BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 September 15, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:119 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:17

Welcome to the September 15th Lompoc City Council meeting. Roll call, please.

Roll call, called by City Clerk · 1 under review
Show transcript
Council Member Ball? Present. Council Member Bridge? Here. Council Member Vega? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Dirk Starbuck? Present. Mayor James Mosby?
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈19s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:42

President, please stand and join me in invocation for Christine Caldwell. Followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:01

Good evening neighbors And I say neighbors because we are neighbors. And I was thinking about the diversity of being neighbors and what we're trying to do together, and so I looked at this and I thought about what could we do for the betterment of our community? And number one, come to this meeting! Be a part of consultation is a powerful deed. And so I thought but how do we do this daily?

And how do we start a day? And so I came across this spiritual quote and it said, you have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your traditions. Made me think. It's from Mark 7 chapter seven verse nine. I was like okay that's a strong way but I need this help. And it said well how should I finish my day? Okay and I came across this quote it said bring thyself to account each day.

Ere thou art summoned to a reckoning, for death unherald shall come upon thee and thou shall be called to give account for thy deeds." And that's from a book called The Hidden Words. So then I'm thinking okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:12

then how do I do this daily? And I found seven words that really motivated me and they said let deeds not words be your adorning and that's from a book called The Hidden Words. So I have a wish for you all that I came across, not just for me but for all and it said my prayer for you is that your spiritual faculties and aspirations may daily increase. And that you will never allow the material senses to veil from your eyes the glories of heavenly illumination And so I thought then the results, if we keep doing these things daily. I like this quote and I thought it's where are we trying to get? What's the end product? It said your utmost desire must be to confer happiness on each other.

Each one must be the servant of the others, thoughtful of their comfort and welfare. In the path of God one must forget entirely himself. You must not consider your pleasure but seek the pleasure of others. And you must not desire glory or gifts or bounty for yourself, but seek these gifts for your blessings of your brothers and sisters. This is from a book called Joy and Radiance. So brothers and sisters let's continue in the wonderful way we're working to build a beautiful community show people how much we love it and how much we love each other. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:39

Please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:40

show me the Pledge Allegiance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:42

Ready? Begin. Good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:12

evening, Mayor and members of the Council.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:24

Announcing that the city's radio station KPEG is off air, not broadcasting tonight. There's an issue with the repeater antennae but all other options of observing the Council meeting are still available and working and that's TAP TV, the live webcast online and Teams. I wanted to take a moment to thank our fire department for hosting the annual 9-11 Flag Lowering and Moment of Reflection last Friday morning. This tradition brought together community members and staff in a moment of solemn reflection to honor the memory, courage, and sacrifice of many on 9-1-1.

I'd like to remind everyone that the Parks and Recreation is hosting a free seniors prom this year. Local seniors ages 50 and up are invited to put on their dancing shoes and head to the Dick DeWeese Center next Saturday, September 26th from 5 to 7.30 p.m.. This free community event will be an evening of fun, music, dancing, and socializing. There'll be a live DJ and refreshments served throughout the evening. For more information please contact Sue Slavens at the Parks and Recreation Division.

Additionally, early registration is now open for youth basketball. This program runs from November through February and is $200 for residents and T20 for non-residents at the early bird price. Saturday's registration events will be held at the Anderson Rec Center on September 19th, September 26th, and October 3rd. And youth from the ages of four through eight grade are encouraged to register, and this is a very popular program that the I'd like to share that there will be an upcoming parks community workshop on Monday, September 21st from 630-830 here in the Council Chamber. The workshop will provide an opportunity for residents to share their ideas and help shape a vision for the future of three local parks. Input regarding the Riverbend Park, Ryan Park and Jam Park is welcome.

Community members also are welcome to share their priorities for these parks. And then input from the workshop will be used in supporting future improvements and park amenities. Community input at the workshop is invaluable in supporting the development of a vision for these parks that will best reflect the interests of the local community Community members of all ages are welcome to attend. Future park projects guided by the input received at this community workshop may be supported in parts by grants from Proposition 4, so for more information about the workshops please contact the Parks and Recreation Division.

The second community workshop for the general plan update will be held in conjunction with the parks input workshop on Monday September 21st from 630 to 830. Community members are welcome to share insights into what they envision for the future of Lompoc. Facilitated discussions regarding future land use, population capacity and future developments will be held. Residents can learn more about the general plan by visiting EnvisionLompoc.com And then I'm excited to announce that the library is hosting a special Books and Bubbles event with the United Way next Friday, September 25th. Community members are invited to celebrate Dolly Day as the day of next Friday's event is 9-5.

Community members will be available to learn about and enroll their children in the Dolly Parton Imagination Library. And that's all I have tonight. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed11:04

Anybody got questions for City Manager?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:07

For the fill-in? Fill-in.

0:11 – 0:167 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed11:18

All right, we got off easy. It's a public comment on consent calendar this is consent calendar

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed11:29

Mayor, I have an announcement to make about the consent calendar. Item number two is the city's check register. There is at least one check in there from the city to the Lompoc Valley Chamber of Commerce. The Lompoc Valley Chamber of Commerce is a source of income to Councilmember Starbuck and therefore he will recuse himself from voting on that only those checks in item number two.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed11:58

We have 10 items on the consent calendar. Item number one is approval of the minutes for June 2nd, 2026 meeting. Number two is approval ratification expenditures payroll August 14th $2.197 million and a voucher register August 10th through 14th of five million $85,000 and another voucher is 17th through 21st of August 2026 at 2.2 million. Number three is adoption of ordinance number 1750-26 exempting permitted recreational vehicles from a 72 hour street parking limit prohibiting those RVs from parking in the same location for 30 more consecutive days and extending the enforcement window for 72 hour parking relations from 48 hours to 14 days and adoption ordinance number Making it a misdemeanor to violate the ordinances governing camping and the use of transit facilities.

Number four is adoption of Ordinance No. 1752-26, approving a First Amendment to Development Agreement with WH River Terrace 257 LLC Williams Homes for a river terrace project north of the intersection east of Laurel Avenue north of 12th Street DA 2026-0001 Number five is adoption of Ordinance No. 1753-26 amending Lompoc Muni Code, Chapter 17.316 to modify the regulations on feather signs in nonresidential zones TA 2026-0001.

Number six is adoption of Resolution 684926 amending the Conflict of Interest Code. Number seven is approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a lease agreement with American Aerospace Technologies Inc for use of the maintenance hangar at Lompoc Airport. Number eight is approval of sole source purchase contract with play and park structures for the long-awaited Westvale Park playground equipment as part of the Healthy Kids Initiative grant. Number nine is award of a consultant service agreement for project number CS24S-4, City of Lompoc Safe Streets for All Action Plan and authorize the city manager to execute the agreement.

Number 10 is adoption of resolution number 6845, parentheses 26. Approving amendment number three to the Lompoc Police Officers Association MOU 2025-2027 to provide special assignment pay for community service officer drone at first responder pilot duties increased medical premium contributions and provided by the city and approving supplemental appropriations as consent calendar. I had just one request if you could put up number eight's Playground structure.

Yay! We should be all excited about that. Westville Park's getting a great upgrade. It's been a long journey, right? Long journey on that one and that is through a grant. That's a good one. The

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed15:27

Then the park will be fully an inclusive park, so it's more than the 20%. And we will once approved then we will go out to RFP for the installation of the equipment and the safety surfacing. So as soon as that closes then we'll be coming back to council to award the project for that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:52

Very good. Anybody have questions? Public comment on this consent calendar, we'll see nobody rise for that. Anybody on Teams or phone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed16:03

There is no public comment via Teams or phone call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed16:07

Okay. Seeing nobody rise for a public comment, bring it back to the Council. Do you have a quick question to pull any items?

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed16:13

Pull item 10 please. Pulling item number 10 okay. That will be heard at the end of the meeting Right before the second oral communications, item number 10. So we're looking for a motion or anything else on the other nine items? Anybody? We have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed16:43

motion by Paul. What do you got? To accept

0:16 – 0:343 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed16:46

consent calendar without item number ten and with recusal from Mr. Starbuck. Okay. Seconded by Council Member Vega. Let's go ahead and vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed17:04

Council Member Vega? Pushed it. It's going to be one of those nights. There you go. And that passes 5-0, item number 10 coming towards the end of the meeting. Takes us on down to staff presentations, announcements, requests. Presentations from the Finance Department regarding The current employee time and attendance tracking system possible conversion to Tyler Technologies new time management system.

Matt Adams, Accounting and Revenue Manager

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed18:05

So the issue of time clocks and the status updates, we've had them a couple times now. And at the August 18th meeting it was requested that I bring back what I learned from the Tyler State User Group meeting down in Laguna Beach and that's what I'm here to do. I'm going to start with a brief history of how we've got here and where we're going forward from there. How the current system works, I know that question came up at the last meeting.

The time in attendance is the name of the new module that Tyler Technologies is using going forward for the time clocks as well as into the new system when we eventually get there. And then my final thoughts. So for the brief history, again as of April 21st in 2026 it was requested and we brought back or brought to the council and presented the initial implementation for time clocks.

We also presented estimated costs at that time. It's been noted that the estimated costs have increased since April and I will be covering this later in the presentation in more detail You can see the initial cost there. We estimated that with the implementation of the software and the licenses, with the implementation hardware and proximity readers which were tablets two per at most times it was two per location for employees to sign in. And then an estimated total of 18 readers and the annual fee was about $119,000-$124,000 If you go back to the previous presentation, I do want to make a note that I included 6,647 in those two totals. So if you were to compare them to the previous presentations, the numbers will be off by that amount but I added that in for the first year because it's also something we have to pay in the first year.

And then on August 18th, Management Services Director Bob Cross presented the status update. And in those meetings it was noted that the MOU with IBEW now requires us to do a meet and confer before we can implement this. IAFF has their MOU is still effective through 2027. Time clock discussions will be a part of those negotiations and LPOA has not expressed an interest in negotiating as of that meeting in 2018.

So now with our current system, I would like to point out so it's worth noting that time of attendance as I mentioned is the name of the time management module. So when I talk about that, that's what I'm referring to. So the current system that we have for non-exempt employees, so this would be your hourly employees not managers not supervisors, they log into what we call employee self service or ESS.

They will go in and they enter the number of hours worked each day. So this is on a per-day basis, it's not like they put in the number of hours they work so if they work eight hours, they put in an eight. If they work six, they put six, seven and a half, whatever the case may be, whatever they work, they enter that in per day. And then that'll all be totaled up at the end of the pay period and sent to payroll. This also includes any vacation, sick, accrued time, furlough. Any to that effect it's all recorded within the system. It is not on paper. It is not signed off with pen and paper. It's all electronic. Everything is stored in that system and it's easily accessible by the payroll department or division. No group.

Once that time sheet is completed, like I said they're sent over to their supervisor or manager for review and approval. It is the manager's or supervisor's job to make sure that the hours that they are presenting for whether they were worked, vacation, sick, whatever the case may be, that those were accurate. And then the manager or supervisor, once they've insured that will approve it and send it to payroll. If there's any errors or discrepancies they confer with that employee to make sure what happened and you know what the discrepancy is and then get it fixed before it gets to payroll. There is a method to fix it afterwards but we try to avoid that as much as possible After the manager or supervisor approves it, like I said, it goes electronically to payroll staff in finance.

They import it and review all the timesheets. They don't review it for accuracy as much as making sure that all of the sick time doesn't go over their banked hours, their vacation doesn't go over banked hours, things like that. And then once they do that, they pull it into the payroll module which then runs it through the warrant register. And that's what processes everything and calculates everybody's time over time, standby pay all that stuff and sends it on through.

Exempt employees, Mr. Bridge had mentioned this in the meeting on 818, exempt employees do not enter their time. We do not put in the number of hours that we work because at the end of the day we're paid the same whether we work 30 hours a week or 100. So what we do enter is our time off so if we take a vacation day or sick day or whatever the case may be that we have available to us, we do log those hours and those are recorded within the system But we do not log hour by hour or you know how many hours we worked in that day, it would throw out. It currently throws off the system that Tyler has set up in place for the payroll module. Mr Bridget mentioned the job costing I think he would call them Charge codes at the time. We don't track job costing within the payroll module that is handled separately in public works, they track it all on their worksheets.

They do submit those to payroll but those are not tracked within the payroll system itself, those are added separately. So when people are paid, it's paid by the budget schedule that is approved at the budget time which this person is allocated to this fund, this fund, this fund by these percentages we don't do job costing within that. So then moving forward, now we're going to talk about what I learned down at the state user group down in Laguna and how this is going to look going forward.

So the thing that I attended as I said was Tyler Technology State User Group. While I was down there, we talked about the new module as well as some other new features that are coming which I'm not going to get into today and the mobile version of the time clocks. Essentially what it's going to boil down to is they are the same as what we have now, but they have new features that I actually am kind of excited about.

So they provide exact time in-out tracking records. This is what's been talked about multiple times. Council has wanted it. I can agree with it. It literally tracks by the hour and minute when they clocked in, sorry, when they clock in, when they clock out and that is all tracked by that. Currently again, we only do it by total hours within the day The next thing is called advanced scheduling. This is another interesting feature, and I can see it having some use within the city.

Primarily, I'm thinking PD, fire, parks and rec, library, aquatic center, maybe the utilities? I'm not sure but what advanced scheduling allows us to do is we can post the actual schedules for people who aren't 9-5 Monday through Friday. They can post the shifts. This would allow the employees to then go in and if they are assigned a shift, they see it. But if there's an open shift, say there's an event coming up and nobody was scheduled for this, the department can post it. The employee can go in and say yes I accept that. And then they pick up that shift. If they need to trade a shift, say they need the day off or whatever, they can trade the shift within the app as well. Or within the module itself so that is a really nice feature I like.

It depends on how we would implement that. The next thing allows for remote clock-in and clock-out using the Workforce mobile app, which is the name of Tyler's mobile app that they've rolled out. It does allow us to, as previously mentioned, geofencing and geolocation. What this means is when we would set up the fences—we being IT and payroll and staff—we would set up where they can clock in and out from.

When they do so and they use the mobile app, it'll automatically log where they're located. If they're outside that geofence we can have it set to do one of two things. It can either warn them that they're outside the geofence or it can completely block them from logging in or clocking in rather from outside that geofence. We can set up more than one. We can say city hall, PD, firehouse, one and two like we can set up all the different geofences or we can have it set for the whole city.

That's the interesting thing with that. There is gonna be a little more on that when I get to that The app would also allow us to do remote timesheet submissions to the supervisor and manager, and also allows for remote approval. So if we have a manager that's at a conference for whatever reason, and their staff member submits their timesheet but they don't have their laptop in front of them, they can still review it. They get all of these same information. They would see the hours that they've worked. The time off that they're requesting, how much they have in their bank. All that stuff they would see everything in perfect detail as if they were sitting at the computer and they can approve it or reject it back to the employee for fixing.

This however all of that fun and awesome features does come with a few caveats. The first one is and I know it's been asked before about salaried staff Salaried staff is not able to log in and log out using the system because the issue that comes up is, for a perfect example, I clock in at 8 o'clock today. We're going to be here through the council meeting till whenever it ends.

That's going to be well over my eight hours per California code. Anything over eight hours in a day or 40 hours in a week is overtime, I'm exempt from overtime that means my staff and payroll has to go back and back out those hours and they won't be reflected in my time card to make it back to the 40 hours so it's gonna look like I worked 8-5 That defeats the entire purpose of what we wanted to do with that. So, that's what Tyler calls salary policy. We would go in and we would set up all the supervisors or managers they're here 8 a.m. to noon or whatever time they want to take their lunch. They're back in out of lunch at this time and then they worked until 5, 6 whatever their end schedule is totaling 40 hours. That schedule will then be populated every week every day for every week One of the things that came up in our discussions was with that geolocation and geofencing, employees have two options.

They can use a city-issued cell phone or they can use their own cell phone. Staff would strongly recommend that we use city issued cell phones because one of the bigger reasons on it is the geolocation and geotracking needs to have location shared. I know personally, I don't like sharing that With my, on my personal device I don't like sharing my location because that's going to be picked up by an advertiser and that's going to be sold. I don't want my data sold and I know what my city or my staffs you know the employees of the cities information being sold on a city phone so that's one reason we do highly recommend or strongly recommend that we would have to give everybody who needs remote login and logout a city issued cell phone That does come with also needing iOS 15 plus and Android 13 plus to work.

So if we had an older cell phone that isn't able to upgrade to those, then they're going to have to get upgrades which means as we go forward they're also gonna have to get replacement upgrades on those phones as well. You went way too far. So then at the end of the day, the concerns about the liability issues for employees I share that. I really do. We should have that accountability to be able to report and accurately say this person was not on city time and God forbid they got into an accident 100% I agree with that. That is something we definitely need to have at some level somehow.

However, and as I mentioned the time and attendance app or module offers a lot of incredibly useful tools and features. I stressed that in the beginning like I'm really excited for it and I think it has a lot of usability and a lot of reportability in it. However, it does not address council's current concerns around salary staff time tracking because again we can't do it by the hour. It would be just a set schedule and then the supervisors would have to maintain that schedule but let's face it some of us work well over The point is we can't change that on a day-to-day. It's set as a schedule, we can't change it or clock in and out for OT purposes.

The timesheet attendance and approvals are still subject to the supervisor's managers. It is still their responsibility at the end of the day to make sure that their employee is working the hours that they claim, that they're using vacation time when they're on vacation or sick time when they're on sick. It is still their responsibility. This module isn't going to solve that.

It's the system still pushes it through for approval. We're still at the same spot where who is approving it, so it doesn't provide for any more or less accountability than what's currently offered. So as I mentioned, there's nothing that would prevent time and attendance for some other forms of misuse. Not saying any of these happen. These are just big examples. But there's nothing preventing somebody from clocking in on their computer and going to Starbucks for three hours and working on a manuscript. Your check and verification on that is the manager that's sitting there approving their timesheet. You're still at the same spot. This system isn't going to provide that.

That would still come down to an internal HR investigation, whoever else will be involved in that. The responsible parties would then be handled in accordance to the policy and procedures manual. And the previously reported cost did not include the cost needed to buy city cell phones for those employees that we need to have access to remote in time of attendance, so that's going to increase that initial 119 to 127,000 by how many of our cell phones we need to buy on top of having to replace those every couple years just Operating systems and I mean, I'm sure everybody here's broken a cell phone at one point in their time We know that our utility workers might drop a phone and it gets shattered now We got to replace it even sooner than that that happens.

So those are costs we also need to keep in consideration so the end of the day My opinion on all this is that right now? I don't feel this is a good use of taxpayer funds We don't have it budgeted in the general fund. We could pull it from there But now we're shorting the general fund While I do agree and share those liability concerns with the off time and the ability to track work time by the, and provide better accountability for the hours worked.

Implementing the system doesn't address the concerns as I previously mentioned. This would be a very large expense for a problem that we don't really have at the moment. We have rumors of and we've heard about it, but nothing's been founded. There's nothing saying there's any major issues that would warrant that kind of an expense at this time. I did like a lot of the features.

I want to stress it. I loved a lot of the features, but I feel like at the end of the day Tyler Technologies is recommending that the city move to what's known as SaaS or software-as-a-service also known as cloud based software instead of our current on premises software We've asked and are working with them to schedule this for the 2029 budget cycle, to ensure that we have enough funding to cover this conversion. And that conversion is going to run anywhere between six months and a year already.

To add this module onto that, we would be doing that same six months now, and then have to turn around still do the additional six months in 2029 when we convert the whole enterprise ERP system over. So with that in mind, I feel it's best to consider not adding time and attendance until that time when we can better budget for it. And instead trying to use funds that in the general fund...

I'm tripping over my own words. When we can budget for them better instead of trying to use funds that the general fund just doesn't have currently. So with that, I'm open any questions and comments?

0:34 – 0:4019 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed34:41

It sounds like you have a solution coming down here shortly anyways It seems like a logical movement. I still think that when we're sending people out in the utilities at all hours of the night, that we should have a better way of logging for them and making sure they are getting paid everything they should be getting paid when they are out there in the middle. There are other apps that can go along on the phone Out there in the environment out there, they might you know getting that time accuracy many times is the least of their concerns.

I know we've enhanced the support by I think water. We can go with two people out there now and they're out the middle of the night right? That's correct. We do have to on standby which is good for them too but I think being able to have more of the accountability aspects, and it's not just about a trust component as well as... I actually had... I'm not going to pick on him because he's not here.

Somebody was showing me their time sheet and was bragging to the level of the time sheet, you know, come look, come look. I go, nah, I'm not worried, don't come look. And they'd accidentally put a day in that they were there that they actually took the day off so accidents happen. They do. My objective is to move into the 21st century. I'd agree you don't have a budgetary aspect right now, but I'll let these other questions come. But I think Tyler's already coming up with a solution for most of the problems already in the future.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed36:22

So Council Member Ball? I say this tongue-in-cheek, don't aren't we flush in the general fund? Don't we have plenty of money to take care of this. Thank you for that just curious on the cell phone additions have you guys estimated how many is it 10 or 100 or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed36:38

haven't even gotten haven't even gotten to that point some of our utility staff already have them so i don't know how many more would need them or which versions they're on that isn't something i currently have access to um i could request it but I was just curious and again that cost would be over

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed37:23

I feel like this is the, on a staff level and department head level, you know if you guys are controlling your own time and your own destiny. The only thing that I can say is some of these systems that have been integrated or integrated for the ease of use with the department heads and the employees such as scheduling time off or you know, the time clock issue. I don't know about the mobile app from my experience, those mobile apps that allow Thank you.

If there's not a large issue here or there is any issue, then I think the money can be better used in other resources. You guys have a timekeeping system which keeps the employees accountable and you probably have a request On your mobile app, is there some sort of mobile way that they can request time off and sick leave and stuff? Not

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed38:29

at this point. They'd have to log into ESS on any internet connected device.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed38:33

They can't do that but that would be for the ease of use for the employee also. And the other things I know of through my experience is sometimes it's Timekeeping is something that you guys would deem money saving or cost saving through HR because if the timekeeping system is also integrated with HR then it's, I'm not trying to say but I mean it could have a dual use there. If you did have an issue so thanks again for your presentation. I just think it should be on your end and staff end and your department heads to keep track of time for the employees and I'm glad we don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:11

That's exactly my point too. That's it? My

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:20

suggestion is you bring it back in two years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:25

When

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:26

Tyler's coordinating it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:28

You mean three years?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:29

Three years, well two and a half, whatever

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:32

it is. I'm sure it'll be brought

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:33

back. You have a prior to on the budgetary components.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:35

We'd have to bring it back then because we're going to be going into the SAS version so it's gonna have to have a whole

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:39

limitation cost. It seems like a logical thing that down the road why spend the money now if you're just gonna yank it all out So it seems like you have, Tyler's got something down the road for you. Did you have a good, where did you go for this educational

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:52

conference? I was down in Laguna Beach. It was kind of cold, or cold in the evening and warm during the day but no it was good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:01

Very good thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed40:01

Thank you.

0:40 – 0:469 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:12

Mr. Cross your end Audit Timeline and General Fund Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as of September 3rd, 2026. Mr. Cross.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed40:24

Good evening Mayor, Council Members. This is the very preliminary numbers for fiscal year 25-26 and where we are right now. So the audit timeline In June, we turned off all the P cards and closed the warehouse for inventory and did our first week of field work with the auditors. And the fiscal year ended June 30th. Since then, so July and August is called the accrual period for revenues and expenses.

That's when we everything that comes in for revenues and expenses we have to decide whether it related to last fiscal year or this fiscal year. So expenses we can do pretty much automated for at least through invoices and salary those are done um just by separate check runs through munis revenues are done manually and we don't start until after august 31st because anything that comes in before august 31st has to be evaluated separately so that means that expenses are going to be a little more accurate than revenues but There are a lot of expenses that aren't in yet either. So September we're going to do revenue accruals, we're just starting that and we have closing journal entries and we have to evaluate every fund to determine what closing entries have to be done each individual fund.

And audit work fieldwork starts October 12th so we've got a little less than a month to finish a lot of stuff. And then November, December we resolve any audit requests. We prepare the financial statements. We write the MD&A, Managed Discussion Analysis and January will be out here to present the Act for the Council and submit the audit by January 31st. And then we have a single audit, which relates to federal grants. And we have a separate audit that has to be submitted by March 31st for that. So that's the rundown of the audit schedule for...

That's pretty standard for us every year with little change with dates of the audit. So now going into the numbers. So this is as of September 8th what we had in actual revenues booked You see our revenues, our short budget by about 4.4 million. Doing again brief analysis on what came in July and August we got about 1.2 million in sales tax, we got about 1. 2 million in transaction tax We have about $900,000 in property tax and we have about a month's worth of TOT. That was a couple hundred thousand. So that's going to get us a lot closer to where our budget revenue is but we're going to be probably a little short expense wise. All the departments currently are under budget.

They're close but again they're under. We really came in pretty good as far as our actuals compared to our budget. And so that's with the general fund, now I will say and this goes for utilities too, I want to recap again these are preliminary numbers they're going to change a lot before the final numbers. Items we still have not been posted are A lot of the tax revenues that I rattled off, but they're not in these numbers. Fixed assets have not been finished. Depreciation has not been run yet.

Fund analysis for each general fund or the various enterprise funds has not happened yet. Inventory entries haven't been done yet. We've done the inventory, the entries have not been posted yet. We have leases, deferrals and subscription-based items that we have to recognize those will be expenses. Pension and OPEB post employment benefits have not been posted yet.

And the utility accounts receivable which when we get to utilities I'll show you that those have not been posted yet so Bills that went out in July have not been posted back to June yet, so that's missing revenue there. So with that we're going to unless there are any questions on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed45:09

It's real fast so you've got 4.4 million and the negative what do you estimate? And I know it's a it's a tough thing but we're gonna clear up How far off of a balanced budget do you think we'll be?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed45:27

So with the revenues, we might be short by about $1 million from what we budgeted. It's hard to tell for sure but that's just based on again going through receipts for about a week. That's just the numbers I wrote down I think it would be about maybe a million short. There may be other things that have come in that I haven't found yet, so that's what the next month is going to be doing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed45:58

And that's off of budgeted correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed46:00

Yes, that's off of budget.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed46:02

In expenses you're not gonna see a significant increase in the actual expenses?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed46:09

No, I think as far as budgeted revenues to expenses we're gonna come in pretty close, I think. We might be, our revenues may be a little under expenses. We did have about $1 million, over $1 million last year that we put into reserves and a lot of that was capital items that didn't get done last year that are done this year. So we, of that million, we may have spent some of that on those capital items so it's just really too hard to tell at this point but...

But that's my best guess.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed46:48

All right, Council Member Bridge?

0:46 – 0:5529 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed46:55

So I think obviously you've done a lot of work on this and I appreciate that. On the expense side if we could look at that chart, It's confusing to me. really a variance that's got different dates associated with it. Am I understanding that correctly? If we take the 18.4 versus the 17, just take that line right there. When is the orange line two? What's the date associated with that orange

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed47:42

line? So that's gonna be all salaries. It's going to be most of expenses that were paid through August that related last year But there's things that aren't in there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed47:54

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed47:55

so it's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed47:57

as of August not and when is the blue line?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:03

That was the budgeted amount for the full year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed48:08

Okay, so we're kind of comparing apples and oranges

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:10

there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed48:12

Somebody could look at that and say oh my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:14

gosh,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed48:14

we're way under budget but That's not really what that chart says. We modify the budget. I don't know if that's the right technical term. Is this the amended budget or the original budget?

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:40

This is the amended budget. So,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed48:42

this is the amended budget. Yes. So if one said August what does that...I guess it's three months or something behind

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:55

Well, it's through the end of the fiscal year. It's just there are entries we have to do that have to finalize the work but it's really expenses through and that's why I mentioned earlier the expenses are going to be closer than the revenues because a lot of those we can recognize when we pay them what fiscal year they are. The revenues, we have to do that manually

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed49:20

So the revenues are not really accruals in the sense of you've put them in the books and you're looking for a variance at the end of the year. You just haven't had chance to put them in the books yet?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed49:31

Right, yeah exactly we start September 1st so the revenues are going to be at least a month short in some cases two months.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed49:39

Okay so I guess on a personal level is this Are we going to come back next week or next month and say, oh you've had your budget to actual reports? Because this is certainly not a budget to actual report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed49:57

Well it's too preliminary to do one. We'll have better numbers beginning of October when the auditors come but this is what we, this is the best we have right now because we're just starting closing work

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed50:13

Well, I think we're kind of getting hoisted on our own petard in the sense that we're looking for perfection and you're not going to report until you have perfection. And so what that means is we're, I don't know, what is it? Fifteen months into a 24-month period and we don't have a clue It's We're well into year two and we have not had one report. Our cash reports, I think March was the last cash report we had.

Pardon?

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed51:06

You should've made May by now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed51:08

Okay, I don't think I've seen that when I went to look online. I thought the last one was March but it's significantly behind so it's not a current... We just continue to fly blind and we spend money without knowing And we could be coming here at the, I guess the final budget and get told none of the reserves we were hoping for are booked. So I love the report but it's a classic example of a report with really cool data but the information is not there that's required to run a business so thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed51:54

I'm just curious, and for some of the folks in the room and maybe to refresh my memory too. Can you articulate – can you go back to the slide that shows the Bradley Burns and the sales tax there? So just quickly, so one says sales tax and the other one says the 1%. Can you describe the difference between those two taxes so we kind of understand what those are?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed52:17

Sure so this the sales tax the Bradley burns that is 1% of actual sales. I think the original tax rate was 7.75%, of which 6.75% goes to the state, and the city gets 1% of it, and that's the Bradley Burns amount. And then in 2020, the city passed a Measure I, which added 1% to the sales tax rate so it went to 9 points, excuse me 8.75%. And we track that separately. That's for public safety, and it's for paying down the pension liability. So we track them separately. We receive them separately. They're both 1% of purchases so they're usually relatively close. There are some things that apply to one but not the other but that's what those are.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed53:22

Thank you for that. I'm just curious now, you said there's still revenue to come in and some numbers will change obviously. Do we see those percentage differences on those top two lines changing dramatically or staying close to that negative number?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed53:35

So in July and August for both of them we got about 1.2 million and that'll be accrued back to June. I think that's all we're going to have so they're gonna fall a little short of what we budgeted but I think it's a little bit more than what we received last year So it's just we didn't increase as much as we had thought we would.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed53:58

Yeah, I guess that just leads to my question you know is we're trying to extrapolate what does this mean? What is it showing on the ground? How was our local economy etc.? Is this telling us anything about our local economy or it's just we over projected and were underwhelming ourselves a bit?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed54:12

We have quarterly calls with our sales tax representatives and it's kind of in line with what they're saying. We're going to be increasing but slowly, you know in the 2-3% in the next year they expect also so The fact this lower, well I think it's increased from last year but it's not as much as we'd expected. I don't have the actual numbers in front of me.

but we did increase it just a small increase from last year. So I know there's some businesses that are coming that hopefully will increase it in the current year, and they are cautiously optimistic that we'll be seeing a little bit more of an increase in 27, but a lot of those haven't opened yet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed55:04

Speaking to that, does this show us that perhaps we were too optimistic in our projections?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed55:11

Perhaps. A lot of it we get directly from our consultants, it's not us putting numbers in. We kind of work with them on it but yeah it looks like we fell a little short of where we thought we would but close I mean you know it's 6.8 million instead of 6.9 that's within a few percent. Thank you for that.

0:55 – 1:1217 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:41

Okay, utilities.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed55:43

All right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed55:51

And this will be shorter because I've already said all the disclaimers on the numbers I did. It's going to be the same disclaimers on the utility funds with one big difference in that in the revenues you see everything is down. Revenues are lower than we budgeted Like I said, we have one month the month of July bills are not in here yet. So that revenue Hasn't been counted, which one month is about 8% of a year. So we're a little bit short maybe. I think there's gonna be some parts of August bills that will be accrued back to June so... We're a little short on our revenue budget but it's not 10-15% short.

And on the expense side again everything is lower. A lot of the We're going to be looking at some of the other costs that came in. Those aren't in yet either. But it's at least encouraging that for, except for water the revenues at this point are greater than the actual expenses but again there's a lot of things that still have to be accounted for so it's too early to be too optimistic.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction57:27

Mr. Cross, the accounts receivable, I know we're looking at this real early but are we... is there a significant number in the accounts receivable that would change these and the payment plans?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed57:41

So with the accounts receivable itself, that's already booked as revenue. Whether we collect it from customers or not, it still counts as revenue so that's more on the cash reports where if we're getting the cash or not getting the cash. The only The item that would affect this would be if we, through our credit counselors determined there was a greater number of uncollectible accounts. That would get booked as expense and it would increase these expenses but that's not usually too large of a number year over year Now that we're kind of past some of the worst of COVID times, so I don't expect that to impact the revenues versus expenses a lot. And I know the payments have been coming in. I think for awhile the receivables had been dropping quite a bit.

So I haven't looked at it through June but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:43

Any other

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed58:44

questions? My only suggestion is, as you've done here, as you progress on each year, maybe try to put the numbers together so you can see where we are. Is this spot in time? And it'll tell you a little bit more. I know you're new in your seat up there but that would give some history of the lumpiness of revenues and expenses.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed59:09

For sure. We can build upon this in future years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed59:15

All right. You got some else, Council Member Bull? So just curious, just so we all know, so these are preliminary numbers a lot of this might change. We're making judgments off of this that's not accurate because a lot might change. So when will we know the final numbers put a stamp on it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed59:29

We should be submitting numbers to the auditors in October and again in November we should have preliminary...we should be working on the preliminary financials. So that would be a...we should have a fairly close I would like to see the numbers by

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed59:45

then. Something I'd be curious and I actually agree with you some sort of point time would be helpful in the future, but I'd love to see this exact same thing, but in November with updated numbers so I can compare the two. That'd be great for me. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed59:58

Sure. Yeah well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:00:00

maybe by mid-December you might have that act for done right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:00:04

Huh? Maybe?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:00:09

I get another question for you. Who's doing the next one? Review of credit card merchant fees.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:25

I'm back!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:00:37

What am I doing wrong here? Hey, now it's working. All right similar to the previous one we're going to start with a brief history and then I have some slides on putting the math together on the credit card fees as well as what we reduced or how we reduced it and what was reduced and then the final thoughts So, back in 2016 when the contract was set up between Tyler Technologies and us to implement Tyler Enterprise ERP or at the time it was Tyler Munis.

The contract existed between OpenEdge and Tyler Technologies for credit card processing. There were others, and I'll get into that in a moment, that were available to us. And there's reasons why we didn't go with those. The city was assured at the at that time that the merchant fees were going to be held low so the decision was made by then City Treasurer Dean Albro not to pass those charges on to the utility customers. We were told that all of the credit card fees were going to be held low and he wanted to offer that as a savings to utility customers When Finance was preparing the ACFR in 2024, or Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, the director at the time and I noticed that Finance, or Treasury, was coming in at about $438,737 over budget.

That threw off some alarm bells and we went and did some more digging on it. And we realized that even in 23, we were over but that one wasn't even barely 100,000. So that year didn't set off any alarms but in 24, it did. So then we sat down and I contacted our client advocate at Global Payments which is also known as OpenEdge and I referred them as OpenEdge from this point forward.

Contacted them in 2025 and asked to do a rate review. When we went through that, it was about a three-month process. We worked with them and they explained what we were being charged for, what they can adjust, what they can't. And then we went from there to try and negotiate it. We actually went through three different rounds of hey here's our offer, no we don't like that, what can you do better? Here's another offer. So we went three rounds before we landed on one that actually did what we were hoping to do.

At the time OpenEdge was increasing their fees annually But the issue was is that they weren't notifying the city. They were notifying Tyler Technologies because they have the contract with them, but they weren't notifying us so we didn't catch it in time until we noticed that the ACFA was over budget. So then as I said, we negotiated with them over the course of three months from February to April 2025 and that's how we got to where we are.

Again with the brief history back in 2016, we entered into contract with Tyler Technologies, not OpenEdge Part of that contract included Tyler cashiering, which is what we use at the counter for our utility customers as well as business tax licenses or BTCs and planning payments building payments things like that. Everything done at the front counter is Tyler cashiering.

We do also have Other payment processors, so I know it was mentioned at the previous meeting that Bank of America or U.S. Bank and we do actually have merchant fees through Bank of America as well for our off-site credit card receipts. So that would be at both libraries, at the Anderson Rec Center, at...I had a note here. So those ones do accept credit cards and those go through Bank of America because those systems are not tied into Tyler Cashiering.

So that was the biggest reason why we ended up with OpenEdge was for Tyler Cashiering, the other reason that we ended up with for them as you can see there is customer portal being able to offer our utility customers the ability to pay online and not have to come in OpenEdge and BridgePay were the only two that offered us the ability to do that in 2016. We talked to other cities, and those cities came back and said that they preferred OpenEdge to BridgePAY because BridgePAY had some issues and they ended up switching afterwards anyways. I don't have a whole lot of detail on that because that was way before me.

Um, the other thing is those who also on top of the customer portal also are the only ones that had chip readers at the payment or the POS system so they would read the chip. We wanted that for security for our customers using credit cards. So those that limited us to those two options we went for what we were recommended by other cities as the one to go for.

Fast forward to now As a current review of all this, there are still only two options that work with Tyler Cashiering and the Enterprise ERP for credit card processing if we were to stick with it. Well, we want to stick with Tyler Cashiering and the payment portal and have chip readers, and that is still open edge, and Tyler Payments just rolled out their own processor.

There are other processors, as I mentioned. They were available then, they're available now but the problem is they do not work with Tyler Cashiering and they do not work with Resident Access Portal. If we were to use them, we would have to get rid of Tyler Cashiering completely. We would then have to take those credit card fees that are collected and manually enter all of that into every utility customer's bill thus slowing down the process significantly which is why we went for cashiering because it encompassed everything and did it as an all-in-one.

So then we go forward and I'm going to go, this is going to get a little mathy and probably put some people to sleep. But when we look at how merchant processing is done, merchant processing fees are charged by the processor in this case OpenEdge to process credit card payments made to the city by customers. This is not our payments going out, these are payments coming in.

To calculate what's known as an effective transaction fee rate or effective rate, you would take the total processing fees charged by the processor and divide that by the total number of sales processed or how much we collected on credit card fees. So I took those numbers and I actually missed some notes here. I took those numbers and I wanted to provide comparisons, and I started doing it year over year. And then I realized that when we negotiated in April of 25, that throws the year-over-year off because now I'm not presenting accurate numbers. So I started with 23 and 24 since those were prior to negotiation. You can see where we started.

With 74,000 transactions 19 million in sales almost 20 million and the fees were about 4.67 percent at the end of 24 that was this calendar year not fiscal year so this would be December not June we finished with 6,000 more transactions but our rates went up almost 22% as an effective rate because they the fees climbed from 929 thousand to 1.5 Which represented, again over the increased sales of 2.5 became about 22% increase.

So then I took it back and I said okay well let's compare apples to oranges here so let's do January to March quarter one of 24 and quarter one of 25. I compared just those three months to make sure that we were capturing prior to negotiations and after. In the prior to negotiations between those two quarters our transactions actually had gone down a small amount but the sales had gone up and the fees had climbed drastically Over, I believe if I'm reading correctly an 84.35% increase in the fees that we were being charged over those two quarters and that's just a three month snapshot.

Taking that after we renegotiated, I looked at the same quarter one in this year, January to March. The transactions actually went down even more to 259 transactions less than the prior year. Sales had increased $482,000 but you'll note fees went down drastically because of the renegotiation process. We went down $386,000 in that quarter in the fees that we were being charged which represent about an 80.2% reduction in fees over that same quarter Sorry, very mathy I know.

It's my world. So what did we reduce? What did this come down to? Well first I want to start with interchange fees or I'm sorry definitions so an interchange fee is the fee that the processor pays to the credit card issuing bank not Visa not MasterCard that's going to be network which is going to come up next but that's what the processor or OpenEdge pays to the banks that the credit cards are using.

Credit card fees that's the part that the credit card networks are charging to use your card. Those tend to be on the smaller side, usually about one and a half percent but then the discount rate is what the processor discloses that's their profit per transaction so they take that 1.5% that Visa charges and they tack on their additional discount rate which bumps it up to what previously was over 3% and that's profit for them So with those definitions in mind, prior to the negotiations, the discount rate was about 3%. It did vary card over card by type.

Rewards cards obviously get a much, much higher discount fee because somebody's got to pay for those rewards. Love them, don't get me wrong. But the other part of that is most of them averaged around 3%, some were 317, some were 326. I left it at three just for easiness. open edge per item fees. They were charging us anywhere between $1.18 and a $1 67 per transaction on top of those fees for their portion of processing, and then we renegotiated everything from that point.

We renegotiated them down to a flat 0.73% across all four major carriers or net major networks They took off their per transaction fee and instead of charging it that way they rolled it into the interchange fees, which as you noted is paid by the processor to the credit card issuing bank. That still we have to pay that part of it but that's how they rolled it into that to reduce that and that saved us about $500,000-$600,000 a year.

I don't have it on the slide but going back a bit During the time when we caught the issues, the credit card fees themselves came in at $606,000 over budget in 23-24 and 1.2 million over budget in 24-25 for a total of this is I believe Mr. Mosby had this number about $1.9 million over budget through those two fiscal years The current fiscal year, and I don't anticipate any adjusting entries as we were just talking about. So I think this is fairly set, is about 98,500 under budget which is big compared to where we were for the past two years so.

So with this information here, interchange fees can sometimes be reduced by negotiating on the per transaction added fee which is what we did here as you noted the open edge per item fees. Credit card fees are non-negotiable, nobody can negotiate on those that's Visa MasterCard, that's the four networks saying you're paying this, there's no negotiating and the discount rate is usually the only true negotiable portion of the processing fees which is the other part that we did work on with them to get it down from around 3% to 0.73 So in the final thoughts, the lack of notification from OpenEdge caused the original fees to balloon out of control. Because we weren't being notified of these raises, we weren't tracking them.

Since that point, we have implemented a new worksheet that tracks it regularly to record all of the OpenEdge credit card fees as well as calculating out the effective rates of those fees. And using that model, it will actually warn us when we are getting close to or over the budget. I've programmed it so that it yells at us.

1:12 – 1:1931 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:12:23

Come

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:12:23

on. And it stopped. So the new fee structure that we have that I mentioned prior was locked in for three years and will be renegotiated in 2028. Tonight, if you wanted to this is mostly just for presentation purposes but in the future or whenever Council could provide direction to staff to implement a convenience fee to utility customers paying via credit card as long as we have other options that exist which would include paying by check, paying by cash, paying by EFT or ACH etc and The fee would need to be limited to 3% or the average effective rate, whichever is lower. I've not been able to determine what the average is based upon if it's six months, is it a year? It doesn't seem to have the current, I don't know the Senate bill but it doesn't seem to have a clear distinction on how to calculate that average.

It just says the lower of their average effective rate. Most cities which I've mentioned here there's a few of them most of the cities that have implemented this charge about 2 1⁄2%. And as was brought up in the previous council meeting and I wanted to include it here, there are several California municipalities and special districts that have passed on the credit card fees as convenience fees including Fairfield, Vacaville, Lodi, Upland, Long Beach, and Garden Grove.

So with that, I am open to questions and comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:02

The money that was anticipated in the budget that was transferred and charged to the utilities for the credit cards, correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:12

Can you ask that again?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:13

You anticipated $600,000-$800,000 a year in the budget for credit card processing fees. That was divided amongst the utilities, correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:22

Yes, that comes back through the cost allocation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:25

So the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:26

money

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:26

above that...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:29

Is it borne by the general fund?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:30

That was general fund money. So that 1.8, 1.9 million is general fund revenue

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:35

that... Yep.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:39

So my other question is with this renegotiation you got locked in for three years and good job. I mean when I founded I was reviewing the ACFRD and finance was $1.1 million and then over and I'm like wait how are they over? What did you do? That was part of it. So how is this locked in for three years? You have slide number seven that says you've got it renegotiated for three years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:15:14

So when we worked with them and they sent us over the new fee structure and it was approved, then management services director, I'll spit this out, Kristi Donnelly signed the agreement for it locking us into those rates.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:15:30

So we have an agreement that's locked in and my question for the city attorney something of this much money is that something that should be approved by the council and signed by the city manager?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:15:48

Generally, yes. Anything over $100,000 or a couple years ago it was $220,000, any purchase like that or expenditure would go to City Council but I have not looked at this particular agreement to see if there's some exception.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:16:06

I'm assuming it is the type of contract? Is it not?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:16:09

It is considered an agreement or contract, I'm not sure what the difference in the terminology there. I do know that when I looked over the agreement it talked about the fees that we'd be charged but it doesn't have a amount of how much that would be because it's all dependent upon our sales received by credit card so that just providing that information I don't know where that goes from there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:16:28

So my curiosity is when we were getting charged this six plus percent credit card fee What kind of agreement was there that was allowing that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:16:42

The original fee structure that was signed by Brad Wilkie and Dean Albrow back in 2016.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:16:48

Was that number there in that agreement or you just said you're going to be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:16:52

charged a fee? That one had their full rate structure, those agreements there had the full rate structures for each type of card at each location and went through there. Those had that but again it's all based on sales so the total number wasn't there, just how much each fee was gonna be.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:17:07

But it had a 6% plus credit card?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:17:10

No, because it doesn't show it as one individual number. It broke it down as MasterCard. This MasterCard has this fee. This Visa Card has this fee. And they literally break it down by card, by card type, you know what I mean? It's super detailed. The version that I have printed out not with me but was four pages and the font is big. Oh, I gotcha.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:17:28

Just my curiosity is that we got into this. We've got a contract that's getting us straightened out and just my curiosity is You know, I'll let the other council members speak to but I think maybe we need to look at some. The legal department investigate how this agreement and if it wasn't written out as such, and it was one of those surprises. There's a lot of money that evaporated. I know there's some contractual cases, I think it's Long Beach versus one of the dredge companies. There are several cases that are out there that show that contracts were signed by people who weren't fully aware.

I'm quite confident anybody who signed something had no idea they were going to be... otherwise they would have been in the budget and anticipated this. But I think there's case law out there that would show that certain things are out there, but let me get some of the council members and then I'll try to formulate something. Council Member Ball?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:18:25

I actually agree on that. I think something I'm curious about that you mentioned is that this is not a staff hiccup. This is not you guys dropping the ball, not paying attention. It's kind of come out of nowhere. If we feel like we were at best misled or didn't have all the information, is there any questions about recourse or about going after them? Or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:18:50

do we just eat it? That would have to go through legal on that. I don't have any information on that. They haven't sent us any notifications because they can't raise them for three years but they now will be notifying us in 2028 when their fees start going up again. But the biggest issue was they weren't notifying us prior to that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:19:06

Yeah, I would just say you know obviously it's very injurious to us as a city for us to take a hit in the general fund. We use those for parks, police fire safety those things and for us not to know that that's obviously hurtful to us so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:19:18

I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:19:18

happy

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:19:19

to work with legal and whatever we can do to see if we can't go anything but when I negotiated with them we asked them to go retro and retroactive these fees back to the calendar year at least which would have been an additional four months and they said no Thank you.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:19 – 1:2430 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:19:52

The first thing that's not shown in the report, and I think is relatively important, is that the mayor through his due diligence is really what brought all this to light. And we owe him a big thank you for that. That's multi-thousands of dollars that should have been seen and it's really not his responsibility so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:15

He

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:20:15

cut the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:15

second year but we had already started the negotiations prior to the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:20:18

second year being published

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:19

and caught.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:20:21

So the Tyler contract, which is where this all kind of resided at the time. How long have we had a contract with them?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:31

We started the implementation and signed the contract in 2016.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:20:35

2016. And you just signed essentially another contract for another three years? Is that what I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:41

heard? No, no, this isn't with Tyler. That is just an agreement with OpenEdge for three years to lock in those rates.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:20:47

So we now only contract for our POS I'll call it, related to utilities for example with OpenEdge. So it's a separate contract

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:21:03

now? Yes and no. We're limited by the contract with Tyler who we can go with because we want to use Tyler Cashiering and the payment portal so we're limited. We can swap between them in Tyler Technologies which is why we're not technically under contract with either of those two. We're on contract with Tyler so we can swap either between those two at any time, but we have the signed agreement that they cannot change the rates for three years. It does not lock us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:25

in. So we still have a contract with Tyler? What's that? We still have a contract with Tyler?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:21:29

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:30

And that's another three years?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:21:32

I'm not sure how long the contract is on that one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:34

Okay this feels like the same kind of issue I've had with multiple contracts the city has that seem like forever contracts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:21:47

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:47

know it's not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:21:47

a forever, I just don't know when it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:49

terminates. I'm exaggerating mainly but if it was done in 2016 and we're in 2026 and I just heard well looks like we're heading for another three years That sounds like a forever contract to me. Well, that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:22:02

three years again is just them locking in the rates. They can't raise the rates. It doesn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:22:06

do anything for us. You just made the statement that it's either OpenEdge or Tyler. That implies to me we're locked into Tyler.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:22:13

But what I mean, no, that does not extend our contract with Tyler at all. That's just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:22:18

our agreement with OpenEdge, they can't raise

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:22:20

the fees.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:22:21

When is our contract with Tyler up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:22:22

That's what I don't know. I don't have the answer on when that's due because IT handles that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:22:27

contract. Perhaps you could come back with that date because again it feels like another forever contract. My last item is this is another classic if you were doing actuals to budgets You would have not gone $500,000 in whole before somebody was screaming wait a minute what's going on? And that's the reason we do actuals to budget, so that we don't come back and say what happened.

So I know I'm starting to sound like a broken record but I really think it's important when you look at finding a way to get some reasonable quarterly actual to budget so we can look at it and see whether we're running out of money. I understand exactly what you're saying. It was a great report though thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:23:19

Thank you. I've been 10 months trying to get to this level and to figure out and understanding what we have here, but I'm going to see if I can get two other people to support me with a simple request here that we have the legal investigate how this happened, whether there was a contract, whether it somehow slipped in 2016 How do we get to this point we got and likewise as well congrats on fixing this to the level you have but as well is to make sure that if there's an agreement, if it's contract, if it's locked in or if that needs to come back to the city manager and the council for the approval for If you renegotiate a contract, there must have been a contract out there already that was happening there. So if I can get two of the people to support me to ask the legal department to get involved with this to find out what happened as well as if there's a potential that we can get the monies back.

I think there's case law out there. If the agreement was implemented and it wasn't truly an agreement Authorized at that level contractually. I know there was a discussion about each individual and one was only a few hundred dollars, but it's accumulative amounts. So I think that there's...I don't want to call it gray area. I say it's definitely black or white because the gross amount is what's important not each individual one. So you might get two other people to support me with that to have the legal investigate that aspect.

1:24 – 1:316 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:24:58

I'll support you if you add in that we get some details on the Tyler contract itself as to how long it is and what we're committed to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:25:08

Anybody else? Give me a third. Council Member Boehl, give me a third on that. Do you need any more questions? You understand what I'm saying, right? And I think there's some case law out there that if it is a contract that was signed by somebody who wasn't authorized to sign the contract, we can get some money back.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:25:29

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:25:30

you, Council Member Ball. What do we got now? Oral communications, three minutes.

PresenterDinah Lockhart I'mAssociation of American University Women Lompoc-Vandenberg and I'm very excitedProposedself-stated1:26:07

Good evening Mayor Mosby, members of City Council, members of the public. My name is Dinah Lockhart I'm here on behalf of the Association of American University Women Lompoc-Vandenberg and I'm very excited to share with you that on Thursday October 8th We are going to have a non-partisan candidate forum here in City Council Chambers. Beginning at 530, we're gonna have a meet and greet in the city hall lobby where the candidates will have literature available, they'll have an opportunity to talk to residents.

And then we're gonna go into the actual forum itself at 630. We have all the candidates who have agreed to participate, so we're very excited about that and thank you all for agreeing. We have Ms. Segovia running for District 2, Council Member Vega, District 2. We also have Mr. Nick Gonzalez running for District 3 and Ms. Sarah Reed running for district three and then for the mayoral candidates we have Councilmember Jeremy Ball and also Mayor James Mosby. So again, we have different ways of participating with that forum you can join us a number of ways You can either be here live in City Council Chambers. You can join us via Zoom, and we have registration available.

There's a number of flyers that are going around the community. I passed some out here. I have some here as well. There's a QR code you can scan. It's also going to be live on TAP TV channel 23, it's going to be on CAPEG radio 100.9 FM, it will be translated in Spanish and also Mixteco and let's see what else I can say. And we're also available for registration on the internet just Google AAUW Lompoc Vandenberg And you will come up on our webpage and you can register.

You don't have to register to attend, but if you register, you can also input your questions for the candidates and we will ask those questions to all the candidates and they'll all have an opportunity to respond. Thank you.

PresenterGary Jeffrey I'mLompoc Valley Black Student UnionProposedself-stated1:28:49

Good evening Mayor, Councilmembers, staff and members of our community. My name is Gary Jeffrey I'm the President of the Lompoc Valley Black Student Union. Now over the past couple weeks I've been surveying students at Lompoc High School about flock cameras and I want to share what I found. Out of 200 students who were surveyed, approximately 70% said that they do not support flaw cameras. Approximately 61% said the cameras do not make them feel safer and approximately 86% said that they believe these cameras are a breach of people's privacy.

Regardless of where you stand on this issue, those numbers deserve to be heard. Young people are members of this community too and decisions involving surveillance, privacy and public safety affect all of us. I hope that this council takes the results into consideration as conversations surrounding Flock cameras continue. I also want to briefly address tonight's discussion regarding the censure of Councilmember Steve Bridge.

Accountability in government matters, a position on this dais comes with responsibility to the entire community and when questions about the conduct of an elected official arise they should be addressed openly fairly and transparently. I encourage this council and the public to carefully consider the evidence and the standards expected of those entrusted with public office And finally, as we approach the November election I am launching an exciting candidate interview series that is focused on giving our community and especially young people an opportunity to hear directly from those who are seeking to represent them.

So to every single candidate who is running for Lompoc City Council or Mayor you are invited I want this project to be open to candidates across the political spectrum. If you are interested in participating, please contact me after tonight's meeting or just reach me directly because civic engagement does not begin on election day. It happens right here when ordinary people decide that their voices matter. Week after week and month after month, we will continue to show up and apply pressure because that is what community is all about. Thank you.

1:31 – 1:386 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:31:13

I believe it's still scheduled for the next council meetings, the flock? Yep. So you hear that? Just letting you know the FLOC discussion is coming next meeting. All right. Got it? Next, oral communications.

PresenterKevin CrowellLompoc Firefighters Local 1906Proposedself-stated1:31:42

Evening Council, city staff and members of the community. I'm Kevin Crowell here with the Lompoc Firefighters Local 1906. There's been a lot of talk and discussion this year about the brownout of Rescue 51. I want to take this time to address publicly the little bit of a brief history behind that in public forum. About 14 years ago, the Lompoc Union conducted a retention study of its members after we noticed there was a high level of turnover in our department That study did confirm our findings. After conducting multiple exit interviews, we found that the number one reason for members to leave was pay and benefits. At that time we were behind our next comparable city in the low teens however over the last 14 years we've tried to gain ground on our comparable cities and departments but we've done the opposite.

We have dropped. We are currently 19 percent behind the next lowest paid department in the county, our next comparable. Over those 14 years we also have lost 30 firefighters in a department of only 24 personnel. We'll fast forward now and recap how retention is kind of coming back at us. In 2025 between the local and the fire department we figured out that we were going to have a staffing shortage soon for the Rescue 51 and that was going to be coming to us in 2026 We worked collaboratively with the management team and developed a multi-stage approach to mitigate the situation that then was implemented in 2026, with the approval of city staff including the City Manager. In 2026 we also came and discussed separately with the council members individually as well as city staff including HR Director and the City Manager The local came and discussed the upcoming retention problems and staffing situation that was going to come rear its head shortly.

And soon enough, three months later, Rescue 51 was browned out. We have been in discussions with the council as well as city staff for the last seven months going over and over time and time again Discussing the same problems, however we've gotten no traction and no concerted effort from either group to rectify the situation. Unfortunately my time's running out but this has led to another staffing shortage that is going to rear its head in the next few months. You will be most likely seeing an additional white engine in your community if you're not familiar we drive red engines Shortly we will not be able to staff the second engine in town. To recap that, in 2026 we have browned out Rescue 51 and shortly we will be browning out periodically an additional engine based off of our inability to retain personnel which is a direct reflection of the inability Moving forward, the city or the department will

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:34:49

continue our best efforts to provide service

PresenterKevin CrowellLompoc Firefighters Local 1906Proposedself-stated1:34:52

that this community deserves. However, due to being a penny wise and dollar foolish, the department is now forced

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:08

to round out any...

CommentAndy SchaeferProposedself-stated1:35:20

Hello, my name is Andy Schaefer and I have been a resident of Lompoc for over 15 years. First I want to thank the City Council members and Mayor Mosby for allowing me to speak on an important issue. I've read the allegations against Council Member Steve Bridges and I find them very serious indeed. And while I believe that everyone accused of a crime deserves his day, his or her day in court in front of a jury of their peers, I want to remind you that your job today is not to be that jury.

Your job today is to do what's best for your constituents and the City of Lompoc Therefore, I ask you to consider the following. Are the charges against Councilmember Bridge plausible and credible? Will defending himself against eight or more serious felony and misdemeanor counts including fraud against the very city he represents hinder Councilmember Bridge's ability to perform his duty for the City of Lompoc?

How will prolonging action affect the City Council's credibility and ability to focus on the daily concerns of the city of Lompoc? How this situation, if not addressed, will affect the confidence that Lompoc residents have in their local government. Ask yourselves, are you loyal to the city and its residents or to protecting the good old boys mentality? And finally will you be proud of your actions today.

Council members where there is smoke there is often fire and while smoke is not enough evidence to come to a clear conclusion it is enough to warrant action to prevent a fire One only has to look at the lack of confidence the American people have in our federal government to see that misplaced loyalties of people in power to officials with questionable motives has resulted in a government that is stymied and also low level of trust in the government by the American people.

Sometimes it's difficult to do what is right, but your actions today can be based on the value of truth and the rule of law or on misplaced loyalties. Please do what's best for Lompoc and avoid creating the same level of distrust in our local government as many have for us. I urge you to vote.

1:38 – 1:437 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:29

For general or communications if you want to speak about one of the future items, if you could wait till that item comes up. Appreciate it but we've got general oral communications. If you can't wait come on down. General oral communications.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:38:46

Karen Hauenstein, lifelong resident. Transparency and honesty in our leadership We have to trust our law enforcement, every single one of them. We have a really, really poor record coming out of the current leadership of the Lompoc police. So poor that when I stand up here on this dais and complain about it, I'm getting attacked by the very individuals I am criticizing To place me in jail, unlawfully.

We've got some really serious problems with transparency. It needs to change. It needs to start with the full report on the death of Liliana Cecilia Zuniga inside our Lompoc police station Reportedly on the 13th of March, 2023. That must happen or else our entire community does not know what happened or why.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:40:22

General communications. Anybody on Teams or phone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:40:29

Yes, Mayor Mosby. There is one public comment via Teams. Teams participant with the screen name of Renee, I will go ahead and unmute your mic and you have three minutes for your comments. Go ahead. Screen member Rene, are you there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:41:12

Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:41:13

Okay, you may go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:41:15

Good evening Mayor and Council Members. My name is Rene. I am a Lompoc resident and an organizer with 805 UndocuFund. I understand that FLOC may come up before this council in October. I'm asking the City to confirm that timeline and give our community enough notice to participate meaningfully Santa Barbara has already ended its clock contract in August, it's council held off on moving forward with a replacement system to allow further public input.

Lompoc should take that example seriously. Our residents deserve a meaningful opportunity to question whether automated license plates surveillance belongs in our community at all. Simply changing companies will not answer that question. Any proposed replacement deserves its own public scrutiny including costs, data collection, access control and potential for misuse.

Before October's decision please make that relevant information available the contract total cost data sharing policies available audits and evidence of the system's effectiveness include alternatives that do not depend on automated license plates surveillance Please release those materials early enough for residents to review them and prepare informed questions.

I'm also requesting Spanish interpretation and translated outreach. Decisions about surveillance affect families throughout Lompoc. Language should never prevent residents from understanding those decisions or speaking for themselves. Working families need time to arrange transportation, childcare, and their schedules. Community organizations need time to share accurate information.

Please confirm that anticipated meeting date, explain when supporting materials will be available and make language access part of the planning for the beginning. Public trust requires transparency and a real opportunity to influence the outcome. Our community is ready to participate. Give us the information notice and access to do so. Thank you.

1:43 – 1:489 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:34

Anybody else on Teams or the?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:43:38

There is no additional public comment via Teams or phone call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:42

I still haven't opened it here, but I haven't closed it yet so... One quick question. Page was it 467 of the big police manual has the flock. Is that accessed? I'd asked a couple meetings ago that could be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:43:59

More easily found? Our entire policy manual is available online. I know, I was just hoping that...I asked for that page a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:44:06

couple of meetings ago to be more easily accessible. There's a lot to read to get to that one but do you know if that's been made? I don't know. Okay. Remember me asking that a couple of meetings ago? City attorney, city manager interim acting? You did and i will find out. I'll follow up and see. Just so it could be a little easier to find its Nobody's trying to hide anything, it's there.

I went back and reviewed because you have the FLOC videos on there that shows from the drone as the flight patterns and all that identified there and such.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:44:40

We do have two links one for the cameras that exist on the roadways and the other one for the FLOC aerodrome. Thank you. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:44:54

Good evening. One thing we talk about a lot is contract compliancy and transparency, and yet one contract in particular continues to plague the city. The council has oversight of the contract with Visit Lompoc. In April 4th, 2023 Atul Patel board member of Visit Lompoc called into this council and made the following statement. I'm listening to everything that's being said this evening and last week when we had our special meeting Mr. Bender was told that we'd be getting an independent financial audit done for the last three years for Explore Lompoc. Please give us as a board the benefit of the doubt and stop accusing or making allegations that are unnecessary until a financial audit is done.

And if the city would like to have the city do a financial audit of our books, we are more than happy to. And we have made that very clear. Later, a year later May 21st 2024 Councilmember Ball stated VLI is going to be doing an independent audit. The value to the city is that they're going to do and find stuff that you couldn't or do they feel confident that you're asking a question to the staff? Or are they going to find stuff that you couldn't find?

City staff replied, if they do an independent audit they will go in and not just review the statements or income statements or balance sheet. They will look to see if those numbers tie out to the receipts and that the checks that they say they wrote, they actually wrote. Well earlier this year this council asked Visit Lompoc under their contract 10.1 to provide five years worth of receipts.

The issue is no one's looked at those receipts since they've been provided. I did. Those receipts are hundreds of thousands of dollars short in what Visit Lompoc is reporting, so if their annual report says they spent $350,000 there should be receipts for that year to show $350,000 was spent and how it was spent. It doesn't add up. There's no accrual versus cash basis, you know, excuse. There's no delayed payment excuses. We've heard all the different reasons of why the numbers that they report don't necessarily add up but the actual receipts that this council asked for don't add up so I would ask at this point it's been three and a half years since they themselves said they were going to financial independent financial audit. They never did it And I'm asking that this council take a vote, or at least calendar for discussion whether or not it's time to order an audit for Visit Lompoc.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:47:30

Anybody else? General oral communications.

CommentLuis PadillaProposedself-stated1:47:43

Hello everybody and City Council. I am Luis Padilla, I'm 17 years old and I'm the co-captain of the Lompoc High School debate team. And I'm here to speak to you about flock cameras from what my other captain from the debate team have said earlier There's a consensus among the students that we are generally not a fan of this mass surveillance, and that's what it is.

From the 56 cameras in Lompoc for the amount of people that come down these streets and the amount of immigrant population that we have within this town, I feel safe to say Most people can get behind no longer having this contract with the company of Flock. And I want to close off with a quote from Benjamin Franklin, those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Thank you.

1:49 – 1:535 turns

CommentAlexis OteroProposedself-stated1:49:06

Good evening, everyone. My name is Alexis Otero and I'll go ahead now keep it really brief. A big reason that I wanted to come up and make a statement is because I'm really worried about public safety With the staffing issues that we've had with the fire department, you know as we're headed into this huge weather event, this super El Nino where anything can happen. We've been very lucky that this year we haven't been plagued with the wildfires and stuff that we have in the past Now that being said, that's not a good excuse for firefighters. People who literally put their lives on the line to run into burning buildings.

They assist EMS. You know they're huge public servants and they only get a fraction of the budget that the police get so I just can't Square that circle where we're looking at, you know browning out a whole station and the police have flock drones and A lifted truck that they just get to you know race down Ocean Street whenever they feel like it It's it's a waste of money. It's money that we could be spending better And I just you know, it's They shouldn't have to beg and prostrate to get the services that they need the things that they need The simple issue for the staffing is simple, pay them the work that they owe and make the benefits package good enough that people can afford to stay and serve the communities that they love so much. Thank you!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:51:04

Good evening members of the Council. I'll ask your forgiveness, I have to get up early in the morning and go to work so I'm going to get it all out of the way here within three minutes and then I'll be out of your hair. First, I would like to comment on the item that's coming up about the letter being sent in regards to fishing off of Surf Beach. I have a couple of assumptions and maybe you can actually correct me if I'm wrong. The assumption is that the letter is being submitted on behalf of the citizens of Lompoc, is that correct?

The second assumption I would have is that you have the statistical data that says that the majority of the citizens of Lompoc support that letter to be submitted, or is this simply a letter being submitted by the Free Surf Beach Committee based on those individuals within that group?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:52:02

I'll answer shortly afterwards, but go ahead. Finish up with your rest of public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:52:06

So the second part of it is as regards to Councilmember Bridge, I believe that you are innocent until proven guilty? But I also believe there's ethical considerations that have to be taken into consideration. And when one service is stained by allegations, then the ethical and the upright thing to do would be to recuse yourself Without having to be told, without having to be censured. To step back and especially if you firmly believe that there is no guilt at all then take that step to prove and stay out of the conversations probably that if indeed these items are proved to be true They could taint some of the contracts and different things that are being voted on here within the city council. So once again, this free surf beach signs and petition and letter, and then Council Member Bridge I don't judge you until the court of law says guilty or not guilty.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:27

Anybody else? General oral communications. Seeing nobody else rise, we'll close oral communications and bring back to Council request. Discussion of additional roadway crossing in the Santa Ynez River potentially located at item number 11. Mr. Deerling?

1:54 – 2:031 turns

CommentExplore LompocProposed · by introduction1:54:11

Thank you, good evening. So this council request was made at the March 3rd City Council meeting for staff to contact the county, review data and see if we can fund and rebuild the low water crossing that used to exist at McLaughlin Road. Let's see if this laser works. You can see that up on this side of the screen. Oops sorry, I advance it. So basically north end of A Street Turns at River Bend Park and where McLaughlin Road currently dead ends at a gate and other things.

That's where the crossing began, driving across the river to the other side of McLaughlin Road at Rucker Road. Two things, the staff report doesn't speak of pilot channels and I don't have any pictures or written data but I believe it included a pilot channel or a narrowed deeper flow path with culverts to pass low flows as well as the earthen fill that's discussed in the staff report so graded riverbed up to make I'm here to talk about the proposed roadway running across some culverts to pass low flowing river water and probably topless gravel or something since asphalt apparently wasn't even allowed back in the 90s.

And as the staff report explains, now regulatory agencies don't allow So as also, as I understand historically and based on our correspondence with the county it appears that this low water crossing likely washed out every one to three years or so. Thanks. So staff following the council's request We talked to the county and reviewed a bunch of data, and looked for funding from FEMA and other sources.

And the staff report summarizes those tasks. In talking with the county they said basically that Reconstructing the Little Water Crossing is infeasible because regulatory agencies don't allow that anymore, resource agencies. We've done other riverbed projects in the last 10 to 15 years and it was years of permitting to get to a point that we could work in the river bed so we understand their feedback on that.

So the county said that basically a roadway across the river would need to be a bridge, not a low water driving on the riverbed type crossing. And in the funding research, as outlined in the staff report, staff did not find a funding source to rebuild if this was allowed by regulatory agencies to rebuild such a low water crossing. We did review FEMA and other funding sources. A number of those sources would fund a bridge if it was a competitive enough project but not a low water crossing.

And then if we could advance to slide two, thanks. There you go one back yeah. So this is information review. This is a flood insurance rate map from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and all the maybe I'll use this better laser pointer. Yeah that's real bright. So that the outer blue here, which is shown again on a later slide is the limit of the special flood hazard area.

The 1% annual chance flood sometimes called 100-year flood plain. There's an inner area that's hard to see this far away that has kind of a crosshatching called the floodway so there's a floodplain and a floodway. The floodway is generally the faster moving water We aren't allowed to place any fill within because it would raise the water surface elevation. So anyway, we reviewed those maps.

This firm map showing horizontal limits and several others adjacent panels. This one shows where the McLaughlin Crossing was so as you can see on this map north end of A Street turns into McLaughlin Road and pretty much immediately at the turn we're in the floodway already so there's about half a mile of floodway from this point to the other side of the river near the Rucker Road intersection Similarly, FEMA also has profiles in their flooded insurance studies that tell you how deep they map the water to be.

And for the 10-year recurrence interval storm or the 10% annual chance storm, the depth in that location is around 13 feet as the staff report mentions. So substantial depth. So moving on, maybe we can show the next slide. Some other considerations, staff also reviewed the safety element which was the reason this council request was made. This is a figure from the safety element that shows evacuation analysis. It shows a little bit of the fire hazard severity zones, maybe not as clearly as one of their other maps but the focus of this map is These colored roadway segments indicating that the congestion basically, it's called a volume to capacity ratio. So the number of vehicles or the volume of vehicles being higher than the capacity of the roadway to freely flow.

So in an evacuation event such as a fire from the north or a mishap at Vandenberg Space Force Base when the city would need to evacuate to the south or to the east This map shows congestion to the south and east on State Routes 1 and 246 because those roadways don't have the capacity for a fast evacuation. So that's a consideration of the city. Another thing the staff report mentions is like the purpose of these evacuation routes would be to be resilient and to efficiently evacuate the city. So we'd want to space them out so that a closure of one evacuation route doesn't affect its backup route, so you don't close all your routes at the same time.

So if there was an incident to the north, we wouldn't want to make our other backup evaluation route go so far north that the same incident would close that route. And similarly to the south. So we'd want our evacuation routes to be available year round, to be adequately spaced and to provide a sufficient capacity so that the city could readily evacuate And then maybe we can move on to the last slide.

So this slide shows more zoomed in and clearly just with the outlines of those FEMA floodway and floodplain lines, and up here near the top is where the McLaughlin Crossing was so the inner blue lines are floodway and the outer purple lines are floodplain Maybe we zoom out a tiny bit. Right here is the intersection of Rucker Road and McLaughlin Road, and here's where A Street turns into McLaughlin Road.

So one maybe brighter spot in this story is that SBCAG, the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments received a $400,000 grant last year to study Lompoc Valley regional transportation issues. One of which being a river crossing in the northeast area of the city. So to get from the northeast area of the city to outside the city across the river. That study should begin later this year and should come up with some solutions over a period of a couple years.

And SPCAG will coordinate with a number of stakeholders including city staff, and the study will involve public engagement and be in an open process so The results of that study can inform future grant applications and progress toward a resilient connection for the city in the northeast portion. Thank you, I'm open for questions.

2:03 – 2:0810 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:03:33

Yeah, so I'm just curious. So obviously they're going to look into something. Obviously you're saying FEMA doesn't want us to do anything other than maybe a bridge best case scenario from what you see and what you know is it make more sense to look at that McLaughlin as an option or what about the old ideas when they used to talk about Central going all the way through? Has that been bantered about at all? Just curious.

CommentExplore LompocProposed · by introduction2:03:58

Well, I think the study that SPCAG does would look at kind of a broad spectrum of where makes sense and Central Avenue definitely would have a lot higher vehicle capacity and be kind of a straighter shot with shorter area floodway and floodplain to cross. So yeah, that is a consideration.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:04:18

Thank you. I was just curious if they're looking at multiple options and are there any other options that we don't know about or those pretty much the two realistic

CommentExplore LompocProposed · by introduction2:04:27

Those seem to be the most obvious. Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:04:31

do you have something? So it seems a shame for over 100 years that was a crossing and then because it got whoopsed after the big El Nino event in the late 90s but I mean growing up watching it come go but back in the old days they'd get a couple of big tractors and they push the culverts in and get it done In a weekend or so it'd be back to use. I think I found an old traffic study, it was on your door for quite a few years but it was 4300 vehicle trips used to use that something like that in that ballpark. So it was the Gloughlin was a main artery for us.

It just seems kind of funny how they can replace crossings at Red Rock and Rivulio There's, I think a couple in Montecito still that are low-rodder crossing. So maybe we just missed the mark but I don't know if historically there is still a way. Did you write FEMA at all about this or?

CommentExplore LompocProposed · by introduction2:05:40

I did not write FEMA no just researched what I could find. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:05:45

there's still allegedly that missing letter from about 2019 or 20 I guess Allegedly a response from the county supervisors. I'll ask next time you see Supervisor Nelson, I'll ask him and see if he can. He's the one actually told me about it some seven or eight years ago so we can find that letter but And that was one to paraphrase that the county said they wouldn't take charge. FEMA would fund one once every 10 years, but maybe they were just referencing some of these historical documents you found as well.

Appreciate ya digging into it. You gave a few more historical documents that I haven't seen for awhile. We know it was a tried-for event in the past In answering the Central Avenue extension in 1978, they'd actually kind of kicked that out. That was the MX Missile project they were looking at putting that one in, the Central Avenue extension. So that was kinda thing we kinda had a little bit in our impact fee studies, $124 million project I think it was but understanding that it's probably something that's not gonna get funded because you mentioned about use right?

How did you relay that about McLaughlin Is there a necessity of use?

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentExplore LompocProposed · by introduction2:07:13

Yes, showing a high benefit cost ratio, improving resiliency. Talking about those measures that I discussed earlier and clearly protecting life safety or beneficial infrastructure and when we talked about the considerations for resilient egress having a high I'll see if I can find

not transcribed≈24s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:05

It was a viable, an important part of our community and the busiest intersection we have which is Central and H. So having that open would've relieved a lot of the tensions or pressures but thank you very much for that. Let me go to public comment on this item. Public comment on item number 11.

CommentJanet BlevinsProposedself-stated2:08:27

My name is Janet Blevins. I've lived in Lompoc for about 40 years, and I used to live in the neighborhood right next to this crossing. And every time it rained when it used to rain back in the day, it closed. It wasn't passable. The idea that we are thinking about redoing McLaughlin Road when we can't even pay our fire department is ridiculous!

2:08 – 2:1414 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:59

Anybody else? Anybody on Teams or cell phone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:09:18

There's no additional public comment via Teams or phone call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:09:23

Good, we'll close public comment and bring it back to Council. Appreciate what you came up with. I was hoping you had a better report for a grant to fund this, not general fund but a grant as it was paid for in the past. Thank you. Yeah. All right, item number 12.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:09:54

Fishing at Surf Beach. Good evening Mayor and members of the Council. This is a council request that was made on September 1st and the request was that City Council requested that staff prepare a supplemental letter to the Commission reiterating the city's request that Surf Beach be reopened for fishing. The issue is expected to be heard for a final discussion at the Fish and Game Commission meeting in Sacramento in mid-October. So the recommendation is that the council review and approve the attached, the letter, the draft letter to the Fish and Game Commission in support of modifications to the Vandenberg Marine Reserve to allow fishing at Surf Beach.

Thank you. Any

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:41

questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:10:47

So approximately seven years ago, we initiated

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:49

this as a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:10:49

council. The petition

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:17

First we did is to get the beach open for the plovers so that we weren't closed down through the Coastal Commission. We won that battle, they gave us a half mile so we're not violated if somebody came up and violated the plovers, they didn't hold the rest of us against the rest of us in closing the whole beach. So in the same timeframe we found out at that meeting that we had an opportunity to petition to make it a conservation area to potentially open up some fishing there So we initiated a letter way back when and a petition with the state, and they do once every 10 years analytics.

And we're up on the ten years so well as your seven on that petition. So that's why this is formulated of moving forward over such a long period. So I the city manager couldn't make the event May 5th early this year he asked me to go down and speak. Which I did, and they are deliberating on the final discussions in 15th or 16th of October. So that's where it came from and that's where we are asking for a letter to say hey yeah the council still supports us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:12:27

Are you hopeful they might take this letter under consideration realistically? In what way? Are you hopeful that they might listen to Lompoc or is there any precedent for them adjusting fishing along the coast?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:41

Yeah, it does happen. I did meet with one of the commissioners a couple weeks ago came and checked out the beach and said hey We qualified under the EJ component. They did the analytics out of all the MPAs, we were the only one that made 100%. They qualified us with that. I just recently got a modeling called a sea sketch model that shows the preserve is as big as it is, this small little section will have a very small effect.

Over 30 square miles out there and we're looking at such a small amount for species not endangered or threatened. It looks promising. We don't know until we throw a line in the water. This is what we're doing here, throwing a line in the water. Great, thank you. That

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:13:37

sounds good. Does

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:37

that answer it? All right. Any other questions before we go to public comment on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:13:57

Regarding Surf Beach, I have a couple of questions. Who benefits really from that financially? I know you were down at the beach one day talking to tourists and one of the things you were talking about was a pier and these trails and things like that. You know, already we have issues with trash and stuff that washes up. Trash that people leave, okay? What is turning it into a fully open tourist trap going to do for the beach and for the environment in that area?

And who is financially benefiting from your plans? Answers?

2:14 – 2:195 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:14:56

Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you for the opportunity to speak. I've been a resident in Lompoc for over 33 years and I used to spend a tremendous amount of time early on at Surf Beach, have always enjoyed it, loved it. I was here before the Plover closures. I appreciate the Plover closures, excuse me. Because I also am very environmentally conscious for both our landscapes as well as our wildlife. I remember the fishing, the surf fishing on Surf Beach.

I remember the buildup of trash particularly plastic and fishing line, which is extremely dangerous and harmful to our marine animals. And I would hate to see it come back because we've done such a good job in protecting an invaluable marine environment So I urge you to think maybe a little more deeply about the effects overall on the environment. I do believe that Halama Beach still does allow surf fishing, and that's pretty close by. I think I am correct on that. I haven't looked for a long time.

But again, Surf Beach is unique in its wildness and its natural environment. And I do believe that the Lompoc citizens enjoy it as it is today. And when the beach opens up from the plover restrictions, many, many more people go out and have an opportunity to do so. It's a good balance between humans and our marine mammals. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:17:02

Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:05

Teams? Cell phones?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:17:08

There is no public comment via teams or cell phones.

CommentAlexis OteroProposedself-stated2:17:17

Hi, Alexis Otero longtime Lompoc resident. I understand people's frustration about not being able to go on the beach during plover season because it's some of the best beach days of the year you know especially September beautiful time to go to the beach However, a man very near and dear to my heart by the name of Vernon Heumann. He was a naturalist and a birdwatcher and he actually wrote a book on the flora and fauna of Lompoc in the Central Coast if you ever want to read something from a local artist it's called A Naturalist at Play by Vernon Heumann And he was kind of like my grandpa growing up. And so growing up with somebody who had such a deep respect and reverence in nature, he you know in the few because it was kind of like a broad switch well not a broad but like a way anyway doesn't matter When we would talk, he would really instill in me how important nature and the cycle of life is.

And how severely we humans can impact nature to its detriment even unintentionally. So I would urge any kind of step forward on this to really consider that You know whether we like it or not These these little birds these little birds depend on us. They depend on us to keep them alive a few years ago just Down I think it was in Arroyo Grande It made national news that Jake Paul He was illegally riding through the dunes and he ran over and crushed a bunch of snowy plover eggs.

And so it was this huge national story, and I really worry that if we open up the sections of beach where they lay That we are going to have our own little local Jake and Logan Pauls running around in the restricted areas during plover season. And so for the sake of these little birds who can't come up here and speak for themselves, I would just urge to keep in mind that we have a lot of power and responsibility when it comes to the husbandry of the areas around us.

And please consider that when you make any further decisions, thank you.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:20 – 2:2516 turns

CommentErika Diaz-CervantesProposedself-stated2:20:01

Good evening City Council members. My name is Erika Diaz-Cervantes, I am the Associate Policy Director with CAWS living here in Lompoc as a Lompoc resident. So I think to everything that other folks have shared around environmental justice impact, I think I also want to speak around the impact that our community faces this evening. So i'm also here to ask the council to practice honesty and integrity today as mentioned before by voting to censure council member Steve Bridge Many people have lost trust in the government. Let's not continue to further strain the perception people have in our local government.

If you allow Council Member Steve Bridge to stay on the council, then you are setting the precedent that council members cannot be held accountable and are allowed to hold power while serious charges are up against them. It is time to restore the faith of community and those who they have elected to represent us. Your decision today will be known to the rest of Lompoc. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:21:01

We're still doing public comment on item number 12. Item number 12, public comment. Not 13 but 12.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:21:13

Good evening City Council members. My name is Alexandra and I am a student at Lompoc High School. I'm here tonight to call for the kind of leadership and representation the residents of Lompoc deserve. As councilmembers, you were elected to be voice of the community and represent integrity honesty and accountability The charges Steve Bridges is currently facing go against the values a council should hold. Many community members have been calling for his resignation for some time now, and it is time you take the action and make the change many of your campaigns ran on.

Public trust is the foundation of effective leadership. It is important that the concerns of the community are addressed and taken seriously. I call for you all to vote to censure Steve Bridge and serve as leaders that put the residents first and maintain their trust. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:22:05

Mayor, item number 13 regarding the censure is the very

next item on the agenda so we do need to keep the public comment on this item regarding Surf Beach.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:22:19

I've been trying to reiterate that. So again if it's item 12 not 13?

CommentSurf BeachProposed · by introduction2:22:25

Oh,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:22:26

I wanted to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:22:33

Item 12 or 13,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:22:34

what are you up to? My name is Diego and I'm a student at Lompoc High School. I'm here today to ask the City Council to practice integrity and accountability by voting to censure Steve Bridge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:22:46

Mayor, we're on item number 12 which is regarding Surf Beach.

The next item is the censure item so we cannot take any more public comment on censure right now. We're on Surf Beach We will be there in two minutes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:23:11

Tonight we ask you to vote for the censure of Steve Bridge. Mayor,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:23:14

we cannot take more public comment regarding censure

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed2:23:28

Good evening Council, Mayor, Aaron Crocker, resident dad. I go to Surf Beach a lot. I don't know if I have an opinion on the fishing thing yet. I don't think I have enough information but I am concerned with submitting some kind of letter on behalf of the council, of Lompoc in general In support of it, when this is the first I'm hearing of it and granted that I don't tune into everything but I do wonder if the council is voting on it. Have each of you spoken to your constituents in your respective district about sending this letter at all?

Any kind of confirmation that then you guys can turn around and feel confident in voting yes to then send this letter that is representative of Lompoc, of the citizens, of the council? That's my main question. I don't know that I'm comfortable just sending something off when we don't have all the information out in front of us. Not that I am against the phishing thing but thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:24:40

Anybody else, public comment? I see no one else will pose public comment on item number 12. To answer a quick few questions the boardwalk was a suggestion by the Coastal Commission to connect Ocean Park and Surf Beach. And that's still something on their agenda, the boardwalk that would be running parallel to the train tracks part of was for ADA compliance and such.

That's not we're looking at as far as the snowy plovers. They still have their territory this is a half mile section of the beach that is open Not to be affecting the snowy plumbers. It'll still be in violation with that. Littering will still be against the law. This is about a petition that we did seven years ago, that just finally got reviewed. So this is what this letter's about.

It's been available posted correct? So it has been available and such out there in the wilds. Does anybody have any other questions? I'll make the motion that we move forward with the signing and providing this letter to the Fish and Game Commission.

2:26 – 2:336 turns

CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction2:26:05

I'll go ahead, I'll go ahead in a second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:08

It's been first and second, let's go ahead and vote. And that passes 4-1 with Council Member Ball voting no. Item number 13.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:26:47

Good evening, Mayor and Council. On August 18th at the council's request you considered a few options that are legally available for discipline or disapproving action against a sitting City Council member in the event that the majority of the council felt that taking such an action was warranted And out of that discussion, you directed staff to place this item on tonight's agenda to consider whether or not to adopt a censure resolution against Councilmember Bridge. Councilmember Ball volunteered at the August 18th meeting to draft a proposed censure resolution for the council to consider That resolution is attached to the staff report that you have here tonight as Resolution Number 6850. A public censure by a city council is a formal statement by the council reprimanding one of its members for certain conduct.

It can take the form of adopting a written resolution, like you have tonight. It could be just a verbal reprimand and it can contain requests that the council member take or refrain from taking certain actions such as like a request to resign The Council Member who is being censured must be given notice that the censure will be considered on a certain date.

Here, Council Member Bridge was given notice that tonight the censure resolution would be considered and he must be given an opportunity to respond and to refute the allegations before the council votes on the censure. So as it says in the staff report, the council should after you have any questions that you might have for me take public comment. When public comment is over then provide Council Member Bridge an opportunity to refute the allegations that are in the proposed resolution and then the council can consider whether or not to adopt the censure resolution There is no staff recommendation on this item. It is purely a decision by the City Council whether to censure one of your own members.

That concludes the staff report, I can take questions and then public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:29:15

Questions for the City Attorney? Seeing none we'll open up to public comment

CommentJanet BlevinsProposedself-stated2:29:35

Finally, after all of those long, long, long reports we get to the real meat of the evening. And look at everybody who's still here. Excellent. John Savernock, the District Attorney of Santa Barbara County doesn't file bad cases. He doesn't lose cases in court He takes his job very, very seriously. Hence the charges totaling 25 against Mr. Bridge. Some of them are misdemeanors.

Some of them are felonies. I don't know the breakdown but it's 25 charges from the District Attorney of Santa Barbara County Yes, he is innocent until proven guilty. His trial has been scheduled to start many times however his attorney is involved in a murder case in another court in another city apparently that is taking much much longer than anybody thought it would So hence, delay after delay after delay.

It doesn't change the fact that our District Attorney, he hasn't reduced any of the charges in all that time, he doesn't play around so these are serious charges and finally There were three people on this council led by Mr. Ball who agreed to consider this item. Well, hooray! Good Lord. However, I mean really we withstood lots of long, long reports that didn't really tell us very much, didn't we?

But we're still here. And that's because we do care about our city and we care about how it's, how we look to the rest of the county. This is not a game and our John Savarnak District Attorney of Santa Barbara County has a pretty good win record So it is damn time. Anybody

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:00

else?

2:33 – 2:394 turns

PresenterGary Jeffrey I'mLompoc Valley Black Student UnionProposedself-stated2:33:08

I wasn't going to say anything during this period, but after months and months and months of us asking for you guys to say something, do something. We finally have an opportunity to do so. So I please hope that you take the opinion of the community into consideration. Thank you.

CommentSurf BeachProposed · by introduction2:33:38

I'll take a page out of Gary's book and keep it very brief. I think folks, you guys know my opinion about this. I think it's about time for something like this to happen. You know again, innocent until proven guilty but meanwhile the entire county Things were a laughing stock when businesses look up what if they want to come to Lompoc. This is what they're seeing and I think it would do a lot of good to show that there is a lot of concern and some pushback coming from our council, thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed2:34:28

Good evening, Mayor Mosby, Councilmembers Starbuck and Vega. I want to try something different tonight. Instead of telling you what you should think, I want to ask you some questions. Mayor Mosby, what standard do you believe should apply when a sitting councilmember is facing serious criminal charges involving alleged conduct connected to public funds and public office?

And Councilmember Starbuck, when you oppose bringing this matter forward previously what information would you need to see before you believe censure was warranted? Councilmember Vega. What would you tell a resident who committed comparable conduct and then said case hasn't been resolved yet so you shouldn't hold me accountable for it? Would you accept that answer?

And if you wouldn't accept it from a resident, what makes the standard different for someone sitting on this dais? I'm also asking each of you to consider a simpler question. What exactly is censure? It's not a criminal conviction, it's not a removal from office, it's not the council deciding the outcome of a criminal case. It's a governing body making a statement about whether the conduct of one of its members is consistent with the standards expected for public office. So ask yourselves, if you believe the conduct before you tonight falls below those standards what would prevent you from saying so?

This meeting is And there is another question I think matters. If Council's position is that voters should simply deal with this through a recall, then why does Council have a censure process at all? What gives yourselves and why give yourselves an accountability tool if you're unwilling to use it when circumstances call for uncomfortable decisions? We're not asking you to prejudge a criminal case. We're not asking you to decide what standard you believe applies to the conduct of someone serving on this council, or I am asking you and then apply that standard consistently. So before you vote tonight, I would ask each of you what do you want this council to do if the person involved weren't your colleague and friend?

What standard would you want applied if this were happening to someone you didn't know And most importantly, what do you believe the people of Lompoc have a right to expect from the people they elected to represent them? You don't have to answer me but you do have to answer those questions for yourselves and

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:37:38

Hello, my name is Tracy. I have lived in Lompoc since 2016 and I live in District 1. Councilmember Bridge is my representative. I have submitted comment before about this situation and I am here tonight to support the censure of Councilmember Bridge. I understand that he is presumed innocent, and I'm not asking this council to decide whether he's guilty—that's for the courts.

But I also don't believe that we have to wait for a criminal conviction before we can talk about public trust and accountability. There are now 15 charges in the amended complaint, including allegations involving forgery, theft, misappropriation of public funds, identity theft and fraudulent city rebate claim. After the preliminary hearing, a judge found that there was enough evidence for the case to move forward. None of that means he's guilty but these are serious allegations involving public money and I believe they deserve a serious response from the people who govern our city.

I've heard the argument that other people have submitted questionable rebate applications but I don't think that's the point. Those people weren't elected to represent me, my vote in my district that I live in. When you're elected to public office, I believe that you're held to a higher standard, not the lowest standard that we can find somewhere else. And that's why I support censure. Censure doesn't remove Councilmember Bridge from office or overturn the election. Simply allows the council to formally say that the circumstances before it are serious enough to warrant public condemnation. As a District 1 resident, I'm asking you to uphold that higher standard and support the censure. Public office is public trust.

Don't violate it. Thank you.

2:39 – 2:443 turns

CommentRuth GaryProposedself-stated2:39:26

Hi, my name is Ruth Gary. I really have a short comment. I wasn't even going to say anything. I just feel that it's unfortunate this had to be at the end of the night. Students who wanted to speak weren't even allowed to speak. It wasn't time they have school tomorrow. My main thing is I do support the censure. If any of us, I'm a parent. If I got a call and oh my child has been accused of doing this that and the other even if it hasn't went to court there would still be some type of discussion consequences something that we would have to talk about at home in the family that has nothing to do with the courts That's kind of how I feel about this situation.

Criminal activities, don't put yourself in positions that's questionable. And the last thing that I wanted to just say is that I hope that we do something now it would be fairly embarrassing if we wait and then he is found guilty and then everyone who's been in this room calling for it comes here and ask all of you guys well now there's been a year of us asking and you know the courts have done it now what are you gonna do? So that's all I have thanks

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentErin MosbyProposedself-stated2:41:03

Good evening Councilmembers, I'm Erin Mosby. My name is Alex Merkison and I am a lifelong resident of Lompoc. I am here tonight in support of the censure of Councilmember Bridge. And frankly, I think this council has waited long enough to say something. When this first came before our community, Councilmember Bridge was facing eight felony charges. Since then, this case has not gone away and it's become significantly more serious.

There was a multi-day preliminary hearing. Witnesses testified. Evidence was presented and a judge determined there was sufficient evidence for the case to proceed toward trial and additional charges were added along the way. Now I want to be clear, Councilmember Bridge has pleaded not guilty. He is entitled to due process and ultimately his guilt or innocence belongs in the courtroom but due process for Councilmember Bridge does not require silence from this council. Those are two completely different things because these allegations involve city funds they involve city programs they involve the very public resources that people sitting on the dais are entrusted to oversee And that's why, for me, this isn't just about Councilmember Bridge.

It's about the entire council. It's about whether this institution is willing to say that serving on the Lompoc City Council comes with a standard. We ask people to trust local government every single day, trust where their money goes, trust our programs, trust the process and trust the people making decisions on their behalf. But trust isn't something government gets to demand from the public. You have to earn it and sometimes we have to defend it.

Since your doesn't remove Council Bridge from office, it doesn't take away his vote and it doesn't determine whether he is guilty. Your own staff report makes that clear. It simply allows this council to say that what is happening matters. That public trust matters and there's a standard that comes with the privilege of serving this community. At some point saying nothing becomes a statement too.

Tonight this council gets to decide what statement it wants to make. Thank you

CommentAndrea PelagioProposedself-stated2:43:09

Good evening, Council. My name is Andrea Pelagio and I'm the Lompoc Community Organizer with Future Leaders of America. The work that is done through Future Leaders of America is centered around youth voices and their communities. We encourage them to get involved in their communities and teach them their voices matter. We teach them that civic participation is important but also that they have a role in shaping the future of their communities However, civic engagement requires trust.

Trust in their community, trust in elected officials and trust in public institutions. Trust is built through transparency. In order to reinforce the trust that has been lost and the belief that participating in democracy matters those elected to serve and the government body must be transparent and honest. With the loss of trust comes a great uncertainty. It leaves community members, youth included to wonder if their voices and participation are truly considered.

This only emphasizes why the need for accountability matters. As a resident of Lompoc that is also civically engaged and involved in my community I hope our elected officials set a strong example of what responsible public service looks like Young people are watching, learning and deciding what kind of relationship they want to have with their government. We want to believe that our voices matter and that our leaders will be held to high standards of honesty, transparency and accountability. Thank you for your time.

2:44 – 2:525 turns

CommentKingston ArmeroProposedself-stated2:44:45

Hello, City Council. My name is Kingston Armero and I am a youth leader with Future Leaders of America. Through our work we encourage youth to participate in their communities and in our democracy. We teach young people that their voices matter, that civic participation is important, and they have a role in shaping the future of their communities. But civic engagement depends on trust. When young people see elected officials and public institutions acting with transparency, honesty, and accountability it reinforces the belief that participating in our democracy matters.

When that trust is broken, it can make young people and community members question whether their voices and participation truly make a difference. This is why accountability in public service matters. Regardless of political affiliation or personal beliefs, elected officials have a responsibility to uphold the public's trust and to demonstrate integrity in their service to the community.

As a young person engaged in civic life I hope our local government continues to set a strong example of what responsible public service looks like. Young people are watching, learning and deciding what kind of relationships they want to have with their government. We want to believe that our voices matter and that our leaders will be held to a high standard of honesty, transparency and accountability. Thank you for your time.

CommentRosmarielle GallardoProposedself-stated2:46:03

Good evening, City Council members. My name is Rosmarielle Gallardo and I am a youth leader with Future Leaders of America. Through our work we encourage young people to participate in their communities and in our democracy. We teach young people that their voices matter, that civic participation is important, and that they have a role in shaping the future of their communities.

But civic engagement depends on trust. When young people see elected officials and public institutions acting with transparency, honesty and accountability it reinforces the belief that participating in our democracy matters. When that trust is broken it can make young people and community members question whether their voices and participation truly make a difference That is why accountability and public service matters. Regardless of political affiliation or personal beliefs, elected officials have a responsibility to uphold the public trust and to demonstrate integrity in their service to the community.

As a young person engaged in civic life I hope our local government continues to set a strong example of what responsible public service looks like. Young people are watching, learning And deciding what kind of relationship they want to have with their government. We want to believe that our voices matter and that our leaders will be held to high standards of honesty, transparency and accountability.

Thank you for your time and for the opportunity to speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:51

There's somebody else get behind to start lining up if there is anybody else.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:47:57

Good evening everyone, Councilman Mayor. I wasn't really going to say anything but seeing our youth here and hearing their voice and then hearing all their concerns about what Accountability looks like. I've come up here before and talked about humanity and what it is to be a man of integrity, and it's really sad that we have to come here again to support these youth, to support our people, our leaders that are asking for accountability.

We shouldn't have to be here wasting our time trying to ask somebody Do what is right. No one has to ask me to do what's right, I wake up knowing what is right and these youth are like they just said they're watching, they're watching what we're doing and when we do this and allow this kind of behavior it shows they could do the same thing why do they need to give a crap? Why do they have to care? You don't care so let's be an example let's put aside whatever our pride or whatever it is that you hold on to Hold on to them, they're our future. Our life is already lived out. Let them live a good life with dignity and integrity.

I support everybody here. I support these youth and please just do the right thing Council. Really take a hold of what we need to do for our community and for this city. Because we all love it, and we all care about it. We just gotta stop going in circles. Just do the right thing. It's not that hard. Thank you.

CommentAlexis OteroProposedself-stated2:49:39

Hi, Alexis Otero here again. It's always weird going up towards the end because everybody has already said the stuff that you've prepared ahead of time so I don't want to be redundant But I do kind of want to mention that it is a bit of a bummer because we did have the kids come out and, you know, because of the way that the agenda was organized they didn't get a chance to speak. And I'm not going to say like oh you did that so they couldn't speak But you know, it is really unfortunate and I would hope that in the future when we do have a hot button issue like this maybe we could put it towards the beginning of the agenda. That way people with time commitments who can't be out at 920 at night can still participate and be included. And that kind of leads me into what I was going to say about this whole thing is that We're not a jury.

We're not judges, but we do as a community need to decide when a situation like this occurs how we're going to handle it, not based on who I'm sorry that you were kind of the guinea pig for this Councilman Bridge, but it is really important that we have this procedure happen and we have something in place. That way in the future when something like this does happen again We have something, you know a precedent that we can establish and look back to and say okay well in the past this is how the city has handled it. And we can handle it again going forward this way.

You know, I think that this Council has the potential to be super competent. And when it does count you guys can step up to the plate and so I just think that going forward we look at what we've done so far and just try to improve on the past. Now being said, we can't take back things that we have done And you know, again this is a public forum. It's not a court of law but I can understand the frustrations that constituents have of being represented by somebody who is under fire and so I would just say before Council gets into this conversation we think about the fact that We need to make sure that whatever standard we establish going forward is a blanket standard, that regardless of the situation can fit going forward. Regardless of our personal feelings on the matter.

Thank you. Have a good night.

2:52 – 2:598 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:41

Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed2:52:51

Good evening, Council. Mayor again, Aaron Crocker, Lompoc resident, dad. I really wanted to wait till closer to the end here for this speaking session because I've been to a lot of these. Y'all don't need to hear again how I feel about this. I think you've heard plenty tonight, plenty from me at other meetings and probably in the multiple hundreds of people that have had comments on this at this point, meetings or otherwise.

One thing, though, that I did notice and I've noticed at every other meeting this has been discussed is that we have a lot of people come up here and say some version of accountability. Do the right thing. Please take some action. The one consistency that I've also seen is that there's nobody up here speaking supporting bridge at all. At all! Maybe there's a meeting where somebody has. I know you've got supporters out here right now, why aren't they up here speaking?

Why haven't they had other meetings? Have you guys thought about that? Because you represent us And everybody that's coming up here speaking is saying the same thing, meeting after meeting after meeting. You haven't heard much else. Maybe you hear it in the streets or backroom conversations or good old boy club bullshit, maybe that. But where are they when it counts?

Why aren't they up here speaking? That should say something too right? They don't want to come up here in front of their other residents and coworkers and say how they feel? Are they ashamed of how they feel? Do they maybe know what the situation is so they don't really want to publicly comment on it, but they'll tell you behind closed doors that they support you. Is that what it is?

I need you guys to think about that when you make this vote tonight, because you represent us. And us is everybody here meeting after meeting talking to you saying the same thing. Take some action. Yeah sure innocent until proven guilty. I believe the quote is I ginned something up right? So sure, we have not been convicted in some court of law but the man himself made the comment. That's a quote from him!

He made it up. There should be some actionable thing there and for supporters of Bridge out there come up here and speak I know you're out there please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:56:01

Anybody else? Did I already ask you about that? Nobody on Teams or phone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:56:11

No, you have not asked yet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:56:13

Let me ask it now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:56:14

Okay. Mayor Mosby there is one additional public comment via Teams. Teams member with the screen name Renee, you will have the opportunity for your public comment just as if you were speaking in person you'll have three minutes for your public comment Teams participant Rene, can you hear us?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:56:40

Yes. Okay. Good evening mayor and council members. My name is Rene. I am a resident of Lompoc and an organizer with 805 UndocuFund. I'm speaking tonight on item 13 because this decision is bigger than one council member, one mayor or one city council. This decision will set precedent for the people who sit in those chairs long after every one of you has gone So this cannot be about friendships. It can not be about political alliances, and it can not be about friends watching over friends.

It has to be about the standard this institution expects from the people entrusted with public office. The people of Lompoc are watching. We're always watching. And whether you agree with it or not, there are residents who have lost trust in the city council That damage has already happened. A censure vote by itself will not repair the trust, but what you do tonight will tell the community whether this council is willing to publicly confront serious questions involving one of its own.

Accountability cannot only apply when it's convenient. It cannot depend on whether the person sitting besides you is your friend, your political ally or anyone you have served with for years. The standard has to remain the same. Council Member Bridge must be allowed to respond to the allegations before you, that is part of a fair process but after hearing that response each of you still has a responsibility to the public not to each other, to us because these seats do not belong to any council member they belong to the people of Lompoc Think about the president you are creating tonight.

Think about the future council members who may face allegations of serious misconduct. Think about the future council that will look back at what you did tonight and ask, what standard did Lompoc establish? Whether this decision you make will become part of that answer, the community deserves transparency The committee deserves consistency and above all, the committee deserves to know that when serious concerns involve someone inside City Hall those concerns will not only simply disappear because addressing them is uncomfortable. You may not be able to restore the trust that has already been damaged tonight but you can demonstrate that the voices of the people of Lompoc still matter so when you make this decision don't make it for yourselves don't make it for your colleagues Make it knowing that the future generations of Lompoc residents will inherit the standard you established tonight.

And it also is...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:59:44

Team's participant Rene, your three minutes is up.

2:59 – 3:054 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:49

Anybody else?

CommentYasmin DawsonProposedself-stated3:00:00

Good evening, my name is Yasmin Dawson. I'm a longtime resident here and a community activist. I am not here tonight to condemn anybody. I am here tonight because I believe our community deserves something that cannot be measured in dollars or votes. When residents elect someone to public office, they are placing their trust in that person. They are saying I trust you to represent me.

I trust you to respect this office. I trust you to put the community before yourself and when that trust is shaken We cannot pretend, sorry. We cannot pretend... I'm sorry. We cannot pretend because the consequences are felt throughout the community. They are felt by the residents who wonders whether their voices matter They are felt by the family that questions whether government is truly accountable.

They are felt by the community members Who keep showing up to meetings, speaking out and participating because they still believe their government can do better. And when that trust disappears people stop participating. They stop showing up. They stop speaking. They stop believing. That is what is at stake. I'm not here to attack anyone personally. I'm not asking the Council to decide any legal matter.

I am asking you to recognize a responsibility that comes with public office, because the question before us is bigger than one person. It is about the credibility of the Council. It is about the confidence of our residents And it is about what message we send to our community. Thank you.

CommentMolly GeraldProposedself-stated3:02:42

We've heard this evening, my name is Molly Gerald. I've lived here since 1985. We've heard from a member of District 1. I live in District 4 and I would just like to thank the council member for my district for making us all aware of the responsibilities that Council has And for keeping this matter before us, I think it took a lot of courage and to develop the document that's before you this evening. Thank you.

CommentSuzy RileyProposedself-stated3:03:31

Hello, my name is Suzy Riley. I've been a resident of Lompoc since 85. Worked in Lompoc Unified School District for 25 years and so when...I've just been listening to everybody. I wasn't planning on speaking but I heard a lot of different value words and one of them was trust And so I think when the community has a trust in their leaders, it's a hopeful act.

They're hoping that y'all and everybody who is in a leadership position has their best interests in mind meaning the decisions you make as a leader Take into account what's in the best interest not of ourselves, not of yourselves but of the community. And that is a decision that is not a light decision. It goes like everyone saying it's above friendship, above colleagues, above everything else.

It's a value system. And so as you make your decision tonight, I'd like you to really think about that. Is the decision in the best interest of the community that's here tonight? Not only, you know there's so many young people here which is really hopeful. They're here as a communication that they are hopeful that you're going to make a decision that's in their best interest.

So I ask you To please do that, don't crush people's hopes because you can't make that tough decision. And if you're not able to make that tough decision tonight about what's truly right then perhaps this is not the correct place for you to serve in the community. Thank you.

3:05 – 3:114 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:05:53

Seeing nobody else rise, we'll close public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:06:01

Councillor Boehme? City Attorney, is it appropriate for me to read the resolution that was put together?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:06:09

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:06:11

So I'd like to take just a quick minute or two to read through this so that everyone who didn't get a chance to read it understands what was put together. And also understands that this is not a judge and jury. This is not a body that determines guilt or innocence, but for the integrity of this institution I feel that this is important to get out there. I would like to thank Council again. I brought this up many many months ago and there was no support I'm just grateful that we were able to gain support to reach this moment. So, I'm going to read the resolution. A resolution of the City Council of the city of Lompoc County of Santa Barbara State of California formally centering council member Stephen Bridge and expressing the City Council's belief that his resignation would serve the best interests of the city whereas members of the City Council of the city of Lompoc are entrusted with significant responsibilities involving public funds, city programs, policy making and maintaining the public's confidence in local government.

And whereas elected officials are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that promotes public trust, accountability, integrity and responsible stewardship And whereas the Santa Barbara County District Attorney has filed multiple felony criminal charges against Councilmember Stephen Bridge, including allegations involving city funds and a city rebate program.

Documents relating to the charges are attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Whereas Councilmember Bridge has pleaded not guilty and denied the allegations against him And the City Council recognizes that he is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law. And whereas, the City Council does not through this resolution make any determination regarding Councilmember Bridge's criminal guilt or innocence which is a matter for the judicial process.

And whereas the allegations are nevertheless of serious concern to the City Council because they involve alleged conduct relating directly to city programs and public funds where Councilmember Bridge serves as an elected representative of the city. And whereas the circumstances surrounding these allegations reasonably risk undermining public confidence in city government and have created a substantial and continuing distraction from the work of the City Council, and the business of the city.

And whereas the City Council believes that protecting the integrity of the City Council as an institution, maintaining the public's confidence in its elected leadership and allowing Council Member Bridge to devote his attention to addressing the pending legal proceedings are important considerations for the City and its residents. Now therefore, the City Council of the City of Lompoc California does hereby resolve as follows.

Section one, the foregoing recitals are incorporated into this resolution. Section two, the city council formally expresses its serious concern and disapproval regarding the circumstances described above and the risk they pose to public trust and confidence in the city and its elected leadership. Section 3. Accordingly, the City Council of the City of Lompoc hereby formally censures Councilmember Stephen Bridge.

Section 4. The City Council further believes that under the present circumstances, the interests of the City of Lompoc, the integrity of the city council and public confidence in local government would be best served by Councilmember Bridge stepping down from his elected position and devoting his attention to resolving the serious legal matters presently before him.

Section 5 This censure and the City Council's expression regarding resignation do not constitute a finding of criminal guilt, interfere with Councilmember Bridge's legal rights or defenses, or prejudge the outcome of the pending criminal proceedings. Section 6. The City Council reaffirms its commitment to transparency, accountability, responsible stewardship of public resources and maintaining the trust of the residents of Lompoc.

And Section 7 is the effective date which would be today. I have a lot that I feel that I could say but I feel it's in this document.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:11 – 3:202 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:11:05

Council Member Bridge?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:11:14

Well I want to thank Council Member Ball, the author of this resolution. I know I have not been an easy colleague. I ask where the money went and why. I ask why we produced a timely report. How our money is spent? I do not support general taxes. I do not approve whatever the staff puts in front of me. And I vote to take unnecessary rules off the backs of people who are just trying to open a business in this town.

And I certainly don't come to council meetings unprepared, so I understand your frustrations. It's kind of him to be concerned about my workload. Let me put that worry to rest for him. My focus is fine, I've never been more focused in my life. I know this city budget better tonight than I did a year ago and I will be in this chair ready to work on every item on every agenda as long as the voters of District 1 want me here.

To the public you have heard the number 20-some felonies it gets repeated around here like the number is the argument Like nobody could rack up a number that big without having done something. So let me tell you how a number like that gets built. I grew up with a picture of how the system works. I think most people in this room share it. The government accuses you, the government proves it with 12 regular people to decide.

That's what we were all taught That picture very rarely happens. More than nine out of 10 felonies, convictions in this country never see a jury. They come from a plea deal. The trial, the evidence, the witnesses, the 12 citizens that's the rare exception. This is what actually happens. Something that could be charged as a misdemeanor gets charged as several felonies Every single count adds more years that you could be facing.

They pile up enough counts and the math gets terrifying, not because their proof is strong, because the risk is enormous. Then comes the offer. Plead guilty to something smaller and all of it goes away. Snow, say no and we're going to add more felonies. That deal is not on the table because the case against you is strong. It's on the table because they would rather not have to prove it.

The pile of charges is to make sure they don't have to, then the rest of the machine engages. You get a digital perp walk. Your name and your face go up online. Not one piece of evidence has been tested Your reputation is gone in an afternoon. Your family is mortified. Strangers who have never met you write and publish vile things about you, and there's nothing you can do about it.

You lose your job. And everybody strolling past thinks the same thing. Well, he must have been something. He must've done something. Where there's fire, there's smoke. Then the bill comes. Finding it takes thousands of dollars and then thousands more. Nobody hands you the money. You pay it out of whatever you have. And when that runs out, the pressure has done its job.

All of this is legal. In 1978, the Supreme Court looked at a prosecutor who told a man he would file much more serious charges if the man refused to plead guilty. The man refused. The prosecutor did exactly what he said he'd do and the court said that's allowed. So let me be clear, this is a system built to stand up Standing up for your innocence isn't expensive and that innocent people give up.

It's not a negotiation, it's not efficiency, it's a pressure put on a human being until that human being breaks. This is not justice, this is torture. I can take it. It has already cost me my job and I'm drawing down my retirement page to pay for it. But I have a house, and I have a business, and I have name in this town that a lot of you knew from something other than this headline.

I can stand here and fight this in public. Most people cannot. Some of the same voices calling for my resignation have said for years that our justice system fails and falls hardest on the people who are poor, on working people, on immigrants. They're right! Some of the... So take everything I just described. Take away the savings. Take away the lawyer you can afford.

You're living paycheck to paycheck. You're a working man with two kids Rent due, you get assigned a public defender who's got hundreds of cases and a stack of felonies counts sitting on your chest. What does that man do? He takes the deal not because he did it but because he has to make the pain stop and he has to protect his family. He signs his name to something he did not do and he carries a felony for the rest of his life, and the paperwork papers recorded as justice.

That happens in courtrooms like ours. It happened long before it happened to me. And most of the time nobody with a microphone is standing in the room when it does. None of this was new to me But it was, kind of knew what had actually happened to me. It brought it home to the council, to all of you sitting up here. We started tonight the way we start every meeting. We stood up, we said the words, the last four words, liberty and justice for all.

And before any of us sat in this chair, we took an oath We swore to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of California. Innocent to proven guilty is not a slogan. It is part of what our constitution guarantees. Think about the standard section four which Councilman Ball just read sets because it's going to outlive me The reason it gives is it's a distraction and a worry about public confidence.

Every accusation ever made against an elected official is distracting, every one of them shakes public confidence. If that's the bar then anybody who wants to remove a member only needs to prepare make an accusation Then the system takes over. So whatever you set today, as the gentleman on the phone said, this is going to last a lot longer than me. Each of you will be living under that same standard and so will whoever sits in these chairs after us.

And understand what doesn't happen if I'm cleared This resolution doesn't undo itself. There is no end date in it, a censure passed on an accusation stays on the books long after the accusation falls apart. You don't want to have the newspaper guys and you're putting my picture on the paper when I'm found innocent. So I'm not asking you to defend me. I'm not asking you to say the charges are false.

You have no way to know that, and you shouldn't pretend you do. I'm asking you to keep the line where the Constitution puts it. Proof first, judgment second. That's all.

3:20 – 3:2814 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:20:56

So I appreciate that response. I think the only reason that I personally, and again this is my own feelings, the reason that I brought this forward is because of your own words and I want to read those words to public record if you'd like to respond. I hope we would give you the time for that. Santa Maria Sun. When asked about past Lompoc City rebate applications he had filled out in 2024 and 2025, Bridge told a Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office investigator that he used a contractor's license number he found on the internet to qualify for more than $10,000 in rebates according to court documents.

They needed a receipt to document the work that was done. So I ginned that thing up, Bridge told the investigator. He was referring to rebate applications tied to a handful of contract repair projects at properties across town completed by himself and his son, neither of whom is a licensed contractor. Bridge knew that the work needed to be performed by a licensed contractor and he knew that had not occurred He further acknowledged that, quote, maybe that's fraud and that it was, quote, probably a little shady.

Unquote. It is not our position to judge your innocence but it is our position to determine whether or not the ethics of this institution is being respected And unless this is completely inaccurate, it does at least for myself make me pause that it isn't just an issue of maybe, maybe not. These are your words Mr. Bridge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:23:09

Councilor Bridge? I can only say those words were taken out of context and anything else should be adjudicated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:23:31

Did we get the independent study on the rebate program itself?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:23:39

The one that the Council requested and we hired the consultant for is expected to be completed at the end of September. And on the Council agenda, October 6th?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:24:00

I'm curious why that question comes up. Is there suggestions of additional fraud that we have not located yet? Is that what we're waiting for?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:07

Well, I think there's a big question. I have some analytics on the rebate program but I didn't want to use my analytics. I want to use independent third party to see what really was going on with this rebate program and is the rebate program First of all, what I've discovered in talking with staff. I don't think staff was at fault. Staff met their objective. Their objective was to conserve electricity, conserve water and we know that the auditor found 11 discrepancies, 11 just not one, just under that one category So in my review of what was going on and what was being accepted in a normal application, this is my concern. Is this a level of normalcy with this application process?

Were we accepting documents applications to be good that we shouldn't have? And where was the fault that happened here and how many people did this? Was this normalcy? In going back through this and looking at it, we actually had about five applications. And this is only looking at about 50 of them where they actually used a plumber that was using a different person's Contractor's license.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:25:42

May I ask you a question? Yeah! So, I definitely hear where you're coming from and you might be surprised to actually find agreement that if we found other people illegally doing something they should be prosecuted as well. I think the difference here Mr. Mayor is we're talking about somebody that's elected to office sitting next to you. Do you have a different standard for our elected officials or are you looking for a way to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:26:03

distract? What I'm looking at is where the hole in the problem was and if we are accepting this to be the norm, and were we not scrutinizing these at the level that should have been? And if we said here's a bad application, why didn't the application get thrown out? That's my curiosity. If somebody had filed a bad application, and the reason why I ask this is because you end up setting traps for people, and there are a lot of people in these applications where the process

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:26:39

was very lackadaisical. And the... So you don't think there's a higher standard for elected officials? We should all be treated

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:27:01

the same. I think you try to hold yourself to a higher standard, that's correct. You have to eat a lot of crow in a lot of situations. I certainly agree. You're correct. I agree with you. I certainly agree that we should hold ourselves to a higher standard. I agree there should be levels but here's the point of concern is and I'm going to bring this up why as such.

First of all wasn't gonna go to this level but I'd heard about this before it even went to the DA When did I hear about it and how did I hear about it? I didn't know what it was. I just heard somebody saying we got one on Councilmember Bridge now. How about that? Can you state your sources? I'm not going to tell you who it was. Then why does it matter? Because if you guys want to parlay outside, go ahead. Not inside here, okay?

My concern is... That sounds like gossip. Listen, you asked me my question because there was an active movement to go after Councilmember Bridge. There was a gloating about getting him. From who? I'm not going to tell you, the point of fact is they knew that there were 11 accounts that had this. They went after one person.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:28:10

Eleven accounts that had what? A discrepancy or a significant fraud?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:16

That was by the auditor just the auditor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:28:18

and one of those We have 11

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:21

fraudulent applications.

3:28 – 3:3310 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:28:45

If I recall correctly, I believe the audit said that it had found 11 applications that either did not have contractor license numbers or had incorrect contractor license numbers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:29:02

Did we have any proof from anyone that any of those contractor licenses were found on the internet? And were any of those people elected officials sitting on this dais?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:29:15

Well, one or two of them were Councilmember Bridge. And I do not think we have any proof that any of the numbers were found on the internet now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:29:27

The point is that I was very concerned about that. I asked about it. We finally got a document in February, wasn't it? That identified back to a document that was out in December. And my point of concern is What is going on here? I asked at that time, is there any more? And in April we asked for more. What else is out there? We asked, well, I think it was April resident for the analytics of the whole system of two years of audits of what's going on with the program.

And the reason why I'm going down this is that what I see here and I'm not excusing Council Member Bridgette. What I'm seeing here is this program was trapping And when we see a lot more coming out, you will see that are we going to do the same thing to the other people? Are we going to go down the same slippery slide? You guys.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:30:27

I've suggested that. I've suggested that, Mr. Mayor, you know that if we found fraud in any criminal activity from anyone, I have been on record saying that they should be prosecuted the same way. Again, point you back to the difference between those other folks and somebody that's an elected official on this dais. You're telling me that it's no harm, no foul because everyone else might have done something.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:30:50

Let me finish here. So in talking with city staff City staff had the overruling authority over the third party in Sacramento, and the applications could be approved at their discretion. The application was approved at the discretion of an individual because the objective of this was to make sure that the money went out and projects were done. And I asked the individual so you could overrule if the person in Sacramento said It wasn't good and if you could write a wrong application at your discretion, he said yes.

And that becomes very complicated when we have a staff member saying yeah okay your spirit of that is there and one of them here paraphrasing what it was stated that We know the guy wasn't a contractor who did the rebates, because a lot of the landscape rebates were done by their handyman or their gardeners. Okay? A lot of them were done that way and there's the comments where well we know this guy is doing the job, we know he got it done.

The photos show that it was done, we're good. And that was what was going on in the rebate program, is that lackadaisical. We've since corrected it. We've trued up a lot of forms. We got the old forms out of the container out there and we've aligned things up. But that's the way the program was being run and many people filed applications that had flaws in them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:32:32

So if the district attorney finds additional fraud from anyone who took advantage of our rebate program, I think that is justified. That they should face penalty and they should face their day in court. I think that's completely fair. Again, I just challenged the mayor in this circumstance with all due respect. If I had been charged with one felony Charged, innocent until proven guilty, due process. If I'd been charged with a one, felony.

Would I get the same defense from our mayor? I don't think so and so I again ask the mayor and this council why are we trying to talk about folks that are not elected? That you heard something or staff said something and all of this When we have the charges that are public, we have statements that are public. We have three invoices that were produced by a member of this council that are fraudulent. It's in the attachment. I just wonder... Did you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:33:39

review any of the other applications that were presented to us?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:33:43

How many of those people are elected?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:33:45

You know what? You can go outside if you'd like. You've had your time to speak. I just wonder.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:34 – 3:4029 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:34:28

Anything else? If it's found to be true what has been charged against a sitting City Council person, are you okay with that? Are you okay to sit here- Are you okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:34:45

if he's found to be innocent?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:34:47

Are you okay with this? I will go knock on doors for Mr. Bridge if he's found to be innocent. It's on public record. I will say that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:34:57

I mean, an allegation is an allegation. And that's what gets complicated here. What you do with your censorship? You've asked him, he stepped down from his commissions, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:35:11

He's still voting on things that involve public funds when there are questions

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:35:18

about his actions. What is this question about public funds? What directly do you have about questions that he had? We don't write checks. We don't touch

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:35:28

the money. Mr. Mayor, you asked me to go and read some other applications I would just submit. I would ask for you to go and read the evidence.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:35:35

I've read everything that you presented, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:35:40

I'll leave it at that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:35:41

And there are still allegations. And I don't think that allegations As I said before, anybody could come with allegations and you're gonna take somebody out.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:35:55

Does it bother you that a member of the city council admitted to some of these things? It does. How much does

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:36:01

it bother you? You're correct, it does bother me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:36:04

Enough to do what?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:36:07

My point of concern is that you're asking here. So what do you gain with your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:36:11

censorship? Tell me, what do you gain by doing this? You know what I gained by actually standing up for what's right is actually giving some integrity back to the people of Lompoc who trust their leaders to do the right thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:36:26

You guys, I've asked you to be nice we can clear the chambers if you'd like. I've asked, could you please remove

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed3:36:37

her?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:36:44

I've asked several times. I've

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed3:36:46

asked you nice. This is trust, point blank period. Elected official broke trust with the community. Community wants answers. You are standing up there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:37:16

acting like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed3:37:17

you're judge and jury. We don't want judge and jury! We want leadership. Period. Point blank. Enough.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:37:36

So getting back to what we accomplished by doing this, what do you physically... What really happened? You have the trust aspect you're saying but you ask him to step down. He doesn't have to. What else do you gain by doing this? A record of doing the right thing. If you ask him to step down he's still here so what happens? What's the difference? It's council having

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:38:05

the guts to do the right thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:38:07

What is the right thing? It's your determination of what is the right thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:38:12

Council has at its disposal a method of showing it's disapproval of the actions of a sitting city council person It is one of our options. This is not us making something up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:38:23

I don't have any problem with saying, I disapprove of you filling out a bad application. You screwed up. It apparently looks...I have no problem with that aspect of it but what do you gain by anything else here? We've already told him that he's already said he's going to get his time in court I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:38:40

think the question is not what I gain, it's trying to recover what this community has lost. And that is trust and it's been months and months of slowly bleeding trust in this council to lead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:38:56

Again, I'm asking you where here does this give you the trust? What part of your resolution gains trust? I'd like to make a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:39:05

motion to pass the resolution. I'd like to make a resolution or make a motion to pass the Resolution of Century. Again, it is not a judgment. We're not a judge and jury but it shows our disapproval as a council that there is a bar that should be held. There is a standard that we should all strive for, and unfortunately in this case I'm very concerned that that trust has been really, really injured. And I think the statements of the community today show that that trust has been broken.

So I'm hoping that we can make a gesture even though it is toothless, it's powerless, we cannot force anything but it is council making a statement about what it believes is right versus what it believes is wrong period. That's my motion. Council Member Vega.

3:40 – 3:448 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:40:14

I have some questions here. One of the concerns is the censorship to a city attorney, if it is proven after the fact that he has proven innocent does that censorship get removed or as he stated is it permanent?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:40:38

If Council Member Bridges ultimately found innocent and the council wanted to, you could rescind the censure resolution. You could adopt a resolution saying this censure was canceled and we were wrong but if you don't do that then it'll stay on the books.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:40:53

And I'm more than happy to include that verbiage in this resolution again if he's found innocent I will be one of the first people to apologize and to knock on doors and tell people we did the wrong thing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:41:04

Well, first of all I have respect for each and every one of you in whatever position you're in. By the rule of law the thing that I know for sure that there is a difference being in a leadership position. I know all of us got elected and I know that if someone did not have faith or trust or believed I had integrity I would not be fulfilling my duty And this is exactly what I would get, you know, regardless of innocence.

So I know there's a difference. We're up here. We take an oath and we... But again the concern is anybody can be falsely accused but I think that we need to set some sort of a standard here that says as far as the community is concerned, the public trust needs to be restored to a point of at least They're okay until the final outcome comes up, because we all know that you're presumed innocent till proven guilty. So my point is I do understand that there's a leadership, there's a difference between leadership so I do support the fact that something needs to be done for the future and anybody else that sits in this seat has nothing to do with being personal here with Mr. Bridge.

This is just a standard that I would have thought would already have been in place So I think with that and the resolution as far as the censorship, you know, as far as him being asked to step down we have no power to ask him to step down except to ask. So as a leader with my leadership hat on I have to support the community and their trust. I have to say you guys are right, you guys don't have the faith or trust regardless of the outcome of the trial but personally Mr.

Bridge is innocent so far until proven guilty but as far as the council's concerned I have to agree with the public on why we're here I want you guys to trust each and every one of us. And if that's been flawed, then we need to take some sort of action so that you know that you're being heard, so you know that things are being done correctly. So with that, I do give you a second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:43:50

Motion by Ball and seconded by Vega. You haven't. Your bridge, you got

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:44:23

it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:44:31

And that's 2-2 with 1-0. Who is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed3:44:33

removing?

3:45 – 4:028 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:45:17

Item number 14. Michael Lowe, Building and Safety Service Manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed3:45:54

Thanks for just getting some dual presentations up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:46:00

Do you have some lights and some music or something? A strobe light going on here or something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed3:46:06

I'll go ahead and just get started. Michael Lowe, Building and Safety Services Manager. This evening we're bringing an item before the Council for consideration that's going to help the building division move forward with this strategic plan. It is going to cover our intention to pursue grant funding through what's known as the 21st Century Road to Housing Act As well as ask the council to approve a $0 contract with an AI firm called each plan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:47:17

Thank you for your patience. We're trying to load the separate presentation, the PowerPoint.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed3:47:37

I'm trying to think of the order that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:47:38

my slides are in so that I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed3:47:39

can get started. So I'll just go ahead and get started by discussing a little bit of my background with AI in the industry. Almost two years, since January of 2025. Before that I first heard about AI in the industry around middle of 2022. There's some firms that overseas were trying to develop AI tools to do plan review digitally to automate the process and then In early 24, while I was the building official of another jurisdiction, I started working with a research firm out of Stanford that was trying to develop similar technology.

And what we found is that a lot of the concerns about housing, about red tape, about the process for approving projects was not unique to California. It was pretty prevalent throughout the country. But the problem that these startups were facing was actually working with government. And so many of them that would start out coming to government, working with us, they couldn't get contracts, they couldn't go through the procurement process at the same rates that venture capitalists or startups would otherwise want to see to prove a concept.

And so what a lot of them did at that time was turn away from government and start working with private sector architects. And there was kind of a miss there because the technology that I was seeing, they were trying to develop processing tools using AI. And so then to turn away from government where you're focusing on permit processing now you're focusing on plan development while working with AI.

And so for about a year after I was working with this research team, I was receiving phone calls. Two or three phone calls a month of all these different startups that were trying to produce new software. And then in December of 24, I received a call from Ichi and it was significantly different in the approach that they were taking. They weren't looking to automate a permit process. They were looking to use AI to develop tools specifically for building officials.

Code research was the primary focus. The California Building Code consists of over 40,000 codes. There's 12 volumes. I should have rolled in a card here to show you but it's about this wide of paper. And so I was very intrigued because I had never heard of this before and asked for a demonstration. About three minutes into the demonstration, I stopped this demonstration and said I need to get a lot of other eyes on this technology.

And beginning in January 25th, I started piloting it. That was about the same time that I heard of the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, which is recently come into law in July of this year. Sorry, I don't have all the specifics because I had the details on this slide so I'm doing the best I can. And this bill is, I think it was voted 85 to 5 approval in the Senate, U.S. Senate and I share that because it includes in it some very competitive grant opportunities one that's called the Innovation Fund.

And with how sweeping of legislation this is, I anticipate it being highly competitive and taking the opportunity that we have with the adoption of the strategic plan to align our operations with what is listed in the legislation for what will qualify us to receive grant funding. The purpose of that innovation fund is to identify very specific things that jurisdictions can do to streamline building approvals so that you can develop more housing more quickly.

And so a few of those things that are a good example would be, a lot of the legislation that we actually already have to adopt from the state of California. So just being a city in California kind of gives us a competitive edge on the policy front. But then there are also other things in there like adopting advance technology to streamline those efforts. So that's what the EG contract will represent this evening.

It is our attempt to align our operations with a modern building department that will qualify us for that funding. Some other things that already make us a real unique and competitive applicant is that the innovation fund isn't typical grant funding where you will list, hey I want to do these things X Y Z go ahead and give me can we have some money to do that?

That is part of the application process, where we will have to identify specific ways to apply for the funding. But the qualifier is that there are specific things that the jurisdictions are already doing to prove that you are innovative as a community. And so for example, the reduction of the impact fees. That is something that's explicitly listed not impact fees but reducing costs for permitting explicitly listed.

Seeking to streamline environmental review policies. The state of California has taken care of that for us and then also locally we are petitioning the state for a waiver for cost effectiveness for solar mandate in the code. There are other things that already the City of Lompoc is doing as well, and ultimately the goal is to prove that it's working to produce more housing.

The numbers that we have—very little single-family home production in the last couple of years to now having 350 in production—is another thing that will be able to show on an application. These aren't things that I'm just dreaming up. explicitly listed in the legislation. Okay, yeah and on the call I have the CEO and founder of the company Brandon Levy on the call as well this is actually his portion of the presentation so apologize for the technology issues that we're experiencing but What I want to say is there is a lot of questions right now in the industry about AI, about how it can be used responsibly.

There's a lot of opportunity here and so if you guys have concerns personally, I have... Here it is! I talked a lot, so I don't know. Okay. All right. I'll just speed through if you want to go back one slide. So this is all stemming from the strategic plan. October 21st was when you guys started that. July 7th of this year is when you adopted it And we're currently working to implement. On September 2nd, we had another developers roundtable and I presented the idea of utilizing AI as part of it with our developers. We had a small turnout but all of them said anything that makes the process faster is better and I said what about cost? And they said faster is better.

And so that was the resounding I shared with you about the 21st Century Road to Housing Act and Innovation Fund. Go to the next slide. Okay, so this is the criteria that's listed and some of the exact things that we're already doing in Lompoc that would qualify us for this grant funding and so I'm just trying to continue now through the strategic plan strategically build our application for this potential opportunity And so this is what it would be helpful to hear the council discuss this evening on this item. These are the things that the money can be used for if and when we apply for funding, direct funding for new construction, for affordable attainable housing, real property acquisition specifically for residential adapted reuse which is a very interesting concept taking commercial buildings turning them into residential public land inventory databases, capital investments, transit street reconstruction and then updating municipal zoning codes digital workflows code compliance.

So these are some of the things that the grant money could be used for that our department would be chasing through this effort. Next slide thank you okay so now back to AI We wanted to, or I wanted to be very transparent. I started working for Ichi AI in June of 2025. I spent about six months working with them. In that time, I got to primarily do sales but I got to work with about three dozen different building departments across mostly the state of California, a couple outside the state and so I got to hear about what the actual pain points were I got to help them use AI to solve some of those problems and I got to make a lot of friends in the industry as well. And so, I worked for them for six months that information is reported on my form 700 all my disclosures have been made and I hold no financial interest in the company and then the draft agreement that we have before you has a one-year post term no solicitation clause Not like we're trying to set something up here to have them employees go jump over and work for the company.

So, the purpose of EG being a part of the strategic plan is that it directly fulfills the scoring factors within the grant application I'm interested in pursuing. And so we would be actively adopting next generation review infrastructure and specifically to attain our key performance indicators in the strategic plan What we want to accomplish with this AI tool is to be able to tell a win-win-win story on our grant application. And who is that?

While we were adopting the strategic plan, there was questions about staffing levels. There was questions about operations and so the first win would be the applicant. They want something faster. They want something cheaper and so that's going to be one of the goals. Another win would have to be the city staff and so anytime we talk about AI right now people are concerned about their jobs. They're concerned about being replaced And the reality is anytime we're talking about efficiencies in government, that's a reduction in the workforce.

80 to 90% of municipal government's budgets are typically staffing. And so if you're going to reduce fees, it's going to reduce people. Right now we're in a very unique situation in the industry where we don't actually have new people coming into code regulation and in Lompoc especially, it is very difficult to get people to do this work here And so we're in a really unique situation where the workload is increasing significantly, and we're seeing this in the number of permits we're getting as well as the revenues that the city is generating. But we're also in a place where we're not ready to hire on full-time staff because we don't know how long that's going to continue for yet.

The trends that we have are just very, very short term right now and so the next win would be for staff which if staff can complete more work in a short amount of time utilizing advanced technology then the idea would be their jobs are higher paying jobs And so before we would add staff, we would look to invest into the current staff we have to develop those skills. To start bringing more attractive jobs to Lompoc. And then the next win would be we would not want each or any of our contractors unpaid for eternity. So while this contract is a zero dollar contract, the term is through the end of June of next year and at that time we would reassess whether they actually were able to create efficiencies in our systems to reduce fees to the point where they could charge us for the services.

And so there is a math equation here to look for, but it's essentially what the grant application is looking for in jurisdictions permitting processes. How do we still invest into staff, reduce costs as well as increase efficiencies? And so that's what we're looking to do with Ichi. I think the next slide is Ichi's presentation, so we'll go ahead and switch over and see if we can get Brandon on the call for us.

And Brandon will share with you more about his company.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:02 – 4:125 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:02:46

Brandon are you able to hear us? Brandon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed4:03:04

Oh, there we go is that working?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:03:07

Yes, we can hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed4:03:09

Oh great thank you. Yeah I'll just jump right in is it on the slide that Ichi City of Lompoc slide? I'm not able to see it so I just want to confirm. Yeah, thank you all. And yeah, I think you offer the time and in the introduction Mike just have about 5 minutes of slides to go through so a little bit about me. Um, I grew up in construction. My dad had HVAC business for most of my life and it's always been something that's been near and dear to my heart. Other part of my background, I worked in tech for the last 20 years. So prior to Ichi had a different startup for a decade and then also as a general manager and lead at Square before starting Ichi full time next slide.

So the reason that we started the company is, we have a very deep belief that there's an opportunity to use technology to help build better cities of the future. And for me most notably, that means aiding in cities to build cities that have greater sense of community economic opportunity and access to human needs inclusive of housing for all. There's a lot of ways of going about that but over the long arc of the business, we really just want to have our thumb on the scale to help make that better in the world.

Next slide. So, as Mike was mentioning around Lompoc and what we see in every community is that we believe everybody really deserves a fast and consistent and predictable permitting process. And this is something that is a constant topic of conversation across the country in many different jurisdictions, arguably all of them. However, there's an asymmetry that exists where it's not just about the work that needs to be done. There is a very high degree of complexity and variability in the work, and there's an ever-decreasing workforce that can actually do this work. So Lompoc and its ability to staff for the roles or the like is something that every jurisdiction is struggling with in terms of getting high quality plan examiners, or permit techs, or other roles.

Notably the International Code Council which is the primary code publishing organization in the U.S., consistently produces studies that 80% Officials in the building industry or code compliance officials are nearing or reaching retirement in the next decade. And so there's a huge gap, in terms of the work to do to build up the buildings and infrastructure within cities and that people that can actually ensure that it is going to be compliant for life safety and accessibility.

Next slide. We are a startup, and we move quickly even with our small team. But even in the short time span that our company has been around, we've already been able to develop relationships with a number of different cities, notably across California like in the Central Valley will work with the city of Merced or San Luis Obispo close by like down in LA area there's Beverly Hills Chino hills, and we work with both city and county of Sacramento. So nearly 40 or so jurisdictions across the state of California, and then also work with a number of different plan review firms that are reviewing thousands or tens of thousands of projects a year inclusive of building departments and fire districts as well next slide.

So the way that we look at AI, I think there's this bit of a misnomer where it's going to automate away all of our work. We do see a lot of opportunities for automation and some of those more repetitive tasks but in this particular domain, we really look at how do we build tools that enable the building official or the plan examiner or the permit tech To reduce or remove that road work, and then for the more technical work that they need to do. That really requires the discretion of the individual to give them the tools that they need better faster, more efficiently than they could before next slide.

And so the kind of things that we'll do at ECE, yeah as noted on the slide it's not about doing the review itself but it's about taking in all the project documents being able to integrate into your GovTech solution. So in this case the Tyler EPL product organized that information in an easy and very efficient way hopefully to be able to give feedback very quickly to the internal staff or to applicants depending on Provide some initial checks and guidance, draft initial letters so that people aren't starting from scratch but rather getting the documentation and artifacts that they need given to them more on a silver platter so that they complete their work in a better way than they could before.

Next slide The way that we've built our tool is not focused on one particular project type or one particular set of codes. We support codes at the national, state level, local municipal level for local municipal amendments and a number of other specific categories as well. And we're also agnostic to which project type it is. So whether it's a single family home or addition being built, TI or even a large scale commercial building or tower that would be being built, we're able to help customize workflows based on the ability of what the AI is able to do today or what it's going to be able to do in the very near future to be able to handle those different cases.

Hopefully aligning nicely with the variability of the different types of construction that are going on today and in the near future, and the city is Lompoc as well. Next slide just final 2 slides I'll wrap it up. So, at the end of the day this is all about doing more with the team that you have. So enabling the permit techs and plan examiners also inspectors and building official to be able to provide a higher quality of service for the community.

Oftentimes we'll hear of building departments that can spend upwards of 80% of their time on administrative tasks and inspections and code enforcement things of that sort So, we really want to help reduce that burden to take those things that take hours and turn them into minutes. And that in turn will enable the staff to provide a greater level of service to the community. And then finally is to help ramp new staff faster. And this is something that we see in some jurisdictions like Stockton as a good example where more junior plan examiners or permit techs have been able to gain a deeper grasp of the code and the technicalities related to it As well as navigating the nuances within a particular jurisdiction, much faster than they could before because the AI is able to help them get there.

It doesn't become the thing that replaces their work rather it becomes that thing that helps empower it. And then finally, on the next slide is there's a lot of I think conversation every single week. I think around AI and the safety and security related to it especially given our role working with local government across the country. We also work with architectural firms that have clients with high degrees of sensitivity to the information that they are giving any system And we have built a system that it will not train any AI models on the data that is put into the system.

It ensures that staff are actually reviewing outputs, this isn't automatically reaching out to the community or applicants but keeping the control within the city as well and as well as a number of other factors for how we store and encrypt data and the like Um, where the AI is not given any blind ability to go do its own work. Or I think there's been a lot of topic of conversation of AI being able to hack things on its own. Our system is built in a very different way and a much more narrow way for these specific purposes to help remove the risks associated with that and to be able to have a system with reasonable guardrails and restrictions on it to be able to serve your community well.

So that's the end of my slides, sorry to take a little bit longer than five minutes but hopefully it gives you a good general overview of each and I'm happy to answer any questions related to that or how we would envision it within Lompoc itself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:11:58

Yeah if the council has any specific questions for Brandon based on his company now would be a great time. I have a couple more slides to talk about the agreement and he'll stay on the call for questions at the end too so feel free.

4:12 – 4:1912 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:12:16

So I'm a big proponent of this. As I was hearing the presentation, and perhaps this is in the roadmap but a big value proposition to both sides while it might not be immediately This is a has been trained on what we care about. That would be a huge gain, I don't know if that's in their roadmap or

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:12:58

not. So one of the things and actually we could ask Brandon about it too but one of the things that we've talked about either requested is being able to release it to the public there are some jurisdictions, I don't know if Brandon's working with any that are doing this with ECHI but there are some jurisdictions that are starting to put AI chat tools on their website for that purpose, and they are also integrating AI tools within permitting software so they could do like a pre-screen. So we are working on the pre-screen part but Brandon, do you have any public facing version of EG yet?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed4:13:42

Um, we don't have a public facing version of each in terms of the main product. But we actually do now have some public facing versions of some more bespoke applications. So for example. We do have a public facing version of an application that allows people to submit the comment letters that they receive from jurisdictions and help them understand it and give them greater ability to change it.

And we are working with other folks on more like public facing portals. I do want to emphasize though, especially with this relationship with Lompoc is we'll build some custom stuff for you too. So it's less about rolling out a more of a generic interface and more of a question of what would suit your city's needs best in order to be able to deliver that to the applicant.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:14:39

So I'm a huge fan of AI. I think we use it in different ways and it's been pretty cool to see how it can be so helpful and add productivity to something. You're on a video for this company from your past employment in San Luis Obispo, are they still using it there? Can you speak to how it helped? That's a year ago, so I'm curious.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:15:00

So I was on that video like three days after I started working for EG as the former chief building official of San Luis Obispo Brandon you can you speak to your customers? Are they still

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed4:15:18

oh Yeah, yeah, there's still the customer we actually have a training with them in a couple of weeks With the new building official there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:15:25

Yeah. Just clarifying, so you did a video only working there for three days or something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:15:30

No no no on my third day... So I started working there in June of 2025 and it was like my third day that I did that video. I started working with ECHI as the chief building official in San Luis Obispo in January of 25. So I started to pilot it. Brandon was looking for pilot participants and so I started that and then six months later I went to go work

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:15:56

No stress, thank you for clarifying. As far as I'm concerned there's no harm in trying something especially because it's in the interest of the company should it work and add efficiencies or give us access to grants or help us build towards something it should pay for itself and if it doesn't we should move on so I have no problem with that I think it's great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:16:14

Great! I do have a couple more slides Okay, so just in terms of what the agreement is staff would have access to their AI assistant which is tailored specifically to building planning and fire. And so what they've done is not only bring in the California standards but also Lompoc Municipal Code And so we can then just use that in the same way that you guys probably use AI to help us generate work products, written products very quickly.

Within the terms this is a zero dollar pilot term that will be through the end of this fiscal year and the city will retain 100% of all the data and effort that we put into it. So if I generate any prompts that will eventually be used or disseminated to the public Pre-screen or anything like that, we keep all that information. And I would anticipate that by March we understand if this proof of concept works or not so that we could come back for a recommendation for another contract for the next fiscal year. And then the way that this works is it's cloud-based software, so we don't have to download anything. We don't have to install any type of infrastructure and we vetted it with Tyler Technologies as well as Citi IT.

They've concurred in supported I will say that There are, of course, hesitations. Just new technology and so we are taking precautions with security and safety but IT does support this moving forward. So the recommendations are on the screen. Happy to answer any additional questions. I'm happy to receive any feedback on the grant opportunities as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:18:22

Can you go back one slide please? So $0 pilot term, what does that become after the fact?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:18:33

The contract will end, and so we would have to come back with a new contract. The way that I'm envisioning it right now is there's a very specific fee that we are charging. It's between $92 and $551, and it's on every single permit application. It called the Permit Processing Fee. Last year, we collected about $120,000 in revenues of that fee. In the year before that, it was about $90,000.

And so we're seeing it increase because of the workload in the community. And so, the goal would be to see if the AI could tackle the work that that fee is covering and if that's the case then what we should be able to do is reduce the cost of that fee down substantially, be able to invest into staff with higher wages to monitor the AI for that work and be able to do that work much quicker.

4:19 – 4:2713 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:19:44

What's the price point now on a city of our size? Let's just get a rough order of magnitude we're heading for.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:19:51

Yeah, so the way that I was setting up sales was actually per user. It was like $200 a month per person. This model that we're actually looking to develop will be tied to the permit. So right now since we're charging Anywhere from $92 to $551 for permit processing, we would just tackle that fee. So if we could reduce that fee 50%. then a portion of that would be what we're paying each for the service.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:20:27

So just for clarity, that was a lot of words. The rough order magnitude is a couple hundred dollars a permit? Is that what you just said or did I read into it what I wanted to hear?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:20:41

We don't know. We believe that the technology could increase the efficiency for what we are charging for right now, and if that's the case then we'll have to come up with I'm

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:21:16

AI can find a lot more mistakes than a person can, and it'll get better and better. If we don't come up with some way that the developers, the submitters or whatever, the architects can have insight into those mistakes before they start paying money in Because one of the biggest frustrations for developers is to get back 100 questions. And I can easily imagine AI on any plant I've seen come back with comments that, yes they're real and not taking them away but they probably would have never come back.

So that would be my, I just would put that concern in kind of your.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:22:05

Yeah just to reiterate your feedback would be you're interested in an AI tool that would give access to applicants to pre-screen their plans

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:22:18

or at least some methodology The submitters aren't fighting superhuman intelligence. They'll never get their plans through because it's always going to be a mistake. Oh, I see what you're saying. So it's a two-part component to that, right? If I could put it in and then I see my hunter but I've never talked to you and I could go work them, maybe that wouldn't be so bad. But I still could get a lot back from an AI

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:22:47

machine. Yeah, I understand that. I'll take note of that and when I come back for an update, I'll have an answer on how we will address that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:23:05

Yeah, just real quickly and maybe the owner is still on. So the pricing online it says you know like 20 bucks a month, 100 bucks a month, 500 bucks a month are custom. There's a whole idea of credits. It suggests that for 500 bucks a month that's for mid-sized teams and departments running daily. Obviously you might want to customize some things. I actually do agree. I think it's important even if Because you said it earlier, you weren't hearing a lot of people saying lower the fee. They were saying faster is better, faster is better, faster is better. So if they could approach you with plans and have you pre-run it through and get that feedback on where adjustments needed to be made sooner, to me that's a service from the city that helps with the bigger picture of faster growth, faster build outs, gets stuff done right?

So for me I'd be a fan of that but maybe understanding If it was a thousand bucks a month, that might pay for itself too. I just need to learn more about the credits or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:24:03

whatever. Yeah and so what I would say is... And Brandon, I'll ask you to chime in because I haven't looked at his website for pricing since I've worked with the company. That is not the agreement that we're setting up? And but it sounds like what you guys are, what I'm hearing is you would want something in addition to a cost recoverable service that is just available to assist future applicants.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:24:33

I think that's also what you're pushing. You feel like your mandate from the city is to work harder, work faster, get stuff done, let's go, go, go. So again if there's a way for this technology to help us as a city provide faster service and turnaround times, builders are happier, developers are happier because there's less uncertainty, they know what they have to change, I think that's a win for everyone. Again, I'd be a big fan of that. We do have one more question in this if he's still on Mr.

Brandon Levy. Startups come and go all the time. What happens if this one flops, God forbid, fails, goes away? How long has this been in existence? Does he see this having a long run?

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:25:19

Yeah and I've been working with him since January 25. You were like six months in at that time so it's just over two years now that he's been in business. If you'd like to come in and see how it works, it's essentially a chat bot that you guys probably use very similar technology. It's just purpose built for the team and so the worst case scenario that I see in this agreement is we get to use this advanced technology in the division for no cost and we get to train employees on how to responsibly use AI in government operations And so it's not without risk of some sort, which is why we have the agreement for protections because there's insurance involved in that.

But at the same time I don't see if Ichi wasn't here tomorrow, I don't see that putting us back at all. and then just going back to the pricing point real quick, nothing that I actually propose would be simply funded by the general fund. Building and Safety Division is all cost recoverable services that are funded by applicants What I'm looking at right now with this tool, since we're not proposing to pay for any services is that it would only serve and be funded by applicants when they come into the process.

So we need to make it so efficient that we could reduce costs and pay for this service.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:27:03

Sounds good to me. Worth a try.

4:27 – 4:3638 turns

CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction4:27:10

Yeah, I'll go ahead and make a motion we extend the meeting a half hour.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:27:18

I'll second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:27:18

it. Slow down, slow down, slow down Tiger. Where's your seconding button? It's supposed to be extended until 1030 correct? 1130 I mean. 1130 right? Okay. Go ahead vote. Come on Vega vote! We're waiting. Sorry we have a curfew, so we had to extend our curfew. Vegas says no.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:27:51

I just had one quick comment for you to put in your future file to address Councilman Ball's concern of the startup. My experience has been the way you address that is you have some kind of code and escrow so you don't get crippled if somebody goes down.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:28:11

Sorry, could you explain that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:28:13

Yeah. Whatever the code is that you're running, Python or whatever it is, it gets put in escrow when you sign a contract and then should they go away your IT guys can pick up the code but it only executes if they go down so it's kind of no risk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:28:40

Quick statement from, I remember 2016-2017 we were really slow. And I think at that time we lost maybe 600, 800 thousand in our department because the difference here is you're not paying for somebody to sit in a seat waiting correct? That's right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed4:28:56

yeah so each would only get paid if we have permits coming through the system.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:01

Yeah so it was that roller coaster they can help all the way around and Lompoc is up and down We're going to have a public comment session. And then we're going to have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:29:09

rollercoaster. So what's the direction you're looking for? Public comment next. Oh, sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:15

About that one. And they open up public comment. Anybody on teams or phones.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:29:23

There is no

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:30

This item, this item. Only this item. See nobody raise their foot but close public comment bring it back to the council for directions motions otherwise

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:29:40

I'd like to make a motion to take staff's recommendation

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:44

both of them right yep okay there you go push the motion button who's seconding it Starbucks seconded motion by bridge go vote

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:30:04

And 5-0. Home

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed4:30:08

run.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:30:12

Hold on, huh? Get us a Mito and a coffee, you'll be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:30:17

all right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:30:18

You'll be all right, you won't turn into a pumpkin. Now we've got to bring back item number 10, right? Are we on number 10? Written communications. Any written communications? And then I'll get item 10, right?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:30:33

Nothing more than you've already received. All right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:30:34

now we go to item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:30:35

number ten, correct? And I can make it really quick if you need. Sure, because I pulled it unless you wanted to make a speech about it.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:30:49

Mayor Mosby, members of the council this is an item that is A resolution approving an amendment number three to the LPOA's MOU, which includes the addition of health insurance contribution rates as well as a 5% incentive for the drone as first responder pilot for the community services officer that operates the drone as first responders. And I'm open for any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:31:24

Yeah, the only reason I pulled it. There's been several people have reached out to me that obviously we're having some issues with the name flock and I wanted to just ask a question now there's a, I actually have the privilege of teaching one of the first drone classes at Allan Hancock I'm very aware of this technology. This technology is completely different than license plate reader technology, is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:31:47

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:31:49

It's not dissimilar from the technology that would exist on a sheriff's helicopter, police helicopter?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:31:55

Correct. Well we're never gonna have a budget for a helicopter so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:32:03

A little one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:32:04

Yeah, a drone helicopter maybe. No it's a way to The way I best explain it, it's interactive where if a license plate reader hits a stolen car, the dispatcher will tell the pilot and it'll automatically go to the area of that and start looking for the car. But other than that, it's not a license plate reader. It doesn't get to float around. It's a reactive tool.

The benefit to the city is that it can get anywhere in the city within 90 seconds, typically. So it's going to slow down emergency vehicle operations when the pilots over the top of it he can see if something or another and it could slow, if it's nothing like you get a report of a traffic collision with injuries he gets over the top of it and there's no injuries there. The police officer that's going lights and siren can now turn it down and not take risk in trying to get to something to help people with injuries Help somebody that might be suffering a gunshot wound, a stabbing victim.

You know but also when it does get over the top faster he can find directions of where the suspect is in just the short time we've had it we've been able to already have some day one while in training a lady with the felony warrant hiding behind a fence the police officers went right by her this was over the top so you guys just walked right past violent history, violent tendencies. We're able to take her into custody safely.

So it's a game changer. We don't have money to get a bunch more officers. This helps us have a better resource to get over the top of situations quicker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:34:01

So for anyone that's in the community that's worried about privacy or any of those issues or transparency can you talk to either of those issues?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:34:10

Yes so when the drone The pilot will put in an address to where the drone is going. It flies there with a high visual horizon, meaning that it goes up to the altitude it needs to fly at. Here we're only allowed to go up to 200 feet because to go up to 400 feet would require another $150,000 a year so we obviously didn't do that. And when it flies straight to the destination, once it gets over top of it, it'll tell the pilot where it's at and he's watching over a map.

Once he gets over the top of the call then it looks down and it doesn't get to just stay up there and float around. When it's done with that call, it either comes back to the station or if it has another call to go to, he'll close that call. He makes notes on that call and then he goes to the next call. When he finishes that call, he has to put notes within 24-48 hours on our website. It goes through what's called our transparency portal. It will tell you why it was up, what type of call it was doing and it will show you the flight pattern it went and came back.

And that's for every call during the test mode and training mode If we put it up to test or to demo, it'll say demo for other police departments because we're the first in this county to have it. They've been wanting to come to look at it so if we don't have a call that's active, here let me show you something. We'll run it over to the hillside over here or over the church where something and then they can see what works bring it back and then they bring it back And the setup that we have-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:35:58

Real fast. Are we okay to keep, as far as the agendized item? I don't want to get like we're out of the agendization. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:36:07

think we're within the range. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:36:09

right, no worries,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:36:10

I just didn't wanna get

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:36:11

in trouble.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:36:12

You're doing fine, you're doing fine guys. Okay so and he logged that as a demo for whatever police department but they haven't come yet so we haven't had that scenario but in training they would log their training Thank you.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:36 – 4:4117 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:36:43

Privacy and transparency to study up on this technology specifically, it does give us a lot of ability to not overreact to certain circumstances or under react. And in worst cases say there's a fire up on the hill it also is going to help our fire department some ways. Is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:37:02

They actually have, they've come to visit and we demoed it for them. And they actually have the ability to log in and see it when their battalion chiefs goes through a fire which can help them with planning and bringing other fire engines or other units into their area so we do partner with them for that. And we have the ability to stay up for 23 hours and 45 minutes a day Because we have two of them, so when one battery's going bad or if I could find a second pilot, I could send the second one up at the same time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:37:39

Thank you for that. Again, I just wanted some clarity so people understood what this specific technology was. So thank you for that. I appreciate it. I'll make a motion to pass. I think it's item 10. Oh sorry, my bad.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:37:54

Mine is just a quick one. I think for transparency, it would be wise for us to talk about this as a first responder tool and not a surveillance vehicle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:38:08

Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:38:09

And make sure they're separated next week or two weeks from now when they come back to the flock discussions because those tend to get conflated and I think they're two completely different things

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:38:26

I think even when people see the way we implement FLOC, they'll be surprised. You're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:38:34

going to run into

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:38:35

a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:38:36

pretty emotional thing in the next two

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:38:38

weeks. I understand. I would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:38:40

try to de-conflate them is all I'm saying.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed4:38:43

I understand there's a million vendors for what these items do. They just pick that company.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:38:56

I already did public comment, so I'm not going to do that. Right? Nobody wants it anyways.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:39:02

Go ahead and make your motions. I'll make a motion to accept item 10. Motion

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:39:08

by Ball. Have we got a second anywhere? Seconded by Vega. Go ahead and vote. That's 5-0. Moving on. Oral communications, your last two minutes. Oral communications. Morals is right there. No morals out there, not in that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:39:36

zoo. Good evening. So I just wanted to emphasize my earlier request on asking the council to order an audit for Visit Lompoc and one of the things that I want to point out is the city per the contract can only go back five years for the audit. Visit Lompoc in 2023, that's when they initially said we're doing our own audit, we'll provide it to the city, we'll make it transparent. Well three years have passed so that's three years of data now we've lost. We can't audit that anymore.

Assuming the proverbial, they got their hand caught in a cookie jar. Well three years have already passed so now that stuff's all fallen off and you've only got basically from 2021 until now till they can look at I think just given the amount of money that flows through Visit Lompoc, I think last year they spent like $600,000 or $700,000. There's about a million dollars in their reserve account.

You know, just statements that seem inconsistent. You had Atul Patel when he made his call and said well we only have one account But then the grand jury did their investigation and they said, well you have a checking account. You have an investment account and now there's this third account so it deserves a look. I'm not saying they did anything like the numbers don't match but until you get in and look at the receipts you're never going to know. And the receipts that the council had asked them to provide They did so, but those numbers don't add up. It doesn't even come close. There's hundreds of thousands of dollars that appear to be missing.

When I asked them for receipts and public records they gave me an Excel document that they created. put whatever you want in that. So, you know, an audit would give transparency. Mr. Ball had made a comment almost like he had a crystal ball and said I don't want to be talking about this in a couple of years. You know, an audit would put this to bed. It, you know, it would answer the questions, it would give trust and, you know, I think at this point it's gone on...

4:41 – 4:4732 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:41:45

Anybody else? Anybody on teams and cell phones?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:41:52

There is no additional public comment via Teams or phone call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:41:57

Very good, we'll close Oral Communication Reactor Council Comments and Meeting Reports. Council Member Ball?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:42:06

No reports I just have one council request again this keeps coming up and I think it's getting Demonstrably worse and worse and worse. And that's the issues in our fire department, I would just like to request again let's just hash it out but let's get it as a public agenda item where we can talk about what their issues are because If we are really facing the situation where you may have to lean on the county to provide service, that will not be a cheaper option for us guaranteed. So I'd love for us to try to figure out how to make bold moves to stabilize this department and do right by them. So look for support for some sort of agenda item to address our fire department issues.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:42:48

So you're looking for a presentation I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:42:55

looking for an opportunity to have public discourse, council can talk about in public what we need to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:43:11

And I'm not against the public meeting, but are we going to accomplish in a public meeting what perhaps we really need to do? And I thought the last session we had on that, I kind of expected it to come back to closed session. with a resolution that we were going to act on.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:43:41

Well, Mayor Mosby, Council Member Ball and members of the council. We are going to be putting a closed session on the agenda and I believe we're going to do that on the October 6th meeting which will allow the council to take consideration if the council gives staff direction and we go back and meet with the local, we'll have to bring it back on resolution in a public meeting.

We won't be able to open up negotiations in public because it is labor negotiation, so that's why closed session is the appropriate venue for discussions behind the labor negotiations portion of it. I believe that will serve the Council and in a better way to get some sort of direction The IAFF, and my understanding is that the IAFF is responding to direction that the council gave staff at its last closed session.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:44:43

So if

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:44:45

I may let me update my request a little bit. I think that's completely fair again all the nuance and the details negotiation. If you want to put that in closed session that's just fine then I am requesting let's have a big picture conversation about the health of our department what's missing because we are at critical mass and what we may do in there may not solve the bigger picture issues of the sustainability of our fire department. So I'd love to have something in the public as well if that has to be watered down and not specific to how much who gets what, that's fine but let's talk about it in public. That would be my request.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:45:19

I'll second you on that. You got a third for fire department discussion? I don't know when it's going to come.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed4:45:26

If I give you a third, my issue would be that we had an extensive presentation awhile back from the fire department. I'm not sure exactly if you're looking for the same thing again or you're looking for something structural from us to move forward. I think we can do it a little bit better than that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:45:41

And I certainly respect that. I think what I'm learning is that there are staffing issues that are popping up more regularly than when we first heard the presentation only a few months ago, and those staffing challenges are going to lead to bigger picture issues that if we don't jump in and talk about it sooner than later...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed4:45:57

I just hope it's not a one-way conversation. You know, that's all I ask

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:46:01

for. If it's in public, I think we all get a chance to talk and hash it out.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:04

There you go. So you got that, Gabe? We rolled up something? All right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:46:10

Yes, and I see Chief Shea here also. Do we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:46:14

have a date on that? Is this after closed session or... I mean, I don't mind it but it'll go on the agenda list in six months from now you'll get your...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:46:25

My request would be as soon as possible. I'd rather us not be talking about it after the county is taking care of our fire services.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:46:32

Understood. We'll go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:32

ahead and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:46:33

put that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:34

down. Good? Where was I now? Council Member Vega, you had something? Nothing to report?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed4:46:45

Nothing to report, but I'm afraid you do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:48

Oh yeah, I'm ready.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed4:46:48

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:48

know, thanks. I go to these meetings. Councilor Bridge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:46:53

Yeah, I have been laboring under the impression that Explorer Lompoc had met all our questions and we had a session and I listed I don't know, five to six. I can find them again that was part of that motion and so if they haven't met what they promised to do could we find out what they missed? Because I thought they'd done what we asked as a minimum you know maybe next meeting we could get a report back on what was outstanding

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed4:47:30

Yeah, we can bring something back on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:33

that. I'll give it a second on that. A third? Starbucks got a third on that. It's something relating to what was said as well. If they did an audit, you got an audit of what they presented to us so we could make some action so you could present to us. Right? Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:47:51

Sure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:52

Alright. Anything else?

4:47 – 4:5121 turns

CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction4:47:59

Just a quick question. City Clerk, is the November 3rd meeting cancelled? No. I want to maybe bring up for consideration that has typically been a cancelled meeting.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:48:14

Not every year.

CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction4:48:15

Not every year but it was asked of me by somebody on staff who isn't here but somebody else has taken his place about that. Yeah, it's election night and we've only met here when we've had something very pressing. We've got three items in future agendas. I just was going to suggest you guys take everybody up here except for you and I are running. I'm sure you'd rather be somewhere else than here so if you wanted to go dark on November 3rd, I was just bringing it up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:48:44

Maybe just do a brownout?

CommentCouncil Member BridgeProposed · by introduction4:48:46

I don't mind meeting. I would support that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:48:49

I can bring forward the calendar so that you can vote on it. I can bring back the calendar. You can vote on it at the next meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:49:04

Are you done? I report that I represent City of Lompoc at LAFCO, and coming down the line at LAFCO they said there's a tune-up on the mutual aid that happened with the fire department or regional dispatch. It's supposed to be done annually as stated in LAFCO. I also attended the Utility Commission. A question, you still don't have a commissioner appointed? Ah, awesome, okay.

As we went to the Park Commission, well it wasn't totally fully in meeting but shout out to the people who are interested in doing some of those rec fields over there. They're gonna have that meeting next Monday. Can we add on that, we're getting a presentation on FLOC next meeting can we add that to be also an action item potentially for us? If I get two other people to go along with that, because it's just a presentation. My discussion was there'd be flock book possible action.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:50:07

It can be a direction from council, but I don't know what action you're referring to. Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:50:13

I don't know either. We might have something we need to do if I get two other people to go along with it. Sometimes we do a presentation six months later before I can take action. So Council Member Bridger would support it. Council Member Ball would support

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:50:27

It'll be direction from council after the presentation. That's the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:50:30

action I'm looking for, something like that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:50:31

because

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:50:32

sometimes we get

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:50:32

presentations... Sometimes we would need a resolution or something and you'd have time to put that together.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:50:38

Just want to make sure it's understood. Right? And the MOU, is that available between the LPD and the sheriffs? Is that...I know we all got a copy to it but is that available on the website somewhere? Your new MOU? It's a public document, but I don't know if it's on the website. Can you make sure it gets somewhere so people can access it so they see what's going on?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:51:08

Was it brought to us or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:51:10

given to us? It was emailed to us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:51:14

Somewhere... I'm sorry, Mayor Mosby. This is an MOU between the LPD and the Sheriff's Office?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:51:26

The new one that just came out about the riverbed and what's going on there, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:51:30

Understood.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:51:31

Okay. Thank you. Anything else? You good? We're tired. You're tired? Okay. We'll adjourn to regular meeting 630 p.m., October 6th.