BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 September 20, 2022

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:066 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.803:32

Good morning. I'll call to order this September 20th, 2022 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors here in the Santa Maria hearing room. Madam Clerk, would you call the roll please?

Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Supervisor Williams? Here. Supervisor Hart? Here. Supervisor Nelson? Here Supervisor Lavinino? Here And Chair Hartman? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈20s recited, not transcribed
ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.803:52

Please stand and join me in the pledge

Next item is approval of our minutes from September 13, 2022. May I have a motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:22

So moved second

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.804:24

and any discussion seeing no lights all in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed passes unanimously CEO report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:37

Yes, good morning Chair and members of the Board. CEO Miyasato is out today she is in Columbus Ohio where she is presenting at the International City-County Managers Association and she is presenting a capstone project on regional efforts regarding equity and inclusion so she'll be back with us next week I'd also like to provide a little bit of an overview of some awards received by several of our employees in the Probation Department. The California Association of Probation Institution Officers selected Supervising Probation Officer Tiffany Phillips as the Supervisor of the Year for their Southern Region and Juvenile Institutions Officer Crystal Perez for the State Jerry Darling Award.

SPO Phillips was selected for her dedication and leadership in the successful implementation of juvenile facilities, de-escalation and crisis intervention training project. There she successfully oversaw classroom and hands on de-escalation training approaches designed to prevent and if necessary intervene in behavioral interactions. Utilizing her own excellent skills, SPO Phillips was able to lead her training team and join them in personally delivering the training to all juvenile facility staff.

And Crystal Perez was awarded the Jerry Darling Award. That award was created in order to honor Jerry Darling, who is instrumental in the development of programs and standards within juvenile institutions. This award is designed to acknowledge individuals who are devoted to the highest principles in the operation of juvenile institutions for their contributions to the field.

J.I.O. Perez was selected for her work and dedication to the trust unit where she was instrumental in design, launch and subsequent success of programs which opened in January of 2020 and was created around the tenets of positive youth development. That's all I have to report today.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.806:26

Thank you Ms. Masnuchich and they've done us proud. And now clerk

0:06 – 0:094 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:33

announcements Chair Hartman and members of the board, I do have a couple quick announcements this morning. We posted an addendum to today's agenda on Friday September 16th amending the closed session agenda. The closed session agenda was amended to include two additional closed session agenda items. The first is under conference with legal counsel existing litigation paragraph one of subdivision B of the government code section 54956.9 United States of America, XREL Judith Zizza versus County of Santa Barbara at all. United States District Court for the Central District of California case number 214 CV 06891 The second is under conference with legal counsel anticipated litigation, paragraph four of subdivision D of the government code section 54956.9 deciding whether to initiate civil litigation one case.

This amendment was posted online and has been made available to the board and members of the public. Lastly, I would like to remind the public who are participating in our meeting today of the board's updated methods of public participation. For the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or on an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of the agenda Members of the public can attend meetings in person, both in the Santa Barbara Board Hearing Room Chambers as well as the Santa Maria Board Hearing Room Chambers. Please note the board is following all local and state guidelines and are no longer requiring face coverings indoors.

If you attend the board meetings in person, you will no longer be required to wear a face covering but please be advised that the Public Health Department is still strongly encouraging all county staff and members of the public to mask and socially distance themselves in crowded areas I would also like to remind the public that if you require any special accommodations, please contact the Clerk of the Board's office to make that request preferably the Friday prior to the board meeting.

Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment virtually may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing important information about joining the virtual meeting. Once the chair has announced the item you want to comment on, please join the meeting with the information provided in the registration confirmation email. You will be placed on mute until it is your turn to speak.

The clerk will call you by name. When removed from mute, you will hear a notification that your line has been unmuted. If you are using a touch-tone phone, you may need to press star six to unmute yourself. Each person may address the board for up to three minutes at the discretion of the chair. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Clerk of the Board's Office at 805-568-2240. That concludes my announcements for today.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.809:19

Thank you, Madam Clerk. So turning to our administrative agenda I have that items A9 and A13 have been pulled. Have any other board members pulled any items or like anything else full? And do any members of the public have any items to pull?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role9:36

Chair Hartman and members of the Board we have two requests to speak from the public on item 13. All

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.809:42

right thank you would you read A9 into the record please?

0:09 – 0:1526 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role9:50

Chair Hartman and members of the board, administrative item number nine is from the General Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding an amendment number two with Endless Energy Inc for the Bettarabia campus and Fire Station 12 renewable energy project number 19026. This item is located within the second and fifth districts this item requires a forfeits vote.

Supervisor

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8010:13

Levin.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8410:14

Thank you, Madam Chair. I pulled this item just had a few questions that I didn't see in the original report and this one's this one's close to me because this is right across the parking lot so I see it every day and I was a little bit dismayed to see that where we're at because it's not It's not too surprising in the climate that we're in, that we're having problems with supply chain. So I get that what I'm most concerned about is the payoff period and we did get a late email. So payoff period, the payoff period that we were anticipating, I think was nine years or seven.

Was it nine years? And now we've moved to 11. I just want to make sure about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:04

That's correct. Supervisor Lavinia did the chair.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8411:06

And then is there one thing I'm worried about? So, I don't know that much about solar. So, I talked to Supervisor Williams about this but I just want to be clear on this too. Is it so those panels have been up there for a couple of years already. What's what's the degradation? What have we lost by the time that we get it plugged in? What have we lost in the use of those and what's their lifespan in this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:28

So I'm going to hand this over to John Green, who has taken on this project too. To get it moving forward so with that

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8411:38

John go from the from the jail to the next. Yeah, they only give them hard, easy ones. You get all the easy ones. All right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:46

Good morning and Supervisor Levin, you know through the chair so we understand that panels kind of degradate about half a percent per year. Okay?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8411:59

So even in the Even in the early stage. I mean, aren't they at their most potent or do they did they degrade exponentially as they get older? Or so in the first year, we're only losing a half. So we're going to lose a percent and a half is what you're telling me

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:16

that's

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8412:16

somewhere

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:17

around there. Supervisor Levin, through the chair, it's about a half a percent per year.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8412:22

All right. Every year. And then I guess one of the other questions I'm most worried about, too, is so it seems like we're in this position where There are parts that due to supply chain issues, that the contractor is not able to get. Or just kind of explain it to me a little bit about I want to know the details of now we're buying the parts or explain that out a little bit.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:50

Yeah, Supervisor Lavinier to the chair. Great question. So the county or general services is going to procure the materials and they are out to bid currently through public purchase. We're being told that we should have the materials first. We're seeing supply chain issues on all of our projects But we're being told that we should see everything in the first quarter of 2023 be delivered. And then, we anticipate about a three months period to install that equipment. Okay

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8413:25

and then I'm trying to figure out where the increase in cost is it kind of fleshed that out for me because if we're now procuring the parts Have the parts gone up substantially increased or was it due to raw material increase in cost? Why are we paying 30% more?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed13:44

Supervisor Levin, through the chair. It's kind of a combination of things so material costs have increased since this contract was awarded in 2019. The cost of steel and concrete copper has all risen significantly and then addition to that you know labor costs have gone up and you know it's just kind of a perfect storm about this project.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8414:13

As a general practice, when we have a contract with a vendor and we see a situation like we have right now where inflation is going through the roof and supply chain issues and costs are going up. Is this common practice that we would renegotiate? I mean is it allowable under our

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:33

Supervisor Lavagnino to the chair. I don't know that it's a common practice, but in this particular project there were a lot of changes made during the course of construction that also created cost impacts to the project.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8414:47

So we are now anticipating June of 2023 and we will be producing more electrical power than we'd originally anticipated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed14:57

Yes, Supervisor Lavender to the Chair. We are generating I think it's almost 0.9 megawatt versus the 0.8 megawatts when this initially went into design so we're generating more. We're confident that we'll have the system completed and installed in June 2023 and then will go operational shortly after that depending on approvals from PG&E and when we can start generating power

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8415:24

And all the other work inside the buildings replacing all of the lighting and all that's already done. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:29

correct. The LED upgrade is complete.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8415:32

OK. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8015:34

You're

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8415:34

welcome.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8015:35

I had a question as well on the 11 year payback period. If the cost of energy continues to rise, will that then be shorter?

0:15 – 0:3030 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed15:47

Chair Hartman, that's a great question. So yes what we're seeing is when this was put together initially in 2019 it was about 19 cents a kilowatt hour and currently we're looking at 25 cents a kilowatt hour and that's expected to continue to rise so if you factor that into the formula that we put together the actual payback period is still about nine years But using the original formula that was put together for this project, we're at 11.8 years.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8016:22

Okay, thank you. I don't see any more lights and I'm still a very enthusiastic supporter of this project. I think with unstable energy prices the more we can produce here on site with solar is a very good thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed16:38

Thank you. Thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8016:40

A13 would you read that into the record Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role16:49

Chair Hartman and members of the board, Administrative Item 13 is from the General Services Department. Is to consider recommendations regarding the contract renewal for countywide security services with Triumph Protection Group.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8017:01

Supervisor Nelson?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction17:03

Yes, Chair Hartmann I understand there's some public comment. I'll be happy to go after that.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8017:09

On A13.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role17:14

Chair Hartmann and members of the board we will begin with Andy Caldwell via Zoom.

CommentBoard Hearing Room ChambersProposed · by introduction17:24

Chair Hartman, members of board, Andy Caldwell representing Colap. We understand the necessity of this item but we want to talk about the necessity of this in the context of this issue Whether or not crime rates are going down, whether or not you need the South County Jail at near full capacity and the like. Because obviously some of these buildings are in Santa Barbara, the city of Santa Barbara, some of them are in the City of Santa Maria and some of them are in the County of Santa Barbara.

And what this item means is that the county staff Doesn't feel safe, nor do they feel that their buildings and facilities are saved by way of regular police and sheriff protocols. IE that well if you got a problem you call 911. Well, the reason we're speaking here today is that we believe that there's an upwards of 84% increase in crime in our rural communities.

And a few weeks ago, we had a meeting with about 40 farmers and business owners both in the county and in the city of Santa Maria. And they talked about getting ripped off and vandalized on nearly a weekly basis. And we believe we need the extra help too, just like you feel like you need a $1.5 million supplement to police and sheriff, we need that supplement as well. And what we're asking for Is if you would consider spending another one and a half million dollars for a vertical integration prosecution unit of rural crime deputies in criminal investigator and a prosecution unit. Because these thefts and intimidations are happening on a, like I said, a weekly basis in the rural areas and the cities. Now we know that you can't do that in the cities but certainly you could help us in the rural communities.

And the bottom line is some of this is done by the homeless which I think is part of your problem but some it's also being done by crime range. And the damage is astounding to the farmers and also other businesses. So we would ask that you would not just in essence look after your own interest with this extra effort, but you would consider making an extra effort for your residents and taxpayers as well. Thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8020:16

Thank you Mr. Caldwell.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7920:21

And now we have Jim Stolberg here in Santa Maria.

CommentJim StolbergProposedself-stated20:31

Good morning, board. My name is Jim Stolberg. I'm a partner at Hampton Farming and also sit on the county's Ag Advisory Committee. We grow wine grapes and avocados from Santa Maria down to Lompoc and San Ynez. Over the past four years our company and our clients have suffered more than a dozen thefts and destruction of our property and our equipment. These damages have cost us well over $100,000 We work closely with Detective John Fleming in recovering property and attempting to prevent further damages.

However, frankly he's just spread too thin. We need you to allocate significantly warm funds for patrol officers in the county and to a dedicated prosecutor for crimes against business. I'm asking this before you are entering into this multi-million dollar contract to secure government locations. You really need to look at allocating funds to protect our businesses and our employees.

Thank you for your consideration.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7921:36

Thank you. Does that conclude

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8021:44

public comment, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role21:46

Chair Hartman and members of the board, we received a request to speak for items A1 through A4. We'll go back to those but on this item yes it does.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction21:55

Supervisor Nielsen? Yes thank you chair Hartman I think there's two issues here there's that the contract which i wanted to pull this item to talk about the contract and then there's a real crime issue and I think there's some additional speakers that might be speaking in public comment and I'll be I'll delay my comments until after they've spoken about this important issue. The reason why I brought the contract up specifically is, you know, I was opposed to this enhancement for security in the past.

We're not there as a society that we need to have that level of protection. And so I voted against this when we previously proposed it, so I'm gonna again stay consistent and vote against it today. I don't think these two issues while they're expenditures whether we move forward with this contract and whether we address some of the property rule crime out there are two important issues in our county but not necessarily connected. I'll be glad to move a little bit further ahead another time. I just wanted roll call vote on this.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8022:54

And Director Pelz, did you have something you wanted to clarify or say are just available? I'm just available for

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8423:01

questions.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8023:02

Supervisor Labadino.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8423:03

Thank you Madam Chair and I wish I remembered maybe it was you Jeanette that gave me an update on the type of items that are being confiscated at these checkpoints. I think it was you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:17

A

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8423:18

lot of meetings could you kind of just give us a rundown of what you're seeing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:22

So I would like to introduce Gary Thompson, who's our physical security coordinator and he can give us a quick update on that. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8423:31

And while Gary's coming up, I agree with Supervisor Nelson. I think these are two different items. I'm totally in support of increasing rural crime oversight. But I think this is I understand why publics trying to mix these two together, but I'd be happy to deal with that also later.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed23:49

Sure, Gary. Good morning. Good morning, Supervisor Labanino through the chair. Thank you for the question. Just to give a little background, security screening began on July 13th at our administration buildings. The technology in place is x-ray scanners and walkthrough metal detectors. So our primary focus is to reduce exposure to external risk. As the seat of county government, the administration buildings are high profile They host public hearings, are subject to protests and may have contentious debate.

We often receive visitors suffering from mental illness and erratic violent behaviors. County employees have also been targeted by opposition to political and social issues especially over the past several years. So without access control measures it was a greater disadvantage for physical security services to screen for hazards So since we implemented the security screening at the administration buildings, we ran some numbers from July 13th through August 26.

The total number of visitors combined at both locations were a little over 3,000, 3,087 persons. The total seized items were 159. That's a seizure rate of 5%. Of those items, 126 knives and those knives were anything from pocket knives to hunting knives of different sizes. 19 tools, when we say tools we're thinking about box cutters, razor blades things of that nature. 12 pepper spray canisters, two tasers and two persons with valid CCW authorized to carry were directed return their weapons to their vehicle which they did without incident and that's part of our procedure So that just gives you a little oversight of what we're collecting through this screening process. And it's not that these items are illegal to carry, I mean you can carry these legally in this country.

That's not the point. We look at a comprehensive approach to security and safety so we're looking at the big picture without screening People who want to do harm to persons would have a greater advantage to do so if we allow these items to enter our facilities. So, we're trying... We can't stop 100%, right? But we can mitigate the risk by eliminating those vulnerabilities and that's what we're trying to achieve. Thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8026:33

Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8426:35

Well personally I want to thank you for what you The others do in protecting not only us, honestly if this was just me up here and us I think we wouldn't feel like we need to do this. We have employees here that are threatened you know we have tax collection here where people get really upset if they have to come in and pay a tax or they're told that they can't do something that they want to do I think it would only take somebody out in the public about 10 minutes to look through our emails and realize there are a lot of very disturbed individuals out there.

And I just appreciate what you do, and I have no problem moving this forward. And like I said for me it's two different things, rural crime and protecting our employees that are here. I think anybody that has an issue with this all you have to do is go back and look at what happened in San Bernardino County. Ethically, just tell our employees show up and with no protection out there. So I'll be supporting this and I'll move it if once we get done with any other comments

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8027:46

supervisor Williams.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role27:48

Well, I think it's important to address and having Gary and his team about because of attraction and retention. We have a one department in particular that is exhausted from the last couple of years worth of work, and we need those folks to stick around. And you know, the death threats that were made were very real. You know, sometimes people make those and they are not deemed by law enforcement to be serious in the past six months we've had or past 12 months we've had death threats that were deemed investigatable and prosecutable.

And in that context you know it makes sense for us to be proactive instead of wait for a tragedy to happen On the issue of rural crime, I very much want to have more proactive policing. But I think people are under the false assumption that if we augment the Sheriff's budget for more personnel in rurals crime that we would actually have more people in the department. That's not what would take place.

The undersheriff came to us and said very clear what he would do is staff it with any augmentation that we made, he would staff it with people from another part of the Sheriff's Department because he is not able to recruit enough personnel to staff it with new people. So what that would do is it would just take away from patrol elsewhere or proactive policing elsewhere. We are not in a good position to be augmenting it because we would essentially then pay twice for the same officer, we would pay once for them supposed to be doing patrol in one area of the county and then chasing the next thing that we budget, we'd be paying the Sheriff's Department twice to do it over there with the same person. And obviously that person can only be in one place at one time so that the way to solve this is we need to improve attraction and retention of our sheriff's personnel and that means you know morale in the department.

That means addressing morale in the department That means addressing, you know, issues in the department. And it means going out there and, you know, recruiting great young local people to join the Sheriff's Department and do a little bit of heroism in their hometown. And, you know, judging from some of the folks that have done really well in the last couple years, you may think you're too old for the sheriff's department, but you are not.

So, yeah, If you have a clean record, come talk to us.

0:30 – 0:3210 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8030:52

If we could keep our comments to this item that is security. Rural crime really isn't on our agenda today. We can ask that it be agendized and get some options coming back from us. Supervisor Hart?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role31:06

Everything's been said except that and I think I would welcome putting another item on the agenda to talk about.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8031:12

Okay, Supervisor Nielsen?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction31:14

Yes thank you. You know I don't want to debate the merits of security or I just want to make sure that we don't poke holes in what the efforts that are being done, because I understand there's you know if we're going to pay for this. I want to make sure it's done in a way that is effective but you know we need to consider you know that some of these things out there that make us want to protect our employees A crime that was an employees on employees.

You know, I'm the expert U.S. Postal Office using employees on employees so you know when we talk about crimes against government employees when you look at the whole picture again I want to make sure Again, if you're spending these funds that they're done in a way that it really does provide protection. You know the list of things that were screened there sounds like a barbecue in Santa Maria I mean that's just not there's not a lot there that concerns me.

That's you know best thing to prevent a bad guy with a weapon is a good guy with a weapon and so Hopefully that's a police officer, but in some cases when minutes count, you know cops or with seconds counting cops are minutes away. So it isn't good sometimes to have good citizens that are willing to step in the gap. So anyway I'm again made my comments about this and I would like to roll call

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:36

vote. Supervisor Labanino will you move that? I'll

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction32:39

move A13.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:40

All right and may I add a second?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8432:44

Second.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:45

And Madam Clerk, could we have a roll call vote please?

Roll-call vote Passed 3–1 move A13. All right and may I add a second? Second. And Madam Clerk, could we have a roll call
Show transcript
Supervisor Williams. Aye. Supervisor Hart. Aye Supervisor Nelson. No. Supervisor Lavinino. Aye and Chair Hartman. Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role32:56

Motion passes four to one and

0:32 – 0:356 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8032:59

so we have the public A1 through A4 and people would like to comment on each of those individually I gather is that correct madam clerk

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role33:10

Chair Hartman and members of the board, it is one public commenter that would like to comment on looks like the bundle of those items.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8033:19

Okay I think we have to read them each end of the record and then you can make your comment but we won't read them individually and have you comment if that's all right?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role33:33

Chair Hartman and members of the board, administrative item number one is from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding agreement number 22-20133 with the California Department of Health Services County Mental Health Plan fiscal years 2022 through 2027 Administrative item number two is also from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the First Amendment to the agreement with the Santa Barbara County Education Office, fiscal years 2021 through 2022.

Administrative item number three is from the Behavior Wellness Department. Is to consider recommendations regarding the behavioral wellness staffing contract with Stock Star Medical Partners LLC, fiscal years 2021 through 2024. Administrative item number four is also from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Behavioral Wellness American Rescue Plan Act Mental Health Agreement with Flanc Perp Valley Community Healthcare Organization, fiscal years 2022 through 2024. Thank you.

PresenterJill Bolster-WhiteTransitions Mental Health AssociationProposedself-stated34:44

Thank you. Sorry, I did not realize that my request to speak included that. I'm Jill Bolster-White. I am the Executive Director of Transitions Mental Health Association. We're a contractor with the Behavioral Health Department and I just wanted to indicate my support for the department and these items. We've just been really happy to work with Director Navarro and her team. And so that's really all I wanted to say. I did want to mention, I'd be remiss as a mental health advocate though, just to mention in the last presentation It's important not to conflate mental health diagnoses and violence. It's really important that we acknowledge that people who have a diagnosed mental illness are usually the victims of crime and not the perpetrators, so it is a distinction I wanted to make.

So thanks for...

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8035:31

Thank you very much, and thank you for being here. We appreciate your work. So that concludes our administrative agenda. We'll go to public comment. I imagine we'll hear more about rural crime there, and can you give direction? Yeah, we'll get there. All right. So may I have a motion to approve the balance of the administrative agenda?

0:35 – 0:4710 turns

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction35:55

I'll make that motion

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8035:57

in this second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? The balance of the administrative agenda is approved. So now we'll go to resolution number 16, the administrative item number 16. Madam Clerk, would you read that into the record?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role36:17

Chair Hartman and members of the Board, Administrative Item 16 is sponsored by Supervisor Labanino. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of September 22, 2022 as National Recovery Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Amy Lopez. And I will now read the resolution into the record. Whereas the Santa Barbara County Behavioral Wellness Department provides, in partnership with community-based organizations, a continuum of care which includes the prevention, intervention, treatment and recovery for mental health and substance use challenges. Promoting the message that behavioral well, behavioral health is essential to wellness. And whereas mental health and substance use disorders affect Santa Barbara County and all communities nationwide And with the commitment and support, those impacted can embark on a journey of improved physical health, emotional health and overall wellness.

And whereas the Recovery Month theme, Recovery is for Everyone, Every Person, Every Family, Every Community celebrates all people that make the journey of recovery possible and spreads the message that people can and do recover every day. And whereas Recovery Month promotes new evidence-based treatments for those battling addiction and focuses on recovery practices that need, and the need for a strong recovery community with service providers who help people who are undergoing recovery. Through Recovery Month people become aware and able to recognize the signs of mental health and substance use disorders and encourage people in need of recovery services to seek support and treatment And whereas the County of Santa Barbara Behavioral Wellness Department collaborates with partner agencies and community-based organizations in all areas of the county to ensure everyone has the opportunity to achieve and sustain long term recovery by improving their health and wellness, living a self directed life, and striving to reach their full potential.

And whereas we encourage continued collaboration and integration of services to ensure success for individuals and groups who are in long-term recovery. And whereas the Recovery Month observance will continue to work to improve the lives of those affected by mental health and substance use disorders, by raising awareness and educating communities about the effective services that are now available, and by celebrating all recovery achievements. And now, therefore be it and it is hereby ordered to resolve that this Board of Supervisors proclaims September 2022 as National Recovery Month in Santa Barbara County and encourages all residents to support men, women, youth, and their families who are in drug and alcohol addiction treatment and mental health recovery programs throughout our county passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed39:04

Good morning, Chair Hartman and Supervisors and County staff. We're really excited to be here today to celebrate National Recovery Month. I'm going to turn it over to our Alcohol and Drugs Program team. I'd like to introduce to you all though Melissa Wilkins who is now our Division Chief over Alcohol and Drug Programs for the first time announcing her and introducing her to you all in that new role. And this is Amy Lopez, Program Manager of Alcohol and Drug Programs and they have a presentation for you and they brought goodie bags for you so if I can pass those out to you while they're speaking.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed39:34

Thanks, Tony. Chair Hartman and members of the board, thank you for having us here today. This is always the fun part of the meetings and we really appreciate your acknowledgement. Tony stole some of my thunder. This is our new division chief Melissa Wilkins. I'll just say it again. Very excited to have her here today and glad that they came down from South County to join us here In our favorite North County.

And I would, I wanted to introduce the team that I brought here with me today if you all could just stand up from Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse we have Deshaun Chavez and Victor Vega wave your hands from Good Samaritan Shelter Services we have Lindy Morabito And Christina Vasquez, Anna Chase and Donna Flores and Kirsten Cajun. This is just a small fraction of some of the representatives from our treatment programs. We do contract our services out into the community. This is just a small fraction of those who are working the front lines even throughout the pandemic to ensure that all of our beneficiaries in Santa Barbara County have access to services.

So like Tony said, we did bring you I'm going to rephrase that they're not gifts or goodies. These are actually outreach packages so this is similar to what you would receive if you were in the community. We are in the middle of an opioid and fentanyl crisis in the country here in Santa Barbara County it's hit us pretty hard and we are like everybody else I heard I think it was Supervisor Williams talk about staffing. We struggle as well with getting the manpower out there to match the need or the demand for Narcan and overdose prevention.

We actually gave you a flyer in there, this is brand new hot off the press with information on overdose prevention, what an overdose might look like and how to administer Narcan because technically we can't give that to you without educating you on the topic There's also, we're getting really good with technology. You'll see a little scan code right here so you can go online and watch the video. Very exciting that we recently launched our Fentanyl is Forever campaign. You may have seen some commercials, radio ads in English and Spanish but we also are in a pilot project for Naloxone Now Santa Barbara.

Just this week alone, we have sent out I think 10 kits To members who log, who go online to our website, to Fentanyl's Forever. Go to Get Naloxone. Click on Get Naloxone Now. Enter their information. Acknowledge that they reviewed the video on how to administer Narcan and then we mail a kit to them. It's pretty innovative. It is very unfortunate that in Santa Barbara County we're in the situation that we're in. That this is what we have come to but it's exciting Support from our department head, from the Board of Supervisors and from all of our contracted providers in getting the word out.

Educating the community and providing treatment to our beneficiaries who need it. Did I miss anything? It is recovery month, and that's why we're here. We're celebrating recovery. Recovery is for everyone. I do have to say that substance abuse does not discriminate. It impacts all communities, all walks of life north south. And so we are here to celebrate recovery in every small step of recovery is a celebration.

And we had two events so far one in Lompoc One in Santa Maria, and we have another one on Monday the 26th at Sunken Gardens from 4 to 7 p.m., again to celebrate recovery and all the efforts that families make to be in recovery. And we have two amazing guest speakers, music, games, prizes, and food. So we encourage you all to come out with us and celebrate recovery and celebrate the efforts that the community has made to be in recovery themselves.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8043:51

Thank you very much. I just wanted to say, I was at a Labor Day picnic and B-Well was there. I was at the event in Lompoc and B-Well and many other county departments were there. And what strikes me is that you're not sitting in your office waiting for people to come. You're getting out You're hiring people. I went to an Allan Hancock College event where they featured somebody who you've hired, somebody who had been in gangs, been in prison, been addicted and recovered got his AA degree now he's working towards his So I'm going to start by saying thank you to the Board of Supervisors.

All that you're doing in outreach and meeting people where they are is extremely important. And I just wanted to add, Supervisor Nelson and I have participated along with B-Well and others in the Sheriff's forums on fentanyl and can't overestimate How devastating that is and that fentanyl is sneaking into other drugs. For example, in Hollywood the stars no longer use cocaine because it may be tainted with fentanyl and kill them so it gets into other kinds of drugs and you don't know that And it comes in pills that look like they're legitimate and they're not. So you have to be really, really careful. I don't know if you'd like to say any more about that Director Navarro but about the camouflage and why you may not be having what you think you're having and why you have to be so careful?

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed45:47

I just really appreciate you making an announcement and as the Board of Supervisors in our county family knows, we lost a beloved county family member this past weekend just to that exact thing. Taking a pill that you don't know is tainted with fentanyl and leaving behind a young family and a devastated county family so just really appreciate you getting the word out they were Mom was a close family friend.

And I just really want to make sure that the community knows It's not just at these events that we have information and access. I'm here giving out our stress balls today that have the information, Naloxone Now on our website can get free Narcan and just encourage everyone to see, to have Narcan available to you and your family because you just don't know because it is that dangerous and really asking people to work with their healthcare providers when they're not feeling well, when they think they need something to feel better whether that's pain or emotional pain Please go to the professionals and seek professionals.

Our county is experiencing literally an epidemic was in a meeting yesterday with the sheriff, and we are on track. Unfortunately, about a 40% increase in accidental overdose deaths in this county in this year alone already so thank you and please reach out. We have our information right on the front page of our website for be well. We have the naloxone now and When we when you come to outreach events, we have lots of information for you and as family members or yourselves to begin a journey of recovery.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8047:28

Thank you,

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:30

Tony. You just mentioned a number of how many deaths thus far this year?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed47:36

OK, I'm I'm is it was one hundred and twelve one hundred and twelve Yesterday, Sheriff Brown was anticipating upwards of 190 by the end of the year. If we go on track with how many deaths we've had in the last few months.

0:47 – 0:5716 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8047:57

Thank you for really emphasizing what we're facing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed48:02

Thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8048:05

So now we are turning to general public comment for items not on today's agenda but within the Board of Supervisors and counties purview. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role48:16

Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have five requests to speak on general public comment. We will start with Reve Moran via Zoom to be followed by Ana Citrin.

PresenterRevae MorinLeague of Women Voters of Santa BarbaraProposedself-stated48:32

Hello, my name is Revae Morin and I'm with the League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara. We are here to celebrate National Voter Registration Day today which is a wonderful event and I wanted to alert you I'm the VP for voter service with our local league and I wanted to invite you all to come to some events that we're having to educate voters very soon. You can go to our website lwvsantabarbara.org to find out everything that's going on with the local league.

The first one I want to highlight is, it's only two, a candidate forum for the state assembly race for District 37. We're still in District 37 but it looks very different than it used to and the two candidates we will be featuring are Greg Hart and Mike Stoker. It will be a forum available to the public The Santa Barbara Women's Club 670 Mission Canyon Road or you can watch it live streamed on our Facebook page or on, you can come via Zoom. So go to our website for more details on that. It's on October 6th at 6pm at the Santa Barbara Women's Club. We're also having a pros and cons forum on October 13th, which is a Thursday at 6pm that will be done via Zoom. We will be talking about all of the statewide propositions, all seven of them that will appear on the ballot and some local measures and initiatives so Please come and watch.

It will be recorded for later viewing, and we'll be posting it on our website that you can attend that day by getting the Zoom link from our website lwvsantabarbara.org Thank you all and happy National Voter Registration Day.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7950:23

Thank you. Madam Clerk, our next speaker

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role50:35

Ana, you've been unmuted so if you want to unmute yourself on your end.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role50:38

Good morning can you hear me?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role50:40

We can.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role50:42

Good morning Chair Hartman and Supervisors. Ana Citrin with the Law Office of Mark Shatillo representing the Santa Barbara Coalition for Responsible Cannabis. With droughts increasing in frequency and duration and our water resources increasingly scarce it is critically important that all water users play by the rules And that state and local agencies, including the county exercise their jurisdiction over projects within their purview. to ensure they have a demonstrated water supply, including the legal right to use and store adequate water for the proposed use.

Cannabis cultivators specifically are subject to the State Water Board's cannabis policy which prohibits the diversion of surface water including subterranean surface flows during a forbearance period that includes the summer months. Unfortunately what we discovered after many months of investigation detailed in the 162 page complaint We filed just over a week ago with the California EPA State Water Resources Control Board and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife is that many of the cannabis cultivators located along the Santa Ynez River are illegally diverting subterranean surface flows of the river.

Moreover, these diversions are concentrated during the dry summer months when the forebear Forbearance period should apply and when the effects of the additional diversions including on downstream water users are particularly pronounced. Our complaint, which you should have a copy of is directed to the state agencies and their failure to enforce their cannabis cultivation policy. And the factual and legal questions posed in the complaint for the state to resolve.

The county also has an important role, however. As the county's permit review process can and should function as an important check to ensure cannabis cultivation projects are in compliance with the State Water Board's Cannabis Cultivation Policy. I want to draw your attention to one portion of our complaint specifically. The third document in the complaint, the report prepared by Ms. Anderson includes a section starting on page 97 of the PDF that describes what went wrong in the processing of these projects at the county level that led to these illegal diversions not being flagged and being allowed to occur.

A core problem is that the county's cannabis permit process has not included water rights and the issue of surface water diversion in its evaluation of these applications. The County CEQA checklist focuses solely on compliance with water quality, which is another portion of this State Water Board policy when it should also separately address water rights. Our hope in sharing this complaint is that the county will take affirmative steps to better integrate water rights into the cannabis permit review process and specifically improve coordination with the state with regard to water rights, specifically.

Thank you very much for your time and attention.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role53:58

Thank

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8053:58

you, Ms. Citron.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role54:00

Next we have Bonnie Elliott to be followed by

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7954:03

Virginia Sousa Hi,

CommentBonnie ElliottProposed54:10

this is Bonnie Elliott. Can you hear me? We can I wanted to talk to you about an accessibility item and a security issue also. I am in a wheelchair, power wheelchair, and I had an incident on August 12th at two o'clock where I was in a group that had a guided tour to the clock tower, the workings of the clock tower in the county building when we were Taken to the, to the docent.

Where she was located, there was also security guards. I was not able to go down the steps to where the security guards were. I was not checked at all. They did not check any of my bags. I had two bags on me. They did not check them. I could have gone through. I did go right through and I could've caused a major mess. When the docent saw me She literally freaked out. She looked at me and she goes, oh we had a situation! I mean she literally said that. She had no idea what to do with the person in a wheelchair. I have since found out that docents are all volunteers. They're organized by an organization, a non-profit that's It's a nonprofit has nothing to do with any of the government stuff, which is really bad because you need to pay attention as the Board of Supervisors who's representing the city.

That was horrible. That was absolutely a horrible experience. We did go on the tour. There is no signage anywhere regarding alternative routes there used to be before the pandemic they've gone away. No one knows Our very few knows very well what other elevators to take. There's no signage in the elevator, what floor to go for if you're in a wheelchair? There's nothing guys. What's going on?

This is awful and you guys this people from all over the world come or come to the tower, come to the courthouse to see too for the tours. This is awful. What else? Oh, we made it. We did good when we finished the tour which we were interrupted by the way numerous times. We had to close the door to keep people out but it was hot in there so you need a fan. Coming back down we got off on the wrong elevator and we were at the steps by the information window or whatever The guy was rude to us. He goes, go back in the elevator and go down to blah, blah, whatever this is for. Anyway, there should have been a sign in the elevator, what button push for person in a wheelchair? It's not, it's so easy to fix on the outside of the building. There's no way to...

There is a wheelchair access I've seen the signs they're gone as to bypass the grounds. Thank you for your time.

not transcribed≈5s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8057:26

Thank you Ms. Elliott and I see that our ACEO is taking copious notes on all that you said and we really appreciate you bringing that to our attention.

0:57 – 1:0714 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7957:41

Virginia Seuss, I'd like to be

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role57:43

followed by Larry Farini

PresenterVirginia SouzaSanta Maria Valley League of Women Voters serving all of North Santa Barbara CouProposedself-stated57:46

Good morning Supervisors I'm Virginia Souza, President of the Santa Maria Valley League of Women Voters serving all of North Santa Barbara County. Today we're here to celebrate National Voter Registration Day for the 10th year. The League of Women Voters was formed over 100 years ago as women were lobbying long and hard for that right to vote. The league continues to be highly valued in communities across the country for providing nonpartisan, factual voter information And for activities promoting voter access and registration. Here in Santa Maria we've had numerous registration drives at the local college, Allan Hancock, campuses in Lompoc and Santa Maria. And we are hosting a talk by County Clerk Registrar of Voters Joe Holland this Saturday at 11am in our public library 412 South McClellan Street Followed by a second talk at 2 p.m.

in Guadalupe at Little House by the Park, 4681 11th Street. The topic is safeguarding your votes in Santa Barbara County. October 19th at 630 p.m., in Ethel Pope Auditorium at Santa Maria High School, League of Women Voters Santa Maria Valley will partner with future leaders to host a candidate forum for the Santa Maria Joint Union High School Board of Trustees.

We have some pros and cons on all the propositions to pass out to our audience today along with some easy voters that come from our national headquarters in our state. Thank you for this speaking opportunity.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.8059:28

Thank you very much for being here and all the work you do to protect our civic society and our government.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role59:35

Larry Craney, to be followed

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.7959:36

by Bob Engel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed59:45

Hi good morning Chair, Supervisors thank you for being here and for your service I wanted to talk to you about the effects of rural crime on our ag community. And just, I know you guys hear a lot of statistics but I have a chart here from from our office and it's about once a month we get hit and it's usually between ten and thirty thousand dollars of damage Well, damage and theft. And how this affects our employees is something maybe we don't hear about. I see how it does affect our sheriffs.

There's so much crime out there that it kind of diminishes their morale. And it's gonna be a big task as Supervisor Williams was discussing, let's not throw money at it or one thing but so a tractor gets stolen and some drip tape and some materials the crew comes the next day well there's nothing There's no tractor, there's no materials. So they lose the wages for that day too so that crime spreads out those effects.

We have smaller growers on both sides of one of our farms but we farm Lompoc, Los Alamos, Guadalupe and Santa Maria. So we're gonna spread all over. We have a lot of neighbors and one neighbor yesterday he said well I am going to stay out at my field, right? And try to protect my assets. And that's out of frustration but that's not good. He has a family he should be home with his family.

I'm worried about his safety if he's out there by himself and we have people we don't even know all these guys what could happen to him right and then what are those effects So I'm hopeful that we can all come together and maybe get this agendized, and I'll start to work on it collectively. Thank you for your time.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:01:58

Thank you Mr. Farini for being here.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:02:02

And now we have our final speaker Bob Engel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:02:07

Good morning, Bob Engel, Engel and Gray. We're celebrating our 76th year in business here in Santa Maria Valley and serving the Central Coast. I'm here because I'm not quite as elegant or calm as Larry but we're getting hit hard with crime And if you think recidivism or, I do challenge with the English language so pardon that. But we need to put people in jail that commit crimes and I sat there on TV watching some lady come here give you once a month things with this graph and how great it is. We're keeping people out of prison. We're keeping people out of our jail. We built a beautiful jail here but we have a crime problem.

Larry's saying once a month, I have once a week We had Farm Day on Saturday, great open day house for the public. Everybody came Monday we show up to work three trucks had their catalytic converter cut off. So what did our employee impact? We spent all morning getting trucks to the muffler shop trying to get them street legal again. And this is not just me, this is up and down every street in Santa Maria Valley. Every rural street everything we need funding for the sheriff's I noticed on your agenda you're spending millions of dollars for your own protection for security for you guys have the Sheriff's Department put that money into the Sheriff's Department where they can do some good You need broader, bigger thinking here. You can't be not funding the police, the district attorney we need to be putting these people these repeat offenders need to go to jail and I tell you if you just read that what's left of the Santa Maria Times maybe you probably don't because you're down in South County most of the time but every one of them is on probation And then you're turning more power over to the probation department.

They can't control them. I want to know who's going to be watching all the bracelets. How are they going to track these people? We have a crime problem, we need help. You need to fund the district attorney. You need to fund the sheriff. Thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:04:24

Thank you. Madam Clerk was

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:04:27

that our final public speaker? Madam Chair yes that concludes our public speakers for today. So I think

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:04:35

Before they leave, I just ladies from League of Women Voters. I just wanted to thank you for being here. I just wanted to give a little glimpse into just my district of how severe this is. Each of us represents about 90000 people in our districts at 28000 registered voters. 5700 people showed up in the last election OK, so I'm sure Bob voted because he's fired up. We got to somehow figure out how to get it.

Yeah. Get that stress ball going. I got a feeling that thing is going to be a diamond when you get done. But and and so there's something we have to do. And I mean, no, you guys been doing this for a long time, but there's And some of it is people are fed up with their government, don't feel like their vote matters. Something's got to change. People are just disengaged and have given up so I appreciate your work and I'll be watching October 5th or 6th or whatever that is.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:05:39

Supervisor Nielsen. Yes, thank you Chair Hartman so I also attended the forum that was held a few weeks ago with some of our business owners and with the undersheriff as well as the district attorney-elect talking about rural crime and it's probably one of the top issues i hear about when i talk to my constituents um it's something that's not going away it's only getting worse according according to the statistics There's there needs to be a more concerted effort. Some communities throughout the state of California engage in task force where they get a more unified approach with, you know their neighboring counties. You know a lot of these criminals are leaving their county to come commit crime in our county and vice versa and so it needs them a more I would like to maybe have the DA and the Sheriff come back with an item.

I want to start by saying thank you to all of our board members for their hard work and dedication. You know, if it's 5 million, it's 5 million. If it's 300,000, it's 300,000. Let's solve the problem. We know that things are getting worse. We are running behind these criminals in our community and we need to have a more concerted effort to addressing this problem for all of us. So I'd like to request if we could have an item maybe come back by the end of year. I know we had some pretty busy meetings in October and November but potentially in December Thank you, Mr. Chair.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:07 – 1:119 turns

CommentAnd Supervisor NelsonProposedself-stated1:07:49

And Supervisor Nelson, you serve on the California Rural Counties Organization and I'm wondering this is not limited to Santa Barbara County. If you could participate perhaps in that process or connect us so that we can find out what's happening elsewhere?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:08:08

Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. I just got back from the annual meeting of the rural county representatives of California up in Napa this last week and this was one of the hot topics that was being discussed among my colleagues in the more rural counties of our state so I'll be glad to work with the Sheriff's Department and the DA on putting together that presentation because I think there is a lot of options we need to be exploring and it's not just a one size fits all. It's not just money and I think Supervisor Williams brings up a good point. Just because we fund a position doesn't mean it's going to get done And so that's something I continue to commit to working with you and the rest of the board in making sure we get those fully funded positions.

So that we can really expand and address things like rural crime, community crime, proactive policing. Big thing was this fentanyl is that, you know, we have a supply issue. We have a lot of fentanyl coming into community and we can't really deal with it because we're under water. So committed to that.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:09:02

All right.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:09:04

Madam Chair?

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:09:06

Yes, Supervisor Hart.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:09:07

Yeah I just want to add to the conversation. I mean it's obvious to us because we live in this world but I can understand there might be some confusion for members of the public about this subject of rural crime because you know we have independently elected sheriff and district attorney who are 100% responsible for their own departments and their use of resources Their recruitment, their commitment to different projects and emphasis on where they put their dollars. And I understand why you're here because we have regular meetings and there's an opportunity for you to come and bring this issue to our attention but ultimately those independently elected officials are responsible for taking on these challenges.

If they're telling you it's a funding problem then we need...

CommentMadam ChairProposedself-stated1:09:57

Madam Chair, members of the board. It sounds like there's definitely interest in bringing this item back and the Brown Act does allow brief responses to public comment and I think we've achieved that and I just recommend that you schedule it. All right well I'm

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:10:11

going to say my piece too And it's directly addressed to the question of whether I have to have a hearing. I do not believe that we should, since we have already allocated the money necessary to do this. We allocated $2 million in overtime and we promised up to $2 million for the department. All the department has to do is actually hire people sufficient to need the $2 million. So we have already allocated that money They simply don't get it until they actually hire the people.

And so this is a disingenuous effort to leverage us for more money when we've already promised the money for this and other public safety purposes.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:10:58

If I might just say that a task force and roles of the public and partnerships, I think it's a broader question than just hiring another rural deputy. So I think I see some nodding heads that we'd like to see that come back. And so with that, we'll close public comment and move on to departmental item number one. Madam Clerk would you read that into the record please?

1:11 – 1:2214 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:11:26

Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the Planning and Development Department. It is a hearing to consider the continuance of the Household Rezone and Tentative Track Map. Rezone number 15RZN4 and tentative track map number 15TRM11 to October 11, 2022. I would like to note that we received a request from the department to continue this item to October 11th However, we received an updated request this morning to revise that date to November 29th 2022 in Santa Maria. Representatives from the Planning and Development Department are here. I will now turn it over to Chair Hartman and members of the board for further discussion. Mr

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:12:06

Wilson?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:12:09

Good morning Madam Chair, members of the board. I also have Ms. Reese with us today who's the staff planner. As already mentioned we received late information as of this morning that the applicants are asking it to be continued once again to November and I believe the date would be November 29th so staff would support that continuance if the board so chooses

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:12:31

All right. Supervisor Nelson?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:12:33

Yes, I've been in contact with the applicant over the last couple of months trying to help them bring this item to the board and overcome some of their hurdles You know, it has been in my district. I'd like to support this motion to continue the item. I think we're close and so I don't want to go ahead and start back and take it off the agenda completely. So I would like to make a motion to continue this item.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:12:56

Seconded. Okay. And is there any public comment on this item on the matter of the continuation only? Madam Chair, members of the board I have no request to speak on this item. Thank you so we have a motion and a second all in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Turning to item number two on our departmental agenda madam clerk would you read that into the record please

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:13:25

Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number two is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the presentation on the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 coronavirus state and local fiscal recovery funds update and adjustments.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.791:13:46

Miss Anderson?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:13:49

Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the board. This item is to discuss the ARPA funding update and some adjustments as you may recall during the budget hearings your board fully allocated 86.7 million dollars of the ARPA funding onto very critical and beneficial projects so those are all currently underway in some design or procurement phase and many have several have been completed so we'll cover those today I'd like to introduce Ted Taber who's helping Nicole Parmalee who also works on the ARPA projects and he will be going over the presentation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:14:30

Good morning Chair Hartman, members of the board as Nancy mentioned today i'll be updating the Board on ARPA projects and U.S. Treasury guidance updates since the budget workshops ARPA special issue in April. I'll also be presenting some recommended adjustments previously approved projects based on actual project costs or new information Okay, so just a quick roadmap for today's presentation. We're going to start with an overview of ARPA then provide an update on projects that are currently underway and then finally we'll get to some of the recommended offsetting funding adjustments those previously approved ARPA projects So just to start with an overview of ARPA funds, $86.7 million obligated to the county. Those funds must be obligated by December 31st 2024 and expended by the end of 2026, December 30th 2026.

The intent of the funding is for community recovery needs and COVID related costs. And there's an emphasis on equity or serving underserved and low income areas. So here you see a quick list of board ARPA state and local fiscal recovery fund discussions to date. The board last discussed ARPA at the April 18th budget workshop special issue, which is the asterisked date there at the bottom.

So this is the last slide providing an overview of ARPA, but I just wanted to note that U.S. Treasury does continue to release new guidance documents and clarifications for administering and reporting on these funds. Since April, Ernst & Young is now working with the County Executive Office and county departments to help document project eligibility and program or project compliance such as procurement federal contract terms monitoring and reporting.

So this portion of the presentation discusses the ARPA projects with expenditures as of June 30th, 2022 or the end of last fiscal year. However all of the ARPA approved projects are listed in attachment A to the staff report on this item and I'm just going to echo that a couple times throughout this presentation So here you see the expenditures for projects that were reported to Treasury through June 30th, through last fiscal year end. And again I just want to confirm that these projects are still incurring expenses and these expenditures are just a snapshot as of this as the fiscal year end so most of these projects will spend all or close to the allocated amount and projects and i again just want to note that all of the projects are included in Attachment A but Most projects are just in planning or procurement phases at this time and so they are not going to be on this slide or the next slide which just shows projects with expenditures as of last fiscal year.

So here, this slide shows projects with expenditures that were reported to Treasury and also all of the highlighted projects are fully expended or complete as of that time, as of June 30th And just a quick note on the allocated amount column, that does not reflect the recommended adjustments that we'll discuss later on in this presentation. So these completed projects or projects that have spent all of the ARPA money are the Santa Maria Juvenile Hall HVAC replacement.

So $400,000 of ARPA funds were approved or obligated and that money is fully expended but the project is still underway with some additional funding required to complete the project. And the final portion of this presentation we'll get to some funding adjustments for that project. The COVID-19 response project vaccination PPE prevention in congregate settings and vaccine incentives that 1.9 million dollars was fully expended The Hedges House of Hope or El Calejo property, $1.4 million of ARPA funding helped complete acquisition of a homeless house in Isla Vista. I do want to confirm that the 1.4 was just ARPA dollars other public dollars were leveraged for that acquisition and the shelter is currently operating as a 50 bed homeless shelter.

The Community Recovery Resource Hub project was completed by internal staff with some website consulting hours, which helped result in some project savings. The whole total project came in about $18,000 to complete and so some of the balance of that allocated funding will be discussed later at the end of this presentation. And then finally the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. The county partnered with REACH and San Luis Obispo County to develop a long-term regional strategy in planning efforts to promote job growth throughout the region, and that was completed with $200,000 of ARPA funds.

So for the final portion of today's presentation, to get to the recommended adjustments to ARPA funded projects including those projects that were highlighted on the previous slide The recommended adjustments to ARPA funded projects are offsetting. So some recommend adjustments are up, some are down but there's no additional ARPA dollars to allocate. These adjustments are based on actual project costs such as Community Recovery Resource Hub or the Santa Maria Juvenile Hall, or in some cases new information has come to light which is driving the adjustment. Lastly, SAP does anticipate returning to the board periodically to provide updates on project expenditures and to recommend further adjustments as projects progress or need change. Future adjustments are anticipated to be needed because projects are for the most part currently in the planning and procurement phase.

So this table depicts the recommended adjustments to previously approved board items. I'm seeing it on my screen,

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.791:20:15

but not that one. The screens aren't lining up. A lag? No problem, I'll just wait. Okay, here

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:20:45

we

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.791:20:45

go.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:20:46

So this table depicts the recommended adjustments to previously approved board items so to run down that list the Toro oil water separator to the 1.5 million dollars of previously awarded ARPA funds Public Works has requested a less restrictive funding source to expedite the complex procurement process for this project CO staff worked with Ernst & Young consultants to identify eligible general fund costs incurred in exchange, incurred to exchange sources with this critical public works project when no additional GFC needed.

So those are the first two columns there. One is the oil water separator and the next one is just offsetting that project costs with GFC backfill. The next project then would be the community recovery resource hub, which was completed under budget as I mentioned previously so $18,000 was spent in a balance of $182,000 is recommended to be distributed to other projects.

Next one on the list there is the Santa Maria Juvenile Hall HVAC facility. As I previously mentioned, ARPA funds were exhausted but there's about $79,000 of additional work required to complete the project. And lastly, the need for security service on county properties as part of the Homeless Encampment Strategy has recently become apparent since the Homeless Encampment Strategy was discussed by the board in October 2021 as part of Health and Human Services Recovery Plan.

So that's the $63,000 on the final item there. And just noting the net change is zero as these are offsetting and there's no additional ARPA dollars to allocate. Here on the screen you see the recommended actions and I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you.

1:22 – 1:2718 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:22:30

Do board members have any questions? Supervisor Nielsen

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:22:35

Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. Thank you Mr. Tiber for the presentation so some of these expenditures were actually giving money to NGOs or other organizations are they also required to have the money spent?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:22:47

Yes it's the same expenditure period whether it's a county project or we call an external project okay

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:22:53

right and then I heard that you're going to keep coming back to the board with periodic updates How will we, you know it's staff kind of looked at the different projects and were able to reallocate that internally. Is there like a next set of priority or some type of policy that you guys are working off of other funds that might potentially be freed up? You know obviously we're only spend about five million of eighty six million right now and that's really concerning.

I know you have a lot of things in works, in the planning stages and that we're hopefully going to be ramping up and expending these dollars not losing them to our community. But as we get closer to that, was it 2026? Are we gonna have safeguards in place for us to be able to allocate those money to other board priorities?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:23:49

Supervisor Nielsen through the chair, thank you for that. Remember that there are some items that are over a three year period so we wouldn't see that expending in each or we would see that expanding in each respective year. I anticipate we will probably come back twice a year. So, I think we're going to be in front of your board again before June 30th as these procurement processes go through and give your board an opportunity for reallocation. We do have a list still available for projects that were not funded and we are periodically getting Request when coming in that we have our consultant look at and add to the list, and your board will see that again.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:24:36

Well thank you I think we're definitely having this part of the budget overall budget discussion is really important as well so i'm sure it's going to be one of the special issues items for the next few budget cycles and um thank you for the presentation and your diligence to make sure that we're being transparent and good fiduciaries of these funds

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:24:57

Madam Clerk is there any public comment?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:25:03

Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have no request to speak on this

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:25:06

item. Thank you. Ms. Anderson, so it's not only spending all the money but making sure that the money we spent is in categories that the federal government will pay for. Could you describe what kind of auditing or how the federal government, how we report, how they ensure that the funds are spent in the categories that they require?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:25:30

I'll start and then I think I'll let Ted because he's been, he and Nicole have been actively preparing those. We do have to record a report quarterly on the expenditures and we do have Ernst & Young now as our consultants they are spending quite a bit of time with the departments who are incurring expenditures to ensure that One from the beginning of the procurement process, that language appropriate and the understanding with the vendor or consulting services.

These are federal dollars and how those have to be accounted for. So it's quite strict and it's really a constant look at the documentation that departments are working with but we are pleased to have EY helping us with that process. Anything I should add?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:26:23

No, I think that was a pretty comprehensive summary. I just note we have in addition to the quarterly expenditure reporting to Treasury there's also the annual recovery plan which is now recently was completed and it's on the CEO's website and then we also have yeah yeah that pretty much covers it so the quarterly and annual plans.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:26:39

And do you ever hear from the federal government or it's just kind of they check off that we submitted it?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:26:45

Yeah, so there's a process of submitting by a certain date. And as long as you do that, you don't typically get notified but they do keep us warned that you have, you know, a week until something is due. So far we have met all the deadlines.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:27:00

Okay well done. So it's back to the board and need a motion for A through D in staff recommendation?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:27:10

I'll move the staff recommendation. Second.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:27:16

Supervisor Nelson, any further comments?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:27:17

No, it's ready to vote.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:27:18

Okay, all in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Madam Clerk would you read item number three into the agenda please? Into the record.

1:27 – 1:364 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:27:31

Chair Hartman and members of the board administrative item number three is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a post-action report on the Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission process

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:27:47

Miss Anderson again.

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:27:49

Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the board. This item is to file with your board a post-action report on the Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission, or CIRC. You may recall the last time we provided an update to your board on the redistricting process was to file the CIRCs adopted final map in early January. At that time, the CIRC had committed to compiling feedback and recommendations on the process to help improve the next cycle which takes place in 2030.

So today's presentation, we want to provide just a brief overview of the CERC 2020 process and review the Commission recommendations for the next cycle. And we separated these into items that require rotor approval, some that we're working on to still have determination to be made, and some that are process and procedure changes only that are quite simple to implement. We also are going to do have a slide on the 2020 redistricting costs, just so you have a general idea of what that over your process took. Some next steps and then we'll go into any board action for today.

So the establishment of the CERC started in 2018 with Measure G. And the 11-member CERCC was comprised of county residents who were not elected officials, lobbyists, candidates, campaign donors or close family members of those who are. After applications were closed in August of 2020, the elected official selected a pool of the top 45 candidates or qualified applicants. Our district attorney drew the first five initial commissioners and then those five picked the remaining six by the end of December.

We had about roughly 40 meetings that were held over this time period and then the CERC adopted its final preferred map on December 13th. That was provided to your board in early January and became effective January 13th, and the CERC had held a final public meeting on May 23rd to collect the feedback and produce the recommendations that you see today. They provided a final document to the county that's Attachment A and summarized those into mainly three categories, formation of the commission, commission operations and support, and completing the work of the commission.

I did want to introduce Reese Ellestad, our fiscal and policy analyst. She helped with the process over the year long way and so she'll be going over some of the recommended slides. And we'll go ahead and get started and go through that then we'll talk about some of the next steps for the process.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:30:45

Thank you Nancy. So as mentioned, I will begin with the commission's findings that would require voter approval Finding 1.2 found the pool of most qualified applicants should be increased from 45 individuals, as mentioned this could be done with amendments to the ordinance for example in their redistricting efforts San Diego County wrote a similar process to ours and scoring criteria to ours used a pool of the 60 most qualified applicants chosen by their clerk for the board In finding 1.3, the CERC requested that the score sheet used to create the pool of most qualified applicants be narrowed to guide the work of the elections official. Currently, the ordinance does set guidelines for the election official on how to select the pool of most qualified applicants but an ordinance change could define these guidelines further.

The following four findings from the commission did not have staff comments other than that an ordinance change would be required to enact them, so I'll review them briefly. Finding 1.4, currently the ordinance states that the district attorney will perform a random drawing to select the initial five members of the commission who then select the additional six members themselves.

The commission would like to see the ordinance changed to have a random drawing select all 11 commissioners, not just the first five initially selected. Finding 1.7, in the current state the ordinance left room for interpretation on what should be given the heaviest weight when selecting commissioners or their replacements either demographic diversity or proportional partisan representation. The Commission feels the ordinance should be adjusted to clarify which should be considered more heavily In finding 1.8, the commission recommends that commissioners are seated or that are currently seated on the commission until the next commission is selected which in this case will be 2030. They would like to see a change in the term of commissioner appointments so it's no longer required for commissioners to file financial disclosures until the next commission is seated which is 10 years after their work has been completed And lastly for this section, finding 2.1 the commission would like the ordinance to be changed to allow contracted service providers to not be held to the same selection criteria that is used to select and qualify commissioners themselves.

The selection criteria referred to here are items such as not having changed political party affiliation for five years and disclosure of financial investments among other things In the next section, we have items that are unclear whether they will require an ordinance change or not. Finding 1.5. This finding requests that each commissioner have an alternate selected in their place to assist with outreach and act as a shadow.

While Commissioner Turnover did appear as a problem with the current commission and alternates may be possible more research needs to be done and if this change were to be put in place it would need to be clear that these alternates would be non-voting members of the Commission. Finding 1.6 asked to determine whether members of the commission who withdrew from their service are able to rejoin the commission at a later time.

This was a scenario that occurred over the redistricting process and currently, the code does not address this specific scenario so it will be up to your direction whether to amend the code with clarification here but it may be noted that this could also be addressed in the Commission's bylaws. And lastly for this section, finding 2.2 requests that a requirement be added for consultants or contracted services to disclose partisan candidate contributions of over $500.

This finding could either be addressed in the ordinance or be part of the vendor selection process. So now I'll move into the suggestions made by the SERC for procedural changes, which if it approved at this time are ready to be implemented. Finding 1.1 requests that the timeline of commissioner appointments be moved sooner than the required deadline. This is an easy change and would just require county staff to begin the application process sooner in the next redistricting commission.

The next two findings, 1.9 and 2.3 deal with the marketing and outreach of the commission. The commission would like to see more broad recruitment done to recruit candidates for the applicant pool and that any general marketing and outreach contract that is given be awarded to a business with a presence already established in Santa Barbara County. In findings 3.1 and 3.2, the commission has requested that public comment be posted earlier than the required timeline which is currently set as the same as other public hearings. They also requested that commissioners receive a per diem for mileage both of which can be done or were already allowed in the current commission. I will clarify that the commission did have the option to apply for mileage reimbursement and some commissioners did choose to do so however they did not receive a flat rate per diem for their work on the commission Next, the commission had two findings 3.3 and 3.4 that can be requested of the demographer during their next vendor selection process.

The first being that the Commission have a role in selecting the mapping tools used and the second being that training on how to use these tools begin earlier in the process. The last two procedural findings of the commission, 3.5 and 3.6 are that the commission website to be expanded to include Voting Rights Act requirements and other redistricting rules in more accessible language than what was currently available which is the ordinance and codes written as they're legally written.

Additionally that non-commissioners including members who applied to serve and were not selected be used for outreach and on ad hoc committees As Nancy mentioned, I'll go over a brief overview of the 2020 redistricting costs. So $800,000 was budgeted and as you can see the project came in under budget at $629,262. The bulk of the costs were in legal counsel, contracted administration for clerking on the public meetings and marketing. We would like to note that the CEO's office had 1100 hours of staff time dedicated to this project that is not included in the cost above but this was existing staff time.

1:36 – 1:4412 turns

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:36:58

Okay, so that brings us to the next steps. We do have some time obviously but we do want to give your board the opportunity to direct us on how our time should be spent on this. County Council and the CO's office has already identified some ordinance changes that do not require voter approval that relate to the 2010 redistricting processes are obsolete. So we are going to be working on those and bringing them back to your board.

And if your board is interested, we can research and provide further analysis or options for potential changes to the ordinance that would require voter approval as the board directs. Here's the board recommendations, so we're happy to answer any questions that you may have and take direction.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:37:44

So

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:37:45

are you asking us for our opinion on these recommendations?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:37:52

Supervisor Williams through the chair, I think the direction would perhaps be at a later date to bring back to your board maybe some options of ways or language that can be proposed in the ordinance that could resolve some of these challenges that the CERT Board indicated with recommendations.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:38:21

And just to follow on, that would be better to do now rather than waiting until closer to 2030.

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:38:29

Supervisor, I'm sorry Chair Hartman. Yeah we are going to be bringing back the 2010 changes sometime in the next year and a half or so. So perhaps that would be when we bring that back we can have that discussion

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:38:50

Madam Clerk, is there any public comment on this item?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:38:54

Chair Hartman and members of the board we have one request to speak. Lee Heller via Zoom

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:39:02

Chair Hart and members of the board, good morning. As some of you might know I think I attended every meeting but one of the CERC so I watched the process very closely and have given a lot of thought to things that could be improved and participated in the review that led to the report that was summarized for you A little bit of a response to the presentation you just received. I am skeptical that the Board of Supervisors can weigh in on the issue of whether or not a commissioner who leaves is allowed to return, that may need to be modified by the voters or in the bylaws.

I also want to point out that the problem with earlier appointment of commissioners is the same problem we had with the extended process that was inflicted by the pandemic, which is that people's lives change. So I think six people left and a couple of those were people that moved or had other demands on their lives that changed their availability So an earlier appointment process probably isn't going to benefit us in terms of reducing the turnover rate. I would agree that earlier posting a public comment would be helpful, I think if we had better clerical support from the contracted demographer we would have seen that be better done And beyond that, I would just say that most of the problems that were identified are probably going to have to be revised in a new ballot initiative rather than by the board.

But you can certainly provide guidance and I do think the sooner the better and any guidance you provide now none of you is probably going to be on the board when this comes up again in nine years but your insights and changes now will help to guide the next board going forward. Thank you very much.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:40:43

Supervisor Nelson.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:40:45

Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. We'll see Dr. Heller we'll see no well you know I really want to thank staff for this presentation as well as the commissioners and everybody involved in this process. I tuned in not every meeting but many of them And wow, I mean if this wasn't making bacon in a very transparent way. 11 people making decisions, it's hard for us with just five people making some of these decisions we have to do for the Board of Supervisors to have 11 people from diverse backgrounds that didn't sign up to be live on TV. A lot of them were just trying, they thought they're gonna go to a couple committee meetings and just be good public servants and it really turned into, for some of them, a full-time job Over that year and a half, and so I'm a heroic effort by me involved.

And it's one of those things where you know we got the public decided here at the end of the day. That's what you know obviously there was advocates on both sides trying to push lines and try to advocate for different things We're going to go ahead and get started. I'm going to give you a little bit of background on how we got here. In the future, and I don't know if what we did in Santa Barbara County is a lesson for them to learn or a model.

But I think it can be a model because I think what you did is, I do believe it was an honest process. And I do believe that in the end, it's something that we could all live with or we all have to live with. I mean, I would like to see the ordinance amended by voters. The way it was done originally, Partly my fault, it was done hastily. And we ended up with something that I thought was a good job by Supervisor Williams and his staff that kind of put together much of this ordinance.

But there's a lot of unintended things that come up. I think this is the democratic process where we should go back to voters make a case for here's the things that worked well here are things that didn't. And ideally, I'd like to see bipartisan support behind some alterations of this. There's some details that should still be negotiated on how they're selected and the criteria there. I think those are things that are open for some debate.

But I would like to support adopting the changes that we can, but then also I'd be happy to work with any of my colleagues or anybody in the community who wants to change the ordinance and then you know structurally and then bringing it to the people. That's one of the great things about a citizen initiative is that for it to be changed, it needs to be done by the people.

And I think the sooner we do that, the better because then like as Dr. Eller said, it doesn't seem as politicized. I think we'll have a lot likely to have more unified support throughout the county if we do it sooner than later so people aren't gaming in or trying to figure out how they can bring benefit to themselves or others. So I'd be supportive of that.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:44:03

Supervisor Williams?

1:44 – 1:5414 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:44:07

I think that it's definitely a learning experience, but I think despite the fact that there were revolts or results that were inconvenient for me politically and maybe more than inconvenient. It's still a worthwhile endeavor to try to make redistricting less of Power play and less subservient to the interests of us, and more subservient to the interests of the people.

Of the of the county. And I think most of the recommendations, I think are good, especially those that seek to have a higher number of pool or a bigger pool, bigger number of people ready to take over if someone else drops out in step with that. I actually think even though I know You know, there was a partisan difference of opinion about having someone who drops out come back.

That could just as easily have gone the other way and been... So I think we want to keep as many people in the mix as possible so that there's enough people to fulfill the partisan and demographic requirements without these very hard decisions about which criteria to prioritize. Ideally, your pool should be high enough that you don't have to prioritize partisanship over demographic.

I think ultimately that's what you have to do is to prioritize region and partisanship over demographic largely because it would be difficult for instance a South County Republican Latino to represent the interests of North County Democratic Latinos, right? You know that's to me communities of interest arguments are the legal underpinning of redistricting and that needs to kind Thank you, Madam Chair.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:46:52

And big shout out to Dr. Heller. I mean, I didn't even watch that. I waited till the end to start watching and then it became very painful in my house. But I wanted to thank the commissioners because as you said, this is not what they thought they were signing up for. And but for those that made it through and quite frankly, I've never reached out and thanked them personally out of an abundance of caution. I just tried to stay out And never contacted anybody. It was so difficult because our jobs are always trying to get involved in things and that was the one thing where I had always said that, I don't care what map these 11 people come up with it's going to be better than if we did it ourselves And while there were times where I was thinking that I was wrong, ended up to be correct.

They at the end of the day through some very strange bedfellows that politics and sometime getting 11 people to agree on something came up with a really workable plan. I think the idea of partisanship too is interesting because well like I said, I didn't watch many of them. I got down to the end and I was seeing people Maybe had a partisan registration, a certain way making arguments. You know, you'd say, oh, that's the South County down, but they're they're helping out this or this person's supposed to be a Republican, but this person is doing this.

It really it seemed like they put all of that to the side and did the people's business. And so I won't be around in 2030. Well, hopefully I'll be around, but not up here. But I think there's some tweaks, you know that and I think there were a lot of these that were handed out. I'm also under the impression it quite possibly could be state law that comes in. I noticed the governor today was demanding a couple of different counties take it away from the Board of Supervisors in the future so we shall see but again just huge thank you to all the commissioners have participated. That was something I'm not sure we'll ever get those people to ever do again but maybe we'll get the next person

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:49:03

Yes, well Supervisor Hart. Yeah the only thing I'd just add to the conversation is that I think a lot of the challenges that happened early on were directly related to the very small pool that was created in the first place you know had that been larger and had more Diversity, I think that the replacements of the folks at left would have been easier for everybody. And that's probably the place we should focus to make sure we have a big enough pool in the future to have to maintain the demographic and partisan registration numbers and the way that it was envisioned to work in the original ordinance.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:49:37

And a diverse enough pool. Supervisor Lavinino put his finger on something that concerns me about starting right now is if we do get state law or we do get other models out there, if we invest now, we won't have the whole panoply of options and things to consider. So it's kind of a question of when should this be done? And so does anybody else have any feelings about that? I mean, should we direct staff to go They're already doing the 2010 so they can incorporate some of this into it and I guess that wouldn't hurt.

Supervisor Nelson?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:50:16

Yeah, thank you Chairwoman. That's a good point. You know if state law comes in and makes it all move or for some things that we want to be really hard to take to electorate twice alternate measures. I think even once draws the eye of people going what are they doing here? Why are they trying to fix it? You know, so again I think you're right there's a sweet spot there. Maybe it's 2024 maybe it's 2026 give some more time although I suspect the further we get from this redistricting process that other crises will come up and people forget about this up until about a year or two before the new one and then you got that problem of people politically jockeying to try to change it to benefit themselves You know, I'm interested in starting to put something together and try to build a coalition countywide of what makes sense moving forward.

Bigger pool totally there. I still think that maybe not having an elected official, I don't know, elected official be the selector of the 60. Maybe there's a panel of judges. I think that's been done in other areas.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:51:14

And how do you determine the panel? Right.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:51:15

Well, so I mean yeah we those are all things I think that smart people should talk about and debate among themselves but and potentially be changes So I think we should, we should have those conversations now. Have something ready to go and then watch what's going on in the public and see if it's right spot or not. Items that we might as a board want to bring to the public in 2024, it might be good to have a suite of things that the county wants to propose to change. Or we keep in our pocket and wait if the environment around us is continuing to change and it's not a stable one to move forward with I think we can pull back. I don't think...I think we got a lot of time and that's a great asset to have.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:52:01

So if I understand you're suggesting we move forward and then we can decide when would be the time to put it on the ballot for those changes that are needed to go to the voters, and at least do a draft as best we can using the knowledge.

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:52:17

I think we're 22 months away from putting something on the ballot. So, I think it's July of 2024. We have to have something for June or July of 2024 to have something for the general election in 24. So I think we've got some good times. There's a lot of work that we can do. I'm glad to work with some of my colleagues and take suggestions. I don't need to be a leader. I just want to be able to provide input but I think it's something we should be working on.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:52:40

Is that agreeable in terms of timeframe? All right. That's right. OK, so we need a motion A through D and staffs recommendation and I think the direction is that will will move forward on ordinance changes and then recommendation for what and how the initiative language would be amended And when would you anticipate bringing that back, Ms. Anderson?

CommentGet NaloxoneProposed · by introduction1:53:18

So it would be 2024. I'm not sure exactly about what month but we'll find a day and make sure we're communicating that to your board.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:53:26

Okay and is that true with the 2010 ordinance changes as well? That's correct. Okay, all righty thank you. Supervisor Nelson?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:53:34

Yeah I'll go ahead and make that motion staff um the recommended actions of staff including uh the ordinance changes that can currently be made by staff as well as directing and i guess we got a long long leeway on this coming back prior to the 2024 election to have a discussion about ordinance initiative changes

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:53:56

And I will second that. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Madam Clerk, item number four.

1:54 – 1:5920 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:54:12

Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the General Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance amending portions of Chapter 12A and Chapter 24A of the County Code to regulate use of off-street county parking facilities.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:54:29

Director Powell.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:54:30

Thank you, good morning. This item is on the agenda today to approve the introduction of an ordinance amending portions of the County Code Chapter 12A adding a new Article 5. This new article regulates all off-street parking facilities owned by the county to allow better control of parking lot restrictions. This ordinance does not apply to parking lots in county parks. It also does not apply to areas such as road yards, fire stations, Tejigawas and other landfills or other county facilities that are not typically open to the public.

It also adds regulations around the use of electric vehicles and associated charging infrastructure by prohibiting extended parking in an EV spot if the vehicle is not plugged in and charging. And finally, it amends Chapter 24A of the County Code to allow for administrative fines or penalties for violations of Chapter 12A Article 5. And with that, the recommendation is to approve the introduction. The first reading of this ordinance read the title of the above ordinance into the record and waive full reading of the ordinance and then continue the item to the a administrative agenda on October 4th 2022 to consider adoption. This would be the second reading of the ordinance.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:56:04

Any questions for Ms. Bell? Supervisor Nielsen?

CommentAna CitrinProposed · by introduction1:56:08

Yes, was there a restriction on the amount of time that a car can be parked in the EV without being charging in the ordinance or was it just giving discretion to you as your designee? Correct. Okay so that's something that staff will determine whether you know is that 15 minutes at an hour? So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:56:29

right now we have it at I believe four hours or it's four hours

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:56:36

All right, thank you.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:56:38

Supervisor Williams?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:56:41

Yeah just one question about the overnight parking prohibited does this mean that is passing this ordinance mean that anyone who is representing the county at a conference and leaves their vehicle in a lot because they're carpooling with a colleague or taking a pool car would have to get your permission to do so each time?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:57:04

No. What this is attempting to do is allow us the opportunity should we need to be doing maintenance such as resurfacing you know just various things that we need to do it gives us some some way to manage the parking but we don't anticipate Managing it to that level. It's really if we're being prohibited from doing some of our deferred maintenance.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:57:33

Yeah, I'm asking partially for my employees and partially just for myself because I tend to be a kind of multimodal guy. You know sometimes I'll take the bus home and leave my car in the lot. And I definitely believe that for long trips it's great for folks to be checking out your great fleet of bolts you know? And so I do that so I want to make sure Still possible to do in the hour. The error level is just going to be set by you all and it doesn't have to be uniform, right?

Mr Gray and I have talked about it places where there's lower utilization to have a higher amount of time so that we incentivize more people to use them and incentivize more employees to purchase them, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:58:28

Correct. So I mean, the whole purpose of the ordinance is not to we're going to warn people work. This is we're not going to be heavy handed where we just need we don't have any mechanism to manage our parking lot. So this this is our some parks does public works does and now with a modification to Ordinance 12a general services will be able to manage county parking lots

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:58:56

Great.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:58:56

Supervisor Hart?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:58:57

I think that was just a perfect explanation of what we're trying to do here Ms. Bell, it's that simple.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:59:04

Okay Madam Clerk there is no public comment.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:59:09

Chair Hartman and members of the board that is correct there is no public comment.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:59:12

All right bringing you back to the Board for a motion A through C of staff recommendation.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:59:18

Move the staff recommendation. I'll second.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.801:59:20

All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously Ms. Van Molen, what's in store for us at closed session today?

1:59 – 2:003 turns

CommentMadam ChairProposedself-stated1:59:32

Madam Chair, members of the board and closed session today we have one case of anticipated litigation significant exposure to civil litigation and the details are in the agenda. We have existing litigation United States, Judith Zissa versus County of Santa Barbara. And that's a federal case in the Central District. And then we also have anticipated litigation deciding whether to initiate litigation one case and the time estimate is an hour to an hour 15 minutes.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.802:00:04

Okay, so that takes us to 12 or 1215 but we've completed our business agenda. So it's not quite as important to have the exact time but in about an hour from now

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.792:00:20

you

3:39 – 3:403 turns

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.803:39:51

Good afternoon. We're reconvening the September 20, 2022 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors here in the Santa Maria hearing room reporting out after closed session county council.

CommentMadam ChairProposedself-stated3:40:03

Thank you Madam Chair, members of the board. The board met in closed session on three items. Anticipated litigation significant exposure to civil litigation one case and the backgrounds listed in the agenda. One case of existing litigation Zissa versus County of Santa Barbara and that's a federal case in the Central District and another case of anticipated litigation decision whether to initiate civil litigation one case and the board took no reportable action.

ElectedJoan HartmannChairProposedvoiceprint 0.803:40:32

All right, we adjourn to Tuesday October 4th 2022 in Santa Barbara.