BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 August 4, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:01 – 0:089 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:51

Welcome to the regular meeting of Lompoc City Council, Tuesday August 4th 2026 630 PM. Madam Clerk please call roll.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:02

Council Member Ball?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04

Present.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:04

Council Member Bridge?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06

Present.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:06

Council Member Vega? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Dirk Starbuck? Present. Mayor James Mosby?

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:13

Present Please stand and join me in invocation by Pastor Nate Marsh

CommentM. Madam ClerkProposed · by introduction2:22

Let's pray. Lord God, you are the highest authority and the greatest power. You're the most just judge. Hear us as your favored creatures and your appointed stewards over creation. We thank you for your blessings, your care and provision. We thank you for a beautiful and temperate home. Thank you that Lompoc has a historical connection to you. Lord increase our alignment with you and your ways Roll in our hearts and resurrect our soul's connection by your mercy and forgiveness.

Guide those who keep order and fight chaos in our community, bless the police, fire, emergency, healthcare workers who guard life and law in our town. Protect them. Give them discernment to identify truth and lies. Give them wisdom on the best steps to take. when combating evil and thwarting those who take advantage of others. Lord, thank you for this council. It holds a heavy weight of responsibility. Empower each member. Give them wisdom to navigate the interests of this community.

Embolden them to demand fairness and not favoritism to the wealthy and powerful or to the needy or poor. Make them thirst for righteousness and require accountability in their dealings. Watch over their loved ones, their family. Bless them for their sacrifice of surrendering time for Lompoc's ordered governance. Lord prosper Lompoc. Help our businesses thrive.

Cleanse our streets. Direct its servants and volunteers and give pride to our neighborhoods. Help us encourage each other to be diligent in caring for our homes and celebrating our community's beauty. Finally Lord draw us to your perfect love Inspire us to be good and morally pure as we surrender to your grace in your perfect way. Reveal more of yourself so we have clear direction in serving you.

All of this is yours, all of us belong to you. Make us more like your children. Bless in your power and love. Amen.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role4:37

Please remain standing during the Pledge of Allegiance. Ready? Begin. City manager reports.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:23

Thank you, Mayor. I just wanted to take a chance to thank everybody who participated in the back-to-school backpack giveaway. This was brought about from our treasury and utility billing, and a lot of departments joined in. You still have a chance if you wanted to give some a backpack to your kid through August 6 by 5 p.m., and they'll be calling them people who received those backpacks directly on Friday, August 7th.

I also want to announce that the county is having a health fair. Families can go there to the Health Center at 301 North R Street tomorrow from 11-3 and they'll have a lot of offerings there along with physicals for sports, immunization and a variety of other resources. I also want to take a moment to update the council. We had something on the future agenda items for restrictive parking on 113 and 119 North A Street after the business owner realized that it would restrict the uses like food trucks, he wanted to pull that so we're going to take that off of the agenda items.

Council also requested an update on the municipal code review. In July, we started a project for recodification through a contractor called General Code. That was the first phase of the editorial and legal analysis phase in which General Code will review our muni code and compile it electronically and give it back to us in a workbook. That should be around October.

Once we get that, we'll have a chance And then we'll move into phase three. This responds to legal editorial and incorporate those responses into the code. General Code then will review the draft for consistency in proofreading, it'll come back to us, we'll have a chance of doing another edit. Once that's received from staff, we anticipate completing in October 27th they'll get that back and we will do the publication so... A little bit of a timeline, I can update you as things change or if we have updates to that.

I want to take a moment to thank Parks and Rec and the Fire Department for hosting this year's fire camp. They had 37 kids that went there. It was a three-day event. I want to thank the firefighters for their dedication in demonstrating fire safety throughout our community and teaching our local youth I just wanted to get an update on July 24th. We had the pinning ceremony for fire, we had a couple of people that were promoted, Louis Fierro became battalion chief, Trent Orden became captain, Jake Ochoa became captain and then we had four firefighters Mr. Gonzalez, McGee and Pino and Tello.

And that's all I have for tonight.

0:08 – 0:1518 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role8:24

I've got a couple of questions that have come up. Maybe you can fill us in what's going on and such? It appears now we have three recreation fields, parks that are behind the eight ball so to say with being irrigated and watering.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:47

I can give a real quick update. I know we've been hit with a lot of issues. Tell me what we got going on, what's going on with the lake as well? And you know, I might refer some that to Mr. Guerrero our community director but I know you and I were out today trying to figure out what's going on in River Bend Park. We also like you said there's a Beatty Park and River Park.

We're trying to do a lot of manual watering. We're doing a lot today trying to get the irrigation back up River Bend Park We have a lot of challenges, but we're going to do everything we can to get those fields ready for soccer. And I don't know Mario if you had anything to add to that? You're more than welcome.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed9:29

The lake at the river park, it is being filled. We did do some maintenance out there so we will fill it up to capacity and monitor as needed but we're excited to get it back in working order.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed9:47

We're trying to do everything you can to get those parks back up to snuff.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role9:51

Maybe you can keep us, keep the public informed. I know we've got about 10% of the city's population will be connected with River Bend Park when soccer opens up there and maybe with the PIO and stuff we can let the public know what's coming along. We're always concerned about economic development in advertising to promote this city and right now we've got a ways to go on that one so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed10:13

That's a much tougher part to do manual overrides because it's on a well system, so we've got the water truck out there. We're going to do some training for fire if we can get some water down that way. I guess you call it a cannon sprinkler that we're going to put on the reel and try and get that to be utilized or work on that. We've got it running today. It's a piece of equipment that was in the yard, so we're trying everything we can to get water in those fields, and we'll get them fertilized too soon after we get them off that fatigue disk. So we are working diligently on those. We're going to do our best.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role10:49

Thank you and I'll try to get the word out there too as well. Another quick question that I've come across recently and people have brought to my attention, and I mentioned it to you as well, The disposal of syringes and people are finding it very complicated. I went to CalRecycle, and within 25 miles they're not recognizing any facility. I did talk with the hospital. They said they would accept them but the gentleman I talked to went there and they wouldn't accept him.

Our street allegedly only accepts us if you're a patient so we have a lot of people out there who have syringed with insulin and other things that Maybe you could research in there and see what you can come up with that. With the help, again, of the PIO we can get some information out there but maybe there's some grants out there and we don't take them at our facility down here on V Street, correct?

Mr. Lutz said we don�t take them down there. It just seems like if people are selling them somebody should be taking them back.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed11:56

I don't have much to add, but I can sure look into that.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role11:59

I've had several calls on it and people kind of like, hey you're going to force people to throw them in garbage cans which we don't want either so... And one last thing that's coming up all the way around and that's the flock camera system that people are...I guess we've had a couple of them cut down

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed12:23

Yeah, I know a lot of people have misconceptions of how the FLOC system works. I think it's a great resource. I know maybe we can get some information out there on what we do with the data and how we utilize it and also how it helps recover stolen vehicles, a lot of them.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role12:41

And I know we have it, you have to go down inside the police policy and procedure manual to page 467 to find out what you've got there. And I think you answer a lot of people's questions. The police chief was in that policy and procedure of how it's not to be used?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed13:01

Correct. We're tomorrow we'll have a transparency page up specific to the LPR cameras that will give everybody the data and what we use it for how it's used. And complete transparency.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role13:15

Yeah, and if you get that maybe transferred over to the PIO can help assist with getting that out there, but maybe a quick presentation of those Those pages.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed13:27

Sure,

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role13:27

if you could do that as well would be good because I think you answered what a lot of people are giving me questions about your answering them there already so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed13:35

I think something else worth mentioning Kevin Mr. Chief Martin if you wanted to say something about where we're at with the Jones first responder

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed13:42

Sure, as the council is aware you approved us to go forward with a drone as first responder. We have currently installed the equipment on the roof of the building this last three days our pilots have been training with the company and finished their training today they'll be doing some additional training down south At the end of this week, and we will be live next Wednesday on all 911 calls for drone as first responder. And they only fly on the 9-1-1 calls or specific calls with approval of police management if it's a SWAT operation or if fire needs it for an accident scene or something like that then we'll approve those kind of things but it's really important that the public understands it's only 911 calls When that drone flies, the camera is at the horizon.

It is not looking down. The pilot doesn't even take it over until it arrives on scene. So we're excited to share. We actually had a call as they were training today of a suspicious woman with a piece of metal in her hand swinging it around and the drone pilots were close by. They got on scene. They found her. She tried to hide. The drone pilots walked the officers into where she was hiding at, and we were able to deal with that without any use of force and get it resolved. So this is what we are expecting to see as we move forward with this new program.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role15:12

And I think getting that information out there a lot of the public wants to hear not like what you're seeing it's going like Roseville if there's things going on in LA and things are boiling up and people are anticipating more than what's happening. Thank you.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:15 – 0:2026 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed15:42

Transparency page for the drone as first responders. So the public, you won't be able to see the video but you'll be able to see the call and the case number of the call was associated with in the flight path on a map that the drone took. And we'll do that within 24 hours of the call coming in.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:02

I had a couple quick questions just kind of following up on things that we're trying to fix in our parks. Again, I know there's things always break at the park, Beatty Park playground floor looks a little bit messed up. Are we waiting for parts or pieces or funding to fix some of the playground issues at Beatty Park?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:24

Yeah, we finally have a timeline from our contractor. August 14th is when they're planning on coming to resurface the damaged areas at Beatty and also they will do some patchwork it at Ryan for that there's a hole out there and then we are waiting on parts to fix the well We did fix the one swing at Beaty and there's one at Pioneer that will be fixed as soon as well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:52

Thank you for that. And then I just wanted to say thank you, city manager and our fire department. I don't think Mr. Stuffins is here but again some folks were concerned about fire hazard and some issues up above South Street in the railroad. And I was driving past the other day and I saw it looks like County Fire was out there doing a lot of mitigation for some of the brush.

Again that's right on the edge and it's a high fire danger. So I just want to say thank you for working on that and for listening to the community as they were pretty stressed about that.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed17:21

Thank you Mr. Mayor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed17:43

I'd like to piggyback on the flock issue. When we get the reports, I keep hearing that it's a great asset for vehicle recovery and so if we could see some statistics on that to understand that, I think that would be a nice addition. And I wanted to thank you for the update on the schedule. Perhaps we could get that in our box or email?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed18:08

Yeah, we can do that, no problem. Okay, thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:14

Not tonight, but maybe in one of the upcoming sessions perhaps we could hear about the hiring and recruiting. I know that's got some critical positions that we need to get filled so... Last session we talked about an SB CAG letter going out. Did that letter go out?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed18:36

Craig is that your letter?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed18:41

I think that was a planning division item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:44

Maybe next session we could hear whether that went out or not?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:51

You're talking about the letter about the regional growth forecast?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:54

Yes, we were going to send out kind of a protest and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:58

request

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:59

for models.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:00

That is drafted but it hasn't been sent yet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed19:03

Okay. And then the last item was we got the response from SB CAG on the airport and it's been in review for a few months now, maybe we could hear something back on that as well. Okay

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role19:21

thank you. Speaking of letters did you guys get together to get that letter out to the railroad? On O and Laurel?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:31

That hasn't been sent out yet either, but...

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role19:33

Guys are killing me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:36

It's going to be a long

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role19:36

process. How much trouble would we get in if that hole just miraculously got patched?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:42

Well that's a good question.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role19:43

What's it saying? I mean... The railroad moves very... If somebody went out there and patched that hole how much trouble right? Maybe they'd get a hold of you then!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:55

The railroad moves very very slowly

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role19:57

Help me out with that one if you guys can. I know there's still people very upset about that one. Just one final thing, I know I'm carrying on a bunch but two major, major responses from people from the urban campers in the riverbed and very concerned. The dogs not feeling safe walking there with their family down on the bike path and stuff. And I know it's a perpetual I know people living there are Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈30s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:21 – 0:2810 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed21:03

Yeah, I think we're going to go out and do a task force. I think they went out yesterday. They didn't do tonight because they're preparing for the national night out but I know they're gonna go out tomorrow as well and if you council would like I could Go have some drone footage shot and see what it looks like And but we've done a lot of cleanup. We spent probably ten twenty thousand and notified people that need to move along and yeah, it's It's reoccurring, but we're trying to stay on top of it Councilman

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:34

I'm kind of piggybacking on that, just curious because again the riverbed has been an issue for many many years. It will continue to like you said perpetually it seems to be an issue. I understand there was an MOU being discussed between the county and our police department on maybe sharing some of their responsibility. Again from my understanding we're doing pretty good with staffing but it's still a challenge You know, get one task force always out there kind of keeping an eye on things. Are we moving forward with the county? Are we trying to build that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:04

team or how's that working? I had a discussion with Mr. Amos who is the community service director and we've been working with them in trying to get an agreement with the sheriffs. I know me and Chief Martin have been talking as well. We've been going out together and working on encampment resolutions and they've been doing it as much as we have On the cleanup side, so yeah we still haven't done a formal memorandum but we are still in discussions and we're still working together.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:35

I definitely love to hear about some sort of follow-up in the next few months on that. I do think that is critical because I mean with a couple of injuries or a couple of things Don't work out for us. We're going to have to pull back from the riverbed and it will go back to the way that it was, worst case. So again I'd love to hear that there's a strategic plan that's sustainable for dealing with that long term.

Thank you.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role23:00

Very good thank you City Manager. I know we hit with either bunch of questions and it's recorded so you can catch it again later right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:07

That's what I'm here for.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role23:08

Yes sir appreciate you All right, we'll open up to public comment on consent calendar. Maximum of three minutes. I'll read it into the record. We have number one's approval ratification expenditures for payroll at $2.156 million and a voucher registered June 29th 2026. through July 3rd, 2026 at 1.37 million and a voucher register of July 6th through 10th, 2026 4.135. What did we buy then? We bought some good stuff.

Number two is adoption of ordinance number 1748, princeties 26 in Minneapolis-Lompoc Municipal Code chapter 1312 cross connections to reflect newly adopted state regulations and standards outlined in the State Water Resource Control Board's Cross Connection Policy Handbook. And number three is award $238,000. Direct the city manager to execute construction contract Long-awaited project for a lot of people. Number four is award the contract purchase order in amount of $449,000 to Hacker Equipment for the purchase of a solid waste division replacement sweeper. Number five's award contract purchase order in amount of $437,000 Inland Kinworth Incorporated for the purchase of a street maintenance division replacement sweeper truck and adoption resolution number 6839 parentheses 26 approving supplemental procedures on budget adjustments And almost there, almost there.

We're actually there? Okay public comments go ahead.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed24:55

Good job on the stage about time but the main thing was why do two different street sweepers cost difference? There's $12,000 difference between the two. Why don't we just buy from the cheaper one, two of them? Just a question. Trying to save money everywhere as we got one that's $449,000. The other one is $437,000, $12,000 difference for the same vehicle. This does the same purpose.

It sweeps a road with some water. Just curious. Thank you.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role25:25

Maybe one has a better turbo. I don't know. We'll find out. Anybody else? Public comment on consent calendar.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed25:36

Good evening. My name is Rene and I serve as the lead organizer with 805 UndocuFund. Recently, I heard a parent tell their child study so you don't end up like me. That sentence has stayed with me. It reminded me of so many immigrant parents in our community who left behind their homes, their families, their language and everything they knew Not because it was easy, but because they believed their children deserved a better future. They sacrificed everything with hope that their kids would grow up in a community where government worked for the people not for special interests or political agendas.

Because of my role with 805 UndocuFund I have the privilege of speaking every week with business owners, workers, parents, seniors and families from every part of Lompoc. Despite coming from a different background, I continue to hear the same message. People feel like this city no longer works for them. They ask why our roads continue to deteriorate. They ask why beautification projects seem limited.

They ask why our unhoused neighbors continue to struggle while the burden of helping them falls almost entirely on non-profit organizations and volunteers. They don't see the comprehensive strategy that addresses mental health, physical health, addiction, job readiness or housing stability. Too often what they see are efforts to move people from one place to another instead of helping them rebuild their lives.

People are losing confidence because they don't see results. I also expect leaders to hold themselves to the same standards Except from everyone else, when residents receive citations for unkept properties while prominent properties remain neglected it creates the perception of a double standard. Whether intended or not that perception damaged public trust.

Trust is the foundation of good government. That is why transparency and accountability matter. Community participation cannot be treated as an afterthought. Residents deserve to be heard before decisions are made, not after. They deserve a city hall that welcomes difficult conversations, values public input, and demonstrates that every neighborhood matters.

Our immigrant families came here believing that government could be responsive to its people. Every family in Lompoc deserves that same belief today. I encourage the City Council to commit itself to transparency, accountability and meaningful community engagement. Listen to the people who elect you, work alongside organizers already serving this community. Invest in solutions that improve the quality of life for everyone not just a select few because at the end of the day this isn't about politics it's about whether the people of Lompoc can once again believe their city is working for them thank you.

0:28 – 0:4121 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role28:42

Okay again this is about public comment on consent calendar There will be general oral communications after this is public comment on the consent calendar. So that's items one through five.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed28:58

And it is still three minutes, so those are valid comments that came before me although to hear those at the county spending millions and millions of dollars addressing the mental health issues And the homeless issues in our community. So, that's where it needs to be focused. They're the ones with the money.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role29:33

Simonyo, anybody else? We have everybody on Teams, phones or whatever?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed29:38

There is no public comment via Teams.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role29:42

Seeing nobody else rise, we'll close public comment on consent calendar. Bring it back to council for a motion maybe a quick answer to the question I know one is of the street sweepers being purchased by Solid Waste and ones being purchased by Streets so why does Solid Waste cost more money? Anybody know? Different manufacturer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed30:10

They are different manufacturers and streets has a slightly different need. So I'm not sure why that one's slightly less, but to equip the same street sweeper if you look at their staff report, that one is about it's almost $500,000 for this same brand to do streets needs.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role30:33

Okay? Anybody, Council Member Ridge? Council Member Bridge wants to pull item number four. Anybody

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed30:44

else with a motion?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role30:47

Comments, questions? Council Member Vega?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed30:49

I'd like to make a motion that we accept consent calendar minus item four. It's been moved by Council

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role30:56

Member Vega and seconded by Council Member Ball. Let's go ahead and vote. It barely passes 5-0. Drumroll please. Staff presentation. Presentation from Parks and Rec staff regarding River Bend Park soccer field restoration development and direction and input from Council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed31:32

Good evening Mayor, Council. Tonight we're excited to present a presentation on River Bend Park Soccer Field and Restoration Development. This was a council request, a double council request from the Mayor Mosby and Council Member Bridge. Items of discussion tonight. The first one would be riverbend park phase 3 which is located on the current agriculture field and rehabilitation of existing soccer fields that are currently on the other side of the street. And just an overview of our current parks and recreation facility use policies for Pleasure of the Council. If we wanted to ask questions after each section, that's fine or if you want to wait until the very end.

Phase 3, we're going to present some conceptual options for that area. And an overview of our project goal. It would be to develop approximately 11 acres of soccer field facilities at River Bend, provide recreational infrastructure to support youth and adult athletic programs, and we'll evaluate the multiple development concepts with varying levels of improvement in cost. And just kind of four of the areas of the conceptuals. Some major highlights that kind of differ are big ticket items would be, the first item would be synthetic turf fields with lights and sod turf with lights Just a quick question, Mario. Does the 11 acres include our existing soccer fields or is 11 acres additional?

The land of the south. And then the first concept, the synthetic turf with lights. This project would cost approximately $19,975,000. So some key features would be again a synthetic turf soccer field with lights, concrete paths and bleachers, full asphalt parking lot, restroom concession stand similar to J&M Park, concrete walking paths and landscape The first two concepts are more of your soccer type of complexes which our fields are open fields. To give you an idea, this is what we're looking at here.

This would be the asphalt parking lot and here would I'm going to talk a little bit about what we're doing. We have the distinct concrete walking paths around each field with bleachers that would promote tournaments and bring people in for different levels of play. The next concept would be We would have lights instead of concrete. We would do DG paths and bleachers still, DG parking lot. Still have our restroom and concession but focus more on the DG aspect.

And then this kind of shows in the same way that the parking lot would be DG, be surrounded and still have three distinct areas out there that would be geared more for bleachers and promoting tournament play. Our next concept is kind of a 3 and a 3.5. The previous, I'll go back real quick. The project cost on this would be estimated at $14,425,000. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

And that would be a $7.9 million project, and if we went hydrocede it would be 7.1. And you can see here, there wouldn't be any distinct designation. It would kind of be like our current fields across the street and we'd have the parking lot all DG with the concrete handicap access and then we'd have a pad here where we could put porter potties as needed just like across the street.

And then there would still be a DG walking path around that For the public to be able to walk it as well as distinct, the mow line for the turf out there. And just an overall summary of what the concepts would consist of and these pricings do include a 25% contingency. And just kind of a couple of the highlights since we don't have it all broken down. A couple of the big ticket items between which project that you pick or potential, it would be 2.7 to 3.7 on the demolition and the grading. There would be some soil, the remediation. That kind of summarizes the phase 3 I've

not transcribed≈30s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role38:33

got a question, you mentioned remediation. What do you have to remediate for the soil?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed38:37

It depends what the soil comes back tested. The city of Santa Maria is building four fields, and they had to go down a certain level and get the soil turned and do some remediation of that. So we haven't gone that far yet in testing. We've done surveying of the land, but we haven't tested our soil yet if we're going to turn them into soccer fields.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role39:05

I just, out of curiosity over there they have oil other things. What would this place here is guys growing organic vegetables on it so what potential for remediation would be here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:18

It would just be what's in the soil. They're building their soccer field on ag land as well, so it would be that same consideration of getting that tested at the third party and then seeing what comes back. And if there's none, then we'd be able to move forward. If there is a certain level that we have to turn and grub it out, then we will address that

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role39:42

issue. I wonder maybe the guy who's growing vegetables needs some remediation. So another question for you. So that land is in the 100-year floodplain, so how do you propose putting structures

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:52

up? Structures on the lights or...

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role39:58

No, you got snack bars and permeable asphalt parking lots. How are you supposed to put that stuff up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:06

So currently this section here The EIR is out of the floodplain, so we can't have fixed structures in this section here? Let me

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role40:19

just first tell you that map that's filed in the EIR is not correct. The 100-year base flood elevation number comes all the way to the south side over there on those hills. We've seen it El Nino full of water, 69 full of water. So I commented before in the past that EIR map because they show The other thing is granted you have soccer but the original plan showed it was also softball. It's important that we get as much grass for Councilmember Vega.

not transcribed≈30s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:41 – 0:496 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed41:24

Mario, great presentation. What I'd like to know is where's the money for this and how do we get the money? So one of the concepts here is it's taken a long time to get anywhere here but I thank you for the presentation. But is there any structural plan to get the money whether it's $7 million or $14 million or is this just a presentation to make us Thank you.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed42:05

It's currently unfunded. So we are looking at grant possibilities that there is another grant coming out, but unfortunately this section doesn't qualify due to the income standards and then the acreage of the one grant that will be coming out. It's unfortunate that projects of this thing are so high We look at these 11 acres.

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed42:55

How do you make it more viable? You know, like you do it in stages as we've done many projects. I think what happens here in Lompoc, Lompoc's in great need of improvements, things to do, things to happen here within our lifetime and a lot of these projects are just conceptual so I think that we need to, as a council Thank you. find a funding source and stage any of these projects that we bring because as council, we have the power to actually take a vote to implement move these things forward. But as you can see look what happens with Ryan Park Stage. You know they have some people that are sponsoring it and tonight we're going to be voting on or we're voting on here for funding for that stage but look how long it's taken you know and I'm sure you're frustrated also So I think that we need to do a little better here because by the time you You talk about it for years, and then everybody's grown up and gone off and moved away.

I think we need to speed things up and not stop saying, we've got to wait for a grant, we've got to do this, let's find out where there is money and see what we can do in stages. If we can't do 11 acres, can we do five acres? Can we do six acres and stage it at least to get started? I'm kind of like the concept number two, I think Lompoc deserves A nice park with restrooms, not outhouses.

Councilmember Bolton.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈24s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed45:13

In many ways I agree funding is always a frustrating thing, but this helps us kind of build a vision of what could be and then start to ask those tough questions. Where might we get the money from? Who might step up? And I did like the idea of possibly phasing. I agree that the quality should matter and we should be proud of whatever we put up there. And I guess that leads to my first question about At the bigger picture level, if it was a really, really nice complex. You talked about importing people on the weekends, tournaments. Can you elaborate at all on what that could or might look like? Because I think part of it had... Again, it's hard to see but when I've got 1,000 people in town half of them staying in a hotel or eating or shopping, that has to have a positive impact as well But how do we pay for it and how should we consider the tournament potential or outsiders coming in?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed46:08

Yeah, so I would consider if the goal of council is to bring people in town and to be able to utilize that year-round, the synthetic turf option would be the best option for multiple reasons. We can play on it 52 weeks a year. Upkeep and maintenance obviously we're having problems in our parks currently with our level of staffing, our supply money etc., so to bring I'm going to start by saying that 11 acres of turf land would be a tough deal with our current inventory If we put in turf fields, again, We would have to shut down for maintenance periodically. We would have to have a little bit more supply money and stuff to be able to keep that level of turf from once it's in there, to a playable level so we can attract people.

12 or 13 acres across the street and it's unplayable. It's hard, so it's limited play. We try to recruit people to come in for tournaments but they don't want to come in because of the conditions of the field. So to put an investment in for that on turf on the other side To maintain what would be another. There's one thing to build it and there's another thing to keep it maintained so that's as council, that would be something to think about we can build it but how can we keep it at that level? So sure there would be an additional cost to that on a

not transcribed≈33s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:17

yearly basis. Thank you for that. And again, I just think it's worth asking...I know there are a lot of parameters, very specific parameters for grant funding and sometimes it's in relationship to how close that park might be in proximity to income levels within your community. I'd like to go back and if they say no or it's just impossible maybe so but obviously something of this quality, of this caliber Would benefit everyone in the community. Someone would drive from that side of town to go here to play, so it would be a benefit to the entire community considering that Lompoc is in some ways a hardworking lower income disadvantaged community I wonder if there's a new way to ask that question and just check the box Because this is a much more substantial thing than just the park around the corner.

This is, this is a big one for me. And then just out of curiosity and no one likes it because no one likes taxes or bonds or anything but I again to the point of having some sort of idea doesn't mean that we agree with it or we would push it but how might a bond work in this case. So that's something over time I'd like to learn about and see if that may come down to it, Lompoc will never have enough perhaps but maybe there is an investment opportunity but the community has to be behind that too so I just love to learn more and see if there are other communities that have used that.

Maybe there's case studies where I can look it up and see how nice that facility is and start to study the economic impact of that within those communities

0:49 – 0:5412 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed49:52

I think I heard you mention the size, but I didn't quite catch it. What is our existing park size?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed49:59

I believe across the street? Yes. I think it's about 15 to 16 acres. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed50:06

it's comparable in size to this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed50:09

Across the street is bigger. You can have about...I think it might be a little bit bigger than that. You can put full-size soccer fields across the street so it is a bigger property.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed50:21

As you were going through this, do you know what the cost of lights were? I saw it with lights without lights but I think you had bathrooms and stuff buried in that number $7 million. So do you have a feel for what lights cost

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed50:42

here on this one or across the street

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed50:44

either?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed50:45

I just got a new quote.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed51:02

That's perfect. You know Mario again and I'm going to address the council on this we have several things that economic development wise, we haven't capitalized on one of the biggest losses that we have here that we've never replaced is the beach. We've never been able to get past that barrier. And with that, that would have been an economic windfall for us. So at the very least we need to find out what we need to do. We're talking about maintenance for the parks so how can we build new parks if we can't even maintain them? So we need to shore up the boat here because at the very least you know with a public-private partnership we can get people to donate money. We've had Thompson Park. We've had other people who would actually go in And actually volunteer to bring their heavy equipment, all that and grade the place at least.

Put a bathroom out there at least and put some bleachers out there without spending an over amount of million dollars yes to have everything kind of done this way It's going to be a lot of money and we'll never find it. But if we put that word out there that we're looking for a public-private partnership, we have Explorer Lompoc who likes projects that brings heads in beds, you know it's going to bring people from out of town. If those soccer fields are in a way where out of town and there's already a softball or baseball field over there Thank you.

Thank you. Anyway, I thought I'd mention that okay because I know these concepts they're never going to get done. You know we already said we can't mow the grass, we can't water the grass. I mean come on you know what? We have to shore that boat up. We have to find out what the solutions are to making those happen if there is a solution because why have parks if we can't maintain them if they're gonna be ugly.

They're just not an economic draw so anyway just food for thought guys.

not transcribed≈35s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed53:28

And one aspect about having these conceptuals is that we are ready to go for when those grant opportunities do come along.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed53:37

And I thank you, Mario. I just know that we're waiting for grants and we're waiting for grants and I know that's your job and I know you have a path to getting it. We have to think outside the box because by the time we wait for community development to find a grant that falls into that box that says we can use it for bathrooms, we can use it for bleachers. You know basically we could get some equipment out there and I know those parks and that grass can be regraded again and they have this aeration process to flatten the ground out there, put some DG in the parking lot but we need restrooms out there you know? So I think we just need to look at it from a different angle. This conceptual view of things that we have are done so that we know we're never going So our job is to size it where we can make it happen, you know?

It's not always just taxes and increase everything. There's money out there that can be done. Lompoc needs that. Councillor Bridge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed54:37

I'm just curious, at the start of the presentation, I thought you had reconditioned existing park. Did we cut you off halfway through the presentation? This is the first section. OK. I'll stand down and wait. Thanks.

0:55 – 1:015 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed55:00

And so our next section would be the rehabilitation of our existing soccer fields. So currently this is the multipurpose fields here. And we do currently put them into four sections, A, B, C and D. Each section can have two full-size soccer fields on each section. And it's approximately 704,000 total square feet for those four sections. Thank you. Our strategy on this would be a phased approach.

It's a three-month process. We monitor the turf, drainage performance and maintenance needs and depending on that we would refine our approach based on those outcomes. During that time of the rehab, that section would be fenced and closed for a minimum of So the option one would be to relay existing turf, and this would be done in-house. We'd fill holes that level existing turf or bring it into soil with hydro seed or self-seeding bare areas, and we would sod extreme damaged areas.

And then we would repair and replace irrigation as needed. And these aren't in any specific recommendation order, they're just going through the different types of rehabilitation. Option two in-house would be hydro seed. We would remove and level that existing area, amend soil, repair any irrigation as needed, apply the hydro seed and rent any equipment as needed to complete that project. And that would be anywhere from $40,000 to $60,000.

Option three would be sod installation in-house, $130,000 to $150,000. Same type of option as option two but we would be putting sod instead of hydro seed. And then option four would be, this would be us going out to bid before RFP for a contractor to do the one section and city RFP proposal. And they would complete the project and we're anticipating 120 to 160 on those for that proposal.

Option five would be, again, contracted SOD city RFP proposal. And that would be from between $240,000 and $300,000 per section. And then optional would be the Gopher Wire installation And this option would only be for sod. We wouldn't be able to do it with hydro seed, we'd never be able to get it totally unexposed from the growth patterns and then again price varies based on if it's done in-house or contracted and it also depends on the level of stainless steel gauge that So that's kind of those options and just a comparative cost summary. The one thing I do want to say about the in-house option 1, 2 and 3 We are bringing on the new fields across the street. Our staff is very limited, so if we did pick anything in-house it would be a longer time frame because we can't pull all the staff off of all the other parks for two months or a month to get something done And if we took everybody off, then we'd have 13 other parks that would be in dire need of help.

So that's the downfall of trying to do a major renovation process in-house and then the other two areas for contract And that kind of summarizes my area on the rehab, and I can take questions on that. Or we can go through this real quick and then we can take questions on everything.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role59:52

What you want to do right now? Can we finish? How many more pages

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed59:55

do you have left? One. This is the final slide. And just wanted to kind of put out since we haven't talked about it in a while, our resolution for facility use policies for parks and recreation. Our priority list is the city of Lompoc sponsored or co-sponsored programs, community service clubs and organizations, nonprofit single purpose and interest groups, educational institutions, other government agencies, and then at the bottom would be the commercial or private activities.

And again, these are on a first come first serve basis. And these are for our facilities or our athletic fields. And that kind of ends the program and I'm happy to answer any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:46

Councilor Wood? Yeah just real quickly and again, I get it we don't have money in things but I am kind of thinking about maybe the goal is to get people from out to come into town and host tournaments From your, maybe the first question is are we getting anyone coming from out of town using our current underwhelming fields right now? Or is that just-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:01:07

Only the one time a year it did AYSO puts on a tournament in the first weekend and January. And some years they do a secondary one at the end of January or 1st of February but typically it's one or two tournaments a year for AYSO.

1:01 – 1:073 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:27

And I guess from my perspective, I'd just love you know kind of go big or go home. I'd love us to figure out is there a way whether it's private partnerships if there's a phased approach? I don't care but I think unless we think about how are we going to get people to come in that are excited to come and play here and want to come back If that's, that would be my personal goal. So I'd love to hear more about that potential and do you think if we upgraded the fields in their current condition on where they're at right now? Would that be enough to attract more tournaments or is it really about the lights having artificial turf etc., etc.? ?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:02:13

The current fields do not have lights, so it is a first come first service basis unless it's reserved. So currently during the week Section B, C and D are reserved for the volunteer youth-based organizations. During the fall at AYSO, We have one section A in the front that we designate for our department programs and if So we do not generate a lot of revenue at all on those fields since we don't have lights.

The only park in our system that we use currently for revenue generating is Ryan West. That park is used when we don't have adult softball, so after 7 o'clock that's used by the public and they come in and rent. When we renovated that field, it was a recommendation by the commission and then come to council I'm here to talk about the To be able to use more at river bend lights would be a plus because people could practice until 9 at night, 10 at night. So that would be a good step forward to get more play for the community.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈26s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:04:16

I happen to talk to somebody today and trying to work on a public-private partnership. I've talked to several other groups who are interested in doing this. The gentleman I talked to today said the irrigation, including installation, $100,000 to $150,000. That's $100,000 to $150,00 so significantly less than this. He's a licensed contractor. I myself put in two soccer fields I had for 10 years myself.

They cost me $1,700. That was the price of grass seed. The rest of it I did. So I think there's a way to do it but it's not going to cost millions. Millions and I believe just as the bicycle park next door was done and it didn't cost us millions. We had the Fallen Warriors Memorial that didn't cost us. We've had the dog park that costs... There's a lot of ways we can do this. I think the number one objective is to get Is much grass out there for youth and adults to be playing?

The reason why fields are built with grass is because it's cheap to plant. We have to start thinking like a farmer if we spent that much money planting a wheat field, we would not be eating bread. But we have to start thinking like a farmer. I talked to somebody about laser leveling it, grading it, contouring and putting together. We're in the tens of thousands of dollars not millions.

So I have talked to two big groups who actually said it'd be advantageous to put some money into do this as well so that there is a lot of interest out there but I don't believe I think it's ridiculous that we need to spend millions. Last night as I watched the youth over here at the four square church parking lot, they're paying on concrete. Granted there are some lights there. They didn't need the lights though but they're playing on concrete because there is no place for them to go and this is ridiculous and I think if we establish something my goal and objective to do This has been part of a concept for over 20 years.

And I think the people deserve it, and I believe that we can put this together and it's not going to cost millions. You can always add on these other things if you come up with the funds but the number one priority is get the people busy out there. Get them out there in the grass using the field. The land was acquired for this Let's put it to use. There are so many people in desperate need to get out there and recreate.

You get this one in, you can come back and then rehabilitate the other fields. I can show you how to plant it. We could disk it or seed it. You don't have to hydro seed, you don't have to wire. Every five to seven years you should be replanting them anyways so we can do it with the equipment. We can buy a couple of discs. I'll loan you mine. There's there's a lot of ways we could do it. We don't need to spend this kind of money. Do you have 20 million dollars falling out your pocket City Manager?

We don't. You have $20 million falling out of your pocket? That's a no-no, we don't. But I know that we can get it done. I know there are a lot of people out there who are willing to step up with the public private partnerships to get this done and maybe if the city could What we could do is what the direction of council is to get

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:08 – 1:1517 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:08:12

The first step would be to have the soil tested and get construction plans for that. I know we have public comment and a couple more questions.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:08:47

There are, as Council Member Vega says, there are ways to do it. We know how to get things done in Lompoc. I don't think we spent the millions on the field across the way. And if we think about the rehab aspect and work together just like the bike park got built, the Fallen Warriors Memorial, the dog park, a lot of that, we can do this. In my conversation with people they're ready to go to the next level so let me get Council Member Vega then I'll come back to Council Member Bridge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:09:11

You know Mario and I appreciate everything you're putting I think for the council, I think for us to move forward instead of presentation after presentation counting on these guys to find money. Why don't we designate that we need to find $300,000 whatever your guy's like is on those presentations and there may be more money and go look for a public partnership and then we can also There's also a maintenance issue we could invoke in something like that, okay? If the city can't do it, the people that are empowered and want to use these fields can also help us maintain them because it's for their benefit. So there's things I think we can do so if we could empower them and maybe ask the city for some seed money to get this thing started and at same token we earmark this money by giving direction to find the money otherwise it's just a presentation with no money.

You guys want to move something forward unless you have better ideas. Other than that, this is going to go nowhere if we don't ask for money and designate some money moving forward. I agree with him. I think we can do it locally. Does the city have numbers on the number of people that use our parks by park?

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:00

We don't have distinct counts. We know what the youth organization's enrollments are, and we can extrapolate from that since they do use it six days a week. Could you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:15

put the options back up on the rehabilitation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:20

On this part?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:20

The next one. Yeah, so are those cumulative Or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:29

these are per sections.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:31

There's six sections.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:34

Four

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:34

sections. So it would be to do the best we want to do is 800,000? Is that the number we're talking about?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:45

If we wanted to do all four sections, if we did contractor with sod, we would just probably times that by four and get a better deal.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:56

1,200 so then you'd want to go from wire if you spent all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:12:01

Well, there's options on Gopher Wire and there are various opinions. For Gopher Wire for soccer fields it takes a lot of Commitment from the youth organizations to be able to move around when they practice and play. If they stay in the same areas, then there's constant holes especially in soccer, and then you'll have exposed wire. The other negative on gopher wire is aeration of within the fields. One of the number one things of killing grass is compaction. And for us to be able to aerate with our aerator, it would damage the field. I just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:12:47

know I have been down in that park during soccer season and it's a steady stream of hundreds of people from 8 o'clock in the morning till 3 o'clock in the afternoon. I would probably be willing to bet a Coke that it's the highest use park we have in this city. The baseball guys Maybe they compete with it, but I mean we're talking about a lot of our local community uses those fields.

And you know, I'm still trying to figure out the budget. We couldn't do 50,000 for murals and last session we dropped 1.5 million on an overrun. Just boom! We got the money. So I think, you know, I like the large vision We should put together a plan and start committing some. Because you guys, when you have a problem, you seem to come up with the money. You know? Oh, our skate park, it's $1.5 million over. Well, we found a place.

Let's find some place for the money where people are really using this stuff. And it's sad when you go down there on a Saturday, you don't have a bathroom. Kids are tripping and breaking their ankles. It's just bad. So I don't want to be a negative Nancy. You did a great presentation and you're getting the...I don't mean to pick on you but I am telling you my perspective is this is an important element. We should find a way to do it It's sitting right next to a bike park that another foundation has put thousands of hours in and their kids, they come and they found a way. They found a way to make it happen.

And I just don't see why we can't find a way to make this happen.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:14:38

It's only taken 20 years just to get into this conversation so I got you. Council Member Bull.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:14:45

So I hear all those things, I always try to think really big but I just would bring it back. I'd love to find some middle ground like maybe a big one as well we can fix what You made a point. It's really sad you go there, there's no bathrooms. There's also no lights. We're not getting full functionality out of that space for the whole day, even just to serve people that live here within the community. So again, if there was a hybrid approach or we found a grant plus you found somebody you want to put together, I still think a goal should be to have a facility that you're proud of. If it's just a little bit better than it is right now and you guys are constantly chasing your tail and the quality of the field is based upon how much staffing you have Thank you.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:15 – 1:245 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:15:48

And I think one aspect on the budget process that's coming up is more funding for those type of supplies to be able to do it on an annual basis, as well as the youth organizations in town understanding then that we have to shut down sections of parks every year to rehab them. That's a problem and Lompoc We have a lot of park land on paper, but athletic fields for the youth and adults we are lacking. So for us to shut down Riverbend Park for March through May, we're putting the net spring program out so that there's really not a good time, but other cities that do it successfully have a lot more parkland so they can shut down periodically throughout the year I think we can really hit that more throughout the year.

On an annual basis, it's just the understanding from our youth organizations that we need to shut down certain sections per year.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:17:20

Real fast, when we had the light presentation a year plus ago I went out and talked to groups. I was hoping to get the school district involved and they have not even responded back so I tried to get something out of it. Nothing. Tried to get the county involved since we provide so much recreation for Mace Oaks, Mission Hills, Benard Village thought it'd be a good fair share and they gave a million after Santa Maria and sorry Lompoc nothing for you They collect the property tax from those people over there, but we're willing to help us with the recreation components. The casino did show interest in supporting us as a city manager. I was looking for a four-way split.

Figured everybody would win, win, win. I do have one other person that looks like maybe coming to the table that might help us with lights and maybe a three-way split. So I'm trying to find that way that people get more skin in the games. Getting back to your rehab aspect, one thing I'm thinking if you do this over here it gives you the three fields. Get these up and running then you can go back and start rehabbing on the other side and get things together. You most definitely wouldn't want to do it now because soccer season's starting right? But from from the time I would put a piece of equipment on the ground to the time it's playable Is about four to five months, depending on the time of the season. That's replanting the whole field.

So that that's what it takes to get that established. I mean, leveling and contouring in everything decomposing the existing planting it back irrigating it giving a time knowing it a couple times before they play so we can do this. I've just been waiting for this presentation so we can see that we can do, so we can go strategically. Like you say if we took out one third of what we have right now, we couldn't do that. The demand potential is too hard for us to do that. I went over there anticipating doing something. This stuff is pretty bad out there. It's got let go too far it's going to be really hard to rehab it back but...

See nobody else with questions? Let me bring into public comment and we'll bring it back Council, somebody open this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:19:42

So once again the city wants to build something that will not be able to upkeep for five or ten years. We have so many parks that need repair right across the street. I think that would be a solution. That is my neighborhood. That's where I walk my dog. Have you guys thought about noise? Have you guys sent out a letter to the neighbors up the hill about the noise that it's going to cause. I think it's gonna be beautiful noise, I love children's laughter, I think it's gonna be great but I don't know about the neighbors how they're gonna feel about that.

We have so many projects that need to be fixed. But yet you want to put something in that is not going to. And plus, who's in number six? That's what you put the community at, number six priority-wise on their list of who can use this new facility. How does that work? So you're making money off people's backs. Low income families, soccer is a staple in our immigrant community.

We just saw it with the World Cup. For the first time, it was here in the United States. We saw the passion. Let's spend the money where it needs to be spent. Be having what we already have, not spending where we don't have it, you say it all the time. So let's rehab what we have now so that youth can have something for the future. Let's put in bathrooms where we need them right now. Yes there is porta-potties there. There is concession stands on wheels there.

Let get real stuff in there, let's fix it. You know, we're not going to be the first city to have all these gophers. So figure it out.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:21:49

Real fast, the EIR for this is available online correct? Maybe we can make sure there's a link to the EIR. There is a 400-page EIR that talks about sound and everything for this project, so it has already been massively studied. So if we could make sure that there is a link to that... Can we do that? Emily? Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:22:19

Hello Carl Jones, citizen. I like that park down there. I do see a lot of activity down there during soccer season. I believe it needs some refurbishing. I don't think we need to have the barriers or the bleachers. Soccer, football season comes in they can go market up for football, flag football for the kids. Softball season comes in you go out there and market with the paint for softball so it's a multi-use field.

So my personal belief is put the gopher wire down plant the sod put the gopher wire down a little bit deeper than necessary so you can aerate and just make it a smooth field that kids can run on not to worry about the gophers coming up out of it all the time The GoPro wire. And like I said, I've been down there many times and it gets full down there. The parking area is definitely a need because you do see them coming up and parking in the neighborhoods and that probably will make the neighborhood matter more than anything else.

As far as lighting goes, just buy some movable lights. They have them. They've got battery power, they've got solar power, they've got generator power. If they wish to have them then we rent them out to them and set them up and we've got lights on a field. It's simplistic. I say make it nice but keep it simple. And that way it's usable for everybody but still clean and people want to use it. Thank you.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:24 – 1:3614 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:24:15

Karen Hauenstein, lifelong resident. So you talked about people who have skin in the game. Why don't we ask Surf Development Corporation if they want to work with us to get our fields renovated? After all, well, Joyce Harriton was here recently at some of the meetings I was kept out And she's the one who led us down the primrose path of not having owned home development all the way to Bailey Avenue so that we'd have a better tax base.

So, the beneficiaries of the Surf Development Corporation are really the only developers that have been developing housing in Lompoc for 15 years So why don't we go to them and ask them to partner with us? I think that'd be a good idea. I think they have skin in the game.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:25:25

Anybody else, public comment? Let me put something out there. Is it the way that we can keep this on the agenda as an item for discussion now that we've got a lot of data out there, that we can get more people involved with your presentation and we can keep things moving along? A lot of people are very interested in moving forward with this and maybe we can, we know what our funds are. We know what they aren't. We know the complexity of the issue but as more information comes forward, the gentleman I talked today about irrigation systems he wanted to see more of your presentation and tomorrow he would submit something to show Just ballparking, because we don't build soccer fields all the time.

And you're out there fishing and trying to get it. Of course, the people you're probably talking to they're going to make sure that number is pretty high. But let's put the feelers out. That's kind of what I'm asking for this and ask for it to move forward was to move forward. Was it 2003-4? The EIR was done on this? To move forward with this project And to see where we can go from there, I think we can see and will see a lot more information move forward.

You have a layout plan that's up there and we can see...I did talk with somebody at the Lompoc Valley Parks, Rec and Pool Foundation. I talked to a couple people from the old adult soccer league that have almost 1,000 people involved in that league that is now gone out of Lompoc. They were here for 25 years, ended up not having a safe place to play and left.

I mean there's a significant number of people that are excited about an opportunity to re-engage in our community and to put this back together so. A lot of what I've been asking for this to do is to do what you did here the presentation We have some direction to add on here, but I don't think there's any hurry to move forward with something. But let's see what the public brings back to us, brings to Mario.

Yeah, I think there's definitely a lot of opportunity out there to get this done which we need to get it done. Which would advance us like you said, we're short fields, you put this in then we can go rehab and work on the others. I was impressed when I called people, not one person I talked to said no, I'm not interested. How can I help? One guy with a laser level, another guy for disking, another guy with irrigation.

It wasn't like I'm trying to get claim to fame and do something. I'm not going to make any money off this. I am just trying to help the city do something for us. Let me get Council Member Vega then I'll go bridge the ball.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:28:40

I appreciate your motivation to get something done and move forward with the presentation, but I do disagree that there's no rush. I think every season that goes by is a lost opportunity for our people to have something to do here and for us to put Lompoc back on the map. So I think there is motivation for us to do something. I think I agree with Council Member Ball to a point that say if we don't shoot for something nice, we're never going to get nice. But I think in staging it like say for instance okay, I saw concept number two. Yeah, we don't like the money but we like the fact that it has restrooms and it has lights and everything so why don't we stage it back from the bottom up, say the $150,000 to $300,000 range that he gave us, the lower end but let's stage it with the goal being eventually You know it doesn't have to be what I am interested in, but the concept number two which means it would have sod bleachers lights.

And parking lot OK so why don't we look at it from that concept and how we can actually start this thing? is to actually earmark it and give them direction. This is what they're asking for. It's going to take us a while, but why don't we say hey guess what guys? We do want this but we are willing to stage it from this part done. Say $150,000, $200,000 or $300,000 for the public-private partnership and then work our way to that goal instead of the other way around where we get nothing.

So anyway that's kind of where I'm going Mayor.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:30:17

I think there's some misconcept because being in the floodplain, you're limited on what kind of parking lot you can put in. So putting an asphalt parking lot in a 100-year floodplain, you can't do it. You're limited on bleachers that need to be mobile and taken out. You're also limited on permanent structures. You can't put a permanent structure in the 100-year floodplain. That lands in the floodplain so you're doing permanent structure for snacks, you can do that.

The other part of it, my friend, I think that what we're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:30:54

doing is we're just delaying and allowing the city The option of saying we want something to happen, instead of saying we can't do it. We know floodplain... I'm tired of hearing about floodplain. The floodplain is there dude before it was the airport, the path and all that but I think all of us here, we know what we can do Mayor. I think all of you guys are intelligent and you know that we can push something forward in a way that can matter that doesn't have to go completely to a contractor We know that locally we can get a public-private partnership together. We can get some seed money and we can get some people to buy in on this because you can't tell me you can find $300,000 here without raising taxes. That's baloney. You guys know that too.

You know that we can find it. All we have to do is give direction. So it's just a matter of how bad you want the parks. I want the soccer people to become coming back, I want them here I want them competitive. I want them to be happy. I agree with Mr Bridges a lot of people that go down there and now there's a safety issue so we need to. They're waiting. They went to Santa Maria when they wanted to play in Lompoc. You have Lompoc people driving to Santa Maria and beyond because we can't utilize our own fields, and we're using the excuse that we don't have the maintenance here but with a public-private partnership and with you guys at the helm directing, you know that we can make that happen and we can get it maintained even if we have to allow other people to help the people that are involved that want to utilize those fields.

You know that because they do it with the baseball fields. They do it with George Meyer Field. Who grades that dirt out there when the baseball kids want to play? Who's out there making sure the fields are playable? It's the volunteers and the parents. So anyway, that's where I think we should go sir. Councilman Bridge.

not transcribed≈23s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:33:05

Well I agree 100%. We should move forward. I'm not sure if this is an oddball idea, but why don't we have the Parks and Recs Commission come back in two months with a plan? Having reached out to the non-profits, Lompoc Pool and Rec Foundation. I know they're pretty effective. They could talk to some of the industry in the area and come back in some timeline, six weeks, two months, whatever's reasonable.

Have them bring something back that will give us time to do our own outreach and share it with them. That would be my oddball idea.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:33:47

I think one of the things that needs to be done first is, first of all there's a tenant there so you're gonna have to reach out to the tenant. That's going to be your timeline because you have a tenant who's farming. So you have to figure out the movement forward with that. That's probably your unknown variable that's out there, which would give us plenty of time for the people who are already interested in doing that to present something to the city as well on a partnership.

I think that's the key. Let me get Council Member Bola and then I can come back to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:20

I'm a big dreamer. Maybe you say 300,000. I say well can we get to five? Well 500,000 will that get more people to actually want to stay here in town? Will it get more people to drive from Santa Maria over to compete in some special tournament that we have? So again I'm always going to push us to go a little bit further and be a little bit more uncomfortable with the big idea but look I think whatever we can do to improve it for our folks that's great. I'm all for it.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:35:04

One aspect I wanted to do was bring our building official, Dr. Michael Loeb, to kind of talk about just the bare minimum on the permit process for fields or parking. But

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:35:18

you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:35:18

know,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:35:18

Mario can I ask is this another delay process? Or what is it because you're wanting to build a snack bar? Because you want to do a soils

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:35:25

test, because what is this? Yeah. If we are going to do a private partnership kind of at least what we have to do as a permit process before we go out there and so Michael can kind of just give an overview.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:35:40

Turn it down, Mabel. Michael Lowe, Building and Safety Services Manager. In order for us to have some work out there we'll need to process permits anytime there's over 50 cubic yards of dirt being moved that requires a grading permit and of course any new structures require a building permit. The typical process is once plans are developed Internally, the city will do the reviews and prepare them for permit issuance whenever a contractor is ready to be hired. So for example with the recent skate park all of the review took place prior to it going out to bid so that way once the bid was awarded they could just come pick up the permit and go to work.

1:36 – 1:4122 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:36:32

Yes, please. Just just thinking out loud again we're all shooting for the same thing here but can you can someone clarify about and again I respect what you say about 100 year floodplain? Meanwhile, we want them to do something with McLaughlin but we're a little bit nervous about bathrooms in the floodplain. So is there a permit or who's in control? Is it a state thing so that the feds that say, oh, floodplain you absolutely cannot put a bathroom there? How should we think about that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:36:59

So floodplain regulation set by FEMA and so I'm not as familiar with those specific requirements around it. I'm not sure if Public Works has any comment on that.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:37:14

I think if you actually look in that book, you'll see a lot of the EIR, a lot of the data is still there. FEMA is like a slug. They don't change a lot of the stuff that's out there. That's why awhile back I asked for, made a request that we write a letter to potentially I was trying to get that letter out to see if we can But it doesn't mention a lot of it in that EIR already.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:38:04

Yeah, and I don't want to speak out of turn here. I have been a part of construction that has built within floodplains under special exceptions. I'm not sure what those are off the top of my head. We could look it up and bring it back to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:38:20

Well, I think that item is on the upcoming agenda for October.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:38:25

The request for a letter, yeah. But

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:38:27

FEMA can take years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:38:28

And I guess that's what I'm asking. We don't have to have the answers now and just hash it out for hours but again where might there be waivers? Where might there be exceptions if there are case studies of other cities that they said hey well mostly unlikely you can do this. If it's an absolute no, I love creativity who knows maybe the shoemash says well you can't build a structure but we'll rent or buy you a bathroom trailer. It's really nice and we'll pay to have it cleaned.

There's got to be a way to do it, but I'd also like to know the parameters of...I wouldn't like to come up with an idea. We're all excited about it and then we find out. It's just an absolute no. So again, just details for me.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:39:03

Thank you. I think you'll find out it's not only in the floodplain but it's probably in the floodway so...only worse than that is the flood channel so dealing with FEMA is quite a process. So let me try with something just as a first level of moving forward. I still have one more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:39:16

question. Yeah, go ahead. Look, I think we're overstating what we need here from what i'm listening to. Mario could you explain to me the renovations are in the existing park or it's on outlying land?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:39:33

There was two for the renovation of our current fields and then phase three would be We have an existing park that we could utilize right now without going

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:39:41

through the soil test and permit process, why are

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:39:59

Yeah, that's another option with...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:40:01

I mean that should be a big option because that's the way I was thinking. You know why don't we fix the park we have instead of going out into farmland? I get it but that's gonna be something that doesn't happen You know, there's no parking lot out in farmland unless you guys can clarify what we're doing. It's a piece of land

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:40:17

that the city acquired. It's being farmed right now but it's that land that's inside the elbow down there at McLaughlin. So the logic here is number one, we're short grass anyways So even if we didn't have it and we had everything else fixed, we still don't have enough grass for the kids to play and adults to play. Number one. Number two is this gives us the opportunity if you fix this field then you can take 30% to 40% of the other field out of play as you transition to get that one rehabilitated. If you did that right now, you'd even be shorter than you are right now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:40:52

But I just don't understand. Clarify with me Why we're doing it that way and we're not getting the existing park renovated right now. I understand you have something in the future, you want to expand because the city acquired it. I get it but it's also a delay. We're not helping.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:41:11

It's not a delay. You would take the existing field. No, it's not. The delay that this should have actually probably been done in January. It should have been rehabilitated in January when it was off-season but you're not off season now. You're in season right now. There's no money. You just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:41:28

said

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:41:28

there's no

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:41:29

money.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:41:30

No, there is money that can come aside for this, yes. What he said is that you can't use certain of the Prop 68 grant funds because those funds don't work there because of what the neighboring is in the per capita incomes and the neighbors but there's money for rehab that can be done on here but if you go rehab that field that's out to the existing field right now, you'll be out of play for four months

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:41:52

Thank you.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:42 – 1:4912 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:42:17

No, our AYS. So we have our local program that has

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:42:23

it. And I'm with you Jim, I get it. I'm just trying to understand the way We're going to a concept that needs more permits, more soils tests, more stuff. It's always the delay. We're already going through the Bailey Corridor expansion. We're already going through Bodger Homes. We'r ealready going through things that you guys are doing a lot of work and fighting for. You know it's like God do we always have to fight for everything?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:42:50

This one we shouldn't have to fight for, but I'm saying is I want it to happen. But as we're doing this one, we need to fix the other ones simultaneously. I've been waiting for this to come forward for quite a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:43:00

while.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:43:01

So that's why last council meeting I said this will come forward. Thank you.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:43:25

Look how long it's taken Ryan Park to stage. That's why I lost a little bit of... Yeah,

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:43:29

I feel you. So let me give some direction to move forward because it's going to take stages to do and the first movement I'm gonna ask for direction is that you have to come to conclusion with the existing tenant. No we already did it. So the direction is we move forward with the termination of the lease that's there. And do your initial soils that you have to do, and then We don't need to go through the RFP, RFQ process. But we can call it the non-formal RFQ process. Let's see what group is willing to come out through the RFQ.

What did you want to call it? Okay, let's do a request for interest on this. So that's the first three things to do. You're going to have to go through the process of the lease to see where you stand and do your soils because there's a soils issue. I'm not sure what that is but okay so do the soils number two and number three go due for the request for interest right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:44:51

I think that the other one would be to get I don't want to put the blinders on this but let's do those

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:45:25

I'll make a motion along with that direction. If somebody wants to second, do I need to make a formal motion on this? There's my formal motion with those three items. Let's make it not so hard that we need to bring it back and we don't want months to bring this back. Okay, is there a wait? I don't want to necessarily keep it open-ended but let's just make sure that we have this coming down to keep updated. So it's been motioned by myself second by Starbuck and let's go ahead

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:46:03

and vote.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:46:09

And it passes 5-0. Thank you, guys. We keep our eyes open. We've been waiting 20 plus years for this so we're not blinding anything out. This is taking us to the next level. All right now what do we got? Oh my goodness up again oral communications another three minutes. Come

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:46:34

on down. Come on down Carl Jones citizen how are you doing? I'm here to share a story, I guess. It's potentially serious disease problems. So I was outside working on my trailer the other day. We got a trailer that's parked down there off of Laurel Avenue. I've already called cops about this talking about this. It's an older trailer probably from the 60s maybe early 70s.

First time I ever spotted it sitting over on Maple Street moved down to Laurel down the block for me Police officer talked to him, moved across the street. So I'm sitting there and I see this gentleman come out of his trailer with a big old clear bucket. It was yellow liquid in it and two floating logs, brown logs. He throws it out in the field. Human waste right there in the field.

So short list, E. coli, salmonella, C. diff, norovirus, hepatitis A, giardia and there's one that's from the tropic that we really don't have to worry about but those are a short list of bacteria, virus and pathogens that can be passed on for human waste. This gentleman is out there throwing it right next to my house in the field. I have a neighbor with small kids. I have another neighbor who has got elderly in him There's multiple elderly people in my neighborhood and multiple small kids. These are the people who are most susceptible to these diseases.

It's one of the reasons why we came up with sewer systems, save a lot of lives for people no longer throwing them on the ground right outside in the streets when we still have that problem here in Lompoc. I feel sorry for the people on the riverbed that back up to it, because that stuff's happening right down there. Any place we have the unhoused, the homeless, whatever you wish to call them, that are not using their facilities correctly and dumping them onto street or dumping into a field, we have this problem in this city.

The city, the county, the state, whoever needs to get involved, we do need to get this under control. The last thing we want to see is an outbreak because it's not pretty. I have personally been involved with solving an outbreak of dysentery in the military, foodborne illness. It's not good to see at all. Literally not good to see at all when you see people puking and pooping at the same time while they've got three IVs and you're wondering if they're going to live or die.

That's not a good thing to see. These are things we really need to take a close look at. I understand having a heart for people that don't have homes and all this other stuff, but when it's causing these type of issues in our society, it's not right and we really need to come up with some kind of plan to get this stuff solved. Because it's not fair to the taxpayers, it's not fair to the people who have families out here. I have to worry about when I have a barbecue in my backyard, why am I staying in New Mexico, you know? I'm in a hospital. I just want to bring it up. Thank you.

1:49 – 1:5514 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:49:59

Karen Hellenstein. Lifelong resident. Okay. Shortly before I was arrested for violating an unlawful order of protection that was brought against me by our police captain, I received a response from the Department of Justice about the official complaint I made to police officer standards and training in December of last year Regarding the death of Liliana Zuniga inside our Lompoc police station in March of 2023.

We are still due the report that was promised us by Chief Martin on that death, that report needs to come publicly according to the Department of Justice The police department has 30 days from today to comply. Thank you.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:51:09

Anybody else? Anybody on Teams' phone?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:51:14

There is one public comment via Teams. Participant with the phone number 0786, you are being unmuted. You have three minutes for your public comment. You may speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:51:40

Can everyone hear me?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:51:44

Yes. Can you speak a little louder, please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:51:47

Yes. How about

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:51:48

now? A little louder, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:51:52

OK. How's this?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:51:55

Councilor, are you able to hear? OK. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:52:00

OK, we're trying to solve the issue of the field. I believe there are many ways to solve this problem. We've lost her.

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:52:11

I apologize to interrupt. Can you please speak any louder? Yes, how about

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:52:16

now?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:52:17

That is a great level.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:52:21

Perfect. I believe there are many ways to solve the issue when it comes to the sports field that we're trying to utilize. We have many famous sports players from Lompoc that have went on to the big leagues essentially. They would be a great resource to reach out to When it comes to trying to get funding. Alongside that, attempting to reach out to Home Depot or other local businesses that could potentially donate products we may need.

They get a tax deduction, we get what we need. We could potentially look into reaching out to the prison, the warden and offering You know, we'll take some of the inmates. They'll have a corrections guard or two or three and have them help. If any of you have been here long enough, you know that the inmates were the ones that cleared out that camp, the brush and everything out front.

When you drive by the prison, you can see it's very much cleared out. We could maybe mention if they do this get a reduction in their sentences for contributing to public good There's many options here. One thing I want to touch on though because the mention of flock cameras was brought up, having rapport in your community is extremely important. We have community members who have all of the items we need to collectively donate our time, our energy, everything we need to create what we really want in this community We have that.

But the thing is, is that requires building community. Now where do you flock cameras come into play? Flock cameras do not build more trust in your community. They cause a chilling sensation. They make people feel unsafe when it comes to having the community at large, right? It becomes us, the citizens against what we perceive as the government. But none of us, we're all human. We're all in this together. We can be in this together.

But if we create this differentiation, we need to surveil everyone and watch them at all times, we're not going to get what we need. We're just gonna keep... Not we but the citizens are going to get pushed further and further away and it's going to cause problems now When it comes to flaw cameras, police are legally required to get a warrant signed by a judge to perform surveillance on people. We know this, it doesn't matter if it's in public or private.

There was mention of once people understand the benefit, sure you lower crime but at what cost? At that point just put us in camp.

1:55 – 2:053 turns

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed1:55:34

Speaker 0786, your three minutes are up.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role1:55:42

Anything else? Anybody else? Thank you speaker. Seeing nobody else we will close the order of communication bring it back to the agenda council requests number six adoption of resolution number 6841 parentheses 26 establishing a construction Board of Appeals, Michael Lowe, Building and Safety Service Manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:56:11

Good evening, Michael Lowe. This evening I'm presenting an item, a resolution for the council to consider to create a construction board of appeals locally. Just to give some context, the council has been working towards this effort since October 21st when it created an ad hoc committee. I left up there some of the work that the ad hoc committee had completed specifically a developers roundtable because the primary topic of discussion was at that developer roundtable The first item was about the construction board of appeals and then on July 7th we presented the strategic plan.

So to give some background and context, as part of any decision that a building official makes that affects real property there needs to be some form of a structured proceeding for settling disputes. One of the key players for these dispute resolutions is the City Council. So this resolution will formally transfer or delegate that authority into a dedicated board, which is pretty common practice industrywide.

A board made up of appointed individuals from the community with technical expertise in And so this is the response to the community feedback that we got and the ad hoc committee feedback we got pertaining to dispute resolution. Just to remind the council, we were told that there was a lot of back-and-forth In the review process, that didn't seem to transpire into resolution and there were concerns that the back-and-forth was creating so much friction in the process that it was making progress or building in the community more difficult. And so this is an effort of response to the council.

After staff reviewed the appeal record, it was not that appeals weren't coming to the council. It's just that they were very infrequent. The cost of the appeal right now is around $2,000. And so this is an initiative to not necessarily We wanted to do something that the city wasn't already doing. We were already meeting our statutory obligations to provide an appeals process. This is an opportunity to optimize that process in response to the ad hoc committee's feedback and community's feedback.

And so part of that would be to document what those disputes are, hear it before a local construction And then to do it in open session in meetings covered by the brown act to be transparent about how the disputes are being settled. One thing that I can commit to you as your building official, and just to say how I believe this process should play out is it's not intended to be adversarial. It's intended to focus on very I'm here today to talk about is this design, is this type of construction safe or not?

And to come to that conclusion openly and transparently Thank you. Just to give you an overview of what functions specifically, the building code has a process known as alternate materials and methods. This authority is actually delegated to the building official in order to allow local jurisdiction to authorize type of work or method that may not be explicitly written A good example of this would be when you install a sprinkler system in a building, there are over 2,000 exceptions in the codes for other measures of that building. But the code requires the sprinkler system to be installed throughout meaning it has in all portions of the building, but a sprinkler system could still have some benefits even partially installed. And so an alternative materials and methods request that I have approved in the past is to offset one unachievable fire protection requirement with a partial sprinkler system.

Now, in that scenario it would be an alternate way of accomplishing compliance but it would not necessarily meet the letter of the code because the code only references sprinkler systems throughout buildings. In the event that a developer or designer proposes an alternate and I disagree with them, they could take it before the Construction Board of Appeals to see if that body has a different opinion.

Otherwise, generally speaking all other technical decisions made by the building official are appealable including interpretations. And then the body will also have hearings regarding administrative citations that are relevant to Title 15 so if we cite a violation maybe a stop work order and we If you don't get compliance with that notice, it could be accompanied with a daily citation. When that citation is issued, that would be appealable to this body.

It will also function as the housing appeals board which is pretty standard practice as well and that would only be relevant if we were citing something out of the health and safety sections that are listed in And then in addition to that, they would transmit the decisions report that to the City Council and then also offer recommendations for new legislation. And so from time to time when a appeal is heard it may not be necessarily because There is a disagreement on what is safe. It could just be a disagreement on the clarity or the actual wording in the code, and so in times like that these bodies could make recommendations to the council to say hey we need to clarify this language locally because contractors and staff are not seeing eye-to-eye.

After the adoption of this resolution, the next steps would be to complete the CBOA membership application process. That would be an administrative task. The City Council would then have a proposal in January to appoint those members to the board. That would be formal action by the council. And then an appeals application and new fee schedule. The application would be an administrative task, but we would bring the new fee schedule to the board for consideration... I'm sorry, to the council for consideration.

We're going to work with a city attorney to create an administrative standard operating procedure to guide staff in a standardized process so that it can be This meeting was quickly facilitated upon request with the goal of having the first meeting in April. Just as a reminder, even if there aren't any public hearings or appeals within the bylaws it stipulates to still meet quarterly and we would be able Statistics on the work that's occurring within the building and safety division. I typically will present the number of permits that we have issued, what maybe our inspection lead time is or review lead times are and then also present any alternative method material requests that as building official I have already reviewed and approved just so they can be a part of public record for future considerations So before you use the recommendation to adopt the resolution and I'm happy to answer any questions about this.

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:05 – 2:1023 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:05:20

Just two quick questions and just for clarity on that, you've mentioned something about it used example of like a stop work order and you know somebody can go and appeal that is it Is it essentially taking out the teeth of any sort of stop work order or is there still, you know obviously there's state mandates and if you're doing it wrong you gotta stop. Can you talk me through that example I guess?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:05:41

Yeah, no. That was just a specific example of something we might issue an administrative citation for but it could be really anything that we issue this citation for. That example was just used to highlight that the board will have public hearings if somebody wants to dispute being issued a citation relevant to Title 15 of the Municipal Code.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:06

Thank you for

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:06:07

that. So not losing any teeth?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:09

Okay, so you still have the ability. I mean if the state says you can't do something they've stopped the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:06:13

funding. And just so you know there's additional administrative language within Chapter 1 of the Building Code about the Board of Appeals and one of the things it explicitly says is that the board does not have the ability to waive any requirements of the code.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:30

Thank you for that. I'm an electrician. I know everything.

not transcribed≈39s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:07:04

I'm going to pass it over to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:07:34

Mike, I'm reading the fiscal impact here now is for the appeal and it looks like it's a lower cost or zero cost for the applicant if they appeal to this construction board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:07:47

We still haven't done the analysis yet to bring back what the new appeal fee is. Preliminarily, it looks like it could be reduced and even scaled based on the project. And so I don't have all those facts and figures ready for you yet. But

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:08:03

it's like $1,000 right or something like that? To bring it back to council or is 2,000? It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:08:07

2,00 now. There is a provision also in the municipal code that if they win the appeal they'll get refunded that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:08:14

Okay, so there is a benefit to them going through this board. If it's scalable and you deem it lower as far as the cost, cost-effective way?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:08:25

Yeah, and so what I'll do is analyze the types of projects that we typically have as well and compare it to our current fee schedules for service within the building department. What I mean by that is we've already established hourly rates for building and safety staff And so we'll bring that recommendation back to the council and have a whole separate presentation on the fees for it before January.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:08:53

So if they win the appeal, there will be a zero cost is what you're saying?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:08:57

That's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:08:58

OK, gotcha. Thank you. Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09:04

I just want to piggyback off of that. I love the idea of scalability, however that may come out. Somebody working on a shed or something simple versus somebody who's got a multi-unit project obviously. So equity would be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:09:17

great. And so the way that we come up with these is the time that it takes staff, the reasonable cost of service and so what I have found is that when it's a simpler project like you're stating, it takes a lot less time For that, so I hope to bring something back that reflects that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:09:38

Cancer Vega Mike. So for instance he brought up a good point So if it's somebody just building an 8 by 10 shed in their backyard we had a guy over here that Had you know, he wasn't completely agreeable You would scale it to the project or still buy the hourly rate. Is that right? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:09:55

There would be an established fee and currently on our building and safety fees we have scalable rates based on the size of projects. So if it's a certain square footage, I'm still working on the parameters around it but if you'd like to provide I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:10:16

happy

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:10:17

to hear some feedback on that.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:10 – 2:168 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:41

One quick question. Just considering that there are so many exceptions and so many complexities to the code, locally speaking, I'm putting you on the spot a little bit, is the complexity of our local code part of the reason that we have to charge so much for you guys to dig in and figure out what it means? Or is that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:11:01

just... That's a fair question. You can follow up with me on that too if you need to. I think what I would say generally speaking is that the more complex the project, the more difficult the interpretation. And it sometimes varies depending on what part of the code that you're in or even which standards. So plumbing... and it varies with your building official. It's like I'm going to be a lot better in building code than I am in the plumbing code.

But I think the idea is that there's a general, reasonable expectation for how much time there is going to be administratively. Meaning we just have to put the documents together, get them posted or publicly post if there's public hearing. We have to show up here and come in and present. But I've also been a part of appeals where we've, I've spent weeks preparing for it.

And so in those instances you won't recoup all of your costs. You don't know that and so generally speaking with user fees there are always some winners and some losers and so our job is to as best we can establish the reasonable cost.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:12:32

Councilor Bridges.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:12:34

Just for clarity for the public, the majority of the code you're referencing is California State building code and things of that nature. They're not our municipal code. I mean we do have some of that generally hits planning more than building but the codes you keep saying as they're going to appeal or come back to the board, the alternate methods that you're discussing I'm going to ask you a question about the building codes that are contained within one of the state mandated building codes.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:13:31

Council Member Bull? I guess to that point, is there a chance that the Board of Appeals is discussing something that they may not have the purview to change because it's sort of set in stone in state code or are you saying well, it's based on interpretations. I guess what I'm saying is like if the Board of Appeals, they disagreed with an interpretation of state code that you said no, I think it should be this way and they said oh we don't think that's right. Who's the arbiter of who's right I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about how that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:14:02

would work in terms of the state code. That's what the Board of Appeals will do. The way it would work is specific to a project, so how does the state code apply to this particular project? And in that instance, the Board of Appeals would be the final decision maker

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:14:30

public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:14:55

I support this. It's a great idea, but let's make it transparent when we're hiring people. Let's not just get our construction friends into these positions or buddies in there. Let's get some community members in here. Let's make it transparent, because the board won't just deal with technical construction issues. We've heard tonight they will also serve as Lompoc's Housing Appeal Board and care appeal involving building fire code decisions review, administrative consultations and even recommend future changes in municipal code.

So for many families especially immigrant families navigating building And housing process can already feel overwhelming. Language barriers, financial hardships and lack of familiarity with government systems often make it difficult to advocate for themselves. If this board is making decisions that affect housing safety codes and enforcement then the community deserves a meaningful seat at the table I encourage the Council to think beyond technical qualifications, along yes we need professionals with experience but we also need members who have lived experience of Lompoc residents.

People who rent a home here, own a small business here or work in our neighbourhoods every day I also ask that the appointed process be transparent, widely advertised and accessible for community organizations. Neighborhood leaders, renters and ordinary residents should know that these positions exist and have an opportunity to apply or nominate qualified candidates. When our boards reflect the diversity of our community we make better decisions, build greater public trust and recreate a government that truly deserves everybody. So make it transparent please.

2:16 – 2:2225 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:16:47

We'll see beyond the phone or teams are.

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed2:16:51

There is no public comment via teams

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:16:54

to nobody else rise, we will close public comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:04

Yeah Mike, just a quick question. As I understood this board that we're creating it's one of our standard commission type boards and it will follow the Brown Act?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:17:15

Yeah yeah it'll be subject to the Brown Act and stipulated within the bylaws you must be a resident of Lompoc to serve on the board

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:23

And Stacey, just to put you on the spot for a moment. All our boards and commissions are posted on the front of the building I believe?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:17:35

Yes, we posted on the website. We posted up at the front of the lobby and then also on the bulletin board out front. We can post it more places too. I do give it to the library so if you have some place that you want it to go, we can email them as well just if anybody wants to see it. Do you attempt

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:54

to get it out in public?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:17:55

We try and get it out to as many people as possible yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:59

So Mike, I think one of your big challenges at least in my limited experience is getting citizens to participate. So you may have to make some particularly in this case because it's kind of a narrow niche. You're probably going to have to do some outreach to find people. I know that when I've tried to get commissions filled It can be a challenge. People are busy and they're just busy so that's my only concern about the whole board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:18:34

Yeah, and if we do have trouble filling the seats we could always bring back recommendations to I just wanted to expand what the qualifications would be. I've been in localities where you didn't necessarily have to be a resident, but you had to maybe work and so it could be extended to people who have business tax certificates and do business here. But right now the recommendation stands as residents of Lompoc and our first effort will

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:19:10

And I would have the appointments be at large appointments, much like the airport, not directly under a council seat so that it's the group. It's the pool. It is not one guy looking for one guy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:19:24

Yeah and I think...I'm not as familiar with this part of it. That isn't stipulated in the bylaws but I believe this is all being added to the handbook where that's outlined.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:19:36

Just a recommendation and you might question whether Somebody could actually, we have a rule now that you can't be on two commissions but you might open this up to an opportunity for somebody. This one could be on the second commission. I'm looking at the city attorney on that one is that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:53

That would be fine if he wanted to recommend that but i wanted to go back to your previous comment um currently the way that it the recommendation is set up is that each member of the board would be nominated by a council member and one by the mayor, and that their terms would be concurrent with the term of the nominating council member. So if you wanted to make it at large, you could make that change in your motion tonight.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:20:22

Making it large and you could have the same seats like we have in airport commissions, library commissions. Those commissions aren't so tangible as I'm a member of the council, but they are the four-year seats, the two-year seats. The first time out, they wrote me at two-year seats, called two two-year seats, three four-year seats. The next time that two-years becomes a four-year seat.

That way you have people transitioning. That would be my recommendation there along

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:20:52

with... Are you, sorry just for clarity, so offsetting the terms?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:20:58

No we don't have the board wiped out We have things like that, the transition, the two-year seat, four-seat. And then the next time they will be the four-year seats. First rollout you have to have some two-year seats. That way you have some transitioning that can go on with this board. Does anybody else got any discussion I could make? Do you want to make this motion on this one? Or Amal, do you want me to carry on? What do you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:21:23

want?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:21:26

What's your motion? You're a funny guy. You want to add those things I was saying? No worries. Put them in, you'll make it as a claimer? All right. So I've got three basic things there that are at large of the group that can come from other commissions and that you start off with them being four-year seats but you start out with two of them being two-year seats and three of them four-year Anybody think of anything else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:22:01

I'm just not sure that they'll want one of our commissioners if we don't run anymore or something, but that's... Well they're not our

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:22:07

commissioners.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:22:08

They're at large just like the airport, just like a library. Everything else I'm okay with, okay?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:22:12

Alright, whatever you think. They're at large. Yeah, at large, I'm good with that. Okay, at large, alright. So there's a first and a second in adding my items, is that what you were saying? Adding my items. You guys got any other items you wanna add to that? Oh, my goodness. All right, let's go ahead and vote. I'm going to make my finger really slow tonight, Starbucks.

Yeah, barely 5-0 pass. You're lucky. All right. What do you want to do now? Do you need your more coffee? Excuse me. Hey,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:22:53

you know what?

2:22 – 2:282 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:22:56

All right. Brings item number seven that's consideration of changing landfill tipping fees for those who are not city solid waste collection customers. Item number 7 Mr. Cross.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:23:16

Good evening Mayor, council members this was an item that was requested to be brought back but at this meeting We're going to talk a little bit about the current rates from the last meeting. So it was originally presented in September 2024. We're bringing back now just for review. It's really great for the landfill. Most of the staff report. Landfill rates are not subject to Prop 218. They aren't unlike water, wastewater.

We don't have to charge based on cost of service. We're allowed to charge whatever the market bears. It's a competitive process. So right now our landfill rates are 18 per card at $28 for under 500 pounds There are two local landfills. The main one is Santa Maria, which is 30 miles away and their rates are a little different. They're 55 for 300 to 1,000 pounds and 105 over 1050 pounds.

Local landfills where is to he was they only take commercial? Items and they're about 30 miles away. There are two hundred three dollars per pound or per ton, excuse me so we can We can increase the rates to two times or one-and-a-half times Whatever the council determines we currently there's a There's a part of our ordinance that allows us to charge two times for out-of-city customers for solid waste collections, because that's based on the cost of service of serving those customers. It costs more to go out to those customers and pick up.

So that's why the two times is there but that's not really related to what that ordinance states. Some of the pros and cons of doing any type of increase for the Lompoc landfill. Pros, it could increase revenue if we are only looking at commercial non-residents I think there's some value there but a lot This is an opportunity for us to look at what the county determined to do with their whether they determine it was less expensive to go to Santa Maria or Which on the other hand, that would preserve more of the life of the landfill. The landfill currently, I think two years ago we were estimating about a 10-year life so we're still have some years left on it but if we're diverting some of that waste elsewhere, that would save some of the life in landfill which will save us costs of planning for that.

Some of the cons? I'm going to go through the process of doing this. If we were to apply it to all customers, it would probably increase lines at the landfill. It would require additional training and probably programming in Right now it's programmed for just current rate, so it would probably again. It could take longer if we're checking ideas, checking passes, checking you to see if there if their customers or if they're non residents.

And then it also, with an increased cost of landfill, could lead to possibly more illegal dumping. People not bringing to the landfill instead of finding different places to put those. So that's most of my presentation. We're going to bring that back as a resolution. Whatever the decision is if there's a decision to increase we could bring that back as a resolution to future meeting soon.

So that's another consideration is how and when to apply any increase

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈38s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:28 – 2:3415 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:28:42

I have a question for you. Why do we charge 1.5 times rate for water or sewer outside limits?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:28:56

I

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:28:58

was always, back in 2012 when I got a utility commission and the former Utility Commissioner Larry Bean explained to me why this is one-and-a-half times rate. And I was always led to believe that we were charging two times rate for solid waste. Have we never charged for commercial waste coming in from out of area for two times rate?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:29:20

Not

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:29:20

at the landfill, no. Never at the landfill? And the argument was... Not to my knowledge. Pardon? Not to my knowledge. I thought we were but that the argument back then was people outside the city limits we don't gain property tax from them and the property tax pays for things like fixing streets cleaning the streets if you just bought a couple sweet streets well hopefully by the second one second street sweeper here but this is one of We paid for that right away. When people are outside the city limits, we're not getting property tax from them and we're not with general fund revenue.

So this was part of the makeup process is why we did this. So what that means is the people who are outside the city limits, the people in the City of Lompoc are subsidizing their trash hauling into our landfill when they're going up and down our streets. We're paying for the repair and maintenance of those streets. It's not the people who are outside our area.

That was the argument that I got along with That was the logic as to why we had one and a half of the two times rates.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈24s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:31:16

I really just want clarity here. So Marburg, they right now pay the same rate? Yes. And we get the county regularly bringing their landfill to

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:31:34

us?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:31:36

Are you saying the same thing when so it's Marburg servicing Vandenberg Village and maybe Megalady Canyon

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:31:53

I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:31:55

guessing now they don't have a standard, they get a bill once a month or something. Do they have to pay for every car or every truck that comes in at the gate? And it's just a known entity they know that...

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:32:12

They pay by the ton.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:32:15

Okay, well I see this as kind of two problems or two issues. To me what I heard you say in your staff report is that having two raids for In-N-Out are in and out of the area will create longer lines and it's going to have to train the people and blah blah blah so and I recognize that or accept that But really, if we just made it the commercial guys, I think that problem would probably go away.

And I doubt that a Santa Maria guy is going to drive 20 miles to save seven bucks. So we're talking about Vandenberg Village, Mission Hills, maybe a little bit of the outlying areas. Whereas I'm with you on the commercial side You know, we should be paying more for that. They're heavy trucks are coming in. I think from what I'm seeing, I could kind of support the third item on there having some correction and what they charge and keep the other two. So let's just pass it on my opinion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:33:39

I think on the commercial side, if there's anything to be increased that would be the only thing. I would be probably kind of for if you did it one and a half times rate for just a commercial. The issue is with I would want to raise it for the Lompoc residents. I really have an issue with the unincorporated areas, the residents here in the Vandenberg Village and Mission Hills. I think they should be treated just like Lompoc residents. They are Lompok.

I don't like the exclusion. I wish they were able to vote for us also in this city and stuff. But I think those people should be left alone but included if we're not already. You know, is Mission Hills as far as you know? Bob and Vandenberg Village are treated the same as us probably?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:34:29

I'm not sure. County...I don't know how far ours always... With what we

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:34:35

collect.

2:34 – 2:4014 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:34:52

Our collection is always, you know, is included in the collection rate. Well we don't put the landfills included in the collection rate so it would be anything outside of our typical collection routes that's collected by another entity and whether they're collecting I don't know that we would be able to necessarily distinguish that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:35:23

Yeah, well the commercial part you would be able to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:35:25

Right yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:35:26

So I would just stick to the commercial part of it. Sure yeah. I don't think it's fair to raise rates on everybody because you know again we've all experienced where people start dumping and it turns into a code enforcement issue and then it's a stress for the homeowner who has stuff dumped in their alleys or in their yards and stuff and it makes Lompoc look That's kind of my thought process. The one and a half times the rate for the commercial rate, I would be okay with that but don't touch the other customers.

That's not very much money, but it's something. It's something and it's kind of so noted. I've heard of different rate structures in Nipomo and Santa Maria. There's people that will drive from Santa Maria to Nipomo to save a buck, but I don't think they're going to drive from Lompoc to Santa Maria to save a couple bucks. So that's kind of my thought process guys without being unfair. I think the commercial aspect of it is different.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:30

Jeff, I have a quick question. I think one of the property I have used is Marburg. Do I have to recuse myself?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:36:45

I don't believe you need to recuse yourself at this point. It relates to what I was going to say. I think that there could be a legal issue if we're gonna try to charge a higher rate businesses who are coming from outside the city than we are to individuals or residents from outside the city. So I would want to look into the legalities of that before the council actually approves those changed rates.

But that's the direction you...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:37:21

Back to my issue, we're talking about...I've heard Marburg and it just dawned on me, I think Marburg picks up my trash so do I need to recuse myself?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:37:35

It's probably the safe thing to do, but right off the top of my head I cannot do that analysis. Okay, so is it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:37:42

safe enough to just not vote on it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:37:45

No. If you're going to recuse yourself, you would need to leave the room for any discussion that is particular to a fee on only Marburg or commercial operators like Marburg. If we're just talking about anyone outside the city or anyone that's not a Lompoc collection customer then you are fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:38:12

Yeah, I get it. And I remember this question a while back. You know, what is the big picture of this? Does it make sense for... Are we hooking up our competitors by giving them such a discounted rate that we're being taken advantage of and then we talk about the life expectancy of them. So I guess for me it's like I'd love legal clarity like can we even do this maybe we should have that before we make a decision but from my point of view Obviously if it's $230 at, or it was pretty high at Tahegas right? And they only accept commercial.

So at some point if a company is picking up trash around here probably doesn't make sense for them to go to Tahegas. They'd probably prefer to use us and if they are having negative impacts streets big line and whatever or their life expectancy of the dump is down seven years and that's going to bring on some costs that we're not ready for Again I'd love to just know, like I think it's fair for a competing outside of town entity to pay more to use our facility. That seems reasonable but again I think legal has to provide clarity there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:39:26

I just want to be clear there is no legal problem with charging a higher rate to entities or individuals who are outside of the city limits, or who are not solid waste collection customers. The issue where I think there could be a legal issue is if we're making a further distinction and saying entities, we're going to charge lower rates to individuals outside the city and we're going to charge higher rates to businesses outside the city. I think that is where we could get into trouble.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:57

And I guess we need, I want clarity. Is it is the people that pick up the trash outside of the area? Is that the business or are you referring to like us charging commercial businesses and The Village or Mission Hills more to come in just... I'm talking about the collection company.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:40:12

When you're saying commercial, I assume you mean Marlboro and the collection companies outside the city that collect outside the city.

2:40 – 2:5025 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:22

I'm confused so I'm sorry. We can charge Marburg anything we want as long as another commercial outfit is operating in our city, we have to charge them the same.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:40:48

outside the city. So Marburg collects outside the city, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:52

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:40:54

So we need to charge Marburg the same that we charge an individual who lives outside the city.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:59

That's what I'm saying. Does that apply to the... so let's just say for a hypothetical conversation here. We say our car rates $18 for anybody and our minimum flat fee is $28 for anybody But our tip fee per ton for these bigger, whoever they are, we charge $2.30. That's OK?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:41:29

As long as it applies the same to everyone who is coming from outside the city, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:41:34

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:35

OK.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:41:39

I think if a commercial business were to come with two tons worth of stuff, they would have to be charged that amount if they're non-resident. If

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:49

they're outside the city, they would be charged the same. But if I have one of those roll offs inside the city and I'm in this city and I bring that out, I would be charging the $115,000.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:42:05

Council Regan, you still have a question?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:42:06

Yeah. You know the we're mixing it up with saying businesses and stuff but that's not what we're looking at. We're looking at commercial. It's not a name of a business just because he owns a business and he gets trash dumped by Marlboro. That's not what it is. We are talking about a commercial entity coming in from out-of-town dumping trash correct? It's not for the residents, it's not for Vandenberg Village and it's not for Mission Hills.

I heard two things here okay? Everybody is mixing it up with businesses and commercial.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:42:46

If somebody from Vandenberg Village came with a big roll off you would have to charge them $230 if that's the going rate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:42:54

And they would be considered commercial correct? Is that what you're saying?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:42:57

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:43:00

don't agree with that. You guys are mixing it up and not throwing in the regular customers in there and trying to get into their pocket, okay? Give me a question. The roll-off, there's a fee for that anyway. But we're talking about like these commercial garbage people coming in and stuff? That's the ones I was thinking about. You know, people are...I thought that's what you guys were leaning toward to try and at least let them pay since it's going to cost them money to go somewhere else anyway.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:43:32

I don't think we can distinguish between commercial and resident. It's just the 500 pound limit, I believe.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:43:42

Okay, well you know it's a little confusing otherwise I'm not going to be supporting it if we're gonna get the residents.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:43:51

Any more questions? We'll go to public comment and bring it back. Public comment here we go we got one coming down

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:44:08

Good evening, Derek Carlson. I am the Finance and Contract Manager for Marborg Industries and have been waiting all night to talk about trash. So, I don't have comments so much on what the City of Lompoc should be charging for their solid waste and what kind of money you need to generate at your landfill But as far as talking about the implementation part, I do have some comments on how that might work. On the staff report it says that you know wouldn't be implemented until January 1st but in order to have new rates set for the customers and these are residential and commercial customers so Marburg Industries serves all the residential the city of Lompoc and the commercial businesses. So both of those groups would be charged this higher rate, and so for in order for those rates to be adjusted, the county would need to know around January and then they would be able to adjust rates on July 1st.

And so you know a rate implementation being done on Could be filtered through the whole system. So, you know there are funds available to pay the rate. You know on the flip side if you're doubling the rate or one and a half in the rate without being able to adjust rates for the customer is kind of where you end up in this situation where now the bills twice as much as the Customers getting charged and you know, that's why the county redirected waste for two months or they need to redirect waste for six months because there's not parity between what's being charged and then You know what? The customer is paying for so I didn't want to make that clear And then you know We just want to be able to collaborate with you know Lompoc on this when we bid For the contract we were competing against waste management a couple other haulers A couple of years ago, the first call was to the city of Lompoc and asking if Lompoc was interested in this waste.

Did you need this waste for your budget? We figured it probably would be noticed if it went missing and it was taken to another landfill. And at that time we said yes, we want the waste to come our budget depends on it. And so we made that commitment because it made financial sense and We made sure from the start that it was something that worked for the city of Lompoc at the time. If it doesn't, you know any more than it just does become kind of a price game. You know if it goes to 230 Let me ask a question here for you. So if we raise the rates today, Yes, so the county does their rate adjustments every July.

And so they're the ones that raise the rates. Our board cannot... The county

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:47:43

collects for you guys? You contract with the county?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:47:46

We contract to the county right. So we have a franchise agreement for them and

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:47:50

I gotcha.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:47:50

Every July yes is when they adjust rates.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:47:54

Have you guys communicated with the county at all of that? I'm going to the city attorney and city manager Have you guys, has anybody even said anything from the county meeting? Probably not right. Yeah they didn't come up to the colonies of Lompoc I'm sure. No okay all right so all right that's very interesting because they don't have any problem raising my rates real fast on anything yeah. All right um Again, the reason why I was looking at it is we know that the people of Lompoc have established a landfill, built a landfill and a lot of it was general fund money. A lot of it was revenue from the local payers.

My concern was logically I always felt that they were always getting charged a two times rate, not just because our trash truck goes 100 foot outside the city limits. That person gets charged two times rate but it was the rationale that we're not collecting the property tax for the people who are getting this. We know where the landfill was not too long ago what was we were negative five six seven million bucks So not realizing that this hadn't been done. My questioning of this a year and a half, two years ago was what's going on? Because I always thought we were doing this in the logic as for With the solid waste aspects, it would still put us in the ballpark.

It would help to pay, we just got another million-dollar tractor up there at the landfill. And we just raised the rates. How much did you saw the rates go up? 60%? Between 4 times 15, right? You wanted another 17%, because we're still operating in the red. So it appears to me that the fine people of Lompoc are subsidized in the trash rates Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:50 – 2:5717 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:50:27

I'm kind of curious how big this thing is. So we're collecting, the numbers are gone now, 130 I think it was or 115? 115. Yeah, I mean in an annual basis what is that number?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:50:43

We get from Marward we get about 500 to 600 thousand a year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:50:50

Okay so it's a big number then and So when we raised our rates on our people, city people. Did we raise those rates? Excuse me? When we raised our rates did we raise that 115?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:51:17

Yes these are scheduled these have a five-year schedule this is there's one more increase to these they go up I think the car goes up a dollar or two, and then it goes up a couple dollars. I think tip fee goes up five to ten dollars per year.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:51:36

My rational motion without beating this up more is that we do much the same as we're doing for water and wastewater, which is the one-and-a-half times rate for outside the area. I think it will more than cover whatever increased expense somebody has to put two more buttons or four I think it was a rationale that We argued that before, but you were a resident of Lompoc. You used to be able to take your vehicle up and dump your truck for free.

Nobody cared about that when we raised that rate that the Lompoc residents couldn't dump anymore. That resulted in an increase in burden on the community. So I really don't think somebody's going to come from Mesa Oaks and drive all the way into town to dump. Legitimate argument, my motion is simply enforced that we implement these. It'll keep us right close to Santa Maria's landfill. It keeps us one and a half times rate less than the Tahiga's landfill.

Likewise too work with the commercial aspects in the same motion so let me make the motion there.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:52:56

Thank you.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:53:10

to all of them, so all the rates that we have at the Lompoc current rate outside the city you could pay one and a half times. So car load is going to go up $9 more.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:53:20

One

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:53:20

and a half times on all of that aspect work with the commercial aspects that have these hauling contracts. So then set the motion you guys and Mr Luther as well put your heads together on that. So one and Right? Because that way we have to charge everybody equally the same while we're doing that money. And that would be a simple calculation, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:46

Council Member Bull. Can I have a minute for a couple questions real quick? Yeah sure. I mean I don't necessarily disagree but I think my putting on my fiduciary hat I'm stressed about creating a scenario where we have a window where we just drop revenue because there's a billing cycle issue So again, I'm not necessarily against that. But is there a chance that an entity, commercial entity or whatever So I'm not again. I think I find a lot of agreement. I think the equity saying, I guess my question, the second part of that is if we have to do it for everyone this goes back to raise rates for everyone outside the city even if they are Lompoc Valley.

not transcribed≈24s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:55:01

The point of fact is if we're collecting and our trash truck goes out 100 foot outside, it's two times rate. And the same rationale that we're one-and-a-half times rate and the logic being is that we're not getting the property tax other aspects of that. I would say along with that can I make a motion here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:55:22

I'm just going to give you a fair warning. I can support the commercial side in reference to what Councilman Ball is saying, we could put some timing on it but I'm not going to support Mission Hills guys having to pay more money under. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:55:39

not going to support their rate increase for everybody either.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:55:43

You're not going to support, so you want the people of Lompoc to continue to subsidize? Sorry. I just don't support any rate increases right now. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:55:52

Sorry. Is it fair for us to get because I mean, I feel like you kind of told us it's probably a not but can we get perfect, legally sound clarity on whether we can separate those things. It does make me curious because in this context we get to charge market rates. We get to be competitive. We get to do a lot of things in this context that we don't necessarily get to do in others. So does it make sense for us to get more clarity? Because if we could separate commercial here and there's a fair timeline for them to make their adjustments for their customers but locals, if you're in the Lompoc Valley, you don't take a hit.

I don't know. It just seems reasonable

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:56:28

to me. Thank

not transcribed≈40s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:56:55

you. So with not being able to say you can't commercial or residential, did you want to have that come back until he can give a ruling on that?

2:57 – 3:0235 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:57:33

I'd leave it up if you feel pretty comfortable making the call now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:57:39

I don't want to imply that it's a no. I just said that it's something that I would want to look into if you wanted to make that distinction between commercial prices charged to commercial entities versus prices charged to individuals, can you treat them differently?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:57:56

Let's bring this back in two months. You need two months? We can't,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:58:01

we can't... Wait a minute. Put the rates back up a minute. I just want to be clear what I'm saying. I'm just saying the tip fee rate, I don't care who it is coming from out of town will pay your one and a half. Anybody in the car in those volumes whatever the weight I guess it is so I'm not suggesting discriminating on residents or commercial I'm just saying if they're tipping more than 5, well I guess it's 500

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:58:43

pounds. You're saying you only want that third column, the tip fee to be 1.5x? Yes. There's no problem with that? I

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:58:50

thought so. The tip fee, the third bottom line? So just raise the tip fee and leave the car fee down at 18 bucks?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:01

So again, I'm not necessarily against that. I think my worst case scenario is let's say Marboard gets these new rates and they can't make an adjustment until July. I'm just playing devil's advocate. And then they decide well it's just cheaper for us to drive Santa Maria or bite the bullet at Tahecus for some reason because we can't...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:59:18

Yeah, I've

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:19

got

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:59:19

opposed to a timing thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:21

I mean so that's why I think we should...I'm not disagreeing with you. I just think we should bring it back with a little bit more

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role2:59:27

But what I was getting at is if we did implementation, we wouldn't implement it until July 1st for the tonnage fee. Just because you heard the person who's going to be... The potential for the largest use of the tonnage fee is saying hey there's a hardship

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:45

because of contractual. So I'm gonna put you on the spot. I'm so sorry to do this playing devil's advocate. If we lose a major customer You said 500, 600,000. What does that mean for the 115? And I'm not defending them either. I think out-of-town should pay a little bit more and but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:00:05

It cuts into the revenue of the landfill quite a bit with the solid waste fund it would be an impact on the solid waste fund for sure. Again it would be partially offset by extending life but that's only partial offset.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:00:24

I think you're still in the ballpark if you only went up half times. If you went up, you would still be less than Tahega significantly and only a little bit more than Santa Maria. You know, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:00:32

don't necessarily disagree. I just don't want to play chicken with a big revenue source through that. Again, I

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:00:38

don't disagree with your hypothesis. It's about 4% of the total revenue of the landfill. Is that accurate?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:00:45

I don't have that. More percent of the total revenue? For just the landfill, I'm not sure. I'm sorry. I think we should just wait. It's like $12-$13 million. Let's not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:00:58

make a decision

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:00:59

right now. Yeah. The whole solid waste fund is... The landfills just want a portion of the solid waste, yeah.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:11

All right, so you guys wanna table it for that or you got no motion? No recommendation? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:01:15

wanna table it.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:18

Table it for how long you wanna table it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:01:22

I'm totally

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:23

fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:28

I don't mind if we have the exact same discussion, I do think there's a few details that were not.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:34

You have something you wanted to know is the percentage of the total. Can you already have an answer on? That we could just charge the bottom line.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:01:45

You can just do with the bottom line 1.5 X and what other

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:48

question were you looking for?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:01:49

It would be interesting to know what the EGSS in Santa Maria is. Well, we know it's in Santa Maria I guess.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:01:55

Tegas is in the report here right here. It's $203.45 a ton.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:05

So just playing this through, what happens if we lose a major customer that that landfill relies on the revenue and we're in the red as a city? Worst case, we have to raise rates on our citizens to make up the difference.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:02:19

Maybe not... No because it's actually less work at the landfill. We still have to take the trash pull it out haul it away. It's less work than they have to do. It is not all profit. It isn't just a profit margin coming in. So it's less oil, it's diesel, all that in doing it. It doesn't just show up and then all of a sudden the money falls out of everybody's pockets. It becomes less work as well so. But likewise too when they're driving up and down our streets you're not getting the reimbursement for them driving on our streets. You know?

A

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:53

couple months I'd love

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:02:54

to have that discussion. This table is open for a couple months okay? Thank you.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:03 – 3:1014 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:03:13

I can be very specific. I am concerned with us digging into the deeper levels of revenue and maintaining revenue, and if we... And I'm not saying it's arbitrary. I'm not saying that 1.5 isn't fair but maybe it's 1.3 or maybe it's 1 .6 but maybe it's based upon maintaining and making sure that if we depend on an outside entity to keep us alive and healthy because we need that revenue to support whatever, and maybe I feel like there's more details that I don't have at the moment. Maybe some deeper

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:03:47

analytics, some more numbers from the surrounding area. Maybe even how many trips that are coming from out of area as well either through the tonnage? Maybe let us know how many trips are coming through up and down the streets. I've heard it is quite a few trucks that are actually going down Olive Avenue that are coming out of the...I know there's a lot of people who come from Yuleton End And Solvang, they come and haul loads into the town. I see quite a few trailers going on 246 in the town as well that are tonnages as well. And I get it but I don't think the city of Lompoc residents should be subsidizing it so just some more analytics to show us what's going on maybe you can even reach out to some of our tonnage people and see if that would trigger something as well.

How about that? Did I get you? Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:04:35

I have a question. You had to do a cost of study for the service that we're providing. Can we have that number back? What's it cost for us to service a truck?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:04:55

So the landfill rates aren't based on cost of service. The collection rates are based on cost of service, but landfill rates are based on the market.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:05:09

When we did our cost to study to pick up everybody's garbage, we had to have some metric that we then took it out to the city, right? Out to the landfill. There had to be some element of that had to be picking it up and hauling it over there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:05:32

We built the landfill rates into our collection rates to determine the cost of collection. The cost at the landfill is just, we were just kind of looking at local landfills and trying to stay competitive.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:05:58

It was based on cost-service but competitive with the surroundings. Anyhow, all right a couple months I guess if somebody else has another question they can throw at you later is that okay? That's fine. All right Council Member Vega are you good with it yep he's good with that. All right table away now item number eight unfinished business Award or rejection of bids for project number fiscal year 2681, radio equipment installation at Watertree and Plant.

Approval of EF Johnson contract change order adoption resolution number 684026. Approving budget appropriation and adjustments for either option one or option two. Craig Deerling, Public Works Director. You're already here. All right thank you. You ready Victor? Is he gone?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:06:56

As you're waiting for Council Member Vega to come back, could I just remind everybody to make sure that you talk into your microphones. Turn on your microphone and when you're moving your head please move your body so that you're on your microphone.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:07:09

You can't do the Aussie? You

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:07:10

have to move your body

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:07:11

because

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:07:12

when you move your head like this it no longer picks up and nobody can hear you okay thank you most people are doing very well.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:07:23

All right, go ahead. You haven't said anything on that. We're not sure if you were still awake.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:07:29

Go ahead. So brief overview of this item. The city needs to upgrade its radio, slant mobile radio system and we have an existing contract to do that with EF Johnson who's discussed in the staff report. That contract was awarded over two years ago in 2024 and in the process of working through It was assumed that the main radio installation site would be at an Allan Hancock College campus up on the hill.

When plans were submitted to the Division of State Architect, they required a seismic upgrade of the building to put these antennas on the roof of the building which was cost prohibitive for the project so the project team developed an alternative location which is at the water treatment plant on top of the tall building there Around the time that design was being finalized, DF Johnson submitted to the city a proposal for a change order.

And the one element of that change order proposal that staff thought was too expensive was the construction at the water treatment plant. So staff separately advertised that construction and received several bids but this, the little bid we're presenting tonight in option one is from Jitney And it is for about $248,000 as opposed to the approximately $570,000 similar outcome through the Johnson option too.

So the City Council there are other actions in each of those items but that's basic decision Councilmember Bould and Councilmember Bridges. I think one reason is that Jitney's a more local company than some of the companies that EF Johnson uses. EF Johnson itself is not a local company and one of their primary subcontractors is also not a local company, so the mobilization costs and their kind of global presence I think is one reason.

There are also, they mentioned some other economies of scale. They mentioned also...

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:10 – 3:1511 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:10:14

Just forgive my ignorance. So staff recommendation is just make a decision. Does staff have a recommendation on what makes sense here in terms of working with the local? Is there a risk to awarding to a company that's not part of the original contract?

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:10:55

But in my opinion, I think that the savings of several hundred thousand dollars can overcome those

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:11:02

risks. I want to commend the staff. It would have been easy just to go with the solution offered, but you guys recognize that it was a little bit of contractors love change orders. So I commend you on that. I have two questions. One's kind of an overall one and one is more technical. Did our building official Maybe I should ask first, are these radios going to be a significant part of our safety response system?

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:55

They will be used by first responders. So the larger contract involves both providing an upgraded system to send and receive signal, and the units that go in vehicles that people carry around including for our police department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:12:16

So did our building officials sign off on the seismic? This whole thing kind of came about because of seismic. And the state has a guy who runs around and says, well you've got to do this if you're going to put that there. But there's a requirement, particularly if it's a significant first responder kind of capability, that a seismic analysis is done and signed off on.

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:12:50

don't believe a seismic analysis has been done for this water treatment plant site. I'm not aware of one being done there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:12:58

I would strongly recommend that we go at least answer that question, whether it's a requirement. I believe it is a requirement. I think it's pretty stringent requirement. So if you will, so I'm not opposed to the option one. I support option one. I just would hate for us to get right in the middle of it and find out oh shoot, we didn't check that box.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:13:23

I guess I should restate that. I believe in the calculations that were submitted for the building permit for the water treatment plant site, all of the necessary building code requirements which would include seismic assessment were performed but I should say that I don't think It's not a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:13:50

weight issue. It's probably a wind and rocking issue, whatever earthquakes are. I still would strongly recommend that be looked at. Mr. Cross, you spread these costs across multiple spots. It looks like several of those are overdrawn. Is there a process where we accept drawing funds from overdrawn So you spread it across water, electric, airport, solid waste and the capital improvement. I think all of those are overdrawn based on the March cash report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:14:54

Yeah, the costs are allocated based on the number of radios each one has so that's how we have to do it. Yes, they're going to... They're struggling to pay for these. But yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:15:10

Okay so Council should be aware that we're spending money that's overdrawn but I support option one if that's the right option and that's what we've got to get because those are my two comments on that.

3:15 – 3:2016 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:15:29

Anybody else?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:15:34

All right. Let me bring to public comment on this item. Anybody on teams or phone?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed3:15:42

No public comment via teams.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:15:45

Seeing nobody run to the podium for public comment, we'll close that and bring it back for council. Motion anybody? Anyone wants to make a motion? What's your motion? In the microphone.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:16:12

You have to turn on your microphone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:16:14

Make the motion that we go with option one.

Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Victor Vega
Show transcript
Motion by Council Member Vegas, seconded by Councilor Starbeck. Let's go ahead and vote. And that passes 5-0. Was there anything else you need to line up with that motion, or is that all you needed? You're good? City Attorney? Good? All right. Cruising along... So... Got a consent calendar, I reviewed it right before. Is it really? Are you sure? I think this is going to be a Mr. Cross question,
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:17:39

So a lot of the vehicles we have are vehicle reserve. This isn't on the list, but it will be funded and depreciated. It'll be funded with user fees and depreciated over its life.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:17:58

So we talked a little bit about 759. It's not coming out of 759?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:18:04

It is coming out of 759. It's one of the two restricted cash accounts in 759? Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:18:14

so I'm not opposed to the truck but again we're flying blind here guys that fund hasn't been touched for three years it's It's supposed to be for a lease buyback. That's what it was approved for, if I understand it correctly. And it's just another example of we're spending money without really knowing where it's coming from. So

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:18:43

I'll make the motion to pass it. It primarily comes from solid waste, is that correct? Yeah. It comes from the rates collected.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:18:52

What's the position of solid waste from?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:18:55

It's gaining right now but it's not.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:19:12

We're going to try to avoid discretionary spending to the negative. So we'll do it, I'll support it but I'm telling you guys, we're flying blind. Our last cash report is March. We have no budget tax rules. We're not going to have them until September maybe and I know Bob's trying to get staff and all of that but we are flying blind is what we're doing. And at some point it's going to come back to get us. It's going to bite us.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:19:41

With ROW being, you're gaining what 900,000 extra a year? Okay. So revenue is exceeding expenditures on that and granted. How old is the replacement on this one? I think he bought it in 19? So you're seven years old?

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:16

I'm just saying that we don't really have the numbers. You have a feel because you've gone off and looked the right way, but if we looked at the funds in a solid way, I don't know what their negative is. I go look at a report and every time I look at it, I go oh my god, we're in trouble because that's what the numbers say.

3:20 – 3:2617 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:20:40

This was budgeted for purchase in 27 because it was at end of life. And I don't have the exact figures, but I believe at some point they start costing more to maintain than a new one would. But I understand.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:21:02

And the point is you and I had a conversation about this fund just today, and you had to admit this fund needs to be reconciled. It's not even correct. And every time I pick up a financial report, I'm dealing six months back and trying to figure out whether what we're doing is smart. A session ago, we just went $1.5 million. There it's gone. I can't get a mural for 50K, but I can take $1.5 million and put it on a skate park.

So at some point we are going to have to get our financials in order. And I'm sympathetic to your challenge. I'm not upset with you. I am just kind of upset. I know you're working your butt off and doing a good job. But I don't know how to make a decision with financials that look like this. And so I'm sitting up here voting away hundreds of thousands of dollars every session, and I have no idea if we have the money.

So I made a motion to take staff's recommendation.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:22:14

Motion by Bridge, seconded by Vega. Do I vote? You want to make it feel good why he spent that money. That passes 5-0. Do you guys want to do it again? Or are we good? All right, oral communications last two minutes for oral communications. Anybody on Teams or phone?

CommentCouncilor StarbeckProposed3:22:57

There is no public comment via Teams.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:23:00

I see nobody says rise for oral communication. We'll close oral communication, bring it back to the council. Council comments and meeting reports. Council Member Volk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:10

Nothing to report. Again this is not necessarily a council request. I just want to put emphasis and if we need to do council requests, I just feel like if we don't have a plan in place for working together, partnering, you know biting our tongue sometimes but taking on it Collaborative approach to the riverbed. Oversight, getting in there and not just assuming that LPD can always do it.

I'd love to have an update on that MOU sometime. And if it's not necessary or we have an alternative plan so be it but that's something I'm...I feel like that's part of the bigger picture of how we're going to take on this challenge long term.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:23:57

You're bringing something back, right? Already on that, city manager?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:24:03

What is it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:03

on? On riverbed stuff. There's an MOU that's been discussed between the county and our police department on managing the river bed. Nothing's moving forward. But maybe there's an update on a different

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:17

approach or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:18

why it doesn't make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:18

sense. Like I said we've been working with them. I mean I would have to get direction from our chief and also from Bill Brown, our sheriff and see if they're willing to make this commitment. I mean, I can...I've been reaching out to them but I can follow up and bring back something that the council will want me to make it part of my city manager report or something.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:37

Even if it's not what we want to hear right? I just feel like that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:40

critical for us to do that. I just wanted to emphasize that we are still partnering together and we're still doing...we just haven't formalized an agreement but we are in discussions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:50

There's nothing formal there's lots of off-ramps so love to see if we can make something formal thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:56

And there's also a lot of different players in there saying, pulling it different ways. But we're working on that. I've been working around that like I said with the county.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:25:08

Council Member Villegas? I just want to bring up one thing. I think with economic development that's coming up, Mary mentioned Spencer's Market coming in and a couple other things on the positive end I'd like to bring up, I've had several people ask me what else can we bring in to have some fun. And I want to bring up the bowling center or the bowling alley type thought process again.

There's a Zotto's type thing over there in Galilee that used to be there and I think we let it die once upon a time because they said that bowling alleys wouldn't be supported but the base has one, Rancho Bull has one I want to bring that thought process up again, okay? To let them know that hey if somebody's out there that would love to invest in Lompoc and bring something like that here. I think people would really embrace that. We need some sort of fun atmosphere. Something larger than life. Something more than just walking up a hill.

So anyway, I wanted to make sure that the public's out there. And I'm going to bring it up again and I'll make a formal probably motion somewhere where we can do a little research on there and do a little outreach. I remember Bealton was going to get one and something crashed on that one so I think Lompoc could be the next one. Thanks for watching. I wanted to bring that up. We want a bowling alley.

It only takes money. Council Member Bridge?

3:26 – 3:2917 turns

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:26:39

No report. Council Member Starbuck?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:26:42

No reports.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:26:46

Back to me, so question for you future Jedi Adam I saw you have the rate of return formula is that going to be on next meeting? We're trying. Come on man, you're killing me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:27:00

Yeah we'll get it

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:27:01

there. I mean we approved it in a budget I just think he should be able to the people should know what I'll be gentle with you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:27:10

Yeah, we'll get it out of there.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:27:11

I just think all the council should see what they approved. The rate of return formula. That's the...I call it a franchise fee on electric. They call it something else but anyhow. So the other thing that I'm asking for to come and it keeps being kicked back and that was the credit card fee that we had, the loss. On that, I'm asking that we discuss this. It just keeps being pushed forward. There's potential ways to recover.

You know how this contract was signed? This is where we lost a million and a half million eight. It just but it just keeps moving so I would like that to come back next meeting if I can get two other people to join with that if you need to do in a split meeting but I want it back next I'm a little concerned we're not going to be able to get that much done.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:34

I mean, there's a lot of stuff. And we can give you an update maybe on some of them. But I know we're putting a lot on the finance when they're down in position. They're doing their financial statements. So who's doing the

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:28:44

time clock discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:45

It's part of HR and Finance. Yes. Maybe we could just do two of them, and we'll bring the next one to the meeting after that.

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:28:54

All right. Give me the rate of return for it, or give me the time clocks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:58

Okay. Which one would you want that to come back next meeting?

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:29:00

Credit card and time clock.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:29:02

Okay, we can do

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:29:03

that. I'll give you the rate of return.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:29:05

Okay, we can do that. Thank

ElectedJim MosbyMayorProposed · by role3:29:06

you. All right. Thank you. I gave you a breathing room. Okay. Thank you. City Attorney wasn't afraid he was ready to do it. All right. Do I get a second? Did you get two head nods on the time clock Councilman Starbuck? It's already been moved. Do you have it down next meeting? It keeps moving. Thank you.