BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 May 9, 2023

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:00 – 0:029 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.920:19

Good morning. I'll call the order of the May 9th, 2023 meeting of Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk, please call the roll.

Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? Here. Supervisor Labanino? Here. Supervisor Hartman? Here in Santa Barbara. Supervisor Caps? Here and Chair Williams? Here
Pledge of Allegiance, led by Bob Nelsonceremonial · click to expand
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.920:42

this time please stand and join the board in pledging allegiance to the flag.

CommentSam LeachProposedself-stated0:49

Ready, begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.920:56

to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

The next item in business is the approval of the minutes from the April 18th 19th and 21st budget workshops and the May 2nd meeting. Is there a motion on the minutes? So moved Second, second Hartman seconds. Real

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:28

call.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:29

Supervisor Nelson, supervisor Labanino, supervisor Hartman,

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:33

I

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:34

supervise their caps, chair Williams motion passes unanimously.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:39

The next item of business is the CEO's report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42

Good morning, Chair Williams and board members. I do have a quick report and that's just to inform the public of our Hope Village groundbreaking. The official groundbreaking of Hope Village will take place just outside these chambers in Santa Maria at noon today. Hope Village is an interim supportive housing community with a goal of getting individuals off the street in the Santa Maria Valley. It will provide beds for transitional age youth, recuperative care, and homeless individuals and couples. The county is in partnership with Dignity Moves, Good Samaritan Shelter Fighting back Santa Maria Valley and Marion Regional Medical Center on the project. So look forward to this afternoon and the groundbreaking for Hope Village.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:21

Thank you, Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?

0:02 – 0:0414 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:26

Chair Williams and members of the board, I do have a few quick announcements this morning. We posted an addendum on Friday May 5th amending today's closed session agenda. The closed session agenda was amended to add a closed session item under conference with labor negotiators subdivision A of government code section 54957.6 employee organizations Santa Barbara County Sheriff Association agency designated representatives CEO Mona Miyasato and HR director Maria Elena de Guevara This amendment was posted online and made available to the Board and the public.

For the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation, and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda, please see page two of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment virtually may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. If you have any questions, please contact the Clerk of the Board's Office at 805-568-2240. That concludes my announcements for today.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.923:27

Would any board members like to pull any items from the administrative agenda? I'd

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction3:33

like to pull A4 for roll call vote. That's right,

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.923:36

and I do have A18 pulled from the public but that's a resolution so we'll take that up in any case. Can I get a motion for the balance of the A agenda?

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction3:50

I'll make a motion for approval of administrative agenda with exception of A4.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.923:54

There is a motion and a second. Roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion and a second. Roll call · 2 under review
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? Aye. Supervisor Lavinino? Supervisor Hartman? Aye. Supervisor Katz? Aye And Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:06

Motion passes unanimously.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.924:08

Then let's take up A4.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:13

Chair Williams and members of the board, administrative item number four is from the Human Resources Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding an amendment to the ordinance setting compensation and benefits for members of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.924:29

There's a motion by a second.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:34

I'll second,

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.924:35

seconded by Caps. Roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion by a second. I'll second, seconded by Caps. Roll call
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? No. Supervisor Lavinina? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye. Supervisor Caps? Aye Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role4:47

Motion passes four to one

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.924:50

Now is the time for general public comment Oh, I'm sorry. No, there are resolutions we'll take up administrative item number 18.

0:05 – 0:109 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role5:03

Chair Williams and members of the board, Administrative Item 18 is sponsored by Supervisor Nelson and Supervisor Labanino. It's to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring K-9 Domas upon his retirement from the Agriculture Weights & Measures Department after over seven years of faithful and distinguished service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have K- 9 Domas and Christine Tyler.

If you'll please make your way to the podium I will read the resolution into the record. Whereas Agriculture Detector K-9 Domus with Agriculture Weights and Measures Department will retire after seven and a half years of dedicated service to the County of Santa Barbara, effective May 3rd, 2023. And whereas K- 9 Domus was partnered with Christine Tyler, Santa Barbara County's agriculture biologist on August 11th 2015 and graduated from canine training at the National Detector Dog Training Center in Newman Georgia in September 2015.

And whereas Canine Domus has alerted on over 50,000 agriculture packages of which 6,000 were found unmarked with an accuracy rate of over 94%. Canine Domus has intercepted 550 pests of concern over his career capable of causing serious harm to agriculture and or natural environment. And whereas Canine Domus has participated in numerous outreach presentations including the Santa Barbara County Fair The Santa Barbara County Humane Society, Santa Barbara Animal Services, Allan Hancock Community College. And whereas K-9 Domas' only reward for his hard work is an endless supply of dog treats, tennis balls, squeaky toys and belly rubs.

Now therefore be it hereby ordered to resolve that this Board of Supervisors do hereby extend to K- 9 Domas agricultural detector dog our sincere and grateful appreciation to his dedication and service to the county of Santa Barbara into the state of California passed and adopted today.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.927:01

That's good, he made a speech.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:04

Chair, if I may, Jose Chang with the Santa Barbara County Agricultural Commission's office. Members of the board, CEO Miyasato, county council, county staff members of the public we are very grateful that you are honoring today the work Dumis and Chris Taylor have done over the years not only to protect Santa Barbara agriculture but also the natural environment prone unwanted pests and diseases, but that of the state as well.

Although we are saying goodbye to Dumas today, the program will continue in Santa Barbara County. Dumas has been very grateful just you know a pat on the back, a scratch on the head and lots of treat toys I'm told that he's going to spend his days in retirement enjoying an endless supply of dog treats, tennis balls, squeaky toys and belly rubs. And Chair if you would allow us one minute? He would like to demo one last time how he performed his work over the years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:42

Thank you.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.929:13

I thought there was gonna be an ACP infected branch or something in there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed9:22

Thank you, Chair.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.929:32

Thank you so much Dumas. Let's go to item number 19. Oh, public comment. We do have public comment on item 18.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role9:42

Chair Williams and members of the board we have Kevin Morrow which would like to make a public comment for this item.

PresenterKevin MerrillSanta Barbara County Farm Bureau as well as the State Farm Bureau and want to reProposedself-stated9:50

Good morning Mr. Chair I'm Kevin Merrill today representing the Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau as well as the State Farm Bureau and want to reiterate our support for the Ag Commissioners and staff and of course Dumas and the new Dumas is coming I don't know her name Vetri I think Bertie, Bertie's on her way. Anyway it's really important with the worldwide economy we get all these pests coming in here and without their help we could lose agriculture here not only in Santa Barbara County but the state so we thank you for your support for funding it and again like to look forward to working with the Ag Commissioner his staff they do a great job at keeping agriculture number one here in the county so thank you all very much thank you guys

0:10 – 0:154 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9210:37

We'll go to item number 19.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role10:41

Chair Williams and members of the Board, Administrative Item 19 is sponsored by Supervisor Katz. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Patricia Martinez upon her retirement from the Probation Department after over 21 years of faithful and distinguished service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Martina, excuse me, Patricia Martinez.

If you will join us at the podium I will now read the resolution into the record. Whereas Patricia Martinez moved to Santa Barbara County in 1980, she graduated from Margetti High School and later graduated from Allan Hancock College with an associate's degree in human services. She was subsequently hired by the county of Santa Barbara Probation Department as Extra Help Juvenile Instructions Officer JIO. In 2000, and was assigned to the probation counseling and education center. And whereas Patricia was hired as a full-time deputy probation officer DPO in 2001 assigned to adult intensive supervision unit. And in 2007 she was promoted to senior DPO overseeing a juvenile placement caseload. She traveled throughout the state of California assuring youth receive the care and support they deserved.

In her tenure as a senior DPO, she had worked closely with numerous adult and juvenile clients. She oversaw these clients in their home environment and in the office to assist them with reaching their goals. She represented the probation department in Santa Barbara Superior Court and worked with numerous collaborative agencies. And whereas Patricia assisted in keeping the community and their residents safe during the fire in 2009. In 2013, 2015 to receive officer of the year award and juvenile court services as DPO and as respectively.

While assigned the Juvenile Justice Center, she had a unique opportunity to escort a youth to the hospital for the delivery of her baby. She received a letter of accommodation for going above and beyond in providing emotional and physical support to the youth. And whereas Patricia is looking forward to spending time with her husband, her children, and traveling while making new unforgettable memories with her family.

Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Patricia Martinez for over 21 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County and the Probation Department, and extends to her best wishes for a fulfilling enjoyable and rewarding retirement passed and adopted today.

CommentSam LeachProposedself-stated13:17

Thank you Supervisor Capps and members of the board. I'm Sam Leach, I'm the Deputy Chief Probation Officer over the Facilities Division and we really appreciate your time in acknowledging Patricia and her efforts. It's really hard to compete with belly rubs and squeaky toys But I will tell you that this is a really hard profession that we're in, and that Patricia has put in over 20 years doing something that not everybody can do.

And being acknowledged twice as Officer of the Year speaks to everything you need to know about her. So we appreciate your humility and grit and perseverance And just the amount that you cared about all of the clients in our community that you've served for all these years. Thank you so much and I invite you to please stay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed14:06

Like you said, over 20 years I did not know what I was getting into when I stepped into this position. I stepped in to help the youth. I was really drawn to helping their life circumstances that led me to over 21 different positions with the probation department between the field services Investigations, court services. Now I just retired from the Santa Maria PRC post release resource center where we're receiving our clients from prison and trying to get them into counseling and so that going back in there and that was Probably one of my most fulfilling positions, along with where I started with the probation school back in 2000. That was a great position too. So probation is changing the way we've done our job in the past and it's very therapeutic and I'm happy to see where it's going.

I am looking forward to my retirement. It is time for the new ones to come and take my place but it has been rewarding, very rewarding Thank you for your service.

0:15 – 0:203 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role15:38

Phil Williams and members of the board, administrative item 20 is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Paul Zellis upon his retirement from the district attorney's office after over 30 years of faithful and distinguished service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have District Attorney John Sabernock, Chief Investigator Tina Perkins, and Paul Zellis.

If you will make your way to the podium, I'll read the resolution into the record. Whereas Paul Salas retired from county service on March 31st, 2023 having faithfully served the citizens of Santa Barbara County for 30 years and whereas Paul began his career in 1993 with the Santa Barbara County Marshal's Office and became a Sheriff's Deputy in 1996 when the Marshal's Office consolidated with the Sheriff's Office. Paul remained with the Sheriff's Office until he was hired by the District Attorney's office in 2016 as an investigator And whereas Paul has worked in the courts and civil units as a deputy marshal. As a sheriff's deputy, he was assigned to patrol and later promoted to detective where he spent 15 years investigating thousands of crimes against people and property crimes including homicide Attempted homicide, robbery, kidnapping, child molestation, assault, domestic violence, burglary, narcotic and drug violations.

As a district attorney investigator Paul was assigned to the general felony and misdemeanor caseloads in Santa Maria working with various deputy district attorneys to assist with everything from homicide cases to misdemeanor DUIs And whereas, throughout his career Paul provided the employees of the District Attorney's Office with positive leadership and served as a positive representative of the District Attorney's Office and the law enforcement profession as a whole.

Paul was a recipient of the H Thomas Gary Award in 2000 for conflict resolution as well as the Santa Maria Elks Award for outstanding service in 1994 and in 2021. Paul was also awarded Investigator of the Year by the District Attorney's Office in 2017 and 2022. And whereas, Paul served the citizens of Santa Barbara County with extraordinary professionalism and sensitive law enforcement service while dedicating his life to the pursuit of justice. And Paul's knowledge, skills, and experience contributed greatly to the overall professionalism and the goals of the Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office and the county. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors commends District Attorney Investigator Paul Zelas for his faithful and distinguished service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County, and congratulates him upon his retirement.

And wishes him and his family many years of good health and happiness passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed18:31

Chair Williams, members of the board. I just want to say a few words. Everything that was read speaks to the quality of investigators that we have and the small police force that is associated with the district attorney's office. The skill, the knowledge, the dedication to public service is absolutely unmatched. But even more than that, what Paul brings to his job, his career, his devotion to being a police officer is a humanity. You saw the humanity when he dealt with victims. You saw his humanity when he dealt with suspects.

And you really saw his humanity with the way that he treated everybody in the office. Paul does everything to remove the stereotypes of police officers That think that they are uncaring or have an agenda other than public safety. Paul cares deeply about the community, he cares deeply about his career and the people around him so from that perspective and from every perspective it'll be sad to see him go but he has earned the right to live his life on his terms at this point even without belly rubs Thank you, Paul.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed20:13

Thank you. Good morning, I feel a tremendous pride in being able to help countless citizens of this community and helping keep Santa Barbara County safe. I am grateful for the career that I've been able to have and thankful for your recognition.

0:20 – 0:264 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9220:51

Go to item 21.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role20:54

Chair Williams and members of the board, Administrative Item 21 is sponsored by Supervisor Labanino. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Dolly Motley upon her retirement from the Department of Child Services after over 33 years of faithful and distinguished service to the citizens of Santa Barbara County. Receiving this recognition here in person as Dolly Motley and a few members of her fan club. So if you'll make your way to the podium I will now read the resolution into the record.

Whereas Dolly Motley's passion and pride in serving the community has been evident in her 33 years of service with the county, as she progressed from clerk typist two to a child support officer two with the Department of Child Support Services. And whereas Dolly's meticulous work in locating parents establishing enforcing and collecting child support orders, completing complex financial case audits and modifying child support orders provided invaluable and immeasurable benefit To the child support program and children and families in Santa Barbara County. And whereas Dolly utilized her extensive expertise and knowledge of child support program when she assisted with special projects for the department, including creating forms in a new computer system and working on cases for juvenile placement with the probation department.

And whereas Molly's process improvement and organization skills, as well as her attention to detail will be greatly missed by her co-workers. Whereas Dolly concluded her 33 years of public service with the Santa Barbara County upon her recent retirement and looks forward to spending time with her family including her daughters Christy and Shayla as well as traveling the world renovating her home and attending countless Garthbrook concerts.

Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors commends Dolly Motley for her commitment in distinguished public service to the families in our county, congratulates her upon her retirement and wishes her many years of continued good health happiness and time with her beloved family passed and adopted today.

PresenterMeadow RichardsonDepartment of Child Support ServicesProposedself-stated23:04

Chair Williams and members of the board, I am Meadow Richardson, Assistant Director of the Department of Child Support Services. And I'm proud to be here today with Jennifer Diaz, child support supervisor, to recognize Dolly Motley upon her retirement from the county and from the department. When I began with the Department of Child Support Services, I quickly learned that the role of a child support officer encompasses so much more than the name implies.

A child support officer is a researcher, a process improver, a listener, a kind ear, an organizational expert and negotiator. A mediator, an investigator, a collaborator, a skip tracer, a court witness, a financial and legal analyst, an interpreter, a prolific note taker, a diplomat in independent thinker. I could go on and on. I would like to thank Dolly for performing all of these roles in an exemplary manner. In a recent customer service survey, Dolly received five star ratings in every category on behalf of the Department of Child Support Services. I would like to thank Dolly for her 33 years of service to the department and wish her best wishes upon her retirement. Jennifer Diaz child support supervisor would like to say a few words as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:35

Thank you Metta and Chair Williams and members of the board. I cannot be prouder today to be here to honor Dolly Motley. When I started with the department 18 years ago, I immediately noticed Dolly as she stood out from other child support officers. I looked at her many times for guidance as she was meticulous in the tasks that she completed. She takes much pride in the work she did and it showed that she was dedicated to the families of Santa Barbara County.

As a young caseworker, I learned the art of negotiations from her with our participants. At the time she was managing the juvenile placement reimbursement caseload and dealing with family members already in a difficult situation. Believe it or not, not everybody wants to cooperate with our department. And so she was always able to negotiate with them and get them in a place that where they can pay back the support that is owed and I learned so much from her during that time.

While she works on various projects, she always had an eagle eye and attention to detail to notice things that other people may have missed. She always wanted to make sure the best processes were in place and she was a subject matter expert for the department and it inspired me to be more like her. She always pushed me to do better as a supervisor. She also reminded me that our caseloads were all unique at just the individual, but to look at the individual, just not the big picture. She's always reminding people that just like apples and oranges are fruits so is our caseloads, that they're all unique and we can't look at them as the same.

Sitting so close to Dolly I became not only a coworker but a friend. I will miss taking our breaks walking through the mall hitting our many pokey stops and watching our friendship grow. I'm overjoyed that Dolly can now start a new chapter in her life and spend valuable time with her family. Congratulations, Dolly on your retirement.

0:26 – 0:323 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed26:42

And now you want me to talk? I just want to thank everybody. It's been my honor to help get money to the children where it's needed and work for the county. Thank you. And I will have belly rubs because I have a 25 pound cat. Item 22.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role27:15

Chair Williams and members of the Board, Administrative Item 22 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 7th 2023 through May 13th 2023 as National Correctional Officers Week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here we have Chief Vincent Wasilewski and custody personnel. If you'll please make your way to the podium I will now read the resolution into the record Whereas the week of May 7th through May 13th represents a period where correctional officers across the United States are recognized for their dedication and heroism to their local communities.

Whereas, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office custody branch consisting of South County Main Jail operations Northern Branch Jail Operations, Research Bureaus, Health Services Bureau, Transportation Bureau, Inmate Program Bureau and Special Operations Resource Team are highly regarded professionals working in conjunction with other local criminal justice and public safety entities. And whereas, 50 years ago the Sheriff's Office and this board recognized the need to create a sheriff's correction officer rank structure that would best serve the duties of the correction officer specifically trained in unique needs of detention facilities responsible for housing security and transportation of all inmates incarcerated in Santa Barbara County who are awaiting trial.

serving their sentence in their county jails or awaiting their transfer to state prison. And whereas this year marks the fourth National Correctional Officers Week during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, correction officers reporting for duty and a 24 7 facility facing the demands of an ever increasing overcrowded jail system and the additional needs brought on by a nationwide public health safety All while maintaining order, security and preserving the care, custody and dignity of those individuals charged with their care.

And whereas the citizens of Santa Barbara County can rest assured that these men and women are dedicated to their service and perform their duties professionally and ethically while displaying integrity courage and fairness thus ensuring the safety of the community, their fellow officers and incarcerated individuals Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes the week of May 7th through the 13th, 2023 as National Correctional Officers Week. And takes this opportunity to thank the men and women of the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office who have chosen the field of corrections as their service to our community past and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed29:53

Chair Williams and esteemed board members, on behalf of Sheriff Brown and our entire sheriff's office team we genuinely thank you for this resolution. Bringing attention to and recognizing the contributions of our corrections professionals in keeping our local communities safe and secure and helping to make Santa Barbara County a great place to live and work In 1984, President Ronald Reagan established the first week of May as National Corrections Officer Week.

An opportunity for all of us to recognize those who serve as corrections officers or in our case custody deputies men and women who day in and day out exemplify professionalism integrity and strength And who do so within a difficult and sometimes dangerous work environment. It goes without saying, but our custody deputies walk the toughest beat in our county each and every day.

They do so generally behind the scenes unseen by community members and oftentimes underappreciated. For the vital role they serve in keeping our community safe by maintaining the security of our jails. All the while ensuring that persons in our custody are provided with humane constitutional care, that they are afforded opportunities for self-improvement and are connected with services and support that can assist them in breaking the cycle of incarceration.

Sheriff Brown and I are incredibly proud of our custody team, individually and collectively. Our custody deputies are truly an integral component of our community's overall public safety team, and we thank your board for recognizing their contributions through this resolution. Unfortunately, we have a very small representation here with us because those jails just can't shut down to bring everybody here. We would if we could.

But again, we really thank you for taking this opportunity and will make sure that we distribute this and make sure that each one of our custodial deputies recognize or see the recognition that they're being provided. So thank you very much.

0:32 – 0:341 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9232:26

Just because I know it's been a tough couple years for a lot of deputies, I wanted to say that it is an honor when it is my turn to carry this resolution. And it's very personal honor when I was in my sophomore year and in high school My dad left town and I moved in with a father of a friend who was a custody deputy for the county, and I had previous to that some very You know, negative stereotypes about law enforcement officers as a young man.

And it changed a lot of my life and trajectory. You know, he had the night shift a lot. There's a lot of tough calls as a custody deputy in Santa Barbara and everywhere. So not everything was happy all the time because it's tough work. But he created a real stable home environment that I had never seen before, which I think is it is not coincidence. It's not a coincidental in his choice of career.

There was always food in the refrigerator, which I had never encountered before in my life, which as a teenager is kind of deal And I think what is most powerful is after retirement, he came back to be a voluntary minister to some of your clients. So it says something when even when it's a tough environment When you get to go away and you're no longer paid, but then you come back and do it for free. So I just for Mike Stevenson and for all of you, I just really respect the job that that you do.

Item number 23.

0:34 – 0:385 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role34:28

Chair Williams and members of the Board, Administrative Item 23 is sponsored by Supervisor Labanino. It's to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 7th 2023 through May 13th 2023 as Compost Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here we have Bob Engel. If you will now join us at the podium I will read the resolution into the record Whereas compost improves soil structure, reduces runoff and enables amended soils to use less water. And whereas using sustainable soil enriching compost helps prevent erosion of topsoil without depleting valuable wildlife habitats. And whereas returning compost organic resources to the soil is a method of decreasing dependence on chemical fertilizer and nonpoint pollution And whereas community sustainability is enhanced by composting green waste, biosolids and other organic materials.

Whereas organic materials suitable for composting represent up to 70% of materials that could be landfilled each year. And whereas the County of Santa Barbara has initiated Green Waste Collection Programs with their franchise haulers to aid in efforts of environmental sustainability. The Angles and Grays Regional Composting Facility in Santa Maria has been successfully composting organic material for sustainable agricultural practices since 1993. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims the week of May 7th through May 13, 2023 as Compost Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed36:07

Chair Williams and fellow supervisors, thank you very much for recognizing International Compost Awareness Week. Brought along Dustin Bumgarten our Chief Operations Manager and we're celebrating on behalf of the USCC United States Composting Council this is it's truly international and has picked up speed I think i've been doing this on and off for 20 years in front of you we're celebrating our 30th year of composting here we started 93 So I feel I should retire.

We are having a great event on Saturday, we're on Better Avia Road 745 West Better Avia Road. We're having an open house. We have potting soil station for children and parents alike to build their own potting soil with compost and soils. And we have vegetable transplants to put in the pots And we have vegetable transplants they can take home with them and do their own home garden. So a variety of them, courtesy of Plantel.

We're going to have heavy equipment out there. We're going to have photo ops that you can take pictures with your head in a piece of broccoli. You can do all kinds of things so anyway thank you for recognizing International Compost Awareness Week. We need to make people aware That compost is a product. You need to buy compost, you need to improve your soil, make the Central Coast healthy.

Dustin said how are you going to work the belly rub into your speech? Well my party message is the toys. If you can keep the toys out of your green waste cart we'd really appreciate it because we get a lot of Fido's balls I don't think we get Dolmans Mr. Chair.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.8438:22

Well, it would be remiss of me if I also didn't think Bob. Bob is a long time has served for many years on the Santa Maria Cemetery District as well. We want to thank you for your service and talking about putting two things together. I'm not sure cemetery district and composting probably should be handled by the same person, but you know we'll deal with that

CommentMarcella OrtizProposed38:41

later.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9238:49

Thank you Bob. Now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the agenda. Madam Clerk, is there any requests to speak on general public comment?

0:38 – 0:445 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role38:59

Chair Williams and members of the board we have three requests to speak. We will begin in Santa Barbara with Marcella Ortiz.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9239:14

Ms. Ortiz

CommentMarcella OrtizProposed39:17

Good morning. I just want to congratulate everybody sitting through here and seeing all the accolades that go out to everybody, it's really nice. I wish my job did the same thing but it really is important to have those employees that are dedicated to their profession. So I'm here on the housing issue. Everything I'm going to say is probably the same things that we've taught you've heard over and over again I'm a full-time employee.

I am a full time student and I am a mother, very busy. And one of my papers that I am doing this semester for school is on affordable housing and I am just distraught To the way that not just here. This is a nation, national worldwide problem and how what are we going to do to go forward? I appreciate that you guys voted to do this day in Isla Vista but we need to know that there's gonna be more work towards that so that when it does come time when this gentleman is able to get all the paperwork in order and he has the right That's not enough homes for these people to go to.

Is there going to move forward? Are we going to be able to see that these people will have to be given the right to go back into these apartments? Are we gonna be able to see that they're gonna get, you know, a guarantee for a lease. The things that we ask that go along with you being able to put a stay on their eviction And I just want to touch a little bit. I don't live in Santa Barbara, I was here in support of those people. I live in Solving and we were bought out by a very big real estate company a year ago and we're not, I will preference, we are not having the threat of eviction put over us.

But the treatment that we're getting from the, not the owner himself because we have no access to him. But the treatment that we're getting from the company that runs his properties is important and I've lived in my apartment for 20 years, and I am just now meeting all my neighbors. We are organizing so that we can be aware of the laws. We don't understand how come it's so difficult to be able to figure out what is correct and what's not correct.

The building that I live in is 40 years old. The gentleman says that we no longer are under the Tenant Protection Act and that he can do anything he wants to the rent. Solving is a very beautiful boutique city now, it's growing into something really nice from the dead little place it was. But the short term rentals have taken so many apartments away from and living places away from the workers that we have issues there. We have these people coming in buying up their properties, raising the rents.

And just going forward, I know that all of you are working on this. I know you're aware of all the situations and just want to know that there's things in the background being done. It's not gonna help me, it's probably not gonna help the people in Isla Vista, it's probably not gonna help people five years down because it takes a long time to get things done.

But we have to start moving forward and finding a way to do something with housing so that the people that are the workers have somewhere to live in their communities. And just one more example is I have, my daughter works at a store in Solving. She's the only one that lives in Solving, everyone else commutes from Lompoc. Their car breaks down, they can't get to work. They're not being able to find jobs for some reason in Lompoc, they come to Solving because there's those little entry jobs there.

So anyways, just another reminder that we need help and I know that you guys are working on it and it's not an easy solution and I just thank you for listening to us. And I just want to show you this is...I went from a one-page lease This is my lease for a two bedroom apartment in a 40 year old apartment complex. It's hard to read.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9244:28

Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role44:31

We will now go to Sam Sipesi in Santa Barbara.

0:44 – 0:474 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed44:40

Hi again, I am also here again to talk about the housing issue. So once again we as a county need more ways to keep people in their homes if a landlord decides there's a reason to renovate Especially when it's only deemed necessary after things like a $92 million sale for core spaces, our new owners. By remodel they mean roof repairs and window replacements for four separate buildings at least according to their COO Chris Richards. They could easily accommodate residents.

If landlords want to renovate their buildings, they should give us temporary housing and a right to be invited back into our homes at the same rent with a one-year lease. There's a reason California voters fought so hard for rent caps. Additionally we need a renovation moratorium until the vacancy levels rise in the county as previously stated. As for anyone else that received one of the many CBC in the Sweeps core spaces harassment letters from Lacey Taylor, you should report her to the bar also.

You don't just get to lie to poor people to suit your narrative, Lacey. Thank you for hearing our voices though and acting to support Santa Barbara County Renter Supervisors and we're really happy that you're willing to work with us. Thank you.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role45:54

We will now move to Zoom with Leigh Hiller

CommentLeigh HillerProposed46:01

Good morning, Tara Williams and members of the board. I want to begin by wishing Supervisor Capps a happy birthday. Okay, yep. Take a moment to celebrate that and of course to celebrate Compost Week as a composter and I wanted to say something about another housing issue. I don't usually come to you in general public comment but I'm hoping to draw some attention to this for the community more generally just as humans are struggling terrifically with an absence of housing so our animals and in particular dogs the pandemic and its aftermath have created this really complex situation nationwide where our shelters are filling up with animals that were acquired early in the pandemic whose owners can no longer keep them. This has been exacerbated by housing challenges and cost of living increases, and so Animal Services is doing everything in its power under our creative and energetic new director to get dogs back out into homes as quickly as possible.

There have been pop-up open houses and fee waivers, and all kinds of creative efforts to get animals into foster care which takes the load off. What we don't want to do is go back to being a county that kills for lack of space. We don't want to have to euthanize healthy, otherwise adoptable animals because their kennels are too full. So I invite the community to get involved, to foster, to come to the shelter and even take a dog out for a day. It gives the dog a break. It makes them more adoptable. It draws attention to them in the community and it helps kennel staff.

And anything you can do if you can't foster, get involved in social media outreach to make the community aware. We can work together as a community to reduce the likelihood of unnecessary euthanasias but it's going to take an all hands on deck approach. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role47:55

William members of the board that was our final request to speak

0:48 – 0:5914 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9248:01

and we will go to departmental item number one public health

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role48:06

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the Public Health Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an extra help service retirement waiver for public for the Public Health Department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:20

Thank you Mr. Chair, good morning Supervisors. Public Health Microbiologist is a very unique and also very rare specialty and we currently have two vacancies that we are struggling to fill. We are pushing aggressively but also we're competing with the state and other counties and these have to be certified as well in the State of California so with Mr. Crisostomo's retirement in March, we are down to one public health microbiologist who is now doing both the administrative operational as well as the lab work as a supervisor. So we would appreciate if we can bring back Mr. Christos Domo as extra help until we find a better solution either by filling those two positions or looking at alternative ways of keeping our lab operation.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9249:15

Thank you any board questions? Any public comment? And we'll go to deliberation. Can I get a motion? I move stack for recommendation.

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9049:28

I will second.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9249:29

There's a motion and a second. Roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion and a second. Roll call,
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? No. Supervisor Labanino? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye Supervisor Kapps? Aye Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:42

Motion passes four to one.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9249:44

Thank you. Departmental item number two

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role49:51

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number two is from the County Executive Office and Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Central Coast Community Energy member agency annual update.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9250:08

Good morning Supervisors. Ms Watkins let's make sure your mic's on great thank you.

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction50:14

Good morning Chair Williams, members of the board. The County of Santa Barbara joined Central Coast Community Energy in 2019 as a strategy to help meet our greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. Subsequently they've been providing electricity to the majority of our region and we've been able to benefit from the variety of programs that they offer to help move us towards electrification. Today Judy Young, who is a senior account executive with Central Coast Community Energy is going to provide an annual update. Hello

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated50:52

thank you and happy birthday Supervisor Capps. No belly rubs from me today sorry my name is Judy Young and I am as Ashley said Senior Customer Accounts Manager with a focus on our member agencies It is my honor to be here today to highlight Central Coast Community Energy's recent accomplishments, as well as our plans for 2023 and beyond. I will start with a brief introduction to community choice aggregation for anyone who is new to how the CCA model works and how it differs from the investor owned utility model.

And then I will highlight Central Coast Community Energy's history and role in your community. Once a community signs on to the CCA, pardon me I'll go back. Once a community signs onto a CCA, the CCA takes over electricity procurement while the existing investor owned utility continues to provide transmission distribution metering and billing. CCAs are public agencies and return revenue to their communities in the form of programs incentives, rebates and can also assist with local job creation and renewable energy development.

Our agency has seen tremendous expansion since we formed in 2017. We expanded from Monterey Bay to the entire Central Coast. And my notes say your community joined in 2021 but Ashley said 2019

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction52:22

and I'll defer to her. We joined in 2019. I think you started service in 2020.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated52:28

Got it. Enrollment was in 2021, thank you. Today 3CE is made up of 34 member agencies throughout the five counties serving nearly 450,000 customers and securing over $1 billion in renewable energy store and storage agreements while returning $26 million in customer programs. Over 94% of utility customers in our communities are enrolled with 3CE And in the year 2022 alone, we delivered over 5000 gigawatt hours of electricity throughout our region.

Also in the last year and a half, we enrolled the community of Buellton completed enrollment of unincorporated regions of Santa Barbara County and welcomed to the city of Atascadero as our newest community. There's a lot of news to report, and I'd like to focus it on the four major benefits we promised to our communities when we formed in 2017. So let's start with local control.

Community choice aggregation allows local government to have greater control over the type and cost of energy supplied to their communities to ensure energy sources and rates reflect the community's values and goals. With 3CE, Decisions about where your power comes from and how you are charged for it are made by local elected officials. We're making progress on climate goals together as a region, and we are far ahead of both state and federal targets to decarbonize our energy supply here in the county of Santa Barbara. You are represented by Supervisor Das Williams and County Executive Officer Mona Miyasato on our boards.

So next I'll talk about rates In March of 2022, we decoupled our rates from PG&Es for our PG&E customers and established our own rate setting procedures based on cost of service resulting in about 18% savings for residential customers. Small and medium commercial customers saved between 2 and 19%. During the year 2022 alone, once we switch to cost of service and we expect our competitiveness with the incumbent utility to continue.

For our SCE customers you saved over 2% over IOU rates across the board in the year 2022. And 3CE also provides 7% more renewable energy than the incumbent Resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. As you can see, we have worked to keep our service affordable for our communities and now I will shift focus to our efforts to procure clean power. Today we are at 50% clean and renewable and on track to be at 60% by the year 2025 which is five years earlier than the goal set by the state of California.

Our strategy commits 3CE to meet 100 percent of its demand with clean and renewable resources by the year 2030, with balancing on a monthly basis, which is a full 15 years ahead of the goals set by the state of California. 3CE is also pursuing offshore wind generation And emerging technology in California and the auction for leases in federal waters off the Central Coast. In December of 2022 was an important step in bringing these resources online.

In order to achieve these goals, three C's procurement team has prioritized long-term contracts that bring new clean resources online as quickly as possible. To date, 3C has executed 19 Long-term power purchase agreements and energy storage agreements. Five of these projects came online in 2022 and added to nearly 285 megawatt of generation and energy storage combined or about 22 percent of our annual load.

Meeting greenhouse gas emission reduction goals is also about electrification as individuals the biggest impact that we can make To cut greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality is to replace fossil fuel vehicles and gas appliances in our homes. As 3CE works to clean the grid, electric cars and appliances will be emissions free in their operation and the electricity that powers them will be 100% clean and renewable.

The final 3CE commitment I am reporting on tonight today, pardon me, is a continued investment in your community and all of the communities in our service area. On the screen is what we accomplished over the last year, and looking more broadly over the past three years 3CE has helped put more than 1,000 new and used electric vehicles on Central Coast roads by distributing more than $2 million dollars in cash rebates paid directly to our customers.

By electrifying our transportation sector, these EVs have spared more than 6,000 metric tons of regional CO2 emissions. And in addition, in collaboration with funding partners like the California Energy Commission, RCE has delivered rebates that will help build more than 1,000 new electric vehicle charging stations for our region. We've also paid to make more than 2,000 new affordable housing units all-electric and that support continues.

Residential customers are eligible for rebates up to $8,700 towards EVs and chargers. And we offer additional incentive toward replacing certain gas powered appliances. We also have programs aimed at helping our member agency partners advance electrification and stay up-to-date with building codes that advance electrification. And we have business friendly programs designed to electrify new housing including farm worker housing, to upgrade ag equipment And to install DCFC Level 3 chargers.

With an eye to equity coupled with an awareness that many of these enhancements are out of reach for our underserved communities, we provide an additional $1000 electrify your ride and electrify your home rebates for income qualified customers. In partnership with the state, 3CE has garnered over 4.8 million dollars for your community. Please see the rebates and incentives page on our website for more information and to apply.

With the continued support of the County of Santa Barbara staff, supervisors and community along with the rest of our communities, 3CE will continue to deliver innovation innovative solutions impactful programs and exemplary service along with clean and renewable energy. This concludes my presentation and thank you for your time.

0:59 – 1:1443 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9259:41

Questions from the Board? Supervisor Kemps.

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.9059:47

Thank you so much, I'm such a fan and have been for a long time since I was a volunteer with CEC, Community Environmental Council. I just was hoping you could start off with a super basic question that I get asked sometimes and you did a good job explaining a complicated program with a complicated name. How do people, are people automatically opted in sign up? Can you just walk through that process because again it's sort of it's a question that I've gotten from some friends who are curious about this.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:00:14

Sure absolutely so when an agency such as the County of Santa Barbara Unincorporated Thank you, customers within the county. So when you all voted to join 3CE there's a time period that passes and what you need to do here I think the resolution needs to be read twice and public comment and all of that so once we begin enrollment everybody, all of the incumbent utility customers at that time are automatically enrolled in the CCA In this case, 3CE.

Anybody can opt out at any time. There is a little bit of a complicated thing about a time period when you if somebody opts out and like I think it's the first six months then they can come back in within a time period if they opt out and it's say one year or longer since enrollment began than when they come back It would be at a different rate class. I'm not sure exactly if it's important, but I can get you those details.

But basically anybody can opt out at any time once an agency votes to join and enrollment begins. Everybody is automatically opted in and again that the CCA provides energy procurement and the incumbent utility SCE or PG&E continues to provide transmission, which is the power lines we see everywhere metering and billing so customers still get a bill from PG&E.

We have our charges or procurement on there and then they have their charges for delivery.

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:02:07

Thank you. So I saw in your presentation 11 million Californians, 400,000 in 3CE. Do you have a rough estimate of how many customers in Santa Barbara County that would be? I don't but I certainly can get you

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:02:19

that information.

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:02:20

Okay great and it's also my last question related to the investment back into the community Noted electrification of school buses, which is an interest of mine. If possible, if you could follow up with me and my team about where in Santa Barbara County, who's taking advantage of that so I maybe perhaps can connect some other districts?

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:02:40

Oh absolutely. Just about the school buses or about programs in general?

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:02:46

Specifically about electrification of school buses. Terrific yes. Great thank you for your presentation. Thank you.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:02:56

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you for the presentation. I do want to also thank CEO Miyasato and Supervisor Williams. This is a heavy lift. You know those meetings I know are long and so we appreciate you guys being the ones out front on this. Two questions I had is so those projects that it says projects online in 2022 and they on that slide at the geothermal, the solar and storage Are those California projects or are they spread out throughout the country?

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:03:32

No, West Coast entirely. As far as I know they're all in California. Well let's see if we actually go to this slide here.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:03:41

Okay you can see the California ones there. We have a couple in

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:03:45

Nevada

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:03:47

and one in Arizona as well but most of the projects are in California

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:03:53

And if you, you can also see the last line for each project will tell you whether it's online

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:03:58

or

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:03:59

under development.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:04:00

Awesome. Okay, good. So question then is so what I'm worried about is as other states start to adopt lower GHG thresholds and those types of things there are going to be we're all gonna be chasing this same green energy which I would guess would probably drive the price up Now that I'm comfortable that our energy sources are in the state of California, is there any has there been any talk from legislators or anything about okay, California energy for Californians as far as I don't want to see our energy getting chipped out to you know Colorado or somewhere else that might not be making these investments?

Or is it just kind of a wide open wild wild west?

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:04:49

So I don't think I'm the best person to answer that question. However, California is as you know kind of leading the charge and we certainly have enough demand in the state to keep our power here. I would imagine there's also California energy grid and The regulators, again I'm not the right person to speak to this but there's regulations about how the grid is managed.

And I do know that there are somewhere between 50 and 100 issues at the state right now bills being considered concerning how our power is handled so there's a lot of policy being written right

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:05:41

now And I could just add, I'm not aware of any bill currently that would restrict a developer from developing outside of the state or anything like that. Is that?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:05:54

Yeah. Oh, just because I was one of the authors of the bill that preserved the bucket system, I can just speak to the fact that the framework for renewable development in California essentially Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think that the question out there is, that's debated in the legislature and elsewhere is how much more interplay of resources from the east would flow into California.

With the pluses and minuses of generally there's less you know like if you look at that map All except for maybe the geothermal project has project labor agreements on it. So there's substantial benefits to employees, it's good labor practices. The drawback of tapping into stuff out-of-state is there's not as solid of labor practices. You have different hours of sunlight and the more sources of places where wind is going at a certain time creates more of an ability to load balance. And really, the future isn't just about making more projects. It's really about how do you shift your load? Almost all the cost and almost all the pollution comes from stuff that's four to nine p.m., right? And so how do you get use off of that and how do you get more renewables that will be online at that time?

I

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:07:52

guess what I'm worried about is let's say Texas all of a sudden adopts, and I don't know what their climate action plan is. But eventually everybody's going to get there right? So you take a huge population with that might not have already this investment and they come in and say hey I want to start buying your energy. What's our protection You know, anyway. I guess that's something for down the road to worry about.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:15

And Supervisor Lavinia through the Chair, I think that's why 3CE and all these CCAs are powerful because they enter long-term contracts. Okay. And so developers will develop through RFPs etc., and the CCAs have sometimes joined together and sometimes individual purchasing with long-term power contracts, and that's why a lot of it is in development because there've been contracts to do it but they're not in development yet. So that's the strategy.

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:08:40

And I think the structure that Supervisor William was referring to is called the Renewable Portfolio Standard. So essentially, the PUC orders the utilities and other load serving entities like the CCEs and CCAs to purchase a certain percent of the energy that they deliver to customers from renewable sources located either within the state or it could be outside of the state as long as the first point of interconnection is within the state.

So that's speaking to the goal that Judy was referring to, trying to get to 100% by 2030. So we're trying to lock it in earlier.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:09:18

Then I had one other question and that has to do with electrification. And I see you know, I know cars account for the vast majority 41 percent of the emissions and gas appliances you have down at 12%. At least in my district there's a massive pushback, especially from the Hispanic community over wanting to take away gas appliances. In Santa Maria that is like a no-go. That's the danger zone right? So what I'm trying to figure out is between that 41% and the 12%, What else is, seems to be like easier low-hanging fruit than going after something that for me is like causing so much angst in the community? What's between that 41 and 12 that is also something we could focus on may not have the pushback.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:10:19

Sure, building electrification comes to mind so in addition to your gas powered appliances there's building codes and New construction, for example. It doesn't have to be retrofitting. We're not trying to take anything away from anybody just to be really clear we are offering an opportunity there are health risks associated with gas powered appliances in the home and so for anybody who is interested in replacing, we have an opportunity but were not ever advocating going in and actually you know

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:10:55

right? So it would be all new. So the problem is going to be is if you ever go to try to replace your gas stove at some point, you're gonna have an issue.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:11:03

Not because of 3CE?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:11:05

No no no I'm saying State of California.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:11:07

Right potentially

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:11:09

yeah At this point in time I mean that what the state does not have anything in place preventing people from doing new construction including natural gas We are as a county considering an ordinance restricting natural gas for new construction, but again just replacing your stove would not trigger something like that. And just pointing out too that you know 3CE's programs when you layer them with things like the 3C-REN program we have a statewide program called TEC We just did a case study on a resident who got an entirely free heat pump water heater. So some good examples of ways that we can make it work with low cost.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:11:56

No, and I think that's the biggest selling point so far for 3C is the rebate program and the incentive program is... It's not the heavy-handed stuff. It's more, hey let's help you get to that place where you need to be. Thank you!

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:12:11

That would be a great softball if you have any slides on the incentives, or can you put those up and maybe go over. Our

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:12:21

programs?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:12:21

Yeah. I mean...

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:12:23

I don't have anything beyond what I brought today. We can pull back up the slide that will talk about the investment that we've already made in the county

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:12:34

Or how about just a slide with the contact information for the incentives?

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:12:39

But there is another one that does lay out the incentives, at least on mine. It was Slide 19. I don't know if I have the same presentation though.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:12:50

So here's residential right?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:12:54

So I mean, I think the really shocking thing is how many incentives for Electrify Your Ride were done last year. And that's the price it you know, the incentives and that's on top of now what state offers, which is between one and three thousand per car. And then what the federal government is offering for, you know, the Chevrolet and Ford and other vehicles manufactured in the United States $7500 tax credit.

Now's the best time to buy an electric car, especially a lot of the companies have recently cut prices to try to reach the mass market in a more meaningful way. To make this less of a sort of more of a middle class endeavor. And, of course the incentives for chargers is substantially more than you're normally going to get for utility as well because we... Is it true that we not only cover the charger but we cover

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:14:07

readiness?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:14:09

So parts labor to a certain level.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:14:12

If your panel needs an upgrade there's additional incentives for that And also there are for both Electrify Your Ride and Electrify Your Home an additional $1,000 for income qualified customers for each individual program. So there are a lot of incentives.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:14:32

In fact I know that one of the folks who's been coming to us with attendance has took advantage of this We have heard a lot of discussion

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:14 – 1:2120 turns

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:14:57

Several new projects for new housing in Guadalupe, and Cuyama, and Goleta. Even the Village Senior Housing Project. So they're offering $5,000 a unit for developers who want to have their development be all electric.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:15:15

And I believe Hope Village is all electric and utilizing 3CE incentives as well.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:15:24

Awesome. Is there any other questions? Is there public comment?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:15:28

Chair Williams, this is Supervisor Hartman. I did have a few questions.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:15:33

Yes, Supervisor Hartman.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:15:35

My first one has to do with the solvency and credit rating of 3CE. Initially when we were pursuing this option, there were a lot of questions, a lot of predictions. And I just wonder if you could comment on

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:15:49

that. I actually have an answer here for that. I think we have a grade A, I believe credit rating which we were the first and perhaps the only CCA to have that credit rating. We are financially solid. We have. I think $19 million in reserves at the moment If you just give me a moment to find my notes, I can give you specific information. And

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:16:32

then I'll just add a request that because our climate action plan really outlines progress in a more meaningful way in terms of raw number of electric vehicles, it would be great just to sort of have a progress report Especially with Santa Barbara, but eventually with San Luis too because they're just joining on number of EV incentives. Just not the dollar amount but the number of individual awards being done year by year and then the cumulative you know...

And of course Ashley could probably provide the baseline from DMV records which if we don't get those SPCAG does so we can do that.

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:17:21

There's also a statewide website where you can track hybrid and EV car usage.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:17:27

Great, thank you.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:17:28

And I can provide that for you for an incorporated Santa Barbara County.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:17:34

You could just do it for all of the 3C members in Santa Barbara County cumulatively. It's easier.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:17:40

Number of people who have taken advantage Rebates. Terrific, okay to answer the question about our financial solvency we received an A S&P rating in October of 2020. The A rating recognizes 3CE's stability within the California CCA market and the strong socio-economic conditions of 3CEs growing service area. S&Ps rating action stressed 3CE strong economic fundamentals comprehensive governance structure, robust energy risk management policy and experienced executive leadership as contributing factors to 3CE being the first CCA to receive an A rating and a stable outlook.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:18:25

Thank you. And I had two other questions. The first is we have an organization, the North County Econ Alliance that sponsored an energy forum featuring a speaker from the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability and the focus on building electrification was what a fast rate we need to convert to heat pumps for heating and cooling If the state of California is to meet its goals, so I just wondered what programs 3CE has around heat pumps. One of the biggest challenges is contractors and getting them up and able to install these. So could you talk about that a little bit?

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:19:14

Absolutely, we do have an incentive. The slide is up for our residential customers for heat pump water heater replacement similar to the gas stove replacement and the similar that incentive is the same to address the workforce issue I can say that our leadership recognizes the issue and is working on incentives outreach education To to address the issue of qualified contractors to actually do the work.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:19:52

Thank

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:19:52

you. Supervisor Hartman through the chair, 3C-REN is also working very closely with 3CE to provide workforce training opportunities for contractors so they can move into that heat pump and heat pump water heater and HVAC space and also providing incentives directly to contractors in addition to the incentives provided to homeowners for heat pump technologies by 3CE

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:20:22

Good, well we all need an education in that and soon.

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:20:28

And just to clarify our incentives for the HVAC and heat pump water heater are paid to the contractors?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:20:37

Thank you. And my final question has to do with the City of Santa Barbara is their own CCA, and they have a very aggressive program for rooftop solar. I am very supportive of rooftop solar both because of the microgrid resilience that it can offer as well as backup during PSPS events. Could you talk a little bit about 3CE and what your perspective is on that?

1:21 – 1:2511 turns

CommentJudy YoungProposedself-stated1:21:08

So we are an energy procurement agency, and we don't have incentives or programs. And I do not believe we have any outlook to provide rooftop solar or get into rooftop solar. So as an agency that is responsible for procurement for these five counties, we have a little bit of Mission than City of Santa Barbara's at CCA. Well, it's not a CCA but yeah It's CCA okay

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:21:47

Maybe I could also help Supervisor Hartman. The PUC has determined a lower rebate rate for solar going forward, it's still pretty generous but not as generous as it once was and it remains to be seen whether that will be as effective at promulgating rooftop solar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We have maintained support, as I understand it, at higher than the PUC decision but not at the old rate. That's my understanding.

So it's essentially I just want to make sure that we're getting the tariff that rooftop solar folks get back from us for providing rooftop solar. You probably understand it better than most people, but it's complicated because how much essentially we subsidize has to do with when the true update is in a given year and what the rate of return per kilowatt is.

But for comparison, the City of Santa Barbara does not provide any vehicle incentives. So I mean to me and you'd be free to try to give me input as your representative but to me the main deal is providing enough vehicle incentives because it's the best bang for the buck for emission reduction. Questions or comments? Let's go to public comment.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:23:50

Chair Williams and members of the board, we have no request to speak for this item.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:23:58

Supervisor Caps?

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:24:00

Well I can make a motion to receive this report. I believe that's the action and I just want to add my thanks to Chair Williams for his energy, no pun intended on this effort as well as CEO Miyasato. I can tell how much time It takes and it's worthwhile. Thank you. So I move to file and receive, I believe that's the action. What's that? And CEQA.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:24:23

I'll second. Of

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:24:24

course

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:24:25

there is a motion in a second. Any further comment? Let's do a roll call. Oh, Supervisor Nelson, do you have a comment? Roll Call

Roll-call vote 0–0 motion in a second. Any further comment? Let's do a roll call. Oh, Supervisor Nelson, do you have a comment? Roll Call · 5 under review
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson. Hi, Supervisor Labanino. Hi. Supervisor Hartman. I. Supervisor Caps. I and Chair Williams.
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:24:45

I motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:24:48

And chair Williams, I just want to thank Ashley Watkins and George caption because they are the driving force on the staff level. So we appreciate all their work in their diligence on all of these issues.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:25:01

Let's go to departmental item number three.

1:25 – 1:304 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role1:25:07

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an ad hoc library committee update.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:25:19

This is serendipity because you know those library folks are good at spreading the words. Let's get them to spread the word about electric car incentives too so. True

CommentSam SipesiProposed · by introduction1:25:28

true. Good morning chair Williams members of the board pleased to be here to present I'm going to turn it over to Ashley Watkins and Kerry Koppel. Ashley volunteered to take over the duties of writer as if saving the planet wasn't enough, she's taking on the libraries as well. And Kerry is with Legacy Works and they help facilitate all the meetings. So I'm going to turn it over them. I'll sit back there and answer any questions they may not be able to answer.

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction1:26:01

Thank you, George. There are some connections between sustainability and libraries. Libraries have been a great resource for our DIY toolkits, so check them out if you haven't already. But today's item is to provide an update on the work of the Library Ad Hoc Committee, specifically the governance and funding options that were explored by the Ad Hoc Committee and their recommendations.

The... Let's see. Oh, do we not get all? All right. Here we go. So specific recommended actions for today are to receive and file that update on the work of the Library Ad Hoc Committee, appoint Zone 5 Library Administrator which is the City of Carpinteria to the Library Ad Hoc Committee. Zone 5 did not exist when the Library Ad Hoc Committee was first created.

Provide staff direction regarding the recommendations of the Ad Hock Committee and then finally determine this item is not subject to CEQA. So as you know, the countywide library system is unique. It's a partnership between counties and cities. The cities of Santa Maria, Santa Barbara, Lompoc, Goleta and Carpinteria are referred to as managing cities and each have municipal libraries that are funded and governed by their city councils.

The county contributes funding to these libraries and also contracts with four of the libraries, the ones that are outlined in white. To manage city and county branch libraries in the City of Guadalupe, Buellton, Solvayne and County branches in the unincorporated areas of Orkut, Los Alamos, Vandenberg Village, Cuyama and Montecito. Those smaller cities also contribute funding to the libraries in their jurisdictions.

Just pointing out for clarity that the East Side Library in City of Santa Barbara for budget purposes is included with the city of Santa Barbara's main library. And the libraries are managed in zone Zones which are indicated by these numbers. So the Ad Hoc Committee was established largely in part to outline a path to achieving a sustainable and equitable finance and governance systems for county libraries. Local governments have been the primary funders of libraries in California since the state phased out library operation fundings in the early 2010s, In the face of this funding crisis and the fact that Santa Barbara County libraries have faced. budget shortfalls for over a decade, the board established the Ad Hoc Committee.

Members of the ad hoc include Supervisor Hartman, Supervisor Williams, Mr. Shaption, four of the library directors which will become five after your action today, Pat Saley, a Friends of the Library member, Judith Dale, a Library Advisory Committee member all working together to Try to tackle this funding issue. Once the committee was formed, they requested facilitation support and Legacy Works Groups, which is a Santa Barbara based nonprofit with expertise and supporting collaborative processes was hired to provide that participation. So today I have with me Dr. Kerry Capel With Legacy Works, she's the facilitator who has been working with the Ad Hoc Committee over the last couple of years and she is going to present the rest of the slides.

1:30 – 1:491 turns

CommentCarrie KappelProposedself-stated1:30:22

Thank you, Ashley. Thank you Chair Williams and members of the board. It's a pleasure to present to you today. As Ashley said my name is Carrie Kappel and I'm with Legacy Works Group and I've had the pleasure of working with dedicated members of the Library Ad Hoc Committee for the last few years. And we have been working together to try to address a series of kind of interlocking problems and the recommendations that were putting forward today, we think will serve to help.

Address chronic budget shortfalls, rebuild library staffing and services which have been eroded over time by the budget problems we've faced. Improve equity and address the needs of the small and unincorporated branch libraries. Reduce dependence on friends dollars private sources which have been used to cover core operating expenses in recent years. And provide a forum for communication and joint decision making among all the different jurisdictions that that work to benefit our libraries.

And finally, enhance coordination and planning to try to strengthen this county wide system. So I wanna, before getting into the ad hoc committee recommendations provide a little bit of context in terms of the funding sources and levels in the library system right now. So these are data from 2021-22 last fiscal year and you can see that there's a mix of revenue sources that contribute to funding our libraries overall the total budget is around $15 million With 4.4 million coming from the county and 8.5 about coming from the cities, uh, the county contributions are in dark blue on this graph and the city contributions are in the lighter blue.

There are a couple of tax measures that were contributed towards libraries in 21-22 that are highlighted here. For Santa Maria, this is Measure L which is the only, I'm sorry, Measure U for Santa Maria which was a sales tax measure This is obviously goes into city general funds, but dollars were used toward library funding in the previous year and have been used in the past. And in Goleta, the yellow represents Measure U which is the only dedicated library tax in the county right now it's a parcel tax in CSA 3.

The other funding sources indicated here in magenta, you can just barely see those are the Friends dollars which do contribute a significant portion of the budget in Montecito and Carpentaria but our overall small relative amounts. And then gray, the other category that's funding from fees and grants and other sources It's worth noting that overall library funding and per capita spending in Santa Barbara County puts us below the state average.

This graph shows per capita spending at each of the libraries across the county benchmarked against the average per capita spending in the state, which is $42. per person. So our range is from $11 to $61. Highest levels are in Santa Barbara City and the east side branch, I will note though that this Santa Barbara's budget includes allocated costs that are charged for HR IT and other administrative costs so that total $61 doesn't go to per capita funding But a portion of it does, obviously.

So in you all have heard updates from us before on the work of the ad hoc committee and I don't want to belabor that history. I just want to hit a few highlights before we get into their recommendations for this year. But this group has been working really hard together and has achieved a number of important milestones including really building a shared understanding common sense of purpose and shared principles for how we want to move forward with this work. Each year, we've worked with your help to address the budget deficits on a case-by-case basis In 2019-2020, we worked to benchmark the library system against state and national standards for libraries of similar size and populations.

And set a set of recommended minimum service levels for our branch libraries which has been in it that was an important milestone and one that we hope that the board will continue to see that as a target for funding for the library system We've done a lot of research to assess potential options for supplemental funding for libraries from public sources, and revised the library agreement last year to make it a better representation of the current state of things and to clarify expectations between the county and the cities. And we've assessed potential alternative governance models. So with all of that research and discussion, we got to a point at the end I want to start by talking about the ad hoc committee meeting of 2021 where it was clear we needed to engage city leaders in these conversations in order to assess their readiness and willingness to consider potential changes in library funding and governance.

So last year's ad hoc committee invited city leaders to join us and particularly to assess interest So we looked at many different options, but the in exploring other models across the state that have been used to fund and administer libraries. One that the group became enthusiastic about was the possibility of using a joint powers authority As an opportunity to provide a forum for joint decision making and a mechanism to levy a tax that would inject new dedicated and supplemental funding to support libraries across the county. There are five other California counties that administer their library systems using a joint powers authority, including Sonoma which is a county with sort of similar size in character to Santa Barbara.

One of the things that we found from talking to library directors from these other systems is that centralization has generally improved performance and equity and reduced conflicts and costs within their systems. They all pointed to the fact that dedicated and sufficient revenue was really the key ingredient to their success. We also learned in this research and in these conversations that the JPAs are a highly customizable instrument. They're not just a cookie cutter, one size fits all solution.

That customization presents some potential barriers and that it's a negotiated process and we've got to get at all parties to the table but it also gives us a lot of flexibility to design something that works for our unique situation. So in last year's sessions, the ad hoc committee and city representatives who joined us considered several different options. We looked at the full-fledged library JPI option modeled after those other counties that I referenced who are using this to administer their libraries that would have centralized administration and a new tax.

We also looked at a kind of intermediate model where a JPA might be used to levy a new tax and the county branches would be administered by it, and other city branches could choose whether to opt in or not. In general folks thought this was maybe too complicated of an option. In our conversations last year another option emerged which is the idea of using a JPA basically to manage the finances of the library Sorry, a library finance JPA which would administer a new tax provide a forum for the parties to decide how to allocate that funding but still use the existing zone structure to administer the libraries.

And then the last option we considered was an option that did not include a JPA but would instead rely on the county to levy a tax for supplemental funding and we would continue with the existing governance structure for administering libraries via the zones So to give you a little more context around that, we compared the current revenue mix for Santa Barbara County to the revenue models used by those five counties that administer their libraries as joint powers authorities.

And I think that the big takeaways here are again just to emphasize that dedicated revenue is really key and it makes up over half to their entire budget in these other situations But all of them primarily rely on dedicated either parcel or sales taxes to make up most of their budget. In contrast to our budget, which is primarily general fund contributions, the one exception being Goleta Mejorel, which you can see there in the light blue at the left.

The other, I think, takeaway from this is that these are some of the best funded library systems in the county. I mean, in the state and their budget ranges from budgets range from 14 million to 67 million dollars for Santa Clara, which is obviously a large and populous county. To provide some additional grounding for that, we We looked at the basic needs of our library system, and in 2020 as I mentioned the ad hoc committee recommended minimum service level standards for the branch libraries based on state and national benchmarks. We didn't make recommendations from municipal libraries it being the prerogative of cities to set their standards for their own municipal libraries.

But in our analysis, none of the branches, none of the city county branches or the county branches met all of those standards last year. And it looks like it would cost about $710,000 to bring the branches up to the minimum service levels, or about 5% of the total budget. This need for enhanced funding just to meet those minimum service levels is an ongoing need.

As we researched options for potential public funding to supplement libraries, we looked at both general taxes that could be levied by the county independent of any change in library governance and special taxes that would lead to dedicated funding for libraries and could be administered by the county or through a JPA. This table provides some ballpark estimates of revenue potential for both parcel and sales taxes in either countywide or in the unincorporated areas only. So on the right side, you see the unincorporated figures which could be parcel taxes that could be generated from the 38% of parcels that are unincoporated and the sales tax revenue which is about 11% of total From the unincorporated areas only.

You can see from these estimates that range from 1.2 million to 10 and a half million, depending on which square you're in here that there's a significant opportunity to close that gap that I just referenced in terms of Generating supplemental funding to help us meet the minimum service levels. Any of these options could do that and then some of them could provide additional funding that would allow us to really restore, expand and enhance library services and facilities.

Which of these directions we go, a parcel or a sales tax countywide or unincorporated only really and what revenue generation level to shoot for really depends on the voters and the city's interest in participation. And for this reason, the ad hoc committee is recommending that the board support public polling this year to try to get an answer to this question.

As we were considering the potential appetite for new taxes, we thought it was important to look at taxes that have already been passed in the cities across the county. So this is sales tax measures with the most recent ones that passed just in November at the top of the list there with those two new measures in Goleta and Solvang All the cities except Bulton are now at 8.75 to 9% total sales tax. The sales tax dollars obviously go into the general funds of cities, they're not dedicated but many of them did pass with language in the descriptions that referenced libraries as one of the potential beneficiaries and most of them have ended up leading to increases in local library funding over time The other thing to note here is that all of these needed just 50% plus one voters to be able to pass.

But three out of seven of them, all from North County actually passed with greater than a two thirds margin. Let's see what else. One thing we did discuss in our conversations is that any new parcel tax, this is obviously about sales taxes on the slide but any new parcel tax would have to take into account the fact that voters in CSA 3 in the Goleta area already have a dedicated parcel tax for libraries so there will have to be some conversation about Ways to avoid double taxation there if a parcel tax is the direction that it seems like we should go.

The other thing I just want to note is that the city of Guadalupe did have tried to pass a library parcel tax that was defeated in 2012 as a dedicated tax that needed a two thirds margin, but about 58.1% for what would have been at $20 per parcel tax. All right, so coming back to those options that the ad hoc committee and our city representative guests discussed last year and our recommendation at this point to the board.

You've now seen much of the evidence that we And I think the key takeaways for us were that a JPA could help to lead to greater financial stability for the library system by providing a mechanism for a dedicated supplemental tax source. It also would provide a forum for joint decision making between the cities and counties. In our conversations, municipal libraries really felt it was important that they retain local control over libraries' staffing and budgets. And for that reason the committee rejected the first two options on this list which would have libraries be administered under the control of a central library administrator. Instead they opted for this Library Finance JPA which gives us a mechanism to levy a countywide tax A forum for everyone to come together and decide how that money is allocated, but local control is retained by the municipal libraries in the zones for making decisions about how the libraries are run.

There also was less enthusiasm within the committee about the last option there, where the county would levy a tax for the reasons that it doesn't provide a forum for joint decision making. The authority for how the money would be allocated would rest just with the county and there may not be the same revenue generation potential if that tax were only in the unincorporated areas as you saw from the earlier slide.

So the committee would like to recommend that the Board of Supervisors and the cities pursue the finance JPA model with a dedicated revenue source, to be determined by research and voter polling. And if there seems to be sufficient interest to be placed on the 2024 or 2025 ballot. We also request that the county prepare a letter to the cities to continue and deepen the outreach and engagement with the cities, laying out the foundational background that we've presented here, articulating this proposed direction and requesting their ongoing participation. And we can follow that with presentations to city councils and city managers to answer any questions they may have.

There are a few additional next steps that we offer for your consideration for the county or the ad hoc committee to pursue, including continuing to further investigate other options for attacks and how it might be configured. Conducting the voter polling that I already referenced outreach to cities answering key questions about the design of the JPA. This is sort of where we paused our conversations with the cities But there's much more conversation that needs to be had about how the JPA, what powers it would have who the members would be and how the voting structure would be configured.

And finally, Though I didn't cover this in my earlier slides, one of the things that the ad hoc committee has discussed in the past is the option of hiring a halftime library contracts administrator who could lead the county's efforts to implement these recommendations and support the countywide library system with fiscal oversight strategic planning and collaborative fundraising. This person would not be Taking away obviously the authority or duties of the library directors, but instead providing some additional capacity at the county level and expertise on libraries.

With that I'm happy to take any questions that you may have.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:49 – 1:586 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:49:30

Questions from the board? CEO did you want to say something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:40

Supervisors, just I thought it was a very good report. Thank you very much for that work and legacy works. And I just want to remind the board in the public that the board did in 2018 a report from management partners to look at the library system and from that grew the ad hoc committee and one of the recommendations was as reported was an option was to begin looking at a JPA.

And when you see those numbers, I also wanna remind the board something that we sometimes forget and that 2018 report said and I'm quoting it I talked about the current library systems and they looked at different comparable areas. And so the variations in county library organization were outlined in the report, and the main distinction between county libraries is where they received dedicated tax revenue in support of the libraries or not. And so many 23 county library systems have a dedicated revenue source, and this is usually a property tax allocation that was levied pre-Prop 13.

The other type of county library systems are those that do not have a dedicated revenue source. Funding is typically allocated as a budgetary discretionary action, and this is the case for Santa Barbara County. Organizational and county library systems are further differentiated by their use of contracts etc. And in their report back in 2018, they said their analysis showed that some unique features of our library system. The first is that relative to the counties in their case study, Santa Barbara County provides the most discretionary general fund in support of the library services. So it's just a reminder that some of the comparables was because they have a dedicated tax revenue that was established pre Prop 13. In our county, that was not the case and I think that's why some of the issues discussed about needing more revenue are apt because that is the reason why we're not seeing the same level of funding as other counties.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:51:33

Yeah, I think that's useful to the framework I have had is not that there's high level of funding in some other counties and some of them are embarrassingly better. Sonoma, which has a little bit less population than we do, has more than twice as much funding per capita. It's not a sign of their great virtue. In fact, sometimes allocating a lot of your general fund is a sign of more virtue but it's a sign of sustainability And there's been a lot of volatility in the last decade in the library sector for various funding reasons.

And here, I would say what it created was a desire to decentralize our library system which we've all seen over the last six years The first theory put forward in decentralization has been that we can do it cheaper. That has not ended up being the case for anybody who is decentralized, however the real thing that they wanted was self-determination but as evidenced from our increased black gold costs this year, it's not decreasing our costs, it's actually making our costs go up so at some level we've got to try around us into some level of centralization if we are going to arrest this spiral and the JPA model is the one that multiple jurisdictions could agree to.

There's really no point in having a JPA unless there is a taxing revenue component of the JPA. And that's really what all the debates and discussions at the ad hoc have kind of come to, and I think especially Supervisor Hartman and myself Since we serve in this capacity, would like to understand if the board is behind us in terms of at least trying to see if the public wants this better level of service.

Wants us to meet minimum standards and because the ad hoc process has provided us model about how we could Supervisor

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.841:54:11

Lavinia. Thank you, Mr Chair and we just really appreciate all the time you guys have spent on this um it is a and when they said Ashley not only are you saving the planet but she also has to figure out the library I said which one's easier probably saving the planet right because this is a ball of snakes um I have no problem uh going out and polling I have my own sneaking suspicion of what it's going to show you, and I don't think it's going to be a reflection on whether people feel like they want to see minimum standards upheld. I think everybody is going to say yeah, I want minimum standards upheld. I want more funding for libraries but I don t want to pay for it. I think you guys should figure out a way to pay for it. That s generally what people think is we have to reset what our priorities are.

I think people generally, at least a lot of the ones I talk to you feel like they're taxed to the point where they don't feel like they should be taxed anymore that it's more a challenge for us to deal with the resources that we have and put them in places where we have value. The problem is there's way more values that we like to uphold and there are tax dollars out there. So, uh, we'll find out. Uh, I'm okay with going out and polling on this. Um, but it's sad that I guess that's the only option that there is as we go through the whole subcommittee and we come back and we're like, okay, we need more text dollars to do it. And what if, what if it comes back in the Uh, what do we do then if it comes back and you know there's just not the support for it?

Then it's then it's back to us and we've got her. You know. Change the chairs around so will see what happens. I appreciate all the work. I know that there's no easy answer otherwise we would have this done a long time ago, so it's going to be up to the people I guess.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:56:17

Supervisor Nelson

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction1:56:18

yes thank you chair Williams. If a tax, parcel tax or sales tax moves forward is there an expectation of maintenance of effort from County General Fund and County Sales Tax? Or is that something that would potentially supplant that funding because I think that's a part of that discussion. It may actually help the project if you, or the tax measure. People realize that money that they think is going towards roads or some other program or public safety would be returned back to the general fund for those other priorities instead of more libraries here. I do think as I've been saying, I believe we are very generous with our library funding in our county for quite some time.

I know we like to throw around numbers of somewhere between $8 and $9 per capita in our county for funding. But really, it's more like $30 because really what we're looking at is it's a municipal service that we owe to the unincorporated residents and cities have that responsibility for city residents. And if you actually look at our numbers, we're well above $30 per capita for what are our responsibilities? Now, we're generous to the cities and we contribute to their populations as well. That's not always appreciated, as we all know, but as we work with our city partners But I think that's part of the conversation that needs to be evaluated as well. I'm not a huge fan of polling residents for tax measures, You know, I understand why some would want to go down that route.

But I do think it's a route that the board or others want to move forward with. I think it's one of those things where you got to sell back to the public and not find out how to manipulate the public to eventually prove that tax. So there is this philosophical difference I have on that. That is a challenge for me. And I think these are things that we need to continue to wrestle with.

And I'm not sure exactly where I'm at at this point on it, but those are kind of my perspectives.

1:58 – 2:069 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:58:17

Supervisor Katz?

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.901:58:19

Thank you. I just wanted to weigh in with my support of the work of this committee. Again, I'm news but I hear Supervisor Levineau use the word ball of snakes. There's so much contention and turf and things that I have yet understand because fundamentally, we all love libraries. We all support libraries. We all want libraries in our communities. We want them to be a place where children can go, where people who need access to the internet can take haven. So I think it's just important to constantly as we have today just affirm that and as we try to sort out the funding mechanisms when we're talking about polling.

Open to that, I just want us. We've talked about a lot of polling and a lot of different taxes to be very prudent about how we do so. And because if we did a bunch of polls, they can potentially dilute the results. They can also cost a lot of money. So I'm happy to to weigh in on my little bit of expertise in this area, if that's at all helpful, because I just don't want us to spend a lot Thanks.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:59:33

Supervisor Williams?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.921:59:36

Supervisor Harman?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.891:59:37

Yes, well it's gratifying to see the high level of support for libraries. Sometimes we do hear people say in the age of computers where people have access to information why do we need libraries? I think they've evolved so now you have a library of things, you have access to lots of digital materials through libraries their community centers. They're really Meeting places for civic engagement oftentimes and as supervisor caps mentioned jobs computer access so libraries in a day and age when We're losing a lot of public space a lot of opportunities to come together Libraries are that place in each community?

That does serve as a community center. So I think they're Tremendously important and I value today's meeting just to underscore that I Also, I am supportive of trying to find some Do the polling and try to find some dedicated source of resources The costs keep going up and general fund Revenues are, as Supervisor Williams noted, volatile not sustainable and for something that's such an important community institution I think it's a mistake not to figure out how to fund that in a reliable way.

And I also wanted to express my support for Ryder Bailey and George Chapshin, and now Ashley. This has been a tremendous amount of work for them as well as Legacy Works. And probably most of all were the library administrators from each of the cities who spent an enormous amount of their own time helping us particularly on the benchmarking effort Which is so valuable to see where we stand relative to other states and other counties in California.

So this has been an enormous effort, and our conclusion is if we don't find a dedicated source of funding I don't think we can really count on the stabilities of our libraries going forward. So we have to come up with something.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:02:10

Supervisor Nelson.

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:02:11

Yes, thank you Chair Williams. I just also wanted to add to my comments I'm with supervisor Hartman and the board on Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈37s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:02:57

Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. I think it's useful to look at Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the Board of Supervisors. Libraries are a tremendous public resource, but we are at a point that the funding is so low. that none of these facilities are open all the time. It's like, you know, there's a certain level of underutilization that just comes about from the level of funding that we have. Even Santa Barbara, the best funded system isn't even open on Sundays, right? You know, one of the two days a week that people would use it the most And so, you know, there comes a point of inefficiency that just doesn't make sense. Like the money is so low that that is something that's almost universal within the system is that we don't even have extensive hours everywhere.

And then the other is the level of conflict and the level of inefficiency that creates in all of our institutions. You know, none of us would waste time fighting with our neighboring jurisdictions over 10 or 20 grand in public safety. In fact we don't even account for that in some basic things between cities and counties at that level of money. But we will plunge a knife into each other over 10 or 20 grand in libraries, and it's a level of inefficiency in time for staff or elected officials that you really wonder about, right? Like is this really the best way for us to handle the institution? And it really comes about because of scarcity And so I would just argue that this is something we really got to look at if we can solve structurally.

So that is the goal I hope we will reach for. Is there a public comment?

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:06:00

Chair Williams and members of the board, we do have one request to speak. We'll move to Zoom with Stuart Kasten.

2:06 – 2:1213 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:06:11

Hello.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:06:12

Hi Stuart, we can hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:06:14

Good thank you. So first I participated in these ad hoc committee meetings on behalf of the leader and I wanted to say first you know we are very supportive of the process it's been discussed for quite a long time and so it's really necessary. I guess one of the things that is that's come up that I've observed Just the past month or so. If we did a JPA, it's going to be a specific tax and that whichever kind it's going to be specific. And so that automatically raises the threshold and becomes a challenge. But the value of it is as a dedicated tax means the money is guaranteed to go for that purpose. It stood out to me, that value stood out to me this year when we just passed in Goleta our sales tax I just want to say thank you to the Board of Supervisors for being so patient with Measure B and still struggled to hit some of the priorities that we had identified.

We did add $200,000 for libraries but we couldn't achieve the target we had for pavement and costs have gone up. It's a nice thing to know if As far as surveying the public, I think it's valuable to survey the public and we did talk about that in the meeting. And one of the reasons that there's a value in surveying the public is because there are choices that you make. It's not simply about first you need to know well are you close to being able to hit the threshold, the voting threshold with two-thirds vote? But the other thing is which taxes are going to be more likely And so there's not only a parcel tax and a sales tax. There are other taxes, and I don't know which the county is able or JPA is able to levy but business license tax or document transfer tax or property transfer tax.

All of those are options that maybe are more supported by members of the public and it's worth finding out if there's a greater opportunity there. Like in Goleta, where we have an existing parcel tax. I wanted to just add that we support this process. We appreciate the work of the committee and the idea behind it, and we look forward to helping. And just one last observation for K-9 Dumas. Our library has a program called the Paws to Read Program where kids read to dogs, and this might be an excellent opportunity Now that he has more time on his hands. Thank you.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:09:17

Thank you anymore discussion?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:09:22

Chair Williams and members of the board, we have no further requests to speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09:26

Chair Williams, I do have a question and that was we're going to be mine. We'll talk to the board and the board given us direction to budget funding for some polling it was for the unincorporated area for sales tax if we do for the library tax it would be obviously the whole county and so we'll try to Minimize costs as much as possible and we'll look at that. But my question was maybe to Ashley on the ad hoc Was there any quite any conversation if we do a countywide poll where any of the other libraries going to contribute to that?

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction2:10:00

I think that's something we would probably need to determine when we do some of the outreach around, you know, the different cities' appetites for the JPA and the funding.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:12

I think

CommentSam SipesiProposed · by introduction2:10:13

maybe Supervisor Williams is probably going to tell you the same thing I did. I know that Councilman Kasten was at the meetings and he said Goleta would consider it, you know, these 5,000 or so towards that and maybe go to the other cities but he did express that interest.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:10:30

Yeah, there was two. All of the city representatives that were there expressed support but there was only two cities there so I think we need to ask definitively for a number one You know, are you interested in this? Because if one of the big cities was against us having a county-wide tax it would be a very big complication. And then if they are interested, well, pony up five grand and help us out on the ballin'. So I think that's...

That would be part of next steps that maybe we should endeavor to do.

CommentMadam ClerkProposed · by introduction2:11:16

And that was something similar that we did for Community Choice Energy when we were studying. That was, we did do letters to the cities and ask for a contribution to do some of that feasibility study work.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:11:27

Oh, and I also wanted to note that that Pepper Maria has also contributed some of their new sales tax to the library. But it's not reflected in the slide because you only put dedicated taxes in those calculations.

CommentCarrie KappelProposedself-stated2:11:41

Yeah, I think for fiscal year twenty one twenty two we didn't have that those data broken out but that's that's absolutely true thanks for noting that Can I say something in response to Supervisor Nelson's question about maintenance of effort? This is a that is a topic that came up in the committee. I think at this point there isn't a decision on that front, but everyone is very much interested in supplemental funding rather than supplanting the existing funding knowing that we're in this level of scarcity and there's ways to go just to get up to minimum service levels and then begin And I think there was also a discussion about well, is it good would be library stand alone or would it be.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:12 – 2:247 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:12:37

With something else, I think there was openness to what our shared needs in the county and what needs the public is interested in. So that's just another reason that polling is useful. Is there a motion from the board on the recommendations?

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.892:13:02

Partnering with staff recommendation

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:13:07

Is there a second?

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.902:13:10

Second.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:13:11

And this is not just staff recommendation, but it's also the recommendation of the ad hoc committee. Further discussion? Then let's take a vote. Roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion from the board on the recommendations? Partnering with staff recommendation Is there a second? Second. And this is not just staff rec
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? No. Supervisor Lavinino? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye Supervisor Kaps? Aye Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:13:32

Motion passes four to one

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:13:34

We will take a 10 minute break and then take up departmental item number four. We'll reconvene the meeting and we'll go to departmental item number four.

2:24 – 2:292 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:24:42

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the Public Works Department Board of Directors Laguna County Sanitation District. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District ordinance relative to service changes, connection charges and trunks or fees and resolutions relative to the collection of service changes on the tax roll. This project is located within the first fourth and fifth districts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:25:10

Since it shows up Good morning Chair Williams and members of the Board of Directors of the Laguna County Sanitation District. Today's recommendations are for sewer rate charges and fees for next fiscal year The district is a special district that's dependent to the County of Santa Barbara created in 1958. It provides wastewater services to the Orcutt and unincorporated Santa Maria area.

It's regulated by several governmental regulatory agencies and permits, and our mission is to conserve and protect water resources Current activities, the phase one plant upgrade is in progress. It is due for completion in February of next year and partial completion meaning it will be running in about an August for a substantial completion as it goes through startup The annual rates and fee ordinance public noticing pursuant to Prop 218 was mailed out. It's important to note that we have about 10,908 parcels which we did receive for valid protests. The hearing date was published pursuant the government code in the Samaria Times.

The sewer charges pay for annual operation maintenance and replacement as well as reserves. It's collected on the tax roll, and this year we are near four of a rate plan study that proposed a one-and-a-half percent rate increase per comparison. The CPI was 7.4%. The sewer rate charge itself is proposed to be annually at $1,121.55 over last year that's $16.50 per year or $1.38 a month for a monthly rate of $93.46. Multiple family residential units are $911.12 per year. Schools are $58.18 per capita per year and commercial is based on the waste load for suspended solids in BOD and the amount of flow.

Countywide, we have a table here that shows the level of treatment by agency and how much their monthly rate is and whether or not they have an increase. Living in Sanitation District is at $93.46. The average is $76.34. Total water cost comparisons. This is an average water and sewer bill combined. I do this because the sanitation district does a couple of things that in some cases, the Water Fund for other agencies does.

Laguna Sanitation recycles water whereas that's paid for by the Water Fund for Santa Barbara and Goleta, for example. Also our prior upgrade in 2001 to 2003 was to comply with regulatory requirements to reduce salts in the effluent And that was handled in the Santa Maria Basin by the cities of Guadalupe and Santa Maria by buying state water. While Golden State Water Company did buy some state water, it wasn't enough to offset the water quality coming in.

Countywide that the two water and sewer together is $171.21 per year on Laguna Sanitation and Golden State combined is $148.06 per year. This action also recommends setting developer charges and fees for next year. We have trunkline fees which fund the collection system improvements, and connection charges which provide equity buy-in to the treatment plant and the discharge mechanism typically recycling.

The charges for next year are prescribed by either ordinance or by agreement. The connection charge is suggested to change per residential unit equivalent based on the construction cost index for Los Angeles, which was 7.6%. Therefore that would be $9,759. For trunk line fees, the district completed a construction of a trunk line in 2001 for the Dutard-Solomon trunk line. Also based on the construction cost index 7.6 and is at $1,246 per residential unit equivalent.

Bradley trunkline was a developer built trunk line and we have a reimbursement agreement which is based on the prime rate that's 7.5% and therefore per residential unit equivalent it's three thousand two hundred twenty four dollars It was the one with the water and

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:30 – 2:3416 turns

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:30:21

There's always an important slide for the public to understand. The cost of water and sewer for Unincorporated at Santa Maria Valley. Our costs of course are higher than the city of Santa Maria and Guadalupe, but also my understanding that our level of treatment is significantly higher. And as the water quality regulations continue to tighten down we really have a facility that's going to be able to adjust to those regulations. Would you agree with that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:30:54

Chair Williams, Director Nielsen, very much so. Regulations increase, costs increase for treating it to that level and it's not going to change, it's only going to grow.

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:31:03

Right and so we're already at that level that we're gonna be able to anticipate some of those future regulations you'd say ahead of the game?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:31:10

Definitely. The current level of treatment is tertiary disinfected plus advanced treatment using reverse osmosis to reduce salt content. There is some drive in the industry to go towards indirect potable reuse, the state is really trying to push and incentivize agencies statewide to do that as well. We are poised to move in that direction based on the level of treatment we were already at.

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:31:31

And so the City of Santa Maria and Guadalupe, some of our peers up here in the Valley would have to make some significant investments to be able to move those directions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:31:38

Thank you. Chair Williams, Director Nielsen, that is true. Those two agencies treat to secondary levels and the state is amping it up if you will for levels of treatment particularly for nitrogen. I understand that the state is adopting a general order for all waste discharge permit holders which are those who don't discharge We are already

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:32:10

there. I get a lot of comments from the public concerned about the slide before this where it talks about City of Santa Maria's sewer charges being in the 20s and we're in the 90s so they see that big difference but I don't think they fully understand I know when people come to complain to my office, I just provide them your number out there. And you often give them a tour and then they quickly understand what the investment is about I do want to point out that the increase is one and a half percent.

That's potentially a 6% reduction if you think about those terms. Always want to be cautious about raising fees, something I often vote against but at the same time we need to make sure that we're maintaining these facilities and the cost to operate them continue to go up. And I really want to thank you and appreciate the modest increase that didn't ask for any more than was really needed to continue on the funding plan that exists out there. I think this is an example of good fiscal management and it's something I'm proud to support today.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:33:41

Any other

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:33:41

comments

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:33:42

or questions from the board? If I could follow with that, Chair Williams and Director Nelson. Several years ago or a handful of years ago we did undergo significant rate increases to pay for the current upgrade anywhere from 6% to 12%. That was used to build up a reserve account and be able to afford debt service for the current upgrade which has replaced a 60-year old plant so yeah we are modernizing and trying to stay ahead of the game.

Thank you

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:34:11

Other questions from the board? Public comment?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:34:15

Chair Williams and members of the Board, we have no request to speak.

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction2:34:19

Chair, with that I'll be happy to make a motion to approve staff recommendation.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:34:25

There is motion. Is there a second? There's a motion and a second roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion and a second roll call
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson. Aye. Supervisor Labanino. Aye Supervisor Hartman. Aye Supervisor Kaps. Aye And Chair Williams. Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:34:41

Motion passes unanimously.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:34:42

Apartmental item number five

2:34 – 2:3712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:34:49

Chair Williams and members of the board, we do have a presentation for this item but we can also just skip to the recommendations if you would like. It's a short presentation um and just want to take a minute to thank your board for your contributions to CSA 12 area uh recently with project oh I'm sorry

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:35:11

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number five is from the Public Works Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the County Service Area 12 Mission Canyon Sewer District resolution relative to the collection of sewer service charges and sewer connection charges on the tax roll. This project is located within the first district.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:35:31

Chair Williams all that stuff I just said we do have a presentation or we can skip to the recommendations it's up to your board

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:35:40

Maybe just a brief. Chair

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:35:51

Williams, members of the Board of Supervisors, this is the annual recommendation to set rates for sewer charges for next fiscal year for Mission Canyon County Service Area 12. Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board. I'm going to turn it back over to the Board of Supervisors. The southern area in the CSA 12 boundary shown in green is where we have sewer systems that were required by the regional water board in 1983. The northern area remains on septic and monitored by the county health department. Currently there's 873 residential units connected to the sewer system, 804 parcels.

It should be pointed out Wastewater is transmitted through the City of Santa Barbara collection system and to the city L sterile treatment plant for disposal under a joint powers agreement. The county assesses the CSA 12 costs on the tax roll. The sewer rate is proposed to remain at the same, at $316.83 per year with no charge for last year or for the last several years for that matter. In addition, the City of Santa Barbara bills for their city sewer services on the city water bill.

The reserve balance is approximately 1.8 million dollars and it's considered satisfactory And therefore, staff recommends to the board that they adopt the resolution establishing the service charges for next fiscal year and collection on the tax roll.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:37:21

Any questions from the board? Any public comment?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:37:27

Chair Williams and members of the board, we have no requests to speak.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:37:31

Then motion. Yes, my district I'll move, I'll move the recommendation.

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.842:37:38

I'll second.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:37:40

Roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move the recommendation. I'll second. Roll call
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? Aye. Supervisor Labanino? Aye Supervisor Hartman? Aye Supervisor Caps? Aye And Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:37:51

Motion passes unanimously

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:37:53

Thank you Let's go to departmental item number six

2:37 – 2:428 turns

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:37:59

Chair Williams and members of the board, departmental item number six is from the Public Works Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding establishing benefits assessments for County Service Areas 3-31 and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:38:22

Chair Williams, members of the Board of Supervisors. This action is setting annual benefit assessment rates where they exist for the street lighting districts and county service areas that do have benefit assessments. In the Goleta Valley we have County Service Area 3 created in 1963 which provides for street lighting for unincorporated Goleta and unincorporated Santa Barbara. It also provides open space and park maintenance improvements as well as median entry trimming maintenance improvements The benefit assessment funds street lighting operation and maintenance, whereas property tax revenue funds any other street lighting costs that exceed the benefit assessment. Median open space maintenance improvements, additional street tree trimming around typically street lights and overhead wires etc., and park related equipment purchases and activities.

The proposed benefit assessment for CSA 3 is proposed to be unchanged from last year with a base rate of $24 per year, base rate meaning per residential unit equivalent and factors for various types of businesses. And the fund balance is considered acceptable. Isla Vista has County Service Area 31 also created in 1963 and provides for the street lighting in Isla Vista as well as streetscape and landscape installation maintenance.

Street lighting benefit assessment and property tax fund street lighting services. Property tax revenues also fund the other services such as hardscape and landscape improvements. The proposed benefit assessment is suggested to stay unchanged from last year with a base rate of $12.93 per year, and the fund balance is also considered acceptable. The North County Lighting District was created in 1994 and provides street lighting to the communities of Orcutt, actually Zones. Orcutts Zone, Los Alamos, Cazamelia, Unincorporated Lompoc, and Unincorporated Santa Maria.

This power only is for street lighting And in the unincorporated Santa Maria zone, what was the old CSA 5 boundary, a benefit assessment rate does exist of up to 1473 per residential unit equivalent that can be considered for adoption as well as certain tracts in the Santa Maria and Lompoc area that have zone-specific or tract-specific benefit assessments. Currently, there is sufficient revenue strictly from property taxes to pay for all the street lighting costs and therefore the benefit assessments that could be utilized are proposed to remain at zero. And currently the fund balance is also acceptable.

Recommendation from staff is to adopt the resolutions establishing the benefit assessments for CSA 3 and CSA 31 and to not establish benefit assessments in their North County Lighting District

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:41:30

Questions from the board. Is there any public comment?

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:41:35

Sir Williams and members of the board, we have no request to

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:41:37

speak. Deliberation or emotion.

ElectedLaura CappsSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.902:41:44

Well, I will move to accept separate part and with gratitude especially for the dedication of more lighting in Isla Vista from this fund. So thanks for finding those funds and keeping more students and young people in residence by La Vista safe.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:42:01

There's a motion, is there a second? Second. And roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion, is there a second? Second. And roll call
Show transcript
Supervisor Nelson? Aye. Supervisor Labadino? Aye. Supervisor Hartman? Aye Supervisor Katz? Aye Chair Williams? Aye
UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role2:42:14

Motion passes unanimously

2:42 – 2:436 turns

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:42:18

We will now recess to closed session but before we do I'd like to remind the public that the board will be attending the Hope Village groundbreaking at noon right across the street from the Better AAPI Government Complex here in Santa Maria Will County Council please read the items for consideration today?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:42:36

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The board has two items for closed session. The first is public employee performance evaluation for County Council and the second is conference with labor negotiators, employee organization Santa Barbara County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the agency designated representatives are CEO Miyasato and Human Resources Director Maria Elena de Rivera

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:43:00

Then we will reconvene at 125.

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.892:43:06

Supervisor Williams, when will closed session start?

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.922:43:12

Can we take one item before the groundbreaking? So 1230. 1230, Supervisor Hartman, 1230

ElectedJoan HartmannSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.892:43:24

Thank you.

5:14 – 5:156 turns

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction5:14:24

We

ElectedSteve LavagninoSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.845:14:24

promise she's

PresenterAshley WatkinsProposed · by introduction5:14:26

welcome.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.925:14:50

We're reconvening this meeting of the Board of Supervisors to report out from closed session.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed5:14:55

Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board. The board met in closed session on two items public employee performance evaluation for county council and confidence with labor negotiators for Santa Barbara County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the board took no reportable action.

ElectedBob NelsonSupervisorProposedvoiceprint 0.925:15:10

And we will adjourn to Tuesday May 16th in Santa Barbara. Thank you so much.