BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 19, 2012

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:0314 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role0:05 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Good morning everybody and welcome to this regular meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors of June 19th, 2012. We're glad you're with us today. Mr. Allen would you start us off by calling the roll please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:17 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Here! Mr. Carbajal? Ms. Wolfe? Here. Ms. Gray? Present. Ms Farr?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role0:24 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Here. Thank you. Would you all

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈13s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role0:25 · ≈ 9:00 AM

please rise with me for the Pledge of Allegiance

Under God, indivisible with liberty and justice

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction0:44 · ≈ 9:00 AM

for all.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role0:49 · ≈ 9:00 AM

Okay and we have our minutes of the meeting of May 22nd if there are no changes or corrections I'll entertain a motion to approve. Motion. Do we have a second? Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries, thank you very much. We'll go right into our public comment period. Supervisor Lavagnino I understand you wanted to say something.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction1:15 · ≈ 9:01 AM

Thank You Madam Chair. I've been instructed that just for clarification purposes that we want to make an announcement In our stand down event, we will also be having this open to San Luis Obispo County residents and veterans. And we were going to be doing that by providing them the opportunity by picking them up at the slow Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter. So I think it was just clarification to let folks know that there were some people outside the county that will be being

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:47 · ≈ 9:01 AM

served.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction1:51 · ≈ 9:01 AM

October 13th Saturday

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:54 · ≈ 9:01 AM

That's going to be a wonderful event. Thank you, Supervisor Lavagnino for organizing that with your staff. Other members of the board that have public comment to make at this time? Any announcements? Any members of the public? Mr. Allen, I want to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09 · ≈ 9:02 AM

speak. No request to speak.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:10 · ≈ 9:02 AM

Okay well then before we conclude public comment I'd like to go ahead and honor our volunteer for this week Judith Rubenstein She's going to be leaving soon for Rwanda to work with the Mediators Beyond Borders Team Rwanda. Mediators Beyond Borders is a volunteer organization with a unique interdisciplinary model which brings together mediators and allied professionals to collaborate on building capacity for peace around the world.

This is Judith's second trip to Rwanda in less than a year, and she expects to go a third time in 2013. Based on an assessment trip last year, Judith's team is developing a unique trauma-infused mediation training model that incorporates advanced mediation skills with trauma healing techniques to support reconciliation in Rwanda's post-genocide environment. The team will help Rwandans address the PTSD experienced by an entire nation who lived through the horrific genocide of 1994 in which a million people were slaughtered in less than 100 days.

Judith says that this trip is crucial for the project because her team will be conducting the first training of trainers of trauma-informed mediation. The team is comprised of volunteer mediators and psychotherapists, and Judith is the only experienced mediation trainer on the team. Judith exemplifies the best in volunteers giving from the heart. Thank you so much, Judith for your work and the work of your team in this important endeavor.

Thank you. And with that, we'll go ahead and move on then from public comment to our administrative agenda. Are there any items that we want to have pulled? Supervisor Lavagnino?

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction3:51 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Madam Chair I have A35.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:53 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Okay. Mr. Allen did you say that you wanted to make an announcement about one of them too?

0:03 – 0:065 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:59 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board. Yes I just have a quick clarification actually correction on the name on item A5 this is an item from Alcohol Drug and Mental Health Services to consider recommendations regarding contracts and contract amendments for adult mental health services for July 1 2012 through June 30 2013. On Item C it references Frank Burge MD for the contract and I just want to correct that that's Fred Burge I'm sorry, what? That name should read Fred Burge not Frank Burge on item C. I just wanted to clarify that for the record and then if you'd like to

move on to item A35. A35 is an appointment from Supervisor Labagnino. It's Travis Eugene Givens to the Human Services Commission.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:44 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Supervisor Lavagnino.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction4:45 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Thank you Madam Chair, I think during our last budget hearings we all expressed how important we felt the Human Services Commission is so this is a appointment that I didn't take lightly Mr. Gibbons is here today he's a former executive from the aerospace industry brings a wealth of experience and a very motivated attitude to assist us in human services commission so I just wanted to recognize him today and let him know that very appreciative of his service

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:12 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Great, thank you Mr. Gibbons we do appreciate your service. Alright any other items to be pulled from the administrative agenda? Otherwise, we'll go ahead and we'll go to our resolutions that need to be presented. The first one is our Resolution of Accommodation honoring Robert Roger Icola of the Public Defender's Office as our June 2012 County of Santa Barbara Employee of the Month. We're always so happy to do this to honor individuals in our county family as well as the departments that they represent And Mr. Icola is here, he's been in the Public Defender's Office since 1989. It sounds like he has handled every type of case that we can have and I'm sure that we will hear some more about it and his wonderful achievements in the resolution.

So perhaps I could have Mr. Ikola come forward? Is he here? Good morning, thank you for being here. And so we're going to have Mr. Allen read the resolution and then we'll present it.

0:06 – 0:124 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:23 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Thank you Madam Chair, members of the Board. Item A-1 is a resolution of commendation for Robert Roger Icola. He's a Santa Barbara County Employee of the Month for June 2012. Whereas Robert Roger Icola, a member of one of the pioneering families of the Central Coast and the Santa Maria Valley continues his family tradition of contributing to our community through their efforts in entrepreneurial agricultural medical and legal professions And whereas, Robert who many of us know as Ike or Bob Icola is a graduate of Ernest Righetti High School, the University of Southern California and the University of San Diego School of Law has been an attorney in the Santa Maria office of the Santa Barbara County Public Defender since 1989. And whereas, Robert has distinguished himself with vigorous and tireless advocate for clients represented by the public defender's office having represented clients in every type of case held by the public defender Felonies, misdemeanors, juvenile petitions, conservatorships, civil commitments and civil contempts.

And whereas because of his work ethic and skill Robert Acola has been entrusted with the task of representing clients charged with the most serious offenses that come before the Superior Court those carrying the death penalty where he has been devoting countless hours representing clients in two different cases who were initially charged with crimes carrying the death penalty And whereas, Robert has not only excelled in representing clients but has also demonstrated an aptitude for sharing those skills with the other lawyers in the office where his example of ethical representation and enthusiastic and dedicated approach to his work at the Public Defender's Office encourages those around him to achieve their highest level of competence.

And whereas, even with their tremendous responsibilities, Robert Roger Iacola assumes he makes time to spend with his wife Donna, his family, to make wine and to restore his classic MGP Roadster and remodel his home. Now therefore be it in this hereby ordered and resolved that the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors commends Robert Roger Iacola for his exceptional and continuous contributions to the work of Santa Barbara County by naming him as Employee of the Month for June 2012. Passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:39 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Thank you very much. I truly appreciate the recognition. I went to kindergarten here in Santa Maria, Main Street Elementary School that no longer exists. My parents bought my school clothes at Haslam's and I built my science project with devices and hardware bought from Bryant & Trott Hardware Store. My parents built a house with a fireplace from the Bradley Hotel Which I clearly remember.

I have a commitment to our community and Santa Barbara County. I've lived here all my life, since I was five years old. I plan on taking my last breath here in Santa Barbara County. Santa Barbara County and Santa Maria Valley is very important to me. And as a public defender, I have a commitment to justice It's the people of Santa Barbara County, and it's important to me to honor that commitment. My professional commitment and my ethical commitment as a resident of Santa Barbara County.

I think that the work that's required to be a public defender And the commitment involved is something that comes from an interest and values, and something that is actually bigger than ourselves. As public defenders we have a commitment to something that is bigger than ourselves. Something that is bigger than our relationship and our duty to our employer. I do everything I can to honor that commitment.

I could not do it but for the support of my wife and my family I put in more 55 and 60 hour weeks than I care to remember. And they have shared that commitment to our county with me by sacrificing their own time, their own lives. And I think that's important to remember. But I think the important thing today is that we need to remember and honor and respect the contribution of all the employees of the Public Defender's Office My fellow attorneys, staff and management share a common commitment to the system of justice and a commitment to ideas that are more important than ourselves.

And every employee of the Public Defender's Office works tirelessly And when the Public Defender's Office budget is cut, we do not work fewer hours. Our employees are overtime exempt. But it's their commitment to the ideals that we all share and their desire to contribute to Santa Maria Valley that keeps us going. It's a commitment that we're proud to make and a sacrifice that we're proud to give back to the community in Santa Barbara County And I love Santa Barbara County and I greatly respect all the employees of Santa Barbara County, particularly those in the Public Defender's Office who work tirelessly to make Santa Barbara County a better place.

And I respect and honor the commitment of their families who have given up their time Their spouses to work significant overtime, contributing to our community. And I think that kind of contribution although it's painful at the time that is made in the end it makes us all better people and I appreciate the opportunity to work for Santa Barbara County and I deeply thank you all.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role12:23 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you so very

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed12:24 · ≈ 9:12 AM

much.

0:12 – 0:176 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role12:34 · ≈ 9:12 AM

That was wonderful, thank you again. We're going to turn now to Supervisor Gray who's going to be presenting the next two resolutions. Supervisor Gray? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed12:42 · ≈ 9:12 AM

This resolution is so overdue I'm all but embarrassed. So Mike if you'll just read the beginning and then I want to talk a minute and then I'm gonna ask Don to come up here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:55 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board this is a resolution honoring Dawn Ward recipient of the Friends of Waller Park Arbor Day Award for 2012

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed13:04 · ≈ 9:13 AM

And we're talking about Arbor Day and Don and Friends of Waller Park. But what I want to say is Don has basically been the very beginning of the Friends of Waller Park before that, I mean there were no friends it was just one park commissioner And Don and a group of citizens got together and really made Friends of Waller Park what it is today. And that's huge, and he's still doing it.

But then he also single-handedly has kept our water rates really reasonable. So between those two things and just I think now enjoying life, I'm just excited to be able to recognize Don Ward and say to him again. Don, I am sorry that you didn't get this a long time ago because wow! So Michael if you'll read this, I will go up and present it to Don.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:00 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, this is a resolution honoring Don Ward, the recipient of the Friends of Waller Park Arbor Day Award for 2012. Don Ward has served for 25 years on the board of Friends of Waller Park and his leadership and dedication as chairman for the past 19 years has been instrumental in many improvements to the park. And whereas, among those improvements were the installation of four new children's play structures, a 27-hole disc golf course and the planting of more than 2,000 new trees adding beauty and shade to the park.

Don along with many other volunteers have contributed their time and efforts to hundreds of smaller projects in the park worth over half a million dollars. And whereas, Don is a charter member of the Central Coast Green Team, a nonprofit organization that works diligently to improve the environment of northern Santa Barbara County Don also served for 24 years on the Santa Barbara County APCD Hearing Board presiding as Chairman and Vice-Chairman on numerous occasions. And whereas, Don serves on the board of the Orkut Area Advisory Group working on land use and water issues which contributed to the development of the Orkut Community Plan As chairman of the Water Committee since 1992, Don has worked with the California Public Utilities Commission and the Division of Ratepayers Advocates to ensure that Orchid's private water company provides Orchid with clean safe water at a fair cost to the rate payers resulting in Orchids rates being one quarter of the cost of the city of Santa Maria for the same unit of water.

And whereas the Friends of Waller Park have presented Don Ward with the Friends of Waller Park Arbor Day Award for 2012 and are indebted to him for all he has done for Waller Park Now therefore be it ordered and resolved that the Board of Supervisors recognizes Don Ward for his dedication of time, hard work and service to his community and honors him as a recipient of the Friends of Waller Park Arbor Day Award for 2012. Passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed15:57 · ≈ 9:15 AM

I thank the Board of Supervisors for this great honor and specifically Supervisor Gray for presenting the resolution. I don't always agree with all the board's philosophies or decisions, but I know you all work hard and try to do the right thing and work for very little pay On the other hand, I deal with children's play structures as you noted and planting of hundreds of trees, thousands of trees.

Low price safe water for the orchid area and other interesting endeavors. I do this by choice as a volunteer and my pay is an abundance of joy and satisfaction. I respect the importance work that you do, but I wouldn't have your job for all the strawberries and all broccoli in Santa Maria Valley. I accept this award as a surrogate for the Friends of Walter Park Board of Supervisors and loyal membership And the many community supporters and volunteers.

You can't imagine how that is, the people year after year be members of the Waller Park community and our very small dues nine times out of ten people pay more than their dues to become a member I leave you with a Greek proverb that I quoted at the annual Arbor Day celebration. A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.

Please accept my deepest gratitude.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:17 – 0:198 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:52 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Thank you very

PresenterAndy CaldwellCOLABProposedself-stated17:53 · ≈ 9:17 AM

much.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction17:54 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Mr. Ward, Don, if you want to stay for a second. I wanted to pile on here a little bit. I've been going to Waller Park since, I think, I was in a stroller. Had great memories there, some not so great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed18:09 · ≈ 9:18 AM

You

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction18:11 · ≈ 9:18 AM

remember when they had the bird aviary sanctuary? I had a rabbit and my dad told me if I didn't clean the rabbit cage at home that's where he was gonna take her. He motivated me but... There was a time, I remember in the 70s when it wasn't... It was kind of a scary place to go and we stayed away from it for a while. And I just really want to thank the friends at Waller Park because you've turned it around again to where great place for me to take my family. I know you're all volunteers and I just wanted to say thank you on behalf of my family and all the residents of Santa Maria. You guys do a great job.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed18:47 · ≈ 9:18 AM

I appreciate that. One of the things we did early on was to have a family day in the park and our goal was never to make money on that, it was just to get the people back in to understand that the park is safe as it became more and more beautiful so everybody come to stay in the park And I think we have a real leg up now that we have a CEO named Waller.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role19:21 · ≈ 9:19 AM

There you go. All right, thank you. All right. Why don't we go ahead then? Supervisor Gray, is Ms. Flagg here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed19:30 · ≈ 9:19 AM

You know, Ms. Flagg isn't here. It's a resolution she just called last night and said she had to attend the funeral of a close friend. But just to basically thank Ms. Flagg for being kind of the center of Orcutt. She has a wonderful restaurant in Orcuttt It's kind of the place that everybody goes to talk about what's going on. So it's just a recognition, I'll take it by the restaurant and maybe get a free cup of coffee.

0:19 – 0:245 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role19:57 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Alright, well with that why don't we go ahead and approve the administrative agenda. Motion? Second? All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries. We've had a request for public comment and since we didn't really have one before from the public I'll go ahead and honor that before we begin our departmental agenda. Mr. Caldwell

PresenterAndy CaldwellCOLABProposedself-stated20:29 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Somebody may want to try to catch Don or you're still here. You forgot your resolution.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed20:35 · ≈ 9:20 AM

I thought I'd leave it for you.

PresenterAndy CaldwellCOLABProposedself-stated20:39 · ≈ 9:20 AM

I don't get too many of those. Madam Chair, members of the board, I'm Andy Caldwell representing COLAB. I want to talk with you in retrospect about the budget hearings I've realized that there's not a whole lot of people that show up unless they have one incredibly important item to them, like last week or this year it was the alcohol drug and mental health issues or the veteran service which can pack out a room.

And I know every once in awhile you might have Occasional gap flight that wants to take up 30 minutes of your day. And so I understand that there's a limit to how much time you can afford to public comment, but I don't think there's a limit to how much time you can afford for deliberation. In years past, I've always been frustrated that this is the one time of the year When you really do set the policy via allocation of dollars that spends $800 million of taxpayer money, $800 million and you guide the workload of nearly 4,000 employees for the year.

And we've always felt that you should spend more time and years ago I impressed upon the board the idea Visiting one department at a time per week and really digging deep into what they did, how they did it. How they staffed it? Who paid for it? Whether their performance measures really told you anything meaningful? And the board did it! But they were sabotaged by what I'm going to call the proverbial dog and pony show, where the staff showed up and just gave a cursory overview.

Showed the positive things they were doing but there really wasn't any scrutiny. CoLab years ago, the first five or six years we were around, we didn't read the budget and I didn't go to the budget hearings. A, because I couldn't understand them they were more like financial reports than a performance based budget but when we found out back then that the county couldn't afford Public safety, because back then we needed a county jail. The roads and bridges and streets were backlogged maintenance. And there were other problems. We started saying well if you can't afford these basics what are you spending your money on? And that's why we started reading the budget. I was a former manager with a couple hundred employees When we were having a hard time making payroll and paying the bills, we started scrutinizing everything we've done or we were doing.

We still have not seen that level of scrutiny from this board or any of the ones previous. And I think it's a function of time, patience and hard work. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role23:57 · ≈ 9:23 AM

All right, we'll now go back and we'll start our departmental agenda. And the first item comes from the County Executive Office and presentation by Ms. Mosvissage. Mr. Allen if you read that into the record please?

0:24 – 0:318 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:13 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board, Item 1 is from the County Executive Office it's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding AB 1500 and AB 1501 the Middle Class Scholarship Act

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed24:25 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Good morning. Good morning, Madam Chair and members of the board. This item is on your agenda today for consideration of a position on AB 1500 and its companion legislation, AB 1501. At the June 4 legislative committee staff was requested to bring this item before the full board as it does not directly pertain to the legislative principles and platform previously adopted by the board The bills before you were authored by Assembly Speaker John Perez. However, I should also note that they were also co-authored by a number of Assemblymen as well as Senators including Assemblyperson Doss Williams.

Dawes-Williams, Assemblyperson Dawes Williams has requested that the Board of Supervisors formally review this item and take a position as well. Passage of the bill while revenue neutral requires a two third majority in each house therefore broad based support from local government education and business is important to the author. Let me go back real quick I'll go through each bill very quickly. AB 1500, as part of the 910 budget package a $1 billion tax and corporation tax apportionment break was provided to out-of-state corporations by allowing them to choose the most advantageous tax formula This resulted in an economic disadvantage to California and various businesses, including or discouraging production and hiring outside of the state.

This resulted in a $1 billion loss in tax revenue to the State of California. Since 2003-4, state budget challenges and the inability to increase revenue have caused higher education fees including a 145% increase for UC students and a 191% increase for Cal State University students. The Legislative Analyst's Office in a report dated January 6 stated that the fiscal effects of a mandatory single sales tax factor apportionment formula, which is not in effect now, would result in about a $1 billion revenue increase by fiscal year 2013-14 and in effect close the tax loop that was created in 2009-10.

The Franchise Tax Board also estimates that moving to a mandatory single sales tax factor effective January 1, 2012 would increase general fund revenues by $1 billion for 13-14 compared to the existing law. AB 1500 closes the $1 billion corporate tax benefit to out-of-state and multinational corporations, and deposits the revenue in a middle class scholarship fund account to use to finance, which I will discuss in a moment, the Middle Class Scholarship Act.

AB 1500 revises the rules that determines whether a corporate taxpayer is in fact doing business within the state of California. And as noted, makes the single sales tax factor mandatory. Presently, multi-state and multinational corporations functioning within the State of California are only required to pay a proportion of their overall taxing to the State of California. So basically, corporations can choose which tax apportioned method benefits them most. Which then results in the unfortunate loss of tax revenue to the state.

In terms of AB 1501, this acknowledges existing law that the UC system and the Cal State system may require mandatory system-wide fees to be paid by students in these institutions. It establishes the middle class scholarship program under the administration of the Student Aid Commission. Further, it provides that commencing with the 12-13 academic year or this fall undergraduate students enrolled in the UC or CSU system would receive a scholarship award that combined with other financial aid received by an eligible student would be at least two thirds of the amount charged to students for mandatory system wide fees in an academic year.

A student will be eligible for the scholarship if they meet the following conditions. The annual household income could not exceed $150,000 and a student is a resident of the state or exempt from paying non-resident tuition. In addition, it provides that a student whose annual household income exceeds $150,000 but does not exceed $160,000 and would otherwise meet requirements would receive scholarship that is reduced by 10% for each $1,000 by which his or her annual household income exceeds $150,000.

In addition, it would appropriate $150 million from the Middle Class Scholarship Fund to the Chancellor of Community Colleges for allocation to community college districts based on calculations for full-time equivalent students. AB 1501 would only become operative if AB 1500 takes effect in the 2011-12 regular session. Also, AB 1501 stipulates that this legislation is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute and AB 1501 is double joined with AB 1500 requiring both bills to be passed and signed into law by Governor Brown for the middle class scholarship act to become law.

A couple of the key concepts as I mentioned, it addresses families with incomes less than $150,000. It reduces the total fees within the UC system and the Cal State system by approximately two-third. And where I note that its costs are one billion per year, it's actually revenue neutral. The cost of the program is one billion per year but the taxes that would be generate from the change to single sales tax factor would be one billion a year. And as noted it modifies the single sales tax factor formula for out-of-state corporations.

Those in support of this legislation include the University of California, the City of Los Angeles and the City of Berkeley. CSAC is currently looking at this bill. And those in opposition include the Coalition of Employers Against Higher Taxes which is comprised of Chrysler Corporation, General Motors, International Paper and Kimberly-Clark. In addition multiple chambers of commerce, the California Chamber of Commerce as opposed to this bill.

The recommendation is to consider whether to take a position on AB 1500 and 1501, and direct staff to communicate the board's position to the California State Legislative Delegation. I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you Ms. Nisich. Any questions

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role31:10 · ≈ 9:31 AM

from the Board?

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction31:11 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Supervisor Wolk? Thank you Madam Chair. Ms. Nissich, you mentioned $150 million going to community colleges So that is, that's not a scholarship piece. That's directly to community colleges to help fund them?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed31:29 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Yes Madam Chair and Supervisor Wolff, that is the case. It goes directly in apportioned to the junior colleges. All right thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role31:36 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Any other questions? Okay well I believe we have two public speakers Mr. Allen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:43 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Yes Madam Chair we have two requests to speak. We'll start in Santa Barbara with Hilary Blackerby followed by Andy Caldwell here in Santa Maria.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role31:51 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Good morning Miss Blackerby.

0:31 – 0:406 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed31:55 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Thank you so much, Supervisor Farr and Board. I want to thank you for taking this item up. Thank you to Ms. Misich for explaining all the intricacies of it but the bottom line is and she mentioned this UC fees which definitely affect your constituents have increased by 145% since 2003-2004 school year As you have experienced, having a large UC in your district, in your county, it's really changed the face of who is able to afford higher education in our community. Currently, we can talk about percentages but to go to a UC the system-wide fees are $12,192 a year which for some of you who went to UCs when it was nearly free is kind of a shock to the system.

We do think that this fixing the single sales factor will level the playing field for California companies. Note that the companies that are opposed are all out-of-state companies who benefit from taking jobs out of the state, the way it's currently set up and I know there were only three Entities listed as support, but I have pages and pages of organizations.

Companies Qualcomm recently signed on Cisco California companies in California community groups that are extremely supportive of this and see how important it could be. Also, looking on a local level what this could mean for UC students or CSU students at Channel Islands or community college students. It could mean that instead of leaving school with staggering debt and having to move back home or to LA or to the Bay Area or out-of-state they would actually be able to stay here because of the high cost of living, stay here and give back to the community I'm The work of making community colleges more affordable. I'm happy to answer any questions that anyone might have, and thanks again for taking us up.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role34:34 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Thank you. All right? Mr. Caldwell. Mr. Caldwell.

PresenterAndy CaldwellCOLABProposedself-stated34:45 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board. Who pays taxes? Who's going to pay that $1 billion? Do corporations pay taxes or do consumers pay taxes? Do you think that those corporations are going to take a billion dollars out of their bottom line profit, or they're gonna raise their prices and you just instituted a tax hike to all consumers in the state of California that for instance buy cars.

When was, you know, you guys have gone through four years of fiscal bloodbath due to pensions, salaries and benefits. Have you read one headline at the UC or Cal State system doing the same? How are they doing on their pension crises? Do you know that they quit paying into their pension fund a number of years ago and that their pension losses in deficit at one time was $20 billion just the UC Do you think maybe you need more information as to whether or not the taxpayers and the students are actually being asked to continue to supplement salaries, benefits and pensions through the Cal State College system because they've not made or instituted any meaningful reforms?

Do you think the state of California needs yet one more dedicated tax revenue that ties up the legislature from being able to prioritize where their biggest needs are? That the money's generated here automatically goes there and nobody could say anything about how that money is spent. Is that how would you guys like that? You don't really when you think about it in terms of how much your budget is dictated by the state and federal government, and you have very little control over those programs.

The bottom line here is I ran this by two or three people. Nobody could explain to me exactly what the difference is in who's being taxed now and who's going to be taxed later, and what the difference is. Can't explain it. I'd love to give you a true false test right now to see if you could. But the bottom line, a billion dollar increase in taxes is going to be paid by California consumers A and B. You don't have any information up here as how this money is gonna be spent and whether it's being spent wisely.

We think it's amazing that those college students have protested the fee increases, but have never been told why the fees are going through the roof. And we all know the number one cost driver right now in government at every level in California is unfunded pension debt. And until they start doing some of the reforms that you've done and some of them that Jerry Brown is asking for, we're telling them no more money.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role37:51 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Thank you, Mr. Caldwell. Supervisor Lavinino?

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction37:54 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Thank you Madam Chair I as a parent of somebody that recently graduated from the UC system I do find the fees exorbitant and somewhat ridiculous but to address it in this manner to me is one of the problems that I see with Sacramento is that you know we have in Sacramento they run through thousands of bills on a single day because they put everything off and they don't really have time to analyze I think Mr. Caldwell brought up a good point, is that this is a complicated tax shift when you're talking about billion with a B it would be nice to have more than five minutes to figure out if I want to put my name on something like this although he made it very easy for me this morning when I read the Santa Barbara News Press under the headline UC system faces mounting pension costs and it did talk about that A UC Berkeley economist, his quote was the Regents made a serious error and the legislature made a serious error by not putting money aside for almost 20 years while accumulating an obligation.

They have almost roughly 10 billion in unfunded liability. They pointed out that there were over 2,000 UC retirees drawing annual pensions over 100,000, 57 with pensions over 200,000 and then a few additional with over 300,000. The number of UC retirees collecting six-figure pinches increased by 30% over the past two years. So, the cost of a college education is being placed on the student And until UC and CSU system take a stand and figure out a way to get their costs under control, I see no reason for me to support trying for them to deflect some of this onto business.

I don't know if that's a good idea of trying to get the single tax structure I don't have enough to go on that might actually, you know be an idea down the road but as far as for the money to go to the UC system through this tax increase until they get pension reform. I'm not interested in supporting something like this.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role40:07 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Thank You Supervisor Levin.

0:40 – 0:4823 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:11 · ≈ 9:40 AM

To point the problem out with what we're looking at here, it's convoluted and complicated to the point that it's almost unenforceable or undeterminable. And the one good idea is to look at and redefine the corporate tax law that pertains to single source Factor but we but we're not doing this. We're starting there and then going into dedicated as to where it goes And then we have to set up a commission that determines who qualifies for getting Those dollars that maybe come from the single source It's just simply not workable. It's kind of one of those things where you compile complicated unclear ideas together because a I've certainly would like to see Help to the college level. It would be great if it could be back to the same price that it was when we went to college I would like to see this this corporate tax that pertains to the single sales factor change so that we can control that flight But this is just not the mechanism by which to do it

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role41:16 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Thank You supervisor great supervisor

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction41:17 · ≈ 9:41 AM

wolf, thank you madam chair When you sat on the Ledge Committee, did you have any public comments? I'm just curious how that all happened. Ms. Ensic,

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role41:30 · ≈ 9:41 AM

I don't recall that we did. We had some people there to speak to some other items but not particularly to this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed41:38 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Warpe, I believe that Hillary Blackerby again from Assemblywoman Williams' office did speak to this item. Okay.

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction41:48 · ≈ 9:41 AM

I'll just make a few comments. Interesting, because I read the same article that Supervisor Labagnino referred to and I do think that article pointed out some serious missteps from the Regents in not paying or having their employees pay into the retirement system for 20 years. I think that's quite unfortunate and likely one of the issues that is causing increase in fees right now although most likely not the only issue.

I also read today in the Los Angeles Times about problems in the community college, and we hear that in our own local community college. And I have not heard the same issues related to pension as it relates to community colleges. But I think to put the entire blame on our higher education system Pensions is unfair or not accurate. I do think it's a piece of what the state is dealing with.

Regardless, the burden is falling on our students and parents. And I think that this is an opportunity to provide students with scholarship funds to get them into higher education. I have found it so incredibly stunning that we, as a state, have spent so much time and money in our K-12 system to get students prepared and ready to go to college And yet by the time they get there, we basically put up the gates. Either there's not enough money for classes or there's not enough money for kids to actually go to college and I think it's quite unfortunate so I support this. I think this is a positive move to help students to move forward in their education. And I am pleased to say that it does incorporate something for our community colleges.

Thank you.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role44:08 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Wolff. Ms. Nesich, what is the timing of this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed44:17 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Madam Chair, this is an urgency item. It is scheduled to go with the rest of the budget trailer bills because it does address the fiscal components so it will likely be re-heard this week. It did I believe have a hearing yesterday as well and it did not come up on the Legislative Analyst's Office what the outcome of that was but I would anticipate that it would be heard this week in accordance with the budget Okay, and you said

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role44:45 · ≈ 9:44 AM

that CSAC was looking at it. Are we anticipating that they would take a position on it in time to have any effect one way or the other since the discussions are already ongoing?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed44:55 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Yes Madam Chair I did check in with CSAC yesterday. They have been looking at the bill. I don't have any update at this point on an official letter of opposition or support.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role45:06 · ≈ 9:45 AM

Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed45:06 · ≈ 9:45 AM

thank you

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role45:08 · ≈ 9:45 AM

Well, you know I have to say that I agree with all of my colleagues. You know that it is unfortunate that the Regents have not handled their fiscal matters in the way they should, particularly the pension issue. And it is something they do have to grapple with. At the same time, it seems very unfair now to place all of that onto the shoulders of these students who are struggling and certainly Having UC Santa Barbara in my district and working with the student population every week, I see the real face of this.

And I also am a graduate of the Cal State system. I have two nieces that have gone through it and seen the marked difference from when I was a student and they were students The families are struggling with these enormous increases that are happening in rapid succession. I, you know, have children and friends of my children that are trying to go to community college and as we know the summer session at CC was hanging by a thread and may be the last year for that so these are very real and immediate impacts that are going on You know we have more and more out of state and foreign students in our UC system. I'm a very big believer in that, I was a foreign student myself at one point in time but you know this whole system was designed to take care of the educational needs for the children of the State of California so It's really unfortunate to see that so many spaces are not there for them now because of the cost.

In any event, you know I would support this it looks like we're split here on the board so I don't know that a motion one way or the other is going to be successful Supervisor

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction47:04 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Wolfe. Yeah, just to get this on the record I will move recommendations well not that we consider that we take a favorable position of support position on the two items before us and direct staff to communicate that position to the county state legislative delegation.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:27 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Okay and I'll second

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction47:31 · ≈ 9:47 AM

And as part of discussion, I do want to say that, you know... Well, I'm not going to say anything.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:39 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Okay. So we will go ahead and have a roll call vote. Mr. Allen? Mr. Laganino?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed47:44 · ≈ 9:47 AM

No.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:45 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Ms.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed47:46 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Wolk?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:46 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed47:47 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Ms Gray? No Ms. Farb? Aye The motion fails 2-2.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:52 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Thank you. Thank you, Ms. Nusich Okay, and we will go ahead and go to our second departmental item. Mr. Holland when you're ready if you'll read that into the record. And it looks like the rest of the hearing is all public works. Thank You Mr. McLaughlin for being here and so many many members of your staff

0:48 – 0:5410 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:13 · ≈ 9:48 AM

Madam Chair, members of the board. Item number two is from Public Works and the Board of Directors in Laguna County Sanitation District. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a Laguna County Sanitation District Board ordinance adopting service charges connection fees and trunk line fees and resolution relative to the collection of service charges on the tax roll third and fourth and fifth districts. I would also just like to note for the record that our office has not received any protests related to this matter. Okay thank you.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction48:43 · ≈ 9:48 AM

Good morning, Madam Chair and Board Members. Thank you, Madam Chair as you mentioned the next five items this morning come from Public Works. The first three relate to the fees we charge and assessments levied on an annual basis to our customers or the communities that we serve. And the last two are our annual maintenance plans from both Flood Control And from transportation. So our first presenter this morning for the Laguna County Sanitation District rates and fees for 12-13 is Marty Wilder, our Utilities Manager.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role49:15 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Good morning Mr. Wilder

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed49:16 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Good morning Madam Chair, members of the Board. The Laguna County Sanitation District is a dependent district created in 1958. Provides wastewater services to Orcutt and unincorporated Santa Maria. Operates under various permits including the regional board issued for the plant and disposal well that's used for brine disposal by EPA. State Water Board has issued a sewer system collection A permit and then various APCD permits for air emissions.

And the district's mission, of course, is to conserve and protect resources. The annual rates and fee ordinance was noticed publicly pursuant to Prop 218 in which a mailer was sent to district customers including mobile homes. Also the hearing dates were published in the summary of time pursuant to the government code requirements and as Mr. Allen indicated there have been no written responses to date Sewer charge rates pay for annual operation, maintenance, replacement and reserve costs. They're collected on the tax roll and this year is proposed to be at 11%.

This will allow for necessary plan upgrades as identified in the master plan presented to the board last October. The master plan assessed condition of the plant and looked at future needs, infrastructure needs. Reviewed current expected regulatory criteria, compared different treatment and discharge alternatives, and broke down any improvements into two phases. Phase one is to replace and improve existing equipment whereas phase two was to address future capacity needs based on anticipated development. It also evaluated costs and revenue needs to achieve these projects.

The proposed sewer charge based on a residential unit equivalent for this year is $653.99. Last year it was $589.18. This is an annual increase of $64.81, which is an equivalent of $5.40 per month. The multiple family residential rate is based on 90% of the residential unit equivalent schools institutional facilities are at $34.13 per capita per year and commercial customers are based on flow and load How the district compares countywide. This slide shows various treatment technologies that are used by what agency and the district is at the lower part of the tertiary treatment agencies at $54.50 per month, and the remainder show the other agencies and their treatment technologies as well as the average at about $50.14 per month.

Total water cost comparison is shown here, which includes an estimated annual usage for water and a water bill. The Laguna County Sanitation District coupled with Golden State Water Company is at $86.96 and the countywide average is $103.30. Developer impact fees, these are paid by development for sewer system equity buy-in. We have trunkline fees and connection fees. The trunkline fees are to pay for collection system improvements whereas the connection fees fund treatment and disposal improvement.

The developer MPEC fees we have are adjusted based on indices that have been adopted by ordinances or agreements. Based on the master plan, we have a new baseline connection fee proposed at $6,302 per residential unit equivalent The two trunk line fees we have in place are the Dutard trunk line fee which is proposed to increase by 0.9% based on a construction cost index at $894 per residential unit equivalent and the Bradley-Selman Trunk Sewer Line which is based on the prime rate at 3 1⁄4 percent increase or $2,062 per residential unit equivalent. Therefore today's recommendations are to conduct the first Reading today to consider adoption and hear the report and also to consider adoption at the next hearing to adopt the 1213 rates.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role53:25 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Thank you Mr. Wilder, Supervisor Lavagnino.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction53:27 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Thank You Madam Chair just a quick question why are there two what causes the difference between the Dutard and the Bradley? Why are the fee structures so different?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed53:36 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Rodman here. The difference in cost is based on the actual capital costs to build those two facilities. The Dutard trunk line is also spread out over a much larger number of customers whereas the Bradley trunk line is upstream and doesn't quite serve as many customers.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role53:53 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Thank you. Any other questions for Mr. Wilder right now? Mr. Allen do we have any public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:58 · ≈ 9:53 AM

No request to speak.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role54:00 · ≈ 9:54 AM

All right well so then we'll keep it here at the board if there are no other questions I'll entertain a motion Comments? Motion from Supervisor Lavagnino. Do I have a second? Second from Supervisor Gray, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries thank you very much good job okay we'll move on to departmental agenda item number three

0:54 – 1:0421 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed54:29 · ≈ 9:54 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board, I am Therese from Public Works. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding rates and fees related to Santa Barbara County solid waste operations for fiscal year 2012-2013. Madam

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction54:42 · ≈ 9:54 AM

Chair, next up from Public Works is our solid waste tipping fees collection rates and parcel fees in Cuyama for fiscal year 12-13 and we're asking your board today to approve two resolutions. And our presenter today will be Miss Leslie Wells, Resource Recovery Manager.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role54:58 · ≈ 9:54 AM

Okay, thank you. And it's not just for Cuyama right? It's for other unincorporated areas?

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction55:04 · ≈ 9:55 AM

The parcel fees specifically are for Cuiyama.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role55:06 · ≈ 9:55 AM

Okay, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed55:08 · ≈ 9:55 AM

Good morning Ms. Wells. Good morning Madam Chair and members of the board I have a fairly brief presentation today basically we have three categories of solid waste rates the first category are tipping fees that are charged at County Solid Waste Management Facilities. The second are collection rates that are charged by our franchisees that have an exclusive right to collect solid waste from residents and businesses in the unincorporated areas. The third category of rates are, as Mr. McGaulpin mentioned, the parcel fees that are only in the Cuyama Valley.

So for the first category under the tipping fees at county solid waste facilities, probably the most noteworthy increase is we're proposing an increase for trash from $72.25 to $77 per ton. at the Tahecus Landfill. This proposed increase is consistent with the reserve policy that was approved by your board in 2007. These increases are necessary due to capital costs related to expansion activities that are currently being, or ongoing at the Tahecus Landfill. Those are going to cost approximately $36 million when we're done with that project And coupled with that is we're seeing reduced tons being landfilled over the last five years. So as a result of that, we're needing to increase our per ton fee.

We have tried to offset some of these cost increases by implementing a few cost-saving measures. Last year we reduced the hours of operation both at the Tahecus Landfill and the San Yanez Recycling and Transfer Station. We're also trying to internalize work that the county employees are doing rather than contracting that work out On the second category of fees are the collection rates. As I mentioned, these are for the franchisees that are under contract by the county to provide collection services to residents and businesses only in the unincorporated areas of the county. These rate changes are going to vary depending on the location of the service being provided as well as the type of service. There's two factors affecting these rates those are CPI adjustments that are built in as a right in our individual contracts, as well as any proposed changes in disposal or processing tipping fees.

So specific to the CPI adjustment, our two older agreements are in zones one and three. That is calculated by looking at the difference between indices in February of 2011 versus February 2012 resulting in a CPI increase of 2.1%. In our more recent agreements we modified how the CPI would be calculated looking instead At the average monthly difference between those same reference months and that has resulted in a 1.3% increase.

So, the change that's going to affect only the disposal portion of the rates is due to the increased tipping fees at each of the three landfills within the county. As you can see Santa Maria is proposing an increase from 69 So what does this mean to our rate payer? We took a More popular service level, which is a 60-gallon trash including recycling and green waste.

So what you're going to see on average is about a 2.24% Montecito. Well rather than going through them all it's basically a range of 1.67% in the Santa Maria Valley so that would be Orchid area up to a high of about 2.64% in the San Ynez Valley On the commercial side, you'll see the range of 1.41% in the Lompoc Valley up to 3.79% in San Ynez Valley. So lastly, our third category is the parcel fee. This is the only portion of the county where we assess a parcel fee for solid waste management services.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed59:47 · ≈ 9:59 AM

Could I ask a question before we... I kind of wanted to go back to where you talked about a reduced volume at the landfills because of costs and have you So it costs more, so they're using them less. And then that reflects in the rate payers' rate? Is that what we're saying?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:00:10 · ≈ 10:00 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Gray, actually what we're seeing is it's largely because of the economy and this is something we're seeing nationwide is the volume of waste that's being landfilled has been going down since about 2008 So with reference to the cost, my point there was we have a large amount of fixed costs due to our expansion effort at the Tejigas landfill. So now we have fewer tons to divide that cost over. So it isn't necessarily that people are generating less trash because it costs more to dispose of it. I think they're buying less material so they're generating less trash and now we have fewer tons to spread those costs over.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:00:58 · ≈ 10:00 AM

So that, and that's the case throughout all of the three landfills. So that Lompoc, Santa Maria and Teguas are all having that same experience.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:01:09 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Supervisor Gray? Yes. And they're seeing it actually statewide and nationwide.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:01:14 · ≈ 10:01 AM

And so that accounts for the reason that the Santa Maria and the Lompoc transfers to or dumps landfills. I can't get over our experience increase.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:01:28 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Gray. I can't speak specifically to their facilities. I would certainly think that that would be a factor. I know some of those landfills like the City of Santa Maria landfill has a newer revenue stream accepting the contaminated soil as a cover material so really it depends on the facility and what's happening on the revenue side versus the cost but if it was a status static status quo situation where you didn't have a new revenue stream, then they would be experiencing sort of the same situation where they had fewer times to spread those costs over.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:02:04 · ≈ 10:02 AM

And I'm trying to make the connection so if there's like it says Santa Maria Valley 1.67% increase rate for the ratepayer that's the guy that has trash can out at the curb and that is because of the increase in tipping charges And what

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:02:26 · ≈ 10:02 AM

else? Supervisor Gray, there's two components to every trash rate. One component is the cost for the hauler to collect material from your home. So that includes the cost of running the trucks, the drivers, the containers. That portion of the rate is being increased by the CPI and in The orchid case, that's an increase of 1.3% for the collection portion of the rate. Now the other portion of the rate is what does it cost to get rid of this material? And so that portion of the rate is going to be impacted by the increase that Samarie is proposing at their landfill tipping fee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:03:08 · ≈ 10:03 AM

Thank you. Thank you Chair.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:03:12 · ≈ 10:03 AM

You're welcome. All right Ms. Wells why don't you go ahead and continue then.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:03:16 · ≈ 10:03 AM

So specific to the Kiyama parcel fees, this is the only area where we do assess a parcel fee to cover the cost of operating. We have two very small scale transfer stations one in Yukiyama and one in Venticopa. The fee is $77 per year per single family dwelling. We're not recommending a change in this fee for next fiscal year. So our recommendations to you today is to adopt both resolutions. The first is to set the fee schedule for what we can charge at our county facilities and the second, what the franchise callers can charge for their collection services. The second resolution is to approve the parcel fee schedule for Nuku'yama.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:04:01 · ≈ 10:04 AM

All right, thank you. Do we have any other questions from the board for Ms. Wells at this time? Mr. Allen do we have any public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:04:09 · ≈ 10:04 AM

No request to speak.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:04:10 · ≈ 10:04 AM

Okay. We'll bring it back to the board then. Supervisor

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:04:12 · ≈ 10:04 AM

Wolk? Thank You Ms. Wells for your presentation. The fees at New Quiama if they were to go up what would be the actual fee that would cover the cost or is it close to the $77,000?

1:04 – 1:0711 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:04:30 · ≈ 10:04 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Wolf. No, the $77 per single family dwelling does not cover the cost to provide the services. What we have done in the past is try to reduce costs through operating those transfer stations on a more limited level. We've also worked with Marburg who is currently servicing those transfer stations And they were able to decrease their costs about $50,000 per year.

My understanding and I would have to check again with our accounting department is that we're operating at a deficit of over $100,000 per year at those facilities.

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:05:15 · ≈ 10:05 AM

So is it fair to say that the residents, the other residents in the county are subsidizing that? Or is the hauler... Who is subsidizing that difference?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:05:34 · ≈ 10:05 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Wolff. At this time We are paying for that deficit through program fees that are collected in the North County. So it would be the rate payers that are receiving service in the northern part of the county. We also, depending on the market but if there's excess recyclables revenues then that is used to cover the costs to operate those facilities. It is a very remote location and it is a situation where it's needing a subsidy in order to operate

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:06:10 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Yes, it sounds that way. OK. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:06:20 · ≈ 10:06 AM

So just to continue on that line of questioning Ms. Wells at some point in time the solution is going to be to have to go to the voters in Quiama to increase that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:06:36 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Madam Chair, that is what we have been advised by County Council in the past. We need to revisit that with them I know case law associated with Prop 218 probably changes But we have been advised in the past it would be subject to a vote of folks that are currently receiving that service Okay, thank you

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:06:57 · ≈ 10:06 AM

All right Mr. Allen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:58 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Madam Chair, I'd just like to also note that our office did not receive any protests related to this matter

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:07:04 · ≈ 10:07 AM

Okay Thank You All right. With that, I guess we're ready to conclude this item. Somebody want to make any other comments or make a motion? Supervisor Lavagnino, you're correct. I think we're A, B and C And the notice of exemption. Okay, do we have a motion? Do we have a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:41 · ≈ 10:07 AM

Second.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:07:43 · ≈ 10:07 AM

All right all those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries thank you very much All right, moving right along. We'll have item number four.

1:08 – 1:1419 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:00 · ≈ 10:08 AM

Madam Chair and members of the Board, Item 4 is brought to the board by Public Works in acting as the Board of Directors of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the flood benefit assessment program for fiscal year 2012-13

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:08:15 · ≈ 10:08 AM

Madam Chair, this is our first hearing today for the ordinance to adopt the benefit assessments for flood control purposes for next fiscal year. And our second reading is scheduled for July 10th. Our presenter today Mr. Tom Farrum, Deputy of Flood Control.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:08:30 · ≈ 10:08 AM

Good morning Mr. Farrum thank you for being here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:08:32 · ≈ 10:08 AM

Good morning madam chair members of the board thank you very much As your board knows each year we come before you to update our annual assessments, property assessments for the Flood Control District. You recall these assessments are all voter approved assessments and one feature of these assessments is an annual cost-of-living increase CPI adjustment to preserve the funding levels for the activities of flood control district.

This particular year, our proposed increase is 2.2% as detailed by the cost of living CPI index that we use. The proposed benefit assessment rates are shown on page four of your staff report and also shown here. In particular, you'll note that in group C these are the assessments for a single family dwelling per year so these range anywhere from a low of just under $3 in San Ynez to just over $22 on the South Coast and again these assessment rates are per year for single-family dwelling. For other land uses are the other groups going anywhere from commercial down to agriculture.

Madam Chair, as Mr. McAulpin mentioned we're requesting approval of items A, B and C as the first reading today. We will be returning to your board on July 10th on the admin agenda for the second reading and ultimate approval. And with that I'd be happy to answer any questions you have.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:09:57 · ≈ 10:09 AM

Okay. Questions for Mr. Farron? Go ahead Supervisor.

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:10:05 · ≈ 10:10 AM

I don't have a question. I just have a comment, Mr. Faber. The Flood Control District is so important to our community and the safety of our residents. And the work that you do and the outreach that you perform is outstanding, and I know in my district there are a lot of areas that are impacted and receive the benefit of this benefit assessment. And I think when we tax our rate payers To see the improvements on the ground as we do and to see the outline of the work that you're going to be doing is outstanding. And I have always appreciated your response when we've had constituent concerns on some of the creek beds, so just want to thank you and your staff for a lot of tremendous work. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:10:59 · ≈ 10:10 AM

Thank you. Supervisor Frank?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:01 · ≈ 10:11 AM

I'd like to go back to benefit assessment map that shows where the different assessments are and basically just take a few moments and identify where there is an assessed area. And I assume that shows up in one's tax bill.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:11:23 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Madam Chair, Supervisor Gray you're exactly right. On this map you'll see what we call the operating area of the Flood Control District. These colors get a little blurred but the colored areas are what are called flood zones or zone of benefit these are the zones where these assessments are assessed they show up on your tax bill as a line item you can actually see them right on your tax bill and those funds are collected in those zones and they are spent in those zones only

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:52 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Just briefly, what are the zones Mr. Fairam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:11:56 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Okay you're going to test me here there's ten of them let me see if I can do it so we have roughly the South Coast flood zone that extends from Carpinteria out to Gaviota. The San Ynez flood zone that goes from Kachuma Dam to west of Buellton The Lompoc Valley Flood Zone, which goes from just west of Buellton almost to the ocean exclusive of Vandenberg Air Force Base and exclusive of the City of Lompoc. The City of Lompok has a separate flood zone which you can really not tell but it's right in there.

The Los Alamos Flood Zone, which basically is the entire Los Alamos Valley down to the Barkas Slough which then becomes Vandenberg Air Force property The Orchid Flood Zone which extends basically from Betteravia here to the south, to the ridge line where it intersects with Los Alamos flood zone. The Santa Maria flood zone which is a little wider than the city of Santa Maria but basically the city of Santa Maria or from Betteravia to the north.

The Guadalupe flood zone which covers most of the west valley of the Santa Maria Valley. The Bradley Flood Zone, which is the eastern part of the Santa Maria Valley, say from Lake Maria Estates to the east. And then there's another zone, very important zone, which overlays some of these zones, which is the Santa Maria River Levee Maintenance Zone, which covers the northern part of the Santa Maria Valley, which assesses for work on the Santa Maria River Levee. I think I got them all.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:13:28 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Thank you. Okay. Mr. Farrum, if somebody was moving into the area and they had a friend that had flooding problems that lived in Santa Barbara County, how would they go about finding out of the properties they were looking at whether they had had problems with flooding in the past?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:13:53 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Madam Chair, I think there's two ways that they could do. Certainly they could call our office. We have a number of reports over the years from 1995 on up where we have had major flooding episodes and we've tried to document that flooding. If they're going to buy a piece of property, they are required by law to disclose that. The buyer has to disclose it if it has been flooded. And then lastly, on our online website you can actually look up and determine if you're in a FEMA flood zone. You can actually go in online and enter that address and then that would tell you if you're in the FEMA 100-year flood zone map which may or may not tell you whether the property actually has flooded or not but that would tell you if you need to buy flood insurance at that time.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:14:34 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Okay, so all you would need is an address. You don't necessarily need an APN number.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:38 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Madam Chair, an address is all you

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:14:40 · ≈ 10:14 AM

need. That's great. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Allen? Public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:14:46 · ≈ 10:14 AM

No requests.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:14:47 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Okay. So we'll have a motion. Supervisor Wolk? I'll

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:14:53 · ≈ 10:14 AM

move this item.

Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Janet Wolf · Seconded by Joni Gray
Show transcript
Okay, motion by Supervisor Wolf. Second. Second by Supervisor Gray. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries thank you very much great job as usual. We're moving right along here to item number five

1:15 – 1:205 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:11 · ≈ 10:15 AM

Madam Chair, members of the Board. Item 5 is from Public Works. It's brought to the Board as the Board of Directors of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year 2012-13 Annual Maintenance Plan.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:15:23 · ≈ 10:15 AM

And Madam Chair and Board Members, as I mentioned earlier our last two items are the annual maintenance plans for flood control and transportation and as your board knows for both of these plans we've developed a very inclusive community processes for each over the years and this year what we're proposing is in the future That we come to your board on the admin agenda.

Our desire would be to get your approval that way, I think that might be a more efficient use of your boards time since we really haven't had public speakers for quite some times on these items and we tend to deal with the issues through our public workshops on these annual maintenance plans so it'll be completely up to you Madam Chair and your Board if you desire us to do that in the future Our presentation today is going to be by Maureen Spencer. She's our Flood Control Maintenance Manager, and this is I believe her first time presenting at the Board. She has a long history with this

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:16:16 · ≈ 10:16 AM

plan. Thank you Mr. McAulpin. Ms. Spencer before you go, I think CEO Waller wants to make a comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:16:22 · ≈ 10:16 AM

Chair, Supervisors one of the reasons that I think you aren't seeing a lot of public speakers on these two items is because Mr. McAulpin and his team do an excellent job of getting public input throughout the year. And so I think that's certainly a testament to why this has become more administrative in nature, and I know that they'll continue to do that very same kind of outreach and attention every day of the year to our citizens and our residents.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:16:51 · ≈ 10:16 AM

I totally agree. Good morning, Ms. Spencer. Good morning Madam Chair and members of the Board. I'm pleased to present to you the 2012-2013 Flood Control Annual Maintenance Plan. This is the 21st annual plan in our maintenance program so I am pleased Share that with you just as a point of interest on our first slide. We have some pictures of after the Haysa Cedar fire, which was in 2009 showing the restoration and the comeback of the vegetation in the hills above Santa Barbara. The watersheds are doing quite nicely.

As Mr. McGolpin mentioned, we have a very distinct process that we go through for our annual routine maintenance plan beginning in March and April. We survey and walk creeks throughout the county. We look at 59 different drainages either walking or driving with rubber boots on the whole time. In May, after we've prioritized the maintenance needs, we go ahead and write our project descriptions. And the project summary this year was available on May 10th that is provided to resource agencies and interested parties.

We post that also on our website Each year we do public workshops. We have one in North County and one in South Coast, and as usual we did not receive any public comment. We did not have any attendees. That's pretty typical. Many years ago we would receive a couple but for the last 10 years we have not. We have the annual plan was complete on June 6th and we posted that on our website. And the final annual plan was distributed on June 7th again, we mail letters out to interested parties regulatory agencies and also submit disks with it electronically.

And here we are today on June 19th before the board. Once we receive approval today, we will go and get all of our permits secured. We do our maintenance between August 1st with our work completed about mid-December. Just want to share with you a few photos of representative maintenance in our annual plan. On the top left, you have Zaca Creek in Buelton that shows a debris plug and crews will use hand tools to break that up and remove that from from the drainage. The top right is San Antonio Creek showing a downed tree.

Typical maintenance in our annual plan most of our most of our maintenance in our annual plan includes vegetation removal or Management with a lot of downed trees. And then on our bottom left, Mission Creek and Santa Barbara showing some non-native vegetation growing that we will be removing as well as some obstructive vegetation in the creek bottom. This shows the list of all of the creeks included in this year's annual plan. We have 34 drainages included in the annual plan, it is a very typical annual plan like I mentioned ranging from mostly vegetation management little bit of sediment control bank protection as well as restoration And another point of interest, we have several listed species in the county that we have to manage around and protect during our maintenance activities.

On your top left is the tidewater goby. The middle is a southern steelhead and on the bottom right is the red-legged frog. I would be glad to answer any questions. Thank you Ms. Spencer. Supervisor Wolk?

1:20 – 1:2416 turns

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:20:20 · ≈ 10:20 AM

Thank you. Great job. You know, I happened to look at the list online and I thought that the information that was there was really interesting. It talked about how long the project would last, what exactly you were going to be doing. So if you did want to move this off departmental onto administrative, I think that if you could Include that information. It's it's really helpful It describes a little bit more detail what you're going to be doing and I think it would be helpful to the public as well Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:20:51 · ≈ 10:20 AM

I'm sure we'd be happy to do that I also wanted to comment that Miss Spencer is the only human alive who has been involved in all 21 of those annual plans not even I have that distinction

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:21:02 · ≈ 10:21 AM

And she looks really good in those rubber boots You know, I actually had a question about your Your timeline, it says here you know you start in August and you complete in December. And given the rainy season here can start by the end of October certainly you know by November or December I realize you have to get permits and all that but does that ever pose a problem? Is there a way that you can kind of back up the process a month or so to make sure that you're not impacted by an early rainy season?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:21:34 · ≈ 10:21 AM

Madam Chair, the reason we start August 1st is because of permit regulations mainly from the Department of Fish and Game that has to do with nesting birds. And so we can't start until August 1st and most of our rain in that early part of the season we can work around. We also have permit conditions that require us to pull out if we have flow. We cannot work in flowing water. So we have a lot of basically mitigation measures that allow us to work in a little bit of water

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:22:02 · ≈ 10:22 AM

I see. So your timeline is definitely defined by the other agencies? It's definitely defined by all the permit conditions, yes. Thank you. All right. Any other questions or comments? Members of the public that want to speak? Ms. Jarwin?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:22:15 · ≈ 10:22 AM

I do have a question and I'm just looking at the clock and thinking yay! I actually have time to ask this question that I would've never asked under any circumstances. San Ynez River And I've heard the answer before, but I'd just like to hear it again. Many, many constituents in Lompoc say why can't we have the McLaughlin Crossing? If I hear that once, I hear it 30 times a year and so I really appreciate if you guys would just put it on the record and tell us why and how and what story is.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:22:50 · ≈ 10:22 AM

Madam Chair and Supervisors, a great memory serves. We can knock some rust off on this one. Certainly I think from a flood control perspective we could eventually get through a permit process and get the okay if you will to construct it but when we looked at it in the past it just wasn't financially feasible if you will because it gets blown out every year and the costs outweighed the benefit.

It was only open for a few months a year and then it would get blown out and we'd have to go through the permit process again

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:17 · ≈ 10:23 AM

And so it was basically a dry water cross, an Arizona crossing.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:23:22 · ≈ 10:23 AM

It was exactly like what we had out at Tepeskay where we put the Tepescay Bridge in. It was essentially a dirt summer crossing with culverts in it and we would put a material on top to kind of keep the dust down hold it together for a few months and then the river would start to flow and we would lose the crossing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:40 · ≈ 10:23 AM

So it is doable if the money was there?

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:23:44 · ≈ 10:23 AM

It's very expensive

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:45 · ≈ 10:23 AM

And but it's

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:23:46 · ≈ 10:23 AM

not outweighed the benefit. OK,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:49 · ≈ 10:23 AM

thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:23:51 · ≈ 10:23 AM

All right. Any other questions? Otherwise I guess we're ready for a motion. Thank you, Supervisor Gray. Second second by Supervisor Wolf. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Wonderful job. Thank you. Mr. McLaughlin, you're going through in record time here

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:24:16 · ≈ 10:24 AM

That was the goal.

1:24 – 1:4112 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:24:18 · ≈ 10:24 AM

Madam Chair, this is item 6 from Public Works. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the fiscal year 2012-13 Road Maintenance Annual Plan.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:24:27 · ≈ 10:24 AM

Madam Chair and board members final item of the day and our final annual plan for your consideration this morning we're going to talk a bit about the road maintenance annual plan or roadmap for fiscal year 12-13 in our presentation today will be a tag team between myself and Eric Pearson our interim deputy of transportation So in transportation, our mission in that particular division is to provide a clear path, smooth ride and a safe trip for the traveling public. And as your board knows, our road maintenance annual plan looks at both our corrective maintenance, that's the work our crews do around the county from three main roadyards down in Goleta, on Lompoc and up here in Santa Maria every day on our system, as well as our preventative maintenance program also known as our pavement preservation program And that's the work that we typically put out to the contracting community.

All this work is designed to essentially maintain our over 1,670 lane mile asphalt pavement system. That system also includes 110 major bridge structures, 43 traffic signals throughout the county, 14,000 street trees, certainly curb gutter and sidewalk in our urbanized areas and well over 4,200 drainage facilities throughout the county. And if your board recalls our Measure A presentation we talked this year about our five-year backlog it's a bit over 250 million dollars at this point and we talked a bit I believe last week as well as Measure A that You know, we're really in need of some supplemental funding at this point to really start addressing our backlog. Another piece of information has been published and it was the American Society of Civil Engineers report card if you will ASCE for California.

And they took a look at the state's transportation system up and down. And overall, they gave the State of California for Transportation a C-minus. Eric reached out and spoke specifically with the author about that to see how a PCI, Pavement Condition Index 61 correlates. And we're about in the same spot so if you want to look at it from a report card grade perspective Santa Barbara County now is about a C- as well when you look at the same standards as ASCE is using.

So, at this point I'm going to turn the presentation over to Eric to kind of go through the planning process and the document itself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:26:59 · ≈ 10:26 AM

Thank You Scott. Madam Chair, Supervisors good morning.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:27:03 · ≈ 10:27 AM

Good morning Mr. Pearson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:27:05 · ≈ 10:27 AM

This roadmap process started in 1994. The annual process has been essentially the same each year, so this slide shows the process that we go through. The first step is to identify the needs of the transportation infrastructure. The payment and bridge conditions are reviewed in the field and programmed into a software program, it's a software management system that we call Street Saver.

And also the bridge information is programmed into our bridge maintenance system. In the second step, staff prepares a priority of recommended maintenance projects utilizing the program data output technical field reviews so we actually go out in the field and look at the pavement and bridges. And then we also have a project initiation database, that's where anybody can call us throughout the year and we fill out a form for a project that they're requesting. Could be just a little piece of concrete driveway or it could be a whole road paved so we keep a list of those.

As a major part of the roadmap, we hold two public hearings. One in North County and one in South County. The public hearings assist us in receiving input from the citizens on community needs. This year we held those hearings in March. As part of the process, we meet with your staff three times during the roadmap process on district-specific priorities and to review the public hearing comments.

So we've got all that and the final draft is completed and recommended to you, the 2012-2013 Roadmap. The red map contains work plans for two maintenance components, corrective maintenance and preventative maintenance. This slide shows the main categories of corrective maintenance. This is the work our road crews do on a daily basis out of the Santa Barbara, Lompoc and Santa Maria roadyards.

This year the corrective maintenance is funded by Measure A sales tax, state gas tax. Our general fund which is our maintenance of effort and some state transportation funding The other part of our work plan is the preventive maintenance. This is like our surface treatments where we do major roadway works, scrub seals, overlays and we also have some other...

We have struts absorbing membrane inner layers. We call them SAMIs that's like a rubberized asphalt or rubberized tire ground up into like an oil compound So these we typically put out to contractors, and we're going to do 63 lane rails of County Road this year. This year the preventive maintenance work is funded with Measure A and General Fund. That's the general fund designations that half a million dollars that we've got for the general fund designations.

Since 1999, the department's philosophy has been one of patient preservation over a worst first strategy. The worst first strategy treating the worst first roads has not proven to be cost effective. You repair a few roads that are very badly deteriorated at a great expense per lane mile and ignore those roads that are in good to fair condition. The end result is more good to fair streets become worse.

So we use the pavement preservation strategy which puts some of the treatments on good to fair streets first, keep them in good shape so they do not drop to the worst category. Some of the benefits of pavement preservation are shown here. Cost effectiveness, improved overall pavement condition, higher customer satisfaction and increased safety. This next slide shows all the funding sources for this year's roadmap.

This year we took the Capital Improvement Program out of the roadmap, so this is a maintenance document only starting this year. We actually have a separate capital improvement program document that you, the board approves. So this year it's a maintenance only for 14.7 approximately $14.8 million and the funding sources are shown here And our last slide, I won't read all the recommendations for the sake of time.

This shows these are exactly as they appear in your board letter and I wanted to thank you all and for your participation in this year's roadmap.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:32:02 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Thank You Mr. Pearson any questions for Mr. McGaughlin or Mr. Pearson on the road map? Supervisor Lavagnino

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction1:32:10 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Thank you, Madam Chair. I saw Scott this morning and I said thank you very much for just left the budget and come out of that shock. And maybe I wasn't as knowledgeable last year in looking at this but This is very sobering. I mean, I think we kind of get lulled a little bit because of the great job our Public Works Department does and the way that they're able to patch things together but it's very scary to me that we are basically sitting on a C minus grade right now We don't really have a plan per se of how to get out of that and we see a severe slope that will rapidly deteriorate our roads quicker if we don't fill that gap.

And I saw also in the report it said we could drop to a PCI of 50 by 2020, and our backlog would double to about 500 million. So When I came out of the budget, I felt pretty good about things. And I know I'm really excited about the plan we have for the North County Jail. That's the other large item that I see that is unfunded but at least we have a plan and we're working toward that.

But on roads, you know, we've got a $12 million shortfall just in pavement every year and if we don't start addressing it, that number is going to jump considerably so I don't know, I guess I'm scrambling because I see us on the verge of a crisis here and I'm trying to figure out what the new dramatic influx of revenue is going to be to plug that hole or to start addressing that.

And I guess I look to the CEO or to Scott Talking off the ledge a little bit here and making me feel better, but I guess without revenue. The old answer is without money we can't get the job done. And if we don't see a new significant source of revenue, we are going to be precipitously close to a failing grade on our roads. Am I correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:34:26 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Yeah. CEO Willa. Chairwoman Supervisor. Yes, we do have a huge backlog on our road repairs I guess the good news, if there can be any good news to this is this is something that's systemic through the entire nation. C- as poor as it sounds when compared with many others is actually reasonably good. One of the things that your board and our region has done that I think is very positive is the Measure A, because many of the regions in California have not put a tax upon their region to help leverage other funding. And so I think that's something that's very positive.

On the negative side, certainly would very much look for future opportunities to enhance our road maintenance because the movement of people and goods is absolutely critical to the vitality of our economy. So I can tell you that we will work with Public Works, our legislature and continue to try to find revenue sources that can help dig us out of this hole.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction1:35:41 · ≈ 10:35 AM

Madam Chair, I mean, I really appreciate that I can't though, you know and I know you don't settle for anything but the best. And C-minus for me is not good enough. Our constituents aren't going to feel that's good enough. The problem with Measure A and I really appreciate the fact that the taxpayers passed that. But we are spending quite a bit of that money on the freeway which is our number one priority to get the 101 put to bed The problem with that is if you're not on the 101, the rest of our county roads are deteriorating. And so one of the things I was thinking right off the bat, I'm sure people are going to say well okay our roads, our county roads are in trouble let's go back to the taxpayer but That's not going to happen. We already have Measure A out there.

I don't really see them lining up to do another tax. They already feel like Measure A is supposed to pay for all those things, so you know we've got ourselves in a little bit of a box here, so I'm very interested to see what other ideas we have as far as revenue enhancement.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:36:49 · ≈ 10:36 AM

Thank you Supervisor LaVagnino. Supervisor Gray?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:36:52 · ≈ 10:36 AM

Madam Chair if this conversation has been going on for many, many years as did the jail conversation. And the plan, the road system plan map that they, that the department comes up with every year is almost like putting frosting on a non-existing cake. I mean it's great and it works but I think if the board has the appetite To go in this direction, we should find a way to package this problem as we package the jail problem. I'm going to remind you that it took years and years to get the jail problem to the point where the public really believes we have a jail problem. We're putting $1 million a year aside and maybe more to take care of that but the board has to have the appetite to say Let's market and package and work with our constituents because I agree with Supervisor Lavinino.

There is not the taxing appetite there, because people think they did it in Measure A. And I watched us when we managed to get Measure A supported It had to be like a huge panic again, go for it twice, identify what was going to be done. So we have, we've seen the jail example, we've seen the Measure A example and the roadmap is wonderful and very well thought out but that is only frosting on a non-existing cake.

But we have to have the appetite of the entire board to say This has to be elevated. I personally am willing to do that this has to be elevated to the level at which the problem was for the jail so that we start saving and working and finding a way to put these roads to where you would give them. I'm not trying to listen to the engineers it sounds like C's okay with you guys? I don't know. You know, if my kid didn't get an A she was in trouble but I don't know if that's doable and what is good enough and how do we... So that's where I'd like to see us go. I don' t know if we have that appetite but I certainly would like to see us going that direction.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:39:16 · ≈ 10:39 AM

Thank you Supervisor Gray. Supervisor Wolf, did you have any comments? No? Well I just wanted to say that however we want to grade our pavement in the county at this point in time, I would certainly grade your department an A plus in responsiveness And I really also want to thank Mr. Pearson, who has stepped into this role and I think is just doing a tremendous job.

And I think that we would all agree that for our constituents public works issues are probably what we may hear about most. It is those day-to-day neighborhood street tree pothole paving issues You know, that we hear about and that your department is so responsive to us on and to the public. So I really want to thank you for that. Our roads and our bridges in some ways are what people notice the most both the residents and the visitors. And in that way they're kind of a face of the county one of the things that people look at in Santa Barbara County So even though they may not be to the level that we wish they were, they are I think very good in many ways. And I know that you and your staff maximize the resources that we have to the best extent possible.

I also want to say that in talking about funding sources and all of that You know, it's interesting since we just had the presentation about flood benefit assessment districts that people don't seem to be concerned about because they see the immediate benefit of the protection of their property. The value of their property in the same way that having pavement, having roads and bridges and everything good repair is not only good for the infrastructure but also good for property values. And so You know, while you know we don't want to burden the taxpayers and the property owners anymore. I think that sometimes when assessments are brought very close to home so that people don't think that oh i'm just paying more sales tax and I don't really know how that's going to benefit me or my neighborhood or my city or my community Directly in the same way that I think that the flood control benefit assessment being divided up by area people know that they pay into that and that's going to directly help to protect their property.

So is that a similar vehicle that we might consider for areas of the county to talk about roads and bridges?

1:41 – 1:4914 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:41:50 · ≈ 10:41 AM

CEO Waller? Chairwoman, it certainly is that I know a portion of that is already done through CSD, CSAs things of that nature also through your transportation impact fees upon developers. The difficult part of that is that flood maintenance for the most part can be allocated to specific areas many times transportation networks are much more difficult now obviously local streets have benefit to the local but when you start looking at streets And roads that go across various jurisdictions, allocation of those costs to individuals become much more difficult. But certainly something that we would continue to support as residents and neighborhoods come forward and ask for improvements and express a willingness to contribute to those. Okay

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:42:42 · ≈ 10:42 AM

thank you. All right Supervisor Wolf.

CommentDon WardProposed · by introduction1:42:46 · ≈ 10:42 AM

I just wanted to echo Supervisor Forrest's compliments to your department. I think in developing this roadmap, I don't know how many other agencies do what you do but it is an opportunity for our constituents to have a voice and certainly my district constituents as you know are not shy about coming to those meetings but the best thing is that they see results Actually, I give credit to my constituents because they understand that sometimes they're going to have to wait a year or two, sometimes three to get the result that they've been waiting for and that they absolutely need.

I think patience is a virtue in my district. The other thing that you do that I think is quite outstanding, is going out and meeting with the neighborhood groups and talking about the tree program, the tree replacement program. Working with constituents in my district has been amazing. They have been so grateful for you coming out to the streets having these meetings and letting them be a partner In making some of these roadway improvements that are so desperately needed. So, and we also have a CSA in our district that does help to some degree.

Yes, we need more funding and I you know this this board will have to grapple with it. We did have the issue come before us for a oil severance tax that didn't get the support of the board that wouldn't have so You know well We'll keep working and in trying to get some Unanimity here or some consensus on how we can fund some of these things but for now I want to just you know thank you for the work that you're doing and The needs are incredibly, they're not going away. And I've talked to you before about certain streets in my district that are in terrible disrepair and these are not streets that no one travels there's streets within a community that absolutely is, I almost want to say shameful but I think folks understand that there is a waiting list And that we will get to it.

We will get to it and I think that's the one, the one good thing. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:45:21 · ≈ 10:45 AM

And I think that is really true. You know, I think for all of us to have Public Works staff go out and meet with concerned residents or community groups, homeowner groups means so much because people do just want to be heard they want to, you know Have their streets put on the list. They realize that you can't come out the next day and fix them, but if they're heard and they know that eventually it's going to be taken care of, that really makes all the difference. I think Supervisor Levin, you know, and then Supervisor Gray.

GuestJoni GrayProposed · by introduction1:45:51 · ≈ 10:45 AM

Thank you Madam Chair. And I just wanted to say Scott that I hope that it wasn't taken that I was in any way Saying anything negative about your department, I think you guys do an outstanding job. I'm trying to get you...I think we're all trying to... I think the message is that we're trying to get is that you need more resources. We understand that and we're going to do the best we can to make that happen so.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:46:14 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:46:14 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Gray? My comment was twofold. I was thinking we were just talking about all the bad stuff when yet there's really some good stuffs going on. And I wanted another report kind of update on Street trees because that used to be a huge problem and I don't even see it in my neighborhoods anymore.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:46:32 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Madam Chair and Supervisor Gray, as you know we created the partnership program some years ago. And we asked the adjacent property owners to help us because street trees were put in when tracks were developed and we have a four-and-a-half foot parkway. Unfortunately when those tracks were built a lot of thought wasn't given to the type of tree that got put in that four-and-a half foot space so some of these trees are now six feet wide and the sidewalks been buckled and curb and gutters up in the air Certainly with the funding situation we had, we couldn't do it ourselves. And we can't really build anything nowadays without partnerships, be it financial or support what have you. So we have a 50-50 partnership where we ask the adjacent property owner to partner with us to replace the tree, take the existing tree down, put a new tree in coming off one of our approved lists either South County or North County and help pay for the new sidewalk and the new curb and gutter And Mr.

Udi Loza runs that program for us and he's been on that program from day one, and we've had waiting lists of 8 months to 12 months at times so certainly in this economy it's had a bit of an impact and the waiting list is a little shorter. We also have an internal concrete crew now that goes out and does work like that as well and it's been tremendous. We'd go into a street and we get one resident to sign up and the work would get done And then other residents would say, well that's pretty cool. I want to do that too because they're on the list at some point we can hopefully eventually get to that street and the first phase is to repair the curb gutter and sidewalk but a lot of folks come into this partnership and they want to improve the neighborhood on their own and work with us so it's been great.

But street trees are still out there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:48:16 · ≈ 10:48 AM

It's really changed since I first became supervisor and I think that's the interesting part about this department's report Is once it gets done, it's off the chart. Nobody even thinks about it. I was thinking about how many times we answered the phone with people saying that Clark Road is the worst place I've ever driven and I hate it. It's horrible. Do something do something do something. We did something. It' great. It all perfect. Did we get one call that says Thank you Scott for fixing that road. Not a call, not a peep, not a toot.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:48:50 · ≈ 10:48 AM

That's why it's our job.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:48:51 · ≈ 10:48 AM

That's right but I do want us to kind of keep that in front of us as we all are and when it gets done it's just totally off the chart but that's the way it works. I know I should go ahead Scott.

CommentAndy CaldwellProposed · by introduction1:49:07 · ≈ 10:49 AM

Well I was just going to say quickly Madam Chair, Supervisor Gray. It's funny because we always say if they're thinking about us then there's a problem

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:49:13 · ≈ 10:49 AM

Actually, you ought to have someone that does the little needlepoint thing do one of those for your office. If you're thinking about us it's a problem. I think that I could move this issue at this point in

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:49:25 · ≈ 10:49 AM

time. Thank you, Supervisor Gray. Second? Second from Supervisor Wolff. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Thank you very much. We've completed our departmental agenda item. We are going to go into closed session. Mr. Marshall do you want to go ahead and read what's on our agenda there we will be coming out from closed session but not to take up any more departmental agenda items

1:49 – 1:515 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:49:49 · ≈ 10:49 AM

In that case, Madam Chair, I'd like to just say one thing before we adjourn. I'd like to ask the board that when we do adjourn, that we adjourned in honor of Betty Fletcher. Betty just passed and she is the wife of Harold Fletcher. And so I would ask us to adjourn in her honor.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:50:07 · ≈ 10:50 AM

All right. Thank you. Thank you, Supervisor Gray. Mr. Marshall?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:50:10 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Yes, thank you Madam Chair. Today your board has one item on the closed session conference with labor negotiator employer relations all bargaining units management and represented employees.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:50:19 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:50:49 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Thank you. you