UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:02 – 0:0624 turns
Well, let's see. I'm a vegetarian. I don't impose
that on my friends. We haven't worked
Good morning and welcome to our May 9th Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting. Mr. Allen would you call the roll please?
Mr. Adam, Mr. Lavinino, Mr. Williams, Ms. Wolfe.
I'm going to
try it again. Supervisor Wolfe Okay great. And Ms. Hartman?
May I have a motion to approve the minutes of May 2, 2017? So moved. A second? Second. Would you call the roll Mr. Allen?
Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Mr Williams? Aye Ms. Wolk? Aye And Ms. Hartman? Aye Passes 5-0
And
do
we have a CEO's report,
Ms.
Miyasato?
I do Chair Hartman and board members good morning actually two just quick announcements and they're actually recognitions and they both relate to the Public Works Department so one is recognizing and congratulating Scott McAulpin our public works director who was recently installed as the vice president of the National Association of County Engineers as the regional The western regional vice president during its annual conference. This is a big honor for Scott and for us to be recognized in that way. Scott's also done his share to help bring the need for more local infrastructure at the national level so thank you Scott and congratulations.
Also, we've mentioned this other project before but the recognition keeps coming in and that is that the Public Works San Pedro Las Vegas Creek Improvement Project. It won an award recently from the California Counties Architects and Engineers Association as the medium county award and a special jury's award for the project. Mr. Fairham has the beautiful award that he can flash for us.
Like the Washington Monument
The jury felt compelled to issue the special award based on the complexity and overall benefit to the community. So congratulations again Public Works. That concludes my report.
Thank you. Turning to our administrative agenda we have five honorary resolutions today a 14 day 18 May I have a motion to approve those
so moved.
And again we need a roll call vote because we're in two different places
Mr. Adam, Mr. Lavinino, Mr. Williams, Ms. Wolfe?
Aye.
And Ms. Hartman?
Aye.
Passes 5-0.
0:06 – 0:116 turns
And would you read A14 into the record please Mr. Allen
Item A14, this is a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It's a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2017 as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County and I think Sharon Byrne is here? Is Sharon here or did we have anybody from the mental health Commission? Okay okay great then anybody come on up And I'll go ahead, I'll read the resolution into the record.
Whereas the U.S. Surgeon General has found that one in every five Americans experiences a mental disorder in any given year and half of all Americans at some time in their lives and that mental illnesses are far more common than cancer, diabetes, heart disease or arthritis. These are real treatable diseases that can affect anyone regardless of age. And whereas the Santa Barbara County Mental Health Commission supports proactive community collaborations to maximize the mental health of all people and with effective treatment, individuals with mental health conditions can recover and lead full productive lives.
And whereas the Santa Barbara County Behavioral Health Steering Committee has adopted vision and guiding principles which represent the core characteristics and service principles for the system that are all included in all system planning activities and service. And whereas, Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness is deploying change agents at all levels of clinical operations and administration to advance system change. Whereas, Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness is developing commitments from all system partners reflecting the system framework for a culturally competent accessible integrated continuous and comprehensive system of care in which any door is the right door for those with a combination of substance abuse or mental health issues.
Now, therefore it be hereby ordered and resolved that the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim the month of May 2017 as Mental Health Month. Calls upon all Santa Barbara County citizens to fight stigma associated with mental illness and reaffirm a commitment to supporting the mental health of all people in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today
So Sharon is not here yet, but we do have two commission members. We'll ask them to come up, but I will tell you that they have been doing some hard work. They've been willing to meet and do all Saturday retreats so that they can get more work done and get to know each other and get to know the material better. So it's a great group of commissioners to work with.
Board, I'm very thankful for this. I'm sorry I'm a little hoarse. I just got a frog somewhere but I want to thank you all for this award. It means so much to all what we do with the director and now the acquisition together of the Alcohol and Drug Board with Mental Health Commission. I think you're going to see some better improvements coming from all areas It's been time that we should have done this a while back, but.
We appreciate all your help. We appreciate all the help from every agency in this county. Because without it. We wouldn't be anywhere where we are. And I appreciated the director we have behind us. She's doing an excellent job. We have a former member that worked in Who gives us another approach to this problem? And I sat on the Mental Health Commission before it merged for over 10 years.
And I think with all this together, I think you're going to see a lot better program coming out of our group together. So thank you very much. I appreciate everything.
Thank you. I just want to thank the board for its past and continued support of the department means so much, I guess I say the department. I'm no longer employed. Um, been retired for two years now going on three and uh, would like your consideration for the Laura's law pilot project also. Thank y'all
I just wanted to say thank you to Supervisor Williams for attending the meetings and being part of this group. It's really amazing to have that direct connection with the board and have him be able to share with you kind of what's going on so we really appreciate that active participation, so thank you
0:11 – 0:168 turns
Item A-15 Mr. Allen.
Chair Hartman and members of the board, Item A- 15 is a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Wolf and I believe that Supervisor Hartman is going to fill in here in Santa Maria with the presentation this is recognizing the month of May 2017 as National Foster Care Month in Santa Barbara County and we have Arminia Solario. Is Arminia here? Great! And then we've got representatives from the department and some others so I'll go ahead and read this resolution into the record Whereas every child deserves to belong to a family and resource families are critical member of the Child Welfare Team that allow children and youth separated from their homes through no fault of their own, to live in nurturing and safe family environments that provide a sense of belonging and lifelong connections.
And whereas on any given day in Santa Barbara County there are over 400 children and youth in foster care who need love support and guidance so they can thrive and develop to their best potential. Older youth in foster care need guidance, stability and love that's essential for a young person to thrive and become a successful adult. And whereas the ongoing efforts of resource families, mentors, advocates, social workers and volunteers steadfastly help many children and youth face life challenges without feeling alone or isolated And whereas, thanks to our community's heroes, numerous children and youth who have experienced abuse or neglect will safely reunify with their parents, form lifelong permanent connections with relatives, resource families and adoptive families or be supported into independent adulthood.
Now therefore I hereby order and resolve that the Board of Supervisors Hereby I recognize May 2017 as National Foster Care Month in recognition of the value of resource families providing the children and youth of our county hope, safety and the opportunity to heal. Pass it adopted today.
Madam Chair.
Thank you so much Chair Hartman. Madam
Chair. And I think Supervisor Wolf who sponsored this award would like to say something first
Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm sorry that I'm not there with all of you today. I just wanted to reiterate one of the statements that was made in the resolution that these really are our heroes in our community who are working with these children and so I just want to congratulate The family that's before you today and all the resource families that are taking care of our 400 plus children on a daily basis. And to our social workers who are helping to move that forward and provide the support that they need. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you so much Chair Hartman, Supervisor Wolf and Board. I'm Amy Krueger with the Department of Social Services Adult and Children's Services. With me are Ms. Herminia Solorio who we're honoring today our Foster Parent Recruitment Retention Liaison Gustavo Prado and of course our Director Nielsen. We're recognizing Miss Solorio this morning because of the dedication she's shown in her life to supporting children. She's provided over 20 years as a daycare provider, a resource parent and an adoptive mother. She's cared for over 20 children many with special needs and she also provides a home for teens which is a huge need in our community. And because of her willingness to do so we've been able to keep many children in our community who otherwise might have been placed out of county or in group homes So we really want to recognize Miss Solorio for that dedication, and she's also volunteered to mentor other families to help show them the way in caring for the older youth in our community in order to support that effort.
Thank you.
This is an honor for me that I never thought about. I'm very happy to help the community, especially the kids. As a single mom, I raised my three kids since they were little and I have an adopted son that is here with me, Alejandro sitting there. It's you know I'd be so happy to do this for the children and we need a lot of help more foster houses and more help for them too. You know because sometimes In a short time, you know the large years that I had my kids like for two years and they went back to the moms. And sometimes the parents are not ready, you know, to take it back. I see some of the kids that, you know, they need more help, you And doctors and all psychological and you know.
A lot of help they need. You know because they came from a lot of houses that they're not you know well constitution you know and there are very unstable homes so we need a lot of help for those kids. That's what I see on those years that I've been as a foster mom and thank you for everything. Thank you very much.
0:16 – 0:193 turns
Item A-16 Mr. Allen.
Chair Hartman, members of the board item a 16 is a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Hartman and this is a resolution to commemorate the naming of the Cedillo Community Center in Guadalupe and Eva Cedillo. Is Eva here? Come on up to the mic and I'll read the resolution into the record Whereas the Board of Trustees of the Guadalupe Union School District have renamed the Family Service Center to the Cedillo Community Center, this happened on February 2nd 2017. And whereas Eva Cedillo has volunteered for over 30 years of community service at the elementary junior high school and other community projects totaling over 10,000 hours And whereas her volunteering at Mary Buren School, the Migrant Program, the McKenzie Junior High School School Site Council and Rigetti High School Migrant Program Region 18 as Vice President and President all provided tremendous support to the education of all who participated in the school projects.
And whereas her voice and leadership in support of providing affordable housing, senior services and advocate for providing bus transportation for Rigetti High School students was extremely important in establishing needed services to Guadalupe residents. And whereas her continued commitment to helping make Guadalupe a better place to live for all residents and is appreciated by all those who have benefited from her unselfish willingness to give back to our community And whereas her love of the community of Guadalupe is reflected by her continued commitment and dedication to positive growth and community betterment. Now therefore, let it be hereby ordered and resolved that the Senate Barbara County Board of Supervisors proclaim that the formerly named Guadalupe Service Center located at 4681 11th Street in Guadaluable as now recognized as the Cedillo Community Center passed and adopted today.
Thank you. Thank you so much. This is a very very important for me if I'm part of your community. It's a big big motivation for my community working together OK. Thank you thank you.
0:19 – 0:244 turns
And turning to age 17 Mr. Allen.
Okay. Item A-17, this is a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Adam and this is a resolution recognizing Vicki Anderson as the Santa Barbara County Arts Commission 2017 Leadership in the Arts Award recipient. And if Vicki could come on up to the microphone and we have representatives of the arts commission here and I'll go ahead read the resolution into the record Whereas Vicki Anderson has been recognized by the Santa Barbara County Arts Commission as the 2017 Leadership in the Arts Award recipient for her significant impact on the arts and culture of Santa Barbara County. And whereas, Vicki has provided decades of invaluable guidance and insight to the Lompoc community serving as an officer and member of the Lompoc Valley Arts Council which provides a monthly forum for representatives from local arts and culture organizations to collaborate on programming and share resources that benefit local residents students and cultural practitioners And whereas, Vicky has served as the founding member of the Lompoc Mural Society which represents Santa Barbara County in the Global Mural Arts and Cultural Tourism Association as well as the California Public Art and Mural Society.
She's personally overseen the storage maintenance preservation and promotion of murals including the establishment of a Lompoc arts and cultural weekend which opened the world-renowned mural making program to the public Whereas Vicki is known for vivid impressionistic paintings and tremendous canon of visual art. Ms. Anderson's vast portfolio includes the 12 by 48 foot Mission Vieja mural that depicts and commemorates Lompoc's lost mission.
Vicki has been a tireless advocate for enhancing access to the arts for all residents of Santa Barbara County including residents with disabilities, youth and minorities. As an educator Ms. Anderson has spearheaded efforts to establish summer music theater and exhibition opportunities for young artists that live in study in Santa Barbara ensuring the preservation and future of Santa Barbara's unique cultural signature And whereas, Vicki Anderson contributes to art and culture throughout Santa Barbara County including the St. Is Valley Quick Draw Arts Festival which is now in its 30th year.
Now therefore it is hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors honors Vicki Anderson upon receiving the County Arts Commission Leadership in the Arts Award and commends her for sharing her knowledge talent and passion for the fine arts with all of our communities passed and adopted today
I'm Brenda French, 4th District Commissioner and Arts Commissioner. And I nominated Vicki for all the reasons you heard in the resolution. Mainly my appreciation for her goes back many many years. And she's the go to person if there is an arts organization or a group in the community that needs help they go to Vicki. She's always there if it's to speak before a planning commission explaining the difference between graffiti art and tagging She's there to do it, to help a young artist make his way just for everything and for the murals. I mean she's there organizing everything but mainly it's because she's the go-to person and dependable We couldn't get along without her I don't think.
And any of you that have been to Lompoc and see all the murals, although she's not responsible for organizing all of them, she has done...she has been behind many of them Particularly the mural in a day features and right from the very beginning she saw it as a way to add to the community. And we have many businesses that add to the picture without going through the Mural Society or whatever. And so it's a very colorful place to be and we welcome you to Lompoc anytime you want to come.
And let me introduce Vicki Anderson
I'd like to thank the supervisors and the County Arts Commission for this great award. It's kind of hard getting an award for something that is so close to my heart because I truly enjoy the arts and have been involved in them since High school maybe. Lompoc is a great community, but so are all the other surrounding ones and all the arts in all the communities and all the states in all the world which we seem to be fighting a little bit now as to how much support we're going to get But once again, I'd like to thank you and this is kind of like right when I was thinking about slowing down.
But like I said it's close to my heart. I'd also like to give a special thanks to my husband who's here today. He's kind of always let me do what I want so that's one of the reasons I've been able to do what I do in lawn poke in the arts. Thank you very much
0:24 – 0:294 turns
And our final resolution for today A18 Mr. Allen.
Chair Hartman, members of the board item A18 is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino this is a resolution proclaiming May 19 2017 as honor a hero hire a veteran day in Santa Barbara County and I think Frank Capo's here? And I'll go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas, the people of our community have great appreciation and admiration for the many local men and women who've served their country in the armed forces to protect and preserve the freedoms enjoyed by our community and by all Americans.
And whereas, in war, international conflicts, and peacekeeping missions, men and women have been wounded, taken as prisoners, and died in the line of duty. And whereas veterans possess a wide variety of valuable job qualifications and skills including experience, maturity, leadership and loyalty that make them ideal candidates for employment. And whereas local veterans employment representatives disabled veteran outreach program representatives and other Employment Development Department staff are committed to ensuring that veterans receive the services and programs to which they're entitled and promoting employer interest in hiring veterans.
Now therefore it be hereby ordered and resolved that the Board of Supervisors, the County of Santa Barbara does hereby proclaim May 19 2017 as Honor a Hero Hire a Veteran Day in Santa Barbara County and urge all local employers organized labor veteran organizations and other government leaders to support this worthy campaign to increase employment opportunities for the men and women who have faithfully served our nation in the military. Passing it off today
Thank you Madam Chair and Board of Supervisors. I'm getting old, my eyes are failing me and I'm not quite as old as Supervisor Lavinino so... I am honored to be here today to accept this resolution on behalf the Veterans team at the Employment Development Department. The Honor a Hero Hire Veteran Job Fair was initiative started by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2009.
Subsequently Governor Brown has decided to continue with this project By ensuring that men and women that serve in our military have the necessary tools and assistance to help them transition to civilian life after leaving the military. This year's event will be on May 19th from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m at the Veterans Memorial Building here in Santa Maria. The Honor Hero Hire Veteran Job Fair is the second such event in as many years Last year we had 65 employers, training providers and community-based organizations at the event. Currently we have at least 50 employers, CBOs and training providers signed up. If you know of an employer that's looking to actively hire, have them contact myself or the nearest local employment development department.
Although the event is targeted for veterans it's open to the public. I also want to applaud the Board of Supervisors for their continued support for veterans' activities here in the county. It's through the Hire a Hero, Honor a Veteran, Veterans Stand Down and Veterans Treatment Courts that we are able to give yesterday's heroes a hand up and not a handout.
Not only do veterans bring their personal attributes of dependability, reliability, integrity, responsibility, effective communication, flexibility and leadership in the workforce. They also allow employers to qualify for certain tax incentives up to $9600 for tax benefits. They also allow employers to qualify for on-the-job training as well as nonpaid experience.
Most Americans profess to truly love our veterans, especially during gatherings at Memorial Day and Veterans Day. And while their feelings are usually sincere it is important to remember The veterans are defending us 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. The heroes that have been demonstrated time and again by veterans from the American Revolution to the global war on terrorism is sometimes unnoticed by those of us who enjoy the security that your sacrifice has provided. Our debt to these heroes can never be repaid or their gratitude and respect must last forever. For many veterans, our nation was important enough to ensure long separations from their families, miss the births of their children, freeze in sub-zero temperatures, bake in wild jungles, lose limbs and far too often lose their lives.
You can show your support for those great men and women by hiring a veteran in your workplace. Companies should understand that it's smart business to hire a veteran and when members of the Guard and Reserve deploy, it's America's business to ensure that their civilian careers do not suffer. In closing, I ask that you the next time you need to hire for your business consider hiring a veteran. And I leave you with this thought from Abraham Lincoln, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan.
Thank you
Turning then to the rest of our administrative agenda do I have Peter, Supervisor Adam wanted to pull A4 and A8 are there any other items that we want on the board? Do we have any public speaker slips for pulled items Mr. Allen?
0:29 – 0:3524 turns
Chair Hartman, members of the board. We have no requests to speak on the admin agenda from the public as we get started here today though I did want to note that we published an addendum to the agenda on Friday And this was related to our closed session today and this added an item regarding conference with labor negotiators Regarding employee organizations unrepresented managers and executives
Thank you then would you read a four into the record please?
Chair Hartman, members of the board. Item 8-4 is from behavioral wellness. It's to consider recommendations regarding a behavioral wellness fiscal year 17-18 Coast Valley Substance Abuse Treatment Center contract renewal.
Supervisor Adam?
If Dr. Glughorn would come up that'd be great. You know I usually in fact almost always pull these things because I got a problem in some respect and this one just for an atta boy. Atta doctor girl I guess. I love the performance and outcome measures. I think these are just what I wanted to see, and they're great, and they're honest, and there's nothing in here that is 100-100-100. This is the kind of work we need to see so we can tell whether or not we are getting anywhere. And I thank you very much.
And
then. Don't get used to it.
A8 Mr. Allen. Chair Hartman members the board item 8 is some planning and development this to consider recommendations regarding exempting one administrative professional from the civil service system.
OK go
ahead supervisor Adam
maybe somebody can explain to me why These qualities, I just want to read these qualities here. Highest standards of confidentiality, professionalism, institutional savvy, technical acumen, trustworthiness, individual commitment and compatibility with the department's directors and other executives. Aren't all our employees similarly endowed? Maybe somebody can explain to me why this one's special.
Madam Chair, we have a speaker from the department in Santa Barbara. Thank you Supervisor Wolf. Please
go ahead.
Madam Chair, members of the board Peter Cantle with Planning and Development and Dr. Russell and Ms. Black could not be here today I appreciate Supervisor Adams' concern. I think the key here is that confidentiality is critical, certainly the other attributes that are listed there also critical but confidentiality with regard to employee performance and other elements of personnel decisions that are made certainly key aspects of this job and I think That goes along with the need to have this person as an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the director and the assistant director.
Well just speaking for myself maybe, and perhaps other supervisors that being said you know we'd all like to have all of our employees be at that level because we deal with some pretty sensitive stuff In our offices from time to time. I'm sure the CEO would like to have people at will all the time because she's dealing with some pretty sensitive stuff, clerk of the boards office.
You know, you could go down the line and I think it could be said of any department head and maybe that's what we need to do is have all of the executive administrative professional classification be at will. I don't know but I'm not going to be able to support this because I don' see how this is different really fundamentally from many other department heads and indeed the supervisors offices themselves
CEO Miyasato would you care to comment?
Supervisor Adam and board members we have Andreas Piper assistant director from HR and he can respond to that but I just want to say that many of our executive positions in your offices, in my office are at will. But on the secretarial the assistant the AOP type of class I'll let Mr. Piper respond to that.
Good morning Supervisor Adam through the Chair. Yes, all administrative professionals they used to be known as executive assistants prior to the Administrative Office Professional reclassification in the early 2000s and all of them except this one are currently at will so the administrative professionals who do support all the department heads This is one of them that we are just bringing in line with the other And then all staff within the supervisorial offices are at will employees currently.
It actually, within section 27 of the code it actually lists and it does list staff within the supervisors' offices are at will at the moment.
Okay so it's not just the, see I was given to understand that it was only the chiefs of staff who
were
at will. Everybody in the office?
Yes everybody in your offices at
will. Alright and so this is a patch to bring P&D up with everybody else. Yes it is. Okay alright I'm sorry I will change my vote thank you. Thank you.
All right so I think that does it for all the pulled items, so may I have a motion to approve the balance of the administrative agenda?
0:35 – 0:4112 turns
So moved.
Second roll call vote Mr. Allen?
Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Mr Williams? Aye Ms Wolfe?
Aye
Ms. Hartman?
Aye.
Passes 5-0.
Thank you now it's a time for public comment on any items that are not on today's agenda so do we have any speaker slips Mr. Allen?
Sure, Hartman members of the board we have two requests this morning I'm going to start with Mary Bianchi to be followed by Bruce Corsaw
Good morning Chair and Supervisors, I'm Mary Bianchi County Director and Horticulture Advisor with the University of California Cooperative Extension for Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties. It's been with great pride that I have delivered these quarterly report summaries about our accomplishments of our advisors and staff with my upcoming retirement in June.
Future reports will be delivered to you by Dr. Catherine Soule, who has been appointed Director of Cooperative Extension Programs in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties beginning July 1. But briefly I'm here today with an update of activities during the first quarter of this year from January 1st to March 31st. Our programs reached 2,325 adults and 4,223 youth through face-to-face contacts and our web based e-newsletters and blogs reached more than 40,000 readers.
Our advisors are actively creating new knowledge with more than 20 research trials that will benefit Santa Barbara County agricultural producers. In a particular note, Dr. Mark Gaskell and Dr. Ben Faber are conducting research projects to investigate management of runoff water from agricultural tunnels. For small berry production in both the Santa Maria Valley and in Ventura County that will benefit the current discussion of regulations concerning the use of hoop structures outside the coastal zone. We're continuing to facilitate a multidisciplinary, multi-agency rapid response to the presence of Kuroshio shot hole borer disease complex in the Montecito area that threatens riparian agricultural and agricultural trees. And our Central Coast wine grapes planted on their own roots have supported some of the highest numbers of a plant parasitic nematode recorded in California, triggering the general use of resistant rootstocks.
Our viticulture advisor Mark Batney is exploring poorly performing vineyards on these resistant rootstocks for all the factors that may be leading to their poor performance. We continue to provide expertise to inform decisions by the Ag Preserve Review Committee and Agricultural Advisory Committee, as well as collaborating with your Santa Barbara County Planning and Building and Public Health Departments, the Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Programs Santa Barbara County and city fire in the Fire Safe Council, the City of Santa Maria Recreation and Parks, Santa Barbara County Food Bank, the Community Action Commission and Dignity Health Supported Nutrition Programs, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the coastal San Luis and Kachuma Resource Conservation Districts.
We believe our programs provide solutions to local problems that result in valuable improvements in the lives of our youth and our adult communities. And we thank you for your continued support of our programs.
Thank you very much.
Bruce Corso Madam Chair, members of the board. My name is Bruce Coruscant with Local 620. I came to discuss behavioral wellness, the issues that we've been having some of the concerns we have. I have been working for the local for 17 years. I have worked with many department heads. I've worked with many departments throughout those 17 years. We've had a lot of issues with ADMHS behavioral wellness In those 17 years, I've never seen it as worse as it is right now. Morale is at the all-time low.
You have a unique group of people employed that cares for their clients. That's their main goal. That has switched. Now their main goal is to watch their back and just try and get along. Daily, I am getting phone calls. My staff is getting phone calls. Over the years, we have worked with the county on labor management collaboratives with every department. We've always been successful. This is the first time that we've actually brought the CEO's office in as well as HR and we failed at labor management collaborative with this department.
Currently, we have a new policy coming your way. It's civil and respect in the workplace. I have shared this with our members. I currently have a list of 22 complaints ready for this policy to be approved so that we can file complaints in this department. We have some serious problems. During closed session today you will be doing a evaluation. The purpose of any evaluation is to improve the employee's performance.
I am hoping that this board will take the opportunity to actually conduct a 360 evaluation process utilizing peers, subordinates and local 620 in the evaluation. Our goal is to improve the conditions so our people can actually conduct their business and care for their clients at Behavioral Wellness. I believe a 360 is warranted, I believe attention by CEO's office more attention by CEOs office is warranted we have a serious problem let's try and fix it let's try and improve the situation thank you
0:41 – 0:489 turns
That concludes public comment.
Okay, so I'll close the public portion of our agenda and come back to the departmental issues and would you read the first one into the record Mr. Allen?
Chair Hartman and members of the board a departmental item number one is from Public Works and to the Board as the Board of Directors of the Water Agency it's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Quiama Valley Groundwater Basin groundwater sustainability agency formation this is in the 1st and 5th districts
Mr. Farrum are you making the presentation today or is Mr. Young?
We have Mr. Young coming in I think we have a number of members from the public as well with them There we are. Good morning, Madam Chair and members of the boards. Public Works, the water agency is back before you today for establishing the GSA for the Cuyama Basin. We've been working hard for several months on this. I might recognize that both Mr. Young and Ms. Crease have been working extremely hard on getting to this point with obviously with the staff of many of your offices as well. And with that, we'll turn it over to Mr. Young for a presentation and then we'll be available for questions after that.
Good morning. This item is
on the agenda to request board approval to form a groundwater sustainability agency or GSA in the Kiyama Valley Groundwater Basin. Over the past year, the water agency has collaborated with the other agencies that overlie the basin to form a GSA. These include the counties of San Luis Obispo, Kern and Ventura, the Kiyama Community Services District and the recently formed Kiyama Basin Water District.
The Kiama Basin Water District is a new agency formed by the majority of agricultural landowners in the basin to allow them to participate as a voting member of the GSA. Extensive negotiations over numerous working group meetings and significant public outreach have led to the development of a Joint Powers Agreement, or JPA that we believe is acceptable to all parties.
The JPA outlines the composition and voting structure of the GSA Board of Directors which has been the subject of the most intensive negotiation. Representatives of all parties have been able to agree on a compromise weighted voting structure that would allow the Keyama Basin Water District to seat all five of its board members on the GSA Board while preventing its voting power from dominating the GSA.
As shown on this table, the GSA Board of Directors will have a total of 11 members With a weighted voting structure. The Kiama Basin Water District would appoint five directors who would split 33% of the total votes. The water agency would appoint two directors splitting 22% of the votes. The remaining agencies would each appoint one director with 11% of the total vote.
In the interest of maintaining a broad consensus among the agencies, the JPA specifies that a 75% weighted vote is required for all major decisions. This compromise voting structure is supported by staff of all participating entities and has been agreed upon in principle by the Kiyama Basin Water District Board. If your board does not approve this JPA, it is unlikely that a new agreement could be negotiated by the state's June 30th deadline.
After June 30th, the State Water Resources Control Board would designate the basin as probationary and impose fee and reporting requirements on pumpers in the basin until a new GSA could be formed. The JPA allows the water agency to appoint two directors and two alternates but specifies that they be either an elected official or management staff. The basin overlies the first and fifth supervisorial districts based on discussions with supervisors and staff from these districts, staff recommends that first district supervisor Doss Williams serve as one of the water agencies appointees with his chief of staff Darcell Elliott as his alternate.
For the second appointment there's a slight deviation from the staff report in this slide. We recommend that 5th District Chief of Staff Corey Bantland be appointed as the second director with Supervisor Lavinino as his alternate. In summary, staff recommends that your board approve the JPA and resolution to form a groundwater sustainability agency in the Kiama Valley Groundwater Basin.
That you appoint by resolution Supervisor Doss Williams as a director of the GSA with Chief of Staff Darcelle Elliott as alternate. That you appoint by resolution 5th District Chief of Staff Corey Bantalan as director with Supervisor Lavinino as his alternate and that you determine these proposed actions are not a project under CEQA. Thank you and we are available to answer any questions that you may have.
Do any supervisors have questions? Madam Chair I do have a question. Please go ahead Supervisor Wolf Thank you.
I have a question, well first of all thank you to everyone who worked on this. And it seems that everyone is in agreement and that's obviously a good thing. The question I have has to do with Article 8, the Advisory Committee in the JPA. It says that the standing advisory committee is hereby established as a group of representatives who advise the GSA and shall be appointed by the board.
Was there any discussion during your meetings about how that advisory committee would be developed, the number of people who they would be representing? I'm not sure in Santa Maria who can answer that. But the JPA just seems very non-committal about this standing committee or this advisory committee that does seem to have a strong role
Madam Chair, Supervisor Wolf. We had extensive discussions about the advisory committee both among the working group and in separate public meetings with interested members of the public in the Cuyama Basin. We discussed having a broad geographic representation for various areas within the basin as well as representation for different land use types, different types of agriculture residents, rural residential.
So it's in the interest of all parties who are signing the JPA to have the broadest possible representation because it's something that DWR specifically requires for all GSAs. The GSA board itself will make the determination How large that advisory committee is and what the specific representation is. However we have extensive documentation from those three advisory committee for formation meetings that will guide their decision making process.
0:48 – 0:547 turns
OK thank you for that.
Seeing no other lights up here, I had a couple of questions. The first is once this action is taken by today's board does this come back to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors or is the JPA that governs the GSA in the hands of that board entirely?
Madam Chair, the JPA would control the GSA so it would not come back to your board unless requested for staff to come back for updates. So that your boards two appointees would be able to vote independently.
Okay do we have any public comments?
Chair Hartman, members of the board we have eight requests to speak. We're going to start this morning in Santa Barbara with Lisa Valencia-Sherratt be followed by Lynn Carlisle.
Good morning Chair Hartman, Board of Supervisors. I'm Lisa Valencia-Sharrett here officially today as Quiama Valley Family Resource Center Co-Executive Director and unofficially as former First District Office Liaison for Quiama Valley for former Supervisor Carbajal. Either way I'm here to officially thank you, the board and staff, specifically our staff Matt, Ray, Tom and also Jane from Dudek for years of efforts, resources, collaborations and patience to get us where we are today. From the USPS study years ago To community forums, meetings negotiations with culminate day. So I and we especially appreciate your willingness to work directly with the community and help make this very complex groundwater legislation as clear as possible.
So our only request would thank you for asking. Is that an advisory committee is established as soon as possible? And thank you, Matt, for clarifying that the work group notes will be used to guide that. So we from both the FRC who represent the low income community and the former first district office feel and felt that a strong advisory committee that does represent Thank you very much. It's been a long process and it's an honor to be here today on the other side.
Good morning Madam Chair, Supervisors. My name is Lynn Carlisle and I'm the Co-Executive Director of the Quiama Valley Family Resource Center. We serve hundreds of primarily low income children and families throughout the Quiama Valley. I'm here today first to thank the Board and the staff for the hard work that has gone into formation of the proposed Quiama Valley Good morning, everyone. I'm Barbara County Board of Supervisors. And I'm here to speak on behalf of the Grand Water Sustainability Agency. I believe the community appreciates the effort and energy that has gone into this process and every effort has been made Secondly, I'd like to voice my support for the voting structure that is outlined in the joint powers agreement. It appears to be the best available compromise.
We hope that it will effectively serve the shared purpose of creating a fair and actionable groundwater sustainability plan that will bring this critically overdrafted Puyama Basin into balance and ensure a healthy water supply for all stakeholders in the community including the children and families served by the Family Resource Center. Third, I'd like to express my support for the appointment of Supervisor Williams as a director of the GSA and with his Chief of Staff Marcel Eliadele as alternate. And the recent change to appoint the Chief of Staff Cory Bantland and Supervisor Len Lavinino as alternate I believe that having our local elected officials serving on the GSA will help to ensure that constituents are fairly represented on this budget.
It's essential that the GSA be a strong and well-established agency from the very beginning, as it will be passed with the important work of restoring an aquifer that is one of the most critically overdrafted basins in the entire state. Finally, I would ask the board to urge the GSA once formed to establish an advisory committee as soon as possible. This committee is stipulated in the JPA and the community is ready to serve on such a committee.
The county's been very helpful over the past two years to work with the Yama Valley Community Association to conduct multiple town hall meetings to educate the community about stigma and the formation of the GSA and the creation of a DSP. It is now an informed and activated community that is ready to provide input and local knowledge to the GSA and the GSB.
0:54 – 1:005 turns
Back to Santa Maria for Ann Meyer and Roberta Jaffe to follow.
Hi, good morning supervisors. Thank you for this opportunity to speak. I am here representing my family who has been in the Cuyama Valley for quite a long time but not many many people in the Cuyama Valley have been there for countless generations prehistorical people Really. We support the formation of this JPA as the best available method for meeting the requirements of SGMA and I was personally heartened to see that all five members of the Water Board are going to be able to serve on the JPA because I think they represent varying interests Some moderate-sized fruit orchard, our families in cattle ranching. There's some vegetable growers and I think all of them bring a lot of expertise to staff.
And then to reiterate what your first two speakers have mentioned I would like to see the advisory board to the JPA GSA is mandated by the state. It's not an alternative but I would really like to see widespread representation, not just into the USGA study area but there is that whole other portion of the basin that needs to be managed And so I think you need residents in the valley representing smaller properties, just residents and then the west end Cottonwood area.
So that would be my recommendation that those people are strongly considered and I think having been at all three advisory meetings Talking about this issue that there's wide support for that in the local area. Thank you very much.
Our next speaker is Roberta Jaffe followed by Steve Gleisman.
Good morning, good morning Madam Chair and Supervisors. I want to thank you and thank the staff for the important time and energy you've put into the Cuyama Valley and especially that situation currently there and the opportunity to actually develop a sustainable water plan for the Cuyama Valley. I'm a resident and farmer on the west end of the valley in Cottonwood Canyon And while other geographical areas of the Cuyama Valley have other seats on the GSA, the west end of the valley will only be represented by the Board of Supervisors, by the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. So you're our very important link to the decisions and the plans that will happen. I especially thank the two supervisors representing the valley for Their willingness to step up and to be present as these decisions are made.
We're very concerned on the West End about the land use change changes currently taking place there and they need to be considered in an important part of the GSP that's developed. We have thousands of acres of what historically has been dry rangeland being transformed into highly intensive irrigated vineyards And in land that has been the common knowledge for years is that there's not the water there to sustain us. This is going to have a tremendous impact on many of us on the West End and since there aren't a lot of studies out there of water and monitoring of wells, that we really don't know what the long-term impacts are going to be on the whole valley. So these changes are happening now they've happened since Sigma's past. They'll happen before a GSP is in place so it's something that the board I think not only needs to pay attention to in terms of the GSP but I also would really like to encourage you to be aware of what's going on right now and the different permit applications that are into the different county departments.
I also want to reiterate what people have mentioned already about the advisory committee. We think it's really, really important. We also think it's important that it's made up of the different geographic locations of the Cuyama Valley because there are so many diverse interests there and that it mainly be made up of the residents So the residents truly have a voice in the planning that's going forward. They're families that have been in the Cuyama Valley for hundreds, for 100 years and their voices need to be heard and and their knowledge considered as we move forward with this plan.
I think that's my main points and again thank you. We look forward as residents working with the GSA as we develop the plan. Thank you very much.
Steve Gleisman to be followed by Randall Tognazzini
1:00 – 1:067 turns
Good morning, and thank you once again Madam Chairman and the rest of the supervisors. And to all of the staff who've been working very hard on this project and will continue to do so I'm sure. I'm from a resident and farmer on the west end of the Cuyama Valley in the Cottonwood Canyon area and many of the same Observations and considerations that previous speakers have put forward, I want to follow up on those as well.
It's been a long process to develop where we're at now with the GSA But it's really just a beginning. And especially with the land use changes that have taken place on the West End since this process began, you know with the Harvard project now posing a potential impact and the one thing I really want to recommend is that we continue to look at the integrity of the entire basin as a whole unit, as a whole watershed And be really aware of the scientific evidence that exists for that integrity, the linkages between all parts of that valley.
So that as we move forward in the development of a GSP, we really take into account that whole integrity, that whole interaction of the parts especially what's now happening on the west end and I also want to I agree with what people said about the need for the development of an advisory committee that allows the voices that are not currently represented now on the GSA to be heard.
And being from Santa Barbara County, I'm really going to be counting on our Two supervisor districts for being that voice for us, but I think we can also add a lot through the advisory committee based in practical experience and long-term understanding and relationships of what it means to be members of that community in the Cuyama Valley. That's all I have to say thank you.
Our next speaker is Randall Tognazzini followed by Pamela Baksik.
Good
morning. I've become aware that I may have a recusal issue here so out of an abundance of caution, I am going to recuse myself from this item. So thank you very much.
Good morning. I hate to have people recused just because I stand up. My name is Randall Tognazzini. I live in Roy Grandy, California. I have a second home in Acreage and Cottonwood Canyon and the Tognazzini family is celebrating this year 100 years in Cottonwood Canyon. There's not much any of us in this room can do today to change what's before us. I will use my time to make a statement and pose a few questions.
Three legislative bills were put into law collectively to define the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, SGMA, in September of 14. You are here today to form and staff the GSA. The Cuyama Basin is not your only GSA within your jurisdiction. I find it interesting that our legislature and our governor found it important to form SGMA but have not done anything to preserve water We happen to be in a year where there is enough water, snow melt that we could fill multiple dams and reservoirs throughout California that could be released in a manner that would do wonders to replenish water basins that are in or perhaps in overdraft.
I find SGMA in its trickle-down theory an establishment for more regulation, a vehicle to tax our well water usage and ultimately will make determination on how many carrots or grapes or other crops one can plant. It does nothing to capture available water that falls from the sky. USGS has done considerable work on water and water basins. Who will take precedent, USGS or SGMA? Who has done the most research?
How are six GSA's for just the Cuyamma Basin alone that are developing a GSP going to coordinate and agree to a logical GSP that somewhat matches USGS? What input will the advisory committee members have that will end up in the GSB? What expertise will the members of the GSA and the advisory committee members have that will truly impact decisions made in this and other basins?
I am an advocate for realistic agriculture. I'm for water conservation and a strong advocate for water quality. This is my definition of sustainable and available water and usable water. Thank you for your time.
Mr. Gazzone, did you have something you wanted to say?
Chair Hartman Supervisors I just wanted to clarify that Supervisor Adams departure from the room and he asked me to clarify that his recusal issue is wanting to have the opportunity to examine whether he or his family have any property interest that would be impacted by this. So just through an abundance of caution he stepped out and recused from this matter. That doesn't mean that after analysis he might not have an opportunity to vote on things downstream in a future meeting
1:06 – 1:116 turns
Pamela Baksak to be followed by Jean Zanon.
Thank you for the opportunity to speak, thank you board members and staff for all your hard work on the GSA and the JPA writing the JPA I'd just like to request that you do approve the voting structure as agreed upon by the I would also thank Supervisor Williams for his request to be appointed and designating his staff member, Darcelle Elliott. And thank you for the 5th District for designating their alternate.
I would also request that you form the advisory committee as soon as possible and it be representative of all the residents in the Quiama Valley. Thank you.
Jeanne Zannon, be followed by Derek Urosik who is our final speaker.
Madam Chairman and members of the board my name is Jeanne Zannon. Our family has owned property in the Basin from the early 80's and have been growing pistachios there since 1991. I'm here to support the JPA. I think given the circumstances the two supervisors that are going to be representing in the voting structure Did a magnificent job. And I also think the staff has done a great job given the circumstances.
Something came out in the meeting that we had last Monday regarding the status of the advisory committee and how that might work. On one hand, a prominent member of the community, Nukuyama voiced concern that the voting structure only allowed one vote for somebody that actually lived in the valley. That was of a concern and quite frankly I'm satisfied that between the advisory committee and supermajority voting structure, that I don't personally have a problem with that.
The other comment was from one of the recent growers in fact the most recent industrial grower that moved into the valley who came from Arizona Had a lot of experience in terms of water issues and really was surprised and disappointed that the growers did not have more than 50% majority in terms of the voting structure. So we have that dichotomy I think where The problem arises is a general mistrust of the things that have happened in the past relative to the development of agriculture and the valley all the way going back recent years when the major growers took their wells out of this study itself, presumably with the hope that there wouldn't be enough data to really verify and validate this study. We also see new above-ground pipelines going up.
We see a lot of new what was in the past grazing land being converted into what I suspect is gonna be irrigated land. We see, as had been previously stated, huge reservoirs going in. I think we're up to like 150 million gallons of storage in the last couple of years So among all those things I think there's genuine concern with the community that this is not going to be something that is game, that there's going to be a genuine effort on everybody's part to make this work and that's gonna mean cutting back on water. And that's gonna have implications financially but it's gonna have more dire implications in terms of the community itself if we run out of water. Thank you so much.
Good morning, Madam Chair and Supervisors. Thank you for allowing me to speak today. My name is Derek Urosic. I represent Bolthouse Properties and I am the president of the Cuyama Basin Water District. We first want to thank all the county staff for their efforts in time that they put into this process into getting us to this point today. We want to express our support of the JPA as agreed upon in our efforts to work through the process of creating the GSP going forward.
Part of the discussion and a lot of conversations took place around the fact that the number of votes and the percentage of those votes. We as a district, and it's been expressed by others are very strongly believe in the value of the five representatives to the board coming from the Quiama Basin Water District. The purpose of that is express shows a good diversity of both landowners small and big Um, diverse in the regions that they come from within an 88,000 acre water district. And then as well as it shows the different permanent crop grazing and row crop growing.
So we want to express that support. We thank you for working through that staff. And finally we want a comment that's been reiterated. We do support the advisory committee. We would like to see that active as soon as possible. We'll work through that. We believe that should be a diverse group representing the entire valley And are looking forward to make that happen. So thank you very much, have a great day.
That concludes public comment.
1:12 – 1:177 turns
Thank you Supervisor Williams.
The piece is broken out in the Middle East. No just in the Kiyama Valley but that's also quite an accomplishment I you know, I have heard obviously the unease in everyone's voice this is a matter that could have come to the board as A titanic battle between the desires of residents to have a more progressive one person, one vote structure and landowners to have a more stakeholder based voting structure.
I would not normally support a voting structure that is Thank you very much. Our participation is that we are seeing a sort of resurgence in interest about from both large landowners and residents in groundwater sustainability. And I think the real I just want to make sure that the logic or value of the law is just that it forces us to look in a 20 year time span and present a plan that shows sustainability over that time. And to the one speaker, Mr. Tognizzini there is some opportunities for creation of water quote unquote The plan has and what the water district does in terms of spreading basins or other ways to percolate more water into the groundwater basin. I mean there are, there is ways through this process for us to protect our water supplies The other note I wanted to make is just for the residents that live outside the CSD including those at the west end Cottonwood Canyon.
Roberta's right, were there only Direct representation and so we feel like there is an importance to deal with all the issues that are being identified out there. And in my view part of that is we really have to look at Understanding if the county has really the right process for wells. You know it's kind of interesting that we're talking about the crisis right now but you couldn't tell from our process of how we approve Wells right you couldn't tell that we're in a in a crisis because we don't even ask for criteria or metering at this point and those I think are an important loose end in this whole process.
But I do think it's pretty amazing that after all the contentiousness, all the meetings that we came together. We figured out something that could work to balance those interests and hopefully that means we can work together to have a really good solid plan that protects both the economy and the water supply of the Kiyama Valley. And that is my hope and that's what we're going to be working for.
Supervisor Lavanino.
Thank you Madam Chair, I just have a couple of questions for staff and then some comments so prior one of the things that was brought up with some of the West End land use changes prior to creation of the GSP what exactly are we doing as far as well monitoring now on the West End?
Madam Chair, Supervisor Lavanino As you may know, we pursued a basin boundary modification with DWR to divide the basin basically between the west end and the main basin. That modification was rejected by DWR so since that time we've started to put together a monitoring network of roughly 30 monitoring wells working with local landowners to get access to their wells and so we're starting to put together a better picture of how groundwater flows in that portion of the basin.
Are we also looking at quality, or is it mostly quantity at this point? And will quantity reflect quality?
Madam Chair, Supervisor Lavenino. Typically, quality will decline as groundwater declines, however that is not always the case. We are currently just monitoring groundwater levels at this point. However, there are opportunities to add some of these wells into our ongoing countywide groundwater monitoring system which does include quality for a certain number of wells.
1:17 – 1:2216 turns
So I got a question about like when we're getting updates on the overview of the basin and those things. Will they still come to this board or will this now almost all be handled through
our
newly created GSA?
Madam Chair, Supervisor Lavagnino, this will be handled by the newly created GSA that's the JPA structure creates essentially a new agency however staff is happy to return with updates as requested by your board
okay All right so just my comments on this first off I want to thank staff here. Thank you Ben. Almost overly responsive to the community and I also want to appreciate Supervisor Williams for taking a lead in this as well. You know, I took it a little bit different approaches. I looked at this is the community what I didn't want to see and what didn't happen thankfully was a top-down approach of where we come in and say this is the way it's going to be because I don't think anything like that would work too well so I think what ended up happening is a compromise that allowed for everybody to, I guess one of the signs of a good compromise is not everybody's completely happy with the situation but everybody feels like it might be the best thing that we could have achieved.
So I think we were successful there. You know I do want to stress that there is also a lot of work still ahead. A 75% voting hurdle is very difficult to achieve and you're trying to figure out, I'm looking at these numbers trying to figure out how that's going to happen but you know what? I never thought we would and if this deadline didn't exist we probably would have never thought hey there's some way we're gonna be able to form a GSA and have everybody agree on it either so There is hope. You know I just want to let the folks on the West End also know that you know I realize what our role is here, we basically are your voice and also that I will also be looking to see that advisory council crop up as quick as we can put it together and that it will have… I think when one person said that it needs experts on it You know, sometimes experts are mostly the people that have the local knowledge.
And so I obviously know very little about that area but I'm sure the people that have been farming there and working there and living there for decades and some of you more than decades will be coming to you for a lot of that knowledge. Very surprised when this thing first started I did not think that there would be a meeting like this. I figured there'd be a lot of pitchforks and torches out there so this worked out pretty well and it's a testament to the community as well as the staff professionalism that got us to this point.
Supervisor Wolf, did you have anything you wanted to add?
No, Madam Chair. I was just happy to hear the response about the advisory committee and I trust as speakers had mentioned that this will be something that will be developed in one of the early meetings and
That's it thank you. Thank you I wanted to add my appreciation to everybody in the community who works so hard and to Supervisor Williams and his staff who I know also invested a great deal here. I am very interested, I have great confidence in the 5th and 1st district Delegates to the JPA to make decisions on behalf of the community. But I'm interested in having a comparative look at the different GSAs and how they function and advisory committees so at some appropriate time 8, 9, 10 months down the road if you could report back to us on what's happening so that we get a sense of the breadth of how different Parts of our county are addressing groundwater sustainability that would be much appreciated.
And so I think we're ready for a motion as amended with Supervisor Lavanino as the delegate.
So moved the staff recommendation with the amendment of Steve Lavanino as the alternate in the 5th district.
I'll
second.
And roll call vote please.
The record reflects that Supervisor Adam recused himself and did not participate. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Mr. Williams? Aye. Ms. Wolk?
Aye,
Ms. Hartman?
Aye Thank you and I think we'll just keep going for item number two on our agenda
1:22 – 1:2813 turns
Chair Hartman members of the board. Item 2 is from public works and to the board as the Board of Directors of the water agency it's a hearing to consider recommendations going to be Santa Maria groundwater basin fringe groundwater sustainability agency formation 3rd 4th and 5th districts and we're gonna go
We'll pause just a moment while we get supervisor and Supervisor Wolf did you have anything you wanted to say? I saw you perhaps you might. No, I'm good thank you. Okay just checking in it's a little harder when we're not all in the same place. Yes I appreciate that thank you.
I'm just going to make an announcement that I'm going to recuse myself for lack of knowledge of where the actual boundaries are and whether I have properties that are covered by the fringe area. So I'm just going to recuse myself out of a bunch of caution in this one as well.
Thank you Supervisor and Mr. Farrer
Yes Madam Chair members of the board again for the Santa Maria Fringe we will also have Mr. Young give a presentation on the GSA formation for Santa Maria Fringe
This item is on the agenda to request board approval to form a GSA in a portion of the Santa Maria Groundwater Basin. The majority of water users in the basin have undergone the lengthy legal process of adjudication of their groundwater rights and are therefore not subject to most of the requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Act. Groundwater Management Act or SGMA. However, the boundary of the adjudication does not completely match with the basin boundary as defined in the California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 118 leaving fringe areas which are not managed pursuant to the adjudication.
In Santa Barbara County, most of these fringe areas are along the Kiama River below Twitchell, along Tepiscay Creek and along a reach of the Sisquiock River. There is also a narrow fringe along the southern and western edges of the Adjudicated Basin. Larger fringe areas are located in the county of San Luis Obispo, and we anticipate that the county of San Luis Obispo and the city of Oro Grande will form GSAs in these areas over the next month.
The intent is in filing as a GSA with DWR would be to avoid state intervention in these areas. If no GSA covers the fringe areas by June 30th, groundwater users will be subject to the state's onerous fees and reporting requirements included as attachment B to your board agenda letter. As a sole entity forming a GSA, your board would act as the GSA Board. Staff would bring recommendations and request for policy guidance to the board as needed.
The fringe areas represent a small portion of overall basin water use, and it is unclear what meaningful management preparation of the groundwater sustainability plan would accomplish in these areas. Staff intends to work with the County of San Luis Obispo and landowners in these areas to better understand how these areas affect the adjudicated basins. We will work with these stakeholders to explore options for these areas with DWR and the State Board, and this may deviate from a standard GSP.
Because some of these areas appear to be inappropriately included in Bulletin 118, we would also explore a basin boundary modification in 2018 primarily along the southern and western boundaries. In summary, staff recommends that the Water Agency Board approve the resolution to form a GSA in the Santa Maria Groundwater Basin non-adjudicated fringe and determine that the proposed action is not a project pursuant to CEQA. Thanks and I'm available to answer any questions.
Do we have any board questions? Mr. Young did DWR suggest that this is a good way forward?
Madam Chair, DWR and the state board are very clear that every portion of a basin that they have designated to be medium or high priority must be covered by GSA or by judgment. In this case, the judgment does not cover the whole basin and so they have made it clear. And in fact the state board wrote a letter to your board last week indicating that these areas do in fact need to be covered.
DWR has not given guidance on what to do with these fringe areas. We're not the only basin with them, they exist throughout the state primarily in Southern California and so we'll be working with other counties that are dealing with this and talking to DWR about specifically what they want in these areas because again it is unclear. And
San Luis Obispo they are forming their own GSA for the other part and there's no advantage in doing it together I suppose?
Madam Chair, we did have discussions to that end. But their areas are more substantial and in addition, their county has voted to provide substantial financial assistance to these GSAs. And so their intended level of effort and need to manage their areas exceeds ours in our much smaller areas. We found an advantage to form separate GSAs with the option to do a coordinating agreement to form a single GSP if needed.
And Supervisor Lavagnino, I'm going to let you go first if I've seen the lights.
I just had one question so why were these small pieces of property left out of the original adjudication or do we know?
Supervisor Lavagnino I am not party to all of the extensive legal actions over 15 plus years but my understanding is that the agreement was a stipulated agreement and so some of these landowners may not have stipulated the agreement in addition there are some boundary decisions that are geologic judgment calls. And so there are some areas where the hydrogeologists mapping the adjudicated basin may have chosen to end their basin at a fault, whereas DWR who is simply mapping alluvium may have not particularly looked at that or seen that and just mapped the alluvium up these river valleys.
1:28 – 1:357 turns
Seeing no more lights do we have any public speaker slips.
Chair Hartman members the board with three requests to start with Chip Wolbrandt to be followed by Andy Caldwell and then Ken Huff.
Madam Chair, members of the board, Chip Wolbrant. We fairly recently discovered that our clients' properties are within this fringe area we thought that as a result of the very detailed Santa Maria Basin adjudication this issue had been taken care of and to answer Supervisor Lavagnino's question the answer is better science There were there was very detailed science which map the boundaries of the base and unfortunately in and if any of you know way perhaps former Assemblymember future state senator there may be some tweaks necessary for sigma this maybe one.
But I thank you all. I think your staff for jumping on this issue and for doing what I expect will be sort of a placeholder to try and correct this with DWR. I ask you to do have a Santa Barbara County only effort so that we can continue to work with your excellent county water agency staff and hopefully clear this up. Thank you
Mr. Caldwell to be followed by Ken
Madam Chair, members of the board. I'm Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. I want to kind of speak to the elephant in the room or maybe the elephant that's missing from the room. I don't know if anybody other than Supervisor Adam that knows more about this whole process and yet he himself doesn't know if he is in the fringe area or not. We've got major landowners that didn't know there was a fringe area.
And to Supervisor Lavinino's we can't get really great answers as to why there's a fringe area. I mean that the we have landowners that had to pay into the legal fight on the adjudication and they paid one way and now they're in the fringe area so they got it coming and going in one thing. We think that one of the first things that needs to be done immediately is landowners need to be notified that they're in the fringe area That way maybe Supervisor Adam who knows more about this than anybody could still be on the dais, or maybe he won't be on the dais. But how is it that we don't know?
And and you know the issue here is some of these areas don't even have any water. And so we think that you know at most we do support the county doing what they're doing today but some of these landowners may have wanted to do what Quiama did, they may have wanted to form their own district but they didn't know they were in the fringe area. And I think that it'd be really good if the county water agency or somebody could do a map and send out a notice to the people, the owners of those parcels so that they would know. And of course this would only apply to Santa Barbara County but that they would at least know. And we do ask Supervisor Williams you've got connections in Sacramento. This thing's a mess.
It's a total mess that of how it's crossing county lines adjudication lines fringe areas in between. It just you know the thing is you can't manage something like this and so we would hope that those fringe areas in Santa Barbara County as you can see there's barely no real estate between the adjudication and the county line. We'd like to put those get those adjusted because we do believe they're on the same basin I'm in drawing from the same water so they should be we believe grandfathered under the adjudication. We'd hope the county would exert some leadership so maybe to minimize the cost of staff dealing with this fringe because it's not that big in our county and we think it should have been part of the adjudicated basin and they shouldn't have to be doing this thank you.
Ken Huff. Mr. Huff's our final speaker. Oh wait, pardon me we have a late slip from Jane
Baxter. Good morning Chair Hartman and Supervisors I'm Ken Huff speaking on behalf of the Santa Barbara County Action Network for 15 years SB CAN has been working to help create sustainable communities Andy just said he sees this as a mess. I see it as an opportunity. Let me explain. A big part of sustainability is to have good quantity and good quality water to serve the needs of the vast farmland in our valley, and the needs of 200,000 people who live in the region served by this groundwater basin.
So today I'm here to support the staff recommendation to form a GSA for the non-adjudicated fringe. And I'd like you to consider some additional measures as well. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act is intended, as the name clearly indicates, to ensure that underground aquifers remain sufficient in quantity and at least adequate in quality to meet our municipal and agricultural needs.
Last year and the year before SBCAN gave input at the public meetings regarding the annual report on the Santa Maria Valley Management Area, commonly referred to as the Scalmanini Report. We raised concerns about the long-term drop in the water level in our basin But under the terms of adjudication, drought is not allowed to be a consideration. If water users are taking more than they're allowed to take and that's why the level is dropping then something can be ordered to be done about it but if the water level is dropping due to drought then according to the stipulation nothing can be done.
That means that no single entity is providing overall solutions to the declining groundwater levels during times of drought and that's a big gap in groundwater management So as to the opportunity, we hope you'll take this opportunity to address that gap and create a plan for dealing with the entire Santa Maria Groundwater Basin along with the fringe area. We hope that the formation of a groundwater sustainability agency for the fringe and other measures you may take to address the entire basin will result in better management of all variables affecting groundwater.
Decision makers need to consider The quantity and quality of the water in the entire basin. And our water needs beyond the confines of the stipulation agreement. Accordingly, we would support the concept that was mentioned by staff of coordinating an agreement with SLO to create one plan. The board letter states that it's unclear what can be accomplished by preparing a GSP for the fringe.
Since sustainability of the fringe is dependent on sustainability of the whole basin, we hope the preparation of the GSP will open a larger dialogue. Thank you very much.
1:35 – 1:429 turns
Okay.
We're going to make copies because we can't put that on the screen right
now. Or the fringe. It's a map that shows the watershed for that groundwater basin, which touches four counties includes four of the districts except for Santa Barbara and that it makes you realize Four of the five districts are a participant in providing clean water for the groundwater basin. So, oh here we go the time's going I'm sorry I thought they were gonna so I encourage you to accept the staff recommendation. I disagree with Ken on one thing usually we're fairly compatible thinkers but I would like to see two separate GSAs developed one for each county and that would trigger the portion of the law that requires Collaborative basin-wide planning, which is missing now because the three management districts seem to function as if they were managing separate aquifers where in reality it's all one bathtub and numerous straws going down into it.
They don't meet, they don't discuss basin wide issues and if we create two GSAs, one in San Luis, one there that would trigger the law that would require Uh, a collaborative process for management of the basin. And that's the biggest thing the county can accomplish with this would be to improve the basin wide planning on this I think it's absolutely crucial And that the fact that the vast majority of the basin will not have a sustainability plan.
And this would allow at least some coordination and sustainability planning, and they're key reasons why Basin is in dire need of sustainability planning. One is the last annual report for the Santa Maria management area considers groundwater levels and chronic decline. The state has identified a high nitrate levels, a significant water quality issue. The nitrates levels continue to rise That's a real sustainability challenge. Current SMA management does not raise the issue of long-range sustainability planning to address anticipated climate change or sea level rise. This could be accomplished with the involvement of the county and annual discussion of industry impacts in the annual report of the Santa Maria Valley Basin omits any mention of potential oil industry impacts.
We have over 1,000 oil wells that have been drilled through our drinking water aquifer that are at risk of leaks or blowouts and each year with more wells being drilled the ARA project will be dilled directly into the aquifer That this is not considered part of sustainability planning. No study has been conducted of the resource sustainability after a major quake. We're 30 miles from the San Andreas Fault, even closer with the watershed of this- And that is your time. Okay and we need to have a plan for earthquake preparedness as part of sustainability so thank you for addressing this issue.
Thank you Mr. Young did you have any comments you'd like to make in response to what you heard from the public?
Madam Chair, Supervisors just one comment that we did pursuant to the requirements of DWR and we did notify and send mailers to all the landowners in the fringe area. And that's kind of an expansive definition in the fringe area including parcels that were split by the adjudication boundary I think that's some of the source of confusion on what's in and what's out is that The boundary defined by the adjudication splits and quite a few parcels. I mean so there is some confusion on what's in and what's out based on a reading of the adjudication.
We also held two public meetings in concert with San Luis Obispo County at which were quite well attended by landowners and we did contact interested parties in the basin prior to this hearing.
Supervisor Lavanino.
Thank you Madam Chair. Well the history of this basin is long and expensively has been millions and tens of millions of dollars have probably been spent adjudicating this basin so I'm going to if there's no other comments, I mean I don't think you go back and reopen this entire basin because you've got 0.1% that's outside the boundary You know 99.9% of this is already been adjudicated so this is a slight boundary change and on some of these areas I see probably out in the east there's absolute, I don't think there's any water out there to start with. So there's a reason why there is a, the state's allowing us to as long as you have an adjudicated basin is to move forward we have an adjudicated basin some of the boundary has to be moved.
I trust our staff to be able to do that In a fair manner so if nobody else has a comment I will or when you do I will be ready to move this item with staff recommendation.
Supervisor Williams I see you're thinking about it.
Well if that's a motion, I'll just second. It seems like it is belt and suspenders to some folks but at least that will require us to put our heads together and figure out a worthy GSB so I suppose that's looking at the bright side of more work but I think it's what we got and it's the best thing we've got right now
1:42 – 3:1012 turns
Okay I do have a question about the relationship between Sigma and adjudicated basins. I'm sure there's no easy answer to that but that'll be part of what you're exploring through this process once we make today's decision is that correct?
Madam Chair that's correct. SGMA does exempt adjudicated basins from the majority of the requirements of SGMA, they do have some specific reporting requirements that they need to meet and but again the fringe areas are not intended by the legislation at least by our reading to open up the entire basin to management. The intent is simply to cover those areas that are not covered by the adjudication.
Thank you. Supervisor Wolf just checking in. I'm good thank you. Okay. Supervisor Lavinino make the motion.
Motion's been made for staff recommendation.
And a second from Mr. Williams? Okay call the roll please.
Supervisor Adams has recused himself, Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Mr. Williams? Aye Ms. Wolfe? Ms. Hartman?
Aye.
Passes four ayes with one recusal.
Okay and that concludes our open agenda would you explain what we're doing in closed session Mr. Gazzone and the change to the agenda?
Chair Hartman and Supervisors, today in closed session the board has agendized to consider five items. Two of them are existing litigation, Dominguez versus County of Santa Barbara and Yorks versus County of Santa Barbara. You have a third item, anticipated litigation conference with legal counsel. You have one public employee performance evaluation for Department of Behavioral Wellness Director Alice Gleghorn And as clerk of the board noted Friday's addendum to the closed session agenda was to add conference with labor negotiators for unrepresented managers and executives. The county's designated representatives are CEO Miyasato and Human Resources Director Gentles that is all.
Thank you so we will adjourn to closed session and come back and report on the results of the closed session after we finish.
You. Yeah. Hi. Yeah. ♪ You you Good morning. Hi. . Yeah. you you And. you Okay. Hi. You. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. ♪ You ♪ you Good morning. ♪ . Okay. you Bye! You. You. Yeah. You. you You. ♪ You Okay. Good morning. Music
3:20 – 3:213 turns
Let's see. Is that it? Yeah we're reconvening the May 9th meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors after closed session Mr. Gazzone would you report out please?
Chair Hartman and Supervisors, the board today in closed session considered five separate items. Two were workers' compensation cases, the first Dominguez v. County of Santa Barbara, the second Yorks v. County of Santa Barbara. There was one item of anticipated litigation, one public employee performance evaluation for Department of Behavioral Wellness Director Alice Gleghorn, and through Friday's addendum to the closed session agenda conference with labor negotiators concerning unrepresented managers and executives there are no reportable actions.
Thank you. We stand adjourned until next week in Santa Barbara.