BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 February 13, 2018

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:01 – 0:021 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:37 · ≈ 9:01 AM

♪ Music Hi. Hi.

0:03 – 0:0714 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:38 · ≈ 9:03 AM

All right, ladies and gentlemen I'd like to welcome you to the February 13th meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Happy Valentine's Day, go get your cards don't get in trouble. Mr. Allen can we get a roll call please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Mr. Adam? Here. Mr Lavinino? Here. Ms Wolfe? Here Ms Hartman? Here And Mr Williams in Santa Barbara?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:01 · ≈ 9:04 AM

I'm here,

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈31s recited, not transcribed
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:03 · ≈ 9:04 AM

how are you guys? Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:28 · ≈ 9:04 AM

All right, let's move to the approval of the minutes. There are some questions, Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:33 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I'm looking at the item that dealt with the cannabis ordinance and there was reference to attachment A. And I just wanted to clarify the language being That there was consideration of language regarding the capping of retail permits to eight. Regarding just the consideration of capping, so it was to consider that language. So I just wanted to make that clarification to the minutes.

And then I'll move the minutes with that clarification.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.855:12 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Second?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.835:13 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Yeah, I think that was the intent definitely. So guess we have to do a roll call on everything. So let's roll call the minutes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:22 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Mr. Adam?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.835:23 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:24 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Ms. Wolfe? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.835:30 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Aye Alright, Ms. Misato do we have a CEO's report?

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction5:36 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Good morning Supervisors, we have a quick report and this is just to re-emphasize our storm readiness plan. It's been widely disseminated through the media which we appreciate and that's last week we announced a new storm evacuation definition for those areas affected by the Thomas Burn area it's a 72 hour storm evacuation timeline with interactive map on our website At this time, the National Weather Service is reporting there are expected storm systems coming in but they're weakening. And presently no evacuations are anticipated in these areas impacted by debris flow or in the burn areas. But we're asking people to keep a watch on our website. You can see all the information on readysbc.org. That concludes my report.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.836:20 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Great, thank you very much. We'll move to Mr. Allen. Are there any changes and addendums to the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:27 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Chair Lavinino, members of the board. We did post an addendum on Friday and there were two changes to the agenda today. First on item A3 this is from the county executive office this is the second reading of the ordinance regarding the tax on cannabis operations and we just wanted a note and indicated that it's a four-fifths vote required in this item. And secondly we added a departmental item to the agenda number five Also from the county executive office this will be a hearing to consider recommendations during the Human Services Commission update And it's my understanding that we're going to take this out of order this morning and move this up to be considered as our first departmental item all

0:07 – 0:1111 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:05 · ≈ 9:07 AM

right outstanding and Let's move. We have an honorary resolution today a 14 Claiming the month of February 2018 is Black History Month in Santa Barbara County Can I get a motion to move a 14, please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:20 · ≈ 9:07 AM

So moved Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:22 · ≈ 9:07 AM

Moved and seconded, roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:25 · ≈ 9:07 AM

Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Ms. Wolfe? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:36 · ≈ 9:07 AM

Aye All right very good And I think we have Pastor Ron Wiley here and Pastor Louis Watkins down in Santa Barbara. And we also have with us today Chief Master Sergeant Deanna Mosley, she's in attendance wanted to recognize her as well. And Mr. Allen could you read 814 into the record please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:02 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Chair Labonino, members of the board. I'll note this is a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Williams and I will go ahead and read the resolution. This is a resolution proclaiming February of 2018 to be Black History Month in Santa Barbara County. And whereas Dr. Carter Goodwin Woodson, a distinguished African American author, editor, publisher, and historian was known as the father of black history. He founded Negro History Month in 1926.

Upon the 50th anniversary of Black History Week, representation was extended to encompass Black History Month to encourage further research and publishing regarding the untold stories of African American heritage. And whereas a history of African Americans in the United States as well as throughout the ages is powerful and vibrant it is appropriate to celebrate this history during the month of February 2018 which has been proclaimed nationally as Black History Month.

And whereas, we recognize and honor the outstanding contributions of African-American veterans from Santa Barbara County who have served with distinction, bravery and valor in the armed forces of our country. And whereas on March 5th 1770, the first American to sacrifice his life in the Revolutionary War was Christmas Atticus, an African-American seaman and slave.

African Americans also fought bravely during the Battles of Lexington and Concord in April of 1777, the Battle of Rhode Island on August 29th of 1778, the Battles of Ticonderoga, White Plains, Bennington, Brandywine, Saratoga, Savannah, Yorktown and Bunker Hill. Also in the War of 1812, including the Battle of New Orleans, The Civil War, The Spanish-American War, World Wars I and II, The Korean War, The Vietnam War, Gulf War, and current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now therefore it be hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes the month of February 2018 as Black History Month and encourages residents of Santa Barbara County to celebrate the invaluable contributions, talents, and achievements And of African Americans to protect, support and enrich Santa Barbara County, our community and culture. Pass it adopted today by the board.

CommentNathan NunezProposed · by introduction10:19 · ≈ 9:10 AM

On behalf of the Office of Arts and Culture Division of the Community to Service Department, we would like to thank Pastor Ron Wiley for his service. Pastor Watkins in Santa Barbara and also recognize Chief Master Sergeant Diana Mosley from the Vandenberg Air Force Base. We would also love to invite the community to join us in the Channing Peak Gallery in Santa Barbara for the exhibition Afro-Brazilian Arts and Identities.

It will be up through mid-March and we really hope that everyone can take an opportunity to visit and celebrate that wonderful culture. Thank you so much, and thank you for your service.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8311:06 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Supervisor Williams? Did you have somebody down there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:12 · ≈ 9:11 AM

No, the Reverend Lewis Watkins is not in attendance. And I do have the resolution so we will get that to Reverend Watkins sometime this week.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8311:25 · ≈ 9:11 AM

All right perfect. So are there any other items on the administrative agenda that board members would wish to pull? Supervisor Wolfe.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed11:34 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed11:35 · ≈ 9:11 AM

I'd like to pull item A3 and A7.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8311:38 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Okay 3 and 7 supervisor Hartman A five, Supervisor Adam. And you get three and five from me. Three and five for Supervisor Adam. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:51 · ≈ 9:11 AM

They've already pulled the ones I was thinking of pulling.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8311:54 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Okay. So any items from the public?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed11:59 · ≈ 9:11 AM

We have requests to speak on item A5 from the public.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8312:02 · ≈ 9:12 AM

All right let's start with A3 then please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed12:07 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. Item A3 is from the county executive office. This is to consider recommendations regarding the cannabis tax ballot measure and this is the adoption on second reading of the ordinance adding chapter 58 to the Santa Barbara County Code imposing a tax on cannabis operations.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8312:21 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Supervisor Wolk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed12:22 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm pulling this item not because I'm changing my vote. I plan to vote for this item as I did at our last meeting. The reason I raise this though is because When I did make that vote, it was with some trepidation. But I felt comfortable enough with the ordinance that we had developed. Last night we received a memo from our planning department noting that the ordinance was going to come back to us at a later date just for a minor correction.

And so my hope is, as I'm speaking to my colleagues that when that does come back, I am anticipating that it will come back with only that correction. And then it's not open season to change the ordinance that we adopted. So I just want to make that statement and move forward with this. Thank

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8313:26 · ≈ 9:13 AM

you. Okay, and we also have Supervisor Adam also pulled a three?

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction13:31 · ≈ 9:13 AM

I just want to make sure we have a roll call vote on it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed13:43 · ≈ 9:13 AM

There is something in this that I have to ask, and I wonder if it's only because some of the material from our last hearing was included. But if in the materials for this week, the ordinance for the tax still has a cap. And that of course would mean that the language was not changed. And so my question to staff is, is this a mistake? Or is this just because the attachments for this week are out of date?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8314:23 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Mr. Guzzone, you'll go first and then Mr. Buzanich.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed14:27 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Chair and Supervisors, the materials for A3, at least the latest materials that I'm looking at removed the tax cap that was at 50A1a. That's not there anymore or in the resolution. There are two minor corrections I'd recommend for the resolution. The first is that the resolution is Based on how it went into legislature, paginated beginning with pages 2-3-4 and that should be 1-2-3.

And then also a recommendation that within the resolution, the actual ballot question that shows in paragraph 6 my recommendation would be to insert a comma between the words microbusinesses and estimated. And those are the two administrative corrections. Okay. Mr.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8315:16 · ≈ 9:15 AM

President

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed15:16 · ≈ 9:15 AM

so can you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed15:17 · ≈ 9:15 AM

read?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed15:22 · ≈ 9:15 AM

Vice Chair and Supervisor Williams. So we did provide updated resolution and ordinance language, I'm wondering if the version you're looking at because of the way the items are assembled in the electronic agenda packet. You might be reviewing the previous version but Revised versions of both the resolution and ordinance were docketed for this week. And so I'm unclear as to maybe you're not looking at the previous version of that. I don't know if Clerk of the Board can help us with how those are labeled in the agenda management system for you, Supervisor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:04 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Well, the only thing I would want to hear is for you to read the ballot language. How about that?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8316:11 · ≈ 9:16 AM

All right, who's going to be our

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:12 · ≈ 9:16 AM

reader today? Because everything I'm reading in the material online still has 30, the ordinance with the cap. And so I had a minor heart attack this morning. So just want to hear the ballot language and you don't even need to read the whole thing. Just read me the last line and I'll be happy.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8316:40 · ≈ 9:16 AM

All right, Mr. Buzanich?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed16:42 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Vice Chair and Supervisor Williams, I will do it with emphasis and gusto without the interpretive dance. So reads at the end, estimated to raise $5 to $25 million for general government services such as law enforcement, healthcare services, parks, roads, and infrastructure with no end date be adopted. Perfect.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:12 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Okay. I can return to normal pace of pulse, thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8317:16 · ≈ 9:17 AM

All right so let's, can I get a motion to move A3 with the changes? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8517:23 · ≈ 9:17 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:26 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8317:27 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Second by Supervisor Williams. Mr. Gazzone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed17:31 · ≈ 9:17 AM

So Mr. Gazzone just pointed out one variation in the language I presented, and instead of general government services it should read general government purposes. Sorry. Okay.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8317:49 · ≈ 9:17 AM

So do we-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed17:50 · ≈ 9:17 AM

I have a question. Okay,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8317:51 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed17:54 · ≈ 9:17 AM

And the second to the last sentence says health care parks, roads and others. I thought I heard you say infrastructure.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8318:03 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Why don't we read the thing from top to bottom so that we get it real clear what we're doing?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed18:08 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Thank you. I apologize So from the top, shall the measure adding Chapter 50A to the Santa Barbara County Code imposing a cannabis operations tax on cannabis operators within the unincorporated areas of the county upon their gross receipts with rates of 1% on nurseries and distributors? 3% on manufacturers, 4% on cultivators and 6% on retailers and micro businesses.

Estimated to raise 5 to $25 million annually for general government purposes such as law enforcement, healthcare, parks, roads and others with no end date be adopted.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8318:58 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Okay, so we have a motion from Supervisor Hartman. Second from Supervisor Williams. Roll call vote please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:05 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Mr. Adam? No. Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8319:08 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:09 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Ms. Wolfe? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8319:14 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Aye Passes 4 to 1. Okay let's pull A5.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:21 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Chair Labonino, members of the board. Item 85 is from planning and development. The recommendations are to consider the Caltrans Sustainable Communities Transportation Planning Grant application.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8319:33 · ≈ 9:19 AM

So I don't remember how we do this. Do we hear from the public first? Okay let's hear the public first. We

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:41 · ≈ 9:19 AM

have two requests to speak on this from the public. We're going to go to Santa Barbara for Cameron Gray and then Idalia Gomez. Cameron.

PresenterCameron GrayCommunity Environmental CouncilProposedself-stated19:55 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Good morning, Chair Williams, Vice-Chair Lavagnino and Board of Supervisors. My name is Cameron Gray and I'm speaking on behalf of Community Environmental Council. We're really pleased and excited that staff are seeking your approval to apply for this Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant. It's going to support some really important work on the circulation element update, as you know.

Would bring this document into alignment with new state requirements and laws and also help position our region for much needed planning around transportation improvements especially in light of some of the emerging technologies that we see coming forward. So we just wanted to really emphasize our support for the grant application that staff are bringing to you and seeking your approval on today.

We have spoken with a number of partners throughout Santa Barbara County, Such as Ashley Costa of the Lompoc Valley Community Health Organization, the Santa Barbara Bicycle Coalition, the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation. They're all very, very excited and ready to support the work that staff would conduct on the circulation update has proposed in the grant application.

And with that, I just want to thank you for considering the comments and reemphasize our support for the work that they are proposing. Thank you.

0:21 – 0:2618 turns

PresenterAdalia GomezSanta Barbara Rape Crisis CenterProposedself-stated21:41 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Hi, good morning. My name is Adalia Gomez and I'm here on behalf of Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center. We thank you for the support that you have provided us over the past years. SBRCC is a current recipient of Human Services Grant. Over the last year because of the support of this grant we've provided services to over 600 clients. These individuals received individual counseling via the 24-hour hotline in person, couples counseling and attended support group. Ma'am? They received support services... Excuse me. Yes?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8322:09 · ≈ 9:22 AM

I think you're speaking on the wrong item. I think you want to speak on D5, not A5. So we're going to be discussing that in just a moment. You're talking about the Human Services Commission? Yeah. Okay, just give me a few minutes and we'll be there on that item.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8522:24 · ≈ 9:22 AM

All

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8322:24 · ≈ 9:22 AM

right, Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8522:29 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair, this item I'm very supportive and excited to see that Planning and Development is applying for this grant. I would like to ask that special focus be given on trails in North County It turns out that, for example, North County has about eight miles of community trails compared to 330 miles of community trails in South County. That's a huge inequity. We know that trails and parks are very important for health and well-being. And so I think we need to start redressing that imbalance and hope that we could begin through this study.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8323:10 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Okay, also Supervisor Adam on A5.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction23:15 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Yeah, well from the North County we disagree. And just on a financial basis which is the reason I pulled this in the first place you know free money isn't free as usual there's a local match which is pretty hefty in this case at 11.47% and We're about to have a tremendously incomplete fiscal outlook report. And if we had something in front of us that was at all accurate, and I realize I'm not blaming anybody for not having an accurate fiscal outlook because it hasn't been long enough to figure out what the real damage is.

to us and ramifications of that are going to be. But I think that we should start to discipline ourselves a little bit more, and not take every apparently free dollar that comes around because it sucks out a lot of our general fund money which we're going to be needing to husband carefully in the future. So I'm opposed.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8324:26 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Okay, is there any other comments on A5? Supervisor Wolff.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed24:32 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair. As I read this project description, this is an item that's brought to us from long range planning and P&D. And I think this is a wonderful opportunity for us to get grant funding for really something that we would be doing anyway as I read this. We're going to have to update our 1980 circulation element and there's a lot of background studies, and I'm just reading from the CEQA exemption.

A lot of background studies that would include the assessment of circulation, multimodal needs, traffic counts and VMTs. Future needs assessments would include future traffic volumes, complete streets goals and potential policies in community priorities and needs. So I look at this again as a way for us to do what we need to do with the assistance of a grant.

And come out with a very good project that hasn't been updated since 1980. So I'm definitely in support of us moving forward with this.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8325:43 · ≈ 9:25 AM

Okay, Supervisor Williams any comments? Ready to vote?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed25:49 · ≈ 9:25 AM

Absolutely.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8325:49 · ≈ 9:25 AM

Okay. Supervisor Adams just ready to vote. Can we get a motion on A5?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed25:56 · ≈ 9:25 AM

So moved. Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8325:58 · ≈ 9:25 AM

Moved and seconded. Roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed26:01 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Mr. Adam? No. Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8326:03 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed26:04 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Ms. Wolfe? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams? Aye Passes 4-1

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8326:10 · ≈ 9:26 AM

All right, let's go to A7 Supervisor Wolf

0:26 – 0:2822 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed26:16 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm just bringing this up because I have to recuse myself on a couple of items. My, I've talked to county council and my husband's law practice is involved with one of these contractors so I'm going to have to recuse myself from item A7A1, A7B2, So if you take those first, I'll just walk out and then come back and vote for the rest. Sounds good. Okay, thank you. All

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8326:56 · ≈ 9:26 AM

right can we get a motion to move A7, A1 and 2 and B1 and two?

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction27:02 · ≈ 9:27 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed27:03 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8327:03 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Moved and seconded roll call please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed27:06 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Mr. Adam, aye. Mr. Lavinino, aye. Ms. Wolfe has recused herself. Ms Hartman? Aye. Mr Williams? Aye. Passes four ayes one abstention.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8327:20 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Okay I don't think we have any other administrative agenda items to pull so can I get a motion on the balance Separate? You just roll it all into

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed27:38 · ≈ 9:27 AM

one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed27:39 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Okay, we'll roll it all into one. Actually since Sue Razor Wolf was present she wanted to actually vote on that one but you could do it either way.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8327:47 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Okay well let's just do it separate then. A7. Thank you. The balance of A7

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed27:52 · ≈ 9:27 AM

I'll move the balance of A

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8327:54 · ≈ 9:27 AM

7. Moved and seconded. Roll call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed27:58 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Mr. Adam. Aye. Mr Labonino. Aye. Ms Wolk. Aye Miss Hartman. Aye Mr Williams Aye. Passes 5-0. Okay,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:08 · ≈ 9:28 AM

now let's move the balance of the entire administrative agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:11 · ≈ 9:28 AM

So moved. Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:14 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Moved and seconded. Roll call?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:15 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Labanino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:18 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:18 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Ms. Wolfe? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:24 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:24 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Passes 5- 0

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:25 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Okay, we've now got ourselves to the point where it is time for public comment. Time for the public to comment on items that are not on today's agenda and that fall under our purview. Mr. Allen how many speakers do we have?

0:28 – 0:3312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:41 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Chair Lavinino we have eight requests to speak and I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8328:48 · ≈ 9:28 AM

think that's nine now. All right so we'll all have three minutes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:55 · ≈ 9:28 AM

And we're going to start with David Hosking.

CommentDavid HoskingProposedself-stated29:10 · ≈ 9:29 AM

Good morning, Board of Supervisors. My name is David Hosking and I'm a resident of Guadalupe. I'm here today to ask you to please place the Guadalupe to Santa Maria hiking and biking trail on your regular board agenda so that we can discuss the possibility of establishing this permanent trail. Initially, I thought I would speak to you this morning about how the Santa Maria River Levee would be an ideal spot for a hiking and biking trail. I was going to tell you about the unique nature of the riparian habitat that still exists along the levee and how a variety of wildlife continues to use this area as their home.

I was also going to tell you about how families from both Guadalupe and Santa Maria would use this trail for a variety of outdoor recreational activities. And how the trail would help to draw new visitors to our area, thereby stimulating the economy of both cities. Lastly, I was going to tell you about how the trail could be used to restart the half marathon foot race that used to exist between Guadalupe and Santa Maria. But I will leave these topics for others to discuss because I believe it is more important that I use this opportunity to share with you what our community is really like.

Approximately 28 years ago, my wife and I moved from Arizona to Guadalupe so that I could accept a science teaching position at the junior high school. Many people from outside of Guadalupe warned us that this was not a good place to live. Since then we have learned that nothing could be further from the truth. From day one, we were greeted with open arms. The local residents helped us find a place to live and over the years they've shared with us their food, their culture and many of their traditions and most importantly their friendships While it is true that Guadalupe has the highest poverty rate of any city in Santa Barbara County, it also has the lowest per capita crime rate of any city in the county. Residents of Guadalupe like the residents of most cities are comprised of friendly hardworking families who want nothing but the best for their children.

During our 28 years in Guadalupe, we have found this close-knit community to be supportive, highly respectful, very friendly and exceptionally quiet. For these reasons we believe that Guadalupe continues to be the best kept secret on the Central Coast. When driving through our town on Highway 1, most people are quick to see that Guadalupe has not caught an economic break in quite some time. 25 years ago our business district was the home of more than 15 family-owned restaurants including the famous Far Western Tavern. Over the years many of these family restaurants have disappeared including the Far Western. Driving through town today drive through town today and you will find numerous vacant buildings and only a small handful of locally owned restaurants Despite these economic challenges, Guadalupe is preparing for its future.

Upon the completion of the new 200-acre Pasadena residential development and the addition of 800 new homes and 18 acres of commercial development, Guadeloupe's population is expected to grow to over 10,000 residents. When you think about Guadalupe's growing population and the 100,000 people who already live in Santa Maria, you can understand the need for providing additional family-centered outdoor recreational activities to the Santa Maria Valley.

A hiking and biking trail between Guadalupe and Santa Maria would not only be used by countless families both local and from afar, the trail would also be used by the Dune Center and the Guadaluable Cultural Arts and Education Center and our local school district.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8332:44 · ≈ 9:32 AM

Mr. Husky, we're asking you to wrap up please.

CommentDavid HoskingProposedself-stated32:46 · ≈ 9:32 AM

Okay, two more sentences.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8332:48 · ≈ 9:32 AM

No

CommentDavid HoskingProposedself-stated32:48 · ≈ 9:32 AM

problem. These non-profit organizations and the school district could use the trail to help teach our children about their local environment. I ask you to please provide the residents of Guadalupe and Santa Maria with a healthy, safe, and prosperous environment and place the hiking and biking trail on your regular board agenda. Thank you very much.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8533:09 · ≈ 9:33 AM

I wanted to first of all acknowledge that you're the third district appointee to the trails committee for the county. And also, you serve on the school board and the school has a policy related to student health and well-being?

CommentDavid HoskingProposedself-stated33:24 · ≈ 9:33 AM

Yes, we've recently revamped our health and wellness policy for our school district. And Ms. Dina Bortz is here as she's our nutritional services director for the district and she's here to share some comments with you today.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8333:40 · ≈ 9:33 AM

Perfect thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed33:41 · ≈ 9:33 AM

And Dina Bortz is our next speaker to be followed by Jeannie Sparks

0:33 – 0:4114 turns

GuestDina BortzSuperintendentProposedself-stated33:48 · ≈ 9:33 AM

Good morning. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the topic of the hiking and biking trail from Santa Maria to Guadalupe. My name is Dina Bortz, and I'm the new director of Child Nutrition Services for Guadalupe Union School District. And I'm also representing Ed Cora, our superintendent who was not able to be here today due to a prior engagement. In my capacity, I'm also the chairperson of the district's wellness policy which is mandated by the California Department of Education that we look at the overall health and well-being of our students. I believe that this trail would be an incredible opportunity not only for our students and their families to provide an opportunity for citizens of all ages to exercise in a fun and safe manner.

It would also increase business sales in the city from visitors such as walkers, jockers, bikers to stop and enjoy the restaurants that we have. And I'm sure there will be more plus our museums, shops and markets. I want to thank you for your time and your interest in this project. And now you're going to hear from a few of our students as well. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8334:54 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed34:55 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Jeannie Sparks? And then we're going to hear from Valerie Grimaldo.

PresenterJeannie SparksSanta Barbara County Action NetworkProposedself-stated35:02 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Hello, I'm Jeannie Sparks representing Santa Barbara County Action Network. And I want to encourage you to put this item on your agenda. When the original Santa Maria River Levee Trail was approved several years ago which I'm trying to find out exactly when that was, it was when Supervisor Tom Hrabanski was on the board. And at that time, there was a proposal to go out to Guadalupe with the trail. But it didn't happen and the thought was okay let's do this segment in the city of Santa Maria later we can extend it to Guadalupe. Well I say now is the time now is later and you have a lot of school children here which I know somebody's going to be representing them and I'm not sure what they're going to come up and talk or not but The critical math needed now that shows that it's really wanted, needed.

It provides a safe alternative for bicyclists, joggers, hikers to go between the cities. Highway 166 is just not the way to go if you're on a bike or you're walking. We really need a safe transportation route, alternative transportation route. It goes along with sustainable communities. It's good for business, it's good for recreation. I know that we'll have a chance to discuss these more in detail but I really like to encourage you to consider it because it's time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed36:20 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Thank you. Thank you. Valerie Grimaldo? Come on up to the podium. Pull the mic down so we can hear you and go ahead and

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8336:39 · ≈ 9:36 AM

don't be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed36:39 · ≈ 9:36 AM

nervous.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8336:40 · ≈ 9:36 AM

It's all right

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed36:43 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Hi, my name is Valerie and this is Sabrina today We are going to talk about why we should build a trail from Santa Maria to Guadalupe Beach Theme is to talk about exercise and we have six regions of exercising from Santa Maria to Guadeloupe Beach

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed37:16 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Cardiovascular exercise helps create new brain cells. This improves brain power and brain activity. Exercising on a regular basis helps boost your immune system. This means you'll get sick less often than people who don't exercise. Exercises can help Ease your mind of rejuvenate. Your body working out will make you feel great and boost your confidence

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed37:56 · ≈ 9:37 AM

A pound of muscle burns three times more calories than a pound of fat. More muscles mass burning more fat while resting. Exercising improves brain performance. Finally those are our reasons why we should build a trail from Santa Maria to Guadalupe Beach Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8338:26 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Thank you great job

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed38:33 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Next we're gonna hear from Raylina Mendez, Raylina And then we'll hear from Cruz Ramos after we hear from Raylena

CommentRaylena MendezProposedself-stated38:45 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Hello, I'm Raylena Mendez and I am very excited to be here. I'm going to be talking about pollution and ways to reduce it. Walking and biking trails is an extracurricular activity that reduces your carbon footprint. People will not be driving their cars creating smog, which is good. Running is supposed to be good for you but if you frequently run in urban environments you could be putting yourself at risk for a number of health conditions due to air pollution.

According to the American Lung Association, the ill effects of air pollution can include coughing and wheezing, shortness of breath, acute or chronic asthma comprised immune function, damage to the heart, swelling of lungs and lung cancer. It can also be a negative factor in reproductive health for adults and cause developmental harm in young children. Individuals who frequently exercise in areas or on days with elevated pollution levels are at greater risk for these health conditions than the general population.

You can find out about the air quality in your local area by checking out American Lung Association's latest state of the airport, which states more than four in ten people live where pollution levels are too often dangerous to breathe. Running or walking, even riding your bike before or after a shower lowers your exposure to pollutants because there are fewer of them in the air. It also tends to be a little cooler during these times of the day especially in the morning and high temperatures generally correspond to higher pollution levels. Air pollution has been linked to an array of health issues including worsened allergies and anxiety.

Those at risk include adults, children and people with cardiovascular or lung disease like asthma. I recommend that people use air quality information to plan their outdoor workouts so they can get exercise that's so important to our health while also reducing their exposure to air pollution. But in almost all cases concerns about pollution shouldn't be an excuse to skip exercise altogether. That's an unhealthy choice for sure.

Thank you.

0:41 – 0:5118 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed41:07 · ≈ 9:41 AM

We're going to hear from Cruz Ramos, and then we're going to hear from Gabriel Amasius and Nashay Sahagan.

PresenterCruz Ramoscity of GuadalupeProposedself-stated41:17 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Good morning and thank you for the opportunity to speak on this issue. My name is Cruz Ramos, I'm here representing the city of Guadalupe. As a city administrator for slightly over a year, I know the city is ridden with poverty. I know we're in low income community. But yet beyond all of that, I see the residents. I see the culture. I see the pride of the people, the children playing out in the streets because we lack amenities.

I also see the touring cyclists that come to our community with no place to go, no place to stay so they stay, they camp behind Our city hall. I truly, truly believe that this project goes beyond the local, the region. I think it is a worldwide attraction based on the cyclists that come through our community. They come from all over the world. Most recently one from British Columbia.

There are many, many reasons that I can explain as to why we need this project. Bottom line, the city needs more amenities that benefit health but also reduce greenhouse gas. Thank you for your time.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8343:02 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed43:04 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Our next speakers are Gabriel Macias along with Nishay Sahagan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed43:20 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Hi, my name is Gabriel and this is Rache. Today we are going to talk about a trail from Santa Maria to the Guadalupe Beach. Our first reason is a family can bond about their life at school and work.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed43:38 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Family bonding is a time when families spend meaningful time talking about what they do Mom and dad can catch up on the relationship online

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed43:50 · ≈ 9:43 AM

that a family can talk about how life is at work and school so they can tell what they learn to their parents. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed44:03 · ≈ 9:44 AM

thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8344:07 · ≈ 9:44 AM

All right good job.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed44:15 · ≈ 9:44 AM

We're going to hear from Andy Caldwell next. Then we're going to go to Santa Barbara for Dustin Rilich.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8344:21 · ≈ 9:44 AM

No pressure, Andy but this has been the best public comment period we've ever had so...

PresenterAndy CaldwellColabProposedself-stated44:27 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Thanks for pointing that out. I'm Andy Caldwell representing Colab. As a father of seven children who are now all grown, I could vouch for the fact that Our region, San Luis Obispo is different. Our region does not have enough biking, riding or hiking trails. However you don't want to just put those hiking, riding and biking trails just anywhere. As you well know Santa Maria was a flood plain and we basically channelized that river and we put a levee up.

And somebody had the idea of putting a hiking trail along the levee, and we were here back when that was being discussed. And the reason they put the enhanced trail on top of the levee in Santa Maria is because it's an urban area. It's close to an urban area, it's accessible to the urban areas, and most importantly, it wasn't along farm fields. Supervisor Hartman, I know a month or two ago you expressed some real concerns about pesticides and exposures and things like that.

Well the fact of the matter is school districts to save money usually buy farmland and put schools next to farm fields because they're trying to save money. And then it becomes the farmer's liability on how they can grow their produce and not expose anybody unnecessarily. And so they have to work around these schedules, usually spring in the middle of the night and on weekends when there's no kids in school.

Well, the problem and the reason that levee trail wasn't extended through Guadalupe is because you would impact literally thousands of acres of farmland. And I know that all of you ran on a platform saying you support agriculture. Well this is one of the ways you support agriculture and you support community health by not putting a trail through farm fields because they, the farmers actually own the riverbed.

And they can, in some places, farm in the riverbed. And then there's another issue of emergency access. There's no roads to that levee except Bonita Lateral and Highway 1. And if there's somebody that has an accident there A, how will anybody know they have an accident? B, how will emergency response people go? Get there to them. We'd rather see, for instance if the county was concerned about this, the logical place and the place that would appeal to tourists is to put either a boardwalk through the dunes and or biking trail along the road right away that goes to the beach. Ossoflaco has a road and it has a trail all the way to the beach. And so the county could do that without impacting all of the ag land between Santa Maria and Guadalupe.

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8347:32 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Thank you. Any other public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed47:36 · ≈ 9:47 AM

We're going to go to Senator Barbara for our final speaker.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8347:38 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Okay, go ahead in the meantime I think we have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed47:43 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Hello, Dustin Reilich with Renovate America's Hero Program. I want to start by doing something kind of crazy. Thank you very much to the city administrator there in Guadalupe for gathering lots of her homeowners bringing out support for a local issue for them there in Guadalupe and Santa Maria so good job Cruz and I know that she is looking to move forward hopefully with her council with our program sometime in April possibly so thank you there as well.

I'm here to represent HERO, the Home Energy Renovation Opportunity for your homeowners. I spoke two weeks ago on January 30th in favor of the item for it to be placed on the tax bill for city of Santa Barbara which is the first largest city. Lompoc has moved forward, the third largest city. I was in Goleta where they're moving forward at their green energy committee yesterday and of course like I said, I've been in contact with Ms Cruz Ramos and they are intending to take forward as well. I've spoken with county council, I've spoken with your county auditor controller and it's very clear that auditor controllers throughout the state actually kind of band together and they don't believe that PACE should be on the property tax bill. Yet because it's legislated, it's something that they do have to do if a board like yourselves decides you want to make options available to your homeowners.

When I was last here, there was a gentleman and his wife that spoke. They're a retired couple in their 70's that literally said, I'm confused why can we not just make this voluntary option available? I'm in a scenario where I'm house rich and I'm cash poor. And how is it that I can't use some of my $1.2 million equity in my home like most Santa Barbara residents? Most people want to live in their home. They want to love where they live. If I were to ask To raise your hand, how many people have been in their home for at least five years? Raise their hand. Ten years.

Fifteen years. See Santa Barbarans want to live in their home they want to stay in their home they want to love where they live and have the opportunity to upgrade it for Heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems that need to be brought up to date. Solar systems, water efficiency projects, doors and window replacements. And over 40% of homes here in Santa Barbara were built between 1940 and the 1960s. That's a lot of housing stock that we need to help our homeowners with financing options to be able to open that up. Now I know that Supervisor Adams had some concern and also Theo did in his staff report to you. What I do have to say to you is homeowners want to stay where they are. And the only concern that there is, is that if a person sells or refinances, they're simply going to have to pay off.

It's absolutely no different than paying off a HELOC, or a home equity line of credit, an equity line against your home at the time of the sale it's simply going to be paid off fully disclosed up front on a truth in lending type form, know before you owe form. I'm here to answer any questions, but 452 cities in California have moved forward and 39 of your fellow county unincorporated areas. All the big ones except some of the small ones like Trinity and Plumas and Alpine. I just don't have the time to go there, but I cover all of California. Thank you. I know I'm over my time. I would urge you to hopefully make a motion to move forward with PACE for residential homeowners here in Santa Barbara. Thank you very

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8351:10 · ≈ 9:51 AM

much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed51:11 · ≈ 9:51 AM

We do have two additional speakers for public comment. We're going to hear from Aristotle Julian and then Claire Wineman

0:51 – 1:0417 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed51:22 · ≈ 9:51 AM

Good morning, Chairman, board members, audience and especially the kids of Guadalupe Mayor Beering School. Just a little bit of disclosure. By 1964 I live in Guadalupe, I'm city council. And we have a basement there on Peralta Street which abuts almost the levee. My cousin and I were going to build, The basement, we said well let's go get some sand over at the levee and we did. We got a pickup, got the sand in the levee and then some guy knocked on the door and said you took sand from the levee put it back or you're going to go to jail but I was 16 so I was a minor.

46 years later, we did David Hoskins mentioned about the run. We did the run from half marathon from basically Peralta Street all the way to just about a quarter miles west of Gloucester and then back through Guadalupe. It was a fundraiser and it was, we did quite well with that. Guadalupe has 37% population of kids under 18 years of age. A lot of kids, probably 2,400-2,500 kids.

Mr Adams knows and all those farmers when I was a kid we could basically go out and walk in the field with our dogs and stuff and not an issue. I live in Poinsettia Dunes there's signs now you can't go walk out there because of, and I understand that. You have dogs who can't mix poop with food that is reasonable. But Guadalupe is landlocked, Guadalupe is landlocked. There was mention where we could go down and make a road down to Guadalipe Beach or Guadalie Beach from 166 County Road, try that.

You have nothing but trucks and vehicles going through there. Go to Osaflaco, try that. Try to put a passageway along that for walking. You can't do that, you're going to run over. I understand the issues when it comes to farms. We had a relationship with one of the farmers that we connected to that run, where they get permission from her. We did that for two years but ran into some issues, but that has to be looked at and I would urge this board to put this on agenda to further discuss it because I think that it's going to be benefit to Guadalupe.

You see, I work with park issues, okay? We have on O'Connell Park, people walk all the way around that thing. Talk about healthcare, we have a large Latino population that needs to walk. We have a diabetic issue, they need to walk. With the school program with the kids now learning how to take care of themselves nutritionally, pass it on to their parents, they want to walk. And when you have low income folks, there's not, Because it costs money and it's in Santa Maria. So I urge the board to place this on agenda for further discussion, because I think it's really needed in the city of Guadalupe. Thank you.

PresenterClaire WeinmanGrower Shipper Association of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties and ourProposedself-stated54:32 · ≈ 9:54 AM

Good morning, my name is Claire Weinman. I'm the president of the Grower Shipper Association of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties and our office is actually located in Guadalupe There are many wonderful things about trails and recreation And I'm very familiar with the levee trail in Santa Maria, and it's something that I enjoy regularly with my family However as Andy mentioned the site circumstances of the Guadalupe to Santa Maria Trail would be completely different We look to thoughtful land use planning to avoid predictable land use conflicts.

Active recreation is not a compatible land use with the production agriculture in Santa Maria and Guadalupe. In this case, the trail would actually pose a threat to public health and safety. Our farmers are tasked with growing safe healthy produce to feed families locally and around the world. The actual use patterns of the current levee trail include many off-leash dogs and off-trail humans on both sides of the levee, which would present substantial food safety concerns.

This is not to mention the impact of trash and illicit activities. There are currently real life concerns on the existing western edge of the levee at Blosser Road. The restrictions placed on agricultural operations continue to expand. Inducing high intensity pedestrian use would be a major impact on our agricultural producers in perpetuity, and that impact is certain to increase as production restrictions on agriculturalists expand.

For these reasons we cannot support such a trail along the levee from Guadalupe to Santa Maria. We urge the board to consider its role and thoughtful land use planning to prevent predictable land-use conflicts, and first defer to stakeholders to identify opportunities for recreations in trail locations that don't undermine local agriculture and food safety. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8356:20 · ≈ 9:56 AM

All right. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed56:21 · ≈ 9:56 AM

Public comment?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8356:23 · ≈ 9:56 AM

Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8556:24 · ≈ 9:56 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. First of all, I very much appreciate everyone who came and talked today. Mr. Cuello's fifth grade class from Mary Van Buren and all the people from Guadalupe. I can tell that you did a lot of research and that you learned to write well and to speak well. It's not easy to get up and speak in this kind of a setting, I know. So I really admire you for doing that and I especially admire you because You're learning citizenship early.

I'm elected to represent you and I need to hear from you, and all the supervisors up here need to hear from people who they represent. And so you have a voice and you can shape what your community looks like and what your county and state look like. So thank you so much for being here and taking the time in learning how your government operates. I want to talk just a minute about the issue of trails.

Many rivers have trails, many rivers through agricultural lands including Ventura, Los Angeles, Santa Ana and Santa Clara. It's very important to do this carefully and I think we can do that. We need to protect Food safety. We need to make sure that people are protected from pesticides, but people have worked that out and they have to work it out together. And so I'm hoping that that's what we'll do as we go forward.

On our ballot in June, there's going to be a California Parks and Environmental Bond. It's called Prop 68 and that would have 900 million for neighborhood parks in areas determined to have low number of parks. So for Mr. Cuello's fifth graders, this may be something to look at to get a city resolution and let people know that your parents that this is an option. Guadalupe would be an ideal city with its parks to get some of this money if indeed this bond passes. So again thank you very much for being here and I think there's a photo op perhaps?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8358:40 · ≈ 9:58 AM

Yeah we'll deal with that in just a sec. Supervisor Adam

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction58:43 · ≈ 9:58 AM

Well, I hate to rain on your parade. But this you like it? Yeah, no, actually, you know what though? Actually, I don't I really don't and you know I think these kind of things get to be really destructive because people don't understand. And you just spoke, God how do I say this? With just the extreme hopefulness about how we just all agree how to get a trail through there.

And this is going to be an openly hostile act towards commercial agriculture. We are under siege out there. I don't know if you appreciate this, but agricultural industry is under siege and we are a factory with no walls. It looks all bucolic out there and everything, but there's thousands of regulations and things we have to comply with and we accept all of the liability.

For anybody getting sick anywhere in the United States or probably anywhere in the world. I'm not aware that somebody outside the boundaries of the United States has sued a grower yet for getting sick, but it'll probably happen one of these days. But this kind of thing puts people in conflict's way, and I think it's unnecessary. It's unwise. There's always unintended consequences to these things. It just sounds so simple and so easy but it's not.

I think that it's got the potential to interfere with the purpose of the project, which we're going to have to go back and take a really careful look at with respect to Bureau of Reclamation. Mr. Fairham, can you tell me if Bureau of Reclamation is involved in that project still or do we just have total control over that since you're here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:01:07 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Adams, the levy is a Corps of Engineers.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:01:12 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Corps of Engineers, yeah. And that was put together specifically for the purpose of flood control for the communities of Santa Maria and Guadalupe and all the farm ground? Yes, that's correct. Okay so you guys do the public works, flood control does all the maintenance out there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:01:35 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Adam on the levy for flood control yes where the bikeway is in Santa Maria the city of Santa Maria does that work?

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:01:42 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Yeah and again that's no sweat because that's just got City next to it but then the other purpose of that access way is for the operations of the dam because they have to constantly go down there and check and see whether their water is tailing out. It's supposed to tail out two miles west of 101 isn't that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:02:04 · ≈ 10:02 AM

Just upstream of Bonita School.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:02:07 · ≈ 10:02 AM

Okay, all right so they access that way all the time and adjust the gates accordingly so that when there's a live stream flowing down there it ends in the right spot and settles into the basin. So thank you very much. So that operations can be impeded of the Twitchell Dam which is very important I think everybody would agree And back in the Rancho La Laguna discussion, Supervisor Hartman was telling us about all the conflicts between ag and urban users. And I'm not sure how this got to be such a good idea between then and now.

Any supervisor can put an item on the agenda at any time and it's unnecessary to stage a public outcry like this to get an item on. And so, it's not something I'm going to be interested in. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:03:13 · ≈ 10:03 AM

I just wanted to talk about how this came forward. Mr. Cuello's class got together and asked themselves what was of importance to them? What did they really want to make their community better? So, this arose from the class.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:03:33 · ≈ 10:03 AM

Supervisor Adams. Well it's interesting because I got an email that came from one of your staffers Alma Hernandez that seemed like it came the other way. Okay,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:03:45 · ≈ 10:03 AM

all we're doing today is just listening to public comment and I think public comment is closed at this point. And so I think the best thing to do at this point is take about a ten minute break before we go to the other items and I would invite The class if you'd like to take a quick photo up here with Supervisor Hartman and We'll be ready to start item five when we get back.

1:08 – 1:151 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:26 · ≈ 10:08 AM

♪ Mm. Yeah.

1:17 – 1:3210 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:17:30 · ≈ 10:17 AM

All right, we are ready to reconvene this board meeting and we will begin with item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:17:40 · ≈ 10:17 AM

Five is from the County Executive Office and it's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a Human Services Commission update.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction1:17:46 · ≈ 10:17 AM

Chair Williams, Supervisor Lavinino and board members. I'm going to kick this item off before handing over to staff. So I just want to say that we recognize the importance of all our non-profits in the county and their services to support our social safety net. We give millions annually to all our non-profits, so I don't want the public to think this is the only money we give. In fact, 57% of the agencies funded through our human services program are funded by other county contracts as well in differing amounts and services. And we don't take this issue lightly.

We appreciate the work of our Human Services Commission and their careful approach. And I want to say thank you again to Susan Foley who is our grants coordinator. And every time there seems to be a budget issue I've been asked, why does this keep coming up? And I think the prior board discussed this in the recession. And I wasn't here at the time but I think that and agreed to continue funding the Human Services Commission, the grantees. And i think that was the right decision because in the recession everyone was challenged.

Our non-profits, our philanthropy, our foundations other government agencies and so it was important to continue that work. The economy is doing better now, and we're hoping that there could be other sources and partnerships. The county unfortunately does have a projected budget deficit because our costs are growing faster than our revenues. And even though you put a ballot measure on for cannabis, we don't know with certainty how much that will generate beyond costs that we need for enforcement and compliance.

So we're bringing this item to you today. We've discussed this in the past. The human service grants program is a three year grant cycle and we said we would wait until the end of the third year, and that is now. And this has been discussed by staff with the Human Services Commission. These are difficult choices for your board and we're providing a whole gamut of options, one of which is status quo.

But this has come up through our renewal process by our employees and unlike the previous time this came up with a previous board and a previous CEO I'm not suggesting that the funds just fall back into the general fund. I'm suggesting options to keep those funds to continue to support the county social safety net. So with that I'm going to hand it over to Terry Nisich.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:20:09 · ≈ 10:20 AM

Thank you, good morning Chair, members of the board. I'm joined by Susan Foley, again our grants administrator for the Human Services Grants Program. As you recall very recently on January 23rd, the Renew 2022 initiative was presented to the Board of Supervisors for consideration and as part of that discussion, the human services grant program was referred to as a rebalancing concept for further consideration.

And in that manner it was suggested that it be reviewed for possible suspension, reduction or redirection. However as we also mentioned at that time any change to the human services grant program processes or funding is a decision that must be directed to the board of supervisors and today were before you to get direction on a way forward for this particular item.

The Human Services Commission has advised your Board of Supervisors since 1977, one of our longest standing commissions. The human services funding has been at $1.2 million annually for at least two decades. One million of that amount goes directly to the grants program and 200,000 of the 1.2 million is dedicated to staffing administration etc. In 2015, staff brought to your board and you approved a new three-tiered concept for the commission. Which again built on the history of robust monitoring and contract compliance. At that point we built into the process a best practices component in which best practices in terms of grant programs were utilized to provide funding to the community.

The three-tiered concept just as a quick reminder, the best practices grant which was basic services grants with best practices component along with that was a $450,000 component of the total grant program. Basic service grants generally composed of 500,000 of the total grant program And at that time you also authorized a program called mini-grants, which is about 60,000 of the total. Which was primarily for capacity building for some of our smaller agencies, ideally getting them to the place where they could ultimately participate in the larger best practice grants.

As part of the grant program, staff does maintain a robust monitoring process for all of the grants in the best practice and basic services categories. That includes quarterly reviews of reports filed by each of the agencies as well as multiple site visits. The Human Services funding historically has covered a variety of priority needs, which we typically meet with your board to affirm the needs as designated by the Human Services Commission as part of their review process. Typically those needs have been identified as senior citizen needs, freedom from abuse and children's programs. So traditionally in the past, there's been a variety of different programs funded from everything from children and family needs, homelessness, programs for disabled individuals.

Persons with HIV AIDS and again victims of abuse. Services generally include provision of food, clothing, shelter, after school programs, counseling, case management, job education and job placement programs. We also are very cautious to review those grants with an eye on ensuring that funding is distributed countywide, not just to one sector of the county or for one particular need. We truly work to focus on the priority needs identified by the commission and affirmed by your board.

Since 2011, the Human Services Commission has also assisted in providing guidance to the board on the development and distribution of community development block grant money and the emergency solutions grant. And we work in concert with the HCD department on the distribution of those funds. There are a number of options available to your board when considering the Human Services Grant Program. This is again, as CEO Miyasato mentioned, a discretionary general fund program that we have discussed in the past and as we indicated on the 23rd, we would come back before you with a series of options for consideration today.

Again, there are a number of options. The first of which is truly status quo and what status quo is to again publish a three-year NOFA. We are again at the end of the last three year cycle so to again publish a three year notice of funding availability in February this month for the full funding up 1.2 million. Option two would be to potentially eliminate the mini-grants component. That is that $60,000 amount that I referred to earlier and publish a three year NOFA without that funding so that would provide a $60k change to the actual grant program Option three would be to reduce or eliminate the budget by the 5% and publish a one-year NOFA.

This is not preferred by the Human Services Commission for several reasons. One, there is a significant amount of staff effort that goes into publishing a one year NOFA as well as contract monitoring and compliance so that is not a preferred option by the commission. I should state that option one is the preferred option to keep status quo. I neglected to mention that.

Option four would be to extend some or all of the existing grantees for one year in whole or in part and revisit the NOFA next fiscal year. In the past, we have done what we called a rollover of funds where we basically turned the three-year grant funding cycle into a four year and then re-explored everything at the end of that four year period. So that is another option that may be available to your board Option five is to no longer do ANOFA and to redirect 100% of the grant to county provided safety net services.

And we've listed a couple of those options, there are certainly more but we wanted to make you aware of what that 1.2 million could potentially address and these are not in total. I've listed what the cost would be for example 1.2 million would allow you to retain five child welfare workers annually, or eight FTEs eligibility workers case managers. Another option it would address five social workers and then finally as previously discussed with the board a $1.2 million investment could address 8.3 forensic mental health recovery beds.

Option six, and these percentages can be moved. Truly what the board can look at both time and percentage in terms of the redirection or consideration of these monies. Option six would involve a redirection of a portion 50% of the grant and then continue with 50% of the grant. And then publish a NOFA or extend the best practices or basic services in whole or in part. So as you can see there's a series of options within each of these options and then option 7, as I noted could truly be any combination of the options above.

One of the things I would indicate that should the board wish to direct us to pursue an option that does include ANOFA and requesting feedback again, working with our commission in order to process that we would need to know that today. A NOFA typically for this service is issued in November. We have delayed that issuing of the NOFA so that we could have this discussion with the board, but if that was part of your direction today to pursue that, we would certainly need to know that today in order to gear up, get out to the community and issue the NOFA.

The recommended actions before you today are to receive our report and consider some of the options that we've provided to you today, and to provide direction on a preferred option or perhaps something that we have not considered here today. And then, of course, to make findings that the actions that are listed here today are not a project under CEQA. So we are happy to answer any questions. I do know that there are multiple members of the commission here today, I believe there's six members of the commission and a number of folks that would like to speak on this item. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:29:15 · ≈ 10:29 AM

Great. Do we have any questions of staff from the board? Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:29:20 · ≈ 10:29 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. You mentioned the commission in monitoring these contracts that they do very robust monitoring and site visits. And one of the things that I've always been impressed by the commissioners is Is the work that they do, not just in analyzing the grants but also the follow up monitoring. And that's something that we've always I think as a board have always been concerned about is because as Ms. Miyasato stated, we do spend millions of dollars in some of our outside agencies and so monitoring is really important to us.

So that's why, and I'll go into my comments later. But that's why I think this commission is so important and the work that they do is so vital to our community. But what I would like you to explain Ms. Nesich is when you say robust monitoring just explain that a little bit more.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:30:29 · ≈ 10:30 AM

Certainly, as Supervisor Wolf through the chair. For the best practice grants as well as the basic service grants it begins with the actual application itself and Susan works directly with the commission in looking at each of the applications and through those application developing a series of outcome measures and areas that they're going to carefully track as part of the ongoing grant funding.

Once that is done, they then conduct monitoring of what they're actually achieving in terms of the outcome measures and tasks that they've set forth as part of their contract. They measure those and then make sure that they're on track. Typically what is done if people are wavering and not on track there is a number of different times that we will meet with them to make sure that we get them on track and Spending and achieving their goals in the way that they've outlined. Those are typically also discussed with the commission We have a monitoring committee That also works or a compliance committee I should say that works closely with staff on identifying any issues within that may be occurring with any of the agencies And then once reporting is received, then it is only then that we allocate the quarterly funding.

Nothing is ever allocated carte blanche. It's done over a series of time making sure that all the measures that they've indicated are met and then we also do this I shouldn't say we Susan and the Commission also does the site visits to make sure that actually what is reported is actually being seen on the ground and those programs are effective so it involves a number of things but that's really in a nutshell

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:32:08 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Okay, thank you. Thank you for that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:32:11 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Any other questions or we go to public comment? Okay, let's go to public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:17 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Chair Lavinino, members of the board, we have about ten speakers. We're going to go back to Santa Barbara for Idalia Gomez and then back here for Ann McCarty.

1:32 – 1:3811 turns

PresenterAdalia GomezSanta Barbara Rape Crisis CenterProposedself-stated1:32:32 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Thank you for having me again. Again, my name is Cedalia Gomez and I'm here on behalf of Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center. We thank you for the support that you have provided us over the past years. SBRCC is a current recipient of a human services grant. Over the last year because of the support of this grant we provided services to over 600 clients. These individuals received individual counseling via the 24-hour hotline in person couples counseling and attended support group. They receive support services including follow-up, medical and legal advocacy, accompaniment, information and community referrals. Through the Community Education Program over 4,000 community members participated in community education programs designed to increase awareness and understanding of sexual violence.

And assist participants with developing behaviors that increase the attitudes, which support the prevention of sexual assault. Additionally, Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center offered in-services for law enforcement, medical and mental health professionals. Today you've heard a number of options of human services funding. We ask you to consider extending the current grant for one year and to revisit the NOFA next year. This would greatly benefit our agency as it would allow for continuation of services this upcoming year, and it would give us time to prepare for any changes that the county decides to make on these grants.

We ask you to now redirect Human Services grant funds towards other county provided human services programs. Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center is the only agency providing sexual assault services to adolescent and adult survivors of sexual assault and their significant others in South Santa Barbara County. Redirecting funds will decrease our ability to continue with level of programming and will leave us unable to meet the needs of our community. An important part of healing process for survivors of sexual assault is to feel that they are believed and supported by their community. Your support to continue funding programs such as those offered by Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center will demonstrate the support that the county has for survivors of sexual assault Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center empowers people through healing and social change to eliminate all forms of sexual violence.

We are committed to transforming lives by providing services and education to meet the needs of our diverse community. Please continue to extend your support and assist us in our mission, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:34:45 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Thank you. Back here to Santa Maria for Anne McCarty. And then we're going to hear from Judy Monte following Anne.

PresenterAnne McCartyfor the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection CenterProposedself-stated1:34:55 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Good morning Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I'm Anne McCarty, Executive Director for the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection Center. Thank you for the opportunity to address you today. 585, that's how many people in immediate crisis the North County Rape Crisis Center served from July 2016 through June 2017. Since July 2017 we have provided services to 402 individuals in need.

This says nothing about the thousands of women, men and children we provided educational opportunities to in 2017. And the 8,520 we've already provided programming to this year. Our call volume has risen by approximately 25% since July 2016, and I suspect that by the end of June 2018 it may be even higher. Simply put, the services we provide in North County will suffer if we are unable to secure human services funding.

But I'm not here just to talk about the amazing vital work the center does. There are over 20 agencies that receive human service funding, and each of us play an integral part in the health of our county. From providing critical counseling to children who've been abused through calm, advocacy for children in the court system by CASA, meals for seniors through Meals on Wheels, respite for caregivers through Valley Haven, Emergency shelter through GoodSAM, support services in the San Ynez Valley through People Helping People to Isla Vista Youth Projects strengthening the community.

All of our services provide a critical safety net for many of our vulnerable populations. Of the over 22 programs receiving funding, my agency personally works with about 11 of those programs for services that we don't or can't provide. We work to coordinate services, attend collaborative meetings and work together to ensure that there are no duplication of services.

I can't think of one single county agency that does all that we do together. In choosing to continue human service funding, you ensure that you're adhering to the mission of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors by providing quality public services to the people of Santa Barbara County in response to their need for a healthy, safe and prosperous environment.

I won't pretend to understand the complexities of the work ahead of you with the budget. But I can say that I know you need each of us to continue to provide the emergency services, the critical programming, the food, the shelter, the education at the level in which we have been. Taking away this crucial funding will cripple many of our programs, will weaken an already struggling county and will leave a gaping hole in the safety net provided by so many. Please choose either option one or at the very least option four. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:37:58 · ≈ 10:37 AM

Question from Supervisor Adam,

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:00 · ≈ 10:38 AM

sorry. So you said there was a number of different entities that you work with that you couldn't give any funding to?

PresenterAnne McCartyfor the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection CenterProposedself-stated1:38:08 · ≈ 10:38 AM

That I couldn't give any funding to?

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:10 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Yeah, your organization.

PresenterAnne McCartyfor the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection CenterProposedself-stated1:38:11 · ≈ 10:38 AM

I don't

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:12 · ≈ 10:38 AM

understand your question. Well, I understood you to say that there was multiple different organizations that you work with that you give money to. No?

PresenterAnne McCartyfor the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection CenterProposedself-stated1:38:24 · ≈ 10:38 AM

No, that's not what I said. I said that we collaborate of the over 20 agencies that human service funding is given to, we collaborate and work with.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:34 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Okay maybe maybe you're spending money on

1:38 – 1:4415 turns

PresenterAnne McCartyfor the North County Rape Crisis and Child Protection CenterProposedself-stated1:38:40 · ≈ 10:38 AM

We're not spending money,

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:40 · ≈ 10:38 AM

we're collaborating with them. I must have misunderstood. Sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:46 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Okay.

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction1:38:47 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:47 · ≈ 10:38 AM

you. Judy Monty and then we'll hear from Michelle Mickiewicz

PresenterJudy MonteCentral Administrative Services for the Community Action Commission and a memberProposedself-stated1:38:58 · ≈ 10:38 AM

My name is Judy Monte. I'm Director of Central Administrative Services for the Community Action Commission and a member of Peter Adams District, living in the Orchard area and working in Goleta. Several months back we received a call from a woman I'll call Mary who wanted to thank us for help she had received through 211 more than a year earlier. When she placed her original call, Mary was on the verge of homelessness. 211 connected her to resources for rent and car payment assistance as well as employment services that helped her to ultimately become self-sufficient.

She said 211 helped save her life and gave her direction. When Mary called several months back to thank us, she also asked for referrals to senior services saying her life was in a good enough space now that she could bring her elderly mother to live with her. But mom needed some services and she wanted to know what Senior Services 211 could recommend for her.

Imagine with me what the cost might have been to the county if these two women hadn't been able to receive assistance through 211 in directing them to appropriate health and human service agencies. Similarly, Community Action Commission Senior Meals Program provides an essential safety net for seniors And I might add that the California Department on Aging indicates the senior population is going to be growing twice as fast as the general population.

While we asked for a $3 donation, no seniors ever turned away from the lack of ability to pay and to the best of our knowledge Community Action Commission is the only meal program that will not deny service based upon ability to pay. It makes us a vital resource, a vital safety net for these people. I would propose that the county's safety net cannot provide the same level of service that all the agencies that receive human service funding receive. Tens of thousands of people in a wide variety of service The county will pay for the services.

You've got an option of whether you're going to pay for Mary and her mom through your services at a much higher rate, we know part of the budget issue is the unfunded benefits to employees. We know that nonprofits do it much cheaper. You can pay for at risk youth to be served by the Boys and Girls Club, and receive life skills that will serve them for their lifetime. Or you can pay for that young adult that's gone amiss to be housed in our overcrowded jail. It's up to you how you will spend that money.

It was suggested that this is a good economic time for nonprofits and I would challenge that. With the

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:42:04 · ≈ 10:42 AM

recent

PresenterJudy MonteCentral Administrative Services for the Community Action Commission and a memberProposedself-stated1:42:06 · ≈ 10:42 AM

national disasters, we've had our funding sources redirect their funding Disaster relief, we've had a major basic services grant pulled by one of our largest foundations in the county.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:42:21 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Don't make me cut you

PresenterJudy MonteCentral Administrative Services for the Community Action Commission and a memberProposedself-stated1:42:22 · ≈ 10:42 AM

off.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:42:22 · ≈ 10:42 AM

I wouldn't.

PresenterJudy MonteCentral Administrative Services for the Community Action Commission and a memberProposedself-stated1:42:24 · ≈ 10:42 AM

I'm just saying that right now we need your support more than ever and we're asking you for at least this year to hold the line on funding to human services. Thank You Mr. Chairman.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:42:35 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Michelle Mickiewicz and then Lou Anne Miller

CommentIdalia GomezProposed · by introduction1:42:44 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Chair Williams, members of the board, Michelle Mickiewicz. I'm the chair of the Human Services Commission and I'm here with Commissioner Glasgow who's here in this room and then in Santa Barbara we have our Vice-Chair Susie Coffin, Commissioner Cater, Commissioner Tosh and Commissioner Fairfield so The commission appreciates very much that the board way back in June of 2012, budget hearings made $1.2 million in human services funding an ongoing allocation in the county budget and this funding has you know has been in place since 1977 so we encourage the board to maintain this direction and support full funding for Human Services Local nonprofit agencies depend on human services funding to serve residents and communities throughout the county.

They provide a range of cost effective services, emergency shelters, senior meals, domestic violence interventions, services to the homeless and the disabled just to name a few. And of course these safety net services are important at all times but especially now when we see the impact the recent disasters have had on so many families. There are a number of options before your board. The Commission supports those options that would provide full funding, so option one or option four at the full funding level.

Option two does remove $60,000 in funding for mini-grants that support staff development, training outreach and infrastructure for nonprofits. If a reduction were to be necessary we would support maximizing direct service funding and reducing the mini grant amount. Human Services Commission doesn't support the other options that reduce and redirect human services funding as they would negatively impact the system of safety net services currently in place across the county.

If the board selects option one, the commission is prepared to release a notice of funding availability and we'll move the application selection process forward expeditiously in order to allow applications to be submitted and contracts for services to be in place by the start of the fiscal year. We urge your board to continue their support of human services in the county by maintaining the current level of funding. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:44:54 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Thank you. Lynn Miller to be followed by Dean Paley's

1:45 – 1:502 turns

PresenterLou Anne MillerIsla Vista Youth Projects and now a fierce advocateProposedself-stated1:45:01 · ≈ 10:45 AM

Good morning, Chair, Vice-Chair and members of the Board of Supervisors. I'm Lou Anne Miller. I am the newly retired director of Isla Vista Youth Projects and now a fierce advocate. Some 25 years ago, I stood before this board differently comprised, of course. And I had a group of children with me and we held up a fisherman's net at that time. And into that net, we placed a house, a doll, food and other items that were representative of the services and programming that human services funded agencies are providing to support residents in our county.

One by one, the children helped me cut the net. And as those items fell through, we placed them in a big bin that said Santa Barbara County. I don't have the children with me today, but I wanted to recreate that image for you. You heard from the previous speakers about the cost effectiveness of human service providers. We are able to leverage other funds to provide services. We use volunteers to augment our service delivery mode. We are considerably more cost effective than county services.

My goal would be for a family to never enter into needing county services. For instance, in our work strengthening children and families, I don't want the call to Child Welfare Services that a parent is really struggling with their child. I would rather we'd be working with that family up front, strengthening the parent, working with the child so that the child and the family are having positive outcomes growing up.

I'm going to urge you to continue full funding of human services. I'm nervous about a full NOFA for three years issued out in the middle of February. I know the impact that would have on human services who are currently providing services and then writing a new grant. For that reason, I would encourage option number four which is continuation of funding for one year and during that year Be working to do the strategies and the full funding release for the following three years. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:47:26 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Good morning, Chair Lavinino and supervisors. Thank you for providing the nonprofits with this opportunity to address this issue. I'm going to diverge a little bit from the comments that I wrote down because I think it's really important. First of all, many of you know me and I'm fairly blunt. And with all due respect, I think I need to answer the CEO's commentary about the recession being over and everything maybe is back to normal.

And in fact, I guess maybe I should agree. Things are back to almost normal if I've been with people helping people in the Santa Ynez Valley as a CEO for 23 years. I was on the board prior so almost the entire history of people helping people 25 years. And if we go back eight years to the pre-recession numbers, our most basic needs program that's providing food to those in need actually is higher today than it was prior to the recession. And I think you probably do know That since you commissioned the poverty study, that poverty has grown especially amongst single moms and seniors. We have a rapidly growing cadre of seniors in this county. So the need hasn't gone away, the need is actually increased. And I think as some commented earlier there's no new pots of gold that we've been able to find and we search really really hard along with the other non-profits.

And now we face a change in tax laws that is going to affect our donations. And on top of that, locally, we've seen money diverted to emergency services and rightfully so. We understand that but that's going to affect our operations. In our particular case the money that's provided by human services goes directly to provide food to those who live 150% of the poverty level. When you think about that well they're above poverty level but these are the working poor that are all over North County. Who work on farms and vineyards, who work in the hospitality industry. And more and more relying on transit occupancy tax.

And sales tax to fund local government. Those are the backbone of those industries, and those are the people who live on a razor's edge who can't make due. You've all recently heard about someone who couldn't afford to buy Tamiflu and who died. We see that from many, many people every month making decisions at the end of the month whether they're going to pay rent, whether they're going to buy prescriptions. So I would urge you to continue Really, I think it's more than 40 year commitment that this board has made to fund human services ever since the block grants were started under revenue sharing. To continue that and I would agree with Luanne that now it's February, the NOFA is in March really a burden to smaller agencies to have the staff be able to commit to write a three-year grant.

It would be great if you continue funding, to have the one year funding then put together some initiatives or priorities for the next three years. Thank you.

1:50 – 1:5712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:30 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Hector Geron. To be followed by Kristen Cahoon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:50:38 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Good morning. Board of Supervisors, Chair, I'm Nino. I'm here to represent Good Samaritan Shelter. I've been working for the Good Samaritan Shelter for almost six years now. As the chief accountant, I know that at Good Samaritan Shelter stretches the dollars received as We we maximize each dollar that we get just as an example. It costs about gets married shelter about three $3 per night to keep one individual shelter at our emergency shelter, just to give you an idea what it would cost.

You know in general if the county had to do this, it would cost much more so I'm here You know, to hopefully convince the board to continue providing support for the human service agencies. We do a lot for the community and if this funding was redirected it would deeply affect you know a lot of the vulnerable homeless population. Largest homeless provider in northern Santa Barbara County, and so it would affect us deeply if the funds were not Allocated for the human services.

Thank you so much

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:52:08 · ≈ 10:52 AM

Kristin can be followed by Carmen Mendoza

PresenterKirsten CahoonHomeless Services for Good Samaritan ShelterProposedself-stated1:52:15 · ≈ 10:52 AM

Good morning Board of Supervisors. I'm Kirsten Cahoon, the Director of Homeless Services for Good Samaritan Shelter. I am here today on behalf of the 450 clients that called us home last night. We want to thank you for your continued support of Good Samaritan. We understand you have very tough decisions ahead and we don't envy your position. We just want you to remember that these programs that are being discussed today are essential in the lives of the people in our community. Without these safety net funding, we are not able to get our clients back on their feet and back into self-sufficiency. As you know Good Samaritan Shelter is the only emergency shelter provider in the North County.

And we hope as you make these changes, that you remember how important all the nonprofits are that are being funded by the Human Services Commission and how essential this work is to make our community a wonderful place to live. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:12 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Carmen Mendoza. And then Jeremy Denny after that.

PresenterCarmen MendozaAcademic SuccessProposedself-stated1:53:21 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Good morning, my name's Carmen Mendoza and I work for the Boys and Girls Club as their Director of Academic Success. And I'm here to just share a little bit of how your funding has made our program successful. Of course we have the stats where right now with the current members we are serving 77% of them are on track of great progression for this school year.

And we also have our stats with our NYOI, which is a national survey that our members take. And they are also 78%, excuse me 98% of them are on track for on time high school graduation with 77% of those kids We also have testimonial from our own kids when we ask their kids what the club means to them. A lot of them say it's a second home and a safety place where they can go, and we've also asked what they like most about our club. And across from six-year-olds to our teenagers, they like it because there's homework help. It's fun, and we integrate fun with learning, and they also like the staff.

And recently our teenagers, especially those that are in high school, are asking for extra homework help. Because they know that one of our unit directors is an English major and that's something where they struggle from. So they're coming in even later and getting help from our staff. I just thank you for your time.

CommentDavid HoskingProposedself-stated1:54:47 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:54:50 · ≈ 10:54 AM

you. Jeremy Denning to be followed by Andy Caldwell

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:54:57 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Chair Labonino and Supervisors, thank you for your past support of our organization and the community as a whole. I'm not going to take up a lot of your time and I know that these are important issues to each and every one of you. I am asking that the board votes in favor of option four which is extending The existing grantees for another year with the commission's direction and guidance, and delaying the NOFA process to the next fiscal year. This will extend funding for existing grantees again per the commission's guidance and revisit the NOFA next fiscal year. This benefits Human Services' existing grantees and gives the county greater flexibility to assess the situation next year.

As a direct provider of safety net services and a current human services grantee, and the statistics that you just heard from Carmen regarding how that funding has benefited our Guadalupe youth. We are hopeful that the board will support full continued funding for existing human services grantees, and we look forward to working with the commission to create a new NOFA In 2019 and beyond, ensuring continued services are available to the children and teens most in need throughout Guadalupe and Santa Maria is of the utmost importance to Boys & Girls Clubs of Santa Maria Valley.

And again I thank you for your past support and your continued support of the organizations that are represented here today. Jeremy I have a question. How many kids do we have

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:56:37 · ≈ 10:56 AM

in the Boys and Girls Club in the Santa Maria Valley?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:56:40 · ≈ 10:56 AM

There are 1,981 registered club members 527 of those have participated in project learn through the county's funding and support and All of those were out of the three club sites that we operate in Guadalupe great. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:56:57 · ≈ 10:56 AM

Mr. Caldwell then we'll hear for from Laurie Lander Goodman who's our final speaker

1:57 – 2:036 turns

PresenterAndy CaldwellColabProposedself-stated1:57:05 · ≈ 10:57 AM

Chair Lavenino, members of the board. I'm Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. Your county CEO is leading a project of renewal and revisioning how you deliver services because your current model isn't working or about to go bankrupt if you don't do something different. And one of the most important things that Mike Brown ever taught me when he was the CEO was he says if you can't measure it, you can't manage it.

And so what you really should be talking about here today is, do we do a better job delivering services to the poor and needy via public services or private services? Where do you get the most bang for the buck? I would offer to you that this is probably, besides a few other departments. This is the key area where you can and should privatize. And one of the reasons has to do with the cost of staff. Most people in the nonprofit sector don't make much money.

Secondly, you don't have any liability with regard to pensions. That right there means you could put more money into services. And it's not that these people are slaves to what they're doing, they are literally public servants working in non-profit organizations and you should honor that by utilizing them to the maximum amount possible. Secondly, they multiply the money they get by leveraging that money through grant applications. And secondly, they do it through volunteers. Our Rotary Club for instance, I've been in a rotary club for 30 years. We give out like $70,000 a year to Boys and Girls Club, the YMCA, CASA and all these other organizations because we're one of those multiplication factors plus members of our club volunteer.

They volunteer in Guadalupe every year. They volunteer for CASA, and what you're creating there is a synergistic effect. I can guarantee you we're not going to write a check to the county of Santa Barbara. You're not a charity. They are a charity. We just heard this item about trails for Guadalupe. Which would cost somebody a fortune, create all sorts of impacts, negative impacts on farmers and ranchers.

And then the very next item we're thinking about withholding the funds from the Guadalupe Boys and Girls Club. This is the kind of chaos that drives us crazy. And this is why we support your CEO's plan to revision, but that revisioning has to include privatization and this area right here should probably be tops on your list because again you pay for a bureaucrat to push paper or pay for somebody in the private sector to actually provide service. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:00:19 · ≈ 11:00 AM

Any more public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:00:20 · ≈ 11:00 AM

Lori Lander Goodman, our final speaker.

PresenterLori Lander-GoodmanIsla Vista Youth ProjectsProposedself-stated2:00:27 · ≈ 11:00 AM

Members of the board, I'm Lori Lander-Goodman. I am the new executive director of Isla Vista Youth Projects. Three weeks ago, I was the chief development officer at CALM. So I actually have a much better opportunity to speak about the benefit of the Human Services Commission funds that CALM has provided and leveraged across the county. That money has been so well spent.

It has allowed flexibility, it's allowed us to reach the youngest citizens of this county. It saves so much money to invest in young children. Isla Vista Youth Projects as well as CALM are investing in the youngest children and saving from when they come to the county. Com $5,000 to prevent abuse by strengthening families by working with partners. It costs $210,000 over the course of someone's lifetime in health care costs, Physical health to not do that. Those are all the things the county will have to pay for by removing human services funding I urge you to choose option four To give really good thought to a NOFA next year To invest more robustly next year.

But to give us the chance to roll it over and to think about this carefully. This is my first time speaking with the Board of Supervisors, so thank you. I expect to improve next

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:02:15 · ≈ 11:02 AM

time. You did great. Thank you. All right, I'll bring it back to the board. Staff, anything you'd like? Okay, great. Supervisor Wolf.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:02:26 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair, I do have a question. At first I was leaning toward the status quo option one but we heard from some speakers who talked about option four. I would be okay with that. The only question I had is the way that this is written in the slide presentation where it says extend some or all of the existing grantees for a year, in whole or in part and revisit NOFA next fiscal year. So when I saw the word revisit, it made me think that we are going to have this conversation all over again.

What I'm hearing though from some of the speakers is that the revisiting is not that we would have this discussion again, it would just be an automatic starting of the three year NOFA process in a year. So I just want to confirm that that's correct as far as option four goes.

2:03 – 2:117 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:03:32 · ≈ 11:03 AM

So the assumption with option four, although there's a number of different ways to move on it was to basically roll over the funding to the designated agencies for that one year. Business as usual for one year and then reconsider the NOFA process for next year and I think you know that could entail a number of different things re-suggesting priorities Again looking at the funding totals. It could involve a number of different things pending your direction, but the intent here was to roll it over and then continue the conversation revisit it next year

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:04:10 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Okay, well yeah thanks for clarifying that. I think in a motion it could be clarified. Do you have anything to add Ms. Foley as far as the commission goes? Whether or not the commission again, I heard option one and option four is there time for folks to resubmit ANOFA by March or are we too late?

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:04:41 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Supervisor through the chair, we are a little behind but no, we will make it work. Whatever the recommendation of the board is, we will make it work. We have a number of ways to streamline and there will be some time constraints put on the applicants. But we will make it work. There's a chance that some of the contracts would not be done, the ones that have to come back through the board until later in the summer but before the first quarter of invoicing and so on it would be done. So there isn't anything here that we can't do.

But my understanding from the nonprofits who have contacted me and who I've heard from today is more That they wish to extend it because we are kind of behind. And they did go through a pretty rigorous review and selection process, and it would be just a fourth year on to the three years. But that they're expecting another NOFA I don't think they're saying to come back in. That's my understanding. They don't want that option if it means coming back and fighting for the future. That's what I've been heard.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:05:49 · ≈ 11:05 AM

Okay, that's what I would imagine. So I don't have any questions, but if you're ready for comments, I'll make my

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:05:58 · ≈ 11:05 AM

comment. Yeah, this is the comment

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:06:01 · ≈ 11:06 AM

time. This is comment time. First of all thank you everyone who came out today our non-profit partners and when I say partners I really do mean that because we as a county couldn't do what we do without the partnerships that we have in the nonprofit community We certainly do have our contracts, but the extra amount of money that is allocated by the Human Services Commission I know has made a big difference. And I appreciated seeing this list that we got from our staff.

It's reflective of the great work that you all do to make our community whole. And I just can't go on without talking about our own county workers, our social workers, our eligibility workers. Our county employees are very vital again to the entire system but there is a synergy between government and non-profit agencies to make things work. Because the county can't do, we cannot do it all and so we do depend on you.

And in my mind for me having watched so many conversations about the Human Services Commission over the years I have always valued the work that they do. But it's even more important now. And when this did come to us whenever we heard this item, and I've talked to Ms. Miyasato about this before and also to Ms. Nisich. The delay of the NOFA process, the cutting of money to the Human Services Commission. I was just like you've got to be kidding. One of the most important commissions that we have and that we value why would we cut funding to this commission? In fact this is a commission that has come to us numerous times asking for additional funding and we have not provided that additional funding.

So it almost is like adding insult to injury. The other thing is that I think it was last year, maybe two years ago we stopped as a board. We, I don't know if we made a formal decision or an informal decision to not take outside non-profit budget requests at the end of our budget and As I recall, one of the reasons we did that was because we were getting non-profits coming in literally at the last minute on a Friday when we were doing our budget.

And I know for me one of the reasons I felt it was important to stop that practice was because we have the Human Services Commission in place and they are the ones that are evaluating the applications. They're the ones who are doing the monitoring. And so I felt that that was a more reasonable and rational way for us to expend our funds. And I continue to feel that way, the services you provide are exemplary. The other thing that you do in order for us to kind of look at this globally is we have entrusted our commissioners to work with our county staff in looking at, is it our CDBG?

So these are all volunteers. Our commissioners are all volunteers who we are entrusting with not just this portion of money, the million dollars but we're also asking them to look at another pot of money or CDBG funds and one of the reasons we do that is because we know that this group of amazing people They're looking at the broad context of the services that are being provided in the county so that there's no overlap. And I think as you go through this list, it's just remarkable There's very little overlap.

And I love when we see the map, when you come back to us with a map and we see how you're hitting all different parts of the county. This is a true county-wide initiative. So for me again as I started off, You know, I wanted to support option one. However, I will support option four and if given the opportunity to make a motion, I would make a motion for option four with the condition that there is going to be a new NOFA published In time so that they have a three year window. I think it would be November of 2018, is that right Susan? So that the commission and all of our non-profits would know that they would get this an additional year but the NOFA process would start in November of 2018, the three year NOFA process.

Maybe that's the best thing. But anyway, when time comes if no one else wants to make a motion- I'll bring it back to you to make sure.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction2:11:34 · ≈ 11:11 AM

Supervisor Adam? CEO Miyasato, when do you believe that we're going to understand the full impact of the Montecito happenings?

2:11 – 2:2411 turns

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:11:53 · ≈ 11:11 AM

Supervisor Adam through the chair, we've heretofore given you estimates through the first 45 days of the disaster. So probably by budget workshops would have a better idea so in April

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction2:12:03 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Okay, so you think it's gonna take another month and a half two months to be able to really tell what the impacts are?

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:12:13 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Supervisor Adams through the chair. So here to four we said our share based on the first 45 days is going to be about $7 million to $9 million for all funds We've hit the 30-day mark and so we'll be projecting out further We can give updates to the board, but we'll have better numbers as we get closer to April

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction2:12:31 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Okay. Well, I think it's premature to be making this decision before we're presented with the full impacts of the Montecito events. Allocating these dollars before that information is available, I think is just irresponsible so I won't be supporting anything today. Supervisor

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:12:59 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:13:02 · ≈ 11:13 AM

Sure, I first want to say it is. Such an amazing amount of work that our nonprofit community does. Both the folks that have received these grants and others, we are very blessed. We are cursed that we have a high poverty rate in this community and low wage levels but we are blessed that we do have nonprofits that attempt to Rush into that reach. I'm a little disappointed at a lot of the tone today, the need to be pejorative at the same time of being boosterish on the nonprofit community but pejorative on the services provided by the county to the same, my view largely the same population that nonprofits If we don't balance things right, we will preserve services in one place and hurt them in another that affects the same population.

And as alluded to in the staff report at stake are things that are pretty concrete too like Child welfare services, I would throw in the need that's still been out there for foster care outreach. We still have too few foster parents stepping up and part of that is because we only have one person whose job that is. You can't tell me that doesn't affect the demand for the same services. It's the same population, it's the poor that get hurt either way and I just feel like we're a little too much in our silos.

That being said, to me the reason why we have to proceed is that we do need to either do a NOFA process or an extension. I think the large grants both categories are really important and should be preserved I could be convinced of option four, especially because of the efficiency and delivery of these folks not having to do another grant application. Hopefully that would mean more services to the population we all want to help.

You know, I just wish that this idea of weighing whether we're doing more with the mini-grants or whether we do more with actually having enough you know another child welfare worker so that You know, kids aren't are the same kids aren't being exposed to danger or a foster care worker so that some of the same kids actually might find a permanent placement. We've got a way too much silo thinking and some, you know.

I'll probably be satisfied with option four but it means that we still have Real needs that are not going to be addressed in this year's budget for the same people that the nonprofit community serves. I'll add also that when people are being pejorative of county services, they're actually being pejorative of themselves because a huge portion of those services are not done with a county worker. They're done with contracts with the same nonprofits. Calm was mentioned. My hope is that we, I guess at the end of the day We could say that Hubert Humphrey would be rolling on his grave, that we're actually dealing with this slim of pickings. And that the only way that we can provide services is to sort of fight over scraps or to cut off fingers to save hands.

He was a great thinker and once said that the way a society should be judged is how it treats the least And I guess it's just a sad statement that we're in this place, this long after the Great Society. This long after the New Deal where we still don't have the right covenant in our society to make sure that the least of ours have a leg up, a hand up.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:18:30 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Thank you. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:18:32 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'd like to start first by thanking the commissioners and they have done amazing work and I'm most appreciative to all the volunteer hours that that takes and excuse me all the study in the care. And I'm also very appreciative of the nonprofit organizations I know and have been involved with many of them. And it's really high caliber work and amazing dedication.

This year, because of the disasters is really a challenge for everyone but I hadn't fully appreciated until we heard some of the commentary today what this means for non-profits as money is being directed towards Montecito and the recovery efforts there. So that suggests to me that it's important to option four and to kind of make it easier on the nonprofits not to have to respond to a major grant application right now.

It also gives us an opportunity to think more about our own county budget. One thing that I think, I don't fully understand and would like to understand perhaps in light of the Renew 22 is the roles and responsibilities of county and the services we provide. And how that interfaces with the various non-profits. Is there redundancy? Can there be stronger definitions of different roles and responsibilities moving forward?

I think it is clearly a net. I think it's clearly a partnership, but I would like to understand that more going forward if that's at all possible because there may be greater efficiencies yet to be realized if we're clear about that so I'm willing to second Supervisor Wolf's motion when she makes it

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:20:28 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Okay, thank you. I'll throw my comments in now. So first off, I want to thank the CEO because we have options and you provided us options and that's your job. And it's never easy to put cuts to basic services out there and it shows, I guess your vision of reality of what you're seeing and what needs to be done. I also look at this as Human Services Commission has been stagnant for probably the only line item in the budget that's been stagnant for over a decade of 1.2 million and it's really hard to, I think Judith kind of stole my thunder a little bit in that I look at these as, it's really hard to quantify. We're always talking about cost avoidance and we always talk about well if we spend money here, we're going to save money here.

We never seem to save that other money or I don't know what happens to it but when you look at this in Boys & Girls Club and like Jeremy said they've got close to 2,000 kids. If one of those kids, he somehow keeps that kid from going to juvenile hall. That saved us way more than $80,000. And calm if one person doesn't go under our behavioral wellness system or community action commission, one person doesn't go into our social services. Or Good Samaritan, one person isn't and our sheriff doesn't have to go out and arrest somebody and drive them to Santa Barbara and all this stuff just because they're homeless and they're outside.

Cost avoidance, it's the best bang for the buck that I see. But I'm also working under the constraints of what our budget allow us to do as well and I'm looking at this and trying to find a middle ground. Because I really think it's important to be fair to all of our other county employees, and our county departments that are all being asked no matter how great a work they do to take a cut. That's reality.

And so I would not want to mess with any of the best practices in basic services awardees. I think that goes without saying but on the mini grants We could look at how effective that they've been, and I understand that they're great. And they pay for training and outreach and those types of things. Everybody's business model should be able to absorb a $5,000 hit. If you can't then you have a very bad business model.

And so collectively though, that does save us a little over $70,000. And I think it would send a message to the rest of our departments that everybody, everybody we are a team but everybody on this team is going to share a little bit of the pain. And so you know I also understand this idea of the quick turnaround. So I actually do like option two. I don't like it, but again this is reality.

My inclination would be to eliminate the mini grants and then extend for one year the rest of the existing contracts that we have. And while I know that that would bring some pain to some folks, I also think that we're all going to be sharing some pain. So I'm just tossing that out there. Supervisor Wolf.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:24:07 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Thank you, Mr. Chair I'm going to go ahead and make a motion and I'll look to our staff To make sure that the implementation if I'm lucky enough that it passes will work so my my motion is to give direction to the Human Services Commission and To extend some or all of the existing grantees for one year in whole or in part, and publish a new three-year NOFA at the same rate in November 2018.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:24:40 · ≈ 11:24 AM

So my speech had no effect?

2:24 – 2:3125 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:24:46 · ≈ 11:24 AM

It's not that it didn't have an effect. I actually looked when you were talking, well let's get a second and then we

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:24:53 · ≈ 11:24 AM

can discuss.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:24:56 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Supervisors, I think there is something that could satisfy both of you and that is that the mini grants are only for one year already. So extending them for one more year doesn't work. It doesn't work, says Susan. So it's really you're doing a Supervisor Lavanino said if you're going to roll over the other grants, it's for those other two categories because the mini-grants were only for one year anyway.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:25:15 · ≈ 11:25 AM

Okay but then what would happen to that other $70,000 I guess is what I'm saying? Do they go out for other mini-grants or does it go into the other awardees or is it able to be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:25:24 · ≈ 11:25 AM

cut? I would suggest as part of my motion that that $71,000 be allocated

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:25:34 · ≈ 11:25 AM

It's 60,000 just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:25:35 · ≈ 11:25 AM

to

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:25:35 · ≈ 11:25 AM

be clear. It's 60,000 but then when you add it up on the back on our sheet it says 71,000 but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:25:39 · ≈ 11:25 AM

Just to clarify that had a one-time allocation of some leftover monies at 60,00 just so the board is aware.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:25:45 · ≈ 11:25 AM

So Ms. Foley if I wanted to, as part of my motion that $60,000 be used next year so we don't lose the $1,200,000.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:26:06 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Can I make a suggestion that we just suspend it for one year and maybe use it for social service needs in the county?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:26:16 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Okay, why don't we just say-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:26:17 · ≈ 11:26 AM

So that it's expected that it comes back. That it doesn't go away forever.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:26:24 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Does that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:26:24 · ≈ 11:26 AM

work

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:26:24 · ≈ 11:26 AM

with you Ms. Miyasato? Supervisor Wolf to the chair, that's fine. I was going to say another option could be you could ask the Human Services Commission if they want to do another program to allocate that mini-grant for next year. You can send it back to the Human Services Commission as well to ask them to allocate that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:26:42 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Yes, supervisor through the chair one option is to do a new mini grant because that is very quick. That is not something that really needed to go out in November so a mini grant for one year is very quick So you can either do a new one-year mini grant and extend the basic services and best practices, or you can forfeit the mini grant for a year. Or we can ask the commission if they want to fold it into one of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:27:09 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Why don't I say that we direct the Human Services Commission to look at that $60,000 and determine if they want to allocate it this coming year or roll it over to the next cycle. So that would be my motion. And that way gives the human services commission an opportunity to decide what they want to do with that 60,000.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:27:37 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair, I actually was influenced by what Vice-Chair Lavinino had to say about a signal in the small grants and there is additional administrative work so I would be inclined to go with his suggestion and I thought perhaps Supervisor Williams was open to that as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:28:05 · ≈ 11:28 AM

I am, that would be my preference. I think that we shouldn't make those mini-grants go away forever. We should have the expectation that it would come back but that it'd be redirected at least for a year or two to social services and other needs of the county. To me, that's one That's one child welfare worker, that's one foster care recruiter. That is one person that can make a big difference and the same folks are being hurt by our lack of that.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:48 · ≈ 11:28 AM

If I could just comment,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:28:49 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Supervisor Wolf.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:49 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Thank you. You know, I know that these options are talking about well if we take the million dollars from Human Services Commission we could fund child welfare workers and eligibility workers. For those of you who weren't at budget hearings last year, I fought long and hard to get those child welfare workers and eligibility workers. And so I don't think it's one or the other.

I think, you know to right now be looking at our budget that we're going to be talking about in four months and kind of nickel and diming this commission. I just feel like I don't see the purpose in it. I don't even know why these options were in front of us, these child welfare workers and eligibility workers and so forth. There might be other positions that the county needs to cut that don't impact our whole safety net.

I don't think it's one or the other. I think it's important that we commit to both, because you need those child welfare workers, frontline workers to be online when there is a referral made to them. And then they look at all of the non-profit organizations that we have to make sure that the referrals are made, whether it be to Calm or another organization. So again, the whole system has to work together.

I don't want to get caught up in the $60,000. I just want us to give the Human Services Commission some semblance Of calm, because I do believe that this has been going on for so long. And I also think the non-profits need to know. So, I am actually hearing different things. I heard from Mr. Williams that the 60,000 should maybe go to the department. Can someone help with-? I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:30:59 · ≈ 11:30 AM

think Mr. Williams is gonna make a motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:31:02 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Okay.

2:31 – 2:3315 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31:05 · ≈ 11:31 AM

I will move Supervisor Lavinino's suggestion, which is essentially a hybrid of option two and option four. It's eliminate the mini-grants temporarily and extend for one year the human service fundings for the two other grant categories and revisit a new NOFA next year.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:31:33 · ≈ 11:31 AM

I'm sorry.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction2:31:36 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Chair Williams, could you clarify when you say temporarily? It would help our staff to know if it's at just for one year or would you expect for two years so we're not revisiting the same question next year?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:31:47 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Mr. Williams, could you use my language about instead of the revisit to publish a new three-year NOFA at the same rate in November 2018?

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31:59 · ≈ 11:31 AM

That's a good suggestion, Supervisor Wolf because I do believe that the NOFA is pretty important. So let me rephrase that. I will make a motion that is option four to extend existing grantees for one year. and issue a new NOFA next year, but that eliminates the mini grants for two years. And we'll hopefully be able to bring them back the third year.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:32:35 · ≈ 11:32 AM

Mr. Chair I would second that motion.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:32:37 · ≈ 11:32 AM

We're going to need a roll call.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:39 · ≈ 11:32 AM

Can I just ask Ms. Foley, does that work?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:32:44 · ≈ 11:32 AM

Yes we can live with whatever you recommend. The NOFA that comes out would just be without the mini grants for the first year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:54 · ≈ 11:32 AM

Right. And so we're extending this year's NOFAs and then it'll come, so we're not going to have this discussion again because you will automatically issue another three-year NOFA in November of 2018. That is consistent with my motion. Yeah okay thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:33:17 · ≈ 11:33 AM

You good Mona? Okay. So Mr. Allen

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:33:24 · ≈ 11:33 AM

Mr. Adam? No. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Ms. Wolfe? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye, Mr. Williams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:33:32 · ≈ 11:33 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:33:33 · ≈ 11:33 AM

Passes 4 to 1.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:33:33 · ≈ 11:33 AM

Okay yeah All right so item one child support services Mr. Allen

2:33 – 2:516 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:33:54 · ≈ 11:33 AM

Chair Lavinino. Item number one is from Child Support Services. It's a hearing to consider recommendation regarding the county participation in government alliance on race and equity.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:34:12 · ≈ 11:34 AM

Good morning,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:34:13 · ≈ 11:34 AM

good morning

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:34:14 · ≈ 11:34 AM

I'm Carrie Topliff The director of the child support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interim public health department. Head and I am here today to talk to you about the government alliance on race in equity that we have participated in this year- with me is Nathan Nunes who represents language line a vendor that Make your board meetings accessible to Spanish speakers. And also with me is Anna Nguyen who represents the Just Communities, one of the trainers that helped provide this program for us this year.

I'll start by saying that we in the Health and Human Services Division are often faced with a great divide between the haves and have-nots in our community. And we often wonder about the structural reasons why sometimes it's so hard to make an impact on improving people's lives. You may be aware that Santa Barbara, Santa Maria is considered to be the sixth most inequitable community in the United States in terms of income distribution The lowest 20% of wage earners in our communities earn an average of $13,700 a year. Whereas the top 5% earns an average of $478,000 a year.

These are the kinds of things that we were considering as we agreed to join this group. I have to say for me personally, I don't think I would have framed it around race. I find as a white person, I've almost been brought up to think that it's not polite to talk about race. It's something uncomfortable. It is something that I worry I'll say the wrong thing and who knows? I might even do that here today.

Here goes anyway. So I would like to tell you about our team. It was comprised of myself and Susan Klein Rothschild of Public Health, Yanaris Muniz of Behavioral Wellness, Naomi Kovacs of Supervisor Wolf's office and she is here today as is Kelly McLaughlin of Child Support. I can't speak to the motivations of each of the team members, but I will say that we all found the experience very enriching. And I also do want to note that even though we had a very small team it's not indicative of the interest that was felt within the county leadership.

There was just a concern about the time commitment and as you know it has turned out that we've had a very busy year at the county. So I'm going to introduce Ana Nguyen and she's gonna tell you a little bit about Just Communities, which is the local sponsor of this initiative.

CommentAnna NguyenProposedself-stated2:37:31 · ≈ 11:37 AM

Thank you. Hello, and thank you for the opportunity to speak here today. My name is Anna Nguyen. Excuse me, I am a program coordinator with Just Communities. Just Communities is a local non-profit organization. We work to foster an equitable and inclusive central coast in which all people are connected and respected. Where all people have value and voice. We do this by working with schools, government agencies, law enforcement, other non-profits in the community at large to address issues of racism, sexism, classism, heterosexism and other forms of inequality and to transform our schools, organizations and communities into places of opportunity for all.

In early 2017, we entered into a partnership with the Center for Social Inclusion. A national non-profit organization with a similar mission to bring the GARE program to Santa Barbara County. GARE stands for Government Alliance on Race and Equity, a year-long program that helps government employees from various jurisdictions and agencies learn about talk about and take action to address racial inequality in their communities and to promote racial equity in their jurisdictions.

As you can see, GEAR has worked with jurisdictions across the country and is especially active in California. We are proud that we were able to bring the GEAR program to Santa Barbara County and we're even more proud of what the 2017 cohort has done. Thank you.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:39:10 · ≈ 11:39 AM

Thank you. I wanted to share this cartoon because I believe it makes a very graphic presentation of the difference between equality and equity. We pride ourselves as a culture on our sense of equality, but I don't believe we pay enough attention to the more subtle concepts of equity. As a parent, I wouldn't hesitate to distribute the crate so that all members of my family could see over the fence.

Yet we often cling to ideas of equal treatment that disregard the fact of individual strengths, weaknesses and the way that our systems have been rigged in a way that favors one group over another. These are some of the unconscious assumptions that we explored during this learning year. So what did we do? We learned about the biology of race, and here's the learning about that. There is no biology of race. There are no genetic markers for race. The most divergent humans on the planet have genetic makeup that is almost identical.

We also learned about the history of race in the United States. Certainly we learned about the horrors of slavery. I was shocked to discover that I was born into a world where whites only restrictions on home ownership, business opportunities, medical care, bathrooms was part of the law of the land not overturned by the Supreme Court until 1954. We learned that the GI Bill, that allowed so many Americans to buy homes and build family wealth through home equity was not available to blacks because lenders were legally allowed to deny credit to anyone wanting to buy property in a neighborhood with black occupants.

A practice known as redlining because of the colored lines that lenders drew around certain black neighborhoods where they would not make loans. We examined the costs associated with racial inequity. There are so many ways to think about costs. As someone trained in economics, I think of the multiplier effect of educated people encouraged to achieve their potential working and growing the economy to the benefit of everyone.

When that doesn't happen we can see the cost of poverty, poor health, addictions and crime. We learned about the ways that the environment shapes our beliefs We had to confront the fact that we are all biased. Harvard has an online test that you can take to confirm it. We grow up having the world interpreted for us. I, born into a world where there were laws proclaiming whites only shouldn't be surprised if I absorb those beliefs that whites were at the top of the pecking order though I certainly don't consciously believe that skin color is a determinant of your value. There are subtle messages everywhere and some not so subtle.

Just last year Dove put out a huge ad campaign showing that you could go from being an unhappy brown-skinned person We talked about our personal experiences with race. Race ends up being a very personal topic. We delicately probed others about their experiences growing up. Though many of the people we spoke to were longtime friends, we discovered new facts of their history.

I talked to a Mexican-American girlfriend who told me about growing up in Carpinteria how there was only one neighborhood where the Mexicans were allowed to live and there was a locked camp across the street where all the farm workers were brought every day at dusk. Our experiences of being welcome in the world and feeling safe in the world come to find very tremendously.

We developed a language for talking about race. I'm not the only one who finds talking about race to be difficult, but it's hard to examine the hidden biases without surfacing some of the code. One of our cohort remembered driving out of his parents' Jewish neighborhood and every time they crossed the intersection into a black neighborhood, his parents would activate the automatic door locks.

That's a message and if you don't examine it more deeply, all it means to a kid growing up is that black people are dangerous. We learned about dog whistle politics. The idea is that the whistle is pitched to a sound that only a dog can hear. Likewise, it's a phrase or statement that is code for something else whether we say we want to put our children in a good school or live in a good neighborhood when what we really mean is we don't want people of color there.

Or if we swoon over Confederate soldiers when what we really mean is that we don' believe blacks are equals of whites. Not everyone can hear it, but those who are attuned to it know exactly what the shared value is conveying. We made a commitment to use our power to create more equality. Our laws no longer promote whites only, but are there ways in which our practices are built to assumptions that are not true for everyone?

We have built a diverse workforce that mirrors the variety of our community. But are we equally welcoming to all employees? Does everyone feel that they have the ability to grow and promote? What can we do to create more equality for people of color in our community? We decided on a project I think you already know what we chose to do, but I'm going to leave you in suspense for now and not tell you.

As a group our Santa Barbara group peeled off from our Ventura cohort and developed our own We Hold These Truths statement. And this is it. Everyone is capable of more when everyone is included and given the tools and opportunities they need to flourish and reach their full potential. Our community thrives as a result, we will stand up to institutional racism discrimination and inequity Our policies, practices and programs will promote fairness, access to services and meaningful community participation.

We commit to transforming the organizational culture to eliminate barriers and to benefit all members of the community. I think it's important to point out too that we never want to get into a position of suggesting it's us doing something for them. It's important that we understand, we as a community are a diverse place and we benefit from a full flourishing of its diversity and opportunities.

One of the ideas that we talked about had to do with unconscious or implicit bias In our culture, it's as deep as white being the color of purity and black standing for evil. Darkness? Not a good thing. Some of us recently participated in the excellent civility training being conducted by Human Resources. We really liked its messages of treating others with respect and we thought that Incorporating some training on unconscious bias might enhance that training.

People could explore some of the reasons they might favor one co-worker over another or make assumptions about people from different backgrounds and what that background would suggest about their intent for the future. We still think this is a good idea as does our Human Resources Director, Lori Gentles, and we are exploring that for the future. The project that we did decide on though has to do with language access.

In Santa Barbara County, a full 30% of our residents are native-born Spanish speakers. Almost half of our population is now Hispanic and Spanish is the language of the home in a third of our households. Those of us who provide services using federal funding have consciously hired bilingual staff and translated written materials for decades. Countywide, bilingual pay is extended to almost 1,200 employees.

Our team felt that this was an area where we could enhance and expand the efforts already underway at Santa Barbara County. We also believe that people can be shut out of our community when they don't understand what is going on and efforts to be more inclusive, which would enrich us all. So we started by deciding to come up with a baseline so that we could understand how we are doing right now at Santa Barbara County.

Like many people, the first way that we would approach an organization that we were interested in finding out about would be to approach it through the websites. So we reviewed 27 county department websites. We were very happy to find that 23 had a Spanish language information available. However, we did notice that most of those were translated using Google Translate and our native speakers of Spanish felt that the translations were not good and they were confusing. So we've talked with other department heads about using human translators to translate some of our more important online information.

We also called 80 published county phone lines during business hours, speaking only in Spanish and found that we had less than half able to do spontaneous appropriate Spanish response. And then we called 80 published county phone lines after business hours and found that of those 80s, 32 had a Spanish language option. We felt that it would be very easy to add that to the others who don't currently have that.

So, one of the things that I've been doing with the other department heads is letting them know some of the things that we have available to us right now. And one of the ways that became very important to us was during the fire and flood that we had recently. We made a very conscious effort to do press releases, video clips, our county webpages, information scrolls, Facebook and Twitter in both Spanish and English. The very day after the Thomas fire began I got a call from our Ventura GARE cohort Who said, we can't believe what a great job you're doing with the Spanish language. It's so much better than anything we've been able to do here. How are you doing it?

We as you know were written up in Los Angeles Times for that. The governor's office complimented us. I think that we got a great outpouring of gratitude from the community that people were not left out of this very important information. So we showed that we have a lot of tools in place so that we can do these kinds of efforts and how very important they are to the community. I'm going to introduce Nathan Nunez right now from Language Line, and he is going to show you what is possible right now. We have a contract with Language Line. Many of the departments use it for more exotic languages because we tend to have our In-house staff able to translate Spanish.

But this is something that you could use here, the cost is 99 cents a minute.

2:51 – 2:5615 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:51:34 · ≈ 11:51 AM

Good morning everybody. Thank you very much. All right so as Kerry said this is something that is available currently and it's just a matter of how to maximize the resources that you already have. So quick agenda here, why language access is important as Kerry hit right now. We'll kind of cover just a little bit more about it as well as identifying how to easily identify the preferred language and how to use this service.

So first of all, why use language services? First and foremost, it's the right thing to do. Like it says, it improves customer service and builds loyalty. Having your constituents being able to communicate to them directly in language, in a language that they understand makes a huge difference. If I came up here and spoke Tagalog or something like that that nobody here spoke, obviously the impact would be very minimal to you not being able to understand what that is. So being able to communicate with somebody in language is paramount.

It improves your staff efficiency. So when you're talking about budget constraints and things like that, being able to maximize your employees' times by being able to directly interact with those people without the miscommunication or the misunderstandings will not only save time but it also in the end saves money. And finally, mitigates risk and reduces the expanse associated with a lack of communication. So not only the financial risk associated with liability or anything like that should any kind of miscommunication happen but also making sure that you get the right message across, the intended message across the first time around.

Now, that was the carrot. The stick side of it, it's the law. You have, like Kerry mentioned, Executive Order 13166. There is also Title VI of the 1964 Act and a handful of other ones here as you can see. Those all show that compliance is mandatory for any individual receiving federal funding which, as you are a county here, you do obviously receive. So on the good side of it, like I said, it does give you an opportunity to save money. On the negative side of it, it gives you the opportunity to avoid any kind of federal risk or anything like that.

So now that we've gotten through that, how do you quickly identify the language? Now one of the things that is available through your service is being able to get a plethora of resources completely free of charge. It comes with your account. So things like identification cards so if somebody comes up to counters having these kind of things placed there will allow somebody to easily recognize not only do you support them in their language but it also allows your staff to quickly identify the language and connect with the corresponding interpreter.

Now at this point, Carrie would like to do a quick demonstration to show how the platform actually works. So what I'm going to do is call directly into our platform as if I was calling in to get an interpreter.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:54:21 · ≈ 11:54 AM

Okay and I'm introducing Josie Felix of Child Support who is going to address you in Spanish.

CommentHi ChristopherProposed2:54:30 · ≈ 11:54 AM

Are

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:30 · ≈ 11:54 AM

you ready?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:54:30 · ≈ 11:54 AM

I am ready.

CommentHi ChristopherProposed2:54:31 · ≈ 11:54 AM

Muy buenos dias miembros del consejo. Como todos sabemos, nuestro condado sufrió incendios y el deslave que devastó nuestra comunidad. Quiero agradecerles la atención a nuestra comunidad en comunicar mucha de la información en nuestro idioma, el español. Eso ayudó a que las familias estuvieran informadas de lo que estaba sucediendo a su alrededor y los servicios que estaban disponibles para ellos. Muchas gracias por apoyar a nuestra comunidad en tiempos difíciles, especialmente nuestro idioma. Muchas gracias.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:55:01 · ≈ 11:55 AM

So at that point, I'm going to hold you right there. So at that point if I was a staff member not speaking Spanish, I would recognize I need language services available. So what I have in front of me here is my personal account. Now just to give you guys a heads up, I am on the bottom of the queue here. So I would have somebody come in that doesn't speak Spanish. I would immediately dial the 800 number and we'll put this on speaker hopefully you can connect here. Welcome

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:55:22 · ≈ 11:55 AM

to Language Line Solutions. Please enter your six digit client ID.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:55:31 · ≈ 11:55 AM

You were supposed to have done that before Josie got here. Sorry. You're making this look bad.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:55:43 · ≈ 11:55 AM

So this is the full process start to finish. I mean, somebody would walk in. I had no front warning or anything like that. I'm dialing in directly as if I was somebody just at the front counter not expecting to get anybody.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:55:54 · ≈ 11:55 AM

Although you could put it on your speaker slip if somebody wanted to address you in Spanish and then you would be ready

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:56:02 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Exactly. So if you were calling out to somebody, you could do the same thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:56:06 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Thank you for calling. My name is Christopher. Interpreter 8248501 for Spanish. Is your customer with you or would he need me to call him for you?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:56:15 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Hi Christopher my customer is with me here and they can go ahead and speak now. So just speak directly into the phone.

CommentHi ChristopherProposed2:56:26 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Buenas tardes. Voy a dar una información y quería saber si lo puede usted traducir al inglés.

2:56 – 3:0410 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:56:36 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Buenos

CommentHi ChristopherProposed2:56:41 · ≈ 11:56 AM

días miembros del consejo. Como todos sabemos nuestro condado sufrió incendios y el deslave que desbastó nuestra comunidad Quiero agradecerles la atención a nuestra comunidad en comunicar mucha de la información en nuestro idioma, el español. Eso ayudó a que las familias estuvieran informadas de lo que estaba sucediendo a su alrededor y los servicios que estaban disponibles para ellos. Muchas gracias por ayudar a nuestra comunidad en tiempos difíciles especialmente en nuestro idioma

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:57:26 · ≈ 11:57 AM

So one of the negative things of using a cell phone in here is I have one bar and unfortunately, the interpreter dropped. So we can try again. I feel like if we're using the cell phone, we're going to have the same issue. But as you could see, the main issue there, the connect time for that interpreter, what was that? Maybe six seconds from once I dialed in. The entire process took maybe 40 seconds.

So being able to, like Carrie was saying, immediately connect with somebody even if I have no language experience whatsoever to be able to connect with somebody within 40 seconds to have somebody who is qualified to speak that language. I think obviously makes a huge difference on everybody. And again, I apologize for the technical difficulties.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:58:05 · ≈ 11:58 AM

Wait! Josie could translate. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:58:08 · ≈ 11:58 AM

Josie can translate as

CommentHi ChristopherProposed2:58:08 · ≈ 11:58 AM

well. Basically, I'm just saying good morning to all of you. As we all know our county suffered the fire and the flooding And it devastated our community. I would like to thank you for the attention that you gave our community in giving the information in Spanish. It helped our community be informed of everything that was going on and the services that were available to them.

Thank you very much for assisting our community in these difficult times and in our language.

PresenterCarrie Topliff Thechild support department and for much of two thousand seventeen also the interimProposedself-stated2:58:45 · ≈ 11:58 AM

Okay, so give me my PowerPoint back. So a somewhat rocky demonstration, but I assure you that it could be ready for prime time very quickly. The other thing that we're trying to do is improve our Spanish language county websites. Even though I operate in a federal zone of Spanish language compliance, I was distressed to find out that the child support website Translations were not all that good, so I have had those translated by an actual human and they're much better now. So I'm very pleased with how that worked out. We also struggled in the Emergency Operations Center to get sufficient staff to do translations and interpreting. So we think it's possible in the future that we might want to enhance some of who are receiving bilingual pay and are able to carry on Spanish conversations so that we could have more in-house interpreters and translators.

We'd like to incorporate the implicit bias training into our workforce development efforts, and then we'd like to leverage resources available through the Government Alliance on Race and Equity and Just Communities in 2018 and beyond. So that's my presentation. Thank you very much for your attention.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:00:18 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Do we have any public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:00:23 · ≈ 12:00 PM

We have two requests to speak, Mr. Caldwell and Mr. Armaderas.

PresenterAndy CaldwellColabProposedself-stated3:00:36 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Mr. Chair, members of the board, I'm Andy Caldwell representing Colab. This issue is why I am involved with Colab It has to do with income inequality, not racism or discrimination. Listen to this quote. This is the quote I used to use introducing CoLab to people. The cost of preserving the high quality of life in Santa Barbara County includes limiting opportunities for others.

It limits economic mobility, but that is a legitimate political choice. I'm going to say that again. The cost of preserving the high quality of life in Santa Barbara County includes limiting opportunities for others. It limits economic mobility, but that is a legitimate political choice. That quote was from the county's planning and development director around 30 years ago.

We have an elitist community in the South County, and I actually even heard an economist come before the board say we don't need manufacturing and industry jobs here. Monterey doesn't have them, Carmel doesn't have them. We don't need them. We have enough wealth in this community that we don't need those pollution causing industries blah, blah, blah. Well, guess what gives people upward mobility? Your staff report says why is income inequality growing? It's growing because of your policies.

The reason this is my story is I grew up poor and I still couldn't get a good job in the white collar world even with a college education. I went into industry. And I eventually got promoted to the point, I was sitting in the chair hiring people from field work to factory work. I grew up poor most of my best friends or dads are from Mexico their oldest siblings were from Mexico and they had a good life because their dads worked in Lompoc either at the prison base or John Mansville. Mostly John Mansfield, which is now God knows what the name of it is now. The point here is because of your concerns for environmental issues you have made sure that we don't have manufacturing industry growing whether it's the oil industry. Union Sugar's gone, Arrow Automotive's gone, Santa Maria Chili's gone.

We've lost thousands of jobs that people with limited education and limited English speaking skills could get, and work towards a middle class income. It's not racism, it's the fact that we have 20 to 30 thousand people in this valley who don't speak English or Spanish. They may have only gone to sixth grade. What kind of jobs are they going to get? High tech, you guys say we want high tech, we want this, we want that. These people can work with their hands, they're good with that and they could do manual labor and earn good money if we weren't destroying the sector of our economy.

And finally With regard to race and equity, Asians in America are at the top of the socioeconomic food chain. And there are restrictions on Asians getting into our best universities. Explain that in the context of racism and bigotry. Thank you.

3:04 – 3:093 turns

CommentJoe ArmendarizProposedself-stated3:04:08 · ≈ 12:04 PM

Members of the board, I'm Joe Armendariz. I don't know why you forced me to do this and then stole my speech. Actually, I have to confess, Even means frankly, particularly in the context of child support services. By the way it was supposed to be a 15 minute item that's lasted over 30 minutes and I still don't understand what we're talking about. Somebody quoted Hubert Humphrey.

Let me quote, I'll see your Hubert Humphrey Dawson, I'll raise you Moses who said let my people go. And I would submit to you, somebody who was born and raised and grew up poor in East LA. I think my street credentials hopefully speak for themselves. I grew up in a Mexican neighborhood. I grew up in a Mexican community. I grew up with Mexicans. That's what I, that's my background. That's my history. And the best way, the best way to empower people is to give them a job.

Is for government to remove the regulatory barriers that allow industries to thrive. I know you're going to have an item in a couple of, either after lunch that talks about creative industries and economic development. As you know, I'm a broken record when it comes to that. We need more economic vitality in Santa Barbara County. We need to do everything we can to empower Various sectors that create upward mobility, particularly for the populations that have been left out historically.

Hubert Humphrey was a bleeding heart liberal. Jack Kemp is a bleeding heart conservative. I identify with that message of rising tide lifts all boats and it really does. I'll just finally leave you with one more quote from another White guy, Steve Case from America Online used to say keep the main thing the main thing. And I think that as the next item comes up and we talk about the fiscal status of the county We really do need to focus on what our county government is doing. And I would submit, with all due respect to the lady who gave the presentation, I don't know if this is what we should be spending a lot of county time and money and effort on. If you want to talk about child support services, why don't we look at ways of empowering fathers to spend more time with their kids?

Why don't we rethink the policy of taking away father's driver's licenses when they get behind a month or two in their child support? Don't take away their business license, allow them to continue working and make money and support their family. Consider and reconsider our tax policy that makes it more difficult to support a family frankly. Not just in Santa Barbara County but in California and indeed the United States. So I think these are all the kinds of policy things that we should be thinking about and talking about and analyzing. I don't think necessarily this is the best use of our time. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:07:00 · ≈ 12:07 PM

Is that closed public comment? Okay, I'll bring it back to the board for comments. See a plethora of lights, there we go, Supervisor

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction3:07:08 · ≈ 12:07 PM

Adam. Everybody wants to weigh in on this painful subject. With all due respect Ms. Topliff, you know I just found this whole presentation really cringeworthy and offensive and I could have been pitched a translating service without calling me a racist. And that's how I feel, is I just got called a racist and since I don't understand that, I'm just in denial. I'm sure if I go to the re-education camp or wherever that is they'll teach me about that, I am sure.

But I grew up with Mexicans too. And you know, I just am so deeply offended by this whole treatment of the subject and especially in the context of bringing us a translation service which is fine, that's great. The lead up was horrifically offensive. And I shouldn't have to justify myself, and I'm placed in this position. This whole meeting has really been one of my worst. Prepping for this meeting was just really painful for me. In fact yesterday, I gotta tell you, Physically sick, I just didn't feel good because I knew I got to come and do this. And anybody that thinks that it's easy for me, you know, I am a little bit of a bomb thrower and I am that guy that got elected to say controversial things and things that most people don't want to say.

And anybody who thinks that's easy is wrong. But I just feel like I shouldn't have to justify myself, and I feel like that's a position I just got put in. And I just find it offensive. And there's a lot of other things I could say but I still don't feel like

3:09 – 3:142 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:09:25 · ≈ 12:09 PM

Okay. I could, but Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:09:34 · ≈ 12:09 PM

Thank you Mr. Chair and thank you Ms. Topla for your presentation and to those of you who are sitting here. Thank you Anna and I'm sorry I didn't get your name. Nathan. Thank you. And I really want to thank Naomi Naomi Kovacs from my office who spent time with the cohort in getting us to this place. And I think that what has been discussed here today is not something that is in a vacuum, as Ms. Topliff mentioned there I think a recognition in the county, as you pointed out our HR Ms. Gentles already has civility training. Wow what a concept right? To be civil to incorporate civility training which would include unconscious bias.

I think we could be very reactive and humiliated, but I think that there is something to what your presentation talked about which is unconscious bias. And not only is it being discussed in HR, but as I sit on the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council We have a program that is looking at unconscious bias and how our departments are responding to this. I think our sheriff's department I want to say our Sheriff's Department, it could have been Santa Barbara Police was involved in training on recognizing unconscious bias. I don't think it's a bad thing to acknowledge something.

Every person is different and You know argue with with supervisor Adam and I'm always glad that he speaks his mind. But I think in general this is a really this is really positive this is about. My mind, this is about when we talk about government for the people. It's for all the people. It's for providing access to what we do in government and that includes what we just saw happen with the disasters. And I really do thank all of the people who were involved in translation Because people needed to know and get the information. And it was done so well, and whoever was involved with that my kudos and my hats go out to them because people needed and wanted that information. And I don't know if it's a different department or in my office, I have Hilda who speaks Spanish.

We don't get very many Spanish speakers but I think having someone who does speak Spanish is really important and who is available if anyone on the fourth floor needs someone to speak. I didn't know we have this service available and I would like to learn more about it. But again, I think that and I'm glad you picked up on language. I think that was what you said was the main focus of today's presentation because languages are great obviously it's our great communicator.

And people have to know what government services are available we need to know when people have problems and the best and only way to do that is to communicate. This whole language access program that we have in the county, I think is really interesting and something that we should maybe talk about more. The board of supervisor meetings, I know when Supervisor Carbajal was here it was something that we tried to get additional funding for, for interpreter services but, and I know Mike Allen came up with A very creative plan if we needed those services, but I do think we could do better.

People at home who can't come to our meetings could- I know that Santa Barbara City Council has their meetings interpreted on TV. We don't do that. I feel like we're very much removed from a certain segment of our community and again, I go back to our main mission which is government for the people And the best way to reach them is to be able to communicate with them, either in written form or verbal form. Or as we saw so much with sign language.

So I thank you for your presentation and thank you to Naomi for taking the time and to all the people who took the time to bring some awareness to this issue. Thank you Mr Chair.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:14 – 3:229 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:14:56 · ≈ 12:14 PM

Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:15:00 · ≈ 12:15 PM

So I also want to thank the county employees, Naomi and others and Carrie that participated in this because I think this effort is the conversation is important and the initiative that come out of the conversation is important so let me deal first with the latter if we're not if we don't get good at translation services okay Some people have had us to need to translate English in disaster services to English.

So if we, if we have English speakers who have need of translation services you know when we're dealing with things like voluntary or recommended right? We've essentially had to translate that word Let alone all the, if you can envision that as a problem. Let's then envision how much more it is if we're talking about Spanish speakers or people who speak Spanish but their first language is a native language and so we have to get better at this just for the basic public safety of our community.

And then going back, I guess to the conversation about race. I guess it to me the fact that if we can't have a conversation about race without people getting really offended that were even talking about race is kind of evidence that we still have a major issue. I believe that we will never address our moral inconsistencies as a community that have been pointed out so eloquently by Mr. Caldwell, we'll never address those moral inconsistencies Without recognizing that race and class are both factors in this, both the factors in nimbyism.

It's factors when we live in a world where people are only looking at it through their lens And I think conversations about race are really uncomfortable, but they're needed so that people can rise above only looking at the world through their narrow lens. And so I want to give some encouragement to the staff that were involved and to this initiative. And I actually think that the only way we can address that inconsistency that was pointed out by Mr. Caldwell is by talking about race and class as it affects the economic, environmental, and social policies of the county.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:17:49 · ≈ 12:17 PM

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.853:17:51 · ≈ 12:17 PM

Thank you Mr. Chair, I will be brief but I just wanted to thank Ms. Topliff and all who worked on this. It was very helpful to me to have this seated within a larger picture and clearly cultural ethnic economic differences it is Black History Month after all we had a resolution but It is the tenderest nerve and we aren't going to fully heal until we can talk about it. So I appreciate that context, and I know it took a lot of courage to come up here because we have a lot of power. And it took a lot of courage to come out and lay out your bigger picture for us all. I also appreciate that you focused narrowly on an issue and you came up with a solution.

My husband doesn't hear so well, and he often forgets to put on his hearing aids. And I find myself sort of is he not tracking? Or is it just his hearing aids? It's really hard when people can't fully understand. It isolates, they can't participate and you're left wondering well why is that? So I believe that language access is absolutely critical and people can't take advantage of what we have to offer. They can't contribute what they have to offer If we don't reach out and find better ways to interact. So I'm very glad that you brought this before us, and I'm glad that you were able to bring us to something very specific and concrete that we can do to make our county better.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:19:30 · ≈ 12:19 PM

Thank you. Okay, I'm kind of all over the place on this. So I do represent a district that's 75% Hispanic and I'm married to a woman who speaks Spanish at work quite a bit. And I have an 88 year old mother-in-law that speaks Spanish in my house and she doesn't listen very well either but. No, she doesn't listen very well. She hears fine. So, but I like the idea that we're focusing on translation. That's so key because it's not just the emergencies, but to me it just seems strange that we would spend hundreds of millions of dollars on services available to people that might not exactly pick up all the nuances and aren't getting the services that are required.

I also have to kind of agree with Supervisor Adams And I'm not sure if that's just the subject matter, maybe it is. It just really, I don't know, made me feel. I don't know if that was the intention or not, but it does. And everybody takes it differently. I didn't like the way it was brought forward, but the bottom line is I agree with the finding that we need to spend more money on and maybe not so much more money, but we just need to make things access better.

So I think it was a receiving file, so if I can just get a motion receiving file? And also the CEQA portion of the- Okay, perfect. So we just need a roll call?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21:15 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Lavenino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:21:18 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21:18 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Ms. Wolfe? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams? 5-0. Okay,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.833:21:25 · ≈ 12:21 PM

now I'm going to make a bunch of people upset because I think there's three different people that would like to present right now That item went way over what we had anticipated lunch is already cold So what we're gonna do is we're gonna go ahead and take a break for lunch and we will come back And we'll figure out which item we're gonna hear first because I know a lot of different people need to get back to Santa Barbara so We will take we have no Yeah, there'll be a Rochambeau contest out here.

So we don't have any closed session so I'm going to leave it up to the board of when you would like to come back. Half hour? We'll come back at 1 o'clock. How's that?

3:24 – 4:041 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:48 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Music you Yeah. Hello. Bye! Good morning, everyone. ♪ Welcome to You.

4:05 – 4:1417 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:05:04 · ≈ 1:05 PM

So we're back, where we're going to reconvene. And Mr. Allen can you read in item number two please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:05:15 · ≈ 1:05 PM

Chair Lavinino and members of the board, item two is from the County Executive Office in the auditor controller. It's a hearing to receive and file per the provisions of government code section 29126.2, the fiscal year 2017-18 budget and financial status report as of December 31, 2017 showing the status of appropriations and financing for all department budgets adopted by the board. Okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:05:39 · ≈ 1:05 PM

Mr. Faber,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:05:39 · ≈ 1:05 PM

there you are.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:05:41 · ≈ 1:05 PM

Mr. Chair, thank you and good afternoon. So our purpose today is really to provide you an update, really a snapshot in time of how the county's budget has been performing for the first two quarters of the current fiscal year. Important to note is that the numbers that we're talking about are really as of December 31st and so importantly do not include the impact of the mudslides that we experienced in January.

So as I go through there there are Within the general fund, two reportable variances. And you'll recall reportable variances for general fund departments are those departments whose performance is plus or minus $300,000. Contrast that with the variance threshold for the special revenue and other funds there are three reportable variances within those departments and within those categories the variance threshold is 500,000 The good news is 66 out of the 68 departments and funds are either positive or at budget, and they're included in your board package and a colorful chart. And I'll talk about that in a moment. But as I mentioned, perhaps the most important bullet point on this slide is that the impacts from the full impacts of the Thomas fire in December and the January 9th mud debris flow are not known at this time.

That continues to be a moving figure for us and we've reported earlier to your board preliminarily that number looked countywide. To all departments of about $38, $39 million. That number as recently as this morning continues to escalate. So our current projection is it could reach as high as $50 million. We'll continue to monitor that and report back to your board on a regular basis.

Within the general fund again for December 31st performance, two reportable variances within General Revenues and the Sheriff's Department. General Revenues is the department where we collect and show the discretionary revenues received by the general fund that is performing above our projected level currently about 868,000 to the good. Sheriff's Department is continuing to show a negative variance of 902. This is an improvement over their Q1 estimate, but it is still in the red and the other departments are tracking either on or ahead of budget.

Turning to general revenues specifically you can see here on this chart The breakdown of property taxes and where those are falling, they're pretty much on target. $380,000 at the moment projected to be a shortfall in our general fund discretionary property tax revenues. This number is likely to grow as a negative number. As we move forward, as we present the third quarter report it'll have the full impact or estimated impact of property tax loss as relates to both the Thomas DeFire and debris flow. So I expect this to not be as This would be a much larger negative number in Q3 report. We'll continue to monitor that and report back to your board. Other than that, most of the discretionary revenues are performing kind of on target. You see some pluses and minuses there.

The largest plus is an RDA dissolution proceeds. That was not budgeted and that was received $1.4 million. The number at the very bottom, or second to the bottom, the Interfund transfers in and out is really just a timing issue within the Auto Controller's Office. And so it is not an alarming number for us. So all in all, for December 31st our projection was general revenues to positive $868,000.

Turn to the Sheriff's Department, and I believe the undersheriff is in Santa Barbara if there are questions of him. The salaries and benefits are estimated to be a net $1.6 million in the red that it has made up 3.7 million over expense in overtime and about 2.1 under spent in other salaries and benefits accounts. The additional revenues and cost savings that they're able to realize about another 700,000 to the good.

As of December 31st they had 49 vacant funded positions. Staying within the special revenue and the other funds in total about positive $1.8 million. The three reportable variances in those departments. Mental health services fund, Fund 44 is showing a projection of negative 2.1 million for the year and we'll talk more about that in a moment. Workers comp self insurance because premiums were lower than we had originally budgeted is showing a positive 1.4 and the fire fund is performing well at estimated to be a positive 836,000.

Currently focusing on mental health services fund, the main drivers of variance are not a surprise. These are the issues we continue to watch and monitor with the department and with your board on each quarterly update. Utilization of state hospital beds in excess of what adopted level that's trending so that will be overspent about $1.1 million. The use of out-of-county IMD beds, 900,000 negative trend there.

Puff revenue because of the mix of billable and non-billable admin versus IST days 1.2 million offset partially by anticipated revenues and salary savings. We discussed this in greater detail in the board letter but that is some realignment dollars that are coming to the department higher than budgeted. Your board will recall that in the current year adopted budget, we did augment the mental health budget with some additional one-time and ongoing funds to $4 million. We were hoping to not see as negative numbers as we're currently seeing but the trends and the problems within the mental health arena and the drivers that are somewhat outside the control, county's control continued to plague us.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:11:57 · ≈ 1:11 PM

Supervisor Wolf?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:12:00 · ≈ 1:12 PM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just went back to our board letter. Do you have it there, Mr Frapwell?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:12:09 · ≈ 1:12 PM

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:12:10 · ≈ 1:12 PM

On page five it's the chart of the puff beds. Is that coming up in another slide?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:12:17 · ≈ 1:12 PM

This one is next.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:12:18 · ≈ 1:12 PM

Yeah, there you go. Well is that your next slide?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:12:21 · ≈ 1:12 PM

It is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:12:22 · ≈ 1:12 PM

okay. So I'll ask the question now the sick it looks like the 60 ist Amount is much less than we've seen before Yet, I thought you said in your previous slide that it was It was trending up higher. Can you go back to your previous slide? This is out of county IMD beds trending, okay but our in-county is much better.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:12:52 · ≈ 1:12 PM

Supervisor Wolf for the chair. So on the PUF revenues, we are still expecting to be under collected in PUF revenues and that's because of the payer mix, the admin versus the IST days is not as favorable as we anticipated when we adopted the budget so we're still showing a 1.2. Admittedly though, the performance or the mix, payer mix for this last quarter was better than the first quarter so that's positive and we're hoping that trend continues.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:13:21 · ≈ 1:13 PM

It's much it's. Well yes and the next slide that's like the best news I've seen in a long time. That's 60 is a real big improvement.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction4:13:33 · ≈ 1:13 PM

Supervisor Wolf to the chair. I want to thank you for recognizing that our your staff has done a great job and working together Terry's led that group with the public defender and others from our public safety groups To really work on solutions for IST so that's in part what we're seeing They're still continuing to try to get a court dedicated to that time then that's still being worked through with the courts But they have been focusing in and I think you see the results of reduction. Yeah, it's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:14:00 · ≈ 1:14 PM

really incredible So thank you for Whoever is doing that, they're doing a great job. Thank you.

4:14 – 4:2121 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:14:13 · ≈ 1:14 PM

Continuing so yes to recap this the most favorable thing on this chart is really the shrinking of the red component That is where we have the greatest amount of general fund cost or county costs And so a lot of effort, as our CEO has mentioned, has gone into trying to continue to shrink that and address those issues. Workers comp really same positive variance that we noted here board in the Q1 report and this is just the only drivers that are actual insurance premium was less than we had budgeted.

Fire fund, main drivers of the variance are vacant positions during the first six months of fiscal year. The service supplies continue to be rejected at under budget levels and their revenues due to taxes and service revenue is greater than they'd originally anticipated. So all in all fire fund expected to end in a positive balance at the moment $836,000. So real quickly, and I promise to keep this short to the chairman.

Real quickly the signal chart which is attached your board letters also here on the slide green indicators next to department names are positive those are those departments who are operating within their appropriations and within their budget red being those departments that are exceeding the thresholds they're in the top section of general fund there's one red which is sheriff there's a If you see down in general revenue, it's hard to read on this slide. But if you look at the general revenues there is a triangle, positive triangle that would indicate that is operating better than their budget. And then the rest are non-general fund or other funds, special revenue funds and you can see there as we've talked about behavioral wellness is the primary one that's in the red zone.

And so 66 out of 68 of our departments are performing above or on target. General fund variance 1.6 million, special revenue variance positive 1.8 when you roll all those departments together in both those categories. So with that I breezed through, rushed through the report but I'm happy to answer any questions your board might have.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:16:32 · ≈ 1:16 PM

Thank you very much. And the reason for that, for me was this is all pre-Thomas Fire and 1-9 debris flow information which is nice to know and we did get some good information from it but it's dated so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:16:47 · ≈ 1:16 PM

Mr. Chairman I agree and we will be back to your board either at the end of this month or early March with an update on where we see the Thomas Fire and the debris flow cost going. We'll have better intelligence by then with respect to What we might be able to receive reimbursement from FEMA and Cal OES revenues as well.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:17:09 · ≈ 1:17 PM

And I don't know if we talked about this in a board meeting or maybe this was at ledge committee, but In that, if we could also talk about I think inside the governor's budget Sonoma and maybe Napa had like property tax backfills that we're working on so. All right, CEO Miyasato you have anything you want to add

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction4:17:30 · ≈ 1:17 PM

or? Just to clarify, so I said earlier in our meeting that we expected the local share of cost be between 7 and 9 million and that was based on an estimated total cost of- 39. 39 million, so as Mr. Frapple said that's being updated now to a much larger number So our share would probably also increase and I appreciate your board letting mr. Frappe will go He has actually two o'clock meeting today with our staff to talk about this issue. I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:17:55 · ≈ 1:17 PM

hope it's not in Santa Barbara Supervisor, well, I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:17:59 · ≈ 1:17 PM

gonna call seven million was a percentage of the 30 whatever right, so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:07 · ≈ 1:18 PM

Supervisor Walther, Chair. So the original $7 million reduction is kind of made up of two components. We know that some of the costs being incurred are not eligible for reimbursement so we know those are local costs. In addition, we know that in the best case funding scenario, the local share of a reimbursable cost is about 6.3%. So that 7 million was the combination of those costs that we incurred that we don't expect to be reimbursed for and then our local share of the reimbursable costs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:18:40 · ≈ 1:18 PM

And are you comparing how you're doing your calculations with How it was done in the past for instance the T fire or that has to see the fire I don't know which I think it was a T fire. That wasn't well Are you looking at that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:56 · ≈ 1:18 PM

Supervisor Wolfe the chair we are and we're continuing to monitor their changes in FEMA and Cal OES Reimbursement rules there's a lot of change since that time and so we are working closely with those two agencies to make sure that we Cross our T's and dot our I's to maximize our reimbursement.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:19:14 · ≈ 1:19 PM

Okay, and just one final question. I met with Mr. Berg and he brought up what you talked about, Mr. Lavagnino about the reimbursement that's allocated in the governor's budget. Have we made a formal request to the governor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:19:26 · ≈ 1:19 PM

Supervisor Wolfe for the chair, we are in constant contact with CSAC. CSAC is the accumulator of those costs and so they've reached out on behalf and working with the governor's office To identify the loss of property taxes specifically, because that is what's earmarked in the Governor's January budget. He signals an intent to give relief to local counties that lost property taxes because of these disasters. So we are keeping them informed and working with the Assessor's Office and Treasury Tax Sector.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:20:03 · ≈ 1:20 PM

So we haven't yet sent a letter

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:20:04 · ≈ 1:20 PM

to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:20:04 · ≈ 1:20 PM

the governor? That's what I'm wondering.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:20:06 · ≈ 1:20 PM

I'm sorry, Supervisor, well we have sent our preliminary numbers. They know they're preliminary and will continue to update those.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:20:12 · ≈ 1:20 PM

To CSAC or to the Governor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:20:13 · ≈ 1:20 PM

CSAC. They're accumulating all of those and transmitting them to the Governor.

CommentLanguage Line SolutionsProposed · by introduction4:20:17 · ≈ 1:20 PM

Supervisor Wolf for the Chair, once we do a little more work on our numbers, we will be sending it to our entire delegation. Okay perfect, thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:20:26 · ≈ 1:20 PM

Supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:20:27 · ≈ 1:20 PM

Yeah, I'll just add that this was an item of discussion to Supervisor Wolf's question. This was an item of discussion last week with the meeting with Governor staff and Cal OES head Mr. Ghilarducci and both I and county staff presented this issue to them so they're very aware of it. It's now just going to come down to us giving a good accounting number for what that amount of loss of property tax is.

4:21 – 4:3219 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:21:08 · ≈ 1:21 PM

Okay, any other comments? I'll take a motion to receive and file. Moved and seconded. Roll call. Hi

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:21:24 · ≈ 1:21 PM

Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:21:25 · ≈ 1:21 PM

Roll call now by first name, I'm down with that. I'm

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:21:27 · ≈ 1:21 PM

sorry. I thought you wanted to say something else

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:21:35 · ≈ 1:21 PM

Mr. Adam hi, mr. Lavagnino. Hi miss wolf. Hi miss Hartman Das

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:21:45 · ≈ 1:21 PM

All right. Now, sorry I'm going to go to item number four because I've been told it's very, very quick. Sorry Mr. Chaplain. Item 4.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:22:03 · ≈ 1:22 PM

Chair Lavagnino, members of the board, item 4 is from Public Works to the Board as the Board of Directors of the Water Agency. It's a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an update on the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act implementation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:22:17 · ≈ 1:22 PM

Mr. Adam?

CommentValerie GrimaldoProposed · by introduction4:22:19 · ≈ 1:22 PM

Yes, I got it. Concerning item D4, my family and I farm and have water rights in some of the areas that may be within groundwater sustainability plans that are considered later for some of these areas. Through an abundance of caution, I therefore am recusing myself from consideration of this item today. After I have an opportunity to consult with the Fair Political Practices Commission, I might decide in the future to consider and vote on matters concerning the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. But for now, I will be recusing it. Okay.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:22:55 · ≈ 1:22 PM

And I bet you wish we would've kept this one last because then you could have left. Sorry about that, did not know that. All right,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:23:02 · ≈ 1:23 PM

Mr. Fairham? Mr Chair, members of the board, Mr Young of our office will give you a brief update and then we note that we also have an item set for the May 8th agenda and will be available for questions so I'll turn it over to Mr Young

PresenterMr YoungProposed · by introduction4:23:18 · ≈ 1:23 PM

Good afternoon. I'm here to give you an update on the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, or SGMA, and give you an update on what we're doing in participating in groundwater sustainability agencies, GSAs, in five basins throughout the county. Kiama Basin is a critically overdrafted basin with an accelerated deadline of 2020 to complete a Groundwater Sustainability Plan, or GSP. We've worked with other members of a joint powers authority created to form the GSA to complete the initial steps toward preparing a GSP. Accomplishments have included holding monthly board meetings as well as several special meetings, appointing ad hoc committees, hiring an executive director and general counsel, hiring technical consultants, establishing a stakeholder advisory committee.

The Water Agency has been represented by Supervisor Williams and 5th District Chief of Staff Corey Bantalan at meetings and on ad hoc committees. The GSA submitted an application to DWR for grant funding in support of GSP preparation, and I'm happy to share that last week we received the news that $1.6 million was awarded to the GSA which was the full amount requested.

We can now begin preparing the GSP which includes extensive public outreach and stakeholder engagement. In the San Ynez Basin, based on jurisdictional and hydrogeological differences. The agencies in the basin agreed to form three separate GSAs representing the three main areas of the basin. There's the eastern management area in green, the central management area in tan, and the western management area in blue.

Your board appointed third district supervisor Joan Hartman to sit on the GSA Board for each of the management areas. The San Angeles River Water Conservation District covers a majority of the basin and is leading Sigma implementation, and I'll mention that today Bill Bulo, the water resources manager for the district is here in case you have any additional questions.

The district has engaged with the consultant, conducted an assessment of the data gaps required to be filled to complete a GSP and submitted an application for grant funding to DWR. In this basin also, the full requested grant amount was awarded for a total of $1 million. Now that grant funding has been awarded to each management area, we'll begin holding GSA meetings, conducting public outreach and forming advisory committees. The Water Agency has budgeted funds to support hydrogeological investigations in the Eastern Management Area. We are beginning the procurement process for consultant to conduct these investigations and will bring a contract to your board for review and approval.

In the San Antonio Creek Valley, the GSA is composed of the Kachuma Resource Conservation District and the Los Alamos Community Services District. The coloring on this slide does not appear to work on this screen but it is in the middle there. The GSA has established a regular meeting schedule, submitted a grant application to DWR and solicited applications for an advisory committee. The water agency in Vandenberg Air Force Base will sit on the advisory committee with additional members to be drawn from interested members of the community.

We continue to work with USGS on the San Antonio Basin Groundwater Availability Study which was conceived prior to SGMA but will provide a basis for preparation of the GSP. This GSA also was awarded grant funding to a tune of $300,000. Finally, there are two fringe areas in the county. Basins that have previously been adjudicated but are not subject to the full requirements of SGMA. However, in the Santa Maria and Goleta groundwater basins, the boundary of the adjudication does not completely match with the basin boundary as defined in DWR's Bolton 118 leaving fringe areas which are not managed pursuant to the adjudication.

You can see on this map in the Santa Maria area, the light blue shows the fringe areas in Santa Barbara County. Your board formed GSAs over these fringe areas in 2017. Water agency staff have been in frequent communication with representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board and DWR regarding options to avoid preparing a full GSP, including relying on existing reports provided by the agencies managing the adjudicated portions of the basins.

State staff have been encouraging about the potential for alternative reporting requirements, but have been unwilling to commit to anything formal today. Water agency staff have also participated in an informal working group of counties, water agencies and water masters who are working together to solve these fringe area problems. In Santa Maria Basin, there are small areas on the eastern edge of the adjudicated basin with very limited groundwater use or agricultural production.

These areas include a portion of the Kiyama River Valley from Twitchell Reservoir to the adjudicated basin, an area along Tepeskaya Creek and a short reach of the Sisquack River. Larger fringe areas are located in the county of San Luis Obispo. The Water Agency has been working closely with the County of San Luis Obispo and local landowners to better understand local geology and water use in these areas.

We are planning on submitting a request for a basin boundary modification to eliminate some or all of the fringe areas from DWR's definition of the basin and from the requirements of SGMA. The first step in the process is to submit an initial notification to DWR that the water agency is considering a basin boundary modification. Once the initial notification is submitted, water agency staff will prepare technical information supporting the modification. Hold a public meeting with stakeholders in the fringe areas and coordinate with the county of San Luis Obispo which also intends to submit a basin boundary modification request.

We will bring the proposed modification request to your board on March 8th ahead of DWR's June 30th deadline. The proposed boundary modification may not be successful over the entire fringe area, and staff will continue to work with the state agencies on a solution to avoid or minimize GSP preparation. The Goleta Fringe areas are primarily located north of Cathedral Oaks Road and include larger areas west of the Goleta City limits and along San Antonio Creek north and east of Tucker's Grove County Park.

When the board met to form the GSA in August of 2017, the City of Goleta sent a letter indicating it had not yet taken a position on whether or not to join the GSA formation. The board directed staff to continue to discuss GSA participation with the city of Goleta within 90 day timeline for decision to be made. After several discussions between water agency and city of Goleta staff, the Goleta City Council voted on January 16th of this year not to participate in the GSA.

Based on the preliminary review of basin geology, a basin boundary revision to remove some of these areas from the basin is unlikely to be successful. We will continue to work with the state agencies on a solution to avoid or minimize GSP preparation. In summary, staff recommends that your board receive and file this report. Direct staff to submit an initial notification to DWR for a basin boundary modification in the Santa Maria fringe area. Set a hearing for May 8th 2018 to consider basin boundary modification for the Santa Maria fringe area and determine this is not a project pursuant to CEQA. Happy to answer any questions you may have.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:30:21 · ≈ 1:30 PM

Thank you very much. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.854:30:23 · ≈ 1:30 PM

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Question about advisory committees. What are the qualifications and could you describe the process? And is it different across different basins or whatever you can do to tell me more about them?

PresenterMr YoungProposed · by introduction4:30:35 · ≈ 1:30 PM

Of course, Supervisor Hartman through the chair. It is different in different basins. It's up to the GSA board of each basin to determine qualifications. For example, in the Kiyama Basin an ad hoc committee of the board was formed to come up with some qualifications. They included living or working in the basin, desire to have broad geographic and land use representation.

And then an application process was performed. Applications were reviewed, and out of I believe 11 applications seven stakeholders were chosen again for the broadest possible representation to represent the basin. In other basins, for example San Antonio, They had a similar application process. Again, they're looking for broad representation in addition to the agency seats for the Santa Barbara County Water Agency and Vandenberg.

For the fringe areas we're just getting started and I think we will probably wait on doing advisory committees until we've found out what basin boundary modifications are going to look like. And in San Ynez, again we're looking for broad representation. We've identified stakeholders throughout the areas and we will likely be pursuing an application process shortly.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.854:32:00 · ≈ 1:32 PM

If I might add, this is a new statute. It's a huge amount of work and I can't believe that you've gotten all the money from the grants and how you've just been chugging along and getting it all done. And I think that's a real testament to the professionalism of our staff. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:32:22 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Outstanding. Any other comments from the board? All right. I will entertain a motion. Oh, is there any public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:32:29 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Are we no request to speak? Okay, great.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:32:33 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Entertain a motion to believe receive and file the report.

4:32 – 4:559 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:32:41 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:32:42 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Roll call please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:32:44 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Mr. Adams is recused in not participating. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Ms. Wolfe? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye Mr Williams? Aye Four ayes with one abstention

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:32:56 · ≈ 1:32 PM

All right, save the best for last. Yay! All right item number three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:33:07 · ≈ 1:33 PM

Item number three this is from community services it's a hearing to consider recommendations running arts and economic development in Santa Barbara County

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:33:16 · ≈ 1:33 PM

Good afternoon board members. George Chapchin, Director of Community Services Department and with me is Sarah York Rubin who is our Executive Director for the Arts and we thought we'd bring you some good news about the arts more quantifiable about the impact the arts have on our local community in local economy We are part of an arts and economic prosperity study that's done nationally and regionally.

So I want Sarah to go through this, and we'll take any questions you have after the presentation or during the presentation. Sarah? And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:33:48 · ≈ 1:33 PM

I'm going to move up to my turn. Yeah, they'll- Yeah, move over

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:33:53 · ≈ 1:33 PM

here. And with our wonderful Arts and

CommentNathan NunezProposed · by introduction4:33:55 · ≈ 1:33 PM

Culture staff person, Hannah Rubel-Cava. Thank you, thank you George. Good afternoon members of the board I'm Sarah York Rubin here with the Microphone, also essential for the arts. Here with the County Office of Arts and Culture. And today I'm sharing the results of our Arts and Economic Prosperity Study which we released here in Santa Maria as well as in Santa Barbara at our art symposia in November 2017. The full report is included for your reference in a packet you received for today's meeting.

Per the study in our county, nonprofits arts and cultural organizations generate over a $200 million revenue stream. These persuasive numbers help to reframe the art's incredible impact through the money they contribute directly to our local economy. I will also include a current state of the arts right now in Santa Barbara County. This presentation will highlight the business of art, including arts and cultural nonprofits compelling economic force as a creative industry. Their unique capacity to drive local spending and the economic upside of hosting both arts organizations and artists as local residents.

The Office of Arts and Culture serves under the Community Services Department as the county's arts and culture division. We are also employed by contract with the city of Santa Barbara, and we serve as a state-local partner for the State of California. Santa Barbara County is a leader in the arts, and our office is a best practices model of maximizing city, county, and statewide resources.

Some of our responsibilities include administering four grants programs to help support our local arts and culture organizations and artists. Maintaining the city and county art collections and public art, and curating four indoor galleries as well as two outdoor galleries. Also for over 40 years we have proudly provided staff support for the Santa Barbara County Arts Commission which will celebrate its 40th anniversary this March and we hope you can join us.

We also provide staff support for the City of Santa Barbara Arts Advisory Committee and Events and Festivals Committee. Another one of our functions is to be a regional cultural development agency. In this capacity, we help coordinate studies such as the Americans for the Arts, Arts and Economic Prosperity Five. Research like this can help demonstrate the strength of Santa Barbara County's arts community, identify any opportunities to grow the industry, and help our county's art organizations leverage the information to receive financial support.

So this year's study results are in and Santa Barbara County sets a national precedent and standard as an arts destination. So Santa Barbara County has partnered with Americans for the Arts for the past 20 years to assess the economic impact of our non-profit creative sector through the Arts and Economic Prosperity Study. This marks the fifth time that our county has administered and implemented this study, this being we are one of 341 participating regions right now for the last study.

The Arts and Economic Prosperity Methodology was vetted by the White House Council of Economic Advisors, and the study models used to receive two Nobel Prizes in economics. More information about the methodology is attached to the reports provided with your board letters. The bottom line is that our non-profit arts and culture organizations contribute a lot of money to our local economy. Per this study $200 million from the 93 organizations sampled.

This information represents the monetary contribution of these 93, but you can imagine how much larger that $200 million sum would be if we were to add in the remainder of all arts non-profits and the for profit arts industry. So this study represents a two pronged approach to arts economic impact. The first would be organizational spending and the second is audience spending. Both offer insight into the arts impact as an industry, not as a charity but rather as an economic driver in Santa Barbara County.

So arts and cultural organizations are strongly rooted in their communities. So these are jobs that necessarily remain local and cannot be outsourced, even in a global economy. Arts organizations remain local employers and create local jobs. We're looking at five times the national average when we're looking at the arts jobs, the 5,857 number here from big cities to small towns. The theater is up there with the bank and the post office. Is one of the oldest buildings on every main street. Santa Barbara's historic theater district is a business juggernaut in Santa Barbara, the museums of art and contemporary are steadfast anchors on State Street. Each institution has remained in the same location since its inception employing local people.

Often, our arts museums are strongly tied to a place. Think of the Lompoc Valley Historical Museum, Rancho La Patera and Storehouse or Lotus Land. Think about strolling the grounds of our historic missions. In many ways, the art they offer is the experience of this site itself. Arts are not suffering from the same economic hardships that the retail industry battles because with art you can never buy the same product virtually. Even with changes in technology and access, we are still able to retain arts business and keep arts jobs local.

So the operations and activities of the 93 nonprofit organizations in a sample set resulted in nearly $20 million in tax revenue for our state and local governments. The makeup of these tax dollars exemplifies the diversity of activities undertaken by arts organizations that generate government revenue. We are looking at income, sales, lodging, real estate, personal property and special use taxes. Revenue sources to the government from the arts also include licensing, utility and filing fees and special event permits.

Remember that arts organizations pay real estate utility taxes on their properties as well. The 20 million figure would grow substantially if we were to include the tax revenue generated by the many nonprofit and for-profit arts and cultural organizations, and individual artists outside of this study sample. It would also grow if we looked at the sample nonprofits' employees themselves and the taxes they paid.

As long as the county cash registers ring because of our arts and cultural community and its many patrons, no government jurisdictions, school or other special district will be left out of the impressive revenue benefits. So let's take a look at the Pacific Conservatory of Performing Arts, just down the street. Their president Mark Buer was here today but he went into dress rehearsal for their play right now The Crucible.

They were very gracious and shared their information for this presentation. And I wanted to start out with that theater is good business. So I'm not sure if you're aware of this but PCPA has an annual operating budget of approximately $4.2 million. Almost all of that budget is invested locally. So what are they spending the money on? Materials and staff. Regarding the materials, the production expenses for each PCPA stage set is almost that of building a new house. Multiply that by several productions per year, per space as they have sets both here in Santa Barbara at Allan Hancock College and also at the Theater Fest in Solvang.

They have standing accounts at local hardware stores and one of their major line items is steel that they buy here in Santa Maria. They're also a local employer. So they currently employ 49 full-time, they have 49 full time staff members and 11 part time staff members. Staff pay and even student scholarships are reinvested into our local economy through living expenses.

Audience members attending PCPA plays at the theater fest are estimated to contribute nearly $850,000 to the local economy. And audience members in Santa Maria are estimated to contribute a million dollars to the local economy here. PCPA conservatively estimates that the total economic impact directly related to their work in these local economies to be approximately 5.9 million dollars annually.

So what's the economic impact of the organizational spending that I've been talking about? When we think of arts jobs, it's easy to consider who we pay to see on stage. And it's even easier to forget to think beyond our headliners. For instance my family bought tickets to see The Nutcracker by the State Street Ballet at the Arlington Theater over the holidays. The first thing we think of are the ballerinas or The Nutcracker.

But as audience members, what we forget to consider are the electricians that rig the lights. The box office staff, the custodial crew, the people who book the show, the people who manage the finances for the production, people who book the hotel rooms, the caterers and the cycle continues. There is a backstage to the backstage. Programs are a great example of that because before a program is ever put into somebody's hand or my hand at the theater, there's a copy editor. There's a graphic designer. There's a writer. There are people who are advertising in our program.

They're a whole myriad of ways that the printing and delivery invests into our local economy just to produce the pamphlet that's handed out. Nationally, non-profit arts and cultural organizations spent an estimated $63.8 billion in 2015. And that's a myth buster for a lot of people All right, the economic impact of the audience spending. So there's often a misconception that nonprofits take but don't give back and what this study shows us is that beyond their public benefit, there's also significant economic return as a result of nonprofit arts and culture activities. Arch funding to nonprofits is not a one way street but an investment with an incredibly high yield.

The federal government receives an estimated $27.5 billion in revenue every year as a result of the economic activity of non-profit arts organizations and their audiences, and this is a great return for the Fed considering that they're investing about five billion dollars a year. This past week, my husband and I have been attending the Santa Barbara International Film Festival.

Last Saturday we went to the Arlington Theater to see the actors speak. In addition to the cost of tickets, we paid for parking in the Granada Garage, dinner at Smyth where the summer set was. I bought myself a new dress. When we got there, we ordered two glasses of Ganey wine and that's all before we went into the theater itself. People at the event with us were coming from hotels nearby. Some lived in LA, some as far away as Japan.

They're providing heads and beds taxes every night and the festival ran for a week and over two weekends. So like all art industries, spending by arts and culture organizations has a measurable economic impact. Unlike most industries, the arts generate additional local event related spending. And these dollars land in the pockets of our local businesses, our parking garages, restaurants, retail stores, hotels and even local babysitters. Just think about Valentine's Day tomorrow and all of the date-related spending that will be associated with tickets to see a concert or a movie or theater.

So in Santa Barbara County, people are going to arts events. 2.6 million people to be exact. Looking at a previous example, PCPA, we know that they attract tourists. They present in both Solvang and Santa Maria and their total attendance last season was around 70,000 people. But the more important statistic is that around 50% of their unique ticket buyers were from outside of Santa Barbara County. That means that we're pulling in tourists from other counties and other places around the world.

19.8% were Southern California county households, and 30% were outside of California entirely. Another reason for the 2.6 million people is our festivals. Santa Barbara County's beautiful weather means that we can host outdoor events year-round to utilize our public spaces, from Fiesta to the rodeo to the Earl Warren Showground. Lucidity Festival at the Live Oak Campground literally pays rental costs to the county.

Santa Barbara is a leader in its attraction of large numbers of out-of-towners to its arts attractions. At the national level, policy experts look to us to see what we're doing right to keep people coming. So the data from AAP shows that our visitors are spending money $51 and 88 cents per person which is twice what our locals are spending. When asked for the reason for their trip 69% of non local attendees responded the arts event was the primary purpose.

Nationally, 14% of attendees report an overnight lodging expense averaging almost $170 per person which is conservative for the county. The study also proved that arts keep locals and their money in the community because our locals said that they would have traveled to a different community to see the same arts event. So the vibrant arts community is great for local business and also the tourism industry.

And again, $72 million. Our arts audiences are spending money and this is particularly relevant to tourism where the money comes from out of town and stays here. Beyond the nonprofit sector, arts and cultures comprise a major percentage of the businesses in our city and county. We shouldn't forget concert venues, film shoots, independent artists, musicians in galleries. I also hope that we're able to expand our thinking about arts and culture to include our chefs, our culinary artists, our vintners, and our special local Santa Barbara cultures including for instance our surf culture. Statewide, this is a major reality as well from Michelin and James Beard Award winning culinary geniuses to Hollywood in the academy rock and roll musicians. Arts define who we are as Californians and on a global scale.

So per the study joint commission by the National Endowment for the Arts and the Center for Cultural Innovation in 2016, Santa Barbara ranks ninth per capita in working artists. So that's 9th out of 367. Our density of artists is incredible and that's part of what helps us to become such a successful attraction. That we have so many working artist means that our artists are working. Looking holistically at our nonprofit sector, it generates 8.4% of Santa Barbara County's GDP representing the highest rate in Southern California.

So the creative economy that I've talked a little bit about today is identified through three major components. This map geocaches the first two, businesses and individuals involved in producing cultural artistic and design goods and services, and organizations that provide venues to share with the public such as concert halls, museums, art galleries, and theaters.

Finally, the creative economy includes the support system that teaches, nurtures and sustains creativity while still providing local jobs such as our teachers, post-secondary arts institutions, philanthropic foundations and other nonprofit organizations that provide services and incentives for the arts. Looking at civic engagement, we captured the information from almost 7,000 volunteers donating 327,000 hours last year in Santa Barbara County. That's a lot of volunteers and a lot of happy people who are engaged civically which is really significant.

I did want to bring to everyone's attention that the arts have been impacted by the disasters too, but that they've really pitched in and helped. MOXIE or the Wolf Museum of Exploration and Innovation and the Santa Barbara Zoo became portable classrooms for the displaced schools in Montecito. Almost all of the museums open their doors to offer free admission to our residents who were displaced from the fire and the mudslides. So that the families would have a place to go while they were out of school, and while they were living remotely or in a hotel room or borrowed room. We also wanted to inform the board that the office is actively seeking disaster relief assistance for the county's non-profit arts and culture organizations.

So we aggregated, reached out to 136 nonprofit arts and culture organizations around the county. And 62 reported losses totaling $3.6 million. So of those 62, we sent an extrapolation requesting a provision of $10 million from the National Endowment for the Arts. To support the studied spaces including destroyed and damaged spaces, cost of disaster related extraordinary activities. Lost revenue in disrupted year end fundraising campaigns.

Even in these lean times the arts are here for us and one another to make our community a safe healing and inclusive place to be. And it's also worth noting that our keynote speaker at this symposium was Mayor Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans. Who is here to talk about how arts and culture helped to lead the charge in New Orleans post Hurricane Katrina. Behind the arts and culture itself, arts have a social impact that can't be denied.

University of Pennsylvania researches have demonstrated that high concentration of the arts in a city leads to higher civic engagement, more social cohesion. Higher child welfare and lower poverty rates, arts improve health care. Nearly one half of the nation's healthcare institutions provide arts programming. The arts also help to heal the mental, physical and moral injuries of our military service members and veterans who rank the creative arts therapies in the top four out of 40 interventions and treatments generally provided.

Regarding education, arts are a biggie. They foster 21st century work skills like creativity, critical thinking and collaboration. One in ten jobs for graduates will be in the creative sector and analysis of the U.S. Department of Education data by UCLA Found that students highly involved in the arts perform better in a variety of academic measures than other students. So their grade point averages, standardized test scores, they had lower dropout rates, better attitudes about community service. And these findings also held when studied across socioeconomic strata suggesting that arts can help level the playing field for students from disadvantaged circumstances and send all of our kids out there better equipped to excel in life.

So in California, there are 747,600 direct creative jobs. So the creative sector accounts for about 5.4% of all wage and salary employment. It's 10.9% of our state's GDP and we lead the nation. We're double New York and more than four times Texas which are the next highest states that are looking at creative generation. Nationally, 673 out of 656 businesses are involved in the creation or distribution of the arts and they employ 3.48 million people.

On a federal level, because of the significant rising percentage of arts monies contributing to the economy. The US Bureau of Economic Analysis established an Arts and Culture Production Satellite account which takes into account the full breadth of the nation's arts and culture industries not just in non-profit sector like I talked about today but The commercial and entertainment sectors, Broadway, the motion picture industry, individual artists, architecture and design. And according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The arts were a $450 billion industry. A $730 billion industry in 2014, which represents 4.2% of our nation's GDP. We've exported more arts and cultural goods and services than imported since 2006. In 2013 netting a $24.1 billion trade surplus, so we've outperformed the overall US state balance of trade increasing surplus tenfold. Consumers annually spend nearly $150 billion on entertainment and the arts. So the tiniest investment here reaps significant rewards.

Bottom line, arts organizations are small businesses. They're members of our chambers of commerce, downtown orgs, small business councils and groups. We're dense for freelancers and individual artists, professional artists in schools. Hopefully the results from this study change the conversation from the arts as a charity to the arts is a local industry and investment providing not only cultural investments but driving our local economy.

And just we are really proud to know that the arts in Santa Barbara punch way above their weight class. We should be extremely proud that a population of our size produces these world-class institutions, museums, artists and cultural opportunities. The $200 million in activity and 20 million tax revenue paint a pretty powerful portrait. Thank you for your time today. We appreciate it and appreciate having an opportunity for arts to speak out at the table about everything that's happening with our wonderful artistic constituents in the county.

4:55 – 4:5814 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:55:47 · ≈ 1:55 PM

Very good, very informative. Do we have any public speakers Mr. Allen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:55:52 · ≈ 1:55 PM

No requests.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:55:53 · ≈ 1:55 PM

All right, any comments from the board?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:55:56 · ≈ 1:55 PM

I will say it was a long presentation, but it was really interesting. And thank you for putting it all together and for all of your work and really covering the entire county. And I thought that was really interesting also seeing the photographs and you did a good job. You entertained us.

CommentNathan NunezProposed · by introduction4:56:16 · ≈ 1:56 PM

Thank you

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:56:16 · ≈ 1:56 PM

Supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:56:21 · ≈ 1:56 PM

I just appreciated seeing some of those numbers. I always hoped and believed that was the impact that we're making in the arts, but it helps to see that and document it so thank you. And Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.854:56:38 · ≈ 1:56 PM

Thank you. I just wanted to say, I thought this was absolutely amazing and especially to learn that Santa Barbara County really is so much above its weight that the arts are really important here and I want to express my appreciation because You have been throughout the county working with arts communities and helping identify. I know the new mural in Guadalupe, and we've got a wonderful art exhibit at Lake Kachuma. And you've really helped to catalyze the arts community, and I think that's what investing in your office has resulted in.

There's a quote that I think you've just disproved, that you can't make a living in art but art makes life worth living. And it really is. It's one of those amenities that bring people together and interpret what life is all about, and creates those opportunities. So thank you for all of this. Gives me a lot to chew on. All right, thank you Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:57:38 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Very good. All right can I get a motion to receive and file please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:57:42 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Second.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:57:44 · ≈ 1:57 PM

All right roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:57:47 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr. Lavinino? Aye. Ms. Wolfe? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:57:54 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Aye

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.834:57:55 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Alright, I think that concludes our meeting and we will adjourn until our next meeting which won't be until February 27th back in Santa Barbara