UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:046 turns
I'll get everybody to quiet down. If you can find a seat, grab a seat. All right folks if you can we don't mind people standing but you can't be in the doorway so make sure we have access. If you can find a seat find a seat appreciate it. Thank you everybody for being here this morning. Good morning, I'd like to call to order the July 9th 2024 meeting of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk can we get a roll call please?
Roll call, called by Clerk of the Board
Show transcript
Next item business is the approval of the minutes from the June 25th meeting. Can I get a motion?
Move approval.
Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Madam Clerk, are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Lavinino, members of the board I do have a few announcements this morning. We posted an addendum to today's agenda on Friday July 5th amending the administrative item number six from the behavioral wellness department regarding an agreement for services of independent contractor with Davis House with David Guest Home Inc. Davis for provision of intensive residential program for structured mental health rehabilitation services. Administrative item number six was amended to include ratify to the recommended action A. Recommended action A should read approve, ratify and authorize the chair to execute an agreement for services of independent contractor with Davis Guest Home Inc., not a local vendor, for the provisions of the intensive residential program for structured mental health rehabilitation services.
This addendum was posted online and has been made available to the Board and the public. We posted an ex-agenda item request on Monday, July 8th, 2024. This ex-agenda request was from the County Executive Office and is regarding a report on the 2024 Lake Fire. The agenda, the ex-agenda request was added to today's agenda and distributed to the Board and the public Tuesday, July 9th at 820 AM.
Since there is a need for immediate action, that need for action came to the attention of your board subsequent to the agenda being published on July 3rd 2024. Your board will need a vote to hear this item pursuant to government code section 54954.2. A forfeits vote is required. For the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda, please see page two of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment may do so virtually via Zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page 2. If you have any questions, please contact the Clerk of the Board's Office at 805-568-2240. That concludes my announcements for today.
We'll take a vote on that in just a second. I just want to make an announcement The conference room next door has the ability to listen and see in here, and if anybody would like to take advantage of that. We also have the planning commission room open downstairs as well. So we need a vote on the ex-agenda item. It will be a four-fifths vote. Can I get a motion?
0:04 – 0:115 turns
I'll make a motion to add the ex agenda item to today's agenda.
Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. That takes us to
the next item of business is our CEO report.
Good morning, Chair Lavagnino and board members. I have two reports today both regarding wildfire and before we have an update on the Lake Fire, just a quick brief announcement about behavioral wellness. This is some good news. The community wellness team was highlighted as a feature in the CNN opinion article this past week. The piece highlighted the impacts of surviving a wildfire. It applauded the county's work of providing the community wellness team, a team of professional counselors for the first year of the Thomas Fire and the 1-9 debris flow. It acknowledged that the, acknowledged the important work that these teams did in helping our community decide between being a victim or survivor and in the end empowered the community to become more resilient so acknowledgement to behavioral wellness and the community wellness team Now on to the Lake Fire.
Our Emergency Operations Center is currently activated for the Lake Fire. It was sparked Friday at 3 p.m. near Zaca Lake and has prompted evacuation orders and warnings in a rural part of the county. Currently, the fire is spanning the third and fourth districts of our county. I also want to thank Congressman Carbajal who personally called many of us to offer whatever federal assistance is needed.
Today we have in the room Anthony Stornetta, Chief of Operations for the County Fire Department as well as Todd Hopkins from CAL FIRE. Also available is Ryan McKee from Caltrans on Zoom and Chris is here from Public Works should there be any questions. And with that I'm going to hand it over to Anthony.
All right, good morning. Good morning. Chair Lamplinio, member of the board, thanks for having us here today. I have with me Todd Hopkins who's one of the other incident commanders. Just for a little information at the ICP is myself as incident commander, CAL FIRE and the Forest Service we are in unified command due to the values at risk and the direct protection of the different areas so we have federal land, we have state land and because of the state lands in our contract with CAL FIRE that's why we're in unified command with them So I'll have, if you don't mind, can we put the map up if you don't mind?
So I have the map up here and I know it's gonna be difficult to read and see but I'll kind of explain it to you and walk around. But I'll just give you some stats real quick at where we're at on this fire so currently there's 20, it's at 26,178 acres as of this morning. It's 12% contained. We have 2,485 personnel that's probably going to go up another couple hundred today with the resources that we have on order Currently we have 190 fire engines, 70 hand crews, 11 helicopters and last night we actually ran those helicopters at night and did night water dropping above Brinkerhoff Happy Canyon just because of the values of risk in the homes up there. So this is something that's out of the ordinary that we haven't done in a long time and hopefully either tonight we're looking at bringing some CAL FIRE helicopters as well to do that night dropping with us to protect those values at risk.
Maybe go back to the other map real quick if you don't mind. The previous one, yeah. So I'll try to give you guys an update. Is this a point up there? What's that? No. Okay. So if you look up to the far left there, that's the very north end of the fire and what that is is that's a sysquak drainage that goes around the top of that that goes all the way into the forest and to the far left of your map, that's the sysquak area. The fire on that side is looking really good.
We have some dozers and hand crews all working in the CISCWOC drainage there. Coming down the left-hand shoulder where you see a little bit of black, that's our containment currently. So what that is, is that's all along Fox and Canyon Road. If you know where Tracer Manos is and the Diamond JT we're to share as the Rancho CISCCWOC and La Laguna Ranch, that follows that all the way down. We have some good containment on that, some good dozer line. There are a few places where we have to walk some fire down and just really tie that in. And that comes around to the Zacca Lake entrance and then down to Zacca Station. So I know we have a road closure, a hard road closure there right now where we're not letting anyone in. That's because that's not totally secure line.
As soon as we get some secure line on that and some more containment down to Zacca Lake We'll lift those closures and open those wineries back up. I know there's a lot of concern about some businesses in there, and that is our priority of ours. We want people to get back in there, and we also want those wineries to get opened up too. As you look down there to the blue area, that's the Cedric Reserve right there.
All the way to the Cedic Reserve, we have it tied into the Figaro Mountain where the Neverland Ranch is. But as you go from the Cédric Reserve to the back of Would stop in Brinkerhoff. That's where we have that fire sitting way up on top of the hill at Brinkerhof. We had a lot of crews and a lot of resources there last night, put some dozer line in. We have a line in between the homes and the fire right now.
And we're just watching it, and that fire is just slowly backing down. We're going to try going direct where we can but just for an example yesterday was very, very hot out there. If anyone may have been up at 11 o'clock at night looking at the weather station, it was 86 degrees with 6% RH. That is incredible, 11 o clock at night. Fire behavior acted as if it was like that as well. Today's fire behavior will be a little worse. I mean we'll have a lot higher temperatures and we'll get into that in a second. As you keep on walking around, you look out there and you can see the Branch 5 so that's kind of where the fire is heading. It's heading out to the forest and we have confirmation it's in the wilderness now Our main plan and our values at risk is everything along Brinkerhoff, Happy Canyon.
We want to keep Skirting away from all those homes. Most of our resources in our night dropping helicopters are working in that area. We can switch to EVAC now if you want. For evacuation, so if we look at the bottom there and we see those two orange polygons. So the way the evacuations work is with the team and then OEM and the sheriff. Myself and I give Frank Vasquez from the Sheriff's Department a lot of credit he has been side-by-side with ourselves on the team at the incident command post. And then Kelly Fire and also the team member and sheriff are all in OEM together too so of everyone communicating to each other. That's how we look at evacuations, build these polygons and eventually send them out so it's a team effort. So at the bottom there those two orange polygons are the Woodstock area along Sedgwick Reserve and then the one a little farther out is more towards Happy Canyon.
And if we need to build it out again we'll go to the right just a little bit more. Everything else in front of the fire is in a mandatory and at the back there that's that Sisquauk Fox and Canyon area If we had to look further, we hope to leave all this in a warning and not pull any more orders. That's what we want. But this is our current situation on evacuations.
I'd be happy to answer do you have anything else Todd you want to
0:11 – 0:1924 turns
add?
Should we get questions for Anthony Furster? Do you want to just do the whole thing? I'll just do the whole thing. Okay, let's do the whole thing
and then we're going to questions. So in addition to the firefighting efforts will also be starting today suppression repair efforts so along if you go back to the other slide of the fire It's kind of hard to tell but if you see along the southwest portion of the fire where the black line is, that's our control line. So we'll start doing suppression efforts in there so we'll start and what we'll end up doing it's also bringing in what we call a work team or a watershed emergency response team because we know with the vegetation that's being burned off, the steepness of the slopes of what can happen for the future with the rains So not only are we battling the fire, but we're also looking at those efforts of trying to put the land back into some type of repair and not just leaving a mess out there for everyone to deal with in the future.
All right let's open it up for questions. Supervisor Williams. Oh you wanted to go there first? Supervisor Hartman
I think one thing that comes up repeatedly with my constituents is there's a difference on where you go for information about services to people and evacuations and about fire behavior, but you're communicating. So if people are interested in knowing more about fire behavior, the wind, the weather, what's the best source of information for the public on that?
I think at a very high level, it's at the radiosb.org sends out all the information but if you're going to look at a high level what the weather is going to be doing it's the National Weather Service site and the NOAA site will have it on there. Today we'll go in red flag again at noon. Unfortunately we're going to experience some pretty significant winds tonight. And if they want to look at that, it's mostly on the NOAA website in National Weather
Service. So significant winds tonight in the fire area?
Correct. We'll get a northwestern push again and that's the reason we're putting all those efforts on the Happy Canyon side because that northwest wind is going to push down. Like I mentioned last night, 87 degrees. It's burning all night long. So Santa Maria last night, I think I put on a jacket about 8 o'clock at the command post up there. It was really hot still.
So the people who are evacuation warning, big winds come. So they should be getting alerts from GetReadySB.org? Correct. And then will they also get door-to-door sheriff or I mean how, I think the question is how do you move from evacuation warning to you gotta get out of here?
So we're going to get plenty of notice. There's a lot of people out there on the line, our divisions and our branch directors. They all know that we need plenty of notice to get that up and rolling. Working with Frank Vasquez at the command post, we know that delay could be an hour to get all the search-and-rescue and all the sheriff in there for the order to get all those doors knocked. They'll go in there and actually knock on doors. I know the sheriff was proactive and knocked on doors even in the morning when we sent that out, so I know we're going to try getting we will get way ahead of that and give them plenty of time to get out.
Okay but my take away and I wonder if this is correct is that we've got high temperatures and heavy winds and so it's a very precarious situation tonight
It's the fire is still up on the hill pretty high. And we'll give plenty of notice to get out when that time comes. Okay.
Supervisor Nielsen?
And then one other thing is, the areas that are in evacuation warning, that is where we want the residents to be ready to go at that moment's notice. So if you're an evacuation warning, the resident should be prepared and have their documents that they need to bring with them. Their pets have something to do with them. And be ready. So when they do get that call that we're putting into an evacuation order, that they're ready to get out because the longer that they stay and we also say if during evacuation warning it's still a good time to leave and leave the area.
If a lot of people don't leave during evacuation warning and they wait for an order it's harder for us also get resources in why everyone's coming out especially if there's any narrow roads in the area
Excellent point. And I think people understand that and people with large animals should have already gotten out if they're in a warning area
Supervisor Nielsen.
Yes, thank you Chair Labadino and I just wanted to thank you both for being here today considering we're in the middle of a fight for you guys to come here and speak to our board and the public is really important so it's a lot of good news but also reason to be cautious moving forward. Status on structures? I had heard that we hadn't lost any structures. What is that status now?
I can speak on behalf of the SRA lands. There's no confirmed structures. I know in the forest they're still trying to make some access up there and trying to get confirmation up there, but I know for the state lands in our area that there have been no confirmed structure loss.
That's great. That's great news. I
really think that that's a tribute to maybe one damaged outbuilding, maybe in the four. OK, so we do have one damaged outbuilding and in the forest.
That's great news. And so also wanted to thank you for the work with the Ag Pass program. It seems to be a successful program that a lot of our farmers are still able to access their property. And that's the work that you guys did in advance to prepare some of our farms or agriculturalists so that they'd be able to handle these situations and still be able to attend to their livestock or their crops In the fourth district, in the Sysquak area so it's moving away from that direction. So Tepscay Canyon is looking okay at this point as far as your projections are concerned? And will those lines be shored up pretty soon? Will those go to black?
Yeah, very north part of the map there. Unfortunately, we've had a lot of fires in areas you know. We had La Brea. We also had the Alamo come around that side. So with that, we have all the old maps that we used for those dozer lines and they're actively in there pushing through the CISCWOC. And I say as we push through the CISCWOC, we have our tribal partners with us as well so we're looking at all the sensitive sites as well.
But, yeah we're looking at opening that up around the north end. Thankfully that fires back in really nice and gentle so it's given us opportunities to actually go direct on it instead of opening about Sysquak all the way but we also have a contingency plan about opening Dozier line up on the east side on the ridge line above Tepeskaya Canyon into Colson if we need to do
And I just know from the storms that we had a couple of years ago, a lot of the access is still limited out there to the forest from Tepeskaya and that area is obviously a bit of a tinderbox. So I know there's a lot of concern about you know the fire getting up in that direction but it's good to hear that things are moving away from that. Obviously there's some other communities that are absolutely in concern and so thank you for all the work guys are doing out there.
Yeah and just in Supervisors to finish up is every spot we have for a line We're looking for that next one. So we'll have three levels of protection. If we can get a fourth one in, we try to do that. That's what we're doing now. We have people way out front planning the next line so we don't fall on our heels and we're behind the curve.
0:19 – 0:2316 turns
Supervisor Williams. Well I just wanted to back up Supervisor Hartman's point about evacuation warnings being a good time to get out if there is bad prognostication ahead in my district, you know the first district we have gotten used to frequent evacuations for fire and flood danger and Many in my district have come to regard evacuation orders as get out fast and evacuation warnings as get out more leisurely.
And so especially if there's large animals or other reasons why it will take you a while to get out, it's a good time to get out. And then I just want to express the board's thanks to all of you, the firefighters and all emergency personnel that are involved in the incident including probably some of the folks back here since all county workers are emergency workers and go in and work in the EOC. So we want to appreciate your all of your participation and work.
Supervisor Caput?
Thank you, I'll just echo the gratitude. This is a time when we understand the collective nature of our work and the gratitude that we all feel for first responders and those here who work for the county and others. I did have a specific question that's somewhat related to evacuation. I spoke with the CEO about this and I've gotten some concerns from neighbors south about the closure of 154 or the partial closure now and how that might relate To evacuation plans if anyone could give an update or any speak to that it would be helpful
Yeah, I've been talking with Zeke from Caltrans. And it's nowhere near us having to evacuate that direction but again we're always looking ahead in case that happens so I've been speaking with Zeke about it if we evacuate the Roblar Happy Canyon we would most likely send them in the same as 101 but talk to him if we need to send them up over the hill for any reason at all he'll one way the light there on the south side here at San Antonio until everyone just comes out they'll be no entrance in Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
All right, any other questions? Thank you very much. We appreciate all the work you guys are doing. Thanks for keeping us updated. Appreciate it and the public. You're welcome thank you. Thank you.
Supervisors if I could just add this because Because OEM was not available, they are at the incident command post today. But we did have a shelter open in Solving, at the Solving Vets. No one visited the shelter so it's on warm status meaning it's on hold but it can be opened with any request. I just want to let the public know that. All right
great thank you very much for the report. Our
next item of business is the administrative agenda. Any board members like to pull any items from the administrative agenda? Supervisor Caps.
A17 please.
16 and 20.
16 and 20. Supervisor Nielsen, I have you for 5? A5
and I'd like to make a comment on
A17. 17. Okay Madam Clerk any members of the public wish to pull any items from the administrative agenda?
Chair Lavanino, Members of the Board we also have two requests from the public to speak on Administrative Item 17
17. It's a popular one today. All right, cool. Can I get a motion to approve the balance of administrative agenda except for items 5, 16, 17 and 20 please?
So moved. Second.
Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? The balance passes unanimously. So we're going to go to the resolutions to be presented At this point. So can we, Madam Clerk, can we please read item A-1 into the record?
0:23 – 0:283 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board, Administrative Item 1 is sponsored by Supervisor Lavanino. It is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Ryan Estes, Jose Garcia, Debbie Haldeman, Salvador Lara, Manuel Ledezma, Andy Marquez, Richard Mayer, Inma Morales, Octavio Ochoa, George Ruiz and Ron Vicente as the July 2024 Employees of the Month for Santa Barbara County.
Joining us here in person we have Ryan, Jose, Debbie, Salvador, Manuel, Richard, Irma, Octavio, George, Ron and via Zoom we have Andy. I will now read the resolution into the record Whereas Ryan Estes, Jose Garcia, Debbie Haldeman, Salvador Lara, Manuel Ledezma, Andy Marquez, Richard Mayer, Irma Morales, Octavio Ochoa, Georgia Reese and Ron Vicente exemplify the county's organizational values of accountability, customer focus, equity and inclusion, innovation trust and ethics. And whereas Ryan Jose, Debbie Salvador, Manuel Andy, Richard Irma, Octavio George and Ron model the transformative behaviors of collaborative problem-solving alignment with the county's vision risk taking data driven decision making and strategic thinking.
They make up the extraordinary facilities team with a combined 127 years of dedicated service to the Department of Social Services. And whereas, the facilities team supports the mission of the department to help our community be safe, supported and self-sufficient by providing excellent customer service to over 900 employees in six buildings across the county. And whereas the Facilities Team is known for their exceptional service and willingness to go above and beyond, assisting to address security concerns, building specific demands, and creating new workstations overnight for our growing workforce. And now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that the Board of Supervisors recognizes the Facilities Team of the Department of Social Services as the Employees of the Month for July 2024 passed and adopted today.
Good morning Chair Lavinino and members of the Board. I'm Rachel Lipman, the Assistant Director for Administrative Services in the Department of Social Services. And on behalf of Director Nielsen and the rest of the executive team, I'd like to thank you for honoring this facilities team today. I'd also like to introduce Susan Freeborn our Facilities and Disaster Services Manager who is the amazing leader of this amazing team.
We who work on the administrative services side of social services often stay out of the spotlight. Much of what we do is behind-the-scenes and this is the case with our facilities team here, Ryan, Jose, Debbie, Sal, Manuel, Andy, Richard, Irma, Octavio, Jorge and Ron Support over 900 employees in our department every day. Efficiently distributing supplies to all buildings, keeping our stock rooms well-stocked and organized and making sure our employees have the tools and materials to best serve the community.
These dedicated employees display an incredible work ethic, stepping up during disasters, safety events and anything else unexpected that comes our way. They are the first ones reporting to work in the mornings, opening up the buildings, welcoming their co-workers with smiles and friendly greetings Which they did this morning. Many of them were on the road at 630 so they could check into their buildings on their way here and They have a couple of their former peers who are now working in our IT division who were able to cover the mail runs this morning.
So, it is an honor and I'm proud to be here to share in taking some time to honor this team and the critical role they serve for our Department of Social Services and the County of Santa Barbara. Thank you.
Looks like you all want to say something. Anybody want to speak now? All right, the behind-the-scenes crew. Thank you for being here this morning. That takes us to item A2. Madam Clerk.
0:28 – 0:343 turns
Supervisor Labanino and members of the Board, Administrative Item 2 is sponsored by Supervisor Labanino. It's to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of July 21st 2024 through July 27th 2024 as pretrial probation and parole supervision week in Santa Barbara County. Joining us here in person we have Chief Probation Officer Holly L. Benton, DPO Rita Guzman Senior DPO Miguel Ochoa, JIO Lizette Cruz Zamora. And now I'll read the resolution into the record.
Whereas during the week of July 21st through the 27th 2024 probation parole community supervision officers criminal justice and juvenile justice professionals and the community across the nation will join to celebrate pre-trial probation and parole supervision week Whereas the Probation Department today consists of over 328 dedicated professionals working collaboratively with other agencies and community partners to deliver evidence-based programs to justice involved adults and youth, while focusing on the enhancement of safety, the reduction of recidivism and racial inequities, the protection and compensation of victims, the promotion of crime prevention services, intervention, rehabilitation, positive youth development, and restorative justice principles.
And whereas probation officers and juvenile institution officers provide an efficient and cost-effective use of public resources by supervising approximately 2,639 adults and approximately 273 youth within Santa Barbara County. The Probation Department conducts pretrial assessments and currently monitors 555 individuals on pretrial supervision utilizing the least restrictive options necessary to ensure public safety. While allowing them to remain in the community and avoid incarceration and assist with the reduction of local jail population by providing supervision, assessment, and safety referral to individuals approved for release on alternative sentencing programs.
And whereas during the department's 115 years of service, probation's role has evolved dramatically and probation now serves as an integral partner in local law enforcement and the criminal justice system. The Probation Department serves as an essential connector in the justice system bridging the gap and maximizing the resources available to reduce recidivism by carefully balancing direct human services with research-based deterrence and interventions.
Probation department staff possesses and continues to display a high degree of professionalism, commitment and pride in their work they perform for the courts in our juvenile justice facilities and in the community. While striving to guide and support justice involved individuals towards becoming productive and successful members of the community. Santa Barbara County Probation Officers, Juvenile Institution Officers and Pre-Trial Service Specialists dedicate their lives to rehabilitation and community safety in order to improve the quality of life for all of our community.
Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors hereby proclaims the week of July 21st through the 27th 2024 As pre-trial probation and parole supervision week, and recognizes these officers for the significant contributions to making the County of Santa Barbara a safer place to live. Passed and adopted today
Good morning Chair Lavanino, members of the Board and CEO Miyasato. I'm Holly Benton, the Chief Probation Officer. It's my privilege to represent the officers and staff of your probation department today and to thank your board for this resolution which spotlights the important work our dedicated professionals do in our community and in our Juvenile Justice Center every day.
Through our work we offer the power of hope and a second chance for success. And I'd like to thank your board for your continued support of our department with me today are three of our line officers who represent our adult and juvenile divisions in our Juvenile Justice Center, and I'd like to give each an opportunity to briefly introduce themselves here board and to share a little bit about their work
Good morning Supervisors to the Chair. My name is Miguel Ochoa, I'm a Senior Deputy Probation Officer. Today I'd like to share a few of the initiatives juvenile probation is undertaking this year. First we are expanding the use of child and family teams meetings to all youth assessed to be at risk of removal from their homes These meetings include the youth, family, service providers and other identified supports.
They are led by a probation officer specifically trained in meeting facilitation. These meetings allow the youth to advocate for themselves as they are able to voice their needs. The goal is to strengthen family relationships by providing needed supports that would allow the youth to remain in the community and in turn lowering the number of youth entering foster care or being rearrested.
Juvenile probation is also continuing to conduct two wellness operations per year, one prior to the start of the school year and another prior to the holidays. During the back-to-school event youth and their siblings are provided with backpacks, school supplies, healthy snacks, and support to ensure school enrollment. School attendance has shown to be an important factor for our youth to stay on track.
Lastly we will have reentry navigators through Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley to serve youth detainees at the juvenile justice center ranging from a few hours to several years. Through these efforts we support our youth in making positive changes, demonstrate compassion in our juvenile justice system, improve outcomes and also strengthen families and communities as a whole. Thank you for the opportunity to highlight our Juvenile Division today.
0:34 – 0:385 turns
Good morning Supervisors to the Chair. My name is Rita Guzman, I'm a Deputy Probation Officer in the Adult Division assigned as a Department Services Navigator. This initiative was launched in March of this year as part of the Coordinated Entry Pilot also known as Whole Person Care. In this role I contact individuals who walk through our doors and assess their specific needs so that I can connect them with any and all available resources within the various county departments.
I have worked closely with community services, public health and the Department of Social Services to meet the needs of those I contact. We have been able to work as an effective team to help those in need. I would like to share a success story that I had the privilege to experience. A client reported to probation and requested assistance. He was in need of medical care, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment and housing.
He was unhoused and not from the area. Using our resources, the individual was connected with the access line, community services and public health. The client was provided with a same-day appointment with behavioral wellness. He was thankful for the attention and help he received and appreciated being heard as to his concerns and needs. It was rewarding to see this client connected with three services all on the same day.
Thanks to the teamwork of multiple departments. Although this is a new assignment, we made an impact on numerous lives in a short period of time. Thank you for the opportunity to share on behalf of the adult division.
Hello, my name is Lissette Cruz and I'm a juvenile institutions officer at the Juvenile Justice Center. As a JIL, I work with detained youth to provide them with supportive services that will assist them upon their reentry into the community through a network of support our goal is that they will make better decisions and not continue into the adult system To that end, this year we implemented a Restorative Justice Specialist who specifically works during the evening and on weekends to assist youth with conflict resolution.
The specialist utilizes community resiliency model and restorative justice circles during individual and group interactions. Youth can be referred for services by staff or can request services to prevent or resolve conflict. This gives youth tools to handle their emotions better and teaches skills to understand others' point of view. As we now can have youth committed for several years, the facility also implemented a Youth Leadership Council which meets weekly.
The council consists of three youth who have demonstrated good behavior and who have the ability and desire to represent the needs of all the youth at the JJC. This forum allows for youth with long commitments to have a voice in facility events and program improvement. It also enhances each youth's development and increases program participation. Recently, the council organized a facility soccer tournament and barbecue which all the youth really enjoyed. I appreciate the opportunity to highlight the good work of the Facility Division. Thank you.
Thank You chief and thank you all we really appreciate getting a little insight into your daily activities so much appreciated
Chair LaVanina, we have so many members of probation here. Could you just stand and be recognized? The whole probation team that's here.
All right. That takes us now to our administrative items that have been pulled by the board and the public. We'll take them in numerical order. Madam Clerk, can you please read Administrative Item No. 5 into the record?
0:38 – 0:438 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Administrative item number five is from the Behavioral Wellness Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding the Regents of University of California Agreement for Crisis Recovery Engagement Diversion and Outreach Proposition 47 Research and Evaluation Services for Fiscal Years 2022 through 2026 and Data Transfer and Use Agreement for Fiscal Years 2022 through 2026.
Supervisor Nelson.
Yes, thank you Chair Lavagnino. My concern with this item was that as I looked at the contract it technically began in 2022 and we're sitting here in 2024 almost two years later and I'm unsure whether those services have been going on and the contractor just hasn't been paid. I think it deserves a greater explanation. I went through the material to determine why it had been so long. The Credo 47 program seems to be a very effective program and I'm not opposed to that, but just on a process basis approving a contract that's over halfway through a four-year contract is troubling as well as a data use agreement that's included in here.
If that wasn't in place for the last two years, how's the data been sharing? The contractor is supposed to provide quarterly reports. How does that all work if we don't have an agreement in place? So I was troubled by this item and trying to understand exactly how something like this shows up in 2024 when it should've began in 2022 and that we're almost halfway through this contract in general.
So I was just hoping maybe get some explanation from the behavioral wellness department You know there was also supposed to be an initial evaluation done by the contractor. Is that in place? None of that was in the narrative on this item so just from a process point of view, not a programmatic point of view I had an issue with this item. So I don't know if anybody from behavioral wellness is here.
Director
Navarro. Yes, good morning Chair Lavendino and Supervisors. I am joining you from online this morning yes so this item is actually for the evaluation part of Credo 47 a contract with Jill Sharkey and UCSB To evaluate credo seven overall and its performance. Unfortunately, so to first note yes the team from UCSB created an initial evaluation plan which was Reviewed by our team. It has been a protracted agreement and negotiation on this contract because the respective HIPAA experts on both the B-Well side of the house and UCSB were at a disagreement regarding projected health information And how that would be shared and collected. Our respective councils also went back and forth over the past year and a half trying to decide who, how this contract could get written in such a way that we would be sharing information legally and appropriately And not violating any of the HIPAA rights of the clients whose data would be shared.
So that took, unfortunately a protracted amount of time and each time we thought we had come to an agreement there would be one more piece where UCSB or the proposed contractor may say well there's this piece of information we'd have to reevaluate again So while there are quarterly reports to the state on Credo 47 that are provided by our teams in-house, this overall evaluation of the project has not yet occurred but now can begin that process and be completed by 2026 which is the end of the funding.
Okay, well I think that's a better explanation. I didn't quite get that out of the board letter and so I appreciate you giving that. It does kind of beg the question on whether the scope should have changed because there has been work that should have been done over the last two years it seems like hasn't been done at this point now. So is it still $130,000 for your life since some of that work was obviously unperformed since the data wasn't being shared for the first two years?
Yes, as the evaluation context and content has not changed it just now needs to be performed. What was only performed thus far was a plan for the evaluation but not yet the full evaluations we were not able to come to an agreement until now on how to share the data in such a way that was beneficial to the clients and to the program evaluation.
Well, I think I'm comfortable with that. Again, it was a little troubling when I looked at it and trying to understand how we got to where we're at today. And on occasion other departments also bring contracts to us that are most of the way through and that's... Are we supposed to be a rubber stamp up here? Or are we actually supposed to approve things? And I think that it's the best practice to see these things earlier than as late as this one but I think I'm okay with moving forward with it this time. Thank you for the explanation.
I'll make a recommendation to approve item A5.
All right, we'll just do them all together but yeah cool we don't need a special vote on that one so let's go to Madam Clerk can we please read A16 into the record?
0:43 – 0:454 turns
Chair Lavinino, members of the Board, Administrative Item 16 is from the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding an amendment to the Joint Powers Authority Agreement for Santa Barbara County Association of Governments regarding the coordination of broadband activities.
Supervisor Hartman?
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just wanted to call this out. I remember it was several years ago I had a call from Congressman Carbajal saying there's going to be a lot of money, $60 billion coming for the federal government for broadband and then 6 billion from the state and so you better get a plan and you better get an organization. And I looked around and we didn't yet have our IT department and where could this Go. And so SBCAG, the board agreed to take it on that it's similar enough to other kinds of infrastructure that crosses jurisdictional boundaries and so we were able to get some of that money and develop a whole regional plan and now we have a governance structure It's been approved by all the eight cities and now the county. And so we're well positioned to, and have been writing grants, getting grants, and getting broadband services throughout our county particularly to the most underserved areas.
So thanks to Congressman Carbajal and thanks also to SPCAG Board and the Executive Director and all of the staff there who has worked as well as the Broadband Consortium It's been a lot of work, a lot of coordination and it's been a really successful venture I think.
And one of the items that you forgot to mention was that you've been at the tip of the spear pushing this all the way so congratulations and glad we're actually making progress. So yes and Bob too exactly. Okay so that takes us we don't need a separate vote on that I imagine so we're going to go to A17. Madam Clerk please read that one in.
0:45 – 0:5824 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Administrative item 17 is from the County Executive Office. It is to consider recommendations regarding mutually beneficial capital projects and limited term programs in accordance with the 2024 settlement agreement between the county of Santa Barbara and the regents of the University of California. This item is located within the second district.
Okay, and we had a request from the public so let's lead off with the public first then we'll come back to the board. I'm not sure who put in a speaker slip.
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, we will begin here with Kimberly Kieffer. Good
morning. Good morning chair. Good morning Board of Supervisors. Good morning local SEIU. My name is Kimberly Kieffer. I am the Alavista Recreation Park District's General Manager, LCCSB Class of 2002. I'm here personally to thank you all for prioritizing projects that have been driven and determined by our community members, by our Board of Directors Thank you, Mr. Chair.
That will make significant change. We look forward to working with you on implementation and a special thanks to Supervisor Caps for advocating for the voice of Isla Vistas and parks and open spaces, thank you.
Thank you Supervisor Caps
Thank you. Yeah, I just wanted to flag this item because of to acknowledge the longstanding work that preceded me definitely preceded me but is the first tangible this is the first tangible outcome of a long-standing tough but cordial struggle This is a challenge with UCSB over housing and the lack of housing and how that has a ripple effect throughout our entire county. And this is an actual settlement agreement that this board, Supervisor Hartman, Supervisor Hart, Supervisor William, all of you have worked on including the CEO's office to work with UCSB to get them to do the housing we so desperately need.
It was designated by the campus for Isla Vista improvements for their students, the safety and health of their students. And so working with stakeholders, Ms. Kiefer and Mr. Abboud and others And as well as our department heads to come up with a priority list and this is that priority list that will target better housing in Isla Vista, better infrastructure. We just had a tragic pedestrian death also in District 2 recently and so many people are walkers and cyclists in Isla Vista. This will help improve our sidewalks and leverage Thank you.
I want to start by saying thank you so much for the work that you're doing. It's critical to our bluff safety and so many important things, I just wanted to flag this with a deep sense of gratitude for the work that it reflects in the years and also the housing that will be built. That was the key part of the settlement but UCSB has agreed with tough targets to build 3500 more student units as well as 1800 workforce housing ramifications for the entire county. I just wanted to acknowledge it.
And I think we have another public speaker that I see.
We will now move to Jonathan Abboud here in Santa Barbara and he will be our final speaker.
This is different. You
haven't been here in a while, man. It's only
been two months. Board of Supervisors thanks for having us here today my name is Jonathan Daboud I'm the General Manager of the Isla Vista Community Services District and I am speaking on behalf of the Board of Directors on this item. The board letter and I submitted a letter to you all so I'm going to just outline what we submitted in writing already but this board letter has a spending plan for $3.7 million in settlement funds Between the county and the university for the benefit of Isla Vista and UCSB students, IVCSD was asked by the county to submit our priorities on how these funds should be spent.
And our Board of Directors seriously considered this request at our April 2024 retreat and unanimously supported placing the implementation of the Isla Vista Parking Action Plan as our top priority. Our priorities were submitted on April 30th, and on June 3rd we submitted additional specific information about the startup costs for a parking enforcement program at the request of the county. This project has regional significance due to the California Coastal Commission's conditioning of new housing growth in Isla Vista on parking monitoring and regulation to ensure that coastal access is protected.
Parking must be addressed in order for needed housing production to occur in Isla Vista as originally envisioned in the Isla Vista Master Plan. As you may know the county, UCSB and IVCSD partnered for the first time in 15 months on the Isla Vista parking study which is planned to be completed by October 2024. Each agency is equally funding this study, and it was unique in that it gathered 12 months of parking occupancy data and conducted robust community engagement with 1,500 people engaged.
At this point the top recommendation of the Parking Action Plan is to put in place a parking enforcement program, of which there is none in Isla Vista at this time, to enforce existing and standard parking regulations. This includes the 72-hour rule blocking sidewalks, driveways, red curbs site lines and time zone violations. Based on the data, the curb is over parked to a high degree in Isla Vista with an average of 102% occupancy during the winter quarter of 2024 of UCSB and with evenings averaging 108%, some streets go above 200% occupancy due to illegal parking.
Right now, the need for parking enforcement is supported by students, families, business owners, long-term residents and coastal users. A parking enforcement program would also be essential in ensuring that the county ATP and IVCSD mobility plan elements, which are part of this settlement funding spending plan can be successfully implemented. We respectfully request that the county add to the settlement funding project list, a line item for one time startup costs for the parking enforcement program to match IBCSD's allocation of $300,000. Thank you. Thank
you. Supervisor Nelson?
Yes. Thank you, Chair Labadino. Um, I'm going to go ahead and support this item. Uh, but one of the items on the list was gave me a little bit of, um, heartburn and that was the, uh, The pilot project for housing inspections. And I know that there's a lot of good, it can come from inspections especially with bluff safety but it is concerning to me when we may have if we develop a robust inspection program functionally they're very difficult to run I was just reading up on San Luis Obispo City who started one and then closed it up because it was too difficult, especially in a college town. It sometimes leads to actually less housing believe it or not so there's a lot of concerns out there with that item and so I think the devil will be in the details when that comes back to the board.
I'm not going to necessarily support that without a lot Thought and development of that piece of it. But I think as a conceptual list, I'm great to move this forward but I just wanted to reserve my concerns about a pilot project. You know again it sounds good but it can often lead to more problems than existed before so just wanted to highlight that before I approve this item.
Supervisor Harp?
I just had a question for Supervisor Caps. What do you think about the CSD recommendation for, I think it's $300,000 for matching their contribution for parking enforcement?
I appreciated the request for one-time funds. These are all one time funds which is a key consideration for every single thing on the list. Obviously there's many priorities, but we can keep talking. There is some discretion here and perhaps there's a way to do some sort of ‑‑ we're paying for a parking study, a portion of a parking study. Perhaps there's a way to lean into the actual enforcement piece. So I appreciate Ilovisa CSD's perspective there.
Great. Because I think they raised some really important points and housing is number one issue, and if you could get rid of those cars you'd have a lot more room for housing and it would be a much more attractive place. And right now people just park and leave their cars for a long period of time so anything in that direction would be appreciated.
I
just wanted to clarify that. So when we talk about adding $300,000 you're talking about it's out of the 3.7 million dollars so just to be clear to everybody we're not just throwing $300,000 on top for parking this is out of UCSB's money okay
thank you yeah thank you Supervisor Nelson On the Rental Inspection Program, and I'll definitely take a look at what San Luis Obispo's experience was. I do think, and thanks for highlighting it, Isla Vista is a very unique situation with tenants who really need to be empowered. Student tenants are historically not empowered to report to report balconies that are not safe. We've seen that time and time again, unfortunately, tragically. So this is an exploration. This is a pilot project very specific to Isla Vista that will help tenants live in safer environments. And we've all seen that up close. It's a top priority, and I'm actually most excited about this piece of it but know that we need more exploration and working with planning development to make sure it's a really thought through program and really has the outcome that we want, which is just safer housing.
Balconies that are fixed. Lack of mold that is taken care of. Just places that you would want your child to live in. That's the criteria for me. Thanks.
Supervisor Williams? Yeah I appreciate your openness to the request because I think they all kind of fit together and the piece that was missing was the parking enforcement. Just from the perspective of, you know, the tenants will have more leverage and more ability to live in places that are to code If there is more production, and the stumbling block of not having parking enforcement there for production and being constrained by the Coastal Commission mandates is significant. And it's something that previous third district supervisors have struggled with before going a long ways back. And so I think that this potentially could help you unlock All of those pieces.
Supervisor Nielsen?
Yes, thank you Chair Levin. This is the last chance I get to say something before this comes back to the Board. You know, I think that there's a lot of good looking at high level public safety issues like supervisor caps bringing up on bluff safety mold things like that. Where these inspection programs come in is when they start looking at every little doorstop and getting deep into the bringing everything up to code so that's where I saw that there was some trouble not that a landlord shouldn't be working towards those things but you get down into the details And it becomes very difficult for a landlord to continue to operate is what I've seen in some of these inspection programs.
The other issue that I have concern about that is our own capacity in our current planning and development department, our building division and inspection programs that exist now are understaffed and have significant delays. And so adding another program on top of them gives me heartburn. And so you know that's something that I think will need to be addressed when this comes back to the board. So just wanted to highlight those things before we get back when we see this maybe this fall or in December.
Supervisor Hartman.
Just quickly must add I think the planning and development building inspection has much improved, and we're grateful to our director for that. And just have to get that on the record.
Yep. Supervisor Capps closing? Nope. We're all good. OK. That takes us to our last administrative item A-20.
0:58 – 1:0419 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Administrative item number 20 is from the General Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding a First Amendment to the service and ground lease agreement with the Solving Senior Center. This item is located within the third district.
Was there any public comment on this? I
don't believe
so. This is the Senior Center in Solving raised millions of dollars for a new facility because we have the largest percentage of seniors in Solving and it's hard to raise money if you only have a short-term lease, and so we had to extend this lease It was extraordinary work, I understand with James Cleary and Skip Gray. And just wanted to call out how they really bent over backwards to help the Senior Center and it's much appreciated.
Excellent. So at this point I'll take a motion on the balance of the administrative agenda.
Move approval.
Moved and seconded, all those in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Now is the time for members of the public to speak on items that are not on today's agenda. Madam Clerk, are there any requests to speak on today's agenda?
Chair Labanino, members of the board, we currently have 13 requests to speak for general public comment this morning.
We have how many?
Thirteen.
Thirteen? Okay, well do the full three minutes Before we go there, Supervisor Hartman has a public comment so we're gonna lead off with that.
Thank you very much. I wanted to request that we consider an item for a future agenda and that would be to get a report from our Community Services Department about the impact of the recent decision, the grant pass decision by the Supreme Court. I think that has tremendous implications for our programs And I hope they'll be working with County Council as well so we understand not only the people but the belongings and private and public property. Because I'm getting a lot of questions about this, and I think it's worthy of a D item.
Correct. I agree. Was going to ask for the same thing. Supervisor Nielsen?
Yeah, I just wanted to, you know. I think it'd be great to have a more comprehensive look at that. I know we actually have an anti-camping ordinance actually on the books. I think it's chapter 24 that's already in place. It just hasn't been enforceable up to this point. You know, I had looked at maybe bringing forth something to address that but I think we have a lot of that on the books now but it would be nice to see if we can tie all that together. Okay.
All right, we have 13 requests to speak from the public. Let's start them off.
Chair Lavanino, members of the board we will begin here in Santa Barbara with Morena Lomes to be followed by Chris Donate.
Hi good morning everyone. My name is Morena Loomis and I work for the County of Santa Barbara and I am also from here. I have been a field and home visiting nurse with the Public Health Department in the Maternal Child and Adolescent Health Program for 10 years. In my role, I serve and advocate for the most vulnerable members of our community. I'm here today as a member of Local 620 to remind the board and leadership of the critical work we do daily to improve the lives of Santa Barbara County residents.
In my program We assess newborns in the first few days post-hospital discharge, link families to services such as mental health support and basic needs assistance, and connect families to substance use or domestic violence resources. Additionally, as a disaster worker I've worked many extra hours during the pandemic assisting in mass vaccinations, supported Red Cross shelters during fires and mudslides, and contributed at other public health emergencies as needed.
I'm also here today on behalf of the many clinical staff in our facilities who aren't able to take vacation time, to be here and share their thoughts on these issues. I hope the Board will negotiate a fair contract that allows us to continue working for Santa Barbara County and also afford to live here. It is incomprehensible to me that the Board and other agencies are receiving a 5% COLA while we, the public health employees with our feet on the ground, are being offered a mere 3%.
And you're just going to get less time to talk. So it's up to you guys, whatever you want to do. That's the way we'll handle it so go ahead.
Thank you. It is getting harder every year to live in this area with such high inflation rates. I can't even afford health insurance for my two children through the County Benefit Plan, and prices through Covered California have been skyrocketing making it my largest bill after rent. We should be supporting families who work for the county to afford quality healthcare coverage.
Please reflect on the importance of retaining quality employees who love their work by compensating us fairly. We are requesting at least a 5% cost of living increase in the first year and a larger contribution toward our medical dependent coverage. As we spend our time supporting Santa Barbara County families, please consider supporting us as well. Thank you for your time.
1:04 – 1:116 turns
Good morning members of the board. My name is Chris Donati, I work for the Treasurer Tax Collector. I've been a county employee for 15 years. I came to you a couple months ago during budget hearings and spoke to you then about some of the numbers and what we were looking at with our contract. Today I'm here with a few more friends and the point is that while I continue to be optimistic and hopeful that we're getting a good deal done I really do appreciate the time that you have each taken to meet with us. Each one of you has taken time to meet with our representatives and I really, really appreciate that. That is what gives me hope that you will understand our plight and understand we need a deal done that's a fair contract.
Now, the hard part is as a member of the bargaining team, I go into those bargaining sessions and the numbers are just so low and they're so not where we need to be in order to keep up. And for me that's hard because I know so many of these people, my wife works for behavioral wellness, her best friend works for child support. My son played basketball with Joe over at general services.
I worked the elections with Sergio and the list goes on and on. This is my community and they live in districts 1-5 and it hurts me because I want to see them do well with this contract. I don't want to see them stressed about bills rents spiking, homeowners insurance going up, car insurance going up. I know you know all about the inflation so that's basically why I'm here is to let you know that I am optimistic we can get a good deal done and I am hopeful that you will recognize what we need in order to succeed in this next contract. Thank you so much.
We're going to close public comment. So your names that are in are still going to speak, closing the rest of public comment. Anybody adding on at this point? Okay go ahead.
Bridget Day to be followed by Corey Toth
Hi, my name is Bridget and I'm an intern with Local 620. Over the course of my internship, I've learned a lot and I've learned the most by speaking with many union members who come from various backgrounds and work in many different roles. And regardless of the diverse nature of their work and their lives, a shared experience among all of them is the incredibly stressful effect that increasingly high cost of living in Santa Barbara County has on their lives.
These dedicated public servants are struggling, many are living paycheck to paycheck yet their work is essential and it's the work that keeps this county running smoothly and protected from crises. These people and their work must be recognized and protected and this is done by affording them the cost-of-living adjustment that is in alignment with the rising prices of our local and national economy As I enter my fourth year at UCSB, I'm anticipating what comes next for me after I graduate. While I would love to stay in Santa Barbara, a place where it's become a second home to me, where I've made many personal and professional connections, it's almost impossible to conceptualize staying here with the incredibly steep prices as a young person.
Renting here is very expensive for me, as it is for so many people and workers in the county. And the only reason I can currently afford to rent is because I live with eight other girls and a house meant for no more than six. And that number is on the low side. I believe so much that the beauty and culture of Santa Barbara County is because of the racial and generational diversity of the people within it, and these people must be given the opportunity to stay and continue to build their lives here and not be driven out just because of inadequate pay.
By giving county workers the pay they deserve and the type of raise that other positions have already received, you can prioritize making Santa Barbara County a more equitable and beautiful place to live. Thank you so much.
Corey Toth to be followed by Chelsea Ofelda
Good morning, Chair Lavendino and supervisors. My name is Corey Toth. I'm an employee. I am employed by the County of Santa Barbara. And I'm in the Clerk Recorder Assessor Department. I've been there for 22 years. And I'm represented by local 620 SEIU. I am asking that you provide those that are negotiating our current contract That excuse me I'm asking that those that represent you in the contract negotiations, that you give them the authority to offer us a contract that has cost of living increases that are more in line with the high inflation environment we've been in over these past several years.
I think we all know that inflation's been high it's everybody notices that but I wanted just myself to do a little research to see what the numbers were. the California Consumer Price Index readings online, and I saw during our last contract that in June of 2020 what the CPI reading was to June 21. So our contracts going on the fiscal year We don't yet have the numbers for June 2024, but basically it was about a 4.5% increase from 20 to 21 and 8.5 percent increase from 21 to 22 and a 3% increase from 22 to 23.
And it's averaging over 5% per year is what the cost of living increases have been over the past three or four years. I went online to look at the budget documents for the county's coffers and to see what our total operating revenue was. And in the 2020-2021 fiscal year, it was about $1,310,000. It's estimated to be about $1,625,000 for the 2024-2025 fiscal year. It's about a 6% per year increase is what county revenues have been increasing your operating revenues. So we've got inflation at over 5% per year. We've got the county's operating revenue increasing it over 5% percent per year Yet our salary increases have been at two and a half percent per year over this contract. They haven't kept up, and so I'm asking that you give the authority to those negotiating on your behalf to offer us a contract that has a fair cost of living increase, a reasonable one.
Thank you.
1:11 – 1:175 turns
Chelsea to be followed by Leo DeCasas.
Is there a Chelsea? OK, we'll skip her and come back at the end. And by the way, while we have a second just on your sign so we're all accurate, the maximum for the board is 3%. So go ahead. Just let's all be talking off the same page.
Hello, Chairman Lavanino and thanks for that clarification and the Board of Supervisors good morning. My name is Leo Decasals and I'm a field representative with SEIU Local 620 and a proud laborers advocate for bargaining units 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 of the County of Santa Barbara I also have the privilege of being a member of SEIU Local 620's bargaining team in our efforts to secure fair and equitable contract this round of negotiations.
And we appreciate the county and your bargaining teams' efforts in trying to reach a deal between Local 620 and the county, the resources that the county has put towards maintaining good labor relations between our employee organization and the County of Santa Barbara And thank you to the board for meeting with each of us throughout the North and South County.
Unfortunately, the county's proposals have fallen well short of our membership's expectations. Expectations that are born out of necessity not greed or selfishness. An expectation that a public sector job at the County of Santa Barbara should provide a great wage, healthcare and fair union benefits. I also have the privilege of exploring county worksites and speaking to employees firsthand up and down the coast.
As our contract expiration drew near on June 30th, county employees felt a lot of things from uncertainty, fear, anger, frustration, and concern. We've asked ourselves over the course of the past few months how is it fair That $1.9 million is being allocated in inequity funds for upper management who make significantly more than 620 members. How is it fair that money's being allocated to labor groups who aren't even out of contract?
It has been made clear to our side just how much of a fiscal impact it takes to reach a deal that can satisfy both parties. What we are doing here today is making it clear how much of a fiscal impact that is having on our members' wallets with the rapid increase in inflation over the span of the last few years. Every day, we go past expiration as critical funds being taken away from our members that go to basic cost-of-living expenses.
Today, we challenge the board and your team to get creative with what we have access to now and to be open to forms of revenue generators like the transient occupancy tax that's on the proposal today. Together, we demand the respect and compensation we have earned during the course of the past few years. Fair contract now. Thank you.
Elspeth Mills to be followed by Michelle Weimer. Elspeth? Okay, we will move on to Michelle Weimer to be followed by Skye Beard.
Okay, good morning supervisors through the chair. Thank you for the opportunity to address you today. My name is Michelle Weamer and I've been a Santa Barbara County Public Health Department employee and county resident for nearly 15 years. I am here to bring to your attention a pressing issue that affects the vitality and effectiveness of our county services, the inadequacy of our current salary negotiations which directly impacts our ability to attract and retain talented individuals.
As members of this esteemed board, you understand that the heart of any successful organization lies in its people. Yet we find ourselves in a situation where our salaries are failing to keep pace with the cost of living in our county. This discrepancy is not just a matter of numbers on a paycheck. It directly affects the quality of services we can provide to our community. When our salaries are not competitive, we struggle to attract the brightest minds and retain experienced professionals who can truly make a difference.
This results in high turnover rates which are not only costly but also disruptive to the continuity of services that our residents rely upon. Furthermore, our current benefits packages are falling short of meeting the needs of our employees and their families. Access to affordable health care, retirement security and other essential benefits are not just perks they're fundamental rights that should be guaranteed to those who dedicate their careers to public service Therefore, I urge you to invest in us by supporting competitive salaries and robust benefits. Doing this not only acknowledges the hard work and dedication of our employees but also ensures the sustainability and effectiveness of our county services for years to come.
Together we can make Santa Barbara County a model of effective governance and a place where public service is truly valued and rewarded. Thank you for your attention and your dedication to the well-being of our county and its residents.
1:17 – 1:247 turns
Sky Beard to be followed by Meg Beard.
There's a button on the right, your right. Here? Your right. It moves it up. Oh. No, no, no. Moves the whole podium. Hold on. We got someone to help you.
Like this? That's all right. All
right.
Thank you. Hello. Good morning Chair and fellow board members, my name is Sky Beard Armbruster and I may not be a member of the union back here but I am a senior at Dos Pueblos High School and a member of the community. My mom Meg she's the breastfeeding coordinator for WIC yeah I'm just really hoping they can get a fair contract. I'm very encouraged by the success of other unions locally like the SBTA, the teachers union that recently earned a fair contract or as fair as they could get for their part of the Santa Barbara Unified School District and I'm just hoping we can do the same here except maybe hopefully make it a lot shorter than they did.
Everyone knows this country in the economy isn't what it used to be. Gone are the days where your average family could vacation several times a year and only one parent needed to work. What was the expression they used to use back in the day? Oh yeah, the American dream! Since the pandemic working class folks have struggled due to job cuts extreme inflation and add the cherry on top absurdly high house prices and rents due to our wonderful and beautiful town The people are struggling, especially the brave public workers in the county government.
From our food inspectors to our environmental protectionists to those in WIC and other members of the union here who help young disaffected mothers like my mom. Mothers who are the backbone of society. Heck, these people who are really trained to give counsel on breastfeeding, nutrition and raising children instinctually in the past have responded to emergencies like the Thomas Fire in 2017 and the COVID pandemic to become first responders.
Duties they aren't even trained to do. They're all in for our communities but they're overworked, stressed and exhausted. But they do it anyways because they truly care about the people they support They care about us. Their value is indispensable, however when employees can't even afford to pay the bus fare to the workplace well maybe they'll find a job with better play closer to where they live not because they want to but because they have to They have families too after all.
Don't just make the right choice, make the only choice. Raise COLAs to a living wage. Start Trilingual Pay. It's time to come together and make the promises of this community true once again. Thank you.
Meg Beard to be followed by Laura Robinson
Good morning Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. Still morning after all. And Mona thanks for all you do too. You don't get acknowledged enough. My name is Meg Beard I'm a I'm a dietitian and lactation consultant for the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department. This last Sunday, I started my 26th year working here for the county. I'm also on the bargaining team this year and last two. I would like to thank the board for their additional increase in authority a couple of weeks ago.
This is much appreciated. Contract negotiations is not just about COLAs, medical or inequities. It's also trying to be innovative and coming up with new ideas. I do not see this happening. I'm a supervisor and I want to attract and retain staff. It very hard to train new staff. We proposed additional pay for advanced degrees and retention pay According to like 5, 10, 15 years on up and this went nowhere.
There was no interest. The County of Santa Barbara has advanced pay for credentials and longevity pay, and they've got significant COLAs recently. So pretty soon we're going to have more problems where they will not drive to Santa Barbara to work. They will stay in Ventura with their higher COLAs, the retention pay, and money for advanced degrees. So we will be even have more of a difficult time retracting and retaining our employees here in Santa Barbara County We had been working towards trilingual pay.
I was very impressed with our last session, come to find out last night our new proposal it was cut out again and this is dear to my heart. I work for WIC we have two full-time regular staff, Mixteco speaking staff in North County were adding a third and I just cannot believe we can't put this on the books and get it going The population doesn't even, the women don't even speak Spanish. They come in barefoot to see a lactation consultant and the men run the family. They're scared of the medical community. We're trying to build rapport so just an interpreter service is not gonna cut it. So please help get trilingual pay on the board for Christ's sake.
Let's be one of the first counties that offer trilingual pay and meet the needs of the poorest of the poor who we work with in public health Okay, and lastly a small important death benefit to increase it to 50,000 from 20 right now. We had a coworker in our program in WIC in our site died in January and her husband doesn't work. And average funerals are now $30,000 so please increase it. It's pennies to the county to increase that small benefit.
Coworkers are very upset that we're out of... We don't get back pay for When we don't get back pay when we're out of contract. Thanks for all you do, thanks for more authority in the contract. We're one county and DASHU will be missed.
1:24 – 1:3110 turns
Laura Robinson to be followed by Christina Rubio
Good morning Chair Lavalinia and the Board. I just want to say that if you guys had a union, you might be able to get 5% instead of 3%. My
name
is Laura Robinson and I'm the Executive Director of SEIU Local 620, the labor organization that represents the vast majority of county employees including at the fire department people who won't be here today because they're manning the phones at the Lake Fire, including you know those facility employees that you just recognized as employees of the month. We represent employees in every major department at this county and I am here today to address the urgent need of additional financial support for our dedicated frontline workers over the term of the last contract. The cost-of-living adjustments have effectively resulted in pay cuts for our members due to the skyrocketing inflation driven by the pandemic era Yet, your county employees have continued to show up and perform their job duties with dedication.
Whether it's maintaining our streets, providing essential public health services or offering mental health support, our workers have been there ensuring that this county runs smoothly. It's time for this board to properly recognize and compensate these employees for their relentless efforts and commitment. The current offer from the county is unacceptable, failing to even address this year's inflation alone.
Balancing the budget on the backs of your employees is not a sustainable or fair practice. I need to reiterate what I said during the budget deliberations. This is not a status quo year. This is a year of crisis. Your members are in crisis mode, choosing between paying their rent and buying groceries. The time is now to address these very real concerns. We cannot wait and you cannot ask us to.
Our frontline workers deserve better. They deserve to be acknowledged, rewarded and compensated for the indispensable contributions to this community. I urge you to immediately grant your bargaining team additional authority and direct them to prioritize fair compensation for the dedicated individuals who keep this county running. Thank you.
Christina Rubio to be followed by Karen Hallenstein.
Hello, like she said my name is Christina Rubio and I am an AOP with the Sheriff's Office. Here is a list of three current job openings in my city and the starting pay. Subway, $20. Panda Express, $22. In-N-Out Burger, $ 22. AOP with Santa Barbara County, 2109. If you are a new hire with the Sheriff's Office and assigned to work at the main jail here is what you can expect for your pay of 2109 You will work a 12-hour shift and your schedule will change every 16 weeks.
Since you cannot afford to live in Santa Barbara, you will commute from Santa Maria. The commute will add 2 1⁄2 hours to your work day. You'll wake up at 3.45 in the morning to get ready for work, leave your house at 4.30 so you can be sure to be on time to start your shift at 6 a.m.. Your shift will end at 6 p.m., you'll get home at 7.15 and be in bed by 8 p. m., hoping that you can fall asleep right away because your alarm is going to go off again at 3 45.
If you are single parent of a toddler, you will need to pay for 14 1⁄2 hours of daycare for every day you work. When you are working the overnight shift, which you will do for 16 weeks straight and every other ship rotation. You will also need to place your child with a family member for the nights you work then get home in the morning pick up your child and take your child to daycare so you can sleep during the day.
You'll work on the holidays depending on your ship rotation if Thanksgiving is Thanksgiving Christmas and New Year's fall on Thursday Friday and Saturday you will work all three holidays You will explain to daughters why their dads have been arrested. You will tell mothers that their son is going to prison, and you will console fathers who have done all they can to get their child into psychiatric treatment but to no avail.
And for all of this and so much more, you will earn less than if you worked as entry-level person in a fast food industry. Thank you.
Karen Hauenstein to be followed by Chuck Williams in Santa Maria.
Hello everybody, I'm really sorry to have to show up in the middle of your contract negotiations but I've been sitting here listening to people from the tax collector's office and the assessor's office claim that they've been doing their jobs correctly Well, I happen to know
that
you haven't been doing your jobs correctly when it pertains to my parents' property. Because when my parents' titles were attacked through nonjudicial foreclosure fraud, you reassessed our property without transfer of title, without the sale of the property or the gaining of anything to my parents. What you did is you caused us about $100,000 of reassessment that we can no longer pay our mortgage on our home that my parents built.
That is now facing foreclosure of its first, it's real mortgage. We're now facing that because the county has over a hundred thousand dollars of reassessed taxes that they never deserved Because somebody in the tax assessor's office and the tax collector's office refuses to speak to us now. For years we started sending letters, certified letters and then speaking to you directly Joan.
And this whole time nobody speaks to us and nobody resolves the issues which have now taken us out financially through this lawfare situation. And the only entity that has gained anything is the county, because the county got their reassessed property values when we're still sitting in the house. The county got that money. The county is the only one who's benefited so far That's why I'm here suffering through everybody clapping themselves on the back.
You guys know what's happening, what the job that you do how it's affecting the people in this county when you do it wrong? I think you guys need to talk about that in your negotiations.
1:31 – 1:346 turns
Next speaker.
We will now move to Chuck Williams in Santa Maria, who is our final speaker.
Good morning I'm not going to say what I was originally gonna say today because the union has basically changed my mind about The way I think about things. I am not a union fan, I have had fireworks thrown at me, I've had firecrackers, I've had cherry bombs thrown at me. I've been threatened by the Union because I worked in a non-union concrete plant at one time.
And I have had a driver not working for the plant that I work for, but he was a hired truck driver who was killed by the union because he crossed a picket line. I am not a fan of unions and in my life, I have never had a government job and all of my work When I needed more money, I would either find something to do on the side or I would change jobs that paid more money. I feel sorry for these people because I'm sure they're going through tough times because most of these people probably voted for Joe Biden and this is why their cost of living has accelerated. And I do feel sorry for them and I do feel that if they would vote for Donald Trump a lot of this stuff will turn around overnight And I thank you, Board, very much for my time. Have a good day.
Okay does that close out public comment?
Chair Lavanino and members of the board we have no more requests to speak.
Okay we are going to take a 10-minute break and we'll be back with our departmental agendas. All right I'd like to call this meeting back to order And we will move to departmental item number one. Madam Clerk, can you please read that into the record?
1:34 – 1:4017 turns
Chair Lavinino, members of the board, departmental item number one is from the Treasurer Tax Collector Public Administrator. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding an amendment to section 3221 of the county code to include collection enforcement option for transient occupancy taxes.
OK. Good morning. Mr. Hagan. Good morning, Chair Lavinino, members of the board.
I'll
wait for the presentation. Bear with me, it's a long one.
And that's
it. All right so this item before you today is an amendment to County Code section 32-21 specifically that's the collection piece of the TOT ordinance and so slide next So the two items that we are proposing to include in this ordinance is the ability to file liens on people that aren't paying, which we do on the unsecured tax roll, which is about I think the current one's 44 million.
I think next year it's probably something close to 48. The other piece is seizures and we do that also on the unsecured role. We seize delinquencies and additionally We're proposing to clean up a section of this too, to make sure it's clear that the operator is responsible for the taxes whether collected or not collected. So that's a cleanup piece but the big pieces are the two action items right there on the slide and I'm here to answer any questions you may have on it.
Supervisor Williams? I'm just pleased that we are adding some tools in the toolbox to make sure that particularly SDR, short-term rental, DOT is being collected. So I am really pleased about that.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well, I want to echo that. And I guess we're likely to have more with the Ag Enterprise Ordinance than that anticipates if this board approves it some camping and that would be on Ag 2 properties as well as farmstays and then the Recreation Master Plan. We want to generate more revenue for the county and we want to make sure we have the tools to actually inform people and collect what's owing. So I think these are a big step, although liens are it's a lot of administrative effort to do that.
And I just wonder if there are more tools that you need, what direction we should be looking in to get ready for what's going to be even more STR type situations in the future?
Supervisor Hardman through the chair. I think these two proposals putting that into the code would certainly go a long ways to give me some teeth to be able to collect. If we are talking about enhancing the audit program and the collection program, we are in the process of promoting someone into that function right now within our office. And so we should be able to hopefully take on more work in that area.
I'd be hesitant to ask for more resources where I haven't deployed the resources I've been given yet. So, I think I'm fine with these tools here if we have someone that's reluctant to pay, let's put it that way.
And can you remind me for a while, I know we had a company that was looking at advertisements and trying to figure out whether they were actually permitted or not. What is the status of that now?
Supervisor Hartman through the chair. We do have a working agreement with a company, and they have uncovered several hundred potential short-term rentals that we have sent out a couple of letters to. We've had some good responses but we also have a list of people that we need to follow up on. I'm hesitant to say what the company is.
No, no, I'm not asking that. But that still exists. Yeah, dynamite to work with. Oh, good. And then there's the issue they need to get permits from P&D and they need to pay their taxes So, do you coordinate with P&D then when you identify people who aren't paying to see if they did get their permits? Because the big complaint that I get from constituents is there's unpermitted SDRs all over the Santa Ynez Valley and tremendous frustration about that.
Supervisor Hartman through the chair we do coordinate with planning and development on a monthly basis. Yeah, yeah. They send us information and we send them information but from my perspective whether it's permitted or not if they're renting I'm still going to collect but then we send that information over to planning development.
Right. Ideally we've got them permitted and then it's easier for you to know who and to collect but we're kind of working on both sides right now but just want to make sure they are coordinated. Well thank you for all your work. I think it's a work in progress but we're making some headway so thank you.
Supervisor Caps.
Yeah, thank you. I echo the support of this that my colleagues have shared and I just wanted to ask if you could elaborate a bit on the outreach because one benefit of having more tools is that you might not need to use them if you do a good job promoting this, you know, the enforcement is beefing up and so what kind of outreach? What happens to delinquent? How are you promoting this now amongst those who pay TOT?
1:40 – 1:5212 turns
So we do send out letters. We proactively try to contact people. Sometimes you just don't know that they need to do this, it's just not being educated in that but we do try to proactively contact people that we either discover on our own staff wise or The company we work with that actually they're mining other sources. And then sometimes it might be a neighbor complaining that they contact us and, you know, we'll contact them and initiate an audit.
Thanks.
Is there any request to speak from the public? Madam Clerk?
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board, we have no request to speak for this item.
Okay. Well, I'll accept the motion. So moved. Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor?
Aye.
Any opposed? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. All right, Madam Clerk can you please read departmental item number two into the record.
Chair Lavanino, members of the board, departmental item number two is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the second reading of a transient occupancy tax TOT increase ballot measure for November 2024 general election ballot. This item requires a forfeits vote.
Okay let's take a second looks like we're loading up
Good morning.
Good morning.
Chair Lavinio and members of the board, sorry for that I just had to pull up that PowerPoint. I'm here today to present the second reading of the ordinance to a proposal to increase the transient occupancy tax we also are asking for adoption That will include some ballot language, as this increase does require a vote of the county voters. So the purpose today is to adopt that second reading. We brought the first reading to you on June 18th.
That was approved. We will also adopt the resolution with the proposed ballot language. If you choose to do so, and make those CEQA findings. I will also be presenting some survey results from a poll that was done just a little less than three weeks ago. I do want to note in your packet that the final ordinance if and as adopted will be attached to the resolution as Exhibit A.
That wasn't put together in the packet that way but that's how it will be submitted to the elections office if approved. So a little bit of background just to set the context on what is a transient occupancy tax. We refer to it as TOT. It is paid by hotel and lodging guests, and in our county's case only in the unincorporated areas. And this does include short-term rentals.
A little bit about the history, our current rate of 12% was approved by the voters in 2016. That was an increase of 2% from 10 to 12 and then that 10% rate persisted for a couple decades from 1990 to 2016 and we first established the TOT in 1978 at 8%. As you can see here, I wanted to give we presented this before but wanted to give a comparison to the other jurisdictions in our county as well as the cities of Carpinteria, Bealton and Solvang's intention to also place a TOT increase on the November ballot.
Bealton and Solvang are proposing a 14% rate similar to the counties going from 12 to 14. And then Carpinteria is proposing to go from 12 to 15 percent Okay, moving on to the results from a survey that was conducted at the end of June. It was done by the public opinion research firm Fairbank, Maslin, Mullin, Metz and Associates or FM3. They also conducted a survey for us last fall in November. This was a dual mode survey meaning that it was done over telephone and online.
It was a county wide sample because we do this measure does require that all voters in the county vote on the measure It was done in Spanish and English. And we have a plus or minus 4% confidence, I'm sorry, plus or minus 4% at the 95% confidence level based on the number of surveys that were conducted at 653. So consistent with the survey that was conducted in November, most voters—meaning 60% in this case—believe that the county does have a significant need for additional funding.
You can see there the numbers are almost identical for great and some need. Equaling 60 percent. I think the great need went down just slightly in June, but is still hovering in the mid 20s and some some need at 34 percent. And so this is this is really the mood of the voters we wanted to to assess whether they felt like the county really did need some additional funding And then we tested example ballot language wording, and I'll get to the ballot language in just a couple slides.
But we actually read a 75-word statement and you'll see something very similar. In the resolution to the voters to see if they would vote Yes, or definitely probably yes, or definitely? Yes, or lean. Yes Are though are the variations that they're given as well as on the no end I mean you can see that 59% of the voters based on that language said Either leaned. Yes, sir. Said definitely. Yes with definitely. Yes being at 34 percent and Overall support for the county TOT measure also increased just slightly when we read some of the education statements and priorities about the types of things that our general fund and the TOT tax could fund.
And so, we got to 61% between the definitely and lean yes with 38% saying definitely yes So that was a change from what we saw in the fall with the sales tax poll. We feel like we have really good support there, 61. And this slide is the actual proposed ballot language that we've included in the resolution for your consideration today. This is very similar to the language that was read in the survey.
Things changed just slightly based on priorities that we heard from the voters and includes language that all the funds will be locally controlled. We are required to include how much money approximately the measure will generate, and we are ensuring that it's clear that this is paid only by hotel and short-term rental guests as well as only in the unincorporated areas.
I did want to draw your attention to a couple things. We are proposing to change a couple punctuation marks in this, none of the words but we wanted to remove the comma after maintaining 911 so that it would read maintaining 911 emergency communications. Change the comma after communications to a semicolon since that is one phrase on its own And then in addition, after addressing homelessness change that comma to a semicolon since that is a phrase on its own.
So I'm proposing to make those changes in the resolution for your consideration today. So remove the comma after 9-1-1, change the communications comma to a semicolon and after homelessness from a comma to a semicolon. So in conclusion, just wanted to bring a couple of things to light. We already spoke about the 60% of residents agree that the county needs additional funding, that same level of support is demonstrated for our proposed measure to raise the county's transient occupancy tax after being presented with that 75-word ballot measure language.
We also asked city residents whether support for a county tax is affected by the city's tax. As I noted, three cities are proposing an increase to their TOT as well as the City of Santa Barbara is proposing an increase to their sales tax and that didn't seem to affect support on either side for the city's ballot measure or for the county. The priorities as I stated, those are listed. Many of them are listed in our ballot language and our voters are definitely looking for or interested in money that's being raised locally to be spent locally.
So in sum these findings suggest that this measure is viable for the number 2024 election as a majority of the voters regard it a good way to provide funding as needed, as they believe is needed. So for next steps today if we approve—if you approve the ordinance and resolution that will go on to the elections office to be placed on And then we have a period of time for submitting direct arguments. You took action on June 18th to designate some board members to work on that.
August 12th is the election deadline. County Council will be providing an impartial analysis for the measure, and then on August 15th is another deadline. The resolution also asks the auditor controller to do a fiscal impact statement. Finally, so the recommended actions as I stated before to adopt that the ordinance adopt the resolution with that ballot language and then of course the CEQA findings.
And that is all for the presentation. I do have Rick Sklarz from FM3 is on Zoom. So if board members have more specific questions about the survey, the methodology and some of the findings he is available for for that as well. Thank you.
1:52 – 2:0215 turns
Questions? Supervisor Hurton.
Well, I think this is a good report. I am puzzled about you know that we have to have everybody vote throughout the county even though this only goes in effect in unincorporated county and how that was explained to the voters I mean, do people get that? Especially again as you mentioned in the cities where they're also built and solving and carpentry where they are putting forward a TOT measure. I wonder if somebody could elaborate
on that. Thank you, Supervisor Hartman through the chair. Yeah we did actually ask a specific question about whether people understood that their city would also be requesting or putting I'm sorry putting a ballot measure on So I'm going to go ahead and open it up for questions. Our consultant was actually very impressed with the number of people that understood that they lived in the unincorporated county. And so our voters are clear about where they live, it appears from our poll and survey and so I think we feel confident about those results.
And did you learn anything in the polling that will guide us in our education about this measure?
Thank you for that question. Yeah, that's part of the reason why we do the polling too right is to understand. How voters are feeling, what their priorities are. And so we certainly did and we are working on some of that information and compiling it so that we will be able to properly educate the public about this increase and how much funding it will generate and where that funding could go.
Does the language we have pretty much parallel the language in the three cities? I only ask because I used to, in my day, we had to diagram sentences. I'm utterly defeated by this. But it was a really good exercise. I mean so there's, you know, a noun and verb and then what follows in here you know we so it's just so I understand there's a lot of legalities and we've got only a few words 75 words we can get in but Boy, it's an awkward sentence to understand what you're really asking the voters. So our education I
think can simplify it. Thank you Supervisor Hartman and that is the reason we do use sample ballot language when we are polling to get a sense of do people understand what we are asking and what we are trying to achieve It is an art. We did labor over almost every word we worked really closely with County Council and our Consultant to to put this language together to answer your question about whether it's similar to the cities The city of Santa Barbara in the City of Solvang have a similar structure The city of Built-ins is a little more It's it's more It's straightforward in terms of like just which ordinance they're amending and what it's for. It doesn't include any of the funding priorities, but for the most part across the state this is the type of language that we're seeing in ballot measures.
And then you and I discussed this but if it could be left justified, I think at least when I submit stuff to elections they just take the file and put it up. So I think it reads a lot better in our board letter than it does with those big spaces for some reason that puts me off of it.
Thank you for that. In the resolution I checked it is left And so we'll ensure that. Perfect, thank you. Little things but it matters. Thank you.
Supervisor Caps?
Yeah thank you Ms. Oderman for this very clear presentation and to the work of the consultants. I do like to wordsmith and that's why I hear you Supervisor Hartman with your questions but I do believe there is a science to this and so I had some questions about 75 words Why the parentheses and et cetera, et cetera. And those were satisfied because there is some proven results and in fact I think one of the consultants that's worked on this is working with us on this has a 90% success rate on getting these things passed so the language really matters and I'm glad we have experts who have guided this process. I'm in full support.
Supervisor Nielsen?
Yes thank you Chair Labadino. I guess my question, I've got a few questions but one for the CO's office. The additional revenue that is going to be created potentially by the passage of this ordinance would that be subject to the 18% policy we have on our deferred maintenance? We're being very careful with our words here, saying such as these uses. And many of our general fund dollars are all fungible, right? We can move them from one thing to another and so we can move money that we currently spend on gang prevention and 911 services and potholes and fund it with these dollars and then take those dollars and move them over to maybe potential raises for employees.
I know we're trying to wordsmith this to get the public support but I want to get some assurances for the public that if they do move forward with this, this isn't just manipulation but this is actually funding some of these things that we're outlining here. So could you speak a little bit to the budget team and the county's Efforts to actually deliver some of these things that are on.
Supervisors through the Chair, so it's a good question. Your policy right now on the deferred maintenance funding says that if there is any unallocated general revenue which this would be after board policy items which include the Northern Branch Jail, funding salaries and benefit requirements, pension requirements Any of the debt obligations, any of the board policy items that we have to fund. Any unallocated revenue after that gets distributed such that 18% goes to maintenance and so the question you have is whether the county's revenue sources are enough to cover our requirements and if this is additional amount After that, so if we have enough revenue to cover our requirements per board policy then yes the 18% would be taken from this amount.
So that's and that's the question so that's why I can't answer absolutely yes or no because it's going to depend each year on depending on what our budget says.
So I think it just goes to my overall concern that you know we wordsmith this thing to get the voters to move forward with it. You know I sometimes wonder if we were If we made it more mundane of what actually a lot of our county work is, if anybody would approve an increase there which you could look at it both ways as one of them being a positive versus the other. You obviously want to sell some of the more sexy things that we do in county government that people really want and maybe we undersell Some of the necessary dirty things that we have to get done to keep an organization this large going. And $3 million is a lot of money out there in public, I kind of reject the idea that this is just kind of found money. I think that the elasticity here on this type of stuff can impact what people eventually spend Or whether they choose to come to these areas.
And I know 2% seems like a little bit, but we're kind of making a bet that it's gonna produce more revenue and I'm not sure about that. That's why my preference always when we're looking at these things is first have we done everything we can to grow the pie before we took a bigger slice? And I think there's still a lot more that we can be doing in this county.
I do think we're making efforts to those ends, but I think that there's still a lot more that we could be doing whether it's with approving projects and planning, streamlining the process and then also just growing our own I know that Supervisor Hartman has been working hard on some of that and I think we all are in favor of trying to create more revenue opportunities out there, really growing the pie instead of just taking a bigger slice.
Especially at a time when you know we know that the cost of services are going up in other places. Some of our hotels run on very thin margins and that 2% makes a difference on whether they get potentially You know, conferences and other issues that come into our community which has other multiplier effects. So you know I'm at this point still not supportive of this but like I said I've been saying I'll be watching from the cheap seats and seeing how the voters move forward.
2:02 – 2:3419 turns
Thank you Supervisors. Deteriorating bridges, we have huge bridge loans from General Fund to roads for those. One-time monies all the time for transportation infrastructure, addressing homelessness et cetera so I just want to point out even though I talked about the board has certain policies of things that are required a lot of these things in here you're completely at your discretion that you fund now and part of this measure was to get additional discretionary money to continue those things that you do.
Madam Clerk any requests to speak from the public?
Chair Lavanino, members of the board we have no request to speak for this
item.
I'll entertain a motion.
I move A and B in the staff report today. And I second.
Along with C that it's not part of CEQA? Yes.
And also with the grammatical changes yes
okay.
Sorry I'm on the wrong page so you're right. So let's just make sure.
A through C. A through C yep okay A through
I think CEO Miyasato pointed out, can the maker of the motion include those revisions as well? Yeah. Thank you.
Okay so was the maker of the motion that you're going to include the revisions?
Indeed.
Indeed okay is there a second? Second by Supervisor Caps let's do a roll call vote please.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion that you're going to include the revisions? Indeed. Indeed okay is there a second? Second by Supervisor Caps let's do a roll call
Show transcript
Motion passes four to one. That
takes us to a departmental item number three madam clerk can you please read that into the record
Chair Lavanino, members of the board. Departmental item number three is from the county excuse me it's from the fire department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Fire Safe Council and Santa Barbara County Fire Department fuel reduction and wildlife prevention activities
Good morning. Good morning, Supervisor Lavanina. How are you? And supervisors. We're doing well today. I think this is a timely topic considering what's happening in the county at this point. I'll start with saying that Supervisor Hartman had requested this agenda item, and really to highlight what the local Fire Safe Council has been doing through the county in partnership with Santa Barbara County Fire.
I am gonna steal a little bit of time. I promise to take about 15 minutes of this presentation to address in 2019 Retired now, former fire marshal Rob Hazzard made a lengthy presentation at the request of the board at the time in regard to the fire problem that we had in the county. It was pretty significant and throughout the state. And we were directed to come back with a plan and I apologize because it's five years later and now we're gonna discuss what we've been doing, right?
I'll make some introductions. I'm the newest Fire Marshal, Fred Tien. I've got sitting next to me the Executive Director for the Fire Safe Council Ann Marie Parkinson and it's a little thin on the fire department side today because we have a couple things going on but I've got Captain Dustin McKibbin. He is what we call callsign VMP30, the pre-fire engineer and he almost directly works for CAL FIRE as a conduit to make sure all our projects are accounted for and allocated and have environmental documents properly filed.
We have a lot of other people out there working, but we'll talk through that through this presentation. I'm gonna take some slides from Chief Hazard's 2019 presentation as we go through. Just as a broad brush, so we have what's called responsibility areas in this county. The green is federal responsibility area The gray is local responsibility area, a lot of the cities, unincorporated county, Goleta, Lompoc-Solvang. And the yellow is state lands which Santa Barbara County Fire is contracted by CAL FIRE to protect.
A lot of our fuel reduction efforts that we engage in as a fire department Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. Local partners including Fire Safe Council, Montecito, Santa Barbara, Carpinteria. They all have a lot of fuel reduction efforts in their areas and we also support when we can the Forest Service. We have about just under 800,000 acres of SRA lands that we protect and conduct fire prevention efforts on and there's just over I believe 850,000 acres of forest service lands.
The Lake Fire started in FRA would you call it? And spread into the SRA State Responsibility Area and is mostly an SRA at this point. Just as a reminder, you know this is the front country. This is the front country but these are the issues that we face in Santa Barbara County topographical extremes weather extremes The fuel challenge that presents to us because we don't, we largely live in a non-built environment. If you go to Orange County and San Diego County have a lot of infill, a lot of freeways and I think that's why a lot of people live here because it's not a completely built environment and we have a lot natural beauty and a lot natural forest that we want to protect and live with If you, this is from 2018 and that's with intent.
We do have new maps with more fires but this was the map that Chief Hazard had in his presentation and you can tell even by at that point This county has always had a history of littered with wildland fire. And since 2018 and even before that, we really have made a concerted effort to take steps to live with the wildfire. In 2019, we had the Alsop Fire in 2020 statewide Five of the six largest fires burned that year.
And I believe the Thomas fire is in on this as well, but some of the fires at Alisal, obviously the Lake Fire's not on this graphic. We bring this graphic up. As you can tell, these are one of the things that Dustin is in charge of throughout the county as a contract county, it's a unit fire plan and we're under contract with CAL FIRE to keep our fires, 95% of our fires under 10 acres or less.
As a result, we take a data-driven approach and as you can see here most of our fires occur along a lot of roadways and highways. And so most of our unit fire plan is focused towards mitigating a lot of fuel reduction efforts just prior to fire season in a lot of roads, Rufufio Road, Paradise Stagecoach, Painted Cave Road. As I say that, I know Chris Sneddon is in the back here County Roads is a partner in that as well and they've been working on a lot of those roads. We've been in communication this spring, I'm sure you got the supervisors have been getting contacted by your constituents as well.
I'll say county fire is a bit behind on our road maintenance and a lot of that's because there has been significant fire activity throughout the state which is quite a bit more than there was last year And quite a bit more in county than there was last year. But County Roads, I can speak to their efforts. They have been working diligently. They've been a good partner with County Fire and we're in constant communication as well as the Fire Safe Council who's been active with a lot of their projects and when it comes to that portion of the presentation, I'll let Ann Marie speak to that.
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public for joining us today. So the goals and objectives that we have when it comes to fuel reduction efforts in the county align a lot with the governor's task force. The governor created a task force as these large fires were burning, it's the Wildfire and Resiliency Task Force. I'll mention his name again because Chief Hazard was not only a great mentor, but probably one of the only people that knows every inch of this county and the threat that fire can present to it. And he served on this task force as a presenter, as a contributor. So the Governor's Task Force came up with a lot of action plans.
An action plan they drafted in January of 2021. As a result of that, the state was charged with reducing fuels by 2025, 500,000 acres of fuel annually by 2025. The Forest Service was also charged with reducing 500,00 acres of fuel by 2025 per year with a goal of 100,000 acres of prescribed fire. And those would be shared, all that acreage would be shared through a lot of county agencies including Cal Fire, all the contract counties, the Cal Fire units, state parks, Caltrans and then on the side of the federal government, a lot of their efforts on their side.
We take a lot of these A lot of our goals and objectives, number one is to ensure safe separation distance for firefighters. Because if we can get that, we can ensure safe separation distance for firefighters that they can make access into a firefight and have a safe area between themselves and a home or resources at risk. we can engage and mitigate a lot of the risk to homes, and ensure that they come home at the end of the fire.
A lot of the things that we're doing right now through grant funding is maintaining and creating community defensible space. We'll discuss that in some later slides. I'm gonna skip over a couple of things. Also, part of our objectives is to maintain the priority fire plan projects that we have in our unit fire plan because there are a lot of roads and with a lot of focus on new prescribed fire projects.
We also endeavor, and this is part of the task force's report is to complete and ensure that residents are compliant with defensible space. The Fire Safe Council also has a program which takes that a little bit further, but our defensible space efforts have proven, and fuel reduction efforts have proven to be successful as you heard from Chief Stornetta today We've so far not lost any homes. In the Santa Ynez Valley, we have a really good history of compliance in those communities and at this time we have a lot of out-of-county fire engines sitting in front of homes in the Santa Ynez Valley Happy Canyon in those communities to be able to defend a home and make sure that if fire starts making their way through light fuels that we're gonna be able to make a good firefight to save homes.
And a lot of these things that we're doing, and Anne-Marie and I will touch on it as well is, a lot of these things that we're able to do right now is through the CAL FIRE Fire Prevention Fund. The grant program that they have through the California Climate Investments Partnership. We've been able to maintain and start a lot of new projects because there's funding from CAL FIRE This metric just kind of shows our part, there's six total contract counties.
I'm not trying to throw anyone under the bus. I just want to show like with the amount or with an amount of resources that we have which is across the county is fairly thin these are This is the amount of acres in the state that we protect. So Santa Barbara County, we have roughly 800,000 acres of SRA. There's another 140,000 acres of LRA that will get engaged in efforts with but you know The amount of fuels crews and the workforce that we have, this is kind of an inordinate ratio.
Only Curtin County, they've got close to two million acres of SRA and a much smaller staff that struggles a little bit more. Acres treated but even with that one of the, I'm kinda proud to say that Cal Fire Cal Fire kind of considers us one of their star pupils. Even with that, you could see our efforts in regards to fuel reduction in the county and prescribed fire in the county.
We've been a leader. They consider us a leader. That hasn't always been the case when I used to do Captain McKibbin's job. We were, because of the politics, because of the seats at the table that some of the other larger counties had. We weren't generally regarded as being a strong player but with our efforts and with our planning and some of the expertise that we have right now in the county and in the fire department, we're able to conduct a lot of fuel reduction and with also the grant funding that we've been able to get And this is one of the metrics that the task force did identify.
Concentrating on defensible space efforts, home hardening. I think that's been successful. We're still in the early stages of the home hardening efforts as far as any funding that's gonna come from the state and grant funding but we have had a concerted effort within this county through the fire department to go out and ensure that homes are compliant And we have some partnerships with Montecito because they have some SRA lands in their jurisdiction that they'll go and do inspections on, and also Carp Summerlin. But because of that, that's the number of inspections that we do annually with a pretty small staff.
Some of our challenges in this county is through some of those personnel and resource ratios. We have a lot of SRA, we have a lot of FRA state lands and federal lands so that creates a lot of hazardous areas where fires can start. And if those abut next to communities then we have a lof risk that could result from that. But that's why we have targeted and strategic fuel reduction projects out in the county so we can mitigate ignitions and hopefully reduce the size of fires.
Funding is an issue, and funding is an issue with almost every government agency. Funding's an issue. And that's why the grant funding has been so important to the fire department and also to the Fire Safe Council We talked a little bit about staffing versus the acres protected. Other challenges include succession planning and experience. Once you let the genie out of the bottle for prescribed fire, it's really hard to put that fire back in the bottle.
We just have a revolving door. So does the Forest Service, so does every fire agency having that type of expertise to be able to have successful prescribed fires and I think right now we are close to if not close to the top of our game at the top of our game in regards to that. Not to say that we haven't had some missteps but when we engage in a prescribed fire project We do that with the best management practices. We collaborate with APCD, we collaborate with NOAA, the National Weather Service to make sure that we have the weather in our favor but whether it's something that we can't always control but I would say that almost all of the days that we've burned in Santa Barbara County has been successful with the exception of one We didn't have any injuries that day.
We didn't really have, we did protect commercial interests as well as residential interest and that project is actually adjacent to the Lake Fire at this point. And you know data getting data is still Something that we struggle with but we're working on. That's a struggle with all the county, but using a data-driven and balanced approach with all the stakeholders including commercial, residential, all the other governmental agencies including CAL FIRE and the Forest Service Those are some challenges, there's a lot of challenges we can mitigate through the partnerships that we've created.
One of the big things that is in our favor is CAL FIRE is now really on our side. The next slide will show some of the grants that we've been able to get through County Fire. In 2019, we were awarded the Lompoc Valley Fuel Reduction Grant It's 2.2 million acres that included 18 miles of roadside fuel reduction and maintenance, 15 miles of a fuel break in the Prisma Valley and we have some photos of that.
After that grant, a couple years after that grant we were able to successfully get the Tepeskay VMP Grant. In that grant we are doing a lot of community defensible space and we also have about 3,000 acres of prescribed fire that we're targeting for the end of the year. CAL FIRE through some good budget years was also able able to award all its units and contract counties with direct award funds.
We were able to use that to bolster our prescribed fire program, and use that to fund a little bit of new equipment but mostly staffing so that we made sure that we had staffing in the stations as we conducted sometimes week-long prescribed fire projects. And then we also have the Lompoc Valley Phase 2 grant that we have a submittal for. That project is going to, after about five years, a lot of the projects that we have become will regrow Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Just a couple, some descriptions of what we're doing here. So this was the first large grant project or second large grant project. We did have a $360,000 grant project in Mission Canyon where we did some roadside fuel reduction, some targeted fuel treatments up above Mission Canyon. We had difficulty during the Haze-Zeta fire accessing, making access to it but Some of the work that we've done to reduce fuels above Mission Canyon, Southern California Edison is going to be improving some roads there hopefully for us on their end of the world.
But all that will improve access, improve firefighter safety and At some point, fires will start again back in the forest and that's kind of true today. But the Lompoc Valley Fuel Reduction Project we've treated 434 acres since inception and that's where the fuels crew through this project we were able to start a fuels crew program. My new Deputy Farm Marshal Vince Ferrocco I decided to duck out on a medical injury after we got this grant, but he and some other extra help expertise that we brought on were able to start a fuels crew. It's been highly successful. They work 48 weeks out of the year to reduce fuel in the Lompoc Valley and also Also in the Tepescape project, there's just some examples of what they've done.
On the Prisma Ridge, some supervisors have been up there to view this but in the Prisma Ridge, this 15 mile area that the fuels crew engaged in with some contractors, you had a lot of native bishop pines that were only about two inches in diameter and you couldn't see off either side of the ridgeline If we had a fire here, it would have been continuous fuel bed with a lot of dead material down below.
Really would have been difficult for firefighters to send firefighters in there with low visibility not knowing if they had an entry point. After today, there is some regrowth in that area but after the treatment it's much more of a natural healthy forest environment. This is what most of that 15 mile fuel break looks like. The pines have more room, more sunlight to grow, aren't competing for water so and that's another one of the goals of the plan was to have healthier forests as a result of our actions And then we also have a lot of right-of-way clearances that we conducted. As I said, somewhere around 85% of our ignitions in this county start along the roadside so that right-of way treatments are big, are a major portion of most strategic fire plans throughout the state but this is Harris Grade Road and this is before and after shot.
Our other, this is the Tepeskay VMP. This is a $6.7 million grant that we had obtained from CAL FIRE. So far we've done about 717 acres of targeted fuel reduction in that area. Mostly a lot of roadside and community defensible space. That in, In conjunction with the successful fuel reduction the homeowners are doing, the last time I looked there was 42 homeowners out of 45 were compliant with defensible space requirements.
And Supervisor Nelson through the Chair this addresses some of your question about how is Tepeskaya going to be impacted? If you look at some of the things that, well I thought I had some pictures of Tepescue but apparently I don't. I apologize. The road looks much much better. We are getting so many kudos as an agency from the work that the fuels crew is doing out there to improve the access, to improve the community defensible space where now we can be comfortable It's a great opportunity for us to be able to do good work, defend properties and then hopefully engage the fires directly.
One of the projects, this Spaulding Midland VMP project is in the heart of the St. Ann's Valley out on Figaro Mountain Road. We conducted most of this through the direct award fund. We had to cut it up into very small pieces to make it manageable So that we could start a burn, maybe 200 acres to 400 acres and then be able to stop the project so that we didn't impact into the inversion layer. Right now the lake fire kind of borders it to the north And the west, and just to the right side of it we do have an approved prescribed fire project. It's about 1800 acres in the Sedgwick Preserve so that we were also gonna attempt to engage with that this year.
TREX which is a prescribed fire training exchange by ordinance all counties and state agencies are supposed engaged TRECs to increase the bandwidth and the learning and the experience for prescribed fire. So we have a lot of practitioners from out-of-the-state, within-the-state, tribal Tribal members that come to participate in this, in the TREX program where they're scheduled. They had a really successful burn last year in the Sedgwick Preserve and they're coming out again this November to build upon that and we generally assist with that to engage with again tribal membership and to make sure that we're getting that experience out there in regards to prescribed fire.
For about five to 10 years, there was a prescribed fire ban. And as I speak to the experience of putting fire on the ground, we were one of the first ones coming out of that prescribed fire ban to be able to put fire on the ground and we did that on the Bar M Ranch. It's really hard because you have to get, in periods where there's a lot of fire in the county everyone is really nervous.
All the stakeholders are very nervous. Can we hold it? Are we gonna get away? Again Vince Rocco who was my Deputy Farm Marshal, we were counterparts at the time created a really good plan for the Bar M project I think that was a good staging point for our future projects and burns, and also for the state to start burning as well. Because a lot of our partners throughout the state started calling us and asking us how did you guys do it?
What did you guys put into that project? What kind of paperwork did you do? So we're still assisting other counties and at some point, we might need them to help us as well. In the front country a lot of targeted fuel reduction work so we've had some, we are waiting to start a project in Goleta. They obtained a Cal Fire grant as well and we have a, Through just our funding, this is just an example of one of our fire plan projects. So San Antonio Creek, there's a lot of fuel reduction efforts and we maintain it around Tucker's Grove.
Just a lot of areas in there. And then we also go help in Mission Canyon, and so does the Fire Safe Council. But there's projects, really targeted strategic projects throughout the front country. This is a project, Fire Safe Council Project Southcoaster Bivary and I'll let Ann Marie talk a little bit about that. But so far they've got 443 acres of that project completed.
And the Fire Safe Council has taken, as a good partner, has taken some of our responsibilities away. So through a grant they started a chipping program and they engaged the communities, Mission Canyon being one of them, Montecito, Carp Summerlin, a lot of the impacted communities and they'll schedule chipping days. It used to be that the fire crew We'd have to send the fire crew in to go and do shipping days, and it really wasn't very efficient use of the fire crew. But this has allowed the fire crew to go out and either maintain a lot of our fire plan projects or go to fires.
But this is a really efficient and good partnership that we have with the Fire Safe Council. And with that I'll turn it over to Ann Marie.
2:34 – 2:511 turns
Thank you, Fred. Like Fred said my name is Ann Marie Parkinson I am the Executive Director of the Santa Barbara County Fire Safety Council. I was actually hired as a first staff member back in 2021 as a project manager but have been the executive director for a little over a year now I'm thankful that Fred let me tag onto his time today to use this opportunity to share about the Fire Safe Council. I recognize not many people know who we are, so just share about our programs or services, how we're working to be a leader for wildfire coordinated wildfire mitigation efforts in the county and also be a role model for the fire safe councils across these states.
Just want to go into a bit of background about the Fires Council. We are a 501c3, established over 25 years ago back in 1997 with the same mission that we have today which is to promote wildfire safety through education and action. Fires councils in general are established to help provide a connection between the communities who have fire risk and agencies who have the resources to help mitigate those risks.
We are also the only Fires Council in the county which has its advantages and disadvantages, but a huge advantage being we don't have to fight for the same limited funds to provide the same programs, hire staff to do the same services, support the same operational needs. And so it allows us to be more efficient in providing programs across the county and not duplicating efforts.
For the first 25 years, we were run by an all-volunteer board. And there's not great history on the grants and programs the Vice Council had before but we know of at least three notable grants that provided about $300,000 of funds to support three projects And now in just a little under three short years, we actually as of two weeks ago have seven full-time staff members and three summer interns. We manage 10 grants that bring in $10.3 million dollars in funds from 2021 through 2029 and these grants help support 11 programs and have or will support 7 projects.
I don't know how to go back. Cool. So as you can see, we've grown quite significantly in just three years. Went from zero to 100, part of which is in thanks to Supervisor Hartman who a couple years ago attended the Board of Directors meetings back when the board wasn't super active and thankfully she saw the potential of the organization and helped push the board to become one that was more proactive, one that was willing to accept the risk associated with taking on grants and hiring staff And that's allowed us to take advantage of all these funds that have been coming down through the state the past couple years. They've released a lot of funds recently and so nonprofits inherently are a little more nimble and flexible, so we took advantage of this opportunity with our more proactive board and it helps fill in gaps across the county in terms of providing services and promoting education And so I want to talk about some of our programs just so you all are aware of what we do and how it can fit in the county and fretting services, maybe potential partners that we haven't connected with yet.
So we have three landscape-based grants. One is a $2.1 million shipping grants to encourage residents to create defensible space by removing their cut vegetation for free and also provide some tag and trim work along roadways This is for South County right now that services 35 communities from Hollis Ranch to Montecito. To date we've removed 1,500 tons of vegetation and which supplied for a CAL FIRE grant earlier this year to provide shipping for one year in North County for Sabata Canyon, Hanada Springs some areas in the Santa Ynez Valley but always looking to continuously finding funding for this program it is very important to the communities they participate very actively just want to keep that going for them Also have a $1.9 million grazing grants, where as Fred has mentioned we've grazed over 450 acres so far and also with the grant which is submitted to CAL FIRE looking to expand this 350 acres of grazing into North County next year.
Our last landscape-based grant is to provide community level defensible space, or defensible space for low income residents who would face no significant financial burden to pay a landscaper to come in and do the work for them. This is one time grant unfortunately from Cal Fire but it continues looking for funding to keep this going. It is really important but also really hard to find funding from grants that support work on private property But important because of low-income residents who can't do the defensible space, because fire is a shared risk. It does put their entire community at risk and so we can help with community level risk reduction by helping these residents and this is a countywide grant.
And we think they got some funds from SC&E to keep this going in the next couple years but not to the extent that this first grant provides and because it is an SC grants for the future they can only we can only do work in S&E territory which is primarily South County We have one bill environment program that helps do low-cost retrofits such as vent upgrades, sealing in small gaps and cracks for low income residents.
State funds so far do not support home hardening efforts and so very thankful SC&E is getting more into philanthropy and they're helping to support these efforts again only for South County residents this has been SC& E territory We have five community engagement and education programs. I'd say the one I'm most proud of is our focus group program, where we have been hosting small discussion sessions with disadvantaged communities so they can understand the impacts that they had during wildfires and understand the barriers they're facing when trying to prepare for wildfires.
I'd say this is one of our most valuable ones, just getting to know these communities. So far the fire risk really is more so in the mountains. Disadvantaged communities tend to live more in the valleys. It's been fantastic to connect with them and understand their risks and needs so we can work with them on how to become more fire safe. We recognize that they're wary of outsiders and that's what we are to them.
And so we really went into hosting these focus groups with the intention of using it as an opportunity to build long-term trust. Instead, a lot of groups use focus groups as opportunities to get information and then people never tend to hear back from them. So we provided gift cards to all the participants. We have a native Spanish speaking staff member who called every single participant after the focus group to thank them for their time, ask if they had anything else they wanted to share And he's been working with all locations where we've hosted the focus groups to do follow-up workshops. So we continue to be a face within the community and as we build up our resources and our education that we can provide, we can then go back and try the research that they have specifically asked for.
And so it's been a very successful program. We've done 14 so far right now in South County. We just got funds to do more which will expand to North County We've completed an analysis of the focus groups with a social scientist and have organized a meeting with several key agency representatives to share with them what local residents are saying, and talk about how can we work with them and each other to help overcome these barriers that they have expressed that they are facing.
We have a, just got a $1.5 million grant to create and teach more comprehensive wildfire education. So often wildfire education focuses on home hardening and defensible space for homeowners but homeowners are not the only ones impacted by wildfire and the loss of a house is not the only way people are negatively impacted by wildfire. And so we wanted to create a more comprehensive education for wider audiences, such as curriculum for landscape architects and landscapers on defensible space.
So they can have more informed conversations with their clients who can make more informed decisions about how to make their properties more fire safe. We're also using these funds to hire more staff to go out and teach. Currently one staff member with a lot of other responsibilities who does their local teaching, so just hiring more staff to go out and teach means we reach more people We also organize large community events that are all open to the public. Our most recent one was really successful down at SBCC where we talked about wildfire evacuation and survival, basically went over some basic fire ecology so people can then use that information to understand how to apply that if they ever get trapped in a Potentially get trapped during evacuation.
So to help them make those potentially life-and-death decisions and so we've gotten commitment from the fire agencies, from the Fire Chiefs to work with their PIO's to help plan these events in the future and looking forward to doing at least one each year alternating between North and South County and different jurisdictions to use that as an opportunity to reach more people that Fires Council or the fire agencies or OEM haven't reached before And get them involved in being more fire safe.
We also conduct free home evaluations for residents in support of county fire. We help out with this because they have many homes to inspect. So far, we've done 200 of these. These take my staff maybe an hour and a half. And that's how much time we spend with the homeowner about 45 minutes just walking around the house getting on our hands and knees inspecting the home.
And it really encourages people to work on making their home more fire safe because they don't know something is at risk. They don't know how to fix it. And our last community-based program is using the National FireWise USA framework. I'd say it's also my favorite program, and I think it's also our most important one that we offer by far. FireWise essentially provides a framework for communities to get organized, to identify their wildfire risk, and to work together to mitigate that risk over time.
And I say it's the most important because Fireways results in the creation of a network of more engaged and connected residents. So we can work towards community scale wildfire risk reduction, so not just helping individual homeowners scattered out across the landscape or working with entire communities. And I'd say as a result of Fireways all the programs I mentioned before have been really successful because of that program.
Those communities utilize more of our programs than non-Fireways communities for our chipping for example We see a lot more engagement and tonnage being removed in these communities. They also ask for a lot more home evaluations. We get a lot of people from fire waste communities attending our events because we have this large connected network of residents, and they work on increasing the engagement of their neighbors over time.
And it's been really inspiring to see this work that these people are putting into being more fire safe at a community scale. Because again, fire is a community-scale risk and fire agencies can't guarantee to save all homes, can't guarantee get everyone out and the community needs to do their part in being part of the solution to be more fire safe. And this is a way that they do that and we can provide more resources and connections to them.
And so before the Fires Council got started, there were zero fireways communities in the county. Now there are 16, two of which are in North County. Within these communities includes about 3,700 people, 1,600 homes and almost 20,000 acres So that was it for our more external programs. We do have two internal ones, one is a county coordinator program. This was thought of by the State Fire Council and funded by the state legislator. It was started because so much money's coming down to support wildfire mitigation efforts but they recognize there is really a lack in collaboration and coordination in counties to be efficient enough duplicate efforts. And so they created this position or not position fund for the county coordinator that goes to one organization in each county To essentially know who's doing what, when and where.
And what are the barriers these groups are facing in providing their services? So last year Rob Hazard submitted for the Board of Supervisors to have the Fires Council be that central coordinating agency which you all approved. And so in that time we've been doing just that working with meeting with agencies organizations across the county to learn what they're doing, barriers they're facing and how they can better work with us or with each other to be more collaborative I'd say our last program is the Regional Wildfire Abnegation Program, another internal one.
So this one essentially provides a collaborative and holistic approach to wildfire resilience through built environments, landscaping, community programming. It is another program thought of by Max Moritz who is a State Fire Specialist with UC A&R and Rob Hazard after the Thomas fire recognizing The current approach to wildfire mitigation planning, which are primarily CWPPs just aren't sufficient. A lot of efforts focus on just landscape treatments, education focused on home hardening and the mental space for homeowners but if the goal is wildfire resilience those approaches aren't enough.
And so they developed this program that is meant to be more holistic and all-encompassing looking at risks in the built environments and the landscape and the community Because they are all interconnected. And then it also prioritizes looking at communities that are not just in the walled and unwritten interface, but all communities across the county which is why we've been doing focus groups with disadvantaged communities in the low-lying non-fire risk areas or low fire risk areas And so we've been using this as a model that other counties can adapt to work internally and with their own unique regions to become more fire safe in a more collaborative approach.
And so a big component of this program is it's meant to be a program, not a plan like a CWPP. And so it has this ongoing planning and analysis stage while also doing implementation at the same time. So we're not stuck in two plus years Just planning and thinking about how to become more fire safe. We're actively working to be more fire safe while trying to be more strategic and efficient over time.
Just a few projects I'll go through quickly, we're soon starting a CWPP in the Lompoc Valley. Mapping social vulnerability because census tract information is just too coarse to be reliable when trying to look at planning and prioritizing where projects should go. Working with the fire agencies and other organizations on aggregating all of the field treatments and landscape data that has been done across the county so residents have one central location they can go to, to understand what work has been done around their community We have completed a home hardening portal with educational videos that is bilingual.
I've also created videos on how to do event retrofits, that is also bilingual and I've completed a CWPP for the Gaviota Coast and a wonderful defense space video featuring Rob Hazard that plays on one of the local stations so if you ever miss him you can just go there I'll skip this slide for sake of time. Future direction, looking to get more involved in North County. Like I said we went from zero to 100 very quickly and had to focus on an area that was a little bit more sustainable for us as we've grown but now that we have more funds we're more sustainable. Looking to get more involved and provide services across the whole county.
Also looking to be a leader in encouraging wildfire resilience efforts so encouraging collaboration amongst all the agencies organizations so we can work together on this problem One way we're looking to do this is through establishing an advisory council where key partners work together, meet frequently to work on planning, on implementation, on writing grants. This comes from a model that other five councils in other counties have done really just to keep in touch so we can all work on fire mitigation projects and a great goal in the future as we get more established and have a more robust working group is going for large federal grants to be able to do things like infrastructure projects for roads that are hard to get funded through the states.
And just some of our challenges. Capacity currently, we're probably maxed out with the grants we can manage at this point but it doesn't mean that work should stop. Funds should stop coming into the county through nonprofits and other groups so that's kind of where the coordination comes in identifying groups what they're working on what their issues are. We can maybe identify hey there is this great grant we can't take it on but maybe Botanic Garden CEC someone else can take on that opportunity so we continue to work towards risk mitigation in the county As we all know, there's a budget deficit with the states and we're already seeing that through CAL FIRE who is our largest funder. I believe that's County Fire's largest funder for a lot of their projects.
They cut grants this year 40% with not much notice. That cuts probably continue next year which overall just means less funds coming into the county to make it more fire resilient. And I'd say an internal challenge for the Fires Council is all of our programs are grant funded, probably 99%. We are grant funded. And so with the state funds reduced that's less funds for us to be able to continue providing the programs that we have and providing them countywide. So it's just something that we're working on internally.
And some more partners collaborators and funders and just my email up there for everyone. Sorry that was a little fast. I wanted to be respectful of everyone's time. It is lunch I'm very hungry.
2:51 – 3:0012 turns
With that, we're open to questions if there are any. Okay.
Open
to questions.
Supervisor Williams?
Well, I just wanted to thank your work both of your work in Mission Canyon especially but all the neighborhoods under in the First District. The other One of the, I mean as borne out by the number of acres compared to what has happened in other communities and the number of programs compared to what has happened in other communities. You're truly leading the way.
One of the questions though that comes up from folks that are worried about it is kind of what steps do you all take to make sure that when there is a you know, in a larger area that is prescribed burn. That the reestablishment is native flora. So what are the kind of steps to make sure that happens?
Typically, the basic tenets of prescribed fire is that when we conduct a project we can do it with lower intensity. Lower intensity fire we could target and we can almost dial that in you know so if there are some oak trees that are in the way or like are in the project we can reduce intensity to those areas. And in some stands, we can actually increase intensity on a fire like the Lake Fire today or this week you can't do that so you're gonna end up if you don't have prescribed fire projects and we design them with that mind is to reduce fuel, to improve the ecology, to improve the health of the forest And I think it's important for us to have strategic defensible space for communities.
So we can dial that in, if we have the expertise and are planning appropriately, we can really design a project with all of that in mind and then not impact the community, on a 24-hour basis, like they're impacting right now up in the San Ynez Valley. And into Santa Barbara really as I drove out last night to L.A., yeah there was smoke and ash coming down in Santa Barbara so that's kind of how we did it.
And the reduction of intensity both has the value of keeping some tree species alive but also I would imagine with this lower intensity In the chaparral, especially if you're kind of farther removed from mustard and other stuff that you're going to be reestablished with a native chaparral because it's low intensity burn.
The native chaparral tends to come back much better when we design projects that way. And it's an important part of the project so the Thomas Fire When I came in, we viewed you know if you look at some of the fires that were in that area. The Thomas Fire once it hit the other fire scars, the Hayes Zeta fire scar, it started slowing down in the healthier stands of Chaparral you know so.
If you look on the north end of the lake right now there's some portions of the lakefire they're hitting the Zacca fire scar and kind of getting checked up in that area as well So there is some value to prescribed fire projects.
Supervisor Hartman.
Well, I'm so glad you took the time and came. This is an extraordinary partnership between the fire agencies especially Santa Barbara County Fire Department and a non-profit, the Firesafe Council. And you can see that in a few years they went from a few hundred thousand dollar budget to ten million. I've never seen a nonprofit organization do that without flaming out, but under Anne Marie's leadership and there is so much administrative overhead to doing all this especially with grants.
And so I think it has really been an extraordinary effort and I can't tell you how important I think it is. It is so important that I elbowed my way onto the board because I believe shared public safety and the communities have to be involved When we start getting more fires, not just what we're seeing today with the Lake Fire but other fires, resources are going to be thin. And the areas that are going to be saved are where communities have done the work ahead of time. They've done their defensible space, their community defensible space, their home hardening And most importantly, the communities are connected. People know each other. There have been a lot of studies about the social connections is one of the biggest aspects of resilience and that's why the program for Firewise Communities is so important.
We have so many neighborhoods where people don't talk to each other, don't even know their next door neighbor. And that makes you vulnerable in an emergency. And so that's what the Fire Safe Council is working on with fire wise communities. I also want to just education is really key we've got a dynamite website. And we do wonderful events and we also have speakers every month and record that.
So they're doing research now on what are natives that are fire resistant and I mean this is laboratory research. And then we're hoping to take it to landscapers so that we can spread that around. To Doss's question, one of the things that's really important to me and I'm sure to you as well Supervisor Williams is that we do this in an environmentally responsible way. I mean, we've suppressed fire for so long now we understand it's a natural part of the cycle and we have to learn to live with fire but we don't want to just clear everything and so how do we design landscapes that are more fire resilient? And that's what this regional wildfire mitigation plan Thank you very much.
Thank you. Thank you very much. Anyway, well done. I think it's really significant work and today we really see how important it is and it's only going to get more important as climate change has greater impact so thank you.
Supervisor Caput?
Thank you for both of these reports. My question is on how we can support you engaging more people. I've been impressed with the event at City College, 275 people and I wrote down your number that you're working with 3,761 but how can we expand on that and engage more people in such important work? What sort of tools do you need? How could we help you with outreach etc.? ?
3:00 – 3:055 turns
Supervisor Hartman is on our board, worked with her the most closely. I think it would be fantastic to meet with all of you individually and talk about how we can work on that, learn about—we want to expand our Fireways communities recognizing HOAs are a really great way to do that so I think you guys tend to have a lot of contacts in the communities and your staff too. It would be great to learn more about that. and work on talking about our focus groups, and how maybe we can start doing that with some of your constituents too to learn about the barriers that they're facing or resources they think they need so that we can all work together on providing what's the community thinks that they need to be more fire safe instead of us going and thinking here's what here's what we think you need.
So letting them speak first but fantastic meet with all of you and talk more about your districts in your regions.
Excellent well we'll follow up with you on that because certainly during the housing element process but we heard from a lot of H.O.A.' 's and groups of neighbors' evacuations and how you plan for these things was top of the list in a very compelling way so I would love to follow up with you on that and engage the Council.
Supervisor Nielsen?
Yes, I wanted to know from Fred if we could go to slide 18 on Tepeskaya, the project summary there on the VMP. And I was just curious on the timeline there. The project ended, I guess in May of this year. I know we had about $6 million that's been out there. Is all the work on Tepscay Canyon complete as far as that program is
concerned? We secured that grant three years ago. It sunsets March of 2025, so most of our efforts as far as some mechanical mostly done by the fuels crew though and we did have a prescribed herbivory project on that in the first year. Most of the, most have at least had initial and maintenance treatments. The significant portion of that project is the prescribed fire project.
We just submitted a completed what's called a vegetation management VMP packet to Cal Fire for their approval. Once that's approved, we can start working to prep a lot of those areas and some of the difficulty it takes about a year to get a VMP packet prepared with all the environmental interest, the surveys and then we also have to get landowner agreements. We're gonna put fire on your parcel so we do have That we're pushing forward so that we can go, it's really technical burning. A lot of topography, a lot of terrain, a lot of brush, a lotta resources at risk, vineyards down at the lower levels. So there are some prescribed fires that you can, it's like three or 4,000 acres of flat grass and you can do that in a couple hours but this one will probably take, if we were to implement all 3,000 acres could take a couple of weeks just to make sure it's done right So we're looking at least starting and doing most of that project and using most of that grant by the end of the year.
Because we won't be putting any fire on the ground in the spring, but there could be some maintenance if there's some funds left over for that. And if I could make just one more point, Most of your offices and my office, and most fire marshals' offices get inundated with questions about insurance. And I think as a collaborative effort with all the fuel reduction, with the education and the efforts the Fire Safe Council is doing in all the local areas, you know, I think it's gonna bear out where we have some improved insurance rates in the county if we can educate the insurance companies too, right? So the Firewise communities, Those communities identified are eligible for a discount on homeowner's insurance.
I've been able to use, during the Spaulding Midland VMP, the Midland School was very happy to report That project was completed to their insurance company. That insurance company wanted that project done. We can get more data as far as if that assisted them with their rate, but you know with this fire now in their backyard it makes a Midland school much more survivable and defendable for the Fire Department. So I've used a lot of the data, and once you get a fire, a pretty big fire in the landscape it's usually not ready to burn for from 17 to 20 years. And our fire return interval just as far as timing has generally been 50 to 60 years. So I think our efforts for the community really help with the pocketbook If we can get everyone educated and continue with our efforts.
3:05 – 3:1415 turns
A big portion of that Tepescay plan is still to be done between
now and March next year? Yeah. And it's probably the fastest moving piece just because it's prescribed fire, but it's also the largest piece so 3,000 acres we're targeting with weather that is favorable and with crews available And we have partners with CAL FIRE. They're also willing to throw their crews in there as well, and the Forest Service to help us implement that project. Sorry for cutting you off on
that. It's good to hear that it's still going to move forward by the end of the grant because I was a little concerned towards the end of it whether we were going to be able to fully execute the plan out there. Sure. I know there are a lot of anxious property owners out there in Tepsake Canyon Are always concerned about fire. It's definitely an area that
would with the sick. Yeah, sure. And with just to reassure you a little bit more With the success of our efforts in Santa Barbara County, a lot of the other counties were able to get a lot more dollars just without trying. At this point, CAL FIRE trusts this county and I started my career as a firefighter in Austin climbing stairs up at dormitories and libraries not knowing much about vegetation management We've built this vegetation management section, and Anne Marie has built her organization up as well.
So we have the trust of CAL FIRE, and we have about 20,000 acres of prescribed fire projects on the books that that we are gonna continue to ask, and it looks like probably as long as the structural budget issues in the state don't fall off a cliff. But I think we will be able to get additional funding either through grant process or not-grant process because we want to be a significant part of that 100,000 acres a year prescribed fire project. So we will likely get a lot of that done in Tepeskay. But if not, we're going to be successful getting some other monies to get it accomplished.
The Fire Safe Council, where are you guys looking at? Do you guys need more engagement in certain areas in the North County?
Yeah, we luckily got a grant to do a CFPP in Lompoc and so Supervisor Hartman has helped lay the groundwork for that by connecting us with some local groups we can work with on partnering to connect with communities. But we did meet with a representative from Kiyama and through some of our grants we're looking to do more work up there Her name is Martha with the resource center up there, Kilmine Valley Resource Center I believe.
We used to have a board member that lived up there. She had some health issues and so had to step down but looking to do a CWPP in that area after Lompoc Valley. So CWPPs have been a great way to start getting engaged with communities, get our foot in the door. And through our focus groups it would be great yourself and Supervisor, I'm horrible with last names and I can't see right now but the chair.
Lavanino. Thank you. I was about to say and I think I was going to say it wrong because I panicked. Meet with you guys to learn about what resources are up there in terms of community engagements organizations and try to work on hosting some focus groups up there to get ourselves more known in the community to be able to provide those services recognizing Your districts are maybe not as the fire risk areas but doesn't mean your residents and constituents don't face negative wildfire impacts especially through smoke, through the 101 being closed they can't get to work in South County that is a significant burden losing a day's work. And so wanting to better understand those issues that students face and how we can potentially help out with that or maybe provide resources to other organizations that can provide those connections and assistance.
Thank you. We appreciate it.
And I believe we have speakers from the public. Oh, yes. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Chair Labadino, members of the board, we do have one request to speak. We will go to Zoom with Benjamin Pittle. Benjamin?
Yeah, good afternoon. Good afternoon Supervisors. I'm Benjamin Piterle, I'm here representing Los Padres Forest Watch. We're a Santa Barbara County based non-profit that works to protect wildlife water wilderness and sustainable access within the Los Padres National Forest and I want to offer mainly words of support today and of course we appreciate everything that County Fire is doing today during the Lake fire to protect the community. We strongly support everything that the Fire Safe Council and County Fire are doing to address community protection using what are sometimes called the home outward approaches, the things like home hardening and defensible space within 100 feet of structures because These practices are tested and proven techniques that really do protect homes even during severe wildfire.
These are solutions that are really making a difference, and we would ask the county to please do everything you can moving forward to support these home-houred programs and initiatives More broadly speaking, we do observe that many federal and state funding programs and mandates seem to be much more focused on the other part of the equation, the fuels management.
However what we see in terms of effectiveness unfortunately it tends to be very different especially during severe wind driven wildfire events which of course are the types of wildfires we tend to be most concerned with and we're just seeing this play out time and time again And again, I'm speaking very broadly here but defensible space near homes and evacuation routes on areas that protect firefighters. These things are very important but the notion or the idea that many people have that fuel reduction in more remote And I think it's important to note that when we talk about natural areas, that that effectively stops the spread of severe wind-driven wildfires in our mountains and forests. That's just not playing out nationwide the way that many people expect.
And that's important because that's also where the more significant environmental tradeoffs can occur. So we always want to offer the polite reminder Fuel in many cases, it's actually native wildlife habitat. It's important and when we start making statements about making forest healthier with fuel reduction that's where things can get complicated and controversial quickly. Some forms of fuel treatment can be very impactful but we're very grateful that Santa Barbara County Fire generally speaking has worked to insert some sensibility into this issue and it has offered its influence as a regional partner in an effort to strike an appropriate balance. And you know we don't always agree with every project, and of course um we'd love to see things always continue to improve in terms of being extra selective and careful with fuel projects but we do appreciate County Fire's ongoing attention generally to making sure we're being as strategic as possible with fuel work as we move further and further from homes and community centers And again, fantastic work from the Fire Safe Council.
So with all that said thanks very much we appreciate your work. All right thank you very much
Supervisor Hartman
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just one final thing I wanted to emphasize that the Fire Safe Council and my office is hosting on Friday August 23rd at 1 p.m., research results from focus groups that we did in disadvantaged communities about their questions and issues about fire and evacuation. And it was kind of surprising so this is for Cities and planners across the county, but just wanted to give that a shout out.
Outstanding. All right, so is this receiving file A and B? Be interested in a motion?
So I move A and B of staff recommendation.
Okay second. Moved and seconded all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Thank you very much. All right, we're now gonna be recessing to closed session. Well County Council could you please read the items for consideration today?
3:14 – 3:165 turns
Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the board. The board is scheduled to meet in closed session for a conference with labor negotiators. The employee organizations are all bargaining units, unrepresented employees, managers and executives. And the agency designated representatives are CEO Miyasato and Human Resources Director Christine Schmidt. Two items of existing litigation, Pacific Pipeline Company versus Santa Barbara County Planning Commission.
That's a central district court case and American Medical Response West versus the county and that's a Santa Barbara Superior Court case. And one public employee performance evaluation for a county executive officer. And the time estimate is two hours.
Two hours you said? Okay we'll be back approximately 2.30.
Okay, we are back from closed session. County Council, can you please read out closed session?
The board met in closed session on conference with labor negotiators for all bargaining units, existing litigation Pacific Pipeline versus Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and American Medical Response West which is the county and public employee performance evaluation for a county executive officer and the board took no reportable action.
Thank you with that we are adjourned until Tuesday July 16th in Santa Maria.