BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 January 11, 2022

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:062 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:35

Good morning. I'll call the order of the January 11th, 2022 meeting in the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Will the clerk please call the roll?

Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Supervisor Williams. Here. Supervisor Hart here. Supervisor Hartman here. Supervisor Lavinino here and Chair Nelson here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈17s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:52

at this time please stand and join me in pledging allegiance to the flag. Ready again.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States

We're going to open today's meeting in honor of a member of the county family who passed away this last week. Joseph Joey DeAnta was a member of our Santa Barbara County Fire Department. Joey, before joining the county worked at San Luis Ambulance AMR, Santa Barbara County Sheriff as a medic and dispatcher, Caltrans, and Mercy Air. Joey just this last year got his dream job to be a firefighter in his home county, Santa Barbara County He tragically lost his life in a skiing accident this last week. And I thought it appropriate today that we open this meeting in his honor and with a moment of silence.

Thank you. I know that the department and the county will be working on doing some kind of other ceremony for remembering Joey in the coming weeks, and from the stories I've heard he will be truly missed. At this time it is my pleasure to call to order the 2022 Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. This marks the 172nd convening of the Santa Barbara County's highest legislative body.

I will now accept nominations for the position of Chair and Vice-Chair for 2022 of the Board of Supervisors, who also sits as the board directors of the Water Agency, the Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District, and the Laguna Sanitation District and other special districts. I will entertain a motion.

0:06 – 0:136 turns

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction6:23

Supervisor Hart? I'll move to nominate Supervisor Hartman as chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:28

And let's go ahead and take in one motion. I'll also take it for Vice Chair.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction6:32

Okay, and as Vice Chair Supervisor Williams. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:37

you. Can I get a second? I'll second that. That's a second from Supervisor Labanino. Thank you. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. I'll also take it for Vice Chair. Okay, and as Vice Chair Supervisor Williams. Thank you. Can I get a second? I'll second that. That
Show transcript
Supervisor Williams. Aye. Supervisor Hart. Aye. Supervisor Hartman. Aye Supervisor Labanino. Aye and Chair Nelson. Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:57

Motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:59

Thank you. Before we go ahead and change seats, I just have a few remarks as outgoing chairman. You know what a difference a year makes when I was sworn into office and took was elected by my colleagues to service chair. We're in the height of the pandemic record cases shutdowns lockdowns panic And sure enough, a year later we're not far from that. Again all time highs colleges are online Zoom meetings are restarting but this is a very different time in a different place than we were a year ago while case rates are high hospitalization and deaths are moderate to low.

We now have a vaccine as available to everyone with a shred of risk and Omicron is not Delta or Alpha We know so much more about the virus, from prevention to therapeutics and treatments. A lot has changed. I look forward to this time a year from now when we have settled in and learned to live with COVID. First of all, I'd like to thank my colleagues for putting your trust in me this year as your chair.

No small role for a first-year supervisor. I'd be lying to say that I didn't enjoy the opportunity. It's been a great opportunity to learn and interact with the public, staff and you. It was an opportunity to get to know my colleagues in a different way. The chair is not the charismatic leader of the board but a facilitator, a manager, a captain. While the five of us may have radically different views on or approaches to a wide variety of issues that come before us together we are a team We embody and represent the 450,000 residents of our county.

We are their voice. In the height of the pandemic we as a team have done a lot. We've had some wins this year. We hired two capable and impressive women to lead two of our most important departments Miss Rachel Van Molen for County Council and Tony Navarro in behavioral illness Possibly our most important decision of this last year was extending the contract for another four years of our true leader, Mono Miyasato.

We also negotiated approved contracts with 99% of our non-public safety employees, Local 620, Local 721, engineer technicians, civil attorneys and district attorneys. These were modest contracts that gives us budget certainty and labor peace for the foreseeable future. We passed a balanced budget of over $1 billion. We maintained the county's important role as a social safety net, but grew our investment in infrastructure, recreational opportunities and deferred maintenance.

We opened our county's two largest capital projects in county history, the Tahecus Resource Recovery Project, as well as the Northern Branch Jail. As well as many other projects that we kicked off from fire dispatch to probation and public safety radios. And because of the investment of this board, as well as the foresight for others from others. For the first time in more than a decade, the county's PCI pavement condition index went up not only have we bent the curve, we've angled it upward.

Other things to celebrate. SB CSRS under the leadership of Greg Levin and our representatives, Supervisor Lavinino saw our percentage, our funded percentage go up significantly from 74.3 to 69.5 cutting our unfunded liabilities in half for $1.1 billion down to just a mere 470 million still quite a bit but we're on our way We've also tackled homelessness in a serious way The only special topic meeting that I called this chair was to address this issue.

And we got a chance for the first time to have a comprehensive approach to dealing with homelessness in our county. We've taken an opportunity to lean on state and federal funding, as well as renewed our focus on those that are unsheltered. But I'm not looking at this last year and these accomplishments with rose colored glasses But with an eye to the future, the challenges this county face.

Are rarely accidental? It's a job of the five of us to look to the future to anticipate plan and act to perfect the investment responsibility we have as leaders of this great County. As I move over a seat or two. To become just a regular supervisor, I will miss the role as your chair by look forward to the chance to work. Work on while never losing focus of serving the entire county. I look forward to serving and advocating for my hometown of Orchid, and the other unincorporated areas of Northern Santa Barbara County as well as serving this growing city of Santa Maria.

In closing one of my proudest accomplishments was never having to use this gavel. The other is that this board has not been a partisan board And as the world around us seems to get more and more divided, we've done for the most part a good job of staying united and focused on the goals of delivering local government to our constituents. I look forward to continuing that work.

It is not an accident that we do the things that we do. Thank you. So at this time, I'm going to go ahead and pass on the gavel Chairman-elect, or Chairman Hartman.

0:13 – 0:215 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed13:03

Congratulations.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8113:59

Thank you so much Supervisor Nelson. You've had a wonderful year as chairman and it's been a very demanding year, and thank you to all my board colleagues. It's really a great honor to serve with you. A number of people have remarked on How well our board seems to get along, the collegiality. At so many levels of government we don't see this. We can't assume mutual regard and I think ours stems from many things. It's really a highly engaged community that demands the best of us.

It is a county organization, employees, unions, department heads and a fabulous CEO that always strive for better I believe it also relates to something called organizational culture, the shared values, expectations and practices that guide us. Every day we show up, engage and work with each other to make those values real. But how is it that we work with each other?

On the board, we owe a lot to Supervisor Lavinino's wit. To Supervisor Hart's optimism. To Supervisor Nelson's seek something for everyone solutions and Supervisor Williams' fearlessness. It also comes down just to the little courtesies that weave us all together. Take the gavel that Supervisor Nelson just gave to me Yes, it's a peaceful transition of power but that rests on an informal rule. The chair rotates in a certain specified order and that isn't written down anywhere.

And the gentleman here could well have voted differently today. And indeed in some local governments even in our county that happens. A majority can muscle it and that can create resentment and ill will Whether it be committee assignments, budget compromises or how we speak about each other in public. It's these little courtesies the sum of informal rules the things that anthropologists study that are really significant in creating a sense of camaraderie.

It doesn't mean that when our views differ we don't fight hard But we do fight fairly and honestly. And that has been especially important in these trying times of the trifecta, we have impacts first of the pandemic second of climate change with intensified fire flood and drought. And finally, the recognition of deep seated inequities that are aggravated by the first two.

These have tested our nation in ways we did not have the imagination for, and it has driven a wedge between people and eroded trust in government. Many of us feel like life as we knew it has slipped away and may never return, and that is really unmooring. It has shaken our assumptions about how we live in relation to one another, and people are questioning their place in the world and in their communities.

One bright spot is that Americans are increasingly turning to their local landscapes and local community for connection and activities. Pew Research shows that living in a place with a strong sense of community has gone up considerably in their polls, especially for urban and rural residents. That finding contributed to my desire to propose as the chair's initiative this year a cultural celebration calendar.

The richness of Santa Barbara County stems in large part from the different racial, ethnic and cultural groups that have settled here and contributed in myriad ways to the vibrant fabric of our community And to highlight some of these contributions, I'm asking my fellow board members to select a cultural group that they would like to honor as part of our 2022 Cultural Celebration.

I provided a calendar that the clerk's office kindly helped me put together that may suggest which month is most appropriate to reserve for recognizing and honoring a particular group. I hope each board member will select at least one, and you can do two or even more if you feel passionately. My staff will be following up to learn of your selections. Participation in this project can give us all a deeper appreciation of the cultural groups that have shaped our community.

Finally, I would like to close with verses from a poem that CEO Miyasato shared with me. A poem by Amanda Gorman for this new year. For me it captures the challenges of this moment. Morning we come to mend Withered we come to weather Torn we come to tend Battered we come to do better Tethered by this year of yearning, we are learning that though we weren't ready for this, we have been readied by it.

We steadily vow that no matter how we are weighed down, we must always pave a way forward. This hope is our door, our portal Even if we never get back to normal, someday we can venture beyond it. To leave the known and take the first steps so let us not return to what was normal but reach toward what is next. Thank you. And what is next for us today?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction20:01

Madam Chair could I just

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8120:02

oh yes, yes. You don't have a light let me just explain to people that because of the rise in the Omicron variant we are social distancing here yet again Supervisor

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction20:17

Hart please thank you chair Hartman. I just want to thank both chair Hartmann and past chair Nelson for their remarks this morning because I think they're very very important there is something really unique That's going on with our board and the county government at this moment in history. And it's really valuable and important, and you both spoke really eloquently to it. And it is about the respect and the civility and the culture of active listening that as board members we are supporting every day. And I just wanted to say thank you for both of you doing your part all of you doing your part to maintain this The sense of collegiality, because our country is definitely struggling with this issue. This is the most important thing in our country at this moment in history and in our small way we can all contribute to making things better by just trying harder to be what we have been which is a family and we have our strong disagreements and our deeply held values, and our different perspectives in life and experiences.

But every time we come to the people's business and are here in this room, we really take care of each other and the community as a result. And I think that is something extraordinary and something worth highlighting. Thank you.

0:21 – 0:276 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8121:44

Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8821:49

Thank you Madam Chair. Yeah, and I think this is a stark contrast to what you see. It's so...I think what highlights it so much is just so different than what everybody has seen when they turn on the news on the national level. You know, it hasn't always been this way on this board. And I for one am just happy to come here every Tuesday and you know look at these issues of not trying to figure out where You know, someone's going to try to sneak one past you or where someone's going to try to angle this or try to politically move this. But more looking at it as a whole of what's the best way to navigate through some difficult circumstances to do the best thing for majority of the people in our community? And so I do appreciate where we're going and I just want to let folks know too that on both sides of the aisle are down the middle of the isle or wherever you are It doesn't mean that someone's not fighting for you or someone's not holding fast to their values.

It's just the manner in which you do it. This is, you know, you go back and you watch—it was really interesting to me to watch. I just watched a special on Netflix about—it was The Hostages in Iran and it was the way You know, it showed some of the leaders at the time especially when the move was going from President Carter to President Reagan. And you saw Tip O'Neill there and just the camaraderie that they had just between like Tip O'Neill and President Reagan. Complete polar opposites with different views, different agendas but they worked together for the betterment of the country.

And I think maybe we can show a little bit of how that's done here. And who knows, maybe it'll spread outside of here. And what I definitely want to stop is any of that negativity coming from our federal level, the national level and even sometimes state level into this forum here. So really appreciate everybody's input today. And I have to say Bob you did a great job.

It was it wasn't easy and yeah There was a lot of things you could have done that would have really kind of, you could've screwed things up really well. And I just appreciate the fact that you didn't and you really moved, I think you really moved the needle even more of saying, you know what? We're gonna be inclusive and we're gonna talk about these things. And I might not agree with all of them but I think what you said is culture of active listening. I'd really like that. That hey, I wanna hear what the other side has to say. There's gotta be a good point somewhere I always tell folks this, and I'm sorry I'm rambling a little bit but this is something that's near and dear to me is that I wrote a speech one time for somebody. And it said at the time I put Republicans do not have a monopoly on good ideas.

And the person said, I can't say that. And they said what do you mean? What do you mean you can't say that? You can't believe that. They said no, I don't believe it but I can really say it because that's going to have my party come down on me. So you got to have the idea that we're all Americans. We're all working for the same thing You know, it's nice to come to work.

Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8125:09

And it's nice to have your historic perspective Supervisor Williams.

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction25:15

I think and I'm glad that your comments have started at the personal and gone to the gone to the existential right because it's not just that working together in collegiality makes It's a whole lot more fun to come to work and a lot more productive from a county perspective, and makes our employees a lot happier. But it also is what binds us together as a society.

We are mortal creatures that live with such short window spans kid ourselves, we could deceive ourselves to think that our system of government has proved itself as enduring for this little blip on human history that we have existed. That is—we have not proven ourselves as enduring yet. It is the actions that we will take in this next generation that will prove whether that system is enduring or can fray apart.

And to see Santa Barbara County, which for most of my political life has been heavily partisan and I've been a warrior in those partisan fights To see us bind together when the society as a whole is fraying apart is so inspirational and so needed. And we need to figure out a way to spread that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8127:02

And keep it up. Okay, getting to work here.

The next item of business is approval of the minutes from December 14th 2021. Could I have a motion?

0:27 – 0:333 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed27:20

So moved. Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8127:22

And is there any further discussion? Could I have, let's see yes your light was on okay thank you and I think we can all those in favor say aye. Aye. No opposed clerk announcements Madam Clerk

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role27:48

Chair Hartman and members of the board, good morning. Thank you I just have a couple announcements this morning. I would like to note for the record we did post an addendum on Friday January 7th amending a few items on our agenda today beginning with administrative item number five. We received a request from the department to continue administrative item number five toward January 25 2022 meeting Administrative item number five is from the Community Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding conditional reservation of funding to the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara, Housing Authority for 2021 Home Key Program application in Santa Maria and this is in the 5th District.

Additionally, we amended administrative item number 27 on the administrative agenda. This is from Public Works Department Board of Directors Laguna County Sanitation District and language was added before recommendation A to read acting as the board of directors Laguna County Sanitation District and the item is to consider recommendations regarding the abolition of improvement zone number one for vintage ranch track 14,556 And this is in the fourth district. Again, we added language immediately following the subject and before recommendation A to read acting as the board of directors for the Laguna County Sanitation District. And lastly on our addendum, we added administrative item number 33 to the agenda. This is from the Board of Supervisors sponsored by Supervisor Hart.

This is to consider recommendations regarding an approval of the Child Care Planning Council membership for 2021 through 2022. All three of those amendments to our agenda could be added to the balance of the administrative agenda Additionally, we have received a memo and change to administrative item number 21 Excuse me administrative item number 21 is from the Public Works Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding Hill Road low water crossing replacement Uh, bridge number 51C-0381 over the Quiama River Federal Project BRLO NBIL 512 County project number 862339. And this is in the first district and excuse me.

The change to this item is removing Recommendation E that did reauthorize the CEO to transfer up to $6 million from the general fund to the project fund for temporary cash flow through fiscal year 24-25 for project construction. So again, the recommendation was to remove or the change to the recommendations was to remove Recommendation E and that can also be added to the balance of the administrative agenda Additionally, I would like to remind the public of the Board of Supervisors meetings. They are being interpreted and broadcast live in Spanish. We are broadcasting our meetings in Spanish both for Cox Cable subscribers in South County as well as Comcast cable subscribers in North County. Members of the public can now view our meetings in Spanish by turning on the secondary audio programming also known as SAP or SAP under their language settings Lastly, I would like to remind the public who are participating in our meeting today of the board's updated methods of public participation.

For the Board of Supervisors' methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of our agenda. Members of the public can attend meetings in person and both the Santa Barbara Board hearing room chambers as well as the Santa Maria board hearing room chambers. Please note on December 3rd 2021, an additional county health officer order went into effect requiring indoor mask usage for everyone over the 2 years of age regardless of vaccination status if you attend the board meetings in person, you will be required to wear a face covering mask or face shield with drape at all times regardless of vaccination status Information regarding how to properly wear a mask has been posted throughout both locations.

If you do not have a mask that fits properly, we will provide you with one. Additionally for those unable to wear a mask for any reason, we can provide you with a face shield with drape. Lastly public health is encouraging social distancing due to the highly infectious Omicron variant and this pertains in both hearing room chambers Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment virtually may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page two.

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing important information about joining the virtual meeting. Once the chair has announced the item you want to comment on please join the meeting with the information provided in the registration confirmation email. You will be placed on mute until it is your turn to speak. The clerk will call you by name When removed from mute, you will hear a notification that your line has been unmuted.

For those of you using a touchtone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself again if you're using a touchtone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself each person may address the board for up to three minutes and this is at the discretion of the chair. If you have any questions please contact the clerk of the board's office at area code 805-568-2240 And that concludes my announcements for today. Thank you.

0:33 – 0:3519 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8133:11

Thank you, we'll go back to A5 in just a minute. Do any board members have an item that they would like to pull?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction33:19

Madam Chair? Yes Supervisor. A4 I forgot to say that earlier too. A 4? Supervisor

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8133:25

Nielsen? Chairman,

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction33:26

A12? A 12?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8133:28

A 13? A13?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8833:30

Any others?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8133:36

And Madam

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role33:39

Clerk, are there any items that the public would like to pull? Chair Hartman and members of the board. We have one request to speak on administrative item number 22.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8133:52

OK, would you first then read A5 for the continuance into the record, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role34:02

Yes, Chair Hartman and members of the board. Administrative item number five is brought to us from the Community Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding conditional reservation of funding to the housing authority of the County of Santa Barbara Housing Authority for 2021 Home Key Program application in Santa Maria and this is in the 5th District and we did receive a request from the department to continue this item toward January 25 2022 meeting.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8134:28

And may I have a motion to continue to the 25th?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8834:31

I'll make the motion. I just want to comment briefly is that this, the reason for the postponement was just so that I have the opportunity with staff which we're going to do tomorrow to sit down with the City of Santa Maria and hear some concerns that they have hopefully address those and have this back on the agenda on the 25th. So I'll make a motion to move it today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:52

And I'll go ahead and second the motion

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8134:55

and is there any public comment on this Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role34:59

Chair Hartman and members of the board we have no request to speak from the public on this item.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8135:03

Okay, so all in favor of the continuance to January 25th please say aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:09

Aye.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8135:09

Any opposed? Passes. Then turning to Item A4 Madam Clerk would you read that

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role35:15

into the record? Chair Hartman and members of the board. Administrative item number four is from the Community Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding conditional reservation of funding to the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara for 2021 Home Key Program application in Goleta, and this is in the 2nd District. Please

0:35 – 0:384 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8135:36

Supervisor Hart?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction35:37

Madam Chair, I just want to highlight this project. This is a really significant achievement. It's something that the Community Services Department has been working on for some time and it's really a tremendous success story. This is an opportunity to purchase the Super 8 Hotel in Goleta and use that facility to serve people who are experiencing homelessness and this is a very large hotel has 65 rooms and when it's remodeled and reconfigured into permanent supportive housing, We're going to be providing permanent supportive housing for 60 individuals in our community who are experiencing homelessness. And this is probably the single most significant investment we've made in this endeavor. It is going to be, we're reserving $3 million of our own money with the hope and aspiration to receive $16 million from the State of California through the Governor's Home Key Program which has been a challenge to implement.

properties in the county that meet the state criteria and this really does fit that grant program extraordinarily well. So I think our odds of success are very high, and it will be a really great demonstration project because we have already in previous board actions provided the funding necessary to provide the services to the folks that are going to be in this facility so this is the bricks-and-mortar side of the equation And there's a lot of good news to report in regards to the efforts that we're making to improve the lives of people who are experiencing homelessness and to prevent homelessness. This is a really significant milestone in that effort, and it's something to be celebrated, and I really want to appreciate the City of Goleta's very active partnership in this endeavor.

Right with us at every step of the way through a difficult acquisition process that took, you know more than a year to the point now where they're actually going to commit their own local funds to help support this effort too. Almost $600,000 that is dear and important additional funding to support this project so thank the City of Goleta, thank the Community Services Department, thank the CEO's office And general services and everybody that's been involved in a very complicated transaction that is getting closer and closer to the finish line.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8137:56

Thank you, Supervisor Hart. This still is in your district but I gather I have the parking lot so I have a vested interest as well and the City of Goleta really has stepped up they're also foregoing TOT so we really appreciate their partnership in this. So we'll put this with the balance of the agenda A12 Madam Clerk would you read that

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role38:18

into the record? Chair Hartman and members of the board administrative item number 12 is from the county executive office. It is to consider recommendations regarding the circumstances of the existing state of emergency.

0:38 – 0:419 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8138:31

And Supervisor Nelson,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed38:32

yeah thank you chair Hartman. You know the problem with calling your shot in advance last meeting I said I would not be voting for future actions such as this and so it was a little hard because we were in different spot than we were last month You know, my desire as much as I love Zoom. I've probably taken advantage of it more than anybody over the last year and I really hope that are the state amends the Brown Act in a way to allow zoom meetings more often but you know the comment that I made last month is that I think we need to start to begin figuring out how to live with COVID and that you Some of these recommendations coming from public health officers, but you know returning those power back to the representatives of the people to us.

And so I didn't know if I could still make the findings of the emergency, the state of emergency. And so I've really struggled with this one. I am going to go ahead and do a slow vote against it at this time. I do think Omicron is a much different virus and a different threat than what we faced in the past. I think it's time for us to start talking, maybe not with this item but maybe with the item at the end of the day on how we're going to move into the future with COVID. So I just request a roll call vote on this

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8139:58

one. Okay, Supervisor Williams?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction40:02

Well, I just want to say that I think at this point the reason why we should pass it is more has to do with the dynamicness of the situation And our lack of knowledge about what will be true a month or two or three from now. I have mixed feelings about having remote meetings, you know, I think our public comment should be primarily for local issues and local people and the remote format makes it seem harder for local people and easier for people who aren't local to make public comment. So I have some heartburn about that format, but I don't think that the county is being overly cautious. We have remained in person the entire pandemic.

government agencies, not even the legislature that can say that. And we've done so because we wanted to be accessible for the public and so you know I could see discontinuing this if events go a certain way but I think today I'm prepared to support it because I just don't think at this point we know what's going to be happening a month or two from now

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8141:29

Any other comments? May I have a motion?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction41:36

I'll move approval of A12.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8141:38

Second?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction41:39

Second.

Roll-call vote Passed 3–1 move approval of A12. Second? Second. Madam Clerk, would you call the roll?
Show transcript
Madam Clerk, would you call the roll? Supervisor Williams? Aye. Supervisor Hart? Aye. Supervisor Nelson? No. Supervisor Lavanino? Aye Chair Hartman? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role41:50

Motion passes 4-1 And

0:41 – 0:4412 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8141:53

A13 would you read that into the record madam clerk

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role41:56

Chair Hartman and members of the board. Administrative item number 13 is from the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding South Coast Youth Safety Partnership sponsors and host agency memorandum of understanding MOU and contract for fiscal years 2020 through 2021 and 2021 through 2022. Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:19

This wasn't my item.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8842:20

This was me.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8142:21

Your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:21

life was

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8142:21

on Supervisor Lovenino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8842:22

Thank you, Madam Chair. So this is just kind of tangentially attached to this so This is for the South County. We did try this in the North County and unfortunately, our efforts weren't what I was looking for. We've now seen another spike in youth gang violence including numerous shootings involving teenagers in Santa Maria Valley. In fact, I believe there was another one last night.

I'm working with some very dedicated community members to search for solutions and answers And there is an organization that's kind of a ground up response. I want to support their efforts and so I'm just looking for, I just want to alert staff that I'll be asking for you know a match of this sort for also the North County. I think our funds previously went back to the general fund but we can research that but there is a need and we've just got to figure out the proper vehicle to be able to do the best job to address that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8143:25

And I think CEO Miyasato wants to say something, but I would like to echo. Thank you so much for saying that. I think my new city of Lompoc is facing the same issue and I feel the same. CEO Miyasato.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed43:39

Chair Hartman and Supervisor Labanino thank you for bringing that up. We did quickly look at this. And again, so just history for some of the board members. In fiscal year 16-17 that Supervisor Lavinino is urging the board appropriated $75,000 to assist in some sort of North County effort. I know that Supervisor Nelson as Chief of Staff for the 4th District served on that task force and most of our criminal justice partner agencies including your department had sat on that task force.

We did spend $20,000 on the California City's Violence Prevention Network and I think that was an organization who is helping organize that. So there is $55,000 left that we have continued to set aside. And so if Supervisor Labanino comes forward with an organization or a method to spend that, we can reappropriate that for this year. So the money is available at least for you

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8844:31

So I will, I'll join with you Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Nelson. I think together we need to tackle this. This is all throughout all of our districts so um yeah I think maybe uh three heads are better than one and uh we can come up with something that works for all of us.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8144:47

Uh respecting the Brown Act yes okay so that doesn't need a separate vote uh so we can go on to A22 Madam Clerk

0:45 – 0:477 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role45:01

Chair Hartman and members of the board. Administrative item number 22 is a set hearing brought to you from the County Executive Office and the Public Works Department. This is to set a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the development of a countywide community workforce agreement, CWA ordinance and project template again this is a set hearing for February 1st 2022 Which is when the board will hear this item and we have one request to speak on this item from the public And that is Joshua Medrano.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8145:30

Okay, and I'm looking at County Council at this point This is coming for discussion its agendized for discussion the substantive issue February 1st So today any remarks have to be about the set hearing? Is that correct?

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction45:49

Madam Chair, yes you have discretion to limit it to the action taken today which is just limited to the set hearing of the item.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role45:57

Okay. All righty and we will now go to Joshua Medrano on Zoom. And Joshua, if you can unmute your microphone on your end and provide your comments. We've unmuted you on our end, Joshua. Joshua, if you can hear me, if you can unmute yourself on your end, you are muted. Chair Hartman and members of the board perhaps we can trail that item?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8146:45

Yeah or take it in public

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role46:46

comment. Correct thank you

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8146:49

so I think that concludes all the pulled items on our administrative agenda so I'll now take a motion to approve the balance of the agenda and that includes the changes to A27, the addition of A33 and the changes to A21 is that correct? So may I have a motion?

0:47 – 0:547 turns

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction47:11

So moved. Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8147:14

And all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Okay motion passes. Madam Clerk administrative item number 31 please would you read that into the record?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:35

Chair Hartman and members of the board, Administrative Item number 31 is sponsored by Supervisor Hart. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming January 2022 as Human Trafficking Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County. And joining us this morning in person is Landon Rank. And if you can join us at the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution into the record.

Whereas human trafficking is a form of modern slavery that occurs in every state including California, wherein victims are forced to work in various forms of labor exploitation including but not limited to commercial sex acts and other services that are induced through force fraud or coercion. And whereas due to its isolated and discreet nature, many individuals across the globe are unaware that trafficking exists in their communities. And it is estimated that more than 40.3 million people around the world are victims of human trafficking. And whereas human trafficking victims face a cruelty that has no place in a civilized world It is a crime that can take many forms and one that tears at our social fabric, debases our common humanity and violates what we stand for as a country.

And whereas increased education about how to identify human trafficking along with increased knowledge of in-state resources and services for those affected by criminal exploitation can help decrease the number of future victims. And whereas the Santa Barbara County Human Trafficking Task Force is committed to using all applicable laws and resources for investigating human trafficking and prosecuting those engaged in it.

And whereas, the Santa Barbara County Human Trafficking Task Force has worked diligently to bring awareness to the fact that human trafficking occurs closer to home than one might think. That California ranks number one in the country for reported human trafficking cases, and that Santa Barbara County is home to hundreds of survivors of trafficking and exploitation.

And whereas Human Trafficking Awareness Month is an opportunity to recognize the critical role all Santa Barbara residents play in preventing, reporting and adjudicating these heinous crimes. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors declares the month of January 2022 to be Human Trafficking Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction49:48

Madam Chair, if I could just briefly say welcome to Landon for being here. This is obviously a very important issue. I think that the resolution very skillfully and carefully lays out the challenge and the opportunity that we have. We have a great track record here in Santa Barbara County We're working together collaboratively and we have a really unique partnership with SB Act. And I think that's what's very, very important in addition to bringing awareness to the issue and to make people understand that even in Santa Barbara County this is a real prominent problem that needs resources and attention. And we're fortunate to have many county departments fully engaged but I want Landon to speak directly to the partnership that we have with Santa Barbara Act because they are doing really important work in this space.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8150:45

Would you start again please? Yes,

CommentLandon Rank I'mProposedself-stated50:46

that's no problem. Thank You Supervisor Hart and Chair Hartman members of the Board of Supervisors my name is Landon Rank I'm a lifelong resident of Santa Barbara County and I'm on staff with SB Act the Santa Barbara Alliance for Community Transformation which is a 501c3 working here in our county and partnering with the county DA's office on this project I'm here on behalf of the SB County Human Trafficking Task Force today to thank the Board of Supervisors for your adoption of this resolution in honor of Human Trafficking Awareness Month for Santa Barbara County. And I'm also here today in sad recognition of the fact that not only does human trafficking exist in our world today, in our country and our state but it also exists in our community here in Santa Barbara County.

As much as we'd like to think our lovely home is immune to this heinous crime, we'd be ignoring reality to the detriment of our neighbors. What's more, the unique challenges of the last few years have only exacerbated the risk factors that create conditions for human trafficking to happen. We've seen countless members of our community lose sources of income due to the pandemic. We've seen rising housing prices statewide and more.

The growing sense of desperation among our most vulnerable neighbors is palpable. So since 2017, the Human Trafficking Task Force has initiated 192 new human trafficking investigations in our county. From this work more than 180 survivors have been identified of these 180 30% were minors and I'd like to just let that sink in. An additional 33% were between the ages of 18 to 24. 45%, almost half, were Santa Barbara County residents prior to entering a trafficking situation and another 44% were California residents in general.

91% of these cases were instances of sex trafficking but we suspect that there's also a large amount of labor trafficking that goes underreported in our community. But I don't want to get bogged down with specifics. I do want to restate that's 180 of our neighbors, men, women, children, teens who were living as slaves in our midst. This is unconscionable and I stand in recognition of them and all those who have not yet been discovered.

SB County Human Trafficking Task Force was formed in 2013 to support these survivors and to prevent trafficking throughout our county. The task force is a multidisciplinary coalition of law enforcement, supportive service providers, community advocates and more that provide leadership, data-driven decisions, public awareness and outreach, investigations and prosecutions, and services for the survivors themselves. I'm grateful to be a part of this coalition alongside our county partners that has helped to draw public attention to the issue and meet the specific needs of this uniquely vulnerable population.

As this is Human Trafficking Awareness Month, we'll be hosting a virtual vigil in solidarity with survivors on Thursday January 20th at 530 p.m. You can register for the Zoom at tinyurl.com slash VigilForFreedom2022 and I'll share this link as well so that it's available for the public We encourage you to join us. North, South, Mid-County partners will all be with us that day and I'll forward other links we have more information about other events happening throughout the month on our Facebook page website and at TrafficStopSB.org So on behalf of the task force, I want to say thank you again for your continued support and for standing with survivors this month. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8153:53

Thank you so much for the work that you and your organization does. Madam Clerk, would you read item number 32 into the record please?

0:54 – 0:592 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role54:09

Chair Hartman and members of the Board, Administrative Item number 32 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution of accommodation honoring Stephanie Langsdorf as the January 2022 Employee of the Month for Santa Barbara County and joining us in person today we have Stephanie Langsdorf and a few members of our Human Resources Department including our Human Resources Director, excuse me, Maria Elena de Cuevara.

And if you could join us at the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution into the record. Whereas, Stephanie Langsdorf began her career with the County of Santa Barbara working in the Board of Supervisors Third District Office in 2009 and joined the Human Resources Department in 2017 where she currently splits her time between the Civil Service Commission and the Employee Relations Division.

And whereas Stephanie serves as primary staff support for the Civil Service Commission advising employees, labor representatives and other individuals who have business before the commission preparing meeting agendas and minutes coordinating follow-up with hearing officers and interested parties and otherwise assisting the commission chair and other commissioners as needed.

And whereas in her role in employee relations, Stephanie undertakes special projects, conducts research, analyzes results, draft documents, organizes people and information and generally does whatever needs to be done to help the Employee Relations Division reach collective bargaining agreements. Resolve grievances, prepare for various negotiations, investigate allegations of misconduct and respond to other issues as they arise. And whereas Stephanie brings resourcefulness, curiosity, logic and a great attitude to her daily work and to whatever other duties are assigned which have included everything from helping to draft a new employee handbook to learning how to present information online in a usable format to planning events large and small.

And whereas Stephanie is enormously capable and does all of the things professionally and skillfully with considerable tact in diplomacy, with admirable patience and good humor. And with both an inviolable grasp of the big picture as well as great attention to detail. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Stephanie Langsdorf as the employee of the month for January 2022 passed and adopted today.

CommentMaria ElenaProposedself-stated56:37

Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the board. Happy New Year as well to all of you. I'm Maria Elena de Guevara, the County's Human Resources Director and I'm happy to come before you this morning to restart the county's Employee of the Month program. The program was suspended in early 2020 due to the pandemic Rochelle Johnson who's with me this morning, the program coordinator and I bring it back to you effective today because as the poem that Chair Hartman read earlier this morning no matter how weighed down we may be A program like the Employee of the Month can help build a culture of appreciation and because our county employees are in fact worthy of the recognition.

And it's my pleasure to introduce to you our first Employee of the Month recipient for 2022, Ms. Stephanie Langston. Stephanie has been with the county since 2009 and she's been with County HR since 2017 And I had the pleasure of meeting Stephanie at the end of 2018 when I first arrived and When she was only working for us part-time after our first Exchange, I knew a few things right away She was very bright She had a clever sense of humor and I knew I had to find a way to increase her time with County HR.

And she hasn't disappointed since, in fact she has exceeded all expectations. It's not always easy to wear two hats but Stephanie navigates her dual roles as Civil Service Commission Secretary and employee relations analyst with the cool composure of a seasoned quarterback. Go Raiders! Had to throw that in there. And she is described by her customers and teammates as a shining star, and the glue that holds us together.

Stephanie's commitment to learning and growing is evidenced by her willingness to accept any assignment that stretches her. She was recently involved in labor negotiations, and is currently enrolled in the Labor Relations Academy Master's Certification Program with the goal of getting certified through CalPERS by June 2023. Many congratulations, Stephanie. Your politeness, patience and problem-solving attitude have contributed immensely to the increased quality of customer interactions and the department's productivity. Your professionalism and helpfulness represent County HRs' and the county's values at their core.

Thank you for using your valuable skills in our service. We cherish your contributions and look forward to your continued successes.

0:59 – 1:034 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed59:51

Thank you so much for the honor today. It's really nice to be up here after a couple, a year without having an employee of the month. And I want to acknowledge the board and say thank you to all of you. And first off, I'd like to thank the civil service commissioners especially over this last two years during the pandemic they've really embraced Zoom and they haven't really missed a beat. They've held public meetings remotely and performed their duties When asked, they've shown up in person to hold hearings in a socially distanced manner and they really just modeled the spirit of public service. So I appreciate all of them. I'm excited to be part of the Human Resources team led by Maria Elena.

She sets a really high bar for excellence and pushes change and innovation And we all do our best to meet that, you know every challenge with professionalism and that can-do attitude that she models for us. In my role with employee relations I'm just fortunate and really appreciate Joe Pisano he's just the best to learn from. My whole ER team they have a wealth of knowledge to share And they just have the patience to teach in a supportive, like learn by doing way. You know they kind of model it and then throw you into it and that's really what helps me thrive. That's the way I appreciate learning.

Each day I have the pleasure of working with staff that perform diverse functions throughout the county from every department. And I just really want to, in closing, acknowledge and appreciate their contributions every day. We've all over the last two years learned to pivot and pick up new skills just in the daily performance of our duties. You know, I have a great job, and I'm just really thankful to be part of Santa Barbara County. So thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:01:52

It's so great to hear. Supervisor Williams.

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:01:59

Well there's just one part of the record that I have a problem with which is that Stephanie, it is mentioned that Stephanie has worked for the county since 2009. The reality is that Stephanie was invested in this county and its future by working in politics, largely for people affiliated with the county for over 10 years longer than that. And so it doesn't count on your benefits credit but it counts on your credit in my heart and should in the hearts of your colleagues that the concern and the care and the investment that you've had in the county as an institution for a long time.

Thank you Stephanie.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:02:45

And it's so great to have employee of the month back again. It's a step towards the new normal. Thank you so much. So that finishes off the administrative agenda. I forgot to ask the CEO whether she had a report today. No report

1:03 – 1:1011 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:03:01

this morning.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:03:02

Okay, so we're turning to general public comment and our rules say that general public comment is 15 minutes total and I gather we have five people so three minutes each. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:03:17

Chair Hartman and members of the board, that is correct. We have five requests to speak on general public comment this morning and we will begin on Zoom with Joshua excuse me actually unfortunately Joshua is not available but we will begin on zoom with Denise Adams to be followed by Lynn Gibbs and if you are a member of the public and you have signed up on general public comment for our agenda today now is the time to log in and provide your comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:03:53

Hi, can you hear me? Happy New Year to all of you. Yes we can thank you please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:03:58

proceed. Thank you I'm Zoom tech inept anyway I wanted to start off by thanking my supervisor District 1 Supervisor Das Williams for addressing accessibility issues for his constituents at meetings. I'm grateful that you have kept the chambers open so that people like me who are zoom and app can still access you And I while I'm addressing you Supervisor Williams, I also want to remind you that my street where the road department started work in April. We would welcome them coming back now that is 2022 to finish it up because it's still awaits the road department.

I wanted to call in today to address the comments by Supervisor Hartman. Congratulations on your appointment and your opening remarks were regarding celebrating our diverse cultures, and I've lived here for 42 years in Santa Barbara County, and I hope in 2022 that as our elected board you will start by celebrating the American culture The unique, most highly admired and desired culture in the world is our culture that of the United States of America. And it's being ignored. I think by recognizing our American culture you just might be able to unify our county community and give every person here hope and confidence that our government can be restored.

And I, for one can tell you that I've lost all confidence in government and it's just very depressing. There is a high segment within this community that are ignored and excluded. No amount of tax funded grants or money that you gift to the Fund for Santa Barbara for Equity will result in equity until everyone in our community gets served. And as our county leaders, I hope you will actively listen to all of us.

Then it's time in my opinion to respond to the excluded part of our community which includes people like me that were excluded from daily life and then all those students that are excluded from attending public schools. And the unintended consequences, which is something that Supervisor Hart always addressed at the City Council level are many. We're going to have a demand for more housing if Santa Barbara City College does not admit 40% of our students here within our district are not allowed to attend city college on campus.

And the plan is that they will replace that decline in enrollment with foreign students. Those foreign students are gonna come in and they're gonna demand housing. So my suggestion to all of you, is will you please schedule some meetings with the Public Health Department to hear from the people who live within this county? Because the consequences are many. I'm hearing from principals of public

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:07:09

schools daily- Thank you so much for sharing your comments with us today.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:07:17

We will now go to Lynn Gibbs to be followed by Justin Shores.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:07:21

And before Ms. Gibbs starts, I close public comment the line for signing in now. Thank you and we

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:07:29

will go to Lynn Gibbs.

CommentLynn GibbsProposedself-stated1:07:38

Good morning. My name is Lynn Gibbs and I share the NAMI Santa Barbara County Public Policy Committee. I was asked to make a comment regarding the COVID outbreak at the jail. And I will say that I've read about the measures that the Sheriff's Department is taking, and I've read the criticisms. And I don't feel well enough informed to make a judgment as to whether enough is being done or not being done so this is not the subject of my comment. But I wanted to say that I've been contacted by parents whose children are on felonies in the jail and have been for some time who are besides themselves with worry.

Statewide, there are 1700 plus inmates in jails On felonies awaiting transfer to the state hospital system. And last week, the state hospital system suspended transfers because of COVID. So this will just lengthen the time people have to wait. If I personally know six parents whose kids are sitting in the jail on felonies, I wonder what the scope of the problem is and we'd like to understand that.

We can't afford to continue having these persons just sitting in the jail. And we have heard that over the past several months There's been increasing pressure to arrest people at the psychiatric health facility on felony charges and move them to the jail. And for behaviors that in the past would not have been arrested. And to us, this is the opposite of the diversion effort we're engaged in.

The Community Corrections Partnership set aside $3 million several years ago for a secured mental health rehabilitation center outside the jail and the state has competitive grant opportunities for infrastructure right now Yet, we understand that the Community Corrections Partners Subcommittee on the MHRC has remained firmly focused on misdemeanors. And we hope that in their upcoming recommendations they'll address the situation with felony clients in the jail. We and NAMI believe it's time to move ahead on planning for the secured Forensic treatment facility outside the jail for persons with. That is your

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:10:46

time. And we will now go to Justin Shores, who is our final speaker on general public comment, Justin.

1:10 – 1:304 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:10:58

Thank you very much. Congratulations, Chair Hartman. I hope you enjoy your next year in the position. I do wanna kind of echo what a caller earlier said on bringing the community together. I think it's to be more effective outreach to our community to highlight our culture in Goleta even, our local culture, bring our city together or our county together, the Santa Barbara culture I think people are really proud of that. We're really proud of our community, we're really proud of what we've got here so I think that should be more of a focus when you're trying to bring people together than trying to split people into boxes and almost divide them even more. So I think there would be something to think about. I know it would ring true. I think people are really looking for I just want to throw out one more time.

My mom got COVID really bad and she was sent home with no treatment in California. And now that Dr. Fauci is even more exposed on the emails that came out yesterday, he was talking Thank you, Mr. Chair. When will Dr. Ansort say anything about it? It's not what he is saying, it's what he is not saying. I'm going to keep saying it and coming here and saying save people's lives. Bring this out in front and tell us why Dr. Ansort and pharmacies in Santa Barbara County are not prescribing treatments.

Are we letting people die? Why are we sending them home with known treatments available. So I just really, I'm not going to stop saying that because it's truer and truer every day the more and more you guys ignore it and the more Dr. Ansorg and the public health Thank you so much.

not transcribed≈29s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈27s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:13:48

Thank you Mr. Schor and that concludes public comment? Yes, Chair Hartman and members of the board that concludes public comment. And Madam Clerk do we need a 10-minute break for the translator?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:13:59

Chair Hartman and members of the board yes if we can please receive either five to ten minute break that would be much appreciated.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:14:05

Okay we'll have a ten minute break and reconvene at 1035. So we are reconvening the meeting of January 11, 2022. First meeting of the year here in Santa Barbara Board Chambers and we're social distancing because of COVID so Supervisor Lavanino and Supervisor Hart aren't available can't see them on the screen necessarily but they are here. Madam Clerk will you read our first departmental item into the record?

1:30 – 1:3828 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:30:40

Chair Hartman and members of the board. Departmental item number one is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider the Board of Supervisors 2022 appointments to the boards, commissions and committees. And as the board will recall each January, the Board of Supervisors consider appointments to boards, commissions and committees on which a member or members of the Board of Supervisors serve.

We have three attachments to the board letter associated with this item today. Attachment A is a list of boards, commissions and committees on which a member or members of the board serve. Attachment B is a current Board of Supervisors appointment to boards, commissions and committees. And attachment C is the current Board of Supervisors appointments organized by supervisor.

As the board will see on the screen, we will be tracking any and all changes as we go through the list of boards commissions and committees. I recommend that we utilize attachment B of today's staff report as our guide that reflects the current appointments made in 2021. And with that i am going to turn it over to Chair Hartman and the Board for further discussion.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:31:45

Okay, well I think the clerk's advice is good that we just go down and ask if there is any desire to change. So Adult and Aging Network, that's Supervisor Williams and myself. I would love to continue. What about you Supervisor Williams?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:32:03

I could continue but if one of my colleagues wanted to do a stint that would be fine as well.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:32:10

Is anybody raising their hand for this assignment? I don't see. So, I think you're continuing Supervisor Williams if you are willing to do it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:32:21

I

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:32:21

am. The next is Area Agency on Aging and that's Supervisor Lavinino and he has got thumbs up and nobody is fighting him for that. Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment, BEACON. We have Supervisor Williams Hart and I serve as an alternate. Is there any change there? Seeing none, that holds. Behavioral Wellness Commission, Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:32:51

Actually can we go back to that just for a moment? Oh sure. There's an additional vacant alternate member is that? That's the first time I've seen that.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:32:59

Yeah thank

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:33:00

you for pointing that

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:33:01

out. Yes Chair Hartman and members of the board upon Further discovery, we did notice in the bylaws and in the board's protocols that for or in the bylaws for Beacon. Thank you excuse me that this position does our appointment does have two regular members and two alternates but historically our board has only appointed one alternate but you do have the option to appoint a second alternate member for this board

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:33:30

And I would add that I've been the alternate for a number of years and never attended a meeting. But if you're eager to be an alternate on Beacon, we can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:33:39

My understanding is it's typically a South County agency but now that all five districts have a piece of the coast now, I wouldn't mind serving on that as an alternate at least to get my foot in the door there.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:33:51

So we'll put Supervisor Nelson as one of the two alternates

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:33:57

So we can talk about this later with the County Council that how we choose which alternate would be going then if Supervisor Williams or Hart can't attend. And so is it your preference that then Supervisor Hartman and then if she's not available, Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:12

I think that's what my intention would be especially since I think Supervisor Hartman has more representation of some of the areas along the coast. Okay. I'd be glad to be the subservient alternate there. That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:34:24

helpful thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:34:25

Again, I'm eager to go but our colleagues are always there. So it won't be a heavy lift for you. Turning to E, California State Association of Counties, CSAC and Supervisor Williams is a regular member and Supervisor Hart is the alternate. Any changes there?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:34:49

Excuse me Chair Hartman and members of the board. We covered D for Behavioral Wellness Commission? Yes,

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:34:55

Supervisor. We did and then we went back. Supervisor Hart's continuing.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:34:59

Great thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:35:02

So CSAC any changes? Okay stays status quo. CENCAL Health I'm willing to continue if anybody has a burning desire I would open it up the opportunity Okay, I will continue. The Child Care Planning Council, Supervisor Hart is the regular member, Supervisor Nelson is the alternate. Any changes to that? Okay. Communify, formerly the Community Action Commission, Supervisor Nelson is the regular member and Supervisor Hartman is the alternate.

Any changes to that? I should say, I have not been active as the alternate although that's allowed. If anybody would like to do it and can be more active than I've been as the alternate they're welcome but okay status quo. Community Corrections Partnership Supervisor Hart continue? Debt Advisory Committee. Supervisor Lavinino as the regular member, Supervisor Nelson as the alternate.

Continue. The Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions. Two regular members, Supervisor Hart and myself. I'd very much like to continue and Supervisor Hart chairs that group. We've got a meeting coming up soon. Verse 5. Supervisor Williams is the regular member and Supervisor Nelson is the alternate. Continuing. The Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee, two regular members and that's Supervisor Williams and me but we never meet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:36:53

And supervisors we don't meet because the law had changed in that there is no money to be allocated basically but we continue this in case there should be a change. So this is a placeholder? Yes.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:37:06

Juvenile Justice Coordination Council, Supervisor Nelson is the North

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:37:10

County. Just supervisors just so that Natasha's caught up so we would keep status quo on that one

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:37:15

yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:37:16

thank you

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:37:18

So Juvenile Justice Coordination Council, Supervisor Nelson is the North County regular member and Supervisor Hart is the South County regular member. Looks like continuing status quo. Kids Network, I serve as the chair and Supervisor Lavinino is the vice-chair. We're both eager to continue. The law library, that's something the Chair does and so I'll take that on.

Legislative Program Committee, Supervisor Williams and myself. I'd love to continue, Supervisor Williams? Okay. I

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:38:01

would like to continue that but yeah.

1:38 – 1:4328 turns

CommentLibrary Advisory CommitteeProposedself-stated1:38:08

Library Advisory Committee, one regular member Supervisor Williams.

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:38:14

I can continue that.

CommentLibrary Advisory CommitteeProposedself-stated1:38:15

All right. LAFCO, and these are appointed for actual terms and so I think we just leave those terms in place. We have Supervisor Lovanino and myself his term expires in March 2022 mine in March 2023 and Supervisor Williams has been the alternate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:38:40

Chair Hartman? I don't know if that creates an opportunity in March to have a discussion or whether it's a discussion we can have now, especially since the agenda is for today. I spoke with Supervisor Lavenino before today's meeting. You know, I represent the community of Orkut and I'm going to be growing my unincorporated representation in the coming year and a lot of those areas, especially the east side of Santa Maria that I am going to be representing, that is where it's proposed for future annexations so I think it would Especially if there's with Supervisor Lavinino's agreement, I like to take that his spot on LAFCO. I know typically Supervisor Williams has been the alternate and you might want to move the alternate up but I would ask boards indulgence on letting me be a voting member considering that there are some significant portions of my district that are open for annexation and potential conflicts that might exist there that I'm really attentive to and want to be an engaged partner

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:39:45

And Supervisor Williams?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:39:48

I would be amenable to that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:39:50

Okay so we do have a change now, I believe this doesn't happen until March unless we get a resignation

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:40:03

Chair Hartman and members of the board, I'm consulting with council at the moment but it is my understanding that since we are agendized today I believe we can either reappoint or appoint to a new term ending to March 1st 2026 since they are four-year terms on LAFCO but perhaps you can give us a minute.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:40:22

Yeah maybe we appoint till March 2022 and then reappoint

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction1:40:32

Madam Chair, I'm just going to take a look at that really quick if you want to keep going.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:40:35

Okay yeah we'll come back to yes. Madam

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:40:39

Chair I just want to weigh in on that just for a second when Supervisor Nelson brought that to me you know I was a little hesitant at first then when I looked at the new basically district boundaries the pressure for annexation in Santa Maria as it pertains to the county would be heading east I no longer have Eastern Santa Maria that's going to be in the 4th District, so it really did make sense to me. So I think Supervisor Nelson is probably in a much better position to deal with things that are on the agenda there.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:41:13

Just while we're looking at that how many years have you served on LAFCO?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:41:18

It's been awhile. Well since I think since I started. I've been at least an alternate for probably 12 years

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:41:28

Okay well, while County Council is looking at that we will go to Multi-Jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force Supervisor Hart and myself continue. NACO National Association of Counties Supervisor Lavinino regular member Supervisor Williams as the alternate continue that The Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board. Supervisor Nelson is the regular member, I'm the alternate member.

This conflicts with the adult and aging networks so when I've had to attend I missed one so I find it fascinating but it's a conflict so I'd like to find another alternate. And Supervisor Hart? I see a little nod there.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction1:42:24

Well, I had previously served on this committee and it is really valuable learning experience to be part of that. I don't know if Supervisor Lavenino would want to have that experience but

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:42:37

I passed it to you. I think everybody's got an opportunity.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42:45

I think what we have talked about before is maybe rotating everybody through because this is so important. That said, this whole year has been on Zoom. I really haven't got a chance to really engage on this committee so I'd like to stay on for at least another year but thinking the future of us going down that route of going through because it's I think it's a huge importance to the county.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:43:03

So we still need an alternate?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:43:06

I'll serve as the alternate if

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:43:07

yeah The retirement board, and that's Supervisor Lavinino. And that term ends at the end of this year. Do you want to continue, Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:43:23

I would love

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:24

to. Chair Harmon, if Supervisor Lavinino can keep bringing in the returns he does we can appoint him for life.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:43:31

Exactly.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:43:32

Yes, I will guarantee that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:43:35

And a new committee, the Rural County Representatives of California. Supervisor Nelson is the regular member and Supervisor Lavanino is the alternate and I assume you'll both continue?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:45

Yes

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:43:45

please. The Funders Collaborative of Home for Good, Supervisor Williams and Supervisor Nelson?

1:43 – 1:4717 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:54

I'm glad to stay. That brings up the question on whether that committee is still valid and maybe that's something we should ask staff to go back on. I think that was around having United Way of North Santa Barbara County be a part of the contract for the county, I don't think they are for this use anymore and so the need for it might be moot.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:44:18

We can look at that. It'd be helpful if you make your appointments then we can come back to the board but thank

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:44:25

And then the last one is the Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board, Supervisor Lavinino. Okay that brings us back to LAFCO.

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction1:44:36

Madam Chair and members of the board I've looked at the guidance on LAFCO and consulted with My recommendation is that we go ahead and replace Supervisor Labadino with Supervisor Nielsen to end the term in March. And my recommendation is just bring it back in March because otherwise, the terms are all supposed Staggered and starting in March, so just don't want to get the appointments to be off if we did a new appointment today. So just I think you could do as part of the motion just to replace Supervisor Lavanino's regular position with Supervisor Nelson until the end of this term.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:45:18

Okay, so

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:45:20

Madam Chair just to make it cleaner and easier. I think we have a meeting in February. I'll let them know in February that I'm going to move and those just bring it back. I don't want to look like I was resigning the post or something like that. I want to fill out my term and then we'll have let's just bring it so that in March Supervisor Nelson comes in as the new member.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:45:41

So that's our understanding and then so its status quo for this moment

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:45:44

correct?

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:45:48

Supervisor Williams, did you have something you wanted to add?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:45:51

No I think that's a good

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:45:52

approach. So before we get a motion then I think we want to summarize what the changes are and so for Beacon we're adding a second alternate supervisor Nelson The law library, we're adding the chair back. We're going to do some work on the funders collaborative. Are there any other changes? Did I miss any?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:46:26

I think the Psychiatric Health Board have

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:46:28

it in place. Oh that's right. Thank you. The one that I'm... And so that's Supervisor Lavanino. Correct yes. Okay can I get a motion then

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction1:46:42

I'll move approval of the recommended changes. Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:46:46

And all in favor please say aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:46:49

Aye.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:46:50

Any opposed? Passes one of those little courtesies that could have been very difficult and you made it very easy so turning then next to departmental item number two

1:47 – 1:499 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:47:11

Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number two is brought to us by the clerk recorder assessor and elections department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance adding chapter 11 C to the county code requiring electronic campaign disclosure.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:47:30

And Mr. Holland will you be making the presentation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:47:34

Yes, actually it's not much of a presentation. This is really just introduction of an ordinance adding Chapter 11 C to the county code, which would require electronic campaign disclosure and filing, which has long been on our list of things to finally accomplish. And so we're proud to be bringing this before your board. We just need to read in the title into the today and then have that This item continued to January 25th so that the ordinance will in fact become law, which will then allow us to do electronic campaign disclosure and filing.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:48:28

Well thank you for your hard work on this. Are there any board questions of Mr Holland? I see no lights or nods. Is there any public comment on this matter Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:48:43

Chair Hartman and members of the board we have no request to speak on this item.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:48:47

Okay, bringing it back to the board may I have a motion that we approve this first reading?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:53

I'll make a motion that we approve the introduction of the ordinance so staff recommendation.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:49:02

Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:49:04

All in favor please say aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. Thank you very much, thank you Mr. Holland. So turning to departmental agenda item number three And Madam Clerk, will you read that into the record please?

1:49 – 1:547 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:49:25

Chair Hartman and members of the board departmental item number three is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to receive and file an update regarding the county of Santa Barbara's 2020 Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission also known as CERC final approved plan for the county of Santa Barbara Supervisorial Districts.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:49:46

And who is making the presentation on this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:53

Supervisors, this is just to give you an update on all the supervisorial district changes that were made by the CERC. And so Ms. Anderson will give the presentation and I also know that Mr. Glenn Morris who served as the chair of the CERC is also online. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:50:07

Ms. Anderson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:50:09

Good morning Chair Hartman and members of the board. This item is to provide you a brief update on the county's supervisorial redistricting process recently completed by the Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission. The commission, known as CERC, adopted its final plan on December 13th and in accordance with county code submitted that plan to the County Elections Department. The plan becomes effective 30 days after the submittal which would be January 13th or this week.

The Commission is considering holding a final meeting later this month to discuss process improvements for the next redistricting that would be submitted to your board for information and future consideration. This was the first redistricting process for the county that was not led by your board. As a result of Measure G, that established the Independent Commission.

The commission has spent the last year completing their primary function. The process included 39 public meetings and many outreach sessions. The meetings included hundreds of County Public participants in more than 1700 public comments with 114 draft maps submitted. The complete redistricting process has been documented in detail over the past year on the CERC's website at drawsantabarbaracounty.org. The county is required to retain this information for 10 years until the next redistricting.

On this site, the public can find all of the information related to the meetings held including Agendas, minutes, public comments and recorded videos of the meetings. Additionally all the draft maps and of course the adopted map are posted. The interactive mapping tool available allows anyone to look up an address for district changes The adopted map did result in some district boundary changes as a result of the plan that impacted all five districts. Changes in the boundaries have potential impacts on the residential location of current board members and appointments made by board members. All current supervisors, however, remain qualified within your respective districts.

Staff is continuing to check certain appointments for boards, commissions and committees. While the district boundary changes can be found on the redistricting website, we did want to note some of the more significant changes by district. For District 1, West Quiama Valley moved from District 5. For District 2, Isla Vista and UCSB areas moved from District 3. For District 3, the Lompoc area moved from District 4. For District 4, the areas Los Alamos, Vandenberg Village and Vandenberg Space Force Base moved from District 3 And for District 5, the Guadalupe area moved from District 3 After review of more than 70 boards, commissions and communities, staff has identified the following commissions that may be impacted by boundary changes. They include the Civil Service Commission, County Riding and Hiking Trails Advisory Committee, Fish and Wildlife Commission, Historic Landmarks Advisory Commission, and the Planning Commission as well.

County Council is working with the administrators of these commissions to identify any action that is needed. Lastly I would like to take this opportunity to thank the commissioners, the CERC staff and the public participants that made this incredibly important effort so productive and engaging. If anyone from the public would like more information related to the redistricting process we would encourage them to visit the CERC's website at Draw Santa Barbara County org that concludes my comments for this item and as CEO Miyasato indicated Chair Glenn Morris of the SERC is also available by zoom

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:54:04

CEO Miyasato, did you have anything you wanted to add?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:54:09

No, I just also want to thank not only if you watched any of the commission members how thoughtful they were how much time it took. Thank you really to Glenn Morris for Facilitating excellent Commission meetings. I thought and also I want to thank my staff because although is a independent redistricting Commission I Foolishly thought it wouldn't take a lot of my office's time and just helping facilitate and coordinate but thank you very much to miss Anderson Gina DePinto and I want to echo the appreciation that your staff expressed to members of your team, the county staff as well as our contracted

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:55 – 2:018 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:55:07

I suspect that everybody invested a lot more time in this process than we anticipated going in, but they did it with grace and with a willingness to work through the issues and to do it in a positive way. We would not have been as successful as we were without a lot of those quiet efforts on the part of the staff. And then finally, just express appreciation to the rest of the commissioners You know, for most of us this was a new experience and opportunity and a lot of on the job learning. But again I think everyone stepped up and really took the assignment seriously and tried to put aside some of their maybe personal opinions and really tried to listen to the feedback we got from From the members of the public. Let me just finish by just expressing also appreciation to the public.

I believe that the number ended up being somewhere in the neighborhood of 1700 or something like that, you know formally recorded comments and many folks engaged with us in this process. I think we all learned things about our county that maybe not everyone knew. And so that was a useful exercise. Our commission does plan to do some, to engage in an effort later in the first quarter to capture ideas and recommendations for whoever gets to do this in 10 years.

So that hopefully some of that learning doesn't get lost. But again, The support of the county and the members of the public, and glad to hand the final document over to you at this point.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:57:03

Thank you for your skilled chairmanship. This could have gone off the rails and it could have been something where we at the board had to pass it off to the courts and it would have been a very different situation so thank you very much to everyone who came to this successful outcome. Are there questions for Ms. Anderson or Mr. Morris from Board members? Supervisor Williams

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction1:57:29

I just wanted to thank all those who volunteered to be on the commission. Without that participation, this process would fall apart and thank the people who provided Public comment, you know this is also needs to be a participatory part of the democracy. You know there were definitely disappointments that I had or and frankly nervousness that my colleagues have had that I felt vicariously.

But of course, I also understand that it's in the nature of having this kind of process that not everything that I think should be the way the universe is structured comes to pass. And so, you know, I would say that it is something I remain thankful for and thankful for the public and the people who stepped up to help make it happen.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:58:37

Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:58:38

Well, thank you Madam Chair. I do have a question before I have any comments on that one of those I think is to Miss Anderson and that is one of the one of the commissions or committees whatever it's called that I didn't see on the list that is kind of a concern to me as the Santa Maria Cemetery District and that does have I believe five trustees they're on terms and that has now moved out of the fifth district and into the fourth district And I'm just going to need some help and probably some legal help as well of how do we, you know, what's how do we make that transition of power? And do they serve out their terms or do they not serve out their terms or do they need to be reappointed by Supervisor Nelson or how all that plays out. So it's the cemetery, Santa Maria Cemetery District.

And again, fifth district supervisor is the one that makes those appointments. So and the sooner we can make that transition, the better if there is This is one of those things unfortunately, I'm wrapping in a bow and handing to Supervisor Nelson And I know we're all kind of We're all you know, I know supervisor Hartman's reached out to my office as well Transitioning Guadalupe and there's a lot of things that we need to do. This is one. I'll be happy to move on with

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.811:59:56

supervisor Nelson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:59:58

Yeah, so um speaking to this cemetery district specifically which for those of you that don't know that's actually where I got my start in a And local government, I served on that committee and actually as the chair for multiple years before getting more engaged. You know what? Yes it's going to be in the fourth district but you know that's not the only but the district itself is a city of Santa Maria and Orkut. And so I think as we start to look at some of these districts let's take a look at that and see if that's still appropriate to be all of them by a single supervisor even the Lompoc It's going to be in the new third district. That district includes Vandenberg Village and so those people that live in that community, I think some of my appointees live in the village.

They're part of that district. So maybe we could take a second look at some of these committees that cross district lines kind of like we do with the NBAR where we have some appointments from the 3rd and 4th and 5th I do that collectively. I'm more than happy to be engaged and appoint all of them if necessary, but I think there's a better way to do it in the future.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.882:01:09

Well, I think you brought up a good point because honestly we're probably split on how much we have at Santa Maria so I don't mind keeping it. There's got to be some changes that are forthcoming but I just need some guidance on how we legally handle that transition or we redefine who appoints what.

2:01 – 2:088 turns

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction2:01:32

Madam Chair, members of the board. We're happy to take a look at both of those and if there's any others that you think of just just let us know but the ones that we've reviewed so far are where there's residency requirements from the appointees So these are a little different because they're their district boundaries aren't changing but it may impact which supervisor does the appointments?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.882:01:54

So having said that so on Planning Commission just Just want to make sure so my commissioner is no longer inside my district. I just want to make sure he's able to fill out. He'll be able to complete his term, so he will go to the end of December. Wanted how that plays out?

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction2:02:14

Manager and Supervisor Levin. You know, I'll take a look at

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.882:02:17

that and

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction2:02:17

I'll just follow up with you separately.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.882:02:18

OK. So then just comment wise, I just wanted to first off, I wanted to thank Supervisor Nelson He's the one actually that kind of kicked this whole thing off and there was times when. The commission wasn't really going the way I thought it was going to go and so I was maybe not thanking him at the time, but I think what Supervisor Williams said was correct is that the reason why we gave us this to the citizens is to take it out of our hands and I think it's just better public policy however in the map ended up I started off by saying that I didn't care what map we ended up with. I thought it was going to be something better than whatever the five of us came up with and while I had my doubts at the end, a lot of sleepless nights but we did.

We ended up with something that I think had put public policy over politics and that's what should have happened. And so thank you to all the members of the commission. I'm sure it was much more work than anybody thought they were signing up for Quite frankly, I pretty much ignored the beginning of it because it was so confusing and there were so many maps and only got really connected once it got down to the nitty gritty. But you know, I'm glad I'm welcoming in Guadalupe.

And one of the tweaks that I would like to see, I think I won't be around next time but I think there does need to be, I think the rules were a little strict on engaging with anybody that had an interest at all. It really seemed and maybe that's a good thing. I don't know it just felt like a little hands tied approach and then when people are in those situations generally they try to figure out how to make it happen without following the rules so I think there was pressure on that from some people You know, I'm sure everybody did what they were supposed to do. But I just think that there needed to be a little bit more of an open line of communication. It can all be reported just like we do whenever we have ex parte.

It just seemed people, I don't know, were either hesitant to contact people and so anyway, I thought we ended up with a great map. I'm very supportive and I'm looking forward to my new district.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:04:44

Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:46

Yeah, thank you Chair Hartman. I was involved in getting this going behind the scenes with an organization here locally but ultimately this was a measure that was written I believe in most part by Supervisor Williams so there's a lot of things there that actually ultimately passed and I think I remember some discussions I had with his Chief of Staff at time You know, maybe we should have got all together at the very beginning and wrote a single ordinance and work together because this has always been something Supervisor Williams has been an advocate for. He was an advocate for this when he was in the state legislature I think he may have voted for the bill that allowed counties to do this because that's actually new legislation that allowed that to happen for this census and I believe our county was Only one or definitely the first to have a citizen's initiative, to have a citizen's independent redistricting commission.

So we were vanguards here and there's a lot of things to be celebrated when you know one thing that I thought was to be noted it was a unanimous decision at the end. You know despite cries of partisanship at the very end all 11 commissioners signed on to this and put their names behind it and voted for it. There was a supermajority requirement as the initiative required, but ultimately it was a unanimous decision and I think that speaks volumes to the commission and also what we're doing up here as a board. As we talked about earlier today, I think we're setting that trend for our county and that's a great thing.

I really am interested in the after action report that comes out because I do think since we were first it was messy and the problem with this messy initiative being a citizen's initiative that was voted on by the public is my understanding to change it, to improve it. It's going to take a new initiative so I'm just throwing it out there now that I would be glad to be part of that process. I think to get something like that passed it's gonna need to be bipartisan and so if any of my colleagues in the future want to once we get that report back get together talk about things that worked or didn't work and maybe bring forth an initiative from this board to be amended prior to 2030. I think the sooner that we do that, the better. Maybe others might disagree but I think that's something we should look at for the future.

The other thing was the public participation was amazing. I had heard that San Bernardino had eight public maps submitted and we had 114 and for those who don't know San Bernardino it is the largest county In the United States, they had eight public maps submitted and we had 114. I just think that speaks volumes to the process that we had. It was probably a little bit too long and I'm thankful for the commissioners that stuck it through. I can see how they could suffer through some burnout. We did lose some along the way and I hope that we can improve the process but still retain The independency that happened.

I found it very ironic and said to some a process I helped get started that I could have gotten drawn out of my own district and at one point there was a proposal on the table that looked like. So, you know, messy of course but that's kind of how this democracy works and I was excited to see the new district. For me getting a chance now to represent even more unincorporated area, that's always been my bread and butter. It's something I've loved. I love unincorporated communities growing up in Orkut. Getting a chance to represent Los Alamos and Vandenberg Village and Tepeski and Sisquauk and Gary. I mean, I'm sure some people see those May not love those things. I love those types of communities, and I'm really looking forward to the opportunity to represent them up here on the dais.

Thank you.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:08 – 2:127 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:08:35

Any other comments? Supervisor Hart, did you have anything. Okay well I wanted to second what Supervisor Nelson said about dealing with this sooner maybe we won't be here in 10 years but we are fresh with the knowledge from this experience and I think to distill that and take it so that we set it up for next time given what we've learned We'll be very important. So I guess that's direction or at least you're hearing from some of us that we would like to do that.

We had COVID and the delay with the census, and I think that was extremely wearing on the committee. And people had to resign. We even had one tragically a death. So it's really something that the people who did this stuck with it. And I think now what our Board of Supervisors feels like sometimes when we're on the hot seat because They were the focus of a lot of intense community feeling.

But the thing that's really amazing to me is 1,700 members of the public government is only as good as people who are engaged in it and I think that just says volumes about Santa Barbara County and I think what's come out is really good. It's well based in the various factors Considered, I feel mourning to lose some of my favorite communities and the people and relationships that I've built up.

I think my district, I probably personally then will have represented more different communities in Santa Barbara County than any other supervisor in history. And I have to say, I'm not going to let go entirely. We do have a courtesy where the supervisor in whose district things lie that person gets to speak first and is consulted but understanding all that I'll have a special interest in these communities that I've represented but I'm especially eager to have more of Goleta and Lompoc is going to be very exciting so It's a new world and a lot of new changes and a lot of questions about the commissions and how we change that up over time, but we'll be learning that in the coming weeks and months.

So with that I think we're ready for a motion of receive and file. Supervisor Hart?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction2:11:19

Yeah, I'll make that motion and I just wanted to thank Supervisor Hartman for her gracious colleagueship in the transition of representing Isla Vista. She's done a great job with her team bringing me along. I do have a long history of involvement in the community of Isla Vista. My first elective office was as a member of the Isla Vista Community Council when I was a student at UCSB so it will be nice to come back Thank you. So let's see I guess there is no public comment on this which is notable for many reasons but so we are ready for a motion and a second.

Second.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:12:17

All in favor say aye. Aye.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:12:19

Any opposed? Passes unanimously. And Chair Hartman, members of the board can I please confirm with the maker of that motion that does include A and B for CEQA as well.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction2:12:29

That does as well thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:12:30

Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:12:33

So now we're turning to departmental item number four would you read that into the record Madam Clerk?

2:12 – 2:237 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:12:41

Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the county executive office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding amendments to the cannabis business licensing fee ordinance.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:13:01

And before you begin, Supervisor Lavanino reminded me that in terms of time we will hear departmental item number four then we'll go into closed session and then we'll come back for the final item on today's agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:13:20

Thank you. Good morning Chair Hartman and Supervisors. I'm just here at Brittany Heaton to present, introduce this item. This is an amendment to the Cannabis Business License Fee Ordinance I have Steven Yee here with me, who I have to recognize and appreciate for doing a lion's share of the work on this effort. He'll be presenting this for you today. I did want to just go into our last slide has our recommendations. I'll pull those up really quick and go over those with you I just want to point out that that first phrase that says on November 2nd staff continues to that was a mistake on my part. This should just say recommend that the Board of Supervisors and then consider our first reading today read the title and waive further reading in the ordinance and then we're setting a hearing for the administrative agenda on January 25th with that, I'd like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:14:22

Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the Board. I'd like to begin today by providing your board some background and context on cannabis business licensing fees. As you'll recall, your board adopted the Cannabis Business Licensing Ordinance Chapter 50 and Corresponding Business Licensing Fee Ordinance in May 2018. As part of the fee ordinance, three unique fees were established in order to fully recover the costs associated with the business licensing team's review of initial applications, review of annual renewal applications and mid-year compliance activities.

The fees were initially established as deposit fees meaning that applicants are charged based on actual hours conducted by the licensing team using the established reimbursement rates for each job classification. The proposed amendments for consideration by your board today are intended to achieve the following objectives. Reflect changes in salaries and benefits for each of the licensing team department's job classifications. This is critical to achieving full cost recovery as the licensing teams reimbursement rates that are currently in place are now three years stale.

These amendments will also adjust the indirect cost rates for each licensing team department. Similar to salaries and benefits, these rates have not been updated since adoption in May of 2018. We'll also be adding County Fire and the Carpinteria-Summerlin Fire District to the reimbursement rate structure as both entities were omitted from the initial fee study and existing fee ordinance.

And lastly, the annual renewal and compliance fees will be converted to fixed fees while initial application fees will remain a deposit fee as staff anticipates very few new initial applications to be submitted prospectively. As part of the fee study that was conducted in order to inform the amendments being proposed today, staff took the following approach to develop fees that provides for full cost recovery for each of the licensing team departments.

First, we performed a thorough review of all available data including a historical look back at the labor hours spent on each application by department for each of the three core review functions previously mentioned. This labor data was then used to arrive at the average time spent on each application. Next staff updated the salaries and benefits costs and indirect cost rates for each of the licensing team departments job classifications to develop updated hourly reimbursement rates Average labor hour assumptions and the updated hourly reimbursement rates by department for each of the three core review functions were then reviewed and vetted by each licensing team departments operational and finance staff to ensure accuracy, reasonability, and full cost recovery.

And lastly, the fee study was thoroughly reviewed by auditor staff who provided their concurrence as to the reasonableness of the fee methodology, equitability of the resulting fees and that the proposed fees do in fact achieve full cost recovery for the licensing team departments. Here we show the initial application fee schedule. The existing deposit fee is currently set at $3,250 and the newly proposed deposit fees now range from $3380 to $5,758. A fee range has been established and varies based on the license or licenses being applied for, the area of operation, and whether the applicant is subject to an energy conservation plan or not.

For example, an operator that is applying for outdoor cultivation in the inland unincorporated area would pay a deposit fee of $5,568. This deposit fee would reflect labor costs for county fire since the proposed operation location in this example falls within their jurisdiction. This deposit fee would exclude the CSD Sustainability Division's labor costs given that the project is outdoor cultivation and is therefore not subject to an energy conservation plan.

But would include the balance of the licensing team's labor costs as they all would have review responsibilities relating to this specific license type application per the business licensing ordinance. For the board and public's reference, the fee schedule is shown in its entirety in both the Board Letter and also in Attachment A. In this next slide we show the proposed fees for annual compliance and renewal applications, both of which will be converted to fixed fees.

The current compliance fee is set at $2,500 but will increase to a range of $2593 to $4276. Aside from the increases due to capturing the licensing team's updated salaries and benefits costs, indirect cost rates, and including the two fire agencies' labor costs. The increase also reflects more robust and proactive compliance efforts by the team which includes regular mid-year compliance site inspections, weekly compliance team meetings, and responding to complaints.

The annual renewal fee is currently established at $3,600 but will now range from $2,803 to $4,989. Again the precise fees charged to any given applicant for compliance or renewal fees will vary based on the type of license being applied for, the area of operation and whether an energy conservation plan applies or not. As another example, an operator that is applying to renew their mixed light cultivation license in the cart bag overlay would pay a fixed fee of $4,606.

This fee captures the Carpinteria-Summerlin Fire District's labor costs since the operation location falls within their jurisdiction and also includes the CSD Sustainability Division's labor costs since mixed light cultivation requires an energy conservation plan. This fee also captures the balance of the licensing team's labor costs since they all have a review responsibility relating to this specific license type per Chapter 50.

Next slide, please. In summary, the existing deposit fee model is not currently achieving full cost recovery due to outdated rates that require updating. The existing deposit fee model is administratively burdensome and costs approximately $60,000 annually for the cannabis program admin staff to recognize revenue to the eight different licensing team departments for each of the three core review functions.

The licensing team will continue to diligently track their time for all three core review functions and admin staff will conduct an annual fee analysis to ensure that the fixed fees are appropriately set and that they continue to achieve full cost recovery. And lastly, we'd like to point out that the fixed fee model is currently used for other processes throughout the county and transitioning to this fixed fee model will provide applicants certainty of the total fees charged for annual renewal application review and compliance efforts.

Again, the recommended actions for your board today are as follows. Consider the introduction or first reading of an ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending and superseding Ordinance 5041, an ordinance establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee. Read the title and waive further reading of the ordinance in full. And lastly set a hearing on the administrative agenda for January 25th 2022 to consider recommendations.

That concludes today's presentation and we're happy to answer any questions. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:21:59

Thank you, Mr. Yee. So Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:03

Yeah I have a question about some of the hourly rates taking a look at the attachment that was involved here. You list out there different proposed hourly rates for the various job classifications and just for example Enterprise Leader $120 Fire inspector, $163. In our planning department, I believe it's $225 an hour or more. And so I'm just trying to understand how we can charge so little for these positions but in our planning, we charge so much.

It just seems that there is some kind of incongruence with our fees. Many of these positions probably make far more than a planner and so I don't understand if this is full cost recovery And so is the planning work. How do we get there? I'm struggling with that. One's not right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:23:06

Supervisor Nelson through the chair, unfortunately I don't have a good understanding as to what costs are included in the planning department hourly rate again for this fee study it's really the salaries and benefit costs indirect costs as well that are included

2:23 – 2:2910 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:23:28

Supervisor Nielsen, I had the same question when we first looked at this and I believe I did have a conversation with Ms. Frapp while I don't know if you heard their full thing and that is looking at the hourly fees for this it's less compared to what we charge in planning development for their fees so can you comment on that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:23:47

I apologize. I didn't hear

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:23:49

all the questions. Thank you. The question is about the hourly rates that feed up into this fixed fee. I'm a big fan of fixed fee. These hourly rates seem very reasonable, but I look at these in contrast to planning fees which are about $225 or more. That's what it was in 2017 when I looked and With inflation since then, so it's much higher. And so trying to understand if that's full cost recovery and this is full cost recovery doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:24:26

Supervisor Nielsen to the Chair. We can look at that. One of the differences on planning is that the support structure that goes into a typical planning permit is more robust than what we have here in the administrative place. So when we're looking at planning's hourly rate, for instance, you'll have a planner 1-2 who was assigned to a project. There are layers of supervision and monitoring of that activity that gets captured in the Planning Department's fees. And so that adds up layers to get to that hourly rate for planning as a whole. What we're trying to do here is really specify just at the position level. There is some overhead, but it's less to a lesser extent and so that keeps this hourly rate down and still allows us to capture it.

So that's kind of one factor. The second factor planning lives outside the general fund and so they capture The cost of the cap, if you were in the cost allocation plan, right? So non-general fund departments contribute to the support. The general fund general departments provide to support them. Not to get into too much detail here but that adds a layer as well to an explanation of why planning's hourly rate as a department is higher. I don't know if that helps. Hopefully I didn't muddy that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:25:58

I think I understood some of that already. It seems like we're using two different models when we do a fee study and this one I support, it keeps fees reasonable and low and fixed which I think is really important. I wish maybe it's aspirational that we took a similar approach in planning in the future but that's not what's before us so thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:26:23

Are there any other questions? I had a couple. The first, I appreciate what you, a little bit you explained the compliance management process that there's a mid-year site visit and then response to complaints and then there's weekly meetings. And could you describe who attends those at least? And what's the agenda how that operates? A lot of people ask me, you know, what is the compliance Enforcement, who's involved?

Is it the sheriff? Is it P&D? So if you could kind of map that out for us a little bit.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:27:05

Sure, thank you Super Chair Hartman. Those meetings are just initiating now in the new year and attendance will be all of the departments that have a role in enforcement or compliance which would be planning and development, the Sheriff's Office, Ag Commissioner's Office, Treasurer Tax Collector, Planning and Development. They all play a role and what we'll be doing is we're going to be using the information that we are receiving through our California Cannabis Authority membership, which is just coming online now. We were successful in getting access to the operator's information and they will start sending us monthly transfer reports That's the second piece to the data on March 1st and so we'll be using that data to start the conversations.

On that end, each department is already doing some of their own compliance right there going out on a regular basis and doing Based on either complaints or they're going out on a regular basis. I know a commissioner's office has a mid-year check in already, and so we're rolling it out. It's just getting started but that is our intention is that anyone involved in enforcement would be attending those meetings.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:28:29

Thank you. And so that's terrific I mean, I think it's an interdisciplinary team and That's that's exactly the way to do it. And I really support that I'm interested in the California Cannabis Authority How much is it that we pay them each year?

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:28:53

Thank you Chair Hartman. The membership dues that we agreed to are $500,000 annually. And so we just paid our first quarter installment for this year. But moving forward, that's what we anticipate is

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:29:10

$500,000. If I remember correctly, we thought the state track and trace system would actually help us and we actually need this to be able to make sense of it. So my question is shouldn't this half million dollars be part of the costs that we recover? In these fees, it's critical to our compliance efforts and we're having to take it out of the taxes rather than out of the fees. So I wonder if anybody else has any thoughts about that?

2:29 – 2:3516 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:29:50

Maybe Mr. Brackwell, any comments on that? Go ahead. Well

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction2:29:54

I would just say that anything we legally can build into the cost recovery structure we should.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:30:06

Chair Hartman on that question you know we have talked to the other counties that are part of the CCA there are eight counties It is a mixed bag. There are, I think it's one or two counties that do recoup the cost of the CCA membership within their fees and there are numbers that don't. I think our thought was in this initial year to as we're rolling this out getting started is to use the Kenos tax revenue as the board approved during the budget development And then look at whether it is appropriate based on your board's direction to then recoup all or part of that through the renewal fee.

So let's say, so I can do some easy math here and not trip up. Let's say the annual cost is half a million dollars and you have 100 maybe 120 licenses. So somewhere you've got 45 to $5,000 per license. So essentially what that does is it doubles kind of what we're asking your board to approve today and we're happy to do that. I mean, we're happy to take your direction and make that happen if that's what you'd like to

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:31:26

do. Supervisor Lavanino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.882:31:30

Well Madam Chair the way I see it well either way the cannabis industry is going to pay for it so I guess what you're asking is if you want them to pay for it before They're growing and before they have income and before they have revenue or would you rather have it taken from the taxes were then they have a chance to actually. You know contribute the ones that are contributing to the ones that are actually in business.

I mean everything that I'm hearing and I think everybody's reading is at the industries and in a state of free fall right now and everybody's struggling. You know, additional burden put on somebody before they actually even get to the point where they're in business. And so I think it's just want to be clear to the public that the industry is paying for this one way or the other and so I think I would prefer to see it paid for those paid out of the taxes in that you know At that point, somebody actually has the ability to start a business and then help us pay for the tax oversight.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:32:42

Did anybody else have any? Supervisor Nelson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:32:46

Yeah, no I think you know the Cannabis Compliance Authority was sold to us that this was going to be somewhat cost neutral. That we were gonna potentially have more revenue come in because we're gonna have that level of oversight And so I think it's probably prudent. You know, I would support maybe in the future if we get to some kind of a level of homelessness that maybe pass that cost on in the fee schedule but I think right now especially as Supervisor Labadino has mentioned this industry is in potential free fall and we are going to receive hopefully more revenue by being in this than I'm comfortable with it being absorbed under the revenue that we're getting through the tax revenue at this point, but I would not be opposed to that coming up in the future when we look at these fees again.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:33:36

Ms. Heaton, did you have a comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:33:38

Thank you Chair Hartman. I think what we can do is take a look at this in a year's time or two years' time when we've stabilized and we've licensed all of the operators under the cap then we know exactly how many operators we have. We could look at the possibility of the scale. You know a larger operation may if we go in this direction may need to pay more than a smaller operation and those are things we could consider and we'd be happy

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:34:06

So I very much favor that. I think it's important if cost recovery, this is a key aspect of our compliance program and they have to pay certain amount of taxes and if more of that has to go into compliance that we're covering then we have less And $500,000 is significant, it's likely to be significant over the next several years. So I'm happy to wait but I certainly want to put this on the agenda for you to think about and bring back proposals if that's agreeable to other members of the board which I think I've heard at least three of us say so.

Are there any more comments? Do we have any public members

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:34:55

who would like to speak, Madam Clerk? Chair Hartman and members of the board. We have no requests to speak on this item.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:35:01

Okay final call and if nobody wants to say anything more may I have a motion? To the recommended action up on the board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:13

Yes chair Hartman I'll go ahead and make a motion That we approve items A through C.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:35:22

Thank you, may I have a second?

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction2:35:24

Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:35:26

All in favor please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Item passes unanimously so now and thank you Ms. Heaton Mr. Yee very fine presentation now will recess to close session County Council will you tell us what's to be considered

2:35 – 4:232 turns

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction2:35:46

today Thank you, Madam Chair. For closed session today we have a conference with labor negotiators under Government Code Section 54957.6. The first is with employee organizations all bargaining units, unrepresented employees, managers and executives and the agency designated representatives are CEO Mia Sato and Human Resources Director Maria Elena de Guevara.

And the second item is Santa Barbara County Board sitting as the board of Santa Barbara County Public Authority for in-home supportive services. The employee organization is the United Domestic Workers of America, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 3930 and the agency designated representatives are CEO Mia Sato and Social Services Director Daniel Nielsen. And the time estimate is about one hour.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.812:36:39

Okay so we will reconvene here at about one o'clock and go now to closed session. 115 Good afternoon. We're reconvening the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting of January 11th, we've just come back from closed session and County Council would you report out from closed session please?

4:23 – 4:425 turns

CommentJoshua MedranoProposed · by introduction4:23:40

Thank You Madam Chair members of the board. The board met in closed session conference with labor negotiators for all bargaining units unrepresented employees managers and executives and also United Domestic Workers of America and the board took no reportable action

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.814:23:55

Thank you. That brings us to our last item on today's departmental agenda. Madam Clerk, would you read that into the record?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:24:04

Chair Hartman and members of the board, Departmental Item Number 5 is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an update on the coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. Thank you and Dr. Del Reynoso.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.814:24:20

Good afternoon, Chair Hartman

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:24:22

and members of the board. I'd like to begin our COVID update with information from our dashboard. Madam Clerk may I have my first slide? As of January 10th, new cases we stand at 630. We are reporting one new death. The death is an individual of 70 plus years of age with no underlying medical conditions. The death was not associated with a congregate care site and this individual resided in the city of Santa Maria.

We are also noting 6,513 active cases. Of that 87 hospitalized. Total cases stand at 58,847 with total deaths at 572. Our current case rate per 100,000 is 187 78. And testing positivity is 26.6 and I would like to note that over the last three days, there were 3122 cases reported to the Public Health Department of Saturday. We had 1,325 which is a new record for reported daily cases. On Sunday we reported 1,167 and then yesterday the 630 so these are all new records for Santa Barbara County positivity rate case rate and active cases reported next And we are hypothesizing that much of this records could be due to the Omicron variant. The sequencing reports from CDPH for the last week of December, from December 23rd to the 29th indicated of the samples were due to Omicron.

We believe that the current levels are much higher as CDC projected, that Omicron stands at about 95% in Region 9 which includes Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada and four or five Pacific Islands. And we believe that because of the Omicron variant in our community, it may account for steep increases that we're seeing as well as our neighbors are seeing. Next This graph describes the Santa Barbara County case rate as of 1-6.

In the last two weeks from December 23rd to January 6th, the case rate has increased drastically at about 405%. We are noting that the alpha surge peaked at 99.4% last January And the Delta surge peaked at 31.2 earlier, or late I should say in the summer in August. So the current Omicron surge, the trend is upwards and again at the case rate of 187.8 Next And this graph describes the case rate by vaccination status as of December 28th.

So overall countywide case rate increase of 446%. So going from a 15.7 to 85.8% But if we drill down, we can see that case rate among unvaccinated increased about 301%. And the case rate among vaccinated increased very significantly among the about 792%. But if we look at the difference in case rate between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated it's about a 2.7 fold.

Which means that in our community, people who are unvaccinated are about 2.7 times more likely to get COVID-19 than vaccinated individuals next. Regarding hospital capacity, we are seeing hospitalization at the cusp at 64.5% almost to the red zone and then with regards to ICU fortunately we are seeing some ups and downs but at 60.5%. Next. This is an interesting graph just to show your board the surge and its impact on hospitalization rates. And so we see that with the first surge in, on July July 29th of 2020, we saw a high of 89 cases with an ICU being at 31. And then with the second surge, we see that the height was at 211 hospitalization and of that 60 In the ICU and with a Delta surge, which is the third search late last summer. We saw a height of 82 hospitalization with 24 ICU and currently with Omicron we're seeing 87 individuals hospitalized and of that the 10 in ICU.

And I also like to note that hospitalized cases have dramatically gone up over the weekend as well We're seeing an increase of about 50% in COVID admissions from a week ago. And again, fortunately we're not seeing this dramatic increase in ICU admissions averaging between six to 10 cases and currently we do have one pediatric hospitalization but not in ICU.

Next. With regards to vaccination rates, we have 77.3% of eligible Santa Barbara individuals vaccinated and we have 69.3%, percent of eligible Santa Barbara County fully vaccinated. Public health continues to offer mobile vaccination clinics throughout the county in various locations. Our calendar for the mobile vaccination clinic clinics is on our website at publichealthsvc.org for detailed information on the dates and locations.

In addition to this, we started another vaccination effort in ivy and tomorrow Next slide, please. The different zip codes in our county and the vaccination rates among those zip codes. So we continue to worry about zip codes that are in the red, like 93117 and 93254. We continue to work with those who are at the zip codes in the red and the orange working with our community partners for outreach and this is a priority Next.

Um, current outbreaks as of yesterday we are currently our team or outbreak team is managing 91 outbreaks 26 are among businesses 11 are in schools and 54 are in various types of congregate living facilities. Next And I'd like to introduce some forecasting slides to your board. The next three slides are forecasts from CDPH, we are sharing these forecasts with your board since we've been asked to predict what the next few months will look like Given the Omicron surge, I do want to caution your board that these are at best rough predictions.

And given the changing landscape of the pandemic we want to say based upon what we know locally they may be very rough predictions but will give us some indication for planning. These short-term forecasts take into account The most recent trends in cases, hospitalization ICU patients and deaths and apply statistical models to that data to generate the anticipated trends for the next four to two to four weeks.

With the volume and pace of COVID-19 data generation, the models or the ensemble predictions. These estimates may contain unexpected results, we may not see the predictions come true. We may see higher numbers in some cases, or we may see lower numbers in others. Also emerging details about Omicron variant may increase the uncertainty of these forecasts. Um, I want to explain that the Ensembl forecast, the solid blue line takes the median of the forecasts available on any given date and fits them all into a smooth line so that we can see a nice clean line for the trending.

So for Santa Barbara County using 94 as the actual hospitalization for January 10th, these Ensembl forecasts for hospitalization through February 10th is 1,043 or an increase of 949 hospital admins. Again based upon our real life experience we are seeing that this may be a very worst case scenario That reality may look different. The factors that can impact this forecast really is a decrease in case rates, increase in vaccination and changes in community behaviors.

Next For ICU, the forecast is based on 46 actual daily ICU patients as of January 10th. The ensemble projection is 786 daily total through February 10th this projection is also a steep increase and when we look at similar projections throughout the state were noting that very similar trends are indicated for Ventura and slow. Next Lastly, this is quite a somber projection about death.

Based on 578 total deaths as of January 10th the projected 30 day forecast through February 1 is a total of 781 deaths which is an increase about well an increase of 203 deaths or 35% increase and again I just want to caution that these are only forecasts That our sense and our sense is that the forecasts project the worst case scenarios based on our case trends are and and hospitalization trends.

But these forecasts can assist us in planning our response efforts next. I'd like to update your board on our current testing efforts. This table represents testing for public health managed testing sites only and that additional testing capacity is available through pharmacies, healthcare providers, independent testing sites and school employer-based testing.

And and also noted that county managed testing sites, we frequently can operate beyond the scheduled testing capacity by providing testing to walk ins. So we have the through for the last three weeks or so we have Noted a higher demand for testing opportunities. So we have expanded our Santa Maria Fair Park beginning next week, we will add an extra day so currently Santa Maria is running Sunday through Thursday 12 hour days. And beginning next Friday, it will be adding Friday appointments. So essentially an additional 528 testing spots a day.

We have a direct minibus at Direct Relief and we moved to 12-hour operations yesterday And so we are there now from 7am to 7pm. And that site delivers 264 tests a day in our anchored by our log poke Healthcare Center, we are opened 830 to 430. So we can we prioritize essential workers and can complete 84 tests a day. And we've added extra appointments as the need arise.

Our Santa Barbara Healthcare Center, we also have expanded hours and our testing trailer is open Wednesday through Sunday 730 to 630 p.m., and we've added these extra appointments through the end of the month. Most exciting, we just heard hot off the press. The state did approve our request submitted two weeks ago for an additional site and we are in negotiation with the facility it will be located in Goleta slash Santa Barbara, it will be open 12 hour days six days a week and we anticipate that they will be able to deliver 196 tests a day. And we estimate that we will be up and running in two weeks.

Appointment no-shows continues to be a problem at all of our sites. So we have individuals booking appointments and they're not showing up, so that really impacts our community's access to appointment. We strongly encourage individuals with appointments at any of our sites to please cancel if you're not planning to take that opportunity to test so other community members can seize the opportunity.

Current turnaround time for results is anywhere from 24 to 36 hours for all sites, and this is based upon the increased demand all through the state. I'd also like to update your board on our efforts to secure at-home antigen tests to distribute for our county. Our five public health care centers ordered 80,000 test kits through our federal partner HRSA. We are anticipating the arrival of these 80, 000 kits Early next week, we will be submitting a request again today. So these are to be delivered to our county on a weekly basis.

The first week of distribution which is anywhere later this week or early next week will be based at our five health care centers and our partner homeless shelters. We do have plans in place To engage CBO's and cities as distribution partners for the subsequent weeks. Next.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈5s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:42 – 4:486 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:42:47

It's OK. Chair Hartman and members of the board, just so Doctor Dober know. So is aware we have a little delay here on our end, I believe we see the next page. It's just a little frozen in Zoom, my apologies.

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:43:03

Okay thank you and I'd like to cover The new guidance from the state on the isolation and quarantine for the general public. So essentially, there are three buckets for individuals who test positive for COVID-19 they must isolate this includes everyone regardless of vaccination status, regardless of previous infection or lack of symptoms. So the recommended action include staying at home For at least five days.

Isolation can end after day five if symptoms are not present or resolving and a diagnostic test is collected on day five, or later, and the results are negative. If the individual is unable to test or chooses not to test and symptoms are not present or resolving, isolation can end after day 10. So you need a test on day 5 be asymptomatic to exit isolation. And we are recommending the antigen tests Next slide, please.

For individuals who are exposed to someone with COVID-19, they need to quarantine if they are unvaccinated or if they are vaccinated and booster eligible but have not yet received their booster dose. The recommended action is to stay home for at least five days after the last contact with the individual that has COVID-19, then test on day five. Quarantine can end after day 5 if symptoms are not present and the antigen test collected on day 5 or later is negative. And if there is an inability to test, and symptoms are not present then quarantine can end after day 10.

And again, masking is key. So individuals will need to still wear a well-fitted mask around others for a total of 10 days and again especially in indoor settings. We do strongly encourage everyone to get vaccinated or boosted if testing positive at any point follow the isolation recommendation that we've just shared. Next. Lastly, for individuals who are exposed to someone with COVID-19 they do not need to quarantine if they are boosted or if they are vaccinated but are not yet eligible to be boosted.

But the recommended action still is to test on day five Wear a well fitted mask around others for 10 days, especially in indoor settings. And if testing positive follow the isolation recommendations that I've just shared and if symptoms develop test and stay home next Lastly, I'd like to share with your board that because of Omicron we will be pushing this communication piece to our community. We need to upgrade our mask. It used to be that we were wearing cloth masks but because of the Omicron We have a new standard and we need to upgrade.

What's good is to wear a surgical mask, this is effective. What's even more effective and better is to double mask with a surgical mask plus a cloth or wear a fitted surgical mask. The most effective and the best scenario is to wear an N95 KN95, AKF94. And note that the masks should not have a valve and all masks should fit snugly tightly covering your mouth and nose and consistently worn appropriately.

That ends my briefing Dr. Ansork and I are available for any questions.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.814:48:11

Okay, board members questions? Supervisor Nelson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:48:18

Yeah I have a question about hospitalizations that's people in the hospital who test positive for COVID correct?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:48:28

Yes they may enter the hospital because of COVID-19 or they may have entered for another procedure and is tested and they are positive so it includes both.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:48:40

Thank you

4:48 – 4:5511 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.814:48:44

Supervisor Lavanino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:48:45

Thank you, Madam Chair on the. On the death number of 572. You know hearing some things that were a little different than what I had thought originally from the CDC just in some latest things do we track on that 572? How many? Of those had comorbidities Anna and of those core morbidities If the patient had two or three or four or five comorbidities, or do we just list it as a death?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:49:19

We used to collect that data from hospitalized individuals. But I am not sure that we have that data available and we are collecting or reporting that data. Dr. Ansour, do you recall?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:49:37

Yes, what we do is we count deaths per death certificate. So the attending physician at the hospital or the primary care physician at home, or the corner for that matter will issue a death certificate And we go by the death certificate. If there's any question, if the patient died from COVID or if the death was caused by one of the underlying conditions I usually get consulted and review the medical record of the deceased at length and in detail, and come to a conclusion whether COVID was indeed the cause of death or not.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:50:31

Okay I think that would be good information to have so It's interesting when you travel now, and I did spend some time out of the state. And depending on where you travel to different states have different guidelines. I'm curious if you know when we look at our numbers how significant the increases are in hospitalizations and death and sickness. You know? Are we significantly doing significantly better than for example, You wouldn't even know that there was a pandemic going on. I mean, nobody's wearing a mask. Everybody is congregating and there's really no social distancing of any type of anything. And I'm just curious at this point if...I know there are strategies to do different things but is one significantly Better than the other, are they experiencing explosive hospitalizations and death?

More so than we are or is it just a different manner of addressing it.

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:51:42

That's a great question, Supervisor Levignino and through the chair. We do have that information on a weekly basis CDPH shares with us how California is doing in comparison with States that are known to have different policies than California. And there is, there's remarkable difference in notably in death. I'm not recalling hospitalization but definitely in death and we are more than happy to bring that back comparison of state data if you'd like.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:52:24

I think it would be helpful just You know, I think there's definitely especially with now with Omicron and another turn up of you know we're really getting we're almost at the two-year point now. I think we're a couple of months away from two years and you know when we look at these forecasts which as you stated possibly worst case scenario but they're still you know we're still putting that information out to the public I just want to make sure that we're looking at, you know it's really hard to face people when there's no end game in sight. And I know it's hard for you as well.

I'm just wondering if there's any... We just went through 15 slides, almost 20 slides. Is there any positive news that you would like to drop on us at all?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:53:32

The fact that we were able to order 80,000 tests on a weekly basis to flood our community I think is a piece of good strategy in managing our COVID response. The fact that we are responsive in expanding other testing sites as well it's another good piece of news

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:53:57

Okay, and then just my last question is I know the CDC I've seen in some press conferences has discussed. The possibility of at least they're having an internal dialogue about whether or not to start looking at a strategy of living with COVID as opposed to trying to squash COVID. And I'm wondering if CDPH is also having those conversations and if so, if Santa Barbara County is also part of that kind of looking at this is something we're going to be living with and we got to figure out a way to live with it that doesn't really impact our lives the way it is right now?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction4:54:35

We started the conversation about how to exit the pandemic, especially when it becomes endemic. I believe that that conversation started and then got sidelined by Omicron so we're back to scrambling in our response efforts But it is on the table and CDPH does cover it, but very briefly lately because of the surge in cases.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:55:10

Well so this is from somebody obviously has no medical background or anything but I'm just as this is something I hear out in the community a lot and just talking to my friends help me explain to them how Obacron is not going to get us to that end game quicker because it feels like if you have a virus that is spreading, I mean as rapidly as this one does with it seems like a lower hospitalization rate or at least a lower death rate than what we've experienced.

Isn't this in some sort of a backwards blessing that everybody's gonna get exposed to it? We're gonna get to the end stage quicker? Or is that, or what's wrong with that thought process?

4:56 – 5:017 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:56:03

I could chime in Supervisor Lavagnini through the chair. That is of course what we are looking at and discussing. Now, the fastest path to get to living with COVID is not necessarily the best path. Our concern right now is that even though, and that is definitely a good thing, that most people who get Omicron, the Omicron version do not end up in the hospital, that the percentage of people who end up in the hospital is much, much lower.

You will remember that I've always touted that 10% of new infections end up in the hospital, another 10% of those end up in the ICU. That is no longer the case. That is by a factor of ten probably less. But if you just have a small percentage of infected people ending up in the hospital, if you multiply this small percentage by a really large number of infections. Then you still come up with scenario where our hospitals will be strained and not just in order to take care of covert but also in order to take care of other diseases. And also, we are seeing a huge number of absenteeism with staff across all sectors. And that is very limiting and very unfortunate.

So maybe I'm digressing a little bit but

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:57:45

I understand what you're saying. And I think we all get that to get to that peak, you're going to have to burn through a lot of disease and you're going to have people that unfortunately have a reaction to that is heartbreaking. But one of the things that I kind of noticed on all these forecasts they all ended at the maximum and it was I'm curious if anybody's looked at You know, what is the so let's say it maxes out on February 6th like we're kind of talking about if we took those charts.

And I know that they're rough estimates but let's say we followed that. How does that stay at a peak for weeks or months? Or is there just as quick downturn after that would you expect? Exactly.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:58:35

That's what we expecting when we look at what happened in South Africa And also in other areas where they peaked already. They're seeing a very, very rapid downwards trend in cases. So this is a very different wave of COVID because it goes up so extremely rapidly and then falls precipitously after peaking. So that's what we are looking at and to use your term, yes the disease will burn through the population at a very rapid pace and will therefore help in the end by creating immunity and by hopefully protecting the vast majority of people of future coronaviruses.

Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.814:59:40

Supervisor Williams?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction4:59:43

Well, I do think that though the less Severity of Omicron is good news. I think the problem is even if you have a factor of 10 less deaths, we end up having 1200 active cases instead of 600 right? Which that's where we seem to be headed. You're still going to have twice as many more people die even with with a factor of ten less So, you know to me the question is do you take seriously the possibility that our number of hospitalizations will go up or not and it's a difficult call because every time we've had one of these peaks. You kind of need preparation beforehand to take the hospitalization seriously if there The number hospitalized, the number in ICU and then the number die that died are also all successive waves after the number of new cases peaks.

And so you we kind of need to make a decision of whether or not to take it seriously beforehand right? And so I'm interested in even if that these projections are off by 50% as a massive number of people that would need to be in the hospital What kind of preparations are taking place for that possibility? So I'm, that's what I'm interested in.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:01:15

And that's a question for Dr. DelReynoso or Ansorg.

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction5:01:18

That's right.

5:01 – 5:116 turns

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:01:21

The the part of part of the preparation is again, making sure that our community has access to both and antigen testing. And we are, uh, we've begun that preparation 2 or 3 weeks ago. The other part of that preparation is to continue our efforts with vaccination. Not only are we continuing with mobile vaccination clinics, but we're also doing pop-up vaccination clinics in Goleta and Isla Vista. And I think the third piece would be to reconvene our hospital partners to have conversations about hospital admissions, to talk about strategies that can protect the hospital environment as well. But I do want to note that I think oftentimes when we have conversations about Omicron it becomes somewhat of a binary conversation that Omicron is mild or If you don't have mild symptoms, you end up with in the hospital with severe outcomes.

I think that there's a third element that often is not discussed is the individuals who suffer with long term symptoms who is not severe enough to be hospitalized but they suffer from a host of ailments and data is emerging That that is a real worry. So I would, I want to say that mild may not necessarily mean that you won't feel discomfort, that you won't be ill or you won't have long-term effects because you may and so again it goes back to testing vaccination isolation and quarantine and working with our community partners to promote and ensure access to all of those.

Supervisor Hart.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:03:24

Yeah, I think that The death projections and hospitalization projections are you know really tough to see? And scary for everybody and we're all hoping that you know by people taking actions and being careful We can eliminate that and reduce that dramatically and I think it is it feels A bit out of control to all of us and I think the general public. But taking action makes a difference, and the numbers are startling. When Supervisor Lavinino asked the question about other states, I thought that's really a great question. And I just Googled it. And so there's big differences between California, Florida, and Arizona. California has almost 40 million people and 77,000 deaths. That's a lot.

But Florida has half as many people, 21 million people and 63,000 deaths. So it has almost as many deaths with half the population as California. Arizona is even worse. Arizona has 7 million people but 25,000 deaths. And then what's really startling, and I heard this on the news this morning and it just made me really pause is if you look at Asia and Oceania, the countries in New Zealand, Australia, almost all of Asia. The numbers of deaths in relation to their populations is truly astonishing. In Australia with a population of 25 million people 2500 people have died that's all.

Japan, 18,000 people died with a population of 125 million. If you look consistently South Korea China Vietnam hugely different much much more similar in those other Asian countries than to the United States and death rates And I think the reason why is, you know, those countries experienced the SARS outbreak and they got kind of a warning shot. And they culturally adapted and then listened to public health officials and changed behaviors. And it became normal to wear masks, you know, and take the precautions that we're asking people to do here.

And nobody's talking about locking down and shutting down and stopping businesses and all of the things that are being spun up as potential responses. We're asking people continuously, consistently to wear masks and now we're finding that and saying you know let's all wear better masks. Let's wear the best mask we can get and we can get masks now and then let's be careful about how we relate to people and what we're doing about distances and things like that so I just think it should be empowering to realize these things make a difference And we're at a moment again, as Supervisor Nelson pointed out this morning in his remarks that seems eerily similar to where we were a year ago and the answer is the same. Let's just all get vaccinated let's get boosted if you haven't been boosted let's wear masks let's do everything we can to help each other and we'll get through this the best we possibly can and other places have proven that it works.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:06:31

Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:06:33

I just wanted to respond to that. You know we look at states, we know that COVID has hit the elderly harder than it has you know the young and you look at California being one of the youngest states in the country versus where do most people retire in the West and the East? It's Arizona and Florida so you know that's the one thing about this is we're looking at numbers and we're trying to draw conclusions You know, there's degrees in statistics for a reason. And a lot of us are amateur statisticians these days trying to figure these things out and draw conclusions from them. And I just wanted to add that to the conversation. And then what's going on in Australia? While deaths have been low has been somewhat catastrophic for personal freedoms and economic opportunity for the people of Australia.

And so you know, there is gives and takes here. There are offsetting decisions that need to be made You know, I think one of the conversations that we're going to continue to have is you know are these masks permanent? I mean is this going to be forever that we're going to continue to be required to wear these or is that gonna be a personal decision that each person needs to make for themselves and I think some point in the future hopefully near future. I like those decisions being made by elected representatives and not by unelected bureaucrats and I understand that they are experts in certain fields But as you've heard from Dr. DeRuonoso, the only thing that she positively can find right now is that we ordered more tests. There's lots of other good news out there but it seems for my perspective with public health officials is that it's more, it's more, it' smore this is what they do and I understand that's what they do but we up here are looking to Push policy to impact the lives of our constituents.

If we wanted to be run by just public health officials, we could do that. It could be a different form of government but that's not what we have here and I'm anxious to get back to owning those decisions just like in our county with Our vaccination or testing requirement. That's a policy that we made, you know I voted against it for our employees but that's something we made and were responsible for at the end of the day and so for me I'm very anxious to get to that point.

I find these slides on ICU forecast, the death forecasts to be reckless and irresponsible. I think that these only promote panic. I think that newspapers will report on these tomorrow and people will be afraid and I think Omicron is omnipresent. We need to start rethinking about the future. Talk to people that have it, seems like a lot of people that have it has very mild symptoms. I don't believe if Omicron would've been the first wave that we'd be where we are today.

It has been the evolution of this virus. I do not know what the next one, I do not know what Omega looks like and that may be worse. That maybe Delta with Omicron That would be really scary, absolutely. But that's not what we're dealing with today and I think we need to start to look at these things in reality. The reason why we are doing social distancing here is because of the health order.

Because that's what is needed to move forward. So, that's my frustration moving forward. I think we need again to begin and have that conversation. Acknowledge Omicron for what it is. It's a mild version of COVID with far fewer health impacts than we've seen in the past. It is a pathway towards natural immunity for many people. I'm hopeful that this might be the last wave that we continue to have these type of regulations in place for.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:10:25

Supervisor Williams?

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction5:10:27

Well, I don't think we need to look at the projections to be concerned. We should just look at the fact that we have a 40% rise in hospitalizations to be concerned. We are charged with the responsibility of public health. 40% rise in hospitalizations for anything should be a cause of concern and preparation and action. And I don't know, you know, any freedom of mine that is being interfered with besides wearing a mask. And I'm sorry, no, wearing a mask compared to the sacrifices of twice as many people dying is kind of a small sacrifice.

You know, I want my kids and I want the society's kids to be able to go to school. I want society to move on. But there's also basic, very easy preparations and moves of safety like wearing a mask. Like getting tested, like isolating if you're positive that we can engage in to be responsible for allowing our society move on.

5:11 – 5:2012 turns

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:11:54

Supervisor Hart. I also want to remind the board too that the impacts of this pandemic are not inequitably spread across everybody in Santa Barbara County and there are many, many people who are feeling this in different ways and much more intense ways. We're fortunate to have jobs that allow us flexibility of being able to do a lot of our work on Zoom, and many of the professional people in our community haven't missed a beat.

I mean obviously there's been impacts on our lifestyle but professionally economically you know the stock market is at the highest markets ever been. Unemployment is trending down, the economy is booming People are going about their business. Americans are not suffering economically in the way that was anticipated at the beginning of the pandemic, but there are many, many people who are suffering a great deal who are on the verge of homelessness, who have had job losses, who are feeling the weight of the inequity of our public health system in this country who are not able to access healthcare the same way other people are. And so I think our policy discussion probably should be focused on that, you know how can we address that inequity and what should we be doing as a board to learn the lesson of the underinvestment in the public health system for the past 10-20 years?

And be better prepared in the future to address that. I think that is in our lane, it's not the public health officers jurisdiction exclusively and we need to figure out a way to resource those things so that the next pandemic and the ongoing pandemic is less impactful to people who are least capable of absorbing that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:13:41

Your light is still

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:13:42

on.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:13:43

So go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:13:43

Thank you Chair Hartman. Back to the first question I asked, are all people being tested going to the hospital? Are those people that are in a hospital for COVID or people with COVID. I actually called my hospital yesterday and checked in. Are hospitalizations up? No. Hospitalizations are not up. Are they up with COVID? Yes. That's where they're having an issue so people who are tested have to deal with them differently because of the protocols. Staffing is also an issue because They send half their staff home and then they have to bring in another staff if you're working overtime, and I get that. That's a stressor out there but we're not seeing hospitalizations for COVID is what I'm hearing from my hospital partner, the largest hospital in our county.

So those are the things that we need to look at the numbers. Yes, numbers go up 40%. I hear that. That's happening in the general population, and so you apply the general population to the hospitalized, you're going to see a 40% increase as well. And so when you're testing 100% of people, you know you're going to get positive cases and that's what we're seeing, I believe, in our hospitalization numbers. We need to look deeper into these numbers and not draw reckless conclusions that just scare people. I think we need to be realist about it. I think we need to be optimistic about it while still preparing

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:15:07

So I think this is the conversation that's occurring in people's living rooms and over their kitchen tables because we don't have all the answers. We have emerged into something that we've never experienced before, and it is these different waves are It can be very disheartening, but we've been preparing to learn and to innovate. And we do have many more tools at our disposal and we have to be optimistic going forward.

I think about our county motto to keep our community safe, healthy, and prosperous. We gotta balance those things and it's not always an easy thing to do. I was thinking along the same lines as Supervisor Hart, and I just thought I would add one little factum to this. And that Texas is about 35% higher than California's death rate and they have a very young population even younger than California.

It translates into about 20,000 deaths in that one state. So it is a big difference I think especially if it's your family. Anyway this debate will continue but I do have a few questions. for Dr. Doreno, so the first has to do with the San Ynez Valley and testing. We really have people calling our office saying many of us are older we can't get to Lompoc or some other place there's not testing at the pharmacies. So my question to you is is the testing trailer that's available in Santa Barbara, can that go on a day to the valley or is there some other way to get the at-home tests? To flood them in the valley at a greater percentage because we're really having trouble there. So what can you recommend?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:17:12

Mayor Hartman, I definitely we cannot move the trailer or the testing trailer from direct relief for a day under contract with the state that has to stay there or leave for at least two weeks to another location. So logistically it would be very challenging however given that we will have access to a significant number of antigen testing. We would love to work with the Santa Ynez Valley partners to be able to supply them with at-home antigen tests for them to distribute Good

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:17:49

well thank you

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:17:50

so

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:17:51

relief is coming. The other question I have is, I'd like you to talk a little bit more about what's happening with schools and then I'd like to contrast that with what's happening with child care because I think we have a crisis in our county for testing and dealing with child care. So first of all then, Howard I know that in Santa Barbara, I think in Goleta that the schools have contracted for testing and so that's working fairly well but could you elaborate?

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:18:27

Yes, starting before schools came back in session for the school year. Our team worked with all the school districts to strongly encourage them to secure testing sites whether to jump on board with a color system through the state that's a free platform and so some schools did do that Some schools chose to do that. In addition, contract with other third party vendors like various ones I can think of and so we are team our school team supports the school counterparts in making sure that they had access to pursue Did a more diverse portfolio for testing opportunities than others, and so we continue to support schools that have outbreaks that end up not having tests.

We have supplied various schools with antigen tests when during outbreak situations but in essence we are We are available should any school district want to pursue again, jumping on the color platform or the other options of that their counterparts in other parts of the county are using. Okay

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:20:02

so um that brings us then to child care. The first question is are there any at-home tests for children under two that have FDA approval?

5:20 – 5:258 turns

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:20:16

I don't believe per CDPH testing for under two is not required. I'm uncertain about whether there are antigen or any testing available that's FDA approved, Dr. Ansor do you know?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:20:34

Yes the antigen tests are not approved for children under two So far, symptomatic children that had to be tested whether they have COVID or another upper respiratory virus have been tested at their pediatrician's office. Which of course is fine under so-called more normal circumstances but with this Omicron rising cases it is not sustainable and We are a little, I agree with you. We are really in a crisis situation with child care especially the under two year olds so it is very challenging and we're looking into one option would be for instance the saliva test that might be easier with toddler The other problem is that child care is not licensed like schools, it's like licensed under the Department of Social Services and they have very different guidelines.

So I'm sure that we will have to tackle this in the very near future and we will bring this up tomorrow on our weekly CDPH meeting for sure.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:21:59

Well, thank you. We're experiencing this in my office with Gina Fisher who has a young child and what is she supposed to do? Her child is sent home with mild symptoms or some other child in the class is positive and this affects the entire class and the families and the siblings and it's not really clear to get them tested so it's very disruptive And it's not just Gina in my office, I'm hearing this from parents of young children everywhere. And they can't work and so the more guidance, the more testing, the more support we can give to the child care would really help the economy and everything else.

So I encourage us to have clearer messaging but also more structure for the testing because the schools have it but the child care doesn't and it leaves people really at sea. I think that's all my questions we're almost ready to go to public comment, but I am getting some texts saying that we would sure like to see some PCR testing in the Santa Ynez Valley if that's at all possible. So I want to get that on the record and hope that you can Figure that out, Dr. Del Reynoso, but thank you for...

Yes,

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:23:33

Supervisor Hartman. So previously when we had the testing trailer if you recall the bus and we moved it all over the county. The state expects us to have a certain amount of testers to be able to support our efforts. So I do understand the need for PCR testing out in the Santa Ynez Valley, and we'll work with the pharmacies and the urgent care centers and our other healthcare providers out there to see if we can come up with something that will work.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:24:11

Thank you. I really appreciate that. Madam

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:24:15

Chair, I did have one more question. Could Dr. DeRinosa speak to the work that she is doing at the jail to address the ongoing outbreak amongst the prison and staff population at the jail? It's been a lot of concern. We have a number of letters from public today about that issue.

CommentMulti-Jurisdictional Solid Waste TaskProposed · by introduction5:24:37

Our team, we have a team stood up in our department to support the jail leadership in the outbreak mitigation. And we actually just met and we are guided by our CDPH experts in congregate living situations about how to mitigate that effort. So we have a draft list of guidelines That is supported by CDPH that we will be sharing with the sheriff leadership later this afternoon. But our goal is to decompress the main jail, support a very intentional and thoughtful movement of transfers to the North Branch Jail in order Basically, end the outbreak at the jail and prevent another outbreak in the new facility.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:25:42

Thank you Dr. Dornish. I see that we have Tracy Makuga, the public defender on the Zoom call too. I wonder if she could speak to the work that her department is doing to potentially reduce the jail population which is obviously another element of the solution to this problem?

5:26 – 5:3413 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed5:26:01

Members of the board, it's a pleasure to be here today. I do appreciate all the work that the Sheriff's Department is doing as well as Dr. De Nirosa's department. We have grave concerns about the health and wellbeing of our clients. Our efforts are into identify individuals that should be considered for early release. As you know we have a very large pretrial population but we do in fact Sentenced individuals in our jail that could be considered for early release options alternative release options and our biggest tool at this point is actually using litigation methods within the court system itself to secure those releases.

We also have a lot of concern for the individuals in the jail that are currently suffering from mental illness, that have now been denied movement to state hospital or movement into our PUF. So for us again it's the litigation it is literally working with probation The district attorney's office, other individuals in the system to try to identify people to get out and to release the population. If you look at the... I think the number is approximately 126 individuals who are sentenced in our jail. If you looked at those individuals and you looked at people that were non-violent offenders for example which there are many, you could potentially decompress the jail by about 20% by seeking early release or reduce settings for those individuals.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:27:43

I know the CEO's office during the holiday period convened all of the public safety partners in the courts in a collaborative conversation about ways to decompress the population at the jail and protect public safety at the same time. And I'm encouraged by that work, want to support it in any way we can as a board and encourage everybody involved in that system to really think creatively about ways to end this outbreak because this is persistent, it's continuing.

People don't have a choice when they're in the jail about their proximity to others and we need to really make this a high priority and I know the Sheriff's Department is working at it but I would hope that if we could do more quicker to resolve this

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:28:36

Okay, seeing no more lights or nods it's time to go to public comment. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:28:45

Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have three requests to speak on this item. And if you are a member of the public and you have signed up to provide public comment on departmental item number five regarding our COVID-19 update please log in now to do so. We will begin with Maureen Earls to be followed by Maria Kestner.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:29:04

Maurene?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:29:06

And if I may

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:29:06

interrupt we'll close the list for public comment then right now

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:29:13

And again, we'll begin with Maureen Earls. Maureen? Maureen I've unmuted you on our end if you can go ahead and unmute yourself on your end and provide your comments. All righty, we'll come back to Maureen. Oh there she goes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:29:49

Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:29:50

Yes yes we can. You're a little low so if you could just speak loudly that would be greatly appreciated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:29:57

Okay great thank you well first of all I want to thank the supervisors for the inspiring opening comments And the including the poem that was read, it does help us in the public feel reassured that there's a cooperative effort. I One, two. I represent CLU. I'm a co-chair of the criminal justice group and we wanted to make public the letter that we sent to you with a call to action and it was based on the lawyers who are observing what's happening in the jail and making sure that we're following compliance for basic humane practices there And so they had in that letter four recommendations that we strongly want the board to consider and see if we can implement. The first is to reduce the jail numbers, which we have already talked about. But it says in this letter that the recent jail rise from 580 to 725 results from triple the number of those accused of misdemeanors And sentenced and low level charged jail residents in those nearing the end of lengthy sentences should be screened and released.

Sheriff Brown should be encouraged to follow the practice of other counties that we have heard about, and use discretion for early release. And thus far, we have failed to do that. Secondly, we need to house mental health patients and those with substance abuse issues in appropriate alternatives. And there was a recent Santa Barbara grand jury report that found underuse of current community mental health crisis beds. That should be remedied as soon as possible.

And the third thing is enable county probation to coordinate risk assessments to recommend discharge and we ask you to you supervisors, to provide the authority and resources so the county probation can do this. And especially implement assessment and release of jail residents deemed not to be a risk to public safety. And the fourth thing is that we look to the North County Jail as a relief from overcrowding, but the lawyers mentioned deep concerns And that they recommended collaboration with their jail remedial plan experts to provide safe staffing ratios up north and required safe transport practices for the North County move.

So we would like to have you consider those important recommendations from the lawyers And prevent another great expense of having to pay for lawsuits instead of putting the money into the community to solve the problem. Thank

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:33:34

you Miss Earls, that is your time and we do have your letters in hard copy all the public comments that are sent we have up here each board member so thank you so much.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:33:46

And we will now go to Maria Kessner who is our final speaker. Maria, we're having trouble understanding you. Is that coming through your computer? If you have another way to call in perhaps to the meeting from the registration confirmation email Yes, we are not understanding. We can pause for a moment perhaps and have you call into the meeting. There should be a number located on your registration confirmation email.

5:35 – 5:4511 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:35:21

Chair Hartman, while we're waiting for the public speaker to get access to maybe a phone or something to call in so we can hear her. Just a couple of things I wanted to clarify. So at the beginning of the meeting you did announce that we are socially distancing today. I just want to clarify that's not a public health officer order and it is not what Dr. Ansork had issued some months ago as a recommendation and because of the high trans Transmission rate of this new version of COVID and because we are all sitting here close together, particularly the board members for a long period of time.

I made the recommendation to the chair that we socially distance. So I just want to be clear that's not a public health officer order. It's a recommendation from Dr. Ansari that we've taken And the second thing is just that people know that we didn't close our buildings. So someone asked me, oh did you close your buildings? No so you know a city around here another county adjacent to us closed their public facilities and we have not done that. Although transmission rate is high we've asked departments to look at their staffing look what they can do virtually to protect the public and to protect themselves but we have not closed our facilities to the public so I just wanted to clarify that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:36:33

Thank you very helpful Are we still waiting for the public speaker?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:36:59

Do we think she's coming back? Chair Hartman and members of the board, the Office of the Clerk of the Board is trying to reach out to her now. I was hoping she could locate that email registration confirmation email with the call-in information located on that but we are just waiting for her to call in yes my apologies for the delay.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:37:18

Sure no we'll wait a few more minutes and then I think we gotta move on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:38:29

Just in case the public is watching and no this isn't still motion we are waiting for a public comment to come on. That's why we're sitting here quietly but I also do want to make a comment on Dr. Ansorg and Dr. Duranos' presentation, you know they are presenting the best information they have and although I may not like Supervisor Nelson agree with the projections that they're presenting, they are from the state and they've been asked to present What they know and rather than derive something, they are taking what the state has presented to them. So I do want to remind us all and it wasn't some years ago that we had a public works department would tell us this is what the PCI is and what our crumbling infrastructure numbers are and some board members didn't like that either.

So, I don't wanna make the congruency to the two but I think your staff is trying to present you the best technical information that's available to them And if there's a better way that we could do it, we're always open to having that discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:39:27

Okay.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:39:30

Is there any indication that she is calling into your office? I

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:39:35

think we've waited long enough. Chair Hartman and members of the board, there seems to be some confusion but she would, member of the public Maria Kessner would like to attempt on her computer again. I'm unsure what happened with the phone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed5:39:51

Okay, can you hear me now? Much better. Please proceed. I just wanted to make some loose comments. I did send in two emails. One is a presentation by 500 medical scientific professionals in Canada and it is about the Pfizer inoculations and I hope that the board is going to watch that presentation. And it's also includes a video and a PDF file. I also sent in response to Dr. Supervisor Hart, 47 Mass Studies, the YouTube channel of Stephen Petty. He's the nation's number one health and safety experts And he has very elaborate breakdowns on mass effectiveness.

And also, I wanted to say some other things really quick. We have some strange news in the media. For example, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson are being accused of funding terrorism in Iraq. Their court case was thrown out at first but it's back in court. We have another thing about Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor who claimed we have over 100,000 children which we've never had before in serious condition on many ventilators.

And the director of CDC Rochelle Valensky was asked to correct this but she refused to correct it but she did confirm that there are about 3500 pediatric hospitalizations from COVID-19 currently We have news on a judge ordered the FDA to expedite release of Pfizer data. Pfizer wanted to just release over 500 pages a month and take 75 years to actually release all the data, and they are now ordered to release 55,000 pages a month because that is paramount to public importance And then yesterday, military documents about gain of function contributed to Dr. Fauci's testimony under oath and these were military documents that Equal Health Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain-of-function research on bedworn coronaviruses and the proposal named Project Diffuse was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the Gain-of Function Research Moratorium And just basically, there's all this information on this pandemic in the media that's not even touched.

But it basically does go back to the fact that we have corporate fascism ruling our government and when Jeffrey Sparks called me last time he was the only one commenting on the COVID report and he was laughed at by some of the supervisors that he dared to call this fascism But we clearly see the FDA is not cooperating. And that is your time. Okay, thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:43:12

Thank you. So with that public comment is complete. We bring it back to the board. Are there any final comments observations? Supervisor Wood Nelson?

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:43:23

Yeah, I just wanted to clarify a couple of where I'm coming from on this if I haven't I'm not saying we're living in a fascist country or that our county hasn't done a good job to still operate. We talked about this morning, we are one of the few bodies that has been able to operate continuously throughout the pandemic and you know I will give credit where credit is due and I want to thank my colleagues and staff for trying to make that happen and Ms. Alexander our clerk of the board has done an amazing job to do I'm not trying to say that our county is failing here.

What I'm trying to get to the point is that, I think we need to change our posture here. You know we're trying to still outrun this virus. We're using techniques you know isolation and quarantine I get, I understand that but at some point we do need a pivot as a county, as a state in the country to living with this. Supervisor Hart was absolutely correct that there's certain populations that are most disproportionately affected by this virus and I would argue it's our children As someone who has three school-age children that have been going through the pandemic, this thing has been awful for our kids.

I'm a former teacher and I hear from my colleagues we had one high school in the Santa Maria Valley last year that half of the student body had straight F's. 10% never showed up to Zoom all year long. We are losing kids. Suicide by our youth is at an all time high This forecast and I'm sorry that this came from the state. But again, I think that this is what's going to get reported in the news. So I know because there's a sensationalization that goes on with this is that we're gonna have our deaths go up by 50% over the next month potentially. And that's a despair that some of our youth, some of our families have a hard time processing.

So I'm hoping we can have a level of optimism. Omicron, yes there is a chance for long COVID and other consequences and lots of risks in this world. We need to manage those risks. I think we need to stop being afraid And that's the posture that I'm hoping that we have that conversation. That's where I'm trying to get us to, that's what I'm an advocate for. I'm not a denier. I've been long said I got vaccinated a long time ago. I have not been someone that is saying that this is a hoax but I do think we need to pivot and change the conversation.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:46 – 5:5410 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:46:02

Supervisor Hart.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:46:03

I believe that perhaps representatives from the Sheriff's Department are available online to talk about the outbreak at the jail, and that'd be great to have their perspective on that.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:46:18

So we yes. Is it Sheriff Brown?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed5:46:26

Yes, supervisor Artman chair and also other board members I'm happy to give you an update if you'd like on the situation.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:46:34

Please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed5:46:35

In the jail, so as you're aware we've had a outbreak this is the third outbreak that we've had in the jail it began in December and since that time we have had a total of 208 active cases where inmates have been infected with the virus Of those, 136 inmates have recovered to date. We have 68 active cases at the moment. Four inmates have been released from the total which will get you to the 208.

Of the 208 cases so far only 38 of them 18% have been symptomatic in any way. The other cases are all asymptomatic And no indication that they even had the virus other than the surveillance testing which we did to find out. Of the 38 symptomatic cases, all but one of them have been mild symptoms, flu-like symptoms. One has had a more serious reaction and was taken to the hospital and is currently hospitalized.

One inmate refused to answer whether or not they were having any symptoms And of the 208 cases, 135 of those inmates were unvaccinated and 73 of them were vaccinated. So roughly two thirds one third. We have also had a challenge with a number of our staff members being either infected with the virus themselves or being exposed, or being in close proximity to someone who's had it.

And which has caused them to have to go into an isolation situation so that staff at the jail have been doing an incredible job of handling shortages that are occurring as a result of this situation. We have put together a very comprehensive plan On movement for inmates from a number of inmates from the South County Main Jail to the new Northern Branch Jail.

We were going to do that this past weekend, we were in direct consultation with the Public Health Department and we as you heard have received communication from Disability Rights California and we're in consultation and discussions with them and with their experts that they have assigned to the litigation. As a result of all of that, we were asked to delay the movement of inmates and the public health department and our people are working. In fact, we're going to have another meeting this afternoon To try to put some final parameters on this, our hope is that we will be moving inmates no later than this weekend from the main jail to the northern branch jail.

And we feel that we will have a better ability to manage inmates for two reasons. One is we'll decompress the number of people in the main jail in South County. We will also be able to utilize Design of the jail which has instead of antiquated barred cells, it has cells which are floor to ceiling glass in many cases. And a much better position to be able to contain the virus and have people isolate in cohorts that are smaller and hopefully will allow us to get a quicker handle on this situation.

With respect to, I could tell you, I could give you a few more factoids if you'd like. One is that we've implemented an incentive program in the jail to encourage inmates to receive vaccinations and have had a pretty good response from inmates with a nominal Credit given to their commissary fund. And as a result of that, we've had 148 inmate vaccinations since that program was put into effect. Additionally over the period of time that's occurred to date our WellPath medical partners have administered a total of 630 vaccinations in the jail since the time of implementation.

So I'm happy to answer any other questions. I'm also happy if you would like to respond to some of the concerns that Clue sent you in their letter, we are already implementing many of their recommendations have been for some time and are about to recommend or about to implement others but I'll leave that to you if you wanna hear that.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:52:02

Supervisor Hart, do you have any follow-up questions? I

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:52:04

just want to thank Sheriff Brown for the innovative incentive program for inmate vaccinations. I think that was a very creative solution and I think that's the kind of innovative effort that we're looking for. And I believe that Chief Heitman may still also be on line too and I know she works very closely with the courts. I've been told that a significant number of the increase in the population at the jail Is related to change in policy regarding warrants and failures to appear, and that some of the folks who are recently added to the jail population have been cited for those kind of warrant violations. And maybe she has some insight into the work that the courts are doing with the other public safety partners about perhaps addressing that in a creative way given the current situation with the outbreak at the jail.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:53:00

Chief Heitmann. Yes, thank you Chair Hartman, Supervisor Hart as the sheriff indicated there are a number of different strategies that we are being explored were aware that earlier on in the pandemic, a lot of the lower level warrants were site released and more recently those are being held so we are engaging in discussions about Being able to calibrate that, if you will. So that there is an opportunity to hold those that are actively avoiding going to court or dodging their court appearances while also using pretrial supervision and other resources as well as our mental health navigators support systems to further release individuals that perhaps are inclined to go to court but just need additional supports in order to be successful in doing that.

CommentMaria KestnerProposed · by introduction5:54:11

Well, thank you Chief Heitman and I think that points out that there isn't a single solution but there are a lot of different individual incremental pieces that can make a difference and I appreciate all of the public safety partners working together to do the best they can to mitigate the risk in the jail.

5:54 – 5:575 turns

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:54:29

Okay, so with that may I have a motion to receive and file?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:54:38

So moved. Second.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:54:40

All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay, so that's the close of the business agenda. We'll be adjourning today's meeting in memory of those who tragically lost their lives in the January 9th 2018 debris flow and Supervisor Williams has some remarks for us

CommentMaria KessnerProposed · by introduction5:55:07

We had a humble, if moving ceremony on Sunday. Ringing of the bells throughout the community of Montecito and lighting candles for each of those that we lost. And I can tell you, and I especially want to aim my comments at any of the friends or family of those that we have lost. This community very much remembers And it is still something that we think about, something we try to make some sense in this universe about.

But perhaps more productively, we think about for the future of how we can have a more resilient community How we can make investments in our infrastructure and our emergency response system that will prepare us better for the emergencies that are to come. And that is the resolve of this institution, the county. Is I think the resolve of the employees, whether or not they're in a public safety department. They know that they are emergency workers. We are all emergency workers if we sign up to be an employee of the county and And we are all charged with preparing that future Whether we're an engineer designing a debris basin or an emergency manager preparing scenarios at the EOC, or whether we're a worker in probation or social services that ends up staffing the EOC in an emergency.

So I definitely want to remind the friends and family that we are still with you. We remember It will inform our work going forward and our resolve to be a more resilient community.

ElectedBob NelsonChairProposedvoiceprint 0.815:57:48

Thank you, Supervisor Williams. We who live through that will never ever forget. And with that we're adjourned to Tuesday January 25th 2022.