BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant

• The board approved $664,571 in state and federal funding for pandemic and hospital emergency preparedness.
• The funding supports the deployment of medical surge supplies, including over 70,000 respirator masks and 27 ventilators.
• The board acknowledged the Public Health Department’s role in emergency response.

Las Vegas San Pedro Creeks Capacity Improvement Project

• The board approved the final mitigated negative declaration for the project.
• The discussion addressed the project’s impact on flooding in the Goleta area.
• The project involves collaboration with the City of Goleta and Caltrans.

Response to Santa Barbara Civil Grand Jury Report

• The board adopted the county’s response to the Grand Jury report on homeless mentally ill indigent recidivism.
• The response includes a four-month analysis comparing the costs of incarceration versus comprehensive community services.
• The board requested regular updates from the Sheriff’s Department regarding mental health care practices in the jail.
• The response includes a statement that converting the Juvenile Hall would permanently preclude its return to juvenile detention status.

Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program

• The board adopted the RDA continuation ordinance and approved the associated budget revision.
• The board approved a reimbursement agreement to make required remittance payments to the state.
• These actions preserve the county’s options amidst ongoing litigation regarding redevelopment laws.

Seismic Retrofit of San Marcos Road Bridge

• The board approved the award to Brough Construction, rejecting the protest from Sousa Construction.
• Staff verified that Brough made a documented good faith effort to meet the UDBE goal.
• The board directed staff to return with a full report on the CDB/UDBE process and track record.

Workforce Investment Act Youth Contracts

• The board approved the withdrawal of the item from the agenda.

Chapter 21 Appeals and Certificates of Compliance Ordinance Amendment

• The board introduced the ordinance amendment and continued the hearing to October 18, 2011, for final adoption.
• The amendment updates appeals procedures to direct director decisions to the Planning Commission.
• The amendment codifies procedures for Certificates of Compliance and Conditional Certificates of Compliance.

Land Use and Development Code Amendments

• The board reached consensus on several amendments, including removing abalone shell processing from the Ag-2 zone.
• The board clarified that household pets can be kept in any zone district accessory to a residential use.
• The board allowed breweries and winemaking as accessory uses in commercial zones, subject to liquor licenses.
• The board continued the hearing for items requiring further review, such as CUP/DP phasing and oil and gas facilities.
• The board leaned toward the Montecito recommendation for motor vehicle storage limits (1-2-3) based on public support and enforcement concerns.

Proposed Ordinance Regarding Abandoned Vehicles and Material Storage

• The board continued the item to a hearing on November 1st.
• Staff explained the enforcement process, which includes issuing notices of violation and determination of fines.
• The board discussed the definition of "motor vehicles" to ensure coverage of various equipment types.

Resolutions

• The board adopted resolutions proclaiming Hispanic Heritage Month and the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage in California.
• The board honored long-serving county employees Elvia Nye and Pam Smith with resolutions.
• The board honored Kate Reese for her service to the Kachuma Operations and Maintenance Board.
• The board proclaimed October as National Arts and Humanities Month and October 2–8 as National 4-H Week.
• The board honored the Vandenberg Village Lions Club for its 30th anniversary of community service.

Medical Marijuana Storefront Zoning Ordinance

• The board directed staff to return with a recommended ban on medical marijuana storefronts.
• The decision was made due to concerns about criminal activity, money laundering, and state-federal law conflicts.
• The board noted that the moratorium on storefronts expires on December 6, 2011.
• Staff indicated that special hearings by the Planning Commissions must occur by October 18 to meet the November 1 deadline.

Closed Session

• The board entered closed session to discuss the public employee appointment for the Community Services Director.

Opening and Administrative Matters

• Roll Call and Pledge: The meeting commenced with a roll call confirming the presence of all supervisors, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
• Approval of Minutes: A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the September 20, 2011 meeting. The motion passed.
• Agenda Adjustments: The Clerk noted a request to withdraw Item D-4 (Workforce Investment Act youth contracts) from the agenda. Supervisor Wolf requested to pull Item A-22 for immediate discussion.

Administrative Agenda

• Item A-19: Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant
• Discussion: Dr. Wada presented the receipt of $664,571 in state and federal funding for public health pandemic and hospital emergency preparedness. The presentation detailed the deployment of medical surge supplies, including over 70,000 respirator masks, 27 ventilators, and caches for five temporary medical shelters. Supervisor Wolf expressed appreciation for the Public Health Department’s role in emergency response.
• Action: A motion was made and seconded by Supervisor Wolf to approve the item. The motion passed.
• Item A-22: Las Vegas San Pedro Creeks Capacity Improvement Project
• Discussion: Supervisor Wolf spoke regarding the final mitigated negative declaration for the project. The discussion noted the project’s impact on flooding in the Goleta area and its collaboration with the City of Goleta and Caltrans.
• Action: A motion was made and seconded by Supervisor Farr to approve the item. The motion passed.

Public Comment

• Andy Caldwell: Spoke regarding Item 6 (County Land Use and Development Code revisions), clarifying that the controversial events ordinance portion had been removed from the current package and is under separate deliberation by the Planning Commission.
• John Thorndyke: Raised concerns regarding a county property purchase from the US EPA, alleging issues with valuation and road maintenance, and referenced legal constraints on challenging board determinations in court.
• Robert Johns: Criticized the handling of the "IV Halloween" event, alleging that 30,000–50,000 students participate in excessive drinking, and criticized the Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health (ADMHS) Department for not admitting homeless, mentally ill individuals.

Departmental Agenda

• Item 1: Response to Santa Barbara Civil Grand Jury Report
• Discussion: Mr. Vosnitsch from the County Executive Office presented the county’s response to the Grand Jury report on "Homeless Mentally Ill Indigent Recidivism." The report focused on the lack of sustained treatment opportunities for this population. The CEO recommended accepting all findings and taking specific actions, including a four-month analysis comparing the costs of incarceration versus comprehensive community services.
• Supervisor Comments:
• Supervisor Farr supported the cost-comparison study and requested that the analysis include cost estimates for establishing an outpatient treatment center and expanding mental health treatment courts. She expressed concern about the gap in services for those not meeting the strict criteria for state-funded care.
• Supervisor Wolf requested regular updates from the Sheriff’s Department and the contractor (Horizon/PHS) regarding mental health care practices in the jail. She also noted that converting the Juvenile Hall for other uses would permanently preclude its return to juvenile detention status, which should be stated in the response.
• Supervisor Carbajal mentioned a potential CSAC innovation funding opportunity relevant to these issues.
• Dr. Dietrich (ADMHS) explained the current intake and assessment processes, noting limitations in resources for uninsured individuals who do not meet the threshold for involuntary care.
• Motion and Vote: Supervisor Wolf moved to adopt the county response to the Grand Jury report, incorporating the suggested additions from the dais (including the cost-benefit analysis, the statement regarding the Juvenile Hall, and regular reporting from the Sheriff’s Department). The motion was seconded. The motion passed.
• Item 2: Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program
• Discussion: Mr. Russell presented staff recommendations for the County Redevelopment Agency (RDA) to participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program. This involves adopting a continuation ordinance, revising the budget, and entering into a reimbursement agreement to make required remittance payments to the state, preserving the county’s options amidst ongoing litigation regarding redevelopment laws.
• Motion and Vote:
• 1. Supervisor Farr moved to adopt the RDA continuation ordinance (first reading). The motion was seconded. The motion passed. 2. Supervisor Farr moved, acting as the Board of Directors of the RDA, to approve actions six, seven, and eight as listed in the staff report (budget revision and reimbursement agreement). The motion was seconded. The motion passed.
• Item 3: Seismic Retrofit of San Marcos Road Bridge (UDBE Contract Compliance)
• Discussion: This item involved a public hearing regarding a bid protest for the seismic retrofit of the San Marcos Road Bridge. Brough Construction was the apparent low bidder ($738,000). Sousa Construction (second-lowest bidder, $789,000) protested the award, claiming Brough did not meet the 3% Underutilized Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (UDBE) goal or make a good faith effort.
• Staff Report: Mr. Sneddon (Public Works) explained that while bidders are not compelled to meet the UDBE goal, they must make a documented good faith effort if the goal is not met. Staff reviewed Brough’s documentation, which included soliciting 22 UDBE subcontractors and following up via email and phone. Staff verified that one key subcontractor (Superseal) declined to bid due to other commitments. Staff concluded that Brough’s efforts met the quality, quantity, and intensity requirements of 49 CFR 26.
• Supervisor Questions: Supervisors inquired about the verification process for UDBE certifications and the ability to substitute subcontractors. Staff confirmed that UDBE certifications are state-verified and that subcontractor substitution is limited by the Public Contract Code.
• Public Comment:
• Jeff Brough of Brough Construction provided context regarding the appeal.
• Supervisor Carbajal expressed support for staff’s recommendation but requested a follow-up memo or hearing to analyze UDBE goal attainment over the past one to two years. The Supervisor noted that while "good faith effort" is the standard, the board needs to understand if the 3% goal is being consistently met or if it has become pro forma. Supervisor Carbajal requested that staff examine nuances such as advertising timelines to better define "good faith effort" for future quasi-judicial decisions.
• Motion and Vote: Supervisor Wolf moved to approve Items A, B, D, and E, with an addendum requiring staff to return to the board with a full report on the CDB/UDBE process and track record. The motion was seconded. The motion passed.
• Item 4: Workforce Investment Act Youth Contracts
• Discussion: The item involved recommendations regarding the approval of Workforce Investment Act Youth Contracts with the Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County, Santa Ynez Valley People Helping People, and Henkels & McCoy Training Services.
• Motion and Vote: A motion was made and seconded to approve the withdrawal of the item from the agenda. The motion passed.
• Item 5: Chapter 21 Appeals and Certificates of Compliance Ordinance Amendment
• Discussion: Staff presented an ordinance amendment to update appeals procedures under County Code Chapter 21 for consistency with zoning ordinances and to codify procedures for Certificates of Compliance and Conditional Certificates of Compliance. Key changes included:
• Updating who may appeal to include the applicant or an aggrieved person.
• Directing appeals of director or zoning administrator decisions to the Planning Commission, with only Planning Commission decisions appealable to the Board of Supervisors.
• Clarifying appeal content requirements.
• Allowing the director, in consultation with County Counsel, to reject appeals that do not comply with submittal requirements.
• Specifying processing procedures for Certificates of Compliance (ministerial, appealable to the Board) and Conditional Certificates of Compliance (subject to CEQA, reviewed by the Subdivision Development Review Committee, and decided by the Zoning Administrator, appealable to the Planning Commission).
• Questions: Supervisor Wolf inquired about instances where no appeal process is available. Staff clarified that this only occurs when an appeal is rejected for improper filing, a process that exists in current zoning ordinances and is rarely used.
• Motion and Vote: A motion was made and seconded to introduce the ordinance and continue the hearing to October 18, 2011, for final adoption. The motion passed.
• Item 6: Land Use and Development Code Amendments
• Discussion: Staff presented a package of amendments to the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes and the Article 2 Coastal Zoning Ordinance. The package addressed emerging issues, corrected errors, and clarified language. The board discussed various provisions, categorizing them into those ready for approval and those requiring further review.
• Abalone Shell Processing: Deletion of abalone shell processing as a conditionally permitted use in the Ag-2 zone. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Animal Keeping: Clarification that household pets can be kept in any zone district accessory to a residential use. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Campgrounds/Recreational Vehicles: Correction of an error regarding campgrounds and RVs. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• CUP/DP Phasing: Staff noted there is no outside time limit for phasing plans. Supervisor Farr raised concerns about open-ended phasing and CEQA adequacy over long periods. This item was placed on the "comeback" list for further discussion.
• Oil and Gas Facilities: Streamlining permitting to use zoning clearance instead of land use permits. Supervisor Wolf requested more time to review the details. This item was placed on the "comeback" list.
• Indemnification Agreements: Requiring indemnification agreements as part of submittal requirements. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Land Use Permit Expiration: Proposing a one-year expiration for land use permits. Supervisor Gray suggested 18 months due to economic conditions; Supervisor Farr suggested maintaining one year with extension options. This item was placed on the "comeback" list to determine the appropriate timeframe and extension procedures.
• Breweries/Winemaking: Allowing breweries and winemaking as accessory uses in commercial zones. Consensus was reached to proceed, noting that liquor licenses are still required.
• Modifications Not Associated with CUPs/DPs: Applying the waived hearing process for small modifications to the Zoning Administrator. Supervisor Wolf and Supervisor Farr requested further review of the noticing and hearing waiver language. This item was placed on the "comeback" list.
• Residential Second Units: Restoring the ability to apply for residential second units in AG-1 zones. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Shopping Center Zone Use Determinations: Shifting use determinations from the Planning Commission to the Director. Supervisor Wolf suggested ensuring the standard is "similar use." Supervisor Farr expressed discomfort with mandatory "shall" language but accepted the provision after staff explained the appeal process. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Substantial Conformity Determinations: Adding procedures for substantial conformity determinations and amendments following CUPs/DPs. Supervisor Farr and Supervisor Wolf requested further discussion due to concerns about community input and personnel changes. This item was placed on the "comeback" list.
• Surface Mining Zoning Clearance: Allowing zoning clearance to follow CUPs for surface mining. Supervisor Farr requested further discussion regarding the duration of mining permits and phasing. This item was placed on the "comeback" list.
• Trailer Storage: Clarifying that trailers used for hauling watercraft/materials can be stored similarly to motorhomes. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Wastewater Treatment Systems: Conforming definitions to Public Health Department standards. Consensus was reached to proceed.
• Motor Vehicle and Material Storage: Setting maximum limits for vehicle storage on residential properties.
• County Planning Commission Recommendation: 1 car (<10,000 sq ft), 3 cars (10,000-20,000 sq ft), 5 cars (>20,000 sq ft).
• Montecito Planning Commission Recommendation: 1 car (<10,000 sq ft), 2 cars (10,000-20,000 sq ft), 3 cars (>20,000 sq ft).
• Supervisor Carbajal supported the Montecito recommendation (1-2-3) due to enforcement challenges in their district. Supervisor Wolf asked for the rationale behind the County Planning Commission's higher limits. Staff indicated the County Planning Commission viewed 1-3-5 as a reasonable compromise.
• Supervisor Farr raised concerns about screening effectiveness on large lots and the definition of screening. Staff clarified that vehicles must not be visible from public roads or adjoining lots, and that a six-foot solid fence is the standard for material storage, while vehicle storage requires non-visibility.
• Supervisor Wolf suggested using "pervious or impervious" language for driveways to align with environmental goals. Supervisor Carbajal agreed.
• Temporary Uses/Special Events: Staff noted that amendments regarding special events are not included in this package and are still under review by the Planning Commissions.
• Public Comment: Ten members of the public spoke, primarily regarding the motor vehicle and material storage amendment.
• Callum DeForest supported the ordinance, suggested including trailers in the vehicle count, and noted public safety concerns.
• Jean Yamamura supported the lower vehicle limits (1-2-3) and emphasized the visual impact on neighboring properties.
• Michael Bailey cited fire safety risks and supported the maximum of eight vehicles for a three-bedroom house on one acre (aligning with the 1-2-3 limit for larger lots).
• Art Ludwig supported the lower limits and highlighted the inadequacy of six-foot fences for screening on slopes.
• Elizabeth Plummer supported the limit of eight cars.
• Denise Hinkle supported the ordinance for aesthetic, safety, and health reasons.
• Wendy Edmonds supported the ordinance to protect the community's reputation.
• Richard Axelrod, representing the Mission Canyon Association, urged support for the ordinance to address persistent junkyard hoarding issues.
• Randy Reitz was the final speaker (comment not fully transcribed in this segment).
• Motion/Decision: No final motion was taken on the entire package in this segment. The board agreed to proceed with the items marked for consensus and to continue the hearing for the items placed on the "comeback" list. The specific vote on the motor vehicle storage limits (1-2-3 vs 1-3-5) was not explicitly recorded as a separate vote in this transcript segment, but the board leaned toward the Montecito recommendation based on Supervisor Carbajal's statement and public support. The overall item was continued for further deliberation on the contested provisions.

Agenda Item: Proposed Ordinance Regarding Abandoned Vehicles and Material Storage

Discussion

• Public comment was received from Randy Reitz, representing the Mission Canyon Association, who supported the proposed ordinance and credited staff member Noel Langel for his work on the issue. Kathleen Remy, a resident, expressed concerns regarding health and fire hazards associated with a specific property and requested that the vehicle limit be kept at eight.
• Supervisor Lavinino inquired about enforcement mechanisms if a property owner remains non-compliant after the ordinance is passed. Staff explained that the current difficulty lies in the distinction between resource recovery requirements and planning requirements, noting that the property owner has historically demonstrated compliance by making vehicles operable and shielding storage. Staff outlined the enforcement process: issuing a notice of violation, followed by a notice of determination of fine if non-compliance persists after 30 days.
• Supervisor Farr and other board members discussed the definition of "motor vehicles" to ensure the ordinance covers various types of equipment, including RVs, trailers, boats, and fifth wheels. Staff clarified that RVs are separately regulated in the code. The board reviewed a photograph of a property to identify specific items, including a mobile home, to determine how to define and regulate these structures. Supervisor Farr noted that the policy applies to multiple cases throughout the county, not just the specific property in question.
• Supervisor Lavinino raised a concern regarding an existing surface mining permit in the first district that might be affected by a delay in the ordinance. Staff indicated the permit is currently undergoing an appeal process. Supervisor Farr stated that if the issue is not critical, the board should not slow down the process for a single candidate.

Motion and Decision

• A motion was made to continue the item to a hearing on November 1st. The motion was seconded. The board voted in favor, and the motion passed. The board will reconvene in closed session at 12:15 PM.

Agenda Item: Closed Session

• The board entered closed session to discuss the public employee appointment for the Community Services Director.

Agenda Item: Resolutions

Item A-1: Hispanic Heritage Month

• Supervisor Carbajal presented a resolution proclaiming September 15 through October 15, 2011, as Hispanic Heritage Month in Santa Barbara County. The resolution recognizes the contributions of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Judge Frank Ochoa and Paula Lopez were invited to receive the resolution. Both individuals spoke briefly, thanking the board and noting their commitment to mentoring young Hispanic students. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A-2: 100th Anniversary of Women’s Suffrage in California

• Supervisor Carbajal presented a resolution celebrating the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage in California, which occurred on October 10, 1911. The resolution notes that California was the sixth state to grant women the right to vote and that Santa Barbara County voted in favor of suffrage by a margin of 198 votes. Beth Pitton August, co-president of the League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara, accepted the resolution on behalf of the League, emphasizing the importance of informed voting. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A-3: Honoring Elvia Nye

• Supervisor Carbajal presented a resolution honoring Elvia Nye for her 34 years of service to Santa Barbara County, including work with the Sheriff’s Department and the County Assessor. The resolution highlights her contributions to the Assessor’s Property System and her work with the agricultural community. Elvia Nye spoke briefly, thanking the board. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A-4: Honoring Pam Smith

• Supervisor Carbajal presented a resolution honoring Pam Smith for her 35 years of service to Santa Barbara County, including work with the Auditor and Assessor. The resolution notes her progression from Real Estate Appraiser I to Division Manager and her oversight of major functions during the economic downturn. Pam Smith spoke briefly, thanking the board and her colleagues. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A5: Resolution Honoring Kate Reese

• The Board considered a resolution honoring Kate Reese upon her retirement from the Kachuma Operations and Maintenance Board (COMB). The resolution recognized her 18 years of service, including her role as the first woman to serve as General Manager, and her leadership in securing the water supply for Lake Kachuma, implementing infrastructure projects, and supporting environmental stewardship. Ms. Reese accepted the resolution, noting the project supplies approximately 85% of the water to the South Coast and San Ynez Valley. She stated she would continue to serve as manager for the Kachuma Conservation Release Board. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A6: Resolution Proclaiming National Arts and Humanities Month

• The Board considered a resolution proclaiming October as National Arts and Humanities Month and October 7, 2011, as California Arts Day. The resolution acknowledged the County Arts Commission’s role in providing outreach, education, and exhibitions. Barbara Berger, Chair of the Arts Commission, and Rita Berry accepted the resolution on behalf of the commission. Ms. Berger noted the Commission’s 28-year relationship with the City of Santa Barbara and its participation in the statewide celebration. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A7: Resolution Proclaiming National 4-H Week

• The Board considered a resolution proclaiming October 2–8, 2011, as National 4-H Week in Santa Barbara County. The resolution highlighted 4-H as the nation’s largest youth development organization and its role in teaching skills in science, citizenship, and healthy living. A representative for the 4-H program spoke, noting recent growth in enrollment and new projects, including robotics and tree planting. The representative also introduced a local 4-H leader involved in dairy goat, horticulture, and wildlife projects. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item A8: Resolution Honoring the Vandenberg Village Lions Club

• The Board considered a resolution honoring the Vandenberg Village Lions Club for its 30th anniversary of community service. The resolution detailed the club’s support for local schools, youth, the Vandenberg Air Force Base, sight and hearing conservation, and assistance to the disabled and elderly. Representatives from the Lions Club accepted the resolution, expressing appreciation for the Board’s recognition of their service. The resolution was passed and adopted.

Item 7: Medical Marijuana Storefront Zoning Ordinance

• The Board held a hearing to consider recommendations from the Montecito and County Planning Commissions to amend the county land use and development code regarding commercial medical marijuana collective and cooperative storefronts. Staff presented the proposed ordinance, which aims to protect sensitive uses while providing regional access to medical marijuana. Key provisions include:
• A 1,500-foot minimum buffer between storefronts.
• A 1,000-foot minimum buffer from schools, parks, and daycare centers.
• A 300-foot minimum buffer from residential and mixed-use zones.
• A 100-foot minimum buffer from legal dwellings within commercial zones.
• All applications subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process.
• Staff noted that the moratorium on storefronts expires on December 6, 2011, and cannot be extended. If no action is taken, medical marijuana dispensaries are not an enumerated use in the code and are therefore prohibited, though applicants could seek a "similar use" determination. Staff presented three options; the recommended option allows for up to seven potential storefronts countywide.
• Supervisors and staff discussed the scope of the ordinance, noting it regulates zoning only and does not address cultivation, transportation, or operator characteristics. Questions were raised regarding the exclusion of private recreation centers from the buffer requirements, with staff explaining that such uses could be considered during the CUP review process. Concerns were also raised about the legal status of cultivation and the conflict between state and federal laws.
• Under Sheriff Jim Peterson of the Sheriff’s Department stated that the department supports a ban due to concerns about criminal activity, money laundering, and the conflict between state and federal laws. He noted that approximately 30% of California counties have bans on such storefronts.
• Public comment was received from five speakers. One speaker criticized the Board for not acting sooner to prevent the establishment of clinics in the first district. Another speaker, who provides medical cannabis, supported the ordinance but requested amendments to allow for edible products and off-site deliveries for homebound patients. A third speaker recommended further study due to regulatory challenges. A fourth speaker emphasized compassion for patients and argued against a ban, stating that regulation is necessary but access should not be eliminated. The final speaker expressed concern that the proposed zoning would limit access in North County and supported the allowance of edibles.
• Supervisor Lavagnino stated she supported a ban due to the conflict of laws and noted that access remains available in the City of Santa Barbara. Supervisor Farr stated she could not support a ban but supported the staff recommendation as a middle ground that provides a permit path with strict buffers and CUP requirements. Supervisor Carbajal stated she was undecided, citing the complexity of the issue and the Sheriff’s recommendation for a ban. Supervisor Wolfe indicated she would not move forward with the ordinance if a ban was supported.
• Supervisor Farr moved to adopt the staff recommendation. There was no second. Supervisor Lavagnino then moved to direct staff to return with a recommended ban. This motion was seconded. The Board voted 4 to 1 to direct staff to return with a recommended ban.

Agenda Item: Timeline for Ordinance Review and Moratorium Status

• Discussion: The Secretary to the Planning Commissions provided an update on the timeline required to return the matter to the Board by November 1. It was stated that a special hearing by the Montecito Planning Commission and a hearing by the County Planning Commission must both occur on or before October 18 to meet the November 1 deadline. It was noted that if these dates are not met, the moratorium may lapse, potentially allowing for use determination applications before a ban is implemented. The Secretary indicated uncertainty regarding whether the November 1 deadline could be met.
• Decision/Vote: No motion was made, seconded, or voted upon in this segment.

Agenda Item: Board Member Reports and Adjournment

• Discussion: The Clerk of the Board requested final comments from board members. One member reported that Mayor Lovanino has announced he will not run for re-election. The same member also noted the upcoming 75th anniversary of the Veterans Memorial Building in Lompoc and acknowledged attendees Dennis Marshall and Sandy Marshall.
• Decision/Vote: The Clerk of the Board stated that the meeting was adjourned. No formal motion to adjourn was recorded in the transcript, nor was a vote taken.