BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 14, 2022

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:04 – 0:073 turns

Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Good morning and welcome to the April 14th, 2022 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. This is our third and final day of budget workshops for the fiscal year 2022-23. Madam Clerk will you please call the roll? Supervisor Lavenino? Here. Supervisor Williams? Here. Supervisor Hart? Here Supervisor Nelson? Here And Chair Hartman? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈20s recited, not transcribed
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:09

Please stand and join me in the pledge

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:29

CEO Miyasato, do you have a report today?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:32

No report this morning.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:34

Madam Clerk? Chair Hartman and members of the board I do have a couple quick announcements this morning. I'd like to remind the public that on Tuesday April 12th we continued the special issue on maintenance and capital projects to today's budget workshop agenda and that will be heard after the policy and executive functional group and before the special issue on digital transformation update.

Additionally, I would like to remind the public that the Board of Supervisors meetings are being interpreted and broadcast live in Spanish. We're broadcasting our meetings in Spanish both for Cox Cable subscribers in South County as well as Comcast cable subscribers in North County. Members of the public can now view our meetings in Spanish by turning on the secondary audio programming also known as SAP or SAP under their language settings.

That information is currently being provided through the TV scroll. Lastly, I would like to remind the public who are participating in our meeting today of the board's updated methods of public participation. For the Board of Supervisors' methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of the agenda.

Members of the public can attend the meetings in person both in Santa Barbara Board Hearing Room Chambers as well as the Santa Maria Board Hearing Room Chambers. Please note the board is following all local and state guidelines and are no longer requiring face coverings indoors. If you attend the board meeting in person, you will no longer be required to wear a face covering but please be advised that the Public Health Department is still strongly encouraging all county staff and members of the public to mask and socially distance themselves in crowded areas.

I would also like to remind the public that if you require any special accommodations please contact the clerk at the board to make that request preferably on the Friday prior to the board meeting Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment virtually may do so via zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing important information about joining the virtual meeting Once the chair has announced the item you want to comment on, please join the meeting with the information provided.

You'll be placed on mute until it is your turn to speak. The clerk will call you by name and when removed from mute, you will hear a notification that your line has been unmuted. If you are using a touchtone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself. Each person may address the board for up to three minutes and this is at the discretion of the chair.

If you have any questions, please contact the clerk of the board's office at area code 8 0 5 5 6 8 2 2 4 0 again That's eight zero five five six eight two two four zero that concludes my announcements for this morning.

0:07 – 0:072 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.807:14

Thank You madam clerk so that brings us to the business of the day which is To look at the policy and executive departments and then turn to our special issues We will have public comment at the close of each functional group and then after each special issue. And our general public comment will be at the very end of the meeting. So with that, our Assistant CEO Nancy Anderson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:41

Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the board. Today we will be hearing the last functional group policy and executive.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:49

We do have a change to announce on the agenda. The maintenance and capital project special issue was deferred from Tuesday to today. It will be the first special issue heard after the functional group. The second special issue to be heard as indicated was a digital transformation update and to be followed by the ARPA funding update. Board members have submitted a few board inquiry forms, staff are diligently working on those and we hope to have those to you sometime this morning. You also have two document updates provided to you today. One is an update to the CEO presentation to add the expansion request related to the Waterfront Infrastructure Feasibility Study. The other is an update to the Expansion Request Table, your tab three that includes the new requests and provides updated CEO comments for consideration as the board discusses those items later today.

Paul Clemente is ready to present the Functional Group Summary if we are ready to proceed.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.808:42

Mr. Clemente?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:45

Thank you. Good morning Chair Hartman, members of the Board. The Policy and Executive Functional Summary Group is 27% of countywide GFC. This is in large part due to the General County Programs Department which receives GFC for a wide variety of programs and policies including cannabis revenues, 18% maintenance funding, and Northern Branch Jail Operations funding before these are transferred out to departments.

The group makes up 6% of operating expenditures at 76 million dollars and is 2% of the county's full-time equivalents, the FTEs at 109. For operating revenue and GFC, what jumps out quickly is the operating revenue in CEO which is due to the risk fund being in the CEO's department as well as ARPA revenues which come into Department 12 before being expended or transferred out. So those are those large jumps you see there.

General County programs, the GFC increases we see there are driven by the programs I mentioned on the prior slide. Here we see expenses that mostly mirror the revenues on the prior slide, with the exception of general county programs. As I mentioned it receives the GFCN and then it transfers that out to other departments for prioritized programs and board policies.

Transfers are not an operating expense so they don't show up as a operating expense on this slide. Finally FTE is a mostly fat flat in Board of Supervisors and County Council as CEO's office has had increases over the prior years for additions for a variety of positions such as the cannabis program being stood up a couple analysts and Positions and risk and others and Wes can speak more to those when he walks through those CEO slides later that concludes

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8010:52

OK, so turning to County Council Rachel Van Molen. And her team.

CommentRachel Van Molen CountyProposedself-stated11:20

Good morning Madam Chair, members of the board. I'm Rachel Van Molen County Council and in over 20 years working for counties, I've realized that most people don't know what county council does and they don't have any idea what the county council team does for the county. When I say that I'm an attorney for county council and I work for the county, people automatically assume I work for the district attorney or a public defender. And I say no, I do public law for the county So they ask, you mean like when someone sues the county? I say yes among other things but we also advise the county departments.

Usually the next question is how many attorneys do we have in our office? When I say 32, people tend to be surprised and say really does the county get sued a lot? And I say it happens from time to time. So for the benefit of the public today, I'm going to spend some time providing an overview of what our office does at least what I can cover in this short timeframe Since we are an internal services department, our clients are your board, the CEO, all the county officers and departments you've heard from this week, and special districts.

Our work is sometimes invisible to the public. We are the county's in-house council. We are an internal law firm. And we divide our work into two categories. First, we support county departments by advising on legal requirements so that they can provide programs and services to the county. And we protect the county treasury by litigating. So I'm going to come back to these categories in a few minutes.

Despite some unusual challenges, your county council team had an exceptional year. We litigated large time-intensive cases. We continued to litigate our ongoing calendars, child welfare, probate, assessment appeals, conservatorships. We supported major county programs such as cannabis and the COVID-19 response. And we did all of this while balancing all of the advisory requests we get from county departments.

COVID did change the way we do business. It increased our litigation backlog due to COVID court delays. We spent a lot of time on COVID-19 response, including review of over 100 health officer orders and continuous changing legal requirements. We transitioned our litigation from in person to remote and then now we are transitioning back again. And we are very deliberate about staying coordinated with our weekly meetings Our operating budget is $11,648,600. More than 9.6 million of that is general fund.

We have no service level reductions and I thank you for that and no expansion requests. I do want to take a moment and thank CEO Miyasato and Budget Director Nancy Anderson for helping us work through some of our budget issues that used to make our budget more complicated. And a few years ago as we switched to general fund, that's made things a lot easier for our office. And I especially want to thank Wesley Welch and Paul Clemente for support throughout the year in answering questions as we've gone along.

So you're going to see this displayed in a few different ways over the next few slides, so I'm not going to stop on each one. But it's just demonstrating that most of our funding comes from general fund and we use all of those funds for legal services. But I'm going to break that down a little bit and explain a little more what our 43 employees do. So first category, we support county departments We do this by reviewing and advising on hundreds of contracts and grants, resolutions, ordinances, assisting on real property transactions, land use permitting enforcement, and advising on capital projects.

The majority of items that come to your board on a weekly agenda go through our office for review. We also support county departments through litigation. More than half of our attorneys litigate full time This litigation protects the county treasury. Sometimes we are bringing in revenue with our three attorneys and legal office professional that do assessment appeals and bring in property tax dollars.

Sometimes we protect the county from having to pay out funds when it's not warranted, such as our jury trial success for a breach of contract case where they were seeking over $2 million in damages. Because of the types of litigation we do, some of the attorneys you don't see very often. And some of our litigation does go to support county departments such as our four attorneys and three legal office professionals that support social services litigating an average caseload of more than 700 dependency cases.

Each one of those cases represents a child that Social Services is helping. We also have approximately five attorneys and three legal office professionals that litigate 45 cases ongoing. And I say approximately because the cases, we resolve cases and more cases come in. These cases are personal injury and civil rights, employment and property rights. These cases are time intensive, involve a lot of discovery and often last for years.

But this past year we resolved 23 of these types of cases with 83% no payout by the county and the remaining four a total payout of less than $75,000. We also have three attorneys and a legal office professional defending your board's policy decisions. And that includes prevailing or obtaining dismissal in 12 land use cases this past year. Because our advisory requests come from 20 different departments, the CEO, multiple special districts, your board and your staff, our advisory work is always changing.

And as I mentioned, our litigation fluctuates as well. So while half of our attorneys litigate full-time, many of our attorneys litigate cases and also advise departments.

0:17 – 0:237 turns

CommentRachel Van Molen CountyProposedself-stated17:50

For instance, our current attorney assignments include an attorney that advises the auditor and treasurer tax collector on all things financial, also advises the elections division, reviews contracts, advises the historic landmarks advisory commission, and helps the county file a claim if we need to seek bankruptcy. We have another attorney that advises the Sheriff's Department, reviews contracts for social services, litigates land use cases and personal injury cases, and is the primary attorney for Southern California Edison.

Another attorney advises Public Works Transportation, sits with the Montecito Planning Commission, advises flood control, reviews software contracts for multiple departments, and handles federal and state litigation. And my last example, I have many but I just picked a select few. Is the deputy that litigates bail bonds, writs petitions for the Sheriff's Department, probate cases for the Public Guardian, advises probation and works with nine Brown Act committees including the Ag Preserve Advisory Committee, Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board and the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council.

We met all of our Renew22 goals, including financial resiliency. We did this in part by implementing innovations from InnovateSBC. We had almost 25% of our staff attend Innovate SBC this year and we are very proud of our retention rate. This past year it was 98%, so we had another strong year and we sought and implemented feedback from the CEO and county departments We also met or exceeded all of our performance measures.

Our goal is to resolve litigation at 85% or less than the amount we reserved for that case, and we are estimated to end the year at 90%. Our goal is to resolve 60% of our cases with no payout. And as I said before, we exceeded that at 83%, and we completed 100% of our employee evaluations on time. Since my appointment last year, this is my first chance to publicly thank you for the opportunity to serve as your county council.

I want to thank Chief Assistant Amber Holderness and the rest of the County Council team for their support and hard work this past year. It really has taken the whole team to have the Office of County Council have a smooth transition in a successful year. What I love about this job is that as legal professionals we always have the opportunity to learn and grow. As you can see, we have plenty of variety and there's always something new.

And working for the county gives us all an opportunity to have an impact every day and do work that we're proud of. So that brings me to my quote, that you cannot get through a single day without having an impact on the world around you. What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make. And with that I'm happy to answer any questions.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8021:00

Thank you. Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed21:04

Well thank you Chair Hartman. It's also an opportunity for us to publicly thank you for applying for the job, Rachel. You've done a fantastic job I think your presentation here today is a good reminder not only to this board but the public and the county about the impactful work that your office is doing. Mike was very beloved by everyone but you've stepped in and I think it's hard to do but exceed expectations so thank you Rachel and thank you County Council team

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8021:33

Thank you. And I just wanted to add, I learned something. I didn't realize what a broad portfolio each attorney has and that really does make it exciting but you have to really hustle to learn all those different areas of very complex law. Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8821:54

Thank you Madam Chair and you mentioned something at the beginning that a lot of what you do is invisible work or at least to the public But I can assure you that it isn't invisible to us and to other department heads. I always think it's humorous that we go into closed session for like two hours, and we come out, and the phrase no reportable action is always given like we didn't do anything. But it's because of your hard work and the skill of your team that we find ourselves a lot of time with no reportable actions.

All I can say is keep up the good work. You have an amazing team around you and I always just like, I would say almost without a fault with our department heads in our CEO's office that we get approached all the time weekends at night those kind of things from constituents raise concerns. A lot of times it does have a legal angle to it You know, I always feel like I can call you at any time. All of our department heads are so good at responding and just a joy to work with. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8023:03

Supervisor Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed23:05

Yeah, I just want to echo the comments of my colleagues. I'm just so grateful for the work that everybody in County Council does on behalf of the county but personally I want to thank Ms. Van Molen because More than one occasion, I've created a little crisis on a Friday afternoon and she has just without hesitation stepped into that. And I know it's not just her, there are other... That my crisis turns into her crisis which turns into all of your guys' weekend work and you know I get things on Sundays that are super responsive and help me answer constituent questions and I'm on a regional board we're having a crisis right now. I really appreciate the extra work that you put in to help with that I just know every time, and I don't overuse it.

It may seem that way at times but I do restrict myself. But when I do call and push the bat line number, I know that you're gonna be there as soon as needed so thank you.

0:24 – 0:3210 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8024:01

So I guess that's all. When people ask you, it's the best law firm in this state. Thank you Madam Chair, members of the board. So turning now to the Board of Supervisors, CEO Miyasato.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:18

Board members this year the board has a status quo budget and I've asked Wesley Welch the business manager for the county executive office and for the board offices to present the budget. And while he's walking over there I do want to first of all recognize your board and also talk about Invisible Work thanks to your board chiefs of staff and your board aides We work day in and day out serve our constituents problem-solving connect residents to the Wright County resource So we just want to say thank you to them and all their hard work In the past and in the coming year, I also want to note something that I've said before And that's that when I look around other counties and other counties at some of our employees have gone to this board never went fully remote in the last two years and I a couple of newspapers picked it up.

But I really want to emphasize why that was important Even though you socially distanced, you wore masks. At times some members were in Santa Maria, some were here at times somewhere on the dias. And somewhere down below, as we lovingly refer to as the pit. You continued, you stuck it through and that continued your personal rapport, your relationships and even as you disagreed with each other, you were always civil and committed to working on the best solution. And so as Supervisor Adam used to say, you continue to ride for the brand.

And that's made us a better brand and I think it reflects in next year's budget. So thank you and I'm gonna hand it over to Wes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed25:42

Thank you, Mona. Good morning Chair Hartman, members of the board. I'm here to present the Board of Supervisors budget for the year. The board's budget does include six budget programs, the five districts individually and a board general program that encompasses items that do not fit in any specific district. Key challenges and emerging issues for the board this year include ensuring long-term financial stability of the county while addressing community priorities and compliance with mandates.

To continue working towards a more inclusive and equitable future for the county, to ensure resiliency in addressing our water supply and drought conditions as well as changing climate impacts, and to continue to adapt to new district boundaries with new constituents and community partners added through redistricting. Our COVID-19 impacts. We work with state, federal and nonprofit partners to advocate for and implement COVID-19 relief and recovery programs for businesses, individuals, tenants, property owners and underserved communities.

Work to ensure accuracy and transparency of information related to the COVID- 19 public health crisis and ensure access in Spanish and Enhance public safety by facilitating equal and easy access to COVID-19 testing and equitable and efficient access to the COVID- 19 vaccine. Continue to cover in person from board chambers both in Santa Maria and Santa Barbara providing ease of electronic access to the public.

The budget summary The operating budget is $3.9 million, it is entirely funded by general fund contribution. It supports 19.62 FTE. As Mona indicated this is a status quo budget with no service level reductions, no restoration requests and no expansion requests. Source of funds 100% general fund and that is split amongst the five board offices in the Board General.

Staffing summary remained relatively flat for the past five years at approximately 20 FTE. Operating revenue and general fund contribution, again 100% general fund. It's crept up with salaries and benefits, other charges. Anticipated accomplishments The board has made significant investments to address homelessness through services, programs, encampment cleanup and creation of temporary and permanent units.

The board has funded a study to investigate options to provide housing to county employees, funded part of the acquisition of the West Mesa of the San Marcos foothills and allocated funds toward additional trail acquisition throughout the county. We're moving forward with the first ever County Recreation Master Plan and have provided businesses and rental assistance grants and expanded economic and regional opportunities at Vandenberg Space Force Base.

In the coming fiscal year, the board will continue to work with the community on recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic efficiently and effectively use public resources and maintain the long term fiscal health and sustainability of our county Continue to support and enhance economic vitality in Santa Barbara County. Continue to develop proactive solutions to the homelessness crisis, and finally continue the 18% maintenance plan previously adopted by the board.

No service level reductions. And basically in summary, the Board of Supervisors works to provide quality public services to the people of Santa Barbara County in response to their need for a safe, healthy and sustainable environment and to establish and maintain a workforce which reflects the diversity of the community. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8029:33

Thank you. Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed29:37

Yes thank you Chair Hartman. You know this department You know, being a previously staff member as Chief of Staff and now serving on the Board has been something I've always kept an eye on because that was partly my job before I moved up the seat. And you know, I really understand how important it is the different functions that come from our board offices. Not only do we have the policy and the judicial responsibilities and the executive responsibilities but the constituent services that we end up providing for our Our residents, you know especially in an incorporated area our offices tend to be and as I like to tell people. You know we're the city manager mayor City Council all rolled into one sometimes public works director too so with that you know the allocation of funding for the board offices you know has because Fluctuated over the years and sometimes based on some on demands now that we've gone through redistricting.

Is there any plans to? Look at those those numbers and making sure that each office has resources to properly address the needs of their constituents

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:43

Supervisor, we have started looking at that and I'll let Wes provide more detail, but I believe there's a meeting next week

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed30:50

That is correct, Supervisor Nielsen to the Chair. We will be having a meeting next week to ensure that all of our constituents have equitable representation through their board offices. Okay thank you

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8031:03

and I just wanted to add one point to that did a little work looking at how many new constituents each of us has people who didn't vote for us but they find themselves with us and that we have to get to know So D1 has about 3,500 new constituents. D5 has about 8,000. D2 has about 27,000, D4 has about 46,000 and D5 62,000 so it looks to me like D4 and D5 have a lot of work and I know D4 has more unincorporated than it's had before so I think there is an argument for D4 and D 5 At least for this year to have enough resources to deal with these new, this transition in a smooth way.

Supervisor Lavinino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:00

Are you sure I have 62,000 new people?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:04

You have 8,000. Okay, I thought you said D5.

0:32 – 0:4819 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:12

Okay. Oh, so you went backwards. D54321.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:16

I went in order of the least.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:18

The least? Okay. I was like there's no way I have 62,000 new people. No, I had

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:21

to do that

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:22

myself. You picked

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed32:23

up some San Luis Obispo County?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:24

I was like yeah, I've got to take another look at those lines because this is about 50,000 people I haven't met

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:29

yet. But I have 60,000 and Bob has 46,000. Yeah,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:38

I understand. That's an interesting point. I think there's a million different ways you could look at this And I'm sure Wes is going to do a great job of listening to everybody's issues and then coming out with something That's equitable, and I would imagine it's something that we would have to approve as a board Or is it would just be a policy action or?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:56

We would come back to your board if there was any changes to your district budget

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8033:04

No other lights Just a big smile from Supervisor Hart

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed33:10

Counting all those 27,000 new people.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8033:14

Okay. I think, Wes, we're done with that one. Thank you. So turning now to the CEO's office. CEO Miyasato.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:29

Good morning Chair and Board Members. I'm going to start this off and then I'm actually going to give Wes Welch an opportunity to do our budget because he prepares it every year. And but I'd like to start off by starting with the end in mind and opening with our quote. You don't have to go to it, but I'm going to open with our quote and that is vision without action is merely a dream.

Action without vision just passes time. So vision with action can change the world. And I think that's why all of you are supervisors today. That's why all our staff are here working for the county to change the world. And the CEO's office is charged with executing your vision Sometimes it's five visions, sometimes it's one vision. Sometimes it's 10 visions!

But we work in part with and through our departments and doing it in a way that ensures financially sound operations, and that's why we're here today. A dynamic organizational culture, and that's why we introduced Renew 22. We manage risk through our Risk Management Department division, respond to emergencies through our OEM, and keeps the core processes of a democratic government functioning.

And that's why we're here today with our Clerk of the Board. So I want to take a moment to thank our CEO staff and not just for this past year in the year to come, but for the last two years. And we've so if you don't mind, I'd like to take that opportunity now. We've been led by our able and talented assistant county executive officers Terry Nisich, Jeff Rathwell and Nancy Anderson and our division heads and their staff Greg Milligan who is our new risk manager and his whole risk management team Kelly Hubbard and are ever ready for action OEM team Jacqueline Alexander and the always helpful clerk of the board staff including their 16-pound mascot Chase.

Chase the dog, I'm sure some of you have met her already. Paul Clemente in the ever analytical and inquisitive budget team. Brittany Heaton in our very busy cannabis licensing group. And board members, I want to let you know that our target next year is issuing 100 licenses as well as Lindsay Walters who helps oversee health and human service coordination and Jasmine McGinty our legislative coordinator who takes on everything we throw at And of course Wes, our business manager. Anthony Sandoval, our accountant and of course Kathy Chizik who keeps the team organized and on time most of the time. I wanted to say while my department staff had people leave during COVID like all departments we also gained employees from other departments and city governments so we benefited from their losses So thank you to George, Tanya and a half thank you to Daniel because while we took one of his staff he took two from us.

So we do a lot in the county executive office as many of you know we work closely with the board and Wes will describe some of the things we've done and what we plan to do next year but we can't do everything. And Barney Meleckian is in my ear every morning when I think what he always says was we can do anything but we can do We can't have all the staff that we would like or all the resources we feel are necessary, even though my staff constantly asks me for more. But we strive to do the most important things well to execute on your behalf.

And we believe our budget next year reflects that. So without further ado, Wes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed36:48

Thanks again, Mona. So the CEO's budget, as Mona described, is broken into three main budget programs. County management, emergency management and risk management. Some key challenges and emerging issues for our office next year will be developing long-term strategies and policies to maintain service levels, and ensure fiscal stability. To ensure the delivery of countywide services and communications in a culturally competent and linguistically appropriate ways to meet diversity equity inclusion and accessibility needs. To ensure compliance and accountability for mandates and funding Recruiting, maintaining and developing staff and advancing effective secession planning. And finally changing organizational structures and processes to proactively adapt to new circumstances.

COVID-19 impacts. We dedicated ongoing executive staffing to the oversight of county pandemic response and recovery efforts. We've increased our responsibility to administer the CARES and ARPA funding We've utilized enhanced technology to provide services to the community and to accommodate hybrid work capability. We've developed positive relationships in proactive communication with chamber and businesses, and have advanced efforts to facilitate public access and improve language accessibility through public materials and translation services for board meetings.

Our budget summary, as Paul mentioned, our operating budget is $57 million. This is the majority of which is in our risk management division insuring the county. Our general fund contribution is approximately 7.9 million. This supports 46 FTE. We have no service level reductions, no restoration requests and there is a hundred thousand dollar expansion request which I will get to later in the program.

Source of funds. 50 percent of our funds come from risk management, and these are basically charges out to our county departments to cover their general liability workers' comp and unemployment insurances. Another big chunk of our funds recently have come from intergovernmental revenue pandemic related revenues such as ARPA, the emergency rental assistance program, et cetera. And then our general fund contribution makes up the bulk of the remaining Risk management again, 77% usage of our operating budget. Again and this is just basically funds in from the department, funds out to our insurance providers.

Staffing summary, we have shown some increase over the last few years with some board approved positions. Specifically from the 21-22 adopted to the 22-23 recommended, we are going to have a net 2 FTE increase. This basically consists of the four positions that have been added during the current fiscal year. A Chief Information Officer, a Compliance and Accountability Officer and two ARPA funded Outreach Coordinators.

We did lose two positions that were with the CSB TV function that will be transferred to general services in the coming fiscal year. As Paul mentioned in the overview, the thing that jumps out on this slide is the large increase in operating revenue the last two fiscal years and again this is primarily pandemic related sources of funds such as ARPA. Anticipated accomplishments For the second or third year we've led the COVID-19 emergency response, fiscal and budgetary recovery and organizational resiliency efforts. Some specific things that we have done have included a Health and Human Services Community Recovery Plan, an ARPA plan performance report on our website. We've obtained some state microbusiness grant funding and coordinated COVID- 19 safety efforts and ensured compliance with OSHA and local health orders.

We have completed two amendments to the cannabis business license ordinance and have continued Spanish interpretation of all Board of Supervisors meetings and call-in options for public testimony. Goals and objectives for the coming fiscal year include moving beyond 22 and working with the board to develop better aligned strategic initiatives and performance measures Develop organizational criteria to promote compliance and accountability countywide. This will be done partly with the addition of the Countywide Compliance Officer.

Advance commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. Amend Chapter 50 again to address some unused cannabis cultivation acreage and cultivation area measurements, to ensure our county employees are educated on and trained on disaster service worker responsibilities. And finally, to develop and implement quarterly dashboards to track each department's risk control and prevention strategies, policies, and procedures. We're hoping this can help.

Potentially minimize our drastic increases in risk premiums over the past few fiscal years. Our new 22 goals and objectives, we've met the majority of them. We are trying to get 100% of our non-executive team through InnovateSBC either a green belt or a black belt. We're not quite there but our goal is to get there in the coming fiscal year. We have successfully retained 100% of our new employees that started with the county in that particular cohort, one of which as Mona mentioned came from another department and so we are benefiting from him staying within the county.

And we are continuing to develop our leaders by sending them through leadership development programs. As you can see, our performance measures reflect the focus on bilingual notifications both emergency and otherwise. And you can see it's a goal of ours to increase the county workforce trained in incident command structure and so we have that as a performance measure moving forward.

Our KPMG recommendations, we have a couple in progress Basically surrounding countywide strategic management and communication plans, and we have gone through and reviewed the ACEO responsibilities and realigned their activities to be more proactive and coordinated. We do have no service level reductions And as mentioned, the $100,000 expansion request is a waterfront infrastructure feasibility study through REACH. It's a one-time cost of $100,000. The goal of the study is to determine where and how waterfront and supporting infrastructure can be enhanced or created to enable offshore wind and commercial space on the Central Coast and position the region to capture jobs and economic benefits associated with them.

The study includes Sloan County and the City of Morro Bay, and both of those entities will be contributing to the study. In summary, the department will promote organizational and financial stability through long-term fiscal planning, continue COVID-19 recovery planning, plan implementation and coordination, prepare and plan for secession, and work to recruit, recruit retain and develop department leadership, advance diversity, equity inclusion and accessibility efforts throughout the organization.

And again, develop the steps beyond Renew22 and foster organizational growth through consistently modeling behaviors and values." We're going to end with the end in mind too with the quote that Mona brought up earlier.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8044:33

That is a great quote. Any questions from the board? Supervisor Lavinino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8844:41

It's not a question just You know, I think I can't let the time pass without just talking about what a great job CEO's office does Not just Mona Although she is our perfect CEO but that whole team There's folks there that including Jacqueline yes and I got a chance to meet Right No, what's Chase yesterday in the parking lot? So no I'm talking about the puppy.

The little one oh that's Chase okay all right get our dog straight here our mascot but when you look at the folks that are in that department that are in the CEO's office you know we always talk about retention and generally by the time somebody gets into that office they're kind of getting to the point where we might be losing them at the end of their career Thank God we have some younger individuals now in there.

But the level of work and the quality of work that comes out is second to none, and really puts us in a position to succeed. If we didn't have this support system and us in kind of a symbiotic relationship, you know, the taxpayer's going to go unserviced. Sometimes when I look out from the dais and I see some of our very senior CEO's office members, and I always think of Terry when I say this is a lookout. And I think if she leaves what's going to happen? You know and but I always know that there's another person my dad has always told me there's quote that he always lives by that cemeteries full of indispensable people you know and I know Couple years from now there'll be somebody else sitting in this seat and that seat and that's the CEO seat And somebody will take Terry's place, and it'll continue to happen But I'm very happy with the people that we're working with right

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8046:41

now Supervisor Williams

CommentTOT It'sProposed46:45

well, I'm hoping no one ever takes Terry's place but but but III know those are inevitable Inevitabilities to some extent, but you know I do think it's good to reflect on either for The staff that haven't worked in these kinds of other kinds of jurisdictions. I've had both the pleasure and misfortune of working in multiple jurisdictions, and some of them have City managers offices or CEO's offices that are very much at odds with multiple board members or vice versa.

We either because of ideological differences, personality differences, the inability to build a team among a board or a city council you know a harder time relying upon recommendations Information and I just think we are really fortunate to have an integrated board and CEO Team that really can rely on each other. And that is You know for those of you that are just used to that it's it's not actually the majority of jurisdictions out there That have that and it's special

0:48 – 0:5924 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8048:09

Supervisor Lavinia

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8848:10

Thank you, I forgot to mention and I think this is Nancy your first time taking over the budget or is this your second one?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed48:16

Second

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8848:16

time. Okay well I just want to say it's been a very very smooth transition and that could have ended up you know imploding and being a mess and I appreciate the fact that we really brought it all together and it's seamless.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8048:33

Supervisor Hart

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed48:35

Well, I've learned in my three plus years here that the county organization is very complex and the range of issues cover everything that people do or need in our county. And we are super fortunate to have a visionary leader like Mona and she is calm when things are not and a creative when she has a moment, and her quote I think summarizes her approach to her job really well because it isn't enough to have creative ideas and people with a lot of energy thinking of things we oughta be doing.

It requires somebody to actually take those visions and turn them into action, and the team that you've assembled that do that every day understand that and are really smart and know how to work hard And the secret sauce of this place is your leadership and the team that you've assembled, and us listening to you as well. Not just talking about what we need to do. We hear from our constituents, and we want to be responsive to that. We all have our own independent ideas about how we can improve the community in the county that we live in and care so deeply about. But you are the key point in all that, and I'm just really grateful to have had the opportunity

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8049:56

Supervisor Nielsen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:57

Yes, thank you Chair Harmon and I just wanted to kind of expand on something that was said by my colleagues here is the five of us have very different constituencies, very different life experiences and we come to this job together and we work really well together but we're not always on the same page You know, I think the success of the CEO's office is somebody like myself who is sometimes on the minority of that ideological band if you will never feels isolated.

Never feels that I'm not being listened to or that my constituents are not being served and I think that really is a big deal. It's not that Mona works for three people she works for all five of us and all 450,000 constituents we have and I think at the end of the day that's why we ride for the brand. That's why even though we may not always be in agreement We are all working together to move our county forward, and you guys do a great job I also want to compliment miss Anderson on her budget. I think last year when she did the budget She was just still new But I think that's also a testimony of the leadership of Jeff rap well who came in and you know so this is my 10th budget at the County and Jeff is an all-star, and I really want to thank Jeff for everything he's done to kind of set up not only the budgets that we have here this year but I mean, he's also trained and mentored other budget analysts.

And so I think getting Jeff and stealing Jeff has been a huge win for Santa Barbara County. And I think as we look forward to the future, we can see a lot of things come from that. And just wanted to appreciate you, Jeff. Thank

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8051:37

Well, I actually had a question. Could you go back to slide seven? And the Emergency Preparedness Outreach Coordinator, could you describe a little more what that person will do? I serve on the board of the Fire Safe Council and this is an area of great interest to me personally so I'm just eager to understand more about it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:04

That's a great question. I have Kelly Hoover our OEM director speak to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed52:08

that This position is really looking towards Both some of the new legislative mandates But also some of the things that we know we need to do in emergency preparedness and outreach to the community We know from recent studies that the standard messaging that feet from FEMA doesn't always work for all of our community members when you have A family or a single parent who's trying to put food on the table, it's hard to tell them to prepare for seven days of food. And so really looking at what is our emergency preparedness message? How do we engage our community in that?

Also helping to inform our community to be cultural brokers for us. me, the government saying this is how you can prepare. But let me go out and reach out to our churches and our community members teach them how to engage in the community on preparedness and education and help them become more resilient through their progress.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8053:03

So the way you describe it working a lot more with community based organizations and I hope the Fire Safe Council will be high on the list because they're also doing that work. Well, that's very exciting. I did have another question too about the Equity Outreach Coordinator and what that person will be doing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:23

Thank you Chair Hartman. So as part of our ARPA funding we have had an emphasis on diversity equity and inclusion To outreach to those members of our community have traditionally not been part of the fold, so to speak. So this is funded by ARPA and it's a coordinator to do better outreach countywide and also help coordinate among our departments. And so the focus is really on the Health and Human Services services. They all are doing their own work but it's to help coordinate within the county but also then reach out as a county wide sort of ambassador on these issues.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8053:54

And I just want to strongly endorse that because each department has been experimenting and we're learning a great deal. And there may not be a one size fits all, but if that's the case, we really want to have clear understanding why it's the case and not overburden certain organizations so I'm again really excited about this new position. The other thing I wanted just to talk about and get a sense is the reach ask. And CEO Miyasato, we had some public comment on Tuesday about that.

Do we know yet for sure how much the other jurisdictions are going to be contributing?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed54:43

Chair Hartman, so it's the total project is $250,000. Slope County is indicating the same allocation as County of Santa Barbara, so it's $100,000 from them and $50,000 from City of Moor Bay.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8054:59

So I'm not sure exactly what the right amount is, but in these REACH meetings that coordinate with the base and many others one of the points is that the Central Coast can be the mecca for renewable energy. But you can only do things, you can only really have action if you've got the infrastructure that's there to support it. And I realize that creating that infrastructure is going to create some conflicts with environmental concerns and others. But if that's what we want for our future, we need to invest and figure out how to invest in an intelligent way.

Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed55:44

Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. I just wanted to agree with you on that, you know, and taking it even one step further You know, we're looking through the arena process on where we're going to fit houses. We've got to solve this job housing imbalance and when I'm looking at our numbers and figuring okay you know these houses have to go somewhere. I know that inevitably some of them will be in the North County where we don't have the jobs support the housing market that we have and so for me this is This piece here is part of that because we need to make sure that we have those jobs. And I think when we're looking at the waterfront infrastructure, we are looking here in the South Coast but we're also looking at Denver Air Force Base and maybe it's also going to go into San Luis Obispo County where there's obviously a job market that moves back and forth between Slough County and Northern Santa Barbara County so this is an investment that you kind of wonder how many more studies are you gonna pay for before we actually start to get stuff?

But at the same time, it does seem like it's a good investment for our county to be engaged

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8056:43

Yeah, Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed56:45

Yeah I just want to add my support for this investment too because you know we're not going to see the immediate payoff of this but if we don't make this investment now and we don't put ourselves in a position to have the infrastructure necessary to make the transition to a renewable energy future, you know we're gonna find ourselves stuck and so these are good high-paying jobs that are really critical to the economic vitality of the region and doing this work collaboratively with the County of San Luis Obispo will put us in the best position to be a place where these industries want to come and have the infrastructure in place to make their businesses work. And we're all talking about it, it's important to follow up those words with actions.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8057:30

That was just the point I was gonna make. You can have the vision, but if you don't have the infrastructure it's not gonna happen. So I also just wanted to say with regard to your quote and your team in the CEO's office, I think at this point in our lives our job is to have vision but nothing happens without having people who can work together to make things really Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you. The fact that we get along well owes a lot to you and your office who are always, I mean this is always a balance, a delicate balance back and forth. We've got great ideas some of them aren't legal. We've got great ideas some you can't afford. And so it has to be this back-and-forth to figure out You know, what is a path that might work? And so that's what I so appreciate and that's what makes this job so much fun. That's why everybody ought to want to work for our county.

Okay with that going to public comment Madam Clerk.

not transcribed≈42s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role59:16

Chair Hartman and members of the board we have no request to speak on the policy and executive functional group

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8059:22

Okay, that takes us to the item we couldn't get to on Tuesday maintenance and capital projects and Chair Hartman.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed59:35

Yes. We actually have one more the current the general county programs. Oh,

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8059:38

yes I that sorry about that one. We sort of It's not the most exciting General County Programs Thanks for the reminder.

0:59 – 1:077 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed59:55

Chair Hartman and members of the board, this presentation is for the General County Programs and includes support to other governments and organizations, general fund reserve and committed fund balances and ancillary services. The purpose of the General County Programs is to account for countywide type activity that is not typically associated to one specific department. These are primarily support to other agencies such as LAFCO, our debt service payments and other board commitments in general administration and consultant reviews including KPMG.

General County Programs also contain the key discretionary fund balance components for the general fund. Appropriations for this program requested in 22-23 is $3.17 million. This amount includes $1.4 million in debt service payments and funding for the KPMG reviews, InnovateSBC, LAFCO, and other operating program costs. These costs are offset by approximately $2.8 million in general fund contribution. The remaining costs are funded by an IRS subsidy in general fund reserved or committed fund balances.

The funding from these programs, this chart actually shows the budget unit is funded primarily by general fund contribution that remains relatively flat and a minor operating source of the federal subsidy. The funding from these programs accomplished several key objectives in the current fiscal year. The northern branch jail operation was funded in accordance with the plan. 18% maintenance funding was allocated, KPMG reviews for three departments were completed. Several trainings were held to promote and innovate SBC and funding related to key board priorities was identified and managed through prudent policies.

For next fiscal year, the objectives remain very similar. Northern branch jail operations are accounted for. The 18% maintenance funding of $11.6 million has been allocated. KPMG reviews for clerk recorder assessor, community services, public health, public works and auditor controller are in process or planned. Innovate SBC training continues with a goal of 30 employees for the black belt training and total 250 for the green belt.

Training and we will continue to manage funding board priorities critical capital capital and technology projects There are no service level reductions related to this budget unit I In summary, we'll continue to manage these countywide programs and provide assistance to all departments. And we will ensure that the County's ongoing Renew 22 and countywide big picture goals are being supported in funding will be managed consistent with the board priorities and county policy.

This last slide shows the general fund key discretionary fund balance accounts. It does not encompass all of the fund balances maintained within the department budgets. Most of these accounts are associated with a board approved policy and are committed to specific purposes. Some of the accounts are used to account for transfers from general fund contribution and Pass through to other departments such as the 18% deferred maintenance, roads baseline, facilities baseline, hazardous tree mitigation and jail operations.

For the cannabis funds specifically all of the actual tax collections and allocations are accounted for through this one count. As indicated in Monday's overview the estimated unadjusted balance at June 30th 2022 for these key general fund balances is $142.4 million dollars Adjusted balances for allocation and earmarks is fifty eight point two million dollars of which forty point six million is related to the strategic reserve That equates to 8% of the general fund operating revenue some notable changes mentioned throughout our board letter and previous presentations To policy or fiscal planning as part of the preliminary budget, our $1.7 million was added to the strategic reserve in accordance with policy.

2.2 million was added to the NBJ operational plan in accordance with policy. $2.25 million was added to the technology replacement related to the ERP in accordance with policy. 1.25 million was added to the labor costs set aside and program stabilization. And as a reminder, we are also proposing a new policy related to the Disaster Recovery Reserve to maintain a minimum reserve of $3 million in the discovery.

Disaster recovery fund balance in general county programs to fund the repair of County infrastructure damaged during disasters when no other state or federal reimbursement or other available funding can be identified There are sufficient funds in the account to meet this requirement The primary intent and the policy is to help define what the purpose of the remaining ballots could be used for That concludes my comments on on this budget unit chair Hartman. I'm happy to answer any questions you may have

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:05:05

And do we have any questions? Well, actually I have a couple. This is far more interesting part of the budget than one might think from the name. I mean, I think here what we have is all the internal efforts to create an innovative culture here. We started with Renew 2022. We went KPMG, The Leadership Academy, Innovate SBC. Those are all ways Again, you can have the vision but unless you operationalize it and this is how we operationalize an innovative forward-looking culture. And so it is very, very significant.

I just wanted to add that the emergency funding for things that aren't covered That happened with Rufufio Road and Alice all And and so I very much experienced how important this is and very much support doing that. I think it's part of being resilient going forward Supervisor Lovenino,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:06:11

thank you. I'm just wondering if this is the place Where we might discuss? An item that both supervisor Hartman and myself were Wanted to discuss regarding North County. Use safety that would kind of match what's happening in the South County is more of a function of instead of a yearly ask in the budget, that it would become a general fund budgeted allocation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:42

Supervisors yeah, you can provide us any direction and we do the wrap-up. You confront direction to us there But yes So if just to remind the board so some years ago before I joined the county There was a an annual amount going to the south coast it was then called the South Coast gang task force I think it's a South Coast Youth Safety Task Force And that got into the budget in 990 and so it's a contract we have with communify It used to be CAC for an annual amount for that.

Then, as you said a few years ago your board at Supervisor Lavinia's suggestion allocated funds, insistence, suggestion.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:07:22

All right it was

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:22

insistence. Insistence asked for a set aside one time set aside for North County similar so if your board would like to do that we can talk about that and we can add it to the list but I think if you want to give us direction you can today

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:07:38

Yeah, I think that the direction at least would be for me for you to review. To at least put it up as something that we could discuss as we get into deliberations so we can talk about how we're going to address that issue.

1:07 – 1:156 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:07:53

Perfect and thank you for raising that. So, Madam Clerk is there any public comment on either general county programs or the whole functional group? Chair Hartman

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:08:04

and members of the board we do not have any requests to speak on either of those.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:08:09

Thank you so moving to our second special issue maintenance and capital projects Mr. Clemente

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:08:25

Good morning again, Chair Hartman and the board. So I'll be presenting the first of our special issues on maintenance and capital projects. I'll discuss maintenance funding on the next few slides and then I'll hand it off to each of the departments to discuss some completed maintenance projects this year as well as those scheduled for next year. Then it will return to me to give brief descriptions of the unfunded capital projects being recommended for further funding consideration.

This first slide is one we've been showing for a few years now. It compares projections made in 2014 for how much maintenance funding the 18% policy would produce over time, in the dark gray bars on the left with the actual amount accumulated since adoption and the dark blue bars on the right. On top of those blue bars, we've stacked one-time funding in each year that was allocated towards maintenance projects as well as additional revenue sources going towards deferred maintenance that didn't exist at the time the 2014 plan was adopted.

In most years this means SB1 revenue and public works as well as ARPA funding in 21-22 that your board also allocated to Public Works. The red line going across the top was the annual amount deemed necessary back in 2014 to start making a dent in the backlog. We can see that while the 18% funding hasn't been growing as quickly as projected, the additional revenues and occasional bumps in one-time funding have put us over the line three of the past five years you see here.

One note of clarification to make is that on a later slide, Public Works will be talking about maintenance funding they have put specifically into pavement which includes all of their 18% funds and the majority but not all of the 9.1 million SB-1 funds that you see in the 2223 column here. The amount not going into pavement is going towards other deferred maintenance and transportation such as hardscape trees bridges culverts and traffic signals and thus is reflected on this total funding chart This table is a further breakdown of the 22-23 preliminary numbers on the prior chart by department and funding source.

You can see the 18% dollars are still being split, 50%, 35, 15 between Public Works, General Services and CSD Parks. We see SB1 in Public Works as well as $600,000 for a Highway Safety Improvement Grant and $2 million in grants and parks for work at Kachuma and Halama. The Deferred Maintenance Backlog is updated annually by departments, and we see numbers very similar to last year's indicating that we're seeing a flattening in the growth of the backlog with the additional funding going towards maintenance. And we'll continue to track these numbers annually.

Now I'll hand it over to CSD.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:11:24

Thank you, Paul. Good morning supervisors nice to see you again just wanted to do a quick very quick update on the deferred maintenance and preventive maintenance projects that have been funded but I don't have a clicker so who's my thank you what you'll see in the next two slides really with the five hundred thousand baseline maintenance and 1.53 18 percent allocation are just projects that we were able to anticipate being able to complete this year We strive to make it equitable monetarily throughout all districts though sometimes adjustments do need to be made for emergency or safety items and most importantly especially this year of grant matches which have been provided quite a I Think we had about five or six million going through our department this year in grants, which is great Here's just our one photo for you for deferred and preventive maintenance.

This is what the before-and-after was anticipated to look like we anticipated getting being able to get started on those restrooms within the next couple of months For next year, we really just have again some countywide Evenly distributed as much as possible projects and they really focus on paving water efficiencies and playground replacements Now it's Patrick's turn.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:12:51

Thank you, good morning Chair Hartman and board members we appreciate the opportunity to present these issues to you today before we go through our slides I just wanted to express a brief thank you to your board for your engagement on these issues this is always a tough set of issues for the county And I also want to thank our dedicated facility maintenance staff. We have an incredible group led by Scott Hosking, our facilities manager. They respond to 10,000 work orders per year and they do it without complaint and real care. I'm pleased and thrilled to be able to work with them on a daily basis. They've done remarkable work They've responded to emergencies, supported our COVID-19 responses and completed their day-to-day maintenance activities on our roughly 390 facilities.

Much of the information regarding our deferred maintenance that we present today was assembled by our Facilities Maintenance Team and their projects have been completed under their capable leadership. This first set of images captures only a small portion of the emergencies that we face across our county building inventory throughout this past year. In fiscal year 21-22, we've completed a wide range of emergency related and deferred maintenance projects including water main breaks, storm and sanitary sewer breaks HVAC system failures tiles falling off of buildings to supporting the pallet house projects in both Isla Vista and Lompoc.

Our facility maintenance and capital projects team take on various countywide programs that have been established throughout this annual CIP program. In fiscal year 21-22, we have and are managing a wide range of projects that range from roof replacements, flooring replacements, painting accessibility projects work on our jails and justice facilities. And obviously we're responding to roughly $1.5 million annually on just emergency projects alone.

In fiscal year 22-23, we intend to structure our program similar to what we've seen in past years. We're going to continue to deliver that high quality facility maintenance and project management services that we've all become accustomed to and move forward with. As you're aware, we've gone to a more programmatic approach where we're doing Maintenance projects, deferred maintenance projects on painting, flooring, electrical systems, security systems, parking lot repairs, roof repairs, energy efficiency repairs across the county. We're going to continue on with that approach has been very successful for us the last couple of years. We anticipate this upcoming year doing $6.9 million worth of work.

1:15 – 1:221 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:15:48

Good morning. Chris Nutton, Public Works Transportation. As Paul mentioned the county has a $305 million backlog in transportation infrastructure needs. We track them in five asset classes so pavement, hardscape and urban forests or trees, bridges, drainage systems and traffic control devices. This is just this backlog is just addressing existing infrastructure fix it first type stuff. It's not including any kind of capital improvement projects or things like that.

For the 21-22 roadmap, I'm not going to read all these roads unless you want me to but this is just kind of illustrative of the list of roads we have that we're doing thanks to your board's ARPA commitment. We were able to reestablish the full road map process this year so we're happy about It represents 11.1 million dollars and about 7.4 is going to rehabilitation and 3.7 is going to preservation so this kind of illustrates the difference of why we are always trying to get roads into pavement preservation mode because for about half of the cost you're doing even more roads than you're able to do with rehabilitation The other thing I wanted to note here is this represents 50, a little over 50 lane miles of road. The other 1600 lane miles of road are taken care of by our in-house maintenance forces so that translates to about 45 lane miles per maintenance worker that we have Also as part of the road maintenance annual plan, we do hardscape work in preparation for these pavement treatments.

So upgrading the ADA compliance of our sidewalk network and improving drainage and things like that goes along with it as well. This list if you read all these roads, you would see it's a little bit longer list than the one that was just shown for the rehabilitation again. Just to put it in perspective, this is the preventive maintenance lists that we're doing and it's about $20,000 to $100,000 a lane mile to do preventive work. It's about $250,000-$300,000 dollars a lane mile to do rehabilitation work so that's why again why we're really trying to get into this mode as much as possible These are some of the projects that we're working on and we're really working on trying to stretch our dollars through the efficiencies, getting into preservation mode but also partnerships and leveraging our funding with grants where we can.

That's really challenging to do for maintenance work These projects are examples of that. So through your board's dedication of the Edison funding, we're able to add $10 million of road work in the Montecito and Carpinteria area. And that's what's on the upper left is Romero Canyon. That's the last road in that series of paving that we're doing. So that restores all these roads to a good condition but it also in the future makes them less expensive to maintain so you get two benefits from doing On the right is our upper right is our in-house paving crew so we can do leveling courses kind of an intermediate paving with our pavement crews. So, in addition to the big contract roadmap working work that we're doing, our paving crews are working some leveling work into their work plan as well.

So again, it's getting more efficiencies there. In the lower left is the Obern Trail Rehabilitation. We were able to leverage CSA3 funding and some Measure A funding to get grants for a paving, which is really rare but we were able to do it in this case and replace 55 of the lights along the path. And then the lower right is an example of the types of hardscape projects that we're doing in preparation for the roadmap work.

Another thing where we're leveraging is doing partnerships in our hardscape work, so we actually have a in-house concrete crew that does really good concrete work and we work with homeowners who want to get work done in front of their house where they pay half of the cost and we pay half of the cost So we're able to leverage our money and get more hardscape work done that way.

The upper left here is another partnership, this is with the Bucket Brigade. We've been working with them in Montecito and now we're starting to work other places in the county so when a county comes in and does kind of the hard infrastructure work, hard meaning asphalt and concrete and stuff like that, and then the Bucket Brigade has come in and put in pedestrian facilities they've been able to build Two miles of trails through Montecito for a fraction of the cost of what we would have had to spend to do it. So that's been a really effective partnership and we're working on doing that more.

The two paving projects here show sort of the difference between preventive versus rehab in terms of all that goes into them. A preventative treatment is a really thin layer, it's a surface treatment there's not a lot of preparation work goes on the existing surface takes a day or two Whereas the rehab, you're grinding out the failures. You're repaving with a thicker section and there's a lot of preparation work so you can kind of see the level of effort that goes into those two types of work.

And then the lower right is the last project in a partnership with UCSB that Terry Nisich worked on getting this partnership put together, and in addition to other people where UCSB put in $2 million and the county put in $ 2 million. And over the last 5 or 10 years we've been able to infill a lot of Isla Vista that way, the pedestrian infrastructure. In 22-23, again thanks to your board's commitment to deferred maintenance and the general fund allocation we're holding pretty steady with our payment funding. We're at $11.3 million this year and you'll see a similar type of work. You can see the complexion of our rehab to preservation is about as pretty similar as well so we're looking forward to another year of getting a lot of work done out there For the maintenance funding request, the way that we calculate that is we look at the backlog.

Again, we're looking at pavement only. We have about $144 million worth of need. It's not really practical to do that as a one big chunk thing so we spread it over 10 years. That translates to $14.4 million per year. We're putting 11.3 in, subtract those two numbers and we get 3.1 million. And so that's how we arrive at that. Thank you.

1:22 – 1:317 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:22:44

So that's Mr. Clemente, is that the end?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:22:50

Almost. I'll walk through a couple slides here so that was the maintenance portion now we'll walk through a couple of these slides on some unfunded CIP projects for further consideration Your board hasn't seen the CIP yet. I believe it's planned to go on May 17th at the moment, but as you're aware there is always included in there a large amount of unfunded projects that are identified by departments.

We have all those projects listed in appendix slides to this presentation at the back. We won't be walking through those slides, but we've summarized just to kind of picture the amount here on this table. It's over $680 million dollars in unfunded projects from the CIP. Countywide. This slide contains a few of those unfunded projects from the larger lists that are being recommended for further funding consideration, although even here you will note that the amount of funding necessary to complete all the projects just on this slide is more than the total one-time funding available that Ms. Anderson discussed at the beginning of these workshops.

I will briefly describe each project here, and the departments are available if more detail is needed. And your board can take this information into consideration within the context of all expansion requests during your deliberations. The Santa Maria Public Defender Office reconfiguration will reconfigure the space including creating a new entrance, replacement of water lines, flooring and new ceilings for $400,000.

Santa Barbara courthouse exterior lighting upgrades would replace the exterior building lighting with new energy efficient LED lights for 300,000 The North County communications shop retrofit would reconfigure the existing shop space to accommodate system improvements created through the public safety radio project including electrical system upgrades HVAC improvements and energy-efficient lighting for 250,000 The New Quiama Sheriff's Substation Reconfiguration would convert the existing sheriff's substation into residential living quarters to support officers stationed at the remote New Quiama duty post, $150,000.

The ADA Restroom Upgrade at Rincon Beach Park would cost $750,000 Better Avia Campus Weatherization and Window Replacement Project would correct water intrusion and climate control issues for $525,000 Doing just the projects mentioned above would cost a total of $2.4 million, which is within range of the available one time funding to allocate this year. However, the table below also lists projects representative of other board and department priorities.

Clark at Norris Roundabout would improve traffic circulation, pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and safety in Orkut. Funding this year would allow plan design and cost estimates and position the project for future funding opportunity. That's $300,000. The Orcutt Library building acquisition is a general fund match needed to combine with community funding and AB 1600 funds to purchase an existing building for use as the future site of the Orcut library.

Acquiring a building would be a first step toward accessing state grants available for rehabilitating and converting the building into a library. Request match amount is 2.25 million. Santa Barbara Courthouse roof replacement phase two would do work on the Figueroa Street side of the facility for 2.95 million Phase one of the roof replacement project and Anacapa and Figueroa corner will begin in early summer Modoc multi-use path phase two would continue the separated multi-use Trail to the Oburn trail. This was discussed by Public Works on Tuesday Phase one from the city limits to viacinda will be constructed this summer And once that's it phase 2 is complete you'd have a complete Alternate mode network from Isla Vista to the City of Santa Barbara.

This is a million dollar Request which would provide local match to draw down a larger state grant on the project Refugio Road Paths Phase 2 design will continue work on pedestrian and informal path network identified in the San Dines Community Plan. Phase 2 design work would prepare plans and cost estimates, and position the project for future construction funding. That's $400,000.

And the Mission Canyon Curve Safety Improvements was identified in the county's Collision Reduction Program to improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians. It would reprofile and widen the road to improve curve safety, and upgrade the pedestrian crossing near the intersection of Puesta del Sol and Mission Canyon. That's 450,000. The projects on this second table total 7.4 million.

And then this new slide was added per Supervisor Williams' request on Monday. These are other unfunded HVAC projects throughout county facilities, their costs and estimated payback period. You'll see about $1.7 million, $2 million was a number discussed on Monday. Those projects, there was a project on that older list that was at the S.B. Vets Hall which is part of now the larger federal grant that's been received to rehabilitate that building which would include the HVAC project there so that has come off this list.

So the total here is about 1.7 million. There's a variety of projects. So this just summarizes what we've just walked through. Total unfunded projects of 680.7 million, the projects for further funding consideration were 2.4 million as well as another 7.4 in other board and department priority projects and then the additional 1.7 million in HVAC projects on the prior slide.

And as a reminder the available one-time funding for all department requests was 4.1 million to 6.1 million pending some ARPA considerations I believe Nancy will be walking through in her special issue

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:29:11

Supervisor Williams

CommentTOT It'sProposed1:29:13

Well, I just also wanted to see how that that compared though say for instance the courthouse lighting project I mean is that energy savings enough to have a payback period? You know it's You know not that we are in the position that we were last year of having Enough to fund a bunch of these. We probably can't this year was supposed to be one of those years and fortune turned against us And so obviously with four million dollars between all needs, we're not gonna fund all of these but can does anybody have a rough sense of that courthouse payback period I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:29:52

Yeah, Supervisor Williams to the chair. You know the lighting projects are variable it just depends on the volume and the types of units that ultimately get installed we would expect that it would be similar to this a 12-15 year payback time frame but it's going to depend on the depth of the scope and the overall equipment that we ultimately utilize

CommentTOT It'sProposed1:30:20

And why so bad for a lighting project? I mean most lighting projects, even the ones that you send us have like a five to seven year payback period. Sometimes less considering the LED technology has gotten so good and now you're starting Yeah, laser diodes and all sorts of cool stuff that use even less energy for the amount of lumens I think in this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:30:47

particular case with this facility. We're talking about 50 plus years of infrastructure In this case we're gonna have to replace a lot of conduits A lot of other issues that we wouldn't necessarily see at other facilities it is a 90-plus year old Complex and I'm sure the lighting is if I'm not mistaken is at least 50 years in many many of the circumstances so it's just a little tougher project on an older building and We'll try to be efficient. But those are some of the factors that a little bit about out of our control at this point

1:31 – 1:4622 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:31:22

Any other questions Madam Clerk, is there any public comment for this special issue focus?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:31:35

Chair Hartman and members of the board. We have no request to speak on the special issue regarding maintenance and capital

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:31:40

projects. Chairman, thank you. I neglected to make some comments there. Sure. I just wanted to congratulate this board and past boards on the commitment to funding capital and maintenance. You know, we're seeing that flattening the backlog. This has been something that my office has been navigating for some time and it's taken not only the commitment back in 2014 for 18% funding but it's taken each board after that to continue to invest in that. Maintenance isn't always sexy. There is no ripping cutting when you pave a road so it's hard decisions this board has to make and I just wanted to congratulate The collective brand as we've moved forward with that, and I think it's moving in the right direction. And I think there's a lot of pride in that.

I talk to different workers whether it's public works or general services that used to run around with a bunch of Band-Aids trying to solve problems. And at this point now we're actually doing real maintenance. And instead of waiting for buildings to crumble and then rebuild them and go through financing that way, we're actually going to be able to maintain the assets that are really the assets that belong to our taxpayers. And so I think in the end, that's a great investment as we've seen with the pavement condition index, you know, as it begins to rise, the actual cost to maintain starts to lower. And so I just want to encourage us all to continue to make those commitments because I think just like we've made a commitment to pay down the pension debt You know, in the future we're hopefully going to see some benefits from that.

Just as if we can continue to maintain the infrastructure that we have I think in the end we're going to be much better for it as a county.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:33:29

Supervisor Lavanino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:33:30

Thank you. And I'm curious about maybe I missed this but on the unfunded renewable energy projects and I know Supervisor Williams talked on one or two of them. It would be nice to have another column that shows project costs and then payoff So that we can kind of look at that and then I was curious if that is something that we've looked at. As taking on debt, is it? Is that on those projects? Is that anything that we've looked at?

Those seem like they would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:06

have Mr. Frappel respond

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:34:08

like projects that pay for themselves.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:34:16

Supervisor Lavergne, through the Chair. It's a really good question and it relates to energy efficiency projects where you can expect to see return on investment. The financing options are varied, and we look at each one. So there are options opportunities with state funding, CEC funding as well as on-bill financing funding. All those kind of mechanisms are looked at and evaluated to see which is the most appropriate mix of financing for a particular project. And so could we issue a COP for all that? Not likely. They wouldn't likely all qualify.

So, it's really kind of taking each one of those projects and figuring what is the right financing strategy. And so we can do that if your board would like us to kind of take those top ones and figure out what is a financing strategy or where the options? We'd be happy to do that.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:35:18

I'm sorry. So then the other question I have on that is maybe this is for Supervisor Williams since he's our rep, but so how is the CCE? You know part of the sales pitch was that we were going to get money to do these types of projects. So how is that going and kind of if you could give just a quick.

CommentTOT It'sProposed1:35:38

Well there's a couple different things number one is that you know I'm going to go ahead and get started. The economies of scale would be so awesome that without some of it going to the jail itself, it would be good. But because the jail itself is gonna cost us a lot of money each month, we'd wanna pay for that energy and sell excess. So that's one of the possibilities I don't think... I think when 3CE came here they made the commitment that if we can get it within You know, a couple cents per kilowatt hour of market rate that they would actually prefer having more the resiliency of more small local projects.

But that doesn't mean that we that they buy it at any at any rate right? And then the other issue that is relevant to this from 3CE is that if we can't, if we don't have the money for our own batteries right then 3CE every six months is going out for 50 megawatts of one-to-five megawatt batteries where they have an agreement We host the battery. We get to use it for emergencies.

They discharge it every day for load shaving, to reduce the amount of expensive and dirty energy that's used off of the grid. So some of these would be good candidates for that. Now, it means we can't use it whenever we want to. We use it for emergencies but it still provides a function and a benefit for our constituencies Since he since he gave me some platform time. I just want to say, I think it's great that you're bringing it up because projects on the other list especially the HVAC list some only some of these would have a 15 year or less payback period but but a ton of our HVAC ones do right and Willingness to use debt or other things is a very rational thing if we have a 12 to 15 year payback period on the HVAC stuff. In fact, we're losing money by not replacing them and a bunch of them are in the public safety budget which is our hardest to address so I mean we'd be arguably making it more sustainable over time.

I hope we could explore that because obviously, we don't have enough money to meet all these projects. But issuing some kind of debt and mixing it with other financing options to address some of the ones that have real good payback periods, I think is a good sense both from an environment and a financial perspective.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:38:54

Supervisor Lavenino?

CommentTOT It'sProposed1:38:55

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:38:56

And I don't want to get all the way into the 3CE discussion now but I thought part of it was though that there were rebates coming back to the individual counties that signed up so that we could do these projects. So am I mistaken or is that still just something in the works? Or they have to qualify, or how does that work?

CommentTOT It'sProposed1:39:15

So there's a couple different programs. There's the battery one that I just talked about. There's resiliency, battery or emergency backup program that is possible to apply for. There is the money for chargers which would help offset the request from general services and there's the vehicle ones. In fact I had a conversation with Skip afterwards about the EVs The mixture of the 3CE incentive plus the other incentives are now basically to the point where the difference between the light-duty electrics and the sedan electrics, between that and a fuel car would be almost nothing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:40:11

Supervisors, I'm also on the Operations Board as Supervisor Williams is on the Policy Board. There is money available for some programs but as we said, as Supervisor Williams said it's not to this scale but there are monies for the member agencies to apply for those types of programs you mentioned.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:40:29

Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:40:30

Yeah, I just had a couple questions for Mr. Sneddon when you're showing us the amount of work that's being done by the in-house crews versus the contract contractors Where do you draw the line on the scale of those projects? And how do you decide you know which? Which projects are eligible for the different strategies and then I guess my real question is is there Utility and expanding the in-house crews to do more work at a lower rate

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:40:58

Supervisor Hart to the chair. That's a good question that the there's we look at efficiencies and also flexibility so when you do a big contract, it's an efficient way to get work done and we don't pay if the thick heavy rehabilitation work type that type of work. It makes sense to package that and put into contracts and have contractors do it who do that stuff all What our in-house crew is really effective at is nimbly doing smaller kind of leveling. It's a very thin layer of maintenance paving and, you know, say a cul de sac or roads that are like a less traveled road but that has a lot of lane miles to it so we can take a thin treatment and cover a lot of distance. And then we also have flexibility in scheduling The limitation on how much they can do there are some limitations through state legislation and public contract code and things like that.

We have to be a little careful we couldn't for instance, do all although our crews have the ability to do the work. We couldn't just put all the paving works on them just through some of the rules that are in place for Those are the kind of push and pull that sets the cap of what we do in-house. It's sort of the limitations, which is roughly like a 30% of your work limitation. And then just efficiency, what's the most efficient way to get the work done?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:42:32

I know prices have been going up significantly in the contracting work, and is there a point where we can be more competitive in that space on those contracts? I know that as municipalities have gotten out of that work, there's less competition from the private side. Because there is not a public counterpoint in the bidding process. Is there a point where you can invest in the equipment and be competitive on the edge or at least push the prices down by being another choice for when contractors are looking at the work?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:43:05

Yeah, Supervisor Hart through the chair. That's another thing we look at and actually it's in these times when having that in-house capability is really really valuable because it can be very competitive. It gives you that buffer when you have inflation and you have supply chain issues and you have materials costs increasing and you have a very tight labor market And a very competitive contracting market all those things we can see 2030% increases in contract costs. Our costs are, you know we still experience the supply costs and materials cost but we do become relatively very efficient at getting this work done.

And that's kind of again the balance we have. We want enough of the right equipment and the right materials to be able to do the work efficiently, but at some point some of this work where you're grinding out long roads like Hollister in the middle of a lot of traffic and stuff, we're always going to have the need for contractors to do that kind of work. The concrete work that I was showing earlier is a good example of that. Our in-house concrete crew is extremely cost competitive right now in this market, and they're also nimble because we can do little pieces here and little pieces there working with the other work that they're doing so it's all about finding that and then you know their plates are pretty full so it's hard to add more to their plate just doing our the work plans that they're doing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:44:36

Well, thank you for that additional clarification. And then maybe a question for general services when you have this huge long list of super high priorities and their priorities are different in their color and shape and size how do you decide which things get the first work? Do you have roofs that you're not able to get to, that you should be able to? You should get to because if you don't get to them they're going to cause more damage. Or do you feel like you're at the stage where we're making...

And roofs are a great example. Are we getting all the roofs before they're causing water damage that costs more or are we still at a place where our roof's gonna fail and we're gonna have water damage because we don't have enough resources?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:45:18

Yeah, Supervisor Hart through the Chair. We actually use a variety of data points. We do have a deferred maintenance list that kind of grades out where we're at with all of our assets. We've created an asset management program through our Maintenance Connection System which is our work order system so we can pretty much tell you which roofs need to be replaced at which times and which ones are going to lead to larger problems if we don't get to them.

When we do get a set of projects as well we have a very well-defined We do a priority criteria analysis that we do to select projects for the capital program. And that uses a series of different category rankings and scoring that gives us an opportunity to say this is the higher priority. Some of those are legal mandates, energy efficiency, aesthetic benefits, functional benefits. So we do go through and rank every project And try to create a prioritized list on the year-over-year basis. That's done on our larger set of lists, as well as our individual program lists like roofs, parking lots, security projects and so forth. So we have sort of two processes that we go through to try to get to the best set of lists.

1:46 – 1:5111 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:46:32

Try this a little different way then. You know, Mr. Senn has a list that shows us that if we don't spend the three plus million dollars on pavement maintenance you know the PCI is going to go down. Is there a number that's similar in this space that we're talking about with roofs? Are we at the point where all the roofs are being taken care of before they cause damage or is there a deficit like in the PCI where we need to backlog it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:46:58

Yeah, there is a measurement device out there called the Facility Condition Index and that takes a lot of time and a lot of effort to implement. That's a system that is in place in very few governmental agencies but it is out there. We don't have the luxury of having that just because it takes years to establish and there's a significant cost to creating that So I don't have the delta on a regular basis. We have so many needs that we just get to the absolute worst as fast as we possibly can, since we have 400 plus roofs across all of our facilities. We pretty much know on a day-to-day basis which ones are the worst, which ones if we don't take care of them are gonna create additional issues. So we're constantly monitoring that. Our crews on our facility's maintenance side touch every facility Pretty much every week, depending on what needs to be done.

So we're in a constant monitoring mode and I think we can get to the worst ones as quickly as possible. What you see on our lists are absolutely the ones that we feel need to be addressed as fast as possible.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:48:09

So you have a lot of eyes, a lot of hands touching it. You know that you've got more work than you have the resources to do but you don't have the sophisticated systems that would be ideal to help you monitor that. But the bottom line answer the question of do we have roofs that were not able to take care of that deteriorate and cause leaks now?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:48:28

The answer to that is yes. We have hundreds of roofs and we cannot get to every single one of them each year. That's thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:36

you. CEO Miss Otto. Just for the board's information, so before I got here right before I got her eight years ago and nine years ago the former CEO did a whole evaluation deferred maintenance and we did come up with the facility condition index right as well as PCI that's when this conversation occurred and that's what Supervisor Nelson is speaking about So we did an exhaustive study, and it is exhaustive because you have to look at every particular building. And you have to look at all the deferred maintenance and keep track of it. And so what we have as a system now to look at what needs to be repaired but we did do that in the result of that was the chart that we had the number going up. It was because we said okay what's the minimum we need really?

And it was a minimum to maintain some level of consistency to address the PCI and the FCI. And that's why you have that number going up, and that was sort of a funding basis to help us as a measure. But as Patrick just talked about we're not, maybe not as just putting Band-Aids over everything but we're close.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:49:52

The total commitments to the maintenance, 18% maintenance policy funding. Is that the chart that you were talking about? Slide two?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:59

That was part of the contributing factor was 18%, but some of the numbers we got were because we looked at the FCI and the PCI.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:05

Thanks.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:50:08

Supervisor Nelson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:09

yeah, I just wanted to piggyback on that so it was actually called the Jorgensen report And so that was kind of baseline. That was it was done in 2014 So if you want to get an alleged star and I think that you know many of our workers knew Already a lot of these things but at comprehensive report, and I don't think it ever been done for Community services or parks department at that time so they added to the list that we have and I think that's what we've been building on over last eight years and so It's a great question, and eventually hopefully if we do get to a place of maintained then it would be a lot easier to have one of those FCI on a regular basis. And so I think that's ultimately the goal.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:50:52

Seeing no other lights up here. Oh Supervisor Williams did you? No. Okay Madam Clerk any public comment on this item?

1:51 – 2:102 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:51:01

Members of the board we have no request to speak on the maintenance and capital project special issue.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.801:51:05

Okay well let's take a 10-minute break and come back for digital transformation We're reconvening the April 14th Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting and we're on budget workshops and about to turn to the digital transformation update. Mr. Propwell?

2:10 – 2:214 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:10:38

Thank you, and good morning Madam Chair, members of the board. This morning before proceedings started I thought it was going to be unique in starting our presentation with my quote But I have been

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:10:51

one-upped

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:10:52

by my boss, which I'm going to conclude one of two things. Either great minds think alike or find the smartest person in the room and emulate them. So either way works but let me start with my quote this morning which really is you don't rise to the level of your goals. You fall to levels of your systems. And that was pinned by James Clear in his book Atomic Habits Now in making that statement, it really was to encourage us individually to put in place and to be committed to habits and practices necessary to obtain our goals, our personal objectives.

But I think it's equally as appropriate as we look at the county as an organization. Our policies, our practices, our technology systems if not continuously evaluated and renewed can hold us back from achieving our mission and our goals. So as we focus on digital transformation, sorry, as you focus on digital transformation of the county's technology infrastructure, our driving objective is not to simply have the latest greatest technology platforms or systems But rather to invest in the right solutions, to enable us to deliver county services in a more responsive and cost-effective manner for the benefit of all of our residences.

I would say our objective is really threefold in this realm. It's really to improve the rate at which we work and to do so in a more integrated and seamless manner. Secondly, to ensure that we appropriately safeguard our data and electronic information And finally, to enable departments to access and analyze data. To drive operational decisions and improve the quality of services that we provide every day.

With that as kind of background today, I'm joined here by Kyle Slattery our Chief Deputy Controller from the Autocontrollers Office and Andrew Montessori our Assistant Director for General Services over ICT. And we will provide us collectively they will provide collectively an update on several key technology related initiatives currently underway with that Kyle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:13:13

All right, good morning Chair Hartman, members of the board. Pleasure to be here to provide an update on the ERP project. Really key here to emphasize that this truly is a county-wide initiative. All county departments will use the ERP system and all and every county employee will be impacted and ideally in a very positive way. So some relevant background on the ERP system. An ERP system is a software platform, it unifies finance payroll and human resources applications into one fully integrated system. Currently the county uses 99 separate and distinct software applications to perform these features and functions.

So the ERP system will be used by the county to consistently perform our business processes, securely record and store our employee and financial information, and accurately report that information to those who need it. This is a large undertaking and the initial implementation of an ERP system will take two to three years but there are tremendous benefits. First and foremost it will allow the county to truly standardize and automate our business processes This is important because this will allow departments to not focus so much on the administrative aspects of their operations, but really on delivering exceptional services to the public consistent with their missions. It'll also allow us to dramatically simplify our technology landscape.

Of those 99 applications we're currently using, we'll be able to eliminate 48 of them. So nearly half of the applications currently in use will no longer need to be maintained, supported and separately held here. It will also allow the county to meet the expectations of our workforce. Many of us are used to using really robust software in our personal lives, and we do not wish to use antiquated software at our work. So this will really allow a modern software platform that will be consistent with the expectations of our workforce. And then ultimately, it will allow the county to transform our business operations to optimize our resources. This is really one of the key vehicles towards realizing those goals of Renew22 and beyond. So implementation is on track to begin at the beginning of next fiscal year.

So moving on to some activities to date, really the initiative started in the summer of 2019 when we formed our projects steering committee and also engaged with a countywide stakeholder team. We were very intentional and concentrated and steady in ensuring that we are taking the correct and appropriate path to getting us where we are today. That started with an effort to hire an assessment consultant to look at all those applications currently in use and help us determine what the next appropriate step would be. That led to a contract with GuideHouse, and they performed that business applications needs assessment. The key recommendation coming out of that work was that the county should acquire and implement an ERP system.

So since that time, there have been several keyboard actions that have led us to where we are today. First the board adopted a budget development policy to set aside funding annually for the ERP system. The board then authorized release of an RFP for ERP software and implementation services. This was that past summer in August 2021. And then this past fall, the board approved funding for four initial additional staff positions for the project.

The county then completed a very thorough and robust evaluation process of the proposals received as a result of that RFP, and we went ahead and issued our intent to award ERP software and implementation contracts to the top RFP proposer. So that is Accenture as the implementer providing professional services necessary to implement the software, and Workday who provides the software platform on a subscription cloud-hosted basis.

So our next steps and current activities are as follows. We are actively negotiating contracts with Accenture and Workday for the implementation project and ongoing subscription. We're on track then to seek board approval of those contracts in May, so as part of that upcoming board item we'll provide much further information on the evaluation and selection process that led to the identification of Accenture and Workday as our partners.

We will then initiate the readiness work by the Auditor-Controller, Human Resources and General Services really to ensure that when the consultants show up we are ready to go and jump into the project. And then we'll develop a preliminary multiyear change management strategy internally which will then be merged with that of Accenture's to effectively manage the change in people aspect of this project.

As we mentioned, nearly every county employee is going to be impacted. So with a lot of change, we need a really clear and effective strategy for addressing that. Then implementation scheduled to begin this July with a target go-live date for phase one, which is the financials in July of 2023. So a little over a year from now and then a target go live for the HR and payroll aspects in March of 2024. In addition to those very key first two phases there will be a third phase focused on the budget development tools that we use here as well as reporting analytics which is scheduled to go live in October of 2024 So that gets us to about two and a half years of implementation effort.

Moving on to the fiscal impacts, the ERP system really is a significant long-term investment. Both the benefits and the costs will be shared by all county departments. So we have our implementation services which are necessary in order to properly configure and implement the system here at our county which is a one time use of funds expected to take two to three years. We then have the software licensing which is an ongoing subscription cost to the cloud based platform And normally those are 5 to 10 year contracts, but in reality once you do these, these are systems that are in place for well beyond 10 years. 15, 20 sometimes more.

We will then have implementation project staffing. That is one time during the duration of the implementation effort to really ensure that we have sufficient and appropriate resources dedicated to the project. Then there's the change management and end user training. So we need to implement that strategy consistent with the change management plan, and train all of our end users initially once we implement the system as well as when new users come into the system over time. And then there's the ongoing support to optimize the system. Software is never done, and there will always be time and opportunity to fine tune and refine it so that we're using it to its optimal capabilities.

So the one-time cost of implementing the ERP system, including the internal county staffing may exceed $12 million over that two to three year implementation period. Those annual subscription costs for the ERP system will phase up as we roll out each phase of the system and may eventually exceed $2 million per year. Then the fiscal year budget for next year, 22-23 will include those costs of staffing implementation services as well as licensing to the software platform.

Finally, wanted to wrap this section up with project staffing. So additional limited term positions are needed and necessary in order to adequately staff and execute this project. We had several discussions with our peer counties that have recently undergone ERP implementation efforts. And they said the critical thing to their success or their lack thereof was dedicating sufficient and appropriate staff to the project. Consultants can only do so much. It's really our county system and our county people that need to be responsible and involved in implementing it So four positions were added this past fall into this fiscal year those have an asterisk on the slide here That's about seven hundred and one thousand dollars of the total 1.42 And we will be requesting for additional positions beginning next fiscal year in order to adequately staffed the project And these numbers really came from guidance from our guide house consultants and based on all of their experience of the level of staffing necessary in order to staff this project, as well as recommendations from a censure that they laid out clearly in their proposal of what they expect the county project team to consist of in order for them to do their work adequately and do it appropriately.

So there's the total that will be included in our next year's recommended budget. And with that, I'll turn it over to Andre to lead us into our next section. Thank you, Paul.

2:21 – 2:336 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:21:55

Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:21:56

Thank you Chairman. I just have a question about this section before we move on, if you don't mind. Thank You Mr. Lattery great presentation so since this is something that's going to be countywide will this get rolled up into our cost allocation plan so that all departments end up contributing to the cost of this not only general fund but non-general fund departments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:22:16

Absolutely. So the costs will be shared in a systematic, rational and reasonable way so that all of the users that benefit from the system are paying a portion of its cost. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:22:31

Good morning Chair Hartman and Supervisors. In February of 2020 KPMG performed their operational performance review of the General Services Department Recommendation 8.3 from the report was to elevate the role of IT and consider establishing ICT as a standalone independent department. Some of the expected benefits of a standalone department are consolidate sprawl of desperate technology solutions that exist in the county's highly decentralized information technology structure today, strengthen our cybersecurity profile and data risk profile achieve economies of scale on vendor spend, software costs and operational costs.

It will also address gaps in current IT services and support to other county departments. The County engaged Gartner Consulting to work with General Services and stakeholder departments to gather information to determine the future IT service delivery model that aligns with the County's strategic objectives For a standalone IT department. To develop the best fit direction for the county's future IT service model and to determine the technology and skill requirements needed to support the future IT service delivery model.

Gartner Consulting is also working with General Services, Human Resources and Stakeholder Departments to create a future state job architecture framework and associated job materials that will align with new and existing job roles to best practices in the IT industry. Some of the next steps required for a standalone IT department will be to onboard a Chief Information Officer, CIO With an anticipated recruitment period of April to September of 2022.

Understand and develop risk mitigation strategies to ensure a smooth transition to the future state delivery model, to develop a cost assessment and implementation budget for the standalone IT department. The full transition will likely occur over multiple fiscal years. Some of the countywide projects to transform how we do business include Microsoft M365, our website redesign project and cybersecurity enhancements as well as the public safety radio network and other projects.

With everything going on in the world today, the need for a strong cyber security posture is high. All these projects collectively increase our cyber security posture and provide departments new technology tools on how we can interact with the public. Our M365 project has made great strides. We have migrated over 5,700 mailboxes from our old on-premise servers to the cloud that equates to approximately 92% completion as of March.

Microsoft Teams adoption has increased and become the standard communication tool throughout the county as Skype for Business' end of life and being shut down We have offered 38 teams training sessions through the Microsoft Store. We have set up modern SharePoint sites as a tool for internal communications like the hybrid IT project, cybersecurity and 365 migration and a learning hub to name a few.

OneDrive is a file sharing application for anywhere in anytime access and adoption is growing to share files online in a secure and safe environment. As of March, there were over 3.3 million files stored and 25.4 thousand files shared in OneDrive. Departments are starting to use Power BI as a tool for data visualization in dashboards that are easy to read and comprehend.

Some of the next steps in our M365 project are to complete the SharePoint migration from on-premise to the cloud retire the legacy software and hardware, freeing up valuable resources to support new technologies and increase our cybersecurity posture. To also continue to develop solutions using Microsoft 365 suite of products and extract maximum value for the county from this investment.

Last April your board approved the award of the website redesign project to Civic Plus On April 26th, we plan on launching the new website for thecountyofsb.org. Over 3,000 pages were migrated from the old site to the new one. We established a website redesign greenbelt training through InnovateSBC for all webmasters throughout the county. Some of the benefits are branding and standardization so visitors have the same look and feel throughout the entire site.

Top web destinations are now available within three clicks of the homepage to help get the public what they need in a quicker timeframe and to meet constituents' expectations. Moving to Civic Plus Online from on-premise improves our reliability and availability to over 99.7% uptime and 24x7 security protection. The simplicity of the design tools and timed publishing tool will reduce the time required to update and improve the accuracy of our website.

Some of our next steps in the website redesign project will be to transition the current intranet site, County Connect along with standardizing on third party integrations like forms and calendars. There have been several cybersecurity improvements over the past year. I will highlight for your board some of the key accomplishments. The countywide security assessment recommended a program to consistently track and improve cybersecurity across the county.

This recommendation led to the Governance, Risk and Compliance otherwise known as GRC project. We have just completed the policy and compliance phase of the project, which will create yearly attestations for each department throughout the county. And give insight to cybersecurity globally throughout the county for the CISO and other executives as needed. This includes dashboards and reporting processes as well.

Another major project are M365 investment for endpoint security is replacing our McAfee product Windows Defender gives the county greater insight in the cybersecurity risks on each of the endpoints in the county and will also report back to our GRC application. Multi-factor authentication, something you know and something you have for example you know your password and you have a cell phone or some other physical device that will authorize your login in tandem has been expanded to protect county data when away from the county network Some of our next steps for cybersecurity are to finish phases two and three of the GRC project that include vulnerability management and risk management.

Installation of Albert sensors for increased 24 by seven, by 365 network monitoring. Last year in July your board approved the public safety radio network contract with EF Johnson We are currently in the detailed design review process with our stakeholder departments and doing site surveys and frequency analysis in preparation of a new world-class public safety radio network.

We have submitted formal applications for approval with the United States Forest Service to acquire and develop two greenfield sites at Figueroa Mountain and Cuyama Peak We are also working on modification or new construction of our existing towers, shelters and power. Some of our next steps for the Public Safety Radio Network Project are to receive approval from the USFS and develop these two sites, complete tower modifications at Santa Ynez Peak, adopt and finalize the detailed system design which would then lead to the start of the implementation of a new public safety radio network.

Some other projects we have underway and we are working on are combining our instances of Acela to a single instance and moving it to the cloud. This combines Public Works, cannabis and environmental health data for input and reporting along with a public facing portal to apply for permits. This will give citizens and employees a smoother experience and unified data across county functions for easier reporting.

We are also working with our criminal justice partners on a criminal justice data sharing solution that will improve timelines of the criminal justice process, an ease of managing terabytes of data that will come in each year from various sources like the new body worn cameras Procuring a system will automate workflows and reduce the need for physical media and duplicate storage by the criminal justice partners.

We are also working on Enterprise GIS that will allow the ability to integrate and work across agencies in and outside the county along with a centralized geodatabase that will create efficiencies and improve data analytics, and provide quicker data-driven decisions for disaster response and recovery as an example. This is just a brief highlight of the many digital projects we have been working on.

I'll now be available for any questions the Board may have.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:33:12

Okay, back to the Board. Well, Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:33:22

Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. This is something that is near and dear to my heart. Obviously, it's just another innovative project that our county is tackling. We've talked about in the past that this board is going after big things and this is one of them. I think this is ultimately one of those things that the public does expect and our employees expect that we move in these different directions on really becoming a 21st century government agency. And so I'm glad to see it and very supportive.

2:33 – 2:4014 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:33:53

I had a question, go ahead Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:33:57

I just was going to echo Supervisor Nelson's comments about how this is really long overdue and it's essential to modern operations in any kind of setting, and appreciate the thoroughness and thoughtfulness that has gone into planning this. You know doing these big technological advancement projects are often fraught but I really feel like this has been super well thought out and strategic and we're not going to make the mistakes that too many agencies have made about stumbling through this process so thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:34:28

I had a question about the annual cost for the subscriptions cost for the ERP program. And recently, I had a furnace and had to replace the thermostat and it turns out you're held hostage to a very expensive thermostat if you have a certain kind of furnace. So I guess, I want to make sure we're not in that situation investing so much in the ERP and you said 15 years at least would be the lifetime of the system.

That they couldn't raise that cost for subscription can you negotiate that up front?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:35:08

Chair Harmon, wow you took a page right out of our negotiation handbook. And that is and we're in the middle actually reaching the end of our negotiations with both Acela and Workday. And the containment cost, if I just put on a budgeting hat, budgeting when you're looking at forecasting you want to be able to have pretty secure numbers and know what those numbers are going out in future fiscal years and not have any surprises or big increases and not be held hostage to your point And so as part of our negotiations, we are pushing, when I say we, our negotiation team is Mr. Slattery and myself and Ms. Pell, are pushing Workday to do something they have never done before which is look at a term that goes beyond that initial five years. They've done five years and even a ten-year, five additional year option for a total of ten years.

They've done that with other clients. They've never gone beyond that. Without trying to reveal what's coming up in May, I think we will be there first. And the purpose there really is to have predictable costs. To not find ourselves in a position where we're held hostage that we are incurring a spike in cost that we were not able to plan for. So I believe what we will bring to your board, and we've gotten preliminary numbers back from them.

I think we'll come to the board with a 15-year agreement. And that's really unprecedented for them but I think critical for us as we manage that cost going forward. And we're going to extract value out of that to bringing the total costs of the system down. So reduce our risk, have some predictability and achieve savings by doing that.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:36:56

Terrific and then I just had another question Teams why is that the best? I haven't had the training or the explanation and just wanted to know more about that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:37:11

Thank You chair Hartman teams is really a highly transformational piece in the m365 project it's not just a Communications tool. It's a communications and collaboration tool that can be used within the county as well as folks that are outside of the county as well, and all of the new innovation is now coming from Microsoft into teams. At some point in time, you will also see Teams replace your Outlook client for communication. So email will basically be kind of put into Teams and the Teams messaging is kind of starting now to replace email as a communication tool.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:37:53

Okay. Supervisor Nelson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:37:57

yes, Jeremy. Yeah during that presentation I send a note to my team say we got we have to do the conversion over to This in 365 platform I know a lot of us love our zoom and our Google Docs and all of our other tools that we've used to make it work but I think at this point at least for my office and This is the future and so we all need to get on board as an organization And I'm gonna take that to heart with my own small organization

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:38:26

Well, you're a good model and inspiration for us. Oh do you have training?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:38:32

We do have training and we have training available that we've done with Microsoft and we can set up individual training For board members as well if you guys would like

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:38:42

Looks like it's coming. We've got a model of what we preach. Mr. Frapwell, your quote is – we've had wonderful quotes but yours is really the one that sticks in my head. We fall to the level of our systems. We don't rise to our goals, fall to the level of our systems. And that is such hard work putting those systems into place but it's happening and you're doing it in an intelligent way that is very deliberate and I have a lot of confidence.

I think I've mentioned these things can really crash and burn and we've all seen that happen huge investment and then a big disaster But I think this is going to work and it's really going to be great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:35

Chair Hartman and Supervisor, so Andre mentioned this just to keep you abreast. So we are in the recruitment for a Chief Information Officer, a CIO, and we have two members of the board on a subcommittee, Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Nelson. And you haven't made the decision to make it independent IT department. We're still doing the research for that but we are in the process of a recruitment and that person will be an assistant CEO until which time the board decides which your board will also be part of the selection process. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:40:01

Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:40:02

Madam Clerk any public comment on this item? Chair Hartman and members of the board we have no request to speak on this special issue regarding digital transformation updates.

2:40 – 2:582 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.802:40:12

All right thank you so turning to our final special issue our ARPA funding update and ACO Anderson who's also our budget director

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:40:33

Thank you, Chair Hartman. This is the ARPA funding update special issue and I did want to take this time to introduce and really thank Nicole Parmalee and Ted Tabor of our office for the many hours they spend managing the administration and reporting of ARPA. It is a huge undertaking. It is what we consider a budget within a budget. Really appreciate their time and effort. Also, I want to acknowledge from the Auditor-Controller's Office Jeremy Sturs and Robert Geis for all their accounting guidance and compliance review that they've done to date.

So this presentation, we're going to look to achieve three things. We want to update your board on where we left off on October 19th which was our last major discussion on ARPA. So we'll recap the board allocations and those remaining balances. We want to discuss what changes have occurred since October 19th. You may recall we were awaiting final rule that has finally been received as of January 6, and then we do have some adjustments to prior approved projects so we wanted to go over with your board.

And then how should the remaining balances be allocated? And we'll go through some staff recommendations similar to how we presented in October on what some of the funding projects should be. So where do we leave off on October 19th for that discussion? Here is a tranche breakdown after the discussion. And just going down the first column where we have, we had a tranche one, a tranche two, what your board has committed to date and then the remaining balance. And how will you look at ARPAs? We kind of put it into two buckets. One is discretionary that's related to lost revenue and the other is restricted category And of course, we have the total ARPA funds. So under the Lost Revenue Discretionary column that we had under tranche one all of the lost revenue calculation was associated to tranche one.

So that was $26.6 million. We don't have any lost revenue discretionary in the tranche two category. Your board has approved allocations of $8.8 million of that funding to date with a remaining balance of 17.77. Under the restricted bucket the tranche one Allocation included sixteen point eight million dollars tranche two forty three point four million The board has committed a total of forty three point seven million of those funds with remaining balance is sixteen point five million Both of which we'll be discussing today So here's just another flow view of the ARPA funding where the county is receiving 86.7 million, we have the two tranches equaling each other, tranche 1 received in 21-22, tranche 2 to be received in 22-23 So of tranche one, we've got lost revenue discretionary bucket of 26.5 million, a restricted of 16.8 million under the district discretionary bucket, we've got the committed 8.8 million and the remaining 17.7.

For tranche one, the restricted is 16.80 with a fully committed allocation under that tranche. For tranche two, there's $43.4 million. It's all restricted and your board on October 19th allocated 26.9 million of that with the remaining 16.5 million of which we will discuss today. So we just wanted to provide your board with a reminder of what that restrictive funding versus discretionary funding buckets are isolated to. Restrictive funding is very specific to categories within ARPA rule.

They are to support public health response, address negative economic impacts, premium pay for essential workers, services to disproportionately impacted communities The ARP administrative expenses and infrastructure specifically related to water, sewer and broadband. The discretionary funding was related to lost revenue. It's a calculation that was done by the auditor controller There is more flexibility on this spending for government services with few exceptions it cannot be used for debt settlements or replenishing any reserves So committed to date, your board has allocated $52.5 million as we were separating into the two buckets for discretionary that 8.8 approximately 4.8 million went to the CIP priority projects and four million dollars went to road maintenance under the restricted category 43.7 million a portion of that went to the COVID response administration 9.4 million We had $3.4 million in infrastructure and a bulk of the spending has gone towards that health and human services plan that we'll go a little bit more into detail here on.

So for the Health and Human Services Plan, the board has committed $30.9 million to date that includes behavioral health allocation of 2.2 million, community health and well-being of 5.1 million, disaster resilience of 750,000, economic recovery of 350,000 housing and homelessness of 22.3 million, and organizational technology of 210,000. So what's changed since October? We talked about this briefly on the final rule. It was issued January 6 of 2022, and in that there was a lot of comments from municipalities seeking guidance on the spending of these funds. They did add new guidance that was of particular interest to us in regard to IT infrastructure and data resources.

And greater flexibility and clarification related to court backlog, crime intervention, rehiring public service staff. That has led to some general backfill opportunity that we're going to discuss on the next slide. We are pleased to note that we are in the process of negotiating with our consultants so should be on board here soon. So in regard to the general fund backfill opportunities, these are projects or programs that your board has approved within the budget with general fund sources already. That could be reimbursed and used towards other board priorities so we've identified based on the updated guidance Some court backlog opportunity that your board approved in the last fiscal budget, criminal injustice data discovery costs, technology infrastructure.

And we did find that the co-response teams fall within this opportune time and we knew that we were losing some grant revenue and general fund cost was going to have to cover it. With all of these, we took into consideration that there is an ongoing source for any positions that would be available once ARPA funding ended. But it would provide your board on a three-year basis additional one time funding that will be available for discretionary use.

So that totals 5.9 million over the three-year period and each year that those costs are incurred your board would be able to use that funding for other sources we what we have done this year is put you may recall about 955,000 from the HVAC projects that your board has already approved into emerging issues And you are considering that for allocation later today so that's how the process will work for the backfill opportunities and We also did want to talk about some adjustments that were to prior projects, and we anticipate that this will be something we'll address really through the three-year period simply because we have projects that are estimated. So our actual costs as departments move forward with implementation could be over or under estimate, so we may have to deal with those differences.

In addition, through a review with the auditor and the consultant that's coming on board We may find that some categorization changes may need to happen, so we may need to convert it from one category to another. We do anticipate as indicated that we will see some of these changes over the next three years and we'll bring those periodically to the board is necessary.

So since October 19th, we've had three adjustments that we've identified and wanted to bring to your board's attention And here are the three. The first is you may recall that seven million dollars was originally set aside for an IV homeless facility and the intent at the time was provided to apply for home key grant funding and And the CSD department actually received that. So the adjusted cost ended up being $1,424,043. So the adjustment would be a reduction of that 7 million by 5,575,957.

And as part of that grant process, there was an agreement to have five-year services committed. So for the IV services were 400 shelter beds were increasing having to increase costs by $1,448,176. The third item is one of the items that comes from a conversion From one bucket of funding source to another Your board approved the comprehensive economic development strategy or SEDS report in the final rule. They clarified that To be acceptable for discretionary funding but not restricted so we are converting that from the restricted bucket to The discretionary, so it's a wash in totality It is shifting the buckets total For the total net adjustments, we have $4,127,781 that's being added back to allocation for today and you'll see that on the next slides.

So now the updated tranche breakdown after the adjustments. If you go to the adjustments line, we have a $150,000 is now shifted to the discretionary bucket for remaining balance of $17.6 million for allocation and discretionary and $4,277,781 has been added to the restricted so it's increased the remaining balance to $20.7 million. So how should the remaining balances be allocated?

We followed the same practice as we did on the October 19th, providing you a staff recommendation in addition to providing lists and exhaustive list of projects that are eligible. But certainly there just isn't enough resources available to cover them. So we're gonna start with the discretionary funding recommendation Just as a reminder that discretionary funding is eligible towards governmental services it is flexible Flexible for your board. It excludes debt legal settlements and reserves remaining balance was seventeen point seven We've adjusted it four hundred fifty thousand With an adjusted remaining balance of seventeen point six million So, we looked at the best use of this for various projects and we identified a critical project for the county that requires significant general fund capital and cash investment starting with fiscal year 22-23 if an alternative source is not available.

And that project was discussed in the digital transformation presentation as well. This is the public safety radio network replacement project It's an estimated one-time project cost about 30 million dollars We plan to have debt financing of about 12 million of that and the general fund or alternative source would need to cover the remaining 18 And it's, this project is extremely critical to the county. It is a system that handles all our 911 and interagency emergency communications.

The current system is no longer supported with parts and updates resulting in county risk exposure. So staff recommends using the remaining discretionary funding to pay for the general fund portion of this project. In regard to the restricted funding recommendation, staff has prioritized as indicated similar as we did in October projects for final consideration by your board. We also provided an attachment B if you want details on some of the projects, the full 59 projects that are listed.

So there's approximately 59 projects, only 116 million. Clearly we only have 20.7 million remaining That's from the 16.5 million from October with an adjustment for the IV homeless project of 4.1 million for remaining balance at $20.7 million Once again, we took into prioritization various things that included for priority were there any direct COVID-19 response costs administration compliance reporting General fund backfill opportunity which we did find And any mandated sewer water infrastructure projects that would be impacting the general fund if we did not pay it with an ARPA source We did identify some projects that were qualified at least one for census tracts and That serve communities or would improve access to meetings We do have one-time costs and department expansion requests related to court backlog And we do have some critical health and health and human services needs as part of the HH plan HHS plan which would round out the allocations So here's the proposed remaining restrictive funding recommendation.

We've got 5.9 in general fund backfill projects and accord court backlog, data discovery, IT infrastructure co-response all of which is already in the budget. Project clean water mandates these are increases your board allocated some previously and there's increased costs related to those for a total of $6.7 million. We've added the Ivy Community Center sewer replacement and other improvements. This is within a qualifying census tract of 532,000. We've added hearing room improvements with closed captioning at 400,000 and there's two expansion requests requested by the district attorney and public defender to cover court backlog within their departments And then the remaining is one-time projects and ongoing Related to the health and human services plan and that those are detailed on the next slide.

We'll come back to this slide because It totals the twenty point seven million dollars So for the HHS plan detail, it totals nearly $10.8 million and it covers organization and technology, community well-being, housing and homelessness, and then disaster resiliency. And all the detail is provided. I do have Terry Nisich here too if you have any questions related to these lists specifically but the intent was to show you the detail of the 10.7.

We also have other eligible projects for restrictive funding. Unfortunately, these exceed the available ARPA funding. We do have expansion requests from the Sheriff's Office that would qualify. One of the things that we looked at as part of recommendation is if there is an ongoing source, would it cause what we're calling a funding cliff similar to homelessness in out years after ARPA?

So all of these are ongoing costs. ARPA is not an ongoing cost, ongoing source but these are eligible projects for funding These are projects that you saw in the October 19th presentation for CSD Parks. They have a total of $34.7 million in various parks projects. Public Works also identified some priority projects, totaling $52.6 million. And then we had some other requests that were outstanding one from the South Coast Chamber Economic Development Strategy may recall this is initially 50,000 for an economic development strategy report they've added some grant funding request to that initial request and then we had a request from well path for temporary pay increase for their nursing staff and And then we do have the HVAC projects that are, ARPA has funded multiple other HVAC projects that we're taking advantage of and certainly there are more on the list.

So in summary, the staff has made some recommendations to allocate the $17.6 million of discretionary funding to the Public Safety Radio Network replacement project and allocate $20.7 million of restrictive funding to the projects identified on slide 22. Projects not funded by ARPA can certainly be considered for other one-time funds By your board and we'll be going over that those totals later today And we're looking at your board consider the recommendations and provide direction on projects and funding to be incorporated in the recommended June budget hearings With that I'm happy to answer any questions you may have Supervisor Williams

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:58 – 3:1024 turns

CommentTOT It'sProposed2:58:46

Well I really appreciate this level of detail and summary because it's important to understand the context of what we've already invested. Is it, it was, it's not altogether clear but I think it is so I'm asking the question. After assuming we agree with these recommendations, what would be left of ARPA is that $955,000 that was in Monday's presentation. And that's it or that's just the one from one of those two tranches?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:34

Supervisor Williams through the chair, so the $955,000 was a conversion back in October. So that is available to your board in emerging issues. That's a county general fund reserve. So that's free and clear for your board to allocate later today and it's part of the four million that we talked about on day one In addition to that the backlog, I'm sorry the general fund backfill projects and let me back up to Slide So similar to the $955,000 that was made available to your board through through the budget.

It would be an additional that $2,178,868 if your board approves the staff recommendations that would also be added to the amount of funding that your board would have be able to allocate for 22-23 as one time funding And hopefully that answered your question.

CommentTOT It'sProposed3:00:52

It does, though that amount goes down over three years, right? So we would have to watch out about...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:01:00

Correct, we would make your board aware each year of what that amount is. The reason in 22-23 is there's some one time, most of these are associated to ongoing funding but there is a technology infrastructure that's 250,000 that's one time funding.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:01:16

Supervisor Lavinino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:01:18

Thank you, Madam Chair. Can we go to slide 22 for a second? So I'm trying to marry this up with the expansion requests that we heard from different departments so if we would approve these recommendations in both the public defender and district attorney's office positions are good But how does that differ? Those are line items. What is that underneath the subtotals? Okay, those are subtotals, okay. So what else is in that 5.9 million of the court backlog?

So then it says data discovery. Are those other positions? Because I noticed public defender and both DA are also looking for data or maybe just the public defender data positions. So what are those?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:02:02

Let me go back to that. I apologize because it breaks it down better So we have $1.4 million that was approved in the previous year budget, and this is for a three-year period I believe it's for public defender positions that is already in the budget so we would just in lieu of giving the department GFC we would cover that with ARPA funding and that GFC would be made available in these buckets.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:02:33

Okay but those aren't the expansion requests that we also heard? Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:02:37

They were funded in fiscal year 21-22,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:02:40

right? So but there is ARPA funding available so let's go back to 22 for a second okay so that's your top line is what you're saying it's part of the 5.9 then this next one down So then part of that 20.7 is the court backlog DA, court backlog public defender. Okay so that answers that question now let's go to 23. The $600,000 for senior nutrition assessment and gaps funding who's doing that?

This has been something I've asked for, for a long time. So I'm glad we're doing this. It seems like everybody and their brother every organization provides senior nutrition but we always have issues.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:03:31

Good morning chair members of the board to answer that question. We've set aside that $600,000 so that the Department of Social Services in conjunction with our office could actually begin that deeper dive to see how services are provided countywide and see if we could do a better job of coordinating amongst all the different agents

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:03:49

So part of that $600,000 isn't the study to do it. It's to provide gap funding?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:03:54

Correct. We'll be tucking aside the money if needed and that is our estimate.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:03:58

All right then my last question is slide 26. This is the part I'm struggling with okay so these are also on our expansion requests and these are They're eligible, but they exceed the ARPA funding.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:04:21

That's correct and they have an ongoing component.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:04:24

Correct So this brings me to a question about it seems like we have we have This is going to be a little controversial I think but so we have two pots of money We call it one time or we call it ongoing On sometimes it seems like what we've done because of ARPA is we've kind of established a new. Trunch of or a new set of 3 year funding, which I like because it kind of gives us although it creates a cliff in the 4th year.

It also. gives us the ability to find out, is this a program that we want to keep around? Is this worthy of us trying to find funding during those three years. I like this idea of it's not just one time. We don't have to commit to it for life. And what I'm interested in is actually And you can tell me that this is a terrible budget principle, but I would like to take one-time money now. I mean, I think we have like $4 million.

Tell me what's wrong with saying okay, I want the Orchid Community Resource Deputy and I know it's an ongoing cost. But take that one time money set it aside and say I wanna give it a three year run which is $700,000 And use one-time money to do that. And then we could, between now and three years from now find out if we could continue to fund that or get resource deputy or if after the three year so that somewhere in your budget you would have that JAWS which I know we hate because we like that all line up for five years but you know we would be creating a problem in four years So I don't think we've ever done that before outside of ARPA, but is that something what do you think about that thought process? Because we just don't have any ongoing money to deal with.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:06:31

Right so Supervisor Lavinio through the chair. So how we would typically do that is you have a five-year forecast now that we provide you, and we would incorporate anything that's an ongoing impact into that future outlook to see what the bottom line would be. And then as we have made recommendations to your board in the past, your board has been very prudent about setting aside funding now for things that we know are going to be an issue down the road.

It is definitely something that we can work with. The department needs to be clear that we're trying to find an alternative source and what that direction would be from your board.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:07:16

CEO Miyasato?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:07:19

So Supervisor, I guess the short answer is yes you could do that. I think the longer answer is because we are doing that for the homeless programs to be frank. Right. For ARPA money and then we see this cliff of five million dollars that will have to Be paid if we want to continue those programs and so you can do that. We would be creating the cliffs ourself It might be worth it to your board, but we're I guess what? Nancy is saying that Because it's difficult for the board to cut a program and I'm being very blunt It's difficult for the board to cut programs, especially if they're successful and we want to continue it. It's difficult to cut a program or cut somewhere else to continue to fund it. We as a prudent strategy would put it in the five-year forecast and know the board would like this to continue and we'd always be keeping on the list.

And what she's saying is that in our existing five-year forecast there's no room to add because we show that we're going to be in deficits in a couple years out and we just balance over the five year. Now, having said that we don't know what the future holds. And for other positions what we've said is we'd like, we make it clear with the department anything you hire into this position is for a limited term.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:08:29

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:08:30

And the letters that they sign I think for management positions say you take this job knowing it's a limited term. Now for the Sheriff's Office it could be very different because it's how they staff and I think we do that for managers but I don't believe we do that for representative employees because that's a different issue.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:08:48

Yeah, and the only reason I'm thinking about it this year is just because we've had so much one-time money available through ARPA that I don't really see too much on the one time calendar that piques my interest as opposed to some of the things that are ongoing that I find very critical but we just don't have one time money for. So it's kind of got me thinking about taking one time and funding things for three or four years with that one time money Obviously, that's a discussion that we'll have but okay. Thank you

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:09:22

Supervisor Nelson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:09:23

Yes. Thank you chair Hartman I want to keep on this slide and I'm going to Broadly discuss what supervisor Lavigno mentioned that you know, I think it might create what your proposing might create an opportunity for a department To trial a program and then maybe decide two or three years down the line whether It's worth keeping that program or getting rid of something that's existing within their own organization to replace it with. Because it's really hard to start up a new position within the department while cutting somewhere else, and so kind of creating your own service level reduction internally. So being able to do that through this process may be a benefit to the board. I'm just throwing that out there as part of the broad discussion.

So that was first part. Specifically on this slide though, the co-response expansion. So there's five teams And a pretty large number. Is that scalable? Is there is there a cost on one team, two teams? I just want to try to understand that better as we look at that really critical program but at the same time that's a big number and it can be hard to swallow all at once.

3:10 – 3:157 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:10:32

Supervisor Nelson through the chair, I believe that's the case. I know we have sheriff representation here but in their nodding yes they can break that down to a team component

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:10:47

And then I just have one more question. I just wanted to understand a little bit better about the backlog of the cases and that number we had, we have three for the public defender, we have two for the DA's office and both very important but usually it's kind of flipped right? Is there more cases that the DA is handling than the public defender or they only have a portion of that backlog or how are we doing that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:11:11

Supervisor, through the chair actually our representatives of the Public Defender's Office here, LaMere do you want to address that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:11:21

Yes, good morning Supervisor Nelson through the chair. The difference in the numbers there comes down to the difference in responsibilities so for the DA's there are various types of cases some of them involve people some of them are victimless so it may be property maybe say for example driving under the influence where there is no accident where there's no person That is harmed in that for every single case that the public defender works with there is a person There is a client that there is time to talk with find records out about and we've seen some of the statistics of People who with substance use issues homelessness issues that sort of thing. So for each each person We are a group of people working with people And that also includes The time, effort and energy that it takes to sometimes even just to connect.

So to find people who are unhoused and are dealing with other types of dysfunction.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:12:32

Thank you. I don't want to turn this into a last budget hearing but I would like to hear from the district attorney on that as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:12:42

Supervisor Nielsen to the chair. Okay, four different issues. For every case a Deputy District Attorney deals with there is a person so I don't know where the illusion that there's no person was just given to you because I'm trying to picture a situation The District Attorney's Office always has more cases than the Public Defender's Office because cases are defended by private counsel, by CDA and by the Public Defender's Office. There is a backlog. We have 100% of the prosecution backlog.

When we submitted the idea that we needed two additional positions, it was based upon balancing the request of general funds. Not based on this funding at all. If this funding is available then of course we'd want three positions. Of course we would. But when we make a presentation to you and say we need an investigator, we need support staff, we need lawyers, we're going to try to give you balanced requests.

So that's the first response. The second is as to the two data and as the one-time funding, let me talk about two data people first. We talked about the tsunami. I think that was the same word used by the public defender of what's coming to us. We have to be able to get that discovery out and we need those two data people regardless of what decisions we make about dams There's a little confusion in my mind about whether it was set aside for last year. In my mind, it was so I didn't include it in this year's ask and then I started to hear about other positions that had been moved over to this. So please understand in whatever form it comes to us we do need those two people whether it was last year set aside or something else new.

And finally, as to one-time funding. We want ongoing funding for all the right reasons. We wanna have secure programs but of course if the choice is one time funding versus no funding our office is going to ask for that one time funding. Any questions? Thank you so much for asking

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:14:52

and thank you. Thank you Deidre and so I guess my only comment on that one was that it does seem that There's some throughput with that backlog, right? And so it does need to be somewhat leveled. You know if we you know put three Public defenders, only two DAs. We might get stuck because the DA can only process them as fast as they can process with the resources that they have. So just as we look at that as a board and deliberate on that I think some equity there might accomplish what we're trying to get done by funding those backlogs is it? We don't want one to be ahead of or behind the other. We want them to move in concert so just something to consider.

3:15 – 3:187 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:15:37

Any other questions? Supervisor Lavanino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.883:15:40

Thank you Madam Chair and just in a I guess in the spirit of equality, I mean I don't know if it's going to be two or three but I agree that both need to be the same

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:15:59

CEO Miyasato, did you have something to add?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:03

No. I think that the board or at least a couple of board members have expressed on this issue. I just remind you that on the up above number, the 5.9 includes we said data discovery positions that the board We sized it to include the needs from the departments, but we're still in that process working with retired Judge Cheryl Ellsworth. But I do want to mention that at that time The flip side of is that the public defender did not put in positions in that data discovery chunk they are now in this budget request, but they didn't back then and So if we're going to talk about equity, we should probably look at the whole thing, a parity between the public defender and the DAs regarding the data discovery and the backlog. I'm just mentioning that.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:16:54

I wanted to follow up on the senior nutrition if I may because this is an issue that people that there's so much interest surrounding it. We're having, we've allocated $600,000 and we're doing a gaps analysis. I mean could you elaborate a little more because are we looking at alternatives and to suggest something? Just saying who's not fed isn't really going to deal with this system very well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:17:26

Yes, Chair and members of the board. We have not yet began scoping the study. We would certainly begin that shortly with this funding but that was the goal is to really take a look at the bigger picture through COVID we saw that certain groups were having great difficulty attaining reliable meal services and we did that initial study as you recall and about I believe 100,000 was allocated 200,000 was allocated out throughout the communities to work to close the gaps And during that time, we just found that there may be additional needs throughout the community. And this would be that opportunity to take that deeper dive and then see what was in fact needed to close a gap in a longer term approach.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:18:06

So if I'm understanding it, it's more than just closing gaps. It's really what is a better system better approach? Yes, okay All right Seeing no other questions Do we have any public comment on this madam clerk

3:18 – 4:2713 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:18:22

chair Hartman and members of the board We do have two requests to speak on this special issue And we will be going to zoom to begin with Spencer Brandt to be followed by Daryl Sheck Spencer And Spencer, we have unmuted you on our end.

PresenterSpencer BrandtIsla Vista Community Services District Board of Directors and I want to speak inProposedself-stated3:18:47

Hello can you hear me?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:18:50

Yes, we can.

PresenterSpencer BrandtIsla Vista Community Services District Board of Directors and I want to speak inProposedself-stated3:18:51

Oh, excellent. Thank you. Good morning board. I'm Spencer Brandt the president of the Isla Vista Community Services District Board of Directors and I want to speak in support of the ARPA allocation for the Isla Vista Community Center and thank staff for recommending that allocation. The Isla Vista Community Services District leases the Islan Vista Community Center building from the county which we safely reopened in January of this year We operate this building and provide programming to Isla Vista youth, families and young adults. This programming includes dance classes, exercise classes, computer literacy training as well as rentable space for Isla Vista residents.

We've made a really intentional effort to provide programming that serves the many youth and families that live in Isla Vista who really historically have been chronically underserved. Isla Vista has really dreamed of having a community center for 50 years, and after the redevelopment agency was dissolved in 2012, the county really stepped up to work with the state preserve this important facility for public use. And has continued the process of rehabilitating the building. Over the past decade, important improvements have been made including replacement of the roof and HVAC systems as well as structural enhancements. While there has been progress made, there are still outstanding issues to be resolved. As referenced in the staff report, sewer line repairs and ADA compliance improvements are needed.

I have to give a huge shout out to our district staff who have worked diligently to beautify and adapt the interior of the space to be very suitable for public use. I invite the board, if you're ever in Isla Vista stop by and enjoy some of our programming and see what it's become. But there are glaring issues that still exist, including the lack of a floor and baseboards as well as soil slopage issues that have caused water damage. So again I just really want to thank the board for considering this important project to better serve the residents of Isla Vista and for making Isla Vista priority.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:21:01

Thank you we will now go to Daryl Sheck who is our final speaker.

PresenterDaryl Scheckrepresenting many county employeesProposedself-stated3:21:12

Good afternoon, Chair Hartman and Board of Supervisors. My name is Daryl Scheck, SEIU Local 620 Executive Director representing many county employees. And we know that we're under an MOU through June of 2024. And we appreciate the agreement that was struck when it was struck back then but a lot has happened since then. I need to inform the board that our members are getting absolutely hammered by the rocketing cost of living which for LA Long Beach Anaheim was eight and a half percent increase from March of 2021 through March of 2022, while those that we represent received a 3% increase in October of 2021 which leaves the pay gap of over 5%.

From what I understand, the county received approximately $18,000 equivalent for employee through ARPA. Some agencies have seen these inflationary pressures and offered significant relief to those that we represent. For example, the city of Santa Maria, those we represent receive some significant one-time funds to facilitate retention of employees in other jurisdictions like the city of Goleta also done this.

While we know we're under contract, our members who are your employees are watching what is unfolding with a great deal of concern. We hope that you're constantly evaluating the situation and that you understand the hits that they are taking. We ask you to remember that no one has a crystal ball to predict the future and what was supposed to be a short-term transitory inflation appears to me much longer term and harmful I want to thank Supervisor Hart for pointing out that we actually may have a competitive advantage now with regards to internalizing labor at the I think it's important for us to make sure that we're doing the right thing with the county rather than contracting things out.

DA and public defender and the co-response teams. I think we appreciate the money that's being put towards those, in particular the co-response teams. We've asked at, you know, from the County in the past to try and get money towards our members that are going out there on the frontline and that are part of those co-responsed teams with mental health and be well. So we would really appreciate to see that money going forward.

And I'll just say that please prioritize our members who are your employees as we go forward And try to plan for the future with the budget, with them in mind as well. And I just want to thank you for your time.

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:23:56

Thank you

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role3:23:58

and that concludes public comment.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:24:00

Okay so we have a choice do we want to have Miss Anderson give us our budget workshop summary before lunch or?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:09

Supervisors we would prefer to after because we do need to regroup during lunch. That's when our staff looks at all

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:24:14

the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:15

comments.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.803:24:15

All right so 45 minutes for lunch come at quarter after one minutes is enough 115 more back So after a lunch break, we're reconvening our budget workshops for fiscal year 2022 and 23. And we're about to go to our budget workshop summary. And ACEO and Budget Director Nancy Anderson would you provide us or CEO Miyasato do you want to introduce it first?

4:27 – 4:335 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:27:52

Yeah, thank you board members and just before we get into the nitty gritty of the budget summary. I want to take a moment to adjust if you could look at the screen as well It's just a recap about what we've done in the last one and a half two and a half days And just to remind us why we're here, I know we get to this point where everyone's looking at their expansion requests. But just to remind the board you have $1.4 billion of services that we're proposing in the preliminary budget and all your departments are geared as we said to reset, reconnect and reimagine what the county can be and what our community can be in the near future.

And that we have a lot of opportunity and that we are also trying to do as these slides indicate We're trying to build anew. We are knowing that change is continuously in process, it's a struggle sometimes. That we know that in this budget you're looking for us to go upstream and resolve problems before they come to the catastrophes or the crises. You're planting seeds for the future. You're making a difference, and that we are taking action to fulfill your vision. So I want to thank the departments again for providing quotes and just remind us that's where we are and not to lose sight of that as we start looking at these requests for more from your departments.

And with that, so thank you to the very youthful Terry Nisich and Sarah Gill in our office who put that together. That was

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:29:26

great by the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:29:27

way having all those quotes really appreciate that. So we are now at the time of the budget workshop summary. And as we've said, our fiscal outlook is very stable. Revenue's expected to meet operational needs. We've talked about our five-year forecast and discretionary revenues. And again because of the five-year forecast and what we showed, we have minimal ongoing revenues Compared to prior years for service expansion, but there are no service level reductions. We still have some key challenges you heard from our departments We know there's volatility still in the cannabis tax revenue side of things and your board has made important investments And we're continuing to make those investments And just overall, these are the things that your board has asked us to focus on and that we're continuing in this budget as we have in past budgets as well.

I'm not going to go through the slides but that, as you saw, were themes throughout the departments. And with that, I'm going to hand it over to Ms. Anderson who will go through where we are on the summary and expansion requests.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:30:32

Chair Hartman and members of the board. We're here to the end, and Mona's kind of recapped what we've talked about for the last several days. But we're back to our expansion requests. So this is all a recap of the information that has been provided to you over the past several days. So starting with community services, we've got zero emission transportation specialists, one FTE, HCD accountants, two FTEs.

Some cultural arts master plan implementation, ongoing cost parks pavement rehabilitation. Better Avia Valley of Light artwork expansion for district attorney their post conviction relief unit of one point five FTE cyber crimes unit investigator one FTE and deputy district attorneys for their backlog of two FTE. And those are on our list for planning and development. They had two options long rate for long range planning One within a consultant of one-time funds of $562,500 or an ongoing option with the team for FTE. A public defender had requests for public defenders for backlog of three. These are on the ARPA list.

Data analyst of one FTE and legal office professionals for discovery of three FTE. Public works PCI requests at 3.1 million, and general cost increases of 4.8 million. The sheriff had requests for co-response expansion of seven FTE, a narcotics team of five FTE human trafficking detective of one FTE cannabis compliance team of five FTE An Orca and Montecito Community Resource Deputies of 2 FTE.

A Sheriff Service Technicians for the NBJ at 6 FTE, an Accounting Supervisor of 1 FTE, and a Sheriff Service Technicians Investigators for 2 FTE. Treasurer Tax Collector I had a request for three veteran service representatives and one TOT compliance position. And then we had, we talked about some new requests, one for the county executive office related to the Waterfront Infrastructure Feasibility Study General Services for the EV infrastructure project and just most recently districts 3 & 5 mentioning the North County Youth Safety Programs And so we've added an amount here similar to what's in the South County.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:33:05

And Supervisors, just to remind you if you have your binder and tab three this morning there was a revised expansion request that includes other comments.

4:33 – 4:412 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:33:17

We also talked this today about the priority CIP list, so these are just those same projects listed. We talked about the unfunded HVAC projects that were also ARPA eligible. We talked about the proposed discretionary funding recommendation for the public safety radio. And then we have the proposed remaining restricted funding recommendation of the 20.7 for The ARPA ARPA funding that for the discussion, we just had Based on that discussion We just put just so you could see a revised option if your if you're looking to consider keeping district attorney and public defender equal That would leave a balance of about four hundred forty-four thousand six hundred for HVAC projects or other eligible member has to be an eligible project That would be available Just a reminder we talked about this on Monday that Because we have little general fund available for ongoing requests and the five year forecast obviously is indicating that We are going to be tight And county fiscal planning is gonna be imperative For high priority requests, your board can consider having our office work with departments further and recommend reductions to their budgets to fund requests or alternatives.

Evaluate in terms of risk and liability cost savings are discretionary versus mandatory. Review non-general fund sources not already evaluated I use one-time funds for pilots that set expectations of end dates. Your board brought that up today as well, and for longer term options have our office evaluate other potential revenue measures. So where we've left it is the funding available is general fund contribution of $339,100 ongoing and about $6.2 million of one time that comprises cannabis tax revenue of $3.1 million, the $955,000 from the HVAC prior ARPA backfills And new ARPA-approved backfill projects, assuming your board approves that recommendation from our office is $2,178,868. So that's the totality of the funding sources.

Here's some of the key issues that we've heard over the last few days. We started with the Health and Human Services Functional Group, and we heard that your board wants to hear more about CalAIM implementation and impacts to the county, and our office is working with those impacted departments, and they're looking to bring a presentation to your board sometime in July.

We also talked about a proposed ARP allocation to child care. Your board has already approved $2 million allocation in a previous allocation, but Forbes 5 staff was working to bring back a presentation on how that should be allocated and they're planning to do that on May 3rd. We also heard from the general government and support services, specifically with the Treasurer Tax Collector. And we've committed to meeting with the treasurer to explore use of their ICRP 200,000 and other alternatives to help perhaps restore or consider their expansions.

There was general—we heard general support for the Veterans Services representative positions at some level, and those were three FTE at 109,700 each. For the public safety departments, we heard that your board would like to hear in June more information on breakout employees leaving the fire department and what's driving their 60% retention rate. Also for the fire department related to co-response return with information, the possibility of fire assisting with co-response.

And we heard that the legislative, to refer to the Legislative Committee to explore funding sources and alternatives to address AB 625 affecting the public defender indigent defense workload. As well as other legislation such as Care Court that we also are aware of. For the community resources and public facilities, your board talked with the Ag Commissioner to explore the State Grant Funding for Farmworker Resource Center program when that's available.

Our understanding is they've developed a working group and those will be working towards grant requirements and then issuing NOFA. Some time in the future. So we will be looking for that Then for regard to CSD staff just proactively communicating with the library folks on what's happening in the budget For policy any exact? We heard that There is support for some general support for the waterfront infrastructure feasibility study expansion It is on the list for your consideration Support for North County youth services expansion. We've added that on behalf of district 3 and 5 With that for today we are looking at your board approve as part of the recommendation the policy disaster recovery reserve that we have discussed is To maintain a minimum reserve of three million dollars in that fund In general county programs to fund the repair of County infrastructure damage during disasters when no other state or federal reimbursement Or other available funding can be identified We are looking that you provide direction on any expansion requests or capital projects be included in the recommended budget or defer to hearings And providing input or direction on other items including our special issues that you heard today.

I After budget workshops, our office will work with the auditor controller. We'll review and revise as necessary on general fund discretionary revenue estimates based on any new information that's available so we'll be finalizing essentially all of our numbers And including incorporating any direction that we receive from your board today We will complete our schedules and this the Recommended budget will be released in late May In the final budget hearings will be on June 14th and potentially held over to the 15th And just a reminder that revenues expenditure estimates are still subject to change over the next few months based on information coming out of the county And that leaves us with the recommended action That's part of our board letter in process to receive and file this all of our information provide direction in regard to the CEO's recommended budget and Approve the new budget development policy on the disaster recovery reserve And provide any direction regarding special issues or other items and determine pursuant to CEQA guidelines that actions are not subject to CEQUA Madam chair that concludes my comments and we're happy to Answer any questions or move into deliberation.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:40:40

So does any board member have a question for miss Anderson? And well, I just really appreciate it shows how carefully you were listening as we were talking up here so what I heard from your comments is what I also heard that that is there are some things it seems we have general agreement on and already. And I wonder if we could discuss those first and then move on to maybe what some of our personal priorities might be, but I think for the veterans at least one FTE ongoing is that?

4:41 – 4:4934 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:41:20

Yeah, I'd like staff to come back and let us know where You know, I obviously the request is I believe for three.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:41:29

Yes.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:41:29

So I don't want to say I just want to do one. I want to look at where How would that person? Where would that person be stationed? Where do we need if there were three? Where would they all be at? Obviously 3 is a wish list. I want to do as many as we can do but to me that's something I think we all agree Veteran Services offices need to be beefed up. We just got to figure out how much of that we can do between now and June.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:41:57

Yes, and I do believe we asked could we phase this over time but I think what you're saying is really how would it be allocated? But at least one ongoing in general agreement to that. Let's see and the REACH study and at that level kind Okay. This is a bigger ticket item, but in long-range planning we have two choices it seems to me and we can do this one time with the planner and the consultant that seemed the least...

people seem to agree to that one?

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:42:42

Yep. I'd love option two, but I think we need to do option one because we don't have much money

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:42:48

right supervisor Nelson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:42:49

Yeah, um I'm not there on either one at this point. I know that we need to do something I Don't know throwing more money out it is the solution. I think that's a puzzle that I'm looking forward to the hearing they were gonna have on that in the near future to how that discussed So I'm not ready to be supportive of either option at this point, but I understand Why my colleagues are?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:43:10

So I'd like to get a sense, Supervisor Hart where are you on that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:43:16

Yeah. I think the consultant approach is the preferable.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:43:22

So I think we had five on the first and the second, and we've got four for the planner. So that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:43:31

it. Chairman if you would, and if we were voting, I wouldn't be voting against it. I'm just more abstaining at this point. I want to have a discussion among all of us. But it's not quite there yet so thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:43:46

And then the other thing that I heard, I thought I heard a lot of agreement on was the TOT audit. That that might pay for itself in the money that it would generate or find. Did I hear that? I see a nod. Nod.

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:44:03

For

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:44:03

one time.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:44:04

One time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:44:05

Okay, one time. Yeah, one time I heard a couple different things. I heard a position with an audit, but I also heard there was maybe some software that we could at least enhance what they had with. So I would like to see that come back between now and June so we know what that looks like. If it's only a $30,000 software purchase then that's obviously preferable although as we said Mr. Hagen is doing a lot and he's sometimes a victim of his own success so it might be good to vet that out a little bit more

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:44:39

I'm interested in an audit. I just on my unless I have an older sheet, it shows it in ongoing and I don't know how you would do it as a one-time so and there's so much limit. It's so little ongoing that almost takes up the entire ongoing budget. So I am very interested The procedure of doing it, but I don't know how we're going to

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:45:05

pay. Right? I was thinking of it somehow and have to be one time because I think

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:45:10

almost everything we're gonna have to do is is one time even if it's stuff that wouldn't ideally be one time but maybe we could just I'm okay with him coming back and explaining what exactly this is gonna be used for sometime between now in June. That's fine

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:45:26

Supervisor Hart well, I think the premise is that the The new position is efficient enough to generate revenue ongoing To offset the cost.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:45:36

That's right. Thank you. That was the logic

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:45:39

yeah, yep But but we would have to allocate it now out of ongoing right I mean unless Don't

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:45:52

have to I

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:45:54

know well That's what I was asking earlier is like could you take? 600,000 and say hey over three years after three years this has to pay for itself or we're not going to do it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:01

anymore Summarize your lamina through the chair. This is one You know we are gonna be working with the department starting next week. I think There are some options here. I think if we have general direction that you're supportive of the position we will Incorporate in a way that'll be Supported ongoing

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:46:23

So, so we've got four now the other one I think I may have heard general agreement on is is the EV positions EEV the transportation planning position

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:46:37

For I think at least four of us voted for a lot a week ago. So hopefully that isn't ephemeral but III would say that Just as we're unsure about the future on a lot of these positions, that it would be acceptable to fund it for one time and see if either things get better between now and next year or if we can get grant funding to continue it or some other method of continuing the effort.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:47:10

So, a lot of lights here. I think Supervisor Hart you were first? It was a leftover light. Okay and Supervisor Williams you've had your say.

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:47:19

Yeah, I just want us to call the question if we didn't actually all support the plan last week then maybe we should revise the plan but I think we voted for it.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:47:30

Supervisor Nelson and then Labanino.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:47:33

Yes, thank you Chairman. I supported moving forward with the discussion. I think it sounds like a worthwhile expenditure. I'm just not sure if some of the other requests don't rank higher on my list than that so you know if we had unlimited money I would absolutely be there but when we talked about that last week we didn't have everything in front of us yet so I would reserve my support for that until I've seen what other expansions

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:48:03

Supervisor Lovenino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:48:04

Thank you, I probably opened this can of worms but talking about using one time for ongoing. I don't think you can do it for one year now. I support this like but I think you have to carve out a chunk of money. You can't just say $165,000 because it's one time for one year. To me if we're going to go down the slippery slope then I'm looking at like you should fund something for three years at least And carve that money out of the budget so that next year we're not all just sitting here with 25 different positions that we funded for one year that we have to get rid of. Now this one's different because we are going to be pursuing grant funding, so I'm a little bit more comfortable with it and it does state in the notes that the department thinks they can get the grant funding.

Right. So I would be cool with moving it forward for one year provided that there's grant funding. If we don't get a grant funding comes back and we have to make a decision on it but

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:49:00

So then I think we have at least four that there's some general agreement there. The other one that I think I heard agreement on but I'm not as sure is the human trafficking one time, the thought is could this be one time given that it's now on a grant? Supervisor Lavinino asked why this wasn't service level reduction so...

4:49 – 4:5519 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:49:29

Question about this and I think it's more of a legal question is because had this issue before it is We can't really dictate line items in the sheriff's budget if I'm correct so like I might say, I'd really love to have a Human trafficking detective or I want to support the narcotics detective but not school resource At the end of the day anything we approve for the sheriff budget. Is the Sheriff's prerogative that if he feels it should go to a different area That's great. And he might say today that yes, I would really love to have that human sex trafficking detective but three weeks from now if something pops up and he has to move the money so it's not like other departments where we just kind of dictate that this is what it's for having said that I do support continuing that with the caveat that we continue to pursue other outside.

I can't imagine that there's not grant opportunities for something that such a scourge On our community so you know, but I just want to clarify that. I've kind of made that mistake before where we kind of think we're line item approving items and it's not really the case.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:50:38

Supervisor Lavinia through the chair. So you're right you appropriate funds to the sheriff's budget But I have to say this sheriff has been very good I think when you're designating a purpose and if there's an agreement, I don't think it I can't remember time of the sheriff didn't use it for that purpose

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:50:53

And I want to be really clear that I wasn't saying he hasn't done that. I'm just saying

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:50:58

That

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:51:01

I just want to be clear that We have to realize that there is illegal And I think that's the difference between this department and other departments.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:51:08

Yeah, and if I could just add something Supervisor Levin you know through the chair to the other thing is that The likelihood of us finding additional grant funding for this position is probably slim and none and the reality is You know The whole idea of the grants is that they give us the grants as seed money to get something started with the idea That well the jurisdiction will then pick it up on their own if it's considered to be worthwhile and so forth So with so many other Demands and so many other priorities that are out there at the national level.

This is in competition with a lot of other things, and so it's unlikely I would think that we're going to find something that would substitute as a grant. So—and again, I just would reiterate that you know, you're right. The authority is there for me if the sky falls and there's some disaster. To use what we have in the best way possible. But the reality is, you know, we're making a pledge to you that we feel this is a very important position and we will support it just as we have done with the IV community resource deputies and others where you've earmarked certain monies for certain positions. And I, we understand that even though perhaps not legally obligated, we are certainly conducive to doing so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:52:20

And that's great to hear. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:52:22

Supervisor Nelson,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:52:23

yes chair Herman actually have a question about this. So this this position is about it's part of bigger task force, right? so Brown

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:52:31

would you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:52:32

do sorry sheriff?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:52:37

I don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:52:39

My question was this position is part of a bigger task force that exists and without this position that task force Begins to unravel to certain extent

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:52:47

well without this position there is no Enforcement element. There's no investigative and enforcement element in that task force some of the services would still be there I'm sure but we wouldn't have the specialized investigative position that we do now That really is the entry point for people that are To get them out of the human trafficking scourge and to get them into recovery programs and options to help them Thank you, Sheriff. And I think that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:53:18

just highlights the importance of funding this position. It really is so much more than just one detective.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:53:26

Excellent. Thank you for asking that question. So that's kind of my list and CEO Miyasato, you've recorded all of that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:53:40

We have supervisors and we are waiting for any other direction but we can recap once you've had more discussion.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:53:46

Okay. So, Supervisor Williams?

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:53:50

Well if the Climate Action Plan is as we passed it last week is still where we want to go there's one other item that you know we did vote for the light duties mandate and the price tag is a little bit higher than I was expecting so you know I understand Somebody had cold feet, but I think we do this. It's a one-time expenditure and the plan by the department as I understand it is to do a large number of chargers in the electrical infrastructure for this.

They didn't want to give me an estimate but they did. 120 to 130 chargers over the lifespan of the project And that would be a significant step forward to equipping our fleet to be able to do this and our institution to lead the way. And it would also help county employees buy electric cars because there will be more charging infrastructure at work. So I hope there still is support for this moving forward, so I'd like to hear about that.

4:55 – 5:0121 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:55:11

Any response?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:55:15

Yeah, I voted for it and I will continue to support that. It's a one-time expenditure and we can't continue to tout that we're going to change our fleet over to EVs and not have anywhere for anybody to charge them so.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:55:30

And Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:55:31

Yes, thank you Chair Herman. My hesitation as I was gonna reiterate isn't because in opposition to the concept but do think we should be the leader in this. I'm just concerned that we are I'm supportive in concept, but I do think I have some higher priorities that I'll probably be supporting that may make it difficult for me if I had to reorder my list.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:56:01

Supervisor Hoyt.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:56:02

Yeah, I'm supportive as well and I wish we'd had more success in buying more electric vehicles sooner I know there's a backlog and manufacturing them But I think that we're gonna find that we're gonna have cost savings in the operations and maintenance of those vehicles once we get at the fleet Tipping point because I drive an electric car and I have not spent $1 on maintenance in the past year on my car so

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:56:24

So I think we have four and maybe five in the future. So where next?

CommentTOT It'sProposed4:56:38

I guess you know, I don't know where the board wants to go We could chew on a lot of things for June or we could try to start going through You know item by item. I Don't know What is the best? But I'm willing to do either way

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:56:58

Supervisor Lavinia and then heart

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:57:01

Thank you. I, you know, I think one of the for me the biggest item that came before us that we have to discuss is staffing at the sheriff's level and so I don't know if we want to go at that now or but because I think that's That's a discussion that we need to have so You know, and I don' know how we kick that off and I'll just throw something out, too. So another thing that I wanted to discuss was looking at the cannabis revenue and it has been up, it's been down.

And I think it's time that we've looked... If you look at the cannabis tax right now, it is paying for... Shoot! I had a list You know, it's $2.5 million going into the maintenance fund for the 18%. It is providing the increase for those folks that do in-home health supportive services. It's providing almost $800,000 in library funding, $3.5 million to the co-response program, homeless operating costs, the Voter Choice Act or translation services. It's being used as kind of a catchall which is what it should be.

But when we analyze this a little bit more, we're finding out that while the good actors are paying their fair share, our system that we set up might be a little bit porous for those that find a way to manipulate the system. And so what I would like to do is direct staff with your approval to return us with options on ways that we might tighten up the tax structure And that direction would be to the CEO's office, treasurer tax collector and our cannabis team.

Because of the fact any change that we would need to do to the taxation would have to be placed on the ballot which is November. We are under a shot clock right now and that would have to come back to us sooner rather than later so I've been talking to the CEO's office about it in all transparency but I don't want to try to direct from a singular position so I'm coming to you as Colleagues to see if this is something you're interested in.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:59:23

Well, I know you've raised it on the board before and would you elaborate just a little bit more on how we tax it now and what you think would be better and why?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:59:37

Laundry list of ways that we tax all different kinds of percentages and...

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.804:59:41

Cultivation, primarily.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.884:59:42

Cultivation. You know, the grand jury report asked for a square foot tax. What I'm kind of looking for is for staff to bring to us. I don't want to tell you—I don't want to be the one saying this is the way we should tax it. I think we have staff go make some determinations on what other jurisdictions do, kind of look at the grand jury report And even, you know discuss it with industry

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:00:10

and

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:00:11

the treasurer absolutely make sure the treasure is involved and find a way that is still fair for those that are doing what they're supposed to be doing. But it closes the loopholes on those that aren't.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:00:23

And let me just ask our CEO, do we have time? I mean we had a study done initially before we made the decision. I suppose we can go back to that but how much more could you could you just comment on this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:00:37

Supervisors, as Supervisor Lavagnino said. So to make it for the November ballot we have to get everything to the Elections Department before the boards break in July mid-July so what we did last time was about this time We had a discussion in May to the board with different options and we could provide different options to the board based on Supervisor Lavinia said looking what other jurisdictions do going back to the grand jury looking why we suggested what we did originally And then the board would have to pass ordinances in June and July to make that deadline, but we we can come back It might be some special meetings involved because we have long meetings Working with County Council as well as a treasure tax collector with options in May

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:01:20

sure and the big question is Would it generate more revenue or make this system fairer? I think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:01:27

it's the issue of certainty. As you saw, we overestimated revenues by almost 30% this year and so we don't want to be in a position having that much volatility in our projections.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:01:41

Excellent thank you. Supervisor Williams?

5:01 – 5:1013 turns

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:01:48

I think it's good that you're bringing it up. The certainty of doing a square foot tax though is exactly what put us in the mess we're in right now. at a statewide level because the state tax is assessed in that manner. It doesn't go up or down with the value of the crop so it means that somebody's taxation, one local operation's taxation level is at 80% right now because the market price is so low. So of course somebody whose taxation level is at 80%, You know, probably is tempted to go put some go to do things not so according to the law. So that's that's the problem. So I guess I would would wonder that certainty is somewhat at war with the flexibility of your answer.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:02:45

You know I have your answer so we've looked at this a lot of different ways

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:02:48

Yes, and I'm not saying we can't look at it But we don't want to set up the system. We don't want to replicate the system that the state did that fail

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:02:56

absolutely it's That's horrible there are a bunch of different ways with a sliding scale or a floor with keeping the 4% There's a bunch of different options that are out there that would provide us Certainty that everybody's paying something And this is not a way honestly to try to increase the revenue because I think what it is, is trying to figure out the people that are following the rules.

Whatever transaction that we would do is not an increase to their tax but for those that are working through the system way to close those loopholes there are a few systems out there they're very complicated I don't think I want to get into them right now and I'm very complicated but It would complicate the budget hearing, but I think they can be brought back from staff after they look through them and analyze them and determine which one works best for us. But I promise you there's no intention to replicate a state system trying to keep it as simple as possible by instituting some sort of a floor for those that are just not paying anything so.

There's options

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:04:03

supervisor

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:04:04

Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:04:05

Well, I think the biggest challenge with anything that has to go to the voters directly on the ballot is getting a consensus amongst the stakeholders so that there is A clear message to communicate to the voters and at times tight so it's going to be challenging to get everybody On the same page, but you know this place to start is with a conversation and to see what the reactions are And see if there can find be some common ground. There might be a way to put pull together things that Different interest groups are interested in seeing in one package

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:04:36

Supervisor Nielsen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:04:37

Thank you, Chair Hartman. I'm interested in moving forward with bringing back something. I think the conversation has worked well. I am interested in a system that's a little bit more transparent than what we have right now. That's what I hear from community members is that they're suspicious of the industry Because they don't really quite understand the business of cannabis. And so I think whether if it's a square foot or something that's a lot more transparent for the public, so that they really can connect the impact to the revenue that's created would be helpful. I'd rather us not have to spend half million dollars a year You know hiring a third party compliance company to walk us through this I mean, you know I supported that because I think just like supporting an audit in the TOT It's gonna bring in more revenue But I wish we wouldn't have to go down that route and so if we can set up a tax structure because you know again We've learned a lot about this cannabis Endeavor throughout the process just with our land use.

I think we've learned small things also with the taxing Of it as well, and I think it should it would be a good conversation for this board to have

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:05:42

Supervisor Williams,

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:05:43

I think that brings up that we should as part of the discussion Have an assessment from staff if we're really getting our money's worth out of the million bucks or not You know I don't know if it's possible to have that assessment this early but but you know it I was excited that they revised their rate structure downwards for us, but I don't know whether we're really catching people through this or not.

So I guess that would be sort of the main question I have is through our three different ways of verification, the treasure tax collector This way, and the sheriff's enforcement team. Are we actually fine catching people? And if we're not catching people that's gotta mean not that everybody is innocent. Right, it means that our systems aren't doing what they're supposed to do.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:06:46

If I remember correctly it was the failure of the state track and trace system which made us have to ante up and I think this may be a necessary piece and unrelated to how we tax but I think I hear agreement that we're willing to Direct staff as part of our final motion to look at this bring this back and And see what you can tell us in terms of fairness certainty, and I'm interested if it brought in more revenue Okay Supervisor Lavinino you suggested mm-hmm

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:07:26

Yeah, I suggested we kind of kick around the funding. I haven't talked to anybody else about it so just kind of curious. I know there was a couple BIFs, Board Inquiry Forms about that and let me just say in general I really like that we can do anything but we can't do everything If you had thought like four years ago if we would have come in this room and we said hey, if we had 272 more employees will be pretty much. We're going to cover everything right well That's what we did over four years. We've increased the staff by 272 and Then we still need if you look at our sheets. We need 52 more people in the county to meet all of the demand And so when I was analyzing that, and of course the first thing I think of is government's just getting too big.

But when you start looking at the things that we do in analyzing this sectum it's because the further we get into these problems for example co-response is you start realizing okay here's a program that actually saves the taxpayer money. It's effective but it costs a lot of money and it requires more investment. It's just difficult that all those things that we see and hear. I don't think there's one it's on the list that I'm not a fan of they're all worthy but then I start thinking about it too, and I'm like okay here's a department with 3 or 400 people in it and And I've been through these budgets so many times. It's like if I don' have this one position you know everything is going to fail. I'm like well How's that possible man? We can't be working on that thin of a margin So You know, fourth consecutive year of no service level reductions which is amazing.

And really the biggest item for me that somehow we've got to tackle is we've got to address one way or the other kind of I guess figure out are we underfunded in the custody deputy positions? Are we understaffed or are we funding at the right level and we're not staff to the right level? I think we got to have that discussion because it's kind of sitting out there and You know, and I think something is funny that we're gonna have this conversation right now because Yesterday I guess was the first day that we actually took we booked people at the North County Jail Which is a huge monumental difference for Santa Maria and Lompoc.

I don't think it's any coincidence that we've seen crime rates in Escalate as we waited for that jail to get built as we've had Officers from Santa Maria and Lompoc have to become basically high-priced taxi drivers driving down to South County So I'm very excited about that, but I want to see these things run efficiently It is costing us a lot of money, but it's money. That's well spent But I need to find That golden zone of having the right amount of people there still keeping our deputies safe But at the same time when I look at the numbers, I'm like it seems like we're funding it and it's not staffed So I've got we've got to figure this out

5:10 – 5:1610 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:10:43

Supervisor Williams. Did you have a comment on this point?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:10:47

You know, I think that The The time that I've been here when we fund new positions, it doesn't necessarily change the amount of people that are hired. The most successful thing in the time that I've been here in increasing the hires occurred when Barney and the Sheriff brought the overhire project to us so as much The grid of all these things, and I'd love to have my Montecito guy or gal. And I definitely want the narcotics team back.

But that to me if we just fund the position what's likelihood is that'll get cannibalized from somebody else because we're not actually hiring enough where if we go with the overhire strategy I think that will work, you know. Bob's Biff was about the Prop 172 reserves. We could use and you know we could reserve a piece of the 172 reserves for overhires which is what worked before, was that three years ago? And caused OT to drop for the first time in some time And to access that money, the sheriff has to fill some of those 39 positions and then we fund more. If he hires some, then we fund more.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:12:35

Supervisor Nelson. Supervisor Lavinino did you have a direct response? Well

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:12:40

yeah. So that's kind of what I've had in my mind of a... You know it's hard for me to say I want to fund more positions when we have open positions. We historically had open positions and then I hear the argument, well it's hard to recruit so we can't fill those positions but I'm struggling with how do we get the other ones? So it is a conundrum, but I was thinking if there's some reward system almost for if there's 20 hired you do have over-hire authority for another five. If there's 30 hired it goes to seven or eight. I'm not sure 172's the place. It looks like the money's available but I questioned about that earlier and think that might be a little bit of a problem too so anyway, I do like that Principal, it helped in patrol and I think it could help in custody.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:13:34

Supervisor Nelson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:13:35

Yeah, I was just going to you know DOS conduct words out of my mouth that I was going down that same same route You know we need to get those positions filled. I think that was a successful strategy in the past I know that Saul and Barney working with the sheriff have brought that a long way recently had some Retirements that set them back and but this is an opportunity And so um I think what I'm hoping that we're gonna do today is show that their support when those positions are filled for this board to add positions

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:14:05

Supervisor Hart

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:14:06

well, I think this discussion is really helpful. I think this is exactly what we need to be doing is coming up with a strategic plan that Gets the positions filled that's I think there's a consensus about that and you know after that We'll see when we get to that place. I'm not sure we have to go all the way down that road until we have a concrete plan as to how to get those positions filled, and similarly in the conversation about the court backlog with the district attorney and the public defender, I'd like to see a strategic plan on how we're going to actually address those cases. You know, we're talking about adding people, and that's probably the solution that's needed, but I'd like to see something in concrete About, well what is that gonna mean?

How are these people gonna reduce those cases and how are we gonna get this backlog addressed over a time period. And I know we have Judge Ellsworth on contract. I think she'd be in a great position to help mediate that and come up with something specific so that when we do adopt the budget, you know, we have some confidence over the next three years that we're gonna actually achieve what we're hoping we're going to achieve with this extra

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:15:08

folks. Supervisor Williams.

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:15:13

Well, I think your point Supervisor Hart is excellent. Maybe the best way to do it is to say to Mona and her staff we'd like the overhire strategy to be brought back to the fore I think it's important to bring back a recommendation to you know as part of the June budget. Whether that's a segment of the 172 reserves or unfortunately, I would not be as psyched about another source but if that's what it ends up being Back to the fore.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:16 – 5:2212 turns

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:16:17

They're on basically 12 of 14 days working 12 hour shifts. And that's how we're going to, we're not going to fix the problem of getting more people when more people are gonna want to leave. So I think just a message from us that yes, we understand that, we value it because it's not just unsustainable. It's not just gonna create burnout. It is actually dangerous you know so we've got to fix that problem but I think the first step in fixing that problem is hiring the open positions that we have right now

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:16:49

Supervisor Nelson, no. So I think there's general consensus here. CEO Miyasato did you want to add anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:17:03

No, I was just waiting if you wanted us to summarize what we heard or if there's more to be added.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:17:09

I wanted to add something about the sheriff's budget on the narcotics team. I really think the opioid task force group that the sheriff has brought together is revealing how difficult this problem is and how many different types of people have to work together, but there really does need to be a law enforcement piece. I was distressed to hear though from the sheriff that the other jurisdictions that are facing these same problems aren't stepping up And for me, that's I mean it's affecting all of us. And so I'm eager for the county to step up but only if others step up as well. So just wanted to get that out on the record. Supervisor Nelson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:18:06

Yeah and I wanted to second that you know. This is a problem that spans jurisdictions, and it really is going to take an approach from our local law enforcement officers, our city police, and our county sheriff to work together as a team to address this. And one of the things I was interested in looking at the narcotics unit was I want to see a multi-jurisdictional narcotics unit specifically addressing opioid and fentanyl issues in our community.

is a huge concern and definitely in need. And I want to do what I can in this budget to provide the seed money or the encouragement to make that happen.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:18:47

Okay, well so I think we've got a fair number of things that we've got agreement on and I don't think we need yet to have that come back to us but Supervisor Lavanito?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:19:03

Well, I would like CEO

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:05

Miyasato. Supervisor, so if there's agreement, I would like to repeat that because we need clear direction about what we're going to include in the recommended budget. Okay, yes. So I would need a motion. You're directing me to put it in the recommended budget?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:19:19

Okay, but we're not done yet. Mean we're not done yet with what you might want to put in your recommended budget But we are done with the things. We think we have five or four correct,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:19:31

but on the sheriff's site you want more direction

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:34

I'd like to repeat what I heard and then you could add that so and Nancy and Paul and Jeff can Yeah, good luck Mona So this is what I heard that there could be a motion from the board if The things that you're looking at regarding the expansion requests and one is so there's some their support for the board to add at least one veterans services officer which is a hundred and eight thousand dollars, and we would continue to work with the Treasury tax collector on What else could be done? And where those what's the need could they be phased in etc but you would at least like one to come out of the ongoing revenue and $100,000 of one time for the REACH project on the waterfront project.

For the P&D you'd like us to go ahead and put in a recommended budget option 1 which is using consultants. For the TOT audit we are going to work with the auditor's office but we understand your intent of funding a position. For the EV position from CSD you'd like that funded The department has agreed for one year because they believe there's grant funding that can carry it beyond that Also for EV infrastructure the $400,000 one time that General Services has Suggested as a cost as a first stage and getting all the EV instruct Infrastructure done You'd like us so that was on the expansions request. We heard there is interest in In the human trafficking position, but we can see what else can be done. There's not enough ongoing revenue for that and the sheriff had said he doesn't think there's more grant funding, but we could bring back some recommendations to you But it sounds like there's interest in the board and funding that to some degree Options to come back to look at you've wanted us to come back to look at the cannabis tax structure You said you want something that's interest fairness consistency of revenue ensuring those who aren't paying Will be paying under new structure will bring back options to your board At the time you also won an assessment and how we are on the JPA the consortium that we're paying into On the sheriff, you said you'd like us to bring back an evaluation of the overhire strategy and bring something back to the board for the June hearings.

Also, you said there is support, Supervisor Nelson, you said there's support in some form, not sure what that support is but for their narcotics team if other jurisdictions also agree to support that. And you asked first what's a plan to reduce the backlog in the public defender and district attorney's office if this funding is provided? That is all that I heard and I'm wondering if my staff is nodding.

So that's what, if you were going to make a motion for us to include those, to come back with items and to include those other items in the recommended budget we could do that and defer other discussions to hearings. We would also like though some direction on the ARPA money because there are some things we would like funded in that so we'd like your direction on that as well today.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:22:54

So we made some recommendations and Nancy put up on the slide a couple.

not transcribed≈6s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:23 – 5:269 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:23:12

Chair Hartman and members of the board, so there's two items that or staff recommended to you today regarding ARPA one was on the remaining allocation of the public safety radio network So that's a discretionary portion. This is seventeen point six million dollars that would go towards that project It'd be helpful if you're in concurrence with that The other items were on the restricted bucket.

We had $20.7 million and provided you the detail on that allocation as well.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:23:47

And I guess what's a little confusing to me is because the backlog, is this the same backlog that we're talking about for the DA and the public defender?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:23:59

So the backlog would give the board additional one-time funding for the current year. That was part of the slide so those are The 5.9 though are things that are already in the budget It's just allowing you to have flexibility with some discretionary funds as we backfill them over three years But what does have the court backlog? Positions for the district attorney and public defender as those expansion requests, so it would be helpful if if this is going to be What your board wants to move forward

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:24:32

CEO Miyasato

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:24:35

So this is our recommendations and on the backlog issue that D.A. Dudley talked about and then Lamar talked about, so another option is if you wanted to fund them at the same level it's the same dollar amount and you would have excess money available in yellow for HVAC projects I think So that's an option for your board. The Public Defender's Office has spoken about the need for more staff, even though it's not in parity with the District Attorney's office but we're giving you those two options.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:25:15

Supervisor Williams?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:25:17

I'd rather us direct adding the money to equalize the positions rather than take it away from HVAC projects that have a, particularly the ones that have a 10-12 year payback period. Ironically one of those projects is in the Sheriff's Department and could reduce their ongoing expenses so I think we should. Keep the money in and if we have to add it to equalize it, then we have to add it to equalize it

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:25:52

So what I'm wondering is if we could if we might want to take ARPA and take a motion or And get that out of the way and then focus on Supervisor Lavinia.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:26:03

Thank you madam chair. I'll move that we take the The discretionary and follow staff's recommendation move it to public safety radio network And then I would go with slide two of the proposed remaining restricted funding recommendation, revised option. Which is the one that's up for ARPA

5:26 – 5:3441 turns

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:26:24

funding.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:26:28

Supervisor Williams?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:26:29

I'd make a substitute motion that we do this plus keep the HVAC money. Was it $900,000 before? This is

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:26:40

additional

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:26:41

money for HVAC. The HVAC number went down as this one went up, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:26:49

Supervisor Williams through the Chair, this is just allowing us to take a portion of what we're not going to spend on the backlog to Public Defender and I'm we're just shifting it to HVAC projects if that's what your board would

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:27:02

prefer.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:27:06

All in favor say aye. Aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:27:09

Sorry, I'm not sure which slide we're voting on.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:27:12

Sorry so I'll take it back and we'll have more discussion because I didn't give you an option sorry I didn't see the light.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:27:18

No I just want to make sure this is a slide that Supervisor Lavinio? Okay yes

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:27:23

any further discussion All in favor say aye. Any opposed? We've got an action item completed today after three

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:27:36

days.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:27:39

So I think we've done a fair bit in terms of where we have general agreement I think it might be helpful. I know each of us has pet projects, projects we really care about and it might be nice to get those on the table. Supervisor Lovenino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:28:02

Thank you. Well, I'm just curious if the North County youth that didn't make it into Or is it? I didn't hear it. So did that mean you didn't hear 3 votes for it or?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:28:19

That is correct,

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:28:20

OK well. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. You still

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:28:25

have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:28:25

time.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:28:28

And what I'd like to say is, I know that 50,000 is in the South but I think 50,00 probably isn't enough for both Santa Maria and Lompoc where the problems are really much more serious so I would love to see that number increase.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:28:44

I agree. I think we have the ability to do more in this area You know, even if even if it's a one-time funding and we chase grants those types of things but we have to we have to do we have to at least match South County. I think it should be a South County mid County North County item because I've got Santa Maria and Guadalupe you've got Lompoc get San Diego Valley Los Alamos everywhere. We're going to do a lot of things in I think we have I hope we have enough votes to at least match what happens in the South County.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:29:23

CEO Miyasato?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:29:25

In that case, Supervisors, I'd suggest then since I don't think you have enough ongoing funding so it could be $50,000 each and maybe for two years because I think it takes that while as Supervisor Lavinia saw just to get something going. So $200,000 over a two-year period of time.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:29:46

Supervisor Williams?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:29:48

I think that's really an investment that will is important for everyone's public safety and for the kids future so absolutely. So you're so we had 200,000 allocation I would agree to that.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:30:04

And Supervisor Hart?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:30:05

And I agree too.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:30:06

And Supervisor Nelson?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:30:08

Yes.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:30:08

Okay, so we've got another thing that we can add to our list of agreement Across the board

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:30:16

to make sure we're not short change in the South County now so what is there. I don't mean to be looking out for them but it's 50 so that's a 100% North County, a 100 from we all

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:30:26

represent the whole county

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:30:27

right. Yeah, I just want to make sure they're not as the as the

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:30:30

ongoing amount

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:30:31

this what is the ongoing okay just songs were always.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:30:37

Okay. So that's all agreement. So again, is it worth talking about other projects that we're really passionate about? Supervisor Nielsen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:30:50

Yes. Thank you, Chair Hartman. You know last year during the budget cycle when things were a lot more cheerful with some of the revenue available, seeing that we knew ARPA was coming and we were still looking at cannabis and we hadn't gotten some of the bad news that revenues would be going down. There was a project that my office had been working really hard on moving forward which is the Orchid Library. You know, the need to have Orchid Library has been well documented at this point but again it's one of the only two libraries in the county that we actually lease facilities. It's undersized for such a large population that Orchids has and there is a lot of money out there for libraries right now but for us to get that going in Orchard we need to be able to have some seed money and luckily Unfortunately, in ORCiT through philanthropic support we already got $2.1 million from local donors and we have another almost 900,000 from AB1600 So we're already at $3 million.

It's going to be a big project that we're going to need federal and state appropriations, maybe financing through debt in the future but we have to get a facility to be eligible for those things. We've already potentially lost a $5 million grant because we didn't have a site selected already and we weren't prepared for that. I was disappointed by that but I'm also just renewed that I need to keep fighting for that.

We do need a property acquisition to move that project forward. I know I had originally asked for a $2 million match to what we've done in the community. I know that's a hard lift in this budget, and so my ask is for as little as necessary but as much as possible to accomplish that. What I would ask for some support is that we make maybe some kind of minimal amount and work with staff to find different revenue sources.

This is all money that's going to be leveraged for additional funds at different levels of government, I'm not sure what, you know, I know that we have $6 million at one time and I don't believe that we should be taking a third of that just to push into one project. That's quite inappropriate but I do need kind of board support in moving this along. This is listed as one of our five projects for federal appropriation this year. I'm hoping to maybe get letters from all of you as well to push that along so our office is working pretty hard at it. I think we do need some journal fund support for the project And so I'm just throwing

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:33:22

ballpark amount what is his

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:33:25

Well, I think it's going to be multiple years that I'm coming to you with this project at this point. We've got to chunk this away. Even $500,000 this year would start to move me along. I know that we hopefully that would be matched with some federal appropriation and maybe state appropriations and maybe we could get the acquisition out of the way but I may be coming back to you as we move this project forward but I think at least getting some general fund into the project would hopefully attract additional dollars.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:33:53

And serving on the library ad hoc, Guadalupe and Orchid not to have a library building. So I'm supportive of doing everything we can to get it started. Supervisor Hart?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:34:09

Yeah, I'm supportive as well too. Supervisor Nelson took me out to the Orca community and showed me one of the potential sites and it's absolutely inspiring. You walk down the street and you say isn't that the library right there? And then you learn no, it's around the corner in a little rented space and it's a great project and I'm strongly supportive of it and hope that we can put some money into it

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:34 – 5:4322 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:34:38

Supervisor Lavinino, your PEP project?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:34:42

I have none. I'm good.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:34:47

Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:34:49

Well I mentioned it earlier in the budget workshops the Modok multi-use multipurpose path you know is a great return on investment. I was thinking that you know in terms of the HVAC return on investments of 10 to 12 years which is great this project delivers seven million dollars from one billion dollar investment So I think we have to really look. This is a classic situation where we've got grant funds, can't deliver the project without the local match and I think we need some amount of money to keep that project doesn't necessarily have to be the full amount in one bite but we need to chip away at this so that when the money's there it's available to be built.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:35:23

Would $500,000 do it? That would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:35:25

be

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:35:26

great.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:35:27

Supervisor Williams

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:35:29

So there's parts of Mission Canyon that are not served by the city's sewer system. They say we've got to pay for the hookup, you know sort of up front this is on the expansion request from Public Works and it's you know I had a quote that I found the other day, you know. What good is an empire that can rule the waves but can't flush its toilets? Winston Churchill in 1903, I believe.

So that's, I guess my quote for the day for that project.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:36:17

And for me, it would be the Refugio right-of-way. It could be $400,000 to get it finished or $200,000 for one year but again we're working with Bucket Brigade and the community and this is kids can't get to school there's been a death and so we really need to make that safer so that's my top priority Have we left anything out that we need to discuss further?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:36:53

Yes,

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:36:54

Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:36:54

Nielsen. Chair Hartman if you will one other project that I wanted to my other pet project Is and I don't want to call it the Orchid Community Resource Deputy because it's a North County Community Resource Deputy You know when we have that discussion ask questions about Where the other community resource deputies are in our community our county The North County is a glaring hole, you know Isla Vista As one and they have a lot of needs. I totally agree with that, but you know when you include all the areas of the unincorporated North County that aren't served by a community resource deputy right now it's five times the size of Isla Vista and I just think that is a really important asset for those unincorporated areas. We created these unincorporated areas, we've got to make sure that we do what we can to provide quality of life and this is really the connection between law enforcement and its residents.

These things can have a great return on investment because it really gets people working together to address crime. And at the end of the day when we do have this issue of not enough deputies, especially in North County. It gets one more person on patrol or potentially on patrol to address any potential issues that would be happening and so that's also something I really would like to ask for some support for if the board was willing.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:38:15

Supervisor Lovenino?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:38:18

Well I wasn't going to comment on that. So I'm gonna leave that one out there because again that's one that I would like to see funded but kind of figure out where it comes in June. I want to talk about, you know, Darryl Sheck came and spoke and I think we have to address that as well that I just want I want our employees tonight. I think I'm speaking for everybody here that, you know, we appreciate all the work that all 4452 of them do. And I, you know, it's weird that we come in here and we talk about 10 positions or 15 positions And we have all these people doing amazing work of things that board priorities that people have done in the past. So I didn't want that to go unaddressed with Daryl, that you know we're all thinking about everybody right now is struggling with inflation where whether your county employer or not department head or an AOP you got to fill up your gas.

You know obviously it affects somebody on the lower end more but it still is a shock to everybody so One thing I wanted to point out in this budget as well is that pension costs stayed flat, you know for the first time in a long time. And if you want to put on some rose colored glasses which I like to do 2028 there's a study and I'll bring it in June Chiron looks at our Pension forecast and you know we're paying off a huge unfunded liability, which is board made a decision years ago to Basically take that 15 years and close it off and pay off that unfunded liability And it always seemed like it was so far in the future that that would happen Right now. It's scheduled for 2028, you know, and which still seems like a long ways away But it's not it's around the corner So it's gonna start coming into our five-year forecast pretty soon And just to kind of give you an idea of, I mean it drops off the table.

Now this is granted if we continue to hit a 7% return which this year's going to be a heavy lift but if we average 7% over the next six or seven years We're nine years into this payoff already. You're talking about a 50 60 million dollar Windfall to the county so that we wouldn't have to continue to put in to pay off that unfunded liability So it could dramatically change right as I leave office The fiscal outlook for the entire county and we'd all be sitting around here talking about how much money you know can go to each and every specific project, so I just wanted to throw that out there as well but We are thinking about our employees and it is great that we've had a relatively mild, I would have to say calm period of relations. And I'm glad we signed all of our contracts and everything seems to be peaceful right now but we are thinking about them.

We understand that this is a hard time for everybody right now

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:41:26

Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:41:27

I just want to thank supervisor Lavinia for his service on the retirement board because our returns have been doing really

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:41:33

well since you joined

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.885:41:35

Well, I must taken a vacation this year so it's not looking as good this year But you know we still have a few months left, but yeah We will rest on that 25% return of course we told our consultants the same thing like hey all you gotta do is Do this again next year? We're gonna be fine, so

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:41:51

I think it was 2030 so it's come down two years in a year. Yeah, that's amazing Well rose-colored tie So, I think that brings us to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:42:06

Supervisors if I could recap the list I read earlier It's what we your I would need a motion that you're directing us to put that and recommend budget In addition you also mentioned that 200,000 one time To span two years for Lompoc and Santa Maria for some kind of youth initiatives. You've also told us you have an interest, and we'll look at the available revenue for the MODOC path, for Orcutt Library, for Mission Canyon Sewer, and the Refugio Road paths.

And the county, the staff I think has an interest also in the priority CIP lists so we will go back, look at all of that, We hear you, and we'll incorporate some amounts into the budget. We'll figure out what that is and bring back to you a recommended budget. It will be released in May for your discussion in June.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:42:55

Okay, so at this point, we need a motion. Do we have to have you repeat it all or is that enough? That fits with the direction that we need to give in D above. I

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:43 – 5:4514 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:43:21

don't know if we spent all the money and not that I think we should try to by any means. I know we spent most of it, so all the other recommended budget expansions would be continued potentially to the June hearings. Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:43:38

And sometimes more money turns up. And sometimes less. So I just want

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:43:43

to make sure, Supervisor Lavinia remembers one year we had this windfall from the state and two days later we had a huge bill from the state for something else

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:43:51

so... Supervisor Williams?

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:43:55

So I will move the conceptual motion for incorporation into the budget that Mona articulated

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:44:04

And A, B, C, D and E up there.

CommentTOT It'sProposed5:44:07

And A,B,C,D and E as shown in the screen.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:44:13

And may I get a second? Second. Do we need public comment? I forgot about that.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:44:21

Chair Hartman and members of the board thank you for the record. We do not have any additional requests to speak on this

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:44:27

item. Okay so we have a motion and a second. Why don't you call the roll on this one?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion and a second. Why don't you call the roll
Show transcript
Supervisor Lavenino? Aye. Supervisor Williams? Aye Supervisor Hart? Aye Supervisor Nelson? Aye And Chair Hartman? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:44:42

Motion passes unanimously

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:44:44

Okay, so now a general public comment any items that were not on our agenda today Does any member of the public want to address the board?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:44:54

Chair Hartman and members of the board We have no requests to speak on general public comment today

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.805:45:00

Okay, we're adjourned to Tuesday April 19th in Santa Maria.