UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:03 – 0:0726 turns
Good morning I'll call to order the October 20th 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Would the clerk please call the roll?
Mr. Adam?
That's me, yes.
Mr. Lavagnino?
I'm
here.
Mr Williams? Here. Ms Hartman? Here Chair Hartman.
The next item of business is approval of the minutes from October 13th, 2020. Is there any discussion? Could someone make a motion?
Move approval.
Thank you. Second. Motion's been made and seconded. Any more discussion? Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?
Mr. Adam?
Aye.
Mr. Lavinino?
Aye.
Mr Williams? Aye Ms Hartman? Aye Chair Hart?
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
CEO Miyasato, is there a CEO report today?
No report this morning, Chair.
Thank you. And Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Hutt and members of the board I just have a couple quick announcements this morning. I would like to remind members of the public who are participating in today's meeting that although we are not allowing in-person participation we are allowing public comment by phone if you would like to make a comment by phone please call 805 I'd also like to remind members of the public who are participating by phone to please make every effort to be available and mute all streaming devices once it is your turn to speak.
My last announcement this morning is to inform the public and the board that we did receive a request to withdraw administrative item number 10 from the agenda today. This is from County Council, it is to consider recommendations regarding outside council contract with Nielsen, Merck-Sommer, Perrinello, Gross and Leone LLP there's a fourth this vote required on this item and we received to the request for withdrawal yesterday Monday October 19th and this information is available online and has been distributed to the board If we could just include that withdrawal with the balance of the administrative agenda today, that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Thank you Madam Clerk. Next item is approval of the administrative agenda. Do any board members request to pull any items on the administrative agenda? I know about A6 and I think A18. Are there others?
Nothing up here.
Okay thank you very much. Madam Clerk, would you please read item A-6 into the record?
Yes. And Chair Hart and members of the Board we did just receive a late request from a member of the public to speak on Administrative Item Number 10.
Thank you. A- 6
0:07 – 0:082 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board, administrative item number six is from community services. It is to consider recommendations regarding the approval of targeted outreach to homeless encampments in Santa Barbara County sub-recipient agreement using Emergency Solutions Grant CARES ESG-CV and CARES Act Funds Act of 2020 to include COVID-19 response.
Supervisor Williams? Well this is an important contract with CityNet An entity that has already been doing some outreach in the area. I'm sure in your districts, I know in some of your districts you have the same as I do which is increased homeless encampments both because of, I'm sure the economic conditions but also because The constraints on moving such camps, those have become more common.
And one of the tools that we have is outreach to those individuals to help get people off the streets. So I think this is really important. But the other part, of course it's only part of the puzzle, outreach. We need some place for them to get more And so this is why we need to continue the Project Room Keys South, which has been tremendously successful. Our staff has housed 43 individuals come off the streets and into the program.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
I think we need to continue this progress that we're making both in terms of outreach and Homeless individuals. So not a separate vote, but just thought it was important that people of the public knows about this effort. Thank you Supervisor Williams.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well, thank you for drawing that to our attention Supervisor Williams. I just wanted to add that CityNet gives a way of reaching out to the houseless population without having to use law enforcement. We're using them to see whether we can get people in the database, whether we can get people connected to services and they're doing extraordinary work particularly in Isla Vista.
Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Any other comments on this item? All right, let's go to Item A-10. We have a public speaker.
Chair Hart and members of the board. Administrative item number 10 was previously read into the record, but I will remind the public that this is from County Council. It is to consider recommendations regarding outside council contract with Nielsen, Merck-Sommer, Pernallo, Gross and Leone LLP. And there is a request to withdraw this item from members from the Department of County Council. And we have one request to speak on this item and it is Mark Shatillo.
Good morning, members of the board. This is Mark Shutillo and thank you for allowing me to speak on this item. I support the proposed withdrawal of this item for the quite important independent redistricting committee and their choice of council as we know this is a particularly important process in Santa Barbara County and with the passage of the initiative measure It's essential that the council and all of the apparatus associated with serving and supporting this committee be independent, be open, and be completely transparent.
We understand that there are potential affiliations between the proposed council and members of the commission that have been appointed so far that deserve further inquiry And as we review the conflict of interest provision within the contract itself and the breadth of the waivers are excessive in our mind. So, we would appreciate and do appreciate that County Council has pulled this item.
And we hope that there'll be an opportunity to secure a more appropriate firm and form of support for the districting committee. Thank you.
Mr. Chair?
Yes, Supervisor Adam.
Well I think we're owed much more explanation than we're getting here. What is the reason? What's the conflict?
Chair and supervisors, pulling up to 10,000 feet. My office had set this item up as a forfeits vote requirement intentionally not a majority vote so there'd be full support for whatever firm the board contracts with to provide independent legal counsel for the redistricting commission if at the time that counsel arrives which will not be Nielsen Merksimer, the Redistricting Commission which is a different council we would bring that back So that's my starting point on this.
We set it up as a four-fifths vote with the potential for litigation. It was clear that there was not a four-fifths vote on this item, so I withdrew the item. We've looked at 10 different firms. We'll bring back a different firm at a future meeting. This is one where in talking with the firm over the weekend and yesterday, the firm withdrew its offer to contract with the county. So I think that pretty much ends the story Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you Mr. Cozzone. Supervisor
Williams?
Just to flesh out the explanation, I will tell you Supervisor Adam, I passed along information that one of the firm's members had signed decently large checks for two supervisorial candidates and I thought that was important information and did pass that along.
Any other questions
or comments? Okay, so I'm still a little curious and with some trepidation, I continue to ask this question. It's been alleged that there was some kind of impropriety between the firm or principals in the firm if I'm understanding this correctly and people at the redistricting commission Is that in any way true?
Not to my knowledge at all. This is a case where we made a recommendation to the board, I will be making a different recommendation of the board but I'm not aware of any untoward contact between members of the redistricting commission and any particular firm.
I don't have any information to that effect.
Okay so what you're representing to me is that people, principals in the company had contributed to supervisory campaigns and that was as close as it got to the redistricting commission.
Chair and Supervisors, I did not do an exhaustive search of the Form 760s as to each Independent Redistricting Commission member. But looking at this- Not a principal of the firm but I believe one of the attorneys of the firm who was within the scope of work for this and that's my reason for withdrawing.
Okay. I thought that I just heard Supervisor Williams say that, so I was just trying to get a confirmation.
You have a question
Mr. Chair?
Mr. Gazzone is correct it was one of the members of the firm and she signed a check to two supervisorial campaigns, two large contributions.
And Chair and Supervisors, again on working with this I discussed with the firm. And they decided that rather than walling off or removing or reshaping the work based on my counsel to them, they withdrew from consideration for this matter so they are not a candidate for this contract.
Appreciate the abundance of caution and we'll be back at a future date with a different firm. We're just withdrawing this item, there's no vote needed. And then I don't- Mr. Chair,
I have a
question. Supervisor Lavenino?
Thank you. So is it in the, how are we in the middle of, I mean, I'd like to extricate ourselves as much as possible from the Citizens Redistricting Commission. How are we in the middle of appointing their council? Is that written in the scope of our work or Shouldn't they be meeting and choosing council? How is this all decided? Mr. Gazzani.
Chair and supervisors, in order for them to hit the ground running we wanted to have council available to them. Our plan all along was to say if they don't like the council that we selected we would work with them to pick a different council. The realities are there are probably 10 or 12 firms in California that do this specialized work so it's a fairly limited playing field.
As I mentioned earlier in my remarks We'll be present at their Wednesday meeting, saying several times that we are not their attorney. We're not forming an attorney-client relationship with them but we will give them the standard public briefing on Brown Act 1090 and Political Reform Act so they don't inadvertently run afoul of any of those things on their way to their first substantive meeting.
But the board has the contracting authority to provide support services for this entity. So that is how we end up Proffering this to you withdrawing it and we'll be back with another one That this entity does not have independent contracting authority All
right, so everybody clear mr. Chair supervisor Adam
I Just appreciate the transparency
Thank You appreciate that too I don't believe actually anyone requested the day 18 be taken off the administrative agenda. Is that correct?
I flirted with the idea, but
so I'll give one sentence if you want. But we need to read it into the record if you do. So go ahead Madam Clerk would
0:18 – 0:2417 turns
you read A18 into
Chair Hart, members of the board. Administrative item number 18 is from public health. It is to consider recommendations regarding the conversion of purchase contract BL 05011 to a board contract with community health centers of the Central Coast for targeted outreach to slow the spread of COVID-19.
Supervisor Williams? I think this is just another example of the county's COVID strategy particularly towards populations where there's been a higher level of spread Specifically the recruitment of promotoras which are sort of lay people, health educators and in other healthcare fields. The use of promotoras has been very effective and we hope it will help on our strategy.
Thank you for highlighting the work of the Public Health Department. That concludes the administrative agenda all we need is a motion to approve it including Withdrawing item 810 could I get a motion?
so moved
Motion has been made Second and seconded multiple times. Thank you both Any discussion madam clerk, could you please call the roll
mr.. Adam
Hi,
mr. Lavagnino All
right,
mr.. Williams
I
miss Hartman chair motion passes unanimously.
Now's the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the board's agenda today. I'm clear. Are there any requests to speak on items that are not on today's agenda?
Chair her and members of the board, we have two requests to speak on general public comment today and we're going to begin with Judy Paulson to be followed by Rene O'Neill.
Thank you very much.
Good morning. I'm bringing you an update on our situation here in Santa Maria. I've said from the beginning that hemp and cannabis are the same problem, and this is becoming a reality for us. Here's some background. 16 lots in our community are incorrectly zoned as Ag 240, and this has been confirmed by European D staff. They call them legal non-conforming lots.
Most are under 20 acres all have designating building envelopes assigned by the county The EIR for these lots discusses them as a development with a water system, roads etc. We purchased our lot with this understanding. When we built we had to comply with this EIR and the designated home building envelope. The fire department required compliance with housing development standards.
I've got letters from the fire department calling this a development. Because the county designated this as a development we were required to bring in utilities for all 16 lots with this housing development idea. But now because these lots are incorrectly zoned as Ag 240, we are vulnerable to cannabis. And what has happened is the lot directly in front of our property previously growing hemp incorrectly zoned as Ag 240 has been sold to an individual from Los Angeles who was planning on planting cannabis. He apparently also had to grow in Lompoc. We got wind of this contacted him and surprised he is quite confident and arrogant that he will be successful in getting approval of this new growth. He's not from Santa Barbara County. He's coming here buying vulnerable land because he believes our county is cannabis friendly.
So once again, you know what? What's going on folks? We're hoping that once all the facts are known about this law in this community that this application for cannabis will be denied but how did we get here? You know I'd like to close with talking about my experience with hemp and cannabis nightmare that began five months ago And the first five days of my experience, which was about five months ago. I went on a search for answers with the county folks. I was dismissed and told some outrageous things so I began my own research and what I discovered was that I was being intentionally misled and outright lied to. So armed with facts, I again began making phone calls and the more I pushed back, the more intimidation tactics I received. I've been yelled at personally attacked And give an unsolicited advice to stop asking questions.
I've endured a disgusting blame game that continues to this day and asked to pay $8,000 to correct zoning mistakes made by the county that have made us vulnerable to cannabis. We've had sheriff incidents shots theft criminals on our property traffic noise safety issues overwhelming odor and now cannabis is coming. And by the way the hemp issue is far from being resolved So we are at our wits end, people. I am so completely disgusted with what the county has done and with what they have not done. At this point, we're in the fight for our lives. This permanent cannabis grow from an outsider from Santa Barbara County will have permanent consequences. So stand by. Thank you.
0:24 – 0:2912 turns
We will now go to Renee O'Neill, who is our final speaker.
Good morning Supervisors. Renee O'Neill speaking. I want to ditto everything Judy Paulson just spoke And I really hope that there's a news agency that's listening to this public comment because maybe people like John Palminteri, investigative reporter needs to put this out there to the public because the general public is completely unaware of what is going on behind closed doors with him.
Everyone who's listening Hemp is not regulated in this county. There are no regulations that the board has brought before the public, there are no buffer zones so you could have an empty field next to you or a school or any other sensitive receptor and have someone decide to grow a hemp farm right up to your boundary line. Hemp is very much like cannabis it has the same Issues many growers use it to camouflage growing cannabis in the middle of it because the plants are so similar.
I'm surprised I'm not even hearing things from the cannabis growers who that legitimately want to have a valuable crop that is not cross pollinated by hemp. I am surprised we're not hearing from them. So I really concerned what's going on here If I was a hemp, if I was a cannabis grower, I'd be very concerned about the fact that the county does not have any intention of regulating hemp. Which by the way folks and John Palmentieri or whoever news people are listening this is going to become a federally legal it is a federally legal crop but there there are no laws, no restrictions, no regulations in where it can be grown How close it can be grown to a school or another cannabis farm or a vineyard.
I'm very disappointed. I've been asking this board to please answer my question when are you going to put hemp on the agenda October 30th 31st is the deadline. I've been asking this for months and like Peter Adams said earlier I'm going to continue asking these questions. Are there any questions or comments or anything that the board can say why they have not answered my question as to why hemp is not being put on the agenda?
Thank you,
Ms.
O'Neill. I'd like an
answer
today
right now
please. Thank you Ms.O'Neill appreciate your comments.
Well, Mr. Chair, I want to just help remind Renee that public comment is not meant to be the provision of public comment for items not to be on the agenda is not supposed to be a dialogue. That's that's the point it's supposed to be you giving us some information, not us responding You know, I will repeat that. I have concerns about him. I think the majority of the board shares different levels of concerns and I do not think that the situation will last that it is unregulated.
It is while it is correct that it has unregulated. It is also correct to say it is not permitted by the county and so there is a sort of gray area that we have attempted to assert Our rights already on in terms of not having hemp in an unpermitted state.
Thank you, Supervisor Williams that concludes our public comment and
the next item is departmental item number one would you please read that item into the record?
0:29 – 0:545 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number one is from community services. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Central Coast Community Energy 3CE member agency annual update.
Welcome Ms Watkins.
Good morning Chair Hart, members of the Board. As you're aware last year we joined Monterey Bay Community Energy, a community choice energy provider. They have since changed their name to reflect their expanded territory and are now known as Central Coast Community Energy. Today, J.R. Killigrew, Director of Communications and Outreach for Central Coast Community Energy or 3CE is here to provide a member update and he'll give us a little bit more information on 3CE's energy procurement, an update on energy programs, and provide a bit more detail on the coming enrollment of customers in Santa Barbara County.
J.R.?
Thank you, Mr. Killegrew and welcome digitally and virtually.
Yes it's thank you Chair Hart and honorable supervisors and Miss Watkins. Thank you again for the opportunity to port in virtually to engage with you all I'm up here in Monterey and I'm sorry can't make the trip down south just yet but we do appreciate all the effort both regionally and statewide just help flatten the curve related to COVID-19 So yes, today is going to be about how we can remind you about the great journey that the County of Santa Barbara took to join at the time Monterey Bay Community Power but now Central Coast Community Energy. But also most importantly about this upcoming enrollment that's gonna start in January 2021. What we like to do set the stage and just reminding the audience and the Board of Supervisors about how does CCA or community choice aggregation work?
It was put into place by Assembly Bill 117 back in 2002, that allowed cities and counties to either create their own agency individually or create a consortium of cities and counties that would ultimately go out to the wholesale market and procure energy on behalf of the needs of their residents and businesses and agricultural customers. So that's where the big kind of shift in the energy market had taken place. We'll fast forward to 2020 there were actually 21 agencies like us serving the Central Coast. Sorry, if you could go back to the first slide please.
There we go, perfect. Serving over 10 million customers statewide and actually it's forecasted by 2025 that 85% of the electrical load will be served by this great network of CCAs but the great thing about this model is you're still able to leverage the infrastructure from the investor-owned utility, the billing service And ultimately, we like to just think about it. You get the same great service but only at more competitive and more valuable prices.
Next slide. So as Miss Watkins alluded to I think the County of Santa Barbara and all the effort that happened last year really kind of laid the foundation for us to go ahead and change our name. We are now Central Coast Community Energy as of September 4th this isn't a doing business as we actually went filed with Secretary of State We amended our joint powers authority agreement, so we are now our formally Central Coast Community Energy to really represent the fact that we serve communities across the entire central coast. And while we did start with Humble Roots up in the Monterey Bay region, now serving 33 communities across five counties, the Central Coast really is that synonymous name that everyone is familiar with. So especially with such a significant enrollment, we wanted to kind of set the tone right away and make sure that customers can connect with us on a better way with this name.
So we have our new website is 3cenergy.org and our tagline is clean energy, local control. Next slide. So who we are as you learned late last year when we were engaging with you folks, as well as the stakeholders across the Santa Barbara County region, we started with the six sorry, the 16 cities within the Monterey region, as well as the three counties back in 2018 But if you recall, the cities of Morro Bay and San Luis Obispo did request membership back in late 2018. That's actually what jumpstarted our efforts to start engaging with the other communities in San Luis Obispo County as well as the county of Santa Barbara and the communities there within the county.
Fast forward to now we have 33 member agencies spanning those five counties. And I'd just like to acknowledge that the city of Builton is the most recent inductee into our joint powers authority agency. So it's great to see that all the communities in Santa Barbara County are now involved on our agency outside of the city of Santa Barbara, which has started its own program and then the city of Lompoc is a municipal utility. So we've really done a phenomenal job in partnership with stakeholders and business leaders in Santa Barbara County to provide this option to customers across the county.
Next slide. What separates us apart from the vertically integrated investor-owned utility model is the access to the public and our governance structure. So what, the way we are governed is by our boards or policy boards as of elected officials. And we're greatly appreciated to have Supervisor Daswillian serving as the seat for County of Santa Barbara. I did also want to mention that Mayor Alice Patino from Santa Maria sits on the policy board for the City of Santa Maria And then Mayor Julian from Guadalupe actually represents the city of Guadalupe, Solvang and Buelton. So it's really great to see the representation from Santa Barbara already on our boards actively participating in decision-making and really getting a good sense of how this agency works well before the enrollment in January 2021.
On our operations board, it's wonderful to have the Chief Executive Officer Ona Miyasato as our representative there City Manager Jason Stilwell sits on the seat for Santa Maria, as well as city manager Todd Bodum sits on the seat representing Guadalupe, Solvang and Gilton. And actually I did want to mention that our Community Advisory Council is another great opportunity for us to engage in the community. We actually have brought on four new Community Advisory Council members and three of the four represent Santa Barbara County. So John Hughes from Santa Maria, Katie Davis from Goleta And Heather Allen from Carpinteria are our new community advisory council members. So, you know, from the point when County of Santa Barbara was bought on board last December to now we've really seen a lot of great representation from Santa Barbara at all levels of our governance structure.
Next slide. In terms of the accomplishments, we like to categorize these about providing folks with choice where they didn't have choice before the economic vitality of reinvesting through cost savings through programs as well as additional opportunities, the local support of the economy in terms of having a going at least trying to have a local vendor first approach to make sure that any contracts are available. And then also clean energy that's really our moniker how are we going to develop and deploy and aggressively pursue reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the energy supply?
But I did want to highlight that it's brand new news but it's probably some of the most exciting news that I've heard today 3CE actually just received the first A rating from S&P from any CCA in the state of California. We actually got that rating later on last week and I did want to share with you folks today that it really is a testament to our financial stability, our operational sustainability and just the whole direction of where this agency is moving forward to get the first A rating of any CCA in the state of California so it's really big news We just appreciate everyone who's been a part of that to make that happen.
Next slide. COVID is on everyone's mind, we know there's a tremendous amount of work that's being done across all community groups across all regions not only in California but nationwide. But we did want to just highlight to the Board of Supervisors what 3CE did a couple months ago in response to COVID-19 We actually cut all of our electric generation rates by 50% for all customers for two months. That actually equated to about $24 million of financial relief, and this really was an impactful unanimous decision that all board members were supportive of in terms of what can we do to be an active participant in addressing the pandemic a few months ago that continues to move on? So this is just another innovative and creative solution that a public agency can bring forth like 3CE.
Next slide. And moving on to procurement, we are aggressively pursuing some incredible opportunities for us to help reshape the grid in California and deploy clean electrons onto it. Right now today, we've contracted for I believe it's eight contracts and that's a mixture of geothermal which is a baseline resource so that runs 24-7 As well as solar plus storage, but also did want to mention that we did sign a contract for a utility scale battery storage project. That's in South Monterey County that's actually being attached to it a pretty significant solar array. So that is going to be our first local project that we're really excited about that should be coming online sometime mid next year.
It's a great opportunity for us to be able to pair existing solar with a utility scale battery project. These projects actually account for 35% of our current energy demand. But as you know, we're expanding down into Santa Barbara County as well as San Luis Obispo and that's really what gave us an opportunity to reevaluate the next stage in this agency in terms of our energy procurement. So next slide please.
And that leads us to this. This is probably one of the most exciting efforts that this agency has laid out with support from our board So actually, we have set a new pathway or strategy to be 60% renewable from renewable bucket one RPS eligible resources by 2025. And 100% of our energy supply will be sourced from renewable energy by 2030 and that will be based on a monthly basis. We are moving away from annual accounting where you basically can just produce a whole lot of stuff in one month and then say it kind of aggregates across the year But no, we want to make sure we balance how much our consumers consume on a monthly basis with the amount of renewable energy we're putting on the grid. So this is actually 15 years ahead of the state's goals and we actually can do it more affordably than if we continued with our kind of carbon free slash renewable energy, uh, renewable portfolio standard model, which was leveraging large hydro attributes from the Pacific Northwest and renewable energy credits from California in the surrounding areas.
The fact that we're breaking free of that and moving forward with this innovative and affordable policy and strategy, it's really exciting that I know a lot of advocates and business leaders are getting behind moving forward. Next slide. Now, moving towards programs. So there are two ways that we like to affect change in the Central Coast and in the greater California area. One is about really accelerating clean and renewable resources on the grid Then how do we address the local greenhouse gas emissions and the local energy challenges that the Central Coast has? Well, we do that through our energy program. So we set aside 3% of our gross revenue. That's usually somewhere around about $12 to $15 million a year where we work with the community kind of develop priorities design criteria program concepts and then lead with a collective suite of programs that we present to our policy board each year at our annual meetings So here are some of the highlights that you can see here, but I did want to mention two programs that we are really excited about.
One is a electrification grant program for new residential housing. So whether it's single family homes or multifamily homes, if it's affordable housing or market rate housing, we're providing incentives so you don't have to build any gas lines and we actually help drive down the cost of that so it could be even more affordable. We actually had About $1.2 million worth of grants available to housing developers last year, and I'm not kidding when I say this, all of that money was gobbled up in four hours.
So the idea that there's an opportunity for us to electrify new housing stock, we know there's a huge market, but we're excited to be a part of this process moving forward to now expand this opportunity down into Santa Barbara as well. Alternatively, we actually have been working with our local air district to provide no cost school buses that are electric to six school districts in the Monterey Bay region. We're actually going to expand that down to San Luis Obispo communities, as well as Santa Barbara County community. So if there are school busses at a school districts that are looking to electrify their fleet, we'd love to hear about it. We'd love to support that next slide.
I did want to mention the last program is technically a fund but Our board did set up about $25 million that was set aside to provide resiliency. So this is very quickly a backup supply program that allows for the public sector, whether it's member agencies like the County of Santa Barbara, the City of Santa Maria, the City of Guadalupe, the City of Solvang, to get access to low-cost financing to build a backup power supply for their critical loads, whether if you think about it's your jail, your police station, your fire station, your libraries or even school districts or public hospitals. So this is just another innovative way we're trying to provide solutions, low cost solutions to ensure that folks can have the energy that they need in case of public facing power shutoffs or as you know some of the rolling power outages that we had a few months ago.
Next slide. So now we get to pivot into the really, the meat of this discussion which is about the statistics within the County of Santa Barbara. What's really dynamic about your county is you actually are served by two investor-owned utilities. You know I think it's kind of Vanderburg Air Force Base as the dividing line so south of that we have Southern California, Edison has your investor-owned utility and then north of that you have PG&E. So you have about 52,500 total accounts that are eligible to enroll across the two areas. The majority are residential, about 45,000 customers in residential and then between commercial and agricultural you got a little over 8,000 but yes you have a lot of residential customers but I believe about 70% of the load so the incoming demand that we have to go and procure for comes from those 8200 commercial and agricultural customers.
So it's really important for us to keep an eye on the prize in terms of engaging with important and significant agricultural customers as well as commercial customers. And just to give you a snapshot in terms of how much consumption or energy that the County of Santa Barbara consumes each year, it's about 1.1 billion kilowatt hours per year and that is actually a little over 20% of our total load that we're going to serve moving forward. So Santa Barbara County is definitely a pretty significant player in terms of our overall power mix and what we have to do to serve our customers there. Next slide.
In terms of community outreach, we have developed a very comprehensive community enrollment plan. We've shared that with County of Santa Barbara staff and be certainly happy to share that with the Board of Supervisors so you can see all of the different strategies and tactics that we're going to deploy to make sure that this enrollment is successful but we did want to highlight some of the top bullet points just so that you are aware So we are doing direct outreach with the top customers by load individually, one-on-one reaching out to them to help them understand what their consumption is going to look like, what their bill is going to look like and how this enrollment's gonna benefit them. We have staff working tirelessly to connect with community based organizations.
I know our group has already had a couple of good conversations with the Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau to name the least We also have a pretty robust advertising effort that's going to go underway in terms of digital radio, as well as doing some digital videos that are going to help share the story about us. And then of course the required mailers we have to send out and then additionally our call center here in Monterey is equipped with highly professional educated staff members to handle any other kind of NEM or residential questions And then we have set aside three distinct months to enroll the net energy metering customers that mostly aligns with their true ups. We're really excited to collaborate with our city and county staff to distribute information about the enrollment through newsletters, social media platforms.
We've set up a SharePoint folder or a shared file folder for our city and county staff to give them all the tools and resources for them to be empowered to get the information out to your constituents. Next slide. Very quickly, the service offerings. All customers will be enrolled in 3C Choice. That's our primary service offering at competitive rates. So that rate will come at a 2% discount after we add in all the fees that PG&E puts in. The customer is going to be saving some money. We also do offer 100% renewable energy offering 3C Prime should folks want to enroll in that voluntary service offering. Next slide.
In terms of the enrollment, I did want to, this slide's a little busy but I did want to acknowledge that within Santa Barbara County there will be two enrollments. The first enrollment will be for customers that are within the PG&E service territory so the first notice will go out in November. We'd be more than happy to share that notice with the Board of Supervisors as well as staff so they're aware in case folks ask like, I didn't get my mailer what does it look like? And then we have another mailer that goes out in December And then the virtual transition happens in January of 2021. So I think there are about 20 to 22 different meter read dates for every customer, um, across the service area. So everybody's going to be basically enrolled at on their meter read date and then they will get their bill about a 20 to 30 days after that meter redate, which we'll have the central coast community energy electric generation charges.
But by law, we still have to send another bit another notice in February of 2021 and then March of 2021. And the same model will follow when we enroll the southern Santa Barbara customers, so Goleta Carpentaria and the remaining unincorporated Santa Barbara County. So the first notice will go out August of 2021, second September of 2021, virtual transition happens in October, and then the last two mailers going out in November and December. But again rest assured customers can opt out at any time during the enrollment period.
We like to think that Having 150 days to make a decision from the point where you get your first mailer to the last one should be enough significant amount of time. But if not, and just miss everything and you want to opt out at another time, just realize that there is a small administrative fee for each account so $5 for residential 25 for commercial customers. Next slide.
And again I did want to highlight because there are I think about 7000 net energy metering customers that we're going to be enrolling So we've actually looked at the data and a lot of the true ups actually seem to align over the span of three months. So we're looking at April of 2021, July of 2021 and October of 2021. So basically for folks who have certain true ups, we're going to be sliding them into those three months but that will actually help minimize the true up impacts that happen because as a customer when you become a CCA customer PG&E or SCE has to do an automatic true up So if you owe a balance, you actually have to pay PG&E that. But if you have credits those credits end up getting wiped away so we're really trying to make this an easy seamless transition for net energy metering customers but we still will follow the same enrollment schedule of sending the notices but we'll also send some custom emails and custom letters to them set up some custom webinars to make sure that folks really get a sense of what's going on in terms of being a NEM customer with us But you still will get all the billing from PG&E.
I think the most important takeaway from today is that you'll still get the bill from PG& E, you'll still get the bill from SCE. We become a line item on the first page of the bill and then on page three or sorry, page four, you will see the detailed charges of Central Coast Community Energy Charges so that you know you're not being double charged for anything.
Next slide? And here is just a snapshot of the kind of timeline for the enrollment. So, a lot of the preparatory actions are taking place in September and October, but we really are doing a great job reaching out to community-based organizations and key leaders. You know, we joined the Santa Maria Valley Chamber. We're looking at joining other types of business groups to get ahead of them and really connect and get to know those business leaders and community leaders And really kind of look at leveraging established trusted partners to help validate the enrollment. But then November and December are much about the enrollment notifications, we do have two virtual public forums on December 8th that's in English and December 10th that's actually going to be in Spanish.
We're grateful to have Supervisor Das Williams provide some opening comments on December 8th but if any other supervisors would like to join we certainly can extend the invitation if you'd like to speak. You know we really just want to have this collective approach to outreach to make sure that customers and your constituents are aware of what's going on. January, we love to have a ceremonial flip the switch event it most likely will be virtual so we'll be working on kind of fleshing out the details for that but that's just sort of an opportunity to commemorate the launch of service in a fun and exciting way and then we wrap up in February and March with final enrollment notifications and outreach and advertising but then from there as you become our customers we really kind Take a big step in terms of engaging with the County of Santa Barbara, in terms of all the great efforts that we're going to be deploying across the Central Coast.
Next slide. And now to wrap things up I hopefully have been succinct and efficient with all your time but I did want to mention we have opened up a satellite office in San Luis Obispo. I know there's still some discussions about the potential opening up an office in Santa Barbara County too so rest assured we're still evaluating that option but Big key takeaways, this pathway to 100% clean and renewable energy by 2030 is a great effort that we are undertaking that's actually going to help triple our deployment of clean and renewable resources on the grid. It really kind of set us apart from other CCAs in the state in terms of developing new resources to really help clean up the electric grid in California.
We're working with our community advisory counselors on greater outreach and engagement to learn from the community, bring that feedback to our boards and really kind of look at a more kind of collaborative environment in terms of the efforts that are taking forth. But also we set up a non-voting seat participation for the operations and policy boards for those communities who don't have an elected official or city or county executive on our board Those you can designate a staff member or sorry, elected official to join and actually participate in the discussions that are operations and policy board. So that's a big win in terms of making sure we get comprehensive feedback from all 33 of our member agencies. And then last but not least I'll just mention that over the course of 2021 and even with the enrollment of built-in and early 2022 it will be about 140,000 new customers enrolling across 12 communities such that we should have close to 440,000 customers and about 5.4 billion kilowatt hours of annual consumption all kind of accelerating towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions providing competitive rates and giving those customers local control in the choice of where and how their energy is being sourced so at that moment I will pause I know the next slide just has our contact information but I greatly appreciate the time and I greatly appreciate the leadership of the county, Santa Barbara and all the communities there within to be a part of this agency and help shaping it to become Central Coast Community Energy.
So thank you very much for your time Board of Supervisors.
0:54 – 0:596 turns
Thank you very much Commissioner Killebrew for your incredibly good presentation. It covered a lot of territory and many important innovative new things to announce so I appreciate hearing all that. We'll start, I think Supervisor Williams has some questions?
Not questions, just want to add to the report as your representative on the policy board. And I've also been honored to be asked to serve on the executive board. So there's a policy board has 20 something folks, the executive board has seven and so that's been a chance to dig in and do a little bit more work. I want to first report that my experience with the staff is that they are extremely competent. They know the issues, they are especially competent from a technical standpoint which I think in something of this nature is incredibly important.
This organization is undergoing what I would characterize as a practical and moral revolution. CCEs have been criticized both by labor unions and by some conservatives for, you know, greenwashing. And that practice has been in the past been both through the purchase of what's called unbundled RECs, Renewable Energy Credits and the issue of how you procure your carbon-free attributes And I have joined that critique feeling that that is a way to not deliver on really the promise of cleaner energy.
Give people the feeling, a good feeling. Right? And that you pay a lot of money for that good feeling and I in my view we should be using that money to actually procure renewable energy credits or renewable energy contracts or procure our own facilities and built our own facilities And the organization, through a convoluted story that I won't waste your time with has really been galvanized to take that action. And that action isn't easy. It means that for a certain amount of time your power content labels don't look as good. The power content labels have a lot of flaws in them. I'll give you an example That staff used, if you look at one IOU's power content label it looks like they hardly have any natural gas. And that's of course a fantasy right?
And so this transition I think is much more substantive. It's much more about procuring real renewable energy And it's also for the folks worried about bottom line. Also not spending money on credits that really are are the principal purpose is just sort of to adhere to The numbers that are set and are not, in my view, real renewable energy. And so it's been a pleasure serving the public and this board on the CCE.
In trying to provide an example for the rest of the state of a community choice aggregator that is prizing substance and real renewable energy over feel-good labels.
Thank you, Supervisor Williams. And thank you for investing so much your time and leadership on the CCE board. Supervisor Hartman?
I didn't actually have my light on, but I just want to say I'm so impressed. This was the dream and now it's about to launch and we joined the right CCE and I think the credit rating shows that. I think the focus on local production of renewable energy, the ambitious goals. So I'm just really excited and I'm so proud that all of our communities in the county have joined up
Thank you very much Supervisor Hartman. Are there any other questions for Mr. Killegrew? Do we have some public comment?
Chair Hart and members of the board, we do have one request to speak on this item and that is Andy Caldwell.
1:00 – 1:097 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board. Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. I actually debated Mr. Killegrew in several different city council meetings throughout the Central Coast so I actually know a fairly good amount about this program and first off as I mentioned to you and others you're literally stepping over a billion dollars of greenhouse gas free electricity to pick up A few million here and there in a form of a slush fund. And what am I talking about? Diablo nuclear power plant, community choice energy hurt Diablo's future because it nuclear energy wasn't considered renewable. So therefore when they had to pursue 100% renewable portfolio, they were left with the white elephant which actually provides 10% of California's Base load.
And so sure enough, what do we have? I think it's on slide 11. They weren't numbered. You're going to take use this as a slush fund for government projects or local projects of $20 million while being willing to loan the private sector, loan the private sector 5 million. But all the while because we've already gone so far into the renewable portfolio in California Our electricity prices are 50% higher than the rest of the country. You never want to talk about that, you're saying look at how much we're saving but you're not saving 50% of what of the over cost that we're charging people right now.
Finally there was absolutely no mention whatsoever in any of the debates or hearings that they would charge people to drop out after a quote unquote free period City Council members throughout the Central Coast asked them, will there be any penalty to drop out? And the answer every single time was no. So this charge to drop off is a surprise and you know the bottom line here is that I just did a show about a guy from Boston Review, a professor from Rutgers wrote this piece Saying we better start getting used to being left without power. And he used Zimbabwe and Puerto Rico, and this guy is pro. He is pro-renewable but he's done the math. He's an honest academic saying we'd better get used to living without power on a regular basis because we do not have the capacity to produce or store the electricity for the evening and nighttime.
So I wish you guys to be more honest that you're actually into a plan that costs the poor more money for electricity than they could afford to pay. In places like England it's called heat or eat, heat or eat. They had to choose between their food bill and their electricity bill. And again, I wish you would address this issue that there was no advance warning they would charge people to drop out. Thank you.
Thank you Mr. Caldwell, Supervisor Williams.
I think it's inaccurate to in any way whether you view it as a positive or negative to blame 3CE for the demise of Diablo Canyon that is a serious change to the energy grid, it is 9% of the total power output for the whole state. So obviously that is a big change but that was arrived at with a negotiated settlement between litigants and PG&E long before we joined 3CE and arguably when Monterey Bay Community Power, Former name was in its infancy.
I just think that it's That many of the issues that Mr. Caldwell has brought up, I think is incredibly addressed, forcefully addressed, ethically addressed, pragmatically addressed by shifting away from the purchase of carbon free attributes and towards the purchase of actual renewable energy to meet the goals of the organization and statutory goals that the state of California mandates.
Um, so you know whatever heart break or heartache that some had, I just think there's much less reason for this to be a partisan wise or politically divisive. We really attempted to make this about substance and I think consumers can have a lot of confidence That by sticking with 3CE, they are gonna not only be part of a cleaner energy future but also part of a future where we are not using illusions and accounting tricks to pretend that we're greener than we are. But are doing this honestly and thoughtfully.
I've also think it's noteworthy that if the projects that are proposed for The localized projects, or actually the projects all over the portfolio. 84% of them include storage as an element and that's another 200 megawatts of battery storage so I think directly to Mr. Caldwell's point that somehow this is going to jeopardize our energy supply. This is actually building resiliency and building a 24-hour resiliency in direct contrast to his comments.
Are there other comments or questions for Mr. Killegrew? Well thank you again for joining us virtually, Mr. Killegrew. It's really a pleasure to be part of Central Coast Community Energy. San Barbara County has wanted for a long time to be moving forward in this space and we're really pleased to have Supervisor Williams and Ms. Miyasato and Supervisor Hartman all very actively involved. I also know Councilmember Richards in the City of Coleta is really engaged as well.
Through leadership on the board and we just appreciate your taking the time to come here. Any will give you the final words if you'd like to add anything?
Yes, thank you chair hard if I may. Yeah so one thing that yeah we do pride ourselves on the transparency. You know the opt out fee has always been there. We've never hide it hid from that all the presentations that we had. It was all about like hey outside of the enrollment period. I think the Diablo is a can of worms Everyone has their on different sides of the aisle about it again. It was built incorrectly first, it was horribly expensive and actually all rate payers have been subsidizing that horribly expensive project from day one. It's now been baked into the PCIA and the PCIA is that exit fee that when a CCA customer or DA customer leaves they basically pay the above market Delta between what I'm going to talk a little bit about the price of energy costs now versus what that contract cost now is, or that original contract price.
So everyone's paying for Diablo whether you're a bundled PG&E customer or your unbundled CCA customer. So again when that thing goes off in 2025 there's a comprehensive effort to be able to replace that. Yes it's baseload resource we understand that but there was a myriad of reasons why that thing was being shut down mostly because it And the fact that energy efficiency and a suite of other resources that are coming online, and the need for renewable energy. That was the kind of straw that broke that camel's back effectively.
I think at the end of the day our ability to provide folks with access to local programs that can help electrify and fuel switch is another great opportunity. And as Supervisor Williams mentioned, the fact that we're breaking away from the optics and the symbolism into reality such that it looks like we're going to be building another 1,200 megawatts of renewable energy and another probably 500 megawatts of battery storage.
That is significant, and we're going to be doing that in the next eight to 10 years. And I would like to say on the last thing that really separates the CCAs from the IOUs is we got together another group of seven CCAs to actually issue the first long-duration storage RFO And so that's looking at storage of eight hours or more. So when folks are saying about reliability and issues about the grid, we're hoping to get 500 megawatts of long duration storage of eight hours or more onto the grid before 2026.
So these are the type of solutions that we're really trying to accelerate on behalf of our customers to make sure that we have a clean affordable and resilient
grid.
So again I thank everybody for the opportunity. We look forward to a long, long range of success and opportunities for your constituents. Thank you very much for the time this morning.
1:10 – 1:1316 turns
On the opt-out fee, so there is a grace period and from what I was reading people will be notified a couple of months in a row of how to opt out. Is that correct?
That's correct.
Do you
want to give that out? Yes. So you can call, you can opt out at 3cenergy.org and then forward slash opt dash out or you can call our call center. Um, and I can give you the call center number right now. It's 888-909-6277. You also can email it to infoat3ce.org. You'll just need your PG&E account number and your address. And then we do have a virtual form online where you can input your PG&E account number and your address, and you can opt out there. And again just for full transparency sometimes it takes one or two billing cycles to get us off your bill so based on when you initiate the opt-out if it's at the beginning of your bill cycle you most likely will not see our charges on the next bill but if it's probably five to ten days into your new billing cycle It's just a matter of time.
Chair Hart, if I could. I just wanted to mention that we're also going to be doing outreach in support of 3CE and we're developing a web page where they can or people can you know who visit our One Climate page will be able to access information about 3CE and all the information about their options to opt out so that will also be available and we'll be doing some outreach to help support to let people know about their options
Thank you for that additional comment. And I assume the notification, the outreach and the opt-out information is phased both times? There's the effort for the PG&E area and then there will be an effort later on in 21 when we're talking about Edison Territory.
Yes, that's correct and we've also started meeting with the City of Santa Barbara along with 3CE to just talk about how we could mitigate any confusion on behalf of the public since there'll be two community choice energy programs rolling out at the same time. So we're looking at some potential options to help make that a little bit more clear to the public.
Thank you Ms. Watkins, thank you for that additional comment. Is there a motion to receive and file the report? Motion has been made, is there a second? Second. Any discussion? Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?
Mr. Adam?
Aye.
Mr. Lavinino?
Aye.
Mr. Williams? Aye Ms. Hartman? Aye Chair Hartz?
Aye
Motion passes unanimously
Let's take a 10 minute break and we'll come back for item D2
1:17 – 1:191 turns
Yeah. Thank you. Yeah.
1:25 – 1:273 turns
you Thank you.
We'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting and
the next item is department item number 2. Madam Clerk, would you please read that item into the record?
1:27 – 1:3912 turns
Chair Hart and members of the board, Departmental Item Number Two is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update. Dr.
DeRionne Ramoso welcome.
Thank you good morning. Briefing topics for this morning. I'll quickly go over the data for our county with regards to COVID-19 and also give you a preview of our tier assignment from the blueprint for a safer economy. We have currently 9,641 cumulative cases in our county This is a 3.5 slight increase from earlier period, we have 121 active cases and we have 12 currently hospitalized cases. Our cumulative deaths stand at 119.
Our numbers for the seven day rolling sum of new cases by area is relatively stable. With the largest decrease in numbers in Lompoc, a decrease of 36%, and in Santa Maria at a decrease of 37%. This graph describes our hospitalization. We are seeing decreasing hospitalization and as I mentioned earlier, currently with 12.
Mr Chair,
Supervisor Adam.
I just want to dwell on this for a moment basking the glory of taking a look at that graph and We're actually at a lower level than we were April 1, right? Is that what I see there, Doctor? Yes.
That is correct.
Okay. Good deal. Thank you.
Thank you, Supervisor Adam. Dr. Derbanosa, please continue.
This graph describes our incidence of deaths by the week of occurrence and as mentioned earlier, we cumulatively have 119 deaths I want to point out that community members as well as your board can access daily statistics and on our website at publichealthsbc.org, we post our surveillance metrics as well as our daily status reports on this website. This is our new graph for the blueprint framework. It includes the health equity metrics, so for the substantial that is adjusted case rate from 4 to 7 and with a positivity rate is 5 to 8% and adding on the 5.3 to 8 percent health equity metric And to move into the orange, we would need to have our adjusted case rate from one to no more than 3.9 per 100,000 and for the positivity rate it would be from two to 4.9 and the health equity metric from 2.2 to no greater than 5.2.
So this again is anticipation of what the governor will be announcing at noon. We will have our adjusted case rate for this tier period and I want to point out too that this chart, the date on top, the title of the chart anticipated CDPH monitoring status it is the correct date is 10-20 and this is different than the copy that you currently have. So the Santa Barbara County metric, our adjusted case rate is at 4.3 and this is based on our raw case rate at 4.8 because of the number of tests. We completed an average of 296. This exceeds the state median and we were adjusted to downward to a 4.3.
Our positivity rate, we anticipate to be announced at 1.9 with our health equity metric at 3.2. So this really is good news, and it shows that our county is making positive movement towards the less restrictive tier except for the case rate. We're very close. This describes our case rate in a different format. I call this our rainbow chart, and this shows our trend for the last four weeks. We started at 4.5 on our case rate went up 5.8 went down to 4.2 and now eking up to 4 point 3 I want to make a note here that we are currently starting last Thursday experiencing several outbreaks in Isla Vista. We have three outbreaks related to houses, as well as additional cases in the community.
The outbreak cases will be reflected next week on our 1027 tier assignment. I also want to pause and share with your board that we have been in a joint response with UCSB. We are both, UCSB and Public Health will be doing community testing. We've expanded our testing in IV to include extra hours. We anticipate being able to test IV community at a rate of 150 tests per day this weekend Friday and Saturday.
In addition to testing, we are in joint partnership with UCSB on the contact tracing in order to contain the spread as well as partnering with UCSB on the support of services. We have been meeting on a daily basis with their COVID-19 response team as well as their leadership and will be issuing joint communication to the Isla Vista community anticipation tomorrow.
Our testing positivity rate. So the gold graph describes, we started capturing this information to describe the health equity metric and the black line describes the community percent testing positivity. And so starting with a black curve, we see last week it was 2.4%. And now down to 1.9 testing positivity, we started the health equity which is the gold line at 5% with this last rating period which covers October 4th through October 10th at 3.2. So the decreasing testing positivity means that although there have been more positive cases identified a much larger number of COVID PCR tests As I noted earlier in the current rating period compared to the previous one.
I wanted to also share with you this is all anticipation of how the rest of California has done. So for there are 12 counties in Tier 1, the purple, the most restrictive tier we are in the Tier 2 with 22 other counties And we really hope to move forward to join the 14 counties who are in Tier 3, the orange tier. And we have a handful of counties in Tier 4, the least restrictive tier assignment.
And that concludes my update for this week. I also wanted to share with your board that the reason why the public health department has not uploaded these two graphs is because we don't get the data until late Monday afternoon, so for example this information that I'm presenting to you is Anticipation it is not yet official and I received the confirmation for the data Around five o'clock on Monday afternoon. So what you are seeing is real-time data
Thank You dr. Doris and thank you for the report are there questions of staff Supervisor Williams
Well I just wanted to encourage you and your staff in their work. I personally believe you have been dedicated, hardworking and I would characterize you as a servant of the flame imperishable and hope that you continue this work. And of course there is urgency both in your work and in the public's cooperation with this work. Because we keep on right on the line. I mean, we just need to get down 0.4 points down there to get into the orange which I think everyone both for the sake of health and for the sake of jobs and living life hope to get you So I know everybody's trying hard, but let's just try a little bit harder because we're right there.
1:39 – 1:5121 turns
Thank you, Supervisor
Williams. Mr. Chair?
Yes, Supervisor Lavanino.
Thank you Mr. Chair, two questions one is you had mentioned the uptick in Isla Vista I'm just curious with hospitalization numbers as low as they are are we seeing any of those students exhibiting any symptoms that would need to be hospitalized or how would you characterize their illness?
The latest information I have from the team is that the symptoms are mild at best, with the most typical being loss of sense of taste and smell. And again some fatigue but that goes hand in hand with being college students as well. So we are not seeing serious symptoms. At this point.
And then one last question. Well, I'm going to
let that one
go. Never mind thank you.
I think the worrisome part of even though our positive cases are younger and are asymptomatic, they do come into contact with community members who may be vulnerable. Whose health status may not fare as well and that's always a worry that our hospitalization will increase as our cases increase.
I know you mentioned the close collaboration with UCSB, both on the testing and the contact tracing side. And so, you know, I think this is a classic situation with an outbreak where if you can test and contact trace, you can do the best job possible about limiting the spread of the virus. And I know UCSB put out a publication, I think last week talking about rapidly expanding their capacity to test in coordination with public health's Pop up testing in Isla Vista. Is there anything you want to add about that and the scale? And just to give the public reassurances that there is significant testing going on in that community.
Yes, there is significant testing. UCSB speaking on their behalf because we have been in close partnership with UCSB for the last few months in anticipation of school resuming. We've been meeting there they've stood up the COVID-19 response team. Our COVID- 19 response team have been in close collaboration. We've set up the algorithm and we've set up the infrastructure to anticipate So, when we had the notice of the first case last Thursday, we ramped up as well as UCSB's COVID-19 team ramped up.
Making all members of the Greek system were able to come in to UCSB and get tested. And there were other members who were not part of the Greek system who got tested as well. As soon as the positives were identified, our team was notified and Rolling out the blueprint, if you will. The infrastructure, the planning that we had been in discussion and jointly are mitigating the cases.
We have been supportive of UCSB's request. There, UCSB asked that public health expand our testing so originally we had intended only to test from 12-4 on Friday and Saturday. We have now expanded those hours and UCSB will also be supporting that testing effort by testing UCS students while we test all other students In the community as well as community members.
Thank you, Dr. Coronoso any other questions for staff These are the members of the public that would like to comment on this item
Chair Hart and members of the board we have one request to speak on this item And that is Andy Caldwell
Chair Hart, members of the board. Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. You know I know later on on your agenda you're talking about a potential fine ordinance but that brings up the question right now with Isla Vista being the current hotspot apparently the current hot spot for COVID there are universities in the country that are suspending students if they're caught at a party situation One of my daughters is still in college and they've told them that if they catch COVID, they will have to stay in their dorm for two weeks without leaving and or go home.
Now I know that you don't have particular authority over somebody living in Isla, the university may not have direct authority over somebody in Isla Vista but they do have relationships with the Greek system And this brings up a big, huge issue here. We believe that most of the people in Santa Maria that spread the contagion did so by high-density living situations and, of course, Isla Vista has high density living situations.
Now the governor is using that socioeconomic and racial thing against us in terms of creating a new metric My question to you is, to what degree is UCSB enforcing any penalties against its students that are caught partying on a Friday or Saturday night or any other night for that matter in Isla Vista? Because in essence what I believe going on here is UCSB has always had a soft hand approach And then they've left it to the board to do the dirty work. And because the board can't isolate Isla Vista, then you end up creating a county-wide ordinance or at least an unincorporated county-wide ordinance to capture everybody else when in reality you're fishing for UCSB students. It begs the question, when was the last time you confronted UCSB And tell them they need to bring the hammer down on their student body.
Not a hard question, they're responsible. Henry Yang I thought did the very responsible thing when he told the students to stay home. Told him to stay home for this quarter and I applauded him for that. But those that came if they're partying what's he gonna do about it? And like I said in other universities has suspended the students which sends a strong message that they're taking covid seriously.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you Mr. Caldwell matter is to the board supervisor Hartman
I would just like to clarify that the university is very much involved when law enforcement has to go to a gathering, they try to get information about who the landlord is and what school if any of the people in the house belong to. And then letters are sent Notification is sent to the universities, even universities that are not in our county but students are living here in Isla Vista as well as to the landlord. So people are working very hard to use whatever tools are available to encourage compliance in Isla Vista
Yeah, and the only other thing too I'd like to add is you know, I don't think it's appropriate to use the word hotspot in describing the outbreak that occurred in Isla Vista. We have had outbreaks throughout the county during the course of the pandemic and the Public Health Department has moved quickly and decisively and addressed those as they have in this outbreak situation.
And by doing that ideally we will avoid a hotspot and that is the purpose and intent of the close collaboration between the university and the public health department, and the increased testing and the contract tracing that is going on. And that is a strategy that's been developed over a very long period of time in anticipation of this possibility, and we're executing those plans and managing the situation well.
There is always the need for every resident of the county regardless of where they live to continue to be vigilant and diligent And take care of the things that need to be done, wearing a mask, staying physically apart. And that is no different in Isla Vista than it is in any other community in the county of Santa Barbara. It does seem likely that this outbreak is significant enough that it's gonna affect our numbers for a period of time. But if we're able to contain those and have this limit to this event, you know, we're gonna be able to get right back on track to the trend that we have which Dr. Dominguez has showed us is really good and in the right direction. And that's what we're all hoping. Supervisor Williams?
I want to speak in agreement with that, Chair Hart. I think the whole point is to avoid a hot spot and Andy you don't want to do that same hyping that you criticize the press for doing sometimes of using language to get people all excited but I mean you do bring up an important question about the campus Always needs to be heavily involved in the Isla Vista community for it to go in the right path.
I've spent a decent amount of time researching campus adjudication procedures predominantly in an effort to stem the tide of sexual assault that takes place around college campuses and they're, you know, a tool But I would say in terms of being able to control the spread of COVID, they would be a slow-moving tool compared to the things that the Public Health Department can do. Campus adjudication requires a convening of generally staff or faculty that serve as judges in a case and even in cases sexual assault. It is sometimes difficult, not as difficult in the criminal justice system, but it is difficult to achieve a quote conviction unquote simply because people tend not to want to deny people the ability to get their education. So I mean, it's an important point.
University involvement is really important, but I wouldn't, I wouldn't put all our hopes on campus adjudication procedures for being able to control the spread
If I may, yes
doctor is
so supervisor Williams for the chair. That's a great comment that you made so from our part as soon as we knew of the cases as soon as we were able to identify the exposed. We are able to issue quarantine orders and isolation orders as well as sending staff out to make sure that The students were fully aware of what those health officer orders meant. And I am happy to report that yes, the students took it seriously. We were able to move quickly and they are abiding by what we're asking them to do which is limit their movement so that we can contain the spread.
1:51 – 1:5915 turns
Any other comments from the board? If we could get a motion to receive and follow the report.
So moved
second which has been made in seconded any discussion ma'am clerk, would you please call the roll
Mr Adam?
No,
Mr Lavinino.
Hi
Mr Williams.
I
miss Hartman chair heart motion passes 4 to 1
thank you that brings us to item number 3 Madam Clerk would you please read that item into the record.
Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number three is from General Services. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a five-year capital improvement program CIP fiscal year 2020 through 2021 through fiscal year 2024 through 2025. The 2020 Americans with Disabilities Act ADA transition plan and 2020 general services parking lot pavement management program.
Thank you Ms. Pell. Mr. Zyrowski I see you here too? Good
morning Chair Hart and members of the board. Today we have a presentation of the fiscal year 2020-21 through fiscal year 2024-25 capital improvement program as you recall on June 2nd 2020 your board reviewed and accepted the capital improvement program via summary document for budgeting purposes With the understanding that we'd come back today or in the future which happens to be today with the more detailed formal program document So this is the presentation you will see today In addition, you will receive an update on the ADA transition plan and the General Services parking lot payment Pavement Management Program.
Both these projects were completed last fiscal year, so with that I would like to turn the presentation over to Patrick Zyrowski. He's Assistant Director of Capital Projects and Facility Maintenance. Thank you.
Chairman Hart, members of the board. Thank you for entertaining us this morning and allowing us to do this presentation on our fiscal year 2021 CIP. I want to acknowledge the presence this morning of Andrew Mung. Andrew is the Transportation Fiscal Agent for Department of Public Works and Jill Van Wee from Community Services District Parks. Capital Program Manager for their group as well. They were instrumental in assisting General Services in coordinating this, I'm really thrilled with the collaborative approach we were able to take this year.
The CIP is a multi-year planning tool that we utilize to identify and implement short term and long term capital needs. The county has been Utilizing this exercise for several decades, it's an effective tool that allows us to create a strategy for funding allocation for various specific projects. This year you'll notice that we've taken a really new approach to our capital planning process and what is presented in the document. In previous years various departments have submitted multiple projects.
A lot of that this year as well, but the reality is we want to try to focus our new approach. To indicate what what we really are going to be doing in terms of projects this fiscal year, as well as what projects are already ongoing and under construction or under design development and then projects that are in the early development. Really kind of our long term vision or long term strategy for overall capital improvements? And this is again across all three general services Department of Public Works and Parks.
Our keys this year, we used a lot of data. We're taking Renew 22, the objectives of Renew 22 very seriously. We've been collecting data utilizing that to try to formulate really good approaches on project selection. We are expanding our asset management database. I do want to acknowledge that both Parks and Public Works have been working on their databases for many years, they're a little bit ahead of us in general services but still we are continuing to collect information on a daily and weekly and monthly basis and utilizing that to help us formulate decisions. And what you'll see here is continue to create a more programmatic approach Certainly, there are individual projects that are included in our program. But trying to get funding into programs that allow us to be a little bit more nimble, allow us to be able to invest in areas that we think need to be invested and also allows us to adjust our own process to get after some projects that are of greatest need.
This year's CIP includes a total of roughly 70.5 million projects, including 6.75 million in the general services department, public works at 57.6 million and community services parks at 6.1 million. We have multiple energy reduction projects in the process right now both in development and in construction. You'll see it in the admin parking lot currently that EV charging station project is underway.
We're doing a sizable project up at Bettoravia where we've improved the lighting and will be going with some EV charging stations up in various locations in the North County as well. The continuation of multiple projects such as the probation headquarters, fire dispatch, the Bewell MHRC Fire Station 27 And then of course on the park side, the Santa Claus Lane Beach Access and Halama Beach Affordable Accommodation projects are still underway. You'll hear more on the public works side when Andrew provides his information.
We're all three departments in significant planning and design. Actually it doesn't just include the three of us here. It's in other departments as well. We're engaging with many of our departmental partners on various levels of design planning. Again, I'm really proud of this year the extensive collaboration that we've had with both DPW and CSD Parks. It's creating a more comprehensive program and I think you'll see that in both the document and our presentation today.
No good CIP program starts without taking a minute to kind of applaud our accomplishments, and they've been many across all three departments. I won't go through all of these. This is a small example of many of the projects that we're doing at the moment. I think some of the things that we want to highlight obviously is the North Branch Jail, substantially complete.
But there's a lot of little projects. We do a lot of meat and potatoes projects on the general services side for our facilities throughout the year. Just such things as refinishing the floors and replacing the windows at the Santa Barbara Veterans Hall, parking lot repairs, just doing our design-related phases for projects that we will support in the coming years.
Just a lot of projects, you know that sometimes fall through the cracks that aren't highly noticeable but stuff that we're asked to do on a regular basis. A lot of space planning and tentative improvement projects as well across the county this year.
1:59 – 2:067 turns
Good morning Supervisors I did just want to take a quick second to thank Mr. Swarovski and the General Services Capital team they've been great partners with us in developing this collaborative plan With that, Public Works did have many significant accomplishments during the last fiscal year and here are just some of the highlights. Construction of the Ashley Road Bridge that connects East Mountain Road to Sycamore Canyon Road was completed, which was originally destroyed by the 1-9 debris flow. We reconstructed the roadway embankment using recycled tires on Ortega Ridge Road for the slip repair, restoring an unsafe road and diverting over 80,000 tires from landfills.
We were able to successfully relocate on-ramp and off ramps at Clark Avenue at Highway 101 in Orcutt. Flood Control just completed their Cold Springs Debris Basin Expansion Project, which increases the ability to capture large amounts of debris. The County Surveyor is in the process of reestablishing 631 survey monuments that were destroyed during the 1-9 debris flow.
The new Tahigas Resource Center is nearing completion. Once it's up and running, it will convert commercial and residential waste into resources by recovering recyclable materials, transforming organics into landscape nutrients, and creating renewable energy in the process. With this new technology we'll divert 60% additional waste from landfills while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The Tahecus Landfill Expansion Project is also complete, which consisted of installing low permeable liner over approximately 1.5 acres of the landfill. And lastly, the Laguna County Sanitation District underwent flood protection sludge bed and sewer system improvements.
Good morning Chair Hartman and members of the board, nice to see you all. And again I want to repeat what Andrew Myung said it was a great task working with these folks on a collaborative effort for the CIP so thank you very much Patrick for doing that. Just a highlight for community services and what we were able to complete last year. We completed about three million dollars in capital improvements.
Two were at South County beaches in Summerlin and Santa Barbara Supervisor Williams.
I probably am not as abreast as the supervisors that represent these parks directly, but I'm curious now that we have some land that has been acquired from the former Bixby Ranch. What are the plans for expanding camping opportunities at Halama Beach?
Supervisor Williams through the chair. We actually received a Coastal Conservancy grant in the amount of about $100,000 it's supposed to go I believe in front of the board for acceptance in mid-November and that will do the master plan and environmental documents to see if we can what we can do to increase camping in that area as well as I'm sorry as well as beach access and trail coastal trail
and is there Also more plans for that kind of thing at Kachuma too, or is that you guys have finished your current plans?
We actually have quite a number of renovation plans there. One is the RV area and Patrick will get to that a little bit later. It's part of hopefully a COP that we'll be getting but we are going to commence the design of that area. You're also looking at some pool improvements in that area.
Great. As I mentioned earlier, we are breaking the CIP down a little bit differently this year moving forward. We really wanted to try to focus on what types of projects that we have in development and in construction and are being funded through this particular fiscal year. This category one is all of the projects, the 6.7 million on the GS side that are being Thank you.
Our typical maintenance annual program that includes a variety of programs, roof replacements, electrical system upgrades things of that nature. And then our specific projects we're doing an HR space optimization project the hearing room here the AV project is scheduled to probably happen sometime in 2021. Some fourth floor remodel improvements as well as some roof replacements and certainly a roof replacement at the jail. We have a problematic roof there, and then an EOC server room upgrades for HVAC obviously at the Emergency Operations Center.
One of the reports that we're asking you to also review and accept today is our countywide ADA transition plan and self-evaluation Just to give a little bit of the history, the county did their first ADA transition plan back in 1994 which included a self-evaluation. Throughout 2019 and 2020 we updated that, we hired a firm to come in and assist us in doing a significant survey on 11 most trafficked facilities throughout the county. 2,448 accessibility barriers were identified We've put together a program this first year allocates $500,000 towards that.
We're already in the process of executing those projects you may have saw a little earlier in September we replaced a whole sidewalk right along the admin building leading into the backside from the parking lot That is one of the first of several projects that we're going to be doing throughout this fiscal year. We are in the process right now of a project up at Lompoc and then we've got significant other path-of-travel related projects. We really want to focus these first couple of years on path-of travel, making sure that people can get from bus stops, from our parking lots into the building effectively through an ADA accessible location.
2:06 – 2:114 turns
And on the public works side, we did want to note that the ADA does require jurisdictions to make improvements to adjacent hardscape and sidewalk surfaces before pavement work can occur. For over 10 years, Public Works has actively coordinated ADA improvements throughout the county. The Board of Supervisors adopted the 2021 roadmap on August 18th 2020. This plan also includes hardscape construction to improve ADA accessibility throughout the county.
I think in future years you're going to see a lot more information from us, a lot more robust reporting on the accomplishments of our ADA programs. Again, I want to acknowledge both CSD Parks as well as Public Works. They've been doing the good work out there in the field doing a lot of different ADA related projects whether it's entrances And upgrades to restrooms or just path of travel to get people to their facilities. A lot of work in the right-of-way is ongoing, and we're going to continue to team together and make sure that not only your board but the community and all of our partners internally understand the good work that's being done for the ADA accessible improvements. So we'll be asking you to accept that report along with the CIP today.
The other report is again and we're a little bit behind both our partners in CSD parks and public works. We have a countywide parking lot repair program your board approved in 2019 us to go out to a consultant to perform A significant survey for us. Again, this has created a lot of data that's allowed us to continue to make decisions on project selection. We looked at 1,124,000 square feet of parking lots, driveways and what we call roadways just access points into our parking lots. I don't think it's any surprise to anybody that we have an interesting collection of aging parking lots that we struggle to continue to keep up to speed with. Our overall PCI was 66, which I think is a fairly good score.
But we've got a lot of work to do and 71% pavement, our parking lot pavements were rated in the good to fair condition. And that's a good message to us that we've got work to do on a lot of just maintenance and upgrades to kind of keep our levels in that particular category. Again, the good work that CSD Parks has been doing I know that Jill had indicated their program kicked off early in 2019 And I think Andrew will talk a little bit more about their efforts on the public works side as we move forward.
The category two projects for us in this year's CIP really are projects that are funded primarily outside of the general fund. And these are obviously many, we have a lot of ongoing projects such as again the MHRC project for Kyrielle, that's the Mental Health Resource Center for Be Well. Juvenile Hall Camera Systems, Probation Headquarters, again a project that we're working on extensively it's in the early design phases.
We've got a lot of work to do at the main jail for upgrades The fire station 27 project being funded by our fire district is well into design We hope to be able to go to final construction sometime in early 2021 and new Koyama And then again our fire dispatch center
And for public works these projects are described in full detail in the CFP document But the Public Works Transportation Division will continue to maintain 1,650 lane miles, 120 bridges and over 4,000 drainage structures. The Resource Recovery Division will continue to work on the next phase of the Tahequs landfill which is funded primarily by TIFDIS. And the Flood Control Division will continue their work on various basin improvement projects.
So our third category, and I think one of the most important and sometimes gets lost in just the overall Efforts that we have are projects that are previously funded and that are underway. I think this was important for us to communicate to your board, as well as the community today. We have a lot of projects that had been funded previously that are moving through the design to construction criteria. So our public safety radio network program is continuing to move forward.
There's been a variety of efforts there on the real estate side trying to move that project forward. Our courthouse roof replacement, that project is in design. We did a fairly extensive survey of the roof a couple of weeks ago. You may have saw the boom lift and all the inspections that were going on. That was a three-day effort. Renewable energy projects we talked about previously and then a couple of projects for fire and then ongoing work at the airport as well as our probation headquarters design.
2:11 – 2:174 turns
The Public Works Department will continue various bridge replacement projects, notably Floridale, Bonita, Foothill Low Water Crossings. These projects are funded primarily with Highway Bridge Program funds. Included in this section is the balance of the permanent work projects funded by both FEMA and FHWA to repair damage from the 190 degree flow. Laguna County Sanitation will begin phase one other plant upgrades. This is a $55.7 million project that replaces existing facilities that have met their useful lives, and expand treatment capacity.
This project was funded by combination of user fees and development fees. Flood control will continue to make basin improvements, notably capacity and efficiency modifications at Romero Debris Basin.
And CSD Parks, we have about 30 active projects at the moment. They total about $100 million. As Patrick mentioned earlier, we have about 6 million of that 100 million hitting this fiscal year and they're in, of course, various stages of development. A handful of those notable projects that range countywide are noted here A lot of activity going on at Kachuma. We have an amphitheater renovation, we have some RV area renovations. We are looking at redesigning the pool area and some improvements to ADA ramps, restroom ramps and such at the marina area. Halama there's a lot going on there since we have that new property with Bixby and from the Danger Mom Preserve through The Nature Conservancy expanding Park accommodations there.
Coastal trail as I mentioned earlier, beach access as well as trying to get the septic system or sewer system off the septic We're going full bore on that and should be completed with the design this year. That is being funded 100% by Caltrans, and then Vandenberg Village Park. We are still applying for grants for that park but we are making incremental progress this year so those are the notable ones for CSD parks.
And not on the public works side of the capital improvement plan includes projects that are needed but are currently unfunded. The Public Works Department has 4 departmental priorities. The Floridale Bridge involves the replacement of the existing bridge structure that was originally built over the Santa Ynez River in 1969 near the city of Lompoc. The bridge needs to be replaced to meet current standards and seismic retrofit guidelines.
Caltrans found the bridge to be seismically deficient and approved high-wage bridge program funds for the replacement project. The local share of this project is $1.2 million dollars and remains unfunded. The current deferred maintenance backlog is over $315 million. $4.9 million is needed to annually maintain the current pavement condition index of 56 on county roads.
Road multimodal path gap closure project will construct 1.1 miles of class one path along Modoc Road for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will connect the Auburn Trail at Encore Drive with the City of Santa Barbara's Class One Path at Calle de Los Amigos, which continues all the way to Arroyo Burro Beach. This project has received Cycle 4 ATP grant for $5.4 million, the county's required local match of $1.5 million remains unfunded.
Lastly, Project Clean Water is under state mandate to install trash amendments to storm drains at a cost of $220,000 per year. Current reserves are projected to be depleted by 2324.
Excuse me. CSD Parks currently has a $221 million capital need, 25% of that is actually maintenance needs. That includes about 24 million in pavement needs and the rest in maintenance. So the majority of what you'll see, about 6 million in park roadways and parking lots. That's an immediate need. We have a PCI rating of 54 which is just very mediocre. about a little over a million in ADA restroom and capacity upgrades, meaning for example at Rincon Lookout we have increased capacity and the restrooms really don't properly serve the number of visitors we have there.
What you'll see in the very right photo that used to be a lawn area at Goleta Beach and it's just a bunch of dirt now so that was a major irrigation break that we need to remediate. And then we have about $1 million that we'd like to put into play field lighting at Orchid Community Park I do want to thank the board for just granting so many deferred maintenance funds to CSD parks. It really helps us be able to put together major capital projects and also attain matching in grant funding, so thank you for that.
2:17 – 2:249 turns
One of the new sections that we've included in the CIP this year is kind of a long-term What are some of the significant emerging issues? And there are many. You've heard many about these, or about these in many of the other CIPs but really we've got I want to try to start to highlight some of those that could give not only the board but the community and other departments a sense of what are some of our long-term issues that we have. We're in the middle right now of a Chi Riel master plan and what comes out of that master plan will certainly require some long term commitment of capital in order to reconfigure that particular campus. Our public safety radio network, we're in the early stages of planning for that. We've set aside some funds but that will also need some future investments.
Again as I've highlighted in the document our Santa Barbara Courthouse one of the most important buildings in our community Right now we have a lot of aging related issues for the building and we really need to start thinking about how we fund those on a continuous basis as we move forward. We need to take care of that wonderful amenity for our county. Our main jail renovation That is certainly a facility that some of the pressure will be taken off by the development of our northern branch jail, but we need to turn our attention quickly to the main jail and retrofit it in order to meet our more modern standards.
CST Parks certainly has their Countywide Recreation Master Plan, which is an important document that has a lot of various projects and really alliterates their vision quite well. There's going to be a whole host of projects that they'll be bringing forward into talking about in future CIPs that come out of that document. And also the Kachuma Lake RV area renovations, it's a project that was funded or at least We're in the early stages of looking at options, design-related options for that facility. So this again will be a section, it's a section in the document that I think is very important. It looks like where we're going, what are some of the strategies we might need to get there? So we want to highlight that and you'll continue to see that throughout the year as well as our future CIP presentations.
The recommended actions today, we're asking for you to receive and file the detailed five-year capital program as well as the 2020 County Santa Barbara ADA transition plan and the 2020 General Services parking lot pavement management plan. We're again very appreciative of the opportunity to bring these projects and bring this program to the board today. And again, we want to thank our partners Both in CST Parks as well as Public Works and many of the other departments that provided really good input for us. We're gonna continue to take a collaborative approach, we're very proud of that. We are cultivating I think very good working relationships with all of our departments. There are many needs and I think ultimately we need to continue to gather our data and allow that data to help us make the best possible decisions that we can with the limited funding that we have.
Thank you very
much, Mr.
Zyrowski. Does that conclude your presentation?
Thank you. That's it. Yes,
thank you. And thank you, Mrs. Van Wee and thank you Mr. Mung. It was really helpful to see the perspectives from Public Works and Community Services as well. The matter is to the Board. Are there questions for staff? Supervisor Williams.
Well, I just want to say that this is a really exciting document. I mean, you know, not everybody feels like these construction projects are as sexy as others but I'm in my view it's it's exciting It's pretty pretty cool. And you No, we should continue to be looking for other opportunities to do more in my view especially in the energy efficiency retrofit arena.
But I do want to applaud you all from multiple departments for this important work.
Thank you. Supervisor Adam?
Well first of all you're welcome. I don't think we would have been doing any of that if I hadn't been pulling on this thread for eight years. Second thing is, I wouldn't congratulate yourself too much because You know we're, if you harken back to the board inquiry form number one this year at the budget hearings. It paints a dire picture of the amount of deferred and the acceleration of deferred so as Supervisor Williams said is it enough? No absolutely not.
And I suggest we try a little harder to arrest the acceleration of the deferred maintenance as we go on. Next year when the Board Inquiry Form 1 comes out, I predict it will be worse than the last year's. So we have to make that bottom curve come up. And that would be the spending. So and also, you know I noticed Ms Van Vuy I think said that our PCI was 56 on our roads and on slide 13 and I didn't see that but I did see where it says 66 on page 5 of the The board letter and I didn't know if the difference there was that was the parks roadways or And maybe the 56 is Is the overall roadways in the county?
2:24 – 2:3213 turns
Supervisor Adams to the chair, great question. Parks did not include the PCI in the document I believe that was general services and public works that put their PCI numbers in there. I just had the PCI number on hand for the meeting today. It'll be included in next year's CIP document.
Excellent. Yeah, I think that we should continue to be aware and maintain awareness of where we are relative to perfection or acceptance you know in the mid 70s is a really good goal and there's a lot of money between 56 and 70 Thank
You supervisor Adam are there other questions for staff Do we have any public comments on this item?
Chair Hart and members of the board, yes. We have one request to speak on this item and we are going to Andy Caldwell.
Chair Hart, members of the board, Andy Caldwell representing COLAB. One of the things I do appreciate Supervisor Williams is he does try to be a practical and honest environmentalist. And I appreciated in the last item he talked about the concept of greenwashing. Well, I want to bring that up here if we're to believe the AOCs and the Greta Thunberg's of this world and the green premises of the Green New Deal We have 10 years, 10 years to wean ourselves off of greenhouse gas emissions.
And of course California has pushed both to eliminate the use of gasoline and diesel powered motors or engines and also to end oil and gas production. There's quite a movement to end oil and gas production So that begs the question, this is a five-year plan. It's gonna take us halfway to the 10 year point of no return. So why is it that you guys aren't talking about how you're gonna wean yourself off of asphalt, concrete and get rid of your fleet of heavy duty construction vehicles including those at Tahequas Those that the fire department uses and those that Public Works uses in construction projects.
Where's your plan if we've got 10 years to to GHG Armageddon? And this is a five year plan taking taking up 50% of the remaining time we have on the planet Earth. Where is your plan? We know that concrete is one of the most intense greenhouse gas Emitters in terms of the kiln process and all the rest. We know that all of your roads are paved with asphalt just yesterday in Santa Maria I was driving around there spraying oil on those asphalt roads to maintain them.
And of course every single construction project and all of your vehicles at Tejiguas are all run by diesel. I think you need to you know what or get off the pot right now And tell us what is your plan. You shouldn't be approving this thing right now or else you're going to only have five years to save the planet. I think it's all hyperbole rhetoric and virtue signaling.
You're always wanting somebody else to pay the price that when it comes to your own budget, your own five year plans, your own equipment purchases You're nibbling around the edges with little commuter cars, but you really have no plan because we have no substitute. Where will you get the oil for the roads and the asphalt for the roads if everything is shut down in this state?
We honestly do deserve an answer. Thank you.
Thank you
Mr.
Caldwell. Supervisor Williams.
Well I'll let staff answer it if they want to but I'm so pleased to have Andy outmaneuver me to the left today. And you know, I mean it is a great point we should be approaching some of these with greater urgency. I do think it's it was exquisite to have Andy mentioned some things that actually is in the works though you may not have known it But I do think it speaks to the fact that we should not.
Just do this around the edges and virtue signal as he puts it, but that we should make really concrete and determined steps to reduce our particularly our base load of power and reduce our transportation impacts So, you know what I'm not prepared to reject this but what I really want to see on one of these one of these days is the biggest thing that the county could do to reduce our greenhouse emissions which is to build housing for employees in the South.
If we really want to reduce our GHG emissions most substantively the are impact commuting is the most egregious driver of both criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. And of course, it's the biggest part of our own sort of hypocrisy right? We want people to work but We sort of create a situation where because there's hasn't been enough housing production down here in the South that they typically live in mid County or North County, even when they work here.
So to me, the Holy grail of these CIP and something that I sure hope we will see on the next one is a substantive Housing project to house our own workers and therefore reduce our emissions, our commuting and increase our productivity and retention of critical workforce.
Thank you Supervisor Williams. Are there any other comments from board members? CEO Miyasato.
Board members, I just want to thank again General Services Public Works and CSD. Also Mr. Zurofsky because we've been struggling with how to present the CIP since I got here and he's lent some rationality and logic to the process working with our departments. We appreciate that. And I want to point the board to the fact that in the CIP on the end, the final pages, page 24 it lists I'm going to be bringing this out from time to time because when we talk about if there's any additional discretionary revenue that's not used for other things, we have over $300 million worth of projects that is on this list that we would like at some point to be funded.
And so this is a great way for us to know these are things that the board has given us direction in the past or the department feels necessary and this is the list we'll be using from time to time. So I just want to point that out, thank you.
Thank you CEO Miyasato and thank you Director Pell too for your leadership on this project. We appreciate your work. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you to the board for making all of this advance more quickly and more efficiently and more cost effectively. Any other comments from board members? Could we get a motion to approve the staff recommendations?
I move A through E in today's board letter.
2:33 – 2:448 turns
Thank
you all for that information. Which brings us now to item Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance to adopt remedies including administration fines for violations of county health officer orders pertaining to COVID-19.
Mr. Melekian, Ms. Hubbard, welcome. Who's going to begin?
Chair Hart and members of the board thank you for the opportunity today to talk with you about a proposed new ordinance applying administrative sanctions for violation of the Public Health Officer Order. This presentation is going to be made by OEM Director Kelly Hubbard I just wanted to introduce it on behalf of the CEO's office and again, remind everyone that two things. One is that currently with respect to public health officer orders there is on one end of the spectrum, the education advising counseling cajoling tools and on the far end of the spectrum as criminal sanctions and violations All of the various county departments have endeavored over the last seven months to bring public awareness and ensure adherence to the Public Health Officer Order.
But it is very clear as this pandemic continues to unfold that some middle ground of enforcement is needed And with that we're bringing you this proposal and I will now turn it over to director.
Good morning chair and supervisors thank you here to present the ordinance remedies for violations of County health officer orders pertaining to COVID-19 reason for this ordinance is related to Several future concerns resurgence related to COVID-19 concern for. A concept sometimes referred to as the twindemic, having both the flu and COVID-19 impact our hospital and healthcare system at the same time.
As we continue to open our community this increases potential exposure. Upcoming holidays, potential household gatherings in cold weather. As we have this cold weather and people for the holidays continue to gather inside unless safe conditions get in closer environments. Congregation of college students, general wariness of restrictions. General community wearing down on what those restrictions are Additionally, as we look at the blueprint for a safer community, we are currently in a red county, as indicated earlier. Still indicating substantive transmission and we want to prevent backsliding or moving and want to encourage moving forward to the orange, moderate yellow even better transmission risk tiers indicating that our community is open in a safe environment.
And that goes to the last point of RISE, our acronym there for Reopening in a Safe Environment. And this is part of that concept of being able to create a community that's safe for the reopening. Proposed ordinance, just a quick overview, adds Chapter 51. It applies to unincorporated county only. It provides administrative authority to the Director of Emergency Services per County Code, that is our CEO.
Effective until our local emergency proclamation is terminated or the ordinance is otherwise terminated by the board. Provides lesser restrictions than options currently available and establishes administrative fines, penalties for violating the health officer of 100, 200 or $500. Health officer orders of concern at this time. It does apply to any health officer orders, but at this time we're looking at health officer order and I want to provide a small correction from when we submitted this the health officer order was updated to 2020-12.12 on October 16 for just current reference and that is in regards to all gatherings are prohibited unless otherwise accepted and identifies allowed or restricted business operations and community services This is where our primary focus is.
Administrative fines are not anticipated for, for instance, individuals walking down the street without a mask, a family at the beach not wearing a mask, a household sitting at a park not wearing a mask. Really the focus is more on parties that exceed the number of people or households allowed, businesses that are not complying to the reopening guidelines such as capacity limitations or not enforcing protective measures for those individuals visiting their business.
Large groups at parks or beach, for instance, prohibitation of gatherings. Other parts of the health order like adult sports that are occurring in the parks. Just to give an overview of our violations and complaint process. Currently, as we move forward when we have a violation that's observed either by a community member or county RISE ambassadors, regulatory agencies, enforcement agencies, there's various ways to report that. Again, community members can report that through the complaint form on our recoverysbc.org website Our ambassadors are out in the community and our other partner agencies. If there is a violation observed, the first and foremost, and it will continue effort is on education and outreach.
Working to explain the restrictions, offering resources, collaborative processes to assist those businesses or individuals to find solutions, and a focus on multiple attempts before looking at towards enforcement. Enforcement actions are dependent on the jurisdiction enforcing I mentioned multi-agency collaborative process. What the violation is and how egregious that violation might be. I do want to note that state regulatory agencies are coming in and out of our communities, such as ABC or Cal OSHA. And sometimes they do go immediately to the citation concept. We encourage education and have provided them our resources but sometimes they will skip that part.
Just to review on our community education and outreach, we have our RISE Ambassadors. We are working with our city, county and other government agencies. We do have our regulatory agencies such as Environmental Health, City Code Enforcement in Cal OSHA. Enforcement agencies such as Sheriff's Department, Park Rangers. This is all a collaborative effort both for education and enforcement.
Various ways that we are getting information to the community on what those current restrictions are and what those recommendations are for opening in a safe environment. And all of these are various ways that we have conducted that outreach. Currently, county enforcement options that we currently have based on county code state law and procedures for due process. We do have civil concepts cease and desist and injunction may include fiscal penalties. These are referred to the district attorney's office by a local jurisdiction. And we do that through our Code Enforcement Work Group.
Criminal misdemeanor citation or arrest enforced by law enforcement and requires the prosecution from the District Attorney's Office. Administratively, currently what we have available to us as a county is license suspension or revocation. This is only by Environmental Health Services as it relates to those areas of business that they have regulatory authority over and I gave a few examples there, restaurants, bars, breweries If the ordinance was to pass, this would give us additional concepts application to all types of businesses and individuals. Those not necessarily already within our local enforcement authority would be restricted to county unincorporated once again and warning citations are a concept or an option that can be provided.
When looking at this, we did look at various counties and other agencies that were looking at enforcement and different methods to do this. Other concepts utilized was creating a new bureau or group utilizing law enforcement strictly or reassigning county employees. Instead, we're looking forward to empowering county employees within their current functions or capabilities within their jobs.
These are individuals who already have administrative or regulatory enforcement authorities They have knowledge and expertise in citation procedures, and it is already associated with their day-to-day activities. Anticipated violation or enforcement positions, excuse me. Agricultural Commission inspectors both weights and measures and agricultural commission the biological commission inspectors park rangers Environmental health services, enforcement for businesses with no associated local government agency.
Sheriff's deputies, non-criminal option again violations within public or private spaces that we may come across. Administrative structure if this was to pass we would continue forward with identifying and training our hearing officers currently looking at those county staff who already conduct hearings Development of the training for all positions involved, administrative procedures, logistics including virtual hearing concepts.
In summary we're looking to mitigate potential future COVID-19 surges and if a surge occurs removes us removes the need for coming back for an urgency ordinance supports safely reopening our community reduces likelihood of overwhelming our health care systems provides an alternative tool for enforcement And again, as emphasis our highest priority would still be on education and outreach.
Our recommended actions are as in the board report and on the slide shown here. I'll leave those up but if you have any further questions that ends my presentation.
Thank you Ms. Hubbard, Mr. Murlakian. Are there questions for staff?
I have one Mr. Chair.
Supervisor Lavinino.
2:44 – 2:5013 turns
I'm curious if we're doing any type of training for the individuals that might be out enforcing, whether they're from the Ag Commissioner's office or Park Rangers or anything like that.
Yes, Supervisor through the chair. We are working with those various departments if we were to move forward with this ordinance, we would definitely do training on what is the current health officer orders? What does that mean? Various areas or concepts of enforcement working with our partner agencies and making sure that they have all the current information and then that would be an ongoing process as health officer orders could change. We would make sure to set up a process of updating and educate continuing education online
Any other questions for staff.
Supervisor
Williams.
You know, I sort of asked this last time, but I want to put it back out there to sort of assure the public on both sides The culture we're trying to promote is one of education, education, education. And then if people are really going to be intransigent that's when you're levying fines and turning to enforcement. Am I encapsulating that correctly?
Correct, and Supervisor through the Chair. Additionally I would add that we have systems in place and would enhance that system for tracking amongst the various departments who would have responsibility to ensure that we are tracking that educational outreach and efforts before we lead into that enforcement concept.
I was just going to say, I mean, I am the last person maybe to always use Isla Vista as a bugaboo because I grew up there. I know that people can behave just as rationally in Isla Vista as other parts of the county. But I do think there is an obvious it's examples there and mind you frankly, the biggest parties. I've heard of in the summer work and IV but we're in carpentry and maybe that's because I live there at short-term rentals.
And there is a just a real need for at an enforcement tool that lies somewhere on the continuum between education and law enforcement. That's kind of a big gulf, right? Between that. I'm going to talk a little bit about some of the things that have happened in the last couple of weeks. Has obviously from my perspective in talking with our sheriff been a deterrent to using law enforcement as more than an education tool and there are going You know, someone outside not wearing a mask. That's not gonna necessarily cause a super spreader event but when that's a party right? When that's an establishment where there's a lot of people then that's a significant problem and documented so you know I've continuously asked public health to make our actions based on our actual data.
And our actual data indicates things like we don't have a successful contact trace outside, but we do have a ton of successful contact traces that were at home parties. So we do know that that's a factor in transmission and to me this is a tool to head that off from being a problem
Thank you Supervisor Williams. Supervisor Harmon?
Yes, I believe there will be some public comment and I'd like to reserve my deliberations for after that but I did have a question because I just got two public comments saying is IV being targeted or is this county why? And I think Supervisor Williams just answered that but I'd like to get it on the record as well.
And Supervisor Hartman, through the Chair, absolutely this is a countywide ordinance and it will apply equally throughout the county.
And if I might ask Dr. Malekian you're the best to answer this one what if we have $1,000 criminal penalty what is involved to actually follow through on that as opposed to an administrative fine? What's the difference in terms of administrative burden?
Supervisor Hartman criminal process. The criminal by the misdemeanor citation is a criminal violation and with it, it requires appropriate burden of proof. It requires a review by the district attorney's office to see whether it meets a criminal predicate. It requires ultimately theoretically at least an appearance before a judge And for the matter to be adjudicated it's time consuming and stretches out over time.
And it may or may not be appropriate for the situation where they're in administrative fine, the hearing officers as director Hubbard indicated will be drawn from from County staffers or other perhaps retired commissioners those kind of things we haven't I think it's also worth noting as we mentioned that warning citations were an option. The whole idea is to get people's attention to the fact that this is a serious business without actually perhaps unloading the full weight of
2:50 – 2:5812 turns
And I just wanted to amplify that point. Our first and primary method is always education. But this gives us another tool to educate if you don't, there are consequences. It gives us another consequence that we could actually do because the criminal penalty threshold is so high. So I think that's really important. It just it's education about consequences. We only want to use this in the rarest of circumstances.
Mr. Chair?
Yes, Supervisor Adam.
I would like to normally I would save the following statement for deliberations but I think because it's more along the lines of an alternative staff report and I'd like it to soak for a little while public comments going on so if you don't mind I'll just go ahead with that at this time
Yes, please go ahead.
Okay I wish that this board would entertain a different approach in dealing with the very real effects of the COVID pandemic. I would prefer that our county government reject the idea of draconian regulation for failing to comply with health officer orders. I offer you a document titled The Great Barrington Declaration This is a document that was authored by a team of clearly qualified medical experts.
It was signed by a long list of individuals with distinguished credentials in the medical and scientific community. I would encourage everyone to read the declaration, the basic point is that we are doing more harm than good using current control strategies. We should be opening up society for the people who are not in grave risk of death. And at the same time, we should be protecting those vulnerable populations who are at high risk.
But we're not doing this. Instead, we're treating this disease as if all people have an equal chance of death as a result of contracting it. We are not educating people about comorbidities that put them at particular risk. We emphasize gross case numbers instead of hospitalizations and death, both of which are few. Today we consider instituting fines for a person's daring to violate What I and many in our community consider to be unreasonable, unwarranted and unconstitutional infringements of our right of peaceable assembly. Freedom to travel, freedom to engage in commerce, and freedom to worship as we choose.
These all in the name of preventing a spread of a disease that we have learned since March is about as fatal as the normal flu. COVID-19 has become a pretext for the government healthcare complex to institute a command and control scheme on the people of Santa Barbara County and elsewhere. Meanwhile, suicides, domestic violence, and substance abuse has risen and will continue to degrade society long past the end of these lockdowns.
Please don't fall back on the old trope that we should adopt these regulations because everybody agrees. They don't. Recall that once upon a time, the authorities imprisoned a guy named Galileo because he was stating the heresy that the world was not flat. The proponents of the Flat Earth Theory wielded political power and they insisted that this science was settled.
Also recall the practice of bloodletting. The practice was not fully discredited until as late as the mid 20th century. I'm offering these two examples, as a reminder that people of goodwill who thought that they were right and thought so for a long time in the end weren't right at all. We are about to take an The extreme action of authorizing the finding of citizens for their failure to submit to an unelected health officer's order.
In my view, this is an abdication of our sacred duty as elected officials to be the guardians of freedom. This is a role that the people have entrusted to us as elected officials. And besides, this morning in item A2, the Masked and Mighty initiative we sought to educate, unite and incentivize. Now in this item our approach looks a lot more like intimidate and coerce.
So where are we now? We have successfully moved from purple to red, and we did it without the regulatory scheme that is before us today. Orange is around the corner. The proposed ordinance is totally unnecessary and unwarranted at this time, and I urge my colleagues to join me in declining to adopt this ordinance. Thank you.
Thank you,
Supervisor Adam. Supervisor Williams? Well I share some of the ideals that supervisor is articulating but it leads me to a different course of action. I very much agree that there is an imperative to getting in the orange or better and allowing people to be able to proceed with their life, to be able to have their children educated, to be able to have their jobs not threatened, to have their dreams of owning business not destroyed.
But all of those are contingent upon us being able to continue to make progress in reduction of transmission And whether we agree with the state framework or were against it that is the reality. And I think for all the reasons that were just articulated mental health and our economy and jobs and freedom that we have every need to be able to move forward to a lower tier, less restrictive framework so that we can open up our society. Of course, we need to do that safely And this, to me will give folks who use their discretion as in enforcement the ability to make sure that our future is not held hostage by a few irresponsible or unthinking individuals.
That could spread the disease and therefore hold the rest of us back from being able to live a normal life
Thank you supervisor. Oh, excuse me. Thank You supervisor Williams mr. Malkin did you have a comment?
Chair heard a point of clarification when I when I answered Supervisor Hartman's question. I use the term countywide. I just wanted to emphasize that that refers to the unincorporated area of the county
Thank you for that clarification. We'll go to public comment now. Madam Clerk, could you line up the speakers?
Yes, Chair Hart and members of the board we have 10 requests to speak on this item and we are going to begin with Tiana Traischelt to be followed by Ava Pargoshaw.
2:59 – 3:039 turns
Hi, my name is Tiana Trischel and I have lived in Isla Vista for about three years now. And I just would like to say that even if COVID is comparable to... Well let me backtrack. I am in support of the ordinance for Isla Vista. Even if COVID is comparable to the flu we have vaccines for the flu. We have the flu shot whereas we don't have a flu shot or we don' have a COVID shot And I would just like to say, we've had ordinances before in Isla Vista in the past for Halloween and they worked out really well.
I feel like it's been a lot safer during Halloween, so safer that students don't even stay in IV during the weekend. The other thing I would like to say, I just don't think we should be comparing apples to oranges talking about COVID deaths, comparing it to suicide when I think they're very unrelated. The other thing is that Yes, we have gone from purple to red in the county but let's keep that progress up by instituting this ordinance when Dr. Fauci has been saying like it's going to get a lot worse in the months of October to December so why not be proactive rather than being reactive about it? So I feel like this ordinance will benefit Isla Vista and all other unincorporated areas Like immensely and there's so many students in support of it.
If you go on forums where students talk about it we need this to ensure that the small area of Isla Vista doesn't become like a huge hotspot and affecting all other areas of Santa Barbara. I love Ivy and I don't want to see it like fall to pieces With all these infections, and I don't want Friendship Manor to be affected by all of the young people in there. I just feel like it's very needed and thank you. I'm just really passionate about this.
Thank you for your passionate comments, Miss Trisha.
We will now go to Ava Cargashaw to be followed by K Tims.
Hi, my name is Eva Cargosia. I'm a fourth year student at UC Santa Barbara. I strongly urge the board to implement an ordinance to fine COVID-19 health violations in unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara specifically Isla Vista. The extreme recklessness of many residents who don't wear masks and gather in large groups is endangering our community and for those who are safely social distancing we should not be the ones who bear the consequences while the violators receive no repercussions. Images and videos of parties consisting of 70 plus people have been featured in news outlets which reflects poorly on not only UCSB but on Santa Barbara County and its leadership.
UC Santa Barbara housing was shut down partly due to the increasing COVID cases from the unsafe situation which has caused me and many other residential assistants to be laid off a week before we were scheduled to move in leaving many of us houseless food insecure and financially insecure. This issue has had severe repercussions in many different ways, which is why I urge you to enact this ordinance to fine COVID-19 violators.
Thank you.
We will now go to Kaye Timms to be followed by Andy Caldwell.
Good afternoon. My name is Kaye Timms, I have Kaye's Country Kitchen. I'm calling in this afternoon because I'm concerned about line item four about charging penalties and fees for any infractions against the health department. I feel like the scrutiny in the situation that small businesses are in and how things, the atmosphere around That I think it would be counterproductive and I think it's just not the right time to do something like that.
So I say no on online item 4, thank you.
Thank you Miss Thames.
We will now go to Andy Caldwell to be followed by Yasmin Salari.
3:04 – 3:096 turns
Chair Hart, members of the board, Andy Caldwell representing COLAP. You know one of the things that I find most fascinating is that most all of you board members take your masks off every time you need to speak. And I'm wondering what would happen if your health officer walks into a restaurant or a fast food place and the person taking off Who's taking the orders or the person giving the orders takes their mask off when they're going to speak.
Would you find the business? Would you find the employee would you find a patron and what example are you giving that every time you need to speak, you take your mask off I don't want to pick on good old Michael Gazzone down there but I watch your boards very often And this morning he had his mask off about half the time and there was nobody around him. He wasn't talking to anybody, took it off half the time. If your health officer walked into your own room would he be fined or would the county be fine?
You know the other thing Thanksgiving's coming up Christmas is coming up are we going to have neighbors saying hey there's a bunch of cars parked next door We want the health officer to come in and break up Thanksgiving or break up Christmas? These are the practical things you need to talk about. How does this work in a real world? You know, I believe at least originally, originally the order was any business that has more than 10 employees, I think it was, or more than 25 Everybody had to wear a mask.
Barney Moleculan, I didn't see his mask. Do you require everybody walking into that hearing room to have a mask on the entire time? And what is your justification for taking them off when you're speaking? As you well know we can't sing in church because when you speak or sing that's when you're projecting From your breath or through your breath, whatever viral particles you might have in them.
Finally I totally agree with Supervisor Adams' speech. We've done a couple of shows on the Great Barrington Declaration. The original declaration was signed by professors, eminent professors from Oxford, Harvard and Stanford and within a week 15 thousand Very prominent health care professionals, research scientists. Doctors and academics signed on to that 15,000 highlighting the damage Governor Newsom and even Fauci have done especially to the poor in our society. So I'd sure like you to tell us about your protocol for taking your mask off when you're speaking and how that applies to the rest of the world. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Caldwell.
We will now go to Yasmin Salari to be followed by Isabel Mitchell and I would like to note for the record that chair has now closed the public comment period.
Hello everyone, my name is Yasmin Salari and I'm the current UCSB Associated Students External Vice President for Local Affairs. I am here in support of the urgency ordinance that you are considering today. As the ECPLA promoting public safety and community well-being in Isla Vista is my utmost priority. I along with a majority of the UCSC undergraduate student population currently live in Isla Vista And we have been experiencing the negative consequences of some people's reckless behavior in regards to COVID-19.
Four days ago, we received an emergency notification from the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department that there has been two separate clusters of positive COVID-19 cases in privately owned fraternity and sorority houses in the Isla Vista community. This is not a recent occurrence. From July 3rd to August 13th, COVID- 19 cases in Isla Vista rose by over 500%.
Even though some Isla Vista residents might be under the false impression that their actions only affect themselves, in reality their actions are endangering the local community as well as postponing the reopening of our county. The urgency ordinance is widely supported by both students and long-term community members. It is imperative for our county to intervene to protect our community at this crucial time but bypassing this urgency ordinance. Thank you for your time, consideration and continued efforts to respond to the needs of our community.
Thank you Miss Solari.
We will now go to Isabel Mitchell to be followed by Spencer Brandt.
3:09 – 3:166 turns
Good afternoon, Honorable Supervisor. My name is Isabel Mitchell. I am a third year communication and economics student with a minor in writing at UC Santa Barbara. Today, I'm speaking as the chair of UC Santa Barbara Public Safety Commission and also the president of Gouchers for Transparency. Over the last few months we have all seen the real impact of COVID-19 in the news, in our hometowns everywhere In Isla Vista, what we're seeing is a unique storyline. It's a lack of accountability and even procedures in place for enforcement to handle major gatherings.
Like I mentioned, what we're seeing in Isla Vista is very complicated storyline and I emphasize the words of my friend Yasmin about all the comments that she had made. What we're seeing is that a lot of UCSB students are actually promoting safe behaviors whether they're remotely In UC Santa Barbara or actually in Isla Vista. And they're wanting the people to be held accountable for their dangerous actions. We continue to see not only UCSD students, SBCC students and out-of-towners risk the lives of community members. Partially also what we're seeing is a result of unethical marketing tactics by some leasing companies that actually promoted their houses by posting on UCLA and Harvard housing groups to say if you don't want to study at home and lose the college experience come to Sunny Isla Vista Some leasing companies have allegedly held their renters accountable, but the ones that aren't promoting these behaviors are also allowing for the residents to continue partying.
So now we have out-of-towners and freshmen who want to have that college lifestyle in the middle of a world pandemic because our President Donald Trump and social media has said that COVID-19 does not affect young people and it is simply a flu. That is clearly proven false It is a privileged and selfish decision right now to go out and socialize without a mask in COVID procedures without considering safety precautions. Young people are asymptomatic super spreaders. They go to grocery stores gas stations all these places in Santa Barbara County and beyond. There are students who are immunocompromised and your own peers who are immunocompromised also potentially don't know they have underlying health conditions because we don't have good health insurance in the United States that can make contracting COVID-19 extremely dangerous.
So the issue here, police are being told not to issue any tickets. We're struggling with no procedure in place other than reporting gatherings on social media and a form that they get educated and sent a letter. Great! We need to be able to report unsafe gatherings and immediately know that there will be repercussions beyond education and have the power to shut these events down. I really do appreciate the county's focus on education it is extremely important However, we do need a process as some of the supervisors and the CEO has said to mitigate these egregious actions. So what am I asking you here today to do? I'm asking the board to vote yes. I'm voting-asking to vote yes to have a procedure in place to prevent these egregious super spreader gatherings.
I am asking you to vote yes to statewide. I am asking you to vote yes to our college campus sooner than later. I m asking you vote yes so that businesses can open safely and not be superspreader areas I'm asking you to vote yes so we can all return to our lives sooner or later. And Honorable Supervisor Peter Adams, I appreciate your concern but I also would like to question the validity of your sources in this context. These claims you are making...
Thank You Ms. Mitchell
We will now go to Spencer Brandt to be followed by Jonathan Abboud
Hello Chair Hart and members of the board. My name is Spencer Brandt I've lived in Isla Vista for five years and I'm the president of the Community Services District though not representing them here today. I really don't think we can say this enough even if many young people will only experience mild symptoms from COVID-19 some of us will become seriously ill.
Personally I have friends who live in Isla Vista that have experienced serious symptoms one has even had to become hospitalized I'm really proud of the vast majority of residents who are practicing physical distancing, wearing masks and are doing the right thing. The Community Services District is funding socially distant entertainment arts and cultural programming for residents during this upcoming Halloween weekend in partnership with Lucidity Festival. Residents will be eligible to win cash prizes for staying home and celebrating safely with only their immediate household.
Though this is a little bit of an unconventional approach for a small local government agency to take, I think that it is well worth the investment and I believe it will pay off by making our community more healthy and safe. Students as we've heard want to be a part of the solution they want to help report violations of the health officer order one resident said it's not snitching when we're in a global pandemic but if there are no consequences To reporting it is only understandable that the community becomes frustrated.
What I've also heard from students and residents is that the enforcement of this health order should not be done with law enforcement officers. That's just not appropriate at this time for my conversations with law enforcement officers seem to agree that they don't want to be the ones involved in enforcing this. So if this ordinance passes we really need to work together to find a non-law enforcement response UC Santa Barbara and the county have engaged some property management companies, and I really want to applaud those that are being a part of the solution and have taken corrective action when their tenants are violating the health order. However, other property providers have refused to be engaged, and some have shown outright disdain for public health officer order rules.
Property providers need to ensure a habitable living environment for their residents. As we think about enforcement, I think this is a good place to start We also work together to prevent outbreaks because our case numbers affect our entire region's economy and our entire community's health. Thank you for considering this.
Thank you, Mr Brandt.
We will now go to Jonathan Abboud to be followed by Alia Skye.
3:16 – 3:229 turns
Thank you Supervisors for having this item on the agenda today. My name is Jonathan Abboud, I've lived in Isla Vista since 2010 to 10 years now and I represent the community for the last six years as a trustee on the City College Board but not representing the board today. As someone who lives here and who represents this place and works here everyone I've talked to across the board supports something like this ordinance and I'm glad that it's being considered today Hope is going to pass because again, almost anybody I've talked to in Isla Vista has expressed a need and a support for something like this months ago.
So now we're getting to it now but this has been a longstanding issue in the community and I think Spencer and Izzy and Yasmin others who have spoken have clearly demonstrated that. The majority of people who are following the rules But the majority also wants to have real consequences that's not based on law enforcement and is not just more and more education for the small number of people who are violating these rules.
It's been many months of education at this point, if you haven't heard of COVID-19 and that you shouldn't gather, I mean, you know, you must have been living under a rock because it's since March. And so if this passes, one warning is good but my opinion is there need to be real invisible consequences afterwards for the tenant and the property owners Who are operating as businesses essentially in Isla Vista for these illegal gatherings. Especially with the knowledge and history of how zero tolerance the county has been in Isla Vista with parties, on days like Halloween and Deltopia in the past when there was not a public health emergency occurring or an immediate threat to people's lives.
Just this month we've had multiple reports of very large gatherings and the general feeling is there have been no repercussions by That's the feeling of the community. I think like something like this would solve those feelings and a change in the status quo is needed, so thank you for voting yes.
Thank you Mr. Abboud.
We will now go to Aaliyah Skye to be followed by Mary Spallino.
Hi, my name is Aliyah Skye. I currently serve as the External Vice President of Statewide Affairs for Associated Students at UCSB. So I represent the about 23,000 undergraduates at UCSB and I'm calling in full support of the ordinance for the unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara specifically Isla Vista And myself and the other ASSX also wrote a long letter in support of this ordinance that we sent in.
So I encourage you guys to read that letter and to respect the wishes and voices of students, thank you.
Thank you Ms. Skye.
We will now go to Mary Spallino to be followed by Chelsea Barnes who is our final speaker.
Okay.
Go ahead, Mary.
Okay good afternoon my name is Mary Spolino and I reside in Orkut and my husband Jim and I along with our partners Alfonzo and Amy Curdy own a small Italian restaurant in Orkut. As a restaurant owner in Santa Barbara County I wanted to voice my opinion about what I perceive to be negative and sadly punitive measures that are being Proposed by way of fines on businesses that the county would impose on those they decide aren't following the rules set down by the health department.
I have to ask, is this how we want to treat our taxpaying businesses that are doing their best to follow all the rules that constantly change? Most businesses that I know are jumping through hoops to keep their businesses viable while following all health code requirements Please know most importantly that we don't want anyone's health compromised. And secondarily, we want to continue to be able to make ends meet in a very tough economic situation.
It is extremely hard to make moves and switch gears each time you're told we can be inside then no, we can't be inside then it's we have to be outside and then it's 25% okay to be inside And as a restaurant in order to make these changes on the fly and accommodate our customers so that they're comfortable. And to also continue to create an ambience as well as serve great food, it has become an endeavor that magicians practice many years to achieve.
Please know that we have already been fined quote unquote by COVID-19. And we would deeply appreciate those of us working hard to provide jobs And a great eating experience. And tax revenue for our county, but the county doesn't impose these unfair fines. We are all continuing to work hard together for the sustainability and betterment of this wonderful county we all call home while helping each other out by not punishing each other.
I appreciate you listening to my comments. Thank you so much.
3:23 – 3:3111 turns
Hello, my name is Chelsea Barnes. I'm a student at UCSD, a fourth year student. I am a Bio and Sociology double major with a double minor in French and Poverty and Inequality. I would like to say that I am in support of implementing an urgency ordinance in Isla Vista for the sake of the public health of our community as well as the safety of our community. I find it incredibly reckless and most importantly selfish to use people's traumas and situations of domestic violence To highlight and exemplify poorly researched claims to promote getting back to what we consider normal. No matter what you believe about COVID-19, it is never okay to cherry pick which healthcare professionals you will listen to in regards to a global pandemic, epidemic in which people have lost their lives.
People of all ages and all health backgrounds have been impacted by COVID-19 and there's still no way to tell who could experience extreme symptoms or who could even die This is not an issue regarding the economy or your income, and we want a healthy community so that we can continue to thrive. There's no way that we can continue to promote your businesses and going out into the real world shopping and eating in restaurants back to what you consider normal if people are continuing to get sick and cases are still rising because people are being reckless. Being proactive is what's going to return us to normalcy And not ignoring the issue and trying to rush into something that the public is not ready for. Please vote yes to protect our community, our health and our lives.
Thank you.
Thank You Ms. Barnes and thank you for those public comments. The matter is back to the board. Supervisor Hartman?
I had some additional questions for staff. Doctor melekian do you know how many criminal citations or criminal penalties have been assessed. All part.
Can can I add an addendum please don't include parking tickets and those in that number because. That skews the numbers substantially.
So chair and supervisors at this time, there's various enforcement efforts that have occurred through the D.A.' 's office as well as the sheriff's office. And so there are several civil cases that have been filed through. Sorry, it's
the reason we talk without a mask is so people can hear us.
So there has been several civil cases filed through the DA's office. Some of those have been resolved once filed, some of those have moved forward. Additionally, the Sheriff's Office has issued Specific to Isla Vista, 95 citations issued associated with noise ordinance not specific to the health officer order. Additionally there are some efforts that have been issued and I apologize I have to pull it up on my phone additional citations that are related to health officer order by the Sheriff's Office primarily related to those individuals violating isolation and quarantine orders
But I think the point is that we don't issue criminal penalties of $1,000 or whatever the period of time was for confinement. That's a very rare occurrence and in fact it's like the nuclear option, I think. Dr. Melekian, I also want to ask if you could talk about discretion a bit?
Supervisor Hartman, as the public comment and the discussion that has gone on both locally and nationally indicate this is a continual balance between trying to maintain public health and trying to ensure the maintenance of individual liberty. And finding that balance, particularly in this challenging time is proving to be a real line walker for law enforcement. And the issue of what are we trying to accomplish which is to keep people from gathering, to keep people from violating public health officer order is the primary objective and the exercise of discretion as you rightly refer As law enforcement's effort to be that public presence, to be the if you will the extension of government to say this is what the public health officer's order is.
This is the purpose of that order but not to say as I said earlier that we want the full weight of the criminal justice system to land on top of you. And the focus of this ordinance as I started out saying is really to help find that middle ground. Law enforcement officers or the other county employees who might be park rangers, environmental health officers, the other people who are also involved in this kind of enforcement do the same thing. They go out and make a decision about whether or not does this warrant the issuance of a citation Or will the verbal warning, will the education, will just the presence of government alone affect the desired outcome?
So I have then some comments I'd like to make. Every board meeting I drive down the 101 in my car and it's easy to speed. There aren't... And I'm sometimes a little late But I know that the CHP is there, and I don't speed because I might get a ticket. So it's not that I actually have the encounter but I realize that that's a risk. And I shouldn't speed for its own sake but that additional reminder that I'll get a ticket even later.
That really drives it home for me. So, it plays an important role and I think that's what this is. I have 25 comment letters and we heard from a number of people representing larger groups of people including Associated Students, the CSD, and Gauchos for Transparency. And what they're telling us is that they have education all of these organizations are On the ground, I've never seen students so concerned and activated and invested in contributing to their communities. And they are doing everything they can. And Kelly Hubbard, I can't thank you enough for all the work you're doing with the Ambassador Program in supporting these educational efforts. There are a lot of things that we need to do, and I think it's important for us to And simply education, which we have an enormous amount of and everybody has a consistent integrated message colored locally.
I applaud that but we need something. If we don't have it, if we don�t listen to what this community is telling us they need, not only going up to the next level but going back, backsliding. And so I don't know how we can't respond and I would like to make one final plea in Isla Vista in particular. It is an unincorporated county-wide ordinance but Isla Vista is in my district I'm going to talk a little bit about what we're doing.
And instead of having a penalty, people go in and have education and can do community service. We can link this to that restorative justice program and I very much would like to see that happen and I just want to get that on the record today. So I'm listening to what 25 emails or eight commenters said we need this in our community to keep the county safe.
Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Are there other comments? Supervisor Williams? Mr. Chair? We can let Supervisor Williams go first. Go ahead.
3:31 – 3:373 turns
Well one of you can go first. Rochambeau virtually. I got it.
Okay, I want to start by saying that I take COVID very seriously. It's hit my family. It has hit my staff. I visit my 85 year old father every day. But, um, I think we have to go back to what department item number two told us today. We learned that we have 12 people hospitalized with COVID. We still can't get a breakdown of who those people are or what their pre-existing conditions were.
But we have 12 people out of 450,000 people in this county that are hospitalized. You know, we had a quote unquote outbreak in Isla Vista and I don't know what all those kids were tested for. I'm sure they've probably you know if they're Well, we'll let that go. Yeah don't go there thanks. But we got to put it into perspective and at some point you know we have to allow people to kind of get back to reality a little bit.
I'm not advocating, I wear my mask obviously I'm not wearing it here indoors with one other person. But you know, I'm a mask wearing person when I go out in public and I've in fact some of the people that have actually spoken today opposed to this. I've been to their establishments and they're following the rules that are in place and I wear my mask when I go eat at their establishments so you know I just think this is one more Notching the belt of government, you know kind of putting our foot down.
And honestly I think it's a well-intentioned ordinance as all of ours are but at some point you know it's going to there's gonna be a problem there's some unintended consequences you might you know who knows what it's gonna be if you have maybe too aggressive of a person that's writing the ticket or You know, you've got a nosy neighbor that doesn't like too many cars parked out in front of your house so they're calling because you've got too many people over.
I just think that there's gonna be problems down the road. So for me, I'm not gonna be able to support this. I really appreciate the students who showed up from Isla Vista that are very concerned about their, about Isla Vista and again it's, I think what's worked in Santa Maria has been education And continued push to get people to wear a mask where they should, to socially distance and to wash their hands.
I just can't go there this far. Thank you.
Well, I empathize with folks who have concerns. But I do believe that it's important and serves the goal of unshackling society by moving towards the orange or even to the yellow. And that will need some recourse to be able to deal with. Particularly egregious examples without her without having to turn to criminal enforcement. You know, Mister Jonathan boots comments I thought were the most persuasive to me is that Every year we cracked down all the partying in Isla Vista. Why would this year, the year where it would have the most imperative towards saving lives and saving our businesses and jobs? Why would we not crack down this year of all years?
You know, on parties that in this case are not just a normal basis. They're an inconvenience sometimes in extreme cases of public health threat but in this year they are very much a public health threat so I thought that was pretty persuasive In response to the concerns that have been raised, I want to just ask staff even if you just do so in a summary form.
I'd like to get emailed what the citations are that take place. That way I as a supervisor can try to make some judgment of whether this is being. Used as we intended or whether as some individuals have mentioned their most I think most We're going to be reviewing all of the citations that were submitted by the enforcement staff of the counties. You know, that's ultimately our responsibility so I would like like to just have every citation and take
3:37 – 3:4010 turns
Supervisor Williams to the chair. Do you mean should this get? Adopted by the board you would like us to to give updates to the board on all the administrative citations That
was that would be my request Thank You all I don't see this as a crackdown I see this as an incremental nuanced tool that will add to the range of enforcement and Activities that we have available to us, and I think it is being proactive. Anticipating the reality that in other parts of the country and the globe there is a significant dangerous second wave of the virus that is occurring right now. We are fortunately at a good place and our trend is is in a positive direction because of the commitment of all the people in this county to be careful and concerned about others but Some people who are not getting the message despite enough time and enough penetration of that message for people to understand what is expected and required in this moment.
And there will be, as this pandemic unfortunately continues, there isn't any credible reason to think that we are not going to be in a similar place for a very long period of time. We have to be adaptable and And understand that the challenges will change over time as people get fatigued. So we're going to continue to do education, The last tool but it's an important tool to have and it's we're going to rely on the discretion of the folks who are being given this authority. And I appreciate Supervisor Williams idea that we get regularly reporting back about the level of activity once the ordinance is in place.
And you know ideally this isn't just another small step forward in what is truly a grassroots community based response to the pandemic that has been enormously successful to this point and we want that to continue. Would anyone like to make a motion? Supervisor Herndon?
I would move A through E on our staff recommendation.
Second. Motion has been made and seconded, any discussion of the motion? Supervisor Adam was that a click
Yeah, well I could I was just gonna say aye but I will say that people That disagree with this who I think there are many many many of Should watch this and remember it next time they have to go to a ballot box
Thank You supervisor Adam Madam clerk. Would you please call the roll?
Mr.. Adam
No No
Mr. Williams I miss Hartman I chair heart I motion passes 3 to 2.
That concludes item number 4 will now recess to close session County Council could you please read the items for consideration.
3:40 – 3:473 turns
Chair and supervisors yes I will first like to thank Deputy County Council Kelly Kim in our division chief Michelle Montes who are with us in the audience today and we're part of the team that brought this to you so thank you for their work Today in closed session, the board is agendized to consider three areas. The first is three related cases of existing litigation.
County of Santa Barbara versus Purdue Pharma which is within multi-district litigation currently housed in the northern district of Ohio. And then there are two bankruptcy cases related to that. In re Purdue Pharma, which is a bankruptcy case in the Southern District of New York and in Ray insists therapeutics which is in the bankruptcy court for the District of Delaware. The board also has two real property matters today.
The first of the two involves multiple parcels of property, which in plain English are at a parking lot at 1016 Santa Barbara Street. Another parking lot between East Figueroa Street and East Carrillo Street. And then a property at 117 East Carrillo Street. The negotiations would be with the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara. And then, the second real property item involves real property within the county's Calle Real campus which is bounded to the north by Cathedral Oaks and to the south by Calle Real. The negotiating party on that is Food Bank of Santa Barbara County. My estimate for closed session is about 45 minutes.
Okay, thank you Mr. Ghazani. We will return from closed session a little after one o'clock. One thirty ish.
Yeah. Music Hi.
3:52 – 4:582 turns
you Thank you.
Good morning. you Yeah. you the board. Hello. Yeah. Thank you. you the board. You. you you Thank you. Yeah. Yeah. you the board. Hi, everyone. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you.
5:05 – 5:073 turns
you We're now reconvening the Board of Supervisors meeting of October 20th, 2020. Will County Council please report out from closed session?
Chair and supervisors, today in closed session the board considered three broad areas. The first was several related cases of existing litigation. The county of Santa Barbara versus Purdue Pharma et al which is consolidated into multi-district litigation as well as two related bankruptcy cases. One is In Re Purdue Pharma and the other is In Re Insys Therapeutics. There are no reportable actions from that item. The board also had two separate real property negotiations The first concerning downtown Santa Barbara parcels at 1016 Santa Barbara Street, 117 East Carrillo Street and then a further parking lot between East Figueroa Street and East Carrillo Street. The parcel numbers are listed in the agenda. Negotiating party was Housing Authority of this County of Santa Barbara.
There are no reportable actions on that item. And then there was a second real property negotiation concerning county-owned property on the county's Calle Real campus, which is bounded to the north by Cathedral Oaks Road and to the south by Calle Real. The negotiating party is Food Bank of Santa Barbara County and there are no reportable actions on that item.
Thank you Mr. Guzzone. That concludes our business for the day and we're now adjourned to Tuesday November 10th 2020