BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 16, 2020

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:0816 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56 · ≈ 9:03 AM

I will call to order the June 16th, 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Will the clerk please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:03 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:06 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:07 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr. Lavagnino? Here! Mr. Williams? Here Ms. Hartman? Here Chair

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Hart? Here At this time please stand and join the board in pledging allegiance to the flag

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:27 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Next item of business is approval of the minutes June 2nd meeting as well as the June 9th and 11th budget hearings. Is there any discussion? Move approval. Thank you. Is there a second? Second.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:57 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Motion has been made and seconded. Any discussion? Would the clerk please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:02 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Mr. Adam?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.855:04 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:05 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.855:07 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:07 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Mr Williams? Aye Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:12 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:12 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:14 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Thank you CEO Miyasato, is there a CEO report today?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:18 · ≈ 9:05 AM

Chair Hart and board members, there is just two announcements this morning. And it's really to discuss some upcoming deadlines for us. So there will be six virtual community meetings regarding cannabis retail storefronts. And those will begin July 1 and we'll be holding them every Wednesday and Thursday for three consecutive weeks after that. In addition, there will be a video preview that will be available by the end of this week And we're asking members of the public to preview that video when it's available. The public can submit questions or comments in advance and during the virtual meetings, and again there will be one meeting per community plan area where cannabis retail storefront may be allowed.

Staff from the CEO's office and planning and development will be present And to provide an overview of licensing and permitting followed by an overview of the community plan area with maps. So again, the outreach video will be posted by the end of this week and the web page will have all the dates and locations for the plan areas for the virtual meetings. Again these will all be virtual.

The second announcement is discussing our Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission. As you recall, in November 28 in the general election voters approved Measure G that establishes an 11-person County of Santa Barbara Independent Redistricting Commission to adjust the boundaries of the Supervisorial Districts. Santa Barbara County residents interested in serving as a member of that Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission will have until The application and selection process is designed to produce a commission that is independent from the influence of the Board of Supervisors, political parties, campaign contributors or other special interests and is reasonably representative of the county's diversity.

The commission must complete adoption of the redistricting plan within six months of receiving the final 2020 census data, but not later than the requirements of the California Elections Code. Currently, the U.S. Census Bureau is required to deliver census data to the jurisdictions by March 31st. However due to the COVID pandemic Congress could vote to extend the deadline by several months barring no delay or change In the federal census schedule, the redistricting process will be completed by August or September 2021. Again, the most important date for us is that by August 21st of 2020 will be the deadline to apply and all information will be on our website by this at the end of this week.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:07 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Thank you CEO Miyasato. Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?

0:08 – 0:1210 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed8:13 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, I just have a couple quick announcements this morning. My first announcement is that I would like to remind members of the public who are participating in our hearing this morning remotely there are alternative methods to participate in public comment you can participate by phone as you will see scrolling on the top of your TV screen here momentarily Please call area code 805-568-2240. State your name, your phone number and which item you'd like to speak on and we will call you at the appropriate time.

And just a friendly reminder please make every effort to be available and mute all streaming devices on your end when you are called. Additionally, we posted an addendum to our agenda for today Tuesday June 16th 2020 adding administrative item number 71 this is from the clerk recorder assessor It is to consider recommendations regarding the Los Olivos Community Services District, request for consolidation with the statewide general election and change to even-numbered year elections for Board of Directors.

And my final announcement this morning just a little housekeeping item on Administrative Item A17. This is from Community Services District It is to consider recommendations regarding the approval of the action plan substantial amendment and execution of agreements with the Housing Authority of Santa Barbara County and Legal Aid Foundation to implement an emergency rental assistance program utilizing Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus CDBG-CV and Home Investment Partnerships, home funds. And just an announcement to the board and That the agenda and recommendations remain the same as well as the noticing for this item. But the attachments that were posted on this item last week were incorrect, but have now been corrected for the board and the public.

So that's all my announcements this morning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed10:10 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Thank you Madam Clerk. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8510:13 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair, this is a question for the CEO with the report on the cannabis retail. You listed various county parties that'll be involved I hope the supervisors offices in whose district the community plan area is will also play a role?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role10:30 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Supervisors we can certainly do that again. We just said this was the CEOs and planning will be presenting an overview of the licensing and permitting, but if you'd like the Individual board offices to be available and also answer questions from the community Again, we're trying to whatever the whatever is the most efficient way into helpful to the community. That's fine Excuse me Yes supervisor Adam

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:00 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Calling in from the colonies, I'm wondering how that would work if we were involved in that process up front and then an appeal came to us. Would we have to recuse ourselves having taken a position previously being involved in those processes or would that just get

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed11:25 · ≈ 9:11 AM

ignored? Chair and Supervisors, this is an area where there are really two items both of which I think can be overcome. The first is just to make sure that we don't have more than two supervisors present at any of these meetings so that we're forming a quorum of the board outside a notice meeting. And the second really the test that we've talked with you about before is not becoming personally embroiled with a topic that the board might later hear in its quasi-judicial role So being present, listening to the public and even speaking as long as we're not advocating for or against particular applicants would not be at the level of personal employment. And I'd be glad to talk with supervisors individually if there's further questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:09 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you very much for that help.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed12:12 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:13 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you Supervisor Adam.

The next item is approval of the administrative agenda. Do any board members request to pull any items on the administrative agenda?

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed12:24 · ≈ 9:12 AM

I need to pull item one, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:26 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Thank you Supervisor Adam. I'd like to pull item 39 and 55. Any others? Okay will the clerk please read item 1 into the record.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed12:42 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, I do also additionally have two requests from the public on items A1 and A27. We will begin with administrative item number one. This is from Supervisor Williams and Supervisor Hart, it is an honorary resolution to adopt a resolution recognizing Friday June 19th 2020 as Juneteenth in Santa Barbara County commemorating the freeing of enslaved people in United States.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed13:10 · ≈ 9:13 AM

Thank you very much. Supervisor Williams did you have any comments about this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed13:20 · ≈ 9:13 AM

I think Juneteenth is a great historic celebration. Number one, even though it was something uniquely at first regional but it has relevance to the whole country because it celebrates the end of slavery and not just the announcement of the end of slavery and therefore it's fitting for the historical moment we are in right now where It reminds us that we can announce something like the end of discrimination or the end certain forms of state-sponsored discrimination, but that it often takes years to make that into a reality.

The fact was that slavery did not end the moment it was announced. It took human work and this is a celebration thereof and I think therefore uniquely needed and called for at this time in our history.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:29 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Thank you. And I know that Mr. Becker is on the line or wants to comment and he had written previously about a typographical error in the original draft of the resolution which has been fixed, and I think he wants to speak to that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed14:51 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Yes thank you Chair Hart and members of the board we have one request on this item and that is Mr. Tom Becker

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed15:05 · ≈ 9:15 AM

Thank you. On December 18, 1865 the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was adopted. That amendment abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in the United States except as punishment for crime. Over 350,000 Union troops died to make the 13 Amendment happen. In total over 620,000 Americans died during the war between states. I don't believe it's too much to ask the individuals who wrote and support today's resolution to get the historical facts straight.

On June 13th, I sent the three county supervisors who wrote the Juneteenth Resolution an email. In that email, I pointed out an ignorant historical error in the body of the resolution. The three county supervisors who wrote the resolution stated, quote, Jerry Forney regarded as Santa Barbara's first black resident It was brought here as a slave in 1881. The factually challenged people who put this resolution on today's agenda show such disrespect to the millions of people who suffered under slavery that they refused to study history and refused to get facts straight.

On Monday, June 15th, in response to my June 13th email, the three county supervisors revised the resolution And the ignorance went from bad to worse. They are now claiming that Forney came to California as a former slave accompanied by his former master. The UCSB document, Roots of Community correctly states that Forney came to California in the mid-19th century in bondage and accompanied by his master.

It's now summertime. It is time for people of all creeds and colors to enjoy the warm weather and be happy Juneteenth should be a day of barbecues, games and joyous celebration just like the Fourth of July. However any person participating in Juneteenth events organized by individuals with a weak grasp of history and seeking political power will spend the day with a bullhorn in their face immersed in a hateful spew of toxic ignorance.

Americans are fun loving people Enjoy life, have a happy summer and don't ruin the next three months by hanging out with a bunch of Debbie Downers who've never read a history book. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:38 · ≈ 9:17 AM

you. Supervisor Hartman did you have

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8517:39 · ≈ 9:17 AM

something? Just a note of procedure I am proud to vote in support of this resolution but the Brown Act requires that the public's business be conducted in public so only two board members can bring this forward so I just wanted Mr. Becker to know that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:57 · ≈ 9:17 AM

And I think the takeaway lesson from this is that our community needs to invest in better means to recognize, record and celebrate the contribution of black residents in Santa Barbara County life and history. It was very difficult to find definitive information on Mr. Forney's experience in Santa Barbara County. And I think that's something that's missing from our historical record that should be corrected.

Supervisor Adam you wanted to speak to this as well?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:29 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Yeah, as I said last Thursday, I disavow police brutality. I disavow racism and I disavow white supremacy. And it is without apology that I tell you that I will not be supporting the proposed resolution. I will abstain and I would like everyone to know the reason why. The reason has nothing to do with the resolution itself. The resolution, and I quote, encourages all residents to use this time to learn about the legacy of slavery and stand up for racial justice in our community which is not a problem.

My hesitation to join with you in voting for this resolution comes from the whereas clauses. These clauses are supposed to be the statements of fact that support the action called for in the resolution, but here in this resolution, the language is divisive and inflammatory and many of the facts are really conclusions presented as facts that I cannot vote to adopt.

If we are to make any real progress on these issues, we must first dial back the rhetoric and look for the common ground that we share as the jumping off point for making real progress on these difficult issues. And I want to quote Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia, we are just one race here, it is American.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:58 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Thank you Supervisor Adams. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed20:04 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Well, as one of the hands that helped drafted the language I did not intend for it to be divisive. I intended it to be accurate and maybe reflect some of the internal conflicts We as a nation have and some of the internal conflicts that even a given family can have. I mean, I am a member of a family and my wife's family obviously being Navajo they have a very present consciousness of the injustices in America's history recent history where right when Navajo was being used to win the war in the Pacific, they were forbidden to use the language. And the language was being stamped out of existence by agents of our government just during World War II.

But I also come from a family You know, where we are acutely aware of the hope that America presents even with loss. My grandfather grew up in Indonesia and served in the Dutch Royal Navy and was subjected to a lot of racism not from Americans but from Dutch. Back then in colonialism if you were running out of food the Dutch officers got full rations than the Indonesian sailors starved, so he always used to joke that the food got much better after they got captured by the Japanese and went into a POW camp. But he came to America because the Americans he met that liberated the camp outside of Nagasaki that he was housed were the first white people he had ever met that treated him something like an equal. Like, at least a kin.

And he saw something really special in that. I still see that as special and don't mean to take a lot of time but I just want to make sure that Supervisor Adam knows that

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:22 – 0:2729 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed22:25 · ≈ 9:22 AM

seeing the flaws in our history does not mean that I or any of us need to lose one whit of the passion for what this country can stand up for. It can be present in the same heart, it can be present in the same family and it can be present in the same nation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:46 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Williams. Is there a motion to approve? Excuse me, Supervisor Lavinino?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:53 · ≈ 9:22 AM

No, it's Adam. Maybe the next time Supervisor Williams wants to write something he might reach across the aisle for a partner to write it. Just suggesting instead of being in the echo chamber up there and I think it's the south end of the fourth floor. It might be good to reach out to the colonies and maybe we could get a more balanced resolution that I could support, because I'd sure love to support the line of the resolution. There's some stuff in there that I can't do. I will

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed23:34 · ≈ 9:23 AM

take you up on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:35 · ≈ 9:23 AM

that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed23:35 · ≈ 9:23 AM

offer. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:35 · ≈ 9:23 AM

you Mr. Abbott. Are we ready for a motion? Would somebody like to make a motion on this item?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8523:42 · ≈ 9:23 AM

I move we adopt the resolution.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:45 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Thank

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8523:45 · ≈ 9:23 AM

you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:45 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Second. Motion's been made in second, any more discussion? Roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:50 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:52 · ≈ 9:23 AM

No.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:53 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:53 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Oops sorry, I was going to abstain. Sorry, abstain.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:57 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Mr Lavinino? Reflex

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:58 · ≈ 9:23 AM

action. Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed24:01 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Mr Williams? Aye. Ms Hartman? Aye. Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:05 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed24:05 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Motion passes 4-1 with one abstention.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:08 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you. The next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed24:08 · ≈ 9:24 AM

item we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:09 · ≈ 9:24 AM

have is Item number 27. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed24:15 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board. Administrative Item number 27 is from General Services. It is to consider recommendations regarding award a design-build contract for the new Cuyama Fire Station 27 formerly known as Fire Station 41 Project Number 8751 and this is in the First District and we have one request on this item and that is Andy Caldwell

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed24:59 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board, this is Andy Caldwell. We know that the fire department and the sheriff's department need a new place in Quiama and we know that any new building would cost several million dollars. However, a couple years ago when the former chief brought this up, the board balked at that price and he balked at that price They sent it back I thought to come up with a more reasonable priced alternative.

If you do the math, this station's going to cost upwards of $700 a square foot and yet most of it is going to be a bay for equipment, basically a giant garage with the house and office building attached to it. We just think it's inordinately expensive. And anyway like I said we support construction project and don't doubt the necessity of it that fail to understand how something could cost $700 a square foot. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:06 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Thank you, Mr. Caldwell

The next item is number 39

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed26:14 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, administrative item number 39 is from public health. It is to consider recommendations regarding United Way of Santa Barbara County critical needs fund memorandum of understanding for COVID-19 response. And I do believe we have Ben Romo as well as Steve Ortiz available on zoom.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:34 · ≈ 9:26 AM

Thank you. I wanted to pull this item from this week's agenda to highlight a philanthropic partnership in support of the county's COVID- 19 response and efforts In late March, the United Way of Santa Barbara County began conversations with our public health department about how the philanthropic community might best support our COVID response. And since then, United Way of Santa Barbara County has launched a Public Health Critical Needs Fund to raise money from philanthropic donors to help support the county's COVID-19 leadership. We're very grateful for that work and today at the critical needs fund has raised $375,000 to support collaborative effort approaches to COVID-19 response That are informed by the Public Health Department's leadership and are aligned with the county's efforts.

And United Way has raised money and contracted with the Family Service Agency to hire and train contract tracers, a critical component of the county's multi-pronged approach to fighting COVID-19. And I believe as the clerk identified Steve Ortiz from United Way is available. Thank you Steve. Do you have any additional comments you'd like to make? And thank you for all your work.

0:27 – 0:3110 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed27:43 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Just thank you for the partnership. It's been great working with the team at the county. Our goal is to help and try to get our community back to a safe reopening as soon as possible. This is kind of an overflow from the Thomas Fire Partnership, and we're very proud to be working with the County of Santa Barbara in providing the staff and funding needed for this community.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:08 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Thank You Mr. Ortiz Does Mr. Romo want to add anything as well?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed28:16 · ≈ 9:28 AM

I don't, Mr. Chair. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:18 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Thank you both for being available and thank you most importantly for your work and the wonderful collaboration with the County Department of Public Health. We really appreciate it. It was a moment of community need and I'm sure it will not be the last time that we collaborate so thank you very much. Next item is A55.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:36 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board. Administrative item number 55 is from the sheriff. It is to consider recommendations regarding California Forensic Medical Group CFMG slash WellPath annual report for health care services at sheriff detention facilities

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:51 · ≈ 9:28 AM

in reviewing this report I didn't see any mention of the COVID-19 response and the medical contractors efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the jail and I think that's an important story that would be useful to have documented It isn't a matter of the timing of when the report was written necessarily because there are references to COVID-19 in the document specifically about the relationship of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care accreditation process. There's reference to that being stalled by Response to COVID-19. So I'd love to see this report updated and brought back to us with that kind of information. I think it's very important to document that as part of our response going forward to how we operate the jail, having that information in a subsequent report would be helpful.

I don't know if we necessarily need to not adopt this report but we need some additional information that gets into that element and I think that would address my concern.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:54 · ≈ 9:29 AM

And Chair Hart, members of the board. We do have Ryan Sullivan available on Zoom if you'd like any comments. Okay, that would be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:00 · ≈ 9:30 AM

great. Mr. Sullivan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed30:03 · ≈ 9:30 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board, Commander Ryan Sullivan on behalf of Sheriff's Office. I'm joined today by our Health Services Administrator from WellPath, Amber Nunes. The reason for the lack of information regarding COVID was basically just a timing issue. It was that the contract year ends March 31st and the majority of our efforts related to COVID have been following that date.

However, we'd be happy to either amend the report or come back at a later date with further information regarding our COVID response and really the whole depth of our response in our plan in dealing with this COVID pandemic.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:46 · ≈ 9:30 AM

Thank you I think that's a great solution just a report supplementary report that you know And I appreciate that this timing period, you know barely overlapped your initial response. So thank you for that clarification. That's fine for me. And do we have a motion to approve the balance of the administrative agenda?

0:31 – 0:4229 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8531:11 · ≈ 9:31 AM

So moved Mr. Chair. Is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:14 · ≈ 9:31 AM

there a second? Second. Motion has been made and seconded any discussion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:22 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Mr. Adam?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8531:23 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:24 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8531:27 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:27 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:29 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:29 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:31 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:32 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:33 · ≈ 9:31 AM

And now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the agenda today. Madam Clerk are there any requests to speak on items not on today's agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:42 · ≈ 9:31 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, yes we have five requests to speak on general public comment today. And they are all letters to be read into the record and I will begin with Sullivan Israel. Hello, my name is Sullivan Israel and I am a local Hispanic citizen. I appreciate the police. I value their bravery and courage to defund the citizens of this town from crime both violent and nonviolent. I've just completed my first year of college and it seems that many people my age are very angry with the police across America. Blaming them for racial injustice and violence. I however don't think that just because a police officer in Minneapolis killed a man means that the local police here in Santa Barbara, thousands of miles away or even in LA where 86% of the police force Our people of color are in any way associated with or to blame for the unfair death, assuming that would be akin to racism.

Just because one member of a large group does something wrong doesn't mean that all the rest are bad or to blame. When I see the number of police who have been hurt, shot at, spit at and yelled at over the past few weeks, I'm greatly saddened. The vast majority of these officers are only trying to do their job, protect the human rights Citizens as guaranteed by our constitution. When that document was written, there wasn't a single country in which the inalienable rights of an average person were protected. Tyranny and direct royal rule were the status quo. Societies lack due process or equality before the law. When our founding fathers wrote the Constitution over 200 years ago they stated that this new country would protect rather than violate these laws.

A police force was created to ensure these rights, and for the most part they have been doing their job well ever since. This is why when I walk down State Street and see police, I am comforted not afraid. I know that should be assaulted or robbed- I know that should I be assaulted or robbed or threatened, the police are there to help me and find the perpetrator. Without these officers, the tenuous line between civilization where business profits and people aren't afraid to sleep at night and anarchy would be broken as it would As it has been in recent weeks. Indeed, I recognize how lucky I am to have you the police here to protect me and my family because of how many countries still to this day are not safe for the average person to live or prosper.

In some of those countries, the police work with corrupt politicians to violently suppress civil rights and others to oppress or ignore the rights of women. While America isn't and never has been perfect, it has never descended into such violent chaos as exists in so many places today. That in large part is due to our police finding criminals and arresting them, freeing our society of fear. So I would like to speak out and say that as bleak as it looks now with so many young people ignoring this important history and facts, I am one young person who supports and highly appreciates my local police officers. Thank you for all that they do. Sullivan Israel age 20.

CommentYonah ZimmerProposedself-stated34:34 · ≈ 9:34 AM

We will now go to public comment submitted by Yonah Zimmer. Good morning Chair Hart and board members, my name is Yonah Zimmer and I am the attorney for the owner of 869 Sandpoint Road Carpinteria area one of eight homeowners in the Casablanca subdivision this is to request your board to specifically consider and respond To our offer of May 15th, 2020 jointly submitted with Gaines and Stacy LLP proposing a global resolution of your notice of violation of January 7th, 2017 to the Casablanca Homeowners Association. We have just received confirmation through a public records request that there is no document reflecting any requests by the county for the Coastal Commission staff to initiate or pursue an enforcement action against my client. Jurisdictional issues aside, the county's continued failure to take a stand for your constituent Will directly impact her privacy, security value and quiet enjoyment of her property.

That said we remain willing to participate in a global resolution of the dispute with the Coastal Commission and the State Lands Commission if the county accepts our concept for resolution Please provide specific direction to County Council on these essential deal points and have them contact me. It is my view that these clarifications simply reflect the undisputed facts and the law. Please confirm, one, that you will not accept liability for or open a walkway within the easement recorded in 2011 or anywhere on or between the revetment and the homes because of the present and future hazards of wave run-up Two, that you are willing to accept a vertical access in the general location we have suggested as the only feasible alternative option for physical access across this property.

And three, that the incorporation of the terms Offered to dedicate into the county's resolution of acceptance in 2011, confirmed the county's intent that there is no duty to construct any public walkway on the HOA property until the Coastal Commission, the County and the State Lands Commission all approve necessary permits for such construction. Yana Zimmer, Attorney, Government Relations Consulting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed36:54 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Thank you Ms. Zimmer. Supervisor Williams? I did want to just as a follow-up to that request that when time permits, that County Council give us an update in closed session on this matter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed37:11 · ≈ 9:37 AM

Chair Hart and Supervisors certainly, and I could respond briefly now to the comment. This general comment letter refers to a case currently in litigation. The county was successful on a motion for summary judgment so there are currently no claims pending against the county. This past Wednesday June 10th we participated in a case management conference for litigation at which time we agreed to participate in settlement discussions among the private parties and the Coastal Commission It is our understanding that Coastal Commission enforcement staff will soon be setting dates for a potential meeting among the private parties and the agencies, including the county.

Coastal Commission originally planned to bring this item to closed session earlier, but now it looks like that will not occur until July. We are happy to continue communications with Ms. Zimmer and the other private parties, but this is a case where the county is not a live litigant in the case and essentially is being asked to be a lever with the coastal commission so we'll participate in the discussions, but there are no life claims on the county.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed38:15 · ≈ 9:38 AM

Thank you for that clarification. Next public comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed38:21 · ≈ 9:38 AM

We will now go to a letter by Peggy Wilson. Dear Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors and county clerk, government should protect everyone equally without fear or favor. Our Declaration of Independence says we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal. Justice is blind. Justice demands equality under the law. Once justice is qualified by immutable characteristics of a person's skin or race etc., it is no longer blind. Law enforcement and first responders serve our community no matter the type of tragedy or natural disaster. They are the only agencies that answer the call in the middle of the night. Emergency preparedness must not be overlooked. As a community, we demand that you use caution and take time to act strategically when considering the best way to reallocate any services or funds removed from the law enforcement budget.

There is an immense push in our nation to defund law enforcement because of one officer who did unspeakable harm And to this country, all of America agrees. This was evil. This was wrong. I urge the Board of Supervisors to be measured as a whole country enters an age of policy reform but it is imperative that it considers the wishes of the entire community and not react in a detrimental manner to our Sheriff Department do not defund law enforcement. Thank you for your consideration Peggy Wilson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed39:38 · ≈ 9:39 AM

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:38 · ≈ 9:39 AM

Miss Wilson

CommentYonah ZimmerProposedself-stated39:39 · ≈ 9:39 AM

We will now go to public comments submitted by Jim Nell. Stop the craziness! I believe government should protect everyone, equally without fear or favor. As a business owner, I am continually challenged by a myriad of issues that require the services from and presence of police. As Santa Barbara struggles to rebuild from the economic aftermath of the last three months it is more important than ever to keep our city and its visitors feeling safe. The overall economic redevelopment of Santa Barbara depends on it. I urge the city council to be measured as our whole country enters an age of policing and policy reform, but it is imperative that it considers the wishes of the entire community and not react in a detrimental manner to our police force.

Jim Nell, SEMA Corporation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:29 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Thank you Mr. Nell.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:30 · ≈ 9:40 AM

We will now go to a letter by Bobby McGinnis. Dear Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors and county clerk, government should protect everyone equally without fear or favor. As a business owner I am continually challenged by myriad of issues that require the services from and presence of police. As Santa Barbara struggles to rebuild from the economic aftermath over the last three months it is more important than ever to keep our country and its visitors feeling safe. The overall economic redevelopment in Santa Barbara County depends on it. I urge the board of supervisors to be measured As our whole country enters an age of policing and policy reform. But it is imperative that it considers the wishes of the entire community, and not react in a detrimental manner to our Sheriff Department.

Also I recommend that the grand jury investigate systemic racism in all of our departments including the police and sheriff department. The safety of our community now and in the future depends On informed and not reactive decisions, please do not defend law enforcement. Thank you for your consideration Bobby McGinnis.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:28 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Thank you Mr. McGinnis

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed41:29 · ≈ 9:41 AM

and that concludes public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:30 · ≈ 9:41 AM

Thank You ma'am clerk next item is departmental item number one excuse me supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8541:37 · ≈ 9:41 AM

I just had a comment, if I may. Fire season is here and on Sunday we had a fire in western area of Buelton and an evacuation order came while I was catching up on my email Sunday afternoon And on behalf of my neighbors, I would like to thank the firefighters from all jurisdictions across the county that deployed as well as the sheriff's deputies and the CHP.

It was heavy winds dry and really frightening. And in my case, to evacuate with six horses and three dogs and six cats is quite a thing. So 20 years in my area I lived without an evacuation, and now we've had three in the last 18 months. So I think that's a signal that things are changing so it's just a warning to all of us. I now have a bag packed, I have my animal carriers ready to go, and I encourage others to do the same because we're living in a different world today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:40 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Thank you very much Supervisor Hartman, good advice.

The next item is departmental item number one. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?

0:42 – 0:495 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed42:50 · ≈ 9:42 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed43:04 · ≈ 9:43 AM

CEO Miyasato or is Ms. Anderson or Dr. Doronoso going to start us off?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role43:10 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Thank you, Chair. I'll be Dr. DiRenoso.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed43:32 · ≈ 9:43 AM

Good morning, Chair and members of the board. I am happy to be here to give you a somewhat lengthy report on data. And today's briefing topics include a presentation, a synopsis from our results from our countywide demographic data. We will also be covering the results from our Demographic survey of the Santa Maria cases. As well as giving you a brief status on our monitoring project, or rather the state's monitoring project of our county. As well as provide information that your board has requested in a previous meeting.

So to begin with, I'd like to introduce you to Miss Joy Kane, our senior epidemiologist who will be presenting on our countywide demographic data.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed44:35 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Thank you so to start. We're going to, first can you go back one slide? Sorry. So to start we're going to look at our confirmed cases that were interviewed by race and ethnicity through May 8th and there were 443 of those individuals. And this first graph shows the race ethnicity and 68.1% were Latino or Hispanic. As you can see here, in blue are the race ethnicity of our coronavirus cases and 68.1% of our coronavirus cases are Latino or Hispanic. In comparison 48% of the Santa Barbara population is Latino or Hispanic indicating an over representation of Latino Hispanics with Coronavirus.

Next we looked at categorized census tracts by percent living below the federal poverty level. The area poverty level with the highest age-adjusted rate was 20 to 30%, and that had an age adjusted rate of 141%. The next slide is looking at hospitalizations of those that were interviewed and 89 of our coronavirus cases interviewed were hospitalized, of which 56.2% were Latino Hispanic.

There were a total of seven deaths recorded during this time, of which 71% were Latino or Hispanic. In summary, looking at our confirmed cases as well as deaths we see higher numbers and percents among Latinos than whites. When hospitalized acuity as well as the length of stay in the hospital is higher among Latinos in comparison to other groups. There's a clear association between lower income and increased rate of testing and confirmed cases.

More persons with lower income are seeking out testing and are testing positive. The initial coronavirus cases interviewed by the public health department mostly had private insurance, this may indicate those with public insurance and those who are uninsured or not being tested. And there's a relatively low death count in Santa Barbara County as of that time.

So some strategies, one is to ensure access to testing for those in highly impacted communities. Also to integrate testing with care coordination for highly impacted communities. To facilitate access to other supportive resources, continue to support local national policies and alleviate the burden of this disease and promote more equitable investment in our communities.

And to provide more inclusive data collection, reporting and deeper analysis. To understand the unique risk and preventative factors among highly impacted communities. Also to continue with contact tracing and tracking. And to strengthen and tailor communication strategies to increase the access and conduct more robust outreach education and community engagement.

So some next steps for the Public Health Department include ensure those at high risk with coronavirus have access to health insurance, primary care and safety net programs as well as to continue to expand testing communities at risk for coronavirus. And if you check out our entire report, there's a little bit of additional information which I wanted to highlight including the percent of confirmed coronavirus cases by race, ethnicity and age group.

Confirmed coronavirus community cases by census tract, poverty level, age adjusted rates Confirmed coronavirus community patients hospitalized by race, ethnicity as well as ICU admissions. The length of stay of hospitalized community coronavirus positive patients who have been discharged by age group and the percent of Lompoc federal prison coronavirus incarcerated cases by race, ethnicity and age group.

0:49 – 1:0715 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed49:25 · ≈ 9:49 AM

So this detailed report will be available on our website. I'd like to pause here to see if your board has any questions about what Ms. Kane just presented.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:37 · ≈ 9:49 AM

Thank you very much, Supervisor Hartman has a question.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8549:41 · ≈ 9:49 AM

On slide number eight, I'm a little confused. It says that there's an association between lower incomes and increased rates of testing and positive tests, and then public insurance that people aren't being tested. So is it low income with private insurance? Or it just seemed to be a contradiction.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed50:04 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Supervisor through the chair, we would have to investigate that a little bit further. What we did see is that lower incomes had increased rates of testing as well as increased confirmed cases and then we also saw that there was some association with insurance status as well so we can go back and review that in more detail.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8550:27 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Right and just to be clear that we do have testing available that people don't have to pay for right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed50:33 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Correct At all at our three community sites, which will be available through the end of July. And the department has intends to continue some form of community testing without the ability to pay as a barrier.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:54 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed50:58 · ≈ 9:50 AM

Well I want to ask you to sort A gut call or a. Not necessarily, you know, make a conclusive answer to this, but you know there's there seems to be about three different theories of. That would explain this this this data one would be that. The came in before that the coronavirus is more prevalent among Explanation number one. More prevalent among populations that have a higher number of people living in the household.

Explanation number two, more prevalent among populations that have to work more often and have had to work in higher amounts through the lockdown. Third explanation which I'm sure is someone Is less of an ethic of mask wearing in the North County. That's a possible explanation, but I'm sure it wasn't north county person who came up with that theory and maybe 4th would be associated with other health preconditions.

So tell me which of those four do you feel have significant? Or significant factors in this?

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed52:35 · ≈ 9:52 AM

Supervisor Williams through the chair, those are really four great theories as to why we see higher rates of disease in our lower socioeconomic and they all have good foundation. So when we compare our... This is actually more applicable discussion for after the Santa Maria presentation but-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed53:01 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Sure

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed53:01 · ≈ 9:53 AM

you can wait

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed53:02 · ≈ 9:53 AM

till that then.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed53:04 · ≈ 9:53 AM

So I'll take a rain check on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:07 · ≈ 9:53 AM

Okay, we'll come back. Any other questions at this point in the presentation? Okay seeing none let's keep going thank you. Great

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed53:17 · ≈ 9:53 AM

so we also did an in-depth study into our Santa Maria confirmed cases and the data is as of May 27th So the first cases of COVID-19 in our county were identified as belonging to residents who lived in North County. Over the past several months, Santa Maria continues to see elevated cases and in order to better understand why that was happening we began an in depth retrospective survey on With the confirmed cases. And so, what that means is that our team called the cases at the confirmed cases and asked a series of questions that gave us some indication about the family, about the living situation, the work situation in order to understand why We were seeing the higher disparate number of cases in Santa Maria. So this is just to give you a context of the burden of disease in our county, so even what we're interested in today is giving you an in-depth look at what's happening in Santa Maria.

So if we look at the map of Santa Maria, we see that the orange square represents active cases from 15 to 19 cases with the larger, a little bit darker orange down here as having cases Anywhere between 10 and 15 with the lightest cases 1 to 5. So you can see that the burden of disease is all over Santa Maria, however the density if you will of cases Is not in this main corridor and this main corridor is And we also note that this area.

The darker colors, the reds, the dark orange. The dark, what would you say this? Darker pumpkin color. These are representative of areas that have more congregate settings such as skilled nursing facilities, long term care facilities, shelters, treatment and recovery facilities. The data source are cases who have agreed to be interviewed, and so that would be 344. We made contact with 344 cases. And so of the people that we interviewed, 134 were in Santa Maria and 210 were not in the Santa Maria cases area.

With regards to race and ethnicity, you see that in comparison of Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases there is a disproportionate representation among our Hispanic and Latino population. With regards to the representation of Hispanic Latino cases as compared to population, we also see a overrepresentation by about 42%. Age comparison. Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases, we see a younger population among Santa Maria cases.

Gender comparison between Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases. We see higher, a little bit higher in female versus male. Primary language comparison between Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases. We have a lower number who identified English as the primary language versus higher A group who identified Spanish as the primary language. What was interesting to us was that from the get-go, when we saw a high number of cases in Santa Maria and also with the higher hospitalization.

We were worried that making wanting to make sure that all of our health education, all of our public information that we were pushing out were linguistically accessible And we made sure that what we were pushing out were not only in Spanish, but were available interpreted into Mixteco as well. Education level comparison, we see that the Santa Maria cases when looked at versus non-Santa Maria cases. There was a lower higher education attainment in our Santa Maria cases compared to non-Santa Maria cases.

Annual income of Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases. We see the highest bar being in the 25,000 to 50,000 level with the other high bar refusing to answer. Household size comparison, and this is what Supervisor Williams had alluded to earlier. We see that among our Santa Maria cases versus non-Santa Maria cases there were a higher number of our Santa Maria cases reporting a larger family grouping.

With 27 being reporting there were 5, 22% reporting that there were four in their household. And with six household members 16% reported as such. What was noteworthy to us, which we hadn't seen in any of the state demographics. Was we were also curious and somewhat worried about could the place of employment be a driver of infection? So when we did ask in our survey places of employment and we found that 20% were farm workers.

With the other high number being healthcare, so that's 7% with direct patient care and 4% non-patient care. And with 4% in government. And in addition to that, we saw 8% identified as being part of the prison staff. With 11%, saying that reporting that they were unemployed or disabled. So what this tells us is that a good amount of our Santa Maria cases were essential services workers.

Additional occupation information. So the previous slide showed occupation data from cases who agreed to be interviewed, but we also have another source of information is from our disease control investigation staff who speak with the cases nearly on a daily basis or Frequently during their isolation and quarantining period. And what we found was that as of June 11th, 20 nearly 26% of the cases that we had identified themselves as being farm workers.

So the key data findings for this retrospective survey of insurance coverage, 73% said yes they were. They had some form of insurance coverage whether that be public or private and 87% stated that they heard about COVID-19 from the TV. 27% said they somewhat knew about COVID-19, with 34% said they knew moderately about COVID-19. And 20% saying that they were extremely knowledgeable about COVID- 19. So we asked this question to understand about the community's understanding of COVID-19.

We also probe for knowledge about hand washing and social distancing, so 92% of the interviewees said that they understood the importance of handwashing and 70% understood the knowledge around social distancing. And with knowledge comes the question, if you know it do you practice it or do you have the capacity to practice it? And 72% said yes. They were able to practice social distancing at home and 52% said that they were able to practice it at work. So that still is worrisome because it leaves a significant number who are unable to practice social distancing at home or at work.

Our findings, Latinos and Hispanics in Santa Maria represent a disproportionately number of high cases compared to their representation in Santa Barbara County population. And in comparison to non-Santa Maria cases. And when we compare non-Santa Maria cases and Santa Maria cases, we found that Santa Maria cases have higher percentage of household size between four and seven Individuals have more cases who were uninsured and less cases with private insurance, but are more likely to understand and practice social distancing at home and at work.

So the next steps is we need to continue to partner with various agencies, to ensure that health insurance coverage and access to healthcare is available. And we need to continue increasing our preventive messaging in various mediums and to also engage in partnership With employers on preventive measures and engage the Santa Maria community in strategies to decrease the spread of disease.

And I will pause here to see if the board has any questions. And this is, I'd like to get back to the comment that Supervisor Williams made earlier which is are the high cases due to bigger households? Are the higher cases due to working in higher risk environments or being essential workers and are there less adherence Is there a higher prevalence of underlying health conditions? And I would say that with regards to testing positives, yes. So like other jurisdictions we are seeing that communities who have to work, who are out and about on their way to work with lots of exposures. Either taking public transportation or in workplaces interacting with the public populations or those communities do have a higher incidence of positivity.

We also know that In communities with higher crowded living in one household, there are more likelihood of higher positivity. Is there less face covering in North County? Anecdotally I've heard that, I've seen it but Scientifically, is there a rigorous study that can attest to that? At this point in time we don't have that. And are there higher, is the population in North County at higher risk or Have higher comorbidities, chronic disease conditions. And yes so I think in an earlier update, I did disclose specific percentages comparing chronic disease prevalence in North County versus South County.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:07 – 1:1513 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:36 · ≈ 10:07 AM

Thank you Supervisor Williams. Did you have any additional questions? Okay.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:07:40 · ≈ 10:07 AM

I do. Lavenino.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:42 · ≈ 10:07 AM

Thank you. Supervisor Lavenino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:07:47 · ≈ 10:07 AM

And I am trying to figure out where we are in the presentation as far as, Curious just as why we took a universal approach to, you know, we were looking at all of the cases. And a lot of these people are going to get the disease or get the virus and not have to move to the hospital. Are we going to do this same sort of breakdown of people that are actually hospitalized so that we would be able to look at? I think what would be really helpful is What is causing some people to get the virus, and for some reason they get extremely ill and are hospitalized in the ICU which is what we have to avoid.

As opposed to just the person out in the community that happens to get sick and is able to recover at home. So is there any data that is telling us It's pre-existing conditions, or it's somebody that hasn't been to a doctor. Or is it somebody with cardiovascular disease or overweight? Or diabetes, what else is there that's telling us these are the people that are actually going to the hospital, these are the ones that are impacting the healthcare industry and this is what we have to avoid.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:09:16 · ≈ 10:09 AM

Supervisor Lavinino through the chair. We can definitely come back with more precise numbers about risks of hospitalizations, but from CDPH and other published reports typically people who are older and or people with underlying chronic conditions or medical conditions typically are higher risk of being hospitalized Our numbers are-

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:09:50 · ≈ 10:09 AM

So that's kind of what I was, yeah. I'm sorry. Go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:09:52 · ≈ 10:09 AM

ahead. I am sorry. So our number even though so off the top of my head I believe that we're in the 50s. So our numbers are quite small to do that precise study but we're more than happy to come back with the hospitalization data from us as a state or as a nation for a future board update.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:10:17 · ≈ 10:10 AM

Well, okay. Maybe because the sample size is so small but what surprised me was I think the message that I heard in the community pretty much was that this was something that was going to attack older people at the beginning. That's kind of what we heard and then our largest in Santa Maria, our largest segment is people 30-49. That's 43% of the people, but I'm curious is out of that 43% of those people that got that from 30 to 49.

How many of those were actually hospitalized as opposed to 20% are people 50-69 and are 100% of those people being hospitalized? We could go out there and spend a bunch of time trying to educate a bunch of young people about what to do when the reality is even if they get it, it's probably not going to be that big of a deal. As opposed to, it might be a small percentage of people that are older that get it but if they do happen to get it They have a very high percentage of being hospitalized so It's just kind of interesting how we present that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:11:26 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Right. So if I hear you correctly, you would like to have a profile for us to dig deeper into our hospitalized cases and the demographics and see who they are.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:11:43 · ≈ 10:11 AM

Yeah, I just think that for me after all these numbers that we've been hearing over and over and over again. And they're important but I'm starting to figure out at least in my mind that it's hospitalizations and ICUs. That's what we have to do in my mind, it seems, And the precise information needs to be on how are these people getting to this point? Because not everybody gets to that point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:12:14 · ≈ 10:12 AM

Right, but so I will come back with we will the team will look at our hospitalization cases and develop a profile. But the thing is though, I think for a more comprehensive prevention message does need to look at the community wide because while younger people may be positive and not get too sick they can spread it to more vulnerable members of the community That is what I would worry about.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:12:47 · ≈ 10:12 AM

Good point, the last point for me is, you know, I think the takeaway is that we're talking about going out and doing more outreach. This study, I think shows us that 87% of the people had heard about coronavirus. They had a pretty good understanding about social distancing and hand washing and I think it would be hard to go out and find somebody, even in Santa Maria. Even in one of those hardest hit neighborhoods to go in and ask if you hadn't heard about it and what you need to do. I think everybody knows what they need to do whether they're able to do that in the job that they have is the big problem or how they get to their job. Do a lot of people ride to work together here?

And they have to work in close contact with each other. So I'm not sure more education is the answer, it doesn't hurt but I'm just not sure how effective that's going to be as a strategy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:13:49 · ≈ 10:13 AM

And I totally agree with you. I'm heartened by the fact that the community knows about social distancing and handwashing, and I think that is a second level that the team had talked about. What do we need to do to engage employers in Creating a safer workplace and whether do we need to support employers in public transportation, limiting the sizes of carpools and whatnot.

A particular interest to me is the cluster Among farm workers, so I did reach out to our Ag Commissioner to see if she would be open to partnering up and sharing or engaging the ag community. How do we support The producers and how do we support the farm workers? So one of the things that we are planning to do is to share this information with the Santa Maria City Council, and employers, and stakeholders. And the community to say what can we, how can the public health department, how can we as a county support North County areas in Of the cases in the incidence of spread.

1:15 – 1:225 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:25 · ≈ 10:15 AM

Thank you. Are there other questions at this point? Let's continue with the rest of the presentation then, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:15:30 · ≈ 10:15 AM

you. My third briefing has to do with the California Department of Public Health monitoring status as I've shared previously that the state is monitoring all counties as we are reopening for elevated disease transmission increasing hospitalization and limited hospital capacity. So the threshold is for the state that the state has set is we will need to have for Santa Barbara County less than around 675 average tests. So if we don't If we don't meet that, then we are in the danger zone. So as of yesterday, we have only achieved 99.2. But I want to say that this has more to do with a lag in the platforms, the reporting platforms. And I think I've shared this with your board before.

So when you see our metrics reflecting a low number It is because of a lag between the electronic lab reporting system and the CalReady platform that the state utilizes. So, that is something that the state is aware of and with the two systems. We did receive a green check mark in the elevated disease transmission category and in the limited hospital capacity, showing that we do have hospital capacity and that we're still okay with our case rate and our testing rates. However, we did receive a red number in our increasing hospitalization So as we have exceeded the 10% change in three day average of COVID positive hospitalized patients.

As of yesterday, the state noted that As our percent change in the average. What this means is that we will be meeting with the state tomorrow, the team to talk about the drivers of these at the increase hospitalization and what are our next steps in addressing maintaining a stable hospitalization So I did reach out to the state, I've assembled my team and I have been in contact with the hospitals. And one hospital in particular about the increased admission in that hospital and probing to see what were those admissions? Are they Santa Barbara County? Are they out of county?

And so we will be in conversation with the state and we will be monitored until we get a green checklist. So what this means, the impact is as you know, personal care sector to be targeted this Friday, to be reopened if our local data meets it. And so we have been in discussion with both SLO and Ventura about our respective numbers and we are hoping to have some conversations further conversations today and reach a decision by tomorrow.

Are there any questions before I

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

move on to the next update?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:19:37 · ≈ 10:19 AM

And just to clarify, Dr. DiMarino, so Ventura is also in the same situation we are, Ventura County?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:19:42 · ≈ 10:19 AM

So they got lifted after a week, I want to say a week and a half maybe less they got lifted. So it's a daily monitoring and I actually asked Ventura how the process and Ventura said they enjoyed the conversations, the dialogue with the state and just the support In getting data, in looking at our systems, looking at our reopening efforts. Looking at how can we engage partners in that shared responsibility that I've talked about?

However, even though CEO Miyasato, even though they are not on the watch list, they are supportive in the delay by a week as well of reopening the last portion of personal care. Previously, the board requested information about deaths among Santa Barbara County residents from January through May as reported on the finalized death certificate. And so we were asked the frequency, the number of death caused by cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer's, stroke, chronic lower respiratory disease, unintentional injuries, diabetes, chronic liver disease cirrhosis and kidney disease.

are the numbers that we reviewed and really want to thank Ms. Kane for being able to review the death certificates. These are preliminary data, so I appreciate her being able to do that amidst everything else. I put that into a graph just so that the board has a sense where COVID deaths fall into what we see typically among deaths. And so cancer is still at the top with COVID-19 for this short time frame being right here above kidney and chronic liver disease.

However, I want to pause here and say that we are very fortunate as a county because other counties don't see this lineup. And so this is a line up from nationally. So this is a comparison of COVID-19 and common US causes of death with heart disease being the number one cancer number two and COVID- 19 being the number three. So even though during this time frame, we see that COVID-19 comprehensively or collectively lands on the third. There were weeks during this timeframe that COVID- 19 deaths in some jurisdictions in some areas was the number one cause of death.

So I am grateful and thankful that we live in a community that doesn't see this.

1:22 – 1:2910 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:22:55 · ≈ 10:22 AM

Mr. Chair?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:22:56 · ≈ 10:22 AM

Yes, Supervisor Adams sounds like he wanted to comment

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:00 · ≈ 10:23 AM

Yeah, it started before I should have. And then I just want to thank Dr. Dona Reynoso for contextualizing that data a little bit and make the observation that we will always have heart disease and cancer with us and COVID is going to subside at some point. So keep that in mind.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:23:32 · ≈ 10:23 AM

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:23:34 · ≈ 10:23 AM

Great, and with that I know that Supervisor Hartman requested information regarding the prison and we are still working on that. So that concludes my update from the Public Health Department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:23:49 · ≈ 10:23 AM

Thank You Dr. Domenoso and Ms. Kane and thank you for your colleagues at the EPI unit too for working hard to put all that information together. I know it was a big job so thank you. And then I think we have Miss Anderson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:24:32 · ≈ 10:24 AM

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and members of the board here to provide you a brief update on the rise business activity since the last meeting. So the recovery update for this week is that we've had multiple changes from the state that we've incorporated into our process. We've had 11 sectors added that were effective June 12th, one sector is pending. That's the personal services as indicated by the public health department that is going to be delayed a bit but the state was indicating it could be effective June 19th with Public Health Officer approval.

They also updated the places of worship for expanded services in outdoor areas where they were limited to 25% or no more than 100 folks within their inside facilities. Public Health also issued their public health order 2020-12, this is related to the June 12th supporting of those sectors, the 11 sectors from the state. So where are we now? We have moved actually for the County of Santa Barbara from Stage 2 sectors that is part of the Governor's Resilience Roadmap into Stage 3.

So, the 11 sectors are listed there and then the pending personal services in the next couple of weeks on there still some indoor playgrounds live theater saunas nightclubs and the bigger venues that are still holding for state guidelines This is just a reminder that we are keeping the Rise Guide updated. It's a living document, the last posting was June 15th, it was Monday to incorporate all these sectors that posted on Friday.

Our reopening process includes a self-certification online process for all of our businesses. We've had numerous businesses taken advantage of this opportunity. They are required to review state and local guidance, including the health orders that are issued, complete their plan template, a checklist and self certify that they can open safely. So here's the numbers for this week, these are as of Friday.

We have 2,645 businesses that have submitted countywide. We've had 2,240 cities and 225 unincorporated businesses. That's about 45% of our unincorporated anticipated businesses. And here are the top 10 industry sectors. Dine-in restaurants and retail continue to be our main leaders in this But we also have some new ones. Beverage industry was just added as of Friday, we've had 63 businesses submit online to reopen for that We do have our RISE ambassadors out in our community helping businesses, making sure that they're aware of the resources available to them on our website.

And just introducing themselves and answering any questions they may have. Our goal is to make sure that our whole community opens safely so that our community is safe. The Small Business and Community Partnership Enhancement Programs, we have actually two phases. Phase one includes the Public Rights-of-Way headed by our Public Works Department and we have about four applicants submitted so far. Phase two was just posted online last week and is going to be heard by your board on the next item for finalization but is for private property in parking lots etc that businesses may expand into all of this information is available online Here are the snapshot of our RecoverySBC website where all the information resides. It is in one central location for the ease of businesses to find the information that they're needing, and our information is as indicated on the website but we also have an EHS admin at sbcphd.org email that our EHS team is fielding any questions that the public may have in regard to their businesses.

They've been extremely helpful in answering kind of gray questions, gray area questions. And they have a response time of less than 48 hours. So anyone who has questions is happy to assist them and that concludes my report. I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:29:01 · ≈ 10:29 AM

Thank you Ms. Anderson. Are there questions for Ms. Anderson or comments to staff? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:29:11 · ≈ 10:29 AM

I just have a general comment because I'm getting or question a lot of requests through email about various kinds of cleaning, sanitizing COVID hygiene products. I assume we don't recommend or review anything to the private sector. Do we have a process internally for how we review products and keep up-to-date for what we do count within our county building?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:29:38 · ≈ 10:29 AM

Supervisors, so we refer businesses to the CDC website that has the approved product list and that's what we use. There is a product list and I believe it might be on one of our websites where you can get that out but that's what we use just the CDC approved list.

1:29 – 1:3519 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:29:54 · ≈ 10:29 AM

And I just like-

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:29:55 · ≈ 10:29 AM

I have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:29:55 · ≈ 10:29 AM

question. Supervisor Lavenino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:29:57 · ≈ 10:29 AM

I'm sorry, I have a question about wineries. So I understand that the food requirement, if you could just explain what the food requirement is if there is still one and in particular people are allowed to bring outside food if the business allows it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:30:19 · ≈ 10:30 AM

Multiple answers and but I'm thinking that and I don't know if one's here anymore, but she may want to add into this but the It was allowed through our EHS department that wineries who typically don't have a food permit could temporarily provide a connection through contracting either through a food or A truck or a restaurant to allow for serving of food that was allowed them to qualify as a dine-in restaurant. Because they are now a sector that's open, they don't need to do that but somehow the interest to continue through that through the COVID 19 temporary crisis.

So we are allowing that to continue until the event is over essentially. In regard to bringing in food to locations, it is my understanding that's been past practice. And our public health director is indicating that that is still an allowable process. So hopefully they answered all your questions Supervisor Lavinio. Supervisor

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:31:28 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Lavinio- They did and that's what I always expect of you Nancy so thank you very much.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:31:32 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Just a reminder that's on your next item as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:36 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Mr. Guzzani?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:31:37 · ≈ 10:31 AM

That was my comment also that when we go to the next item, we'll be discussing some potential protections that the board put in place in case there are changes at the state level.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:46 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Thank you all. CEO Miyasato?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:31:49 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Supervisors if Dr. De Reynoso is still here I know we had received questions about our SNFs and she didn't mention it but I believe we had some questions about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:32:04 · ≈ 10:32 AM

Yes, so I'd like to give you an update on what's happening at our country Oaks skilled nursing facility. The department has been working very closely with state agencies To address the outbreak, which started on May 31st. So we have our disease control team assisting with the disease mitigation and our medical ops team supporting the operations as well as serving as liaison with state agencies such as the Emergency Medical Services Authority, the California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Quality Programs, Licensing and Certification Unit and Healthcare Associated Infection Program. So it's a multi-agency effort.

I am grieved and sad to report to you this morning that there have been three additional deaths yesterday, so bringing a total of five deaths associated with this facility. So as of now we are reporting A total of 28 cases in that facility, 13 staff and 25 residents. This facility is at critical point as they have been met with significant staffing challenges.

However, in partnership with the county and the state we have deployed the following resources. We do have two teams from the state specializing in COVID positive care and response. Each comprised of a nurse, two EMTs known as CalMAT team. We also have Health Corps, a state-run medical staffing services designed to support counties need during the pandemic and they are filling some staffing gaps, nurses and PAs.

The registry staff at the third group are filling in with CNAs and also our county's volunteer medical Reserve Corps has been assisting. So we are closely monitoring with the state agencies and we are working in close partnership with the facility as well, with the goal of making sure that this becomes a safer environment and that staff feel safe working there as well as the residents who are there.

And that concludes my update-

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:34:39 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Thank you, thank you Dr. Reynoso. So of the five deaths were those all residents or were some staff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:34:44 · ≈ 10:34 AM

No they were all residents.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:34:48 · ≈ 10:34 AM

Okay and then I think you had said 28 cases with 13 staff and 25 residents but was that 38 cases or did I get the numbers wrong?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:34:57 · ≈ 10:34 AM

You know what, I did my math wrong. There are a total of 28 cases. And I will verify.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.851:35:05 · ≈ 10:35 AM

So 13 staff and, okay. Yeah that would be helpful thank you. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:11 · ≈ 10:35 AM

Any other questions for Dr. Dobernessa? Do we have some public comment on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:19 · ≈ 10:35 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board yes we have three requests to speak or excuse me four requests to speak on this item and we are first going to the phone with Dr. Melissa Smith to be followed by Anna Marie Gott

1:35 – 1:428 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:35:41 · ≈ 10:35 AM

While we wait, may I update? So that is, I'm sorry. So that is 37 total cases. Supervisor Lavallino.

PresenterDr. Melissa SmithHealth Equity Initiatives at UC Santa BarbaraProposedself-stated1:36:00 · ≈ 10:36 AM

Thank you Board of Supervisors and County Clerk. I am Dr. Melissa Smith, Director of Health Equity Initiatives at UC Santa Barbara. I would like to highlight the importance of having a deep understanding of the data regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the community in Santa Maria. As a physician who has worked in Santa Maria with indigenous farm workers, and as the interim coordinator of the Latinx and Indigenous COVID- 19 Response Task Force, I think it is critical to understand how this pandemic impacts all communities And in particular, those who are part of the essential workforce and those who are more vulnerable to COVID-19 or otherwise disproportionately impacted.

I also served as chair of the expert healthcare panel that created the RISE document to guide reopening efforts in Santa Barbara County. All of these experiences inform my analysis of the priorities of our county's public health efforts I would like to emphasize three points about the value of the data and how it can inform our collective efforts to have an impact and protect the health of everyone in our communities.

First, the demographic data related to Santa Maria is useful in guiding prevention and intervention strategies to reduce cases, hospitalization, and death. Second, policymakers and community stakeholders need to convene reflect and analyze this data in order to create solutions that will mitigate the disproportionate number of cases in Santa Maria. And third, uncontrolled cases in Santa Maria may affect our efforts to reopen Santa Barbara County.

Thank you so much for your consideration and for your support of this important collaborative work.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:37:58 · ≈ 10:37 AM

Thank you very much Dr. Smith and thank you for your insight and your willingness to help us address this issue.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:07 · ≈ 10:38 AM

We will now go to Anna-Marie Gott.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:38:21 · ≈ 10:38 AM

Board of Supervisors, I have a few observations from hearing the report this morning. One is We are looking at a primarily Hispanic population that is being tested positive. Two, many of these individuals may be our essential workers. I'd also like to make an observation of where our testing site is in Santa Barbara. It's at Earl Warden Showground which has no access to an MTD bus stop Within a half a mile because of the fact that we've had to shut down many of our bus routes.

If you were coming from the West side, you would have to walk 1.9 miles to actually get to the testing site after you took a bus ride. If you were trying to go from the East side, you would actually have to walk another half a mile once you got off the bus and in both cases It's an hour bus ride. We already know in the city of Santa Barbara that most of our Hispanic population lives on the east and west side, but they don't have easy access to any testing sites.

I really urge you to move the testing sites To ensure that the testing sites are readily available to those who are dependent upon our busing system and who may not be able to get to Earl Warren Showgrounds or any other location because they don't have access to a vehicle. They may not be able to bring their entire family with them, because they have to watch young children.

What we need to think about too is that if these individuals are essential workers, they may be spreading the disease. Thank you.

CommentYonah ZimmerProposedself-stated1:40:26 · ≈ 10:40 AM

We will now go to public comments submitted by Dr. Hesu Witten. Regarding COVID-19 policy, it's really important we get it right and policy should reflect actual science not baseless fear. Every prediction the CDC and WHO made about the dangers of COVID turned out to be wrong. We now know the science with a high degree of certainty and policy should reflect that. The facts are one, children have an extremely low probability of complications and there's no evidence they transmit COVID-19 to adults. Not a single case.

Two, there's no scientific justification for children wearing masks in school. Surgical masks are designed for sterile environments. Surgeons replace them every 30 minutes and if they touch the mask they immediately have to re-sterilize. Three, the initial predictions were 2 million American deaths And 3 to 4% mortality rate. The death rate ended up being orders of magnitude lower and the fatality rate is 0.26% and .03% for people under 50.

Four, there's no scientific justification for an emergency order to continue Or for children to wear masks in school or anywhere. Masks are ineffective, unnecessary and even dangerous. Three Chinese children died from running at school with masks on. Unless you can provide science indicating a real and imminent threat to health or that the hospitals are beyond capacity from the so called pandemic, you are committing fraud to allow them emergency order to continue. The health officer by law must provide the science to the Board of Supervisors to justify his orders. Dr. Witten.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42:14 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Thank you, Dr. Witten.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:42:15 · ≈ 10:42 AM

And we will now go to our final speaker, Lee Heller on the phone.

1:42 – 2:0319 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:42:33 · ≈ 10:42 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, this is Lee Heller. Good morning and I want to begin by thanking Supervisor Williams for asking the questions that I would have asked during the presentation and for Dr. Soforth having already anticipated them and covered them so thoroughly in your detailed breakdown on both demographics and what causes are that results in the outcomes we are seeing.

I want to add something that I hope we are all thinking about, which is where people live is not necessarily where they work. One of the issues is this fact that 2% of people don't feel able to practice social distancing in the workplace. Then we have to look beyond to look at where exposure might be and help businesses to do a better job in protecting essential Just going around South County, and I've been up in North County a little bit.

I am seeing failure to comply as we shall say with both physical distancing keeping six feet apart and face coverings in a variety of businesses including businesses that you wouldn't expect like my veterinarian's office. And I think it's really important that there continue to be aggressive outreach and education to all to help them understand that it's their health that is at risk It's not just those of us who are consumers, but the people in these workplaces all day that may be exposed by lax consumers but also by their colleagues. So maybe more aggressive outreach and support to businesses and asset stores than you know I'm always willing to be one. So thank you again. I'm sure we can address this problem and find a way to make things better.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:19 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Thank you Dr. Heller.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:44:22 · ≈ 10:44 AM

And that was our final speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:24 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Thank you, are there additional board comments or questions? I guess I'd just like to say that the increasing hospitalization numbers and the information about the skilled nursing facility outbreaks are very sobering. And it's a reminder that we're not done with COVID-19 and that the virus remains a threat both to public health and to our economic recovery.

The good news is that from the information that the Public Health Department has gleaned from their survey, that a really large percentage of people understand what we need to do. The personal strategies remain the most effective in wearing face coverings and washing your hands and not touching your face. Something that I think is an increasing challenge is as more businesses are opening and people are going back to work there is pressure on folks who may potentially have symptoms To work and that is a tough challenge to ask people to not go to work when they are feeling symptoms. But that's really important, we can't have that happening. The other good news is that the voluntary testing rate continues to be very strong at all locations and that's something that also isn't easy.

People have to step up and do that it is free and it's pretty darn convenient when you get down to it but maintaining that is important for us to be able to track the virus. The RISE ambassadors are doing a very good job of working with businesses. They're well received, those interactions are positive and helpful and the more we can do of that the better as Ms. Heller mentioned some businesses Are doing a better job than others and having those ambassadors provide that information help tighten up those systems make sure employees are safe as well as customers is really important.

And I'm very hopeful that the new collaboration that we're proposing in Santa Maria with community organizations and local government partners will create some new creative intervention strategies and communication strategies that will help change some of the trends that we're seeing you know it is really It's not just a matter of communicating the need to do this, but it is the reminder that we all need to continue practicing that. It is easy. I personally struggle with this all the time. How often is enough to wash hands? Don't touch my face. That's something that gets easy to slip up on.

So a constant reminder all the time is part of what we're trying to do here. Thank everybody for all their work and You know, we'll hope things turn around soon in the right direction. Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:46:57 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Williams? I just was inspired by your words to echo them and say that because we don't completely know whether people are getting it more at home or work or on the way to work there is some level of uncertainty and in the area of uncertainty it just becomes crucial to practice very Stringent personal responsibility, even when it may be an issue like mask wearing that you find irritating. I find a lot of the rituals that we go through irritating and sad in some ways but we've got to keep with the program because we're not out of I want to make a couple of points. First of all.

It's not just a matter of time. We all depend on that level of responsibility and people's lives depend on that level of responsibility. So I just urge that that if we all take those steps, a responsibility including an especially staying home when you are experiencing symptoms. That we can come out of this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:15 · ≈ 10:48 AM

OK. Thank you. Supervisor Williams is there Motion has been made, is there a second? Second. And roll call please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:35 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board just for clarification purposes that is approving recommendations A through C on today's agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:41 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:45 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:47 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:47 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:50 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:50 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Mr Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:51 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:52 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Ms. Hartman?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:52 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:53 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Chair Hart? Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:56 · ≈ 10:48 AM

We'll take a ten minute break and then come back for department item number two. We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting and

the next item is departmental item number 2. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?

2:03 – 2:1314 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:03:22 · ≈ 11:03 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board, departmental item number two is from planning and development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the county and Montecito Planning Commission's recommendations to approve case numbers 20 ORD 4, 20 OR D5, and 20 ORD 6 which would amend respectively the County Land Use and Development Code The Article 2 Coastal Zoning Ordinance and the Montecito Land Use and Development Code to, one, authorize the temporary suspension of compliance with the project description and or conditions of approval related to certain development standards if necessary to ensure physical distancing and or other public health requirements can be met. Two, allow non-conforming uses to take advantage of this temporary suspension of compliance with development standards As determined to be necessary for the protection of public health related to COVID-19 in order to expand or extend without losing their nonconforming status.

And three, allow time extensions for approved projects due to hardships related to COVID- 19 and the associated economic downturn. And there is a four fifths vote required on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:28 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Thank you Madam Clerk. Ms. Plowman?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:04:32 · ≈ 11:04 AM

Mr. Chair, members of the board, thank you. This item is in response to the COVID-19 restrictions that have been placed on businesses and it complements the program that Public Works has which allows for dining in the right of way As we worked on figuring out the SBPEP program, it occurred to us that there would be businesses and shopping centers in other areas that would not have right-of-way areas to expand into but would be on private property.

And so my team here, Joe Dargle and Tess Harris who have worked very very hard along with County Council staff to bring this forward as quickly as possible. We'll be presenting today the list of items that we are allowing relief from and it will include a time extension for some permits because we do understand that there are people who have permits that may be expiring that have had difficulty getting construction crews to their site So they will walk you through this program, but I just really want to acknowledge their hard work. They've hustled and they did a really great job. So with that, I'm going to hand it over to Ms. Harris and Mr. Darville.

Thank you, Ms. Plowman.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:05:48 · ≈ 11:05 AM

Thanks, Ms Plowman. Ms.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:05:49 · ≈ 11:05 AM

Harris, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:05:50 · ≈ 11:05 AM

All right, today Joe and I will be presenting the COVID-19 Temporary Ordinance Amendments. The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are designed to temporarily allow nonresidential uses to use outdoor areas to ensure proper physical distancing or other public health requirements can be met and to provide other temporary forms of relief. An approval of these ordinance amendments would supersede emergency rule number two, and I'll get into that in a moment.

Just touching on what Miss Plowman said, to encourage the recovery of businesses, restaurants, retail and other community entities. The county's small business and community partnership enhancement program was formed to allow existing permitted uses in newly approved projects to conduct permitted operations within the adjacent public right-of-way. And that's bullet point number one, that's what Public Works has worked on. And then also to provide temporary suspension of conditions of approval and land use regulations. To allow businesses and entities to operate temporarily with an expanded footprint, and that's what we're here before you today for.

And so I'll now go into the proposed ordinance amendments over the next three slides. So the temporary suspension of compliance would authorize the following standards to be suspended, so setbacks, site coverage maximums, minimum open space, parking signs. The requirements that usage shall occur within a completely enclosed building restrictions on use in the right-of-way.

Other development standards as necessary by the director and limitations on food service at wineries and tasting rooms. And I wanted to just touch on that second to last bullet point for a moment. We understand now that we are in stage 3, so this is allowed or wineries are allowed to operate without having to serve food. However if we were to revert back to stage 2 this would allow It's up to your board if you'd like to remove this item from the ordinance amendments at this point or if you'd like to keep them in in case we do revert back to an earlier stage.

So the temporary ordinance amendments for Article 2, the Montecito-Landeson Development Code and the LUDC would add language for the effective date of the ordinance. The ordinance would be effective immediately which is by a four fifths vote is required and would last until December 16th of this year or when the county emergency from COVID 19 is terminated whichever is earlier.

And then the ordinance amendments would also add language that identifies submittal requirements in order to comply with this temporary suspension of development standards. So within 30 days of implementing temporary changes to an approved project, the owner or applicant would need to come in and submit to the director a completed checklist site plan photos and a description of the proposal describing the temporary changes that they're implementing.

They could come, of course, come in sooner as well. And then to be eligible for temporary suspension of compliance, certain requirements must be met including that the approved project would need to be non-residential. That the use doesn't occur within environmentally sensitive habitat. That the use of outdoor areas don't result in the expansion of existing capacity of the business and then that public access shall not be obstructed as well.

Now I'll turn it over to Joe to talk about some additional items in the ordinance amendments.

CommentAnna Marie GottProposed · by introduction2:09:26 · ≈ 11:09 AM

Thank you, Ms. Harris. In addition to the ordinance amendment components Tess just described, P&D proposes to incorporate a hardship time extension for already approved projects where vesting of land use entitlements is delayed due to COVID-19. This provision would provide the Director of Planning and Development the ability to grant up to a 24 month time extension If the request is submitted while this temporary ordinance amendment is in effect.

The proposed ordinance amendments have also been drafted to allow businesses and community entities that are considered non-conforming uses to use this temporary suspension of compliance with certain development standards. Next slide. The proposed ordinance amendments can be found exempt from environmental review based upon CEQA guidelines sections 15301, 15303, 15305 and 15061B3. Next slide.

The proposed ordinance amendments are consistent with county policy as they do not alter the purpose and intent of any policies or development standards of the comprehensive plan including the relevant community plans or the coastal land use plan. Businesses and community entities that would take advantage of this temporary development standard suspension are already existing, have existing services and would not create demand for new services.

The amendments do not authorize any new development or vegetation removal in sensitive habitat areas. The amendments would not generate new development because the construction or erection of new structures is not allowed. And any activities that would be located within or in close proximity to existing developed and cannot result in the expansion of the existing capacity of the business or community entity.

Next slide. Staff recommends that your board make the required findings for approval, determine that the ordinance amendments are exempt from CEQA, read the title and waive further reading of the ordinance, supersede emergency rule number two by adopting the ordinance amendments, and approve the ordinance amendments to the LUDC article 2 and MLUDC We're going to be looking at the case numbers 20 or D 4 20 already 5 and 20 already 6 respectively.

That concludes staff's presentation and we're available for any questions you have thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:42 · ≈ 11:11 AM

Thank you Mister Dargolf is Harris, thank you for your great work on this speedy quick result supervisor Williams

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:11:48 · ≈ 11:11 AM

all move the recommend actions A report at some point of saying, what if any of these things created any negative results? Meaning they didn't. Maybe it's something we should have done anyway and that maybe there are some of these that we would want to leave in place after the disaster if it did not have any negative results. Are there any requests to speak on this item?

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:26 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Chair Hart members of the board we have no request to speak on this item. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:30 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Is there a second for the motion? I'll

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:12:34 · ≈ 11:12 AM

second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:35 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Motion has been made and seconded, any discussion? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:12:39 · ≈ 11:12 AM

Thank you well I'm very grateful for how quickly you did this it's pretty amazing in county council as well. I'm very supportive of continuing with the winery option to serve food even though they do fit into phase three and could reopen. I think they've suffered tremendously from the shutdown, and this may provide additional opportunities especially for locals to visit.

My question has to do with, can we give a date certain or do we, December 16th? Or do we have to say that this expires when the emergency expires if it should expire before. As a business decision it might be nice to have some sense of certainty in other words.

2:13 – 2:1936 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:13:30 · ≈ 11:13 AM

Chair and Supervisors, our recommendation was the bifurcation of December 16th or I mean the earlier of December 16th or the termination of a local emergency. And that was really underscoring the temporary nature of this regulation. The board has the ability to either extend or shorten that time if situations warrant But in crafting this as a temporary zoning code amendment and also in working with the Coastal Commission for a waiver, we felt that was important to have earlier of those two dates in there. So we recommend those two dates.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:14:03 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Okay, so we go with whichever's earlier and much remains to be seen about that. Like Supervisor Williams I'm eager to see what we can learn from this that informs us going forward. So I hope we'll take a step back at some point and do some kind of an assessment about some of these things. A lot of businesses being outside, it just creates a livelier street scene and it can be a more exciting place for everybody kind of a community center in our public spaces.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:14:40 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Thank you Supervisor Hartman any other questions or comments from board members? Would the clerk please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:47 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:14:48 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:50 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:14:52 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:52 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Mr. Williams? Aye. Ms. Hartman? Aye. Chair Hart? Aye Motion passes unanimously. Thank you everyone, Mr. Gazzani?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:15:00 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Chair and Supervisors at the front end of the assembly line for this product we had not with us in person today but here electronically Jenna Richardson Johanna Hartley and Rachel Van Molen and I appreciate all of their work working with the planning staff on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:14 · ≈ 11:15 AM

thank you for your all the contributions of your team to make this happen quickly businesses definitely appreciate it

The next item is departmental item number three. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:26 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board, departmental item number three is from Public Works Board of Directors in the Laguna County Sanitation District. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District ordinance relative to service charges, connection charges and trunk sewer fees and resolution relative to collection of service charges on the tax roll. And this is in the third fourth and fifth districts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:51 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:15:52 · ≈ 11:15 AM

McLaughlin? Yes, good morning Mr. Chair and board members. As the clerk mentioned this is for Laguna Sanitation rate amendments for the next coming year. This is one of three items we have today on rate adjustments and as Public Works has done throughout this COVID season will forego the presentation but for the next two items I will ask the clerk if she could please report on the number of protest votes she has for Laguna.

Thank you Mr. McLaughlin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:16:22 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board. The clerk's office has counted and will be reporting on this item that we've received 11 protests.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:16:31 · ≈ 11:16 AM

11 protests thank you and I think the number for a formal protest for Laguna is 5347 so we're certainly well below that. So we're available for any questions myself Miss Wells and our utility manager Martin Wilder is up in the Better Arabia Government Center as well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:16:47 · ≈ 11:16 AM

All right, thank you very much. Are there any questions of staff? Supervisor- I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:16:51 · ≈ 11:16 AM

have one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:16:52 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:16:54 · ≈ 11:16 AM

I'm just really curious about Mr. McGolpin's pocket protector there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:17:02 · ≈ 11:17 AM

That thing is a work of art. Mr. Chair, Supervisor Lavinino, I'm glad that you can see that on TV. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:12 · ≈ 11:17 AM

It's a branded one. It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:20 · ≈ 11:17 AM

a very effective social distancing device. That's true.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:25 · ≈ 11:17 AM

We

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:17:25 · ≈ 11:17 AM

learned that in engineering school.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:17:29 · ≈ 11:17 AM

Mr Chair,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:31 · ≈ 11:17 AM

Supervisor Adam.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:17:33 · ≈ 11:17 AM

Could I ask a serious question? Which is when would we start construction on this much needed project?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:17:44 · ≈ 11:17 AM

Yes, Mr. Chair and Supervisor Adam, I'm going to leave that to our Utilities Manager Martin Wilder who's up there in Better Avia. We did open up bids and we got some good bids but we should be under construction this summer he can give you the exact first working

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:17:59 · ≈ 11:17 AM

day. Chair Hart and Director Adam, the docket for awarding the contract to WM Lyles is August. We anticipate starting work early October

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:18:13 · ≈ 11:18 AM

That's good, that's good because it's been a long time. We've showed a lot of people that plant and every time somebody complains I always invite them to come out and take a visit and take a look at 1950 era plant that you're continuing to put duct tape and bubble gum on. And make it work, but there's gonna be a vast improvement. It's well worth the extra little bit that we pay for our sewer service to have it well managed. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:49 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Will there be a groundbreaking event planned?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:18:53 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Mr. Chair, absolutely.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:54 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Good, thank you. All right, is there any request to speak on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:18:59 · ≈ 11:18 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, there are no requests to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:03 · ≈ 11:19 AM

All right, is there a motion from the board?

2:19 – 2:2440 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:19:08 · ≈ 11:19 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:09 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Motion's been made. Would Supervisor Adam like to second that motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:14 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:15 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Motion has been made and seconded. Would the clerk please call the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:19 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Mr. Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:21 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:22 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:23 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:25 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Mr Williams? Aye Ms Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:19:28 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:28 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:29 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:30 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:31 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Thank you. The next item is departmental item number 4. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:38 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number four is from Public Works. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding County Service Area 12 Mission Canyon Sewer District ordinance relative to sewer connection charges, sewer services charges and resolution relative to collection of said charges on the tax roll. And this is in the first district.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:59 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Ms. McAulpin

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:20:00 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Yes, Mr. Chair again good morning and this is our second rate item rate adjustment item this morning and again for Mission Canyon sewer rates and again I'll ask the clerk if she could report please on the number of protest votes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:15 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board the clerk's office has counted and we will report that there is one protest on this item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:20:23 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Excellent and the number for formal process would be 403 or more so so we're good. And again, we're available for questions myself miss Wells and our utilities manager Martin Wilder.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:34 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Are there any questions for staff? Is there a motion or excuse me? Or is there any public comment

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:40 · ≈ 11:20 AM

chair Hart members of the board? We have no request to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:44 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Is there a motion on this item move staff recommendation

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:48 · ≈ 11:20 AM

motion

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:49 · ≈ 11:20 AM

made and seconded with the clerk please call the roll.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:53 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Mr. Adam.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:55 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Hi,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:56 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Mr. Lavagnino.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:57 · ≈ 11:20 AM

All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:59 · ≈ 11:20 AM

right, Mr. Williams. Miss Hartman I chair heart motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:05 · ≈ 11:21 AM

and the next item is departmental item number five with the clerk please read that item into the record.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:21:10 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board departmental item number five is from Public Works. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding solid waste tipping fees collection rates and parcel fees for fiscal year 2020-2021

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:24 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Thank you Mr. McLaughlin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:21:26 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Yes, Mr. Chair and board members our final item today deals with our tipping fees for Taheegus and all of our Solo Ways fees throughout the year again myself Ms. Wells and the gentleman on the end there Thomas Charity who works with all of our haulers and does a great job we're available for questions

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:44 · ≈ 11:21 AM

thank you very much are there questions of staff? Are there any requests

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:21:50 · ≈ 11:21 AM

excuse me Supervisor Williams I was just going to, because we occasionally get questions about rates and I just think it's important to indicate that though these rates reflect the cost of the Tahecus Resource Recovery Project which will dramatically It is also a reflection of avoided costs of earlier landfill closure, which would be equivalent in expense as my understanding. So I wanted to put that out there so you can confirm or deny that in a way so that the public understands We would have gotten the increase one way or another just depending on which road we took.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:56 · ≈ 11:22 AM

Who wants to comment? Ms. Wells?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:22:58 · ≈ 11:22 AM

So Supervisor Williams, through the Chair, yes that's absolutely true what Supervisor Williams has brought up. I also want to raise the point that the state passed some pretty critical regulations a couple years ago related to the need to capture organics from the waste stream. And we were recently spoke speaking to a consultant who's going to be helping us with our franchise agreements that are going to be expiring soon.

He indicated he's been doing this for 30 years and Typically if they go out to bid, they'll see like a 30% reduction in cost anywhere from 10-30%. Over the last two years they've seen increases up to 40%, and in large part it's this requirement related to the organics. That it needs to be collected and managed. And so these hauling companies are now having to include the cost of developing composting and anaerobic digester facilities. So we're a bit ahead of the game, but now statewide rates are increasing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:10 · ≈ 11:24 AM

It's good news that we are ahead of the curve. That's always a good place to be. Are there any public comment on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:24:17 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have no request to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:20 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Thank you. Is there a motion from the Board? Move staff recommendation. Motion has been made. Is there a second?

2:24 – 2:269 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:24:30 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:31 · ≈ 11:24 AM

Thank you. Any comments? Any discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:24:35 · ≈ 11:24 AM

No I just think that if if there are any members of the public who are unfortunately negatively impacted by these rates, there is one other Outlet, which is Cal Recycle and the governor. I mean a lot of our costs are dependent on fact that every bit of tonnage is being counted towards a premature closure of the landfill. It's a closure that is welcomed by the people in the neighborhood very understandable.

You know, I might welcome it too if Lived up at Tejigas, but it also creates a cost for the body politic. So if there is some angst on the part of the public, there is one place besides Public Works and the Board of Supervisors that you could petition which is CalRecycle. CalRecycle has been very stringent upon us Not even allowing the tonnage from the debris flow to go out of our counted tonnage.

And so that is definitely I'm going to ask the clerk to call the roll.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:26:28 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:29 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.852:26:31 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:31 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Mr. Williams? Aye. Ms. Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:35 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:35 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Motion passes unanimously.

2:26 – 5:365 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:37 · ≈ 11:26 AM

We'll now recess to closed session County Council would you please read the items for consideration

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:26:43 · ≈ 11:26 AM

Chair and the board today in closed session. The board is agendized for public employee performance evaluations for 13 appointed department heads, agricultural commissioner, behavioral wellness, child support services, community services, fire general services, human resources planning and development probation, public defender, public health, public works and social services.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:27:06 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Thank you. And what approximately how long do you estimate we will be?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:27:13 · ≈ 11:27 AM

At least an hour.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:27:15 · ≈ 11:27 AM

Okay, we'll reconvene then no sooner than 1230 We are now reconvening the meeting of June 16th, 2020. Will County Council please report after closed session?

5:36 – 5:372 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:36:34 · ≈ 2:36 PM

Chair and supervisors, today in closed session the board considered public employee performance evaluations for 13 appointed department heads, Agricultural Commissioner, Behavioral Wellness, Child Support Services, Community Services, Fire, General Services, Human Resources, Planning and Development, Probation, Public Defender, Public Health, Public Works and Social Services. There are no reportable actions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:36:58 · ≈ 2:36 PM

Thank you Mr. Guzzone. We'll now adjourn to Tuesday July 7th 2020