UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:001 turns
Thank you.
0:03 – 0:0625 turns
I will call to order the August 25th, 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Would the clerk please call the roll?
Ms. Hartman? Here. Mr. Adam?
Here.
Mr Lavinino?
Here!
Mr. Williams? Here Chair Hart?
The next item of business is approval of the minutes of August 18th. Is there any discussion? Is there a motion?
Move
approval.
Motion has been made and seconded. Would the clerk please call the roll?
Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?
Aye
Mr. Williams?
Aye.
Chair Hart?
Aye.
Motion passes unanimously.
CEO Miyasato, is there a CEO report today?
Chair Hart, there's no report this morning.
Thank you and Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Hart and members of the board I just have a couple quick announcements this morning. I would like to remind members of the public who are participating in our board meeting today there are alternative methods of public participation And if you would like to provide public comment on any item on today's agenda or general public comment, you can provide that by phone. If you would like to make a comment by phone please call 805-568-2240 and if you state your name, your phone number and which item you would like to speak on the clerk will call you at the appropriate time. I would also like to remind the public, please make every effort to be available and mute all streaming devices once it is your turn to speak. And momentarily we will be having that phone number scrolling atop your screen.
Additionally my final announcement this morning is that we received a request from the department to trail administrative item 16 from community services till after departmental item number six as they are related and that is to consider recommendations regarding an agreement for operations of a countywide library system. So if we can just add that to the balance of the administrative agenda when we get there, that would be great. Thank you.
Thank you very much for those announcements.
The next item is approval of the administrative agenda and I know that we have a request from Supervisor Adam to take number 29 off.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
Are there other requests to pull items off the administrative agenda? And are there any other Request from the public to pull items on the agenda.
Chair Hart and members of the board, we have no requests to speak from the public on the administrative agenda. Okay
Mr. Gazzone you had a comment?
Chair Hart and Supervisors yes I would like to address a matter of
public comment that was provided in writing concerning open session agenda item 828. And that item involves, in fact maybe the clerk of the board could just read that item
Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board. Administrative item number 28 is from Public Works Board of Directors Water Agency. It is to consider recommendations regarding amendments the Kachuma project master contract and member unit contracts and there is a fourth this vote required on this item.
0:06 – 0:102 turns
And Chair and Supervisors, this item includes recommended actions about extending the Kachuma Project master contract and member unit contracts for no more than three years. We worked closely with the County Water Agency on this item and from that workup we understand two things. Water Agency expects that Bureau of Reclamation would use this period of up to three years in order to address yield study information towards a new long-term contract.
And second, that the value of executing these extensions now is it helps to provide confidence in a secure water supply. County Council attorneys and water agency managers have received correspondence from local attorney Mr. Dorwin concerning his client who has a parcel in that area or parcels in that area, and those communications included in-person meetings At County Council, we recommended to Mr. Dorwin that to resolve his client's issues which were addressed in the public comment that he contact the Ocean View Homeowners Association which would need to be part of any voluntary termination of an easement and also the Bureau of Reclamation which has the ownership of the property at issue.
The underlying facts of this case include a portion of private Ortega Ridge Road that was acquired by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1955, about 65 years ago. A county easement that was acquired in 1989 more than 30 years ago. And also in 1989, the counties transfer that easement to the Ocean View Homeowners Association. All of this sounds at least familiar or similar to facts and issues that the Ninth Circuit held in 2019 did not state a claim that would support a vehicle access easement over what sounds like the same land owned by the Bureau of Reclamation. That case is Payne versus U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
in 2019. After looking at the easement dispute that runs back to around 1955, I have three legal recommendations to you today as the Board of Directors. First we believe at County Council that the assertions in the objection really involve a real property or quiet title dispute that seems most likely was time barred more than a decade ago. Second, the assertions concerning the easement that were made by Mr. Dorwan.
Mr. Dorwan's assertions do not involve any rights that would prevent the Board of Directors from properly exercising its discretion today to approve or not approve the recommended actions for A-28. And the Board of Supervisors nonetheless could consider Mr. Dorwan's assertions downstream in a closed session for threatened litigation, and we plan to agendize that. But in conclusion, my legal opinion is that the board may properly act today concerning the recommended actions at A28.
Thank you, Mr. Guzzone, for that clarification. I think at this point, Madam Clerk, could you please read item A29 into the record?
0:10 – 0:1226 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board. Administrative item number 29 is from Public Works Board of Directors Water Agency. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County 2020 Groundwater Basin Summary Report.
And Supervisor Adam did you want to recuse yourself on this one?
Yeah I do. I have various business interests and some of them are in litigation on these matters and so I should just recuse
Thank you will take care of this and then have you back for the rest of the administrative agenda agenda. So is there any discussion of this item or a motion.
Move item a 29. I
mean that I I was under
I don't think that was Mr. Guzzone's point, he said there could be a potential future closed session item.
So I think we're talking about two separate items. I was commenting about 828 which was the Kachuma issue and this is 829, the groundwater.
That's right, that's right. Okay then I'll second it. Motion has been made and seconded, any discussion? Roll call please.
Ms. Hartman. Aye. Mr. Lavinino.
Aye.
Mr Williams. Aye Chair Hart. Motion passes 4 to 1, the supervisor Adam recused.
Thank you which brings us to the balance of the administrative agenda is there did you say there were any public members that wanted to pull an item?
Chair Hart and members of the board we had no further requests on the administrative agenda.
Move approval of the administrative the balance of the administrative agenda except for a 16 which will trail
Okay, thank you very much for the motion. Is there a second? Second. Okay, motion's been made and seconded. Any discussion? Roll call please.
Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adam?
Aye
Mr. Lavinino?
Aye
Mr. Williams?
Aye
Chair Hart?
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
Thank you Now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the board's agenda today. Madam Clerk, are there any requests to speak on items that are not on today's agenda?
0:12 – 0:186 turns
Chair Hart and Members of the Board, we have one request to speak on general public comment today and that is Renee O'Neill.
Good morning Supervisors. I'm calling to express my displeasure and frustration with the escalating issues in Tempe State with cannabis since the cannabis ban growers are not only ignoring the new ordinance they're actually expanding and disregarding their laws as usual We have been pleading with your support for six years. I believe we have been more than patient waiting for enforcement our health safety and sense of well-being is being compromised and jeopardized daily because Santa Barbara County has failed to uphold and enforce the regulations set forth by this state and this county.
As a result, I've had to turn to other agencies to get support. I have been forced to take this to the level of the state attorney general at this point. I have written to the California Department of Food and Ag, I've spoken to their attorneys, they have read the civil grand jury report that came out last June and have strongly urged me and others in our community and county to take Matters up with the Attorney General.
I have been trying to resolve this problem for six years in our community, the county of Santa Barbara has failed to support us. Last in the last two years my husband was diagnosed with asthma and this is a result of the traffic that is going through our property on an ongoing basis we had 251 Different cannabis related vehicles going through our property in the last 13 days. That's two hundred and fifty one and they are on Tepeskaya Road also the growers have used and taken from our community without permits for wells 151,400 gallons of our water in just 13 days This water is being trafficked through my property 20 in and now multiple water tanker trucks this morning at 6.30 the caravan of workers that typically comes in to start the next harvest process came in at 6 30 this morning this means they'll be an additional 30 Or more vehicles on our driveway every single day.
I'd like to know what the county plans to do about this? Are there any questions or comments?
Thank you, Miss O'Neill.
I just have a question for County Council in a reminder of when these operations have to close down because of the ban that was passed by the board
and if I might piggyback when did their provisional licenses come up
Chair and Supervisors, let me first start with the effective date of the prohibition of cultivation of cannabis in inland EDRNs. Existing developed rural neighborhoods, the board took action on that in July. It became effective August 13th. And the county issued notices to all those growing in inland EDRNs discussing the prohibition, discussing the phase out and abatement deadline of December 15th.
And then coordinating among the various departments to baseline what cultivation was occurring on those parcels so we'd be in position for enforcement on or after December 15th unless there are any different violations occurring between now and then. So that's the first part of this. I think Supervisor Hartman's question involves a three-part regulation scheme where a local land use authorization is one part, a local business license is another part and the state's transition from temporary to provisional licenses is the next part I don't have the grid in front of me for the expiration dates, parcel by parcel.
But those are no longer than one year and are not supposed to be renewed. The state licensing portion has been challenging in that as you remember the state has extended and changed those several times along the way but the current iteration of that our provisional licenses they cannot run but for more than one year and are not supposed
0:18 – 0:528 turns
Thank you for that additional information. With that, we are concluded with public comment which brings us to the next item, Department Item Number 1. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a presentation from REACH and Vandenberg Air Force Base on economic opportunities.
Ms. Anderson welcome.
Good morning, Mr. Chairman and members of the board. This item is an opportunity for REACH to provide an update on Central Coast projects and how the county can continue to be a partner in these efforts. We are fortunate also to have Colonel Masteler of the Vandenberg Air Force Base to present one of those projects related to the latest U.S. Space Force plans to enhance the domestic commercial space enterprise.
As a bit of background, in 2018 REACH, formerly the Hourglass Project was formed as a coalition of business and civic leaders who came together to develop region-wide economic actions To create high quality jobs throughout the Central Coast region focusing on San Luis Obispo County and northern counties, Santa Barbara County. The organization was created as a catalyst for fostering a prosperous economy and regional collaboration County representatives participated in the organization's strategy lab workshops to develop the 2030 regional plan as well as on-site discussions regarding the Vandenberg Air Force Base initiative.
More recently, the county successfully partnered with REACH during the COVID-19 pandemic response to develop the county's reopening and safe environment or RISE guide Work with REACH helped to facilitate more than 30 roundtable discussions with over 350 industry sector leaders to help businesses navigate the reopening process. The partnership effectively facilitated collaboration of various stakeholders and local government in a coordinated effort.
The recommended action today is to receive presentations on the Vandenberg Air Force Base Initiative and REACH 2030 Regional Action Plan, direct staff to continue participation in REACH efforts to promote economic vitality in Central Coast region and determine that the above actions are not a project under CEQA. Mr. Chairman I would like to now introduce our first speaker he is Colonel Anthony Mastelier of the 30th Space Wing at Vandenberg Air Force Base who will make a presentation on the Master Plan Initiative
Welcome Colonel Mastelier, pleasure to have you here with us today. Good morning Chair
Hart can you hear me okay? Yes
we can
thank you very much All right, great. Thank you so much and members of the board supervisors thank you for this opportunity and I use the word opportunity not just because it's a delight to speak with you all today but because the theme of this presentation is really about opportunities specifically where commercial space is concerned. I do have some charts if we're able to present those charts okay I see them we could go ahead and advance to the next one So specifically, what is my purpose?
To really it's twofold. One is to describe for the board that the unique situation that we're in right now as we transition to the United States Space Force As you all know, the Commander-in-Chief signed into legislation the National Defense Authorization Act for 2020. That occurred on December 20th of last year which gave rise to the sixth service of the armed forces, the United States Space Force.
One of the points of this presentation is to stress upon the members of the board, the fact that the U.S. Space Force absolutely believes it is in our nation's best interest to further develop and facilitate the industrial base which supports both national security space and more specifically domestic commercial space and space launch We're going to be looking at new forms of partnership At the federal, state and local levels of government and also partnering with industry and other non-federal entities such as REACH.
This is going to be critical to facilitating a robust commercial space enterprise for our nation and specifically here in the Central Coast. I'm often asked when senior leaders come out to visit the base, what is one takeaway that I would give that senior leader? And the one takeaway is that there is potential here, untapped potential here at Vandenberg Air Force Base.
And that's really what that second bullet, when you think about this as an opportunity rich environment combined with the fact that we have significant potential not just on the base but within the local area with respect to the local governments and the universities. It is absolutely the right time to capitalize on this particular situation. If we could go to the next slide So this is a build slide and the first part of this slide shows you these are the these are the customers that most recently Vandenberg has been working with. to facilitate National Security Space Launch. And you will recognize ULA, United Launch Alliance and of course SpaceX both of those launch providers have served customers throughout the national security enterprise and launched both out of the east coast and here out of the west coast And we continue to have great relationships and great partnerships with SpaceX and ULA.
In fact, just recently it was announced that for the future of national security space launch what we call Phase 2 competition was recently within the last two weeks announced that both SpaceX and ULA won contracts for phase two, so they will continue to be the nation's launch providers when it comes to national security space. But let's go ahead and build this slide because Vandenberg has been working with a number of other launch providers and if we could advance to fill in the second piece of this slide what you're going What you're going to see here is new rockets, new frames, new motors, new engines and a whole variety of commercial enterprises, commercial endeavors to bring different options to the commercial market where space lift is concerned.
And I can tell you, I've met with the CEOs of these companies. I've met with their boards and their technology directors and each one of these companies has exciting innovative new developments that they want to bring to the market. And it's fascinating because each one is a little different, targets at different niche part of the market. Perhaps different strategies in terms of how to launch where to launch different strategies in terms of how those spacecraft eventually get to their final orbits. Different strategies on how they're going to build the rocket, how they're going to fuel the rocket So more so than ever, we are seeing and this slide represents a lot of innovation that's pouring into the commercial industry right now where space launches concern.
Okay if we could advance to the next slide. So why Vandenberg? Why do I say that we have untapped potential? Well, first of all as many of you might suspect it is very important when you choose a launch site that you consider geography. And that's why here in the United States we primarily launch from the coast. Because depending on the orbit that you want to achieve, you really don't want to fly a rocket over a populated area. One of my primary responsibilities as the wing commander and the installation commander here at Vandenberg Is to make sure that we never blow up a rocket over the places where you live. We do not, public safety is my number one priority to ensure that whatever we however we conduct operations public safety is absolutely a premium So what does that mean?
It means geography is important. And when you're on the West Coast, where we are situated here at Vandenberg We have a straight shot to the south. And that's important because as you see in that first note, in that first bullet we are the nation's primary polar orbit launch site. So when you think about achieving an orbit where the satellite is going around the earth crossing over the poles, the North Pole and the South Pole To achieve that orbit, you have to launch due south. And it just so happens that at our little nook here in the Central Coast we have a shot directly south where we do not overfly land until we reach Antarctica. It's a very clean corridor, a very safe corridor and that's why we are premier site when it comes to achieving those polar orbits.
Additionally, as some of you know we have the nation's primary from a defense perspective, the nation's primary space control center. So we have here at Vandenberg Air Force Base what we call the CSFOC, the Combined Space Operations Center which is one of the premier nodes for all of the command and control that needs to occur across the Department of Defense enterprise when it comes to space And additionally, the U.S. Space Force utilizes a satellite control network and one of those major nodes is right here at Vandenberg called the Vandenberg Tracking Station. So Vandenberg is already a center of gravity when it comes to national security spaceflights When you look at what we have to offer, many acres of pre-disturbed land and we all can appreciate the importance of having pre-disturbed land.
As many of you know, we weren't always Vandenberg Air Force Base. We were once Camp Cook where our two artillery units trained prior to heading into war for World War II So we have acres and acres of pre-disturbed land, which is very ideal when you're talking about new development here in the Central Coast. Additionally, we have communication networks here that are more robust today than ever before and continually upgraded with new dark fiber available investments that we are making here on the base to be able to switch dark fiber through our own networks basically reach any point on the installation. And this is going to be key when we talk about bringing in commercial providers, commercial communication providers that would support a commercial space launch industry.
They're not going to want to run over the government's networks and we certainly don't need them over our government networks so establishing a commercial communication network is key and we're primed right now to do that. Of course, we have good access through major county state roads and highways. Access to rail the Union Pacific Railroad runs right through Vandenberg with a number of spurs potentially to support commercial space lift. And of course, we have a harbor where we have a boat dock and some of you know that one of our customers United Launch Alliance just recently Brought over major components of the Delta IV Heavy Booster, which is scheduled to launch later this year and that arrived right at our boat dock at the harbor here at Vandenberg.
And of course two major universities within one hour of commute and great relationships already that Vandenberg has with Cal Poly and UC Santa Barbara, and really the promise to just continually strengthen those relationships. There's a lot of potential here at Vandenberg Air Force Base. All right, let's advance to the next slide. So I talk about the perfect storm. And what I mean by that is, I'm often asked, you know, Carol Mastalia, why now? What's different? Some folks have told me, hey, I've been here for a long time. I've heard this before.
I heard about how space is going to bring in all this economic development. I was here when NASA was prominent and then folded up shop and abandoned us here in the Central Coast. So they tell me, I've heard this story before, what's different now? And I can tell you while it's not possible to predict the future, there are a number of very interesting points that we ought to consider.
One is that never before have we seen such an emphasis at the national level in policy, in doctrine, that really specifically identifies the need to embrace the commercial market We have learned and you all know that competition drives down price. If you have a competitive market, you're going to have providers that want to enter that market and they are going to want to provide services and products to beat out the competition. So when we look at the price point and we consider how much does it cost per pound to achieve orbit?
That commercial space industry is plays a decided factor in helping drive down that price for the American taxpayers. Second point on this slide, The United States Air Force and the United States Space Force is willing and able to grant extended use leases. And we have a history of doing that for our commercial providers, and for our national security space lift providers.
And we have the ability to grant those leases for an extended period of time. And we are willing to exercise that authority that we have here at Vandenberg to explore this potential. It just so happens that with General Jay Raymond, who is the Chief of Space Operations. Having having been now the CSO, the chief of space operations since December 20th and was most recently dual hatted as the commander of US Space Command, although he last week removed that hat and turned it over to the new U.S. Space Command Commander.
General Raymond maintains his role as the Chief of Space Operations, which is the four star in charge of the U.S. Space Force. His plan to build the range of the future has been launched and is in execution right now here at Vandenberg and at the Eastern Range at Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral. Building that range of the future is about modernizing the ranges and the facilities and the commodities and the infrastructure that we have available here. So, that work is already in progress. At the same time, we are exploring for this nation what does the spaceport of the future look like?
And that is a discussion that we're still early in the phases of that. Understanding exactly how a national spaceport, what does that governance structure look like? How should this nation organize for a national spaceport that would be open to all launch providers, commercial or otherwise. So these plans are in work at the same time if you look at that fourth bullet we're seeing significant venture capitalists private investment in the commercial space industry And that includes commercial space.
You'll recall the slide I showed with all of those new companies. Some of those companies are on Series A, Series B, Series C funding and the reason they're getting this funding is because they have these innovative ideas and investors are primed to capitalize on these innovations and try to bring them to market. So there's substantial private investment right now that we have not always seen before.
Then the next bullet talks about the substantial commercial space networks that are being deployed. And let me be clear on this, because what I want to convey to you is that whether you're looking at private industry, commercial industry or national security architectures What we're seeing is a shift toward what I call massively proliferated constellations of satellites.
Heretofore, we in the DoD and in the Intel community typically build very robust, very large, very complex satellites The new architectures are really leading us down a path where we're building smaller, cheaper more modular spacecraft but in huge quantities. So instead of a constellation of a dozen satellites you're seeing constellations of 200 300 500 satellites and in some of these markets and some of the commercial ventures You are seeing constellations of two, three thousand satellites. Now satellites need to get to orbit somehow. Which means that you're going to have an increase for launch demand. The increase in the demand for space lift is expected to climb and if for no other reason that these architectures, these constellations of hundreds or thousands of satellites to build these networks in space are gonna need a ride to orbit So we are bracing and I should say embracing that opportunity in preparing for the increase and launch.
And of course, we already have significant architecture here on Vandenberg over the years billions of dollars invested by the US government so we're not starting with a clean slate. We have significant infrastructure in place today And finally, we're seeing that with organizations like REACH, with organizations like GO-Biz out of the state of California who have expressed an interest in the economic development opportunities at Vandenberg. This is an opportunity, like I said a perfect storm to develop the partnerships that are necessary for commercial space.
Okay if we could go forward So what are some things specifically that we're currently working on here at Vandenberg? You can you can see in the cutout, some of our facilities. The SLCC is a space launch complex and this is on South Vandenberg and what you're seeing Opportunities that we have identified, areas on the base where based on the geography because geography is king here.
Based on the geography we feel would make an ideal location for a commercial provider and again you know predisturbed land is a key component. Geography is a key component and then existing infrastructure is a key component Another component is the environmental impacts. And as you know, we have a robust environmental team here at Vandenberg Air Force Base works very closely with the California Coastal Commission works very closely with US Fish and Wildlife and a number of other regulatory agencies.
And our team here is building an environmental assessment which will be an umbrella EA that would cover a family of small launch vehicles. So when you think about the environmental process and how you have to, if you are a new launch provider trying to make a mark for yourself in the commercial market And trying to bring those innovative ideas to the market, which the market desperately needs. Being able to have an organization like Vandenberg Air Force Base help you through that environmental process is critical.
We have years of experience doing this. We have the absolute best on our team who understand how we can launch satellites into space, how we can test missiles and still protect the environment. And we're putting our years of expertise to this particular effort so that we can better facilitate some of these smaller companies and help them navigate through the environmental requirements here in the Central Coast.
And then like I mentioned earlier, the second major bullet on this slide. We're continuing to make the investments here at Vandenberg that are necessary whether it's upgrading our communication networks, modifying our base access points and continuing to drive those infrastructure changes. The last bullet on this chart talks about SLCC-8 Space Launch Complex 8 This is a special project. Slickgate, you can see on the map, is just north of the boathouse, northwest of our boathouse here.
And Slickgate is under refurbishment. We laid new concrete pad. We're doing a number of other things to Slickgate. We own SlickGate. It's not currently leased to any commercial entity. And we believe that SLC-8 could be a potential incubator for new commercial companies that want to test out their new concepts. If you build a new rocket body or you're trying a new engine, or you have a different type of fuel and you want that very first launch Right where you have very little reliability data and you're not exactly sure what's going to happen.
And in some cases, some innovators will tell you let's fail fail fast and fail early so we can learn from those mistakes. Slick 8 is our perfect place For new companies to fail early and then learn from that and build that back into their production and build that information in that data back into their designs so that they can very quickly turn those new products and get to market with a reliable booster.
So we're really excited about the work that's ongoing at Slickgate and preparing that here as kind of an incubator of sorts for future companies. All right, let's go ahead and advance to the next slide. I mentioned a little bit about range of the future. And some of you might be asking, well what is range of the future? Quite frankly it's a way to increase capacity of the range.
We are preparing right now for what the future holds which we believe is a launch band unlike one that we have seen before. So if the launch schedule is going to grow, if we're going to have multiple users on our range, we need to increase the ops tempo. We need to be able to increase throughput increased capacity A big part of this is what we call autonomous flight safety system.
This is the idea that a booster is gonna have a black box, for lack of better analogy. A black box aboard with the algorithm that helps the booster understand where it is relative to the populated areas and critical infrastructure. And if necessary would autonomously self-destruct to prevent any damage to property or loss of life. So making our boosters safer, more autonomous is a big part of range of the future. But also developing an infrastructure where you have plug and play, where there's high speed internet, high definition optics, remote control operations, where companies that have different requirements Instead of trying to reconfigure the existing infrastructure to meet a proprietary waveform that a company may try to bring to the market, we would just provide the infrastructure where they could plug and play and utilize the high-speed communications to route their data wherever they need to.
So that's a really exciting part about range of the future. And it's really, if you think about going from point to point configuration and analog configuration to one that is more network centric this is kind of what we're trying to build here on the range. All right, if we go ahead to the next So all of the things that I've been talking about kind of manifest and culminate in this idea of a commercial space zone.
And this is where I think it becomes extremely germane to the members of the board and to anybody who is interested in potentially building a commercial center of gravity, a commercial hub here in the Central Coast for commercial space. And like I talked about, we have an abundance of land, a pre-disturbed land and we have identified one or two areas which would be perfect for a commercial space zone. So what would we build in the commercial space zone? Well, we, the government wouldn't build anything We would provide the land and the idea would be that private or state investor, at the State of California, private investors, VCs, others, private companies.
There'd be an opportunity where you could build potentially a commercial zone which would include anything from administrative offices The idea would be that we would have The area where whatever the requirements that commercial providers have, and remember what we've heard is that commercial providers really want to drive their investment toward the innovation that they're bringing to the market. So this is another opportunity to kind of alleviate some of those overhead costs. If you're a new launch provider and you need some admin spaces here in the local area, it's probably something that you might want to consider leasing before you build your own as you try to bring those innovations to the market and prove yourself.
So there's a lot of different opportunities here to build a commercial space zone. I would propose that we have it on Vandenberg, but it wouldn't necessarily have to be on Vandenberg. It could be in the local area. If it were on Vandenberg, I'd be willing to move our security fence lines and what we call the controlled perimeter in a way that the commercial zone would be easily accessible to those companies and they wouldn't actually have to process through the security requirements on Vandenberg. And then of course, when you talk about new construction, you're talking about the potential for all of the utilities and the services, the demand for utilities and services that are going to come with that and a lot of exciting potential there for economic development Okay, let's go to the next slide.
And at this point I would say if I were asked how does the county help us out in this? Really I wanted you just to be aware of kind of where the Space Force is headed I wanted you to be aware of the opportunities here and aware that we have a vested interest in doing what we can within the guidelines that were allowed to facilitate a commercial market. And I think we have Melissa James is also scheduled to speak with you today.
The effort that she and REACH have launched, we're proud to be part of that so I would say continue to support Melissa and then continue to engage with the commercial space industry One of the keys to this, if this is going to be successful it'll be actually answering the needs of these new companies. Understanding what their requirements are and what their obstacles are, what the hurdles are and then finding a way to mitigate those. If you want to attract new business to Vandenberg into the Central Coast we have to make it as easy as possible for those new enterprises to be successful So with that, I will cede my time back to you Chair Hart. I greatly appreciate this opportunity and look forward to working with all of you. Over.
0:52 – 1:088 turns
Well thank you very much Colonel Masler. That was really an impressive presentation. You covered a lot of territory and explained a dynamic industry in all of the ways that It's going to evolve with your leadership and our encouragement. And I really appreciate you taking time to be with us today. I know you're very busy, but this is an incredibly exciting opportunity for both Annenberg Air Force Base and the County of Santa Barbara and our local residents and economy. So thank you very much for being here today.
Are there questions for Colonel Masteler? Mr. Chair? Yes, Supervisor Lavinino?
I just want to tell you that, you know, I've been on the board 10 years and you're right. We have in the Santa Maria area we've kind of heard this before but the difference this time is we've never heard it From Vandenberg Air Force Base. It's always been a private company that has come to tell us that things are different, or it's a private consultant that's telling something is different. So to hear it actually from the horse's mouth, it's the breath of fresh air. I'm really excited and maybe this is a question from Melissa, I'm not sure but maybe you can just touch on this if you could just kind of touch for a minute on who are we competing against?
You know, what are they doing different than what we're doing? How far behind are we if you could just kind of give a lay of the land or the competition involved.
Sure I will comment from my perspective. One of the, there's a number of ranges that we're competing with. Again, I go back to my point that geography is important So when you talk about polar launches, of course Alaska has launch capacity and Vandenberg. And then when you're looking at what we call equatorial launches or companies that are interested in launching to the east, Wallops Island has a range there So one of the things that's interesting is we have already seen examples where because of the launch manifest, because of the demand On getting a slot on the range schedule at Patrick is pretty intense.
We have seen launch providers that have opted to pull out and come to Vandenberg if they can achieve their orbit from Vandenberg simply because they are able to launch when they want to, as opposed to getting squeezed out from the East Coast. You know, one of the challenges that my colleagues at Patrick Air Force Base have is weather. There are more launches that are canceled due to weather out at the east coast in Florida than there are here.
So we have good weather, we have good orbitology when it comes to specific orbits, good geography. What we don't have is a lot of investment. Florida, the state of Florida has invested hundreds of millions into the launch infrastructure at Cape Canaveral. And we have not seen that kind of investment before, which is why I am so excited to be a partner with the state of California and GO-Biz because those kinds of relationships are going to be important as we try to jumpstart some of this commercial space lift industry here on the West Coast.
And we continue to compete with some of those competitors that do have money pouring in from the state. But I am not as concerned, quite frankly about the competition where ranges are concerned because I think there's gonna be enough launch demand that all of the ranges are gonna have plenty of business. That would be my guess But I will defer to Melissa and others if there's more to add.
Thank you, Colonel Mausler. Any other questions from board members? All right then let's go to Ms. James.
Great, well thank you Colonel Mastelier and members of the board. I just really appreciate the opportunity to be here with you today. Colonel Mastelier thank you for your tremendous leadership. I can say that our state and our region are very fortunate to have you at the helm with your strong vision and active partnership with your team in the installation to really explore and implement some of the opportunities that you've detailed Supervisor Hart, members of the board. Good morning and thank you for allowing us the opportunity to speak with you today. My name is Melissa James and myself and Andrew Hackleman are here today as the leadership team behind REACH which is a regional economic action coalition serving the Central Coast region By way of background, REACH was established about a year and a half ago as an economic impact organization serving the Central Coast region from Vandenberg Air Force Base to Camp Roberts.
The organization was created by leaders from across the region that were deeply concerned about the closure of Diablo Canyon in Slope County to the north, So the organization was formed to change course for our economic future and improve the lives of Central Coast residents by creating more economic opportunity. And as we progress, the conversation has evolved and we have found ourselves digging into big challenges such as the impacts of COVID, as well as big opportunities such as the expansion of commercial space at Vandenberg Air Force Base which we've just talked about this morning.
All of these Challenges and opportunities have grown a wider conversation for partnership with all of Santa Barbara County. As we look at the next slide, just a quick overview of what we're hoping to speak with you about this morning is that our goal is to talk to you a little bit about our organization who we are, what we do, the challenges we face in our region To detail out at a high level what our REACH 2030 plan is as a 10-year strategy that has been developed over the last year, launched just last month designed to create economic resilience and diversity into our regional economy. And then we're going to explore a little bit of a conversation about deeper partnership with the County of Santa Barbara in our work including our initiative on Vandenberg Air Force Base.
So on the next slide, just to give you a high level of what we do who we are. So our mission what we do is to increase economic prosperity through big thinking bold action and regional collaboration. And why we do what we do is that our vision is that the Central Coast would be a place for current and future generations have the opportunity to thrive. If I were to put it simply, I would say that we believe the next generation should have the opportunity to build a life career in the future here on the Central Coast and that we believe we can achieve that by working together through a regional approach.
On the next slide, I'll just detail a little bit about how we do our work. How we achieve that vision and we do that through a model of regionalism which has been proven across the United States. We convene diverse stakeholders together to catalyze action to do together what we cannot do alone. A tangible example of this approach in action would be when REACH jumped in to support the rapid response and safe reopening of our economies and communities, in partnership with Santa Barbara County through the RISE Guide. That was an example of bringing together a diverse set of stakeholders from public health to the medical profession to a large cross-section of the community And as we
move on to the next slide, I'm just going to speak at a high level about some of the challenges that we face as a region and why this organization was formed to tackle those challenges. A quick look at the landscape we are facing before we entered the global pandemic of COVID-19 tells us that people across the Central Coast were struggling. We have two out of every three of our jobs paying less than $50,000 a year and these low wage jobs have been growing faster than any other income.
Before COVID one in every four Middle class residents said they did not have $500 in the case of an emergency and 53% of middle-class residents that they were likely to leave Central Coast. Before COVID, one in 10 residents said they were worried about having enough money for food. That number was doubled to one in every five of residents of the Latinx community across our region.
And before COVID, 86% of residents did not believe youth today would be able to afford a life on the Central Coast as adults. And finally, before COVID what was the longest economic expansion in our nation's history had one in every two of our jobs at a median wage $25,000 a year. And as we think about the impacts of COVID and we still don't know the second and third degree impacts on the economic well-being of our business Businesses, employees or their families. We know that people were struggling before and the situation has only gotten worse over 40% of all jobs under 40,000 have been lost and we're we all know that the unemployment hovering at 13% is some of the worst that we've seen in many decades.
So as we look at the next slide, just a quick timeline of how we got here over the last 18 months that the organization has been formed. In 2019 it was all about bringing together the region through an extensive process. We partnered with Deloitte to facilitate that and identifying what the challenges and opportunities would be. We kicked off our work with Vandenberg Air Force Base earlier this year through our commercial space launch initiative but I'll speak with you a little bit More and more detail about, and that work in the first year was really what we called a sprint to get to the marathon. Deep long term work to change the trajectory of our regional economy. And right as we were set to kind of pass the finish line of at least that initial sprint of detailing out the strategy and actions necessary, COVID hit.
And we entered into a new sprint and a new marathon related to the global pandemic and spent the better part of the last few months helping to support our communities in both counties and some of their relief and reopening work. And now we find ourselves I'm here back speaking about the economic opportunity and work ahead. And we are excited to be talking with you today about what a partnership may look like, a deeper partnership with Santa Barbara County.
So as we move into the next slide, what you're going to see here is just a way in which we look at the economy And the phases that we may be going through. In the time of COVID, we talk quite a lot about phases these days and I'm gonna speak with you just about three distinct phases. The first being relief and reopening. This has been the stage that we have been in as we have been working to get Business and relief to businesses and individuals through the economic shutdown. We've all obviously been working in close partnership on reopening, it's been a key priority as we've been dealing with the immediate crisis.
And now we're kind of straddling into conversations and perspective about recovery which is an important aspect of the next phases of our collective work as a region, as an economy and a community here on the Central Coast. The word recovery will be in our vocabulary likely for many months, maybe years to come and we'll be determining how we can continue to support business to operate in a very changing environment.
Still in the trial and error period as we look at kind of the social experiment of what it looks like to have an economy function with schools and a distance learning mode. And so there's still a lot that we're all learning together, and how we can continue to support our businesses and individuals. The third phase is what we are calling reinvention and resilience, and this is going to be the place in which we're going to be camping for the remainder of the discussion. It's about how we as a region need to be focusing on reinventing our economy and finding new ways to support our businesses and residents to diversify and fortify our economy to withstand future economic shocks.
So as you kind of look at this, we break it up into the immediate needs of today and then the long term needs over the next several years to come. So
moving to the next slide, we're going to talk with you just a little bit about our REACH 2030 plan which really is that reinvention and resilience work for our regional economy. The plan came together with input from over 1,000 residents, 200 leaders. And we believe that we have a good running start on the Central Coast for what it looks like to build upon the region's strengths and focus on creating greater resiliency economic opportunity across the Central Coast region. This is a 10-year action plan, and at the top level, the goal is to create 15,000 good paying jobs by 2030.
A good paying job as we've defined it is one paying 50,000 and above bolstering many middle and high wage jobs. Just to put that into context, the state of California has a goal of having one good paying job in every household In our region, we currently have about one good-paying job in every three households. So our goal is to do work over time to shift our jobs mix so that we are much more in par with that state goal of having a good paying job in every household. And just to put that number, the 15,000 jobs by 2030 into context, it's about $1 billion in payroll which is equivalent About five times the payroll of Diablo Canyon.
So just to give you kind of some context, so with that we're going to
move on to the next slide and we're going to just detail out at a high level what the initiatives are within our REACH 2030 plan and to do that I'm gonna turn it over to Andrew Hackleman to walk through that with you.
1:08 – 1:271 turns
Thanks very much, Melissa. Chair Hart and Supervisors Andrew Hackman from REACH. It's a pleasure to be before you today and it's great opportunity like Colonel Nassler said to share with you some of the things that we think are opportunities for the future. He put into this economic development strategy we're calling REACH 2030 This plan, we think is a little bit different approach than we may have seen previously here on the Central Coast. But of course, the regional approach and way of doing business is something that's been proved across the United States.
Our plan isn't only focused on business support but on multiple dimensions integrated over time. And we think that this is critical to achieving economic vitality We have four priorities, or as I like to call them lines of effort and we have six initiatives within those. And it starts with what one might expect with industries focusing on industries that we think are have high potential and proven potential to grow and they're the type of high tech sustainable jobs that we want to see on the central coast and in our California economy So we know that our economy, as Melissa discussed is saturated with low wage jobs. But we have these existing high value, high productivity tradable sectors, these industries that can create good paying jobs for residents in Santa Barbara County.
Industries such as Agritech, aerospace and defense advanced manufacturing and clean technology and just technology sectors more broadly. They offer tremendous proven opportunity for growth in our region And that opportunity remains, even in a COVID world where we can foster by supporting startups expansion and attraction. These industries remain strong despite all the challenges that our nation faces and our state face in this economic downturn that's being caused by the pandemic. These industries are high growth in our region, the state and the nation We have a number of key strategic assets here on the Central Coast that we're just blessed to have, and existing business ecosystems that are ripe for development and expansion in these areas.
And again they create these high-paying jobs that are sustainable in our region and will help protect us against economic shocks in the future. The second priority is we have some really remarkable geographic assets. Diablo Canyon of course we're approaching four years and as a region even though it is in San Luis Obispo County, it's part of the economy in North Santa Barbara County as well. And we're approaching four years since the natural closure of that power plant.
It offers a tremendous opportunity for the region economically over the long over the long period. And we have opportunities to do lots of conservation of lands in that area as well, on the order of well over 10,000 acres. At any rate this is a world-class asset that our region can develop into hub of innovation just for job creation in existing high value industries like clean technology water resilience and things of that nature.
The other asset is Vandenberg. It's difficult to overstate the importance both for our state and our region, but also for the nation that this asset has. And we aim to create with our partners at the state and Santa Barbara County and the Space Force a thriving space port to meet future demand for commercial and defense enterprise systems. So just so everyone's aware, the space industry globally right now is about $425 billion. But over the next few decades it's forecast to grow to $2.7 trillion, nearly $3 trillion this industry and that speaks to the demand that Colonel Masteler was describing in response to the question that Supervisor Labanino asked him.
We'll dive into more detail on this in a moment. But priority three, this is kind of long range thinking but things that we have to think about now if we want to see our future the way that we'd like it to be and that means investing in infrastructure and housing for our workforce and our transportation networks. Things that really require attention now and over the long term to ensure that as We need to make sure that as our communities do grow and as we do shape our future, that we're doing so without causing unnecessary or unacceptable impacts to our environment or to our quality of life. These things can't be solved either at an individual level.
And we believe that multiple counties advocating for funding and for priorities related to infrastructure and transportation is better than us just doing it alone, either as cities or individual counties. The fourth priority that we have is fourth, but it's certainly not last. And it's about investing in our residents, investing in the people who live here so that our goal is not to try to attract people from outside of our region. We want to focus on ensuring that our workforce has the opportunity to grab additional rungs on the economic ladder and that they have the training and education to do so.
We have a lot to do to foster the creation of good paying jobs in our region and create the conditions for these jobs. And we really need to put focus on our residents and their education opportunities to do this, and we are proud to say that we have higher education partnerships that are helping us to integrate these opportunities. So on the next slide as we look ahead, we want to talk now a little bit about how It's been really productive to partner with Santa Barbara County and some of the very specific things that we're doing. And the next slide here starts to describe what that could look like.
So, of course through our region and our strategic process and our work with Santa Barbara County on the Rise Guide, we've seen some really great synergy for expanded partnership with your county in a few key areas Not only benefit to the entire county but, but to the residents and the people that are working within the county. And kind of more broadly to our region. One opportunity for partnership is within strategy and planning it includes a comprehensive economic development strategy.
So this is basically building upon the work of REACH 2030 and gaining investment from the Economic Development I'm going to talk a little bit about the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors administration funding to create what is called a seds and that regional document focused on Santa Barbara County. Individually, but also in the context of a larger regional umbrella has strong potential for drawing down investment from federal and state sources not only We're going to bring in funding for efforts that.
There's the other opportunity that we see here is, you know, the economic element of the general plan. That there's a natural segue into the economic element which allows for deep engagement with key stakeholders in Santa Barbara County but it also allows the opportunity for the county government to institutionalize and integrate some thinking about how the county would like to pursue economic vitality and it gives a great decision tool for your board as well.
The second opportunity is fostering job growth in key industries. This is kind of bread and butter economic development, but put on kind of a strategic level where we see these industries having the ability to foster greater resilience and diversity in our regional economy. We have tremendous assets that at a regional level mapping together make us very competitive for seeing growth across Santa Barbara County In logistics, human talent, et cetera.
And the two-county approach in this two county picture just makes us stronger and being able to retain the talent we have and to be able to expand the types of businesses and high tech industries that are sustainable and pay high wages. And third is developing a commercial space enterprise at Vandenberg and on the Central Coast. So it's not just about the base itself for sure, it's about attracting and retaining and growing this industry, this high-tech industry here in the state of California and on the Central Coast. You've heard a lot about that from Colonel Mats DeLaire but on the next slide here, this particular initiative is important because we've realized a few things that we do have this market opportunity here. We have this opportunity because Vandenberg has the Western Range as Colonel Mastolero was describing, you know it can act at the center of gravity to draw not only additional military missions but also commercial activity and partnership that our residents and our local governments can benefit greatly from.
And Vandenberg is something that just can't be overemphasized as a strategic tool to help us do that. And so what we've embarked on is an initiative to develop a strategic plan that first takes a look at economic impact in the county, kind of baselining what impact Vandenberg has And then overlaying that with a very robust and detailed market analysis that envisions a multi-decade future state where we can overlay and project what type of impacts our decisions can have on expanding the commercial space enterprise, and use that as a tool to bring in additional investment. And we're already seeing some of these activities And I think it's a great opportunity to really bear some fruit with, you know, congressman salute Carville Hall adding language into the NDA recently for some federal dollars that are going to state commercial space launch industry.
One of our partners who has a business on the Central Coast and a larger company in Florida received a contract from the federal government for some space launch activities. And that money is going right here back to the Central Coast because we have, you know, world-class advanced manufacturing activities on the Central Coast that can meet those types of demands.
And then more largely, all of this will fit under the umbrella of a master plan and similar to or in the spirit of what you would see at Cape Canaveral or Space Florida that is a comprehensive and multi-decade vision for what this industry and activity looks like including understanding And addressing impacts on on workforce development, housing energy transportation and all of those things. And so that's the that's the importance of taking a strategic long term look at having a plan to do so on the next slide.
We know that the master plan is critically important, you know. And one of the things that Colonel Mastler was asked and something that I think we can add color to here in this slide that Supervisor Laramino was getting at is what's our competition? Well our competition is And we have the opportunity here at Vandenberg through this master plan to really address the deficits that we're seeing. So, we haven't seen the same type of state investment but we also don't have the same organization amongst our key partners and that's why we put together our MOU with key partners like Colonel Nastler at the 30th Space Wing, the Director of the Governor's Office for Business and Economic Development So I'm going to turn it over to my colleague.
So and as you know, we did recently announce this MOU partnership and just discuss those partners. And we think that having this integrated effort and with everyone understanding and agreeing on the same priorities that it is in fact what successful spaceports and ranges have done like Cape Canaveral. So why is the space industry important? You know on the next slide here, you know we strongly believe as the state of California does that California has been a leader in innovation really on the frontier of space and aerospace since its inception.
But that competition and businesses leaving California is happening at a rate that we don't want to see as leaders in these industries. California has always been at the forefront of creating and making and doing these really challenging things. And we have an opportunity now to double down on that leadership role. And that's exactly what the GO-Biz office is has pulled up a seat to do it in part with our region. So with this large and growing industry over the next few decades, we see this as a key opportunity not only for the Central Coast but the state of California As an example, earlier this month at that announced the MOU announcement.
We hosted a community event and we showcased a few partnerships and one of them was being joined by senior vice president of Relativity. They're growing startup space company. They do 3D printing of rockets and at this press event they described the partnership that they have with Vandenberg and investment It's just one of the things that we believe strongly that we're going to see over the coming years as Thank you very much.
And so the next frontier and the opportunity that we see before us has a lot to do with space on the Central Coast. But really from our perspective our mission and our vision as you heard from Melissa at the beginning of this conversation it's about jobs high tech jobs in the future that are sustainable Increasing individual resident quality of life, providing additional rungs on the economic ladder to help people have the opportunity to make better lives for themselves and their families here in the Central Coast. And the last slide that we have here is just to talk to you high level about our timeline We discussed the MOU signing. We have already produced phase zero of this plan, which kind of details our key infrastructure challenges and priorities as well as a preliminary market analysis on what opportunities we have here on the Central Coast to really grow our commercial space industry.
We have phases one and two in an expanded scope of this master plan with our partnership that we form. And then related but not part of the Vandenberg commercial space effort that we have underway is, you know, the nomination that you likely heard of for the permanent basing We have a real shot here on the Central Coast because of the leadership in the local community, our business organizations.
And our partners at the 30th Space Wing supporting our efforts to really have a good bid for conveying to the Air Force why the Central Coast and why Vandenberg is the best place to put this four-star headquarters. lay down the importance of having a four-star General's headquarters here on the Central Coast. It will bring other opportunities and it gives us really a strong foothold here on the Central Coast for a really great push into the commercial space enterprise as well. And so, as I conclude here today, I want to thank you for the opportunity to speak with you and turn back over to my colleague Melissa. Thank you.
1:27 – 1:337 turns
Thanks, Andrew and thank you to the members of the board. I'll just close today by saying that the work that we do is shaped by those who participate in it and we are inviting deeper participation from your board and the County of Santa Barbara and we look forward to working with you into the future. Thank you so much.
Thank you very much Ms. James and Mr. Hackleman for your presentation, you've been working very hard for a long time putting this information together and working collaboratively with a lot of organizations and it really seems to be getting traction and moving forward in a positive direction. Other comments or questions from board members? Supervisor Williams and then Supervisor Harmon.
Well, I definitely believe it is crucial to have some strategic direction and to have multiple strategic directions to address what I view as the fundamental economic problem of our community. We're going to talk a little bit about what we've been doing in the last couple of weeks. I want to start by talking about the housing situation which they highlighted well with shocking figures, you know, I I track our median income but that that over 50% are job of our jobs or what under $26,000 dollars a year is listening because it means that we are such a low-wage economy in comparison with the cost of living, that our de facto poverty is overwhelming.
And so I just want to appreciate those efforts to have a strategic direction. You know, Melissa and Andrew have been very articulate in this message. Not only that they have excellent recommendations for science fiction and fantasy. So if you need an additional bit of skills that they can provide the name of the wind is really good. So thank you. Supervisor Hartman?
Thank you. I think the county has been wrestling for some time with what is our role in economic development strategy, and when I came on the board we gave some money to various chambers and asked them to work on it. They may not be the entity to do it. I know there's the North County Econ Alliance that's working very hard support various targeted industries in our county. We actually, as a board before Chair Hart came on board did dedicate a little money to develop an economic development strategy vitality strategy like Ventura and Sloan counties have done but it's really a conundrum what role does government play in designing an economic strategy for the private sector and universities? And so I knew, or was introduced to REACH when they were Hourglass.
It's a very interesting structure. They have a very small organization, Melissa and Andrew, and then they have a board, and then they work with Deloitte, one of the top firms in the nation in the world, to do a lot of the technical support. So they have been working how to deal with Diablo North County, I believe now they're looking at our full county. I think that's important. I think UCSB has tremendous assets. I think what we see in South County, we'd like to see a little more of those jobs up in North County. So one county, one future, I believe they've taken that to heart and now they're looking at both SLO and Santa Barbara County.
I really wanted to call out Colonel Mascolier, I've dealt with many different commanders at the Air Force Base. They don't stay for long and they've got huge responsibilities and they're mostly internal looking. And he has been extraordinary in reaching out and creating partnerships throughout California and our region so I'm very appreciative of the work that REACH has done working together And I think it's really worth an investment. It's a hypothesis, can this work? We don't really know but they're bringing a lot of different partners and resources together that we can't do as a county. And I think the question before us is, do we want to support this effort?
There's no guarantee, but I strongly encourage us to support it because I think it's a really interesting strategy. And I think a silver lining is that they've developed the rise guide, they've learned about all the businesses that we have so they kind of worked at the strategic conceptual level and then they've been really in the trenches Learning about our businesses and the various issues that COVID has presented.
There is one thing that I continue to struggle with, and that is we're working at a conceptual level. How do we begin also to be working more bottom up? And one of the issues with private space launches is what do they need from local government? What do they need from the City of Lompoc or the County of Santa Barbara, or Santa Maria, or our various other communities.
It turns out that most of the manufacturing is done in LA, that area. They probably don't need manufacturing ability here. People come, they stay for a while, they go again. So I'm really eager To see if there's any ability while we work strategically and we work big picture, whether there are anythings that fall out that are specific. That we can start working on and not compromise a larger vision. So I think that's about all I have to say thank you.
Thank you Supervisor Hartman. Any other questions for staff or comments? We have one speaker from public.
Chair Hart members of the board yes we have one request to speak and that is Andy Caldwell.
Okay, if there are not questions from board members we'll go to public comment now.
1:34 – 1:395 turns
Chairman Hart, Members of the Board, Andy Caldwell representing COLAB. To be blunt We actually started an effort like this 30 years ago and we ran into a couple of hurdles, that is economic development and maintaining preserving our economy. And those two hurdles were in the form of the Air Pollution Control District and the Resource Management Department as they were known back then.
Here's the issue. We believe that REACH has done a phenomenal job leading this effort. The research that they've showed you is stunning and staggering, and that's great. However, here is where the rubber is going to meet the road or the irresistible force meets the immovable object. The Colonel and I am too grateful that we have finally a leader at the base that really seems to want this but I also believe that because of what President Trump has done The question is, if he ropes off a portion of Vanderburg Air Force Base, moves the fence so to speak, so that a commercial space campus can be built there.
Who permits it? Because I could tell you right now we've been doing this for 30 years. You guys will kill it in a heartbeat The question is if it's on Vandenberg Air Force Base but its private sector will the county the APCD Planning and Development Department at all. And the Coastal Commission at all strangle this baby in the womb folks There have been so many different projects that could have served as a boom to our economy, but they died. They died because your overall policies goals and values don't align with economic development. The other thing and this gets to a real big complaint that we have is this shoe doesn't necessarily fit our local populace We have a huge number of people that are not enrolled in STEM courses.
And so this is going to take a wholesale shift in education, culture and society so that we can keep these jobs local. Lompoc needs the tax revenue. We wish that they could be involved in this. And the other thing is unfortunately the REACH plan doesn't deal with oil and gas and mining or regular production agriculture And finally, we wish that we could keep Diablo.
Even Governor Newsom now is saying he doesn't want to lose the oil and gas projects because of these rolling blackouts. We can't afford to lose Diablo so we would like to say all of the above in accordance with what REACH has prescribed but please answer the question who will do the permitting for this project? To know whether we put any more hope in this plan. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Caldwell. Matter is back to the board. Any other questions or comments? Thank you Ms. Anderson for your presentation. Thank you Colonel Mastler and Ms. James and Mr. Hackelman. You've been very provocative with your comments and there are a lot of questions to be answered but this is a great opportunity and I think it's an opportunity for the Board of Supervisors to draft a letter in support The efforts that were described I think it'd be nice for us to go on record and be able to demonstrate that support To our state and federal representatives. I know the governor's go business Folks would appreciate having that kind of local support on record for their potential engagement And if we could make that part of the motion We'll draft something Would anybody like to make a motion
Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion that we go ahead and move recommendations A, B, and C. And also as part of that to formulate a letter of support for reach in for Vandenberg the one you discussed.
Thank you Supervisor Lavenino is there a second?
I'll second and I just have a question if we're having further discussion. Yes, and that is the MOU and is there Would there be any interest in having the county sign on to that
1:39 – 1:4816 turns
Chair Hart and Supervisors, I don't know if Ms. James is still on the line but I think that's pretty much a done deal at this point. I think we can definitely author letters of support for it. This has been a long way in the making and I wouldn't want us to be holding it up anyway.
Okay we have a motion and a second. If there is no more discussion...
Supervisor Hart?
Yes
I just wanted to chime in there. I think it's an, um, I appreciate the recommendation and I think that it's something that we can certainly take back to the MOU signatories to see if they could be amended and come back to you with that.
Thank you Miss James. Appreciate your flexibility. Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll?
Ms Hartman? Aye Mr Adam?
Aye
Aye.
Mr. Williams?
Aye.
Chair Hart?
Aye.
Motion passes unanimously.
Thank you everyone let's take a brief five-minute break and then we'll come back for the next item which is number two Good morning, everyone. you We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting and
the next item is Department Item number two. Would the clerk please read that item into the record?
1:48 – 2:0315 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board, departmental item number 2 is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update. Dr.
DeRionne Ramosa welcome.
Good morning My briefing topics this morning, I'll be giving you a snapshot of the countywide data. Briefly going over our status on the CDPH monitoring data dashboard, briefly going over our progress with school waivers and then concluding with our current outreach efforts in North County. This graph shows that, as of yesterday, we have 7800 total cases. We have, as of yesterday, 7800 total cases over the last two weeks. The total number of cases has increased by 11.5%.
And the number of active cases has decreased by 24%. I'm going to pause for a second. I have something in my throat.
Can we get you a glass of water?
It's going to be awkward talking while I have a cough drop in my mouth, but I'm not sick. It's allergies.
Those happen even with the pandemic.
This graph describes the new cases in the past two weeks city by city so over the past two weeks the trend we are still seeing a decreased trend in Santa Maria, Santa Barbara and in Lompoc The IV and Goleta are still seeing a moderate increase. This graph describes the hospitalization of COVID positive in our county over the past two weeks, hospitalization rates have decreased by 36%.
Med surge rates are decreasing by 34% And ICU rates are, we're still seeing a continued decrease at 39%. This chart describes our status on the state data monitoring dashboard. We are at the, with regards to the number of tests per day we are at 227. So that metric we are surpassing so we are good with regards to the number of tests being conducted in our county.
Our case rate, we are continuing to see a decrease And at 138, however that still exceeds the expectation from this state. Testing positivity again we are seeing a decrease and it is at 7%, so just right under the threshold of 8%. Hospitalization as I previously mentioned, we are seeing a decrease, A negative 8%, so that is good. We continue to demonstrate that we have hospital capacity in our county with 49.5%.
of our ICU beds available and 67.9% of our ventilators available. As you recall, a county is flagged for elevated disease transmission criteria if our case rate exceeds 100 or our case rate is higher than 25 and our testing is higher than 8%. So we still have work to do at least with the case rate These are trends from the state, and as you can see in California we are seeing about a rough 8%, and in Santa Barbara we are seeing a decrease of 4%.
And 150 is the dotted line is where we need to be above. So we are still well above the state's expectation, but there's some fluctuations there. This graph describes our average case rate 14 days average case rate and we are reflective of California. California saw a decrease of roughly 13% and we are seeing a decrease of 14%. And again, we'd like to get below the 100 dash line and ultimately below the 25 cases per 100,000.
This trend graph describes our seven day testing positivity rate. The dash line is the 8% and we are trending downwards. So that last week, I shared that because we are trending downwards with our case rate. We are, we accepted. We began accepting school waivers last Friday. So I'd like to share with you that the team leads spearheading our efforts by being liaisons to the school districts led by Susan Klein-Flothschild and Peggy Dodds and both have, both are public health or I should say retirees from the Public Health Department We sent communication to all the school districts last Friday in a letter detailing the process, as well as including in that letter testing resources.
Attached to that communication was the application. Slated this Friday for all of the school's superintendents and their HR staff. And happy to report that all the school districts have responded. We are also creating a training for private schools, and that is to be slated on September 2nd. With regards to testing support, I checked and we have capacity in our county, in particular at the OptumServe sites.
We are seeing a availability consistently of 100 slots a day, so that is available to all of the school districts. As we stated in the letter, OptumServe is state sponsored and is available to all of the school districts and The public health department also has three sites, and we have allotted two hours a day for testing at our own sites. And these are really good initial approaches while the school work on a broader testing strategy. And we have offered to provide technical assistance for the schools.
We are looking at various options for the school to explore, something ranging from us expanding our county sites to a Saturday, to the school hiring their own swappers and Contracting with commercial labs to process those swabs to a variety of menu items. Because each school district is unique, and so they will have a selection to see what best fits for their needs.
So that's the testing support. So this is just really briefly, this is just a glimpse at the waiver application that we ask for. The basic information whether what type of school is applying, the number of students enrolled per class. And we ask for, this is basically a state form that we pre-read up. It asks for the labor organization that's been consulted, the parent and community organizations that have been consulted.
And we asked for cleaning disinfection plan, their plan for cohorting. Their plan for movement throughout the school day face covering and other essential protective gear availability health screening plans practices to safeguard healthy hygiene. Identification and tracing of contacts, the capacity to physical distance. And staff and family education testing triggers for switching to distance learning communication plans to all stakeholders.
And we have set up infrastructure within the Public Health Department to process these waivers, beginning with technical assistance from Susan and Dr. Dodds. And internally, we have a group of six people who will be reviewing the applications and providing technical assistance as the schools go through this process. I'd like to highlight outreach efforts that we are continuing in Santa Maria.
We are continuing to work with community-based organizations and other agencies, in particular with FSA, CHC, the City of Santa Maria and the Strawberry Commission. Over the past several weeks, met with key stakeholders to evaluate the ongoing needs and determine what else can we maximize, what other efforts can we leverage. And so out from those conversations We are continuing to partner with the Latinx Indigenous Migrant Task Force. We will continue to expand the groundwork of community health centers and FSA. In particular, we would like to really applaud CHC and FSA for their steadfast commitment and partnership with the Public Health Department and the county. CHC has done some pretty innovative work reaching out and partnering with the food bank, so as families are in line CHC is there to provide health education, to provide health kits that contain health education materials and other supplies.
FSA has multiple contracts with the Public Health Department for contact tracing. They will be our new partner with our home housing for the Harvest Project as well as other efforts. We will continue to amplify the trusted community members and using the CBOs and existing relationships We are providing additional funding for outreach material, radio spots, PSAs, face coverings, hygiene kits and sand sanitizers.
And with that I conclude my update.
Thank you Dr. Duranessa. Are there questions for Dr. Duranessa? Supervisor Hartman.
Yes, I had several. Let me start with What do we know about transmission by children, asymptomatic transition? I see lots of different things in the newspapers and I just wondered if it's settled or if it's still a big question mark right now.
I think there's a big question mark. There's been several studies that show that children do have the presence of the virus. They may be asymptomatic. The big question is Are they the silent spreaders? So there are several studies that we have reviewed and have not made any conclusion.
And then as far as schools opening up and then having to convert to remote learning, are those threshold criteria set by the school or the county or the state? The threshold for them to
reopen.
To have to close again if they have a certain number of cases.
So it is guided by the state. OK.
And flu season's coming up, and I hear a lot of discussion that it's hard to distinguish the COVID from the flu. And we're strongly encouraging people to get flu shots. When does that start?
2:03 – 2:1218 turns
Our flu clinics will start in October, and we have been in partnership with various community partners to work at. It is a worry for us the dual pandemic if you If you will, so we are beginning the work of planning our mass vaccination clinics doing more than what we've done in previous years. And in addition to that, And partnering up again throughout the county to make sure that community members who in particular, who are vulnerable. And in particular, who may not typically have access do get the access to those vaccines.
Good, and
I just had a couple of questions to finish here. Dr. Seifert in the San Ynez Valley has been corresponding with me and he's very appreciative for the role that public health is playing in helping the schools adjust and plan for testing and contact tracing. He was curious, and I'll just put this out there, whether it might be possible to have mobile testing or at the very least whether there could be time slots for different faculty in administration from different schools reserved and that would make it perhaps more efficient for them. So I put that out there for your consideration.
We are excited about the possibility of Utilizing our built-in site in particular because of the 100 roughly slots available on a daily basis. I don't know if you recall, we have to maintain a certain level of testing at each of our sites otherwise the state will retract that so We're going to look at the different testing sites and the possibility of doing just that. So we're in the exploration stage right now.
Supervisor Williams?
Well, so just because for the benefit Now go over where are all our testing sites. The county has just unveiled its own three testing sites, we still have some state sponsored testing can you just review that to make sure people
have this
in their head?
Sure so the OptumServe are state sponsored testing sites and they are in Santa Maria, And concluding at Earl Warren, starting in September we will be moving the Earl Warren site to Goleta. Those three sites are the state sponsored. In addition to those three sites, the public health department have our testing sites in Santa Maria, in the parking lot of our health center in Lompoc and here in Santa Barbara.
And where's the Santa Barbara location?
It is anchored by our, it's in the parking lot. Anchored by our health center and right by the EU in a trailer and there's clear marking and parking spots.
And so folks from these schools when can they start making appointments or visiting the sites?
They all sites are available for appointments
great.
And the questions for doctor don't
yeah, I mean just a future thing and I urge you to think about think about it is that that obviously the The problem that many have feared is that we could have a difficult flu season. I don't think it's completely known whether COVID is more virulent during flu season, but obviously in most of the United States people spend more time indoors which seems to, by all the research I've seen be more dangerous in many ways or at least promulgate transmission during the winter months. And so you know what's sort of your Your deadline for the preparations that you're making in the event of a resurgence during the flu season of COVID.
The preparation, so our department operations center It has been stood up since March and we are fully activated. In addition to that, we have formed units, our COVID-19 unit during flu season. That's our bread and butter annually where it's a process every year for the past 10, 15 years We've done this. We have existing partners in the community, healthcare providers as well as community-based organizations. I think the goal for us and I want to say that all of our partners realize the urgency and the critical need for us to get out that message and make sure that the flu vaccination is available.
That's convenient around the clock. CDC guidelines have said, but do the planning right now, but don't start the ideal time to start your flu clinics is really in October because of that six months wing. And so we are ready and we've been doing planning since last month and we've assembled a team. So I'm confident that we'll be ready to address the needs as they come.
And it's obviously from improving numbers that your targeted outreach towards the demographics in our community that were most vulnerable and had more transmission has made great progress. So I want to encourage you on that, but particularly encourage you and your staff For this action on on the schools. I mean last week, you know school superintendents were calling me and going, you know, this is this is great that we could apply for a waiver but there's just no way we can accomplish this safely without adequate test resources And you know, so the call went out and the county really answered that call.
You are providing by my calculation enough space to do several thousand tests a month for our schools and that won't quite reach capacity but if you continue to work with them on other options to supplement that then they could reach that capacity And I think it's also just incredibly helpful to these schools to be able to go to our testing sites because they are in a very strange situation where they're obligated to pay for testing that they're requiring for their employees.
And that's something that wouldn't normally with it be budgeted and available. And so I just think that it is a real great example of the county family going into action in a space of a few days and coming up with a solution that allows our schools to Test and open in a more safe manner. I want to thank you on behalf of our schools for that because I'm sure, I hope you're hearing that but that's definitely what I'm hearing from our local schools.
And this is really, we are responsive to our community. Whether it be a skilled nursing facility, whether it be the jail or in this case schools and I think it was a great move to have Susan and Dr. Dodds be our liaison to the school and improve the communication there.
2:12 – 2:176 turns
Thank you. Are there any other questions for staff? We have one speaker slip so let's go to public comment now.
Chair Hart, members of the board yes we have one request to speak and that's Andy Caldwell.
Chair Hart, members of the board before I
comment on this During that last one and a half hour presentation, I was the only speaker. I had one question that completely got ignored. I want to remind you these are public hearings and you've invited the public to participate and we'd like to be treated with some measure of respect in addition to being the head of CoLab. I also have the only radio show covering from Ventura to Paso Robles every day and I report on what happens in these meetings so these questions Are important to the entire Central Coast. With regard to the issue before you right now we wish that this outreach to the indigenous people could have happened three months ago as it turns out it looks like we may be behind the curve in doing that.
Number two we have a question on the form they asked for whether the unions have been advised is that the same thing has the union have the school union signed off There's some jurisdictions in the United States, including Los Angeles that are saying they, the teachers unions will not return to work even if the schools apply for the waivers. Number three relates to the first point, i.e., the indigenous population we were a couple of months too late last week I asked you to what degree are you ready for IV to explode? You've already had a 225% increase And schools not even back in session and all the kids aren't even back.
Are you going to be monitoring? Do you have a robust plan to monitor the party situation and even the living conditions in IV because we believe what happened in Santa Maria had to do with high density housing or dense living situations, not necessarily work situations. The reason IV is so important to us is even if those kids are asymptomatic, which is what we're expecting.
Because the state of California makes no distinction between asymptomatic and mild cases versus hospitalizations and death. What happens on IV is not going to stay in IV. It could actually set us back to stage one for crying out loud. So we're hoping this is the second week I've asked you this question Does your staff have a robust plan to deal with the party situation and the living situations in Isla Vista? Because congregate care setting, dense housing, dense prison populations.
Density, density, density is the primary method and means in place where COVID spreads. And so again we don't want to be a victim of poor leadership Nobody blamed us going on early because this is all new to us. But now we've got six months behind us and there's no excuse to not manage this ahead of time. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Caldwell. That concludes public comment. Any other discussion from the board? Supervisor Williams.
Well, I would just indicate that I would think that it would be a virtue if politicians don't always grab the mic and Andy answering your questions about what the permitting process would be for a launch facility outside the base I think the fact that we didn't want to give you a half-baked But I do think that the department, I've seen the department and I'm sure the third district has seen the department work even more closely on questions of Isla Vista which my understanding isn't just about students but is other houseless residents and other potentials for outbreak.
And so I know that you guys are, that both Supervisor Hartman and the department have been working on this. But wanted to say this is not something that either the supervisor's offices or the department is blind to and is definitely preparing for as far as I've seen.
2:17 – 2:2119 turns
Supervisor Hartman.
Well I just wanted to add, I spoke with the Chancellor yesterday we have meetings this week we've been working on this for months now it is a very serious concern at universities and colleges across the country And we are trying to review all the tools that we have collectively at our disposal. And I share the view that what happens in one part of our county affects the entire county, and we have to make sure that everybody understands that we're depending on each other to get through this. Thank you.
Thank you, Supervisor Hartman for your leadership on that subject. And I think it's fair to say that- Mr Chair? Yes, Supervisor Lavenino. Sorry, go ahead.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt
you. No, but let's go right ahead.
I was just going to remind folks that there was a time when Santa Maria and probably still is although our numbers are drastically reducing we've been the leader in cases since the beginning of this thing. And so, I for one am gonna be a little bit patient with other jurisdictions that are struggling with this as well and as they come into this. It does affect the county as a whole.
We also have to remember that South County's been in a lot of their businesses has been put on hold not because of any outbreaks that they had in their own cities but because we as one county were struggling with this as a county and I also agree that we need as much outreach as we can get in IV. And I know Supervisor Hartman's working on that, as well as our public health officials are struggling with that as well. But singling out individual areas is not the best way to deal with this as a public health crisis.
South County was patient and I think Santa Maria is now under control or at least doing considerably better. And so we got to express some of the same patience that others had with us.
Thank you very much for those comments, Supervisor Levin. You know, I think that's a really important point and one thing- Mr. Chair? Yes, Supervisor Adam.
If I could, I just wanted to bring up the Lompoc prison experience and to quote Ms. Miyasato, one county one future.
Yes, and I just think it's important to clarify for Mr. Caldwell probably that the outreach efforts that Dr. Doronoso specifically outlined in her presentation to Santa Maria are things that have been going on for quite some time and have evolved and gotten better Collaborative and included more partners as the challenge increased, and the lessons learned from that outreach effort will be applied absolutely in Isla Vista too. And so this isn't like we're starting from zero. We're expanding and getting better as time is going on, and it's becoming more effective as time is coming along. So I think that concludes this item. Would somebody like to make a motion?
I would make the motion for staff recommendation just with the augmentation that we direct the Public Health Department to continue to work with our local school districts and superintendents on the menu of options of how they could fulfill their testing capacity.
We have a motion, is there a second? Second. Motion's been made and seconded, any discussion? Let's have a roll call.
Miss Hartman. Hi, Mr. Adam.
Hi
Mr. Lavagnino.
Hi
Mr. Williams. I chair heart.
I
motion passes unanimously
and I think we still we have time to get item department item number 3 in before we break for lunch hopefully folks are here and ready for that item so madam clerk would you please read item three into the record?
2:22 – 2:346 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an urgency ordinance to adopt additional remedies for violations of county health officer orders pertaining to COVID-19. And there was a four fist vote required on this item.
And Mr. Chair, while we're transitioning I would just like to introduce the board to an attorney who joined us recently, Callie Kim, who's out in the audience and comes to us with having spent the past decade doing appellate work including for the Alaska State Court of Appeals and was our primary drafter on this package. Quick good work by her and we're glad to have her aboard.
Welcome to the county of Santa Barbara and thank you for your great work. Very timely. Mister Blanket Millican.
Chair Hart, members of the board. Thank you for the opportunity to be here today as everyone is aware. We are now in our 6th month of dealing with. The pandemic of COVID-19. And since the beginning, the county has had really two overarching strategic objectives as it pertained to public health. The first was to stop the spread of the disease and the second was to reduce the impact of the disease on our hospitalization and ICU rate.
In other words, flattening the curve. The County Public Health Officer has taken a number of steps March 12th was when the emergency was first declared. There have been a number of public health officer orders in that intervening period, and on August the 12th, in response to an increase in case rates, the Public Health Officer issued Order 2020-10.1. In essence, the two biggest changes of that particular order prohibiting gatherings which was is somewhat broadly defined and mandating facial coverings in certain high risk situations with some exception.
Since that time, the focus of the county's efforts in terms of enforcing public health officer orders has been on education and persuasion. And this effort will continue There have been a number of steps taken through the CEO's office, public health. And the Office of Emergency Management under the auspices of what was unified command for the first 3 month approximately 3 months of this pandemic and since then what is known as the joint decision authority?
In that in that process we Maintained a joint information center for distributing information to the public as well as 2-1-1. There was a call center where up until this week actually, where the public could call in for information that has since transitioned to the 2- 1-1 group. The Rise Ambassador Program which I know you've been briefed on extensively. A collaborative process between affected departments What are referred to as standardized tools and I'm going to go into a little bit more detail on each of those in a minute.
Our various enforcement options, and now today the urgency ordinance and the recommendations for this board. The Joint Information Center and 211 very briefly has oversight of the press conferences, press releases Social media releases and information that's posted on our website. And again, the County Call Center which just closed at the end of last week and has been replaced by 211 but from a practical perspective I think the public will see no break in service. It's updated daily by the Joint Information Center there are weekly coordination calls and there are support from JIC and from the Ambassador Program which I'll talk about in a second.
The RISE Ambassador Program, I don't want to spend a lot of time on this because I know that it's been discussed in here but essentially is a group of people the leader of the new head of it who was just appointed effective yesterday. And other staff members will be coming on board with the idea is that they will do outreach to businesses. They will respond to concerns from the community about particular activities and again, their focus is on education and persuasion about how all of us can work together to respond to this pandemic.
There are programs that are active in several cities including Goleta, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria and Lompoc And as part of the weekly legislative briefing call that we do, as well as the briefing for this board. There has been discussion about this ambassador program and what we hope to accomplish with it. Within the Office of Emergency Management there has been a compliance workgroup. It has city and county representatives We have a number of groups that are meeting to discuss representation as well as jurisdictions such as state parks, California Highway Patrol etc.
Each of that group meets and their whole focus is how can we best deal with the specific enforcement issues that arise? How do we respond to particular complaints? And these ongoing And how can we work together so that there's a unified message? That comes out of the Office of Emergency Management. And then, the Education and Enforcement Task Force is a smaller group. They take the problems that arise through the larger group and try to sort of frame them into a policy discussion.
In addition, we have recently used them as we move further into this pandemic There are certainly challenges with trying to discern that sort of the nuanced questions of the public health officer order. Well, does A apply? Does the order apply to A but does it not apply to B? And so that group is now working with environmental health group in public health to help sort of answer those nuanced questions.
There are a number of forms and tools and tracking instruments to try to keep track of the questions that are asked, the solutions that are put forward so that we maintain some kind of a documented history for this. as we go farther and farther into this. And there is no question that when this is over, all of us will be doing in effect an after action report what did we do well? What could we have done better?
And all of this comes under the tools are really just mechanical apparatus for the enforcement group to keep track of the work they've done In the realm of enforcement options, at the moment and the reason that we're here today is because on one end is really as I said the education and enforcement piece. There are some civil enforcement efforts that are tools that are available. State licensing sanctions for example cease and desist orders from the county council office or from a district attorney And filing formal injunctions in the civil process, but that's really on one far end of the spectrum.
On the other end and there has been public discussion about this is the use of law enforcement both local police and sheriffs to either make arrests or issue misdemeanor criminal citations. But there really hasn't been anything sort of occupying the middle ground in that spectrum. The reason we are here today is to try to strengthen that centerpiece, that administrative piece both in terms of fines and or the ability to suspend or revoke licenses that people may hold or that businesses may hold if they are not complying with the health officer order.
The focus behind this ordinance tonight there has been a great deal of public discussion that would appear to center on the issue of face coverings But I think it's important to note that this ordinance actually applies to all aspects of the public health officer orders that are issued, both the ones that are currently in place and ones that may be issued in weeks and months ahead if they're necessary.
This ordinance would add chapter 51 to the county code. It will be effective only until this emergency proclamation is terminated or when this board chooses to terminate it at some future date. And it establishes administrative fines, which are penalties for violating the health officer order. $100 for a first offense maximum 200 for second offense and 500 for a third offense. And again those are maximum numbers not mandated numbers.
The question has arisen several times. Well, who is going to do this enforcement? And our focus is going to be on identifying those county employees, those jobs classification whose duties already involve this kind of administrative enforcement who have experience in interacting with the public We have a number of people who have experience in issuing administrative citations.
And who would be best positioned in terms of skill and experience to do this. To establish exactly sort of how this would be carried out, what the citation will look like. Who will process those citations as they get finished? That work is still underway and really is dependent on what happens here today as we go forward. It's important to note that the Director of Emergency Services Essentially oversees this through the Office of Emergency Management, but the CEO of the county is the director of emergency services and all of that will be run through that office.
Today you're being asked pursuant to this government code section to implement this urgency ordinance as described to read the title and waive further reading And determine that the adoption of this is exempt from CEQA. And in addition, to waive the notice of exemption of the six-day posting that's required under normal CEQAs guidelines. And with that I'm open to any questions you may have.
Thank you Mr. Merlikian. Any questions
for staff?
2:34 – 2:406 turns
Okay. Do we have any public comments on this item?
Chair Hart and members of the board, we have eight requests to speak on this item.
Let's go to public comment.
And we will begin with Andy Caldwell to be followed by Dr. Hazel Whitman.
Chair Hart, members of the board. Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. As you know I was not a big huge fan of the mask mandate however I wear one. I haven't been in very many places where people are not wearing them. I think that in some cases the people that are not wearing them have a medical reason as such and I think this is coming at the wrong time California's rates, Santa Barbara County's rates are precipitously dropping.
We need to reward people not become punitive at this point. Again, you know, notwithstanding the concerns from Isla Vista just because of the nature of college life and the nature of their living situations and party lifestyle. The fact is the rest of the community is doing really well And we just don't think you need to add this tool in your tool basket. I think it could be awkward. It could be problematic and it is punitive. I think your board's done a good job of not being punitive up to this point and it's just hard to understand while the numbers are dropping why would you bring this up now?
Summer's going to be over here pretty soon The tourists will not be here as much. You know, the restaurants are already hurting by having to be forced outside. Some of them including institutions that have been restaurants that have been open for 65 years are now closed indefinitely. So we would ask you to not pass this. We don't know why your staff thinks they need this now Whether at the beginning when a lot of people were reticent and resistant to comply with the orders.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Dr. Whitten and I'm absolutely horrified by this whole proposition that we're going to be forcing people to wear masks. This is not the world that I would want for myself or anyone. My favorite quote for this week is that me and God constitute a majority. Truth is not democratic. It's not a popularity contest. Just because everyone believes in the mask doesn't make it effective and true any more than when everyone believed in the world was flat.
Voltaire said those who can make you believe in absurdities can make you committed atrocities. You can't pass laws just because the ideas are popular. You have to have scientific justification. You have to take into account the real life costs and benefits What science do you have to show that masks are effective at spreading this virus? How many people will it save? What are the costs of your policies in terms of depression, suicide, domestic violence and everything else.
Do you have those numbers? What are the negative effects of this Orwellian proposal to fine people for not covering their faces? What's the end goal? When does this end? One in four people aged 18 to 24 contemplated suicide in the past three months. People don't even want to live on this planet anymore. Schools are closed and kids are not even affected by COVID, and don't transmit it to adults.
There has never been a single case of a child transmitting COVID-19 to an adult. It's unfounded fear, and you're destroying these children's lives, turning everyone into hypochondriacs All you focus on is a single metric of COVID-19 cases. You have to look at the big picture and all the other effects of these policies. COVID is like the flu, it's just an RNA virus that's mutated hundreds of times.
The CDC put out a report where there was 14 controlled trials That showed that there was no substantial effects that masks or social distancing or any of these measures have a substantial effect on spreading the disease, on spreading flu. And this is just like the flu. Do you know why we've never worn face mask for flu in past years? It's because they were proven not to work Why have we never locked down healthy people in the past and covered their faces?
I'll send you this study. They don't work, and we can take them all off and come out of our little holes. You know, in a recent report it showed Bill Gates has given $250 million to dozens of media outlets to get the media to position this psychopath as some sort of health expert The same sound bites over and over hypnotizing the public into fear inducing statements.
All this fear is driving towards his agenda of a world vaccine, and you're helping him to do it.
2:41 – 2:485 turns
We will now go to Peggy Wilson to be followed by Kimberly Kapazaza.
Hi, my name is Peggy Wilson and I've been a resident for 50 years in Santa Barbara. And my husband works in drug development for over 40 years. He's worked with viruses and the FDA. Of course, I'm against what you're trying to do but I want to give some reasons for that. You guys are missing some key information to be making decisions that are taking us down in the wrong decision on the wrong path. And the information I'm giving supports opening up Santa Barbara City And the key information that's missing Board of Supervisors that might be, that's not on your website but you might have is the age of people who die with COVID and did they die with comorbidities. So I'm specifically contrasting deaths to be the key point that you need to be looking at and not positive tests as a scientific coming from my husband scientific positive tests are confusing there's many false positives They don't offer meaningful information.
Okay, and this is what's keeping Santa Barbara and California shut down. Okay? Deaths need to be the key factor in age of people that die with COVID. What's their age? And did they die with core morbidities? And actually you came out with a paper on 821 that said the last three deaths in Santa Barbara were between the age of 50 and 69 all with core morbidities. Okay so that fits what the facts are People who are at risk for contracting COVID are 55 years or older with comorbidities. And of course, never in the history of mankind do you isolate and shut down a healthy population to prevent the spread of a virus. You protect and isolate those who are at risk. So Santa Barbara has a population of 91,000 that's one death for 9,000 people or one 100th of 1%.
The county has a population 448,000 that's two over 100 to one hundredth of 1% and you're making these draconian decisions. It's it's crazy. Okay here's the fact COVID there in California there's not been one COVID death for those under 18 years of age okay the recovery rate for those with COVID 45 years or under are 98.9%. Hey, we should be clapping at this information as you said hospitalizations are down and ICU stays are down your doctor reported it earlier. So there's actually more deaths with influenza than people with COVID, okay? Under 45 years of age. So the cure is becoming more lethal than the virus. We've got hopelessness, despair, children, isolation, depression, suicides, businesses shut. Now you're going to do this thing? Please, do your homework.
Correlate the information of all those patients that die, how old they are and did they have comorbidities. No decision should be made To take more draconian measures to continue this lockdown and now police people, more upset? Please do your homework. Open up our businesses in our county. Thank you.
Thank you Ms. Wilson.
We will now go to Kimberly Capasazza to be followed by Anne Noir-Gallo.
Hello everybody. Thank you so much for just listening to me. I'm not really political. I've never done this before but I'm a teacher and I miss my students and I love history. So I just thought I'd give you my little viewpoint in light of these three other previous very illustrious speakers. My point does history repeat itself? And yes it does because people and behaviors really don't change or the ages But I just wanted to bring up after the French Revolution, a really great guy by the name of Maximilien Robespierre, look him up, was appointed to the Committee of Public Safety. Very important.
And under this banner of public safety he slowly, slowly took away French citizens' basic civil rights. I want you to look this up. Go find an encyclopedia that has had a good editor. Don't look at Wikipedia. And he began to have citizens report on fellow citizens. And yeah, the reign of terror was born and I don't know if you realize that Bonaparte, Napoleon Bonaparte came after him.
But anyways what he fought against was really quite noble under the guise of public safety but what happened was he became what he hated. He took away civil liberties I really believe you guys, we all want to do the right thing. We want to protect life. But wanting to find people to wear masks under this guise of public safety is going to set a very dangerous precedent. So I just wanted you to kind of think about that and chew on that because if you look at history which I love Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin, Lenin I'm going to go ahead and get started.
You might start something that sounds really good, but it could turn into something more terrible I think than anything we can imagine. Because you know when you pass a law there's always other effects, unintended effects. So my charge to you as a little school teacher, learn from history. Look at the past. Try not to repeat it because you hold great power and influence over us here in Santa Barbara County And I just wanted to share my thoughts about history and how public safety is a very powerful, compelling force. And yet we must be aware that it can lead to a great destruction of civil liberties. And believe me, I have lived around the world. I have been behind the Iron Curtain. I have traveled through Southeast Asia on backpacks.
And what we have in America is unique, and I want to protect it. And because one of my favorite movies is Legally Blonde 2—I know, don't laugh—and she said speak up! You know?
2:48 – 2:564 turns
We will now go to Anne-Noire Gello to be followed by Betsy Cleary.
Hi, thank you for hearing us today. I firmly oppose this proposal or any that would codify current or future health orders. The people of Santa Barbara County are intelligent and capable and you must treat us as such. We are able to make informed decisions with our doctors and read the science that will help keep ourselves and our community safe without such harsh measures. The guidelines that are in place have been very effective. This would be a great waste of resources that is unnecessary at this time, and could be better used to help us open our county and get people back to school and work.
This proposed legislation on SARS-2 COVID-19 compliance has no basis in science. Show us the science that says medical interventions such as masks work to slow the spread of SARS-2 COVID-19. The CDC's links to studies are inconclusive, and there have been dozens of studies since 2005 that show masks do little to stop the spread of an aerosol-sized virus such as COVID-19.
And often do more harm. Please read the studies. Proper immune health and hygiene has a greater impact on infectious illnesses. So again, why are you wasting resources of on this instead of education to people on how to keep their bodies healthy from the start and our immune system strong. This started with a two week quarantine to flatten the curve so that hospitals would not be overwhelmed. That was five months ago. Facilities are not being overwhelmed. The numbers are 5 one hundredths of what we were told they would be. The survival rate is over 99 percent We have never in all of history done this to healthy people in the past. We should isolate those who have severe health risks and keep them healthy, not punish those that are healthy trying to help our communities.
We have never done this for any flu season. We have never done this for any more deadly viruses including tuberculosis which kills 10 million worldwide annually and we have had outbreaks in the Santa Barbara County We did not shut down the county for those outbreaks. Other countries, other states, other counties have had great success without such harsh mandates.
If the expectation is that no one ever gets sick and zero cases of SARS to COVID-19, that is completely unreasonable. That is not how epidemiology works. Read the science. Dr. Burke, as well as many other doctors have stated looking at the morbidity rate not case rate provides more accurate information to make community health decisions. Please oppose any proposals to penalize the public in this matter. Thank you.
We will now go to Betsy Cleary to be followed by Tara Trujillo.
Okay. Dear members of the board, I'm actually going to jump right into this because I am a seven-time pneumonia survivor so it's super personal to me. So I'm jumping right in as far as empirical evidence to support the casual use of masks to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in outdoor uses. The CDC footnotes acknowledge that Researchers lack the evidence that masks offer any protection against COVID-19.
WHO, World Health Organization remains neutral on masks pointing out that mask and lack of evidence associated with masks noting that medical masks should be reserved for health care professionals who are fitted properly. That's what that's meaning. New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine states, we know wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little if any protection from infection. Then they follow up with the same doctors wrote, we intend this statement to apply to passing encounters in public spaces not for sustained interactions in closed environments. So we're really talking about passing encounters in public spaces.
So me personally I look at science Scientific data shows no concrete evidence that passing encounters in public spaces transfers COVID-19. Social distancing and hand washing are scientifically proven to be the best prevention from spreading and contacting COVID- 19. In fact, prolonged mask wearing increases the risk of disease to the wearer. First, CO2 buildup builds up in the body by re-breathing CO2 that our lungs have exhaled and is dangerous.
Personally, my father nearly died five years ago from CO2 poisoning. The increase of CO2 in his system caused him a failing heart, failing kidneys and failing liver. Secondly, our natural immune system is compromised When meaning decreased by not breathing in naturally occurring pollen, dust virus, yes virus and bacteria particles which is very dangerous especially to children. This is all verified by doctors over and over again.
So the two things CO2 buildup and our national natural immune response is compromised. Personally as I stated prior I've had pneumonia seven times and my father nearly died of CO2 poisoning Wearing a mask is dangerous for our health. When we do wear a mask, we personally I wear a mask when I briefly am visiting a store but no mask should be worn when passing casually outside in outdoor encounters.
Science lacks the empirical evidence to support this kind of casual outdoor environmental transfer in the prevention of COVID And just to take a note, should you vote on the enforcement of this ordinance for mandatory outdoor mask wearing?
2:56 – 3:026 turns
We will now go to Tara Trujillo to be followed by Terry Strickland.
Thank you. My name is Tara. I am calling from Wampanoag. I served in the Army in preventive medicine, and I did epidemiology there. And I wanted to make sure that you guys took time to read the public commentary. I read all 18 letters sent to you guys to oppose this, including one from a doctor. So again, 18 out of 18 letters that were included in attachments were asking you guys to oppose this. And my second point is I'm wondering who's reading the science on this issue. If we're deferring to someone else who is clearly not reading the science, please read the science.
Most people won't take the time to bother and will just take the word of the WHO or the CDC or the health officer but I did read the studies. The CDC has a whole page of impressive looking recent studies supposedly in support of mask wearing and that is the page in the context. And surely they would put their most compelling evidence at the top of the list But they haven't apparently either that or there's no evidence.
So I'm going to share a couple of excerpts and I want you to keep in mind that this is what's backing up the claim that masks do anything to slow the spread, and you're considering punishing those whom refuse to acquiesce to this nonsense. So a little bit about that. There's no compelling evidence to substantiate wearing a mask in the first place but if you tell a lie enough times people will start to believe it.
And the studies are very low numbers. And if you know anything about studies, we're looking for a lot of large numbers to determine if the study is valid or relevant. The first study has four patients with mild cases. Their conclusions are research is needed to determine whether such patients can be treated with appropriate guidance and oversight outside the hospital. Nothing about masks.
The second study 16 patients published in the New England Journal of Medicine. They concluded that How SARS-CoV-2 viral load correlates with cold, curable virus needs to be determined. Nothing about masks. That was 16 patients. The third study is three patients, two without symptoms also known as healthy people in a family and their conclusions were in the case of this family since the time between presentation and identification of SARS-CoV- 2 infection was short More studies are needed to observe symptoms and test results of infected individuals in greater detail. Again, not about masks.
Fourth study six family members presumed asymptomatic one tested negative and then later tested positive after the other family members tested positive they concluded the mechanism by which a symptomatic character carriers acquire and transmit the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 requires further study not about masks. That's a poor Top studies listed at the CDC website. Again, there is no science to back this up and to make this something that people are going to be paying fines for or have some sort of infraction on their record is absolutely ludicrous. Please oppose it. Thank you.
We will now go to Terri Strickland to be followed by Lee Heller.
Hi, this is Terry Strickland chair hard for I just want to say when I read the proposed ordinance. I was outraged. I can't believe that timing of this is very curious. I don't understand it. I see this as extreme government overreach at a time when you should be doing whatever you can to help this county this community your struggling constituents Open businesses and get this economy moving again. You want to be fining people?
I read the proposed ordinance, and it wasn't as vague as Mr. Melekian's presentation was about who will issue these citations. The proposed ordinance says almost anybody that you deem can do it. The county clerk like she doesn't have enough to do. The assessor, the coroner, the county veterinarian, you know citizens against citizens. Really I'm just aghast that you would even do this at this time.
What a waste of staff time and our tax dollars. I'd like to know how much it costs to the staff, how much it costs taxpayers to do this proposed ordinance You know there will be legal pushback on this. There has to be I mean there are so many people with health reasons not to wear a mask that this won't go unlooked and why? Why are you doing this at this time?
Is it for the money? And if it's not for the money, is it so we can add more county staff to the payroll job security for them? I don't understand it. There is no urgency, there's no need for this. And if you think you won't be inundated by calls from your constituents about getting cited to this, represent your struggling communities. People are out of work.
They can't pay their bills. They're stuck at home teaching their kids When they should be in school. I just say no to this ordinance. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr Quinn.
We will now go to Lee Heller to be followed by Britta Bartels.
3:03 – 3:098 turns
Chair Hart. Chair Hart and members of the board good morning. It's a little disappointing to listen to these speakers and realize that all the years that I taught critical thinking as a college professor seem to have gone to naught because science is not equal. Citing a couple of small studies does not reflect the overarching scientific consensus on what's necessary to control this pandemic. And it is in fact a combination of social distancing Mask wearing in locations where social distancing is either not possible or droplet or aerosol transmission is likely, hand hygiene and so forth. We have done a great job in this county recently and I really want to applaud the health department and the task force and the other entities that have worked together to increase compliance and reduce our numbers accordingly but as you know there are some persistent violators.
Isla Vista which Mr. Caldwell cited earlier is going to be a real challenge And just as the university is looking at cracking down on students who are persistent violators, the county needs a mechanism for cracking down on those people that are persistent and egregious violators. And for those people who are concerned about the police becoming involved consider the fact that the police enforce seatbelt mandates so if people are being required to wear seatbelts I don't really understand what the concern is about being required to wear a mask in certain settings And to engage in appropriate social distancing. So I am calling in support of this urgency ordinance, thank you.
Thank you Dr. Heller.
We will now go to Britta Bartels to be followed by Terry Keene.
Hi, my name is Berta Bartels and I wanted to thank the Board of Supervisors too and take my questions and my comments. First of all, I'm wondering about are we going to be chased like dogs by dog control vehicles that come down and look for people that don't wear a mask or how is this going to be? And how much money does it cost to pay all these people which was mentioned before I think we have enough people that don't have a job right now that don't want their tax money to go towards this kind of service. And then secondarily, I have never really liked to wear a mask because I get really serious breathing issues and anxiety from not being able to breathe properly. I have talked to other people about this and they also agreed with me. There is actually the study like previous doctors and speakers mentioned that when you wear a mask and you re-inhale your own carbon dioxide, that it actually puts a lot of stress on your adrenal glands.
And the adrenal glands are throwing out a lot of cortisol which is weakening our immune system in the long run so I cannot see myself weakening my immune system by wearing these masks all day long especially if I'm also in my car where I don't really have people next to me that could get me sick And I just don't know if this is going the right path, because we have other things to worry about. Like for example, I'm more worried about people standing like in line at these pot shops and dealing with people drugging themselves up and fighting the anxiety and increasing the tax money over these people than having healthy people buying money or spending money on their vitamins to get a healthy immune system. And I mean, I'm just absolutely furious about this thing that we are supposed to pay it for a ticket if we don't wear masks or we can't wear masks because we have breathing problems.
And you know, I think that this is really like a sad thing that's on the agenda. I'm sorry to say that but hopefully you're not making the decision. I am definitely in opposition of this decision. Thank you.
Thank you Ms. Bartow.
We will now go to Terry King to be followed by Lori Punches who is our final speaker.
Good morning, this is Terry King and I'm calling in because I feel passionately. I support the ordinance 100%. The reason I support the ordinance is because I listen to the health experts Dr. Fossey who was the top infectious disease expert in the world, the CDC, the World Health Organization and my question to the public is What do we have to lose by wearing a simple cloth mask?
We have 25% of the deaths from COVID-19 in the USA and yet only 4% of the population. We are in a pandemic, we've never faced a threat like this before in our lifetime that I've ever seen I support it because I'd like to see our kids back in school. I'd like to see businesses back in full function because this is killing our economy. This is not a political statement to not wear a mask. It is a health matter we need compliance and we're not getting it.
I hope people can be less selfish because when it is your own family member Most people decide they feel very differently about compliance. People that bring out health reasons for not wearing a mask has no scientific support whatsoever. Thank you so much for your time and thank you for the good work that you all do.
Thank you, Miss King.
3:09 – 3:158 turns
And we will now go to Lori Punches who is our final speaker.
Hi. I heard about this meeting and I was really upset. First of all, I want to say this is not about protection. This is about control. If anybody doesn't know that they should get to know this Governor Newsom and all these different laws that they're putting on us. This is an unlawful law and the reason why mask wearing even in stores Which I believe everybody understands that there are certain, we've learned so much. There's certain communities of people that are really vulnerable and we care for them and we love them and we don't want them to get sick. And when we're indoors, we do it because out of honoring people. But when we're outdoors, it is free to wear a mask. And you don't catch it from the windy air. You catch it usually from touching your face Or if you're in close proximity talking to somebody, like we're talking a couple feet for half an hour.
This is ridiculous. This is about control not about protection. It is an unlawful law and every single fine—and I'm putting this out there—every single fine, I'm going to fight it because it's unlawful, it's unconstitutional, and you cannot fine me. You can write me up all the tickets you want, Santa Barbara County, but it is an unlawful law and when I get to the judge It will be deemed an unlawful law and I will win. So just to anybody out there that's afraid to get fined, don't be because they cannot fine you. They cannot close in on me because it's illegal, unconstitutional, unlawful law and a judge can not judge fair on an unlawful law except if he dismisses the case.
I'm done,
thank you.
Thank you Ms. Bunches.
And that was our final speaker.
Thank you very much. The matter is back to the board? Supervisor Williams.
Well, I feel like many of the maybe mask dissenters that spoke brought up some important points but I feel like reached the wrong conclusion. To me this mask wearing is about control it's about returning to local control And it's about that we are all concerned about the health effects that is keen indicated and. The economic and psychological effects that the other speakers talked about.
There are increasing depression, there is increasing health effects from people that lose their jobs or can't get enough work but the only way we can help society return back to normal is to reduce that transmission rate and there is at least decent scientific evidence That mask wearing, in addition to the measures we already know like social distancing can help us return to that. So first of all I just you know my grandmother lived in occupied Europe. Mask wearing is not to me fit the definition of draconian or wellian I don't think they are comparable as someone who has had a family member live in such regimes.
I feel like it is a small price to pay for returning to a free society, returning to a society where kids can go to school. Returning to a society where we can move about and interact without fear. And so to me it's a means to achieve the goals that both sides I would just read a bit of the text. The staff report that I thought was enormously important. The intent of the ordinance is to deal with those particularly egregious situations where education and persuasion is deemed ineffective in slowing the virus.
That that our tools remain. Persuasion and education. Those are primary tools, but there are sometimes where that is not enough so we're still trying to achieve I think a societal covenant about how I think it's important that we have a safe society and how we can return to a more normal state of affairs. Education persuasion is still our primary tools, but it is occasional that enforcement is necessary to supplement those at least to set an example.
Thank you, Supervisor Williams. Any other comments from board members?
3:15 – 3:275 turns
Yes, a couple of points I'd like to make. First of all, I think our public health officer and our county council's office have been extremely mindful of protecting civil liberties. I think none of us fully appreciate all the effort that goes, and we've heard I mean, we get lots of emails as members of the Board of Supervisors. And we get many, many people saying this is going on and why isn't somebody out here enforcing this? You come out here or you get somebody out there. So there's a whole side we're not hearing but we've had a health officer in a county council that has tried to balance these needs and have invested an enormous amount in trying to do that.
And I think we have also worked extremely hard, first and foremost on education. We heard earlier about the JIC and the PSAs and all the outreach effort to trusted advisors. The RISE program, the Ambassador Program. These are all efforts to educate people about how significant it is. There was the Protect Respect, we just saw that mask program. So we are working very very hard to educate our community about how important it is for all of us to take care of each other I think there are a couple of points that seem to be like outdoor masks or something and that seemed to be a lot of the focus of public comment. This deals with all of our health orders, not just masks And one example is gatherings, people who have gatherings who are really defying any kind of our health order and then people come.
We're in the midst of I mean people if you go to Solvang or the San Ynez Valley or State Street We're all feeling COVID fatigue. We're all desperate to be involved with people again and get back to normal, and so we're coming out and interacting with each other, and we have to remember that we're going to undermine our good efforts if we don't keep distance, We're going to Education outreach, all of those things are first and foremost. And this is simply it's an administrative remedy. This isn't something that's criminal that we're going to put you in jail. And it's something that we would use with the greatest reluctance. We've kind of pushed this off until right now and We even want to use, but just to say that it's an arrow in our quiver.
It's something we could use gives us additional ability to persuade people please pay attention so I'm supportive of this. I appreciate everyone who Called in, we are concerned about civil liberties and overreach of government. But this is an administrative not a criminal remedy and it is something that we just would hold in reserve. And it's something that we're just doing because there is COVID fatigue. And that is something people are kind of losing a bit of their desire to comply so that's why now.
Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Any other comments? Yeah. I've got some. Mr. Chair, thank
you. Well, I think you saw my picture. I'm on the slide with the mask to encourage people to wear masks. I wear a mask anytime I'm out going into a store go just about anywhere around. But at the same time, I just think this is a significant overreach. For me there's a couple of reasons why. First off when you read the ordinance it does say that should the virus spread unchecked we could be overwhelming our Healthcare industry, and for me that's been the biggest thing throughout this entire exercise is to make sure that our hospitals and our healthcare workers aren't overloaded.
I think that's what separates us from the flu or what separates it from anything else in my mind is that we want to make sure hospitalizations are down, med surges are down, and ICUs are down. And when we look at our numbers, hospitalizations are down 35%, ICUs down 28%, med surge down 39%. So for me the timing's just difficult. If this would have been brought to me in April when we weren't sure what was gonna happen and how things were gonna play out I might've had a different take on it but I think what we've seen through this entire process is our numbers do not drastically fluctuate They follow trends. There's a two week trend where sometimes it trends a little up, then it trends down and right now we're in a downtrend.
So if for some reason we did see the healthcare industry just get severely swamped and overloaded within you know, it would take awhile for that to happen. I might have a different perspective at that point. And so, because I just don't see that happening right now. I've also think that Santa Maria's shown that education and outreach works once we found the right message and we started speaking in a language that people here understand and met them where they are.
You know, I think we saw a lot more compliance with the rules. And I think we've seen the numbers play out from there where we've gone. For those that have said, and I gotta say this comes from staff from a very well-meaning perspective. For those that are out there that say, well, we don't understand why this is happening. Is this just some sort of money grab for the county? At 100 bucks a fine, It's not, no one is going after. It's not a revenue grab. It would cost us way more money to implement this than it would be whatever we got back.
People are, I understand why staffed it. It's a look for a tool to continue to get people to be more compliant so that at the end of the day we can open up businesses. But I think right now we are in a position where we should be pushing the governor that, and I know we're doing this but we gotta continue to do this. That our numbers are trending in the right direction.
Our healthcare workers are not overloaded. Our hospital is open. 50% of ICU beds are available and 68% of ventilators are available. At what point do we say, we're there? We need to start looking at this entire society as a whole of we gotta get people back to work. I just read that mortgage I'm And so I don't think, honestly at this point going back to the community.
And telling them that we've got to find you if we find you without a mask or your gathering. I think there are other, I mean, I think the sheriff is already, I spoke with him yesterday. He said that they've had a handful of very egregious situations that they actually wrote tickets on. I don't have a problem with that. We do have to have some sort of mechanism in place if somebody's just flaunting the law that we do something but I think that's gotta be done with law enforcement.
I really don't like the idea of animal control officers or, I mean shoot Board of Supervisors were on that list of people that would be able to write a ticket. If you're not in law enforcement, you don't know how to approach people. And deal with a situation like this and try to de-escalate it, we could run into some real serious problems out there. So I'm opposed but like I said if for some reason we saw the healthcare system getting overburdened again at some point it would be something that I'd be willing to take another look at.
Thank you Supervisor Lavinino. Mr Chair? Supervisor Adam yes please go right ahead.
Thank you. I think this is a well-intentioned but profoundly bad idea. With all due respect, this ordinance vests and consolidates unreasonable power in a poorly defined group of unelected bureaucrats. We already have the power to issue citations through the sheriff. These come with a potential $1,000 fine as well so they are serious. If there's a particularly egregious case we do have the option.
Through the COVID crisis, we have suffered a tremendous loss of our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. We cannot attend church services, have a wedding, a funeral or a concert. We cannot eat inside a restaurant, get a haircut or have our nails painted. We have been told at various times to refrain from hiking, biking and going to the beach. Hasn't our freedom been impinged enough?
We need to be Americans at the end of all of this. If adopted, this ordinance will be profoundly divisive in this day of polarization of our society. We should avoid causing more stress to our citizenry than is absolutely necessary. As a society we're going to need to live. When we started out, the whole point and strategy was to prevent our medical infrastructure from being overwhelmed. That danger has passed.
We have a waning positive testing rate, hospitalization rate and death rate even without 100% participation of social distancing and other control measures. The populace of our county should be relieved that the worst has passed. It seems like this measure is untimely and obsolete. I understand that we all have a constituency that is fearful for their own health and that of their loved ones. I understand it is tempting to all of us to literally do anything and everything possible to reduce that fear.
I hope that we could tolerate the limited amount of dissent and conduct representing opinions that diverge from the majority.
3:27 – 3:326 turns
Thank you, Supervisor Adam. Well, we will not have four votes necessary to pass the urgency measure, but I imagine we could do it this low way and supervisor Williams. Well,
I first of all because I think that one of the things that has held back our response effectively coronavirus is our is that normally in disasters we that brings out our societal empathy right? And I think one of the things that's hindered our country and our community is that in this case, this emergency has divided us more instead of united us more. I'm going to concentrate on what I agree with that the minority is articulating. And I agree that the cumulative effect of our loss of ability to do all the things that keep businesses alive, keep people in their jobs, keep people's mental health high, this is a great burden I do not believe, I believe that mask wearing in particular and social distancing is a way to facilitate us returning to be able to do all of those activities.
So as such, you know I will move that we strip the urgency element from the ordinance and proceed with the first reading of the ordinance. Now that procedurally my understanding is that means it needs to come back for a second reading and it would not take effect for 30 days Withhold you know the right to change my mind if infections are down dramatically. But I do believe that we do need to take some steps to increase our commitment I think there are people that take it too far and that's not in the health order. And that's not in the ordinance, we should be Regardless of your opinions on these issues, but I do think that this is a step towards Increasing our commitment to the steps. It would be necessary to return to
normal life Is there a second to supervisor Williams motion? Mr.. Ghazani
I'd just like to talk a little bit about the framework, the statutory framework which matches pretty much as Supervisor Williams had laid out. For an urgency ordinance that would become effective today upon a forfeits vote if it was not an urgency ordinance it becomes effective 30 days after passage with the second reading or enactment being at least five days at a regular meeting after the first regular meeting The package that's in front of you today is tailored as an urgency ordinance, which means that if the board wanted to make this a first reading today I would recommend trailing it so we could look at whether we could actually move it quickly enough that you could vote on it today. That would be one option. We could bring it back as a regular ordinance at the next meeting for first reading, or we could simply put it on the shelf as a draft urgency ordinance and have it available as a tool for the board whenever you would want to enact it with a four-fifths vote.
So I think that again, the framework of this is very heavily tailored as an urgency ordinance with emergency findings. And discussion throughout. So there would be more than a few words changed if it was the board's desire to enact it as a first reading today, we would need to change the text of the ordinance as well as the secret document that go with it. So I await your discussion of that but it's not as easy as just calling it a first reading today. We would need to give you exact wording for the change and put that on the screen and make it available to the public.
So the choice is to trail later today supervisor Adam
I'm just going to register an objection to this. I mean, come on. It's outrageous that you guys are gonna try and switch it midstream like this. You know, I think at the least you should bring it back as a standalone regular ordinance. I think that these are parliamentary procedures which I just don't appreciate.
3:32 – 3:4221 turns
We have the maker of the motion. I just had some some questions yet and a few comments So, I'm not sure procedurally should I get those out there would you like to I
think questions are fine. I just think that You know My understanding if we have to bring it back for our first reading on another day is The first thing I want to point out. The second reading can be. Debated and can be stopped. And it can't take an effect without the 2nd reading. So if. Supervisor Adam is looking for. We're going to have a discussion about that. So my preference would be to trail it and bring it back. But if that's not possible, then we'll just you know.
We have a number of things converging and I'm particularly sensitive to this in Isla Vista where there's a lot of concern about law enforcement and a resistance to having armed Officers coming and responding. And there's a huge desire to see other kinds of professionals come out and respond to calls, whether they be drug and alcohol or whether they be gatherings that could be COVID gatherings, things like that.
So I find this a useful option I'd rather, if at all possible not have armed response to gatherings. If there's something else we can do but I am concerned about who it would be and I would like to see that developed a little bit more and perhaps procedures like first there is a warning and a written warning and you know we don't jump in necessarily with I know it has to go from 100 that the fines have to go after, you don't start out with the 500. You graduate that, I believe. But I wonder Dr. Malakian could you talk a little bit more or has there been more conversation about the people who would actually show up when there is some kind of a health order violation alleged?
Supervisor Hartman to the chair that question has been probably the most singular focus of all the internal discussions about how to do this. As I mentioned our The real focus of this is to try to find a middle ground between the ambassadors and uniformed law enforcement for a variety of reasons. The group that we focused on, and we have not sort of landed are people who somebody mentioned earlier you do have to have a certain skill set to be able to communicate with regards to enforcement, to actually issue the citation, to do those kind of things And so we were focused on groups that are currently already doing some version of that within our county family.
There's a whole list of departments who have enforcement arms of people who do that. So depending on what the board's action is, the next step would be to develop the protocol and part of that protocol would be to identify that group of people. So even though the ordinance technically says that anyone can designated in point of fact. We believe that for a variety of reasons, some of which you've mentioned it really needs to be some group of people who have experience in doing that.
And if I may follow up, they might have special training. And is it possible as part of that protocol then to have an escalation? That it's just written that we don't slap them first with
the... Again your point is not only I'm going to ask you a question that is appropriate and the right question. It is the best practice on how to do enforcement anyway. Very rarely, unless the situation was egregious, do you almost ever go, and this is law enforcement or administrative actors, you don't generally go directly to citation or arrest. You almost always there's a discussion, It's only when you come back a second or third time that you ramp it up.
Chair and supervisors, I would like to help the board go where they want with this but I think hearing some of the comments trying I think it would be difficult to fit in the time that you have and my recommendation would be one of two, either put it on the shelf and have it available or take suggestions for what would go into a majority vote regular ordinance and bring that back at the soonest time. Because I think we could accomplish that quickly using this shell but addressing some Whatever board members who want to provide today and we could bring that back, but I think it would be challenging.
And probably a late evening to bring this back today to convert it from an urgency ordinance to a regular ordinance.
I think that defines the parameters of our options. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank
you. Thank thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank You. Thank Thank you very much. Thank you very much. And with that I will turn it over to the board of Supervisors to discuss this item more tightly supervisor Williams. Well, then I will just move that we bring this back as a regular ordinance on another day and hopefully. In case this type of work is needed.
I think putting it on the shelf and waiting till the crisis gets worse is not a good strategy because we've already seen how long it took for this urgency ordinance to get here in the first place. I mean, I think that you know to answer some of the speakers on timing. We were undergoing a spike and was probably more useful at that time. But of course, we are still not under the state's threshold to be able to return local control and to be able to make our own decisions and be able to you know.
Returned normal life so I'll just move that we bring this back as regular ordinance
Motion's been made. Is there a second?
I would second it and I would just like to add that You know, we did flatten the curve once now We're in the process of doing it again But that doesn't mean that it'll stay down and that's the real concern is in the fall are we going to get a spike So that's why I'd like to have this in in the works
Thank you motions have made and seconded any other discussion.
I have a question Supervisor Lavanino So did any of the citations that the sheriff wrote contribute to the, I mean you can't say that because we're not passing this we're going to see a spike in the future. I mean, I think that's irresponsible. You've
got so
many people...
Let me just spike you off. I think what Supervisor Hartman said is that if we have a spike in the future this would be helpful to them. There's not a causation or a correlation. Okay, there's not a causation. Thank you, that is
correct. Alright, I understand. Thank
you. Any other discussion? CEO Miyasato.
Chair Hart, do you have a preference of when this comes back? Do you have long meetings for the next three And I just want to find the board's preference of when you would like this to come back.
Mr. Chair, I'd like to request December 25th.
Well there you have one vote for then. Well we have time to figure that out so what we're going to do is not have it next week because that is not a meeting date and then we will work through the regular agenda review process and find a time for this to come back but the direction is for it to come back. We do have a meeting next week. Oh, I got my numbers wrong.
Well you know what? We could trail this decision because I haven't had the chance to look at the calendar and figure that out. Mr. Gazzani?
3:42 – 3:4716 turns
We are prepared for best speed, but I don't need a date to bring it back That will be housekeeping item for you and the CEO.
Okay. Let's just do it that way we'll figure that out all right so the motion is Clear to bring this back at a future date Madam clerk would you please call the
roll?
No
December 25th was a future date, but that's okay
Mr. Lavinino?
I think he wants one after he's gone. Was that me? Yes. No.
Mr. Williams?
Aye.
Chair Hart?
Aye.
Motion passes 3-2
All right, we are going to adjourn for lunch for 30 minutes. We'll be back at 115. And Mr. Ghazani?
Mr. Chair I'd just like to thank the people who brought this today. I was the one who asked that it be an urgency ordinance and that's what was drafted and we had a lot of cooperation from all the departments bringing that. That's not what passed but we'll bring back a regular ordinance.
Thank you. Thank you for everybody who worked hard to get this ready. It will be used in one form or another at some point in time.
Oh, yeah. Thank you.
3:51 – 4:161 turns
Hello. Yeah. you Thank you. you Thank you. Hello. Thank you.
4:20 – 4:256 turns
We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting, which brings us to department item number four. Will the clerk please read that item into the record?
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the County Executive Office and Planning and Development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding KPMG's operational and performance review for the planning and development department.
See Omiya Sato.
Chair Hart and board members, thank you for this opportunity. There's three parts of this presentation I'm going to kick it off and then we'll have Bill Zizek and Kiva Thornton from KPMG who are zooming in to give their part of the presentation And at the end it will have Planning Development Director Lisa Plowman talk about their responses and implementation plan So why don't we go with the first slide?
So today's presentation is, again I'll give a little bit of context and scope. KPMG will discuss their findings and we'll have a response. Next slide. So this is a slide you've seen with every KPMG report we brought to you. This is part of our Renew22 effort We had KPMG begin this with us in May 2019. So far you've seen three department reports come to your board, my office, human resources and general services.
They have completed planning and development and they were nearing completion of public health before COVID so much of the information that will be presented to you today was pre-COVID. They're continuing to work on the public safety departments And as we've said, all departments we expect to be reviewed over a four-year period. Next slide. And so just to remind the board of the scope of KPMG's work it's to really look at best practices and highlight areas where improvement could be made. This is not a financial audit but the recommendations should result in efficiencies or savings or better outcomes and performance The areas selected were selected by my office with the department. And again, we appreciate Planning's time they've spent along with all our departments in providing data and assistance to KPMG in completing the work.
And as you know, Planning Development has over a 24.4 million budget with over 100 FTE, and here's their org chart. Next slide? And with that I'm going to hand it over to KPMG, Bill Zizek and Kiva Thornton.
This disease is sick and miss Thornton welcome again. Thank you.
Afternoon sure thank you to thank you chair hard members of the board, thank you CEO me us out so good afternoon. So again my name is bills as a managing director in your kpmg engagement leader. I keep the thorn is with me today or KPMG engagement director we're happy to provide you with an overview of our recommendations for the planning and development department today And we would like to just take a moment to recognize the continued leadership of your board during these challenging times and commend the ongoing resilience of the county and its communities.
As mentioned in our previous remarks, uh, to you, our process is designed to be a challenging one yet constructive does require a great deal of engagement as the CEO had mentioned from department staff Provide their data, their perspectives and insights into daily operations of their workplace and the issues they face in serving their customers. Next slide please.
Depicted on the screen is our year one timeline review of the planning and development department began last October and concluded in January of 2020. And since our last presentation we have finalized our report with the public defender We are reviewing our report currently with the Sheriff's Office. We are at the midway point with both the District Attorney's Office and probation departments in the context of today's challenges and those that may still come, we believe this process to be even more important than the county's efforts to be more resilient and flexible.
Next slide please. Briefly in terms of our methodology, we begin with engaging staff and interviews and focus groups. We analyze all available data. We survey customers where appropriate. We utilize benchmarks from other counties in a comparable range and look at leading practices to identify teams and opportunities. We provide a midpoint update to the department head and CEO team on those emerging themes ensure that we're aligned and share working drafts of our preliminary report to be thoroughly validated and commented on, and ultimately accepted by department leadership.
Leadership then prepares an implementation plan for review by the CEO's office and indicates how they will take action on these recommendations. And of course any resources that might be needed to do so successfully. Over to you Keena.
4:26 – 4:393 turns
Thank you, Bill. And if we go to the next slide please. So we'll start off as we do with each department on the commendations. There is a lot of progress that has been made within the Planning and Development Department over the last number of years and they should be commended for their commitment to change. Most importantly, one of the things that we recognize is that there has been a high degree of turnover within the department. And so their focus on employee development and the development of a training and leadership program should be highly commended if it's the unique needs of the department and embraces that continuous improvement mentality that is aligned with Renew22.
Not only do they have a... They procured a software system called Accela which I'll mention throughout the recommendation but this is a great foundation for the department to build Upon and move into a fully digital online permitting environment, they have the capabilities available. It's a case of just making some of those improvements to fully utilize the system.
In line with that, the department is actively working on digitizing its processes. So the acceptance of credit card payments, the activation of the online citizen portal utilizing technology in the field all of these are significant process improvements really help streamline the service provided and improve customer service. In addition, the department's resiliency during the disasters. There was a real focus on reducing the permit processing time during the fire mudslides and post those disasters showing the Department's dedication to service delivery and customer service.
Go to the next slide please. As with each department, we look at six core focus areas in terms of operating model maturity. With planning and development they have really strong foundations to build upon with regards to service delivery processes technology and data management. For example the processes are largely standardized within each office however to move to the right of the maturity scale the focus should be on standardizing processes across all locations and not between each office In addition, if we could go to the next slide please.
With regards to technology as I mentioned previously the Accela system offers a strong foundation for the department and the improvement would be to use all the functionality available and reduce overlap with other applications to streamline operations. So the recommendations that we've made within the report focus on how to improve the maturity of the department, focusing on leveraging these pillars to deliver more efficient and effective
services. Next slide please. Thank you so there are four main points that we would stress with you today at the department level and then our detailed in our nearly 120 page work The first is to better evaluate and balance workloads, to reduce case review times and improve customer service across the department. We observed this process to be largely qualitative and vary within each division. And while some case volume reporting is in place more structure is recommended to drive consistency and workload allocation in light of things like case status or phase, case complexity, seasonality for example. Much of this can be better captured and reported using the various systems in place. And at the counters we recommend automated tracking of wait times and appointment length to be able to better identify trends in customer demand, match staffing to those needs, and along with customer common cards to better measure and improve the customer experience.
Second is to better leverage existing systems and adopt a fully online permitting process This obviously has great benefits to customers, especially in the current environment. But it spans all activities from things like researching, applying for, paying for as mentioned, as well as receiving permits beyond just the online status checks that were enabled at the time of our review.
Internal activities for staff should also be included such as concurrent review of documents, the ability to do digital markups, providing customer feedback directly and receiving customer updates online We want to ensure here that the processes aren't just digitized for the benefit of customers while the staff remain paper-based internally. And this will, of course, enable important enhancements for customer service, reduce processing times and ensure things like required submittal documents are present before a case is accepted by the department and that customer deposits aren't charged until a completed application is received.
Third is to leverage the data generated from the various systems that exist, to establish a better process to monitor divisional performance measures internally for the department. As well as the service level agreements and expectations between departments that are involved in the various review process. This is to both improve customer cycle times, as well as to adhere to these interdepartmental expectations as there are a lot of dependencies in being able to ultimately meet customer needs.
Ongoing monitoring and managing against metrics like case aging by permit type, cycle times for inspections by type and on-time on budget projects such as in long range planning will allow for more informed staffing performance and fiscal decisions by the department. Ultimately review time metrics will help Planning and Development, and CEO staff ensure that all departments are staying on timeline to meet customer needs.
Lastly is to refresh departmental policies and procedures bringing them up-to-date to reflect these recent and ongoing efforts to streamline and digitize processes as described and recommended in our report This is a critical step to ensuring that both staff and the public know how to utilize these new online tools that are made available. That they do so consistently across all department locations and offices, to improve overall staff efficiency but ultimately benefit customer experience.
Back to you Keeva.
Thank you. If we could go to the next slide please? So while we made a number of recommendations in the report at the division level, we're going to talk today to the recommendations that have been identified in purple as priority items for the board and may require future action by the board. So to start with development review, one of the core focus areas, as Bill has spoke briefly about is the development of policies and procedures for online permitting environment So there's an increasing movement towards digitized processes, which has an impact on each division and will require the development of enhanced customer and staff focused review and communication capabilities such as plan submission, markup, concurrent review by departments and permit issuance.
So it's important that the internal processes support these digitized processes. And you can capture the benefits of online capability internally as well as externally with regards to reduced cycle times. We want to make sure that you can reduce the manual processes, improve staff capacity and streamline the overall operations. The second point which again Bill briefly mentioned is the development of an MOU or a service level agreement with internal departments.
At the moment there is no current MOU or interdepartmental setup to ensure that departments are all working Cohesively towards the same goal during the review process. This can impact the case management process overall and lead to longer review times for customers, so it's therefore recommended that department work with the other departments and stakeholders involved in the process to agree upon review cycle times that meet internal capacity and capability and customer expectations to allow for better performance management and accountability, and the ability to identify bottlenecks or delays in the process and be able to rectify it proactively.
The third item under development review is to increase over-the-counter land use permitting process. Based on our benchmark and best practice research there appeared to be an opportunity to improve the land use permitting Over-the-counter process for certain permit types that need to be identified through a series of criteria and prioritization. The implementation of a broader over-the-counter process should help reduce staff workload, improve application turnaround times and increase customer satisfaction.
The department would also benefit from developing a clear over-the counter process both internally and for customers to set expectations, increase the speed at which customers can get approved for minor land use cases. Then finally within development review, a standardization of policies and procedures across North and South County. So there are some differences in the processes across the North and South County locations.
While some of these differences are justifiable from the lens of enhancing customer experience, others may lead to inconsistent service across the locations. So in order to reduce risk it is recommended that there's a focus on standardizing and documenting the processes across both locations And ensuring that this is implemented with regards to operations daily.
This will be further supported by the digitization of processes, which will promote increased collaboration between the two offices and help standardize the customer experience in case review standards. Moving on to building and safety, the priority item for the board here is the implementation of the electronics middle functionality. At the time of our review, this was a relatively new process that was being implemented and piloted.
So it's important that the department take a whole system view of the implementation to ensure that the supporting procedures and processes are in place for both the customers and staff to know how to best utilize the process. It has the potential to streamline the operations in a significant way, both for customers and staff. However, a structured implementation plan alongside the implementation plan for the other online processes will allow the department to successfully roll out the digital solution and allow for decreased cycle times, minimize the administrative time for staff, and deliver an improved product to the customer.
Could you go to the next slide please? The final division that we will cover is long-range planning. So the first priority item for long-range planning is to increase the accuracy of work plan forecasts. The current work plan for long-range planning projects is currently developed on an annual basis, however the work plan can be fluid if new projects are added to the division during the course of the year and however in the course of the year there's not always additional resources or budget allocated for these additional projects The division should develop a strategy and process for regularly updating the board on the status of ongoing projects, and the additional workload projected for additional requests that are made throughout the year.
This will allow for categorization and prioritization of projects giving the board the right information around current projects but also highlighting projects that may be delayed to accommodate new requests that are made throughout the year. Internally, the second recommendation is around utilizing their current software Monday.com more effectively to manage staff workload and projects.
So while Monday.com is available it is not used to the full advantage at the moment as a project management tool and can be customized to allow for better management of project timelines budget progress against milestones and this will allow for more accurate reporting to the board as per the first recommendation The final update for long-range planning would be to develop a strategy for the consolidation of the comprehensive and community plans.
Over the last number of years, there have been nine community plans adopted by the board. These are all being identified and created in independent of each other and iteratively over the years. And therefore some may have conflicting or similar or identical language in the plans itself however The community must look through each individual plan in order to reconcile the needs for their project.
So a strategy for consolidating the comprehensive and community plans into one document, which will allow for a single point of information, which will benefit the community and the staff in terms of research time focus and other efforts will allow for more cohesive and better customer service.
4:39 – 4:4613 turns
All right, thank you Keeva. And just to the next slide and I'll summarize before we take any questions is the key takeaways that we'd like to leave you with today on planning and development are number one better evaluating and balancing workload to reduce case times. Number two leverage those existing systems and adopt an online permitting process to improve the customer experience Number three, establish a process to better monitor and manage divisional performance measures and those interdepartmental service level expectations in turnaround time.
And number four, refreshing existing policies and procedures to reflect the streamlined and digitized processes for better consistency for the customer and efficiency for your staff. We'd like to close again with our thanks to the Planning and Development Director and her staff, as well as the CEO and her staff for their engagement in this review. At this point we'll be happy to answer any questions you may have for us.
Thank You Mr. Zizek and Ms. Thornton. As usual a really quality comprehensive report and appreciate the collaboration from the Planning and Development Department, Ms. Plowman as well. Are there questions for the KPMG team or Ms. Supervisor Williams.
Can you go on a little bit more into the question of more over-the-counter permits?
Is that just viable in inland portions where
we don't have coastal commission, or is this something that applies to both sides? And this is a question for both the director and for the consultants. And of course the historical context
is this has come up before.
You know, and something that there have been repeated attempts in the past to make more permits streamlined shall we say or easier to obtain so you know what lessons can we learn from those previous attempts in doing this?
So I would ask the CEO, would you want us to respond first or your Planning and Development Director?
Bill and Kiva why don't you give your response to talk about why you put that in the report and then Director Pom can respond after that. Very good, Keeva go
ahead. Absolutely and so there is obviously a current over-the-counter permit process in place however over the counter permits only represent approximately 3% of total case volume on average per year and what we saw internally was that there was a degree of confusion or misunderstanding around what is allowed to be an over-the-counter permit and what these requirements are And so, really the recommendation is in two parts.
A to clarify and confirm the current over-the-counter permit process where everyone is clear about that. And then the second part is to identify those lower complexity minor land use permit case types and review them for their applicability to be an over-the-counter permit. Within the report we actually suggest a pilot program, so identifying the land use permits that could be over-the-counter based on the current cycle time, the number of departments that currently have input, the average number of touch points, really identifying those that have a lower risk profile and then piloting those as over-the counter permits for a period of time to ensure They meet the applicability and there are no appeals associated with those permit types before a full rollout takes place.
Mr Chair, Supervisor Williams I think there's a couple of things One is over-the-counter permits that actually have appeals to them, and then whether or not we could increase those types of permits that could be processed over the counter and get a notice posted and whatnot. So that's one collection. The other collection is actually making some permits that are not currently truly ministerial with no appeals and making them ministerial, which is an objective that we have for the department.
Even before we met with KPMG, that was something we were already talking about internally. The pilot program she's talking about could be applied in a way for current permits that have appeals associated with them and try to process them in a more simple fashion. That's different. The ones that we want to downshift and make them truly ministerial would then have to go through an ordinance amendment package, and in the coastal zone would end up going to the Coastal Commission for their review.
Obviously the inland choices will be easier for the board to handle because you guys will have the opportunity to make a decision whether you want those permits to be ministerial. A challenge to go through the Coastal Commission, undoubtedly. But we have regular meetings with Coastal Commission staff so I think our goal would be to vet those concepts with them in advance to make sure that at least the staff could be supportive. We'd obviously like them to be similar to the inland if not exactly the same. So that's the kind of program we would take forward and as you can see in the response that we've prepared in the implementation table The portion of making some truly ministerial is a program under the long-range plannings work program. So we will have to discuss that next fiscal year about when we want that to be done and how we're gonna fit it in with the resources that we have.
Does that answer your question?
It does. CEO Miyasato
Supervisors if there are no more questions for KPMG, I would ask Dr. Plowman to go through her slides which is in response and her implementation plan
4:46 – 4:572 turns
Thank you I'll go quickly through the recommendations and then I'm going to focus on a few that I think are going to be of greater importance to the board or sort of higher priority, if you will. So we worked with KPMG, and we had 23 total recommendations. Five of them were department-wide recommendations, and 18 of those were divisional recommendations. And we organized them into three different categories—organizational improvements, process improvements, and then technological improvements.
And by and large, we felt we were quite aligned with the recommendations that came out of KPMG and things that we had already been talking about and beginning discussions about. So I think the report ends up supporting the initiatives that we're looking at in the department. In terms of evaluating workload and case review, so we'd agreed with those comments and we think those will be completed by the third quarter of this fiscal year.
One of the things that I can highlight from that particular recommendation is the issue about case complexity. And we are working on developing methodologies so that very simple permits sort of get processed more quickly than they do currently, sometimes they get stuck behind a more complex series of cases that a planner might have. So, that's one of the things I think it's a pretty quick improvement that we can make and try and get those permits pushed through the system as quickly as possible.
Online permitting system so is Kiva and Bill mentioned we already have Acela and we're using that but it needs to be expanded And so, right now we don't have the full complement of online permitting systems where people can actually fill out their applications online or they can pay online. Where we do reviews online and other departments would have licenses to a similar, you know, Acela program if it's not Acela could be something else but And so it's a big project, but it's where we have to go to begin the 21st century.
Right now we still have paper that comes in through a PDF whereas in the future what will be every cell will be populated We will be accepting credit card payments here actually in the next few months that process is already underway. So this is going to take an investment and a commitment from our department, we'll be working with the CEO's office and then other departments as well but it's really an important step I think and to me is paramount that we make this change.
And lots of other jurisdictions have done it. And now with COVID, we've all been forced to move into a more online atmosphere and platform. All the county planning directors that I'm working with are moving into a more expanded system whether it's...I mean there's various softwares out there some of one of them is Acela but there's a lot of support for this.
The applicants and the agents that I've spoken to, they're thrilled that they can do this. They can start to submit things online now and this will just be the next step. Establishing performance management program in SLAs. So we have about, I think we have 17 performance measures that we use as guideposts for us when we look at our permit process. And the different division managers use those performance measures in working with their team and their supervisors but we recognize that there could be a more robust internal system of reviewing those, so we'll be working with the CEO's office on developing that. And then with the SLAs we will be and those are agreements between departments about reviews and that really comes into the discretionary permit process where we have flood control or environmental health or fire reviewing applications and we're going to work with a CEO's office and have an assistant CEO Mr.
Malekian, sort of guide this process with the department so we can develop these agreements and I think that will be an improvement in the process definitely. And then in terms of refreshing policies and procedures To improve our customer service. We agree with those comments we do that in an ongoing way all you know so as we update our procedures, we make sure we can communicate that information but we agreed that there could be a more systematic approach to it and then we're going to be working to develop It isn't our highest priority, as you can see.
We think the systematic approach would be something we'd be completing in the next few fiscal years but because we wanna spend our time on some of the other like the online permitting system and moving to that first. But it's still obviously important to us. And then we didn't talk much about this but cataloging future skill gaps and our internal training program We, as KPMG mentioned, had developed a leadership program.
We have run some of our Planner 3s through that program. We are going to be having a program again next year so it's quite robust and I think was very successful. The other thing is we're going to be working with human resources sort of change our job applications and the specifications for the jobs to make sure that we're getting the skills that we really want. And I think that's been due for an update, so this is in a couple of phases but they should be done next fiscal year.
So in terms of administration, I'm not going to spend a significant amount of time on this slide. But in general these recommendations we've agreed with them. We had some comments in some areas but as you can see the streamlining the reimbursement process that will be the end of this fiscal year. Infant lending service now is going to be something we'll be working on and it will be next fiscal year and then Granicus will start working Thank you very much.
Development of the GIS system. That's a program that's being undertaken by the CEO's office right now, Mr. Frappel is working on an enterprise GIS system and so we are participating with them in that process and I think that recommendation is tied to that activity and that endeavor. Next slide please. So in terms of development review So the first recommendation is the development of procedures for online processing, and that really is tied to the departmental recommendation of online services and upgrading our SLA program. And development of the MOU and SLAs with the departments is included in our recommendation for number three. We'll be working with the CEO's office on that.
Increasing the over-the-counter perming, that again is something that we have to discuss in next fiscal year when we talk about the long range work program and how we will fit that in. And then standardizing our procedures, we'll be working on that over the next two fiscal years. Next slide? With respect to building and safety, that is also part of the larger online permitting transition. And is included in recommendation number two. And I realize I didn't talk as much about how long it's going to take us to get to online permitting. And that's something we're going to engage the CEO's office on. But we expect that it would be fully up and running within two years So we're looking at fiscal year, I believe I said it was 21-22.
is when we think we will be rolling that out. And then just the other recommendations regarding in-field training and expanding the use of Acela and creating this standardized process, those are going to be handled in this fiscal year and some of them are already underway currently in the department. Next slide? With respect to long-range planning and as KPMG noted, most of these involve policy decisions by the board. The increase in the accuracy of the work plan forecast and that really comes down to us setting out a program where we're regularly informing the board of where we are with the work program and then when items come up midyear And the board makes a policy decision about taking on a new program that hadn't been anticipated, then we will be working with the board to figure out what it is that can be delayed so that there's clear understanding of where we are going to be with the work program and what the expectations are of that division for that fiscal year and future fiscal years.
I'm fully utilizing our project management tool, monday.com. We're looking at that. We use other tools as well. It's not the only tool we use but we're going to be looking at and initiating that in the third quarter of this year and completing some assessment of how we might expand the use of that. And then regarding- Mr.
Chair? Yes, Supervisor Adam?
4:57 – 5:0912 turns
I'm just wondering why we wouldn't use, or maybe you're intending to do that but it's not clear to me here. Why wouldn't we use monday.com for all divisions rather than just long range planning?
Madam Chair, Supervisor Adam. It really suits itself to these sort of longer term projects and programs that we have. We can certainly look at it to see how it would work for development review but we have pretty set schedules for permit processing on those But I'm happy to look into it to see how we might be able to apply it. I don't think it would necessarily be something we would use in building and safety, but maybe for the energy projects or some of the development review projects.
In general, it's been used by long-range planning because that's sort of how the program works best and that's my understanding. But I am happy to look into that further.
Well, it just seems to me that you'd want to know how long it took you to do almost everything. So if you use some kind of power tracking software that got you to be able to understand how much time you're spending on things Tell whether even the 30 day windows or what have you were really luxurious, or whether they could be tightened up and we could actually expect reasonably for things to be turned around faster.
Yeah, Mr Chair, Supervisor Adam, Acela does some of that for us already. In the ability to track things so I will take a look at that just to make sure that there isn't. an aspect of Monday.com that would assist us with that, but I think it's as we go into this more comprehensive and advanced online system that Acela has some of those tools that will help us track that for those types of cases development review cases in the larger energy projects.
I appreciate the comment though.
Well yeah, and if you're able to do it in other ways that's great but I was under the impression that for at least the time being we're really not tracking hours spent. We're tracking how many times were getting out ahead of the due dates. And I'm not sure that that's probably the most productive metric to use. Because if you got an opportunity to get more people, for instance, could you lower the number of days that we have to turn something around?
Mr. Chair, Supervisor Adam. Just to clarify, we do track our hours and we monitor that. But we can certainly look at ways in which we can improve and perhaps develop an additional performance measure that would be more specific to that when we work on the department recommendation number three. But I think Acela is the right tool for development review. And the last recommendation with respect to long-range planning is developing a strategy for the consolidation of our comprehensive plan and our community plans. And that's quite a big endeavor, and it's something that we already have built into the Long Range Work Program when it would start in fiscal year 22-23.
Last slide I think is next one. So this really these
can I just ask you briefly about that to I don't necessarily disagree with that strategy. I guess what I'm worried about is proactively touching community plans sounds like a whole lot of additional work and therefore, a whole lot of other delay for maybe some countywide priorities. And so what would you kind of. You know and this question could be for the consultants to I mean, you know if the thing that we're having real problems right now is getting Countywide priorities done.
Why would even touching anything to do with community plans be a good idea.
Mister chair supervisor Williams, I appreciate that question. I think it will come down to what the board's priorities are but I I think the consolidation of our plans into the comprehensive plan will make our process simpler we have a lot of overlap in policies And we've got multiple plans and our goal isn't to eliminate things that are unique for communities. Our goal is to align the policies where we have overlaps or small inconsistencies, correct those So that just makes review process simpler, not only for the applicants but for the community so they understand what the policies are and for the planners who are processing the cases. But it's a big endeavor and the county of Ventura just undertook that and I think we're just finishing up that process now.
So it's certainly something that the board will need to weigh in on as to whether or not that's a high priority for the board but I think there's benefit to it in the long term.
And if I can add, um, I would just say from a KPMG perspective. It, um, I would agree it comes down to the prioritization. I wouldn't say it's the first endeavor with regards to long-range planning that should be implemented but I do think that it adds workload for internal staff at the moment and also creates delays and confusion for the customers as well And so there is a benefit both internally and externally to implementing this change, but it may not be the first recommendation that you implement in terms of priorities.
Thank you. The first recommendation for the Energy Minerals and Compliance Division was about realigning business units to reflect core functions, and really what this related to is about KPMG had recommended that we move permit compliance and code enforcement back into development review and We're not supporting the recommendation at this time. Well, there may be some merit to that We did make a change I wasn't here at the time in 2018 we assessed what was happening with all of our compliance and enforcement related activities in develop in P&D and determined that we sort of we had some inconsistencies and Because those divisions of petroleum compliance and code enforcement and permit compliance were in different divisions, all three of them.
And in the review that had been done we believed that consolidating And I think it's important to understand that the operations under one deputy and manager would provide for a more consistent. Execution of those duties, and I believe that has happened. There's not to say there isn't merit in the recommendation that they made, but we would have to look at that in a broader context of looking The creation of the cannabis team, the Division of Development Review has a lot of responsibilities now. And I think taking that piece out and putting it back in there is not something we think is the right thing to do at this moment in time but could be at some future point.
And then, with respect to automating and create the allocation of code enforcement complaints in Acela. That's really what this is tied to. And part of the problem we have right now with the system that we have with Acela is that this would not allow us to maintain the confidentiality of the people who are filing the complaints. And that's pretty fundamental to our program here at the county.
support this change right now. But as we move into the more expanded services that Acela could provide, we would talk with the company about whether or not it's possible to preserve that element in our code enforcement and allow it to be done online. But right now, it just isn't compatible with the program that has been supported by the Board of Supervisors.
And then lastly, integrating GIS into the allocation and prioritization of work. We agree with that. We are currently using that now. There's some aspect of using GIS for some of the petroleum inspections That we can't do because some of those items are not addressed. And so it's a little bit challenging, but for the most part we agreed with that recommendation and are already using it and moving further in that direction.
And with that, that concludes my presentation and I'm happy to talk further about any of these particular recommendations and our response to them and
Thank you, Miss Plowman. It's really reassuring to know you're in such alignment with the KPMG study and that you're moving ahead with the timetable to implement the recommendations and we're ahead of them in many cases before the review. Supervisor Williams?
Well I just wanted to of course just implore you of the importance and it's something I've done with you many times and I think you understand fully the importance It's been a pleasure to serve on this committee. The department being a great place to work, too. That's an important element of this. You have a lot of young employees that could be incredible resources and could have a career as planners if the department is both a good place to work and a pleasant place to work.
And so I want to implore the importance of these changes, but also the importance of morale and it as a learning environment and supportive environment because all of the policy priorities that the board wants to implement is dependent upon your department working well.
5:09 – 5:1116 turns
Any other comments from board members? Are there any requests to speak on this item?
Chair Hart, Members of the Board we have no requests to speak on this item.
Mr. Chair I do have one comment. Supervisor
Lavenino?
I think it's always nice to remember when we have these KPMG presentations. It's a broader concept, this is something our CEO took as part of her big Renew 22. And personally when, I know we all get these personal visits from KPMG and the CEO. I find more information about these departments and their inner workings, I really think it does us a really good service to pull back the curtain every once in awhile and take a look at these. I know we're going to do all of them within a short period of time, but I find this exercise to be money very well spent and I also really appreciate Department heads ability, it's not always good. It doesn't always feel great to have somebody looking over your shoulder telling you can do something a little bit better.
So it takes a special person to be able to look at that and say okay I can find room for improvement there so. I just wanted to give the CEO a high five on that one thanks
Thank you for that. I think we all share your view, that this is really helpful and I think it's empowering for the department heads to have that extra eyes on what they're doing because a lot of times it confirms that they're doing a really good job so thank you. Anything else on this item? Would somebody like to make a motion?
I move staff recommendation A through C in our board letter of 82520
Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Second. Motion's been made and seconded. Any more discussion? Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll?
Ms. Hartman? Aye Mr. Adam?
Aye.
Mr. Lavinino?
Aye.
Mr Williams? Aye Chair Hart?
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
That brings us to department item number five would the clerk please read this item into the record
5:11 – 5:2622 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board. Departmental item number five is from Community Services. It is a hearing to receive and file the Commission for Women 2020 Women's History Month Service Awards presentation.
Mr. Chapchin, good afternoon. Welcome Chair Hart and members of the board it's a pleasure to be here my role really is to simply introduce the folks who are part of the Women's Commission or Commission for Women but first I want to introduce Eva Camarena you may not know her she replaced Natasha as a staff person for the Commission on Women And she's doing a great job. And we've had this commission for about a year now, maybe a year and a half, and it's been a pleasure working with this dynamic group of women on a variety of issues affecting women. So with that I know they are on a Zoom call. I'd like to introduce Yvette Peralta who is the outgoing chair. And Yvette's going to introduce the video and also some of the members of the commission.
Welcome Chair Peralta. This is kind of a unique way to do the presentation I see the question.
Hi, I'm Suzanne Peck. I'm a commissioner and I'm speaking instead of Yvette. Yvette and several of our commissioners are working women and we thought we were on this morning they had to leave and so sorry but everybody sent me their notes. So Tracy Beard and I are the two commissioners who are still on the zoom call And we're really happy to be here. We really appreciate your support for the Women's Equality Day resolution that you talked about last week, adjournment of the meeting and we're excited to show the film I think the films already loaded in can we show the awards ceremony bill?
Welcome to the 2020 Commission for Women's Service Awards. My name is Yvette Peral and I'm the chairperson of the Santa Barbara County Commission for Women. My pronouns are she, her, hers. Thank you for joining us we have a great ceremony for you honoring five women Les damos la bienvenida a la ceremonia de premios por su servicio 2020. Mi nombre es Iver Peralta y mi pronombre es ella. Soy presidenta de la Comisión de Mujeres del Condado de Santa Barbara. Gracias por acompañarnos. Pueden activar los subtítulos en español para ver esta ceremonia virtual. Espero la disfruten!
There are many outstanding organizations that help shape Santa Barbara County, particularly those that advocate for women. To recognize, honor and celebrate the achievements of these organizations and individuals, the Santa Barbara County Commission for Women established the annual Service Awards in 1998. The award recipients demonstrate their commitment and service to the community year-round And we take pride in shining the spotlight on them. We also recognize the commissioners from each district for their dedication to promote the well-being and equal status of girls and women in Santa Barbara County. So let's get our celebration started! Representing the 1st District with County Supervisor Das Williams, we have Victoria Juarez, Charlotte Gallup Moore, and Judy Weisbord.
I now turn it over to Judy to present our first award recipient.
Hello, my name is Judy Weisbart and I'm a Commissioner for the First District for the Women's Commission of Santa Barbara County along with two other commissioners for the first district Victoria Juarez and Charlotte Gallop Moore. We work under the Supervisor Das Williams and are grateful for this position to help women and girls in our community tonight we are here to honor a dear friend and an amazing woman who works very hard for that goal in Santa Barbara.
That's Barbara Ben-Horan, the CEO of Girls Inc. of Santa Barbara County. Girls Inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart and bold. And that's what we love. We love the fact that their programs are partnering with the schools and affiliated organizations, and they focus on developing the whole girl with a combination of mentoring relationships to equip them to be leaders in the future and to break the cycle of poverty and be role models in their community. We hope that one of those girls one day will be a commissioner for Santa Barbara County, and we thank Barbara for all the work that she is doing for us.
Congratulations, Barbara!
Hello my name is Barbara Bin-Horin and I am the CEO of Girls Inc. of Greater Santa Barbara I'd like to thank the County Board of Supervisors and the Commission for Women for selecting me and Girls Inc. to receive the First District Commission for Women Service Award. Girls Inc holds the vision of empowered girls in an equitable society, and this vision is well aligned with commission's work to promote the well-being and equal status of women in Santa Barbara County.
We are one of 86 affiliates in a network across the United States and Canada And our mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold. We are advocates for girls and young women, and we deliver life-changing programs to close to 1500 girls and teens in Santa Barbara and Goleta each year. And we believe that every one of them has the power to change the world.
Thank you again.
And now, representing the 2nd District with County Supervisor Greg Hart. We have Suzanne Peck, Anna Everett and Margs Fitzwilliam. Anna will introduce our second award recipient.
Hello! I'm Dr. Anna Everett and I'm a Commissioner with the Santa Barbara County Commission for Women, 2nd District. And on behalf of our Supervisor Greg Hart my fellow commissioners Suzanne Peck and Margaret Fitzwilliam I want to congratulate Kiana Brodnax, who is our Community Service Awards recipient for this year. Kiana Brodnax has done so much in the community but founding the Santa Barbara Young Black Professionals has meant so much for an underrepresented group.
We have a proclamation on our website that we hope you will take a look at for the details, but let me just share a quick remembrance. In 2018, Kiana Broadnax was able to get us an advanced screening of the hugely successful Black Panther movie. She asked us to wear African-inspired attire which we all did. It was a huge success, very well attended and one that I won't soon forget so Kiana congratulations! We are so proud of you and thank you for all you do in the community
Thank you Greg Hart of the Second District. Thank you to Santa Barbara Women's Commission, especially Anna Everett for nominating me for this award and for her and Charlotte Moore's continued support over the years. And thank you to my mom for instilling the importance of community service from a young age. And like many people in Santa Barbara, I came here to UCSB and loved it. Loved the area but I found that something was missing and so that led me to found Santa Barbara Young Black Professionals in 2016. It has been such a rewarding experience to be a part of creating a safe space in Santa Barbara.
Creating new opportunities for others and just seeing people flourish And so I just want to thank you guys for acknowledging the importance of not only diversity, but inclusion and how it enhances the already great community that we live in. Thank you.
On the third district with County Supervisor Joan Hartmann, we have Commissioner and Vice Chair Karen Steinwalz, Liliana Cardenas, and Marianne Partridge. Liliana will introduce our third award recipient.
This recipient has devoted their service to bettering the lives of Isla Vista residents and UCSB students. They spearhead the Give Isla Vista program, which ultimately enhances the quality of life for the community. They lead civic engagement through their work with overseeing and coordinating nonpartisan voter registration and census for the Isla Vista and UCSB communities.
Outside of this work they also provide Spanish translation to community organizations It is with great pleasure that the 3rd District Commission for Women recognize Dr. Viviana Marzano.
Thank you very much to the commissioners of the 3rd District Commission on Women and Supervisor Joan Hartman for this recognition. Definitely an unexpected surprise! This work is not done in isolation but with the help of dozens of civically engaged university students, staff and faculty and hundreds of volunteers in Isla Vista mainly the Latinx community. In these trying and disturbing times, we have to continue this work to increase the number of young people who get out to the polls. To ensure that our hard-to-count populations are included in the census so that our communities get the funding that they need and deserve. And most urgently, we need to guarantee that the voice of the vulnerable and marginalized are heard and present in our communities, in our state and local agencies, and most importantly, in our schools.
Thanks again!
And now representing the 4th District with County Supervisor Peter Adam, we have Tami Raska. She will introduce our next award recipient. Welcome Tami.
I'd like to introduce Nohemi Ornelas from the Hancock College. She's Assistant Superintendent for Student Services, is that correct? Yes, correct. And she is the 4th District Supervisor's choice for the Commission for Women Service Awards for 2019-20 and we wanted to shine a spotlight on her for her commitment and dedication I'd like to introduce Noemi and have her tell us a little bit about herself.
arena for helping women in our community. Thank you, Naomi.
Thank you. Thank you Tammy for this recognition. This is a real great honor not only to be recognized in the county that I've lived lived in my entire life but also as a role model for our future women out there. This is such a memorable moment for those females that are out there and hopefully it'll be encouraging to know that there are so many opportunities For you to give back to your community and education is an opportunity to pave that way in being an advocate for other females. So I'm very honored and privileged to have received this award, and I appreciate all of the recognition.
And last but not least, we have Commissioner Tracy Beard, Allison Wells and myself representing the 5th District with County Supervisor Steve Lavagnino. Tracy, tell us all about the 5th District award recipient.
Hi, I'm Tracy Beard. I am honored to be here today and welcome you to the Santa Barbara County Service Awards for the Women's Commission on behalf of the 5th District. I work for Steve Lavinino along with Allison Wells and Yvette, our host who you've met earlier today. We are here to honor Sandy Blair on behalf of Operation WEPS. Sandy builds tiny homes for our community, for women coming out of the service that are homeless.
We want to congratulate Sandy for all her work she's done for women in our community and for the suffrage of women that are homeless. So let's take a moment and honor Sandy today on behalf of our 5th District and the community of Santa Barbara County. Sandy you've done a great job thank you so much
It's an honor to be here today to receive this award by the Commission for Women in Santa Barbara County. I am so grateful for this honor and could not have achieved it without the support of all our local businesses, our veteran service organizations, our nonprofits and our entire community here on the Central Coast. We've serviced six female veterans and provided them housing over this past year. And to date four of the six are moving into their permanent housing apartments on the central coast here. And I'm so grateful to be receiving this award and for this recognition because without our community, our organization would not be able to achieve such great feats as we have this past year. So thank you!
Now it's a pleasure to introduce to you a video from our County Supervisors for our five award recipients.
Hello my name is Das Williams your First District County Supervisor If you want to change the world, there's nothing more important than mentoring the next generation. And that is why it is such an honor for me on behalf of the Board of Supervisors to congratulate Barbara Ben-Horan and Girls Inc., being named a County Commissioned for Women's Service Award recipient.
For me, to see how many young girls go into Girls Inc. and come out as empowered Smart, educated young women is such an inspiration and shows the work is to be supported and congratulated. Thank you so much. Don't stop and keep on helping us change the world.
Congratulations Kiana Brodnax for receiving the County Commission for Women's 2020 Community Service Award. As a student leader and as co-founder and past president of the Santa Barbara Young Black Professionals, and as an outstanding county employee you have led the fight for racial justice in our community. I want to thank you from all the county employees and my colleagues on the Board of Supervisors for your outstanding work as a community leader in the fight for racial justice in our county.
5:26 – 5:3611 turns
Viviana is a beloved institution in our community. She's the face that connects UCSB to the broader community. She makes the mundane, things like voter registration, census participation, even the cast-off goods repurposed absolutely compelling. When she walks into a room you just feel the temperature rise She makes you happy. Her smile just makes you smile and she's someone who makes us kinder to one another and want to join her in working on behalf of the public good. She is an architect of the beloved community in Isla Vista.
First of all, I'd like to thank the Commission for Women for taking the time to create this presentation knowing we could not commend these honorees in person I appreciate all of your hard work and time you have put into the commission. Thank you. Now, I'd like to personally congratulate Dr. Noemi Ornelas on being selected as the 2020 Commission for Women's Service Award recipient for the Fourth District.
Not only did you grow up in the Fourth District and continue your education locally but you have chosen to stay within your community which benefits your family, friends, neighbors and those closest to you. Your commitment to all students over the past several years has not gone unnoticed and you should be recognized for the dedication you've shown while fostering growth to our Central Coast education system. Congratulations and keep up the good work!
Congratulations Sandy, everything you're doing with Operations Web for our women veterans. Just want to congratulate you on being recognized by our Commission for Women. Can't think of anybody in our community that's doing more for women than you are. Just keep doing what you're doing, keep that positive mental attitude, stay humble I know you always will so again congratulations and I wish you nothing but the best
Thank you to our supervisors for their messages, and thank you for watching this meaningful ceremony. We hope that you leave inspired by the work of the amazing and dedicated women recognized this year 2020. Gracias a todas las personas que se han tomado el tiempo de ver esta significativa ceremonia. Esperamos que se inspiren por el trabajo de las asombrosas y dedicadas mujeres que han sido reconocidas este año 2020.
Muchas gracias. Thank you everybody for watching, goodbye. Good
afternoon Chair Hart and supervisors I hope you enjoyed the video is my audio on?
Yes Suzanne you're coming through loud and clear thank you
Oops, oh I think you just muted yourself. Yeah
good okay
yes
good okay so Yvette Peralta sorry she couldn't be here this afternoon but you saw her on video when we found out we were not going to be able to have the in-person award ceremony of course we were disappointed we always enjoyed having that reception and having you the recipients and give hugs to everybody. But given COVID we got creative, we produced the video with the help of a local production company and Yvette was the executive producer and everybody contributed. Yvette wrote the script but the commissioners all reached out to the award recipients and the supervisors who were all gracious to send in excellent 60 second video clips and some of the award recipients went into the studio and follow the safety protocols for social distancing.
And some sent them in from home, but we want to share this on our website. We're so proud of these women and the work that's being done and watching people pivot to meet the goals that we have in terms of supporting our community. So during the next few minutes, we want to give you a quick update on some of the things that we're doing now. This is not our annual for a report to the Board of Supervisors. That'll be later in the year, but a lot is going on. I wanted to give you a very quick update on two things personally have been working on CEDAW and Pass The Mic.
Pass The Mic you know is the film series, the short documentaries 15 teens talk about sex that are being used in the schools to teach about gender and sexuality and health care resources. We've now had two community meetings Chair Hart, you were the first one at the County Health Department. We held a second one at the main library in February just before COVID to not only show pass the mic but to bring in a panel of health care experts to talk to parents about sex ed and about reproductive health care rights and about keeping their kids informed and safe so that panels were great we had Dr. Bondo Renoso, Dr. Lynn Fitzgibbons Professor Rebecca Rios from UCSB and Suzanne Grimacy.
Fortunately, we filmed one at the library because COVID happened right after that. So now what we're doing is editing that film video with our healthcare experts on past the mic and translating it into Spanish and making it available on a much shorter version to be used throughout the county. And we're excited in terms of distribution not only the school district But Planned Parenthood and Pacific Pride and UCSB and AHA, and all the after school programs are interested in this content in terms of promoting sexual health. So that's past the mic. The second topic I wanted to give you a quick update on is CEDAW. CEDAW as you know, C-E-D-A-W stands for the United Nations Convention to End Discrimination Against Women.
The County of Santa Barbara, as you recall passed a CEDAW ordinance. I'm sorry, a CEDAW resolution two years ago. We had the CEDAW resolution for the county and since then we've been speaking with the cities and the city councils up and down the county for the cities to pass CEDAAW resolutions. I am happy to report that I worked with Paul Perotti and Goleta unanimously passed a Cedaw resolution Santa Maria passed, Guadalupe passed, Santa Barbara passed. So we've gone up and down the county to get CEDAW resolutions. Now it's time for an ordinance. And if you remember from CEDAW there's one phrase I want to read to you. Adherence to CEDAAW will promote equal access to and equity in health care, economic development, educational opportunities, employment opportunities for women as well as address the critical problem of violence against women.
So that's why it's important we think for us to move forward and keep working on CEDAW. And now that we have CEDAW resolutions up and down the county, and on behalf of the county, we would love to work with the county for a CEDAAW ordinance. Tracy has some thoughts on the urgency and actions and why it will be important for us to work on a CEDAW ordinance, so I want to turn it over to Tracy at this point to give you a little bit more on that. Tracy?
Hello, CDAW is passed as a city ordinance in over 600 cities in the USA. The 1995 UN Conference for Women re-energized the feminist and women's movement. When participation came home, they asked themselves what can we do to make a difference in our community? In 1996, a group of human service activists worked with the city officials of San Francisco who adopted CEDAW as a legal binding ordinance. Although President Carter signed CEDAW it was not ratified by Congress but that did not stop our activists In San Francisco, this citizen held action supports our mayors, our city councils with amazing bold action. It was the first time in the UN history that a human rights treaty was adopted as law at the local level. In 1998, San Francisco became the first city to adopt CEDAW as a UN treaty for the elimination and discrimination against women as a city ordinance.
This is an ordinance that runs from top to bottom with platforms for mayors, for women's commissioners, civil society stakeholders, youth women, girls. This is a time for us to rally together and end gender-based discrimination violence against women and men. The campaign also has really impacted the city and the finances for Los Angeles since 2014, and it's successfully working. Our goal is to work for equality for all, for CEDAW, to provide an excellent example of what can happen when we ratify it here in this community. I ask you all today to work for CEDAW, become an organist In Santa Barbara County in 2020 and in 2021, let's start the implementation of CEDAW. More than seven cities in this county have supported CEDAW. We at the Women's Commission are bringing this to you.
Our goal is to work with the Human Service Resource Office and our supervisors that a funding budget for social justice and equality our voters deserve Seedall, support the equality in Santa Barbara County. This is the seed for all of you that's just been planted. I am so happy to serve Steve Lavinino. I have served Joan Hartman for over four years and all the supervisors and we are one county together tomorrow. We have in Santa Maria, the League of Women Voters a drive-by celebration for the 100th anniversary for the right to vote from five to seven starting at the Minerva Club I thank you for the resolution you gave us today, for the Equality Day and the 100th anniversary of this suffrage of the right to vote. And it's a pleasure to serve you all.
5:36 – 5:4324 turns
Thank you, Tracy. And I'd like to add Judy Weisbart who had to go off the call organized and Doss, you were there and I can't remember who else was there but the supervisors all supported us. We organized the silent march on March 1st And Judy was instrumental in that. And then the following weekend, and this is also just before COVID, we supported and participated in the HER Festival at Gersh Park. So a lot's going on. And even though now we're locked down under COVID, we're doing all we can to promote our values of equality for women and support for women and children.
We'll be back to you before year end with an annual report Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting Again, really appreciate your support. Dear Heart in particular I've really enjoyed working for you and with you and anything that we can do to support CEDAW, to support the Black Lives Matter movement, to support LGBTQ, anything in the community that impacts the well-being and security and safety and sanity of women and children.
We're here for you and we're here for all of us. Thank you.
Thank you Commissioner Peck and Commissioner Beard, and all of the Women's Commission members. We're disappointed too that you couldn't be here in person with us but having that video presentation and you on the line with Zoom is really spectacular. You did such a fabulous job putting that together. The award winners for doing all that outstanding work in our community on behalf of women. They're an incredible group of individuals, and I know you haven't even paused with the COVID pandemic in your work. You're figuring out ways to be creative and continue Pressing forward on the agenda that we all share for equality for women. And thank you for your leadership, thank you for your commitment to this issue. It's really a pleasure working with you as I know all my colleagues feel the same way and in fact love to hear from them as well.
Other supervisors like to make any comments? Supervisor
Williams Well it's a pleasure to march with you all in the March in White, the silent march. And we can celebrate this year as just a crucially important celebration of the right to vote and imperative and the need to vote. And I really appreciate the creativity of the awards presentation. Um, and I appreciate that you have featured such a wide breadth of the generations and uh, of the demographics of women's leadership in the county between the women's commissioners themselves and the awards recipients You covered enormous amount of ground between professions, demographics and ages that truly represents another generation of leadership in this county. So thank you for that.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well, I think it's obvious the Women's Commission is probably one of our more dynamic commissions in the county. And thank you for bringing so many great women and activities to our attention. I'd also like to just acknowledge the service of Liliana Cardenas and Mary Ann Partridge both of whom served on the Women's Commission for the Third District and have resigned. So I really appreciate their service.
Just a thank you
to, yeah my full compliment of commissioners. Fifth District has no vacancies I think every year I've had to incur the wrath of the other commissioners as it came forward so I want to thank all those that are serving and I think it's really cool that I might have the youngest commissioner Yvette is the chairperson and I was really blown away with the quality of the of the video presentation, I think it was awesome. I watched it last night and was really surprised at how well the quality came across so congratulations to all the winners.
Thank you to Tammy Grabska and I think she's my loan commissioner and congratulations to Dr. Arnalas.
And thank you Chair Peralta for all the work that you've done this year. You did a fabulous job as the emcee of the awards, it couldn't have been done better by the Academy Awards and I imagine Commissioner Peck had something to do with the production quality of that presentation and it really showed so thank you Suzanne.
Team effort yeah. Thank you very much.
Well we look forward to your annual presentation of the work at the Commission later this year.
Thank you all very much.
And do we have a motion to receive and file this report? So moved, second motions been made in second. And before I jump to that roll call, do we have any public comments on the Senate
chair heart members of the board? I'd just like to note for the record we had no request to
speak. OK, thank you. Madam Clerk, would you please call the rule
Miss Hartman Mr Adam?
Hi
Mr Lavinino.
Hi
Mr Williams hi Chair Hartman
I
motion passes unanimously.
Thank you again commissioners
the next item is department item number six would you clerk please read that item into the record?
5:43 – 5:585 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board departmental item number six is from community services, it is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a library ad hoc committee update
Mr.
Chapman, welcome back. You have places in the room?
Yes, good afternoon members of the board, Chair Hart. Before I introduce Ryder though, I do want to say a few words about the ad hoc committee. What I'd like to do is introduce the ad hoc committee members. It's been about a year, year and a half since we've all been working together. Great minds in this room. I think they've done a tremendous amount of work, a tremendous job with the ad hoc committee's work.
To start you know the four librarians Mary Hauser from Santa Maria, Sarah Bly from Lompoc, what's her name? Allison Gray from Goleta. Oh, I'm mixing it up. Anyway, Jessica Cadiente from Santa Barbara. Also Judith Dale who represents the LAC and also Patricia Sealy who represents Friends of. I would like to thank them and also thank you Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Williams for taking an active role in this ad hoc committee. So with that, I'd like to turn it over to Ryder.
Mr. Bailey? Thank you George, and good afternoon Supervisors. Today you'll receive an update on the work of the Library Ad Hoc Committee. During today's presentation I will cover work completed to date and our potential next steps. Staff's recommendations are as follows. To receive this update, to strive for the minimum standards for libraries that were developed by the Ad Hoc Committee and unanimously approved by the Library Advisory Committee, that's on slide 12.
Direct staff to work with cities towards funding this level of service for all branch libraries. Provide direction on a potential phase three of the ad hoc committee, which could include exploring funding options and improved governance model and or other direction. And lastly, to determine if these actions are not subject to CEQA. Now I'll start with a brief overview of our countywide library system.
Our 50 plus year city-county partnership is unique and complex. The county contracts annually with four cities and their municipal libraries to administer nine branch libraries. Four of those nine branches are in smaller cities, and receive some city funding in addition to the per capita funding. The remaining five branches are in unincorporated areas and have no other public funding source.
All libraries are available to residents within and outside their cities. All libraries participate in and share circulation across the Black Gold Cooperative library system. The county's $7.80 per capita funding is unchanged since fiscal year 2015-16, and as costs rise, so do deficits and requests for one time funding keep libraries open. A brief background on the Library Ad Hoc Committee.
This was established by your board in October 2018, in response to repeated requests for one-time funding to fill budget gaps. Its purpose was to outline a path to achieve a sustainable and equitable finance and governance system for county libraries. Its members as George just thanked are two County Board Supervisors, the four library directors in the county, Judith Dale, Pat Saley, and George Chapchin. It was facilitated by a legacy group.
A chart of the progress of the Library Ad Hoc Committee, and I will go into each phase in further detail on this in following slides. Initially we gathered information to ensure that we were all working with the same facts and level of understanding. We established branch categories and from that set minimum standards for service levels. We then estimated those costs to meet those standards.
Future phases could include exploring outside funding, revisiting the existing model to address equity standards and ECOLA. A future phase could also cover governance to support collaboration and sustainability. An initial task of the committee was to establish our guiding principles which were used to get the committee on the same page in working towards an agreed upon goal.
All residents in the Santa Barbara County deserve access to library services. Those service levels vary by community needs and library type. Equity requires consideration of population and other issues. Core operations should be funded by public revenue sources, while friends, foundations, volunteers, grants, and public-private partnerships should be activated for expanded services.
Libraries should have secure and sufficient resources to meet community needs Support services provided by main libraries enhance our branch libraries. Library decision making should enable flexibility for library directors as well as transparency, accountability and opportunities for input from the community. Increased collaboration and coordination in terms of budgets, library organization and programming will have system wide benefits.
Our initial phase of work ran from January 2019 to May 2019 And during that time, we established our purpose and our guiding principles that I just went over. We embarked on a fact-finding mission to identify challenges and information gaps. And the immediate priority was to address the 2019-20 budget deficits. And if you recall, we recommended a strategy to fill those gaps by leveraging city and friends group contributions.
Key findings were that our libraries are valued and valuable. They serve an important core community function. Our libraries are underfunded relative to California and U.S. libraries, and there is nowhere left to cut but open hours. Our library system's governance and financial models are complex. There is no easy solution. And that additional work is needed on equity, revenue, and governance.
The second phase ran from July 2019 to May 2020 and established working groups to dive deep into the following categories. The Benchmarking Working Group was created to establish realistic and equitable standards for library service. The Funding Working Group was created to identify the most feasible option for increasing public revenue for the countywide library system.
Under Public-Private Partnerships, initial conversations to explore philanthropy and partnerships as potential additional revenue sources. The Ad Hoc Benchmarking Working Group was formed to establish realistic, equitable standards for library service under current and future funding scenarios. To provide a framework for equity-based decision making. Communicate a shared vision of quality public libraries and library services.
Help communities understand what to expect at different sized branches. To assist libraries in short and long term planning and the prioritization of services and provide a driving mechanism for the support of libraries. I'll go over this a little bit deeper in the next few slides. In researching how to categorize our branch libraries, the benchmarking group reviewed data from the California State Library, four counties similar to Santa Barbara in terms of population, geography, number of branches. Those were Ventura, Sonoma, San Luis Obispo and Monterey. We also reviewed library standards from 12 other states and had conversations with library directors and a library consultant.
The benchmarking working group worked collaboratively to categorize libraries based on population Density and proximity to a main library. On this chart, the main libraries are listed across the top. That's Santa Barbara, Lompoc, Santa Maria and Goleta. Next our county branches were categorized into the following categories. Medium sized would be Carpentria and Orchid.
Small two, Montecito, Guadalupe, Buelton and Solvang. And small ones, Vandenberg Village, Los Alamos and Cuyama. The standards that were evaluated were staffing levels, open hours, collections, programming and outreach technology and facilities. Now there's a lot of information on this slide so bear with me in the next few slides we'll let you will inform you where our branches land in comparison to these minimum standards.
So these standards were developed for the branches not the main libraries and no case would the mains fall below these standards. The minimum standards being recommended are as follows. For staffing, having two paid staff persons in the library at a time. For a medium size that would include a professional librarian and for a small and a full-time lead at small twos.
For hours it'd be a minimum of 42 hours at medium sized branches, 32 hours at small twos, and at least 25 hours at small ones. For collections we'd be looking at spending at least $2 per capita For programming, at a minimum you would have youth summer reading programs at all branches with additional programming at larger branches. For technology we would implement a five year replacement cycle for equipment and at facilities we would like to provide additional funding for the two branches that pay rent, improve safety and security, and perform at least annual deep cleans.
Here is a high level summary of how the libraries are compared to the committee's recommendations. The yellow highlighted cells are where our libraries fall short of those minimum standards that were recommended by the ad hoc. This next slide is the same with costs overlaid. The highest cost is due to staffing and open hours. In summary, the cost to meet the ad hoc's recommendations is $642,000.
In recent years, the countywide library system has been strained due to rising costs and lack of funding. With little to no reserves remaining, only the approval of repeated one-time funding has kept the system at current levels. This was the basis of the second working group tasked with identifying the most feasible option for increasing public revenue to the system with the aim to protect and enhance library services supplementing the existing per capita funding Identify dedicated funding for libraries to provide predictability and long-term sustainability. To reduce the need for private sources to cover core operations, support unincorporated branch libraries that have limited resources available, and to improve equity in access to library services.
This working group explored a number of options as to seeking your board's direction as to which option you would like us to explore further, if any in a phase three. For scale we considered countywide or sub-county should the direction be to proceed with countywide it could address equity issues by raising funds system wide. It also acknowledges the fact that library users depend on the whole system and not just their local library.
However, countywide would be challenging to gain broad-based support as the support for libraries and acceptance of taxes varies widely across the county. Should the direction be subcounty it would allow local users who want enhanced library services to tax themselves to increase library funding. Now this may be potentially quicker and easier to pass than a countywide measure but it could widen the gap rather than address inequities in service delivery between the zones.
For designation, we considered a special tax specifically for libraries or a general tax which could be intended for libraries but would likely also be shared across other needs. A special tax requires a higher threshold of voters to pass and that would be designated for libraries. A general tax requires a lower bar and that would go into the county's General Fund and be used for libraries and potentially other needs depending on how the measure is written.
For type, we considered a parcel or property tax much like Measure L and CSA 3 or sales tax. And for coverage, we considered whether or not to include cities or just the unincorporated areas. The funding working group evaluated revenue potential of a parcel or sales tax. There are over 123,000 parcels in the county however some would likely be exempt. The revenue generated would be the amount of the assessment multiplied by the number of non-exempt parcels.
For unincorporated sales tax, we estimate a quarter of a cent would generate roughly 1.9 million in the unincorporated areas. A half-cent would be double that to 3.8. A full cent would be 7.6 million. Now if the sales tax were to include cities much like Measure A for transportation, that amount would be much higher. Should your board provide direction for the ad hoc committee to continue work exploring potential funding options, we would assess the need and feasibility of a measure to fund libraries.
Determine the best option to pursue given the current reality and timing. And we would look to the community to gauge support for the measure via public polling and to build that support for the measure via a campaign. Onto public-private partnerships. Preliminary conversations and research on public-private partnerships has begun. Legacy Works reached out to potential partners to assess the merit of more intensive work, engaging a broader base of funders. This could be explored further in a future phase of the community's work.
Examples would be collaboration with other county agencies seeking grants specifically for underserved communities. Philanthropy with most promising being supportive capital improvements or potential support for polling and plural funding models that would diversify revenue sources. What we found in our initial conversations was that there is clear potential for public-private partnerships to support county libraries meeting minimum and future standards.
Further work is required, perhaps as an ad hoc committee working group, to identify, assess, and prioritize opportunities, and that realizing this potential would benefit from a coordinated systemwide strategic planning and fundraising. Any work in this arena would need to recognize existing resistance to alternative funding. Looking forward, future phases at your direction could include more work on funding, potential dedicated revenue sources and public-private partnerships.
Under governance the committee has identified several areas where the current model presents challenges and can be improved. We'd seek to identify ways to improve collaboration and efficiency within the system by clarifying funding, decision-making and advisory roles, updating the annual countywide agreement, a maintenance effort between our city partners, and to consider pros and cons of alternative governance models.
Thank you for your time and your attention. That concludes my presentation, once again here are today's recommended actions for your consideration. Thank you Mr. Bailey for the report.
5:58 – 6:0710 turns
Mr. Jepson? And Chair Hart I do believe Carl Palmer, Carrie Capo and Megan Miley from the Legacy Group are available in case you have any questions for them as well.
Are there any comments from the folks on the Zoom line? Any questions for staff? From board members. Supervisor Williams.
Well, to me one of the biggest takeaways of the past of the trials and trivials in the last few years of maintaining services at the libraries has been the necessity of looking this is a shared burden And while I definitely support getting us to minimum service levels as articulated in the ad hoc, I think it's going to necessitate some conversations with our cities.
If COVID hadn't happened, we may have had the ability to do this unilaterally. But I think both for the purpose of sustainability and now with COVID just for the ability to get there to minimum standards, I think we're going to have to ask cities to do it with us. And so I hope that we would, in the short run, direct staff to talk to the cities about how we could use this as a aspirational goal to accomplish in next year's funding.
In the long run, I hope that we would look at the fact You know, it's kind of pitiful. Even such bastions of radicalism as Santa Maria have higher sales tax than we do and you know it seems like that is something that we ought to be looking at in the long run.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well, I thought I would at least put this in context in terms of my own growth and understanding. Initially we came to libraries and there's no issue really that I think people are more passionate about than libraries and community libraries and some of that spilled over even up here on the dais. We did then have the report that was done by an outside consultant and that report, one of the takeaways I came with was that well gee we'll just, the county can do the unincorporated and the cities can do theirs. But as you get into it, and that's kind of how it works with parks but you get into it and it's really much more complicated than that and And the county's role, I think in the past has been to pass through money so that unincorporated residents can use libraries in the cities.
I use Santa Barbara's library. I use Buellton's, Solvang's, Santa Maria, great library. I like to have the coffee up there when I am on jury duty or some other thing that I have to do. So anyway, libraries are a shared responsibility. And a lot of people say, well gee libraries we don't need them in the age of computers but that really isn't true at all. What what we find is that they are community centers they are places where people come together and tutoring and programming and learning if you don't have a computer at home You have access and you can also learn how to use it. So libraries are really extremely important for our communities, especially for some of the disadvantaged people in our communities who don't have a lot of books, magazines, newspapers or computers in their homes.
That was, we came with the heads of the libraries in the different cities and I think they have really come into this and given it their all. They are professionals, they have had each somewhat different experiences in their different cities, different support in terms of their city or county jurisdiction But this was all on top of additional work and so I really think they did heroic, Yeoman's work. And Judith Dale and Pat Saley as well. There is a love of libraries.
One of the things that was extremely helpful and where they really delved in was these benchmarks. What do you do at different libraries? What should you do at the bigger libraries, the smaller libraries and the really small and the twigs, the branch libraries and the twigs? And that was helpful because we can't do everything at every library so being able to have some way that we'd research to figure out what's appropriate at different levels. And these are sort of minimal levels, they're not the Cadillac version this is really a very minimal version of what So, I just wanted to put that all in context and say that Legacy Works had quite a job with us because there was a lot of distrust and we didn't have a shared understanding. And George and Ryder were terrific in shepherding this along so you know, I just wanted to put that context in it how much I have grown in this process and how I thank everybody who's contributed to that And I'll save the rest of my comments for later.
Thank you for that. Any other questions or comments from staff? I had a question, in the report you referenced that our library system is underfunded relative to California and U.S. libraries. Do you have anything that can put that into context how much and what ways are you measuring
Chair, I do yes. The average in our system is $32. The average for the state is $38. It really does vary pretty widely within our system as high as 62 with Santa Barbara and as low for some of the unincorporated ones just barely over the 780 that we contribute for the per capita they have some donations some fines are collected but it's well below the 32 dollar state average So it does
vary wildly within the county structure. Okay, thank you. Well I just want to express my thanks and gratitude to Supervisors Williams and Hartman for digging into this and really spending the time to clarify the issues. And for all of the folks on the ad hoc committee who've been working in bringing their professional expertise. Mr. Bailey, Mr. Chapchin both for shepherding this. It really does help us to understand how complex the system is and how different and decentralized it is. And it would be wonderful to have minimum standards of staffing and technology and investments in the resources.
So this is an aspirational document that's gonna require everybody to continue to collaborate and work together. And I think that is what the staff recommendation essentially is. Supervisor Williams. Yeah, I
would just Move staff recommendation if there isn't a further comment but with the specific directive to be working with our cities and friends groups to see What proposal can be made as a shared burden for next year's budget?
Thank you for that motion. Is there a second? This is the staff recommendation.
6:07 – 6:1018 turns
I will second and hope there's a little more discussion, and we have public comment?
I don't know if we do have any public comment.
Chair Hart, members of the commission, we have no request to speak on this item.
So now is the time for discussion. Motion has been made and seconded. Would folks like to make any additional comments to the motion?
Well, I think there's so much economic uncertainty right now that actually pursuing a tax, I don't really see that in the cards right now. But I do think all the other options should be on the table. Are there opportunities to co-locate services? I do think that the governance model can be further developed even without a clear strategy. The way that it works is it seems to come to the county in the budget process, and then we try to get the cities to ante up.
And I think it would be helpful if we could get to something where the cities and the county were together and talked about this instead of just leaving it to our community services to have to negotiate these arrangements. And I mean, I think again, I just want to emphasize. I believe that this was largely passed through. We don't have a lot of expertise in library services and I think the community service department has developed an enormous amount in a very short period of time. And now how do we bring that together with the other jurisdictions and the friends and keep this moving forward? So that would be my suggestion.
Any other comments to the motion? Any more discussion. Okay, Madam Clerk would you please call the roll and we also have item 816 that we trailed from the administrative agenda that we'll get to after this.
Ms. Hartman. Aye. Mr. Adam.
Aye.
Mr Lavinino.
Aye
Mr Williams.
Aye
Chair Hart.
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
which brings us to Item 816 Clerk, would you please read that item into the record?
Chair Hart and members of the board. Administrative Item number 16 is from Community Services. It is to consider recommendations regarding an agreement for operations of a countywide library system fiscal year 2020-2021. And I would like to remind the board we had no request to speak on this item.
Thank you. Is there a motion on this item?
6:10 – 6:118 turns
Move staff recommendation
Thank you. Second motion has been made and seconded any discussion. And there's no public comments so. Madam clerk could you please call the roll
miss Hartman. I Mister Adam. Mister Lavagnino. Mister Williams
I
chair heart
I
motion passes unanimously
and that concludes our business for today we will be adjourned until Tuesday September 1st 2020 thank