BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 October 12, 2021

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:04 – 0:075 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:11

Good morning, there we are. All right good morning I call to order the October 12th 2021 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll call, called by Todd Wilson
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavinino? I'm here. Supervisor Williams? Here. Supervisor Hart? Here. Supervisor Hartman? Here and Chair Nelson? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈21s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:31

at this time please stand and join the board in pledging allegiance to the flag

Madam Clerk, are there any announcements or changes to the agenda today?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:02

Chair Nelson and members of the board, I have a couple quick announcements today. I would like to remind the public that the Board of Supervisors meetings are being interpreted and broadcast live in Spanish. We are broadcasting our meetings in Spanish both for Cox Cable subscribers in South County as well as Comcast Cable subscribers in North County. Members of the public can now view our meetings in Spanish by turning on the secondary audio programming also known as SAP or SAP under their language settings.

Lastly, I would like to remind the public who are participating in our meeting today of the board's updated methods of public participation. For the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page two of the agenda Members of the public can attend meetings in person in both the Santa Maria Board Hearing Room Chambers as well as the Santa Barbara Board Hearing Room Chamber.

Please note on October 5, 2021 an additional County Health Officer order went into effect requiring indoor mask usage for everyone over two years of age regardless of vaccination status. If you attend the board meeting in person, you will be required to wear a face covering or mask at all times regardless of vaccination status. Information regarding how to properly wear a mask has been posted throughout both locations.

As a friendly reminder, masks should cover your nose and mouth. Wear the mask from the bridge of your nose all the way under your chin. Tighten any loops or ties so the mask is snug. If you do not have a mask that fits properly we can provide you with one. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment virtually may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2.

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing important information about joining the virtual meeting. Once the chair has announced the item you want to comment on please join the meeting with the information provided in the registration confirmation email. You will be placed on mute until it is your turn to speak The clerk will call you by name. When removed from mute, you will hear a notification that your line has been unmuted. If you are using a touchtone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself. Again if you're using a touchtone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself.

Each person may address the board for up to three minutes and this is at the discretion of the chair. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the clerk of the board's office at area code 805-568-2240. Again that's 805-568-2240 and that concludes my announcements this morning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:40

Thank you Madam

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:40

Clerk. The next item of business is the County Executive Officer's Report. CEO Miyasato do you have anything to report today?

0:07 – 0:148 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:49

Chair Nelson and board members, as you know there is an Al-Asal fire occurring in the South County today. We are trying to get Chief Hartwig on the line. I'm checking, is he on the line? He is on the line for a quick status update and then he will be followed by our OEM Director Kelly Hubbard who can talk about the numbers we have in our evacuation center. So Chief Hartwig...

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.688:13

He's by phone

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:24

Chief Hartwood, you are muted. You may need to press star six.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:36

How's that CEO? Perfect

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:38

we can hear you thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:40

Yes, you're welcome. If I could give you a quick update. I'm actually up at the Tahiga landfill right now And one of our highest priorities is to protect this facility. I want to give you a quick overview of the fire and where we are at this morning, kind of a projection and then a little bit more specifically about the landfill here and after tying in with some of Director McAulpin's staff here.

We're at about 6,000 acres still high winds somewhat erratic And we expect those for a few hours today with maybe a little bit of relief where we expect maybe an onshore flow, which is good news and bad news. We expect that to run up into the canyons where the fire's well established. And then we expect in an evening down slope wind again this evening Started up on the Camino Cielo right at about Allisaw Lake, and not a lake I'm familiar with until today.

On the other side of the ridge and quickly blew over held up on the top of the ridge there above Tahecus Canyon for about an hour and then came into alignment with the wind in blue all the way to the coast my way to landfill this morning we still have active fire along both sides of the freeway on the 101 between El Capitan where the Incident Command Post is and where the landfill is.

It burned into Tahigas, into Barron Canyon and now is on the establishing itself on the west side of Rufufio Canyon. We have structure protection in place and we have some perimeter control or direct attack but very little At this point, because of the terrain and the fire conditions. We have about 600 firefighters we have a lot of aircraft on order which would really help. We won't get any help from the aircraft they're grounded because of the wind and we're hoping that when the winds die down in a little bit, we can get a lot of aircraft in here with retardant and knock some of Steam out of the forward progress of the fire, which at this point continues to burn East and South. It's already burned to the coast on the south so it's burning east down towards El Capitan, which is the projection for the fire.

The modeling still shows that 7500 acres plus we're about 6000. We have more resources on order and zero containment at this point. When I left last night, the ICP last night we were good. There was a stand made here yesterday as it made a run towards the landfill. If you're familiar with the facility there's the ADF up top, the MRF about mid slope and then some of the intake kind of reception facilities down below.

The ADF really had no damage to it at all. There was a grinder that was set aside kind of out in a field that took some damage, it looked like. And then some of the infrastructure, some of the piping and the infrastructure that carries the methane gas has taken some fire damage as well. The MRF has a digester or some type of wood chip processing Mechanism next to it.

I won't even after talking with some of the staff, I would try to be an expert on that but that is on fire right next to the MRF and we have resources on it even as I speak with county staff too. To keep that in check or to put it out where we're not really sure working with the engineers there at the facility to try to figure out how to best attack It might be a digester, if I'm not mistaken that there might be some damage to that digester. But for the most part, damage to the Tahequs facility is minimal and again, a lot of props to the firefighters but also to Director McAulpin's staff here at Tahequs and their work even as we speak right now and then of course their assistance Here and my point of contact has been a Travis has been a big, big help over the last couple days here.

So I wish they had better news we're hoping for better conditions that's going to help us a lot and of course it will also help the air efforts. I'll be here for the day or so. And if you need anything, please feel free CEO Mayor Soderlund Board Chair Nelson and board to give me a holler. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:10

Thank you, Chief Hartwig. We have a question for you from Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8214:16

Good morning, Chief Hartwig. Have any structures been damaged?

0:14 – 0:1914 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed14:24

We believe that the only confirmed damage to any structure at all is to the Tahigas digester, at this point. And maybe again as I described this grinder, as far as any structures damaged up along Rufufio and Tahigas we don't have any reports of structure damage yet and we have structure protection in place Specifically where most of the structures are, which is off of Rufufio Road there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:57

Thank you Chief Edward. Any other questions from the Board? Supervisor Williams are you all right down there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed15:07

I'm okay just that well I think we can ask some staff about damage to the gas system later.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:18

All right thank you Supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:20

We also have Kelly Hubbard, our OEM director who can give you a brief update on who was in the evacuation shelters last night. Ms.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed15:27

Hubbard? At our evacuations shelter at Dos Pueblos High School we had 18 individuals overnight 14 of those are actually Amtrak riders who were stranded for the evening and so this morning Amtrak is working with our local Um, and TD and partners to get those individuals to their final destination. And then we had 4 who were evacuees from the fire area. And so we'll continue to work with American Red Cross in our local partners there to support those individuals with any sheltering that they may need going into today in this evening.

Just as a reminder, we do have our large animal evacuation at the Earl Warren grounds. And if there's any need for any animal evacuation assistance they can call Animal Services at 805-681-4332. We do still have an area of both an evacuation order and evacuation warning so those residents who are within that evacuation warning We do have SCE power outage at the request of fire to But just for your awareness as well, you'll start hearing we do have a PG&E in North County which is a public safety power shutoff that is unrelated to the fire.

But we do have some customers in North County who are currently without power and some expected potentially additional customers later this week with increased winds expected later this week again. So just for your awareness that isn't fire related when for PG& But it is associated with a potential public safety power shut off. And I can take any questions if needed.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:34

Ms. Hubbard, can you just remind everyone where they can find information on the incident on our website?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed17:39

Yes, sorry. Very little sleep last night. I apologize. So we do have information up on ReadySBC.org. We are updating that information as we speak and starting to get more information onto that website about the various resources and information regarding the incident. Any members of the public who are not registered for emergency alerts can also register for alerts On that website, there's a click register for ready SPC alerts.

When you go to the readysbc.org website, you click the red banner at the top and that will take you to the incident page with more information.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:19

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:23

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:25

Yes, Supervisor Williams please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:26

Just maybe a reiteration of what the areas that are under evacuation order and evacuation warning. The last email I read said everything west of El Capitan Ranch to Tohigas but I don't know if that's expanded?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed18:51

And the board evacuation order. So that is an order for a Royal Hondo Canyon, Refugio Canyon and the area between El Capitan State Beach State Park and West Camino Cielo. And then evacuation warning includes the area east of El Capitan Beach State Park and west of Dos Pueblos Canyon Road and south south of West Camino Cielo. And that evacuation map is linked on the ReadySVC website as well.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6819:24

Thank you, Ms. Hubbard.

0:19 – 0:2617 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:27

All right, so no further questions from the board? Thank you, CEO Miyasato and Chief Hartwig and Ms. Hubbard for your hard work.

The next item is approval of the administrative agenda. Do any board members request appointing items? You good down there, Supervisor Williams? I'm good. All right, Madam Clerk, has there been any items pulled by the public?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction19:52

Turn Nelson and members of the board. We have one item pulled from the public, and that is administrative Item number four

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:59

OK? Alright, so let's go ahead and pull that item from the balance and can I get a motion to prove items A. The administrative agenda without administrative item A4. A motion by Supervisor Hartman and a second by Supervisor Hart. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Oh, sorry let me I need you to do a roll call. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 Moved by Joan Hartmann · Seconded by Joan Hartmann motion by Supervisor Hartman and a second by Supervisor Hart. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Oh, sorry let me I need you to do a r
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino. Aye! Supervisor Williams. Aye Supervisor Hart. Aye Supervisor Hartman. Aye And Chair Nelson. Aye
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction20:37

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:38

Okay, taking the discretion of the chair I'm going to go ahead and

move to item A-17 first before going to A-4. This is one of our honorary resolutions and I want to make sure that we take this opportunity to recognize The recipients and then we'll let the general public, then

we'll move on to item A4 at that time. I personally have some questions and I know the public has some comments. I believe Dr. Dover is also available there and public comment on this item will be kept till two minutes. So with that Madam Clerk, please read Item A17 into the record.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction21:14

Good afternoon, members of the board. Administrative item number 17 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming October 2021 as Arts and Humanities Month in Santa Barbara County. And joining us via Zoom today we have Kyle Abello, Stacey Kiss and John Sanchez from the Bealton Arts and Culture Committee. I'll go ahead and read the resolution.

Whereas the month of October has been recognized as National Arts and Humanities Month by the White House and Congress for 36 years. And whereas the Board of Supervisors formed the County Arts Commission in 1977 to support, foster, and encourage participation in and access to arts and culture for all county residents. And whereas art, culture and creative expression uniquely sustain and inspire identity and belonging acknowledge celebrate and bridge differences support equitable and resilient communities reflect our shared humanity and help us to reimagine more.

just and inclusive features. And whereas the County Arts Commission established the Leadership in Arts Award in 2006 to honor leaders that have made a significant impact on arts and culture in our region through visionary thinking, an exemplary commitment to promoting sustaining and advancing community through the arts And whereas for the 2021 Leadership in Arts Award, the Arts Commission has selected the City of Buelton's Arts and Culture Committee recently established by Buelton City Council to bring artistic and cultural experiences to the community.

And whereas Buelton's multi-year arts funding commitment has supported projects including sculpture at the San Ynez Valley Botanic Garden Murals depicting local parks, strolling musicians and exhibits on the Avenue of Flags unifying artists and citizens together through the power of art. And now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims October as National Arts and Humanities Month and commends cultural practitioners institutions and supporters for their vital role in improving the quality of life for all residents past and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:31

Thank you, Madam Clerk. I'll give an opportunity for Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8223:35

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Well, I'm just so proud. I have a Buellton mailing address. I live just outside the city but consider it my hometown and art makes you see things anew. When I'm driving by the Avenue of Flags and I see that there's new pieces of art or I'm going through the Botanic Garden and see the works that have been there, it just wakes me up and I see it in a way I've never seen it before. And it takes a lot of work And this committee has really put in a lot of work. And so we're all grateful, we all benefit from it and thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:13

Thank you Supervisor Hartman. Mr. Abello?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed24:18

Yes, Mr. Chair and members of the board I'm so grateful for being recognized. I'd like to introduce Vice Mayor John Sanchez who would like to say thanks on behalf of the city

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed24:33

Thank you very much to the Arts Commission for giving us the award and it's quite a surprise for the little city that could, and it's new to us. And it's a pleasure to work with the artists that brought in all their hard work to make the city a little nicer place to live and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed24:52

thank you for the recognition. And another one of our arts and culture committee members Stacy Kiss

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed25:00

We want to thank you for this recognition. community member artists and really included them in the wider project that we've all endeavored to create for the community. And it's been really well received and loved, and we're looking forward to continuing it in the future. Thank you very much for this wonderful honor. I'd like to also say that if you go to cityofbulton.com In the what's new program, there is the arts and culture program that you can click on.

And there's a place for artists to go and submit their ideas and present them to us for future funding.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8225:56

And I've got your certificate here, Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez, so I drop it by City Hall?

0:26 – 0:3115 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction26:09

Sorry Kyle, you are still on mute. Did you?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed26:13

We just said yes, yes thank you that would be wonderful

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction26:16

alright

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed26:17

alright

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction26:17

thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:19

Thank you city of Builton and thank you Supervisor Hartman for that. All right, with that we're going to go ahead and get to our last item in the administrative agenda before moving on to general public comment. And just for members of the public that may want to speak on COVID or COVID related issues in general public comment actually A4 would be the item that you would see speaking on so just for those who are not aware General Public Comment is a Typically, for items that are not on our agenda. We've purposely kept COVID on our administrative agenda so it could create an opportunity for the public to be able to ask you to address the board and for the board members to ask questions of staff. So just want to make sure that everybody's aware of how that will proceed through this item.

So with that Madam Clerk we please read Item A4 into the record?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction27:13

Thank you, Chair Nelson and members of the board administrative item number four is from the county executive office. It is to consider recommendations regarding an update on the Coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. And we have 10 requests to speak from the public on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed27:29

All right before we get to the public. Over the last week, had a few questions in my email box about my question to Dr. Anzorg about case rates and CDC transmission guidelines and whether we're in the high level or substantial or moderate or whatnot. And I think there was some confusion in my question and then the answer from Dr. Anzorg My question at that time was, are we still in the high transmission level and at what level would be below that? And I think Dr. Dobernoso is available to clarify that answer at this time.

CommentGeneral Public CommentProposed28:08

Good morning. Good morning, Board of Supervisors. With regards to our current rate which is above 11 according to the old California blueprint system we would be in tier one or the widespread category which means that our new cases are above are above 10 per 100,000 per day. So when with regards to the CDC tier with a case rate of over 11 we would be considered in their low category however, however per the CDC website this morning we are at the substantial level which signifies a case rate A 50 to 99 new cases per 100,000 and this is because of the seven day average with a four day lag.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed29:16

Yeah, Dr. Dover knows I think that's what's really important is 11 cases but you guys for everybody in the public you need to think 11 times 7 so we're really at 77 cases which puts you in substantial category. You know the idea hopefully is that once we get below seven cases per day which would be below 50 then we'd be in a moderate transmission and I know that's where the CDC recommends Reducing the mask mandates and I know that you guys will be looking at that. The other positive news as I was doing my research on this, and again, I think the public will bring it up because I think it gives us the opportunity to clarify the issue is on the test positivity rate. And so as far as a test positivity rate is, I believe we're at about 3% for our county which pits us actually at the low transmission level according to CDC guidelines which is 0-5% for low and 5 to 8% for moderate.

So we're doing a great job on test positivity, and I think that's something that should be celebrated and recognized. So thank you for clarifying that Dr. De Bruno.

CommentGeneral Public CommentProposed30:17

Chair Nelson if I may clarify so what I typically share with the public is that when we share the case rate, you want to take that number. So in this case it's 11 and you multiply by 4.5 because of our county population. So it's 11 times 4. number of cases that is being recorded.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:42

All right, thank you Dr. DeRosso. With that we're going to go and is there any other questions for staff from the board before I go to general public comment? Right Madam Clerk do we still have 10 speakers on this item?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction30:55

Chair Nelson and members of the board, we now have 11 requests to speak on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:58

item. So we're going to go ahead and go to the public on this item. And at this time I am closing the public comment period on this item. And as I mentioned before each speaker will have two minutes to comment on Item A4. Madam Clerk?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction31:12

Chair Nelson and members of the board, We will begin on Zoom with Lisa Huff to be followed by Dr Amy Smith.

0:31 – 0:3813 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6831:21

Welcome Miss Huff

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction31:28

And Lisa, I have unmuted. Oh perfect, great thank you. You can please

CommentLisa HuffProposed31:31

provide your comments. Thank you, you're very nice thank you. Okay with forest fires the firefighters create fire breaks by cutting the grass and clearing debris because fire can't burn dirt. Dirt is immune to fire it doesn't burn rock and water are immune from fire these act to halt the progression likewise every year viruses come take out the weakest and most vulnerable while the young and the healthy When they get sick, recover and develop natural immunity. So after a few weeks the virus has run out of dry tinder. There's no one left in the population that is vulnerable and the virus recedes. This is basic epidemiology. It makes no sense to vaccinate a child who has zero chance of dying from COVID unless they have major pre-existing health conditions.

It has been well documented that children almost never spread COVID to adults And because they generally have zero to minimal symptoms and develop strong immunity after exposure to COVID, they act as a stop gap. An immunological fire break if you will for the community. The rate of COVID deaths in children is less than from the flu and we never masked kids for flu season. These vaccines are giving kids heart inflammation at 30 times the usual rate that will irreparably scar and damage their hearts More children will die from the vaccine than from COVID. The vaccine is not medically necessary for children, and we are depriving them of acquiring true natural immunity.

Thank you.

CommentAmy SmithProposed33:08

Thank you, Ms. Huff.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction33:10

We will now go to Dr. Amy Smith to be followed by Susan Anderson.

CommentAmy SmithProposed33:18

Welcome, Dr. Smith. When you're ready.

CommentSusan AndersonProposed33:21

Thank you, Chair Nelson. Can you hear me? Last week, well first I want to say the CDC itself is not a trustworthy organization with the presentation last week and Dr. De La Rosa talking about the misinformation mouse and cautioning us to only listen to the CDC for data and the California Department of Public Health and the County Health Department That's very concerning because there are huge, there's tremendous evidence of conflict of interest of all of these bodies due to the very powerful influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the policies that are allowed to be considered. That's why we're not hearing about the vitamin D status being checked and we're not hearing about monoclonal antibodies being proposed to be made available to people And ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine other kinds of treatments that have been very effective throughout the world.

And thank you for rolling your eyes but there is information and data and science has to look at everything and not just what makes profits for the largest corporations on the planet that also deal in drugs that kill people such as the opioid epidemic and have unfortunately criminal track records that are quite verifiable So this is very concerning that we have health officials that are only listening to certain sources that are constrained by policies that make profits for huge corporations. And that is not in the interest of health. I'm also very concerned that last week, Supervisor Williams said that one in 90 had died of this virus in our county and I'm hoping he can correct the record because if we want the public to trust official sources, we need to be very careful and honest with data and have humility if we misstate.

And the fact is that we are being encouraged to be terrified of something that seems to be manageable and not much different from the flu, and we're asked to give up all kinds of rights and we're subjecting children like my children are still exercising in masks. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:29

you Dr. Smith. That was your time.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction35:33

Chair Nelson and members of the board, we will now go to Susan Anderson to be followed by Claudia Henry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed35:43

Hi, can you hear me?

CommentAmy SmithProposed35:45

We can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed35:46

Okay, great. So Pfizer has redacted 30% of their document on Comirnaty so that the public can't see what's in it. That's kind of like Campbell Soup deciding that they don't want the public to know what's in MSG or any other artificials in the soup. It's bad for business, so they just leave it off the label so people don't know. Even food companies can't do this. So why does the FDA allow Pfizer to do this? What we're injecting into our bodies is far more concerning than a bowl of soup. So why do you think Pfizer's allowed to get away with this? The FDA is a captured agency, just like the CDC. The people who work there come from pharmaceutical companies and know they have a bright future with pharma if they play ball and serve the interests of pharma while at the agency.

It's called the revolving door and everyone in the industry knows about it. Former Commissioner Herbert Lay said this about the FDA in 1969. The FDA protects the big drug companies and is subsequently rewarded using the government's police powers. They attack those who threaten the drug companies. People think that the FDA is protecting them, it isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it is doing are as different as night and day. Pfizer redacted about 30% of the paper on the vaccine and what's in it. When you redact something, you have to provide a code which states the reason for the reduction to justify its secret. So Pfizer uses reduction code B4, which is used to avoid revealing quote information that would impair the application of a US weapon system.

There you have it. The vaccine is officially a US weapons system. A bioweapon Is against the world's population. What you do with this knowledge will define your legacy? Are you going to help us stop this train wreck or be a part of the greatest genocide in human history? And as everyone knows, the first oath in medicine is first to do no harm. Unfortunately, the public health department has done such great harm that people have been committing suicide. They've lost their jobs. They've lost their ability to go to school and to work. So if you're gonna violate your first oath of office, you shouldn't be in that position to be in that public health. We've made our whole community sicker and I really hope that the Board of Supervisors can step up to their job and come out for-

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6838:04

Thank you, Ms. Anderson. That is your time.

0:38 – 0:4512 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction38:12

We will now go to Claudia Henry to be followed by Dr. Hazen Witten.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6838:22

Go ahead, Miss Henry.

CommentMiss HenryProposed38:24

Hello I live in Goleta but I'm just a concerned citizen mother and private teacher. I suppose I care so much about education so i'm trying to get educated from the health department and every week I'm running into a stumbling block I'm hearing that the information keeps changing, but I'm not hearing the Santa Barbara Health Department really changing their information. Still, I'm not hearing about preventative treatments. I don't think my children are being educated about preventative treatment. I'm not hearing about what's actually in the vaccine. I'm not hearing about say like the physician's declaration, the global COVID summit that took place in Rome 11 000 doctors have signed that and I'm thinking should I listen to eleven thousand scientists or my local health department?

Well can we do both? Can we get just better information out there for us because We are being nudged by Santa Barbara County to go into mandated testing or mandated vaccination and we just need more information. And your influence is important, businesses are following it, schools are following it. Just don't think we have enough information so I'm asking for a pause, a pause on what you're doing and a re-examination of the science. This is an utmost priority.

Thank you for listening.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6839:53

Thank you.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction39:56

We will now go to Dr. Hsu Witten to be followed

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6839:59

by Aaron Chadwick. Dr. Witten, when you're ready. Can you hear me? Yes, Dr. Witten. Yeah,

CommentHsu WittenProposed40:21

thank you. Pfizer and the rest have no liability, and we have no recourse from injury from these jabs. In October 2019, two months before the first case of COVID, The Gates Foundation with the World Economic Forum held a pandemic simulation called Event 201 to plan for the world's coordinated response in case of an outbreak of let's say a coronavirus. They actually use coronavirus as the hypothetical outbreak pathogen On March 28th, 2019 nine months before the first case of COVID Moderna amended their patent application with the following statement quote because of a concern for re-emergence or a deliberate release of SARS coronavirus vaccine development was initiated. How would Moderna know to be concerned about a re-emergence or deliberate release of a coronavirus in March of 2019?

In 2017 Tony Fauci said that Before the end of Trump's first term, there would definitely be a global pandemic. Just look that up on YouTube. How are these people so psychic? In 2016 Peter Daszak, Director of EcoHealth Alliance who funneled money from NIH to the Wuhan lab reiterated that quote it's a long quote Until an infectious disease crisis is very real present and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding beyond the crisis we need to increase public understanding of the need for a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype We need to use that hype to our advantage. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process, end quote.

Please people wake up! If this were about health don't you think the crisis would have been over by now? COVID is now a huge industry it's profitable to keep it going. India had no COVID in 2019 because they used Ivermectin regularly.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:28

Thank You Dr. Witten that is your time

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction42:34

We will now go to Aaron Chadwick to be followed by Dan Pankratz.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed42:48

In my tiny circle of friends in our local community, I now know five people who have been severely injured by these experimental vaccines. I've been bringing the meals to them weekly and donating to their hospital and medical expenses because three of them can no longer function doing daily tasks like cooking a meal. In fact one lies in bed all day another is on a walker and the third is in a wheelchair A description in their words of the adverse events that they're experiencing are within an hour of getting the vaccine, severe neuropathy began which feels like jellyfish are stinging you over and over and last throughout the day and night with nerve pain so severe sleep feels impossible.

One of the five is my work colleague Susan who experienced myocarditis from her Pfizer shot and my neighbor Amanda who got myocarditis had her immune system plummet, lost vision in her right eye while getting shingles within an hour of her Pfizer shot. Dear board members would you be willing to join me in caring for these community members? Doss, Bob, Joan, Greg, Steve There are open dates on their meal train. I've sent them all to you in an email. Are you willing to sign up? Would you take a minute and listen to their stories? They're willing to talk to you! If you're not convinced that there are real risks to this vaccine, I invite you to come meet the injured. Where there is risk, there must be choice, and choices not being coerced at the expense of our livelihoods and our health.

Who exactly are these mandates protecting? Consider that as of September 1st, 2021 just 23 days ago the CDC updated their definitions of vaccination swapping out the prior verbiage that vaccines would produce immunity to now the new verbiage that says vaccines can only provide protection. It's in regards to the individual. On August 6th, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky on CNN acknowledged that the vaccine does not prevent transmission in fully vaccinated individuals so I ask you board members is it now your job to protect us from ourselves? It doesn't make any sense please look at my email that I sent you please I'll come and pick you all up I have a 15 passenger van you can come and meet my

CommentAmy SmithProposed44:52

friends this

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction44:54

is important We will now go to Dan Pankratz to be followed by Mickey Hamill.

0:45 – 0:5021 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6845:05

Hello,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed45:06

Dan Pancratz here. I appreciate you guys allowing me to speak to you guys today. I've listened to all the other public comments and there's coming all from one side of a side that does not agree with what is going on in the public right now. I believe that they're intelligent people on both sides of the argument of what's going on with COVID And I also believe that there's corruption on both sides of the argument of COVID. I urge you guys as the Board of Supervisors, the people that represent us as the community to hear what people are saying. There has not been one person has come today that has been agreeing with what's going on in our schools and in our community with regards to the mandates of COVID. I don't agree with them. I'm a father of four children, I've done business on this community and as a business person that looks at numbers the numbers don't make sense you guys are very intelligent people and i encourage you guys to continue to look at this thing from both sides of the argument realizing that there are intelligent people and corrupt people and the thing is i don't have to give you the numbers the numbers are right in front of us but you guys As a community, as leaders.

We need to do what's right for the people in our community, not what's right in the world we need to look at what's going on in our Santa Barbara County and orchid where I live, and what is important to the kids and the students and the parents and what the people are saying and the people are saying in this meeting that they don't agree with what's going on. I appreciate the role you guys have in our community and how important it is, and the tough decisions you guys make. So I encourage you guys to keep it up and thank you for allowing us to speak as a community. I appreciate you guys all. Thank you.

CommentAmy SmithProposed46:44

Thank you Dan.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction46:45

We will now go to Mickey Hamill to be followed by Cindy Sawyer who's our final speaker. My apologies, we did have an additional log in who had signed up timely and that we are going to Mickey Hamill to be followed by Greg Camel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed47:05

Hi. Good morning. Um, let

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction47:10

me see. I'm looking for my okay. Mickey, hold on just a moment. It sounds like you have two devices going if you can true enough?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed47:17

Yes.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction47:18

Thank you. If you can mute one device and just use your microphone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed47:22

Good.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction47:23

That would be great. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed47:25

Good morning everyone. Thank you for your time. We are here this morning to talk about the COVID and what we know about it. And If you think about it, I believe in my heart. It's actually incredibly the young who will if they avoid getting the virus will contribute to a herd immunity and it's been proven in other countries. We're just not looking at all the data and so children avoid the illness If enough people in the community have strong natural immunity, excuse me if the children avoiding the illness is not a badge of honor. It's if enough people in the community have strong natural immunity, the virus has no susceptible people according to my script and basically runs into an immunological brick wall. And we should read and learn how true herd immunity works because that's what's gonna contribute To getting over COVID, it's not the vaccine necessarily.

There are therapeutics there are Children are greater risk with the vaccine and the vaccine does nothing really to contribute to herd immunity because it doesn't prevent the transmission. And it's just that's not working, we can see the numbers. It's not working and if you know if we don't understand that I'm sorry so really there is no badge of honor as we're saying for taking the vaccine because all you're doing is really taking something that may be wrong for you And it's your choice, it's not anyone else's. It could be a poison to someone and it could weaken your own innate immune system especially if you've had COVID.

So it's really not a badge of honor to get

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6849:23

this experimental.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:29

Yes thank you Ms. Hamill

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction49:31

We will now go to Greg Hammel, to be followed by Cindy Sawyer.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.6849:36

Mr. Hammel when you're ready. Okay

CommentAmy SmithProposed49:45

I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed49:46

unmuted now. You guys have become a walk-in commercial to take pharma when it comes to flu and COVID vaccines in case you didn't have a chance Mr. Hamill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:01

Oh I'm sorry here we go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed50:02

you're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed50:03

on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:03

one

0:50 – 0:5916 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed50:11

Hi, I'm here to talk about the vaccine. And there were two flu shot studies sent to you by Dr. Witten. I'll summarize them. The first study on children found that those who had been vaccinated had a four times higher rate of respiratory infections in kids following nine months than unvaccinated kids. That's a big difference. The conclusion was that the shot hinders immunity leaving the vaccinated more susceptible to future infections not less If Dr. Levin can drum up a study showing kids actually benefit from the flu shot compared to the unvaccinated, I'd love to see it. Next there was a second study. It looked at 170 million cases of flu including 7.6 million deaths in seniors over 65 no difference was found in the unvaccinated and vaccinated.

And the largest study I've ever heard of is going on right now COVID shots, half the world has been injected with mRNA vaccine that has never been used in humans and has no long-term safety study. And the other thing I'd like to Note is that typical of Marxists and progressives, they state that we are presenting misinformation when the Marxist progressives are the ones presenting misinformation. This is typical what they do. The Marxist progressives accuse you of doing what they're doing and that's what's happening right now As we are presenting facts, data and study. And I have seen nothing zero from your board doctor so your marks this ploys these have been tried before and you keep doing them. We're aware good morning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:05

Good morning miss Mister Hamlin thank you.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction52:08

We will now go to Cindy Sawyer to be followed by a brand mayor who is our final speaker

CommentAmy SmithProposed52:17

Sarah, when you're ready.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed52:19

Hi good morning. I'm going to pick up where Dr. Witton was talking about India and vaccines they didn't have a COVID problem until they started their vaccinations because they were taking the ivermectin and then they had a big outbreak after their vaccine was rolled out it went back to ivermectin and now they're off the news because they don't have a problem anymore Israel The most vaccinated country in the world, and they have the second highest COVID rates. So that's proof there that the vaccines are not effective.

Laser study shows that the Pfizer vaccine isn't even 50% effective after five months. If you keep doing boosters every six months, you're going to ruin our immune systems. The antibody effect will diminish with each booster And so the answer is early treatment. Please consider what's truly good for the people instead of buying into these vaccines, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:23

Thank you Miss Sauer.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction53:25

And we will now go to Faye Brandmeier who is our final speaker on this item.

CommentAmy SmithProposed53:33

Miss Brandmeir when you're ready

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed53:35

can you hear me?

CommentAmy SmithProposed53:36

We can.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed53:37

Great, thank you. So researchers have looked at the vaccines under a microscope and said they've never seen anything like this. There's sharp metallic fragments and things that move under the microscope like a parasite. They've documented large amounts of graphene oxide and extremely strong compound used in AI Artificial intelligence that is toxic to humans and has no business being in the body, and no business being in a vaccine. Dr. Hoffa, a cardiologist ran a lab test called a D-Dimer test on 100 of his patients after they received the vaccines. Anybody can do this. He's seen positive D-dimer labs in 62% of the people vaccinated. Basically when a person is injected they receive 40 trillion Spike proteins which then line the capillaries and make them rough, which makes it very difficult for the blood cells to move through it.

The immune system sees this as an injured blood vessel and initiates clotting factors and the capillary is shut down. For God's sakes please consider very strongly about We're protecting children from these vaccines. I know we're at the schools with vaccine clinics, at the middle schools. According to Dr. Hoffa this leads to pulmonary hypertension and death within three years and we're seeing this even in young people already especially young males This is why animal testing and long-term studies are important. There are no animal tests done on these vaccines, and it's a violation of federal law to mandate a vaccine under the EUA. The only approved vaccine is not available in our country yet. And so please from the bottom of my heart you know that the misinformation you're talking about we have to look all around now.

It's not We're doing our research here. You guys have no information each week, there's no new information. It's the same stuff. There are hundreds of thousands of doctors and lawsuits.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:47

Thank you Ms. Brown Mayor that is your time.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction55:51

And that concludes public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:54

All right back to the board.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction55:56

Supervisor Hart? Well I appreciate the passion that the public commenters have brought to this subject but it is very important Give Dr. Doberioso an opportunity to respond to some of the comments. It is remarkable how consistent the comments are, we have letters here that echoed the same talking points that the speakers have all interwoven into their remarks that sound spontaneous it appears as though you know somebody has organized folks to have a particular agenda Just one thing that I was curious about when one of the speakers was talking about India and they mentioned, you know, the experience there. I googled India and COVID and the very first story is an article from Reuters that the headline says, India recommends homegrown COVID-19 vaccine for kids age two and above.

So it doesn't take a ton of research to look You know, at some of the comments that folks are making to refute the allegations. But it is important for us to have factual information in a public forum like this. So if Dr. Duranosa would just take a moment to respond maybe to the allegation that the COVID vaccine injures children or that flu shots injure children, I think it'd be very important for parents to understand the truth.

Dr. Duranosa?

CommentGeneral Public CommentProposed57:22

Yes, Supervisor Hart through the chair. I am dismayed by what I've heard this morning and You know, I think that I appreciate the time and the effort each of these speakers come forth as parent. You know their concern. I do believe that you can make a false narrative based on some truths and link them together to make a convincing story. I am not aware of any, I'm not aware of the harm that the speaker spoke of, the community members that she shared relating to the meal trains. I'm not aware of the cases of children being harmed in our community.

So those are facts that are presented as facts but we are not aware And just so you know that when we do have a severe side effect, a severe side reaction or anything of that our healthcare community is fairly open and transparent with sharing with the public department. Hey I saw a patient today And this is what happened or anything similar, and we have not that it's not brought been brought to our attention.

So I can say that as a public health official, I do rely on CDC. I do rely on CDPH because those are The studies, the policies based on the studies have been peer reviewed by mainstream scientists and experts and physicians. And as a parent I would be concerned too if I read any of those sites that the speaker spoke of but They, to the best of my knowledge, those statistics, those narratives have not been vetted at least by our professional and experts.

0:59 – 1:045 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed59:44

Thank you Dr. Del Rosso, thank you Supervisor Hart. Any other questions from the board or comments? Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed59:52

Well, I wanted to remind folks. I mean, I think it's always good to look at public policy from the perspective of what if you have it wrong? And and I would balance the claims of the speakers with just the numbers and the experience here in Santa Barbara County, especially since one of them continues to question than the numbers. We have had 43,080 positive cases and 509 deaths which actually means it's more frequent to die than 1 in 90 as I rounded the estimate. It means one in 85 positive cases has ended in a death And of course, I know many of them will go well. A lot of those are have comorbidities but those deaths don't include people who have deteriorated from some other illness post COVID infection related to it like a heart condition or a respiratory condition that was exacerbated by COVID infection.

So people are getting sick and have gotten sick, and the danger is still real. And so I think vigilance is still in order.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:23

Thank you Supervisor Williams. And just to briefly go back to the question I had earlier about the CDC criteria as far as the recommendation especially Response to masks. I know I talked to our assistant CEO this morning and hope that a public health is agreeable about maybe tying now that we don't have a state blueprint for, you know, opening back up maybe we tied it to CDC on our website. I think that would be helpful for people to see where we're at as far as the CDC standards and we can true up those numbers so that we can see as a community how we're approaching this and hopefully That we can get to a place where we can at least begin to remove the masks and other mandates that are in place surrounding the pandemic.

And I just wanted to speak a little bit to the speakers, because I know that sometimes it's frustrating to call in and then not get a lot of reaction from the board or one way or the other. That you're not hearing certain things and very passionate opinions. I really appreciate Dan Pankratz talking about that there's good people on both sides of this issue that might have different opinions.

You know, I think a lot of us in Dr. Dover knows so hit it on it that we can create false narratives for ourselves but also some of us suffer from confirmation bias. We read something that already aligns with what we believe and so we tend to agree with that information or reject other information And that's why my approach on the pandemic has all along been about trying to respect each other's freedoms and our ability to make decisions for ourselves. I think the vaccine has been a tool where people, most people, most people that are vulnerable have the ability to protect themselves if they wish.

To me, the numbers are very clear that if you're vaccinated, you're less likely to be hospitalized or die with a case of COVID. That said, you know that's a choice that we all make our risk assessments. If you're afraid about what the long-term effects are of COVID I understand that that is your decision and I'm one of those advocates who says that's the decision you should make for yourself. I know there's others that say if you are likely to have spread more because you have a positive case because you're unvaccinated that impacts others that may not be able to get the vaccine or young kids that might have lasting effects and I understand that And it is a careful balance.

It's also a careful balance on what's going on with our healthcare system, and are we overtaxing that? I don't think we should get to a point where we can't have somebody be served in our ERs because our hospital is overwhelmed with COVID cases. So again, to me, it's a balance. It's a high bar for mandates, and sometimes I think we've met that, and other times I think we've jumped to them too quickly But I appreciate the conversation and the ability to have this forum, to have those discussions.

So with that we need to approve item A4.

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction1:04:33

So moved.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:04:34

Second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 moved. Second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye Supervisor Hart? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye. And Chair Nelson? Aye

1:04 – 1:0718 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:04:50

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:04:51

OK, before we leave the administrative agenda I believe there's actually a request on A15 to continue that item and I think we hastily approved it without heeding that request and my vice chair, Supervisor Hartman picked up on that for me and so can we do a do-over on that piece? So can you walk me through what I need to do here?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:05:14

Yes, chair Nelson and members of the board if we could just return to administrative item number 15 we can take an additional action on that item. This is an item from public works and community services to consider recommendations regarding an authorizing resolution and master standard agreement MSA between the Santa Barbara County in the state of California housing And community development department community development block grant disaster relief funds related to the 2017 Thomas fire and this is in the first district. And my apologies, but we did receive a request to continue this item from the public works department on October 7th, and they are requesting to continue this item from October 12th.

From our meeting today on October 12th to November 2nd so that the state has time to review the proposed resolution. And if we could just get an action to continue a motion to continue this to the November 2nd meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:11

Okay, before we do that, part of the motion to rescind the previous approval earlier or how does that move forward? Just point of clarity.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:06:21

Mister chair members of the board. You can do that for so that the record is clear, the way since it's a noticed item we can take a second action to resend the first. So if you'd like it to make it really good on the record just have a motion to rescind the previous action and then take a new motion to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:38

continue

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:06:39

815.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:39

Okay, can I one of my colleagues make that motion?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.821:06:42

So I would move that we rescind

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:48

Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Second by Supervisor Hart. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move that we rescind Thank you, Supervisor Hartman. Second by Supervisor Hart. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavinino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye Supervisor Hart? Aye Supervisor Hartman? Aye And Chair Nelson? Aye
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:02

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:03

Okay thank you very much

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:06

And turn off the members of the board if we can get a third motion to continue the item to November 2nd. I think that was that was hard. I'm sorry, I missed that. I just heard the rescind part.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:17

Yes,

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:18

thank you. I think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:18

we included that in emotion.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:19

Great. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:20

All right. Thank you very much. And with that, this concludes our administrative agenda and won't be moving on to general public comment. Now it's time for the public to speak on items that are not on our agenda today. Madam Clerk, are there any requests to speak on general public comment?

1:07 – 1:1214 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:38

Chair Nelson and members of the board yes we have two requests to speak on general public comment this morning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:43

All

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:07:44

right and we will first go to Dr Amy Smith to be followed by Maria Kessler.

CommentAmy SmithProposed1:07:49

All right Dr Smith welcome back.

CommentSusan AndersonProposed1:07:55

Thank you Chair Nelson I am I'm very concerned about the issue of governance and our rights being jeopardized and taken away. Our personal choices, our privacy, our medical privacy that's being broadcast on armbands at the city college whether you are fully vaccinated and where is the supervision of the health department? That's what I'm very concerned about having independent supervision.

Supervisor Williams is off by a factor of 10, that it's like 1 in 900 deaths not one in 90. And I would like him to check that out or maybe the health department could confirm if it's 1% deaths by COVID or 0.1% in our county. These are very different scenarios. One would be a much higher level of concern, I would think. So getting that right is very important and You guys, unfortunately as the supervisors are thrust into this position of having to supervise people who have expertise that you don't but who may be getting information from biased sources that have a narrative. That is a very profitable narrative That is changing our society, all kinds of things in our society making us do insane things like fire very capable experienced fire workers when we live under a threat of brush fires and are facing one right now that's affecting our economy with the-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:29

Dr. Smith let me just interrupt you for a second can we pause for time? I do appreciate you being creative and weaving in some other issues that are potentially not COVID related but let's try to keep it to items on the agenda and stay away from I just wanted to make sure that we have a appropriate amount of time available to comment on the COVID item. We will continue, and that's my commitment as the board chair, to have that opportunity at every meeting so that you don't necessarily need to do that in public comment but if you do have other items that you'd like to bring up that are non-COVID related, we are all ears. So I just wanted to go over that with you and also make sure if there's any other public commenters Is to probably is to keep them items specifically.

The things that are not on our agenda today and we did have an item on covid in a four so doctor Smith please proceed.

CommentSusan AndersonProposed1:10:26

With all due respect covid is affecting every single aspect of our county governance of our economy, our schools, our children's lives are their social experience All manner of things. And it's not just the update from the health department, it's also what is the role of the supervisors to make sure that they're able to get information to be good supervisors? When you're a boss, you have to know what you're doing to know whether your employees are doing the right thing and have the best information and the best resources to make the best decisions. And so how are we going to be able to support the best public health awareness from, About this issue and any other issue, frankly.

If if the information is being very biased and captured by very powerful industries and you know the fact that we have other things to worry about in our county like fires. That is affected by a mandate that's going to be driving people out there's a mandate That is causing pilots to call in sick and canceling thousands of flights. Will shipping be affected of food, all kinds of things? So this is a much deeper problem than just the update on tracking a disease which is how I identify that item but this is about the governance and taking away people's rights, taking away people's privacy, suspending all of our rights for an emergency that isn't proven to be true. And science is something that you can question. Science is something that people The field, they earn a reputation by coming back over and over with credible information.

And good thoughts and good evidence to back

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:12:07

it up Smith that is your time.

CommentSusan AndersonProposed1:12:10

We will now go to Maria.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:12:11

Before we go to Maria Kessner, Dr. Smith I'd like to invite you to call me in my office. I want to just talk to you about trying to keep the flow of the meeting going and what I'm hoping to do. I want to make sure you have a voice and have that opportunity. I do not want to silence you. That is not my intention but I do want to keep order in a meeting that I'm tasked with running so please call my office at 805-346 8407 and please make an appointment. I lost this which further so

moving on to the next public commenter.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:12:42

Chair Nelson and members of the board, we had an additional request to speak, so we will go to Maria Kessner to be followed by Joshua Medrano who is our final speaker?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:12:50

Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and close general public comment this time, so that will be the final two speakers.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:12:55

Maria Kessler

1:13 – 1:1812 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:13:00

Good morning Board of Supervisors can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:13:04

Can you hear me, we can discuss please

CommentAmy SmithProposed1:13:06

proceed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:13:07

So I would like to address Dr Reno's public records request and I have to deviate a little bit I did want to address Mr Greg Hart really quickly does Mr Greg hard no supervisor know that Google is I'm going to be talking about engaging in heavy duty censorship and is part of the military industrial complex. So but anyway, that public records request putting a public records request and with the county to request that messy data as Dr Rayon also called it last week.

I did not get any response from the county. I did get a timely response, but I got no records. But the California Government Code section 6253A requires you to assist me in identifying the records and information that are responsive to my request Or to the purpose of my request, describe the information technology and fiscal location in which the records exist. And three provide me with suggestions for overcoming any practical basis for denying access to the records or information I'm asking for.

So that was one point I wanted to make number two we have a fundamental right under the California Constitution To these public records request article one section three goes over those rights and then I also wanted to point out. If you are denying us any records, then we can take as the public has a right to legal action. If no satisfying answer is coming from our California Public Records request like the court shall award court costs and reasonable attorney fees to the requester should the requester prevail in litigation filed pursuant to this section, the cost of fee shall be paid by the public agency or which the public official is a member or employee and shall they become a personal liability and public official. I would like to add to this panel, I am a very, I'm a fact finder with the track record and a legal track record with three legal settlements in special education in this town.

I have dealt extensively with bureaucracy and I am just suggesting to the public keep going at it because if the facts are on your side eventually the truth will come out and prevail Following the processes that are in place, legal processes, medical processes. And this is basically to address the condescending comments of Supervisor Greg Hart towards the public and also the response to Dr. Reynoso who is saying that she has followed all the processes or her department or the county clerk department has followed all the processes to provide us with a response, but nobody so far that I know has

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:16:06

received any documents from the County Clerk Office. Thank you Ms. Kessner, that is your time.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:16:12

And we will now go to our final speaker, Joshua Medrano.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:16:18

Mr. Medrano when you're ready?

GuestJoshua MedranoTreasurerProposedself-stated1:16:23

Thank you very much can everybody hear me fine?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:16:25

We can please proceed.

GuestJoshua MedranoTreasurerProposedself-stated1:16:26

Well, very good. Thank you. My name is Joshua Medrano and I am the Executive Secretary and Treasurer of the Tri-Counties Building and Construction Trades Council of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties representing well over 14,000 hardworking men and women of organized labor. And I am here today to continue to try to educate the public about what community workforce agreements are and to thank this board for the opportunity to be able to address everybody in the public today as just friendly PR.

As a reminder, the goal of CWA is identification retention and training of skilled labor and employment of local area residents It's the encouragement of local and small businesses to participate and benefit from projects. It's the establishment of procedures to ensure project cooperation or resolving any disputes among all parties to agreement. Provisions are simple. It ensures non-discrimination in referral, employment and contracting. It ensures employment of local area residents. Ensures the ability of contractors to utilize core employees of their choosing. Utilizes helmets to hard hats to prioritize outreach and employment at veterans. Ensures that no employee covered by the agreement shall be required to join any union as a condition of being employed.

Ensures that workers are classified It is very simple. The CWA, the Community Workforce Agreement is for the public. This board as well as the county to continue to move forward with the progression of a CWA. The building trades are here to help and answer any questions that we can, and look forward to our continued partnership. Have a great day.

not transcribed≈23s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:18:29

Thank you Mr Madonna, you have great day as well. And I believe that concludes public comment. All right, that brings us to our departmental agenda.

The next item is departmental item number one. Madam Clerk will you please read that item into the record?

1:18 – 1:305 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:18:52

Chair Nelson and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding COVID-19 health and human services recovery and resiliency strategies.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:19:11

Good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:19:11

morning Chair Nelson, members of the board. Can everyone hear me okay?

CommentAmy SmithProposed1:19:15

We can.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:19:16

Thank you. Good morning again this item is on your agenda for a presentation of the COVID-19 Health and Human Services Recovery and Resiliency Strategies. These strategies are designed to support and provide structure to ongoing and recommended recovery activities to specifically address the impacts of COVID- 19 On the vulnerable, under resourced and underserved within the county. Many of these individuals are directly served by our health and human services departments.

The board is not being asked to make funding decisions today staff will bring a discussion of funding allocations and qualified uses of the American Rescue Plan Act funding on October 19 However, the board may wish to provide some direction regarding the recommended strategies presented to you today. Before I jump into the rest of our presentation today, I do want to acknowledge the work of your Health and Human Services department heads as well as their management teams in the collaborative development of all of the strategies that you'll be seeing today.

Specifically Daniel Nielsen, Pamela Fisher, Wendy Sims Moten, Joanie Maiden George Chapchin, Wanda Renoso and our Director of the Office of Emergency Management Kelly Hubbard who worked collaboratively with the team to develop the disaster resiliency strategies. Again thank you to all of them for their work in the development of the strategies and then of course ultimately in the implementation of the strategies let's go ahead and go to the next slide.

In regards to an outline of today's presentation, I'll be reviewing some of the current conditions. The COVID-19 impacts at a national level, as well as some of the local impacts identified by the department heads. We'll also discuss the overall guiding principles that led to the development of the strategies, some of our desired outcomes and then of course the larger term approach to the actual recovery focus areas and the strategies contained within. And then we'll talk about next steps in terms of implementation Let's go to the next slide.

In terms of the current condition, as you've heard many times over the course of the last 19 months via the presentations from public health and others, communities of color have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 both physically and economically. In addition, lower paying industries like tourism, hospitality, recreation, agriculture whose average earnings are typically below 45,000 have experienced a drop of employment ranging anywhere between 15 and 40%.

Women who account for about 80% of the total population who exited the workforce during COVID-19. And that 80% exited primarily due to childcare concerns. In addition, we saw an increase in many of the services provided through our county departments. Specifically request for CalFresh assistance increased by 3%, Medi-Cal claims increased by 17%. And we saw a stark increase to our behavioral wellness access line primarily in requests for substance abuse services and our overdose rates continue to rise.

On the federal, state and local level there was some relief offered certainly. Business loans and grants were provided here in our county about 8100 businesses received the Paycheck Protection Program assistance. These businesses reported employing almost 91,000 workers or about 43% of our total workforce in the county again hospitality tourism recreation and agriculture primarily utilize this program.

There were also rental assistance programs provided over the last many months and business assistance from both the state and federal and local government, which I'll highlight in just a minute. And of course our safety net programs continued and unemployment benefits were expanded both through the federal and state government. There is some good news our economy is in fact recovering we had a high of unemployment rate in April of 2020 at 14%.

Most recently, we dropped to an unemployment rate of about 5.8% in July and then in August, 5.5%. And we soon anticipate bringing back to our pre-pandemic unemployment rate very shortly. You have another item on your agenda today that will be presented by Ray McDonald, and he'll also be discussing some of this data. Let's go ahead and go the next slide. In terms of the recovery actions to date, the board took immediate actions to address COVID-19 and their impacts as well set a sound foundation for recovery and assist our community members. Specifically in June, the board reviewed allocated $7 million to Isla Vista Homeless Housing as a result of an increase in our unsheltered population and encampments.

Again, regarding the encampment strategy, the board very recently allocated funding for capital as well as ongoing services so that community services could begin to more actively address our growing encampment issue. And also you dedicated $1.5 million over three years to behavioral wellness to conduct a community-wide assessment of behavioral health and substance abuse needs and I'll speak in just a moment to some of the activities that are occurring there.

In non-ARPA recovery efforts, again staff undertook the Isla Vista pallet homes within Isla Vista to address the unsheltered. And since then those shelters have been moved to the Lompoc area to continue services. Project Roomkey has been in place for many months serving as of today 198 individuals with 88 placed in permanent supportive housing And 31 individuals remaining housed within Project Roomkey currently.

Local business assistance grants were offered via the CDBG funding allocation and local rental assistance programs continued throughout the county. Let's go to the next slide. In addition to those efforts, while you will not see specific public health recovery strategies listed today I did want to note their effort. As they have been engaged in the public health response efforts throughout in addition to addressing infrastructure and other dedicated funding. So foundational to the work by public health to outreach and engage with the underserved and under-resourced population, they've been addressing equity and inclusion across all facets of their outreach and response.

As part of their ongoing recovery efforts as well, they are continuing to address disparities in health incomes, eliminate service barriers, and address service and information gaps in order to continue their ongoing response. Let's go to the next slide. In terms of strategy development and how we began the work in identifying the strategies presented to you today, we undertook several different approaches. First, we took a look at the national trends and will be presenting those two in just a moment. Each of the departments also reviewed the local data, local trends, and the various events occurring within each of the programs that they provide.

We then convene to discuss direct and secondary impacts and challenges associated with COVID-19, and following service delivery. We then developed six recovery focus areas and develop the primary impact in future strategies that you will see later in the presentation. Next slide. In terms of the nationally identified impacts and challenges, I'm sure this will look very familiar to many. Of course there were the physical impacts, obviously the morbidity, mortality and indirect health impacts surrounding COVID-19, the socioeconomic factors, loss of wages, unemployment, impacts to education, housing and basic living needs.

Psychosocial, many had social isolation for the first time. Increased stress, behavioral health needs, increase in substance abuse, family and domestic violence. And then there were institutional and structural impacts as well. Impacts to the health systems across the nation, safety net strain, racism and xenophobia, as well as health and social inequities, as I mentioned earlier.

Let's go to the next slide. I hope you can see this on your screens, I know it's fairly small print. This is what the Health and Human Services Department specifically identified in terms of impact seen throughout our programs and out and throughout our community. We identified a number of different areas so that we could craft strategies specific to address these impacts.

Obviously an area of children, loss of social connections that are often developed within the schools. Marginalized and underserved and under resourced communities as I mentioned before were more severely impacted as a result of the pandemic. We saw incidences of family violence with greater risk of family violence due to isolation and homes. We also saw behavior health and social connections. Reports of loneliness, twice as many adults reported feelings of anxiety and nervousness. We also saw loss of community connections.

Women we saw as well were being exited from the workforce primarily they were the primary providers for childcare as I mentioned previously. In the area of homelessness, obviously we saw increased encampments and increased unsheltered homelessness throughout our system. Another area was digital inclusion. There were a lack of resources available to those to immediately access the Internet, to participate in services and gather information.

Disproportionately impacted adult learners and those who depend on public facilities to access the Internet and online information for services found it very difficult to access a number of services not only those provided by the county but through other service providers. The elderly or people over 65 who had chronic medical conditions were of course impacted tremendously by COVID-19 and they also reported high instances of isolation, loneliness.

1:30 – 1:415 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:30:44

Let's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:30:44

go ahead and go to the next slide. So our goals as we move forward is to So we set forward a number of desired outcomes for the plan, and those are listed here. The first was to address the most significant primary and secondary impacts of COVID-19. The next was to integrate whole community practices to identify capacities and gaps in achieving equitable recovery and resiliency. And when we say whole community what we mean is by actually reaching out to our community and understanding their needs Surveying them to understand and to ensure that we're incorporating their needs into the planning.

We also built recovery teams to drive recovery strategies and monitor trends, you'll see in our implementation that we have a department head assigned to each of our strategies so that they can continue to resource and drive strategies collectively We also wanted to ensure that one of our outcomes was the ability to drive innovative, rapid and inclusive recovery activities which is why we're structuring the plan in the way we have.

Our overall goal of course is to improve equity and inclusion, livability wellness and economic vitality with the outcomes that I've also listed here. Let's go to the next slide. In developing our strategies, we also wanted to ensure that we were using the values that we have crafted as part of our Renew 2022 effort. Equity and providing needed support to individuals so there is better access to high quality services and resources. We wanted to ensure inclusion and a focus on initiatives that make Santa Barbara County a place where all can recover and thrive regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, age We wanted to ensure that we were looking at innovation and harness the advancement and capitalize on Renew 2022, and what we have all learned in experiencing COVID-19.

And lastly, we added sustainability. We wanted to seize the opportunity to address the goals that we've outlined in Renew 2022 modernize county services and strategically deploy resources efficiently and responsibly. Again, to be consistent with our organizational values. Next slide. This is our roadmap. It kind of tells you where we've been and where we're going. Obviously, we started in phase one which was to protect the health and safety of our community through those initial robust public health response activities. And we have listed a number of the actual activities here.

We then moved into phase two, which I referenced was really establishing the foundation for recovery through our vaccinations, rental assistance, local and state programs Our outdoor dining, which I didn't comment on earlier but was critically important to our business recovery. And then of course getting all of our services online and following the Beyond the Blueprint strategies.

Obviously phase one and phase two continue and now we're coming forward with what we're calling phase three, Recovery in a Resilient State, which is the health and human services recovery strategies to improve equity inclusion livability Next slide. Our recovery focus areas. As I noted, we have developed six recovery focus areas and there are number of strategies contained within them.

However, rather than developing specific department initiatives, this framework identifies the six recovery focus areas with related strategies and ultimately integrates programs and services among departments. Addressing the recovery focus areas will require more collaboration across departmental initiatives As I noted previously, a department head is designated as recovery focus area lead to ensure that these strategies are in fact executed and completed.

Our office is reviewing the entire plan and ensuring overall implementation. The COVID-19 recovery focus areas were identified to assure that current and future services will not only support all individuals throughout the current crisis, but will lift the marginalized and underserved above the pre-COVID-19 experience. And ensuring that all are prepared to quickly overcome challenges and also have equitable access to services and build opportunities to thrive within our community.

As noted, the recovery focus areas are behavioral health Economic Development and Revitalization, Disaster Resiliency, Housing and Homelessness, Organization and Technology, and Community Health and Well-Being.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:36:00

Next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:36:02

slide. The first recovery focus area is Behavioral Health. Here, our goal is to guide anyone who needs mental health support and substance abuse treatment to know where to find assistance and how to access report. Our primary impact strategies for year one are to assess community need and establish appropriate service strategies. And secondly, to establish board and care beds for underserved and medically fragile seniors.

Our first strategy has already been addressed Thank you very much to the board for your allocation of $1.5 million over three years in ARPA funds several months ago because of that early allocation, our Behavioral Wellness Department being led by both Pam Fisher and supported by Suzanne Grimacy have initiated the community assessment. To date we've received almost 4500 responses to this survey 35 agencies have been included and partnered with as a result of the outreach.

We've utilized 18 promotoras to ensure that the survey was distributed in Spanish and Mixteco. So that survey actually closed on September 30th, and the various stakeholders in behavioral wellness are now in the process of reviewing those assessments to determine next steps in development of services to address the needs identified. The next area, established board and care.

We're specifically looking at some strategies to establish a 15 bed facility to specifically address the medically fragile and underserved mentally ill within the community. This was actually reported to the board at the discussion of the capital facilities needs with behavioral wellness The Director of Behavioral Wellness will actually be leading this strategy as well. Let's go to the next slide for more specifics.

As noted here, we have our strategies. The first, the community-wide assessment of services, as I indicated, the 1.5 million, as part of this was already addressed in year one and we'll be assessing the needs to determine what will be needed in terms of future services along with our partners. The Board and Care Facility for Medically Fragile Seniors is a $700,000 one-time investment in rehabilitation. And then we will be looking forward in years two and three and future years for sustained service funding. We believe that this will be covered the ongoing services will be funded not only through the CalAIM program but through MediCal and Social Security. So we do not believe there to be ongoing costs in year two and three to the general fund In future years will be continuing to explore school connections for services and expanding collaborative grants with our school districts.

The 900,000 noted here is to expand clinical services to further support the schools. And the fourth strategy is an expansion of our substance abuse assessment services with $100,000 in years two and three to conduct an additional assessment. Next slide. The next area is community health and well being in this area. Our goal is to ensure that underserved and marginalized within our communities have access to county health and human services.

The first strategy that we're suggesting is assessing food security needs with an emphasis on senior nutrition. This area, based on our community dashboard continues to be a very volatile area with food insecurity needs still spiking at different components of the pandemic. Our second strategy is to conduct a CalAIM readiness assessment to ensure that we can fully roll out a whole person care system required via CalAIM, and this also anticipates an IT plan.

The next strategy is to establish a position to coordinate health and human services equity inclusion throughout all the departments. We envision creating an Health and Human Services Equity Hub To serve as a clearinghouse for all of the efforts among the various departments, not only in Health and Human Services but throughout the county. We want to expand outreach to underserved communities through the Promotaurus Program We've been using Promotaurus throughout our response to COVID-19, and we want to continue that work and institutionalize it within the organization. This strategy would allow that to occur.

And we want to do a broad survey of families to assess child care needs and determine from there additional strategies moving forward. Our lead in this area will be our Director of Social Services.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:41:17

Let's go to the next slide. Next slide.

1:41 – 1:509 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:41:28

I think we went back up one more, there we go. Thank you very much. OK, so our first area the assessment of the senior nutrition programs is about $150,000 for the initial assessment and then for the future years in case there are needs identified, we are proactively indicating a need of about $450,000 in case we have to expand that program. Cal AIM and Information Technology Assessment, $400,000 one time in year one for the actual assessment.

In years two and three you'll see $800,000 within that column. That is specifically for case managers and navigators to allow people to work within the various regions of the counties I should say, to help navigate people throughout the system so there is a no wrong door to any of the health and human services programs The next area, as I already mentioned is the Health and Human Services Equity Inclusion Coordinator position.

In year one there's $100,000 knowing that we're partway through this fiscal year and then in future years we have the funding for the position to continue. We also have the outreach services, the $50,000 to help fund our promotoras going forward for the remainder of this year and then ongoing funding in years two and three And then in area five, our child care survey of families within our community. We do have year one listed at $100,000 but we have found funding available through the state allocation through the State Department of Education to first five and we will be, we have identified this funding so we are not going to be requesting that in a subsequent board meeting. Let's go to the next area.

The next area is economic revitalization and employment. And again, you'll be hearing from Mr McDonald a bit later today with much more detail in this area. So our goal here is to explore innovative economic opportunities and regional partnerships to advance economic vitality when the primary Strategies listed at the development of a comprehensive economic development strategy, which you had a report on several weeks ago. We've included the cost of that study within this report so that we are linking everything together. The next two strategies, the development of a strategy for use of anticipated federal and state funding for workforce development as well as providing technical assistance to our local community is also included again these will also Be leveraging the actual says report once that is completed.

The assistant CEO as well as the Director of Social Services will be leading this effort. Let's go to the next slide.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:44:33

One more click. We could go to a fiscal slide, that'd be great.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:44:40

Terry, just so you know my apologies. There is a slight delay on our end so we do see that here in the room.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:44:47

OK great

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:44:47

thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:44:48

you Jacqueline I appreciate that. OK, the first area at the comprehensive economic development strategy again that was reported to the board previously there's a one time cost of 150,000 and listed here. That is our contribution or the county's contribution to the total cost The next two areas, the strategy for anticipated state and federal funding of our workforce as well as the technical assistance I described.

That is listed here at $1.1 million. We are not requesting that funding via ARPA. We believe that there is grant funding that will be available through the State Workforce Fund and the Workforce Investment Board grants to fund these activities. And again, Mr. McDonald can speak to these a bit later. Let's go to the next slide. Thank you. The next area is organization and technology. Our goal here is to ensure equitable access to technology and enhance digital literacy and inclusion, to maximize utilization of county services and programs as well as access to information.

Our goal again is to also facilitate social inclusion of unrepresented segments of the population By advancing the use of technology in all of our communities. You can see here are three primary impact strategies conducting a digital equity and literacy needs assessment and develop strategies to address Develop a long term strategic plan for broadband deployment, which again your board did hear report on previously And number three, to identify key data metrics and data integration across HHS departments. Here we envision developing another data dashboard to expand on what we already have represented within our public health dashboard that we've used throughout the pandemic. Last, our future year strategies is to maximize technology extend Wi-Fi And establish key hubs in the community or county facilities and underserved and under-resourced areas with community partners, again to facilitate access to those that do not have immediate access to broadband.

Our lead in this area will be our Director of Child Support Services. So the next slide. Here we go itemizing each of the strategies, the digital equipment and literacy assessment. We anticipate approximately $100,000 as a one time investment in the first year following up in years two and three depending on what is found within the assessment, the ability to invest in equipment As well as training for individuals that may be identified so that they have their needs are met Number two, the long-term strategic plan for the broadband deployment. Again this was discussed at the board meeting of 921 and that the funding of $200,000 as a one time investment is included here. Number three which is the dashboard of health and human services identifying key data metrics that will evolve as part of our strategies is approximately $110,000 dollars as a one time investment And 200,000 ongoing until we can be fully trained in how to keep up the dashboard.

We may need some consultant help moving forward for at least two years. We also want to maximize the technology to extend Wi-Fi and we're still going to be looking at that investment as part of the broadband deployment strategy. Next The last area is one that has also been before the board, so this will look very familiar to all. Our goals here are to establish interim and long-term solutions for housing relief and sustainability, address keeping people housed, emergency housing, farmworker housing, and strategies to address encampments ensuring health and safety.

We have a series of recovery strategies. The first is to create 215 new permanent supportive housing options, we are doing that through the use of vouchers and I'll describe the financial components of these in the next slide. Our second is to create an encampment strategy which your board has had a report on and provided funding to date. We plan to increase temporary sheltering capacity by 100 beds Expand the continuum of housing options consistent with phase two community action strategy.

Ensure housing supports, working with tenants, homeowners and lenders. Maximize use of our multidisciplinary teams in the field and expand our outreach engagement to caseworkers. Our lead in this area is our Director of Community Services.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:49:50

Let's go to the next slide. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:50:06

going to go ahead and move through that as the slide is changing. So, the first is to create the 215 Permanent Supportive Housing Grants. We do have funding allocated for year one through some specialty state and federal funding. We are also examining future funding for these, for the vouchers through state and federal money, as well as looking at the state-specific home funding for ARPA.

And Jacqueline has that slide moved on my end it has not.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:50:42

Could you hold on one moment, Terry we are, it's showing in the room but it's not shining on CSB TV could one second.

1:50 – 1:574 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction1:50:53

Yeah Terry, my apologies. I believe there is a an error in our network or slow network this morning we are seeing it in the room and that is what is being broadcast to the board members here but I'm just confirming with CSP TV that it's the same thing that's being broadcast at home as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:51:13

There we go OK thank you. I'll continue to move through. Alright, the next area is implement the encampment strategy The board did allocate on August 31 a first year of funding of $645,000. In Year 2 and 3 in order to continue the strategy adopted we do show an ongoing need of $1.2 million for Year 2 & 3. We are continuing to look at ongoing funding sources there as well both state and federal grants.

Number three Is increasing temporary sheltering shelter capacity with the hundred beds that we've spoken to the board about in the past. This 1.2 million and your one is a one time investment, this is the funding to address water and sanitation at the bridge house site regarding the 20 shelters that were recently moved from Isla Vista to the long poke facility.

The 4.9 million in year two and three I do have a detail on the next slide, and it is basically the service component related to the hundred beds will go to that in just a moment. Number fours expand housing options consistent with the phase two community plan specifically in this this has not been presented to the board in the past. This is $3 million that we're looking at for a match to any potential home key application that we would be bringing forward. Those applications are due shortly, and we currently have a team developing strategies on several different properties and opportunities that we can bring forward for home key consideration.

The $1 million in year two and three is the service component in the event we do need to match and provide for ongoing service monies. Both the $3 million and the $1 million is highly contingent upon the type of project that we are able to bring forward for recommendation, and we are looking at an assortment of options at this point in time. The next area is housing supports working with tenants and property owners and lenders to prevent evictions Knowing that a number of the recent supports have ended, this $900,000 is being placed in future years. In the event we do need to provide some type of bridge and safety net to avoid any future evictions.

The next area is the complex capable engagement with our multidisciplinary team. These are the ongoing staffed intensive outreach teams Again, year one has been funded through a series of grants future years of about 5 million or 2.5 each year is an ongoing funding need we are continuing to look for ongoing grants to continue that service as well. The last area is our outreach workers. We have again funded this fiscal year near two and three We are looking for about $1.7 million to continue this service, we do want to take an in depth look at this service provision and look at best practices overall ensure that we are using the best model the most efficient most effective model when we're providing for outreach services.

And we do have the request for the ongoing services moving forward. Next slide. Great. This is the detail of the $4.9 million in funding that I had referenced earlier. It reflects the amount of funding that the board has already allocated towards many of these efforts, as well as how we have funded year one and services were very much trying to ensure that we are braiding all of our health and human services.

Funding grant funding in order to address a number And then in year two and three, we outline primarily a number of the different service provision dollars that are required moving forward. Let's go to the next slide. The last area is disaster resiliency and we have a number of different strategies indicated here. The first is the implementation of incident management software This would allow for cross sector and agency sharing of information real time across various departments for situational awareness.

We also have the establishment of an emergency public information outreach coordinator position with an emphasis on developing a bilingual train-the-trainer community education program. Our next area is to enhance public and private partnerships to coordinate countywide disaster recovery and response. This is a partnership that we're proposing, it is a no cost partnership. It's basically a process that will establish with United Way to ensure that they're in first position and ready for recovery efforts via series of MOUs The next area is to create an emergency preparedness and response program for preschool providers, to provide for first responder and essential worker childcare.

This would address many of the current concerns that arose during COVID-19 specifically for our first responders and disaster workers who were not able to oftentimes immediately respond on scene due to child care issues. The next area for future years is to develop systems to track and support COVID-19 recovery plan. We want to ensure that our plan is adequately tracked, and all of our outcomes are effectively measured in our progress to achieving all of these strategies are addressed so we have placed in the future years the ability to track and implement the program.

The next area is to update the Santa Barbara County Operational Area Agreement to support multi-area agency and response. And this is more effective systems to work directly with our cities through ensuring our MOUs are in place, and we're working effectively with our operational areas. The lead in this area would be our Director of the Office of Emergency Management.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:57:49

Next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:57:49

slide.

1:57 – 2:0412 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.681:57:55

I'm going to keep

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:57:56

going, assuming that it hasn't moved. So the fiscal slide talks about the purchase of the incident management software. This is a one-time expense to obtain and implement the software. The next area is establishing emergency public information coordinator position. This has a six month allocation Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting Bilingual Train the Trainer Community Education Program would be overseen by this individual. And this person would also focus on whole community recovery and outreach into underserved community to ensure disaster preparedness.

The next area is number three, I again indicated there will be no cost to this. This is the MOU with United Way for support services of vulnerable populations through disaster As well as working directly with direct relief. The next area, as I mentioned previously is the emergency preparedness program for first responders and that has a cost for plan development of about $35,000 and potentially $70,000 ongoing although we're still assessing that overall mean.

And then the last area is the disaster recovery exchange And this is disaster case management system that 211 has actually already purchased, but they do not fully have the capacity to implement. This funding would allow us the opportunity to assist them in the implementation. The last area number six is a $70,000 cost in future years and again as I mentioned before that allows us to develop those MOU's And to bring in some assistance to help us complete that effort.

Next slide. This is a summary or roll up slide of all of the strategies, bottom line cost in year one about $6.9 million and then in future years two and three $24.5 million. Again, it is the staff's goal to continue to look at other funding sources. We will be coming to you next week with some thoughts about the use of ARPA funding and then looking to strategically braid funding throughout the implementation of this plan.

Next slide. So the recommended actions today is that the Board of Supervisors receive and file this report on the Health and Human Services Recovery Strategies, provide any direction or feedback as appropriate regarding these strategies. And then, of course, the CEQA action. So that ends my report. I'm happy to answer any questions. We do have all of our department heads also available on Zoom. And I believe that Mr. Nielsen is actually in the audience up north.

Thank you.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:01:23

Thank you miss must message questions from the board. Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:01:29

I think I have a lot of questions, but let me first start with are we required to have a strategy for ARPA?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:01:41

Terry just left, you know Nancy Anderson is our assistant CEO and budget director and she's been responsible for our requirements for ARPA so let Nancy answer that question.

CommentBoard Hearing Room ChamberProposed · by introduction2:01:52

Supervisor Hartman through the chair. What we have to produce is a recovery plan based on your board's actions, so not necessarily a plan to this level but it's very helpful for all of the reporting requirements that we're going to need. So it does help that all of this work has been done ahead of time so that when your board takes action on any of these items, we include it as part of the county's recovery plan associated to ARPA.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:02:22

So if I'm understanding correctly, we need something but this is more integrative and perhaps more thoughtful than we would see normally in other counties.

CommentBoard Hearing Room ChamberProposed · by introduction2:02:35

And that's exactly right for any of these items that are evidence-based type activity There's an additional reporting requirements that you have to have performance metrics and all of these things that Terry in the department has worked on in order to be thoughtful about this whole process. So those are exactly the types of things that we have to include within the recovery plan itself.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:02:59

Are there things in this plan that we wouldn't be doing or wouldn't want to do necessarily other than if it weren't for COVID recovery? Or does it integrate things largely that we're doing but it pulls them together in a way that may have been siloed before.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:03:17

Supervisor Hartman, I'll let Terri speak to that as well. I think it's both. There are things in here that are definitely integrating things we're already doing and thank you to the departments in particular to Terry Mosnesich for doing that but they're also new things and as we said, we've been talking about recovery probably since January and Terry started pulling departments together very early to look at what we were seeing and to try to address like she said, the primary and secondary most significant impacts so there are things in here Um, we had not proposed before and there are certain things that we know were. Chronic issues or trying to address given the emergency

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:03:52

could you give just a few examples of Terry or this must of the new things? Just so I have a better feel for that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:04:01

Yes, Supervisor Hartman through the chair is thank you to CEO she she hit it right on the elements that I would say are unique is where and we've really tried to pull the thread through each of the activities is really that focus on equity and inclusion. As well as outreach and communication and whole person recovery. So when you look at this plan, what you'll see is an emphasis on services to the vulnerable permeating each and every one of the recovery areas.

And that's also why you see represented in this report what we're calling the equity and inclusion hub In order to have somebody tasked very specifically with ensuring that we're using best practices across all the departments and all of our efforts. So I would say that is a new aspect that hasn't been presented to you in the past.

2:04 – 2:116 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:04:55

Um, Just remind, I'll just make a little statement here. This reminds me a little bit of the Healthy Places Index and that we're defining the five categories, I think, and trying to pull together our different programs under those categories and ultimately have outcomes And I think it's, it's ambitious. But I think we've been working towards this with Renew 2022 to get our departments in shape to be able to collaborate and to really bring a lot more transparency for the board and for the community to know what really does county government do?

And so I'm very supportive of this effort. And it's hard for me to imagine how we were getting through COVID while also getting our feet under us to be planning for post-COVID, and I think the department heads and CEO's office really deserve an enormous amount of credit to have the bandwidth left to be thinking longterm while we're dealing with a crisis

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:06:17

Thank you Supervisor Hartman. Supervisor Hart? Yeah, I think that's so impressive. I really want to give great kudos to Terry and all the department heads in Mona for having the bandwidth that I can't even imagine how you have the bandwidth to do this kind of strategic planning while the crisis is still underway so that we are positioned for recovery in a resilient state. That title I want to start by saying thank you to the board of Supervisors for this important work. The focus of this work is so important, how are we going to get to a place where we're better while responding One of the little details that I'm curious about, knowing more about is on slide 19 where you're talking about the American Community Survey identifying 25% of respondents with no internet access.

Is that in the underserved senior population or is that a larger group of county residents?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:07:31

Supervisor Hart to the chair, what I recall on that is that it was primarily within a segment and I'm not going to recall the exact population. It was several of our specific communities that were highlighted that lack that resource. And I can get that data if I can go through my notes.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:07:53

Well, that would be helpful because it is surprising to see things like that. But as a reminder that the world we live in and many of us are very comfortable accessing information is not consistent across all communities in the county and We're going to rely on modern technology to push information out. You know, bottlenecks like that are significant and we definitely saw that with the COVID information dissemination still seeing it you know there are challenges on the promontories and the other innovative ways that we've done to work around that Thank you very much.

I want to make sure that we have a system that works for everybody in the future when the next need arises. We already have a massive fire in South County, so there's not ever going to be a break probably. We're just going to roll from one really critical moment to the next and developing And is able to adapt to the new challenges of the moment is super critical and I'm so pleased. The temptation, I know amongst folks in the community and other government or partners that we have at the state level, national level, is you know we got a crisis let's throw money at it and we struggle I want to start by saying thank you to all of the board members for being on the receiving end of that. Number one, to make that effective in the moment and number two, to make it sustainable.

That is the biggest challenge for all these things. And the resources are flowing in a one time way. And yet we know when we do this work actually that that doesn't, it's not going to be successful we need to build a system that's long term and and communicating that to our community partners. And to the public is a real big part of this challenge as well. It's how can we build a system that works not just in year one, but it works in year five and doesn't face the fiscal cliff that has all the scrambling to fill? So thanks again for doing this planning.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.772:10:26

Thank you very much. How we talk about the future because you're right, this is what we're relying on a lot of one time funding that probably isn't going to move into the future. So it's important to let the public know that I think it's also important for our strategy moving forward is to identify I want to start by saying thank you to our partners in the legislature that these are now our priorities. We have to talk to them about where the gaps are, where we see where we can pick up some of the load but where we also see that You know, as a tool in the toolbox for me when folks are asking specific questions about how we're responding to things. I think having it in one format really does help us quite a bit.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:36

Thank you. Supervisor Williams?

2:11 – 2:1713 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:11:40

I have three questions. One is the big picture piggybacking on Supervisor Hart and Labanino's questions about sustainability. Is the guidelines for the second year spending broad enough to sort of allocate for some of these, for sustainability 3 years worth of spending

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:12:06

from ARPA?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:14

Could you repeat that? Is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:12:17

the broadness of the dates by which we have to spend broad enough to instead of fund some of these efforts from ARPA over two years, to fund them over three years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:32

I'm going to have Ms. Anderson respond to the timeliness. I understand your question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:12:39

and I can follow up after that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:12:42

The second question is more into the nuts and bolts. Can a board and care facility be located on the same campus as say IMD beds?

CommentBoard Hearing Room ChamberProposed · by introduction2:13:03

Supervisor Williams to the trail chair I'll take the first part of that question and then I'm sure Terry can follow up on the second. In regard to ARPA spending, we have to have the funds obligated by the end of December of 2024 but we have an additional two years through December of 2026 to actually spend it all. So we wanted to get it definitely budgeted and identified how it's going to be spent. But we do have until 2026 in order to actually expend the funds, so there is time to spread that over a three year period and I believe that was Terry's intent.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:13:43

Yes, and let me just jump on there and thank you. I was hesitating as I thought Nancy might give the first part of that. Yes. The way that we've arranged this, One time funding to get started on pushing forward through some strategies via the initial assessments or investments in year one, and then your two and three. Obviously those follow up. I will say as I've mentioned throughout the report.

Outreach and engagement is going to be critical, very specifically as Supervisor Hart referenced with the digital inclusion strategy. We will most definitely already have been reaching out to a number of the philanthropic In the area regarding boarding care and IMD, I know Pam is on the line and she can correct me if I'm wrong. But I believe that yes, they can be housed in the same area or co-located but there is a licensure issue. They are licensed separately as a facility so if Pam can correct me on that if I'm wrong.

Yeah on same campus but separate facilities because they're licensed individually

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:15:15

And then my last question is, you know in cases where there's shared responsibility with another entity and I'll just take for instance the 211 expenditure. Are we basically picking up the whole tab or in this proposal? Or are other and that doesn't mean that we shouldn't do it. I'm just wanting to have my eyes wide open. Or are others contributing to that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:15:47

The Supervisor Williams to the chair two pieces, two answers to that. There's the ongoing 211 costs that are about, I believe that we're close to 180,000 now. The county is continuing to play it to fund the vast majority of that I believe a total of 140,000 if I'm recalling correctly. So that 211 can also be in the position to serve in case management when we have a larger scale disaster. And that is all new funding that's recommended and included as part of the future year strategy. So, that's beyond the day-to-day 211 hotline and tech services that we currently provide for.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:16:45

And Terry if I can assist? Yes, so chair and board. Additionally just to help clarify that funding is the estimated funding for our county to implement the use of that program. So in order to use this software case management program that two-in-one has there's this need for County all of these health and human services and various departments within to be able to upload our services and resources into that system, and to train our staff on how to utilize the system in order to therefore allow two-in-one to provide that support to our community members. And so that is largely associated with our estimate of what it would cost us to have someone help facilitate that process with all of our departments and get us up and running.

Thank you,

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:17:38

Kelly. Thank you.

2:17 – 2:309 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:47

My questions are somewhat feedback on my colleagues, just to feed off of that last one about other jurisdictions contributing. I know that many of these expenses fall squarely under the county purview of Health and Human Services but things like homelessness, are we seeing any of the other jurisdictions step up to partner with us on some of these ARPA funds?

You know, they have the same type of restrictions on the use of their funds. They're going to often be the primary beneficiaries of these funds and I don't know what's coming out of the elected leaders forum or what the conversations are with the other city managers but I'm really interested in seeing those funds be leveraged that the county spends with some of our neighboring jurisdictions any progress there? What more can we be doing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:18:38

Chair Nelson I'll start, I think we've made the conversation we've had the conversation once the city managers at the county was willing to partner. We weren't quite sure what that would look like or how that would be shaped, but we've made that offer that were willing to partner with any of our communities and I know the discussion I believe has come up just about what everyone can do in the elected leaders forum as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:00

So I guess as we spend these you know capital dollars or even ongoing dollars for these next three years, it makes sense that. You know we ask our municipalities on how much of the response, do you want the county to have in your jurisdiction what we can leverage those funds to do? I think it's really important conversation and I know that we have a lot of money at Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board.

So I'm really interested in that moving forward. And my other big concern is year four, we look at all this stuff and where are we at at that point? I don't wanna see a fiscal cliff and layoffs and we make all this progress just to take a step back. I trust our capable staff that's gonna be the back of their mind as they move into this space That's a great question. I think it's important to understand that, you know which positions that we currently have that can be repurposed into some of these new commitments that we make.

You know, I hear outreach caseworkers and engagement. We've got a lot of work to do. And I think it's important for us to weave that into our entire program so it's sustainable, you know, because I don't I think the idea that when these dollars are up that there's gonna be another wave of that is probably an irresponsible position for us to be taking and so we need to be thinking ahead to that. That's why my priority is more often than not is to, you know, capital investments long term investments that we can't do any other time. So we get those infrastructure in place You know, there's this some money that we set aside to partner in additional capital services fund on state home key. My hope is that we're, you know, that's great. That's important.

That leads to some permanent supportive housing but we really need to continue invest in the temporary shelters. We're gonna be working towards an encampment strategy but if we don't have any place to move them to I think we're going to, you know, have that bottleneck. And I think we really need to bring up that level of service and make sure that we have the capacity and that we are moving forward more than just what's already in place with, you know, Isla Vista, Lompoc and Santa Barbara. We need to have some additional locations countywide so that we can really reach those that are most vulnerable in our community and have the most impact on the quality of life in our county. And I think that these ARPA funds are a huge opportunity, and we cannot let that go.

This is an opportunity to prove out that system that if we eliminate these encampments, bring those people indoors, provide them with wraparound services and case management Will it work? Is it something that we can actually move the needle significantly and I'm optimistic. It seems other jurisdictions have done that throughout the country, and I hope that Santa Barbara County becomes one of those examples moving forward so again good presentation look forward to further discussion.

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:22:30

Chair Nelson, thank you very much and I want to again thank Terry for pulling this all together. I also just want to remind everyone in case people are listening none of these strategies are fully funded and it doesn't mean they're all going to be funded from ARPA funds either but what we're presenting to you is based on our department's review of what they thought were the most important next steps in all these areas And a lot of this will be asked of you next week when we look at all the different offer requests put together and some of them do have ongoing costs for which we do not have funding identified, particularly in the homeless area. There are some things that we've already committed to and we'll have a clear discussion with you next week about what we've already committed to but yet have not funded.

And those I think would be a first priority for your board to consider. But having said that, the purpose of the strategy is to come for you to see what we're thinking. See what's going to be requested next week but also that we are still going to look at other funding coming down from the state and federal government. And if we can't find those sources, if it is a priority for your board do you want us to redirect funding at budget or use other general fund? I mean those are kind of the main choices but I do wanna thank Terry for pulling this all together and all the departments who've helped.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:23:48

Thank you. Supervisor

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction2:23:50

Hart? Yeah, just I really appreciate your question about the elected leaders forum on homelessness and how best we can integrate the work of our partner local governments on that challenge. And you know, I'll be honest and say that partnership is still pretty new and fresh Folks are learning about the work everybody is doing. I think that's probably the most significant accomplishments to date, there is much better communication and understanding of the roles everybody plays in the need for our local government partners to be more engaged on this issue but that's pretty new.

The money from ARPA isn't aligned perfectly with the evolution of that conversation You know, there's an understanding that this is a new opportunity and that money would really be helpful to this collaborative effort. But you know more communication and more work amongst us with our friends and colleagues at local governments around the county can only help that so I would encourage anybody who's got You know, some views about this to engage with their council colleague friends and say you know this is really unique moment. This is the time we should all step in together and move this ball forward because it's going to take a new commitment to not just be engaged in the issue but to put money on the table to make it work.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:25:19

Thank you Supervisor Hart and let me I'd just like to add to that for a second Supervisors Lavanino and I both do a radio show. He does it the preview before the supervisors meeting, I do it afterwards on one of our local AM stations. And I was talking about this and I said hey you know we have this funding available to address some of these big issues. I look forward to having other jurisdictions involved And that as well and I quickly got a phone call from one of those jurisdictions going wait, what's this new funding coming from federal government that we can partner with you on and I said what's your ARPA funds in it. The answer was oh, you know, um, I think though.

It is a good chance for them and us to say, okay you know there's it's not as painful right? And it's an opportunity for us to do a proof of concept. You know if we can partner together right now they have those ARPA funds they are you know it's there's always an opportunity cost if they spend it on this they can't spend on something else right and that's what's always hard about it and if the county's just going to take care of it then why don't you know maybe we'll spend it on something else but you know I really invite our jurisdictions to engage because then we're at the table together. We both have skin in the game, and I think that's where we can make some progress. And yes, that probably means when this all the ARPA funding is finished that we still need to continue those partnerships.

But I think by having these funds available from federal government it's a good opportunity for us to kind of work through some of those kinks without having the same pain that if we were having to pull general fund dollars into something like And that there would be some existing operational sacrifices, which may be necessary in the future. But it is something that we have to be thinking about if we really want to solve these issues and really make a dent in this.

So Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:27:03

Well, I think you raised some really good points. I think it's hard for people to get out of their business as usual mode unless they can see a benefit and a new benefit. I don't know whether our plan and being part of that plan could reduce the need for some of the other jurisdictions how we can frame this You know, if they could piggyback on to some of our planning so that they don't have to generate all of this themselves.

You know we through SP CAG we already do work together across jurisdictions. We do it with libraries in a different way where we're thinking about broadband and now homeless Increasingly are finding issues that we need to work together with cities and counties, and we don't really have a structure or way to describe the benefits. But in my life unless you can put some benefits on the table that someone sees that they wouldn't get otherwise it's hard to bring them into a partnership. So maybe we can think about that.

I did have a couple other points I wanted to make while I've got the mic on one of the things that I think we learned or a couple things we learned during the covert area era was, was how significant partnerships were and we mentioned There are, you know so many entities in the community stepped up and worked hand in hand with the county to get things done. And I just think that really deserves a shout out. I often say government can't do it alone but when we can get a plan, a template and then get everybody pulling in the same direction It can really work and I'm really proud of our county in what, you know from individuals to organizations stepping up across the board.

The other thing we saw was communication and how critically important it is to have clear consistent messaging going out. And I see that reflected in this plan that lesson. The other thing and I talked with Terry about this last week but For me, one of the lessons was how important parks and trails and outdoor experiences are. That was important I think to keep people healthy and keep people sane.

So I know this is more the health and human services piece of it but I just don't want to forget that other part because for health and well-being being active is fundamental

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:29:48

Thank you Supervisor Hartman. You know, and just to kind of respond to that, you know, jurisdictions seeing something that they get is tangible, that they can see that improvement. And I think that's where the encampment strategy comes in because if we did, you know, they're the ones are going to have that impact, you know, they're gonna have the blight, they're gonna have the potential environmental impacts within their community, public safety impacts and if we can really address I think that is where we are going to see those benefits. That has been my speech for a while and I will keep pounding on it . With that, let's go ahead

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:30 – 2:3411 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction2:30:40

To Nelson and members of the board that is correct we have one request to speak on this item, and that is Maria customer on zoom.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:30:51

Hello Board of Supervisors I actually signed up for the wrong comments section, but I will respond to this item. I am a parent of a special needs child and for years, I had to advocate and go after government bureaucracy in order for my daughter to have access to her legal rights. It either be education or social security or other services she is entitled to under the law.

And I want to respond to this that this item is really Directed from the federal level, this is to take away checks and balances at the local government. So everything comes under federal control by providing finances for all institutions like schools like any other local agencies. And this is a direct result of blanket COVID policies that could have been actually efficiently be more directed with targeted policies we've known from day one, who was vulnerable or physically sick or susceptible to this pandemic. And this is a total power grab in my opinion because I had fight for years as I said I have a fact finding track record with three legal settlements in this case one ending up in federal court having to fight daily for 23 years for my disabled daughter, and suddenly I see money is just suddenly flowing everywhere as if there's no budget.

No, no. No difficulty having, you know being able to access any funds and that's totally contradictory to what I have experienced. And so to me this entire flow of money is basically done under the disguise of compassion and environmental issues and it's not. It is a It's just shocking to see this since I have extensive experience with government bureaucrats and experts being on the wrong side of the issue. Thank you

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction2:33:11

for staying.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:12

Thank you, Miss Kessner.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction2:33:15

And that was our only speaker on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:17

Okay so that concludes public comment on this item back to the board any additional comments or questions from the board or from staff? Okay, seeing none. Can I get a motion on this item? I believe it's a receiving file and provide directions. I think we've made comments but Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.822:33:37

I move items A through C in our staff report today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:41

Second. Second from Supervisor Labanino. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move items A through C in our staff report today. Second. Second from Supervisor Labanino. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?
Show transcript
Supervisor Labanino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye. Supervisor Hart? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye. And Chair Nelson? Aye
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction2:33:57

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:59

Okay. For the purposes of agenda management, we're going to go ahead and we will be taking a 10 minute break here briefly and then we'll be doing the workforce board item. And then we'll be recessing into closed session a little late here if you're here for the department item number three regarding Keysight 3 in Orchid that would probably be around 2 30 or a little bit later today so just want to put that on your radar if you're tuning So, with that we're going to take a brief break and then we'll be back here.

And let's go at 1145

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:34:36

so eight minute break.

2:43 – 2:497 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:43:57

The next item is departmental item number two. Madam Clerk, will you please read that item into the record?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction2:44:03

Chair Nelson and members of the board, departmental item number two is from social services. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a workforce development board presentation and report on activities accomplishments and recovery.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:44:22

Okay I believe we have who's kicking it off here

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:44:27

Good morning. Ray, welcome. Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:31

We can.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:44:32

Okay thank you very much. Good morning Chair Nelson and members of the board my name is Ray McDonald I'm the Executive Director of the Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share information about the Santa Barbara County-wide workforce system. If I can have slide two. Today's presentation We'll cover the following. First, a review of what the Workforce Board is and does, the relationship between the Workforce Board and the County Board of Supervisors, the roles and responsibilities of each, and some of the statistical data that speaks to the accomplishments of the workforce system.

The second part of my presentation will speak to current status of our recovery from COVID-19 pandemic, including state initiatives and one time programs that are created to help with our economic and workforce facilities. Can I have the next slide please? Slide three. Thank you. So let's begin. The Workforce Development Board is the latest iteration of the public private workforce partnership created by the federal government This partnership dates back to the New Deal of FDR and was revitalized under LBJ and The Great Society.

There are over 500 workforce boards nationwide, and we are currently funded by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunities Act of 2014. The mission of the Workforce Development Board as spelled out in federal legislation is to serve two primary customers, the job seekers who are looking for career pathways and good paying jobs. And the private sector business community that is a lifeblood of the local economy.

The workforce partnership is between private sector led Workforce Board and the locally designated governmental entity. The governor of each state designates local workforce areas and certifies local workforce boards. The local government is called the CLEO, which stands for Chief Local Elected Official. So you may see that on some correspondents that come to the state and is selected by the governor to partner with the local workforce board.

And this way there's a true partnership at the local level overseen by the governor. It should be noted that only the governor can disband the local workforce board and the federal legislation designates specific categories of individuals to serve on the workforce board so we're going to show a couple slides here, can I go to slide four? This slide shows the categories of Workforce Development Board membership And now can I go to slide five?

And this one shows the individuals here in Santa Barbara County who are filling those positions. Now if you can go back to slide three, thank you. The federal legislation provides that the Workforce Development Board hire their own executive director to represent the board's interests and to implement the functions of the Workforce Development Board, and the actions approved by the Workforce Development Board.

The federal legislation speaks to roles and responsibilities of each partner. The role of the government is to provide the processes and fiscal integrity for the Workforce Development Board's operation. And that's what you see on the right-hand side of this chart that you're looking at. For example, all of our contracts are approved by the Board of Supervisors. That means they have been reviewed by County Council, Risk Management, the County Executive Office and follow the procedures created by the Department of General Services.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:49:07

The Workforce Development Board

2:49 – 2:543 turns

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:49:14

The role of the Workforce Development Board is to create local workforce policies consistent with federal and state laws and guidance, to oversee the operation of workforce programs, to build strategic partnerships, to select program operators, and to approve the budget. And that's the thing that's talked about on the left hand side of this diagram that you're looking at.

So can we now move forward to slide number six? Thank you. Our annual allocated budget, which is based on the federal formula is roughly 3.1 million per year. What you see here was our last two years of funding before the current year. It funds programs that serves the adult population 18 years and older as well as recently laid off adults with vocational assessment, counseling and training.

It also funds programs for young people, youth ages 14 to 24 with career exploration and subsidized jobs. Lastly our formula allocation funds two specific services to the business community. One assistance with finding employees And two, assistance during downsizing or closures of a business. Next slide, slide seven. Thank you. Before speaking to our pre-pandemic and pandemic statistics for our WIOA programs I want to point out that the federal and state governments have created a second tier of funding that workforce development boards can access.

These are competitive brands that usually speak to specific targeted populations, for example veterans or ex-incarcerated individuals or gang related youth and sometimes they speak to industry specific layoffs or closures or other significant initiatives. As this chart shows, the Santa Barbara Workforce Development Board has been successful in competing for additional funding and has temporarily increased our budget by $5.2 million. So that's an addition to the 3.1.

The additional funding on this chart is for programs that end as early as March of 2022 or as late as December of 2024. Combined, these special grants will provide enrolled services and training for 965 Santa Barbara County residents.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:52:23

Can we go to slide eight?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:52:26

Now back to our formula funded programs This chart shows performance data for the program year immediately preceding the pandemic, which was our last normal year. We enrolled 282 adults at our two one-stop centers that actually are named America's Job Centers of California. That's a statewide brand that we have to use and is used all over the state This allowed these folks to receive more intensive services such as individual case managers, vocational counseling and vocational skills training.

I'll take a moment to define a few of those performance measures that you see on your screen. So employed are individuals who have jobs when they exit the program. Retained Retained means employed individuals who are still employed 10 months after exiting the program. And measurable skills gain speaks to pre and post educational testing of individuals who were assessed to need basic education as part of their program plan.

So if we move down, if you look down further on the chart, you'll see our numbers for the youth served at 215 during this pre-pandemic year. And at the time of exit from the program, 65% were either employed or continued with their education. So I want to point out now that our youth programs are not intended to result in youth obtaining full-time permanent employment but rather are meant to ensure That young people have the opportunity to understand local jobs and industry sectors, and what's available for them in the local community.

2:54 – 3:105 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:38

Ray, I got a quick question on this slide. Sure,

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:54:40

great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:41

This is Sue Reznor-Nelson. The medium income? Yes. Is that annualized?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.682:54:50

Yes it is. Okay, all right. Thank you. And we're on slide 9 I believe.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated2:55:07

Oh yes, okay so I don't this slide shows the same data I was on the previous slide, but it's for the pandemic year. And as you can see, obviously the numbers are really way off from the previous pre-pandemic year and that's obvious because of the pandemic. So the targets were not met. The numbers served were not done obviously met getting jobs is obviously not happening with The pandemic here so we did want to put point that out.

So we didn't have to report that to the state and it's same all across the not only the state but the country numbers are off this fall. So can I have slide 10 before we leave program performance though, I want to share our cost per participant enrolled numbers again for the pre pandemic year This chart shows us having a cost of $6,071 per participant enrolled in the adult program and $7,454 for recently separated or dislocated worker participants and $5,702 per youth served or enrolled.

Please remember that we also serve at our job centers, those two job centers that I spoke about. Walk-in traffic with job leads and job fairs and they have access to resume building computers and other non enrolled services and activities. The program rules don't allow us to include these non enrolled activities and services And our performance calculations that you saw on the previous slides. But we do collect this information and during the pre-pandemic year, we provided 17,159 of those non enrolled services across the county.

So with that I'm going to move on to discussion about our COVID-19 pandemic response. So that would be slide number 11 Okay, and Terry Nussage spoke to these numbers but I'll do this again. This slide speaks to the spike in unemployment in our county to nearly 15% in May of 2020 which is the height of the pandemic and where most of the businesses were closed before decreasing back down to on this slide it shows 5.8% Um, for July and as Terry also pointed out the unemployment rate in our county for the month of August which just came out. Um is 5.5%. So the number is going down but what you'll also note of course is that we have all also had numbers lower than 5% pre pandemic so The Santa Barbara workforce system has responded to this job crisis in several ways.

First, we like many other organizations increased our online presence and offerings. We took applications online. We provided information and work preparation courses online so that those folks who are confined to being at home to take care of their children or because their place of work was closed Had a way to brush up on some skills that they might need when they came back to work.

Also at the onset of the COVID-19, we participated in a number of activities. We participated with the REACH organization and their business leadership planning meetings. We participated with the weekly South Coast Chamber Regional Business Sync Ups. The UCSB Economic Forecast had some webinars and we were panelists on one of those webinars. The Econ Alliance Zooms, and numerous other webinars. We continue to engage with these organizations and others such as the Santa Barbara County Business Development Committee, the Business Task Force Roadmap to Recovery, and the Santa Barbara County Business Engagement Roundtable.

And lastly we also serve on a multi-county Central Coast business engagement round table So if we can go to slide 12. In partnership with the California Employees Association, we are providing to the county business community a human resources hotline by calling this toll-free number. Business owners will have their questions answered by a live human On the latest covid information from the state as well as other state employment law information.

This service will be available through September of 2022. We also as you may know commission a COVID-19 impact report from the workforce and economic development research firm BW Research Incorporated that we released in early May of 2021. I want to speak to just a few of the items contained in that report, that have asked... The research team has done some updates on some of the numbers for us.

So this report speaks to the jobs lost and the impact on the pandemic on key Santa Barbara County industry sectors. We released this report In tandem with a similar report commissioned by the county of San Luis Obispo. And part of our report was funded by the Santa Barbara Foundation, who we want to acknowledge and thank. So on slide 13 if we could go to that.

This slide speaks to the labor force participation rate or The percentage of the working age population that's actually in the workforce. This number dropped as you can see to below 59% and March of 2020, but then has recovered to a little bit more than 61%, by July of 2021. Which is the last month that we have information for. As you can see, the yellow line is the state's line and it's more stable than our line which is Santa Barbara County which goes up and down and up and down.

One of the things that we believe accounts for our labor force participation rate has to do with a large number of young retirees who retired in Santa Barbara County So that's one possible explanation for that, but that number speaks for itself. So can I have slide number 14? So this is where we're talking about the next three slides are examining specific industry sectors in Santa Barbara County.

This data actually goes back as far as 2016 and it ends through this past summer. We wanted to have A long history of what the pre pandemic years look like so that we could get a good feeling for what changes were happening and if there was just up and down secular or something that was more significant. So on this particular slide, it shows what I'll point out is that it shows that manufacturing which is light manufacturing in our county was down 6.3% of the jobs From the pandemic to the end of the period that this was for, which is July of this year. The construction industry was up a mere 1.1% while trade, transportation and utilities sector was slightly down by 1.9%. And transportation and utilities, it's where you get your long haul drivers Also you'll see on this particular slide, you'll see the oil offshore oil and drilling.

But that's an outliner for us because that had been decreasing significantly much prior to the pandemic so we're just kind of tossing that one out as being affected by the pandemic although there were probably some minor effects to it but its decrease was happening long before the pandemic started So with that, I'd like to go to slide 15. This slide shows the professional and business services sector spiking upwards to 24.1%. That's where you had a lot of those delivery services and items like that people started using because they were confined to being at home. So there were a lot of business service and professional services that kicked up.

The information technology rebounded to its previous pre-pandemic levels, and that's because they could do a lot of their work from home. And so there was very little layoffs that occurred in that area. Financial services which includes real estate has decreased by 3% of fewer jobs. So now if we can go to slide 16. The educational and health services Which includes preschool, by the way.

Sector had a slight increase in jobs of 1.1%, and that's probably negligible or not something to... That really indicates a lot because it's just 1.0%. Government had a large decline of 22%. Government includes education so the school teachers and the people in the educational industry That's included in that particular sector. Leisure and hospitality ended up at the end of this particular period, 14.3% minus. That's a minus there. It may not look like it on the chart but it's a minus 14. 3%. But it had at one time been down to over 40%, so that's A pretty healthy rebound for the hospitality and leisure sector.

Finally, going to slide number 17. This slide shows the initial deep dive in consumer spending Because so many people were out of work, but then it had recovered to 7.5% above pre-pandemic levels and again this was in July and in July we still had a lot of the support that was going on with enhanced unemployment insurance and other support that was coming to folks that ended on September 1st So now if we can go to slide 18 Okay The impact report results that I just reviewed with you in part help the WDB staff develop the recovery guidelines that are on the current slide.

The guidelines that we feel are most appropriate path forward for workforce activities fall into three buckets. The first one is data collection, it's called Workforce Intelligence in our lingo and the workforce arena. And we've been talking about a lot of that sort of information, data collection and data analysis and industry observations and analysis, that sort of thing. So we feel that that's one thing that's important for us to continue to do as we're moving toward recovery.

The second bucket is reemployment programs and that's your basic programs that we're doing helping folks find jobs, which is one of our core missions. Because of the pandemic, we would be increasing our activity in this particular arena. And then the last one is a big catch all and it's more towards system building that's where we're talking about Program evaluation, we're talking about communities of learning. We're talking about community navigators. There are a lot of small organizations that are also helping people get work and so we want to be able to connect with those folks and maybe make them part of a bigger broader system that we have here within the county. So those are our three buckets that we have there.

So if we can go to slide number 19, which is almost my next slide. Okay the governor has included in the signed state budget for this year approximately 1.1 billion in state funds some of it is from the American Rescue Plan Act earmarked for workforce related activities while the details are still being finalized The one-time funding will last through approximately 2024 or 2025. I recall you were having a conversation about how long some of this one time funding would last, so in the state of this funding that's going to be coming to the workforce boards we know that it's going to be 2024 or 2025.

We also know that it's going to focus on planning for economic recovery which is some of the things that Terry Nissage was talking about earlier, as well as enhanced collaborations with our economic development partners like REACH, as well as our community college system. As I said before, the details are still coming to us and within the next 60-90 days we should know more about that. So with that can we go to slide number 20?

This concludes my presentation And I wanna end by showing some of the collaborations and projects and activities that we participate in at the Workforce Board. But I don't have time to go into and discuss during today's presentation, which was primarily meant to inform the board about who the Workforce Board is, what we do, and for you to see the type of things that we perceive that are gonna be happening in the future. With that, I'm going to end and I'm ready to answer your questions.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:10 – 3:1715 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:10:34

Thank you Mr. McDonald.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:10:36

Questions from the board? Supervisor Hart? Yes, thank you Mr. McDonald for the excellent presentation really appreciate the perspective looking at what you do one of the questions I had is do you have any kind of guesstimate about what the California Comeback Plan funding will mean for our own Workforce Development Board when the dust settles and those funds are allocated by the state?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:11:00

There's two possibilities on that that's a very good question Supervisor Hart through the chair. One possibility is that the funding comes directly to the individual Workforce Development Boards and there are 45 Workforce Development Boards in California so that money could come to us, 45 boards or the state could decide that what they wish to do is to provide it to regional planning units. There are 14 regional planning units That are in the state of California that the governor has designated. And in our area, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo are the designated regional planning unit. So the funding could come to the regional planning unit but we know that it's going to require us to work with our community colleges is going to require us to develop a workforce focused economic recovery plan And that we are going to be required to work with certain partners.

That's the part that we don't know. So, that's the best that I can answer your question at this particular point, Supervisor.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:12:11

Does that regional planning unit exist now as a collaborative partnership? Yes. So it's a matter of working through that process and allocating the funds to various programs within San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara County through that process. Okay.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:12:25

Right. Let me speak a little bit more about that since you mentioned that. We are the latest of the 15 regional planning units, Santa Barbara and Slough County. Santa Barbara Workforce Development Board is the lead agency on our planning unit. So the funding would actually wind up coming to us here in Santa Barbara based upon a A plan that we've developed with San Luis Obispo and then the funding would go as necessary to San Luis Obispo or maybe in some cases, Santa Barbara would pay for activities to be done in both San Luis Obispo as well as Santa Barbara County. So it can work that way too so I wanted to elaborate a little bit on how RPUs work.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction3:13:12

Thank you so much for that clarification.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:13:15

Other questions from the board? Supervisor Labadino. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.773:13:20

And then I'll get to you, Supervisor Williams, sorry. Hey Ray, I just wondered if you could speak for a second about the... I guess the mood that's out in the community right now when I look at the unemployment numbers being where they are but then when you drive around town and you see all the help wanted signs, you see people paying exorbitant bonuses to try to sign people How do we justify those two numbers? What we're seeing out on the street, and then we do actually see unemployment numbers. How do those jive with each other?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:13:56

Good question Supervisor Labanino through the Chair. What's happening is that a lot of folks are making adjustments to their lives at this point based upon the pandemic. Women are still not coming back to work in numbers Um, that were pre pandemic. We do know that we know that there are a lot of jobs that are out there that people want folks to come back to, um, and

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.683:14:30

sorry.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:14:31

Okay. Um, and what we also know is that folks are being very picky at this time I was at a workforce conference in early September And we all agreed, this is me and my counterparts. We all agree that this is the first time probably in our working lives where it's a job seekers market as opposed to an employer's market. So very definitely job seekers are being picky and choosy. That's why you do see the bonuses.

They are deciding whether or not the work life balance They're making decisions based upon that, and they're also looking for the best offers. And so they're holding off a little bit. It's going to be interesting to see again this is October. The September unemployment figures haven't come out yet. So it'll be interesting to see what September and October and November looks like but At this point, I've talked with a number of the chamber folks. I've also talked with some business people about their difficulties in getting their positions filled and there's no magic bullet. I think that what we're all trying to do is we're trying to test out as many ways of responding and many methods as possible to see what works We're going to be doing a job fair with folks in Lompoc coming up soon.

I know that there's been another, what's called a walk around job fair that's happened actually in Slough County where it was a particular geographical area sort of like a mall or let's say State Street where all the businesses did a job fair together and people just walked from business to business and see what they had to offer That sort of thing. So those are the type of things that people are responding to and trying to find ways to get folks back to work, fill those empty jobs that we know are out there.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.773:16:41

And then I guess tied into that too Ray is so what's the status of federal unemployment extension of benefits? And how does that play into the whole picture?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:16:51

The Federal Unemployment Insurance benefits ended September 1st.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:55

OK alright thank you. Thank you Sir. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:17:02

Yeah, if you could put up slide 13 so I'm trying to jive what we perceived to be the case and what you just mentioned about women not returning to the workforce with that slide. On slide 13 it appeared from the slide that our participation rate of adults in jobs is higher than it was post pandemic or at least comparable. Am I misreading that?

3:17 – 3:2620 turns

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:17:42

No, you're looking at the blue line and the problem with Santa Barbara County's labor force participation rate is that it goes up and down so much. And the reason that we believe it goes up and down so much has to do with folks who are being seasonal workers, as well as folks who are out of the workforce temporarily because of childcare issues or folks who have taken early retirement.

And so I don't know...I don't have a fast answer for Why that participation rate is where it is. That's something that, as I mentioned before one of the things that we want to look at going forward is data collection and analysis and that's something that we'd want to dive deeper into but there's a lot of variables there and so I can't tell exactly why we have that high participation rate at this particular point in time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:18:50

Just a request, I mean this is an area of great deal of interest on my part and probably on my colleagues' parts. The minute you have additional information, I hope you will forward it to us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:19:13

So I have a couple of questions and I think I might have an explanation to why you know our counties up and down. I'm looking at the this that chart, and it's you know we're down every November through January. And we are heavily agricultural community, and I think where you see it being more stable. It's across more jobs statewide, so you don't see as much of an impact. But you know up here in the North County it's a pretty big deal and actually even in the South Coast we've got a lot of agriculture from this county and so I think that's what needs to be recognized there. I think things got fairly unpredictable during the COVID pandemic and that's also reflected as well but it does seem like that we're up. You know something It's striking and concerning to me in this presentation.

I was going back to slide eight, and you know, I asked when we talked about those participants in the program, you know, the median earnings, and I hope...I was hoping you were gonna say monthly? Worst case scenario, I was hoping that you were going to say quarterly earnings. But it's really disappointing to see that those are the annual earnings. Just back of the napkin math on that.

And this is better than what it is during the pandemic. So this is probably part of the pandemic. Even at minimum wage, you're looking at 12 hours a week annualization on adults. And so, and then you look at the cost per participant. And I know what you guys are trying to do. I know everything's well-intentioned but to me this is very concerning as a taxpayer looking at the program going, are we getting a bang for our buck here? You know, I know that we didn't design this program. This is taking a lot of federal dollars down and we're trying to implement it and provide a resource.

But this is something that I think Supervisor. Should be concerning.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:21:13

Supervisor, I made a mistake. You're right. It is monthly. I'm sorry. Oh

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:19

wow.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:21:21

OK. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:21

feel much better then. Thank you.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:21:23

It was my mistake. I was looking somewhere else and I spoke too soon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:29

All

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:21:29

right well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:30

then I removed my objection at this point so thank you. So I apologize for

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:21:36

jumping too far into that. No, no, I made a mistake

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:39

Okay, no and that's great news then because then that does show that we're building skills. We're putting people in position to get ahead of household jobs. I think some of those are still if you looked at our AMI from last week with workforce housing maybe these people can still can't afford a house in Santa Barbara County but at least it's movement in the right direction maybe too you know Two earners of that might get you there.

But that helps me out a lot, thank you.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:22:13

And again I'm sorry about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:22:14

No thanks for correcting that. All right Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:22:21

A couple of questions has COVID changed the type of jobs that are available or that we anticipate for our workers?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:22:32

And in some instances, it has. For example, in the manufacturing area because a lot of people are manufacturing or working close together as well as folks in an office they can observe the social distancing so maybe slows down the number or decreases the number of people who can actually come back to work So that's one aspect. The other aspect is the obvious one, which is a lot of things are being taken and done online as much as possible.

People have gotten used to shopping online and so there's probably been a decrease in folks going out and shopping in retail area, that sort of thing. As adjustments are being made on a regular basis by individual businesses in regards to bringing back their workers and what kind of changes because of COVID-19 they're going to institute, whether or not those are gonna be permanent changes or just temporary changes because of health concerns. So there's that we are aware of.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:23:50

Thank you. And, uh, workforce development boards. Generally is it working with unemployed in kind of a case management structure or it looks like in terms of your recovery options that you may be doing more workforce intelligence? That is looking at trends in the economy and where jobs are going and trying to direct people to get those skills.

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:24:21

Well, okay. Very good question through the chair. What the Workforce Development Board's mission is really to get people as I said at the very beginning into well-paying jobs. We are trying to get people into career pathways and move them up the ladder so that's one of the things that we're looking to do what I didn't provide you, during today's presentation was sort of the flowchart on how participants actually move through our program. And so that could give you the sense that a lot of what we do is the workforce data collection etc., but we do have participants who are come to our two one-stop centers they receive services or self service initially And hopefully can get a job by utilizing the tools that we have there for them to use. If they're having a problem getting a job or if they have career aspirations that they are assessed to be good for, and that's the vocational assessment part, they will be enrolled into the program, they will get a case manager, they will have an employment plan that could include, and most often does, Training.

So training is done either in a classroom setting or an on-the-job training or subsidized employment type of environment so that they can be placed at a employer who will have half of the worker's salary reimbursed, that's one way. Or they could go to a class to learn a skill at City College or at Hancock College and with those skills then get placed with an employer.

So our mission is to help people find long-term good paying jobs. And I hope I answered your question with that. It

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction3:26:20

helps, thank you.

3:26 – 3:3019 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:24

Thank you Supervisor Hartman. Supervisor Lavinia?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.773:26:26

Thank you and I think Supervisor Hartman really got ready to kind of lay out what the Workforce Development Board's all about. I think he did a good job with that. It's probably one of the best kept secrets out there. If you're not looking for a job, you don't really know about it and by the time you do need a job, so it's something I think for all of us to kind of take and get it out in the community.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.823:26:48

And you serve on the board?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.773:26:49

I do serve on the board and honestly when I first started on it, I really didn't know anything about it. So it's really been an eye opener. There's probably no time worse than somebody's life than when you looking for a jo that you really do need. This is a weird circumstance right now where like Ray said people The employee is a little bit more in control than the employer.

But I always remember that, I think it was Ronald Reagan that said the difference between a recession and a depression is when... A recession's when your neighbor loses his job but a depression's when you lose your own. So there are great programs at the Workforce Development Board. Ray's doing a great job under Daniel and it's a really good team there. And I think we... It's one of those really You know, it's a diamond in the rough kind of secret that not a lot of people know about and we've got to do a little bit better job probably amongst ourselves of getting that word out into the community as well.

Just really a lot of good work being done at the Workforce Development Board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:27:52

Thank you Supervisor Labadino. All right Madam Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction3:27:58

So Nelson and members of the board. Yes, we have one request to speak on this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:28:02

Okay let's go ahead and do

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.683:28:03

that

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction3:28:04

and we will go to zoom for Glenn Morris.

PresenterGlenn Morrismember of the workforce development board and the boards executive committee andProposedself-stated3:28:12

Good afternoon chair Nelson and members of the board my name is Glenn Morris I serve as a member of the workforce development board and the boards executive committee and on behalf of the board Today, I just wanted to take a moment to express our appreciation for the Board of Supervisors and the county executive staff in their support and partnership in this endeavor.

We appreciate your comments today and the questions you've asked. And just wanted to share the board's commitment to continue looking at creative ways to support both the employers in our community as well as the potential workers who are looking to find ways to advance their careers. Our goal is to ensure that Santa Barbara County is both competitive for businesses while at the same time providing good career paths for our local residents. Again, we appreciate your partnership and look forward to continuing to work with your board going forward. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:29:11

Thank you Mr. Morris. All right with that let's back to the board any additional questions or comments from staff?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.683:29:24

Ray, you good?

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated3:29:26

I'm good. I appreciate Supervisor Lavanino's kind remarks also. I will point out that in one of the courts of federal government legislation, the Workforce Development Boards are prohibited from marketing ourselves. So that's one of the reasons that we're the best kept secret in the community is that we cannot market ourselves at this low cost.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:00

With that, can I get a motion to approve the recommended actions?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.773:30:06

I'll make that motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:07

Thank you, Supervisor Lavinino. A second from Supervisor Hart. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. Thank you, Supervisor Lavinino. A second from Supervisor Hart. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavinino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye Supervisor Hart? Aye Supervisor Hartman? Aye and Chair Nelson? Aye
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction3:30:23

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:25

Okay, we're going to go ahead and recess for closed session.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.683:30:30

Before you do.

3:30 – 3:326 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:35

See me a sudden

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:30:36

Nelson as you know I am the director of emergency services and we do have an emergency so if you could wait one moment I want to just pull up the right information. Found it, thank you. Due to the emergent nature of the Ellisville fire I will be requesting that the Board of Supervisors consider a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local state emergency following closed session so approximately 1 30 or 2pm and information is being sent to all media outlets on this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:31:23

Thank you. All right, I think we're actually that's a little optimistic. I think we're probably looking at more like 230 coming back from closed session so but before just for the general public also those who are watching that want to speak to our third and final item today. Well, I don't think that we'll be hearing that much earlier than 230 but Madam Clerk can you please read the items for closed session?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:31:51

Mr. Chair, members of the board we've got three items on for closed session today two cases of existing litigation under government code section 54956.9 United States Judith Zissa versus County of Santa Barbara which is a federal case in the Central District and Murray versus County of Santa Barbara also in the Central District And we have one case of anticipated litigation under government code section 54956.9 significant exposure to litigation, one case and as you said the time estimate is at least two hours maybe two and a half.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:32:25

All right so again we're recessed to closed session approximately two hours

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.683:32:31

approximately around 2 30 thank you.

5:46 – 5:5122 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:46:36

Okay, welcome back. We are just coming back from closed session. Madam County Council can you report out from closed session today?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed5:46:46

Thank you Mr. Chair the board met in closed session on three items two cases of existing litigation Zissa versus County Santa Barbara and Murray versus County Santa Barbara both central district cases and one case of anticipated litigation significant exposure to litigation one case and the board took no reportable action

CommentAmy SmithProposed5:47:05

All right, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed5:47:09

And Mr Chair members of the board prior to closed session CEO my me a photo as the director emergency services requested that your board take an action come back and consider taking an action on proclaiming an emergency for the Alice all fire. Due to the emergency nature of the fire and based on the Brown Act Authority, Government Code Section 54954.2 and 54956.5, the board has the option to consider adoption of the resolution and proclamation I'm going to start with the first item on the agenda, which is the fire that was caused by the fire. And that's pursuant to government code section 8630 a. Prompt action is necessary due to the disruption and threatened disruption of public facilities including but not limited to the operation of the Texas Landfill Railway Service enclosure of Highway 101.

Would win an emergency situation exists The Brown Act allows So at this time, I can turn over to the Clerk of the Board to just go over the posting of these items.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:48:21

Yes, thank you. Chair Nelson and members of the board I would just like to note for the record that the ex-agenda item request as well as the board letter and proclamation have been distributed to the board as well as made available online in two places both on our Granicus website included with our agenda immediately following administrative item number 17 on our agenda today As well as on our ReadySBC.org, excuse me, ReadySBC.org backslash alisal hyphen fire backslash and this has also been made available to the public in both our hearing rooms here in Santa Maria and Santa Barbara.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.685:49:08

Okay so

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.775:49:11

So Mr. Chair, do you need a motion to accept this as ex-agenda first? Okay I'll make that motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:49:19

Okay so I have a motion and a second. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll? That's to accept this item as an ex-agenda item for today's meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed5:49:29

Sorry Chair Nelson and members of the board. And Mr. Chair members of the board as part of that motion you are finding that an emergency situation exists that justifies adding this to the agenda

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:49:40

So make a motion and the seconder acknowledges that. Yep, okay all right I guess before we call it is there any public comment on that?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:49:49

Chair Nelson and members of the board I have not received any requests to speak on the emergency exit agenda proclamation. Okay great

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:49:55

so with that seeing no further discussion on the board Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye Supervisor Hart? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye. And Chair Nelson? Aye
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:50:08

Motion passes to add the ex-agenda item on to our agenda today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:50:11

Okay now that's on the agenda, can I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.775:50:15

make a motion

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:50:16

to

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.775:50:16

move items A through D?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:50:19

Madam Clerk do you need to read that?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:50:26

Thank you, Chair Nelson and members of the board. Before you today on the X agenda, we have an item brought to you by the County Executive Officer regarding a proclamation of local emergency caused by the all assault fire. And this is in all supervisorial districts. And yes, if we can get a motion to approve staff recommendations A through B.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:50:48

So move. Second. So I have a motion and second. Any further discussion? Madam Clerk, actually is there any public comment on this ex-agenda item?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:50:59

Chair Nelson and members of the board if you can bear with me one moment we did have someone just log in let me just double check. Turn Nelson and members of the board, we have no request to speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:51:21

OK, great so we have a mode so we got emotion in a second from Supervisor Lavagnino and a second from supervisor Hart. Is there any further discussion on the board? Seeing none, Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino. Aye. Supervisor Williams. Aye. Supervisor Hart. Aye Supervisor Hartman. Aye And Chair Nelson. Aye

5:51 – 6:0719 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:51:41

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:51:43

All right I want to make sure I thank Terry Mocznicich and County Council staff on moving on that quickly and Chelsea of course great work and thank you for being so responsive With that, I believe

the next item on the agenda is departmental item number three. Madam Clerk will you please call that into record?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction5:52:10

Thank you. Thank you, Chair Nelson and members of the board departmental item number three is from planning and development. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the county Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the SB Clark LLC residential subdivision Keysight 3 project 13 GPA 513

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:52:36

Okay, great. Before we get started on this item is there a requirement for ex parte communication on this? So let's go ahead and at this time is there any ex parte communications that the board wants to go? Supervisor

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.775:52:52

Lavinia. Thank you I did meet with the applicant and toured the site discussed access questions And received, you know, got his opinion on what he believed was proper access. And that was a very short meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:53:12

Okay. Any other Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.825:53:16

Yes I also had a Zoom meeting and a site visit with the applicant and we discussed the history of the project including the recent Planning Commission decision secondary access cluster versus distributed development trails in open space.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:53:30

All right thank you. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:53:34

I also had a Zoom meeting with the applicant.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:53:39

All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:53:39

right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:53:40

and while we wait for Supervisor Hart, you know being a member of the Orchid community as a resident and as a representative and previously Chief of Staff, I've had quite a bit of contact with this site Over a better part of the last eight or nine years here, I actually had my first meeting on this site on February 28th 2013 with Ernie Mancy and John Franklin.

Discussions of the history as well as a desire at that time to remove the MRO property off their site met again with John Franklin on February 21st 2014 Since I also discussed the project since then, I've also met with some of the neighbors. May 19th 2019 with some of the Chancellor neighbors at the residence of Patrick Sheehy and again I met on September 7th this year with Bill Brown one of the neighbors in the Chancellor area.

A site visit on March 30th of this year with Matt Mancy, Ernie's son. As well as a Zoom meeting with him on September 9th of this year. I've also heard from many many members of the public over the last 10 years so got a lot of history and feedback if you will. So Supervisor Hart do you have any Ex parte disclosures?

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction5:55:07

Yes, I met with the applicant on site about two weeks ago. I can't recall the date. I was looking through my calendar but I'll find that

PresenterRay McDonald I'mthe Workforce Development Board and I'm pleased for this opportunity to share inProposedself-stated5:55:17

date.

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction5:55:18

All right thank you

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.685:55:20

so with that Ms. Plowman?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction5:55:28

Good afternoon, Mr. Chair members of the board today we're here before you to hear the recommendation from the Planning Commission on the proposal for key site three on May 26th of this year, the planning commission recommended to deny the project and we have Ms Reese Shannon Reese is the planner on it and she's with us today to make the presentation on the project We also have available via Zoom Deputy Director Travis Sewards, Will Robertson from the Public Works Department, Transportation Division, George Amun from CSD and I believe Jeff Lindgren as well is available via Zoom. And he's with CSD. With that, I'd like to turn it over to Ms. Reese to make the presentation for the project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed5:56:20

Thank you Miss Plowman. Hello Chair Nelson, members of the board. So the project before you today is on Keysight 3 in the Orgut community and the Planning Commission's recommendations for Project Denial are before you. This project site that's designated as Keysight 3, it's located on the west side of Highway 101 approximately a quarter mile south of Clark Avenue.

It's bounded by the 101 to the east Sunny Hills Mobile Home Park to the north, Ranch Hudson one acre home sites to the west and the undeveloped Solomon Hills to the south. So this slide shows the existing zoning in the area. The Keysight is zoned residentially, it's currently utilized for grazing and there are two existing residential zoning designations on the site.

Those include MRO which is multi-family residential orchid 20 units per acre and RR10 residential ranch at 10 acre parcel size. And the project before you today includes a request to rezone the RR10 property in accordance with the Orchid Community Plan policies for Keysight 3. I'll discuss that in a later slide, and we've gone over that there's some existing mobile home parks and closer to Clark, a smaller lot subdivision and condominiums to the west of Keysight three more five acre ranch huts and one acre lot homes.

Right, a little bit of background on this site and the history of it. OCPR was certified back in 1997. It looked at a project of 212 single family dwellings and about 53 acres of open space on the site in 2009. The board approved the housing element focused rezone program and that amended the land use designation And zoning for eight acres of the site in the center portion of the mesa to residential 20 and MRO.

And that rezone program approved the future development of 160 multifamily townhome units to be constructed by right with a zoning clearance on that site. And the LUDC when it comes to the MRO zoning states that no further environmental review, public hearing or discretionary approval is required for the projects in the MRO zone. So those 160 townhome units are not a part of the proposed project that's before you today.

Although, the proposed vesting tentative tract map that's under your consideration would divide the MRO site into two parcels and identify infrastructure to serve the site. So the project before you that's today, it doesn't include any development in the designated open space of the site. It's limited to the Mesa area. That's where it differs from what was considered earlier by the board back in 2012 The Supervisor Nelson gave some background on, but to give you an overview of what the proposed project would look like 119 single family dwellings would be located on the Mesa area which is shown in orange here.

And it's limited to that area to preserve the natural open space on the site and reduce the project footprint as compared to those previous projects that were analyzed in both the OCP, EIR and the 2012 denial. The reduction of the project footprint is accomplished by clustering the homes. So the lot sizes would range from approximately 3,000 to 13,000 gross square feet and the way that the applicant has designed the project homes with larger lots and single story homes would be located towards the exterior of the project where there's existing single family development Whereas the second story homes would be clustered towards the interior of the site, stepping away from that existing residential development.

The project also includes a dedication of 91 acres of public open space to the county in addition to 22 1⁄2 acres of private open space on-site. The reason that's before you would rezone approximately 130 acres from RR10 to PRD119. That's planned residential development, 119 units. What the OCP or the Orchid Community Plan has to say about that is that the county shall reconsider or shall consider rezoning portions of Keysight 3 to PRD for 125 units when two conditions have been met The first condition is that the open space that's shown in the Orchid Community Plan is dedicated to the county and that's proposed as a part of this project.

The second condition is that the property owner has recorded a written agreement related to school capacity, and there is an agreement between the applicant and the Orchard Unified School District that's been recorded, and that attached to the November 4th 2020 staff report. So the project also includes a general plan amendment that's described in detail in that same staff report I just referenced.

The textual changes here include changing the mentions of Residential Ranchette and RR10 to Plan Development, Open Space and PRD just to reflect the proposed rezone and the project. The other revisions would reflect the availability of multi-use trails rather than just hiking trails. Two development standards would be revised to describe secondary access via Chancellor over an existing easement for public road ingress and egress, rather than Oak Brook.

And the final textual change is to clarify that the bike path would be an off-road bike path We also have a few graphic changes to the Parks, Recreation and Trails map, the PRT map. Those are shown here so green is showing the new trail segments that would be incorporated into the trail system. Yellow is areas that were realigned To better suit the topography of the site, and red is areas of no change.

So a note here is that the trail segment on the southern end of the Keysight 3 parcel, the W1 trail On to the Planning Commission's recommendations. As Ms. Plowman said, the County Planning Commission heard the project a number of times most recently on May 26th of this year and on that date they recommended that the board deny the project based on the inability to make findings pertaining to general community welfare appropriateness of the proposed population density in the PRD portion of the site and compatibility of the project with the surrounding areas.

And the planning commission's reasons for doing so were based on the following items, and these are incorporated into the PC recommended findings for denial as well. Firstly, they stated that the project wasn't consistent with the surrounding area and the proposed density was not compatible with the community. They also stated that in order to ensure neighborhood compatibility in this area, that they would like to see a larger portion of the key site developed with the lower density and a reduction in the amount of designated open space in order to accommodate more housing on the property.

Secondly, they stated that the secondary access route was not firmly established to support the impacts of the project and that the developer did not have a private maintenance agreement in place which is what the Planning Commission had requested at the November 4th 2020 hearing. They also stated at that time that the developer should utilize secondary access that is not along Chancellor Street for example along Oakbrook Lane I should also mention at this point that the applicant's representation provided two comment letters in which they outlined a willingness to amend the project application and propose secondary access along Oakbrook Lane with Chancellor Street as a fallback option.

So to follow the recommendations of the Planning Commission, your board should make the required findings for denial of the project as specified in attachment one to the board letter. Determine that the denial is exempt from CEQA as specified in attachment two to the board letter and take action to deny the project. That completes my presentation and staff is available for questions.

We also have the applicant team, Mr. Matt Mancy as well as his representation, Mr Mark Mannion and Mr Cameron Goodman and representatives from various county departments as Ms Plowman stated. I believe the applicant has also submitted a brief presentation on the project that they would like to give

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

6:07 – 6:1215 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:07:18

All right. So I think we're going to have some questions, but do you want to go to the applicant first? Is that, are we okay with that or anybody having any questions answered now? You good Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:07:29

Well, just the question that came to mind was how, what is the density that has proposed that the PC said was too high of density? Like how many units per acre are we talking about?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:07:50

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Williams, Ms. Reese is going to take a quick look at that and report back.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:07:58

Thanks. All right. You got that already?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:08:13

Chair Nelson, Supervisor Williams works out to approximately 2.83 units per acre so 119 units over 42 acres. I guess eight of those would be MRO so three and a half units per acre.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:08:39

With the MRO zoning can you give me the blend? So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:08:49

Supervisor Williams there's also a cumulatively, there's 160 units over eight acres also on the property.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:08:57

Oh you're talking about the multifamily?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:08:59

Yeah. Chair Nelson members of the board so with all of the units included on the Mesa area the density would be 6.7 units per acre approximately.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:09:16

I think that was the point that the Planning Commission was making

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:09:23

All right, let's go ahead and go to the presentation from the applicant.

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:09:40

Good afternoon Chair Nelson, members of the board. Thanks for hearing us. My presentation is really brief. My name is Matt Mancy. I'm the applicant and the owner and the developer. And Ms. Reese did a really good job of explaining the project, so I'll be really short. So we, as she stated, we've been here for quite awhile. In 2012, the Board of Supervisors told us to kind of go back and re-look at this project.

They told us it was a little too dense or they wanted more of a concentration on the Upper Mesa, and so that's what's before you today. So we have a comment letter that was sent out, as she mentioned. And I was just kind of explaining how we feel the Planning Commission's findings for denial were not supportable and you know that can be read if you want us to go over that we can but I think everybody has seen that it's important to note this staff did recommend approval for this project prior That the Orca Community Plan states.

And so that's the project is before you today, the notable change that Miss Reese mentioned was the secondary emergency access we are willing to move it and we worked with staff to get that moved. So if that's something that the board wishes that we were able to do that and we can move that to Oak Brook Lane. And then the letter also talks about the Housing Accountability Act SB 330 So again, if you have questions about that we're happy to go over that but I don't think it needs to be mentioned right now. So if you can go to that slide that says brief project history.

So the land was purchased in 2003 as I said, we've been at this for quite a while. The MRO was approved in 2009 and then as I mentioned earlier this is kind of the second iteration of the project that was before the Board of Supervisors We had at one point ranchettes down at the Lower Mesa. We were told that those weren't wanted and that we should concentrate, as I said earlier on the Upper Mesa so that is what's before you today.

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:12:08

Next slide please.

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:12:13

So we've been working on this as I said since 2003 finalized and subsequently re-updated the EIR in 2020 So just a little over a year ago to comply with any new mandates and laws. Water rights secured, and then we've complied with all county staff requests. So basically everything that's been asked of us, we've worked really hard to get that done. We moved sewer lines and changed access, and we've worked with the developer to the north, Mr. Gavin Morris in Keyside too to kind of realign our access road through their property And that's the main access I'm talking about.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:12:56

Next slide, please.

6:13 – 6:1914 turns

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:13:01

We worked with six individual neighbors on Oak Brook as I mentioned to get a sewer easement through there. We're also willing, as I mentioned, to put our secondary road through there as well if that be the will of the board. Adjacent landowners we've worked with, we've met many times with the Sunny Hills Local Home Park met with Gavin Morris, and finally we've met with the county supervisors and staff regarding that secondary access instead of Chancellor to Oak Brook.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:13:37

Next slide. So the open space so

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:13:43

we have 138 acres total We're dedicating 80% of that to open space. It's 65% of the 138 is public open space, so that's trails. That's the entire Lower Mesa. I think it should be noted that we're getting... The whole property is 138 acres and so if we're doing 119 units on 138 acres That's about 1.1 units per acre, if you count the whole entire site. Now that's not including the MRO space but I would bump it up only slightly. So we're really talking about a much smaller density than even two units per acre.

Next slide. You saw this already from Ms. Reese, that's the Mesa, the yellow portion. That entire red line portion is the 138 acres which is the entirety of

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:14:42

our property. And then there's the concentration on the upper Mesa next slide. Next slide please.

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:15:01

You can see some of our architectural styles. These are for the homes going in, these are cluster homes, single family on smaller lots and you have farmhouse cottage Monterey and craftsman styles. Next slide. And then this is just some I gives you some idea of what they're gonna look like elevation wise.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:15:22

This is our one story. Next slide please. Craftsmen style next slide These are some of our two stories. Next slide, please. And then

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:15:40

here's some floor plans. This is a floor plan of the one story.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:15:44

Next slide, please. Another floor plan for

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:15:49

you. Next slide. This is an example of the cluster layout. As you can see, you have the smaller lots, larger lots towards the mobile home park as Ms. Reese was pointing out and then smaller lots as you go south.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:16:10

Next slide please.

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:16:12

And there's just an idea of the cluster with the floor plans

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:16:15

integrated in.

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:16:18

Next slide. Just a little bit about us. We're the owner and affiliate of SBCARC We're a semi-local developer. We're in Ventura, and we do both single family homes and multifamily buildings. Family owned and operated, and I'm an open door so any questions from staff, public or the board please call me. Next slide. So we believe in this project, we believe it's a good project. That it's actually a really good project and that is the right area and the right property for this kind of development.

It's obviously very low density so just a couple benefits here obviously everybody knows there's tax revenue road realignment provides badly needed housing fees and fees in lieu for affordable It should be noted there's no affordable housing that is being built on either one of these sites. It's all market rate, we're paying fees in lieu for affordable. And then again just a huge dedication of open space, 91 total acres and out of that 22.5 acres is being dedicated to the private open space so homeowners' backyards and private pocket parks and things like that.

Final slide? So yeah, we think this is an exceptional project. County staff had previously recommended it for approval and we don't believe the findings that the Planning Commission came up with were valid and not supportable. We feel it's a good location And finally, the dedication of open space and the trails that are going to connect to the trails to the south is a big public benefit. So that's it. I'm going to be here obviously if you have any other questions, I'm here. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:18:20

All right thank you Mr. Mansi. Any questions from the board at this time? Yeah, I guess i'll start with the questions as a supervisor Hartman reminds me it's my district. um I guess my first question is for. Staff where's the water coming for for this project because it's in again, I know that we're talking about 100 and. 9 units, is that right? 119 units. But it's also as we're going to develop this project out there there's approvals are gonna be happening today that also will lead towards the building of 100 additional 160 units so we're really talking about 279 units on the property and so I know that we're not deciding on whether the MRO happens today but i think we need to make sure That when we make a decision, we need to think about the cumulative impacts and what it's a neighborhood that were potentially approving today.

And so I think that you know, I want to make sure I put that on the record for my colleagues and staff as we go through this. So the water for this project where is that coming from?

6:19 – 6:2521 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:19:30

Chair Nelson, members of the board. Golden State Water Company would be serving this project as well as the eventual project on the MRO zone and there's a supplemental water agreement to purchase 200 acre feet of water that's been executed with the City of Santa Maria which means that there is adequate Thank you, Mr. Mayor and members of the public.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:20:16

I don't think that's accurate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:20:18

They own water from the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:20:19

basin. Right, okay so water that's already in the basin. So there's no new water coming into the basin for this project? So it's an asset that's owned by the city that the project would be accessing and would be retrieved as groundwater right? So existing groundwater will be pumped to serve this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:20:44

Chair Nelson, members of the board. That's correct. There's long term water that's already existing within.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:20:52

Was there any point of consideration? Any kind of recycled water projects or conservation projects that might be able to do that instead of pumping from the basin that we all know is taxed? Is that considered?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:21:10

Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure I completely understand your question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:21:14

well we're talking you know we're talking about the water to feed 300 residences sure so you know where's that going to come from is part of the question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed6:21:23

right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:21:24

and i'm hearing that it's its water the city center has purchased has put into our basin and now it's gonna sell to this development Is what I'm hearing and I'm just asking if that is not the only route. That was available for this project where there are other possible opportunities to create new water for the project like this through some type of conservation project or recycled water project?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:21:49

Mr. Chair, what it sounds to me like is you're asking whether or not the sanitary district actually does a certain level of treatment to well this is this is a way that more water can be developed right? A sanitary district can treat water to a certain level and then they can re-inject that into the groundwater basin so I don't believe that was considered for this particular project

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:22:13

Right. I just know the question questions of water will definitely come up, you know in the community that's often a concern when people see that we're building new houses and then at the same time we're asking for conservation there's this sometimes a mixed message that exists and so that's why i wanted to hopefully flesh that out a little bit Getting back to the trail access piece there, the trails that are going to be a part of this project. I know it's talked about and contemplated as being one of the connecting pieces for the Arca Trail system to get to the property that the board had purchased, I think last year or the year before. Are there other routes to get there but outside this project?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:22:57

Chair Nelson, members of the board. If Mr George Amun is available to speak to the trail system, I think it would be best addressed by him

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed6:23:06

right? It's Mr chair members of the Bourse's Georgia Moon contract park planner for CSD. Currently we're looking into that into the access of that parcel that was purchased. There may be some easements that go off certain roads in Orchid, but actually The county surveyors office and some other offices in the county to look at other avenues as to getting to that parcel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:23:37

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed6:23:37

so what I'm starting at this time is a short answer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:23:39

All right we have gotten partially through there through some various trail licenses from the neighboring property owners, is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed6:23:48

We're looking into that right now through certain parcels to see if we can get some use agreements through them

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:23:56

Okay. And then getting back to the whole clustered environment of these, of the houses and I know we kind of may go to this slide that has the overview, the bird's eye view.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:24:10

Let me see if I can find that one. Slide number... Sorry, slide number six in staff presentation So I see some

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:24:36

parking spots in the northwest corner of the project, some kind of community parking spots. Can you tell me how many parking spots are on this project? Because I don't see a lot of parking. Now, I know we're not trying to develop projects with a lot of parking. That's totally a trend that we're doing and planning but I'm not seeing a lot there just at minimal level. Can you speak to the amount of parking that's available?

6:25 – 6:3018 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:25:04

Chair Nelson members of the board I'm pulling up the parking counts for you right now, but I would like to point out that the majority of the roads here. Also, will allow parking either on one side or both sides, there's a few areas where There's guest parking and trail parking provided in addition to that. And the applicant could speak to the amount of parking that's proposed on the MRO site, but I believe it was in the neighborhood of 300 spots also so let me get the particulars for you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:25:38

Thank you. And as far as the trail parking,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:25:51

if we can get that number as well and we can come back to that. And has that been evaluated as being enough? Is it one of the questions that I have?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:26:02

Chair Nelson members of the board at the amount of parking provided exceeds the minimum required by this own district and each house does have a two car garage as well. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:26:13

but under current rules those garages can be converted to additional living space

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:26:21

Mr. Chair, that's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:26:25

That's part of my concern. Okay, I have a couple questions about you know and again that's kind of the parking kind of feeds into this is how far is the nearest bus stop from this project?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:26:40

Chair Nelson, members of the board. The nearest bus stop is provided on Clark Avenue in Keysight 2 West property. It's a policy in the Orchid Community Plan that requires that and from the nearest residence that would be located on Keysight 3 it's approximately 3500 feet from the furthest residence it would be approximately a mile to that bus stop.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:27:09

Distance to the nearest school?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:27:13

Chair Nelson, members of the board. The nearest elementary school to this site is Ralph Dunlap Elementary and it's approximately 1.6 miles away. When Vintage Ranch is constructed on Keyside 7 there will be access through the other way too which would put Pine Grove within less than two miles of the site as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:27:36

Then how about childcare facilities?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:27:40

Chair Nelson, members of the board. As far as the non-residential childcare centers, the closest facility is approximately 1.9 miles away at the Upward Bound Preschool at the Lutheran Church. There are some residential daycares in the Tiffany Park neighborhood and along Harmony Lane that would be approximately a mile to a mile and a half away from Keysight 3.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:28:06

I guess my last question would be, has there been any evaluation on how this project and the cumulative development will impact the jobs housing imbalance in the county?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:28:22

Mr. Chair, members of the board. These matters are considered as part of the housing element update. So when that site was identified for the MRO and the numbers were considered as part of the arena process jobs housing balance was factored in. This site was identified in the Orkut Community Plan for Residential Development, and the issue of jobs-housing balance was discussed as part of that process and discussed as part of the housing element process back in the early 2000's.

But we have become more and more aware of that and the importance of making sure that we can try to balance that. And as you've noticed in our current RHNA cycle You see that the majority of the housing units were assigned to the southern portion of the county because they have greater level of jobs there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:29:18

I have some editorialization a little later, but those are my questions for now. Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:29:27

So I really just have one question in parts. And that is, what does the county require for the secondary access? Do we look at the easement? Do we look at whether the easement is overburdened or if not do we simply condition it? What do we ask an applicant to provide for the secondary ingress egress?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:29:55

So Mr. Chair, Supervisor Hartman. So typically in a development of this size you would need your primary access and then you would need a secondary ingress and egress for or at least at a minimum egress for safety purposes right? And so the when the project is analyzed we look at the roadways that it would be using and determine whether or not there would be impacts And in this instance, the Environmental Review determined that there would be no significant impacts using our thresholds to roadway facilities and intersections. So does that answer your question?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:30:37

Is there a private road or a gate?

6:30 – 6:3515 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:30:41

Go ahead. Chair Nelson, Supervisor Hartman. So along the secondary access road that's currently proposed which is Chancellor Street there is an existing gate and the fire department in their condition letter and the requirements that they gave for secondary access based on the fire code was at the existing gate structure on Chancellor can remain but it needs to be available for ingress and egress purposes by all residents of Keysight 3

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:31:13

So that pretty much deals with it. I mean, what I think the planning commission was concerned about was that there was an easement but that it would be overburdened by this traffic and so I guess I'm asking for clarification now about that.

CommentVice Mayor John SanchezProposed · by introduction6:31:43

This is Travis Sears. Can you guys hear me? We can. Okay, hi good afternoon Board of Supervisors I think the question with the easement being overburdened was addressed in our review we review all the easements and the paperwork that comes with them and it was determined that the applicant has full use of this easement for the purposes that they have proposed

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:32:12

Thank you very much. So then going to the other, the secondary access that's really the applicant is doing that just as an alternative but isn't legally obligated to do that. Is that

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:32:29

correct? Supervisor Hartman through the chair, that is correct. Okay. I think it is another way to avoid one of the general plan amendment that's requested, right? Because the community plan had identified Oak Brook as the secondary access and they are proposing to change that to Chancellor because they have the easement on that road. I see

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:32:52

yeah thank you. Yeah and if i could like to follow up on that so your community plan was designed and when when That property owned the easement across Chancellor at that time in your community plan. Right? I mean, it's an old easement. I think it's, I think I've read the easement documents. I think it's from the seventies. So I would imagine and for the purposes of the discussion we'll assume that they were there in advance but at that time through that environmental process to happen in a community plan process even though there was an easement that did exist on Chancellor Oakbrook was part of the ARCA committee plan for access to that site is that correct?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:33:41

Mr. Chair, I didn't manage that community plan but I believe that's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:33:46

Well the words are on the paper right? Yeah okay thank you all right and um just to clarify you know because we're using some different terminology for the public so there's things we're going to decide today their general plan of amendments right and those are policy calls legislative acts and then there's also the land use side which is more of a judicial act right so um that's we're kind of combining those two things is that am I understanding this correctly

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:34:09

Mr. Chair, you do have a discretionary project before you and then you have some legislative acts before you that result in changes to the RCOT community plan.

CommentAmy SmithProposed6:34:18

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed6:34:21

And Mr. Chair, members on the board just a couple of clarifications. So when we review an easement for access what we're looking for is just whether or not the applicant has the right for that purpose but we don't adjudicate the private rights of the easement so we don' adjudicate whether or not it's overburdened whereas we might look at impacts of the project as a whole but we're not adjudicating their rights under the easements I did want to clarify that And then I believe there was a question about whether we're required to have primary access and secondary access. There is a development standard in the Oregon Community Plan that requires two routes of ingress and egress for the development, so just want to make that clarification.

Mr. Chair, Supervisors, just clarify that easement is from 1982? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:35:13

All right. Additional questions for you, Supervisor Hartman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:35:15

I always find our position on easements, like I always need clarification on this. So what happens if we go forward and the neighbors would bring a lawsuit to say that it's overburdened?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed6:35:34

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Hartman, that has happened before. And again, it's a private dispute between the parties to the easement

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.826:35:43

Right, but we need the they have to have one. And what if they lose that lawsuit? Then what happens?

6:35 – 6:4125 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed6:35:52

Supervisor Hartman generally what happens is they wouldn't be in compliance with the conditions of their project if it was approved with those as conditions and so they would need to come in for some kind of project amendment before they can move forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:36:08

Thank you any other questions from Supervisor Labadino. Thank you,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.776:36:12

Mr Chair. Yeah I need clarification on that so that raises a really interesting question so they would have an approved project but then there'd be litigation per se let's say there is they lose the litigation so they don't have i mean what once once they received approval from us what stops them from the development at that point? Would a judge issue a stop order or injunction of some type

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed6:36:45

Mr. Chair, members of the board. It depends how it's structured but what I have seen in the past is that it depends on the parties they can seek a stay to the development if they are concerned about it going forward if there is that private dispute going on So it just kind of depends. Yeah, and then sometimes it's incorporated in the project as a whole so we've seen it both ways where there's a private easement dispute going on that could impact another project and sometimes it's wrapped up with the project itself.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.776:37:21

So I'm curious about what the other discussions have been about the alternative access with Oak Brook. And is it just, I mean, I'm understanding folks along Chancellor are upset and I'm probably pretty sure that if you move it to Oak Brook, you're gonna just open another can of worms with folks over there who are upset and I don't know if there's been work done ahead of time. I mean the developers talking about, the applicants talking about And I'm just kind of curious what's the status of that?

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed6:38:24

Mr. Manzi?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:38:26

Chair Nelson,

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:38:29

yeah we haven't had any discussions with any of the neighbors on Oak Brook yet. I've had one cursory discussion with just one his name is Gary Crabtree but it hasn't gone any further than that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:38:47

Mr. Manzi that neighborhood did give the project and a sewer easement is that correct?

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:38:54

Chair Nelson, yes that's correct. We did a sewer easement over the northern portion of Oak Brook.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:39:01

So there has been some cooperative relationship there in the past?

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:39:05

That's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:39:07

That's hopeful thank you. All right any other questions before I go to public comment? Supervisor

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction6:39:13

Hart? Yeah just wanted to add for my ex parte disclosure that I met with Mr. Manzi on September 24th.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:39:20

Thank you Supervisor Williams, you could go to public comment or do you have any questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:39:25

I had one other question. What is the status of the multifamily project?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:39:35

Thank you. Chair Nelson supervisor Williams, so there is a zoning clearance application in for the multifamily development. Um as I mentioned in my presentation, the vesting tentative track map includes a subdivision of that site and also infrastructure provides infrastructure to

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:40:06

So the multifamily is permitted but not built, but needs this other project to go forward?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:40:16

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Williams, it's got a land use clearance submitted and it's a ministerial process, but it is dependent on the lot lines that are going to be created by this project through the map and the infrastructure. That's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:40:32

Let me ask a question on that, because I think it's important for the discussion here. So that zoning took place in 2009? So that's 12 years ago?

CommentGeneral Public CommentProposed6:40:40

Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:40:41

And at that time they could have moved forward with because it was it is a ministerial development with recording the map to accomplish that and some of the additional infrastructure.

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:40:53

Mr Chair, they could have. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:40:56

All right. Thank you. Right. So let's go ahead and go to public comment, Madam Clerk.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:41:04

We have six requests to speak on this item. And we'll begin here in Santa Maria with Judy Burch, followed by Bill Brown.

6:41 – 6:468 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed6:41:32

I am not happy with the density. I will first tell you that I live in Sunny Hills, and my biggest concern is that when it comes through Keysight 2 down to the east of Sunny Hills, I know the development itself is south of that but it's going to come alongside the north part of Sunny Hills to get there right? Anyway, I don't think there's enough room between the freeway and Sunny Hills to accommodate a road that would have a whole ton of people using it really close to where we are. And I haven't heard anything about a wall being built for the noise impact of that.

That's my biggest concern as far as the changing of the views. The two stories bothers me a little bit. I couldn't tell if the larger lots just to the south of Sunny Hills have two stories or not, but if they did that would destroy the views. And oh how high would the wall be? If that would be put in it really needs to be and yeah, the traffic is the biggest thing coming alongside I mean, already we have a difficult time getting in and out of ours with the new way they structured the street lines and everything. And I think it's just going to be a big mess. So I'll leave you with that.

That's enough. Thank you very much for listening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:43:12

Thank you for being here.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:43:14

Our next speaker is Bill Brown to be followed by David Hassett.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:43:23

Hello,

CommentBill BrownProposedself-stated6:43:24

I'm Bill Brown. So, I live off of Chancellor on Hamilton. So when they are proposing the secondary access there they say emergency secondary access but I believe it's full time emergency access. I am glad that they're looking at Oh, Brooke now to go inside with the 4K community plan. But I do want to bring up one point when they were bringing up the density levels, I believe they were including in some of the open space so that 119 homes as far as I can tell is actually being built on 9.3 acres leaving about 12 and a half homes per acre.

So I wanted to bring up that point. Behind that Chancellor Gate, we only have 11 homes. So our roads really aren't built to accommodate this type of level. So I believe that's all. Thank you Mr. Brown.

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:44:59

We will now stay in Santa Maria with David Hassett and then we will go to Zoom for Patrick Sheehy

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:45:06

Thank you very much. Over these 119 acres and break it down. Bottom line is like he's saying, it's, it's like 12 homes per acre plus then we have the MRO, which is another 160 units. So we're talking over 500 cars going out basically right next to Sunny Hills right along the freeway We have a lot of people on the sidewalks with no sidewalks. They haven't even got approval to go to the light. There is supposed to be no light because Keysight 2 is supposed to put in the roadway and pay for the light and all that.

Where is Keysight 3? He's not being responsible for any We are trying to work with Keysight too, to even get it off our north fence. So it's in the middle of their property. So we'd like you guys at least postpone it and I'd love for you guys to come down and I can show you the list of things that there's issues with this project is about not just density, there's multiple issues. So I'd love to have you guys come by and meet with me there at Sunny Hills. And I'd love that.

Until a later date. Thank you for your time.

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentAmy SmithProposed6:46:44

Thank you, Mr Hassett.

6:46 – 6:529 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:46:48

We will now go to zoom with Patrick Sheehy to be

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:46:50

followed by Todd Wilson. Mr Sheehey, go ahead and unmute.

CommentPatrick SheeheyProposedself-stated6:47:00

Yes hi my name is Patrick Sheehey I was born here in Santa Maria lived here all Property which is directly adjacent to Keysight 3, to the west. We bought it about 30 years ago and we built a house about 25 years ago. I'm basically opposed to the project because of... The Keysight 3 project because of what it would do to Chancellor. When I moved out here, it was mostly a dirt road and it was in about, oh, about the early 2000's after we saw the Orchid Community Plan Show that we weren't going to be used for any kind of high density traffic that we pitched in about $80,000 between the neighbors and us to build a road out here.

And I don't see any plan to have being compensated for that. When we built the road, the guy asked us how many trips a day do you think you're going to have? And we said well probably about 50 or so and now they're talking about several hundred. So i just i don't know what the plan is as far as a maintenance agreement is but it's just not gonna work on this road out here. It crumbles after a few years with just the light amount of traffic that we have on it.

The other thing is I want to make Gate was put in after we saw the plan for Oak Brook to be used for secondary access. So, we went ahead and had the gate built. The fire department says well you can keep the gate but it has to be used for ingress and egress. Well then what's the purpose of a gate if anybody can go through it? So, it's basically going to have to be torn down so that's basically my opposition to it.

I would be more in favor of having Oakbrook being used for secondary access because They plan on building a bridge right directly east of me over a creek, which is Blue Line Creek and it's got sensitive habitat in it. And I'm gonna have traffic dumping in right next to my house right there several hundred trips a day. So that's my opposition to it. I wanna make one last comment that Mr. Mancy and his father, I guess they've owned this property since 2003. That's a long time.

I've never once been contacted by any of them or anybody of his company there to kind of discuss my issues since I'm going to be obviously the most impacted by it. And, um, I think that's where a lot of this angst and kind of opposition is coming from the neighborhood is just lack of communication in a civil way. So thank you very much for your time.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:49:46

Thank you Mr. Sheehy

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:49:47

We will remain on zoom for Todd Wilson to be followed by Jason Gill, who is our final speaker.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:49:58

Mr Wilson when you're ready unmute.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed6:50:02

Can you hear me now

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:50:03

we can?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed6:50:04

Thank you. Mr Chairman and members of the board, I recommend denial of this Orchid Keysight 3 development plan. Today's Planning Commission findings for denial actually refute earlier Keysight 3 hearing representations of the County P&D in my view casting serious doubt on P&DS credibility and reliability. Keysight 3 development plan is one of four general plan amendments of the Orchid Plan Area presented to Planning Commission in roughly fall of 2020.

The yawning gap between the prior P&D staff report and this Keysight 3 hearing findings of denial reflects similar credibility challenges as seen in each of the most recent general plan amendments. The findings of denial Are your reliable resource. and should carry the greatest weight in your conclusions. Three public comments that hit home to me in prior Keysight 3 hearings tell me planning and development is turning its back on the interests, and well-being of citizens of the Orchid Plan area.

One commenter said P&D has got to stop acting as agent for the applicant. A county fire marshal commented that this property of Keysight three is in a high fire hazard area And we are losing cities. I recall the applicant commenting that he had done everything asked of him by P and D. He was clearly feeling betrayed by the reasonable community and planning commissioner critical thought in questions. Why is P&D so willing to circumvent public policy and community expectations?

It is my view that for some time, Orchid Plan Area has incurred poor planning administration. Poor planning practices are prevailing. It's chronic and both applicant and community suffer. I suggest the Orkut plan area is desperately in need of the old Orkut Advisory Group, or better yet an elected advisory council to include citizen oversight of the intent of Orkutt community plan blueprint including health and safety matters.

Orchid area planning processes are burdening vested neighbors and community members. I'm hearing neighbors who say they are considering moving in response to what appears egregious and unreasonable administration of our plan. Please deny this Keysight 3 application, it's neither consistent nor compatible quality of life matters. Thank you for listening.

6:52 – 6:5913 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:52:57

We will now go to our final speaker, Jason Gill.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:53:00

Mr. Gill? Are you on mute?

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:53:13

And Jason we've unmuted you on our end if you can unmute on your end then you can provide your comments.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:53:28

Mr. Gill, you need to unmute so we can hear you.

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction6:53:37

And if you are on your computer there should be a pop-up window that is asking you to unmute yourself. If you are on a cell phone and on your mobile device it should also be asking you to unmute doesn't look like you're using your phone.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.686:53:57

All right,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:53:59

that's unfortunate. OK, well let's go ahead and I think at this time give the opportunity for Mr. Gill? No, not there. All right, let's give Mr. Mansi an additional opportunity to provide additional input. Mr. Mansi, you or your project team would like to make any additional comments?

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated6:54:24

Chair Nelson, members of the board, Yeah, just to respond to a few of the speakers regarding the primary access through Keysight too. We have been working with Keysight 2 and Sunny Hills to realign that. Realign that access to where it goes through the middle of the property and not along the perimeter. So not so close to the sunny hills mobile home park we do have the easement along We're working with and are willing to realign that towards the middle.

I think we're just waiting on Sunny Hills to actually sign the easement. Another point that was brought up was there are single story homes along the perimeter of sunny hills, and that was also in Miss Reese's presentation as well, as they step back away from the community. And then also there is a signal going in on Clark, and we are contributing monetarily to that as well.

We have an agreement in place for that. And then with regards to the secondary access, the traffic study identified that that secondary access on Chancellor would only account for about 10% of the overall traffic of the project. With the main traffic going through our primary access which lines up directly into Clark Avenue, which is where the freeway entrance is.

And then just in response to Mr. Sheehy, I can't speak for my father but we have had conversations with Catherine and trying to work out a maintenance agreement on that road and we're still open to doing that so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:56:09

that's all I have to say thank you. Thank You Mr. Mansi and then back to staff Ms. Plowman

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:56:16

I'm going to turn it over to Ms. Reese and she has a couple of responses.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed6:56:20

Thank you, Ms. Plowman. Chair Nelson, members of the board, I just wanted to get into some of the details of what was mentioned here for clarity's purpose. So one of the items that was important to the residents of the Sunny Hills Mobile Home Park was that there be a safety barrier or wall So this was brought up at the planning commission hearing as well and there definitely could be a wall constructed there if that was in the interest of the board. We covered it In the memo dated, March 30 2021 outline some options for what could go there.

And I think Mr Mansi touched on this but all of the lots that are adjacent to existing residences would have to be a single story it's a condition of the project. Including the ones that are abutting the existing mobile home park. And then there's a landscape buffer placed in between there, and also the backyards are immediately abutting that landscape buffer to provide additional distance from those residences and step back the height of the building so that their view sheds are preserved there.

Let's see. As far as the roadway next to the Sunny Hills mobile home park, Mr. Hassett and Mr. Mancey I think both touched on this but there were discussions of an easement renegotiation and tentative agreement between all three parties involved there Mr. Simonian, the owner of Keysight 2, the owners of Keysight 3 and the HOA and the owners of the mobile home park there.

And essentially the project works with either alignment All parties are interested in the renegotiated alignment just because it enables development of Keysight 2. It steps it away from the mobile home park, everyone likes that alignment as compared to the existing one. But unfortunately there hasn't actually been a recorded new easement there that would step the road away though we've done the analysis both ways so I think that covers everything for staff responses.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:59:04

Right, thank you. And again as being the supervisor represents area. I'll take the first or is there any additional questions from board? Let's just go there first before we Supervisor Williams, do you have any questions before we go into deliberations?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:59:26

Just the different numbers being bandied around about density of the project. For the project under consideration what is the density of the project in units per acre

6:59 – 7:1523 turns

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction6:59:47

Mr. Chair, Supervisor Williams I think the issue we're having is the fact that the residential development is clustered on the Mesa. The site is rather large so I guess your question is what is the density based on the size of the parcel because that's normally how you would measure it? And I think Ms. Reese said it was around two units to the acre, is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:00:20

But there are 3,000 square foot lots right?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:00:23

So they're very small lots in their cluster.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:00:25

Right

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:00:25

that's the idea with this site right? That's what was envisioned in the Orcutt Community Plan is that you would have development on the Mesa and you would have this open space down below so yes if you were just going to look at the mesa the density would be higher but that's not the entire

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:00:42

site. Is the area that's below the mesa that environmentally sensitive area

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed7:00:52

Chair Nelson, members of the board. It's both environmentally sensitive and it's designated open space.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:00:58

Yeah okay so it's not really developable anyway is that would be very difficult?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:01:05

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:01:06

Okay all right. Supervisor Williams does that satisfy your questions to this point?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed7:01:14

Yeah I guess the other question is you know In the planning commission discussions, did some of the discussion seem to veer towards the multifamily project as this discussion seems to have veered toward it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed7:01:46

Chair Nelson, Supervisor Williams. I think there's always been an interest in the MRO portion of the site based on the public comment received and it was brought up at the Planning Commission hearings as well.

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:02:02

And Mr. Chair, just to clarify to get to the bottom of the question about the area that's developable on the Mesa. So if you just looked at the development with the PRD zoning which would be the single family it's 3.5 units per acre. When you add the MRO in it ends up being 6.7 units per acre.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.687:02:28

Thank you. All right, so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:02:36

I think I'll kick it off here. I think obviously from my questions, I've had some concerns about this project. This is my first year on the board but I previously served for eight years as chief of staff and I've heard about this site over and over again and have had many conversations with the community members. Sunny Hills, for everybody's benefit, Sunny Hills is a affordable housing project for seniors, low-income seniors.

It's a great property to do some amazing things over there, big part of our community. So I've had lots of conversations about it and there's been a lot of concerns about what's been done here. You know the Orchid Community Plan was kicked off in 1997 Coincidentally enough, that was the same year I graduated from Righetti High School. And a lot's changed since then, not just in Orkut but in our state.

The things that we know now with planning have evolved significantly in the last 25 years. We look at things differently through different lenses and what was done in 1997 versus what was done in 2009 and then where we are today. I think we need to deal with where we're at today, and where we're at today, this project is not an infill project. This project's a sprawl project.

This project is on the edge of town, and cumulatively it's gonna add 289 units on the edge of our community And I mean, we keep talking about job housing imbalance. These are all just locations for people to drive down to jobs in Santa Barbara because we don't have the jobs to support the extra 300 units there in the Orchid area. If the plan is for the county to make Orchard just a bedroom community for Santa Barbara or Santa Maria then approval of this project satisfies that.

As a representative of that community, as someone that's deeply invested in that community. I know we want more for our community. You know and even these houses you know they asked us questions about child care facilities schools and bus stops. These things are, I mean it's a mile away from the nearest bus stop. That's sprawl and it's almost the definition of sprawl. The apartment units in good planning should be an infill project. It should be something that's near public transit. And that's why all those different rules are coming down from the state because we want to put those things along arteries. And yes, it's in proximity to the 101 but still a mile walk to get to the nearest bus stop You know, we're having this conversation about this deficit of childcare facilities.

We're just going to add more to our community without being thoughtful on that. These kids are gonna have to walk two miles to get to school and I grew up in Orchard. And I was within a half mile to elementary schools. And that's where you have community. I think that this is, if anybody had ever paid attention during the whole MRO process through the arena process back in 2009 it was put on this property hastily.

It was a last minute decision and in ORCA got two of them. We've got one at Keysight 30, it's along Bradley Road which was a true infill project right between two housing developments right by elementary schools right by public transit and this one has been Somewhat of a afterthought. When I first met with Mr. Manzi, Mr. Franklin, sorry, Mr. Ernie Mansi in 2013 they lamented what the county had done to them. They had given them this MRO property and that they wanted us to help them move it and as soon as I offered to do that, they pulled that back and said no, no we don't want that moved.

Yes its zoned that but you know That's what should be there. Right now we're going through a regional housing process and this is just kind of a side note not to deal specifically with this project, but I think we should reconsider that zoning on that parcel for that donut if you will. Things like trails, I know those are spaces there. Those are spaces that are important to our community.

I've heard from our trail advocates we need more trails has been a huge thing during the pandemic. We are hard at work at acquiring more access. I think we're gonna be able to easily get to the property that we purchased as a county through other means without this project although surprisingly, I'm not here today to ask my colleagues to deny this project I'm actually asking my colleagues today to join me in asking the, to potentially continue on this item and asking the applicant to rethink a few things just like the binder that some of the neighborhood had to rethink Keysight 3. The Oak Brook access is a have-to on this project It was a policy that was in the Orchard Community Plan. We wanna keep talking about what's contemplated Orchid Community Plan, it was contemplated for Oak Brook.

If you viewed either one of those access points there's no comparison on convenience. Oak Brook is superior on vehicles miles traveled, it's superior in every way and unfortunately the project applicant has gone for the path of least resistance to what they already owned Like I mentioned before, they already owned Chancellor easement prior to our community plan. But the community plan recognized that would have been inappropriate at that location and pushed for Oakbrook. So my hope is that we can continue this project, ask the applicant to go back and work on getting the Oakbrooke easement.

I also would like them to maybe relook at some of the density here. I think we should as a frankly, as a board look if there's a better opportunity for MRO property. I like the cluster homes but it's cumulative. I mean that's really what we're talking about. It's accumulative impact on this project. I'd like to see us potentially move that MRO zoning. I would be glad to see the applicant I would like to amend his project to have this whole cluster concept throughout the entire Mesa.

And I think that would be a project that would reduce the density, have access through Oak Brook and be something that the community could be proud of and that the developer could build and have a lot of support. I haven't had any support for this project as is in my community at any level besides from Thank you, Mr. Chair.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.777:09:47

Well it brings up an interesting question about moving the MRO and if that's possible, if it's legal, and even if he wanted to do it, if it's something we could do. Because anybody that drives by that location knows that does not fit there. You don't want to drive into, here's the gateway to your community and you've got an MRO building standing. That's the first thing right after you see a cattle open space.

And I'm glad that happened a year before I got here so that... But I do think that area needs to be developed. So it's, you know, I understand that people have lived in neighborhoods. It's so weird because I came down my coming home from out of town yesterday. I was driving down my street and I was like man, it was the middle of night and I was like there didn't used to be this many cars on my street and it bothered me. And I'm like things do change. That's just the way things are however That piece of property is going to change the landscape of Orchid and what it's gonna be like forever. So, it has to be done right.

So putting 290 units there 280 units whatever it is if regardless of how they're set up whether they're single-family homes or if it's an MRO it has to be done right I think there's a possibility to get this right there And I'm not saying it's from a lack of willpower on Mr. Mansi's part or if it's blocking from the community's part, I think a project can be made and Mr. Sheehy probably hit it on the head when he said we've just got to communicate. For me, Chancellor, whether they have the access right there or not have the easement I've been up and down that road. I've looked at that road, and it's just not capable of what we're asking it to do.

The reason why I asked about Oak Brook is because I understand there's gonna be some community resistance on Oak Brook as well once folks find out that maybe that's the new alternative but it's just a much better project going that way. I would support asking the applicant to work out the different access, tweak the density And I think this might be an outside the box type of request to talk about moving the MRO. But in this particular location, under these circumstances, I think that Keysight actually calls for something to be looked at.

Look outside the box, what are our different options? What can we do? 2009 when you said 19, When did you graduate from high school? You made me feel old.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:12:42

97. Woo,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.777:12:43

okay. So 97 yeah. I feel old now but you said things are different in 97. Things are different in 2009 right we start thinking about 2009 doesn't sound that long ago it's 12 years ago and and I do have feelings for Mr. Mansi as far as you know I understand that Some people are upset because you've got now the houses are clustered over here. Originally had them spread out all over the location and we asked him to move them over to a certain location they did there's, you know with when you have a project on your hands for 15 years Decision-makers change places as well. The community changes what they'd like to see and what they wouldn't like to see.

I'm not blaming him, but I think he's got the ability to come in with a project that the whole community can get behind and on that particular piece of property, that's exactly what we need so I would second your motion when you get around to doing that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:13:48

Great thank you Supervisor Lavenino. Any other comments from Supervisor Hart?

ElectedWilliamsSupervisorProposed · by introduction7:13:54

I can support a continuance to give time to work out the easement. I don't know about finding receiver site for the multifamily residential. That seems like a really difficult task, but secondary access to make sure that is buttoned up as it is now, the proposal from the applicant is conditional if we can work It will take some time to work with the neighbors to make that happen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:14:27

Thank you, Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.827:14:31

Did staff have something they wanted to add to this?

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:14:36

Mr. Chair, members of the board I think it's important to have a conversation about what's possible with the MRO and that property was identified as a way to meet our obligations for the arena numbers that were received at that time during that cycle. And so an alternative site would have to be identified We are embarking on our housing element currently. We have to be done with that housing element by February 2023, so that could be considered in that context when we're looking at where we need the housing designation, the land to be rezoned or changed to meet not only our old numbers but our current numbers.

7:15 – 7:225 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:15:25

Right, thank you. And I'll have something else to say about that but I'll let you rather Hartman chime in as well.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.827:15:35

Well, I do believe quality of life is very important and compatibility is very important. To me, it's mobile homes on one side. It's smaller lots single family on another side and then it's ranchettes on the south side. So having the cluster development to me doesn't seem overly dense or incompatible. I like the cluster idea, I think there are many people who would like to have the advantages of open space property but not have the responsibility of having to keep it up I like the feathering idea where it's, it's less dense on the outside and it gets more dense as it comes in.

So I and I very much like the open space in the trails, the private trails and then the other open space that would be available to the community. So it seems like an asset to me we did hear I think about the mobile home people would like a wall and I had a question which with the applicant be willing to put in that wall It seems they've been waiting a long time to wait until we get our housing element and deal with, I mean that seems like, I'm not sure that's fair to ask.

So I'm still wrestling with this one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:17:12

I appreciate that thank you Supervisor Hartman. Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed7:17:16

Well I could support a continuance for the purposes of the question of the easement and And I agree wholeheartedly with you, Supervisor Nelson on your philosophical backdrop. You know, I have long said that North County housing production shouldn't be shifting the responsibilities that we have in the South to house our middle and working class. But reducing the density of the project just makes that worse. I mean, if you really believe this is sprawl then reducing the density will just make that worse not better and I just can't come to the conclusion that three and a half units per acre is dense housing You know I think what's really going on, I mean at some level it's obvious because we've talked about it is the attempt to change a ministerial process for the multifamily by affecting this discretionary process.

And I'm uncomfortable with that. You know, most of the time we talk about well I guess I'll just say that in my view there shouldn't be any housing. That's where I'm with you philosophically but there is a zone for allocation that our predecessors determined on that spot and if we take places where they're Where there's ministerial processes and leverage it, then we're committing the sins of our predecessors of making the P&E process opaque and unpredictable for anybody who enters it.

So I guess if the motion was constrained for the purposes of the wall and easement, I could support it. Even though I don't think there should be any housing there, frankly. I don't think that it is right or legal for us to leverage a ministerial process with this discretionary process.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:20:11

I do appreciate the comments from my colleagues and duly noted. And maybe I'm asking for too much by saying, you know, let's let's move the MRO. Let's let's I just I guess my direction that I would be or my motion would be. is to go ahead and discontinue it based on giving them more time to acquire the access over Oak Brook. I would, I guess I will retract my request on the MRO but I will ask on a personal level to consider that as we move forward with our housing element update.

If the opportunity presents itself for this board, I would like the opportunity to have that conversation. I do think there are ultimately better sites for housing and dense housing that does not add to some of the problems philosophically that we are wrestling with even where this project is. Keysight 3 is one thing. It's right there on the 101, easy pathway down to Santa Barbara. I mean, I really think in Orchid Hour we should be looking at our housing closer to 135 and Highway 1 so that we can help feed hopefully the commercial space development at Vandenberg. Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. I want to start by saying thank you to all of our board members for their hard work over the last couple of weeks. We have had a number I would be open to that, knowing that this is contemplated.

But I think that's something that really eliminates most of the neighborhood incompatibility issues. And I think if we can get that accomplished and You know, a big win for our community. And so that would be my motion is to continue this item and ask the applicant to amend the plan to acquire the Oak Brook access and easement prior to bringing it back to the board for approval.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

7:22 – 7:2822 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.777:22:34

I'll second that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:22:35

OK, I don't have a date certain on that because I think it's going to take some time for them to have those conversations

CommentBill BrownProposed · by introduction7:22:42

So Mr. Chair, I think it would be helpful to get feedback from the applicant about timing that they think that they'll need. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:22:51

right, Mr. Mansi, how long do you think you would need to begin to have a conversation with the neighborhood and acquire that?

CommentMatt MancyProposedself-stated7:23:02

Chair Nelson, members of the board, I don't know. I would need to kind of circle back with you on that and I can kinda kick it Our council, who's waiting here too.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.687:23:14

His name is Cameron.

CommentAmy SmithProposed7:23:17

Mr. Goodman?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed7:23:20

Good afternoon Chair Nelson, members of the board. Thank you for your consideration of this project. I think we've made it pretty clear in our comment letter and Matt has done a good job- Mr. Goodman can you speak up a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:23:34

little bit? Can you speak up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed7:23:37

I'm sorry. Can you hear me okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:23:39

That's better. Want to start over?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed7:23:43

I'm sorry, I might have a bad internet connection. We've made fairly clear in our comment letters and Matt Mancy has explained fairly well in his comments this afternoon that we believe the project should be approved as is. We've provided a pretty reasonable alternative for the secondary access that would allow the board to approve the project now as proposed with two alternatives for secondary access.

If they don't get secondary access, despite reasonable efforts to negotiate with the Oak Brook neighbors. They can fall back to the Chancellor secondary access. So we would request that that be the board's determination today and on that note you know there have been some Questions about overburdening the easement on Chancellor and what are the impacts of the gate that's been installed on Chancellor.

And as county staff has correctly noted, that's a private dispute between the applicant and the neighbors who hold the servient easement. That issue would be litigated in future and we feel confident that our client would prevail in the overburdening of the easement issue and might end up having to have the gate removed. So we don't think that should be a consideration.

And the maintenance issue on Chancellor is also You know, very easily remedied by a negotiation of a maintenance easement between the neighbors and SP Clark, the project owner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:25:18

Thank you Mr Goodman I think the question was specifically on how much time you would need to work on that, and I do sympathize with that supervisor Hartman

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.827:25:29

I would like to ask County Council again about the easement and what legitimate authority we have in this situation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed7:25:43

Mr Chair and Supervisor Hartman What I'm hearing the concerns are about the access, not so much the easement over the easement if an applicant has. We look at what the applicant rights to applicant has on the easement for the purpose that's stated. But again, we don't adjudicate overburdening or anything beyond that. You have broad discretion to interpret the general plan consistency as well as amendments. So this project does include a number of amendments to the general plan, that being one of them.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:26:34

I'll speak to that too. My reason for Oak Brook isn't because of the conflict necessarily with the Chancellor neighborhood. That's a benefit but Oak Brook is the superior access point and again we're talking about a project that has some deficiencies and so this is a major one that can be resolved And a benefit is it actually reduces a lot of conflicts with its neighbors. It's not the reason why, you know the whole reason it is a reason why I would support the Oak Brook access over the Chancellor access and so there's less vehicle miles travel, it's a better spot

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.827:27:09

I'm persuaded by both. Okay, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:27:11

you. Ms Van Molen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed7:27:12

Mr Chair and members of the board my recommendation is if you'd like to continue this today that you're sending the applicant back to look at alternatives whether that's for access we talked about density some of the other concerns have been raised to see if they're interested in amending the project and then then come back and report to your board on that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:27:34

okay I think that's reasonable so So my motion would be, you can help me out with this, would be to continue the item that allowed the applicant to evaluate some of the things that was heard at the board today and to evaluate and research on whether that's possible. And then they'd come back to us and we'd set a time to hear back from here at the board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed7:28:00

Mister chair, yes that sounds good. Since we're not doing to a date certain I believe that means the project needs to be renoticed but planning could work with the applicant on when they're ready to return to your board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:28:11

Okay. That would be my motion. And that would be my second. Okay. Is there any further discussion at this time? All right seeing none Madam Clerk will you please call the roll.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. And that would be my second. Okay. Is there any further discussion at this time? All right seeing none Madam Clerk will you please c
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino. Aye. Supervisor Williams. Aye Supervisor Hart. Aye Supervisor Hartman. Aye Chair Nelson. Aye

7:28 – 7:292 turns

CommentTodd WilsonProposed · by introduction7:28:31

Motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:28:33

thank you all right that concludes our meeting we are now adjourned to a special meeting this Thursday that will be to me read my script All right, we are now adjourned to a special meeting of the Board of Supervisors on Thursday, October 14th in Santa Barbara to hold a closed session to consider one public employee appointment of the Director of the Department of Behavioral Wellness. Thank you.