BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 13, 2020

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:01 – 0:031 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:31 · ≈ 9:01 AM

You. I'll now call to order the April 13th, 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors and budget workshops for fiscal year 2020 and 2021. Would the clerk please call the roll?

0:03 – 0:069 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:43 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Mr. Adam?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction3:47 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:47 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Mr. Lavinino? Here. Mr Williams? Here Ms Hartman? Here Chair Hart?

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:55 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here At this time please stand and join the board in pledging allegiance to the flag

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:05 · ≈ 9:04 AM

of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:21 · ≈ 9:04 AM

CEO Miyasato is there a CEO report today?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:26 · ≈ 9:04 AM

There's no report chair.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:28 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Thank you. Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:33 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, I have no changes to our agenda today but I do have a couple quick announcements. I did want to just remind the public once again that there are multiple ways to participate in our meeting and if a member of the public would like to submit a comment letter for the board whether it's on an item on today's budget workshops or not you can email the clerk at sbcobcountyofsb.org If you would like your letter to be read into the record, please state that in your email.

We are also allowing participation via phone and if you'd like to comment on any item on our agenda today or during general public comment, please call 805-568-2240 as you'll see scrolling on the top of your screen. State your name, your phone number and which item you'd like to speak on and the clerk will call you at the appropriate time Please make every effort to be available and mute all streaming devices once it is your turn to speak.

And during budget workshops today, I did want to also note for the public that there will be an opportunity for public comment provided at the conclusion of general overview, each functional group presentation, and each special issue. And my final announcement this morning is we did have a few Inquiries on whether we are allowing media in our hearing room this morning, and we are. And so if there any members of the media that are watching now and would like to participate in our hearing room you can come to our county building at 105 East Anna Pamu Street.

And the members of general services staff will escort you up here. And those are all my announcements.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role6:19 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Thank you I think we do have somebody downstairs who's a member of the media who might be on their way up. So thank you for that. Now's the time

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role6:27 · ≈ 9:06 AM

for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the agenda. Madam Clerk, are there any requests to speak on items not in the agenda today?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:36 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board I have no requests to speak on general

0:06 – 0:199 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:38 · ≈ 9:06 AM

public comment today. Okay

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role6:40 · ≈ 9:06 AM

thank you. The next item is departmental item number one could you please read that item into the record

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:46 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the county executive office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:01 · ≈ 9:07 AM

Good morning Chair Hart, members of the Board. I'd like to begin my update this week with a lot of thank yous so if I may. I would like to thank my team at the Public Health Department. We're seven weeks into the response we are not looking as fresh as we did on day one but the energy is still there, the commitment is still there and we are still going strong Secondly, I'd like to thank every county department. I can't imagine any department that hasn't sent staff to the Public Health Department or to the EOC. Thank you for contributing to this effort for the long hours.

And lastly, I would like to thank the CEO's office for their leadership, for their guidance and for making resources available for us to respond. I think that this crisis has shown me that we are strong as a county because we work together, we collaborate together and we partner together through the thick and thin. So thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role8:06 · ≈ 9:08 AM

And thank you Dr. Dobernoser for all the work and energy and creativity that you're bringing to this effort on a daily basis. Appreciate you recognizing your staff and all the other county employees too.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:18 · ≈ 9:08 AM

I'd like to begin with our COVID-19 by the numbers here in Santa Barbara County. As of yesterday, we have 267 cases and of those 162 are active. On your right are cases by the area with City of Santa Maria leading at 64. The Lompoc Federal Prison with 47 and that number has changed. With 41, City of Santa Barbara 35. Community of Orchid 27. South County Unincorporated Area at 16. North County Unincorporated Areas at 15. Unincorporated Areas of Goleta Valley and Gaviota at 11. City of Golita at 5. Santa Ynez Valley at 5 and Community of Isla Vista at 1.

Case status, we have again this is just a different way of looking at the numbers. So I'm going to be showing you graphs from using pies using trends just so that you can get a flavor of the numbers. So we have this yellow line reflects the total number of cases as of yesterday at 267 And then you have this blue line right here, ending yesterday at 162. These are the 162 active cases and the gray line following here 105 are fully recovered.

Yesterday we had three new cases and again we've experienced two deaths during this pandemic here in our county. So as you recall, the number of people hospitalized is something that we're very mindful of. It's something that we're watchful of. It is something that we monitor on a daily basis and here is a chart that describes the total number of people hospitalized since March 31st and with ICU as a subset So we are, there's really, we're leveling off but that's only one day. So this is really premature. This is very things are evolving and the ICU is holding steady between 17 and 18 and that is the orange line.

This is another way of looking at the cases recovery status So the orange is the 39% of our cases recovered. The 43% describes our cases recovering at home with the 14%, the gray, describing cases that are hospitalized. Age distribution of cases so oftentimes We have heard that the sentiment that this is something that's really affecting only older people. But as you can see in Santa Barbara County, we have a pretty good spread of cases throughout the age groups.

Orange group describes cases in their 50s to 69. The 35 purple segment describes people in their 30s to 49, so that's pretty sobering. Over the weekend, we were made aware of a model coming out of LA County. And this is a pretty I think good graphic that talks about the projected impact of physical distancing on spread. So the orange line and this is something similar that I've described to you in previous briefings So the orange line describes never began, distancing hasn't begun.

The red line describes stopping the physical distancing. With the blue line holding steady way down here as maintaining current level of social distancing. With the green line almost touching zero, describing what would it look like if more stringent physical distancing measures were to be put into place? So the takeaway for me here is the blow up of the center graph. Where you see the divergence in the number of cases drastically increasing if we let go of social distancing.

What this really means is described in this graph, so this is a projection of infection in LA County. If physical distancing was to one, reduce to pre-order level So here in this model, it's anticipated that 96% of residents will be infected over the course of the pandemic by August 1st. However if physical distancing is to be maintained at current levels you see a more steady at about 30%.

And if LA County were to increase above current levels, meaning putting into place even more stringent measures then they would experience about a 6%, 5.5 rounding up to 6% increase. So this is ultimate protection of vulnerable population as well as the healthcare infrastructure. So what are the takeaways? So I maintain that social distancing is working. The current Governor's Executive Order N33-20, which was issued on March 19th will be in effect until further notice. What that means is that our local government can put into place Through health officer orders, more restrictive measures but we can't be less restrictive.

Our local data as we have been monitoring suggests that physical distancing and public health directives have slowed down the spread of COVID-19. What we are modeling today looks so much different than just the model that I updated you three weeks ago. Reduction in physical distancing behavior may lead to rapid increases in cases and high demand for hospital services beyond our current capacity.

As I showed you in the previous slide with L.A County, staying at home and physical distancing will allow our hospital system to maintain intact and to provide services to all who need that level of care. So that said, we are in continuous conversations with CDPH and discussing what the future might look like. So on Saturday all of the jurisdictions were invited to be part of a conversation with CDPH and we talked about when and how Would the state or regional or local would lift the order and what would that trigger look like? And if our assumptions from the get go was to protect the vulnerable, and strengthen the health care system. At what point do we loosen the reins? And what would that look like at the local level, at the regional level and at the state level?

So I share that with you to demonstrate that this is a difficult period in our history, in our county. Not only do we have to contain and mitigate COVID-19 but we also have to acknowledge these societal And so we're aware of that and we are in constant conversation, not only with Sacramento but with our regional partners as well. Coordinated response, again one to remind our community that there is constant access to information. Our website has daily updates and that is www.publichealthsbc.org. As community members as we struggle with the shelter at home Lack of essential services, lack of freedom and whatnot. We do have help available so our community wellness call center emotional support number is 888-868-1649.

As always 211 is available 24 7 for any additional questions or support and we are guided by CDC and CDPH in our response. That concludes my update for this week. And I am open for questions.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role18:32 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Thank you, Dr. Dorinoso. It's very helpful information. Questions for staff? Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8418:41 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Just a clarification, will there be press conferences and if the public has questions can they direct questions to the media who can then ask them at the press conferences?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:53 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Yes. So our press conference is daily but however today's canceled and we will resume tomorrow at 430.

0:19 – 0:2420 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role19:05 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Any other questions any questions for Santa Maria?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction19:10 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Yeah, I think there's a couple up here. You want to go first?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8619:13 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Sure, I just had two. First off, I was asked by a number of people about masks as far as when they are required when you're out in public. I know a couple local grocers are requiring them. Is that individual businesses requiring them or is that part of our county public health directive? And if it's not part of the directive, is that going to happen? Or just give me the status of where we are with masks in public.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed19:45 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Supervisor Levinino through the chair, so for restaurants that face covering mandate is via our recently issued health officer order. The mask you're referring to, is that the mask that you are referring to?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8620:08 · ≈ 9:20 AM

No, I was more interested in grocery stores. So I know you have to wear one in a restaurant but what about at grocery store?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed20:14 · ≈ 9:20 AM

The grocery stores is right now it is up to the grocery stores but we are looking at expanding the need for other essential businesses to use face coverings. And it will be if when that time comes, it will be done through our health officer order in consultation with our county council.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8620:42 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Thank you one last question then and I'm looking at slide four which gives the hospitalizations and ICUs. And I guess this is probably better news than we had anticipated as far as a flattening of how those numbers originally increased and then leveled out. What is the capacity, when we talk about where that number is? What would that number have to get to before alternative care sites would be required? So what is the capacity of our local hospitals?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:16 · ≈ 9:21 AM

So it's roughly about 699. We had discussed a ramping up, even though while we are planning to stand up ACSs, we at 50% of that capacity would trigger us to speed up the standing up of those alternate care sites. So that's why we are monitoring the hospitalizations, the ICU and the vent usage on a daily basis. And not only do we get that data from the hospital real time but we are also validating those numbers via reports from CDPH.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8622:03 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Okay, great. So that's basically 700 hospital beds and then ICU has been basically staying static at 17, 16, 17, 18? Correct. So I'm assuming that we have the number for what that capacity looks like?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:20 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Yes, yes, we do.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8622:22 · ≈ 9:22 AM

All right, okay thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role22:24 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Thank you Supervisor Levin. Supervisor Adam?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction22:27 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Thank you. Dr. Del Reno so have you ever heard of the term herd immunity?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:33 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Yes, I have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed22:36 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Could you explain that for us please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:38 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Sure, herd immunity depending upon diseases can be achieved through either vaccination or it could be achieved when a certain number of the population has been exposed to that disease.

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction22:57 · ≈ 9:22 AM

But what would that mean?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:59 · ≈ 9:22 AM

So if you are referencing COVID-19, it means that a certain number of our population would have been exposed to the virus over a period of time. Thereby, a certain population is immune and that virus is transmitted at a lower pace

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction23:25 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Okay, I'm glad that you know about that now. I just have one other thing. There's a guy named Brian Goble that is going to get interviewed today by Bill McFadden on the NewsHawk website and their location there on Facebook. And he's a very smart guy who has been working on analysis of the data. And I think he's got some very encouraging observations and analysis that everybody should listen to and take what they can from that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:06 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you. Yes, thank you for that. I was made aware of that opportunity so our team will be participating in that live interview and take the opportunity to learn more about his viewpoints.

0:24 – 0:318 turns

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction24:24 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role24:25 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you very much. One thing that I have noticed as the conversation in the community is evolving to what next? You've described very well, what we have been doing and how successful physical distancing has been and how incredible the members of public throughout the county and the state have been in responding to that. And I think it would be helpful for you to describe a little bit about the complexity of going from, we are doing all of the personal hygiene. We are doing physical distancing and then what would be required to begin to loosen up some of the social distancing? I think what I've read is you need to be able to do robust testing of COVID. And that sounds like something that should be relatively easy to do. But it hasn't been for a variety of reasons, not related to the county of Santa Barbara.

Related to the availability of testing at the national level. Not just the availability of testing but if you take every piece of the testing process there have been shortages of supplies. There have been shortages of nasal swabs. There's been shortages of reagents. Files that are used to transport those tests to the labs. There are differences in the labs and the equipment that each of the labs uses, and so you can have a situation where you have extra capacity at one kind of machine that doesn't have capacity for another kind of machine. It'd be like trying to have a Ford steering wheel applied to a Chevy car. It doesn't work.

That's just for the COVID-19 testing. There has been questions about the efficacy of some of the testing. There is a question about if you have had COVID-19, whether or not that actually does confer immunity in the future. There is a great deal of scientific research being done about using serontology to determine antibodies There are a wide range of medical views about the effectiveness of that information and what that means for future infections. There is a huge issue of how you would scale that to be applicable into local communities and using that as a tool. And so, the reason I say all those things and ask you the question is it sounds relatively simple to say we're here and we need to get to there But getting there is incredibly complex and a massive logistical challenge.

And I think that is not clear at all to the public, and it would be helpful for you to take a little time to explain how complex that is.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed27:17 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Right. It is as complex as you've described. We need to get a handle on who's been infected, and we can only do that truly through testing. And only when we have tested widespread testing will we be able to quarantine, will we be able to do the contact tracing and then self-isolate and really hanker down and basically draw that box around the infections. However, that said testing is complex. There are testing that are done by the Public Health Department and that is where we get our ration from the state and then testing can also be done by the hospitals and they have their own platforms as you mentioned and it can be also done through a private medical group physician's office and they may choose any variety of the platforms to be tested.

What I'm encouraged by is the conversations in Sacramento about the need for increased testing and then also Going down the path of serology testing, and that's the Stanford task force that I think a lot of us have heard about. And that is something that I heard a rumor that could be up and going as soon as two or three weeks. And so we're hoping that once that is made available, a little bit more and see which members of our community has been exposed and may have that immunity. And on that immunity, as you mentioned, there's a wide variance of scientific literature. You see papers that say once you have demonstrated that you've been exposed, you could be 60% immune. I read somewhere this morning That there's a paper out of Italy that says only 10%.

So there's a wide variance. There's just, and I think that could be because we're so new into this. There are so many unknowns about the virus, about the mode of transmission, and about our immunity.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role29:51 · ≈ 9:29 AM

Thank you. Supervisor Williams, do you have questions?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction29:53 · ≈ 9:29 AM

Well, I'm very encouraged by you engaging in the conversations with California Department of Health with public health. Because it is, I think important for us to be part of the state conversation of how we move forward and how once certain benchmarks are reached that we could maintain a level of social distancing while lifting the stay at home order. It would take obviously a huge amount of thought, a huge amount of work.

to give the proper guidance for businesses and society to be able to function. But I do think it's a thought exercise that is really part of our mission to engage in, because the longer the stay-at-home order stretches, the more difficult it will be for families that are operating without incomes to survive. It's part of, we need to be part of that conversation of how to move forward.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed31:06 · ≈ 9:31 AM

I was really encouraged on the call on Saturday with CDPH about how open they were to hearing from the 58 counties and the three cities about the local struggles and what we grapple with. So, the information from the local jurisdictions, I think will be very critical to guide Sacramento in their decision making process.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role31:34 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Thank you. Any other questions or comments for staff? Next we'll go to public comments, are there any members of the public who'd like to speak on this item?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role31:44 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have three requests to speak by phone on this item. And we will go to our first caller Anastasia Stone to be followed by Lee Heller and then Angela.

0:32 – 0:388 turns

CommentAnastasia StoneProposedself-stated32:32 · ≈ 9:32 AM

Hi, my name is Anastasia Stone and I live in District 2. about what we're looking at and how the stay-at-home order is affecting people in our district in the mental health capacity. Specifically, have we looked at stats regarding suicides, admissions to mental health and overdoses as those can be huge triggers with people stuck at home losing jobs income and various other things especially with no end in sight?

And I just wanted to thank Thank you, Doss for talking about really getting back to things and having a conversation about it because I believe that the kind of just no discussion about when we will get back to normal actually makes these mental health issues worse. I personally know someone who took their own life and was triggered by this continued stay at home

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role33:48 · ≈ 9:33 AM

Thank you for that. We share your condolences for the loss of your friend. This is a very difficult time.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role34:10 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board we will now go to Lee Heller to be followed by Angela.

CommentLee HellerProposed34:50 · ≈ 9:34 AM

Thank you for all the hard work you and the staff are doing. This has been an extraordinary experience, and I'm in such great admiration of how hard everyone is working seven days a week to try to protect our community. I want to reassert a warning not to leap on data that seems to warrant physical distancing prematurely. Mr. Goebel has no experience in epidemiology nor distinguishing between different California communities Broad conclusion of the curve that we are seeing in California. As you know, Santa Barbara County is behind the curve of the larger cities. Our peak is not coming for a while yet but when you take his analysis into account consider the limitations of it. I think Dr. DeCorinos' presentation makes clear that we can't just assume a vulnerable population as one could wish That vulnerability is just more widely than we had been led by Chinese data.

So there's just no way to protect small group and let everything else go back to normal. I also want to let Dr., for Dr. Borenow, some comments about herd immunity. Herd immunity takes about 85% of the population having been exposed and protected, and we are nowhere near that yet. It's big from experience working for decades in the ant world. So as we move forward, Remember that, yes, economically people are really devastated by the stay at home orders. But if you leave them prematurely, the economy will crash again pandemic roars back and the very few people that are vulnerable now will be vulnerable again because they are already on the front lines of exposure. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role36:34 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Thank you, Miss Heller.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role36:38 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Chair Hart members of the board will now go to our final speaker and that is Angela

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed37:21 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Hi, I'm calling from Lompoc and over the weekend our City Councilman Mosby did a video conference where he actually graphed out the individual curves by cities in Santa Barbara County. And while most of the cities seem to be flattening everywhere they're not flattening in Lompoc. In fact we're accelerating and we're accelerating at almost the exact same rate as the federal prison. Lompoc Federal Prison has the worst cases of coronavirus second-worst cases of coronavirus for all federal prisons in the county What is the county planning to do about Lompoc? I didn't see them mentioned in the graphs at all and I haven't seen anything about contacting the Bureau of Prisons. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role38:01 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Thank you very much.

0:38 – 0:4720 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role38:05 · ≈ 9:38 AM

And that was our final speaker on this item.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction38:10 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Are there any other questions, Supervisor Williams? Well just because I think that's an important question and we don't allow the public to ask questions during public comment but Supervisors can, so just ask to understand what is going on at Wampoa Federal Prison and what is our participation in it. And are you assured that they are taking the proper measures?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed38:34 · ≈ 9:38 AM

So we have been in contact with the leadership at the Lompoc prison, and starting with their first case. And their cases are growing at a fairly rapid pace. The public health department supported by the unified command at the EOC, we have a four track effort. So the first track is working with the Lompoc leadership to be able to get Sacramento to send down A self-contained hospital unit that comes with the beds, the equipment, the resources and the personnel. So that's our first track. The second track is being available through our Lompoc Health Care Center, being available to test any of the staff who wants to be tested so that we can see what's going on. And the third track...

The third track, okay.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction39:52 · ≈ 9:39 AM

I think we'll have plenty of opportunities to put out

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:54 · ≈ 9:39 AM

the third track. I'm drawing a blank, I apologize. But regardless, we are, oh, I'm sorry. The third track is disease containment, of course and so hand in hand working with the prison leadership about how they are containing the spread of COVID-19 within their prison. So those three tracks are led by very seasoned members of my team, and now that we are supported by the unified command We are in conversations with the state. And we also are coordinating our lobbying, our advocacy for increased resources, critical timing with the hospital CEOs as well as our local, state and federally elected officials. Actually today we have two calls with the prison leadership.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction40:56 · ≈ 9:40 AM

And then just the previous person's question, I mean are we tracking or is Behavioral Wellness or some non-profit tracking the increase of suicidal ideality is I believe the term. And specific cases and other behavioral wellness problems that have arisen from the.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed41:21 · ≈ 9:41 AM

That's a great point, I think that there are in addition to the health impacts there are other impacts of COVID-19. I will be working with my colleagues in behavioral wellness to get that data, as well as with the sheriff and the DA's offices. To coordinate data about domestic violence, about child abuse, and as well as with unemployment. So those are the four major indicators that the state is also worried And so we were highly encouraged on Saturday to start looking at those impacts as well in our reporting.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role42:05 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Thank you. Thank you, any other questions and Santa Maria comments?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction42:14 · ≈ 9:42 AM

No I don't think so.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role42:15 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Okay, thank you very much. Thank you Dr. Doronoso for your presentation it's been very helpful I know the public everyone is very interested in knowing the most recent information and this has been very helpful we'll have another press conference tomorrow afternoon at 430 where we continue to answer any questions members of the media have and try to explain this very complicated subject. You know I think this is one of the most challenging things Certainly in my lifetime, communicating complex science and maybe even more difficult the complex logistics involved in responding to this crisis. I think people intuitively imagine that there are things and warehouses that can just come to a community and be deployed and be ready to go and get us where we would imagine we need to be.

And that has not proven to be the case. And in spite of that, we have been able to get the public to understand the stakes involved in this and more importantly, to act in a really incredibly powerful way to change the rate of infection in our community and throughout the state. In an awesome way, you know to understand that we could communicate to 40 million people in the state of California to all do the right thing and the vast majority comply and achieve that.

And avoid what would have been potentially catastrophic and that has not happened in other countries and other places around our country unfortunately. And so now it gets more complicated and more complex as to what to do next. And it's really encouraging to hear that those conversations are happening at the state level, they're happening with your colleagues around Southern California, it's happening here in our county as well. But there isn't a simple answer about when can people go back to work? That depends on our ability At the national level to have the testing capability, to make sure that we understand how many people have the virus. That is that fundamental basic question that needs to be answered to get to the next questions is not known at this point and all of these things are hard for folks to understand and it's hard for me to understand and I'm sure my colleagues feel the same way.

And we're doing the best we can on a daily basis, working really hard. And I think the public understands that and appreciates that and is willing to do the best they can to cooperate together and address this issue. So thank you for the information, and we will have more tomorrow. Thank you. Supervisor

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction45:02 · ≈ 9:45 AM

Williams? You know, I was inspired by what you just said One of my observations is how powerful this proves collective action really is. This flattening of the curve that those graphs would indicate we as a community have been successful in doing, is only started by government. It's not actually executed by government. Fortunately, in this society, Enough coercive power in government to actually force you to do this, right?

People are staying at home because they have chosen to stay at home. Because they have chosen to adhere to the stay-at-home order and to me that's a tremendously powerful testament to people's ability to collectively act in the community's benefit. Because they are collectively acting in the community's benefit, even though in many cases it is causing them to lose their job or lose their business.

They are still taking that strong community action and that has saved lives. So to me, that should be a real cause of That it's inspirational that it doesn't take the course of power of government to do that as in other countries. It takes us acting collectively for the public good to accomplish that.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role46:37 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Williams. I'll now entertain a motion that we have A, B and C received file and the standard CEQA declaration. Is there a motion? So moved. Motion's been made and seconded, roll call please.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role46:56 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Mr. Adam?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8646:58 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Here.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role46:59 · ≈ 9:46 AM

Mr. Labanino?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:00 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:02 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Mr Williams? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:07 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:07 · ≈ 9:47 AM

motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role47:09 · ≈ 9:47 AM

thank you again for the presentation this takes us now to the scheduled agenda for fiscal year 2020-2021 budget workshops as a reminder There is an opportunity for public comment that will be provided at the conclusion of the general overview and after each functional group presentation, and each special issue. So there's multiple times throughout the day that folks can comment. We want to hear your input, and the clerk will repeatedly give you the access points to that as we go through the day's presentation. But now I'll turn over the presentation to County Executive Officer Miyasato.

0:47 – 0:511 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed47:51 · ≈ 9:47 AM

Thank you, Chair Hart and board members. Good morning. You know as we start these budget workshops it's an understatement to say we're in uncharted territory. We all know that but I want us to remind everyone that we're one of 58 counties in one state of 50 states among hundreds of countries going through this so if anything there is comfort in that there is connection among all of us as we are going through this.

And it's irrational to say that we can continue business as usual, but yet we're trying to the extent that we can because society and our residents rely on the continuity of government in order for essential services to function. So that's why we are here today. So just a little bit about the purpose of the workshops and just to let you know your department heads are all online watching with an ability to participate should there be any questions So just again, the purpose of these workshops and to preface this.

The information provided you today was developed prior to the COVID-19 health emergency and generally presents a status quo budget. So today we're giving an overview of that preliminary information. We'll talk about the impacts of the pandemic in the months ahead. We'll give summaries of the department's budgets and their work efforts which have been provided to you online and in your book receive input and take any direction that you may want to offer at this time.

And so here's the agenda for today. I'm going to be setting the context, and then Jeff Rappwell, Assistant CEO and our Budget Director will be talking about trends in revenue and expenditures. Talking about the things we talk about every year which is our fiscal issues, maintenance funding, cannabis tax revenues. He and Paul Clemente will go over the functional groups. And then we have two special issues for you at the end of the day. One is on libraries and the planning and development long range work program that you asked for follow up to be presented, and then just some closing comments about looking forward.

So setting the context. The discussion you just had was pointing to the issue about when can we restart the economy? And we know that there are negative shocks to our economy in many Uncertainties and unknowns. And people talk about a recession, but what we really are is in a state of economic paralysis with the shutdown. Before that, California was actually growing at a modest pace and expected to grow at a modest pace for 2021. The state's budget was in pretty good shape as we know the governor in his January budget had talked about some program expansions.

So we know that there has been a sharp drop in economic activity and a lot of volatility in financial markets. And it's important to remember that our economy is made up relying upon consumer spending, which makes up about 70% of the U.S. economy, and that is expected to decline. And the truth is no one really knows. There are many unknowns related to it and a wide range of potential outcomes. My office has reviewed many economic forecasts in the last few weeks, and there are varied opinions and predictions But again, people just don't know and it depends on where the course of the virus will take us.

But we have been evaluating them and looking at them for the demonstration of trends not necessarily for the accuracy of dates. So again, we're looking at these models for a demonstration of trends not necessarily accuracy of dates. And AJ Kinubeva is an analyst in my office he's been with the county for nine years. He just finished his master's degree from the Anderson School of Management Business.

And he's going to present the next few slides on the evolving economic outlook. AJ.

0:51 – 1:053 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed51:40 · ≈ 9:51 AM

Thank you. The UCLA Anderson forecast released its economic outlook shortly after Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency and then also before this safe at home order was issued. On Friday, the UCLA Anderson forecast updated its forecast And then also downgraded its economic outlook. So the information presented on this slide does not reflect the most recent information provided by the forecast, however you may note that beginning this quarter and at least lasting through the end of September The forecast shows a two quarter recession, showing a drop in GDP of about 6.5%. The revised forecast shows a steeper drop of about 7.5%, continuing into next quarter dropping by about 3.2%.

The forecast anticipates that California, due to its exposure to tourism and Pacific transportation will be more severely impacted by the recession. And implicit in this forecast as well as in the revised forecast is a continued assumption that the abatement of As well as the accompanying safer at home orders will abate this summer. Any extension of the safer at home order and or the inability to address the virus would extend the recessionary impacts on our economy.

Unemployment is, the unemployment rate is expected to peak at more than 16% in California with approximately 2.2 million jobs lost and unemployment sorry employment in California will not return to previous peak levels until late 2020 As the shutdown has focused on services that are delivered person to person, we expect to see steep drops in leisure and hospitality. And because of tourism as well as transpacific transportation where housing utilities are also expected to be acutely affected.

So according to the last outlook, one third of jobs lost will be in the leisure and hospitality and transportation and warehousing sectors. Two of California's largest revenue sources, personal income tax and sales tax will be affected by any economic downturn. And funding from the federal and state government primarily for health and human services usually form the largest sources of county revenues.

Property taxes and sales taxes are the primary funding sources for many county services that do not have a dedicated state and federal funding source. And consumption of the sales tax revenue would be sensitive to a downturn. Earlier outlooks showed 2021 to be a recovery year and 2022 to be year of growth. However, due to the latest update in the outlook this is expected to be pushed later into late 2022. Thank

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed55:33 · ≈ 9:55 AM

you AJ. So the slides AJ presented obviously are forecast we don't know but it shows a trend and it's important to note this is for the state of California. And why is that important to us? It's because as everyone knows For California counties, a large portion of our revenues are from the state and federal government. So almost 40%. So when the state's revenues especially from personal income are reduced that will certainly affect the county.

So looking at what else is going to affect the county, obviously we talked about TOT, transient occupancy tax, sales tax. And what's important to notice for sales tax, we get the Bradley Burns 1% sales tax and that's what we report as part of our discretionary general fund. In addition, sales taxes is collected by the state and redistributed to the counties for realignment from 1991 realignment in 2011 realignment.

And Prop 172. Those are significant resources for the county and so we will likely see a drop in those. In addition, gas tax just if people are driving less we expect that we will see reduction in gas taxes that we get through SB 1. Other revenues at risk of decline or interest income and also departments collect revenues based on reimbursements and also fee-based revenues. So for example if there reduced people coming to our parks. That would reduce their fees as well.

The one thing to note is that cannabis tax revenues are not expected to decline, and I've talked to some of my colleagues in other counties and cities, and they're all seeing the same thing. They do not expect cannabis tax revenues to have any major reduction so that isn't going to be helping our budget and we'll talk about that a little bit later. This chart is just to show our property tax revenue trends Doesn't show projections into the future, but our trends. And as you know we, as a county, we rely heavily on our property tax revenues. It makes up the bulk of our discretionary general fund revenues and so what this chart shows is in the red are the last recessions that we've had beginning in 1990-91. The middle one was the dot com crash and then the great recession with the housing market crash.

And this is just to show that We are fortunate in Santa Barbara County that we never had, even in the housing market crash, negative growth. This is year after year percentage change growth and our secured role. So we're fortunate in that sense. Other counties had negative growth so overall we did not but we did have less than 1% during the Great Recession. And as you've seen in the last few years, we've come back to a 4-5% growth which has helped us and helped us fund many of the additional services or enhancements Or commitments that we've made.

What Mr. Quineva showed was that in the economic outlook, what we're seeing is most people are saying it's likely a V-shaped recession so it's going to sharply decline which we see now but hopefully there will be a sharp incline back up. It may take a few years to get there but it will not likely be sustained in the way that the Great Recession was although the impacts certainly will be and could be more significant initially.

This chart is just to show you that what we presented in November of 2019 when we provided the board with our forecast and our fiscal issues report. And what it showed at the time was, we believed that the 2021 year would be balanced and we would actually have a little bit of additional revenue, and that we wouldn't potentially face issues until 21-22. And if you look obviously for the mild recession or deep recession, it could've been up to $9.7 million in 21- 22.

Obviously, this has all changed. And if anything it's accelerated a recession obviously to the county in our budget and that's what we'll be tackling in the next few months. So what is our strategy going forward? Our strategy is to ensure continuity of government and reduce impacts to our community and employees. I was just reading something from the World Bank and also from other sources One is from a fellow named Brian Moynihan, the chair of the World Economic Forum. And he said our goal should be to focus on employees and customers and the goal should be to keep them healthy and keep them employed, keep them mentally healthy as well. And that's what we'll try to do and continue to do for our employees and also for our customers.

To maintain status quo budgets for departments to the extent possible, and that's what's provided to you today. We will return in the fall for mid-year reductions if they are required once we know more information. During this time we'll be asking departments to evaluate their services and also we have the assessments from KPMG for those departments that have already been reviewed. And those reviews are continuing to help us become leaner and more efficient.

We've also set aside funds that we had on hand now, that were carry over from last year into reserves. And we will hope that will help mitigate impacts next year and use funds to backfill potential revenue losses. We're asking that we defer major initiatives and at this time refrain from granting any budget expansions. And I just want to hold here because a couple of times through the year there's been lots of requests of the board that have come up at mid-year And we said, let's hold off until budget time to either expend additional cannabis revenue or urine savings. And your board did that and I just want to say kudos to the board and thank you again to the board because those are the funds we will be using to backfill services next year to reduce reduction to our staffing in our services to the extent possible.

This slide is to show you that you have made great commitments over the last decade and we're continuing to fund those commitments And starting from the 2011 with the Northern Branch Jail Operating Funding Plan, which continues. 2012, shifting more property taxes to the fire department to ensure a strong and well staffed fire department. We funded plans to take care of liabilities in our work comp and our retiree health plan.

The board began the 18% deferred maintenance policy. And in 2016, the strategic reserve was fully funded and we fell below the target in 2017 and 2018 due to the Thomas Fire and debris flow. In 2020, we are asking to increase this strategic reserve fund not to hold back money so that we have funds next fiscal year to help with some of the deficits we expect to see.

Looking ahead, we know there's continuing fiscal pressures. There's going to be three types of losses that we'll experience. One is actual revenue loss due to decreased economic activity, and we talked about that in reduction of transient occupancy tax and sales tax. Another is the direct and indirect costs associated with response activities. And the last is direct cost impacts related to increasing demand for some of our safety net services.

We will present a recommended budget to you in June, and at that time we recognize we may not have all information or full information about what is to come. And so we are hoping the state and federal government will assist with some backfill. I know the CARES Act that the federal government passed has assisted governments that are larger than 500,000 people. We missed that mark but I know Congress is working on other packages to assist local government. So we're hoping get some of that, but obviously we're planning for the eventuality if we don't. We'll return to the board with mid-fiscal year budget adjustments that may contain service level reductions if necessary, but will continue on essential response and recovery services.

So the key challenges as we look We continue to face existing challenges we brought before you and the public time and Our changing mandates, increasing and keeping up our technology which has been tested particularly now in this response. Our deferred maintenance assisting those with mental illness and homeless. So as we know that this presents an unprecedented challenge for the county and for the state and for the nation but we and your board continue to adhere to responsible practices that we've had in place.

And that is to use one time funds for one time uses, to allocate cannabis tax revenue after enforcement to one time uses only or next year to support core services in the event of revenue shortfalls. To set aside funding for high priority initiatives and continue your board's commitments and to continue implementing efficiencies and process improvements. Our aim is to provide relief and recovery but also position the county for long term success.

And we've been talking about Renew 22 as a way to transform how we do our business and I think what we're seeing today is that this is not a may-do but a must-do. And with that, I'm going to hand it over to Jeff Rapwell to give you more detail on the preliminary budget.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈26s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:05:30 · ≈ 10:05 AM

Thank you Ms. Miyasato

1:05 – 1:173 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:05:44 · ≈ 10:05 AM

Good morning Mr. Chair,

CommentAs MrProposed1:05:45 · ≈ 10:05 AM

members of the board. So as we look at the preliminary budget as it sits today up on the screen is our timeline and it's our typical timeline in which November we bring to your board what we're seeing as a five-year forecast as well as identify fiscal issues that are on the financial horizon that need to be addressed. In December each year we bring before your board budget development guidelines. Your board adopted those mid-December And that really begins the budget development process with working with the departments and the county executive office.

Those budgets are due from departments, requested budgets are due from departments on February 1st of this year. And between that February 1st and that mid-March we were working hard with them to understand the details of their budget request, understanding their need for additional resources, understanding any potential service level impacts that those budgets would have All for the purpose of getting to this point of the workshops.

We had what's indicated on here, an interceptor. We had the pandemic that was thrust upon us and that has kind of thrown us a curve ball. And so the numbers I'm going to present you today as CEO Minnesota mentioned are really numbers that were developed pre-COVID. And really our challenge between now and putting the recommended budget together and ultimately presenting that to your board in June, is really to put a fine point on where we see those estimate impacts are both on the revenue side as well as expense side. And so that's really our challenge and we'll talk a little bit about that but I thought today it's important to kind of go over the numbers that we have in the preliminary budget to set kind of some context of where we would start from.

And so I'll do that for you today. The preliminary budget, as I mentioned, was really built on revenue costs prior to understanding the impact of COVID. And that's something we're continuing to grapple with each day. We're getting more and more information that helps us form our opinion with respect to those costs going forward and revenue impacts going forward. We have made no commitment to ongoing discretionary dollars going to new or expanded services in this preliminary budget.

Likewise, our focus really has been to continue the essential services in response and recovery to this disaster. And it does at this point continue to fully fund your board's commitments with respect to Northern Branch Jail Operating Fund for 18% deferred maintenance funding, the fire tax shift, and to fully fund the county strategic reserve. In large you could say that a preliminary budget The department budgets are at a status quo for service level, for the most part.

So our strategies we've already incorporated in the preliminary budget are the buildup of the allocation of current year revenues or current revenues we have on hand that were carried forward from fiscal year 18-19 As we work to put the recommended budget together, we will continue to work with departments And hopefully put some clarity with respect to the COVID-19 impacts.

And so that's our challenge, as I mentioned. And also it's our assumption that as we build a recommended budget, we are going to have to rely on the one source of revenue that is growing which is the cannabis tax revenue to backfill some of the losses in the Prop 172, 1991 and 2011 realignment revenues. After we adopt the budget in June, hopefully we will prepare for, as CEO mentioned, potential mid-year service level reductions should they become necessary and work with departments to put contingency plans together so that we're prepared in case that comes to pass.

Specifically regarding COVID-19, I have three slides basically to kind of walk you through what we're seeing as far as budgetary impacts And as CEO Miyasato mentioned, there are categories of budgetary impacts with respect to this pandemic. First is the impacts to our revenues. I put up on the screen a number of economically sensitive revenues that are susceptible, we know will have impact in. The sales tax, TOT tax, unsecured property tax and interest income are all revenues that are collected as part of the county's what we call discretionary revenue. And those go to fund and they get allocated out to departments across the board.

The Prop 172, which is the abortion sales tax collected at the state level that's allocated back down to counties to largely fund public safety departments will be impacted. And we know the 1991 and 2011 realignment, which is also sales-tax based that flows through the state back to the counties will be impacted as well. The 1991 realignments largely fund three categories.

mental health, social services and public health. The 2011 realignment largely funds Public Safety Departments so you'll see that in this case Prop 172 and 2000 realignment is a double hit really to our Public Safety Departments. Gas tax and I could add Measure A also impact specific departments largely transportation within the Public Works Department We're also concerned about the impacts to the Mental Health Services Act, MHSA revenues. If you recall these are largely referred to as millionaire tax obviously as this situation has impact on in-person income as we looked at the model from the Anderson group.

will impact likely personal income tax revenues to the state. So those MHSA revenues flow from the state to the counties, so we're concerned about that. And also finally and not insignificantly to the departments are impacted there are some department revenues that are specifically collected by those departments such as camping fees or plan permit fees or environmental health type of fees that we'll be looking at between now and recommended budget to evaluate the potential impact on those revenues.

So what are our strategies? Fortunately, we anticipate growth in cannabis revenues which will likely be needed to backfill for these discretionary realignment and Prop 172 revenue losses. We will obviously evaluate and have to rely on a strategic use or prudent use of our strategic reserve and contingencies Also to help as a short-term solution mitigate some potential service level impacts.

Thirdly, we'll continue to aggressively seek federal and state financial assistance and this is something that we're monitoring on a daily basis. That landscape I think changes in that regular cadence. And so it's something that we're continuing to watch and to push and to seek support from both the state and the federal government. We'll be developing budget contingency plans with departments should mid-year budget reductions be required.

And we'll be refreshing our fiscal budget forecast model to look at and model different lengths of recessionary and different depths of recessionary pressures that we'll have. So those are all things that will be doing a strategy for losing those revenues. On the expense side, our expense sides kind of fall in two categories as well. And you'll see that we have our response activities, so our emergency operations center, our temporary shelter and accommodations. Our joint information center, procurement of medical and PPE as well as preparing for the potential for alternate care sites and medical beds should our hospital system be overrun.

So those are all kind of costs associated with activities. We also have a potential, what we see during any kind of situation in economic downturn time is actually increased demand services for the county. So counties are in that unfortunate position where when the economy's good and there's some revenue, we actually hope to see a decline in the need for certain social services and certain county programs but when the reverse happens it's double hit for us. We lose revenues and we have increased demand for services So potentially with respect to this COVID situation, we have increased demand for medical related services. Our human services and safety net services are being impacted and there's the cost of assisting the public and accommodating social distancing in the delivery our services has had a minor budgetary impact as well.

Turning to the preliminary budget as it currently is developing again these air These are revenues that we were seeing prior to the COVID, but we had seen some modest and good growth with respect to our different operating revenues. And this is consistent largely with what we had a forecast in November. Some of these are slightly even improved from that time. Let me walk you through a couple of them.

So our total operating revenues were projected to increase by 5.2%. Our general fund, if you just isolate general fund operating revenues about 3% are pretty flat. Discretionary general revenue is 10.2% growth. Property tax revenue is 5.1%. Our TOT 7.9% increase and finally our sales of 3.1. I'll walk through each one of these quickly for you to give you a five year trend and some percentage increases over time.

So here you can look at the county's total operating revenues. And so we're going from, and this is a five year trend. So for fiscal year 16-17, we'd adopt the budget that was just over $1 billion. First time it had been over $1 billion. And it grew, expected to grow into the 2021 year to $1.2 billion. You can see the percentage growth year over year indicated on the bar there or in that line as part of the bars. So at 5.2% growth projected pre COVID.

In our total operating revenues. Looking at just the general fund, you'll see that our general

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:17:15 · ≈ 10:17 AM

fund- Can I interrupt there for just a second? Sure, Supervisor Atkins. Could we go back a slide please? Thank you. Could we go back a slide please?

1:17 – 1:348 turns

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction1:17:28 · ≈ 10:17 AM

Okay so what are you thinking at this point and Speculative because we just don't, don't know what you're going to cut that. But I mean that 5.2's been erased at this point right? Is that a safe assumption?

CommentAs MrProposed1:17:53 · ≈ 10:17 AM

Supervisor Adam through the chair, I think all of these numbers are subject to change and Potentially with the exception of the property tax revenues. Property tax revenues, I don't expect we'll see an immediate impact on from as a result of the pandemic. I do think there is some potentially softening going forward but that will begin in the following fiscal year. But the rest of these numbers, the rest of these five numbers on this chart, I think you will see. In fact, you will see some instead of green up arrows, you'll see red down arrows by time we are sitting here During the record, the budget hearings.

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction1:18:36 · ≈ 10:18 AM

In June yeah okay alright thank you.

CommentAs MrProposed1:18:45 · ≈ 10:18 AM

Looking at just the general fund operating revenues, you'll see those are going from 386 million to 450 is what we projected this a little and this chart bears some explanation in that what we're seeing here it only reflects 0.3% growth in general fund operating revenues. Part of this, the majority of this is really a reflection as part of the upcoming budget consistent with your board's budget development policies adopted in December removing three funds, three functions out of the general fund into their own special operating funds and so that really is the explanation of why the remaining general fund is only growing by 3%.

In the current fiscal year, fiscal year 19-20 those three functions are in that $449.1 million that are not in the bar for fiscal year 2021. Focus on just discretionary revenue now you'll see those have been projected to grow to $304.1 million a 10.2% increase and again this will be sharply different when we're reaching budget hearings Looking at property tax, I do think this is probably the one part of our discretionary revenue that I don't expect to see major impact on. And you'll see that's growing by about 5.1% for the next fiscal year.

Looking at our TOT and sales tax, this is where I think you'll see dramatic change between now and budget hearings. But you'll see that in the solid bars, that is our sales tax revenue projected. The lined bars or the hash, the bars are in hash mark as our TOT. Our TOT had been expected to grow from 13.2 million adopted in the current fiscal year to 14.3 million.

And this is based on all the trends and what we're seeing in the current fiscal year. Obviously, with the COVID pandemic, we're seeing a sharp decline. The question of course is how long will these major hotels be closed? And at what rate will they regain once social distancing is lifted? Just a one quick slide on expenditures. It's obviously the major driver in the county's budget is personnel costs and you'll see that for our preliminary budget, the average cost per employee is about $153,000. We have about 4300 FTE.

In the county, and that number of 153.5 thousand is going up by 2.6% from the current fiscal year. We turn our attention to cannabis specifically. The allocation of cannabis as you can see in this chart is really broken down into three categories again. This is just a tax revenue, not the permit and licensing revenue. It's just the tax revenue. It's three categories. So we have our enforcement costs, which by board policy comes essentially off the top that was adopted in the current fiscal year about 2.8 million and it's growing to closer to 3 million, 2.97 million in the preliminary budget The second category is tax collection and program administration costs. You can see that's projected growth from $329,000 in the current fiscal year to $480,000.

That's largely with respect to both software usage as well as the auditing function and You can see that Treasury tax collector $124,000 is next year rather than $165,000 in the current year. And our third category is really cannabis tax revenues that are allocated by your board to one-time purposes. I want to draw your attention—this is important in our presentation this morning—is to talk about And you can see there and what was adopted by your board in 1920, the current fiscal year.

But the last three lines on here I want to bring your attention to specifically is what our current thinking of the need to set aside a portion of these revenues 3 million with respect to help cover some of the upfront costs of the COVID response. Some of this I think eventually we may get reimbursed from federal state resources but At the moment, there's a need to front that response cost. And we're estimating at 3 million and the use of about 7 million with respect to discretionary revenue loss backfill and then the allocation of 18% to the maintenance policy.

Wrapped up in this last slide just kind of summarized with respect to our revenue estimates. So our revenue estimate in the current fiscal year $5.6 million. We think we'll probably end up about 9.2, this month will be very telling. This month is the collection for the quarter ending in March and we're projecting currently about 10.6 in the upcoming fiscal year.

In addition to that 10. 6 there's 4.8 that's carry over from prior years and the slides above with respect to allocation Those revenues are about 14.3, leaving about at this moment 1.1 that's not otherwise earmarked or utilized for their previous uses. There are four expansion requests for the use of cannabis tax revenue that have been requested by departments, the DA, the Sheriff, the CEO as well as the Treasurer Tax Collector. You can see those numbers outlined here on the screen. Those total about $1.8 million.

If I can turn our attention then to, on these next two slides really talking about dedication and resources to the maintenance of our facilities and roads. You can see back here's the 2014, that's when your board adopted 18% funding policy effective for the 15-16 year I think. And here you can see basically The allocation of those resources, you can see that the blue bars which represent back in 2014 what the projection had been of increased funding toward the deferred maintenance.

The green bars adjacent to them is what the board actually adopted in fiscal year 16-17 through 19-20 and then projected for 2021 And the blue bars have two pieces, which is the ongoing GFC dedicated to deferred maintenance as well as the projected use of one-time monies. The green bars is what has been adopted, as I mentioned. So again solid green being the allocation of ongoing discretionary general fund dollars.

In 16-17 being the amount of one time general fund dollars. And then beginning in 2017-18 through 2019-20 are the green, there's two, it's hard to see on the screen but I hope you can see better on your printed charts. There are two components of the hash right? They're looking at 17-18. There is 3.3 of ongoing GFC, 3.1 of one time GFC and this is 2.8 is with the passage of SB 1, revenues coming directly for road maintenance and you'll see that in the ensuing years as well.

If we look more globally at maintenance funding as a whole not just this is beyond just 18% but rolling that up into The allocation of general fund dollars toward maintenance of roads and facilities projects. We have a baseline funding adopted by board policy each year, $2.3 million divided between public works, general services and parks. You'll see there the allocation of the 18% policy as your second line.

The preliminary budget as it currently sits, which is subject to now review again, is the allocation of about $1.7 million for prioritized projects through the CIP process and you can see that top three are largely replacement and preservation of our building infrastructure. And the last item there, the new Quiama Sheriff Substation, is really just allocation of funding You recall that as the fire department's, one of their projects is to replace the Cuyama Fire Station. As part of that project we're going to add some square footage onto the facility to accommodate the sheriff so there's a need for and that's a general fund expense for the sheriff. There's a need to include in the budget some amount of money for that portion of that project.

So that's the 750. You can tell that one project on this floor is not like the others. That's why I want to walk through again, just kind of update in November when we bring our forecast. We also bring our fiscal issues to your board and I'd like to talk a little bit over these next three slides of how we've accommodated or address those fiscal issues in the preliminary budget and they really fall on three categories.

The category, the first category which I'll talk about these are addressed in the preliminary budget. The second category being those that departments have submitted as expansion requests. And I'll talk about those in a moment And then the final are a couple issues that have not yet been addressed and may need to be deferred to a future fiscal year. So, the first category those that are addressed in the preliminary budget we talked about deferred maintenance, we talked about the we have public safety radio communication system that was identified to your board and we've been talking to your board several times over the last year and a half Now, we expect that project cost to come in at about $45 million.

And what we've done in the preliminary budget is set aside a debt service to address the debt service on that project. We'll bring a more complete report to your board on that project when we get bids in which are expected in the next two months. So we'll have that before hearings. We also have identified in the fiscal issues for the escalating cost of both general liability and workers' comp.

You can see combined, that's about $2.9 million that has been addressed in the preliminary budget. We got some kind of bad news a while back that we actually think our general liability will be even higher than 2.2 so that's something we'll be working through between now and the recommended budget. And finally on this sheet is the conversion of the county fleet to electric vehicles. That was addressed by your board mid-year, and so that's already been addressed in the current fiscal year and that ongoing process is incorporated into preliminary budget as well for next year.

Our second category of fiscal issues were those that were submitted as expansion requests by departments. There we are. At this point, we haven't recommended expansion requests be granted given our fiscal uncertainty. But it's something we'll be looking at between now and recommended budget as well. Our last category are those that have not yet been addressed either as expansion requests or in the preliminary budget. And those consist of the records management system for the sheriff. The risk we have with respect to what we refer to as 340B prescription revenues that come Thank you, Mr. President and members of the public. I want to start by saying thank you very much for your support of the governor's January budget. The governor is going back and doing a complete scrub of That bill remains active but not yet passed, to my knowledge.

With that I would stop and respond to any questions that your board might have and then we can launch into functional groups.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:32:22 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Thank you Mr.

CommentAs MrProposed1:32:23 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Epwell.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:32:24 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Supervisor Williams?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction1:32:26 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Well, I just wanted to indicate one thing. I think that's just a little bit of just a slight oversight because of the way in which we allocated marijuana tax revenue. So if staff is proposing to use marijuana tax revenue to try to maintain our budgets, I support that goal. I just think that it should be in this case across The general fund and not leave out somebody. And somebody was left out, which is libraries and the reason why it was left out is simply because we have been allocating that on a one time basis each year.

And so if we are going to protect status quo funding for each department, that means that some of that would have to go to libraries as well. So just that in just indication and That what's listed as an expansion request, but it's not really all an expansion request. Because we've been allocating on a one time basis part of that is simply the amount necessary to maintain current levels of funding and I consider that particularly needed in order to encourage. What our policy has been is just essentially make sure that cities have to maintain their funding.

Because we're maintaining our funding, right? It's a kind of, what do they used to call it? Mutual assured destruction was the term in the 80s. Well, the only way that we can ensure cities to continue their funding is by us to maintain our funding. So I hope that in the June budget staff considers that as part of maintaining ongoing funding. And then the second thing is just an apology. I'm our voting member for Monterey Bay Community Power, they have a meeting right now that has to do with rates.

So it's not a meeting that I should skip out on voting on, so I will be popping in the other room a lot. And it's not just to get something to eat. In this case, it'll be to vote. Thank

1:34 – 1:408 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:34:46 · ≈ 10:34 AM

you, Supervisor Williams. Any other questions from board members? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:34:52 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Thank you. I just had a procedural question trying to be clear about what we're doing today, what we're doing in June and then what we might be preparing for mid-year, I assume December. So today is largely a presentation assuming kind of business as usual And we'll be tracking, and we have to put a budget together by law. And so you'll be putting that together in May and we'll be looking at it in June. So I'd like you to talk a little bit more about what we'll do in June because we normally use this process as one to have a robust discussion about our priorities.

And then that gets incorporated, but that's not exactly what we're going to do today. And then December would be mid-year and mid-fiscal year in other words and so in June do we want to put things in place that would happen automatically in December if there are certain triggers? Where we're voting with just a majority or do we want to wait? We have a novel situation and I just want to understand how that affects our process of deliberations here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:12 · ≈ 10:36 AM

Supervisors through the chair, those are all good questions and those are questions we've been trying to define for ourselves. So I think we will come back. We have to put the budget together. The book will be done in May for your board's consideration of the June hearings and we will provide at that time with the hearings any further information That we have, that may influence obviously the status quo budget. As Mr. Frapwell said, we may or may not have more information but what we have included in the preliminary budget are ways to help mitigate that by putting funding aside and I think we're expressing our intent that we intend to use the cannabis revenue and set aside for For holdbacks should we need to do that. So I think in June, any new information that will affect these numbers will be presenting to your board.

You can express your priorities at this meeting. You can express your priorities in June. We know that we won't have full information and we won't know really if the stay-at-home orders have been lifted and probably as we get closer to June or maybe not until after June. Further actions, I was saying fall because we're going to have to continue to provide information to you working with our departments before we get to that trigger point. You could in the June hearings tell us if these certain conditions actually materialize then go yes pull the trigger on these things or yes go ahead and fund these things because we're not going to know with certainty until we get probably past June.

I think those are all possibilities, and I think we'll just have more clarity on the process. But we know it will come back to you in June for decisions and then come back to you in the fall or the winter.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:37:56 · ≈ 10:37 AM

And just a follow-on if it did come in the fall then we would require four votes rather than three is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:04 · ≈ 10:38 AM

For any appropriation of funding for the June hearings therefore we could prove we are working with on how Figure out ways, if the board expresses intent and we want to go do things that we believe we do have the revenue. We could put it in the budget but with triggers of not spending so there are different ways that we could do that. We would have to make sure that we do believe that the revenue would be there to do that though.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:38:29 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Any questions from our colleagues in Santa Maria? Yeah

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:38:33 · ≈ 10:38 AM

this is Supervisor Levin. I think Supervisor Hartman brings up a really good point because And I think it's just incumbent upon staff to come up with a way that, and with county council's concurrence of how we, because it seems like the strategy which I think is a good one. Is to stash cash and then deal with things as they develop and we deal with this later on in the year but A problem with either a simple majority or four-fifths, so I just think there's got to be a creative way to make that happen. So I'd just encourage that. My question is about cannabis tax revenue and I have no problem with obviously we're in a crazy year and we need to do something different.

I really support cannabis tax revenue because we're not sure how long it will last. It just has a lot of uncertainties to it, so I really prefer one time but I understand in this situation. So my question is whether or not that we are changing our policy or we're suspending the policy for this year? So that next year we go back into a policy that is for one-time spending only.

CommentAs MrProposed1:39:57 · ≈ 10:39 AM

Supervisor Lafrenier, Chair. Let me give you a yes answer to that and here's why. I would hope that the loss of these revenues both realignment and 172 sales tax is a temporary and so that we will see some restoration of that in the future fiscal years. So in essence what we're trying to do or recommending is the use of cannabis It's still as a one time as a backfill. I'm hoping that is not required going forward to support ongoing services, so I think we can still adhere to the intent of your board's policy with that kind of explanation if that helps.

1:40 – 1:5015 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:40:42 · ≈ 10:40 AM

It does. And I'd also, I guess you guys are probably all waiting for me to say this but it is now I think on par with sales tax what cannabis is projected to bring in next year. Probably will pass sales tax and it is approaching the levels of the TOT so I think it's an important part of a three legged stool now that we have with sales tax, TOT tax and now the cannabis revenue.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:41:14 · ≈ 10:41 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Lavenino. Mr. Gazzone, you had a comment?

CommentDebt ServiceProposed · by introduction1:41:18 · ≈ 10:41 AM

Well I just want to join in with the CEO and budget director on how this works under the Budget Act. And I agree with what's been said. The starting point is that funding sources must equal the financing uses. There is a pretty detailed process in the Budget Act about estimating funding sources' uses. And then the timeline of how to go forward. And then as we've discussed, what happens after the board actually adopts the resolution which is the final action in the budget cycle and then anything after that is a forfeits vote but we have talked about ways and in prior years what these estimates are based on and will work more with the Budget Director and CEO on that. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:42:02 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Supervisor Adam did you have a

CommentDebt ServiceProposed · by introduction1:42:03 · ≈ 10:42 AM

question?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction1:42:05 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Yeah I was just really commenting I think there was kind of an unfortunate statement in the board letter that got contradicted elsewhere. That we were going to try to maintain current Staffing levels and I'm not looking at that deal. But anyway, it was about maintaining current funding levels of most of our services and Major initiatives, something like that.

I think it was on page three of the board letter and then of course later we're talking about deferring major initiatives so I don't know which ones that is maybe there's some kind of nuance in that seeming contradiction but I don't know The second thing is on the property tax slide I see the number of personal and corporate bankruptcies that are likely to occur from this shutdown. And the longer it goes, the deeper it goes.

Problems people are going to have collecting rents affecting their valuations of different residential properties especially and uncertainty of people who do have means to purchase. property values and therefore property tax revenues will slide precipitously. And I'm told that hotel owners will be starting to ask for reassessments pretty quick, so I would say that any security that we feel in that property tax column could be overstated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:44:08 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Supervisor Adam for the chair, thank you for pointing that out in the letter. I think what we meant to say was any new major initiatives should be deferred unless the board directs. We continue to continue to fund the major initiatives the board has directed us in the past which is as Mr. Frackwell and I said funding the northern branch jail operations maintenance fire tax shift and strategic reserve so we continue to do that unless the board gives us other direction but it meant deferring any major new initiatives And also if we got sloppy in our writing, I apologize. But our intent is to maintain the level of service to the extent possible and we've tried to put that everywhere where we could in a letter or the PowerPoint to the extent possible.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:44:52 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Supervisor Williams?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction1:44:54 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Well, I would just also suggest one more lens to look at this at I think given the amount of time, this is a good lens of sort of how do we protect the status quo. But I think we should also be looking at through the lens of how can we minimize damage to our constituents and One in the same, in many ways. And so to me, initiatives that would produce more revenue or produce more jobs we should look at a little bit differently.

And I also would remark that in some areas of the county as a structure, People who would be laid off if we were not able to maintain a status quo budget would be in a different kind of position than others. Meaning, there's some departments we have where people would be, if they were laid off, they would go from being a staffer to being a client of the county, i.e., relying on us for public assistance, right? That would be an example A really large impact on our constituents and society as well if we get into a situation where because we had to shed employees, they instead became welfare recipients. So I do think that when we are looking at holding the status quo, we particularly pay attention We have employment in sectors where those folks would be otherwise in a much worse situation.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:46:53 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Any other questions? We have public comments, I think we have four people ready to communicate on this portion of the budget.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:47:01 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board, we have four requests to speak on this item. We have two letters to be read in the record. We will begin with Renee O'Neill to be followed by Joe Armadaris then we will take to We have two callers, the first will be Andy Caldwell to be followed by Erica Goodfellow. And I will begin with Renee O'Neill. Dear Chair Hart and supervisors, I hope this letter finds you and your loved ones well and that you are staying safe from the effects of COVID-19 virus. During these uncertain times, I want to express my concerns regarding the following budget considerations. One, please support the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program, AOT. As this pilot program will save the county much needed revenue in the future.

It will reduce the number of incarcerations taking the burden off our prison system and costly psychiatric hospitalizations. To please continue to fund an increased staff for planning and development, and the Sheriff's Cannabis Enforcement Team. There is an urgent need for additional staff to address and enforce on increasing number of illicit non-compliant cannabis industry operations. We the people appreciate the ongoing efforts these important agencies are accomplishing. We are still awaiting enforcement action on non-compliant growers in Tepeskay community who continue to disregard county, state and federal regulations and have multiple violations on their records and are still operating.

Three, as a long time fire associate and advocate for the community of Tepeskay I urge to support Santa Barbara County Fire and our firefighters' ongoing efforts to protect and defend our rural interface communities from wildland fires. They are essential to our county. Respectfully submitted, Renee O'Neill

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:48:37 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Thank you, Ms. O'Neill.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:48:39 · ≈ 10:48 AM

We will now go to a letter from Joe Armendariz and then we will go on the phone with Andy Caldwell. Good morning members of the board. The Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association believes it is essential that when the state decides to end the lockdown of the economy, our local government should commit to examining the local rules and regulations governing our local permitting and approval process. When businesses find themselves unable to reopen their doors because their business model didn't anticipate or allow for the forced closing of their business by external forces over which they had no influence or control, hundreds maybe several hundred new businesses will emerge to replace them Some will do so very quickly. Those of you who are responsible for leading our county need to anticipate this inevitably and start planning now for it, saving time is vital, time is money after all.

And no entity needs money more right now than the county, so your actions and decisions should demonstrate that. If we've learned anything over these past several weeks, it is that the private sector Is nimble and agile. A business model can turn on a dime with the right set of incentives. New business ventures will come knocking on the doors of local government with applications for the necessary permits to open or reopen, expand and ultimately operate. The answer should be yes and absolutely. The attitude should be how can we help? Our local governments must treat our local businesses fairly when this crisis finally ends. And there's no better way to treat a business fairly than by relaxing the redundancies in the approval process so they can expedite When businesses can turn on the lights and hang an open for business sign in the window.

That will be the day when thousands of our friends and neighbors can go back to work, and start earning an income. And our local governments can start to receive the revenues needed to deliver essential services. Our local elected leaders must meet this challenge. If it hasn't happened already we suggest a task force be created to start studying this issue right now.

Time is of the essence. Sincerely Joe Armadaris.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:50:37 · ≈ 10:50 AM

Thank you Mr. Armadaris.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:50:39 · ≈ 10:50 AM

And now we'll go to the phone with Andy Caldwell to be followed by Erica Goodfellow.

1:51 – 1:585 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:51:17 · ≈ 10:51 AM

Many of you know, I don't like the shutdown of our business. I think we could social distance at work just as easily as we can anywhere else. But having said that there is a growing resentment in the public that for appearance purposes it seems like all government jobs have been deemed essential The City of Santa Barbara and the City of Santa Maria have been starting to lay off people. The fact, the question is are there not one any single jobs in county government that were non-essential?

And secondly it's hard for us to believe that you have not begun layoffs right now knowing that revenue is going to take a hit and one of the biggest areas of revenue is going to be your pension obligations The bottom line here is that we are in a crisis, but you're basically saying hey everything we do is important even though the public sector's being shut down.

And there's been a petition, I've not joined it yet, but there's been a petition asking for elected officials to forego their salaries and top administrators to take a 30% cut. Here in Santa Barbara County this petition is growing I want to address one other issue, and that is back in 2014. The average pavement index for public works was 61. You guys at the board, and I know not many of you were on the board at that time, you told the voters that they should not have gone with the deferred maintenance measures that Supervisor Adams spearheaded because you were going to take care of this problem. Well, our maintenance index right now is at 56. You are following falling millions of dollars behind each and every year according to what you promised the voters.

And I think you need to realize that you guys argue this to the voters and you're not keeping your word and you're going further and further into debt. We believe again that you need to start dealing with your essential versus non-essential employees and avoid future pain to core essential services due the recession at hand. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:53:45 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Thank You Mr. Caldwell

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:53:47 · ≈ 10:53 AM

And we will now go to our final speaker Erica Goodfellow

CommentErica GoodfellowProposedself-stated1:54:40 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Hi, my name is Erica Goodfellow. Thank you so much for having me and for the time for public comment. I guess I just had some questions about the plans of the County of Santa Barbara as far as reopening now that things are kind of have gone on for a while with the COVID situation. I've been keeping up with local news as well as state news And everything I'm seeing seems to indicate that the curve is going downward in California and that we've successfully been able to do that, which is great news.

I've kept up with our county news and just seeing that there have not been a surge of cases or deaths, which is also fantastic news. The plan that the county and the city has for reopening our businesses. And I guess I've been hearing from local families, just about how hard they've been hit and I mean almost everyone I personally know has at least you know in a two adult household at least one person has lost their job or has their income extremely reduced right now.

Just found out that there was a domestic violence related murder about two streets down from where I used to live six months ago in the west side of Santa Barbara. So, I guess I'm just hearing these kind of stories and it's making me pretty concerned for...just in terms that this isn't the economy versus lives. Right now this is lives versus lives that are being impacted and Just kind of what the plan is to make sure that those other curves of domestic violence, suicide, mental health issues, unemployment. That just those curves don't spike and cause us more deaths and problems in the long run.

So thank you very much for considering that and for your work and advocacy for our city and county.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role1:56:58 · ≈ 10:56 AM

Thank you Miss Goodfellow I think we'll now take a ten minute break and then come back for the presentation about the departmental functional group summaries. Hello everyone.

2:02 – 2:101 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:02:21 · ≈ 11:02 AM

Okay. Yeah. you

2:11 – 2:171 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:11:09 · ≈ 11:11 AM

the board. Yeah. Hello. We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors budget workshop presentation and we're now at the stage where we have the departmental functional group summaries. Mr. Clemeni?

2:18 – 2:264 turns

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:18:01 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Thank you, Chair. So I'll be walking through the functional group summaries for each of the functional groups in our county starting with public safety. So in that group we have court special services district attorney fire probation public defender and the sheriff's office Just as a brief explanation here, what we've done is taken bullets from each department's individual presentations just to give a flavor of what's facing this functional group. We've done that on the next slide as well for their objectives and we've done this in each of the functional group summaries I'll be walking through today.

Each department's full presentations are available on the county website. COVID impacts, you'll see this on all the slides for the functional groups. Mr. Frappo gave a pretty good explanation of the impacts here for all the departments. Public safety it's going to be looking at declines in Prop 172 revenue as well as 2011 realignment which are sales tax based. Legislative changes there's been recent changes that have had negative impacts on revenue collections for some of these departments and caused increased workload for others We've got information technology needs, these are common across all departments in this functional group. The ubiquity of video footage from cell phones, body cameras and other sources are creating a high demand for data storage space as well as complicating the discovery process.

Video arraignment is another area that requires coordination between DA, sheriff, public defender and the courts. Recruitment, retention and succession planning. We see this as a perennial concern across all departments as well. Just being cognizant of upcoming retirements, preparing plans to transfer that knowledge, as well as offering trainings and career development opportunities to increase retention. This is a focus at the individual department level and also county wide through new 22.

And the final bullet here is the sheriff enters year three of the DSU model for law enforcement contracts with the cities. Just continuing to refine that methodology and modify agreements when needed to assure the sheriff is receiving full cost recovery. For 2021 objectives, we've got streamlining discovery exchange, pre-arrangement review and representation. Departments are working to develop public private partnerships to help leverage their resources and enhance their missions.

Recruiting and retaining staff. Fires looking to finalize the design and begin construction of a regional fire communications facility. And of course, the sheriff is looking to open and operate the Northern Branch Jail Facility next fiscal year. To give a little explanation on this slide, because we're going to be seeing it for each of the functional groups. The percentages we see here are the percent that this group comprises of the countywide total. So this first bullet here, general fund contribution, this group receives $142.1 million which is close to 50% of the countywide total distribution of general fund contribution.

Their operating expenditures are $374 million. That's about 1 3rd of the countywide total And their full-time equivalents are just over 1,500 FTE which is 36% of the countywide total. The five year revenue trends by department, just to explain this graph briefly as well, the solid color is the general fund contribution. And then the hashed color on top is total operating revenues, and these are five year trends by department. We're stacking the bars like this just to give an idea of how the department's general fund contribution compares to their revenues that are generated through charges for services, taxes, fines and fees in state and federal sources.

You can see here that GFC and operating revenues are mostly equivalent across the public safety departments, with the exception of the fire district which receives its own property tax allocation and thus no GFC. Operating expenditures are those incurred for the ongoing day-to-day operations of the department and include salaries and benefits, services and supplies. And other charges such as utilities, fleet charges, and liability insurance.

Not included in operating expenditures are capital expenses, transfers to other departments, and increases to fund balance. You can see the sheriff here looks like they've got a slightly steeper increase than other departments, which is likely driven in part by the addition of Northern Branch Jail staff. That's 99 staff that came on over the past few years which is going to drive up salary and benefits costs.

For five year staffing trend I'll just point out courts is not on this chart because their staff are employed by the Superior Courts not the county so in the county budget they show zero FTE. It's fairly flat in most apartments. Fire has been adding some staff based on city gate recommendations over the past few years, and again the sheriff's main driver of their increases has been those northern branch jail positions coming in.

There are only two departments this year that needed to make service level reductions to balance their budgets, both in this functional group. That's probation. They had to reduce a deputy probation officer position funded through SB 678 just due to its state revenue that is not keeping up with the cost of the program. I believe they still have about seven and a half FTE in this program going forward starting next year so they'll continue providing the service but they had to cut one position at about $127,000.

They're not requesting GFC backfill for this position. The Sheriff's Office did have to make three reductions, felony fugitive senior deputy and alternative sentencing custody sergeant and the Isla Vista Community Resources Senior Deputy. That totals 3 FTE for 580,000 about $580,500 and they are requesting restoration of all of these. To go over expansion requests requested by these departments in this functional group, the district attorney has two requests that are totaling three and a half FTE for about $460,000 in ongoing GFC.

The public defender we have two requests you see on this slide. And four more requests here. That's a total of six requests for 6 FTE, about $420,000 ongoing dollars and an additional $475,000 in one time. The Sheriff's Office has seven requests, totaling 37 FTE. I want to make one correction to note on this slide here. The sheriff has asked that the dispatch governance group, the $100,000 request there be changed to a one-time instead of ongoing request. So the totals at the bottom, the total requested ongoing GFC is actually about 5.5 million with an additional 1.7 million dollars in one time requests.

And finally, we've broken out cannabis-specific requests from departments as a separate expansion request slide. You'll see this for a few departments throughout the day. For district attorney, they're requesting the purchase of a full size truck for their cannabis enforcement team which is about $41,000 one time purchase plus 5,000 ongoing for maintenance costs.

And then the sheriff's office is requesting to add an additional cannabis enforcement team comprised of one sergeant, four detectives and one administrative office professional. That's six FTE for an ongoing cost of $1.2 million and 300,000 in one time start up costs. That completes the summary for this group.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:26:13 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Thank you Mr. Clemente. Any questions? Is this the moment for public comment? Okay.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:26:25 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have no request to speak on the Public Safety Functional Group.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:26:29 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Okay thank you.

2:26 – 2:3111 turns

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:26:36 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Then moving on to Health and Human Services. Supervisor Hartman had a question.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.842:26:42 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Thank you. So how would you like us to comment about our priorities or our observations to this? Do we wait till the end, do we wait after each area?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:55 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Supervisors, you can do it now after each functional group or you can do it at the end or both if you want to do it now it probably makes more sense because departments for those functional groups are keeping an ear out any questions you might have

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.842:27:11 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Well, I just want to say that I don't know how to weigh relatively the various requests from the Sheriff's Department and particularly the restorations. The three that he's had a balance one against the other but Community Resource Deputy in Isla Vista has been extraordinary. We have been working since at least 2014, if not decades to change the culture in Isla Vista and given Lieutenant Camarena and the Community Resources Deputy It really is changed and the statistics show that. And so from my perspective, this is an extremely high priority in a very densely populated area that has experienced a lot of incidents in the past and things are really getting better. So I would hate to undercut that effort. So thank you for hearing me out.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:28:19 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Thank you. Any other questions or comments? All right, Mr. Clemente, please continue.

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:28:27 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Thank you. Health and Human Services is made up of Behavioral Wellness, Child Support Services, First 5 Santa Barbara Public Health Department and Social Services. Some key challenges facing this department as with all others operational and fiscal impacts due to the COVID response Risks to funding streams due to legislative changes and economic outlook. We discussed some of the revenues that are sensitive to economic downturns, such as MHSA funding and realignment.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:29:05 · ≈ 11:29 AM

Did

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction2:29:05 · ≈ 11:29 AM

you mind pausing for a second? Supervisor Williams. Yes I That was actually the very moment I was voting so I missed the chance just ask a public safety question. I obviously think a lot of these positions that are being proposed to be eliminated are important, and so I'm trying to think of how that is possible in our current situation. And so for June, I would just ask if budget staff would make a deep examination on the ups and downs of overtime in the custody side?

And whether jail population affects that, the relationship of staffing and OT over there. So I guess three variables in a chart would be helpful. Jail population, how many FTEs and how much OT? Because obviously one Ways that we would have the wherewithal to deal with some of these service level reductions in a way desired by the departments is if we could figure out other things like how to budget savings in OT happening because the jail population remains low. For example, right now we have some of the lowest jail population we've had in some time.

And how long the county can sustain a low population remains to be seen. But if we did, that would create some of the savings that might be necessary to be able to restore some of these things in the budget.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:31:05 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.842:31:06 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Thank you, that reminded me too related to Isla Vista, Deltopia and Halloween have been at much lower levels of participation in the past year or two. And there must be some cost savings there as well and I'd like to see that.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:31:24 · ≈ 11:31 AM

Thank you. All right Mr. Clementi thank you again.

2:31 – 2:386 turns

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:31:38 · ≈ 11:31 AM

So I think I'm on the third bullet, expanded eligibility for services and its impacts. It's another key challenge and emerging issue for this group. I believe DSS pointed out a governor's budget proposal to expand Medi-Cal to seniors 65 years or older regardless of immigration status which they're saying will have impacts on in home supportive services. Medi-Cal Healthier California for All implementation, which would move Medi-Cal to a whole person care approach and impact all departments that interact with Medi-Cal recipients. For example it would change Be Well service delivery and funding models.

And finally succession planning which we've discussed. For the 2021 objectives, we have universal intake process pilot. Interagency collaboration working on increased outreach efforts to address the impacts of legislative changes. Expanding homeless sheltering and housing assistance. Technology replacement enhancement and the implementation by behavioral wellness of a local assisted outpatient treatment program with a more assertive proactive model including co-response.

This functional group receives $24.4 million in GFC, which is 8% of the county total. That's 8% because these departments are mostly administering state and federal programs and they're funded primarily through those sources. You see their operating expenditures are over a third of the countywide total at 419 million. And their full time equivalents are 41% of the county wide just over 1700 FTE.

You can see on this chart, it's a little difficult to see the slivers at the bottom or the solid bars. That's the GFC. It's very small relative to their total operating revenues and child support in first five received no GFC at all. With social services we can see a dip in the operating revenues that occurred in 17-18 that led to some of those staff reductions and layoffs we saw in that fiscal year.

Behavioral wellness and their operating expenditures, you see a more pronounced increase mostly driven by outpatient services and funding in alcohol and drug programs to provide more services. Child support and first five work very hard to keep their operating expenditures flat as we see here to stay within their funding streams. They do that by, you can see slowly, excuse me, Slowly reducing their FTE over time to maintain their expenditures within their funding streams.

With social services, you can clearly see the FTE reduction from fiscal year 17-18 and they've remained fairly flat since then. For expansion requests, we have two from public health both in animal services totaling 2.5 FTE about $240,000 and ongoing GFC requested with some one or one time cost of about $7300. And that concludes this functional group.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:35:05 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Thank you any questions for Mr. Clemeni? Yes, Madam Clerk

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:35:12 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we do have five requests to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:35:16 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Thank

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:35:16 · ≈ 11:35 AM

you. And we have three letters to be read into the record beginning with Celia Ramirez to be followed by Anna Campbell and last Tricia Thompson and then we will go to two callers Lynn Gibbs to be followed by George Kaufman. And we will get started with Celia Ramirez Hello, my name is Celia. I have a young adult son with a very serious mental health disorder and would like to thank the BOS for funding the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program. My son stopped taking his medication because in his mind he did not need it. Not unusual for someone with his diagnosis. We were scared for his safety and ours as he was showing symptoms of delusions and hallucinations. And we were feeling unsafe at home. The staff from AOT were helpful, persistent in gaining his trust.

The continuous visits and reaching out to him showed him others care about him. As most of his days were in isolation, I was grateful for the interactions he had with the outside world. I'm thankful for this program that got my son to get back to his doctor and medication. He now is working part time stable and enjoying family time together. I am hopeful Laura's Law gets funded on a consistent basis because it is a lifesaver for my son. Thank you, Celia Ramirez.

We will now go to a letter to be read into the record from Anna Campbell. When our son was 18, he fell and broke his neck. Our bright beautiful son was paralyzed. He recovered miraculously from the paralysis but had terrifying delusions. For 10 years we tried to get him into treatment. The county wouldn't give him the treatment he needed because he didn't believe he needed help. A heartbreaking catch 22.

In 2002, after Laura's Law passed statewide we asked the Board of Supervisors to adopt it for our county. Laura's Law mandates intensive outreach and civil court order treatment for those who are hospitalized and jailed repeatedly because of their mental condition. At that time he had been adopted by only three other counties and was a new idea. The board chose not to try it, a crushing disappointment. In 2005 her son died. A friend gave a gift in his memory to advocate for Laura's law to save the lives of other sons and daughters, sisters and brothers in our county. Now, 15 years later most California counties have adopted Laura's law also called AOT, Assisted Outpatient Treatment. The results are impressive reducing psychiatric hospitalizations, emergency room visits and incarcerations by 70% or more.

Evidence based research shows that AOT is effective. To the board's credit you took a chance three years ago and funded a very successful pilot program. It dramatically reduced expensive hospitalizations and incarcerations saving our county many thousands of dollars. The pilot program is over. It is time for the board to adopt, fund and fully implement Laura's Law. Thank you Anna

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:38:02 · ≈ 11:38 AM

Campbell.

2:38 – 2:434 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:38:06 · ≈ 11:38 AM

And our final letter to be read into the record is Tricia Thompson. Honorable Chair and Supervisor Hartman, Lavinino, Williams & Adam As a Santa Barbara County resident since 1966 And Jeffrey's mother, I ask that the statement written on April 10th 2020 and attached below be read into the record. I also urge the Board of Supervisors to give it serious consideration while formulating its decision in favor of Laura's law. A year ago, I spoke before you on behalf of Families Act and a mother pleading for help. My son suffering a psychotic breakdown believed he was a CIA trained government sanctioned assassin working with his deceased grandfather to save the world. He told me he could kill people by turning into a salamander and he demonstrated it by elaborately painting buildings, underpasses and street signs.

Costing property owners in the county untold thousands. I had pleaded with the care unit numerous times they wouldn't hospitalize him. He was arrested six times, they refused to keep him. Every agency told me he had to actually harm someone first. I lived in constant fear awaiting the call telling me that his delusions were now our reality. A statement saved my son's life. It resulted in behavioral wellness stepping in, advising and enabling me to use services provided by Laura's Law, the only means available to reach out to him personally. Because of Laura's Law teams were immediately sent out into the creek beds. They continued to engage him while incarcerated and they convinced him to try medication. Today he is healthy and rebuilding his life.

He describes the delusions that controlled him and prevented him from seeking help. He owes his life and possibly many others to those who were enabled by Laura's Law, and I no longer live in fear. I cannot express enough the importance of permanent funding for Laura's Law. Without it my life would be a nightmare, and my son wouldn't be here today. Thank you Trisha Thompson, Sponsorship Shales Director, PTSD Treatment for our local first responders.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:40:03 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Thank you Ms. Thompson, thank you for sharing your son's story.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:40:07 · ≈ 11:40 AM

And now we will go to the phone to call Lynn Gibbs, to be followed by George Kaufman.

CommentLynn GibbsProposedself-stated2:41:08 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Chair Hart and Supervisors, my name is Lynn Gibbs. I chair the NAMI Public Policy Committee. A couple days ago, I heard from a mother whose daughter is in the jail, incompetent to stand trial. She'll be waiting there awhile because the state hospitals have stopped admitting people at this time for restoration. poster child for diversion. We've made a good deal of progress this past year on diverting people with mental illness via the county's CIP program, our co-response teams and I look forward to the time when Forensic Mental Health Rehabilitation Center, a secured facility will open in the county So that persons like this young woman who we're sitting in the jail now can be in treatment instead.

And now we're beginning to focus more intensively on the adequate treatment we need to divert people too. Every time someone avoids a crisis through diversion, they save the county money. NAMI wants to thank Behavioral Wellness and Dr. Blackhorn for their commitment and their success In the AOT pilot program. So there's, I think a sign of the success of our understanding of the value of the program is that now people are actually asking statewide to relax the criteria for AOT participation. And we do have to strike a balance between protecting people's rights and getting, have a capacity to recognize their need. For future AOT is full adoption, expansion in North County, referrals when people leave and belong stabilized Thank you Ms. Gibbs and thank you for your continued advocacy for mental health services

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:43 – 2:494 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:43:52 · ≈ 11:43 AM

And we will now go to our last speaker, George Kaufman.

CommentAnna CampbellProposed2:45:07 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Hi, good morning. Today I'd like to recognize your efforts on the terms of the Board of Supervisors and also the teamwork that the county departments working together with the community has created in starting to achieve some real progress on providing services for the most vulnerable, hard-to-serve citizens that live with serious mental health disorders. While the mandate of our behavioral wellness department is to serve indigent persons with severe and persistent mental illness, too often in the past we've failed the ill of these folks. And sometimes with horrific outcomes as you've heard firsthand from some of the families.

The assisted outpatient treatment programs have begun to change this and it's helping many folks who are also among the highest utilizers of various county services Incarceration and hospitalizations have also avoided or reduced the treatment. For this, clients and families were grateful. We're also grateful to the Sheriff's Department for restoring robust mental health crisis intervention team training programs which this year will train hundreds of community law enforcement officers and custody deputies in de-escalation Diversion techniques and some of these officers are then going to be assigned to mental health co-response teams along with Be Well crisis mental health workers. These teams are already achieving improved outcomes that are further reducing incarceration and increasing diversion into treatment.

We understand the county finances are going to once again be stressed this year, this time by our current Mental Health Emergency But it would be unthinkable at this point to step back from our team effort and commitment to these evidence-based and cost effective interventions, which are already changing the lives and saving money. There's much more improvement to be realized if we can continue our momentum to further enhance the impact of these three programs.

Increased use of the judicial component for example of AOT, more trained CIT officers and more core response teams can only lead to further improvement in our outcomes. We at NAMI urge you to approve the provisions for these programs and the behavioral wellness budget as well as the other departmental budgets, and we look forward continuing to work together with you and all of the involved county departments to help achieve the behavioral wellness mandate to effectively serve its most persistently ill

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:47:53 · ≈ 11:47 AM

and most difficult-to-serve clients Thank you Mr. Coffin, appreciate your comments. I think we are now back to Supervisor Williams has a question.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction2:48:09 · ≈ 11:48 AM

So just I guess a board question to answer as we wrestle with this for June is how much of the AOT pilot money is left over if anything? I know that the costs were coming in lower than Was expected, but that the department had extended the program without any additional allocation from the board because of that. And maybe some examination of whether the additional expenses actually using the judge effect instead of just the specter of the judge effect in AOT would cause that to go up from what has gone before, and just some knowledge whether it's in the departmental recommended budget or not.

2:49 – 2:576 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:49:12 · ≈ 11:49 AM

Chair and Supervisors, the department is not asking for a general fund expansion to fund this program. And if you look in the slides that the department has provided, and we can have Dr. Gleghorn, I know she's on the phone. She's proposing a Santa Barbara better than AOT program as she calls it. So she's lined up to speak and I'd like to hear from her. Jacqueline, if you could pull her up?

Okay. Oh, OK. Pam, I think is Pam Fisher on the line? Yes, I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:49:54 · ≈ 11:49 AM

on the line. Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:49:54 · ≈ 11:49 AM

Thanks Doctor Fisher. Yes can you speak to that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:49:57 · ≈ 11:49 AM

just yes? Yes so as you recall at the request of the Board of Supervisors we the department was contracted three years ago to do a three year pilot and really look at the different components And we've done so and we have the results of our three year pilot. Followed 118 of those referred, and that was because the referral criteria was narrow. There are specific criteria that we must follow due to the LORS law and that is the AOT eligibility criteria on the individual as well as the referring party. And so many people were excluded from us being able Do the outreach and engagement, and for some of them we referred them on to other teams. But they were excluded from this pilot. As and then the folks that actually went through the AOT petition was very small.

It was only 7%. So what we know worked, and what was the recommendations of our external evaluator is that what they found was that the intensive outreach and engagement efforts Um, was that was what would reduce the negative life events? Uh it was of incarceration of the psychiatric ER visits and of the psychiatric hospitalizations. That plus the placement efforts that we did to house people and our act wraparound program And that actually the evidence of the black robe effect, they found no evidence of it. And in fact it was mixed. Some other folks that went through it did not take the meds that were mandated to take some were off and on and so it was very, very mixed.

It's a very timely discussion because this is being talked about at the state level right now. Governor Newsom has many comments on this program, and he in fact is also saying that we need to remove some of the conditions that are imposed In the counties that are trying to implement Laura's law so we can expand who benefits and that's what we're proposing. We're proposing to go forward eligibility criteria so that we don't exclude people and that we take what we've learned. And what we've learned is that we would open it up to concerned citizens, to friends and folks like that who are concerned about people and we would still continue to go and engage for the people that are concerned and go ahead and do the intensive outreach for those folks instead of excluding people.

So that's what we're talking about when we say a better than AOT program. And we would continue to do the intensive outreach, we'd continue to do the housing and placement wraparound type services in ACT. Does that answer the question?

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:53:18 · ≈ 11:53 AM

Yeah. Okay, thank you very much for that additional clarification. Any other questions for this section? Okay Mr. Clemente, thank you.

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:53:31 · ≈ 11:53 AM

Thank you, Chair Hart. Next we have Community Resources and Public Facilities Functional Group. It's made up of the Agricultural Commissioner in Weights and Measures, Community Services Department, Planning and Development, and Public Works. Some key challenges and emerging issues facing this group, cannabis permitting enforcement and compliance programs that heavily involves Ag Commissioner and P&D.

New state mandated programs such as Ag Commissioner I believe Regulations of Industrial Hemp. Staffing issues, COVID impacts that we've discussed for this department. Jeff did touch on these earlier with CSD overnight camping closures, the restaurant revenues declining, public works gas tax revenue likely to fall and if permanent activity begins to drop P&D is going to see some impacts as well to their revenues.

Deferred maintenance backlog to address parks facilities. Housing Division of Community Services seeking to collaboratively address homelessness with an added sense of urgency now during this pandemic and utilizing new technology to enhance customer and staff experiences. 2021 objectives here just a focus around staff development and succession planning, going digital wherever possible and strengthening of internal financial controls This group receives $20.3 million in general fund contribution, that's only 7% of the countywide total.

Their operating expenditures are 224 million, that's 19% of the county total and their FTEs are at about 522 for 12% of the county total. For the five year operating revenue and GFC trends, these departments are mostly either fee driven or they receive state and federal dollars which is why their GFC is such a relatively small piece of their total revenues.

Public works we see some steeper growth in revenues than the other departments here mostly driven by increases in transportation as more state and federal dollars have come in as well as increased fees coming in to fund the Tahequa's project and debt issuance. The operating expenditures here mostly mirror the previous slide. Community services expenditures are rising due mostly to influx of funding and related expenses in their housing and community development division.

Staffing has mostly been flat in these departments, we see some recent increases in P&D which is mostly due to the addition of cannabis permitting and enforcement staff. Community Services Department has six expansion requests, including one related to libraries which you'll hear a special issue presentation on later in this workshop. The requests are totaling 1.5 FTE, about $1.7 million in ongoing funds and $2 million in one time requests.

Planning and Development also has a special issue they'll be presenting tied to their expansion request of two additional planners and long-range planning, about $260,000. And Public Works is requesting ongoing funds of $4.2 million to address deferred maintenance needs for roads. And that concludes this functional group.

2:57 – 3:0415 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:57:05 · ≈ 11:57 AM

Thank you Mr. Clemente any questions on this section?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction2:57:12 · ≈ 11:57 AM

Supervisor Williams I'll hold my questions on the library for that presentation. The ECAP development and implementation, what would be delayed by not moving forward with that?

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed2:57:32 · ≈ 11:57 AM

I would defer to the department on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:39 · ≈ 11:57 AM

Let me see if Mr. Chapchin is on here because I believe that was for CST. I am, can

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction2:57:50 · ≈ 11:57 AM

you hear me?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:57:52 · ≈ 11:57 AM

Yes George before you get started can you please mute any other devices you have in the background please? Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:58:07 · ≈ 11:58 AM

Mr. Chapman, go ahead if you're ready?

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction2:58:13 · ≈ 11:58 AM

Is that better? Yes thank you. Okay sorry about that I think what would be delayed is the work on the ECAP, the environmental impact report and the new ECAP numbers for the county. You know board gave us direction to move aggressively towards those new emission reductions and the way to do that would be the 2030 ECAP goals So that would be the delay for us to come back. We have a consultant, we sent out an RFP, received the price for the EIR, for the ECAP and that's about between 500,000 to 750 so that would be delayed until we're able to start work on it.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction2:59:01 · ≈ 11:59 AM

So does that would that delay not just our reporting but delay. Recommendations of how to achieve our greenhouse gas emission goals. Yes. Thank

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:59:15 · ≈ 11:59 AM

you. OK. Mr. committee would you like to continue?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:59:23 · ≈ 11:59 AM

Chair members of the board before we get started I would just like to note for the record we had no request to speak on community resources and public facilities

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role2:59:29 · ≈ 11:59 AM

thank you very much. Thank you.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction2:59:33 · ≈ 11:59 AM

Well, I just mentioned that this would be a uniquely good time to have recommendations for achieving our goals since human behavior is changing so much during the COVID crisis. It would seem especially unfortunate for us not to have any analysis of how to achieve those goals during this time.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:00:10 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Okay, the next item is General Government and Support Services.

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed3:00:16 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Thank you Chair Hart. The departments making up this functional group include the Auditor Controller, the Clerk Recorder Assessor, General Services. Northern Branch Jail Project, that's the construction piece which operates under its own department but it has no staff. General Services manages that department. Human Resources, Treasurer Tax Collector and Public Administrator. And then Debt Service which also lives in the budget as its own department but it is managed by the Treasurer Tax Collector and has no staff.

The general fund contribution to this group is $38.3 million, that's 13% of the county total. Operating expenditures around 10%, with $105.5 million and FTE of 355 which is about 8%. Some key challenges and emerging issues, just pulled out from the individual departments on this slide. Implementation of a public safety radio network as well as other growing number of capital maintenance projects county wide information technology systems assessments and support.

The employee training development and retention legislative changes impacting elections. And potential impacts to revenues, traditional tax payment methods and voting due to COVID-19. A few of these objectives for this group, including auditor controller leading and participating in the countywide business applications needs assessment. HR is seeking to create a blueprint for the employee performance appraisal system. And a couple general services items such as developing a capital assets life cycle policy and strategic plan as well as some department reorganization getting facilities maintenance and capital projects under a single division.

For the five year revenue and GFC trend of note here, General Services manages most of the county's internal service funds such as utilities and the motor pool. And the revenues to operate those funds are generated from charges to departments which is why such a large proportion of general services is non-GFC. The northern branch jail operating revenues are entirely comprised of reimbursements from the state as work gets done on the project.

The operating expenditures pretty much exactly mirror the operating revenues. Staffing for these groups has remained fairly constant. We have seen some slight decreases, one or two FTE and auditor controller and treasurer tax collector over the past few years as well as some growth in general services in the past four years. For the expansion requests, clerk recorder assessor is requesting one department business specialist for succession planning at 114,000 ongoing.

General services has two requests to add staffing related to contracts and their HR management. Two FTE for 325,000 ongoing and 7500 in one time. Human Resources is also looking to add a department business specialist to their administration and operations division at one FTE. It's about $116,000 ongoing. And Treasure Tax Collector is seeking to add financial office professional expert to lead their North County office. That's one FTE, about 162,000 ongoing.

And then Treasurer Tax Collector also has a cannabis related request seeking to add a financial office professional senior to augment their cannabis tax collection efforts. That's one FTE for about 128,000. Supervisor Hartman?

3:04 – 3:1214 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.843:04:27 · ≈ 12:04 PM

Yes, I had a question. Our treasurer is also our public guardian and so the requests about the recommendations that come from the AOT pilot study, Laura's Law suggests both from the governor a housing conservatorship engaging the public guardian to initiate conservatorship, I assume expansion. So I don't see that here so I just wondered did that fall through the cracks or can it be done with existing resources or how will that be addressed?

CommentAs MrProposed3:05:08 · ≈ 12:05 PM

Supervisor Hartman to the Chair. We don't have a request from the treasurer at the moment with respect to Your board did add a position in the current fiscal year to enhance their ability to respond and participate in the program. This program obviously, as you know, touches several county departments and they work collaboratively together to figure out what resources are needed so that not any one piece of that puzzle is shorted. To do so would slow down the entire process. So we do a good job working together. We're happy to engage the treasurer with respect to the changing director for the state

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:05:48 · ≈ 12:05 PM

Thank you. Mr. Clemente, go ahead and

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed3:05:49 · ≈ 12:05 PM

continue. The final functional group we have today is the policy and executive group. That's your Board of Supervisors, County Council, the County Executive Office, and general county programs.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:06:05 · ≈ 12:06 PM

Chair Hart, members of the board, before we move on to our last functional group I did just want to note for the record that we had no public comment for the general government in support

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:06:13 · ≈ 12:06 PM

services. Thank you Madam Clerk. Sorry, forgot to ask you that.

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed3:06:18 · ≈ 12:06 PM

Okay?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction3:06:19 · ≈ 12:06 PM

Excuse me just one second. I'm thinking that there may be some, so maybe we could just reserve a little couple minutes later for that comment.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:06:34 · ≈ 12:06 PM

If we get a comment, we can go back to that. Do you think, Supervisor Adams, someone is trying to get through?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction3:06:42 · ≈ 12:06 PM

I believe that somebody might be trying to get through, but I'm not absolutely certain of that. So bear in mind that that might happen later. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:06:54 · ≈ 12:06 PM

Mr. Clement go ahead and we'll get that when it happens. Sure.

CommentGovernor NewsomProposed3:06:59 · ≈ 12:06 PM

So for key challenges and emerging issues facing this group, COVID-19 at the top of the list here with coordinating response to recovery from the pandemic. Facilitating the continuation of county government strategic planning for county wide revenue and expenditure impacts as well as council providing legal advisory services. Council's also looking forward to litigation of their standard portfolios in major nonstandard cases.

And CEO's office is managing the countywide KPMG operational and performance review process with periodic reports to your board. 2021 objectives include continuing to work with the community on recovery from the COVID pandemic, Efficiently and effectively using public resources and maintaining the long-term fiscal health and sustainability of our county. Continuing to support and enhance economic vitality in Santa Barbara County, as well as council's timely legal support for a variety of disaster issues, cannabis, water issues, PSPS, and the emergency ambulance RFP.

This group receives 24% of the countywide total GFC at $71.9 million, which sounds like a lot compared to the size of the functional group but you'll see on the next slide that the vast majority of that goes into the General County Programs Department which is a non-operating department That holds and allocates funds for a wide variety of county-wide projects. This is where the strategic reserve is held, the northern branch jail operating fund we're building up. Cannabis tax revenues are held here so it's a large amount of GFC coming in here to be allocated out.

Operating expenditures you see are only 5% of the county wide total at 55 million and FTE are about 102%. This slide is where you see that almost all of the GFC in this functional group is in the general county programs department. A couple other items to note here, you'll see County Council's GFC almost doubling in 2021. It's gone up about $4 million compared to the prior year while their operating revenue is dwindling to almost nothing as a result of a budget development policy adopted by your board in December stopping central service departments from direct charging special revenue funds instead capturing that cost through the cost allocation plan.

So while their GFC has increased about $4 million excuse me The general fund is recovering that $4 million through the cap charges to those special revenue funds. Also, the CEO's office has fairly high operating revenues compared to council and the board. This is because the risk division which manages general liability and workers' compensation funds is contained within the CEO's department.

Those funds have high revenues in the form of rates charged out to departments and then high expenditures that you'll see on the next slide for payments out to our service providers. You'll see on this slide, as I mentioned general county programs has been mostly holding fund has very low operating expenditures with no salaries and benefits. Staffing's almost completely flat with the board. Council and CEO both had dips in 17-18 along with many other departments, but have regained staff since.

General county programs used to house one staff, FTE to staff the Human Services Commission, but that has since transferred to CSD a couple years ago so you see no FTE anymore in general county programs. The CEO's office through the Office of Emergency Management has two expansion requests totaling $275,000 to retain consultants to develop continuity of operations plans and to update an operational area joint powers agreement and emergency management ordinance.

And council is requesting a legal office professional to support their managing attorneys. That's one FTE for about $134,000 ongoing. And finally, CEO also has a cannabis related request to add a principal analyst for cannabis oversight. That's one FTE at about $208,000. That concludes this group.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:11:32 · ≈ 12:11 PM

Thank you Mr. Clemente. Any questions? For staff at this point? Okay we have public comment. Excuse me Supervisor Hartman had a question.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.843:11:44 · ≈ 12:11 PM

It was really more just a comment, and that is I know if we could consider expansion requests. I think interpreting our board meetings in Spanish is something I'd like to put on the agenda going forward. I know we've learned a lot in the various emergencies, including our COVID crisis. And I think even though people can speak English some of the materials we discuss are quite complex and so I think having it available in Spanish would certainly make it much more available to a large portion of our population.

3:12 – 3:2111 turns

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction3:12:27 · ≈ 12:12 PM

Supervisor Williams? I'd like to chime in on that, we should at least look at what that would cost.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:12:36 · ≈ 12:12 PM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:12:37 · ≈ 12:12 PM

Any other questions or comments? Do we have any public comment?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:12:40 · ≈ 12:12 PM

Chair Hart, members of the board, I would just like to note for the record, we had no requests to speak on policy and executive group summary.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:12:46 · ≈ 12:12 PM

Okay. And then we have some final slides here. Is that Mr. Frapprell? Thank you Mr. Clementi by the way, well done.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:13:07 · ≈ 12:13 PM

Thank you Mr. Chair so as we look forward, thank you,

CommentAs MrProposed3:13:14 · ≈ 12:13 PM

a new day everything is clean in between. As we look forward and we certainly have uncharted territory and certainly an uncertain future But as we look forward in exercising our fiscal responsibility and making strategic investments, it's important I think that the county budget is going to use our commitment to responsible fiscal practices. And they're outlined here on the chart primarily to use one-time funds and one-time costs to allocate cannabis revenues to the enforcement of one-time uses and to backfill discretionary losses which we hope is a short term need To fund high-priority initiatives, including capital needs and technology enhancements.

To enable our employees to optimize operations and reduce costs through training. The essence of Renew22 as brought up earlier this morning is really to help us be resilient as an organization. We're being tested clearly and I think that what we've seen in these early stages departments have stepped up to that challenge. We as a county must In our response to this pandemic, as well as how we continue forward.

I think it's important that as we look at budget development, we are strategic, we are forward looking and importantly meaning that we want to resist the temptation to make short term decisions that have negative long-term ramifications. And so I think as we're developing recommended budget you'll see that come through as we weigh the various options that your board has to consider on defund or not fund As we conclude workshops after this afternoon hopefully, really there are key things that have to happen.

We have to continue to evaluate and adjust for our COVID-19 impacts both on the revenue side and expense side. We have to work with departments to make those COVID related adjustments within their departments as I mentioned before there are some departments that have specific Revenues that will be impacted, or costs to respond. And we're going to have to make those changes to the preliminary budgets those departments submitted back in February.

We're going to begin developing budget reduction and contingency plans for each department should those actions be necessary mid-year. And we'll complete the recommended budget scheduled for release in May and ultimately leading up to your hearings that are set in June. So that concludes our comments before the special issues for your board's consideration.

Be happy to answer any questions.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:15:58 · ≈ 12:15 PM

Thank you, Mr. Farquaad. Your caution is duly noted and super important. This is a unique time and it requires us to be agile and flexible and adaptive. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.843:16:12 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Well I do think Renew 2022 is, I'm glad we started that. I'm glad our CEO and her staff had the vision to be putting that in place and I think some of the things were experiencing with the COVID crisis are in fact realizing this and I guess going forward it would be nice to have our after action report looking at some of these but I believe video arraignment is going to be starting very soon We have significantly reduced our jail population. We do have many people working at home, many who we may not have even realized it was possible. A lot more going on with telehealth. So these may be some further opportunities to realize some of the goals learning in this process. So just trying to find the silver lining here and to thank again our CEO for the foresight to get us to this point so we are more flexible and resilient.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:17:16 · ≈ 12:17 PM

Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Supervisor Williams? Well

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction3:17:21 · ≈ 12:17 PM

in agreement with Supervisor Hartman that maybe to add more to it What I've noticed after being here for one term, and I'm sure some of you have noticed more a huge cost driver on our expenses is our jail and our jail population level. How many, what percentage of those people are awaiting trial versus how many people of those are already convicted? And so one significant issue will be the battle in November over bail reform.

The opposition to bail reform has put an initiative on the ballot to overturn that if If that effort is unsuccessful, bail reform according to most folks will save us money over the long run and help us continue to keep that number low. So I do think that is a real positive possibility out there especially if we talk about it as a community and And trying to keep in place some of these things that for many years couldn't happen, for whatever reason. But all of a sudden because of the coronavirus crisis have been able to happen like televised arraignment for one and these things are probably better from a human perspective and they're also better from a budget perspective If we can maintain effort. Of course, the big takeaway is both probably in terms of the jobs because there's 5,000 jobs out there that pay an average of $65,000 a year and they're not going away.

They're only adding and then they're providing this revenue and Maybe what saves us through this economic time. Many of the people being laid off other sectors may have opportunities there and, of course, the only reason why we'll be able to maintain some of our staffing in necessary areas of public safety is because of the marijuana tax revenue. So I do think that speaks to the fact that we need Both because of that and because of the point that Ms. Renee O'Neill pointed out of the necessary element of enforcement, that we should process these permits as quickly as possible. Long processing of permits only delays enforcement, complicates enforcement makes it more difficult to assess who the bad and good guys are.

So you know, I mean we there are. are in their 15th month of processing their permit, right? With no end in sight. So we, PND is doing all that they, you know, PND has been working very, very hard to do what they can. I think everybody's been working hard to do what they can. But we need to, if we are going to react to this crisis, we need to react with some urgency in that because it seems almost foolish to leave those jobs and the revenue and the potential help for our community on the table.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:21 – 3:245 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:21:31 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Any other comments or questions from Santa Maria? Supervisor Lavanino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.863:21:37 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Thank you Mr. Chair. I'm actually probably one of those people that actually likes budget workshops and the budget time because it's really interesting to kind of really delve deep into the county and find out more about what we do and how we finance things. I just wanted to let folks know if anybody is watching or anybody is paying attention, My lack of questions are no reflection of my lack of interest. It's just that I feel like budgets are made up of projections and numbers, and quite honestly we can't really get a firm grip on what those numbers are right now. So for me, I understand why we shrunk this down. I think it was a smart move by our CEO, another smart move that we only take one day to do this but I don't want people to get the impression that we're just kind of blasting through this.

It doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to spend a lot of time reflecting on numbers at this point. We're going to get the Governor's May revise, and I think our strategy is a sound one in that we defer as many decisions as possible. So I'm supportive of the move that we are going in. But I also don't want people to feel that we're just short shifting the whole budget situation. So it is very important to all of us, it's just this now right now.

We've heard of drive-by budgets, this one's going by at about 150 miles an hour or so. It's just a point in time. I know we're doing the best that we can and I appreciate all the work of the budget team. They're trying to do something that right now isn't It actually can't be done in a reasonable manner. So I appreciate the effort that was put in, and we'll see where we are in June.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:23:34 · ≈ 12:23 PM

Thank you Supervisor Lavenino. And

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction3:23:38 · ≈ 12:23 PM

I'm going to save my comments for the end.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:23:41 · ≈ 12:23 PM

Okay thank you. We want to come back after closed session. We're going to adjourn to closed session but when we come back we'll be able to talk about the special issues, The Planning and Development Long-Range Planning Work Program. And then we'll have questions from board members about individual department budgets, and then the board deliberation and comment. So at this time we will adjourn or recess to close session.

County Council could you please read the items for consideration?

3:24 – 3:263 turns

CommentDebt ServiceProposed · by introduction3:24:09 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Chair and Supervisors, today in closed session the Board will have one matter of conference with real property negotiators. The involved properties are potential conservation easements over properties near the intersection of San Miguelito Road and Sudden Road southwest of the city of Lompoc. Agency negotiators, General Services Director Pell and Planning and Development Director Plowman. Negotiating party Daniel Duke for Straus Wind Energy LLC under negotiation price in terms for the county's potential acceptance of a conservation easement involving the Strauss wind energy project. My estimate is about one hour.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role3:24:46 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Well then in that case we will adjourn until 130. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:25:53 · ≈ 12:25 PM

Yeah. Thank you.

3:34 – 4:002 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed3:34:31 · ≈ 12:34 PM

Okay. Hello.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:39:08 · ≈ 12:39 PM

Thank you. Yeah. Yeah. you Okay. Hmm. Hello. You. Thank you.

4:06 – 4:162 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed4:06:52 · ≈ 1:06 PM

you Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed4:10:02 · ≈ 1:10 PM

You. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Music

4:23 – 4:312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed4:23:43 · ≈ 1:23 PM

Okay. Okay. Okay.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:28:06 · ≈ 1:28 PM

Okay. Do you have a report? Excuse me, we'll now reconvene from closed session. Mr. Gazzani do you have a report?

4:31 – 4:468 turns

CommentDebt ServiceProposed · by introduction4:31:00 · ≈ 1:31 PM

Chair and supervisors today in closed session the board considered one matter which was real property negotiations concerning potential conservation easement over properties near the intersection of San Miguelito Road and Sudden Road southwest of the city of Lompoc. Agency negotiators are General Services Director Jeanette Pell And Planning and Development Director Lisa Plowman. Negotiating party is Daniel Duke for Straus Wind Energy LLC under negotiation.

Conservation easement involving the Straus Wind Energy Project, there are no reportable actions and I note that Supervisor Adam recused from participation in the matter.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:31:43 · ≈ 1:31 PM

Thank you Mr. Guzzone we'll now return to the budget workshop and the next item up are the special issues

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction4:31:51 · ≈ 1:31 PM

Thank you Chair Hart and members of the board, good afternoon. Pleasure to be here today to talk about the library issues. As you know, the board formed an ad hoc committee to work with staff and library staff to come up with some recommendations for library funding. A sustainable model, potentially. The ad hoc committee right now is just not there yet. I think we will be coming back with that report before the June budget hearings.

Ryder Bailey our CFO has been working with the Ad Hoc Committee and Ryder will do the presentation for the budget. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:32:26 · ≈ 1:32 PM

you Mr.

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction4:32:27 · ≈ 1:32 PM

Bailey. Thank you George.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:32:30 · ≈ 1:32 PM

And before I begin today's presentation on our countywide library system, I would like to thank the board for the opportunity to present this issue. With everything that's going on, I would like to recognize your commitment to libraries as a critical resource to our community. While library doors remain closed, our county librarians have been intuitive in their delivery by offering books and material delivered by mail, virtual story times on YouTube, extended the due dates on materials And they continue to provide access to free online resources such as Overdrive and Libby, Hoopla, and RB Digital.

For immediate access to these resources please log on to blackgold.org On the left hand side you'll see get a library card and you'll have access to those resources immediately This afternoon I will provide a brief background on how we got to where we are today An overview of our unique library delivery model. The good work of our ad hoc committee specifically on benchmarking, an update on projected fiscal year 2021 status quo deficits and finally staff's recommendation.

As a background, in October of 2018 your board established an ad hoc committee with the aim to establish a long-term equitable and sustainable model. The ad hoc committee is made up of two County Board Supervisors, all four City Library Administrators, a Library Friends member, a County Library Advisory Committee member, and the CSD Director. The Ad Hoc Committee broke into two working groups, one focused on benchmarking and equity. The other on identifying potential funding sources.

During this presentation you will receive the results of the Benchmarking Subcommittee while the work of the Funding Subcommittee results will be part of the full ad hoc committee report prior to budget hearings in June. Today staff is asking your board to consider two issues. The recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee and Library Advisory Committee to address inequities across the county library system, and the existing status quo deficits of county branch libraries.

A brief overview of our county-wide library system. This half century old partnership between a county and four cities that we contract to administer our nine County Branch Libraries is unique. The county contracts with the City of Santa Barbara to operate Carpinteria and Montecito Branch libraries. Lompoc operates the Vandenberg Village branch. Santa Maria operates Cuyama, Orcutt, Los Alamos and Guadalupe branches while Galena operates Buelton and Solvang County Branch libraries On a later slide I will break out how libraries are funded Most of that funding is from county and city general funds with very little coming from a dedicated revenue source There are no reserves or fund balances to help offset operating costs, and the county branch libraries have become reliant on one-time funding by your board in recent years.

The Ad Hoc Benchmarking Subcommittee Working Group is made up of our four library directors and was facilitated by Legacy Works Group. They categorized our libraries into four groups, small ones, small twos, mediums and mains based on population serves and needs of the communities. As a note, Santa Barbara's east side and the four main branch main libraries are not county branch libraries.

Standards that the Ad Hoc Benchmarking Working Group evaluated were staffing levels, open hours, collections, programming and outreach, technology, and facilities. Each of these standards has its own slide in my presentation. Now before I get into the detail on this slide, I would like to outline how this slide and the next following slides will be presented.

The rows display the following beginning with the current range of service The next row is benchmarking averages of our four local and similar jurisdictions. Phase 1, highlighted here, is what the Ad Hoc Committee and Library Advisory Committee are recommending. Phase 2, the final row, is a goal to work towards. I would like to highlight that red text indicates where Phase 1 recommended standards are not currently being met.

The largest cost in addressing inequities is related to staffing. The Benchmarking Committee identified inequities in staff present in our libraries at a time and their levels of experience. Many libraries only staff a single person at a time, the committee is recommending a minimum of two staff persons be present. Having two staff persons at a time will enhance service delivery and add additional security and safety to staff.

Other inequities in staffing noted would be the recommendation of a full-time lead at small two branches and the recommendation of a professional librarian at our medium sized branches. The ad hoc committee saw little more consistency in open hours with Kuyama being the biggest outlier, small one libraries all fell short of benchmarking data and phase one recommendations Small twos met or exceeded the benchmarking, and only ORCUT fell short of benchmarking for medium-sized libraries.

Once again those are highlighted in red. The Benchmarking Subcommittee found a wider range of funding allocated for collections across the system from as little as 47 cents per capita up to $4.57 at the Carpinteria branch. The 2018 California state average was $4.37, collections budget per capita. The committee set the phase one goal at $2. Programs and outreach.

Our benchmarking committee evaluated programs offered at each of our branches and determined that early childhood literacy programs and youth summer reading programs should be offered at all libraries regardless of size. They also recommended adding school-age, teen and adult programming at small two and medium sized branches. In today's world technology is more important than ever.

And libraries are seeing significant increase in use of their Wi-Fi, mobile hotspots and computer workstations. The committee identified substandard internet at Cuyama and Los Alamos, and the lack of a comprehensive five-year replacement program resulting in the use of outdated devices. And lastly, facilities. We are looking to improve the security and safety of our county branch libraries.

As an item to note, two libraries do not have dedicated facilities and therefore pay rent out of their county per capita funding. This puts them at a disadvantage against branches that do not. A long-term goal would be to identify a dedicated facility for these two branches, Guadalupe and Orcutt. This is a high level slide of the past few slides And how the library's existing standards compare to the phase one committee recommendations. A green Y means these standards are being met, while a white N means we're not meeting the committee's recommended standards.

Here is that same slide overlaid with costs. Going across the columns, the largest cost to achieve Phase 1 recommendations is staffing. Since additional staffing is also required to achieve our goals, most of that cost is noted in the first column. Moving across to the right, the cost to address collections at a minimum of $2 per capita is nearly $80,000 across all the libraries.

Programming to meet those standards, $107,000. Technology, $42,000 Facilities is estimated at $87,000 The total cost to meet minimum standards is $670,000 Budgeted funding sources So this is a slide that displays how all the libraries in the county are funded including the four main branches This is a chart that was presented last year and has been updated for current-year information.

The cells highlighted in orange denote the largest source of revenue for that library. The county per capita, or city funding, is the largest source for each library with Montecito Friends Group as the only exception. The county contribution of $3.5 million into the system accounts for nearly a quarter of the spending. Our city partners fund approximately 60%, and the remainder is made up of dedicated measures, friends, groups, donations, fundraising and other.

Status quo deficits. It's important to note that status quo deficits need to be addressed before addressing the inequities I've highlighted in my presentation. In column A, you have the status quo deficits by branch listed out. This is to maintain existing hours and programming. I'm going to jump over to column E. Column E is the cost to bring us up to the minimum standards identified by the Benchmarking Committee. The sum of the status quo deficits in column A and the work of the Ad Hoc Equity Committee 640,000. Some of those too is about 1.3 million and that ties to my request for funding.

Now this is the full request and it would be lower if partner cities or friend groups increased their contributions. Column B is the ad hoc committee's recommended funding model. This is designed to incentivize our partners. This proposed funding model is based on the prior year's incentivized funding plan where the county offered additional funding on a one-to-one match with cities and two to one with friends groups.

This model would increase per capita funding for unincorporated branch libraries from $7.80 to $15.60. For county branches located within city limits, it would increase the per capita by $3.90 to $11.70. It would also increase funding to mains by $1 from $7.80 to $8.80, but this funding would be earmarked for administering branch libraries. The sum of that column B would entirely go to county branch libraries either directly or indirectly. Let me give you a quick example.

So for Carpinteria, its status quo deficit is $84,000. If we increase their per capita funding by 50% from $780,000 to $1170,000 that would generate an extra $66,000 leaving a remaining gap of $18,000. We will look to our partner to help close that gap. Make up what the benchmarking committee proposed, it would be an additional $45,000. Another quick example, Orcutt currently has a $105,000 status quo deficit. If we were to double their per capita because they're in an unincorporated area that'd be an extra $280,000 towards that library They would have a positive NFI of $175,000. That still would not be enough to cover the cost of the ad hoc committee's 220 in column E.

So to briefly summarize, the status quo deficits in column A would have to be addressed first. If we want to fully incorporate the work of the Ad Hoc Committee's benchmarking it'd be an extra 640,000 for a total of 1.3 million. Staff's two recommendations are as follows, that your board consider providing additional funding to address status quo gaps while directing staff to seek cost sharing with our city partners.

And to consider provide funding above existing library needs levels to work towards the committee's phase one equitable and sustainable standards outlined during this presentation. The ad hoc committee will return to your board with a more thorough report prior to budget hearings in June with its full findings. Thank you, staff is available to answer any questions you may have.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:45:34 · ≈ 1:45 PM

Thank You Mr. Bailey are there any questions at this point? Supervisor Williams

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction4:45:40 · ≈ 1:45 PM

it's not so much a question but go on to that The point I made earlier today is that if it is our strategy, if we embrace, I believe what's been outlined today as trying to maintain a status quo budget. Maintaining the status quo budget would involve us funding the deficits for our libraries and so while it is listed as an expansion request My argument is it's not really an expansion.

It is just maintaining the status quo, and it only arises from the fact that we have been giving one time monies to every year for the last three years in order to take care of the deficits on these categories.

4:46 – 4:526 turns

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction4:46:35 · ≈ 1:46 PM

Mr. Miyasato, is that

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:46:37 · ≈ 1:46 PM

your click?

CommentLee HellerProposed · by introduction4:46:38 · ≈ 1:46 PM

If I could add to that, Supervisor Hart, Chair Hart, that is exactly what I think we were leading up to is this is a one-time request again. We'll be back next year unless we deal with it as a permanent instead of the 3.5 million giving in libraries about 4.2 million that way it's not an annual ask or else next year we're going to be back to ask for additional $658,000 plus Maybe another 3% or whatever it may be for cost of living. So it is kind of a structural issue at this point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:13 · ≈ 1:47 PM

Chair, if you don't mind we just put up another slide that's not in your packet and that's just to give you an overview of what the board has done for libraries. And so Mr. Chapkin and Supervisor Williams are right Every year we were asked to fund on a one-time basis. And so in 17, 18 you see that's our per capita in the blue of almost $3.5 million and the green was the one time funding.

We increased, obviously a per capita because the population has increased. And the yellow is the board said we'd like to give more on an ongoing basis and so that was given. And then still more of the green of $90,000. And then this fiscal year again presentation was made. We had a small increase in the per capita based on the formula that ongoing money continued. And then there was some discussion about having the friends pay more and there was a formula that didn't come to bear. And so after the budget was passed, your board was asked to provide the filler and so you did of $200,000. So it's just to say yeah this is a recurring issue I just want to be clear though when The reason that it's been recurring is we've been hoping as well that the ad hoc would come back with a plan.

And so every year when we had these discussions, we said let's wait for the Ad Hoc Committee to come back with a plan. And once there is a plan, the board can have a discussion about its funding priorities and whether they want to fund that on a permanent basis. So it's both, it's that it is a continuing deficit but from a budgetary standpoint I just want to be clear It was always considered a one-time funding until we had a plan that's been presented in which time the board could have a discussion about it.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:48:56 · ≈ 1:48 PM

Thank you for that clarification. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.844:48:59 · ≈ 1:48 PM

Thank you. I just wanted to put the plan in context, we did have a library study and that was very helpful but it didn't really answer a lot of questions that we had about our unique model and I have found this ad hoc committee to be extremely valuable in helping us understand the different types of libraries that we have and the different services at each type So we don't have a one size fits, or every library no matter what size doesn't have to provide the same services. So I think we really worked hard to find greater efficiencies. I think we also realized too however that libraries are really a commitment to equity and even in this day of high technology where a lot of people have cell phones and computer access, a lot of people don't.

And libraries are really critical to kind of leveling the playing field for children especially, but people who are eager to learn English as a second language and people getting connected to services. So it was invaluable in helping us really lay this out and I would be remiss if I didn't recognize how hard Ryder has worked at this. Our zone administrators from the four main libraries put in a whole lot of extra time, way above and beyond anything they get paid for in their regular job.

And Legacy Works, I think did a superb job with George and Ryder overseeing them. And Darcelle Elliott also worked really hard to try to get us Moving forward, we still haven't completed our work on public-private partnerships and other sources of funding that might be available. And all of this goes mainly still to programming. We have again declining infrastructure as well that needs to be addressed at some point and improved technology. So we have made I think enormous strides and We've overcome a lot of suspicion, distrust, misunderstandings and I think we're working with the Library Advisory Committee and the Zone Administrators in the county and the cities.

We're getting all on the same page so we're much closer. I'd just like also to mention we didn't talk about it here but The Goleta Library has taken on this year new administrative responsibilities with Buelton and Solvang, in addition to becoming a library standing on its own feet. And then it's also working very hard to figure out how to provide services to Isla Vista and has come up with a really good plan for moving that forward.

Overall, if our budget situation weren't so uncertain given COVID we have made some tremendous strides and now I think we'll just have to hang on as Supervisor Williams suggests. I hope with looking at the one time funding is status quo. Thank you.

4:52 – 4:575 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:52:25 · ≈ 1:52 PM

Any other questions or comments from Santa Maria? Okay. Next is, excuse me we do have public comment for this item thank you. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:52:39 · ≈ 1:52 PM

Yes Chair Hart and members of the board we have eight requests to speak on the library services special issue and we have six letters to be read into the record and two requests to speak by phone. We're going to begin with Mayor Builton Holly Sierra to be followed by Betty Rose Gunn Trying to guess finances and the future is like looking in a crystal ball, almost impossible. There are however basic needs that still must be met. Libraries are one of those needs. Buelton is heavily invested in our library. We as the city invest more money per capita than most communities in Santa Barbara County to fund our library. We service not only residents of Buelton but many people in the surrounding area. We like every other community in this country have been hit hard financially while we are sheltering in place and keeping Santa Ana's Valley residents safe We will lose more than a million dollars in sales tax and TOT.

Buellton will continue to support our library. I'm asking that the Board of Supervisors continue their support as well as to provide our Buellton area with a service the city considers a basic essential need. Thank you, Holly Sierra, Mayor Buellton.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:53:50 · ≈ 1:53 PM

Thank You Mayor Sierra

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:53:54 · ≈ 1:53 PM

And next we will go to Betty Rose Gunn to be followed by Mary Housle Dear Supervisors, I am Betty Rose Gunn, the Santa Maria representative for the Library Advisory Board. I am here to advocate for increased spending for Santa Maria and its branches. Santa Maria Public Library has more branches and covers a larger geographical area than any other library system in our county. It contributes more tax dollars than any other library branch's communities. The libraries are at the heart of the community and provide Provides programs for all ages. There is story time for the younger children, homework assistance for the older children, books clubs and coloring clubs for adults.

And the computers are used by all age groups. I'm asking for equity so the branches receive a larger and more appropriate portion of our tax dollars. Even during the coronavirus crisis this is the time to step up and support more rather than less for services used and needed by the cross section of our communities. Thank you Betty Rose Gunn. Next, we will go to Mary Housel to be followed by Amelia M. Villegas.

Thank you for fully funding the county library branches in the current fiscal year so that all deficits were covered. I'm hopeful that you will continue to fund the deficits that remain after the 7.8 per capita in 2021. Funding the deficits for the branches will include an additional allocation of $658,664 Beyond the 7.8 per capita allocation of $3,540,085. As you know the Library Advisory Ad Hoc Committee and Zone Libraries met many times over the year to develop library standards. Excuse me.

My apologies. As you know, the Library Advisory Ad Hoc Committee and Zone Librarians met many times over the year to develop library standards covering staffing, open hours, collections programs, technology and facilities. Please notice that the libraries in unincorporated areas continue to be particularly below the standards created and it demonstrates that those areas have no other support from cities.

It is vital that the county find a way to address these inequities. In the unincorporated areas, please recognize the time and thought librarians put into the standards by funding them at the 641,978 requested. The City of Santa Maria is launching a bookmobile in July 2020 and has requested additional funding of 28,174 from the county for visits to Cosmelea-Sisquauk, Tanglewood, and the Santa Maria Bonita School midway between Santa Maria and Guadalupe.

These areas lie in unincorporated areas that Vehicle cannot visit without county funding. This cost would be additional funding to the zone, three requests and is not currently included in the budget requests. Historically libraries have been heavily used after economic downturns and high job loss which we are currently experiencing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Once libraries reopen from the pandemic Santa Barbara County residents will depend on them more than ever as their beacon of hope for computing and Wi-Fi connections.

Job hunting Preparation for the next school year and relief from social isolation. The county residents are depending on you to fully fund library deficits and keep libraries accessible and operating at full capacity, particularly post-pandemic. Sincerely, Mary Housel.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:57:34 · ≈ 1:57 PM

Thank you for that comment.

4:57 – 5:028 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:57:39 · ≈ 1:57 PM

We will now go to Emilia Villegas to be followed by Carol Greger. The community of Guadalupe, though small Excuse me. Continues to need its branch library having been born and raised in Guadalupe, I have a vested interest in seeing our library continue to support the residents both young and old in Guadeloupe. As the city's representative to the county's Library Advisory Committee, I have an even greater interest in saving our library as one of the branches without a city or county owned facility. I am pleased to report that the city has confirmed their commitment to providing monies towards for fiscal year 2021. Those funds are a plus, but the branch needs additional funding basically to just keep afloat. Right now the deficit is projected to be $28,809 for the upcoming year.

That amount is based on the 7.80 per capita. Additionally, funding is needed not only for the remaining amount to cover the annual rent, but also for the normal day-to-day expenses in keeping our branch open e.g., utilities, phone, staffing and administrative overhead. I'm requesting that the Board of Supervisors seriously consider increasing the per capita amount to $11.70. This additional $3.90 per capita is needed to keep just the status quo at our branch.

The library has been in Guadalupe for more than 70 plus years. I lived at the library as a child after school and during the summer months. Once we have seen ourselves through the current pandemic, the library will reopen. I hope that our residents don't see any drastic changes due to a lack of funding. Thank you for considering this sincere request to help retain our small branch here in Guadalupe.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role4:59:20 · ≈ 1:59 PM

Thank you for that comment.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:59:23 · ≈ 1:59 PM

We will now go to Carol Greger, to be followed by Kelly Hatchett. Let me introduce myself. My name is Carol Greger and I was appointed by Steve Lavinino to the SBCounty Library Advisory Committee for the current year. I also served as president and currently vice-president of the Friends of Orkut Library, working diligently to fundraise and write grants to supplement purchases of books and media materials for the Orkut Library.

To all members of the SBCounty Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the support you have demonstrated on behalf of the many libraries and branches in Santa Barbara County. We appreciate the difficult decisions that must be made for so many areas of the county. However through it all, you were able to help so many libraries last year reducing budgetary deficits.

As you know, the Orchid Library does not have a city to contribute funding and we pay very high rent each month. The Friends Group has doubled its funds for supplementing materials to the library because of the help you gave us in the last budget year. We have been able to continue services to the Orchid community. Would you believe that in 2018 we had 38,316 patrons visit the Orchid Library? In 2019 there were 48,354.

That's an increase in library visitors by 10,038 in one year. The library has become a community center that continues to grow. As you engage in the difficult conversations and decisions in the budget workshop, please consider the need for an Orchid Branch Library located in an unincorporated area. Without a funding increase, the Orchid Branch Library is facing a significant budget deficit of just over $100,000.

Based on the standards and benchmarks for our county libraries developed by the LAC ad hoc committee The Orchid Branch Library has the greatest need for personal collections and hours. We would be grateful to be able to serve our local community by meeting at least the minimum standards in this areas. Please take time to review the SB County Library's standards and benchmarks, and it will clear It will be clear where the need is for all main libraries and branches in the county. Thank you once more for your leadership and support for our SB County Main Libraries and Branches. Respectfully submitted Carol Greger.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:01:33 · ≈ 2:01 PM

Thank You Miss Greger

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:01:35 · ≈ 2:01 PM

And our final letter to be read into the record is Kelly Hatchett, and then we will go to the phone for Hess Milton and Lauren Trujillo. Dear supervisors, the Santa Barbara Public Libraries are essential to our community in this time of uncertainty knowing we can someday go to the places we love is what is keeping most of us going. One of those places in particular for myself and my children is the Montecito Library. The online resources provided by the library have been incredibly helpful with homeschooling both of my children This is such a tough time for all aspects of our community, but I urge you to keep the importance of the libraries in mind. I would imagine they are going to be needed more than ever when this is over. Thank you for all you do.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:02:17 · ≈ 2:02 PM

Thank you Ms. Hatchett.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:02:21 · ≈ 2:02 PM

And now we will go to the phone for Hess Milton to be followed by Lauren Trujillo.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:02:39 · ≈ 2:02 PM

We're going to start calling you that. I'm just going to start calling you Hess Milton from now on.

5:03 – 5:109 turns

CommentMelt HessProposedself-stated5:03:15 · ≈ 2:03 PM

Chair Hart and members of the board, good afternoon. My name is Melt Hess and I'm chair of the Santa Barbara Library Board and I'm Santa Barbara's representative on the county's library advisory committee. Thank you for your ongoing support for our public libraries. I'd like to speak briefly about what a librarian does when the library has to close its doors for a few months.

The pandemic closed the Zone 1 libraries on March 13th But just as during the Thomas Fire, the Santa Barbara Library staff has stepped up beyond their traditional roles to respond to the emergent need. Starting almost immediately, Director Jessica Cadiente and her professional staff created innovative programs to support the community during shelter-in-place. And here are just three examples.

With a program called SBDL Delivers, each cardholder can request that the four books be mailed to their home The Public Library Foundation, San Barbara Public Library Foundation is funding the postage and so far over 1,000 bundles have been sent to cardholders in Santa Barbara, Carpinteria and Montecito comprising over 4,000 items. Next item, the library has created virtual story times using GoToMeeting and providing access to Baby and Me, Wiggly Story Time, Preschool Story Time and more. And then finally, with SBPL Works, the program for helping job seekers, library staff are offering bilingual phone and video conference appointments to support residents seeking jobs.

I should mention that Santa Barbara City Libraries are serving the entire Zone 1 at this time as no staff are reporting to Carpinteria or Montecito. Regrettably, the libraries have to release its hourly workers In addition to the hardship this causes to the workers, it adds to the challenges ahead in sheltering places lifted and we work to resume our former lives. So in conclusion I encourage you to keep in mind the importance of libraries to our community and especially the inspiring response that our libraries have during this crisis.

So I thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:05:37 · ≈ 2:05 PM

Thank you Mr. Hess. Thank you for your many years of volunteer work on behalf of libraries.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:05:46 · ≈ 2:05 PM

We will now go to Lauren Trujillo on the phone and we had two additional requests to have letters read into the record.

PresenterLauren TrujilloSanta Barbara Public Library FoundationProposedself-stated5:06:31 · ≈ 2:06 PM

Hello, good afternoon Chair Hart and members of the Board. My name is Lauren Trujillo and I'm the Foundation Director of the Santa Barbara Public Library Foundation. Hello?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:06:43 · ≈ 2:06 PM

Yes, Lauren we can hear you clearly.

PresenterLauren TrujilloSanta Barbara Public Library FoundationProposedself-stated5:06:45 · ≈ 2:06 PM

Okay, should I start now? Yep. Okay. Good afternoon Chair Hart and members of the Board. My name is Lauren Trujillo and I'm the Foundation Director of the Santa Barbara Public Library Foundation The Santa Barbara Public Library Foundation supports the Santa Barbara Public Library by funding large-scale initiatives that are not included in the annual operating budget, like our children's library.

The Santa Barbara Public Library, like other Santa Barbara emergencies as Milt mentioned, has been a second responder to the community. The Santa Barbara Public Library is stepping up for the community through a variety of educational resources serving children, families, seniors Those feeling isolated, the unsheltered and local business owners. Even virtually, the library creates a community where all are welcome no matter your age, interests or background. You can explore new passions, find solace, discover who you are through the library's varied array of free materials, programs and services. I'll share two additional things that the Santa Barbara Public Library is offering right now that Milt didn't mention.

Virtual book clubs, job assistance in English and Spanish, how-to videos on applying for unemployment in English and Spanish, poetry readings on the library's YouTube channel, curating at home science and technology kits for parents, checking out Wi-Fi hotspots. And the student success cards have just been activated with giving cards to thousands of Santa Barbara Unified School District students.

Their student IT will now work as an SVPL. library card, both in and outside of our service area in the city. And Santa Barbara Public Library or SVPL Deliveries as Milton mentioned is a book mailing program for patrons during this time that can have their recorders delivered to them at home. This program is proudly funded by the Santa Barbara Public Library Foundation and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed5:08:44 · ≈ 2:08 PM

all

PresenterLauren TrujilloSanta Barbara Public Library FoundationProposedself-stated5:08:45 · ≈ 2:08 PM

of this is happening with limited city library staff who are reporting to work to serve all these residents during this crisis. The library is a vital resource for our community now and will be a vital resource as we begin to think about recovery. As you consider the budget for our community libraries, it's important to understand that Santa Barbara Public Library is supporting tens of thousands of people living in the county outside of city limits. SVPL is also providing all services to Montecito and Carp residents that they provide to the city libraries during their closure while those two county branches are completely shut down.

And crisis aside, SDPL already serves a large percentage of Santa Barbara Public Library Colorado voters who use the central branch services but live in areas like Goleta and pay taxes for the Goleta library. The Santa Barbara Public Library serves more of the community on a budget that becomes more limiting every year and does not receive the tax support they need. In comparison to other communities in our state $7.80 per capita is embarrassing Santa Barbara deserves better, particularly as our city library supports its branches in Montecito and Carpentria. The Board of Supervisors needs to recognize where it's needed. The county branches deserve support but the City Library tax per capita increase is long overdue. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:10:04 · ≈ 2:10 PM

Thank you Minister Keough. Thank you for your help with the Public Library Foundation. It makes a huge difference to the services that can be provided.

5:10 – 5:167 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:10:14 · ≈ 2:10 PM

And Chair Hart, members of the board we did have two additional letters to be read into the record. I'm going to begin with Laurel Hart to be followed by Sue Carter. Hello during this challenging time our public libraries are as crucial a public service as ever. We dearly hope that county will continue the same amount of funding for the Santa Barbara Public Libraries as was present before the crisis. Thank you Laurel Hart.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:10:37 · ≈ 2:10 PM

Thank You Ms. Hart

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:10:39 · ≈ 2:10 PM

And our last request to speak on this item is Sue Carter. Dear Board of Supervisors, our libraries are an important part of our community. My grandchildren and the whole family love going to choose books. It's a really big event for them. I know that some of the smaller branches have to work hard to raise enough money to provide the services that the county does not provide. Please include the library in your budget. Thank you, Sue Carter.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:11:04 · ≈ 2:11 PM

Thank you, Ms. Carter. That concludes our public comments. Are there any other questions or comments board members want to make on this special issue area? Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:11:17 · ≈ 2:11 PM

Let's see, excuse me. I also wanted to acknowledge Natasha who has handled all the logistics which isn't the easiest thing with so many busy people coming from throughout the county and to make an offer if the libraries, if there is anybody who needs a supervisor for story time or to talk about county government or favorite children's books, I'm available and I bet some of my other colleagues might as well.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:11:45 · ≈ 2:11 PM

Thank you for that generous offer. Supervisor Williams?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:11:49 · ≈ 2:11 PM

Yeah, I guess I have to say well so if the library wants me to do Lord of the Rings story time, I'm happy to do that. Actually, I've got a couple things that might be appropriate for younger readers. Of course my idea more appropriate for younger readers is The Hobbit also by Tolkien or Harry Potter. But no, I volunteer as well as a reader for any age group that the libraries are interested in having me do.

This library's funding has been drying up for a long time, and it really has more to do with the aftermath of the Great Recession and the budgetary changes that the state made. It was relatively small percentages. The state contributed, but it was enough to keep us afloat. After that went away the libraries skated for a good four or five years on their accumulated reserves and then You know we're really trying to figure out how to adapt.

You know the board tasked the ad hoc with a plan. We do have a plan but it involves money and no revenue source That's where I hope we go someday. In the interim, I do think that we at very minimum need to have the deficits included in the recommended budget and consider as part of all the other things that we consider in expansion requests libraries You know, I think Given the day that we are looking at and the budget we're looking at it. I do think we're also going to have to be creative and thoughtful about ways to make more than a million dollars of expansion requests possible because that I You know, us as colleagues against each other in a way. So I hope we can avoid that by looking at this in the next couple months. Of course if we don't get any help from the state we may even be in a worse situation so I would also say one of the takeaways from today is And from our last couple of public health discussions is, I would urge that we in our communications with the state add some urgency to look.

We've been left out of the aid package, right? Our equivalent of the aid package would be something like 35 million bucks which We pretty much take care of a lot of the problems that we're looking at here today, but we don't have it. And so we're left out of the aid package and there's several changes going on at the state that could deprive us of further monies. Ironically one of those ones that could deprive public health $6 million a year.

I think that's something that we really need to highlight and kind of go, hey, we're trying to execute the directives that you've given us but we don't have the money to execute those directives unless we are able to get some more help.

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:16 – 5:319 turns

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:16:06 · ≈ 2:16 PM

Well, thank you. Thank you to the work of the ad hoc committee. I know this took a lot of meetings and collaboration and discussion and creativity, and we appreciate the work that you have done. And it hopefully will survive in some form through potential

The next item is the Long Range Planning Division's 2020-2023 Work Program.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed5:18:01 · ≈ 2:18 PM

Good afternoon, members of the board. I have Dan Clemon here who's the Deputy Director of Long Range Planning and he's going to work with me on the presentation today but I'm going to give the bulk of the presentation.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:18:14 · ≈ 2:18 PM

Thank you Ms. Clemon. Mr. Clement?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed5:18:17 · ≈ 2:18 PM

So just to start, we're returning to the board after our meeting on March 24th where we looked at the work program and the board made some requests for us to do some additional analysis and then come back with additional information. This slide is really just to sort of set the stage so you understand what the responsibilities are of long-range planning We have two teams that are each led by a supervising planner and then four planners on each team. And so it's really more, I'm not expecting to read the whole thing but just to give you an idea of the scope of the work that the staff is undertaking on an annual basis.

So in our previous meeting, we laid out what the work program entailed. And we have four and a half FTEs or employees, full-time employees for required services and operations. And those things are the basics that just have to be done in the division. including responsible agency review and trainings and meetings, et cetera. And then we have six-and-a-half FTEs available for the bulk of the work that the board directs, right?

And of those programs, we've got six that are mandated projects, and those are things like general plan amendments that we would be required to do. We have ten board-directed projects We have one privately initiated one, which is the SoCal Gas one. And then of all those projects we've got two that are currently grant funded and two applications pending. So in our initial work program, we asked for two additional project managers for the division. But we recognize obviously in this current climate that's potentially a challenge for the board to be able to provide those resources. But if we can't have those resources, we have to look at other options and that includes delaying some projects that were originally included in our work program because we had more work than we do staffing.

So this is a chart just to give you an idea of the project timelines for each of them. It also gives you an idea, the green highlights are where we are using consultants in the process and so you can see that we already use consultants quite a bit in our process to allow staff to endeavor to process more programs through the system. So the board's request was, would one-time funding for consultants allow the division to complete all of the projects in the work program?

What we did is returned with quite a bit of analysis. This gives you a picture of the projects that we currently have consultants for. Nine of these programs are already underway and two are pending. We have six projects where we do not currently have consultants involved. And five of those are underway and they include the ADU ordinance amendments, those which bring us in conformance with the state requirements. The cannabis ordinance amendments that are board directed. The coastal resiliency LCP amendments which were at the tail end The annual ordinance amendment package that we process every year to keep our ordinances current and fix any issues that we see coming up. And we have quite a long list of items that a variety of either the planning commissioner or the board, or members of the public, or staff have identified.

And then we have the changes to our programs and ordinances based on the changes that have been happening at state level with respect to housing, including State Density Bonus and Housing Accountability Act, those types of things. And then we have one pending where we weren't currently using consultants and sets for short-term rentals in the coastal zoning ordinance. So these were the five, I'm sorry six that we looked at as where you could possibly use consultants.

When we're looking at this question of whether or not consultants will allow us to do everything that's in our work program, it's important for the board to understand that it's the project managers that we need to help us move these additional programs through. So consultants can help us with that but they only take up a portion of the projects. There are still substantial staff resources that are needed to manage those programs So some of the tasks that we look at when we're looking to see if consultants can be helpful in a particular program or project. And those things are public outreach, research, drafting of the ordinances, technical studies and environmental documents.

So what we determined was that there are two programs that we don't already have consultants on where it would make sense to be able to use them. And those include adding consultant services to help us with objective design standards for housing, ministerial housing and that's part of the state housing and density bonus law amendments and then also with short term rentals in the coastal zone.

So this gives you an idea of where we are in the process for state housing density bonus law amendments. We're about 7% complete, we have undertaken that already but we can use the consultants for these objective design standards. What that does is it frees up some staffing that we could move to another program. It's about two FTEs worth. The cost of the overall project increases from about 505,000 to roughly 534. And there's no estimated change in the completion date of those program amendments.

With respect to short-term rentals, we have not initiated that. But we could use them to help us develop the ordinance, do some public outreach and maybe assist us with hearings. And with the help of a consultant, we could reduce the staff allocation by 0.2 FTEs and the cost increase is from 183 roughly to 202,000. And again there's no change in the estimated completion date.

So with that analysis, what we would recommend is that we, with the 6.5 FTEs that we have, is that we need those for the ongoing mandated and grant funded projects but with the freed up FTEs which totals about .4 so almost a half FTE And the use of the consultant services for the housing law updates and the coastal STRs, which are a cost of roughly $125,000 together. We could add two of the projects we were going to have to delay.

So we can add farm stays and short-term rentals. That is if we add consultants. That's our recommendation, and we know that utility-grade solar was a really important program but it takes .8 FTE so it's a heavy lift for staff. But I'm going to walk through some options for you so the board has a full range of options before them. So the option one is our original presentation to the board, which is adding two staff.

And if some point that seems viable in the future once we understand what COVID impacts to our finances at the county then we would look to the board to go ahead and fulfill those if it's possible. That results in the long term expansion of our capacity and moving projects through. The option two is what I just laid out, which is advanced consultant services with the state housing law and the STR's.

The short-term rentals and farm stays to our work program, in addition to things that are already mandated ongoing and grant funded. We would have to identify two FTEs worth of projects to delay. And our recommendation under option 2 is you delay the ag tiered permitting ordinance amendments, utility grade solar ordinance amendments, and then the annual zoning ordinance package that we process.

As I mentioned earlier, the total cost of this option is $125,000 of one-time consultant fees. And this is a short term expansion of our resources in the division. This just as a timeline to give you an idea How it changes the timing for these projects that would be delayed. So you can see in red, we have ag tiered permitting, utility grade solar and the annual zoning ordinance amendments. And they would be shifted to the next fiscal year so year two of our three-year work program.

Option three, this is a situation where we don't have consultant money. And we can't expand staffing because the board could find themselves in that position. So we wanted to make sure you had an option for that. This gives you an option under A, where we would reduce our staffing allocation to the state density bonus and housing law ordinance amendment package by 0.3 FTEs. We would continue working on it but just not as we wouldn't apply as many resources to it We would delay ag-tiered permitting, utility grade solar and the annual zoning ordinance amendments.

That's option A. That gives us two FTEs that we need. Option B, this allows the utility grade solar to go forward but what you do is we reduce the staffing on the housing law by the same amount, we delay farm stays We delay ag-tiered permitting. We delay short term rentals and we delay the annual zoning ordinance amendments, and that gives you two FTEs. We could work on some combination of those two if the board was unhappy with these options but we think these are the most viable options for the board to consider.

And this graphic gives you option A Which shows you the delay for ag-tiered permitting here. State density housing law, utility grade solar and annual zoning ordinance amendment. So this is where we have no money, we don't have additional consultant money and we don't have new staffing. And B under those circumstances delays ag tiered permitting farm stays short term rentals. The changes resulting from state housing law and our annual ordinance amendments.

So in conclusion, we presented the three options before you today including our original one which added two new project managers. We have one that allows one-time consultant funding that allows us to add farmstays And short-term rentals in the coastal zone. And then, the third is that where we're funding constrained for both either the expansion or consultants.

I'm happy to answer any questions.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:30:12 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Thank you Ms. Plowman. Any questions for staff? Supervisor Williams.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:30:20 · ≈ 2:30 PM

No questions but I'll wait for a public comment.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:30:22 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Okay. Does anyone else have any questions? Do we have any public comments?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:30:29 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have three requests to speak by phone. And we will begin with Joe Armaderez to be followed by Renee O'Neill. Thank you. All right, I cannot get a hold of Joe at this time. So we'll go to Renee O'Neill to be followed by Mark Shatillo.

5:32 – 5:387 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed5:32:19 · ≈ 2:32 PM

Good afternoon, Supervisors. Before the break Mr. Frafwell commented on how important it is to resist the temptation to make short-term decisions that will have long term ramifications. As you know one of my main concerns is the long term negative ramifications that the cannabis industry is having countywide Supervisor Williams commented that cannabis revenue may be what's faced us through this economic crisis. I disagree.

The majority of growers either don't pay taxes or claim they did not make a profit. I've seen this over and over again. We've also seen the costly time consuming consequences that imprudent short term decisions and loose cannabis regulations have created countywide Therefore, I'm strongly advocating for the one-time use funds to be allocated to the departments that manage cannabis permits and enforcement. Our County Planning Department and our Sheriff's Enforcement team are doing their best to identify and enforce on the corrupt actors. Both are doing an amazing job considering the limited number of staff they have compared to the number of cannabis permits in process and that are in the pipeline We urge our supervisors to support all efforts that Planning and Development, Sheriff's Planning Commission and County residents are making in an effort to shove Pandora back into her box and support responsible cannabis.

You can help us do this by denying permits to growers that have lied on their affidavits expanded after 2016 and are operating illegally Please don't reward the corrupt players. We don't want our future generations to have read or hear stories about their legacy and how it was destroyed by short term decisions that will have long-term negative ramifications.

Please do something to protect the future generations of our county. On a closing note, I just want to thank our county's efforts In keeping us updated on the coronavirus. Thank you, Supervisor Hart. I watch your programs and I heartily approve of maintaining the shelter in place order as we are now witnessing an escalation in China after they relaxed their orders. This is not the right time to add fuel to the COVID fire. Thank you for listening.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:35:05 · ≈ 2:35 PM

Thank you, Ms O'Neill

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:35:09 · ≈ 2:35 PM

And we will now go to our last speaker, Mark Shintello.

CommentMark ShintelloProposed5:35:42 · ≈ 2:35 PM

Good afternoon, members of the board. This is Mark Shatillo and I appreciate your guys working under these conditions. I've been following along for much of the discussion and it's noting the reliance that the county has on cannabis revenues. I want to urge the board to find a path to identify permittable projects that don't create agricultural conflicts and don't cause odors to residences Residential areas. There's 3 pieces to this process that I would urge you to move forward on one of the ordinance which the Planning Commission advanced to you separating out the Inland Coastal Conditional Use Permits for immediate action, thereby creating a process that's going to have greater integrity and so it decisions that will not require appeal and then bifurcating out the coastal conditional use permit at the odor issues or swift processing, but those involve more staff time.

Secondly addressing the expanded nonconforming uses where some growers have expanded the scope of their use beyond what they had acting in 2016. Those growers should be assigned to the penalty box and put at the end of the queue for the third piece, the permitting, where we're trying to segregate the good projects from the bad. There are a number of substantive issues that you're aware of in addressing these projects, but the process issues you may not be aware of. There is very limited public engagement in these permits and information is available at the very last minute. In fact there's still information we've requested for permits that we've had to appeal. We still don't have the basic project description information So we would urge your board to dedicate the resources and the attention, and your agenda time if you're going to rely on cannabis as a significant income source going forward.

To ensure that you can have an orderly permit process that rewards the projects that don't conflict with surrounding uses and offer the kinds of industry that we want to support here in the county. And send the ones that are problematic onto a longer review process. It is a critical path issue for the board, and we urge you to fix this broken process and to allocate the staff or resources that are necessary to effectuate those changes to the extent that you're relying on them so heavily.

Briefly, the other elements associated with option three appear to be ill-advised Simply because they're deferring action on items that should be completed in order for us to be able to turn the corner after the pandemic. So thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the commission, members of the supervisors. I appreciate the opportunity to give you my input.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:38:44 · ≈ 2:38 PM

Thank you, Mr. Chateau. I think that concludes our public comments.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:38:49 · ≈ 2:38 PM

Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board. That was our final speaker,

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:38:52 · ≈ 2:38 PM

Supervisor Williams.

5:38 – 5:418 turns

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:38:56 · ≈ 2:38 PM

Well, it won't surprise any of you that I believe strongly that we would be penny wise and pound foolish. That is we would be saving a relatively small amount of money in order to lose a larger amount of money when we actually have projects and revenue if we did not go forward on the utility scale solar ordinance. And the farm stay ordinance in particular, and so My preferred option would be option one, which is to provide the funds to planning to pursue the projects through hiring the employees necessary. We continue to ask P&D to work harder and faster and I do that as much as any of you, probably more.

And we can't just do that in a vacuum, we need to have adequate staffing. And I hope that we could approve that.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:40:04 · ≈ 2:40 PM

Other comments from other board members? Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:40:11 · ≈ 2:40 PM

When this came up last time, I wanted to see it in the context of the larger budget but at this point I agree with option one and Supervisor Williams as well if there's any way we can do

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:40:29 · ≈ 2:40 PM

Any other comments from Santa Maria?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:40:33 · ≈ 2:40 PM

I have kind of a generalized wrap up, but I don't have any specific comment on this subject.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:40:44 · ≈ 2:40 PM

Okay, thank you Supervisor.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:40:47 · ≈ 2:40 PM

Yeah, I still support option one, but I want to see the entire budget still.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:41:01 · ≈ 2:41 PM

I think that is our dilemma for everything today. We do need some context to make decisions, but there's strong support for giving you the staff that you need to do this work and move this as fast as possible. We'll just have to see how things evolve over the next couple of months. Any other comments or anything on this particular item? If not we can go to board questions of individual department budgets Or directly to board deliberation and comment.

Any general comments? Folks have been making comments as we've gone through the process. CEO Miyasato, do you have something?

5:41 – 5:5116 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:41:45 · ≈ 2:41 PM

No just as you deliberate and if you give us any final comments or directions. So what we heard today was at least two members of the board had talked about wanting to fill the library's deficit so that's $600,000 or so with cannabis revenue because that's what we're doing So my plan is that the recommended budget we come back to you with, unless things have changed would be similar to what we're providing today and the board can make those decisions at the hearing. But if you want that to be included in the recommended budget Knowing there's a risk when we come back in June or further, I'd like you to give me that direction today. Secondly on this issue with P&D and ongoing FTEs same issue. I hear there's some support for it but if there's a status quo budget means that there's no additions so if there's going to be an addition I need to find out if there's areas the board would like me to look at reducing or cutting.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:42:47 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Matters

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:42:48 · ≈ 2:42 PM

to the Board, Supervisor Williams. Well I mean if it's agreeable to my colleagues then I would propose a directive to the extent feasible for staff to include the library deficit And the long-term planning staff in the recommended June budget. All right, is that a

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:43:23 · ≈ 2:43 PM

motion? Can I weigh in on that for a little bit? Yes. That's a motion. Is there a second for the motion?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:43:33 · ≈ 2:43 PM

I will second it. I'm not sure I'll vote for it yet but I'll second it for discussion purposes.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:43:38 · ≈ 2:43 PM

Supervisor Lavenino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:43:41 · ≈ 2:43 PM

Well, I'm not going to support it only because of one reason. And that is this was really the only, we broke out two items. We broke out libraries and we broke out long range because we wanted to hear more about them and now I'm more educated about them and I'd be able to make a decision better later. But we didn't hear from every other department head and Libraries and long range planning are two areas that we need to address.

But I'm sure every department has one or two issues that they feel that are just as important. And so I find it hard in a time when we are, when everything's so uncertain. In the best case that our CEO is telling us is that she's told folks that they're going to get a status quo budget. That we would pull a couple of items out and try to fix those instead of looking at the budget as a whole. So I might vote for those in June but I'm going to withhold my vote now and just, Some of our priorities, but I know the sheriff's got issues. I know fire's got, probation's got issues, social services has it. Everybody's got things that they want to fix and they just didn't have the opportunity or the time. Just like I don't think it was a wise thing to do that we would break each department out right now because it's so unknown.

But I'm going to reserve my list for Jim.

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:45:11 · ≈ 2:45 PM

I would just ask one question, why does libraries get to be singled out as the only entity that we're not trying to protect their status quo budget for? That is just not consistent. It's just that they have We have been categorizing the funding that we've been giving them for the last three years as one-time expenditures. And so they will be singled out Trying to protect their status quo. In fact, this recommendation today takes the funding that they were getting in previous years from the marijuana tax and puts it to other departments to take care of their deficits. And so I guess maybe if we want to be really consistent and just do status quo, then I would instead make a motion just for backfilling the deficits for libraries. But I just don't see any reason why we're backfilling everybody else's deficit but not the library's.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:46:32 · ≈ 2:46 PM

Mr. Chair?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:46:33 · ≈ 2:46 PM

Supervisor

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:46:34 · ≈ 2:46 PM

Adam? It might be helpful for me Give you this little document that I've been working on all day. Because this discussion highlights the problem that I've always had with the budgets here, so if you don't mind I'll just give you my wrap

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:46:55 · ≈ 2:46 PM

up. Please do, this is perfect timing.

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:46:58 · ≈ 2:46 PM

Thank you. I have asked several times during my tenure here for this board to go through the exercise of actually writing down a number next to each list of items that we currently fund. If we were to do that, it would make it easier for our CEO to put together a budget. However, apparently that's not going to happen. So we are left with our CEO trying to divine our intent from comments made from the dias at various times and maybe that's not so bad. She throws something in for everybody in such a way as to avoid any real fights.

Truly it is one of her best talents. I feel a duty on behalf of those I represent to at least say the following, excluding mandatory services and required general fund contributions that safety and maintenance should be our top two priorities. In my fantasy world, All general fund spending should be eliminated per a specific inclusive list of priorities prescribed by this board.

CEO builds a budget by starting at the bottom, eliminating the general fund contribution and proceeds up the list until the budget balances after fully funding safety departments including public works and addressing deferred and current maintenance in a realistic way, By eliminating the backlog in some reasonable amount of time, which we could agree on potentially.

I would get much more aggressive about managing our financial position in this budget. Other suggestions for consideration before our next budget hearing would be to find non-essential areas within our budget that we fund more generously than comparable counties and come back with potential cuts. Review cuts contemplated in the last crisis that were restored.

Begin discussions with labor groups about making a plan to avoid layoffs by deferring future increases or agreeing to temporary pay cuts. And ask KPMG to review our pension program within the context of our potential solvency. Differently stated, how much can you spend on the pension given mandates before you can no longer function as a county? God forbid we have another black swan visited on us such as a devastating fire or another mud slide or who knows what else on top of COVID.

We're tapped out. This is a run to failure, pray for a miracle budgeting process and I never liked it in the best of times. And under the current circumstances, it's absolutely irrational. The next year should be a hoot. I will be gratefully watching from the cheap seats.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:50:00 · ≈ 2:50 PM

Thank you Supervisor Adam. It is a challenging moment and my view is that there has been a lot We're at the departments and the CEO staff to produce this document, but unfortunately in light of what's occurring as we speak it is probably ultimately a historical document. And it would describe what might have been and hopefully what we will get back to. But in the meantime, the process of getting from here to there requires us to make some decisions and to move the process forward or we will have nothing to start with.

In June and react to that the state does in May. So I personally agree with Supervisor Williams' view of separating the two items that he originally combined, and putting the library funding on an even playing field with the other department ongoing expenditures. And then we'll just see where we have to go from there. So if your motion was to separate out the library funding from the additional planning staff, and if that is acceptable to the seconder, if there's not any more discussion, we could vote on that? If there's discussion, Supervisor Williams?

CommentClementeProposed · by introduction5:51:15 · ≈ 2:51 PM

No, that's agreeable to me as the maker of the motion.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:51:18 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Okay. I guess we need a roll call vote.

5:51 – 5:5626 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:51:26 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Mr. Adams?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:51:28 · ≈ 2:51 PM

No.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:51:29 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Mr. Lavinino?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:51:30 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:51:33 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Mr. Williams?

CommentBetty Rose GunnProposed · by introduction5:51:34 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:51:35 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:51:37 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Aye

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:51:38 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Motion passes 4-1 I

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:51:42 · ≈ 2:51 PM

think that unless there are other comments you know it probably is helpful to Yes,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:51:48 · ≈ 2:51 PM

Supervisor Lavinino So this is hard because just Supervisor Adam and I sitting here We're listening. But I disagree with the interpretation of where we're at right now. You know, I think that we have spent the last, well since Mona's been here, I think we've prepared ourselves to get ready for a day like today and a month like today and a year like today. If you look over our, yes our maintenance backlog is growing as it has been.

And when you look at what our pension costs might be next year if you've looked at recently the markets have bounced back considerably from what they were down originally six, eight weeks ago. So we don't know what that's going to look like at the end of the year. But just as the county in general, our finances are so much and have us in so much better position to be prepared for an event like this today with our strategic reserve at the highest it's ever been.

I think most of our contingency accounts Are higher than they've ever been, so there's never a good time to have a situation like this. But I don't want people to feel like we're grasping at straws and we're praying for a miracle because that's not the case We have prepared ourselves for something like this. Now, obviously we can't sustain just like no business can sustain a huge layoff of no work until October, November, December.

But I'm confident that we'll get through this, we'll be back to work, Thank you. Fourth quarter, Hail Mary pass everybody's throwing. It's just right now it's difficult to go through a budget and try to determine with any reasonableness and with any type of certainty what it's going to look like. We don't know but I think by June we will so that's what I got to say.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:54:27 · ≈ 2:54 PM

Thank you, Supervisor Lavinino. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:54:30 · ≈ 2:54 PM

I just wanted to thank our most senior member of the board, Supervisor Lavinino for that context and I very much agree with it, want to align with it. Thank you.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:54:40 · ≈ 2:54 PM

And I want to go back to a comment that Supervisor Williams said earlier about how we, the county has been left out of the federal assistance package and that is something hopefully that will be corrected in the future They were certainly the first effort to trying to get emergency funding to local governments to assist. And it seems only more than equitable and fair that we would also have additional assistance from the federal government and the state government, and that would make a big difference in what we're looking at in June.

Are there other comments or questions? I heard a click. Is there, was that Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:55:26 · ≈ 2:55 PM

Chair Hart, members of the board. We have one final business item before we adjourn today and that is for the board to take action on recommendations A through D as a part of departmental item number two from the county executive office to consider recommendations regarding fiscal year 2020-2021 budget development workshops and that could be found on page five of our agenda today.

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:55:51 · ≈ 2:55 PM

Well thank you very much with that We are adjourned until.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:55:59 · ≈ 2:55 PM

So if I may make a motion of staff's recommended actions, A through D in our board letter?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:56:09 · ≈ 2:56 PM

I'll second. Motion has been made and seconded. Any discussion? Roll call vote please.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:56:15 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:56:15 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:56:19 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Mr. Lavinino?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:56:21 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:56:21 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:56:22 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:56:22 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedChairProposed · by role5:56:24 · ≈ 2:56 PM

Aye With that we are adjourned until Tuesday, April 21st 2020 Thank you

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen