UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:0313 turns
Good morning. I'll call the May 2nd, 2023 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors to order. Madam Clerk please call the roll.
Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Next item business is the approval of the minutes from the April 4th, April 6. And April 18th, 19th and 21st budget workshops.
Chair? Yes. I didn't get a chance to review the last three in time so if we could continue those to next meeting but I'd be happy to make a motion to approve the first. The
fourth and the
sixth. Fourth and sixth and then continue the budget workshops to next week's May 9th meeting.
Okay. Can I get a motion on the fourth and the sixth?
So moved.
Second. All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? And a motion to continue the minutes for the 18th, 19th and 21st. So moved.
Second.
All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? The minutes are continued. CEO's report.
No report this morning Chair Williams.
And announcements from the clerk.
Chair Williams and members of the board, I do have a couple announcements this morning. We posted an addendum on Friday April 28th amending today's closed session agenda. The closed session agenda was amended to remove a closed session agenda item under conference with labor negotiators subdivision A of government code section 54957.6 employee organization Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Association agency designated representatives county CEO Mona Miyasato and HR director Maria Elena de Guevara This addendum was posted online and made available to the board and the public.
In addition, we received a request from the department to continue administrative item number four to the May 16th Board of Supervisors meeting. Administrative item number four is from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Behavior Wellness Idea Engineering Inc. agreement for fiscal years 2022 through 2024. And again, the department is requesting a continuance of this item to the Agenda this continuation request has been posted online and made available to the board and the public.
And lastly, for the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the boards agenda please see page 2 of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. If you have any questions, please contact the clerk of the board's office at area code 805-568-2240 again That's 8 0 5 5 6 8 2 2 4 0 and that concludes my announcements for today
0:03 – 0:0916 turns
Would any board members like to pull any items from the administrative agenda I Seeing none, there is a member of the public who wishes to pull A-17. So let's read A- 17. First let's take the motion on the balance of the consent agenda so that staffers can get back to work.
Yes and Chair Williams members of the board just for clarification we do have requests from the public on A- 17 and A- 33.
But A-33 is a resolution so we will take it during the
resolutions. I'll move The balance of the agenda except for a 17 and that includes the continuance of a 4.
Thank you is there a second
2nd
all those in favor please say aye aye opposed now a 17.
Chair Williams and members of the board. Administrative item number 17 is from the Public Works Department, it is to consider recommendations regarding an agreement with Araghman Corporation for compost hauling and marketing. This is in the third district and we do have one request to speak from the public and we are going to zoom with Andy Caldwell.
Chair Williams, members of the board, Andy Caldwell representing CoLab. We have a couple of questions on this one. First of all I've never seen the word commission used for a facility we don't know if that means breaking a bottle of champagne across it cutting a ribbon what does it mean that the facility that should have been in operation a couple years now has never been commissioned?
Number two, what is wrong with the product that you can't distribute the product within the county to whoever your marketing plan says is going to be your customer? Now this is something we asked when you were building this. I have no idea whether an anaerobic digester works. That's beyond my pay grade but I do know something about compost And we've always questioned where's the market in the South County, which is fully developed and doesn't have a bunch of open ag fields. Where is the market for this much compost? So what's wrong with the product and why isn't it going to your regular product, your regular market?
The final question is a big one, especially for those of you that are all in for going all electric. Your business plan supposedly says you would use CNG powered trucks not diesel but you're gonna be using diesel we wanna know why? But more importantly why aren't you going all electric? This is an opportunity, you have a new trucking project here. The county we haven't seen you buy too many heavy duty electric vehicles and of course Gavin Newsom wants all trucks in the state long haul trucks in the State of California to go electric.
What are you waiting for? So again what does it mean to be commissioned? What's wrong with the product that you can't just disperse it According to your regular marketing plan and why aren't you going with electric vehicles to haul this stuff down to Ventura County? Thank you.
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Mr. Nelson?
Yes, thank you Chair Williams. I think the first two questions were probably questions that staff might be able to answer and I'm not sure if the third one is more of a policy question that I think the board will have to wrestle with in the future but I think the first two might help inform the public. I know the board has been briefed in an individual session at Public Works about some of the issues that are going on in Tahegas but it might help the public with that public comment to hear what commissioning is and what's going on with the compost there at Tahegas, Phil.
Chair Williams, members Yes, commissioning typically means that you've passed several acceptance tests. To date he's been operating under what's called limited operations because he's actually constructed the facilities. He's passed two acceptance tests one is pending and we're working with them for the other six. The market originally and still is intended to go to local avocado growers.
Agriment happens to be the operator of the compost facility Material that can't be marketed at this time is planned to go to their facility in Ventura for additional blending to make it marketable. Those products could come back to Santa Barbara County. That facility is equidistant approximately from the other facilities that are in our county and certainly could be reevaluated, but to date we haven't had the interest.
Thank you Mr. Wilder, I think that's helpful for the questions. I'm good with moving forward with this contract and I'll make the motion to approve item A-17.
I'll second.
And I do think it's a point well taken on the trucks while the availability of electrics for this heavy duty is pretty sparse at this time it's something to look forward into in the future In the meantime, when we have opportunities to use the CNG trucks which some fleets have already converted to that we should avail ourselves. But I'll be supporting the motion.
There's a motion and a second on A17. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Great. Now we'll go to the first resolution On a 33. Chair
0:09 – 0:126 turns
Williams and members of the board administrative item number 33 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams it is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of April 15th 2023 through April 22nd 2023 as Santa Barbara Dark Sky Week in Santa Barbara County and joining us in person today we have Barbara Greenleaf, and if you can please come to the podium. And I'll go ahead and read Whereas the aesthetic beauty and wonder of a natural night sky is a shared heritage of all humankind. And whereas, the experience of standing beneath a starry night sky inspires wonder, encourages interest in science and nature, and attracts visitors to the region. And whereas light pollution has scientifically established consequences which are detrimental to the economy, ecosystem, and human health of our community.
And whereas Santa Barbara is home to diverse species of nocturnal wildlife and these species rely on undisturbed night environments to hunt, mate and thrive. And whereas 80% of the world's population including many people in Santa Barbara County live under a dome of light pollution Excessive artificial lighting at night that disrupts natural darkness and may never experience the visual wonder and ecological health benefits of living under a dark sky. And whereas, a stated objective of the City of Santa Barbara Outdoor Lighting and Streetlight Design Guidelines is to acknowledge the objectives of the International Dark Sky Association and strive to preserve and restore view of the night sky. And whereas the International Dark Sky Association is the globally recognized authority on the light pollution and has created international dark sky week to raise awareness of light pollution and provide free education, resources and solutions to the public.
To encourage. The protection of and enjoyment of dark skies and responsible outdoor lighting. Now, therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors hereby declares April 15th through the 22nd 2023 as Dark Sky Week in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Thank you so much on behalf on behalf of Dean Axelrod and the Dark Sky Association.
Thank you. A34 I know we have one request to speak for a 33.
Chad Williams and members of the board that is correct, we have one request to speak on administrative item number 33 and we're going to zoom with Kathleen Rosenthal Kathleen.
Good morning can you hear me. Yes, we can. Please proceed. Okay. Thank you. Good morning Chair Williams and members of the board. I just wanted to pop in here and thank you for this resolution. I wanted to let you know that up here in the Santa Ynez Valley our local environmental group We Watch has been working for dark skies for over 30 years and they have recently helped the city of Buellton develop their own dark sky ordinance And we look forward to the county implementing the same and also other jurisdictions throughout the county. But I just wanted to mention their work and let you know that we are wholeheartedly behind this resolution, and we appreciate your recognition. Thank you very much.
Thank you. A34
0:12 – 0:142 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number 34 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of April 24th 2023 through April 30th 2023 as Daniel Ellsberg Week in Santa Barbara County and joining us here in person today we have Elizabeth Robinson and if you can please come to the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution Whereas Daniel Ellsberg, the Pentagon Papers whistleblower has been an inspiring activist for peace since the early 1970's. And whereas Daniel Ellsberg became a whistleblower by giving the 7000 page Pentagon Papers to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, The New York Times, The Washington Post and 17 other newspapers.
Subsequent trial on 12 felony counts posing a possible sentence of 115 years was dismissed in 1973 on grounds of governmental misconduct against him, leading to the convictions of several White House aides and figuring in the impeachment proceedings against President Nixon. And whereas since the end of the Vietnam War, Ellsberg has been a lecturer, scholar, writer and activist on the dangers of the nuclear era, wrongful US interventions and the urgent need for principled whistleblowing And whereas Ellsberg recently wrote a public letter disclosing that he has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, with the prognosis that he has only three to six months to live. And whereas Daniel Ellsberg has supported, encouraged and inspired whistleblowers, journalists and activists all over the world.
Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors declares April 24th through 30th 2023 as Daniel Ellsberg Week in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Thank you very much. There have been many times when this wouldn't have gone through here, but I really appreciate all of you and the support and have to remember that whistleblowers sometimes are working in our service. So thank you very much.
0:15 – 0:2010 turns
A35.
Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number 35 is sponsored by Supervisor Capps. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2023 as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County and joining us here in person today we have Tony Navarro, Rod Pearson and Ruth Ackerman. And I'll have you join us at the podium while I read the resolution into the record.
Whereas May of 2023 is recognized as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County to enhance public awareness of mental health and dispel the stigma surrounding it. And whereas, mental health challenges are one of the most common health conditions in California affecting 1 out of 6 adults and impacting both the person experiencing mental health challenges and those persons who care and love for the person facing the challenge.
One out of every 24 Californians with a serious mental illness have difficulty functioning in everyday life and if left untreated, have life expectancies 25 years shorter than the general population. And whereas everyday millions of people face stigma related to mental health and may feel isolated and alone going years before receiving any help. Whereas recovery can and does happen and all Californian should know that support and help is available regardless of any individual situation And whereas creating a community where everyone feels comfortable reaching out for the support they deserve is crucial to ending the stigma around mental health. And whereas access to support and ending the stigma is of paramount importance, and now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors wishes to enhance public awareness in mental health and recognizes May as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Thank you so much. Good morning, Chair Williams, supervisors and county staff. Rod Pearson is the chair of our Behavioral Wellness Commission and I'm really honored to have him here with me today. He's passing the mic to me. I just wanted to say thank you so much for this resolution and we're very excited to really be making such a big event of May Mental Health Month. I think we've had many board discussions, the state and the federal government are also really recognizing the importance of mental health awareness so we can increase access early detection and early treatment for folks who are struggling with mental health issues. And I just want us today say thank you so much to the county family for supporting the national campaign to light up green and Santa Barbara County is lit up green.
Our county buildings around the county from south to north, many of our CBO partners and other city jurisdictions have lit this county up green for the month of May and as you travel around the county in the night time you will see some really wonderful Beautiful buildings highlighted in the green, including our courthouses in both South and North. The Santa Maria, the Lompoc Admin Building, the Family Service Agency, Santa Maria Valley Youth and Family Center, Communify, all the Be Well Buildings, Family Service Agency, the Office of Emergency Management, Veterans Building, the DA's office, the Food Bank, Zona Seca, Pacific Pride, Pathpoint, The Santa Ynez Tribal Clinic, Carpinteria Health Center and City Hall and Community Library, CARP Connect, Girls Inc., CALM, the Mental Wellness Center and Telecare.
And today we have some of our CBOs with us here and we also have Be Well staff so if you could all stand up and I want to honor all of them because while And of course first five, I forgot first five and I want to honor Wendy. You're going to be partnering this month as well and community services department is here as well. And I just want to say we don't do this alone. I get to stand before you and accept this proclamation for all of the system of care Here in this county, we are so thankful for our partners today. We have Good Sam and Mental Wellness Center here with us.
They really have helped us to create a system of care to take care of the county residents. I have lawn signs for each of you in Spanish and English on either side. So any supervisors who want to take home a lawn sign please let me know.
Well, I've got a lot of lawn sign stakes all the time because I never see it. So that'll be great. I will use it.
So again, thank you. Just really proud to be part of a county that really walks the talk of commitment and care to behavioral health. Thank you.
Supervisor Capps.
Just a quick note, thank you Director Navarro and to your entire team I believe the first week of this Mental Health Month is dedicated to children's mental health and I just wanted to give a special acknowledgement to what our children have gone through during the pandemic and to all the caretakers so many student leaders now have mental health groups on campuses they get it they're getting it increasingly just the importance of destigmatizing this issue and I just wanted to acknowledge children mental health this week especially
And I also want to recognize Santa Barbara CC and UCSB. Perfect.
Excellent, thank you. Excellent points Supervisor Kaps. The first step to addressing it is realizing the kids are not our right and they've gone through a lot and there's a lot of work to make sure that they're coming forward and getting the help they need. We have one request to speak A35
Yes, Chair Williams and members of the board. We do have one request to speak on this item and we are going to be here in person for E-Planet Thunderstriker. E-Planet?
0:20 – 0:275 turns
Thank you, Board. It's not a good day because I haven't had too much coffee so... So the children, I guess we're just gonna start with that. So I just recently learned that they deal with like first person shooter drills and that's totally different than the 80s I was going to comment, like one out of six people now are dealing with mental illness and it's like well is society getting more psychotic? Are we just breeding that way or is there some other thing going on. And I feel like there's some other thing going on instead. I mentioned before it's an art form not a science and what doesn't make sense is all these not confident stand trials. Where were these people in the 80s or even in the 50s when people didn't lock their doors at night What government should be doing, what's going on in Hollywood and stuff.
That's part of the breakdown and just with all these proclamations it's like well you know with all the money a lot of money and it's like doubled in like 10 years and it's just like we're going down this path where we don't fix the problem. We don't address any truths going on in our society, in our government People are going to have breakdowns, you're going to be dealing with some irrational things all around them and just medicating them. I mean that just doesn't make sense so I guess I want to say that for that in particular hopefully there can be more analysis going on and less corruption.
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Let's go to Administrative Item 36.
Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number 36 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2023 as Wildfire Community Preparedness Month in Santa Barbara County. And joining us in person today we have Fire Marshal Rob Hazard. I'll go ahead and read the resolution into the record. Whereas may has been declared wildfire community preparedness month in Santa Barbara County And whereas the threat of wildfire is becoming increasingly prevalent and dangerous, posing greater risks to people and property than ever before. And whereas Santa Barbara County has a well-documented history of wild fire risk which has increased in both probability and severity by long term drought and climate change.
And whereas residents in areas with the potential for wildfires Can take proactive measures to reduce the risk of injury and property loss by maintaining defensible space around their homes and proactive action by a single individual or entire neighborhood. Contributes to a safer, more resilient and fire adapted community. And whereas the Santa Barbara County Fire Department works closely with operational area partners to respond to and reduce the risk of wildland fires Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims May 2023 as Wildfire Community Preparedness Month and encourages everyone to participate in fire prevention and preparedness activities at home work school and all locations, marking the beginning of a yearlong effort to improve wildfire awareness and safety passed and adopted today.
Thank you, Chair Williams, members of the board. I'm excited to be here to accept this resolution. I want to thank you for your constant unwavering support and really dedicated leadership to public safety all across our county And both the unincorporated and our incorporated cities. This county really is a model across the state for our fire service integration, public safety integration and the mitigation and preparedness efforts that are provided to our residents.
As we all see, we've had this incredible season of rain and this awesome green carpet of grass and wildflowers. Everyone's going up into the mountains and seeing this huge bloom that's happening but we also are pretty aware that all of this vegetation will dry out and become flammable and hazardous. And so really wildfire preparedness is about taking steps collectively both as communities and individuals government and private sector nonprofit to Take those and engage in those actions that create more resilience to wildfire, more resistant to embers in our structures.
Engaging in efforts like defensible space around our homes, our buildings, our businesses Creating that environment that allows us to coexist with wildfire. As we know, wildfire is ever-present in our county. There's probably nobody in this room that hasn't had some kind of exposure to wildfire and we also know that wildfire is part of the natural environment. It helps to regenerate our forests and flora and fauna are adapted to it.
It's really incumbent upon us to prepare for wildfire as an inevitable occurrence and take those actions that will really create an environment where wildfire is an accepted part of our life. And doesn't become the emergency that it currently is one of the best ways to do that, is to educate ourselves to educate our communities or property owners are residents about those steps they can take.
A awesome group in town that can help with that is our local Santa Barbara County Fire Safe Council, I wanna encourage everybody to go to their website and learn more about wildfire preparedness. They've engaged in many programs recently through grants from the federal government, state of California and through local donations to assist communities with efforts like engaging in the Firewise USA program engaging in community chipping programs, and relatively innovative efforts such as prescribed grazing across the Santa Barbara County South Coast using livestock in areas that used to be ranch lands but now are overgrown with vegetation.
The Santa Barbara County Fire Safe Council has a great website sbfiresafecouncil.org I encourage everyone to go there and learn about wildfire preparedness thank you
0:27 – 0:294 turns
Thank you Rob. Supervisor Harper?
Yes, thank you Chair Williams. Chief Hazard and I serve on the board of the Fire Safe Council. For me this was really important. I've been evacuated three times from where I live and it creates tremendous anxiety when it's hot dry and windy And so how do you deal with anxiety? Well, you educate yourself. Figure out what you can do and start doing it. And so I joined the FireSafe Council Board and I can't tell you how great their website is.
It has a lot of scientific lectures to understand more about A whole range of issues. It also has some really great information that's coming soon about house hardening and what you can do to make your house more resistant to fire, so I really do encourage you to go to the Fire Safe Council website. I think it's a tremendous resource for our community and you can even become a member I also want to mention, I always track what starts wildfires in my area and welding has started a major fire. Target shooting has a tractor tire repair but above all people have trailers that they're towing and they think it looks fine and then they load them up and it's off balance in that chain when they start driving drags along and throws sparks on the road and starts a series of fires that can get out of control.
So we have to be very careful when fire season comes, and this year is going to be a whopper because we do have so much vegetation. So visit the Fire Safe Council website and take... We need shared responsibility for fire. We can't expect government fire department to do it alone. We all have to do our part.
Thank you. Thank you, Supervisor Hartman and thank you to the board again for your support and leadership it's to be commended the support you provide to our fire agencies and to the public in general we really appreciate it.
Thank You Chief Hazard let's go to administer of item 37
0:29 – 0:356 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number 37 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution recognizing sleep and heavenly peace Santa Barbara County North Chapter and joining us in person today we have Matt Grant and Colleen Grant and while they're coming to the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution Whereas in late 2021, Colleen Grant first heard about the non-profit organization Sleep and Heavenly Peace on the radio which build beds for children in need and has the simple mission that no child sleeps on the floor in our town.
And whereas Sleep and Heavenly Peace believes that all children deserve a safe clean and comfortable place to lay their heads and this basic need serves children's physical emotional and mental well being And whereas upon hearing this call to action, Colleen reflected back to when we taught preschool and of the many students who slept on mattresses on the floor or in shared beds at home. And whereas Colleen then proposed establishing a local sleep and heavenly peace chapter to her husband Matt. And he immediately jumped on board and together they recruited informed a core team of volunteers, including Diane and Mark Smith Tracy and John genetic and Melanie and Guillermo Oglen. And whereas sleep in heavenly peace Santa Barbara County. North Chapter was officially established in January 2022 and has organized hundreds of volunteers who came together for monthly bed building workshops and donate beds along with new and unused mattresses, including sheets, pillows, and blankets.
And whereas they have built 777 beds and donated 484 to local children, but nearly 300 children are waitlisted to receive already-built beds because they do not yet have the bedding, sheets, and pillows to go along with the constructed beds. And Sleep in Heavenly Peace needs donations to help meet that need. Now, therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Sleep in Heavenly Peace Santa Barbara County North Chapter led by co-founders Colleen and Matt Grant for their passion vision and leadership in serving the basic needs of children in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Chairman Williams and members of the board, we are so honored to be here today. Supervisor Artman, I'm normally covered in sawdust when I see you but today I cleaned up a little bit. For those that don't know there's an estimated 8,000 to 12,000 children in North County alone that don't have a bed of their own. The need is real and it's huge and we are trying to make a small dent in that.
Our obvious mission is to provide beds to children that don't have them The secondary, probably equally important mission is to bring the community that's often fragmented together. And we have policy makers, we have leaders of the community, we have bed recipients working side by side for a common goal and we love that. If the public would like more information on us, they can go to our website shpbeds.org and we are in the north Santa Barbara County. You'll find my chapter there. We'll also be at Cold Coast Brewing Company this Sunday from 5 to 7. It's a family-friendly event. Bring your family and meet our staff and talk to us.
The need is real. It is everywhere. Our next public bed build is going to be What is the date? June 3rd at First United Methodist Church in Lompoc and we'd love to have whoever would like to come out. No experience necessary, we'll put you to work no matter where you're at so thank you so much.
And one question for Colleen what's it like when you go and deliver one of these beds?
It depends. Sometimes it's very emotional, sometimes it's a lot of fun. Having been a single mom for awhile and having had a child who had a mattress on the floor I relate very much with the mothers who want their children to have a safe and comfortable place to sleep. Sorry. It isn't just about getting the kids to bed or about bringing the communities together, it really is about the families as well.
Thank you, and Chair Williams could I add a little bit? So Colleen works on this full time and she persuaded her husband Matt to join her. And all their discretionary time is taken doing this. And they've assembled the team who's as dedicated as they are. They have a goal of 50 beds per month and they get different organizations to sponsor And I did it one Saturday. And you arrive and all the stations are set up with different kinds of equipment, whether it be electric saws or drills or sanders. And you can choose what station and you can move to different stations throughout the morning.
And the thing about it is, it's so much fun because people are engaged with each other and it doesn't matter if you're red, blue, purple or green. Everybody's there caring about the kids and the kind of enthusiasm that Matt and Colleen bring to this project So, I really encourage people to get involved and these are throughout North County. They work in Santa Maria as well as Lompoc although I'm happy to claim that they are based in the city of Lompoc that I have the privilege of representing And if you can't make it, then we need the bedding and you can contribute and get involved.
It builds beds, it helps support families, and it builds community. So thank you so much.
Can I just add? Sorry. Since the writing of this, we had delivered 484 beds when this was written. As of today, we have delivered 572.
0:35 – 0:416 turns
It's great sure Chair
Williams Supervisor Nelson
yeah, just as Matt's walking off You know Matt and I have been friends for over a decade And I'm just I want to thank supervisor Hartman for bringing this forward I've been able to watch their success on social media and the community if there's not a better program for us to be supporting this county than The work that the grants are doing. I don't know what is you know in it and They absolutely correct it brings people together. My mom's been out there, my brother-in-law, my nephew they're all been out there on these some of these builds and it really does build self confidence and purpose for the community as well as serving our most vulnerable I mean it is really unacceptable and it's a lot of families in Santa Maria Lompoc that we know that are having full families in one bedroom And that's often one of the reasons why our rents are so high as well because of the multi-family situation, single family homes.
And this doesn't solve all those problems but this is one of those things that can make an immediate impact right away. So I would look forward to working with Supervisor Hartman to using some of our county resources to further bring up your nonprofit so that people in the South County and throughout our county can know what you guys are up to open up new tractors in other areas as well as continue bringing the funding you need to deliver your mission.
I want to thank you. I was in that situation growing up myself, and at least in Isla Vista but probably in other places you get a lot more insects in your bed if they're not on the mattress, if you don't have a bed. And so there's real health reasons and in some places moisture mold reasons to really do your work. So we really thank you for that. Administrative item 38.
Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number 38 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams it is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Aram Alvarez and Eva Camarena of the Community Services Department as the May 2023 Employees of the Month for Santa Barbara County and if we can have Aram Alvarez and Eva to the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution Whereas Community Services Department employees, Eram Alvarez IT Systems Administrator and Eva Camarena Executive Assistant are hereby commended for the exceptional quality of service they provide as well as their essential role in supporting CSD operations and morale.
And whereas Eram Alvarez and Eva Camarena exemplify the county's values of accountability Customer focus, equity and inclusion, innovation, trust and ethics. And are deeply respected and appreciated by their colleagues for the care and commitment they demonstrate for their work. And whereas during the COVID pandemic, Irem Alvarez seamlessly supported the department's transition to remote work enabling the CSD to not only maintain but increase service levels and continue to feel connected during a very isolating time. Iram ensured that both staff and facilities were immediately outfitted with laptops, webcams and virtual communication software. He also provided and still provides comprehensive IT installation, training and support. Frequently driving to different sites from Cuyama to Carpinteria to support departmental meetings and events.
And whereas Eva Camarena serves as executive assistant to the CSD director who would testify that her work is essential to the success of the department. Eva has been integral to managing the board letter process and supports the Park Commission, Women's Commission Library Ad Hoc Commission and Human Services Commission. Eva also provides bilingual translation and interpretation services to support diverse communications from parks, sustainability, HCD and arts, and also leads on social media outreach whenever there is a challenge or need. Eva is always willing to help and does so with a smile. And whereas the Community Services Department is proud to be represented by these two employees, who in addition to the fantastic work they do at the county are also loving parents and valued community members.
And now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Irem Alvarez and Eva Camarena as Employees of the Month for May 2023 passed and adopted today.
Thank you Chair Williams, members of the board. For me it's an honor to work with these two great employees there, the epitome of team. I think they are kind of the glue for the efficiency of the department. Without Irem and without Eva, Eva crosses boundaries to help all of the divisions. People don't even have to ask her twice. She'll volunteer and as you can see from the resolution she goes above and beyond her job I think I'm his biggest customer. I call him a lot and he's always able to fix my computer whether it's remote, he's willing to drive down from North County down here so it really is an honor and pleasure. I think you know a lot of county employees are like this but these are exemplary employees and as you can see everyone from CSD all the divisions are here to support them.
I want to thank them for all the great work they do so thank you for recognizing them
0:41 – 0:4710 turns
Creating more efficiency every day. Now is the time for general public comment, how many requests to speak do we have?
Chair Williams and members of the board we have nine requests to speak on general public comment.
We will just We have a bunch of items, so we will see if you guys can keep to two minutes each.
We will begin in Santa Barbara with E-Planet's Thunderstriker to be followed by Eli Rizlenjani. E-Planet? Is
it two minutes today? Correct, it's two minutes. Okay. Yeah, unfortunately I have so many different items to cover and I'm going to get that I want to put out some treason allegations because with everything I'm dealing with by nickel-and-dime with things that we are certain that you guys have Jurisdiction over its people or be like why? So I have a claim I supposed to talking somebody in risk management I guess maybe in a couple days who was not involved in part of this and Besides all the other things that I've had to discuss with you.
And I have to put out there, I can't use internet so I can't talk about this that way and just there's just so much corruption around me and in this town that one of the things I'm dealing with is when Trump ran he fired the FBI director like a month or two after I filed a civil lawsuit against Lord and other people in the music industry I don't know when the first time he ran was and I just know that this is kind of like maybe icing on the cake. I mean, as far as that related to the Russians but he's had face-to-face contact with them multiple times.
As far as the party for our current vice president goes, that was put on by Katy Perry who has blacklisted me. Her dark horse song, that's what that song was about and the industry knows that. But supposedly people don't, and this party that was thrown by Scooter Braun was related to me making some phone calls related to that. So it's like we're dealing with this mental health thing, first person shooter drills, and it's like wait a minute has our country been taken over by treason? And it's not like I'm liberal or conservative. I've been marginalized. I've been ostracized. I don't really have particular perspectives about that.
But it's quite clear that there's too much insanity going on in just so many different arenas. And maybe some of this will be better addressed more appropriately. Oh, and related to Joyce and her litigation against you, she knew all about this kind of stuff a few years ago too. So maybe if your agenda item after I talked to risk management or something but it's just this whole town is just they don't like me and those aren't the respectable people
We will now go to Eli Rizlanjani, to be followed by Lori Baker. Eli?
My name is Ellie and I'm a caseworker in Homeless Services for Good Samaritan Shelter. I have three clients I was able to recently house at the sweeps one of which received a termination of tenancy notice just two weeks after he moved in I've experienced how discriminatory the housing search for Section 8 voucher holders can be. So when we finally found a property that was willing to even the playing field for our vulnerable population, most institutions have turned their backs on, we were relieved.
Instead of assisting these clients with housing retention, financial stability, connecting them with services to address their mental and physical well-being which my organization's resources are meant to be doing. I am just trying to convince my clients they are not meant to be back on the streets or in an emergency shelter for years again. Instead of building them up, I have to talk them down from intimidation tactics they've experienced from the core management. I've had one client with a severe mental disability coerced into signing something he did not understand while the court dangled a $7000 relocation check in his face. Others have called me panicking wondering why the access code to their doors are no longer working and they can't get into their homes.
Each week, management is finding ways to make life increasingly uncomfortable or unmanageable for my clients more than it already is for them. I ask this Board of Supervisors to please pass a rent eviction moratorium so my clients, the students, families, immigrants and voucher holders and community members with disabilities can feel some measurement of safety and security again.
We will now go to Lori Baker to be followed by Sam Cepesi. Lori?
Good morning, I just wanted to announce that the Community Services Department is extending the public comment period for draft action plan amendments that include $1.2 million dollars to the Polo Village Apartments to be developed in the City of Buelton. To clarify this is a separate development From the one that was on today's agenda item a six A 30-day public notice period was published in local newspapers Advising the public that they could speak on the item during the May 2nd board meeting This item is being moved to June 6th Board of Supervisors meeting and the public notice period has been extended to June 6 when the board will consider approval of the funding Public comments also may be provided in writing. For more information, call 805-568-3521.
Thank you.
We will now go to Sam Sapizzi to be followed by Stanley Tanksoff. Sam?
0:47 – 0:535 turns
Hello again, my name is Sam Sipesi and I'm a tenant at CBC in the Sweeps. We're so grateful that you passed the recent ordinance to require that landlords obtain permits before evicting tenants in order to renovate. Unfortunately Core Spaces has made it their mission to spread misinformation to tenants here even going so far as to insinuate that we only have a 15-day window to pick up our relocation checks that were mandated by law. Management has been repeatedly knocking on doors and posting numerous flyers claiming the new ordinance you passed does not apply to us.
After we tried to explain that the current eviction notices were invalid, a notice from their lawyer Lacey Taylor went out to every tenant saying quote unquote this information is incorrect and may jeopardize your right to relocation assistance and you may incur further damages. People are confused and intimidated by the horrible, misleading information being spread by Lacey Taylor and Core Spaces. I'm here again to ask for tenant protections. Our complex at CBC in The Sweeps are four separate buildings with many vacant units. Core Spaces has decided that we must all move out in 60 days from the eviction notice or at the date that our leases end. Why aren't there laws in place to protect us further? If they want to renovate, they should be required to relocate us To any one of the four buildings, as they've already planned for some tenants who have leases ending in January.
You can pass legislation to protect us further. You've heard so many of our stories and I'm sure if all thousand of us could be here those residents would voice the same concerns. Your hands are not tied. Pass legislation to further protect the citizens of Santa Barbara County. We need you to act before Core Spaces makes us homeless. Please pass a rent eviction moratorium now. Thank you.
Our next speaker is Stanley Tesankoff to be followed by Anaya Kepper. Stanley?
Hello, good morning Chair Williams members of the board staff and community members. My name is Stanley Tinkoff and I'm here as a longtime renter co-founder of the Santa Barbara Tenants Union. And I'm here in shoulder to shoulder with folks like Sam and the many others who weren't able to be here today urging you to pick up that conversation that you started a few weeks ago. And i just want to start off by just saying We're so grateful for the really rapid response that you took to defend these tenants and to protect this remotely affordable housing stock that we have in our community.
And as many of the tenants are realizing, and as many of you noted in that meeting several weeks ago, this is just a bump in the road for this multi-billion dollar We're here to urge you and work with you to pass an eviction, rent eviction moratorium until our housing crisis stabilizes a bit. Any laws that you pass actually apply for a significant amount of time for tenants and they can know what to expect. And ultimately, we should have a common sense policy where folks are allowed to re-rent at the same rents that they've been at If there are cosmetic or non-habitability related renovations that are significant and require displacement of those tenants.
These tenants have been through a lot, they've been through hell and back in the crosshairs of this company. They're scared but they're getting organized, incredible misinformation by their property manager, the authority figure that are the professionals that should know better. And I suspect that they do it's very convenient for this company to say that the law that you all passed does not apply to those tenants because tenants are scared and they're self evicting.
And so I urge you to consider these policies, their best practices in other places. They are something that our community can and deserves to have. And I urge you to help get the word out that the laws that you pass do apply to these tenants. Thanks so much for your time, appreciate it.
We will now go to Ananya Kepper to be followed by Nadia Abushanab. Anaya?
Hi my name is Ananya Kepper. I've been here before and I just want to kind of echo Stanley and Sam's gratitude at the urgency ordinance that you passed so quickly and so decisively unfortunately We are in a situation where the Goliath Company is going out of their way to spread willful misinformation. They're smart, they know what they're doing, they know that they're giving us information that is terrifying.
And incorrect. And they're putting us in a position where our neighbors are worried about dings to their credit, they're worried about losing their legally required relocation checks, they're worried about incurring extra damages because that's what this law firm is threatening them with and they're not listening to their neighbors like us because I don't have a law degree right?
Keeping on top of things, right? I'm just doing my best like everybody else. Whereas they have this high-priced PR firm that's spreading misinformation. They have this community lawyer that's spreading misinformation. They have multiple billions of dollars at their disposal to throw at this problem and I have maybe four hours a week. So we need your help. We need a rent eviction moratorium, we need these no-fault evictions to just not be on the table until Santa Barbara becomes more open and there become more available places to rent at a reasonable amount.
Just for reference, my apartment's not cheap. I have a one-bedroom apartment for $2,200. I rented at market value less than two years ago. Current spaces are comparably... Comparable spaces are being rented for between 24 and 2,700 right now. I can't afford that. I'm already at the outside of my ability and I'm not renting a cheap apartment. I am paying a lot of money. Core Spaces is making money off of me.
They just want to make more money off of somebody else
0:54 – 0:596 turns
We will now go to Nadia Abushanab, to be followed by Max Golding. Nadia?
Hi good morning Chair Williams and Supervisors my name is Nadia Abushanab and I'm with the Santa Barbara County Action Network and I'm also a tenant in the First District And I'm here to thank you again for your swift action strengthening the Just Cause protections last month this was a good and necessary step not only for these tenants but tenants in the future.
But it is insufficient and as you all noted, the law will create a speed bump for core spaces but it will not stop them and it will not stop affordable housing across the South Coast from being converted and lost. Regardless of what happens to the tenants that are affected today, even if they get successfully bought out of their contracts for 7,000, 15,000 30,000 whatever it is or if they're offered a new unit to move into there will be 264 naturally affordable units lost on the South Coast forever.
So I urge you to pass a moratorium on substantial remodel renovations until the vacancy rate rises to a reasonable level Or to strengthen the Just Cause ordinance. Further, to guarantee tenants a right to return at the same rate once the renovations are complete and housing to stay in while the renovations are taking place. And I also echo what Stanley was saying about the one-year lease law.
And although the COVID state of emergency has ended, there's clearly an emergency here. Supervisor Capps used the term code red to describe the situation and said it was the largest mass eviction in the state. Rents have more than doubled since before the pandemic in the community of Isla Vista, and you can't go to any meeting in Santa Barbara County without hearing the words housing crisis. This is an emergency and you can pass a moratorium based on this emergency. And we've been working hard to try to find other jurisdictions with ordinances that you could model after. And there are other jurisdictions to look to, but also Santa Barbara County is over and over again listed as the most unaffordable county to live in in the state.
And if we're seeing this, the largest mass eviction in Isla Vista and the greatest threats to livelihood it would make sense that Santa Barbara County should have one of the strongest ordinances in the state. Thank you so much for your time.
We will now go to Max Golding to be followed by John Tyne, who's our final speaker. Max?
Oh that's great. John Tyne is here. I was going to read something by his law firm. I'm just gonna actually skip what I was gonna say and just go straight to that. So the law that you guys passed on April 6th says the requirements herein shall apply to termination notices provided after the effective date This of this ordinance and in any unlawful detainer action initiated after the effective date of this ordinance Which means that it applies to notices that a landlord might post to the to the tenant store saying you know You have to leave because of substantial remodel Or it applies to the lawsuit that comes after the notice which is called an unlawful detainer So it does like unambiguously. This is not like someone trying to practice law Like he oddly accused me of that yesterday in an email That I was doing something illegal by telling So I'm going to start by saying thank you to all of our panelists for being here today.
I want to say a couple things before we get started. For this in the letter. It says the requirements herein shall apply to the termination notices provided after the effective date And then they don't mention the unlawful detainer part So there are very powerful lawyers that are you know, they mostly fight for landlords? They're very wealthy. They're very rich people with a lot of power and Most tenants it doesn't matter if Alex entrican an eviction defense attorney comes You know this Saturday after you guys pass the law and does this tenants rights workshop and says like here's what the law means like People asking questions, raising their hand, he calls them and here's what that means. Here's what this means. They got straight to the doors of all the tenants, right?
Core Spaces paid them a shit ton of money to do this. They're gonna pay them a shit ton of money to file the unlawful detainers even though they know they're gonna lose every single one but they lied by omission from this and they're gonna keep doing this kind of stuff until you guys pass something that is much more comprehensive like a moratorium on no fault evictions, thanks.
We will now go to John Tyne who is our final speaker on general public comment.
Good morning members of the board. My name is John Tine, I'm the senior partner of Tine Taylor Fox Howard and my partners Lacey Taylor and Justin Fox are working with Core Spaces in this matter. I think that the Tenants Union and the folks who are here today should take comfort in the fact that Supervisors Williams and Supervisor Capps have proactively and productively reached out to us we are new lawyers Four core spaces. We are new to this particular incident and we are working collaboratively with the board and will work collaboratively with the Tenants Union and with tenants. We have invited tenants to contact us directly, and those who have contacted us directly, we have worked out individual solutions that work for them. And so we will continue to do that.
We are changing the manner in which this matter has been handled thus far, and we encourage more communication and more collaboration. We do ask you to stay any additional legislative acts until we can work things out with the tenants, and I appreciate your time. Thank you.
0:59 – 1:0411 turns
Supervisor Capps and just so folks know our normal business for general public comment We don't generally do a back-and-forth, but there is a lot of issues that was raised today and supervisor caps
Thank You chair Williams And thanks to those who've spoken about this as the public can see the trauma the stress the chaos continues I appreciate the metaphor of Goliath. This is the David and Goliath situation And we acted swiftly. I want to thank my colleagues for that emergency meeting by strengthening the county ordinance, which was already exceeding what the state offers in terms of protections where I'm now engaging with state leaders to see which potential state and federal laws might have been broken given the protected classes That we've heard stories of time and again, of elderly, of different ethnic groups that have been displaced by this action.
I believe firmly having been out there many times how big this is. This is an entire city block It's not just one building. These renovations that apparently need to happen can happen by moving people who are committed to staying, and I commend those who are committed to staying while those renovations happen. That seems very logical and keep people where they need to live given again we have a 1% vacancy rate.
The moratorium has been asked I appreciate your organization your advocacy. I was hoping that Our counselor could address what steps would need to be taken for That action if possible County Council
Mr. Chair and Supervisor Capps, can you repeat exactly which actions you're referring to?
Thank you it would be what's been requested which is a moratorium on rent evictions.
Mr. Chair members of the board we did look at some of the samples that were provided in public comment unfortunately those were COVID eviction moratoriums for the most part which the Santa Barbara County also did during that time Another example was a holdover ordinance until the tenant protect Protection Act became effective which occurred in 2020 We're happy to keep looking at other solutions, but we have not completed diet
Thank You chair Williams for that point of work
And I just add that we continue to look at what legal options are for the county on this policies just yesterday Supervisor Hartman and myself directed staff to work on the legislative committee to support a bill by Maria Elena Durazo, a senator from Los Angeles who is doing a bill that would make it state law to offer rent evicted tenants the ability to release at the same price in terms of the original lease.
And so there's actions both at a state and local level that we will continue to look at and pursue.
Thank you. If I just my chair Williams, I meant to thank the caseworker with good Sam because that on the ground work is so critical right now with everybody with the variety of different situations related to health related to safety related to family related to pets related to mental health. So I just there's so many people here who are engaged in this crisis and I just want to thank you personally for coming to public comment today and continue the work it's it could not be more important. Thank you.
Supervisor Hartman.
Yeah, I realize this isn't agendized today but but the question that is looming in my mind is Is Incorrect information being peddled to tenants and how can that be countered? And I'm not sure how to raise that in an appropriate context, but that's an important question. I'd like to have answered
Thank you We'll proceed now to departmental item number one
1:04 – 1:0812 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number one is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an extra help service and retirement waiver for the Public Works Department.
Good morning, Chair Williams and Supervisors. My name is Andrea Geis and I'm the Fiscal and HR Manager for the Public Works Department. We are requesting that your board consider approving an extra help retirement waiver that would allow us to rehire Leslie Wells, the former Deputy Director of the Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division before six months have passed from her retirement date.
Ms. Wells retired in March of this year and we currently have numerous interim positions in our department right now, interim management positions. We have identified two internal candidates who are well qualified to secede Ms. Wells. Ms. Wells provided us with several months notice of her retirement and we started a rotation program for these two candidates so that they could get experience rotating through an Interim Deputy Director position We started this rotation in January to maximize our time with Ms. Wells so that she could focus on training her future successors prior to her retirement.
The second rotator's temporary appointment will end in August. By bringing Ms. Wells back now instead of after her six-month wait period has passed, it will allow us to utilize her historical perspective which will be crucial for the rotation and also in the months after the rotation when her permanent replacement is selected. Ms. Wells was deputy director of the division for over four years and prior to that she was a key part of the management team for 20 years, so her knowledge and experience is extensive and would be of great benefit to our staff.
We anticipate that if approved her extra help appointment would last no longer than the end of this calendar year. Thank you for your consideration of our request
Questions from the board? Supervisor Nielsen. Yeah, I
don't know if this question is necessarily for Ms. Geis which excellent presentation But you know instead of bringing some these employees back as or former employees back as employees I was kind of Musing in our office where it might be more appropriate to bring them back to some type of contractors Instead of employees in the future, and I don't know if that's been considered They obviously have a specialized talent and information that really has value And you know I wouldn't fault anybody for being able to do some kind of consulting work in the future for the county And I didn't know if that differed on coming back after six months as a consultant versus an employee It is a question for HR or for councilor CEO something. I would be You know because we're having a lot of these and I do appreciate how it works department not jumping To the very next meeting after retirement to do this That's well appreciated, but I'm also trying to find a solution so that we can limit these in the future So this might be a pathway that I'm curious about
Supervisor Nelson through the chair. It's a good question and it the answer is it depends And it really is depends on are they an independent contractor do they follow IRS rules as far as having true independence meaning? They're not being directed By the director other ones Otherwise, so we will look at all that and when we bring Employees back we do look at that are they really an independent contractor per IRS rules or are they going to be under the direction of of the department. And having said that, there are still some complexities regarding our retirement law and our SB CSRS rules.
And so recently they've enforced or put in some other rules that we'll be following about time limits and from their perspective it may not matter whether they are contractors or not. So we're still working through that but we appreciate it and I believe there is As you said there is expertise when we have employees leave us that we need in the county and finding out the best way To employ them and use it expertise to the benefit of our taxpayers, and our County is important.
Thank you
Any comments questions any public comment on this item
Chair Williams members of the board we have no request to speak on this item
Can I get a motion
move approval?
Second
second
Second all those in favor. Please say aye aye opposed Thank you, thank you, that's four to one departmental item number two
1:08 – 1:119 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board departmental item number two is from first five Santa Barbara County Children and Families Commission It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an extra help service and retirement waiver for the first five Santa Barbara Children and Families Commission
Good morning, Chair Williams and members of the Board. Wendy Sims-Moulton with First 5 asking for authorization and approval of First 5 for me to appoint a retired employee Suzanne Hayes as an extra help employee to assist with the technical assistance and support for the incoming First 5 fiscal analysts which we are in recruitment right now and her time is not to exceed 100 hours of annual service with effective date hopefully with approval today.
Ms. Hayes retired as of March 31st with over 11 years of service, her primary assignment including managing the daily fiscal operations, ensuring compliance with state regulatory offices and the primary coordination of two key functions within First 5, the budget and audit process preparation. Ms. Hayes will provide key technical assistance and guidance during this transition to ensure continuity of the fiscal operations. And due to a recruitment process, we had planned realizing that she was going to leave and know how complex the duties are with First 5. We had planned six months ahead of time in fact it's in our budget for 22-23 But due to whatever not being able to have two positions to be able do it Later learning that later down the line this thus me before you today asking for this approval for extended of her time So we asked for approval To appoint her for not to exceed 100 hours and then will hopefully have our recruitment in place during that time
Is there any public comment on this item
chair Williams and members of the board? We have no request to speak from the public on this item
comments questions Can I get a motion?
Move approval. I'll second.
All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed?
Nay.
4-1. Thank you. Thank you. Go to departmental item number 3.
1:11 – 1:1612 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the Human Resources Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an amendment to the ordinance setting compensation and benefits for members of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors.
Good morning, Chair Williams and members of the board. I am here today to introduce the first reading of an ordinance to amend the current County Ordinance number 15119 which sets compensation and benefits for members of the Board of Supervisors. The HR department is recommending the following changes Increase the maximum increase from 3% to 5%, which is tied to CPIU.
Adjust the timing of future increases to be effective in the pay period in which October 1 falls instead of Pay Period 1, which is the same timing as elected department heads will receive their salary increases. Memorializing the increase which will be effective on September 18, 2023 and continue to provide the same benefits elected department heads receive such as county contributions for health and dental insurance automobile allowance and life insurance. And continue to provide for future adjustments to board member compensation
Thank you, any questions from the board? Supervisor
Hartman. I did have a question this caught my eye compared to similar counties the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors salaries are 30% below the market median and the market average so I just wondered what kind of research when when you did that research and was that our benchmark counties or just wanted a little more background on that statistic
Supervisor through the chair, so I did do some surveys on the comparable counties that are currently listed in our management plan which we know you are not part of the management plan but so that there's consistency in the counties that were surveyed and compared to those other board members your salaries are significantly behind them.
Any other questions? Supervisor Labrador if there's no other discussion I'll move the item One comment, sorry.
Chair Williams and members of the board I just want to note for the record we didn't have any requests to speak on this item.
So Mr. Lavagnino you made the motion is there a second?
I'll second.
And you know I'll just say you know for the Since since we don't all all over disclose and I tend to be the one that does but you know, I mean in the first district being one of the places with the highest rents and home prices. I would basically not be able to afford to do this job if my wife basically wasn't heavily subsidizing, you know, this effort. You know so she locks herself up in what my kids call the cave for her consulting and her clinical work That's probably not a strategy that we want to rely on, on the future for how we get people to serve.
If we want to have people with expertise and experience, we can't rely on whoever that future supervisor is to have like a saucre tante taking care of all the bills in order to... So you wanna have a supervisor It can actually make rent or a mortgage in the first district. And so I think it's this is just sort of how a move to help have how the institution can function in the future.
Mr. Chair, I would. Mr Labadino? Yeah, I would just say that I think 99% of the people out there are the households are feeling the same way as you like. You know, I don't know I'm also looking at this as a I think if you look at city councils across the county. They're also there. I think they're even in a more dire circumstance where I'm not going to say you get what you pay for, but how much time is that person going to really be invested?
And it's nice that people do it and they consider it a service. But these jobs do take up much larger than 40 hours a week, I would say, especially when you talk about weekends and nighttime. So yeah, I've been through the salary survey. We're way under any other county. I have no problem moving forward with this. Supervisor Hartman,
I just wanted to underscore. This is far more than a full-time job
1:16 – 1:2211 turns
If you do it correctly I did have somebody tell me this would be the easiest job you ever had and they said yeah Oh if you don't do it. Yeah, it's
pretty easy Supervisor Kaps.
I'll just add the point that we want these jobs to be filled not by people who are independently wealthy or retired, but actually raising kids and in the mix of the kind of work that we're doing so I just see that also on the school board which pays almost nothing and yet is so time intensive and yet we have all these high expectations so I'm happy to move this forward and just really want our government to be more reflective of the people that we are serving
Okay we have a motion to second all those in favor please say aye.
Aye.
Opposed? No. We will go on to departmental item number four
Good morning, Chair Williams and members of the Board of Supervisors. My name is Marty Wilder, the Interim Deputy Director for the Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division in the Public Works Department. This action before you today is to consider modifications to Chapter 17 of the County Code to allow for one or more haulers for trash in the unincorporated area of the county.
I'm going to introduce Leslie- Marty?
Yes. The clerk just needs to read it into their record so just hold on. Thank you.
Chair Williams, members of the board thank you. Departmental item number four is from the Public Works Department it is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ordinance amending chapter 17 solid waste services of the county code regarding minimum number of franchised haulers in the unincorporated area. Thank you.
Thank you. Leslie Wells, Manager of the Collections Materials and Management Section is here to run through the PowerPoint for the modifications to the County Code Chapter 17. Thank you.
Thank You Marty I'm Leslie Robinson but there have been two Lessies for a long time no worries thanks Marty good morning Chair Williams members of the board thank you so much. Thank you so much for your time today. I'm going to jump right in and provide a little background on this item, Chapter 17 of the County Code which pertains to solid waste services currently requires a minimum of two franchised haulers In the unincorporated area of our county. Marburg Industries currently services zones 1, 2 and 3 in the southern and northeastern portions of the county and Waste Management currently services zones 4 and 5 in the Lompoc, Santinez and Santa Maria valleys I know it's a bit difficult to see the details on this map, but it provides a general overview of where the collection zones are located.
Zone 1 primarily covers the unincorporated Carpinteria Valley, Summerlin and parts of Montecito. Zone 2 includes unincorporated areas around the cities of Santa Barbara and Goleta. Zone 3 includes Isla Vista, Hope Ranch, the Gaviota Coast, Quiama Valley and some areas along Highway 154. Zone 4 includes the unincorporated Santines and Lompoc valleys. And zone 5 includes Orchid and other areas in unincorporated Santa Maria valley.
In November of last year, the county released an RFP for solid waste collection services for Zones 4 and 5. The county's current agreement with Waste Management for those zones ends on June 30th of 2024, and the new agreement will begin on July 1st of 2024. Four companies submitted proposals in response to that RFP including Marburg which ranked in the top two based on the RFP criteria.
Because Marburg currently services Zones 1, 2 and 3 an amendment to Chapter 17 is necessary to enable the further consideration of Marburg's proposal and allow for subsequent negotiations. The proposed amended text for Section 17-29C1 reads as follows. It shall be the policy of the County of Santa Barbara that a minimum number of collectors is not required to provide regular solid waste handling services within the unincorporated area of the county, and the board shall have the discretion to award franchise agreements for all zones to one single collector or multiple collectors. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the county from terminating a franchise or contract with a collector or seeking a new collector to provide solid waste handling services in any zone or territory.
The amended text allows for the selection of one or more collectors and provides the county with maximum flexibility for franchise services. The code would not preclude a particular hauler simply because they provide services in other zones. In terms of the competitive process, the county will retain the ability to issue future RFPs as was done last year. The RFP process provides that venue for competition between companies and ensures that the county is getting fair market rates.
It should be noted that the franchises themselves are exclusive service areas. Haulers are not permitted to provide regular collection services in zones for which they do not have a franchise agreement. Outside of the unincorporated area, municipalities within the county contract separately for solid waste collection services. Goleta, Santa Barbara and Buelton currently have agreements with Marburg.
Solvang in Guadalupe have agreements with Waste Management. Carpinteria has an agreement with EJ Harrison & Sons. And Lompoc and Santa Maria provide their own municipal collection services. In closing, staff recommends upon its second reading that your board adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 17 of the County Code and determine that the amendment is not a project under CEQA as it is an administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
That concludes our presentation. Thank you again for your time.
1:22 – 1:2811 turns
Is there any questions before we go to public comment? Let's go to public comment.
Chair Williams and members of the board we have one request to speak on this item, and you're going to remain here in Santa Barbara with Derek Carlson Derek.
Good morning. Derek Carlson with Marburg Industries and I just want to thank the board for their consideration of allowing Marburg Industries proposal to move forward with further consideration from staff. I just want to say that over the past several decades, Marburg has been providing services here in Santa Barbara County, probably eight decades. And over the last several decades the county of Santa Barbara has issued several customer service surveys for its solid waste services, probably close to half a dozen and on every single one of those customer service surveys Marburg Industries has rated number one as the top-rated solid waste service provider in the county of Santa Barbara. And today we have a opportunity to bring that top-notch level of customer service to North County residents along with reduced pricing, improved services, increased diversion and a coordinated effort throughout the entire county of Santa Barbara in our solid waste services.
Excellent opportunity to improve the services and the customer experience in North County and We again, thank you for your consideration in allowing our proposal to move forward For further evaluation from staff. So thank you
And that concludes public comment
on
this
item
Supervisor Hart
Thank you Chair Williams. As I think about the premise of this ordinance when it was first adopted, I think it's a flawed premise. We have exclusive operating areas. We're familiar with those given other issues we've considered But once you're in one of those areas, there's really no competition. So the RFP is the opportunity for competition. I suppose it might have been premised on the idea we want to keep different hauling companies in the county but the cities already do that and were close enough to SLO and Ventura that I don't see that as an issue.
So I live for example in the Santa Ynez Valley and in my office, I hear a number of concerns about our current waste hauler. And yet we really had to keep that one because we needed to have a different one that was down Here so this is an opportunity. I think to correct a flawed ordinance and Because I don't really think there's a rationale for it, and I think this allows greater responsiveness to the RFP
Supervisor Nelson
yes, thank you chair Williams. I agree with that supervisor Hartman that it's a flawed premise It's somehow Eliminating competition would somehow bring down costs and that doesn't make any sense, right? I mean you want to have more competition. That said we went through a process a couple years ago with an extension. I think an extension with Marburg in the zones one through three but in four and five we did a short term extension with waste management.
In part, we needed time to take a look at it. And I do want to compliment on Waste Management over the last couple of years they have had some improved services and I think at that time the board has said hey let's begin the RP process work with consultant and move forward. I personally had worked with staff and was okay with maybe potentially extending the contract with waste management. I thought that they were making strides towards improving service.
As well as I think we had took those initial hits on cost. We had some pretty significant rate increases, 30-40% for residentials. Some of our commercial customers almost doubled and I was really concerned about going to RFP process because you know I hadn't known in other jurisdictions rates had doubled again when this has happened is a very Heavily regulated industry, a lot of cost involved and I'm really concerned about that being passed down to my constituents. So I was very nervous when we went through with this RFP process and one of the requests that I had is if we did go through the RFP process that we really truly opened it up to all potential bidders so that we didn't limit Those that could bid for this.
And so, this is one of the promises made to me by staff that we would have this forward when it came through if Marlboro was one of the finalists and it appears that's the case. So I'm very supportive of moving forward with this in trying to get the best service at the lowest rate for our constituents I think is our responsibility if we are going to do these franchise agreements. We are tasked with I want to make sure that this is not a reflection on the service of waste management, necessarily. But we went through a competitive bidding process and staff has some results that dictate where we're going moving forward. So again, I'm supportive.
1:28 – 1:464 turns
Supervisor Lavinia? Thank you Mr. Chair. Well my two biggest concerns were of course cost and then customer service but there is another one That I was concerned about moving forward with this. And that is if we do create small islands of cities, small cities, especially I was thinking about Guadalupe. If we do open it up and if Marboard did come north then waste management would then be shrunk inside these cities and what would happen? They would create these islands working with staff.
Educated on how that would work. That was a scenario that we're all looking at, we're prepared for that. So I just want folks to know that they're not gonna be in an abandoned situation if something like that happens. But I'm supportive of the ordinance change.
Well, a lot of the concerns that I had about this whole process has been addressed by my colleagues. The one that I would just mention hasn't has been how far trucking needs to happen and I put out there real publicly to folks that's one of the issues that I had. with the whole RFP process is we shouldn't have people trucking to Kingdom Come when there are facilities, including our own close by.
And so I understand the logic behind the ordinance at its inception But I feel like its usefulness has been outlived and that there are some efficiencies that can come. My understanding is there's still two, top two in the RFP but I think by approving this today we allow there to be two to be looked at by the department instead of just one to be looked at by I don't think there's been a motion. Has there been a motion yet?
Chair Williams, I would move A through C in our staff report.
I'll second. All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries. We will take a five minute break or do we need to make it ten minutes for translators? Okay. Ten-minute break. We're reconvening this meeting of the Board of Supervisors and at departmental item number five.
1:46 – 1:523 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number five is from the Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Home Consortium and Community Development Block Grant CDBG urban county fiscal year 2023 through 2024 annual action plan action plan and fiscal year 2022 through 2023 Action Plan Substantial Amendment.
Good morning, Chair Williams and members of the board. As the clerk stated, we're here today for consideration of the county's 2023 annual action plan and the action plan amendment that will be submitted to HUD. The plans include how the county will utilize the county's annual allocation of community development block grants and the home investment partnership funds with me is Lori Baker, our housing and program manager who will make the presentation
Good afternoon, Chair Williams and members of the board. The county receives an annual allocation of Federal Home Investment Partnerships or HOME funds and Community Development Block Grant or CDBG funds. This slide shows the recommended actions as provided in the board letter. In November 2022, the County Division of Housing and Community Development or HCD published a notice of funding availability to solicit applications for three funding opportunities.
Public services programs capital and other eligible projects affordable housing projects. 15% of CDBG may be used to fund public services programs that serve primarily low-income persons. Other eligible projects include capital, economic development, minor home repair and other programs that serve primarily low income persons. Affordable housing development is funded through federal, state and local funding sources including the HOME Program, State Permanent Housing Allocation Program or from county fees that are collected from developers in lieu of building affordable units under the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
HCD staff conducted eligibility review of public services applications, then forwarded them to the county's Human Services Commission allocations committee which reviewed and scored the applications. The committee met to hear presentations from applicants and to make funding recommendations. The funding recommendations are before your board today for consideration and approval.
HCD staff and County's Capital Loan Committee considered CDBG capital and affordable housing development project proposals. The capital project funding recommendations are before your board today for consideration and approval. Staff will bring affordable housing projects back to the board They are ready to proceed and if funded with home funds also an action plan amendment for example today's administrative agenda included funding a funding reservation For village senior apartments to be constructed in the city of Bulton. That was item a six I In response to the NOFA, we received 26 applications for public services funds for just over $183,000 available.
We received six applications for capital projects for just under 1.2 million dollars available and we've received 13 applications for affordable housing development projects The county is the lead agency of the CDBG-Urban County Partnership, which includes the unincorporated county and the cities of Carpentria, Buellton and Solving. Each city may identify projects or programs for the respective sub allocations or pool their funds with the counties for inclusion in the annual NOFA.
The City of Carpentria selected applicants for funding from their sub allocation of $14,890 in CDBG for public services programs which was approved by its City Council and included in the 2023 action plan for final approval by your board today This slide shows the funding recommendations by the Allocations Committee of the Human Services Commission for CDBG Public Services Program.
The italicized font shows the City of Carpentria's selected programs. A full list of the applications received is included in the board letter. This slide shows the funding recommendations by HCD staff and the Capital Loan Committee for CDBG capital projects. A total funding request for capital, the total funding requests for capital projects far outweighed the available funding therefore not all applicants' projects could be funded and not all recommended projects could be funded at the requested amounts.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the board. I was just trying to reconcile.
1:52 – 1:5922 turns
The 2324 capital number that we have is $7.95 on slide 7, but then it's a 1.1 million on slide 9. Can you help me with that math there?
We when we calculate the amount of CDBG that's available. We have the prior year uncommitted funds We also have about $60,000 in program income which is from prior loan repayments on it was a down payment assistance program some years ago And then the 2023 allocation of the 795 so that added up together Is about 1.2 million dollars available
Okay Thank You that helps
The county is a lead agency of the Home Consortium, which consists of the unincorporated county and the cities of Carpentria, Goleta, Buellton, Solvang, Lompoc, and Santa Maria. Each city may identify projects for their respective suballocations or pool their funds with the counties for inclusion in the annual NOFA. Home funds may be used for affordable housing projects and programs including multifamily housing development, homeownership programs, and tenant-based rental assistance.
The City of Lompoc will use its suballocation to administer a tenant-based rental assistance program that will provide security deposits for low income households seeking rental housing. In addition, the City of Santa Maria will use a portion of its suballocation to administer a tenant based rental assistance program that also provides security deposit assistance.
The other cities pooled their funds with counties to be awarded through the county's process. HCD staffs maintains a list of prospective housing projects and staff will return to the board at such time that projects are ready for a funding reservation or award. Therefore, the 2023 action plan does not contain any housing development projects at this time. This concludes our presentation and we are available to answer any questions.
Questions from the board? Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, you think thank you chair Williams I was looking at the CDBD capital project areas so Cities also get CDBG capital funds as well like Santa Barbara Carpinteria Are we doing carpentry is in built-ins?
Supervisor Nelson through the chair, the cities of Santa Barbara, Goleta, Lompoc and Santa Maria each receives an annual allocation of CDBG. So our urban county includes Solvang, Buellton and Carpentria. The city of Guadalupe elected not to join our consortium so they are excluded from the CDBG Urban County. That's not to say that we can't fund the projects in Guadalupe and we have but they're not included there Any funds that they could have brought to the to the county as from being a member of the urban County We don't we don't have we are not allocated funds on their behalf
So the funds are sourced and we get income on a per capita basis. Is that how that works?
Yeah, it's a formula but that's part of it yes I
Do you know that any of those cities like Santa Barbara or Santa Maria are spending capital funds on other jurisdictions outside of their own?
I'm not aware of that. I am pretty certain that the cities of Lompoc and Santa Maria typically fund their own infrastructure and capital projects That the city is
It would be unusual if they spend it outside the jurisdiction.
I would think so. So all right, thank you. I'll have some comments and deliberations.
Supervisor Kaps?
Thank you, Chair Williams. And thank you for this presentation. I am trying to get my arms around the many different sources of funding for housing knowing that we have such a crisis and people are struggling. So my question really is about the two that were referenced with the home project, the city of Santa Maria. I know security deposits are such a huge barrier. You hear that from folks. I've experienced it myself. It's just especially if they seem to be increasing where it used You know, half of the first month and now it's first and last etc. Sometimes even double that so what could you just kind of elaborate on what these programs are intended to do and how effective they are?
And just to clarify, it's the cities of Santa Maria and Lompoc that are using home funds for this tenant-based security deposit
assistance. Supervisor Caps or the Chair? They are very successful programs. The barriers that I've heard from the city of Santa Maria is that housing is scarce so even with the security deposit assistance finding an affordable unit is still very, very challenging.
However, the TBRA program as she said is very successful in terms of most folks can't afford a first and last month's rent to be able to have access to the units. So that is an effective program.
I'm just trying to understand pragmatically this is a check for the security deposit that you have to pay back or it's a gift or a grant? What is
it actually? It's a grant so when they move out to the extent They earned it back that it is theirs to keep, presumably to put toward the security deposit for the next unit. And you qualify by income? By income yes. It's 80% or below I'm sorry 60% are below the area median income
And this was during the pandemic, but yet this is something that's continuing. Is that accurate?
Yes. The City of Santa Maria has historically run a TBRA program for security deposit assistance for many, many years and Lompoc has in the past as well, but they haven't in recent years and this year for 2023 they'll begin another program.
Okay, two more questions on this one program. I know I'm asking you to speak about city programs but can you give a rough ballpark of how many people these would be impacting?
1:59 – 2:0519 turns
44 for Lompoc which is 123,000 so give or take about the same amount of people for Santa Maria which is 150,000. Okay
and just lastly a more general question but you know I know there's always good intention around some of these programs what kind of accountability measures in general would you say are in place to make sure that these dollars are Reaching the right people that are being used effectively. What what kind of Stop gaps are in place to ensure that this this is good government spending
There is an application and the city's advertise that through their own means They come through the city with an application There's an income qualification procedure where their income is checked with pay stubs for employment tax returns and what not there's also an agreement between the city and the landlord. They have to be offered at least a one year lease, and that the unit itself is inspected to make sure it meets housing quality standards.
Thank
you.
Those are my questions for now.
Supervisor Hartman.
I just had a follow-on question to Supervisor Caps, and that has to do with ARPA. Could you give us a quick synopsis of how the county spent its money in terms of tenant assistance? And is any money left over? I'm sort of thinking about this in terms of our budget workshops and our direction to set aside a pot of money for this kind of assistance that would come from the County General Fund.
I'm trying to understand that in this bigger context.
This is Superheart Hartman through the chair, I can speak to the home ARP, a special allocation that we received from HUD during COVID. A portion of those funds and I apologize I don't recall how much of that was earmarked for tenant based rental assistance The housing authorities of the county and the cities will both administer those programs. Other home ARP dollars went for housing development, specifically the hotel acquisition in Goleta, Winnetara and then some homeless supportive services.
And Supervisor, if you're also asking about the emergency rental assistance program that we ran from United Way. Okay yeah go ahead and Laurie why don't you answer that? I think there were over 30 million dollars that we administered
Yeah, $30 million from US Treasury and another 4.9 through the state of California also through the US Treasury. There's $32 million from US Treasury and those were used that program has ended but those were used for people who experienced a loss of income during COVID and these dollars were meant to help them continue to pay their rent And rent arrears and even perspective right three months going forward and in some cases utilities as well
Super, I'm sorry Supervisor Hartman through the chair in response to your question, your board did ask us at the budget workshops as a priority to look at different rental assistance programs we've expended everything we had for COVID. Having said that, we are as we said we're going to look back on our funds and see what's available and what's left over, and whether any of that could be used so we're still in the process of doing it.
Supervisor Lavinia. Thank you, I was wondering if you could just detail out it was there $280,000 for Bridge House for It looked like there were upgrades, just kind of utility upgrades.
Those are for yes design of the utilities. The project is to actually hook into the city of Lompoc's water and sewer system so that money is going towards assessment engineering hopefully build out. There's more money I think there's also some ARPA money associated with that project but yeah that's where it's
Supervisor Nelson.
Yes, thank you chair Williams and I just wanted to ask I mean we've been involved in t-bra in our county for Quite a few years right? We it's not only with ARPA funds but it's been a program. We've been pretty Invested in and in our county with funds for quite some time So these projects the home funds just are that's one source to have to base regional systems But we've been doing with other sources through your department for years. I mean, I think I first saw it back in 2013-2014 and it seems to be often in our budgets that we're continuing to expand that program as funds are available. Am I right there? Am I recalling that correctly?
Supervisor Nelson through the chair, this TBRA or TBRA as you reference it which is also commonly used acronym. Through our office we have just this through the home dollars, the regular home dollars that's always been available for use in the cities of Santa Maria and Lompoc have used it for that purpose We at the county with the rest of the funds we've always historically Prioritized making our developing permanent units There have been some years in the past where we didn't have enough developments and we would put those funds toward TB RA Because we have a two-year commitment deadline for those funds and we have administered a countywide TBR a program in the past administered by the Housing Authority and And it was helpful then to help get people off the Section 8 waiting list sooner TBRA is a two-year program.
So it does sunset after two years, but it gave an a little It got people off the waiting list sooner so it does provide a very useful service But again, we've we have plenty of developments right now that are in our pipeline that will use these funds too for permanent units
Okay Let's go to public comment.
Chair Williams and members of the board, we have three requests to speak on this item. We're going to Sylvia Bernard to be followed by Ben Remo. Sylvia?
2:06 – 2:1111 turns
Good morning there. To the Board Chair and Board Supervisors, I am Sylvie Bernard. I'm the Executive Director of Good Samaritan Shelter. I am here to speak on behalf of Good Samaritan and the need for CDBG operating funds. I know that the decisions that are made by the Human Services Commission are difficult. There are so many good organizations doing great work and truly meeting the needs of the community.
Good Samaritan applied for operating funds under CDBG for both the Bridge House Shelter and Freedom Warming Center. Both of these programs have historically been funded by CDBG funds, and this is the first year that we were not recommended for funding. Ten years ago or over ten years ago, Good Samaritan took over the management of Bridge House in Lompoc in partnership and at the request of the County of Santa Barbara. At that time, Good Samaritan made it clear that we needed to ensure the ongoing funds that were already allocated to support the operations.
Last year alone Bridge House served 468 unduplicated persons and provided 24,210 bed nights at that location. 39% of the population served last year alone at that location are identified as chronically homeless. That is up from 10% pre-pandemic, so the challenges of serving the population have really increased for us. Two years ago Good Samaritan took over the Freedom Warming Center in partnership with the County of Santa Barbara and once again Good Samaritan made it clear that we need ongoing operating funds to take over the administration operations of the Freedom Warming Centers countywide.
Freedom Warming Center, as you can imagine had its busiest season ever this last season with 58 days of activation which was actually 35% of the days in during the activation season. 496 clients were served in this past season providing 3,665 bed nights I am respectfully asking that the Human Services Commission and or the Board of Supervisors please fully fund our requests for funding for the operations of Freedom Warming Center and Bridge House through the budget process. Good Sam is proud to be a partner with Santa Barbara County, oftentimes you ask us to jump and we say how high and we love our partnership with the county But we really feel strongly that our shelter programs and especially the Freedom Warming Centers literally saves lives and save lives this year.
And without the ongoing funding and the support to be able to operate, you know who knows what would happen if Good Samaritan was not here to provide those services? So I'm just respectfully requesting that there would be a mechanism to find funding for those programs. They're critical vital programs that serve the neediest of the needy in our community. Thank you
Sorry, I have a question based on that but not to you Sylvia. Thank you though. So during the budget workshops we allocated like close to $200,000 for warming centers is this additional funding for warming centers? Explain the
difference. It is additional. This was an expansion request on our part. The money for the warming centers just wasn't enough so the request was for enhancement to cover the cost of the warming centers
And we
approved that.
Not yet
Okay, so I've got a question after I guess just kind of how well we might as well ask it right now what the heck So how does something go from where's the decision made is it at the department level? Is that CEO level is our level or decision for like ongoing For example like a bridge house for ongoing operations When does that become part of our budget, as opposed to always coming back at Human Services Commission and asking for additional funding? That shelter's not going anywhere. It seems like that should just be ongoing.
Supervisor Lavin, you know through the chair. I agree with you I think we can come back and work with the CEO's office Much like we did with the libraries where we implemented this cost of living We can look at that. We'll have to work through the CEO's office on that It's not part of our it's not our program. It's a program we fund
Supervisor says you rated a great question And the question really is who takes ownership of it I think the department feels it's a program they fund but having the vendor basically our operator request funding every year so we can look at that and how that gets folded into the budget process as an expansion request from the department. Thank you.
Supervisor Hartman?
I didn't quite understand the answer about the warming center. The money that was proposed in our budget workshops, does that cover Good Sam's operating expenses for that? It does. So if that moves forward, that piece is covered? Yes.
2:11 – 2:165 turns
But the question is where we find those funds and it's either going to be from CDBG funds or it's gonna be from another funding source, potentially general fund. And so this is one of those opportunities where we look at this and go you know this is appropriate for CDBDG funding. And maybe we end up having a policy moving forward. We're off the top, these programs are funded out of CDBG and then we have the balance for the Human Services Commission to then allocate because I think that's what's really tough is and I had this conversation with Good Samaritan is that they're so successful. A lot of people don't think they still have the need right? They do such a great job in our community get forgotten sometimes or not usually the loudest. And when we give human services commission pot of funds, they're going to want to spend it in different places Targeted investments, but we need to look at it and go maybe We need to limit that scope a little bit and make sure that the most critical pieces of our safety net are taken care of first
Okay We still have two requests
We will now go to Ben Romo to be followed by Jamie Collins. Who's our final speaker then? I
Hi Mr. Chair, members of the board thanks for hearing me out today I wanted to speak on behalf of Good Samaritan Shelter for Bridge House and for the Warming Center funding. I don't work for Good Sam and they're not a client of my firm I just am a private citizen and a volunteer Who's had some who's been lucky enough to see these programs in operation throughout my career, but also just as a private citizen. It's just amazing what they do. I do want to just take a minute and just also thank County staff who and your team and you guys as well.
Just for doing what I think is a very admirable job on the issue of homelessness. In general, it's super challenging. It's so complex and expectations of our community for like solving the problem where there is no silver bullet is so high and unrealistic sometimes and you guys often just get bashed for it I think the county does a really good job. You guys are laughing you know what I'm talking about.
And then I also just want to say Human Services Commission funding is so important. It's so great to have a community, a group of community leaders who can come and bring their perspective into the county budgeting process and have a competitive process but as Supervisor Lavinino pointed out sometimes these core operational organizations that are really critical to the county's operations itself do need special treatment and special consideration. I wouldn't say special treatment from like, you know, from like an unethical government perspective or anything that's not what I mean but they need special consideration for the life-saving services they provide in the core foundational infrastructural role that they play in these complex systems and no organization in our county is represented in that role better Thank you, Mr.
Chairman. We learned about the need that often the warming centers are required to, people are required to leave during the day and you know the storms were just so severe that it was necessary to open that center. What Good Sam pulls off for our community is amazing. It was wild in there and in the midst of a wild storm. And I do just want to say, maybe I don't work for the organization but in my perception Good Sam saved the county's bacon on this program. They stepped up with the warming centers and Bridge House both those organizations were facing collapse at different points in our history and they came Rescue of the county and all of our communities not just the counties not it wasn't your malfeasance that led these organizations to become Unstable, but good Sam came and has the capacity as long as it's fully funded to really make that impact I don't know what the solution is in terms of like where the funds come from and how its divvied out.
I know It's challenging to go back to Human Services But this is a pot of or this is an organization that deserves to have that kind of surety in its funding so it can actually do the job I saw the county move mountains when the debris flow hit Montecito and that was amazing. These folks that Good Sam serves live the daily disaster of homelessness, and with tragic impacts in our community we should be moving mountains for them as well. Finally, I invite you to come camp with me any day of the week where it's 36 degrees. We can go out on the courthouse lawn And I backpack, I have very high-end gear. It's one of the few things, one of the few luxuries I'm able to afford because I'm not a rich guy but it is not scientifically freezing but it feels freezing when you're sleeping in 36 degrees so I also encourage the board to raise the temperature at which freedom warming centers are open.
So Bridge House and Freedom Warming Centers, I encourage you to direct your staff to fully fund them and find a way to do that.
We will now go to Jamie Collins who is our final speaker on this item. Jamie?
2:16 – 2:229 turns
Hello, my name's Jamie Collins I'm the Executive Director for Girls Link Carpinteria and our mission is to inspire girls to be strong smart and bold but since I've been there we've taken a different focus as well that's a little bit outside of our mission in some ways and really becoming a community hub Carpentria is sometimes a forgotten southern county tip of the iceberg in some ways, and we've seen with the recent disasters that we definitely get siloed and become an island.
So potentially with this investment it'll help meet the needs of our community members who are facing food insecurity in partnership with the Food Rescue Program that we work within the state of California. We've been doing the food rescue program for about a year now and we've saved over 60,000 pounds of food which is like a small herd of elephants to put it in perspective. And that food is distributed to community members through our Food Pantry Program and our Girls Inc. Program and our newly implemented Senior Center that we have on campus that serves youth and adults primarily that are low-income citizens in Carpinteria.
So I just really thank you potentially for the investment in helping us build a community center so that we can be resilient when the next climate disaster strikes, and so that we're set up for success. Thank you.
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Supervisor
Hartman? I just had some questions about the Human Resources Commission. Are we required to have one and are we required to give all this money to them to allocate?
Supervisor Hartman through the chair, I'll ask Laura to finish up what I think. When I came here the Human Services Commission did exist it was in CEO's office and they were allocating about a million dollars of general fund money to public service organizations now we picked that up there still in existence and it's about nine hundred thousand I think at this point that gets allocated The chair of the allocations committee is here, so you can answer any other questions. But it's a process where they review applications, the allocations committee and they make the recommendations to the full Human Services Commission. So there's not a lot of staff input in that process but it does exist and it's up to the board really if the board wants to continue with the Human Services Commission.
It's policy decision.
I want to say, I really appreciate their work and I don't want to disturb what they've done this time. But there is perhaps a disconnect between some of our essential partners and I would say the case has been made for Good Sam. And so I'm not sure where that funding should come from. So I'm just exploring this.
Yeah, you know I think we talked about Lori and I talked about maybe more public hearings just to get the needs assessment. Have the Human Services Commission do some of that but if you take a look at it, I had them put the programs up half of these programs are homeless related. So there's not a lot of money and Good Sam does excellent work, and they were great. They're a great partner But even the Human Services Commission is gonna struggle with 183 thousand and half of those programs are homeless related so do you put money in some of the other High-need areas in this community as well, so it's just not a lot of dollars to go around unfortunately I
My sense is if we want to in the future take it off the top that That is a something for consideration I would not think that it would be an opportune time to take that off the top right now because Would be sort of changing the recommendation on these before us Comments or emotion Supervisor caps
Chair Williamson, I just wanted to give my appreciation for this conversation. There's so much interest. This is such an incredibly important part of the work that we do is provide shelter and to these groups and thank you to Good Samaritan for being here today and a connection just was made when the public comment was being made about, you know, we've touted the fact that we had these 12 atmospheric rivers No injuries, well it's because of these organizations that have helped keep people off the street during massive rainstorms that we were able to thankfully get through such severe weather events without injuries or fatalities.
Connected for me, I know how important these programs are and all of the different funding. And I know we're struggling with how to best utilize the existing funds because we know that close to 20% of public school children in our county don't have permanent places so they're relying on these services. So I'm just supportive of Good Sam's work and this board's intention that's clearly been communicated today to make sure that the funds are allocated in the right way. And so I'm happy to make a motion with that support.
2:22 – 2:298 turns
So is your motion staff recommendation for these allocations?
Yes.
Is there a second? I'll second, and I have comment
too. Supervisor Lavinia. Yeah. I also wanted to say that I really appreciate my human services commissioners and some of the... I mean these decisions we're asking them to make are almost... There's nothing... What are you going to do? I mean they're way oversubscribed This one here, you know funds requested is close to $700,000 and we provide $170,000. So it's like all right in these showers of blessings I've worked with them new beginnings family violence prevention program of you know These are all great programs and we really appreciate the work that the Commission did And I'm not going to try to remix the bowl. I think what we need to do is And if I'm not mistaken on the warming centers, there were more at least three votes. I think there might have been four or five for adding that into the budget.
So I'm convinced they're going to be okay and then I think we're gonna take a good long look at Bridge House before we finalize our budget so I'm comfortable with where we're at right now so I can second that motion. Supervisor Nelson.
Yes, thank you Chair Williams You know I have no issue with the public services distribution and I think they're like everybody said these are some great programs there's no wrong answers in that list and That's what the county does is public services So it makes a whole lot of sense that we spread that out throughout the county through different programs Place you guys gonna hear me as a broken record. I have a lot of heartache and a lot of frustration on the CDBG capital side because you know many of these cities get a capital allocation and And they spend it in their city. We get a capital allocation per capita on our unincorporated residents, our carpentry residents, Solving and Buellton. And then we go spend it in a different jurisdiction.
So those tax dollars that are supposed to, or those dollars, the tax dollars yes, that come down on a per capita basis are diluted or actually moved to another jurisdiction that they don't really are connected to and so people that are in the unincorporated area receive a smaller percentage of CDBDG than their incorporated neighbors and I know you know we are elected by people that live in cities and in uncorporate areas but these are funds that specifically come and are attached to and formulaic based on that And so I will be a broken record up here. And as I think Supervisor Lavendier said, a bulldog for this type of stuff. These really should be spent in the areas that the funds are coming from not in these cities. We really need to put the pressure back on the cities like City of Santa Barbara should be funding the Santa Barbara projects.
We should be making a larger allocation towards the Bridge House is what I think here. You know we have a capital project that definitely fits it If we don't fund it from CDBG, we're going to probably have to pull a general fund or other sources that we might be able to use somewhere else. It limits our flexibility when we really need the pressure on the city of Santa Barbara and Santa Maria to spend their capital funds in their cities and we need to be spending ours in the under-corporated areas. So I currently can't support this and I'm hopeful in the future that we take a long look at that. Maybe that's a policy that we can bring back to board and vet out a little bit further It's a concern of mine. It's the same conversation we had on this sales tax.
It's going to be generated by unincorporated residents, but then we're thinking about spreading across the whole entire county and it's something I think that this board needs to start to think about.
Well, I would just say point well taken in some cases. But some cases are much dicier. Let's put Carpinteria. Carpinteria serves 14,000 people in the city but 20,000 people in the unincorporated area. So that's just different, right? It's also the facility for the unincorporated area and I would just want to take the opportunity To thank the three speakers and their roles for the safety net, and especially Liberty of thanking the incomparable Jamie Collins of Girls Inc Carpinteria because the investment in the kitchen is a sound one. I guess it's The age-old wisdom is if you want to save people's minds or their souls, you got to start with saving their stomach Especially with kids learning The nexus between learning and adequate nutrition is huge So I will be supporting the motion supervisor Hartman
Yes, I wanted to speak to Supervisor Nelson's point. I am somewhat in agreement with you on the sales tax but I'm not on this because we want people to live in cities where they're close to services especially those who are lower income and need transit, need easier access And so I, you know, trying to make it far-flung in agricultural and very rural areas doesn't make sense to me. So I'm supportive of this and I just want to emphasize that I am supportive of the commission and the motion.
all the hard, agonizing work that they've had to do. But I don't know how we distinguish essential partners, essential workers but Good Sam clearly is one and I think it's critical that if we've made some kind of a commitment which we heard we have to help with their expenses if they would take on these duties Then I think we have an obligation at least to keep up with cost of living. And how we do that, I'm not sure whether it's taking more off the top of these funds, whether it's trying to create a closer connection with the needs assessment between what the county priorities are and Commission views or whether it's some other source of funding I don't know but this question came up last year in a slightly different context with senior meals and And it's coming up again this year.
So We haven't solved this and I hope between this year and next year we can wrestle with it again
Supervisors through the chair, it'd be helpful for us And I hear what you're saying exactly and it's I think it's trying to match When we have these great commissions that are doing a lot of hard work and evaluating all these applications, which the Human Service Commission does. It's just trying to pair what they're looking at versus some of the board's priorities and matching those in a way that makes sense For the board and for the Commission's and for the department so if you could just put something in your direction for staff to come back and look At how we can do a better job of expressing priorities with some of these the work that we're doing the Human Services Commission or You know any of the commissions that are giving out funding.
That will help us it'll be a marker for us to remember to come back
2:29 – 2:327 turns
Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you Chair Williams just wanted to Say it's not just rural areas right we have a lot of very urban unincorporated areas that need services senior centers Libraries all these other different programs that should be invested in so CDBG dollars are supposed to go towards and so when we again dilute that out and spend it in incorporated cities That also get a CDBG allocation, that's my whole point. If we're going to throw it all together as big county pot and start to do it out there by need and how that might work.
Through some kind of joint powers, but what we get is specifically per capita based on our unincorporated residents and built in carpentry and solving And so I'm not actually against the carpentery and built-in investments It's a great deal for them by the way. You know they get we get $65,000 from Carpinteria But we're gonna give them three hundred thousand dollars and built in you know that we get twenty five thousand dollars And we're gonna give them 184 so it is a pretty sweet deal We need to start by thinking about that on the bigger picture, though. I would like to see the Santa Barbara ones again. Santa Barbara gets their own allocation of CDBG You know we already do provide a big safety net for them already with services They should be spending the capital dollars in their city and we shouldn't is my point I'm gonna make the same argument in Santa Maria So it's not and you know this isn't a South North County thing This is the City County issue and so I'm just going to say it.
I'll leave it there. I'm going to be voting no, but I also just want us to start thinking about that as we move forward in the future cycles about maybe really trying to create some balance if you will on this moving forward.
Okay, I think we're ready for a vote. I do want to reinforce Supervisor Labenino's point though that here's my budget document with the checkmarks and there's at least three check marks behind warming centers so I think we were working on that one.
Supervisor Sermon, you gave us your priorities. We definitely heard you and as Sylvia knows we are continuing to work in partnership to make sure that they are getting what they need to provide the services we've asked them to provide.
Supervisor Harper
so so I just wanted to be responsive to our CEO Miyasato Suggestion that we give direction. It doesn't have to be part of the motion, but I hope I hope it's captured in the summary of the meeting That we would like to look at how to How to wrestle with this issue of board priorities and how to communicate that more effectively to the Human Resources Commission I'm sorry human service
Great. Okay, let's vote all those this motion for staff recommendation All those in favor, please say aye. Aye opposed no 4 to 1 let's go to item 6 quickly Mr. Bonner you can you can start while they're doing the transition if you want at the end
2:32 – 2:413 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number six is from the Sheriff Coroner's Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the renewal of a sheriff office military equipment use ordinance.
Good morning, Chair Williams and board members. On behalf of Sheriff Brown and our entire sheriff's office team we appreciate this opportunity to bring this item to your board for review feedback and hopefully renewal of the required ordinance which addresses the important specialized equipment we possess and sometimes use in order to safely and effectively provide public safety services here in Santa Barbara County I'd like to start by introducing our team to you, who will be providing you with this presentation and who are here to assist in answering any questions you or members of the community may have.
First we have Lieutenant Joe Schmidt, who is our Sheriff's Training Bureau Manager, our Special Enforcement Team Manager commonly referred to as SWAT, and who serves as our designated quote unquote military equipment coordinator As required by California law and our policy. We also have Chief Administrative Officer Mark DiMaggio who oversees the Sheriff's Support Branch, which includes the Training Bureau.
So we're here today regarding Assembly Bill 481, which became law effective January 1st 2022 and is codified within California Government Code 7070 through 7075. This law addresses the funding, acquisition and use of quote-unquote military equipment by local and state law enforcement agencies but in reality addresses a wide range of important specialized equipment that is used by modern law enforcement agencies.
The core purpose of the law is to increase transparency accountability and oversight relating to the acquisition and use of this equipment. It requires each law enforcement agency to develop and adopt a policy addressing its acquisition, possession and use of those types of equipment. The law enforcement agency must obtain approval of that policy through its governing body via the adoption of an ordinance Which must be reviewed and renewed by the governing body on an annual basis.
Your board previously approved the original ordinance in May of last year, and we are here today for the required annual review and renewal. Each law enforcement agency must also prepare and make publicly available an annual report detailing its acquisition and use of quote unquote military equipment. That report is currently posted to the Sheriff's website and it is an attachment to the board letter for today's item.
And with that, I'll turn it over to Lieutenant Schmidt and Chief DiMaggio and we will remain here available to answer questions.
Good morning, Chair Williams and Supervisors. My name is Lieutenant Joe Schmidt. Thank you Undersheriff for the introduction. Just to add to some of the background, the Assembly Bill 481 also requires in the annual report to summarize equipment use Internal audits and community feedback. And on April 25th of this year, the Sheriff's Office hosted our very first virtual community engagement hearing where we presented the details of the annual report and equipment usage to the public.
Purpose of ordinance. So the Sheriff's Office is seeking approval from the Board of Supervisors for the continued acquisition and use of current and future specialized law enforcement equipment to consider any concerns the public may have about safety, civil rights, and the public's welfare, and to approve the current use policies which establish ongoing standards for safe de-escalation techniques utilizing police equipment in the application consistent with AB 481.
The ordinance and use policies will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval. And while the legislation has dubbed these items as military equipment, the reality is that the equipment we have been using for years has historically not been obtained from the military. The only military equipment per se that meets the definition in AB 41 that we have acquired for public safety use has been our MRAP rescue vehicle.
Purpose of Military Equipment Policy. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition and reporting requirements of military equipment. The policy defines military equipment as listed in Government Code 7070. Items such as unmanned aerial systems, command and control vehicles, kinetic energy weapons and specialized firearms are noted in the definition section of the policy.
An attachment to the policy is a Sheriff's Office Military Equipment Inventory. Government Code 7070 defines the policy as a publicly released document that governs the use of the equipment, including a description of the equipment, its purpose and authorized use, as well as the cost training and procedural rules for use. Our policy and inventory list outlines all these requirements in detail. And again, that's all listed publicly on our website.
The policy outlines the duties of the Military Equipment Coordinator within the Sheriff's Office, which is me, the Training Bureau Lieutenant. And the coordinator is responsible for tracking inventory, coordinating an annual community engagement meeting, preparing an annual report and establishing a procedure for the public to register complaints or inquiries about our equipment use. The policy also clearly defines the timeframes in which the Sheriff's Office will present the annual report and host community engagement meetings.
Impact on public safety. So the adoption of this ordinance and policy will allow the Sheriff's Office to continue to use the equipment necessary to protect the public and our deputies during day-to-day operations, and when we respond to critical incidents. Specialized equipment has been used by law enforcement agencies throughout the county and contract cities serviced by the Sheriff's Office.
The equipment helps to prevent the escalation of violent situations from becoming a threat to the safety of the community, law enforcement personnel, and the suspects. It helps limit and reduce high risk encounters with violent suspects, and provides lifesaving tools and options during natural disasters and other non-criminal incidents. The inventory list defines the purpose of each piece of equipment the Sheriff's Office currently deploys, and under purpose you will see such terms as preservation of human life, search and rescue operations, natural disaster response, reduced likelihood of injury to the public and law enforcement personnel, high risk apprehensions and mitigation of violent criminal behavior, less lethal force options, and de-escalation.
So when we presented this to the Board of Supervisors last year, this is their new acquisition for 2022. When we made the first presentation, we had submitted a grant request to purchase this drone. It's called the Brink Lemur S and it's specific for tactical operations interior. So any buildings or structure, this is used to help search and even communicate with a suspect inside.
Since our presentation last May, we were awarded the grant And we have taken possession of the drone. The grant was approved and the Sheriff's Office received the drone in late 2022 or UAS, and on December 6th of 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved acceptance of the donated Brink Lemur S. So justification for use of equipment. This specialized law enforcement equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
The proposed law enforcement equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties. The equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective And use of the military equipment complied with the use policy effective at the time it was used. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors receive and file a presentation regarding an ordinance readopting the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office Military Equipment Use Policy.
receive and file the annual military equipment report, consider and approve the introduction of an ordinance to readopt and amend the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office Military Equipment Use Policy. And read the title of the ordinance and waive full reading of the ordinance. That concludes our presentation. Thank you for your time. We're available for questions.
2:41 – 2:4521 turns
Questions from the board? Any public comment?
Chair Williams and members of the board, we have no requests to speak on this item.
Just want to particularly say that the drone, I mean use of drones is sort of we've gotta be doing it. It's a great thing for officer safety and for understanding the lay of the land and I fully support the use for the department. Supervisor Katz?
Yeah just remembered my question. I believe that you had a community forum on this. I applauded you for doing so and just wondered if you could speak to that for a minute.
Yes, Supervisor Capps through the chair. We hosted that it was a virtual meeting on April 25th last week we had several people attend there was no questions and during that presentation it was a similar PowerPoint to this however I actually we had pictures of the equipment to give the public a visual what this equipment looks like and hopefully demystify some of the questions or concerns specifically we know there's a lot Armored vehicles, specifically the Bearcat or the MRAP oftentimes are referred to as tanks. These are not weaponized vehicles, they're just meant to be armored rescue vehicles and during this presentation we talked about how many times this equipment was deployed or if it wasn't deployed at all during 2022.
Thank you. You just spoke to that, how rare it is that these types of equipments get used. Can you just talk about... I think it's important to state how de-escalation is the priority and these are the rarity important to state for the public?
Yes, Supervisor Capsley, the chair. That's really a lot of this equipment is used to deescalate what could potentially be a violent situation. Several calls involving the special enforcement team or the SWAT team we use several pieces of this equipment on even one barricaded situation and the entire mission was to slow things down and de-escalate to prevent even having to use force And a lot of times when this equipment was used, it did just that.
We like to think of distance equals time equals options so a lot of times with the use of a UAS or even a Bearcat were able to create that distance to get communication going and deescalate people and specifically we had an incident in Guadalupe that started off Very very dangerously with a suspect shooting a gun in the house and through the use of this equipment and slowing things down and that and the talent of our crisis negotiators. The suspects rendered without any use of force, so that was a great example of this working.
Thank you.
Can I get a motion to receive and file correct?
So moved.
I will second
all those
Mr.. Chair members the board I think it's all of the recommended actions. Oh
This does this motion contain all the recommended actions
a Through e
Thank You supervisor
And chair Williams members of the board sorry for the clarification, that's staff recommend a recommended actions a through s F
Thank you. It's there, yes.
Joan is usually the best and most meticulous of our motions so I usually look over there. Thank you, Joan. The motion and the seconder agrees to that?
Yes.
All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Thank you. Departmental item number seven and this will be the last before closed session.
2:45 – 3:024 turns
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number seven is from the Public Works Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the county active transportation plan.
Mr. Schnitt
Good morning chair, members of the board, Chris and Public Works. Today we have Mark Freelander with us who was responsible for managing the active transportation plan that we've been working on over the last few years. So I'm going to turn it over to Mark to do the presentation and we also have Miguel Nunez from Farron Piers who is a consultant we work with available at the end if questions come up.
Thank you, Chris. Yeah today I'll be presenting the Active Transportation Plan and I just want to note what better timing this wasn't planned but then to discuss this at the start of National Bike Month and Cyclemania which has kicked off. At its core this is an aspirational plan that focuses on active transportation within public right-of-way in the unincorporated communities of Santa Barbara County And it's really intended as an informational document that reflects current interest in better walking and biking infrastructure in our county.
And before I begin, when I say active transportation what I mean is any form of transportation primarily powered by human energy such as walking, cycling and non-motorized scooters or skateboards. Here's an outline for today's presentation. I'll walk you through the general layout of the document. Before I jump into that, I just wanted to provide a little context and some background as this was a big undertaking for our department.
The county doesn't have an existing plan that looks at both pedestrian and bike infrastructure county-wide but there's been a lot of planning in our region in related areas We have 11 community plans, including several multimodal corridor plans. We have a bike master plan from 2007. We have our regional active transportation plan that SBCAG prepared in 2015.
However, not every community has a community plan and some areas haven't been engaged in the planning effort in quite some time. The chart on the right was included just to kind of highlight that our county has a very extensive network of roads with over 1,600 lane miles throughout our area. To put that into context, that's more lane miles than the City of Santa Maria, Santa Barbara and all of our incorporated cities combined.
However, cities aren't really the best comparison for us as we have over 1,000 miles of rural roadways that are primarily two-lane higher speed roads that lock infrastructure such as curb and gutter sidewalks and bike lanes that you'd expect in cities in more urban environments. Just wanted to start with this chart to help illustrate why building new infrastructure is a real challenge for the county as we have an extensive existing road network that we must maintain first.
And I also want to mention that this entire project was funded by a grant from Caltrans, which staff applied for in 2019. So we really want to thank Caltrans for their partnership on this project. So, what we learned is it can be challenging to develop a plan for a large area with as much diversity as ours. Then you add on that we started this project at the height of the pandemic. Regional equity was a goal of ours and we had a set schedule and budget to work with so how we approached it was to break our county into six sub areas and help focus our study area and outreach efforts and ensure we're spending our time equitably throughout our region I also want to note that this is a conceptual planning document, so a lot of the projects don't have any advanced design beyond what's shown in the plan.
But we really tried to kind of strike the balance to make sure the plan provides enough information for the public to understand what's being proposed but not so prescriptive that there isn't room for changes in the future. This slide's just to demonstrate how we employed an iterative approach to our plan Since we didn't have an existing plan to work for, we started by brainstorming ideas with the public.
We then used those brainstorming sessions and data analysis to generate roadway segments we should be focusing on. And then we use outreach in our group of community advisors to help us refine the ideas before presenting them to the public for refinement. Here's our table of contents. The entire document is over 500 pages, so we definitely won't be covering everything in much detail today but I just kind of wanted to give you guys a high-level overview of the structure and the process.
The plan has been posted on our website for the last month and I also want to highlight our project website which has been our clearinghouse for surveys, project information, and plan updates. So aspirational plans need to think big. So we developed a vision statement to help us guide us through this planning process, I'll just read our vision statement. The county's transportation system should inspire people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike or roll for everyday transportation by providing comfortable connected and accessible networks and support programs and policies that encourages alternatives to single occupancy vehicle trips.
The ATP includes four main goals to help achieve the vision statement I just read. The goals are safety, engagement, impactful investment and multimodal connectivity. The plan also includes more specific actions the county can take to help achieve the ATP's goals such as monitoring safety metrics, creating a dedicated website on planned and programmed active transportation projects, supporting educational programs and increasing the availability of secure bike parking throughout the unincorporated areas.
So engagement was a big point of emphasis for us. At the onset, we formed a community advisory group comprised of residents, activists and people who work in the transportation sector. We met with this group five times throughout the course of the project and they served as our strategic advisors and a sounding board throughout the process. We also leaned on them to help get the word out about our outreach through their communication channels.
As mentioned earlier, we had to completely scrap our initial outreach plan due to COVID-19. Our main goal with outreach was to remain flexible and provide both in person and virtual opportunities to participate in both English and Spanish. Phase one took place in 2021 and was largely virtual and focused on existing conditions and user needs. During this phase, we launched a project website. We held six virtual brainstorm meetings We developed an online survey for people to provide input, and we rolled out a postcard pop-up that we deployed outside of businesses in Orkut, Los Olivos, and Summerland.
Phase two was in 2022, and we were able to shift to some in person outreach. We really focused this phase on the project ideas and the corridors that came out of phase one We had six in-person events in the summer of 2022 at some popular locations such as parks, farmers markets and downtowns where we knew we'd be able to interact with folks. And we launched a second survey as well to solicit feedback on these project ideas and placed placards at various locations throughout to generate more input and to direct people to our surveys.
Just some photos from a few of our outreach events. I just want to kind of take you into a snapshot of what the plan looks like and how the engagement findings would look like. This is an example of what Chapter 4 looks like, we tried to compile themes that we heard in each of our sub areas. We wanted to be transparent so we wanted to provide comments even if they were both positive and negative This is Koyama's example. In this community, we heard a greater demand for walking improvements compared to biking improvements with a particular emphasis around connections to schools and the town site.
Another example in the Lompoc Valley, we heard a lot of interest in better bike infrastructure particularly to Cabrillo High School and on roads that connect communities such as Parisma Road and Constellation Some of the key themes we heard throughout the county were that people want safe neighborhood connections to where they need to go. A desire for vertical separated facilities, meaning a lot of the folks we talked to didn't feel comfortable with just paint as protection.
We heard a lot of interest in more pedestrian connectivity in neighborhoods whether that be in the form of traditional concrete sidewalks or more informal paths like what's been built in Montecito and partnership with the Bucket Brigade We also heard concerns about safety on Caltrans highways and the barriers that their facilities can create for neighborhood connectivity in our region.
I want to note that the plan doesn't look at every single road intersection in the county, rather we developed a methodology to prioritize roads which we should investigate based on the factors shown on this slide We started with demand. Does the road directly serve key destinations? Is it located in a disadvantaged community or in an area with lower vehicle access?
Is there an existing infrastructure in the area that the proposed project could help tie into or fill a missing gap? We also looked at collision data dating back to 2010. Is there a demonstrated history of collisions involving people who walk or bike on these roads? The last factor was community input, Is it an area we heard a lot about during our engagement, or is it an area of known concern that our engineers and maintenance crews are already aware of?
There's a lot of institutional knowledge in this department that we try to encapsulate in the plan as well. Here's a map of the corridors we focused on in our plan. We've got close to 50 of these highlighted throughout our county, and I'll just touch on a few of them on the next few slides here. So in the Santa Maria Valley, for example, we looked at a number of corridors. These recommended improvements can vary from a multi-use pathway on Rice Ranch Road to sidewalk infill on Winter Road.
More vegetation, street trees and landscaping for slope stability was another noted theme in the Orchid area. We also heard a lot about traffic calming measures like curb extensions raised medians and upgraded crosswalks throughout the community San Yanez included walking and biking improvements along Rufufio Road, improved connections between the cities of Bulton and Solvang. Pedestrian improvements in commercial districts of San Ynez, Los Olivos, and Los Alamos were all noted in this project.
An example of what a project looks like in Chapter 5. First, we include some of the community feedback we received. We include notes from field visits including observations, constraints and opportunities and we overlaid that information over a base map with existing facilities and destinations shown as well as mapped collisions involving people who walk and bike This information really helped us form the existing conditions and user needs for our study area.
We then used this information to develop project recommendations. So in this example, you can kind of see a little cluster of collisions here where Sheffield and Ortega Hill meet and some comments about visibility in this area. How we took that information and then relayed that into a recommended project is shown on this slide. We used that input to then recommend an extension of the existing Class 1 bike path that leads to Summerland all the way to a three-way controlled stop here at Sheffield and North Jameson.
We worked with the Parks Department to include several previously identified recreational trails in the active transportation plan. Recreational trails outside of the public right-of-way were not the focus of our plan, but we did construct and we didn't conduct outreach related to these planned trails, but we did include them in their plan to help better position the county for future funding opportunities.
These projects will all be covered in more detail in Parks' forthcoming recreational master Non-infrastructure programs are critical to help support and encourage more people to use active modes of transportation. So Chapter 6 of the plan identifies some of the existing programs available in Santa Barbara County that help people support, help and support the infrastructure projects in the plan through education and encouragement to empower people choose alternatives to vehicle trips in their daily lives.
The plan includes rough construction cost estimates for most of the projects in the plan. The project costs are really for informational purposes and don't include soft costs such as permitting and environmental support. Our consultants helped us develop these estimates using unit cost quantities for the project concepts in Chapter 5 that, as you can see on the chart on the right we used, we also included Examples of grants that each project might be applicable for to help guide the public as well as staff in the future finding ways to get some of these projects funded.
That leads into implementation, so how do we build all these worthwhile projects and help implement plan? Well, it starts with having a plan and strong policies which are now requirement for most grant programs. Other ways to start chipping away at the plan is through conditioning, frontage improvements when applications come into the county, another good opportunity is to integrate smaller changes or sign-and-stripe changes as part of routine maintenance carried out as part of the annual roadmap.
The capital improvement program would be another good opportunity to include priority projects Finally, I want to note that the active transportation plan can be a living document and we should review it and refine it more frequently than community plans and make sure it reflects the current state of transportation which is a rapidly evolving sector. With that, we have our recommended actions for the board today which include to approve and adopt the ATP as well as find that the action is exempt from CEQA
3:02 – 3:0912 turns
Questions from the board? Supervisor Harper.
Well, first of all this is an enormous amount of work and a compilation of an amazing amount of information. The first question I have is on identifying you said you were coordinating with the Recreation Master Plan it's my understanding that they were identifying Specifically right-of-way corridors for bike paths, so I assume that you've incorporated. I know it's not an adopted plan yet So that was my question how much of it can you include in this?
given that status
Yeah, the timing was tricky. We did coordinate. We have Jeff Lindgren with Parks here and when we really focused on these trail projects, these big regional trail projects, we wanted to make sure that Parks kind of helped guided us on what to include as far as on street You know, within public right-of-way improvements. We don't have that list quite yet so I don't know if those were included directly. We developed this methodology at the outset on corridors but we have policies in general that support you know on street, on road pedestrian path improvements throughout our county
That's helpful and I think at least having the 50 priority corridors is really important. We really need to focus on active transportation. Even if we all are in electric cars, the congestion means we've got to get out of cars and we've got to be on our feet and bikes. And that's certainly the case in the Santa Ynez Valley where I live. We need strong policies and we need to figure out, as your report shows, how we're going to fund this because there's nothing really there.
So my first question goes to policies. Has to do with What do we? Sometimes were asked to abandon right-of-ways. Do we have strong policies in place to make sure that if it's on one of those priority quarters or When the rec master plan comes and we have right away Segments identified that are important for potential future trails Do we make sure we consult that before we would ever abandon a right-of way? I
Supervisor Hartman to the chair. Yes, there's a process of review that any abandonments go through that includes transportation as well as other divisions and one at one of the parts of the review we do is to ensure that it isn't needed for any current or prospective future use
And so these 50 corridors now are part of that review and when we do the rec master plan, that will be part of the review as well?
Correct.
Okay. The next question... Again, our policies I think are much limited by our budget. And you made that point very clear. I know that Ventura County has a program where when they maintain roads they expand the bikeway. We can't do that because it's too expensive but could we do it at least on some priority corridors?
Supervisor Hartman through the chair. The it's from an engineering perspective, it's feasible but those improvements are considered capital improvements so the funding is somewhat firewalled from capital maintenance funding. We can't use
SB 1 in other words for
improvements? I mean, you can legally do it. But the intention of the bill was to maintain existing infrastructure, specifically pavement condition primarily. It is a policy decision to some degree because you're trading off maintenance for capital if you're using maintenance funding to do capital stuff.
Yeah, I'm starting to think that we have so many road miles maybe we have to think we don't pave or maintain all of it. We'll have to make some hard choices. My next question has to do with development permits. It says here that the county can get a dedication of right-of-way from permittees where applicable and previously identified in an adopted planning document including the ATP. So this has been a question for CRATAC, and I believe it goes to County Council. When can the county exact dedications for development projects? And I'm not sure we need to answer it here, but I've been sent a number of emails and letters on that question. And you're saying it's something we can do. And CRATAC, to my understanding has been told they can't do it.
So I think we need to reconcile or have a fuller understanding of what's behind this. And I guess I'll go back to county council at some point in the future and ask about it. The other thing, have we, I assume in developing this plan we've looked at other jurisdictions and every creative thing that they do to try to okay, and this is the best we can come up with so.
Somehow we need to figure out how to focus more attention and more resources on these issues. I think reducing our GHGs, improving our health, reducing congestion it all hinges on this and with micro mobility there are many ways that people can get around so I'm left with a lot of questions despite all the information that you've compiled
3:09 – 3:1518 turns
Supervisor Caps
Thank You chair Williams. I my questions Center on bike safety we just celebrated Earth Day I know that so many people in this community thankfully are committed to reducing their carbon footprint and I know that safety On bikes is a probably the top concern and I appreciate it you could tell by your level of outreach with the public comment that we did receive from Summerlin Citizen Association, UCSB Chair of Geography. And I took particular note of the principal of San Marcos High School who apparently just met with because a student bicyclist took it upon himself to organize a meeting which made me really happy to hear that level of activism in high school with the focus on bike separations. Can you just talk about that a little bit? And then my next question goes into e-bikes
Supervisor Caps for the chair. Did you want clarification on the San Marcos project?
Yeah, that would be great if you wouldn't mind just briefly
sure So we we met with this was organized through move Santa Barbara County and as part of their teen justice program We met with The principal as well as the student and a couple of their staffers, as well as myself and our traffic engineer Gary Smart last week. And they pointed out we got there at 730 in the morning looked at school drop off. They pointed out some of the challenges with people blocking the existing bike lane on Hollister.
And we went back and we looked at our plan. And some of the improvements would be to add those flex posts that you see throughout the city, to kind of physically prevent people from using the bike lane to drop students off as well as an upgrade to the crossing at Magna Vista which is there's currently a rapid flashing beacon that you hit but Hollister is a wide High volume road and based off of FHWA guidance that the real countermeasure should be a pedestrian hybrid beacon, which is something you'll see in Old Town Goleta.
Sort of right in front of the school district and then also by the Trader Joe's shopping mall on Kyrie out looks like a signal so we did receive a Measure A grant to to upgrade that intersection as well. So a couple of the improvements that are coming.
And those will be forthcoming?
Yes,
yes.
Those are funded.
Thank you and then does this plan you mentioned at the beginning that to describe the acronym of ATP that this is human power. Does that does this encompass electric bikes? How do you deal with that? I have a lot of questions about electric bikes.
Yeah, electric bikes are Interesting because they sort of tow this line, right? There's still bikes that require and people are exposed and vulnerable road users on electric bike whether they're motorized or not. But they can achieve speeds much faster than traditional You know human-powered it's like so it's an ongoing discussion. We don't have For the purpose of our project we didn't exclude ebikes from that consideration and we didn't you know propose an ebike dedicated facility versus You know a non motorized bike facility, we just followed state guidance and state law as it pertains to ebikes
So that actually answered my last question about jurisdiction, because I was at Earth Day at the elected leaders booth and a couple questions were raised about who governs electric bikes. Why aren't there licenses? Why aren't helmets required? Is that something...I just would love a governance answer to that is where does that fall? Is that state law? That's something that we could do?
So Supervisor Caps, we have Gary Smart here to answer that if it's a detailed question. But in general, we follow the definitions that are by the state of what is considered a bicycle versus what is considered a motorized vehicle. And most of the e-bikes that you see out there today fall under the threshold and the governance for being classified as a bicycle, essentially. So it's under the same
governance as bicycles. So meaning their licenses aren't required and helmets aren't required?
They have I think they have, Carrie can correct me if I'm wrong but I think they have just the same general rules as bicycles in terms of all those things.
Okay.
I believe the law is that anyone under 18 has to wear a helmet regardless of whether it's A motor a electric bicycle or a normal bicycle, right? It's but it's over 18. It's discretionary Is that what the law is Gary? That's a great question
for my household
3:15 – 3:2410 turns
Chairman yeah, that is correct 18 and under are under 18 has to wear a helmet there is different classifications of electric bikes the ones that the younger kids are allowed to ride Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you and I don't want us to veer too much from this program, but I do see this as an issue to grapple with of these dividers are being put in for a traditional bike. But yet the lanes are being used by basically... a moped in the sense. And so I just have some, a lot of growing concerns as particularly as a mom this is something that a lot of parents talk about because their kids are getting these e-bikes and they're quite young and not licensed. And I noticed too with the, I believe with the ones that are made, the ones you can rent don't require Helmet or don't have helmets and don't require them. And so anyway, just an issue here I am interested in trying to figure out where it lives in terms of governance.
Could I jump in here? Please. I serve with Assemblymember Bennett chairing the cycle CalCOAST and we had a major presentation from the city of San Diego which is doing a lot in this area As well as the CHP, which is developing new regulations and training videos around electric bikes. And Ken Epperson in Traffic Solutions has done present a little bit before SPCAG but it's an emerging issue for sure. Thank you.
Well, I'll go next. Number one, I love the visionary aspect of these planning documents and the practical way it leads to projects. And I even like it that it's a visionary statement. Ambitious that it's easy for detractors to then take that mission statement and show pictures of where our infrastructure doesn't meet that Because I actually think that that's part of the process of making sure our infrastructure matches that reality so In step with that, I wanted to get my head around a little bit the The relationship between this document and when we encourage Caltrans to do improvements on their areas the right way. It's relevant, right? Is that the case?
What we put here is relevant because Caltrans is a partner and sometimes listens to us,
Chair Williams, yes that's basically the way they work. And these plans you can see there's one of the reasons as Mark talked about we have the recreation plan in and one of the reasons we call these out on Caltrans facilities even though we don't have any jurisdiction there is so that they have that in their toolbox when they're applying for grants. They can say well it's in this plan and we can say well it's in that plan and each agency So I guess my request for the day is that
I know you had a process, you had people involved in that process. Sometimes people don't show up with that process and we all got a late letter from Mission Canyon Association. It is the corridor between Alamar and Mission Canyon is terrible access for pedestrians or bicyclists. So it is a request from the neighborhood and I would love it if we added it aspirationally to the document so that we could encourage Caltrans to do some improvements on that corridor.
So chair Williams that has been historically a request it's come in the past. So I think it would fall within the parameters of on the typical kinds of projects we put in. I think sort of vehicle to do that might be just in their recommendation to recommend approval with minor modifications as directed by your board or something like that.
Thank you Mister Stanton is that agreeable to the board? It's not really something that we would spend money on but we're trying to prioritize projects adjacent to our jurisdiction for Caltrans. I do think we have some public comment and Mr. Wentz, I tried to get you to be able to do it by phone but fortunately you live close enough That maybe you could get here by alternative transportation if you got here this close. Mr. Wentz?
Chair Williams and members of the board, yes we have five requests to speak. We'll begin with Scott Wentz and then we will go to Zoom with Miguel Nunez. Scott?
Quickly, 99% of my appearances before the Board in SBCAG have been walking. Scott Wins representing Cars Are Basic. I belong to the Merritt College of Sports Medicine, have been since 1981. I'm a researcher, presenter and speaker. I'll tell you right now that I can tell you active transportation is a failure. I have watched the Merritt College of Sports Medicine put forth massive programs for this actual concept and in fact it hasn't worked.
So what are you going to do now? You have a classic example just going right up Garden Street from this location called the St. Francis Traffic Plan. It failed massively, it was backed by the Bicycle Coalition, it was backed Bungalow Haven group, it was backed by a whole bunch of people. It hasn't worked. The city of Santa Barbara has at the time that Chair Williams was on the City Council 25 miles of interconnected bicycle paths. They now have over 40 to 45 miles of interconnected bicycle paths and they have fewer bicycles on the street.
You have fewer walkers. A former transportation planner for the City of Santa Barbara said you can't get people out to walk five minutes to go to work, he's absolutely true. You have a city council that just won't listen to the demographics. They created a Brown Act violation just last November when they voted for the Westside Capital Improvement Project that includes bike paths on the Mesa Bull bouts and bike paths on the Lower East Side. Bike paths and other items on the Upper West Side, and they don't seem to care. The city of Goleta did exactly the same thing approximately, let's say January, no excuse me December of last year.
Brown Act violations, they don't care. They're not looking at the definitions. We have a problem here and that problem happens to be the fact that even the state of California is now admitting that this is not working. City of Culver just said we're taking out most of our bike paths that we just put in. Playa Del Rey approximately two years ago had a rebellion in its residence and said, we will recall you if you don't take this stuff out.
San Francisco's seen an absolute cratering of its transportation grid and its capital, excuse me, it's businesses in the area because that doesn't work. It's one thing to fix sidewalks and allow people to have a safe place to walk. It's another thing to hammer the streets, and I'm probably over my time but I can't see the timer so 10 more seconds okay. And by the way it's starting to rain so I get to walk back in the rain.
3:24 – 3:304 turns
We will now go to Zoom and Miguel Nunez is not logged in so we are going to Claire Weinman, to be followed by Kathleen Rosenthal. Claire?
Hi good afternoon do you copy? Yes we can hear you please proceed. Okay perfect thank you. Good afternoon my name is Claire Weinman and I'm the president of the Grower Shipper Association of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo County We commend the county for putting together a beautiful and detailed plan to improve safety and facilitate active transportation in known problem spots, especially in urban areas throughout the county.
In spirit of safety we will restate our concerns with the proposed inclusion of the Santa Maria River levee trail in the Active Transportation Plan for the reasons that we've previously outlined and would not support its inclusion in the plan. To Supervisor Hartman's question, we've also spoken previously to the mixing The trails project section of the active transportation plan lacks the same level of detail and review as the rest of the plan, and we ask you to defer the inclusion of this particular section at this time.
We would like to express the need for additional information on the proposed trails, especially on the Point Sal Guadalupe to Beach Trail in the westernmost portion of the Orchard Creek Trail. We believe it's premature for the board to include these in the active transportation plans since there's so much detail lacking These trails are a better fit for the recreation master plan or Thank you for your consideration and responsiveness to these Just wanted to applaud and encourage continued safety improvements on last mile issues, especially safe to schools. And encourage continued addressing of things like the gaps in the sidewalks. Even things like having trash cans and recycle bins on the sidewalk can create obstacles, especially for little legs to make it safely to school.
So thank you all for your efforts and the opportunity to comment. Thank you.
We will now go to Kathleen Rosenthal to be followed by Heather Joycha. Kathleen?
Good afternoon, Supervisors. My name is Kathleen Rosenthal. I'm with the Santa Barbara, excuse me, Santa Ynez Valley Riders and our coalition SAVE Santa Barbara County Equestrian Trails. I am also speaking as an individual because we reviewed this ATP and we are very glad to see that there was many, many areas where we would like to see trails. And we would also like to commend you for having mentioned of equestrian concerns in this ATP. I know it's for people and I know it's for transportation but as the questions up here in the San Ynez Valley have the same issues as the bike riders do down there Santa Barbara caps we wish to have separation we wish to have area where we can have slower areas to ride. I did want to mention in the ATP on page I believe it's page 9 there's a picture of the new walking path that was put in along refugio road and you'll see on the right hand side a walker And then on the left hand side, you'll see where the future equestrian trail is going to be.
And this in our particular area could be a model for trails along some of these corridors and would serve everyone in the valley area. I did want to commend and congratulate Chris Jeff Lindgren Mark Freelander and the consultants that worked on this. For collaborating so well and for taking the public comments into consideration, we recognize that there is a intersection between transportation and our real concern which is recreation trails for equestrians. And we are happy to see these, the Parks Department and the Transportation Division work so well together. And we hope this continues through development of the Recreation Master Plan.
We also as a final thing wanted to mention that we as equestrians are especially interested in the river trail and the, um, also the bicycle component and the hyper pedestrian component of that project. We fully support it and we would like to see that happen as soon as possible. So that concludes my comments and thank you very much for producing such a wide reaching and quality document. We really appreciate it. Thank you
3:30 – 3:3414 turns
We will now go to Heather Deutsche, who is our final speaker on this item. Heather?
Greetings and thank you. My name is Heather Deutsch and I'm the executive director of MOVE Santa Barbara County. I also happen to be one of the members of the community advisory group for this project. The move and our members and supporters urge the County Board of Supervisors to adopt the county of Santa Barbara's active transportation plan. As has been mentioned, the vision states that our transportation system should inspire people of all ages and abilities to walk bike and roll and to do so by providing comfortable connected and accessible ≫ Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Barbara and I'm the director of the transportation network.
So we know that to focus on or prioritize motorized most often single occupancy vehicles in our transportation system is tremendously expensive. It has dire We, it's also been noted and you may say that in a large county with vast rural areas providing walking and bicycling systems that are comfortable connected and accessible is near impossible. But luckily we don't have to reinvent the wheel well there may be limited examples locally In the state or even in the country, the rest of the world has moved forward cost effectively with this vision with success. So we know we can do it. We know it's not just about the money. It's about how we prioritize and focus our resources.
So we just wanted to say that it's really time for the county to provide transportation choice for all of our citizens and we hope you will adopt this plan as an important step towards this goal. Thank you
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Is there a comment or a motion? Supervisor Hart.
I'll move A and B on today's staff report on the active transportation plan. And I'll second.
You know, second is the maker motioner and second are willing to add the court or
Canyon.
Yeah that foothill between Alomar and Mission Canyon?
Yes, absolutely as an addendum mark however you can accommodate it given that you've already got it really well formatted
if I could make a recommendation chair, it would be great if you could include just sort of broader motion to make Any small minor changes as well as this more major one?
And Chair Williams, members of the board. My apologies for the interruption but I did just want to note for the record my office did just receive that letter from the Mission Canyon Association and have uploaded it online and we are in the process of getting copies so that will be available to the Board and the public. Thank you.
Okay. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor please say aye.
Aye.
Opposed? We are now going to recess for closed session. Would you like to give us a preview?
3:34 – 3:343 turns
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board. We have one item of existing litigation emerging acquisitions versus Leslie Wells in her official capacity as deputy director of Santa Barbara County Resource Recovery and Waste Management. It's a central district of California case it's federal. And we also have anticipated litigation deciding whether to initiate civil litigation one case.
What's the time estimate?
Mr. Chair, I think we can do this in 30 minutes.
4:15 – 4:336 turns
I'm reconvening the Board of Supervisors meeting back from closed session. Can we get a report from closed session?
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board. The board met in closed session one item of existing litigation, emerging acquisitions versus Leslie Well in her capacity and one item of anticipated litigation deciding whether to initiate civil litigation and the board took no reportable action.
Thank you. We're going to our last item of the day, departmental item number eight.
Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number eight is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a discovery process improvement update and request for proposals RFP for digital evidence management system also known as DEMS.
Judge Ellsworth?
Chair and board members and CEO Yasato, I am happy to come before you today to bring to you kind of a dual thing. And that is a report back on one of our initiatives that we've been working on for a very long time and I will explain why we worked on it for a very long time in this presentation as well as a request at the end of that in order Present to you the option to support a release of an RFP.
So here's what we're going to talk about in the next few minutes like to share with you our ongoing efforts to improve the county's evidence discovery process. You've heard the acronym DEMS, that's the Digital Evidence Management System. And because it is such a mouthful I will resort to using an acronym. I have to tell you if you can look and take like my grandson likes to do as a photograph for your memory in your mind by just clicking this moment in time behind me is seated the shoulders upon which I come to you today. This is a collaborative effort between all criminal, county criminal justice partners. I have behind me much of the team as well as the leaders from those teams that have really gone through this last 18 months plus in a collaborative effort and sitting next to me is Sarah Gill who has been an integral part of shepherding the cats and corralling us all in times of trying work this out and come before you.
I will do a highlight or an overview of the business case which you have attached to the board letter that was sent, and also give you an update for how we got to where we are now. So let's put some context on this. Why did we come to this point and why do we work so hard along to do that? Evidence or what we call discovery is now increasing. I know back when I was an attorney and doing some conflicts panel work, I would just get a thin file out of paper from The other attorney, and now with cell phones and photographs and all kinds of digital evidence you can imagine. It's not a stretch to know that there is a complexity of the electronic digital evidence and it has increased with body worn cameras etc., etc.
We now currently literally use CDs, DVDs. I don't even know if everybody in this room knows what CDs and DVDs are anymore. They have become a thing of the past in most of our streaming society but still here for evidence exchange you're literally walking files taking over Blu-rays and DVDs We don't have consistency in the names of the files. We don't have consistency in how those different individual items come to each department, and there is that lack of integration which is key. to get discovery or evidence at a much more rapid pace. So we have a desire to leverage that technology and technology that now may be available to us, that's our exploration and what we're asking you all to foray into with this.
With that increase in electronic discovery, we need to look at a procedure that can be institutionalized and processes Technology can help us handle this growth and more than just that, come up with a strategic longevity plan so we're not just crisis management instituting crisis management tools. Originally this came as a request from the DA's office for, a request for a DEMS.
And that started our journey because as we looked at this and they invited us, the DA's office invited us to take an opportunity to do a demo with them. We said wait, this may be a much bigger fix. And when I say fix it is as a component of again strategic plan So that began the collaborative process. And when we started this, rather than just being a month or two months like some of our other initiatives, we needed to take that travel together and as we all walked together kicking and screaming at times that was usually me to work through this innovate SBC process we were able to do some pretty amazing things. We wanted a transformative solution that can be plugged in with a new procedure and other technology solutions as needed, and we wanted to be able to Look to those justice initiatives that we brought to you previously, as well as Michael Wilson's jail population levers.
So we believe discovery is the keystone in addressing many of our problems and that's why we began to foray an adventure into the journey to bring to you this request for RFP today. Electronic discovery is quite simply the electronic aspect of the discovery process. And as you can imagine, in any criminal case today there is a lot of it. It exists in every single case and it has from the least of the complex misdemeanors still has components of that electronic evidence that is required to very, very complicated cases that may take just gigabyte upon gigabyte of information. The evidence is central to and affects all of the decision making in both prosecution and defense. I think what I want to underscore here is getting all of the discovery and getting it earlier so it's not just a matter of that has to do with evidence is important obviously And having it exchanged is important, and having it exchanged in a way that we—is integral.
But in order to get it in the hands of those individuals that need it sooner to start unraveling some of the problems that we have in other areas is critical. It can be received from many sources, from different law enforcement and it can come in many different ways. And what we're doing is starting that process by looking at DIMS as a module of solution for the strategic plan to be put into place at this time.
So we took everyone through this Innovate SBC process and this was a consultant facilitated, easy for me to say, facilitated session Multiple sessions. And in this, we had everybody take a good look interior to look at redundancies, to look at pain points, to look at problems that could be solved and we had some quick wins. One of our quick wins frankly was and Sarah correct me if I'm wrong but we discovered that in the Sheriff's Department they discovered during this process that there was a file cabinet that every time some kind of evidence had Logged or processed the person would have to get up from their desk go into the other room We'll get a file book out going to the other room Get the the file to put in the processing through and then come back now that might sound like a silly thing But when we moved that file cabinet, we saved a few minutes And when you take a look at how much evidence that goes in and out of the law sheriff's office Those few minutes are important So those efficiencies and the long-term wins that we're looking at, and the opportunity to explore them really gave us the presence of mind to work collectively together.
And the teams that are seated behind me in their leadership have done an outstanding job of this. They've come together. I want you to know that they helped write and edit the board letter as a group They helped write and edit the business case, and they helped participate in every bit of this including seeing PowerPoints ahead of time which I think is pretty outstanding given the type of collaboration you've asked to.
We need to continue this work on a countywide discovery process is maybe one of the words but also procedure. So as we create and the opportunity to have that dims instituted explored looked at and match with Transparent procedure for discovery, we start really laying the foundation for what the future of Santa Barbara can look like in the criminal justice system.
So we're coming with a request and that request is for a DIMS system. We've talked about that it's in your letter but DIMS essentially is software platform that we hope will automate and streamline everything from the ingestion to the distribution throughout the entirety of the lifecycle of discovery evidence in that case. It's absolutely requisite that whoever ends up with this RFP being A sign to them is that the digital evidence must be secure. It must be efficient. I cannot underscore efficiency enough as it turns to handing over of that discovery as soon as possible, and it has to be legally admissible. It also breaks down those silos, as you can see, so that we can work together with not only the sheriffs but in the future other law enforcement so that we have truly a countywide opportunity in this long-term strategic plan.
So what are our goals? We do want to streamline the digital evidence distribution, I think we've made that clear. We want to ensure accurate and timely processing and sharing of that discovery. We want to improve security practices—that's really clear, and that chain of custody is ever on our mind. We want to promote the earlier resolution of cases. That earlier resolution part has its tendrils, if you will, in absolutely everything from the levers to the other initiatives if discovery all of the discovery is handed over earlier and shared between the law enforcement with DA, DA to defense then we will find that we're able to have better outcomes in many of the different areas that we've had concerns. We believe there's going to be a savings, a human resource savings and also a quality of work savings.
I mean literally getting out of your seat to walk into another room every single time you have to log certain materials to being able to do it by pushing buttons or inputting a few buttons is pretty miraculous and pretty necessary at this time. The project management was provided by General Services, ICT. We have to thank them. The team did an incredible job and continues to do so. I cannot boast enough about the collaborative process between our Sheriff's Office, our District Attorney and Public Defender who are—I really appreciate them coming today. Their leadership has come and they're seated behind me.
The county executive office, probation and courts all had a say in this. And we're part of the learning process that we've gone through. Why did it take so long? Well, we had to figure out what our problems were. We had to figure out what our fixes should be and we also had to come together so that we could start to create A house, I would say of efficiency and access to justice. So what we've done now is we've done the grading and I think that DEMS is the next foundation and then we should frame it in procedures that are able to be transparent and then we can use technology to start to wire a smart home if you will.
Our outcome is that the RFP should reflect the complex needs of all the parties, including not only the departments but those individuals that are accused and those victims and their families as well. Here's our current state, I've already explained it. We manually do things and there's problems with those things. There's problems with the chain of custody. There's problems with the prosecution getting late discovery or discovery that they didn't know about. There's problems with the sheriff's department having a deluge of information given to them Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
to be shared in its entirety and more timely. What is our future state? The goals, what we're working toward is to really automate in a cloud-based solution. DIMMS is a very big part of that solution. The other solutions are as I have indicated procedure working together looking at expansion of technology in other areas that we may need Secure solutions that will be completely compliant. I have to say that under the leadership of once Chief Heitman, what do I call you now? Ms. Heitman?
Our own Ms. Heitman we have been able to really pull this into our criminal justice partners meetings and work through that as well. We need to get discovery to be received sooner by everyone And this will impact us in a positive way in the justice system as a whole. The impacts fiscally, projected costs will be determined through the RFP process. We have set aside 1.3 in one-time funds—money I fumble over.
When we get to talk about the money, it's 1.3 has been set aside and once those funds are depleted we will work with the CEO's office and the departments to build ongoing costs into their ISF rates also we hope to be seeing that resource you know savings that we are boasting about so our recommended actions for this learned board today is that you receive a file of this presentation You provide any direction as appropriate, authorizing the release of the RFP and determine that it is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Our next steps would be after you issue that final RFP is to really get to work on that collaboratively And continue our work on the discovery process and long-term strategic plan. Return to you as a board, so all we're asking is the permission to do the further exploration if you will, return to you with those recommended DEM software and implementation contracts as well as a procedure by which we will go forward.
At this time I have behind me, I think the leaders of these different departments and would ask if they have any comments prior to your questions and answers. They've come to share with you their thoughts as well. With your permission.
4:33 – 4:399 turns
The one thing I want to emphasize on behalf of today the team is this is not a shiny new toy. This is an absolute necessity for us to move forward every individual accused of a crime has a constitutional right to timely accurate and complete discovery outside of throwing a whole lot of manpower at the problem, which still has problems with efficiency and accuracy.
This is the means that we are going to solve that problem and whatever evidence is out there, the defense has a right to, and it is the sheriff's duty. It is the district attorney's duty to assemble that in a complete fashion and present it to the defense. And until all that information, what we call discovery is presented to the defense, they can't possibly represent their client's interests fully and adequately. So I just want you know, we are not looking to do something cool. We are looking to do something necessary.
Thank you.
Questions, comments from the board? Supervisor Laminina. Thank you
Mr. Chair. Well it was interesting I looked over at our other board members when you all came in and you guys look like you're all having a great time actually better than we were having a closed session but then the fact that you're all sitting on the same side I think just sends a huge message to us That whatever we need to do, we need to re up. Judge Ellsworth because I don't know what it is, but she's got some kind of magic sauce. This is just another step in the initiatives that I think everybody has identified of how to improve the system.
I think this is interesting because it does touch every single different department you know inside inside this group and so I'm in full support It was interesting. I was on the radio Monday and when I was speaking with a gentleman that kind of goes over our agenda, he's talking about how would this affect somebody? And it's shocking to talk to so many people out in the community that don't realize that there are people in jail that haven't been convicted yet. That's still a concept for a lot of people that they don't understand. They're awaiting trial. This hopefully will speed up some of the flow through there and get people to court a lot quicker, and I'm really excited about it.
Supervisor Hart?
Well, I too am excited to see the collaboration and partnership on this critical issue. And I'm very supportive of the recommended actions. I just have some questions trying to think through to the future. This is kind of an illustrative case of how our countywide IT works with a set of partners And especially as we have to expand this to probation, the courts, the police.
Having that in mind so you've said that you're already coordinating to some extent but maybe this is a CEO question or for ACEO Heitman?
So let me just preface this because we've been talking a lot about our interdepartmental efforts. And so on this, which is specific to the DEMS and the digital evidence but ACL Hyman as many of you know have been working for many years on the Criminal Justice Data Committee and she's expanded that to change the name to just the County Data Committee but maybe if you could speak a little bit about that?
Thank you Chair Williams, Supervisors, C.O. Miyasato, Tanya Heitman Assistant CEO of Republic Safety and Health and Human Services. As C. O. Miyasato mentioned we have been working with the Criminal Justice Data Committee for quite some time to really provide sufficient infrastructure to allow data sharing across the criminal justice agencies and have seen some really exciting progress in that area In my role at the CEO's office, I now have invited all of the Health and Human Services departments to the table as well. And we are expanding rebranding ourselves to encompass the work of Health and Human Services. It's going to be important not only for efforts like DEMS but also as we venture into CareCourt, CalAIM, IST Solutions They all intersect the department's ability to share information, share data with each other but also create efficiencies and ensure that they're working collaboratively together.
Today we have not only the department heads but some of their individuals in their IT departments and these staff have been crucial to the work of the Data Committee thus far Because they now have a much broader understanding of each other's capabilities, case management systems and where the pain points are. So we are very optimistic that this effort will allow us to go so much further so much faster. The courts are already a partner in that as well and our city police departments we would like to incorporate as soon as possible.
And if I might have a follow-up, so this will be going forward. Do we anticipate having to look back and digitize evidence from prior cases especially as state laws require us to go back and look at some of those? Is that another big workload in the future?
I can safely say that it is always in these projects an issue of how far back you go in digitizing and accumulating prior cases. But, I don't know if the District Attorney's Office might want to speak more specifically about what their plan is?
4:40 – 4:5125 turns
Thank you. So on the digitizing part of the older cases, most of that is now stored in Iron Mountain it would be virtually impossible for us to bring that in and cost prohibitive. Deepak could answer that question because we've explored that but we do have a lifetime duty to hold onto our clients files and so everything as we continue to go forward is being digitized and electronically stored, and that is why Box has been part of our solution as far as our case management system is concerned.
So if I might, so the racial justice ones that you have to go back will you digitize those now that you have to look at them again or you just deal with paper files and whatever else you have?
Given the volume of matters that we anticipate having to review, I don't have a strategic plan for that yet. Deepak Bhai and Angie? Deepak you want to answer that? And I apologize but it's going to be thousands and thousands of cases.
And from our perspective we basically are looking to repurpose our old file storage room so we are We have gone through and basically gone paperless. There may be a few old cases, but do we have any files left
Jose?
Yeah so just about everything we have has been scanned and downloaded. Thank you
Supervisor Hartman, through the Chair. What our focus has been on is essentially digitize as needed so all of our files currently are all electronic and all digital and as we have the need to go back and pull files from however far back hardest part is actually finding those files Because there was not a organized structure how they were stored. And once we find those, we digitize them so that way our staff is able to access those files as needed and so that's been our approach and I think similar to the DA's office is as we need to digitize archived files will do so.
So now you'll have some kind of a framework that there's a common way of structuring how you file it so anybody can get access, it'll make sense?
Correct, I think I don't want to speak for the DA's office but whatever we're doing in terms of archiving older files where our organizing them based on our current structure and again the dams will allow us a way to organize everything centralize it and pass around from agency to agency.
Supervisor Hart, I mean Supervisor Katz.
Thank you. Thank you Chair Williams. Yes the energy and excitement is palpable so thank you for the enthusiasm. I just have some kind of questions about how's this actually going to work? You know it means training a lot of people I imagine. I don't know how many dozens probably of people to actually do the implementation. So if you could just give me one example of a procedure that indicates the commitment to not just Start something that was long needed but actually make it work and make it work for people that you're trying, that we're serving.
So I think that is a great question in that part of our exploration with the Dems with this RFP will be a better understanding of just How many people need to be trained to be able to input? But I think the greater, the bigger part of that is making us think in terms of what is our overall plan with procedure. We need to come to a consensus as to when it's received, how it moves from place-to-place. As far as retraining of staff, it is my understanding and please Jose or Deepak or Angie or any of you correct me that it will be a matter of input will still require humans to do it but a lot of that work will then Consumed by the Dems and be able to go forward through that system. That's part of why we would have the software so for example this issue of That Deepak just spoke to and and both Mr..
Savarnak and Miss McCougar is that at least we would have the same file number And at least we would have a way to pull it down by just instruction of how to get your files and things So there would be Training with regard to part of that. John?
Supervisor Capps through Chair Williams. When the slide showed automation, the digital evidence management systems, the ones that are up and functional now actually do a lot of that with automation so these systems will automatically access for instance the Sheriff's Record Management System every section of body worn camera footage that is logged to an event number Every dispatch because these are all items of discovery every Dispatch log will then automatically through this system be downloaded into a folder and some of these are Currently manual functions. Somebody has to find the body camera Download it So we will get then everybody wearing camera footage.
Associated with a specific incident number, every supplemental report that is submitted under a certain case number will automatically populate to the folder. These are things that would manual processes sometimes get missed. They have cost us mistrials cost those problems At trial cost us to fall short of fulfilling our constitutional duties to the accused. But with these systems, we're actually ensuring that doesn't happen and it won't be because these manual processes will be eliminated.
I appreciate the district attorney bringing up body cams because that's something that's in the news at least nationally. And you, I also just want to understand how, you know, I understand that the different branches within the county are now going to sync up automatically but what about with the cities? So a city police officer body camera, I think they have different vendors is that correct? How is this gonna be reconciled?
Yeah, we have had discussion with the Municipal Police Department. Some of them are interested in piggybacking on the contract that the county secures a contract but in any event what we're looking for and part of this RFP process will be looking for a system that is agnostic There are digital evidence management systems that actually do work with the various records management systems, the various body-worn camera providers.
And they have experience actually linking into these disparate systems and actually providing a portal to get complete information quicker and more seamlessly to my office so I can quicker and more seamlessly get it to the public defender and other defense counsel. So that is an issue that is actually relevant and will, is addressed in the RFP and would be part of the evaluation process.
I see one overriding system that would could deal with as you said agnostic with the with variety of different.
Yes
contractors or vendors whatever the right terminology is OK
yes exactly are our ideal candidate will be a system that has experience or proves that they are capable of pulling from disparate systems
And while you're standing up here, District Attorney Stabenow, I know there's a lot of different kind of data. But I just wanted to understand and a little bit more because you were standing before us not too long ago with the big new data system related somewhat to racial justice but also just more demographics. How are those completely apples and oranges? Are the systems at all working together? Just if you could explain your plans and how this Dems fits into what we just passed in response to your request.
The dams in general will be the system that all evidence is accurately and efficiently and quickly assimilated, put into folders and communicated The information that we will get when those reports come over to our office, will then be uploaded to our case management system. Our vendor that is doing our data analytics will be pulling from our case management system. So this does impact it in that all the information, the only information we get about say demographics, locational data, racial data is coming from the reports which we will now be getting quicker and more accurately from the agencies.
And then we identify all the data points from the information we receive, and then we'll be able to extract that so our case management system. So there is a link but generally those activities will be occurring from the other systems that we had prior board approval for.
Thanks for answering my questions.
I
wanted to add and only because I think it's extremely important is the magnitude in the positive impact. This is going to have should be articulated from our undersheriff and the genius behind the undersheriff, which is Nimi on the IT side in the sheriff's department because What they do every single day, and again this is why SBC is so important. Is when you see things from your partner's eyes and what they do it really changes you. And this process really changed me as a leader by being involved in it and seeing what the sheriff's office is doing and how much work they do and what the DA has to do. So I wish the undersheriff would come up and maybe brag a little bit about his team.
I second that.
4:51 – 4:568 turns
Good afternoon Chair Williams and board members. So obviously we have A team of records professionals that do their utmost to get information to the district attorney's office as quickly as possible and as accurately as possible. The problem is, is that information can be in so many different little desperate places that things take time and if the sun and the moon don't align properly Things can be missed and it causes downstream problems. And so what we're really hoping for within this DEMS project is increased efficiency That does not require a records clerk to find or ferret out every little piece of information and then put that all together and send that either physically, manually or manually over an electronic system. But it's simply okay this case needs to go to the district attorney and it automatically captures all of that information And sends it across to the district attorney in one fell swoop.
And now, the district attorney is not having to do those multiple callbacks about what about this? I read the report. There's this item that's mentioned but it didn't come across. I need that item again. We're looking for that seamless capacity to capture everything that's needed and make sure that that's sent off when it's needed to be sent off.
Supervisors if I may just Sounds like you're closing the conversation, but I do want to just say thank you to all our staff obviously Judge Ellsworth for bringing this together. It's been a long process and my staff Sarah who's sitting there as our management fellow And she's been running the SPC innovate and so you hear people talking about that That's the program where we go through lean six process can be tedious it's time-consuming And all these folks went through it, and I was very impressed with all your staff. But if you could since we have a few minutes, if you could each introduce who's your staff here today? Because the board knows all of you, the department heads but they don't necessarily know your staff and they've been really the ones instrumental in getting this done.
Absolutely, and on the sheriff's side we have Nimi Holman who is our IT manager. Unfortunately not here today is Susan Campbell who was our records manager who was also very instrumental in trying to find those efficiencies within what we were doing but also looking forward to how we can do things better in the future
From the DA side, I have Chief Financial and Operations Officer Michael Soderman who's actually here a lot. And my IT manager Jose Alvarez who has really been doing spectacular work on this project.
And on behalf of the Public Defender's Office, Deepak Bidwani who has been here like Michael often. And the true genius behind Deepak is Angie Stoke who was honored before this board and is an amazing asset to our county so we're very grateful that she's here today.
So we've talked about Sarah Gill, who is that fellow that I can't compliment her enough. And with her is also Mark Garcia, who is your own IT project manager. These two individuals have been absolutely critical in this project and given the opportunity, I would just like to say thank you. I say thank you all the time for the leaders in the front row but for those behind, they're really the individuals We're there at every one of those meetings that we had.
I won't call anyone out, but at the beginning there were some thoughts on those Innovate SVs that they were exercises in futility, but they still showed up And now we see that it wasn't, that we've all learned so much and we appreciate the pushback honestly because you don't grow unless there's pushback.
Well given all that is at stake both in human lives and costs, you got me at faster. And thank you DA Savarnak for putting it so succinctly for us. My only correction would be that evidence from this room, that manpower is obviously largely women but... All right we're there with ya. Okay do we have a motion? Oh any public comment.
Chair Williams, members of the board I'd just like to note for the record we have no requests to speak on this item.
4:56 – 4:574 turns
I'll make a motion and move
staff recommendation.
I'll second.
All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Thank you. Thank you team! We are adjourned until May 9th in Santa Maria, 9am.