UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:09 – 0:2319 turns
Okay. We'll be starting our meeting now. It's five o'clock, we will be starting our City Council closed session meeting at 5 p.m. on September 28th 2026. Good evening welcome to the council meeting. Roll call please
Right hand over your heart and repeat with me.
Thank you, Aaron.
Okay, we're gonna get started here. First of all please a little house cleaning if you would please silence your phones and we will be allowing people to talk uninterrupted and we're going to start off
we're limited
for public comment to 30 minutes and we have 10 And I don't know if there's anybody on Zoom, but so far we already have 10 speaker slips. So 30 divided by 10 is going to be three minutes a piece unless there's... So anyway that's how we're going to proceed. So we are gonna go then public communications on closed session and this is only for items 2A B or C.
We'll start off with Candace Libera And next would be Jennifer Cabello.
Good evening mayor, council members and staff and audience. Today marks day 14 of the strike by City of Solvang union represented employees. Fourteen days we have stood on that line truthfully none of us wanted to be there to begin with We want to be back at work serving the community we care about with a fair contract in place. There is no doubt this has been stressful and difficult for everyone involved, but this no longer only is about a contract it's something much harder to repair that is being lost in the process and that is trust.
Every additional day we remain on that line makes rebuilding that trust more difficult We continue to feel undervalued, unheard and disrespected because we care deeply about the work we do. We are not simply names on a payroll or numbers in a budget and yes I do understand those things are important for a city to be fiscally responsible as we've heard We are your employees, your staff and members of this community. Many of us have dedicated years of our lives to serving the city because we genuinely care about solving. We understand that negotiations require compromise. We're just asking to feel that our work does matter too as does admin and the city managers.
That our voices matter. That the people who keep this city running are worth fighting for. This strike will eventually end, and when it does we will walk back through the doors and we will have to work side by side again. We will have to rebuild relationships, rebuild morale, rebuild period. But rebuilding cannot begin if we continue to move further apart. We should be working together for solving and not against one another. Thank you.
Good evening Mayor Brown, City Council members and staff. I'm here tonight because i want you to think about what you're actually paying for when you pay a city employee. We are the people working on the streets maintaining infrastructure responding to problems and emergencies serving residents and helping keep this community running every day Just because some of us didn't go to college doesn't mean we don't have specialized skills, training, knowledge and years of experience.
These skills take time to develop and are essential to this city. We've heard that management needs raises to retain employees. I understand that the importance of retention, but I ask you do you want to retain your skilled line staff too? Because when you lose experienced employees, you lose institutional knowledge specialized skills and people who understand this community and how the city operates.
Is Solvang supposed to be an entry-level city where employees gain experience and then have to leave to find a wage that reflects their skills? Many of us grew up here, live nearby or have been here long enough to consider Solvang home. We care deeply about this community. We take pride in what we do. We don't want Solvang to be a stepping stone. We want to build our careers here. We want to raise our families here as we have been raised here.
But we also deserve compensation that reflects our skills, experience, responsibility and dedication. We should not have to rely on overtime to earn a good wage. Overtime is not guaranteed compensation when employees work nights weekends and holidays or respond to emergencies they do it because their neighbors and this community need them. So please look beyond the paycheck number, look at the experience, the training, responsibility, dedication behind the job. We are not asking to be treated as expendable. We are asking to be valued. Solvang deserves skilled experienced employees who want to stay and those employees deserve a fair wage. Thank you.
Thank You Erin Peterson's next followed by Hank Hamburg
Hi, my name is Aaron Peterson. I'm here not taking sides on this at all. I just own some businesses in town, some real estate in town. Grew up here, my kids have gone here. I've got kids in the military serving in Iran and San Diego and all over the place. I know a lot of those folks. I obviously know a lot of you folks here. I think everyone in the room obviously has Solvang at its best heart.
Come on, that's why we live here. It's a matter of just trying to sit in a room, compromise and get it. I'm just urging you from a business position standpoint that we get this done. It's not hurting business yet but it gives us a black eye. It makes us just feel a little bit less united and I don't even pretend to understand the details of 3% to 8% to 2%. It's above my pay grade. All I'm saying is that if we could all sit in a room, get it compromised, get it done, move on. I think I'm speaking of the choir everyone probably wants this done to so there's no knowledge. I'm just trying to speak from the business standpoint that it does affect us day-to-day and as we get into the fall season.
Good luck. I am glad it's all you folks and not me.
Thank you, Erin. Hank Hamburg followed by Denise El Amin. Good
evening council members mayor city manager and all the employees in the audience it's really disturbing to me that we're sitting here like this with white shirts and Teamster stuff on that should only be on at barbecues. My view is, and my understanding is that mayor council and city manager type of government is run by the mayor and the council members. takes his direction from you, particularly the mayor but also the council members. You guys represent people of the city, the constituents.
This is on unfortunately on the council members I know it's like a big poker game or whatever between the city, the city attorney, city manager, the Teamsters. But you guys have to have communication and trust and that starts with you guys reaching out to your city employees whether you guys have coffee with all your city employees. I don't think that's a realistic thing but maybe a couple of city employee groups come and have coffee with you guys once a month and discuss stuff. That way we don't have this kind Friction when it comes down to salaries, and I think that onus is on you guys But it's also one on the teamsters and the workers here too. You guys have to have open communication I don't think they're asking for a lot The way the economy isn't such I don'y think it's a lot at all You guys were responsible for giving the city administration staff a huge raise.
I mean incredible raise I've never heard of anybody getting upwards of 40% raises And you guys approve that The city workers deserve 666 in my opinion, but that's not for me to decide. Like Aaron said it's over my pay scale, but you need to sit down and have open communications and discussion and get this thing resolved ASAP. This is ridiculous okay? And I hope I only see Teamster shirts at their Teamster barbecues from now on because i don't want to hear the honking. I don't want to see them out there with their Their families on a picket line, it's crazy. So please do your due diligence as mayor and council members and give direction to the city manager like you're supposed to not the other way around and the city attorney and get this thing done.
Thank you.
Thank you. Denise Allen-Meen and you'll be followed by Jonathan Flynn
Hi, I'm Denise Ellamine. I worked for AT&T for 30 years. I was a union representative and I negotiated contracts for those 30 years. And yes, I was very good at it. It appears that no one on the City Council has any background in negotiating contracts with employees. Because if you did, they wouldn't be on strike. 4% and 6%, I've never heard of that being rejected. Especially after you throw in their face a 40% raise to 1 person It doesn't make sense. So if you realize that you don't have the capacity to negotiate a union contract, then there is an option for people like that and you should've taken the moderator.
But for some reason, you guys don't know how to negotiate and you didn't want to take the moderator either. Now that's where I'm confused. If you don't know something, you're supposed to ask. And this strike has been going on too long. It needs these great workers. I know most of them and I love all of them. They need to come back and work. And you guys need to make that happen.
They are more important than one employee being paid 40% more on his pay raise and having more assistants now working for him. The employees that are behind me, the Teamsters Union deserves a lot better than what you guys have given them. And I'm hoping that soon, November the 3rd, that you will have somebody on this city council that will be able to acknowledge and help you guys with union contracts. Because we've never been here before in this city and this city is so small it's really sad and pitiful to see the things that are being written up about Solvang We're a Danish happy place, sort of like Disneyland I guess. But if you neglect your employees and you treat people bad, the happiness is gone. So please come together with love, Danish, and get these employees back to work as soon as possible.
Thank you. Jonathan Flynn, followed by
Melanie
Bates.
A city is only as strong as the people who maintain its water systems, handle administrative business and keep its streets safe and clean. Our municipal workers bargain in good faith for over five months before being forced into a work stoppage. The city has referenced comp and class study again and again as reason for this huge disparity in pay. What's been clear to me through this is that simply because something is normal for the time does not make it right.
The city claims it wants a fair agreement that returns everyone to work, yet it has failed to initiate a single bargaining session since imposing its initial offer. The community wants this dispute resolved. We ask you tonight to retract the imposed terms of Resolution 26-1334, initiate immediate bargaining with Teamsters Local 986 and agree to the contract that respected our dedicated workforce. Thank you guys.
Marianne Bates followed by Adrienne Reyes.
0:23 – 0:329 turns
Good evening, my name is Marianne Bates I am a fifth generation Solvang resident and an active member of this community. I wanted to speak briefly in support of our city employees and the importance of the roles they serve in this community. I think sometimes it's easy for all of us to forget how many people it takes behind-the-scenes to keep this place going every single day These are people who work with us from the beginning of building our homes and businesses to the ongoing and continued maintenance to keep them running.
They maintain our streets, they care for our public spaces, they assist residents, they keep projects moving, and they handle countless other responsibilities that we all greatly depend on every day. Within this community I interact with staff from multiple city departments on a weekly or daily basis. I see firsthand the knowledge that these experienced people commit to their roles.
These employees are also members of this community, they live here, they raise their families here, they shop here and they've dedicated so many years of their lives to this city If we want to retain good experienced people, we have to make sure they feel valued. And part of that means recognizing them and their responsibilities, providing a fair wage and a competitive one.
There's a tremendous value in the institutional knowledge of these people. What happens when they've spent years learning the ins and outs of everything in this city? And they're just dismissed and are no longer here. Those years of experience and those relationships within this community are gone. You can't just hire someone new. I hope the city and its employees can find a path together that allows everyone here to feel heard, valued and maintain the quality of service that this community depends on.
Supporting our employees is supporting our community and retaining experienced staff is essential to that. I respectfully ask all of you to please listen to these people, recognize their value and give serious consideration to what they have raised.
Thank you. Adriana Ries is next, followed by Brian Baca.
Hello, my name is Adriana Reyes and I'm a founding board member with both SYB Pride and Centro Corazon Comunitario, two non-profit organizations serving the San Ines Valley. As you are aware we have proudly hosted both Pride and Hispanic Heritage Month celebrations in the City of Solvang. Both events operate through the City of Solvang special events process which requires us to work closely with various city's departments particularly the parks and recs and maintenance teams.
Throughout my more than five years of working with these two non-profit organizations, I have consistently found city staff to be extremely helpful, supportive, professional and inclusive of the missions of both organizations. Planning and producing these events requires numerous meetings Emails, conversations, permits and coordination regarding street closures and other logistical matters.
At every step the staff we have worked with have been demonstrated professionalism and a genuine commitment to helping our community events succeed. This year both events welcomed a significant number of visitors from outside of the San Andres Valley who came to Solvang to participate in enjoy these celebrations. These events may not only provide meaningful cultural and community experiences, but they also contribute to the local economy by bringing visitors into Solvang who patronize local businesses.
In the case of Pride, visitors also utilize local lodging generating additional revenue for the community and the city I would like to emphasize the importance of a maintaining professional, empathetic and inclusive city staff. Not only for the successful operation of these community events but also for the many visitors who come to Solvang throughout the year.
With that in mind, I respectfully ask that you reach...that you continue working with the team leaders and representatives involved to reach a mutual agreeable resolution I sincerely hope that meaningful negotiations can take place and that an agreement can be reached that allows the current strike to come to an end. Our community events depend on the collaboration and dedication of city employees, and we deeply value the relationship we have built with them over the years. I hope the City will continue to recognize the important role these employees play in supporting Solvang residents, organizations, businesses, visitors, and non-privates. Thank you so much.
Brian Baca is next.
Good evening, I'm Brian Baca and 21 years ago I had the opportunity and the privilege to sit in that chair right there for three years and then thankfully I was taken out of town to get out here I'm not going to second guess your judgment as to how much of a raise the management should get. Obviously, by the raises you granted, you'd like to keep your employees and your team.
Well, the line staff, represented staff behind me, that's part of your team. And I've lived in Solvang since 1990, and I guess I've lived long enough to see a strike here in Solvang which seems totally out of character. I wondered who these nuts were in the park waving signs because that kind of thing doesn't happen in Solvang. And so I would suggest you put as much effort in retaining your current staff as you did for retaining your management team.
And so I'm just a citizen now and have been for 25 years And the citizens are watching because you can't hardly avoid it. So with that said, good luck in my chair and good luck to the rest of the council.
Thank you. Thank you we've exhausted this lips is there anybody in the room that has a comment to make? Yes ma'am. We'll allow for two more. Is your name in?
Of course. Thank you. My name is Mary Netto, I'm a resident of Solvang. I'm here to support our city employees who have been picketing for over 10 days now. These employees are part of our community. They do the day-to-day that keeps Solvang running maintaining our streets parks water systems offices and other city services Many are also raising families while trying to keep up with a high cost of housing, groceries, gas and other everyday expenses.
Now I understand that the city has a budget to manage but fairness matters too. When upper management receives the lion's share Of the salary increases, the employees doing much of the everyday work deserve meaningful consideration as well. They are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for wages that reflect the work they do and the cost of living in this community.
Fair wages also help the city keep experienced employees and maintain reliable services. Now I'm asking the council to reconsider its position and provide a fair wage increase for these employees. And I was a former employee too in the past, so their value should be reflected in how they are compensated. So thank you.
Thank you and thank you for your
service. Is there a person on Zoom that wishes to speak? No? Okay, then we will now close it to public communications. Madam Clerk would you read our items of discussion in the record please?
0:32 – 0:332 turns
Recess to closed session. Item 2a, Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representative Dave Fleischman Assistant City Attorney Employee Organization Teamsters Union Local 986. Item 2b, Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.91 Name of Case Edward St. George v. City of Solvang et al. Case Number 25CB07234 Item 2C, Conference with Legal Counsel Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9d2 1 Potential Case
Thank you very much and thank you very much for being here this evening we are now adjourned to closed session
1:26 – 1:316 turns
Let's
go in here. No. Yeah, I'm just trying to get the video to work as well. It all is fine
here you did your job we're good
Yeah, cheers. Got it.
Hold on, it was out of presentation. Thank you brother. Okay.
The finalizing the um, that there is going to be a mask. Although each individual private school on it's own also have to go through the same process so it's not like all of a sudden trans Christian Anderson schools are getting close to that. They can't get the money yet. . . . I hope it's a hard thing, but we will let it go. You want to change that 0.50, which is great so they can even hear it. Because this is the latest and last time I walked over here was two weekends ago. There's still one more thing, and there's not 15 people waiting in line. And if they do need this, they need to make sure they aren't bothering them at all.
. . . Okay. Okay. Okay. This is my back pocket. Thank you.
1:36 – 1:415 turns
Yeah.
Thank you. We are back from closed session. Madam Councilor, is there any reportable action please?
Thank you, Mayor. The City Council met in closed session on a conference with labor negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. There is reportable action on this item. The reportable action is that the city's negotiator spoke with the union negotiator on Friday and during that conversation the city's negotiator offered to meet with the union this week and provided dates for such meeting For that meeting, the City Council this evening directed the city negotiating team to hold those dates open for a meeting with the union pending a request from the union to meet on those dates.
On the other items, on item 2B and C which were conference with legal counsel existing litigation pursuant to government code section 54956.9D1 and conference with legal counsel anticipated litigation significant exposure to litigation pursuant to government code section 54956.9 D2 there is no reportable actions on items 2 B or C. Thank you mayor
Thank you. Then we are now closed for closed session at 528, excuse me 628. I need a digital watch so we will begin again in about three minutes time if anybody needs a bathroom break or personal break Welcome to the Solvang September 28, 2026 City Council meeting. I'm Dave Brown your Mayor and we will begin with the roll call please.
Roll call, called by Will Henry
Show transcript
Here and I'm sorry for the record we've started at 632 this evening. I would like Candace Libera has been kind enough to lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
1:42 – 1:496 turns
Thank you, well done. Okay.
We have no proclamations for tonight, but we do have a presentation from Visit San Yanez Valley. I want
to introduce Shelby Simm. He's going to give us a presentation recapping last year. I shared with him when I spoke to him at their event a couple weeks ago that I get goosebumps when I see her and listen to him talk about all the fun things that are going on in our community so I'm looking forward to this one.
Thank you, Randy. Mr. Mayor, City Council, always a pleasure to be out in front of you and great opportunity with you this evening to tell you about 2025 with Visit the Santa Ynez Valley. I'll run through some things very quickly and then spend a little more time on other things but staff-wise, you've got myself, President and CEO Daniela Loudon-Ruiz right here on the side, Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. Both Daniela and I have been with the organization over 12 years now.
And then Brenda Ball, also a well-known name in this town is our website and membership administrator. Our board is made up of Linda Johansson who represents Builton on the Board, P. Soup Anderson's but also King Frederick Inn. We have Greer Arehu, did I do that right? She represents Fess Parker and all of their enterprises. We have Camden Wyrick he represents the Vinland The Winston, and as well as some hotels in Buelton. And then we have Stormy Strickland, she represents Cork as well as Hadston. And then we have Gretchen who represents Buelton's Marriott, SYB Marriott, and Kathleen Cochran of the Alisal Ranch. Josh just stepped down he was with the Ballard Inn our newest board member is...
Thank you, Clayton with Maddy's Tavern, the GM there. And then we have Jeff Hartman who owns the Zipline Hightline Adventures and then Will Henry who owns Lumen Wines as well as Pico Restaurant. That's our board of directors. So brief history, we are a destination marketing organization. We were formed in 2010 by the hotels funded by The Visitor. We don't receive any government funding whatsoever. Very proud of that. Currently, the visitors pay $3 a night when staying overnight in any of the hotel rooms.
Hotel and Visitors Association merged in 2013 and we became Visit the Santines Valley. DMO, think of it as a spot that markets a specific place, a town or region. We market a region. We do see the towns of Santines, Solvang, Muleton, Ballard, Los Olivos, and Los Alamos as one region so we market all those areas for hotel night stays, and of course the hoteliers know that you're not coming for the hotel. You're coming for the experiences. You're coming from this amazing Danish capital of the world for food, for wine, for activities.
Our mission, of course, is to promote the Sandines Valley region as a diverse destination for everyone to experience which creates prosperous and sustainable outcomes in overnight stays for the towns I just mentioned. How do we achieve our mission? Through partnerships, robust marketing campaigns, grant program and sponsorships, travel trade, PR and media relations as well as event programming.
These are some of our highfalutin partners. We have many others but very proud of our partners. And so let's get into 2025. Financial stuff, you've seen it. It's in the report just to let you know we did spend more than we brought in last year and that was on purpose to take down our savings a little bit and we also invested $100,000 in a brand new website.
We do want to have a little more money in the bank and we're working towards that so our budget is much tighter this year and will be tight again next year but everything is looking fantastic. 2025, we held two networking receptions. Our annual meeting as well as our guide launch both of them very well attended and then overall strategy continue to build awareness and positive perception of the region among highly qualified potential visitors drive visitation through our shoulder seasons and then grow use of attribution based advertising Our target markets for paid digital, you'll see a lot of drive markets but then also direct flight markets is where we spend a lot of time.
And Phoenix, Las Vegas, Denver, Seattle, Portland and we just added Chicago as a direct flight out of Santa Barbara and then we're promoting wine and food travel, romantic getaway outdoors activities and LGBTQ+. Our 2025 markets again, you know a lot of dry markets are flight markets and then who's coming and we take advantage of who's coming. So we're attacking Canada, we're attacking Mexico, Scandinavia, Europe as well as the East Coast.
And then our campaign in 2020-2025 was perfectly Santines Valley And incredible traction, doing great. Stats are in the report but everything looks fantastic. We also do restaurant weeks, San Diego Valley Restaurant Weeks and our participation continues to grow. This year we had over 31 restaurants and 32 tasting rooms participate After COVID, we kind of had to change our routine so that restaurants could afford to do it. So now you can offer a 30, 40 or 50 priced three item menu and many restaurants do all three but incredible and it's become a real community thing as well. It gives the community a chance to go out and try restaurants they may not be able to otherwise.
During our slowest season, our January February March we do the midweek membership club and so if you come and stay in the Santinas Valley Sunday through Thursday for two nights we'll give you a $100 bill. Not a credit card not a gift card anything a literal hundred dollar bill And it's an incredibly successful campaign. This last year in 25, we had 76 redemptions and it accounted for over $43,000 in room sales.
Digital performance. So amazing, all good. Here's a few examples of our videos.
From furry friends to long weekends This is perfectly Santa Ynez Valley. Plan your trip at VisitSYV.com From sunny days to overnight stays, this is perfectly Santa Ynez Valley. Plan your trip at VisitSyv.com From sunny days...
Let's show that one again it was so good
1:49 – 1:582 turns
From early blooms to tasting rooms, this is perfectly Santa Ynez Valley.
All right so then we go on our campaign creatives, our audience targeting are of course folks who have been here before and then the folks who go to similar spots and so you see on both lists the different things that we focus on And again, folks who have been here before and then who are folks that come to places like ours that would be a great fit for the Santinas Valley.
Key performance indicators, there's that bunch of numbers but here is the awesome results Based on this particular campaign, we had 11,600 trips and the impact was almost $25 million. Print and distribution, so we do very little print and distribution but we do our destination guide as you know. We do 70,000 destination guides and California's Visitors Guide and California Road Trips Guide and then the Central Coast Visitors Guide. And we also have a great partner in Sunset Magazine and so we do ads with them as well.
Social media, we grew a little bit last year in 25. And then our new website that we're very proud of. It's beautiful if you haven't been there www.visitsyv.com. It is mobile first and we made it easy. That looks kind of confusing. We made it so it's very easy to see, very easy to scroll through, get what you want. We have an incredible events calendar Anybody watching or listening out there, go to visitsyv.com and add your event we'd love to have you.
We've created a custom map so it's easier for people to see and navigate around the Santinas Valley. And then of course a clear path to purchase our bread-and-butter is heads in beds and so on every page you have an opportunity to book a stay And we shifted from inspiration to information. So as we know with the growth of AI, AI is answering a lot of questions people don't have to go to your website so it's our job for our website to have the answers for AI to come and find.
And the results have been amazing on the new website very proud of that And then media relations, 2025 outreach and hosting. Danielle and I went to New York in January and we met with Worldwide Press and we also hosted a wine reception. It was at that meeting when we met with People Magazine and they had told us that you know we're more of a lifestyle kind of thing as opposed to a destination and as we were leaving we said well you know the former president is vacationing in the Santinas Valley right now And by 2 p.m., it was up on People Magazine in the afternoon, so instant value and then of course the whole world picked it up. The proudest thing on our end was that they said the Santinas Valley not Santa Barbara. So we're a destination unto ourselves, the Santinas Valley, very proud of that.
And then we also expanded into international. So for the last few years, we've gone to London for Brand USA's Travel Week And we meet with many, many countries and we've had incredible traction with press with that. And then this is some of the publications that picked us up in the last year. Very proud of that. We got a lot of Sunset Awards in 25. And they're still our partner with Taste of the Santinas Valley again, incredible few examples of the cool coverage And then as you know, in 24 sideways there are 20 the 25th anniversary of Sideways just was off the hook. People extended that into March of last year and did a great story part example of international press And then Taste of the Santina's Valley, which just happens to begin this coming Thursday.
It is going to be Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. This will be our sixth year. I'm very proud of what we've accomplished and that it keeps going. That's a map of all the folks that come to the Santina's Valley. So proud for Taste. It's great! It's from the East Coast, it's from the North, it's from the South. been able to accomplish with this and then here it is last year's video The City Council meeting is being recorded.
Heck of a year it was, but you ain't seen nothing yet. All right so we also do grants and sponsorships as you're well aware. We sponsor Danish days and anything else really that folks ask us and there might be an opportunity for heads in beds. Last year we gave out over $88,000 in grants and sponsorships. Travel trade. We're also going after groups. We've all felt for a long time that we should be the retreat capital of the world 30 or less should be our bread and butter, so we really go after group sales.
So we did a lot of that last year. We also go to US Travel's largest trade show, the United States' largest travel trade show. And last year we partnered with the city of Solvang as well as Buelton and that was in Chicago I believe. And then a real big thing for us, there is called the California Cup. And it's a revolving, moving golf tournament every year in California. It goes up and down the coast and it is a chance to sit in a golf cart with 11 different countries meeting planners, elite meeting planners as well as tour operators. And somehow I won the bid and we hosted them last summer here and it was incredible.
Video, great idea. Let's do it. Welcome to everyone to the 22nd annual California Cup Golf Invitational.
1:59 – 2:0628 turns
Hi, I'm Shelby Sitt with business at Santina's Valley. Welcome everybody! Welcome to the California Cup Round 1! Hi!
I'd like to introduce the Mayor of Buellton, David Sill.
I want to welcome you to Solvang and the Santa Ynez Valley. We're very honored to host the finale dinner at Sunstone. We're very proud of that place, we're very honored to host everybody. Thank
you so much for being here.
We're so, place we have here in the Santinas Valley. So we also go to industry conferences of course Visit California's annual outlook, Destinations International in Chicago and then we also go to One West Tourism Alliances a couple events they do every year one of them is the Leadership Summit which we hosted this year here in the Santinas Valley And that's it for 2025. 2026 is, again, an amazing year. We're beating last year in a lot of our numbers. We're doing fantastic. We had a really slow first quarter this year but we really made up for it and we're real excited to present next year as we go on. Thank you very much.
Thank you Shelby. Any questions?
Shelby thank you. Your website looks amazing. I have to confess that I still find things to do I didn't know about when I visit your site.
That's fantastic.
Exactly, so two couple questions the did I miss it or what was the stat? Do you have a 25 occupancy rate increase or what are you seeing in 26 yeah in terms of what we are seeing increases in hotel stays and therefore the revenue that were generating. Are you seeing similar things?
Absolutely. Yeah, like I said it was a very slow first of the year but the numbers we're pulling in now are fantastic. It's really hard to project next year as we all know ever since COVID the booking window is a lot shorter so it's hard to forecast how we're doing but we're doing fantastic.
And then how amazing comment on our relationship or your relationship with Sunset Magazine? How long have you been working on that relationship
Oh golly, Danielle you'll have to help me here. I'm going to say 23.
Wow
right after COVID.
Okay i thought you meant 23 years.
No we started TASTE in 19 and then through our agency we started cultivating a relationship with Sunset Magazine so that when we came back from COVID I think our first taste was in 2021 Sunset was very excited to be our partner.
Yeah, that's a big feather in your cap. Good, congratulations! Thank you.
Is Sunset Magazine kind of an industry benchmark?
Well it is, yes. It's like the Bible of California travel and Western influence absolutely. I would say AAA or Westways as well as Sunset Magazines are.
And have you seen any, what changes are you seeing in our demographic that's from three years ago? Where do you see that is there a trend of any kind that you can pick up or where are the changes?
Yeah. So credit to our amazing chief marketing officer over here that reminded me the other night of the K economy ready for this. So the high spenders, here's your, here's your line. The high spenders in this part of the K and then your value spenders. So we aren't getting a lot of the middle but we're getting value in big wallets so they call it the K economy Like a shape of a K.
Okay, that part I got. I'm not visioning the person except somebody's got deep pockets and another person with the lower part of the
value experience. Yeah so you've got the two folks that are getting out today to our destination are the ones looking for luxury experience and the ones looking for affordability.
And are we meeting those needs?
We meet those needs amazingly. Yeah, we're incredible as far as those offerings go. Yes.
As an advisor to enhancing our tourism I like the idea that you're doing discounts for the first quarter type of thing that you do and targeting those small groups 30 or so
We're always
re-evaluating, always talking amongst the board and creating committees to think about that stuff. The midweek membership club is probably going to stay in that first quarter unless we feel like
2:06 – 2:1322 turns
We're a fairly new destination as far as the world knowing about us. Santa Barbara's been at it a long time, San Luis Obispo, Pismo Beach all those folks have been around it a long time. So we're still the new kids on the block. So it's about us still going out there to shows, to those meeting planner shows, to the boutique meeting shows that kind of thing to let folks that they know they can come and stay here.
So it's just about outreach, outreach, outreach education.
Thank you.
Yeah.
Any other questions? Shelby thank you very much.
It's my honor and we love selling this place. There's so many destinations in California And how lucky are we that we get to promote this one. So thank you, and we appreciate your partnership very much. City of Solvang, thank you.
Can I say one more thing, Shelby? You guys do a great job. But I recently had an experience talking to somebody in Santa Barbara and referred to us as the Santa Barbara wine country. So I appreciate how much branding work you're doing to make sure we're known as Santa Ynez Wine Country.
Thank you. It's something else.
It bothered me more than I thought it would.
Yeah. I don't think we'll ever get away with not being Santa Barbara's wine country so we have to lean into it a little bit especially for SEO and that kind of thing but We're working our darndest to have our own identity, absolutely.
I had one other technical question and I don't know if you can do this or not but with our own marketing team for Solvang and Solvange USA and the likes is there any cross-pollination? Are you doing anything collectively with our team or
others? Absolutely yeah. You know Candace and Randy are great at coming to our meetings And so they're always abreast of what we're doing, and then they also let us know what you guys are doing. We work together when we can on more things than we ever have.
Perfect, okay. And is there any opportunity to make that better or what any recommendations that you have?
Well everything can get better all the time right so we're working towards that
absolutely. Anything specific that we can help initiate?
No we're working together with you know for our TASTE dinner here coming up on Saturday next and you know we'll talk about IPW again next year and And we make sure we have all your materials and make sure we're up on everything Solvang has to offer before we go to shows. And if there's ever an opportunity for Solvang to join us, you know, and travel with us, we love that as well.
Thank you.
Yeah.
Okay. Next on the agenda... Thank you again. Public communications. Would you read that into the record please?
At this time you may address the council on items not on the agenda and on consent. Time limit is three minutes and we will start with in-person public comments first.
Okay, on this item we have Denise Alameen
Hi, I'm Denise Ellamine and I spoke at the last meeting two weeks ago regarding a measure that's going to be on our ballot this year in November the 3rd. Measure D is with the Solvang School District, the high school district and they're asking for $80 million bond to their stating that it's going to address some of the old buildings that have been there for 87 years.
The truth of the matter is, they have a bond that they received in 2016 and they said the same thing, that they were going to redo the buildings and help the students Enrollment is down by 75 students at the Santa Ynez Valley High School, and they did not complete any of the work that they asked for with their last bond measure. So I am here today as a taxpaying person who already has three bond measures on my tax bill And if measure H for Hancock passes, that's a $240 million bond.
And the measure for Santa Ynez High School, that's 80 million dollar bond. If those two bonds pass in November then we will have five bonds measures on my tax bill. It's a lot, it's very expensive. It is very expensive to live in this valley and each bond that's added to our tax bills makes it more and more expensive. My problem is that there's no accountability the oversight committees always consist of Friends and families and people who rubber stamp things.
So if you're asking for any extra money, any bonds, any measures then you should come up with what you've done with the last bond and measure and let us have, let us see what you've done with our money and we shouldn't have to guess about it so again Solvang, the reason why I'm saying it as Solvang is because you guys have promised the school district $500,000 more. So not only is my tax bill going up, it's coming out of this pocket also.
Thank you. I don't have any other slips. Is there anybody on Zoom that wishes to present? Okay. Anybody in the room? City Manager's Report
2:13 – 2:2310 turns
I want to take a few minutes to talk, address a few of the comments that were made during the introduction to the closed session. There was an appeal to this council to pay a fair living wage to the workers and then as I pointed out last time at last week's meeting they do get a fair living wage. They had $75,000 a year on average not including the $38,000-a-year benefit package So I wanted to point that out. And this in no way diminishes the importance of each of those staff members, but they are receiving a fair wage and in comparison to what's going on with the management staff is you know apples and oranges we had problems filling vacancies and management staff the raises were nowhere near what is being represented in public City Manager George Trulli received an 8.5% increase, Administrative Services Director received just over 15%.
The single highest increase was 21%, for a person who was designated as a Planning Manager and the classification study determined that he should be a Community Development Director So not only was it an increase, but it was also a change of responsibilities. So those numbers again that have been cast about are not correct and not in context the increases to Recommended in these in the study for three individuals who were out of seriously out of alignment were included in your position as that the council approved last council meeting.
So it is fair and balanced, and it's unfortunate that they've chosen to go on strike. And where we started was 52% with the original ask. I put that out in the press release last Friday, and yes, we did get very close at the end. Last Monday they rejected our amended suggestion and essentially are striking over $30 a month at the end of this process. So it's unfortunate that that information not being communicated to the representative staff, they don't understand that.
Anyway I also want to take a moment talk about where we stand currently with negotiations as was pointed out coming out of closed session. The city negotiator remains ready to meet and we have been The city's work overall is continuing, water and wastewater running. Our front counters are open, our parks are open and residents and visitors are still being served.
Solvang downtown saw almost 41,000 out-of-market visitors during Danish days. I am grateful to the members of our team who are putting in the long hours to keep those essential services going for this community. I also want to speak about the workers. This has been difficult for our employees and their families. These are our colleagues and our neighbors. Every one of our representative employees is a member of this team in good standing, and that has not changed. The city holds no ill will And when they return, and they will, they will be welcomed back with respect as colleagues not as anyone who has to earn their place again.
Solvang's workforce is one community and we are eventually going to come through this hopefully sooner rather than later and I am determined to see that we come through it whole Lastly, on the advice of legal counsel the city will negotiate only through the appropriate channels which means at the bargaining table through the representatives each side has designated for that purpose.
That is the established process and it is the one the city will follow. We're going to keep our focus where it belongs on the people who work for this city and the community they serve Notwithstanding the last week's imposition of its last best final offer following the union's declaration of impasse in June, the Union retains a right under California law to meet and confer with a city.
All it takes is a phone call from them to request a meeting. Since they stepped away from the bargaining table our door is and has remained open I also wanted to point out that we are working on a webpage to keep this information current. It's not open up yet, but it should be here in the next few days. Upcoming meetings, we at the next council meeting will have a 60th anniversary proclamation for SB CAG.
We also will have our presentation from our fire department their quarterly report. The meeting after that will be a presentation from PG&E, the state of the utility by Eric Daniels and there are other presentations planned coming forward We will bring back an item to review the city camera, video camera policy that was requested. I'm not sure it'll be at the next meeting but it's gonna be coming soon.
We also have some interesting research done by Olivia, the assistant to the city manager about parking and the history of parking in the city. And I found it interesting that should be coming forward very soon. And that's all I have for now.
Thank you. Any questions of City Manager? Okay, keep plugging away. All right item 5 would you read that into the agenda please or into the record sorry.
Government Code Section 53232.3 D aka AB 1234 and government code section 84308 aka SB 1439 report out ex parte communications council comments requests
Thank you. Mr. LaFonte, we'll start with you.
Okay, over the last couple of weeks interestingly enough I attended the San Ynez Valley annual meeting. A few of us did and got that presentation that we just saw presented to us then. I also attended the Parks Direct meeting which unfortunately was very lightly attended but it was a follow-on to the previous one that had been done And there were some changes made. It was an interesting setup. I attended Danish Days and the Friends of the Library, and I want to go back to my comment about the Friends of the Library for a minute. They're spending $230 a month for a U-Haul trailer to store books in.
The idea of a shed we can talk about. One of the other ideas that came out is across the street, we have a building that's not being used, not the house but the building behind it. Is it possible to use that to store books in that they're going to sell? I'll leave that to the staff to tell me.
It's not on the agenda so we won't go into detail, but good anything else? No, thank you.
Yes I have something to report last week. I attended the annual 3CE meeting. 3CE is a community aggregate where us as part of the greater central coast as energy customers can opt in to collectively invest in renewable energy. Their goal is to be powering the Central Coast 100% by renewables on, by 2035. There's been significant progress done, but there are still long ways to go.
The renewables tend to depend on the weather and they also require a significant amount of Investment to catch up with nuclear, geothermal and other sources of power. That being said the hottest item that was discussed was on sunsetting fee that we paid to make up the value of the energy on the market And that's quite a lot considering On is on and off is off. And that was my understanding of energy, so yeah. And I do want to point out that we do share a seat with Bilton and Guadalupe. So every three years we're cycling but we all try to stay on top of it despite it being quite obscure to me. Well
thank you for your efforts on that. Anything else?
Yeah, the visitor center I noticed that it's open again and he looks wonderful. The Ebelskira Husset, not Ebelskira Husset, the Hooger Husset, yeah the cozy house. Yeah, I see it all the time people love to the personable attention by the Kladgar family so yeah thank you for that it looks great.
They do a great job. Anyone else?
2:23 – 2:308 turns
I'm probably going to forget a few things, but the major thing is that I did attend the League of California Cities conference down in Anaheim along with our city manager, the assistant city manager and our mayor. I think that's about it. Ms.
Rona?
Yeah I just had a couple of items. I did attend the VisitSYV annual meeting, also attended their annual review webcast so i've gotten a full dose of what that organization is up to over the last couple weeks and they consistently deliver and represent us very well so pleased with that. Also attended our last EMA, GSA water board meeting last week and can report out that we completed our or closed our window if you will of the first wave of well registration requirements for the basin which is a net new requirement. It is our first pass at asking folks to register their private property wells, and the team did an incredible job. They got almost 50%, just shy of 50% registration for their first effort.
So we're handing out kudos on that progress. And we will also be publishing by January the next formal recast of our And the last thing is I have been campaigning. And meeting with constituents and residents and hearing what's on their mind. It's always great to get out and touch the pulse of what's really going on in our community.
Thank you
I've got a few things here as always. Shout out for the Danish Days Foundation, it was great production again of Danish Days went by very smoothly i think in large part thank you to our city management team that picked up the slack during the strike and made it very seamless as best we could expect And especially, I'm going to even name Bridget and Jenny went above board on many things. To make that happen on the 16th. Oh, no, I forgot to say.
I was fortunate enough to walk in the candlelight parade for Danish Days and also offer opening remarks that Friday night. It was always a great time, and I want to thank Dean at the Information Center. He let me borrow his little costume, his vest. So shout out to Dean for helping me out there. So I look Danish, even though I'm of Irish descent. There you have it.
Okay and then on the 16th I was at a Zoom meeting for e-bike safety not just for our community but The biggest release there was for the highway 101 project that is wrapping up. The 17th was Visit San Ynez Valley, the annual meeting that they had and we just got that report this evening from Mr. Sims The Farm Bureau, I was on the 19th besides Danish Days, I was at a Farm Bureau dinner.
Annual dinner that they have out at Vega Vineyard. Great group of people that provide us farm to table don't forget the farm part okay so that's the new buzzword for them I think On the 21st, Sanchez Valley CWPP, that's County Wildfire Prevention. Anyway, acronyms I got to get through all of them but we discussed Wildfire protection in our community as well as funding for the studies that we need. And there was a question about some of that, but we found where the capital will come from and the commitments for that are now available.
On the 26th, I was fortunate enough to go to Nashville Nights. It's a great opportunity for the Friendship House. Great fundraiser for them and then yesterday, the 27th there was an artist advocacy foundation out in Woodstock. It was Woodstock in Woodstock type of thing That's all I have for my item five.
We'll move on to item six, consent. Would you read that into the record please? Madam Clerk?
Consent is for routine administrative city matters and is approved with one motion. Members of the public were afforded an opportunity to speak during the public communications portion of this agenda.
Thank you. Anybody have any concerns? All entertained either questions or a motion?
2:30 – 2:4517 turns
I'll make a motion to approve the consent items.
I'll second it.
It's been properly moved and seconded to approve consent item number six. Roll call, please.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 moved and seconded to approve consent item number six. Roll call,
Show transcript
Motion passes 5-0
Okay, we're leapfrogging to number eight because we have no number seven going on today for public hearing. So discussion items number A would you read that into the record
please? Development of policies and standards for construction site governance
Thank you, Mayor.
Good evening Council. So this evening we are bringing an item that was requested to us by the City Council to bring project site governance forward for Your consideration. So we're just giving you an update of our current regulations as well as a potential motion on directing city staff, uh, for to move forward. So the city currently has 12 active major projects. So major projects are considered those projects that are either new construction or substantially remodeled construction that is ongoing.
Site governance is considered rules and standards for construction sites. So, typically we are currently doing that on a site-by-site basis. Currently our municipal code has two sections that deal with this. We have a nuisance section as well as a noise section. So our nuisance section is Section 532 and our noise section particularly when it comes to construction hours is the Section 11118 So our nuisance code does address property maintenance and identify certain conditions that may constitute a nuisance.
Under those provisions, an unfinished building or structure that has remained under construction for 18 months or more may be considered in an unreasonable state of partial construction when its appearance or condition substantially detracts from surrounding properties or reduces surrounding property values. So again, we do have that and however an unfinished structure that's remained under construction for 18 months more is not automatically considered a nuisance solely because of its duration So again, we do have some regulations in our current code. The second portion is our noise ordinance which simply addresses construction noise and so our zoning regulation does include that construction activity to occur between the hours of 7 30 through 5 30 on weekdays and prohibits constructions on Saturdays or Sundays and state holidays state or national holidays unless a written authorization is completed by the community development director or their designee or an emergency exists.
So the reason for the limited hours, there is actually a caveat to that which is there's actually additional hours that may be completed by an individual property owner or tenants performing the work themselves and so again these regulations primarily address the effects of construction activity on neighboring properties rather than the overall appearance or length of the construction site that may be ongoing Further, an unintended consequence to the limited site construction is that it actually extends out the amount of time a construction project can occur. And then additionally it is compounded by it's exceptionally rare these days that new residential construction or substantially rehabilitated residential constructions are actually done by an owner-builder.
Majority of the time it is actually done by contractors and so again this our Our construction ordinance is actually one of the most restrictive here on the Central Coast, with the 7.30 start time as most actually allow for construction to occur on the weekdays at least between 7 a.m and 7 p.m and then some jurisdictions allow for Saturday construction with about the same time or modify the Saturday hours and then Sundays hit-and-miss some jurisdictions allow for it others don't So again, these are what we currently have in the books and collectively they're provisions that are provided with enforcement mechanisms once construction conditions become sufficiently detrimental. But there's no one pure section that we can relate to in regards to potential site governance.
So the Council may consider additional regulations. The first one being, as we went through codes from other various jurisdictions throughout the state, ones establishing its appearance requiring that for all building permits involving substantial exterior construction That they have fencing and screening. They organize material in storage area, organized areas that are put dumpsters and appropriately located portable toilets etc. And so again that would become a citywide standard if directed by the council The second one is establishing construction time limits, and so this is something that we looked into because again the 18 months isn't necessarily a catch-all.
Some projects will linger 1 to 2 years just depending on the brevity of the construction and if they're being phased in a certain manner. So looking at other municipalities such as the town of Atherton, city of Mill Valley they've established sort of construction time limits based on square footage or project valuation so again the bigger the project the more additional time that is given to complete the project and then these jurisdictions provide under certain circumstances ability to extend that out And again, for consistency we want to definitely be consistent with the California Building Code and just over the last three to four years as a part of the state's ongoing housing mandates they've really extended out the time period for construction.
So case in point, a construction permit used to only be valid for six months after issuance that's now been extended to a year. For residential projects you just need one inspection to extend it out another year so these projects can drag over time And these are already codified in state code, so we want to be very wary of how any sort of construction time limit gets set up in regards to the California Building Code.
And finally, amending construction hours. So potentially amending our code section 11118 to better match our industry standards. Understanding that while noise is one thing, prolonging projects is another. We have had a project in our community, a couple of them where they're requesting work to begin at 7 o'clock in the morning simply because that is like most jurisdictions. California at seven o'clock is the start time particularly when you're pumping out concrete or particularly on hot weather days. You want to get that early start to get going and then end during the middle of the afternoon And again, the Saturday construction. It's an odd duck that we don't allow for any type of Saturday construction and then Sunday is one of those where again it varies just greatly upon how you want to sort of have two different types of movements going do you want to allow a construction project to spittedly be done as quickly as possible or and allow for Sunday construction?
How do you define construction? Am I painting the outside of the house, is that construction? So most jurisdictions actually differentiate the two. Most actually have a noise ordinance that includes maintenance, we don't have that. So a basic maintenance painting would fall under basic maintenance. And again, that would be a part of this effort along with another green-lit effort to revamp our noise ordinance that was gonna be one of them is to subset out actual maintenance as a noise bearing thing because again there's nothing in our code that actually prohibits a leaf blower from running at 630 in the morning because we don't have a basic property maintenance noise ordinance. That's another one I was gonna ask about
So basically it's based on noise and I would assume that that's based on a complaint is where the penalties would come in.
Correct, so currently we've received complaints particularly in projects in residential neighborhoods where construction again starts at 7 30. We make it very clear it starts at 730. We've issued out fines for doing work on a holiday um so that's another thing we've done But again, what is actual construction? Is it mobilizing? Is it folks showing up to the site to get there to begin slinging hammers at 730? It's not well written in our code. So in this instance we've determined that the actual activity of construction starts at 7 30, but mobilizing and getting workers there. They can do that earlier than that because obviously they got to show up to begin at seven thirty because we've already given we've already hindered the ability to start at seven o'clock in the morning.
Fair enough well that was The part of it is more of a house that needs this up for sale. It needs some construction inside potentially, so there's not going to be any noise. So if nobody complains, is it violating something if they start at 7 in the morning?
Technically, yes. If they start construction at 7 o'clock in the morning they are violating and if you've never done an interior remodel those things are noisy as sin. I should know my neighbor told me to stop pounding my drywall as I was demoing out at 9 o'clock at night but that's because I put in a full day of work and I didn't want to pay a construction crew to do it at nine and my neighbor was conscientious and said if you want to do it Saturday I'll help you cool I would love that.
But anyways, yes it is quite noisy so well yes if no one complains about it how are we going to know about it but again understanding that we provide as a part of our permits now we provide the hours of construction on the permit just so everyone is on the same level playing field to understand what time construction could start. Thank you very
much.
Anyone else?
Can we We have something that differentiates in zones, but do we have the liberty to differentiate some of our policies and ordinances in the VMU? Our primary commercial zone when it's not meeting the two-thirds housing criteria. Can we set a set of standards that are different for VMU than non-VMU?
Yes, we actually can and we already do. So again one of the caveats of our existing noise ordinance construction ones at Wise at least is that there's supposed to be no construction in the VMU on weekends however if you're an owner builder you most certainly can And again, it goes back to we don't really have and I get the premise of why it was done like that in the county code. And I get the premise of why it was kind of done like that in 2004 but I don't today because it's very rare for an owner builder and an owner of a building to understand the California Building Code. and understand what needs to get done for walls and other major construction. It's pretty rare for people to understand that there are a few exceptions, so most certainly to answer your question yes we may differentiate between projects in the Village Mixed-Use District between other projects so that most definitely is on the table and can be on the table.
So many of you three examples I think we need to address or at least find In this exercise, which is great that we're doing it, find the right structures and frameworks to give us more management authority if you will. So a couple examples that come to mind I know the backstory on these things but I'm just going to give them to you. The water wheel building that burned down looked dangerous and very unsightly in the VMU for an extended period of time. I don't know if it was 18 months or not, you guys will have to correct the record.
Could we have done something to make that look more fit and finish? Second example, the building straight across from Theater Fest also in the VMU that had green fence around it for a very long time so long the building started to look beyond the green fence pretty dilapidated and the weed It was not fit and finish for an extended period of time. Projects that are on their way to being declared construction, they still look like they're being tended to.
Third issue which is a different example Founder Square obviously has a Certificate of Occupancy but is still under construction in parts of the building. How are we doing that? How are we giving them a Certificate of Occupancy when there's still construction ongoing in the building and if that's the case, and we say our snap line is 18 months Thank you.
2:45 – 2:5210 turns
So we'll tackle each individual case one by one. So let's start with the Waterwheel Building. Unfortunately, it was a fire. We had worked feverishly with the property owner to get demo permits issued out. The property owner was working with his insurance company for quite some time. Could this have been helpful? Yes, we still had nuisance codes that were in the book so it could have been helpful but again we were working very seriously with the property owner to demo as soon as they can once we got in and were able to basically come out and say there's no way they're going to be able to salvage this thing As far as 422nd Street or 422, the one next to the annex.
That one again was more a vacant property it's not so it had nothing to do all they were actively seeking construction permits at the time and changed their mind a couple times here and there They had been working on a permit, but it wasn't necessarily anything to do with construction. It was more of vacant property. So if you want to pump your vacant property that's a different story, different code section. We do have a code section for vacant property.
It's been in the books and don't quote me on this I want to say circa around 2006-7-8 which makes a lot of sense simply given the Great Recession and that's what caused a lot of municipalities like ourselves to look at our vacant property codes and see what we can do to ensure that vacant residential commercial projects weren't looking abandoned. Is it time to potentially or is it that? Yes, it may be as far as Founders Square that is you know the facades in issue certificate of occupancy the certificates of occupancy is there for the interior all the other spaces What they're doing is exterior work, it's not a health safety issue and again with absence of a code we can't require them to do green fencing. We can't require them to close certain things off if it's a health safety issue at this point that's not.
It's more of an unsightly issue on the eye of the beholder And while I wish that the project would finish faster, it is really ultimately up to the property owner and the contractor to go ahead and move with that. And again, the California Building Code is very specific on how we can extend out permits based on inspections. So they have been getting inspections for certain aspects of it. Those have passed, and it's now up to the property owner to finish that off. And the property owner needs to focus that energy to finishing it off.
I thought you were going to tell us that we would issue different COOs for first level versus second level, because I think that's not ready to be occupied. Correct?
There
is
nothing on the second level at all. We have no entitlements, no building permits in regards to the second level. It's all exterior work.
Okay, okay. So here's what I'm kind of thinking about giving with regard to direction. I'm going to give you like big chunky things that I think we need to pay attention to. The first is something that looks like a performance bond for developers?
If I may, if we're getting into direction I think we should make sure we take public comment. Yep, you're right. Definitely excited to hear your thoughts.
Any other questions? How, when you come back with any feedback if we give you that direction is it you redline what we have and how that's going to be changed so we can kind of
see apples-to-apples? Yes. It most certainly would be redlined out to review the best course of action would actually do not place this under the zoning ordinance it'd be placed under the building code or the chapter 8 simply because then it just We will now open it up to public comment.
Hi my name is Denise Ellamy and I want to talk about the vacant lot that the city is going to court with. Part of the construction that has been completed, I'm being told that there is a restrictive order on his whimsical place, but it appears that on the other side of the bank where the bank was, the grass is not being maintained or anything. So I'm wondering, I'm listening to you guys tonight talk about the ordinance that you guys have.
I'm wondering if when a person takes the city to court are they able to not Go by the ordinance when you file a court document. Does that alleviate you from keeping your property, the grass cut? The buildings looking like it should because Solvang is really starting to look real tacky with all of these buildings that are not completed and I don't know why our If the city is allowing this or if the courts are allowing this, but listening to and reading what was in the agenda.
It appears that you guys have described nuisance and that building on Allisaw on the corner Is a nuisance and it has been for more than 18 months. So my question to the City Council, and maybe it can come up in another meeting or be put on an agenda is why Is it that some builders are getting special treatment or nuisance abatement, or they're getting treated differently than if I were to come here and start a construction? And I would be told immediately that it needs to be done. It's a nuisance.
So, we need to get rules that apply across the board for everyone. It would be nice.
2:52 – 3:0127 turns
Thank you. Is anybody on Zoom that has any comments? Okay I don't see any so I will close it to public comment and come back to the Dias with any further questions, action or motion. I had one, you know, as far as an update. Should you be directed to go forward with this? I'd like you to think of in the VMU, I think a lot of these hours and so forth that they put forth, I'm speculating here because I wasn't there at the time. These hotelers, they didn't want their reviews to go from five star three star because of the jackhammer outside particular hours or weekends And which could easily happen, and or restaurateurs that maybe have a brunch. So be cognizant of our mix of types of properties if you would in that regard, the mixing use.
Anyway. You had looks
like why I that's a really good point because and I think that's why we should distinguish between construction outside of the commercial zone. That has business potential for real business impact if We have protracted construction, noisy construction or real interference like you can think of things like scaffolding or cement trucks that are interfering with
ingress. Sometimes it's our own activities special events of a marathon people getting set up at 7am for the start date or start time
Those are very temporary things, where a construction site is really out of the hands of a restaurant who happens to be next door to the major construction. I think when we look at our... how did you say it Raphael? That were amongst the most aggressive in the Central Coast?
Restrictive.
We're restrictive because I think in the VMU The commercial, the primary commercial zone. There's a rationale for that and we could find flexibility in other areas of the city where it won't feel so onerous. Hours of construction.
There may be modifications at the permit stage
Genuinely my feedback is more focused on the commercial zones than residential. So I'll defer to others about, you know, the non-commercial zones but my thinking is more oriented to making sure that construction can be accelerated in those zones that we have things like incentives or really clear painful penalties for protraction of these projects, or for projects that Sit idle before they are being proposed or applied or even a pre-application and don't Don't look, don't promote the city in a fit-and-finish way. In particular in the commercial zone it affects other people's businesses and I think we need to do the maximum to protect people's businesses and livelihoods and visitors experiences in the city
So that's back to what they're recommending, if I understand it correctly. Is that we would like to direct staff to develop these amendments setting forth that site governance as being defined up here for further consideration at a future council meeting. So I'd like to make that motion.
A motion is not necessary. This is just staff direction? I move to
direct the staff.
Yeah. Is that correct Madam?
You can give the direction in a motion, that's clear for us to know that you all are in consensus.
My notes here say
no motion required. And additionally I would highly recommend we and I know this wasn't a part of the staff report but I think it is time to revisit our vacant property. We've seen some other jurisdictions particularly those that have a good downtown's core, very similar to ours and well not architecturally but in terms of businesses where they have programs that you know where the buildings are vacant however in the storefronts they're able to do signage that are specifically for the area, for the region, for the downtown itself. Not necessarily advertising a good but instead advertising the doings that are going on in the area which help kind of simulate the upkeep of a storefront even though it's vacant and give that... And that's something that could potentially work with the chamber to again, it gives an interest to the storefront even though the storefront is vacant.
So
you're saying the vacant storefront is used as an advertising campaign for the chamber.
For the chamber or city, so I'm going to throw out San Luis Obispo is a great example. So San Luis Obispo it actually rotates each and every season. So right now they're doing some very large vacant spaces but what are they advertising? They're advertising events for the chamber or for the city especially during the holidays and Christmas during fall they do a fall during the summer it's summers in The concerts in the plaza, and these are all in the empty storefronts. And as someone walks by they're actually able to see an advertisement for events that are actually happening in that area versus an empty storefront.
Actually that's a brilliant idea. It's a really good idea because if you're a business and you're a member of the chamber, like that's an incentive to know that the business next door. You don't have, you know, a lot of governance oversight but that someone is upkeeping a business that closes or goes, you know, goes vacant for a while.
The question is do we have to put it
in code? No, but it most certainly as a part of the vacant property we can take a look at what's in the code and maybe refresh it a little bit. But as a sidebar, Direct City Staff to start working with such a program with the Chamber because that is something that I think this our community, we could definitely utilize some of those empty spaces that are there working with the Chamber to spruce up the environment that our pedestrians are walking through. It could be
for music in the park, it could be for farmers market, it could be for all these things. Yes,
it's
added
work for me. Generic to Solvang. That is correct. And again, that's to enhance our brand and it is out of work for the department but ultimately it benefits the city and potentially the chamber and businesses as well.
Well then I'll reconsider if you wish to make a motion
please go ahead. We were told there didn't have to be a motion right? But I'll move that we direct City staff to develop the municipal code including some of the suggestions that have just been made and setting forth the site governance for the regulations for the next council meeting
Can I amend that real quick? I'd like to add that we strengthen the governance framework to include more peer review, so we don't have a single person or a single individual. We have a series of checkpoints inspections and decision makers who conclude when someone's out of compliance and what their fee should be. It is very similar to, you know it comes back to counselor goes to DRC or goes Planning Commission but we should avoid having a single individual or a single member of staff making most of those decisions.
3:01 – 3:1140 turns
Mr. Murphy?
Just to clarify, I thought I heard at the next council meeting. I want to confirm you meant a future council
meeting? I will modify that and say it in future council meetings. Thank
you. And if I can ask for a point of clarification that when you say to bring back potential amendments on-site governance, you're including the construction site appearance regulations revamping construction time limits Where you could have like tiered construction duration, like project duration limits based on the size of the project and amending construction hours. The three buckets that were kind of set out in the as examples in the staff report?
Would
you like to consider all those?
At a minimum but if we don't even have a second on this thing yeah so let's just start over if you don't mind I'm
trying to get clarification on what the direction is. I know there is a motion in this staff report, you can do it that way or you can give staff direction and I think there have been interjections but it sounds like those are all friendly amendments at this point if you want to do it as a motion
I think you've
got a good flavor of how to move forward.
And it's very much, again, it's very much appreciative as we move forward. Because again these are older code sections that haven't been revisited in quite some time and we are now coming up to more issues and really trying to protect our image and our brand at the same token while allowing some flexibility to our builders. So I really appreciate it.
No thank you. Thank for all your do. Okay
we'll move on to item 8B as in Bravo. Would you read that into the record for us please?
Resolution opposing Proposition 43 and joining the no on Prop 443 coalition.
Thank you staff report, please
Good evening, Mayor and Council. This item asks the council to consider Resolution 26-1335 opposing Proposition 43 and joining the No One Prop 43 Coalition. And even though it's in line with the legislative platform because it joins a Prop 43 coalition we wanted to bring it to you. Under current laws, a special tax placed on the general ballot by a city requires two-thirds voter approval and that's a special use tax.
A special tax proposed by residents through the initiative process can pass with a simple majority Beginning January 1st, 2027, Proposition 43 would require those residents initiated measures to receive two-thirds approval as well. Prop 43 is a constitutional amendment placed on the ballot by the legislature. It resulted from an agreement with the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association which withdrew a broader proposed initiative.
Cal Cities identified 28 resident-initiated special taxes approved since 2018, with majority support but less than two-thirds vote. Together those measures were estimated to raise $2.84 billion annually for services including fire response roads parks and libraries None of those would have passed under the proposed threshold. Cal Cities has asked member cities which includes us To adopt opposition resolutions What this means for Solvang is that this measure would not change any revenue the city collects today, but it would affect a future special tax proposed by Solvang residents.
A measure supported by a majority could still fail even if it received less than two-thirds of the vote. The City of Solvang Legislative Platform supports a no on Prop 43 and Sections 3 about public safety support, Section 2 about long term financing for local agencies, and Section 1 to support local control. Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution 26-1335 and authorize the City to join in the No on Prop 43 coalition.
And that concludes staff report. Thank you,
any comments?
Do we know if the legislature is adopting similar measures for themselves?
If the legislature is, so the legislature does not pass measures. Measures are passed by either cities agencies or either cities or agency special districts that are not necessarily resident proposed.
Is the question essentially that the legislature would have to have a two-thirds vote? Yes. No, I don't think there's any bill. I mean, I haven't looked into it but...
Oh,
okay. I don't think there's a companion bill this is just right this would just be addressing initiatives
Okay, it's interesting that they have to play by certain rules and they expect cities to play by a whole different set
of rules. I mean, I don't know off the top my head what the voting requirement is for them to impose.
I believe it's only the legislature themselves that have to vote. I don't think it goes up to the you know, the general voter
population. This is just
about the initiative. Okay, okay. Interesting. Okay. Mr.
Murphy? So I just want to clarify this. Proposition 43 is on the November ballot And the League of Cities has requested its members, which includes us to promote a no vote on that because it takes away local control. That's really one of the driving factors. The way the law has developed up to this point is if we introduce, the city introduces an ordinance that is specific for instance if we wanted to Have a law enforcement tax something that will pay for an increase in the sheriff or law enforcement contract That would require two-thirds majority, but if somebody in the community Wanted to do the same thing it was put on the ballot by referendum. You only need a simple majority and this prop 43 is promoted by the anti-tax groups Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association being the foremost among them to take away that local control and require any tax measure to be the two-thirds supermajority.
So the league has asked the city to adopt a resolution and join the coalition against this measure on the state ballot.
Thank you So in essence, so long as there's a majority it would pass but it doesn't require the two-thirds majority to pass. For initiatives and measures within the city and municipalities
Correct, correct. If it's sponsored by the municipality then it requires a two-thirds vote but if it's a citizen's initiative then it only requires a simple majority.
This is specifically for measures and initiatives that are trying to impose a special tax so right now there's a difference in voting requirement for Municipal started measures versus initiatives, even if they're the exact same special tax law that the voting would be different. Prop 43 if it's passed by a simple majority would make it so that any special tax regardless of how it is whether it's the municipality or special district proposing it or it's started by initiative would require two thirds Vote and Cal Cities is against that because it takes away, makes it harder essentially for local initiatives to pass that could raise local funding.
Are there any requirements of us for either, or is this the extent of what we're being asked? Is this the proposition?
Yeah. We're being asked to pass a resolution and to join the coalition so that we can be listed on their literature. There is no financial commitment requested.
I have a different question, which is what does the what is us joining? How how does our joining the coalition have an impact on the legislation and its success or failure?
Well, the city participates in the League of California Cities because the idea is the more cities that come together on any one piece of legislation or proposition is going to carry a heavier weight than just by ourselves.
So will we be in promotional material for a campaign against
the proposition? It's possible we will be in promotional material on their website and conversely it's possible that then the members of the council can speak about Prop 43. Okay,
and we're consenting to that by passing the resolution? That is correct.
And I also wanted to point out, Olivia touched on it. This normally would not even be coming to council because it is consistent with our legislative platform that council approved some time ago a couple years I think now but because of the ask to pass resolution and also to join the coalition we brought this forward
okay Why don't we seek public comment next. I have one speaker slip from Denise Elamine.
3:11 – 3:1713 turns
Hi, most of our measures and we've had a lot pass. It looks like every two years we get a measure passed here and they are always by residents, the same ones. You can just go back and pull up Measure U and it will give you the form of who the five people who signed to get it on the ballot and these people are business owners here in Solvang So, I think it should be harder. You should have to get two-thirds votes before you raise my taxes and do whatever you want to do with it just like Measure U that you passed and you always say it's for fire and the police and you start off with the big things in the potholes and Measure U Now we're gonna pay $500,000 for a pool for the high school. We're not concerned about the fire and the police now we're just wanting to spend my tax money to put a pool so yes, we as taxpayers should have more say in when you get money and when you don't You guys voting no on it means which your city attorney is I mean your city.
manager here wants, he likes stuff easy and he wants to do whatever he wants to do with the money when he gets it. But me as a taxpayer I don't want anything easy coming out of my pocket you either work hard to get it and show me what you can do with my money or you're not going to get it And you guys voting no, you want it to be a 50-50. You just want it easy. You want to be able to get the residents money without having to do much and that is wrong.
What you need to do is do what you say you're gonna do when you ask for this money, and then you would be able to get the residents to approve your increase or your measure without you having to trick them into 50%. Very well.
We'll move on to bring it back. Is there anybody on Zoom that has anything they'd like to? Okay, very good. Then we'll bring it back here to the dais for further discussion of this item for Proposition 43. Any advocacy or concerns or Other ideas
Well, it is true that these would probably make it harder for tax measures to pass. However sometimes this is the only recourse that jurisdictions have to You know provide infrastructure necessary and the services for our residents
right well Measure U has an oversight committee and that oversight committee authorized the use of funds for the pool. It is not a school pool, it is a community pool. Also,
measure U is not a special tax.
Okay. It's not a dedicated tax. You're correct. Measure U was brought
up
So we don't have any special taxes right now?
We haven't passed any recently, no. I just wanted to clarify too that measure you also had language allowed for recreation and the pool certainly has a recreation use so it is all consistent with the measure.
That was a general fund not specific. Right. So that's one specific use of a general fund I will make a motion to join the non-PROP 43 coalition.
Governance, the dais and an opportunity for voters to vote yet again for us to be a layer of governance on top of a special tax so I think it's quite appropriate.
I think it levels the playing field whether it be initiative or brought forth in a different way. We have a motion in a second for to approve no on Prop 43 coalition. It's a motion to adopt resolution which we didn't say the number but it's 726 1335 and to join the coalition
against proposition 43 I think that was the motion in the second
3:17 – 3:2011 turns
Thank you for restating that. It's been properly moved and seconded, roll call please.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 moved and seconded, roll call
Show transcript
Motion passes 5-0.
Thank you we are now to the point of closing comments if anyone has any please share those with us
yes I will share it that I 100% appreciate the support of the community for Solvang workers. That being said, I'm very disappointed with the amount of misinformation going around numbers that nobody quite knows where they came from And I'm also very disappointed and all the people campaigning for this November that are using it as a photo op and not reaching out to anybody at the city to educate themselves about this issue.
I'd like to
make a comment. I want to do a shout out to the management staff right now, I know they're working double time and it's extremely hard right now this stress on everyone is acknowledged from current staff and the staff on strike, and my peers that this is a difficult situation. It has nothing to do with how much we regard and respect all of our workers and try to work through a fair A fair, respected agreement for us to go forward for the next three years. And that's a difficult thing to do and I hope that the union will come back to the table and reconsider our last offer.
Thank you
well
said I agree.
I will go with ditto so absolutely
Well, I'll say that it will be nice to be at a conference and negotiations with our valued friends and neighbors and co-workers. And I look forward to that time soon. Thank you. We are adjourned at 811. Thank you.