BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 November 10, 2020

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:0622 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:34 · ≈ 9:03 AM

I will call to order the November 10, 2020 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Will the clerk please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:41 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Ms. Hartman? Here. Mr. Adams?

GuestDas WilliamsProposed · by introduction3:44 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:45 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Mr Lavinino?

GuestDas WilliamsProposed · by introduction3:47 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here!

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:48 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Mr Williams?

GuestDas WilliamsProposed · by introduction3:50 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:50 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Chair Hart?

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈23s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:51 · ≈ 9:03 AM

Here at this time please stand and join the board in pledging allegiance to the flag

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:19 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Our

next item of business is approval of the minutes from the October 20th, 2020 meeting. Is there any discussion? Could I get a motion to approve?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.864:29 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Move approval.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:31 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Thank you. Is there a second? Second. Motion's been made and seconded. Any discussion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction4:40 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.824:44 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction4:44 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.824:46 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction4:47 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Mr. Williams? Aye. Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:49 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction4:49 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:51 · ≈ 9:04 AM

CEO Miyasato, is there a CEO report today?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:54 · ≈ 9:04 AM

Chair Hart, there is a short report this morning and that was just to let us let the board and public know that last week we were notified that the county was recognized with three 2020 Challenge Awards from the California State Association of Counties and will be I'm for their Barone Ranch restoration project in which Public Works purchased more than 1,000 acres known as Barone Ranch along the Gaviota Coast to secure a buffer zone adjacent to our landfill.

Human Resources was recognized also with a challenge award for their matching program during the disaster and that was the county established an employee job match program to temporarily reassign county And local mutual aid employees to specialized positions. And the third one was the district attorney's arson task force was recognized with a merit award, and the task force has successfully educated, prevented, investigated arson cases. So we'll be providing more information in the weeks to come but that's kudos to our county staff to be recognized of all those entries.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:23 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Congratulations to Public Works and Human Resources and the District Attorney's Office on that well-deserved recognition. Madam Clerk, are there any... Mr. Chair? Yes.

0:06 – 0:196 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:35 · ≈ 9:06 AM

I'd like a...I can go before or after the clerk but I've got a short announcement about Veterans Day.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:41 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Yes, Supervisor Lavinino please.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:44 · ≈ 9:06 AM

Okay, thank you. So tomorrow is as we all know Veterans Day and we're going to be celebrating here outside the Joe Centeno Government Building here at 511 East Lakeside Parkway from 11 to 2 tomorrow. We'll have a drive-through. We're not able to do stand down this year so we're gonna have a drive through event where we're going to be handing out bags of goodies they'll have gift cards essentials They'll also have a contact list for services with housing, mental health and other benefits that will be available. So I also want to give a big shout out to Coast Hills. They dropped off a donation of $5,000 Sunday while we were putting together the bags.

So tomorrow from 11 to 2 outside the Joe Centeno building it's open to all veterans. There will be walk up available and drive through and it's all going to be COVID safe. Thanks to our county team here that came and gave us instructions on how to do it properly. So I want to just give a big shout out to our veterans, and also I want to thank Supervisor Hartman who posted this on her Facebook page and getting the word out for me so thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:58 · ≈ 9:07 AM

Thank You supervisor 11 you know thank you for always representing the county well with that event and pivoting as you needed to this year in light of the COVID pandemic so thank you next item is the Clerk, or do you have any announcements or changings to our agenda today?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction8:16 · ≈ 9:08 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board. Yes I have three quick announcements this morning. I would like to start off by reminding members of the public who are participating in our board meeting today if you would like to make public comment on any item on today's agenda or on general public comment you could do so by phone please call 805-568-2240 And state your name, your phone number and which item you would like to speak on. And we will call you at the appropriate time that number will also be scrolling on top of your screen.

I'd also like to remind the public to please make every effort to be available and mute all streaming devices once it is your turn to speak. My second announcement is on administrative item number 24. We received a continuance request from the department. This item is from Public Health. It is to consider recommendations regarding a request to ratify execution of emergency occupancy agreement with Best Western

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction9:12 · ≈ 9:09 AM

Plus and Senina Inn & Suites, and this continuance request is to continue this item to the November 17th agenda. And my last announcement this morning is just to announce that we posted an addendum to the agenda on Friday, adding departmental item number five to the agenda. This is from Community Services. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding encampments of persons experiencing homelessness in Isla Vista and a temporary emergency sheltering option for COVID-19 response. And all these announcements are also available online. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed9:49 · ≈ 9:09 AM

Thank you, Madam Clerk. Next item is approval of the administrative agenda. Do any board members request to pull any items from the administrative agenda? I have A9, A16 and A34 already requested to be pulled. Are there others that would like to be pulled? All right, Madam Clerk could you please read Item A9 into the record?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction10:13 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Yes, Chair Hart and members of the Board. Administrative item number nine is from County Council it is to consider recommendations regarding an outside council contract with Churchwell White LLP and there is a fourth this vote required on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed10:27 · ≈ 9:10 AM

Supervisor Williams? Well, I've been thinking about our last discussions about the Redistricting Commission and trying to deal with the fact it's awkward thing where we are. The agency approving the funding for this essentially the technical staff and support or. An independent redistricting commission and so think it's a little weird that we are making the decision for their attorney when there's only five of them and before, and they're not making the decision.

So I think of course on the other hand it would be a bad idea if we don't make any decision because then they wouldn't have an attorney for their meetings so my suggestion of how to deal with that is simply to award this but On a temporary basis just till their December meeting when they will have 11 individuals and then they should be able to either pick this firm or pick another firm or whatever they want to do.

Are there other comments from board members? Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8611:54 · ≈ 9:11 AM

Yeah, if that was a motion I would second it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:00 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Then I will make the motion that we approve A9 but only until the first meeting when they have 11 individuals.

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction12:12 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Excuse me,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:14 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Supervisor Adam.

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction12:15 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Mr Chair?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:16 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Yes, Supervisor

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction12:17 · ≈ 9:12 AM

Adams. I think that we need to let them have a little longer than one meeting. In theory they're not going to have any And I don't know how it's going to work over there with staff, you know worker packets or any of that. But I'd hate for them to get to their first meeting and get blindsided and feel pressured to do something right away that they might not be comfortable without thinking about. So I would say maybe not later than January 25th or something like you know the end of and it should January give them some time to process it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed13:01 · ≈ 9:13 AM

I'm okay with that. I think that's that's a fair point Supervisor Adam So let's let's do that so would that be January 31st is that we're talking about?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction13:11 · ≈ 9:13 AM

Well, that works for me. I mean if you want to tighten it up a little bit that works for me too all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed13:16 · ≈ 9:13 AM

right well Mr.. Ghazani Chair and supervisors the contract is drafted with a 30-day convenience termination And I understand the goal of the board here of having the Independent Redistricting Commission have choice another way to do that rather than have a termination date pre established in this contract would be to approve the contract recognizing and endorsing the right of choice by the Independent Redistricting Commission, and if they say we want somebody else then we would bring back somebody else and But that would be my recommendation. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed13:49 · ≈ 9:13 AM

mean, it would be my preference just that it automatically end so that they make a decision not you know not a non-decision. You know let them make the decision and if they like the services that they provided in the first two months then let them do this. I don't really know anything about this firm either good or bad But I think it should be the decision of the commission.

And so what is the date in your motion? January 31st, 2021. Okay and is that acceptable to the seconder? I

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8614:28 · ≈ 9:14 AM

would second that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:30 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Is there any other discussion on this item? Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed14:35 · ≈ 9:14 AM

Mr. Chair and Supervisors just so I don't have to ask about the mechanics of this again, I understand that January 31st. I think one way to accomplish that even with leaving the motion as is is to leave To me or the CEO rep on this which is a CEO Anderson to initiate termination on that date absent, you know absent a request from the independent redistricting Commission and That way that we would all be square on the mechanics of that. There is a 30-day termination by design on that So I'm just telling you that if you make this motion, that's how we would plan to approach it absent any other board direction

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:16 · ≈ 9:15 AM

Thank you for that clarification

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:18 · ≈ 9:15 AM

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:19 · ≈ 9:15 AM

the motion would be to approve contract as is, but direct you to terminate it January 31st which would necessitate the commission making a decision either in December or January of whom

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:40 · ≈ 9:15 AM

I'm not trying to fight you on the on the termination. I'm just trying to Have the option that if the Commission chooses to stay with this firm, which they may well do That we would not be terminating it. So I think if the motion is to approve this Subject to termination on if the date is January 3rd 31st absent The Independent Redistricting Commission indicating they want to continue the contract that then I wouldn't need to bring it back to the board

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:09 · ≈ 9:16 AM

Yeah, I just want to make it and the reason why I think we've gone back and forth. It's just that If they don't make a decision, I want to determinate They add to me They should have to make a decision one way or another not not not not that this that our decision stands if they can't if they don't make a decision Is that still possible under your suggestion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:38 · ≈ 9:16 AM

I think the motion, you know a way to accomplish that would be to move the recommendation with the contract terminating on January 31st 2021 absent the Independent Redistricting Commission indicating that they don't want it to terminate on January 31. That would be a positive decision by them if they make no decision it terminates

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:58 · ≈ 9:16 AM

OK, I'm OK with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:59 · ≈ 9:16 AM

that. And I'll say that as a housekeeping item, this is an unusual setting. The Independent Redistricting Commission is an unusual setting. I think it will be an awkward housekeeping item to have this body on January 31st picking attorneys but we will work with them to do it as smoothly as possible.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed17:22 · ≈ 9:17 AM

I want to remind everyone that we only have two meetings in January. I know the independent redistricting committee is meeting this week and they will be doing their work. I'm just looking at the dates of December and January of when Mr. Gazzone would be able to come back after hearing input from the redistricting committee about when a new contract could be put in place.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:54 · ≈ 9:17 AM

Commission's going to do is the first five members will be involved with appointing the next six. And then really until they receive the census data, they're doing preliminary work anyway so I don't think it's gonna be time sensitive in the first month or so of the new year and we looked at that ahead of time and I think getting through the appointment of the six is the time sensitive item and after that it's less time sensitive I think we can have productive meetings with them without making it exigent.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:28 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Well, I know it's awkward but redistricting and awkward go together hand-in-hand and at least it's not as awkward as the old process. All right, we have a motion in a second and I think clarity on the process. Are there any other comments or discussion? Madam Clerk would you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction18:46 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction18:48 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:52 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction18:52 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:53 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction18:53 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:54 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction18:55 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:56 · ≈ 9:18 AM

Thank you. Next item on the administrative agenda is Item A-16. Madam Clerk, would you please call this that item or read that item to the record?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction19:05 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, administrative item number 16 is from the County Executive Office. It is to receive and file the fiscal

year 2020 through 2021 first quarter budget and financial status report as of September 30th, 2020 showing the status of appropriations and financing for departmental budgets adopted by the Board of Supervisors.

0:19 – 0:2220 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:28 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Supervisor Lavinino I believe you wanted this item?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8219:31 · ≈ 9:19 AM

Thank you Mr. Chair, yeah I just wanted to get clarity and I've since spoken with Mr. Frapwell and I got that clarity but I did have one additional question and that is we're talking about the cannabis tax revenue That I think in our budget we estimated about $10.6 million in revenue this fiscal year, but it looks like now we've increased that to 14 million.

And my question is so those additional funds at an extra 3.3 or 3.4 million, that will be available to disperse at next budget cycle during next budget hearings?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed20:26 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Mr. Valparaiso? Supervisor Lavarino for the chair, so yes the absent boards action mid-year to appropriate those dollars that do sit in fund balance become available as a financing source for the next fiscal year's budget.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8220:41 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Okay all right thank you very much and I don't know if well okay I'm good thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:50 · ≈ 9:20 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Lavinino. You don't need a separate vote on this I assume and so we will go... No sir. We thank you. We'll then go to item A34. Madam Clerk could you please read that item into the record?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction21:03 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Yes Chair Hart and members of the board and before I move on to administrative item number 34 I just wanted to clarify for the record we did not receive any requests to speak from the public on the administrative agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:13 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Thank you for that clarity

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction21:15 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Administrative item number 34 is from the County Executive Office. This is to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance to adopt remedies including administrative fines for violations of county health officer orders pertaining to COVID-19.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:28 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Supervisor Adam, I believe you wanted to speak on this item?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction21:33 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Well, I just want a roll call vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:35 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Okay, very simple. Let's take a motion on this particular item. Would somebody like to make a motion please?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8621:42 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Move approval.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:43 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Is there a second? Second and motion is made by or seconded by Supervisor Williams. Any discussion? Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction21:56 · ≈ 9:21 AM

Miss Hartman I Mr Adam?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction21:59 · ≈ 9:21 AM

No,

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:00 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Mr Lavinino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8222:02 · ≈ 9:22 AM

No,

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:02 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Mister Williams

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:04 · ≈ 9:22 AM

I

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:04 · ≈ 9:22 AM

chair heart motion passes 3 to 2.

0:22 – 0:2819 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:08 · ≈ 9:22 AM

And since we have no other public comment or request to pull items from the agenda, can I please get a motion to approve the balance of the administrative

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8622:15 · ≈ 9:22 AM

agenda? So I move the balance of the administrative agenda and we would continue A24 till November 17th.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:23 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Thank you very much. Second. Supervisor Williams seconded the matter is there any discussion? Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:32 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adam?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction22:34 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:38 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:38 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:39 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:40 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:41 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:41 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:43 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on today's agenda. Madam Clerk, are there requests to speak on items that are not on today's agenda?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction22:51 · ≈ 9:22 AM

Chair Hart and Members of the Board we have two requests to speak on general public comment today. We're going to begin with Paul Bradford to be followed by Isabel Nava.

GuestDas WilliamsProposed · by introduction23:08 · ≈ 9:23 AM

Chair Harden, members of the board. I'm Paul Bradford representing Patterson Neighborhoods, a coalition of 356 neighbors who've expressed concern about the impacts of urban high-density projects. As you know, Sacramento's SB35 legislation has the laudable goal of increasing the supply of housing yet it's heavy handed and one size fits all approach strips local decision makers of traditional discretionary local control taking away your ability as a board to decide what's best for our community. It's loss of autonomy It's certainly felt at the Board and Planning Commission levels, yet its potential impacts of these high-density projects will be foisted on neighborhoods for near perpetuity. At the heart of SB 35's compliance is staffs' application of quote unquote objective standards when evaluating whether or not a proposed SB 35 project should be approved.

Clearly defining up front what specific guidelines constitute objective standards and whether or not to apply the standards contained in local community plans This is especially important because SG35 strips away the public's right to a traditional discretionary review process. On behalf of 356 neighbors in the North Patterson area, I have expressed concern about the impacts of these high-density projects and am asking that your board immediately direct staff to prepare a list of these objective standards and recommendations for incorporating potential standards set forth in local community plans.

And I thank you for your time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:40 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Thank you, Mr. Bradford and this seems like a really good idea to bring some transparency to the process and explain to the public how we will be implementing state law so I will follow up on your email. Thank you. Next is Ms. Nava.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction24:57 · ≈ 9:24 AM

Yes our next and final speaker is Isabel Nava

CommentIsabel Nava I'mProposedself-stated25:04 · ≈ 9:25 AM

Good morning my name is Isabel Nava I'm involved with a Family Act organization in Santa Barbara. I've been a member for seven years. I'm reaching out to you, the County Board of Supervisors. I've heard that you are the people that can help me make some changes in Santa Barbara County. I am the voice for Anthony Padilla. He is my grandson. Anthony was admitted at the ER in Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital five times and he was sent home with medication.

My grandson was suicidal, he had anxiety attacks. On October 14th of 2020 my grandson took his life. I lost my grandson. I will never be able to hold him in my arms and let them know how much I love them. I lost them because the county does not have funds to have psychiatric health facilities. How many people do you guys need that are going to be dead before you guys take action to the matter?

The community needs psychiatric bids for our loved ones. We don't want to lose our family. You the board that has the power, please help us and get some money in so we can get the help for our families. That's all I need to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed27:00 · ≈ 9:27 AM

Thank you very much, Ms. Nava for sharing your family story and we have great sympathy for your tragic loss. I think that concludes public comments. Supervisor Williams? Ms. Nava, we normally don't give responses but I thought it would be appropriate considering the level of your tragedy and loss to just point out that This has been years in coming, but are creating a number of beds in a continuum of care.

Which wouldn't exactly do what you're asking, but would accomplish the same thing. Because right now a lot of folks occupy psych beds that shouldn't be there because there just is no other place to put them and so we're expanding our bed system with other kinds of beds so that there would be the psych beds Would be essentially more often to be able to be used just for the folks who really qualify for them. So it's not exactly what you're asking for, but it would have the same result which is that people would have a better access to care that is appropriate for them.

Thank you for that additional information Supervisor Williams. It's very helpful

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

next item on our agenda Departmental item number one. Madam Clerk, could you please read that item into the record?

0:28 – 0:405 turns

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction28:37 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 update.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:52 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Dr. Doronoso and Ms. Mosnisch, welcome. Thank you both for being here today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed28:57 · ≈ 9:28 AM

Good morning. Briefing topics this morning, I'd like to brief your board on our local data as well as a our local data within context of what's happening throughout the state as well as the country and the world. I will give you the anticipated tier assignment from the Blueprint for a Safer Economy, and then I will transition it to Assistant CEO Terry Mosnisch for the new Community Data Dashboard.

This familiar graph describes our cumulative case counts in the county. As of date, we have 10,230 cumulative case count with 164 active cases and so for this period from October 26th through 11-9, the active cases demonstrates a 39% increase. We have 131 cumulative deaths. This graph describes our seven-day rolling sum of new cases by area, by episode date. I'd like to point out there's a lot of just movement throughout the different areas but I'd like to point out too the purple which is IV started During this period at pretty high of 78 and then ending in 25. So that demonstrates a 68% decrease.

The other is Santa Barbara, which is this orange line started out at 12. So the orange line is right here and then ending up in 34 so that denotes a 183% increase. Our hospitalization is at 12 So those are the numbers for Santa Barbara County. I'd like to show you a graph from Johns Hopkins University that describes our cumulative cases in California. So this graph shows daily confirmed new cases.

As of November 8th, we in California have 971,851 cases with 17,977 total deaths. So on the far right, this bar If it is red, it denotes that the trend in new cases is increasing. And if it is green, which it is not, denotes that it is decreasing. The number 9,561 on July 21st denotes that's when we had a peak in new cases in our state. This is the graph that describes COVID in the US.

The first case of COVID-19 in the US was reported exactly 290 days ago on January 21st. Since then, we have reported 9,860,558 cases with reporting 237,566 deaths due to COVID-19. And this graph describes a world perspective. This graph describes daily confirmed new cases, seven-day moving average. And this analysis uses a seven-day moving average so that we can visualize the number of new COVID-19 cases for the current 10 most affected countries and the green line This grant going up is the US.

So worldwide, the virus is spreading more rapidly than at any other point. The U.S. and Europe are both setting records for new confirmed cases while South America, North Africa, India and other regions are coping with serious outbreaks. So that sets the stage for what we are doing locally. This is the blueprint for a safer economy update as you recall, we are currently in the Red tier, which is considered the substantial with where adjusted case rate is from four to seven and positivity rate for county must be between five and eight percent. And the health equity metric must be between 5.3 and 8 percent.

And what we desired of course is to move into the less restrictive tier, the moderate tier. And we can do that when our adjusted case rate falls between one and 3.9 daily new cases per 100,000 and our overall county positivity rate falls to two between 2 and 4.9% and health equity metric fall between 2.2 and 5.2 percent. So based upon the numbers that we have, we anticipate that today at 12 that we will have an adjusted case rate of 4.3 and this is an adjustment from 4.6 Due to our exceeding the state median in the number of tests performed in our county.

Our positivity rate for I believe the first time falls to 1.8%. And that is within the yellow tier and our health equity metric is at 2.8% To give you a A reminder about where we've been for the last four weeks. We started at 4.3 and then moved up to a 4.4 inch up last week to 4.6, and now we are at 4 point 3. And this is our average adjusted case rate. With regards to testing positivity, we again are at 1.8% and that is a decrease from last week of 2.2%. And our health equity metric is at 2.8%, which is a decrease from last week of 3.2% And with that, I transition to Assistant CEO Terry Mocenich.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:59 · ≈ 9:36 AM

Thank you Dr. Doroniso. Are there any questions at this stage for Dr. Doroniso? Supervisor Williams? Well there's obviously something going on nationwide and internationally and we must be prepared but I also want to put it in Some context and maybe you could put it in the context locally because sometimes the number of new cases isn't a very good metric compared with looking in the summer or looking at the spring when we had much less testing resources right so.

We know a certain number of these are due to the fact we're just testing a lot more people So should we be more looking at the blueprint metrics for looking at how, what our really current state of affairs is or the hospitalizations and our hospitalizations are basically flat. Right? Is that but nationwide hospitalizations are up so we know that in other parts of the country even with new, even with more testing. Even when you compensate by going okay maybe we need to use another metric other than new cases a metric like hospitalizations that there are parts of the country that are in serious trouble and do we have any theories why that's happening elsewhere and not here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed38:39 · ≈ 9:38 AM

So, according to the state hospitalization is inching up statewide. And that is a concern and it follows it lags behind the increase in cases. I know that other jurisdictions have brought the concept of the availability of hospital beds as a nuance of the blueprint metric, just like the volume of testing is nuanced. So you get adjusted downwards that concept has been brought up to CDPH for consideration. What if you are a jurisdiction with Increasing cases, but yet your hospitalization is stagnant or stable.

Can we be can we get adjustment? That is something that's in discussion with regards to why are. Hospitalization is stable, whereas in other jurisdictions it is not. I want to say that perhaps it is due to a good proportion of our new cases is in the younger crowd and as well as we have somewhat of a stable landscape with regards to outbreaks in skilled nursing facilities as well as in our older population.

0:40 – 1:003 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:10 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Williams. Ms. Mosnes, thanks for being here and introducing the Community Dashboard.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed40:17 · ≈ 9:40 AM

Thank you, good morning Chair Hart and members of the board. Today along with our partners who will be joining us momentarily via Zoom we are very pleased to launch our new Community Data Dashboard. The dashboard is a result of a county-wide public private partnership with multiple county departments and community organizations and agencies involved. It's important to note that the development of the dashboard was funded through philanthropic efforts In service of to our community and we are very grateful and appreciative to the individuals for providing this tremendous resource that we will use collectively to provide additional information, build community capacity and continue to navigate through COVID-19.

The new dashboard does build upon our current dashboard that the board and many of our community are very familiar with. It builds upon our surveillance metrics, our status reports and other existing data currently provided at publichealthsbc.org It does and will continue to reflect the state metrics as just referred to by Dr. DiMarinoso, and it will continue to reflect our progress through the various tiers.

In addition there are new interactive data charts which will allow our viewers to further explore some of the critical data that we speak about very frequently including testing rates, case rates, healthcare capacity You will now be able to view this type of information over time, by place and with enhanced look at demography. The charts and graphs really do help tell the local story of COVID-19 and will help provide our residents with an opportunity to view the data so that they can make the best informed decisions about their personal health and welfare decisions.

With over 5.3 million views since its launch in March, our public health data portal at publichealthsbc.org is a primary method of communicating with our public regarding COVID-19. Our existing dashboard and status reports have received over 2 million views since their launch. We want to continue to engage our community along this platform and make sure that our visitors have critical access to the information presented. The dashboard, the new dashboard will be available on the existing Public Health SBC website at publichealthsbc.org, once again. We've reformatted the site so that the new dashboard is very easy to find and utilize. In addition, the dashboard will also be embedded among various partner sites as they may wish.

As I noted, this effort truly is the result of a very robust public-private partnership facilitated by Legacy Works and Carl Palmer who you will meet in just a moment. It is guided by a steering committee made up of public health experts and community leaders The steering committee's work, however, was also informed by a larger advisory group as shown here with broad expertise and perspective that really brought quite a bit to the overall design and formatting and how all the data should be presented. And we're very grateful and appreciative to them for their work.

This next slide, right before I turn it over to Carl Palmer reflects all of the contributing partners that have been involved in this effort. And I do want to thank all for their expertise and time to make our vision of a community dashboard a reality. With that, I'm going to go ahead and turn it over to Mr. Palmer. He's going to give us a little view of the dashboard itself and then Dr. Lynn Fitzgibbons and Mr. Steve DeLera of the Family Service Agency will also make a few comments. So I'll go ahead and turn it over.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed44:10 · ≈ 9:44 AM

Thank you, Terry. Thank you Chairman Hart and members of the Board of Supervisors for the invitation to share the dashboard here today. I'd just like to start by saying what a privilege it's been to work with everyone who's made this project possible. I'm here as just one representative of a very large group of people that Terry just described. I would like to thank them all for their remarkable commitment to this project.

I also just want to thank the county leadership and county employees, the teams that we've been working with My hat's really off to everyone. I've been impressed the whole way through with everybody's efficiency and effectiveness, and first and foremost among them the public health department and in particular the epi team who have been the bedrock for this Um, our goal has been to build a user friendly data dashboard that gives you all community members and decision makers alike the information needed to make decisions.

To reign in the coven 19 pandemic here in the county and to navigate recovery efforts. I'm going to introduce you now to the dashboard. And we're really quite proud of what we've built together, what we have thus far. And I just want to also underline the fact that this is an ongoing effort and we're looking forward to working with all of you to continue to improve the dashboard and what it is able to do for the community.

The dashboards organized by topic with these tabs across the top. Here, we're on the introductory page where you can switch between versions. Your browser should recognize if you're coming from a computer or a smaller device and automatically directs you to the right one. But if you'd like to switch, you can do so here. You can also toggle between English and Spanish versions.

Using these tabs and also up here in the upper right, you can always switch languages. There's a video that will introduce you to how the dashboard works some critical data here on the front page right now it's focused on our current status and what we need to do to shift downward in the reopening process and what we need to watch to make sure that we don't go the other direction. And there's a little bit of information here about the dashboard itself That we would love to hear.

Navigating through the dashboard here with you, the status tab really focuses in on our current status as. So it's just sharing this gets updated every Tuesday when we get new information from the state. You can see actually, each of the tabs has a has a date field up here to show when it was last updated and when it's updated on an ongoing basis. The state metrics themselves are updated each Tuesday.

Data on the dashboard and this particular tab is updated on a daily basis during the weeks, not holidays. Dashboards are made up of widgets we call them these little panels. They can have a single data point like this one that shows our current status or they can be stacked and if they're stacked you can navigate using these tabs along the bottom. To see additional data, for instance here the full trend of the case rate history.

If you hover over the data, you'll see what the data point is underneath and you'll also notice that on some of the tabs, you'll see these dots along the bottom. And if you hover over those, you'll see some key dates in the epidemic. Each widget also can be expanded using this toggle here in the corner. which just gives you a much broader view if you're on a small screen, that's quite helpful.

And you'll note too that there's a bar across the top that allows you to change the time sequence that you see. So you can zoom in if you just wanna see the most recent data for instance here on this chart. I'd also just like to point out that many of the datasets have an information tab where folks in the epi team at the public health department Partners like Dr. Lynn Fitzgibbons, our nonprofit partners have contributed to the interpretive information here so you can learn more about the data and what's being represented and why it's important.

You'll note that this bottom here in the bottom left, we have a whole stack about cases. Here you'll see there's a whole stack about positivity testing. I'm just going to show you 1 or 2 of these charts as we go through. I recommend you explore and learn about the dashboard on your own. But I just wanted to show you a couple of charts. This 1 in particular, I think will be important to pay attention to as we have. We're showing 2 things here new cases by episode date which is the standard the state requires us to report by.

The current environment includes a seven-day lag, so we're not showing cases by episode date for the most recent days. We can however show cases by reporting date. You'll notice that this reporting data is much more volatile. It goes up and down a lot. It varies a lot. That depends on a lot of factors depending on when the cases, the tests are actually reported to public health rather than when they actually occurred.

You'll see that volatility here, but it's interesting to see what's happening in the most recent days. It's a bit of an early indicator for where things are or where things may be trending. Navigating through, I only have about 10 minutes total so I'm not going to be able to hit on every data point here and every chart. But I do want to show you a few highlights from each tab.

We have a cases tab here that shows the critical new data across the top. These first four are new, the next two are cumulative. That same data is then shown here but look with a long-term trend. New cases, active cases, weekly deaths cumulative cases and case status. Note here that almost all the cases are recovered, so it's difficult to make much of the data that you're looking at but using the legend, you can turn on and off different data layers. So we can see here that there's quite a lot of active cases. We can turn that layer on and off if we'd like. And now we can just look at current hospitalizations and deaths. We can turn the desks off and just look at the hospitalizations data. So you're able to manipulate the data depending on what you want to see.

Same is true here with transmission method, if you do you want to seek community close contact is the largest obviously if you want to zoom in you can click on the others. Here on the geography tab as I'm navigating over to it you'll see that we're presenting data in the form of maps here with new cases shown each circle is scaled to the number of new cases for that area. I can click on a circle and it'll both it'll do two things the geographic boundary for an area. This is the unincorporated area of North County. It'll also pop up a data table here that shows the data for that area.

We're also have we have a map of total cases and then we present that data here in bar charts as well easy for easy comparison from one area to another, and also in the form of a table. That data is also presented down here in this chart In terms of seven-day rolling sum of new cases by area, this is the same data that Dr. Donovanoso showed in the earlier chart from the current previous dashboard. Here you can again manipulate the data if you want to move past that high peak in the summer and get a zoom in on what's happening now. You can turn off Santa Maria depending on which place you're interested in. You are able to zoom in and I'm here on the health care tab. We're presenting some of the data that Dr don't know so referred to earlier as well, the capacity that's available in our hospital system and our medical system these gauges show percent occupied.

So we're 56% occupied in terms of our total hospital beds right now. 61% in terms of our staff ICU beds and only 11% of our ventilators are in use. That same data is being presented down here, but not in percentages in total numbers. You can see that we have hospitalizations. We have ICU here and this kind of brick colored line is our COVID cases, COVID hospitalizations so the rest of that data is non-COVID hospitalizations I should also, I forgot to give the caveat at the beginning that I am not a public health expert. So Dr. Fitzgibbons is going to go next and correct anything that I'm saying erroneously.

And the FE team is here too as well to answer any questions that are more data specific. Here on the demographics tab, we're presenting a variety of data that wasn't readily available before in the dashboard that the FE team and public health team have been tracking and reporting on a quarterly basis. This data now will be updated monthly and be available all the time to the public.

We're presenting this in the form of stacked bar charts which allow us at a glance to see here for age groups that our community members who are 70 or older are bearing the brunt of the epidemic. They only represent 11% of the population They've done a great job of sheltering and staying safe. They're only 6% of the cases, but we see here that there are 22% of hospitalizations and 66% of deaths.

So at a glance, we can see really that we need to focus quite a bit on protecting this segment of the population. Similarly here with race and ethnicity, we can see at a glance that the Latinx community is similar impact from the pandemic, 48% of our population but 65% of cases and 74% of hospitalizations and 56% of deaths. Note that each of these charts is also backed up by individual bar charts for those component parts so you can see how they break out and you can flip through and again see with relative ease the impact each of those segments as our population is bearing Perhaps the most unique aspect of this dashboard that we built together and in this public private partnership is the community impact tab.

This one is packed full of information and is likely to expand to be more than one tab over time. These are arenas that we've been able to gather data on thus far, we're adding more data all the time I have quite a bit of data from community partners and from county agencies that's not in here yet that will be aggregating and adding over time but you can see we tried to focus it on the areas Here we're hosting information from UCSD economic forecast project on employment and unemployment.

So you can track that data here, we have a new panel that impacts. Thus far, what we're presenting is actually data that the Santa Barbara County Education Office team has shared with us on a weekly basis about schools and their status. Are they open? Are they mostly remote? But what are their opening plans? So this data is updated on a weekly basis so anybody in the community can click on nearby schools or the schools their children attend see this basic Here in the bottom left, we have food. This is food distributions by the Food Bank. You can see the top line here is 2020 on a monthly basis, 2019 in dark gray and 2018 in light gray. You can see at a glance that we've had a tremendous amount of food insecurity and increased need for food distributions in the community.

The same is true here when you look at this data from the Department of Social Services on CalFresh families served. Here on shelter we have a whole bunch of data on homelessness thus far, we're working on aggregating some data on overcrowding and housing adequacy as well that we hope to add but here you can see a suite of data that's been made available And then finally down here in health, we'll expand this out.

We're working with a number of agencies to increase the amount of information that we have here as well. But you can see that we have Medi-Cal FamilyServe. I just want to point out too that sometimes when there's too many tabs to list across the bottom, you'll have a little arrow on the bottom to navigate through. Here those same that same data on calls for help, calls for access by region in the county.

Number of clients receiving substance abuse services here interestingly 2020 is less there are fewer people getting substance abuse services not necessarily because fewer people need them but because the services are more difficult to provide. Same data there by area. Here we have number of deaths by suicide. Again, less this year. Here we have a number of opioid overdose reversals with Naloxone really important information here it's more than double the high point over the last two years.

Perhaps related to that increase in interventions there have been fewer alcohol and drug related deaths this year. And then some information about them So look for additional information here in the community impact arena over time. And then I'd like to just point out too that here, this is an important addition to the dashboard as well. The public health team on an ongoing basis has reported out on our influenza outbreak in the community during the influenza season. That data has been typically made available via email distribution list. Now with the dashboard we're able to make this data available to the whole community healthcare practitioners and community members alike. So you'll be able to track the influenza outbreak here in the community which obviously has important The rest of these sites, these tabs are hosted links.

These are basically embedded resources that are present in other places on other sites here the county COVID FAQ's. things are happening in the community, how the epidemic's unfolding. We'll be actually automating this to take a burden off of the public health team and the PIOs office as a next stage of evolution with the dashboard. And then we have some information here about the outbreak in California, a CDC site on the outbreak evolution here in the U.S., and then a site from Johns Hopkins on a global outbreak.

With that, I will end my tour and hand the mic over to Dr. Fitzgibbons.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:00 – 1:063 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:00:13 · ≈ 10:00 AM

Thank you very much Carl and a huge thanks to Terry and the whole team. I am going to open with just a tremendous gratitude. If we think of roses and thorns this has been a thorny year as an infectious disease physician in our community I think the reason we're here today to look at this dashboard may be an unparalleled rose for me thus far in this entire experience in our community. The product that you just had a wonderful whirlwind tour through is the result of just, I think the rich expertise networks and commitment that we have across our, of course county leadership And also across our nonprofit sectors and our generous philanthropic community members too.

As an infectious disease physician, I could not be more enthusiastic and excited about this tool that I am just thrilled to have going forward. In many ways the data that Dr. Doronoso just presented I think really tells us that the past several weeks have been very, I think reassuring in our community. Our data has looked stable in some ways though we anticipate having a view on what's happening globally as she pointed out of you and what's happening nationally and perhaps most pertinent of you and what's happening is close to Los Angeles County over these last few days tells us that there may be changes afoot. And I think that for an infectious disease physician, for a school principal, for a small business leader, for an elected official and for simply a community member who wants to stay educated And wants to stay up-to-date on the status of our condition, excuse me, the condition of our community.

This dashboard I think is just going to be incredibly empowering because I think I look at case rates all day every day. I just wanted to emphasize the excitement that I have for the community tab that Carl showed. I think that as we worked on developing the dashboard great conversations with Terry in particular, Terry and Carl regarding the real goal of the dashboard. And I think what we realized was that there are, I think two related but distinct goals.

We want to be able to tell you and the community at large about what has happened. We want to be able to tell this story of the impact that this epidemic has had on our community and on every corner of our community. But of course, the second critical aspect to this dashboard is functioning as perhaps a crystal ball. Helping us make the most data-driven predictions for what may be coming tomorrow, perhaps in a week or perhaps next month. And I think that what we hope is that the dashboard can really serve both because of course these two functions are very closely related And I think I'll just finish, I think with what I started with which was a tremendous gratitude to all involved. So many behind the scenes, I won't get bogged down naming everyone but particular shout out to Megan and the county epi team for I think their Herculean effort to really provide us with this incredible tool.

Thank you and I'll hand it back to you Carl

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:03:58 · ≈ 10:03 AM

Thank you, Lynn. Dr. Fitzgibbons has been a remarkable part of this. She's been a big part of the inspiration and I think if anybody is the heart and soul of it, it's you, Lynn. So thank you very much. Steve DeLera is joining us as well. He's a member of our steering committee as well, and he's been a big contributor. And Steve, I'd love to ask you to share your perspective as well

PresenterSteve DallaireFamily Service Agency of Santa Barbara CountyProposedself-stated1:04:18 · ≈ 10:04 AM

Thank you. Good morning, Chair Hart and members of the board. I'm Steve Dallaire, Deputy Executive Director of Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County. And while I was provided an opportunity to work on the dashboard as a member of a nonprofit, as you can imagine, I'm very active in our community with NAACP, LULAC on the Board of the Continuum of Care which is addressing our homelessness in our community and a member of the Knights of Columbus So I'm spread throughout the county trying to help as much as I can, giving back to my community. So I'd like to start by saying thank you to everyone that has given Family Service Agency the opportunity to be a part of the development and the implementation of a well-designed dashboard. A dashboard which I believe provides on demand access of important metrics our community can immediately see as we navigate from widespread to substantial, substantial to moderate And hopefully with the goal of someday going to minimal.

Some areas that I think that we sometimes don't really think about is that the county could be at substantial, but Santa Maria or the city of Santa Maria could be at widespread. And so when people ask why are the schools not open here in the Santa Maria area as an example? One response could be is it we're still at widespread and we haven't achieved the three weeks or the three metrics if you will being substantial.

The community, public sector and our nonprofits needed something that I believe would capture that we captured on this dashboard. We've captured something that allows the community to do analysis and provides a one page summary and an overview of what is happening in our community and in our county. Lastly, one of the goals was to provide a dashboard that was easy to read and one that offers transparency by providing better visibility of metrics. I think we accomplished that and as Carl mentioned this really was the collective effort of many many people coming together to provide input and put out there what we think the community wanted to see what we believe you wanted to see as you assist our community in getting well So on behalf of Family Service Agency and all the parties that work on the dashboard, thank you for your time.

And thank you for your service to our communities.

1:06 – 1:1317 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:06:43 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Steve, we'll turn it back to you, Terri.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:06:46 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Thank you. And that does conclude our presentation. We welcome any questions. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:50 · ≈ 10:06 AM

Thank you everyone. I want to start with thanking CEO Miyasato for green lighting this collaboration and Ms. Maz-Nisic for quarterbacking it and carrying it Nurturing it, shepherding it for a very long time. There are a lot of people involved. Mr. Palmer your assistance and leadership have been invaluable as has Dr. Fitzgibbons your contributions as well and Mr. DeLera and all of the people there are too many people to name and thank but this is really an incredible thing I know that the community will be really well served by having this tool. The better transparency and visibility of this data is extremely important as Dr. Fitzgibbon said to every person. A business owner who wants to know You know, what investments to make and what to hope for in the future.

School leaderships and parents and even their children who can look in this really easily and find out where we are and where we're going. And government leaders like my colleagues here on the board that can very quickly access this information. So this is an incredible tool and it's really a unique partnership with the community. I don't think there's anything like this that I've ever seen on any website in the country so we are leading the way and we really appreciate All the tremendous work and collaboration that went into this.

Are there other questions or comments from board members? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:08:07 · ≈ 10:08 AM

Yes, I just wanted to say this is an extraordinary partnership. And this is the kind of community we live in and we're so proud about in Santa Barbara is that these people come together and they have ideas and can bring it to government and that we're receptive to those ideas. And a lot goes to public health because you have a lot on your plate I just wanted to say that I have heard from the Chumash tribe, the schools, UCSB farm worker people about the kind of partnership that they have with our public health and how appreciative. And that takes so much work and yet you could also find the time to contribute to this effort and support it because it wouldn't go anywhere without that support.

I'm always surprised at how people are asking me always for more data, and I'm scratching my head. I'm not a data nerd really. And so this is now what they wanted and I couldn't even imagine what it was. And so having it here is amazing. And I think this is just the beginning. My real vision is to take this idea for county programs more broadly and show we agree on what the metrics are, and we have Road miles we know the condition of our roads, but we should know the condition of our programs across the board And so I think this is really pioneering and I imagine a lot of other people are going to be looking at this model So thank you so much to everybody who worked on it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:49 · ≈ 10:09 AM

Any other questions or comments The other thing I'd really like to highlight is the fact that this is in Spanish, that it is just as accessible to Spanish speakers as it is English speakers. And that was intentional and designed from the beginning. In fact everything we've been trying to do in regards to the response of the pandemic has really focused on being accessible to everyone and anyone speaking any language in our community so thank you for that.

Well if there aren't any other questions is there some public comment on this item? Madam Clerk could you please introduce the public comment?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:10:22 · ≈ 10:10 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we do have one request to speak on this item and we are going to Andy Caldwell.

GuestAndy CaldwellClerk Of The BoardProposedself-stated1:10:32 · ≈ 10:10 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board, I'm Andy Caldwell representing Colab. I sent each of you an email and I also sent the clerk of the board one of these charts that the county had put, I think it's on page eight The coronaviruses from John Hopkins University that showed the United States compared to other countries in Europe and India and Brazil. And I was actually dumbfounded to see that they did not bother, your staff did not bother to put Sweden on this chart.

Sweden as you know made world news because it did not pursue Containing coronavirus in the absence or in a vacuum of herd immunity. So I went to the exact same website, coronavirus.jhu.edu slash data slash news dash cases and I plugged in Sweden versus the United States and I'm on a time lag via this phone versus what I can see on my computer But you know I honestly have to say that I am kind of appalled that your staff left Sweden out of this.

One of the things that I don't hear you guys ever questioning is maybe we're doing it wrong. Maybe Gavin Newsom is doing it wrong. I think Supervisor Williams hinted at this that the number of cases means diddly squat if the people aren't sick And the number of cases is a function of how many people you test. The only metric that matters is hospitalizations and death because there's an, there is the chance and the opportunity for herd immunity. California has tested some 18 million people in 17 million were negative. And yet we're still in a status of shutdown.

This cannot go on forever. We're seeing more and more businesses go under And we just wish that your staff was honest enough to stuck Sweden in that metric and ask the question, why if the United States has one of the best health care systems in the world? Are our numbers going up and everybody else's is going down. It's a fundamental question and it's a fair question to be asked. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:13:08 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Thank you, Mr. Caldwell. Are there other requests to speak?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:13:14 · ≈ 10:13 AM

That was our only request to speak on this item. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:13:16 · ≈ 10:13 AM

great thank you very much any other comments from board members or questions? Can I get a motion to accept the report?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:13:25 · ≈ 10:13 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:13:26 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Motion's been made is there a second? Second. Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:13:34 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction1:13:39 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Thank

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:13:40 · ≈ 10:13 AM

you. Thank you.

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction1:13:42 · ≈ 10:13 AM

Thank

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:13:42 · ≈ 10:13 AM

you very much. Thank you. Thank thank you very much. Thank you very

1:13 – 1:316 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:13:48 · ≈ 10:13 AM

much. Thank You. Thank Thank you very much. Thanks. Thank

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:14:08 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Welcome. Good morning, it's good to be here. Very good to be here. It gives you some sense of normalcy when you come into the board meeting. To see me in person? Yes, yes. Glad you're here. Good morning Chair Hart and members of the board. I am pleased to announce or introduce Eva Camarena who is my personal assistant who also staffs the Women's Commission and has done a tremendous job staffing the Women's Commission so I'll let her introduce the women's commission item and work with you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:14:34 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Welcome Ms. Camarena thanks for being here and look forward to this

CommentEva CamarenaProposedself-stated1:14:43 · ≈ 10:14 AM

Hi, good morning Chair Hart and members of the Board. My name is Eva Camarena and I am the Executive Assistant for the Community Services Department. I have the great honor to provide staff support to the Commission for Women and today I would like to introduce their annual report video presented by Chair Fitzwilliams and Vice-Chair Peralta. Commissioners Tracy Beard and Susanne Peck will be available via Zoom after the video presentation to receive questions or comments from your board.

Thank you.

CommentMargaret Margs FitzwilliamProposedself-stated1:15:15 · ≈ 10:15 AM

Hello, Chair Hart and members of the Board of Supervisors. My name is Margaret Margs Fitzwilliam and I am the chair for the County Commission for Women for 2021. I'm here to present to you together with my co-chair Yvette Peralta the annual report to the Board of Supervisors And first of all, we'd like to just review the mission with you. Our mission statement is to promote the well-being and equal status of women across the gender spectrum in Santa Barbara County.

And we work collaboratively to develop, facilitate, recognize and recommend programs, collaborate with other agencies, gather and disseminate information, conduct public meetings and advise the Board of Supervisors. Now, I would like to present to you again our Vice Chair Yvette Peralta who will continue with the presentation.

CommentIsabel NavaProposed · by introduction1:16:26 · ≈ 10:16 AM

Thank you, Marks and hello Board of Supervisors. It's an honor to be here with you to tell you a little bit about all of our involvement and our impact in our county across the districts that we serve. And I would like to start by telling you that each year the Santa Barbara County Commission for Women presents summaries of our important and exciting work On behalf of the Board of Supervisors and Santa Barbara County's women and girls, you know, we take pride in serving our mission to promote the well being and equality of women and girls across the gender spectrum county wide.

Here are some of our highlights that's what you're going to see in the next few slides. Of projects and some key outcomes, and also a preview of our 2021 operational work plan. And I mean, all of the work that we do. takes place because we have very committed and passionate individuals that are part of our commission. As you can see, the picture in the middle is one of our virtual meetings. Actually it was a retreat meeting in August which lasted three hours so it was a long, long meeting where we planned and we reflected on all of the great things that we were able to accomplish in 2019-2020 Here's our chair, Marks. We also have Dr. Anna Everett, Susanne Peck, Allison Wells.

We have Karen Steinwaltz, Jesse, Judy Weisbord and Tracy, Dr. Gallagher. We have Eva, our admin staff and also Victoria Juarez joining us there. We operate via subcommittees. We have a committee that works in regards to everything that has to do with average, which means public face of the commission and our work we also have a subcommittee. That focuses on policy, which tracks the local state and national legislation affecting women. And they also attend conferences.

The leadership developments of committee encourages woman's participation in that community whether that is like in business and political leadership involving women and girls. And then we also have the listening sessions of committee, which this is something that we are all part of. We are the eyes and ears of the Board of Supervisors and constituents. We conduct public meetings to hear from them in the advocacy subcommittee it's about.

Discovering, supporting and promoting key causes directly beneficial to women and girls in our community. And the Veterans Stand Down group is the one that coordinates our involvement which has been annual for the past few years with Veterans Stand Down program in Santa Maria. Some of our collaborations with other agencies in October of 2019, where with veterans stand down events as I just mentioned organizers and Supervisor Steve Lavagnino who represents the 5th District started this event and this program. And our Commissioner Beard myself Everett also Commissioner Peck and Juarez Have been involved in this event in the past years, as you can see some pictures there of the last annual veteran stand down event. Once again for the second year in a row we were able to Film and produce a video with the help of Santa Barbara County TV station.

We interview a lot of women who are experiencing homelessness and who have served our country, and we also help them. link with community organizations that offer services for them. For the past eight years, I would like to highlight that the Veterans Stand Down has been supported by the Commission for Women to acknowledge and thank Santa Barbara County vets for their sacrifices in service to our country.

The commissioners this last year secured needed products and services from companies and organizations And also we donated daily use goods. We have conducted interviews to produce a short video. Which was sponsored by Supervisor Labanino, thank you so much for making that happen. And once again just to highlight the video shares the stories of veterans experiencing homelessness and it's we want to showcase it and share with the community that way you know we can become aware of this challenging situation that a lot of the vets do And as you can see on the picture right here, we have Sandy Blair who has worked tirelessly with Operation WEPS to provide housing and resources to women veterans. We continue to work with her to see how we can support her mission.

Other collaborations we've had have been with the Women's March Planning Committees in Santa Maria. As you can see, we have participated in the marches and in planning the speakers that will be there. I provided interpretation in the one in Santa Maria and also helped build their website. In Santa Barbara here are some pictures of Commissioner Everett and Gallup Moore and Weisbar attending the Women's March in Santa Barbara County.

I mean, in the city of Santa Barbara also accompanied by some youth and local leaders. Also, we have collaborated with other organizations such as the Legal Women Voters both in Santa Barbara and in Santa Maria. During Woman's History Month we honor women in leadership and also community organizations for their outstanding work And here on, on this pictures as you can see we were present at the screening of California woman win the vote which was.

A brief, a short film that talked about how women in California of different backgrounds advocated for the right to vote. And this happened at the Santa Maria Public Library so the commission we ordered these frames that we could take to every single event that we attended in 2019 and 2020. We of course plan to reuse them but they serve to promote what we believe in and the importance of getting out the vote We also hosted a woman in government forum in February of 2020.

Supervisor Lavanino was there to help us introduce this event. And our main goal with this was highlight and acknowledge the hard work of women who are elected officials and or who are serving that community and the constituents in their roles, and our goal was to, to highlight them to Learn from them and also to be inspired by the work that they are doing, whether you know they're serving in city councils and commissions boards or just.

Also we wanted to bring awareness about the election cycle and just the important of registering to go and voting our forum happened at Allen Hancock College and we had. A crowd that joined us, it was also videotaped and we have been disseminating those videos to the community. And here are the panelists that share their experiences as women in government. We also had our former Commissioner Liliana Cardenas be one of the panelists representing the city of Guadalupe and talking about women in government We want to thank and highlight the leadership and service of Hannah Beth Jackson, our former senator who retired recently.

And next on the screen we have the event one of the main events that we attended in March as part of our history month events. We sponsored the 2020 Leadership Summit With a team leading with love that attracted women across the Central Coast to participate in a date mom conference with the overarching theme of gratitude, which included moments of inspiration. Thought provoking conversations and they call it to action to change the way we interact with one another on this picture you can see Commissioner Beard myself Commissioner Wells and our new chair.

Mark Fitzwilliam posing right there. We had a great morning and meeting new people and really being inspired by the work that Leading with Love does. We also have worked with, let me see, let me change it to the next slide. We have worked with other organizations in the county Thank and to honor the lives of those who put their lives on the line for us and fought for voting rights for all, which is a fight that still continues today. Our Commissioner Judy Weisbart led this effort. She organized a Women's March of Silence in Santa Barbara on March 1st and we invited all genders to participate, people of all ages, political racial and ethnic groups were welcome of course. And we asked them to wear white in honor of those lives that Have passed and have fought really hard to, to advocate for voting rights.

And all of these organizations were able to join us and be part of this event. And here you see Commissioner Weisbart speaking to the crowd and some of the people that joined us that day. We also sponsor Women's History Month. I mean, sorry we also sponsor her festival which was part of the series of events that we supported During Women's History Month, and this event was very amazing. It was a special it was completely organized by high school girls and it's an event that celebrated the woman in our community and empower the next generation of female leaders.

It gave everyone in Santa Barbara regardless of age race gender. A day to come together and celebrate the strength of the amazing women and girls in both our community and our society. The Commission for Women sponsored the event, and also we tabled there which took place in Gersh Park in Goleta. And the lead commissioner on this project was Suzanne Peck And some of us also attended, as you can see here in the picture. And these three young people are the ones that co-chair the event, as you can see here.

And we were able to take a lot of selfies with the frames and post them on our social media and just again promote voting in our commission. COVID-19 hit, we of course started to think about the ways we could get involved to do our part and help our community. And Commissioner Judy Weisberg was one of the lead organizers to create and distribute masks throughout the county.

Dr. Anna Everett and Allison Wells have Had the opportunity to represent the commission for woman as keynote speakers in virtual events. You know, they were there they talked about different. topics that are important to women. And then I led the purchase and distribution of menstrual products to community organizations, over 10 of them actually, to be able to serve people in need of these essential items. We were able to purchase $1,200 worth of hygiene products and we're just so happy that we received a lot of support from the community And we also want to thank all of our frontline workers and highlight the work of one of our Commissioner, Dr. Charlotte Gallup-Moore for their service.

And of course, we couldn't miss an opportunity to celebrate and honor woman in leadership as we have done for many years with our annual service awards. But this year is our celebration look different. We went virtual and you all had the opportunity to participate in the video that we produced. As you can see here, the recipients that we nominated and that you also Helped us appoint our recipients that demonstrate their commitment and service to the Santa Barbara County every single day of the year. And we definitely take pride in shining the spotlight on them.

One organization or an individual was honored from each of the five districts, and here are some of the pictures You all had the opportunity to watch the video, and it's something that we are posting to our website and our social media as well for people to learn more about this amazing woman in leadership. And now I would like to pass it on to Marks to talk about the Commission for Women Representation across the county state and nation marks.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:31 – 1:443 turns

CommentMargaret Margs FitzwilliamProposedself-stated1:31:48 · ≈ 10:31 AM

Thank you Yvette. So yes, I wanted to mention that we have developed very strong collaborative partnerships with the ACCW which is the Association of California Commissions for Women and the NACW which is a National Association of Commissions for Women. And that all commissions throughout the state and the county of Santa Barbara within the county of Santa Barbara, we have collaborated at a very strong level with ideas and being able to come up with just being able to share what the national Association of Commissions for Women is doing, as opposed to the ACCW. But all in all we collaborate so that we actually aren't piggybacking on each other's ideas to move the commission forward in the interest not only at the county level but also at the state level and at the national level.

So I wanted to mention that those strong partnerships are very important for us to move forward within our county. And I also want to mention Our Commissioner Tracy Baird who's been on our commission, the longest commissioner on the Commission for about nine years. She has been the president of the ACCW for the last two years and was recently awarded as the 2020 Congressional Woman of the Year Award by our Congressman Salud Carvajal.

And we are just so proud of Tracy because she is goes nonstop. She has never missed a commission meeting, she has never missed an event and she is constantly working towards bettering the lives of women and girls in our community and not only at the county level but at state and national levels so we want to be highly commend her for her work and thank her for being the one who is moving us forward in direction of the state and national values of the commissions for men These events that took place here, we had an event here in Chicago in July of 2019 and that was at the NACW. And then another event we participated in was in Los Angeles in June 2019 and that was at the ACCW.

And then more recently, just about a year ago we participated at the San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women event in November 2019. Next slide and we have also worked on many community outreach events and have achieved lots in the last year We celebrated the 100th anniversary of women's suffrage during parades, marches and events both in the North and South County.

And we actually did I think it was on August 26 that we actually celebrated the event through a parade in San Maria as well as a lighting ceremony here in Santa Barbara so Our commissioners attended both events and it was a very successful event in recognizing the 100th anniversary centennial of women's suffrage. We also passed a resolution, we have to pass I say resolutions in each city of the County of Santa Barbara and that is within the eight cities and we are pleased Actually, we are pleased to let you know that we were successful in having all the mayors of the cities collaborate with us on this venture to adopt CEDAW in each city.

And so I want to thank all our commissioners who worked tirelessly with council members and the mayors of each city to make this happen And so we are very proud to say that we are now a county that is supporting CEDAW and have adopted CEDAW as a resolution. And we are looking forward to working with you in moving forward to an ordinance, an actual CEDAAW ordinance for the city of the County of Santa Barbara.

Next slide. And then I wanted to mention here, something very interesting happened with the 2019-20 Commission for Women. We mobilized the Get Out the Vote and we worked tirelessly again with the League of Women Voters of the North and South County. We actually partnered with them and co-sponsored an ad in The Independent to promote Get Out the Vote. We have worked on many initiatives, but most importantly I want to mention that we've worked on an initiative to actually support student poll workers working at the polls during the presidential elections and out of...I was able to get some data from what actually took place in terms of employment of these students We found out that 125 students applied for these student poll worker positions at the presidential election and that out of those 125, 85 students served as poll workers.

And we also know that during the March primaries, we had 8% of the students represented as poll workers During the presidential election, we had that double to 16%. So we're very happy to report that we actually were very happy to have so many students involved in assisting in the vote process for the presidential election. And so this year we also plan to organize virtual presentations and discussions about diversity, equity and inclusion topics via Zoom.

And to share resources with the community. So we would like to be able to educate our, you know, community about situations that are affecting them during COVID and how to move forward With, you know having the right tools to move forward during these difficult times but also to share information. So we're going to be using these what we will call it's piggybacking from the women award-winning Women Speak Out events and we will be moving into these conferences and seminars and just discuss open discussions with our community members in different areas that could help to move women and girls forward Next slide.

And I just wanted to say that we are very grateful to our partnerships. We've had several partnerships that have worked with us in the last year, but most importantly want to actually say a really big thank you to the League of Women Voters of North and South County, the AAUW, And the United Nations. So we feel that, you know, they have been our biggest collaborators and we really thank them for helping to move forward with all our causes in support of advancing the needs about women and girls within our communities.

And lastly I just wanted to reiterate CEDAW which creates the action plan for bias training and equity social Responsibility and solidarity. So we are big, we hope to be continuing to move again this forward CEDAW for an ordinance. And CEDAW is the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. So we are looking forward to work with our supervisors in moving this forward to an ordinance where we can continue to work towards equality equity and solidarity within our commission.

And I also wanted to mention that there was an event, and this is probably not included here but a very important event took place on October the 18th which was a unity gathering in the Santa Ynez Valley. It was an inclusion event and Supervisor Hartman spoke at this event and led this cause. And we want to thank her very much for doing this This was a cause where we as a commission actually printed 1,000 unity posters.

And we have already distributed 500 of these posters to the north and south counties. And we are placing them in businesses and nonprofit organizations in all our communities. And so what it is that we're just wanting to make sure that we are always working together As a unified group of people in our communities, and we are everyone is included. So that's what our motto and mission is about with these courses. And so we want to thank Supervisor Joan Hartman for being actually leading that course in San Ines Valley.

And then I would like to say that we have some future activities that we will be planning for the year ahead. And I just wanted to mention that yeah, we will be working towards also historicizing and archiving Commission for Women's Relationship to Veterans Stand Down. We will be developing the March 2021 district award nominees and ceremonial process. We will be converting our Commission for Women Facebook page from private to public, and we will be maintaining a regular presence on social media.

We also will be collaborating with the County of Santa Barbara partners for the effective distribution of Pass The Mic, which is a very important video that we have done, and we will discuss that later. And then we also will be nominating groups and individuals to address the commission on various topics of interest. And we will be seeking collaborative partnerships and opportunities for co-sponsorship.

And last but not least, we just would like to mention that we are also in need of filling three commission positions with the fourth district and one with the third district. So with that said, I would like to thank our commissioners for the great work that they've been doing. Thank our admin staff Eva and all the admin staff who supported all the work that we're doing as well as to let you know that we have live at the meeting today. We would have Commissioners Baird and Commissioner Peck Here to answer any questions that you may have regarding our past projects and future initiatives.

And thank you all again, we want to thank again Chair Hart and all the supervisors of our County of Santa Barbara district community for all your hard work and for supporting everything that we are doing within our county for the Commission for Women. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:34 · ≈ 10:44 AM

Thank you very much, Chair Bitzwilliam. You represent the second district in the County of Santa Barbara

CommentIsabel NavaProposed · by introduction1:44:39 · ≈ 10:44 AM

very well. Thank you Marks and thank you Board of Supervisors for your time and we hope that you can help us appoint and find people, women to serve in the fourth district and the third district to have a broader reach and be able to support the districts that you represent.

1:45 – 2:1317 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:01 · ≈ 10:45 AM

Thank you, Chair Fitzwilliam and Vice-Chair Peralta. You did a wonderful job with the presentation that's so appropriate that in the year that is the centennial anniversary of women's suffrage that the Women's Commission hasn't missed a beat despite all of the unique challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic presents. to serve our community with distinction and take on projects and successfully complete them. And it's really impressive the work that you're doing and plan to do for next year as well.

Supervisor Williams? Well, I wanted to thank Ms. Fitzwilliams and Ms. Peralta for their presentation. And I want to just add someone who has supported CDOT's passage at a state level I say that I'm very open to having that discussion. It's a discussion that should have concluded in my mind decades ago, but ones that we can continue to fight for the rights of women of our community and the world by discussing this further.

Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:46:17 · ≈ 10:46 AM

Well I just also wanted to add my thanks to the Women's Commission and let you know that the third district appointee is in process. And one of our jobs as a Board of Supervisors is to engage the community in learning more about how the county functions, and the Women's Commission has really helped us with that. And you've done it, you know across the entire county and across different cities.

To see all the cities on the CDOT resolutions and proclamations is an extraordinary amount of work and all the effort and all the energy that you invest into this and the professionalism it's really gratifying to see and I thank you so much I also am grateful to Eva Camarena because that's a lot of work to keep up with that crew. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:47:14 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Thank You miss Camarena are there other comments from other board members

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.821:47:18 · ≈ 10:47 AM

Sure, Mr. Chair. First off I think special congratulations to Tracy for her recognition from Congressman Carbajal's office, well deserved. She's been on that commission forever and continues to do a great job. And obviously I've discovered a diamond in the rough with the vault, Yvette Peralta. Here she has given a forum on women in leadership when It's obvious that for anybody that can see, this is somebody that I think got a really strong, if she wants it, a future in leadership. So great to see her and also Allison Wales is doing a great job. That forum that we did Women In Leadership and I started thinking about, I was looking at the elections in Santa Barbara County the other day. And I was starting to look at the position of mayors in our county outside of the city of Guadalupe and I believe solving Every city has a female mayor now.

So, now the pressure's on. And lastly I just want to give a shout out to the commission for all their help on stand down and like I said unfortunately we can't do it this year but they have been Uh, staunch supporters always showing up early staying late and really not just being there for the photo ops but actually doing great work in supporting our veterans. So thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:56 · ≈ 10:48 AM

Thank you Supervisor Lavinino. All right well let's is there a motion? Oh excuse me I know that Commissioner Peck had something else she wanted to add.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:49:09 · ≈ 10:49 AM

Thank you so much. Good morning, Chair Hart and members of the board and CEO Miyasato. I wanted to say a little bit more about CEDAW and I appreciate Supervisor Williams your comments about CEDAW and it's time to get an ordinance passed. Just just a little background is was 1979 that CDAW was originally passed by the United Nations Goal to affirm basic human rights for all people and to prevent discrimination against women and men, to prevent discrimination against anyone.

So far 163 countries have signed on to CEDAW. United States is the only industrialized nation that has not signed or affirmed CEDAW However, cities, states, counties all over the US have been passing CEDAW resolutions and CEDAW ordinances. Santa Barbara County passed our CDAW resolution two years ago. Since then as Mark's mentioned we've gone up and down the county and every single city has passed a CEDAAW resolution so now it's high time for an ordinance especially in the year of the centenary of the passage of the 19th amendment The CEDAW objectives, as you know are to promote the development advancement and equity in all spheres including employment education health care political and economic realms not just for women but to prevent discrimination.

We did a study in 2014 of gender representation in Santa Barbara County And no surprise, we found that women were underrepresented in a lot of areas. And at the time Commissioner is now Congressman Salute Carpajal said you need to do this on a regular basis but look at race and ethnicity as well. And CDOT gives us a framework to be able to do that, to look at equity for everyone including LGBTQ, including race and ethnicity countywide. So Tracy has delivered a folder to you with samples of CEDAW resolutions and CEDAAW ordinances. I believe we're one of the few counties in the state of California that has not passed CEDAW as an ordinance. So again, it's high time in this centenary year our commission is eager to help in any way to see that we get an ordinance for CDAW.

Working with CEO, working with HR. Anything at all that we can do to work on equity and equality and inclusion for everyone in our county. That's a high priority for us this year. And I think Tracy has some comments also in terms of some of the ways we can put teeth in CEDAW based on all that she's learned in her important role as president of the California Association of Commissions for Women. So thank you very much for your support and encouragement. And Tracy, please add some thoughts now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:52:25 · ≈ 10:52 AM

As the Commission for Women we want to support the passage of CEDAW as an ordinance into this community. It is time we move forward for all of our men and women and CEDAW does include all men also in the passage. The people of this community, A very good equality for everyone as an ordinance this year. This is a great training opportunity for each of our cities counties within the leadership of all of us to sit down with our HR department, our CEO's office and to bring the leadership into an action plan.

Each supervisor over the next year we are going to meet with you and this is our goal for 2021 is within the CEO's office to help make And a totally action plan for everyone in our community. And I just say thank you to you and I also do want you to remember tomorrow's Veterans Day, we have veteran four drive-bys in our community and a little special of Sandy Blair who has done nothing but help support women. She was in good housekeeping on yesterday's call in the magazine she was also in Cosmopolitan Magazine and the Oprah Magazine and Women's Health. So if that doesn't say that this community is doing something, let me tell you the women in this community are working forward on a national level and on a state level to make sure that we take care of all men and women and our veterans in this community.

So thank you for having me on today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:56 · ≈ 10:53 AM

Thank you Commissioner Beard and Commissioner Peck for those final comments. We appreciate your advocacy and look forward to working with you in 2021. Is there a motion from the board to accept the report?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.861:54:10 · ≈ 10:54 AM

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:54:11 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Second motion's been made and seconded any discussion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:54:18 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adam?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction1:54:19 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:54:21 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Mr. Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.821:54:22 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction1:54:24 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Mr. Williams? Aye Chair Hart? Aye Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:54:28 · ≈ 10:54 AM

Let's take a 10-minute break and be back a little bit after 11 I'll reconvene the Board of Supervisors meeting for November 10th, 2020.

The next item on our agenda is the departmental item number three. Madam Clerk, would you please read the items to the record? And just for agenda management we're gonna go through agenda item number three and then we will also go onto departmental item number four before we break for closed session. Madam Clerk.

2:14 – 2:195 turns

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:14:00 · ≈ 11:14 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number three is from planning and development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the county and Montecito Planning Commission's recommendation to approve case numbers 20 ORD 8, 20 ORD 9, and 20 ORD 10 which would amend respectively the Montecito Land Use and Development Code MLUDC, the Article 2 Coastal Zoning Ordinance, and the County Land Use and Development Code LUDC.

To extend the expiration date for the Temporary Development Standards Suspension Ordinance to the earlier of when the Board of Supervisors declares the proclaimed Santa Barbara County local emergency from the COVID-19 virus is terminated. Or when the COVID 19 provisions, MLU DC sections 35474030D7 35474040A1, 35474040F, 35491020B4. and 35498090C. Article 2 sections 351612A, 35179BD9, 35179E, and 351859. And LUDC sections 3584040A1, 3584030D8, 3584040F, 35101020B4, And 35108090C are terminated by ordinance amendment.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:33 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Ms. Plowman, Ms. Harris thank you for being here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:15:37 · ≈ 11:15 AM

Mister chair members of the board good morning. Our apologies to miss Alexander about the mouthful there will be a quiz on that later. We're here today to extend our covid urgency ordinance amendments that we made several months ago, we had anticipated falsely that we might be out of the woods with regard to the pandemic And it was set to expire on the 16th of December. So we're here today to extend those and I'll turn it over to Miss Harris for the presentation.

CommentTess HarrisProposedself-stated2:16:15 · ≈ 11:16 AM

Good morning Chair Hart, Supervisors my name is Tess Harris and I'll present the COVID-19 ordinance amendments regarding extending a time period. So on June 16th of this year, your board heard the COVID-19 ordinance amendments and approved the amendments in the land use and development code, Montecito Land Use and Development Code. And Article 2 to assist in protecting public health due to COVID- 19.

The amendments included an expiration date of December 16th of this year or when the proclaimed Santa Barbara County local emergency from COVID-19 is terminated whichever is earlier. Since December 16th is approaching and COVID-19 is still an issue, the proposal before you today is for ordinance amendments in the Land Use and Development Code, Montecito Land Use and Development Code, and Article 2 to extend the expiration date to the earlier of when the Board of Supervisors declares the proclaimed Santa Barbara County local emergency from COVID-19 is terminated or when the COVID- 19 provisions are terminated by ordinance amendment.

The Montecito Planning Commission reviewed these changes on October 21st and recommended that the board adopt the Montecito Land Use and Development Code Ordinance Amendments, and that the County Planning Commission recommend to your board that you adopt the Article 2 Ordinance Amendments. Then the County Planning Commission heard these amendments on October 28th and also recommended that your board adopt the Article II and Land Use and Development Code Ordinance Amendments.

These amendments are exempt from CEQA and the CEQA guidelines sections for exemptions are on the slide. The proposed ordinance amendments do not alter the purpose or intent of any policies or development standards of the comprehensive plan, including the community plans and the coastal land use plan. And the amendments are consistent with the Land Use and Development Code, Montecito Land Use and Development Code, and Article 2 as they only extend the expiration date of the COVID-19 Ordinance Amendments that are in effect today.

Therefore, staff recommends that your board take the following actions for the Montecito Land Use and Development Code. Make the findings for approval of the MLUDC Ordinance Amendment including CEQA findings. Determine the adoption of the MLUDC Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA and adopt the ordinance case number 20 ORD 8 amending the Santa Barbara County Montecito Land Use and Development Code.

For Article 2, your board's actions should include the following. Make the findings for approval of the Article 2 Ordinance Amendments including the CEQA findings. Determine that Article 2 Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA and adopt the ordinance amending Article 2 case number 20 ORD 9. And last, your board's action for the Land Use and Development Code should include making the findings for improval of the Land Use and Development Code Ordinance Amendment including CEQA findings. Determine that LUDC Ordinance Amendment is exempt from CEQA. And adopt the ordinance amending the LUDC which is case number 20 ORD 10. That concludes staff presentation. I'm here if you have any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:46 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Thank you Ms. Harris. Are there questions for staff? Is there any public comments on this item?

2:19 – 2:2830 turns

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:19:55 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Chair Hart and members of the Board, we have no request to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:59 · ≈ 11:19 AM

Is there a motion to approve the staff recommendations? Move recommended actions.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:04 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:05 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Thank you. Motion's been made and seconded. Is there any discussion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:12 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:14 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:16 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Mr Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:20:17 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:18 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Mr Williams? Aye Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:20 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:21 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:24 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Thank you very much for the work presentation.

The next item is departmental item number 4. Madam Clerk, would you please read that item into the record?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:20:33 · ≈ 11:20 AM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number four is from planning and development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the appeal by Mr. Alger of the County Planning Commission's June 10th 2020 approval of the Frampton lot line adjustment and recorded map modification Case numbers 19 LLA3 and 19 RRM1, and this is in the first district.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:02 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Ms. Plowman?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:21:03 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Mr. Chair, members of the board, as Ms. Alexander indicated this is an appeal of a lot line adjustment and recorded map modification. The property is in the Toro Canyon area and we have Travis Lee from Planning & Development here and I believe we have Alex Tuttle his supervising planner available via Zoom. With that I'll turn it over to Mr. Lee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:27 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Mr. Lee, Mr. Tuttle thank you for being here

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:21:31 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Mr. Chair, would this be a good time for us to disclose ex parte?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:37 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Yes thank you that's great. This is a great time so Supervisor Lavanino do you want to begin?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:21:43 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Yeah I had a quick meeting earlier this week with the appellants attorney Ms. Petrovich.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:52 · ≈ 11:21 AM

Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.862:21:54 · ≈ 11:21 AM

And I had a phone conversation with Susan Petrovich and also Mark Lloyd, each representing the different side.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:06 · ≈ 11:22 AM

Supervisor Williams? Last week I had both a Zoom meeting with Susan Petrovich representing the appellant and walked around the site with Mr. Frampton and Mr. Lloyd The applicant and a couple years ago interacted with both of them about the question of whether previous violations have taken place. Supervisor Adam, do you have any ex parte communications?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction2:22:43 · ≈ 11:22 AM

None to report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:44 · ≈ 11:22 AM

Okay, thank you. And then last Friday I had a Zoom meeting with Susan Petrovich to talk about the appellant's concerns in the neighborhood and then yesterday I did a site visit with Mark Lloyd and Kevin Frampton to see the property and hear their responses to Ms. Petrovich's issues. Alright with that we'll go back to Mr. Lee for the presentation. Thank you.

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated2:23:11 · ≈ 11:23 AM

Good morning Chair Hart and Supervisors. My name is Travis Lee, and I will be presenting the Alger Appeal of the Frampton Lot Line Adjustment and Recorded Map Modification. The project is located at 785 and 805 Toro Canyon Road in the Toro Canyon Inland Area. The subject parcels are located north of Highway 101 and Route 192. Here is a view of the project site where the subject parcels are located near the intersection of Toro Canyon Road and Vista Linda Lane, west of Toro Canyon Creek.

Parcel 1 is the southern smaller parcel and parcel 2 is the larger parcel above. The parcels were created via tentative parcel map 14-534 in 2001, which subdivided one 12.72 acre parcel into two parcels of two acres, Parcel 1 and 10.72 acres, Parcel 2 with building and development envelopes on each. Here's the existing configuration of the lots. Notice the bolded shared lot line The proposed lot line adjustment and record map modification would adjust the property lines and modify the building development envelopes between two lots for future residential development.

No structural development is currently proposed, the size of the lots would not change but the lot lines in building and development envelopes would be modified. The building envelopes identify the location of future structures, construction storage and staging while allowing other uses such as grading, utilities, paving et cetera to occur outside the building envelopes.

The development envelopes identify the location of site preparation, ground services and construction activities including those for structures access easements subsurface grading sewage disposal and drainage components No ground disturbance, including grading, vegetation removal unless required by Carpinteria Summerland Fire Department or approved as part of the fire fuel management and habitat improvement plan.

Ornamental non-native landscaping or development is allowed outside of these envelopes except paving and utilities required for driveway access to serve those envelopes. Here's the proposed configuration with no change in size to the lots Here are the proposed building and development envelopes, which are spaced much further apart than their previous configuration.

And here are the original envelopes superimposed over the new proposed envelopes. Excuse me. I will now walk through each of the appellant's issues raised as part of this appeal. The appellant contends that the Planning Commission did not adequately prohibit the applicant from causing further damage to habitat that the original tentative parcel map conditions attempted to protect.

As stated previously, no development is proposed as part of the project and no development is allowed outside envelopes except paving and utilities required for driveway access to serve the envelopes. The product is conditioned to protect environmentally sensitive habitat throughout the property. The appellant contends that the Planning Commission did not require removal of non-native invasive plants the applicant planted.

The appellant requests that non-native invasive plants be replaced with native vegetation and the upper Mesa habitat area be restored. The prior impacts associated with planting of non native vegetation are unrelated to the proposed project of a lot line adjustment and record map modification. The plants in question are located outside existing or proposed envelopes As stated in the project description, new non-native ornamental landscaping is not permitted outside of the development envelopes.

The appellant contends that the Planning Commission did not require removal of the Road 2 and across the steeply sloped Upper Mesa area on the property which displaced native vegetation with non-native invasive plants. As stated previously, no development is proposed outside of the envelopes as part of this Removal of the existing road is beyond the scope of this project and the existing driveway was improved in 2017 with an erosion control permit, and it's considered to be part of the baseline condition.

As discussed in the finding session of the staff report, the proposed lot line adjustment and recorded map modification complies with all the applicable requirements and the findings can be made. Therefore, staff recommends your board to deny the appeal. Make the required findings for approval. Adopt a mitigated negative declaration and grant de novo approval of the project.

That concludes staff's presentation. Staff is available for any questions. Thank you Mr. Lee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:28:32 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Well next are there any questions of staff? Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.862:28:38 · ≈ 11:28 AM

I'll let Supervisor Williams go first, it's his district. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:28:41 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Supervisor Williams. No, I'm going to wait until the comments by both.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.862:28:46 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Okay have there been any NOVs issued for this property?

2:28 – 2:4022 turns

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated2:28:57 · ≈ 11:28 AM

Supervisor Hartman through the chair, as far as I know there have not been notice violations issued. There was a zoning violation but it was found to be no violation after investigation.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.862:29:08 · ≈ 11:29 AM

So there was a complaint but investigation showed there was not a violation and when was the Toro community plan passed?

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated2:29:22 · ≈ 11:29 AM

Supervisor Hartman through the chair. It was passed in 2002 if I remember correctly after the tenant parcel map was approved by the County Planning Commission 2001

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.862:29:30 · ≈ 11:29 AM

Okay, and my third and final question is The parties are allowed an opportunity to mediate and County Council will help with that between the Planning Commission decision and coming to the board. Did the parties avail themselves of that? To me, that's very important that they work hard, especially neighbors, to get along before bringing this to the board. So I just wanted to know that.

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated2:29:55 · ≈ 11:29 AM

Supervisor Hartman through the chair. Yes, County Council reached out to both parties to come to an agreement but there was... They did not come to agreement prior due to the facilitation meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:09 · ≈ 11:30 AM

Thank you, Supervisor Hartman's will next go to the presentation from the. Appellant miss Petrovich

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:30:17 · ≈ 11:30 AM

thank you Mister chair can you hear me okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:19 · ≈ 11:30 AM

Yes we can't thank you Mister chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:30:21 · ≈ 11:30 AM

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:22 · ≈ 11:30 AM

excuse me Miss Petrovich just 1 moment. We'll pause your time Mister Ghazani

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:30:26 · ≈ 11:30 AM

just to follow up on the facilitation facilitation was offered to the parties but they could not agree on the on the forum by which I mean in person versus a zoom meeting so there was not an actual exchange through County Council and that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:40 · ≈ 11:30 AM

Thank you for that clarification. Mr design sorry for that pause Ms Petrovich the, the podium is yours.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:30:48 · ≈ 11:30 AM

Mr chair could I have my PowerPoint put up please? Yes, I believe it is up now. Yeah good. Could we go to slide number 2 please? It seems like a small project, but other applicants will be watching to see if these recorded lot split conditions will be enforced. And if not then what's to prevent the conditions now being proposed for this project since the applicant is not proposing any houses immediately? Could we go to three please?

These are two of the many recorded lot split conditions. Number one, it states no grading or site disturbance associated with any development not with particular residential development and number 24 says before using or commencing work pertaining to any improvement you need a land use permit to ensure lots split conditions are implemented both of these conditions were violated by the applicant could we go to number four please?

The county LUDC defines development as any change made to property, including landscaping and improvement includes things growing in the ground. There is no mention in these definitions of either being associated with a permit or with a residential development in order to be imposed. Could we go to the next slide please? Number five. There are people who do not pay attention to conditions or they try to evade them. Step one is to buy a property that's subject to habitat protection at a reduced cost, of course because the extensive conditions do affect the value of the property Step one, you clear out the obstacles like protected trees and other vegetation. Step three, you grade or widen an old ag road in order to get rid of any native habitat that may be in the way of you widening the road as a condition for an ultimate project.

And then step four is wait And then submit your application and we believe that's exactly what these applicants did. Could we go to number six, please? We had a biologist do two different studies of the cleared area. And as you can see, the 2017 plants were invasive species were mowed down and then when they attempted to regenerate during the winter, they were mowed down again in 2018.

I would ask you to look at The letter that we have from Tamara Klug, it's a one page letter that addresses the mastication. It is not a way to protect native habitat. It's a way to destroy it. In any event this was not mosaic fuel management. This was just clearing of vegetation, native vegetation. Could we go to the next slide please? And incidentally, mastication of this would be a violation of conditions.

This slide it shows the yellow which is the original dirt road with and then the cross hatching shows what these applicants did to clearing and widening the road. Could we go to the next slide number nine please? I'm sorry, number eight. This is the red blob there and sort of in the top part of the property shows the amount of area that was denuded. Could we go to number nine please?

Top photo 2017 you see those dots that the applicant says are natives. Those really are pepper trees planted by the applicants. Could we go to the next slide please? We have a quick response to the applicants' excuses. Oops, what happened?

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:09 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Hello? Everything's fine you're here we can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:35:11 · ≈ 11:35 AM

hear you fine. Oh sorry!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:12 · ≈ 11:35 AM

That's right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:35:14 · ≈ 11:35 AM

Somehow I lost the picture. Could I have a second to try this technology thing? Did I have a second to... Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:23 · ≈ 11:35 AM

your time is paused so go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:35:25 · ≈ 11:35 AM

right ahead. I don't know what has happened here. I'm still showing on the webinar, but I'm okay. I''m back. Sorry about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:34 · ≈ 11:35 AM

No

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:35:34 · ≈ 11:35 AM

problem so The We do have a quick response to the applicants excuses for all of this damage. First of all, the trash removal that was down closer to Toro Canyon Road not up on the Mesa there was no reason to denude the MESA second eucalyptus removal their trees they don't require bulldozers and backhoes to take them out. Next, chaparral and coastal sage scrub are drought tolerant. They conserve their water in their stems and roots during the dry spells not in their leaves so they may look like they are dying back but all they need is rain to bring them back and that's exactly what happened here. The applicants saw them being coming back in 2018. They were attempting to regenerate after the winter So it was a very effective way of getting rid of them, but it was not by any means normal fuel management.

And then finally the insinuation that the fire department is somehow responsible for checking on project conditions and somehow deciding whether they're being met is just passing the buck. The fire department didn't know but Next slide please. Finally, there is just no excuse and I don't believe the applicants are being completely open about what their incentive was or their objective. If you look closely when you see their PowerPoint, look at slides six and seven that is the plan that was the basis for County approved plan clearly says no widening. This is to be for repair and maintenance of an existing dirt road only.

There was no approval of graveling or paving shown anywhere on that plan, that was just to be the same road just cleaned up a bit not widened and no native vegetation to be removed. The five acre brush removal ordinance doesn't override these conditions And there is a condition. There's a condition prohibiting new non-natives from being planted outside the building envelopes, but this damage is already done. They've already planted non-natives invasives in fact to replace the natives that they destroyed. So could we skip slide 12 and go to 13, 14 and 15 just quickly?

Here's one of the bulldozers next please Here they are again, and you can see how much clearing has gone on. And then of course the last one please. This is a backhoe up on the Mesa, a backhoe. It is not normal fuel control. Next one please, next slide. This is the paved and widened road to the Mesa. Next slide please. We do request that there be added conditions to what the Planning Commission approved just to ensure that this Mesa area is cleared of invasives and replanted with natives, and monitored by a biologist to ensure that there's a successful revegetation. We believe the road should not be further paved, it should be left alone used only for fire access and that the conditions apply immediately to prevent because they're not planning to build right away.

To prevent them from going out and doing more damage on the basis that these conditions aren't yet applicable. And then finally we'd ask that you modify This one biological protection that is among the counties, the Planning Commission's approval to make it apply to the entire property because as worded now it only applies to the property down near the building envelopes. And finally number 18 please.

We just, we just want to conclude by saying that the staff did make an error. This was development and it needed to have a permit or it needed to not happen. And therefore the native vegetation should be required to be replaced. And the road should be limited to fire access only. Mr. Alger did everything he could in contacting the county staff to try to stop this from happening or to get them to declare a violation, and I think it was just a misunderstanding of what the word development means.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:40:36 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Thank You Miss Petrovich. We'll now go to the applicants representative Mr. Lloyd

2:40 – 2:4514 turns

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:40:53 · ≈ 11:40 AM

Good afternoon, Mr. Chair and Board Members. My name is Mark Boyer. I'm the representative for the applicant. I have a brief mind power presentation.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:41:05 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Thank you. Chair Hart and members of the board, I'm sorry Mark we're having trouble understanding you. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:41:12 · ≈ 11:41 AM

think there's a microphone issue.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:41:14 · ≈ 11:41 AM

There might be a microphone issue on your end? No, you

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:41:26 · ≈ 11:41 AM

hear me.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:41:28 · ≈ 11:41 AM

It's very it's very scattered.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:41:33 · ≈ 11:41 AM

Perhaps I'll phone in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:41:36 · ≈ 11:41 AM

yeah thank you that will take a little break and then you can call in and then we'll have the audio. Going so good there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:43:36 · ≈ 11:43 AM

All right, thank you.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:44:11 · ≈ 11:44 AM

Yes, I am

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:44:23 · ≈ 11:44 AM

muted.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:45:13 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Already Mark, go ahead.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:45:15 · ≈ 11:45 AM

Can you hear me?

GuestDas WilliamsProposed · by introduction2:45:40 · ≈ 11:45 AM

What number is that?

2:50 – 2:5811 turns

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:50:21 · ≈ 11:50 AM

Can you hear me now? Hello, can you hear me? I can hear you Mark. Hi, can the board hear me?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction2:50:43 · ≈ 11:50 AM

We can hear you in Santa Maria.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:50:59 · ≈ 11:50 AM

Can you hear me in Santa Barbara?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction2:51:08 · ≈ 11:51 AM

Soviet surplus equipment. Sorry.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated2:51:22 · ≈ 11:51 AM

Hello, can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:51:33 · ≈ 11:51 AM

Mark, I can hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:52:14 · ≈ 11:52 AM

We're back and I appreciate everyone's patience while we work through the technical issues, and I believe that we are connected now. So Mr. Lloyd you have your time although I see the clerk's finger which indicates we might not quite be ready but we're getting closer

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:52:32 · ≈ 11:52 AM

Chair Hart, members of the board. Yeah, I just wanted to test with Mark for a moment and also remind all applicants that are on zoom or participants on zoom Please do not unmute yourselves when we are on a break that will be broadcast on TV. Thank you very much

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:52:47 · ≈ 11:52 AM

Good zoom etiquette for everybody

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction2:52:53 · ≈ 11:52 AM

All righty chair heart and members of the board if we can have mark test his microphone and see if we can hear him now I I see you speaking, but I cannot hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:07 · ≈ 11:53 AM

Yeah. All right, we'll have to take another break and will just keep working at it. All right, we're back again and I think we have worked through our issues and appreciate everyone's patience. So Mr Lloyd

2:59 – 3:1614 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:59:05 · ≈ 11:59 AM

Right here I am. Get off him.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00:01 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Mr. Chair, I think that one approach that would work or could work is since the applicant only has the one slide he can just in great detail point describe to what he's talking about. Just call it and not use his computer for that and go from there. And then we don't have a problem with him watching anything else that's occurring. It's just when he's trying to speak. And I think that would be something that I would propose if that's acceptable to Mr. Lloyd

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:00:35 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Well, I guess we just need to take another break until we get a connection of some sort. Perhaps through Mr. Ghazani's suggestion of just doing it via phone and we will have the video here or the PowerPoint slide available for board members in the public to see. So we're going to take a break for five more minutes and get this...

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:00:54 · ≈ 12:00 PM

Chair Harton, members of the Board before we take this break it looks like Mark might have changed computers is that possible Mark?

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:01:01 · ≈ 12:01 PM

No, I haven't but I have put on the phone

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:01:05 · ≈ 12:01 PM

It's perfect now. We can hear you just fine and see you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:09 · ≈ 12:01 PM

Great,

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:01:11 · ≈ 12:01 PM

great

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:11 · ≈ 12:01 PM

wonderful thank you. Thank you for working it through. All right Mr. Lloyd do you have 10 minutes? Thank you.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:01:19 · ≈ 12:01 PM

Thank You Mr. Chair sorry about the technical difficulties so can we put up my PowerPoint presentation please And let's just jump to the next slide. I think Travis did a good job of explaining the project that's before you. Basically, the proposal for the lot line adjustment and record map modification is to increase the area between the two development envelopes on the property from a 10-foot setback to a total now of 50 feet so that it's more consistent with the current rural zone district designations for the property.

On to the next slide. These issues here are a series of bullet points as to the revised building envelopes. I take it that the board has reviewed my letter that I sent and had gone through the project application, so I will I'll go over all of these for you as far as the proposal that's before you for the lot line adjustment or record map modification. Next slide, please.

So I'll go right into the opponent's assertions as to issues with this project. In 2004, the property, the opponents have asserted that there was only one driveway entry for the property and that the owner graded another. The property has always had two driveway entries for several decades now, back into at least the 1990s. The opponents have asserted that in 2004 upper reaches of the property covered in rich native habitat was destroyed and the upper reaches, the so-called Upper Mesa as it's been referred to has been subject to periodic disturbances and road repair over the decades also. This goes back at least until the late 90s, early 2000 when the so-called 2001 parcel map was being processed through the county. The applicant for that parcel map a previous owner had proposed building sites up on the upper Mesa and in fact had installed four or five sewage dry wells for testing purposes to prove that the lots would have sewage disposal capacity.

And in the course of that, did some denuding on that upper Mesa area and also improved the road in order to get the drilling equipment up there to establish those dry well locations. There was also Much eucalyptus woodland in the area and coming down the slopes. Much of it was dead and had denuded a lot of the habitat that existed there, creating a sterile understory.

In 2017, the owner engaged in efforts... The opponents have asserted that the owner has engaged in efforts to destroy the pristine habitat that existed Over the property, particularly the upper Mesa and built a new road and new entry drive without permits all for future development proposal next to the opponent's house side. In 2017 the owner engaged in cleanup of dead eucalyptus woodlands dead brush and trash piles dumped on the property in 2016 the owner coordinated with carp Summerlin fire department who undertake that fuel management cleanup A fire department showed up on site and made several visits there. And it had advised the owner as to the removal of dead brush and dead eucalyptus trees.

Also in my letter, I provided a letter from the arborist that was hired by the owner at that time to also oversee that removal. And in that letter he notes the dead brush and the dead trees and they plan to remove them. Also in the course of that work, the owner obtained an erosion control permit to improve the road, to regrade it and recontour it, and to add base material to it.

Mrs. Petrovich has asserted that the permit did not allow any graveling or paving of the road. The only prohibition that's in the permit is a prohibition on asphalt grading or paving of that driveway that goes up to the top. So there were no prohibitions on gravelling, or soil cement, or other kind of treatments to help erosion control on that property. Next slide please. The opponent has also asserted that the project M&D is inadequate due to no impact analysis or mitigations For the 2017 exempted dead tree and brush removal, and the 27 permitted road repair and maintenance. Those are simply not part of this project. The applicant engaged in outreach to the proper fire authority for fire fuel management protection on the property and inquired and applied for and received an erosion control permit to make improvements to the road, and to add other drainage facilities and siltation arresting devices.

And that was all done in 2017. The appellant at that time put forth a letter. In fact, that letter was put forth on behalf of the appellant by Ms. Petrovich. The first correspondence that we had was a letter that indicated that they had I've done some research for the county, had noted that the work was going on. That in research with the county they had noted that a permit was issued and that there was a cautioning that only up to five acres of brush was allowed to be removed by county ordinance in any 12 month period.

So the letter was not a challenge to any of the work what's going on. In fact it was an acquiescence That going on with the caution as to vegetation removal over five acres. The opponents assert that vast areas of the land were cleared and that further disturbance of ESHA resources had occurred. Again, the tree removal and brush removal that occurred was dead vegetation and dead trees. It was less than the five acre exemption permit for the county It was coordinated with the fire department as to those removals and a permit for the road was done.

Even in the most recent submittals by the appellant, there's assertions that the road did not exist, that it was graded through this pristine habitat and took out a swath of vegetation from that road. And these are just not true assertions. Onto the next slide please. So this is a copy of the erosion control plan. Down at the lower right-hand corner is the scope of work, and it includes some matters that I discussed.

On to the next slide please. This is details on the erosion control plan showing the width of the road. I believe it's shown as 18 to 20 feet existing On to the next slide, please. And again this is a blow up of those details showing the existing profile of the road. So the assertion that widening of the road has occurred through significant grading or in fact any grading at all is incorrect. Those claims were made by the appellant and a 2017 reporting of a purported violation by the appellant The county responded to that, sent a grading inspector out to review the work. And the grading inspectors' investigation showed that there was no grading associated with the roadwork or the driveway work except that it was allowed by the permit to fill in drainage rutting and to remove weeds and other vegetation that was coming up on the shoulders of the road.

So the notion of vast grading to widen the road Is unfounded and has been investigated by the county in 2017, and found to not be factual. And the owner has proceeded and completed that work with good faith or reliance on those permits from the county. Next slide please. This is a photo showing some of the dead tree conditions that existed up on the property in 2016. Next slide.

At the same time, Southern California Edison was in the area removing dead eucalyptus trees and brush that was along Toro Canyon Road. In fact, this is along the frontage of the subject property. Next slide please. This shows the dead eucalyptus removal of the second driveway. This is the beginning of the driveway that winds up up the slope and up to the upper Mesa area. This is right at the Toro Canyon Road frontage.

I believe Ms. Petrovich presented some drawings showing vegetation removal, of which she alluded to the dirt road not existing in this area. And here's a photograph of it existing and the dead eucalyptus trees that were here that were removed. Next slide please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:11:46 · ≈ 12:11 PM

Mr. Lloyd, I'm sorry your 10 minutes is over and so I guess you'll just have to save these slides for your rebuttal. So we'll get to that in a few minutes. Are there questions? Supervisor Williams. Well, I mean in absence especially if you look at Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I just want to say that as we look at aerial photos over time it does seem that the first of all the road seems to have been established before um uh the current owner owned it and the vegetation goes back and forth. I don't know if that's seasonal or if it's just that there's been periodic times that a violation didn't occur.

I for one do think it's sometimes strange when we use as a baseline current conditions that may have included a violation, but staff concluded that was not the case and to me you got to kind of go with our professional staffs opinion. That being said Mr. Lloyd I wanted to ask you I'm not saying that I support all the conditions, the additional conditions that Ms. Petrovich has asked for but I wanted to see your reaction point by point if you could to those requests for additional conditions.

Two of them I thought you already have in there so I would want to understand Maybe with the possible exception of restricting the road for the residents use if they walk up the road to have a glass of wine. I think that's well within their rights as property owners, but but with the other additional conditions. I just want to know your reaction to

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:13:46 · ≈ 12:13 PM

Well in general my reactions to the excuse me board members can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:13:52 · ≈ 12:13 PM

Yes, we sure can

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:13:54 · ≈ 12:13 PM

Yes, well the applicant's reactions to the conditions and generally those that are requiring the removal of the pre-existing driveway and revegetation of habitat that was taken out as dead brush and is regenerating. We don't believe our appropriate conditions of approval. They deal with actions that have already been litigated and judged by the county back in 2017 and are not part of this project description. However, I will note that in the conditions of approval that have been approved and voted on unanimously by the Planning Commission, and in fact conditions of approval that we voluntarily put on the project, we've in fact tightened up if you will the requirements that areas outside of the development envelopes and the driveways that go to those developments Envelopes are noted as development exclusion areas, and there could be no development whatsoever of those areas.

The existing improvements that are within them such as any utility lines or the driveway itself can continue to be maintained in their present condition but the development exclusion area precludes any development of the area outside of the development, any ground disturbance anything other than passive use of the property by by the owners. So we believe that the conditions that we proposed and were accepted by the Planning Commission, and the tweaks the Planning Commission has done are appropriate in substantial conditions to ameliorate any potential future removals that are associated with fire fuel management vegetation management So we believe that the conditions that are there, that have been approved by the Planning Commission are sufficient and that we would reject as being inappropriate any conditions that would require removal of the road or revegetation of habitat or purported habitat removal areas.

3:16 – 3:2415 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:17 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Okay. Are there any other questions at this point? Right. Do we have any public comment?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:16:24 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have no requests to speak on this item. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:27 · ≈ 12:16 PM

right let's go to the rebuttal and we'll start with the appellant Ms. Petrovich.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:16:38 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Susan if you can unmute your computer as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:16:44 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Sorry I couldn't find my mouse um I believe Mr. Alger did request to be able

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:55 · ≈ 12:16 PM

Well, we don't have a speaker slip or any notification of that. But if he is available and wants to speak, we can do that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:17:03 · ≈ 12:17 PM

Yes, thank you. The way that I see this is that we filed a complaint with the county and the county told us they couldn't take enforcement on the 2001 conditions or protect the environmentally sensitive habitat until a permit was filed. And then they assured us that once a permit was filed for development, that the entire parcel will be evaluated and subject to 2001 conditions the Toro Canyon plan and the environment sensitive habitat removal.

Our biologist, and it's even been backed by Mr. Frampton's arborist that he has removed sensitive habitat. It even describes it in the arborists letter. But anyway, the bottom line is the county let us down. And my concern is that without further protection there's just simply too much financial incentive for the applicant to deter regrowth of native vegetation and continue to prepare a market this area for future development permits all in direct conflict of the meaning and the intent of the restrictions that were placed in 2001.

We need your help. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:18:24 · ≈ 12:18 PM

Thank you for your comments. Ms. Petrovich, your rebuttal?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:18:29 · ≈ 12:18 PM

Yes thank you I will be quick. The 2001 conditions are very clear I still don't understand why they weren't enforced. But it's not staffs call, it is your call as to whether or not those conditions are going to be enforced and if these aren't those aren't conditions aren't going to be enforced then why would we expect new conditions to be enforced? As long as they don't pull up permit until after they've done the damage As you can see from those slides six and seven on Mr. Lloyd's PowerPoint, it is only for a dirt road there's no mention of paving anywhere on those plans says quite clearly that it's for dirt road. It also says no widening that they were just going to clean up the road and in fact if you look back at the slide that Tamara Klug created with the cross hatching versus It's clearly been widened.

So I would suggest to you that the only way that we can restore this vegetation on the mesa is for you to include a condition that these folks have to restore it. There was just no good reason for clearing almost two acres of brush, that is environmentally sensitive habitat Why did they do that? I believe it's part of their next step, and that is to propose development up there. But that's really beside the point. They got this lot split was originally approved subject to the condition that native vegetation be retained and it was not. And now we've got a bunch of weeds up there and a few little dead or half-dead plants that they could go back this year and whack them down. Or how about right after the winter When they tried to regenerate, let's go whack them down again because the county is not going to stop us.

So that is our concern it we do believe that you are you will be rewarding bad behavior and certainly leaving the door open to all other applicants to do the same thing just pretend like You're not really violating the conditions even if you are thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:20:54 · ≈ 12:20 PM

Thank you miss Petrovich will now go back to Mr Lloyd for his rebuttal

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:21:03 · ≈ 12:21 PM

And if Mr. Loy can unmute his phone please.

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:21:10 · ≈ 12:21 PM

How is that? Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:11 · ≈ 12:21 PM

Yes we

CommentMark BoyerProposedself-stated3:21:11 · ≈ 12:21 PM

can, thank you. Okay going back to Mr. Albers comments and these were also in Miss Petrovich's letters putting out this notion that the staff reported back to them during the 2017 interaction That the staff can't do anything until a permit is applied for, is totally non-factual. The county staff's letter to Mr. Alter in 2017 noted that the conditions of approval that dealt with development dealt with developments that would be within the development envelopes as on the map and that there was No violations of those conditions of approval or any other county policies or permit requirements for any of the work that was done in 2017 that was either exempt and still is exempt under current county policies, or was permitted. So this assertion that the staff has rebuffed Mr.

Alter in his inquiries is totally false. The staff undertook the proper permit procedures and did an investigation of reported zoning violations and found none. The notion that this is a marketing ploy by continuing to manage your property and maintain it for future development is equally unfounded. The conditions of approval that were approved by the Planning Commission will not allow for any development or anything other than passive use of the whole rest of the property outside of the approved development envelopes, no type development can occur without there being some future change through another record map modification or subdivision process that is subject to the full scrutiny of county regulations and processes. So this notion that something nefarious is going to happen and you need to take an action, a punitive action Or actions that have already been reviewed by your professional staff and found to be consistent with permits and policy is a self-serving personal reason that I'm not sure why it's being done.

There is no basis for that. And again, the conditions of approval that are on the project now through the Planning Commission or are subject to your appeal that were approved by the Planning Commission have put forth Distinct prohibitions on development over the rest of the property and only allows passive use of the property outside of the development envelopes.

Thank you, Mr Chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:00 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Thank you, Mr Lloyd. Now to this segment where we have staff comments. Mr Lee, Ms Plowman is there anything you'd like to add?

3:24 – 3:2912 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:24:11 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Mr. Chair, members of the board, I think Mr. Lee would like to just highlight some of the conditions that have been added to this map to tighten up the resource protection requirements and then also wanted to note that the letter that Ms. Petrovich referred to, Mr. Alger referred to and then described by Mr. Lloyd. Mr. Lloyd's description of what was conveyed to Mr. Alger is generally accurate in terms The findings that were made by staff in 2017.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:45 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Thank you, Miss

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:24:46 · ≈ 12:24 PM

Thomas would you like to just highlight some of those conditions.

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated3:24:55 · ≈ 12:24 PM

As part of the Planning Commission approval this past June, we modified some of the conditions that actually strengthened them over the previous tenant parcel map conditions. And it also should be noted that these will take place... These come into effect as soon as the map is recorded. Did you want

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:25:18 · ≈ 12:25 PM

specifics? Well, maybe I could just help in this question because you know and if you want to answer it's fine or like Alex Tuttle is on the line as someone who was involved in the enforcement question. You know so one of the basic questions is protection of native species will The conditions post lot split if we approve this be easier to enforce and diminish the possibility of native plant removal.

Then the previous conditions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:26:08 · ≈ 12:26 PM

Madam chair, I am oh my goodness Mister chair members of the board. I need some coffee today. What I think is, is that the conditions probably all of the conditions are enforceable. The new ones probably are not more enforceable or less enforceable it's just you have to measure them against the actions that are taken in the field and it was determined by staff that the conditions had not been violated in 2017 but we do require that applicants Follow the conditions of the map. That's why they're there and so when there is an activity that appears to violate those conditions, it'll be investigated if we get a complaint right?

It's noticed by a neighbor or Observed in some way and then a complaint is filed with the department. So I think the conditions that have been added are beneficial, obviously they call for greater protection of certain species in particular and they talk about fuel management so if I think hopefully that answers your question but Mr. Tuttle do you have anything you would like to add to that?

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:27:28 · ≈ 12:27 PM

Sure Mr. Chair, members of the board can you hear me okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:27:31 · ≈ 12:27 PM

Yes we can.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:27:32 · ≈ 12:27 PM

Okay thanks um just to tack on to what Ms. Plowman indicated the project description that would be approved as part of this project I would say does tighten up the language compared to the existing map approval as far as what's allowed inside and outside or what's not allowed outside the development envelopes So I do believe that it gives greater protection to the areas outside the envelopes than what currently exists in terms of making very clear what activities can occur, cannot occur. And it's intended to extend beyond just development but to include vegetation removal, planting of non-native vegetation things of that nature that have been the cause of concern over the last few years. So I do believe that the approval of the current request would provide for greater protection of resources on site than what exists currently.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:28:37 · ≈ 12:28 PM

Thank you, Mr. Tuttle. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.863:28:40 · ≈ 12:28 PM

How would the conditions affect the conditions on the Mesa? That is, I think there's non-native grasses. It's been cleared. I'm not sure how many acres but do the new conditions affect ongoing activities there?

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated3:28:58 · ≈ 12:28 PM

Supervisor Hartman through the chair. The new conditions are stricter than the previous map conditions and they also add onto the fact that There's more things that have to be accounted for. So previously, they only listed ash but the new conditions specifically call it the species names that must be marked on all plans for permits and as previously stated no development is allowed outside of the envelopes so that upper mesa area there's nothing allowed to be built up there and there should also not be any non-native ornamental landscaping placed up there as well including grading

3:29 – 3:3620 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:29:47 · ≈ 12:29 PM

So Mr. Chair, Supervisor Hartman it does restrict removal of native vegetation in those areas and if Mr. Tuttle wants to add anything to that he can but so it tightens up the conditions that were on the map from 2001 when it was approved and would limit native vegetation as Mr. Lee points out it identifies the specific types of vegetation that cannot be removed.

So Mr Tuttle do you want to add anything to that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:30:21 · ≈ 12:30 PM

No, I mean, I think that generally captures it. So with the Mesa area that's outside the envelopes, it's outside the current envelopes, it's outside the proposed envelopes and so no development would be allowed within that area and no vegetation or native vegetation would be allowed to be removed. And any vegetation clearance would have to be under the direction of the fire district Um, and it also has Mr Lee pointed out would prevent them from planting any new non native ornamental landscaping.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:31:03 · ≈ 12:31 PM

Any other questions or comments matters to the board supervisor excuse me that clerk you had to read some items into the record before we deliberate so thank you.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:31:15 · ≈ 12:31 PM

Yes, Chair Hart and members of the Board. Prior to the board's deliberation on this item in order to accept documents received afternoon on Friday November 6th we will need a motion to accept six documents into the record and I will read those now. The first two documents are from the applicant. The first is a letter and the second is a presentation received on Friday November 6 at 314.

The third document is the appellant's letter from Susan Petrovich received Friday November 6 at 355 The fourth is an applicant letter from Farber, Large, Archbald and Spray. Attorneys at law received Friday November 6th at 554. The fifth document is an applicant letter received from Brownstein Farber & Shrek LLP on behalf of Ms. Tamara Klug received Monday November 9th at 213.

And our final document is the appellant presentation received from Lynn Moore of Brownstein-Farber-Schreck, LLP. Received Monday November 9th at 211. And if we can get a motion to accept these documents into the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:32:20 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Is there a motion to accept the documents? So moved.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:32:23 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:32:24 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Motion's made and seconded. Any discussion? Madam Clerk could you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:32:30 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye, Mr. Adam?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:32:34 · ≈ 12:32 PM

I'm sorry, I had a couple questions. I didn't know we were at that point. This is just the documents. Just to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:32:40 · ≈ 12:32 PM

accept the

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:32:41 · ≈ 12:32 PM

documents. Documents, documents. All right, cool. And I'm going to be a yes on documents.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:32:46 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Okay.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:32:50 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adam?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction3:32:54 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:32:55 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Mr Lavinino?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction3:32:57 · ≈ 12:32 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:32:58 · ≈ 12:32 PM

I think the biggest issue here

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:33:00 · ≈ 12:33 PM

is

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:33:00 · ≈ 12:33 PM

one that it is not. Technically

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:33:02 · ≈ 12:33 PM

germane to a lot split application, It from the satellite photos assure appears to me that one of the previous owners. Mister Frampton basically created this road with a turnaround that sure that sure looks to anybody who looks at the map like pre development or right and so I completely And you know, I have tried to go through this with staff to ensure that you know essentially a further lot split the development application that Mister Alger fears is number one prohibited by the conditions.

That the Planning Commission approved and secondly would require an application that could be appealed and would be appealed to the board and I would say I would not support it. Because then the appellant's point is real, right? That we would be rewarding somebody's past transgressions. But that is not what is at issue today. What is at issue today is a development envelope that is It is one to, you know, essentially to correct and make this split more in accordance with what the Toro Canyon plan is which doesn't actually encourage clustering. Which are, you know, the previous lot configuration was done during a time when I really don't. See absent of staff concurring with the assertion that there's been a violation really don't see.

A base for the appeal supported by you know at least These conditions than in previous so I at least will be supportive of denying the appeal. Any other comments from supervisors?

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:36 – 3:4222 turns

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction3:36:15 · ≈ 12:36 PM

I guess I'll weigh in here. The Algiers had an opportunity to appeal the decision by the planning department in 2017, and I think the whole idea that there's a violation here is just wrong. There was no violation in the first place. So this is like a hoax being perpetrated on us There's just nothing wrong with this project and I think we should just approve it.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:36:53 · ≈ 12:36 PM

And Mr. Chair?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:36:55 · ≈ 12:36 PM

Yes, Supervisor Lavendino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:36:58 · ≈ 12:36 PM

And I don't think I heard it from the department, from staff. I mean, I know I heard it from Supervisor Williams and I believe it to be true but I just want to get clarification that if at any point down the road that area on the Mesa is going to be developed. If you could give me what, I know it's in violation of the conditions that are currently going to be set forth, but what would be the path and how that would be appealable?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:37:24 · ≈ 12:37 PM

Mr. Chair, members of the board and Supervisor Lavagnino, the application would be a lot split of that particular parcel and that's a discretionary application that would require review and approval I believe that would go to the zoning administrator for an activity like that. And then there would be a recorded map modification right to add, remove the requirements for that building envelope and allow for development up on that mesa so it's a discretionary action by the department that's appealable

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:01 · ≈ 12:38 PM

And the minimum lot size in that zone is 10 acres and the remaining, the parcel that is large enough is 10.67 acres so it isn't going to be possible to split that lot

CommentTravis LeeProposedself-stated3:38:13 · ≈ 12:38 PM

right? Chair Howard, that's correct. The minimum lot size is 10 acres up there. So they would not be able to split because they would need two ten acre lots to fulfill those findings. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:38:27 · ≈ 12:38 PM

And so if they did try and pursue it then it would include a rezone as well?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:32 · ≈ 12:38 PM

Pretty high bar. Any other comments from the board? Is there a motion? Did you have a comment, Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.863:38:42 · ≈ 12:38 PM

May I please? Yes. Well it isn't... The issue isn't about the lot split. It isn't about the building envelopes. It's really about the conditions and what conditions how do we really interpret the original conditions and how do we interpret the conditions now. And for me I think the appellant is concerned about the Mesa and as I hear it, you can't take out native vegetation. You can't grade but there's no restoration so if that didn't constitute development previously but now we have these additional conditions we still don't Put that back. So it's non-native kind of scraped off and I think that's what was being partly what was being discussed here, and I think that's unfortunate that it isn't going to be restored because that non-native grass can be invasive and that can get elsewhere but I think you know the our Determination of what development means wasn't as broad as perhaps people thought with those original conditions and now we've expanded the kinds of activities that are limited outside the development envelopes, the building envelopes.

So I am going to vote again for to uphold the project against the appeal but I certainly understand the appeals Justification and misunderstandings here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:40:24 · ≈ 12:40 PM

Mr Chair? Yes,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:40:26 · ≈ 12:40 PM

Supervisor Levine. Yeah, I wanted to piggyback on that a little bit because I think that's the crux of it is that the Mesa is obviously the bone of contention. And to me this is what's so frustrating sitting on so many of these over the last decade of neighbor versus neighbor when They probably spent as much going through this process in hiring attorneys as they would have with, and I know it's difficult to get along with people. And sometimes it just doesn't work and we have to go this route.

But that Mesa probably could have been restored for somewhat in the neighborhood of what was spent on this whole deliberation. So, now we've got two neighbors that are both not happy and it would have been much nicer. I know that doesn't always work out in the real world but just my two cents.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:41:21 · ≈ 12:41 PM

Thank you Supervisor Lavenino. Is there a motion? Move to uphold the project and deny the appeal. Motion has been made and seconded. Mr. Ghazzani, did you have something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:41:34 · ≈ 12:41 PM

Chair, just understanding that the motion is...that was a summary of the motion but moving all of staff's recommendations related with denying the appeal and upholding the project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:41:44 · ≈ 12:41 PM

That is correct. Motion has been made and seconded. Any discussion? Madam Clerk, would you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:41:52 · ≈ 12:41 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr Adam?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:41:54 · ≈ 12:41 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:41:56 · ≈ 12:41 PM

Mr. Lavanino. Aye. Mr. Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:42:00 · ≈ 12:42 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:42:01 · ≈ 12:42 PM

Chair Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:42:02 · ≈ 12:42 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction3:42:03 · ≈ 12:42 PM

motion passes unanimously

3:42 – 5:123 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:42:05 · ≈ 12:42 PM

we'll now recess to closed session County Council would you please read the items for consideration

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:42:13 · ≈ 12:42 PM

Chair and Supervisors, today the Board has agendized for three matters that I estimate will take someplace between an hour and an hour-and-a-half. The first is a matter of significant exposure to civil litigation and as described in more detail in the printed and online agenda this involves City of Goleta's letter of October 15th 2020 I'm here to discuss two matters concerning the 2002 revenue neutrality agreement between the city and the county. And then there are two matters of real property negotiations. The first involves the existing lease of the Beachside Cafe in the second district, parcel number 071-200-017. And the second matter of real property negotiation is the Navigation Resource Center located at 809 Chapala Street

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:43:04 · ≈ 12:43 PM

Then we'll split the difference between an hour and an hour-and-a-half, and we'll try to return from closed session at 2 o'clock. Thank you. We're now reconvening the meeting of November 10th. Will county council please report out from closed session?

5:12 – 5:288 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:12:28 · ≈ 2:12 PM

Chair and supervisors, today in closed session the board considered three matters. The first was one matter of significant exposure to civil litigation that involved the City of Goleta's letter of October 15th 2020 to the County of Santa Barbara involving the 2002 Revenue Neutrality Agreement. There were also two separate real property negotiation items. The first involving the Beachside Cafe's existing lease and that's parcel number 071-200 017 and the second was the Navigation Resource Center located at 809 Chapala Street, and there are no reportable actions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:13:05 · ≈ 2:13 PM

Thank you, Mr. Guzzone.

The next item is Departmental Item number 5. Madam Clerk would you please read that item into the record?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:13:11 · ≈ 2:13 PM

Chair Hart and members of the board, departmental item number five is from community services. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding encampments of persons experiencing homelessness in Isla Vista and a temporary emergency sheltering option for COVID-19 response.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:13:28 · ≈ 2:13 PM

So if I can start, good afternoon Chair Hart and members of the board. You know as you know during this public health emergency, encampments of people experiencing homelessness has increased in the county. I think not just our county but other counties and but a particular in Isla Vista Parks and it's becoming a problem there With that increase of course comes a number of health and safety issues both for the homeless population as well as the overall community there.

We're here before you to present an option that we think will help that situation, but before I turn it over to Kim and Dinah, I would like to say something about the option we're looking at is working with Good Samaritan. Shelters and let me just say, you know, Sylvia Bernard in good Sam have been tremendous in helping us with dealing with the homeless population during this code crisis. And my hats off to her when I was at the EOC and we were working with Santa Maria shelter. She came through, boy really picked up the ball and ran with it and took care of that situation. Really did us a huge, huge favor so we're very appreciative of what she does and the skill set that she brings with her in experience. So I want to thank her. I know she's listening and I want to make sure that she does hear that we do really appreciate her.

And now I will, unless you want to say something, I'll turn it over.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:14:50 · ≈ 2:14 PM

I just want to agree with you 100% and say thank you Ms. Bernard and the folks at Good Sam. They have really been a help this whole time. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:14:58 · ≈ 2:14 PM

So with that, I'll turn it over to Dinah and Kim to do the presentation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:15:03 · ≈ 2:15 PM

All right, Chair Hart, members of the Board of Supervisors. As George mentions today's presentation is to provide an update on the continuing efforts to prevent prepare for and respond to their coronavirus and then move to the impacts specifically of encampments in Isla Vista and present a concept for temporary emergency shelter to address the immediate health and safety needs of residents. Santa Barbara County has a critical need for additional housing and shelter That has been amplified by the coronavirus pandemic.

The recommended actions before the board today are to receive and file the presentation regarding homeless encampments in Isla Vista, to provide conceptual approval of the option outlined in this report regarding temporary emergency shelter and navigation support services. And direct staff to return with an agreement or agreements to facilitate the establishment and operation of a temporary emergency shelter in Isla Vista. Provide other direction as appropriate and determine that the recommended action is not subject to CEQA.

In March, a 2019 Homelessness Response Task Force was formed and has continued to meet and plan throughout the public health emergency. The task force and the Santa Maria and Santa Barbara County Continuum of Care have focused on four key objectives to prevent prepare for and respond to coronavirus. Access to basic services was extremely limited in the initial shutdown and remains a significant challenge for persons experiencing homelessness.

The first objective is to prevent and mitigate COVID-19 impacts for persons who remain unsheltered through support centers and outreach, we've been able to reestablish access to showers device charging food and hygiene supplies. The second objective is to place as many persons as possible in housing With increased funding and prevent persons impacted by covid from losing their housing through an increase in emergency rental assistance for low income households. Emergency rental assistance has already helped 294 households, and the effort is ongoing.

The 3rd objective has been to sustain shelter capacity. By covering COVID related costs for existing shelters and funding and operating a congregate shelter at Santa Maria High School when services were significantly reduced in North County. In the 1st, months of the pandemic as Mr chapter mentioned the 4th objective is to establish non congregate shelter. Non-congregate shelter has been provided for qualifying veterans, persons that are COVID positive and not able to self isolate operated by the public health department.

And serve persons most at risk of developing complications from COVID 19, the medically fragile and person's over 65 years of age. Roomkey South, the largest of those projects has served the highest risk persons in temporary emergency shelter in Santa Barbara since April 20th. And the Roomkey South project has served about 130 guests now, and over 50% of those guests exiting the project have transitioned to permanent housing.

A public health emergency has resulted in an increase in encampments that communities have been struggling to address. This map, courtesy of Heal the Ocean, monitors encampments along the South Coast with an emphasis on the transportation corridors. They report a significant increase in the number of camps and the footprint of those camps which has been confirmed by many community members and outreach workers. And while there's no comparable effort in North County to measure the number of encampments and their footprint, North County jurisdictions observe similar growth in encampments and impacts.

As many camps have gone undisturbed, the amount of belongings and debris have exponentially grown and County Fire reports that 37 pyres had been attributed to a campment so far in 2020 County staff receives many calls to remove encampments across Santa Barbara County, and there are significant limitations to consider when addressing or removing encampments. Some of them up on the screen and the public health emergency has made encampment management even more complicated and challenging.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has asked that communities consider allowing encampments to remain where they are unless housing is available. They have also provided considerations for increased sanitation services and adequate distancing. As the stay-at-home order was implemented, a large increase in persons experiencing homelessness and growth in encampments began happening in the Isla Vista Parks This has created an unsafe environment for the people living in the encampments and the community at large.

Conditions include increased risk of fire, as recently noticed by the County Fire Department, an increase in calls for service by law enforcement, and a rapid deterioration of the parks. As the number of persons living in the parks and Isla Vista surged, a working group was formed to address concerns and conditions for the persons in encampments. And a number of actions have been taken as shown including installation of additional hygiene equipment outreach staff providing COVID education and services. As well as removal of excess debris and waste.

And these efforts have not unfortunately resulted in a decrease in encampments or the number of persons living in encampments. In fact, we're still seeing that number rise today. In response to a public health emergency, a temporary emergency shelter is a viable option and can be funded as part of the community's coronavirus response. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has issued guidelines shown for the use of a temporary emergency shelter. And much like the temporary emergency shelters at Santa Maria High School and Roomkey South, a temporary emergency shelter in Isla Vista Would attempt to prevent and protect the community from the spread of disease, and address other safety concerns and community impacts.

County staff has been working with stakeholders including the Isla Vista Community Service District and the Isla Vista Recreation and Parks District to address the impacts of encampments and identify the most appropriate location and housing model for a temporary shelter in Isla Vista. County staff is proposing a temporary non-congregate shelter concept of up to 40 beds through the use of the Isla Vista Community Center and the installation of up to 20 pallet houses on the adjacent parking lot owned by Isla Vista Recreation and Parks District.

In addition to the pallet houses, trailers with showers, restrooms and handwashing stations would be installed. And this project would require an emergency permit to be issued by the Director of the Planning and Development Department. And General Services would work on a use agreement with the Isla Vista Recreation and Parks District for the portion of the parking lot they own.

The Isla Vista Community Center is county property. The pallet houses are reusable eight foot by eight foot dwellings and communities across California have installed villages of the pallet houses to create temporary shelter. In fact, I had the opportunity yesterday to travel with Sylvia Bernard to a 30 house pallet house shelter in the city of Riverside operated by CityNet which is one of our partners in this endeavor.

The project has been operating since March of 2020 and it was really inspiring to see how grateful that their guests were for the shelter. The cost per unit is about $8,000 which includes assembly of the unit at the site. And CARES funds or Coronavirus Relief Funds would be used to purchase the units and each unit has electrical outlets lighting and a heater.

Good Samaritan Shelter has been identified as the proposed operator of the temporary emergency shelter. And if the county were to move forward with an agreement with Good Samaritan, it will include coordinating outreach navigation and shelter services in Isla Vista. Good Samaritan would lead the logistics for installation and operation of the shelter security and good Samaritan staff Would be present 24 hours a day, seven days per week. And in addition to meals the shelter access to showers and restrooms Good Samaritan County Departments and other nonprofit providers will provide intensive case management housing navigation substance abuse intervention opportunities assistance with obtaining vital documents linking to health care and benefits that the participant may need or be eligible for County departmental support is critical to a successful effort to shelter and housing of persons experiencing homelessness in Isla Vista as it is across the whole county.

And nearly all departments will be assisting in some way, and we've tried to give you an idea what some of those contributions would be. And costs associated directly with the project will be tracked for potential reimbursement in the event more coronavirus relief funds are made available to communities. The shelter would be time limited. If all permits and approvals and agreements are completed, and this board blesses those efforts, the completed shelter would open in mid-December and close in mid-June, if we could get across those finish lines.

In June, mid-June of 2021 the location and funding available does not allow for the shelter operation to be extended past the six month period and therefore Good Samaritan and partners will be consistently working to transition and prepare guests for alternate shelters transitional housing and permanent housing opportunities The project would implement a ramp down in the final 60 days of program operation to incrementally reduce the number of participants through attrition. There's some other ideas on here.

The estimated cost of the Isla Vista Temporary Emergency Shelter is $900,000 and additional infrastructure costs are still being assessed The pallet houses with shipping and assembly represent about $160,000 of that cost. And as mentioned the units are reusable. The funding sources are both from the Coronavirus Relief Act or CARES funding which the county has recently been awarded Emergency Solutions Grant CARES funds that would fund the shelter operations while outreach and capital costs would come from the seven-and-a-half million dollar CARES fund allocated to vulnerable populations by this board.

And the outcomes include that we anticipate about 50 guests being served, about 4,000 bed nights of shelter being provided. Good Samaritan has proposed that about 15% of persons that they serve would achieve a safe long-term housing placement and that all shelter guests would be linked with vital services. So kind of a summary here. The temporary emergency shelter concept is to address the immediate health and safety impacts for persons experiencing homelessness. Good Samaritan is committed to being an exceptional operator, and as George mentioned community services is grateful for the partnership of Good Samaritan and Sylvie Bernard and her team throughout the COVID-19 response.

Again we are proposing at the Isla Vista Community Center in adjacent parking lot up to 20 reusable pallet houses and support trailers for six months of operation, which we are tentatively thinking would be from December 2020 to June 2021. We would need extensive county departmental support and intensive case management and housing navigation services would be provided. And last night the Isla Vista Recreation and Parks District did meet and all district board members voted to provide conceptual approval of the temporary emergency shelter The need for shelter, housing and shelter interventions with services has been a consistent theme of both the IV Working Group and the COVID-19 Homelessness Task Force.

So again, the recommended action that the Board of Supervisors receive and file the report provide conceptual approval of the Temporary Emergency Shelter and Navigation Support Services That directs staff to return with an agreement and agreements to facilitate the establishment and operation of the shelter. And provide other direction, and determine that the recommended action is not subject to CEQA. That concludes staff's presentation, and we are available to answer questions.

5:28 – 5:4012 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:28:57 · ≈ 2:28 PM

Thank you Ms. Albers for the excellent presentation. Are there questions for staff? Supervisor Williams. Do we have a sense of what the structures are? Do you already have a vendor for that? You know, it's... What's the level of space? That sort of thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:29:23 · ≈ 2:29 PM

So the vendor is called the Palette Company and that is what several communities have been using and that is the site that we visited yesterday used that model And the pictures I showed in the slide are specifically from that vendor. So we, I can tell you that it looked in person exactly what it looked like in the presentation with the two beds of an electric panel, a light and a heater. Got

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:29:48 · ≈ 2:29 PM

it. And then I guess the, you know, I would just hope that...and I think you know this obviously from Reports from fire that obviously it's not just the camps in Isla Vista that are health and safety hazard. You know, I think we need to redouble our efforts to offer housing throughout the region. And I hope this spurs us to continue that and obviously serves as perhaps a model.

But even where there is not housing available, I think we need to think about the use of expanding our use of non-congregate hotel rooms and so forth to achieve the same end.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:30:46 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Thank you Supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:30:50 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Any other questions or comments? Okay. Is there a public comment?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:30:55 · ≈ 2:30 PM

Chair Hart and members of the board, we have two requests to speak on this item. And we're going to Father John Hedges to be followed by Emily Allen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed5:31:07 · ≈ 2:31 PM

Good day. This is Father John Hedges. I'm speaking as a resident of Isla Vista and I want to be very careful to state That I am expressing my own opinions here and not those of any of my several community affiliation. So Chair Hart and members of the board, that many of our American neighbors face the pandemic this winter while sleeping rough on our streets and in our public open space is in itself a disaster.

It is a category five no less than what I saw After Katrina, Sandy and Michael. And as in those hurricanes our response needed to be wise as well as compassionate and a triage resource that were already scarce it would be so effective if we were to be wise as well as compassionate and the triage resources. We have a moral As well as a fiduciary responsibility here.

I have listened to the Isla Vista encampment work group through many filters of experience and am persuaded that the response of the pallet house shelters with support services and security infrastructure is to our current crisis, a wise respond by several proven measures first While short-term, the plan offers a case managed bridge to further evidence based steps.

Second, the shelters themselves could be stored for future repurposing during another event. This is a wise template for disaster preplanning. Who knows when we ourselves might need them after a tsunami or an earthquake? The plan responds Thank you very much, Father John.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:33:43 · ≈ 2:33 PM

We will now go to Emily Allen who is our final speaker.

PresenterEmily Allen I'mHomeless and Veteran Impact Initiatives for United Way Home4Good in Barbara CounProposedself-stated5:33:49 · ≈ 2:33 PM

Good afternoon Chair and Board Members, my name is Emily Allen I'm the Director of Homeless and Veteran Impact Initiatives for United Way Home4Good in Barbara County. Home4Good is a four impact program that supports our coordinated entry system that engages individuals and families experiencing homelessness with optimal resources for their needs And we do this because we believe everyone deserves a safe place to call home for good.

We support the conceptual approval of the Temporary Emergency Shelter Concepts in Isla Vista. The project would meet immediate needs and focus on long-term solutions through both services and housing navigation. If the temporary emergency shelter concept pilot project is successful, and we certainly hope it is, and will work with all of the organizations make it successful, it would serve as a model for similar situations in other parts of the county.

Again we look forward to working with the County and Good Samaritan to ensure people experiencing homelessness in Isla Vista achieve long-term solutions. Thank you for your consideration.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:34:58 · ≈ 2:34 PM

Thank you very much Emily. And that concludes public comments on the matters back to Board Supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:35:07 · ≈ 2:35 PM

Thank you, Chair Hart. There's no question that COVID has amplified the housing problems that we have countywide and really revealed some of the underlying difficulties that we face in Isla Vista though the population has over doubled in the past several months and there are small parks that are adjacent to residential areas If there's a fire, for example, and we do have the Fire Marshal's notice saying that there is a significant fire hazard there. It could endanger the encampments because there is such an accumulation of materials there.

And it could endanger readily the houses that are right adjacent to these encampments So this is a pilot and originally we were thinking maybe we could do something like a fire camp. We wanted to have individual places to sleep, perhaps tents but with the issues of rainy season and it's been really cold The pallet houses were, I think an elegant solution is a nice way as Father John said.

He has been a key advisor on these issues for many years in Isla Vista and has been part of the working group of late. And so to have their support for this project and Emily Allen as well who's worked long on this, I think attests to the potential for this to be a good pilot for elsewhere. And I just wanted to echo what Mr. Chapshian said about Sylvia Bernard.

She is really a treasure in our county that you can find place and you can find structures But can you find capable people to oversee these places? And that's what there's a tremendous, there aren't a lot of people who can do it. And she and Good Sam can and they do it extremely well and we're so fortunate to have them. I get up every morning recently and just so glad that they had the letter of submittal saying they would be interested in this project It so happens, I just learned last night that Sylvia is a UCSB alum and characteristically is doing this good work kind of spinning out from there.

So again it's a pilot we can learn a lot. It's desperately needed. We have really dire situation there and so I'm hoping that my board members Fellow board members will be as enthusiastic as I am about this pilot and where we can go after this. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:38:04 · ≈ 2:38 PM

Thank You supervisor Hartman And I want to thank you personally for all of the leadership and the hard work that you and your staff have done To help lead this task force to come up with all kinds of ideas and really carefully vet all the options working directly with the Department of Community Services and And the Isla Vista Recreation and Park District, and the Isla Vista Community Services District, the University. So many people have been really digging in hard to come up with a creative, innovative solution to this really challenging situation. It's really inspiring to know that the community services district and all the people involved at Room Key South have been able to place You know, 50% of the people that have gone through that facility.

That's an extraordinary accomplishment and it really gives me confidence that with that spirit and that approach You know, we're going to make a big difference here. And this is a really tough population that is going to require a lot of people working together to help get placed in housing and that this is really an innovative option that we're going to employ here to try. So thank you again for taking the lead on this.

Supervisor Williams? Well I think the success of the non-congregate Shelter Rinki South in terms of being able to be an entry point for people into housing, you've demonstrated. And if that can be repeated in this case it will be a real resounding success and obviously I think even absent of that level A better health and human safety can be achieved with the ballot house than at camps.

Sorry to go back to dollars and cents, but it's just really important for me because every once in a while I get approached by different kinds of vendors with different kinds of these temporary housing products. I wanna understand what's a good deal and what isn't. So we're buying 20 of these, what is the cost per unit?

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:40 – 5:4420 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:40:17 · ≈ 2:40 PM

So the beginning cost just winds at the base cost from the pallet company, the one that we're looking at is just $2,450. But once you add shipping assembly adding the electrical component where we're budgeting $8,000 per unit so there's quite a bit of add-on to that initial cost.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:40:43 · ≈ 2:40 PM

That's a very inexpensive option I think what people were saying earlier about praising and thanking Good Sam is

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:41:15 · ≈ 2:41 PM

It's also part of this because the cost for these things is a lot in services, and it's a lot that they were going to be asked to do So it's not it is the cost of the pallets. It's the cost of the services We're having an agreement with ivy reckon parks But it would be if we were replicating it'd be the land be additional costs so just wanted to point that out

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:41:39 · ≈ 2:41 PM

All right Mr.. Chaption

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:41:42 · ≈ 2:41 PM

Yes, Chair. Thank you and just to temper some expectations because I think staff and the service providers that did a great job out in Roomkey South this population is going to be a little bit more difficult than The population that was at Roomkey South so the successes may be a little less than what we had at Roomkey South But I think Supervisor Williams right anything that we do is gonna help here whole temporary basis But I just want to temper that a little bit

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:07 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Well, our expectations and then outperform that. That's smart engineer Scotty tactics right there well said. Supervisor

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.825:42:19 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Hart I would just say you know we wish you all the best and well you know we've got our own issues here as well so there's gonna be a lot of eyes on this project to see how it works and good luck

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:32 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Thank you, Supervisor Lavanino. Any other comments? Is there a motion?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.865:42:40 · ≈ 2:42 PM

I would move staff recommendation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:42 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Second. Motion has been made and seconded. Any discussion of the motion? Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll?

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:42:49 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Ms. Hartman? Aye. Mr. Adams?

CommentEva CamarenaProposed · by introduction5:42:53 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Aye.

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:42:53 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Mr Lavanino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.825:42:54 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Aye!

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:42:56 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Mr. Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:57 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:42:58 · ≈ 2:42 PM

And Chair Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:59 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Aye

GuestLavininoProposed · by introduction5:42:59 · ≈ 2:42 PM

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:43:01 · ≈ 2:43 PM

Thank you for that. Today I would like to adjourn in memory of Lori Romano. Lori passed away on Saturday, October 24th with her loving family by her side. Lori served as the 2nd District Commissioner on the South Board of Architectural Review from 2007-2009 and from 2012 until September 2020. Lori was a long-time American Institute of Architects member, Santa Barbara Allied Affiliate member and a supporter of the Architectural Foundation of Santa Barbara as well as being very active in the local design community serving on both the City of Santa Barbara's Architectural Board Review and the County South Board of Architectural Review for many years.

As one of the principals at Arcadia Studios Landscape Architecture, her local work has been recognized with awards from the Goleta Valley Beautiful and Santa Barbara Beautiful organizations. She was the principal in charge of the Santa Barbara Central Library Plaza project at the time of her death. Lori was an exceptional person in so many ways and she will be dearly missed by her family friends and colleagues.

We are now adjourned to Tuesday November 17th 2020