UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:022 turns
Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Supervisor Caps?
Well, thank you Chair Hartman and to my new colleagues. I like the fact that it was a school bus in your dream because I came straight from our schools to be here and it means a lot to serve with you Chair Hartman. It's not a bad thing to have doubled our female voices up here, I would say. And I want to also thank Governor Newsom for quick action in making sure that we literally didn't skip a beat between Supervisor Hart's impeccable service And mine, which starts today.
In addition to hopefully his calm and collected demeanor up here I'm off to a good start by hiring two of his team members Chris Henson and Daniela Aguirre so I'm off to a great start and ready to serve not just the second district but every single person in this county. I want to thank CEO Miyasato and her team for the last For a long time, I've had some preparation for this job. I call it supervisor school. Done many, many meetings and gotten up to speed and thank you for the time that's taken. I feel really ready and fired up, ready to go. And ultimately, I just want to get off to a great start with my colleagues here who are all in partnership. And I have been religiously watching from home as you do your work up here And I can't wait to support the things that you really care about.
And I can't wait to improve what we do here for our county. I know that you share the belief, that I fervently believe that we're all up here because we're trying to make people's lives just a bit better and local government is absolutely the best way to do that. And I know that each and every one of you does that every day. And i can't wait to just join the team and thank you for having me.
0:03 – 1:467 turns
I should add that there will be a ceremony at the first of the year that we'll get to more celebratory. But now it's down to business, and the first item of business is the minutes from November 22nd and November 29th. May I have a motion?
So moved.
Second. Any discussion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Pass unanimously. CEO Miyasato do you have a report today? No report this morning chair.
Madam Chair, I believe it is time for closed session.
All right, I guess I had on my script that you were going to describe any changes to the agenda but we can go directly to closed session. County Council?
Thank You madam chair members of the board in closed session today we have one item of existing litigation under government code section 54956.9 And it's Bolthouse Land Company, LLC versus all persons claiming a right to extract or store groundwater in the Kiama Valley Groundwater Basin. It's in Los Angeles Superior Court and we also have public employee appointment under Government Code Section 54957 Agricultural Commissioner.
And that'll be about an hour and 15 minutes so I expect we'll be back somewhere in the window between 1015 and 1030. All right. Welcome to our December 6, 2022 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors here in the Santa Barbara Hearing Room. As you can see we've got our full complement of supervisors up here. The governor appointed Supervisor Capps to her position she was sworn in yesterday there will be a celebration the first year when all the new Judges and various people elected take the oath of office, but we had important work to do and so she's on board now So with that we're returning from closed session County Council. Would you please report out?
1:46 – 1:487 turns
Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the Board. The board met in closed session on two items. The first is existing litigation, Bolthouse Land Company LLC versus All Persons claiming a right to extract or store groundwater in the Keoma Valley Groundwater Basin. And the second was public employee appointment for Agricultural Commissioner. The board took no reportable action.
Thank you. Madam Clerk,
do you have announcements for today? Chair Hartman and members of the Board, I do have a couple quick announcements this morning. A memo was received requesting that Administrative Item 25 be continued to January 24th, 2023. This can be added to the balance of the administrative agenda. For the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of the agenda. Please be advised that the Public Health Department is still strongly encouraging county staff and members of the public to mask and socially distance themselves in crowded areas.
Individuals that would like to provide a verbal public comment virtually may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. If you have any questions, please contact the Clerk of the Board's Office at 805-568-2240. That concludes my announcements for today.
Thank you. And do any board members want to pull any agenda items? I would like to pull A5.
Yeah, I was actually looking for a continuation on A9 and A25.
All right. So Madam Clerk, do we have any members of the public who'd like to pull any items?
Chair Hartman and members of the board we have two requests to speak on administrative item five. All right so would you read that into the record please? Chair Hartman and members of the board, administrative item number five is from the district attorney's office. It is to consider recommendations regarding an agreement with Serco Data Analytics LLC. This item requires a forfeits vote. CEO Miyasato?
1:48 – 1:5513 turns
Chair Hartman and supervisors in speaking to the department last night there is some changes we would like to make so we would like to withdraw the item and come back next week but if your board would still like to have questions on that you can entertain that. We have Mr. Soderman here from the DA's office and also Mag Nicola online.
All right, and I would like to let the two public members speak as well. Supervisor Williams do you want to speak before or after public comment?
I'll just express my question. My big one is why we wouldn't have a data and information from this integratable into our essentially system-wide Understanding of how well we are doing as an institution and as a justice system in representing all peoples.
I'll add my comment as well. Um, I had an opportunity to speak with our new IT director And he was talking in general about how important it is that as systems are developed Internally that they be able to communicate externally with other partners and so for me It would be really important that he have an opportunity to look at this system and see how well it does Interact interface with with other systems so
I'd just like to echo appreciation that this is going to be given more time. I looked through it and had a lot of questions, mostly speaking to the broader goal of this work especially as it fits into a lot of work that's happening with racial justice and I didn't quite see that in the materials thus far. I'd also like to know which other counties this consultant has worked with and how that's gone. I think it's really important to always have those benchmarks. I see it in other items and so I'd love Thank you. Supervisor Nielsen? Yes,
thank
you Chair Hartman. You know I got a chance to pull this item and call the District Attorney-Elect to talk to him a little bit about this and as we're all aware you know the DA's office has been asking for a couple budget cycles someone to help them with their data so that they can plug in to the whole system wide evaluation and dashboard. So I do think this isn't necessarily the solution for the entire criminal justice system when we take a look at it with that dashboard but it's definitely going to be the way I see is connection to get the information that we need from the DA's office and move it through the process to eventually integrate with the entire organization. So you know my questions were answered, I'm gonna likely be supportive of this if this comes back next week but that was my understanding
Yeah, and I would just like to piggyback on your we want systems where you enter data once. And maybe some of it is only appropriate for internal but to the extent again that it communicates well with other systems that were developing and that we have a process where it goes through our IT director I think is important.
I can't, Chair Hartman. My understanding is that they've been asking for an employee to do this for some time. They haven't been able to find that person or we haven't been able to get the funding. This is now just bringing in a contractor to do that, some outside organization. So it's solving a goal that we've been looking for for some time as what I see.
Thank you. All right. Public comment?
We will go to Zoom for Adrienne Gallivan to be followed by LaWanda Pruitt.
My name is Adrian Galvan. I'm a member of the Office of the Public Defender's Racial Justice Committee. The California Racial Justice Act of 2020, now codified as Penal Code Section 745 was passed with the legislative intent to remedy the stark reality that race pervades our system of justice Discrimination undermines public confidence in the fairness of our system of justice and deprives Californians of equal justice under law.
Through the Racial Justice Act, we no longer accept racial discrimination and racial disparities as inevitable in our criminal justice system. The Racial Justice Act makes clear that this discrimination and these disparities are illegal and will not be tolerated in Santa Barbara County, and the state of California. A United States Supreme Court justice has observed the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race, and to apply the Constitution with eyes open to the unfortunate effects of centuries of racial discrimination.
To that end, the Racial Justice Act was passed with the intent to ensure that individuals have access to all relevant evidence including statistical evidence regarding potential discrimination in seeking or obtaining convictions or imposing sentences. It is against this backdrop that the district attorney is now seeking funding to build an internal data dashboard without transparency or accountability.
Transparency on data collection and data sharing is crucial in being able to identify and focus on where the problems exist in our system, and how to address them in a meaningful way. We know that racial and ethnic disparities exist in our local criminal justice system. Black and Latino people are disproportionately arrested and incarcerated in Santa Barbara County.
Disparities exist in decisions about whether to book someone into custody, in decisions about whether someone is placed on pretrial supervision, and disparities in the types of sentences that are handed down to people The Office of the Public Defender's Racial Justice Committee is committed to ensuring transparency, equity and accountability. The Office of the District Attorney's budget revision request should be taken off an administrative calendar so there can be further robust comment and discussion.
Thank you for your time and attention this morning.
Next we'll move on to LaWanda Lyons-Pruitt, to be followed by Pam Flint Tambo.
1:55 – 2:018 turns
Good morning Chairman Hartman and Supervisors. LaWanda Lyons Pruitt representing the Santa Maria Lompoc branch of the NAACP. We are dismayed, disheartened, disappointed To see this item on the agenda and believe. This internal database request is contrary to your commitment to racial justice, especially after the May 25th 2020 brutal murder of George Floyd.
So just two and a half years later here we are and we want to go internal rather than being transparent. Interestingly, I googled this company and I found the exact template that is being presented to the board at classer.ca.gov. It is the exact same template. I think in the spirit of your commitment to racial justice Anything with internal is disingenuous.
It is not in sync with your commitment to racial justice, transparency, community equity and fairness. Penal Code 745 is about disparate treatment and to request an internal Our database implies that our district attorney and other district attorneys throughout California are going back to the playbook. We, the public deserves to know if race ethnicity and or national origin is the basis for conviction and or higher sentence An external database informs the public and is accessible. And we have no problem with an external database, we definitely have a problem with an internal database.
Penal Code 745 is about justice, something that we continue to wait on. Thank you.
Thank you. Our last speaker Pam Flint Tambo
Good morning, and thank you. Today I'm speaking for myself because there's not been a sufficient time to get approvals from the CLU Santa Barbara and the League of Women Voters Santa Barbara boards that we sometimes represent Seven of our collaborative work group met this morning and discussed our concerns with the DA's request for funding the Sekiro data analytics data dashboard. So I was really pleased to hear the comments that you made this morning, so I've scratched half of what I was going to say to you and say thank you. I think we need to take some time.
We've been working with a paid consultant to have our public safety departments better collaborate with each other for more than a year now. So this proposal seemed to be a move away from that process and back to those silos that we've talked about having in the past. We believe that it's important that data be shared with all public safety departments and the public And this is a national trend, so it's not something real unique in Santa Barbara. We're trying to keep up with the Joneses I guess around the country.
We believe right now that supporting this particular dashboard is a move in the wrong direction backwards not forwards. So we're pleased that you're planning to delay this request and perhaps wait until the consultant and all the public safety departments Have had the opportunity to review how this data dashboard will complement the other departments dashboards and provide a better information system for our community. And improve the criminal justice system we have in Santa Barbara County, so thank you.
Thank you.
Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have no further requests to speak supervisor Williams.
I just move that we table this for another date and look forward to the adjustments that the DA would do to this item, especially those in regards to its integration with our dashboard system as a whole for the county and transparency to the public.
So CEO Miyasato, we'll withdraw this. We don't have another date. Is that correct?
We can confer with the department to see what the date whether we can make next week or if there has to be changes to the contract and we can come back then not until January. But just I want to just on behalf of the district attorney's office and DA elect Sobernack, I don't think the intention was not to share the data. I think we worked for the department last night And additional language that we intend to add would be with completion of the analytics and dashboard, the DA's office will work collaboratively with other criminal justice partners on implementing an external facing integrated So I think that was always the intent, the first step was cleaning up their data. As far as to racial justice issues, I think Chief Deputy Magna Colla is on the line today or you can wait for Attorney-Elect, DA-Elect, sorry, Savarnak who could probably be at a future meeting unfortunately couldn't
2:01 – 2:0310 turns
I don't think we need anything more but my question really goes to a motion to withdraw or a motion to continue It's a motion to withdraw. Okay, and so I
think Motion to withdraw but I'd I think you know, I'm glad we're moving faster these days as an institution But I think this take will take more than a week So I you know that that I do would not view it as a positive thing to see this on the agenda next week
All right, so we have a motion may have a second Second. All in favor of withdrawing this motion to reconsider at a future date, say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. A-9 Madam Clerk.
Chair Hartman and members of the board, Administrative Item 9 is from the Planning and Development Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the GSR LLC new agricultural preserve contract Santa Maria Area 4th District. Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you Chair Hartman. I just pull this item and I'm actually asking for it to be continued to next week This is an act reserved contract in my district. It's The ownership is a successor to the Greco company and they're gonna be just decommissioning Some oil operations on the property. I want to understand that a little bit better before I move forward with The contract, I want to see how that potentially might impact the agriculture operations on that parcel.
And I know that often we're trying to get these Williamson Act contracts finished by the end of the year so I think just another week wouldn't hurt and I've talked to County Council and I think that's acceptable if I understand correctly.
Madam Chair, Supervisor Nielsen. Yes, that's correct
Okay,
so I think what we just need at this point then is We're going to pull a 25 I gather we still have we do we have to read that into the record or can? We just we're going to continue A9 and a25. I think we can just include that in the motion for the balance of the agenda So the motion would be then to continue A9 to December 13th and A24, A25 to January 24.
That's going to be my motion to approve the balance of the agenda with those continuations.
All right. May I have a second? All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion passes unanimously. That brings us to item A24. Madam Clerk, would you read that into the record please?
2:03 – 2:103 turns
Chair Hartman and members of the board, Administrative Item 24 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Deputy Chief Probation Officer Kimberly Sheen for over 10 years of dedicated service to the County of Santa Barbara and over 25 years of service to the justice system. Joining us here in person we have Kimberly Sheen and her family. If you will join us at the podium I will now read the resolution into the record Whereas Kimberly Sheen was born in Athens, Greece growing up in a variety of countries overseas and ultimately moving to California during her high school years. She attended California Lutheran University receiving a Bachelor's of Science degree in Administration of Justice. Deputy Chief Sheen went on to graduate with her Juris Doctor from Santa Barbara and Ventura College of Law and is a member of the State Bar.
And whereas she began her career in the field of probation with this Ventura County Probation Agency, serving in a variety of assignments during her 25 years. She played a key role in launching a recovery classroom program assisting youth to remain in their home and community While getting the treatment they needed. She joined the Santa Barbara County Probation Department in 2012 as a probation manager with oversight of the Santa Barbara Adult Division and in 2017 was promoted to Acting Deputy Chief Probation Officer, and in 2018 to Deputy Chief Probation Officer.
serving in the adult, juvenile and ultimately in the Juvenile Facilities Division. And whereas during her 35 years of service Deputy Chief Sheen worked to strengthen justice partner collaboration expanded housing and employment options for justice involved individuals launched the department's pre-trial assessment and supervision programs and expanded treatment opportunities for youth in custody Her goal of elevating community, family and justice-involved voices continued throughout her career.
And whereas Deputy Chief Sheen volunteered her time over a decade to Santa Clara Legal Aid and is looking forward to returning to this pro bono work in her retirement. She plans to teach at local community colleges, helping to share her experience and knowledge with those interested in the field of probation and community corrections. And whereas Deputy Chief Sheen is looking forward to spending more time with her wife Erin, son Leo, and going on road trips to visit daughter Cameron in the Bay Area. She is excited to assist in transitioning a new deputy chief into the department while continuing her work towards the implementation of a new commitment program to the Juvenile Justice Center.
Now, therefore be it ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Kimberly Sheen for over 35 years of dedicated service to the field of probation with the final 10 years to the citizens of Santa Barbara County and the Santa Barbara County Probation Department. And extend her best wishes for a fulfilling enjoyable and rewarding retirement passed and adopted today.
Chief Heitman.
Chair Hartman and supervisors. A little over 10 years ago as a Deputy Chief Probation Officer, I sat on an interview panel for probation manager and had the pleasure of interviewing Kim Sheehan. Kim was from Ventura County Probation Agency at the time and was looking for an opportunity to grow and develop her potential. And I was looking for a manager who could see criminal justice reform as an opportunity.
Brendan Bouchard once said, remember when you knock on the door of opportunity it is work who answers. I think I can safely say that was very true in Kim's case. Kim joined our team and from the start every opportunity was accompanied by a crazy amount of work. But Kim rose to the occasion and shared her passion and spirit of innovation with those she worked with.
Most notably, she saw the opportunity that Zero Bail presented during the early days of the pandemic and worked closely with the court and the other criminal justice stakeholders to utilize a newly implemented pretrial assessment and supervision program to assist the court during a challenging time while improving our local public safety outcomes. She also recognized the potential that leveraging housing options had for our clients. and partnered with HCD and other partners to expand and enhance housing opportunities that have made an incredible difference in the lives of so many.
She has proven herself to be fiercely loyal, dedicated, committed, and resourceful as well as calm in a storm. I think everyone would agree that the probation department in recent years has not been a place of calm and quiet and instead often involved stormy conditions We've worked through so, so many reform-driven changes to the law program modifications and funding streams and new initiatives. And Kim has been key to many of them.
She's worked long hours and capitalized on challenges ensuring that they were realized as opportunities with careful planning and creativity. And in the process she often found herself balancing our vision for implementation With the difficult realities of workload change fatigue and resource limitations. Kim understands that delicate balancing act. but she's also driven to improve and innovate.
She ensured that the department's mission to protect and serve were effectively balanced. With over 35 years of service, Kim has been an exceptional public servant who has embraced and understood that probation is all about opportunity and the balancing act between hope and accountability. I'm better for knowing Kim and having had the opportunity to work with her And yes, that opportunity sometimes involve more work on my part as well as hers.
I want to thank Kim's family, Aaron, Leo and Cameron for all the time that they shared her with us. And the many, many after hours calls that they endured. But most importantly, I want to thank him for all that she brought to our department, our community and our partnership. We would not have been able to accomplish so much with so little if it weren't for her tenacity and dedication. She is so very deserving of every opportunity that retirement can afford her.
2:10 – 2:144 turns
Thank you, Chief Heitman. First I'd like to thank your board and CEO Miyasato and her staff for the leadership and support for so many challenging justice related initiatives and legislative changes over the past years. I'd also like to acknowledge and thank our Justice Partner agencies and other county departments such as HCD, the chief had mentioned we've really done some excellent Launching new programs, initiatives and I'm really grateful for so many inspiring people and partnerships here in this county.
I'd also like to acknowledge and thank the men and women of our department for their engagement and dedication and continual flexibility. We ask a lot of them we ask a lot of you And you continuously step up and pivot, adjust and conform to numerous ways of legislative changes that significantly have changed how we do our work especially over the last few years. There are truly so many awesome bright smart caring officers and support staff in this department.
And so much gratitude to Tanya, Chief Heitman. Thank you for the opportunities I've learned so much from you this past decade and your mentorship and your friendship means so much. Thank you. My family, my parents who modeled work ethic and their amazing careers in public service My children Cameron and Leo for their love and understanding when I was running late or falling short.
And their patience in listening to the many many life lessons and cautionary tales I shared along the way. To my wife Erin for being my biggest champion and my softest critic. Thank you. This has been an amazing, fulfilling career. It's given so much to me. I've learned a great deal about people, about myself and also about privilege and access and gratitude and gratefulness. It's been an honor. Thank you.
One thing I've learned is that probation is a very tight knit family and I see some long faces out there. They're going to miss you, we all are. Supervisor Williams your light is on?
Yes, I just wanted to thank you not only for your years of service but the fact that you don't want to leave us behind. If you're going to move on to interest young people into a career in public safety it sounds to me like you want to stay part of the county and probation families and why I want to thank you so much for that.
All right. Turning to the next item on today's agenda, general public comment. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone who submitted a form to comment on items not on today's agenda but within our jurisdiction?
2:14 – 2:2910 turns
Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have no request to speak for general public comment.
All right, turning to departmental item number one. Would you read that
into the record please? Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding proposed county-wide fee adjustments for Santa Barbara County Parks and Services.
And Director Chaption? Sure. So we've read departmental item number one on county fee adjustments into the record and we're ready for Mr. Bailey going to introduce the team, Director Chapshin behind you.
Thank you Supervisor, members of the board. Yes my director George Japson is right behind me. Today he'll be hearing a presentation on our 2022 annual fee adjustment before we get started I want to thank Sherman Hansen and his team, Lynn Semenza, Susan Isbell, Vanessa Solis and Sharon Zertuchi for the good work on this. I also have Park Superintendent Jeffrey Lindgren up here and I will hand it over to Sherman Hanson who's got nearly 30 years of Parks He has over 30 years of parks operational and administration experience. So Sherman, you're up.
Thank you, Ryder. Good morning Chair Hartman and members of the Board. As Ryder said we are here today to discuss community services parks division recommendation for fee modifications. Today we're asking that your board adopt a resolution adjusting county park fees for special events, day use park facilities, aquatic programs and camping fees. And also the establishment of some new fees which is our resolution and also determine if the resolution is exempt from CEQA per the statutes listed above.
We were last before your board in December of 2019 to update park fees and as we know things changed in March of 2020 with the pandemic shutdown which closed both our campgrounds in April and May of 2020, which is the main source of parks revenues. However, upon reopening we've seen record number of visitors for these last two and a half years. And as Ryder mentioned I started with the parks in 1990 and I've never seen the parks this busy so what that tells us is that we were able to capture new customers and hold on to them.
What we've seen is while Halama always remains strong, Kachuma Tent and RV sites off season occupancy levels have increased between 10%-30%. And the cabins have also seen an increase of 20 to 40% at Kachuma. Despite the fact we've not adjusted our fees for the past three years, we do benchmark fees annually. This is the first time in three years that we've actually seen other benchmarking agencies start to adjust their fees.
Some of our other agencies we benchmark against are the County of Ventura, the County of San Luis Obispo, California State Parks, the City of Santa Barbara and as well as some of the private parks in our areas. Out of the approximate 200 fees that we have, staff is recommending we update 73 of them which means relieving about 127 unchanged. We're recommending to increase 64 fees which is primarily in our camping parks. The establishment of two new fees for our North County athletic field usage and also the elimination of seven fees.
Parks fees help to offset the operational cost of our county parks and facilities. Parks Division generates approximately 46% of its operating fees from charges for service. As you can see from the chart up there, it's about $8 million. Of that 8 million, approximately 7 million is camping fees and then an additional 1 million from our day use group areas and special events.
The charges also show we receive $1.7 million in concession revenues, which makes up about 10% of our budget and is mostly driven by our restaurant concessions, Hooked Cafe at Kachuma Lake, the Halama Beach Store, the Boathouse Restaurant in Roroboro, and we're hoping to soon be open Elwood at Goleta Beach. Our general fund contribution is approximately 23 percent or 3.9 million So if you look at it this way for every 1 million in general fund revenue received Park generates more than $2 and I'm sorry every one dollar general fund revenue parks generates more than two dollars in charges for service or concession fees Parks also receives an additional $2.5 million in earmarked maintenance funding, which I'd like to thank the board for as someone who spent many years out in the field.
When I first started we'd actually use nails so now it's nice to be able to actually do some very large maintenance projects. So we appreciate that funding. As noted in a previous slide, we are recommending updating approximately 70 fees. These next few slides will highlight some of these recommended changes. Staff would also like to point out that we are not recommending any changes to our day-use large group areas as these facilities are used mostly by local residents as an economical way to enjoy our parks.
In this slide, we note fees to our sports fields for Waller and Orchard Community Park. Staff is now recommending a tiered fee schedule for field usage as there's more demand due to traveling teams and just the growth in North County. The new policy gives preference to the local youth and sports groups. And allows us to take into consideration field usage as we know 8 or 9 year olds practicing soccer for an hour do not have the same impact as an adult game on a Sunday afternoon.
Staff, we also would like to recommend establishing tournament fees and then security posits for groups just to make sure that they have a little stake in the game for using the fields. We do not anticipate any significant revenue increase. This is more of a policy change for us. We now have a written use policy and we also do not anticipate any increased cost to our local youth sports.
The slide also notes a decrease in our junior card fees. Due to the program being shortened from a three-week program to two-week program, this better aligns with what other County Junior Guard programs are on the South Coast. Our staff has noticed over the last few years that even though the participants sign up for three weeks, most of them do not attend all three weeks of the session due to family obligations. This will also allow us to our junior guards usually are more or junior guard instructors usually more experienced guards. This will give them an opportunity to get the newer guards on and get them trained for the beaches in the pools before they jump into the junior guard program.
This slide shows recommended changes to Cochuma Lake Recreation Area. Staff is recommending to increase camping fees on 10-15% on average With exceptions, the extra vehicle overnight fee going from $10 to $15. Staff is also recommending the elimination of the pet entry fee as benchmarking showing that many campgrounds are moving away from a pet fee. Staff is also recommending reservation fees be increased from $8 to $10 as this better aligns with benchmarking research and also helps offset the cost of our online reservation system and credit card processing fees.
Staff is estimating these fees will increase revenues by approximately $470,000. This next slide continues to show recommended changes to Kachuma fees. Staff is recommending to eliminate the off-season rate for cabins, as the last two years demand for cabins at Kachuma remained strong in the off season and currently occupancy rates in the off season are similar to those of Halama which does not have an off-season rate.
Staff has also recommended increase the group camping fees by a minor amount. These fees have not been raised since 2015. Finally, staff is recommending to eliminate the daily and yearly RV storage fees and increase the monthly fee to $90. Benchmarking research shows average monthly fee between 90 and a hundred dollars. And for the past two years has actually been a waiting list so we have not been able to even use the daily fee. Benchmarking also shows no other facility offers a yearly discount and our online payment software actually does not support a yearly discounted fee. So it turns in from a online process to a manual process because staff has to go in and override to enter the yearly fee.
We estimate these changes will increase revenues by about $46,000 per year. This next slide shows staff is recommending updates to Halama Beach fees not pictured in this slide but similar to Kachuma staff is recommending the extra vehicle overnight fee go from 10 to 15 dollars and also the elimination of the pet day use As with Kachuma, the staff is recommending the single-family campsite fees be increased by 10 to 15 percent and cabin fees be increased by 5 percent.
As with Kachuma, the group camping fees have not been updated since 2015 so we are recommending an increase of abalone point fee to $300 given its close proximity to the water and starfish code be increased to 275 per night. We estimate that updates in these fees will produce approximately $150,000 in revenues. Our final slide about fee changes, staff is recommending to increase the courthouse garden wedding fees from $900 to $1,000 per wedding and the mirror room fee from $400 to $500.
Even with these two increases, these two wedding venues are still among the least expensive in the county. I'd also like to give a shout out to our special events team. The wedding venues at the courthouse have been named the top wedding venue for two years in a row in Santa Barbara. During this shutdown, we went from zero revenues to now we're back up to 300-400 weddings per year and about $300,000 in revenue and the special events last fiscal year 21-22 brought in almost $550,000 from zero the year before so big shout out to our special events Staff is also recommending we increase the Lompoc Veterans venue fees from 400 to 600 for the auditorium and 200 through here for the bank room. These fees now mirror the other two similar facilities in the Lompoc Valley.
As noted earlier, the Parks Division still needs general fund dollars to maintain current levels of operation. While staff estimates the proposed fee adjustment will generate an additional $700,000 per year it will still not meet the county's full cost recovery policy as a department has determined that to set fees at full cost recovery would be cost prohibitive to the public.
We did present this to the Park Commission on October 27th, and they unanimously recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the fee adjustments. If approved today, the new fees will take effect January 4th, 2023. Thank you for your time, and Ryder and I or Jeff are available to answer any questions you might have.
Supervisor Nelson?
Yes, thank you Chair Harmon. First I just wanted to acknowledge that it seems like the maintenance You know some people are always concerned about that, but it really has been an investment because we've seen our facilities used at a greater rate which is bringing in additional income. So I just want to kind of get a pitch out there for maintenance because you know in the past some of our facilities were pretty dilapidated and so people wouldn't necessarily want to travel And so even though it's not sexy, maintenance can have a return on investment and we're seeing there in our parks department. So I wanted to just really acknowledge that and the leadership of the Parks Department and the board to continue to invest in our deferred maintenance backlog especially within our parks because it impacts so many of our neighbors and our communities as well as our visitors.
I wanted to reiterate or make sure I heard it right these proposed changes will not impact the fees that are currently charged for youth sports programs
Yes, that is correct. Basically what we have done now is we have a written policy on field usage but we're not planning on increasing the fees we charge our local sports groups that use those fields.
Thank you. And the reason why I'm asking that is in part because I don't think cost recovery should be the goal of parks, right? We're trying to bring up, you know, everybody pays their taxes. Those should go towards quality-of-life investments like parks and so I don't think that should necessarily be the goal of parks is for cost recovery. You know we obviously need to cover costs and address those needs The cost recovery I don't think should be the same kind of goal it is in other parts and other services that we offer, especially since parks are often something that's available to those who don't have a lot. I used to be a teacher in Lompoc and when I always ask on the first day of school where everybody went for the summer? I was always shocked that most of the kids in the Lompoc Valley that I taught never left Santa Barbara County.
So it's really important for many of our families to be able to access and utilize our parks facilities, especially in Lompac Valley And I'm always a proponent for under-incorporated areas, and you know we don't have rec departments. You know people ask me about county parks and rec. I go that's a misnomer. We have county parks I believe the only rec program we have is the Junior Lifeguards. Other than that, we provide the facilities but we rely on our schools and our non-profits to come around and support our unincorporated areas unlike our municipal locations so I'm a big fan of the work that you're doing. I am concerned though about the fee increase in what it's saying here that it's offset expenses. You showed us the revenue picture, I didn't see the expense picture and so is there an anticipated deficit?
What are we looking at there? Are these funds really If it's offsetting costs, I have an issue with that potentially. If it's to reinvest, that's a whole other discussion and so I want to make sure I hear from you about how it's being presented to us at the board because I didn't see what our projected expenses are for next year. It may be too soon but that was unclear. The other question, and I'm sure you guys will get to as well is the KPMG report. You guys are in process with that and what efficiencies and cost-saving measures that we might see out of that that might cover some of these expenses So I'm trying to appear, you know, I'm not a big fan of raising fees.
And so it's gotta be a business case that I can go out and defend to my constituents. And you guys have given me a lot of good information and a lot of good reasons but I'm not quite there yet. So I need some more if I'm gonna be able to support these fees.
2:29 – 2:3620 turns
Supervisor Nielsen to the chair. It is a little bit early in the budget development process. I've been doing these fees, we've been doing these fees since at least 2015 together and during the budget process you know the first thing we tackle is our organic S&B salary benefit growth So we're looking at every year as part of the budget process, a $300,000 to $400,000 deficit right off the bat. This is just to pay the same folks from the prior year for rising costs. Raises, COLAs, salaries and benefits retirement costs. That doesn't include any other cost of increasing supplies, toilet paper, rakes, nails. I'm sure we can really get in the weeds on that.
That's a high-level quick picture of our offsetting expenses. So it is a little early in the budget process, but these fees are really important to kind of help offset that predictable expense growth. You also had a question about the KPMG report. We are working on that. I believe you'll have a report back to the board sometime early next year, but I'm not sure of the exact date
And if I could continue, so that's where I'm struggling here. If this was to, we were raising fees to reinvest back into our park system. It's a different sales pitch to me than just raising fees to cover those types of expenses, the ongoing expense, especially when we should first be looking at a KPMG report is what are efficiencies can we get in the organization so that we might be able to reduce costs or address some of those concerns? So I know it's a big picture that we're all looking at but those are my concerns.
Supervisor Williams and then Lavinino.
Yeah, I'll just say that I support raising fees particularly on camping for a whole other reason besides the question of cost recovery and maintenance. And that is to preserve access when you have something that's so cheap it advantages people who are retired or from outside the area to be able to book those spots especially when you have a system where you can book ahead of six months when you are part of a continuous booking.
So if you are trying to book Halama, good luck. If you do it on the very first day, most of the part on a weekend, most of the spots will already have been taken and that is something that exists when you do not price things high enough to preserve access for working people so ironically the prices are so low that somebody who's got a job That during the week, can't get a booking.
And I can only tell you because from experience. I literally sit there six months ahead of time, boom, boom, boom day by day to try to get a camping spot and so it is- There
are no perks being a supervisor. Right.
It is something that is also true of the state park system. It's a real weakness in the state park system, but I think particularly at LLAMA we should be doing this so that it's an asset for local people and not just a gem for people from out of town to vacation at.
Supervisor Labanino?
Thank you Madam Chair. I was, is there any public comment on this first? I'm just curious.
Chair Hartman and members of the board we have one request to speak on this item.
All right, I'll wait till after public.
Supervisor Kaps.
Thank you, Chair Hartman. I love our county parks. I've been a fan all of my life and I'm just grateful that this is the first departmental issue I get to speak to because thank you for the work that you do. I appreciate the thoughtfulness of the presentation especially the benchmarking. You'll hear this as a refrain from me. I really want to know what other counties are doing and I thought the extensiveness by which the benchmarks were included in this presentation was very persuasive as to why we should be raising these fees Second point is I really appreciate the fact that the emphasis is not on day use because that's really what locals used predominantly. I have appreciated Supervisor Williams' experience with camping, I've had the same but yet day use?
I just was at, I rented Goleta Beach not too long ago. I think I shared this when we met and It was such an incredible bargain. Ranger came and checked on us so clean, the bathrooms are excellent. So you've made a good case to me. I'm curious a little bit about how frequently our fees have been raised? What was the last time in which the fees have been raised? I didn't see that sort of context. That's part one. Part two is how do these increases get communicated to the public So that people aren't caught off guard if they've been planning their camping trip, et cetera.
Supervisor Capps to the Chair. The last time we raised fees was December of 2019. We benchmark every year but it's been my experience probably every two to three years we'll see an increase. In 2019 the board did grant us permission to raise just camping fees which is just the RVs, and the cabins based on a CPI index, but we still benchmark before we even consider that. We do put notifications out to the public that the fees were going to be at the board today. We will also send out an email blast to our constituents because of things like if it is approved, the trailer storage fees going up to allow folks an opportunity to see if they want to move their vehicle or if you know they still have a chance to pay the yearly until January 4th so maybe they want to jump in and pay the yearly one last time.
Thank you. I had a couple of questions the first day. I know some time ago we implemented a reduced fee for county parks for veterans and I just want to make sure that's still in effect
Yes, Chair Hartman. We have our annual pass discount is $10 for veterans and the last that was 2018 I think we instituted it and I think I checked a couple weeks ago and we're averaging somewhere between four to five hundred annual passes a year for veterans
It's terrific. The other question, you mentioned that the fees are going up at the Lompoc Veterans Memorial and is there a preference for veterans when they're renting it for their purposes?
Yeah, Chair Hartman, the veterans actually get to use the building for free if they're having a veteran sponsored event.
And what about if it's not a veteran's event, but it's a veteran maybe getting married or sadly maybe it's a memorial service. Are there any discounts for veterans in that context?
Yeah, it would be the same if it is a veteran. Unfortunately we've had a few funerals lately for veterans and those are free.
Okay, wonderful. And my final question is when people stay overnight at Kachuma or at Halama do they pay TOT? Is that part of the fee?
2:36 – 2:439 turns
Supervisor or Chair no they do not pay TOT. Bingo there we go Lake stays. That's our new thing right?
Okay oh Director Chapchin
Thank you, Chair Hartman. Just an important question that Supervisor Nelson did ask about KPMG. We are working with KPMG but none of their recommendations really addresses efficiencies. I think they found that we were efficient in our operations. It's more collaboration, more working with more community groups other than that really the parks findings weren't significant.
And Madam Clerk public comment? Chair Hartman and members of the board we have one request to speak. We'll go to Kathleen Rosenthal on Zoom
Can you all hear me? We can loud and clear.
Okay, well good morning supervisors and especially good morning and welcome to Supervisor Capps we're so glad to have you join the board. My name is Kathleen Rosenthal I represent our coalition Save Santa Barbara Equestrian Trails and the Santa Ynez Valley Riders up here in the Santa Ynez Valley. I wanted to first preface my comments by saying how helpful The park staff has been helping me understand the fee increases and also somewhat of the parks budget and stuff. It's been very eye-opening. I had sent a letter to you summarizing in particular equestrian uses in surrounding counties, and what the surrounding counties have as far as facilities for equestrians.
One of the ideas that we have been raising with the park staff is the possibility of a horse camp at Live Oak Camp at Kachuma. Right now, I had also submitted some photos of unfortunately an illegal trail that had been cut out at Kachuma through the San Ynez Riverbed during both festivals and I have to tell you our volunteers tried to make this trail less of an attractive nuisance over the summer and we obliterated the trail And then you can see it, how it came back following the reggae on the mountain festival just last month. And we find this very unfortunate and we'd like to work closer with the parks staff out there to ensure this doesn't become like a braided trail system through the creek bed and destroy that the waterfowl habitat that's out there.
There are actually comprehensive excuse me conservation element policies that protect this particular area for wild excuse me waterfowls Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting So we hope that in the future there will be a broadening of and consideration of different types of uses out there. A horse camp is very portable, they can be set up and taken down depending on what is going on out there.
And we would welcome an opportunity to work with park staff to make that happen. So I hope you'll learn from the summary put out regarding the surrounding counties and what they're doing with equestrian uses and their promotion of equestrian uses. We believe that anything that goes on out there also needs to be supported by advertising and publicity, which we hope will be coming in the future for at least the equestrian experience at Live Oak Trail. So thank you all very much for the opportunity to speak this morning and thank you again to park staff for doing such a great job.
Thank you Supervisor Lavenita.
I was just going to say first off in the staff report, very well done. And I also always appreciate not just percentages but the actual dollar amount because sometimes if you're moving it from $10 to $13, the percentage sounds like a lot and it's not a whole heck of a lot so I appreciate you guys having both those on there and please keep it that way. It's a lot easier to read it that way.
For me, I understand what Bob is saying. It is a reinvestment even if it is salaries and benefits because the guy that's actually there is the one doing the work. I don't think I've ever seen Kachuma in better condition when I take my kids to the park, my grandkids, my kids. It's hard to get a 40-year-old to go down the slide. I take my grandkids, we drive by four or five city parks to get to Waller Park. That's their favorite one to go to and it's in excellent condition.
I think people vote with their pocketbook and with their feet. And that, uh, I think they're telling us that it's fair and reasonable. And when I look at these costs, even though they are going up, um, there's still well within the range. And I think most people, um are more interested in them when they get to the park, they want to see it well maintained, well run.
And, uh I think just for the fact that you can tell by what our how hard, how difficult it is to get a, To get a reservation that we're doing a good job. So I appreciate, I'll be able to support this.
For myself, I just wanted to appreciate Ms. Rosenthal's research that she's done in the submission. I would note that although she says there is only one equestrian hiker trail in the county for equestrians and for Hikers it is the 3,000 acre live oak site. So that's a big chunk of our whole county system But I did want to voice my support for the idea of a horse camp and I think she's done some good benchmark research here for us that most other counties do have that and And that is a highly desirable area. I Mr. Lindgren, is there anything you'd like to comment on about that?
2:43 – 2:456 turns
Thank you, Chair Hartman. Just quickly, Live Oak Camp is available to be rented by equestrians if they so desire. So it had historically been rented by several different equestrian organizations who now have their own facilities so they no longer rent it but Live Oak Camp itself is available for that purpose. I'm going to give you a little bit of background on this.
A project that was outlined in the Bureau of Reclamation's Recreation Resource Management Plan for Cochuma Lake to build a specific campground for equestrians. So, that is still something we are looking at and then we're also looking at this through the Countywide Recreation Master Plan what the opportunities are for equestrian recreation And I will just add one more thing.
As we do with all of our trail and recreation related projects, we're always looking at open access so our trails should be open to multiple users. That includes equestrians. So we go to great lengths working with private developers to create parking for equestrian trailers, create specific types of crossings across concrete driveways and roadways to support equestrians and trying to make sure that all of our trails are designed and suitable for all user groups.
Thank you so much. So we're back to the board. I don't see any more lights, may I have a motion?
I'll make a motion to approve staff recommendation. I'll second.
And Supervisor Nelson would you like a roll call vote? All right Madam Clerk.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion to approve staff recommendation. I'll second. And Supervisor Nelson would you like a roll call
Show transcript
Motion passes 4-1 All
right, let me just do a check. I think we could just keep moving. All right, Madam Clerk would you read departmental item number two into the record please?
2:45 – 3:0317 turns
Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number two is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the 2022 annual report and accomplishments in the county's federal and state legislative advocates and adoption of the 2023 legislative platform.
Welcome Miss McGinty.
Good morning, Chair Hartman and members of the board. Thank you for having us today. Today we are going to present on the 2023 legislative platform and also ask and have our federal advocates as well as our state advocates give an update on the 2022 annual report. So to start off our presentation, we are going to have Don Gilchrist from Thomas Walterson Associates give the federal update.
Welcome, Mr. Gilchrist. Great to see you in person.
Thank you very much. Great to see all of you. Uh, thank you for the chance to speak to you this morning about your, this afternoon about your federal platform just for the record again, Don Gilchrist with Thomas Walters and Associates. And if we're talking about outcomes for 2022, we have to start out by acknowledging that Congress is struggling to complete legislative business in a lame duck session and there are numerous Bills that are in play for potential consideration here at the end of the year.
Everything ranging from a potential mental health care package to immigration reform, to pandemic money and preparedness issues and everything that you can imagine in between issues just keep popping up. But the main thing is completing the appropriations process, and that has been a big part of our lobbying for the county in 2022. The FY22 bills were completed in March.
That's five months late since the fiscal year starts on October 1. And for the first time in over 10 years those appropriations bills included Member projects that were designated by members of the House and the Senate. And Representative Carbajal was able to provide funding for two county projects in that bill, the Santa Barbara Veterans Memorial Building and the Lompoc Health Clinic.
And of course now the FY23 bills are the main thing as we try to finish up the current appropriations for this fiscal year. Again, there are projects in there for the county. Representative Carbajal has been able to insert funding for the San Marcos Road Stabilization Project as well as for the Orchid Library project and those are in the house versions of the bills and we're working to see if we can get them to be retained as Congress finishes up the legislation for appropriations.
Apart from appropriations, this was a big year for the county's clean energy priority and that was achieved when President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act. That included $369 billion for clean energy and climate change mitigation. Certainly this is the most aggressive climate investment that Congress has ever done and that was a big accomplishment and one of your top priorities.
We have been able to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act and expand those programs. And as I said, we're hoping to finish up other bills here at the end of the year. If we could advance to the next slide please? Just really briefly talking about next year, we have to acknowledge we're moving back into divided government territory. And so it will be a little bit different year apart from the normal partisan division, the leadership in the Republican Party and the House and the Senate is weakened due to challenges from within and that's going to make legislating very interesting, very complicated next year.
We will certainly see congressional Republicans pushing back on some of the federal spending initiatives, trying to show more restraint in the area of spending. They've made clear they're going to do aggressive oversight of the Biden administration But President Biden will continue to have enormous influence through the implementation of programs, through executive actions that he can take.
Talking about things like the bipartisan infrastructure legislation and the Inflation Reduction Act those are on the books and will be implemented for the infrastructure law we're moving into year two of that five-year program and so those grant opportunities will continue to be something that we pay very close attention to work with your county staff on But no doubt it's going to be an interesting year next year. The federal process is always chaotic and unpredictable, and it will certainly continue to be so next year.
So I'll just conclude by saying I look forward to continuing to work with you to implement the platform that you're going to adopt today.
And any questions for Mr. Gilchrist? Apparently not. I saw Supervisor Williams, I wasn't
sure. Issue in wanting to understand, I know it's both a lobbying at the state and federal level on this. It's essentially as I understand it too so that the State of California can get a waiver from the Federal requirements for the IND exclusion because right now we can only have The 16 beds at the Puff and every other facility can only get 16 beds that are reimbursed because of this sort of arbitrary idea that these facilities should be 16 beds or under.
And just as hit me home, You know, talk to somebody in the ER yesterday and just you know we continue to have folks that probably should be in the PUF hanging out at the ER for terminal offices. So I just want to highlight that
need.
Supervisor Nielsen?
Yeah, I don't really have a question. I just, I guess I have a comment that you know, I just want to publicly express my appreciation for Congressman Carbajal and the work that he and his staff do to really work with the different jurisdictions in the county and the district to make sure that, you know, that he spreads his representation and his advocacy across many, many different communities with many needs. Everybody's got their hand out looking for help and everybody thinks You know, federal government is the solution. I think they judiciously go through the applications or the proposals from the various jurisdictions and I'm not just saying that as someone who potentially is getting some for our community but you know it really has he's done a great job and so you know partisanship aside I think Salud and his team is representing this well up there in making sure that some of these allocations of funds are coming back to the taxpayers here in Santa Barbara County.
So just wanted to publicly acknowledge that
If I might add, money for the Orchid Library helps our whole library system. Supervisor Lavanino?
Well thank you Madam Chair and now we've got to turn this into a...I have to do my part because I don't think anybody's gotten more than Guadalupe in the last go-round so thank you for all your help on that and Congressman Carbajal's team on that as well. It doesn't take a lot of money in a small community to make a big difference, but he has delivered. I would probably have to say tens of millions of dollars just in this last year there and it is going to change that community so thank you.
Alright Miss McKinty?
Yes, thank you so much. Thank you Don for the update and now we will turn it over to Cliff Berg with governmental advocates on zoom to give our state annual report.
Thank you, Jasmine. Can everybody hear me OK?
We can
thank you, Supervisor. And I did want to congratulate Supervisor Capps on our appointment by the governor to the board and want to thank the governor's office for working closely with the county on making that happen. You know, the California legislature concluded the twenty one twenty two legislative session on August thirty first of this year. It was the end of a two year legislative session The governor finished action on over 900 bills by the end of September.
This year, he vetoed approximately 14% of those bills. It's the highest total as governor since his becoming governor and was as many bills veto this year is the last two years combined. The major reason the governor cited for his vetoes was concern regarding the fiscal outlook for the state of California And the impact on the state budget, an issue that continues to be under discussion.
As we look back at the California legislative session this year started in a crazy COVID lockdown in which members were limited and public was limited access to the building and committee hearings were limited. We moved by April into a limited accessibility right now Back to operating a normal, although the legislature has moved out of the state capital other than for meetings in the chambers and is moved to what we call the swing space three blocks away while they reconstruct the state capitol in Sacramento. We began the year with a state budget provided by the governor in January of 2022. Over the course of the year, that spending plan grew to over $300 billion by the end of August and included early action items on COVID, included a budget agreement by the legislature, a budget agreement with the governor in July and many more budget trailer bills Enjoyed a $90 billion state budget surplus in the past year, which allowed the governor and legislature to put substantial amounts of money into climate change affordable housing homelessness drought relief.
And provide over $11 billion in tax rebates to California motorists to lessen the impact of the high price of gasoline as well as hundreds of million dollars for reproductive rights for Those wanting to use a reproductive health care system. We provided you I think over it with over a 51 page report on issues and bills and budget items that impact the county that we either track for the county engage in behalf of the county or work Or worked on the slide that you have before you just provides a sort of diverse sample of the many complex issues that impact the county at the state level in California. I want to take the opportunity at the moment to thank Senator Lamone and her staff, Assemblyman Bennett and his staff I would like to thank the Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham and his staff for their commitment to the county and how closely they work with the county as well as all of the many department heads in the county and the County Administrator's Office for supporting the program at Sacramento and working with us closely without going into too much detail.
You know, the county was impacted and continues to be impacted on a regular basis by natural disasters and emergencies whether they be fire or wildfires. We work with the state of California on emergency declarations in providing state assistance. Um we've worked continuously over all the past couple years to push the administration to increase transportation funding uh particularly for local bridges um Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the Board of Supervisors. I would like to start by saying that the care court was a significant issue in the state budget this year as well as in terms of legislation. The governor's initial proposal created a number of substantial concerns upon the part of the county and local government work closely with CSAC and other stakeholders to ensure 1737 would have created onerous requirements on the county in terms of inspection and enforcement related to children's camps.
We secured amendments along with other stakeholders to that bill, ultimately the bill did not pass. 2201 Assemblyman Bennett worked with us very closely on a groundwater sustainability bill addressed a number of concerns we continue to work with him Replacement wells and other issues ultimately due to the complex nature of the issues involved in concern from other stakeholders. The bill was put on hold, expected to be back next year.
2538 was a bill related to state warming center and requiring counties provide notifications and other requirements on counties that were unduly burdensome. Bill was held 2724 we work very closely when I want to thank Assemblyman, or Supervisor Hartman for working with us very closely on that legislation to ensure that the Governor's Kaiser Initiative did not negatively impact the county and the county healthcare delivery system as well as Senator Lamona in her office who was on the Senate Health Committee and worked with us very closely on amendments on that bill.
Senator Cortese's bill related to this time period in which employers have to deny liability we were very concerned with failed passage Mr. Hertzberg, Senator Hertzberg's bill on emergency medical services would have had a major significant impact upon the county and overturned County authority in case law that county has exercised for years failed passage worked closely with Senator Lamone and supported her dimension care navigator grant pilot program which unfortunately the governor vetoed due to cost concerns Had substantial concerns about SB 867 Laird, which related to requirements related to sea level rise and empowered the Coastal Commission to exercise substantial and new jurisdiction over local government. Secured amendments to address those concerns that the bill ultimately was vetoed by the governor due to concerns were closely on food carts SB 972 1030 and 2931, cleanup and dealing with safety issues regarding pipelines in the county.
Work closely with the administration in the county secure funding that we placed in the budget for cleanup of the venticle pipeline. All of those issues just give you a sort of a diverse feel for the overall nature of various issues that impact the county. The California legislature reconvened yesterday banged the gavel and commenced The 22-23 legislative session, elected leadership sworn the new members that were elected in November. The biggest takeaway I think in terms of the new legislature is the number of new members that we will have due to substantial numbers of members choosing not to run for reelection as a result of term limits COVID and reapportionment.
The legislature has now gone in recess And we'll return January 4th, the governor will provide a state budget by January 10th. Issues of concern regarding the state budget continue to grow. The State Legislative Analysts provided a report in November which indicated a potential $25 billion shortfall in state revenues as a result of revenues coming in below projections.
Do not believe that that is any final estimate and that We will continue to monitor that closely to determine whether those numbers increase, decrease. It's a fluid situation at the moment. The legislative analysts basically described it as a problem not a crisis but we will see how the overall budget situation develops that will determine whether there is an opportunity for member what we call The state-level member requests at the federal level earmarks.
The legislature also banged the gavel yesterday on the governor's special session in which the governor has called upon the state legislature to pass legislation addressing windfall profits, he describes it as windfall profits in the oil industry while the legislative special session has convened. It is not clear yet where the legislature will go on the governor's proposals.
And the budget process itself will continue out through what we call the May revise when the State Department of Finance recalculates revenues and expenditures. I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have regarding the past year or the upcoming year in Sacramento. Thank you all.
3:03 – 3:1612 turns
Thank you, so do board members have any questions? Supervisor Nelson.
Yes, thank you chair Hartman. I'm just gonna take this opportunity also just to think My assemblyman Cunningham that has just recently retired and moved back into the private sector I thought Jordan's service to northern Santa Barbara County was great He showed what working across the aisle can do And by as somebody that was in the minority party getting a lot of legislation passed in his time at Sacramento helping the residents of California and of the 35th District on issues of infrastructure, human trafficking, protection of children online. I think he was a great champion for families and his service will be missed looking forward though to us being served by of course our former colleague Greg Hart from here on out.
Any other comments?
So Ms. McKinney. Yes, thank you so much. All right. So in addition to hearing the 2022 annual reports from our state and federal advocates we would also like to ask the board today to adopt the 2020-23 county legislative platform So just a quick overview of the Legislative Program Committee. This is a standing subcommittee of the Board of Supervisors and it includes two supervisors. We meet on a monthly basis and those meetings are open to the public. That committee is briefed on pending legislation of interest to the county, and we provide continuous status and advocacy updates To advance the county principles. So the committee reviews and reviews the draft 2023 platform and recommends moving to the Board of Supervisors so the legislative platform contains prioritized legislative principles specific issues Projects and programs that warranted targeted advocacy for the year funding requests and legislation once approved advocacy strategies are used to advance those principles and links The legislative principles that we have identified, they did not change for the 2023 year.
Although last year we did add one on diversity equity and inclusion. We have eight different principles which you can see it on the board there and those serve as a guide for the county in developing a position in any forthcoming state or federal legislation. This is just a quick overview of the legislative platform development process. So in August of September each year, we send out the legislative principles and planks to the departments and ask them to update those if any changes need to occur. And this is also where we identify any new planks for consideration for the upcoming year.
In October of each year, the Legislative Program Committee reviews the draft platform and we ask for input on that. And at the same time, we solicit input from the public and we sent out an e-blast as well as posted to the website and released a press release to ask for any feedback on the platform. In November, the Legislative Program Committee reviews the draft and we recommend submittal to the full Board of Supervisors which brings us where we are today and today staff is recommending the adoption of the 2023 legislative platform which will be effective January 1st of 2023 So these are just a few highlights for the 2023 ledge platform and some of the changes that did occur.
Some recommendations that we got from the legislative program committee was to modify the parks and open space plank, which we did as well as add an advancement of women and children's plank into the platform. Additionally, we did solicit public feedback and that on and we sent it out. Excuse me The e-blast press release and posted to our website and we received one one member of the public Comments and we added some minor changes in language to the Brown Act plank to address those This year we have six new planks for consideration.
Cannabis Federal Coordination, Broadband Infrastructure and Funding, Inpatient Administrative Day Payment Structure, IMD Inclusion, Care Court Implementation Efforts and Emergency Response Preparedness, Recovery and Resiliency. Two of those are from the County Executive Office. One is from the Office of Emergency Management and three are from a collaboration between the Behavioral Wellness and County Executive Office.
So with those changes, today staff is recommending the board receive and file an update on the annual reports for state and federal advocates as well as adopt the 2023 legislative platform and find that the proposed actions do not constitute a project within the meaning of CEQA. So with that, Don, Cliff, myself, as well as departments are available for any questions you may have. Thank you so much.
And do any board members have questions on the ledge platform? Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you, Chairman. You know sometimes there's letters that are sent from the Ledge Committee advocacy directly and then there's some items that come to the Board of Supervisors. Can you help me on what the difference is and what's that criteria?
Absolutely, so if there is a bill of pending legislation that impacts the county We if it fits within our legislative platform and it falls under one of the planks or principles that we identified then we send the planks Excuse me. We send advocacy letters directly If it doesn't fall within our platform Then we take it to the ledge committee first for consideration which then moves to the full board for consideration
Supervisor caps
Thank you, Chair Hartman. I'd like to take the opportunity to thank Mr. McGinty as well as Mr. Berg and CEO Miyasato for the effort with the governor's office to make sure that I was sitting here today so thank you. And I just want to particularly thank Chair Hartman and Supervisor Williams for the work on this legislative work it's obviously extremely important. I paid particular notice to attachment D which is the emphasis on Women and girls and appreciate the addition of the advocating for additional family leave I'm excuse me Family leave and also permanently extending the child tax credit. It's extremely important to our county We still have extremely high poverty rates it's Improved slightly thanks to the influx of funding from kovat, but we know how vital these programs are And so I just want to make the pitch.
It doesn't necessarily need to be included because you have indicated here, but with these programs they take outreach funds and the state does provide outreach funds that are available to counties through NGOs And it's extremely important because it's one thing to just have a good program like the Earned Income Tax Credit that's actually putting dollars back into the pockets of hardworking people, low-income workers. But if our folks, if our neighbors aren't actually accessing those dollars we're literally leaving state and federal money on the table that could be putting food on the table.
in these times of such extreme poverty. So I just want to always make a pitch at this opportunity and forward for making sure that we are accessing the funds that our folks are going to bat for With the state and feds to make sure that we can do much better when it comes to poverty So you'll be hearing me talk about that a lot. I think there's a lot of opportunity to increase our numbers. I looked it up last this current year 2022 in Santa Barbara County alone our lowest income workers received 12 million dollars from state and federal government In the form of child tax credits and earned income tax credit. So when we talk about women and children, poverty is front and center.
Most people living in poverty have women as the heads for their households so it's not just about important empowerment and women getting paid. About poverty, so I just want to thank you for the inclusion of that. I would put it even higher up on the list But I appreciate all the other Important work that goes into these legislative priorities. Thank you
Supervisor Williams
That's a great point. And there's going to be a number of, because of the budget deficit I think there's going to be fights at a state level that we're going to have to be enormously vigilant on about mental health funding Care Court implementation, social services potentially that usually comes up when the state goes into deficit. So I think it's timely to talk about how that can affect the least of ours in the community Uh, banner year on a federal government. I should just give you a congratulations.
You know, I mean to see such work being done on climate change and it has already significantly affected the renewable industry. It was so, you know, just to give you an idea of this when it looked like The bill was not going to happen. We literally had the slowest quarter in renewable development In the last I think 10 years You know people it it was a fact affecting The deployment of the energy transition that we really needed and now we're seeing things turn around and it had very real effects on For us, at 3CE I serve as not only the county's representative but the vice chair for the organization. And we were having in times of very little growth, we were having a lot of push and pull both in terms of unstable natural gas prices from the war in Ukraine to some of our renewable developers that had signed PPAs with us, trying to come back for more money.
And now we're seeing a better picture because of the scale of renewable investment that's starting to take place. There are more options out there and therefore the consumer is going to be in a better position It's because of the president, it's because of Congressman Carbajal and it's because of the work that the lobbying corps and you yourself have done. So we really appreciate that. Next year we hope will have just as good of a banner year at the state level in I view more of a defensive stance. And I really appreciate the work that Cliff and governmental advocates have done.
A test for us this next year whether we can remain in a position of advantage with our legislative funding, our funding from the state and our legislative platform.
With that then Madam Clerk do we have any members of the public who would like to speak? Chair Hartman and members of the board, we have no request to speak for this item. Okay well as serving on the Ledge Committee with Supervisor Williams I just want to thank Don Gilchrist for all your great reporting on the federal level and Cliff Berg who does a great job at the state level really appreciate that and I also think were very fortunate to have the delegation that we do Congressman Carbajal is readily available. His staff is here, he's on the phone warning us about things that are on the horizon.
Broadband was an example of that. Senator Lamone I've been up to Sacramento with her and being with her opens doors she's highly respected. And Supervisor Bennett, the only thing that makes it worth losing him is that we have now Assemblymember Hart taking his place. But he really worked hard for us here especially the Foothills Forever project so we're really well served and I think we pull way beyond our weight both at the federal level and at the state level. So with that I'd like a motion for staff's recommendation.
I make the motion, Madam Chair. All second? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously and thank you Ms. McGinty Turning then to our final item on today's agenda, departmental item number three. Oh I'm sorry.
3:16 – 3:258 turns
If you could just make an announcement. I'm going to go ahead and be leaving for the rest of the day. I've got a head up to ironically enough up to Sacramento to represent the county at some meetings with the rural county representatives in California so it's been a pleasure to be in the first meeting with Supervisor Capps and I will be looking forward to working for you guys this evening up in Sacramento.
Sure. And this meeting was supposed to have been in Santa Maria, so thank you we've made your job a little longer.
Drive safely and I'm glad you're rooting for Holland in the World
Cup. Madam Clerk number three.
Chair Hartman and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the Planning and Development Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund name change five-year reassessment of fees annual status report and combined 2022 2023 cycle.
Director Plowman Madam Chair members of the board As Ms. Graham indicated, we have an item here before you. It's a multi-part item and it is changing the name of our long time program from CREF to CRINF which just doesn't have the same feeling about it unfortunately. Yeah right? Sounds a little grumpy. So and then we have a five year reassessment of fees, our annual status report and discussion about the combined 2022 2023 cycle.
And today we have Erin Briggs, supervising planner. We have Ray Harmon who is the planner on the case. And then we have John Zorovitch, our deputy director. So with that, I'm going to turn it over to Miss Harmon.
Good morning, Board of Supervisors. I'm Rae Hartman and I will now be presenting on the Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund Program. The first recommended action is with regard to the proposed name change. The county received a trademark complaint concerning the acronym CREF in connection with this program. In response staff is proposing to rename the program Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund or CRMF.
The second action item is regarding the reassessment of fees. Permits for three oil and gas projects, San Ines Unit, Point Arguello and Point Pedernales each require the payment of mitigation fees to the CRUMPF program for the life of each project. The location of these projects can be seen on this map. San Ines unit is located off the Gaviota Coast. Point Arguello is off the southern coast of Vandenberg Air Force Base, and Point Vedernales is just north of that.
The CRUMPF guidelines stipulate a process by which these mitigation fees that are required to be paid for these projects are reassessed at five-year intervals. You may recall in June of 2016, your board approved a mid-cycle reassessment for the years 2015 through 2017 for the San Ynez and Point Adgeo facilities because both facilities ceased operations due to the shutdown of the Plains All American Pipeline.
In 2017, the board approved a five-year reassessment for 2018 to 22. And this 23 to 27 reassessment marks the eighth five-year reassessment. During the five-year reassessment, the three oil and gas projects are assigned up to five points per year in each of the four impact categories which are coastal aesthetics, coastal recreation, coastal tourism and environmentally sensitive coastal resources.
The points are multiplied by a fixed dollar amount to determine the crump fee of each project The fixed dollar amount was $20,000 in 1988 and it's adjusted every five years based on the change in the consumer price index or CPI. And the revised CPI adjusted dollar value for the 23 to 27 period is $53,100 per crump point. Staff recommends the 2023 to 27 schedule of cramp fees shown in this table.
Details about these reassessments are included in attachment A of the board letter. These reassessments assume that both the Point Arguello project and Santa Ynez unit will continue to be shut down through the five-year period. If the facilities are able to operate within this five year period, staff will conduct a mid cycle reassessment. With the Point Bedanales project, this five-year reassessment reflects mostly a status quo of its operations.
Both Freeport McMorrin and ExxonMobil have reviewed staff proposed reassessments for their respective facilities and concur with staff's recommendations. Another recommended action before you today is the filing of the annual status report. The Annual Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund Status Report, which is included as attachment B of the board letter, reviews the status of the 330 grants provided from CRUMP since 1988.
The report organizes the CRUMP grants by district and then by category. If staff's reassessment of the 2023 to 27 fees is approved by the board today, the county will be collecting $531,000 in February 2023 for the 2023 fees. Staff recommends setting aside $124,999 for the Hollister Ranch Access Program or HRAP And that the remaining annual balances be divided equally between the coastal acquisition and general allocation grants.
The HRAP currently has an existing balance of $750,002. With an allocation of 124,999 from each of the 2022 and 2023 fees, the HRAP will have a total of one million dollars. This would meet the Coastal Commission's special condition that requires the Point Adegayo project to provide $1 million through its CRM fees. And this million dollars is earmarked to provide initial costs for the development of a public access program for Hollister Ranch.
The recommended 50-50 split between the coastal acquisition and the general allocation sub funds for the remaining annual fees is based on the fund deferral program in the board approved Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund Guidelines. And this program stipulates that half of each year's remaining contributions be available to accrue for coastal acquisitions. Staff recommends that the board amend the Crumpf Guidelines to document the actions described today and in the Board Letter.
Specifically, the Coastal Resources Enhancement Fund Guidelines would be amended to be renamed the Coastal Resources Mitigation Fund Guidelines. In addition, the guidelines would be amended to reflect the approved reassessment of fees for the years 2023-2027 Lastly, one of the tables in the guidelines table six would be revised to reflect a total of $249,998 going toward HRAP which is that 124 999 from each the 2022 and 2023 fees.
Staff recommends that your board approve these actions before you today. Change the name and acronym to CRUMPF, reassess oil and gas projects for CRUMPF payments for 2023-27, receive and file the annual CRUmpf status report Direct staff to set aside $124,999 for each of the 20, 22 and 23 crump fees for the HRAP. Direct staff to divide the remaining fees for each year equally for the general allocation sub fund and the coastal acquisition sub fund.
Amend the crump guidelines to document all of these changes described. Direct staff to commence the combined 2022-23 crump cycle, and lastly determine that these actions are exempt from CEQA. This concludes staff's presentation. I'm happy to answer any questions and my supervisors are here as well to help answer questions. Thank you.
I don't see any lights. Do board members have any questions? I did have a question, this is probably for county council. It seems like with government acronyms there must be lots of them and for somebody to follow up maybe so this is just the path of least resistance I assume so that we don't have to fight it out but it just seems like such a minor thing anyway I'd like your comment
3:26 – 3:278 turns
Madam Chair and members of the board, I think in this particular circumstance we tend to use the acronym as the name which is similar to the company that or the entity that brought the challenge. But you are correct, we did not pursue a challenge to their claim.
And if we had would we have lost? You don't have to answer that. Madam Clerk do we have any public comment
Chair Hartman and members of the board we have no request to speak for this item.
Okay bringing it back to the board may I have a motion for staff recommendation A through H?
I'll make that recommendation. It's unfortunate because the public, you know the amount of acronyms, the amount of titles out there are hard to understand and remember anyway and it's just that it's important to note that this board isn't willingly trying to make it even less understandable but is being forced to by this private company.
I'll make a second with the, maybe this is a good opportunity for us all to use less acronyms push. That's a philosophy of mine just to make our work as accessible as possible to the public so but of course I support this measure.
Then we have to shorten the name one way or another. Anyway, we have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. We are adjourned until Tuesday December 13th, the last meeting of the year.
So they're all this short right?