UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:035 turns
Yeah. Yeah. Although
yesterday. Yeah. Oh,
I
know well because I know it blows like this because we tried to put campaign signs out in May before the June election. Frickin all gone. All
right,
0:03 – 0:0812 turns
good morning everybody. I'd like to call this meeting of the County Board of Supervisors to order. Madam Chair can I get a roll call please?
Mr. Adam? Here. Mr. Williams?
Here.
Mr Hart? Here Ms. Hartman? Here
I am here.
Second.
Moved and seconded, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. You get a CEO's report please.
Good morning Chair Lavinino and board members. I have a couple of announcements to make. The first is in recognition of Mental Health Awareness Month the Behavioral Wellness Department is sponsoring a free showing of a motion picture entitled 55 Steps tonight in Santa Maria and in Santa Barbara. The film is based on the inspiring true story of a patient committed to a facility in San Francisco Community agencies will be on site with resource tables, and behavioral wellness is asking those attending the film to wear lime green if possible in recognition of mental health awareness. In Santa Barbara, the film will be shown at 8 p.m. at the County Courthouse Sunken Gardens. People can begin arriving at 6 p. m., and there will be food trucks scheduled.
In Santa Maria, the film is being shown at the Santa Maria Public Library at 6 pm. Doors open at 5 30, and complimentary hors d'oeuvres will be provided. Information is on our website And our Facebook page at County of SB. The second announcement is a recognition of our Green Business Program Certification. As you know, Public Works was the leader in green county buildings and it obtained the Green Business Program Certification in 2014 and was recertified in 2017 and now 2019 for the Naomi Schwartz Building at 130 East Victoria Street in the First District for low flow water efficiency upgrades, efficient lighting, and recycling.
Frances Gilliand with the Green Business Program of Santa Barbara County is here to present a certificate to Supervisor Williams and joining Francis is our Public Works staff Tyrone Lafay, Keilani Durham and Alan Nakashima.
Hi, thank you. Chair Lavagnino, members of the board, I'm Frances Gilliland. I have the pleasure to serve as the program director for the Green Business Program of Santa Barbara County. The Green Business Program provides resources and assistance to businesses wanting to be more sustainable, certifies businesses through workshops and trainings, on-site visits Evaluations and highlight certified businesses so local consumers can then shop green.
The county public works department, both resource recovery and waste management division and the water agency are leaders in this program. And honestly we wouldn't have a green business program if it wasn't for those two departments. I'm here today to present the certificate to them in honor of their recertification. The second recertification of the Naomi Schwartz building. They've also had the Santa Maria Service Center also certified and recertified.
Original certification is good for three years, and we look at water efficiency, energy efficiency, transportation, recycling, and purchasing. and pollution prevention. We go back after three years and make sure everybody's still keeping up with those standards, the people behind me make sure that that happens in the buildings where they work, notably the Naomi Schwartz building.
And I'm here today to present this certificate Supervisor Williams, but I also wanted to thank the three people standing behind me. You already mentioned Kalani Durham from the Water Agency Tyrone Le Fay from the Water Agency and also Alan Nakashima from Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division they not only Helped get their agency certified, but they helped keep the green business program running and I'd like to thank them for that
Thank you very much. That closes up CEO's report and just as a matter of housekeeping, if you're planning on speaking at public comment If you haven't filled out a slip, you'll need to do that before you be allowed to speak Those are in the back of the room. And with that, we will go to our resolutions. Can I get a motion to approve items A1 through A3?
So moved.
Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? They pass unanimously. Let's move to A1.
0:08 – 0:122 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, administrative item number one is sponsored by Supervisor Hart. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 19th, 2018 through May 25th, 2018 as National Emergency Medical Services Week and the day of May 22nd, 2019 as National EMS for Children Day. And if I can have Nicholas Clay to the podium? Whereas Emergency Medical Services is a vital public service and the members of emergency medical services teams consisting of emergency medical dispatchers, emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergencies medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators and others are ready to provide life-saving care to those in need 24 hours a day seven days a week.
And whereas access to quality emergency medical and trauma care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury for adults and children, recognizing that the needs of these populations are different. Thus the development of training programs and guidelines are specialized for children populations. And whereas the county's providers embody the values of the Santa Barbara County Emergency Medical Services System by ensuring community access in education providing hands only CPR and stop the bleed courses to the public, provider safety and support developing and delivering EMS education initiatives and clinical excellence becoming a national leader in cardiac arrest survival. And whereas the Emergency Medical Services Agency in collaboration with EMS system partners will be supporting various events in the county to promote child safety.
And whereas we honor and recognize the value and accomplishments of emergency medical services providers, and the contributors of these providers to keeping our residents safe and healthy going beyond the call designating Emergency Medical Services Week. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors does observe the week of May 19th through 25th 2019 as National EMS Week and May 22nd 2019 as National EMS for Children Day in the County of Santa Barbara passed and adopted today.
Chair Lavigno, members of the board. Good morning. My name is Nick Clay. I'm the director of the Emergency Medical Services Agency for the county. The EMS agency is proud to stand here today before you to receive this proclamation recognizing EMS Week and EMS for Children Day. EMS is a complex subject, has a lot of moving parts, means different things to different people.
But it's a service our community never has to question. They call 9-1-1, the call will be answered, a group of highly trained care providers will arrive quickly and the patient will be transported to an awaiting emergency department while they receive care from doctors and nurses. All this happens as a matter of routine. We never have to ask how. And this week is about recognizing these men and women who answer that call every single day.
It's about those behind the scenes who support the field care providers. And all of these folks and these dedicated professionals miss birthdays, anniversaries, holidays, there's kids school events to be there for the community. Also with this proclamation National EMS for Children Day on May 22nd we recognize a specialty designation that the Santa Barbara County EMS system maintains as an EMS for children system. We proudly ensure this special population is well cared for when in the hands of our EMS providers so thank you very much for this honor. Thank you Takes us to A2.
0:12 – 0:169 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, Administrative Item number two is sponsored by Supervisor Hart. And this is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring the 2018 through 2019 Dos Pueblos Mock Trial Team. And if I can have the Dos Pueblos Mock Trial team, the mock trial team coach deputy county counsel Lisa Rothstein and the mock trial team coach deputy public defender Christine Voss to the podium please?
And I'll go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas Dos Pueblos Mock Trial is recognized as a permanent team both statewide and nationally, and whereas this school year, Dos Pueblos Mock Trial placed fourth at the Empire World Championship and first at the Santa Barbara County Championship. And whereas in the last ten years, Dos Pueblos Mock Trial has won the Santa Barbara County Championship eight times, the California State Championship once, placing the top four in the Empire World Championship in New York four times And won the Empire World Championship once. And whereas the high school students that participate in mock trial dedicate hundreds of hours to learning through judicial systems, studying rules of evidence, practicing public speaking and exercising critical thinking.
And whereas Dos Pueblos Mock Trial has a tradition of excellence through which the students demonstrate civility, professionalism and graciousness in both victory and defeat. And whereas through mock trial these students become more engaged citizens and future leaders of our county state and country. Now therefore, be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors commends the Dos Pueblos Mock Trial Team. Albert Miao, Allison Mincer, Miles Krichmer, Sydney Frye, Marianne Mezek, Matthew Lindheim-Marx, Teresa Axelrod, Cooper Bully, Anastasia Fechner, Kelly Gilmore, Sari Yang, Nora Kelly, Phoebe Naughton, Devin Ross, Molly Sipes, Nina Steele, Marlee Stout, Marianna Sue and Natalie Tiavaras for their dedication hard work and commitment to excellence passed and adopted today.
Hello my name is Allie Mincer I'm a senior captain of the mock trial team
My name is Albert Miao, I am also a senior captain of the Dos Pueblos mock trial team.
So we'd like to thank Supervisor Hart and all of the members on the board for this very high honor and would also like to thank our coaches Ms. Rothstein, Ms. Voss and Dr. Miller for all the work they put in this year in the past several years they really put their heart and soul into this team and we're so thankful for them and for you for commending at this team
If you don't know what mock trial is, a mock trial team basically focuses on teaching law to high school students by having high school students emulate a court case with the prosecution, defense and witnesses and of course defendant. Over the past few years our mock trial team has done particularly well this year we have won the Santa Barbara County Competition and earlier this summer we placed fourth at the Empire Mock Trial Competition which is a national international level competition
DP MOC is an incredibly special program. These people on this team, they're amazing. We all become so close and the coaches there are so hardworking and they really care about all of us and it's so amazing that our team has or is able to be recognized at this level we thank you so much
Aside from the team bonding a mock trial also holds a special place in our hearts for teaching us something that a lot of people don't get to learn about specifically the law or even skills that will apply to other careers such as Public speaking. So thank you once again
You
know, the county is a Is an employer of many in the legal profession. So we'd like to see some of you filling out applications in a few years for county council's office, public defenders and our district attorney's office. Keep it local. All right so let's move on to A3 congratulations.
0:16 – 0:228 turns
Chair Lavinino members of the board administrative item number three is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino this is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 19th 2018 through May 25th, 2018 is National Public Works Week in Santa Barbara County. And if I can have Marika Rue, Matt Griffin, Todd Curtis, Alan Lemke and Richard Navarro. Whereas public works professionals focus on providing infrastructure facilities and services.
That are of vital importance to sustainability and resilient communities. Public health, a high quality of life and the well-being of the people of Santa Barbara County in a fiscally responsible manner. And whereas the infrastructure facilities and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals. We're engineers, accountants, technicians, environmental specialists, maintenance workers and administrative professionals to name a few at all levels of government and the private sector. And whereas the community is frequently unaware of the public works programs that are the foundation of our economy and everyday life such as the quality of roads on which they travel, the accuracy of their property boundaries, the reliability of streetlights in their neighborhoods, effective sewage treatment, the cost effectiveness Consistency and attention to sustainability of their recycling and trash disposal programs, water supply and conservation.
And community safety during flood events and the disaster recovery. And whereas it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders and children in Santa Barbara County to gain knowledge of and to maintain a progressive interest and understanding of the importance of Public Works and Public Works Programs in their respective communities. And whereas the year 2019 marks the 59th annual National Public Works Week Sponsored by the American Public Works Association and the Canadian Public Works Association. Now, therefore be it hereby resolved that this Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County do hereby designate the week of May 19th through 25th 2018 as National Public Works Week and invite all citizens to recognize the substantial contributions public works employees make in protecting our national health safety and quality of life passed and adopted today.
Thank you Mr. Chair and Board Members, and as the Clerk mentioned, Public Works Association is the proud sponsor of Public Works Week and this year's theme for 2019 is It Starts Here. And really the theme represents the many facets of modern civilization that grow out The efforts of public works professionals like the people that are behind me today and the APWA asks what starts here. And when you look at public works infrastructure starts with public works, innovation starts with public works, mobility certainly starts with public works and we're focused on that in healthy communities as well so the bottom line is really Our citizens' quality of life, in part, is due to some of the infrastructure and some of the services that we provide on a daily basis.
And I'm so proud to have these five folks behind me today. They represent 283 outstanding public works officials in our department. We have Matt Griffin from Water Resources. He's in charge of the Capital Improvement Program and he runs our Disaster Operations Center. We have Todd Curtis, who's currently responsible for building the $140 million Tegas Resource Recovery Project. Rich Navarro is our Central County Road Maintenance Superintendent. He's responsible for close to 600 lane miles operations and maintenance of roadway in the county. We're going to talk a little bit about the maps that we have in front of us. Alan Lemke he works in the county surveyors office, he's dealing with the maps and plans that come in every day and it's his responsibility to make sure what what shown on those maps is accurate at a fair representation of the property that private property owners as well as public agencies own.
And Marika Rue she's from administration she's in charge of all of our finance work and admin Thank you for this recognition. Supervisor
Hartman? Would you wait just one moment? Two things, first of all at the risk of creating unrealistic expectations I have to tell a little story about Isla Vista there was a tree that was lifting up the sidewalk a bridge that had decayed badly we brought it to Scott's attention one week later it was all fixed So that was tremendous. I also, we have a ribbon cutting coming up pretty soon would you care to announce that?
Yes, we are going to be doing a groundbreaking out at Tahecus for the official start of the Tahecus Resource Recovery Project. And then we're going to do a reopening if you will for Goleta Beach the following day next week because we had scheduled the ribbon cutting for the bridge and then the Thomas fire hit and then we rescheduled it and then we had the unfortunate debris flow so We held it off for a while, and we're going to go back out and reopen the bridge and celebrate those big projects. So thank you. Excellent. Supervisor Williams?
Well when it comes to emergency response, when it comes to just infrastructure maintenance or whether it comes to reducing carbon emissions, you guys really exemplify the can-do spirit of the county, and I really appreciate the work
Thank you excellent. All right so that takes care of our resolutions, so we will be taking the balance of the administrative agenda and is there any items that the board members would like to pull? Seeing none how about the public?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board we have no request to speak from the public on our administrative agenda
okay We'll call special, okay. So let's take A13 separate then. So if you could read A13 in please.
0:23 – 0:3023 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, item A13 is from the county executive office. This is to consider recommendations regarding proposed advocacy on SB 528 California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Review Task Force.
Okay, we're just calling for a separate vote on that.
Move approval.
Need a second?
Second.
Moved and seconded. Roll call please.
Mr. Adam? Aye. Mr Williams? Aye. Mr Hart? Aye Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Lavanino?
Aye
Motion passes 4 to 1 with one abstention.
Okay can I get a motion for the balance of the administrative agenda please? Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? They pass unanimously. Alright, that takes us to public comment. These are for items not on today's agenda. Speakers will be given three minutes. Just a reminder for those who are here for the first time for public comment there is no booing, cheering or outbursts from the crowd during any of these comments. We are grateful that you are engaged but we also ask you to be civil And so let's move forward.
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, we have 14 requests on general public comment today and we're going to begin in Santa Maria with Sarah McDonalds and then we're going to return here in Santa Barbara with Ed Kalaski. Sarah? You
have to press the button.
I'm sorry Sarah can you pause for a moment and impress the unmute button.
There's a.
That it
there you go
am I on
yes can you
hear me now
yeah
okay. Okay. Good morning. I'm here representing the faith communities and I'm supporting the supportive housing pilot program, and as I've written to you in support of CLUES Actions, I will read there to reinforce what I had sent you earlier Dear Supervisor, as a supporter of CLU Santa Barbara's justice work with the interfaith community I stand behind the supportive housing projects in the Public Safety Realignment Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2020 to be submitted by Community Corrections Partnership on May 21st.
Supportive housing provides compassionate and justice alternative to cycling through the jail for justice-involved individuals. I encourage planning ahead for the pilot housing project funding to be included in the ongoing budget as soon as possible. Thank you for recognizing the needs of the most vulnerable in our community. And along with this, there are quite a few vulnerable people up in the North County and we really, the faith communities stand behind this fully.
So I'm here supporting this action.
Thank you. Chair Lavinino, members of the board we're going to return to Santa Barbara with Ed Kalaski to be followed by Matthew Sevilla.
I'd like to reminisce very little and then state where I'm at with regard to my project. I've been trying to remodel my house, trying to locate the second story there over the dining room, the garage, the kitchen and laundry room for five years. The board had ruled that it was solely over the garage, and I had a meeting last May 3rd. And they never brought up the fact that they wrote a 64 page report over six months saying that their second story is located solely over the garage. They completely ignored that.
You know, they had the kids here with mock trial stuff. I thought you learn stuff in school and then you come here and it's two different worlds. And it's been truly two different worlds for me. With Janet Wolfe, it was impossible to do anything. It was clearly an obstruction of justice. It was something that Alex Pujo should have been fired. And it's taken five years to get here.
Well, on the third I had four members before me and they presented what they wanted from my structure which had nothing to do with being solely over the garage. They wanted me to do setbacks. Three of them, there were four members, three of them wanted a two-foot setback on the north and east wall. The other person wanted eight foot setback Which was a little unusual because he designed the streetscape, the view from the street.
It kind of leaves me lost a little bit in the third or fourth meeting my architect gave an outstanding speech on setbacks Stating that setbacks can be passed by ordinances in which the Board of Supervisors authorized setbacks. That was not done. Advisory boards, like the Board of Architectural Review cannot demand setbacks after that meeting or during that meeting I should say All seven members agreed that we did not need setbacks.
So I go downstairs, and now we're back in the point of issuing setbacks. We'll get this worked out now. I feel a lot better now today with the new board members. It's outstanding. Things have changed dramatically downstairs. And I pray that nobody ever has to go through Everything that I've had to go through. I've given 75 talks here and 50 talks downstairs, and until we got a new supervisor it was totally worthless. We appealed to the PC and we appealed to the board.
This is some of the reasons why I think Alex should be either prosecuted or fired. Thank you.
0:30 – 0:365 turns
Our next speaker is Matthew Sevilla to be followed by Mark Squires.
My name is Matthew Sevilla, and I have a small confession. I haven't really been the best son that I could be. I don't really hop around the house. I clean my room every other month, and I've stopped going with our parents on our weekly shopping trips. In my life of 17 years, I had a few regrets, and not listening to my parents more is definitely one of them. But I'm trying. I really am.
You see as I was growing up, the key word for me was responsibility. And in a way, I have been responsible. Each screw up, each mistake and each misstep was nothing if not my own. Of course not much of what I've done has an impact. I am just a high school kid after all. But I'm not here today to address other high school kids. I'm here to address a Board of Supervisors who, an entire county whose actions have real world implications and so I initially thought that a board of almost entirely SB natives would have SB best interests in mind but the recent entertainment by the board to these proposals of restarting drilling in Cat Canyon and other locations clearly proved me wrong And so I'm here today for myself and the land I spent my childhood in.
I'm here for the nearly 450,000 people in this county whose lives are directly impacted by your decisions. I am here for my future children, my neighbor's future children and all the future generations to be born here which brings me to the topic of my comment today. And so, I'm here today to talk to you all about how you need to take responsibility. Mr. Lavinino and Mr. Adam, you both have taken thousands of dollars from petroleum and fossil fuel companies in the past. And so I need you to think about whether or not your best interests really lie with the people of Santa Barbara County or the oil companies that fill your coffers. I need you both to think and take responsibilities because if you're going to actively take steps away from a renewable future for our children then wear it on your sleeve.
If you're going to risk devastation of our land and local ecosystems, I want to see that printed on your re-election posters in a few years. I want you to stand outside of proposed sites and tell those who grew up living and loving their land that you're going to be drilling it because that is responsibility and that is what my parents taught me. And for those here on the board who have been supportive of the ideals we preach today, I couldn't thank you more. I know my words don't really mean much but I hope that my vote does when I can vote as well as the votes of people who I pressure when the re-elections roll around again.
I understand that nobody can control the things that happen to them. Your generation politicians is the first to really be confronted with the consequences of climate change, but everyone can control what they do in response. Me standing here addressing you all today is my way of taking responsibility. I am after all trying to be a better son. And so it's not our fault that climate change is real and that humans are severely contributing to it. It's not our fault that oil is extremely energy dense and profitable, and it's not our fault the renewables have to be long-term to get the most value. But it is our fault if the oil drills that we build today leak and pollute the groundwater. It is our fault if the oil drills we make switching to renewables harder in the future, and it is our fault if we are known as a generation that helped kill the earth.
I want us to work together to tackle this problem. Regardless of how many lines are drawn in the sand between parties, how many donations are made by white groups and how many terms are had, it's still our land. Nothing will change that. Your children will grow up playing in our fields, drinking our water and breathing our air. Please act like it. That is a true meaning of responsibility. I'm trying to be a better son, a better son of my parents and a better son of the earth.
And I really hope you all surprised me today. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Mark Squires to be followed by Aloy Z.
Hi, I'm Mark Squires. I'm 15 years old and I'm from Goleta and I'd like to tell you what drove me to come here and voice my support for the Green New Deal Take action and fight for a future that is separate from what we're sort of headed towards right now. Um, so I've been really lucky in that. Uh, I've been able to travel with my family all over the world and see really, really beautiful things.
In particular, I got to snorkel in the Great Barrier Reef, half of which is bleached and dying. And when I When I was snorkeling there, it felt otherworldly. And so hearing that this beautiful part of nature that was just so amazing to look at was dying and that other people might not be able to experience the same thing. Made me feel really, really just sorrowful. And that's kind of when I started looking into climate change and the real world effects that it has on our lives and our children's lives. And so I'm here to urge you to take action and A future without fossil fuels and one that will leave your children and your grandchildren feeling like you did the right thing instead of generating value for shareholders or having your campaigns financed by oil lobbies.
And so, yeah, that's why I'm here today. That's it. Thanks.
Our next speaker is Aloy Z to be followed by Alina Salinas.
0:36 – 0:4812 turns
Hi, my name is Allalee. I'm a student here in Santa Barbara and I want to tell you why I decided to join this action today and call on you to fight for a Green New Deal. Growing up in Santa Barbara, I love going to the beach, I love hiking, and I love camping in this area. When the wildfires struck in 2017, I was sealed inside my home because of unsafe air for a whole month and I was away from everything that brings me joy not sure when I was going to end.
When the fires finally stopped and it was safe to be outside, the hiking trails were blocked and the beaches were polluted. I'm lucky to live in an area away from the flood path but many lost their homes in the subsequent mudslides. Like most things natural disasters hit communities of color way way harder Humans are a part of the environment too. Not only do we need justice for our planet, but we need to make sure that public policy be based on mutual respect and justice for all peoples free from any form discrimination or bias A federal Green New Deal legislation will create a detailed mobilization plan to, within a decade, achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions through fair and just transition for all communities and workers. Create millions of good high wage jobs to ensure prosperity and economic security for all people in the United States.
Invest in the infrastructure and industry of the United States to sustainably meet the challenges of the 21st century. Secure for all people of the United States for generations to come, clean air and water, climate and community resilience, healthy food, access to nature in a sustainable environment. And promote justice and equity by stopping current present future or preventing future and repairing historic oppressions of indigenous communities.
Communities of color, migrant communities, de-industrialized communities, depopulated rural communities. The poor low income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused people with disabilities and youth. Santa Barbara calling for the federal government to pass a Green New Deal will demonstrate widespread popular support for necessary and just climate action.
It is my hope that you will support this action To pass a Green New Deal based on the resolution released on February 7th, 2019 by Senator Ed Markley and Representative Alejandra Ocasio-Cortez. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Alina Salinas to be followed by Irene Cook.
Good morning! I hope you guys are doing well. Thank you Matthew, Mark and Aloy. You guys have really powerful words. So I'd like to read you all a letter I wrote based off of conversation that I had with my dad last week So last Thursday, I called him. Normally we talk about life updates and then it always inevitably turns into me expressing my frustrations and stress concerning the climate crisis that we're in in the limited amount of time that we have left to act. He always offers me words of encouragement but last Thursday, I started talking to him about how I feel like if nothing is done and if we continue on the trajectory that our politics is headed I literally, it will be immoral of me to have kids on this planet. And that is something that I've wanted to do all my life like raise a family.
I'm sure you all have families and kids and as many other people say like it's one of the greatest things in life that brings you most fulfillment and that's a privilege that our generation will not be able to have if we continue as we're doing right now. And we've arrived to this fork in the road Where if we continue to ignore the climate crisis by prioritizing profit over people, my generation and those after me may not be able to raise children in a livable world.
Essentially, if corporate interests continue to manipulate the morals of our public politicians you are robbing us of the right to raise families and sustain future generations. So members of the board, you should be doing everything in your power to oppose these greedy forces For the sake of our species and our planet. And at this point, I'd like to invite some other members of my movement to bring up letters they've written to you all as to why we need the Green New Deal and why we need the most drastic measures to be taken to ensure at least a livable future and avoid an apocalypse. And I'd also like to invite anyone else in the room that is with us on this issue and would like to stand with our generation to please stand up. It would mean a lot to us, and I'd like to remind you all that if you choose a path of inaction and corruption and public deception, you are not standing up for our generation and you need to step aside from your position of power.
Thank you all very much.
Our next speaker is Irene Cook to be followed by Pamela Beery.
That's a tough act to follow. Last month our book club read The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells, a very well researched bestselling highly acclaimed book that describes the impacts of climate change in excruciating detail. We all agreed that the Board of Supervisors needed to read this book and be reminded of the urgency of the climate crisis so we are giving each of you a copy.
It's not an easy read. The very well-documented predictions are horrifying, but we hope you will read it and use it to inform the important decisions you'll be making this year. The book is a current and comprehensive treatment of the full extent of the climate emergency, but the sad fact is that the information in the book isn't new. For many decades, scientists have been warning us about the danger of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere. I remember when I was five years old watching documentaries about global warming. For many decades fossil fuel corporations though have led a deliberate effort to prevent any action to address this danger. The county's Energy and Climate Action Plan recognizes these threats. We had this information when the county started working on the plan back in 2009, 10 years ago.
And sadly our greenhouse gas emissions are still increasing not decreasing. Scientists tell us we now have only ten years to take dramatic action to avert the worst consequences of climate change. We don't have another ten years to talk about this. Other jurisdictions have declared a moratorium on new fossil fuel development, but in this county we are wasting precious taxpayer dollars and precious time processing multiple applications for new pipelines, wells and transportation of fossil fuels that experts tell us should stay in the ground.
The thousands of dollars spent on staff time taking these projects through the permitting process should be spent on solutions to decarbonize our atmosphere. I earnestly fear for the future of my young grandson and his generation. If the adults in this decade fail to take drastic action, nothing can protect him from the bleak future described in this book. The beaches he loves are already doomed with sea level rise.
In his short life, he's lived with the terror of wildfire, unbreathable air and deadly mudslides and the worst is yet to come. But solutions are available. We need action on the scale of a World War II mobilization to implement those solutions. We need a Green New Deal for climate action and climate justice. Please start recognizing this climate crisis as the true emergency that threatens all life on Earth.
Please increase the county's commitment to action. Please read the book. We are counting on your leadership to make a difference for the future of our grandchildren, our county and the planet. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Pamela Beery to be followed by John Beery.
Thank you. I'm a Santa Barbara native.
Ma'am, if you could pull the microphone just down a little bit. There you go.
I'm a Santa Barbara native and my husband and I live in the first district. I worked as supervising librarian at Goleta Library. I also worked across the street as a manager at the Santa Barbara Public Library so I feel very comfortable recommending this book to you as essential reading for any decision maker. I want to draw your attention particularly to the chapter entitled Economic Collapse Which discusses the consequences of continuing on our current path of approving new oil projects and giving the green light to even more greenhouse gas emissions going up into the atmosphere. This is a momentous choice which you will have to make.
This is the path that scientists literally label business as usual, and which will take us to four or five degrees centigrade warming by the end of this century. We are now at one degree centigrade warming above pre-industrial levels and are already experiencing disastrous effects from weather related events made far worse because of atmospheric overheating. We've seen the Thomas fire, and the subsequent debris flow. We've seen the Woolsey Fire in Chatworth in Malibu, and the Camp Fire which destroyed the homes of thousands of people living in Paradise California and ruined their city's water infrastructure among other things. And lately, we've seen pictures of unprecedented flooding across the Midwest. Which brings us to economics.
To pick just one of these disasters, the cost of a government contracts after the fire in Paradise, California just for cleanup and disposal of debris alone is $3 billion. In Paradise 14,000 homes were destroyed causing roughly 17 billion in insured losses. And then there's the cost of repairing the city's water infrastructure, and so on. This must be added to the billions and billions from other disasters.
So what does the book Uninhabitable Earth have to say about climate change or economic well-being? Quote, we now know that it will be much, much more expensive to not act on climate than to take even the most aggressive action today, unquote. Studies have shown that by 2030, the world would be about $26 trillion richer If we succeed in rapidly rebuilding the world's energy infrastructure, the longer we delay the more we will suffer economically. A recent scientific paper considers a scenario in which the world meets its current Paris agreements commitments which are not adequate, but limits warming to 2.5 or 3 degrees. Under this scenario economic output drops by 15% to 25%.
If global warming reaches 4 degrees, which it will under business as usual, economic output will drop 30% or more. Compare this to the Great Depression when global GDP dropped by 15%. Ma'am
your time's up I'm sorry.
Okay so take action.
Thank you and just an announcement that we will not be accepting any more public comment slips, so those that are in obviously get to speak but we're closing the acceptance of additional slips.
0:48 – 0:569 turns
Our next speaker is John Beery to be followed by Sharon Broberg
Good morning. As you've noticed, there's a group here from a book club in Santa Barbara and we're all talking about... Sir if you can lift up your microphone so we can hear everything. A little bit more like that? There we go. Thank you. We're all from a small group book club in Santa Barbara sort of a book club conspiracy forced us here. The book is The Uninhabitable Earth and We had to bring it to you because you were the five people who are going to make a decision soon about all these oil wells up in Solomon Hills and all the trucking projects. And it's very important, and it does count.
David Wallace Wells, and it tells the story as others here will tell you about of the various things that could go on and that are already started. It's not pleasant reading, it really isn't. We did consider handing tissues out to you with all of the books. It's not fun to read, but we all managed to get most of the way through it. And when it was released a few months ago, it was hard to get. Bookstores ran out right away.
A friend of mine went to the public library, that was even more recently just a week or two ago. Had wanted to sign up to reserve a copy of this book there were 90 people ahead of her and so people are interested in this it's coming along but we have to be aware that it's important and then its decision makers like you that have to understand what's going on It goes into various things The only one I'm going to various mention myself is a bit about agriculture and the changes in global temperature and what they're going to do to expand the drought, and extend the drought despite this wonderful year we've had so far.
I won't go on beyond that except to tell you that please read the book each of the five copies that have already been given to the clerk have the name of one of the supervisors in a large bookmark This copy is for anyone, it's my personal copy. It's for anyone in the staff particularly energy staff who might benefit from the contents of this so thank you very much.
Our next speaker is Sharon Broberg to be followed by Julian Wise Glass.
Climate change is a wicked problem You as supervisors will not be able to use your rear view mirror to decide, to look at what you've done in the past and to tweak it a bit and plan for the future. Climate change is a wicked problem. That's why I was happy when our small climate book club decided to give you each a copy. We know you'll be making a decision this year on the 750 new oil wells slated for Cat Canyon.
We think this book will help you make an informed decision. I would like to present my personal book to you, Supervisor Williams because I know you've stood with us, the concerned citizenry for many years on environmental and public health issues and I live in your district. Since Carpinteria and Santa Barbara are both coastal cities, I know you all will be interested in the chapter on dying oceans.
I'd like to read a bit from the book. I quote, we tend to see oceans as unfathomable, the closest thing we have on this planet to outer space. The ocean isn't the other, however we are. Water is not a beachside attraction for land animals as 70% of the Earth's surface it is by an enormous margin the planet's predominant environment. At present more than a quarter of the carbon emitted by humans is sucked up by the oceans which also in the past 50 years have absorbed 90% of global warming's excess heat Half of that heat has been absorbed since 1997." End quote.
There's also a chapter on wildfire. I feel I know something about wildfire. Our home burned to the ground with my neighborhood in the T-Fire 10 years ago. With the warming of the planet as the book outlines, the T fire to us which was devastating will be considered an old historic fire. Fires like the Thomas Fire and subsequent deadly mudslide in Montecito will be the new normal.
I thank you for letting us have the time to present you with this book, and I thank you for taking the time to read the book.
Our next speaker is Julian Wise Glass to be followed by Jacob Lesner Buxton.
I didn't hear what you last thing you said?
Our next speaker is Julian.
Okay, good morning. My wife and I have lived on Meadowlark Lane in District 2, near Highway 154 about 7 tenths of a mile from Cathedral Oaks Road since 1978. The first time we evacuated was in the Painted Cave Fire of 1990. Over half the houses on our street were destroyed, mine was not. This was the last fire that affected us for many years. But in the last two years, we have been either evacuated or alerted to evacuate many times.
I have lost track of how many times I've packed up my car. What is hopeful about this situation? There are increasing numbers of people protesting the destruction of the environment and climate change. And young people are playing a leadership role, as in the 70s when many of you were young people. Thank you. That is very encouraging. Scientists are letting us know what is in store for us.
The book that we gave you is only one of many resources detailing the consequences of the use of fossil fuel What is not hopeful is that corporate and political leaders have been very slow to respond to this crisis. Corporations have opposed any regulations that affect profits from seat belts, to not smoking in public places for years and years, and they are still doing it.
Frankly, I find it absolutely absurd that the industry is proposing new oil wells any place on this planet. And that you are even considering their proposals and that we have to come and protest these oil wells. Humanity is committing suicide and you are considering whether to kill ourselves faster or not. I hope you read the book and I hope you will think about the following question What are you going to tell your grandchildren when they ask you, what did you do to stop global warming when you were a supervisor?
Finally, I have led many workshops in Germany on healing from war and genocide. Sometimes people tell me the story of when they got up enough courage to ask their parents or grandparents, what did you do during the war to resist Hitler? When your children asked you And they will if they are still alive. What did you do to stop warming when you were a supervisor?
I hope you will be able to say, I stopped the drilling of 750 oil wells in Santa Barbara County and rest assured they will ask you that question if they are alive. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Jacob Lesner Buxton to be followed by Dan Drennan
0:56 – 1:048 turns
Good morning, my name is Jacob S. Norbergstein and I'm here today representing the Independent Living Resource Center. We are an organization that helps people with disabilities I am the system change advocate. I'm here today to support Indiana's budget, a pay increase for people who provide in-home supportive services. services in the county, and her supportive services help many individuals with disabilities and seniors stay in their home without disabilities.
be in institutions. It costs free time, it costs free time as much to print a person with In her support of service workers in the county, according to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. which is 1650, for a household of one person. Many of these people have children and families Much more than that, Santa Barbara County is also there are 21 other counties that pay in home care workers more than Santa Barbara County.
Thank you for your time.
Our next speaker is Dan Drennan to be followed by Steve Decker. Mr
Chair? Supervisor Adam? I'm not sure how many more people we're going to have and on the climate change issue. And many times when everybody gets done they'll take off. And so I want to challenge your reading club to take a look at a book called Enlightenment Now by Steven Pinker and that may change some of your opinions
Okay, continue with
public comment. Hello my name is Dan Drennan and I live in Carpinteria and I work for someone for in-home care and I'm a carer for her and my wife and it's really hard to I hope we get a raise in home care. It's hard to I get along with everything, what's going on and thank you for coming up. Thanks for being here today.
Our next speaker is Steve Decker to be followed by Brigitte Van Der Rey and she is our final speaker.
Chairman Lavinino and members of the board, good morning. I am Steve Decker, CEO of Santa Barbara Cannabis, a company dedicated to increasing medical benefits of cannabis. Much prejudice against cannabis remains in our society today. Folks are still regurgitating the 80 year old politically motivated propaganda. That was used to try to stamp out the cannabis plant altogether from our culture.
With the factual knowledge that the plant has served many beneficial medical and industrial uses over thousands of years, attempts to remove it from our culture has been a travesty. California approved the medical use of cannabis nearly a quarter century ago. It was the first in the nation to do so and now there are 33 states all together with more to come for good reason. Canada, having fully legalized cannabis use for any purpose reported that fully two-thirds of its sale of cannabis in the past year was for medical purposes. That is a profound statistic that debunks the notion that cannabis as an intoxicant like alcohol beverages is it's only purpose to exist.
Briefly, the preeminent online information resource about cannabis provides a detailed analysis of the thousands of cannabis strains that have been developed over the years through selective breeding. For each known strain, the website gives you an in-depth analysis of the strain's effects both positive and negative as well as its various medical effects. The growing scientific knowledge base of the medicinal value of cannabis is growing by leaps and bounds.
Israel is the epicenter of medical cannabis research in the world today. It currently boasts 150 research projects and 26 clinical trials underway. The United States is trying to catch up with UCLA, Harvard, and MIT pursuing research on all aspects of the cannabis plant. The list of human ailments that various cannabis compounds can ameliorate or even possibly cure, like certain cancers is growing every year.
Supervisor Williams' thoughtful response to a previously published anti-cannabis propaganda screed is exactly what is needed to allow cannabis in our county to take its rightful place in the full on reemergence of it as the most valuable and productive plant ever known to humanity. Santa Barbara County's cannabis cultivation industry, along with the world class scientific research capability of UCSB should be encouraged not discouraged. Our company, Santa Barbara Cannabis is striving to become a renowned mark of excellence in medical cannabis. Helping to bring another respected worldwide reputation to our county along with its scenic beauty, fine wines, superior agricultural crops and highly respected education and research institutions. Let's move forward, not backwards out of misinformation prejudice and ignorance in an effort to help disseminate greater factual knowledge about medicinal uses of cannabis.
I've created this short informational booklet I wish to share with you today. I hope it is helpful.
And our final speaker is Brigitte Van Der Ray.
1:04 – 1:106 turns
Hello, my name is Brigitte Vandere and I agree with all the people that I've heard previously. I think they made excellent points and I hope you take them very seriously. I also wanted to say that I'm very proud of this county, all the progress that has been made in the past A leader we are to the entire country with our environmentalism and some of the progress that we have made in the last few years. And I'm just besides myself with pride, I want to encourage you to continue with that and to even increase your efforts in every way possible.
I worked all my career as a resource manager, the Forest Service. And after retiring, I started reading more. I start seeing articles about food. Energy, I start seeing articles about health, asthma, different things that are changing in our world. And one by one, I'm starting to connect the dots. They're all related to one thing, our impact on the Earth. And it is a sad thing when we start to realize that something needs to change and we don't want to change. And I understand, there's money involved, there's habits, there's things that we've known and loved all our lives. But on the other hand, we all have children.
And just recently got a grandchild and I'm starting to think uh-oh, we do need to do something. I just want to say that three of the main things that seem to be problematic is our use of fossil fuels. You probably know as well as I do all the impacts of that, our use of plastics is becoming an increasing concern and our use of water is becoming an increasing concern.
As projects and decisions come up before you, I ask that you would keep these things in mind and do everything that you can. These are not political issues, they're not business decisions, it's a survival decision. I'm looking at things like how global warming is affecting our children's health. Asthma and allergies are off the charts compared to what they used to be.
We're looking at pests and diseases that used to be in the southern hemisphere coming north. They're coming north because they can make it here now, they didn't use to be able to make it here, they didn't survive, now they do. This is affecting our agricultural business, this is affecting our healthcare, this is affecting our kids lives. People who get these diseases, they're not always able to cure them.
We're also looking at weather patterns that have changed. Weather patterns, we look at the news every single night and we see this thing about tornadoes and stuff being here longer than they used to be. When I was a kid, a tornado lasted for a day, now it lasts for five. The damage is off the charts. Your time's up
ma'am.
Okay well, I appreciate you hearing me thank you.
Thank you supervisor Hartman.
Thank you Mr. Chair and normally we don't comment on public comment but I would like to say a few things the first is that we can't act today, we would have to do something in the future and we can't act on specific projects we have to serve as judges and each has to be considered in its own In its own right, however I would like to bring forward a resolution on June 4th that supports the Green New Deal. I was a student in Germany in the 70s.
I was with students whose parents had been the Nazis and grandparents had been Nazis and saw how difficult that was for them. I also worked in a kibbutz, part of the first group of German students to go and work in a kibbutz in Israel, the Petit Kibbutz, and saw how tormented the students were trying to go back and make up for what their parents and grandparents had done.
I wanted to read a poem today By Drew Dellinger. It's 323 in the morning and I'm awake because my children and grandchildren won't let me sleep. They ask me in dreams, what did you do while the planet was plundered? What did you do when the earth was unraveling? Surely you did something when the seasons started failing as the mammals reptiles birds were all dying Did you fill the streets with protest when democracy was stolen?
What did you do once you knew? Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Supervisor Williams.
1:10 – 1:202 turns
I was very moved by the comments said today. I remember that acute Pain in your heart that comes with the burning when you know something is wrong in the world. And I encourage you to use that fire of the heart, that burns in you as it does in me, as fuel for action both in terms of political advocacy but also something much harder because We in California have been very, very successful in political advocacy. Our emissions that are government controlled have dramatically been cut but our emissions that is consumer controlled is out of control.
Our emissions continue to rise from vehicle miles traveled in this county and statewide so if you just look at stuff Like energy stuff that we have the government has a tighter control on. We would be a shining example of progress in the state of California, but we're not a shining example of progress because so much of the gains that we've made in political work have been obviated or negated by consumer demand to drive more.
Now, so I guess I would very much propose a covenant that you do all you can to change that culture That economic demand, and I will do all I can to ensure that we're not approving things that increase emissions. And in fact taking actions that reduce emissions. It's great to see so many new faces here too with the exception of Ms. Broberg, I don't see many of you at public comment. So that's really good.
That's exciting to me. When you're in politics, you see the usual suspects so much when you see new faces. Both the young and the experienced. It is inspirational to me but we, the county takes permits it's not their fault it was the decision of the voters. Some of you and I campaigned for a measure called Measure P that would have banned Enhanced oil extraction techniques if that had passed Several of the projects would not have been eligible to to submit but the voters chose To turn that down So that is why it's not County staffs fault That is why they have to study it. That's why they have to bring it to us and eventually bring it to us as as judges You know that I think there is real danger in the world because of this, but there is also the possibility of solutions.
I mean, I think a lot of people remember in the late 80's and early 90's the discussions of ozone depletion and that was created by a variety of chemical substances used and an international treaty called the Montreal Protocol basically phased out those substances And though there is a small hole that remains in the ozone layer, nobody is talking this day and age about radiation destroying large swathes of life on Earth. And that's because international agreements were respected. That is because industry changed. It's because people stopped buying them and a solution was made.
There are a number of issues out there Paris climate agreement- this board is taken. A position in support of that- and- I do believe that we should take a position in support of the Green New Deal- or at least discuss it and so I will join- with the supervisor Hartman I in looking at some of these things and I'll look at them deeper. They look like a lot of things that the county's already up to, right?
Smart grids building codes 100% renewable energy soil health changes in transportation. We may be up to these things, but we need to do a lot more. And if the international agreements are to work, we in the United States need to have a plan of how to comply with them and so I think it's a good idea that we talk about that the first week in June and have a resolution to discuss the Green New Deal.
Supervisor Adam? Couple things. First of all, I think that it's deeply disturbing to me and I know many others when we compare people who disagree with us on climate change and some of the issues that are around it to Nazis. It's really disappointing to me that that's where we're just starting off here on this discussion. We didn't even need to let it devolve, and I think we really ought to rethink that because that's going to lead us to some very dark places, and I don't want to go there.
Well, I disagree. And you know with all due respect you guys might want to consider you youngsters not you seasoned people because we know that you know everything because we can ask you but you youngsters may consider the possibility that you don't know everything You know, this isn't a back and forth. Yeah it's my turn now. I sat there and listened to you. Okay doesn't matter. And I couldn't disagree more and I couldn't be more saddened.
I mean I find your...and I understand youthful exuberance and that's it's a good thing But the world has never been a safer place. There has never been, well you can shake your head if you want to but I'm telling you lifespans are longer people are healthier worldwide there has never been a time on this planet that was better time to be a human. If you don't feel that way that's okay.
You know I don't wanna make you feel that way But you know I have a grandkid coming right now too. And I look forward to their arrival and I don't even know what to tell you guys. I mean, we're so far off on You know my position On this and in your position it's almost this thing where we're just gonna have to disagree or agree to disagree and just have a 4-1 or a 3-2 vote. I'm not sure how that would go but Just move on. I mean God just just This is going to be something that's just, I'm not looking forward to this at all. And by the way, I am not running for office again so nobody is contributing to my campaign and yeah really thank you very much ma'am.
You know, I think we've lost sight of the economics and you got one of the young men in the audience here has a shirt that says we have a right to good jobs and livable future. And that's exactly what I want for you. I want that for you more than anything. And I think petroleum has a place in that. An energy source that enables human health and eliminates tremendous amounts of toil.
And that's done disproportionately by people of color, and so I would think some In favor of that, so I don't know. I'm just I'm kind of Deeply saddened by this whole discussion and I hope that we can maintain a level of civility as we go through this That's appropriate supervisor Hartman
1:20 – 1:244 turns
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wanted to correct the record. The analogy is an analogy. There is a huge looming threat. We can be in denial and we can move quickly from denial to despair. We have a narrow window in which to act And I've been doing a little reading to the January 2019 effects of a changing climate to the Department of Defense and looking at all their facilities and how those have to be protected given the impacts of climate change. Or the 2019 worldwide threat assessment of the US intelligence community that says climate change is a threat multiplier. It multiplies existing threats like health security, nuclear proliferation, terrorism, mass displacements of people and we all know what huge migration issues what that does so The facts are clear what we're going to do about it remains to be decided
Okay Well, I appreciate anytime people come and want to be part of the process. Regardless if I agree with you or don't agree with you, I think that's what makes this country a great country. And I do appreciate the fact that everybody maintained decorum even though we disagree on something that is very, it can lead to a lot of emotion. In fact, I think that's what a lot of this is, You know, fear is probably the biggest motivator of all for people. And so when you get scared, you want to act. I agree with Supervisor Williams' challenge that a lot of people like to talk about it and a lot of people like to protest about it and march about it. But usually they're driving their own car down to the protest. And so it's not convenient to do a lot of things that I hear about And I feel a lot of people talking about it, and I don't see a lot of people changing their habits.
So it's going to be inconvenient and it's going to be tough to do a lot of the things that people are talking about. And so we can talk about the product which is oil but at the same time We all really like to use it. So I think everybody kind of needs to do what we used to do in high school at Our Lady, the Most Blessed Sacrament and Seminary which was do an examination of conscience.
And figure out at the end of the day whether we're all doing the right thing. So Supervisor Williams?
Civility is really needed in this conversation only because if we are to fundamentally change our culture and our economy, we're going to have to change a lot of hearts. And you need civility to change hearts. And I want to say even though I think we disagree on oil most of the time, Supervisor Lavinino and Supervisor Adam, I don't find them, believe me, Because I served in the legislature, I did find people who I thought their values or their priorities were fundamentally changed by their campaign contributions. I can think in my mind of a couple examples.
These guys, I don't think their values are changed by their campaign contributions. Steve, Mr. Labanino is judicious about every matter and Mr. Adam may be with oil all the time but it's not because of his campaign contributions it's just because of his beliefs so you know I think since we're going to have a big knockout drag out fight on June 4th or whatever the first Tuesday let's try to keep it civil because remember we need to change a lot of hearts
Okay, with that we will close public comment. Appreciate those comments and appreciate everybody being here. We will take a ten minute break and start the departmental agenda at 1030.
1:26 – 1:333 turns
Hello. Good morning.
Hello.
Music Music The . . . . Hello. Hello. You. Thank you.
1:33 – 1:3613 turns
Okay, I'd like to reconvene this meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk can you read in departmental agenda item number one please?
Chair Lavagnino and members of the board, departmental item number one is from probation. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding extra help services and a retirement waiver for the Probation Department.
Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I'm here today to ask permission to bring a soon-to-be retiree back before waiting the six months and while Miss Anderson is an integral member of our management team and responsible for all of our support services vehicles equipment and number of other items in Debbie fashion she has provided me with a list with all of her duties and who should take responsibility for those things The other key The duty that Debbie performs is she is one of the either lead or a key project member on just about every capital project that our department has undertaken in the last 20 years.
And it is in that capacity that I need to have her available as we close out Okay, very good. Are there any questions of the board members?
Is there any public comment on this matter.
Chair Levin, you know members of the board we have no request to speak.
Supervisor Hart? I move the staff recommendation. Second.
Moved and seconded all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Okay. Kind of looking at timeline and agenda management. So we are going to break it noon. Pretty long closed session. Mr. Gazzone, what are you anticipating for a closed session?
Chair we have two litigation items that total probably about 30 minutes and then we have ten public employee performance evaluations and I'll ask CEO to comment on her estimate for that. Five
minutes, no just kidding.
Chair about 30 minutes.
Okay so we're looking at least an hour, hour and a half for our break. Okay, so I'm not sure if we're going to get to EMS before or after lunch. It looks like it will probably be after lunch or maybe have the presentation and then it's gonna get to the afternoon. So can't tell you right now whether or not to stay or not stay but I think we're definitely gonna break before EMS but I'll know in the next half hour.
Mr. Chair, I'm gonna have to run at four.
You're running at four? Okay, I think we're gonna be fine by then. Item number two.
1:36 – 1:483 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, departmental item number two is from probation. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding fiscal year 2019 through 2020 public safety realignment act plan.
Good afternoon chair Lavinino and supervisors I'm Tanya Heitman chief probation officer we come before you today to present Santa Barbara County's fiscal year 1920 realignment implementation plan this represents our ninth plan since realignment commenced in October 2011 Deputy Chief Probation Officer Kim Sheehan will present an overview of the plan and Administrative Deputy Director Damon Fletcher will cover the fiscal overview. But before I turn it over to them, I want to highlight what I consider the most noteworthy aspects of this latest plan.
Throughout the presentation you will hear of the local criminal justice partners' efforts to continue sound practices that support the realigned population. And while these efforts are important and we want to ensure they continue, I want to acknowledge the work that's focused beyond the realigned population that support improved outcomes for offenders throughout our local criminal justice system.
There are three key areas that we have strived to impact since realignment commenced And I'm pleased to be able to see substantial progress now taking place. The first is treatment options in county jail. We've taken steps toward increased treatment options each year and are doing so again in this plan. In partnership with the sheriff, we obtained a transition from jail to community grant in December of 2012.
That project concluded several years ago but the change it prompted continues and the foundational concepts of risk assessments Targeted in custody treatment programs and reentry planning remain in place and have gradually expanded. Not only through realignment funding efforts, but through ongoing commitment from the sheriff and local agencies that continue to partner with the jail.
In this plan we're expanding our re-entry efforts and establishing a base for treatment options for the Northern Branch Jail as well. Second pretrial assessments and supervision it took longer than many of us would have liked But through perseverance, key partnerships, technical assistance efforts and collaboration we now use a validated risk assessment tool to assist judicial officers in making pre-trial release decisions.
We have robust release options ranging from release on one's own recognizance to intensive supervised release with electronic monitoring capability. And we've established opportunities for this program to continue to grow and ensure Santa Barbara County is responsive to the latest research and best practices in the pretrial arena. And then third, supportive housing for the criminal justice population.
This is a key initiative that at times felt like it would never come to pass. It is now not only moving forward but it's doing so with strong support And infrastructure, which will ensure its success. I came before you many times over the years and ensured some of you as well as board members before you that we would continue to seek to address housing issues in the criminal justice population. I'm so relieved to be able to say it is now not just a hope and a dream but it's coming to fruition.
Although our effort may seem small in relation to the need, it is evidence of our commitment and willingness to work together to address this important issue. As chair of the Community Corrections Partnership I want to acknowledge the membership of the CCP and its executive committee as well as the work group members who monitor the work throughout the year as well as put the plan together and to thank your board for supporting changes and collaboration that has fostered these improvements.
And with that, I'll turn it over to Kim Sheehan the work group chair for the presentation.
Thank you chief and good morning Chair Lavagnino and supervisors. The fiscal year 1920 realignment plan was approved by the Community Corrections Partnership and its executive committee on April 19th. And as required by statute, the recommended programs are to be consistent with local needs and resources. Leveraging our strong foundation of collaboration between county departments, community-based organizations and other stakeholders. And on behalf of the CCP we bring forward today a comprehensive plan and associated budget that represents a balanced systemic approach to our shared interest in enhancing public safety Realignment introduced two new populations under the supervision and responsibility of the county.
The first is the post-release community supervision offender, known as PRCS that was previously supervised by state parole and now under county supervision. And our second population known locally as Post Sentence Supervision or PSS Prior to realignment, these individuals served felony sentences in state prison and are now serving those sentences in our jail followed by supervision by probation.
The demographics of our realigned population have stayed fairly steady. 68% of our population falls within the age span of 25-44. 59% of realigned individuals are Hispanic and 31% White. The PSS population tends to have a higher percentage of females. Here are the realignment population trends from 2013. Following the passing of Prop 47 in 2014, the composition of the two classifications saw some change with the PSS population experiencing a gradual decline as many of the types of crimes that would have resulted in a felony sentence had been reclassified to misdemeanors.
In the past 18 months we have seen a slight increase in both populations. The increase in PRCS is attributed to legislative changes in 2016 adjusting how custody credits were calculated for certain classifications of individuals in state prison, allowing opportunities for early release into community supervision. We are anticipating that absent any additional legislative changes This number should stabilize.
This was not driven by an increase in the number of individuals sent to prison, but by a concentrated release of individuals already incarcerated when the legislative changes occurred. As of May 15th we have 304 PRCS and 167 PSS individuals under community supervision. Highlighted are a few of our accomplishments beginning with our quality assurance committee which was established as a working group to reduce recidivism through the utilization and implementation of research based interventions.
The group is comprised of representatives from the probation department sheriff's office Department of Behavioral Wellness and community-based organizations. The goals of the committee are to assess and ensure fidelity with the use of evidence based models, to support skill building by creating opportunities for joint training and development, to identify gaps in service, and to promote improved outcomes through collaborative quality assurance efforts.
Throughout this past year, bimonthly lunch and learn sessions were held with community-based service provider partners throughout the county to introduce various evidence based principles and strategies. And to discuss topics of interest and shared experience and ideas for improvement. The pretrial supervised release program as the chief mentioned was implemented in July 2017 adding a community supervision component to the existing pretrial program.
Currently, staff assigned to the Superior Courts Pretrial Unit administer an evidence-based risk assessment tool to assess each defendant's risk of reoffense while pending court and the probability of appearances at future court hearings. A recommendation submitted to the court in defendants who are denied release on their own recognizance can be recommended for supervised release.
Those released are then monitored in the community by probation officers known as pretrial compliance officers based on the type of crime charged and their risk level. In this past fiscal year, a fourth officer was added to the team due to the increased population. On July 1st of last year there were 70 individuals being monitored and as of May 15th there are 124 pretrial individuals in the community.
Over 356 individuals have been supervised while on this pretrial status this fiscal year, with only 24 offenders having missed a court date. The vast majority or approximately 94% are continuing to appear in court while out on pre-trial supervision. On December 11, 2018 following a recommendation from the CCP your board approved an allocation of $2.45 million in reserve funding for supportive and transitional housing for medium and high risk to recidivate justice involved individuals.
These clients present with vulnerabilities in areas of mental and physical health, and or significant substance dependency. This target population exiting jail or prison often do not have natural supports and are ineligible for other types of subsidized housing. And often do not qualify for housing options through the Department of Behavioral Wellness. This population will likely be unserved by other housing resources because of ineligibility due to length of incarceration and conviction history.
These funding allocations address both short-term and long-term housing access. 800,000 was approved for a two year pilot program for supportive housing and 1.5 million of one time reserve funds was approved for the development or rehabilitation of a brick and mortar permanent housing for high to medium risk justice involved individuals under supervision by probation.
The two year pilot for supportive housing consists of 12 beds in Santa Barbara, in partnership with Salvation Army. And 16 beds in Santa Maria with Good Samaritan Housing and was launched three weeks ago. As of this morning we have a one person placed on the bed and we have five people in jail that are finishing their sentences for placement in a supportive housing bed.
For the brick and mortar permanent housing development portion of the project, the probation department in collaboration with Housing and Community Development evaluated responses to the NOFA. And we'll be presenting to the CCP in August a proposal for approval prior to returning to this board for final approval. The first four goals outlined on this slide were established by the CCP at the inception of realignment and have provided a sound foundation guiding the development of objectives and related outcomes.
This year, a new fifth goal of increasing racial and ethnic equity among justice-involved individuals has been incorporated to support systemic approach to studying and addressing disparities in the justice system.
1:48 – 1:563 turns
Yes. While you pause there, just a second. So to AMR and to our chiefs, we're not going to hear EMS before the earliest we would be getting back is one o'clock. Okay? So it won't be heard before 1. So if you can pass that message to your other chiefs too, that'd be great. Okay Kim, thank you.
While 14 objectives are put forward in our plan for the coming fiscal year, we have highlighted four for the presentation today. The first to increase the percentage of the realigned population without a felony conviction during the term of probation. In fiscal year 17-18, 29% of the realigned population that exited committed a felony during the term of probation supervision. This was an increase of 8 percentage points from the previous year.
Specifically in 16-17, of the 215 individuals that exited probation supervision 46 committed a felony. Compared to 59 out of the 203 exits in 17-18. This objective was selected as we saw this uptick in recidivism and have already begun a deeper dive through data mining efforts to better understand these individuals who recidivated, and to identify commonalities and inform opportunities for improved interventions. These efforts and analysis will be used to drive changes to reduce recidivism.
While we further examine and evaluate this recidivism data, we would also like to highlight that a 29% recidivism rate for high-risk offenders is a much improved rate than the pre-realignment era of 60% of offenders returning to prison within the first three years of release. The next objective we are highlighting are the continued efforts to reduce the percentage of the total inmate population that are low risk to recidivate.
And as of January 31st, 7% of the total jail population were assessed in this category. This was a successful decrease from 12%, from ten months earlier which was achieved in part due to the expansion of pretrial release. The third objective is aligned with our newest goal of increasing racial and ethnic equity among justice-involved individuals. This is a substantial undertaking, and the first year will entail a preliminary training and data collection effort.
A subcommittee of the CCP work group has been formed with members of Justice Partner agencies and other stakeholders. With the first meeting occurring later this week, and in fact it's tomorrow. Two specific objectives for this first year include inventorying existing efforts and providing implicit bias training. And mining data on race and ethnicity of justice involved individuals to understand local trends and opportunities for improvement.
Additionally, through the use of our training funds and leveraging future training opportunities, an objective on increasing evidence-based training for county and service provider staff will be a focus in the coming year. As you can see we have multiple plan revisions. Following a multi-year review process and guidance from strategic planning efforts provided by the JFA Institute, resources from the Alternative Sentencing Bureau were reallocated to the Sheriff's Treatment Program. This includes two correctional counselors, curriculum and support services for the North Branch Jail.
Additionally, the Sheriff's Jail in Dovo tablet program will be funded for an additional year through the use of reserve funds. The Public Defender's Office was funded to establish a client services specialist and two transporters. This client services specialist position will locate and coordinate treatment services in the community for in-and-out of custody clients. While pre-release planning is a focus, this position will also support an advocate for the client in the community on a day-to-day basis and to alleviate barriers and assist with connecting the client. The district attorney's office.
Was provided funding to increase the victim witness advocate position from a .5 FTE to full-time position for the next fiscal year. The DA's Victim Witness Assistance Program provides early intervention to victims of crime at the arraignment and pre filing stages. To expedite services and mitigate victims' crises, this position will allow the DA's office to provide enhanced strategies to serve victims at their earliest moments following a crime.
Including access to services and criminal protective orders assistance.
The fiscal year 19-20 funding target used in developing the plan is $14 million. This consists of $13.1 million in current year base allocation, $684,000 of fiscal year 17-18 growth which we received in October and $204,000 of estimated drawdown from the restricted fund balance. The fiscal year 19-20 allocation won't be known until September or October however based on past experience the allocation should exceed the 13.1 million we've included in the plan which will significantly reduce the use of one time funding.
The 19-20 plan continues the balanced approach, addressing custody and alternatives to custody. Supervision in case management and treatment. The supervised pretrial release program is showing the custody and alternatives to custody grouping as this is another strategy to reduce the custody population of the jail. It is estimated that there will be $3.5 million of available unspent restricted fund balance on June 30th of this year. The plan includes the use of some of these funds, which is detailed in the next slide.
In addition it's anticipated that there will be $784,000 of unspent planning and training funds. The restricted fund balance will be approximately $13.4 million at the end of the fiscal year. There's 4.4 million allocated to projects in fiscal year 17-18, primarily for capital projects related to the Mental Health Rehabilitation Center and the Probation Report and Resource Center which remain unspent.
It is anticipated that 1.5 million for the PRRC will be used in the new probation building that will co-locate and expand that program. In addition, the 18-19 plan includes one time allocations that remain unspent. Including $227,000 for the second year of Prop 47 work that impacts a public defender court and district attorney's office. $22,000 remains for work on the master name index project of the criminal justice data committee.
1.65 million was set aside for brick and mortar facility as well as to fund a housing specialist at HCD. $800,000 remains for the two-year supportive housing pilot project that Deputy Chief Shin was just speaking about. 529,000 has been set aside as match for the pretrial felony mental health diversion program grant which is a collaboration between the Department of Behavioral Wellness and the Sheriff's Department.
$1.2 million consisting of 894,000 of fiscal year 16-17 growth and 320,000 in restricted fund balance was included to balance the current year's plan. At the end of the current fiscal year any unspent funds allocated to the second year Prop 47 that criminal justice data committee data needs or to balance the budget will be released and increase the amount of available restricted fund balance.
The fiscal year 1920 plan before you today recommends the allocation of $442,000 to one-time needs. This includes allocations for what is anticipated to be the third and final year of the Prop 47 data mining project impacting the public defender courts and district attorney. A one year extension for 180 in Dovo tablets in the Santa Barbara jail, and $40,000 to continue the progress being made with the Criminal Justice Data Committee.
As has been the case for several years, $1 million has been set aside as a prudent reserve. The remaining unallocated restricted balance is $3.16 million.
1:56 – 2:0926 turns
The CCP has remained committed to a data-driven approach to managing and allocating resources through evidence based strategies that maintain public safety while holding offenders accountable. The strong collaborative foundation of the local realignment efforts has provided both a structure and a flexibility that has allowed for expansions and program enhancements in the coming year, including reentry support, jail programming, supportive housing, and victim services.
Investment in our community and in our commitment to reducing recidivism continue to be holistic in approach, and are made with an understanding that the needs of the justice-involved population are vast, diverse, and unique. I'd like to thank all of the departments for their contributions, and our internal plan development team at probation for their engagement, creativity, and commitment."
The quote here is stated by Charles Darwin It is the long history of humankind that those who learn to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed. Thank you, and we can answer any questions you may have.
Thank you. Questions of the board? Supervisor Williams.
A couple questions. One is one of the interests that is here today is on the permanent supportive housing part of the priorities of the strategies And beyond the funding that we have for Good Samaritan and for Salvation Army, the project that reserves are being set aside for. Is that enough reserves to build a project? When do we see that we might be able to build a project?
I kind of want to see what's the plan and are we on track for the plan?
We have reviewed a proposal with HCD and presented an initial proposal at the CCP workgroup last month. And we'll be going to the CCP in August with that, and that is for the 1.5 allocation for what we've titled it the brick-and-mortar portion of the allocation.
And even after spending these reserves that were That's correct. Got it. And then a second question I have is people want to follow along page 16 of the plan, which is our detention alternatives. You guys or the Sheriff's Department, or Mr. Malachian know how much general funds are we pairing with that funding? Or is this a comprehensive figure of what we're spending on detention alternatives?
Chair Supervisor through the chair. I'm not sure of what the total amount is, but I believe that supervisor Williams is referring to the combination of alternative sentencing and pretrial release There is additional funding That goes to the court for pretrial that we anticipate shifting to probation in January. But the Sheriff's Department also has additional funding that's going to the Alternative Sentencing Bureau.
I don't believe there's been any change in that funding historically. It was funded and then realignment came alongside an added to it we've decreased the amount of money. That realignments placing on alternative sentencing although there continues to be some but I don't believe there's been a read reduction in the general fund.
Yeah I just you know this page 16 is that at 558 thousand is that what the sheriff's department is spending on alternative sentencing or is there a general fund portion in addition to that Apart from probation's program, I just want to kind of get my head around
this. Supervisor Williams, I don't have that information off the top of my head. I do know that the chief is correct that there has not been a reduction in the alternative sentencing bureau but I'll have to get back to you on what the dollar amount is.
As I talked a little bit about it at the budget hearing my concern is that if you look at this graph. It appears that we are not increasing the amount of people on alternative sense sentencing which you know since our population in the jail is is a cost driver as long as we keep on shoveling money and there were not going to have as much money for preventative work It's alarming to me that you know at the end of the period December 18. Yeah, the same number of people that we had at This has been talked about as part of our adaptation strategy.
So I'm trying to understand when are we going to see some benefits from the amount of money that we're putting towards this? And if you have an answer or if you want to get me an answer, but I sure would like to know where the light at the end of the tunnel is.
Supervisor Williams to the chair that the jail population over the last two years has declined. The average daily population has declined probably in the neighborhood of about 10%. The issue, and I haven't looked at it recently but I will, but the number of people on alternative sensing and electronic monitoring has not gone up you're correct about that The general reasoning for that is the nature of the population. Prop 47 and some of the other criminal justice reform acts have taken a majority of the people who might have been eligible for electronic monitoring and moved them out.
Part of the criminal justice mapping project that the CEO's office has tasked Staff with performing and coming back to this board early next year is going to focus on that as well Why who's on electronic monitoring, and how can we get more people on there? So I guess the question that I'd love to
have is is Is it is at the sheriff's department Sheriff's position that we've run out of people who are good candidates for electronic monitoring Or that there's still some people there, we just need to figure out who and have a good supervision for those individuals.
Supervisor Williams, I know that the Sheriff's Office before and since last September has made a huge effort to try to increase the number of people in electronic monitoring. But it would be probably not appropriate for me to try to speak for the sheriff today but I will get that information.
Sure, I understand that. I think either is a possible legitimate position that you could offer evidence for. I just want to know which one it is. Have we run out of people that are safe to electronic monitor, or is there just more further work to be done? And what would be great from the department is just a little bit of detail why either one of those positions is correct.
Supervisor Williams, we will get that information for you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. I just had one question, so we've kind of been through this for six or seven years now. I'm curious as how to other, I'm sure you're part of some associations statewide. What's the feeling? One of the things that you had said is absent any legislative changes, this is how we're going and we do have a new governor. I am curious if your organizations feel that there are some significant changes that are going to happen in realignment or that this is the new normal. What's kind of the feeling statewide?
Chair, I was just at the Chief Probation Officers Association meetings last week. There aren't any real significant changes that are being discussed at this point in terms of realignment. There are other initiatives... Hold
on a second. We can't make new plastics we just heard about that. Okay, I'm sorry about that chief.
There are other initiatives that are focusing on the general probation population in comparison to the realigned population. By that I mean, the realigned population has very distinct methodology for revocations that cap how much time they can spend in custody on a revocation. The general probation population does not have the same limitations on it so what we see is Offenders that are on standard probation serving much longer periods of time in custody for a technical violation than a realigned offender that came out of prison, which doesn't seem right. It doesn't seem appropriate. So there are some proposed changes being looked at the state level to modify some of what we do with standard probationers To model some of the best practices that we use within the revocation population.
The length of time that probationers are subject to supervision, much longer for a standard probationer and in Santa Barbara County in particular, we often times use what's called a five year grant of probation. Many jurisdictions have moved to using primarily three year grants of probation So there may be some legislation that addresses some of those disparities across the state.
Then the other area of a lot of interest right now is really on the juvenile side of things, much focus on the juvenile side. So I think we may get a little bit of a respite to continue implementing realignment and the changes that that brought along while the focus is on the standard probationers and the juvenile end for a little while.
So maybe some minor tweaks but nothing, no major change of course you don't see.
Although we've seen surprises before so I can't rule those out entirely. There is also as you know a big emphasis on pre-trial and bail reform and regardless of what happens with SB 10 I believe that will continue to see that movement.
Okay, Supervisor Hart. Yeah I just appreciate Chief Heitman's presentation with Deputy Sheehan's extra remarks and share Supervisor Williams' concerns about the numbers in the population in the jail and want to work toward reducing that but That the public safety realignment plan supports that work really well, and there's a lot of progress being made. And it's not evident necessarily in that population but in the recidivism rates going down is a huge important thing to speak to and recognize. And all the additional treatment that's available, the extra work for supportive housing, all these pieces fit together. The addition of the goal Systematically approach racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal justice system. Another piece of this work that's really important too, looking forward to that moving forward in the next year.
So there is a lot to be really excited about and proud about and obviously a lot more work to do but this is a great report and important moment so thank you.
Very good, so request to speak from the public, Madam Clerk?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board we have 12 requests to speak today on this item. And we are going to start with Robert Ornstein to be followed by Earls. Is Robert available?
I don't see Bob.
Okay. We're going to Earls to be followed by Martha Santrisos
2:09 – 2:159 turns
Robert Ornstein had to leave, he's been here since the beginning. So good morning I'm Maureen Earles, the chair of the Clues Criminal Justice Committee. Faith communities are standing with those vulnerable cycling through our jail and seeks to help empower them to transition successfully back into our communities. The realignment plan goal is the same, to reduce recidivism by implementing good programs.
We're excited for the new step forward toward achieving this common goal. We fully support the two permanent supported housing projects in the realignment plan. We acknowledge Chief Kimberly Sean and Kimberly Albers for hearing our advocacy And together developing these new quality housing projects and getting their CCP approval in one year. We're also very concerned the realignment plan we were given that I read before you now, I assume it's the same one continues to fund many good programs yet our common goal is not being met according to the latest realignment data on page 30 of the copy we had. It shows an increase in new realignment convictions three years post-release from jail and probation, in 2016 as compared to 2015. And that's the latest information we have.
Actually there was a 19% increase in new convictions of those in the jail and probation group called PSS. We need to ask as a community why our realignment plan is not working to decrease recidivism each year and what will work. Permanent supportive housing can be accountable for the measurable outcome of reducing recidivism, that is why we support the transition and rapid rehousing project which then becomes permanent housing To be moved from a two-year pilot funded with reserves to be moved to the ongoing budget line item of $400,000 per year. And that would make this a stable program with long term outcomes. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Martha Santrisos to be followed by Sharon Broberg
Can we briefly just clarify that because looking at page 29 and 30 of the copy that I have, it looks like that violations among the two, the PRCS and PSS have decreased. And so recidivism is decreasing and it's also less than it was This is not what it was predicted to be.
Supervisor through the chair, that is correct. We're looking at two different measures here. One is the one I believe she was referencing was conviction within three years after release from custody or placement on supervision and the data I was sharing with you in the presentation was felony convictions while under supervision.
So meaning if you're looking A conviction or supervision, the numbers are on the rise. But if you look at just convictions, the number is going down of recidivism, meaning we're supervising more but less people are ending up back in jail? Is that essentially the
conclusion? I think that's... Yeah, that is fair supervisor.
Okay.
Good morning. Santa Barbara County Supervisors, I'm Deacon Martha Santrizos. I'm a member of Trinity Lutheran Church in Santa Barbara and also on the CLU Board of Santa Barbara. I am here this morning to advocate my support for the Housing Subcommittee Realignment Plan. It was almost a year ago when many were here in this same room asking for funds to start up a housing project I'm thankful to see how this project has moved forward over the last year and the support that it has received from the Board of Supervisors and the community.
We're hoping this project is not just a one-time project, but the new beginning of seeking ways to help turn around the high rate of recidivism in the County of Santa Barbara. There's proof that supportive housing works for the most vulnerable populations. There is evidence that supportive housing results in reduced recidivism. Let's continue to fund more housing and find other ways too, to reduce that recidivism rate in our jails and in the community.
Thank you for your support.
Our next speaker is Sharon Broberg to be followed by Jane Freirembacher.
2:15 – 2:2717 turns
Hello. I'm a member of CLU.
Ma'am, can you pull your microphone up just a tad? Thank you very much.
Hi. It's Sharon again. I am a member of CLU and a couple of Buddhist organizations in Santa Barbara. A board member of CLU asked me to talk about my experience of writing to prison inmates. I do this correspondence with Circle of Love Inside Service Project I've written to Jim in California for nine years and James in Illinois for six years, and each letter I learn more about their dismal prison experience. Of course it's not supposed to be fun but It's not really working out to get them back in the community.
I also received letters from other inmates hoping to be matched with pen pals, all men and all forgotten and rejected by their families. I recognize the suffering of those in jail and prison, and the difficulty they have in reentering society when their family support system has dried up. I support the realignment funds that are being used for the kind of housing projects outlined in the 2019 plan.
I believe it will help reduce recidivism.
Our next speaker is Jane Fehrenbacher to be followed by Judith McDermott.
Good morning, I'm Jane Fehrenbacher and I'm going to ask you if I may speak for Judith because she had to leave so she was going to read this paper. Go
ahead. All
right. I am also a member of CLU and a member of St Anthony's community For years, CLU has advocated for county funding to include permanent supportive housing for vulnerable justice-involved individuals as a compassionate and just alternative to recycling through the jail. We, the St. Anthony community support the program outlined in the Supportive Housing Pilot Project 2019 realignment budget And urge continued funding into the 2020 budget.
This novel way to solve the recidivism problem needs a committed, extended chance for success. Thank you and The signature is that the Jacqueline thank you community members and if I may, I would like to just tell you a little story. I've served meals at Casa Esperanza Path for many years and there was a gentleman I would see him there frequently well this last year I saw him down at The Thursday foot washing ceremony for the homeless and I said.
Well, hi. How are you doing? And he said I'm doing great. He said, I've been sober for nine months and I said how did that happen? He said, I got housing. I got a room all by myself. You know, he's in a group but that told me how very important it is for housing for individuals who are formerly homeless. Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next speaker is Art Fisher to be followed by James Robertson.
He gave me a statement because he had to leave. One sentence statement. He represents the Trinity Episcopal Church Justice and Outreach Council, and he says we at the Trinity Episcopal Justice and Outreach Council are in support of housing after incarceration as essential to reducing recidivism. Thank
you. Our next speaker is James Robertson to be followed by Lane Clark.
Good morning. First of all, as a person with hearing impairment I'd like to say this telecord system is wonderful. You can hear everything. The mass incarceration that our country is in is a blight upon our system A lot of, a large portion of the people in our jails and prisons are not really criminals. They're people that are suffering from mental illness and also from substance abuse and addiction to alcohol and drugs.
It's not always been like this. I grew up in the 40s and the 50s At that time, there were large institutions called insane asylums. People with mental health were housed in those. Those conditions were horrendous. It was decided in the late 50s and thereafter to do away with that system and to convert to a system that treated mentally ill people in a community setting.
The closure of the insane asylums was completed. However, the follow-up of creating community based mental health facilities was not. And it goes today, it goes largely unimpeded, unenforced. So this system Of treating people, offering people treatment rather than incarceration. Emphasizing rehabilitation and not correction or punishment. These are the things that we should do to be economically feasible And also because jails are very expensive and also more humane to have treatment for people in the community, loving and caring community.
So I thank you. I support this proposal. I think we should be doing much more in order Treat people humanely and not fill up these prisons and keeping people in solitary confinement. People waiting months and months in order to be evaluated for their competency, that's unconstitutional. Thank you very much.
Our next speaker is Lane Clark to be followed by Tricia.
Lane's not here.
Is Tricia here? To be followed by Father Larry Gosselin.
Hi, my name is Tricia and I'm withholding my last name out of respect and protection for my loved one. I speak to you today on behalf of Families Act. Well actually I stand before you today on behalf of Families Act but I speak to you as a very worried mother and a concerned citizen On behalf of Families Act, and I quote. We are pleased to see you allocate a portion of the safety realignment funds to transitional and supporting housing for persons with justice involved behavioral conditions caught up in the revolving door. We believe in investing in treatment beds for the thousands of persons suffering from mental health conditions.
As a mother, I urge you to do everything possible to increase the level of services available for our mentally ill. Up until a year ago my loved one was a productive member of this community and in the last year he's had a psychotic break. He has caused thousands of dollars in damage to our community by painting signs in his artwork. In addition to destroying two apartment buildings, I have been unable to get him help. Apparently you cannot voluntarily admit yourself into a mental facility unless you say you're suicidal and my loved one truly believes that he is an assassin trained by the CIA to perform hits for the good of mankind Protection of us all, and I live in fear every day that the next phone call I receive will be telling me that he is dead or has caused somebody else's death.
I pray everyday that he is arrested because it is my only means of trying to get him help. But he is one that is involved in that revolving door, that they say an estimated 60% of the jail population is mentally ill. He doesn't even figure into those numbers because they won't do anything about it. They listen to me and they tell me that he actually has to hurt somebody before they can do something.
To me, he truly believes this. So there's a very fine line between his reality and our reality. And I hope it scares you and helps you to put whatever funds are available into mental health care. I find it really scary. I have been told repeatedly by the Sheriff's Department again that he has to hurt somebody One of the times he was dropping things off our second story balcony, and the next up were three 16-pound bowling balls onto a main street in Solvang.
I just remind you that it is the level of care and the services that we provide that determines our quality of life and our community that we live in. And I see that I am about out of time. So, I just urge you to do whatever you can because we need help out there. There really just isn't anything available and I worry that should I ever get him well? How do I re-assimilate him into the community and does help people because somebody needs to be there. We can't just release these people out onto the streets and our front lawns to fend for themselves.
I support this measure, and I support anything that you can do to help. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Father Larry Gosselin to be followed by Harold Hill.
2:27 – 2:3514 turns
Honorable members of the Supervisory Board, thank you for your service to our community. I come here as a concerned citizen but also representative of Old Mission Santa Barbara and St. Barbara Parish. I have a history of working with the homeless people in Seattle Washington. I was the founder of St. Martin de Porres Shelter, sleeping 200 individuals there every night in the downtown area of Seattle on Skid Road So I understand the complexity of homelessness and also the complexities for the individuals in homeless, and the complexities to society in our economic situations that cause homelessness. So I know as a concerned religious person motivated by religious values that how we treat the most vulnerable people in our society is representative of how we are as a community.
We are starting a community center through St. Vincent's Ministry and Old Mission Santa Barbara, Father Virgil Cardona Center, drop-in center for the homeless. We presently have 100 people that come to our center, it's a day center, drop in center so we're making...it's a drop in the bucket And our next speaker is Harold Hill, who is our final speaker.
Greetings, Mr. Chair and members of the board. My name is Harold Hill. I'm a member of the Live Oak Unitarian Universalist Congregation Social Justice Ministry and a member of CLU. And we are so thankful that you have been listening and participating in CLU's justice work to secure funding for those vulnerable and unhoused in our community and in our jail. Together we are making progress in the 2019-2020 realignment plan with the $2,450,000 that has been allocated for reserves for the supporting of the transitional housing rapid housing plan.
As a member of CLU Santa Barbara and a supporter of their social justice work with the interfaith community, I urge you to support and implement the housing project in the public safety realignment plan for fiscal year 2019-2020 to be submitted by the Community Corrections Partnership. Supportive housing provides compassionate and just alternative to cycling through jail and justice involved individuals. I encourage planning ahead for the pilot housing project funding to be included in an ongoing budget as soon as possible.
Thank you very much for recognizing the needs of the most vulnerable in our community.
And that was our final speaker.
Thank you very much. Any staff comments on anything you heard? Any questions, okay. Any questions from board members? I heard... Oh! Mr. Mullikin
was looking for a light. Chair Labagnino and Supervisor Williams there were some inquiries about the budget and the staffing of the Alternative Sentencing Bureau and Lieutenant Ryan Sullivan from the Sheriff's Office can answer those questions.
Supervisor Williams to the Chair. Directly to your question of whether we see a need for the Alternative Sentencing Bureau in the future within the Sheriff's Office, we definitely do. I think we have seen a definite decrease in the population over the past couple years as a result of Proposition 47 which minimized penalties for some of the crimes as well as the collaborative efforts of our partner agencies, probation, the courts, district attorney's office and public defender's office In steering some of those clients that were particularly low level offenders or low risk offenders out of our criminal justice, are out of our jails and correctional facilities. And so that decreased the number of candidates, or good candidates in our eyes which has led to a decrease in the population.
We have seen the budgets decrease for those units as well as a whole. A rough estimate from years ago was about a million dollars that we spent on ASB, which for a population of generally around 100 was much better alternative use of funds than incarcerating those individuals in the county jail system.
And just on the question of sort of where are we headed? Have we run up against a wall, or have we run out of people that are good candidates, or do we just need to have the proper supervision to expand some of the people that we would supervise.
I think there's a couple different options. In my opinion, we're probably somewhere in the sweet spot. As of yesterday, we have 90 individuals out on the program from the Sheriff's Office on their Sheriff's Office Program. And another 300 or so that are sentenced in the jail. So just under 25% of our sentence population is on an alternative sentencing course of supervision.
I think that's a pretty high number, or pretty good number depending on how you look at it especially since there's only 7% or so low risk offenders in our jail. So I think we're in a sweet spot. I think we're probably going to see a leveling out of that. Anywhere from 5-15% of our total population probably over the next few years would be out on alternative sentencing.
So you think the percentage will go down just simply because the crimes that we used to view as safe to alternatively sentence are not facing as many months in sentencing?
Primarily, my opinion would be more about the risk level. So as opposed to the specific offense that they're in on it would be what their risk level is and what their risk to the community is. And I think as we do a better job system-wide with all the other diversionary programs we have and the other options for sentencing, as opposed to incarcerating them.
Whether it's programs or any other alternative type of sentencing, we'll see a different clientele in our jail. So it may decrease slightly but I think for the foreseeable future we're definitely going to have a need for this program and we anticipate continuing with it.
And is there any populations that we just don't have the right supervision and services to but have a relatively low risk? I mean, I could imagine there's just very different needs out there in the population depending on addiction or dependent on mental health issues. Is there a population out there that
Supervisor
Williams. There are 2, 2 of the pending grants that we have one that we we know we're going to receive and the other And increasing supervision, increasing pre-arrest alternatives so that they don't go to jail in the first place. So the answer to your question and I think you touched on it was that the population that is dealing with substance abuse and a population that's dealing with mental illness, that's really going to be the next target group. And the hope quite frankly is that we divert them before they ever get to the jail. That's at least The framework that we're operating under.
If you notice in the realignment budget, there was a fairly dramatic drop in sheriff's detention alternative. That was due in part to the transfer of two positions to programming versus monitoring because that population as the lieutenant pointed out has essentially stabilized. Well, I want to
thank you and I want to thank the lieutenant. I saw him there but I didn't want to put him on the spot but I'm glad he's always ready to rush into the breach says a lot about you and your department. Thanks.
2:35 – 2:4212 turns
All right very good. I don't see any other questions. Can we get a motion?
Move ABC of the staff report. Second.
It's been moved and seconded all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Thank you very much, great work. Okay that will take us to our final item of the morning which I believe is item number three.
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, departmental item number three is from planning and development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding accepting the California Coastal Commission's CCC's conditional certification of the accessory dwelling unit ADU article two coastal zoning ordinance article two. Amendment case number 16 ORD 16 as an amendment to the county certified local coastal program.
Good morning, Chair Lavagnino and members of the board. I have Ms. Jessie Steele here, the project manager for this project here to make the presentation on behalf of P&D. So I'll turn it over to Jessie. Thank
you. Good morning, Chair Lavagnino and supervisors. Again my name is Jessie Steele and today I'm here to present the Accessory Dwelling Unit Local Coastal Program Amendment or ADU-LCPA. On August 14th of 2018, your board adopted an ordinance amending Article 2, the Coastal Zoning Ordinance to revise existing development standards and permit procedures and to implement state law regarding ADUs.
The board also adopted a resolution authorizing staff to submit the ADU-LCPA to the Coast Commission for review and certification. On March 7th of 2019, the Coastal Commission conditionally certified the ADU-LCPA. And today the board will consider accepting the Coastal Commission's conditional certification by adopting a resolution which is included as attachment 2 to the board letter.
If your board accepts the conditional certification then staff will submit the resolution to the Coastal Commission and the Coastal Commission's executive director will then make a determination regarding the county's action on the ADU-LCPA And he will report this determination to the Coastal Commission at its next regularly scheduled public meeting, which will likely be in June or July.
If the Coastal Commission does not object to the Executive Director's determination then the certification will be deemed final and the ADU-LCPA will go into effect immediately within the coastal zone. The Coastal Commission conditionally certified the ADL-CPA with some minor suggested modifications which are laid out on the next couple slides For example, these modifications revised the formatting and headings of various sections.
They clarified that coastal development permits for ADUs are not ministerial and do not require a public hearing. And they add text requiring ADUs to comply with all applicable lighting requirements in community plans and overlay districts as well as all applicable environmentally sensitive habitat policies and provisions in the county's local coastal program or LCP.
Additionally, the suggested modifications require compliance with agricultural protection policies and development standards of the LCP. They require new detached ADUs to be clustered with existing structures to the maximum extent feasible. They require the replacement of protected trees that are removed or damaged due to ADU development. And lastly The suggested modifications add a new standard to prohibit ADUs within existing accessory buildings that are non-conforming as to coastal resource protection policies and coastal resource protection development standards in the LCP.
Staff is amenable to these suggested modifications, as they do not present significant policy or textual changes to the ADU LCPA. And in fact many of these revisions simply duplicate existing policies within the county's Therefore, staff recommends that your board accept the modifications and authorize staff to submit the ADU-LCPA to the Coastal Commission for final certification.
Staff also recommends that your board determine that the preparation and adoption of the ADU-LCPA is exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA guidelines sections 15282H and 15265 CEQA guidelines section 15282H provides a statutory exemption for cities and counties to adopt ADU ordinances that implement state law. And CEQA guideline section 15265 statutorily exempts local government activities involving the preparation and adoption of an LCP.
So in conclusion, staff recommends that your board take the following actions which are laid out in detail on page one of the board letter. First, receive the Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the ADUL-CPA with the suggested modifications. Second, adopt a resolution accepting the Coastal Commission's conditional certification. Third, determine that the board's action is exempt from CEQA and fourth, direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted resolution to the Coastal Commission.
And that completes my presentation and staff is available to answer any questions.
Any questions from staff. Do you have any public comment.
Chair let me know members of the board we have no request to speak on this item.
All right. Get a motion
I'll move A through D of the staff recommendation.
Second
moved and seconded all those in favor. Aye aye. Any opposed. Well that was pretty tidy Right on. Yes, a couple of times. Let's hope it works. Let's hope it works, yeah. All right so what we're going to do is we're going to take a, well let's hear from Mr. Gazzone first about closed session.
2:42 – 2:476 turns
Chair and supervisors, we can be ready to move into closed session right after we break here. And today in closed session you're noticed to consider two items of litigation. The first existing litigation Hample versus County of Santa Barbara. The second one matter of anticipated litigation which is a conference with legal counsel and then ten public employee performance evaluations including agricultural commissioner behavioral wellness, child support services, community services. General services, probation, public defender, public health, public works and social services. My estimate for the two litigation items is a total of about 30 minutes and you've heard from the CEO that her estimate for public employee performance evaluations is another 30 minutes or so.
Okay very good. So what we're going to do is take a ten minute break. We'll move into closed session at about 10 till. And then we'll try to be back by one o'clock
okay? you Hello.
Good
morning.
Music The
2:47 – 3:241 turns
The Hello. . . You. Hi. You. Thank you. Yeah. you You. Thank you. Yeah. you Yeah. You. You. you Hello.
3:25 – 4:032 turns
Good morning. Music Music Music
The . . . . You. Hello. You. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Music Thank you. You. Yeah. Music Thank you. you you Hi.
4:04 – 4:282 turns
Hello everyone. Music
I'm Music Hello. you You. Hi. Music Thank you. Yeah. You. you
4:30 – 4:359 turns
Okay, we're going to reconvene. And can we get a update from closed session please? Mr. Gazzone.
Chair and supervisors, today in closed session the board considered two matters of litigation. The first is Robert Hample versus Santa Barbara County Probation Department. Next is decision to initiate litigation as well as ten public employee performance evaluations for Agricultural Commissioner, Behavioral Wellness, Child Support Services, Community Services, General Services, Probation, Public Defender, Public Health, Public Works and Social Services. There are two reportable items.
In the matter of Robert Hample versus the Santa Barbara County Probation Department, the board unanimously approved county council's recommendation not to seek further appellate review and in a separate matter, uh, the board unanimously approved county council's recommendation that the county initiate litigation against HVI Cat Canyon Incorporated to recover unpaid fees and administrative fines. Both of those votes on decisions to initiate litigation again were unanimous. No further reports.
Okay. Very good, so that takes us to item number four. Madam Clerk can you please read that in?
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, departmental item number four is from public health. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding emergency medical services systems review and authorization to negotiate a fourth amendment with American Medical Response West.
Dr. Reynoso
Good afternoon, Chair Lovenino and members of the board. I'm Wanda Renoso, Public Health Director, and with me here today is Nick Clay, EMS Agency Director. Unfortunately Dr. Angelo Salvucci, our EMS Medical Director, and Fitch Associates, our consultants can't be here today for the presentation. Today, you'll receive an overview of the findings from phase one of the EMS system review as well as an update on our progress for phase two and phase three. We'll be providing you with the EMS agency plan to review these findings and when your board can expect a recommendation from us to whether renegotiate or to go to RFP.
Lastly, we ask that you accept our recommendation to renegotiate a one year extension to the current AMR agreement. To allow for the EMS agency to complete the EMS system review, evaluate the findings and develop a recommendation for your board. So in short this is not today's conversation, today's presentation is not an RFP versus renegotiation conversation that will happen this fall. When we come back with detailed information and detail robust analyses for your consideration.
The reason why we are requesting a one year agreement extension, the current ambulance contract expires at the end of this year on December 31st. The EMS system review has been delayed by natural disasters, Thomas Fire, the 190 brief flow and subsequent emergencies and storms so we're a little bit behind our schedule. There are two options in front of us for your board to consider eventually, and to RFP or to renegotiate. And both of these have unique sets of risks and benefits quite complex. And so we hope to come back in the fall with options. However, the one year extension will allow us time to review the options, meet with stakeholders, engage with the community, provide information for your consideration.
So to give you a quick recap as to where we are today.
I'm not sure your
microphone's on there. There we go. Testing, one two three? All right. So in December of 2016 the board provided direction to conduct a comprehensive EMS system review. The EMS agency contracted with Fitch and Associates, a well-known vendor with over 30 years of consulting experience in this arena. The EMS agency then reviewed, review was designed to provide really a roadmap to developing EMS system enhancements that promoted the triple aim approach And we'll jump into the triple aim in just a second here.
Phase one was just an assessment period in which we did ten questions that we had presented to Fitch, and they also provided an eight-point SWOT analysis. We began those meetings in March of 2018, engaged with over 70 different participants from 30 different agencies. Fitch also conducted a comprehensive data review, and that review was presented to our EMS agency and to the stakeholders in August of 2018.
We are currently in phase two. We call this system design, but it's essentially providing solutions to the problems that we found in phase one. And it's designed to really just do a deep dive into some key issues as opposed to really driving into the entire system. Phase three is the road map to once we've figured out what the problems are, we figure out what the solutions that we want to implement are. Phase three is designed to give us a path to follow to put these things into place.
4:35 – 4:514 turns
The triple aim framework. Since EMS is a larger picture, a part of the larger healthcare system we are using the triple aim framework in our redesign and systems review. So essentially the triple aim is a framework developed by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement It's a widely internationally accepted framework for doing systems review, especially in health care.
The consideration here is when you look at the systems and you want to do review and you want to come up with a new and improved system or redesign that system, you take into consideration what is the population health? What are the health outcomes? How can the new system or the new redesign improve the patient experience, or the quality of care? And will the per capita cost be reduced. So these are the three tenets that we consider when we look at a systems review. On the, that would be your right hand side. The pink triangle this is a version that's from New Zealand and it shows the broad reach of triple aim for the individual looking at the patient experience and so this is where we not necessarily look for patients satisfaction but we look at is it safe?
Is it effective? Is it patient centered? Is the care delivered timely? Is it delivered efficiently, and is it equitable? Then you look at the population reach. Do you engage the community partners working together so that you address the broader determinants of health? And lastly, the redesigned system. Does it reduce the per capita cost so that the resources can be reallocated within the healthcare system? So this is the framework by which we are Considering or guiding our work.
So to dive into the system review, the EMS agency broke these findings into really three key areas. The EMS system, findings related to the EMS agency and then findings related to the AIM-1's agreement. The EMS system issues are really complex issues. They involve larger patient populations, they're systemic in how their They're groups. They require a multidisciplinary approach to resolve, not any one group or provider can fix these concerns or address these concerns and they'll take a long time to fix given their nature.
It is key to note that there were some findings with regards to the dispatch services that are provided in the county however we chose not to highlight them in this presentation to not overlap with the CEO's current project. There is findings related to EMS agency which in and of itself I think is explanatory in terms And then last is the aim of agreement findings are primarily findings that are a result of the limits of the ambulance agreement and can be addressed with a new agreement, whether that's via the RFP process or the renegotiation process.
So to dive into these three different areas there's a couple different successes and challenges that we'd like to highlight with you today. First and foremost if the county is served by dedicated group of professionals both in their front of the field and in the back office as we talked about this morning. Fitch validated that the county EMS system, cardiac arrest save rate is almost 30% higher than the national average. It's one of the highest in the country and Dr. Savucci has been presenting his findings in this approach internationally to places like Europe and Russia as well.
There's no surprise that the volume of mental health patients which are complex patients to manage with long transports have a significant impact to our EMS system. Our providers are doing great community outreach, however that outreach isn't coordinated at a county level. And additionally the EMS agency should be acting as a centralized hub for complaints and commendations.
Looking at findings related to the EMS agency, the report highlighted the EMS agency's relationship with law enforcement. We work well together and increase their capacity to provide care in the EMS system. And while not listed in the Fitch Report this partnership has gained a lot of momentum over the past few years as we've introduced NARCAN to law enforcement professionals to help with opioid overdoses.
The report also highlighted that the Ems Agency is charged with a broad set of state regulations and contractual obligations to manage. This highlights the broad range of responsibilities we have. And with the addition of new leadership and some staff turnover, there's been some structural challenges and changes we've had to implement, and we've been noted to slowly implement change within that system as well.
Last but not least, findings related to the ambulance agreement. In 2008, the country experienced some financial challenges. Years later, the Affordable Care Act presented additional financial challenges to the healthcare system. Both these have the potential to have negative impacts on the fiscal stability of the EMS system and their providers. AMR was noted as being able to pay their financial contributions to the fire department, to dispatch into the EMS agency without requesting subsidies from the county, as experienced in some other counties.
However, the current agreement does have some structural challenges that prevent flexibility like the requirement to staff all AMR ambulances with paramedics or what we call ALS as opposed to providing additional flexibility. And additionally, AMR has had some periods in time in which recruitment strategies haven't always kept up with the attrition rate. Now this is the exciting part of the presentation so please buckle your seatbelts.
Let's talk about the financial side of this equation. So Fitch's methodology was they reviewed audited financials from AMR and County Fire, financial reports. And there is the wow factor of the $82 million that has been charged in ambulance services across this system per year. This represents the total number of ambulance transport charges and does not represent the actual collections of those charges.
It's key to remember, EMS is health care. So we have to look at it that same way. So when we look at this, we look at it much like an explanation of benefits. So you've gone to see a doctor. Your hospital charge is x. Your physician charges x. Your insurance provider allows y and they paid y which means you may be responsible for z. That same principle can be applied here.
And the next steps will talk about how that insurance mix really plays a role in this collection rate The other thing to note is that our collection rate for the county was 24%. This is noted as being fairly common in high performing systems. And looking across the state, we are not dramatically different than other systems in the state. That leaves us with a net collection of $19.8 million in the system. Does not account for operational expenses which include things like vehicles, payroll, insurance etc.
While that is certainly a fair dollar amount, it's key to recognize also that healthcare reform really does have an uncertain future in the state and in the country. And will impact EMS funding as we move forward. It's a fairly busy slide so I want to give you a quick orientation to where we sit on this slide. So if you look at the far left these two graphs represent the net collections as a percentage of providers' transports.
The blue bars are the percentage of transport total for that provider. So if we're looking at the far left, that first blue column, 52% of AMR's transports in this system were insured by Medicare. The green bar is the percentage of net collection of that provider. So that means that while 52% of the volume of transports from Medicare, they actually collected 39% of their overall net revenue from Medicare.
These 2 grass one presents on the left and are the one of the right presents County fire. And we look at this graph we look AMR's transport volume is about 96% of the county's transport volumes we tend to use that as a proxy for our mix across the county and what I like to draw your attention to is a few different things looking at 52% and 25% are the first two numbers in that graph, which means that essentially almost three quarters of AMR's transports come from government insured patients.
So what's the impact? So what that 50% of their patients are Medicare, or 42% of county fires patients are Medicare. On average, Medicare pays about $510 per transport. Medi-Cal pays about $120 per transport. So while we don't have the operating costs of each one of those transports I can assure you it's not going to meet the actual cost of those transports. The rest of the bill remains unpaid if the patient portion isn't paid.
So this just helps highlight the impact of the insurance mix within our county. And that frankly, we'll probably never get to that gap between $19.8 million and $82 million because even though we charge a certain amount, we're never going to collect that based on the Medicare and Medi-Cal mix.
I have a question right there. I'm having a hard time with the three bullet points below the AMR transport net collections? Yes sir. I am trying to marry up the first statement with the last statement. Explain that to me please. Because it looks like, the way I'm reading it is 77% of the transports represent 45% of the collections. But only 13% of the calls represents half their collections.
The bottom bullet refers to the private insurance which is the third column to the right where it says 13% of the call volume is private insurance but that represents half of their net collections. Did that answer your question sir? So if we can't meet that gap, can we look at additional funding streams? So in 2016 when we presented to the board there was direction to look at additional revenue options for ambulance collection.
So there's ground emergency medical transport which is also referred to as GEMT. There's intra-governmental transfer which is referred to as IGT and then there's the quality assurance fee which is called QAF. We like our acronyms in EMS. So essentially what Fitch found was that GEMT would have a limited impact based on previous collections by what they referenced in Contra Costa County Fire. Contra Costa County Fire estimated they would make about $5 to 6 million in GEMT reimbursements, they only collected about 11% to 14% of those GEMTs funds.
Additionally, that patient volume only represents about 900 calls or 3% of the patient volume in our county. So even if we could collect those additional funds, we would only be doing that on 3% of those transports. Next is the intra-governmental transfer which is essentially just an option or a pool of money that'd be available for healthcare providers. That money's already being utilized to its full extent within the county so there are no available funds for us to draw from.
Last that Fitch reviewed was called the Quality Assurance for your QAF. It's a brand new program at the time of the phase one report, so no data was available to provide if that was going to be a valuable reimbursement option. Although it is available to both public and private providers. Additionally, a new program was unveiled this year called ET3. It is a new Medicare reimbursement program. So we don't have any information on that but it is certainly another option for us. to explore, and I think the key takeaway is there's just not a pot of gold that's out there for EMS funding. It's going to be a real challenge for us to find those additional streams and we want to make sure that we have fiscally stable system.
And then additionally Fitch looked at the investments back into the system. So reoccurring themes in these discussions was looking at ways to increase the revenue back into the EMS system. As a part of their contractual obligation, AMR has been meeting those contractual financial obligations over the past 14 years of the contract. And in total I've contributed $39 million into this system.
And it increases a little bit every year, but currently they're at about $3.4 million per year that gets contributed back into the EMS system. 44% goes to dispatch, 35% is divided among the fire agencies, 4% to a technical support contractor for our EPCR or patient care record system. 14% goes to EMS oversight and then 3% goes through the infrastructure of the radio system.
Also not listed in this slide were some initial financial commitments made at the beginning of the contract. $500,000 to upgrade the dispatch computer center or system and $273,000 to purchase electronic patient record system. And now we're in phase two. So we've taken all of the stakeholder feedback Fitch has provided that report and then beginning in March or April this year, we started phase two. We expect the report to be sometime in July hoping for mid-July but I won't commit to when we'll get that it should be no later than the end of July Phase two is intended to be a deep dive into these problems. So rather than re-engaging the entire group of stakeholders, we selected a smaller group, a smaller representation of those stakeholders to allow for a much deeper conversation to really get after some of these components of the system issues.
We initially in the RFP for this EMS system review it was written that the EMS agency would select these findings and we would present them to the stakeholders. We opted to change that and ask the stakeholders for feedback to help us decide which were these key elements We conducted a survey to get those findings and additionally received a letter from the Santa Barbara County Fire Chiefs Association outlining their priorities. That list was handed to Fitch and also incorporated into these phase two discussions.
We ended up discussing four key areas, looking at our vulnerable populations, looking at the inter-facility transport system which is really hospital to hospital patient movement. We looked at the mental health patient impact on the system and how can we find alternate ways to explore and mitigate that risk and challenge? And then looked at some operational clinical quality improvement metrics to see if we can measure what we want to improve and then start improving those components.
So those discussions were held in April, and we should get a response back hopefully by mid-July. We did get some notes from Fitch, so just some key highlights, some key areas to explore Looking at social services, behavioral wellness, public health. There's a lot of overlap with these different varieties of agencies that touch the same patients. So how can we get everyone together in the same room and find out how we can be a little bit more efficient in handling some of these patients and get them to the right resource at the right time?
We looked at developing different quality improvement metrics for our inter-facility transport. How can we make it better and really measure that improvement? Looked at alternate transport options for patients on psychiatric holds. As we discussed, that was one of the key concerns and then look at safety metrics for our patients and crew. So where do we move forward with regards to our recommendation to your board? As Dr. DeRuonoso mentioned, we'll be coming back in the fall for that more detailed discussion.
But essentially over the summer, phase 2 and phase 3 will receive that report by mid to late July. We've asked Fitch to wrap in the phase three component which is that road map to phase two. Then we'll have all of those system enhancements that will be provided in that phase two report. Evaluate those for compare them against a triple lane framework and then evaluate them against what we call manner and scope of the current EMS plan.
We'll then present those findings, review those findings and then present a recommendation to your board in the fall or the winter. Not listed in this slide is today should your board agree with the recommendation and provide authorization to renew or negotiate that one year term extension will be coming back by about 60 days to present that renewed agreement to you as well.
4:51 – 4:5712 turns
So to recap, all three phases of the EMS system review are expected to be completed by mid-July. The report that we presented to you highlighted that there are numerous areas in our current system that we are doing well. It also identified various areas where there are opportunities for improvement. Any enhancement that we conduct or we look at in partnership with our stakeholders will be guided by the triple aim framework, looking at health, looking at outcomes and looking at costs.
And we are very committed to coming back in the fall with the robust analyses for your consideration on the RFP option or the renegotiation option. And with that, we are open to any questions that you may have.
Okay. Questions from board members? Do we have any requests to speak?
Chair Lavagnino and members of the Board, we have no requests to speak from the public.
Supervisor Williams. Well, I guess this would be a question for you and for the Chiefs. I mean, I know a 12-month extension is enough time for renegotiation. Is it enough for an RFP process? Sort of my question.
If we were to renegotiate... if the board directs us to renegotiate the current contract So that it contains all the elements of a systems redesign. We believe that we can do it within one year if the board directs us to go towards RFP route based upon what we know in other counties, we believe that that process would take minimally two years
Then I guess I would put out there why wouldn't we just ask for an 18-month extension so that we would have two years from the onset.
Did you want to weigh in, Mr. Gazzani?
Chair and supervisors, so we've worked closely with Public health on this and I think it at 10,000 feet The piece to keep track of is what are the scope of the changes whether it's in a contract with the same vendor? Or whether it's an RFP that gets competed and the scope of those changes will dictate a Whether this is something that has to go to the state EMS authority for pre-approval or not, and that's a hard piece to actually quantify on a timeline. But I think if there were more than minor changes, a year is probably short. If they were just minor changes, Close to right, but I think if there are any significant outcomes from this three phase review that would be incorporated even in a contract with the same vendor.
We might be looking at clearance through the state EMS authority which is not a fast moving process.
And so 12 months might not be enough 18 would be better because it gives us two years from now
Supervisor Adam Well, you know this set of circumstances is It is what it is and I don't think it's gonna change And none of them were going to change it and and I don't know if the characterization Of the net value of the system and all that. I don' know if I totally bought that or not but I don't see any choice but to go out for an RFP. I think just renegotiating this deal is not, it's not a good deal.
Let everybody who wants in on it put in their proposal and we'll sift through them and figure out which one's the best choice for us and move forward. But you know, you just keep kicking the can down the road I think we're getting told that a lot of things are bad here and there's no value in this system, but it seems like everybody wants to serve it. Then they want to serve the parts they want to serve and unfortunately Chief Hartwig is not here, but they want to serve the parts they want to serve, but then they just make you serve the rest of them. I think that's nonsense.
So somebody needs to do the job here and whether that's Chief Hartwig or some consortium that he wants to put together, or AMR wants to step up and put in a bid for the entire thing. Or somebody else from somewhere else. I think we need to throw this thing open and find out who will make us the best deal and take it. Supervisor Williams?
I am with you 100%. I believe that we need to have our look at all of our options. The only way we could do that is to have an RFP and we won't, will be boxed in if we're allocating not enough time to do an RFP process. So that's why I'm advocating for 18 months instead of 12 months.
Okay so let's do 18 months and an RFB.
4:57 – 5:0320 turns
Chair Levenu and Supervisors, I think 18 months your direction would be for the department to go back and negotiate that so we would still have to negotiate that 18 months. But since the department didn't expect to have that discussion about RFP or not it's completely at the board's discretion but I just want to give the department a chance to give the pros or cons of doing RFP or deciding at this point.
Thank you very much. Members of the board, while we certainly appreciate the challenge of kicking the can down the road and the benefits that present with an RFP, did the board charge us with a task? And I was doing EMS system review to bring those findings back to you. I think in fairness to that process, we should let that process complete and then bring you back those findings. We haven't had the opportunity to complete that process yet and By going down that path, it's a very complex RFP. It's not a simple process and it does put us at some risk to do that so if we're gonna accept those risks I think it's in all fairness that we review that.
Okay Mr. Ghazani?
Chair and supervisors, just so we're talking the same units. I think that the recommendation in public health's or in the agenda talks about an additional year that would run through December 31st 2020. So it's actually roughly 18 months from now. So we've been talking about a year, 18 months but I think that the actual action is closer to 18 months from today if this was to move forward.
If the board was interested in the RFP process that would be something that That would require action by the state EMS authority and we would also Not that we would need to do it today or even six months from now, but if there was an RFP process It's one where we would want to work with the CEO's office and the board for whatever training and structures would ensure procurement integrity in that process We didn't have people inadvertently Influencing the process and then potentially being a bidder in that same process so I can picture spending some time on getting that right So that the experiences of other counties were not our experiences. This is an area that is appealed and litigated with some frequency Okay,
so the reality is even if we said in 18, I mean no matter what we're doing a year And so if we did it from right now, it's still 18 months. So at 18 months is fine.
Well and the reason why I said 18 months is because that's two years from now which is enough time.
Eighteen months from the end of the contract?
Right.
Okay not 18 months from today is not too-
Twelve months is really 18 months and 18 months is really 2 years. Understood okay. So I agree with Supervisor Adam. I think you know whether this is asking for a different And so I am I would be comfortable giving direction for
They're not done collecting the information yet. So based on what Mr. Gazzone said, which is this is very contentious matter that could be litigated. I would like to err on the side of let's bring all the information together first and you're talking about coming back in 60 days correct? Correct. Okay so 60 days from now we can decide We're still talking. Probably 2 years
from now
When we would that would give us plenty of time still so. I think I think it's probably wiser even though it's not you know, we all want to move fast but what's that saying fast correct and something else you choose to I don't remember Mister goes on he gives us that basket cheap. I'd rather wait till July is not that far away let's get the information back make a reasoned decision at that point and push You know if we want to go with an RFP, we go with an RFP and we're still going to get it done in the same time frame I think so. That would be my only choice. Supervisor Hartman?
I agree and I'd like to make that motion.
I'll second it. Okay there's no public comment. I think we're all saying the same thing basically.
So the motion is an 18 month extension but we come back with both options in July. Is that good? Is that doable
staff?
Can I have a moment of clarification? Sure. So we were thinking of coming back in the fall, so September-October for that RFP versus renegotiation conversation. The Fitch will give us their final report in July but that will give us a little bit more time to package it and bring it back to your board for that conversation.
So what's taking Fitch? How long have they had this thing? And they're not here? That's another question I had before the meeting started, is that our consultants not here for this? This is the hearing we've had. That's a little disconcerting too. I would prefer if they had been here.
So the challenge with BITS being here was the date changed a few times and they had a variety of other commitments so we just unfortunately due to changing dates it's hard to manage. Also the anticipation was this to be a presentation of results, not that RFP renegotiation discussion. So if we get the report they've committed no later than July 31st so if we were to get that before then we would have more time but then we would need time to measure those against the triple aim and then look at manner and scope.
5:03 – 5:0918 turns
Okay I think what you hear from the board is we want it done as soon as humanly possible and still staying within the guidelines that Mr. Ghazzani has laid down. I'd like to, it would be nice if they were here. I understand that we've changed the dates a few times. It would be nice if we could convey that to them. I'm sure you guys will do that in our stead and we'd like to get that report back as quick as can so you can get back to us.
I think we're still going to be within our 18 month window to be able to make that decision. I think the direction is there from the board and CEO understands that we would like this to be
moved quicker supervisor Adam okay so. So are we making a decision today to go out for RFP no OK so I won't be able to support the motion.
It was it wasn't agendized for that to start with.
So Supervisors what I'm hearing is that on your agenda, on the actions, the original request was to approve and authorize the Public Health Department to negotiate with AMR for one year but we're saying actually to extend the term through June 2021. Is that correct? June 2021, that's 18 months.
I believe we would have the discretion to ask for an RFP today, to your point Mr. Adam. But I also view it as progress if we're doing 18 month instead of 12 because that actually gives us enough time to have both options really out there instead of having to then go back and ask for an additional six-month extension if we want to go with an RFP. So my intention of bringing forth 18 months is so that we actually have both options instead of just the renegotiation as the only appreciable option that can be done within 12 months.
OK, I agree with that if I think if we sent you out for an RFP right now, you wouldn't really know what to put into it. So can I get a, you made a motion Supervisor Hartman do you want to clarify it?
But Mr. Gazzone has a puzzled look or? He always does that's
normal.
Thank you. I think that I certainly understand the direction today is to pursue this extension and I think that part of, I would like to relate to you and the public that part of what we did to prepare for this was we talked with other counties who had been through this process in any kind of recent events including Contra Costa and Alameda counties and have some sense of what a good process would look like It's not something we bring back in September, but it's something we work with you on. But I think that the hallmark of a good process if this was going to RFP is that any discussions of the qualifications or what we're looking for would be essentially open hearing items so all potential vendors are getting the same information at the same time and that's different sometimes than how some other items are worked with departments or the public coming in.
Now would be a good time to start thinking of this as the procurement integrity record that you would want to have in the event of an RFP 18-24 months from now. And my thought there would be that any discussion of qualifications or potential vendors would be something we do in open session until we come up with a process that ensures the procurement integrity that we would want to be able to defend down the road.
All right,
Supervisor
Hartman, would you like to make a motion?
So let's see if I have this right. We want to authorize the public health department to negotiate and return to the board with approval for an extension through June 2021, and then come back as soon as possible with the information from Fitch about what we need for RFP or renegotiation.
Okay, we all understand the motion. Great. The second supervisor heart roll call please.
Mr Adam. Mr Williams. Mr Hart is Hartman I chair loving you know
I
shouldn't pass this unanimously
awesome okay like to adjourn this meeting and we will meet next Tuesday June 4th in Santa Barbara It's not next Tuesday, it's June 4th. Thank you.