UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:03 – 0:1233 turns
I'll call to order the August 18th, 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Will the clerk please call the roll?
Mr. Adam? Good morning. Can North County hear us? Good morning. Can North County hear us? Mr Adam?
We can indeed.
Great thank you I will take that as a here. Mr. Lavinino?
Here.
Mr. Williams?
Here.
Ms. Hartman? Here Chair Hart?
The next item of business is approval of the minutes of July 14th and July 16th. Is there any discussion? Could I have a motion?
Move approval.
Second. Motion has been made and seconded, any discussion? Clerk would you please call the roll?
Mr. Adams
I have
two items to report.
This Friday at 5 p.m. is the deadline for the public to apply to serve on the 11-person Independent Redistricting Commission, which will be tasked with adjusting the boundaries of the county supervisorial districts through a public process. It will be based on the 2020 federal census expected by mid 2021 and by law, the commission will be seated by December 31st of this year. So again, the deadline is this Friday at 5 pm. Residents interested could look at our website For qualifications and criteria, along with the application countyofsb.org backslash redistricting. It's also on our homepage.
So just a reminder. The second item today is I've asked Assistant County Executive Officer Barney Malakian to give the board a quick update on the power outages that we're seeing or could be seeing. So Mr. Malakia?
Thank you Chair Hart, members of the board. Real quickly as everyone is aware the county and indeed the western United States has been experiencing a significant heat event since last weekend this event is projected to continue at least through Thursday in response to that I'm talking a minute about some of the outages that occurred over the weekend But in response to that, CAISO, the California Independent System Operators who control essentially the electrical grid in California have issued what is referred to as a flex alert.
That alert period has currently started last Sunday evening and extended through 10 p.m. tomorrow night. Residents are asked in their homes to turn off all necessary lights, to use any major appliances before 3 p. m. or after 10 p and to set your air conditioners for 78 degrees or higher. Demands were expected to be highest Monday and Tuesday, although yesterday we weren't subject to an alert. I'll talk about that process in a second but there were no rolling outages reported in the state as of yesterday.
It is...I think everyone is aware that in the North County area served by Pacific Gas and Electric, there were significant outages over the weekend. Approximately 23,000 customers were without power for a period of time. None of those were related to the rolling blackouts or to a public safety power shutdown but rather due to lightning strikes and transformer malfunctions.
The CAISO alert system is based on the following. When an alert is called, the areas that may be affected are notified by 3 p.m., the day prior to the potential effect. Utilities will notify potential impacted city and county elected officials, chief executive office, and offices of emergency management. A warning is issued on the same day as the potential shortage. The notification process is the same, but it is worth noting that after that warning is issued a shutoff could occur without further notification.
When the outages occur they are scheduled to last for one hour in each particular area before
moving on to the next area and to not exceed 90 minutes. Customers on critical care, that is who are energy dependent on life support will likely not receive backup as part of that system is to ensure that they have a two hour battery backup. I will note that over the weekend, the Fire Department did do safety checks on several people in the North County to ensure their well-being.
With regards to communication, both Office of Emergency Management and the CEO Public Information Officer have actively been pushing information on social media Ready SBC org has been updated extensively in both English and Spanish. And a public health department press release on finding air conditioning spaces while being safe during COVID has also been issued. And with that, I'll stop and answer any questions the board may have. Thank you Mr. Malikian for the report.
Questions from board members? Supervisor Williams
Well, obviously we have a lot of facilities. We are shutting down non-essential energy use as well at 3
o'clock? That is correct. Yesterday and today the air conditioning systems in county buildings have been turned off and will be turned back on at 4am the following day. Great. And is
there any kind of outreach that we're attempting to do towards other large employers, other large energy users?
We have pushed out the state's messaging as well as our own messaging through all the avenues that I described. I don't know that we have done specific targeted outreach to a given employer. And I'm sure
some of them are aware of it but You see us be even though it's not physically in session. It's a massive energy user. There are there are some specific large energy users that we have you know, in the county
and Supervisor Williams I neglected to include in my briefing that every day there is an outside or an operating area briefing call And UCSB and other governmental entities are on that call. Great, Supervisor Hartman?
Thank you. I just wanted to clarify, in the Santa Ynez Valley on Saturday our power was out for eight hours plus and it was 107 degrees but what I'm asking is you're saying that that was not part of Queso's rolling blackout? That was simply a breakdown of equipment due to lightning storm?
Lightning storms and subsequent transformer failures is what we've been told
Okay, so that means that anything that's managed would only be between 60 and 90 minutes. And people who are especially sensitive to the heat can plan for that, manage for that. But when it gets to be eight hours on a really hot day, that's dangerous for many people. Okay, thank you. You're
welcome.
Any other questions for Mr. Milliken?
Well, I have a comment up here in Santa Maria. Yes, Supervisor Adam. Our farm had a bunch of pumps out for a long time and we had to curtail planting and you know, I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Everybody else had the same problem because when those lightning strikes hit the transformers which is usually what happens It takes them a long time to get all those transformers changed out, and hopefully they have enough of them to do it. So this is just prime example of why you want to have a measure of redundancy and really well-maintained system so that when these kind of problems occur They don't become catastrophic because if it's off for three or four days, that's gonna affect the food supply for the nation.
So we should just keep that in mind as we go through life here.
Thank you Supervisor Adam. All right anything else? Do you have anything else for your CEO
report? Nothing else to report.
The next item is approval of the administrative agenda.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
Do any board members request to pull items on the administrative agenda? I know Supervisor Hartman needs a separate vote on A23. Adam Clerk?
Chair?
Yeah, I need
31. 31.
And Supervisor Lavinino's A15. Okay
and then the public members?
Chair Hart, members of the board. I have requests on items A11 and A20 and when we do have a moment, I have a couple announcements on today's agenda as well. Okay why don't you
go ahead make those announcements now?
Great thank you. Chair Hart, members of the board first I'd like to remind members of the public who are participating today of our alternative method of public participation for our board meetings. As you will see scrolling on the top of your screen right now if you would like to make a comment by phone please call 805-568 2240 again that's 805-568-2240 and state your name, your phone number and which item you would like to speak on. And the clerk will call you at the appropriate time.
I'd also like to remind the public to please make every effort to be available and to mute all streaming devices once it is your turn to speak. Additionally, we post an addendum to this agenda today on Friday August 14th. And the first item is in addition to our closed session for on page 2 of the addendum which is conference with real property negotiators government code section 54956.8 And County Council will read this into the record prior to the moment that we recessed a closed session.
Additionally, we added an item to our administrative agenda, Administrative Item Number 67 from Community Services. It is to consider recommendations regarding agreements with United Way of Santa Barbara County to implement an emergency rental assistance program and disaster assistance program utilizing CARES Act funds. And we do have a request to trail this item till after departmental item number one.
Additionally, we had a request to trail administrative item number 44 till after departmental item number two and I will go ahead and read that item into the record now. That item is from Public Works Board of Directors in the Laguna County Sanitation District. It is to consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District wastewater Reclamation plant phase one upgrade and fund balance policy, and this is in the third and fourth districts. And just a reminder we had a request to trail that after departmental item number two. And my last announcement this morning I do have a quick announcement on administrative item number 33 when we get to that item Chair Hart and that is from Excuse me human resources. It is to consider recommendations regarding a performance-based salary adjustment for County Council
Thank you very much for those announcements and supervisor Hartman did you have That's
okay,
all right so the first item we have then as a 11 is that right? There's not one for a 10. Yes a 10 okay
Yes, Chair Hart, members of the board. Administrative item number 10 is from behavioral wellness. It is to consider recommendations regarding alcohol and drug prevention services contract renewals with fighting back Santa Maria Valley fiscal year 2020 through 2022 future leaders of America fiscal year 2020 through 2022 and Santa Ana's valley people helping people fiscal year 2020 through 2022 Mr. Caldwell And chair Hart members of the board I have a record that supervisor Hartman wanted to pull this item.
OK
well we did get a letter from Mr. Caldwell and I just thought behavioral wellness might want to respond to that if we have anybody who can.
Supervisor Hartman This is John Doyle from County Behavioral Wellness, Alcohol and Drug Programs. I'm here representing Alice Gleghorn as well as Pam Fisher on this item.
Thank you Mr. Doyle Could you please maybe the what if we have the public commenter on the line? We do not okay. Well there. I don't know if you saw the email from Mr.. Caldwell Asking questions about the contract and the services specifically for the community of Lompoc. That was his concern. And I don't know if you know anything about the service providers that are proposed for Lompoc, Mr. Doyle?
Yes Chair Hart and members of the board these are our primary prevention contracts and from what I can gather there was a concern that one Prevention, primary prevention contractors that we have future leaders of America might be engaging in lobbying or political activity. We've worked with FLA I've looked at this very closely including reviewing their contract. We've worked with FLA and they understand they cannot use county funding for politics or lobbying and be well will work with FLA and all prevention providers to ensure that they're not doing so in meeting all the requirements of the Hatch Act, which is part of their contracts.
Thank you for that Mr. Gazzani.
Chair and supervisors, and we had looked at this with behavior wellness. And just for the public, the contract at pages 27 and 35 has expressed prohibitions concerning both the Hatch Act and the Byrd anti-lobbying amendment and behavioral wellness is very aware of that. And we did talk with them about practical steps to ensure compliance.
Thank you for that additional information. Are there any other questions for staff from board members? We do have a public comment sounds like yes.
Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board. Andy Caldwell did want to speak on A10 and not A11 so we will go to public comment now thank you.
Thank you.
Members of the Board this is Andy Caldwell representing Colab As you know, I researched this and sent all of you an email about it. I understand that all of these organizations are worthwhile organizations. And I wouldn't even mind you giving money to future leaders of America under other circumstances But my complaint is this I went through the entire future leaders of America website and their work is outstanding in terms of prepping kids for college and all that sort of stuff. But it just seems completely and totally out of their wheelhouse that they are going to be the contract provider for provision of substance abuse prevention services in the entire county And one of the things about the organization is it looks like their entire client base or people they serve and all their staff are Hispanic.
They have a spectacularly singular focus on serving Latino or Hispanic youth, and that's all fine but the question is why are they the contract provider for the entire South County? The other one standing as Valley people helping people they seem to be doing a good job. This does seem to be something they do but they by their own admission on their own Web site. They offer limited services to the Lompoc Valley.
I don't have to tell you that the Lompoc Valley is hurting and it needs not short shrift but full on service Fighting back Santa Maria Valley. They seem to have been created for this, among other things. So again I don't care if you give future leaders of America money for the work they're doing but I don't see how you can justify giving them this money under this contract and I have to ask you what about Lompoc? Because fighting back Santa Maria Valley, Lompoc's not listed under their area The entire South County is not listed under the Service Area of Future Leaders of America as to who they serve, and Lompoc's left out of the San Ynez Valley people helping people. You need to find better organizations for the Lompoc Valley and the rest of the South County.
Thank you.
Thank you Mr. Caldwell Mr Doyle, can you add any additional information to answer Mr Caldwell's questions about service provided in Lompoc?
Certainly Chair Hart, members of the board and Mr. Caldwell your points are very well taken. We provide primary prevention services in all three regions of the county and we have three providers doing so. In South County we have Future Leaders of America In Lompoc and West County, we have people helping people and then we have fighting back up in Santa Maria. I think we do need more services in Lompoc. I take
0:22 – 0:2822 turns
that really seriously. Lompoc is an area that needs a lot of services. We will reach out to Lompok and the people helping people to provide more services All of these contracts were awarded on a very competitive RFP proposal and process. So we established the process, and we have had some very good bids, some very good proposals, and FLA won one of those proposals.
We find a tremendous gap in services for Latin American individuals as well as families In South County. I just want to assure people we're talking, I think about two things whether all of our prevention providers any of our prevention providers are going to engage in lobbying and political activities and what about the gaps in services in Lompoc? Is FLA responding to that? FLA will not respond to the services in Lompoc. That's not their region. Their region is going to be South County.
The Lompoc area, which is Lompoc and Santa Ynez has people helping people. So I take this seriously. I think that Mr. Caldwell has a great point that we need more services in Lompoc and we will provide those services by hook or by crook. In closing, I just want to also say that there's a certain mandated Requirement that certain funding be given or carved out of a block grant that comes from Washington SAMHSA for primary prevention services. And what I have done is I have increased the minimum by close to $100,000 in that because I think that prevention is very important.
So thank you.
Thank you Mr. Goyal for that additional information, I think that helps address the issue that Lompoc is going to get additional services. You're going to work with the provider to make sure that people helping people are providing services in the community of Lompoc where they are needed. Any other questions on this item? Yes, Supervisor Adam.
Thank you. Mr Doyle, just so I'm clear, People Helping People contract specifically mentions Lompoc and that's in their area right?
Yes that is in their area. I don't know if it specifically mentions Lompoc, I would have to check it but we always consider West to include Lompoc I will ensure that if it isn't in the contract, I will amend the contract. But they are supposed to provide services throughout the 3rd District, throughout Lompoc as well as San Dines. The Lompoc and San Dines area.
Okay very good thank you. And then Mr Doyle just a question from Steve. So the question about whether or not this fits into FLA's kind of umbrella How long have they had this contract to do this type of activity?
Two years.
Two years, okay and it looked like your report showed I mean you guys are actually going in and checking and making sure that they follow up with the parameters that you've given them so there is somebody overlooking this contracting side B well
Yes, Supervisor Lavanino, members of the board. We monitor almost to a fault. We are very active in monitoring all providers. We monitor them closely. We're always paying attention to what they're doing. We monitor them sometimes monthly, sometimes quarterly. We look at their fiscal reports. We look at their staffing reports. We look at their service deliverables And we're very, very much concerned with management and oversight in all areas of alcohol and drug programs as well as prevention. Having said that, as I said before, we will make special efforts to work with FLA to ensure that they are not engaging in any politics or any lobbying. We take a strict separation between prevention and policy in our department.
Okay, great. Well if there's no other questions I'll make a motion to move 815.
Thank you is there a second? Second. Motion has been made and seconded any discussion? Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?
Chair Hart
and members of the
board.
Oh I'm sorry 10 10 10. 810. Sorry
I messed up. Mr. Adam?
Aye.
Mr Lavinino?
Aye. I
miss Hartman I chair heart.
I
motion passes unanimously
and the next item for discussion is item a 15.
0:28 – 0:357 turns
Chair Hart members of the board administrative item number 15 is from the clerk recorder assessor it is to consider recommendations regarding the coronavirus aid relief and economic securities cares act contract.
Is there a Supervisor Letino?
Yes. I pulled this item just because of, you know, I think it's a national story of people Starting to worry about whether a mail-in election is secure. I thought it was a good opportunity for Mr. Holland, I had a conversation with him yesterday that I'm not sure. I think a lot of it is the fact that maybe we're not getting enough information out to the public to let them know how secure our election is. But I think it's a good opportunity to let Mr. Holland kind of explain how our process is going to work this year.
Thank you Supervisor Lavendino. Is Mr. Holland on the line?
Yes, Supervisor Lavagnino through the chair. Can you hear me?
Yes thank you very much.
Okay well thanks for the opportunity. As you all may very well know the governor signed an executive order in June making California and all vote by mail election for November 3rd and this was of course with COVID in mind, in March we had 86 polling places and most of those polling places were not conducive to providing safe voting. So the governor wants the state to go all vote by mail and so we're currently doing that.
In Santa Barbara County, we've been 75% to 80% vote-by-mail for a number of years now. So, for us to increase from 180,000 vote by mail to 230,000 is not a real heavy lift for us so we're confident we can do that and handle that securely. The postal workers and the post office they are really our partners in this and they do a tremendous job So I really want to give a shout out to them. You know, they're really the frontline workers in an all vote by mail election. The, um, I know there was some concern that there was some mailboxes or drive-through mailbox removed on Patterson Avenue in Goleta and I'm here to let you know that that that mailbox has now been replaced with two mailboxes.
It was removed apparently Because it was damaged. And so when we heard about that, we have the post office on speed dial. So we called them up and they told us it was damaged and that they were working to replace that just at their earliest convenience. So with this new election model going all vote by mail there's a number of opportunities for people to return their vote-by-mail ballot.
The number one of course is Have your postal workers return it. Now for a number of years, the post office has always recommended that you mail your vote by mail ballot in seven days before the election and so I think that message is still consistent. So what you wanna do is you wanna vote early. Give the post office a chance to get those mail ballots back But additionally, things that we're doing to make it easier for you to return your vote by mail ballot. We have three offices that are open 29 days before the election where you can walk in, you can get a replacement ballot, you can drop off your vote-by-mail ballot at any one of our three offices, Long Polk, Santa Maria or Santa Barbara.
In addition to that, we have purchased 33 or 32 actually, vote by mail drop boxes. And those are going to be spread out across the county for folks to directly deliver their vote-by-mail ballot by dropping it off in one of these county ballot drop boxes and so that will deliver your vote-by mail ballot directly to our County Elections Office and those will be open 29 days before the election So we're gonna try and get all our vote by mail ballots into the mail system sometime the week before October 5th, which is the 29th day before the election. So people can start voting on that 29th day before the election, which is October 5th.
One of the other things that we're doing with this, that was part of the governor's executive order was because we couldn't handle the 80, because our 86 polling places didn't provide enough spacing to provide safe voting. They asked for counties to go to what they call an in-person voting location mechanism and so what we are doing is we're identifying 37 voting locations or 36 voting locations for The four days leading up to and including election day. So Saturday, October 31st Sunday and Monday these 36 in-person voting locations will be open for eight hours. And then on Tuesday they will be open normal hour seven to eight. So we're providing lots of opportunities for people to return their vote by mail ballots and get them in.
Kind of our motto is vote safe and vote early. Please get those ballots in as early as you can, and discussing this with Supervisor Lavagnino he asked so what's one of the biggest challenges to voting by mail? And really one of the biggest challenges is when people do not sign their return envelope or they sign it sloppily and then it doesn't match the signature we have on file And then we have to outreach those voters and get them to correct that, which delays things. So again, vote safe, vote early and please sign your ballot return envelope responsibly.
0:35 – 0:4025 turns
Thank you, Mr. Holland. I understand that this new approach is going to require additional poll workers and that you are actively recruiting folks for those that role and do you have a phone number that the public could contact or an email address that you could direct them to take advantage of this opportunity for employment?
Yeah 1-800 SBC vote or sbcvote.com
perfect thank you very much
and yes we're gonna need 15 to 20 workers at each one of these in-person voting locations. So if you do the math, that's 500 to 600 poll workers we need to work for four days. So it's gonna be quite the challenge. It's quite different than anything we've done in the past.
Thank you for that.
Supervisor Williams? Well, I definitely always urge people to mail in early. But just in California law, I'm curious what happens to those ballots that have been postmarked by Election Day but come in a day or two afterwards but before certification of the election?
Very good question Supervisor Williams through the chair at the If they are postmarked by election day, we have up to 17 days after an election to receive that. And if it is postmarked on election day, that ballot will be counted.
And is that true in California only and not in other states? So is this a different issue elsewhere?
I believe the 17 days is actually brand new. It used to be postmark plus three but they had just brand new law. It's been allowed 17 days. Other states do this, but I'm not sure what their limit is in terms of how late they can be delivered after election day.
Well again, I think we need to urge people to do it early but and and I know it's a. It's a staffing challenge for you to have so many vote by mail ballots and obviously even more of a staffing challenge when they come in late. But we really appreciate your work to obviously protect the sanctity of our democracy.
Yeah well thank you for that and the other part about voting early is people criticize voting by mail because If you turn in your ballots late, then we have to process those after election. If you get them to us days before the election, we can process those and then they will go into the account on election night. So that's one of the benefits of getting your ballot in early.
Mr. Chair I have
a
question? Yes Supervisor Lavenino.
Thank you. So, Mr. Holland so there's been I think in the last election might have been the first one when I might be wrong but the idea of ballot harvesting I know people have really had some heartburn with There was a possibility that the law might be changed. And for those that don't know what that is, that's where an individual goes and collects other people's ballots. Has the law stayed the same? What are the rules and what should people look out for?
Yeah, the law is still the same so you are allowed to do that. We really don't see much of any of that. What we typically find is that For a given household, if you let's say have four voters there that one person may come in and drop off all four ballots. And previously the law against harvesting was really kind of meaningless because anybody could have just taken creditable voted ballots and just put them in a blue mailbox.
So And again, we're really just not seeing anything beyond really households just delivering ballots from that household.
But they all do have to be signed no matter what that has to have the signature on each one?
Absolutely and it's so easy to do. Just sign that envelope and we'll count that ballot.
All right any other questions?
I have a question
yes Supervisor Adam
Yeah, Mr. Holland, when's the last time we cleaned out the voter rolls?
Supervisor Adam through the chair. We are in constant list maintenance of the voter rolls so you might have noticed that you just got a card in the mail. We sent that card out to everybody and all registered voters in the county and if it comes back as undeliverable We moved them to the inactive role. So we are in constant state of list maintenance of our voter registration rolls, daily.
Have you ever audited a set of like a precinct or something and gone out and actually confirmed each person is there?
You mean went out and knocked on their door? We've never done anything like that
0:40 – 0:4712 turns
Okay. Maybe, maybe that might be a good idea.
Okay. I'll take that into consideration.
All right. If there are any more, are there any more questions for Mr. Holland? I don't see anything. Thank you again for being available and for answering these questions and reassuring our residents that the election is being carefully planned for and that all Contingencies are being considered and you are ready to take their ballots as early as possible, soon as they're available.
And that way folks can be assured that their ballot will be counted prior to election day and readied for publication on election day itself. So thank you very much for- Thank you. Being with us Mr. Holland. Let's see we can hang onto this and vote on it as a group.
The next item is item number 20 is that right?
Guest Chair Hart and members of the Board, Administrative Item number 20 is from Community Services. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Project Roomkey COVID-19 Homeless Task Force response and requests to ratify execution of a contract with Santa Barbara Hotel Group and a First Amendment of an executed professional services contract with PATH. And we have one request to speak on this item and that is Andy Caldwell.
Chair Hart, members of the board. I'm Andy Caldwell representing COLAB. We have a lot of questions on this particular item. One of the most important items for your board especially with regard to your finances is does this trigger any federal or state laws that once you create a home or a domicile for the homeless that you can never take that away? So for instance in the Lompoc Riverbed one of the problems Lompoc had was clearing out the 100 to 150 people that lived in that river bed some of which lived there 15 years. They had to find an alternative location for them they couldn't quote unquote dump them back onto the streets we would like to know if you do this are you creating a requirement to provide housing for them forever after?
The other question we know that there's people who are out homeless through absolutely no fault of their own lost their job. They had cancer a single mom left with kids as a result of a divorce things like that. How are you price prioritizing who gets these this room or is it people that if they just got a room they're going to be OK and they're gonna get back on their feet How are you prioritizing who gets the rooms and the bottom line. The other question we have is what about the rest of the county Santa Maria and Lompoc have homeless problems.
Is this another issue where the county is going to spend a million dollars on the South County homeless. I'll admit you've probably got more homeless in Santa Barbara than the rest of the county combined but again Where is the North County version of this, especially like I said, Lompoc is continually to struggle with the riverbed because the people are moving back in.
And the other one finally is what are those services and the monitoring that's going to take place? The modern day theory is we throw a house at these people they're going to get better. I'd like to know to what degree as they're going to be drug alcohol and mental health To these people and that they'll be expected to quote unquote apply themselves to end the rest of the cycle of homelessness that's pervasive in their lives.
Thank you
Thank you Mr. Caldwell for those good questions, Mr. Chaptions here to answer. Good
morning Chair Hart and members of the board I'll try to answer as many questions as I can we did look at sites in Lompoc we looked at a number of sites in North County just couldn't find any hotel owners that were willing to lease out space for us for this purpose so it's really really difficult even in South County we barely found this one As a room key site.
So that was one of the issues we had during the covid crisis and this is a crisis. We do have congregate services up there. Good Sam, to provide congregate services to folks up there who are experiencing homelessness. So there are services there and Be Well was providing services. We had a number of services for homeless people both in Roomkey South and in North County.
So we did focus on both Lompoc, Santa Maria, and South County for services. Now we have housed 30 people from the Roomkey South which is tremendous really given the emergency. And we still have some people there I think Mr. Caller is right, there are some who weren't abiding by the rules and we've dealt with those so staff has been dealing with those as well.
I forgot what the other questions were or what would trigger it? I think looking at the health order if they are 65 and older, if they're considered at risk to contract COVID, we move them to the non-congregate setting which is the Roomkey South. So that was the trigger in terms of how we prioritized who got and who didn't. And we did plenty of outreach, a lot of outreach in the homeless community with United Way and some of the other outreach providers to bring people into non-congregate shelter setting.
And Mr. Caldwell's first question was, is there any requirement that is triggered by providing the hotel
rooms? Yes, Chair Hart. We work with County Council when this emergency first hit. We don't think so because it was an emergency in any other setting. It would have been if they were living somewhere for 30 days. I think they have tenancy rights. That wasn't the case in this emergency.
Okay. Thank you for those answers. Are there additional questions from Mr. Chapman? Okay, thank you very much for that. I think we'll go on to item number 23.
Yes, Chair Hart and members of the Board, Administrative Item Number 23 is from County Council. It is to consider recommendations regarding an outside council contract with the Sutton Law Firm, and there's a 4 fifths vote required on this item.
0:47 – 0:5321 turns
Supervisor Hartman?
Yes, Mr. Chair I need to recuse myself this firm has done some legal work on my behalf and that could give rise to a disqualifying personal financial
Can we get a motion to approve this item?
So moved
motions been made and I'll second it any discussion Roll call vote please
Mr.. Adam
Hi,
mr. Lavagnino All
right The
motion passes 4 to 1 with one abstention. Chair Hart and members of the board, administrative item number 31 is from general services. It is to consider recommendations regarding a new probation headquarters building project and professional services agreement PSA for conceptual design and programming project number 19014, and this is in the first district.
And did Supervisor Williams? Supervisor Adam?
My mic is, there we go. Am I on now?
Yes, go right ahead please.
Okay, so the reason I pulled this is because I realize this has been on the books for quite a while but it just occurred to my office that the workforce is evolving at the moment and it seems to be dispersing. And we just don't know what it's gonna look like in a year. And I just suggest maybe that we want to hold off on this because once we spend a quarter of a million dollars, we're kinda if nothing else mentally committed to doing something and spending more. And I just wonder if in a year something with a much smaller footprint or in a different spot might actually You know, for different purposes as we evolve in our work at probation might be more appropriate.
And so maybe we should wait a year and the other reason is that public participation is difficult at this point and I think If we waited a year, this COVID business will likely be over and it'll be easier for the public to participate in any case.
Thank you Supervisor Adam. Are there other questions or comments on this item? Supervisor Williams.
Well, I know this has been very important for the probation which I would just say that this disaster and stuff every shows we have a very. Pragmatic Department with competent leadership I'm not worried about commissioning a unnecessary building for and it would facilitate. That is really underutilized at this time and it's really frankly a waste of a resource that the taxpayers in the county have in their possession.
And so I just think that there's a lot of reasons to go forward with this. With
representative from the probation department
like to speak for general services. Good morning, Patrick Sarosky assistant director of General Services. And Chair Hart and the board, thank you for giving us the opportunity. We've been working with probation for roughly the last year in putting together a request for proposal to move forward with this important initiative. We'll certainly take into consideration our new operating paradigm. I think it's imperative across the county for us to look at all sorts of alternative ways of delivering services, and I think it's important we're just about to enter into a programming effort with probation that will call out exactly what our space needs are going to be and exactly how they ultimately want to deliver services. So what we're experiencing now I think is gonna have a ripple effect across our design process on not only this facility, but facilities in the future.
So it's certainly something that we're going to take into consideration and I'm sure we'll get a lot of discussion as we move through the programming process. Thank you Mr. Swarovski for those assurances.
And Chair Hart members of the board, I do have Damon Fletcher from probation on the line if you'd like to hear from the department or if Supervisor Adam has any specific questions for him.
Mr. Fletcher would you like to add anything? Or Supervisor Adam, do you have any particular questions?
Well, no I actually don't and that's because my crystal ball is broken and I can't determine what work is going to look like at this point in a year. So if Mr. Fletcher has a working crystal ball maybe he could tell us.
0:53 – 0:5616 turns
Mr. Fletcher? Mister Fletcher were you able to hear supervisor Adam?
Chair Hart, Supervisor Adams. David Fletcher with the Probation Department. Can you hear me
yes we can
yeah OK so one of the things that came up with probation after the. After COVID hit is we did talk to or sent an email We're in charge of this project from General Services for us about changes that we might make into the design of the building based on COVID. However, probation is one of the departments in the county who because of the nature of our work can't close our doors and we have been open throughout the entire impact to this pandemic. And so while it is something that we are mindful And we will discuss as we go through this programming process related to the new building, the need to co-locate all of our staff and the efficiencies that will result because of it are still a priority for probation.
Thank you, Mr. Fletcher and I know that with the ongoing efforts to divert people out of the criminal justice system, the probation department has a key role to play in that work and in fact your responsibilities have increased during this period of time and that's likely to continue into the future so of all the departments that we might be considering a building for there is an increasing need for staff and space for them.
Any other questions for staff? All right, maybe we should take this item now since I think there will be different votes. Would someone like to make a motion? I'll move the item. Motion's been made and seconded. Any discussion? Roll call please.
Mr. Adam?
No.
Mr. Lavinino?
Aye.
Mr Williams?
Aye.
Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?
Aye
Motion passes 4-1
All right, and our next one item I don't recall was 39 pulled?
Chair Hart, members of the board. Our next item is my quick announcement on Administrative Item number 33. And this is coming from Human Resources. It is to consider recommendations regarding a performance-based salary adjustment for county council, and the board has agendized to consider approving a 2.5% performance-based salary increase for county council for a new annual salary of about $240,720 which would be effective on August 24th 2020.
0:56 – 1:0029 turns
Thank you for that announcement.
And Chair Hart, although FPPC regulation 18704 says I may remain seated for this item, I instead will recuse and leave the room. Thank you. All
right are there any questions? Or comments from board members? Our motion.
We have a very hardworking and diligent county council, and I believe that this is appropriate. And happy to move the recommendation.
Thank you. The motion's been made. Seconded. And seconded. Any discussion? Roll call vote please.
Mr. Adam.
Aye. All right
Mister Williams
I
miss Hartman I chair heart.
I
motion passes unanimously.
And then again, I can't recall is was 39 full.
Chair Hart, members of the board. I don't have a record of administrative item number 39 being pulled but... Okay.
I think we are okay then and the other two items that will be trailed will be trailing item number 44 to D2 and will be trailing item number 67 to D1 so could I get a motion for the balance of the administrative agenda?
So moved.
Motion's been made And seconded. Second. Roll call please.
Mr. Adam.
Aye.
Mr. Lavinino.
Aye.
Mr Williams?
Aye.
Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?
Aye
motion passes unanimously
and now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the agenda today madam clerk are there any requests to speak
Mister chair before you go there I just wanted to thank you for a couple items and highlight them as a group instead of just. There was a number of things on the agenda today that this board I just wanted to say thank you for all of the work that you've been doing. Particularly in my district and I just thought it would be inappropriate for that to pass without thanking you. You know, for those that were watching the agenda. It nearly a million There was forward progress on the Lower Mission Creek project with where Mr. Hart and my destinies are intertwined, and there was the EIR for the Randall Road debris basin which has been you know my holy grail for I just wanted to take a moment on behalf of the people of the first district think the board and the county.
And thank you for your strong advocacy for those projects that wouldn't have had gotten the momentum that they deserve without your strong voice and support. All right, so our next item is public comment.
1:00 – 1:0710 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board we have no request to speak on general public comment today.
Which brings us to department item number one with the clerk please read that item into the record.
Chair Hart and members of the board departmental item number one is from the county executive office, it is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update.
Welcome Dr. Donenoso and Dr. Anzorg. Ms. Anderson's here too as well. I think you have some very important news to share today.
Good morning chair, members of the board. It's been a few weeks since I've been here to give you an update. Today's meeting topics will include a brief overview recap of our county data some conversations about CDPH monitoring status as well as some good news about school waivers This graph describes the number of cases in our county. So as of yesterday, we have 7454 total cases. Our number of active cases is 278 and this marks an 11.6% over the two week period.
This graph describes the new cases for the past two weeks, city by city. And I'd like to point out some significant information on this graph. As you can see, the top line describes the disease transmission in Santa Maria and Over a two-week period, we see a 41% decrease in new cases. And that is significant. The second significant change is the red line, this red line.
And this describes Santa Barbara's experience which has seen a 25% decrease over a two week period. The purple line describes Lompoc, and we are seeing a 38% decrease over the last two weeks. What's concerning is Goleta, which is the purple line that is at the near bottom. Goleta has increased by 18%, going from 39 cases to 46 Most concerning is Isla Vista.
Isla Vista has increased 255% going from 22 cases to 78 cases during this two week period. We believe that this is reflective of the students coming back. The high density housing in the community, increased social movements and gatherings in Isla Vista. This graph describes our hospitalizations for COVID patients. Reflective of the state's trends, we are seeing a decrease in hospitalization rates 24%. Our med surge rates decreased by 32% and ICU rates decreased by four.
I'd like to spotlight a particular Demographics among our cases. Yesterday, the World Health Organization reported that it was concerned that COVID spread was being driven by people in their 20's 30's and 40's many of whom were unaware that they were infected thereby posing a danger to vulnerable groups. We're spotlighting the H demographics today in our county because we are seeing a similar distribution.
If we zero to seven, We're seeing an 8%. The 18 to 29 age group, we're seeing a 27%. In the 30 to 49 age group, we're seeing a 39%. In the 50 to 69 age group, we're seeing a 20%, and in the 70 plus, we are seeing a 5%. That's about a 66% of our cases, and that is reflective of what we're seeing in California as well.
Thank you. Mister chair supervisor Williams to because it this is relevant to one of the items you're going to cover today. Can we start tracking a little bit at least internally or separately. The split in that in the 0 to 17 folks or have you already done that are anecdotally I'm going to start by saying that. Older kids don't have as high maybe as we do, but still have higher transmission rates. So can we segment that data
somewhat? We do have that data, but I'm not sure about sharing it. We're following basically this is consistent with state and national and world age group categorizations.
So can you just say generally, the data split that you've seen agrees with the scientific conclusion that zero to 10 year olds have very low transmission rates. Is that true or not?
And I can bring that data back once we parse it out with the team.
Thank you.
1:07 – 1:153 turns
I'd like to, because of what I just shared about the age distribution of our cases. I'd like to share with you a focus outreach effort by our JIC team.
Did you know more young people between the ages of 18 and 40 are spreading and contracting COVID-19? In fact, statistics show that positive cases of the coronavirus are growing rapidly in young people. We need to defeat the spread of the virus so we can get back to doing the things we enjoy. Each of us can play a role and stop the spread of the virus with one simple task.
Wear a mask! Stay strong, Santa Barbara County. Protect. Respect. Wear your mask.
Great, so just as a few months ago when I was before your board and we were worried about the ever increasing rates in Santa Maria. And we engage with partners and very focused outreach efforts. And I believe that's why what we're seeing a decreasing transmission in our northern regions. I want to say that because of our focus outreach now gearing towards younger populations, younger community members, we hope to see the results in several weeks reflected just like the downward trends that we saw in Santa Maria, Lompoc. We're hoping to see that in this age group as well.
And next I'd like to talk about the monitoring metrics for our county. As you recall, these are the six metrics that every county is held accountable with regards to the state's decisions on reopening and allowance of sectors reopening. So the six metrics includes the average number of tests per day per 100,000 population, case rates per 100,000, testing positivity Change in three day average of COVID positive hospitalized patients, ICU beds available and the percent of currently available ventilators. So there is a threshold for each of these metrics. Santa Barbara County status as of yesterday we had 213 tests.
Which is good, because the state would worry if we fell beneath the 150 tests per 100,000. With regards to case rate, the state published us as having 159 case rates per 100,000 this is in red because it is concerning The state is worried when counties exceed the 25 per 100,000. On testing positivity we are right at 8% and the threshold for that is anything higher than 8%, the state would worry.
On increasing hospitalization The state would worry if the percent change in three day average of COVID positive patients hospitalized as greater than 10% which signifies an increasing hospitalization. We are very, we're As I showed earlier, ours is negative 6%, so it reflects the downward trend in hospitalization. With regards to limited hospital capacity we have roughly 39% of ICU beds currently available.
The state would worry when that number falls beneath 20%. With regards to percent ventilators currently available, we have 78% noted in our county which is in green. The state would worry if that number fell beneath 25%. So as you are aware several weeks ago the state shared that they were backlogged in the CalReady system, thereby counties were not able to access information that describes their testing positivity or their case rate. Yesterday late afternoon, the state released our retroactive data set and this graph shows the testing positivity rate from July 25th to August 17th.
I'm sorry, for the testing positivity it is to August 5th and we started on early late part of July at 9.1 and now we are at roughly around eight The retroactive data for case rate per 100,000 is from July 25th through August 17. And here we see we started out at 323.4 and yesterday was 158.9. And this has significant impact on policy decisions in our county and what can be reopened I want to pause and really acknowledge my epi team and working really around the clock to make sure that we have the data. to verify with the state.
As you are aware, the state changes methodologies which causes a difference in the numbers that we publish and even though there were sites published by the state, we weren't comfortable until we could verify it so Dr. Ansork and I have been working since Friday over the weekend with our epi team and the state saying you know show us your number, show us how you're arriving at your numbers so that we can verify because we don't want to We're happy to share this with you today.
The impact of our capability, our ability to offer school waivers. And I'd like to invite Dr. Ansor to talk about the process.
1:15 – 1:215 turns
Thank you, Director DeRueno. Thank you, Chair and members of the board. What Doctor Doreen also just shared our significant decrease in the transmission rate in the county makes us eligible to allow for waivers for elementary schools. We are very pleased to announce that this process will be available It is a process that has been put in place by CDPH. Counties still on the monitoring list like Santa Barbara County, however where the transmission rate has fallen below this magic number of 200-300,000 citizens over 14 days can We are currently finalizing our local waiver application form and it will be available later this week on our website.
All the necessary requirements to complete a waiver are available on CDPH's website already, and we are setting up an extra email account for schools to submit their waiver application forms and necessary documentation. Documentation is very important because the state outlines that it's required for the superintendent or equivalent in private schools or charter schools to have communication or consultation with parents with teachers or teacher's unions as well as community organizations that are involved in school operations to have consulted and show evidence of that, as well as a need for the school that wants to open to publicize their reopening plans, which is essentially a very detailed plan that any school that wants to open for in-person instruction needs to have.
Which details cleaning, disinfection, making sure there are small and stable cohorts or classes Entrance and egress and movement within the school, health screenings for students and staff on a daily basis. Face coverings for children third grade and up mandatory below that is recommended. Generally hygiene practices, identification and tracing of contacts that the school is able to do that. That they encourage physical distancing, encourage staff training and family education And also make sure they have processes in place that testing of students and staff could be readily available on short notice, as well as triggers for switching to in-distance learning again and communication plans. So, this will be announced by our school liaison today after this board meeting and the form will be available on our website as well.
Let me finish by saying that once the application is vetted and reviewed by us, we will then consult with CDPH if they have any misgivings or further requirements. And then the application can be granted, please allow for two weeks between planned opening date and complete application of the waiver. Yeah, so. Let me refer back to director Dorian also will be available for questions later. Thanks Supervisor Hartman did
have a question now.
What happens if our rate goes up again? The dimmer switch would you talk more about that?
It's it's been determined by the governor that we would not rescind the waiver if the rate were to go That would not be fair to parents or children. We obviously would monitor the schools more closely, we might require more frequent testing and we would act on the individual school's profile.
Supervisor Williams? So you bring up one of the challenges for these school districts is access to testing. So now that we have some of our own testing resources, can we segment a portion of those to give sort of room for schools to be doing testing? Because right now if you're not meeting state guidelines Good luck getting a test, right? And so that's one of the challenges.
1:21 – 1:318 turns
So we have availability at our OptumServe testing sites. While we were encouraging community members to seek testing if they are symptomatic, we are noting that there is availability and people are getting tested regardless. In addition to that the county is going to be, or has been opening three additional sites sponsored by the Public Health Department. And we are fine tuning before we launch it fully and so that those three sites are additional sites. In addition to that, we're also thinking and talking With our neighboring counties like Ventura about the funds that they're using, the testing platforms that they're using to be able to produce large quantity of testing with a rapid turnaround.
I guess what I'm asking is within those three testing sites that we are unveiling, that as our own resource if we could prioritize at least among the employee preventative testing, the testing that these school districts will need to get their waiver applications approved.
So our county-sponsored testing sites are for essential workers. And so it's really difficult when we parse out the schedule or the blocks for it, but it is available for all essential workers.
May I add? So Supervisor Williams through the chair, I think we'll take that back to the Joint Decision Authority It's a balancing act and making sure there is enough tests for essential workers, but I'm assuming teachers will be essential workers or are essential workers. So we'll look to see what we can or can't do, what capacity in consultation with the school district or the superintendent.
As doctor as doctor answer shared the state has restrictions on what can be reopened just like the elementary school waivers. It's all based on data essentially based on our case rates in this county and I want to note that Because decisions at the state, because of the restrictions by the state on what we can reopen. That is really critical for us to have good data and state websites, the CDPH County Monitoring Data Table as well as the CDPH Snapshot Tool which is available to the Public Health Department For the monitoring of our disease transmission and the governor's COVID-19.ca.gov, there are occasions multiple occasions where the published data will differ and I want to note that they will differ always because of the methodology of the teams as well as a lag time in which the information the data is inputted so we again yesterday We spoke loud and clear.
And the state verbally on that call made a commitment to reconcile the data in between the teams, as well as seizing the opportunity to work with the governor's office on reconciling the data on the COVID-19.California.gov. Our goal is Always to decrease the spread of this disease in our county. And the concrete evidence of that is going to be when we get removed from the county monitoring list. Yesterday I heard that Santa Cruz fell off the list and possibly today San Diego will fall off the list. I'm encouraged and I want Santa Barbara County to soon follow. And as we saw the rates in North County decreasing, I think it's very possible.
Additional schools can be reopened for in-person learning if the county is off the monitoring list for 14 days so that's an incentive for us. However additional sectors can only be reopened via a new state health officer order. And so that is just to say that indoor, the current outdoor operations for many sectors cannot be moved indoors until the state offers us a new state health officer order.
So the action needed to achieve this goal of falling off the state monitoring list is simple. Wear face coverings, maintain the six foot physical distancing, avoid gatherings with those outside your household and crowds. I think this is difficult for everyone to adhere to as time goes on, but it's critical and it is necessary. And just a reminder that That to be aware that we don't always know someone's underlying condition. We don't know for certain when other, when we come into contacts with others who they've been with and where they've been with it's widespread in our community. I want all of us to be safe and healthy so my advice to everyone is again to heed the message that we've been saying all these months Wear your face covering, maintain physical distance and avoid gatherings and crowds.
This is a critical time in our response to the pandemic. And as we've seen up in Santa Maria, we can decrease our case rates. Thank you.
Thank you Dr. D'Arneso and Dr. Ansorg. That was a really extraordinary good news presentation. Supervisor Hartman then Supervisor Williams and I'm sure there'll be others.
Thank you. I really appreciate the presentation today and all the work we've had a board break but your office has been working day and night on weekends for months now I am excited to hear about the news in Santa Maria, however what keeps me up at night is the conditions in Isla Vista where we have UCSB City College other institutions that are having remote learning and saying come enjoy the Isla Vista life.
We need an all hands on deck effort in Isla Vista and I don't think we have it yet. And I'm just putting the marker out there because today we heard University of North Carolina Chapel Hill opened, had to close again. And we're going to see that and this may affect our numbers for the county as a whole so we really need to bring focus to Isla Vista. So thank you for considering that.
Supervisor Williams. I do think that part of complementing this good news would be that we can continue the downward trend in transmissions and do the work to do that. And so, you know, wanted to ask you, I mean they, I think it was the WHO or getting it made recommendations on mask design in the last A couple in the last week and a half. And indicated that you know, not all masks are equal and that masks that have a exterior that is more water resistant is more useful. It might not be as comfortable during this heat wave for a lot of folks but Can the department take some steps to promulgate if you agree with those findings, promulgate mass design? There's a lot of mask at home makers in the county.
It's a challenge to legislate and wear a mask at the same time but but because my old masks. And this one, I think you guys can understand me. So that's good. But if there are certain designs, can we promulgate them? Because there is a small little core of folks with their home sewing machines that would want to make them for the community.
1:31 – 1:5025 turns
Supervisor Williams through the chair, thank you for that information. That is something that we can certainly look at and work with our JIC team to outreach to our community as well as all the community groups who've been making the masks to give to others.
Are there other questions at this point?
Yeah,
go ahead. Hello? Supervisor Adam.
Thank you. Well, I just want to offer a different analysis of the Santa Maria numbers. I think that what you have here is demographics advantage in the north. Typically younger people are healthier and we have a lot of younger people up here. The average age is lower. And I think you've probably been looking at and not tracking A very high transmission rate between asymptomatic people.
And we know that there's many, many people that are asymptomatic and I don't know whether we know what the percentage is on that but we don't report it. And I think what you're looking at is you're finally building herd immunity whether you wanted to or not. More people are getting the immunities, the antibodies and it's just harder for the disease to transmit between people. So that's probably why your numbers are falling off.
Supervisor Lavinino here. Was that a
question? Supervisor Adam, did you pose a question? No question. Okay thank
you. I don't want to debate you on it. You know, you have your way of looking at it and some of that's prescribed by the state and I get that but I'm just offering a different point of view.
Okay thank
you. Thank you Supervisor Adams. Supervisor Lavinino
Thank you. I have a question about, I want to kind of go in the vein of salons. It's probably what I'm getting the most questions about. So question about if we, if the governor and he's talked about that the state is turning the corner and when we look at our own numbers we see considerable improvement If the Governor decides to make an announcement, whether it's this week or next or whatever about opening salons. If we are on the state monitoring list would we be able to move forward with a reopening?
I can take a stab at that. So from looking at previous decisions by the state, really the lever is whether you are on the monitoring list and for how long? So it appears that if you are on the monitoring list for the last 14 days, Reopenings and so typically we get a heads up from CDPH. We're on calls with them twice a week, and so we would get an indication of what is about to be open and the measure for which counties can be allowed. But from what I know from yesterday, it was even if we fell off today and we had been off for 14 days then the closed sectors cannot be opened until a new health officer is written.
Dr. Answer, do you have additional insight?
Yeah, the sectors are closed for indoor operations right now. I we understand that that's a significant hardship for many business owners and we are CDPH has hinted towards the plan of coming up shortly with amended or a new health officer order and we're hoping that this will address this issue as well.
In addition to that, that jogged my memory. The state I heard yesterday on the call, the state is revising the monitoring lists and the criteria for the monitoring list as well.
So it is certainly possible in the cards that there will be some change in the landscape in the very near future?
Okay that's encouraging. And I did want to give a shout out to the Santa Barbara County salon owners that there was a statewide movement, they were deciding they were going to open yesterday regardless of what the Governor did and I know many in Santa Barbara County had talked about it, they got together and many of them just decided. I received back one email that talked about we're going to open when we can do it with integrity. We want it to be tomorrow but we want to be mindful of public health so at the same time it's also impossible to explain to owners why they are closed I think they're probably the most trained. I think they have to have 1600 hours of training before they receive a license and you know, I guess I'm probably preaching to the choir here because I've had Dr.
Reneau-So tell me that it doesn't make a lot of sense to her either even in public health atmosphere why they are closed but You know, I also think it's a little strange that we say that you can go ahead and go ahead and do it outside. And Dr. Ansorg and I, I think we've kind of got the hair that you could probably cut outside. I've had mine cut in the garage with the door open but...
You know, I think a man probably wrote that rule because I don't know many women that are going to go get their hair done outdoors. So, I think...I guess what I'm looking for is what's the most effective way to communicate to the Governor's office and the CDPH That it is a priority for us. I'm assuming it is a priority for us, and I'm just curious as to how best to go about to direct my constituents on the best way to advocate on their behalf.
We are committed to sharing that concern and sharing what we know of our local epi data to the state. I believe our calls are on Mondays and Wednesdays, and we will definitely make sure that the state hears our concerns. And I think that I do want to point out that while to be this big, behemoth institution. They have been very responsive to Santa Barbara and to both whenever Dr. Ansar Grai or Paige call and say, We're concerned about the numbers, help us. They've assigned an epi team to work with us to make sure that we know their methodology. We were one of the first counties to receive that extra help. So with that I want to say that we're pretty vocal on these calls and we have to identify ourselves. And I don't say I'm Vaughn from Santa Barbara County anymore and I'll make a comment and they're like, thanks Von.
So we're a known entity and we will surely advocate and make sure that reason is being considered as the state relooks at formulating the new metrics.
Thank you.
You know, I just had a question going back to the transition of the data. My sense of it is that this is all happening very fast, kind of real time. You got information from the state yesterday. They generously have responded to your request for assistance to make the numbers align but I don't think they completely do yet but you're hoping to work through that with the state? Is that a fair characterization?
Yes, so we received the state's codes to run the numbers and their methodology. And our epi team was able to duplicate it. Not exact match-to-match but roughly significantly we can reconcile. So it's a work in progress I think that if We are advocating for good access to their methods. And I think because of the three-pronged approach, myself, Dr. Ansorg, Paige and our epi team, so four prong approach we are in a comfortable position where we can say that our numbers have been vetted and their numbers have been vetted.
And the concerns that you had previously expressed about, that were expressed by other counties about potential glitches in the state system. Those are being resolved and-
Yes so my concern was that Since we fall beneath the threshold for the school waivers to happen. And if we are dependent upon the state's published data, would there be any backtracking? If the state decides that oops, we forgot these number of backlog cases and I heard through the state call that no whatever they publish they will stand by so I'm confident that we can proceed.
And then there's the caveat that the state metrics are going to change, but your assumption and your conversations have been they are more likely to change in a more favorable rational way rather than in going backwards. Correct. All the things that folks are concerned about potential openings of other businesses, the status of the school reopening triggers. Your sense is those will be more readily available than they were previously with the old metrics?
Yes, one of the things that we advocated for in the counties is that it doesn't make sense to have the monitoring metrics be measured on a daily basis. So the state is entertaining the idea of doing it on a seven day period so that's one of Changes that's being considered and I think that through these calls on Mondays and Wednesdays We're able to offer the local experience And I think that as soon as we say something from some Santa Barbara County, we're noticing that other counties chime in and say yeah That's our experience too. So I think that there's a groundswell for rational and measured Monitoring that makes sense. I think that we can agree that we want to reopen, but we wanna reopen in a safe manner.
And those rolling averages help eliminate the problem of a single day spike that would set you back on a two week clock and have you start all over again. That does make a lot more sense, it's more predictable, it's more accurate reflection of community spread. Well, this is all really good news and I think it all comes back to the consistent message to the community. To do simple things that we've been asking all along. We're starting to see compliance people are doing it.
That is another answer to the numbers why they have gone down as the level of compliance has increased. And this is the moment when the risk is people get lax again. It's the last thing we can have right now is people thinking that we have achieved something would result in a pause in our effort and that would put us right back where we were, and we can't have that happen. So this is the moment to pay attention.
Any other questions for Dr. Dobernosu or Dr. Onsorg? Okay, Ms. Anderson.
Good morning Mr. Chairman and members of the board. We'd like to give you an update on our RISE business activity that's happened since the last board meeting. And just to recap, because it has been a bit of time now. Starting in July the state indicated closed indoor operations to multiple sectors and added a few more July 13th. On August 3rd they did revise some school guidelines on the checklist including sports in that information and providing waiver forms available to school districts should they be in compliance.
New sector guidance was issued for youth sports programs and then on August 7th new sector guidance for higher education. Our current public health order is matching these changes and it is 12.6 2020, issued on August 12th So where are we now. Here's a basic visual of where we were in our stage opening. We had actually made it through halfway up Stage 3 however under all the red categories there have been rollbacks to some extent and restrictions applied to various sectors All of our information for businesses is available at our recoverysbc.org website, all in one place. It's been very easy for the businesses to access. Just a reminder to the public that if you are wanting to reopen a business, you can self-certify online. You do have to review the state and local guidance, complete a prevention plan and self-certify that you can open safely.
Since the initial self-certification process and as of August 14th, we've had nearly 3,900 business submittals countywide. 3,500 of those being in the city areas. Our top three industries continue to be dine-in restaurants, retail stores and our office workspaces. We did want to mention a little bit about our RISE ambassador. This was initially started through our community wellness team out at the EOC and because of its popularity has now grown and been moved over to our emergency operations center so acknowledging Kelly Hubbard and her team for making this happen they are looking at this as being the first step in community and business education These folks provide outreach through phone calls, engagement in the public and especially high traffic areas.
Starting soon that this program will expand to one program lead, three team leads and 18 ambassadors out in our unincorporated areas. And the program lead is expected to start August 24th. They are continuing to assist the city programs as well and getting them going so that it's throughout the whole community of Santa Barbara. We did want to remind folks that if you are seeing a violation out in the public, you can go online and identify this on the RecoverySBC.org site. You just simply put in the information and that will be distributed to the appropriate agency who handles compliance for that particular type of business.
And just a reminder as well that the county in the unincorporated areas is allowing for development out into public rights of ways and private properties such as parking lots if it will work for your business. So you can please contact our permitting agencies both in Santa Barbara and Santa Maria, and we can assist you with that. Something over the last couple of weeks We wanted to provide a status on your board on July 14th adopted a budget that included Some allocations to community programs and so we want to let you know where we are at in that process Please denounce it as of yesterday Our coordination was SB Foundations, the Santa Barbara Foundation working with their Better Together program which are matching some funds in order to provide small businesses.
So we're excited to have this launched yesterday. These are up to $7500 grants, 5,000 of that from the county matching with Santa Barbara Foundation funds of about 2,500. These are for smaller businesses with annual gross sales less than $2 million and between 3 and 25 employees. They will have to indicate that there has been a decline in the sales of about 25% due to COVID, and they need to be self-certified through our RISE program. But we're excited to have that out. Those applications are being taken through August 31st. And you would go to find the application on sbfoundation.org. We're likely going to be posting this as well on our website.
Two other programs that your board allocated funding to is for a rental assistance program. This is being handled through our CSD and HCD coordinating with United Way. This is to provide $1,000 per month up to three months and we anticipate this will assist about 600 households throughout the unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara County. The last disaster relief payment program was also approved by your Board the lead department for this is DSS and they are also coordinating with the United Way And this is for a max benefit up to 1,500 per individual and 3,000 for family on This is also for we anticipate it will help about 600 households. And we also anticipate this It'll be available sometime next week or soon thereafter
1:50 – 1:566 turns
You know I know that's what our previous program. But I mean, was there any thought about changing that? Because obviously we have the discretion on this. It's not tied to a funding stream where previously when we did this it's tied to a funding stream that had certain requirements like that and we have very low median income in this county as compared to cost of living. So I just would wonder if there's some thought to changing that to 100% I just want to make sure that we're talking about. Area median income.
And if you can provide me with that. Specific numbers, but I mean. I recall from. My affordable housing at the city A decent amount of need. Of course, the balance there is we're only going to have enough money for 600 households. So I get it. I just wonder if some thought to that or if you don't immediately get 2,000 applications to then open it up to 100% immediate income folks?
Supervisor Williams.
Supervisor Mr.. Chairman this actually concludes it. Here's our resources that are available both on our website and Happy to answer any questions you may have
thank you at the presentation are there any questions of Ms.. Anderson or mr.. Jepson Any comments on this item Well thank you all for working so hard and for all this time to bring us this information and resume these presentations. I think it's very helpful for the public, and I know we have some public comment.
Yes Chair Hart and members of the board, we have three requests to speak on this item. We're going to begin with Andy Caldwell to be followed by Corey Heyman.
Chair Hart members of the board I'm Andy Caldwell representing Colab. I have several comments on this. Hello this is Andy Caldwell representing Colab I have a couple of comments on this subject. First of all, it was disconcerting that the county spent over half the money it got from the state on itself, i.e., its own staff. It's really hard to understand. As far as I know, I can never remember any news reporter hearing That indicated that the county laid off anybody. I don't know if you have 3,500 to 4,000 employees but while there were mass layoffs in the private sector that there were none and so on top of that now they're spending over half the money on your staff. And a fraction of that on some of the businesses and individuals that are really hurting The other thing that I wanted to bring up it was unfortunate.
We thought is that the rise guide which we thought was supposed to be an entirely positive outreach and I called attention to this a few weeks ago as to whether or not they would be quote unquote investigators are not and maybe they're still staying true but the fact that they have now published opportunity to report violations I don't think it's very positive development.
And getting back to Supervisor Hartman's point, we have to ask whether or not your staff will monitor Isla Vista on for instance Friday and Saturday nights? We know that there could be thousands of students that traditionally party in Isla Vista on Friday and Saturday evenings Which is entirely illegal as far as the COVID guidelines are. Will you guys be actively monitoring? If in fact, you've opened up an opportunity for violation complaints will somebody in the county be addressing that because as you well know when those congregate high density living situations that could spread like wildfire NIV and finally unless I missed it I didn't quite understand the answer to Supervisor Lavinino's question.
If we're on the watch list, do we and there is a new health order saying that for instance beauty shops can go back inside? If we're on the watch list does the new order apply to us? Thank you.
1:56 – 2:1515 turns
Thank You Mr. Caldwell
And we will now go to Corey Heyman to be followed by Terry Strickland.
Good morning Chair Hart and members of the Board of Supervisors. Thank you for your continuing leadership. I would like to acknowledge this important first step in getting students back in the classroom reliable data fully support this decision case counts under the current testing protocol keeping counties on the state monitoring list are not an accurate measure of community spread net daily hospitalizations throughout California have been declining since July 1st Despite the incessant media raising alarm over case count and positivity rate.
The county's decision today based on reliable data paves the way for it to continue creating tailored public health policies, to allow our economy and society to safely carry on including to allow middle and high schoolers back on campus while also protecting the vulnerable and at risk population. Thank you.
Chair Hart, members of the board. We reached out to Terri and unfortunately she is unavailable at this time so that was our final speaker.
Thank you for those comments are there any other questions or comments from members of the board? All right can we have a motion for this item to receive in file?
I move. Staff recommendation A through C and our staff report
second motions have been made in seconded any discussion to the motion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll
Mr Adam?
Reluctant by
Mr Lavinino.
Hi
Mr Williams I miss Hartman I chair heart
I
motion passes unanimously
let's take a 10 minute break and then we will come back. Thank you. We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting for August 18th, and we have one public comment item. We were able to connect with Ms. Strickland on the previous items so we're going to go back to have her get an opportunity to make a comment about the COVID-19 item.
2:15 – 2:196 turns
Yes Chair Hart, members of the board thank you. We are going to Ms. Strickland now.
Hi this is Terry Strickland. Can you hear me?
Yes we can. Thank you.
Yes we can hear you
OK thank you. So I read the letter submitted by Brian and Corey that was submitted to the board online and I wholeheartedly support their suggestions in that letter. I wish it would have been read to the public it was a great letter I think some of the news we got today on the covid update was. The news was good, I think it's important that the younger stronger healthier people are contracting the virus as opposed to the older population and I had a couple of questions on the IV residents You're concerned about the increase and we know why there's probably the increase. But are those young people being hospitalized? That was a question I had.
And Supervisor Williams asked the question about the zero to 17 year old data, the data on those kids getting the COVID and Dr. De Reynoso Didn't seem to want to release that data or. Nail and hair salons need to be open. My lady that does my nails has been unemployed for months now, and is a single mom. And if it wasn't for her parents she'd be homeless, she'd be out on the street I think it's imperative that this board urges the governor to change the metrics on this and get you know my male salon is one lady me and one lady in there. They they know how to sanitize everything they know what they're doing.
It's needless if they can't be open so. And I have the other question I had was what What was our actual Santa Barbara County's actual discrepancy in the numbers that the state had made the big error on. I never actually heard a number and the last thing I want to say is I hear this a lot. We are all in this together you know there's thousands of residents in this county who are not receiving a paycheck and hundreds of businesses who are losing a lot of money some of them their business while all of you have not missed the paycheck Please keep that in mind every time you say those words, because we are not all in this together. There is a difference. Thank you.
Thank you Mr. Eklund. We'll next go back to administrative item number 67 which we trailed to be part of the COVID presentation. Madam Clerk could you please read that item into the record?
2:19 – 2:2619 turns
Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board. Administrative item number 67 was a part of our addendum on Friday. It was added to the administrative agenda. This is coming from Community Services. It has considered recommendations regarding agreements with United Way of Santa Barbara County to implement an emergency rental assistance program and disaster assistance program utilizing CARES Act funds.
And is there any questions or comments or motion?
Okay
motion's been made second and seconded is there any public comment on this item?
Chair Hart, members of the board we had no request to speak on this item.
Any discussion from the board? Could the clerk please call the roll
Mr. Adam?
Aye.
Mr. Lavagnino?
Aye
Mr. Williams? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
The next item is department item number two would the clerk please read that item into the record
Chair Hart, members of the board, departmental item number two is from the treasurer tax collector. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding financing for the Laguna County Sanitation District wastewater reclamation plant phase one upgrade and this is in the third and fourth districts and there is a four-fifths vote required on this item.
Thank you I see that Mr. Hagan and Mr. McAulpin are up in Santa Maria who would like to start?
Yes, Mr. Chair good morning and good morning to our board of directors of the Laguna County Sanitation District. Public Works is here to present with our treasurer tax collector Harry Hagan as you heard from the clerk we are asking your board to consider the potential financing for our Laguna County sanitation wastewater plant phase one upgrade a very important project for the Orca community certainly in the Santa Maria Valley itself So I'll give you kind of a little history on the project and how we got here. You can see, we have two photographs on the right hand side of the screen. The top right hand photograph is an aerial photo of the existing plant. The bottom is what the future plant will look like once phase one's complete. And the yellow items that you see there are the new features of the upgrade.
So what exactly is the Phase 1 upgrade? The original plant was built in 1959. Our plant sits on Dutarte Road just west of Orchard off of Black Road, so the project itself will upgrade the plant and replace the outdated obsolete deficient facilities which have really lived their useful life The existing plant today can treat up to 3.7 million gallons of effluent a day, and the phase one upgrade will do the same.
We're going to modernize the plant current technical systems or what have you will provide redundancy. We don't have that in the system today so we'll be able to take portions of the plant down and provide normal routine maintenance. We're going to repurpose portions of the existing facility where possible to be as efficient as possible. We're going to update our lab and our control buildings, and then in 2001 we initiated and completed 2003 components.
that were required at the time to address total dissolved solids. So those portions of the facility will stay in service and whatever we do with phase one will be compatible with a future plant capacity, um, a decade or two out, uh, which will align with the full buildup of the eventual Orca community plan key sites. By way of introduction, that's what this project is.
And your board as the clerk mentioned trailed A44 which is our request to award to the low bidder today as well so that's what you'll be considering here, the construction of the phase one upgrade. So at this point I will turn the presentation over to our treasurer Harry Hagan.
Thank You Mr. McAuliffe and welcome Mr. Hagan
Thank you Board Chair and Scott for the lead-in. So what this, do you want to go to the next slide? So the proposed financing for Laguna County Sanitation District is an essential service revenue COP that will generate approximately $28 million in financing proceeds that in addition to the So the way this breaks down is This is an essential service. It will be a fixed rate, tax-exempt offering with a 20 year maturity.
The method of sale will be a competitive sale. The true interest cost when we did the presentation last week to Standard & Poor's was about 2.5%. Financing charges, that's the cost of issuance. Bond counsel, underwriter, disclosure counsel, things of that nature and the payment amount annually will be about, it actually says 1.76 but it has come down to about 1.72, about $40,000 less per year which is about $800,000 less for the life of the issue so the total payment amount will We are going to review the report.
The schedule right now we are expecting our rating this Friday by noon so we can review the report and we are pricing hopefully the week of September 1 is when we go The investors look at the rating, and the rating of this issue is we have very low existing debt. There's about 1.7 million in the State Revolving Fund with a little less than three years left on that and about 1.8 million on the solar project which has a little less than six years.
It's an essential service, something that the residents need. Marty and Scott have got healthy cash balances Very strong coverage in rate covenants which the investors will look at. And it was clear when we talked to S&P that Scott and his management style, and you've got a phenomenal group of operators and management team and fiscal team at Public Works, and that really came through on the presentation. And so this feels like it's going to be a really strong AA.
It's really fun working with you, Scott. You really nail it and come prepared. Makes it easy.
2:27 – 2:2915 turns
Thank you, Mr. Hagan. Any questions from board members? That was a really thorough presentation and good news about the cost of funds. Is there a motion from the board? Oh excuse me, is there public comment?
Chair Hart, members of the board I did just want to note for the record we had no requests to speak on this item.
Okay well Mr. Chair, this is my district so maybe I'll lead off here with your indulgence. This is just a 60 year old piece of equipment that we've been trying to cobble together with duct tape and bailing wire and bubble gum. And it's really, really time to get this updated. And I think that it's been very well done. We've had a number of different people that when I came That were really thinking that they were getting sandbagged by having to build a new plant and we instituted a bunch of tours that brought people out there to see what the facility actually looks like.
And the fact that we don't have any public comment today is, I think not surprising but Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee. I just want to make a motion as an indicator of what the public thinks the relative value Yes, we
will go and we'll do that in a motion. I think we need to read it into the record So just the motion on this item and then we'll come back for that after we conclude this motion
My second supervisor Adams motion
motions been made and seconded any discussion or comments All right, we'll have a roll call then please
Mr. Adam Hi
Mr. Lavagnino,
aye.
Mr. Williams, aye. Ms. Hartman,
aye.
Chair Hart,
aye
motion passes unanimously
and then Madam Clerk would you please read item number 44 into the record?
2:29 – 2:4316 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board, administrative item number 44 is from Public Works Board of Directors in the Laguna County Sanitation District. It is to consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District wastewater reclamation plant phase one upgrade and fund balance policy, and this is in the third and fourth district.
And-
Will?
Yes thank you Supervisor Adam.
I would go ahead and make a motion to pass the staff recommendations on this item.
Motion's been made, is there a second? Seconded by Supervisor Hartman. Any discussion? Any public comments?
Chair Hart and members of the board we had no request to speak on this item.
Okay, roll call please.
Mr. Adam?
An enthusiastic eye. Aye.
Roll-call vote 1–0 motion to pass the staff recommendations on this item. Motion's been made, is there a second? Seconded by Supervisor Hartman. Any discussion · 1 under review
Show transcript
The next item is department item number three when the clerk please read that item into the record.
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the county executive office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a proposed wine business improvement district
Mr. Bryce, welcome. Does
that work? There we go. Well good morning still. I'm Ed Price, Assistant Auditor-Controller and joining us today by remote participation from the Santa Barbara Vintners Association is Allison Lissette CEO, Katie Rogers Vice President and along with Nicole Farley from the consulting firm Civitas. This item is on the agenda to allow the Vintners Association to introduce their proposed widened business improvement district or a bid, to solicit any direction from your board may want to provide on this proposed BID.
The proposed bid would be the first bid in which the county is the lead government agency, and as noted in the board letter comes with some challenges. One being that there are no existing collection processes in the county that can be leveraged for the proposed assessment. In other bids in the county, the assessment is on hotel occupancy and conveniently piggybacks on the existing TOT collection process.
The proposed assessment for this BID will be based upon sales Unlike TOT, the county government does not have a role in the collection of sales taxes. That is a function of the state. The collection of sales-based assessments will require a new assessment process to be designed and implemented and it is being proposed that a third party be contracted to administer these collections.
The second and more difficult challenge is the current proposed assessment will be on limited sales known as onsite direct-to-consumer sales, or basically sales within the wine tasting rooms. This is a subset of sales that is not specifically identified in any of the reporting that does go to the state on their collections. Therefore, the collection process will not be able to leverage data reported to the state to simplify the assessment reporting and verification. The calculation of the assessment will need to be based upon self-reported data, which of course will require more efforts to verify businesses are fairly pairing their assessments.
Another challenging aspect of using the onsite direct-to-consumer sales is the calculation of the petition for the votes for the weighted voting. As the basis will need to be self-reported, those businesses collecting to respond or reply may provide skewing to the weighting of the votes. Accordingly a defendable methodology for weighting will need to be developed While nutsets and processes may be developed to address the challenges of using the onsite direct-to-consumer sales as the assessment basis, the complexly required associated costs ensure that fair weighting of votes and compliance by assessment payers may not be practical or feasible ultimately.
I would now like to turn it over to the Vintners Association for their share of the presentation as well as their thoughts on the challenges.
Thank you Mr. Price. Welcome Ms. Laszlot and Ms. Rogers.
Thank you, good morning staff and supervisors. I'm Allison Laslett CEO of the Santa Barbara Vintners and thank you for hearing our item today. In watching this meeting I was reminded that we greatly appreciated your COVID efforts. The experience of reopening the wine industry was productive for both the county and the wine industry. We had many many moving parts that we all had to handle and the streamlined communication between various deciding bodies in the Vintner's was crucial I raise this point to thank you again, but also because it will become relevant later in this presentation.
For context, this meeting was presented to me as an educational workshop to understand the Business Improvement District parameters of the wine preserve. Wine bid is a phrase owned by an auction house so we now use the term wine preserve. The purpose of this meeting, I understood was for the board to direct county staff to continue to work with us as we pursue the bid formation process. Since I was also asked that this be a 15 minute presentation, we did not solicit the public comment of the 60% of the district that we calculate is in favor of moving this process forward in an attempt to respect your time but I would like to list some of the supporters They are Obon Clemont, S. Parker, Gainey, Bienesito, Brander, Dierberg, Cressini, Foxen, Honada, Stoltman, Fiddlehead, Jackson Family Wines, LaFond, Marjoram, Melville, Foley, Firestone, Sarloose and more.
I have asked only a few of my board members to speak during public comment so that you may have their perspective. I'm sure we will hear extensive public comment at some point in this process But I can assure you we would not be standing here today if we did not anticipate majority support for this process. Could I have the first slide, please? So this is to share that California wine regions, something we all know are a significant part of our state and a large driver of tourism. That is certainly true for Santa Barbara County. Next slide please.
In 2017, we generated $167 million in direct consumer sales. This is relevant for a few reasons. The wine industry does contribute significantly to Santa Barbara County's economy and we look to continue to contribute and grow that contribution. Majority of sales out of Santa Barbara County wineries have their origin in the tasting room. People buy wine, that's where they sign up for wine clubs And they form a relationship with the winery and continue to purchase after they have visited. So visitation and regional recognition for Santa Barbara County wines is how our particular industry succeeds.
Next slide, please. I included this slide because this is a list of all of the things that I have been asked for since I joined the association two-and-a-half years ago. My phone rings with endless requests. And what I have learned about our region is that the expectations and ambitions of the area outpace the resources that we have available, but to show the vendors what we could have with this bid, I did build out a five-year potential budget to include as many of these things as we could.
For clarity, philanthropy is listed here. They do not get philanthropy. You would not see it in the budget because it's not allowed by bid funding and the legal fund which has caused some concern has been budgeted at $5,000 a year. This is to do things like rewrite our board bylaws potentially establish a way for the association to sell wine and help handle legal issues that arise around events.
Next slide please. So part of what we hear is we're often compared to other wine regions. Oh, well they can have this or they can have that the list before Santa Barbara is the smallest in terms of funding when you compare it to some of its peers and in thinking about that what I have learned is that each region has a cultural difference and the funding difference And some regions have found success in one way, and some have found success in other ways. Santa Barbara County has never particularly found financial success through its wine association.
I think that the culture of Vintners is independent. A Vintner themselves is independent, entrepreneurial. They're tenacious. They have to struggle to succeed often And precisely what makes them succeed in the wine industry is what can hamper them working together. I spent quite a bit of time thinking about this because our goal is to help vendors understand their collective power and also recognize it doesn't take away from their independence.
Another challenge that we have had in this area's geography, we're a large wine region with no central area. We're very spread out and it can be difficult for visitors to navigate or find us, or for the vendors in different areas to again unify themselves. You can see here Napa's funding is the highest. They fund themselves through one of the few trade auctions. Santa Barbara County had a trade auction for awhile it did not become the primary funding source at the association. We began to rebuild a trade auction last year but for reference Napa auction is 20 years old and it does take time to build.
Sonoma is very successful at events They earn a lot of their income from that. They have a large auction, but it is a charitable auction different from a trade auction that can fund an association and Paso who we're compared to most has a very large business membership over 300 businesses support the wine industry again I would say that our geography does not really lend itself to having that kind of support because we don't have a central area Next slide, please.
So this brings us to funding. Funding sufficiency and funding stability. Do you have enough funding? I can say that we do not have enough funding to achieve everything that I've heard would like to be achieved. And how reliable are our funding sources? When I joined, we were essentially 100% news funded. The board of directors had to make a decision When I joined the organization, were they going to stay with the status quo or were they going to seek growth and change? And they decided to seek growth and change.
So the first thing I did when I joined was conduct an extensive strategic planning retreat with the board for two days. We identified various funding streams to meet our goals. Next slide please. I listed them out here, you can see the check marks next to the ones that we have achieved. And the two without check marks were established a wine preserve or grape commission so for our first two years we did tackle the ones that we thought we could move the needle on most effectively and most immediately And then we had to choose between the bid and the grape commission, which I know you have heard about.
And we chose the bid ironically because it was more expedient even though it turns out to be taking some time. The bid is contained within the boundaries of Santa Barbara County and a grape commission would also include slow and ventura counties. We thought that we should organize ourselves before we reached out to our neighbors, to try and organize them along with us.
It's a more local process to form a bid which involves the county while a great commission involves the state. It would provide sustainable funding in a quantity that would make a difference. We estimate based on the crop report that the Great Commission would bring in around $600,000. And so this is definitely something we will pursue But the bid is an opportunity to increase funding at a more meaningful level and pace.
You will hear some opposition to the bid as we move through this process, and that is to be expected. We have a robust group of opponents who are opposed to what they may feel is a tax or who would like us to raise money differently or take issue with the organization itself. We are listening to you and talking to as many of those people as we can reach But a greater percentage believe it is time to explore new and different opportunity, and they come together in a way we have not before. This is why we are coming to you today to ask to pursue a process that we feel collectively could change the success of the wine industry.
I will hand this over to Nicole Farley to discuss the logistics. She is our consultant from Civitas and she will continue the presentation.
2:43 – 2:491 turns
Thank you, Allison. And if we could advance to the next slide. Thank you for allowing us to join remotely today to talk to you guys about wine bid also referred to as wine and ag heritage districts, wine preserves and into the future probably many other names and vocabularies. So a wine preserve that we're looking at exploring today is established under the property and business improvement district law of 1994 Part of the California Streets and Highways Code 36600.
So we are looking to establish a dedicated funding stream through state statute to allow for this type of district. On the next slide, you'll all explain kind of how they work. As Allison mentioned, this is through an assessment process so what we're looking at doing in establishing this wine preserve is asking the county to levy an assessment on the winery businesses located within Santa Barbara County.
That assessment is then collected by the local government or a third-party administrator as determined in partnership with the Vintners Association and Santa Barbara County, and then it is remitted to the Santa Barbara Vintners to be spent according to a management district plan. What these wine and ag heritage districts do, and these wine preserves allow is for a level playing field as it relates to everyone that we define in the management district plan as businesses to be included would be paying the assessment. So there's no free rider program that you find sometimes with membership into an organization Everyone who will be benefiting from the assessment funds and the programs and services will be paying some level of assessment into the district.
These districts by statute require transparency. Once the Santa Barbara Vintners begin receiving assessment fundings through their wine preserve, they will be subject to the California Brown Act and California Public Records Act as it relates to the wine preserve. So there is built-in transparency to the public as to how the district is being administered. There's also reliability in terms of funding. Allison talked about, you know, stability of funding and sustainability of funding. This builds in up to five years of dedicated funding for programs and services to benefit the wineries who are paying the assessment.
On the next slide we'll talk about The dedicated funding and how business improvement districts have evolved. And they really did start in the 1930s with the agriculture industry coming together to co-op marketing programs, to enhance demand for their product. In the 60s downtown businesses and downtown property owners saw what success that agriculture industry was having through their co-ops programs and said if they can co-opt Why can't we co-op? And that's when we saw the beginning of business improvement districts and property based improvement districts come to fruition in the United States.
That same concept of downtown and Main Street and commercial corridor, property and business owners working together on clean and safe and marketing and sales type of promotional activities to drive economic engagement within their boundaries It was noticed by the hotel industry in the late 1980's early 1990's as they look to find a way to collaborate on destination marketing and sales activities. And that's when we saw the rise in the beginning of what are called tourism business improvement districts or tourism improvement districts which you have in South County, Santa Barbara and not managed Kathy Janega-Dykes and the Visit Santa Barbara team.
Now moving forward to present day, is we're seeing that same concept that the hotels pioneered as it relates to destination marketing activities through an assessment on We're seeing that transition into the wine industry as what we're presenting today. We've also seen it be very successful in a few select destinations as it relates to their restaurant industry of collaborating to drive culinary promotion.
With the next slide, what all The California Constitution, it's Prop 26 to require a specific benefit back to the payers that is not provided to those not paying the assessment. And so when we look to establish this wine preserve, the winery businesses are those paying the assessment whether they pass the assessment on to the consumer or not because we'll build in that ability, they are responsible for paying the assessment therefore the funds and the assessments collected We're going to be looking at how the Santa Barbara County wineries need to provide a specific benefit back to the winery. So the program that we're going to discuss in this wine preserve are looking at elevating demand for Santa Barbara County line and elevating demand to visit Santa Barbara County wineries to increase As we move into our proposed district, I would like to introduce Katie Rogers who is Vice President of the Board of Directors of the Santa Barbara Vintners.
And she represents Jackson Family Wines to take you guys through what the proposed Santa Barbara County Wine Preserve looks like.
2:50 – 3:026 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board. I'm sorry to interrupt you Ms. Rogers. I know you wanted me to let you know if we can't hear you and we actually can't hear you but I can see that you are speaking. If we could just have a moment.
How about now?
Success.
Okay, Technology 2020. Thank you for bearing with me. So if we could go to the next slide please. So our proposed Santa Barbara County Wine Preserve, wine bid again interchange names but would apply to all wineries located within the boundaries of Santa Barbara County. Marketing, special projects, community organizations, destination product development programs. All of the services, majority of the services that you've seen that Allison referenced that have been requested but we haven't had the proper funding to do would be part of the benefit of this program. The assessment rate would be 1.5% of gross sales revenue from the tasting room only. So in the two years again of working with this process with the Vintners We have gone through many educational seminars and this was the assessment rate that the Vintners chose.
The estimated annual budget based on the data that we have been given by the county would be between $1 million and $1.2 million, and we are proposing a five-year term. The management which will go into detail later as well would be the Santa Barbara Vintners to create a Management Committee. Next slide please. So the assessment again would be 1.5% of onsite direct-to-consumer DTC sales.
So what does that include? That would include all items such as wine, tasting fees, merchandise, food sold to a customer in the tasting room for an onsite event. It would not include the event tickets assuming that those are purchased not on site. What does the assessment not include? It would not include Wine Club shipments and pickups Event tickets and other private event sales.
Purchases made by phone or Internet, and then any wine sold through the wholesale channel. Next slide please. So again looking at the survey of wineries that we did, we surveyed our wineries to learn more about the teacher MDTC business levels off on again like using SurveyMonkey and other functions to get ready for this assessment structure. For the formal process, that will be conducted by third-party CIVITAS and we will work with the county staff to determine the assessment collection process so whether it be in house versus external options currently our plan is to use external collectors due to resources and then The cost to facilitate the collection of the assessments, that will be built into the wine preserve budget. So there will be no additional costs to the county on that part.
The business's ability to pass through the assessment to the consumer as Nicole mentioned, that will be optional but we are again recommending that it would be passed through to the consumers so that there would not be an additional cost to the visitors and then eliminating the membership dues for businesses in Santa Barbara County Wine Preserve Next slide please.
So what are the services that the Vintners will receive as part of this wine preserve? Promotion, sales marketing and communication. As Allison mentioned we were fortunate enough to win the grant the ag grant this past year through that grant we have marketed our wine region even through COVID and pivoting and we have realized that has worked that has increased sales that has increased awareness of our direct-to-consumer channels for Santa Barbara wineries. That has been through a professional marketing NPR firm, so this bid would allow us, since that was just the one year grant, this would allow us sustainable funding to work with the professional marketing NPR firm to open a visitors and welcome center, to again launch a visitor wine tasting app, navigate our very large wine country And advertising initiatives and campaigns, digital social print to bring new consumers into our tasting rooms.
And then also consumer and trade communication campaign to again build the reputation of Santa Barbara as a line category. Next slide please. Protection so full-time director of advocacy do engage on policy and protection issues Again, as Allison mentioned through COVID between Allison and Phil and the Vintners and the excellent work of the county we were able to safely open our doors in a very uncertain time. That took all of Phil and rightfully so but also on Allison's energy during that time if we had a full-time director of advocacy we could be a better consistent partner to the county on issues you know I've heard in my Five plus years through wine ordinance and other county initiatives. Where was the wine community at XYZ point during this process?
And we were trying to market ourselves individually, we were trying to sell our wines individually and we did not have proper funding or support to be a good partner for the county. So when we started doing this Wine Preservation Program, we decided that that was something that we as a community needed So again, we've listed out some of the issues that have come up especially over Allison's tenure that we could be a better partner in.
Next slide please. And education and events business improvement programs, hospitality and sales training programs. The events that we you know have always been doing that before again COVID-19 that we could prove to actually be profitable and bring You know, people into the region for more than just a day trip could bring them in for two nights and eat in restaurants and stay in hotels and do other activities.
I think one of the biggest things too is if you look at the annual Silicon Valley report of direct consumer, you know Santa Barbara at times can be down on the bottom side of the conversion to sale. So offering that hospitality and sales trip training program in which other regions do offer free of charge service members It's something that will also increase the sales and then therefore the sales tax in this region.
And then wine education events and programs. Next slide please. So again about the management of this preserve, the Santa Barbara Bittners would create a Santa Barbara County Wine Preserve Management Committee The Santa Barbara Wine Preserve Management Committee would be comprised entirely of business owners or their representative to pay the wine preserve assessment. So it'd be any winery within Santa Barbara County that has a tasting room and Santa Barbara County Wine Preserve Management Committee would be responsible again for the management of the assessments, funds and programs.
Next slide please. And for the timeline I'm gonna pass it back to Nicole to review where we've been
Thank you, Katie. So we started Allison first reached out to me and the Civitas team in April prior to April of 2018 and 2018. We officially came under contract to explore the feasibility and the formation of the wine preserve in Santa Barbara County. In June of 2018, we initially sat down with county staff So I'm going to talk a little bit about what we did for this project and what a wine preserve would look like. Throughout August 2018 to March 2019, we worked diligently with County staff to try to get an idea of what total wine sales within the county.
Estimated it so that way we could provide During that time, or following that time in June 2019 we started to work on behalf of the Santa Barbara Vintners to draft a management district plan which would be the governing document of the wine preserve and provided that to the county. We received county comments back in 2019 and at that point we really There was additional engagement with the winery and with the county that we needed to do. So, we took a step back and didn't move the management district plan forward at that time but went out and did extensive and more engagement with the wineries so you can see from September of 2019 to August 2020. The education to the wineries has continued with stakeholders In February of 2020, we did finally get an idea, a truer estimate to how much direct-to-consumers wine sales were taking place in Santa Barbara County which has allowed us to calculate that estimate of 1 million to 1.2 million to be generated from a 1.5% assessment on direct-to consumer sales out of the Wine Tasting Room and so that kind of brings us to today In August of 2020 is working with you at the Board of Supervisors to review what we have come up with over the last few years in terms of the wine preserve proposed programs and services assessment rate.
Boundaries and budget and to get consent to work with the county attorney's office to finalize the management district plan We're hoping to do that by the end of 2020. So that way we can have the district start January 1st of 21. Knowing that's a very aggressive and expedited timeline, but we're really hoping to take away from this your thoughts and opinions and comments and be able to start working with county staff to move this forward into that process.
Next slide. And so with that, we'd like to open it up for discussion. Allison will be available for questions on The Santa Barbara Vintners, Katie's going to be talking about any questions relating to the wineries and what they're thinking as a board member and as a winery representative. And then I will be available to answer any questions on the legal process and framework which we are using to move this project forward.
Thank you Ms. Farley and Ms. Laslett, Ms. Rogers for your presentation. Are there questions from the Board?
3:02 – 3:0911 turns
Supervisor Williams. So at this early stage, I've only heard from a handful of folks on both sides of the debate. But can you review for me? I mean what's kind of it? What is the rate? Is it you know on the sales again? I know you flashed that up but I just wanted to understand that again.
Right now the district is exploring a 1.5% assessment on all direct-to-consumer, over-the-counter sales that take place at the wine tasting rooms and wine tasting facilities within Santa Barbara County. So it would not include any assessment on online phone orders, anything that's taking place outside of the tasting room itself. So we're looking at just over-the counter purchases of levying that 1. 5% assessment.
And is the reason for that, that the activities of the bid have a greater benefit on direct sales or what's leading me through that? And
I'm going to let Katie take you through the thought process. Katie and Allison take you through that thought process.
Yeah, I'm happy to take that one. The thought process was again that by the legal definition of the bid, it has to give benefit and support to those being assessed. And so when we looked at initially, we looked at all wine sales through the state of California and some of the concerns that we heard from fellow Vintners was that your wine club members may be in LA or Northern California that aren't coming as frequently to our region but still want to get their wines shipped are going to be reaping the benefits of that. And so through that, that's when we sent out the poll to see if people would like 1% of all California direct sales or 1.5% of all in-person over-the-counter tasting room sales and through that poll, the 1. 5% was the choice that was selected.
I think there's also the feeling that you can see feel experience taste the benefit when you are in the tasting room So if there's any questions as to what the wine preserve is benefiting, it is an opportunity for whoever is serving that customer to explain how the benefits are supporting our region.
Are there any other questions for the team? Do we have any public comments?
Yes Chair Hart and members of the board, we have six requests to speak on this item. And we will begin with David Deleski to be followed by Stephen James.
Good morning Supervisors and Chairman Hart, thank you for giving me this time to address the Board. I've also submitted a letter and a survey for your review. My name is David Dalaski and my wife and I have a co-maker ranch and vineyard in Los Levos, small winery in Hilton in a tasting room in downtown Los Levos from which we sell most of our 2008 production.
We are living the dream as they say but I don't think there's much that opposes the funding For a multitude of reasons, and my comments in my letter will focus on three. The first issue is lack of majority support. The association says they have it but 75% of vintners in this county are not members of the association and therefore do not support it. Likewise the association does nothing to support them.
That's totally fair. The association has existed by active participation from a small group of dudes paying wineries I have surveyed the proposed businesses of this bid, most of whom have no relation to the association and this survey has received 67% opposition to the bid. I see no reason why the association should continue to waste time pursuing this bid other than it is just a huge boost for their funding of their organization and gives Civitas a new type of bid to sell to other wineries The case for the support is based on promoting a bid as something that, quote, costs Vintners nothing because they claim the pass-through they don't have to pay for it which is not true and that it will fund advocacy which I just heard a comment from Allison that that may change.
And also that it might include the wine club in county sales which I'm hearing from Mr. Price that that may get changed as well. Everyone who supported the bid was sold as that, basically. And so again I go into the other issues of funding for political activity. It sounds like you're looking at it already but just last week the Vintners promoted the bid by saying 25% of the funds $1.2 million are proposed. I thought I heard Alex say 5,000. So, you know, the Vintoners don't understand this they're just being sold a bill of goods basically that sounds good to them And you know, the Association is trying to get support for it. The third issue is what Mr. Price came up with in his report. Exactly. The new structure for assessment will not accurately create a weighted vote for the petition.
The previous structure was tied to sales tax but now it's going to be based on all the wineries self-reporting and the wineries that are against are not going to give up their data so easily. The hotel bids are all a simple flat fee. They're tied to the TOT and they're easy to compute and collect. So in my remaining time, I just want to say that my wife and I are very dedicated. Obviously, I'm calling you right now. We're dedicated to this and successful in what we do because we passionately convey our own story. We make good organic wine and engage with our customers personally And we are not free riders, we are the reason people come to Santa Barbara wine country. Many diverse Vintners like us make up a fabric of this wine country and the Vintner's Association wants to appropriate our own marketing dollars and make it theirs without giving us a choice.
The needs of Vintners from the associations here is very different from ours in wineries like us that list of needs I don't really need a welcome center you know our customers have the internet This communication. Thank you, David. That
is your time.
OK, thank you. Thank you so much.
Thank you Mr Jelasky.
3:09 – 3:175 turns
And we will now go to Stephen James to be followed by Tyler Thomas.
Alrighty, go ahead Stephen.
Okay. Dear Board of Supervisors I am on my 24th harvest here in Santa Barbara Wine Country and have long observed how the wine industry here has had several years of success mixed with unfortunately many more years of never quite achieving its glory within California's top wine destinations. I attribute its lack of success to ineffective task leadership at the top of the Santa Barbara Vintners Geography creates distance and fragmentation.
And the fact that we are the most regulated wine region in California poses its own challenges. These conditions create very independent and selfish mindsets just to survive, let alone try to be successful. This is all further exacerbated by Santa Barbara's laid-back lifestyle and free spirit which has rarely created a fully professional wine industry. Collaboration around common goals and group thinking for the common good are difficult Add in a carefree lifestyle and great business habits do not persist.
Times have dramatically changed the last 10 to 15 years here though, not only is global wine competition greater than ever but also importantly new investments and producers in the region have brought new ideas and better business practices and now's the time for Santa Barbara Wine Country to grow up and professionalize itself Starting in December of 2017 with the hiring of Allison Laslett as CEO, the Santa Barbara Vintners have completely started 180 degree turnaround. With a very committed and dedicated board made up of people with decades of industry experience from all sizes and regions we are trying to change the dynamic in Santa Barbara wine country to better serve the wine industry our neighbors and our communities.
In order to create this change we need funding for the last 40 years they've almost been entirely member funded by dues So the cycle of success of the organization has always depended on the success of its policies. Good execution and smart decisions increases membership, bad execution and mismanagement eliminates membership. We are fundamentally trying to break that cycle with the Santa Barbara Wine Preserve so that we as an industry can have consistent sustainable and reliable funding that is not carried on the shoulders of its members.
It's representative of the entire region in a new organization and it's reflective of everyone who has a tasting room in Santa Barbara County. A building an efficient, well-run and accountable organization where execution and best business practices are employed. Santa Barbara Wine Country can finally unleash its potential, remove the chains holding it back and create an industry that allows everyone to thrive, become better partners across other industries, create a network that supports legacy in sustainable agriculture for the future, and will have lasting ripple effects on hotels, restaurants, retail, and other industries that depend on the wine industry's success.
My fear is if the wine industry does not happen And I think Santa Barbara will continue to languish for another 20 years, becoming only a second-rate wine region and never fully reaching its potential. Thank you so much for your consideration and we look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Thank you board. This is Tyler Thomas president and winemaker at Dearborn in Starling and I had a different preamble and then listening to David's comments who I respect his thoughtfulness and his passion for his wine. I just wanted to point out that the survey where he mentioned 67 percent surprising rounded up to 68 percent because it was 67.7. That was a survey of only 62 responses Out of the 300 wineries that he claims and probably by the less than that are in in the county.
So it's again you know not probably as representative of the survey that the vendors did themselves and I think if we if we pulled them all together, I think we would still see the majority support for the bid. I came down 7 years ago from the Napa Sonoma area And frankly, I was in Sonoma when they overhauled their vendors organization and the process was slow. It didn't always have 100% support but they recognized they were missing an opportunity that Napa County was seizing and they wanted to play in that sphere.
When I joined this community quite frankly I was appalled at how underfunded and fractured the organization was The wine community asked for the right things, improved marketing to better compete with Paso. Improved relationships with the government strategies that tap into luxury wine consumers who seem to bypass the area but unfortunately while demanding the right things there seemed to be a sense that these things could be achieved on a shoestring.
When I was in Napa County in 2004, the minimum dues for the smallest winery were $10,000 back in 2004. Our average dues are about a little bit under $2,500. So by drawing on a broader set of the industry, I think we can really increase the power as they showed in the slides with which we can compete. And for the record, average transaction costs in the county here are probably about $100. This would be $1.50 passed through to the customer. Now if we're not attracting as a group a customer type that can absorb $1 50 when they're having an amazing experience at our wineries and our average bottle prices are about 39-40 dollars then I say that means all the more we need the wine preserve to improve the customer type for long term sustainability.
And then finally, if I have a little time left as a member of the AAC and someone you've seen several times regarding trying to work with the cannabis industry, I just want to address some of the opposition that these funds would be used for government relations. Um, I assume that all of us wish the wine industry was more persistently engaged with the winery ordinance revisions, the cannabis ordinance short-term rentals, just to name a few.
The fact that we're trying to run vineyards and wineries it takes a lot of time and energy and we have a board of people that all have more than full-time jobs. We have an underfunded organization whose staff is just treading water, which doesn't allow us to properly engage and listen and lead discussion with county governance in a way that is as productive as it could be so in my opinion funding the staff position they can focus on County relations is actually really important to our industry's long-term success, which we hope means good partnership with the county in promoting the county schools.
Thank you very much.
Thank you Mr. Thomas.
3:17 – 3:2511 turns
We will now go to Karen Steinwalks to be followed by Steve Pepe.
Good morning.
Please go ahead.
Good morning Board of Supervisors, Chairman Hart. This is Karen Steinwalt speaking to you from Buttonworth Farm Winery and lovely Solvang. And first of all I'd like to wish you a very happy International Pinot Noir Day which is today and even more importantly as a member of your Women's Commission cheers to 100 years of the women's right At Buttonwood Farm, we do support the formation of the wine preserve.
And even more importantly, we feel it's really necessary now as we've been dealing with COVID-19 and the lack of our sales through our restaurant on premise channels which has basically gone away and who knows when that will come back to where it was. And also just because we've been able to host people at the winery outside And spend more time with them on a one-to-one basis. We really feel that the experiential part of wine tasting in Santa Barbara County is something that we have an amazing advantage over many other wine regions in the world, and what we'd like to do is be able to continue to explore that and enhance it.
But
revenues are very limited right now. We're basically being supported by online sales as direct consumer for About one-third capacity of the tasting room sales that we used to have in our tasting room garden. And, to be honest, you know, we just don't have the funds or won't have the funds to be able to do this by ourselves. Indeed, we may not even be able to afford to continue our membership through the Vintners Association. We are looking at every penny making $1 and we're cutting back on purchases like barrels And we're really having to be very fiscally conservative in our spending. And unfortunately, marketing funds are one of the easiest things to unfortunately have to let go.
So that's where we are right now. I agree with everyone that we are a group of small winery members. We are hard to wrangle. We are all alpha type and it's hard to make everyone understand that, you know, the old cliche arising I don't really see another alternative. It would be great if we all won the lottery and didn't have to go down this path, but I don't really see anything else that we can possibly do. Speaking with our colleagues in the hotel industry after they went through the TBID process, they of course initially had some reservations about that, but it doesn't seem like most people will even balk at What's probably going to come down to about $1.50 on their purchase, and if you look at some of the regions that I know that some of our areas in the county have a higher sales tax but right now, you know, at our 7 ¾% tax in Salt Lake, we're hosting people that are paying 9% down in the LA region so that little assessment itself is just going to still make them right side up as far as their total purchases as they come to visit us.
So that's really all I have to say to you today. I hope you are all staying cool and we invite you to come on and have a cold glass of wine. Cheers!
Thank You Ms. Dimus
We will now go to Steve Pepe to be followed by Nicholas Miller
All righty, Steve. Go ahead.
Good afternoon Chair Hart and Supervisors I'm Steve Pepe the co-owner of Colt Pepe Vineyards we have lived in our vineyard in Santa Rita Hills since 1994. We're on highway 246 10 miles west of the 101. We were the sixth vineyard planted in the Santa Rita Hills. We were founding members of the Santa Rita Hills Wine Alliance and one of several who created the Santa Rita Hills ABA We have served on the boards of the Santa Rita Hills Wine Alliance and the Santa Barbara Vintners Association. We are opposed, as are quite a number of other people to the proposed wine bid. Some of the wineries that are imposed include many of our pioneers like Andrew Murray, Brian Babcock, Steve Beckman who sent you a letter, Dave Carhartt, Chris Curran, Frank Ostini in The Hitching Post, Rusak Wine, Storm Spear, Flying Goat, Liquid Farm, Rick Longoria one of the pioneers in the county who also sent you a letter and Brian Loring.
Now is just the wrong time to be talking about implementing a charge to the few people that are showing up in our tasting room because of COVID. We oughta wait till COVID is over and things get more or less back to normal. You've heard several times, there's real questions about the Vintners Association. They are a minority of the county wineries. The numbers I've seen for the Vintners are anywhere from 78 to 110 members and there are 270 to 300 bonded wineries.
One of the proposals is that they're going to exclude, exclude wholesale sales so contrary to what you were being told, there will be free riders. Wholesale sales are sales that go hotels, restaurants and grocery stores. And Ms. Rogers in her presentation on slide two pointed out that they would make presentations to quote the trade, close quote. That's the wholesale trade. There are some of the wineries who support this whose income is 40-80% from wholesale so of course they're in favor of it. They'd like somebody else to pay for their marketing so would I.
Also, wine club sales are excluded. They're also free riders. There are some wineries that don't have a tasting room who sell all their wine off of a list, allocation list or through their wine club and they would not be paying their fair share. And in the few seconds I've left, I'd like to point out that the auditor controller has noted That the fair weighing of votes and the compliance by assessment payers may not be practical or feasible. Accordingly, a change in the proposed bias is likely necessary. I would suggest that what you ought to do today is send this back to the auditor controller and let's get agreement on how it's going to be done so we don't have something that is practical and feasible, not something where we're going to have to make a change.
Thank you for your consideration.
Thank you, Mr. Pepe.
3:25 – 3:3214 turns
We will now go to Nicholas Miller who is our final speaker
Go ahead.
Good morning everybody. Thank you Board of Supervisors for taking the time to listen to us today, listen to what we have to offer. All right, well good afternoon again. This is Nicholas Miller. Thank you Board of Supervisors for entertaining this call this morning and listening to our perspective on this upcoming decision that you're going to make. I'm a fifth generation farmer here in the Central Coast and our family has been growing wine grapes in Santa Barbara County since the early 1970's.
We personally have invested a lot of our families' resources in building the local wine industry through our own efforts in marketing, our own connections And building an incubator up in Santa Maria with the Central Coast Wine Services. And while this industry has grown very impressively, we as a family also grow grapes from Paso Robles immediately to our north and over the last few decades have seen that region start far equipped for what we've been able to accomplish here in Santa Barbara County. And the main driver of that is then we have not had the funding through our community that Paso Robles did to push forward as an industry and not just individual efforts They are family operate two different teaching rooms. So full of knowledge that we will get tagged twice by this but we do not see it as a negative which is extremely positive for the area.
We operate one of our kitchens in downtown Santa Barbara near the water and the train station and the other up in Los Olivos with these direct connections to our customers. We are able to take a glimpse of what this county can truly be in Santa Barbara We are constantly hosting customers who happen to find us. They come across us, they get off the train there in downtown, coming from out of town, wandering around and stumble upon our tasting room.
And they tell us and our team about all the other regions they've been to at The Wine World and where they've gone back to but they never knew about Santa Barbara and what it has to offer. And the only reason they haven't been Santa Barbara ambassadors is perhaps because they didn't know who we were. You know that in a Barbara message is not out there as we've lacked the time to put it out there.
That's what I mentioned a couple times here this morning. I really want to focus on how I think they should be viewed and that 2020 the world was broken. The covid effective crushed so many businesses worldwide statewide certainly recently here in Santa Barbara. But this effort should not be seen It should be part of the rebranding of
Santa
Barbara County. It should be part of the effort to rebuild. This marketing was directed at bringing people in a positive light to show them Santa Barbara County. When our customers come, they come not just to come to our kitchens and buy our wine saying there's no reopened hotels to support our on-premise restaurants and desperate needs of new patrons. They come to invest in our county I want to very heavily reiterate that we fully support this and that we've heard there's not the opposite. But ultimately it doesn't need to be decided here. There will be a vote.
Residents here in San Barbara County from a multi-generational farming family that is fully embodied in two different zones. We fully support this effort moving forward, thank you.
Thank you Mr. Miller and that concludes public comment. Are there questions or comments from members of the board? Are there any comments from the Vintners Association presenters? Mr. Migazzone has a comment.
Chair, just before the Board considers this item I would just like to discuss briefly the Board's full discretion to move forward on this. The triggering event as was discussed in the presentation was a petition that would come in and the Board would have full discretion to move forward or not move forward at that point. And I would just look down the road and caution that once established or if established, disestablishment is a function of some wrongdoing. Either violation of law, misappropriation, malfeasance, or at the request of the businesses paying 50% of the assessed levies. So full discretion at the front end and much less discretion once established.
Thank you Mr. Gazzani.
Supervisor Williams?
But I just heard some public comment relating to us proving this and that is not before us on the agenda. This is informational. My understanding is our approval happens when the petition that you just referenced takes place, correct?
Thank you. Chair and that's Chris this is an informational briefing and then if the majority of the owners move forward with a petition, that's what would trigger board action later.
And just from for my part I would like to understand more about. The fair fairness of the assessment mechanism And how that compares to the other bids. So I would like I just want to say thank you to the board of Supervisors for their efforts to protect the. You know the rights of both the majority and the minority. And understand, you know if this is a fair thing obviously we have all state in it which is that Praise both the proponents and opponents for their work to make Santa Barbara wines a success, which has had some benefit for our community.
Supervisor Hartman?
A question and then I have some comments. I think this is the first wine bid in the state. Is that correct Allison?
3:32 – 3:4610 turns
It is correct, there are other wine regions that are attempting to form wine bids. Nicole can speak more to that process.
That is correct we do have other wine regions within California that are actively exploring and under contract to establish a wine preserver or wine business improvement district so in a sense it's
And are they looking at the same structure for direct-to-consumer wine tasting room sales? I mean, I know over the course of since 1918 you've looked at different ways of levying the tax. Could you elaborate why you've chosen this and how it compares with other bids that you're exploring?
I can talk to what the other districts are doing and all of the other districts actively exploring a wine bid have a different assessment methodology. No one is same, each are unique to the businesses within their region. And I can let Allison talk to why they've chosen this methodology.
So we began in 2018 with an assessment model that was 2% of all California sales. We received information from the county about our direct to consumer sales and we were able to reduce the 2% to 1%. We had originally chosen that methodology because it does true up to sales tax, it is a very easy model to track over the period of time that we worked with the vendors, That including the wine club for the reasons you heard earlier that we people come to the area, they form the relationship and then they leave. But if somebody who lived in San Francisco joined a wine club, they would be getting shipment and it would still have the 1% assessment on it. At that point, we decided we took a poll of the vendors had created the 1.5% on tasting room sales and the vendors chose between those two assessment methodologies, 1% of California sales versus 1.
5% of tasting room sales. I think what Nicole is referencing with each region having a different bid structure that speaks to the cultural differences of each of the regions how they earn their revenue, and for us it is highly DTC sales.
Well if I may continue first of all I'd like to thank Ed Price in the CEO's office this is new territory it's taken a lot of effort and I know that Allison Laslett and the Vintners Board of Directors has worked really hard on this I know I and other board members have attended many wine conferences held by the wine industry in Santa Barbara County. And often we hear a lament that the Santa Barbara County region isn't doing as well as other regions, and the question is why?
And there are various interpretations, explanations for that one is often the county itself. My view tends to be that we don't have collective marketing here in Santa Barbara County. We have tremendous diversity of wines and winemakers, and that's a blessing and a curse because it's very difficult for people to really fully appreciate What our wines are. The effort to move forward with this bid is a way to market Santa Barbara as a region beyond, I think the six different AVAs that we have. It's very difficult in New York or Europe to know what an AVA is and I think what I am speaking to Allison about the grant that they have to market to Los Angeles region What they've learned is that even that close, people don't fully appreciate what it is that Santa Barbara wines have to offer.
So I've heard this even from hotel people and people in the visitor-serving businesses. What does Santa Barbara in general have to offer? Well, it's so diverse. We have cultural, natural all kinds of different things to do here and it's hard to capture it in a single slogan or a single branding effort So I really think though that the wine industry is kind of our iconic industry. And it holds up something about Santa Barbara County that, I think all of us can identify with a certain connection to the land and the diversity in the climate and that's what the wine represents. So I am really supportive of finding a mechanism to collectively market the wine, and I think it has tremendous spillover benefits to other visitors serving businesses and to employment.
A lot of young people can find employment in the wine industry, and So I know that they've looked at different methods and I'm still not entirely comfortable with the 1.5 on tasting room only because it does raise these issues of how we How we verify it and I think, I'm hoping over time to hear more about that. The other issue and I think that Mr. Dulaski's letter raised it extremely well is the use of funds for advocacy.
And many organizations have government relations but somehow there's criteria where There's a line between that and advocacy. I just want to say, I want to give a call out to Allison because in my area we've had some complaints about cannons scaring away the birds in the vineyards and I can call Allison and she'll try to figure out who it is and I really appreciate that good neighbor Thank you very much.
Direct policy advocacy, I don't know where to draw that line. But I think that is an issue and it is something that Is important from our perspective in the county as well as I think from the members Of the vendors association and those who are paying the bid so I'd like to hear more on that as well but overall I'm supportive of moving this forward to the next step Are
there other comments or questions from other board members?
Yeah, this thing is not as obvious as it was to me when we first started this because of the heavier requirement to terminate it in the event that its It's not a success and I kind of feel like if, I'm very closely aligned with Supervisor Hartman's statements. You know, I see some valid concerns on self-reporting and I'm not convinced that we need a welcome center either but maybe that's part of the vision for how to Thank you Why or if they considered doing a much lower rate and taxing more, like all of the sales that come out of a tasting room.
And that way there's no issue it's really clean and easy to collect. When it's self-reported and I suppose that's the mechanism for refusing to participate, I guess is just making it difficult to collect. But you know it may do a lot of good and in five years, five years is a legitimate period. And if you ran it for five years and the industry saw benefit then they would be more likely to cooperate and self-report.
And then at the end of the five years there won't be any pressure So I'm open at this point to listening to both sides. Thus far, I have not been contacted. I had a nice meeting with Allison and Katie and I get the benefits that could exist. And I'm open to listening to the other side, I haven't heard it from anybody before today that's opposing it. So I guess we're gonna see it again in the future and maybe we'll make a decision then.
And then,
Mr. Chair? Yes, Supervisor Ioannoni. Okay.
Thank you. So nobody likes paying taxes. The only thing you don't like more than paying taxes is when you feel like your money's not being well spent. So I understand where people that feel like they're going to be charged for something and then they don't really agree with the way the money's going to be spent but The idea to me that 1%, really, or one and a half percent isn't going to make or break an industry. I think what this has kind of showed us is that we all kind of looked at the wine industry as this group of individuals that are out there all holding hands and moving in the same direction. And what this has showed us is like Supervisor Adams said with farmers if you get 10 in a room you've got 11 different opinions so You know, there are going to be winners.
There are going to be losers and I've heard from both sides. I'm kind of fractured on it myself in that I want to see the wine industry become stronger more united and bring more visitors here but You know, nothing's easy. And so is there a perfect way to do this? Probably not. And so we either do this with some warts on it or we don't do it and I'd more like to see something try to happen.
There's a couple real problems I have. One is I think what's been touched on by other supervisors. It's the political advocacy. That's not a good idea. Like Supervisor Hartman said, yes we need a point of contact that can help our offices when we run into issues with the industry. But I don't want to see people getting involved in using these monies that are supposed to be for business improvement to be used as campaign Literature and those types of things, I think that's going to step outside. If you thought you had a fractured group before it's going to be multiply fractured so The really the devils in the details, I also agree with Supervisor Adam that I think a five year window to see whether this thing really can play itself out and people can get behind it is key.
I also think it's somewhat amusing that we're talking about how to collect the tax and how untraceable if we had a track and trace system maybe we'd be able to use it. We could sell it to the wine industry, you know? So I think multiple industries are struggling with that same concept. And I really think Supervisor Adam had a point there that maybe if we, if you talked about lowering the percentage. I'm sure people have thought about that but lowering the percentage and spreading it out over more. Thank you.
3:46 – 3:526 turns
And I'd just like to add that I have a lot of experience as a former council member with the Tourism Business Improvement District and heard a lot of the similar concerns at the formation of that entity, that have all worked themselves out and it seems to be functioning really well. Collectively, the hotel industry. So I think there's great promise for this idea and I share some of the concerns that my colleagues have raised about the practical issues regarding collecting the tax and the advocacy issues. And I'm sure that folks will put their heads together and work that out. And with that in mind, Ms. Laza, would you like to have the last word today?
I just, the advocacy issue was raised and I wanted to clarify. Santa Barbara Vendors is not a political organization. Advocacy by my definition and I'm happy to come up with one that works for the county is different from lobbying. So when I have worked in organizations, the definition of advocacy is to educate and inform And we view that as a crucial part of the work because of how the county and the vendors are intertwined. So, the COVID reference earlier was an example of it. We did take the information that we had from the county and we distributed it to all wineries not just members. So when there are issues that we very much want to make sure that the entire wine industry knows about, we do send that out.
That's what I consider advocacy Our presence in those meetings, being able to speak to the wine industry needs or the beverage industry as a whole. That is our definition of advocacy. If we should... We need to address the winery ordinance at some point I think it would be smart if we were proactive about that. I view that as advocacy. So I'm happy to define That kind of work, any way that we want. But I can assure you that none of this funding would wind up on political campaigns. It's not something that we're allowed to do as an organization and lobbying and political election activity is not something that we do. So when I say advocacy, that's the kind of relationship that I
need. Thank you Ms. Laszlo. Ms. Miyasato?
Chair Hart and Board Members, before we conclude this item it was a receiving file but I just want to be clear because board members said that the next time this comes back it's not scheduled to come back until after the Vintners have gone through the management plan entering their petition and having their members vote and come back at the final stage. Some of the concerns that you've raised is one that Mr. Price raised, and that was we do not have a mechanism to verify the amount of assessment that would be collected because there's no independent way to do that.
And when Ms. Laszlo talked about the county gave them their number for how much they could receive I think Mr. Price told me that we gave them the gross sales number, and then they went to their members and asked them what's your direct consumer amount as a percentage? So we didn't come up with that number just to be clear. We've heard all the board's comments, obviously we want to have a strong winery industry here etc. Just like all of you said that still is an issue and I just want the board to remember that you are the ones that are basically imposing this assessment because it requires a state, I mean a city or county to do that.
I think from our perspective, we would like to see that worked out before they go further. If it can't be worked out your board still has the discretion to go forward with what's before you if they get through the whole petition process.
Thank you for that additional clarification. Supervisor Williams?
Well then let me articulate a little more delineation is I do think that concerns raised by Mr. Price needs to be addressed in some form. And you know, I mean, I appreciated the explanation on advocacy versus lobbying. But a lot of advocacy is lobbying so maybe a little bit more spelling out of what's within bounds and what is not. I think that is very tricky and just to sum, You know, I want to understand what other prospective bids are thinking about and why the revenue formulation of what's counted and what is not counted is the right one for Santa Barbara County.
3:52 – 3:5825 turns
Mr. Chair? Yes, Supervisor Lavenino Well, so we're kind of at a standstill then. So does Mr. Price have any suggestion of what we could do? I mean is there a system out there that It doesn't sound like there's a way that we can verify what somebody is supposed to be assessed. And we're the ones responsible now for collecting it, so are we responsible just for collecting what they said they owe? Or who's responsible if somebody, if the Vintners Association says, We think this person should have paid more, but what we collected was less. Who's responsible for going out and grabbing that or auditing or responsible for that at all?
Supervisor through the chair, my understanding is it would be the collection function that would be responsible for that. And depending on how the organization wants to operate they may be aggressive at those issues or they may not be which is always a concern when you're talking about something that's a levy whether you want to be very simple about that or not. I would look to county council maybe provide whether and who would be doing the collection activity as to what requirements they might have to have on
Chair and Supervisors. Thank you.
I'm going to go ahead
and just picking that up from Mister Price. So I think that, you know, a disgruntled party would be looking at both the county and the private organization. And that's something could be addressed in the structure of this proposed property and business improvement district. So the more clarity there is at
And that's basically what I was going to say is, is I think that maybe the association needs to tighten this up a little bit and make it something that's clean for the county to administer. Because I don't think anybody at the county wants to buy themselves a whole bunch of problems and appeals and morass of litigation or something for down the road.
Well, it sounds like there's a little bit of work to do to tighten up that issue and maybe some more clarification. And those kind of conversations only strengthen the efforts by making it more transparent and addressing some of the issues that critics have raised. So I think that's probably helpful for the whole effort. Supervisor Lavenino?
Yes Mr. Chair, I'm just kind of curious where do we go from here? So what we heard from our board majority or maybe all of us was that we support this idea but I think a majority is now saying we're not comfortable with or we need to hear more about how this is assessed, collected, what happens When there's a disagreement, and I don't wanna be going out and hiring additional county staff to be having to deal with this levy. So I'm not comfortable moving forward today on it with what I'm hearing right now. And so I'm just trying to figure out what the timeline looks like of how this is gonna go forward.
Supervisor Hartman?
Oh, well I mean a third party would be hired to collect it at least according to the report. Maybe Mr. Price you could talk more about how that might
work? I can try You know, the offices in the county are, as you all know, tapped for resources. So the idea was to use a third-party provider that might be able to do this. I would say just generally speaking with any kind of levy or tax scheme that is developed, more simple, the easier, the better, the cleaner and so forth. And so as you keep adding new layers of complexity, more opportunity for problems could resolve. So I would say if there's going to be any suggestion out there, keeping it simple would
I don't think we're going to resolve this issue here today. It's incumbent on the vendors to hear this input and work that into their deliberations and proposal, and if it takes another time back On to the board after some more work and fine tuning that it's just a necessary part of the process. This is want to get this right? We don't want everyone to feel like their voice has been heard, but you know the goal isn't just a minimal 50% of the assessed valuation. The goal is a consensus in the industry and something people can embrace and really get behind so that's the charge supervisor Williams just to back up.
I'm reading the recommendations. The recommendations aren't asking us to proceed with anything today, they're asking us to receive and file the informational report. So we're not approving anything. We're not blessing anything. We are gathering information and giving
feedback, right? Yes, that is exactly what we're doing and I think we're pretty clear to folks who So with that.
I would like to make a motion that we adopt staff recommendations, A through C in today's staff report.
Thank you for that motion. Is there a second? Second. Motion has been made and seconded. Any discussion? Any comments? Roll call please.
Mr. Adam.
Aye.
Mr Lavinino.
Aye
Mister Williams
I
miss Hartman I chair heart.
I
motion passes unanimously
3:58 – 4:025 turns
and will now recess to close session County Council could you please read the items for consideration.
Chair and supervisors, today the board is agendized to consider eight matters in closed session. The first three are existing litigation, three separate cases. First case is Keller versus County of Santa Barbara. Next, McCrory versus Santa Barbara, two separate cases there. And then Alcox versus City of Lompoc and County of Santa Barbara. The board also has two matters of anticipated litigation involving significant exposure to civil litigation and two separate groups of real property items. The first group of real property items involves county-owned property at three separate addresses in Isla Vista, 970 Embarcadero Del Mar, 976 Embarcadero Del Mar and 881 Embarcadero Del Mar.
And then in the addendum, there was added a second group of real property negotiations concerning three separate properties. 6021 Hollister Avenue, Goleta, 117 North B Street in Lompoc and 6681 Berkshire Terrace, Goleta. The board also is agendized to consider one public employee performance evaluation for county executive officer. My estimate is that all of these items will take about two hours and about an hour-and-a-half without the county executive officer's performance evaluation.
Okay, well we'll come back about 230 and we'll then go back to closed session for the second half of that after we have the cannabis retail hearing. Beginning about 2 30
and if I may I need to recuse myself for one of the anticipated litigation items for conflict potential conflict of interest
And we'll take that one first so that you can join us Okay, thank you the board.
4:06 – 4:121 turns
Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
4:20 – 4:241 turns
Thank you. Hello.
4:30 – 4:311 turns
you You.
4:39 – 4:492 turns
the board.
Hello, everyone. you Thank you.
4:57 – 5:072 turns
Thank you.
You. you Hi.
5:15 – 5:191 turns
the board. Hello.
5:22 – 5:261 turns
Yeah. you Thank you.
5:34 – 5:512 turns
Thank you. Hello, everyone.
Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. This is a test. you
5:54 – 6:0712 turns
We're now reconvening the meeting of August 18, 2020 and County Council is going to defer its report on closed session because we are going to return to closed session after this next item. And
the next item is Department Item Number 4. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the county executive office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding storefront retail cannabis selection procedures within the unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara County.
Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I'm joined by my colleague, Stephen Yee, a fiscal and policy analyst for cannabis in our office. Today we're going to talk to you about some recommended actions Discuss the projected timeline for the issuance of licenses for the retail storefront cannabis outlets. And present to you, for your review and approval, two score sheets, one dealing with business operations plan and the other dealing with neighborhood compatibility.
Your recommended actions today are to receive our report on the timeline and the methodology for issuing a license. The review and approval of the two score sheets that I mentioned And the determination that this action is not a project under sequel. With that I'm going to turn it over to Stephen to walk you through the timeline for the issuance of the licenses.
She welcome.
Thank you, thank you Barney. Good afternoon chair hard members of the board as Mister mulligan mention will be presenting are projected cannabis retail storefront licensing selection process time. I'd like to emphasize that this is a projected timeline based on staff's best estimate as to when the various milestones will occur and therefore may be subject to change.
As you'll recall, this past January your board amended the Cannabis Business License Ordinance to establish a merit-based retail storefront selection process to replace the previously adopted random drawing selection process. This ordinance amendment went into effect on February 13th of this year Per the ordinance amendment, the retail storefront selection process was to commence with community meetings in each of the six community plan areas where cannabis retail storefront licenses may be located.
Notice of these community plan area meetings was provided 30 days prior to the commencement of these community meetings via press release, social media, an email blast to subscribers that have expressed interest in all cannabis-related news or events and informational postings to our cannabis website. This noticing occurred in the month of June. The six community meetings were held in the month of July due to COVID-19, staff conducted these meetings virtually rather than in person.
Per your board's direction, the intent of the community meetings was to obtain input from residents as to areas of concern relating to retail storefront operations. This input will then be incorporated into the neighborhood compatibility plan, which is a component of the retail storefront application. Here we are in August at the next milestone presenting to your board the application score sheet criteria.
In approximately mid-September staff anticipates making the final retail storefront application available to prospective applicants. We'll then have a minimum of 30 calendar days to complete their applications prior to the opening of the application submittal window. Per the business license ordinance, the application submittal window will be open for seven calendar days beginning approximately mid-October.
Shortly thereafter, in the fall, complete applications that are properly zoned for cannabis retail will be forwarded to the business licensing team for review and scoring of the Business Operations Proposal. These scores will be weighted at 25%. These applications will also be routed to an external third-party evaluator for review and scoring. Their scores will be weighted at 75%.
Applications obtaining an aggregate score of 85% or higher will proceed to the next phase. The next phase of review, scoring and ranking will also occur in the fall. Applications that receive an aggregate score of 85 percent or higher will be routed to an internal selection committee. This committee will consist of one assistant CEO and two senior staff. The internal selection committee will review and score the neighborhood compatibility proposal weighted at 100%.
Based on the resulting scores, applicants will be force-ranked for each of the community plan areas. The highest ranked applicants in each of the six community plan areas will then have 90 days to submit a land use entitlement application to the Planning and Development Department. This deadline will occur roughly in the spring of 2021. Once a permit application has been accepted for processing by Planning and Development, applicants may then take advantage of concurrent processing by submitting a full cannabis business license application.
Staff's best estimate as to when the land use entitlement and business license may be issued is approximately late spring of 2021. Next I'd like to discuss the survey results from our community meetings As previously mentioned, the intent of the community meetings was to gather valuable input from residents regarding areas of concern with respect to retail storefront operations and the criteria that they want applicants to address as part of the neighborhood compatibility proposal.
Through public comment both written and verbal in addition to submitted survey results staff collected close to 1,000 responses from residents where they ranked areas of concern The slide before you indicates the areas of greatest concern in descending order. As you can see, an appropriate location was of greatest concern to residents making up 28% of the survey results and or public comments.
This was followed by safety representing 21% of resident's concerns and then traffic and or parking at 17%. Finally, odor concerns about increases in commercial rents and exterior design were of equal concern to residents at 11% and 12%, respectively. And with that I'll turn the presentation back over to Mr. Melekian to discuss the score sheet criteria in greater detail.
Thank you Steven. One other note about community meetings is Steven indicated we have received almost 1,000 I'm pleased to announce that we will continue to provide responses to a survey that was posted online and remains online and will continue to do so throughout this process. The two score sheets of the two phases that we talked about, the first is the business operations score sheet which is the initial phase of scoring for the applicants.
It essentially is a technical document Each question with three exceptions carries a maximum possible score of five points. The three exceptions that we added, that we made 10 points for some extra weight. One is the overall project description which is item number one on the scoresheet. Second is our prior history of conducting cannabis operations in Santa Barbara County which is item number three on the scoresheet and the site security plan which focuses on cameras.
Availability selection processing as well as access control, which is item number 14 on the score sheet. The applications that the applicants that move through that process will then be evaluated on the neighborhood compatibility score sheet, which is far less technical in nature and more focused on responding to neighborhood and community concerns. We had three primary strategic objectives with respect to this. One is to ensure that the project selected will fit seamlessly into the surrounding neighborhood, wherever it is.
Secondly, address issues of community concern that are raised throughout this process and third, to maximize benefit to the broader community. The score sheet has seven aspects with again a possible score of 100%. The two highest weighted sections of the of the score sheet are number four, which is the community involvement plan. Which requires that the plan submitted Demonstrate that the restyle operation conform with community plan standards. Articulate some specific community benefits and perhaps most importantly to ensure the demonstrate that the ability of the community to express concerns directly to the retailer and to receive a response section number four on that score sheet is weighted at 35%.
Criteria number one is the site visit, which will be carried out by county staff. It will include visiting the actual location, ensure the compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods, looking at issues like ingress and egress to the site of vehicular and pedestrian, and proximity to sensitive areas such as residents' schools, youth centers, et cetera. In addition, there's a customer education plan which is designed to demonstrate that the retailer is providing information to those people who actually enter the store about the potency and effect of products.
And a community education plan which is essentially an outreach effort to describe what the business will be doing and what its purpose is and again information about the products. Additionally, there will be a neighborhood scoring on the neighborhood design compatibility and odor control in an onsite parking plan And with that I will I will stop and answer any questions that the board may have Questions for mr. Molechian or Mr. Yee
Supervisor Hartman
Well, first a comment and that is that I attended a number of the online outreach efforts and it was absolutely superbly done. And you developed some really fine technical tools, the interactive map. And I just was very proud to be associated with people who really knew their stuff and responded so well. My first question has to do with the relationship between the first phase of the process and Is it just a gate and once you get 85% then you're in and start again?
Am I clear on what I'm asking you?
Supervisor Hartman to the chair, you are clear. It was an item of discussion for the team. We actually had considered at one point that the neighborhood compatibility would only be 90% of the final score and that the totality of the plan would be an additional 10%. There was a sense, and we met with county council on this specific subject that in effect we would be double scoring the application plan. And it was unclear what the value of that was.
So your statement that in effect the business operations plan is phase one. It's the gatekeeper to move on in the process. You have to score 85% or more to move onto that second phase is accurate.
And then a couple more questions. Number six in phase two, odor control plan. Is odor an issue with retail cannabis?
Supervisor Hartman from everything from the people that we've talked to primarily in Santa Barbara City and including visiting the team the retail team actually visited Retail outlet in the city. It has not been it has not been an issue, but it has been a stated matter of public concern So we will be reviewing that
But you're unlikely to see a difference in applications on that particular factor if it's not only an issue that you can do anything to address
6:07 – 6:1415 turns
Perhaps.
Number three, the community education plan. I think it's very important to be explicit here. Cannabis is used for a broad array of purposes and many of them are positive but sometimes people have very adverse significant reactions And that's a matter of public health. And I think that has to be really highlighted and particularly it can, one thing I hear a lot about from psychologists is triggering schizophrenia or psychosis and that can happen especially in young people 18-24 or so.
I think we want to draw that out for women who are pregnant, for certain people who are vulnerable. We need to make sure that these retail operations play a bigger role in the public health risks associated with their product. My final question, the neighborhood design and compatibility. Some communities like Los Alamos are rather small some communities are bigger would the size of this retail storefront could that be a factor in neighborhood compatibility and design?
I would look to someone from the planning department may be able to expand on that. I think Jeff Wilson is available, but in our discussions around that particular aspect of the plan it was really an overarching sense of does this proposed operation fit in the commercial area where it's being placed? But I'll look to Jeff to see whether there's anything more he can expand on that about size.
Yeah let me just say a superstore in a small community wouldn't fit and so somehow that has to work into your criteria.
And it does. Jeff I don't know if there's anything you wanted to add?
Thank You Mr. Mulligan, Supervisor Hartman through the chair we would evaluate all the proposals for location siting in connection with the community plan standards and development standards So we would definitely look through the processing of that land use entitlement aspect of it and take into consideration as well. And so it's kind of a dual approach, the business license side and then of course we'll be looking at it through the planning development side.
Any other
questions? Mr. Chair? Yes.
I've got one. I kinda want to piggyback on what Supervisor Hartman was talking about with odor. You know, I've gone and visited a few of the retail establishments in Santa Barbara. And even when you're in it, I think we're all hearing so much about odor because of cultivation and that's something obviously we all have our ears up on and I guess our noses as well.
But when I'm looking at the score sheet You know, something that people have really expressed a lot of concern about that is scored relatively low is parking. And I also want to piggyback on Supervisor Hartman's comments about how well I think this program is working right now and the energy that's behind it and What a great job you're doing. So I don't want to go in and reinvent the entire wheel. My only two cents is if I had to change anything, it would be maybe tweaking down odor control just a little bit so that maybe it's 5% and boosting up on-site parking because there's nothing that can get a community upset quicker than You know, lack of parking in an area. So for me parking's a big part of it but I understand why odor control was put up as high initially but I just don't see how anybody is going to be able to...
To me everybody is going to score the same on number six and I think seven is actually something that could affect people even more.
And
I just would agree Supervisor Levin, you know if you're brighter Adam to the chair. We take these comments and our plan is we actually have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow afternoon to review the comments that we received from the board and make our final recommendations on And I think your points are both valid. There's no question that the odor control was really in there because it has been a Significant issue throughout discussions about cannabis since since we started this so we'll take a look at that
Any other questions for staff Supervisor Williams. I just
because there's been folks who have said well, it's either going to be here or there like an inevitability. I wanted to see if you and Jeff could kind of go over what the steps are my understanding is The selection process will pick one applicant in each community plan area. But that that applicant still has to go through a land approval, land use approval process just like any other use and we still sit as the quasi judicial body that would arbitrate an appeal for something that is discretionary And I just want to make sure that my understanding is correct.
Supervisor Williams to the chair, you are correct. Once the applicant has been selected and it's a forced ranking process through the score sheet, the applicant who comes out first then has to go through the land use and business license process before that license is awarded. And if for some reason that person were to fall out, then we would go to the next person that was in line for that community planner.
And so the
really the first part of the process is who can go forward what company. What app what application what site and then the second one is. They're going to go for it. I mean if I can kind
6:14 – 6:2010 turns
All right, let's go to public comment. I think we have a number of people interested in contributing.
Chair Hart and members of the board, we have 13 requests to speak on general or public comment on this item. We are going to begin with Steve Kent to be followed by Gary Buble.
Hello, Steve Kent.
Mr. Kent? Hello?
Yes we can hear you.
Okay.
Go ahead.
Okay Chairperson Hart County Supervisors. Yeah this is Steve Kent and I okay I first want to thank you for allowing me to speak in front of you. As some of you know, I've been actively involved in the Santa Claus Lane area for a really long time. Our property is located right in the center of the area as being addressed today. I therefore request having six minutes to share my thoughts with you at this time.
Mr. Kent, you'll have to limit your time to three minutes, Mr. Kent. It's only fair to everybody else we're given three minutes per person. And we have gotten your correspondence and all of us have read it.
And I have been a property owner on Santa Claus Lane for over the past 25 years, and I am vehemently opposed to any consideration for cannabis store on Santa Claus Lane now or ever in the future. The vast majority of business owners, property owners and neighbors are equally vehemently opposed. Honestly, Santa Claus Lane is absolutely the worst place in all of Santa Barbara County for a cannabis store.
Summerlin is probably the second-worst place. The Santa Claus Lane community is a tiny family oriented kid friendly cluster of stores with two active surf camps A restaurant with a popular playground to attract kids and families. The entire Santa Claus Lane should be deemed a sensitive receptor zone. Parking and traffic are already beyond capacity, especially in the summer. The infrastructure would be even more overwhelmed than it currently is if that's possible.
Yesterday I went by the two cannabis stores in Santa Barbara The security guard at one of the stores told me that there's approximately 30 to 50 cannabis customers coming to the store per hour, not per day, not per week but per hour and often much more on the weekends when our beach is already packed. Our parking is non-existent and the traffic congestion on Santa Claus Lane is a hazard and safety issue.
Neighbors Of the store complained about parking along the red car. Curbs in front of the store in front of the cannabis store as well as their stores as well as parking in their private parking areas. The location in Toro Canyon region would be the only cannabis store between the middle of downtown Santa Barbara and Ventura. It is mind boggling how much volume that would involve And how devastating this influx would have on the area.
There are only two possible locations for a cannabis store on Santa Claus Lane, the two buildings at the far end of the 101, uh, the far end near the 101 on ramp and 10 point road. One building will have only nine parking spaces in it in front of it and on the other side of Santa Claus lane Road. The other 11 spaces in the new streetscape plan That's all the parking. All of this will be for the cannabis customers, employees delivery van as well as all the other tenants.
6:20 – 6:287 turns
Thank you Mr Kent
We will now go to Gary Buble, to be followed by Nancy Emerson.
Hello, this is Gary Buble. I'm a resident of Summerlin California on June the 10th 2020 at the request of the Board of Directors of the Summerlin Citizens Association. A committee was formed to assess the collective sentiments of the Summerlin community regarding the possible approval and placement of a retail cannabis store in Summerlin during the period of July 6-12 Committee members sought input from the business community and residents using a formal, unbiased comprehensive survey that was developed for this purpose.
Responses were received from over 90% of the business community and more than 25% of the residents. The results of the survey were surprisingly overwhelming in opposition to having a retail cannabis store in Summerlin. The comments from those opposed When the business community was 88 percent and the residents was even more strongly opposed by 93 percent. The comments from those opposed were strongly against the idea of a store and in summary Summerlin does not want a retail cannabis store in the community.
Summerlin has no formal authoritative legislative structure like the Carpinteria and Santa Barbara City Council's So it's dependent on the supervisors of the county of Santa Barbara to make decisions based on its interests. However, the All Volunteer Summerland Citizens Association does represent the views of the community. The SCA has issued a letter for the supervisor strongly opposing a retail store in Summerlin based on the results of the survey that was done.
Today the supervisors are taking a vote on the Neighborhood Compatibility Score Sheet which will be used to select the winning proposal from the retail applicants. One criteria in this score sheet identifies Community Involvement Plan as worth 35%. This item, as currently written, does not take into account the community's views on whether or not a retail store is wanted And the remaining 65% of the score sheet covers issues which are totally out of the community's control.
I'm not aware what, if any, a passing score must be to select a winner and there appears to be no failing score. I commend the supervisors on developing a systematic process for selecting a winner for our retail cannabis store in the six locations identified. However, the process you established assumes all locations want a store And it's set up to pick a winner for each location.
A significant flaw in your process was to fail to consider or even take the time to ask if a community wanted a retail store in its location. Summerlin has clearly indicated they do not want a store. If a community like Summerlin is so strongly opposed to a retail cannabis store, why are you continuing to consider a store in that location? It seems like a waste of the applicant's time and effort, and also the members of the county supervisor's office given the opposition by the community.
This begs the question does this imply that community input doesn't matter in your decision process? Thank you for letting me have this opportunity to speak to the board today.
Thank you Mr. Gould.
We will now go to Nancy Emerson to be followed by Nancy Swanson.
Good afternoon Nancy Emerson. We watch Sandy in this valley. We really appreciate the efforts of Mr. Malek in and his staff to research educate and involve the community in the development of the retail cannabis selection procedures. We'd like some interactive map feedback survey too. We found no mention in the board letter of a plan for informing community area residents about the list of applicants for storefront retail licenses and the location of storefront in each area before the scoring is done. And also when this top scoring applicant is chosen, and we would like to see The community informed about these steps as a measure of transparency. I realize that for staff there can be some downsides because people may be unhappy, but I think it's important for the public to be aware of what's going on.
The score sheet for the business operation seems very thorough. I'm a little confused. There's no mention on the score sheet about the criminal history evaluation by the sheriff's office, but I understand, I'm assuming that if that's questionable then the application would not go further is that correct? And finally the neighborhood compatibility score sheet feedback Ranked inappropriate location as the respondents greatest concern.
However, the community improvement plan ranks highest at 35%. We think residents would want greatest weight given to site visit neighborhood design compatibility and parking as mentioned by Mr. Loving you know rather than such a high score Allotted to the community improvement plan. We think that community customer education plan in particular is more an aspect of marketing showing how well thought out the business plan is more than how compatible it is with the neighborhood And we suggest that it be part of the business operations score sheet. Thank you.
Thank you, Miss Emerson.
6:28 – 6:355 turns
We will now go to Nancy Swanson to be followed by Ryan Reed.
My name is Nancy Swanson. I'm the executive director of the Link Foundation, we're a private foundation located for the past 13 years at 3749 Santa Claus Lane. I've resided in Carpinteria for almost 30 years and take pride and have so much gratitude to be part of this special community. I wanted to voice my opposition along with other community members that are overwhelmingly against the cannabis retail store on Santa Claus Lane This is an inappropriate location. Requirements of a cannabis shop is that it has to be 750 feet from a child care center or school. I want to emphasize that all of Santa Claus Lane provides a healthy, safe and fun environment to our beach community for children of all ages with its surf shops, surfing camps and family friendly dining not to mention the incredible stretch of beach all used throughout the year by children of all ages.
This is absolutely an inappropriate location for a cannabis store and will ruin the family-friendly beach neighborhood that is designed with children at the forefront. It is inconsistent with a family friendly community that has been here for many years, and puts children's safety at great risk. It's unbelievable that this area is even being considered as a potential site for a cannabis store.
Second, a cannabis store creates a very unsafe and dangerous location for children. My sons were surf camp counselors I came as a teen to Santa Claus Lane to play on the beach and shop at the candy store that was here for many years. Allowing the potential of a cannabis store will attract unwanted loitering, illegal activity, and generally an unhealthy environment for children.
The traffic in parking has been mentioned. The parking situation is already terrible with severe overcrowding and the lane is also a route for commute traffic to enter the 101 south at the end of the lane. Added traffic by the retail shop will worsen this already horrible and dangerous situation. My office space is the lane and I can tell you daily how many times we have witnessed cars moving by on the lane with children at risk of being struck by a car. The situation will only intensify and put more children at risk with a cannabis store.
And finally, the potential store owner is offering three times the going rate for the cannabis space and the only reason to consider that space was because it's the excessive amount of rent they're willing to pay and that is not the reason to make a decision. In addition, the demand for one available license could drive up the cost of other commercial rents. We do not want a cannabis retail store in our community. This is really a beloved unique beach community that would be ruined by a cannabis retail store. Please vote no on this proposal and save our special Carpinteria Beach neighborhood. Thank you so much.
We will now go to Ryan Reed to be followed by Mary Jo Siborn Siburn Nagel.
Hello chairpersons and supervisors. Thank you so much for the opportunity to entertain public comment on. Hello chairperson, supervisors I want to thank you so much for the opportunity to have this public comment. Thank you for opening up this opportunity I am the business owner directly next to where one of the proposed potential dispensaries will be located. I understand from our neighbor tenant that they are pushing very hard to become that. I share a driveway with this business and so as the tenant next door, I'm very nervous about what this will happen, what it'll do to my business. I've been here for, oh, it's been about 15 years. We've helped the resurgence of Santa Claus Lane.
Remember when the lobster shack was next door, which is now where they're proposing or where they would like to have a dispensary and I. Man, I swept out all the candy out of Santa Claus kitchen. I helped throw the toys away and we've worked very hard to bring this lane back to a beautiful shopping district quaint stores in these restaurants and surf lessons and surf schools and the kids that walk maybe 30 or 40 by my front door every single day and to imagine The need for as they were saying with the study they're doing that need for proper security cameras and proper armed guards or at least security guards.
The juxtaposition that is to what I enjoy today in our store and on our lane is just shocking. And again not to be not to put it too dramatically I just imagine armed guards are guards and a line full of folks purchasing what is legal drugs to use and the difference between our current clientele how hard we've worked in the last 20 years We've brought a lot of shops to our areas. It's become this bustling area where folks come up from L.A. or down from Bakersfield or north and they stop and shop. It has brought a lot of business to our community, small business obviously the heart of the community in it. I really believe very firmly that all of the businesses along here is certainly the ones closest will shrivel up and die. Mine in particular for sure people will not want to shop in my store.
It's a nice homey family type business. They're not going to want to park their cars there and walk next to that and the folks that brings it's just really scary I think it's really gonna be I think eventually we'll Santa Claus Lane will go back to what it was right? I came down here when it was Lobster Shack and Santa had just left and we were trying to bring it back to life. Many people tell me don't move your business will die well, we've been a part of the resurgence in last 20 years and I'm afraid Turn the clock back. So again, thank you so much for your time. I know it's valuable and I just appreciate it so much. Thanks for hearing me out.
Thank you Mr Reed.
6:35 – 6:428 turns
We will now go to Mary Jo Sybil Nagel to be followed by Anna Carrillo.
My name is Mary Jo Silbernagel and I'm a property owner in Old Orkett since 1974. My first question is this, who sits on that internal group who's going to be doing the score sheet? And the reason why I'm asking that is because I think those folks are going to have some discretion on how they score. Yes, it's very laid out and I appreciate the time and effort that they have made in trying to come up with a score sheet but as Summerland and Santa Claus Lane, the folks in Old Orkut are totally against it. There has been thousands of signatures, somewhere around 8000 about not wanting a storefront in Old Orkut.
A building has already been bought by a owner of a storefront in San Luis Obispo, which for all intents and purposes he feels like he's in. And I hope he's not but there are six other places in Orkut which I know it has to be in one of those and I really wish that they would take Old Orkutt out of there. I don't know how they came up with Old Orkutt other than the fact We have three elementary schools and a preschool. So yes, 800 feet away but not 750, you know?
So those are my concerns. I am very fearful for our little town. I know it has to be somewhere in Orkut. I'm not happy with that but that's done and over with so those are my concerns. And like I said, who are these people in this internal group who are going to do the scoring?
Thank you Ms. Weber-Nickel.
We will now go to Anna Carrillo to be followed by Devin Wardlow.
My name is Anna Carrillo and I'm a resident of the Toro Canyon community plan and also a neighbor right next door to the Summerland community plan. I was heartened to see the results of the virtual community that there were increases in the neighborhood compatibility proposal But 35% given to community involvement is still not a high enough percentage for this permanent entitlement. That's my biggest concern, is that this land use permit will be permanent? I feel it should be at least 51%, including like what Mr. Buble said, does the communities want it? I also appreciate the survey that was sent but there was no timeline put and so I definitely want that survey That was online to be included.
I don't think a cannabis retail operation is suitable, appropriate in Santa Claus because of the surf camps, the kids, the beach friendly, the parking, the traffic, the Caltrans storage yard, the on-ramp to the 101. There's no law enforcement there. There's not even lifeguards on the beach. In Summerlin the survey, I was very impressed with the survey that you know was done. Again the concern is the traffic, the parking and the neighborhood compatibility. The community plan has been very successful in pursuing revitalization of their businesses which include their beach, antique stores, furniture stores, the nursery and restaurants and have created a nice culture in Summerlin encouraging much pedestrian tap traffic. Since these two areas only have a C-1 and C-2 zoning, the Coastal Development Permit will be heard ministerially.
Whereas if there's mixed use like in the inland areas, there will be a CUP required and so there is more public comment. I think they need to be the same for both areas. And again it's this permanent land use entitlement that concerns me. There is also a property in Montecito. I brought it up before Lisa Plowman has you know agreed with me also there is a property in Montecito that could be used and it should have been included as one of our three areas for in the first district. So thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
Can I ask the public speaker a question, Mr. Chair? Sure. I think she left it well maybe maybe on if she's listening, she could provide this because the community involvement plan is 35%, but the other ones are neighborhood design compatibility 15%. Odor control 10%, on-site parking 10%, community education plan 5%, customer education plan 5%. And the site visit, 20%. So I appreciate the idea that the community involvement plan should be higher in percentage. But which one of these metrics should be lower to give that a higher percentage? Because all these other metrics are also community-related metrics.
So could I get just that
elaboration? She's going to she's off the line so we're going to have to do that okay different and then I just
you know what one other thing that. Technically she is correct that there is a spot it is a parking lot. That abuts the city of Santa Barbara. So I don't think there's any mystery why
6:42 – 6:489 turns
We will now go to Devin Wardlow, to be followed by Joe Armadaris.
Hello County Supervisors. It is wonderful to see you all even if it's over the screen. My name is Devin Wardlow I am the Director of Public Affairs for Coastal Dispensary and also a long time Santa Barbara resident. I grew up here. I attended Santa Barbara High. I graduated from UCSD and I'm now working to open the first cannabis store in my hometown College of Isla Vista. I want to thank the Board of Supervisors and their staff for their work on the Cannabis Retail Ordinance and their willingness to take the time to get this done correctly.
As a current cannabis operator in downtown Santa Barbara, I appreciate the board's work to ensure that neighborhood compatibility and community involvement are prioritized in the selection process. I am very proud of the retail cannabis industry that we have created in Santa Barbara thus far and appreciate the board taking action to ensure that new operators coming into our community will be encouraged to pursue a community-based approach in their operations.
In reference to Supervisor Hartman's comments on the value slash competitiveness of applicants odor control plan, I would agree that odor control plans will be similar across the board and that the points could be better devoted to another aspect. At this point, I would suggest considering adding an aspect of history of demonstrated support to allow applicants to detail how they've bettered their communities in the past specifically here in Santa Barbara or whatever jurisdiction they come from. That's just a thought. But overall, I'm very appreciative of the work of this board as well as all the staff. I know this has been a long time and I really look forward to working with the county to get this done and successful. So thank you all very much.
Thank you Ms. Wardlaw.
Unfortunately we were unable to get ahold of Joe Armideris so we are going to mark Berkeley to be followed by Patricia French.
Thank you Board Chair Hart and board members. I'm Mark Brickley and for 25 years I've lived about a mile from Summerlin. While I respect the work of Mr. Malikian and Mr. Yee in the CEO's office, the storefront retail cannabis scoring process underweighed community input. And because of this, I think very serious flaw alone, the planning document should not be approved.
I want to state my other opposition to a retail cannabis store in Summerland and Santa Claus Lane. There's no benefit to placing a retail cannabis store in Summerland or on Santa Claus Lane, doing so will only create new problems including the need for additional law enforcement presence and for resolving parking problems just when 101 is about to be widened through both Santa Claus Lane And Somerland in this freeway project will force lots of traffic on the Somerlin streets.
I want to point out that someone has no grocery store we have two liquor stores a couple of restaurants and other retail businesses but there's no place to buy staples like bread meat and eggs. And this really became apparent in 2018 when we had the flood in the freeway which was closed down Yet the Board of Supervisors is considering placing a cannabis store in Summerland. And finally, I would like to say that the placement of a retail cannabis store in Summerland will change its character forever.
It will become a destination to buy drugs not the family-oriented community it's become. Please reject this flawed storefront proposal. Thank you.
Thank You Mr. Berkeley
And we will now go to Patricia French to be followed by Devin Martinez.
My name is Patricia French. I am one of 175 residents who live on Padaro Lane, who are opposed to the cannabis dispensary on Santa Claus Lane. I would like you all to consider what is the compatibility of a cannabis dispensary on a small beach road? You've already heard how the impact on traffic and I would like to add If this hasn't been said already, what have you studied the relationship between a cannabis dispensary and attracting crime?
The United States Senate has taken this up. And if you haven't looked at that, it's very alarming. Please consider at least if you cannot turn down a cannabis dispensary on Santa Claus Lane, Tabling this motion until the improvement project on the lane is finished.
Thank you
6:48 – 7:0019 turns
We will now go to Devin Martinez to be followed by Nancy Riccolo
This is Devin Martinez. I want to thank the board for your time and consideration. My first comment is while I understand the importance of a proposed dispensary's location, I'd like to get clarity on the reasoning behind the site visit slash site location representing such a large portion of the neighborhood compatibility portion. As a previous commenter has stated it seems that there may be other portions of phase two scoring which should get a little more emphasis than the site visit portion.
It's a little confusing how the phase one score of the business proposal application is going to be leveraged into the second phase and ultimately, the final approval of licenses. I'd like to see more clarity on how the phase one score will affect the final score of phase two but also would like to emphasize the importance of the board taking extra consideration in assessing applicants' business operations experience and how that experience affects the second phase of scoring.
Thank you so much for your time. That is it from my comments.
Thank you, Mr. Martinez.
We will now go to Nancy Riccolo to be followed by Renee O'Neill who's our final speaker.
My name is Nancy Riccolo and I am a property owner on Santa Claus Lane. I also vehemently oppose any consideration for a cannabis storefront on Santa Claus Lane, now or ever. The vast majority of property owners, the businesses and the neighbors are very opposed to this as well. Santa Claus Lane is a narrow single street with one entrance. A cannabis store is sure to have a high volume of customers that was going to completely overwhelm our infrastructure We already have tremendous parking and traffic issues as it is. We are a tiny beachfront strip, and this is just going to completely overwhelm us.
The existing businesses are going to be squeezed out because their customers will not have a place to park. These stores, I would remind you, are already barely hanging on. We've been through the Thomas fire, the debris flow with flooding in the area, and now this devastating pandemic that is not gonna be past us for at least a year Then we have the 101 widening project and the streetscape project on Santa Claus Lane that is going to further restrict access to the lane and parking on top of that.
In conclusion, I would say that allowing a cannabis store on Santa Claus Lane will create absolute chaos and it's going to ruin our community treasure. I'm asking for a permanent ban on cannabis storefront on Santa Claus Lane because the survival of businesses depend on it The welfare of the area depends on it and the sanity of our neighbors depend on it. If you have to amend the cannabis ordinance in Santa Barbara County to make that a permanent commitment, please do so because anything short of that doesn't help us a bit.
Lastly I would agree that as far as weighting community input, I feel like it's underweighted in your survey, your selection process Odor control for a retail business is not an issue at all. Odor control is an issue strictly for cultivation incidentally on Santa Claus Lane we already have a cultivation that it's going across the highway from us so we will have odor from that but not from the retail business. That 10 percent odor should be put towards increasing the weighting of parking and traffic or community input and compatibility. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Ms. Riccolo.
And we will now go to our final speaker, Renee O'Neill.
I want to thank the board Barney Mielecki and your amazing team for taking all the time and effort that you put into this cannabis retail process. In listening to all the speakers, I'm 100% in support of the folks that are expressing the concerns regarding where these retail stores are located in relation to the various communities. I agree when I was filling out the form There seem to be a real lack of questions for community input.
So I've been giving this some thought, and I'm just going to throw this out there to everybody. You might find this rather strange. What if instead of having a retail store here, there or anywhere that is going to be in a residential area or in a traditional retail center area that there is one building set aside per zone. In an in a location that is far removed from the problematic areas for example, a warehouse or a building like that where maybe multiple vendors in time could share the space Share the cost of security whatever and have a kiosk where security guards could allow only authorized adults to enter the parking lot.
I'm just throwing this out there because I don't believe anyone is going to be happy with a cannabis store in their neighborhood including me so I want the board to maybe give this some thought and consider Alternatives for where cannabis retail stores can be placed. I think it's important that those are done appropriately just as I have always felt cannabis regulations should be done appropriately.
How much time do I have left? I can't hear you because I can't turn your speaker on anyway. Again I want to thank the board and I want to thank Barney Malekian. I think we are so lucky to have him on our team and Stephen Yee all you guys, I guess I'll just say thank you to all the speakers who have made some excellent brought up excellent concerns. Oh oh and Supervisor Labanino thank you for bringing up the traffic concern as well. I appreciate that.
All right you guys let's rethink this and do this one right. Thank you for listening bye.
Thank you, Ms. O'Neill and thank you for the nice comments about the hard work our staff have done. Mr. Malekian appreciates it I'm sure.
And that was our final speaker.
Okay back to the board for comments and discussion.
Chair?
Yes Supervisor Levenstam.
Thank you but I think it was I guess it wasn't a big shock that a majority of the people that called in were opposed. One of the sentiments that we heard though was that there wasn't enough community input. And especially coming out of Summerland, we heard about a poll, a survey that was done. I just want to remind people about another survey that was done in Summerland, it was called Prop 64.
And I just went and pulled some stats for Summerlin. Summerlin has 1,252 registered voters and 1,105 voted in that election. That's an 88.25% turnout. So first off hats off to Summerlin you kicked butt going into the polls. Prop 64 which legalized cannabis had a 70% yes vote, 70.05, 774 yes votes, 331 no votes. So I want to keep in the perspective that when we hear public comment and people say well nobody supports this.
Well, you know we also heard nobody supports this but there's going to be chaos at these stores because there's going to be so many people trying to get into the store. So I like the plan that we have. I think Mr. Melekian and Mr. Yee have done yeoman's work. There is no perfect solution. And I understand that there are places that these stores will work and places where they're not going to work. And I think we have a great tool in front of us to be able to weed out and find the best location that works for everybody.
Well, not for everybody but obviously there's gonna be some people that are not gonna be happy with it period. Yes, the least worst I guess as Supervisor Adam just gave me that. So you know I'm happy where we're at. I think this is a great process so far and like all the community input that's happened so far I think for example like the Orchid community came and had their voice heard. I think loud and clear they said no to Old Town Orchid and that's going to weigh in. That's all going to be factored into the selection process.
Those are my comments at this point.
Thank you, Supervisor Lavinino. Any other comments? Supervisor Hartman?
I just had a question Dr. Malekian about the hours and days of operation for the cannabis. Are those in any way defined, constrained?
Supervisor Hartman to the chair. We have not discussed that specifically That would be certainly be part of both the land use and the business licensing process as when we get to that point
And then I guess my final comment is just on the odor control plan if that's not really something that's going to distinguish applicants, then I think maybe We would put those points elsewhere where we really can get differentiate use this to differentiate
So Supervisor Hartman, I was going to bring up anyway we were discussing with County Council. The board can make that approval this afternoon and staff certainly has no concerns about shifting points away from the odor control aspect to say parking and traffic or another area. And it's really just a matter of you directing staff how you want those points allocated
7:00 – 7:0910 turns
Do you have a recommendation? You've given a lot of thought to this.
I do. I actually concur with the observation that on-site parking issues and traffic control issues are pretty significant piece of the community impact, and I would suggest moving item number 6 to 5% and item number 7 to 15%. The other comment I would make is that you made an observation about the importance of public health advisories and there are health warnings in number two. And so our commitment, I don't know that we have to change anything but we certainly can emphasize in the scoring piece for that about public health announcements et cetera.
Yeah I think for two and three, I could see. And I just think that's really important so every time I get a chance I like to emphasize that. For myself, I just want to say this has come a long way. Initially, we were thinking of simply a lottery with pre-qualified applicants. I think this really gives us an opportunity to tailor it to the community and we're continuing to do that to calibrate. And you might want to just talk a little bit more because we had a public comment about who the team would be evaluating this but I'm supportive.
The phase 2 scoring, the neighborhood compatibility scoring is myself the planning director or her designee and a third senior county official that hasn't been decided yet.
We also had a question about whether criminal background checks were done. I think you were ready to answer that.
Chair Hart, yes. Criminal background checks are part of the sheriff's security review of the operator in the business license process and if the person has a criminal record They would be disqualified from getting a business license. That actually applies to anybody who owns, I'm going to draw blank on the percentage but an ownership piece of the company that same caveat applies. There was also
another question for Mr. Martinez about why the site visit points were so high and then he had a follow-on question about How do the phase one scores carry over to the phase two evaluation?
Chair Hart, the Phase 1 scores are really the gateway to Phase 2. The Phase 1 score as I mentioned is a very technical document. It really is are you complying with the ordinance? Here's all of the information that the ordinance requested. We did make some weighting decisions particularly around local experience and site security which includes the background check But essentially if you and that and that phase one is going to be scored by a 3rd party evaluator.
And that contract the proposed contract will be coming to the board on September, 1st. But the applicant has to score 85% or higher. To move on to phase 2 which is the neighborhood compatibility piece so it's a gatekeeper process. Thank you
supervisor Williams.
Well, I have heard some of this dialogue and some of these fears before. I was part of the discussion about dispensaries in the city of Santa Barbara. I served on the City Council for seven years And there was a lot of public angst and a lot of public fear about that. But if you go down to the two Chapala different locations, one of them near Chapala and Mission and the other one near Chapala and Carrillo just mere blocks from here You don't see.
You know it being and an attractive nuisance. And so I do think that Have advocated that. The path of towards dispensaries is that I as a regulator and as someone who views themselves as supportive of law enforcement tools, I feel like. Delivery service which is right now the dominant part of the market. Is not a great. It's not great for our communities. As a regulator, I would much rather have a location that I can look at their security cameras and our staff can ascertain what's happening in the site than bunches of cars rolling around without a whole lot of government oversight.
And so to me, really the way I view this is not whether or not there should be a dispensary in a community but more whether or not there should be one dispensary in a community. Or if every house is a de facto dispensary because of the dominance of delivery services on the market. That's my view globally. And now I'll just sort of give you my district view which is starting to become a little contradictory.
You know, I have had my doubts whether there'd be really community support on the Santa Claus Lane area for some time. And I did think that there might be community support in Summerland if it was a substantial community benefit like grocery store which seems to come up All the time. And as part of the reason why we have adjusted this framework every time we've discussed it to make the community benefit a larger piece of the puzzle is that we do want there to be community benefits out there.
So the community. I think marijuana has created. Benefits by saving public services like sheriffs Like child welfare workers. But I wanted to see something more substantive in terms of like, or at least more immediate in terms of community benefits for a given area. Um, the survey that was done puts a, uh, throws a lot of cold water on that. And I, um, So I think part of that may be that you know applicants haven't really reached out enough to the community.
I think that's I will castigate you know, you all you've got to really articulate why a community should want and I know that coronavirus is probably a factor in that but to me I think that. The views of the public. Do matter. I can't see. Me supporting a dispensary. In Santa Claus Lane or Summerlin That doesn't mean I think we should change the process. I think that the process still has room for dissent and a yes or no question on whether dispensary should go forward but you know, I am increasingly convinced Not headed.
In the direction of at least me sporting a dispensary at those locations.
7:09 – 7:1110 turns
I'm gonna make a run at a motion here. I'm ready to adopt staff's recommendations A and B, and C with the caveat that we lower the odor control to 5% and we increase parking to 15%, and D. Thank you there's a
motion
on the floor. I
would second that if we also raise community involvement plan, I guess by taking a little off the site visit to raise community involvement plan to 40% and site visit 15 or something like
Okay, I'm gonna second Supervisor Adams and I don't want to redo the entire score sheet. So I think this was a really simple easy change to lower odor control and go to something that's more important like parking so I will second Supervisor Adams.
Motion has been made and seconded any discussion? Supervisor Hartman your light is on oops that's okay anybody wanna add anything else?
I still think we should raise the community involvement plan
Okay motions on the floor. Let's do a roll call. Thank you for all the hard work. Thank you for all the citizens who participated today and all the surveys in the community meetings, there's been a lot of good information and additions to the conversation and the staff will continue doing its work. We are now going to again recess to closed session. And County Counsel, do you need to read this item into the record?
No it's the same list that I had read previously and then I'll read out from closed session when we're done with the next and final section.
Thank you very much.
7:15 – 8:281 turns
Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Hello. Yeah. the board. . you Thank you. Hello. Yeah. you the board. Hello. Yeah.
8:34 – 8:376 turns
We are reconvening from closed session. Would county council please report out from closed session?
Chair and supervisors, today in closed session the board was agendized including through the addendum on Friday eight separate closed session items. The first three items were existing litigation Keller versus County of Santa Barbara, McCrory versus County of Santa Barbara which was two separate cases and finally Alcox versus City of Lompoc and County of Santa Barbara There was also a conference with legal counsel concerning two matters of anticipated litigation for significant exposure to litigation.
The first group of real property negotiations involved properties in Isla Vista at 970 Embarcadero Del Mar, 976 Embarcadero Del Mar and 881 Embarcadero Del Mar. Through the addendum, there was also added a second property negotiations session involving three separate properties. 6021 Hollister Avenue, Goleta, 117 North B Street in Lompoc and 6681 Berkshire Terrace, Goleta.
And the final closed session item was public employee performance evaluation for county executive officer. There are no reportable actions.
Thank you Mr. Guzzoni and we will adjourn in recognition of the 100 year anniversary Of women's suffrage in the United States. Today is the day August 18th 1920 when the 19th amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified and it's a reminder of the incredible contributions that women make and leadership in our community and the additional work that we have to do to make sure that women are truly equal in our community and our society.
And just for a moment think how in trouble this country would be if women didn't exactly I mean
come on We are adjourned until the next board meeting which is Tuesday, August 25th 2020.
the board.