UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:01 – 0:072 turns
You. Thank you. You. Thank you. All right, welcome back. Stepping up a little bit earlier I'm going to ask you to report out of the City Attorney would report on the action taken during closed session?
Sure thank you Mayor. The City Council met in closed session there were three items on the agenda. The City Council conducted item number one which was the performance evaluation of the city manager. City Council gave the city manager a satisfactory review The City Council also directed the city manager to initiate the process of filling the assistant or deputy city manager position. That was the conclusion of the performance evaluation. City Council did not consider or conduct the discipline dismissal release closed session, or the appointment of the interim closed session.
0:08 – 0:1425 turns
All right. Well, that concludes the closed session and we're going to at 637 begin the open session Joint City Council Planning Commission meeting and we get the long roll call
Commissioner Morgan heard
President
Roll call, called by City Clerk · 1 under review
Show transcript
So report on action. You guys ready? You guys had a busy year, right? Report on action with your annual reports. Do I need to take public comment first before we review? City Attorney?
You can take public comment anytime you wish during the item.
Mayor, I just don't know if you wanted to present or just assume the document is being presented or
what?
We're not doing a presentation obviously. Are we doing a presentation of the annual report?
I am not aware of that.
No, so I'm asking should I take public comment now or do you want to take public comment?
That's up to your discretion mayor. Let's
have public comment right now on the annual report. Thank you very much. Deliberations any questions you guys want to highlight you guys want to talk about your annual report? What do you got going on
right, so I'll just review the major project items that we went over the two big ones. I would say were the 2030 general plan safety element as well as a planned circulation element A next big one item we did was updates to the ADU section of the zoning code as well as We reviewed the Accessory Dwelling Unit, the PRADU program which should be going live. It looks like third quarter of 2026 and then we review of the general plan zoning code amendments for consistency with the adopted SV CAG airport land use compatibility plan and then there was a few projects. The village at PCH residential project Lompoc Theater Project, Toyota of Lompoc, Chick-fil-A.
And then we also reviewed our general plan annual report and the planning commission annual report. That concludes our major projects slash items. Council Member
Ridge you have a question?
Just on the annual report what is the Art Deco Mixed Unit? What is that? It was one of the projects. Greg's coming up, I
think. Oh right. I think that's a future one so we'll let Greg answer it.
Yeah, that's a future project. I don't remember off the top my head how many units it is but it's a residential mixed-use project but it's currently being reviewed.
Okay, so is the Art Deco the theme that it's going to be?
That's just name that we have for it right now. Yeah
okay thank
you.
Councilor Boehl. Sure, thank you guys all for your hard work and trying to thread many needles when we need it the most. I'm curious just the progress of the theater project. I know you guys have done a lot of work. I think they've hit some milestones. Just wanted to get your sense of what's happening there, how it's going and are there predictable hurdles that still exist perhaps in the near or distant future that either your body or us as a council might consider? That was my general question.
So that particular project did go before Planning Commission and was approved. So right now it's in building permit stage. It's still being reviewed by Building Permit, and I know there is, in the future I think there's a item coming to Council regarding the alley easement but that's coming in August potentially.
Is there a timeline for how long it needs to be at City Hall to bounce around? In
terms of the building permit, well they're doing it in phases. So I believe we're on phase two right now, I want to say. So it is being done in phases. It's a little hard to say when the last phase will be but I know the phase that we're currently It includes an addition in the back and the moving of the old building to the front. And then there will be some tenant improvements, and future items would include a renovation
0:14 – 0:1913 turns
Awesome. Well, just personally speaking I'd love to be kept kind of abreast of that progress. I know they have some and again anything can happen but they have goals of at least having a first phase opening and starting to entertain people perhaps next year which is their 100th anniversary so again if there are hurdles that pop up or things that are going to absolutely delay those those hopes I'd love to be educated about those things as we go forward thank you
I attended, I think most of your guys' meetings and you guys are getting the groove and working together a little more consistent flow. I think you had one meeting was and it was running after nine o'clock. I had to jet on that when that was getting a little rough Do listen to you guys on the radio? I think it's nice to have that out there You listened to him on the radio too Councilman Starbuck right yeah he does so What do you guys think was the the toughest one you had to get through I know the safety element, you guys chewed on that quite a bit.
I think that was maybe the broadest things that we've addressed this past year. I think issues on the safety element, we could have talked for another five hours and really pieced it apart. But yeah, I think for me that was significantly something that should be continually re-evaluated and continually changed. I think there were a lot of elements regarding literacy, regarding expectations of literacy, regarding like just evacuation planning for example. Like people don't know north and south you know but that was one of the things I remember we talked about that I'm not sure if it made on to the updated element or We should, as a city, regularly continue to dive into deep and maybe having joint meetings within public safety and things like that with the Planning Commission as well.
But the safety component was probably my number one.
One of the things that doesn't really happen, I believe it's supposed to by state law is a review of the impact fees annually with recommendations to council. I know for probably 20 plus years it wasn't being done and I think it's important that maybe that can be revitalized. I still think it's state law city attorney. The old Maximus report in the back of the book said it was but
that it has to go through the Planning Commission every year?
They're supposed to review it annually with recommendations to the Council on the impact fee. I'll show you where I've made
it.
Maybe, maybe. But I think that's a critical thing, another component that aligns but one of the good things I have to say is a lot of the people come in front of you they kind of understand which way they're going to go with you and a lot of time when a developer comes up and they're not sure...I've seen older Planning Commission meetings Oh my goodness, argue about I don't know some of the simplest items. What color of the rock was going to be on a building for two hours?
And I just got to say it's in talking with the developers is a breath of fresh air to have somebody. Some of you guys meetings are 10 minutes. And when people have that much money invested, that is a really good sign for them. That they know that they're gonna get through it and they know that you are staying consistent with the rules, ordinances as such and you're not dreaming up some...
Don't change but I'm just saying it's a good thing. So thank you guys for what you're doing and I think there's a lot of people out there that as well like the continuity of your thought process
Well if I could piggyback again, sorry. I think the things and the only way we could have a 10 minute meeting is if Greg and the rest of the planning staff does everything right so we only get to have those good short meetings when it's presented to us in a way that makes it very simple for us to go yes or no and move on so shout out to
Greg and everyone else. Let me shout out to them too and your new guy Connor the other night that was like Five or six minutes on that, dividing a parcel. Or combining it to six then dividing it back to two right? Something like that right but good job with that and Chair did as well the other night did a couple months ago did a really good job with that one that helps you guys flow through get to that so yeah you guys seem to be teaming up well with that.
Anybody else on this before we go to the next one?
Yeah, I'll go ahead. Oh
yes!
So I would say any of these elements are always hard to get through it's a lot of information we're giving and it's a lot of prep work because we are those first eyes before it gets to you but I would say yeah it's just a lot of working with the elements other than that it's always fun seeing what new projects are coming into town. How about you Mr. Cox?
0:19 – 0:397 turns
I really appreciate Greg and the staff doing most of the work for us. We just have to review it, do a little common sense and talk about it. It seems to work real well for us so thank you.
Nobody else? I guess we'll kill this item and go on to the next, right? You good? Not sure if you had something else. I've got you in a tizzy fit again. All right. So
move on to item number two. You gotta get a stay there for all that, Item number two is Review and Discussion of the 2050 General Plan Assets, Issues, Opportunities and Vision and Guiding Principles Report. The purpose of the workshop is to provide an overview of the report, summarize input received from the community that informed the report or receive feedback from the Planning Commission, City Council and the public. I did reach out to the base to see if some of them would show up because it'd be nice for them.
They keep singing that song about all the jobs coming out there It's right off the bat, let me say I don't remember the page number but I thank Greg for connecting that. Mr. Stones for connecting that on identifying that regional aspect as where the SPCAG was just identifying 2400 jobs by the year 2060 and you're saying there are 7000 plus? The
I am going to introduce our consulting general representative from Mintage Harnish. We've had the pleasure of working with Ryan and his team for the last couple of years between the housing element, the environmental justice element, safety element and the circulation element As the City Council made the decision to move forward with the rest of the elements earlier this year, and what you're being presented here tonight is the background information and also the visioning and assets and issues. So I'd like to introduce Ryan and he's going to make the first presentation.
Okay. Thank you for having me today, my name is Ryan Lester and I'm with Mintier Harnish. Yes,
that podium is
getting taller. There's the magic... Oh this is okay. I'm cool here. Okay thank you for having me today. Ryan Lester with Menteer Harnish. We're here today to talk about the Assets Issues and Opportunities and Vision and Guiding Principles Report. It's a super long name mainly because we took two reports and for efficiency put them into one. The report itself is a summary of the engagement that we've done through the project so far.
I'll go over what those events were, but really the report is the initial reflection of what we've heard in the initial engagements. So we've used the style of presenting it as what are the city's assets? What are the issues and what are the opportunities? As a way to summarize what we've heard So today, we'll review that report and then we'll look for feedback from you all. I want you to respond to what we're reporting that we heard from the public and we wanna get your feedback in your direction moving forward.
So our agenda, I'll do a quick project overview. I won't linger too long on that but in case anybody hasn't been involved with the general plan so far, I wanna catch you up. I'll quickly summarize the engagement that we've done And then I'll lead us through two discussions. One on the assets issues and opportunities, and we'll pause for a small discussion to get your feedback on those things. And then we'll go over the draft vision and guiding principles, and we'll have another discussion.
And I'll explain what those are as we go. So project overview. This is the 2050 general plan. We're doing it in two phases, so we've completed phase one with the circulation wrapping up shortly. Phase one included three or four required elements, so housing element, environmental justice, safety and circulation, and now the city is underway with phase two where we'll be updating three required elements, the land use element Conservation, open space element and the noise element. And then looking at the rest of the city's optional elements to both update those but also see if there's opportunities to consolidate those with the required elements.
Okay. Did I skip one? No. So where we're at so far, we've completed project initiation and the existing conditions phase. This included the existing conditions and trends report that you referenced earlier. We published that for public review. We took comments on that, we revised it and republished the final draft on the project website. We held community workshop one and then this report, the Assets to Shop Opportunities Report, and then tonight's meeting.
We've also been working on the next phase, which is general plan assessment. And that's where we're going policy by policy through your existing general plan and talking to staff, getting staffs comments on it, incorporating those ad hoc comments in there. And that's like our first step behind the scenes of looking at how the policies are working with staff.
And so that's been underway. Part of that is me reviewing all the documents staff is sending me, you know we really need to have a thorough understanding of what's happening in the city in order to plan policy for the future. Next tasks coming up. So the next phase we'll be entering is the land use alternatives phase This phase is pretty fun where we're going to look at where there are opportunities Potential opportunities for growth and what might that growth look like right? What do we want to plan for in those opportunity sites or focus areas, whatever we boil in on We will have will produce a report and then we'll also have study sessions with both the Planning Commission and the council to discuss that and to get your direction on that And then starting in December, we'll start drafting the general plan.
So that's a six-month process. It will include engagement as well, more workshops, more meetings with both bodies. This is our full schedule. I know you can't read this but the point of showing it here is this is a three year project. We split up the tasks and phases by fiscal year And currently we're doing great. We're right on schedule It's it is a there's a lot of tasks and a lot move a lot of moving parts, and we're working very hard to stay on schedule I've got a little bit of a zoomed in schedule this shows the next fiscal year so at I have a red box they're showing the phases will be covering so land-use alternatives again, and then in the Next six months after that preparing the general plan So we're cooking We had a bunch of exercises, survey and a bunch of cool stuff in this room but also we knew that it's really hard to get people to come to traditional workshops.
So we also went to them. So we did two pop-up events, one at the library and one at the pickleball courts during the hot hour for pickleball. And we brought surveys and comment cards and just got extra input. Just trying to meet people where they're at. Staff also went to a senior health event in May, we had an online survey and then we did stakeholder interviews with the school district and with Allan Hancock College. To talk to them about what do they envision for the future? What are their needs you know where are they going and how can we possibly have some partnerships right This is just the front page of our survey Really in our early engagement. We are really talking about what are the strengths of the city, right? What are some of the challenges the city faces right and then where where do we want to go from there for the visioning?
We really wanted to ask people what you love about your city and where do you want it to go in the future? Right. What is your vision for the future and Because if we don't understand that then we don' really know where we're going All right, here's one of our comment cards. It's just like a postcard and we had these on the table and people could fill them out.
I thought this one was pretty representative of a lot of the answers that we heard so I love Lompoc because it's a small community with friendly residents, moderate weather, and all the rocket launches you can watch for free, right? Those are a lot of the things that touches on three or four of the things that we heard from a lot of the community. The online survey had, I think we had 50 responses in addition to our physical survey responses.
I put a couple up here because they're pretty representative. This question is looking 25 years in the future What will be the key industries and employers? And what you can see here is the space industry, space, SpaceX, medical industry. And so you started to see a lot of repetition. You see what's really valuable to quite a few people. The next one is on housing.
What we saw with housing is that it doesn't matter who you are, you probably want your housing to be a little cheaper, right? Having housing that is more affordable at any income is really important, right? Answers were single-family homes, smaller single-family homes. More affordable at my income whatever that may be and that was definitely a trend that we saw. Some people mentioned apartments, some people mentioned single family homes for sale, some people mentioned rentals. It feels like everybody kind of wishes the housing was a little bit cheaper and a little bit more affordable So I want to jump in and start talking about some of the specific things that we heard. I'll run through these, I won't read every single one of them because it's quite a lot and it's on the screen but I'll discuss some key ones and then we'll have a discussion and I'll ask you what you think.
So the assets, issues and opportunity really is the part that summarizes what we heard from the community. We've organized it by topic because you start to see some topics come out and it just makes it easier to understand and to see a connection between an asset, an issue and what the opportunity may be if you're looking at it by topic rather than just a huge list.
So for land use, one of the big things we heard was the commercial corridors really are an asset in the town. People really like H&Ocean. Another asset is the anticipated population job growth. A lot of people mentioned it, there's a lot of buzz and excitement about potential jobs at the base and all the contractors and other things, the other jobs that can be generated from that as well.
And then this small town feel we really heard about people love their neighborhoods they love the small town feel of the town As far as opportunities, you know, expanding city limits or figuring out how to have some more capacity both for commercial as well as for residential. And maybe looking at infill development and redevelopment as well as expanding the city limits. And then really optimizing the land use mix, right? Figuring out Okay, is our current land use mix really maximizing our potential? There's an opportunity to do that. Of course that's what the alternative phase is for.
Community character, we heard that people like their neighbors. They're happy with their community. They're happy with their neighborhoods. They like public art. They like wineries and wine tasting. The weather is a huge asset in the community. Everyone mentioned it. I live in Sacramento, it's like 105 today. I'm happy to be here right? The weather is awesome!
And then some of the things we heard issues wise you know just we want more activities right especially for kids more activities would be awesome and then just you know community outreach and people really like the murals expanding public art however that may be possible might be something that should be considered Conservation of open space, the surrounding environment really is part of how people see and understand the town. They really value it.
So the environmental setting is an asset. Some of the opportunities we heard was expanding access to healthy food would be good. Expanding access to open space, right? Dialing those things in and then really this historic sites and the native plant environment is really an opportunity that people connect with and they like their environment and they relate Lompoc with that. So any way of encouraging or expanding on that idea.
As far as noise, people love their quiet neighborhoods. They really do. The residential neighborhoods really are peaceful, right? On the topic of noise, yes, rocket launches have noise and vibration impacts, right? We need to be aware of that when we're planning As part of the general plan. And then, you know, opportunities related to noise if there's any way to prepare for launches make it an event let people know that it's happening because some folks have are sensitive to noise and vibration impacts so those were some ideas that were thrown out Parks and Recreation, people really like the parks programming. We got a lot of feedback that they really liked the program. At the same time they said if we're looking 25 years in the future we can't do those same programs let's continue to evaluate and expand and react to what the needs are in the community.
That really was one of the opportunities that we heard. I want to start by saying thank you for continuing to adjust to meet changing needs. People really like the bike park and looking for any ways to expand opportunities As far as public services, the school facilities really are an asset. They have capacity to grow. If the city grew a little bit tomorrow they wouldn't have to go build a new facility. They do have some improvement needs but the school facilities themselves are an asset. Allan Hancock College is an asset we spoke with them and they are really geared at providing the services that the local workforce needs.
And that's part of their vision for the future. Right? Library system, getting around town. The transportation and mobility around town is really an asset. It's easy to get around town. You know there were a few people that mentioned road maintenance but as far as moving around and the mobility, the circulation system you know people seemed to feel it was an asset Opportunities so expanding access to education You know, improving and expanding local infrastructure as possible.
And then yard maintenance programs was something that came up a lot. Beautification. A lot of people said hey I think we can work on yard maintenance and code enforcement or anything that we have to do to make sure that we don't have vacant commercial buildings where the landscaping is just overgrown right? Things like that. That was mentioned quite a bit. And then finally, creating partnerships where possible. I'm sure the city already does this but this is something that we heard was creating partnerships with local organizations that have similar goals in order to more efficiently achieve those goals together right?
And then economic development, so assets. The large employers, the medical employers, the base, the correctional complex and all the jobs there were mentioned as an asset. Local businesses, there's a lot of local small businesses in Lompoc. There are big box stores but there are a lot of local small businesses and many people mention that. And then events, a lot of people mention events. They like what we have they want more right? So that's both an asset and an opportunity Other opportunities just continue to support job opportunities and business growth Do whatever we can to encourage a reduction in commercial vacancies You know a lot of people Said maybe that's an opportunity. They didn't you know they don't know how to do that That's for the next stages in the in the plan, but that was definitely something that was was identified as something folks wanted beautification promoting tourism, and then a big one is capitalizing on the excitement around tech space in the future.
There's a lot of excitement almost everyone mentioned it you know the base comes up with everyone you talk to and especially the jobs there and expected jobs there people are really excited about that So with all that, I just wanted to ask and get a discussion going with what do you really feel are the city's largest assets that we need to capitalize on in the general plan?
I put some up here just as, you know, just to get your thoughts going or whatever just based on what we heard. But I would really like to know from you all what you think the largest cities' assets are that we really need to capitalize on.
0:39 – 0:4916 turns
Let me first go up by saying a lot of your reports that you got back from people, I think it gets a little skewed when you're You know, obviously in a park or the pickleball court because you've got a different section that's saying, hey, pickleball is the most important thing. Or if you go to the senior center, you're going to get yeah I like the free bus rides.
So what I saw you, the place that you grew up, the library of course they're going to say the library, I hope they are enjoying it and can say it's the most important thing so I think it's important when you are polling these numbers and it's tough As it says in the report here, 77% of the people are now leaving town for work. So I don't think you got, in fact a lot of them here that people live in town but they didn't have jobs and that you were grabbing the things from them so it's important as we're trying to drive this document forward that there were polling and these numbers from sort of say everybody maybe especially It's, some of them are just getting home right now.
And it looks like we missed out a lot of that in finding what that section of the town needs. I don't know how you're going to be able to get them because a lot of them are too darn busy to report and some of the things that are perpetuating that number in 1990 was 40% of the town used to commute And in 2016 I think it was 60%. And now it's at 77. Now granted we have a lot of them at the base or something like that, but that's... We need to get to those people and find out what it is they want.
Right? Council Member Ridge.
I wanted to start with a question first. When you say city's largest assets, is that potential assets or today we have
that? Well yet we are planning looking out to 2050 so yeah I would say looking towards the future. We of course want to not completely forget about our assets now right so it could go either way I guess.
Well, I think for a city our size and some of the attributes are contradictory in a sense because I really love in a small town living there but you don't have enough to do. Those are kind of counterintuitive. But as far as our existing assets, I think it's obvious the base and commercial space. Classified because there is a move occurring or culture change that's occurring out of that base from what was traditionally government space, which might be once a year launch or twice a year to commercial space, which is two times a week or wherever we end up. So I think that's an asset.
River Park and River Bend Park, that whole area there could be a potential asset. We could meld those two parks together and create opportunities within that. I personally think pale blue dot is a future asset and it could very well be a signature attraction for the city, even if it only succeeded half as well. And I didn't see it in the report but the city voted for that.
Thought I was on Economic Development Committee 25 years ago and it seems like we constantly want to fight what we are. We are a bedroom community, so whatever we can do to enhance that. Obviously we want jobs. But even if it's out at the base, we come home to Lompoc. And so things like safety and the parks and the clean houses, all of that revolves around in my mind to it being my city.
I love living here and I come home here. In the past bedroom community almost seemed like a negative thing to say but In this day and age, maybe it's not. And I would see that as one of the reasons I moved here. So those would be my assets. Thank you.
Commissioner Cox, go ahead. Yeah,
I had a question. Out of the total recommendations up there how many people responded to give you these ideas?
We probably had 100 total.
Okay, so we have a town of 45,000 people and now we're taking recommendations from just 100. Is there any way you can get ahold of some of those 77% that drive out of town and find out if maybe you got 50 people working in one place? And somehow we could put a building here for them, city give them some tax breaks and free electricity for a few years and get those people to stay in town. Have you any way to track that or get their opinions?
Well, with our current engagement strategy that was not a priority. It was targeting a specific group. We did the best we could with our budget to have something and we actually threw in two extra events just to try to get some more that really stretched our budget, to be honest. I would love to and I would love to work with staff to make that work within the budget, absolutely.
Like Steve mentioned, 25 years ago he was on economic development. And basically you could rewrite his stuff then and it would be the exact same thing you put up there today. So instead of just getting us ideas we need to get the issues solved because I can give Like I said, you have 100 people who gave you an idea and you went to those two places to get those ideas.
So to me it just seems like we're redoing it and not really acting on anything.
Well, we aren't creating actions right now. That we're not even... We're two phases or three phases away from doing that. This is an exercise to make sure that I'm on the same page with all of you, right? And I know that may seem a little tedious and I'm sorry but that's it. I want to make sure that when I'm writing policy, I really understand what you and your constituents think are important And so part of the engagement approach is me coming to you and saying, what are you hearing in the community?
So in your recommendations, you will not provide any legal advice,
correct? No. I cannot provide legal advice.
Thank you.
Council Member Bull.
Yeah, just a couple of things. And again I think you make good points as we talk about the same things but again it's good to be aspirational and try to point towards some things. Just generally speaking for me, I still believe we're underachieving when it comes to our corridors so Asian Ocean and again if we talk about jobs, we talk about tourism, a lot of those people that do commute out-of-town do work in the hospitality sector or in the tourism sector Solvang gets one and a half million people a year for obvious reasons.
Obviously, if we could get 1% of that, we'd be in much better shape in terms of creating revenue opportunities, revenue to the city that we could invest in some of these other things that matter. So to me, that Highway One corridor or tourism making this place attractive having some pride I think all those things are They all matter, but those things kind of resonate with me. As far as events go I think and I love the events that we currently have but I think without sounding negative about it. Other cities around us have continued to evolve and create some new events and some fresh ideas, so again Lompoc has that luxury of having that beautiful moderate weather. Yes it does get windy sometimes but you know there's a good four or five months out of the year where I'm driving past a park that could be hosting an event.
It could be community centered or it could be pointed at people from out-of-town to actually come and visit stop and stay So I'd love to see more creativity in either standing up ideas ourselves or working with professionals to come engage with some new ideas. That would be something that I'd certainly be into. Two other things, and again this is just generally speaking, we have the lowest median income in the county. There's a lot of limitations to some of our folks. They may commute out-of-town for work but they still don't have enough money to even go to another town to do entertainment and enjoy things so they're stuck here. So I think for me anything that we can do to prop up and grow opportunities in parks and rec That is one of the greatest features of our city, is that we do put a lot of time and investment and effort towards giving a lot of young people opportunity.
I'd love to see that grow and stabilize and become a more critical part of our youth's future. And then last one is just business incentives. Again, whether it's an industry or a tech job, a tech company that has a lot of Lompoc employees in Goleta maybe try to attract them here but it could be things as simple as answering the question there's nothing to do in Lompoc so again reaching out to an owner of a bowling alley and saying hey might you consider coming here? Here's where it might work let me help you gauge the interest of those sorts of things and the city might be willing to have a conversation on how to get you started A quick question with Mr. Stones, everybody got these documents to provide when was the last public comment date on these?
For the assets
0:49 – 0:5529 turns
report? Yes
It was in June. I don't have it in front of me. I
don't remember the exact
date. I made a bunch of questions, comments on that stuff and you guys were able to incorporate quite a few of the things that I put in there and I appreciate
I think they're reflected in what I'm seeing, so.
You got them in? I
think so but I just talked to
them. I wasn't sure, I was just want to make sure everybody had an opportunity up here to get him in.
Well and I will say, I received your comments on the existing conditions and trends report which was the background report with all the data. Right. And we did make all those changes and go through all those comments. We did collect up all the comments. I wasn't
sure if everybody else had an opportunity to get something
in. With this report, the assets and opportunities report was published with agenda so we haven't taken your comments.
But the existing condition report you got
Yeah, yeah we took in everyone's comments that was willing to provide them and we made those changes.
Okay You didn't get any in? Did you get some I wasn't sure I wanted to make sure
so are you saying did I provide a specific list no I haven't done that but I've given my feedback
all right I just want to make sure everybody didn't fall through the cracks on The list but I appreciate
No, I mean check with
everyone else Go down the line. I'm just gonna ask Councilmember Starbuck next make sure That he got You had an opportunity? I had an opportunity.
I did not submit though.
Council Member Bridge? I made comments on this because it came to me this time directly.
I just wanted to make sure that it got out and didn't slide through the cracks. Am I welcome
to go over some of those for
you? Okay. Vega, you've got your reports? Okay, just making sure we didn't get slippage. All right, Council Member Starbuck.
Question and a suggestion. You're looking for input, and you know if you're looking for commuters and all that there is utility bills that go out every month if you wanted to pre-fill out A survey sheet that could be sent out in the utility billing and returned when the bill is paid. The only thing I guess would be a hassle is we may have to convert to full-size envelopes for return so it could fit in there, but that would be one way to get public input and really the cost would be menial at that point.
The question I had seemed as though way back when we kicked this off there was talk of I'm going to ask you a question.
No, the input we're receiving kind of touches on all the topics. Then you
will consolidate?
Yes exactly yeah when we start looking at the policies and breaking down that we have this big audit with all the policies and staff's comments to ad hoc comments then we'll start reconsolidating things
Councillor Boehme. I did have a quick question just for, you've done this type of work in many other places, I'm assuming. Let's talk sample size. Again, I think you made a good point. There are some other good points about did we get all the information? A hundred people, maybe it could be bigger or smaller but where does that fit into your career in terms of the sample size and are we missing an opportunity or is that a good enough sample to get the gist of what the community is about?
Well, I will say in any project, general plan project, I always wish I got more input. You're seeking it as much as you can but you have to educate folks and take their time and it is a lot. So I will always say I want more and more and more input that's why we try to promote these events too and let people know hey if you didn't you could come to this or you could put in a comment on our website. We try to make it as easy as possible within the budget of course But I will always take more comments. I will always encourage folks to comment as much as possible, just honestly.
But I will say that there were some key themes that came up No matter who we were talking to, right? The base. The potential growth at the base and excitement there, right? Everybody's excited about that whether you talk to someone at the library or someone at the pickleball court. You know, the folks at the pickleball court they appreciate the library as much as the folks in the library appreciate the pickleball court. I do realize that is limited but we're talking about key themes that we're hearing I'm not trying to get the focus on something that only one person mentioned, right?
If that's helpful.
0:55 – 1:0113 turns
It would be kind of hard not to have the base come up since there's a launch every week.
Yeah. I'm still thinking a lot of where the places you're going are very skewed. Okay. I mean, I get it. You get a lot of the stuff that's out there but there are a lot of things that I think are probably missing as well. If you went out and talked to contractors they're going to give you a whole different feel about it. You're talking to commuters? Obviously one of their largest assets they have here is they can afford to live here and not live in Goleta.
That's probably One of our largest assets is, well if the word gets out it's no longer be affordable right? Is there some level of affordability that we have here. Likewise when you talk to builders and developers right now what we did with our impact fees is one of main triggers on things that we did so people are talking about how to help stimulate business.
What we did there was a huge movement which could be taken away at any time of course but Like I said, there's a lot of... If you talk to the kids in the soccer they would say well it would be a good soccer field. Or the parents over there or something. So I can see there is a lot of... And I know you've got to do something. I get it. You have to pull the trigger but I really see that it is very slanted.
In the statements that are out there.
Yeah, and we are talking to residents right? We're talking to residents in out in the community right and so We didn't get a lot of comments on oh yeah The city's jamming me up when I'm trying to do an application Right like you would if you were talking to a developer or something like that, right?
Just saying I guess you know you got the pickleball court in the library at the senior center You're gonna get it skewed Skewed stuff so yeah any commissioners everything to say
Yeah, so I would say definitely one of the larger assets to focus on is that Vandenberg Space Force Base growth. How is the city going to collaborate with them or cooperate? What can we do with them to maximize job opportunities for the City of Lompoc residents? How do we make sure those employees that they're bringing in are coming home to Lompoc and not Orchid, or The Valley, or Goleta.
I think that would be a big thing to focus on there. Okay,
thank you.
Councilor Boehl? No, I agree. That's definitely a big part of this but there's also as our consultant might admit it's just a complicated path for figuring that out but I'm glad we're involved in those conversations but It does frustrate me that any time I'm going to Santa Maria, I'm seeing everyone that's coming this way and not the same traffic that comes into Lompoc. But again, I think that opens up the question of how do we create different housing opportunities for different types of workers? I think a lot of people in the space industry might skew a little bit younger or might not have a family yet. And it doesn't mean all of them but some of them Want to live in a downtown or have a lot more walkability or have some sort of cultural experience where they live and they might not care about yard, you know.
So again us embracing like what can we do inside the city where we can control growth and housing? And where can we push the envelope a little bit to expand our borders or to entertain new ideas for building out housing? I don't disagree. I do think that is for the next 10 years, it's probably going to be our either our biggest opportunity or the thing that will hamstring us the most in a big sense and everything else I think falls under that because when you're happy to live somewhere or you've got a new place or they built new housing, I think all of that translates to people looking for amenities trying to have a good experience and maybe even starting their own businesses and being supported here so I definitely agree with
He's taking notes. Sorry.
Do you ever research grants to help cities out, or that's not your expertise?
That's not part of our scope. OK. Yeah, that's the city of Lompoc's responsibility if we can find one. But we try to get some planning grants how we can. Okay, moving on.
So we may have covered this already but the next question was going to be what opportunities? Is there any future opportunities that we haven't talked about yet? We did mention Pale Blue Dot that we haven't talked about yet that I really need to be aware of. Anything I'm missing?
Anything you're missing off your master list is that what
you're asking? No, I mean just from our conversation and from my kind of recap.
1:01 – 1:088 turns
This is a big hill. I've been trying to climb it for awhile, but I think Ocean Park is an opportunity and I know it's not in our city. But if we lose that access below the railroad line, that's going to hurt. And I know they're a sacred bird but if we could find a slightly different approach to that, we can open up that section of the beach where people can actually get to it.
I just think that's an opportunity that if we could just figure out how to break the code. And I'm not against birds or marine areas, but I'm also for people and that's really the only location where people of less mobility can actually get to. The railroad station is just not a practical access point for anybody who's of my age. So there's an opportunity there that I don't think I saw when I went through this, probably because it's not in our sphere of influence but it is kind of where our people go to the beach. Okay thank you
Council Member Ball. Yeah, just a couple of kind of general ones but I do think we have a great opportunity with very limited spots to go big and especially within our city limits but really focusing on a creative use of mixed-use. I know we're pushing for that, I know that's incorporated quite a bit but trying to zoom ahead as much as we can look at what other communities have done in that mixed used close to downtown cultural experience urban lofts the whole deal and what might we do to use what we have knowing that is in our control versus a LAFCO decision that may or may not come?
And then I really feel strongly that even though we have limited open space in our industrial zoning area. I do think that with the right marketing and with the right vision, I think there's an opportunity if we believe that growth on Vandenberg is happening, there has to be some either support type of businesses, manufacturing, tech, you know somebody that's in the trade that uses their proximity, our proximity to South Vandenberg as one of the best features. So again, I think that with the vision there's an opportunity in some of our industrial spaces to start to support some of that growth that's happening on base and answer at the same time a few of those questions about not enough jobs etc. So that'll be two things. Great thank you.
Probably one that's the great overview of all of that it's the big battle any of those that are related to the city of course is the uh... expanding our tax base both through the property tax and sales tax component in town that's a lot of people can wish for all these things but while this stuff called money none of it matters they're just wishes so much up there on that list you can write it down all you want but if you can't pay for it, you're not going to get there granted a lot of those things help us to get there Expanding city limits.
Encourage development. If people can make money, they will develop. You don't want people to build something they can't fill. The same thing that people wanted to fill vacant retail sections, they still want us to have this affordable housing component that brings people in that don't have any money but they can't go back to the retail component. You know, we have to have as the arena plan say we need more above moderate housing.
That's probably one of the biggest things and people don't like to talk about it because it sounds like you're trying to bring people in that are making money and have jobs but I mean it really is as one of the biggest holes for the base to come here is they couldn't find the housing that those people wanted and everything right? The housing that they wanted, which was in that category.
And you can't get a lot of that other stuff that's on your list if you don't bring that to the table. And that's not really a feel. That's a reality. A lot of this stuff won't happen here. People don't have money. You can have all the events you want but somebody has got to pay for them for
Do you work with lobbyists in Sacramento?
I do not, no.
So basically all you have is suggestions and not really any solutions.
Right now I'm not making any suggestions. This is not my voice at all, this is what we heard from the community. This
is part of the steps of the next of the general plan. The document that we have to line up so if we can try to do things and forecast our future and we design this properly we can. Our general plan in the past has put massive limiters on us And a lot of the people who came and argued for that general plan, they didn't want growth. There was a lot of protectionism in there and this has made it very difficult for the city of Lompoc to expand.
This is lining this up, these are the beginning times of lining this document up. What's our total cost of this? About $1 million? We're going to spend on putting this general plan together. This is a guiding document for the future And if we don't, if we're not careful, we'll end up with something again that becomes very restrictive. It limits our ability to take care of ourselves, to expand and grow. There was a lot of agricultural protectionism in the previous document that made it very impossible for the bodger property be annexed. We limited ourself.
So we're trying to clean that up to move forward. What he's doing is bringing ideas and processing You have to go through the public engagement cycle, and the meet-and-greet cycle. This is one of the items that he has on his checklist to get us to that final document a couple years from now. So that's what he's trying to do is he's the big wig having to come down from Sacramento who's trying to help us get through our next steps as we get The guiding document of the city.
So that's what we're trying to connect and put together, and this is what he saw from a lot of people in what they're saying. We're just trying to get our input in there and line it up. All right? Councilmember Bridge.
1:08 – 1:1415 turns
I'm probably going to show my ignorance on the agenda. Twenty-fifty general plan asset issues, etc. Are you approving that tonight or is this just no?
No not at all No It's just to let you guys know what we heard and then to have you say yeah I agree with that don't agree with that get your feedback in your
direction and the rest of the agenda are we going through the General plan or is that another session?
No where we're not doing the existing conditions and trends report Yeah We don't we don't have a meeting scheduled to review that
The general plan The other document that was
the big thick document was the the data document Yeah, we don't this this was planned in our scope to talk about
over this
time. Yeah Yeah, the smaller the engagement documents
so the only other Thing that I saw in this document is vision statement
yes that division and guiding principles That's what we end coaching next
or go into that next horse
please
wait okay cool
Awesome, right here. So the other part of this report is creating a vision and guiding principles for the general plan. It's an optional aspect of general plan. A lot of them included and it suggested in the guidelines to include them just because it allows for a conversation like this to get everybody on the same page. A vision is actually, it's a statement that's like you could imagine it as a goal for your whole general plan The very kind of aspirational big goal. And then the guiding principles are like smaller detailed goals for individual sections, right? You could think of it that way. They're currently just based on input so again it's our way of taking an input and synthesizing it and trying to start to begin the early, early stages of policy development.
In the guiding principles you'll see that when we get to them. So they really are meant to be like directional guides for the general plan. As I mentioned, the vision statement there's a definition here but really it should be the guiding thing that all your goals policies and programs line up with. And then again your principles are just the more detailed and they're organized by topic We drafted, based on the input that we received, we drafted two statements for you to start thinking about. They're a little different.
You'll see they're each about four sentences long. Some general plans have really long vision statements. We wanted to avoid that and try to be as concise as possible but you'll see we have to touch on a lot of topics. I will say that vision statements again are It's optional, you don't have to include it in your general plan but some cities and counties find it helpful.
So I'll read each of them and then we'll have a discussion about did one of these feel closer to correct? Number 1, in 2050 Lompoc will be a city that grows with its residents while maintaining its unique identity and small town feel. Residents themselves are a pillar of the community celebrating their diversity, friendliness and care towards others. The city, county and local businesses and industries work together to strengthen the greater region create long-lasting job opportunities and improve the lives of those in Lompoc.
The city's housing stock is balanced with job availability and provision of City services creating a self-sustaining and strong community Number two, in 2050 Lompoc will be a lively and engaging community for residents and visitors alike. Small businesses, local industries, educational institutions, local events and a beautiful downtown support the city's economy.
Lompoc will be a tourist destination that celebrates the space industry, wineries, agricultural products and other regional amenities. Targeted development in key areas supports ongoing growth of the city and regional workforce. Commercial corridors are lively and well-maintained incorporating uses that provide activities and social spaces. So having heard those, and I can go back to them.
We're hoping to have a discussion on okay how do you feel about those? How close did we get?
And just so that we respect Councilman Bridges comments, I'd like to pull up the other PowerPoint We did receive some suggestions, and so again this is the option one vision statement which you read. And we just broke it down into sentences so it was a little bit easier to see the different topic areas. Vision two same thing. This is how it was written and read to you.
This is Vision 3 which was provided by Councilmember Bridge and it picked up some of the statements initially but then provided four categories that were very Lompoc specific. We used the names of different areas like River Park and talked about the spaceport, or space base. And also recognizing Vandenberg Space Force Base and referenced the annexation. So the two previous vision statements I'm going to say they were aspirational but they were kind of generic Because they didn't provide some real specific things to move into the future with.
What I'd like to do right now is not focus on this as much, but go through the rest of your presentation on all of the other elements first and then we'll come back to this because I think some of the other elements that he's going to present in the next four slides are going to weave into some of these vision statements. So go ahead.
1:14 – 1:2219 turns
And thank you for providing comments, Council Member Bridge Okay, so then once you have an idea of a vision, you start to develop guiding principles. And these are not down to the policy level but they're not a big lofty goal either. It's just supposed to be really some guides for individual topics. So we've kind of just organized them by topic. They're not organized specifically by element But local growth, some of the stuff that we came up with based on what we heard. So supporting diverse housing options, encouraging redevelopment of commercial corridors and emphasizing effective mixed use development.
Promoting efficient use of infill sites and encouraging development at higher density. And then establishing, continuing with severe influence in annexation process to support the population growth that's coming.
Go back real fast. Do we have an effective mixed-use development currently right now? Repeat the
question.
Do we have an effective mixed-use development currently right now? Do we have one that's built out, a mixed use development or do we have one? I don't know of any. I know we had some people thinking about it, but one that's operating right now... Do we have? I mean, I've known historically in the past. I know people who planned for them and been working on it for years.
So why are we emphasizing something we don't even have? Does that make sense? And I know there is a trend out of the universities that mixed use is the way to go. I don't want to live above a bar. Why is that in there?
Just to respond, there's two ways of doing mixed use. One of them is stacked mixed use with the first floor being commercial office and then maybe the last two floors being residential. The other mixed use is that you have a commercial corner or some other things and you have units in the back that are separate but part of the overall development. And that's more the trend Because it does have that
separation. Where in Lompoc is that the trend?
I understand that, but I'm just saying if you're going to start hearing about mixed-use developments, that's more the...
I hear you. They've been trying to stick it down our throat that doesn't work. College towns they work. College kids think it's great to live above a bar. I get it. In Europe it does work. We just haven't seen it here. A hundred years ago worked in town but
There's about eight projects in Santa Maria that have the mixed-use component where it's the commercial on the front and then residential in the back. Now, the question is... I guess what
you're saying is that we're trying to do something that we're not doing and we're emphasizing.
Right. So this is
like a big... But we've been doing... MU came around 30 years ago, I remember, and we sat there without anything so
just... That's a good comment and we're listening.
As long as we're going to go bullet by bullet on these things, what does bullet one mean?
You can't just plan one type of housing. You have to think about, OK, who's going to live here? What's their income going to be and how will we have housing options for all those incomes? I would imagine you wouldn't want to build all gigantic single family homes when you have a bunch of single men and women working at the base that don't have families yet but need a house. Well what does
the word diverse mean in there? So there's a couple things that come to mind as we're going through this. One is Lompoc is I guess dense, it's hard to think of dense for a small city but pretty dense and some of these desires Kind of relate almost generically to all big cities. And that's kind of where my vision statement was also picking on is We have these statements, and I think that's what Jim is saying. Mixed use, what does that mean to Lompoc? And so one could say well our whole city is a mixed-use city because I can walk to Walmart.
Stonebridge is across the street because that's close to the concept you're talking about. So some of these terms they are like to use the work phrase, they're triggering. So there's that going on. The other thing that is worrisome to me, there's going to come a point where we start creating all these shall statements and I've been through this path before where when you guys approve that guiding principle So that means this has got to go in this statement. And so I'm not saying that's what you're doing, but that's why these things are triggering to us and that's why you've got all those ad hoc because we created all these shell statements from statements like that.
Some people might say diverse means low income. I've heard other people think that when they say that. This is just kind of general comment what you might be experiencing. Sure,
sure and word choice a variety of housing options might be better right in that case.
I'm trying to develop a tone that I think is going to continue through this whole thing from the vision statement down to the guiding principles down to those shall statements. We are, I say we let me just put it on me, I am tired of the general plan being used as a club to stop us from developing, from stopping us to be a vibrant city. And so when we see statements the trigger is that's what I think is going on and so I thought I'd share that.
Right and thank you for sharing that if I could just say I understand your frustration with that issue and that also this is just what we're hearing from the public and we need you to critique it right? We need this information so thank you Councilmember Peruzza.
1:23 – 1:288 turns
in big favor of us having such a varied amount of housing is because I do truly believe that there are a lot of people that are either renters or hoping to be first-time homebuyers, that their chance at upward mobility is severely limited if the only thing we're thinking about or the only thing that we think we're missing is houses that are completely out of reach. So this issue affects both the rental market obviously and the housing market itself When there is limited inventory, when we haven't been creative in our corridors to see like how might we actually stand up some sort of plan that engages multi-use that's reasonable, practical, doable. We can actually see that happen.
I think that creates a lot of upward mobility opportunities for people and it takes away some of that stress pressure that exists in the rental rates because of limited inventory as well. So again, to get more property tax from really big homes. I think that's great, but we do have to admit that there is a variety of incomes in this community. They're not all lazy people that just don't make enough money. A lot of these folks are hard-working people that will just never make the incomes necessary to even get a starter you know three bedroom one and a half bath home it's just completely out of reach so again us being creative as a city to look at some new options, or what are other cities doing? What's the trend and how might we incorporate that here just because we haven't done it in the past is not necessarily a reason why we can't imagine doing something a little different and more aspirational moving forward from my perspective.
I think a lot of people forget what we do have out there. It was 975 mobile home sites that are a lot of places, that's a starter home so there is a lot out there already Council Member Ball. There is a plethora of it. The concern I have is if we get into demands What is the push and what is the need to push And then why?
If I could say, I don't think redevelopment means redevelopment from commercial to housing. I think that's more commenting on the quality and condition of some of the buildings along the commercial corridor and those buildings needing to be redeveloped or reused
Because you have the mixed-use component behind that in that same phrase, it made me believe that you wanted to get rid of the commercial and put residential with it.
Oh That's what we heard from the public was that hey maybe we could emphasize mixed use development. It seems exciting
Yeah We should probably talk to some developers and get a better idea But then then the next thing is would you want to go? I mean I number one I don't support when you go and take a building and you Modified to the point that it becomes as we have look at the history and there's a bunch of them on H Street that Housing was upstairs, and they're empty commercial down below But the housing is empty so We end up with things that really don't white elephants So to say we don't need more white elements, but then the next thing is down here. I Don't support us to go max density There's a San Francisco Chronicle article that says as you take out the prison property, we're like the seventh most densely compact urban design in the country already.
Density I think when we see ramming and jamming density, we're not San Francisco. We don't need to be. That small town field everybody is talking about, that density goes against that so I think when we do things like that Maximum encourage. What does that mean? Incentives to get people to put, what are we now, 44 units to the acre? That's stacked. Do we have anything close to that density built currently?
I don't think we do. Do we have anything that dense?
Where?
Yeah it's pretty tight. I don't know. I don't see... I think we have to be cautious when we're stating statements, and now the next thing you are, we're putting four stories stacked next to this small town field. So that's a little convoluted on that. So I think we gotta be careful what you're wishing for in those. You'll lose your small town field and then we're not gonna have any jobs if we're not careful. Okay.
1:28 – 1:3411 turns
When you put out your survey, is there any way you can be more specific for a town? An example would be 25-50 questions. At the end of each one, you'd put important to me, somewhat important, not important, don't care. In other words, I wish the city had an ordinance keep yards up. I wish the city had an ordinance no SUVs on the street. I wish we had more bike paths. The city could. We designed a survey for this based on what we felt like we could get in there without overwhelming people with way too many questions, it's always
We will do a survey if the city felt that really was
And again as we, I mean this is a big, this is a 2050 plan. I agree with you there's a lot of instances where we as a city can do a lot of that polling and a lot of that, you know, we can do it internally. We can do that here so I think that's super helpful. I do want to maybe just give you a slightly different perspective in terms of, it says redevelopment of commercial corridors.
From my perspective, a lot our commercial corridor still maintains a lot blight still has a lot of sad used to be's. So from my perspective when we talk about jobs and opportunities in all this, if we're not aggressively thinking about either how to incentivize or push, or to motivate owners to improve their properties or potentially reimagine it into something that adds to the vibrancy of our city.
Then we're going to still be stuck in that not quite as proud-to-be from here because of the things that have not been fixed. We have a lot of commercial properties throughout H&Ocean. Some of them have a lot of pride and they look really nice And then we have some that just don't have any attention, doesn't appear that the owners care about anything happening. So I want us to be hesitant. I hope that we're not putting something towards you that were yeah let's just keep it as is. We need a lot of help. We need a lot of work.
I'm I hope that resonates. It is a private industry. No, if somebody is a private owner no one's going to just do something because there has to be a reason and motivation to do that and I think us thinking big as a city might open up that conversation.
Okay thank you.
Just curious, I don't know if you have ever done one of those or are you just dreaming about the motivation?
I appreciate you asking the question. We don't have to go that far, we can see places like Buellton, you can see places like San Luis Obispo and again if you just measured what they had 10 or 15 years ago versus what they have now you would say well something has obviously changed. They have three and four story things right up against the street where on the bottom there is commercial on the top there is now urban lofts and additional housing opportunities The people that are in there are not Section 8 people. They're folks that are hardworking in industries and tech built in the same way, I mean they're on the Avenue of Flags. That whole thing has been redeveloped and not only for businesses and residential opportunities dealing with density and arena numbers, they've actually engaged in more events because of the way that they thought from a bigger picture level on how to create a space within that city that literally, I can't hammer this enough, reimagines what used to be and thinks about how it might actually improve.
I'm not accusing anyone up here of not having an imagination, but if we're just defending and we're scared of change... Again, change is not going to happen unless it pencils out for someone. So again, I'd love for our city to have an imagination. And again, I think that fits within our goal as a council to be a business-friendly city where somebody might approach us with an idea and we're actually excited to help them follow through on that.
Thank you.
Back to what Mr. Ball had said regarding the housing, I understand you want housing for a variety of individuals but I feel like we are missing that moderate and above-moderate income level housing because like you said, you want upward mobility so those people that are in those entry level homes they need that stepping stone in order to get those first time home buyers or whoever
And I don't disagree with that. What I'm simply being very specific on is yes, we need that balance so there are additional opportunities but if we're only saying that's all that we need and no one else matters then we're missing a lot of this community that is not in a position to be upwardly mobile. They're not in the position to have a down payment for a $600,000 home they're just not So I hear where you're coming from, but my perspective is we do need to focus on the different sectors of our community. Different income levels because everyone needs a chance to find a place to live and if they're fortunate or they can work hard enough they absolutely need to move upward but we have to have inventory so for me it's not just $600,000 house or nothing there's many levels of that.
No I understand but like a lot of those A lot of the 600 levels, that's what we're missing here. And especially if we want those Space Force people here, right? That's the type of house they're looking for.
Yeah and I don't disagree with that. I would just say from the state's perspective, we're missing housing across the board.
I see.
1:34 – 1:3918 turns
Carry on.
Okay.
Or I'm going to go after the word fortunate. Need a nap?
So community character, so we have some here. So fostering a diverse caring and engaged community, ensuring that residents of all ages have access to educational and job opportunities activities and events Balance needed growth with the protection of Lompoc's small town feel and local identity. Ensure access to important aspects of the community's identity, such as existing and future parks, the theater, murals, and historic sites.
So does anybody have any sharp feelings about any of these? Do you disagree with any of them?
Councilmember Starbuck. Yeah, delete the balance needed growth.
Okay.
Put it
back. I do have a question though. There's one line in there that makes me a little curious and it I guess devils in the details that says such as existing and future parks can you talk to me is their plans I know this is a loaded thing. With growth comes opportunities to build out park space, but from what I understand we have a surplus of park land and space right now so again from my perspective ensuring access to our existing parks that are healthy and in good shape is just as important as building new parks that might never ever get to. Okay sure.
Yeah I support that 100%. We have a big problem Thank you.
Just to respond to that point, some of the projects we anticipate coming forward over the next 25 years will be cluster developments. They have their own private community center, their own dog park and other amenities. And this is part of talking about existing and future There are a number of amenities being parks, grasslands, walkways that can be part of the project. That would be maintained by an HOA.
So that was part of my question so in this context we're talking about where the city has influence and I get where you're coming from but in my mind I'm thinking of our publicly accessible parks when you're talking about private pocket parks Thank you very much.
So it does encompass all those options.
I'm sure it's fine as is, I just wanted to kind of clarify that nuance. Thank you. So
were we boring Mario? We weren't boring you would ya? Alright.
So I'd like to say two things one specifically against what you said and um...we have a development in town, a gated community with beautiful park. I don't know if that ensures Our Lompoc small town field because that's more isolationist. And so if you have a bunch of HOAs and they all have their own little parks, I don't know. The other kind of general as we go through these, if you can pick a bulleted item on there and it fits every city in this country I wonder if we're really, you know doing planning or are we just Filling a document so that and yeah. Yeah, just I'm not Criticizing. I'm just saying We got to kind of get to the brass nuts
We'll get there trust me. We will get there This is a reflection of the community right? The people we were speaking to were not they're not planners. I haven't started planning yet, right?
the Limiter up there in the middle their balance needed growth with the protection a Lompoc small-town feel and local identity I Think if you did the word protection anybody could say anything. You're doing you know protecting my small town, okay? so you balanced needed growth and Lompoc small town local identities um you put that restrictor in there somebody could violate you at any time Okay, anything you do You build one more home, you're affecting the small town community.
I
don't disagree. I'd say balance needed growth with the maintenance while maintaining Lompoc's small-town feel is a less aggressive term perhaps.
1:40 – 1:4512 turns
Embracing relationships with locally owned businesses and major industries to improve job access, generate tourism interest and support the needs of residents.
I think one of the
Items you're leaving out here in the center there, I mean we've got missing out on a lot of the recreational component that we have to this town. One thing I'm trying to do is drive it even more when nationwide I think it's $40 billion a year being spent on sports and recreation. Our ASO and hopefully soon a club soccer program will draw thousands and thousands of people to this town.
But our other sports activities bring a lot of people to town, our local football teams and such so I think that's where you were in the older demographics they forgot about the younger demographics when you're doing your surveys until like I say a lot of the people live in the town but don't work in the town or don't have a job so a lot of retired Okay. Anybody else?
I agree with you on the inclusion of something recreational, I feel like that's a big part of getting
outdoors and enjoying it. Yeah, the skate park is going to be fabulous we hope. We'll see. Yes sir. The recreational thing.
Okay.
Anybody else? You guys didn't know we were gonna be here having this much fun did ya? We burned out the city manager already too.
All right. On the topic of public facilities and public spaces, so continue to ensure that infrastructure needs are met in existing and future areas of the city by anticipating the impacts of future growth, planning for growth. Invest in public parks, recreational facilities, the library, downtown, and other public spaces to beautify the city and create a welcoming environment.
and expand community programs in public spaces to provide benefits to residents and increase use of the site.
Councilor Raul. I think that's all great, I think that's all pretty perfect as is.
I think one of the problems that we've done, and I don't know it might be conflicting these two thoughts so I'll say in generalities when we go and focus on one aspect or one area of the town we spent millions of dollars promoting. And it's actually, you know, unfortunately one of the areas that has the least economic driving going on. We've been stuck on that for a long time. We've actually, the city's bought land and bulldozed buildings down to put parking lots in thinking we're gonna stimulate it but when you look down in that area it's about 50% vacant so I think when we go invest in public parks, rec facilities, the library...I mean We start focusing on one thing. Why would we just focus on one part of the town? You know, I'm not trying to get these guys conflicted out by talking about downtown but I'm just so you're focusing on one part of the town why wouldn't we invest in our major corridors and we call it the major corridor.
I think that would be a better because let's take care of our major corridors Okay. Did I stay away from?
No, I think you can make that comment Mayor but if the Council is going to get into discussion about whether downtown Lompoc should be invested in then...
Okay, I just didn't want to conflict them by going too perennial. Right. I just feel that we should stay to the corridors again in that area we've spent millions with just a million dollar sidewalk with RDA funds and Thank you Thank you.
1:45 – 1:5219 turns
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. I have a question about development and ideas in the future. Am I allowed to comment on that without creating
an issue? Absolutely, you are allowed to continue that discussion but if you do so then I would recommend that Councilmember Starbuck step down and leave the room for that discussion. And if Councilmember Bridge has any financial interest Councilmember Starbucks should step down and leave the room. You shouldn't
talk about
it. How deep are
you going to go?
Well, again I don't mean to be awkward here but part of what I imagine is a vision where there is some investment and focus on downtown for specific reasons but I obviously don't want to create a conflict up here But at the same time, we're developing and giving feedback on a general plan. And an item about whether or not we would focus- It is
your right to talk about it. I'm just saying if you do then I would recommend that Council Member Starbuck leave the room for that
discussion. Well, I have a few things to say and I don't mean to make it awkward but whatever you feel is appropriate. Are you going to talk about it? I
am gonna talk about it. So I think Commissioner Cox, I think you have to go because you have some... Not anymore? No more money in downtown? Woo! Lucky. Alright. Good we can take the gloves off on this. He's eating more dinner!
Okay, he could probably hear me but...
You can go ahead now.
So here's my point. He
couldn't hear us sitting next to you, you're all right.
It's true. I have an opinion. Again, I've been to many different little cities around California and lucky enough to go see a few around the world too and something about the downtown in a lot of these areas is the place where you can revive a heartbeat and you can have a renaissance Look, if we take a measurement of where downtown Lompoc is right now it's better in some contexts than it was maybe a few years ago but it's still not a great economic driver. It's not pumping in a ton of revenue But I think that if we took into account that over the next few years, we're going to hopefully have the theater come into fruition. We're going to have that sort of attraction and that nightlife. Well, that might change the whole conversation about economic opportunities or entrepreneurs wanting to open new types of businesses that never would've made sense in the downtown because of the way it was all put together.
So, again we have done a lot of work over decades and decades up and down H Street and Ocean but in terms of some sort of hometown feel identity it is downtown for me. Again I appreciate you know Ross Dress For Less and Marshalls and everything else but all of those were kind of built to accommodate the growth that was at that time happening with the base for us to actually have more tourism to have people go like I hear what you're saying.
I'm just trying to make sure that we're not losing out because we're worried about one block. Downtown has become three blocks, but as far as economic numbers that come through, let's just say one of our major centers to the north, what are the economic drivers on that compared with all of downtown? Especially if Toyota is moving. What do we got? We keep focusing on the quaintness. We like to have hugs and all that.
But when we remember that economic, that we're talking about. Take one of our major stores because I don't want to say a name because of conflicts or whatever compared to all the four blocks of Old Town. What are they for the economic driver for this city?
Yeah, the north side of town is very built out and when I met with Retail Strategies today and real estate's getting Thank you. Yeah, not too much. I mean it's concentrated in the
north. So that's what I'm saying focus on all the corridors including that one too
but... We do get data we can share from HDL on how much we make on each different section of the city. It's available information.
If I may, I just want to push back a little bit. Again if we're taking a current measurement of what's pumping in the most money Let's go for it. I mean, there's obviously a bunch of stuff happening on the north side of town that's creating a lot of current revenue for us right now. But I'll put it this way. When we have an old town market, reason why it feels different, it feels special, it feels communal and it feels like a place where the community wants to get together and thrive and celebrate everyone else's stuff that's happening We do that in downtown. We probably wouldn't do that in the Walmart parking lot and have the same turnout or same feel, so I respect the whole corridor. You've already done impact fee adjustments. There's a lot of other incentives that we can be providing to help developers that see their vision for something on the rest of the corridor.
But downtown is our opportunity to create some sort of attraction. And if part of our goal is to increase tourism, just doing a lot of stuff on the whole corridor without some sort of focus to me is a very incremental change over time. I personally, and again it's very aspirational. I would love to see a downtown where in five or ten years there were people out during the daytime. There were two or three places to grab lunch. At dinnertime there was three or four places to grab dinner within walking distance. I think at the big picture level that creates the opportunity for an investor to come in and see that there is demand for certain types of mixed use housing downtown. It's going to be a stair-stepped approach, and unless we start or try or try to create that vision, we're never gonna get there.
So I personally just feel it's too general to just say fix the whole thing When that's not my point, my point is not how much money do we currently get from downtown but how vibrant might it be in the future increasing its contribution to the city.
1:53 – 1:5917 turns
These are
I understand. It's been there for quite some time, and it's sad to me that no one has come up with a vision to fit into that place because Lompoc has not had an aspiration to grow into something that's actually attractive. We could do a laundromat maybe or something? I hope that changes.
Is it hard to do the vision with three of the four main corridors are state highways? Do they have certain regulations that you can't do?
I have a question on the circulation element. Not related to the commercial uses along them?
CalTrans understands efficiency, that's what their main aspect is. When you go down by Sunset Chevrolet they allowed some enhancements in that corridor. We do get some other islands and such out there. Central Avenue, that is the main corridor. I just... understanding historically for 40 to 50 years we've dumped millions into Old Town and we just got like almost Zippo out of it
You know, pretty much just sidewalks and planters. Have you ever recommended to close a block like South 8th Street to 100 Block? Close it off to traffic?
That's not part of my scope. Yeah, it's a little bit larger.
I have a quick question in your asset section and I probably didn't pay close enough attention Is the downtown Lompoc area considered an asset?
Let me look up what folks were saying. It looks to me
like they're talking about investing in things
that you mentioned. The commercial corridors were mentioned, I'm sure at least a few people mentioned downtown but I don't have the full data with me.
To me it looked like that line that you're talking about there is talking about investing in assets and the conversation that's going on here around improving assets, it's rotating around income or revenue or something like that. So I'm just wondering if perhaps there is this spin where we consider downtown Lompoc an asset which I could wrap my head around that then it would be consistent and if we're thinking of going back to economic development instead we want to invest in economic development then perhaps the mayor's argument I'm just trying to package this in a way that maybe meets the goals of everybody.
If you go back historically where this downtown revitalization all came from, and former city manager and his connectivity with one of the largest property owners down there, it was short parking and that's how he ended up buying park. And I'll paraphrase a bunch of That's Right? Under the RDA funds, I think you were still around City Manager when we had a city employee with RDA funds was doing all the landscaping and sweeping. We still pick up the garbage for the private businesses down there correct?
And we still do that as well. So, we've massively subsidized that and I get it. I understand the character of it. There was a group that was going to come on, was it Shamrock or something they called it? They were gonna do it all! Disney was gonna come down and then the city reprogrammed RDA money and CDBG money elsewhere and BK'd that company that was gonna do... Disney was coming in to do this kind of game.
And we throwed that all upside down and then we have, I mean basically One and a half, two blocks left of it. So I'm just saying we'd start jumping into those small circles. We're in very small circles.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing in some ways. I know that there are many challenges to our downtown old buildings, a lot of work and so forth. I guess where I'm coming from and we can agree to disagree in some context but and I know how PASA got its money out of the earthquake and lots of that but We have examples around us within an hour and a half, two-hour drive where we have seen them have a conscious and specific focus on a vision that never existed yet about downtown. And when we go to those places as tourists, staycations, local folks, we don't go to – we can't wait to get to Albertsons in Paso Robles. It's never been about that. It has been about going to that place where there is some sort of heartbeat and identity to the city, so I'm not arguing.
And I understand what you're talking about subsidizing but I'd also like for us to think about okay well maybe it's not our money but what are we doing in this plan to incentivize folks that do have money to actually come in and see that we're open and we're creative to imagining something that doesn't exist yet? So again there is no argument, I'm just saying I feel like we won't turn the corner for being attractive or tourism until we have a downtown That has an identity and it buzzes. And until that happens, they're going to go to the mission. Sure. Council Member Bridge?
Perhaps if we took the word invest and changed it into something like support. Uh-huh. Perhaps if we took the word invest and changed it into... Support. ...support. Something along that line. I'm totally fine with that.
Okay. There you
go.
1:59 – 2:0510 turns
I would like to address the first bullet point.
I just want to make a couple of comments. One, I think it insinuates that we are already ensuring the infrastructure needs are met and existing in future growth. I think changing, if you want to change the verbiage or refocus on just ensuring that infrastructure needs attractive for people to visit short-term and live long term, the basics have to be met. The utilities, the water, the electricity making sure that if we're going to try and bring in that medium to upper level housing that's gonna need you know an EV charger do we have the transformer capacity to reach that? And I don't know, I'm not speaking for I'm not sure if we do.
So maybe just changing, continue makes it seem like we're already battening out of the park in that and Thank you. One of the things that the utility department has done and made sure they have done is we were able to supply
We have the ability to make 10 million gallons of water a day. We're doing like three and a half million, so we have a lot of that. We're at 60% capacity on our wastewater plant. Our landfill is another story. I mean, we've got throwing on but looking at other things. So as far as those main infrastructure, we have anticipated 25 years ago for this growth that didn't happen.
There's been a lot of planning and anticipation. It might be a little bit high on the police and fire, but that is something that has been in long discussions for awhile because the town hasn't grown at all in 26 years. I would say continue because it is one of the things that is locked in and we are doing a significant amount of that. A lot of people aren't aware of where we sit in anticipated growth.
We have waited for it So we're ready. Council
Member Bridge? I think we're off downtown now, so we can bring Council Member Starbuck
back in. He went outside! Dirk,
they're saying you can come back in. He
was looking for Dean. He went looking for Dean. Welcome back. I'm sorry, we forgot you. We're done with Old Town.
It's yours. That's the last one, yeah.
I think Commissioner Hurd made a good point on that. He put that back up because we have one major infrastructure that does need attention, and that's streets. And so while I'll give you my hats off to what the previous councils did on utilities, but we do need to ensure that the infrastructure needs are met And we tried to get the vote passed on streets, but we failed. So we still have that sore thumb and I certainly would say that's part of our infrastructure.
So I want to thank Ryan for his work and the efforts that we have. The council had some good suggestions as well as the planning commission in regards to continuing to do some outreach efforts, and the idea of using the utility bill and that kind of stuff, I think will talk with staff about attempting to maybe do one more round and see what other input we can get.
We've gone through the different elements. All of you to provide any written comments or any other thoughts that you have. This is an iterative process, it is draft information right now. We are evolving it particularly after tonight's comments and the last step was to refresh your memory on the vision statements that we talked about earlier. There were the two that were, I'm going to say generic but set the ground rules for housing, for jobs, for the community. And then Commissioner Bridges vision statement expanded on that by very much focusing in on some of the assets and locations and amenities within the city.
It's getting late. I don't know if we dive into those tonight or if you want to think about them the next time we bring it forward, we can zero in on some policy and vision statements that I think would be appropriate to continue forward as part of the general plan update.
2:05 – 2:1312 turns
Maybe even exaggerate a little bit on the specificity of the vision statement. I think the vision statements that was developed are great vision statements and I think you could put them in every city in the United States and they'd all go, oh that's our vision! I don't think that's a vision for Lompoc. I don't think it's unique enough in not recognizing who we are and what we're trying to do, and there were pieces of it like the city housing stock is balanced with job availability Well, I don't know what that means. Does that mean right now we're out of... Because we're providing a lot of housing for other people than the city but I certainly don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. I mean we'd like to have more and we'd like to have middle class but I don't know that we're ever going to have a balance of our housing and our jobs.
That would be very surprising to me if Lompoc had enough jobs I think it's 10,000 people that are leaving the city every day or 7,000 or whatever it is. That's not going to happen by 2050. So they felt like feel-good vision statements. And so my whole suggestion really was to point out, can we get it so it's unique to Lompoc? So I know what the vision for Lompoc is.
And I did maybe go a little bit to the right. But I think those were all reasonable visions for us in the next 20 or 30 years. But they may be too specific, maybe they belong in the guiding principles. So I'm fine with you taking it back and we can all come back another time. I'm not going to have hurt feelings
or anything. Let me say Vision State but number one definitely doesn't happen in the middle there that the city, county and local businesses and industries work together strengthen the greater region. We know what the county thinks about us. We know that's not happening so anyhow. Council Member Ball?
Yeah, just a reminder obviously it's a vision statement. It's forward-looking and I think there are dangers in both areas and I actually don't disagree with having some uniqueness or specificity to it. I think personally speaking I would be cautious to and again for example the pale blue dot inclusion like that is at this moment even though there is something that's happened in the last six seven years it's still at a very speculative I'd hate for, you mentioned the feel good part. Well, I also don't want to have something where in a few years we just have the feel bad part in the vision statement because we all realize oh that thing that we were very specific about unfortunately isn't going to move forward so again maybe finding the balance where there is a little bit of specificity to Lompoc it captures a little bit of its uniqueness and charm in some way but it's a little bit cautious on Assuming that certain projects will happen.
I will point out, we didn't call it out by name but we did have voter approval
saying go do it.
So that's our community's vision.
No absolutely and you know I supported that. Where I'm coming from is there's not a lot of control left at the city level. It is up to private industry raising crazy amount of funds for that to even come to fruition so again I'd be hesitant to say You know, this is our vision statement. We may find out in a year that it's just not viable. Two years it's just not viable so being careful I think is important but I agree on a little bit of that.
Great. This was very productive and we'll listen to public comment.
Yeah public
comment.
Don't run away we might have some more.
All right, I'm going to do my best to make this quick because my phone is literally at 1%. All right, so I wanted to start by thanking you guys for doing this very detail. Oh, I guess I should introduce myself. Commissioner Alexis Otero with the Parks and Recreation Department. I want to thank you guys for all the hard work that you've done. This was super detailed and I for one looking at this even if it's not all attainable it's still very exciting to look at.
Regarding the turnout situation, the sample size for the surveys is really small. I would of course want you to talk to Hannah who is the Parks and Recreation Manager but I'm sure that at parks and rec events if you wanted to have those surveys available I think that would be a great way to connect with the community. Additionally, one thing I would have loved to see regarding Lompoc's vision for the future is tent camping at River Park. I've been talking to a lot of people in the city and a lot of people are very dissatisfied currently with The lack of tent camping. They renovated it so now it's RV only and most of our community is either poor or working class.
Not a lot of people can afford RVs. Plus there's a huge need for tent camping in the county, so I think it would be a great money-making opportunity for the city to take that empty lot as you're first coming into River Park. We can take that and make it tent camping and I think the city would see great revenue from that. But that kind of goes into my main point here is that the majority of Lompoc is low income. Most folks who rent in this city don't have money to own because 50, 60, 65% of their income goes to just their rent. That's not even the rest of their bills, just their rent.
Um, and you know the fact of the matter is here in Lompoc the myth of the starter home is gone. My home I guess you could consider a starter home and it was built 70 years ago and I can't afford to buy it It's not fair to the working class to foot the bill for these things. It's not appropriate to shake down the average citizen. It should be on the capital class, those who own the levers of power and capital in this city, to pay for these things. And frankly I think the only way this is going to be done is through regulation because like Councilman Ball said private owners and private business will literally let their properties rot if nobody holds them accountable.
Being a bedroom community is what's killing us and we're not going to do better until we have jobs here.
2:13 – 2:192 turns
Gonzales, resident of Lompoc. I like to look at things especially the glass half full so we know we have a labor force here that's an asset because 10,000 people are leaving every day to work other places We know we have available real estate, both land and commercial. So we have vacant commercial and we still have housing sites according to our ARENA calculations in the maps and the sites that we did.
We can have all of the plans in the world but if they are too restrictive and not economically feasible, nothing will go forward. I own a property at one point. I had acquired a local bar. I had a special event for the youth, 299 people for four hours straight. I had to use a clicker to keep for fire access. Fire marshal came in wanted to close me down for ADA accessibility because it was a change of ownership and nobody ever came to me I had KCOI live broadcast six hours out of my business, but I was told I didn't have an art exhibit permit and I didn't have the appropriate access. That's the type of policy that'll kill this plan.
You have to have a more open flexible. So rather than specify like mixed use maybe you should have an overlay of adaptive reuse in the zoning code that lets you go to any area and be able to adaptively reuse a property. If I have to do an ADA bathroom, $50,000-$60,000. If I have to do a roof, $40,000 It's not that I don't want to bring the building up it's not that i don't want to have a tenant but it's just not economically feasible to do so So that goes again where incentives you need incentivize the developers, you need to incentivize the building owners, you need to incentivize for whatever it is that you want if you want of the city.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Maria Genig. I'm a resident of Lompoc. I am also a real estate broker here in town. After listening to the presentation and among realtors we have this conversation all the time. How do we sell Lompoc? What's lacking in Lompoc? In the past you know talk about this space force how can we work closely with them? How about changing our flowers more into a space theme and even incentivize some businesses to have space souvenirs, that kind of thing.
About how do you get feedback for this type of research that you're doing? Contact realtors. We have a broad amount. We know why sellers are leaving. We know why people are coming into our community, what attracts our community and why people want to leave our community. So that would be a good resource to reach out to the local realtors and find out what's working in our community... What they're here through your eyes and ears.
Another thing that I've been very concerned about and for disclosure purposes, I'm also the chair of the Public Safety Commission I have this, I've been looking at this post by the Lompoc Fire Association and I talked to many people that have come up to me. They are putting fear into our community now they're saying that R1 Paramedic trucks not available, it's putting our community in danger. How does this relate to this? Why do people want to come to Lompoc? You think that people are going to want to come to Lompoc if they know that our fire department can't handle an emergency call?
So City Hall is the heartbeat of our community. We need to start, if we don't up ourselves, if we don't talk positively about our community... We know every community struggles out there with public safety, with crime but you don't see them announcing it and fearing Not until recently did I find out that Solvin, who you guys pointed out gets 1.5 million visitors a year? They only have one sheriff the whole time! I always wonder, God, I never see any officers out here. Well duh because they only have one.
So but you don't see Solvin announcing to the whole world that they only have one sheriff at a time. Do you think people will want to come to Solvin knowing that public safety may be an issue So I guess what I'm trying to say is, let's sell ourselves. Let's be more positive in order to get these goals, in order to attract more people, more businesses. We need to start within our house.
So we need to, your employers, your employees, need to be more positive.
2:19 – 2:2724 turns
Okay, we will close the public comment on that. Bring it back to Council. What did you need? Oh, internet! Anybody out there? I just want to call in and see if it works.
There's no public comment on Teams or via the phone.
Okay, bringing it back to council. You guys got anything else to add, delete or otherwise? I
would just like to say you guys are doing a great job and maintaining the schedule. You know what a nag I am about the schedule so thank you very much
Give you a preview of next coming attractions. Over the summer, we will be working on developing alternative build-out scenarios for the city. No project alternative, a higher alternative and where we grow. So that is intended to come back to the City Council in September. Right now we are parked for September 21st And in the meantime, I would guess the homework assignment is if you have any comments or any suggestions on any of the wording in the document please forward it onto us because we want to incorporate those into both the background report as well as the visioning document. And thank you very much for your time on this and thank you to Ryan.
Quick question. Is this the same consultant that was on this document? Right? So I've got a couple of questions on that one. I know you kind of thought you buried it, but maybe you can answer some stuff with me.
I think the information was collaborative from what is available in the community as well as SBCAG, LAFCO, state finance. There's a number of different sources of information and we tried to address as many of the points that you brought up in the original draft.
You did a good job. The main one that I asked about is the household income versus per capita income. Yeah, the complexity is because as we've seen density of households increase, we have a skewed number. The per capita income is a solid number because that's how much money per person and as people put more and more people in the house with income errors it skews it and actually doubles the compound annual growth rate if you look at the per capita versus the household. It looks like actually the people in Lompoc are doing so much better The households may be, but you're jamming more people in there with more incomes. So that was the one that I had that was...
Certainly, certainly. ACS data doesn't break it down by per capita, but we totally can. We'll just do a little back and forth with you to see who are we comparing it to and are we comparing total population? That kind of
thing. So look at the number the city manager uses on the back of the ACFR, the per capita income. Where did you pull that number from?
We subscribe to HDL and they provide us like a booklet for all the stats in the back of that book.
I just think it's a more real number because when you look at this one here, it looks like, oh wow, our percent growth in 10 years is 62%. But when you look at what really is happening in the per capita incomes, it's almost half that.
And to add to that data, if you go to those stats or the ACFR, I forgot what that acronym means, comprehensive financial statements. There'll be a star and it will tell where the data came from. It's either HDL sometimes it's DOF but we always tell where we got that data from.
That was my big concern when we start seeing things were not... And then just one last thing on the way out is that it's important to see that our agriculture employment is down 43%. From 330 to 187 as per your job growth aspect, because people keep trying to sell us on the ag aspect. And the truth and reality is we were just You know, I mean we got a lot of other people to worry about too. Council Member Ball you had a question for him?
Just not necessarily a question but maybe just a couple comments. First of all, I appreciate everyone being here for public comment. I think that's one of the most valuable ways for us to hear. I do have a couple of comments though. Mr. Gonzales, you mentioned about regulations and it really has to pencil out if anything's going to change 100% agreement so our commitment should be towards let's not just talk about it let's create scenarios and opportunities overlays whatever it takes to actually move the needle for a change and then with all respect just on the fire department comment I look I'm a communications and marketing background type of person there's nothing more valuable than Having a positive spin on things or really pushing the bright side of things.
That said, there's also nothing worse than hearing how great something is and how perfect something is and then getting there and realizing that under the surface things are not working as well as they should so I know this is a totally separate issue but with our fire department Again, I don't want them acting like everything's fine when we have the same service levels as we had in the 80s and we have four times the call volume. If we're serious about growing our city, we have to take full analysis of where these departments are and if we're all saying let's grow baby grow then are we making a plan that actually helps the most important parts of our city, which is public safety? Are we actually helping them achieve growth as well? And I know a lot of that will come from revenue and lots of those things.
But while I'd love for everyone to shout and cheerlead about how great Lompoc is there are sometimes issues that we have to take head on but I respectfully hear where you're coming from on that.
Thank you guys. We don't normally comment on public comment, but we definitely The city of Lompoc has for the last 25 years on average 6% a year increase in our fire department budget. So twice, more than twice the CPI so we have dug deep taking the budget for 2.3 million to over $9 million in 25 years. So the wealthy people of Lompoc are definitely working their butts off to take care of the firemen. And
if I may just I've heard you many times comment on public comments. I'm not sure about that standard.
Not very often do I do
it. Well, I don't either. I know it's silly season
so All right, thank you guys. Now we'll open up to the final oral communication. Do you guys have anything to say before you come? No, we already closed public comment.
I thought we were on public
comment. No, we finished that.
Oh
man. We'll have another one here in a minute so you can sit down and we'll get one. You had a seat right here. Okay. All right, you guys have anything else to say? Thank you guys for tolerating us and putting up with us and yeehaw as we cruise off to our last oral communications. We good? All right, last oral communications. Now you've got three minutes. Come on down.
2:27 – 2:346 turns
I apologize, Council, for not being able to be here tonight. I had family responsibilities and obviously we all understand what that means and family is important but I did want to give a thank you. Being on the Planning Commission and working with Lori, she's been incredible. Greg, they put up with a lot of pressure on creating kind of a draft follow process, which I thought was incredible compared to the last previous year. So I just again not having a chance to be here, I did want to extend a personal thank you to all the incredible hard work they've put in and bringing us to this point as we work on a document that extends us into the future Maybe longer than I'll be alive, I don't know. But thank you for the patience maybe more than anything and thank you guys for all your time.
Nick Gonzalez, resident of Lompoc. Yeah, I worked on our 28 general plan and this is a refresher. Very happy to see that the current staff and our current consultants are very receptive to the community. I've presented several things, they've been addressed and that's how you build a good plan but again I'd like to emphasize that the plan is only good if you have a way to execute it And so we build the plan, but if in the background in the zoning codes and our fee structures and our processes and procedures they don't support the plan, the plan will fail.
We've seen that somewhat in other items. And then get rid of all the limitations. I've gone into great detail to discuss in the past, and I've heard you reiterate it but I think it's still important to emphasize again. Restrictive items of shalls within the general plan are binding. And you get litigated by not performing those items, or you get prevented from doing something if they're in conflict with those items.
So eliminate them as much as you can and be as flexible as you can in the general plan. And then lastly I think our community is in transition. We're going from an agrarian community of agriculture to a technology community of space. It's inevitable, we see it. All you gotta do is drive to a hotel and see the foreign workers are guest workers right? The pay is so low in ag that's why ag's dropping in employment for our local people because people are not willing to go work out in the fields any longer and as a result we're having to outsource our labor to guest workers from Mexico.
That's the reality And that's part of our lower income. If you look at the Employment Development Department, ag-centric communities have the lowest per capita incomes and the highest poverty rates. I love ag. My family came during the Bracero Program And that's how we had a jumpstart in this community on part of my family. But things evolve and change, and I think we need to embrace the change of the expansion of Vandenberg Spares for Space because it's going to bring jobs and people that we've always talked about. How do we bring them in? Well they're knocking at the door.
Let's open it. Embrace it and get ready for the changes that come with it. Thank you.
Seeing nobody else. I saw her.
Hold on real
fast. So today was a hot day, 80 degrees. We're normally about 72 so we turned the heat up a little bit so you could acclimate. Thank you guys.
I do want to talk about the public safety issue. Let's not talk about the ugliness of it, but at the same time we have our public safety makes three to four times of what our average resident of Lompoc makes. Okay? So when you hear public safety say we don't make enough, we can retain firefighters, we can retain police officers. And they're making over $100,000. Some of them $200,000 or more due to overtime or whatever it is how it works with them.
And then your average person in Lompoc is making $30,000 and they want more and more money? How is that fair to our community? So having said that, then maybe we should look at... I remember when the fire department had the accelerator program Thank you. A good majority of our departments are volunteers. So when I read posts like this and when people approach me and say, are we that bad?
Yes, but can our community sustain adding more and more to the pay? And that's where the community is frustrated. Now going back to housing rents, I can tell you there are people right now buying houses. Now we're back and it's never changed. I mean, I remember I used to sell homes to the mom and the kids, the parents and the kids. Now we're having multigenerational.
So yes, a variety of housing will be useful. You know, triplexes, more duplexes, larger homes maybe for those to accommodate everybody and those big homes because that's what we keep hearing the Space Force people they don't want a 1200 square foot home they want the 25 to 3000 square foot home. That's what they're looking for. That's why they're going to Orchid. That is why they are going to Nipomo. That is why they are not staying in our community. So I hope that it's taken into account and a city council look after.
2:34 – 2:341 turns
All right. Anybody else? Going once, twice. All right we'll close oral communications bring back to the council for adjournment to 6 30 p.m july 21st 2026 and the planning commission will be Wednesday August 12th 2026 at