BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Memorial for Former Supervisor Naomi Schwartz

• The Board observed a moment of silence and shared personal memories to honor the late former First District Supervisor.
• Staff announced that the family is planning a public memorial service at the courthouse Sunken Garden in late July.
• County flags were lowered to half-staff in her honor, with a ceremony scheduled for the following day.

FY 2012-13 Budget Overview and Presentation

• Staff presented a proposed operating plan of approximately $800 million, funded by revenues and fund balances, with a staffing increase to 3,801 FTEs.
• The presentation highlighted a $27 million budget gap, to be closed through service level impacts and one-time funds.
• Discussion covered the shift of public safety spending to 50% of discretionary general fund revenues and the impact of pension cost assumptions.
• The Board indicated it would continue deliberations over the week, with final action potentially occurring on Friday or the following week.

Departmental Budget Presentation – Board of Supervisors

• Staff presented a $2.8 million operating budget fully funded by the General Fund, supporting 21.3 budgeted FTEs.
• Staff noted that discretionary funds for the Board have decreased from a high of $25,000 per office to $5,000 in the current year.

Departmental Budget Presentation – County Executive Office (CEO)

• Staff presented a $10.7 million operating budget with 46.9 FTEs, noting that excluding transfers, staff levels have decreased by over 30% in recent years.
• Service level impacts included the elimination of one administrative office professional and one fiscal and policy analyst.
• Board members discussed the need for a countywide PIO position and expressed concern regarding the elimination of a Clerk of the Board position.

Departmental Budget Presentation – County Counsel

• Staff presented a $7.2 million operating budget with 37.7 FTEs, noting a reduction of eight positions since 2007-08.
• Accomplishments cited included recovering $4.8 million in disallowed mental health funds and resolving 34 risk-funded cases at or below reserved amounts.
• A Supervisor requested a comparison of attorney and support staff numbers with Marin County to assess current staffing levels.

Public Information Video Presentation

• A video presentation outlined the Santa Barbara County budget process for the 2012-2013 fiscal year and the structure of the budget book.
• The presentation detailed the distribution of the approximately $200 million General Fund across seven functional areas.

Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – Court Special Services

• The Executive Officer presented a $15.8 million budget, noting a projected state funding reduction of at least $5.6 million for the 2012-2013 fiscal year.
• Staff reported that the collections program collected $9 million in delinquent fees and fines in the previous fiscal year.
• The Executive Officer warned of potential further reductions in civil trial time and public access if reserves are not allowed to be used.

Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – District Attorney

• The District Attorney presented a budget with an overall decrease of approximately $300,000 and a reduction in FTEs from 138.1 to 118.9.
• Discussion focused on a proposed truancy program, with the District Attorney arguing it was a better investment for crime reduction than hiring additional attorneys.
• The CEO indicated that the truancy program could be part of the Board’s budget deliberations.

Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – Public Defender

• The Public Defender presented a $9.8 million budget, noting the loss of nine full-time employees (12% of the workforce) in the previous year.
• A projected General Fund gap of $260,000 for 2013-2014 would require the elimination of at least three full-time positions.
• The Public Defender identified social worker positions, potentially funded by AB 109 grants, as the most effective use of additional resources to reduce jail bed days.

Board Discussion – Public Defender Contracting

• The CEO stated that privatization of the Public Defender’s Office is a priority for the strategic plan update and that the office will seek board direction on options.
• A Supervisor suggested the CEO’s office retrieve a previous report on agency reviews to inform the decision.
• Another Supervisor expressed concern about expending staff time on this measure without first gauging the Board's interest.

Board Inquiry Log Update

• Staff updated the Board on the inquiry log, stating that updated logs and answers had been distributed and would be posted online.
• The Chair requested hard copies for board binders by the following morning to allow maximum time for board and public review.

Fire Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• The Fire Chief presented a $52.8 million operating budget with a projected gap of $1.635 million after accounting for salary savings.
• Proposed service level impacts included the elimination of Engine 11 in Goleta and reductions in staffing at Station 22 and Engine 51.
• The Chief stated that without further concessions or revenue, station closures may be necessary in FY 2013-14.
• Board members discussed the critical importance of Station 11 due to its location near high-density residential areas and the Venicle Oil Processing Facility.

Probation Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• The Chief presented a $46.2 million budget with FTEs increasing by 25 primarily due to public safety realignment (AB 109).
• Service level impacts included the elimination of one school-based officer and the expiration of funding for a second officer at Rigetti High School.
• The department projected a FY 2013-14 budget gap of $2.7 million and discussed the low collection rate on fees referred to the Franchise Tax Board.

Sheriff’s Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• The Sheriff presented a $112.7 million operating budget, noting a loss of 74.5 FTEs over the last five years.
• Proposed service level impacts included the elimination of the Gang Enforcement Team and a 50% reduction in the Narcotics Bureau, though some positions were retained due to fund balance rollovers.
• The Sheriff requested the restoration of three custody deputies and one sheriff’s deputy to reduce overtime and maintain minimum staffing.

Public Safety / Sheriff’s Department Budget Presentation (Continued)

• The Sheriff reported that legislation is prepared to shift funding from AB 900 Phase 1 to Phase 2, contingent on the state budget passing.
• The Sheriff outlined steps for jail construction, including design modifications for a 300-bed facility and a projected five-year construction timeline.
• Board members clarified the calculation of General Fund contributions for jail operations, which are projected to increase to $3.3 million in FY 13-14.

Community Resources and Public Facilities / Agriculture and Cooperative Extension Budget Presentation

• The Agricultural Commissioner presented a $3.7 million budget with a General Fund contribution of $1.36 million.
• Service level impacts included the elimination of one agricultural biologist position, resulting in a potential 40% decrease in pesticide monitoring inspections.
• The CEO clarified that fees from the new price scanner program are legally restricted and cannot be used to offset cuts to agricultural positions.

Community Resources and Public Facilities / Community Services Department Budget Presentation

• The Director presented a $17.9 million operating budget, noting a 28% reduction in benefited staff since FY 2004-05.
• Service level impacts included the elimination of 100% of one-time funding for human service programs and the elimination of two park ranger positions.
• The Director clarified that the four FTEs associated with the library budget line item are departmental administrative staff and not paid from library-specific funds.

Community Resources and Public Facilities / Planning and Development Department Budget Presentation

• The Director presented a $15.1 million operating budget, reflecting a 41% reduction in staff from five years ago.
• Service level impacts included the reduction of two FTEs in long-range planning, leaving no capacity for new projects.
• The department projected a budget gap of $694,000 for FY 2013-14 and plans to pursue grant funding and adjust permit fees to reflect true costs.

Long-Range Planning and Economic Development

• The CEO responded that the department maintains vacant, unfunded positions to allow for rapid staffing increases if revenues become available.
• The department head confirmed that the reduction of two FTEs in long-range planning leaves no capacity for new projects.
• The department head estimated the cost to restore the two FTEs at approximately $120,000.

Public Works Budget Presentation

• The Director presented a $109.7 million budget, noting an 18% reduction in staffing levels since FY 07-08.
• Financial threats included a potential financial liability of $200,000 to $1.7 million from an Office of the Inspector General audit of FEMA.
• The Director stated that the Allen-Barcadero project has a $1.2 million unfunded balance, with a budget revision request scheduled for board consideration.

Public Comment – Human Services Funding

• A First District Commissioner spoke in support of the $1.2 million Human Services funding allocation, stating it generates $9.6 million in community services.
• The Commissioner urged the Board to reinstate the funding indefinitely in the county budget.

Procedural Discussion – Fountain Ceremony

• Supervisor Carbajal inquired about the Brown Act implications of adjourning to attend a fountain ceremony.
• A council member clarified that the event is ceremonial and would not violate the Brown Act provided no county business is discussed.
• The Chair invited Board members to attend the ceremony at the courthouse at 11:00 AM the following morning.

Closed Session

• No closed session items were reported in the provided summary.

Agenda Item: Memorial for Former Supervisor Naomi Schwartz

• The Board observed a moment of silence to honor the recent passing of former First District Supervisor Naomi Schwartz. Staff and supervisors shared personal memories and professional reflections regarding her tenure. Supervisor Carbajal announced that the family is planning a public memorial service at the Sunken Garden at the courthouse at the end of July. The Chair read an excerpt from an email from former County Surveyor Mike Emmons. The County flag was noted to have been lowered in her honor the previous week, and flags were scheduled to be at half-staff for a ceremony at the courthouse the following day. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: General Public Comment (Non-Budget)

• Two members of the public addressed the Board. Robin Barber of SEIU Local 620 raised concerns regarding workplace bullying and urged the County to establish effective avenues for addressing such issues. Amanda Caldwell of COLAB discussed the state’s financial shortfall, arguing that the true deficit is higher than reported and that the County’s budget process fails to adequately account for state fiscal crises. She also requested increased time limits for public comment when multiple departments are bunched together. The Board accepted the comments. No motions were made or voted upon.

Agenda Item: FY 2012-13 Budget Overview and Presentation

• Staff provided a tutorial on accessing budget documents via the County’s website. The County Executive Officer (CEO) presented the proposed FY 2012-13 operating plan, noting proposed expenditures of approximately $800 million funded by $746 million in revenues and $54 million in fund balances. The presentation highlighted a staffing increase of approximately 88 FTEs to 3,801, primarily due to AB 109 Public Safety Realignment and federal/state funding. It noted $15 million in savings from labor negotiations, service level reductions in several departments, and significant deferred maintenance backlogs. A property tax transfer was approved to fund the Fire District, and a $2 million set-aside was included for future jail operations.
• The Budget Director detailed the budget development process, noting an initial gap of $15 million that grew to $27 million after detailed loading. Solutions to close the gap include $10.9 million in service level impacts and $16.1 million in one-time funds. The presentation analyzed revenue sources, noting that public safety spending increased from 34% to 50% of discretionary general fund revenues between FY 2002-03 and FY 2012-13. Pension costs were discussed, noting a recent decision by the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System to maintain the assumed rate of return at 7.75%, estimated to reduce the county’s contribution by approximately $10 million in FY 2013-14. The Strategic Reserve is projected to end FY 2011-12 at approximately $25.5 million.
• Supervisor Gray asked clarifying questions regarding the breakdown of the FTE increase, specifically positions related to AB 109 and health/public services. Staff clarified that AB 109 positions are not funded by the General Fund. A Supervisor raised concerns regarding the use of one-time funds, the lack of discussion on increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax, and proposed cuts to human services, homeless contracts, and mental health beds. Another Supervisor requested a breakdown of the $28 million designated for future use and up-to-date revenue information. Staff explained that the $28 million includes funds for the new jail, strategic reserve, and unspent grant money. Staff clarified that the $6.1 million in salary and benefit reductions is projected for FY 2013-14.
• Discussion regarding RDA dissolution funds noted that timing and amounts are uncertain due to ongoing litigation and proposed state legislation. Staff confirmed a recent $2.1 million distribution was not anticipated when the budget was developed.
• Public comment addressed the reduced length of the budget book, the lack of detailed performance metrics, and the structural deficit. One speaker argued that economic forecasts fail to account for the cost of state regulations and advocated for the oil industry as a solution to the budget shortfall. Another speaker advocated for economic vitality programs and criticized the lack of discussion on contracting out services and regulatory streamlining.
• The Board indicated it would continue deliberations over the week, with final action potentially occurring on Friday or the following week. No vote was taken on the budget adoption in this segment.

Agenda Item: Departmental Budget Presentation – Board of Supervisors

• Staff presented the Board of Supervisors budget: Total operating budget of $2.8 million, fully funded by General Fund, with 21.3 budgeted FTEs. Staff noted that discretionary funds for the Board have decreased from a high of $25,000 per office to $5,000 in the current year. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Departmental Budget Presentation – County Executive Office (CEO)

• Staff presented the CEO Office budget: Total operating budget of $10.7 million ($7.7 million General Fund, $30,000 capital), with 46.9 budgeted FTEs. Staff explained that the current FTE count includes transfers from other departments. Excluding these transfers, staff levels have decreased by over 30% in recent years. Service level impacts included the elimination of one administrative office professional and one fiscal and policy analyst. Staff projected a $376,000 gap for 2013-14.
• A Supervisor commended the leadership regarding the EPIC group and raised the need for a countywide PIO position. Another Supervisor expressed concern about the elimination of a Clerk of the Board position. Staff (Clerk of the Board) explained that the office has maintained service levels using extra help and new assessment appeals filing fees. A Supervisor noted that the Tax Assessment Appeals Board position was eliminated but work is being covered by extra help. Another Supervisor expressed concern about the timing of agenda binders, suggesting the Board should receive materials a week in advance. Staff confirmed that the satellite system contract for emergency radio readiness is in effect. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Departmental Budget Presentation – County Counsel

• Staff presented the County Counsel budget: Total operating budget of $7.2 million ($2.3 million General Fund, $4.9 million revenue-generated), with 37.7 budgeted FTEs. Staff noted a reduction of eight positions since 2007-08. Accomplishments cited included recovering $4.8 million in disallowed mental health funds and resolving 34 risk-funded cases at or below reserved amounts. Staff projected a $215,000 shortfall for 2013-14.
• Supervisors expressed appreciation for the legal team’s work. A Supervisor noted that the number of attorneys in the County Counsel office has decreased to levels comparable to similar counties. Another Supervisor asked for a comparison of attorney and support staff numbers with Marin County. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Public Information Video Presentation

• A video presentation was shown to the Board outlining the Santa Barbara County budget process for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. The presentation explained the structure of the budget book and detailed the distribution of the approximately $200 million General Fund across seven functional areas. It noted that the CEO would present the budget proposal to the Board on June 11, 13, and 15. No motions were made or votes taken.

Agenda Item: Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – Court Special Services

• Gary Blair, Executive Officer for the Superior Court, presented the budget for Court Special Services. The total operating budget is $15.8 million, of which $10.5 million is a pass-through payment to the state. The local county-funded portion is approximately $5.29 million. Blair reported that the collections program collected $9 million in delinquent fees and fines in the previous fiscal year. He addressed state budget cuts, indicating a projected reduction of at least $5.6 million for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. In response to questions from Supervisor Gray, Blair explained that the collections department has six full-time representatives with a 43% collection rate. He warned of potential further reductions in civil trial time and public access if reserves are not allowed to be used or if funding is not restored. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – District Attorney

• District Attorney Dudley presented the 2012-2013 budget, noting an overall decrease of approximately $300,000 from the adopted 2011-2012 budget. The General Fund contribution is 64% of the total. The FTE count decreased from 138.1 to 118.9. Dudley highlighted accomplishments including the filing of 14,274 cases and the establishment of a primary investigation role for internet crimes against children. Dudley stated there would be no service level impacts for 2012-2013. For 2013-2014, a projected budget shortfall of $88,273 was noted.
• Supervisor Carbajal raised the issue of a proposed truancy program, which was not included in the DA’s budget presentation. Supervisor Lavagnino noted that a Grand Jury had recommended funding for this program. CEO Andy Caldwell indicated that the truancy program could be part of the Board’s budget deliberations. Supervisor Wolff asked whether $170,000 for the truancy program was the best use of funds compared to hiring an additional attorney. Dudley stated that he believed the truancy program was a better investment for the county to reduce crime. When asked how he would spend additional funds if not on truancy, Dudley indicated a need for investigators and support staff rather than additional attorneys. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Law and Justice Departmental Budgets – Public Defender

• The Public Defender’s Office presented its budget, stating an operating budget of $9.8 million, with 70% ($6.9 million) funded by the county General Fund. The office has 61 full-time employees and represented clients in over 22,000 matters in the previous fiscal year. The presentation noted that the office had lost nine full-time employees (12% of the workforce) in the previous year. For the 2013-2014 fiscal year, the presentation identified a projected General Fund gap of $260,000. If this deficit materializes, the office would need to eliminate at least three full-time positions. The presentation also highlighted challenges related to the Public Safety Realignment Act and the need to replace the case management system.
• Supervisor Lavagnino asked about the use of volunteers and interns. Supervisor Wolff inquired about the status of the move to the new courthouse, with the Public Defender confirming the move was scheduled for June 30. Supervisor Carbajal suggested the possibility of paid internships or fellowships to attract new attorneys. The Public Defender indicated they were looking into paid fellowship options. The Chair asked about the best use of additional resources for reducing jail bed days, to which the Public Defender responded that social worker positions, potentially funded by AB 109 grants, would be the most effective use. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Public Comment – Law and Justice Budget

• Andy Caldwell, representing COLAB, addressed the board regarding the funding of law and justice departments. He cited the example of San Luis Obispo County, where public defenders are contract employees, arguing that this model allows for significant cost savings. He requested that the board investigate this contracting model and schedule a discussion to review long-range statistics on substance abuse treatment courts, probation outcomes, and inter-departmental data connectivity.

Agenda Item: Board Discussion – Public Defender Contracting

• Supervisor Lavagnino asked CEO Waller if the board had previously addressed contracting out for the Public Defender’s Office. CEO Waller stated that while privatization was discussed in the past, it is a priority for the strategic plan update, and the CEO’s office will seek board direction on potential options. Supervisor Wolf noted that a report by the previous public defender regarding agency reviews might exist and suggested the CEO’s office retrieve it. Supervisor Gray stated that he has advocated for this cost-saving measure for years but expressed concern about expending staff time if board support is limited, suggesting the board first gauge its interest before the CEO’s office conducts extensive work. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Board Inquiry Log Update

• Mr. Alvarez updated the board on the board inquiry log. He stated that updated logs and answers had been distributed and would be posted online. He offered to provide hard copies for board binders either the following morning or Wednesday, depending on the board’s preference. The Chair requested the sooner option to allow maximum time for board and public review. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Fire Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• Fire Chief Michael W. Dyer presented the FY 2012-13 budget, showing an operating budget of $52.8 million and a capital budget of $100,000. He noted a 14% reduction in total positions since FY 2009-10, with 245 budgeted FTEs. Key accomplishments included the installation of automatic vehicle locators, enhanced EMS services at UCSB, and the approval of a property tax transfer. The presentation highlighted a projected budget gap of $1.635 million after accounting for salary savings and additional funds. Proposed service level impacts included: 1. Engine 11 (Goleta): Elimination of the engine, resulting in the loss of nine firefighter positions. Chief Dyer cited the CityGate report, stating that this would reduce response capabilities in densely populated areas and impact Swift Water Rescue operations. 2. Station 22 (Orchid): Reduction of one firefighter position daily, impacting EMS and firefighting capabilities and the ability to deploy water tenders. 3. Engine 51 (Mission Hills): Reduction of the engineer position to a firefighter position, decreasing leadership and EMS capability.
• Chief Dyer stated that without further concessions or revenue, station closures may be necessary in FY 2013-14.
• Supervisor Gray questioned how the department maintains service levels with a reduction from 285 to 245 FTEs. Chief Dyer identified the loss of the fuels crew (approx. 24 FTEs) and fire prevention positions as significant gaps. He explained that the decision to cut Engine 11 was based on threat assessment and systems approach, noting that the CityGate report concurred with the need for resource optimization.
• Andy Caldwell noted that actual staffing levels in FY 2010-11 were approximately 247, suggesting the current recommended level of 245 is not a drastic reduction from recent actuals.
• Supervisor Wolf asked how the remaining $600,000 differential (after applying RDA and grant funds to the initial $2.3 million gap) would be allocated among the three proposed cuts. Chief Dyer stated that the $600,000 would not fully restore Engine 11 but that Engine 11 is the most critical resource due to population density.
• Supervisor Carbajal noted that voluntary negotiations with firefighters are ongoing and hoped the results would help address the shortfall. The Chair emphasized the critical importance of Station 11 due to its location near high-density residential areas, commercial centers, and the Venicle Oil Processing Facility. Andy Caldwell suggested approaching the City of Goleta to explore a property tax transfer or other funding mechanisms to support the station, given that many of the facilities it serves are within city limits. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Probation Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• Chief Taylor presented the FY 2012-13 budget of $46.2 million, with 53% financed by the general fund. FTEs increased by 25 primarily due to public safety realignment (AB 109). Accomplishments included an 87% non-recidivism rate for juvenile offenders exiting probation and a 97% completion rate for the Los Prados Boys Academy. The department transferred reprographic equipment from the county and launched the Los Prados Business Center for vocational training. In the adult division, 94% of probationers exiting supervision were not convicted of a felony during their term. The department assumed collection responsibilities, transferring $1.6 million in outstanding fees to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) for collection.
• Service level impacts included the elimination of one school-based officer at Fitzgerald Continuation School and the expiration of funding for a second officer at Rigetti High School. The department projected a FY 2013-14 budget gap of $2.7 million.
• Supervisor Gray questioned the collection rate on the $1.6 million referred to the FTB, noting that only $175,000 had been collected. A department representative explained that the primary collection tool is wage garnishment, which is less effective during economic downturns and unemployment. The representative stated that the department lacks sufficient staff to pursue small claims judgments independently and that the FTB typically closes cases if the individual cannot be located or after a certain period (approximately one year of active collection attempts). The debt remains collectible for up to 10 years after the close of probation.
• Supervisor Wolf thanked the department for its work on AB 109 and its evidence-based programs in collaboration with UCSB. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Sheriff’s Department Budget Presentation (FY 2012-13)

• Sheriff Brown presented the FY 2012-13 proposed operating budget of $112.7 million. He stated that the department has lost 74.5 FTEs (10% of the workforce) over the last five years. The proposed budget includes 624.9 FTEs, a reduction of 21 positions from the current year. Proposed service level impacts included: 1. Elimination of the Gang Enforcement Team (2 positions). 2. 50% reduction in the Narcotics Bureau (1 sergeant, 3 detectives). 3. Reduction of 2 detectives in the Criminal Investigation Division. 4. Reduction of the Santa Maria Branch Jail from 24/7 to 7 nights a week (7 custody deputies, 1 utility worker, 1 administrative professional). 5. Reduction of 4 bailiff positions for court security.
• Sheriff Brown noted two positive developments: a $1.3 million fund balance rollover from salary savings due to vacancies and labor concessions, and an increase in AB 109 funding of $1.8 million. These funds allowed the retention of the gang team, detectives, and narcotics positions previously slated for elimination. He requested the restoration of three custody deputies and one sheriff’s deputy (net cost of $227,064 for the year) to reduce overtime and maintain minimum staffing in the jail and courts. He also highlighted the progress on the North County Jail project, with $60 million in state grants awarded and an additional $20 million expected.
• Supervisor Lavagnino asked why the courts or state do not fully cover bailiff costs. Sheriff Brown explained that the county has historically subsidized costs for training and equipment beyond what the state reimbursed, and the department can no longer afford to subsidize the service. Supervisor Lavagnino noted that while the budget has increased, benefits costs have risen significantly (from $31 million in 2010-11 to $45 million in 2013), and he supported seeking new revenue sources.
• Supervisor Gray asked about the source of funds for overtime. Sheriff Brown explained that overtime is currently funded by salary savings from vacant positions, but the high number of vacancies and increased workload from AB 109 (churning more inmates through the system) is causing excessive overtime and staff exhaustion. Supervisor Gray expressed support for the staffing request, noting the complexity of jail management. No vote was taken.

Agenda Item: Public Safety / Sheriff’s Department Budget Presentation (Continued)

• The Sheriff presented an update on jail funding and operations. He reported that legislation is prepared to shift funding from AB 900 Phase 1 to AB 900 Phase 2, contingent on the state budget passing by Friday. If approved, the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) is expected to authorize the full requested grant amount (an additional $20 million on top of the $60 million already secured) at its September meeting. The Sheriff outlined the subsequent steps for jail construction, including design modifications for a 300-bed facility (reduced from 304 due to AB 109), inclusion of medical and mental health components, and a projected five-year construction timeline.
• Board members asked questions regarding:
• Service Levels: Clarification was sought on the "status quo" for jail operations. The Sheriff explained that while the budget funds 24/7 operations, staffing vacancies have prevented full implementation, resulting in current 12-hour daily operations.
• San Andreas Valley Positions: The loss of five positions was attributed to reduced state funding from the Indian Gaming Benefit Distribution Fund. The Sheriff noted discussions with tribal leadership to potentially restore funding for one 24/7 position, but no agreement has been reached.
• General Fund Contributions: The Sheriff and CEO clarified the calculation of General Fund contributions for jail operations. The contribution is cumulative: $1 million in FY 11-12, increasing to $2 million in FY 12-13, and $3.3 million in FY 13-14. The CEO confirmed the total projected deficit for the next year is approximately $20 million, including these contributions.
• Public comment included one speaker advocating for maintaining public safety funding, citing low arrest rates for burglary and the need for jail capacity. They suggested reallocating funds from the Gaviota Coast Plan, Children’s Health Insurance Program, and smoking cessation programs to support public safety. Another speaker, representing the City of Goleta, expressed concern over proposed reductions in firefighter staffing (from 28 to 15) and the closure of Station 19. They requested that the county find funding to maintain service levels and noted that Goleta contributes significantly to county revenues through property and sales taxes while also paying for its own law enforcement and fire district services.
• No motion was made, seconded, or voted upon during this segment. The Chair noted that final decisions would be made on Friday after hearing all input.

Agenda Item: Community Resources and Public Facilities / Agriculture and Cooperative Extension Budget Presentation

• The Agricultural Commissioner presented the FY 2012-13 budget, totaling approximately $3.7 million, with a General Fund contribution of $1.36 million (37%). The budget funds 27 FTEs, representing a 24% decrease in positions since FY 2006-07.
• Key points included:
• Accomplishments: Increased pesticide enforcement inspections (field fumigation up 75%, structural fumigation up 87%), eradication of Japanese Knotweed in Lompoc (17 tons removed), and funding for UC Cooperative Extension through cost savings.
• Service Level Impacts: Elimination of one agricultural biologist position, resulting in a potential 40% decrease in pesticide monitoring inspections and a 20% reduction in plant material inspections. A $27,000 reduction in the UC Cooperative Extension contract will result in the loss of a rangeland advisor and a natural resource specialist.
• Future Outlook: A projected budget gap of $201,000 for FY 2013-14, primarily due to increased benefit and retirement costs. The department faces uncertainty regarding USDA funding for the Light Brown Apple Moth regulatory program and continues to rely on one-time funds for UC Cooperative Extension.
• Board members asked questions regarding:
• Pesticide Enforcement: The Commissioner confirmed that losing one biologist would significantly impact the pesticide enforcement program, requiring a scaling back of outreach and education to maintain core mandated functions.
• Scanner Program Funds: The CEO clarified that fees from the new price scanner program are legally restricted to that specific program and cannot be used to offset cuts to agricultural positions. The CEO committed to providing a budget inquiry form by the next day to analyze potential General Fund reallocation opportunities.
• No motion was made, seconded, or voted upon during this segment.

Agenda Item: Community Resources and Public Facilities / Community Services Department Budget Presentation

• The Director of Community Services presented the FY 2012-13 budget, totaling $17.9 million in operating expenses and $2.6 million in capital expenses. The General Fund contribution is $6.2 million (25%). The department includes 89.8 FTEs, a 28% reduction in benefited staff since FY 2004-05.
• Key points included:
• Accomplishments: Installation of cabins and yurts at Kachuma Lake and Halama Beach (80% occupancy), reopening of Guadalupe Dunes Road, and funding for 192 affordable housing units.
• Service Level Impacts: Elimination of 100% of one-time funding for human service programs ($1.2 million), a 13% reduction ($45,000) in General Fund contributions to shelter providers, elimination of $200,000 in contributions to local conference and visitor bureaus, elimination of two park ranger and four maintenance worker positions, and a 51% reduction ($75,000) in building landscape maintenance contracts.
• Future Outlook: A projected budget gap of $286,000 for FY 2013-14 due to uncertain grant availability and rising salary/benefit costs.
• Board members asked questions regarding:
• Capital Carryover: The Director explained that capital fund carryovers are due to incomplete grant-funded projects (e.g., Kachuma, Goleta lift station) requiring full funding before completion.
• Grants Administration: The Director confirmed that the elimination of the grants administration position would not eliminate the program; tasks would be redistributed to existing staff. The CEO noted that the CEO’s office is working with the Auditor-Controller to strengthen contract compliance oversight county-wide.
• Park Staffing: The Director clarified that the eliminated park ranger positions are currently vacant and funded, and responsibilities would be shifted to existing staff.
• Library Administration: The Director and CEO clarified that the four FTEs associated with the library budget line item are departmental administrative staff (Director, CFO, Cost Analyst, Secretary) and are not paid from library-specific funds. The library funding is a pass-through. The CEO committed to providing a budget inquiry form regarding consolidation efficiencies by the next day.
• Public comment included one speaker expressing concern over the elimination of contributions to the Human Services Commission, shelter providers, and the Conference and Visitors Bureau, citing the importance of these services to the community and economic development. Another speaker raised concerns about the elimination of maintenance positions (plumbers, mechanics, water/sewage operators), noting the risk to park infrastructure and visitor experience. They also questioned the closure of Guadalupe Dunes Park two days a week, citing the lack of visible ranger activity in the past. A third speaker questioned the reservation system at Halama Beach, noting local opposition in Lompoc, and asked how local park users would be accommodated. The Director stated that the rollout of the reservation system would be assessed for community impact before implementation.
• No motion was made, seconded, or voted upon during this segment.

Agenda Item: Community Resources and Public Facilities / Planning and Development Department Budget Presentation

• The Planning and Development Director presented the FY 2012-13 operating budget of $15.1 million, reflecting a $133,000 reduction in building permit revenue. The General Fund contribution is $3.7 million (25%), a 44% reduction from five years ago. The budget includes 87 FTEs, a 41% reduction in staff from 149 positions five years ago.
• Key points included:
• Accomplishments: Updates to zoning codes (streamlining, hearing waiver process, protections for residential parking/storage, environmental review requirements for hydraulic fracturing), renewal of the Economic Hardship Time Extension Process, adoption of the Mobile Home Park Closure Ordinance, and the Medical Marijuana Storefront Dispensary Ban.
• Service Level Impacts: Reduction of two FTEs in long-range planning (inability to take on new projects), loss of 0.5 FTE in public counter staff (potential longer wait times), reduction of two FTEs in planning/permitting (potential delays in permit review), reduction of nearly two FTEs in administrative/GIS/IT/fiscal staff (reduced capacity for system updates and web pages), and a reduction of 2.4 FTEs in building inspection/public counter support/electrical plan check due to a downward trend in permits.
• Future Outlook: A projected budget gap of $694,000 for FY 2013-14 due to decreased one-time funding and increased labor/health/retirement costs. The department will pursue grant funding, adjust permit fees to reflect true costs, and may require increased General Fund contributions or further service reductions to balance the budget.
• No motion was made, seconded, or voted upon during this segment. The Chair invited questions from the Board, with Supervisor Carbajal beginning to speak as the transcript ended.

Agenda Item: Departmental Budget Presentations and Public Comment (Continued)

Long-Range Planning and Economic Development

• A board member inquired about the flexibility of the budget to handle increased activity or long-range planning projects. The CEO responded that the department maintains vacant, unfunded positions to allow for rapid staffing increases if revenues become available or if grant funding is secured. A board member asked about the reduction of two FTEs in long-range planning and the capacity to take on new projects. The department head confirmed that the reduction leaves no capacity for new projects. The board member noted a previous board priority to fund an economic development position upon expansion. The department head estimated the cost to restore the two FTEs at approximately $120,000.

Public Works Budget Presentation

• The Public Works Director presented the proposed budget for FY 12-13 through 13-14, totaling $109.7 million ($85.6 million operating, $24.1 million capital improvement). The general fund contribution is $2.7 million (2.2% of the total), including $1.6 million for Measure A maintenance of effort. Staffing levels have decreased from 332.2 employees in FY 07-08 to 281.5 employees in the proposed FY 12-13 budget, an 18% reduction. The presentation highlighted the award of waste hauling franchise agreements in Zones 2, 4, and 5; completion of the 6.3-mile Santa Maria levee rehabilitation; installation of a 1-megawatt solar field at Laguna County Sanitation; and $9.8 million in transportation capital improvements. The department reported $1.6 million in cost savings to the general fund in FY 11-12.
• Financial threats and outlook included an Office of the Inspector General audit of FEMA regarding 2005 storm repairs posing a potential financial liability ranging from $200,000 to $1.7 million. The unfunded transportation need has grown to over $250 million. For FY 13-14, anticipated staffing cost increases (salaries and benefits) are estimated at $1.7 million. The department plans to address this gap through service level reductions, revenue/rate increases, and staffing adjustments. Examples provided included the potential elimination of the pavement preservation program, turning off county-funded streetlights, or eliminating 14 positions.
• Regarding the Isla Vista Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Dissolution, a board member inquired about the status of infrastructure projects in Isla Vista following the dissolution of the RDA. The Public Works Director stated that the Allen-Barcadero project has a total cost of $4.4 million, with $1.6 million remaining. Of this, $400,000 is funded by District 3 Measure A sidewalk funding, leaving a $1.2 million unfunded balance. A budget revision request for $190,000 to reduce the unfunded balance is scheduled for board consideration on June 26. Projects involving two developments on the east side of El Embarcadero are currently on hold.

Public Comment

• The board accepted public comment from numerous individuals and representatives of various organizations. Comments were generally focused on the following topics:
• Economic Development: Multiple speakers, including mayors from Buellton, Lompoc, and Solvang, and representatives from the Energy and Economic Development Coalition, urged the creation of a countywide Office of Economic Development or a dedicated economic development position. They argued that a coordinated county strategy would attract business, generate revenue, and create jobs more effectively than individual city efforts.
• Human Services and Homelessness: Representatives from the Food Bank, Salvation Army, Good Samaritan Shelter, Casa Esperanza, the Independent Living Resource Center, Legal Aid, the Consumer Advocacy Coalition, and the Alpha Resource Center spoke in opposition to proposed cuts to the Human Services Commission and shelter services. They argued that reducing these services would lead to increased homelessness, higher costs for law enforcement and public health, and a loss of critical safety net services for vulnerable populations. They requested the restoration of funding to maintain shelter beds and support networks.
• Tourism and Film Industry: Speakers representing the Marriott Marketing, San Ynez Valley Hotel Association, Santa Barbara Conference and Visitors Bureau, and the Film Commission opposed proposed cuts to tourism promotion and film commission funding. They cited tourism as a major economic driver generating significant sales tax and bed tax revenue, and noted that film production brings substantial direct spending and free public relations to the county.
• Agriculture: Representatives from the Lompoc Ranchers, Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau, and the Environmental Defense Center urged the board to maintain funding for the Ag Commissioner’s Office. They highlighted the importance of the ag industry as the county’s top economic sector and the critical need for biologists to inspect exports and prevent invasive pests, noting that state funding cuts have already reduced staff levels.
• Parks and Environment: A Parks Commission chair and representatives from the OPEN Program and Community Environmental Council urged the board to maintain funding for parks and the Climate Action Plan. They cited the importance of parks for tourism and community well-being, and the economic and environmental benefits of climate action projects.
• Labor: A representative from SEIU Local 620 asked the board to carefully evaluate the long-term costs of contracting out public service jobs, suggesting that in-house staff may be more cost-effective and provide better service in the long run.
• No motions were made, seconded, or voted upon during this segment of the transcript. The board acknowledged the comments and thanked the speakers.

Agenda Item: Public Comment – Human Services Funding

• Cristina Pizarro, identified as a First District Commissioner, spoke in support of the $1.2 million Human Services funding allocation. She stated that this amount generates $9.6 million in community services and urged the Board to reinstate the funding indefinitely in the county budget.

Agenda Item: Closing Remarks and Adjournment

• The Chair concluded the public comment period. Andy Caldwell, identified as CEO Waller, expressed appreciation for the Board’s guidance and noted that follow-up information would be provided to assist with deliberations. The Chair thanked county staff and public attendees.

Agenda Item: Procedural Discussion – Fountain Ceremony

• Supervisor Carbajal inquired about the Brown Act implications of adjourning to attend a fountain ceremony. A council member clarified that the event is ceremonial, not county-sponsored, and would not violate the Brown Act provided no county business is discussed. The Chair invited Board members to attend the ceremony at the courthouse at 11:00 AM the following morning.

Decision

• The meeting was adjourned until Wednesday morning at 9:00 AM for the remaining departmental presentations and deliberations.