UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:0212 turns
Good morning, everybody. I'd like to call to order the May 7th 2024 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk, can you please call the roll?
Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Better turn this off real quick.
Next item of business is the approval of the minutes from the April 23rd 2024 meeting.
Move approval.
Second.
Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Minutes passed unanimously.
Next item of business will be our County CEO's report, Ms. Misato.
Good morning, Chair Lavagnino and board members. I'm happy to announce today that the planning department received an award. The American Planning Association's California Chapter for the Central Coast awarded our P&D with a public outreach award for its balancing tool. The map-based application allowed the public to select from potential rezone sites to create a housing plan consistent with the state requirements. It provided an opportunity to see potential rezone sites on a map and select sites until a compliant plan is reached. The board used this tool during last week's rezone hearings to visually select sites on the map and track how many units were added to reach the state's regional housing needs assessment. So congratulations to planning, it was a very innovative tool that they came up with I think is the first in the state.
And that concludes my report.
Awesome. All right Madam Clerk are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Labadino, members of the Board. I have an announcement this morning for the board's methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment may do so via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page two if you have any questions please contact the clerk of the board's office at 805-568-2240. That concludes my announcements for today
Okay, are we also going to be talking about the withdrawal of item D1 at this point? Is that a change also?
Chair Labadino, members of the board. I do have a note in my script to announce that during the...
0:02 – 0:0715 turns
As we get closer, okay.
Next item of business will be the administrative agenda. Any board members like to pull any items off the A agenda this morning? I
believe
I
pulled the WellPath one, I'm not
sure what the number is. Yes 43, got it. 43,
thanks.
Okay and any members of the public?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board we do have requests to pull administrative items 13 14 15 16 21 and 43 this morning.
Okay excellent now entertain a motion to approve the balance of the administrative item except for items 13 14 15 16 21 and 43.
So moved
Second Moved and seconded all those in favor aye any opposed Okay. So
the next item of business will be the resolutions to be presented. Clerk, can you please read administrative item number one into the record?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board. Administrative item number one is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Brie Velia of the Public Works Department as May 2024 Employee of the Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here we have Brie if you will make your way to the podium I'll read the resolution into the record Whereas Brie Bellier exemplifies the county's organizational values of accountability, customer focus, equity and inclusion, innovation, trust and ethics. And whereas Brie models the transformative behaviors of collaborative problem solving alignment with the county's vision risk taking data driven decision making and strategic thinking. And where Asbury has served above and beyond the call of duty, managing her standard workload with grace and sophistication while also serving as a disaster service worker in response to major storm emergencies in 2023 and 2024.
She managed complex and expeditious emergency operations at Goleta Beach throughout the winter and spring of 2024 to ensure that the Public Works Department's response was conducted safely, efficiently and in compliance with high level of regulatory and public oversight. She remained dedicated and available for extended hours and weekends to achieve success with minimal supervision while other disaster workers were deployed elsewhere and often unavailable. And whereas Bree has identified the need within Public Works Department for an accredited pest control advisor and self-started to pursue classes exam and licensure for this role to ensure a seamless transition as previous license holders were nearing retirement and the Public Works Department now has a fully licensed representative serving this role on staff, adding to the department's credentials and accountability.
And whereas Brie has grown into her role as a senior member of the Flood Control District Environmental Team also available to train and mentor new staff members and an SBCC student intern, Brie has taken the initiative to improve the process modernize dual workflows and raise the level of quality of work within her range. Now, therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes Brie Balliet as Employee of the Month for May 2024 pass and adopted today.
Good morning chair members of the board, Chris Nett with Public Works. I just wanted to talk briefly about Bree and then Andrew will probably come up and say a few things but Bree is one of those people that sometimes you think she has a clone because everywhere you go she's there. You could be out in a creek in the middle of nowhere and she's there on a construction site she's there in an emergency in the middle of the night or on a weekend she's In a training classroom where she knows more than the instructor, she's there or just even at the yard. Just everywhere.
And part of that I think is reflection of her attitude of just Always going around with the mentality of identifying something that needs to be done and then stepping up and doing it. And that's really just a feature that we really appreciate in our department, and makes for a great example of what we strive to achieve in public works. Her reaction to this is probably, oh no. But to everybody else that we talked to about it in the department they were like, oh yeah of course so thank you very much Brie and then Andrew Rapp's gonna come up I think and say a few things
0:07 – 0:175 turns
Thank you, Chair Loveney and members of the Board for this award for Bree. I'm Andrew Roth, the Environmental Manager for Flood Control. Other flood control staff and managers aren't in training today but are here in spirit also showing their support for you today, Bree. We're lucky to have had Bree on our team for over three years now. Before that, she worked with Project Clean Water and before that with the Ag Commissioner's Office. She has been an asset for the county and the community through different roles and brings a skill set that no one else has to Public Works.
She is proven to be a smart dedicated public servant helping our community through two back-to-back very intense storm seasons She's dedicated extended hours, nights and weekends as you've heard from Chris as well. And she devotes a focus and energy to her craft. We're honored to have you receive this award Brie. Although there are many other county staff nominated, you really have shined for this recognition.
Thank you. Congratulations Brie and we're looking forward to the future.
I appreciate the recognition everyone. I can't do the work that I do without the support of everyone at Public Works and I just really appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the good work that flood control does protecting our community in the environment thank you
all right congratulations that moves us to administrative item number two madam clerk please read into the record
Chair Lavinino, members of the board, administrative item number two sponsored by Supervisor Capps is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Hillary Hauser upon her retirement for her remarkable legacy in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here we have Hillary if you'll make your way to the podium I will read the resolution into the record Whereas Hilary Hauser has made a remarkable impact on the Santa Barbara community as the Executive Director and Co-Founder of Heal the Ocean. And whereas her leadership, activism and advocacy contributes to the betterment of our ocean, the planet and the future health and resilience of our community. And whereas Hilary began her career as a national programmer The board of Supervisors meeting And whereas Hillary co-founded Heal the Ocean in 1998, which has successfully focused on wastewater infrastructure and eradication of harmful ocean dumping practices whose methods now serve as a model for other coastal communities across the country.
And whereas Hillary's contribution to Heal the Ocean and beyond have been recognized by the United States Congress, the Academy of Underwater Science and Arts, the California State Assembly, and numerous other accolades. And whereas Santa Barbara independent journalist Nick Welch shares among Hillary Hauser's signature skills has been her ability to bring the drum, to bang the drum both loudly and softly as an advocate. And whereas Hillary's commitment to the protection and reverence of the ocean Can be summed up in her own words all about the sea. Some find solace in isolated backcountry ruggedness dryness and gullies cactus and sage some for some the ocean is a great lap that waits with understanding and comfort with surrounding love and familiarity fishes and music and magic Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors acknowledges Hillary's contribution to the Santa Barbara community, our oceans and earth, and expresses our deepest appreciation for her years of dedicated service passed and adopted today.
Chair Laura Capps. Thank you for this. When I read the words of this proclamation and that the words of my book Dancing on Waves is lifted out for this proclamation memorializing the word that I wrote in a book, this is the greatest treasure I will have for my life. Excuse me? I might cry. I am really grateful for this and for the recognition to Heal the Ocean and to my wonderful crew.
I haven't been in this room for a long time, and as I was coming down the sidewalk, I thought wow! The first time I've ever been here it was a demonstration during a Board of Supervisors hearing on a Tuesday And what I had done is written an article in the Santa Barbara news press when there used to be full stories and so forth. But my love for the ocean has been forever, and when I saw the beaches start to close, I called the editorial director and said can I write about the closed beaches? And he said write as much as you want.
And so it came out of the news press a whole I'm going to read the front page editorial, minus the left-hand column and then the whole back page. And it started a riot. This piece people were reading it on the radios and people were crying. They're calling me and saying we'll give you money. We're giving you money. What? The great explorer here was flying across the country. And when they used to have phones in the back of the seats and he called me, said good on you. And if you need a 501 C3 call Charles. And that's Charles Vinnick who is the manager of the Cousteau Society and then the Jean-Michel Cousteau Institute.
And I said what's a 501C3? I've never even heard of what that is. What? And then Nan Marv, Jean-Michel's mate said now we've got to do fundraising. Fundraising? Fundrasing what's that for I thought we were just going to run around the streets with signs And, but the demonstration that happened out of the county administration building during a supervisor's meeting. The surfers showed up with toilet seats on their head signs ocean or outhouse and cars honking it was a scene and Naomi Schwartz Remember Naomi? She, 1st District. She looked out the window all the supervisors say what the heck is going on here? Naomi came down and spoke to us we had a microphone and the co-founder of Heal The Ocean who unfortunately cannot be here today Jeff Young And I stood up and said, here we are.
We're going to do something about this. Whatever we thought that was, we didn't quite know. But we did have a fundraiser, and it was in the first couple months. And we had some chairs in the Coral Casino. I don't think we had any dinner, no rubber chicken or anything like that. It was just like Here we are and Jean-Michel spoke. And Jean-Michel, anyway, we raised all this money in an hour and a half with nothing but love in the room.
And it has grown ever since. We started our activities by thinking we had to be the monkey wrench gang and sneak into wastewater plants, sneak into Tahigas, film everything, and say oh look what's happening. And over the years we got smarter and about working with government, working with the cities, working with the county. And if we want to change something go get the money.
And so that donor of Heal The Ocean are just insanely fabulous And so we would get enough money to pay for a study, do it together with the city, do it together with the county and work together and find more money to upgrade wastewater plant. And so it became an organization which I'm grateful for to be known as helpers It's that a fighter, you know, fight for a get a fight for be get me but just to let's work together.
So in in closing. This resolution. I'm going to have forever and I'm going to be looking at it my guiding star as I continue to write about the sea and about all of this And I say hello to Lois Katz, our wonderful representative who's watching, I understand. Laura, thank you so much again for this and all of you.
0:18 – 0:219 turns
Thank you Mr. Chair, I just wanted to add what an honor it is to honor Hillary Hauser who as you can tell is a force of nature and a force for nature and her love of the ocean is like the ocean she gives more than the ocean gives us, the ocean gives us more than we could ever protect it and ever give back to it and thank you Hillary for all you've done into all of Heal The Ocean for all you've done and will continue to do, thank you.
Supervisor
Williams. I also want to thank you Hillary, I think the first time that we coordinated is when you came with to Annabeth Jackson's office which I was working in at the time to say we need to hook up, rink on to sewer. That only took us about 15 years but and wasn't finished until I was in the legislature But I want to especially help thank you for Heal the Ocean's work in Summerlin. That has been huge, that has been such an important component of dealing with state lands, the legislature The Governor's Office and the great coordination to get both funding from the state and local efforts to make sure we plug abandoned wells offshore.
And also just your patience, I mean I know that is not the thing you are most known for. But it does take patience to be a regular attendee to LAFCO hearings. I don't know that I know a whole lot of people that are regular attendees to LAFCO hearings and Hillary has been, to continue to spread the gospel of waste water not failing septic systems. Thank you for keeping the faith on that and keeping the faith for the ocean and for your service to the coast.
Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you Chair Lavagnino I just wanted to take the moment. You know Supervisor Williams mentioned about meeting you with his predecessors or one of his former employers obviously met you the first time when I was working for Supervisor Adam and you were his favorite environmentalist he really appreciated your integrity and honesty and your ability to have a Your solution-oriented strategies. And I just, you know that really made you stand apart from your peers and we've always in the fourth district thought highly of you so thank you for all your service and what you'll continue to do.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you so much Hillary.
Thank you everybody.
Madam Clerk can you please read item three into the record?
0:21 – 0:267 turns
Chair Lavanino and members of the board, Administrative Item 3 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming April 2024 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Carla Huizar. Carla if you'll make your way to the podium I'll now read the resolution into the record April is recognized each month as Sexual Assault Awareness Month, focusing attention on the issues that harm women, men and people of all backgrounds. And whereas, as a part of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, Denim Day takes place on April 24th as a day of action and awareness to show solidarity with survivors of sexual violence. And enact efforts against victim blaming. And whereas sexual assault is a form of abuse that is exacerbated by misogyny, racism, homophobia and our systems of oppression.
And whereas one in three women and one in six men have been sexually assaulted at some point in their lifetimes. And whereas rape crisis centers and other community organizations committing to ending sexual violence emerged in California in the 1970's And have been doing critical work to prevent sexual assault and support survivors of sexual assault ever since. And whereas in Santa Barbara County, the North County Rape Crisis Center and Child Protection Center standing together to end sexual assault UCSB campus advocacy resources and education and other community based organization deliver service to hundreds of community members each year and educate thousands more.
And now, therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims the month of April 2024 to be Sexual Assault Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County and calls all government agencies, private organizations, and the people and businesses of Santa Barbara County to help prevent sexual assault and support survivors passed and adopted today.
Hello, good morning Chair and Board Members. Thank you so much on behalf of us, our staff members, our community and survivors for proclaiming April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month and for including Denim Day in here as well. As you know, you can imagine working in the sexual assault field is not Very easy, but it's something that we do with pride over at Stessa. We're actually celebrating 50 years this year. We've been doing work in our community since 1974.
We will be celebrating on the 18th of this month our chocolate divine and I would like to also extend an invitation to you all. So I just want to say thank you on behalf of Stessa.
Thank you. I just wanted to highlight the ongoing need. The event coming up on the Saturday, the 18th, I think is crucial for the continued work of the organization especially as various government forms of funding dry up. It's important you know Unfortunately, we still live in a society where people go through a gauntlet to avoid sexual assault in their lives growing up and we still need the vital services to serve survivors. And to make sure that we continue to work to make this society a place that it is not acceptable to tolerate sexual assault.
Thank you. Did you also want to?
Yes, just a few words as well. My name is Cynthia and I'm the youth educator at STESA. I wanted to thank you for recognizing and supporting the work that we do We see sexual assault in our community and we all know it is a global issue. Again, one in three women and one in six men have been sexually assaulted at some point in their lifetime. And touching on Denim Day, it stems from a case in Italy where a young woman was raped The judge determined, however, that because her jeans were so tight in the time it must have taken to remove her jeans this situation had to have been consensual.
So we are working hard at STESA to debunk these common myths in the sexual assault theme on a daily basis. The history of Denim Day and along with debunking these myths is continually taught to the youth in our community Stessa works hard every day to spread awareness and to bring prevention education
Very grateful for your support. Our survivors cannot move on with their healing without the support of not just the staff members, but our leadership. If they're living in a world where they feel supported, they'll be able to get onto their healing. So thank you so much.
Thank you. Madam Clerk can you read A4?
0:26 – 0:342 turns
Chair Lavinino, members of the Board, Administrative Item No. 4 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2024 as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Karen Aju, Teresa Chin, Ken Cochran and Helen Wong. Whereas Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month is a time to recognize the significant contribution of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who serve as leaders in business, government, law, education, science, athletics, the arts, and many other fields.
And bring awareness to the violence and hatred that this community has had to endure and continues to endure. The Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are a vast and diverse community who can trace their heritage to the Pacific Island regions of Polynesia, Micronesia as well as dozens of countries including China, India, Japan, Laos, Pakistan, the Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, and Thailand.
And whereas, in 1978 a joint congressional resolution established Asian Pacific American Heritage Week to celebrate two historical milestones in the Asian Pacific American history. The arrival of the first Japanese immigrants to the United States which occurred on May 7th 1843 and the significant contributions of Chinese workers in the building of the transcontinental railroad that was completed on May 10th 1869 And whereas generations of brave men and women made the dangerous voyage across the Pacific to seek better lives for their families, and in the process have greatly contributed to the economic prosperity and cultural legacy of communities throughout California and the U.S. And whereas the Congressional Gold Medal was awarded in December 2020 to Chinese American World War II veterans in recognition of their service, despite being ineligible for citizenship at the start of the war due to the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act in 2017.
In 2017, Filipino-American World War II veterans would lose their military benefits due to the Rescension Act of 1946 and in 2011 to Japanese American World War II veterans who served in spite of the reincarnation of their families under Executive Order 9066. And whereas Filipino Manongs, the Filipino word for the oldest son became the farm worker striker's identity led by Larry Itley Good morning, everyone.
D-Lang, Grape Strikes. And whereas Santa Barbara was once home to a thriving and bustling Chinatown on Canyon Perdido Street between State Street and Anacapa Street in what is now downtown Santa Barbara which was home to the Chinese immigrants that began arriving in Santa Barbara in the 1860's. The early Chinese residents of Santa Barbara worked in abalone fishing, farming, laundry enterprises, and domestic services. The Santa Barbara Old Chinatown was devastated and dismantled following the 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake in an attempt to create a cohesive Spanish colonial revival look for the city's downtown. And Santa Barbara's Chinese population was deeply affected by this change And whereas Judge Itsushi Wallace Tashima, born in Santa Maria is the first Japanese American and the third Asian American in history to serve on the U.S.
Court of Appeals. And whereas the AAPI community has continuously faced discrimination since the COVID-19 pandemic And communities across the U.S. have experienced an escalation of hate including harassment, threats and violence and increased fear and tension are being experienced by Palestinian, Muslim, Arab and Jewish Americans. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors declares May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month in Santa Barbara County And calls all residents of our community to help bring awareness to issues affecting the AAPI community and celebrate the many contributions of their community members passed and adopted today.
So Chairman Lavinino and members of the board Thank you for your recognition of May as AAPI Heritage Month. This is the fourth year that the Santa Barbara AAPI Solidarity Network has been involved in this as part of our goal of increasing the visibility of the AAPI community here. In 2021, we came to the podium in the shadow of many attacks against AAPIs, particularly women and our elders.
And in 2023, we came following the Monterey Park and Half Moon Bay incidents But the perpetrators in those incidents were our elderly AAPI. And to me it felt like a fable come to life that the lesson was that it is hate and violence that we have to fight because we can all become perpetrators at some point. In our rejection of violence, it is not only from ourselves and from individuals but from our institutions and nations as well.
Heritage Months are a way to remind each other of our shared humanity, our accomplishments, and our resilience. It's an opportunity to learn about ourselves, each other, and our nation's history. And this year, I'm deeply grateful to the Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors and the Fund for Santa Barbara for awarding our network a grant from the Racial Equity Fund so we can share some of Santa Barbara's history from the 1925 earthquake era as well as have an opportunity to celebrate the Lunar New Year which was celebrated here even back in the 19th century.
So thank you all very much. And I also just want to note that last year when we highlighted Supervisor Gloria Ochoa's groundbreaking representation of the First District. And so this year, we're highlighting the Fifth District with the birth of Judge Atsushi Wallace Tashima in Santa Maria And he was the first Japanese-American and third Asian American in history to serve on a U.S. Court of Appeals.
So catch these, the other districts next time. I do also want to share that the Santa Barbara County Genealogical Society's exhibit on local Asian American families which covers a period from 1870 to 1970 has just gone live on their website And you can just go to sbgen.org and then look for in the community and then society exhibits, and you can also find their local African-American community stories, Jewish American community stories. This is a project that's ongoing that they just started during the pandemic And I will also mention that I recognize that we share this month with Jewish American Heritage Month.
And anyway, I want to just now introduce a couple of members of our network who will share other ways that people can be active with our AAPI community.
0:34 – 0:405 turns
Hello, my name is Randall Royce Ramos. I use he, they pronouns and I am this year's UCSB Filipino Culture Night Executive Coordinator. We're very happy with the resolution of proclaiming May as an Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month. May also happens to be the month where many universities and Asian American organizations across the nation hold their cultural nights to spread cultural awareness, and heritage.
And this month of May we happen to have three Asian American Culture Nights lined up with Vietnamese Culture Night, Nikkei Student Union, and our own very Filipino culture night. The purpose of Filipino Culture Night is to showcase the culture of the Philippines while giving students the opportunity to network develop new skills and become part of a close-knit community PCN strives to present a collaborative piece of art and culture that is meant to convey and highlight issues and values that are not only prominent within Filipino culture but spread a message that can transcend cultural and ethnic boundaries.
On behalf of all of our Culture Knights at the university level, at University of California Santa Barbara we're very happy again and thank the Board of Supervisors for the resolution. Thank you
Good morning, my name is Therese Chin. Thank you again for continuing to recognize the contributions of the AAPI community and the local people. So 15 years ago under the Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation we formulated the Asian American Affinity Group and we are pleased to say that it's been 15 years we are going to be showcasing the Asian American Film Series in July and the Asian American Neighborhood Festival in October So, our community is so welcoming of these events that for 15 years we have people just asking when this is going to happen. And this shows us that this community supports all of the contributions of the shared history and our contributions to everywhere. Additionally I'm also one of the committee members of the Asian American Association of Santa Barbara County where we bring people together and make connections and share our history and our culture, but we invite everyone.
So thank you again so much for this recognition of all of our efforts. Thank you. That's it. Thank you.
Madam Clerk, Item 5.
I just wanted to say thank you to all of you for your work to celebrate Asian American history, the good and bad. Remembrance is so important. I feel like remembrance is important both to know the progress that we made, the healing that can take place. My grandfather was someone who accepted healing, and I think he survived because he accepted healing. He was a POW for four years in a Japanese POW camp. He was an Indonesian, a sailor in the Royal Dutch Navy, a segregated navy.
And you know his like many Families of immigrants, our story. Our Asian American history story is tied up with world history. He was after the allies lost the battle of the Java Sea in 1942 they tried to escape encirclement right? And it was a segregated Navy so the Dutch officers decided they got all the rations And the Indonesian sailors starved. My grandfather was so matter of fact about it, I wrote this down.
He said, I wasn't a white boy. I was a colored boy and so that's the way it was. How much has changed just in three people's lifetimes? I think that's pretty amazing. He also had a good sense of humor. He said, needless to say the food got better when we were put in the POW camp. So I think remembrance is also important because as was alluded to today I'm not sure that discrimination is on the rise, but people acting on it is according to the numbers. There is rising tide of violence that could drag us back into a darker age and remembrance is an important defense from that darker age. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Item
A5 please?
0:40 – 0:442 turns
Chair Labanino, members of the Board, Administrative Item No. 5 is sponsored by Supervisor Caps. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2024 as National Bike Month and honoring MOVE Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Heather Deutsch, Executive Director of MOVE Santa Barbara County. If you'll please make your way to the podium I will read the resolution into the record.
Whereas National Bike Month has been celebrated in May for over five decades, and the bicycle is a sustainable and eco-friendly mode of transportation as well as an enjoyable recreational activity. And whereas community members will partake in various bicycling activities throughout May including educational programs, races, community events, trail maintenance efforts, helmet advocacy, charitable initiatives, and leisurely rides. And whereas Santa Barbara County's scenic beautiful diverse terrain Attract numerous cyclists each year, contributing to the local economy and promoting health and wellness among residents and tourists alike. And whereas supporting the bicycle-friendly community fosters improved public health, community cohesion, and road safety, reduces pollution and traffic congestion, and provides alternative methods of transportation for those who do not have access to a car or do not drive.
And whereas MOVE Santa Barbara teaches nearly 5,000 youth annually how to ride and safety skills contributing to the promotion of bike safety and awareness. And whereas various organizations within Santa Barbara County including MOVE Santa Barbara County are dedicated to promoting bicycle safety and awareness during the month of May and beyond. And whereas the state of California has recognized the importance of bicycling by designating May as Bike Month and endorsing the third week of May as Bike-To-Work Week Now, therefore be it resolved that this Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim May 2024 as National Bike Month in Santa Barbara County and recognizes and celebrates moves.
Santa Barbara County for its work in promoting bicycle safety and awareness, particularly for its efforts in teaching approximately 5000 youth annually how to ride and providing them with essential safety skills to ensure equitable access to safe transportation options for all residents during national bike month and beyond past and adopted today.
So thank you so much. We at MOVE Santa Barbara County are super excited to be recognized for this honor. We are here on behalf of the tens of thousands of people throughout the county who ride their bikes because it's joyous, but also for the tens of thousands who rely on bicycling for their everyday needs. Whether this be getting to work, getting their kids to school you know going to parks and so it's really really important that we honor the interest that people have in this very very important mode of transportation. We also focus on walking biking and public transportation.
And we do this because all together they have tremendous benefits for our county. So for example, they do not produce any greenhouse gas emissions. So transportation is the number one source of greenhouse gas emissions in Santa Barbara County and it's something that we need to address. It's also tremendously cheaper for our individual residents. Owning a car costs approximately $12,000 a year so we think it's really important that people have the option to be able to safely bicycle to where they need to go It is great for physical and mental health, and especially after the pandemic this is particularly important to address these especially with our youth.
It is cheaper for our county. It's cheaper to build infrastructure for biking and it's cheaper to maintain infrastructure for biking. And it also moves a lot more people in a lot less space. And we know that traffic congestion is a major issue in our county and this is an amazing way to address it, as well as the fact that you can park ten bicycles in one vehicle parking space. So when we talk about housing and our need to bring more housing for residents here We need to think about the way that space is used and how we're going to get people around. So, we are here to support Biking Joy but we're also here to support all of the wonderful benefits that biking brings to the county as well. Thank you.
0:45 – 0:506 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Administrative item number six is sponsored by Supervisor Caps. It is to adopt a resolution honoring dignity moves for the opening of La Posada in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Erin Edelheit. On April 2022, 2024, La Posada opened its doors to over 80 people experiencing homelessness in the South County Santa Barbara. And whereas, La Posada is an innovative shelter in partnership with Dignity Moves, Good Samaritan Shelter, Santa Barbara County and generous philanthropic supporters. And whereas, La Posada means shelter. With this project it also means dignity, help and hope for its residents. Because La Posada means dignity, this program means residents are offered the dignity of what most of us take for granted.
Their own space with four walls a door that locks and a place to store their belongings and on-site support. And whereas La Posada means help because of the compassionate one-on-one wraparound services for residents to utilize. And whereas La Posada means hope for a lifeline it will provide our I just want to say how
How honored I am and how much pride I feel to be a part of this community, because this resolution is really to the magic of Santa Barbara. And I really want to pay tribute to the Board of Supervisors and everyone in the county government, because none of this would have been possible without your leadership and without the hard work of so many people behind the scenes Santa Barbara County, despite a tremendous shortage of land and despite counties and cities throughout California and our country struggling with the crisis of homelessness in two years have built 208 Tiny homes that include wraparound mental health case management, health services to the residents in partnership with philanthropy, with businesses, faith-based communities and volunteers.
And I think that we have shown not only the state, but our country on how it doesn't matter if you're Democrat or Republican. It doesn't matter how you feel, but what happens when a community comes together and works in one direction. And it's magic and it makes me filled with pride that I'm part of this community. And I thank you for this resolution But I really want to thank the Board of Supervisors, because you're showing a model of leadership that I think can be emulated everywhere in California and everywhere in our country. So thank you.
Thank you. I wanted to bring this resolution forward In addition to all of the good things between Good Samaritan and this board's commitment and our county's commitment, the speed by which this is happening. The fact that I feel like it was just yesterday that we were still working with the public to try to explain what this would be and get this vote passed and the funding et cetera but here we are. And I believe I'm correct Aaron that 30 some folks have already moved in which is just... Yeah 13 weeks Yeah so 35 people and I can tell you, I know you my colleagues share the same out and about in the community. So many people are paying attention and honoring the actual tangible progress we're making on perhaps the hardest issue around which is homelessness and they'll say oh yeah I heard about La Posada How's it going and what a great concept.
And so just to give this little mini report with this resolution that tonight, 35 people will be sleeping indoors that were previously sleeping outdoors is a wonderful thing. So thanks everybody.
Yep, Supervisor Nelson and myself are looking for ways to, at Hope Village one of the things we found out is there's no nighttime activities. And so we're trying to build a bigger sense of community. So we're gonna be hosting a karaoke night. Yeah, yeah, so we're trying to think of new ways to try to build community there inside these small little communities. If it works?
Are you singing?
Heck no. We're trying to get people to go, not try to entertain people. Chair that seems right up your alley. It is. Trying to talk Bob into it wasn't easy but we're going to do it now actually he was I think might have been his idea but congratulations on La Posada. That's excellent. All right that takes us to item A7 Madam Clerk.
0:50 – 0:554 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board, Administrative Item No. 7 is sponsored by Supervisor Caps and Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2024 as Wildfire Community Preparedness Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Anthony Stornita, Deputy Chief of Emergency Operations. Whereas, May has been declared Wildfire Community Preparedness Month in Santa Barbara County. And whereas the threat of wildfire continues to be increasingly prevalent and dangerous and poses greater risk to people and property than ever before. And whereas Santa Barbara County has a well-documented history of wildfire risk which has increased in both probability and severity as a result of relatively recent drought conditions and climate change.
And whereas residents in the area with a potential for wildfires can take proactive measures to reduce the risk of injury and property loss by maintaining defensible space around their homes, and proactive action by single individual or entire neighborhood contributes to a safer more resilient and fire adapted community. And whereas Santa Barbara County Fire Department works closely with operational area partners to respond to and reduce the risk of wildland fires. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims May 2024 as Wildfire Community Preparedness Month and encourages everyone to participate in fire prevention and preparedness activities at home, work, school, and all locations marking the beginning of a year-long effort to improve wildfire awareness and safety passed and adopted today.
Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. Thank you for this resolution. Even though we're here accepting this today, this is a big partnership and collaboration amongst many stakeholders throughout the county, government agencies, county and private agencies as well. And I'm not going to try to recognize them all because I know I'll forget a key stakeholder somewhere along the way but Thank you for your empowerment and support to the district for all this, and the CEO's office for their support along the way as well. I don't know if any of you guys recognize but two days ago was a 15-year anniversary of the Jesusita Fire right here in our foothills. We lost 80 structures, 8700 acres in a matter of hours through a sundowner heavy wind driven fire.
And with that we're not gonna change the landscape or we're not gonna change the terrain, the topography, the wind That's all a constant and wildfire is still going to come through, but what we can change is the landscape. With our partnerships with the Fire Safe Council which has done a lot of work and then a lot of our government agencies and our op area agencies, we can change that. We can do some education, some outreach. We could make a difference. And going back to the core values of the county as the innovation is there's been a lot happened with the Fire Safe Council. We've done some mechanical chippening. We've done some grazing, targeted grazing which a lot of counties do not do We've done prescribed fire and with the Governor's Prescribed Fire Strategic Plan of 2021, we're putting beneficial fire back in the ground.
And just so you're aware Santa Barbara County was number one amongst all contract counties for good beneficial fire in Black Acres. So by far past most contract counties. Last year even brought in our tribal communities and burned with a chumash trying to bring that back So we're trying to be innovative and upfront. Something I want to thank you guys for as well is 2021 was AB 1103, the Ag Pass. We were the first county in the entire state to adopt the Ag Pass. There's now 18 counties and I would guarantee almost all of them use our template and all of our material we developed to develop their own. So moving forward I just want to thank you guys for this. There's some key websites out there, readysbc.org for our community look at that website you'll get evacuation alerts and then the fire safe council sbfiresafecouncil.org there's a workshop coming up on the 18th they're hosting it City College for wildfire evacuation and Supervisor Hartman I know you can add a lot more stuff on that Fire Safe Council as well but we appreciate it and we think all our community in our collaborators and stakeholders thank you.
Supervisor Hartman
Just briefly, we've got the top fire department in the whole country. They have had a lot of experience and they really are innovative and one of the innovations is to work so closely with the community because there are only so many people and so they need to partner with shared public safety And so in addition to attending the May 18th evacuation and survival workshop, people I encourage you to go to the Fire Safe Council website.
We've got a lot of vegetation and we all have to be engaged in clearing our roadsides and making defensible space around our homes that not only protects our property but it protects our firefighters. So, you know we never know what kind of season we're going to have so it's really critical to be prepared and now is the time to do it. Thank you.
0:55 – 0:596 turns
Madam Clerk item 8.
Chair Labanino, Members of the Board, Administrative Item No. 8 is sponsored by Supervisor Hirtman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming May 6th as National Nurses Day and the week of May 6, 2024 through May 12, 2024 as National Nurses Week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Kelly Berrigan, Ann Carlisle, Morena Lumas, Sergio Magdaleno-Garcia and Rachel Sherrick.
Whereas nurses are recognized for their contributions to the healthcare system, both in their role as expert clinicians in diverse care settings and as leaders who can dramatically influence the quality of care and overall performance of the healthcare system. And whereas the nursing profession plays an essential role in improving patient outcomes, increasing access, addressing health disparities, and achieving health equity. And whereas each day nurses step forward embracing new technologies Resolving emergency issues and accepting ever-changing roles in their profession. They lead the way for their patients, colleagues, organizations and healthcare industry as a whole. And whereas the Public Health Department nurses creatively and passionately balance daily workloads to ensure the continued provision of care of essential public healthcare services to vulnerable populations.
And whereas the theme for National Nurses Week 2024, nurses make the difference. Honors the incredible nurses who embody the spirit of compassion and care in every healthcare setting. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors does observe the sixth day of May as National Nurse's Day and the week of May 6th through May 12th as National Nurse's Week in recognition of the contribution of all nurses working in all of our healthcare and educational settings in the County of Santa Barbara passed and adopted today.
Good morning Chair Lavagnino, Supervisor Hartman and members of the Board. My name is Kelly Berrigan I'm the Director of the Maternal Child and Adolescent Health Program and Director of Public Health Nursing for the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department. I am joined today by nurse leaders from our Communicable Disease Control and Prevention program and Maternal Child and Adolescent Health program.
We would like to begin by first thanking you for acknowledging Nurses Week and the valuable contribution nurses make to the healthcare system. We also want to take this opportunity to say thank you to all of the nurses at the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department and in the community for their efforts aimed at health promotion, disease prevention, increasing access to care, and achieving health equity.
Nurses are recognized for their role as expert clinicians in diverse care settings and as leaders who can dramatically influence the quality of care and overall performance of health care systems. As the theme for National Nurses Week says, nurses make a difference. Thank you.
Supervisor Hartman?
Yeah, I just wanted to add my mother was a nurse decades ago and she was very active in the California Nurses Association because at that point the pay and the hours weren't very good. But now California does have a ratio of patients to nurses. The pay is better. The hours are better. The status is better. But we need more nurses and we have programs at both city colleges. So it's a wonderful profession, and I think we need to encourage more people to pursue it. And thank you all for the selfless service you perform.
Thank you. Item 9 please.
0:59 – 1:035 turns
Chair Lavinino, members of the board. Administrative item number nine is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino and Supervisor Kaps. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of May 2024 as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Tony Navarro and Pam Flint-Tambo. May 2024 is recognized as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County to enhance public awareness of mental health and dispel stigma around it. Whereas, mental health is an essential part of the overall well-being impacting individuals families and communities across Santa Barbara County whereas one in five American adults experiences a health a mental health condition each year and everyone faces challenges in life Thank you.
May is recognized nationally as Mental Health Awareness Month, providing an opportunity to raise awareness, combat stigma and promote mental health resources. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors wishes to enhance public awareness of mental health and recognizes May as Mental Health Month in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Thank you Chair Lavalinio and Supervisors. We appreciate being recognized, mental health is something that doesn't go away. I recently read a piece stated by President Kennedy in the early 60s when I was in college about how we were going to change how we serve people with mental health problems throughout our country. We're still working on it. And probably will be for a long time. But we're making progress and we appreciate the efforts of the county to address the needs of folks who have behavioral wellness issues in their lives.
Good morning Chair Lavanino and Supervisors and County staff. It's my privilege to stand up here on behalf of Be Well and thank you for recognizing May as Mental Health Awareness Month, and I also want to recognize general services. For the past two years Director Langerquist team has done a fabulous job of lighting up Santa Barbara County green in our light up green campaign that is sponsored by the national organization mental health America.
Each day we are highlighting a different county building that is lit up. Today on our social media I think it's the County of Battarabia building that is lit up green so I just want to say thank you to General Services, thank you to our county partners this is not just about B-Well we have actually We have about 24 contractors that provide 42 programs in this county and many of them are also lit up green across the county with us. Behavioral health and mental health awareness is critical as we move forward in this post-pandemic, and we're seeing just so many challenges not only our youth but our seniors in this county as well and everything in between. Very proud to be working promoting mental health awareness Creating new programs that meet the needs of our county each and every year.
And I just want to say for everyone listening, you know we have an access line. Our access lines serves about a thousand calls a month taking inquiries from folks who are asking about resources to help them address their mental health needs. So I want to also uplift that number publicly while I'm here with everyone and that number is 888-868-1649 and that's a 24 7 call in case anyone is interested or in need support for themselves or their loved ones in regard to behavioral health. Thank you.
Thank you. Supervisor Capps?
Yes, I just want to take the opportunity to thank the Be Well Commission chaired by Pam Tambo and you advocates are fierce and you hold us to account when it comes to mental health and doing better so thank you so much for your work.
1:03 – 1:083 turns
Item 10 please.
Chair Labanino, members of the Board, Administrative Item No. 10 is sponsored by Supervisor Labanino. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 5th, 2024 through May 11th, 2024 as National Correctional Officers Week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Sheriff Bill Brown, Undersheriff Craig Bonner, Chief Custody Deputy Vincent Wasilewski, Custody Commander Ryan Sullivan.
Whereas the week of May 5th through May 11th represents a period where correctional officers across the United States are recognized for their dedication and heroism to their local communities. And whereas, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office Custody Branch consists of the South County Main Jail Operations, Northern Branch Jail Operations, Resource Bureau, Health Services Bureau, Transportation Bureau Inmate Programs Bureau and the Special Operations Response Team. They are highly regarded professionals working in conjunction with other local criminal justice and public safety entities, and whereas 50 years ago the Sheriff's Office and this board recognized the need to create the sheriff's correctional officer rank structure that would best serve the duties of correctional officers specifically trained in the unique needs of detention facilities responsible for housing, security and transportation of all inmates incarcerated in Santa Barbara County who are awaiting trial.
Serving their short sentence and awaiting for their transfer to state prison. And whereas correctional officers reporting for duty in a 24-7 facility facing the demands of an ever increasing overcrowded jail system and the additional needs brought on by a nationwide public health safety While all, while the other maintaining order security and preserving the care custody and the dignity of those individuals charged with their care.
And whereas the citizens of Santa Barbara County can rest assured that these men and women are dedicated to their service and perform their duties professionally and ethically while displaying integrity courage and fairness thus ensuring the safety of their community, their fellow officers and incarcerated individuals Now, therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors recognizes the week of May 5th through 11th 2024 as National Correctional Officers Week and takes this opportunity to thank the men and women of Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office who have chosen the field of corrections as their service to our community passed and adopted today.
Good morning, Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I'm Sheriff Bill Brown and I'm joined here today by Under-Sheriff Craig Bonner, Chief Custody Deputy Vincent Waslewski. In the back we have Sergeant Justin Haney who's with our Classifications Department, Commander Kenny Callahan. We have Lieutenant Salim Salmada as I mentioned the under sheriff. We have newly minted Lieutenant Eric Alexander, who's with our Continuous Quality Assurance Unit. We have Alice Perez who is our Programs Manager and we have Bailey Fogata who is our WellPath Health Services Administrator.
This is National Corrections Officers Week that time of year that we pause to honor and thank all the hardworking men and women who staff our jail each and every day of the year And corrections is a difficult profession. Our custody staff deal with some rough customers who can at times be dishonest, defiant, disrespectful and on some occasions even physically aggressive but I'm proud to say that this behavior is constantly met with self-discipline, with compassion, with patience, with understanding and with courage by our custody staff They continue to give those who are incarcerated in our jails the tools that provide the opportunity to change their lives for the better, and many of them do so.
During their incarceration inmates will spend more time with our custody staff than they'll spend with their friends, their educators, their counselors, therapists, lawyers, even their families. The demeanor and the behavior that our custody staff model to our inmates is profoundly positive and even inspirational. Our county and our society are better off as a result of the remarkable care and service that they provide to those who are in our custody.
So on behalf of all of us in the Sheriff's Office, and all of you, thank you for this recognition. And I want to thank each and every one of our custody staff members for their consistent professionalism and their dedication to duty We appreciate them and all that they do. Thank you.
1:08 – 1:102 turns
Well, I just wanted to add one other stabilizing force for society that correctional officers provide and that is for their children. I was not a child of a correctional officer but I spent a year in the household. Mike Stevenson was one of our CO's his son and I remain best friends but I lived in their household and the first time I ever saw In my neighborhood, a house where the refrigerator was full that the family sat together for dinner.
That there was enough resources for the kids and enough time was because of the stabilizing influence of Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office Correctional Officer position on their, for their kids I thought I had walked into a TV show because I didn't know people actually did any of those things. So, I just want to tell you that it makes a difference not only for society but for the children and I think it's just important to remember that even though the crazy hours and the hard work that it still makes a difference for those kids
Thank you. And one of those jobs I think we probably all take for granted, but thank God that there's still people that are looking at that as a career. Obviously we need more of them, but not something that I know I have the physical or mental makeup to do and I know it can be a real grind on your family in your own mental health. So we do appreciate immensely the job that you do, so thank you very much.
All right, that takes us to our last resolution which is A11. Madam Clerk?
1:10 – 1:142 turns
Chair Lavanino and members of the Board, Administrative Item 11 is sponsored by Supervisor Lavanino. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of May 5th, 2024 through May 11th, 2024 as Compost Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Bob Engel. Whereas compost improves soil structure, reduces runoff and enables amended soils to use less water. And whereas using sustainable soil and rinsing compost helps prevent erosion of topsoil without depleting valuable wildlife habitats. And whereas returning compost Organic resources to the soil is a method of decreasing dependence on chemical fertilizers and non-point pollution. And whereas sustainability is enhanced by composting green waste, biosolids and other organic materials.
And whereas organic materials suitable for composting represent up to 70% of the materials that could be landfilled each year. And whereas the County of Santa Barbara has initiated green waste collection programs with their franchise haulers to aid in efforts of environmental sustainability. And whereas Engle and Gray's Regional Composting Facility in Santa Maria has been successfully composting organic material for sustainable agricultural practices since 1993, now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors proclaims the week of May 7th through May 13th 2024 as Compost Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Chair, fellow board members, thank you very much for recognizing Compost Awareness Week. We're celebrating in England Gray 31 years of composting. We're celebrating 78 years of business but 31 years of composting which is amazing. Somewhere around 2000-2001 I was at a conference and The Canadian people were there from the compost industry in Canada, and they talked about having a week. And so we got together at the United States Composting Foundation and started International Compost Awareness Week. I think I've been coming to the board meetings for about 20 years.
Quite an array of supervisors over that time. I missed one or two years in there but I tried to be pretty Positive about promoting compost and all the benefits that it does. Because one thing, it's recycling green waste and taking care of all that but the product that we manufacture is compost and it's fantastic for the environment. It heals the beach because it absorbs water, cleans runoff And does all that. So I really appreciate you taking advantage of this. We are also having a big event in Santa Maria at our yard on 745 West Bettoravia Road this Saturday from 10 to 1 we're giving complimentary compost to anybody up to a cubic yard And so we get all kinds of people. We even got last year a guy came up with a bike and he had a trailer on the bike, and he took about half a yard of compost off in his trailer that was behind the bike.
So I've covered a couple of proclamations. But anyway, appreciate you recognizing us. And please try to use compost. Thank you very much.
1:14 – 1:244 turns
All right. We'll now take up the administrative items pulled in numerical order. Madam Clerk, can you please read items? We're gonna group these. Items 13, 14, 15 and 16 if you'll read them all into the record we have one public speaker will grant her eight minutes to deal with all of these so 13, 14, 15 and 16 please.
Yes, Chair Lovenino and members of the board. Administrative item number 13 is from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding a First Amendment to the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor with Marrakee Allos for fiscal year 2021 through 2024 for mental health services and termination of the 2021 through 2024 agreement.
Administrative item number 14 is also from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding California Mental Health Services Authority, CalMHSA and California Department of State Hospitals DSH purchase of state hospital beds memorandum of understanding MOU fiscal year 2023 through 2025 and CalMHSA state hospital beds administrative fee participation agreement for fiscal years 2023 through 2025 Additionally, Administrative Item Number 15 is from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding proposed amendments to the Santa Barbara County Behavioral Wellness Commission bylaws and lastly, Administrative Item 16 is from the Behavior Wellness Department and it is to consider recommendations regarding a fiscal year 2022 through 2029 program funding agreement with Horn LLP for the Community Care Expansion Preservation Program, CCEPP And we have a request from the public, Denise L.
Amin on Zoom for all three of these items. Denise?
Hi can you hear me? Yes we can Denise please proceed. My name is Denise Ellamy. I'm not sure if you can see me, you must just can hear me. Um, my name is Denise Ellamy. I am a commissioner on the Wellness Behavior Commission. Thank you so much Joan Hartman for, um, Allowing me to serve as a commissioner on this board. I believe that, um, this board needs some diversity and I bring that to this board and I appreciate you Joan for allowing me to do that.
I have been on this board for over a year now and I am Thinking about the budget, I want to know more about the budget. And these proposals here are amendments if you want to call them amendments or to increase a contract. I have a problem when we make contracts with People for seven, 10 to seven years for a certain dollar amount. And after a year or two the contractor comes back and they need more money. And this is what we're doing where I'm changing the agreement that we made back in 2020 or 2021 and we're increasing the money.
The amount that we're going to give this vendor, the same vendor by By a million, or it looks like almost $2 million. And nothing stops this vendor from coming back next year and we doing another amendment to increase this budget. So I'm a taxpayer. And I see the prison system and the mental health centers, we only have 16 beds. I do see that there... Well, I'll talk about 13 first.
We only have 16 beds for this county, but we have ample amount of administrators and we have a lot of contractors. But we don't have any physical bids so I feel personally that we need to do more to help Um, the, um, the behavioral wellness department. Our budget should be structured more for beds than, um, for, um contractors and increasing their money because once you increase the contractor's budgets then, um the people who need the services it automatically decreases What they're going to get. So basically, when you have a budget if the top gets all of the money then the people that need it doesn't dribble down to them and I'm here.
Because I feel that we need to change this structure and give the people who need it the majority of the money, and let them trickle down money trickle down to the staff and to the contractors. That's 813. 814 is basically the same thing, where they're saying that we're going to consider paying more an administrator fee and when it is an administrator fee that means it doesn't go toward getting one more bed or getting one more thing. It's just another person Um, helping out the director or whomever to decide where the money should go and it never gets to the beds. But I'm hoping that this recommendation of the new beds nine And then nine and 16, I guess would be 25 for the County of Santa Barbara. I guess that would be a big increase. I'm hoping that the money that is allotted to do that at the end of this date June 30th 2025 that we have nine beds and not another Contractor asking for more money.
It's a vicious cycle, and I just want to say that it would be nice if we could stop this vicious cycle of contractors being contracted and then raising their price. There's no need to have a contract if it's no good next year and we want more money. I don't, I'm not understanding that part of this board. And like I said, I pay taxes. I've been here over 10 years and my money, I would like it to go directly to the people in need. Maybe you want your money to go to the contractors but my money if I can designate where it goes, I would like it to go to the people that need it.
Um, I work, um, like I said, I'm on the wellness behavior. Tony Navarro is doing a great job. I appreciate her. Um, I ran for the chair of it and obviously I didn't win. And I am here to assist the chair and the assistant chair on the wellness behavior department. And we'll start coming to these meetings. Because I really think that, um, my, our voices should be heard. We're not represented on the boards. Um, that's the BIPOC community.
Um, but we're over-represented in the prisons and it's not fair and we know it's not fair and it has to change. And the last one would be the A 15 and this to change the bylaws. Those are the ones that whenever you get someone, something comes different, that's what happens. The bylaws change so that you don't have to come to the Board of Supervisors at the... You can just change the contract and pay more money to this person without having to bring it to the public.
It's less transparency and I don't think that it should be passed because we need transparency. If you want to take my taxpayer money, I think I have the right to know where you're allocating my tax payer money to or where you're taking it from Are what you're doing with it. And I don't think that, um, by changing the bylaws to give a person more authority, um, to move more money without transparency is the right thing to do.
So thank you very much. I listened to all of the, um... The supervisors today, your resolutions were very beautiful and I want you to thank each one of you guys for everything that you do. And I'm just hoping that you consider the BIPOC community and help us out. Thank you very much.
Thank you Denise. Okay next item is Item 21. Madam Clerk please read that into the record.
1:24 – 1:3310 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Administrative item 21 is sponsored by the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding authorizing the examination of Citibus Advisors Inc., of sales and transactions and use of tax records for proposed wine business improvement districts. We will begin here with Steve Pepe to be followed via Zoom by Tim Schneider
Morning. Good morning, Chairman Labanino and Supervisors. I'm Steve Pepe of Clopepi Vineyards. We purchased our property in 1994 and I'm also a founding member of the Santa Rita Hills Wine Growers Alliance. I am also speaking in opposition on behalf of Flying Goat Winery, Amplose Winery, Loring Wine Company, and the Babcock Winery. This is not a minor administrative matter. You are setting in motion a course of action which will have significant legal and monetary consequences to the county.
You need to be clear-eyed about the risk you are undertaking. The Wine Preserve is a re-bottling of the Vintners 2020 wine bid that was opposed by most small wineries. The Lompoc City Council passed the unanimous resolution opposing the 2020 wine bid. They also stated, as they're entitled to under the statute, that they would refuse to create a wine bid within the jurisdiction of the city of Lompoc. The Howard Jarvis folks sent a letter to the Santa Barbara County Council advising them that the wine bid was an illegal because, among other things, it is a tax requiring a two-thirds vote.
There is no reported case approving a wine bid. Business Improvement District, there are two lawsuits that were filed which have been settled. After this the Vintners withdrew the wine bid in 2020. The 2020 defects for the wine bid still exist in the Wine Preserve. The Vintner's website states there are 350 plus wineries in Santa Barbara County Yet, they only represent 96. Only 96 or 28% belong to the Vintners. 254 wineries, or 72%, have voted with their feet not to be represented by the Vintners. The Wine Preserve will force them to pay 1% of their sales to the Vintners who they don't want to be members of.
The Santa Rita Hills Wine Alliance was created in 2000. It has 51 members, and the Vintners met with the Santa Rita Hills Wine Alliance, offered to share some of the wine fees and tax but nevertheless, the Santa Rita Wine Alliance refused to do it. and support the wine preserve. The wine preserve will kill the Santa Rita Hills Wine Alliance. Small wineries cannot afford to pay twice, large winery CFOs will not pay a voluntary payment and then a second double payment because of the tax.
The Board of Supervisors should schedule this for a public hearing so the other 256 wineries or 72% not represented by the Vintners may be heard. The Board of Supervisors should request a written opinion from the County Council that this bid is lawful. It makes no sense to proceed with an unlawful item. You also need a mutual defense, hold harmless and indemnification agreement with the Vintners so that when the case gets litigated and you lose, you're not going to be on the hook for the damages or your legal costs. And we also object at this stage to giving to Civitas which is the sales organization confidential tax
information. Mr. Pepper, that is your time.
Thank you.
We will now move to Tim Snyder via Zoom.
Thank you. Can you hear?
Yes, we can please proceed.
Thank you for having me. My name is Tim Snyder I'm the president of Fess Parker Winery. I'm also the current president of the Board of Directors for Santa Barbara Vintners Association it's a pleasure to be with you here today. I would like to speak in support of the wine preserve initiative The Santa Barbara Vintners Association and the board are advocating for the implementation of this structure in order to keep our region and our wine community competitive vis-a-vis the other regions throughout the state of California with respect to the ability to promote ourselves, and also with respect to advocacy.
The bids that we're talking about, the wine preserve would mimic are being implemented now throughout the state of California in different regions. Temecula has implemented a bid. Paso Robles will shortly it's in motion and has great support there Monterey also is in process and we believe, and they believe they will soon pass this funding mechanism for their association.
In order for us again to remain competitive as a region beyond just the Vintners Association it's really imperative that we figure out how we have Safe, stable consistent funding mechanisms. And we believe that this is becoming an industry standard and we ask that it gets support to the next phase. Obviously Santa Barbara wine industry contributes significantly to the overall greater good of the county financially and otherwise And this actually does have great support among the Vintners, contrary to what Mr. Pepe was saying. We've had many discussions beyond Vintner's members only and there is quite a bit of support for this enough to at least move this forward and essentially get it to a vote. With respect to the legality, the wine preserve will be set up to mirror the same structures that currently exist and benefit the county today with Visit Santa Barbara, Visit Santa Ynez Valley.
And then currently as I mentioned in the wine industry with the Temecula Wine Association. All of these are functioning all of these work Our structure will be the same. So I take issue with the legality argument, I think there's more to that than essentially is being presented by Mr. Pape and others. In closing, I'll say this. I think there are many founding families of Santa Barbara wine country. My family, the Parker family, the families behind Foxen, Melville.
Mr. Snyder. I'm sorry to interrupt you but that is your time. Thank you very much. Thank you. Supervisor Nelson?
Yes thank you Chair Lavagnino. I guess my question is for staff exactly where we're at in this process Will there be an additional opportunity for this board to fully vet this? At this point, it seems like we're asking for information to go a little further and not making a determination on whether this board would ultimately support that going to a vote. At this point I'm agnostic and open to getting more information from both sides as this moves forward.
You know, I do understand that we don't necessarily want the minority rights of people that might be small guys You know, overrun by those that are bigger but at the same time there's value that potentially could be derived from this that I'm interested in as well. So I just want to better understand this process and when will we get to have a more thorough vetting of this concept?
1:33 – 1:3611 turns
CEO Miyasato.
Supervisors to the Chair, just as far as Supervisor Nelson is correct all we're asking you today is to approve this, the resolution that was required for us to then submit confidential tax information to a third party so that the organization can look at the feasibility but we do have Allison here if you want to have a better understanding of the process. Yes please.
Thank you. This is the first step to receive the data so that we will be able to determine if we even have a majority interest in this. The process and the law requires that we have more than 51% economic support of our industry We are not able to determine that on our own. So the request before you is to allow Civitas, a third party, to collect the data from the county, hold it confidential and then assess for the county when the time comes whether or not the wine industry has a 51% majority interest in this process.
Through this, we will create a management district plan which will come back before you and that will lay out the details of the proposed district. So there will be ample time for both sides to discuss it and explain their position. This is the first step so that we can even move forward in the process. I'm happy to answer any other questions.
Supervisor Williams?
Yes so there's a required action step on page 4 of the report. What action are we taking today on that?
I believe the action is to approve A resolution that will allow Civitas to work with HDL, which is your consulting firm that holds the sales tax data for the County of Santa Barbara.
So it's step zero.
It's step zero, exactly.
We cannot move forward without this. Including two Board of Supervisors hearings that we would have to ratify? Is that my understanding?
Yes. So there will be more opportunity to hear and weigh in on this. This is the first step so that we can even begin to move forward with the formation
Okay all right thank you very much. That takes us to item A43.
1:36 – 1:417 turns
Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. Administrative item 43 is from the Sheriff Coroner's Office and the Probation Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Sixth Amendment to the agreement with California Forensic Medical Group for the provision of medical and mental health services. It looks like we have three requests to speak excuse me two requests to speak. We will begin here with Maureen Earles
Good morning Supervisors. Our CLU League of Women Voters workgroup is very concerned about the proposed delay in the negotiations for a renewed WellPath contract due last month. Extending its current contract continues an unacceptable and harmful level of WellPath medical and mental health care. We need an improved contract now. We need contractual consequences for the lack of immediate compliance corrections reported in the latest behavior wellness well path monitoring report using performance measures and court ordered compliance standards.
You have evidence in the latest second quarter WellPath monitoring report of the danger of deaths and or harm to people in our jail due to failed compliance. Of the four sections reported on, the crisis services section results are most alarming. WellPath failed four of the six performance compliance measures in that report. One, in measuring safety cell reassessment safety watch of the required 30 logs to be reviewed only 11 were provided by WellPath and the majority of those logs were not compliant with the checks every four hours.
Number two, for safety cell mental health and suicide risk assessments required for every individual. Most were not completed. Number three, for safety cell treatment plan and behavior management plan required for each inmate. Most inmates did not have a complete plan. Number four, for safety cell inmate post-suicide watch requiring clinical follow up and assessment within 24 hours and then five days. Some follow ups not scheduled some scheduled but not completed and some unclear.
Therefore after three years of the lack of full compliance with a remedial plan The Murray case federal experts recommendations and the first quarter this year behavior monitoring report. We need to start now first requiring well path compliance corrections be implemented this month Two, secondly we need a short renewal contract deadline. And three the renewed contract must include full compliance required with these performance standards financial consequences for failed compliance and reallocation of well past funding to county as needed to implement corrective action Continuous WellPath contract renewal delays are not acceptable to us, nor we assume acceptable to the lawyers in the federal lawsuit. People have a right to be safe in our jails and the county has a responsibility to protect them.
Thank you, Maureen.
We will now move on to Gail Orsoranco.
We are here today not to prevent you from approving the sixth amendment to the agreement with WellPath but to ask you to emphasize how important it is to get a better contract. One that not only imposes penalties for non-compliance But enables the county to actually collect the penalties when services that are required under the contract are not Actually performed or staff isn't There we've waited for years to see the medical and mental health services in the jails meet the requirements of the court ordered remedial plan in the Murray case that disability rights case.
And we're here basically to see that this contract gets done and it gets done right. It's a critical step We don't want to be back here in June with another extension, and we're hoping for a really good Contract that will achieve compliance with the remedial plan Thank You
Thank you supervisor caps
Yeah, thank you to our advocates. I pulled this because again just share your concern and alarm that this contract which has been problematic is a mild word so I was just you know I know that we have to approve the extension otherwise will be out of compliance which would then create a whole nother host of issues compounded on the existing one so I was hoping the sheriff could speak What's happening next? June 30th is around the corner with this contract and how do we get back on track to make sure we're doing right by our inmates.
Thank you.
1:42 – 1:4613 turns
Good morning, Supervisor Caput to the Chair. Custody Commander Ryan Sullivan on behalf of the Sheriff's Office. I also have Deputy Director Damon Fletcher from probation here as well if there are any questions specific to probation side but as far as contract negotiations are concerned we've had exactly 50 negotiation meetings by my count those include negotiation meetings with WellPath as well as with our county partners internally including probation, be well, public health and the CEO's office.
We are trying very diligently to address all the concerns that the community has brought forth, that your board has brought forth as well as concerns that the grand jury has brought forth. And these are really difficult I would say difficult but they're really very complex negotiations this is a complex contract worth a lot of money that the county spends a lot of money on for very important services in the jail to our clients and our incarcerated people.
But we anticipate bringing the contract back to your board before June 30th, and our goal is to address those concerns that we've heard and that have been voiced in the community meeting as well as Board of Supervisors meetings and other sessions that we've been a part
Thank you, and a follow-on question since you raised the grand jury which I appreciate. Is there a date set for that response? And would the two things go together at all as we approve a new contract and hear your response to the grand jury's findings?
I do believe we have 60 days to respond to the grand jury report. I don't recall the exact date it was issued but that will be coming back to your board relatively soon.
The more we can align the two things so that when we're looking at a new contract, we can also be addressing the concerns by the grand jury report would be helpful to us as a board. Thank you.
Supervisor Williams?
I just want to make sure also the taxpayers get what they're paying for. And you know, I know that's a concern of all yours and obviously that has a direct nexus with inmate health as well. You know when this comes back June 30th will the contract address a meaningful incentive for staffing? or a financial payback so that we can look at an alternative way to staff if they are unable
to do so. Supervisor Williams, I don't think I can speak to specifics on what the contract will come back to your board with but I will say that those have been taken into consideration and we have been trying to work through those as an internal group and brought those to the table as discussion points.
Yeah, I just wanna make sure that I am alarmed enough about this issue that the downside of being out of compliance is starting to look less bad than continuing with the status quo. So just hope that we can resolve that with WellPath in a way that meaningfully addresses that issue.
OK, thank you very much. OK so that leaves us with needing to approve items I have it here somewhere 13 14 15 16 21 and 43.
So moved
move by Supervisor Hartman
second
second by Supervisor Williams all those in favor aye any opposed passes unanimously And do we need a five-minute break? Are you ready to keep going? Ready to go. All right, let's at least get through item couple of these early quick items madam. Oh! We do have public comment that's right can't forget public comment all right so this is the time for public comment this is for items not on today's agenda Madam Clerk are there any requests to speak from the public
1:46 – 1:5734 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board we do have five requests to speak this morning. We will begin here with Maya Scoop-Rutten to be followed by Mark Preston
Thank you for the opportunity. I have some serious concern about the health department. I have a business in town, Chocolate Maya and we've been here 18 years. The health department usually comes every year to inspect us. We haven't seen any for two years. I've conducted a little investigation myself Asked different restaurants if they have seen anybody, and they have not.
So I'm very worried about it. I also get... I'm sorry, I'm a little nervous. Don't
worry about
it, we're good. I paid my dues in November for my permits, and usually you get your permits in a couple three weeks. I have not received it. I have called the health department to see what was going on. No answer. Now, I'm getting threatening letters from Sacramento telling me that I'm not legal. I haven't paid my dues. Yeah, I am very worried especially for the restaurants in Santa Barbara going out to dinner knowing what happens in kitchens if they're not inspected. Yeah, I am very worried about it.
Supervisor Hartman.
I noticed that our Director of Environmental Health is here and wonder if you would like to comment or at least meet with the woman outside the hearing room?
He nodded in the affirmative so, to a meeting.
And I also wanted to thank the opportunity with a special day coming up to get ethically sourced chocolate from Maya.
All right. Hopefully it tastes better. It does. Ethical chocolate tastes a lot better. Next speaker, please.
We will continue with Mark Preston to be followed by Karen Hallenstein.
Good morning. My name is Mark Preston. I represent myself and I live in Goleta. Thank you for your service. Thank you for being here. Budget time is busy, so I'm asking you to agendize an item in July two months from now. Get through the budget. It's a hard time for everybody. The Cortese-Knox legislation was designed to protect counties from revenue damage due to the incorporation of municipalities.
The Revenue Neutrality Agreements, the RNAs are the mechanism to assure that neutrality I am not asking for you to amend the Goleta RNA. At this time, I am not. I'm asking you to agendize the fiscal analysis of the current offset between Goleta and the county for common expenses. There's a number out there that the county spends It has not been done since 2014. Nobody knows what that offset is, and that offset needs to be understood to see if there's anything that can be improved going forward.
So that's my story. Please advise any questions. I'm gonna follow up my comment today with an email You're clear on what I'm saying. But the request in summary, agenda item fiscal analysis of the offset between county and city expenses that are common to both. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
I got a minute left. That's good.
Karen Hallenstein to be followed by Diana Sandoval
Looks like Ms. Helmstein stepped away, she was here earlier.
Then we will move on to Diana Sandoval.
May I make a quick announcement? So I did find a wedding ring in the women's bathroom.
Okay, we'll give it to the clerk. Somebody is missing a wedding ring. Oh, we found it!
Okay. All right,
thank you.
It has not been claimed yet just so everyone
knows. Okay it has not been
claimed.
Can
we start? Hold on Diana we're gonna start your time over that was a public service announcement thank you for that all
right
go
ahead Dear Chair, members of the Board. I am Diana Sandoval and I'm in the First District. I'm here for the fourth time to discuss the unsafe bridge that Building and Safety allowed to be rebuilt without permits on my property and appears to be actively justifying this course of action. In 2017 someone fell through the bridge. My property was held liable even though my property doesn't use a bridge. It's a service entrance for a private polo estate but because I'm the majority owner and it's on my property I'm legally responsible Since I spoke on Friday, Inspector Carl Lindbergh, Building Official Craig Johnson and the County Structural Engineer conducted a site inspection of the deficient abutments. However, the video recording raises serious concerns.
Inspector Lindbergh asks the neighbor, have you figured out how you're going to do the screening? To me, this suggests a predetermined outcome from the inspector rather than a fair and impartial review of the abutments or of my appeal over the counter permit number 24CNP-00475. I believe Inspector Lindbergh's actions demonstrate bias and failure to fulfill his duties. Here are some troubling examples. In an email to the building official, the inspector is not honest and says I own one third of the bridge and that because the bridge is near my driveway, I do not like it. The truth is, the bridge is two-thirds of my property. The bridge is not safe and my property's liable for the subpar repairs the county's allowing.
Over the course of a year in five different email instances Inspector Lindbergh attempts to have his supervisors sign off on abating the violation and circumventing the county's determination of permits and to authorize the bridge for pedestrian light utility use on behalf of the neighbor's agent as the inspector states in one of the emails that agent describes the situation better than I Can, but we'll try anyways. The truth is the bridge was red tagged by his supervisor Kevin Green. The in-house review was completed by the county structural engineer and despite all of this, the violation was abated without permits or even a site visit because a neighbor's agent who doesn't work for the county can explain things better.
In the email, the building official states we need to be careful we're not giving approval for someone to construct something on a portion of the property they may not own or do not have legal access but gives approval to continue rebuilding without permits on a red tag. The truth is the inspector did not perform his duties and allowed the encroachment of the bridge to be rebuilt on my property outside of the easement. Let me repeat, on my property outside of the easement.
To list off a few other inaccuracies with Inspector Lindbergh, there are incorrect cap dates and correct timelines amidst the in-house review and timelines. Missing emails from the public records request, misleads his supervisors multiple times, and biasly skewed things in favor of the neighbor and the agent. Inspector Lindbergh falsely claimed there were no updates when I emailed in October. All the while he was actively working with the agent to circumvent the permitting process per the cap notes.
During a public comment to the Planning Commission, I was advised to seek legal counsel. This shouldn't be necessary if building safety fulfilled its duties. While we have retained legal counsel, I just want to ensure we pursue every avenue before moving forward against the county. I urge you to consider all avenues for swift and just resolution. My hope is that the Board of Supervisors will act with support and not silence.
Thank you.
Thank You Diana
We will now move to Denise L. Amin via Zoom. Denise?
Hello, this is Denise L. Amin. I am coming to talk about transparency And our contracts, I'm not hearing any good things about. It feels like the contractors are in charge and we're just writing the checks out. I am here again for the BIPOC community. I feel that we should be represented on more boards and we're not. And I don't feel that anybody is representing us or trying to get that void filled Also with the District Attorney's Office, I have been a victim of a forged check by a board that I was on. They forged my name on a check. I filed a police report.
The police refused to file any charges. The district attorney refused to pick up the case. Me being a BIPOC person, I have no rights. There's nothing that I can do. But if you look at the jails here in Santa Barbara County, all of the people that looked like me and the BIPOC communities were in the jails. We make up the largest population in there but the smallest population in the county.
Why is this? Can someone help me with this? I'm just trying to get my case resolved. I'm a victim, but no one wants to help the BIPOC victim and I'm here to ask where do I go? Who do I call? Can I use some of my tax money to help me? I pay taxes. I paid lots of taxes to this county, and I should be able to get my tax money to help me when I am a victim. And I would appreciate if one of you supervisors will consider helping the BIPOC community with legal and within the prison systems by not authorizing contracts with contractors who are breaking the law.
Thank you very much. All
right, thank you. Are there any other requests to speak?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board that concludes general public comment.
Okay that concludes general public comment We'll now move to departmental item number one. Madam Clerk, can you read that into the record please?
1:57 – 2:0113 turns
Chair Labanino, members of the board. Departmental item number one is from the Planning and Development Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Stanford appeal case number 23 ALP 21 of the Montecito Planning Commission approval of the Music Academy of the West revised conditional use permit. Case numbers 21 RVP 109 and 21 CDP 129. This project is within the first district I would like to note for the record that there has been a request made from staff to withdraw this item from today's agenda.
Okay. There is a request for staff to withdraw this item, any questions from the board? Supervisor Nielsen?
Just a quick question, thank you Chair Labadino. So was this withdrawn by the staff, the applicant, the appellant and are we expecting to see this back in the future or is it gone-gone?
Mr. Chair and members of the board, so the item is being requested to be dropped by staff. We received an appeal letter that we were unaware of when we were docketing the board letters, so we realized we needed more time to address the items, and we do expect it to return once we've had a chance to respond to those items.
Do we have a timeframe?
I'm sorry, what was
that? I apologize. Do we have a time frame on when we expect it back this summer or?
We do not have a time frame at this point, I would say within the next couple of months. We're also working with the applicant team to see, I understand there's been some facilitation going on and so they may be addressing some of those items with the appellant team themselves. So there's still some items moving on this project.
Right, just want to make sure that my questions are not about any urgency, just curiosity. Thank you.
Any other questions? Is there a motion from the board?
Make the motion that we accept staff's recommendation to pull the item and bring it back at a later date. Withdrawal of the item from today's agenda?
I second.
Second, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Okay thank you very much and for our translator we're gonna take a 10-minute break we'll come back at 1115 for item number two Okay, we're going to reconvene this meeting on May 7th 2024. Madam Clerk can you please read item two into the record?
2:01 – 2:1714 turns
Chair Labadino members of the board departmental item number two is from the Sheriff Coroner's office it is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the renewal of the sheriff's office military equipment use ordinance
Good morning, Chair Labadino and Supervisors. Under Sheriff Craig Bonner here today representing the Sheriff's Office. So today we're here to do our annual update to the Board of Supervisors relating to the military equipment use policy and the resolution from the Board of Supervisors. And again, we've got Lieutenant Joe Schmidt, our training manager who will be doing the majority of the presentation today.
And again, just one of the things I want to put out right at the very beginning. Although this says military equipment quote-unquote, the reality is the vast majority of what we are talking about today is law enforcement equipment. There are a few items ie the helicopters and the MRAP that we use as a high water vehicle, that are in fact true military equipment. But by and large this is law enforcement equipment that we're talking about. And with that I'll turn it over to Lieutenant Schmidt.
Good morning Chair Lavineto and members of the board. I am Lieutenant Joe Schmidt of the Sheriff's Training Bureau. I'm here to request re-adoption of the Sheriff's Military Equipment Use Ordinance and Policy. Background, Assembly Bill 481 was signed by Governor Newsom on September 30th 2021 and made effective January 1st 2022. On May 17th 2022 the Board of Supervisors approved the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Military Equipment Policy and Inventory List.
Pursuant to AB 481 an annual report is required for as long as the equipment is available for use AB 481 requires the Sheriff's Office to establish a use policy to be readopted by the Board of Supervisors through an ordinance. It identifies certain specialized law enforcement equipment as military equipment and requires oversight from the Board of Supervisors for purchase and use of what the bill has deemed military equipment.
The law requires the Sheriff's Office to create a use policy that has been readopted by the Board of Supervisors after holding a public meeting to seek public input. The purpose is to increase transparency, accountability and oversight for acquisition and use of this equipment. AB 481 also requires an annual report to summarize equipment use, internal audits and community feedback.
And a community engagement hearing was hosted by the Sheriff's Office on April 25th of this year. Purpose of ordinance, the Sheriff's Office is seeking approval from the Board of Supervisors for the continued acquisition and use of current and future specialized law enforcement equipment to consider any concerns the public may have about safety, civil rights, and the public's welfare.
To approve the current use policies which establish ongoing standards for the safe de-escalation techniques and law enforcement equipment, an application consistent with AB 481. The ordinance and use policies will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval annually. Now, while the legislation has dubbed these items as military equipment, the reality is this equipment we have been using for years has historically not been obtained from the military.
The only military equipment per se that meets the definition in AB 481 that we have acquired for public safety use has been our MRAP rescue vehicle. The Purpose of Military Equipment Policy. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition and reporting requirements of military equipment. The policy defines military equipment as items such as drones, command and control vehicles, battering rams, kinetic energy weapons and specialized firearms are noted in the definition section of this policy.
An attachment to the policy is a Sheriff's Office military equipment itself. AB 481 defines the policy as a publicly released document that governs the use of this equipment, including a description of the equipment, its purpose and authorized use, as well as the cost training and procedural rules for use. Our inventory and policy list outlines these requirements in detail.
The policy itself outlines the duties of a Military Equipment Coordinator within the Sheriff's Office, which is me. This coordinator will be responsible for tracking inventory, coordinating an annual community engagement meeting, preparing an annual report for this body and establishing a procedure for the public to register complaints or inquiries about our equipment use.
The policy also defines the timeframes in which the Sheriff's Office will present the annual report, community engagement meetings and other mandates in accordance with the law. Impact on public safety. The adoption of this ordinance and policy will allow the Sheriff's Office to continue to use the equipment necessary to protect the public and our deputies during day-to-day operations and when we respond to critical incidents.
Specialized equipment has been used by law enforcement agencies throughout the county and contract cities serviced by the Sheriff's Office. The need to prevent the escalation of violent situations from becoming a threat to the safety of the community, law enforcement personnel and suspects. It helps limit and reduce high-risk encounters with violent suspects, and provides life-saving tools and options during natural disasters and other non-criminal incidents.
As I mentioned, the inventory list defines the purpose of each piece of equipment the Sheriff's Office currently deploys. Under Purpose you will see terms such as preservation of human life, search and rescue operations, natural disaster response, rapid response to catastrophic events, reduced likelihood of injury to the public and law enforcement personnel High risk apprehensions and mitigation of violent criminal behavior, less lethal force options and de-escalation.
Justification for use of equipment. This specialized law enforcement equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety The proposed law enforcement equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties. This equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety and use of the military equipment complied with the military equipment policy effective at the time of use.
Recommended actions. It's recommended that the Board of Supervisors receive and file a presentation regarding an ordinance readopting the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's military equipment use policy. receive and file the annual military equipment report, consider and approve the introduction of an ordinance to readopt and amend the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Military Equipment Use Policy, and read the title of the ordinance and waive full reading of the ordinance.
And that concludes my presentation.
Okay, any questions from the Board? Supervisor Hartman.
So I just had a couple of process questions. So this is a policy that authorizes you to accept military equipment, so what is the process in your office for deciding what you need and then how do you engage with the various branches of the military to look at their inventory and how did they decide who gets what? Can you just give me more of the details?
Supervisor Hartman through the chair. Great question, we haven't received any equipment from the military that's listed on the AB 481 policy inventory since I believe was 2015 and that was our MRAP rescue vehicle The majority of this equipment is not obtained from the military. It's obtained from various law enforcement supply vendors that's used, it's common equipment used throughout the state and the country and it just so happens to be defined as military equipment per the assembly bill.
I can tell you since I started doing this report in 2021, I have not received any military equipment from the military. We have purchased equipment that is defined as military equipment under the bill but nothing from the military.
Supervisor Caps?
Thank you, I know this is a annual kind of routine vote that's required. I have to say last year my first time I was a little bit alarmed about the use of military equipment so I appreciate that you're explaining the process and I appreciate that de-escalation is the first tool but can you just elaborate to that? I know you spoke to that in the presentation but just sort of so we see the full picture and that this equipment isn't the first resort.
Absolutely yeah. Supervisor through the chair. De-escalation is a huge part of what the Sheriff's Office trains on, every quarterly training involves de-escalation it's a major focus and the definition of de-escalation are strategies and techniques that are incorporated into a contact to reduce the intensity of the contact and to use the least amount of force possible unfortunately suspect behavior and violent criminal behavior results in The need to use a higher level of force and sometimes this equipment is utilized to prevent the escalation of something becoming war. I can give a quick example, during this reporting period we had deputies contact a DUI suspect in Orkut upon contact the suspect presented a knife pulled the knife on deputies and began to advance toward the deputy sheriffs One of the deputies retrieved a less lethal 12-gauge launcher, which fires a polymer round.
It's a less lethal round and they were able to subdue that suspect, which clearly a suspect advancing with a knife is potentially a lethal force situation But before going to lethal force, they deployed the less lethal launcher. The suspect dropped a knife and that in it of itself was de-escalation. It allowed the deputies to take one step of force before lethal force and that suspect was taken into custody with minimal injury. So that would be an example of this equipment being used for de-escalation.
Thank you so much.
Supervisor Williams. I also just want to say the MRAP has provided some real evacuation uses over the past years and that is a piece of military equipment that's really, really helped us address emergencies so I just wanted to call that out.
I believe we have some public comment on this matter.
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board, we do have four requests to speak. We will begin via Zoom with Denise Elliman to be followed by Lawanda Lyons-Pruitt. Denise?
Hi. I'm Denise Elliman and I have a real big problem with the military equipment. Military equipment and civil rights should not Said in the same sentence. Because when you go to military equipment, all of the BIPOC people, we lose our civil rights immediately. We're going to die. There's no de-escalation when you're black or you're a BIPOC. So let's just get past that. They legislated this to where you couldn't just come in and get military equipment approved for a reason. For this very reason, for civil rights violation. This is the reason why it's been legislated. The law there is a law that you have to bring this to the board and have public comments so the public can know that you want to obtain military equipment. The police department does.
And you're saying that oh no we only want this one little piece of equipment but once they authorize this and once they pass Then you have the right to get anything you want if it's under this A bill, AB 481. So I am against it. My civil rights, the jails are at capacity and the majority of the people are people of color When you use military equipment, you use it against people of color.
It's not de-escalating, it's killing us and nobody On the police force, I don't even know if you have a BIPOC there or if there's anyone there that's representing the people that the civil rights are being violated. Hey, I understand that we all want to be safe but it has been proven that there is a lot of stereotyping of people of color Um, whenever you go to a situation if there's a person of color then you know just shoot him dead and nobody will care.
So when you get your military equipment, then you just have more power to take out more people or make a bigger statements I guess to keep us in In line to scare us and take us back to the 50s, when we basically had any rights. It just appears to me that this is what we're trying to go back to maybe we're getting out of control and we're not following rules so now we'll get these big military We will now move to LaWanda Lyons Pruitt.
2:17 – 2:2515 turns
NAACP, we are not opposed to the use of military equipment because we do recognize that there are certain situations when it is helpful to the public such as if a person is having a mental health crisis and it might save lives. However, there should be transparency In all situations we believe that body cams, that they should be worn and they should also be initiated.
I was unaware of the May 25th public meeting. I would like to get on the meeting list so that I can make any comments that I have at that time in any incident I believe that they should be restricted. There should be restricted use and allowed by trained personnel, and they should be continually evaluated. With that we're okay as long as those specifics are done.
Thank you for your time and I look forward to getting notices further meetings.
Supervisor Hartman?
What meeting are you talking about May 25th?
I heard the lieutenant who presented. He said that there was a May 25th, 24 meeting. Excuse me, I apologize April 25th, 24 meeting when it was presented to the public. I did not receive public notice. I was unaware of that. I don't know how notice is given. I would like notice and would like to be able to participate.
Okay, that's on the record we'll make sure that so question for staff is so every year I know you have you're required to bring it here but you also do public outreach as well?
Chair Lavin, you know that's correct. It's a public meeting it's held on Zoom correction it's held on Teams so anybody with a phone can either log in to the meeting or with a computer can watch the slideshow presentation that's put on its advertised on our website and all social media all share of social media accounts
Okay I think for next year it'd be a good idea just give us like a week, two weeks heads up so that we can get it out to our social media as well and let folks know so that I can make sure that folks like Lawanda that I know folks that are interested would know about it. So Supervisor Hartman?
Yes, and I would suggest you also keep a list of organizations that have an ongoing interest in reach out directly to them. That's what we do in planning people who say I have an interest in these kinds of issues they get automatic notice is that possible to do?
Absolutely we'll do that next year and every subsequent year
thank you okay
Thank You Next
We will now move to Gail Osharenko
Hello again. Chair Lovino, Board. I didn't have prepared comments because I mostly came to hear the presentation and understand better what was said and not said in what we could read from the record online. I mean, I understand a lot of this equipment is not used very often. Seldom. And mostly what I was concerned about is some of it is quite dangerous sort of material and so people have to be trained to use it. They have to know how to maintain it. It has to be maintained. And there were some numbers in there under some of the items about how much it cost to maintain this or that. But there was no, there were no totals. There was no subtotal.
So I began to wonder what You know, what does this cost the county even if the stuff is donated? When you have a big arsenal of bullets and other stuff at some point it's like the stuff around our house. It has matter. It's whatever. How are we going to get rid of it? What does it cost? And I was also concerned about the cost of training when And by the way, I'm speaking only on my own behalf. Just trying to get educated to share the information but you know our groups have been asking for more crisis intervention training for everybody under the sheriff and not getting it so we mean something a little different by de-escalation training. We mean really learning Talk people down, but yes sometimes you have to use something else. So my question and then I noticed earlier you approved under the administrative agenda some appropriation that's related to some of this military or whether it's military or law enforcement stuff.
I didn't know, is that a total of what it cost to maintain all this stuff or was that just specific to the few items? So I just found it less than transparent. I was out of the country on April 25th but I also like Lawanda did not get any notice. I'd love to be notified next year. Thank you.
All right thank you. I'll bring it back to the board. You know, I didn't see any lights on so I'll just kind of lead off. When I read this, I was kind of struck with some of the equipment that's there. Then I started thinking we don't know what the other person has either. So when there's obviously these tools aren't used very often but they have to be in the tool belt.
God forbid you get in a situation where You know, there are small communities that major things happen in. And I just want to make sure that as long as we're being transparent, we're open to the public about what we have, when we use it, tracking complaints which again this is another year of zero complaints from the public on when items were used. Obviously we heard a public comment that not everybody's thrilled about the program but we do track citizen complaints on usage and there were none So, you know it made me unfortunately think about what's the worst case scenario that could happen in Santa Barbara County and we do have to have Unfortunately in a changing society the ability to counter that as well. So Supervisor Williams
Well, I you know, I think that This offers a chance to ask questions and for the Sheriff's Department to give what has been reasonable answers. And so I suppose that it serves the purpose of the legislation, right? Is the chance for transparency and obviously if people get better notice next time there'll be more chance for that.
2:25 – 2:315 turns
Okay can I get a motion? I will move items A through E. Seconded by Supervisor Nelson. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Okay, we're going to keep trucking along. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. And on that motion, I hope staff heard the staff direction that was in there about noticing for next time. I didn't include that in the motion but We got shaking heads back so we're good.
All right that takes us to departmental item number 3, madam clerk.
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Departmental item number three is from the Public Works Department Board of Directors Laguna County Sanitation District and is hearing to consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District ordinance relative to service changes connection charges and trunk sewer fees and resolution relative to collection service changes on tax roll. This item is located within the fourth and fifth districts
All right, let's go ahead. Mr. Sneddon.
Chair Lavagnino and board members, Chris Sneddon with Public Works. I'm just gonna introduce our team here of Marty Wilder and Kevin Thompson who run Laguna Sanitation in our utilities and turn it over to Kevin to carry you through this presentation.
Thank you, Chris. Board of Directors through the Chair, today's recommendation are for sewer rate charges and fees for next fiscal year. Laguna County Sanitation District is a dependent special district created by the county of Santa Barbara in 1958 to address rising housing needs. It provides wastewater services to Orkut and southern portions of the unincorporated Santa Maria area.
District is regulated by several agencies and permits. Our mission is to conserve and protect water resources. The district is currently in construction with its phase one plant upgrade project portions of the new plant were brought online in September, and now all wastewater is being treated by the new facilities. The construction contract is expected to be completed later this year pending punch list items and final completion.
Today's board action considers an updated annual rate and fee ordinance. Public noticing was completed pursuant to Proposition 218, we did receive one valid protest. The hearing date was published pursuant to a government code in the Santa Maria Times. Superchargers pay for annual operation maintenance replacement and reserves. It is assessed and collected on the tax roll. This year, we are in the last year of a five-year rate study that proposed a rate increase of 1.5%. By comparison, the CPI was 3.5% The annual sewer service charge for residential unit equivalent rate is proposed to be at $1,138.37. Over the last year, that's an increase of $16.82 or $1.40 a month, with the monthly rate of $94.86. Multiple family residential rates are charged $924.39 annually.
Schools are charged at $59.05 per capita per year and commercial is charged based on flow and wastewater loading. County-wide, we have a table here that shows the level of treatment by agency and how much their monthly rate is and if they have a percent increase. Laguna is at 94.86% and the average is 79.75%. This next table shows the average of the water and sewer bill combined. We show this comparison because the sanitation district does a couple of functions that in some cases the Water Fund for other agencies do.
Laguna Sanitation recycles water Whereas that is paid for by the Water Fund, by Santa Barbara and Goleta for example. Also our prior upgrade in 2001 was to comply with regulatory requirements to reduce salts in the effluent. That was handled in the Santa Maria Basin by the City of Santa Maria and Guadalupe by buying state water. While Golden State Water did buy some state water it wasn't enough to affect the water quality coming in.
The countywide average is $181.39 per year, the Laguna and Golden State combined is 158.82 per year. This action also recommends setting developer charges and fees for next year. New development pays for trunk line fees which fund collection system improvements and connection charges to fund treatment and discharge improvements. The developer fees are adjusted per index as prescribed by ordinance or agreement The connection charge for residential unit equivalent is adjusted based on the construction cost index, which was 9.4%, and therefore 10,676 per home. The district completed the construction of the Dutard trunk line in 2001. This fee is also based on the construction cost index with a resulting fee of 1,363 per home.
The Bradley trunk line was built by a developer. We have a reimbursement agreement which is based on the prime rate, which was 8.5% resulting in $3,498 per home. Recommending therefore that the board adopt the ordinance setting the rates and fees for fiscal year 2024 to 2025.
2:31 – 2:336 turns
Questions?
Okay,
let's, there are requests to speak from the public.
Chair Lavanino, members of the board we have no requests to speak for this item
Okay Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you Chair Lavagnino and is looking at sanitation mostly in my district and I think I'm the only Great pair up here. I wanted to jump out and just thank you guys for the work here, I'm generally not enthusiastic about increased fees but what I'm also not enthusiastic about is a lack of maintenance and maintaining the infrastructure investment that we have in our county.
And that takes money especially as costs continue to increase so I think this increase is modest I think it also reflects the fact that we've made some significant investments in the last 10 years that have allowed us to only make modest increases at this point. We're seeing other costs go up significantly in other places, and 1.4% is rather small. I understand that that is still a chunk out of many of my constituents. Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public.
of a sewer plant that was operational under the regulations that are necessary in our state. So I think we've ridden that ship out and now we're on calm waters, and I hope that we can continue to keep these modest increase moving forward where we increase these costs to maintain the facility at an appropriate level but at the same time I understand that the money that's going to this is coming out of the pocketbooks of, you know, the families in our community. So I'm more than happy to support this today and we make a motion to approve staff recommendation. Okay.
Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Bob Nelson · Seconded by Joan Hartmann
Show transcript
2:33 – 2:3811 turns
Chair Labanino, members of the board, departmental item number four is from the Public Works Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding County Service Area 12 Mission Canyon Sewer District resolution relative to collection of sewer service charges and sewer connection charges on the tax roll. This item is located within the first district
Chair and board members, I'm also going to turn this one over to Kevin to go ahead and walk you through.
Thank you, Chris. Board of Supervisors to the chair. This action is for the sewer rate ordinance for fiscal year 2024-2025 for the Michigan Canyon Sewer District, also known as County Service Area 12. The county of Santa Barbara administers the service area and comes to see in the Michigan Canyon area Name County Service Area 12. The southern area in green on this map shown, which is more densely populated was put on sewer per regional water quality board in 1983 while the northern area largely remains on septic and it's monitored by environmental health services.
Several extensions were done after 1983 the most recent being undertaken by the county with the help of cannabis funds on Tunnel Road. 877.1 residential unit equivalents are connected to the sewer system, with a total of 803 parcels. Wastewater is transmitted through the city of Santa Barbara through a joint powers agreement for treatment and disposal. The county assesses CSA 12 costs on the tax roll.
The sewer rate is proposed to remain at $316.82 per year which is no change from last year The City of Santa Barbara bills for city sewer services on the city water bill. The reserve balance is $1.7 million and it's considered satisfactory. Recommended therefore that the board adopt the resolution establishing service charges on fiscal year 24-25 and authorize collection on the tax roll.
Because you're giving me the opportunity. Now that we have that small sewer extension, are the adjacent property owners being approached personally to see if they wanna hook up and change the color scheme of your map?
Yes, we have letters in to one in particular. He was a large advocate and they are in the process of doing that switching over. We've also been approached by several others just a couple hundred feet away from where our project left off and one in particular is a very big proponent and enthusiastic for this project so we're thankful that you know this project that was extended not only serves The one immediately adjacent but can also be a pipeline to eventually serve up to 90 parcels, I believe. So I do believe it was money well spent and happy to do the project.
Thank you.
Thank you. This is more a little bit more of a general question but I am curious just how you prioritize repairs
Yes, so we do condition assessments in the Michigan Canyon area. Roughly every five years we videotape sewer pipes with a tractor camera that is inserted into pipelines and we have a list of repairs that we prioritize and typically involves trans-excavation to get down to the pipe and fix them. Thank you. Is
there any public comment on this matter?
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board we have no request to speak for this item.
I'll move staff report, staff recommendation. Second.
Second by Supervisor Williams. All those in favor? Aye. Didn't have my mic on. Okay, so that takes us unanimously approving item number four. So that takes us to departmental item number five.
2:38 – 2:5613 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, departmental item number five is from the Public Works Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding establishing benefits for the county service areas 331 and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District.
Mr. Sneddon?
Chair and board members, one more time. I'm gonna turn it over to Kevin Thompson to cover this one as well.
Thank you Chris and Board of Supervisors through the chair. This action sets benefit assessment rates for street lighting districts and county service areas that do have benefit assessments established. County Service Area 3 is in the Galena Valley. It was created 1963 and provides for street lighting for the unincorporated Galena In Santa Barbara, open space and park maintenance improvements.
And meeting and tree trimming maintenance improvements. The benefit assessment funds pay for street lighting operation to maintenance whereas property tax revenue funds pay for any street lighting that exceeds the benefit assessment. Meeting in open space maintenance and improvements additional street tree trimming around street lights and park related equipment purchases and activities.
The proposed benefit assessment is unchanged from last year, with a base rate of $24 per year. The fund balance is considered acceptable. County Service Area 31 encompasses the Isla Vista area and was also created in 1963. It provides for street lighting in Isla Vista as well as streetscape and landscape installation and maintenance. The proposed benefit assessment is unchanged from last year with a base rate of $12.93 per year, the fund balance is considered acceptable The North County Lighting District was created in 1994 and provides for street lighting in the communities of Orkut, Los Alamos, Cazamilia and the unincorporated areas of Lompoc and Santa Maria.
The district funds street lighting only. In the unincorporated Santa Maria zone a benefit assessment of up to $14.73 can be considered and certain tracts in Santa Maria and Lompoc can implement tract specific benefit assessments. Currently there is sufficient Revenue strictly from the property taxes to pay for all street lighting costs. And therefore, the benefit assessments that could be utilized are proposed to remain at zero.
The fund balance is considered acceptable. Recommending therefore that the board adopt resolutions establishing benefit assessment charges for CSA 3 and 31 and do not establish benefit assessments for the North County Lighting District.
Any questions from the Board? Supervisor Nelson. No questions. Is there any public comment on this matter?
Chair Labanino, members of the board we have no request to speak for this item.
Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Joan Hartmann · Seconded by Bob Nelson
Show transcript
Chair Lavanino and members of the board, departmental item number six is from the Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the approval of the Santa Barbara County Home Consortium and Community Development Block Grant Urban County Fiscal Years 2024 Annual Action Plan and fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2023 annual action plan substantial amendments.
Good morning. You're good. Yes, it is. I got it just made it share love and you know members of the board has to service community services director today the board is being asked to consider funding recommendations regarding the allocation of Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnership Program funds launched in 1974 by the Federal Housing and Urban Development Department CDBG is celebrating 50 years its sibling home is likewise celebrating an important milestone having been approved by Congress in 1994, over three decades ago.
At their core both programs are designed to address the needs of low and moderate income residents albeit in slightly different ways. To elaborate I'd like to ask the staff to begin the presentation to review the recommended allocations and then we'll be available to respond to particular questions. So Lucille if you would please?
Great, thank you. Good morning members of the board. My name is Lucille Boss and I'm serving as Housing Programs Manager in an interim role. And to do our introduction slide, I'll turn it over to HCD Joe Dysvonick.
I gotta say your timing is impeccable man that was just like floated in right on the announcement forget all the pregame
let's go
Well, good morning Chairman Labadino. Honorable members of the board I am Joe Dysvonick, the Deputy Director for Santa Barbara County's Housing and Community Development Division. Today our housing team is going to present to your board our recommended approach for Santa Barbara County's fiscal year 24-25 annual action plan. It is a plan that we intend to submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on behalf of your board later this year But I want to take a minute to better illustrate what this annual action plan does for our community.
Many often think that CSD simply awards relatively small sums of funding to affordable housing developers, which helps them leverage much larger funding buckets from other sources and maybe help them score better on tax credit applications with the state. While this is true and something we are delighted to do, what this action plan accomplishes on behalf of your board has other direct impacts on the community that many may not realize.
For example, on our slide here we see in North County the building of Escalante Meadows which replaced a nearly 70-year old public housing project in the proud hardworking city of Guadalupe. In Mid-County, we've seen excited family moving into their home. A dream made possible by using the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program. In Santa Barbara County this is a program administered by our County Housing Authority on behalf of the city in Lompoc and directly by the City of Santa Maria using Home Investment Partnership funds.
The county staff also administers TBRA using HOME ARP funding. And finally, in South County we see the delivery of meals to our senior citizens many of whom live alone without much or even any family or friends to help care for them as they deal with mobility and financial issues. Or are just plain unable to provide food and cook for themselves. This action plan represents the culmination of a unique robust and comprehensive dialogue that has occurred across our county community over the last year and one that occurs every year We have multiple funding consortiums that help the county equitably evaluate potential investments for our community development and home funds.
And these are consortiums that include the county in nearly all cities. We have the Capital Loan Committee and Multiple Human Services Commission sessions, that ultimately helped shape what we are going to present here today. I want to assure this board and everyone listening today that we are a well-connected community, and one where we all strive as public servants to maximize the quality of living for each of our citizens using the limited funds we have available to us.
Next slide please. In our presentation today, we asked this board to receive and file this presentation, approve recommendations for awarding both Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnership Program funds, and direct staff to include those awards in the action plan adopt the resolution allowing staff to move forward with finalizing and submitting this action plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and finally we also ask your board today to provide staff any direction and guidance you feel are appropriate and necessary.
So I now turn it over to the Community Services Department's housing and programs manager Lucille Buss
Thank you, Joe. And good afternoon now, Chair Lavinino and members of the board. Before we dive into the annual action plan and funding recommendations I want to give a brief history of affordable housing and federal funding sources. You as board members are likely often asked how affordable housing is defined, where the funding comes from, and how it is used. This slide is intended to educate the broader public.
To break down some ambiguous terms into concise concepts, according to the federal government housing is affordable if it costs no more than 30% of the monthly household income for rent and utilities. To be eligible, the household must be either a family or a single person whose income does not exceed the area limits as set by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, which were recently updated. I know you heard a bit about this during last week's rezone hearings and it bears repeating. HUD establishes annual income limits by family size as extremely low-income, 30% of area median income are the average salary for an entry level position in our county Very low income, 50% of area median income about the starting salary for a teacher in our county or low income 80% of area median income about the starting salary of someone who may be working in public safety in our county.
Shifting to specific funding sources that provide affordable housing, established in 1974 the Community Development Block Grant or CDBG program was created by consolidating several programs into a single grant. Cities, counties and states use the CDBG program to undertake community development activities ranging from housing and neighborhood revitalization to economic development and infrastructure improvement.
The Home Investment Partnership Program, or HOME, authorized in 1990 is a federal block grant intended to expand the supply of decent affordable housing for lower income people. States and localities use the funds for a variety of home ownership and rental activities. In general, home funding must benefit people with low or moderate incomes. Tenant rents are generally capped at a fixed percentage of the AMI, and units must be occupied by income-eligible households for a set period of time.
CDBG and HOME are used to leverage other funding sources. They're often braided with local, federal, state, and private or philanthropic funding streams to make projects complete and sustainable. Now that we've level set a bit, I'll provide a brief overview of CDBG and HOME funds as they relate to the annual action plan. The fiscal year 24 plan presented today represents the fifth and final operating year of the 2020-2025 consolidated plan which articulates overall unmet needs, goals, priorities, objectives, and performance measures under CDBG and HOME.
Each fiscal year the county is required to submit a plan to HUD reflecting the annual allocation, grant awards made to qualify non-profit organizations operating in our county and management and oversight of CDBG and home funds. They serve as strategic planning documents for programs projects and services to address our counties low income residents needs utilizing these federal entitlement funds The action plan presented represents the county's formal grant application to HUD for CDBG and HOME funds. In addition, the county is required to submit to HUD an annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment when prior year funds are used for a project or program not previously included in that year's action plan.
In addition to CDBG and HOME funds, two non-HUD funding sources are included in our department's Periodic Notice of Funding Availability, or NOFA, under Housing Development. The county is the lead agency of the State Permanent Local Housing Allocation, or PLHA consortium. And the county's in-lieu fee program also provides funds for housing development. While these funding sources are not part of the annual action plan submitted to HUD, they're included in today's board letter recommendations and presentation because a housing development project recommended under the NOFA may be funded with any combination of home, PLHA and in-lieu funds.
A brief overview of the funding sources and uses in coordination with other local jurisdictions. CDBG funds may be used for public services, capital and infrastructure, and economic development. In partnership with local participating jurisdictions, County HCD serves as lead entity for the CDBG Urban-County Partnership and Home Consortium alongside the cities of Buelton, Carpentria, and Solvang. The home consortium includes these cities as well as the cities of Goleta, Lompoc, and Santa Maria.
Each year as lead agency, the county receives an allocation of CDBG and HOME funds from HUD on behalf of the Urban County Partnership and HOME Consortium. Home funds are primarily used for housing construction and rehabilitation, and tenant-based rental assistance. As I noted a moment ago, a housing development project recommended under the HOME NOFA may be funded with any combination of HOME, PLHA, and INLU funds, and you'll see that crossover reflected on the slide here.
Additional PLHA funds are available for homeless services under a different NOFA. And breaking news, today HUD announced the county's actual fiscal year allocations just this morning. Today's presentation and board letter includes estimated allocations and a contingency plan which will be used describing how project funding will be adjusted to reflect a lower actual allocation amount.
Diving into each of the funding sources, starting with items in the annual action plan. CDBG includes just under $1.2 million allocated for fiscal year 24 plus $500,000 from previous years. The CDBG program funds are utilized primarily for capital projects and public services programs with a cap of 15% of the annual allocation which may be allotted to public services.
The county retains 20% of the annual CDBG entitlement allocation for program administration. Priority is given to projects that are ready to proceed, and any unallocated CDBG funds and program income are added to the following year's NOFA to be made available to capital projects. HOME includes under 1.3 million allocated for fiscal year 24 plus 3 million from previous years.
Home funds are primarily used for affordable housing construction and rehabilitation, and tenant-based rental assistance or TBRA, home buyer assistance and other eligible activities. The county retains 10% of the annual home entitlement allocation for program administration. HCD returns to the board as proposed development projects are prepared to apply for final project financing or otherwise ready to proceed.
COVID slowed construction but several projects are in the queue and this funding will be allocated to multiple projects in the next fiscal year. And under state and local, again because of the way that we leverage and braid funding sources I've included state and local funds on the slide here to note common activities although these sources are not part of the annual action plan Next we'll cover the Fiscal Year 2024 Notice of Funding Availability or NOFA process.
NOFAs are published online and sent broadly via email to interested parties. County HCD issued the fiscal year 24 NOFA on November 15, 2023. Applications for CDBG funds were due on January 12th, 2024. CDBG public services applications were vetted for initial threshold eligibility by staff and forwarded to the Human Services Commission's allocations committee for review, scoring and funding recommendations.
Staff reviewed applications for CDBG capital projects and forwarding its recommendations to the Capital Loan Committee for concurrence of staff recommendations or other recommendations. The funding recommendations from both committees are included in this presentation and today's board letter. Housing Development Funds require Notices of Intent, or NOIs, of developments ready to proceed in FY24. NOIs for housing development funds including HOME, State PLHA and Local In-Lieu were due on November 30th, 2023.
For housing projects that appeared ready to move forward in the current year, HCD requested full applications. As projects are ready to receive a commitment of county funds, staff returns to the board for formal funding reservations or approval of funding awards and execution of loan documents. CDBG urban county member cities displayed on the slide may fund qualifying projects in their respective communities or pool their funds.
Carpinteria has selected qualifying projects in their jurisdiction and Bulton & Solving are pooling their funds with the County. 22 applications were received for CDBG public services funds representing about $638,000 in requests with only an estimated $183,000 available to allocate. Six applications were received for capital projects, totaling $6.5 million in requests with only an estimated 1.2 million available to allocate.
I'll turn it now to James Francis, Senior Housing Program Specialist who administers CDBG Capital and Public Services funds.
2:56 – 3:036 turns
Good afternoon, Chair Lavagnino and members of the Board. The CDBG Public Services Program prioritizes the use of funds for a wide range of public service activities serving low-income persons including but not limited to emergency shelter, educational programming, health services and services for senior citizens. CDBG funds may use to pay the costs of rent, utilities, staffing supplies and materials that are necessary to administer services or to operate the facility in which services will be provided.
This slide shows examples of the populations and services included in today's funding recommendations which are detailed on the next slide Here you can see the detailed funding recommendations from the Human Services Commission. They're sorted in alphabetical order by agency, but you'll notice each priority population is served by several agencies and programs.
Carpinteria projects are italicized as Carpinteria completed a separate review and recommendation process for applications for its sub-allocation of funds. Please note that funding amounts, funding recommendations for the following agencies were revised. Can
you go back to the slide? That was very fast.
My apologies. Please note in addition that the funding amounts for the following programs were adjusted to reflect the lower allocation from HUD that we received this morning. Funding for Good Samaritan Shelter Freedom Warming Centers, Legal Aid Foundation Family Violence Prevention Program and San Dines Valley Community Outreach Senior Food Program has been reduced from $22,000 each to about $20,300 each.
And funding for the Girls' Income Carpentry Out-of-School Program and People's Self-Help Housing Corporation Camino Scholars Carpenteria program was reduced from about $7,400 each to $7100 each. Under CDBG regulations, the balance of funding may be used for a wide variety of activities including but not limited to public facilities special assessments and privately owned utilities.
Real property improvements to non-profit facilities economic development activities and housing activities CDBG funds may be used to pay for construction costs including labor and materials, project management, planning and permitting costs, and other related expenses. On this slide you'll see a summary of what is included in today's funding recommendations which will detail on the next slide.
Here you'll see the detailed funding recommendations from the Capital Loan Committee. They are also sorted in alphabetical order by agency, but you'll notice a project in each region of the county, south, mid and north. These funding recommendations are not impacted by the reduction in CDBG funding. Note that in addition to Carpentria's suballocation of CDBG funding, the Franklin Creek Trails project is recommended for a portion of the county's funding pool.
Also, Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley has secured a commitment of $300,000 in CDBG funding from the city of Santa Maria representing half of the total expected project cost. Remaining unallocated CDBGs funds along with any program income received during the year will be added to the following years NOFA to be made available for capital projects. These unallocated funds serve two purposes Just regard that.
The first purpose has already been served by absorbing a portion of the reduced CDBG allocation. Second, if any emergency needs arise during the course of the year this gives the county the ability to respond to them with existing resources. For example several years ago CDBG funds were used for the emergency replacement of a broken water heater at a local emergency shelter which kept warm water flowing for dozens of people.
We return now to Lucille who will discuss funding under the HOME program
Thank you, James. Home consortium member cities may reserve funds for projects in their respective cities or also pool their funds. In this case Santa Maria and Lompoc reserved part or all of their pro rata share of home funding for implementation of TBRA programs. Ten notices of intent or NOIs for developments ready to proceed in fiscal year 24 were received and full housing project applications have been requested from developers as projects are ready to move forward.
No housing development project is included in the 24 action plan at this time. But HCD staff maintains a list of housing projects that are expected to proceed in the near future, included in today's board letter and will return to the board for project approvals at that time. I'll now turn it back to Joe.
So Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, thank you for your time today. We look forward to your questions, your guidance and your response to our recommended actions as listed here. I now turn it back over to Director Jesus Armas to close us out today.
Last August, after five to six years of planning and gathering funds, the Santa Barbara County Housing Authority joined by community members gathered to bake ground on the Escalante Meadows development. As you are aware, the site of the construction is formerly occupied by Ranch Acres, which consisted of a single story cinder block 52 units public housing facilities built somewhat 75 years ago.
When completed early next year, Escalante Metals will provide 80 modern affordable units as well as a 20,000 square foot community building which will host a computer lab, wellness clinic, resident and community service center as well as meeting rooms and a children's center with indoor and outdoor play areas. A commercial kitchen will also be provided. Funding for Escalante Meadows reflects collaboration between federal, state, and local resources. The county provided over half a million dollars which was augmented with over $800,000 from the City of Santa Barbara CDBG funds In addition, Representative Carbajal provided and secured $2.5 million while Senator Limon secured $3 million. This wonderful development is a testament to what is possible when we work together and pool our resources to realize an important community benefit.
With that staff is ready to respond to your questions or concerns. Thank you very much. Questions for staff?
3:03 – 3:1125 turns
The CDBG capital recommendation has the $570,000 for the trail. And what of that, what portion was Carpinteria and what portion was the collective? Or is that just our portion? And if it's just our portion, what's the total amount including Carpinteria's?
I think we don't have that information right now, Supervisor. We'll get that back to you. Okay
great.
Thank you. I love this report every year because it just, you look at all the projects and think of how many people's lives are impacted positively and I want to thank the work of our commission. This is an important commission. They're all important but this one really does allocate a lot of essential funds and my commissioners Eloise Chavez, Gene Davis and Steve Menardas do a lot of hard work. To that end, I would like to just ask about outreach and how you solicit applications for these precious funds?
Thank you for the question, Supervisor Capps through the chair. The notices of funding availability are sent broadly to an email distribution list. It's over a thousand individuals so that includes representatives from dozens of different agencies and persons who are interested in affordable housing projects developments and also homeless services.
Great and does the Commission have a
role in that outreach as well? Thank you for the question. I'm not certain, but I can check in with the Human Services Commission and let you know. OK, thanks.
What the various members of the commission do however is spread the word within their respective areas. So I was meeting with one of them recently who made me aware of their effort at trying to get the word out so that people do go to county's website and obviously explore the possibility of submitting a funding application.
Thanks for that. And the nature of my question is just to make sure that we're reaching the hard-to-reach populations that might not be represented in that 1,000 but it sounds like the breach is brought at this point but to continually have that pressure on ourselves to go further. Thanks.
Yes thank you Chair Labanino. I was looking a list of the capital requests. We didn't have any capital request from many of the Santa Barbara County Departments?
I don't think your mic is on. There you go.
Apologies, we did not receive any requests from county departments.
So no parks or general services?
We did not.
Interesting. Okay. And then fighting back Sunray Valley they've asked for $600,000. I know that they were getting some money from the City of Santa Maria from their CDBG funds as well. Is that $299,000 from us and the $300,000 from them? Or were they asking for $600,000 from Santa Barbara County specifically?
Supervisor Nelson, they did request a full $600,000 with the $290,000 coming from the county and $300,00 from the City of Santa Maria. I believe Mr. Francis can answer about the full request amount.
That is correct. They originally requested the full amount from both us and from the City of Santa Maria in collaboration with the City of Santa Maria, we determined that each of us would recommend 50% of the funding amount.
Okay great thank you. And then the Franklin Creek trail improvements, is that within the city limits or is that outside the city limits where that portion of the trail improvements would be taking place?
That is within the city limits of Carpinteria.
Okay and I think the reason asking those questions is one of my frustrations about the CDBG capital process that we go through is that we get an allocation based on our unincorporated population. So all the cities get a allocation for their cities which they spend on their city residents and it's always a little bit of a frustrating thing for me to sit up here and see us get it based on our unincorporated population and then go spend it on the cities, and I'm sure it's a worthy project in Carpinteria.
And I'm sure there's a lot of unincorporated residents who will enjoy those operations in the cities. But you know, like a lot of things with it only goes one direction and we only get a small group of funds. I'm really disappointed in the Parks Department and General Services Department for not applying for some of these funds because I think these are really important funds to do things in our undercorporate areas on the capital side. I think we're missing a huge opportunity for that. I mean at the end of day, you know, these are the people who asked and I think these are really worthy projects so Supervisor Williams Not trying to kill that contribution. I'm just saying as a general message to the rest of the departments in the county, that we're failing our unincorporated residents by not devoting more of these funds to projects that serve them because cities don't go spend it in unincorporate areas.
That just doesn't happen and so this is really a chance for us to make sure those funds get back to where they were intended You know, CDBG is a concept with federal funds that were pooled together from a lot of different sources that used to be basically small earmarks to these areas. And they returned that back to us to be able to, you know, closer to the residents and taxpayers to deliver those services. I think we're missing the boat by not making sure that we're actually hitting the target population.
Not going to vote against all this. I'm actually really excited about the Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley, even though that's going to be in the City of Santa Maria it really is going to serve all of the youth in the entire Santa Maria Valley so it's going to be a regional navigation center for those who are homeless or needing additional services that might be accessing Hancock College. It's a great program, a great CBO but I do think we need to have greater allocation of these funds in the future to some of these other projects that are way underfunded. I mean, we see that CIP list. I think we're going to get it next week. There's hundreds of projects it seems like that are on that should be eligible for some of these funds and so I think we should be taking a second look at that in the future as a priority before we start paying for some of the municipal projects that aren't cities.
I mean they're great projects and there's nobody applying in the county then go that direction but I think we're really missing
To your point Supervisor Nelson, through the chair as we issue the NOFA next year I'll make sure and have that conversation with my
colleagues.
Maybe the staff can articulate I think we've heard you strong and clear Supervisor Nelson but who is part of the consortium for CDBG in HOME because they're the issue about carpentry can you just reiterate who's in the consortium?
Thank you, Chair Lavino. The consortium members are the unincorporated county as well as the cities of Buellton, Carpinteria and Solvang. So each of them does receive a CDBG chair through the county rather than as a separate allocation.
And Mr. Chair, when you send me that financial information which should be helpful if you could this afternoon I'm prepared to support this as drafted but I would be surprised if the improvements were all happening in the city boundaries on the trail because most of the trail is in the county. So, is in the unincorporated areas. And just one other thing to check on is because SCE is planning a lot of repair on there as well so it would be good to make sure that we're not being duplicative of the required work because they're planning on spending at least $1 million worth
3:11 – 3:149 turns
Yes, thank you Chair Lavinier. I understand that Carpinteria and Solvang are built in a part of the consortium but it's pretty good bang on for their buck right? They're about 10% of the population but they're getting half percent half of the capital funding so maybe the average is out over the years maybe not but looking at the numbers right now it gives me a little bit of a pause and wanting to make sure and I don't mind there's some They'll get more, some years they'll get less. I get that, that makes sense but I think we need to look at this longitudinally if I said that word right so that we make sure that we're really again hitting these federal dollars. They're supposed to go to this population and make sure those dollars are actually getting there is what my message is and it's not just, I'm not just rooting for ORCiD.
There's a lot of unincorporated communities that could use these funds.
Great okay makes a lot of sense. Is there any public comment on this
item? Chair Lavanino, members of the board we have no request to speak for this item.
That means you guys did your job right all right so is there a motion to move forward with staff recommendation?
Supervisor Lavanino I'll be happy to make that motion.
Roll-call vote Moved by Bob Nelson · Seconded by Joan Hartmann
Show transcript
That's staff recommendation of
course yes. All those in favor aye The session. County Council, could you please read in what we're going to be talking about today?
Thank you Mr. Chair and members of the board. The board scheduled for two items in closed session public employee performance evaluation and public employee appointment reappointment for county council.
And you're thinking about an hour? Yes. Okay so we'll be back at 130 or close to. All right, good afternoon. I'd like to reconvene this meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk, can we get a report out?
3:14 – 3:158 turns
Chair Labadino, members of the board, the board met in closed session on public employee appointment reappointment for county council. The board voted unanimously to reappoint Rachel Van Molen as county council.
Congratulations, Rachel! Would you like to say something?
Oh, well thank you. I appreciate the reappointment. I was actually just going to add to the report that we also met in closed session on performance evaluation and took no reportable action.
Okay.
But thank you again for the reappointment.
Excellent. Okay with that we are what's it called adjourned until June 4th? Yeah kind of
been used to it. I think we have been meeting every few days. We should just keep on rolling May 14th
No, that's canceled. Yeah yeah it was wrong on here so we are I'm sorry we're meeting May 14th in Santa Maria yeah that's the that's what we're adjourning to