I appreciate that. And I also agree about the ridership and getting that figure down. One of the added benefits is the less they spend on the bus, the more they might spend in town shopping and putting their money into our local economy so...and I also just want to say thank you for looking and desiring community feedback. It sounds like it's made quite the impact on some of the decisions that you've made. So again, I'm in full support of this.
This is great. Thank you for the presentation.
The flex line, is that a reduced rate or is that the same rate as every place else?
So currently when we go to go and introduce fares back into the system during the day if someone's using the flex line it'll be operating at the current micro rates which would be $2 per ride. That would be the rate that it would be at when that's an all-day microservice For ADA paratransit, it would adopt the ADA paratransit rates. And for when it operates on Bridge House, it'd be operating under the fixed route rates.
I would love to see if that could be subsidized a little bit. I couldn't tell from your map, because I'm getting old and can't see, but we have a new center, the hub it's called on Laurel just a little bit west of Q Street. A little bit west of, oh, I was going to say. Does that line go by there? And if it doesn't, could you look at Thank you. I appreciate having that go by there because that would be a perfect transition from the bridge house in the morning to the hub where they're supposed to be getting post office boxes and having services there for the types of folks that come out It's
on R Street.
It's Laurel and Q. We run by the county services there on R Street, correct?
Yeah. We go to DSS so we go right there anyways. So that's already a planned stop for the
bridge house run. Well
I attended your meeting that you had there making suggestions. You had a number of drivers And I don't see any of them there, so I believe you. I got them a bathroom, yes. You got them to support you?
Yes, I got him a bathroom and I got him a better schedule that attunes more to them being able to get their breaks and meet ridership demands as well.
I'm glad you got him that bathroom. That was pretty rough driving around trying to find one. Good deal. Any other questions before we open up to public comment? Seeing nobody, let me bring some public comment. Thank you, Wayne.
I just want to do a shout out to the Colt bus drivers who I've observed are very stable and on time. Also, on customer service they're totering around other people's bikes and stuff and they really care it shows. And they have a great record so I wanted to do this shout out to the drivers.
Anybody else? I see nobody else rise. We'll close public comment, bring it back to council. Deliberation motion which we got going on.
Motion by Ball what's your motion? My motion would be to approve the permanent implementation of those listed City of Lompoc transit system enhancements. Thank you for that
presentation. Very thorough. All right, and we have to bring back item number three. We have to bring it back for the council. Who's on that one? Graffiti ordinance, modification ordinance, who's running with it? What do you got, you want us to Q&A you?
Yeah.
All right so new graffiti ordinance where we used to actually have the city contribute to remove a graffiti way back when to cure the blight component but there's some statements in here I just wanted some verification. So it says graffiti is detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the public what what is the detrimental component to health Anybody know why that? Mental health.
No, it just says health right here. Just wondering do we know why that's in there? Mr. City Attorney?
I can take this one because the detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare is kind of like legal lingo language that is used when you're trying to define what a public nuisance is. That is... Can we just call it a public nuisance? The legalese that is used when you're making findings for a public nuisance.
3:26 – 3:3215 turns
When I see what's going on here and be a victim of graffiti, there's layers of what I like to call victim blaming. When the victim itself is getting graffitied is the one that they're coming after. And I know you try to catch the guys doing it and I guess every once in awhile that does happen but I've got a couple concerns. As it says in here, 9-1650, number one.
It says you shall be allowed five working days after the date of mailing the notice. Well sometimes you take five days after the thing is mailed to get to ya, right? What if somebody mailed over holiday or whatever and he didn't get it? So that makes it very difficult There's another complication that comes in just like what we hear up
there,
the rain.
If you
gave somebody a certain time limit and it rained all
Yes, so our building the division and code enforcement would be in contact with the property owner to make sure that's done. And hopefully we get the cooperation on that.
I get it but it doesn't say that. It just says you got five days since somebody mails you a notice. And in some cases, people are out of town or goes out of town or whatever it might be. So anyhow you get 30 I know that's a lot. Hopefully we can get people to respond faster but. And we have another thing. Another one number two with the same things You can't have it be long, five days. So we change all those to, we'll try 30 and see what happens.
So getting back to 91630B says no person shall in his possession an adhesive sticker etching tool indelible marker. I don't know if there's anybody up here have a indelible marker? You got them on you. When you're on public property, you'd be in violation of this. I mean, I don't know what we can put in language but somebody has a Sharpie that's potentially or maybe it's in your car which you need violation of this so I don't know how we anybody have a suggestion how we can fix that one?
So they're not violating people or Can you put an action item in there? You can't have an indelible marker in a public park, playground, swimming pool or rec facility in the city. Unless you're a city employee or contractor. Do you have an idea of a city attorney? How we don't accidentally get somebody who just happens to have a sharpie in their pocket or car?
Well there is of course discretion on behalf, on the part of the code enforcement officers or the police department but if you wanted to just remove indelible marker from that rule.
I don't have a problem with indelible marker because some people have so like i said if there's an action item with intent if he had it in there you can't have that with the intent It's not just possession, but it's
action or willingness to do it.
I think there's a complication with 916-20. So it shall be unlawful for any person to place graffiti on or apply graffiti to any public, private, or personal property located within the city without permission of the owner of the property. So if you're writing somebody a ticket and they said hey well I gave that guy permission so how do you ever write somebody a ticket for graffiti on your property? You made a comment I was asking earlier said well could be a mural or something but I think there's something in there that makes it very easy Somebody say, hey I gave the guy permission so you can't write me a ticket for the graffiti on my building. Do you have an answer to that? To make that
one work? If we were going to enforce that then we would need to obtain all evidence possible to show that when the graffiti was put on the building it did not have the permission of the owner It
doesn't give a time frame on that one. That does it on defacement. Defacement says you have to have prior written consent of the owner, but this one here, can we put that in there without prior consent of the owner? I don't know. I'm trying to figure out how to make it easy for you
guys. It's not graffiti if there is consent. Are you saying to add the requirement for written consent?
Well it says so right here, without permission of the owner of the property. You want to say without prior written permission on 9-16-20? Would that make it something you can enforce?
3:32 – 3:3710 turns
If you put the word without written permission that would make it easier to enforce yes.
But again, the reason what I'm looking at is if somebody's getting fined and you want to get him $100 a day fine they're going to say well okay give this guy permission. It doesn't have to be prior at that time so your fines null and void.
If you think that will work, I'll go with you on that.
The question I have is we're going after individuals. What do we do if it's on public property? So, we're gonna fine private property owners but if that was on public property who gets fined for being on public property? We'd still treat the city manager okay. I'm just the curiosity to have of that as we supposed to be treating everybody equally under the law so this is gonna get a fine. Is there something that we do that if the city doesn't remove it
Mr. Mayor, Chief Martin. So typically what we see when there's graffiti like this on private property is when we find it sometimes the owners don't get right onto removing that from their private property. If it was public property It's going to get documented, and we're going to notice whoever is in charge of that facility or that property. And it's going to be removed probably within a few days.
So I think it's in those situations where someone just isn't taking the time to remove it from their fence or from the wall of their house or something on that level.
What I'm trying to drill down on is because some of them at the skate park have been there for quite a while. There was actually an outhouse that was just probably egregiously contaminated with graffiti and stayed quite a while.
I can't speak to that, I haven't been down there. Those
are city items that it was on, some of the most egregious graffitis on public property.
And in that case, I would say Parks & Rec has a responsibility to get over there and paint it.
We're finally finding Mario. I'm just kidding, because this gets back to the next point why I'm making it as an item of concern is again the victim blaming component that comes in here and I don't think the rest of the council when you go to 136.50 and you get $100 for a first violation but that hundred dollars can be every day So if you don't get it over, you're out of town or you're in the hospital. That's $100 that day. It's $100 the next day. And if it's a second offense then it's $200. If it's third offense you're looking at $500 and I get why he wants some teeth in it. I'm just trying to look at the overcomplication that can arise when somebody is in a position Most people I know want to paint their graffiti over right away. I've left graffiti on properties, I have because I've been wanting people to gather the evidence for it or because it rains so when a wall's wet you don't want to paint a wet wall but that's the curiosity that I have here 13650 is this finding point where we're nailing a victim what if they're out of state?
Out of country whatever But you look at this fine component that's here, it's $100 a day fine. But the city has graffiti on it and nothing happens. So I'm just curious if the rest of the council thinks that's all fine? And there's an idea maybe they have to pay too... We just met with the beautification commission. They transfer money to the beautification commission. The objective is they never get fined and then money never transfers.
But I'm just saying in all fairness If we're nailing the private property owner, the guy flipping the bill for the lights on here. What are we doing for the city? And yeah I think that's... Those are my main questions and concerns on this item. I have one last thing and then I'll go to the rest of the Council, and that is B on the last page. And I get why but I think this is very interesting.
It says it's a public nuisance to store, maintain, place or abandon any personal property other than the motor vehicle in or On or in a public right-of-way, private parking lot, park or other public area approved and unapproved. And I get it there's other codes that say you can't put a car on that but in that section here it almost looks like it's okay to abandon your car on somebody's property or public property because there are potentially alternatives to get it towed off when somebody dumps their vehicle on your property.
I do feel uncomfortable with blaming the victim.
3:38 – 3:4324 turns
You know, they had nothing to do with this occurrence. But all of a sudden you've got to get this done in a week. So could you tell me I guess it's section 91650C. How many times that was implemented last year? And what that is is somebody coming into the city and asking for help. Did that ever happen last year?
I don't believe of a case.
Pardon?
I don't believe of a case that came across my desk with somebody who bought money house.
Okay, I always saw this as a bit of a safety valve for somebody that they just got tagged, they had no money, they want to comply. If you'd have told me that hey we've had 500 of these and we spent $10,000 okay well I would like that to stay and not get removed so that I can look at somebody in good conscience who got tagged and say, look. You can go to the city and we'll help you. We're not trying to hurt you. So obviously have the whole council. It's 916.050C.
It says they can come to the city and they'll help them clean it up. It never happens, but that's what I have right there. I
mean it used to happen significantly.
Well, he said it hasn't happened once last year. They
used to have four colors of paint and next thing you know they'd be out there. It might
be
the right color but they had it done. I
just feel sorry for somebody who gets tagged if they're running a business and this is a constant problem and you know they probably got to hire somebody to go paint it. Just...I feel bad about it. The second one I wanted to suggest as a change and It's somewhere at the start where it says, you know, you can't board up your building. I gotta find where that is, I guess.
In case I can't find it, I would just like the word board removed or board up, whatever it says there. Right
here.
So where is it?
17-62810.
1762. Must be
a difference of the last page.
Yeah, it's the word boarded up. I think in some cases in this city that's the only way to protect your property if you want to say it's got to be painted pastel or something but you just told me you just had your windows broken in so I just think that Personally, I don't think we should make that illegal. And then the last item is it's a big section but I'll just talk about it. We have multiple paragraphs in here that retail operations are going to have to put up all these signs so when this passes and I go into Go into Home Depot, they're going to have to have all their scriptowrax signage. Walmart's going to have to have all their marker signage. The paint stores are all going to... It just seems like we're making a rule that nobody will enforce And it adds, it's like on my visor.
Don't eat the battery. It just seems like we're making a rule to make a rule. So my suggestion with that whole thing goes away. It's several paragraphs where they say- Are there
signing? I think that state law actually has some signage.
Well then let the state law guys put it in their law. Why do we have to put state laws? Is
that state law?
Do you have to have markers and etching tools? What section are you referring to?
I'm sorry. I didn't come prepared as well as they should
I Believe it's nine point one six point zero four zero
yeah, that's the whole for zero Required sign so every retail house in this that sells chisels scissors spray paint It's a rule just to have a
3:43 – 3:4818 turns
I have a question about big lots. Would we consider big lots as it says here, 1762810? Buildings which are abandoned and boarded up because they boarded up the windows to keep them from getting broken out. Would be considered that a public nuisance? Anybody got an idea for that?
I don't think any commercial building, like Lobote's. Do we really think they should keep all their glass exposed? It just doesn't make any sense to
me. Well I mean do you have something that you can say it's...
Just take the word boarded up off.
Do you want that? Would that qualify a city attorney?
If you remove the word boarded up, then that means you could have buildings with boards on the windows permanently in the city and we would not be regulated.
Then let's put the word permanently boarded up. Obviously we know Big Loss isn't permanently boarded up because it's not... Would that work?
I mean... The property owner can always say, well the boards are not permanent.
But how do we get big lots from being declared?
Would you want to say something like that boards are allowed if the building is vacant but not if the building is occupied?
That would be fine. I just think people are going to protect their property.
If a building is vacant
then it would be allowed to have it boarded up. But if the building's occupied, then...
So we have a vacant house like the one that caught fire and they had boards on the window where that didn't declare to public use. It was vacant.
Well, the fact that it has boards on the windows would not make it a public nuisance but it could be a public nuisance for other reasons like it's partially constructed or partially burned down would still be a public nuisance for that reason.
I'll try to be as quick as I can with this. There are some details that I actually do agree with, but I'll be clear maybe there's a little distinction here. I do feel sorry for a low-income or fixed income property owner that owns a house that gets tagged and it's on them to deal with that. I think that the city... We have $8 million in reserves Dean doesn't like me saying this, but we should still find a way to engage in either creating a hardship abatement program.
And it frustrates me that we're just saying, oh there's no more volunteers. Well let's connect with Lompoc Teen Center. Let's connect with a few different people that can step up maybe in our new role to support this. I am frustrated. I don't feel, let's put it this way, I don' feel bad for a landlord of a property who has a gang make a territorial sign I'm going to go ahead and get started. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Protect your building, make sure they're clean boards and don't have a bunch of graffiti on it. But I guess the bigger picture thing for me is two things and I guess first question maybe for the city attorney in the last 15 years have we had any sort of lawsuits about private property or using city resources or working with non-profits or volunteers to go and abate graffiti? Have we had any litigation in that regard?
Not to my knowledge, no.
So I guess for me that I just don't really buy into a liability concern. I feel like a city can make priorities and if it wants to look nice and feel good about itself, that should be something that they can invest in. And again, I think there's creative ways for us to make sure that there are some funds that go to either hardship abatement issues or still funding somebody that might step up to help in that way. And I guess to that point about funding something, my last question is how much A year, give me a rough number that we spent. It's got to be a line item somewhere that went towards graffiti abatement.
I know it's a code enforcement thing part of their job etc., sending letters but I guess just paint and supplies is this half a million dollars a year or
3:48 – 3:5414 turns
Keith Quinlan, Solid Waste. We currently have a part-time graffiti abatement individual works 19 hours a week and has paint supplies to cover graffiti those are the major expenses in addition to a vehicle
So, I mean 50 grand a year? Approximately
50 grand. It's probably a little less than that.
Yeah so again for less than the price of us setting up a tax we could afford to keep invested in somebody staying on top of some of this and We have a lot of private property owners, but we also have a lot of renters here. And I just want to make sure there's not a loophole for landlords to just wait and wait and wait and get past their first notice and not care. And then the side effect is that our city looks really bad.
Where it appears that we've given up and washed our hands of caring about that as an issue. I'd still love for us to prioritize it in some way. I know that's a lot, but it frustrates me that we're kind of just putting it on the victim.
Any other questions? Do I need public comment again since I hit it earlier?
You don't need to, but you can if you would like.
Chief Mariani was around, they worked with me and there was anywhere between five and 10 pastors. And we would literally just go primarily in the higher density areas EFGLMN. And we literally on a Saturday morning would get up at like 7am in the morning. And I would take my little truck and we'd have about four different colors and we just would paint. In the two years that we did that, we wouldn't be halfway down the alley and they'd be behind us again.
And it was just a cat-and-mouse game. We just did it and we did it and we did it. After awhile, it became lesser and lesser and lesser but what you'll find is I see there are a handful of absentee owners. They won't come out but what you would see There's, I can go around the neighborhood where I know that they spray. The owner comes out and paints and then the next day it's sprayed. And so there's areas just it's a hodgepodge of a million different colors all over the walls because it's just a constant cat-and-mouse game with this thing.
Maybe 30 days is a little too much, maybe 15 days. But I just caution against re-victimizing the victim. I get it there needs to be something long term for it but I'm sure Councilman Ball, like you said, there's other groups that will do it. I would probably engage it again if I knew I would have cooperation from most of the property owners Sometimes the property management companies would call and say, don't touch our building. Sorry we won't do that again.
We try to match things as best as we could but most of the time they you know most property owners didn't have any problem if we just quickly went out because there was some pretty nasty stuff that were written on walls it wasn't just you know somebody's tag name or stuff sometimes they were Threatening people they were writing bad things about people. So we wanted to get that stuff down just as quickly as possible and Although I will say that the city seems to be doing a pretty good job about abating most graffiti now, I mean It seems that it's only up a few days and it's down so Thank you
Anybody else? All right, close public comment. We're back to council. So I had a number of items that I put on there, the indelible ink. I'll go down from 30 to 15 days on there. Yeah, OK. And then you said find Mario if it happens to be public property? Isn't that what the chief said? He said, right? You good with that, Mario? Are you good with that? Yeah.
Got him?
I don't
even know what he's saying.
I said if it happens on public property we blame Mario, we fine him and he said yeah so we're good shaking him down
Mayor, if I could just add for the public that we have a call-in number and an online number for graffiti so people can report it. And it's on the city's website at the citizen complaint form and 875 ASAP. We're
putting in the code that we're not doing it anymore. So I know that's...I got you. But there's people that are out there, anyhow. I get it, I hate graffiti and the guys doing it, you know? Stinks. So take out the modified, put the written permission and I've got the indelible ink.
3:54 – 4:0041 turns
At that it has to be for the purpose of defacing property, right?
Right. What else did we have? We had the other thing that Steve had on the...
We had put back in the paragraph C if they notified the city they would get helped.
Right because you say you already got it right? You already have the graffiti going?
Yeah, we have a part-time graffiti abatement. But that's for your stuff, right? That's for public facing
areas. Oh, for public, okay. There's a clause in there that you took out. Yeah, see...
Should the property owner contact the city within 48 hours after the occurrence of graffiti vandalism, the city shall assist in coordinated labor by volunteers or city employees to remove graffiti and will furnish the property owner or volunteer workers with supplies. Is that something that you guys wanted to keep in? What did you want it to...?
Oh, I think there should be some option. And again we're finding out that we've got a 19 hour a week person that takes care of the public stuff if the council thinks they want their city to look nice maybe we consider at least funding that if not more. Does
that defeat your guys ability to find though?
No. To find the public. They've only got 48 hours it's such a short timeline
but we don't have a mechanism to go on private property to go and abate people's
This clause has been in there for a long time.
Yeah, and that's why we're cleaning those up. Public facing only but if somebody... No it
doesn't say that.
No, that's currently what they practice is public facing.
I know but you have in the code today that if they contact you within 48 hours you'll go help them And I'm saying leave it in there. You're not trying, but it was removed and I'm saying I would prefer it stayed in. You've already previously said you haven't had one in a year so we're not talking about a big expense should you get one. It'll be the person's property. Item C are you
supporting to stay in?
Remind me of the specifics of that part.
This is should the property owner contact the city with $40 after the occurrence of graffiti vandalism The city shall assist in coordination of labor by volunteers and city employees to remove graffiti and will furnish the property or volunteer supplies
So I'm just putting it out there. Me personally, I would definitely prefer that because it's the city making a conscious choice to abate graffiti not just on our public spots but where it exists in our community if that means that we as a council have to prioritize that and make sure it's funded and that we have to work safely through the City Attorney to make sure volunteers are not overstepping or whatever. But we've already kind of clarified that we haven't gotten any litigation in 15 years about I think it's something that we could take a look at. Something we could do.
I just, it's just a useless piece of paper that we're creating.
It's 9.16.040. Thank you Stacy. Required signs.
I mean, if it's duplicitous with the state already then yeah. I don't know if state...
Currently, I'm not sure if that is a state law but currently Walmart and I believe Home Depot do have signage for... I
was in Home Depot today and
I looked specifically for those
signage.
For the spray paint areas?
Oh, it has spray paint but it doesn't for all the indelible markers.
No,
it doesn't. It covers mainly spray paint. Yeah. And I think they're doing the spray paint because it's a state law.
I believe you're right, and they secure those.
So we don't have to repeat every state law. Put it in our codes. It's the state law.
I'm okay with taking the required signs off. If we see something, we can bring it back.
I don't mind either, it's the enforcement mechanism doesn't exist.
Yeah. All right. We got them? Got everything? We're good. So there's my motion to make. Seconded by Bridge. Let's go vote. Woohoo! Passes 5-0.
I have one thing to say. It's a sign you did a great job, that we can sit up here and get to the level and communicate back what we want. So that may have been received as criticism or wasn't, I saw it as working with you to get something that's better. And I appreciated that it was here at Red Lines, and it was a good job.
Good. Thank Terry for us, right? Mario? All right. See? Besides, he's going to pay the fines! We're good to go. All right. Oral communications. Last two minutes of oral communications.
Huh?
Yeah, yeah. Right here. Right
here.
4:00 – 4:066 turns
Good evening Mayor, Council Members. I'd like to address some of the public safety resource limitations and open drug use and graffiti that we just heard about. My name is Joe Clemmer. I'm speaking on behalf of the Crown Point Homeowners Association. As you know, Crown Point neighborhood is located on the southwest side of Lompoc and borders a high fire danger area in and around the Badger Trail lookout point.
We're here tonight requesting the City of Lompoc support to fund and install three flock camera systems and Crown Point to address ongoing public safety issues that have persisted for more than two decades. Our goal is simple, improve safety provide actionable evidence to Lompoc police and deter ongoing criminal and nuisance activity in the neighborhood Crown Point residents have experienced repeated and ongoing issues including graffiti, noise disturbances late into the night after hours trespassing on Bodger Trail. Vehicles racing in both lanes from the cul-de-sac northbound on Z Street loitering open drug use public urination individuals engaging in sexual activity inside and outside the vehicles parked at the cul de sac Reported vehicle break-ins involving trail hikers and fires and or fireworks.
When police are contacted, response times can be lengthy as we heard earlier tonight. Disturbances can often continue for one to two hours before ending because of these recurring problems crowned Crown Point has paid for private physical security on Fridays, Saturdays and one additional roving day for the last 20 years. Our homeowners have carried this financial burden long term in an effort to protect public safety and quality of life.
My name is Lawrence Barbosa. I'm also with Crown Point Garden Society and what we're asking is that we have the city install two license plate readers, one at Z Street in Olive at the entrance there and on Fir and U Street. And also a PTZ camera which is pan tilt zoom camera at the top of Z Street in the cul-de-sac of Bodger Trail. Both units, all three units will go on existing city polls and the cost for those, the subscription for those cameras are $2,500 for the license plate reader cameras a year.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So we're asking if you guys will help fund those three cameras.
If you want to leave your name and number with the city manager, we can see about that and see if we need to agendize it or what can happen or figure it out okay? Means there was an agenda item we can't discuss it and blah blah blah all right thank you guys for waiting Anybody else? Last two minutes. I see nobody else rise, we'll close oral communications. Bring it back to Council comments and meeting reports.
Councillor Vega.
No reports. Councillor Member Bridge.
So a couple sessions ago, maybe last session, we had a report on the impact fees. And one that caught my eye particularly was the street maintenance or the street impact fee, it's got about $3 million in it. I kind of went off and researched what controls those impact fees and its government code section 66001 The statute states that a fee may include the cost attributed to decreased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to refurbish existing facilities or to maintain the existing level of service, or achieve an adopted level of services consistent with general plan.
To find out how that's defined, you have to go to the nexus report. The Nexus Report on Impact Fees for Streets has lots of signalization. So they're going to signalize all of H Street. We're going to signalize all of H Street. It's still got the bridge in there. Within the limits of, I guess, the agenda. So I'd like the staff to come back and tell us what it would take to update the nexus report so that it included refurbishment of city streets.
That would allow us for certain projects to use that funding to fix the streets. To put this in context $3 million is about what we would raise with a new tax per year So it's not an insignificant amount of money We could have Jeff look at and see if I'm misinterpreting the code. I don't think I am but it's always possible So if I could get council concurrence for staff to review that and come back and report to us
so without getting in depth of the agendas item, I'm not sure which Nexus report you're looking at but We have a new report that was the impact fee
4:06 – 4:1835 turns
Yes, but the old one that I was provided by staff is a draft. The
one from 2002 is what the money was collected under so that relates to that next report and what the projects were.
Okay well let's have staff come back and tell me that. That's all I'm
asking. Jeff Staff? I get it. You could do homework without making a staff report with it and talk with the city attorney so you understand. I was going to go ahead and make a motion we extend the meeting. Closed session coming up after this, I was going to go ahead
and make a motion we extend
the meeting until 2330. Wait till the colors go on. That's where we have colors.
You mean 1130? 1130, is that what you mean?
I'm a 24-hour guy of course.
I am not. Thank you.
1130 is his motion. Are you ready? There it is. He found colors. There you guys go. We have a motion by Councilman Starbuck seconded by Ball. Mayor is ready to go home. Should we make a motion to send him home? All right,
is
that it?
Councilman Starbucks? Well if I got the opportunity I guess I'll go ahead and tell my wife happy birthday. It's still an hour left today.
She's probably happy you're not there.
So I have nothing to report, just maybe a Council request and this is tongue-in-cheek. Maybe a larger pot of coffee for all of our guests that have to stay up this late.
Of all the meetings I went to, I went to LAFCO, SPCAG. I went to the Parks Commission meeting, Utility Commission meeting, Beautification Committee, Planning Commission meeting. The Utility Commission meeting was canceled because it wasn't properly noticed and also a quorum didn't show up after the fact as it was but anyhow so I would like to have there's been a project that's been on the book for 12-14 years And as the transit facility, and I think we should actually get an update about what's going on with the transit facility. As I see this project is growing towards potentially a $30 million project now or something. We never seem to catch it. Was it $12 million?
If I could get two other people who want to hear what's going on with the transit facility. Anybody else? You want to hear about it? Councilor Vega, do you want to hear about transit facility? No, not tonight. All right so I got a Starbuck and a Vega. The other thing is we are working for with the Bodger property moving forward they came and talked to me about something but i'm asking for three people allow me to be a liaison In the official capacity with the group, whatever they call themselves that are trying to move forward with the Bodger property. If I can get two other people, Council Member Starbuck?
That's a yes for Council Member Starbuck and I got a council member Bridge and a council member Vega. We've got Bridge, Vega and Starbuck. All right, all right. So another item that I'm very concerned about that we need to keep ahead with and that is the component of the county's environmental justice element that's up there is going in their general plan and I think that we should be engaged with this To make comments. We know what the county did to us with our general plan over the years in many different ways, but I think we need to have the attorney get some comments in this that will light us up and another document is important as SBCAG is working on their environmental justice component and as your representative And I will try to keep it as short as I can.
If you look through this document, you'll see with the variables and parameters they analyzed that they used voting blocks and we know that we're 9.8% of the population yet we're 18% of the poverty voting blocks in the county. So it was twice the statistically The environmental justice. Whatever you want to call it existence of poverty in our community and the environmental justice component lines with that, there are a lot of other items that in both these documents would allow us.
To defend ourselves what's going on? Environmental Justice is basically in certain points. You don't force through the very bills here exasperate people's lives. to over-encumber the community of Lompoc, which is already doing twice its work as pretty much every other region. But if we could get a letter... If I could get two other people to support a letter going to the county general plan on environmental justice component defending us and do you need something else at all or whatever? I need to say that allow you to use what's in these documents and whatever you can find it to defend us.
Recognize what's going on, I should say Is, can I get a couple of head nods?
What's the letter?
The letter would be for the city attorney to draft up.
Can we see it?
We're running out of time because it's March 10th. Council Member Vega. Council Member Starbuck. I mean, I don't know is there a way that we could see it? We're running out of so much...
I can try to get it on the March 3rd agenda.
Okay. Yeah, I'd definitely like to see what's in the water. Yeah, I agree too. I trust the attorney to defend us. We're allowed him to write on the carb and the landfill. I would think that this... Well he wrote a letter.
I
got
to see it.
Okay. That carb letter was just a question. I
got you.
It wasn't
a comment. This is a question and a statement but we need to defend ourselves All right, I had a head so we can see. The other shout out to Animal Control. I know we were having complications getting the police department to work with them but they did get the county. So three of the wild dogs down there, they were able to get the sheriff to help them to get that. I guess there are still a couple more wild dogs that are biting people down in the riverbed but a shout out to Animal Control for getting it and the sheriffs getting him help.
Which brings the Crown Point guys left, but I'm very frustrated with what's going on with open-air drug use on our main corridor. I think a lot of people are very frustrated and I don't know if the city manager could come up with a plan whatever it might be to get to the conclusion of this. It's in the public space It's McDonalds, it's US Bank, it's 99 Cent Store. It's all the way down to the corner but I shared a picture with you the other day of meeting the city manager right there with a propane torch burning fentanyl right there on foil and they didn't give a rat's ass and you've seen it as well but we need to address the 15-20 people that are just doing it In holding our town hostage, I was talking to somebody the other day that in the last five or six years has had over $100,000 in damage on their properties because of this rampant drug use that's going on.
And we must address this. I'm very frustrated with what's going on. I am asking that the city manager come back with a plan or results Roughly 30 days, not the next meeting but the following meeting. So I'm kicking this down the road so I can get two other council members to support.
So I'll just say this, I consider that a noble issue that needs to be addressed. I know that we have limited resources but we do have reserves in the bank for a rainy day and this is considered a rainy day in that context so if that includes a plan to beef up or to staff up so that the police department can address that or code enforcement, whomever- I support you. I'll support it. Okay,
I got Council Member... You support me too? Support me? There's all five of us on that statement There's about 20 people that are really causing most of this problem. I'd like to see if he came back and said, I did it. And with that... Public Safety Commission meeting tomorrow. So we're going to roll off. I get to do oral communications for closed session, correct?
We have one, one item on closed session we get to go into because we haven't had enough fun yet and that's the Conference of Legal Counsel Anticipated Litigation. Exposure litigation government code nine or five four nine five six dot nine anybody want to come up and speak?
While waiting for public comment on this item I want to note for the record that Councilmember Bridge does own property That is directly involved with the issue we're gonna be talking about in closed session as one of the property owners. So he's gonna be recusing himself from that discussion.
All right, so Council Member Ridge gets to go home and the rest get to go into the dungeon. I see nobody rise for oral communications. You wanna hit that? We're going into closed session. All right, welcome back. Welcome back. Report on action taken.
Thank you Mayor. City Council met in closed session to discuss the one item of significant exposure litigation listed on the agenda. Council gave direction to staff no reportable action taken.
All right with that any questions comments? We're out of here All right, we adjourn to regular meeting at 6.30 p.m., March 3rd.