BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 May 8, 2012

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:0510 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role0:26 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Regular meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors of May 8th. Mr. Allen, would you call the roll please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:33 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Here. Mr Carbajal who's in Santa Barbara? Here. Ms. Wolfe? Here Ms. Gray? Here Ms. Farr?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role0:42 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Here Would you all

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈21s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role0:43 · ≈ 9:00 AM

please rise with me for the Pledge of Allegiance

Thank you. And as we have Supervisor Carbajal in Santa Barbara, we are going to be doing a roll call vote for everything that we do today. So the next thing we need to take up is the approval of the minutes of our meeting of May 1st. We have a motion and I have a second. Mr. Allen would you call the roll please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:27 · ≈ 9:01 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Aye. Mr Carbajal? Aye. Ms. Will? Aye. Ms. Graham? Aye, Ms. Farr? Aye

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:35 · ≈ 9:01 AM

5-0. Thank you and then we will go to public comment if anybody here to speak on public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42 · ≈ 9:01 AM

Madam Chair members of the board we have one request to speak from Mr. John Pratt. Mr. Pratt

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:54 · ≈ 9:01 AM

Good morning

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:55 · ≈ 9:01 AM

Hi, good morning. It's an honor for me to be here to address the Board of Supervisors. I've been a resident of this county for eight of the last 14 years. I'm also the commander over in Lompoc of American Legion Post 125 and I come to you this morning to speak on behalf of veterans of all parts of this county. We don't normally do a lot of talking And most of the veterans that I know, my dad included who was a World War II veteran passed away. We just have done our duty and we like to get along but I must be an advocate here today and I must make you aware of situation that came to my attention last week.

And I also spoke well I spoke with Supervisor Gray last night at the candidates forum in Lompoc and the other two candidates I have heard in the rumor mill that, and you know how rumors go, that in the South County the Veterans Service representative is retiring soon. And we lost the Veterans Service Organization office a year or so ago in Lompoc. And now we're down to one person that works here in this building actually does a very fine job.

However, I want to make you aware and In the future, I'll give you some facts and figures that I have. That we're concerned as a veterans organization that the service of our veterans in Santa Barbara is going to decline. Here's why it's important. In one fiscal recent fiscal year claims that were submitted within this county and the county has veteran service officers as delegated or approved by the state to happen and they have in many other states, by the way.

We have a $4 million impact to this county for people that put in claims and they are now receiving compensation in terms of their own personal medical disabilities and or fee waivers for their dependents for the state schools. That's four million dollars that comes into this county I will tell you that I wouldn't be here today if I weren't receiving veterans compensation myself, because it's just very expensive to live here. And I love this area and it is one of the greatest places to live. Now what I would like you to think about and address in the future, and we can speak offline later, is the fact that we may be down to one service rep within the whole county. That's going to impact The homeless vets and any other vet, if a person has a claim and they're living down in Santa Barbara do they have to make an appointment at Santa Maria?

I know somebody that recently tried to make an appointment with the service rep here and they were told I'll see you on July 1st. That's a pretty long wait. So, I'm just trying to ring the bell here of warning. I know that this is a beautiful, wonderful place to live. I know that Santa Barbara as a whole very much supports veterans so I want you to be aware of what's going on and what might potentially going on. And let's work together. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:04 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Madam Chair we have one additional request to speak from Dr. Robert Johns in Santa Maria. Pardon me, Santa Barbara.

0:05 – 0:108 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:35 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Okay, I don't think the mic is on. Should I just say something? Would Supervisor Carbajal turn on the podium light there where he's sitting in Santa Barbara? Thank you.

CommentSharon RoseProposed6:10 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Nice little play there, threw me off my game. Okay now good morning Supervisor Carbajal. Sorry. Local 721 who still have not received justice from this county, local 721 Carver Hall and the Board of Supervisors have given a 3.5 budget Cut in this county, the latest report is they're doing well. Doing very well as far as general fund and taxes. You need to begin to meet with local 721.

And Carvajal your wife still works for the county and that was discussed last week not your wife but other conflict of interest. It is election time and please don't run your election during the Knicks heat game because you're disturbing me. Now, this thing about Levy, Carbajal and Rick Caruso. Now this assessment committee that's a Carbajal-run committee. There has been no change and we all have to keep our ears to the ground Carboha, I have a minute and 22 seconds.

Carboha here runs that assessment committee So you can you know they come up with a decision well a little bit too confused And so they're trying to throw our through off throw us off our game There will be a backdoor attempt To run around the inn there will be a back door attempt to run around in by carbohol and Rick Caruso to get that TOT. That's still there, it's still there keep it in mind I got 45 seconds and like to say Carver Hall I want to see those environmentalists at the next meeting of the Caruso bamboozle now they go to Gaviota why don't they go to Caruso's property snakes I got 27 seconds Snakes, rats, everything is out there. 22 seconds and we need those environmentalists to do an impact report on the Caruso Carbohal Bamboozle Project.

Thank you board members, thank you.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role8:56 · ≈ 9:08 AM

All right and then Supervisor Gray, you had something for public comment. Yeah thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:59 · ≈ 9:08 AM

you Chair Farr. We have a problem on 246 that I've talked to Ms. Waller about. Caltrans because of safety decided to build around roundabout at Parisma Road But what they did is they took a city size roundabout and put it on a high speed road. So what's happening now is people are like shooting over the top, going around the side, skid marks. They've even went so far this is in the middle of a field to put sidewalks and Disability ramps. I mean, they just took some city roundabout and stuck it on a high-speed 65 mile an hour road.

So, I talked to Miss Waller about it on Friday, I think it was, and gave her the pictures. And so, I like that we...I don't know what to do. I mean, I'm...we're all really, really concerned. Doreen have you driven it yet? I don't know if you've driven it.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role10:12 · ≈ 9:10 AM

I think once while it was just being finished construction but you do have to slow way,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed10:18 · ≈ 9:10 AM

way down.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role10:19 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Have you spoken with Caltrans as far as the monitoring that they're doing?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed10:24 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Over and over again and Caltrans we started years ago to fight this thing because it wasn't appropriate And we went as high, I and the Lompoc citizens went as high as Lieutenant Governor and couldn't get Caltrans stopped on this because in their wisdom they think that this is the solution. And it may be the solution but it certainly isn't working for the Lompoc Chairwoman, Supervisor yes as you noted you shared pictures with me on Friday that indicate that there are several individuals that are overrunning

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:11 – 0:114 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed11:08 · ≈ 9:11 AM

the roundabout and not being able to traverse it. So my office is working with our Public Works folks to prepare a letter to Caltrans ensuring that they're aware of this situation and requesting that they do monitor it and take appropriate corrective actions, and I would anticipate that letter to go out this week.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:29 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Thank you well and we'll I think we need to continue to monitor this

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role11:34 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Thank you. Thank you. All right, and that is the end of public comment and then we'll move on to our administrative agenda. Are there any items that we need to pull?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:46 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board. I just have one quick correction on item 813. This is from Public Works The request that the board consider recommendations regarding the storm damage repair and Paradise Road

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:57 · ≈ 9:11 AM

at milepost 2.5 This is north of State Highway 54 it indicates on the agenda. This is the third district That's actually the second districts. I just wanted to correct the record And then we have requests to speak on item a7 and item a11 a 7 and

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role12:13 · ≈ 9:12 AM

a 11

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:15 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Yes.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role12:16 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Okay, can I go ahead and have a motion to approve the balance of administrative agenda? Motion in a second all right Mr. Allen we'll have to do a roll call on this then.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:28 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Mr Carbajal? Aye. Ms. Wolff? Aye Ms. Gray? Aye Miss Farr?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role12:36 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Aye Thank you all right why don't we go back then to A7

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:42 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board. Item A7 is from Community Services. The request is that the board consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Home Consortium and CDBG-Urban County Partnership 2012 Annual Action Plan and annual action plan substantial amendments for 2008 through 2011 and Jeff Bard would like to speak on that in Santa Barbara.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role13:03 · ≈ 9:13 AM

Mr. Bard? Supervisor Carbajal you need to turn the podium mic back on again.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction13:23 · ≈ 9:13 AM

Madam Chair and members of the board, thank you for the opportunity to address this item. You should have received a late email which included some specifics emphasizing The federal shift to prevention of homelessness, which is a good thing and not a bad thing. But I think that particular strategy overlooks perhaps addressing the needs of the actual homeless vets and homeless other persons.

I'm not going to reiterate what's in the note. I hope you read it. I realize we're probably gonna have to go ahead and approve it As written, I'm hoping on the next cycle that the Human Services Commission might spread the money a little thinner because we all know there's some very worthy programs that didn't get funded. And we may find ourselves regretting that. I noticed that according to the Washington update that was presented to the Legislative Policy Committee yesterday House Budget Resolution is getting marked up by ways and means.

And there's the possibility that there's going to be jeopardy of Title 20 social services block grants. There are people throughout the county that really do rely upon these programs to keep their children healthy, fed and in school. I don't know if They're going to be able to successfully hold up our social services block grant funding, but if they do that's going to emphasize all the more the importance of the Community Development Block Grant and the Emergency Solutions Grant money.

So you know just I realize you're gonna probably approve it and they did a good job of soliciting citizen participation. It's incumbent upon the citizens To come to the board and make

0:15 – 0:194 turns

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction15:26 · ≈ 9:15 AM

public comment, I know a lot of times there's some kind of wacky public comment but that comes with the territory. And in there, there's always a kernel of truth of some kind and I think it's...I'm not blaming the board. I'm certainly not blaming CSD but I would hope that there would be more participation in the decision-making process and hopefully get maybe more smaller grants out there, seed money, encourage new projects going forward so I'll just rest on that and the written comments that I've already submitted. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:04 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Dr. Robert Johns, inside of Barbara on the same item, A7.

CommentSharon RoseProposed16:31 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Yes, I am Dr. Robert L. Johns, Ph.D., clinical psychologist. I also can add to that sports psychologist, educational psychologist and some other aspects of that which I don't want to discuss here but I'm a graduate of the University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 1973 Now for the first time these funds, these HUD funds have been delegated properly. I've heard a lot of back talking but for the first time we have a proper committee and these funds have been delegated properly. I said that twice to reemphasize I don't need time to make my point as you all know So what do we have here?

What we have is a continuation of federal funds that will not be used in mixed for issues that don't concern people dipping into these federal funds trying to get some money. And as I noticed the testimony last week, I saw supervisors attempting to change the grant and trying to lobby for their favorite charities. I would like for some of this to go behind the scenes so that the public do not have to witness this type So some of this should have been left behind the scenes.

And I'd like to see that left behind the scenes. The supervisors know how to conduct a behind-the-scenes meeting, but I guess and I have about 56 seconds here, but I guess when it comes to this HUD money, this free money almost They must have a lot of favorite charities. Or should I say non-profit? I have to remind you, this is not cref money. This is federal dollars.

So I'd like to see some of this played out behind the scenes. Thank you. I end with 28 seconds. Maybe you can give them to someone else.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role19:11 · ≈ 9:19 AM

All right and so now we'll go to A11.

0:19 – 0:2314 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:16 · ≈ 9:19 AM

We have a request to speak on A11 from Beverly Taylor. This item is from general services and probation and the request is that the board consider recommendations regarding the establishment of the probation vocational print shop program in the transfer of space and reprographic division assets from general services to the probation department. Good morning, Chief Taylor. Thank

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role19:35 · ≈ 9:19 AM

you for being here.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated19:37 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Chair Farr and Supervisors. My name is Beverly Taylor, Chief Probation Officer and I'm excited for the probation department to have the opportunity to add one more vocational program for the youth at the Los Prados Boys Camp and Academy. Yesterday we had an open house and ribbon-cutting event Celebrating the transition from general services to probation. The students from the Los Prados Business Center, which is what we're calling the new reprographics area and youth from our culinary program who were there were amazed and grateful for the support and faith shown to them by the county family.

And during my debrief with them they recognized that the Los Prados Business Center was birthed by an idea from Supervisor Wolf They also recognized firsthand how working together we can accomplish great things. So I would like to formally thank Supervisor Wolf, General Services Director Bob Nisbet and our past chief Patricia Stewart whose energy made this program a reality and also on behalf of the young men they had a token of their appreciation that they wanted me to give to the Board of Supervisors Just a notepad with their address and phone number and email address so we're ready to take jobs. So

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role21:01 · ≈ 9:21 AM

thank you. This is just really, really wonderful. Supervisor Lavagnino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7121:05 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Thank you Madam Chair and congratulations Supervisor Wolff. I read this and I know we had talked about it but just going through all the details of it, actually taking something that was costing us money. We turn it around turning into a vocational training for some kids that really need it. I think since I'm sitting in Supervisor Carbajal's chair I can actually call this a win-win.

So I do. Congratulations. I think this is just a great, great idea and congratulations also to Chief Taylor and Chief Stewart. Great job.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role21:43 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Yes, I totally agree. Supervisor Wolf. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed21:46 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Thank you. Well, you know ideas are cheap but it's really the people on the ground who have made this a reality And I just want to thank our probation staff, Bev Taylor, Chief Stewart, all the folks from the camp and Bob Nesbitt and his staff. This is an amazing feat that happened in less than a year. And to see the faces of those kids working down there, it's truly remarkable. And it really is a testament to this county family and how they can get things done. So I just want to thank all of you for pulling this together.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role22:37 · ≈ 9:22 AM

All right, so I'll go ahead then and entertain a motion on the balance of the administrative agenda.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7122:43 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Madam Chair, can I pull A19 really quickly just

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role22:46 · ≈ 9:22 AM

to...

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7122:46 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Okay.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role22:47 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Yeah you want to speak to those first? Go

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7122:49 · ≈ 9:22 AM

ahead. A18 and 19.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:51 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board item 18 and A19 are from Supervisor Levin. You know those are appointments one of Bob Engel to the Santa Maria Cemetery District Board and the other of Gail Pratt to the Commission for Women.

0:23 – 0:2810 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7123:04 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Thank you very much. I think Mr. Engel is here, I think he's going to be receiving a proclamation here in a minute but just wanted to commend him for stepping up. I know he's got a full plate handles of business here in town, a community leader but he has decided to serve on one of our probably toughest committees and that's sitting on the Cemetery Board District. I don't think he knew that when I asked him to do it but I appreciate that and also Gail Pratt I've had an opening on the Commission for Women for a long time, and I've been searching for the right person. Can't think of a better person than Gail. She's a leader in the community. She is involved in many, many charitable organizations.

Gail, thank you very much for being here, and Godspeed to both of you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role23:49 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Thank you. And thank you for your willingness to serve. I mean, we have so many wonderful boards and commissions that really help us do the work of County government, but obviously we couldn't have them if we didn't have people like yourselves willing to step up and volunteer your time. So thank you very much. All right. We'll go ahead then and have a motion to approve the balance of the administrative calendar. So move motion in a second Mr Allen,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:14 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Mr. Carbajal Aye. Ms. Wolff?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role24:19 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:19 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Ms. Gray? Aye. Ms Farber?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role24:22 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Aye, thank you and now we will go back to our wonderful resolutions that are going to be presented today. The first one is from Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:30 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Gray.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role24:31 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you very much

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:33 · ≈ 9:24 AM

and you know resolutions are resolutions and you read the words and you know what's being said but this resolution that I'm going to be presenting today is to a group of Amazing people that came up with the idea that Santa Maria has talent. And they're going to talk about this a bit more than I am, but I got to go watch this and what happened was You could feel the warmth in the audience because they had found a venue to perform.

And you know, any of us that have taken our kids to dancing from the time they were like two years old and watched that happen or they've learned to sing sometimes there's just not a venue for I mean maybe we're not going to get on The Voice or Dancing with the Stars But it, I'm just, it actually felt like it in the Santa Maria has talent thing. So I thought okay the least we can do is recognize the Santa Maria Rotary group that you guys are the breakfast group right? Dinner dinner don't say that sorry but some others have talent too So you guys are the dinner group. And it's just a lot of work, a lot of work to organize three days, three nights and people with talent and microphones and lights and all these different excited folks. So I'm sorry if I talk too much but I wanted you to know what a job they did.

So Mr. Allen, if you'll be the fellow that will read this, I'm going to go down there and shake these people's hands. Let me introduce them. Yes, yes. Vicki Connors. And Diane Bailey and Georgia Shore. And come on up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:28 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, this is item A-1. It's a resolution recognizing the Santa Maria Has Talent Community Talent Show and Fundraiser. Whereas 2012 marked the third annual Santa Maria Has Talent, a local talent show and fundraiser which provides a forum for talented people in the Santa Maria community to share their talents and win awards and recognition. The event is sponsored by the Rotary Club of Santa Maria South.

Whereas some 50 men, women and children of all ages from across the Santa Maria Valley compete for the grand prize of $1,000. The talented participants sing, dance and play musical instruments as they audition for one of the final 20 spots. A surprising number even write their own material competing for the best original song award. And whereas all winners are selected by a panel of experts, besides the category for overall winner, first runner up, second runner up and best original song. Winners are selected in the categories of Best Instrumentalist, Adult and Youth, Outstanding Achievement in Singing, Adult Teen and Child, Outstanding Achievement in Dance, Adult and Youth and the audience votes for their favorite for the Santa Maria Favorites Award which is a people's choice award.

I would like Thank you. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes the Santa Maria Has Talent Community Talent Show and Fundraiser, all the community members without whose participation the show would not be possible, and The Rotary Club of Santa Maria South for their annual sponsorship of the wonderful event passed and adopted today by the board.

not transcribed≈37s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:28 – 0:302 turns

PresenterDiane BaileySanta Maria Has Talent and as a founding director because our new director for 2Proposedself-stated28:37 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Well, we are honored and so pleased to accept this recognition. I'm Diane Bailey. I am a member of Santa Maria Rotary South. I am the founding director of Santa Maria Has Talent and as a founding director because our new director for 2013 is Georgia Shore who is right here. In 2010 we came up with the idea that A talent show would be a good fundraiser and we really thought surely this community would have a lot of talent but we didn't know.

So, we just took it on faith that anybody that wanted to be in could be in and so they just showed up and I thought well we'll see what happens. I didn't know if they could really sing. I didn't know if they could really do anything. Well low and behold we have amazing talent The first person that sang during rehearsals, I thought oh we have a show. I mean we have wonderful talent here and not just at PCPA. I mean these are just from the community. These are grandfathers and grandkids in all ages and all kinds and then on top of it we found that the people who came we purposefully even though it was a fundraiser we kept the tickets very inexpensive they're five dollars apiece Except for the finals and their $10 because we wanted whole families to come.

And that's exactly what happened a huge cross section of the community came together, laughed, clapped and had a wonderful time. And it just turned out to be far, far more than we ever expected of a talent show. And it is really a show. I mean, as she was, uh, as, Supervisor Joni Gray said, we have lights and costumes and glitter and glamour and all of that sort of thing. And it's a lot of fun. And it's been a great privilege for me to be a part of this. And thank you so much for this resolution.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role30:52 · ≈ 9:30 AM

All right. Our next resolution will be presented by Supervisor Lavagnino.

0:31 – 0:354 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7131:01 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Thank you Madam Chair. I've got a resolution proclaiming this week as Compost Awareness Week, and I think I got this one because I'm pretty good at spreading the ball around. But we're going to applaud the efforts of Ingle & Gray here in Santa Maria as well as Valley Compost in Buelton. We're here to try to educate the public today on how to reduce materials going into our landfill and also decrease our dependence on chemical fertilizers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:35 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, this is a resolution proclaiming May 6th through 12th 2012 as Compost Awareness Week. Whereas the composting councils of Canada, Australia, United Kingdom and the United States have declared the first week of May to be the annual international composting awareness week. And whereas, organic materials suitable for composting represent up to 70% of materials that could be landfilled each year and composting is an effective form of waste reduction, reuse and recycling. And home composting and mulching is a way households can reduce the volume of waste generated at home by taking individual responsibility for keeping waste reduction costs down.

And whereas compost improves the soil structure, reduces erosion and runoff, supplies soil with a variety of macro and micronutrients, enables compost-emitted soils to use less water. And using sustainable soil enriching compost helps prevent erosion of valuable topsoil without depleting valuable wildlife habitats. And whereas community sustainability is enhanced by composting green waste, biosolids and other organic materials and promoting the use of renewable resources in landscaping, horticulture and agriculture.

And whereas composting programs would benefit from increased awareness of the benefits of adding organic materials to the soil thereby increasing the demand for compost and mulch products And returning organic resources to the soil is a method of decreasing the dependence on chemical fertilizers, decreasing erosion, reducing water consumption and non-point pollution. Whereas the County of Santa Barbara has initiated green waste collection programs with its franchise haulers to aid in the efforts of environmental sustainability. In England Gray Inc., Regional Composting Facility, Santa Maria and Valley Compost and Topsoil Inc. Buelton have been successfully composting organic materials for sustainable agricultural practices. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims the week of May 6th through 12, 2012 as Compost Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County.

Passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:36 · ≈ 9:33 AM

Chair Fellow Supervisors, I'd like to thank you very much for recognizing Compost Awareness Week as Market Development Chair for the United States Composting Council. We really strive to get the word out across the country about compost and the many benefits and just have you recognize this year in and year out is I just so much appreciate it because the value of compost we're With our regional composting facility in Santa Maria, we're now over a hundred thousand yards of compost produced on an annual basis taking all the beneficial waste. Today we're hauling tomato residue from the new greenhouses and composting that.

We're taking biosolids from Laguna Sanitation who's on your agenda today So we're taking all these beneficial organic feedstocks and making great, great compost. And people are enjoying it with healthy gardens, healthy lawns, great parks, great overpasses. You'll see at Winchester Canyon we're delivering a couple of thousand yards. It's being stockpiled there for Caltrans to put in the landscaping down there so thank you very much appreciate it.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role34:49 · ≈ 9:34 AM

And thank you Mr. Engel for these beautiful symbols of spring and of the work that you do, and as somebody who's enjoyed putting in a vegetable garden every year for decades, Supervisor Lavagnino, you're not the only one that spread some compost around so... Okay we'll go on now to A3 also from Supervisor Lavagnino

0:35 – 0:408 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7135:08 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Thank you again, Madam Chair. If I could have Frank Campo please come up? Today's resolution will be claiming the month of May as Military Appreciation Month in Santa Barbara County. I know all of us here on the board have a great appreciation for the work that our veterans have done. My eyes have been opened by working on this Stand Down project and I apologize to anybody who is trying to park in the parking lot we have our pods unit out there that is slowly stacking up with stuff that we're going to be handing out to our veterans But today we're going to be talking about increasing employment opportunities for our veterans. And Frank is the Employment Rep for the Employment Development Department with the State of California.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:50 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, Item A3 is a resolution proclaiming May 2012 as Military Appreciation Month in Santa Barbara County. Whereas the people of our community have great appreciation and admiration for the many local men and women who serve their country in the armed forces to protect and preserve the freedoms enjoyed by our community and all Americans.

And whereas in war, international conflicts and peacekeeping missions men and women have been wounded, taken prisoners and died in the line of duty. And whereas veterans possess a wide variety of valuable job qualifications and skills including experience, maturity, leadership and loyalty that make them ideal candidates for employment. And whereas Veteran Workforce Specialists, Veteran Employment Support Specialists and other Employment Development Department staff are committed to ensuring that Veterans receive the services and programs to which they are entitled and to promoting their employer interest in hiring Veterans.

Now therefore be it resolved and ordered that the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County proclaims May 2012 as Military Appreciation Month in Santa Barbara County, and urges all local employers, organized labor, veteran organizations, and other government leaders to support this worthy campaign to increase employment opportunities for the men and women who have faithfully served our nation in the military. Passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed37:12 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Madam Chair and Board, I'd like to thank you for this proclamation. And following Mr. Ingle when he gave out those beautiful flowers, I'm thinking well, I have nothing to bring to the board. But then when Steve was talking about the pods, the pods was kind of my suggestion. We would get all these donations for our stand down which is October 13th and we're thinking where are we going to house them at? So I got with Dave Cross and I said Dave maybe there's a local company here in town that has a storage unit that can let us store them Well, that comes to the pod situation. So I guess I'm responsible for the pods in the parking lot so I did bring something.

But as Supervisor Lavaniego said my name is Frank Campo and I am the local Veterans Employment Representative for Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. I travel to Santa Barbara City, Santa Maria and San Luis. I have a tough job trying to get our veterans employed. We have some help from the President on November 21st. He passed some additional tax credits to allow employers to hire veterans, so if you're an employer and you want a good candidate, a good employee, hire a veteran.

I'd also like to talk about...I talked about the stand-down October 13th here in Santa Maria. It's a wonderful thing. First time Santa Maria has had one for the past 10 years we've had a stand down at San Luis Obispo I think the one we're having here in Santa Maria is going to be ten times a lot better because we have a lot more support for the one here. So, I encourage everyone to show up for that date May 24th. I left some flyers on the back table back there but also I've been involved with the Veterans Treatment Court here in Santa Maria with Judge Flores trying to assist our veterans with some judicial problems plus getting them employed.

My job mainly is to get veterans employed, but if I can't my job is to refer them to outside agencies that can assist. And one of those agencies was already spoke on was the County Veteran Service Officer. I see probably 300 veterans a month. I refer probably half of those to Rhonda and if the rumors are true that we're going to cut the Santa Barbara office Then I implore you to give her some additional help because as my colleague from law folks says, Ron is backed up almost two months seeing veterans. And when the average claim is almost a year and half two years to get a claim done that just compounds the situation so thank you

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role39:37 · ≈ 9:39 AM

Thank you Mr. Campo, and actually before you leave the podium I had a question for you. I read a very interesting article about how returning veterans were being connected with family farmers particularly farmers that were older and were thinking about getting out of farming And I also heard that the Carpenters had a project called Helmets to Hard Hats. So is that something that you've been, those couple areas have you been working on and connecting our veterans too?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed40:09 · ≈ 9:40 AM

I'm familiar with Helmets to Hard Hats. California, the construction boom really hasn't been what it is. Most of those are in areas that have building growth. I am aware of it also the farm situation, the farmers. That was started I believe down in San Diego where a farmer took veterans on and it was more of a rehabilitation because of their TBI and PTSD situations.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role40:37 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Okay, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed40:37 · ≈ 9:40 AM

you. We can do it here though too?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role40:39 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Yes I think it would be a good thing. Thank you. All right and then I guess we do have one more resolution to present from Supervisor Gray.

0:40 – 0:465 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:49 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Thank You Madam Chair my resolution now is to the Wampoag Elks and we have Terry Hetzel. Terry come on up. Terry is the Youth Activity Chairman And Janet Gurley and Terry Gurley. Terry is the leading knight, and what these folks do is if you just stand right by the podium I'll be down in a moment. What they do is recognize the youth and their their scholarship.

We went to one last in Santa Maria last Wednesday night and it was amazing to see what these young people are doing and I want to thank the Elks for recognizing these folks so Mr. Allen if you'll read this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:35 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, this is a resolution proclaiming May 6th through May 12, 2012 as Elks National Youth Week in Santa Barbara County. Whereas, National Youth Week has been designated to honor America's junior citizens for their services to our community, state and nation. And whereas, the benevolent and protective order of Elks, Lompoc Lodge No. 2274 will sponsor observance during that week in tribute to the youth of this community. The Board who in the years ahead will assume the responsibility for the advancement of our free society are deserving of our support. And whereas, we should in all ways possible demonstrate our understanding of their hopes and dreams, our partnership with our youth and our willingness to prepare them for the responsibility of citizenship.

Now therefore be it ordered and resolved that the Board of Supervisors proclaims May 6th through 12th 2012 as Elks National Youth Week in Santa Barbara County pass and adopt it today.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentTerri HetzelProposedself-stated42:40 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Good morning Madam Chair and Supervisors. My name is Terri Hetzel and I'm the Youth Activities Chairman for our local Elks Lodge in Lompoc, number 2274. This week is Elk's National Youth Week in which all our lodges across the United States recognize The kids in their community and focus on their achievements. Last night we did kick off the week with our student of the month, student of the year banquet dinner.

These were 32 students that were awarded monetary awards up to about $2,000 for both their scholastic and academic achievements in our community. Wednesday and Thursday, we'll be recognizing two of our elementary schools for their top reader programs. These are children that have read books on a list that's provided by each school geared towards their grade anywhere from kindergarten up to sixth, seventh grade. And these children take a computerized test to make sure they understand what they've read and they have to score over 85%.

So, in the past years we've had an ice cream party for about over 100 children for each school. So I am anticipating that we'll have between 80 and 100 again these next two days. It's a lot of fun with the ice cream and they really enjoy it. Our Drug Awareness Chairman Janet also comes with me and we distribute a lot of the drug awareness coloring book and book markers and just try to encourage them to stay in school and do better.

On Thursday we'll be having an in-house spaghetti dinner. This is to raise money for our Flower Festival Queen Candidate. As you know, our Flower Festival is held at the end of June. And on Friday I have a large event that I do at the Boys and Girls Club on Ocean Avenue. We serve about 300 hot dogs Punch and about 10 pounds of popcorn, which is a lot of roughage.

So I'm excited to say that our featured guest will be the Vandenberg Air Force Base Fire Department. They'll be bringing their smokehouse and the smokehouse is a trailer it's two stories and inside is designed just like a home. The children watch a short video and then they funnel through the home starting in the living room going through the kitchen all the way upstairs to feel what a hot door feels like And as this is happening, the house is starting to fill with a fake smoke so that they understand what it feels like. And we have a lot of interesting reactions and it's just a good practice for them to understand what to do and how to get out and what to do after they get out by calling 911.

Saturday night I will also host a kids' night in our lodge. It's for any child associated with the Elks And basically it's a dinner and a movie. They mostly have opted for pizza, which is good because my cooking skills are not that great. So it's just a fun night. The parents can come in and relax. Their children are safe. And we just try to promote safety within our lodge as well.

Throughout the year, we host several large events, a soccer shoot, hoop shoot. Our dictionary program, which we distribute between eight and 900 dictionaries per year to all the third graders in the Lompoc Valley, in the private school, and those, all the schools. Anyone that has a third grade. And these are dictionaries that they keep for their lifetime of education.

And so we're just happy that we're part of the community and you know, that you support us as well. So our lodge is dedicated to serving the youth and in the future of our community as well. So thank you very much.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role46:22 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Thank you. Quite a list of accomplishments. All right, and so with that we have completed our administrative agenda I think we'll go right into our departmental agenda and have our first item and then we'll take a short break.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:41 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Madam Chair members the board Item number one is from the County Executive Office it's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance adopting at 2% retirement cost of living increase for employees hired on or after June 25 2012. CEO Weller?

0:47 – 0:4913 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed47:00 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Thank you, Chairwoman. I have with me today our Director of Personnel, Jerry Mooth and our Labor Relations Guru, I would say, Bob McLeod, and they'll describe this information to you. So Jerry please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed47:14 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board Before you today is the second of three items that are necessary in order to implement a new reduced retirement tier for non-safety employees hired on or after June 25th of this year. Today you're being asked to first of all consider a change to the ordinance that would reduce the retiree cost-of-living adjustment from 3% to 2%, and then secondly, to set a hearing for next Tuesday May 15th at which time you'll be asked to take the final steps necessary to implement this new tier.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:56 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed47:56 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Chairwoman, I just wanted to add to that this is certainly in my mind something that your board should congratulate themselves on it's been quite a challenge and bring all of our general members together To enable us to move forward on this second tier and I'm very pleased to say that as a result of Jerry and Bob's discussions with the unions and your leadership, our county will see substantial savings on retirement and pension costs in the future.

We are extremely hopeful that our continued discussions with our public safety members will also bring forward a retirement tier over the next fiscal year because we believe it is imperative to have the public safety folks on a second retirement tier just as your general members will be so. Again, just thank you for your leadership and thanks to all of our employees for working with us to enable a retirement tier second system.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role48:59 · ≈ 9:48 AM

Thank you. Any comments from the board? Otherwise I guess we'll have a motion for staff's recommendations here.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction49:10 · ≈ 9:49 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:11 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Motion and I think it was a second by Supervisor Carbajal and a third from Supervisor Lavagnino, and so Mr. Allen we'll have a roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:21 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Aye. Mr. Carbajal? Aye. Ms. Wolff?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:26 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:27 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Ms. Gray?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:27 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:28 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Miss Farr?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:28 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Aye All right thank you the board's going to take a break for about 10 minutes then we'll come back with our departmental agenda item number two Item number two, Mr. Allen would you read that into the record please?

0:49 – 1:0521 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:49 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Item number two is from the County Executive Office it's a hearing to receive and file the quarterly AB 109 impact reports for January 2012 through March 2012 and performance measure definitions.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role50:00 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Good morning Mr. Bozanich are you going to lead off here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed50:04 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisors good morning. Staff is here to present a brief overview of the process and progress being made to implement Public Safety Realignment or AB 109. With me today is Probation Chief Beverly Taylor and Lieutenant Charles Powell from the Sheriff's Department Just a little bit of brief background, public safety realignment began in October 2011 and so by the statistics you're going to see today carry us through March of 2012. So the first two quarters operationally of AB 109.

Keep in mind that the overall goal of public safety realignment is to reduce the state prison population and provide local services that reduce crime into the future. Your board has been provided with a series of monthly status reports based on the statistics gathered by both our probation staff as well as our Sheriff's Department custody staff, and as well as fiscal data and some trend analysis as well.

It's important to note that there is an ongoing collaborative effort between all the partners in, that have a stake in the success of realignment. Being probation, the Sheriff's Department, mental health as well as the county fiscal situation as well so those are ongoing collaborative efforts continue through time. At this point I'd like to turn it over to Chief Taylor for review of some of the additional information.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated51:35 · ≈ 9:51 AM

Chair of Foreign Supervisors, Beverly Taylor, Chief Probation Officer. AB 109 or public safety realignment brings the most significant changes to state corrections and the criminal justice system in over 30 years. On October 1st, 2011 most non-violent, non-serious, non sex offenders were transferred from state to local jurisdictions. The first six months has resulted in considerable increase in workload due to this shift of responsibility requiring a change to how business is done From minor changes to forms, to significant operational processes and a new sentencing structure.

Impacts affect the jail, probation, the courts, the public defender and the district attorney. Countywide stakeholders have risen to meet the challenge of realignment and are working collaboratively toward common goals. Including ADMHS, Social Services and Public Health who are active participants in developing a more effective and efficient delivery of services.

With this level of partnership we will be successful in the long journey of implementing public safety realignment so long as adequate funding continues. The first population is the post-release community supervision offenders. The nonviolent, nonserious non-high risk sex offenders who were released to prison as of October 1. Prior to October 1, they would have been released to state parole after October 1, they're now under the county's jurisdiction. They're not a new population nor were they released early from prison.

Since October, the actual number of those under the post release community supervision is 25% greater than we had projected. This increase is largely due to the fact that the state did not figure in a population of state parolees who were in prison prior to October one on a technical violation who were released after November one then came to the county's jurisdiction.

Probation's response to this increased population was to shift staffing resources to adequately provide the coverage needed. The profile of these individuals We have approximately 227 as of March 31st. 88% were male, 12% were female. The two highest categories of their convictions coming back into the community, 40% were drug related 33% were a property crime.

In the last six months, probation has incarcerated, FLAS incarcerated so that's up to 10 days incarceration. 83 occurrences of FLASH incarceration that would have been up to ten days in custody and this represents 57 unique individuals for a total of approximately 830 days if they receive the maximum ten days We've had four revocations to date. That means that four of those offenders went through the court process, so not yet a huge impact on the courts relative to the violation process.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role55:07 · ≈ 9:55 AM

Supervisor Gray you have a question?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed55:09 · ≈ 9:55 AM

I'm stumbling with this. I really don't understand Who we're talking about, what is this? I'm sorry my mic's not on. These are folks who are being released, and then you had some dates in there about why there are more than you thought there would be. So... Okay. So they've served their time in the state prison? Correct. And now they're coming back on what we would normally call parole but now they're being paroled to probation. Correct. And you said something about that there's 25% more than you had thought there would be and that's because...

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated55:52 · ≈ 9:55 AM

So in large part due to A group of offenders who were on state parole already in the community, they violated parole. They went back to prison prior to October 1 for a technical violation. When they come back into the community after November 1st if they fit the nonviolent, nonserious, non-high risk sex offender they came back to county jurisdiction instead of going back to their parole officer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed56:19 · ≈ 9:56 AM

And that population was missed in the counting and the projections? In the projections, correct. Okay because we were able to project who was coming out basically on release but not the ones that had been re-sentenced and put back into the prison system. Correct. And now we've

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated56:36 · ≈ 9:56 AM

got them back. Right and they were on in the community they had a technical violation so not a new criminal offense but a technical violation they went back to prison prior to October 1 and then those that were released after November 1st instead of going back to state parole supervision they came to probation. And 40% were drugged? So, of our total population the two highest so 73 percent of our offenders forty percent were for a drug offense, so they're committing an offense to prison.

And so it would have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed57:13 · ≈ 9:57 AM

to be

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated57:13 · ≈ 9:57 AM

at the level of sales in order to go to prison? Correct. So it was a felony offense and 33% of them were property offense. Example of a property offense? So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed57:23 · ≈ 9:57 AM

burglary. Okay. But not like armed robbery just... Correct. Thank you. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed57:33 · ≈ 9:57 AM

you Chair. Thank you, Supervisor Wolf. Thank you Madam Chair. Thank you Chief Taylor. What I'd like to ask you, can you clarify the four revocations? What does that actually mean? Does that mean they go back to state prison?

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated57:50 · ≈ 9:57 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisor Wolf. So the four revocations they are individuals who have a violation of their terms and conditions of parole county parole and we have probably already served a flash incarceration of up to 10 days So now we're looking at something more than 10 days in county jail and in order to accomplish that they have a right to go before, to have a hearing before the court. We've had more than four of those where we've had our probation staff work with the public defender and the public defender has gone to the jail talked with the inmate signed a waiver and agreed to 30 days, 45 days in county jail and didn't have to go through the court process. But there were four that for whatever reason they did not want to waive their hearing so went through the actual court process with a district attorney, their defense attorney and the court in probation And the outcome is up to 180 days in county jail.

They would not go back to prison unless they committed a new criminal offense, were convicted on it and it was an offense that they could go to prison on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed59:05 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Okay all right thank you for explaining that. And then the flash incarceration if I understand this AB 109 is that something that is now available to probation? That wasn't available before as a consequence?

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated59:21 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Correct. And it's also currently available for state parole, as well. Right. It is for probation. It's for the post-release community supervision offenders currently. Okay. All right. Thank you. You're welcome.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction59:36 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Madam Chair?

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated59:37 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Yes.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction59:39 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Thank you. I saw this report and by the way it's really well done There's a financial piece that goes with the various parts of this report and various departments. But cumulatively, I'm not sure that I was able to get the perspective of what does all this mean financially? Do we have the resources? We were allocated a certain amount of money from the state.

What does this mean? More means more money. More means less money, but more burn on county government. What does all this mean in terms of having higher numbers of inmates in our system than was projected in terms of resources? I didn't see any analysis in that, any snapshot and if you could give me that, I would greatly appreciate it because at the end There's two concerns that I've always had with is AB 109, and that is the safety for our public and that we have the resources to do it. So if you could help me understand that, I would greatly appreciate it.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:00:54 · ≈ 10:00 AM

Thank you Supervisor Carbajal. And I actually had a question along the same line Chief Taylor. In the, on page two of the staff report it says that spending a budgeted AB 109 funds has been slower than expected which seems kind of counterintuitive if we've had more people that we've had to handle. And then when I look at this month-by-month report and I come to the last page for March, I think now I'm understanding it correctly and the amounts in some of the categories have hardly been spent at all And I'm looking particularly at the collaborative efforts and the mental health housing and drug treatment services. So, um, I, I think we need a lot of explanation in this area.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:01:40 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Okay. Um, chair for supervisor Carbajal, um, the spending, uh, has been Not to where we had anticipated. Part of the reason is in our jail budget line item, there has been a delay in hiring. Unlike probation, the sheriff didn't have staff in the wings that they could bring on for their jail so they've had to recruit in collaboration with county HR and that just has taken...

It's a process. So that's the one piece on jail What we did to take care of the supervision piece for the PRCSs, with the increase of the PRCSs later in the presentation I was going to talk about or I'm going to talk about the second population that we have. The non-violent, non-serious, non sex offenders who now serve their time locally and don't go to prison. We've not had...that's a 20% less than we had anticipated. What we were able to do on probation side for the case management is shift those resources to be able to provide the level of supervision needed for the increase on the post-release, that the back end coming back into the community.

For the treatment services, we have had difficulty recruiting sober living, for example We have standards within the county that not all of our sober living vendors wanted to contract with us. And part of the reason is they are already at capacity, so they didn't need to contract with probation. It took us between 30 and 90 days to set up our contracts, but currently we do have a stalwart we are in contract with in Santa Barbara. We have contracts with Good Sam for both Lompoc and Santa Maria.

We are also working with another CBO in Lompoc who is wanting to open up a sober living home. But that is certainly an area that is going to need continued Work with our staff and collaborations from community organizations. We want to be a part of the housing for homeless coalition because that's a group that we want to tap into their expertise as well. Mental health, We have been working continuously with mental health. We set up a plan with their cares, both in North and South Santa Barbara and Santa Maria. We recognized early on that wasn't going to fit the bill for us so we have in plan and place a contract To have a psychiatrist and a psych tech that's going to be dedicated to this population. We're hoping to have that in place within the next two to three weeks so the first six months was certainly a learning for us.

And I believe that we are getting to a better place where services are going to be delivered more effectively, more efficiently for this population. Substance abuse is huge. One of the other changes that we've made recognizing the hiring with the sheriff because we were going with the sheriff's treatment program provider and we're recognizing that we could probably do that more inexpensively with similar services through our CBO. So that is, we will be meeting with the Alcohol Drug Advisory Group to put out the request for services for them. So we have done a lot of learning over the last six months which is helping us I believe to have a better plan in place as we go forward. We also recognize that with the post-release community supervision, we were anticipating about a 17% homeless need Well, it's as high as 25%.

So that is an area that again we are is one of our key projects that we are going to be looking at as we go forward. Yeah. So,

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:05 – 1:1211 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:05:57 · ≈ 10:05 AM

okay. Well thank you Chief Taylor. I think we'll just go ahead and have you go on with the presentation but um, you know, I may want to circle back to this at the end to at least get some of your ideas for projections in these five different categories that you have here at the end. All right. Please proceed. Thank you.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:06:14 · ≈ 10:06 AM

We can move on to the next population which is the front end The court has two options for these individuals. The court can sentence them

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:06:46 · ≈ 10:06 AM

The reason I want to ask this question is we never talk in this long of sentences, so somebody's going to come up with an acronym for that at some time, someplace. So give it to me now.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:06:56 · ≈ 10:06 AM

NX3s.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:06:58 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Nx3s? Nx

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:06:59 · ≈ 10:06 AM

3s,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:06:59 · ≈ 10:06 AM

the

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:07:00 · ≈ 10:07 AM

non-violent, non-serious, non sex offenders.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:07:03 · ≈ 10:07 AM

So the Nx threes are the folks that normally would have been sentenced to state prison but now we're keeping them here in jail. Exactly. Got it. N x 3s thank you.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:07:14 · ≈ 10:07 AM

So the court has two options for sentencing these NX3 offenders. They can sentence them to a straight custody time in the jail or they could sentence them to a post-sentence supervision, a mandatory supervision which includes some portion of their sentence in custody and the remaining portion on mandatory supervision Since October, the number of NX three offenders sentenced under realignment has been 20% lower than our projections. However, the number ordered to custody has been greater of the 106 and X threes who were sentenced in the first six months, 25 of them were sentenced to a split sentence or post-sentenced supervision.

The low split sentence or PSS, post-sentence supervision numbers are in part due to a justice system that is becoming familiar with the new sentencing structure of realignment and an awareness of the community alternatives that are available. All parties within the court system, the DA, the public defender, the courts probation all agree that a split sentence is preferred and we continue to process this change.

And we've already seen an increase in the number of the mandatory supervision and custody sentences in the last 30 days. In October there were 20 NX3s sentenced to custody only In March, there were 18. Half of them were custody only and the other half were the custody plus the mandatory supervision so we are seeing a change with the courts and again it's a system change that just takes awhile to get everything all the parties familiar with.

And this just shows the, um, numbers of PRCS is post release community supervision population of 227 and it shows the number of, um. Post a sentence supervision offenders have approximately 25 that are currently under probation supervision

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:09:43 · ≈ 10:09 AM

Chair for our supervisors, I'm Lieutenant Charles Powell with the Sheriff's Office. This next slide talks about our incarceration trends. One of the things that we've noticed is that originally we were projected in the first year to roughly have 125, that would be our average daily population of AB 109 offenders in our facilities. The reality is that we're 50% over that already. We're at 189.

The impact of that is seen throughout our facilities and services that we're trying to provide. It's very difficult to maintain those services. Again, echoing what Chief Taylor said, one of the things that we've been dealing with are the straight sentences which really limits our opportunities to provide alternatives to that sentence. The split sentences allow us to develop a plan with probation To take these inmates, transition them to an electronic monitoring program with a component of education and resources through the PRCS to provide them the opportunities to succeed out in the community.

Obviously, the straight sentences are longer jail times. That's what is increasing our population trends, and that's exactly what we're seeing. Our average daily population in the jail is increasing dramatically. And we're really struggling with how to deal with that type of population. Again, to echo what Chief Taylor said. One of the things that we've done is we've started discussions with all the parties involved to discuss the split sentences. What can we do to increase that as a tool for the courts and allow us to help manage our population?

Um, when we talk about managing our population, we also talk about alternative sentencing in our alternate sentencing unit. Our GPS or electronic monitoring component has seen an increase of 70% from where we were last year. So we have 70% more population on our electronic monitoring program Then we have 15 of those are our AB 109 inmates that we're dealing with. We're attempting to get more of them out and deal with that, but as you can tell, we're really limited based upon the sentencing structure that we're currently seeing.

One of the things that we've also done to address the population is look at our main jail housing configuration. Our classification unit does a tremendous job in trying to figure out where our needs are and adjust our population and move change housing units accordingly to provide adequate space for all the inmates that we have. But again, it's very difficult juggling act in order to accomplish that.

1:12 – 1:1810 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:12:16 · ≈ 10:12 AM

I have just one question on, on the sentencing supervisor. So if you have an NX three who's um, who's been sentenced into custody. Does the sheriff have the, um, I was thought that there was a, a, um coordinated group who would evaluate, uh, the individual to see if, if that was the possibility that they could be put on electronic monitoring and it was up to the, to the sheriff to make that decision is at, is that accurate or not?

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:12:55 · ≈ 10:12 AM

Supervisor Wolf, yes that is accurate. What we do is we have a probation component within our custody facility that goes out and does assessments on the inmates that we currently have in our facilities. They provide that information to us and we use their assessment tool to determine who was eligible for early release and or electronic monitoring. We've worked very closely with probation to provide that. The staff that we have, the DPO assessor that we do currently use They've screened approximately 270 inmates in four months to provide us that information to help us make those decisions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:13:27 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Okay, so then let's go back to the numbers and how many then are slated for early release or electronic monitoring? I thought you said 17%.

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:13:38 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Well our electronic monitoring program has seen a 70% increase in their population based upon last year's at this time last year So what we're trying to do is not only work with probation, but state parole to identify these inmates early on in the process and then either provide services through the split sentence component or services through the day reporting centers operated by the state and the sheriff's office. Those are what we're trying to do is target figure out who we need to get to and then start a plan for them to get them out as early as we possibly can in order to provide those services.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:14:12 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Okay. And so you're in the process of doing that right now, even though the assessment is taking place with the 270. But the actual planning on what to do with these inmates is not really fine-tuned yet? Is that what I'm hearing?

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:14:29 · ≈ 10:14 AM

We are working on it. Actually, it's gotten quite a bit better. The assessor that is in our facility has done a really tremendous job in identifying those resources and specifically targeting those inmates that we need to get out and move those people into. We're starting that with the day reporting centers right now. We have day reporting center staff coming in, going in and interviewing inmates to determine what they would be eligible for and what services they need. So I think that component will catch up as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:14:56 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Okay. And just, just in closing on this section I um you know as you said Chief, Chief um I want to call you Chief Stewart, Chief Taylor. Um the you know we are at the beginning stages of really a shift in thinking and the criminal justice system and um and I think in our last meeting some folks had talked about a paradigm shift of what's happening in our jails And this actually to me seems like the beginning stage of that paradigm shift, which is to evaluate these certain folks who might best benefit from rather than being incarcerated to getting treatment. And that it's not just willy-nilly deciding who those people are but it is a very rigorous assessment tool to make sure that those people who come out and get services are the right people To the extent that you can ever get it right.

But, and also I think it goes back to the questions that were raised by Supervisor Farr in Carbajal and that is at other end is making sure those services are available. So I think hearing this whole conversation we understand You know, what pieces are in place but what still needs to be done. And I think for me personally, I feel confident that you are all on the same page. You've been working on this for so long and that in my mind, I think we've already seen some positive results especially when you talk about the PRCSs and the number of people that are not going back into jail.

You know, I think this is good to get our first picture of this. And I'm expecting that as we move forward we're going to see some real positive benefits of this.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:16:52 · ≈ 10:16 AM

Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:16:52 · ≈ 10:16 AM

Gray? Thank you. You talked about managing the population in the jails and changing housing units in the jails, what would you describe? What are the housing units so that we're all learning up here, you know, you all speak the language and we're like whoa.

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:17:10 · ≈ 10:17 AM

I apologize Supervisor Grant one of the things that our jail classification unit does is when the inmates come in our facilities they have to be classified to see where they best fit in our facility and it's based on a number of factors Criminal history, sophistication. There also might be issues with the protective custody need. So what they do is they chart the population trends. Where are we seeing a higher population going into? Whether it's protective custody, whether it's general population meaning different levels of general population there may be some higher security risks. So what they attempt to do is look at our overall facility makeup and then shift that population Move inmates as best they possibly can to eliminate floor sleepers, alleviate tension in the facility.

Getting these people where they need to be and where they're also safe. So it's a daily ongoing task that they take on and they do a tremendous job but it does require a lot of effort. There's intensive interviews that have to go on. They have to look at who's compatible with who? Who can actually live in a housing unit or a cell together so they get along so we alleviate some of those safety concerns.

1:18 – 1:3329 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:18:21 · ≈ 10:18 AM

And how does the Santa Maria Jail fit into this or not?

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:18:26 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Well, right now our Santa Maria jail is just a booking facility. So we don't house inmates up there right now at this particular moment in time. That is something that we will have to address a little bit later but right now it's just a booking facility.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:18:38 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Okay so are you looking at that facility even on a short-term basis as a way to alleviate what's happening in the main jail?

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:18:47 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Yes we are. Okay,

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:18:48 · ≈ 10:18 AM

thank you.

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:18:50 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Madam Chair?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:18:51 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:18:52 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Gray? What if they're sentenced? I mean there are some folks that are waiting sentencing. Are they housed with the whole population or based on how well they get along with people who don't or need to be protected or the categories you gave me?

GuestLieutenant Charles PowellSheriffProposedself-stated1:19:09 · ≈ 10:19 AM

We have sentenced inmates that are housed with unsentenced inmates. I see.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:19:13 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Thank you.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:19:16 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Chair Farr, I'd like to have Sheriff Bill Brown would like to say a few words.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:19:22 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Morning Sheriff.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction1:19:23 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Madam Chair before Mr. Brown goes.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:19:25 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Yes Supervisor Carbajal?

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction1:19:28 · ≈ 10:19 AM

Thank you. You know I like I said earlier I think this report is really well done. I would appreciate it if in the future we could in addition to the operations report get a component that talks about the implementation areas that we are still working on. I think some of those have been raised, contracts with CBOs and I think it just gives us a sense of some of those areas that continue to be challenging to put in place in the operations which ones are being addressed sooner rather than later and it just kind...it just gives us a better picture of how this entire program is coming coming in place, and it also allows us to present to the public how we're faring in terms of our progress of implementing this overall program. So I would just encourage the individuals who put the report together to include a component that also highlights the ongoing challenges or things that we continue to work on that haven't been achieved because it allows us to kind of have some timelines As well as when we hope to have them in place.

And it's always good to give us that perspective.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:20:51 · ≈ 10:20 AM

Thank you. Sheriff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:20:53 · ≈ 10:20 AM

Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board. I'd just like to have a few comments here to sort of clarify a few things for you and give you a little bit of a picture of some of the general challenges that we're having with the jail and our population in terms of the impact of AB 109. We are, as you've heard making every effort to try to make AB 109 as successful as possible and we're seeing some very encouraging results. And I certainly am committed in the Sheriff's Office is committed to making this a successful transition. However that's not to say that we're not doing so on an operating under some very challenging circumstances.

Our jail remains significantly inadequate for our own county population let alone for the additional Inmates whose responsibility we have now taken on as a result of AB 109. Just to give you an indication, our daily population today is 938 people that are in custody in our jail system. The rated capacity of our jail is 788 so we're operating at 119% of capacity and that's not unusual.

consistently operated about 120% of capacity. Ideally, we should be operating at about 85% of capacity in order to move the right people around throughout the jail and have the right population blend in various areas of the jail to limit assaults, to limit fights, to limit problems, to get people to receive proper programming and so forth but we are hamstrung because we're dealing with the crowding situation that we have inherited and have had for the last 30 years, as you've heard ad nauseum.

What we are seeing is an increase in the early releases that were having to make from jail as a result of having to retain people under AB 109 for significantly longer periods of time than we did before AB 109 Just to give you an indication, year-to-date we have early released 266 people from our jail. Last year at this time we had released 220 and last year we actually had a kind of an anomaly. We had a much lower number of early releases than we had in a number of years and we attribute that in large part to a combination of better policing methods the fact that our reentry programming we think is kicking in our recidivism rates are going down slightly And so forth, but nevertheless we're still pushing people out of our jail before they have completed their sentences.

And the electronic monitoring I wanted to make it very clear that the impact on EM is not just the AB 109 and in fact what happens is with the AB 109 prisoners we end up getting people that we really cannot release they have to be kept in custody which means that more people in the other areas in local custody, for example on misdemeanor charges. They're the ones that get pushed out and we're rapidly getting to the point where we're running out of people who are really good risks or good bets to push out early as you've heard. We use the compass methodology and we have a evidence based scoring system to determine what someone's propensity is to re-offend and we only release the lowest of the people who are eligible for release. There are some people that we just feel we cannot release as a result of that, but we're rapidly getting to the point where we're running out of room.

I wanted to clarify two other things. One is the Santa Maria Jail came up. The Santa Maria Branch Jail only has 20 beds in it that can be considered long-term use beds. So even if we are and we are not currently staffed fully in that facility, it only adds 20 beds to our overall jail population for long term inmates. The remaining beds are utilized The booking process and the people are constantly coming and going. But that 20 bed resource is not available to us currently because we don't have enough custody deputies on staff right now to open that facility up. We are currently budgeted in this budget, uh, to have that facility open as a result of some, money that were given to us and as a result of the DSA concessions. But the reality is because of the lag factor that we've had, because of the significant number of custody deputy vacancies, we have not been able to fill those positions in time to be able to get them filled and the likelihood is in going into our next budget as we're going discussing next month during the budget hearings, the likelihood is we will not be able to open that facility any more than it is now seven nights a week without some additional revenue based on the target numbers that we have been given.

The recruitment difficulties I want to just give you a flavor for those as well. They really many of them are an artifact of the budget cuts that we've had over the years particularly the last one in the 2011-12 We had 23 positions that we were recruiting for at the end of that budget. They came about as a result of restorations that you provided and these DSA concessions that I mentioned, and we have stood up some significant recruiting programs to get people.

But to give you an idea of how difficult it is and how long it takes to get people, we ran a recruitment and received over 500 applications for people to apply for and be hired as custody deputies. To date, we've only been able to hire 13 off of that list and the likelihood is we're only going to get another five or six before that list will be expired and we have to go to another. We've done another recruitment process. We have another 600 or so that have applied. We also have about 50 lateral custody deputy applicants from the state system But by the time we do the background investigations and call through this large of a group of people, as I say, we're lucky to get three or four percent of the people that actually apply finally ready for hire.

And once we do get them hired it's a lengthy process. They go through the hiring process which is lengthy in and of itself. Physical agility test. Written tests, interview, psychological test, medical and so forth. So we lose a lot of people along the way when we do finally get them hired they have to go through a custody academy of 10 weeks. So really the reality is that we don't have someone who's up and running and able to function on their own as a custody deputy for upwards of six months to a year depending on what time they come in on that cycle So it's a very difficult situation. And in addition to the 23 vacancies that we were recruiting to fill during the time since January, we've had 15 other custody deputies who have departed either retirements or I've gotten hired and other agencies in peace officer positions or what have you.

So we have this constant pressure that's being put on us to try to fill these positions. And it, uh, I just want you to have an idea and an understanding of the difficulty that my staff has in trying to get enough people for that position.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:28:26 · ≈ 10:28 AM

Thank you. Sheriff supervisor loving, you know? Thank you madam chair

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.711:28:28 · ≈ 10:28 AM

sheriff. Maybe there's the two questions I had one is, and I don't know anything about this other than what I read in the paper. But um, and no, you know, going from state to the County might be difficult, but I saw that CMC was laying off a couple hundred custody deputies would, I mean are they, Applying or how is that working with the shift moving down to the county?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:28:49 · ≈ 10:28 AM

Supervisor Lavagnino, we've actually done a targeted recruitment to try to recruit people from the state CDCR who are being laid off as you say in large numbers as result of the AB 109 shift. We did a specific letter to them and we've had an overwhelming response and we have at least 50 applicants currently that are currently employed custody staff who have applied with our facility. So we're engaged in that process as well, but again it also is a lengthy process. Many of these correction officers for the state have worked in four or five different prisons throughout the state and we have to send background investigators to four or five different prisons to review performance evaluations and personnel records and so forth. So it's a daunting task to get this many people hired in a short period

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.711:29:42 · ≈ 10:29 AM

One last thing is I guess this would be a good time to talk about maybe the status of where we are with funding for our new jail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:29:51 · ≈ 10:29 AM

Well as you know, I'm still very actively seeking the remaining 20 million dollars of the 80 that we asked for for funding that jail in large part. Every indication is very positive at this point that we are on our way to getting it. We have a piece of legislation which has been drafted and will be put forward, and I'm not sure if it's going to be put forward as a standalone bill or as a trailer bill. It's very likely that could be a trailer bill attached to the state budget but basically it has our county as well as Kern County in San Benito County As three counties which relinquished monies under the AB 900 Phase 1, and it's the legislation would direct that money to go back into phase 2. And as I've indicated to you all beforehand, the CSA board, the Correctional Standards Authority Board is on record as indicating their intent to give the remainder of that $20 million to us in an award if and when the state pushes that money back.

So I hope that by sometime, uh, perhaps in the middle of June we'll have some information shortly thereafter. I'll be able to come back with you with a more comprehensive picture on how we can proceed to build this jail that we, we still need very greatly.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:31:10 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Thank you. Thank you Sheriff. Okay. Uh, chief Taylor?

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:31:16 · ≈ 10:31 AM

All right. Just in closing, we've talked a bit about the spending trends and at length about why we not expended our funds as quickly as anticipated, the higher end delays and negotiations and requirements of contracts. But our response will be we're going to continue to collaborate with our partner agencies Over the last six months, we've learned some things about our contracting process that we have streamlined that process.

And as the Sheriff noted they continue to work with County HR to get their staff hired as quickly as possible.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:31:56 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Thank you. Actually Chief Taylor again let me just go back to this page which is the most recent page that you've given us And so we have this planned column in these five different areas, and I'm assuming that was the total amount of money that we had for this fiscal year. actually been spent this month and then the net is what's left to spend in those different categories. Am I understanding that

CommentTerri HetzelProposedself-stated1:32:28 · ≈ 10:32 AM

correctly?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:32:29 · ≈ 10:32 AM

That's

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:32:29 · ≈ 10:32 AM

correct for the top two lines so you've got your plan for the month, actual spent for the month and net for the month and then the two columns right below that under jail custody is what the fiscal year planned was, what's been spent year-to-date and what's left in that category year-to date as well

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:32:49 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Okay. So it looks like in looking at the fiscal year, what's left in these categories and all of the categories is a whole lot of money that's still left to be spent. And in the last two, the collaborative efforts and the mental health housing and drug treatment services is just almost all of it. Um, so this was as of the end of March I realized we're already into May.

So are we on track now because of what you said earlier, there was a big kind of long delay in a lot of different areas. Is this money going to be spent by the end of the fiscal year? No. So then what happens to this money?

1:33 – 1:4016 turns

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:33:30 · ≈ 10:33 AM

Okay so we have met with our community corrections partnership and we're gonna be coming before the board on May 22nd with our plan for fiscal year 12-13 and the money that is left from this fiscal year was rolled over to 13-14 The work group that was identified by the CCP got together with all of our stakeholders and have come up with a plan on how to spend the money. We currently don't have our 13-14 allocation, what the state told us to conservatively plan for doubling what we received last year.

And so we did that along with the rollover that we have from this year and we have built our spending plan based on that.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:34:17 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Okay, but we have some indication or do we not have any indication yet what the budget in Sacramento is going to be like? I mean generally May is when there's a revision so we should start having some idea.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:34:29 · ≈ 10:34 AM

We are hoping by May 14th, 15th to have what our allocation would be. We've been told that in the Governor's May revise the county's allocations will be identified

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:34:42 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Okay but do you have any indication yet whether this double from last year is actually going to be what's in

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:34:48 · ≈ 10:34 AM

there? We believe, yes we believe they told us conservatively you can count on the doubling of last years which would take us to approximately 7.6 million dollars for 12-13 and we are anticipating that it would be more than that but we just we don't know what that enhancement above that would be

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:35:06 · ≈ 10:35 AM

Okay so if you add the rollover from this fiscal year it's to what the numbers that you think you're going to get in another week or two then the coordinating group is going to be looking at a total plan for how all that money is going to be spent in these various categories throughout then the coming fiscal year? Chair Farr, that is correct.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:35:28 · ≈ 10:35 AM

And we have a spending plan that we've identified and are ready to bring before the board, but we recognize we may have to depending on what the May revise indicates. That we may have to take that back before the CCP and rework our spending plan because again we worked on with the best information that we had

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:35:50 · ≈ 10:35 AM

Okay. And then I just, you know had one more comment and then I know that there's other members of the board that do but when this item first came before us I actually questioned the number of people that might end up homeless because I think my comment was well you know they may think that they're going to come back and live with family but have you actually you need to have equivalent numbers from the family So now you say it's gone from 17 to 25% so far, and I do hope that you are a part or gonna be a part of the various collaborative efforts that have to do with the homeless. And I know specifically we have something coming up about the homeless veterans but it's so important that all of this effort meld in with what's already going on because there's already so many gaps not only with housing But with the areas that you have identified for substance abuse, for the need for more detox beds and all of that.

So just as this situation is exacerbating the issues with overcrowding in the jail, for example, it's exacerbating the existing issues that we already had in this area. And the funds that are available to you for these efforts need to be folded into this greater effort that's going on for the whole community so I hope that will be happening.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:37:07 · ≈ 10:37 AM

And Chair Farr, I met yesterday in our interagency policy council which includes DSS, public health, ADMHS and that was our topic of discussion was the collaborative homeless meeting and we certainly will be participating in that.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:37:23 · ≈ 10:37 AM

Great thank you. Supervisor Wolff? Your light's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:37:26 · ≈ 10:37 AM

on. Yeah thank you Chair Farr. I do sit on the CCP committee. I'm not a voting member so I was at the meeting when they discussed the budget And I think it was a very spirited and positive debate. So, I look forward to that coming back to the board. There's a lot of work that has gone into it and all of the parties working together to come up with an appropriate budget for next year. So I think the process has been really good. And I think the issue also about homelessness in order for this whole system to work, and I couldn't agree more is that notion that money does need to be allocated for substance abuse, mental health issues, homeless issues because of the population growth and to make sure those needs are being cared for so they don't get into the prison system.

So I think all of the partners working together You know again I just don't want to sound like Pollyanna but we do have a really incredible group of folks in this county who I think understand the issues, understand the evidence based importance Making sure where these people are going. And so I appreciate all the work, as do I'm sure my colleagues on this. I do have a question on the same sheet, the March impact report because I'm not clear and maybe Sheriff Brown or someone from the sheriff's department can explain this to me.

It says number of incarcerated inmates under AB 109 and it says sentenced 110. And of those, 100 are in custody and ten are in alternative sentencing. And then it says the revocations are 171 so the total between the sentence and the revocation is 281. Are all of those revocations AB 109 people? Because I thought that the number of revocations that we heard from Ms. Taylor was four, but that's the PRCSs.

So are you including other groups?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:39:58 · ≈ 10:39 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisor Wolf, the revocation that Chief Taylor was talking about was PRCS revocation. The revocation that you're talking about is the revocations are people who were on state parole who were transferred to probation who then revoked and would have normally they would have come to us anyway for a period of time if they had significant revocal they would have been sent to state prison. So there are two different... Are those

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:40:29 · ≈ 10:40 AM

the AB 109ers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:40:30 · ≈ 10:40 AM

They're all AB 109 related, they're just in two different categories of AB 109.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:40:34 · ≈ 10:40 AM

So if you see the revocation area you'll see probation has 35 and parole has 136 for a total of 171 revocations so two separate categories.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:40:54 · ≈ 10:40 AM

But both under AB 109?

1:40 – 1:4717 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:40:58 · ≈ 10:40 AM

Both under

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:40:58 · ≈ 10:40 AM

AB 109. They're both impacting us as a result of AB

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:41:03 · ≈ 10:41 AM

10 9. So I should assume that the parole numbers, the 136, those are the PRCSs.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:41:13 · ≈ 10:41 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisor Wolff, no, the 35

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:41:16 · ≈ 10:41 AM

No, the 136.

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:41:17 · ≈ 10:41 AM

So the 136 are parole violators who are in custody on a parole revocation? They've had some type of either a technical violation or they may have had a new criminal charge and they're in jail serving that either waiting a hearing or serving a sentence that they've received. I see okay all right thank you

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:41:42 · ≈ 10:41 AM

Thank you. Supervisor, I'm sorry, Supervisor Wolfe is that it? Supervisor Lavagnino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.711:41:47 · ≈ 10:41 AM

Thank you Madam Chair. I took two things out of this one was that and I don't know if anybody's here from the DA's office or is the buy-in there that they're pushing for the split sentence or we're just not the judges aren't seeing that or is it just education or where are we?

CommentBeverly TaylorProposedself-stated1:42:02 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisor Lavagnino. Everybody I believe is on board for recognizing the benefit of a split sentence and it's just it's a new process we are having ongoing meetings and trainings with all of our court partners and the jail in probation So I believe, as we noted even in March where 50% of these sentences were split and the other 50% were straight. Whereas in, as I mentioned in October, we didn't have any split sentence so I believe we are going to see an increase in our split sentence which gives then the jail a greater opportunity and it provides supervision when they get out of custody by probation.

And if they are released early then there's the dual supervision of the sheriff staff as well as probation.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.711:42:50 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Then my second point is, and I'm very confident that we can do a better job. And I think we've already shown that than the state can do and especially with the very capable team that we've got here obviously have a very firm grasp on this. The only thing I'm worried about is the thing I've been worried about from day one and that is ensuring that we have a stream Coming from the state, where are we at? I remember the governor made a promise that originally they were gonna go with a constitutional amendment and maybe it's CEO Waller that can answer this. What assurance do we have that this is going to continue to be funded?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:43:24 · ≈ 10:43 AM

Well the assurance that we have is the governor's commitment to the funding and it is included in the proposal that he's putting on the ballot for this fall. This specific type of funding additionally CSAC and the County Administrators Association press the governor's office and the legislator for permanent fixes to this, not just the commitment. Although we value the commitment of the governor, we want something in writing so to speak.

And what I'm seeing is very positive in that regard. I guess we'll see more in November once the governor's initiative is actually put to a vote at the people

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:44:08 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Thank you.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:44:24 · ≈ 10:44 AM

be aware of what the county administrators statewide say about Santa Barbara County's program. And what they say is that we have one of the best programs in the entire state and a great deal of that is due to the cooperation and the collaborative efforts of the folks that are involved, probation, the sheriff, the DA, the public defender ADMHS, all of those individuals have such a great working relationship in this county that I believe it is the cornerstone of why our programs are so successful and why our programs are so flexible and why our programs are always very innovative. And certainly I think that you should be aware of that respect that you have statewide in this program.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:45:14 · ≈ 10:45 AM

That's certainly wonderful to hear and thank you for telling us that. Okay, why don't we go ahead and I'm going to conclude the presentation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:45:22 · ≈ 10:45 AM

Just a brief wrap-up chair and members of the board so just to summarize some of the key takeaways from our presentation in the discussion this morning hopefully for all of us including the public is that there are up to now some larger than expected number of prisoners from the state prison system that is The higher the expected number of AB 109 sentences is also a critical thing to take away from today. And that the spending thus far has been slower than anticipated, but is accelerating rapidly as we go forward. As both Supervisor Wolf and also as well as Chief Taylor mentioned, the Community Corrections Partnership is going to bring back on May 22nd the 12-13 realignment plan for your consideration and approval. And so we just want to highlight that.

Take away from our conversation this morning was the suggestion that we do some deeper level analysis of the challenges and how do we begin in the future reports like this when we come back next quarter, how do we identify some of those current implementation challenges and what our solutions are for those. So hopefully we can continue to provide for you a statistical basis for what's happening operationally but I think as it was Supervisor Carbajal mentioned What are those challenges that we're facing and how are we facing those going forward? And so just lastly, we would like to ask that you consider and file this report for this quarter.

And we look forward to coming back in July with the third quarter report. That concludes the presentation.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:47:00 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Thank you very much. We'll go ahead and turn to the public now. Mr. Allen, we have public speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:47:06 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board we have four requests to speak in Santa Barbara starting with Dr. Robert Johns to be followed by Sharon Rose

1:47 – 1:534 turns

PresenterSharon Rosecounty's prevention programProposedself-stated1:47:25 · ≈ 10:47 AM

My name is Sharon Rose. I had a 20-year career in managing public health prevention programs in substance abuse. I'm the former interim director of the county's prevention program. I served for two years with Santa Barbara County. In my public health training, we were taught To stop putting band-aids on problems and address root causes. And I want to thank everyone who spoke today because it sounds like they're going in that direction.

For example, when we wanted to reduce lung cancer in California, we didn't create more hospitals. What we did was go after smoking. That's what did it. I am the mother of a bipolar person who suffered PTSD and wound up self-medicating and going to jail and being homeless. I told my story the last time I was here. We would like to see more of the AB 109 money directed toward solving the revolving door crisis in jails, and stop housing mentally ill homeless and AOD users in jail.

We would like to see more of the AB 109 money spent on job training, on social workers, on beds. We really need beds. We need intensive integrated residential treatment. We already heard it's cheaper to provide treatment and supervised housing than jail. My son is a successful electrician now because he had affordable rehab at a church facility that cost our family almost nothing.

We could never have afforded private care. He is now putting two kids through college. He had supportive housing for many months while he got a job and learned to live a sober life. He has a success story. He could just as easily be dead or still caught in the cycle of street and jails. Please find a way to spend more of AB 109 money on prevention and beds.

We have $7 million coming. We will have more public safety when our jails are not housing the mentally ill, the homeless and drug users. When they're housing Dr. Johns is our next speaker to be followed by Meredith McCurdy.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentSharon RoseProposed1:50:38 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Now, this is a good thing. The state's going to keep putting the pressure on this county. This is a good thing because they need to get rid of some of their inmates so the pressures coming down now we need to stay focused. We need to know that mental health is it very crucial issue here and we have to keep remembering And I hate to bring it up, but we've had 50 homeless death and we must keep pushing this collaborative effort. That's a good thing also now there are other issues that are impinging upon us.

But again, this county must stay focused. We also have a new County jail that has to be built And everything will fall into place. Once we build this county jail, we cannot miss that focus. That county jail is important because from that county jail everything will fall into place. Beds, rehabilitation, alcohol drug, Yes, we do have some misdirected types of issues and the sheriff is handling that best as he can.

But as I said before, we've got to stay focused. We've got to stay in the area that mental health is a number one criteria and we cannot get lost in that. Many many groups Many groups want to impinge on and to bring in, but mental health is key issue here. Alcoholism is an issue here. And we can't forget earlier today, we heard about the veterans. And if you think about it very carefully, veterans are almost 40% of the mentally ill in this county could be higher So, I'd like to see us stay focused.

Focused. Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:53:09 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Thank you. Next speaker?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:10 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Meredith McCurdy to be followed by Suzanne Riordan.

1:53 – 1:584 turns

CommentMeredith McCurdyProposedself-stated1:53:16 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Good morning Chair and Supervisors. My name is Meredith McCurdy. I'm with Families Act and I have a son who is in county jail right now and he also is PTSD and bipolar I would like to thank you for hearing our petition on behalf of the nonviolent offenders. It makes sense to remove them from the atmosphere caused by being blended with the element of hardcore perpetrators, from whom they can learn many tricks of the trade and raise their risk of recidivism.

All inmates who spend more than a few days in our jail need a productive occupation Aside from counseling and therapy, those incarcerated need something to do and job training. This would greatly increase their sense of responsibility and self-worth. Being held in jail month after month with no goals or constructive activity would lessen their ability to engage in productive pursuits.

We would hope a goodly portion of the allocated funds will be spent on rehabilitation The feeling of accomplishment resulting from industrious labor would result in a desire to obtain gainful employment upon their release. They would have created their own work ethic and be desirous of having a worthwhile and financially viable function. We strongly recommend a treatment facility to help accomplish their successful return to the community.

We appreciate your attention in this matter, thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:55:04 · ≈ 10:55 AM

Thank you Ms.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:55:04 · ≈ 10:55 AM

McCurdy. Suzanne Riordan to be followed by Deidre Edgar who's our final speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:55:11 · ≈ 10:55 AM

Good morning Chair and Supervisors. I want to say that our group Families Act very much appreciates the opportunity that we've had to meet with Chief Taylor and other members of the Community Corrections Partnership to help to have an input into what can be done with the funds that are coming in from the state. It looks at this point, according to Chief Taylor, that we'll have almost $10 million, a minimum of $10 million coming in to this county from the state to help to turn around the situation that we're facing now.

And I want to address something that Supervisor Gray brought up about the drug offenders that are behind bars in our county and in our state. And I'd like to correct a misperception that you have to have been selling drugs to end up sitting behind bars for a long time, in our county or in our state or in our country. Families Act put out a report called In Search of Solutions to Santa Barbara's Revolving Door And I'm hoping that each one of you will have a chance to look at that report because we've put a lot of work into it.

And it's very, very relevant to this discussion. What it does among other things is document the history behind the overcrowded prisons and jails in California. And what you can see is that people with minor drug possession have ended up being committed to long terms. And I want to illustrate this fact with a personal story. My son, Ian died at 23 years old in Santa Barbara City.

He was incarcerated numerous times simply for possessing a little bit of a drug. On the day that he died, he had been in a period when he was doing really, really well. He had a job with the carpenters union. He had been sober and his self-esteem was coming up. His bipolar condition was under control but that day that he died, he found out that he had a dirty test. His foreman had invited him over to his house on the weekend And they'd had a few beers and one thing had led to another. My son Ian was so demoralized that day, he saw his job, his relationship and his future going down the tubes because he thought he was gonna have to go to prison.

This is what we're doing to some of our young people and it's wrong. The money that's coming into our county from the state is an opportunity to break the revolving door cycle for this kind of a young person. There's been a tremendous injustice committed in our country We didn't start it here. We weren't the source of it, but we're having to deal with the consequences.

We want you to know that to break the cycle, we're going to need a substantial investment in intensive integrated residential treatment beds and in job training. These are some of the essential components we need to see funded by these funds. Thank you.

1:58 – 2:025 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:58:21 · ≈ 10:58 AM

Good morning and thank you. CEO Waller's comments were profound, and I just want to reiterate them the way in which our county is looking at solving the problem and causing a solution rather than a cycle of expense without payoff. Is the fact that we have our public agencies using public dollars to work as a team to use the money for the public safety. And I think that is unique in my experience in this state, it is unique and it's very successful without public departments doing the public's work. We would not be as far as we are today and I commend our county for doing that. I'm heartened and I'm very pleased that we have this kind of cooperation. We can solve any problem when we work together in this regard. The probation department, the sheriff's department, the district attorney and the public defender should be commended for this level of cooperation.

We can get there if we continue on this track. The voters care about how we do this and this is something the voters are watching. As a voter from the Goleta Valley, I want my money to go towards solving problems. We have not done a good job at that with the mentally ill and the drug offenders in our county. We don't lock up people that suffer from Alzheimer's disease. People that have Alzheimer's and the elderly if they drive their car without a license, if they act in odd behaviors in public We never say to the families that call to help them, we'll have them arrested and the courts will deal with them. We don't do that but we do that every day every week for people with mental illness and with drug issues and that doesn't solve the problem incarceration costs a lot and they don't come out Any better for it and in fact usually worse.

We don't we don't arrest, we don't look to the criminal system to fix people that suffer from dementia, to fix people that suffer from mild retardation. These people in our society, the courts these public departments We work together to get them taken care of in a civil way, through civil law and civil procedure. And through the agencies like mental health and public health to fix the problem and get them properly cared for. That's the model that works. That's the model that's humane. And I don't think anyone in our community would disagree with that particular model. But we don't look at people that are 21 suffering from mental illness This is At least they're in a safe place and we'll hope that they find the care that they need. It's not there, so what we need to do is take a step back and think about AB 109 is to get people out of that resolving door.

Let the departments do that and give them the resources to do that. Thank you.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:01:27 · ≈ 11:01 AM

All right, that ends public comment on this item. We'll bring it back to the board any final comments? Supervisor Carbajal here in Santa Barbara any other comments from you before we end this item?

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:01:41 · ≈ 11:01 AM

No I just think that was a good note to end the last public speaker I think summed it up really well giving everybody all the county family lots of credit for going in the right direction but Reminding is there's a lot more to be done. So I just you know with that, I'll make a motion to Receive and file the report

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:02:12 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Aye. Ms. Wirth? Aye. Ms. Gray? Aye. Ms Farr?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:02:15 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Aye, thank you. You know it's my intention hope that we can finish our departmental agenda item before we break for lunch and closed session but let's give staff about three minutes or so to set up for the next item and then... ...to order here and we will take up agenda item number three Mr. Allen

2:02 – 2:103 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:02:39 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board. Item 3 is a hearing to receive and file per the provisions of Government Code Section 29126.2 Fiscal Year 2011-12 Third Quarter Budget and Financial Status Report as of March 31, 2012 showing the status of appropriations and financing for all departmental budgets adopted by the Board.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:02:59 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Thank you. Good morning Mr. Alvarez

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:03:01 · ≈ 11:03 AM

Good morning Chair Farr and members of the board. Today we are presenting the third quarter financial status report, and this presentation as we've noted previously is a combined effort of the CEO's office and the auditor controller. I believe the auditor controller Mr. Geis is in Santa Barbara, and the purpose is to communicate significant financial variances to the board identifying timing versus non-timing differences And when we do come across differences that are non-timing, we want to identify for you what the potential impact is either on the general fund or on a fund balance.

So the presentation consists of an overview which will be this slide and then we'll go into talking about the general fund departments and then we'll be talking about the special revenue and other funds. So attachment A to the board letter shows all the general funds. It's one page and there are several funds on there, and then attachment B would be the special revenue and other funds. So this might be public health, mental health, and so forth, funds that typically have their own funding source rather than a predominantly general fund.

The overview is that the general fund continues to show positive results and at this point, the schedule attachment A is showing a $5.9 million favorable variance for the general fund departments. And this 5.9 is without consideration of the $8.1 million that has already been set aside if you will from concession savings so those monies have already been reflected and so this would be on top of that And then as we get into the special revenue funds, what you'll see is that those are mostly on target.

And so we'll be talking more about those in a little bit but those are primarily tracking to budget with two exceptions being public health and mental health. So this is a little busy on this screen, but you have it in your handouts as well. This is our signal chart and we've used this in the past just to show how visual of how things are trending. The green would be indicating that they're generally tracking two budget if it's yellow with an upward pointing arrow It's materially varying in a positive manner from budget. If it's yellow with a downward arrow, it's materially tracking in a negative fashion and if it's a red box, it would indicate that there is a, that it might end in a year-end deficit or it's projected to end in the year-end deficit.

And so in summary if we look at this, if we'll look at the upper left portion up in here what you'll see is that these are all the general funds. So when we talked about attachment A these are all the general funds that are in attachment A. You'll notice that all of them are green or yellow with a positive variance. So all of these are tracking, they're all tracking positives so that's really good.

As we get to the balance of them what you'll see overall there are 69 funds 54 are green, nine are yellow favorable. There are four that are yellow with a downward pointing arrow, two with a red arrow. So of these 69 departments 63 are favorable or 91.3%. So overall tracking very nicely and we'll talk more about those that have negative trends as we come into the general fund actually will be in the special revenue funds.

So let's go ahead and get into the general funds, and this would be attachment A. And the general fund overall has a positive variance of $5.9 million. And the largest component of that favorable variance is the general revenues. So when we look at the departments within the general fund, there is one department for general revenues and within this there's a positive variance right now of $2.6 million.

The largest element in there Is tax penalties of $954,000. A large portion of that however is thought to be timing differences. I'm sorry the VLF is also in there that's at about $930,000 that will stay. That's a favorable variance that will stay and also TOT that's favorable at this point over $700,000 So those are the major components of the variance, but I would like to also add that the secured property tax and property tax in lieu of VLF which are our largest general revenue components comprising 850, I'm sorry 156 million out of 209 million are on track. So those are tracking right in line and that represents about 75% of these general revenues that we're talking about. So I think last time we didn't mention that and it came up as a question wanted to make sure that everybody knows that we're on track With the general revenues largest components of property tax related items.

The other big component is in the salaries and benefits, and in that area we're showing a positive variance of $2.4 million. And these are largely driven by regular salaries, by holding vacancies and also health insurance costs coming in lower than planned. Those are the major drivers in the $2.4 million for those items and again that excludes concession savings.

If we'll go to the, as we go to the next one. So what we're looking at, the first view we had was major categories, you know, revenue salaries and benefits. This one is really looking at it by the departments of what the major elements of the favorable variances are here by department. And as you can see, um, the largest one is two general revenues that we talked about. Then we have the district attorney at 565,000. Uh, these are all favorable variances Probation at 317, Sheriff at 509, Human Resources, General County Programs and then everything else. So this is detailing out where that $5.9 million is coming from.

As we look at the first three all of these are public safety and the largest element driving these favorable variances is Prop 172 revenues coming in higher than planned Across all departments, Prop 172 revenues are trending favorable by $1.4 million so that's really what's driving this and then in the presentation we heard before for the AB 109 realignment dollars those dollars that will not be spent would not be reflected here those are held by the auditor controller and released as the expenses are incurred so when they talked about rolling those funds forward it's not part of this its separate its in a separate fund Let's see, in human resources the elements here it's 580,000 favorable variants. 169,000 is related to salaries and benefits.

177,000 is related to health clinic services and that's gonna be a timing difference so that won't stay if you will by the end of the year. And then $82,000 is services and supplies. And that's again timing of expenses and the balance is capital related, some timing, some permanent. And the projection from human resources is that they'll end about 200,000 positive for the year once we get all the timing elements adjusted out.

And then lastly we have the general county programs of 633,000. The timing differences are about 300,000 in that so it's projected that this will end about positive little over 300,000 to the good on that one.

2:10 – 2:2028 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:10:48 · ≈ 11:10 AM

Actually, Mr. Alvarez before you leave that one I did want to ask you in the staff report it says that it's due to unanticipated revenue of $300,000 for the Greco settlement which I didn't think was unanticipated and timing variances for the receipt of cell site revenue which I think we would be able to anticipate And then a transfer of general fund contribution of $122,000 for Project Clean Water. Can you explain that one?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:11:21 · ≈ 11:11 AM

So Supervisor Farr, with all of these. So for Greca it was not in the detail of the budget and that's why it is showing as a favorable variance. On the other two they were projected within the budget but they were projected at a different time period so those two would be timing differences. So they were projected, they were budgeted, it's just that they came in prior to the budgeted time period.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:11:45 · ≈ 11:11 AM

OK, but I guess I'm still a little confused about did the general fund contribute $122,000 to Project Clean Water? So is that a minus?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:11:58 · ≈ 11:11 AM

It's showing favorable because it has not occurred yet. But it's my understanding that that is projected to occur before the end of the

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:12:05 · ≈ 11:12 AM

year. And I thought that Project Clean Water had substantial revenue so why are we giving in $122,000?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:12:13 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Supervisor Farr, I would like to...I don't have an answer for you at this point. I'd like to be able to get back to you on that.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:12:19 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Okay. I'm just always kind of confused about this general county programs category and I know that it's been things have been taken out of it that used to be in it but I'm not clear at this point in time exactly what makes up that particular department so perhaps you could bring that back later too. Thank you.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:12:38 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Very good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:12:41 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Can you just go back Mr. Alvarez, Madam Chair? Supervisor Wolff. Thank you. The general county programs that Supervisor Farr just alluded to, is that the library? Does that include the library?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:12:56 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Supervisor Wolff it did include the library I believe that will be moving into Community Services Department for next budget year but in this current year it was in general county programs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:13:06 · ≈ 11:13 AM

So it would be reflected in that number then?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:13:10 · ≈ 11:13 AM

It would be reflected in that department. It did not create a variance, so it would not be on that list.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:13:16 · ≈ 11:13 AM

I got you. OK. And that answers...I was going to ask the other question about why we have parks still separated out but you're going to rectify that in the next budget cycle then? You're gonna combine everything together?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:13:26 · ≈ 11:13 AM

That

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:13:27 · ≈ 11:13 AM

is correct.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:13:32 · ≈ 11:13 AM

This next schedule is a new schedule we've added this time around and we'll get some feedback to see if this is helpful. Previously what we would do, is we would summarize how the funds were doing and then we'd talk about all these timing differences so it was kind of hard to reconcile back to where we think we're gonna end the period. So what we've done here is we've showed that schedule, our attachment A is starting at $5.9 million and then what we're doing here is we're backing out those large timing differences that we talked about. The property tax penalties was one. The sheriff, I apologize on this schedule, this was initially what it was and the sheriff was showing a higher favorable variance. There was an adjustment made and it didn't get pulled off of this schedule so that 490,000 should not be on here So that will actually improve the bottom line to about $4.4 million.

The general county programs, the timing differences there were $242,000 and the timing differences within human resources of 309,000 so we're expecting then as I explained in the adjustment, we're expecting the general fund departments to end positive at this point by $4,400,000.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:14:39 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:14:41 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Mr. Alvarez, in item A6 today We decreased $4.6 million in liability that was booked in ADMHS and we transferred it out of the general fund. Can you tell me where that money is sitting right now or will be sitting after we took that action?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:15:01 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Supervisor Wolf, that is coming back to the general fund so that will increase the general fund. It's not reflected on this. It came to the board today and we do have that as an item that we were going to speak to in our special revenue funds as we talked about mental health.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:15:15 · ≈ 11:15 AM

So would it be fair to say that the general fund that you could potentially add this 4.6 to the 5.9? Actually, it's 4.4. Oh, 4. 6.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:15:31 · ≈ 11:15 AM

I would, yes in theory but I'd make a slight distinction. This is new money coming in the $4.6 million was already set aside in the audit exception reserve so as we look at all of the list of our fund balances and reserves will see that there was money in the audit exception reserve that was anticipated to be transferred to the mental health department That will no longer be necessary, so those monies can move down from one reserve or fund balance in the audit exception and then move down into the strategic reserve for instance. So it's really that would be a moving from one fund balance to another whereas this would be new monies I'll say coming in that could be put into the strategic reserve if that's clear?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:16:10 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Okay, so it's going to go into say strategic reserve and then with ADMHS well, so then that issue of ADMHS deficit Would be addressed during the budget hearings

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:16:24 · ≈ 11:16 AM

supervisor with that. That's correct. I'm sorry, the deficits within mental health. I believe they're coming back towards the end of this month.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:16:32 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Okay.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:16:33 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Thank you. Okay so that's we'll go on to the next one Okay we're now going to look at the special revenue and other funds. These are identified as attachment B in the, to the board letter and with these we find that if you look at attachment A it actually shows a negative of 3.4 million dollars but it includes as the first fund all of the general funds which was positive 5.9 million dollars So if we adjust for that, it would be totaling before timing and other differences. Totaling a negative $9.3 million as we start to look at the special revenue and other funds.

I've grouped the roads and capital funds together. These are identified as funds 15 through 31. The total of all those show us a negative $1.3 million, but with these there's fund balance already set aside to complete these projects so it's just going to be entries to move the money in from fund balance to complete these projects. So while at the 1.3 is part of the 9.3 negative that we're describing, it's really not a permanent or it's not a difference that does not have funding.

So again we're trying to identify things that could impact the general fund and this 1.3 would not be impacting the general fund at all. The next item we're gonna talk about is healthcare or public health and this is Fund 42. In this report it's showing as a $2.6 million negative so that's again part of the $9.3 million we're describing And what's happening here is they've had a, we talked about this previously that they've had a significant transition with their electronic medical health records. And in this transition it's slowed down some of their productivity and reduced their productivity combined with the fact that they're also seeing that there are other Medi-Cal providers particularly in North County that are starting to see some of the clients or some of their actual clients that they're seeing, the number of clients has reduced.

So as of the third quarter, it was reflecting a negative 2.6 million. The public health department believes that about 500,000 of that will be recovered by year end and they're currently indicating that they believe they'll win about 2.1 million negative for the year. A lot of that they believe will be We'll recover in the following year as they get their system down.

But it's hard to tell how much is a client loss versus productivity loss, so that's something that they'll be watching and will be watching and they have already started to plan if it's a permanent situation what can they do about it? And then last point I'd like to make about this is that they do have adequate fund balance to accommodate this or won't be drawn on the general fund at all. They'll use their departmental fund balances for this.

Next is mental health, and we'll be talking here about Fund 44 and Fund 48. And the negative between the two is a total of $12.4 million. And that's comprised of $6 million in timing differences. And Supervisor Wolf, this is where the $4.6 million is, the timing differences. They're short revenue because they haven't had to draw down this money to pay those liabilities. So that will be reversing and going away so that will reduce what started as the $12 million variance. It will reduce it by that 4.6.

So that timing difference- Excuse me. Will become a favorable-

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:19:59 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:20:02 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Thank you Mr. Alvarez, Madam Chair is it okay if we have Dr. Wada come to the podium because I wanted to ask him a question about the health care piece?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:20:11 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Dr. Wada thank you for being here.

2:20 – 2:2615 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:20:15 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Yes thank you Dr. Water for being here and to all the department heads for being here because you never know when we're going to have a question. The healthcare issue and something that Mr. Alvarez brought up about the North County, that there's more Medi-Cal providers. That's always a good thing. We always want that but the flip side is that we also want our county services to provide Medi-Cal services to our community as well.

Can you just describe what are the services that we are now no longer providing in the North County that we did before? Since there are more Medi-Cal providers. That was a reason that was given, that there's more Medi-Cal providers in North County and so Our county is not providing certain services, at least that's what I understood.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:21:13 · ≈ 11:21 AM

So- I'm sorry, Supervisor Wolff? That is not what I intended to communicate. Okay. What we're seeing is fewer clients so we're generating less revenue because clients are being served at new facilities that have opened up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:21:27 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Okay. So we've got the same number of clients, new facilities are opening, they're offering services People are choosing to leave our facilities to go there. So what are the services that we may be seeing in decline? Is it maternal health? I don't know, just give me an idea of what services are being reduced in the county.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:21:53 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Chair Farr, Supervisor Wolf. That is correct. We are seeing less Medi-Cal particularly in North County but throughout our system as other providers more aggressively go after Medi-Cal clients because they're seeing less privately insured patients so for us to operate our health services there's always a delicate balance between our patient mix of uninsured and unreimbursed clients versus Medi Cal patients and so we are seeing a decline In addition to our electronic health records, which has decreased our productivity. So some of these clients have chosen to go to other facilities.

We may be able to draw them back, but in the meantime we do have a plan to address that and we may end up having to sort of right size our operation but it's not an elimination of services, we may just have to scale back some of our services particularly for example in our women's clinic. That's one area that we're looking at But we have not implemented any service reductions at this time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:22:58 · ≈ 11:22 AM

Okay, so that kind of answers my question then. The women's clinic is one of those areas where you're seeing a decline? How about pediatrics?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:23:10 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Wolf, we don't actually offer pediatrics in North County. We have a small what's called the CHDP Clinic but we do not offer, at this point, pediatrics primary care It's something we're actually looking at possibly getting into as a revenue-generating activity. But again, it's something we're assessing currently.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:23:32 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Dr. Watt I thought we have a pediatric care clinic in Lompoc?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:23:37 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Oh, I'm sorry. Are you just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:23:39 · ≈ 11:23 AM

saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:23:39 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Santa Maria? Supervisor Wolf, I am sorry. You are correct. We do have pediatrics in Lompoc and in South County but we do not offer pediatrics at Santa Maria and that is where we are seeing the MediCal shortfall at this time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:23:52 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Well that would be great, I would imagine. Okay good thank you.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:24:01 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Okay so as we'll go back to mental health then. So we've combined Fund 44 and Fund 48. Fund 44 would be mental health and Fund 48 would be the Mental Health Services Act. The combination there was a negative 12.4 million of which 6 million is a timing difference, 4.6 million of which will become that would be the funds that would no longer be necessary as the Projected losses are reduced and those funds won't be necessary to pay.

The balance of about 1.4 is Medi-Cal revenues, a timing difference that will be received by MHSA so that addresses 6 million of the 12.4 million. 1. 4 million of this will be expanded program within MHSA And then the balance of $5 million relates to mental health, and this would be lower revenue estimates as well as higher costs for inpatient services. And of this 5 million it is thought that 1.4 million could be offset by the move of the CARES program into MHSA so that the amount, as we think about what may be needed from general fund to support different departments, that 5 million would be initially an amount you'd want to look at If there is the 1.4 million benefit from the CARES move would bring down the number to about 3.6 million and that would be an issue that would need funding, and that funding could be coming from the general fund it could come from...there are a couple items that will be coming before your board later this month From funds that have freed up we saw the 4.6 million today, there's another 4.9 million that is related to favorable cost settlements with the state that has also freed up so the department will be coming back with identified liabilities including the current year liabilities and then the CEO's department will be coming back with identified funding sources that may be able to solve some of those problems.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:26:01 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Madam Chair?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:26:03 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Yes Supervisor Carbajal

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:26:05 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Thank you. Tom, this is very helpful. I'm just wondering if...I know we're going to get an item back from our board to look at how we could address some of the ongoing liabilities but notwithstanding that option or menu of how we could mitigate future liabilities what is the liability that we are basically looking at? for the mental health department ongoing into the next fiscal year that we have to address during budget deliberations. What's that figure? 3.6?

2:26 – 2:3513 turns

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:26:42 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Supervisor Carbajal, the $3.6 million is the amount that we've identified and are currently projecting as the fiscal year 11-12 loss from the department. So that would not be addressing cost settlements or future settlements. That's really looking at this current years operations of MediCal revenues and additional inpatient costs. The prior liabilities and cost settlements will be detailed out in the presentation that will be coming forward later this month.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:27:19 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Okay, let me ask it slightly different. As we look to our budget liabilities for next year and our budget deliberations what is the figure for mental health that we are going to be asked to come up with solutions for? What is that liability? Do we have any projected figure right now? I see Dr. Dietrich here.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:27:45 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Supervisor Carbajal, we do have identified known liabilities and estimated liabilities and that was going to be the presentation later this month. I do not have those figures in front of me. I don't know if Dr. Dietrich wants to speak to those at this point but it is challenging because we have known liabilities, estimated liabilities, and I think what we found For instance with the 4.6 million item that came to you, to the board today is that some of these liabilities are very hard to estimate and subject to audit and so forth. So you don't know where they're quite going to land. And so we're, I'll say

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:28:19 · ≈ 11:28 AM

somewhat... So we're not ready to come out with a figure yet?

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:28:21 · ≈ 11:28 AM

With the estimates certainly we're hesitant to do that but when we come forward we will identify those known liabilities that have a finalized number to them.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:28:30 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Okay Dr. Dietrich is here, I don't know

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:28:32 · ≈ 11:28 AM

if... Yeah, Dr. Dietrich did you want to speak to this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:28:42 · ≈ 11:28 AM

We will be coming, I believe the end of the day next week with a summary of known and estimated. Specifically for our operating budget next year and where we see service level impacts that's going to be roughly a little over a million dollars but there are significant multi-million dollar known and estimated liabilities due to the one time cost and that's what will be coming back on Tuesday.

Thank you.

GuestTaylorProposed · by introduction2:29:08 · ≈ 11:29 AM

And just to follow up on that, so when we come forward with that list of liabilities there are recorded reserves established for some of these liabilities. So it's, there's a lot of elements to this puzzle and when we come back we'll have all that summarized in a fashion so you can see what are the existing reserves, what are the known liabilities and what are the funds that have recently been freed up?

Okay. If we then move on to, just give me one sec. The variances from, we're still on attachment B which are the special revenue and other funds. These are some favorable variances now with workers' compensation fund 1911, we're seeing a positive $1.9 million variance and I'll point out that when we presented the second quarter projection, we had identified Also we were significantly now than we thought last quarter. What we're seeing is that there's a lot of insurance recoveries and or subrogation where we've identified, or other carriers have been identified as responsible for some of these costs that we've incurred. And so we're going back and we're actually recovering a lot of money in those regards.

There's also salary and benefit savings of about $276,000. And there was also a large deposit of about $180,000 that was with Corvell that has now come back. So all these combined have a favorable variance of $1.9 million. And as we close the year, we'll then look and evaluate how this fund ended up. What funds are available? How will that if that will impact the rates for the 12-13 year or whether they'll be rolled into the 13-14 year?

When we spoke to you last quarter, we identified that the last actuarial report had an underfunded balance of $4 million. This could go towards helping that situation and then the final note on workers comp as your board is aware a couple years ago The first dollar coverage is now carried through another insurance carrier, so we're not the primary coverage on this any longer. So what we have largely in this liability they refer to as tail claims. So there'll be, the tail will be getting smaller every year that we go out. So it'll be easier to predict as we go forward. So we'll keep an eye on this and come back to your board indicate how we're doing with that unfunded liability.

It would appear to me that this 1.9 million dollars very good news and can help reduce And with other efforts, maybe that $4 million will continue to come down as well. Next is the county liability for self-insurance. This has a favorable variance of $581,000. This was about the same amount that was presented last quarter and ties to the premium savings. And then lastly we just want to mention again the redevelopment agencies. So a lot of transition occurring here, we now have the successor agencies going through the process to identify all the liabilities of each of these existing organizations and at this point we don't have any firm numbers I think those will The audit I understand will be occurring in the July time frame and at, I assume at approximately that time we'll have a good idea of the liabilities and then might be able to estimate some of the funds that would be coming back to the taxing agencies.

So then this schedule again, so what I'm attempting to do here is the, what we did for the general funds is again to look at the special revenue and other funds. And so we're trying to back out those timing differences or where we know we have fund balance existing outside of the general fund to cover any adjustments. So we're starting at 3.4 million negative We add the general fund that was on that schedule, so that gets us up to our $9 million figure.

The negative that we're trying to identify. First five is not identified because again our criteria here was 500,000. The general fund does not contribute towards first five they have their own funding so they would be pulling from it's either a timing difference or they'd be pulling from their own fund balance So that 400,000 would reduce that. It won't be a general fund item. The capital funds as we talked about the 1.3 million there's existing fund balance for those public health has identified a timing difference that will I'd like Overall, relatively balanced within all groups. However we'll again mention that with mental health that within that one element Fund 44 there is a potential, there is a funding need that we've identified and currently estimated at about three and a half million dollars.

And then with public health and mental health will continue to review and keep an eye on those departments. So in summary, the actual activity is tracking ahead of budget. The general fund should end positive and about 4.4 million is what we're saying as adjusted. The signal chart indicated that of the 69 funds 63 are positive. Revenue appears to be increasing slightly.

Most departments are continuing to generate salary and benefit savings through vacancies and concessions And we'll continue to monitor the public health and mental health departments. And so at this point, we'll open it up to any questions.

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:35:01 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Thank you Mr. Alvarez. Questions from the board? Any questions at this time? Supervisor Carbajal do you have any questions?

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:35:12 · ≈ 11:35 AM

No, I just want to commend Mr. Alvarez again he and he just does an extraordinary job in presenting the information in a way that's pretty straightforward. I know Mr. Geis and other folks have assisted as part of the team that does this but I just can't tell you how great it is to get information that's really straight forward For us as decision makers, but for the public to really understand In a very straightforward fashion what the county finances look like and so kudos to CEO Waller and her team Mr. Alvarez and mr. Geis Really well done

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:35:53 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Thank you. I am public speakers. Mr. Allen

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:57 · ≈ 11:35 AM

request to speak from mr. Caldwell

2:36 – 2:397 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:36:04 · ≈ 11:36 AM

Well we almost got to you this morning Mr. Caldwell, it was close.

PresenterAndy CaldwellColabProposedself-stated2:36:07 · ≈ 11:36 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board, I'm Andy Caldwell representing Colab. Um, I think your staff has done a good job with this presentation and we're looking forward to this year's budget hearing bit because you know our complaint over the years has been that you present a quote unquote balanced budget but there in the long run And looking at the long range, it's not even close to being balanced. If you look at the pension fund liability, that alone is overwhelming.

But over the last couple of months we've seen that the road department said they need about another 15 million a year to stay on track with maintenance. The fire department, by some estimations within a few years they're gonna need an additional 15 to 20 million. You got public safety in the form of the jail and staffing for that jail. You have a plan thankfully CEO Waller has a plan to start setting aside monies towards that but that'll be upwards of 15 to $20 million. We've seen these Negotiations about increasing the property tax to fire.

We've seen counter proposals about reallocating Prop 172, but we kind of look at this as an exercise overall of shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic. You're moving money from one pot to another but there really isn't more money coming in You know, every once in a while we'll have variances with Prop 172 might be high one year and low. Property taxes may be going up or down a little bit depending on which market you look at.

But overall there's no plan to within five years have an additional $50 million a year coming into the county. There's no plan to be able to pay off a couple of hundred million a year, which could be your eventual pension debt in 10 to 20 years. Could be going up from 100 million to 200 million for your pension obligations. There's no plan. We keep looking through a keyhole.

What we need to do is take a step back and look at the panoramic view and come up with a plan Now you know I'm a broken record. I think the oil industry and agriculture are, and even the Chumash are three legs of perhaps Vandenberg Air Force Base and some other technology sectors are way that we can see the economy grow but in reality there's public interest groups and there's county ordinances standing in the way and in some cases state and federal rules.

Let's have a hearing on that Thank you. Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:39:13 · ≈ 11:39 AM

All right, we'll bring it back to the board for any additional comments otherwise I'll entertain a motion to receive and file.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.712:39:22 · ≈ 11:39 AM

So moved Madam Chair. All

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:39:23 · ≈ 11:39 AM

right I have a motion, I have a second roll call vote Mr. Allen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:28 · ≈ 11:39 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Aye. Mr. Carbajal? Aye. Ms. Wolf? Aye. Ms. Gray? Aye. Ms Farr?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:39:36 · ≈ 11:39 AM

Aye Thank you everybody, thank you Mr. Alvarez and everybody that participated in putting that report together it was excellent and now we're going to go to our last departmental agenda item for the day

2:39 – 2:4531 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:51 · ≈ 11:39 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board. Item 4 is in Public Works. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding establishment benefit assessments for County Service Area 31 and the North County Lighting District. This is for fiscal year 2012-13. This is in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th districts.

CommentSo JerryProposed · by introduction2:40:07 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Good afternoon Madam Chair and board members. As the clerk mentioned, this is our annual item for the consideration of assessments in CSA 31 and the North County Lighting District. Our recommendations this year are essentially the same as last year which was to continue the assessment in CSA 31 of $12.93 per residential parcel And in the North County Lighting District to leave it at zero.

We do have a three to four minute presentation, Madam Chair, if your board desires.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:40:38 · ≈ 11:40 AM

I think we can afford that. A couple of minutes. Can I just ask a quick question, Madam

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:42 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Chair? It says the second

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:40:43 · ≈ 11:40 AM

district?

CommentSo JerryProposed · by introduction2:40:44 · ≈ 11:40 AM

It says the second district because we think a small piece of CSA 31 may overlap with redistricting but I'll turn it over to Marty Wilder to maybe address that one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:40:57 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board, Supervisor Wolf. It either touches CSA 31 or it may be that second Supervisory District is actually CSA 3.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:06 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Because usually it's I mean I've always considered it to be CSA 3 so when I saw this as part of 31 I was wondering what parcels would be? So it wouldn't be the 2nd district?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:41:17 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Correct. It is not believed to be but might touch it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:20 · ≈ 11:41 AM

So we may need to correct...

CommentSo JerryProposed · by introduction2:41:21 · ≈ 11:41 AM

This is a point I think we need to clarify. Yes. We'll get back to your board on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:26 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Okay. And let's, maybe we can clarify it as part of the motion too because it's agendized as including the second. I apologize that I didn't get to you on this one but maybe we can just fix that as we move forward with this.

CommentSo JerryProposed · by introduction2:41:39 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Certainly and our presentation will be given by Marty Wilder he's our utilities manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:43 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Very good thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:41:45 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board. Today's action is addressed to address benefit assessments for County Service Area 3 and North County Lighting District. CSA 31 provides service to Isla Vista and North County Lighting District provide service to five zone areas which is the Los Alamos, Casamilla, Orchid and unincorporated areas of San Maria and Lompoc. Currently, CSA 3 has a benefit assessment rate of $12.93 per equivalency unit and that has been the rate since fiscal year 2008 and 2009.

This year we're proposing no change in the rates and there may be a change to the benefit of the revenue fund based on recent state legislative changes to the redevelopment agencies.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:42:31 · ≈ 11:42 AM

And actually before you leave that, in looking at page three it says that the $7600 approximately that are needed for next year's expenses are going to come from the fund balance. But this shows a fund reserve of zero. Is that just assuming zero after that 7624 is taken out?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:42:56 · ≈ 11:42 AM

With all the other services included, most of the services would be being funded by reserve. Some amount has to come from the reserve to pay for the street lighting if I'm answering the question correctly Madam Chair?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:43:08 · ≈ 11:43 AM

Okay but this is showing that you know is there going to be any fund reserved left after this year in CSA 31?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:43:18 · ≈ 11:43 AM

Madam Chair, yes there will be a fund reserved for the end of fiscal year 12-13 for example. It is projected that the fund reserve will be about $106,000. Oh okay

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:43:28 · ≈ 11:43 AM

so we still have a lot of money in that account then. All right thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:43:35 · ≈ 11:43 AM

For North County Lighting District, there is a benefit assessment but this year and has been the case since 2008-9 we are requesting the board set that rate at zero. This year will be no change proposed for that rate based on the fact that the fund is healthy Uh, therefore the adoptions before the board today are recommendations of the board are to recommend.

Recommendations of the board today or two adopt a resolution establishing the benefit assessment for CSA 31 at the base rate that we have established previously as well as not imposing the benefit assessment for North County lighting district.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:44:16 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Supervisor Wolf. Thank you Mr. Clerk. Um, so these, these recommendations don't include, CSA 3 or the areas that we were talking about. So do we need to, we can just adopt that and not have to worry about the way it was agendized correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:31 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Yes and we'll note in the minutes of that it does not include CSA three or the second district. Okay thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:44:40 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Any other questions from the board? Supervisor Carbajal any comments questions for you okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:47 · ≈ 11:44 AM

No questions.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:44:48 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Any public speakers Mr. Allen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:50 · ≈ 11:44 AM

No request to speak.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:44:52 · ≈ 11:44 AM

All right, well seeing that then it looks like we could entertain a motion here for staff's recommended actions. Motion? So moved. Motion. Second. A second all right roll call Mr. Allen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:45:10 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Mr. Lavagnino. Aye. Mr. Carbajal. Aye. Ms. Wolf? Aye. Ms. Grove? Aye. Ms Farber?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:45:17 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Aye and that completes our departmental agenda we will be going for lunch and for closed session and Mr. Marshall would you tell us what we're going to be talking about in closed session

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:45:29 · ≈ 11:45 AM

thank you madam chair you have three items on your closed session agenda today as noticed conference with legal counsel existing litigation Prancevich v Magana in United States District Court Conference with real property negotiator and you have public employee performance evaluation. And after we complete closed session, we will need to return for any reporting or any other action to adjourn.

2:45 – 2:467 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:45:55 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Right, we will come back into open session to conclude. All right, we will go into closed session and lunch thank you

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:46:09 · ≈ 11:46 AM

Madam Chair?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:46:12 · ≈ 11:46 AM

Yes, Supervisor

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:46:14 · ≈ 11:46 AM

Carbonell. What time do you want us in closed session?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:46:18 · ≈ 11:46 AM

In about ten minutes.

PresenterMarty WilderProposed · by introduction2:46:20 · ≈ 11:46 AM

Perfect I'll see you there in

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:46:21 · ≈ 11:46 AM

ten minutes. Thank you.