BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 17, 2019

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:042 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:02 · ≈ 9:00 AM

. . . .

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:25 · ≈ 9:02 AM

Thank you. Thank you. Good morning. I'd like to call this meeting of the To order of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, second day of our budget workshops. Madam Clerk can I get a roll call please?

0:04 – 0:1018 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:04 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Ms. Hartman? Here. Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:09 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:09 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr Williams? Here Mr Hart?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.874:12 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Here

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:12 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr Lavinino?

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈25s recited, not transcribed
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.874:13 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Here Please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance Ready begin

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.874:39 · ≈ 9:04 AM

All right, this is our time set aside for public comment. These are for comments that aren't not on subjects that are not on today's agenda. Madam Clerk do we have any requests to speak?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:51 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Chair Lavinino and members of the board we have two requests to speak on general public comment today and we're going to begin with Andy Caldwell to be followed by Ed Kolaski.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:01 · ≈ 9:05 AM

And we have a third up here from Renee O'Neill Okay,

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:04 · ≈ 9:05 AM

thank you. Chairman Lavinino, members of the board, Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. CEO Mia Sato took a look back in the budget and inspired us to do the same. And as I mentioned the other day, CoLab has been around for 28 years now and back in 1992 was the first budget hearings we went to And back then, the average county employee was making roughly the same as the average private sector worker.

When you fast forward to today, the average county employee is now making as much as the average two parent working family in the county. In fact they're making more. And I wanted to just highlight a little bit about what happened. Back in 92, the county budget was $344 million a year. As you now know it's 1.1 billion. The average county salary is around $25,000. The population back then was 369,000 people.

So roughly 70,000 more people between then and now. 70,000 more people. Back then the budget for mental health was $11 million. Today it's $142 million. More than a 10-time increase. Sheriff was $19.4 million. Today it's $154 million. County Fire was $16 million. Today it's 85 million. Public health had a budget of $25 million. The budget today is 94. So you're seeing percentages increase of 400, 500 or 600% when the population growth was more like 25%.

And what happened in the private sector and here's the key point? Back then in 92 the median family income was $50,000. Today the average household income is 67,000 so while county government went up 300 400 and 500 percent The income of the people paying the bills Went up 30% And I believe our elected officials have lost perspective over that time frame of what has happened with the private sector incomes versus the cost of government. There's inordinate growth in the size of government relative to the population and relative to the ability of the people to pay for it based on their own income, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:17 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Our next speaker is Ed Kolaski, and then we will go to Santa Maria for Rene O'Neill.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:27 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Before you go ahead, I'm just gonna make a rare editorial comment because I always love that Andy brings up some important issues. And

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:35 · ≈ 9:08 AM

this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:35 · ≈ 9:08 AM

is why

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:35 · ≈ 9:08 AM

we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:35 · ≈ 9:08 AM

got done at three o'clock? Yeah. Okay,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:37 · ≈ 9:08 AM

all right as opposed to...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:39 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Go ahead. I think those stats are pretty important but to me the most important is that Median household income between 1992 and 2018 only rose 30% I mean the economy in the state has grown commensurate with The county budget. That's why the county budget is what it is to some extent but Even in household income has not. People are struggling and to me the real problem is that, but thank you for bringing up those stats.

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.839:23 · ≈ 9:09 AM

Well, I got to join in. And I read your column this morning as I always do and so I was ready for it. I think part of the problem isn't that the county budget has grown but that the income of people families has not So at the Fortune 500 companies, the executives make 300 times the median salary. At average American companies it's 70 times the average median salary and so private sector companies are no longer paying the benefits in insurance and so then that spills over to the public-at-large i.e., government. So maybe the problems are deeper than county government. Maybe it goes to our economy as a whole

0:10 – 0:1710 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8710:06 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Okay we'll go to our next public speaker, Mr. Klaski.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed10:10 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Thank you and I enjoyed his talk very good which will bring up a comment right now I call this the I bear the scars of the troika of corruption that is with Janet Wolfe and Alex Pujo and Anne Almy. Now Janet Wolfe and Anne Almy have retired so I'm left with Alex Pujo You know, I go through so many things with him between laughing at me when I show up there and limiting my talks to two minutes instead of three minutes, turning off the microphone saying that's okay. And the most thing in the past which has really irritated me for the last five years Is that he kicked us out of the meeting in 15 seconds, wouldn't even let us show our drawings. We went through four meetings and he said do this, do that, we did this, do that. Fifth meeting all of a sudden they want the second story not located solely over the garage.

So fine, we moved it. We expanded it just like they wanted. And you know it's a hardship when you've got to consider you're taking a small project and almost doubling it. Adding 300 square feet to 400 square foot project. So we paused, had extra time to present our case. We come in and Alex won't even let us show the drawings. Apparently he showed the old drawings to the other six members.

I mean, you talk about there's seven members down there and somebody should be able to vote for you or do something. Well if you can't show your drawing what good is it? You can have 50 members. It doesn't really matter. And there was one meeting where after I gave my talk I'm sitting back on one of the end seats and a guard comes up to me and I didn't even realize that I was looking down at the time He says, you have to leave.

I said why? Because somebody doesn't want you here and he proceeded to start getting his nightstick out and I'm over there trying to get my books and papers together as fast as I can for fear that I come just am I gonna hit fear they you know I'm waiting for the hit on the back of my head well at least that got everybody upset that was there or at least most people And we got a meeting out of that. That was great.

Go into a special meeting and basically say, Ed, do whatever you want, change something and we'll approve it. Wow! That sounds great. And then I go to Ann Almey afterwards and she said no that isn't true. The only thing we'll accept is if you take your second story and put it solely over the living room, in which case you'll have a view of your neighbor's yards on both sides. And I told her from day one, we did not want our second story located solely over the living room looking at our neighbors' yards.

She said, Ed, don't worry after awhile you'll stop looking at your neighbors' yards. Yeah Ann, but will my neighbors know that? Thank you. There's 15 reasons why Alex should have been prosecuted.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed13:30 · ≈ 9:13 AM

And our final speaker, we will go to Santa Maria for Renee O'Neill

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed13:37 · ≈ 9:13 AM

Good morning, my friends. Chair Lavinino, supervisors, it's always good to be up here before you. I had wanted to participate in these budget hearings the whole entire time but have other things that have popped up and may have to leave early today as well. But I did want to just on my cannabis issue, Not having heard what's happening with the sheriffs and things like that today. I'm just speaking to encourage the board in regard to the behavioral health or wellness meeting I attended, and anything having to do with The sheriff's in support of programs, staff.

Hiring the number of people that we need during this crisis with the out-of-control cannabis issue. Supervisor Hartman, the other day you mentioned that 86% of the growers in our county are illegal. It was a, I believe it was at the hoops meeting you mentioned that. And if that's the case, it speaks to the importance of not only getting the staff in place that we need to process these applications properly, the affidavits, the growers that claim legal non-conforming that are truly not. I believe if I'm correct, Person at Planning and Development that oversees the entire application process, and is expected to review and verify the applicant's information as being true or not. So that's I believe the biggest Area we need to staff immediately, that empowers the county and the sheriffs therefore to once P&D reviews applications can identify more quickly who is a legitimate player and who is not.

With the behavioral wellness meeting I attended and the issues that are now cropping up, no pun intended regarding cannabis and health issues. And psychosomatic issues and other things because of the high concentration of THC which has tripled in toxicity since I was a kid in the 60's 70's. We don't know enough about this because it's been a federally regulated drug, class one drug. And so there hasn't been the funding to really research this issue and there's going to be more demand on our behavioral health system in regard to the numbers of people that are going to be putting demands on that. Thank you so much for putting up with me always.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed16:49 · ≈ 9:16 AM

And that was our final speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed16:50 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8316:51 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Thank you, I don't remember saying any statistic about the percentage of unlawful grows in our county. I don't think anyone knows that number and I'd just like to correct the record if there is something we went back and couldn't find a statement to that effect so just wanted to make sure I corrected that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8717:13 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Okay all right so I think do we have any other requests to speak from the public?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed17:17 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Chair Lavagnino, members of the board that was our final speaker.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8717:20 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Okay we will now move into our departmental budgets and we'll lead off with the Office of the Sheriff

0:17 – 0:291 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed17:45 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Well, good morning Chair Lavendino, members of the board. It really truly is a pleasure to be in front of you to present a budget that for the first time in a long time doesn't have any anticipated service level reductions. We have developed and we are presenting to you today a budget with no cuts to positions or service level reductions but which nevertheless is very tight and which leaves little to no room for unanticipated expenses.

And as has been said before, there really is no stretch left in our budget rubber band. No cushion left to soften the blow of unexpected fiscal obligations. Our staffing remains at minimum levels in patrol, criminal and narcotic investigations, dispatch, administration and most support positions. We have a temporary overstaffing situation in our main jail as a result of the hiring and training of extra staff Who will be needed to open the Northern Branch Jail later this year.

But that will come to an end with the opening of that facility, and our key challenges and emerging issues are still some that have been with us in the past and some which are new. We're still struggling with staffing. Our staffing is inadequate in several different areas as I mentioned. Despite this, we have reduced overtime. We have budgeted what we need to operate in a manner that still provides excellent public safety service and I'm very proud of the service delivery that has been provided to the community in spite of the fact Very limited human resources in certain areas.

Concerns moving forward, particularly as a result of the impact of the Northern Branch Jail, not the jail itself which will be adequately staffed but in terms of the impact that it will have on main jail operations once the staff from the main jail move to the Northern Branch Jail is a major concern. As you're aware we have A study going on in place by Vanner to look at the refurbishing and remodeling of the main jail.

And along with that, we need to really take a look at the staffing study which was conducted by CGL. It really needs to be freshened up and I would submit that that's something this board should consider authorizing. The CEO to do. But it is a problem that is going to have to be addressed we were short staffed in the jail and that problem has been temporarily solved now as a result of the Northern Branch Jail anticipated hiring and staffing people but it is is going to present itself once again when the new jail opens speaking of the Northern Branch Jail This project, which is the largest public works construction project in the county's history remains a challenge in some ways. But we are getting there and contractors have projected substantial completion by October 13th.

We are anticipating about a 90 day period of shakedown and training and preparation and getting that jail ready to open and are anticipating that we will actually have The opening of that facility early in the new year. We are excited about this long anticipated and long needed asset that's about to become an operational reality, and there is a buzz about that in the sheriff's office, and we're very appreciative of it.

As I mentioned, it is going to have impacts on our main jail. In addition to the pending staffing challenges, there's a need for significant refurbishment and repurposing of that facility. The facility is 50 plus years old and the design is antiquated and it is inefficient. And one of our expansion requests is to consolidate the four existing control rooms that just sort of developed as a result of the expansions over the years in that facility into one central control center.

That would provide better security for the main jail, but it would also reduce our staffing needs in terms of staffing those control centers. This is just one element of the renovation that's required for the main jail. Plans are also in development for other required modifications, including Americans with Disability Act modifications, seismic upgrades, the creation of a centralized medical and mental health clinic.

And housing unit and to make security upgrades to modify housing units, to address classroom and program space needs. And to make necessary repairs that are required because of the facility's age. The plans in the cost estimates are still under development and from a budget standpoint this item is currently under review. Challenges in the area of mental health.

As you are aware and as you heard on Monday, we're making some very good progress in this arena in collaboration with behavioral wellness and with a variety of other stakeholders that include county agencies and nonprofit organizations that advocate for and represent mentally ill people. We have started in the sheriff's office, the behavioral science unit. We've hired Dr. Sherilyn Lee, our psychologist that is doing a terrific job.

Coordinating our response to mental health issues. We have developed in conjunction with behavioral wellness and are participating in the co-response pilot project, which you're aware of and which is doing just a superb job out in the community and as well received. The training that we have given to our sworn staff, all of our sworn staff in crisis intervention training has been superb and is continuing and is in the process of expanding.

We have worked with the Department of State Hospitals and are currently engaged in discussions with them about developing a jail-based competency Treatment program in our jail under a contract with the state hospitals and in conjunction with our service providers. We are involved in and I've taken the lead in the stepping up initiative to bring together A variety of stakeholders in our county to have a cohesive approach to keeping mentally ill people out of the criminal justice system, to the extent that we can and to providing better care and treatment for those who must stay in our system.

We are about to begin a formal program of medication assisted treatment in our jail facility. And we are seeking multiple grants to assist us in this and other areas. And then lastly, it's still my pleasure to serve on the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission as a commissioner representing our state's sheriffs to keep mental health clients out of the criminal justice system.

Another challenge area that we have is staying current with technology. We have a strong need for improvements in evolving technology. Our records management system is 14 years old, it was last upgraded eight years ago. It is obsolete and it's no longer supported by the manufacturer. It's becoming more and more difficult to remain federal criminal justice information system and Department of Justice compliant.

And that is something that needs an upgrade. Our ability to extract and analyze data is still hampered. In addition to technology shortcomings, we continue to struggle with an inadequate staff to manage our considerable data that is generated as a result of Sheriff's Office contacts, as a result of the jail, requirements that we have in terms of keeping and managing our data. The problem is exasperated by an increasing number of Public Records Act requests which are very, very difficult to handle and very time consuming.

And also a number of legislative mandates such as the implementation of the RIPA, the Racial Identity Profiling Act of 2015 that will impact us beginning in 2022 and will require us Capture and report, analyze and report additional data. So once again in this budget we're asking you as a expansion for a data analyst position that is critically needed. Another challenge that we have dealt with is the entire issue of cannabis, legalized cannabis. We've had a sea change in this area as a result of changes in the law.

And related policies that have been adopted by the board. Our role is to assist in the regulation of legalized cannabis businesses and to suppress the illicit market so that the legal market can succeed. Our Cannabis Compliance Team has already done a terrific job in this area, and I am confident that they will continue to do so in the future. Another challenge that we face, and we're not alone in facing is the opioid crisis. This is a national epidemic that has continued to impact our county in a very sad and very tragic way.

From 2013 to 2017, we had 307 opioid related deaths in our county. And that number has been increasing over the last several years. In response to this insidious program, we have trained and equipped our deputies to administer naloxone in the field and in the jail prior to the arrival of emergency medical services in cases of opioid overdoses. And since we began this program in 2017, we have documented 18 lives that were saved as a result of the administration of naloxone.

We are developing a medication-assisted treatment program, as I mentioned in the jail. And we will continue to provide the Sheriff's Treatment Program for inmates who struggle with the scourge of addiction and substance abuse. Another challenge that we had to deal with in the last year, as all county departments did was the debris flow. And we continue to be affected by that terrible event It has resulted however in some very good things.

The refinement of our evacuation protocols and procedures, we had three actual evacuations in advance of major storms this year alone and all of them went very smoothly and the response from the community was very positive. We also developed and implemented security plans for the evacuated areas This year alone, we provided 2906 hours of non-reimbursed overtime that were related to the evacuations.

We also expended considerable staff time gathering data in response to the Southern California Edison lawsuit and the countersuit. So that gives you a tee up of some of the challenges and issues that we're facing. And now I would like to turn it over to our under Sheriff Saul Lindver and our Chief Financial Officer, Hope Vasquez who will take you through some of the nuts and bolts of our budget.

And then I will return to wrap things up and be available for any questions you might have. Thank you

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:30 – 0:4833 turns

GuestChief Financial Officer HopeSheriffProposedself-stated30:02 · ≈ 9:30 AM

Good morning, Chair Lavendino and Supervisors. I'm Chief Financial Officer Hope Baskets and I'm going to go over a few summary slides that give a general overview for the Sheriff's budget. This slide summarizes our proposed budget for fiscal year 19-20. It documents an increase of about $9 million in operating costs from the prior year. A majority of that increases in regards to the opening of the North Branch Jail.

This slide is a representation of what is included in our capital projects. These include equipment for the North Branch Jail, air support rescue equipment, annual expenses for replacement of copiers and servers as well as items for the jail and the Santa Maria improvements. The final item is in the last phase of our live scan fingerprint mobile ID project which is funded with state funding.

For a source of funds from last year, the largest variance is in the decrease of fund balance which is also attributed to the opening of the North Branch Jail and operations. This slide provides a visual of the operations in the Sheriff's Office and documents that the sheriff is evenly split between law and custody at this point these percentages have not changed from 18-19 And I will now pass the next section on to Under Sheriff Saul Linver.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated31:36 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Good morning, Chair Lavagnino and Supervisors. I'm Under Sheriff Saul Linver. In looking at this staffing summary slide, I would like to bring your attention to the 19-20 recommended column. The orange color or the bar farthest on the right reflects our agency without the North Branch Jail hires. The standard non-north branch jail position increase is due to the addition of seven cannabis positions and the decrease of two alternative sentencing positions previously funded by the Community Corrections Partnership.

Last year, the Board of Supervisors approved a fund balance to be set aside for the additional hiring of LE deputies should we achieve below 3% vacancy for these deputies. This was done to help address the loss of over 50 general fund positions during the recession mentioned by CEO Miyasato in her opening statement. We have hit this mark twice and slipped back. We are currently at the 3% mark.

As we have proven with adequate staffing, we can substantially reduce overtime costs. We ask the Board of Supervisors to continue this approval as we will need the positions and we feel that we will reach into this fund if not by the end of this budget year during the next fiscal year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed32:47 · ≈ 9:32 AM

So we have a question from Supervisor Williams? Yes. So these are budgeted positions? Yes Do you have an actual?

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated33:01 · ≈ 9:33 AM

We have currently, I can tell you. I can get you an actual. Yeah, I'd

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed33:07 · ≈ 9:33 AM

love to have this slide in actual because I think that's the most important thing for us to understand.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated33:13 · ≈ 9:33 AM

We currently have, I have our current vacancies. We currently have eight LE deputy vacancies, 17 CUSSE deputy vacancies but that's due to a tranche we just received, a tranche of 13. We have four dispatcher vacancies. We are hiring two dispatchers on Monday. We currently have, well we've hired eight SSTs and we're hiring two more on Monday and we have three vacancies for the ECC's or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed33:44 · ≈ 9:33 AM

the call takers Yeah, I mean it would just be useful to pick a point in space in April of every year and just give me the numbers of actuals in a slide like this.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated34:00 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed34:03 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Mr. Chair?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8734:04 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Supervisor Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed34:08 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Mr. Lindberg, if you come back again next year, if you just put that in the report because it's been an issue every year since I've been here and I'd love it if it was just a standard part of the report instead of making us ask for it.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8734:27 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Okay, CEO Miyasato?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed34:29 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Supervisors this is our standard so I don't want to blame the sheriff. It's not that they're hiding anything we didn't ask for as part of the standard but we will do so in the future thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed34:37 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed34:38 · ≈ 9:34 AM

you. I'll just say that- Well, I do want to back up Supervisor Adam. We do ask for this

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8734:43 · ≈ 9:34 AM

numbers every year and I'll have to say that I think it's probably the lowest That I've ever heard so far in the fact that you're You know, you just got 13 more requests. We only have 17 openings vacancies That used to not be the case. So I appreciate that and the fact that we only have two dispatchers positions open is also a move in the right direction, so.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated35:07 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Also what we've been finding is the SST positions and the call taker positions have been actually promoting within the year and becoming dispatchers or deputy sheriffs or custody deputies. Awesome. We're probably running about a 5% vacancy.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8735:21 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Very good okay so as long as we have that slide probably be helpful if we just get into June budget hearings

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated35:29 · ≈ 9:35 AM

okay

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8735:30 · ≈ 9:35 AM

all right

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated35:32 · ≈ 9:35 AM

Our operating revenue, much of the increase to our revenue is due to Prop 172 and realignment. The remaining increase is from grants and contracts. In our GFC five-year summary, while the graph portrays an overall increase in general fund annually for the Sheriff's Office, the percentage of annual total general fund has decreased from 34.99% in fiscal year 15-16 to 32.10% in recommended 19-20. This decrease is total percentage amounts approximately 5.6 million, a decrease in our GFC and as reflective of the recession we've been facing.

The increase in 2016-17 was an adjustment for salary and benefit increases. The 2017-18 budget, as well as the 18-19 budget is the approved increase for jail medical costs and also the increase to salary and benefits. Anticipated accomplishments we've changed multiple agency supervision and management positions from sworn to professional staff We have issued 215 new portable radios to our field deputies.

We've issued body cameras for our foot patrol deputies out in Isla Vista and also our community resource deputies and school resource deputies along with this body worn camera project, we've increased our data sharing capability by including a cloud storage that will allow us to share images with the district attorney's office We've started our Blue Courage and Valor employee wellness classes to trainers and supervisors.

We've taken several measures to cut overtime. We are beginning and moving forward with the National Commission on Correctional Health Care pre-accreditation, and scheduling a final audit. And as you've heard, we've done some work in crisis intervention training through the Sheriff's Behavioral Sciences Unit.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8737:32 · ≈ 9:37 AM

So I'll just second on this slide if we can go back. I'm just curious on the body cameras and the sheriff had talked about the increase demand for public records requests. I could see this being just about every case so explain to me how when you said you could share that with the DA's office and I'm assuming public defender would probably also like access to that as well.

How does that work and how do you see that demand for body camera footage? I would imagine anybody who gets arrested now is going to want this. Is it available or how does that happen?

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated38:07 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Well, there's a lot. So first of all regarding PRAs we actually had to purchase software to do some redaction for our body-worn camera footage because there are certain aspects or there are certain things that may be on the footage that is not privy to be released to whoever requests it so that's on the PRAs and with SB 1421 that has put a significant strain on our records people and also on our tech people because we have to go in and do redaction these videos Going back to the sharing aspect of it with the DA's Office and Public Defender, previously what we were doing, we were either burning a DVD or somehow getting in tune with her email but if it was too large for an email. So basically we're burning a DVD and bringing it to them. With this cloud storage, we currently save body-worn camera footage for three years.

Is

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8738:54 · ≈ 9:38 AM

that an industry standard? Or how did we come up with that?

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated38:57 · ≈ 9:38 AM

It's what County Council told us we should do.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8738:58 · ≈ 9:38 AM

All right. Thank you for asking them! Things that will be helpful to know five years from now, right? Okay. We all follow the Mike Gazzone rule.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated39:10 · ≈ 9:39 AM

And what we've built into our system, we have a large library that'll hold the first year of videos then the library will automatically send your two and three to the cloud When a video reaches three years in a day, the cloud automatically deletes it. So what we can do is if there's a case where we're saving video that's going to be going to the DA's office, the DA will send us a discovery request form saying hey, we'd like to see this footage. Instead of burning the DVD, drag, drop, put it in their partition and they can go ahead and get it out.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:45 · ≈ 9:39 AM

Very

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated39:45 · ≈ 9:39 AM

cool.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed39:46 · ≈ 9:39 AM

OK.

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated39:46 · ≈ 9:39 AM

Thanks. Thank you. Onto our objectives, finish and open the North Branch Jail. Continue full cost recovery agreements for law enforcement services. We want to review our fleet costs for any cost savings. Hire and assign new sheriff service technician staff to control room post and consolidate the control room operations through a security system upgrade. You've heard the sheriff mention I will talk again in expansions. And obtain funding to address mental health illness and diversion.

On to our Renew 22, I'm not going to read all of these. You have heard some of them and you will hear others. I do want to mention that we are continuing to identify Renew22 opportunities. As an example in redesign in 2017, we launched a pilot of software for online reporting. This software allows citizens to complete and submit incident and crime reports via our website.

We decided to keep and grow the reports that could be handled by the system. To date, the system has handled 3,317 reports with an estimated staff savings of $138,418. The initial cost of the system was $22,500, and the annual cost is 16,537. So we're obviously seeing a return on investment on this. Under retain, we're going to be adding our employee wellness through programs such as Blue Courage and Valor.

We're working on an agency Wellness Center and thanks to Risk Management and the Sheriff's Posse for assisting us with this funding. We have training additions to help mentor not only new employees but those promoted into new positions. As an example, we brought back the supervisor workshops for our supervisors. Okay next I'm not going to go through in detail on our performance measures.

Here are three of them, the first one being EMD, the second one being in progress calls and the third one being our UCR reports. Next. Our next set of performance measures, I do want to make mention that the second performance measure is a new one that we created. This measure is to track medical grievances in the jail. I want to mention on the third performance measure here, I'd like to point out the extremely low rate of our downtime for what I feel is the most important computer system in our agency. That being the computer-aided dispatch system.

Our amazing systems and technology staff have been able to reduce the downtime to the extent that the vendor company is consulting with us. Service level reductions. I would like to pause on this slide for a few minutes

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8742:35 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Wait for the cheer to go up?

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated42:37 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Unfortunately, we could not add graphics to these slides or I would have had fireworks going off in the background. This is the first time in at least 10 years that the word none has appeared on this slide for the Sheriff's Office. Okay onto our restorations. The sheriff will have a quote at the end of the presentation but I heard a statement from Chair Lavagnino on Monday that fits quite well with our expansion requests.

These expansion items are need to do versus like to do. None of these are like to do with that said we do understand your position and the need to prioritize between departments and the funds you have available. So with that, the Jail Room Consolidation. This was a Renew 22 initiative. Currently we have four control rooms staffed 24 hours a day by custody deputies and soon to be sheriff service technicians.

The Sheriff Service Technician Switch will save the county over $250,000 due to staffing costs and this was a Renew 22 initiative. The 10 SST's can cover two posts. To further this savings, we are recommending control room consolidation which will decrease the four staff positions to two. Hence releasing two posts of custody deputies to address vacancies. Upon implementation of the single control room, we expect a return on investment to take less than 18 months.

Custody deputies. As you know, in 2015 consultants reported the need to increase the custody deputies in the main jail by 17 positions. With the additional staffing added for the North Branch Jail these positions were deferred. The North Branch Jail will be opening this fiscal year and there is still the need for added positions in the main jail. We request a fund balance be set aside as we've done for the LE deputies.

When we reach 3% vacancies for custody deputies, we would then be able to hire to the new staffing level. Behavioral Science Unit Manager. Last year the Board of Supervisors saw fit to fund this position for one year as a pilot. The benefits of this position to the Sheriff's Office and the citizens of Santa Barbara County have been proven time and again. Our BSU manager has been able to coordinate and conduct eight-hour crisis intervention training for all sheriff law enforcement deputies, all dispatchers, and 30% of custody deputies.

We've also been able to train approximately 2% of the agency on the advanced 40 hour CIT course. You have also heard the success of the pilot co-response team Data Analyst. Currently, our agency does not have someone on staff who can mine data from our various systems to provide statistics to our agency and the various entities we work with. With this position will enable us to gain a better understanding of the capabilities of reporting from our systems as well as expedite data retrieval.

Co-Ban MDC Replacement MDCs are mobile data computers. These are the computers in the patrol vehicles used to provide information to the field units. Our in-car MDCs are 7 and 8 years old, and use 3G technology which could become non-supported at any time by AT&T. Our MDCs have been unsupported for 5 years. Records Management System Upgrade This is the oldest system of our three primary systems.

The records management system houses all of our data from the automated reporting system, as well as field contacts and citations. This is our primary system used for reporting crime statistics to various agencies. The Sheriff's Office went paperless reporting some time ago to address the over 14,000 multiple page crime and incident reports taken annually. The Automated Reporting System, or ARS, houses all investigative and incident reports written by both field and custody staff as well as the records of contacts by field units. The automated reporting system is a module of the records management system.

Dispatch Governance Group. The dispatch governance group is composed of stakeholders of the dispatch center at times there are items or services discovered by the group that would benefit all stakeholders however they do not have any funds to move such projects forward this request would give them these funds Chief Deputy Sheriff. During the recession of 2008, we found the need to unfund several management positions in order to maintain line-level staffing.

One of these positions was a chief deputy sheriff that oversaw the administrative services, financial services and operation support divisions. These divisions now report directly to the undersheriff. Body-worn cameras. As mentioned, we have outfitted 30 of our field staff with body-worn cameras. This request would outfit the remaining field deputies with body-worn cameras and require adding one computer system specialist to manager the cameras in the system.

Data center replacement and redundancy. The current hardware in our data center is about seven years old. The life expectancy of these items is routinely five years. This expansion item is twofold, first the replacement of the current aged data center and second, the creation of redundant data center in the North County. I will now turn over our presentation back to Sheriff Brown.

0:48 – 0:599 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8748:03 · ≈ 9:48 AM

I have a question first. Yes. On the MDC replacement Yes, Chair Levine. Why? Like on an equipment replacement like you know you're going to replace your vehicles at a certain point and I'm sure you have a fund that you fund and then when you get to it five year, at the end of the five years you have enough in there to buy more vehicles. On something like those computers, you know you're going to replace them. Are we setting aside money every year so that we know at the end of the seven-year or eight-year cycle we've got the money set aside to do it?

CommentUnder Sheriff Saul LinverProposedself-stated48:38 · ≈ 9:48 AM

We have not been. It is something we are starting to do with many of our

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8748:43 · ≈ 9:48 AM

larger, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed48:45 · ≈ 9:48 AM

Okay. All right. Um, great job Saul and hope I do just want to make one correction where the undersheriff, uh, misspoke on one thing and that is the CIT training for our custody staff other than brand new people. 100% of our custody staff have also received the CIT training. In closing, let me reaffirm that we are committed to renew 2022. We recognize and understand the tremendous fiscal challenges that the county has faced over the last decade or so and the prospective potential problems that are on the horizon. So we're committed to providing better and more effective service at less cost whenever that is possible.

We still do have ongoing challenges though in three areas that I want to emphasize as I close. One with regards to staffing, although we've made significant headway and filling our positions there is still a structural staffing gap. And while the Sheriff's Office has had many hiring successes, we continue to be faced with just as many challenges. Number two, as you've heard mental illness continues to be a growing challenge within our county which affects many departments. We are collaborating with many other county and departments and community stakeholders to address this issue. And some exciting things are happening that I want to reemphasize. One is the co-response pilot that has had great results but is not currently funded.

We are seeking grant funding for its continuance. But if we are not successful in obtaining it, you can expect to see a collective presentation back here later seeking appropriate funding to continue this very valuable program. The behavioral science unit has been established and ingrained within our organization. In partnership with others, we continue to seek grants for a variety of mental health-related endeavors including medication assisted treatment, CIT, crisis intervention training, community based and jail based restoration to competency programs, adolescent mental health services and law enforcement assisted diversion.

We're really trying to look at this as not just a sheriff's initiative or imperative, but a county wide imperative. And we need to work together in those areas and in addition to those local efforts were continuing, as I said, at the state level as well. Our ability to effectively respond to the growing demand of data requests is crippled by our outdated and antiquated systems.

We have to make decisions that are data-driven, and unfortunately the mechanism for us to obtain data oftentimes is through a hand search. A very, very antiquated way of doing things that pulls valuable staff away from other projects and initiatives while they're doing that. And data can give us a much better roadmap of where we should be going with policing In our frontline law enforcement efforts. So again, I want to just take a moment to emphasize our needs in that area both in terms of equipment and in terms of staff and manpower But I wanted to take a moment now to end this presentation with some very positive thoughts This past year members of our agency bravely and boldly and compassionately Handled a myriad of critical incidents Everything from fires to flooding to mud and debris flows, from attempted suicides to a triple murder.

And despite the cutbacks and thanks in large part to the extraordinary efforts of the men and women at the Sheriff's Office, crime rates in all jurisdictions for which the Sheriff's Office provides frontline law enforcement service are at their lowest levels in at least 10 years. These include total part one crimes, violent crimes and property crime rates. Overall crime fell by 11%.

Violent crime fell by 20% in those areas that we serve. In partnership with our collaborative partners in behavioral wellness, the district attorneys and public defenders offices and a host of mental health advocacy groups We have made and continue to make great strides in how we work with and help those who suffer from mental illness. And as you've heard, we're not finished yet.

We are six months away or so from completing an opening a state of the art correctional and rehabilitation and reentry facility that will be the opposite of our currently overcrowded obsolete and antiquated main jail And as I mentioned, we're very excited about that. We implemented training focused on employee wellness. We raised funds for Special Olympics. We sponsored blood drives and this past year with your support and the help of many different agencies and community organizations, the men and women of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office protected and served the people of this great county in a truly exemplary manner And I can assure you that they're going to do that again this next year.

So, that concludes our presentation and we'd be happy to answer any questions that you might have. You

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8754:15 · ≈ 9:54 AM

don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed54:16 · ≈ 9:54 AM

want to read your quote, Sheriff? Actually it doesn't, yeah. Come on. So the quote is a Harry Truman quote. Progress occurs when courageous and skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better. And there's double entendre there. I'm referring to the leaders within the sheriff's office and I'm referring to you as well. Seize the moment and the opportunity to make things better.

Very good, Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed54:42 · ≈ 9:54 AM

Well I love a lot of your comments especially after going to your recognition awards on Friday and hearing in detail many of the situations that your personnel have been in. I have to ask you know the rhetoric of despite the cutbacks what cutbacks are you speaking Last year.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed55:08 · ≈ 9:55 AM

I'm not really referring to last year it's you know the reality as is as was mentioned. You know we are still. We've lost 90.5 general fund positions in the sheriff's office since 2007 It doesn't mean we're down 90 positions, because we've gained about 32 of those positions back through alternative means. Through various grants, through the AB 109 funding, through additional contracts with entities that we provide service for.

But the fact of the matter is, we are still significantly below the optimum and arguably not even completely optimum levels that we were at in 2007. So we are still operating at minimal staffing in most areas of the organization. We have 25 percent fewer sworn management positions than we had in 2007. We have no longer a number of different elements to the department that we had. We had a crime prevention unit, we had a research and planning unit, Twice as many narcotic enforcement officers back then. So, the reality is we have had to pare back considerably from where we were and we need to get to the point where we start to... I don't know that we'll ever get back to where we were in our lifetime certainly not in our professional lifetimes probably but I think we certainly need to try to look at how can we work towards getting back some of those positions And I say that not in any kind of way that, you know, I don't want to project any kind of ingratitude for what has happened and what you've done in the face of some overwhelming fiscal hardships.

But I just say it to emphasize the fact that we still need additional resources In the sheriff's office and you know to make that happen we need additional funding and to make that happen there has to be additional revenue in the county somehow so I just. That's what I meant by that not by cuts that we've had to endure in the most recent budget.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed57:19 · ≈ 9:57 AM

Well, I mean I pick up on it because you know look I'm very supportive of staffing I think addresses one of the long term issues Really asked for a partnership from your department and trying to address which is the cost of overtime. I'd much rather spend a little more on staffing than a lot more on overtime, but the rhetoric that you use like that doesn't feel like a partnership. It feels like most of the time we do these it feels like leverage and And I feel like every year we get a laundry list. It's totally impossible fiscally to fulfill and that it's sort of a political blame game that we can't do it all, but you know, we can do some. That's the way it feels.

And I want to address staffing, but I think there's something would be much easier to address staffing if we knew there was a game plan on where to get. And the game plan, to me, on where to get is to address cost drivers in the department which I don't think we have a slide on but you guys might have info on one is one that you've made great progress on which is the amount of the population that is in jail awaiting trial as opposed to for a conviction. That's a huge cost driver.

I've seen that data, but it's not here today. I think it would be great to have an update on that because if we continue to reduce that, it won't reduce costs. It'll reduce the growth of costs. And then the other that I really love an update on is how many people you have out on electronic monitoring. Because that's a, that would be a significant possibility of cost savings as well.

Do you guys have any data on how many do you have out on electronic monitoring right now? I'm sorry that you see.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:00 – 1:0611 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:00:06 · ≈ 10:00 AM

The statement that we've had to endure cuts as rhetoric, but it's reality. And what I want you to show is another hip pocket

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:00:14 · ≈ 10:00 AM

slide. Let's stop at this slide for a second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:00:18 · ≈ 10:00 AM

Okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:00:19 · ≈ 10:00 AM

That's the last five years. I get it that you are down since the recession everybody is, but that doesn't represent a And I'm not saying that it doesn't represent a commitment, but I'm just saying that you have to understand is an undersheriff tried to point out

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:00:48 · ≈ 10:00 AM

Pay and benefit raises to our employees, and the additional cost of additional jail medical services that were approved back in 2016-17. And it's left us very, very flat in terms of... In fact, it's left us in a reduced mode in terms of the percentage general fund that we've been getting prior to that. Exclusive of the jail project and again. I don't want to You know the reality is I think there's a tendency to look at say well The sheriff's office is being funded X number of dollars because we're building the northern branch jail and believe me We need and are appreciative of the Northern Branch Jail But the sheriff's office is the department in the county that has the broadest and the deepest depth of responsibility in terms of the different things that we do.

And it's not just about the jail, the reality is we have a variety of different areas that we have to deliver service to, not the least of which is frontline law enforcement for 45% or so of the people in the county. And we have struggled and continue to struggle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:01:58 · ≈ 10:01 AM

Let him,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:01:59 · ≈ 10:01 AM

let the sheriff finish

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:02:00 · ≈ 10:02 AM

and then you can ask him another question. I just want to say if you could recruit more people in frontline law enforcement, I would want to fund it. In particular in drug enforcement, I'd want to fund it. But we're still dealing with that recruitment issue correct? I mean, I think you've said in this presentation and you've kind of said to the world that we don't have enough people in drug enforcement but there isn't a request here.

You don't know that you can recruit more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:02:34 · ≈ 10:02 AM

people. Supervisor Williams, when we went through the post-recession years and when every year was a multi-million dollar hit to the Sheriff's Office there was no standing up in front of you requesting expansions because we were bailing the water out of the ship at that point And the reality is we have stabilized somewhat now. But in the past I was criticized by members of this board because I hadn't brought needs to the attention of the board so you can't have it both ways. The reality is you have to know and understand what it is that we have in terms of our resources And recognize that there is an issue this slide here shows you the general fund contribution to the sheriff's office.

Okay in 2000 this goes to 2012 not even back to 2007 but it shows you that we that blue line shows the percentage decrease that were getting from a high of Around 37%, just over 37% to now we're at 32% of the general fund. If we had the same level of general fund contribution to the Sheriff's Office today that we did then, we'd have another five plus million dollars in our budget. I wouldn't be here saying that we have problems and issues with staffing because we would have a significant number of additional people. But our can you know we continue to see a decline in the percentage general fund and we are the largest general fund driven department.

Most of our funding comes from that reason for that revenue source so it is I just wanted to be on your radar is not right it's not rhetoric its reality.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:04:21 · ≈ 10:04 AM

I guess what when when the numbers keep on going up and I'm not sure that we're addressing all the drivers for cost. That's where my principal concern is, and when we make large commitments and increases of commitment in general fund and staffing, and we had those slides, I don't feel like the rhetoric changes. To me every one of these budget hearings have been almost exactly the same And that to me is not necessarily the kind of working relationship that I feel like we should have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:05:09 · ≈ 10:05 AM

But Supervisor Williams, the reality is we haven't had any large increases in general fund. We've had one general fund position that has been replaced since the recession, one and we have not had a significant increase in our general fund to address things other than Increasing costs and expenses of employees and of services and supplies and equipment. You asked about alternatives to custody, and I'd like Chief Deputy Wazlowski come up here and give you an update on that, but I'd like to tee that up also by letting you know that the reality is we have already reduced a significant number of the types of inmates who are in our jail.

So although we have 70% or so number of pretrial people in the jail The vast majority of them are either in there for felony crimes or they're in there because they have failed to appear for misdemeanor crimes and have warrants that have been issued by the courts. And the authority that the sheriff has, that I have statutorily, to release people pretrial is limited. And most of the people who are eligible for pre-trial release are either already diverted and not in our jail system.

Or are there because they're facing some other kind of charge that holds them there. We have done and continue to do what we can in terms of our alternative custody, and some of that responsibility has been transferred over to the probation department, and as a result of the decline in some of the CCP funds. But we nevertheless still do have an alternative custody program, and I'll turn it over to Chief Deputy Wasilewski to brief you on that.

1:07 – 1:166 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:07:02 · ≈ 10:07 AM

Supervisor Williams to the chair, we have 88 inmates and alternative sentencing right now. Over the last couple of years we've seen that number fluctuate quite a bit. We tried various different efforts to increase it. Our goal was to have it remain at 120 per day. We couldn't sustain that number and there's myriad reasons why Some of the reasons are because of the sentencing structures and how long it takes people to get adjudicated. They just don't have the time available, or they would much rather spend 15 days in jail rather than go out on the electronic monitoring and then they're done with it. They don't have anything to do with us.

There's a very large, there's an awful lot of reasons why we can't sustain it. That's why we made the decision to reduce our staffing through the CCP and actually downsize that bureau, the Alternative Sentencing Bureau. So you no longer have three positions in that? We're gonna have, well we took three positions out. So we're gonna end up with a couple of people up in Santa Maria and a couple of people down in Santa Barbara to manage it because we still have 80 some odd that we're gonna have out on it but we just couldn't sustain that amount of staff on a program that only saw or helped that many inmates. I mean this is disappointing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:08:47 · ≈ 10:08 AM

In the last couple years, this was always something that was under discussion about how to address long-term issues. And look I agree with you that most of the people that are in jail should be in jail but that's not the question. The question is everyone that's in jail should be in jail and I think the answer is probably not yes. You know it. It's kind of disappointing that we really don't have any more people in alternative sense and seeing than we had 2 years ago.

What we've been spending. Half a million million on it every year. I mean you know it's a lot of money to not have any any

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:31 · ≈ 10:09 AM

progress. Supervisor Williams the chair, you know, I think Determination of whether someone is in custody or not in custody, is not the exclusive decision of the Sheriff's Office. And our alternative to custody program is a very small one in comparison to the reality that it's the courts that have the authority and are really involved in terms of determining if someone should be released pretrial. That is a decision that is really up to the courts and to the judges.

And we have had discussion and ongoing discussion about pretrial approaches that are connected with bail reform, for example. And you're aware that has been kind of all over the map. We have had legislative change and then we had a counter initiative which passed and will be on the ballot to withdraw that law. We have had some court decisions in that arena and the court is struggling with this in many ways.

But there's gonna, I'm sure that there will be an evolution in this area but as Chief Deputy Wasilewski said we are also hamstrung by some other legislative changes that have had impacts on the criminal justice system which have reduced the incentive for people to go into the pretrial program and who they choose instead to stay and finish their sentences in jail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:11:00 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Well, I've been definitely on the same page of you as that. And and I also wouldn't say I mean, I'm a big fan of you as head of state sheriffs. You know, you have been definitely brought the association in a great direction. I just feel like for the partnership to exist here, I need to see urgency and usually I feel like we go back to the fact that these numbers are similar to Other county jails, but my point is that doesn't mean it's the best thing for the system. That doesn't mean it's not the right thing for the system. That doesn' mean that we're using our dollars best on the most hardcore folks and deprioritizing some of the other folks, some of the mentally ill, some of the other folks you got around in your jail and I guess I would just It would really help for this partnership to see urgency on the percentage of population that's awaiting trial and urgency on the numbers in electronic monitoring because it's hard, it's hard for me to imagine that there's only 72 low risk folks in the system at a time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:12:26 · ≈ 10:12 AM

Can we go to Supervisor? One parting comment and that is The reality is that I agree with you in 99% of what you just said. I think that we have to look at, and Have alternative sentencing, even better than that look for ways to reduce recidivism so that we don't have a revolving door of people coming back into the jail. And much of our strategy and much of what we do is predicated on that and that's one of the things that the new jail is going to give us a much better way to approach our programming and helping people overcome addictions and anger management issues and things that are impediments to them being successful.

But it's a balancing act. And I also want to point again to the fact that crime is at a 10-year low in county areas right now, and the jail has a piece of that responsibility. So we can't just say, well, we're just going to open the doors and start pushing people out. We have to get people in alternative programs that are still hold them accountable. And those have yet to be developed, and those are certainly on the drawing board But again, it's a complex issue that involves primarily the courts but also the probation department and us as well.

Supervisor Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:13:45 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Yeah, thank you. I think we all know that I've had my differences with the sheriff over the years but what I just heard happen here is my friend Mr. Williams bristled up a lot when Mr. Brown started talking about how we need revenue. And that's just a keen grasp of the obvious. And then that discussion devolved into management considerations and how you could differently manage the thing to make good use of the budget, which is all well and good.

The valid and fair point though, that the general fund percentage has been reduced cannot just be overlooked. And this board has a responsibility for revenue enhancement and cost control. And I don't think we do a very good job of either. Our revenue enhancement programs leave quite a bit to be desired. And the sheriff doesn't give increases of salary and benefits, this board does.

So, and that may be necessary in some cases. But I think we do that indiscriminately and I voted against a number of different packages that this board has approved over my time here. And the least we could do is approve other revenue enhancements, and we just don't do it. So this whole discussion's sort of like fake acrimony and it confirms the description in Mr. Caldwell's column this morning that this is kabuki theater because Like a thing that is Just unnecessary and it sort of allows us to have a lot of emotion and dust up about revenue. And that's the real problem, that's the elephant in the room is we don't have enough revenue to do all this stuff because all the things that the sheriffs want to do here are not unreasonable. I think given unlimited amount of revenue, we probably approve every one of those things.

So I think we kind of got to go back to the beginning and remember what the point behind the exercise is here.

1:16 – 1:295 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:16:45 · ≈ 10:16 AM

All right, I'm going to give some other folks a chance here. Supervisor Hartman and then Supervisor Hart?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.831:16:50 · ≈ 10:16 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair. I want to start broad and then come down a little more narrowly. And the first thing I want to say is I think just as with behavioral wellness, I think we're turning a bit of a corner here. And I'm just delighted to see it. And there are four things I want to mention that I think are really positive. And the first is the crisis intervention and the co-response. It's almost weekly that I get emails commending the sheriff's deputies for avoiding a terrible tragic situation. And I think that saves us a lot of money and it saves even more, a lot of heartache.

The second thing I want to mention is Isla Vista and we have seen culture change occurring there and it's led both by the CSD and Isla Vista but working in close partnership with the foot patrol and the sheriff's office there. It has been extraordinary, and there's a whole list of things that are happening but I think to say that the foot patrol is part of the broader education mission there And that comes across in everything that they do. And I really want to call them out for being creative and working with the community in new ways, and it's really making a difference.

The third thing I want to talk about is cannabis enforcement. It takes a lot behind the scenes but what I see Is the public outreach an explanation and people being willing to go out to communities again and again. And this is a very complex set of ordinances, and it falls to that department often to explain, and I'm very appreciative. And the final thing I want to mention is In in preface is the focus on wellness and employee wellness. I think overtime is a factor but We haven't had a horrible incident in our county involving our sheriffs. They are professional, respectful, dignified in their dealings with people who are not at their best to say the least and I think that comes from the mentoring and the culture but it also is something that a focus on keeping the deputies well Absolutely critical, because if you're at the end of your own rope it's hard to handle people who are at the end of theirs.

So all of that I think kudos and it's really extraordinary. What I'm puzzling about is that crime is down as you say. The diversion we're putting more and more emphasis on that and technology so all of these things should be cost savings We, what I'm struggling with is we don't really have a good benchmark. We look to pre-recession and say well maybe that should be our benchmark and I'm not so sure that's the case. I know the CGL report looked to the jail and helped give us some I'm wondering if there's anything else we can do to look in light of these new diversion technology, crime down. What is it that we could study or look at benchmark counties Some way have a better way objective way to judge what our needs are for the sheriff's department.

So just put that out there

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:20:51 · ≈ 10:20 AM

great supervisor heart

GuestHartProposed · by introduction1:20:53 · ≈ 10:20 AM

Yeah, I just want to thank you and your leadership team and all the men and women in the department who? Are putting their lives on the line every day to? To protect us and to keep us safe. And the information that you shared with us about violent crime, property crime, crime in general being down is really significant and important. And people need to sort of pause and take that in. I also wanna specifically thank you and your team for finding the funding for the co-response team. That is a really important community benefit that has tremendous support across the board. And we're all optimistic that the grant funding is going to come through. But if not, as your slide described, we're gonna have to courageously work together and figure out a way to fund that because everybody wants to see that happen.

I want to thank your leadership for putting together the Behavioral Sciences Unit. Dr. Cheryl Lynn Lee is doing a tremendous job, and for me personally that is a no brainer on your request of additional funding requests because we want to see that happen. We want to see additional crisis intervention training to more departments in the county and Of your officers that's really, really important. Your leadership with stepping up and trying to help divert more folks out of the criminal justice system into more appropriate care for mental illness is really important and It deserves recognition and is something that I really am supportive of.

Coming from my experience at the City Council, recruitment for law enforcement is a challenge in every department. And I'm really pleasantly surprised to see you're at 5% vacancy rate. That requires a lot of effort. To get to that level. I know it's been frustrating probably to everybody, to have staffing levels not where you want them to be. But it doesn't happen by accident. It takes determined creative thinking to get people to get into law enforcement and to stay in law enforcement.

The success that you've had with computer-aided dispatch is also very impressive. That's a really critical technology, and you've got that rolling. So there's a lot to be proud of. There's a lot to be celebrated. There's a lot of progress that's happening. And I'm really going to invest my focus in on the collaboration and the additional partnerships that need to happen To make progress on the things that my colleagues are talking about, that you want to see happen too. The alternative sentencing project and effort isn't delivering the results that I'd like to see and I think you would like to see.

And I don't know that it necessarily is best focused in the Sheriff's Department. And what I think the CCP did with allocating those resources in a different way might be a smarter way to do that. It doesn't really matter. Who does this? There are many partners in this effort. There's the courts, there's the district attorney, there's the public defender's office. There's the sheriff's department, there is Mr. Malikian in the COO's office and I just think that's where we need to focus on that collaboration working together with everybody chipping away at this cuz one thing you know with my fresh eyes when I'm looking at this presentation looking at this information. The one thing that really struck me was slide six And if you could put that up real quickly.

The fact that 43% of all of your resources are equally distributed between custody operations and law enforcement, to me is an opportunity. That is something that we want to shift. We want to have more patrol deputies out serving the public, interacting with the public, doing community oriented policing, solving problems at the front end, and fewer resources spent on folks in jail. Trying to get them, the people in jail, And the skills and the training and the assistance that they need to get out of jail, and not get back into jail. So globally speaking to your quote which I think was very inspiring, that's what all of us have to do together is figure out, break down the silos, figure out what works, invest in those things that are working and make progress on shifting That chart so that when we come back five years from now as mr.

Guzzi likes to point out that those numbers are different and they're more appropriately distributed And I think that's better for the community. That's better for the department and that's better for the public All right. Well, thank you for those comments

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:25:25 · ≈ 10:25 AM

So wow, we heard a lot of all over the place today this morning And you know, I think I had that it I used to have your reaction when we were going through because you know from the sheriff's perspective and this is something that I've really come to understand is. He doesn't set salaries and benefits and we have seen increase in general fund contribution. You know a significant continued rise so that's the commitment from this board, but it has been eaten up in in salaries and benefits.

And rightfully so I mean I have supported those because I think it's necessary for us to recruit retain men and women who are willing to patrol our streets and man the jail that we have to be competitive at least with our neighboring counties are going to continue to lose people and. We can't on one side complain that we don't we can't you know you have a vacancy rate and then the other hand, we don' want to pay people what Neighboring counties are doing where people could leave easily and go to San Luis Obispo County Ventura County Kern County so You know, I think the board as a whole though you know, so we always feel like If we're not providing your laundry list That is always very extensive. And I understand why because I've told other department heads that Don't complain to me during the year if it's not.

If you didn't ask for it, you got to come here and ask for it and make us make that determination so we have made that determination but I had I've got staff working on right now what the board's commitment to public safety is. And I can tell you in last year's budget 62 1⁄2 percent of all general fund went to public safety Now that does include public defender, the district attorney's office, fire department, sheriff's department and probation.

But that is the commitment of the Board of Supervisors. Everybody I think when they're running for public office tells people that they want to make sure that they're safe in their neighborhood. And a 62 1⁄2%, and I'm not sure Mr. Frapwell if we have any updated numbers for this year or we can get it? Okay well we'll get that but I'm sure it's pretty close so We can make the argument that your department's getting less of the general fund, but that the number is going up. Those are all statistics are in the eye of the beholder. But the fact that you only have a 5% vacancy rate right now to me tells me that you guys have heard what we've been trying to say is it's hard for us to approve another ten positions when the ten that we have right now weren't filled.

That used to be the argument and now I see that we have 17 custody deputies open. We just had a tranche of 13. We're filling these positions and that's what's most important to me so. I think Sheriff's Department has made a you know really. I think it's kind of a county as a whole all the departments are refining Priorities and changing the way we've kind of think. I'm sure for law enforcement, it's difficult mindset to think about the main trying to get people out of jail that's probably a different mindset than when you first put a badge on. And definitely we all understand that it's a balancing act that we want to make sure we keep those people in there that are a threat. The fact that violent crime is down 20%, that's awesome. That's a great message and I'm not sure if people in the community really feel that or I guess if that happens in your neighborhood, you don't really care if it's down 20%, it's up 100% next to you.

So I just want to say the fact that we don't have any service level reductions this year, the fact that we only have a 5% vacancy rate, all very positive signs. We obviously can't do everything that you ask for but the commitment here is that we will do everything that we can so appreciate your presentation. I'm not sure if we want to do public comment now or after the end of the jail presentation.

After? Okay, so why don't we work into the jail presentation, Northern Branch Jail and then we'll open it up for public comment.

1:30 – 1:409 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:30:15 · ≈ 10:30 AM

Mr. Chairman, members of the board, good morning. We did think it was probably appropriate and helpful to at least take an opportunity this morning to give your board an update specifically on the Northern Branch Jail Operating Fund as this is a budget workshop but also to give you kind of an update and a reminder what the project scope is. You'll recall that the Northern Branch Jail has been in the works for more than 20 years as we discussed at our opening comments on Monday's workshop But it's a construction of 134,000 square foot tension facility located on about 50 acres in North County.

The project budget is roughly $111 million, 80 million of that coming from state AB 900 funding, the balance coming from local match. The project adds 376 rated beds, including 32 important beds that dedicated for enhanced medical and mental health services. And it has or bring our that's adds to a rate of capacity of 819 in the main jail here in South County.

Importantly, the project does implement best practice as it relates to direct supervision philosophy. It incorporates expanded inmate program space and it's designed to facilitate video visitation and video arraignment. An update on the construction is we're about 86% complete, we do the current schedule shows that it should be substantially complete by the second quarter of next fiscal year with beneficial occupancy to incur by occur by March 2020. The utility connections to the site are 100 percent complete The external walls, roof and interior walls are substantially complete and in process of being completed.

The interior work continues and the exterior site work has been hindered by inclement weather but is back on schedule. Specifically as it relates to the operating funding plan you'll recall that your board adopted as part of the fiscal year 2011-12 budget to begin a program to prepare for the full operating costs of the new jail when that opens. As a result of that plan, we've been setting aside increasing amounts of general fund dollars each year into a fund so that when it opens will have fully built into our annual allocation of general fund discretionary revenues sufficient funds to operate the jail.

I'll show you a slide in a moment which has a bunch numbers but basically We're currently projecting the operating costs in the new jail to be about $20 million by fiscal year 22-23. Consistent with that plan, the preliminary budget is currently being developed includes 12.7 million dollars going into this operating fund in the upcoming fiscal year. I have a question

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:33:17 · ≈ 10:33 AM

on that Mr. Frappel. Is that part of the $77 million general fund contribution that was on the sheriff's side or is it the $12 million?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:33:26 · ≈ 10:33 AM

Mr. Chairman, the 12.7 is above the numbers that were on previous slides for the sheriff. So I guess we could if it would be helpful, we could stack the ongoing increase in amount put aside in the Northern Branch Operating Fund. On top of the funds we showed in the sheriff's I mean that I'm not sure which ways fair but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:33:48 · ≈ 10:33 AM

it's just nice to know what yeah, I mean it would just be nice to have had that with it while being you know beat up for not putting enough general funds and it would be nice to have all the general funds included right or looking at these things. And we'll be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:34:03 · ≈ 10:34 AM

happy to pull that information together for you. As we prepare for the Northern Grand Jail operations funds, uh we are working closely on these four major initiatives. One is making sure that we fine tune the timing of the hiring and staffing from new jail both in support of the jail from general services as far as maintenance but also for the staffing um for programming and custody deputies.

In addition, we're working with and prepared um To implement the jail services supply agreements with all of our third party providers from laundry to food, to commissary etc. Also working closely with the Sheriff's Department and council with respect to amendments to the existing CFMG agreement for jail medical services. The important thing on that amendment is to finalize the inmate transition plan as we open a new jail and which inmates will be moving from South County into the new jail facility.

That is also complicated, or at least has to take into account the timing of the plan improvements for the main jail. So once we open the Northern Branch Jail, it's expectation as we move inmates out that we'll be able to free space in the main jail and begin those renovations that the Sheriff talked about earlier. And finally, Facility Maintenance Cost Responsibilities will continue to work on and make sure poised when the facility opens.

Here's the charter numbers, you know no presentation I give would be complete unless I have a chart of numbers and so here you'll see by fiscal year the GMC base amount that is the amount we built into that comes out of the ongoing general fund discretionary revenues, the amount of increase each year which is the total general fund contribution The amount moving over to the right that comes out of that fund to pay for the, begin to pay for the operating costs through jail as we specifically, as we've added custody deputies to the Sheriff's Department. And then the remaining balance at the end. So let me just take you across the fiscal year 19-20 line.

As we prepare the preliminary budget and the recommended budget ultimately for your board's consideration The base amount coming from the prior year was $10.9 million, we're adding $1.8 million increase for a total of 12.7 that'll be set aside out of the next year's ongoing discretionary revenues into this fund. The Sheriff's budget will reflect a draw of 14.6 million and that is to pay for the customer deputies that we've essentially added and the other staffing we've added to the department in preparation for jail opening. So that leaves a remaining balance of 13.1 projected at the end of next fiscal year, which rolls forward and ultimately you can see how as the general fund in total GFC your general funding contribution increases it'll get to about 19.9 million dollars in fiscal year 22-23 is the operating cost so That's currently where we are.

It's something we watch closely and monitor with the Sheriff's Department and General Services as we move throughout the completion of the project, and we believe we're on solid footing with the plan. The cautionary note is that the biggest cost we have operationally that we haven't yet put a fine point on Is that medical costs and so that's something as we continue to negotiate. I'm sorry I know what the middle cost medical medical

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:37:57 · ≈ 10:37 AM

yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:37:58 · ≈ 10:37 AM

And as we continue to negotiate that that amendment that'll be there. The cost number will most focus on. So with that I'd be happy answer any questions that your board might have on the northern branch shale operating fund.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:38:14 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Well I think this is a this slide is the one that tells you if you don't What happens when you plan and what happens when you don't plan? The fact that I remember putting that first million in there, and thinking we were so far away. There's no way we'll ever get to 19 million. And here we are almost at 13 million now that we've carved out of the general fund. So a lot of sacrifices that were made along the way for many other departments and priorities that we weren't able to get to but this is something that much needed and You know people continue to put this priority on the back burner.

And I'm just thankful to all the board members that have sacrificed throughout the years to get us to this point and appreciate the plan that's there and told many times it wasn't going to work. And we're only three years away from hitting our number so Supervisor Hart

GuestHartProposed · by introduction1:39:09 · ≈ 10:39 AM

Yeah, I think this is impressive and it shows if you're planning ahead what you can achieve. And so the thing that occurs to me is in regards to the population of the main jail and how we shift folks over to the North Branch Jail. What is the plan to reduce the population of the main jail? Now that we have this new asset, and how can we plan ahead like this? And have a chart that shows over time that we're gonna reduce those costs. We're gonna reduce that population and we're gonna use the collaborative efforts of all the other departments. The courts, the public defender's office probation, the district attorney's office to achieve that result and shift those costs from custody to patrol.

So that is what I'm interested in knowing more about. Obviously not today, not necessarily in the moment but before the budget's adopted, I'd like to see a lot of work on this.

1:40 – 1:466 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:40:06 · ≈ 10:40 AM

Okay we'll open it up for public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:40:09 · ≈ 10:40 AM

Chair Leveneau, members of the board, we have nine requests to speak on this item and we're going to begin with Andy Caldwell to be followed by Pam Flint-Tambo.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:40:20 · ≈ 10:40 AM

Chair Lavagnino, members of the board, Andy Caldwell representing Colab. I'd like to draw your attention to slide 13. This is the second performance measures deputies will arrive at 90% of in progress calls within eight minutes. The actuals were in the 60's recommended in the 70's but this speaks to is we don't have enough people on patrol. We don't have Can you imagine if you're one of the five or 6,000 people that called and it's going to take more than eight minutes?

We need more people on patrol. With regard to the South County Jail we think you should tear it down a start over just like you did with the North County new building. Supervisor Hart come up with the same plan set aside X percent of general fund money build a new jail. You're throwing bad money Good money after bad money, it's not a safe design. We want our deputies to be kept safe as well as the inmate population.

One of the things that we talked about earlier during my general public comment is this issue of the fact that revenues for income from the private sector has been relatively flat. Well, you've heard me say this a bazillion times. Manufacturing and industry are the middle class jobs for blue collar workers. Since 92, when we started the stats, we lost Grefco, Unical, Santa Maria-Childa, Union Sugar, Arrow Automotive, Sunoco and Radco. And we're about to lose Diablo. Diablo has a payroll of $225 million a year.

Now their property taxes are going into slow at 20 million a year but it's a one billion dollar output and some of that hits our North County. And the point here is, is you've got Exxon. You wouldn't declare an emergency to get Exxon back on. We lost Exxon and Veneco were the top two tax producers millions a year. That's what pays these bills! And one of the things we keep asking you to do, you will not even be honest enough or forthright enough to generate the data. We keep asking you to look at spinning off the federal and state employees. There's about 2,000 of them at a minimum. They're federal and state employees. You're paying their pension debt.

How much is that costing the general fund that could go into public safety? Been asking that for a year or two now. Why won't your staff, why don't you ask your staff to cough up the data? Why won't you even look at it? We believe you can give SEIU employees a raise. I betcha they'd vote for it if they got the chance and somebody would lead them to that water.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:38 · ≈ 10:43 AM

Our next speaker is Pam Flint Tambo to be followed by Tom Franklin.

CommentPam Flint TamboProposed1:43:48 · ≈ 10:43 AM

Good morning, Chair Lovenio and Supervisors. I'm representing the League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara. We support a correction system with its primary goal of being rehabilitation. That is the prevention of recidivism with emphasis on alternatives to incarceration and on compliance with state standards for facilities and staffing. So in line with that, we are urging you to fully fund the continuation of three programs that have shown great initial success.

Two of those are funded in the sheriff's budget. The position of Behavioral Sciences Manager, currently Dr. Cheryl Lynn Lee. This position is key to the behavioral wellness programs and to crisis intervention trainings for law enforcement officers. It provides essential coordination of sheriff calls for assistance for citizens with mental illnesses, collaboration and communication between agencies and others, data collection for evaluation of programs Planning to address prevention of violence and reduced use of the resources of the Sheriff Department and Behavioral Wellness Department by frequent uses of services in the implementation of CIT. This is a core position, and it's critically important.

The Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program is funded through Behavioral Wellness, but it goes along with these other programs. The other program that we're interested in seeing continue is the co-response teams, the teaming of a law enforcement deputy with a mental health professional to take 911 calls or deputy backup request calls involving mental illness crises. Dr. Lee meets daily with the co-response team to problem solve, track data and debrief.

A recent report on the first six months of the co-response operation found that out of 345 encounters with early intervention and deescalation only four people required an arrest. So these programs are beginning to meet an ideal collaborative standard of keeping mentally ill people out of jail in hospitals and diverting them to appropriate treatment These programs, as we know, still lack the resources for underlying deficiencies such as affordable and supervised housing for those mentally ill people who need it.

Remains need for more resources in both North and South County but these programs took an enormous amount of energy and time to get started and they've proven to be initially very successful. To be truly effective they need additional time and funding So we respectfully urge the Board of Supervisors to lead this county into the future with these proven effective programs for improved quality of life for all citizens and probable cost savings as

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:46:42 · ≈ 10:46 AM

well. Thank you. Our next speaker is Tom Franklin, to be followed by Rob Kirsch.

1:46 – 1:526 turns

CommentTom FranklinProposedself-stated1:46:54 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Mr. Chair, members of the board, my name is Tom Franklin. I am a member of the Behavioral Wellness Commission. I volunteer with NAMI. I teach a family-to-family class, run an evening group, volunteer for the Mental Wellness Center teaching mental health matters to sixth graders here mostly on the South Coast but also in the San Dines Valley. And most importantly, I have a family member with severe mental illness who I am pretty sure has touched every department in this county. Maybe not the Ag Commissioner and he's touched them all several times. So I'm here to support some of the Sheriff's programs, the Behavioral Sciences Unit, the CIT program, the Co-Response and also Behavioral Wellness' AOT program.

Dr. Lee has done an amazing job with the crisis intervention training and I believe Supervisor Hartman on Monday asked, Dr. Lee what happens? So so the team comes in response to your house to your incident what happens? I can answer that question because I've had it happen at my home several times and this is exactly what happens My family member was in had very much decompensated.

It was a nightmare to say the least this is a year ago last Christmas. I called 9 on one The sheriff responded, they were CIT trained. They took the incident from a nightmare to zero, to nothing. My family member ended up staying at home not going to jail so no jail costs to the county that's a success. So not only is success financially but it's success for me and for my family member.

And as far as the, I was going to mention AOT on Monday but I thought I'd save my comments for the one three minute thing instead of two three minute periods. The AOT program which my family member is in now is also a successful program. And every day, my family member seems to be getting better and better. So in the future when you have questions about any of these programs just give me a ring. I am an expert and I'm happy to share any information I have so thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:49:29 · ≈ 10:49 AM

Next speaker is Rob Kirsch to be followed by Julie Hess

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:33 · ≈ 10:49 AM

And I can just say that in the 2 years. I was there he has spectacular attendance record at the behavioral wellness Commission and participation so you would be a good reputable source.

CommentJulie HessProposed1:49:46 · ≈ 10:49 AM

Mister chair members of the board. I'm here today on behalf of the men and women of the sheriff's office, the men and women who walk the halls of the jail every day patrol the streets and answer the 911 calls obviously We've been talking about staffing and I think that's the number one issue that continues to face the sheriff's office today. We talk about retention, that's somewhat more of a complex issue than just hiring people. I was at a conference last week and it was a statewide conference Law enforcement applicants are down 63% across the state.

So with that said, we need to try to keep the men and women that we do hire. So part of that is getting rid of mandatory overtime. Although it's gone down, we still have mandatory overtime in the jail And a dispatch. So with that being said, we're asking for your guys' support in giving us the funding we need to adequately staff our jails, patrol and dispatch.

I'll leave it at that. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:55 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Our next speaker is Julie Hess to be followed by Tony Fox.

CommentJulie HessProposed1:51:05 · ≈ 10:51 AM

Good morning. I come to you again as a hopeful mother and concerned citizen. I would like to ask that, as you progress through these budget workshops, to please think of what positive impact you could make for people with mental health issues. Then think of monies that would be saved in the courts and the jails. Do you know what it would look like? It would look like Dr. Lee moving forward with her wonderful work and leadership.

Already, the co-response team has proven itself by making relationships with the public and with law enforcement. And by deescalating situations and not having to take people to jail. Also, the eight hour and 40 hour crisis intervention training has helped the community by having officers that can be more effective in their jobs. Also the AOT. We need programs that help individuals be their best self, starting with wellness beds not jail beds. Getting individuals restored stable and able to live a more productive life.

Jail is not meant to be a place of healing for individuals with mental illness however that is where we put them. Then we release them right back onto the streets into the same environment they failed in. Without help and programs, this is not going to promote a positive outcome. The time I spent trying to find help for my son has been a roller coaster ride in the dark. Ups, downs, blind corners and hope.

1:52 – 1:588 turns

CommentTony FoxProposed1:52:49 · ≈ 10:52 AM

Hope for our loved ones. Hope for more beds. Hope for understanding, hope for other families that won't have to sit in the dark and cry. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:12 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Our next speaker is Tony Fox to be followed by Marion McKenzie.

CommentTony FoxProposed1:53:20 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Hello, I was here last year at this time asking for CIT to be funded and now with the co-response team very happy to hear about that. I'm here because I wondered if this terrible jail we have in Santa Barbara that's dirty and pretty sickening could be gutted. I am a designer so I kind of look at it that way Could it be gutted and then have a facility for our mentally ill?

We have to ship our loved ones out to Los Angeles, Pasadena, Ventura. We have nothing here with a proper facility. And I find Santa Barbara, it's just odd to me that we live like this. My son if you'll recall, I don't think you were here as a board member was, we called 911 for help. We asked for trained officers and cares to come to our house. Our son has schizophrenia and he was in a downward spiral.

And we were having a birthday party for another son. Uh, the 9-1-1 people sent untrained officers three of them and they never called cares. They came into our house. I let them in and I shouldn't have now. I realize they thought they could handle my son and my son ended up very frightfully jumping on a chair and asking them if they wanted to shoot him or fight him.

One of the officers said, get off the chair and I will fight you. That was not in the police report after they arrested him. It is on the audio. They lied and he was put into, they took him, they tased him four times. And one of the officers, I think it was Officer Vandepole kicked him harshly in the knee. They took him to the hospital to check have an EKG done.

And he passed, so they took him to jail instead of here they were at the hospital. They could have called cares and they should have had his knee looked at. Brent was in jail for four and a half months for this incident. He got worse and worse and worse. And every time I went every week, his father and I, he showed us his knee and it was swollen and large. When he, there was a Judge Duffy from San Luis Obispo County that demanded that he be sent to a hospital. Because Brent looked-

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.871:56:11 · ≈ 10:56 AM

Ma'am we're going to have to have you wrap up. I'm sorry it's-

CommentTony FoxProposed1:56:14 · ≈ 10:56 AM

All right well okay fine all I want to do is say that officer fractured his knee and tore his ACL. And when he got out of jail, he went to Atascadero four and a half months so it was nine months he lost of his life Now he had emergency surgery, and he has a brace and crutches. And it'll be another nine months for his restoration. So all I'm saying is don't...and none of the jailers knew anything about mental illness. So I'm hoping that Ms. Lee, Dr. Lee will get to them as well. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:56:50 · ≈ 10:56 AM

Our next speaker is Marion McKenzie to be followed by Gwen Marcus.

CommentMarion McKenzieProposed1:56:58 · ≈ 10:56 AM

Good morning Mr. Chair, Supervisors thank you for letting me have the opportunity to speak to this morning I'm hoping that you will fund the CIT pilot program fully because this is a issue that's very dear to my heart I know that seems kind of strange but like many of our family members here the CIT trained officers have made an enormous impact in our lives They have arrived at our house when things were stressful.

They've calmed things, they have turned the situation on a dime especially when my family was very frightened When anyone requests a CIT-trained officer, there's more of a likelihood of understanding that our loved one's delusions are real. They cannot be argued or dismissed away but they need to be respected and acknowledged. The officer may not see that green demon in the corner but it's there to our loved ones with mental illness.

My intelligent, beautiful marathon running son could have easily have been just like Russ Spencer who possibly laid himself down on the 101 freeway last month. Luckily two years ago my son was also on the freeway but a fireman talked him off We need to have all of our officers CIT trained, not just some of them. The one time that I did not request a CIT officer to my home was when I was burglarized recently during the evacuations.

I didn't think I needed a CIT officer then but the officer that showed up repeatedly tried to blame my son with his mental illness for the theft. Misconceptions always have horrible consequences. Thank you for listening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:50 · ≈ 10:58 AM

Our next speaker is Gwen Marcus to be followed by Lynn Gibbs.

1:59 – 2:1814 turns

CommentGwen MarcusProposedself-stated1:59:08 · ≈ 10:59 AM

Hello, thank you for letting me speak my name is Gwen Marcus I moved to Santa Barbara in 1980 to go to college and have been here ever since. Got married, bought a house, had a kid. My child is now 26 years old and I have had to make use of some of the services that were discussed today. And so I'm here to encourage you, they were so successful, to encourage you to continue to fund or ideally permanently fund the crisis intervention training and the co-response teams I want to let you guys know, since everything's been so general. I want to tell you my personal experience with the CIT officers.

My son started using drugs heavily when he was 14 and at 26 he is still a substance abuser somewhere in that period of time he also developed a mental illness. And we've been dealing with it now for 12 years. And I've been too afraid to call law enforcement because I've seen on television, read in news reports about mentally ill people acting strange and so law enforcement shoots them.

And a lot of people with mentally ill relatives feel this way. We're very afraid of calling law enforcement. And then I took the NAMI class and I am now a NAMIMember. And they informed us about the CIT officers, and so we decided to take the risk because my son is somewhat violent towards us and destructive of property, and we called 911. Specifically asked for the crisis intervention trained officers.

And just to let you know how effective it is, it was really amazing to me. The dispatcher kept me on the line asking questions I responded so they knew what they were walking into and finally she said, You can go outside now there there I went out there was no one there. And an officer was turning the corner, coming all by himself. No sirens, no cars, no nothing.

So as not to escalate the situation we talked a little bit. He realized he could bring the cars and I said my son will come out, he'll be peaceful with you guys. And his officers talked to my son for probably 45 minutes before the co-response team, before the therapist came to evaluate him. And they established a wonderful rapport. They were wonderful, their goal was clearly not to escalate.

We've called them back several times since they have been absolutely phenomenal. Please continue to fund it. Please fund it permanently. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:01:59 · ≈ 11:01 AM

And our final speaker is Lynn Gibbs.

CommentLynn GibbsProposed2:02:07 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Chair Lavanino and supervisors, I serve as NAMI's rep on the community corrections input group for jail medical and mental health care. And one of NAMIs priorities was to Improve the intersection for people who are coming into the jail so that they can continue their anti-psychotic or other mental health medications when they get to the jail, or get back on them when they need to. And there's been a vast improvement there. So I wanted to say that the sheriff mentioned The investment that you made in jail mental health care and we see that really paying off.

The new psychiatrist at the jail, Dr. Hakeem is pretty amazing and he's done thorough assessments for people to make sure they're on the right medications. And I asked him how is it that people Decide to voluntarily take medication in the jail, and he said it's because they feel so much better. And they hear that from other people. So that's been a real success.

And now we need to focus on the intersection when people come out of the jail. In too many cases it's taking too long For people to get an appointment on the outside, to continue their care and to continue their medication. And I think that, I expect that AB 1810, Will give us an opportunity to focus in on that area, because we want to take advantage of the investment we've made in the jail and the help that people are getting. And when they come out of the jail, they need to be able to connect almost immediately. To care on the outside, so that they continue their recovery and they don't come back to the jail again.

So I just wanted to mention that as a piece that we're committed to working on too. So thank you. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:04:31 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Lynn was our final speaker.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:04:33 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Well once again, I just want to thank those who came out and gave their personal stories. I know it's not easy to do. It really does help us as decision makers. It's difficult to find resources, but at least when you feel like you're funding something and you hear that it's working, it makes it a heck of a lot easier to continue the funding. The one question I had is so most of you know you're a NAMI member or you know that when you call 911, you're going to ask for a CIT officer.

Dispatchers trained or how do they know if the person that's calling that doesn't know about. That we do have officers that are CIT trained, how do we get those people to show up? And how do we know how that portion of that first step works? Or how do we get the information to the rest of the public I guess as well?

CommentCheryl Lynn LeeProposedself-stated2:05:29 · ≈ 11:05 AM

Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I'm happy to answer that question and any other questions you might have. All of our dispatchers... You might

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:05:34 · ≈ 11:05 AM

want to tell everybody who you are

CommentCheryl Lynn LeeProposedself-stated2:05:36 · ≈ 11:05 AM

because we know who you are. Oh right. Hi, I'm Cheryl Lynn Lee, formerly known as Dr. Lee. Okay. So all of our dispatchers have also received CIT training either the 8-hour or 40-hour training. They've also received additional training in how to deescalate suicidal callers while on the phone so they're well aware of all of the training that the deputies have also received

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:05:59 · ≈ 11:05 AM

Perfect. So when somebody calls in a matter, I mean if they can tell it's a crisis situation they will dispatch CIT officers?

CommentCheryl Lynn LeeProposedself-stated2:06:05 · ≈ 11:06 AM

Correct. Many of our dispatchers also handle some of these calls for service without having to dispatch deputies so they have a direct line of communication with myself and we can problem solve before deputies are dispatched if that's the appropriate thing to do.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:06:19 · ≈ 11:06 AM

Perfect. Okay. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:06:22 · ≈ 11:06 AM

I was just looking at one of our dispatchers and giving an, at a gal because that's really the best technique is in some of these cases we can deescalate even without a black. We don't really have black and whites but without a car going out. The stories are so moving to me that people share. I can't help but see my own wife's little brother in his face, and what a sea of tough calls and difficult paths this is.

Just a few years back he was Super energetic young man with a lot. of possibilities in his life, and a little bit of mental illness and unwillingness to see substance abuse problems combine to sort of deteriorate more and more. And every time when you have a family member in the midst of this, every time the typical thought before you are aware of their mental illness is they've got to be ready to get help. And then every time you go God, this must be rock bottom when they're kicked out of the house, when they're kicked out of college, when they're on the street first time they go to jail and well, they gotta realize that's rock bottom at this point.

Something about either that substance dependence or something about that mental illness caused them not to see it. And so I just want to say that If there's things that have gone wrong, I want to express this board's commitment. And I think I can say this on behalf of the board that we are very committed to improving this system. I think the men and women in the Sheriff's Department are enormously committed to improving this system. And the men and women of the Behavioral Wellness Department are enormously committed to improving this system.

But I don't think the system was set up right. And we're sort of trying to remake something that wasn't set up for how to prevent people from further deteriorating because, I don' know whether it was the time on the street. Harder drugs. I don't know whether it was the time in jail or all three, but you know you. In just a few years time, you have a young man with the world and.

In front of him and then you have. A man who's aged horribly and in a short amount of time who? Who basically needs his mother for everything? And who will never And so you have our commitment. Supervisor Hartman?

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:10:10 · ≈ 11:10 AM

Thank you. I would just like to give a call out to NAMI. You've taken wrenching family tragedies and pulled people together, and given us constructive steps to take to better deal with everybody in our county. And so I'm very, very appreciative. We have pretty regular emails and visits, and I've been tremendously educated in that process. And I hear what you're saying about and would like to explore further when people come out of the jail, how do we make sure that they don't relapse? And so as we meet in the future with various department heads, we'll be exploring that. Try to come back with a better answer by the time we get to our budget hearings.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:11:03 · ≈ 11:11 AM

And also as part of public comment, another thing I heard that I'd like to see part of the June breakdown is in the Sheriff's Department on the mandatory overtime. Where have we been? Where are we currently and how many bodies would it take to move off a mandatory overtime? Okay, well I think that ends the Sheriff's Department. So that was item one. Yes, but a big chunk of our budget. So here's what we're going to do for agenda management. Again, lunch is being delivered at noon so we will break at 12. We'll see where we get and then we'll break at 12 and at 12 we'll determine how long that break is gonna be. Next up is Tracy Makuga in the Public Defender's Office.

And you might want to hold just a minute because we lost some members All right, let's take a five minute break. We'll all take a little break you. You. OK. Just a second.

2:18 – 2:427 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:15 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Lunches in 45 minutes

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:18:17 · ≈ 11:18 AM

half is for you. Yeah evil temptress stay away from me. All right. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:24 · ≈ 11:18 AM

good.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:18:28 · ≈ 11:18 AM

That's right. Okay. We will reconvene and Tracy McCougar, Public Defender will start her presentation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:18:41 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Good morning Chairman Lavagnino, members of the board, Madam CEO. First I'd like to apologize for my voice. I unfortunately came down with a pre-budget chest cold. So if I occasionally hack or have to stop, I do apologize.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:18:56 · ≈ 11:18 AM

I'd always love that good timing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:18:58 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Yeah, yeah the sympathy sickness right? This year the Santa Barbara Public Defender's Office is celebrating 50 years of serving our community and defending the Central Coast What's amazing to me as a person of a certain vintage, which means I've been around for a long time is not only how much things have changed in those 50 years but also how it continues to rapidly change.

Which goes to the heart of our key challenges and emerging issues. When we opened our doors back in 1969, we kept all of our records in leather-bound ledgers and on index cards. Now virtually everything we need can be found in a laptop, is accessible through our mobile phone and stored in a mysterious cloud that Deepak promises he'll explain to me someday. Paper is being replaced by digital discovery.

Most evidence in criminal cases have a digital component from body cams to home video, cell phone tower data to mobile phone extractions. Public safety as a group is facing a tsunami of complexity and cost. Our county not only needs to urgently invest in IT infrastructure, but also our current criminal justice approach on this particular issue of isolation and silos isn't working.

Addressing the issue on a collective level, pooling resources together to combat the tsunami is the solution. There's other things that haven't changed, and that's the constitutional right to be protected and have a lawyer when you can't afford one. And a right to fair public and speedy trial when a member of our community is accused of a crime. But the right to an attorney, what it means to have an effective and competent attorney has vastly expanded and has made the practice of law much more complex than when I started 27 years ago.

Now to be effective and competent entails so much more than simply advising our clients what the charges are against them, the risks of trial or the pros and cons of a plea. To be effective and competent is more than simply getting a client a good deal or winning a trial. We have to be knowledgeable and be able to advise our clients in areas of family law, child custody issues, immigration, benefits, employment law. We have to understand DMV rules and licensing restrictions. All of these things can be impacted by a criminal conviction.

When an individual is charged with a crime the collateral consequences of that conviction are significant and often life-altering. As defenders, we have a duty to advise our clients of all those collateral consequences so our clients can make informed decisions. And it seems each year the legislature, the Supreme Court, the appellate courts expand our duties as defenders and responsibilities with this year being no exception.

The most prominent and impactful being mental health diversion. I believe this is true in part because our legislature and courts recognize that often more than one's liberty is at stake when someone is convicted of a crime. They also understand that there are a host of reasons why individuals become justice involved. For example, in the United States one in three people have criminal records, arrests or convictions that appear on routine background checks.

That means approximately 70 million people are left out of the workforce or underemployed. They're unable to get student loans, to secure housing or obtain a professional license. These collateral consequences have a compounding effect, rippling through families communities and our local economy. The belief that a misdemeanor arrest or conviction is insignificant after all it's only a misdemeanor could be nothing farther from the truth Being arrested and spending even a few days in jail or being subjected to pretrial incarceration when you do not pose a threat to public safety, but simply because you cannot afford bail has a catastrophic effect rippling through families communities and our local economy.

Fines and fees harnessed to a client who suffers a misdemeanor conviction, even for the most minor of offenses and which have nothing to do with victim restitution can mean the difference between putting food on a table, gas in your car or keeping a roof over one's head. Fines and fees have a devastating impact rippling through families, communities and our local economy.

Defenses have also become more complex and they require an understanding of neuroscience, complex trauma and a laundry list of forensic disciplines that often require costly expert consultations. Each and every one of these changes have had a palpable impact on our workload, and our budgetary needs. The legislature and the courts continue to recognize that our clients are complex.

A significant number suffer from mental health issues and substance abuse disorders. These illnesses were misunderstood 50 years ago, and quite frankly when I started practicing 27 years Today we understand that mental illness and substance abuse are medical problems and a public health crisis, not a character defect that our dad told us that Uncle Bob suffered from at the dinner table.

In response to the challenges and emerging issues, we appointed a training director to help us with career development. We recruited a widely respected trainer with a statewide and national reputation for excellence to fill the position. Over this past year, she has begun to build a robust in-house training program including a new higher immersion training, a wellness program, partnered with leaders in the field like the National Public Defenders Association, forged relationships with organizations like Gideon's Promise and strengthened our relationship with our local law school to offer trainings in order to recruit, retain, empower a 21st century law office and community.

Public defenders however have seen families destroyed and whole neighborhoods collapsed under the weight of poverty, the devastating effects of mass incarceration that resulted from years of tough on crime policies. Rhetoric that sparked fear, aggressive policing to fuel distrust and over supervision practices then increased the likelihood of failure rather than success.

Fortunately, we've learned much over those 50 years thanks to rigorous unbiased studies and a dramatic shift toward data-driven decisions and evidence based practices. As a result our communities are safer and stronger and has also led to huge savings in the ability for local government to redirect funding to long overdue projects and invest precious tax dollars in our local economy so businesses can thrive and private sectors jobs created One of the shining examples of this is Chief Heitman and her extraordinary team, who continue to lead the way with impressive data and the adoption of evidence-based practices without compromising public safety.

As a community, we can no longer afford to ignore trends and studies. We cannot afford not to ask the tough questions and demand answers and demand data. We certainly cannot rationally solve problems anecdotally or in silos or without transparency. So I would like to start by asking a few of those tough questions and highlight two innovative and promising programs to reduce our pretrial incarceration rates, reduce recidivism, and make our communities safer and stronger which makes up the basis of our current budget expansion.

Nationally, statewide, and locally crime is down especially and thankfully violent crime Yet, as you all pointed out today, as did Sheriff Brown, our jail remains full with a large number of individuals presumed innocent waiting for their day in court. Many of whom simply cannot afford bail and many of whom are suffering from mental illness or hobbled by addiction and are not a threat to public safety. Why?

Crime is down and criminal filings are at historic lows, yet our courts are congested with both victims and defendants waiting for their day in court. Justice remains delayed and denied. Why? Crime is down but prosecutors, probation officers, and defender caseloads are up. Why? I would like to suggest to you that the answers to these questions can be found in our incarceration story and it is time to change the narrative Our incarceration story is a mirror that reflects how well our local justice system is functioning.

High pretrial incarceration rates is a reflection that something is wrong and a call to do better. Lengthy delays from the point in time a person is charged with a felony to when the case goes to a preliminary hearing or goes to trial, or simply resolves, is a reflection that something is wrong and a call to do better. A system where individuals plead for daylight to get out of jail so they don't lose their jobs or the housing.

Waiting for their day in court is a reflection that something is wrong and a call to do better. Our incarceration story reflects the decisions of our legislators, of law enforcement, of prosecutors, of judges and yes each of us Everything from the cascade of criminal justice reforms that we are navigating to local law enforcement arresting decisions, to charging decisions and sentencing recommendations by local prosecuting agencies.

To the absence of meaningful pre-booking and post booking diversion programs for offenders. The absence of robust alternative sentencing options. to the delay of receiving discovery, to the culture of delay and to the fundamental unfairness of money bail. Each and every one of these things and much more impact our incarceration story. Our incarceration story is important because the fiscal cost of criminal justice in especially jails are high As we stare down the list of deferred projects, aging infrastructure and debate the renovation of the main jail and face the inevitable headwinds of future recessions there is no better time to examine our incarceration story. And there is no better time to change the narrative.

Our incarceration story starts with recognizing that the vast majority of individuals arrested and charged with crimes are our neighbors and members of our community People do bad things and make mistakes, but not all people are bad. In fact it's the exact opposite of the dangerous rhetoric that led to mass incarceration. It is recognizing that the folks in our jails, the folks who are charged with a crime and are not fortunate enough to be out of custody, and the kids in our juvenile hall are not the other but often the familiar.

More often than not, they are our neighbor's child or our brother's mother or sister or uncle Bob. The next most important part of our incarceration story is that the majority of charges filed in Santa Barbara County are nonviolent. Misdemeanor cases make up the majority of our criminal docket. The majority of cases filed in Santa Barbara County are nonviolent misdemeanors Lastly, our incarceration story is full of promise and hope because of leadership demonstrated by our CEO's office, Sheriff Brown, Dr. Gleckhohn, and the ongoing strategic collaborations of your public safety leaders to address issues like mental illness in our jails.

To quote Assistant CEO Barney Melekian from his presentation on Monday on mental health he said humbly I think we are making a difference I would say, I know we are making a difference. Together we have started to change the narrative on mental illness in our jail. The things that have made a difference are things like co-response and CIT and AOT which I urge each of you to support.

Law enforcement desperately needs this power tool to assist the mentally ill rather than arrest the mentally ill. I urge you to support Sheriff's Brown request to fund Dr. Lee's position, which is a key component to continue to change the narrative on mental illness in our jail. But now it's time to apply the same type of strategic collaborations to better understand and then address our pretrial incarceration problem and change the narrative together.

Downsizing jail populations is no easy task, and I'm not here to suggest that we should open the floodgates But I do not think it's an unreasonable goal when you understand our incarceration story that we can do better and change that narrative. It requires collaboration by all of public safety, all of whom have different priorities and perspectives but I am confident we can reach common ground Addressing high pre-trial incarceration rates is a national, state and local question which has taken on a greater urgency not only because of the human toll especially in communities of color but also the economic toll.

The offend repeat revolving doors of financial drain with very little return on investment. Our budget expansion is twofold and both related to one another The expansions are both investments, both promise a significant return and cost savings to the county. Both are supported by strong research and strong partners. Both go hand in hand with the goals of reducing our pretrial population and reducing recidivism.

Holistic defense and early representation are innovative but not novel. Both are a result of strong collaborations, one with Family Services Agency and the other with our Sheriff in Behavioral Wellness. Both have been tested, practiced, studied in other jurisdictions. Holistic defense became a reality in our county as a result of the vision and passion of Family Services Agency who is one of the most effective and respected nonprofits in our county.

Their core mission, and I quote is to strengthen and advocate for families and individuals of all ages and diversities helping to create and preserve a healthy community. FSA wisely recognized that holistic defense was another tool in the toolbox to make a difference in our community. Holistic defense was grant funded as part of a research project given the success of the pilot project. The partnership has been extended to serve more clients than the scope of the original grant.

I would like to explain to you briefly what holistic defense is and why the county should support FSA and the Public Defenders Partnership. First and foremost, it's cost effective and represents the power of public and private partnerships to solve problems. Government cannot always be the solution. Secondly, the data supports significant cost savings associated with holistic defense. And very importantly, a holistic defense model can meaningfully change the narrative of a client's life.

Holistic defense doesn't change the fundamental role of a public defender. We still protect and defend. However, after years of seeing clients recycle through the system, hopelessly stuck in the offend-and-repeat revolving door destined to do a life sentence on the installment plan, holistic defense started a revolution with the premise that we as defenders, we as a community should all advocate and fight for better life outcomes for the justice involved. to help them break down the barriers to successful reentry into our community.

The ultimate goal of holistic defense is to make a long-term difference in a client's life. It's a team model that draws on the incredible power of our community based organizations, pro bono resources, highly skilled trained advocates to address legal and non-legal impediments to success. As you may know My spouse is an entrepreneur and has been in cancer research as long as I've been a public defender.

So, I often compare holistic defense to the revolution of personalized medicine. As she explained to me when she was undergoing treatment herself for ovarian cancer, I asked her the simple question, why are you getting chemo? Does it work and will it help? She told me that cancer treatments for a long time were one size fits all. You treated every cancer patient the same, and you threw the same chemotherapy at every tumor and hoped it would work.

She said it was like blowing up a house when all you wanted to do is turn the lights off. This is true in many instances with clients in the criminal justice system where one-size-fits-all cookie cutter approaches are still prevalent and ineffective. For example, all domestic violence offenders are ordered to do the same program without addressing the whole person, the family and all the circumstances that contributed to that criminal behavior.

As in personalized medicine and targeted treatment for cancer where cures now happen and prolonged remissions are common, the same individualized approach and evidence-based practices with personalized pretrial and reentry plans are key to reducing recidivism and making our communities safer and stronger. As we now know, the same blow-the-house-up approach represented by overprogramming or harsh sentences led to mass incarceration and often lead to an offender to increase his criminality and be programmed to reoffend.

Holistic defense is an important partner in crafting successful pretrial release plans, diversion plans, and post-release plans. As a critical partnership with all of our public safety members, including probation and behavioral wellness in the sheriff. Many of our criminally justice involved clients suffer from severe mental illness and chronic and untreated health conditions and unlike cancer.

And unlike cancer patients who receive sympathy and are seen by the community as someone to support, the justice-involved client who lost the genetic lottery or doesn't have the resources to receive medical care are seen differently. A key component of holistic defense is a fundamental understanding that many of our clients need compassion, support and assistance in a world that is much more complex when you're mentally ill or physically ill.

If that hasn't convinced you to support FSA in our partnership, you should read the RAND study. It was recently released, a 10-year study, the largest of its kind and you'll see the value of holistic defense. One of the studies' findings was holistic representation in New York resulted at 1.1 million fewer days behind bars. About 4500 people who would have otherwise gone to jail avoided jail completely saving New York $160 million on inmate housing alone.

That should give us pause, that should give us hope. In our own local study we were able to demonstrate a $250,000 savings in reduced incarceration and the clients who received holistic defense services are thriving. Part of our holistic defense is our early representation model called Pre-Arraignment Unit, affectionately referred to as POW. POW is the gateway to Holistic Defense Services and engagement with our Community Defender Division.

As a result of our collaboration with our Sheriff and Behavioral Wellness, POW is allowed to meet with clients at the earliest feasible time after they've been taken into custody. We do so in order to collect information about their background, assess their needs and facilitate the earliest connection with community services to plan the reentry. POW also collects social history and contacts employers and family members so litigating defenders can liaison with pretrial services and provide critical information to the district attorney in the court when deciding whether to release someone.

Our Community Defender Division is one of our proudest accomplishments this year and it's the foundation of our 50-year vision of our office, rooted in our fundamental belief in a holistic approach to address complex client needs. Similar models of early representation have been studied In Washington, Florida, New York, Contra Costa, San Francisco. The importance of this early representation has been demonstrated repeatedly. Studies show that people who receive early representation spend less time in jail.

They're more likely to be released and when money bond is set they have lower accounts. For example, in Yakima County Washington pre-trial release rates increased from 53% to 73%, with absolutely no impact on public safety. 20% more people got out, got back to their families, to their jobs. In San Francisco in the first five months of their pretrial release unit they were able to cut jail beds by 4,689 saving the city in five months approximately $800,000 in incarceration costs.

Our early representation model was created to address pre-trial incarceration, but also to serve as an intercept point for our early identification of mental health issues in line with the principles of Stepping Up Initiative led by Sheriff Brown and in collaboration again with Behavioral Wellness. If we're going to change the narrative on pre-trial incarceration, recidivism, and address mental illness in our jail, holistic defense and early representation are powerful tools to have in the toolbox.

So it was last year, I did not go through every slide and I'm not going to go over every slide this time again because I think everyone's pretty familiar with our budget. I just want to highlight a few things about it as we end the presentation which is one because of a holistic defense we increased our CCP revenue from the Community Correction Partnership because they also recognize the power of holistic defense Our vision of strong private and public partnerships to provide services has been expanded to include Silicon Valley tech firm, Code for America and other nonprofits like National Legal Aid, Defender Association in UC Davis.

Many organizations in today's economy have to do more with less, and we've taken that to heart. But also because we want to improve efficiency and process. And so we've become leaner. So our administrative costs have gone down when many other organizations' administrative costs go up. So before I answer any questions that you may have, I'd like to challenge us to change our incarceration narrative by asking what we can do differently between now and next June. To combat systemic issues, to improve our incarceration story so it does not include lengthy delays or pre-trial incarceration that is absent of reason other than the inability to afford bail.

I would like to challenge us to change our incarceration narrative by supporting the things we know work Thank you.

2:42 – 2:489 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:42:37 · ≈ 11:42 AM

Thank you very much to bring it to the board for questions.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:42:58 · ≈ 11:42 AM

The long-term problem. It's not only, I mean it, I don't like to dehumanize it because obviously you put a human face on it and I appreciate that but to me it goes far beyond whether you're sympathetic for the justice involved or whether you're not sympathetic for the justice involved. For me it's about targeting resources where we need it the most and to me that's That's at the higher level of crime.

And so I really appreciate your big picture thinking on it. If we can find the money to do these things, it would be useful for me ongoing and this goes for the other public safety departments too is to always try to quantify why we think That change down the line is saving us money. I know that's not always easy to do but it's when there is a lot more needs than there are funds available.

But it makes it a little bit easier if you have some sense of what things can put it on a path for sustainability and what things aren't, so that's just a request as we go forward. If we do manage to do this I hope that the report next year or the following year will have the results.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:44:46 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:44:51 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Didn't I hear you already describe some cost savings from the study of holistic defense already? Yeah, New York.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:45:02 · ≈ 11:45 AM

No, she had a study here! Yes so to fill the board in on this we partnered with FSA and UC Berkeley researcher and that's where it was funded The paper is under review and it's being peer reviewed. We've seen it, we've seen the data, we've collected. It was a big part of the grant to collect that data. But again, and it goes to your point earlier, Supervisor Williams, is that really save costs with the jail. It's not just reducing the jail population but the building has to be open, has to be there. It really having a long term vision of reducing pre-trial incarceration long term.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:45:42 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Well then I revise my statements to be even more supportive of the idea that you are willing to have a researcher look under the hood at your operations and departments because I know plenty of people who just be like, hey we save money this way. And don't have anybody so to have that try to be Legitimized and peer-reviewed is also helpful for us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:46:06 · ≈ 11:46 AM

We have very sound data that's being published on this, and the RAND study is another thing but we have our own data. And we're also in the process of writing another grant with FSA seeking additional funding for a holistic defense that's going to be a larger study.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:46:22 · ≈ 11:46 AM

And just to follow up could you just summarize some of the pre arraignment cost savings that and what it means to somebody's family to have that. Service

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:46:34 · ≈ 11:46 AM

I think this the narrative that I wanted to share is is that in it is that and I agree there are And I'm now being recorded in saying this, there are bad people that need to be in jail. And there are people who do serious crimes and Sheriff Brown's jail has a lot of inmates that are facing very serious charges having done very serious things. That's what a local jail is for, in my opinion. And have had to absorb other things that the state have imposed on us. But the people that we see every single day in arraignment court, a lot of the people that Sheriff Brown points out that he has no choice but to arrest for example on old warrants are hardworking folk that have jobs. They're individuals that are doing things in our community that are good.

They are people that are hard working people and when they go in jail for a couple days they lose their jobs. They lose their benefits, that happens all the time. And the problem with pretrial incarceration in this county in my opinion is that the people that are in jail that are not on the most serious offenses and I can tell you right now in my office we have 34 pending cases that a client is facing a life charge.

The rest of our cases are not people who are looking at spending the rest of their life in prison. So when you graduate that down and you look at what the population is, you're talking about people with drug offenses and property offenses that have the absolute ability to be rehabilitated Absolutely have the ability to go out and be safely in our community, but are denied so by the fact that they can't afford bail. So to have it in our heads that everybody in that jail who's a felon belongs there and should stay there while their pending trial is an erroneous assumption.

And it's the delay that's happening in the courts that's causing that. And I agree with Sheriff Brown, I mean we're agreeing on a lot today is I agree with Sheriff Brown that he has the least control of what's happening in this issue. This is a DA court public defender issue that needs to be addressed.

2:48 – 2:5611 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:48:48 · ≈ 11:48 AM

Is it being addressed?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:48:50 · ≈ 11:48 AM

I we've been talking about this since this last year and we continue to work. I mean there are there lots of issues for example, we adopted a model continuance policy but they're still issues with discovery. I think that when I was referring to these bigger issues that were addressing the silos or as individuals these are the issues that we need to be sitting down really talking about how are we going to get all this information that the sheriff in his law enforcement agencies And other agencies have to transmit to the DA and seamlessly give it to the defense agencies to represent the clients. So yes, it's being talked about. Do I think we've made enough progress? Absolutely not. Do you think it's a huge problem still? Absolutely.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:49:36 · ≈ 11:49 AM

If I might continue, well I'm very supportive of your budget requests. My earlier life was an academic. I praise the foot patrol because they see an educational mission in Isla Vista and really I share your enthusiasm for Chief Heitman and I share that for your presentation as well because you're doing We're not just operating on tradition, we're trying to learn and improve.

And I think you're doing it certainly in the Public Defender's Office. I use holistic defense as the premier example of Renew 2022 and the benefits that come from collaborating across different departments, but now I appreciate how much it is working with the nonprofit sector as well and engaging our entire community to address some of these issues. So what I'm most interested in is where do we go next?

You've addressed resources within your department, but what can we do up here to support what you think we need for the collaboration across criminal justice departments.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:51:00 · ≈ 11:51 AM

Well, I think you've already done it in many ways. And quite frankly, I'm really proud of our public safety group. I think we have great strong relationships and collaborations that continue to just grow. I think putting and picking Barney Malekian as the assistant CEO has been a game changer in many ways because he has the ability put us in rooms and have conversations that are much deeper than we've had before. And I think we still have to go down that road, and you know, I appreciated what Chairman Lavinino said after, I think it was after behavioral wellness where he said you didn't like those big ten year plans because, and that you have to do things incrementally? We are doing those things and we are moving incrementally, and we can't solve all these problems at once.

But I am so proud of what we have done and what we have accomplished. And I feel greater hope than I have felt in a long time because when I've seen with Sheriff Brown's leadership On the mental health front in the jails and Alice Gleckhorn's leadership. And really pushing for the things that the community has been asking for a long time, and now they're being funded. We've made progress because of your leadership, you're giving us these kind of directions. And as far as where we are in the courts to alleviate some of these pressures?

I think there has to be a meaningful summit to discuss these things and really address how very common sense, in a common sense way we can solve these problems.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.832:52:29 · ≈ 11:52 AM

So is that the next incremental step?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:52:32 · ≈ 11:52 AM

I hope so. I think it's been talked about and suggested and I think you know we have been in work groups talking about some of the issues but we need more movement. We need more movement

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:52:46 · ≈ 11:52 AM

Got it. Supervisor

GuestHartProposed · by introduction2:52:47 · ≈ 11:52 AM

Hart and then Supervisor Williams. Well, I'm really excited about this and enthusiastic too. And I share your optimism about incremental progress. I think that is the way things happen. And I think that one way that we might be able to bring some additional spotlight to this issue is by having a regular report on the progress of the working group coming bringing that information back to the board periodically so that we can see How that incremental progress is translating into change, an incremental change.

And obviously I support your additional funding request. I think it's critical to invest in the projects and programs that are making a difference. And I am a big fan of your collaborative leadership style and the fact that you've given credit to Sheriff Brown. Chief Heitman and the other public safety working group members that you're working with shows that this is not about one department versus another. In fact, ideally in the future a joint presentation from all the departments involved in this issue would be a really great way to highlight the fact that this is a collaborative model that needs Cooperative work effort to be successful, but but I am a big supporter and enthusiastic Backer of your request

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:54:08 · ≈ 11:54 AM

Supervisor Williams. Well, I would nominate this for the special presentation for next year You know, I think a lot of the You know a lot of the dialogue between the sheriff and myself is also very I'm going to talk about a couple of things. Number one, getting around the edges of this core issue which is time to trial has a lot of downsides. Number one, the downside of cost we've already talked Certainty of punishment and timeliness of punishment are very important factors in deterrence. And I feel like we lose a little bit with both of those.

The other is that The other downside, of course, is that it was already indicated by the public defender but I just want to make it more in plain English. You know if you have people who end up being innocent that spent 10 months jail or even just a few days and lose their job then that's a loss from our community. That's a loss for them and that's a loss for our economy so I feel like we have some talented people running these departments, and in the courts. And I feel like if you guys really work together to try to get at this We could improve the situation and that would have dividends for the system that we could use to really target on the most important parts of our justice system. And so I just ask this as a call or take the opportunity for your call to ask that this be a real priority for all those departments.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.872:56:30 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Great, awesome definitely support Your initiatives and I'm sure by listening to the comments that we received up here that well-received and we really appreciate the move forward in the change forwards. With that, we are going to break until 1 o'clock and we'll be back with public comment was there a public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:56:55 · ≈ 11:56 AM

Chair Leveny, no members of the board we have one request to speak and that's Andy Caldwell.

2:57 – 3:002 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:57:05 · ≈ 11:57 AM

Well, I'm glad she's a public defender and not a district attorney based on what I got to say. Anyway, we appreciate having a bulldog in this office because there is a constitutional right for people to have representation. And we agree that the system can evolve and can improve and that people shouldn't linger in jail who end up being innocent. But having said all that, One of the things that bugged the heck out of me is on slide, I don't know what slide this is. It's under their summary.

This is how they couch their job when clients' lives intersect with the criminal and juvenile justice system. Clients' lives are intersecting. No, their client committed a felony They either murdered somebody, attempted murder or they stole assault and battery. These people are not the victims. They may be victims in their life overall in some way shape or form but they've made somebody else a victim by committing a crime.

And I hate the soft touch that looks at these people through this keyhole that they are victims. Because we all make choices in our lives. And in most cases, victims in today's society don't see justice done. And that's a problem. The other problem with this department's presentation is on performance measures. It writes future performance measures for years number of cases blah blah blah is considered performance measure but we're going to do blah blah blah.

You know what, that was in the budget book last June. Last June they said they were gonna come up with performance measures. So the point is let's let the rubber hit the road how is holistic working on recidivism rates? Again that was in the budget book last June And I don't want to be a broken record, but that's part of my job. Public Defender's Office San Luis Obispo got privatized years ago.

No reportable problems. Again we're not against the work they're doing it needs to be done but does it have to come with the county pension? Lawyers out there are literally a dime a dozen. Not the good ones necessarily, but lawyers out there, there's no shortage and you have to contract right now sometimes with lawyers. Why won't you look at it? San Luis has been doing it for years. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.873:00:14 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Okay with that we will break until one o'clock Good morning.

3:02 – 5:301 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:06 · ≈ 12:02 PM

Good morning. Good morning. Hello. The ♪ . . Hi. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, everyone. Good morning. you you Hi. Thank you. Hi. you Okay. You. ♪♪ Yeah. Good morning. Good morning. Hi. Hello. ♪ ♪ . . Good morning, everyone. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You. you Yeah. Music Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. you You. Okay. ♪ you Hello.

Thank you. Hello. The The . . Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Hi. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I'm You. ♪ Good morning. Hello. Good morning. Hello. ♪ . . . . Thank you. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, everyone. Music You. Thank you. Yeah. Music Yeah. Thank you. You. you Okay. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. you Hello everyone.

Thank you. Hello. The . . . . Thank you. You. Thank you. ♪ ♪ Good morning. Oh, Thank you. . . . ♪

5:30 – 5:325 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.875:30:36 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Was Peter back? He's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:30:42 · ≈ 2:30 PM

there.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.875:30:45 · ≈ 2:30 PM

All right, well welcome back. We're a little bit later than we had originally anticipated. Sheriff Brown if you'd like to come up and just give us a quick update please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed5:31:01 · ≈ 2:31 PM

Thank you, Chair Levin. You know as everybody's well aware we received a report through the Santa Barbara Police Department of a call that identified this building and several people in a threat. We obviously wanted to take that threat seriously. We wanted to make sure that the building was safe for all of you and we called in our Uh, explosive sniffing dog. We were fortunate in that the dog was on training today in Ventura and happened to be with two other certified bomb dogs one from the Cal State San Bernardino Police Department and one from the use of the San Luis Obispo Cal Poly campus police.

And fortunately we had Three canine teams that were here and we're able to clear this building much quicker than we could have done otherwise. So, thank you for your indulgence. We're investigating the source of the threat and that's that we have developed some information already so I hope they'll more information be later to tell you about that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.875:32:08 · ≈ 2:32 PM

Great, thank you very much and we do appreciate everybody's help in this Okay, so what that has unfortunately done is pushed us back some. So just heads up for everybody that is watching or is planning on showing up. We're going to move through our departmental budgets but we are going to, I'll let you know now, we are going to definitely take homelessness and the library update Friday.

Unfortunately can't do it tomorrow because we aren't noticed. Mr. Gazzone? Or could we? No, we just want to do it. We're going to do it Friday. Policy choice. We're gonna do a Friday so will lead off Friday with those two items. So we will move now to probation with Chief Heitman.

5:32 – 5:573 turns

CommentTanya HeitmanProposedself-stated5:32:55 · ≈ 2:32 PM

Chair Lavignone, members of the board, good afternoon. I'm Tanya Heitman, Chief Probation Officer. With me today are Deputy Chief Probation Officers Holly Benton, Kim Sheehan, Sean Small and Administrative Deputy Director Damon Fletcher. Fortunately our public defender or sheriff have already teed things up with broaching a lot of the same topics that I'll be covering today.

It continues to be an exciting time for the field of community corrections and is often the case along with new opportunities come some challenges. Last year, the state passed bail reform legislation through SB 10 focused on the use of a validated risk assessment to inform release decisions. Subsequently, a referendum sponsored by the bail industry qualified for the November 2020 ballot and as state implementation.

Nonetheless it's clear that whether through legislation Appellate court case decisions or other litigation, the bail system will be changing and we need to be poised to respond. In addition to bail reform there are many other potential changes that we're monitoring closely. SB 284 would increase the county's cost for certain commitments to the Department of Juvenile Justice from $24,000 to $125,000 a year. SB 144 would eliminate the assessment of fees for services provided to adult offenders And AB 901 would prohibit probation departments from engaging in prevention services. And would dramatically curtail local efforts to assist in the coordination of prevention and diversion activities.

We'll be monitoring these and many other proposed bills very closely this legislative season. I am glad to be able to report that all of the department's management and executive staff positions are currently filled. We're very much engaged in the development of new staff, as we strive to build a deeper bench to pull from going forward. We want to ensure that we're able to maintain stable leadership despite the fact that our sworn staff typically retire at age 55 and over 35% of our current workforce is over 50. Additionally, over 80% of our management staff are over 50.

Attracting new employees and developing them into the leaders of tomorrow is a primary focus. The probation department's proposed operating budget is approximately $58.7 million, and includes almost 27.9 million of general fund. In preparing the five year forecast, it was anticipated that probation would be facing a $1.2 million budget gap. However, that analysis assumed a flat general fund contribution. The re-implementation of allocating general fund based on salary growth significantly reduced the department's anticipated gap.

In addition, the department's salary and benefit costs did not increase as much as projected due in large part to the employees picking up a share of retirement that were previously born by the county. With these adjustments, as well as a reduction of positions associated with lower aftercare caseloads and lower average daily population in our institutions, the department was able to submit a proposed budget with no service level reductions.

We've submitted one expansion request although it might better be categorized as a transition request. It's related to pretrial services which I'll address in detail in a few minutes. State and federal intergovernmental revenues make up 48% of the department's budget, and now exceeds our general fund contribution. This revenue includes public safety realignment and SB 678 which funds programs specifically designated for felony probationers.

We also included our three separate funding allocations for youthful offenders, as well as Prop 172. Many of these revenues are based on sales tax or block grants and are independent of salary costs. Consequently routine salary increases create an annual budget challenge for the department. In addition while we've seen strong sales tax growth in recent years many of these funding streams will face significant decrease when the next contraction or recession occurs.

Charges for services include fees collected directly from adult offenders. And as I mentioned earlier, due to potential changes in legislation it's anticipated that these collections may be eliminated in the future although it is hoped that the state will provide some level of backfill should this occur. Our budget, our department's budget is divided across four programs. The largest division is adult services where staff complete over 1200 sentencing investigations and supervise over 3600 offenders.

The institution's budget includes the Santa Maria Juvenile Hall which is currently staffed for 48 and the Los Prados Boys Camp, which is currently staffed for 32. We estimate that the combined average daily population in the institutions will be 56 for the coming fiscal year ensuring that our facilities are safely staffed despite periodic population increases as well as a need to maintain compliance With newly adopted regulations that require additional staff resources.

Juvenile services process 2,700 referrals annually, prepare court reports and supervise just over 400 youth. Administration and support provides the IT, fiscal evaluation, HR and other support functions necessary for the department to efficiently and effectively achieve its mission. The proposed budget shows a net decrease of 3.5 FTEs. This is the net impact of reducing five institutions officers and a 0.5 AOP due to reductions in aftercare caseload numbers, and the average daily facility populations.

Addition of a supervising probation officer to address continued increased workload and supervision needs in the adult division. And a grant funded departmental business assistant to assist in further integration of evidence based practices and contract oversight in the juvenile division. Fiscal year 1920 operating revenues will increase by $620,000 compared to current years adopted revenues. This is primarily due to increases in realignment and Prop 172 sales tax revenue.

The department's fiscal year 19-20 general fund contribution is $27.89 million and represents a $622,000 increase from the current year. The Probation Department continues to be innovative and seeks opportunities to enhance outcomes while responding to the latest legislative changes and best practices. In fiscal year 17-18, as one of the department's Renew 22 initiatives, the Juvenile Division conducted a thorough review and data mining effort on all juvenile cases.

The review and comparison was very beneficial and instructive. It allowed the department to make significant policy changes, and set the stage for new initiatives that will ensure increased engagement with youth and families focusing on individualized case management and community based treatment services. We're working to increase diversion opportunities and plan to expand them through funding currently available as well as through grant opportunities.

The juvenile division was also recently selected as a reimagining Juvenile Justice Initiative site. This is a staff development initiative sponsored by the Annie E Casey Foundation its objective is Is to develop our staff's capacity to support divert and redirect youth. To appropriate and fair justice options, including options that require a high degree of cross system collaboration and coordination.

It is based on adolescent development research and is intended to help our staff move from historically punitive framework. One that pushes many young people deeper into system involvement towards a more effective approach To addressing the multifaceted needs of youth and their families, helping them minimize or avoid system involvement. The approach utilizes a positive youth development framework to focus on youth's protective factors and strengths not just risk factors and problems.

We're very excited about this initiative as it is perfectly aligned with our local juvenile justice strategic plan and will provide invaluable training and technical assistance to our team. With the support of now retired Supervisor Wolf, the department implemented the Los Prados Business Center in the county's former reprographics center. The department has purchased new equipment enabling the youth to provide additional services as well as be more responsive to the current volume of work.

A full-time support staff was added to help manage the jobs and oversee the training of the youth. We're very pleased to see the volume of orders steadily increasing And appreciate the county departments who serve as the boys customers. The youth have completed printing jobs for at least 50% of the 24 county departments and we're optimistic that we'll be able to increase that percentage in the coming year through further outreach.

As an integral member of the county's law enforcement community, the probation department participated in and led numerous special enforcement operations over the last year. These include Santa Maria and Lompoc gang suppression operations, Safe Kids sex offender and child pornography detection and compliance, Isla Vista Halloween suppression, Lompoc Riverbed cleanup, Fiesta and Santa Maria Fair, and quarterly DUI operations.

In fiscal year 1920, the department will be undertaking many projects that support our mission as well as the county's Renew 22 initiative. For example, our Chief Innovation Officer John Quo in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Data Committee worked with a consultant to develop the Master Name Index which matches individuals across disparate department systems as an essential first phase of data integration within the criminal justice system. The project is now in phase two, having already incorporated the sheriff and probation department systems and is currently working to add the court.

This will allow for numerous automation efforts such as court calendar notifications which will reduce redundant data entry. One of the outcomes of the Juvenile Data Mining Project was a recognition of the need to select and implement a new juvenile risk and needs assessment tool. After extensive review of the various evidence-based assessment tools, the Positive Achievement Change Tool or PACT was selected.

The pact will provide structure and consistency to the juvenile supervision decision making process, and help ensure all youth who enter the system are processed in an equitable fashion. By assessing actuarial risk, the system is able to focus services on higher risk youth, ensuring they're receiving services to address their individual needs and risks. The utilization of a validated risk tool like PACT Is one of the eight principles of evidence based practices that together have been shown to reduce the likelihood of recidivism.

In the next fiscal year, the juvenile staff will be trained and will fully implement this new assessment tool. Through legislation sponsored by CSAC, our county is one of six that will be piloting a new approach to domestic violence programming. As was mentioned by the public defender earlier, the current statute is very outdated and prevented us from incorporating evidence-based principles of risk, need and responsivity into domestic violence offenders treatment through AB 372.

We have the opportunity to design treatment around evidence-based principles and the research currently available. We'll be studying these new interventions in partnership with CSAC and the other pilot counties, to help identify those programs which are successful in reducing recidivism and leading to more favorable outcomes in this very challenging population.

The department has several renew 22 initiatives within the rebalancing category we've identified 2. The one currently underway is related to maximizing institutional staffing efficiencies in the current year. The department converted the staffing of the Juvenile Halls Master Control Room from sworn to civilian staff, to achieve a cost savings as well as to establish better trained and more specialized staffing complement for this important function.

In the coming year, the department will continue to identify duties that can be completed by civilian staff or contractors to reduce costs and ensure that our sworn peace officers are deployed in the most efficient manner. Through the use of new scheduling software The department also aims to achieve efficiencies utilizing demand staffing within the facilities and better analyzing staffing trends to reduce the use of overtime while ensuring appropriate staffing levels across the facilities.

Using a cloud based platform staff can readily assess the system from any computer or mobile device increasing awareness and response time to facility issues and needs. Schedulers supervisors and managers can better monitor track and respond to the facilities staffing shortages overages and other important trends. By automating schedule processes, including trades over time and training. There's increased consistency in the application of agency rules and requirements while reducing errors omissions and potential abuse all of which help ensure compliance with federal state and local regulations In the coming year, we'll be exploring options in the adult division related to early terminations and conversions to unsupervised probation for those who may not require supervision due to their risk levels or who have successfully completed their court-ordered programs.

We will be approaching this review as an opportunity to increase our focus on best practices and evidence based decision making while ensuring that our resources are deployed for While allowing those that are no longer in need of supervision to be relieved of the financial and supervision requirements that may negatively impact their ability to benefit from other educational, employment or housing opportunities.

In the redesign domain, we have the juvenile data project. Each accomplishment within this project is akin to adding another rung on a ladder that enables us to move further ahead. Thus far, we've seen a 32% reduction in the number of youth supervised. A 39% reduction in the facility population and an 81% reduction in the number of youth in congregate care.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.875:47:44 · ≈ 2:47 PM

I'm sorry, in what care?

CommentTanya HeitmanProposedself-stated5:47:46 · ≈ 2:47 PM

Congregate care. So group homes or residential treatment. Implementation of the pact, establishing new contracts for diversion and alternative sanctions as well as embarking on the reimagining juvenile justice initiative are all important next rungs on our ladder. E-reception another redesign effort has entailed reviewing as clients physically enter the probation offices, looking for ways to improve processes to increase efficiency through automation.

An important first step was a conversion of our case management system to the latest version which occurred in late February. This expands opportunities for the implementation of several new case management modules which allow offenders to submit monthly reports online Enhance communication and data collection for clients referred to community-based organizations.

Improve kiosk reporting, and move towards clients checking in at the kiosks rather than with the receptionist. In addition, the department is working to implement online credit card payments which would be a less staff intensive option. But perhaps most exciting for us in fiscal year 1920 We'll begin planning efforts for a building consolidation in Santa Barbara. Currently, administration and adult services are located downtown while juvenile services and the probation report and resource center are located on the Hollister campus.

The result is redundant staff activities and positions as well as lost time due to the separate facilities, not to mention temperature control security and space issues. Consolidating operations into a single built-to-suit building will create significant efficiencies while enhancing staff safety and comfort. We are very appreciative of your board support for the building project and for the work that General Services and the CEO staff have undergone to find a viable option for us.

We already have some initial plans for savings, but look forward to fully launching the planning effort with our internal staff to ensure that we're exploring all options and thinking ahead for the many opportunities that this presents. The department has 35 performance measures. I'm just going to highlight a few. The revenue recovery units focus is a collection of restitution fines and fees from offenders. The level of collections Has remained consistent despite reductions in the number of offenders and legislation that is limited assessment of some fees.

It's anticipated the department will collect $800,000 in restitution for victims of crime this year. One measure of success is the low rates of adjudication of youthful offenders for a felony while they're on probation. The department continues to see success and anticipates that only 15% of youth will receive a new sustained petition for a felony offense while they're under supervision.

Referrals for youthful offenders has decreased in recent years, it's anticipated that referrals will continue to decrease slightly in the coming fiscal year. The strategic changes in our juvenile division are seeing much success. The number of youthful offenders under supervision has decreased and now more closely matches a trend that's occurring across the state.

The department is seeing success with only 10% of adult offenders receiving a new felony conviction during their term of supervision. Changes in legislation and reductions in criminal filings have resulted in a reduction in the number of investigation reports Completed annually and the number of adults under supervision. The department's fiscal year 1920 proposed budget includes no service level reductions as I mentioned earlier rather than an expansion request we have what would better be categorized as a transition request when the intensive pretrial supervision program was implemented in fiscal year 1718 with realignment funding it was uncertain how much demand there would be After a slow startup, it became apparent that the demand for the program exceeded the supervision capacity of the two officers initially funded and it began necessary to expand to four officers.

Yet even with four officers, the program continues to grow. The current staffing allows for the supervision of 120 defendants countywide. Absent additional staffing resources, The department will need to either increase caseloads and reduce supervision and services to the offenders, create a wait list to control the case load size requiring eligible individuals to remain in jail until a spot opens for them or some combination of these two strategies.

None of these are desirable options. To address the supervision capacity while also positioning our county for further reform efforts, the department has worked with the courts and CEO's office on a plan to transfer responsibility for pretrial assessments and reports from court special services to probation. The court is in full support of the transfer and anticipates this will position our county well for future funding opportunities And legislative changes as well as allow the program to expand is needed.

The pretrial services program is divided into two main functions, the court staff perform assessments and prepare reports and probation provides supervision services. Consolidating functions within probation will create efficiencies that will result in maintaining or potentially improving the number of individuals being assessed While also allowing for the addition of 2 deputy probation officers to increase our supervision capacity.

It's anticipated that the transfer can come be completed at the beginning of the calendar year through the transfer a reconfiguration of the staffing will result in the addition of a supervising probation officer 7 pretrial assessors and an AOP to continue the service currently provided by the court while adding Two deputy probation officers to supplement the four AB 109 funded pretrial compliance officers, to address the growing caseload needs.

The court's current fiscal year pre-trial program budget is just over 1.2 million and is funded through county general fund and 88,000 of realignment funding. It's anticipated that the court's fiscal year 19-20 budget would increase by about 72,000 due to recently funded negotiated salary increases for their current staff. So what you see on the slide assumes a mid-year transfer of these functions and the associated funding with 624,000 of general fund and 44,000 realignment revenue. The probation department can assume at mid year can assume the responsibility at mid-year this 624 thousand consists of a transfer of 589,000 or half the courts current Fiscal year general fund budget and an additional 36,000 of general fund to finance the negotiated salary increases.

As part of the agreement to transfer the services probation will hire all of existing assessors who wish to continue in their position provided they pass the required background. We will assume assessment and report responsibilities, low level monitoring of the existing caseload. As well as increased services to the intensive supervised population that can only be released from jail with additional oversight all while living within the existing funding.

To be clear this transfer although listed is $624,650 expansion is a shift in general fund from the court to probation it is only a $36,000 expansion of general fund. We've submitted a balanced budget without any service level reductions. The department continues to explore staffing and assignments within the organization to ensure duties are performed at the most appropriate level.

Efforts undertaken in support of the county's Renew 22 initiative have focused juvenile services on the youth with the greatest risk and diverted youth of lower risk. As mentioned earlier, we have already seen very strong results with reductions in key areas. Over 356 individuals have been supervised on intensive pretrial supervision this fiscal year, with only 24 offenders having missed a court date. The vast majority or approximately 94% are continuing to appear in court while out on pre-trial supervision.

Statistics reported to the BSCC, Board of State and Community Corrections show that the unsentenced portion of the jail population as a share of the total population decreased from 73% in 2017 to 63% in 2018. This program has shown potential at maintaining court appearances and impacting the jail population. The addition of two officers will ensure that the program is able to increase its capacity while also positioning us for Author and leadership expert Robin Sharma said, every tiny effort builds on the next so that brick by brick magnificent things can be created.

Just as we've seen the efforts in our juvenile division and in our pretrial services build, we're confident with patience, perseverance, and determination. Brick by brick, we're building a preferable future for our department, those we serve, and the community. As your chief probation officer I continue to pursue efforts Focused on delivering evidence-based programs grounded in the latest research and trends in the criminal justice system to clients that most need them while diverting clients out of the system into a lower level of intervention. That may be harmed rather than helped by more intense interventions, the efforts of the probation officers who work with our clients make positive impacts on their lives. Together, we create change and create magnificent opportunities for a better life for our clients and the citizens of Santa Barbara County.

Thank you for your time and I'll answer any questions you might have.

5:57 – 6:0112 turns

GuestHartProposed · by introduction5:57:55 · ≈ 2:57 PM

Open it up for questions. Supervisor Hart? Yeah, I just want to congratulate you and your team and the probation officers on taking the lead with the pretrial services transition. I think that's a really great collaborative effort with the courts. It's taking initiative to put the people where they potentially have the most impact and can make the most beneficial assignments of For those individuals to get them back on track and the numbers speak for themselves. 94% is a continuation of their appearances in court, demonstrates that it's working you're using clearly defined parameters and scientific evidence to determine risk and making the appropriate thing so I think that's a huge.

Improvement and want to make sure that if you find this is successful in the middle of the fiscal year, that you're not hesitant to come back and say that you need additional funding to invest in that. because I think there is great opportunity here as part of this collaborative effort of reducing the jail population. This is a really force multiplier. And then just also want to thank you and congratulate you for your work with juvenile services, reimagining those services and refocusing them. The numbers that you quoted in your presentation are truly astounding.

Focusing on positive attributes and potential of youth is really a long term investment again in making change and the numbers speak for themselves so I think you're doing a fabulous job. Your teammates in the public safety work group agree and thank you very much for your great work.

CommentTanya HeitmanProposedself-stated5:59:27 · ≈ 2:59 PM

Thank you supervisor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:59:29 · ≈ 2:59 PM

Supervisor Williams. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:59:31 · ≈ 2:59 PM

just want to also tell you, I think this is really exciting. I see potential and hope here and really hope—just want to extend to your staff that a lot of our hope in the future lies with them and with their success.

CommentPam Flint TamboProposed5:59:51 · ≈ 2:59 PM

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.875:59:52 · ≈ 2:59 PM

Well I don't know, she mentioned most of them are over 50 so I'm not sure they're future. How about future staff? We'll get to go out and recruit some new people. So Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.836:00:05 · ≈ 3:00 PM

Well I just wanted to say it's transformative and thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:00:09 · ≈ 3:00 PM

And I just say, you know, and I get to meet with Chief Heitman and most of the department heads. I'm sure as everybody else does. I don't think I've ever had a time when I felt more collaboration in maybe it's Renew 22 or maybe it's personalities but between our public defender and probation or district attorneys off in the sheriff's department seems like public safety is all coming together.

And I think that was one of the big tenants of Renew 22 is to knock down these silos and everybody be working on the same Working on the same page. So it's really nice to see some of the same statistics being quoted in different areas. So thank you very much for all you do. OK, any public comment on probation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:00:55 · ≈ 3:00 PM

Chair Levenino and members of the board we have no requests to speak.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:00:57 · ≈ 3:00 PM

Supervisor Adam are you all good? You look good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:01:02 · ≈ 3:01 PM

I'm good.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:01:03 · ≈ 3:01 PM

I thought so. Thank you. Not too hesitant to speak up. All right, thank you very much. We will now move to District Attorney Joyce Dudley.

6:01 – 6:1612 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:01:38 · ≈ 3:01 PM

Good afternoon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed6:01:39 · ≈ 3:01 PM

Good afternoon,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:01:40 · ≈ 3:01 PM

Chair Lavagnino and members of the board, Supervisor Adam. Okay all right it is truly my honor to present our department's budget today but first I'd like to acknowledge this extraordinary team to my left Michael Soderman, Shauna Jorgensen, Nicole Acosta and behind me Arlene Mendoza and hard at work in my office Alina Chapchian and Alex Lee. This is an extraordinary team really truly what they do is give me a script and I recite it They do all the work Thank you I also want to extend my appreciation to the other group that makes this office work so well, and that's the executive staff who supports our administrative efforts. Pat Klaus, Cindy Gresser, Mag Nicola, Megan Reinschild, John Savarnak, and Debbie Fox.

Okay, so... Your district attorney's office is facing several challenges and emerging issues. Like many other departments, we're concerned with the challenges we're facing with recruitment and retention. Recruitment and retention and recruitment and retention that is our biggest problem. Our ability to recruit and retain high quality staff is critical. Significant legislative challenges have also required the review and potential relitigation of closed cases. In some cases these cases are decades old Decades have passed. Difficult to get witnesses, challenging to put a case together and each new legislative change has significant effects on our workload.

We have several large and not just large but complex cases on the horizon that continue to strain our resources. These include the largest gang case in county history A capital murder case and the historic Golden State killer case. Advancements in technology have increased the volume of electronic discovery, more evidence is of course a good thing but it also impacts workload and clearly our IT infrastructure probably IV as well.

Lastly, developing and implementing our new system is always a challenge. We've been working on three at the same time, the electronic file sharing, our eSCARs and our new case management system. The District Attorney's Office budget for next year is $27.3 million. Our recommended budget includes 140.5 FTEs. We're using $172,000 in funds balance draw to support operations and interestingly enough that's from Prop 172.

Lastly I'm pleased to report that for the last time in my tenure Maybe for the first time in my tenure. We don't have any service level reductions Restoration requests or expansion request so chair Lavagnino can I sit down now?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:04:33 · ≈ 3:04 PM

No, you may not hey, I get to tell a district attorney something This may come back to bite me no

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:04:40 · ≈ 3:04 PM

no

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:04:40 · ≈ 3:04 PM

no I'll walk the straight and narrow

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:04:43 · ≈ 3:04 PM

Just, I know it's been a long afternoon for all of you. I'm trying to be as- You like to hear all the good

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:04:46 · ≈ 3:04 PM

news!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:04:47 · ≈ 3:04 PM

Okay, let's hear all the good news. Capital projects details. Our office will have two capital projects next year. The first is our new case management system which I'll discuss further in a few minutes. The second is our digital storage system upgrade. We need more storage space so we can purchase additional service storage. This will maximize our investment and extend the life of our existing system for an historic two years.

Our largest funding source, of course, is general fund contribution at $14.3 million. As you'd expect, criminal prosecution efforts make up the vast majority of costs within the DA's office and again no surprise every year I remind you of this but the salaries and benefits represent 88% of our total operating budget. People are our most valuable resource. We're also most vulnerable if our people aren't there But they also have the greatest impact on our budget. That's why recruitment, development and retention continue to be so critical.

There are 140.5 FTEs in our recommended budget mentioned that already As you can see, our revenue has increased over the past few years. We're seeing a slight increase in Prop 172 revenue but most of our revenue growth has been grant related. Thank you Supervisor Hartman for appreciating that and responding to that. I'm hopeful that we're going to be able to keep doing that and that the county in fact will get us a grant writer so that we can even apply for more grants.

We've been very aggressive in our pursuit of grant funding and it's paid off by helping our community safety. The problem is we're limited to what we can use this money for, so even though the chart shows a revenue increase It doesn't show that almost all of it grant funding is restricted for specific programs. Our general fund contribution will increase slightly next year, as you can see it has remained relatively flat over the past five years despite the fact that our salaries and benefits continues to rise.

As to slide 10, our anticipated accomplishments. Everything we do is to enhance public safety and ensure justice for all. It's the foundation of everything you'll see in the next few slides. We completed the prosecution of the refugio oil spill criminal case. We developed a vertical prosecution unit to combat illegal cannabis operations throughout our county. We now have an attorney and an investigator dedicated to cannabis enforcement We initiated a domestic violence training program for law enforcement officers in an effort to prevent domestic violence homicides. As I mentioned to you a couple of months ago, these are the most predictable type of homicides aside from DUI homicides. Most DV homicides are perpetrated by people with prior law enforcement contact.

Our goal for 2018 was to have zero domestic violence homicides perpetrated by someone with prior law enforcement contact. We exceeded our goal. We did something that continues to move me, there were no domestic violence homicides at all in Santa Barbara County in 2018. We provide victim and investigative assistance to family members and survivors in the devastating borderline mass shooting event in Thousand Oaks from 1 a.m on we rolled out there and we continue to stand with our colleagues This year we helped facilitate the creation of the Federal Human Trafficking Task Force Housing Subcommittee. This subcommittee worked with several agencies to secure private funding for the very first human trafficking safe house in our county, which opened in 2018.

We implemented technology initiatives to streamline business processes and effectively share information with our criminal justice partners. And Chair Labadino, I agree with you the people that are running these departments now, the department heads we are working together in a way that I've never seen before and it's truly making our county safer so I appreciate my colleagues in all of the criminal justice departments.

We continue to seek our additional grant opportunities to provide critical services to our constituents and expanded our grant portfolio to 18 grants totaling $3 million in annual funding. I must say, I have an annoying habit of emailing my executive staff in the middle of the night And it's usually when I find a grant that I'm really excited about. And I've told Michael, turn off the phone. You don't have to respond to an email in the middle of the night but I find this grant and I think this grant is really exciting so I gotta tell all of them at once. And Michael, bless him comes to work the next day a little red eyed and said okay I read about the grant. Yeah Joyce we can do that too and so I appreciate it because when I see a grant that's gonna be good for Santa Barbara County it's just impossible for me not to want to go for it.

We also recruited and onboarded 19 full-time and extra help employees as well as 28 volunteer interns who provided support to attorneys, legal support staff, investigators and victim witness advocates. That kind of turnover has a significant impact on the quality controls in our workloads both administratively and operationally Okay. As to the objectives for 18-19, always more to be done. The first Operation Matador case will go to trial next year. An unprecedented amount of time, effort and resources has gone into this and will continue to go into this until at least 2021.

Our message is simple. We will rigorously prosecute gangs in Santa Barbara County period. Following the tragic mass shooting in Las Vegas and Thousand Oaks, it became clear that it's not a matter of if. It's a matter of when we all hope it won't happen here. But if it does, we are going to be prepared. That's why we secured grant funding to develop a mass casualty response plan in coordination with our law enforcement partners.

We expect to play a major role in prosecuting the alleged Golden State killer case I was in Sacramento last week meeting water I keep trying to break my record, don't I? Okay. Last week I was up in Sacramento meeting with the other district attorneys who have murder cases and the Golden State Killer case we're continuing to work together in the hopes of A justice and B keeping the costs down.

We'll continue to enforce local ordinances by eliminating unlicensed cannabis operations in partnership with Santa Barbara County Cannabis Enforcement Team We plan to further develop our civil environmental unit to strengthen Santa Barbara County's enforcement of consumer and environmental laws. Lastly, we will focus on staff recruitment retention development as well as utilizing technology to streamline business processes one of the ways that we support our staff is what I was doing this afternoon, which is being in court watching a prosecutor put two children who've been molested on the stand. An eight year old and nine year old and watching the professionalism which she used to solicit the truth from these children and watching the children's parents respond.

It's not just a matter of putting on those cases it's a matter of us and administration showing up and showing that we care. And that's the way we're going to be able to hang onto good DAs We have three renewed 22 initiatives, Case Management System Upgrade, Electronic Suspected Child Abuse Reporting System and Core FTP Electronic File Sharing Program and Discovery.

This year we expect to have a final contract in place for our new management system. We initiated development of the eSCARS application. We also successfully completed the pilot for the electronic file sharing. Next year we plan to implement the new case system and eSCAR systems. Finally, we will expand the use of electronic file sharing to all local law enforcement partners.

The next two slides show our performance measures. I'll certainly respond to any questions you might have. As to slide 18, I'm very pleased we don't have any service level reductions proposed for next year. In terms of the summary, in spite of our many successes your district attorney's office is facing several challenges. Again and again our ability to recruit and retain staff continues to be a problem. Continuous legislative changes have a significant impact on our office. We're also facing a continued drain on office resources due to large high profile and very complex cases. As technology continues to advance the volume of electronic discovery increases. As more and more discovery becomes available, our workloads and IT infrastructure will be even more strained than they already are.

We'll continue to harness technology to develop and implement new initiatives in an effort to streamline business processes and effectively share information with our criminal justice partners. All that being said, your DA's office is a passionate family comprised of extremely dedicated, high quality and hardworking individuals who fight relentlessly to pursue truth justice all the time.

I can't begin to tell you how proud I am of them. So in closing, I just want to share an excerpt from a letter that was recently written by a survivor of sexual assault to one of our deputy district attorneys, the same deputy district attorney who I had the honor of watching all day today This was a case that was assigned to her, and this victim actually went from that remarkable trend from victim to survivor to advocate. In fact right now she is a crime victim advocate in another state.

She gave us permission to share her words with you today. This is the why behind what we do, this is the quote that I'm most proud of and these are her words. I'm finally the happiest safest and most carefree I've ever been because of you again she's referring to the deputy DA. You showed me what it means to never give up. You made me believe in myself, my story, my integrity and most importantly you showed me how to believe and trust people again. I will never be able to repay you for giving me back my life. Thank you for fighting for girls like me.

Thank you for supporting your DA's office.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:15:18 · ≈ 3:15 PM

Good do we have questions? I have one, but it's more of CEO Miyasato. So a number of departments have come and talked about technology issues and that seems to be an underlying issue. And I see that we're putting aside $2 million in this year's budget to kind of seed this. But how is that going to be distributed? Is there going to be competitive arm wrestling over it or how's it going to work?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed6:15:47 · ≈ 3:15 PM

Well, I wouldn't want to wrestle the D.A., so I'll let you know that right now. So through Jeanette Pell's Department of General Services we have a technology group EITC and I can't remember what that stands for but it's all the technology requests will be coming through that and it's an attempt for us to have a better handle on all the technology needs in the county where We're going through a process, and there are different subcommittees of getting standards reviewed in uniform. But this money will seed different types of needs throughout the county on just upgrading some basic infrastructure to major projects. So that's the form for it. They'll be submitting their requests through that process.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:16:26 · ≈ 3:16 PM

All right, and then for District Attorney, the only question I had was on one of your performance measures. And it's on slide 17, and it's the last one. The percent of felony cases resolved before a preliminary hearing thus reducing jail population. And I just need to understand more about how would we, Explain to me a circumstance like that and what is our, I see our recommendation is to get close to 60% of them which is less than what we've done in the

6:16 – 6:2619 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:16:58 · ≈ 3:16 PM

past so. So just to be clear, percent of felony convictions for cases past the preliminary hearing stage? Is that when you referred to- No,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:17:05 · ≈ 3:17 PM

no, the bottom one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:17:06 · ≈ 3:17 PM

Okay.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:17:06 · ≈ 3:17 PM

The

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:17:07 · ≈ 3:17 PM

ones resolved before preliminary hearing. Resolved before preliminary hearing thus reducing jail population in number of cases. Yeah, that's a frustration for us. It used to be the case that we could resolve cases in arraignment. They're not being resolved there as frequently as they used to be. I'm sure for very good reasons on the part of the defense, but there has been a drop in that.

There also has been a move forward to move cases forward and not wait until everything is available for someone to make a decision from the defense thus rushing ahead with a preliminary hearing setting that ends up getting continued. So there's a continuous problem I think that when I was in court, I heard that the public defender mentioned it as well. And I think that it's very frustrating. I can tell you from a prosecutor perspective that it's much more difficult for a prosecutor to get a continuance than defense attorney because defense attorney's response can be that we're doing further investigation but if we rush a case through, it could come back a problem on appeal.

So we will continue to work with our criminal justice partners on this and I share your frustration.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:18:25 · ≈ 3:18 PM

So, I think it speaks again to the issue of courtroom flow and what we've been hearing about from both sides. Sure. And just, I guess that was one of the questions you had Supervisor Hartman, what is the forum to be able to address that with court services in the DA's office and the public defender and even probation and the sheriffs? What form do we use to figure out how do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:18:46 · ≈ 3:18 PM

Well, I think Supervisor Hartman had a terrific meeting in her office. I think more meetings and we all have too many meetings in our life and I think it's also drilling down to the details. For me if I was in the position of trying to judge it, I would pull 10 cases and say what happened in these ten cases because people can speak in generalities but when you speak about specifics you get a better window into that and perhaps people in administration like myself aren't seeing the details of what's happening in the courtroom, but I am relying on my deputy district attorneys and my chief deputy district attorneys to tell me. But I think it's a matter of staying with it, drilling down on the individual cases and then making some changes. I think that we're dealing with three very separate divisions—a defense, a district attorney, and the courts.

But hearing from you as we did this morning and as we're hearing now, it's important and we want to make it happen.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:19:44 · ≈ 3:19 PM

Okay. I think that's a really good idea. I think that's what happens in a single audit for like social services department. They come in and they pull 20 files, and they just kind of look back through them and find out what happened and why it happened. And it helps you create corrective action for those particular instances. Yeah. Okay. Very good. Supervisor Hart?

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:20:06 · ≈ 3:20 PM

Yeah, I think that's a great idea too. And it sort of fits with your new case management system potentially to use additional data being available from that that could pinpoint some of these inefficiencies and have it be fact based in that. That is real opportunity there. But I also want to congratulate you and thank you for your work on behalf of the wellness of first responders. You didn't even mention that in your presentation but that's extremely important work. And it has been overlooked for too long, and you're putting a spotlight on that. I really want to thank you for doing that. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:20:35 · ≈ 3:20 PM

so much. That means a lot to me and my department.

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:20:37 · ≈ 3:20 PM

Well, I know that you have a great team that's working together on this, and there's some good news coming up soon. Also, for your work on helping with human trafficking and survivors of that terrible situation. And also the great success with domestic violence and the homicides in that regard. Those are really incredible things. So if you have a minute, could you tell me a little bit more about the Misdemeanor Diversion Program? Sure. What that provides is potential for again reducing the jail

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:21:05 · ≈ 3:21 PM

population. I heard about the program, I want to say maybe right after I was elected so maybe back in 2010. Orange County was the department that was doing it then So I sent down the then Assistant District Attorney, Chief Deputy District Attorney at the time Gordon Achenklaus to Orange County and he spent two days learning about the program. Came back up here and we began to start the program here.

And it's been very successful. I would describe it as Supervisor Carbajal used to say is a win-win-win program I never used to use that term with quite some frequency. And yeah, and it still exists. The numbers aren't where we'd like to see the numbers because there's for a variety of reasons difficult to divert some of those crimes. We've now applied for a grant and got a grant three years ago to start diverting felony cases. And we're trying to figure out what those You know, felony cases are where we could have diversion. There is always this feeling that in diversion we may be missing people who need more jail time, more significant programs and so we always want to look at these cases carefully in our role as being the chief law enforcement official for the county.

So it's something we care about. If people don't have to be in jail, we don't want them in jail. People can do better outside of jail. We want them outside of jail. So it is a program that we care about and continue to look at and continue to expand.

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:22:40 · ≈ 3:22 PM

Well, anything we can do to help support that effort. I know the Public Safety Working Group is taking a look at all of the individual pieces of this and each one may not contribute dramatically to solving the problem and addressing the issue but incrementally each of those pieces matter a lot. Absolutely. So any way we can lean into each of those programs is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:22:57 · ≈ 3:22 PM

really helpful. And anytime we can take a human being that shouldn't be in custody and put them out and have them outside earning money contributing to our tax bases to raising their families it's far better.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:23:08 · ≈ 3:23 PM

Thank you. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.836:23:11 · ≈ 3:23 PM

I just wanted to echo another program, IV-SAFE that you didn't claim credit for but has had real results and really creates a community of interest around public safety in Isla Vista. It's made a huge difference and thank you. Thank you. Would you talk more about the domestic violence training that you have? Sure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:23:31 · ≈ 3:23 PM

Thank you also for mentioning IV-SAFE. Recently we formed that subcommittee last year on sexual assault when we saw the increase in sexual assault crimes in Isla Vista And we've now created some video, some media attention directing people's understanding of sexual assault crimes in Isla Vista and that just came out. So we're very excited about that. And your question was about?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.836:23:56 · ≈ 3:23 PM

The domestic violence

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:23:57 · ≈ 3:23 PM

training program. Right. So in 2017, we had five domestic violence murders Where we in the criminal justice system had contact with the perpetrator. So these were people who we knew about and somehow, we didn't do a good enough job and they committed murder later. So I met with all the law enforcement chiefs at our CLEC meeting. Met with my executive staff, met with the attorneys in the office and This is on us this year. We're going to make 2018 the year where there are no domestic violence murders, where we had contact with the perpetrators in our criminal justice system before and we thought about all the different ways we could do it. One of the ways was to train sergeants to take a better look at law enforcement reports and domestic violence, to increase the follow through, And other things we did was, we began to look at lethality studies and incorporating lethality studies.

And then we created a video that was shown to every law enforcement officer in the County of Santa Barbara about how to investigate a domestic violence case. We worked with humane societies so that we can get pets in the humane society so that people would not stay in domestic violence relationships in order to not be taken away from their pets. So we did this across-the-board effort And, you know, I'm never going to claim responsibility for the fact that there were no murders because there just were no murders. But I'm going to say bringing this heightened awareness, you know that phrase, you've got to name it to claim it? It was that kind of thing. Just no more. Not in Santa Barbara County. So we made all those different efforts and those videos are still being shown.

Because that was successful, we now made a human trafficking video as well And that's with people from the district attorney's office, sheriff's office so that we can show all law enforcement officers on how to better investigate human trafficking cases. Turns out if you show law enforcement officers videos of the talking heads in your county, that there is more of an engagement rather than just a talking head from another county. So this is our fifth video that we've made and that's where Lyle comes through because even though he doesn't work for our department, he always volunteers to help us.

6:26 – 6:4038 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed6:26:19 · ≈ 3:26 PM

Supervisor Adam. All good?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:26:23 · ≈ 3:26 PM

Yep, all good. I'll let you know. All right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:26:26 · ≈ 3:26 PM

Supervisor Williams. Well, I appreciate the addressing and the continued follow-up in working with justice partners on time to trial. You know, I know that meeting we all had in Joan's office was a little rocky at first but it's If we all wanna get along really well, we could all stay in our lane and solve no problem. So I appreciate you guys engaging in that dialogue trying to solve problems.

And also each of us owning that we all have a part of it, that we can do a part of this. And so when I encourage you and all the other justice partners to continue that.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed6:27:16 · ≈ 3:27 PM

We are really rather like-minded.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.836:27:22 · ≈ 3:27 PM

And if you want supervisorial involvement, let us know. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:27:27 · ≈ 3:27 PM

All right. Thank you very much. We appreciate it. All right. Let's do it. Court Special Services. I told you I'd get you in on time Darryl.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:27:46 · ≈ 3:27 PM

We're going to get you to that four o'clock, buddy.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:28:21 · ≈ 3:28 PM

How's that? Now I'm back, so go ahead. I had your mic turned off

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:28:28 · ≈ 3:28 PM

Maybe it was an accident.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed6:28:29 · ≈ 3:28 PM

It wasn't.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:28:30 · ≈ 3:28 PM

With me today is Patrick Ballard, our Chief Financial Officer. The Superior Court is an independent branch of government. We're not a county department but at one time the court was more closely associated with the county and in that role the court performed some county funded functions. We continue to perform those functions through a contractual relationship with the county. It's in that capacity that I'm here today updating you on what is described as court special services.

Those services include the grand jury, indigent defense contract administration, pretrial services, collection of delinquent debt and alternative dispute resolution administration. Some of the challenges that we're facing, Chief Heitman covered Senate Bill 10, the major changes in bail reform in our county or in the state actually that creates a presumption that persons arrested will be released And with appropriate levels of supervision.

That's stalled due to a ballot initiative that the bail community has put in place, but it seems that bail reform is inevitable and we continue to work with probation in the county on making the necessary changes. Other challenges include increasing costs of indigent defense, due to some of the cases that the DA has pointed out. And legislation introduced in 2017 eliminating license suspension as a consequence of failure to pay fines has resulted in a decline in revenue to the court and the county.

The summary of the operating budget is $14.8 million, the lion's share of that is a general fund which pays in part for 19.5 employees. Those are not county employees, those are all employees of the court though paid for with county dollars. The major source of the funds is a general fund contribution. Charges for services on their next largest area and reimbursements and fines and forfeitures round out the rest.

The use of those funds are interesting. The MOE payment is the obligation of the county to continue a payment as the court separated from the county, I like to call it the divorce. This is the alimony payment. It's the ongoing payments that the county will be making as a contribution to the courts. It fixed the county's contribution at that point in time and any increased costs beyond that were then the responsibility of the state and the judicial council.

So the remaining $4 million that funds what's left of Court Special Services go into ADR, Alternative Dispute Resolution, pretrial services, collections, conflict defense costs which are increasing and a small amount for the grand jury. All of the employees, like I said before, are court employees. You'll see in the next five year summary a decline in revenue that's associated with a change in attitudes nationwide about fines and forfeitures and their appropriateness along with the decline in criminal filings statewide. Those have resulted in a reduction in revenue to both the county and the court.

At the same time, I missed something. You're good. Okay, great. At the same time we see increasing costs in... We have one major capital case and we have that 11 defendant gang-related homicide that is a logistical challenge for us to try to accommodate and the cost associated with that continue to rise so you see a decline in revenue at the same time you see it increase in costs and it's creating this $680,000 gap Accomplishments, as we increase the use of supervised pretrial release. We're enhancing our performance measures to evaluate the effectiveness of those measures and those increases result in a need for more pre-trial compliance officers and will work with the probation department to address that need.

Our objectives include integrating pre-trial data collection. We moved to using a risk assessment instrument rather early, several years ago and we have created a data collection mechanism. We want to make sure in any transition that we inform the probation department's systems with that data and we don't lose that baseline data so that they don't have to start over and we can make sure that we've got effective measurements in determining the efficacy of Intensive supervised pre-trial release.

We're also considering releasing higher risk defendants with more intensive levels of supervision, but you have to balance that against the risks to the community as well. And then as Chief Heitman has pointed out we're exploring the possibility of moving pretrial services under the probation department using SB 10 as a framework. Our performance measures, we anticipate an increase in the volume of reports to be written in a pretrial in the coming year and a larger number of persons to be released pre-adjudication. You can see that these numbers are moving in the right direction as we increase the use of supervised pretrial release.

But with the greater number of those persons released on supervised pretrial release will likely come an increase in the failures to appear. The Pretrial Justice Institute suggests an FTA rate of 10% is not uncommon, and an FTA doesn't mean that they are absconded. It may mean that they failed to appear at one hearing and then appeared at a subsequent one. We expect to see an increase in the number of cases under the conflict defense contracts as well. And under ADR, we have a fairly stable number of persons availing themselves of alternate dispute resolution systems.

There are no service level reductions. I'm happy to report and in summary, this whole area of court special services is due for the county administrator and myself to work on a new memorandum of understanding. And we're going to work towards that in the coming year. We'll continue to monitor conflict defense costs with an eye towards trying to contain those costs.

And we'll work with the county and the probation department on the possibility of transferring pretrial to probation in the middle of the next fiscal year. I have to say, I share Public Defender McCouga's passion for trying to reduce delay in the justice system. She and I met on that topic a couple weeks ago and the court has agreed track the oldest cases and focus on those. In fact, during the break, the presiding judge Michael Carrozzo held a meeting of the Countywide Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee. It's a meeting of the criminal justice partners where he emphasized that fact that we have now given a list of all of the oldest cases to each of the judges with a focus on trying to move those cases through the system. And that's exactly what DA Dudley was suggesting is we highlight those cases.

The court's case management system might be the best case management system in the criminal justice system to provide that data. And we're happy to be active participants in that process. I did not go to the somewhat rocky meeting in Supervisor Hartman's. Thank you, whoever left me off the invite list. But

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:36:00 · ≈ 3:36 PM

if... Your presiding judge was there. Okay. This was last year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:36:07 · ≈ 3:36 PM

If we have more meetings like that, the courts are happy to be a participant in that conversation.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:36:13 · ≈ 3:36 PM

All right. Very good. We're hearing all the right things. Okay. So any questions for Daryl?

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:36:20 · ≈ 3:36 PM

Yeah, to that question or to the point you made about the case management system and its ability to track information. Does that have the ability to look at why? Continuances are part of the system and how long those delays accumulate is there it is their data in that system that can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:36:38 · ≈ 3:36 PM

be looked at the frequency of continuances I think is something we can produce. The reason would be dependent upon whether or not the clerk captured During the calendar hearing and I'm not certain that whether that's reflected, that it's the DA's motion or the public defender's motion or private counsel. I'm not certain if that's in there but the frequency of continuances we call them in the courts the churning of cases so How many times does it take a case to come on calendar before it reaches a disposition?

And that's one element. The other one is over what period of time, so the frequency and duration can be meaningful metrics as you try to track it moving in the right direction.

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:37:22 · ≈ 3:37 PM

So is that something looking forward that you could help to make sure it's specified in the tracking system as to who initiated the continuous and for what reason?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:37:33 · ≈ 3:37 PM

Yes, so long as I'm not discussing any individual case on behalf of the courts with the parties in the system. If I can aggregate data, I can provide data in that way to inform this conversation.

GuestHartProposed · by introduction6:37:45 · ≈ 3:37 PM

I think that'd be very helpful. That kind of data is critical to making adjustments and changes and reforms. And so thank you for that. And thank you for working so collaboratively with the probation department on the pretrial process to that transition. That's really going well and appreciate you helping and assisting in that. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:38:02 · ≈ 3:38 PM

I have a question about, we all kind of look at this as with our departments that churning is a problem but do the judges themselves, is that something they're concerned with? Is that something they're trying to or does it matter to them?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:38:20 · ≈ 3:38 PM

No, of course it matters. Expedition and timeliness is one of the objectives of the justice system. And attorneys who have not complied with discovery requests, attorneys who come to court unprepared is a constant frustration for a judge who has a large felony and misdemeanor calendar he's trying to move along. It's in all of our interests to reduce the number of continuances.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:38:42 · ≈ 3:38 PM

Make sure we're all pulling together. OK, perfect. This has nothing to do with your budget. I'm just curious, do you also, I know you deal with the grand jury, are you also as part of your purview regular juries? So I mean-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:38:54 · ≈ 3:38 PM

Yes, I'm

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:38:54 · ≈ 3:38 PM

the jury commissioner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:38:56 · ≈ 3:38 PM

Do you have jury duty coming up?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:38:58 · ≈ 3:38 PM

No, I've got something you can sign off for me. No. I was just curious how responsive our community is to jury summons. Do we track that or is that a problem for you or do enough people show up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:39:11 · ≈ 3:39 PM

We do have people show up, but I don't. I don't have that. Yeah, I didn't expect

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:39:15 · ≈ 3:39 PM

you to, but is it something

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:39:17 · ≈ 3:39 PM

we're not encouraging? It's not. It's we would prefer that the rates of response or higher because it can be challenges for us if you look at the population of the county of 400 and something thousand people. Not all of those are eligible to serve. That's a lot of people who aren't right. We send out about 85,000 summonses a year so we're always concerned about that note. No, it is not.

Response rate, but that's true nationwide.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:39:43 · ≈ 3:39 PM

But we're not rescheduling trials because we don't have juries?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:39:46 · ≈ 3:39 PM

No. I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:39:46 · ≈ 3:39 PM

mean, that's not an issue. OK,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:39:47 · ≈ 3:39 PM

perfect. We can run out of jurors in any given day. Say the complexity of the case goes through both sides' number of peremptories or hardships for service. We might go exhaust what we have for that day but we have panels on call each day of the week. Cool. All right. And if I might add, we are recruiting for grand jurors right now.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:40:06 · ≈ 3:40 PM

We always

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:40:06 · ≈ 3:40 PM

are. So anybody who's watching, go to sbcourts.org and click on Sign Up Now.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:40:12 · ≈ 3:40 PM

It's exciting work. All right. Very good. Thank you very much, Daryl. Hope we got you out on time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed6:40:18 · ≈ 3:40 PM

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:40:19 · ≈ 3:40 PM

All right. That brings us to our agriculture weights and measures with Kathleen Fisher. Yes, ma'am.

6:40 – 6:502 turns

CommentI'm Kathy FisherProposedself-stated6:40:55 · ≈ 3:40 PM

Thank you, Chair and good afternoon everyone. I'm Kathy Fisher, Agricultural Commissioner and I'm here with me today is with Matt Maitner, Deputy Sealer who's going to be assisting me with presenting the Agriculture Weights & Measures 19-20 Operating Budget. Examples of key challenges and emerging issues for the department next year include our continued involvement with regulating the cannabis industry, our new role regulating an emerging industrial hemp industry. And implementing new state mandated programs and regulations plus retaining high performing employees and succession planning for future leadership.

The recommended 1920 operating budget is approximately $6.2 million that includes $1.6 million for general fund and will sustain 37 full-time positions. There is no use of one time funding, no service level reductions and no expansion requests. Our sources of funding for the 19-20 fiscal year include 53% is provided by state and federal aid. 26% comes from county general fund, 5% from charges for services and 14% comes from fees for license and permits.

We plan on taking a small amount from our restricted fund this year to purchase new equipment and vehicles. Our budget provides funding for three divisions. The Agriculture Division receives the majority, or 74%, to support agricultural programs. The Weights and Measures Division receives 14% funding and 9% is allocated for administration and support. 12 Agricultural Programs and 5 Weights and Measures Programs provide a variety of inspection services that our agriculture and business community depend on.

The staffing summary chart illustrates our budget will continue to support 37 full-time positions next year. The graph of the five-year summary of the department's operating budget revenue shows an increase of $380,000 compared to this year's revenue. The majority if not all of the increases from state and federal aid for agricultural programs. The graph of the five-year summary of the department's general fund contribution reflects a slight increase of $42,900 compared to last year. Thank you Jeff for that.

Our anticipated accomplishments for this fiscal year will be to meet our regulatory responsibilities with the county's cannabis business license program and continue to support the county cannabis compliance team as well as pilot the California Department of Food and Agriculture's Cal Cannabis Enforcement Division's cultivation site inspection programs. So far, we have completed 50 site inspections this year for the pilot program.

We will provide pesticide and safety training workshops for agricultural businesses and licensed cannabis cultivators on existing and new pesticide regulations. We will continue to support our staff to become accredited certification officials through the United States Department of Agriculture's Export Services Program in order to inspect and certify agricultural exports. I'm pleased to share that two of our staff have recently received that certification.

All of the new positions that will be involved with regulating the cannabis industry are filled and will be fully integrated into the program. We will be inspecting 7,000 registered commercial weighing measuring devices for accuracy which is required by law every year. In addition we will conduct price accuracy inspections at 725 retail businesses throughout the year.

Our carpentry office moved to a new location but remains in Carpinteria and our solving office moved to a new location in Bulton. Both locations are open for business and provide more square footage for hosting training events, and office space for staff that are assigned to the new offices full-time. The new locations will provide better customer service and enhance our regulatory presence in the area.

Our department's renewed 22 transformation efforts have resulted in better efficiencies that will allow staff to meet all program objectives regardless of several vacancies we had this year. And staff continue to volunteer and support the EOC during natural disasters, and support federal agencies with recovery efforts for the agricultural community. Our objectives for 19-20 fiscal year include implementing a new regulatory program with the California Department of Food and Agriculture, also CDFA, that will educate commercial beekeepers on registration requirements, how to prevent theft of beehives, and maintaining healthy bees.

With the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, the United States Department of Agriculture USDA is a lead agency to administer the new USDA hemp production program. USDA's in the process of working toward developing regulations to implement the 2018 Farm Bill provisions which will include each state having a certified hemp regulatory program Draft regulation should be available for public comment in the fall of 2019 and be implemented for the 2020 hemp cultivation season.

CDFA intends to work with county agricultural departments to identify regulatory responsibilities for the new program. Our staff will be trained on new testing procedures and equipment to test commercial electric vehicle charging stations for accuracy. Currently, there are about 100 locations throughout the county that have commercial charging stations. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation and US EPA Region 9 Office will be piloting a new mobile device application that streamlines the process for field workers to report pesticide related complaints directly to DPR, and then county agricultural commissioners to investigate.

We will continue to pilot the Cal Cannabis Enforcement Site inspection procedures and provide support to state enforcement staff with non-compliance issues. Our department will be updating our internal new employee onboarding and training program and identify new resources to assist staff with their professional development needs. In order to improve efficiency and accuracy in our check depositing process, we'll be acquiring a multifunction check scanner system for administration staff.

We process over 2,000 checks per year. And we also will have our staff be devoting more of their time inspecting residential structural fumigations to ensure compliance and the safe use of pesticides. Our renewed 22 revision will support our mission statement by empowering our employees to deliver exceptional customer service in a courteous, respectful and responsive manner. And to demonstrate the highest standard of personal integrity, honesty and truthfulness in all of our professional activities.

Our rebalancing efforts include eliminating duplicative services for greater fiscal sustainability For example, homeowners are encouraged to utilize the UC master gardener program for assistance with their backyard pest management needs and structural pest control companies now submit their pests to the pest diagnostic laboratory at their own expense. Our redesign efforts focus on how to maximize our existing resources.

This resulted in the creation of a new combined biologist inspector classification that will enable qualified staff to be cross-trained and work on all agricultural weights and measure programs. We are currently developing a new Vital Sanitary Certificate Pilot Program that will simplify and expedite inspection services for agricultural exports. There are about 9,000 agricultural export inspections shipments every year.

We continue to respond to our customers with the highest quality of service Within our means by circulating monthly summaries, quarterly newsletters, updating our website, using social media, monthly staff meetings, press releases and expanded education and outreach sessions. We have implemented several new ideas to retain high performing employees. Examples include engaging staff to update and improve our internal onboarding training program, implementing an alternative 980 work schedule, reducing commute time by assigning staff to offices that they live nearby, and creating a monthly study group to support staff to obtain state licenses.

Our succession planning efforts include initiating a new leadership professional skills development plan to identify emerging leaders within our department and support the growth and development of their leadership skills. We are also participating in the new Leadership Certificate Pilot Program to assist Human Resources Department with developing a new mentorship program.

Our performance measures for 19-20 fiscal year include inspecting all of the farmers market in the county at least twice a year, complete 425 pesticide monitoring inspections and other performance measures include completing 100 education and outreach sessions Again, we will inspect all commercial weighing devices in the county and business locations with point of sale pricing systems.

I'm pleased to announce that there are no service level reductions for the department in FY19-20. In summary, for 19-20 fiscal year we will continue to provide pesticide safe handling education and outreach sessions to agricultural stakeholders and cannabis cultivators. The new office locations will enable us to provide more efficient public service, enhance our regulatory presence, and reduce commute time for the staff and the public.

In order to address staff retention and succession planning, we will provide support and prepare staff through education and training for licensing and professional development. That concludes our presentation. We'd be happy to answer any questions.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:50:47 · ≈ 3:50 PM

Okay. Do we have any questions from the board?

6:50 – 6:5411 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:50:52 · ≈ 3:50 PM

Supervisor Williams. I just want to publicly thank you for your graciousness with the carpentry facility that really enabled us Public health to move forward on opening a great space that is going to be beneficial for the mental health of the community there. And if you had been territorial about it, it probably wouldn't have happened or at least taken a long time and so I just want to publicly recognize that's kind of the one county spirit that Mona always talks about and you really exhibited it

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:51:29 · ≈ 3:51 PM

well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:51:30 · ≈ 3:51 PM

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:51:33 · ≈ 3:51 PM

Do we have any public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:51:35 · ≈ 3:51 PM

Chair Lavagnino and members of the board, we have no request to speak.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:51:37 · ≈ 3:51 PM

Okay, thank you very much. And Kathy, everything continues to get thrown at you, all the new stuff, cannabis, hemp, anything that's controversial seems to make its way to the Ag Commissioner's office now so I have to tell you out of all my department heads that come and visit me Kathy's always one step ahead of the problem and we're always talking about something that might become a problem instead of something that already is a problem. So it's very helpful for us. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:52:04 · ≈ 3:52 PM

You know, I've been kind of just meditating about all the other previous to the Ag Commissioner, all the other folks who came today, Justice Partners and Maybe it would be helpful now that we have additional staffing in the CEO's office for Barney to participate, or at least to monitor the progress that's been made in this question of how long it's taken people Get their court dates and come back and report to us at some point. I mean, it's kind of been the dominant theme of the day, the dominant issue of the day every single department before Kathy has talked about this today. And so it might,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:53:00 · ≈ 3:53 PM

I don't know what you guys think. Why don't we think about it and come back on Friday? And we'll talk about as we wrap up everything. What our takeaways are.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed6:53:09 · ≈ 3:53 PM

Chair Lavine and Supervisors, thank you. And I think Mr. Malachian does plan to have this public safety work group meet regularly and I think one of you requested some regular reports back to the board so we intend to do that. We don't need any board direction and we know that's a huge item on the continuances so thank you for bringing that up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:53:24 · ≈ 3:53 PM

Well I'm glad some other board member, I wonder who that was besides me requests that but I'm in

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:53:30 · ≈ 3:53 PM

full agreement of that. So just agenda management wise we're good with The Ed Commissioner's office. So we are going to take Community Services Department and then if we have time before 5 o'clock, we have planning development on deck and we will go to them if we can get done before five. But definitely homeless issue and libraries will be heard on Friday morning.

Mr. Chapjean, how are you today?

6:54 – 7:0612 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed6:54:02 · ≈ 3:54 PM

I'm doing good sir, how are you? Doing fantastic. Enjoyed the sun this afternoon?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:54:05 · ≈ 3:54 PM

Yes, a little suntan out there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed6:54:10 · ≈ 3:54 PM

Well, good afternoon Chair Lavagnino and members of the board. Let me introduce my staff who I really do want to thank for all the work they do throughout the year. They do a fantastic job. This is Ryder Bailey our CFO. Ashley Watkins who's in charge of the sustainability division. Sarah York Rubin our arts section head. Oh, Dinah, I didn't think Dinah was going to be here she has a plane to catch soon. Dinah Lockhart, HCD and Jeff Rapwell.

Jeff Rapwell sorry Jeff. Jeff Lindgren! I was thinking money. I was just

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.876:54:38 · ≈ 3:54 PM

thinking money. That's smart to name somebody in your department after Jeff. It's giving you a little more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed6:54:44 · ≈ 3:54 PM

allocation there. That's what I get for having money on my mind, and Sherman Williams and Stephen Fong. I'm going to start by saying thank you to all of the members of the board for being here today. And thank you to Andrew Kish back there so let me just as you know, the our department is 5 sections administration parks and open space housing community development community support and sustainability division which We've got a pretty dynamic department, as you know, with many exciting projects. But we also face some challenges in the coming years. Let me just start by talking about our park system. The investment in a robust park system is beneficial for community in many ways. Parks promote improved physical and mental health well-being.

Our parks are destinations for non county residents and as such have a multiplier effect to our economy. Those people who come to our community to recreate, they spend their money at our restaurants, hotels and local shops. Our protection of the county's land, water, trees, open space and wildlife helps improve the air and water quality of our community. And research has consistently demonstrated that homes and properties located near parkland have higher values than those farther away. So we continue to invest in our parks by addressing the significant backlog of deferred maintenance and are thankful to the board for this approved funding.

Bullet two is our housing and community development division's challenges. Homeless programs continue to increase in their complexities, but have recently also received renewed interest and effort at the federal, state, and local levels. The county has done exceptionally well in applying for and administering available federal and state homeless funding. And recently we received 10 million from the state as you know, and have begun contracting with local community based organizations and government agencies to address homelessness.

County library remains an issue, rising costs and recent reliance on reserves to maintain service levels is straining the system. And may result in reduced hours in programming but I think we'll get to that Friday as we talk about special issues for the libraries. The sustainability division continues to work with other departments and community partners to drive down carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions in line with the county's energy and climate action plan.

As you heard last December, unfortunately our emissions are trending up when they're supposed to be going down. And with the board's recently adopted more aggressive goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 50% below 1990 levels by 2030, division is going to need the continued support of the board and the community at large to achieve such a challenging goal.

Our summary, our operating budget is approximately $35.4 million with 88 and a half full-time equivalent positions. Of that $35 million only $11.9 million is general fund support but it's also important to know and I think we say this every year that over 5 million of that 11.9 million gets passed through to the community for library and human services and a lesser amount for homeless shelters and Chamber of Commerce contracts.

On our revenue side, I have to say I'm really proud of all our staff and what we've been doing. And that we've been doing a great job increasing revenue and constantly exploring new sources of revenue. And I'll expand on our expansion requests on later slide. So our capital projects, the Kachuma Lake RV renovation and thank you for approving that. It's going to be very important to us. The enhancements are expected to increase revenue by $500,000 annually.

Improved amenities and amperages, we're going from 30 amps to 50 amps is a trend for big RVs. And the bigger RVs require that kind of power. We currently can't accommodate the big RVs which means we're losing that business to others but the renovations are gonna allow us to attract more of the high-end rigs and the revenue associated with these RVers. Halama Affordable Cabins, once completed, can be expected to conservatively increase revenue at Halama by $100,000 annually.

The ranger station at Arroyo Borough will improve rangers' presence and safety at the heavily used park. Again this is doubly important for us because Royal Borough, the restaurant is one of our top revenue producers. Lastly we received the state grant to renovate the Kachuma Fireside Theater Staff is continually seeking to improve and add new amenities at Kachuma Lake to increase the customer experience there and drive more revenue So as part of my renewed 22 to retain I'm gonna turn this over to Ryder Bailey our CFO And he's gonna go through some of the because he hasn't done this before This is the first year thing the prior years. I was doing in the entire thing so he's gonna finish a I'm sure he's gonna

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:59:21 · ≈ 3:59 PM

freak out and choke.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed6:59:22 · ≈ 3:59 PM

Yeah, he's gonna finish it. I'll finish the presentation. He's gonna do the financials

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:59:28 · ≈ 3:59 PM

Thanks George good afternoon supervisors and no pressure supervisor Williams thanks for that So we'll go on to sources of funds most noteworthy sources of revenues on this pie chart are general fund contribution and Decreases the fund balance and our charges for services. GFC, General Fund Contribution is our department's largest source. Again as George just mentioned of the nearly $12 million that you give us 5 1⁄2 million is passed through to our library system, Human Services Commission, homeless shelters and warming centers in our fulfillment at Chambers of Commerce program.

Decreases the fund balance at $11.1 million. This is mostly within our housing division. As we draw up fund balances, home loan repayments and in lieu fees collected from developers, we apply those towards local affordable housing projects. And lastly, our charges for services. Now this is our revenue. We're budgeting $8.9 million for fiscal year 19-20 and this has been trending up the past few years.

This includes our camping, tents, RV's, cabins, yurts, day use revenues, our concessionaires or restaurant revenues. This uptick over the past few years is due to several factors. The implementation of our online reservation system, our successful Reservation Call Center We've also added additional amenities at Kachuma Lake such as our remodeled recreation hall, a tournament-worthy disc golf course and we've done a little bit better increasing our marketing out there.

We also think the recent rains which have increased our lake level to 80% will attract even more people to Lake Kachuma. On this slide you'll see our five divisions. Parks is our largest division, followed by Housing and Community Support, our Sustainability Division and then Administration. Parks as you know is a blend of many programs including our camping parks, day use parks, trails, capital projects, special events and weddings, and our Junior Lifeguard Program.

Our Housing Division They leverage local and federal dollars. We're currently leveraging an impressive 12 to 1, which assists community-based organizations, nonprofit developers to have a larger impact on our community. Community support as George mentioned is largely our library pass through, human services commission pass through, warming centers in our chambers of commerce and tourism boards, as well as our office of arts and culture. Our sustainability division leads a number of programs This includes our 3C-REN, our Tri-County Regional Energy Network. We're really proud of that accomplishment as we are the newest and only the third REN in the state.

Our Sustainability Division also has the responsibility for the county's energy and climate action plan, community choice energy exploration, and strategic energy planning. Onto our staffing summary, our FTE count has remained roughly flat the past four years With the increase year-over-year of two and a half FTEs for homeless programs funded by state grants, one new custodian position and the restoration of a park planner position.

Our 19-20 recommended budget shows a $2.3 million increase in operational revenues. This is driven by our increased park user fee revenue and our housing division's HUD, federal and state revenues. I'd like to highlight the variances year over year on this chart are driven by the timing of the completion of HUD funded projects, HUD funded federally funded housing projects.

And then our GFC five-year summary. You'll see our GFC increase slightly year over year. This is driven by the CEO's policy to partially offset our salary and benefit growth, as well as your board's policy to keep the per capita funding for libraries level. I'd like to highlight the increase from 1718 to 1819 is driven by the transfer of the Human Services Commission and the Women's Commission functions from the CEO's office to community services.

I hope I didn't screw that up. It's on to you George. Guess we'll grade

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:03:42 · ≈ 4:03 PM

him later. We're

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:03:44 · ≈ 4:03 PM

totally lost.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:03:48 · ≈ 4:03 PM

So for our anticipated accomplishments for parks, you know we upgraded the courthouse irrigation to save water. We soon will be awarding the Marina Cafe concessionaire contract. We're coming to you I think May 7 with that contract which will increase park revenue again and have a multiplier effect on day use and camping revenues at the park. We removed over 100 dead and dying trees and pruned over 300 more. Parks recently surveyed 2,100 trees and roughly two-thirds still require attention. We're in the process of surveying another 3,600 trees and expect the majority of those trees also to require some sort of attention.

Additionally, we're starting a countywide Master plan process and that'll be phase one and we'll also host a park summit meeting in June which will bring together cities stakeholders and local agencies to talk about parks Projects and just a master plan overall and prop 68 funding opportunities Housing. We've staffed the continuum of care funding process that awarded over 9 million in grant funds money That was all new to the county Arts continues to expand the availability of programming to all parts of the county, and the Sustainability Division has begun working with cities and stakeholders throughout the county to develop a regional strategy to address our climate change challenges.

We're grateful for the board's ongoing support as we try to work as one county in one community to make progress towards our greenhouse gas reduction goals. Our major maintenance accomplishments, we're thankful again to the Board for the deferred maintenance money received and completed over $2 million in maintenance projects last year. Here are a couple of pictures of the major maintenance work being done at Point Sal Culvert in road repair and the drilling of the Waller water well.

These are pictures of the work being done at both camping parks to replace the waterline infrastructure. These repairs are vital, of course, because the campgrounds generate a majority of the revenue for our Parks Division. 19-20 objectives for parks. We look to complete phase 1 and begin phase 2 of the countywide recreation master plan if that's approved And we continue to work with the California Coastal Commission from permits related to the rock revetment in Goleta Beach We expect the coastal commission to make their decision toward the end of the calendar year at which time will return to the board for direction Housing, we'd like to continue to improve our bed coverage reporting. Meaning getting more bed data into the Homeless Management Information System or also known as HMIS for a more complete comprehensive and up-to-the-minute data set.

Not all providers in the county are currently reporting this information however staff is continually working with providers to get their data in HMIS. For arts course will continue to deliver public arts countywide Stewarding the percent of arts funding and leveraging community support I'd like to emphasize our work in the North County and congratulate the recent poet laureate Winners who are both for both from North North County, and I think this is the second year that someone from the North County won the Poet Laureate Four years. Okay, so I'd like to think that's a direct result Get that

CommentTom FranklinProposedself-stated7:06:48 · ≈ 4:06 PM

one right

7:06 – 7:2030 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:06:51 · ≈ 4:06 PM

And with the sustainability, we'll launch a tri-county regional network which is only the third network in the state and engage other jurisdictions and stakeholders to jointly develop a climate action framework to help us achieve our 2030 greenhouse gas reduction targets. Renew 22, our department embraced Renew22 across all five core groups. Our department's mission statement is to provide community cultural recreational and environmental resources that sustain enhanced quality of life for all who live work and play in Santa Barbara County We're re-visioning by initiating a countywide park recreation master plan. Housing's HUD and state best practice of using HMIS real time data to better plan and address homeless persons needs, and connect them to services.

Arts initiated an arts and culture master plan. And our sustainability division plays an integral role in supporting the county's aggressive goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Our rebalance efforts focus on our core functions and areas of improvement such as the Kachuma RV renovation project. We are redesigning By upgrading to the latest version of our parks online reservation system and evaluating our ten boards, commissions and committees for potential efficiencies, consolidations or improvements. For example we have a county trails committee with representatives from all five supervisorial districts and an Orca Trails Commission that seem to overlap in responsibility. We're looking at possibly recommending consolidation of these two bodies to your board in the near future.

We are responding to the needs of our customers and constituents through our highly successful call center, and recent unveiling of surveys seeking customer feedback. And lastly under retain we actively encourage our staff to continually develop and learn through the county's employee university in other relevant training and conferences. So in the spirit of Renew 22, we'll continue to seek responsibly to monetize our assets. To increase revenues and implement operational efficiencies to mitigate impacts to the general fund while providing exceptional experience to all of our visitors.

Our performance measures Our call center continues to be a success, answering 15,000 calls a year. Nearly three quarters of those calls are answered within 20 seconds. Occupancy at Kachuma Lake is rising thanks in part to the increased marketing campaign, lake cruises, disc golf and other amenities. We think the lake has yet more to offer. We're exploring the potential of adding a small beach area and allowing swimming in the lake. We think this will drive revenue even more at the lake. The percentage increase you see up there is really an important goal for us. Each percentage increase translates to $60,000 annually a year.

HMIS data collection and quality is getting better. This is a HUD requirement, and it results in higher quality and real-time data. And higher quality data makes us more competitive for additional federal homeless funding. The real-time data in HMIS helps homeless providers also access data from other partners in real time. Our fiscal staff continues to actively monitor our loan portfolio and pursue repayments. This has enabled us to collect and recycle $1 million a year in our community to be spent on additional affordable housing projects.

And the role of library continues to be critical function in our community and increasing circulation supports that. Happy to report no service level reductions for us. In our expansion requests, countywide library will talk about that Friday. Number two is a CCE phase three. We're waiting for the results of the updated financial analysis on whether CCE is still viable option for Santa Barbara County in the light of significant regulatory and policy changes at the state level.

I think we should have that report back in May, early May. There's just been some delays because of the state CPUC rulings. If the new study comes back positive, the Sustainability Division is requesting $750,000 for a total of $1.4 million for the third and final phase of CCE development and launch. Approximately $650,000 remains from funds previously approved by your board for earlier phases of CCE program development.

A climate action plan on December 11, 2018. The board received an update on the ECAP and adopted an aggressive new greenhouse gas reduction target of 50% below 1990 levels by 2030. The board also directed staff to employ a regional approach to updating the ECAP inclusive interested neighboring jurisdictions and community stakeholders. To meet the new goal and take a regional approach, CSD will need additional funding for consulting services and supplies.

Staff estimates it will cost an additional $324,000 spread across two fiscal years to conduct the inter-jurisdictional multi-stakeholder collaboration required to update ECAP and meet the newly adopted greenhouse gas goal reductions. In summary, The Countywide Recreation Master Plan would provide an inventory of recreational facilities and programs describing existing, unmet, and future needs through extensive public outreach, identify opportunities for future facilities with an implementation and financing strategy, recognize the economic impact of recreation within a county, and provide program-level environmental analysis for future projects. This plan will assist us with the identification of early action projects across the county that are eligible for 254 million in California Prop 68 funding.

Sorry. In summary, staff continues to look for opportunities to increase revenues. Our sustainability division will collaborate with long range planning to address your board's aggressive targets. The Office of Arts and Culture will continue to offer dynamic programming presence county wide. And we see continuous the opportunity at Kachuma Lake and we're looking for opportunities at Kachuma Lake and we're excited about the RV park renovation and what that may bring to the lake.

And with that Quote, you know I really wanted mr. DeMille. I'm ready for my close-up but Ryder wouldn't let me put that in there But unlike most other park systems throughout the state we generate nearly three quarters of our funding through camping user fees and concessionaires And we haven't continued to invest in our camping parks with new activities amenities upgraded infrastructure a new cafe Kachuma This along with rising lake levels shows that people who seek affordable, fun and safe outdoor recreation with additional investments in the RV area and Kachuma Lake through the county's COP process. We believe the future of Kachuma Lake and parks will be even brighter as evidenced by this photo there is a pot of gold at the lake.

And that was not doctored, that is a real photo by the way. That wasn't photoshopped.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:13:37 · ≈ 4:13 PM

Thank you very much. I have a couple of questions, one of them is about the RV COP project. You know at $12 million at $500,000 return a year we both looked at each other and were like wow that's 24 years for a return. Is that scalable? I mean can we do half of those or is it that we have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:14:00 · ≈ 4:14 PM

Supervisor, I don't think it's scalable. I think because there's infrastructure there right? You have to build out the entire infrastructure and that's a majority of the work You have to new lay new electric lines new power supplies So it isn't scalable unfortunately

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:14:18 · ≈ 4:14 PM

The other question I had was maybe I don' understand percent of occupancy so It says we're at 22% and going to 30. Is that what's open or what's used? So is it 70% empty and 30% used, or is it 30%

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:14:33 · ≈ 4:14 PM

booked? Well, it's an average year round so during the summer and weekends it's booked. So we're trying to get people in there as much as we can during the...

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:14:42 · ≈ 4:14 PM

Off season.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:14:42 · ≈ 4:14 PM

Yeah.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:14:43 · ≈ 4:14 PM

Okay. But if I try to go out there in the summer it's gonna be...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:14:47 · ≈ 4:14 PM

It's gonna be packed. Okay.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:14:49 · ≈ 4:14 PM

I stopped by the other day and took a little tour

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:14:53 · ≈ 4:14 PM

Looks great

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:14:53 · ≈ 4:14 PM

doesn't it? It looks awesome, yeah. I'm a real outdoorsman. Don't laugh. Actually took a ride on the lake and everything. It was pretty fun. It was a good time. There's a lot out there right now. So do we have any questions or comments from the board? Supervisor Williams

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:15:13 · ≈ 4:15 PM

and just I really think our parks have great potential. And I mean as a someone who grew up locally, I can't think of cooler places to hang out than Halama Beach and Lake Kachuma you know, I mean these are You know that we used to really undervalue them. You know, I mean it was nice as a community service but not Unpleasantly surprised last year that we you know kind of you know price for demand a little bit, you know That's and that's and that's and that's good for the sustainability of this system

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:16:00 · ≈ 4:16 PM

And supervisor Williams. It does help us support the rest of the the park system to the free Park System

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:16:06 · ≈ 4:16 PM

So couple other things so I noticed that we have set aside five hundred thousand dollars for tree maintenance in our budget This year does that get us all your trees taken care of. At this point it doesn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed7:16:19 · ≈ 4:16 PM

take care of all the trees so this is going to be an ongoing okay. Show something else.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:16:31 · ≈ 4:16 PM

What you mentioned about swimming. That's still I mean why there's nothing that I missed right we're still

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:16:39 · ≈ 4:16 PM

No, Chair Lavagnier you haven't missed it. I think we've been talking about it internally. We've had a brief discussion last year with the COEM executive director. This is something we want to pursue and we're going to actively pursue it.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:16:54 · ≈ 4:16 PM

But it's not a decision we're making. I just want people to understand we're not the ones saying you can't swim

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:16:58 · ≈ 4:16 PM

there. Right. No, no, no. The board is not actually. We're going to come back to the board and ask for your approval to do that. Right? To pursue it.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:17:05 · ≈ 4:17 PM

Cool. All right. Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:17:09 · ≈ 4:17 PM

Thank you. Well, I'm really excited about the Parks Master Plan in particular because I think as everyone noted it does offer revenue generation capacity and while the theme today has been incremental change brick by brick If you don't have a bigger vision in mind, where you place those bricks is problematic and you may not end up with something coherent. So I think it really is an opportunity to step back and look at what we have, what the growing needs are, and try to engage our municipal partners as well in this And that way we can tell a much better story as we apply for Prop 68 grants, and so we're positioning ourselves for that.

I was rather distressed really as we begin to look at some areas like say Halama There are many plans that are sitting on the shelf, many specific plans for different parks. But what's really exciting about this is that the programmatic EIR will get us a big step towards actually implementing and I think that's something we all want to see and if I didn't mention it, we have Nahowi and Barone Ranch We have tremendous opportunities and real unmet demand. And so I think this is a really tremendous investment in our future.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:18:36 · ≈ 4:18 PM

Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:18:38 · ≈ 4:18 PM

Well, I just wanted to say that I do think that even though there is a fund balance in the that you guys have with CCE. I do think that just in case it might be intelligent for us to put a little bit in the fund. So that we're ready and that we're not caught off guard by the study. And obviously, to continue our participation with the other partners in the county is also important to me that we

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:19:14 · ≈ 4:19 PM

continue that effort. But you're gonna come back to us before June and tell us Give us an update.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed7:19:22 · ≈ 4:19 PM

Chair Lavenier, yes, the consultant will come back with a report. Okay, Supervisor Hart?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:19:29 · ≈ 4:19 PM

I just wanted to say as well, number three, the regional climate collaborative. There's been some absolutely superb work done. Much of it started in South County but now it's working its way towards North County and I'm extremely supportive of that again. It's leveraging, it's collaborating, it creating a county-wide vision about what we all can do together and I think that's absolutely necessary if we're going to address our ECAP goals so A call out to Ashley for all the hard work you've done in your whole department. And thank you and I'm supportive of that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed7:20:05 · ≈ 4:20 PM

Great, okay do we have any public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:20:09 · ≈ 4:20 PM

Chair Lavagnino members of the board we have no request to speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed7:20:13 · ≈ 4:20 PM

All right very good thank you very much.

7:20 – 7:356 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:20:41 · ≈ 4:20 PM

Okay, we are going to go ahead and move towards planning and development with our newest director Lisa Plowman.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:21:07 · ≈ 4:21 PM

Good afternoon, Chair Lavagnino and members of the board. I'm pleased to be here today. I have my team here. I have Krista Ryder, Steve Mason, Jeff Wilson and Dan Clemon to be able to respond any questions that you might have. Planning and development includes five budget programs administration support permitting coastal mitigation code enforcement and long range planning.

So the key challenges and emerging issues that our department is facing right now is cannabis permitting and enforcement and compliance programs. We've seen, obviously a steep increase in permit applications coming into the department based on the timelines that non-conforming Producers have to meet in May and June and we anticipate permits to continue coming in subsequent to that So we we are we are getting prepared to address the permitting process for cannabis The second one is attracting training and retaining staff We had seen some attrition in the department in the past And I'd say over the last four years. The department has been putting a significant amount of effort into Developing training programs, a leadership academy and other items to work on retention.

And then the development and adoption of our complex land use codes and programs through the Long Range Planning Division wanting to make sure that we can move those things through the process as quickly as possible and bringing them in on time. This slide reflects a summary of our operating budget. It's about nearly $24 million. We have capital expenditure this year for Acela disaster recovery server, so we'll be upgrading and replacement in the department.

We have a general fund contribution of roughly 3.3 million. So this slide reflects the source of funds for the department. By and large, the main source of funding comes from licenses permits and franchises. So this includes building a safeties permit fees land use cannabis energy. And then the second largest really is the charges for services, which is really the EIRs that are funded by private applicants in our programs.

We have decreases to our fund balances of about just almost $4 million and that includes uses For the halalma cabins, the cref funding. Offsite monitoring or I'm sorry off site mitigation and grant funding. And then we have some administrative costs for vehicle replacement and workplace safety upgrades. Use of our operating funds. So essentially, our operating funds go to cover salaries and benefits. But we also have in our administration technical costs for upgrades of physical improvements to the building or our workspace. We have succession planning efforts that we're undertaking.

And then in permitting, we have again the salary and benefits and the applicant funded EIRs that takes up the $15 million. And then under coastal mitigation, we have covered the salary and benefits and then the CREF grants. And then code enforcement and our long-range planning at $3.4 million. And that also includes some of our projects that require consultants such as the SoCal Gas Advanced Metering Program, Union Valley Parkway project circulation element and safety element.

So in terms of staffing, we are proposing to maintain a staffing level that is current with this current fiscal year and the next fiscal year. So we don't have any changes there although I do want to mention that subsequent to preparation for the workshops, we've been working with the CEO's office and have received approval to add two positions for cannabis which will be cost recovery positions.

Next slide. So our operating...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:25:56 · ≈ 4:25 PM

That's two more, two additional

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:25:58 · ≈ 4:25 PM

folks. And I'll go into more detail about that. Thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:26:00 · ≈ 4:26 PM

Thank you.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:26:00 · ≈ 4:26 PM

Yes. A five-year summary of our operating revenue shows that we've been on an increase from 2015 to the present. We did have a fee, we had fee increases that brought us to near cost recovery so you can see The increase in our operating revenue going up slightly, and then this year it goes up slightly about $900,000 due to the CPI increase. And that's offset the salary increases With respect to our general fund contribution, that has since 2016 been decreasing.

And this year we had a reduction in about $260,000 and we have offset that reduction through revenues from permits, one-time funds, use of one time funds and salary savings. So for this year, we have some anticipated accomplishments. One is we provided support for the rebuilding efforts that were resulting from the Thomas fire and the Montecito debris flow. The department received an award from a planning organization for our online interactive mapping that followed the debris flow.

We completed the update to the IV bluffs policy We fully participated in the cannabis enforcement team, and I just want to take a minute and talk a little bit about that. The Planning and Development staff has been partnering very closely with the Sheriff, the DA's office, County Council, the Ag Commissioner, the CEO's office and the State and occasionally California Department of Fish and Wildlife on enforcement efforts. And we have a number of ongoing enforcement efforts and we've had several successes in bringing people into compliance and there's a number that are still underway.

The department processed over 1400 zoning permits and 3800 building permits. We upgraded the web page to be more user-friendly, and that is actually going to be going online next week. I've had a chance to review it, and as a former outside user, I can tell you that the new website I think is gonna be a real blessing for the people who are trying to use the website.

They've done a great job. We developed a leadership development academy to strengthen staff's leadership skills And continued the employee engagement efforts in developing positive motivators for staff and mentoring and training programs. Some of our other anticipated accomplishments include completing certain programs through the Coastal Commission certification process, and that includes the Gaviota Plan, the Cannabis Ordinance, amendments to the Highway 101 HOV lane project The Montecito design guidelines and the excess accessory dwelling unit ordinance.

And actually, we will be coming back to the board very shortly with the acceptance of the minor modifications that Coastal Commission staff had on that last program. We've completed local adoption of several programs, the Eastern Goleta Valley update to the sensitive riparian corridor overlay map. The Ag Employee Dwelling Ordinance and the Coastal Resiliency Project. Those two last items are currently under review at the Coastal Commission. We expect that the Agricultural Employee Dwelling Ordinance, they will provide comments to us by Summer fall and then for coastal resiliency. They will provide them by fall winter is what they anticipated we also completed hoops as you well know And then in terms of permitting and development projects We are continuing and will continue obviously to process the cannabis permits we have issued one canvas permit I believe at this date And then we have issued the permit for the debris flow nets for Montecito.

The Kuyama Utility Scale Solar Project has been approved, and Lompoc Stone Reclamation Plan has been approved. That was recently at your board. So in terms of our long-term objectives for the next fiscal year, we are looking at local adoption of a cannabis ordinance in the inland area addressing Ag One zoned areas. The short term rental homestay ordinance amendments to the coastal zone and the telecommunications ordinance amendments that will address Southern California Gases advanced metering program.

With respect for Coastal Commission certification, as I mentioned we're looking at the Ag Employee Dwelling Units and the coastal resiliency. We'll be completing a vulnerability assessment and adaptation plan for the safety element and the vulnerability assessment includes Us determining where we are vulnerable with respect to things like vegetation and for management for fire, flooding and debris flow. So we will be looking at all those vulnerabilities and including those in our safety element and addressing them. We've applied for a Cal OES grant to cover the work for the vulnerability assessment and hopefully we'll be getting that.

We're adopting a, I don't know how many of you know this but the CEQA guidelines have changed state and we'll no longer be using level of service as the threshold to determine whether there's a traffic impact for a project. We are now moving to what they call vehicle miles traveled. And then we are going to be working to adopt a threshold that is consistent with that guidance from the state. The goal of vehicle miles traveled is more or less, to encourage infill in urban areas. So the idea is that if you develop in your urban core and you have people that have services and housing next to one another, they don't have to travel great distances creating More greenhouse gases and resulting in climate change being essentially less of an environmental impact.

Then we'll complete the local adoption of ordinance amendments to address sort of the rapid changes that are happening at the state level with respect to housing. We will continue to support the rebuilding and recovery efforts in Montecito after those recent natural disasters. We know that there'll be people applying for permits, and they've been coming in slowly but surely, and we anticipate they will continue to come in as people work out issues with their insurance companies.

We will continue to do the permitting and enforcement and compliance associated with cannabis. As we mentioned, we are all anticipating a significant Submittal of applications as as people try to come into conformance and then new growers are working to develop Grows outside of the coastal zone areas as well. We will continue in our efforts within staff and retention and development we're creating an onboarding program that that will be provided to each new employee as they come into the department, so it's really sort of a Introduction to the department in addition to the operations of In this next fiscal year, I think the Leadership Academy, I've been informed was quite successful and resulted in a lot of really good information from staff as they're looking to seek training and identify issues that will help retain staff.

So I'm really looking forward to seeing the second effort in that vein. We'll be also developing implementing a training program for all new hires and existing staff so One of the key things that came out of that first leadership academy was training, was one of the most important things that staff felt was necessary in order to retain them. Giving them the tools and the knowledge that they need to do their jobs. And so our department has been putting a lot of effort into that and we will continue to.

We're going to be implementing a credit card option for payment for fees and invoices, and that's going to be coming this next fiscal year. And what that's going to do is really set us up to allow for the submittal for some online permits. We're going to start small with the online permits. We'll do small things like film permits or re-roofing so we can really test out how it's gonna work and then ultimately, we hope to expand that to the larger development applications.

We're going to continue to participate in the Natural Resource Damage Assessment for the Refugio Oil Spill. There's an opportunity for us to get some funding based on the loss of use for recreational facilities in the area after the oil spill. Some of those projects are the trails that are in the Gaviota Plan, I think and then Also improvements to Goleta Beach We're looking at the picnic areas and the parking lots and those types of things And so we're continuing to push to gain funding as a result of that

7:35 – 7:4012 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:35:46 · ≈ 4:35 PM

Supervisor Hartman

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:35:46 · ≈ 4:35 PM

problem.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:35:47 · ≈ 4:35 PM

Thank you I'm glad you brought that up is as I understand it The county has a seat at the table, but we're not actually an active participant Is is that correct?

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:35:58 · ≈ 4:35 PM

Well, we are working with the state on the issue. We just had a conference call with them recently. They're still negotiating with planes on it but we have submitted these projects as opportunities for funding. I think the state understands that the county took obviously the brunt of the impact and that there was a significant loss of use and so

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:36:23 · ≈ 4:36 PM

And I assume your P&D is coordinating with Mr. Chapchin's office in parks? We've not really had an opportunity to talk about this at the board, so I think it...I've talked to my partners but Goleta Beach as we move those boulders back and recreate I think we should go after it very aggressively. That that's a way forward and we, I think some board members were reluctant to spend any more money out of the county general fund on Goleta Beach but if we can get some of this money it would enable us to move more quickly For adaptive management there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:37:18 · ≈ 4:37 PM

Supervisor Williams. Well, I just want to chime in because I do think that That route is more sustainable from price wise in the long run because it means not Continuing to do battle with Both the Coastal Commission and the inevitable forces of nature You know, so I think you know that while. The the willingness to spend more money on this is been obviously severely tested and have one of been I'm a partner of yours in spirit even if not on this one.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:38:19 · ≈ 4:38 PM

Next slide shows the department's renewed 22 efforts. And I'm going to go into some more detail about some of these items, but in terms of our rebalancing efforts that the department has embraced is going forward with a full cost recovery effort for permit services that was done a few years ago. The general plan maintenance surcharge is something we're going to be looking at Increasing cost recovery for appeals is an issue that we're going to I'll talk a little bit more about that, too our online permitting tools as I mentioned is what we've upgraded our website and We're gonna be accepting credit cards and hopefully accepting simpler permits sooner rather than later And then in terms of our retention. I mentioned our on-board pro boarding program our leadership development Academy And development of the positive motivators.

So next so in terms of full cost recovery this is an ongoing effort we set the permit fees a level to recover all the costs that are allowed and we will be regularly review those costs and will try and adjust our fees on a consistent basis and then In terms of our long-range work program, we are consistently assessing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:39:46 · ≈ 4:39 PM

I just want to make an editorial comment on, you know, I don't want to sound like a North County supervisor but we do full cost recovery on permit applicants. But if you look at every time we do an appeal, you guys give us the price tag of what it costs and it's $15,000 and we charge 600 bucks for that appeal. I know full cost recovery is not what I'm asking for, but you know.

I do feel like we should be exploring incremental increases in appeal fees because it just $600 is ridiculous in my view.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:40:36 · ≈ 4:40 PM

Okay that's something I've been saying for a long time, but Mr. Gazzone always comes back

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:40:42 · ≈ 4:40 PM

to say there is a rule. You know let's not make perfect the enemy of the good it's a question of incremental growth in it. Got it. All right.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:40:50 · ≈ 4:40 PM

Supervisor Hartman? Yes. Supervisor Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:40:54 · ≈ 4:40 PM

Amen.

7:40 – 7:5119 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:40:57 · ≈ 4:40 PM

Right on. Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:41:03 · ≈ 4:41 PM

Oftentimes we rely on neighbors and surrounding people to be our eyes and ears in the field, because we don't have an active enforcement program. And sometimes they discover fraud on applications or things that we've missed. So if we do increase the cost and we find that actually we're relying on stuff We're relying on information and brought forward by the appellant who's had to put up this fee, then I think they ought to have their fee forgiven.

If it's been some mistake on our part that we haven't fully vetted the application and they've brought forward things that are falsified, they shouldn't have to pay to do that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:41:47 · ≈ 4:41 PM

Just like if somebody has a project and somebody else appeals it and just drags him through the mud for no reason at the end we should make the person that's appealing that pick up the entire cost of that. I'd be fine with that winner take all but I don't think that's legal. But I think we're kind of getting ourselves off the topic. I don' think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:42:09 · ≈ 4:42 PM

we are off topic

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:42:10 · ≈ 4:42 PM

this is kinda like the meeting. Well, I would love to but Mr. Gazzone is going to tell us give us some guidance here Mr. Gazzone

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed7:42:16 · ≈ 4:42 PM

Chair and supervisors, there has been a fair amount of litigation around the country on what's too much of an appeal fee that is then a bar to access. And the real outcome of that is at some number that's hard to determine then the remedy or the path of going through the board first before suing across the street in the Superior Court is no longer there. So we have provided advice on this before, but we'll dust that off and be ready to discuss it again. Okay, thank you very much. And maybe now I could come back just going back to Supervisor Hartman's comment before about the natural resource damage assessment process. I think what you're referring to there is that the county has had three different roles in that. The county through the district attorney's office had a criminal prosecution.

The county through the Board of Supervisors had civil litigation and the county is also secured a seat at the table as an advisor to the statutory trustee agencies. To help them have a better understanding of the on-the-ground realities of Santa Barbara County, and hopefully to steer some of the outcomes from the separate civil litigation process of the natural resource damage assessment process to some local remediation here in the county as opposed to out of area remediation.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:43:30 · ≈ 4:43 PM

So if I may ask, we have an advisory role at the table but we're not a trustee so we don't have a decision making role but we can inform the decision making.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed7:43:42 · ≈ 4:43 PM

That's correct. We shaped at the beginning of this working with the statutory federal and state trustee agencies, this seat at the table advisory role so that the county is not a voting member of it but has real time access to the process and we felt that getting good information to the trustees early would be more useful than some past experiences on oil spills

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:44:02 · ≈ 4:44 PM

And if I might just follow up, as I understand it there was a call for project proposals initially and that is still open. And I just want to make absolutely sure that the Goleta Beach, as we've defined it, the adaptive management piece of it is on that project list.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:44:25 · ≈ 4:44 PM

Mister chair supervisor Hartman I believe that it is I reviewed. I know that Diane black before she departed had sent a list in and we went over it again with them in our recent conference call so I can brief you more specifically if you're interested.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:44:43 · ≈ 4:44 PM

Supervisor Adam Yeah, I was just wondering if we could take a look at potential loser pays the prevailing party's fees. That would provide some incentive for everybody to settle these things before they get all the way to the end?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:45:04 · ≈ 4:45 PM

Totally agree so Mr. Gazzone is writing feverishly so I think when he comes back and provides us his opinion that'll be part of it.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:45:13 · ≈ 4:45 PM

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:45:13 · ≈ 4:45 PM

Perfect, thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:45:14 · ≈ 4:45 PM

You bet.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:45:15 · ≈ 4:45 PM

Thank you. So the other thing is that we're evaluating the long-range planning work program so we consistently assess the number of projects in the Long Range Planning Division. We provide quarterly updates as to our progress on those efforts. In this next fiscal year, we'll be reviewing the staffing needs to determine whether or not We have sufficient staffing to process these programs at a pace that would be something desired by the Board of Supervisors.

And then we always are investigating alternative funding sources what? Usually what we have been able to do is obtain grants for certain projects and we are going after grant funding as I mentioned For the safety element update for the vulnerability assessment and then we also after Going after some grant funding to help us with the ordinance amendments for the new housing laws that are coming into effect

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:46:21 · ≈ 4:46 PM

Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:46:23 · ≈ 4:46 PM

I just had a question about the circulation element. Is it just the environmental significance threshold that we're looking at or are we doing a broader look?

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:46:33 · ≈ 4:46 PM

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Hartman, we are doing a broader look on the update to the circulation element. Next item is our general plan maintenance surcharge. As you know, the state allows the county to charge a surcharge for our permits to update the general plan We currently charge a 5% fee on our building permits, and that generates approximately $200,000 a year for the department's budget.

So when we're looking at whether or not we were going to raise that surcharge just to give you information, 1% increase adds about $40,000 more per year. We'll be looking at as I mentioned this was on my next slide about the cost recovery for permit appeals. It does cost the department about or the county about $240,000 per year to process appeals and that equates to about 2 1⁄2 FTEs.

And just my own personal thoughts, I recognize that there's a real balance here that you have to strike. You want accessibility for people to be able to apply for or submit an appeal but you also don't want the bar to be so low that there are frivolous appeals that result in a lot of expenditure of staff time and money and applicant time and money. That's the balance that we have to strike when we're looking at this, and I'll be looking forward to input from county council's office on that.

As I mentioned about our updating online permitting tools, we do currently have what is called a citizen access portal which gives the public and applicants the opportunity to monitor the progress of their permit online And a couple of things that we have done relate to online mapping. This year, we had some successes with our cannabis mapping and then also as I mentioned, we won an award for the debris flow mapping that the department prepared.

I'm going to talk a little bit about some of our performance measures. I have six identified on the next two slides. We have generally been seeing an improvement in our performance, for instance with employee reviews we're up from 92.4% to 95.8%. There are, however, two performance measures that I've identified on these next few slides where we have seen a slight decrease in our performance. And that relates to providing initial planner feedback on staff issued permits within ten working days and then also the review of grading permits for less than 1,500 cubic yards.

And the decline by and large has been caused by the additional work that resulted from the debris flow. We essentially had our supervising grading inspector reassigned to the debris flow during critical time, and so that ended up resulting in us being able to not reply as quickly as we'd like to for grading plans less than 1,500 cubic feet. We expect to see increases in this coming fiscal year in those performance measure areas.

I do want to take a minute here. I think it's important to just acknowledge how much work planning and development staff did during the debris flow, as well as a lot of other county departments. But just speaking on behalf of the staff in our department, they were really committed and from an outsider's perspective, they did a tremendous job in helping that community work to recover from that disaster. So I think that's important to acknowledge.

And then in terms of service level reductions, we are not proposing any service level reductions in this next year's budget. As I mentioned, we have made up the reduction in the general fund contribution through permit revenues, one-time funding and salary savings. So recently when we came to the board with a long-range work program, we had a request to pull out the Farm State Ordinance Amendment from the Ag tiered permitting ordinance amendments.

And we are in the process of working towards that. It's to expedite that more quickly than the other ordinance amendments. We anticipate that the labor and consultant costs are about $115,000. That assumes a mitigated negative declaration or addendum. And we estimate that it will take about eight months of processing time in the coastal areas, it'll take longer because we're going to have to go through the process with them to approve it.

The department's working with the CEO right now to incorporate some general fund resources to cover those costs in our next budget.

7:51 – 7:5611 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:51:55 · ≈ 4:51 PM

Supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:51:56 · ≈ 4:51 PM

So a question just I mean is so was the $78,000 figure that you that your department provided us with before incorrect or was that an in-house estimate?

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:52:10 · ≈ 4:52 PM

That wasn't in. I'm sorry Mr. Chair Supervisor Williams That was an in house estimate for staff preparation and when we in order to expedite it We have to either add staff with ongoing funding source Or we have to bring in a consultant to help us with that I think we ought to do this because

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:52:43 · ≈ 4:52 PM

This is not what I meant to do. You know, like at all? When we bifurcated STRs and the farm stay and put the farm stay in the ag-tiered whatever, I didn't think we were basically making it illegal for years in the meantime I think it's a great opportunity. To to operate and you I won't speak for anybody else, but I feel like that was. This is sort of like. Something that just happened.

And shouldn't have happened and we should do our best to rectify Hey, come on. I thought you were the guy, the STR guy. Hey, I'm willing to go back. Chair, are you going to back me up here a little bit? Yo, come

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:53:43 · ≈ 4:53 PM

on. I would support this but I would love to see the whole thing come back since we've been talking about lack of revenue today all day. But anyway, let's, Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.837:53:52 · ≈ 4:53 PM

Well, I don't think we had any choice. We were thinking about them as a whole and homestay and farmstay. And then it came back that it had to be pursued this other direction. And if this is going to take 8 to 15 months, then how long does the ag tier permitting that you're doing take? People's livelihoods are on the line here. And I think that's a good point. But again, this kind of took off and did nobody came back to us and explain it. It's just delayed. And I've got lots of people in my office hours saying what's going on here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:54:33 · ≈ 4:54 PM

And also say specifically, I think the thing that was unclear when we debated this is I like the line in the sand To me, if our motivation is about housing and they have someone living there, there's not a problem. And so now farmstays that have a ranch hand living there are now no longer permittable Those so actually we're doing the opposite of what we intended to do because now. There's no point for the ranch and in some cases to keep on living there and having a job there because there's nobody coming

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:55:25 · ≈ 4:55 PM

Mister chair supervisor Williams I want to make just as a slight correction farm stays is more about like a bed and breakfast. So AG employee dwellings I'm just trying to make that very clear.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:56:05 · ≈ 4:56 PM

Let's let's stay on I know we're on a farmstay amendment but. Let's get to our presentation, I want to read because I've got arguments about it too and we could be here for a long time talking about farmstays stuff that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:56:20 · ≈ 4:56 PM

you don't need to argue with me what I'm agreeing with you partway yeah.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:56:25 · ≈ 4:56 PM

Mister chair I wanted to just address one comment that was made by supervisor Hartman the 15 months has 8 months is what we're anticipating. If we can move it along more quickly, we will. But just to do a mitigated negative declaration that's 3-4 months alone and so then you've got a hearing process and whatnot. So we'll do what we can to move it along as quickly as possible.

And bringing in an outside consultant is certainly going to help.

7:56 – 8:0314 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:56:59 · ≈ 4:56 PM

I don't like to encourage illegal activity but Guessing if somebody was out there doing a farm stay and somebody is coming to their house, would they call? Their neighbor might call on them. And it would go to Mr. Mason. And what would our response be? I would imagine it'd be difficult to say that you cannot have somebody living in your house.

GuestWasilewskiProposed · by introduction7:57:24 · ≈ 4:57 PM

Chair, that's a difficult area to enforce. All of these types of uses are very difficult to enforce and find an owner. And when do we arrive because these happen in the evenings and on weekends? Enforcement of this type of ordinance is a challenge. Right. Thank you.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:57:49 · ≈ 4:57 PM

So in summary, the key challenges for us next year as we talked about initially will be keeping pace with the cannabis permits that are coming in and the enforcement efforts that were going to be undertaking. I do want to take a minute to talk a little bit about our cannabis staffing Last year the board authorized the department to add five cannabis staff. Subsequent to that, the department has hired new people and reallocated staff into those five positions. Two and a half of them were enforcement and two-and-a-half were for permitting.

And then subsequent to that, the department allocated another 1.5 FTEs to permitting so right now we have a total of 6.5 FTEs working on cannabis issues. As I mentioned, the CEO's office has authorized that we can hire two more individuals that will help with the permitting process. Right now we have a Planner 1 and 2 recruitment open and shortly we'll have a Planner 3 recruitment open so we're actively working to hire people to help us and we understand that there's going to be a glut of permits and we want to do whatever we can to make things go as smoothly as possible.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:59:11 · ≈ 4:59 PM

So I have a question about that. So first off, I think just to clarify for the public too, these are people that are being paid for by the permit dollars so that the applicants are actually funding these positions.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:59:23 · ≈ 4:59 PM

That's

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:59:23 · ≈ 4:59 PM

correct.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed7:59:23 · ≈ 4:59 PM

They're cost recovery.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.877:59:24 · ≈ 4:59 PM

Right? They are cost recovery. The second thing is, I think this also brings up you know, that I think we all anticipate there's going to be a significant influx and even without that significant influx right now You know like we just had a case it's gonna go to the Planning Commission And because of how busy the planning commission is right now with a bunch of other things, including oil projects.

I don't think you can even get to the planning commission for like two and a half months. So this person that's in there right now is looking at a June end of June date at the planning commission and that's without this tsunami that's coming. I'm just curious if what the planning commissions strategy is going to be Because these oil projects aren't going away either. So you got ERG, you've got Petro Rock, you got Aero that are gonna come one after another and the speed that I've seen the Planning Commission deal with things whether good or bad at this point is snail-like and I'm just not sure we're gonna get through what the work to get done without adding meetings or those types of things. I'm just curious how How you see that looking out for the next six months to a year?

That how is the planning commission not going to just get bogged down in all of this activity.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed8:00:45 · ≈ 5:00 PM

Mr Chair, I do want to give Jeff Wilson who's our Planning Commission Secretary an opportunity to respond to that but just I do want to mention that there are many permits that will be staff issued permits. So hopefully those will go through the process and not have to go to the Planning Commission on an appeal. But there are conditional use permits that go to them, and I think we're going to have to work with the Planning Commission on helping them with their efficiency but I'd like to give Jeff an opportunity

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:01:15 · ≈ 5:01 PM

to respond. They require a C U P are the ones that are most controversial and the ones that we want to get a thumbs up or thumbs down on as quick as we can because I think a lot of these people. Are going to end up thumbs down and need a CUP and we kind of need to have that hearing so that we can. Fisher cut bait, you know, and so. Fix it.

CommentAnn AlmeyProposed · by introduction8:01:47 · ≈ 5:01 PM

Done. Okay. So Jerry, you adequately characterized one of the challenges that we're going to be facing this year that isn't on the slide of challenges is to manage all the multiple projects that are coming for the planning commission in addition long-range planning work projects that we wanted to take to hearing. The cannabis permits either the CEP's or on appeal as well as the oil projects so we do have a perfect storm of opportunities for growth this year in dealing with Working collaboratively with the Planning Commission. I think one of the strategies in lieu or besides having special hearings to manage this workload is really utilizing tools that we have already, especially at the projection report and coordinating with the planning commission and the current chair to identify these issues and manage the agendas to be able to look down the road and how are we going to address these things?

With the director and myself working with the chair on identifying approaches early on, and how we can help frame some of these issues so they can make decisions during the hearing. And find ways to minimize the continuances or ongoing hearings. And I think that's one of the things that we're working on in discussions that we're having is how do we frame issues to be able to get decisions out of the planning commission in moving forward?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:03:07 · ≈ 5:03 PM

Yeah, because we spent the whole day talking about how the court system continues and continues and continues. And we really don't control them but the one thing we do control at the Planning Commission things tend to run on and run on and run on so.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed8:03:20 · ≈ 5:03 PM

Mr Chair I think if necessary we would have to add hearings if they can't get their work done.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:03:25 · ≈ 5:03 PM

Yeah, I could even see just cannabis exclusive You know, I think that the.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

8:03 – 8:088 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:03:49 · ≈ 5:03 PM

Enforcement as we've noted before that enforcement on some scoff laws can be delayed by us. You know, and a CP application and it's so from my perspective it's good for both enforcement and good for You know, reputable applicants to speed the process as quickly as possible. It also happens to be good for resolution with the county and I think that should be a real important goal.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed8:04:22 · ≈ 5:04 PM

Thank you. The next bullet relates to the attract, train and retain staff and I've talked at great length about the efforts that the department is undertaking with Leadership Academy and the onboarding program. One of the other things that I'm going to be doing in my work with new Assistant Director Wilson We're looking at the staffing levels and the caseloads in the development review division because that is another issue that affects retention. Whether if they feel like, if staff feels like they're significantly overloaded and can't make any progress it can be quite discouraging a result in staff leaving so we'll be analyzing that to determine whether or not we would need to add cost recovery positions in that division.

Development and adoption of the projects, long-range planning projects, trying to move those as quickly as we can. We are trying to use outside consulting resources when we can to move things along more quickly. One of the things that I think is the tough question is more staff Can move things more quickly but that results in the need for ongoing funding for the department additional funding for the department and so in the interim we can work on getting one-time funds to hire consultants, but it's something that were greatly aware of and are working to try and process those things as quickly as possible. And I think our efforts in training with the Planning Commission to help them make decisions more efficiently will help that process And then we are going to continue to analyze and implement our new 22 initiatives.

And lastly, I just wanted to mention that we are going to continue working with...I know the emergency is over in Montecito but our staff is still really committed to working with the folks in the debris flow areas and helping them get back on their feet and getting their homes rebuilt. And with that concludes my presentation and we're happy to answer any questions.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:06:28 · ≈ 5:06 PM

Well we've held them all through your entire presentation so. Do we have any other ones that we would like to ask? All right is there any public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:06:39 · ≈ 5:06 PM

Chair Lavanino, members of the board we have no requests to speak.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed8:06:43 · ≈ 5:06 PM

Mr. Chair I did want to just say one more thing and that we have selected a quote for the end of our presentation From Albert Einstein, which is the world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking and I think Gandhi said something similar is be the change that you want to see. So we have to change our thinking to make change happen and we're committed to that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:07:10 · ≈ 5:07 PM

Awesome. Well they say you can't trust Einstein though because he couldn't get the I before E right twice in his name so something wrong there. I want to thank all the employees from P&D. It's been a heck of a year for you guys, and probably a heck of two years. And we do appreciate all the great work that you've done way above and beyond some of your job duties. So thank you very much. We appreciate it.

CommentLisa PlowmanProposed8:07:38 · ≈ 5:07 PM

And I'd like to think that all of the staff that's here today for getting me prepped for this meeting. They did a great job. So thank you very much.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.878:07:48 · ≈ 5:07 PM

All right, so we are going to just want to remind everybody that we continued both special issues which is issue of homelessness and libraries till Friday. They'll be the first thing in the morning and with that we will adjourn to Friday April 19th back here in Santa Barbara.