UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:0610 turns
Very good example for our students who are here with us today of quietly starting. I'm pleased to call to order this meeting of February 27th, 2024, of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. As you can tell, I am not Chair Lavagnino. He is on official business in Washington D.C., with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments so I will be acting chair today as vice-chair. With that, Madam Clerk, will you please call the
Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
today.
Thank you.
The next item of business is to approve the minutes from the February 13, 2004, 2024 meeting. I need a motion for that please.
So moved.
Roll-call vote Moved by Joan Hartmann · Seconded by Bob Nelson
Show transcript
Good morning Madam Chair and Board Members. This morning I'm pleased to share with you another video of our series Your County, Your Heroes as you know it features unsung heroes throughout the county who embody the spirit of selflessness and dedication. The videos in this series are played on channel 20 throughout the week are highlighted in our monthly county newsletter on CSB TV's YouTube page on our social media Channels in both English and Spanish. This morning we're proud to feature a 28-year employee, Scott Perkins of the Weights & Measures Inspector from the Ag Commissioner's Office. So if we could dim the lights please and show the video.
Welcome to Santa Barbara County where extraordinary individuals shine bright. Join us as we celebrate the unsung heroes who embody the spirit of selflessness and dedication from tireless volunteers to dedicated public servants these remarkable individuals who inspire us all Your county, your heroes.
I'm Scott Perkins and i work for Santa Barbara County Ag Commissioner's Office and I'm a Weights & Measures Inspector. I inspect devices that things are weighed off of or things are measured off of. Weights and measures is important because we're the impartial observer in the middle between a financial transaction so we're making sure that the consumer is not being shorted or that the business is not I'm wanting to make sure that when it says five gallons, that I have five gallons on my prover. And I'm making sure that that corresponds with the 5.079 that they're
selling the fuel at. Scott's an unsung hero because he cares about his community. It's important that things are done in a fair and equitable way, and then also from business-to-business that there's a level playing field. So everybody's held to the same standard and then also that consumers have confidence when they're shopping in the marketplace. He's just a perfect fit for our division.
One of my favorite things to do is doing the livestock scales and the vineyard scales. We get to go out onto our beautiful cattle ranches here in Santa Barbara County, and we get to work hand-in-hand with the cattle rancher to make sure that his scale that he sells his livestock off of is accurate Their whole livelihood is based off of those scale indications, so accuracy of that. And most of our wineries and vineyards they have a two to 5000 pound scale that we certify and make sure it's accurate because there's a large monetary value to the product that goes over these scales. We are going to check the net contents of packages. We do what's called a package inspection So even something just like this product here, we're going to weigh it and we're going to make sure that the net quantity statement on the package is accurate.
We're gonna go ahead and we're gonna test a register scale here. We'll put the lightest weight and then we'll work our way up and as we're doing it we're checking to make sure that the scale's maintaining its accuracy. Now I'm at my five pounds. Go to 10, checking for accuracy. That's where we'll then put our seal onto the scale. We place those seals on devices that we have tested that meet the specifications and tolerances and that seal is put on there Consumer know that, that device has been tested and found to be correct at the time of inspection. Everything that we do has to be done precisely. We're providing a service to the community. We're making sure that there's price accuracy so for when that young mother goes into the grocery store to buy her baby formula, we're making sure that it's priced correctly.
I consider it very important work, and it's very rewarding to be able to see an impact of your work and to see that there is a difference made.
0:06 – 0:0816 turns
Scott, if you could stand up and be recognized. Thank you everyone. You don't have to come to the podium but thank you. That concludes the CEO's report.
And thank you to our CEO and your office for these videos I always learn important information, I'm inspired and thank you Mr. Perkins for your diligent work. Okay
the next item of business is the administrative agenda would any board members like to pull actually I'm sorry I skipped over something already Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Capps and members of the board, I have a couple quick announcements this morning. We posted an addendum to the agenda on Friday February 23rd to add administrative item number 19 to the agenda. Administrative item number 19 is from the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding an update from the Public Health Department on the Goleta Beach closure due to sewage spill. This addendum has been posted and made available to the Board and the public and can be added to the balance of the administrative agenda Lastly, for the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda. Please see page two of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2.
If you have any questions please contact the clerk at the board's office at area code 805-568-2240 again that number is 805 5 6 8 2 2 4 0 and that concludes my announcements for today.
Thank you so now we will dive into that administrative agenda would any board members like to pull any items from the admin agenda?
A3 and A19.
Excellent, Madam Clerk do any members of the public request to pull any items on the administrative agenda?
Chair Kaps and members of the board we have one request to speak from the public on A19
A3, A9 and A19. I will now entertain a motion to approve the balance of administrative agenda except for A3 ,A9 and A19
So moved.
Second. Next item of business are the resolutions to be presented
Do we need to get a vote on
that?
Chair Capson, members of the board yes. If we could just get a verbal vote on that.
All those in favor please say aye. Aye.
Great thank you.
0:08 – 0:153 turns
Thank you. Okay resolution to be presented administrative item number one.
Chair Katz and members of the board, Administrative Item number one is sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It is to adopt a resolution in support of the struggle of Amara people of Ethiopia and joining us in person today we have Circadus Gobezi, Zadanesh Taghi, Sian Ashmama, Yengas Yigza, Yodit Wabshet, Bethy Mulugeta, Al-Miu And if you can please join us at the podium.
And anyone I might have missed can also join you and I will go ahead and read the resolution into the record. Whereas the war in Ethiopia's Amara region is claiming countless lives, endangering civilians and challenging peace, pluralism and human rights. And whereas the Amara people are indigenous to Ethiopia, are one of the largest ethnic groups in the country and have a rich culture and history that is intertwined into the fabric of Ethiopia.
And whereas a large number of Amara civilians many of whom were unarmed women, children and elderly people Were killed or injured through the use of drone strikes, heavy artillery shelling and other weapons of war by government security forces since April 2023. And whereas government security forces and other violent armed groups have perpetrated acts of sexual and gender based violence on Amara women and girls.
And whereas the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and the UN Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide have issued an active genocide alert for Ethiopia's Amara region due to ongoing killings of Amara civilians by federal forces, the Aroma Liberation Army and Omiya region security forces. And whereas the European Center for Law and Justice, ECLJ also reported that the human rights violations range from forced displacement and mass arrests to systemic massacres and ethnic cleansings. The Economist reported that abductions and killings are rampant across the nation. And whereas the United Nation World Food Program affirmed the use of starvation as a weapon and that chronic food insecurity is prevalent in the Amara region in recent years.
And whereas since spring of 2022, Ethiopia's ruling Oromo Prosperity Party has arrested thousands of Amara civilians including parliamentarians, opposition figures, journalists, civil society leaders and other citizens who have faced torture, arbitrary detainment And whereas the county of Santa Barbara encourages continued efforts of the Biden administration to respond to ethnic violence and tensions in Ethiopia, including declining To reinstate Ethiopia's participation as a beneficiary in the AGOA until progress is made towards a peaceful settlement of the conflict and conditions allow for the smooth flow of humanitarian aid. Now, therefore it is hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors affirms its support for the Amara people passed and adopted today.
Limit Sana Barbara. My hummingbird nest, my enigma, my home away from home, my sublime. For the last 50 years I felt my silence enable oppression, discrimination, racism and violence against the Amara people of Ethiopia. We as Amara people are still too slow in speaking out against oppression, discrimination, racism and violence against us even today. Our silence allowed the cycle of oppression, discrimination, racism, violence to continue.
Although our silence did not directly cause the death of the Amara people over the last 50 years, our silence did nothing to stop our death either. It is overdue for us, for our silence to end. It is overdue for us to speak out. It is overdue for us to raise our voice. I want to end our silence and raise our voice and say what is happening to the Amara people in Ethiopia is unacceptable.
I am ending my silence and raising my voice. And say, I will not allow oppression, discrimination, racism and violence to continue. I am asking the good citizens of Santa Barbara County to join me in saying we will end the silence and raise our voice and say no one is free when others are encountering racism. No one is free when others are encountering oppression. No one is free when others are encountering discrimination. And definitely no one is free when others are encountering violence.
Let's end the silence together and raise our voice and say we are truly friends of all who are victimized and oppressed. And that we will stand together to make a right. In the words of Martin Luther King, in the end, we will not remember the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends. I want to thank you all for setting the cornerstone to speak on behalf of Santa Barbara County What's happening to my people and me is no longer a matter of being kept secret.
Thank you, County Supervisor Das William for giving me the opportunity to stop my silence and to be the voice for the voiceless. Thank you. Thank you all.
0:15 – 0:222 turns
Good morning. Forgive us, we're a bit emotional. It's very difficult to stand in front of you and see what we're about to say. First I want to say thank you. Thank you Supervisor Williams. Thank you Chair. Thank you Board of Members of the board for bringing this crucial resolution. We members of the Amara community in Santa Barbara and Amara Association of Los Angeles greatly appreciate and want to express our deepest gratitude for your resolution in support of the Amara people in Ethiopia against an existential threat.
Since the establishment of an ethnic apartheid system of government over three decades ago, a war has been waged on the Amara people in Ethiopia openly designated as Naftanya Enemies of the other Ethiopian ethnic groups, the Amaras have been denied the right to protect themselves, selectively disarmed and made vulnerable to attack. Amaras have been mass sterilized, forcefully displaced, their property destroyed, massacred, buried in mass graves.
They've been thrown over cliffs, burned alive and even subject to cannibalism. University students, mostly girls, they were kidnapped by the terrorist or homo extremist groups and to this date no one knows where they're abouts. The ethnic cleansing and genocide has especially been intensified since Abiy Ahmed took office five years ago. Millions displaced, thousands killed.
Mass arrests is prevalent and recent leaked pictures show the horrific situation of Amara youth in concentration camps. Excuse me. Since April 2023, a state of emergency has been declared in the Amara region and large number of Amara civilians Many of whom were unarmed women, children and elderly people killed or injured through the use of drones, heavy artillery shelling and other weapons of war by government security forces.
These forces and other Oromo extremist armed groups, the Oromo Special Forces, OLF or LA armed groups have perpetrated ethnically motivated targeted and organized gruesome mass killings looting burning of victim homes. Acts of sexual and gender-based violence, gang rapes on Amara women and girls are used as a strategic systematic calculated tool for ethnic cleansing and genocide.
For many years now the war on Amara largely ignored by international community is claiming countless lives, endangering civilians, destroying basic infrastructure like hospitals and schools in the Amara region. Challenging peace human rights in the Horn of Africa. Therefore today April 27 2024 is historic day for us the Amara people The resolution in support of the struggle of the Amhara people in Ethiopia, issued by the County of Santa Barbara has changed the course or history of this ancient people.
A message is sent by the County of Santa Barbara loud and clear. The Amhara people are not forgotten and we matter. Thank you for sharing. Thank you for supporting us Thank you for standing against Samara genocide. Thank you for your support to end ethnic violence, thank you very much.
Supervisor Das William. Chair and esteemed member of the board, I want to extend my sincere appreciation for the opportunity to address you today. And thank God for being here today. Your support and resolution in favor of Yamara people mean more to us than words can express. Today as we stand here alive and well, we carry the heavy burden of uncertainty about the fate of our relatives in the Amara region.
The experience my sister shared here today paint a harrowing pictures of the atrocity occurring here. It is a relief to finally have a chance to be heard and to bring attention to the flight of our loved ones We come before you, not just as speakers but the voice of those who cannot be here. Those who may be clinging to the hope of survival or tragically those who may no longer be with us.
The Amhara people are facing unimaginable challenges and our hearts ache for the countless lives hanging in the balance. It is not just a distance crisis It's really happening. The reality has torn apart families and left us grappling with the unknown. For many of us, the situation hits home. The school we helped establish is now a military base camp under Abiy regime.
And the tragic loss of Avata Masfuna Barra Brother of one of our directors who was tragically among the hundreds killed in Marawi, leaving behind five children. Let our collective plea be a catalyst for tangible action whether it be a form of humanitarian aid, a diplomatic intervention or any means available to end the suffering of the Amara people. We are here not only witness to tragedy, but as advocates to change. And we humbly request your unwavering support in this dire time.
Thank you for the opportunity.
0:22 – 0:288 turns
Good morning. Please allow me to say the resolution in Amharic. I'm Good news. I would like to thank all of you for your hard work. You have helped millions of Amharic people in many ways. We are very grateful for your support. I would like to thank all the members of the Board of Supervisors, members of parliamentarians and members of the media for their participation in this meeting. I would also like to thank all the participants who participated in this meeting.
Yalem has The board of Supervisors meeting will be held at 5 p.m. to discuss issues related to the U.S. and other countries. you. Thank you.
Thank you very much to all of you. Supervisor Williams.
Thank you so much for being here, for having the courage to come forward and request the resolution. And I think it's just important that we though we have no informal power that we encourage our federal government to take constructive actions and to provide our own residents with an opportunity to awaken the conscience of the world. Thank you so much.
Thank you and our clerk has an announcement.
Thank you Chair Caps and members of the board for members of the public who are joining us via zoom today unfortunately we are having a few technical difficulties and when you are registering that you are missing a couple fields requesting which items you would like to speak on today so The Office of the Clerk of the Board is reaching out to you via email, asking which items you would like to speak on. I see we did receive a few but if any member that is watching via Zoom now and you haven't reached out to my office to let us know which item you would like to speak on, if you can please call our office and let them know. That is number area code 805-568-2240 again that number is 805 5682240 and my apologies for that technical glitch. It should be repaired as of now, but any previous registration was missing a couple fields.
Thank you.
Thank you. Now we will take up the three administrative items that were pulled and we'll do so in numerical order. So Madam Clerk, please read administrative item number 3 into the record.
Chair Caps and members of the board, we have one more resolution to be presented
this morning. Oh I skipped over the one I was super excited about! Excuse me. Okay that would be administrative item number 2. Thank you.
0:28 – 0:332 turns
Great, Chair Caps and members of the board administrative item number two is sponsored by Supervisor Caps it is to adopt a resolution recognizing February 2024 as National Children's Dental Health Month in Santa Barbara County and we have joining us here in person today from the Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics Dr. Mandi Ashrafian the CEO of Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics and Dr. Queen Nguyen Chief Dental Director of Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics From Santa Barbara Unified School District we have Dr. Hilda Maldonado, Santa Barbara Unified Superintendent Ed Zucchelli, Comms Veronica Binkley Harding Principal and Karen Reyes Harding Family Engagement Liaison and we do have a few students joining us today from the Santa Barbara Unified School District Emiliana Ortega Paulina Tarablanca and Yaseline Pantoja and I will go ahead and read the resolution Whereas the well-being of our nation's children is of paramount importance, and whereas oral health significantly contributes to the overall health and development of children influencing their capacity to thrive and realize their full potential.
And whereas tooth decay continues to be a prevalent chronic ailment among children impacting their eating speaking and concentration in school thereby impeding academic and social success. And whereas disparities in access to dental care persists disproportionately affecting vulnerable and underserved populations, compounding the challenges faced by children and achieving optimal oral health. And whereas in 2023, the Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics SBNC introduced a groundbreaking enhancement To its Pediatric Dental Services, a mobile dental clinic made possible by $100,000 grant from the Women's Fund of Santa Barbara. The clinic now serves 200 to 400 children weekly and whereas children at all schools in the Santa Barbara Unified School District and the Carpinteria Children's Project are eligible for free screenings and oral health education from SBNC.
And now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that Santa Barbara County recognizes and celebrates as National Children's Dental Health Month and encourages schools, healthcare providers, families and community organizations to participate in activities and events that promote oral health education and awareness for children passed and adopted today.
Thank you very much, good morning everyone. I am the proud superintendent of Santa Barbara Unified School District, Hilda Maldonado accompanied here by our wonderful principal, our family liaison Karen Reyes and of course our wonderful students. I want to thank Supervisor Capps and the supervisors for this recognition, of course my partner Dr. Madi Ashrafian and Dr. Nguyen who's been helping us with this project in this endeavor all around I do want the Board of Supervisors to know how important this issue is to me. As a child immigrant myself, I did not have access to dental care until I went to middle school and that was because my parents had factory jobs and hourly pay and in order for them to take us six children to get dental care they needed to take two buses across town and that takes a lot of time plus waiting in the dental office and all of the time that that takes It wasn't until our neighbor's daughter got a job at a dental office that they learned about the access to free dental care, that we could actually go and begin to get that care.
So this is both personal and professionally important issue to me. I know it is to you as well. I know that our county has large poverty rate when it comes to students and families. And so it's really important for when we started to think about this partnership, it was an obvious choice to say yes to the Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics We have the children six hours a day if they stay after school, maybe even eight hours a day. So why not partner and have them come to us instead? So I'm very excited about this partnership. I'm very honored and proud to be working with the Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics As was said in the resolution, healthy living includes having a healthy mouth and often that is the first time you can also detect other illnesses.
We want our students to be healthy when they come to school we want them to thrive and learn. The mobile clinic moves around our schools it is currently serving between 2-400 children a week in our community As you know, we serve 12,000 students just in the South County alone. Through this work we've had students get screenings received seals and a few have even had to get additional work done in Oxnard because of very bad tooth decay.
And again, this would not be possible without this partnership. Of course as a superintendent that gets to speak in front of you I'm going to have an ask and I would like to have us think about galvanizing our resources and think about a vision van next. Getting vision vans to our schools will also help with eye care but that's for another day. Anyway healthy bodies equals healthy learners. I'd now like to bring up Principal Veronica Binkley from Harding Elementary School.
0:33 – 0:389 turns
Thank you for that nice introduction. Hello everyone. Harding University Partnership School began a pilot with the Santa Barbara Neighborhood Clinics three years ago. They have provided oral health education, dental disease identification and treatment services to all of our students. They act, they connect families also with a range of treatment services. I want to talk about something that happened even before that several years ago a Harding student had severe severe tooth decay so much so that she wasn't sleeping she couldn't concentrate she was missing a lot of school Working with her family, I was able to take them to the Eastside Neighborhood Clinic where they determined that her tooth decay required a pediatric specialist.
The Eastside Neighborhood Clinic provided a grant. They recommended a wonderful pediatric dentist in Goleta and she was treated and was able to continue her learning journey so you can imagine how relieved and how important this was to us to get this partnership going It has been nothing short of amazing. With a consistently energetic team of dental specialists who annually screen over 350 students, they provide varnish to those in need and in some extreme cases refer out to more comprehensive treatment centers.
They have been professional, organized, adaptive and resourceful. They are bilingual, interactive and very kid-friendly. They make the trip to the dentist seem not so scary. I have some lovely students here, we have Paulina Tierra Blanca from 6th grade, Yaseline Pantoja from 4th grade and Emiliano Ortega if anybody would like to ask them questions about their experience?
They're willing to be brave and speak.
So maybe you can, does anyone want to tell us if it's still scary to go to the dentist or is it OK that there's a mobile van coming to your school for help? If you want to speak, you don't have to.
I'm not scared to go to the dentist anymore.
Smile real big. Look at that smile. Thank you. Anyone want to say anything? Yeah, go. Emiliano say what you thought. You can just say it was fun.
Going to the going to the dentist is fun.
Wonderful.
Going to the dentist not scared.
Good job. Well thank you so much. It takes a strong community to help our children thrive and learn, and we clearly have that. I love the neighborhood clinics. Did you want to say something?
So hello everyone before everything I would like to use this opportunity to thank all the supervisors for clinic for supporting neighborhood clinics and in particular supervisor caps for inviting a recognizing SPNC for what we do for this community. This whole idea of school based mobile clinic It came from the realization that many of our students are missing out on critical care because they cannot make it to our clinics for various reasons.
It could be that their parents are busy with work Like all of us and as Hilda just mentioned, or they might have very important school assignments that they will be missing out if they leave the school. But these students are our future generation and we need to invest into our future to keep them healthy. So we decided to remove the barriers and take care directly to them.
I want to express my sincere gratitude to Santa Barbara Unified School District and particularly Hilda Maldonado for her support. She and her team made it possible for us to work together, to make our students healthier. In fact we have actually expanded this collaboration to include medical mobile unit and medical care as well and we are very proud of that.
We could not have accomplished this without her support. We are hoping to be able to have similar arrangements and collaborations with other school districts such as Goleta, Hope and Carpinteria. Finally I would like to recognize the great work that our Dental Officer Dr. Wen And at this point I would like to pass the torch to Dr. Ren.
0:38 – 0:453 turns
I would like to echo my CEO Dr. Shafian to thank Supervisor Laura Capps and the Board of Supervisors for this honor, and also I'd like to thank Dr. Hilda Madden Mother Hondo, and also Principal Veronica Bingley. You have started with us on this journey and actually you, Harding School was the seed of where this whole thing blossomed so thank you for having the vision and foresight and also putting up with us in the beginning with all our problems, technical problems Anyway, I would like to also just let you know that since the start of this school year we have visited 15 schools and we have screened 1,477 students so far and will continue.
I just want to also share a quick story with you of a child I met last week. When I saw her, you know, I've seen a lot in my 36 years of being a dentist but I was still taken aback She was looking into her mouth. And then so I told my manager of the outreach program, Martine, to make sure that we see her immediately. So she was scheduled and at the very first appointment after the screening, we sat down and again, I looked in her mouth and I thought to myself you know, I don't think she even So I was you know trying to figure out a way to approach her because right away. I saw her defense mechanism, you know going up and And she's only, she was only 10 but she already have a teenager attitude.
She started rolling her eyes and she knew what was coming so and despite all the training I had about Interviewing, I just said to me the best approach is the direct approach. So I told her what I saw and what was going on and we spent a good half an hour with her showing her how to brush and floss, how to take care of her teeth. And then we asked her to Show us how she would do it herself to make sure she understand.
And she and she did, and she dry brush and she sat in brush and brush and brush and afterwards in the meantime I shared with her my own experience growing up and I ate candy like there was no tomorrow. And so she knows where I was coming from. I'm no different than her. So she wasn't scared of me anymore. Afterwards I gave her a mirror And she looked in her mouth afterwards and I saw that brilliant smile. And she saw that brilliant smile, and I knew that sealed it for me, you know, that our work matters and it mattered to that child. So thank you. Thank you for the recognition.
Thank you, thank you to our I love our neighborhood clinics. I love our schools Harding School when we do right by our children we do right by all of us. I think you can tell that this partnership is doing right and doing good and making kids smile so thanks to everyone for being here okay with that we will now move on to the rest of the three items that were pulled the administrative vendor thank you everyone
Chair Capps and members of the board, administrative item number three is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Williams. It is an honorary resolution to celebrate the completion of the Straus Wind Project, a landmark coastal wind project. And I will go ahead and read that into the record now. Whereas the Straus Wind Project, a pioneering initiative stands as the first utility scale wind project on the California coast that can generate enough clean renewable energy to power approximately 36,000 homes. And whereas this groundbreaking project 3.5 miles southwest of the city of Lompoc in the county of Santa Barbara showcases our county and state's commitment to innovative and sustainability in the renewable energy sector.
And whereas the realization of the Straus Wind Project aligns with the county's commitment to diversify its renewable energy generation profile and meet its renewable energy goals, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future for our state. And whereas the Straus Wind Project was proud to employ skilled union labor and contractors for its construction and is a significant contributor to the tax base in Santa Barbara County. And whereas the approval of utility scale renewable energy projects is critical Climate change and wind energy in particular in a sustainable resource that generates no pollution or hazardous waste, does not deplete freshwater resources and requires no mining transportation or refining of fuel to deliver energy.
Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors celebrates the historic significance as the first wind project on the California coast And it's substantial economic, environmental and community benefits. We celebrate this project as a shining example of our commitment to a sustainable and prosperous future passed and adopted today.
And we do have one request to speak on this item from the public. And we are going to Zoom for Dave Everett.
0:45 – 0:499 turns
Oh, there you go. I think I was on mute there for a moment. Can you guys hear me?
We can hear you. Yes, please proceed.
Excellent. I'm calling with the Western Electrical Contractors Association and I'm calling because this wind project, the resolution makes it sound like it's some sort of environmental accomplishment but they failed to mention some of the CEQA abuse that was part of the process I wanted to point out that the California Unions for Reliable Energy, they abused the CEQA process during this review. And as soon as their project labor was a project labor agreement was signed all these environmental concerns went away. And so I think you can make the observation that it's even written in the resolution that the Strauss Project is proud to employ skilled union labor and contractors for its construction but They themselves filed, I think it's five six different California Environmental Equality Act objections.
October 3rd 2008 Adams Broadwell Josephine Cardoza submitted one on December 2nd 2019 to December 12th 2019 December 23rd 2019 January 20th 2020 And all of those concerns seem to go away the second they signed their union labor agreement, which of course increases the price of the project. But when you talk about this being some kind of environmental accomplishment, if the county wants to brag about some pretend commitment to the environment then follow the California Environmental Quality Act.
Giving the construction work to your political donors does not make environmental concerns go away or magically disappear. So I want to make that point as they pass this proclamation. Thanks so much.
And that concludes public comment on administrative item number three.
Supervisor Hartman?
Thank you Madam Chair. On Thursday, Supervisor Williams and I will be out on the site to celebrate the start of this that was a two decade long process to bring this to fruition. There have been environmental and cultural issues along the way. been pretty well addressed. I had the opportunity to be on site and see a 360 degree camera that tracks birds and learns about different kinds of birds and flocks and can actually slow the turbines down depending on the kind of birds and bird blocks that are approaching. So I think we're learning a great deal, and I think wind energy is far superior to oil so I'm very excited about this.
Thank you, I'll be joining you there as well on Thursday for the celebration. Madam Clerk, I believe on this one we need a vote since it was pulled. Supervisor Williams?
Well I just wanted to, like the speaker I wish it was easier to produce renewable energy along the coast. But you know it is difficult being the first and for a long time the regulatory structures of coastal counties have made it Fairly prohibitive to do utility scale renewable energy and navigating that. Colleague Supervisor Hartman did this as well. What our role really was often trying to be peacemakers, to make this project happen and in the end the different parties largely reached accord and moved forward and that is to be commended Hopefully it sends the signal that coastal California can be part of the solution because it's really clear that we can't sit this one out and expect inland counties to do all the renewable energy to save our climate and our planet.
We need to be a part of the solution.
Move approval. Thank you for that. Do I have a second? Okay, we can just have a voice vote on this one. Sounds good. All in favor? Aye. Motion passes. Okay now Madam Clerk please read an administrative item number nine into the record
0:49 – 0:546 turns
Chair caps and members of the board administrative item number nine is from the county executive office. It is to consider recommendations regarding the fiscal year 2023 through 2024 second quarter budget status report
Supervisor Nielsen I believe you pulled this, would you like to speak? I did
yes. Okay thank you Chair Caps. I'm only pulling it just to make some comments and then hopefully move along. The point of interest that I wanted the public to pay attention to was attachment c which is funded vacancies in the county. I want to make sure I dispelled some of the narratives out there and inaccuracies about county employment There's some recent op-eds that were talking about the county's largesse and the growth of government services and pay throughout our community.
I think this is evidence that despite having many positions that are funded through tax dollars because we deliver a lot of programs from state and federal government, that we actually have quite a hard time filling these positions. Right now in the county we have 600 open Funded but unfilled positions out of 4,600 employees. That's a significant percentage of our organization and I want to be clear these are these are positions that are already paid for by taxpayer dollars and frankly these services are not being rendered to the taxpayers because we are not able to fill those positions So I want the public to be able to think about that, draw their own conclusions based on that information. I do think it is alarming.
I think as a board we need to be thinking about in the future how do we get more efficient? We definitely have a place that's very expensive to live and many of the jobs in county government are becoming much more technical Look at, for example our IT department is the positions that need to be filled. It's hard to attract competitive labor in the market that we have for those skill sets so um for those that pay attention to county government and want to kind of get involved in understanding how what we do up here works this is a great sheet for you guys to kind of draw some conclusions on about what's going on with the decisions we have to make as a board That was the first reason I wanted to point this out. The second is you know if any of you have family or friends who are looking for jobs and employment, again 600 positions open countywide at this point so it's significant.
One of the other points I want to point out here is we talk about funding public safety And that's one of the highest priorities of any politician out there, not just during election time. But we have 107 open positions in our Sheriff's Department. I know not all those are law enforcement positions some of those are clerical and administrative but that's a significant challenge in delivering public safety to our community something that I hope to see more traction on from one quarter to the next. We actually only improved that by two and a half positions so it's quite alarming. There are some concerns out there as an organization as we move forward into these coming years And I think and I want to appreciate, or I want to thank the CEO's office for including this attachment in this quarter update because I think it is a you know it's something that we should all be aware of as a public and as a board and as organization as we pursue into future years.
So I'm happy to make a motion to approve this item. I just wanted to make sure I made some comments about
it. Supervisor Hartman? say thank you for pulling that and you can go to our county website and see all the positions that are available. I was promoting that in a talk with students last night, uh, and I noticed that we have a difference in our agenda for the A items. We actually list the attachments in the board letter and that's really helpful. I like that. Thank you.
Thank you. Are there any members of public on this one? Chair Caps and members of the board, we have no request to speak from the public on administrative item number nine
Okay, well we have a motion on the table by Supervisor Nelson. We need a second. Seconded by Hartman. Voice vote here all those in favor? Aye. Aye. Motion passes. Resolution passed. Administrative item passes excuse me. Okay Madam Clerk this is an item that I asked for on the agenda. Administrative Item number 19 may you please read it into the record
0:54 – 1:024 turns
Chair Capps and members of the board. Administrative item number 19 is from the County Executive Office, it is to consider recommendations regarding an update from the Public Health Department on the Goleta Beach closure due to sewage spill. And please note in addition to the board members who have pulled this item we do have three requests to speak from the public on this item.
Thank you and like I this spill happened in my district and I was able to be out there at the Sanitation Department and have many conversations over the last couple days with Our director of public health and I wanted to make sure that the public and my colleagues heard this information. So thank you, Director Hamami for providing an update and we'll have questions for you. Thank you.
Good morning, Madam Chair, Supervisors and thank you for the opportunity to provide you this update. Currently as of Wednesday of last week, the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department has issued a beach closed notice for the Goleta Beach from one mile east to half a mile west of the Goleta Slough outfall due to sewage spill that was reported by the Goleta West Sanitary District due to damage of the forced main sewer line near the airport. The Goleta Beach shoreline is currently closed for all recreational water contact. We are warning the public to avoid entering the water for water activities such as swimming and surfing. It is noteworthy that this comes after another advisory that was issued last Friday passed the storms for all our beaches so this is something that was already in effect The use of the county park for picnics and other recreational activities that are not involving the water is still open for the public and will remain open as of now.
The affected area of the shoreline has been posted with red signs, we have a sample of that and thank you Supervisor Capps and the feedback that you provided and your office We were able Friday to go and post extra signs with some construction tape. We currently have 28 signs at the beach. We issue these warnings because contact with the sewage contaminated water would increase the risk of certain types of gastrointestinal illnesses, rashes and some vulnerability for infections I have with me are Director of Environmental Health and our Chief of Regulatory Division, Lars Sievert who can provide the timeline of what happened since we were notified and what comes next.
Good afternoon chair. Good morning. I actually chair caps and members of the board again this is just for the public's awareness these are the signs that are posted at the Glita Beach warning people not to go into the water until we've had a chance to do the sampling necessary to make sure that it's safe for surfing swimming and other water contact For a brief background, the State Water Board does provide grant funds to Environmental Health Services to test ocean at our public beaches. About 16 of them year-round including Goleta Beach and so we do that weekly testing and then we will advise the public if there are increases in fecal bacteria that are present and warm people when it's not advisable to swim or surf.
The department also will issue as Dr. Hamami mentioned general rain advisories reminding the public that during and after any significant rain event there's always an increased likelihood of debris and logs, harmful bacteria and other contaminants that can wash off through storm drains, creeks heavy creek flows and out to the ocean so during those heavy rain events Warn people not to go into the ocean because there's an increased risk of illness and hazards in the ocean waters. And that we advise people to not go into the water for at least three days following those rain events Thirdly, we also do follow-up on reported sewage spills. If there is a sewage spill that has the ability or the potential to reach ocean beaches, Environmental Health Services will issue, will post closure signs such as what I have here today and basically then we will proceed with doing ocean water testing to check to see if that fecal bacteria was impacting the ocean and continue to do that testing until we can deem it safe for people to reenter the water.
When there are sewage spills, just as a matter of kind of process. State laws do require dischargers such as sewer districts to report those spills both to Cal OES through there's a spill hotline that basically goes to a lot of different agencies including EHS and other state entities that regulate the sewer treatment plants. And we also then ask them to notify Environmental Health directly. We do have a 24-7 spill reporting hotline that they can call us at and on staff, on call personnel to be able to respond to those when reported.
For this particular incident we did receive a first report on Saturday evening the initial report before investigations were conducted by Goleta Sanitary District was that it was 1,000 gallon spill approximately to a grassy area near the runway and then some of that water had entered the Goleta Slough. Due to the location, approximately a mile upstream. The location, the quantity less than 1,000 gallons and the unlikelihood that it would actually reach any of the ocean beaches. A beach notification foreclosure was not warranted at that time.
Subsequently, Goleta West after they did their investigation did update that quantity to about 30,000 gallons on Wednesday. At that point in time we issued a beach closure notification. We posted signs at Goleta Beach and subsequently followed that up with additional public outreach the next day to make sure that the broader public that might be going to Goleta Beach was understanding that this had occurred and that it was basically closed for swimming and surfing at that time.
The Goleta West Sanitary District did further then update that to an estimated 500,000 gallons on Wednesday evening. And then on Friday of last week that had been up to about 1.025 million gallons. So it was a sizable spill. The beach is closed and we do want people to know to avoid the water until we can do the sampling necessary to make sure it's safe. Next steps, Environmental Health Services will continue to collect ocean water samples at Goleta Beach about twice per week based on our laboratory availability and turnaround time for those tests. We'll continue to make sure that fecal bacteria are tested and we will notify and remove signs when bacteria levels are within state health standards.
Fecal bacteria associated with sewage. It will naturally degrade in the ocean, it's unrecoverable when it reaches the ocean there is no way to go in and basically remove sewage but it will dissipate through mixing solar radiation and just a salt water environment so that basically will dissipate over time. We do want to emphasize again that it's not safe to swim or surf at Goleta Beach until we can confirm that water testing indicates that fecal bacteria levels are within state health standards And the public can obtain current beach status by calling a recorded hotline to get just sort of an update of where the status is, and that's at 805-681-4949. So that EHS Beach Hotline number is 805-681-4949. And that concludes our report and available for any questions.
1:02 – 1:1137 turns
Thank you I know my colleagues have questions. I just wanted to ask, I was out and met with Mr. McCarthy who's here from Goleta West Sanitary with two council members from the Goleta City Council, Luz Rey Martinez and James Chiracco and our question is really centered around how this happened. I know sewage spills happen pipes burst but obviously the point now is not to point fingers but to try to figure out exactly what happened so we can prevent this from the future I do before I turn it over to my colleagues for questions and to the public. Can you just spell out a bit more specifically the timeline of this spill happening on a Saturday, and then the beaches not being closed until Thursday? Because that has caused a lot of questions safe to say and angst amongst Our constituents, Goleta Beach as we all know is extremely popular.
It's beloved but not just Goleta by a lot of folks on the south coast so thank you
Yeah, thank you chair Caps and I think that this is a good opportunity to clarify that again. The initial report was on Saturday but it was for 1000 gallon sewage spill to a grassy area near the Goleta Beach Slough. It was not known that that was more significant until later on Wednesday basically we did have conversation with Goleta Sanitary District, those numbers were revised upward and public health then posted notices at the beach due to the increased estimate that occurred during that spill.
But I believe there was an issue with the actual communication and a need for 24-7 live person especially after a storm. I know this apparently wasn't related to the storm but are there steps being taken to remedy that so there's actually a live person because that was one thing we heard from Mr. McCarthy is that there was just a voicemail issue?
Yes, I think that there was a disconnect between what Gleda West Sanitary District had as a contact number for EHS their report to Cal OES did get to us we did get that information on Saturday it to evaluate whether the beach was impacted we have since updated all the sanitary districts with our 24-7 spill hotline that we have that goes to basically an on call staff and a backup As well, so we have that capability. We just wanted to make sure that the sanitary districts and we've done some of that follow up outreach to them to make sure that they have that number that they can reach us directly instead of at our main lane.
Just just to clarify the need for that number did not delay. The delay was that we did not. We were not informed or their report was not disclosed that it's 30,000 until Wednesday. So between Saturday and Wednesday it wasn't that we were notified and we didn't take any action. It wasn't until Wednesday that, that amount warranted the beach closure.
Okay thanks for that clarification on this front did we do any of my colleagues have questions? Advisor Hartman
well I guess the obvious question how did it go from 1,000 to one over one million in a period of five days and i'm not sure that that's I don't know what the county's responsibility is but i'm sure that the regional water board will be trying ferret that out. Thank you.
Yes, I guess my similar question along those lines is so at this point from what we know was that just inaccurate information or was that it was just a problem that was progressing and getting progressively worse or was it reported inaccurately? Can we make any conclusions based on what we know at this time?
Supervisors I don't think our staff can answer that question but maybe the representatives from Goleta West can.
That'd be helpful
Mr. McCarthy would you like to address this question and thank you for being here
Thank You supervisors, can you restate the question?
The question was you know there's a concern up here that it went from 1,000 to 30,000 to 1.25 million gallons over a five-day period Was initial reports inaccurate or was it?
The initial report to OES was incorrectly recorded. The initial report was 30,000 gallons to us that's a huge spill. It was an estimate based on my being there with another guy doing a routine follow-up test inspection of our force mains because we just put it back in service Friday evening Finished in the dark and it was 90% of our forest main is unable to be seen because it's in the vegetated areas.
So we agreed to meet first thing in the morning and do an inspection of the forest main so it was detected around 8 o'clock in the morning and stopped at 830 a.m..
That was Saturday or Sunday? Is that what those days were or is that Wednesday?
Pardon me.
What day of the week were those events that night you're talking
about? Friday night we put the pump station back in service, we'd had some work being done by Tierra Contracting to repair a leak at the pump station so we had a bypass operation in effect. We were anxious to get back into normal operations which was utilizing the pump station and our normal force main. So those were put into service on Friday evening Staff worked late. We agreed to meet in the morning just to check on the situation and immediately detected the spill.
And at
first it
was
a
thousand?
The initial report was 30,000 to OES. There were some other incorrect items on that report. It's a number that you call into I don't want to say anything about the staffing of that line, but they had reported stuff that I know that I did not say. And there were some things that were said that weren't captured in the report. So
did it get progressively worse over the next few days?
Our
or was
it no, it was completed completely stopped at that point at 830 in the morning. There was no more sewage spilling and for the next two days staff and I were a fairly small agency called in resources to deal with the spill as best we could mitigate it as much as possible still investigating the actual cause of this bill but our numbers did go up as we had more information coming
Thank you Mr. McCarthy.
Supervisor Williams?
So you're saying for the two days, for two days the spill was
halted?
From Friday night sometime Friday night until Saturday morning at 830 there was a spill that's the entire flow from West Goleta Valley coming through our force main to the treatment plant So it's a substantial spill. With recent rains, our flows are a little higher than normal. Normal average daily flow is about 1.8 million gallons a day and then I just want to correct it was one point one million twenty five thousand not one point two five million but it's huge number And do
we have any estimate of how much, what percentage of the release is rainwater and what percentage of the release is?
I don't have that information. We can look into it at this point. Once the water's been contaminated, it is wastewater. It's considered sewage. And
just questions for public health. Typically in something of this scale, how long will it take for you know. You know, E. coli and coliform counts to go back to like close to normal at Goleta Beach and how likely considering that volume is it to affect within levels endangering public health farther east since the prevailing current goes towards Hope Ranch, Santa Barbara
I'm not sure that's an easy estimate for us. It depends on the current, it depends on a lot of factors, it depends on the disintegration but just to add that we have been frequently doing water samples. The first one was done on Thursday the 22nd The second one was done on the 26th, which was Monday. It takes 24 hours so we will have the results tomorrow and Wednesday.
And the protocol is once two samples come below what is as the state threshold and it is safe this is when we will reopen the beach. You want to add anything about the like disintegration of something?
1:11 – 1:1911 turns
Yeah, typically it's dependent on flows mixing a lot of other factors that go into that Supervisor Williams. Our initial testing last week did show some elevated E. coli and fecal indicator bacteria. It was not Highly elevated in which we would see basically if it was heavily sewage impacted. We did see elevated also total coliforms, which we would expect during a significant flushing event during following a rainstorm.
The Goleta Beach and many other beaches looked like chocolate milk on last week. It was there was a lot of sediment and everything that ran out there so we would anticipate that over this next week or two The challenge will be as if we receive any other rain events which may impact water quality further. So that's something we'll be keeping a close eye on, as well.
Yes, that brings up another question since rain is in the forecast are you both agencies ready to deal with that in the volume that it's forecasting?
Our operations are returning to normal. We're in the process of investigating the cause of this bill and correcting the problem. I'm confident that we will have it handled by Friday, and we should have a final report into the Regional Water Quality Control Board at that point. I'd also like to point out that Sunday and Monday there was a very heavy rain event Also contributing to water quality control or water quality issues was the dredging of Tecoletito Creek, which ultimately this spill.
That was the first named tributary of the Goleta Slough that this spill went into and then ultimately to the ocean.
Thank you, I know we have members of the public. I do have a lot more questions but I'll keep them and continue the conversation. I know we're looking forward to the investigation clearly there are some discrepancies on reporting on amounts. The second part is about interagency communication between the two of you and others and having this kind of delay or miscommunication happen in the future but I'm focused too on the communication with our public And Director Hamami, I know you and Mr. Seifert did try to take better efforts to inform the public but when I went there with the City Council person from Goleta on Friday there were people in the water and that really concerns me so Can you please speak to how we can do better? For example, were our park staff notified because our rangers are out there.
Again it's a very popular beach so going forward how can we better communicate to the public that a beach is closed?
Absolutely and thank you very much again for your team and your office communicating with us directly. I think there is room for improvement in how we are delivering our messages, there is definitely a room to improve our signage as well. I think working with the parks and working with all other Media channels and coordinating with your office and with the county executive office then we can probably have a more aggressive Notification system for the public We have corrected the issue of the phone numbers our phone numbers for agencies would Definitely lead into the hazmat officer on call. So there is a real person I think now we need to look at how can we also have an interface for the public? We heard some feedback of others that are using a QR code and all that, that we will investigate that.
Yeah I understand Ventura has a QR code. That's good suggestion. Okay I think we have three members of the public that would like to speak. Madam Clerk if you can turn it over to them thank
you. Chair Kaps and members of the board that is correct. We have three requests to speak on administrative item number 19. We are going to begin here in Santa Barbara with Ted Morton to be followed by Hillary Hauser on Zoom.
Good morning, my name is Ted Morton. I'm the Executive Director of Santa Barbara Channel Keeper and I am a resident of Goleta. Santa Barbara Channel Keeper is a local non-profit organization that works to protect and restore the channel and its watersheds. We are alarmed by the massive 1 million gallon sewage spill that polluted the Goleta Slough and nearby beach waters. We know that multiple agencies are involved but we have concerns with how this bill has been managed.
According to the California's Office of Emergency Services Hazmat Spill Release Archive, the Goleta Slough and Beach spill is by a substantial magnitude over 100 times the largest spill reported in the Santa Barbara area in recent years. Before February 17th, the largest sewage spills entering local waterways over the past decade were two separate 9000 gallon spills in February and December of last year.
Like everyone, we are concerned about the public health impacts of swimming, surfing and other recreational contact in waters polluted by sewage. We are concerned about the impacts to fish wildlife and habitats in the Goleta Slough which is an ecological reserve nearby marine waters. And we're concerned about businesses that depend on clean water for their livelihoods.
We seek answers about the cause containment public health notifications and longer term impacts of this spill. We are seeking these answers to better understand how the community And local agencies might do more to prevent spills and ensure that the affected public is quickly notified of impacts in the future. And frankly, we're also interested in these answers to ensure recovery and accountability under clean water laws.
We have several questions some asked today including what caused the break? What steps were taken to clean up the creek and slough on Saturday before the rain? Why wasn't absorbent material used? The initial amount of the spill grew from 1,000 to 30,000 gallons and then to 500,000 gallons to over a million gallons between February 17th into 22nd. This doesn't build public trust.
What's the explanation for these huge discrepancies in these numbers and these adjustments? Why did it take until Thursday five days after the break was first observed or six days if it actually started on Friday for the public to be told Reports from Friday reveal that 51,000 gallons of sewage remain on site and had not been recovered. What is the status of this unrecovered amount? What is being done to recover it?
And then what is the state of the forced main pipe? The Independent reported that the pipe was installed in 1978 and was within its lifespan. However, the article goes on to report that the sanitary district was in the early stages of replacing or repairing The two force mains after the independent assessment. I think there are a lot of questions about the integrity of the force main pipes final question to think about the future what actions should the community be taking? To reduce the risk of these large sewage spills, do we need to invest in infrastructure replacements, repairs, increased monitoring? And what more can be done to give adequate notice to the public about this risk of swimming and having contact in these waters.
Thank you Ted that is your time.
Okay thank you so much.
We will now go to Zoom with Hillary Houser to be followed by Bernard Friedman.
1:19 – 1:265 turns
Okay. Good morning Supervisors, Chair Capps, Hillary Hauser from Hill the Ocean Executive Director and first of all thank you Supervisor Capp for jumping immediately on this situation. You called us what's going on? What is going on? Hill the Ocean has a long history of working with wastewater treatment plants to access state funding to improve And upgrade and if it's a flooding issue, how do we deal with that? There's the flooding that is more common these days have a great pressure on this sewer plant all of them. So we convened informal meeting of wastewater treatment plant operators The other day and to ask them these questions many of them that have been mentioned today.
And the long and short of it is, is that Goleta West is immediately jumped into reporting and they reported what happened there were disconnect in the communication there which has to be addressed but The answer to these questions, Galena West is going to be going through a rigorous examination by the regional board and oh yes. So the rest of us are rather we ask and we guess and so forth but we have to wait for the outcome of their examination and it's about taking best steps going forward so it never happens again.
The issues Public being advised about this thing, it can be improved. Even Galena West calling the regional board got a tape recording call back in business hour and same with OES but also the public at a moment like this doesn't know where to go. There's a lot of information out there. And I think it's important for us to make sure that we're not fooling around on the Internet, that there must be a better way that the public knows exactly do they call 911? You know, I think they need a number that is more accessible than jumping all over the Internet.
That we're going to have a better plan going forward. And we support the, um, the sanitary agencies as an important environmental tool and we're looking at these things with them not against them but with them to see what can be approved. And I really appreciate the Board of Supervisors putting this on their agenda. And again Chair Caps thank you so much for your And I think it's important that we take proactive action on this.
We will now go to our final speaker on administrative item number 19 Bernard Friedman, Bernard.
Yes Hello My name is Bernard Freeman. I'm a farmer of This morning, they will be on dinner plates this evening. And yeah so my testing, the testing that I do says that my water quality is safe to harvest shellfish from. I bring my water quality test up to San Luis Obispo County Lab because The Santa Barbara County lab doesn't have the accurate testing requirements or the state certified testing certification. In any case, I'm completely dismayed that there is sewage spilled into the ocean and then further dismayed that I wasn't properly notified within the 24-hour requirement as set forth by the manager plan that I have, that is signed off with the treatment plants. That's a major breach contract for me and What else do I have to say? And just the, for me it's mostly the sort of the, you know.
I guess you're trying to scare people out of the water but you're also scaring people from eating seafood and both actions are affecting my business. I think that's all I want to say. I wish there was some Better clarity and transparency. I wish that the testing that is being done at Glitter Beach, that the actual numbers were being shown because I'm a man of science and I need to see numbers not just a sign.
And I need better communication from the treatment plants. To me this is like an oil spill. And so I would hope that the county pursues it Like an oil spill and get some real answers. Thank you very much.
And that concludes public comment on this item. Thank you, any other questions or comments from the board? Supervisor Williams
Well just since some great questions, additional questions were brought up by Mr. Morton and Ms. Hauser and points by Mr. Friedman does the Executive Director have answers to any of those questions from Goleta West?
1:26 – 1:289 turns
Not at this time.
And I'll just jump in on that question. I know that an investigation is happening, will that be made public? Can that be made public?
It will be public information available from us and through the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Thank you we look forward to that. Supervisor Nelson
Yes, thank you Chair Caps. You know I think sometimes the public gets lost in numbers and you know I was just looking at this and looking back to the refugio oil spill this is 700 times or sorry 700% more than the refugio oil spill in size. The fact that it's widespread and not localized And that's unrecoverable and potentially makes it ecologically worse than the refugio hospital. So it is something to keep in mind as we move forward for the public when you start to look at these numbers, it's a significant issue and I'm sure there'll be a lot of attention on moving forward. Thank
you. And I'll just say from Mr. Friedman's point, he farms mussels and I don't normally I normally fish my fish, not buy my fish. But his mussels are going to be safe and I'm going to buy more of his mussels because the filter capability of a mussel is significant and it's pretty far from the spill.
Thank you, so I think we share the alarm of the speakers and to many members of the public that we've spoken with. We heard some ideas and proactive steps for what will happen going forward which are extremely important. And it's also important just to end this conversation by repeating that the beach is closed for ocean activity and we will do our best. Communication is clearly the name of the game here to let everyone know when the beaches are safe for public use in the water.
So thanks everyone. With that I will entertain a motion for passage of this item.
So moved.
Supervisor Nelson? Seconded by Hartman. Okay with the voice vote here all those in favor please say aye. Aye. Thank you very much All right now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on the agenda Madam Clerk are there any requests to speak on general public comment
1:28 – 1:366 turns
Yes, Chair Caps and members of the board we have 10 requests to speak on general public comment today. And we are going to remain here in Santa Barbara for all ten speakers to begin with Chuck Williams to be followed by Sherry Foster. Chuck?
Thank you. Good morning Chair Caps and Supervisors. Chuck Williams from Old Town Orchid I'm representing myself today at New California State. Our country is being invaded with thousands from over 160 different countries. These people hate us. My concern is safety for our county and our country. We are being invaded daily while Governor Newsom does nothing. Drug cartels are now doing business killing Americans in all 50 states.
We have terrorists coming in, violent gangs and Chinese military men are here now with arms they plan to kill Americans. Last week I sent all supervisors a 26 minute video from Ohio Butler County Sheriff Rick Jones, Sheriff gave a briefing about three weeks ago after meeting in Washington D.C. with FBI Director Christopher Wray. Director Wray said there are more red flags now than there was on 9-11.
Sheriff Jones said he is going to deputize his communities. We cannot depend on the government. We can't just call the military. We are involved in too many wars now. It will be up to us. Sheriff Jones also spoke of our need for our Second Amendment. In addition, after a debate disagreeing with Sheriff Bill Brown two years ago he offered an opportunity to issue a CCW concealed weapon permit to me.
Which I appreciated very much. However, I did not follow through because of the ridiculous unconstitutional cost, unconstitutional renewal fees. Our constitutional second amendment in Santa Barbara County has been severely infringed by Sheriff Bill Brown. Citizens must be prepared to deal with what is in store for all of us, including county supervisors. We need to be ready and able 24 hours a day to protect ourselves and our families without fear of charges for illegal possession of our own legally owned firearms.
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco recently spoke at the State Capitol speaking about illegals, theft, murders increasing while Newsom is releasing prisoners and closing prisons creating more dangers in our communities. We are in deep bandini and I urge our county supervisors to work with Sheriff Bill Brown on our second amendment and exposing to the public this urgent matter.
The will to live is stronger than all of the laws combined. If Israel had would have had this information, more people would be alive today. Thank you.
Just going to interrupt to say that public comment is now
closed and we will now go to Sherry Foster to be followed by Leanne Willever and Chair Kapp's members of the board I would just like to note for the record we did receive an ADA request To provide additional time to Sherry Foster, please proceed.
Ephesians chapter 6 verses 10 through 20, the armor of God. Finally Chairman Capps and the County Board of Supervisors be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power for on the full armor of God so that you can take your stand against the devil schemes for our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against the rulers, against the authorities Against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore, put on the full armor of God so that when the day of evil comes you may be able to stand your ground and after you have done everything to stand Stand firm, thin with the belt of truth buckled around your waist. With the breastplate of righteousness in place and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace.
In addition to all this Take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, and pray in the spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the saints. Pray also for me that whenever I open my mouth words may be given to me so that I will fearlessly make known the mystery of the gospel for which I am ambassador unchanged. Pray that I may declare it fearlessly as I should. This I pray in the name of Jesus, amen.
And now I continue on to a letter of Public Records Act request dated February 26, 2024. To address to Mr. Joseph E. Holland Kirk Recorder Assessor and Elections County of Santa Barbara P.O. Box 61510 Santa Barbara California 93160-1510. Dear Mr. Holland, I'm requesting access to records in possession or control of the County of Santa Barbara for the purpose of inspection and copying pursuant to California Public Records Act, California Government Code 6250 ET SEQ C.P.R.A. and Article 1, 3B of the California Constitution.
The specific records I seek to inspect and copy are listed below as used herein. Records include public records and writings. Terms are defined at government code 6252 E N G I'm requesting a true and correct copy of the following documents and or information. Number one, contract audit on companies providing services for elections and election machines. Number two is their corresponding grant application filed?
Number three, breakout administrative costs versus the contract amount. Number four, a cost analysis report. Number five, corrective action reports. Number six, deficiency reports. Number seven, non-compliance reports. Number eight, corrective action plan. Number nine, Contract amount with breakdowns for companies providing services for election machines. Number 10, training costs for staff, how the training occurs, what staff does the training and who does the training?
What certifications qualifications do the staff of those doing the training have? Providing trading credential dates of any and all trainings. Number 11, provide the service contract for the voting machines and trainings. Number 12, software and software upgrades cost contracts with complete breakdown of costs for software training for usage of software and costs were upgrades additional training for upgraded software number 13 Any and all policy and training manuals for staff or non-staff for the elections and oversight.
Please call me when the items are available for pickup, and I will pick up in person in order to save the taxpayers accounting postage. Thank you in advance for your anticipated participation. Very truly yours, Sherry A Foster, citizen of Santa Barbara County and a US Air Force veteran. Thank you and have a blessed day.
We will now go to Leanne Woliver, to be followed by Michael English. Leanne?
1:37 – 1:424 turns
Good morning my name is Leanne Woliver I'm with the state of New California. I am that present chair and senator of Santa Barbara County and New California encompasses 52 counties in California at this time on January 27th we had a demo election in Santa Barbara County and So I'm and what it is, it's a one-day in person paper ballots hand counted in same day results And I'm just coming back and giving you the summary of what had happened during that time.
The New California State Demo Elections were a huge success, and a reminder to every citizen in all county boards across California how quickly and effectively hand counting ballots at the precinct level is. And while many hand-counting methods would be just as successful, New California chose the Colorado Clear Box Method, and here are the results. New California was able to tally just under 1,000 ballots simultaneously in 20 minutes across the state.
The quickest tallying times were 16-17 seconds per ballot. Using the Colorado method, if we doubled the tallying time to 32 seconds per ballot each 1200 voter precinct can have those 1200 ballots tallied simultaneously in less than three hours after the last voter has cast their vote. And the entire state's results will be posted on election night. In other words same day results Citizens share that NCS tallying methods was more efficient than the tallying processes they remembered before the machines were implemented.
And with clear ballot boxes and observable tallying methods, the voters experienced a complete transparent election from start to finish. No part of the election process was hidden from the voters. All California State County Boards need to recognize that the elections belong to the citizens, not the county officials and certainly not state and federal entities.
The citizens demand the control of their elections be returned and that hand counting as small precincts be reinstated immediately. How much money each county will save by removing the electronics from our voting systems is astounding. Return our elections back to we the people.
Thank you We will now go to Michael English to be followed by Rod Walters, Michael
Hello I'm Michael English with the Santa Barbara Voting Integrity Project Our election officials tell us that we have the most safe and secure election system ever Yet there are gaping holes in the system that make fraudulent voting easy and untraceable I would like to draw your attention today to signature verification system that you help fund. Theoretically, signature matching against a variety of signatures collected from various government sources could be a decent gateway check in small numbers but the massive number of mail-in ballots that we process requires the elections office to use an envelope scanning device that is not as accurate as a human being The scanner naturally rejects a very large number of mail-in ballots because of inaccuracies.
The law allows for these envelope scanners to be calibrated to produce a manageable number of rejects, which have to go through a manual process. But this form of calibration has nothing to do with making the ballot scanner results more accurate. They only manage the workflow An unknown number of potentially fraudulent ballots are accepted by the scanner and then sent on to the next phase where the personally identifiable information on the envelope is permanently disconnected from the ballot.
Once that occurs, it is impossible to isolate the ballot if the envelope is discovered to be fraudulent. Having financial responsibility for funding the elections office, you should be concerned when public funds are being spent on systems that do not accomplish what they're purchased for. In this case providing assurance of chain of custody for our mail-on ballots.
I urge you to look into such problems and to find more effective solutions to spend public funds on. The only way to ensure ballot chain of custody is to bring back one day in person voting with ID Verification counted at the polling place in full public view. Thank you
We will now go to Rod Walters to be followed by Peggy Wilson, Rod
1:42 – 1:474 turns
Thank You I'm Rod Walters with the Santa Barbara voting election project integrity election project The county changed our election system to offer mail-in voting to 100% of registered voters in an effort to deal with the complications of the COVID situation. Driven by a sense of emergency, we have established a voting system that is wide open to abuse and the outcomes of our elections show that abuse is happening in a huge scale.
Over 90% of our votes are regularly cast by mail or a Dropbox, but at what cost? Not only are the outcomes being manipulated because of the disconnection between the voter and the ballot, but our community has become disconnected because it no longer has to drive for the important social participation of going and volunteering to work at the local polling place.
Easy voting is lazy voting and does not just affect the individual but the community. The circumstances that drove us to this way of doing elections have changed, and it is past time to do away with this emergency mentality. We need to return to one day in-person voting with ID verification counted at the polling place in full public view, not just for ensuring our voices are heard accurately but to keep us together as a community. Thank you.
We will now go to Peggy Wilson, to be followed by Kevin Snow. Peggy?
Good morning board and all the members my name is Peggy Wilson and I am also with the Santa Barbara Voter Integrity Project To borrow Mr. Williams' words earlier today, you said you were waking up the consciousness of Santa Barbara County to the vulnerabilities of electronic voting. California Code Regulations Title 2, Division 7 Chapter 3 Article 1 Section 20135E states if feasible drop boxes shall be monitored by video security surveillance system or an internal camera that can capture digital images and or video.
Monitoring drop boxes is an important part of ensuring chain of custody of ballots. Without monitoring, there's no way to ensure ballots are not removed or tampered with between when the voter drops them off and when they're collected. The public has an interest in viewing video footage of all drop box monitoring yet only one of the 30 drop boxes in the Santa Barbara County monitored election in 2022. There was only one that monitored. Okay, we have no indication that this is any different going forward to the primary election.
Our elections office claims it's not feasible to monitor the vast majority of their drop boxes because it's extremely difficult to secure outdoor cameras. If this is the case then the same problem exists for every county throughout the state and the regulation is pointless. Because it is generally not feasible to meet the standard. This effectively says that our state has no intention of providing the public with the assurance that chain of custody is being maintained, that's absurd right?
There was a financial cost to installing and maintaining drop boxes since this board has the financial responsibility for allowing funding of our elections You also have some responsibility for ensuring that what you fund is effective. Ballot drop boxes are not effective for their purpose unless they are monitored. We encourage you to look into this and either ensure that all drop boxes get monitored for the general election or remove them altogether And we actually suggest removing the drop boxes would be preferable. The only way to ensure chain of custody is to bring back one day in-person voting with ID verification counted at the polling place and in full public view, and to just finish I got a few seconds. I hope you all remain curious And concerned about this issue, as we said that case going on in Georgia where Judge Totenberg is looking at how Professor Halderman switched the votes right there for everyone to see with a pen.
So thank you very much for your time and all that you do.
We will now go to Kevin Snow to be followed by Mark Wilkinson.
1:47 – 1:524 turns
Good morning, Supervisors. My name is Kevin Snow and I am a board member of Montecito Trails Foundation and also a First District appointee to CRATAC, the County Riding and Hiking Trails Advisory Committee. I have been actively engaged with trails and county land use development issues for the past 40 years. Public trails are the most popular form of recreation in the county yet The rec master plan under development is being undermined by the new housing element that takes away the key tools historically used to acquire new parks and trails.
This is extremely alarming to all of your appointees at Craytac. Policies and directives do exist for the inclusion of trails in new development, but the planning and development department staff has so far been unwilling or just resistant to step in and recognize the urgency, the importance and the demand for public trails. This apathy or resistance is reflected in the draft housing element EIR.
To save the P&D a lot of time and effort, CRATAC has developed a detailed list of improvements to the draft EIR including recreation and trail maps for four of the housing element sites. The argument has been that the housing element exempts proposed projects from inclusion of trails, and that the upcoming rezone process is the avenue to include them. If that is the case, the County and P&D must act now as the housing element hearings will begin next month.
No one is against parks or P&D, but without clear directives from the Board of Supervisors to revise and amend the EIR nothing happens. The goal is to ensure the provision of affordable housing as well as public parks recreation and trails so on behalf of the trail loving public please do not lose this opportunity to leave a legacy or let it slip through your fingers Direct P&D to incorporate CRATAC suggestions into the revised EIR.
The trails are simply being overrun with people and usage, we need to act now. And I have for you, some of you may already have this but I have copies of the CRATAC suggestions and the maps. Thank you very much.
We will now go to Mark Wilkinson to be followed by Marcia Wertz. Mark?
Good morning Madam Chair and Supervisors, my name is Mark Wilkinson I've been the Santa Barbara County Council Trails Council Executive Director for over a dozen years. I'm here today to express our gratitude for your unwavering support for trails parks and open spaces we are confident that the county-wide recreation master plan with this comprehensive vision for and strategic approach will be instrumental in meeting the future needs of our community, particularly in providing the necessary facilities such as trails to support an active and healthy lifestyle for all our community members.
We rely on the recreation section of the community plans to document trail corridors that are proposed to be part of the future county trail system. One of the most helpful tools is the PRT maps, which show the general locations of proposed trails. As an example, it has been almost a decade since the PRT maps for the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan have been updated and the pending ag rezone sites highlighted in the housing element maps have never been planned for recreation.
We also need to re-evaluate recreation needs for communities like Vandenberg Village and Mission Hills since their community plans were last updated in the 1980s, and recreation needs have changed since then. In the context of state mandated housing we are deeply concerned that there is no plan In place to update the PRT maps with new proposed trail corridors, parks and open spaces to meet the needs of the expected 15 to 20 thousand new residents.
This lack of updates could hinder the community members ability to fully enjoy and benefit from recreational opportunities that historically were provided as part of new housing developments. We urge the Board of Supervisors to direct County Planning and Development staff to proactively update the PRT maps during the rezoning process for the housing element properties. This action is crucial to ensure the timely integration of trail infrastructure in new communities.
If the county does not act to update the PRT maps, the much needed recreational improvements will not happen and the window of opportunity will be closed for new and existing residents. Please do not let this happen. Thank you very much.
We will now go to Marcia Wirtz, to be followed by Karen Hauenstein who is our final speaker.
1:52 – 1:585 turns
Good morning everyone, excuse me Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. California Election Code 19025 reads and states A no part of the voting system shall be connected to the internet at any time B no part of the voting system shall electronically receive or transmit election data through an exterior communication network including the public telephone system If the communication originates from or terminates at a polling place, satellite location or counting center.
C, no part of the voting system shall receive or transmit wireless communications or wireless data transfers. Every polling place in the county currently verifies voter registration with an e-poll book tablet. The election office has stated that the purpose of them is to provide up-to-the-minute status of when a person votes so that they cannot vote at multiple locations. In order to do this, each poll book must be able to communicate its sign ins with the others. The only way to do this is by transmitting and receiving wireless communications which is illegal per Election Code 19025.
In the 2022 election, a poll worker filled out her ballot at the polling location at 9am where her shift began. The ballots were not picked up until closing at 8pm. At 11am she received a text from ballot tracks notifying her that her vote had been received and counted yet she knew that her ballot was sitting in the box and had not yet been delivered to the elections office How did Ballot Tracks, a public company know that she had voted?
Mystery. Big question mark. It is because the e-poll books are wirelessly connected to the internet in violation of election code 19025 This board allows the funding and of the use of e-poll books in our elections. By doing so, you are contributing to the violation of the state's election code. We urge you to stop funding illegal activity and steer our county back to one day in person voting with ID verification counted at the polling place in full public view. Thank you so much.
We will now go to Karen Hauenstein, who is our final speaker on general public comment. Karen?
Good morning. Karen with an I. I'm sorry I sound under the weather but I also have allergies. I've been speaking to you guys for a long time since before cannabis Before Dennis Buzanich. Before 1807 West Highway 246, which was the largest illegal cannabis bust by volume in the world ever. I've been here talking to you guys so I thought you knew me I really was under the assumption that you knew me, you knew who I was on a personal level.
Apparently that's not the case because the county has been spending a lot of money on security because of misconceptions, miscommunications which I feel were purposeful Miscommunications to stain my reputation. My name is Karen Hallenstein and I was born in Lompoc. I've done some uncommon things in my life. And my character. Is unimpeachable? I am published I am a published writer.
I have given you a copy of the article that I wrote that was published in a national magazine while I was riding on my protest ride to end commercial horse slaughter in 2012. I would like you to review this in your personal time, it will help you to learn more about me Also, there are other articles that are published about me. Specifically the article that was published in the Los Angeles Times February 14th 2012 You can read that one I've been vetted by the Los Angeles Times I received front page publication in the Los Angeles Times above the fold with colored pictures.
This is the Santa Barbara News Press article that I uncovered when I was doing research for this speech. And here I am on the bottom, and then Doss you're right here and Steve Lagavonino's dad is also right here. So there's a long history of my reputation and I don't want there to be any misconceptions about who I am. Thank you. And that concludes
general public
comment.
1:58 – 2:011 turns
Thank you, Madam Clerk and thanks to our members of the public for speaking. That is a conclusion and we will now take a quick break before moving on with the departmental agenda. Okay we're reconvening. Madam Clerk will you please read departmental item number one into the record?
2:01 – 2:184 turns
Chair Capps and members of the board, departmental item number one is from the Social Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the social services public assistance programs overview
Director Nielsen.
I'm sorry, I was just waiting for the slide to get there. Good morning Chair Kaps and Supervisors Daniel Nielsen Department of Social Services we are here to give you a very brief overview of our public assistance programs with me today is Assistant Director Maria Gardner and she'll be making the presentation
Thank You director Nielsen Chair Caps and supervisors, I have the pleasure of leading the Economic Assistance and Employment Services branch in providing federal state and local public assistance programs to our community. It is a collective effort through a team of managers, analysts, supervisors, eligibility workers, career employment specialists, and administrative office professionals. We collaborate with our Adult and Children's Services Branch, our Administrative Services Branch, other county departments The California Department of Social Services and the California Department of Health Care Services to deliver crucial and tangible safety net services, to assist low income residents.
Stabilize their urgent situations and work towards the longer term goal of self-sufficiency. Our department provides health coverage and food aid to keep people healthy, cash aid and job services to help people improve their economic security And protective and supportive services for the safety of children, seniors and dependent adults. Collectively our programs serve over one third of county residents.
Approximately 90% of those served by the department are receiving services from one or more of the key public assistance programs we will be highlighting today. Medi-Cal, CalFresh, CalWORKS and General Relief. At four district offices throughout the county and a call center each day we field more than 1,000 calls and in-person visits, some planned many more unplanned to process applications for new benefits changes to existing cases and annual renewals.
In order to meet the demand for health coverage food aid cash aid and job services we continue to leverage existing a new technology where possible meet the clients where they are and organize our work in a family centered culturally responsive way The Medi-Cal program is our largest program area and it's California's version of the Medicaid program. Medi-Cal provides health coverage for families with children, seniors, persons with disabilities, foster children, pregnant women and low income people including those with specific diseases such as tuberculosis and breast cancer.
The largest expansion of Medi Cal occurred in 2014 with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act allowing low income adults between the ages of 19 to 64 to obtain health coverage. At that time, social services also became the in-person extension of Covered California helping people with plan selection for those health plans. MediCal currently serves over 168,000 county residents.
Eligibility for MediCal varies by specific program but in general community members making less than 138% of federal poverty level are potentially eligible to MediCal. Other classic Medi-Cal programs continue. Some recipients will have a share of cost. Share of cost is the amount of health care costs a Medi-Cal member must pay, must incur before Medi Cal will pay for medically necessary goods and services.
Members are only required to pay their share of costs in those months in which healthcare services are received. Some of these services include prescription drugs, laboratory services, preventive and wellness services, and chronic disease management. Medi-Cal is a comprehensive insurance program with no set benefit level. Additionally, Santa Barbara County has one managed care provider, CENCAL Health.
Serving over 168,000 people in more than 80,000 households, Medi-Cal reaches 38% or more than one in three county residents. Our MedicHealth program primarily assists adults but the number of children on health coverage is also high at nearly 64,000 Which is 66% of the county child population. The caseload breakout is 55% North County, 17% Mid-County and 28% South County.
After the implementation of the 14 our case load grew significantly and then leveled out between 2017 and 2019 when the COVID 19 public health emergency hit we were we were required to maintain health coverage for existing recipients and our caseload again experienced year-over-year growth. In April of 2023, Medi-Cal renewals resumed and our caseload is beginning to decline slightly as participants are determined to no longer meet eligibility criteria.
Some key Medi-Cal program initiatives include the continuous coverage unwinding period regarding resumption of Medi Cal renewals, the Cal AIM initiative, and recent program changes Resulting in low-income 26 to 49 year olds regardless of immigration status qualifying for coverage and more low income adults who were previously ineligible due to asset limits also qualifying.
The CalFresh program is our second largest program area and is California's version of the Federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP. Individuals and families buy the food they need in order to stay healthy. Monthly benefits are provided on an electronic benefit transfer card that works just like a bank debit card to buy food at most grocery stores and markets, including some farmers' markets.
CalFresh currently assists over 60,000 county residents. Each month we issue nearly $9.8 million in food assistance benefits. Eligibility for CalFresh is affected by household members Citizenship status and the income and resources of applicants. Applicants are subject to both a gross and net income test. The benefit level is based on the household size and their income after allowable deductions.
California currently has a waiver for able-bodied adults without dependents, which is set to expire in October of 2024. Then these 18 to 50 year olds will be subject to work requirements or limited to three months of benefits in a three year period of time This will require extensive tracking. Serving over 60,000 people in more than 31,000 households 13.5% or one in seven county residents are CalFresh program primarily assists adults with the number of children receiving food assistance is also high at nearly 23,000.
The caseload breakout is 55% North County 17% Mid-County and 28% South County Our caseload continues to grow steadily each year. This slide highlights some key CalFresh program initiatives. CalFresh benefits are issued on an EBT card and electronic theft and skimming is widespread. The state recently introduced an app called EBT Edge to allow recipients to lock and unlock their cards.
Additionally, cards will begin to be replaced in June 2024 to utilize chip technology In November 2023, the state updated the CalFresh allocation methodology for the first time in over 20 years. This was long overdue and has allowed counties to consider additional investments in the program to process work timely and accurately. In 2014 our department established the CalFresh Utilization Project.
The project had notable successes attracting By 2020, Santa Barbara County had achieved the project's goal of raising participation from 40% to 70%. And in 2022, the project was suspended to free resources for CALSAS implementation. Efforts will resume in June 2024 with a queued list of additional solutions to explore. It is important to note that some people qualify for CalFresh but they don't want the benefits for a variety of reasons. For some it's because the minimum allotment is $23 and not worth the hassle The CalWORKs program is our third largest program area and it's California's version of the federal Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF program.
CalWORKS helps parents of minor children make ends meet. Parents who have lost their jobs or become disabled may qualify for temporary cash assistance for food shelter and basic living needs through its companion welfare to work program employable parents receive help finding work child care and work training or short term education And can receive services to overcome barriers such as domestic violence or substance abuse.
CalLEARN program and are supported to continue to pursue their high school diploma. CalWORKS currently assists nearly 8,500 county residents each month nearly 2.5 million dollars in cash assistance is issued. Eligibility for CalWORKs is affected by an applicant citizenship income and assets Generally, CalWORKs is available to families with children in the home deprived of parental care due to absence, unemployment, disability or death of a parent and to needy caretaker relatives of a foster child.
The primary wage earner must not have worked more than 100 hours in the four weeks prior to the application and by law, CalWORKs is not available to fleeing felons or individuals in violation of probation or parole The income limits are established by the state's minimum basic standards of adequate care, which are adjusted annually to reflect increases in cost of living and it's approximately 85% of the federal poverty level.
The current income limit for a family of three is $1,753 whereas the federal poverty level is $2,071. The benefit level or maximum aid payment is based on the household size and their income after allowable deductions. A family of three with no other source of income would qualify for $1,171 in cash assistance which is 56 percent of poverty level. The time limit for full cash assistance is 60 months or five years under the CalWORKs Welfare to Work Employment Services umbrella we offer an array of supportive services to help stabilize families and assist them on their path to self-sufficiency.
Those services include child care, Cal Learn, housing support, therapy for mental health and substance abuse issues, educational assistance such as school supplies and books, linkages which is a collaborative effort with Child Welfare Services, Family Stabilization Services and Transportation Assistance. CalWORKs is predominantly a children's program Serving nearly 8,500 people in nearly 2,700 households, CalWORKs reaches two percent of county residents.
Nearly 5,500 of the people served in the CalWORKS program are children. The caseload breakout is 67% North County, 23% Mid-County and 10% South County. After years of steady decline our case load has started to rise over the past two years largely attributed to a change in the time limits from 48 months to 60 months effective May 2021. Two key CalWORKs program initiatives include Cal-OR, which your board has heard about in concept for a few years now and will be receiving a detailed update later today and the Linkages Program, which provides stability and consistency for families involved in both child welfare services and CalWORKS The linkages practice increases effectiveness of services in both the CalWORKs and the Child Welfare Services Programs via coordinated case planning to develop a single case plan and reduce barriers for accessing services and resolving challenges.
This collaboration between the programs can create a continuum of services to support and promote child and family well-being for children, youth and families. The General Relief Program is our smallest public assistance program and is mandated by the Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 17000. General relief is a county funded program that provides small short term loans as temporary cash aid to indigent adults without dependent children who do not qualify for other federal or state cash assistance programs.
Employable recipients are offered employment training through our CalFresh Employment and Training Program And unemployable recipients are provided case management through our adult services SSI advocacy program as they pursue a permanent source of income. General Relief currently assists nearly 260 county residents each month, nearly $22,000 in short term loans and cash assistance is issued.
Eligibility for general relief is affected by residency age, marital status, citizenship status, income and resources. The benefit level is established pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 17,000.5 and can vary by county. Cash assistance for employable individuals is three months in a 12-month period of time. Unemployable individuals are not subject to time limits but must cooperate with our SSI advocate to pursue a permanent source of income.
General Relief currently assists almost 260 county residents each month The caseload breakout is similar in each region of the county at 30% North County, 36% Mid-County and 34% South County. Our caseloads dropped significantly during the pandemic and remained relatively flat for a couple of years due to less migration between counties and other forms of assistance being available but it's trending up in the current year.
Two key general relief program initiatives include leveraging automation and maintaining in person service delivery In April 2023, Santa Barbara County implemented CALSAS, the California Statewide Automated Welfare System which included our general relief program. We have also made enhancements to our county online portal called Octopus to enable clients to leverage technology to communicate with us at the same time services through a case management model at our district offices.
All of our public assistance programs are administered according to an efficient and effective service framework that includes horizontal integration. Clients are potentially eligible for more than one program, so we assess that at one time. No wrong door, which means that no matter how the client contacts us, we provide the necessary service at the first point of contact.
First class customer service, which means that we design our programs for efficiency and effectiveness keeping customer needs at top of mind and continuous process improvement. Our environment is dynamic, so we need to continuously assess new rules and new tools to reimagine our service delivery. We ensure program compliance and accountability through our county state and federal oversight partners conducting program reviews.
We ensure clients are advised of their due process rights and how to escalate concerns through a fair hearing process. We invest in reporting infrastructure to set goals develop and track performance measures, and make data-driven decisions. We do all of this through a safety net lens in order to ensure safety net services are provided to the residents of Santa Barbara County.
Today we are asking that the board receive and file this presentation and determine that this activity is not a project under CEPA. That concludes our presentation and we are available for questions.
2:18 – 2:2818 turns
Thank you, Director Nielsen and Ms. Gardner. Are there any members of the public that wish to speak on this item? Madam Clerk.
Chair Kaps and members of the board we have no requests to speak from the public on this item.
Okay I'll turn to my colleagues. Any questions or comments? Supervisor Williams.
Just in the past what kind of activities can increase knowledge of the programs and utilization? You know what has worked in the past?
Supervisor Williams through Chair Katz. Activities that increase participation include hearing from trusted community members about our programs so we have a large collaboration with the community based organizations, we have a quarterly meeting where we all share how things are going and best practices to be able to spread that word person-to-person also flyers text messages emails social media those kinds of things are helpful as well
Supervisor Nelson.
Yes, thank you Chair Kaps. I was looking at some of these slides where we talked about the different geographic distribution of some of these case numbers and I know now we're trying to break up things north mid and south but traditionally in our county we've called it north and south and if you kind of pull those apart it's pretty shocking. You know most of our welfare cases are social safety net cases I'll be PC on it, are in the North County about 72%, which underscores a message I've been preaching up here on this board is that we are under-invested in the North County not just in programs but infrastructure, economic development. If we really want to try to create that equality countywide, it's gonna take additional commitment from this board and from the county to continue to invest in the North County so that we can do what we can on the county level to make sure Those in the north of the tunnel have the same economic opportunity and opportunities to succeed as those in the south have for a long time.
So this presentation just underscores that message and so I appreciate appreciate it. And I appreciate the work that you and your department's doing I think is very helpful for the board and the public to understand what's going on out there and I'm encouraged by some of these programs are gonna you know Also hold people's feet to the fire that they need to do some work as well to make sure that they maintain.
They're eligibility. You know we don't want these things to be a crutch forever. We want to make sure that these things lead to better lifestyles and I think you know self-sufficiency should be the goal for all of our constituents. And so you know it's these should be as often as possible temporary. Obviously there's cases where that's not appropriate but making programs that incentivize positive steps I think is a something to be proud of and something that we should continue to encourage so thank you.
I'll build on that question because i think these rates while super informative and interesting also there's a couple different stories happening because on the one hand you want participation of those who are eligible in our last hearing we talked about uh an increase in CalFresh and making that Thank you Chair Kaps. Yes, when people no longer qualify for the CalWORKs program that is a good sign because they have earnings
Higher than the eligibility criteria. And so they are finding jobs that pay more than the cash aid would afford them. So that is a good thing and we do see that when jobs are plentiful in the economy.
Thank you. And to Supervisor Nelson's point about the north and the obvious need there for investment, are we seeing improvement where there has been more need or are we seeing improvements sort of across the board? Are you able to generalize regionally where there is more participation or less need? Just draw some conclusions speaking to Supervisor Nelson's point please.
Supervisor cap, chair cap. There aren't any data elements indicating that there's been a big swing one way or the other for geographic distribution of our cases with the exception of in 2014 when we implemented the Affordable Care Act Most of the new applicants came from Santa Barbara. That's a little bit of a pain point in the department, but it led to one of our biggest innovations which is equalizing work countywide and so even though the applications might come in from any region we share that across the county to make sure that all areas of the county have the same level of service with timelines and timeframes. But just pure counts other than that we haven't seen any big shifts
And Supervisor Williams asked about how you would get more people engaged. That's an excellent question. Would you say that the number one or a number one barrier is the bureaucracy, is the challenge? If I could wave a magic wand it would just be one stop shop basically because most of these, the population that we're trying to reach qualifies for more than one of these programs yet they have to go through all of the different requirements as It makes sense on one hand, but on the other hand it does keep people out. So would you talk a little bit more? You mentioned No Wrong Door, but how does that work with the Octopus online portal? Sure,
Supervisor Caps, Chair Caps. We have redesigned the way that we deliver services. 15 years ago there was a Medi-Cal worker, there was a CalFresh worker, there was a CalWorks worker, a general relief worker And over the years, we've learned to overlap that program knowledge for our staff so that our families seeking assistance are working with one worker as much as possible. In general, all of our eligibility workers are trained in both Medi-Cal and CalFresh. That's the biggest overlap. But then we take those trained workers and we train them for CalWORKs and General Relief So that if someone is, for example on the CalWORKs program there might be an adult child in the house who's not aided on the CalWORKS program but they also need Medi-Cal.
So then that worker keeps that whole family together to be able to reduce some of that bureaucracy. They are not hearing messages from different people. The same people asking to renew their case and those kinds of things. I would say the largest barrier is still having to renew benefits and submit periodic reports. When people discontinue because they didn't follow through with those processes, that's called a procedural discontinuance. It doesn't mean that they are no longer eligible. It just means we can't continue to grant eligibility because we don't have a piece of paper that we need.
And are those all on an annual basis? The renewals or do they vary by program?
It varies in general. CalWORKs, General Relief, CalFresh, those have semi-annual reports. Actually, General Relief has a monthly report. CalWORKS and CalFresh have a semi-annual report and MediCal is annual. That was eliminated a few years ago.
And so you're just underscoring how we started off this board hearing about job vacancies and how valuable the workers who work in social services are because that trust that gets established with somebody on the phone or on the other end of the line, ideally in person. So I know we've talked about the vacancies in your department too and the need to hire. You just underscored that. I do want to talk about, we did have a good conversation about CalFresh the last hearing and since then our office has been partnering with Assemblyman Hart and he has introduced legislation to help streamline CalFresh participation among seniors by aligning it with the Franchise Tax Board which I'm really excited about and commend him for having already moved quickly on that and we hope that that legislation becomes law up in Sacramento so Thank you to our former colleague, Supervisor Hart who is now Assemblyman Hart.
That's it for me on questions. I believe that we can entertain a motion to receive and file this report.
So moved. Second.
Second by Williams all in favor? Aye. Thank you very much. There we go. Okay, Madam Clerk that brings us to our next departmental item.
2:28 – 2:423 turns
Chair Capps and members of the board, departmental item number two is from the Social Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Outcomes and Accountability Review System Improvement Plan report.
Good morning Chair Capps again This item is an item that needed to come before your board either on the A agenda or as a D item. And I chose to bring it as a d item because I've referred to it the past couple of years during April budget workshops. This will also be a short presentation but we thought it was important for you to understand the details in this manner.
So with me today is Assistant Director Maria Gardner who will be doing the presentation and she has two of her division chiefs with her Frank Mejia And Dario Prodosi who will also be available to answer any questions.
Thank you Director Nielsen Good morning again Chair Kaps and Supervisors. CalWORKs is California's version of the Federal Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF program. The CalWORKS program provides cash aid and supportive services to eligible families. When families come to us applying for CalWORks it is often at their lowest point and they have nowhere else to turn They might have experienced a job loss and have been unable to find another job. They might be a grandparent whose grandchild would be going into foster care if they don't take them in, but they're without sufficient resources to do that without help. It could be a domestic violence situation.
Regardless of the emergency that brings them to us we meet them where they are and provide cash assistance to address their urgent needs. After basic food shelter and safety needs have been met we introduce them to the Welfare-to-Work program This is where we begin the path to self-sufficiency. We provide opportunities for adults to build a strong foundation so they can seek and keep employment, address any underlying barriers to that goal such as learning how to manage adversity, balance the challenges of life family and work, and ultimately succeed in a long term career path.
The Welfare to Work Program serves a subset of CalWORKs recipients approximately 1200 people Participation in welfare to work is mandatory for adults with some limited exemptions. The state and federal government provides 60 months of assistance to help these families achieve self-sufficiency the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Outcomes and Accountability Review Cal or framework was established by Senate Bill 89 in 2017 Cal-OR was developed by the California Department of Social Services in partnership with various stakeholders to establish a local, data driven continuous quality improvement cycle designed to deliver better participant outcomes and drive best practice replication in the Welfare to Work Program.
Implementation of the framework was temporarily delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic but resumed in July 2021. Cal-OR consists of three core components Performance indicators, a county CalWORKs self-assessment, the CalCSA and a CalWORKS system improvement plan, the CalSIP. The CalOR continuous quality improvement process which includes the CalCSA, the CalSIP and two progress reports over five year cycles.
The first CalOR cycle commenced on July 1st 2021 with the implementation of CalOR. In looking at this diagram, the cycle begins with performance measure update on the left of the wheel and concludes with progress reports just past the bottom of the wheel. We are currently in the CalSIP area. In a continuous cycle in partnership with the California Department of Social Services, peer counties and stakeholders evaluate their CalWORKs program, implement strategies for improvement, and assess progress toward their goals.
It is a time for reflection where we ask how are we doing and how can we do better. Developed from statewide stakeholder feedback and refined through the workgroup process including technical experts from Mathematica policy research there are 25 planned Cal-OR performance measures they've been released in phases 15 are currently available and 10 are still in development.
Data is gathered by CDSS from CALSAS and other state automated systems such as the Employment Development Department, California Department of Education, Community College Chancellor's Office and the California Department of Public Health. Subsets of measures are transmitted to counties monthly via encrypted emails according to the performance measure calendar.
After manual validation, the data is uploaded to the public cal or dashboard on the CDSS website Data reported during the first five-year cycle will be used to establish county and state baselines for each of the performance measures. On this slide, you will see a snapshot of Cal ORE Dashboard that is available to the public on the CDSS website. The column on the right depicts six categories for the 25 performance measures and you can see that the dashboard is still in development.
The State is using this dashboard to gather and share data about program impact and effectiveness Are CalWORKs recipients increasing their earnings as a result of CalWORKS participation? How many participants are completing basic and necessary education milestones such as high school equivalency, college and trade school completion. Other measures focus on reducing recidivism rates and overall family well-being.
The Cal or performance measures represent a new way of evaluating client success by looking at the aggregate of measures as indicators of success, as opposed to the singular measure of work participation also known as the work participation rate. During the structured self-assessment process that was completed in March of 2023 our guiding framework was to look at this as an opportunity to improve services for families who receive them and service delivery for staff who administer the program.
We performed a comprehensive data analysis with the available performance data provided by CDSS. We did this by engaging local stakeholders across a broad spectrum of expertise and service areas, and our peers in Ventura County to identify strengths and weaknesses of current program practices, shedding light on opportunities for process improvement. Overall, our county self-assessment provided us with an opportunity to reflect on what is going well in our program and to dig deeper into areas for improvement.
These were the eight required elements that we reviewed in depth for our first county self-assessment. For each of the elements, there were a number of required prompts causing... at most aspects of our CalWORKs welfare to work service delivery system. In the next cycle, our county self assessment will include two additional elements. The CalCSA elements of initial engagement analysis and ongoing engagement analysis form the basis for our system improvement plan The CalWORKs program is not administered in a vacuum. In a recent client success story from our Linkages Program, a partnership between Child Welfare Services and CalWORKS, the outcome was that a child was able to safely return home to his mother and that a variety of CalWORks and CalWORKs partner services made this possible.
Housing assistance, counseling services, subsidized employment, substance use treatment, childcare, and the support of family members made all the difference for this family Those service providers and so many others collaborated and partnered with us through our self-assessment process. We wish to express our gratitude for our stakeholders for their time, their numerous contributions and their ongoing partnerships to affect improved service delivery for our community. We are especially grateful for our staff and our CalWORKs participants for sharing their day-to-day insights and lived experiences navigating our program.
In addition to work group participation, we made sure our clients had multiple ways to provide input to the process. We gathered client feedback through surveys which were widely promoted at three different times during their first six months of program participation and through participant interviews with current and former participants. I would like to share a few quotes.
At the critical moment I lost my job they helped me and my family a lot. Thank you. I went from being homeless and without my kids to passing the California real estate exam and working as a property manager. So grateful for this program. It's been a lifesaver, and I honestly don't know what I would have done without it. Our current program has several strengths related to the many service options and collaborative partnerships.
Bright spots include having an in-house job services team, an in-house resource support team that is co-led Co-located therapists from behavioral wellness. Employment program and a program to assist with vehicle repair expenses. We also identified concrete challenges and opportunities to inform the next part of the process which is this system improvement plan.
These include things like dealing with fear and apprehension housing and mental health issues more supportive service needs and a growing Mixteco population requiring additional language services The state requires that our plan focuses on two to three performance measures. Maximizing this opportunity, we chose three and we found a way to address each of these five challenges and opportunities listed on this slide in our system improvement plan.
Community partners, participants, staff, and our peer county Ventura provided input on the improvement plan for the three selected measures that we chose to target. For each of the targeted measures, a goal strategies and action steps were developed and detailed in the CALSIF report. CDSS has approved the plan that is now submitted for board consideration. Board approval of the CALSIF report is required before we can begin the implementation of the plan.
In this slide and the next three goals that were developed they all have a common theme keeping the participant involved in creating and working their plans Our first goal is to improve initial engagement by increasing the timeliness rate for the required initial assessment. That's called the OCAT or the Online CalWORKs Assessment Tool. With improved data entry, scheduling the OCAT immediately after orientation and ensuring reminders and written communication are provided to the client in their preferred language we plan to increase timeliness in this area by 8.5 percentage points per year for the next two years.
Our second goal is to improve initial engagement by increasing the first activity attendance rate. After the required OCAD initial assessment, we learn about any barriers we need to address before they are work ready. We use that information to develop a welfare-to-work plan. After the plan is developed, we want to see that concrete first step taken right away.
That could be starting therapy, registering for the GED exam, buying clothing for a job interview, participating in Job Club or starting a subsidized employment placement. Expanding access to supportive services such as transportation and clothing, we can better prepare our participants for their first welfare-to-work activity without delays. We will develop tracking tools and train staff how to use them in order to increase first activity timeliness by 15.5 percentage points per year for the next two years.
Our third goal is to improve ongoing engagement for continuing participants. We plan to revitalize our staff training efforts on the CalWORKs 2.0 philosophy, which incorporates brain science and trauma-informed case management in order to meet clients where they are and encourage their participation in setting and achieving goals that lead to self-sufficiency.
We will also train staff on best practices including capturing data more successfully and improved caseload management techniques Finally, we plan to increase the number of supportive services vendors to better serve clients in currently underserved areas. We plan to increase ongoing engagement by 5.5 percentage points per year for the next two years. After implementation of the system, formal check-in is with the first CalSIP progress report due next February that is followed by a second CalSIP progress report due the following February in 2026.
These progress reports are integral parts of the continuous quality improvement process and will provide an update and bridge between the current and then next Cal ORE cycle, including the status of strategies detailed in the CALSIP, successes and barriers in reaching performance goals, and necessary adjustments to the strategies outlined in the CALSIP. Between these milestones our local Cal ORE committee will meet regularly to ensure successful implementation and oversight of our improvement plan.
Looking ahead, the next continuous quality improvement cycle begins July 1st, 2026 and continues through June 30th, 2031. There's no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. We are asking that you receive an approved or mandated CalWORKs outcome and accountability review system improvement plan report for submission to the California Department of Social Services and find this activity is not a project under CEQA.
That concludes our presentation
2:42 – 2:4413 turns
Thank you Ms. Gardner, Madam Clerk are there any comments from the public?
Chair Kaps and members of the board there are no requests to speak from the public on departmental item number two.
Thank You Supervisor Williams.
Before we vote could I just see the slides on goal 2 & 3 again
Thank you.
Thank you.
That's all I needed.
That's all I need.
OK, great. Any other comments? I appreciate you bringing this forward and not having it be an administrative item. I know that this is required by the state, but it's important to see. These specific goals, the fact that they're so specific 5.5% every 12 months 15.5%, you know it does prove that their real work has gone into these requirements these bureaucratic requirements I just think when I see these numbers I do makes me curious I'm not asking this question what does that mean for people right and I know that is drives the work that you do so I'm not suggesting that that doesn't but these are people's lives and that we're talking about with I appreciate the dedication of the department.
With that, I will entertain a motion for the recommended actions A and B.
So moved. Second.
Thank you all in favor? Aye. Motion carries. Thank
you for your time.
You're welcome. Okay we are going to go on to departmental item 3 before closed session then we'll come back for departmental item 4 Madam Clerk, if you could please read departmental item three into the record.
2:44 – 2:545 turns
Chair Capps and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the probation department and the fire department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a Los Prietos Boys Camp LPBC site special use permit.
Good morning. Chair Capps, members of the board, CEO Miyasato, Holly Benton, Chief Probation Officer. Chief Hartwig and I are here today for a passing of the torch so to speak. In 1944, when Los Prietos Boys Camp was established, the Santa Barbara Probation Department had only been in existence for about 35 years. The United States was still embroiled in World War II but there were only 48 states in the fight since Hawaii and Alaska were about a decade away from becoming states.
A gallon of gas cost 21 cents and if you wanted to buy a house, you'd have to pay about $3500. Much has changed in our world, our county and our juvenile justice system in the 80s years since the Boys Camp was founded. Thousands of youth have graduated from the camp program in that time but we no longer have the same need for the facility as in the past and so we've begun winding down our youth serving operations there.
It's bittersweet for the probation department, but we are also excited for the opportunity ahead to repurpose the site in partnership with United States Forest Service and for County Fire to take it forward into the future. With that I'll turn it over to the other presenters.
Are we live? Okay so I'm Sam Leach. I'm the Deputy Chief over the Facilities Division for the Probation Department What you see here is a historical picture going back quite a few decades of something that I just thought was perfect to bring before the board and the public today, to just kind of reflect on the great history of the program that was there. And to provide a little contrast of what it was during the times that Chief Benton was describing in the decades that followed. So I really just wanted the visual there to help set the tone for today and to honor the program a little bit Next slide please. Looking at this slide, this picture I think looks a lot more like what many people think of when they think of the camp in modern times.
You know at its peak the camp was a central component of the probation department's rehabilitative efforts and you know when youth were still incarcerated for much less serious offenses than what they are You know, the camp provided an opportunity for youth to do less restrictive programming than what they would have done in juvenile halls. It was a thriving program it was one that was just absolutely loved by our community still is and You know, times have changed and the youth that were basically the youth are not being detained today for many of the offenses that they would have been put in the program when it looked like this. When it was operating at full capacity and this was the program I think that many people still think of today.
But the reality is today the picture looks very different. If we can
move to the next slide thank you Damon. So this is a little bit of the recent history of the camp. In April of 2022, at that time Chief Heitman had brought forward the public message that we were going to begin the process of closing the camp at that time so almost two years ago. As you can see in the next bullet point and in the data Population dropped significantly, going from the pictures that you all saw where we had triple digit youth there to the times of it being an average daily pop of about 28 in 2018.
All the way down to where it was five or six kids at any given time for a three year period there. The court stopped committing youths to the camp in December of 2023, and the probation department will continue to wind down operations over the coming few months to the end of 2024. The camp has not housed any youth since the beginning of the month so it is vacant as far as youth go we still have staff up there So while this piece of our history, and it's a proud piece of our history is no longer needed in its present form. I do think we have some very exciting opportunities to present today and with that I will pass it to our partners and Chief Hartwig from the Fire
Department. Thank you and Madam Chair it really is an honor for us continue the history here of this facility and really address some of the serious needs that we have for our hand crew program. First, if I could, I'd love to call out the U.S. Forest Service and their cooperation. Forest Supervisor Chris Stubbs has just been amazing to work with in his staff.
We have a chief and really it was Chief Heitman that started this conversation with us new about the need we had Chief Benton and her staff, of course is really taking the lead on on the board letter here today. County Parks and Kachuma really were nomads but we found a home there, a temporary home, and it certainly wasn't ever meant to be permanent. And then, of course, county fire staff who have really done all the work on this We don't have a permanent facility. We've been nomadic since 1973, but we've been doing this since 1973 and currently at Kachuma.
And in addition to to use the existing facilities for classrooms training for wildland fire and others, we do want to continue to recognize the history of I'm fortunate enough to go up and look at the camp multiple times to see how it would fit our needs. They have a conference room there that is just filled with history, dignitaries and politicians. And I hope to be able to, and I'm sure probation will want to take some of that history with them but I really do hope that we can find a place there to really act more as a museum to honor all of the work that has been done on behalf of many youth there at the camp.
There's a lot of future opportunities that exist between us. We have now worked for, well probably now a year with probation to figure out exactly what we can do there at that camp, a secured facility with their youth. We think that there is a great opportunity to do that. We know that with our hand crew program of training Young men and women that are now serving as firefighters in departments throughout the state.
We, I have history actually Holly recalls as well in our previous posts that with the sheriff and partnering with them to teach some of these incarcerated youth teamwork and small engine repair and outdoor trimming and landscaping. And so we really do look forward to using our firefighters as mentors for these young men. I was raised by a single mother and she relied on male role models to come alongside me and put their arm around me and say, Mark, you can do it. Sometimes the only word of affirmation I ever heard from a male role model was somebody who came alongside me. I didn't know very well but I respected who said you can do it and so I'm passionate about that. I know Holly is as well and so we're the potential for those programs.
And then of course it provides a permanent base for us. Right now we again, we enjoy the hospitality really of parks but we also know that we need to be established somewhere the program, the need The responsibility we have and the value of our fire, wildland and crew program especially with the recent funding from CAL FIRE. The ongoing funding in the gray book, their funding document for us only continues to make that program more permanent and then of course to perpetuate this partnership, to grow this partnership with probation but also with the Forest Service We enjoy a great relationship right now, but we see even greater opportunities in that partnership with Forest Service and I'll pass it over back to Chief Benton for recommended action.
2:54 – 2:599 turns
A few recommended actions before your board to receive and file this presentation. To approve the co-location of probation and the county fire department at the current site of the boys camp, to authorize the fire department to apply for the United States Forest Service long term permit. And I think that you know this is an action that's beneficial to the community, to the to our ongoing partnership with FIRE because we do intend to build a program for our youth with them.
We're excited about that opportunity and that concludes the presentation, we're open for questions.
Thank you for a very cohesive presentation Madam Clerk are there any requests to speak from the public?
Chair Caps and members of the board we have no requests to speak from the public on this item.
All right any questions from the board? Supervisor Nelson?
Yes thank you Chair Caps I appreciate the presentation and I understand that there's Longer need. But then there's kind of a pause there because it's not that the need doesn't exist, it's that state law has changed on what we are allowed to do within the juvenile division of probation is my understanding if that's.
Supervisor Nielsen through the chair. I think it's a number of different things. The laws have changed but we have implemented a great deal of local initiatives and reform to our juvenile justice system, and the number of youth in our juvenile justice system has dropped dramatically over the last five years in particular When I came to this county in 2018, our number of youth on probation was in the 500s. Now we're down in the low 200s. So that the youth who actually used to be committed to the camp, that population technically no longer exists. Those are youth that are being diverted into other programs. They're not youth that are actually in custody or being held in our juvenile facilities any longer. Most of the youth in our juvenile facilities are there for extremely serious charges and violent charges, and they're not really appropriate for an open facility any longer.
And that is part of the genesis of why that facility is no longer needed.
Yeah I understand that and I think there's a different perspective that you know that crime and those crimes existing among youth is still happening We're just not enforcing on that group. And that's why we're also seeing violent crime go up among youth during this period of time is partly because we're not having those early interventions with law enforcement. I know that there's a big scary you know thought that if we engage youth with the law enforcement somehow let's say schools to prison pipeline but often it's an opportunity for learning experience. There's a lot of You know, I got a chance to go tour about 12 years ago with Supervisor Adam when he first got elected and heard from so many of the boys there that don't want to go home.
Right? That they wanted to be at the camp, that they did not want to be sent back to the environment where they had committed these acts or these criminal crimes. actions. So I do think it's a it's kind of a sad state of where we're going in the state of California with a program like this there's really no longer a place for it because I do think you know listening talking to our men and women that are on the street that are on patrol there is a serious criminal issues with our youth but there's really just no tools for to deal with it so I think at some point there's gonna be a swing back to that and with that or to engaging with them In the future.
So I'm actually one that transitions to me that I'm glad they were keeping the facility 80 years ago, this was something that you could permit. I don't think it's something can be permitted today so I think that's a big deal and once you lose this camp we'll never get it back and also along with losing There's a huge financial liability for the county. I would imagine we'd have to probably remediate the facility and return it back to the forest, which I'm sure would be costs in the millions so I'm really thankful for this opportunity. Like Chief Hartwig, I was also raised by a single mom and leaned on coaches, youth leaders and teachers to come alongside me. So I think the opportunity that you're going There in the heart that you're bringing to the table is a huge opportunity for youth in our community and I'm enthusiastically supporting this item.
Thank you Supervisor Nelson. Supervisor Harmon.
Well, first of all I'm glad that you described the illustrious history of this facility and I'm glad you worked out a way to continue that in it in a new vein. Could you describe a little bit more about the young men who will come and how they'll be selected and what their backgrounds will be and what they'll what what the program will be like? I guess you're still developing it but from where you are now what are you anticipating
2:59 – 3:067 turns
I'd love to talk to you about the programs that I've envisioned there and maybe Chief Benton can talk more about the folks that would be appropriate for that, but really. Some of the activities that will be needed at the camp, for instance you either hire somebody to take care of the camp or somebody takes care of the camp. A lot of the work we do in fuels reduction and clearing our small engine repair going out with teams of individuals and taking care but will will be opportunities for youth there as well.
And it is a skill. It isn't just a technical skill, it's a teamwork. It's learning to... Some of the things that they might have had trouble with in the past was to kind of put their interests aside for somebody else's interest and the fire service as a team sport I couldn't help but looking at some of the pictures and from the back those could be firefighters. In fact, as you look at the barracks bungalows there and the training areas, those are what firefighters use today. And some people have mentioned that firefighters in general have decided earlier on they weren't going to go to formal education and then they might have just been an act or two away from a probation camp so anyway.
If I may, Supervisor Hartman through the chair. I want to express that there is a lot of room for creative development still but we have had multiple discussions even on site myself, Chief Hartwig, Chief Benton I definitely want to give credit to Deputy Chief Melinda Barrera as well because she's over juvenile field and she and I have been working a lot on the CMJJP and the JJRP, you know combined plan of looking at You know kind of the whole continuum of services we need. And one of the big things we've identified in that is the vocational educational need Especially for transitional age youth. So while we may be losing you know sort of a placement option of where they go to live, that doesn't mean that we need to long term lose the opportunity for you know it's going to be a small number of youth but a very important opportunity for those kids you know age 18 to 25 especially maybe 16 to 25 depending on liability.
But you know and maybe there's a potential for two programs up there. So those are the things that we've been discussing is, you know can we get educational credit through our community colleges with the program we develop? Can we have vocational opportunities with FIRE? But how does that intersect with our more broader goals locally to make sure that we're creating not just this opportunity but all kinds of vocational educational opportunities for youth in our community because if we're going to take a more community based approach You know in the face of some of the things that Supervisor Nelson was describing.
One of those things is to make sure that we're you know we're not just saying that we're actually creating opportunities for them and I think this is a great opportunity for some great role models and the youth who want to be there and have a specific interest in these type of things to explore that interest and learn something and hopefully become inspired to do something great and give back to our community.
Do you anticipate you'll be working with other nonprofits or will it be primarily our fire department?
I don't know about other nonprofits. I'm not sure if that's something we've specifically discussed, and I was remiss in leaving out Deputy Chief Stornetta who has done a ton of work on this. Thank you, Chief Stornetta. It's something that we can go back and consider. We have talked about the intersectionality with the community colleges, with SBCEO, with other mentorship programs So, you know there are possibilities there but we don't have it fully fleshed out. I think in one of the questions that would probably also come up is when? You know when could we realistically do something?
I think it's just to be respectful of fire because you guys are going to be taking the Taking the ball and running with it from here. Realistically, it's going to take the rest of the year for them to just get that permit done and hopefully get approved. And you guys have an uphill road ahead of you. So I'm thinking spring of 2025 is probably a realistic target to have some kind of program up and running there.
So that's a pretty good on-ramp and plenty of time to get some input and see if there's ways to connect it to other reentry efforts, educational opportunities.
Supervisor through the chair I also would mention that we work with a number of CBOs and community partners already on our youth serving operations and so we would of course try to fold them in where we could you know it just depends on the specific nature of the program that we end up putting in place.
Supervisor Williams
Well, I just wanted to make sure that you all knew the probation definitely did a due diligence to look at other ways to continue having serving enough of population at this site. You know comes mind the effort statewide to change the age of supervision which would be a best practice was unfortunately rejected. You know that could have You know, giving it more life.
So they both under Chief Benton's predecessor and under her there have been efforts made to make it work realistically and sustainably. This is another great option in a good future so I'm going to dwell upon the future and what it can do for the community and for a number of young people in the fire service and look forward to seeing that happen soon.
3:06 – 3:097 turns
Thank you, and I'll add my focus on the future and appreciate the acknowledgement of the past that you began this presentation with You all know more than we do, but we certainly hear stories of the impact that Los Prietos has had on people's lives. I remember in high school hearing positive things about outcomes from Los Prietos so and I know how much members of the community care and have questioned this decision as it unfolded.
But certainly you know leadership means transitions and understanding even though a program has been successful and impactful it doesn't mean that it continues in perpetuity and I appreciate Uh, Tanya Heitman's leadership and passing the baton to Chief Benton to do this. And then this partnership with with the fire department it just makes so much sense not to only be stationed there permanently but To have a training program, so I'm really excited about that and look forward to when that transition will start. It just is very logical and exciting to think of youth being trained there right in near Kachuma. So I do have one question because of that the support that those great doses had within the community and interest and as well as interest in alternative sentencing.
How are community stakeholders being involved in this process? Can that happen if it's not currently happening? If you could speak to
Absolutely. We after we made the initial announcement when Chief Heitman spoke to the board and said we were going to be closing the camp, we actually went through about a year's process of involving community members and work groups to talk about the future programming for A program that could be created at our JJC, the intention was to have a treatment program there.
And one of the things that we discovered in having that community input was that there were suggestions and programs that were brought forward that there is no reason to wait. Why wait? We can actually put some of those things in place now. So some of those suggestions that were brought forward, we actually began implementing out the JJC for some of the youth that are in custody there now.
There were, you know, I think four or five different work groups that were underway for more than a year with significant community input. We also have reached out to our community partners that actually come to the camp to work with our youth there and have spoken to them about, you know, the camp closure, next steps, have offered them the opportunity to talk about what services they can bring in and what the next steps might be for them in serving these youth so all of that has taken place Chief Heitman also did a community forum not too long after the decision was announced and invited a great deal of community input at that time as well.
Thank you, that answers my question with that I will entertain a motion on the recommended actions A and B.
So moved.
And C, I'm sorry let me repeat A, B, C and D.
So moved. Second.
Thank You all in favor? Aye Recommendations carry, thank you so much to all of you. And with that Madam Clerk we will break for closed session and resume in I believe about 30 minutes. Council please read the closed session items thank you
3:09 – 3:229 turns
Thank you Madam Chair, members of the board. Today in closed session the Board is scheduled for one item, Conference with Labor Negotiators and Employee Organizations All Bargaining Units on Representative Employees, Managers and Executives. The agency designated representatives are CEO Monomi Asato and Human Resources Director Christine Schmidt. And the time estimate is 30 minutes.
Okay, we're reconvening our Board of Supervisors hearing. County Council can you please provide a readout from closed session?
Thank You Madam Chair members of the board the board met in closed session on one item conference with labor negotiators for all bargaining units unrepresented employees managers and executives and the board took no reportable action
thank you madam clerk can you please read the next departmental item for the record
Chair Katz and members of the board, departmental item number four is from the General Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding authority to advertise for construction bids for the proposed probation headquarters HQ building project project number one nine zero one four. And this is in the first district.
Okay
director Lagerfest.
Good afternoon, Chair Capps and supervisors. I'm here today to update you on the Santa Barbara County Probation Headquarters building and request permission to solicit requests for proposals in order to select a construction contractor. I plan to brief you on the project requirements, the history. We'll talk to the location, discuss the building itself, address any environmental considerations, and then highlight the community workforce agreement cost and schedule.
The probation headquarters has been a decades-long effort that really five years. While the building is called Probation Headquarters, it's really the South Probation Facility as there are also probation facilities in Lompoc and Santa Maria. Alternative efforts were considered to look at renovating the existing facilities at both Carrillo Street and Hollister Avenue.
Both existing buildings are old outdated are utility intensive and were not purpose-built for the probation's mission. Additionally, operating two facilities in the south has been inefficient. My facility's maintenance team has pulled records over the last five years and have responded to over 1,300 repair requests for the two facilities. As we run through the dates here back in July of 2020 the board approved hiring R&T architects to do the conceptual design, programming and cost estimating for the project.
March of 22 the board approved programming verification and full design for the project. This past October we came back in the board approved construction management services to the Cummings Management Group and today we're seeking approval to move forward with There were a number of sighting considerations as we looked at the probation headquarters building. One, as I mentioned was increasing efficiency and this is for the staff both sworn and unsworn staff by consulting the two facilities.
Increasing efficiency for the public by not having to deal with two different facilities. Reducing the number of county vehicles required and vehicle trips as there are walkable adjacencies with the court County Admin Building and other criminal justice partners There's also the increased use of public transportation in that the transit center is only two blocks away.
The Hollister Probation Facility and the existing Carrillo Street parcel have both been envisioned as part of the housing element for future either low-income or workforce housing. We did not include the probation headquarters as part of the Cali Real Master Plan, as it has been envisioned to be downtown since 2019. And we also own the Garden Street parcel already.
Downtown location on Carrillo Street, I'm told it was previously a public works building way back in the day. Single story has a central courtyard no air conditioning has inefficient flow and when clients show up they end up lining up out on the sidewalks And this is the Probation Report and Resource Center over at Hollister, which I believe you all know was formerly the Juvenile Hall Complex and is now currently sharing the site with the Dignity Moves La Posada project that is under construction. And it's also as I mentioned a future site for potential workforce housing.
Just a quick overview on the map of the fact that they're five miles apart, though it takes a good 15 minutes with traffic and all the side streets to get there. So quick overview of the downtown structures. So the items in blue here are county and court facilities Civic buildings, and then the yellow highlighted there is the proposed site on Garden Street for the probation headquarters.
So clearly the Garden Street parking lot or Garden Street lot for the probation building is currently used for parking. There are 145 spaces there of which 81 spaces We have an obligation by the county to the Judicial Courts of California, to provide them parking. And that's part of the state mandate when courts took over the court facilities throughout the state.
And so there's a 2008 agreement that did state we are provided, we are to provide 81 spaces to the courts. In addition since 2015, we've provided an additional 40 spaces to the courts as part of a lease agreement and they have provided, reimbursed the county at $3,000 a month. We also have used the Granada Garage across the street six spaces that we have an agreement with the city on and the city has provided those for free as compensation for addressing homelessness through the Dignity Moves downtown site which is the little narrow strip there with the tiny homes on it Additionally the county takes the $3,000 a month that they get from Judicial Council of California and puts that towards another 18 spaces for a total of 64 at the Granada Garage.
So the city charges $165 a month for long-term parking on a daily basis so in order to meet our obligated parking requirement for those 81 spaces it'll be $160,000 dollars a year The additional 40 that Quartz has had the benefit of using through a lease will no longer be made available to them and they are working to provide more spaces hopefully through these city garages.
So I realize this is kind of an eye chart, hard to read but the big picture here is during There was extensive work done with probations to look at adjacencies in order to meet the requirements and functions of probation. This just provides a quick overview of what the design has come up with. So it's 33,000 square foot facility. We'll have 49 parking spaces includes public meeting spaces locker rooms break room wellness interview rooms counseling space classrooms training rooms and secure parking Ground floor, concrete masonry units with structural concrete columns. Tension slab and then the upper floors will be wood framed fully sprinklered to meet fire requirements and then in addition I'll speak more to this in a little bit is designed to be a net zero facility So from a overview and massing perspective, the lot itself if you've been down there has a bit of a rise.
And so the structure has been purpose built to take advantage of that. The building is pushed forward all the way out to Garden Street to the sidewalk which will help mask the parking behind it and keeps with the urban feel of the downtown. And then there is an outdoor plaza courtyard which will provide queuing space as well as daylighting of the offices. Just three different renderings of the expected facility, so this is from the rear parking lot looking towards that courtyard.
The middle photo there or drawing is what the courtyard perspective will look like and then again the east aerial as you're looking at it from Garden Street. So net zero energy facility, it will produce enough renewable energy to meet its own annual energy consumption requirements. So 213 kilowatt of power, 18% of the electricity that it consumes. Now this does not take into account the electric vehicle parking, but it does take care of the facility's requirements.
All of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning, water heaters, all systems inside the facility are going to be electric. There will be zero natural gas appliances in there. And then, as you can see the yellow and the red squares rectangles there those are photovoltaic panels on the roofs and over the parking lot in order to create that power. So the Community Workforce Agreement was adopted by the board in December of 2022 for all projects exceeding $10 million.
This project does exceed that and will be the first county project to use the CWA, and our request for proposal, all other bidding documents include that language for CWA. So under Project Costs, so the hard costs which includes Furniture, fixtures, equipment. We're at $47.5 million and then the soft costs which has included all the work to date design work construction management project management environmental utility connection fees and contingencies is that 7.7 million for a grand total of 55.2 million which equates to roughly $709 per square foot And from a project schedule, so if we go out to bid in March which is the plan.
We would look to award the project this summer in the June July time frame and expect a contractor to mobilize roughly in September. We have a two year construction timeline and would hope to open probation facility by late 2026. So with that, we're looking to get authorization to advertise for construction bids for the proposed probation headquarters building.
Actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant of Section 15378 because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment and more in-depth CEQA will be brought forward as part Project award. So with that we'll open it up for questions.
Thank you first Madam Clerk are there any requests to speak from the public.
3:22 – 3:3011 turns
Yes Chair Kaps and members of the board we have three requests to speak from the public on this item and we're going to begin in Santa Barbara with Joshua Medrano and then we are going to zoom with Dave Everett.
It's good to see you. I just passed Scott McGulpin earlier and he asked, why are the trades here with a nervous look? But we're here because this is historic. This is going to be the first project underneath the community workforce agreement and we are here just to make sure that you know we are ready to answer the call. That we urge you to move forward with getting this out there to put the bids out there and that we will be sending that over to our contractors. To make sure that you have competitive bids. So just wanted to thank you for this opportunity to prove to all of you that this was not in vain and look forward to continuing to work with all of you appreciate you, thank you.
We will now go to zoom with Dave Everett to be followed by Eric Christian Dave.
All right. Hi, I'm with the Western Electrical Contractors Association and I was calling in on Zoom for the same reason as the previous speaker saying that this is the first project with a PLA on it. Although I have to kind of disagree with his assessment. A PLA is going to make this project 13-15% more expensive and why are you debt financing a project and then making it 13- 15% more expensive with a wasteful and discriminatory This expensive project that you're borrowing money to fund is going to be even more expensive because of this Project Labor Agreement. Construction groups such as our own tried to explain that discriminating against 80% of the workforce with a Project Labor Agreement is going to increase cost, And for this project, it's a $55 million project.
And so 13% to 15% would be seven to eight million dollars and that's kind of on average. So the cost of your project that you're borrowing money to finance is higher than industry averages because of this Project Labor Agreement. And of course the costs and prices are gonna go up because under PLA over 80% of the construction workers are gonna be forced to pay into a number of additional costs. Merit shop workers are forced to pay into union healthcare programs That they're unable to use.
Also, union pension funds that they are unable to use. They have to pay fees that are equal to union dues but they'll get no membership or voting rights in the union because of these additional cost increases and many other discriminatory policies built into every project labor agreement you'll see three or four bidders for projects that used to receive 25 or 30 bids And again, on average that's gonna result in a 13 to 15% increase seven or $8 million. At Riverside Unified School District they just passed the PLA last summer on their very first project they had a $30 million price increase. Additionally this PLA will restrict the use of minority contractors on public projects. 98% of black and Latino owned construction companies are non-union and PLAs restrict the use of minority contractors on projects according to the National Black Chamber of Commerce.
In an affidavit submitted to the court Harry Alliford, president of the National Black Chamber of Commerce said that about 98% of black and Latino owned construction companies are non-union and PLAs restrict the use of minority contractors on these public projects. The final issue with this PLA is that it does not mention that all these local hiring goals, the minority hiring goals to veteran hiring goals they can all be done without a PLA and nothing in the PLA prevents the union from failing to reach any of these hiring goals. I can send you example after example where these goals were not met and there's no repercussions for taxpayers. The PLA has no enforcement mechanisms if the unions do not meet their phony local hire goals or minority participation goals or veteran goals And this project labor agreement bans all of the WICA apprentices from working on public works projects in the district.
Because PLAs are so controversial, they've been banned in nearly half the states in the country. I'll send you an attachment with a great map that shows that. It also discriminates against 86% of construction workers that choose to work in a union free environment. So this PLA discriminates against more than eight out of 10 construction workers, it will raise the cost 13-15%. That'll equal millions of
lost tax
dollars. Thank you very much.
We will now go to Eric Christian on Zoom who is our final speaker. Eric?
Thank you very much. Eric Kristen with the Coalition for Fair Employment and Construction. For 15 years we were fortunate to be able to convince the Board of Supervisors that fair and open competition was the way to go on your projects, and beat back various attempts by big labor special interests to impose a PLA on a number of projects. Unfortunately, recently the board chose to go ahead and find this solution in search of a non-existent problem and move forward with it. So project labor agreement has been put into effect. We will now be moving to the monitoring stage, a monitoring stage that we seek to take the information from and warn others about that will Barring some miracle, have the same results as the City of Watsonville's Project Labor Agreement has as a local example in which they have had more than a dozen projects that have had no bidders on them.
They are now actually revisiting the entire PLA issue to try and bring modifications to it. And even closer to home, the city of Santa Barbara whose only project labor agreement they've ever used On the library has been disastrous, it is a year behind schedule. It is over budget. They have a 25% local hire, whereas their previous projects before the city approved the PLA staff's own numbers where they were getting 80 over 80% local higher on their projects. So it's reduced local hires increased costs and it's now you're behind schedule. We anticipate similar disaster with this project and we'll be making sure to monitor those results so we can warn others what the effects of PLAs are. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, just as a reminder, just came out last week and showed that the unionized construction workforce in the country is now at 10%, down 3% just in a year.
And then in the state of California it's only at 16.7%. The problem is that when you reduce all those union-free contractors and workers which are the majority of your local contractors and workers, you're not having to bring in people from out of the state from City of Santa Barbara has witnessed. And that's what you're going to face as well. We've been trying to warn you, you know we're gonna learn it firsthand in an era of inflation that's never been seen before especially in the construction industry which is chosen to take entire swaths of merit shop construction companies off your bid list who will not be bidding this work because of the exclusionary provisions contained They'd love to, but they can't. They won't subject their workers to wage theft.
They won't subject their workers to discrimination in the form of being forced to join entities they don't want to join as a condition of employment. And so you're going to have reduced bidders and increased costs. And again we try to warn you but it's something that's just gonna have to be learned the hard way. So here we go. Thank you for your time.
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Thank you to our speakers. Members of the board, questions? Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes thank you Chair Kaps. Question about the parking spaces at the new building I see there's 49 spaces and how many of those will be pool cars?
3:30 – 3:3522 turns
I guess I'll turn that to probation how many pool vehicles do you need or county
vehicles? Supervisor Nelson through the chair. I believe that the 49 spaces that are left are after we cite a section of the building specifically for the probation cage vehicles and pull vehicles so the vehicles that are specifically assigned to probation are in a secured parking area, I think there's 22 spaces in the underground parking section specifically allocated for probation department vehicles.
Is it 33? Sorry, 33 for probation specifically under the primarily under the building. And then the remaining spaces are other parking spaces.
So I want to help me with math here. The math is important, I think so. 33 for the cage cage vehicles. These are the pool cars. The ones that are important for the mission of probation. What is available for the employees and the public who use the building?
We believe 49 is the available for the remaining employees.
So it's a total of 82 spaces that are actually on the project because that's different than the information I got yesterday? While you look for that, I have another question. What's the net increase of the probation's footprint if this building gets built in downtown? So right now there's how many square feet are being used for office space by probation and how many, I guess 33,000 is the number at the end right so where are we at now for promotion space?
Supervisor Nelson through the chair, the existing Creel Street building is 23,000 square feet. The portion of the Hollister campus that was our juvenile services was just over 7,000 square feet and then we have the probation report and resource center so the combined
I'm actually just looking for the increase in downtown. So we're going from 23 to 33?
So we're going from 23 to 33, yes sir. Thank you
and how many employees do we anticipate working in this building?
There's approximately 140 probation department employees that will be at some point assigned to this building because of the remote workforce it would be a rare occasion that all 140 will be physically in the building at the same time And so the building is designed with landing spots for those additional employees, but the number of permanent spots within the building is significantly less than 140 that we expect will be there.
What does that number?
I don't know it off the top of my head. It isn't in the neighborhood of 90 to 100 permanent spots.
So the parking question, there's 49 parking spaces in the at grade level on the back. And as an additional 25 subterranean parking spaces under the building for a total of 74.
Thank you. So for the 90 to 100 employees, there is that the 49 spots would be available for them? Is that what I understand?
That's correct.
OK. Do we have it? Contractual agreement for the life of this project with the City of Santa Barbara for the parking piece here? Because right now we're anticipating getting an agreement with the City of Santa Barbara. Correct,
we are continuing to negotiate with the city on pulling together a long-term lease agreement with a lengthy term and some option years as well that has not been finalized yet but they do have indicated to us they have capacity
What would we do if they don't come to a long term agreement with us. What would be our next step?
Well so far they've indicated they have capacity and so that's what we just need to finalize the agreement with them. This
is a lot of money to spend on a handshake agreement with the city right. Fifty five million dollars we're going to commit to this project And we need this, we need that agreement to move forward with the project right?
Correct. But yeah the plan would be to have the parking agreement in place by the time we award this construction contract.
And what's the length of agreement that we're asking for at this point?
3:36 – 3:4120 turns
Well I haven't got to the specifics on that I mean we at least a 20 or or longer period with option years beyond that, probably some 10 or more year options.
Okay so where are the balance of these employees that would not park in the back? Where are they going to park?
Well I mean we currently don't provide parking for every employee at the county And so we have a parking policy that dictates who is authorized parking. Like I said, we have the 64 currently at the Granada garage and provided as long as the dignity moves project is going will continue to get those parking spaces once the dignity move site goes away. I mean that's it was a parking lot but it's also in our housing element as well.
You know we've got a number of other spaces here at the admin lot that we can absorb some of that parking. Tuesdays are a little more full because of the board hearings but otherwise we normally have space out
there. So typically when we permit somebody else, I think we're self-permitted is that right how this works?
Right we issue parking permits.
No I'm sorry for the building itself, so the county is going to permit itself? We're not asking the City of Santa Barbara to permit us? We are permitting ourselves here?
Supervisor Nelson that is correct.
All right and so in that process since we are permitting ourselves are we subjecting ourselves to what our parking standards are on other public institutions that we permit? Because I know that's usually We have a standard for that square footage per parking spot. We've looked at that at all.
Thank you Supervisor Nielsen through the chair I'm Patrick Zorowski assistant director of general services we currently have a fairly large workforce in the downtown area. We have parking availability for roughly 50 percent of those folks so right now people are parking in the neighborhoods They're taking mass transit, they're riding their bikes. There's a whole multimodal approach to getting here so in this particular instance we are not in the position to be able to match one for one.
We have a long waiting list for people to actually get a spot in that lot And we've always been under-parked. In this particular facility, we're relatively close to the zoning district requirements but we do not have enough spaces or actual space without having to build a parking deck or some other type of structure in order to meet the exact amount.
I appreciate you acknowledging that it's, we're under parked already. What is this zoning? What is the requirement for this zoning space if it was through the city of Santa Barbara
Yeah I don't have the exact numbers it's typically you know two or three per thousand square feet. It can be broken down a couple of different ways, I don't have that at my fingertips but since we are self-permitting you know we do not necessarily have to follow those requirements and we don't across the county so.
Okay I'll have more comments some more questions though later.
Supervisor
William
I don't have questions so much as comments whenever you're ready.
Great, I have a couple of questions about well first I wanted to just acknowledge that this project which the part I'm excited about creates more space for workforce housing so can you please speak to the plans and how this relates to creating workforce housing both on the juvenile site and also the other sites?
Chair Capps, so as I mentioned in the brief the existing probation facility on Carrillo Street will be torn down eventually and that has been slated as part of the housing element and looked at for workforce housing. Additionally the spot at Hollister where the juvenile hall is or the old juvenile hall will be demolished as well and envisioned to be workforce housing and then of course the dignity moves It's kind of a challenging little site. It's pretty narrow, but you could do some construction there as well.
Excellent and the second fact is that this is a zero net energy project which is fantastic and I imagine that went into the plans for our climate action plan to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030. This is part of that effort?
It is a big part yes.
And I was happy to see the solar on top of the parking lots that we're discussing and moving in that direction as you have been, as we have been doing in recent years which is excellent. But I do want to ask about these parking lots because I just am curious this acknowledgement that we're under parked, I haven't heard that term before How much are we moving in the direction of actually subterranean parking lots? I'm not a big fan of parking lots that just take up valuable city blocks, you know with all these resources and I was surprised to see that this one would continue to have single level parking.
So can you speak to the ratio of subterranean and is there potential for this to actually be not just whatever the right terminology is for just a parking lot that takes up valuable
3:41 – 3:4710 turns
Chair Capso, I mean we say that there's 25 subterranean parking spaces but they're pretty much at street level as you come off Garden. Again the topography of that site it has a big rise as you go towards the back where the back parking lot will be so On the very early programming part of this project, we looked at a parking structure to be included which would have had 200 or sorry 199 spaces but was in the ballpark around $13 million additional to the project.
And today's dollars that would be about 16 million so that was eliminated at the time. I mean we have no other plans at this point to build any other parking structures either Subterranean or above ground.
So cost is the reason to not do that, it just seems as though we're missing opportunities down the line of this valuable space.
Yeah, that was good. Thank you. We've evaluated a lot of options for parking both above ground below ground. The subterranean parking in particular is challenging. As you are aware, we have a deck plan for the Chi-Rail Master Plan of which several levels would be subterranean in order for us to be able to save some space and then ultimately use that structure as a mixed use site for workforce housing on top. Downtown it's a little more tricky. It's just complicated. They're very pricey and it's just very difficult for us to be able to fit those in from a budgetary perspective on our projects Um, but the challenge between trying to meet the need for workforce housing and other housing needs as well as parking. It's just a fine balance and we're constantly trying to find that But it's challenging to find sites.
I mean, we are pursuing looking at some additional lots that we could potentially use but we would have to purchase those and it would go through the whole board process. But those are more long term options for us. It's just with what we have in our current facility and land inventory, it's just very challenging for us to locate those.
I appreciate that. I know we're going to be hearing again from your department about assessment of of county lots that can be used for housing. I'm not going to go in that direction, but I just do want to raise the question about the creation of more single-level street level parking lots when as we know land is exponentially invaluable. But I'll end on just again appreciation for the zero net energy, the solar or the battery storage, the charging stations. I believe it's 28 charging stations up to 39 in the future so that is all very good news to me. Thank you.
Supervisor Nielsen.
Yeah just another question, so the debt service on this maybe it's for COs office so what is our annual payment on this? It's probably 20 years is that right and what is that which fund is that coming from and
Supervisors, for this particular project I'm gonna ask Jeff Rappel. For the entire debt package that will be coming to the board we're estimating an $8.6 million debt service some of that will be fire funds as well so not all the general fund for about a hundred and twenty million dollar package. For this particular I'm going to ask Jeff since he's online if for this particular building what would be the debt service?
Supervisor Nelson to the chair. The estimate debt service for this facility is about $3.8 million a year for the 20-year term. It is general fund funded, it is part of our plan that we have developed of putting aside ongoing GFC to pay for this anticipated COPV issuance. As CEO Monizato said, the total package which we anticipate you're more considering later next month has a plus million dollar annual debt service comprised of internal service funds, general fund and fire fund primarily general fund and fire fund As well as some anticipated revenue, additional revenues that we expect to receive on the rental of RV spaces at Lake Kachuma.
Okay so and that was actually answering one of my questions about internal service funds. I was curious about that because there should obviously-
Only, only Supervisor Haslund, only to the extent that an internal service fund would occupy one of these buildings they would be prorated apart of debt services part But it's a very small percentage.
So the cost of the building is not spread out through the Cost Allocation Plan?
3:47 – 3:539 turns
The regulations in the Cost Allocation Plan allow you to allocate interest plus a depreciation, so interest as an annual cost right And facilities under the cap are allocated on a 50-year depreciation basis. So essentially, you have what they call 2% building use allowance plus any actual interest costs associated with a building that is occupied by a non-general fund department would get a percentage of that interest cost as well. OK, thank you.
Supervisor Williams?
I just want to say that I think this project is a good use of the space that we have. There's challenges to attempting to use that space and you know, I in general agree with my colleagues from the north that we should be trying to have more facilities in the north but we do need to have a probation facility that is accessible by the South County Courts. That's not really optional and this, as my colleague indicated, will free up two of the sites that will prove to be invaluable assets in the future and we'll do so in a way that has less ongoing cost to us than the existing facilities Both of which are very old, difficult to maintain and inefficient.
So I think this is in step with our values it's a you know also a thing to make sure that our employees have a place that's more modern And better quality, better work environment. And I would also say just that it's not a loss for us to actually have the city's parking facilities better utilized right? It's not exactly like paying ourselves but you know it's not that good but it is better than that going into a black hole and it has ongoing value if Santa Barbara's parking fund is healthy.
So ongoing value to us because we are one of the major employers in the downtown area. That being said, if there is no one ready to make a motion I will move staff recommendation A and B.
Second. I have a few
extra
comments.
Supervisor Nielsen?
So in general, I'm in favor of new buildings and definitely probation. They're an extremely important partner in our public safety system. And so this is not any... My criticism about this project doesn't reflect on that department. I believe that one of our roles up here is to think 30 years in advance. And when people look back and go, you know, when you built that, you know, I wonder if they would have thought about that then? And I think that will be potentially viewed 30 years from now, people looking back and we had a problem with parking in downtown.
We're going to make it worse. I mean, we already under parked by our own standards that we have in our LUDC for public institutions. These are our code for if we actually had somebody build something like this that would serve the public would be one spot for every 200 square feet. If we use that number just for our downtown facilities, we have to provide 1,940 parking spots for just our buildings in downtown. We right now have one tenth of that and we're going to make it worse. Now I understand that number is probably low for the multimodal strategy but it's woefully low. We already know it's a problem. We have people parking in neighborhoods.
We already have employees who have to leave their desk every hour and a half to go hook more money or move their car so they don't get towed You know I think as we look at this to me that's problematic. That said, I think we would have included actually one other piece there. This is also some of the most expensive real estate in the world that we have here in Santa Barbara, downtown Santa Barbara and to put government institutions on some of the most expensive real estate, I don't know if that makes perfect sense That said I know that the courthouse is historic and we can't move the courthouse. And I know that there's a there's an advantage to being near that even though in Santa Maria our probation is not near our courthouse but we still survive.
So I think that there's reasons not to do it but I would have ultimately supported this if it included the parking garage so I'm just going to put that out there on the other piece that would have helped me be more comfortable if we didn't have the parking garage was actually having a long term or maybe permanent agreement with The city because I do think that it's a bad negotiating practice to go into an agreement and negotiate with the third party when you're already up, you know over a barrel.
Hopefully the city is fair with us The city has lots of plans for growth in downtown as well. They want to do additional housing, there's going to be additional demands. We're not the only user in downtown Santa Barbara so I think this is gonna be an ongoing concern. I think maybe even before we move forward with housing on some of these other sites on Carrillo and on Santa Barbara at the Dignity Move site, we should probably just make sure you take a second look, make sure we've locked down that long-term agreement with the city before we put housing on those projects. I think that would probably be prudent So I'm not ready to approve it today. I'm sure there's a vote here to move along so I just want to make sure that I publicly expressed what my hesitations were and why I would be opposing moving forward this project as is one last thing going to the community workforce agreement.
I hope that we do a survey of local workforce. So when this project is done we can look at that and compare it to the previous status quo That we had I think it's important for us for the feedback loop on our first agreement. So that's something else I hope that staff would include in the future. Thank you.
Thank you. I agree with many of your comments and with that I will call for a roll call vote. On recommended actions A and B we have a motion on the floor and a second so I believe I'm good with moving forward with a roll call vote.
Roll-call vote Passed 2–1 motion on the floor and a second so I believe I'm good with moving forward with a roll call
Show transcript
3:53 – 4:005 turns
Okay,
moving on to our last departmental item. Madam Clerk will you please read departmental item number five into the record?
Chair Kaps and members of the board, departmental item number five is from the county executive office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the fiscal year 2024 through 2025 legislative funding critical projects list and legislative budget goals list.
Please begin, thank you.
Thank you good afternoon Chair Kaps and members of the board this item is before your board to request approval of the 2024-2025 legislative funding critical projects list as well as the 2024-2025 legislative budget goals consisting of projects to consider for submittal for federal earmarked community project funding, as well as state budget member requests. This presentation will include an overview of projects identified for funding consideration, as well as a brief overview of the appropriations process.
So this list will, this year we identified 16 total projects and will be used by staff and our state and federal lobbyists to select projects for submission to both our state and federal delegation that are viable and meet the criteria that will be set forth in the appropriations process. We are still waiting to hear from the committees to release their guidance that would excuse me help our federal lobbyists and staff guide project selection.
So this year we have identified 16 total projects listed, climate energy and environmental protection housing homelessness and vulnerable populations as well as community infrastructure and sustainability the legislative program committee reviewed this list on February 12th this year they reviewed both the lists of projects list as well as the legislative budget goals and they did direct staff to include one additional project which was the Lompoc animal shelter, which we've included to that list as well.
So here's just a quick overview of the project and selection project, the review and selection projects. Staff obtains projects from various departments. We look at the 2024 legislative platform that was adopted by your board, as well as the capital improvement program unfunded projects list We receive input from various departments including Public Works, General Services, Community Development, Planning and Development, Information Technology as well as the CEO's office. And we look at those projects, we identify the cost for each project, we screen for the cost threshold and ask the various departments to submit a multitude of information when we compile this list for you.
So I will just do a quick overview of our project funding appropriations deadline process, and we do have our federal lobbyist Dawn Grillcrest on Zoom as well for questions. As well as our state lobbyists HB Gene Hurst is available for any questions but this slide here is focused on the federal process so we are limited to the number of projects submitted to each senator and congressman Typically we get around five to ten projects that we are able to submit for funding consideration and each of those projects requires demonstrated community support.
So, we tend to look for letters of support from elected community leaders as well as Any press articles highlighting the need for a specific project and support from local newspaper editorial boards, et cetera. So the appropriations committees typically issue their guidance and deadlines for their process. And our senators and congressmen also issue their own guidance and deadlines which we are still awaiting. Our federal lobbyist works very closely with the delegation on project submission for these projects. They're vetted very carefully Each project eligibility, there's one listed here on the slide. The approximate cost range is approximately $500,000 to $2 million per project. Some of those factors are project scope, size, cost estimate like I mentioned, priorities of the local delegation as well as community support.
So those are all taken into consideration when we select projects for submission. We have heard from Senator Butler on her deadlines, but we are still waiting to hear from Senator Padilla as well as Congressman Carvajal. We're estimating that those deadlines are going to be in March or April so that's just our estimate here. So this next slide is going to cover the actual projects that we've compiled to date.
There are 16 like I mentioned, and in your packet you'll see brief descriptions of each of those projects all ranging in cost but the sweet spot is going to be the $500,000-$2 million range so those projects are listed here And here's some additional projects. So once this list is approved by your board and the committees release their guidance, engaging the success of each project they'll review the funding criteria with us as well as the viability and at this time tentative proposed projects have not been identified for submission as we await committee guidance and deadlines will be moving forward towards that.
So that concludes my presentation today. Our recommendation is to approve the 2024 legislative project funding list as well as the legislative budget goals, which will be considered for submittal to our senators and congressmen related to the community project funding as well as state budget requests if any provide any other direction as appropriate as well as determine the above actions are not subject With that I am available for questions and we have both our state and federal lobbyists as well.
4:00 – 4:1010 turns
I think this is partly a de-item because I asked for it to be a de-item because I was concerned about as we go from our list of 16 items down to 7 or 10 that I was hoping that we could get some direction from the board to include our offices with that. You know, as we narrow it down I think it makes sense that, you know we have five offices. There's also countywide projects and things like that.
Our office doesn't always engage on some of the projects in the list. You know a couple years ago we did and we had some successful funding from Congressman Carbajal to my district this year there's there's an item on there that our office isn't working on. I want to make sure that that makes the final list so that all that work doesn't go unrealized so I was hoping that we might be able to talk about maybe getting some of that distributed with the board offices concurrence.
Some potentially district projects as well as countywide projects.
So Supervisor Nelson could you clarify are you saying the list that we're providing? Yes,
as we move down from the 16 down to the 7-10 Right. That's going to be something that we push forward there is going to be somewhere between 6 to 12 projects, six and nine projects left off that list. And so I think that that's what I'm personally concerned about some of the projects that I'm advocating for from our district.
And maybe Mr., thank you Supervisor, Mr. Gilchrist can respond it was our understanding so we understand I think it's important for the board if there's particular projects on this list to voice what you would want to be emphasized but maybe Mr. Gilchrist can speak to the process and how this gets reduced to the six or seven projects.
Thank You Don Gilchrist president of Thomas Walters Associates I really enjoy working with the county on this process. It is a work intensive process, but it's a worthwhile one and our representative Salud Carvajal as well as California senators are very responsive to the county's interests and needs. We're waiting right now to hear from the House of Senate Appropriations Committees on their guidance for projects for fiscal year 25 Um, that guidance will include helpful information such as which programs are eligible.
And this can change from year to year. Uh, as an example last year, the house appropriations committee changed their guidance in significant ways by saying they would not earmark funding for department of energy projects or a Anything at the Health and Human Services, the health clinic for instance that we funded in FY22. And Lompoc would not be eligible now under the House guidance.
And they also put some restrictions on some other types of projects such as museums and things like that. So we watch that guidance pretty carefully and it's a big factor in choosing the projects that we will submit but it's not the only factor. We also look at How the projects align with priorities that we're hearing from Representative Carbajal, from Senator Padilla and from Senator Butler now.
And we want to put you in the best position to compete against the thousands of other folks that are asking for their support. Now absolutely it is certainly helpful for us to know what's important to the board and what's important to the county And we definitely take that into consideration as we're choosing projects. I will give an example, we know that for the County, the renewable energy responsibilities that you have are extremely important to the County and so we certainly are always looking for any way that we can move those types of projects forward.
However because the House Appropriations Committee set those off limits That severely limited our ability to do that. And so we strategize by hoping that we could obtain support from the senators, that didn't happen in that process but that was our idea that we could emphasize that with some of the projects that we submitted to our senators which they were eligible to submit to the committee however, the numbers of projects that were included in legislation were very few and so the competition was just too fierce But that's just an example of how we sort through these things.
But some of the other things that we are looking at in terms of projects are the requirements that we have to meet, which include things like eligibility for a specific program. The amount of money that is needed is actually oftentimes A lot more than is possible to get into the legislation. And so we have to be able to scale the projects to the right size, otherwise you're not putting your best foot forward and along that line many programs require a non-federal match. And so if that money is not available, that is going to make it very hard for you to compete.
In terms of what the priorities are for our delegation members, they continue to stress equity issues and serving disadvantaged communities. They are very interested in the environmental initiatives that we bring to them and anything dealing with resilience has a special importance in our region because of the severe natural disasters that Santa Barbara County experiences but at the end of the day I am working for you and for your priorities. So absolutely, anything that the board wants to share with me about how they want us to focus our attention is something that I take very seriously and work with your staff in the CEO's office to implement.
The caveat is I would want it to not be too prescriptive to give me your staff some room to maneuver, to best put your projects forward because we will submit as Supervisor Nelson mentioned probably five to seven projects and likely we will only get one or two funded in the appropriations bills. So we have to think about it very carefully in terms of giving us the best chance to be included Legislation that they, that the committees are drafting.
So I can provide more on this. I think there's an art and there is a science to project. I call it earmarking still. And in I'll do my best for you with whatever you give me just to do. Say don't be too prescriptive in terms of limiting our ability to maneuver on your behalf.
Thank you, thank you Mr. Thank you Mr. Gilchrist, that actually does help me understand the process a little bit better that as long as the size and criteria matches in place that many of these projects would be eligible it's just a matter of lining them up so we have the most likelihood to be successful. So that makes a little more sense to me understanding how that moves forward and that's not an artificial decision being made behind the scenes so thank you. I guess my other question would be for Ms. McGinty So how does this roll over to our state delegation from here? You know once we have this list of 16 items, do we use the same one from the federal? Do we use others? I know we were successful last year with the Lompoc theater. The work that Supervisor Hartman did and others to make sure that was on the list for the City of Lompoc.
How does that work?
Absolutely thank you for your question Supervisor Nelson. So we do provide the same list, we provide the projects list as well as the legislative budget goals to our state delegation and then from there they'll decide which projects they're kind of looking for that meets their priorities. That deadline is March 8th so we're coming up on that deadline okay
thank you
That helped explain things for me too, Supervisor Hartman.
So this is for Mr. Gilchrist first when Congressman Carvajal is eliciting or our senators eliciting a list of projects could you describe who all they're eliciting project proposals from? Are they eliciting from I assume local government but non-profits?
4:10 – 4:1511 turns
Yes so Representative Carbajal represents all of Santa Barbara County, part of Ventura County and part of SLO County. And so there's three counties, three different MPOs in multiple cities within each county that are potentially submitting projects to him. And nonprofits are eligible and certainly have participated in this process. They do share the numbers that that they receive, I'm afraid I can't recall. But let's say that they received one or 200 bona fide requests and then they will have to submit to the Appropriations Committee 10 to 15 projects from that list. And so they have to refine through quite a bit and they're looking for different things that we want to make it easy for them to choose our projects by giving Things that are tied up in a bow with all the details and all the community support clearly demonstrated.
But of course they really value the work that the County of Santa Barbara does, and they're eager to help. And so we get a very good hearing. We don't ever feel like we're being neglected by that office even though they're hearing from dozens and dozens of other folks.
And then I had a question about the state process. I think initially it was mainly from local government, but then it turned out that the checks were actually cut to the nonprofit organizations this last time so I don't know what our nonprofits applying directly and given the state's budget situation I doubt that we'll have much to worry about with this program next year or this coming year but Just wondered if we had any intelligence about that.
Yeah, I think Jean Hurst with HPE is on zoom. She might be best to answer that question.
Sure, I'm happy to supervisor yes nonprofits do receive quite a few of the state legislature's priority funding items of appropriation. What typically happens is Because of the sort of management, if you will, of getting those checks out the door. The state I think for expediency purposes tends to like to partner with a local agency to act as sort of the pass-through entity for those funds and a number of our county clients sort of act as a recipient of resources kind of handle the bureaucratic responsive and administrative responsibilities associated with those.
In some instances, that's not desired. And so I think you've seen the checks go directly within nonprofits that does require a little bit more effort. The state is very used to sending funds to counties in particular And maybe not so much with the many CPOs that exist around the state. So it really is just sort of a main manner of kind of trust, if you will, in handling the administrative burdens associated with receiving an earmark from state government. But as Jasmine mentioned and you mentioned I don't think we'll be seeing this sort of same copious amounts of legislative priority funding this coming year due to
Great and my final question is how soon do we start generating support for these projects and who should it be directed to?
So we will start, thank you Supervisor Hartman for your question. So we will start generating support for these projects after the list is approved so very shortly here once we hear from the committees on the guidance and the deadlines they'll be coming up very quickly in March and April so we'll be reaching out once those projects are selected for support
And that's something the supervisor's offices really can be helpful with.
Absolutely and they've been very helpful in the past.
Supervisor Williams?
I just wanted to let you, Supervisor Nelson know that you know I brought up the same issue about trimming the list in our legislative committee meeting and I was persuaded By Mr. Gilchrist that just strategically, it's better to leave the longer list so that they can salute and others can look for all opportunities where they may be depending on what is more doable politically at the time.
Yeah, I agree with you as well. It makes a lot more sense. Thank you, Mr. Gilchrist for your explanation.
4:15 – 4:167 turns
Okay, fingers crossed that these lists make it across the finish line there. With that I am asking for a motion on the recommended actions A, B and C.
So moved.
Thank you. Seconded by Supervisor Williams. All in favor?
Aye.
Let's see, let's be sure to vote on our screen here one last time.
On what plank? Oh there we go
OK. With that we are finished and I am happy to adjourn us until Tuesday March 5th 2024 in Santa Barbara. Thanks everybody election day. Thank you everyone.