UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:00 – 0:066 turns
It's been the same for 15 years. And no one has figured it out, so it's got to be a good one. All right. Good morning everybody. I'd like to call this meeting to order September 10th 2024. Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Madam Clerk, can we get a roll call please?
Roll call, called by Jacquelyne Alexander
Show transcript
Next item of business is the approval of the minutes from the August 27, 2024 regular meeting. Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Any abstentions? Passes unanimously. Our
next item of business is the County Executive Officers Report.
Thank you, good morning Turtle Avenue and board members. I have three quick announcements in the presentation of an award this morning. First of all this morning the county celebrated the groundbreaking of a new probation department building on Garden Street. This new zero net energy building will consolidate all South County probation related services in one central location to foster more efficient and cohesive approach to probation services. It is anticipated to be completed in fall 2026. Thank you to the Probation Department General Services The second announcement is that the U.S. Small Business Administration is now offering low-interest federal disaster loans for working capital to small businesses economically impacted by the Lake Fire that occurred from July 5th to August 4th.
Additional information can be found on our ReadySBC.org website Third, the County of Santa Barbara will receive a nearly $2 million award from the U.S. Department of Labor's National Farmworker Jobs Program. The grant will go to the county's farm worker resource center that helps provide training and career services to help migrant and seasonal farm workers and their dependents develop skills to pursue careers in agriculture or non-agricultural sectors.
Good job to Lewis Servant and his team in DSS for making this huge grant happen. And lastly, one of our employees is receiving a special honor today. The California Product Stewardship Council has named Caitlin Haberlin from the Public Works Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division Associate of the Year. Caitlin is a program specialist for the county who oversees various waste reduction and waste management programs including Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Electronics Recycling, and Edible Food Recovery. She also manages the county's Less Is More website. Why don't you come up, Caitlin?
The California Product Stewardship Council gives this award out annually to a member who actively nurtures and sustains the extender producer responsibility strategy to place a shared responsibility for end-of-life product management. We're honored to have CPSC's Executive Director, Doug Kobold here with us today to present Caitlin with her award.
Good morning, Mr. Chair and members of the board. It's my pleasure to be here to talk a little bit about Caitlin and why she received our most prestigious award for our multiple funders that we have. But in case you're not familiar with the California Product Stewardship Council, we affectionately call ourselves CPSC. We are a 501c3 non-profit organization. We are funded by over 120 cities, counties, JPAs and districts as well as with private sector sponsors to advocate for the end of life of products and who should be paying for those? Should it be the rate payers or should it be the cities and counties which who pass that on to the ratepayers or should it really be borne on the manufacturers who make the products that we buy every day. If the manufacturers don't feel the burden of the cost at the end-of-life, then they don't change their design.
They don't care. They just want to make it cheaper, quicker and make more of them and that is a huge waste for everybody so we advocate for more durable, more reusable, more recyclable or repairable and then more recyclable products. So that is a little bit about CPSC. I do also want to thank this board Thank you. Associates, so we have associates and sponsors are private sector folks that show outstanding leadership in their field.
Innovative solutions to long-standing issues and effective partnerships in regarding the product stewardship green design. Caitlin got this award because one thing, she was very instrumental in our textiles recycling project we did here in the county with the RMDZ. There is a report online if you're interested in seeing it that staff I'm sure would be happy to forward it to you that talked about The county's involvement in that project, trying to show that textile recycling can be done. We actually have a bill in the legislature on the governor's desk right now, SB 707, to require that statewide. An actual recycling program that will actually make use of the products and make them better Make them so that it can be put back in commerce. If they're missing a button, they could be repaired.
If they've got a stain, they could be washed. So they don't leave the shore and go off to third world countries where they end up being disposed of improperly. I also want to state that Caitlin is continuing to nurture and sustain our EPR movement. And she is doing that through policies to better the community of Santa Barbara County. And with that, I'm going to turn it over to her.
Thank you so much to Doug and the CPSC team. We are very grateful to have everyone come join us in Santa Barbara for our textile event, and we're super excited to hear that SB 707 is at the Governor's desk for signature to help textile reuse repair and recycling in Santa Barbara County. And just overall for your generous time and efforts in all your programs to make sure It gets all of our products are diverted from the landfill and safely recycled and handled. And yeah, thanks so much for the resource recovery and recycling team and just everyone at the county for the support of these programs.
0:06 – 0:118 turns
That concludes my report chair.
All right, thank you. Mr. Chair? Yes. You know often I tell you some folks that come here that do lobbying, well yeah I guess the legislature listens to them. I'll tell you the Stewardship Council really makes a difference at the legislature. They sponsor legislation, they've successfully brought it to the finish line and they're a great partner to have Especially when I remember while I was in there on batteries. Very cheap, short-lived batteries coming over in toys from the People's Republic of China and clogging up our landfills with toxic waste. So, you know they have been very active and I also just want to appreciate the department for handling textiles. Textiles is a real tough one because it doesn't create as much weight but it's still a very important one to handle so talk about an avenue where you don't get as much state credit because it's not weight who doesn't have weight but it's still really important to handle for the community.
So I want to thank both of the Department and the Stewardship Council
Okay, great. Thank you very much. That closes out our CEO's report. Madam Clerk, are there any announcements or changes to our agenda today?
Chair Lavanino and members of the board yes I have a few announcements this morning we posted an addendum to today's agenda on Friday September 6th adding administrative item number 42 to the agenda. Administrative item number 42 is from the Information Technology Department it is to consider recommendations regarding a second amendment to the agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Pictometry International Corps for digital aerial data acquisition projects. This addendum has been posted online and made available to the board and the public, and can be added to the balance of the administrative agenda.
Additionally, I have a brief announcement on Administrative Item Number 26. Administrative item number 26 is from the Human Resources Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding a performance-based salary adjustment for the county executive officer Prior to the board acting on administrative item number 26 in accordance with government code section 54953 subdivision C3, County Executive Officer Mona Miyasato's salary information shall be summarized verbally.
County Human Resources recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a performance-based annual salary increase of 2.5 percent Effective September 16th, 2024 based on the CEO's performance in the past year. Additionally we received a request from the department to continue departmental item number two. Departmental item number two is from the county executive office it is to consider recommendations regarding a rural county representatives of California RCRC member agency strategic plan update The department is requesting a continuance from today's meeting to the Tuesday, October 1st 2024 meeting in Santa Barbara. This continuance request memo has been made available to the board and the public. In addition with we have no requests to speak on this item from the public so if the board would like to act on this continuous request following the clerk's announcements they may do so.
Lastly for the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general Lastly for the Board of Supervisors methods of public participation and to provide public comment on general public comment or an item on the board's agenda please see page 2 of the agenda. Individuals that would like to provide verbal public comment may do so via zoom by registering in advance via the link available on page two if you have any questions please contact the clerk at the board's office at area code 805-568-2240 Again, that's 805-568-2240. And that concludes my announcements for today.
All right. Great. That takes us to our
next item of business which is the administrative agenda. Would any board members like to pull any items? So far I have 12, 16, 20 and 37. Any other board members like to pull any items? Do we have any other requests from the public then? Chair Lavagnino
and members of the board, we have requests to speak on A37. 37
got it okay I will now entertain a motion to approve the balance of the administrative agenda except for items 12 16 20 and 37
0:11 – 0:1511 turns
so moved
and
also
the
continuation of item D2
great thanks good catch
second
moved and seconded all those in favor aye any opposed abstentions Passes unanimously. Okay, the next item we'll come back to those items in just a minute. We're going to take care of our resolutions first and then we'll come back to those administrative agenda items so Madam Clerk can you please read item number one into the record?
Chair Lavinino and members of the board. Administrative item number one is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino, it is to adopt a resolution of commendation honoring Cody Leeds of the Agricultural Commissioners Department as the September 2024 Employee of the Month in Santa Barbara County and joining us in person today we have Cody Leeds and Lottie Martin and if you can please come to the podium And I'll go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas Cody leads exemplifies the county's organizational values of accountability, customer focus equity and inclusion innovation trust and ethics. And whereas Cody leads models the transformative behaviors of collaborative problem solving alignment with the county's vision risk taking data driven decision making and strategic thinking.
And whereas Cody leads contributes his opinions and ideas openly and honestly his unique enthusiasm always encourages communication and he Treats everyone with courtesy and respect. And whereas Cody Leeds understands all aspects of providing education and outreach to businesses, The board of supervisors recognizes Cody leads as the employee of the month for September 2024.
Good morning Chair Lavinino and members of the board. I'm Lottie Martin, Assistant Agricultural Commissioner representing the Agricultural Commissioners Office Weights & Measures Department and on behalf of our commissioner Jose Chang and our whole team we are honored to recognize Cody Leeds as the Santa Barbara County Employee of the Month. Cody is a humble public servant who strives to serve our community in a collaborative and inclusive manner He has consistently demonstrated exceptional dedication, professionalism and commitment to excellence in his role with the department's Consumer Protection Division.
His innovative approach to problem solving and unwavering support for his colleagues has significantly contributed to our team success. Whether it's going above and beyond to assist a community member or leading a critical project to completion, Cody embodies the true spirit of public service. We are incredibly grateful for his hard work and proud to have him as part of our team. Congratulations, Cody on this well-deserved recognition.
Thank you very much chair and members of the board. It's an honor to receive this recognition, and it's an honor to work with the Agriculture Commissioner's Office every day protecting agriculture, the environment, and the community. I work with an excellent bunch of people, and I couldn't do what I do without them so I thank them as well, and thank you very much for the recognition.
0:15 – 0:216 turns
Madam Clerk item two
Chair Lavagnino, members of the Board, Administrative Item Number 2 is sponsored by Supervisor Caps and Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the week of September 23rd 2024 through September 29th 2024 as Diaper Need Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County. And joining us in person today we have Lori Lander Goodman, Kara Shoemaker and Darcy Brakeman.
If you can please come to the podium. I'll go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas diaper need, the inability to afford enough clean diapers can adversely affect the health and well-being of children in their families. And whereas national surveys indicate nearly one in two families struggles with diaper need and 48% of families delay changing diapers to extend their supply.
And whereas a sufficient supply of diapers is often required for babies and toddlers to participate in child care and early education programs, enabling children to thrive and parents to work. And whereas without enough diapers, babies and toddlers risk infections that may require medical attention leading to medical costs and parents may be unable to access childcare needed to work or attend school.
Destabilizing the family's economic well-being. And whereas diaper need is a public health issue and addressing it can lead to economic opportunities and improved health for children, ensuring all families have the basic necessities that thrive. And whereas Santa Barbara County is proud to be home to community based organizations like LEAP, Learn Engage Advocate Advocate, partner which distribute diapers to families promoting health and economic stability. And whereas LEAP established the only registered diaper bank in Santa Barbara County which plays a critical role in supporting families improving infant health and advancing local and state economic growth.
Now therefore, be it hereby ordered and resolved that September 26th through 29th is recognized as Diaper Need Awareness Week in Santa Barbara County. And thank LEAP, their staff, volunteers and donors for their service and encourages citizens to support organizations that distribute diapers to families in need so that all children and families in Santa Barbara County can thrive past and adopted today.
Supervisors, thank you so much for recognizing the tremendous need for diapers not just in our county but across the country. Santa Barbara County is the only county in California that is taking this step, so congratulations. Somehow the diaper banks and the other counties haven't gotten their acts together. As a leader, I'm committed to leading with an abundance mindset.
It is my strong belief that if we want to interrupt the cycle of poverty, we need to shift from perspective of scarcity to one of abundance. Our students and families at LEAP may struggle at home but when they come to LEAP they should be welcomed with joy, with excellence and with bounty. Sadly, it's typical for nonprofits to operate with a scarcity mentality.
It takes courage to make a shift especially when funding is insecure but as we've intentionally embraced abundance the results have been nothing short of remarkable One of our bravest initiatives has been our diaper bank, which we started in 2021. This might seem like a simple service but its impact has been profound. We've provided almost 200,000 diapers to families in need.
Let that sink in for a moment. That's 200,000 times a parent didn't have to choose between buying diapers or putting food on the table. The results have been impressive. Families report reduced stress, improved financial stability and better health outcomes for their babies. And this ripple effect is exactly what an abundance mindset can create. By providing diapers, we're not just meeting an immediate need. We're creating long-term impact. Parents can afford to send their children to childcare which allows them to work or attend school. It opens up opportunities for advancement and breaks the cycle of poverty.
But most importantly our diaper bank serves as a gateway to our other services Families who come in for diapers are invited to learn about positive parenting, financial literacy, tenants' rights. And when we build trust with families by providing diapers, we begin to hear about their goals and the obstacles they face and we can provide the additional support they need.
One interaction leads to another, a virtuous cycle. This is what leading with abundance looks like. It's not about having unlimited resources, it's about seeing the potential in what we have and making strategic decisions that create long-term value. It's about hope and possibility and joy. Together we can create a future where every child, every family and our whole community has the opportunity to flourish.
A future built not on scarcity and fear but on abundance and possibility. Thank you so much for your support in your partnership and for allowing me to speak to you today.
Thank You Supervisor Caps
Thank you. Lori Goodman always puts things in such beautiful context that this is so much more than just providing diapers, which cost about $100 a month. Just to remind everybody we have one of the highest poverty rates in the state and that poverty impacts women and women with children most acutely So this is a real service that you're providing and it was our honor to support that in our way today with the county resolution. But really your team are doing the yeoman's work of building that trust, providing such an essential need for women and their babies to grow up and thrive and know that this community really cares for them so thank you. Thank
you. I just want to thank Lori for her leadership for many years. It really makes a difference and I'm so looking forward when it comes to Lompoc. Me too.
0:21 – 0:253 turns
Madam Clerk, Item 3.
Chair Lavagnino and members of the Board, Administrative Item Number Three is sponsored by Supervisor Capps and Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution honoring Los Padres Forest Watch upon 20 years of protecting the Los Padres National Forest in Santa Barbara County. And joining us in person today we have Jeff Kuyper And if you can please come to the podium and I'll go ahead and read the resolution.
Central Coast significantly impacting Santa Barbara County by providing clean water, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitats while enhancing the local economy. Los Padres Forest Watch is the sole nonprofit dedicated to protecting these vital resources in the Los Padres National Forests and Carrizo Plain National Monument for current and future generations.
And whereas over the past two decades, Forest Watch has mobilized more than 1,000 volunteers who have contributed over 10,000 hours of service protecting wildlife habitat, cleaning up trash and restoring degraded areas while securing increased protections for over a million acres of national forest land. And whereas hundreds of underserved youth and families have been introduced to the wonders of nature through Forest Watch's Outdoor Connections Program, which creates lassy memories and inspires the next generation of land stewards amongst communities most in need. And whereas the county's iconic wildlife mountain lions, bears, deer, bobcats, coyotes and more can move about the region more safely due to Forest Watch Room-to-Roam program, which has worked to protect critical travel ways to ensure a safe future for our region's wildlife.
And whereas this important work would not be possible without the support of thousands of generous members, committed advocates and dedicated volunteers who understand the importance of protecting the great outdoors in our own backyard. En Los Padres Forest Watch was incorporated as a non-profit public benefit corporation in California formerly recognized as a 501c3 charitable organization in 2004 Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors hereby honors Los Padres Forest Watch for its 20 years of dedicated service in protecting land, wildlife and water conservation throughout the Los Padres National Forest passed and adopted today.
Thank you so much. Good morning Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I'm thrilled and honored to be here this morning to accept this resolution recognizing our 20th anniversary. Los Padres National Forest is one of the crown jewels of Santa Barbara County and here's why it provides a source of clean water for our farms and communities, provides diverse and unique wildlife habitat Provides places to get outside, to get away from it all. To recharge, to discover and explore and to make memories with our friends and families and neighbors.
And it supports our local economy while helping to regulate our climate. These lands are worth protecting. Let me say that again, these lands are worth protecting. And for the last two decades we have worked day after day to do just that. But we can't do it alone. So today, I want to thank you for all that you do to protect this spectacular forest and other public lands right here in our own backyard throughout the county.
These wild places inspire us. They sustain us and they need our help now more than ever. So we look forward to working together over the next two decades and beyond to make that happen. Let's get to work, there is no time to waste. So on behalf of the board and staff of Los Padres Forest Watch thank you again for celebrating this important milestone with us. Thank you. Thank you.
0:25 – 0:324 turns
Madam Clerk, A4.
Chair Lavinino and members of the Board, Administrative Item number four is sponsored by Supervisor Caps and Supervisor Lavinino. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of September 2024 as Suicide Prevention Month in Santa Barbara County. And joining us in person today we have Tony Navarro, Behavioral Wellness Department Director, and Pamela Flint-Tambo, the chair of the Behavioral Wellness Commission.
And I will go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas this resolution recognizes suicide as a national and statewide public mental health problem, and suicide prevention as a national statewide responsibility. And designates the month of September as National Suicide Prevention Month in Santa Barbara County. This month overlaps World Suicide Prevention Day, September 10th, recognized internationally and supported by the World Health Organization. And whereas suicide is a significant public health issue that affects individuals, families and communities nationwide with more than 47,000 lives lost to suicide in the United States each year With the Center for Disease Control estimating a total of 49,476 deaths by suicide in the United States in 2022.
And whereas in California, suicide is the second leading cause of death among individuals age 15 to 34 and more than 4,000 Californians die by suicide annually. And whereas it is estimated that there were 1.6 million adult suicide attempts nationally in 2022, and in 2021 California experienced 4148 suicide attempts. And whereas over 90% of the people who die by suicide have a diagnosable and treatable mental health condition although often that condition is not recognized or treated. And whereas Santa Barbara County lost 45 community members to death by suicide in 2023.
And whereas it is essential for everyone in our community to recognize the warning signs of suicide and encourage those who struggle to seek help and know how to offer support and to be aware of the resources available, including hotlines, counseling services, and other mental health programs. And whereas if someone can get through the intense and short moment of active suicidal crisis, chances are they will not die by suicide. And whereas during Suicide Prevention Month we call upon in the community to learn more about suicide prevention, to reach out to those in need, and to work together to build a safer, more supportive community.
And whereas the Department of Behavioral Wellness and Organizations such as the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, envision a world without suicide and are dedicated to saving lives and bringing hope to those affected by suicide through research education advocacy and resources for those who struggle and for the family friends and community of those who have lost.
It is hereby ordered and resolved that the Board of Supervisors recognizes the month of September as Suicide Prevention Month in Santa Barbara County, and recognizes suicide as a preventable national and state public health problem and declares suicide prevention to be a priority and commit to actively participating in awareness campaigns events and initiatives throughout September 2024. We express our deepest sympathy to those who have lost loved ones to death by suicide and honor their memories by taking meaningful actions to prevent future tragedies Commit to creating stigma-free environments that foster open conversations about mental health and encourage individuals to seek help without fear or judgment or discrimination.
Acknowledge that suicide prevention is a collective responsibility, and we will work together to build support, connect in empathetic communities where every life is valued and cherished. Encourage initiatives based on the goals contained in the national strategy Strategy for Suicide Prevention in California Strategic Plan on Suicide Prevention. Develop and implement strategies to increase access to quality mental health, substance use and suicide prevention services passed and adopted today.
Thank you. Good morning, Chair Lavagnino, Supervisors, County staff. We are proud to be here to accept this resolution and proclaim September as Suicide Prevention Month. We're joined today by the chair of our Be Well Commission Pam Tambo-Flint And Suzanne Grimacy, our public information officer. Suzanne has been instrumental in launching the first public awareness anti-suicide campaign for our county via BeWells in fall of 2023, the first time in a decade that we've had such a campaign. It's the Stay Campaign and hopefully some of you have seen our Thank you all for joining us. We have a lot of ads on the sides of buses and all around town.
Suzanne is also the co-chair of the out of the darkness walk happening on Saturday, September 28th at Goleta Beach. You can join us at 9 AM and we walk starting at 10 o'clock to honor our loved ones
Thank you for this resolution today. I've not really paid much attention to September being the month to remember suicides because I've had my own personal memory of a suicide by my brother in the month of September. My brother had a serious mental health issue, and he seriously injured himself with a hatchet and required emergency room services. And then he was taken to the county jail.
Several days later, he was released to a mental health ward. But he found an attorney to help him get out and then within a month, he died by suicide with a firearm. This happened in 1974, 50 years ago this week, he died. And I believe we're still arresting and jailing people who have serious mental illnesses instead of assuring that they get appropriate treatment for mental and behavioral health issues.
We need to stop jailing people for being ill, and I am very hopeful that in Santa Barbara County we can begin to do that. Thank you.
0:32 – 0:344 turns
Chair Lovanino, members of the board thank you so much for recognizing this month. Suicide is not just a national crisis costing 46,000 lives annually as you just heard it's personal and as you also just heard to many in Santa Barbara County and its impact is felt deeply In our county, deaths by suicide have affected all ages. And although right now our data is trending down which is a great thing we know the importance of staying vigilant to suicide prevention efforts all the time As a department, we're doing all we can to raise suicide awareness, to be present for community members in the aftermath of deaths by suicide. And as Tony shared just a moment ago, we would invite all of you, all of you to join us at Goleta Beach on September 28th.
It's a wonderful powerful event The program goes from about 10 till 1230. Arriving early is encouraged because you can look around and see the resources, walk through the UCSB campus but a very powerful event. Free event you just need to register. All of us can be a part of suicide prevention in our county. We can talk openly about mental health we can break the stigma and we can offer hope to those that are struggling The simple act of checking in with a family member, with a friend, with a neighbor, talking to someone in the grocery store line all make a powerful difference.
This resolution is a reminder to our shared commitment to prevent these losses, to support those in crisis and uplift the families whose lives have forever been changed by suicide. So thank you.
Thank you. Supervisor Caps?
Thank you.
I just wanted to take a moment to thank Pam Flint-Tambo. Pam, I didn't know your story and thank you for the courage of sharing in such a hard challenging week and I see how much you work to help others. It's the quiet work it's serving as chair of Be Well it's working with Clue it's all of the advocacy ways and how you've turned your grief into such powerful and yet quiet action really means a lot. Thank you Pam.
0:34 – 0:395 turns
Thank you. Madam Clerk, A5.
Chair Lavanino and members of the board. Administrative item number five is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of September 2024 as Rotary Month of Service in Santa Barbara County and joining us here in person today we have Judith Canby. And I will go ahead and read the resolution. Whereas Rotary International is a global philanthropic organization which cares very deeply about serving communities across the world where needed, and whereas Rotary International engages in community service charitable work fundraising and organizing programs to support underprivileged populations, and whereas Santa Barbara County is a part of Rotary District 5240 which comprises 68 Rotary Clubs of about 3,000 members in four counties.
Kern County, San Luis Obispo County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County. And whereas Rotary International has officially adopted seven areas of focus promoting peace and conflict resolution, disease prevention, providing clean water, sanitation and hygiene, maternal and childcare health, supporting education and literacy community and economic development and protecting the environment.
And whereas Rotary International plays a vital role in community development by providing resources and services to support local community projects, such as building playgrounds. And whereas Rotary International engages in various charitable works such as donating to food banks, homeless shelters and disaster relief efforts. And whereas Rotary International focuses on developing the skills and talents of young people by providing mentoring leadership training and scholarship programs as well as networking opportunities for members where they can interact with other professionals and community leaders, build relationships and expand their social and professional networks. And whereas Rotary International encourages civic engagement by promoting volunteering and community service now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that September is recognized as Rotary Month of Service in Santa Barbara County a month to engage in significant contributions to the development of our communities passed and adopted today
My name is Judith Canby and I am very happy to be here today. I'm a member of the Los Olivos Rotary Club and have been for more than 20 years. I am also representing our District Governor Sherry Sim as I'm one of the Assistant Governors, and represent Group 9 which includes the Santa Ynez Valley Rotary Clubs and Lompoc Rotary Club. We very much appreciate the fact that you are supporting Rotary's work. We know it's important, we know what we can accomplish when we work together and that's one of the things that Rotary does well.
You'll be happy to know that there are more than 20 rotary clubs, interact clubs and rotaract clubs within Santa Barbara alone. That's quite an accomplishment. You wonder how one city can support four different rotary clubs? It's because people care about what's happening in their community Together with Rotarians throughout California, District 5240 Rotarians will be honoring the proclamation each September. We will be carrying out service projects in Rotary International Seminaries of Focus which you just heard about and we want you to know that this isn't just for Rotary. This is for all the service clubs in California and we invite them to join us every year in September to improve our communities. Again, we appreciate your endorsement.
We will collaborate with other service clubs to join us in our endeavor And we will make sure that we make Santa Barbara a better place to live. Thank you very much.
Well, I just wanted to add it doesn't get much better than Rotary. They talk about people being in their bubbles but Rotary is one place where everybody comes together and works together engaged on behalf of their community and as I look at the goals so many of the goals that Rotary pursues for maternal health and disease prevention environmental protection they dovetail with the county's goals as well I think this is an organization that works locally and also works internationally. So it just, it does it all. And I thank you for being here Judith and all the people who are members.
There's a book that influenced me, Bowling Alone. We're so isolated and that is the reason we're so divided And so if you want to get out of it, join Rotary. That's a great place to start. Thank you.
Great. Madam Clerk, A6 please.
0:39 – 0:445 turns
Chair Lavanino and members of the Board, Administrative Item Number 6 is sponsored by Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Nelson. It is to adopt a resolution proclaiming the month of September 2024 as National Preparedness Month in Santa Barbara County and joining us in person today We have Jackie Ruiz and Kelly Hubbard. And I will go ahead and read the resolution.
Whereas National Preparedness Month provides an opportunity for local community members to join people across the United States in preparing their homes, businesses, and communities for any emergency. And whereas the Federal Emergency Management Agency has designated National Preparedness Month as a yearly opportunity to focus on hazards and disasters our community may be susceptible to and how we can stay ready and resilient.
And whereas planning now is the best way to improve community recovery from disasters, when individuals take responsibility for preparing their families and their communities, the chance of survival and return to normalcy following a disaster is greatly increased. And whereas the County Office of Emergency Management and community partners are tasked with promoting and supporting emergency preparedness, educating individuals on local hazards including wildfires Earthquakes, storms, power outages, extreme weather and more. And whereas the Office of Emergency Management is committed to diversity equity inclusion and accessibility throughout all aspects of emergency response including public education preparedness resources and emergency information.
And whereas Santa Barbara County is home to several community-based preparedness and response teams comprised of volunteers who have selflessly undergone hours of training to help our communities be more resilient. And whereas this month, the County Office of Emergency Management urges all residents to plan for disasters by registering or reviewing and updating their contact information at www.readysbc.org to receive emergency alerts. And whereas while we cannot always know when the next disaster emergency will confront us, we must remain ready together we can ensure that we have the information and resources needed to safeguard our communities from a crisis or disaster. Now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved That the Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim the month of September 2024 as National Preparedness Month in Santa Barbara County and calls on all government agencies, private organizations and the people and businesses of Santa Barbara County to develop their own emergency preparedness plan and work together toward creating a stronger and more resilient community passed and adopted today.
We have a video here that we wanted to share. Jackie from our team has been putting together some preparedness videos. What's the deal
with ReadySBC alerts? Here's what they are. They're emergency alerts for hazards near the addresses you've registered. Hint, hint! You have to register for them. They're delivered as an email text or phone call depending on the contact method you selected They will always have an action for you to take, such as evacuate now or prepare for a possible power outage. Now that we know what ReadySVC alerts are, what are they not?
A play-by-play of every update during an emergency. Just a weather report. Your only source for information. Whether flood, fire or any other emergency, registering for ReadySBC Alerts is a great step to stay prepared. Visit readysbc.org to sign up today or to make sure your information is correct if you've already registered.
So this is just one example. These will be done in English and Spanish, and we'll be posting these throughout the month. One of the concepts in another video that will be coming out is for instance we know people make mistakes when they register and maybe abbreviate their address. This was a big one we just had in the Lake Fire and someone was, people were abbreviating Fig Mountain instead of Figueroa Mountain. And that won't come up in our system And so we're going to be doing some videos to help people go in and be able to correct their contact information if they've already registered, but also update it. Maybe your child started school in a new school this year and you want to register the address that they go to school at or something of that nature.
So we'll be focusing a lot on our alerts but also always – also the other concepts of having a plan, knowing how you're going to evacuate if you need to evacuate Having a kit, whether that's in your car at your office or at home and making sure you're thinking of those may be more vulnerable in your family who might need additional resources. Or yourself, whether you need an extra pair of glasses, your medications in your emergency kit, the diapers for your children that were just presented earlier, whatever those items might be making sure you're thinking through your kits for those special needs that your family might have. So thank you.
Thank you. All right, that takes us to our last resolution of the day which is A7.
0:44 – 0:492 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the Board, Administrative Item Number 7 is sponsored by Supervisor Lavinino. It is to adopt a Resolution of Accommodation honoring C International for 50 years of service to the community of Santa Barbara County and joining us in person today we have Rachel Tennant, the C International Chief Development Officer. If you can please make your way to the podium I'll go ahead and read the resolution.
Whereas on October 24, 2024, SEE International will celebrate its 50th anniversary. And whereas since the organization's founding in 1974 by local Santa Barbara ophthalmologist Dr. Harry Brown along with many other visionaries, SEE has reached great heights in its mission to end preventable blindness and whereas SEE provides access to sight restoring surgeries and essential eye care to people who do not have access to these services And whereas partners include volunteer doctors, medical professionals, U.S. and international organizations and generous donors. And whereas since inception over 5 million people worldwide including over 750,000 surgeries in 54 countries have been served and whereas local and domestic programs serve the central coast of California with the local C Vision Clinic program and in various states in our nation.
C provides screenings, comprehensive eye exams, prescriptive glasses and surgical referral services. And whereas C is a partner and provides vital services at the Santa Barbara County Veterans Stand Down, an annual event to assist homeless and at-risk military veterans get back on their feet. And now therefore be it hereby ordered and resolved that this Board of Supervisors acknowledges C International as a unique organization with a very important purpose And function in Santa Barbara County and worldwide. And honors SEA International upon its 50th anniversary, and commends the organization for its continued dedication to preserving, protecting, and enhancing the quality of life for the citizens of Santa Barbara County passed and adopted today.
Thank you so much. I want to start by expressing our gratitude to the County of Santa Barbara and the Board of Supervisors for this wonderful acknowledgement. It is truly an honor to be here. So, as said Sea International was founded in 1974 by local ophthalmologist Dr. Harry Brown and many other dedicated ophthalmologists. Our mission is simple yet profound – to eliminate preventable and treatable blindness.
So what does that mean? The most common causes for treatable and preventable visual impairment are cataracts and refractive errors. These are conditions that have severe impacts, causing children to fall behind in school or not attend at all, parents to leave the workforce and not be able to support their families, and the elderly to lose their independence.
I personally have witnessed these this past September when I went to Guatemala, and I regularly see this from our local clinic here right in Santa Barbara. We host events like Children's Sight Month which happened just last month where we go to see children in our local organizations to make sure that they are prepared for school and they will succeed with no prevention from their visual health.
As a daughter, a granddaughter and a parent now I am overwhelmed by the impact visual health creates and how it can often be taken for granted. We collaborate with volunteer medical professionals and organizations to provide more than 40 countries support, including right here in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. To date we've reached over five million people and have served 750,000 with site restoring surgeries.
And this number continues to grow. In honour of 50 years of transformative work and to celebrate the contributions that so many have given, we are hosting a special event Thursday October 24th It will be held at the Hilton Santa Barbara Beachfront Resort starting at 530 p.m., and we'll hope that the community will join us in the celebration and achievements, and see what the future holds.
Thank you so much again. I appreciate this.
0:49 – 0:5524 turns
Okay, we will now take up the administrative items pulled in numerical order. And my list I believe starts with A-12. Madam Clerk?
Chair Lavagnino and members of the Board, Administrative Item Number 12 is from the Clerk Recorder Assessor Elections Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding a second amendment to the agreement with Dominion Voting Systems Inc., and we do have one request from the public on this item.
Mr. Daly, let's go to the public first and then we'll come back to you so...
We will go to Karen Howenstein. Karen?
Hello, Supervisors. I just want to reiterate my lack of confidence in Dominion voting systems that Dominion voting systems and their controversy and the things that they've entered into our brains about voting and how voting is controlled electronically and how it's hacked and things like that have given the voters and the constituents of this county No confidence at all in their name as a brand.
And I see that you guys are going to be spending millions and millions of dollars on licensing agreements and other and sundry agreements that you have with this corporation, and you're still treating them like they're legitimate. And the constituents of this county want to know exactly how Dominion Voting Systems is complying with the law in transparency in our county.
We want to know that And you guys are going to have to show us. Everything is being recorded, thank you.
Thank you.
And that concludes public comment on this item.
Okay, that takes us
to...
Supervisor.
Oh I'm sorry. Chair Lavinia, I had a couple of questions for Mr. Daly if that's okay? Got
it, Supervisor Nelson.
Yes thank you. A few questions for Mr. Daly who I believe is here from the elections office. Looking at the board letter It's for a budget, expand the contract by 1.1 million yet looks like we're only looking to spend less than half of that. Can you please help me understand? And then our board, sorry and then the budget journal entry is only for a quarter of that so I'm just trying to understand exactly why we need a $1.1 million budget expansion if it's for just a half a million We're really only doing a budget entry for a quarter million. There's a bunch of numbers flying around here and I don't think it necessarily adds up.
Mr. Nelson, through the chair, I'm going to have our fiscal manager Vanessa Grave answer that question for you.
Good morning, Supervisor Nelson through the Chair. So we did already budget of the purchase of the scanner in our current budget so the budget adjustment is just for the purchase of the printers and the additional hardware and this scanner was a little more so that's why the budget adjustment is smaller than not to exceed amount does include any special elections or recalls that could happen so we do increase the not-to-exceed is more because we don't want to come back to you if we do have a recall again or a special election that we did not plan for.
All right I think the past board letters we had, we also had those not succeed numbers but then when it passed those and even you know we did at the recall for governor but it seems that we've gone past these numbers even
without now that we're buying additional equipment we're gonna have the additional software costs every year so those are compounding on top of our initial software so the end not to exceed is going up for those. And then I mean all election costs are going up, so we wanted to raise our ceiling for any other purchases that we may need.
And that's actually one of my next, goes to my next question about RFPs and requests for proposals. You know Dominion is one of many software companies that do this in the state of California. There have been some questions around Dominion's level of service and quality. Where is the Elections Department on additional proposals for other compliant software in the future?
I'm gonna have Michael Daly answer that one. Thank you.
Mr. Nelson through the chair, you know contrary to some of the comments that were even just made Dominion is a very reputable company they're actually only one of two companies that is certified to do this work in the state of California there are very stringent laws and certifications and logic and accuracy tests that they have to go through to have their equipment certified and usable on an election so the options are not They're not RFP scale.
There's limited marketplace for this. We're also just as a note, an added note and people should understand this we're required by law to use voting equipment it's now stated in the California Elections Code that we shall use this so Getting out of this to go back to something different is kind of an absurd notion at this point.
Yeah, that wasn't my question so thank you. My question was about an RFP and we often do RFPs when there's only a couple vendors out there just curious if there are no plans in the future. When I look back at 2019 when we moved to Dominion it didn't seem like we went through So is there any formal procurement that we might be looking at in the future? At this point in time, no. Okay thank you.
So Chair Lavinia when we get to this I'd like a roll call vote on that one.
Okay and well why don't we just do it now since we have a separate vote on that one. Anyone?
I'll move staff recommendation. And I'll second.
Staff recommendation moved by Supervisor Hartman, seconded by Caps. Roll call please.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 Moved by Joan Hartmann moved by Supervisor Hartman, seconded by Caps. Roll call
Show transcript
0:55 – 0:585 turns
Motion passes 4-1
Mr. Chair, I just wanted to highlight this because...
Chair Levinino and members of the board, Administrative Item Number 16 is from the Community Services Department. It is to consider recommendations regarding Environmental Protection Agency EPA environmental justice community change grant application.
Yeah, I just wanted to highlight this because exciting things are happening in Cuyama. This would be a partnership with Blue Sky Center under the Resilient Cuyama Valley Initiative and to apply to EPA Environmental Justice Community Change Grant Program and I think Jesus Armas is still here to give you a little detail.
Good morning, Supervisor Williams through the chair. I want to first of all say we appreciate very much the board's support for efforts of this sort. We obviously at the staff level need to devote time and effort to a variety of opportunities and this is one where we've actually been invited to submit an application because of the work that the staff has already done in that part of our county We think that working with the various stakeholders that are listed in the board letter before you will afford us an opportunity to really make some significant progress in that area, especially with the opportunity to work with a school district in that area where it needs substantial assistance. So we're optimistic that we will prevail with this application and look forward to being able to return to you at such point as the application is funded and the grant awarded.
Thank you very much.
0:58 – 1:005 turns
Thank you. That takes us to A20.
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, Administrative Item number 20 is from the County Executive Office that is to consider recommendations regarding a response to the 2023 through 2024 grand jury report entitled Homeless Encampments in Santa Barbara County Becoming Part of the Community Again.
Supervisor Nelson?
I pulled this item because the encampment resolution has been an issue that I've really been passionate about from even my time as before being elected as a supervisor. You know, when I was chair that first year we had a special meeting on this and led towards our strategy on encampment resolution and then recently Supervisor Hartman asked for an item to come back to us on encampment resolutions and for the public that's going to be on October 8th.
In Santa Maria that we're going to potentially discuss that item to talk about what we've done as a county. Over the last few years and also in in consideration of the recent legal changes that have happened with the Supreme Court ruling on grants passed and how it affects the Boise decision which impacts our strategy moving forward. So all those things are together, but the grand jury took up this issue and I think they took it up on part because I brought it up in my conversation with them so I just wanted to acknowledge that we are moving forward and having a discussion about this. There is a lot of activity out there that is going to get reported You know, on the 8th. I know our office along with Supervisor Lavagnino have been doing a considerable amount of work in the Santa Maria Valley.
I know that my colleagues have been doing a lot of work in their various districts as well and so I just wanted to thank the Grand Jury for bringing this forward. I think it's very timely. We're not gonna have a full discussion today about it because we're gonna have that in the future but I just wanna make sure it didn't pass by without being recognized. So I don't wanna roll call vote or anything like that but I just definitely wanted to thank for highlighting this important issue in our community.
Great. Okay, that takes us to a 37.
1:00 – 1:077 turns
Chair Lavanino and members of the board, administrative item number 37 is sponsored by Supervisor Williams and Supervisor Hartman. It is to consider recommendations regarding the creation of a farm worker living wage temporary ad hoc advisory committee. And we currently have 12 requests to speak from the public on this item.
Okay, we have 12 requests to speak. I will close that roll at this time so those that are on the roll will be allowed to speak. We'll go three minutes apiece and do you want to lead it off Supervisor Nielsen or do you want to wait for public comment?
I just had a question for my colleagues is with this item distinguishing agriculture I didn't know if there had been any thought about including other industries in this moving forward that were distinguishing out one specific industry seems Concerning to me, you know there's a lot of other industries out there. If we're concerned about living wages that we should if we want to expand that or whether we should be in this in the first place and so I was wanting to know if there's any thought process on why we don't have one here hospitality food service health care nonprofit reporters education government workers manufacturing or construction all many of those employment sectors I believe the request from the public is to look at specifically the plight of farm workers and if you read that report, I don't think wage is the only issue.
There's cost of living, there are other things we should be
willing to take some public information about. I think there's also a lot of outstanding questions about why the labor market is the way it is, and some of that is related to the fact that many workers are already getting well over this wage and I think it's really at least for me one of the ways to, I view this more as an informational gathering at this point in time And I would like to understand how fast food joints can be mandated at 20 bucks an hour. You know, many sectors of the ag industry paying their workers year round well over $20 an hour if you include benefits and yet many farm labor contractors still paying 16, 17 dollars an hour with no benefits. If everybody's in a labor shortage I don't understand how they're able to get people right?
You have fast food joints who are getting paying 20 bucks an hour can't find enough people. If farming operations that are paying over $20 an hour cannot get enough people, then how are farm labor contractors that only pay $16 and $17 an hour getting anywhere near to enough people? So I think there's some labor dynamics that it would be really useful for society to understand.
And so I invite testimony from a number of different sources After we set up an ad hoc, but I think the request from the public to answer your question is specifically to concentrate on the issues with farm workers. And I think it's legitimate to entertain that request and to grant that request.
I guess we get a lot of requests here at the Board, but we don't necessarily always have ad hoc committees. And there's nothing that stops us all from having town halls. Supervisor Lavino and I had a town hall about Dignity Moves Projects, so did Supervisor Capsley and myself. I think the idea is when we have a formal ad hoc committee about a specific industry for a specific number, that sends a policy pathway You know, there's a lot of people out there that are really concerned about trying to figure out how their business still can continue.
We've actually had one business decide just since this last week that they're going to close up because they're just too concerned about what this looks like moving forward. They were on the edge already. So these signals from this board about a specific industry that might significantly impact them, their viability doesn't happen in a vacuum and so that's why I'm concerned about as we have this conversation and we hear from the public on whether we have an ad hoc committee You know, what are we doing as a board? Is this really a space that we want to get into because I think as soon If we did move down this pathway, why wouldn't others be far right behind them? And as you pointed out Supervisor Williams there doesn't seem to be a labor shortage for some of these farm labor contractors are still getting workers which probably means that some of the information is probably incorrect that we're getting from some of these advocacy groups.
Right if they're able to continue to get workers. So again as we go into here from the public on this I'm just wanted to get that out there. Any of our colleagues want to have a town hall in the future, I think that's really good. But I think we should all be very mindful about what messages we're sending up here as a board when we push through formal processes.
Evaluation is just usually a precursor to policy and I would Really want you all to be considerate as we move forward with that. These are people's livelihoods at stake, not just the farm workers and especially the farm workers because I think actually if we go down this path they're going to get hurt the most. Thank you.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well, I very much appreciate the question from my colleague Supervisor Nelson and I think the slippery slope argument is one that we really need to think about carefully. I do believe farm workers have a very different history in this country in terms of wages and how much state law and federal law Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to start by thanking the Board of Supervisors for this opportunity.
information and ideas in a public process to allow people to share so that we can all learn, and so the public can learn more about these essential farm workers and their contributions. And how that fits into an industry of a lot of small farmers many of them are leasing land they're not landowners and operating under a very tight margin So we want to learn about that and present that to the larger public for greater understanding.
1:07 – 1:1411 turns
All right, we have 12 public speakers.
I'm not attached to doing the ad hoc committee. If the board wants to just have a really long hearing, that next time we're in Santa Maria, we could just do that but I think that the purpose of an ad hoc is to make the Board's functions more efficient I'm not going to say that we're going to take public testimony and be able Workers don't get higher wages if jobs move to Baja, California. So there is a balance of information to get here that could be achieved by the ad hoc.
Well, I'm sorry. Just real quick for me it's you hit the nail on the head for me is that it's got to be an open and transparent process. And we're going to speak to everybody. I want to remind people two supervisors can go meet with whoever they would like to supervisor Nelson and I have done it. I'm sure you guys have all paired up and done things but if we form an ad hoc then it has to be you know the only way for that to work is to make sure as you said that we're listening to everybody you're hearing from everybody Everybody has a chance to have their voice heard.
The way I understand it would be then you would bring the information back to us, we would figure out at that point if it moves forward, if it doesn't move forward what the recommendations might And go from there. But my major concern is just making sure it's, I have served on ad hoc committees before and I will tell you the biggest criticism is if you don't make it public people feel like something's getting done behind closed doors and we absolutely don't want that to happen. We wanna invite everybody, everybody's opinion and everybody's perspective.
Absolutely that's our commitment. This is too important, sensitive an issue to I do think the reason for the ad hoc is so that we could actually bring in some speakers. I recently for example spoke to someone from the Strawberry Commission who had some very interesting information to share If we just hold a regular board meeting it may not be as easy to bring in. And if there are others like that, that we should be inviting I hope that the 12 speakers and others will let us know. So that's my pitch for why I think an ad hoc could more aggressively seek a variety of opinions in an open meeting in Santa Maria At a time convenient for people who are working on the land. And I'm sure other supervisors might be watching a recording or might even listen, but then we could bring it back again.
Okay. Supervisor Caps?
Well, I'm
supportive of ad hoc. I just appreciate the elaboration here of what this means and how the process works because if you judge by our emails we've already signed and delivered and agreed on this thing so there's a lot of alarm out there unnecessarily at this point. I don't mean to diminish industry's interest here but the nature of our emails are that again we've already completed So, I just thank you for explaining and to kind of elaborate on your philosophy and what the process means. Hopefully that is reassuring to some that this will be done with integrity.
Okay. Madam Clerk?
And Chair Lavinino, members of the Board, yes we have 12 requests to speak from the public. We'll begin here in Santa Barbara with Claire Weinman to be followed by Kevin Merrill.
Good morning, my name is Claire Weinman. I'm the president of the Grower Shipper Association of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. As champions of the agricultural community we oppose county actions that further isolate and debilitate Santa Barbara County directly on its continued vitality. We have not yet seen the details of the proposal beyond that it increases the minimum wage of some workers by as much as 62%.
However, it raises a number of serious concerns for farmers, vintners, supporting businesses, workers in our county including how will this local level of increase impact family farmers and vintners? Can they sustain any increases in costs much less than 62% increase in a local minimum wage How will this impact local jobs? How will this impact associated industries and businesses, many of which are small businesses.
How will this impact the cost of food and living in Santa Barbara County? How will this impact the use of land currently in agriculture? How will this impact local tax revenue? How will this impact the lives of many, many other hourly workers in Santa Barbara County? We believe the answers to these questions will show what a harmful and costly proposal this is.
We take issue with the county providing implicit endorsement of a county-level ordinance through the formation of a subcommittee, and strongly believe the Board of Supervisors should reject it outright at this juncture. We do not support the county driving a wedge in our agricultural community and its neighbors or targeting a single industry. If this does proceed, we ask that it slowly and carefully identify and consider the full ramifications of upending an entire industry and community and creating instant divisions.
We received another call yesterday from a member who is ending operations this year citing the unsustainable cost of doing business in Santa Barbara County. This action creates further doubt on whether continued investment in Santa Barbara County is feasible. Thank you
We will now go to Kevin Merrill to be followed by Pat Kimball, Kevin
1:14 – 1:216 turns
Good morning, Mr. Chair and fellow supervisors My name is Kevin Merrill and I am with the Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau representing them today as well as the State Farm Bureau. The Farm Bureau would like to be involved in any discussions related this wage increase proposal moving forward. We cautioned the board that if they adopt this $26 proposal, they will not be helping the people that they want to.
As growers in Santa Barbara County will simply not be able to offer their jobs at a $26 an hour rate. You're opening up yourselves To other industries that view themselves as worthy to the increase as well. What about those that work in county government? Specifically, the Ag Commissioner's Office who are charged with protecting agriculture from invasive pests that could threaten the very existence of our main crops in the county.
Where do we stop when we start going down this road and why are we penalizing one of the biggest employers in the county? We would ask that if a task force or ad hoc committee is needed, that the two supervisors from the North County be included as they represent the majority of agriculture in the county. It should also include representatives from ag organizations like the Farm Bureau, Grower Shippers, The Strawberry Commission, The Vintners Association and CAWS should sit on there as well.
Our ag economy in our county and state is extremely fragile With many growers going out of business or simply following ground, you only need to drive down the Highway 101 corridor to see hundreds of acres of wine grapes being pushed out right now. These grapes are not gonna be put back in the ground anytime soon and it's due to unfavorable market conditions and concerns over future supplies of irrigation water.
Due to uncertain economic consequences of an hourly rate ordinance We believe a secret review would be required before any ordinance is adopted. So thank you, so we are at the farm, we're ready to stand and help you and discuss this thing and get the answers you guys are looking for. Thank you very much.
We will now go to Pat Kimball to be followed by Christina Shallenberger, Pat?
Hello, Mr. Chairman and fellow board. Thank you for having me today. My name is Pat Kimball. I'm a lifelong resident and worker in this county. As much as we lament about corporate short-termism where short term profits outcompete long term viability or vitality, this well intentioned proposal is what I would call government short termism. This tendency Towards overregulation will only stimulate increased exodus of our means of production to outside our borders.
Currently, over 50% of our produce is imported from outside this country. Think about all the carbon that's wasted transporting this produce to America. That equates to about 52 billion pounds annually. If we're going to win this war on climate change We need to produce our food as locally as possible. We need to champion our means of production and self-sufficiency.
We need nurture the agricultural industry. How much have everyone ate this morning came from this country? Given the 52 billion pounds of food we import every year, maybe not much. Besides shelter what we put in our bodies is paramount. And don't you think locally produced food Harvested at peak freshness is best. Let's quit chasing farmers off and spend our energy keeping farmers farming.
There's a smart group of people here that should be able to hammer out the solution, and I would hope that all stakeholders are invited to the table. Thank you.
We will now go to Christina Schallenberger to be followed by Carlos Castadeda. Christina? Thank you.
Good morning. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the board for the opportunity to speak today. My name is Christina Schallenberger and I'm employed by an agricultural company in Santa Barbara County. According to the 2024 Chief Executive Best and Worst States for Business Survey California once again comes in dead last we are 50th in the nation The exodus and or closure of California businesses has continued over the last decade, citing in their wake the state's ever-expanding regulatory and taxation climate. This minimum wage increase proposal would without a doubt put some growers likely those who were small or mid-sized out of business They don't have the luxury of picking up their soil and weather to move out of state although some can move south Following their closure, worker layoffs would ensue an unintended consequence of what this proposal is trying to achieve.
We could compare this $26 minimum wage proposal to California's recent Fast Food Act which has ignited a complex cascade of consequences. Fast food establishments cut nearly 10,000 jobs in the wake of the act. If your job wasn't eliminated it's likely your hours were cut by ten percent effectively reducing your take-home pay despite the higher hourly wage. AI and automation has accelerated quickly in the fast food industry since the minimum wage increase. They've added AI generated bots for taking orders, added self-service ordering and payment kiosks in restaurant lobbies.
This poses a severe threat to employment potentially leading to a significant reduction in the need for human labor. Considering this, could Governor Newsom have approached the minimum wage issue more effectively? The apparent lack of a data-driven strategy and anticipating the economic repercussions reflects a critical oversight. As of February 2024 there were approximately 46 County of Santa Barbara employment classifications that start at less than $26 per hour. It's estimated there are over 400 employees of Santa Barbara County currently making less than what is being considered in this proposal.
Some of these positions require certification and higher education, whereas others require experience. Some of the classifications include ambulance EMT, child support officer, building permit techs, medical assistants, water and sewage plant operators, et cetera. Perhaps the supervisor should consider whether regulating wages in private industries is appropriate.
And should the board still decide to move forward with an ad hoc committee after everything they hear today, I respectfully argue against the appointment of Supervisor Das Williams to such a committee. Supervisor Williams has virtually no row crops in his district and cannot effectively provide representation for the majority of constituents affected by this proposal.
Thank you.
We will now go to Carlos Castaneda, to be followed by Patrick Kimball. Carlos?
1:21 – 1:274 turns
Good morning Mr. Chairman and Board. My name is Carlos Castaneda I represent over a thousand employees in both SLO and Santa Barbara County working agriculture. I'd like to open with a quote by Ernest Hemingway says how did you go bankrupt Two ways, gradually then suddenly. In the past 12 months I've seen both of these. I had one grower filed the Warren Act laying off hundreds of employees.
He was a nursery flower grower. Had another grower filed bankruptcy just suddenly surprising us all. He was in the vineyard industry. And I've had a third grower who's been farming for generations just calling it quits Just said he can't take the regulatory burden. Hundreds, if not thousands of families were affected by these layoffs. This is three and this is just little old me was affected by three growers and thousands of families.
So to put that in perspective I've only seen one grower shut down the past 30 years and that's because he lost the battle to cancer. This current proposal reminds me of Assembly Bill 1066. And the intention behind that was to eliminate Wage Order 14, which reduced work week from 60 hours to 40. My family, my friends and my employees all lost a third of their income.
I warn the NGOs, the unintended consequences have dire effects. In fact, a study conducted by UC Berkeley showed that farm workers lost up to $9 million of income due to the new law. I'd like to close with another quote, this time by Dwight D Eisenhower. Farming looks mighty easy when your pencil's a plow and the farm ground is over 1,000 miles away. Thank you.
We will now go to Patrick Kimball to be followed by Russell Doody We did have a Pat Kimball. Same, okay thank you. We will now go to Russell Doody to be followed by Fernando Martinez.
Morning, Chair Delavanino and board members. I kind of want to just talk to you about my experience as a farmer and what a $26 an hour minimum wage would do to us. If I have three full-time employees myself is number four and I have in the summers my niece that works for us and I have a part time kid that works for us if the $26 amount our minimum wage were to start today I get rid of my part-time, my niece and one of my full time people. $26 minimum wage we just cannot handle it.
If you really would like to help ag workers make it an easier process for us to get ag employee housing Make it less expensive. Like I said, I have three full-time employees. If I could get all of them living on the ranch, that's a $3,500 a month raise in our town. If that were an easier process and a less expensive process, I would do that tomorrow. Also, when we're talking about family farms in Santa Barbara County.
That's something that is important to myself and my family and I'm sure to many other families in Santa Barbara County. One of the ways I get my family involved is like I said, my niece she works for me. She's a sophomore at Dos Palos High School. She works for me this summer. I'm not going to pay 16 year old high school girl $26 an hour to check irrigation But you know what it does for me? It gets them a love for our farming, for our ranch and want them to come back and take part in that when they grow up which is important to our family. And I'm sure many other families in Santa Barbara County.
Guess that's all I really have but yeah $26 minimum wage You know pretty much put us out of business. Thanks.
We will now go to Fernando Martinez to be followed by Daniel Segura Fernando.
1:27 – 1:357 turns
Yes, buenos dias. Good morning Chair Labanino and board members. My name is Fernando Martinez and I'm excited and honored to speak again regarding this important issue. I serve as a community organizer for MECOP here in Santa Maria and I'm here on behalf of Alianza Campesina. First of all, I would like to start by expressing our gratitude For your attention regarding the critical issue of a living wage for farm workers in Santa Barbara County, which was brought up in the previous meeting in Santa Maria.
In the previous meeting not only have you heard from myself and other advocates but you have personally heard from farm workers themselves regarding the current minimum wage that has not kept up with the cost of living we all know The families are struggling, especially farm workers who we have considered essential workers in the past. But now that the pandemic it's over like we kind of have push away from essential workers.
Many families are living in overcrowded housing conditions and struggling to make ends meet. And most of the time, What to call placing their families in harsh conditions and no family deserves to be, you know going through that especially living in a state where you know the industry where they work is one of the top industries with the highest revenue within the past few years.
Not only do I speak as an advocate but I speak as a person who worked in the strawberry fields. I worked with a small farm owner for about 10, 15 years since I was like 13 and I helped this family up until I was in high school. Eventually went off to college and now coming back to support our community and see how we can ensure that our essential farm workers are compensated properly. And I understand the comments of other folks who say this can cause companies to close down. And you know, I think that possibly- That is your time. Can be a good argument but I also see that we're having a lot of guest workers here. So, I just want to encourage the ad hoc
committee. That was the end of your public speaking time. I'm sorry. That's your three minutes. Thank you.
We will now go to Daniel Segura to be followed by Mike Stoker.
Good morning, Chair and Board of Supervisors. My name is Daniel Segura, Associate Organizing Director with CAWS and part of Alianza Campesina and I'm speaking in support of Administrative Item 837. I thank you for taking a crucial step to formally begin discussing the important issue of farmworker wages here in the county with farmworker community. Conversation has ignited throughout the county as we all are well aware and farmworkers and families have been filled with hope at the message that our elected officials are hearing their voices.
Special thanks to Vice Chair Capps for highlighting the efforts of farm workers over the Labor Day weekend in her district newsletter. Your commitment to serving this county is not always an easy job, but nonetheless your elected responsibility. Moving forward I hope that you seriously consider the proposal of higher wages for farm workers as has been the primary point voiced by workers across our region.
Our community is not naive. We know this is a conversation and proposal that will require time, hard work, nuance and money. I am an advocate for agriculture, have love for farming and possess the agricultural literacy to understand why this industry is so important in our county and have incredible respect for those that work the land and feed the world especially small family farms. However what is not debatable is that wages for farm workers are currently not enough Like mentioned earlier today, we have one of the highest poverty rates in our state. And with the fall and winter fast approaching I reflect on the reality that thousands of farm worker families in the county are dreading a time of year that are filled with so much joy and money for others.
With their hours cut short or entirely many will rely on limited resources such as food distributions to survive. I also can't help but reflect on the recent heat wave we had last week When many families were headed to the beach to cool off, farmworkers were still in the field ensuring that we had food on our table. Extreme heat is just one example of hazardous working conditions for farm workers. Let's ensure that we're thinking of lives and livelihoods as these conversations begin, and not just profits.
Alianza Campesina will do everything to ensure that farmworkers are engaged in this conversation and that we ask all of you to be conscious of the fact making these meetings in the evening and to provide adequate interpretation so that farm workers and the community at large can attend and properly have their voices heard. You'll have the ability to change the reality of our families I urge you to have the courage to fully discuss this proposal in an open and transparent manner. Thank you for your time and consideration.
We will now go to Mike Stoker to be followed by Tracy Baird.
Mr. Chair, honorable members of the board Mike Stoker president CEO of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayer Advocacy Center on behalf of our over 300 business members I went off script because I listened to The questions that I think Supervisor Williams asked I would say on behalf of our members you're really putting the cart before the horse You know when I sat where you sat if I thought you had great questions Supervisor Williams And there's very, very good answers to them.
And when I sat where you sat if I would have had those questions, I would have gone to agriculture first and said, you know, I have these questions. If you can't answer them, I'm actually thinking of being the only county in the state of California that's going to have a minimum wage of $26 for the farm worker. Had you done that, agriculture could have given you those answers. And we still can. I mean if you want to take minimum wage off the table and have an advisory group to study the wage component of agricultural farm workers, we can give you great, great answers to that. And I think what you're going to find is agricultural farm workers actually get paid more than a lot of other employees in a lot of other sectors that gets into Supervisor Nelson's component.
I don't know if you're aware between two statewide ag associations, one is called Western Grows Association the other United Ag they provide health insurance that was why they were created for their employer members they provide health insurance for over 80,000 farm workers in this state. A lot of workers in this state don't get health insurance through an employee So there's an equity component here that I really think you need to look at and you've opened up the hornet's nest by just saying, I don't have these answers. So I'm assuming certain answers so we should just be the only county to impose this kind of condition on agriculture in this time period. I can't even get in the parameters in terms of agriculture is one of the few sectors They compete every day globally with people that can pick food in Argentina today and having a Walmart supermark tomorrow paying $2 an hour not having the labor laws we have, not having the environmental laws.
All those additional costs so we're looking forward to working with you on this I don't think it ever should have been under the name of a minimum wage that's getting the ag community riled up but we'll give you those answers and I'm glad it's going to be an open process and I would just ask to make sure it really is transparent And gives everybody an opportunity to participate. As you all know, the Vintners are a very important component of agriculture in this county. Their harvest season as you all know is in September to mid late October.
So I would ask that the first, I'm assuming you're going to go forward with an ad hoc committee even though I wish you wouldn't but if you are, I would ask that you have that first meeting for the public no earlier than late October or early November so the Vintners can participate as much as everyone else. Thank you very much.
We will now go to Tracy Baird, then we will go to Zoom with Terri Strickland. Tracy?
1:35 – 1:428 turns
Thank you all. I believe fostering a strong economic community is rooted in all local businesses and the hard work. I understand the challenges of small business, what it's faced. It is crucial that they are not government Oversight by their wages. Business owners are responsible for employees' day-to-day operation, giving the best insight for appropriate compensation. As a former HR person of over 3,000 managers I've hired and 12,000 employees I've overseen at Marriott, the responsibility of a manager it is their responsibility to set the wages, collaborate with business. This is why we have minimum wage. We have review process.
It is not for politicians to decide what one sector makes. I am concerned of the wage impact on the farm workers. We have community, while our farm workers deserve a fair compensation we also must consider the ripple effect. Santa Barbara County lives on tourism and agriculture. Raising the rates in one section will lead to the increased costs for everyone. Example, a bottle of wine will turn into from a $32 bottle of wine to a $47 bottle of wine. A pinot will go from $40 to $67 a bottle. These increases are very high. We already are struggling in the tourism industry in small business. We cannot afford to take the steps to burden our businesses Within the agricultural section of Ways and Ranges. Let's look at the non-profit sector, let's look at your own employees within the contract labor.
Our substitute teachers right now are only making $24.50 an hour. The medical worker that did a mammogram was $25 an hour. These are issues that are larger from a broken immigration system that needs compensation reform, not just wage fixing. We need to ensure workers are documented, they correctly have a fair wage. We must do so and help them a pathway to citizenship. Let's do something better than try to increase wages for a sector. Let us do something better. Are they going to be able to afford the lettuce that is going to be $5.75 a head, the strawberry that's $9.50 a pint?
You have to think about this before you start. It's an ongoing ripple effect down we must come up with solutions fair wages the long term I think we live very much on small business it is an opportunity to make sure you take care of yourselves first before you start taking care of everyone else. We cannot afford it in the bakeries, we cannot afford it up in the valley thank you.
We will now go to Zoom with Terri Strickland who is our final speaker on this item. Terri, you are unmuted but we cannot hear you.
Can you hear me now?
We can please proceed.
Chair Lavinino on board. First of all, I can't believe we're even having this conversation. Mike Stoker said it well you opened up a hornet's nest with this minimum wage. Of course, I'm opposed to this ad hoc committee. And but if you do go forward, I believe it should be the North County supervisors that should be on this committee. As a supervisor Williams comments regarding he wants people to make more money well. Most employers would like to be able to pay their employees more, but they know the cost of doing business. You don't know that you don't run a business on a daily basis. They do.
The board has no business getting involved in this issue as the gentleman said who farms himself. You want to do something to help? I believe he nailed it, you know less regulations regarding housing for farm workers is a good start. That's exactly what you could do to make a difference in farm workers lives immediately. The other gentleman said and I loved it. He said keep farmers farming this plan could kill local farming or our local farming families that have been doing this for generations This is not government's job, this is not your job.
Supervisor Nelson was exactly correct. If you move forward with this what other sectors are next? Thank you.
And that concludes public comment on this
item. Bringing it back to the Board, Supervisor Nelson.
Yes thank you Chair Labadino. You know I think as we talked about it earlier It's kind of what's the harm in having a discussion? And I think you're seeing what the harm in having the discussion is. You have one group that's really afraid of being put out of business, and then you have another group, Mr. Segura said there's a lot of hope in the community because now you've set up expectations.
that our board is going to move forward with the living wage. So we've kind of rolled out the grenade there and it's going to explode at some point and somebody is going to get hurt, and that's what I think is scary about doing this as an official county ad hoc committee. Maybe it's the framing of this and maybe this is where I can try to add some input that might help soften this. It's a creation of farm worker living wage temporary ad hoc committee.
Okay, so that sends a signal that there's a policy movement towards the living wage. You know what I heard from Supervisor Williams and Supervisor Hartman was you guys want to look at what are things the county can do that are impacting farm workers? And there's so many more things than just the living wage. Maybe if we broaden the discussion and took away from the living wage conversation because I think that's where the focus is and the division is, to just kind of overall health of that community and how the county's interacting with that, then that really broadens discussion. Maybe taps down the concern from the industry.
Maybe softens expectation from those advocates that think they might be walking out of here with a $26 an hour minimum wage when we're done with it. That may be a place where we can land this. I think that might help people. We are doing a lot in this county You know, I came along kicking and screaming on this Farm Worker Resource Center but I'm super proud of it. It's gonna be one of the big things that I think I'm gonna be most proud of when I'm done being a supervisor and we've done a lot there.
There's a lot more we can do with housing. I proudly serve on DeKalb Vans Board Directors as their Vice Chair. I'm working hard to make sure that there's carpool options for our farm workers. We're doing a lot already and I think that's part of the broader conversation and the messaging that I think that we need to get out there as a board is that we are doing a lo here. Can we do more? Yes. Do we need to go down the nuclear option of a minimum wage?
And then where that slippery slope goes from there, I don't think we need to do that. So I would prefer that we not have a living wage ad hoc committee. Rather if some board members wanted to explore that specificity that they just have a town hall and doesn't have the endorsement of the county so it sends a little bit different message to all the parties involved. That would be my input as we discuss this.
1:42 – 1:527 turns
Well I think all good points. I think that it's important to indicate that this is not a invention of Supervisor Hartman and myself, this is a request from the public and requests from the public of people who are legitimately hurting. And I am not going to close my ears to their pleas, they deserve it to be heard. And that is... And I do agree that the danger in such a situation is that you know, it can get people amped up Thank you.
route. We've seen just here today two important aspects of this discussed, Tracy brought up comprehensive immigration reform which is a huge part of this we don't have a whole lot of power on it but Russell brought up farmworker housing which we should have more power on we did have an initiative we did make it easier and yet production hasn't worked out the way that we intended. And so it may be a very productive thing for us to be looking at that again. So, you know I think that we should be examining this from multiple aspects because the situation that farm workers are in and by extension farmers, I believe that the interests are not zero sum right?
That the situation and the plight of farm workers is a legitimate one that we should look at, see if we can address in some manner. And move forward with the ad hoc. So I'll move the item.
Supervisor Hartman?
I think Supervisor Nelson's suggestion of changing the name and broadening the scope Thank you very much. I hadn't realized in some instances how critical things are right now for agriculturalists. And, I think this is an opportunity to understand that and if we just spoke with you individually the public as a whole wouldn't understand and it wouldn't raise to the level of visibility that we have an opportunity to do so I'm very much Eager to have this, I would like Supervisor Williams if you would consider renaming it so that we do broaden the scope.
I think that's a good suggestion and then I would second your motion.
I would accept that amendment and second.
All right.
I just weigh in a little bit You know, I think the county as Bob pointed out has been doing a lot. First off, he's not here today but... That's all right. Name that tune anybody? Anybody got it? No. Sorry. Is when we hired Jose Chang is our Ag Commissioner I think one of the main reasons why I was sold on him was because I thought, I think he has a really good foot in each camp.
He's respected highly by the farmers and ranchers and he's also respected by the farm worker community where you know, he's our face out there so that for me was a big move forward. You know, when we had COVID, we had all these supply chain issues. And I remember I was trying to buy a stove and it took me like nine months to get the stove and other people were trying to buy a car and it took two years to get a car because they had supply chain issues and you couldn't get this.
I can wait for a stove and I could wait for a car. We got to be really careful about what we do because food source you can't wait for so We've got to be very careful, look at all unintended consequences. We don't want to create more problems than what we're trying to address. For those that have spoken against creating an ad hoc committee it took me a while to come to grips with it but what I really realized at the end of the day is this issue's going to be studied one way or the other so we can either have two supervisors go off into and have a meeting which they're allowed to do and it might not be public You might not have a chance to speak.
They might only hear one side of the story, and that would all be legitimate. And they could come back and say here we'd like to put this on as an agenda item and move forward. That could happen. That's legal. That's what could happen. If you create an ad hoc subcommittee then it's open and it's transparent, and your side gets to be heard. All sides get to get heard.
I think you heard that they're both walking into this, you know wanting to hear both sides of the story. So for me ag number one economic engine of the county we definitely have to strike this balance I support the idea of renaming it I think that's a really good that's a really good idea and the only concern I have well not the only concern but one of the major concerns was when we say well the community came and asked us to do this The business community in Santa Barbara County has gotten hoarse trying to ask us for, to deregulate and to soften some requirements.
And they're done asking, you know? It's just... They felt like it fell on deaf ears. So I'm sure that- That's gonna leave a bad taste in some people's mouth. But I hope people leave here realizing that this ad hoc subcommittee is gonna be open, transparent. You'll be able to have your point brought across. There's no recommendation. They can't create something that doesn't come to the full Board of Supervisors and have a full hearing on what they found. And the good news is there could be something that we have overlooked as it comes to housing that could be a huge game changer And that it might be just tied up, spooled around our own axle that we didn't know and we couldn't get out of our own way.
So I think Supervisor Nelson also brought up a great point about the county looking inward a little bit. It's easy to look out and point your finger, it's a little bit harder to analyze yourself and find out how we're paying our own employees and what we're asking them to do. Also I think there is if I'm not mistaken there's a ballot measure In November, Prop 32 that will also increase the minimum wage for everybody in California. So I'm going to go to Supervisor Capps first and then we'll move along.
Thank you Chair. I appreciate where you're going with this and this has been really enlightening. I've learned a lot. I look forward to learning a lot more. I think every argument was made with respect and all things are true right? There's a lot to balance here and in terms of walking into a hornet's nest That's what we're here for. I mean, we're here for the tough stuff with due respect. I appreciate sort of the warning but I think that we can do this. I can think we can figure something out. I support broadening it because housing is the key factor when you look at every measurement why we have such high poverty rates women children I mean, down the line we're either number two or we're number three at high poverty rates. Housing is the bullets, it's the target, it's what we need to be dealing with and I'm very curious.
I spoke to a farmer in Supervisor Williams District and he said, I offer housing to my 18 farm workers I want to know, how is that impacting? What does that mean for wages? How many farmers do offer housing? So I look forward to this committee. I appreciate the flexibility of changing the name by the two committee members. It looks like we're heading in that direction and I think we have a lot to learn and I think we can do hard things.
1:52 – 1:5720 turns
Yes, thank you Chair LaVenue and it seems like this is moving towards approval. Just one additional nuance here is I think that this is probably more than one meeting and it's probably a longer discussion than just late October early November. I understand that Supervisor Williams' time on the board is getting close to an end but when he has concluded maybe it could be considered as an alternate? for this so that when Supervisor Williams is done, because I know right now they have a Brown Act relationship between Supervisor Hartman and Supervisor Williams. Maybe that gives me an opportunity to add that voice. I know there's been some of those have asked for either Supervisor Labadino or I to sit on this. So I guess what I'd ask which would get my support today is if I could be the alternate when Supervisor William turns out of this subcommittee?
I'm OK with that.
Yeah. Supervisor Hartman?
I think that's an excellent idea. Chair Lavanino, I just had to take issue with something that you said and that is that business gets nothing from us. I attended a recent South Coast Chamber event where you were the featured speaker. I know we worked very carefully with the South Coast Chamber on their housing initiative We're working on energy security initiative and as Tracy Beard knows her chamber is very active and we try to support and hear and listen. So, we do want to be a business friendly board and if there's more we can do we're eager to find out.
Supervisor Williams.
Mr.
Chair,
members of the board I just want to clarify one thing so when we're discussing having an alternate supervisor that won't work in this context because an ad hoc committee is less than a quorum but if we're talking about if the committee continues in January That my recommendation would be just bringing the item back and then we could appoint another supervisor. And then we wouldn't have it because I just wanted to be clear on the record that we're not having three participate right now.
Okay, Supervisor Williams. Yeah I was prompted by one of the things and thank you for mentioning this supervisor caps. You know, I think it's I know we're in the age where people just say you know sometimes what they feel or they say they repeat what someone else said that just as saying what they feel but I think it's really important for this discussion to be you know double check and triple check accuracy of statements in it because there's a lot of others about A lot of people in Cuyama that would be really shocked to find that they have virtually no row crops.
In fact, it would contradict what they could look out and see as they drive every day. And you know it's an area of my district I'm really proud to represent and put a lot of time and love in. So you know I just think let's try to do that. I think it's just one of those things about you know, having a respectful conversation.
Okay so is there a motion and let's wait hold on CEO Miyazato?
Just supervisors I want to clarify the way that the board letter reads now I just want to make sure we're getting it down this create an ad temporary Ad Hoc Advisory Committee to work on an information item regarding farmworker wages in Santa Barbara and appoint Supervisors Doss Williams and Supervisor Joan Hartman. I believe you're saying create a temporary Ad Hoc Advisory Committee to work on farm worker conditions in Santa Barbara County and appoint Supervisor Doss Williams and Supervisor Joan Hartman to the ad hoc committee.
Fair.
Thank you.
OK, great. And I just want to ask that we can get confirmation from the dais that the scheduling timing with the Vintners Association and all those that work in the wine industry of it, we don't somehow
We had anticipated that anyway but yes.
Great, okay very good so do we have a motion and a second? Supervisor Williams made the motion. Do we need a roll call? All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously and one question I have is how are we going to go about getting the information out to the public of when a proposed meeting would be?
I think that's one of the advantages of having an ad hoc as opposed to Joan and I just holding a meeting because the county does have a notice system. Oh
yeah, it would have to be properly noticed and we'll make sure we broadcast it out here from the board. The dais of when something actually gets on the dais.
Supervisors, what we've done in the past also is the two ad hoc members could just put a item that just says when the meeting is that they've, the date of the meeting that they've determined and time and place for the rest of the public to know.
Okay great. We still need a motion on and a vote on A16 and A20.
With staff recommendations?
1:57 – 2:0418 turns
Second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Those also pass. OK, before we get to public comment, I think we have about 10 public comment speakers. We're going to take a ten minute break. We'll be back at 1115.
We are going to begin with Marcia Wirtz, to be followed by Leanne Wolever. Marcia?
Did Marcia leave?
I'm
sorry. Marcia
had to leave
because she had a job
at 11 o'clock she had to be at
so
that's why
we took a little bit longer this morning than we normally do sorry about that
okay Anyway, my name is Leanne Woliver. I am the Chair for the State of New California. We are reading this resolution to all 52 counties so I will cover as much as I can. The people of California are suffering from a tyrannical state government which fails to provide a Republican form of government Enables and supports across the southern border, the invasion of the United States of America by illegal foreign nationals and protects vicious criminals who commit outrageous acts of violence upon the citizens of America. All caused by a government of and for a monoparty system led by a tyrannical dictator who openly defies federal law. California's monoparty political machine, its socialist governor along with the Communist State Legislature's socialist elected officials.
Agencies and unelected regional governance boards are colluding to create a communist California state in direct violation of both Article 4 Section 4 and Article 6 Thank you, Mr. President. After over 155 years of hard work to destroy all vestiges of the United States Constitution by using the 1879 Constitution and through court decisions, over 920 amendments to the California Constitution. Massive taxes, strangulating regulations, regionalism, deliberate destruction of the United States' premier education and economic systems along with the raping of one of the planet's finest environmental zones The stage is now being set for the final nails into California's totalitarian coffin. Since the mid-1900s, California has been a monoparty system.
Over the years, the noose around the state Republican form of government has been tightened with bogus constitutional amendments that include redistricting congressional and state seats resorting to a political party Killing Amendment Proposition 14 that allows the two top vote-getting candidates from the state's primaries to move on to the general elections regardless of party affiliation.
Worse yet, since passage of the 2010 Proposition 14 criminal cartels have taken control of the poorest southern border of California and have established operations to traffic human slaves and to distribute massive amounts of fentanyl that kills thousands Americans each year. This operation run by the cartel networks works in conjunction with the government finance non-governmental agencies, and have taken control of California's political machine.
Thank you.
We will now go to Linda Kropp.
Supervisor Hartman?
Yes, I need to recuse myself from this matter because this issue affects my personal property.
Thank you we will now go to Linda Kropp to be followed by Diana Sandoval. Linda?
Good morning Chair Lavinio and members of the board. I'm Linda Kropp Chief Counsel with the Environmental Defense Center appearing on behalf of the EDC Get Oil Out and Santa Barbara County Action Network. We learned last week that the county agreed to settle litigation brought by Sable Offshore Corporation, challenging the county's recent refusal to approve Sable's plan to install valves and restart the corroded pipeline that spilled in 2015.
The county's denial was appropriately based on concerns of another oil spill. In fact this concern was confirmed by a recent draft environmental impact report prepared by the county that concluded that even with new valves, this pipeline is likely to spill every year, rupture every four years with the consequence of a spill being twice nearly twice the size of the 2015 spill. This is the county's own environmental review.
As you can imagine, we were alarmed to learn of the settlement in which the county agreed to reconsider its authority over the pipeline without public notice or hearing. The county agreed with Sable that it had no jurisdiction over this pipeline and its potential restart and installation of new valves. This is a major decision with tremendous consequence. We submitted a letter on Friday to the planning department which I've just passed out now, pointing out that Sable's claim of federal preemption does not apply because this is not a federally regulated pipeline. After the 2015 spill, the federal government agreed that this is an intrastate pipeline. It has always operated as an intrastate pipeline and there was agreement between the federal government planes which owned the pipeline at the time and the state That regulatory authority would transfer from the federal government to the state.
Now, the State Office of Fire Marshal has jurisdiction over the safety elements of this pipeline so there is no federal preemption. We in our letter asked for an opportunity for public comment. This is a really important issue I've never seen the county settle a case without a public hearing. So our request is that the county put its decision on hold, hold a public hearing, allow for input and then make a decision on this issue.
Thank you we appreciate your consideration.
And my apologies Diana actually while we have Supervisor Hartman recused we're going to a few more members of the public speaking on this similar issue so we are going to zoom with Hillary Hauser to be followed by Noah Boland.
2:04 – 2:129 turns
Good. Oh, good afternoon Supervisors Chair Lavagnino and Supervisor. It's Hilary Hauser I'm still the Heal the Ocean Executive Director not exactly retired yet and I'm here today to support the Environmental Defense Center request for a public hearing on the Sable Pipeline case this is a huge matter ADC has pointed out a technical issue that may well prove that the county does have jurisdiction.
And I think it's really worth it to open this up so that there can be a rediscussion of those technical issues Really would appreciate the Board of Supervisors honoring this because it's an enormous issue for the County of Santa Barbara, the people of the County of Santa Barbara about oil transportation pipes leakage. And so we'd really like to ask you to grant EDC its request for a public hearing. Thank you so much.
We will now go to Noah Boland to be followed by Brady Bradshaw, both on Zoom. Noah?
Good morning Board of Supervisors. My name is Noah Boland and I'm a policy analyst with Heal the Ocean. I'm commenting today ultimately to echo some of the comments that you just heard from Linda Kropp and Hilary Hauser. And that is to ask you to please schedule a public hearing on the issue of Disabled Pipeline The Board of Supervisors and the public need to discuss the Environmental Defense Center's position, which is that the county does indeed have jurisdiction over the Sable Pipeline Revised Plan.
The technicalities by which this situation became a surprise require careful examination and so we please ask that these technicalities get aired and that this decision is reconsidered. Thank you.
We will now go to Brady Bradshaw to be followed by Karen Hauenstein.
Hello, can you hear me?
Yes we can. Please proceed.
Thank you. Good morning Chair Levin, UNO and Supervisors. My name is Brady Bradshaw representing the Center for Biological Diversity and our members and supporters in Santa Barbara County. We echo the Environmental Defense Center's concerns described in their September 6th letter. We were alarmed to see the communications staff for planning and development Issue pronouncements that the county had no jurisdiction over a revised valves plan, but the public has not even seen or had an opportunity to provide input to. Too much of this process is happening behind closed doors for an issue as important as restarting these corroded pipelines that have already failed disastrously once We need transparency and accountability from the county. The county should retract its acknowledgement immediately to allow for that process to happen.
It appears county staff is also wrong in its conclusions, and that the county is not preempted from exercising jurisdiction here. As EDC noted, the pipeline system never was an interstate And in any case, the county retains its police powers to prevent harm to people and the environment. As noted in the draft EIR for the Abandoned Pipeline Replacement Project, the Office of State Fire Marshal has previously reported a five times increase in failure frequencies for pipelines that are not equipped with cathodic protection over the average failure rate.
In addition, because the existing pipeline is older it could experience a higher failure rate due to age. That draft EIR estimated that restarting lines 901 and 903 could result in a spill once a year and a rupture once every four years even with the installation of additional valve stations as now proposed. Please suspend the preemption determination and schedule public hearing on the matter. Thank you.
We will now go to Karen Hauenstein and then we will return to Diana Sandoval. Karen?
Hello again, supervisors. So this issue coming up today is proving some really bad optics that now exist for you guys because here we are and I noticed that they introduce everything that the progressives want to bring in through the planning commission. It's all planned just like The cockfighting ordinance that Joan brought in, and she planned it through the planning and then kind of snuck it in there. And then all of a sudden it was a big issue that was actually preventing my neighbor from building his home. And he now has a lawsuit against the county.
You know, the thing that I've been noticing about the progressive overreach That this board has allowed to happen by having too many liberals on the board, is that like what you guys do? You're like now feel your power and you wanna do all you can before you leave the dais. So you have all of these issues coming up where you're delving into areas that you shouldn't be touching things that affect our economy And our economies of scale that already operate here in our county that keep all of us moving and living and going forward.
I've seen where partisan actions have taken place that do not protect all of our residents, The overreach with this issue, we all know that the pipelines if they are continued to be maintained on our land are gonna eventually have security cameras and other technology that helps us watch where we weren't watching before. I mean, I'm sure those are being considered. So when people are calling up and making statements that we're gonna have to deal with all of these oil spills like they have a crystal ball and they can tell what's gonna happen, I wish that people would have been looking at the issues that came up when Dennis Bozanich was leading the county because what he did Through his, and I'm not gonna call him Dennis Bozanich anymore. I'm gonna call him Dennis Bozo because he treated our county like a circus.
And then what he did is through his personal actions caused the county to have significant settlements that the county has to pay out millions of dollars. So you guys really need to think about the bottom line The effects of what you're making decisions on today. Thank you.
2:12 – 2:186 turns
I believe that closes that topic, we will now go to Diana Sandoval to be followed by Daniela Loveall.
Dear Chair and Board of Supervisors, I'm Diana Sandoval and this is my sixth time before you. On August 29th the New York Times published an article titled How Real Estate Boom Drove Political Corruption in Los Angeles. As outlined in the article, the concentration of power in local government and weakened news media created an environment ripe for corruption.
I believe a similar situation is happening here in Santa Barbara County and the public needs to know. Under the leadership of Lisa Plowman, who you appointed as Director of Planning and Development, and Craig Johnson in Building and Safety there have been ongoing issues including false statements, record tampering, disregard for laws, and even the illegal taking away property which Mr. Johnson knowingly authorized in violation of my constitutional rights.
Since April, I've raised these concerns with County Executive Officer Mona Miyasato, Wade Horden, the Planning Commission, County Council and all of you. Mr. Lavinino, Ms. Capps, Ms. Hartman, Mr. Williams and Mr. Nelson. Despite providing clear evidence from county emails and documents, I've seen no meaningful action from the Board of Supervisors. Coincidentally on the same day that The New York Times published its article on corruption, I had a board of building appeal hearing which was not fair or impartial For over a month leading up to the hearing, I made nine requests for the rules and procedures yet Santa Barbara County Planning and Development withheld the necessary information and submission deadline. They only provided them less than 72 hours before the hearing.
During the hearing the board repeatedly questioned the building official on what they called a quote controversial issue however instead of addressing the facts the building official provided false statements Rather than holding the building official accountable for the false statements, which the board themselves disproved using the county's own documents, the board dismissed the appeals.
At the end, the chair shook hands with a building official and gave him a thumbs up suggesting clear bias. The board's denial of my building appeals on August 29th 2024 is legally flawed. They disregard local and state laws as well as clear evidence in testimony presented by the applicant's own engineer The decision was ultimately influenced by false statements made by the building official and marked by traveling patterns of incompetence, negligence, unfairness and bias. All which undermine the integrity of the permitting and appeal process.
I'm calling on the Board of Supervisors to initiate an independent investigation into the conduct of planning and development, and building and safety under Lisa Plowman and Craig Johnson. The public deserves transparency and accountability especially when there are clear patterns of misconduct and constitutional violations. This isn't just about my case it's about protecting the fairness and integrity of our local government.
See you at the next meeting
We will now go to Danielle Lovell, to be followed by Sherry Foster who is our final speaker. Danielle?
Hello my name's Danielle Lovell and I'm the author of this article that I put in The Independent Horses Needing Legal Protection in Buolton California and I'm following up because with numerous conversations and emails with Supervisor Hartman I was wondering if ever was this topic brought to your attention
It's public comment. We don't talk back and forth, so.
Okay because I don't think it's going anywhere and I just feel like these horses are just suffering endlessly day after day, year after year. And for Supervisor Hartman to say that it was controversial, these horses are stuck in corrals with absolutely no shade whatsoever from the blazing hot sun. And standing in the sun like that, it's a lot hotter than 113 degrees. And I was told that a few of those horses have died So this is actually torture to murder. And I would really appreciate if you would just make the law, the minimum standard of care law so that people like Jan Martin who is profiting off of shoving embryos into those horse's uterus which is a trauma to begin with, who lets those horses stand there all winter long in atmospheric rivers and mud which we know is unhealthy for them and they're standing there freezing wet soaking cold and below freezing temperatures and forced to lay And a manure and urine saturated mud, and their hooves can get fungus and they're forced to eat wet hay is just totally unacceptable.
And there's no reason for it because clearly Buell for Buellton owns those properties and can afford to put some kind of shelter, some kind of canopy, some kind Shelter from the elements giving these horses the minimum standard of care and it needs to be made law I don't have time to go out and get petitions signed So I'm wondering if this can be put on a ballot for the public took to vote on For hemp for animal rights So anyway, going around and around. Lee Heller was on board with me originally and she's kind of fallen to the wayside and I'm here as a voice for these horses crying for help. Please help them.
2:18 – 2:204 turns
We will now go to Sherry Foster who is our final speaker in general public comment. Sherry? Is Sherry still here? Oh my apologies she is on Zoom We will go to Zoom with Sherry Foster.
Yes, I'm Sherry Foster, Assemblyman for New California State and hearing everything today, I want to say that it is a direct result of our elections which Mr. Daly, I just want to correct you, okay? The California election code has no jurisdiction over the federal election code. This is a presidential election and you need to comply with the federal regulation. We have been testifying for months now since January over the illegal elections and these Dominion machines which cannot count The ballots in one day and give us a fair and free election is illegal.
We have the evidence, and you need to comply to the federal regulations. And I also wanted to say that as far as all the industry leaders that are speaking today, especially for the animal rights, there is Return to Freedom Wild Horse Sanctuary that has advocacy to protect horses. Please contact them They are local, they're off of Hallama Road and also New California State has been very instrumental with our industry leaders.
By holding business summits throughout the state, you can go to newcaliforniastate.com and you'll find all the results. I mean all the information you need for our meetings and it is very apparent that we need to schedule one here in Santa Barbara County. Because obviously this board has failed and when you have Mike Stoker speaking, we need fiduciary accountability. It all starts with our elections. Thank you and have a good day.
And that concludes general public comment for today.
Okay thank you very much to all those who came and spoke and those on Zoom. All right so it is quarter to 12 and we are ready for item number one Madam Clerk, can you please read it in?
2:20 – 2:2710 turns
Chair Lavinino and members of the Board. Departmental item number one is from the Treasurer Tax Collector Public Administrator. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara issuance of tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue obligations for the benefits of Patterson Point Apartments.
Hey, I just got off the Board of Supervisors and it was explosive
today. Sherry? I think okay you got her all right.
All right Mr. Hagan. Okay good morning Chair Lavanino members of the board The item before you today is a TEFRA hearing for the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara. This is a project that you previously heard back in June of 23, but because the time had elapsed before the closure of the bond deal It's required under Internal Revenue Code 147 F that a public hearing has to be reheld. And this project is for the Patterson Point Project.
in the unincorporated area of Eastern Goleta. And because that project is within your jurisdictional boundaries, you are the body hearing this. I'm joined by Frank Thompson on my right here representing the Housing Authority and he's here to answer any questions. This item was heard by the Debt Advisory Committee last month, and it was recommended to hold the TEFRA hearing for you.
And I always like to point out whenever we do a TEFRA hearing that the county is under no obligation either legal or moral for the repayment of this debt. The repayment of this debt will come from the borrower which is Patterson Point Limited Partnership. And Frank's here to answer any questions.
Does anybody have any questions from the Board? Supervisor Nelson.
So this was here before us, since then the budget has gone up quite a bit. What was the number before and what is it now on the budget for this project?
The budget the first time that we appeared on the TEFRA hearing was approximately $12 million and the budget now is $23,700,000.
Okay, thank you Mr. Thompson and so you know these TEPRA hearings are always a little tricky because we're always trying to figure out what is our role here in this and I've always wanted to shy away from using this as a hearing on that specific project. You know I've got some controversial ones in my district as well and we don't want to use TEPRA hearings as the validity of whether that project should go there or not. Some of them had different permitting pathways that may include us or may exclude us, but the TEFR hearing is really a public hearing on whether it's fiscally sound for us to use taxes and bonds for these projects in a public way.
And I think $1 million a unit for a studio Thank you. A lot of the bids in this process, and I just think that there are many out there in the public that are taking advantage of the government since there's so much money available made for these things. And I really think it's a fleecing to the taxpayers. I think it is unconscionable that we're going to spend $1 million for a studio apartment. I know there's a need. I know we have a huge need. But at some point, what's too much? It was half a million dollars for a studio. Now it's 1 million. Next time it will be 2 million. Where does this end?
And so as my role as a fiduciary, because we have this hearing before us, I don't think I can support $1 million for a studio unit. So I've never voted against the TAFRA hearing but I do think this is probably the first time that I will.
Mr. Thompson, you want to respond to that at all?
Yeah, I would. Representing the Housing Authority they have a professional staff of people that do bid these projects and do a good job of it. There are a number of items that probably drove up the cost of this project substantially and one of them was there are because we have substantial funds from the state involved two-state programs No Place Like Home and Housing for a Healthy California, we faced deadlines in which to bid the project and to perform. So it didn't permit us really the time to go back and work closely with all of the subcontractors then to see if we could get a substantially better bid so I think that was a factor.
And the other one is we are observing a significant increase in government-financed housing development costs across the region. I mean, that's not an excuse here. I think the County Housing Authority takes its responsibility to get the best price they can But given the balance of needing to go or lose substantial resources on the order of about $19 million, or try to get a lower price they decided to move forward. The project has been underwritten by conventional construction lender and permanent lender that's Bank of California.
It's been underwritten by different levels of government, so the Housing Authority is confident that the bonds will be repaid on time and the project will be well operated in spite of being very expensive. Thank you.
2:27 – 2:4611 turns
All right. Madam Clerk, are there any public comments on this matter?
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board, we have no request to speak from the public on this item.
Is it at the discretion of the Board?
I'll move to approve staff report. Staff recommendation on, let's see if I get the language correct?
A, B and C.
A,B and C. Thanks.
Second. Item has been moved and seconded. Roll call please.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 moved and seconded. Roll call
Show transcript
Motion passes 4-1
Thank you. And departmental item number two has been withdrawn, continued to the October 1st meeting. So we are now moving on to departmental item number three. Madam Clerk?
Chair Lavanino and members of the board, departmental item number three is from the Community Services Department. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the Commission for Women annual report.
Hello. Thank you for having me. I'm very excited to talk to you all about what the Women's Commission has been up to this past year. My name is Jordi Scully, and I was the chair of the Women's Commission in 2023 to just recently. I am just going to take a couple minutes maybe a little more to tell you kind of what we've been up to and yeah so thank you for having me.
Okay so just a quick agenda. I'm going to give short background on the Women's Commission, talk a little bit about the commissioners, talk about our collaboration outreach, the women in leadership work that we've been doing and then talk about our commission refresh that Ivan and the commissioners have been working on and our upcoming goals. As a volunteer, I have to say I had time to make the presentation but I didn't have time to write jokes which I am very sad about. So sorry in advance. Our mission at the Santa Barbara Commission for Women is to promote equitable and equal status and well-being for women across the gender spectrum in Santa Barbara County.
We work most mostly to collaborate with other agencies, develop facilitate recognize and recommend programs increase women in leadership throughout Santa Barbara County gather and disseminate information conduct public meetings and advise the Board of Supervisors. Sorry next slide So for our countywide program development and activities, I'm just going to tell you a little bit about some of the programs that we've been working on this year.
And our standing committees are Women in Leadership, Outreach and Advocacy Policy, and Communications. And then I'm gonna give a little preview of what we're gonna do in 2024 and 2025. Next slide. So the commission's goals for this past year were to increase women in leadership across Santa Barbara County. That's both within the commissions and then through jobs that maybe would traditionally not have women serving, and we also support and uplift countywide outreach initiatives through various events and town halls, educate on policy affecting our local communities, and then explore the most effective ways to communicate with the community.
Next slide. And then I had some separate goals as the chair, and I just kind of wanted to make the commission more accessible and prominent in the community. A lot of folks say like what is the Commission for Women? And I didn't like that So I wanted more people to know about us, and then fill vacancies and maintain a full commission. I do want to thank all of you for quickly filling vacancies on the commission and keeping a full commission for us.
And I have been working to engage commissioners so that they want to stick around. And also work to diversify the commission in the activities that we do, disseminate equal funding through the district. So the budget is now allocates equal funding to all the districts And then update the mission, vision, materials, bylaws, kind of the like boring cleanup stuff. So that's what I've been working on.
Now I'm just going to talk a little bit about our current commissioners. So first and foremost we're Women's Commissioners for the County of Santa Barbara and then we also do other things in the community. I am a First District Commissioner and my day job is as the Policy Advisor to Senator Limon. Then we have Jamie Collins who is the Executive Director of Girls Inc., and then we have Raquel Zick who's also here today, thanks for coming.
And she's the PIO for the County of Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office. District 2, we have Ingrid Bostrom. I always struggle to say your name. She's here and she is a photographer for her regular job. We're so happy to have her and I have to give her credit for most of the photos on the slides. She has also helped with outreach a lot with some beautiful photos. So thank you for being here.
Then we have Joanne Meade-Young, who is a retired principal. And we have Dr. Jacqueline Reed who runs the Women Leadership Program at Antioch University. Next slide. District 3, we have Felicia Luong Boyd. She is a Director of Financial Services and Accountant. She's very passionate about getting women involved in financial decisions. Then we have Angie Swanson Kiriakou who does outreach and membership coordination for the Unitarian Society. And then we have Gretchen Grenier, who I think is our first ever high school commissioner so I'm so grateful for her being appointed because she's first of all very excited and she works very hard and second of all it's just fun to get the young perspective on the board so thank you for that.
District 4, we have JoJo Murdoch who runs Awakening Giants in North County. Then we have Jennifer Baird who runs Hearts of Armor in North County and Suzanne Levy who is a trustee for Allan Hancock College. District 5 next slide Finally, we have Allison Wales who she is the North County Rape Crisis Associative Director. And then we have Yvette Peralta, the Director of Annual Programs at Future Leaders of America and last but not least Tracy Beard who is the CEO of the Solvang Chamber of Commerce. So as you can see, we have a really full board, large board and it's diverse. I think one trend that I saw with what everyone likes about the commission is just being able to hear perspectives from other women that maybe you wouldn't spend time with generally and then all working towards the same goal of equity for women in Santa Barbara County.
I think all of us find that to be very fulfilling on the commission so I really appreciate all of the appointments. It's been great. So next I'm going to talk a little bit about collaboration and outreach. This is a photo from the North County Women Who Lead event. We've started a North County and South County women who lead event as a goal to kind of bring leadership opportunities to young women and folks to come who maybe have years of leadership experience, and get them together to kind of encourage and foster more leadership through Santa Barbara County. So this is a very successful North County event.
Next slide. Other collaboration outreach, we've worked with different organizations either by sponsorship or attending their events. These are just a few of the organizations that we sponsored this year and we hope to even add more next year. And I'm just going to highlight one which is LEAP so that will be next slide. So I think you all actually gave a resolution to LEAP this morning so you know about it.
sponsorships this year. As you all know, they're the only diaper bank in Santa Barbara County and are utilized by North and South County but based out of South County. They distribute over 5,000 diapers each month to babies in need. And we kind of wanted to use our limited budget highlight this issue and bring maybe more donations for Diaper Awareness Week to LEAP. So that's kind of some of the work that we're doing. We're doing a check presentation type of thing on September 23rd at LEAP, and so I'm going to send an invite to you all and your staff. And I would be so grateful if you could attend and just see kind of what the Women's Commission, LEAP are doing for the county. So I'll be sending that after the presentation.
Next slide. On women in leadership, I found that that's probably one of the most exciting topics for everyone on the commission. We highlight women leaders throughout the county with the annual service awards. You all know that because you give us the awards and then we have our Women Who Lead events which I was discussing and then we're working to diversify boards and commissions were hoping to do some research next year to work on that. And then this year we were actually able to sponsor Commissioner Grenier, the high school commissioner that we have to go to the national conference in Boston and she said it was really fulfilling. She got to sit on a small panel and talk about being a high school women's commissioner so it is very cool to be at a national conference from Santa Barbara you know.
We are showing up. In addition to that Commissioner Beard works a lot on representing who is also here today She works a lot on representing equal pay issues statewide. And so she was invited by First Partner Newsome to go to a women's equal pay event in what I guess is Sacramento, yes? Okay. So we are getting out there statewide and across the country. Next slide.
Another thing I'd like to highlight is the veteran stand down which the commission has been working on for 13 years with Chair Lavinino. This is really exciting work and I just want to highlight that you might have heard this but the Women's Commission She raised her hand group, which was funded by the Women's Commission originally received a national women's commission award for their work. They're the first kind of group to support only women veterans in the county And that was all a result of some funding from the Commission for Women. So it's really nice to kind of see years on what this funding can do and support, I think the support for women veterans is a lot of times not there. And so this is great to see the work being done. So thank you for that.
Next slide. This is the annual service awards where we were honoring women in leadership. These are the five women we honored this year. We were all there in Santa Maria and it was really exciting to see, we got a little news coverage for that so that was exciting and we're looking forward to honoring another five women or five organizations that support women in the next year.
Next slide. So for the refresh, I kind of wanted to update the mission and the vision. For brevity, inclusivity, accessibility, I think commissions can be a bit dry and governmenty And I work for the government and I love it, but I want to bring people who maybe aren't traditionally drawn to government work to the commission. So we kind of worked on a rebrand. This is our new logo which we have in Spanish and English.
Me and Commissioner Bostrom worked on this. Commissioner Bostrom hand drew this logo, so we're really grateful for that. We added our established date which is 1973. That's a very long time for a commission to go strong so we're really proud of that and I Quite literally forced her to put a California poppy in there because it's local to Santa Barbara County, and it stands for peace and strength. And we're just happy to have this new logo for the Women's Commission. I also have stickers, women, new stickers for you guys.
So we're also working to translate all of our materials into Spanish, to work on that inclusivity. Get some QR codes so that people can easily access us and editing the website which is like no fun but Angie Swanson Cariaco has been working hard on along with Eva and we got our logo approved in the last meeting. So communications I think is important to the commission and it's something that we've been working a lot on this year.
We're kind of bringing it to social media, once again it's hard to bring governmenty things to social media but it's been working well and our high school women's commissioner is our chair of the communications committee. So it's really exciting to see her work on this and be able to put it on our college applications, but also benefit the commission and the county a lot for her work. And then we're working to increase relationships with the news and get some news coverage so that we can get information that women need out and have a good audience to share it with.
Okay next slide. So these are our goals for the 2024-2025 year. This is a photo from the Women Who Lead in South County and I did want to thank Supervisor Williams, Supervisor Katz and Supervisor Hartman not pictured but there at the Women Who Lead event in South County we had a really good turnout I think between both events we probably got 150 people so we were really happy with our first event and there will be another one coming up this year. So, I hope you all can join again.
Next slide. So our goals for 2024-2025 are really to focus on women in leadership. And what we want to do to support that is to first kind of collect the data, do a good research of what we're working with before we kind of create a plan to implement increasing women in leadership. So that's one of our goals. I know that there are past staff member of supervisor I think, or Supervisor Williams had some data on commission service for the county. And so we kind of want to expand that or update it and then kind of use that information to guide our outreach and advocacy and uplift and support women in Santa Barbara County with And we are also supporting the Women's Legacy event which they had last year, which kind of inspired our event for women who lead.
It was like talking about the legacy of women in Santa Barbara County and service on commissions and it kind of made us think like we love We love celebrating the women's legacy and all the work that has been done these past years in the county, but we also want to inspire young leaders with those stories. So that is kind of, we took inspiration from a Women Legacy event and our event to kind of make that and it has worked out well. It is exciting.
And then for the policy, we're hoping to continue to advise the Board of Supervisors on statewide legislation and create a recommendation sheet for the Board of Supervisors. So next year you should be expecting that so we are excited to kind of create like a one-sheet for all the work that we've been doing and give those recommendations. And then finally, we're working to expand social media.
You know mailing lists are great but I just think social media is, I mean maybe this is my generation but it's just easier to share and look at and it's more fun to read so we're kind of working on that to put good information out for women in the county. And then like I said just kind of getting news involved so that we can also share important things. Next slide. Yeah, so the incoming co-chairs who were voted on in the last meeting are JoJo Murdock and Angie Swanson Carriaco.
We're really excited to have them and they're excited to do it, so they'll be up here with the next presentation. And they're from different parts of the county, so it should be a good collaboration. Finally, I just want to thank you all for your ongoing support. You know we got extended funding last year and we really did our best to put that to work and I hope that you all saw it in the county and we are forever grateful for all the funding and I also just want to thank Eva and Jesus for their support for the commission I know that we contact everyone a lot, but we're all excited and we work really hard. So we appreciate all the support from the county. Thank you so much.
2:46 – 2:5212 turns
Excellent.
Supervisor Williams? Well, not that I'm biased at all but I just want to tell you Ms. Scully that I feel like you've done a great job in communicating effectively the relevance importance of the commission and the activities of the Commission really appreciate your service.
Supervisor Kaps?
I'll try to be brief. I have a lot to say about this commission that I used to be the chair of and served with Gina Fisher and Suzanne Peck and Tracy Beard, so we all stay in the fold here. And I learned a ton about the county in different ways, participated in our chairs, veterans stand down, learned a lot. So keep going is what I want to say because you're on fire. It's clear. You're doing so much. That event here in Santa Barbara was remarkable for how many new Women, younger women, professionals were there. I talked to people that I'd never seen at events before which says a lot when you go to an event and most of the people there are not familiar faces so amazing job that takes. And literally I asked one woman how did you get here? Oh Geordie out of the blue I didn't know her but she messaged me on LinkedIn it's like no surprise there so keep going.
And I'm gonna be a little bit somber because we have a lot of work to do. I would like to meet with at least my commissioners about a new report out of the California Budget and Policy Center. I'm not going to go too far into it, but it's a women's well-being index that was based on the state Women's Commission criteria and I know that doesn't reflect the commitment of so many leaders in this room, our commission. But we have a lot of work to do to bring women in To empower them to find out how we break through these challenges like food insecurity, which we rank very high towards the bottom of the counties when it comes to women. We've kind of talked about this like health care, like poverty. I mean, it's goes on and on. So the next step for me is to meet with at least my commissioners, perhaps the whole board to talk about how all of the activities can align with these this index, which again came straight from The statewide commission which I know our first partner is a big champion of as well as our state Senator Lamone.
So, I'll stop with that but my hat's off to all of you thanks for being here and thanks for the work especially coming off of the pandemic where meeting was hard and you can tell that you have a renewed sense of commitment and energy around us. Thanks.
Thank You Supervisor Nelson
Yes, thank you Chair Labadino and I just wanted to thank the whole entire commission but then my commissioners. Wanted to make sure I recognized them and really excited about JoJo getting a chance to be a fourth district from the fourth district could be a chair you know the co-chair next year in I just really also want to thank Supervisor Hartman for having a youth member on there. I think that's a nice challenge for all of us.
I know Gretchen actually is one of my niece's best friends, so it's neat to see her out there serving in leadership. She's an impressive young woman and I'm sure you guys are lucky to have her and she's lucky to be a part of that. Really where it starts, when some of these kids can get a passion and a fire for what we do up here which is often pretty darn boring for most people in the public. But when they get to actually see how it impacts people's lives and a world where people are looking for purpose you guys are able to help direct advocacy in that direction. And I really just appreciate that admire all you for that and wish y'all continued success.
Supervisor Hartman?
Well over the years that I've served up here, the Women's Commission has been the most dynamic and I really appreciate you coming back. It changes year to year but one thing that seems to be constant is I think of Suzanne Peck and Tracy Beard who have over the years stayed connected even when they're still not on the commission but they really share the goals that you are trying to achieve And having that breadth of knowledge and then, again, communicating that to younger people and having that generational discourse I think is really invaluable for our county.
I'm excited about the focus on leadership. I think that's really fabulous, although I hadn't heard about the report that Supervisor Capps raised and that really seems like a good focus for your energies as well. Thank you.
And I want to also give a shout out. You know, I'm not as excited about the high school appointment because I think I had the record for the youngest commissioner in Yvette before this last one but I'll try to find somebody in junior high or something, I guess. But I just wanted to point out so I do want to give a shout out to Yvette and Allison and to Tracy.
Tracy, I think out of all my commissioners is probably Well, she communicates with me the most. I'm gonna stumble over that word but it's for good reason because as you said, I think this commission is one that does a lot of the heavy lifting. But she brought me back from the National Association of Commissions for Women, the Achievement Award for Santa Barbara County's Commission for the work that was done and she raised her hand initiative.
And for those of you who don't know, Really a, it's kind of life changing for women when they come back after serving that a lot of them don't. They don't want, it's not that they don't wanna identify as a veteran but they don't even feel like, that they feel a little bit less than a guy that served somehow and this initiative is really great about lifting them back up and saying you did your job. You raised your hand, you did what it took And so I really appreciate that focus and looking forward to what you're going to do next year. Sounds great.
All right, is there any public comment on this?
Chair Lavinino and members of the board we have two requests to speak from the
public. Oh okay sounds good.
We are going to remain here in Santa Barbara and begin with Suzanne Peck to be followed by Tracy Baird.
2:52 – 2:596 turns
Well, I was going to start with good morning. I guess it's good afternoon. But I'm really happy to be here and so happy to hear all the good work that the commission is doing now. So I was on the commission for eight and a half years. I was very proud to represent the second district. And I'm excited to see that there's a full house now and that they're doing wonderful work. So congratulations to you for appointing them and to all the wonderful commissioners doing their work. So I'm here also representing another group called the Women's Legacy and Leaders Collective. The Women's Legacy and Leaders Collective is Honorable Susan Rose, former Board of Supervisors Second District, Dr. Anna Everett who also served with me on the Women's Commission, Liz Martinez who also worked for the county, and myself.
And we had this event that Commissioner Scully told you about and Commissioner Kaps and Commissioner Hartman, I'm sorry Supervisor Kaps and Supervisor Hartman that you attended with us. We were thrilled with that. We had more than 100 people here in the county building And it was a great inspiration, especially to honor the legacy of the women leaders who we have in this county. But even more so to inspire the next generation of women leaders. So we're back. We're doing a follow-up event next month and some of you know about it. We've sent information to you and your staff What we're trying to do with this next event, the Legacy and Leaders event is to have a dialogue with all the women in the county who have served on boards and commissions.
Not just the Women's Commission. To look at how we can use our voices to bring on the next generation to do more good work in the county. So the event itself, the goal is get more women into the political pipeline, elevate them create positive change in the county. We sent to each of your staff people a list that we were able to get from the County Clerk, of all women who've been commissioners whether it was Fish and Wildlife or any other commissions over the past 10 years. The clerk cannot give us the contact information to reach out to them so we're asking you to do the invitation So I think a couple of the districts have already sent out invitations. If you haven't already done so, we can help but it needs to come from you, the invitation and I think you have a hard copy of it now in front of you.
Did they pass them out? So it's this event October 9th. It'll be at the home of Susan Rose. It will be in the evening Again, we're hoping to have all women commissioners who've served over the past 10 years to have important discussions about what else we can do to move things forward in our county. So save the date. We also have a website legacyandleaders.com and we're always sharing new information and ideas. And again it was an honor to serve on the Women's Commission Those of us who are alumna from the Women's Commission, we're still here. We still want to make a difference. So we appreciate your support. Appreciate having a full house on the excellent women's commission that serves now and we hope you'll help us outreach for October 9th.
Thank you. We will now go to Tracy Baird. Tracy?
Thank you all. It's a pleasure to serve every one of the five of you as a Women Commissioner for the last 12 years. It is amazing that we are moving towards a younger generation, 40 and under. It is very exciting that our commission has pivoted when other ones are over 65 so that's extremely exciting to us. We now need to have a wall. This is our third award in 5 years that we have received on a national level So I asked you five years ago that we needed an award for the people that we honor as Slow County does. We need to have in North and South County, I think there's more to come for the Women's Commission. And we honor five women each year. We need to have a space for them so people can see just not on a website.
I'm excited that we represent Steve Lavinino, our group does. And we with financial literacy are working forward with him, Alan Hancock on International Women's Day for the 8th for our 5th district to show that women need to have financial literacy education and it is for the young and the old and it will serve for everyone. And that will be on International Women's Day at Allan Hancock. And it's a privilege to work with all of you from Carpinteria to Guadalupe and Jordi has done an excellent job, and I want to say thank you to our team everyone we just as all we all don't agree but we all agree to make sure that women have equity in this community is equity for all so thank you.
And that concludes public
comment on this item.
All right. Thank you so much. I think this is a receiving file, so we have recommendations A and B though. So if somebody wants to make that.
So moved. Second.
Moved and seconded all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Thank you very much from every board member. We really appreciate it Okay, so Chris is trying to sneak up there before we go to lunch. I saw that. That was a smooth move. Okay. Question to the board too. Do you want to hear this? I know we're going to hear this item but do they want to break for lunch after this one or do you want to keep going? What would you like to do? We do have 145 minute one and a 20-minute one after this. So yeah why don't we break after this? What's that?
Okay. They don't need to eat. Let's go ahead and read this one in.
2:59 – 3:0613 turns
Chair Lavanino, members of the board, departmental item number four is from the Public Works Department it is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the adoption of an ordinance establishing and updating fees for services provided by the Public Works Department in connection with encroachment permits in accordance with government code section 54985
Mr. Sneddon. Chair Lavagnino, members of the board I'm going to turn it over to Gary Smart our traffic engineer for a brief presentation
Thank You Chris chair members of the board I'll be presenting some fee additions to our fee schedule for encroachment permits we're adding four existing fees to the fee schedule and one new fee to the fee schedule The existing fees pertain to special events, outdoor business permits and shared mobility. And the new fee is for the parklets having use of the parking area and paying a one-time fee of $5,000 for that.
These are the recommended actions and I'm available for questions.
Supervisor Nielsen?
Yes thank you Chair Lavagnino. The parklet fee for the $5,000 a special review. That's so we're going to is that for existing ones already exist or is that for future parklets? Because I you know I'm kind of confused if that would be retroactive or if that's a proactive fee.
Supervisor Nelson through the board chairman. That would be both it's a new fee that we will collect for existing ones and any future ones
So we're going to collect fees for work that we already did? Because I originally thought this $5,000 was going to be a fee that was going to pay for other you know it's an offsetting thing where that you're taking away public right-of-way so we're gonna take this money as kind of a you were paying so that we could create additional parking. To me this sounds like we're charging people for work that we're doing so it's a fee recovery.
Well the five thousand dollar fee is for the loss of parking
So we're gonna, and here it's for services. It's a fee recovery for services of public works staff. And so that's why I'm trying to marry those two things. I support them paying for that so that we can go build other parking since they're taking that away. I don't support it because especially if we're doing it retroactively for work that we've already done, you know, I don't think we can do that actually. So I'm trying to clarify that.
Supervisor Nielsen to the chair. It is specifically for what you stated, which is offset parking and creating parking elsewhere that and that is reflected in the board item that came before you just for this ordinance and it's in the table.
Okay. I'm fine with that if it's offset to create new parking, great. Totally support that. I can justify that. If it's a fee for cost recovery for our staff time, I could do that proactively. I just can't do that reactively so I can support that. You're bringing back all of these. Essentially, we're going to adopt this all again and we adopted these originally back in June of last year and when you read these sometimes you don't think about how they are actually applied but since this is back before us on our agenda I was looking at some of these and I am somewhat troubled that some of the fees that we charge people is we charge people a fee to fix our stuff so if you fix your sidewalk in front of your house A fee there if you trim the tree out in a right away, we're going to charge you there.
And so You know, it sounds like a disincentive, you know? Especially when we don't maintain our stuff. We recently had something in Orchard where our county didn't do the right away, maintain the right of way. We had somebody actually begin to clean it up and then we went and cited them for not getting a permit to work on the right-of-way. And so it's this really perverse relationship there where we're actually been fined him for cleaning up stuff that we don' do ourselves. So can you help me with how we fix that because I think that doesn't sound right. You know, when we have people willing to go and improve our right-of-way that then we charge them to do that just doesn't seem congruent with the goals of what we should be doing in government.
Supervisor Nelson through the chair. Yes, that's a good point. The fee study if you recall was done as a reflection of policy and I think direction through the KPMG process for full cost recovery and those are the costs we do have to go out and make sure that they're doing traffic control that the work is being done safely at the work is following county standards We do have programs and processes to partner with people where the homeowners contribute some in the county does the work and or contribute some to the process too.
There isn't really a mechanism for Because we're full cost recovery and we do have to do the inspection, there isn't really a mechanism right now for reflecting the fact that they may be doing improvements the right away.
So I don't know how we get this. Maybe this is a question of the CEO if that's the policy, the board is full cost recovery because what we are, we've done is created disincentives for people to do things to improve our right-of-way by charging them to do that and so I understand the point of the KPMG and I understand the point of cost recovery But when we set up a system that we charge people for doing the right thing or helping us, it's a disincentive so why would anybody do that? Unfortunately what happens is people go okay then I won't get that permit. I'll just go do it anyway and then they risk getting caught and then I think when you get caught for not getting permit then you double the fine. A lot of this work now gets done at evenings or the weekends to try to avoid the county inspector.
So again it sets up not really good governance. So I would love for there to be an opportunity in the future for the Public Works Department to be able to recognize, you know hey this is something that helps everybody so why would we charge you for that? You know if you're actually taking stuff of our potential our backlog right or maybe we can start to pay people when they do that too. Maybe that's something we can look at where we could take some of our capital dollars and pay the public when they did they do our job for us
3:06 – 3:1014 turns
Supervisor Nielsen, through the Chair. We can look into that. It isn't super common that there are frontage improvements that are being done specifically for that. Like it's generally replacing driveways or something they're doing as improving their access but there are probably some cases where the public is recognizing benefit as well.
So do you have the ability as the Road Commissioner to waive some of those fees when those circumstances arise? Because I think that might be the right answer, is making sure there's that flexibility for somebody to go yeah, that's not right. We shouldn't be charging somebody to do something and I think actually it happens a lot more often than you realize but I think it happens again outside the hours of operations so that people can avoid having to be part of our permit system.
Supervisor Nelson through the chair, I think we can look into that. I would recommend doing that as part of the next year's fee. So if we go through... We just went through this huge exercise to update all the permit fees and will be adjusting them based on how it progresses throughout the year in terms of cost recovery, in terms of costs actually do the work And then I would recommend at the end of this fiscal year, we could bring that back as we look at adjusting our fees anyway and if there's other opportunities within that to account for public improvement of permits. Yeah,
I think that would be a good idea. I think that would be well appreciated by those in the public as well as it might incentivize people from doing the right thing instead of disincentivizing them from doing the wrong thing.
Madam Clerk, any public comment on this item?
Chair Lavanino and members of the Board we have no request to speak from the public on this item.
Okay I just have a question about the when we were talking about the parking space the $5,000 how are we gonna manage that I mean this just goes into a kitty does it stay in that particular region I'm thinking of just like Old Town Orchid Do all the $5,000 ones stay in Orchid and we buy a place there or is it countywide? How's it gonna be managed?
Chair Lavagnino yes. The fees are intended to stay within the area where they were generated and they're based on rough costs to create parking in those particular areas and or projects that are underway that would create additional parking in the area.
Okay cool. Go ahead. Chair Lavigne, if I could expand on that for the public that might be watching this that we're looking at increasing significant amount of parking spaces in the Old Orchard area. I think we're going to do angle parking on the south side now as well as they've done a lot to create parking along California Broadway and now along Markham as well so there's a lot of dollars being spent from Public Works already existing dollars. So I think they helped determine this fee by kind of costing that out on per parking spot basis to replace those units Okay.
Supervisor Hartman?
I'm not sure that I understood Supervisor Nelson's point, but I can't let it go unremarked that Public Works is really super about partnering with private entities, nonprofit entities and finding creative ways to deal with people when they want to help improve public infrastructure so I'm just very appreciative of that.
All right. Looks like we've talked this one out. Can I get a motion please?
Move A through C, staff recommendations.
I'll second. Seconded by Supervisor Kaps. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Okay at this point we're going to break for closed session Rachel.
3:10 – 3:217 turns
Thank you Mr. Chair, members of the board. The board is scheduled for closed session for one item conference with labor negotiators for all bargaining units underrepresented employees managers and executives and the agency designated representatives are CEO Miyasato and Human Resources Director Christine Schmidt and the time estimate is 30 minutes.
We'll be back about 110. Okay, that moves us to departmental item number five. Madam Clerk?
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, departmental item number five is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding a fiscal year 2023 through 2024 fourth quarter budget status report.
Supervisors our Budget Director Mr. Clemente is on Zoom today he's not feeling well so please give him some grace but he'll be giving the report today
Thank you, Mona. Good afternoon, Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. I do apologize for not being down there. I am just getting over a cold. So next slide please.
Well Paul we're going to let you slide because there is a positive variance okay? Okay. I would have thought you'd be sick if you were in the negative so.
You dragged me in. So today I'll be updating your board on how the county ended fiscal year 23-24 compared to the adjusted budget. Next slide please. As a reminder, we look at how each department in the general fund into the fiscal year. And if they had a variance of $300,000 or more positive or negative as compared to their budget, or if they would have closed the year with reportable negative without additional revenues, we include an explanation in the report.
Special revenue funds are required to end the year balanced so they don't typically have any reportable variances in this report. Next slide please. The general fund ended with a positive variance of just over $10 million, driven mostly by general revenues at over $6 million and a variety of other departments with positive balances. Partially offset by CSD and P&E ending with negative balances.
Additionally the sheriff which had been projecting an almost one million dollar negative variance at the end of quarter three ended the year balanced. I'll touch on all of these departments in the upcoming slides. Next slide please. So General Revenues is the department where all the general funds discretionary revenue is recorded and includes property taxes, TOT, sales tax and more.
It ended this fiscal year with a $6.3 million surplus for just under 2% of budget mostly driven by interest income coming in 4.6 million dollars higher than budgeted due to the higher interest rate environment in recent years Other significant drivers include holding back some general fund contribution from social services due to higher than anticipated state revenue received during the year, as well as sales tax, franchise fees and property transfer taxes coming in slightly over budget. These increases are being partially offset by property taxes which came in under budget by $1.3 million.
cannabis tax revenues came in 1.7 million dollars under budget for just under six million dollars on a budget of 7.5 million dollars mostly due to retail revenue coming in lower than budgeted that shortfall reduces cannabis tax fund balance held in general county programs and does not impact the overall general revenues positive variance next slide please We have four operating departments that ended with positive reportable variances, including probation at $2.2 million, treasurer tax collector at 944,000, public works at 451,000 and auditor at 316,000. The majority of these variances were driven by salary savings as well as higher than budgeted revenues in treasurer and auditor and lower services and supplies costs in public works.
Next slide please. The Sheriff's Department was projecting an almost $1 million deficit during our third quarter report, driven by overtime as well as increased pharmaceutical costs in the jails. However, in the final months of the fiscal year a variety of unanticipated revenue sources were received including the disbursement of opioid settlement funds towards the medically assisted treatment program costs at the jails, state grants that reimbursed some custody staff costs related to jail-based competency treatment And the release of previously approved ARPA funds that hadn't been built into the Sheriff's budget.
Additionally, because of the extended negotiations that occurred with WellPath in the spring on the one-year contract extension The annual cost escalation occurred on July 1st, instead of April 1st as had been assumed in the budget which created some cost savings. Although this meant that the Sheriff's altogether sorry, this meant that the Sheriff's Department ended the year with $31,000 positive variance and we did not have to tap into the $2 million Prop 172 set aside that we hold in general county programs to balance the sheriff at year end.
Next slide please. Public Health Animal Services, I'm just mentioning briefly here because at quarter three they were projecting an almost $400,000 deficit which we had discussed as being driven by decreased licensing revenue and increased costs of food and pharmaceuticals. They closed that gap at year end with releases of fund balance as well as higher donations than anticipated and some savings in other services and supplies areas. The licensing revenue in particular is something that we will be closely watching this fiscal year CSD parks had been projecting a $600,000 negative variance in our quarter 3 report which ended up being just about half of that ultimately ending the year with a $332,000 negative variance.
As we discussed at quarter three, a big driver of the deficit was the delay in opening the restaurant at Goleta Beach as well as impacts from the winter storms on camping revenues. The projected deficit was defrayed a bit by higher than anticipated revenues from the restaurants at Arroyo Borough and Kachuma as well as greater salary savings than projected during quarter three.
Also not reflected in these numbers, we just learned in the past couple of weeks that business interruption insurance of $139,000 will be paid out for some lost camping revenue and that will come back into the general fund. Next slide please. Finally, the long-range planning division of planning and development which is a unit within the general fund ended the year with a $285,000 negative variance.
This was driven primarily by over budgeting of certain revenues particularly grants that ultimately did not materialize. The department was also not tracking staff time and contract costs close enough to make sure that the work being performed on particular projects was tied to a defined revenue source As these issues became apparent during the fiscal year-end close process, the department worked to establish internal procedures going forward that will improve communication between their fiscal staff and their program staff and to better monitor project expenses and track them by funding source. They're also working with our office to reanalyze the current year long range planning budget to identify whether there are any ongoing structural issues that need to be addressed.
Next slide please. This chart shows our adopted FTE by department in the blue line with smallest departments on the left and the largest on the right. Underneath that, we've got bars for each quarter's vacant funded positions by department. Orange is Q1, green is Q2, yellow is Q3 and the blue bar is quarter four. At the end of the fiscal year, June 30, 592 or 13% of the county's 4,644 adopted funded positions were vacant. This is a similar vacancy rate to quarters two and three and slightly lower than quarter one which was around 15%.
Although the 2% reduction between quarters one and four doesn't sound like very much, it does represent about 100 more field positions than we had at the beginning of the year. So that's a good step that we hope is maintained and improved on in the coming quarters. Departments with the highest Q4 vacancy rates include CEO at 19%, clerk or quarter assessor at 19% and information technology at 18%.
All three of these departments have reported more recent successes filling vacancies, which should be reflected in next quarter's update barring other departures. And vacancies in many other departments are historically difficult to fill positions often requiring highly technical or specialized skills. And I'll point out on a positive note, the auditor controller's office which had an average vacancy rate around 21% during the first three quarters of the year did manage to bring that down to 7% in the fourth quarter through focused effort between them and human resources.
Next slide please. As your board knows, we used previous year's general fund surplus as the source of our one-time funds in the upcoming budget cycle. We've listed some of the likely uses for those funds here including new capital and deferred maintenance projects, increased costs of existing projects, continued implementation costs on the ERP system and implementation costs of countywide plans such as a Climate Action Plan and Recreation Master Plan. And we'll discuss these more as we get into Next slide.
That concludes my report. Recommended actions are on the screens to receive and file and make the CEQA determination.
3:21 – 3:2914 turns
Questions from the board? Madam Clerk, any public comment on this matter?
Chair Lavanino, members of the Board we have no request to speak from
the public. Supervisor Caps?
Yeah, thank you. I appreciate whether shortfalls in the budget update that there is sort of a plan discussed about how to recoup that and specifically my first question is to our CEO about unfilled positions freezing or eliminating them just if you could elaborate a bit more on the how that would be prioritized and your thoughts on
Supervisors to the Chair, so because of the as we look in the budget planning for next year and looking at when our future deficits may occur my office will be working with departments to see of the funded vacant positions what's really necessary. And we're just warning departments we may start looking at eliminating or freezing them depending on the workload and needs it'll be timed with when we start doing the five-year forecast on projected deficits
Thank you. And I noticed, you know, other things like at Goleta Beach the restaurant we're doing what we can to get that open. I did have a question on the cannabis shortfall that continues quarter after quarter. I don't quite see that same spirit of this is what we're doing to fix it. I know we tried laboriously to look at our tax program and we've tightened up tax enforcement, but my question is really about the dispensaries. It seems as though that's been identified as the reason for the continued shortfall and either now or at the cannabis update I would like to understand a bit more about what we can do to get dispensaries that have been given this—I think it was a lottery system that you all did? A permit. You know they've just been holding on to them.
I have a lot of concern The effect on the rest of the program, the rest of the budget if those operators have yet to really come to reality. So I know especially in my district there's at least one and so I just am offering my assistance if I can help sort of break whatever holds there are on the process.
Thank you. That's correct. Thank you, Supervisor Caps through the chair. Brittany Oderman, Deputy CEO. I can speak to that a little bit. I think this has come up during some of our other quarterly reports. I think Supervisor Nelson had a similar question and so we've been really working closely our cannabis team with the applicants. They are all currently in the building process. So Well, in the planning and development process. Most of them are in the building process. And so it's really a matter of construction and getting things underway.
And so I think the one in your supervisor caps in your district specifically is currently under construction. They have pulled their building permits. So once they pull their building permits, their permit is vested. And we won't really work with them in our office until They go for their final inspections on the business license side. But I think the questions that you all have been asking have really kind of motivated these applicants to keep things moving as we reported before, the industry was slowing down a bit and so I think people were slowing They weren't as eager to get open, but things are leveling out and so we are working closely with them and we can give a more detailed update when we come back in October.
But we are aware that that is an issue I will say that the revenues on the retail side I think You know, we make these projections pretty early on. And so this particular shortfall that you're seeing, that prediction was made when we thought many were going to be open, when we thought the sales were gonna be much higher. We have two open, their revenues are coming in lower than we anticipated and so we've corrected course. So we're gonna continue to have revenues from those retail operations but they're gonna be at a lower level than we originally anticipated.
Okay, thank you. Again I do feel a responsibility then when we see a shortfall especially in the cannabis program sort of quarter after quarter that we really be as creative as we can okay how can we fill that gap? How can we bring back the levels I know we all want and in this area I just ask you to look at and I'm sure you are if there's applicants that haven't started construction yet is it time to take What's the right terminology? Is it a permit for the retailers?
Thank you, Supervisor Caps. I think we have some limitations when they've been issued a permit and we don't have a lot of control over how quickly they get into construction. We've impressed upon them that this was a competitive process, that there are others that were ranked in many of the community development or in the many of the community plan areas that may still be very interested in getting a chance to get into the permit process.
And so we can explore setting out some timelines. There isn't anything in Chapter 50 currently, that's the ordinance that controls the business license process. But we can look at that if that's something we need to do Currently, like I said we're working with those applicants. We're impressing upon them that they need to get things in motion and we continue to do that thanks.
And Supervisors so we do plan to come back on October 8th with the fourth quarter cannabis update and so if we can produce more information on who are the Folks, where they are in the process for all the retailers. And as Brittany said that also when you're looking at the fourth quarter report Mr. Clemente is comparing what we ended the year with what we forecasted and he has said the forecasts for the cannabis revenue he made back January, February 2023 because it was the 23-24 budget so we understand that there outdated forecasts as well. But we will bring that information back and have a conversation about how can we get these folks to take action.
And if they won't, what's our options?
Thank you. Yeah just again sort of you snooze you lose kind of I know this board has talked about that in different contexts here but I'm just interested in how we can push and what I can do to assist in that. Thank you
Supervisor Nielsen
Yes thank you Chair Labadino You know, they may be vested in a building permit but I don't think they're vested in a business license. I think that's still the purview of this board which would be the warning out there for those operators that you need both pieces to get your California state license so looking forward to that update. My question for Mr. Clemente was about the franchise fees.
The additional half million dollars and anticipated franchise fees. This is an issue that I'm somewhat Interested in and been doing some research, what was the reason or where that come from? That extra half a million dollars that we were not previously anticipating.
Supervisor Nielsen through the chair, I believe it was just that we have to estimate a number every year when we build that and it's the franchise fees are percentage of the sort of gross revenues that the utilities are making in the area. And I believe there is higher revenues that they received and paid out than we had estimated when we built this budget.
Yeah, so I can give you a number. It's about $4.1 million on a budget of about 3.6
3:29 – 3:3412 turns
Yeah, now the reason why that caught my attention is because that's a significant amount of increase that we didn't anticipate. Maybe that was because our gas bills were high for the few months there. That might have been the reason why that actually happened. Now I start to think about what was that unanticipated revenue? It's an area that I'm really interested in. Franchise fees, I think it's something that our county underutilizes and doesn't look at as closely. Our office has been diving in as a way to try to find additional revenue But I'm glad to see that some of those revenues are starting to come in.
So, that
was my other
question.
Yeah and I will say it kind of has been growing the past couple years. The receipts were about four million dollars last year on a budget of 3.2. That was back in 22-23 so we've been trying to catch up the budget where the receipts have been I think because of the things you're noting in the market like the gas prices and things like that have been driving that up.
Yeah, just for the public. I don't think we've actually audited any of these in like 15 years based on my research so I think there's an opportunity there. I know last time we audited one of these franchise it led to hundreds of thousands of dollars that was underpaid by these utilities to our county and so it's something that again our office is looking at not ready to ask staff to move in any certain direction But I do think it's something that we as a board at least need to be as good stewards, keeping an eye on. It's good to see those numbers go up. Maybe that's also because I'm asking some of those questions out there of some of these franchise payers that they may be starting to increase some of their payments. But I think that's an opportunity for us to create additional revenue that we should be receiving.
Supervisor Williams?
I just wanted to say I appreciate Supervisor Caps talking about this because I do think that one of the basic, pointed to one of the basic problems in the state in getting the regulated legal cannabis market to be stronger than the unregulated illegal Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the board. The retail is moving. I don't think it's just a fiscal one, though that should matter too. It's also one from a basic policy level that the reason why there's a couple reasons but the biggest reason why the black market still thrives is a lack of retail locations The second being the lack of consumer knowledge about why black market weed is so bad socially and for their own health.
So we can all get out that message, but the other is access to retail locations.
I just want to comment that I think this is the first time that we've had the sheriff come in And be under budget. So kudos to the whole department, I know it's $31,000 and we used to make a big deal about a million dollars even though his budget was $110 million but still this might be the first time so we all had a cupcake at lunch For another reason, but we can pretend it was to celebrate that.
Supervisor Hartman?
I was also going to remark on that and I did have a question. It's become a little vague in my memory but we set aside $2 million at one point for overtime Yeah, remind me.
Supervisors to the Chair we set aside $2 million and that $2 million pot was going to be for overhires because that was an issue to ensure we had adequate staff. Overhires which they hadn't really dipped into because they had so many vacancies but also if they were going to be over budget that we would use those funds and so that's what Mr. Clemente was referring And Supervisors, might I add it is one of the first times I've seen the Sheriff's budget come in slightly positive. But that's also thanks to their staff but also thanks to your board because it was the MAT funding that you allocated to the Sheriffs. It was ARPA funding you allocated to the Sheriff as well so that's helped them resolve their budget issue this year.
Cool. Okay we have recommended actions A and B So moved.
Second.
Moved and seconded, all those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Passes unanimously. Okay that takes us to departmental item number six.
3:34 – 3:476 turns
Chair Lavagnino, members of the board. Departmental item number six is from the County Executive Office. It is a hearing to consider recommendations regarding response to the 2023 through 2024 Grand Jury Report entitled Deaths in Custody in Santa Barbara County Jails. Our county jails meet many needs.
Good afternoon chair and supervisors. I'm Tonya Heitman, Assistant County Executive Officer and with me assisting with the presentation today is Nicole Parmelee, Principal Analyst The grand jury issued a report entitled, Deaths in Custody in Santa Barbara County Jails. Our county jails meet many needs. This report focused on six in custody deaths that occurred between December 2022 and December 2023.
We'll be providing recommended responses and we'll offer some background and updates to support and inform the responses. As you know, the grand jury has spent many, many hours reviewing various aspects of our criminal justice system and they have diligently pursued recommendations focused on potential improvements. I want to thank them for their deep commitment to understanding the jail environment and the challenges associated with it.
Without question, the jail is a challenging area for the jail personnel assigned there and the partner agencies working within the jail, but also for those outside of the jail who strive to understand the nuances and complexities related to its oversight. It is an ever-evolving facility adapting to the needs of the population, the limitations of the physical environment, and the workforce.
Despite the magnitude of these changes, we are committed to improvements. Change is often slower than we would like but we're seeing collaborative system improvements and the criminal justice and health and human service departments are working very closely to coordinate their work and leverage every opportunity for improvement. We have a very diverse group. And while they don't always agree, they consistently show up, engage and through compromise and consensus find a path forward.
Each of the departments are represented here today and will be available to assist in answering questions after the presentation. With that I'll turn it over to Nicole.
Thank you Tanya. Good afternoon Chair Lavagnino and board members. The first finding and recommendation relate to monitoring of the health care services contract with WellPath. This past March, your board approved two new clinical positions in public health.
Nicole,
is your microphone on? It's on. Can you slide it closer to you maybe? Is this better? Yeah. Thank you.
Sorry I lost my slide now. Okay, this past March your board approved two new clinical positions in public health to improve monitoring and clinical oversight of the healthcare services contract. Those positions are a full-time RN as a quality care improvement coordinator for which Public Health's final candidate will be starting the position on September 30th and a medical advisor which is a halftime physician position for which the recruitment has proven more challenging but Public Health aims to identify candidate by November Once that position is filled, the medical advisor will advise the Sheriff's Office, probation and the healthcare provider on evidence-based and comprehensive healthcare services including best practices and NCCHC standards.
They will evaluate services provided in order to identify needs, goals and service plans and they will lead the Medical Advisory Committee and regularly participate in continuous quality improvement. Additionally, the county is working with consultant HMA to support healthcare quality monitoring in line with best practices and the remedial plan requirements.
While additional resources have been added to public health to support quality monitoring it is important to reiterate that these positions will operate in an advisory capacity and that contractual adherence in the jails will continue to rest with the Sheriff's Office as Contract Administrator as well as what the Probation Department as it pertains to the JJC We agree with the grand jury's first finding that when the medical advisor position is filled, this individual will be working with the WellPath staff at the jails.
The accompanying recommendation will be implemented once that position is filled. The medical advisor will help oversee and advise treatment for medically compromised individuals including when they first enter the jails. Along with the QCI coordinator, the medical advisor will monitor and advise on the quality of healthcare services in the jails. They will independently assess compliance and provide that feedback directly to the Sheriff's Office, public health leadership, and to your board.
The medical advisor will also serve as co-chair on the death review committee and the medical advisory committee. The second finding and recommendation relate to substance use and the Medication Assisted Treatment, or MAT program in the jails. MAT is an evidence-based treatment that combines administering medication with counseling or other therapeutic techniques as a whole person approach to the treatment of substance use disorders.
A MAT program was established at the Main Jail in 2018 and at the NBJ in 2022. Since it began, the program has continued to expand services and the number of patients served growing from just 11 patients in 2022 to around 150 today. The program wait list at the NBJ has been reduced to around 60 individuals, and that wait list is anticipated to be eliminated within the next month or so once all of the new nursing positions that were added in the recent WellPath contract amendment are hired.
There's currently no wait list at the main jail. Additionally, discharge planning efforts have been enhanced for MAT patients to connect individuals to services upon release from custody. MAT expansion is also being addressed through the Cal AIM Justice Involved Initiative. BWEL plans to launch Cal AIM Behavioral Health Linkages in fall 2024, to coordinate care in the community for individuals upon release from jail including those receiving MAT services while incarcerated.
Based on the factual determinations made by the Sheriff's Office as conveyed in their response to the grand jury, the county agrees that these two individuals referred to in the report as RU and DL suffered from drug addiction and died within two days of entering the jails. As to the recommendation, your board has already provided resources to increase MAT staffing in the recent WellPath contract extension that was effective July 1st including a substance use disorder counselor position dedicated specifically to MAT as well as additional nursing staff to support MAT expansion.
The third finding and recommendation relate to providing early representation services by the public defender to incarcerated individuals. The Public Defender's Office secured grant funding from the Board of State and Community Corrections, as well as supplementary funding from the CCP, to launch a three-year pilot program for early representation services at the NBJ this past February.
That pilot program is known as REDI. And it funded a team comprised of an attorney, a mental health navigator contracted through Good Samaritan Shelter, a peer navigator that has not yet been filled and two legal support positions as well as outside data evaluation provided through UCSB. The REDI Team provides representation and support to address individual needs and increase diversion at the earliest case stages at pre-arraignment or prefiling in custody pending arraignment, and at arraignment.
Studies have shown that individuals detained in custody before trial often face a higher likelihood of incarceration and longer sentences. Because of early promising results of the North County pilot, the public defender and sheriff staff are collaborating to launch a one-year pilot in South County which is anticipated to begin this fall. To overcome facility limitations of the main jail, the South County program will occur as scheduled teleconferences rather than in-person meetings as is done currently in North County.
The pilot will launch using existing resources with the goal of identifying funding to add resources if program outcomes indicated as working. The county agrees in part with the grand jury's finding that the Public Defender's Office conducts an entry interview with newly incarcerated persons booked into the NBJ, with that connection continuing until those persons are discharged.
The REDI program meets with many, but not all newly incarcerated people in the NBJ. This is because some individuals require stabilization, movement or interpretation services and also because REDI's primary focus is on individuals charged with misdemeanors and low-level felonies. Additionally, the REDI team does not engage with clients until discharge although separately discharge planners do meet with individuals during various stages of their incarceration.
The grand jury recommended that the sheriff's office work with the public defender's office to initiate a similar program at the main jail as in the existing North County pilot and this recommendation is currently being implemented. The pilot program is currently being developed however, as mentioned previously there is currently no funding identified to sustain and grow this effort long term.
The fourth and final finding and recommendation relate to monitoring at-risk persons when they first enter the jail in order to prevent deaths in custody whenever possible. Over the past year, healthcare services monitoring by public health and behavioral wellness has been significantly enhanced including improvements that allow for more closely monitoring at risk individuals when they enter the jail.
Specifically, public health has significantly increased the number of areas it monitors at each facility with six of those areas focused specifically on intake screenings. B-Well has similarly increased its monitoring with five areas focused on intake screenings and more recently monitoring tools have been further updated to include performance measures related to timeliness of referrals when intake screenings identify a mental health need as well as referrals for chronic care management when appropriate.
When an area is identified as being out of compliance, a corrective action plan or CAP is developed by Public Health or B-Well as appropriate and the Sheriff's Office is notified of this. The CAP documents the plan for resolving the area of concern with specific corrective actions proposed by WellPath and approved or revised by Public Health or B-Well. Evidence of corrective action must be submitted in order to resolve the cap, and if it is not resolved timely, it is brought to the Sheriff's Office staff to further address.
As you know, it is ultimately the responsibility of the Sheriff's Office as contract administrator to ensure any deficiencies at the jails are corrected. The county agrees in part with the grand jury's finding here. It is agreed that five of the six deaths in this report occurred within the first three days of those individuals entering the jails. As to the cause of death factors, we referenced the sheriff's response to the grand jury which is included in your packet as attachment B given that the Sheriff's Office investigated each of these deaths.
The recommendation that the Sheriff's Office work with WellPath, BeWell and Public Health to put procedures in place to more closely monitor at-risk incarcerated persons when they enter the jail has been implemented. The departments in WellPath now collaborate monthly to review procedures and strengthen monitoring protocols, however it is ultimately the purview of the Sheriff's Office to implement appropriate procedures and ensure they are consistently followed.
In conclusion, I would like to again thank the Grand Jury for its attention and thorough analysis of these six deaths. Each of which represents a tragic loss of life amid a complex and challenging set of circumstances. As our responses have indicated, the county is aligned with the Grand Jury's desire to provide better supports and coordinated treatment for the incarcerated population, particularly those most at risk in order to prevent these deaths in the future whenever possible.
That concludes the presentation. The departments are represented here today and available to answer your questions, and for the board's consideration we have recommended actions A through C as they appear here on this slide.
3:47 – 3:5824 turns
Thank you for that Nicole. Let's just start on the end. Supervisor Nelson?
Yes thank you Chair Lavagnino. You know one of what I've been harping on continuously is obviously the staffing at WellPath And it's been my feeling that if some of these inmates would have been able to be seen by somebody in advance, it might have been different circumstances. And I know that we've been understaffed in those spots on the intake side. How is that coming along on staffing?
Especially the mental health practitioners under the Woolpath contract. I know we put some incentives in there for them to actually staff those, are they now fully staffed? Because prior to us really digging into this over the last few months, I think that they had still never had staffed the swing shift at North Prince Jail and I think they actually had an opening for the other shift as well so how's that coming along?
Supervisor Nelson through the chair, we'd invite Chief Deputy Wasilewski up he would have the most accurate information on guard
Mr. Chair, the WellPath is still trying to hire most of those positions they have, most of them filled. They still do have one or two LVNs that they're looking to fill at the Northern Branch Jail.
What about the mental health practitioners? Are those filled now? Pardon? How about the mental health practitioners that they had?
The mental health practitioners they filled.
They're fully staffed now? Yes. Okay good news thank you.
Supervisor Hartman
So I'm encouraged that we'll have the public health medical advisor, we believe in November. I would just like to know a little bit more why it's been difficult and what we're doing in the interim with that position?
So we did have three candidates and actually we had for the MD, the medical advisor. We did make an offer unfortunately that candidate declined so now it means we're going back to reposting that and it's just a matter of who is an ideal candidate for that position. The good news is as mentioned our quality coordinator RN has accepted the offer and is currently just in the process will start by the end of the month We are also aware that probably we need to look at increasing maybe the time or the FTE for that position. So, we're looking at how do we entice more candidates to apply for that position?
And so now we have somebody performing that function in the interim?
Yeah, so currently this task is headed or is performed by our Chief Medical Officer Dr. Preciado. She is participating on both the Death Review Committee as well as the MAC and she is very much involved in every step through the RFP and all that. So that function is happening it is just not as a dedicated person as we wanted.
And I have two more questions. I don't think they're for you though, Dr. Hamami. One really has to do with the kind of communication that happens even before booking about the mental state and physical state of the individuals. And it seems that we focused on booking thereafter but The officers learn a lot in the whole process. And I just wonder if somebody could address how that gets communicated?
Supervisor Hartman through the chair, we've developed A questionnaire on our booking sheet that each officer fills out before they drop the person off. And it has questions pertinent to their condition, whether they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol, if they know that they're ill or taking medications, if they showed any sign that they'd harmed themselves.
Fairly basic, but it's right there so that they can fill it out and it will be filled out on every single one. This is a form that goes to all the different agencies so right now we're putting together the training bulletin that's going to go out to the other agencies as well as our own to implement it and it should be out within the next couple weeks.
So that's a real change, and we've integrated that into the form that everybody gets so it doesn't get lost somewhere. And now you've got training coming. That sounds superb. I think you're the one to answer my next question but it's a broad question and it really deals with the Sheriff's Office response to the grand jury report in finding number six Our, my assumption anyway is that we have our crisis stabilization units and our sobering centers there so that we can divert people early on. And it sounds from your answer in 6A I think it is, that it's very limited when you can actually take people to the CSU. And so I would like to understand that better.
Supervisor Hartman through the chair, we book in 10,000 people a year. So when you look at it in a grand perspective here, it is very small. the number that would even qualify for that. They have to be misdemeanor folks, they have to you know be able to be released from our custody without a court order yet so those kind of pre-booking diversions are really limited In the grand scheme of things, but when it comes down to you know how many per week or how many a day? It might be two or three. It might be you know ten a week that would make a big difference But not to that 10,000 that we book in every year if that makes sense That's why it kind of sounds like it might not be
I guess that helps. My thought is we have the teams that go out specially trained, ideally deescalating so we don't get felonies and that we can use the crisis stabilization units to get them stabilized. They are locked At least some months ago the Sobering Center and previously the CSU wasn't being used to full extent. And I think it's really important that they are, and that's part of our overall strategy here.
So can you give me any more information about how your officers are I
know that they have been informed of the service. They know what it's about. We've had some in-service training for the patrol officers so that they know, plus the co-response teams that are out there know what the criteria is for bringing them there and I know that there are folks being diverted there. They're, um, you know, getting a maximum capacity in that, in that facility or not. I'm not sure. I, you know, primarily follow what I'm doing and what's coming into my door rather than that. But I know that there are, uh, they have been using it
Well, that's good to hear. And I know we've just got them up and running again and so we don't have a lot of information but I am eager and ACEO Heitman did you have more to add on this?
Supervisor Hartman, through the chair I would just add that I did have a conversation with the undersheriff on this issue yesterday as well as been in communication with Be Well on the implementation of the full implementation of CSU. We are, Be Well is working directly with the provider to make sure that they're prepared to accept these individuals from law enforcement and that there's protocols in place. And we've begun that conversation with the Sheriff's Office in terms of ensuring that it's as well utilized as possible. And I want to emphasize that for some of the comments they've been referring to this diversion from the jail, which is certainly one option. But it's also quite possible that somebody would go there even if they ultimately are going to go to the jail.
That it would still be appropriate for them to go to the CSU first and get stabilized even if their charges mean that they need to go the jail after stabilization. We would prefer that they be stabilized, right? Rather than left in a situation at the jail where they might not be able to access enough services for their needs at that point. So we wanna make sure that we're looking at it from both sides and that people are getting the right level of care. I think it'll be an ongoing discussion with the Sheriff's Office, the vendor Crestwood as well as B-Well.
And from my perspective it's both the Sobering Center and the CSU. And again, it's so key to our overall strategy I hope that this will come back again maybe in four to six months where we really look at these numbers understand the kind of training that the officers are getting you know how many of the cases are really just regularly trained officers versus our special teams to deal with mental health crises. I'd like to dig into it a little more.
Certainly, Supervisor Hartman through the chair we are capturing data as well as to who is bringing individuals into the sobering centers as well as who's bringing individuals into the CSU so that we can understand the patterns and also see where there might be increased opportunities.
And does four to six months sound good to come back to the board?
Well, certainly it sounds fine to me. I'll talk to Bewell and the sheriff because they all need to be a part of that as well.
3:58 – 4:059 turns
Supervisor Kaps.
Thank you. I just want to again thank the grand jury, I feel as though if it's a board hearing we're having a grand jury response to something related to our jail health and it just shows how serious these issues are and how hard they are and how intractable so I appreciate on this response that a lot of them are being implemented, a lot we agree with To that end, one of the recommendations was about coordination and I'm happy to hear that there's these monthly meetings now happening between all of the right players. And I just was going to put anybody on the spot and ask what's a tangible outcome of progress from increased communication whether it be process or treatment of people? I just would ask for anyone involved to share.
I don't see anyone jumping out of their seats. The public defender actually isn't directly involved in those meeting supervisor caps. I'll certainly encourage our Public Health Director to speak to this issue as well, but one of the things that I want to kind of highlight is the protocols for those that are in safety cells. That was a significant area of concern. It's actually what started a lot of the discussions.
We initially thought it was going to be a limited duration But once we really started looking at the safety cell protocols, we realized there was so much more opportunity for collaboration. So those meetings have continued. Great.
Not that I have any magical bullet or magical answer but definitely this dialogue and what we are starting is a step in the right direction. I think also to be realistic is that to set our expectations in the right direction There are challenges because of how, especially in the main jail, how it is set up. There are challenges that we are aware of vacancies and shortage both on the custody side as well as on the health side so we definitely are looking at ways to improve healthcare through looking at policies and collaboration and anything that can be improved but it's going to be a very combined effort plus looking at how do we change some of those challenges or resolve some of those challenges. So the RFP, we all collaborated on the RFP there are things that are we're expecting in the RFB that would alleviate some of those but again I think it's going to be a little bit hard when we come to the physical structure of the building the main jail and And as well as looking at the vacancies and others.
Yeah, you brought up staffing and I'm sorry to hear that the person that accepted a tough job to fill, the medical director declined but do you talk about hiring in these meetings? Is that an area of collaboration or would that be too much?
Supervisor Capsley, Chair. In those meetings, we've discussed the roles and responsibilities. I see. Primarily for those two new positions, both the RN and the physician because a lot of the work that is happening around monitoring is this collaboration amongst the different agencies. Sure. So those positions often come up. We often talk about what added responsibilities we could build in knowing that those positions are coming And what things should appropriately shift to the positions. The death review also has been a source of discussion because we anticipate they will be involved in any death reviews as well. Anything that is involving the intersection of public health, Contractor Wellpath, the Sheriff and B-Well pretty much comes to this venue for them to discuss and make sure that they're both making progress but also that they're really looking at it from all the different perspectives.
And the CO's office is very much engaged in that and kind of tracking their progress.
Thank you, and since the public defender is here there was a recommendation number 12 I don't really understand too much maybe since you're here to talk about this early representation pilot program and Can you elaborate explain what that is?
First of all it's a pleasure to be here and it's pleasure to be here with the collaborators because I will tell you From the boots on the ground perspective, the Public Defender's Office having the privilege of being in the Northern Branch Jail has made a significant difference because the access that we have not only to the individual but to the resources and the individuals in the jail that are desperately trying to help and triage very sick people who do come into the jail are remarkable. And you'd be proud of what you see there every day. So my attorney and staff are able to work with the Sheriff's Department, B-Well, call public health, whoever we need We're having those real-time engagements. As far as the pilot and launching it in the Southern Branch Jail, where I think we will have remarkable results because of the kind of population that is actually being brought in and incarcerated, is through leveraging our current resources.
We had the privilege of winning a Yale fellow from Yale University, fully paid by Yale who's embedded within our office for next year who is studying early representation and is working and going to be working with our population there. We are gonna also leverage our current resources in our holistic defense program which is continuing to change because of CalAIM and redeploying our resources to help marry our clients to the resources outside there But again, what I want to emphasize is none of this wouldn't have happened without your encouragement for collaboration and our partners willing to allow the Public Defender's Office within the institution that is very challenged to help them help clients get through this process in a humane and kind way.
So we feel very lucky. I think you're going to see remarkable results if I can just brag a little bit We've already seen 453 clients with 514 cases. Of those, the average day in incarceration is 25 days with a disposition rate of closer to 65 days when their case is actually resolved. Those numbers are remarkable given the culture of continuances and the languishing in the jail. So we're not only helping people connect to services, but we're also resolving cases earlier which reduces our jail population in a safe way so we're very proud of the program.
Well that was the tangible piece of good news I was sort of looking for so thank you. Thank you
4:05 – 4:137 turns
And I also like the way you referred to it as the Southern Branch Jail. So from now on, we're going to be Maine Jail is in Santa Maria and the Southern Branch Jail, the branch jail is down here. Yeah.
Supervisor Williams. That's where that's headed. It's where it's going. Well, I just wanted to say first of all, in eight years, I don't think I've ever seen a response to grand jury where it was all agree. And you know, I think it's both Both the fact that, you know, the grand jury has looked diligently and zeroed in on this issue in a number of reports. It's obvious that they, this is not just a one-off.
And so I think that's really helpful and I want to congratulate them for that. And I think it's also about the constructiveness of staff's recommended responses. You know? Part two, though from my standpoint it depends a lot upon Wealth Path's ability to staff and to meet the expectations that we have. And I see one potential weakness in that is that we just got their annual report for 2023 two weeks ago.
There could be this whole like thing where everything is supposedly going great and then we find out a year from now that it wasn't going great. So I just you know, this is mainly an ask for the chief if and we brought it up two weeks ago I know it's a hassle to do a hearing, but maybe at least interim numbers so we can substantiate the idea that there is no waiting time or substantiate the idea that these metrics are improving. And I would just ask the Chief about his response and have you guys talked with WellPath since two weeks ago when they could bring in some of the numbers because that path, that report was I guess fine but it didn't have any recent information. They had claims that things were getting better but not recent information to back it up and I would love to see that recent information and know that we can sleep a little better at night.
Supervisor Williams, through the Chair. The annual report being late had a lot to do with a bunch of different things. I'm not going to get into all of them right now but some of it had to do with just the scheduling and the board scheduling as far as putting it off until after the summer or most Clearly, we've put pressure on them to make sure that their presentation is done a lot quicker and hopefully will be coming to the board probably in January or February which probably isn't gonna help you much sleep but you'll be sleeping better by then anyways.
But I think we do have some numbers. We do have the current numbers Uh, that we go through every month at our, uh, our Mac and CQI meeting. Right? The co-op or whatever meeting that we go to, but that those meetings, we go over those numbers and I'm sure we can share them with you. Um, I don't know that it needs to be in a thing like this, but I, I certainly could send it to you.
I would so much appreciate that. Sure.
Madam Clerk, I think we have one public comment.
Chair Lavinino and members of the board, we do. We will go to Gail Osharenko via Zoom.
Gail? Chair Lavinino and Board Members, I'm speaking today as an individual not on behalf of any group We didn't really know what was gonna happen today, but it's very encouraging that so many of the things that the grand jury pointed out are that there are fixes being implemented so that we hopefully never have another death in the jail. And some of these are things we've been working on a long time and the cooperation among agencies Has made that possible.
So we're really grateful to the office of the CEO and all of the agencies and the sheriff for the progress we're making both in the REDI program, and in filling getting rid of wait lists in the MAT program, the presence of public health Monitoring and advising, there's a lot of progress. That said I have very closely read some of these death in custody reports and I think even the grand jury probably didn't quite pick up on that at least a couple of these deaths might've been avoided if the individuals involved had never come to the jail That when the call went out on 911 for help for JG, that he might have been taken to the hospital because he was talking about back pain and chest pain.
And then that didn't get communicated to the nurse on duty during intake and booking. So that ended up in a very unfortunate death. And something similar happened with JT, who our group has been very attentive to because we held a vigil after we learned of his death and he was taken to the emergency department and told at the emergency... The deputy who took him in was told If he starts to decompensate, bring him back. But information wasn't conveyed to the emergency department that the deputy had at the time.
So it's another case of somebody who had mental issues was talking suicide and really shouldn't have been brought to the jail and maybe would still be alive So we need to look at all the communication issues. It's really good that we have a new protocol and there's going to be training about it, and there's a lot of progress where That I'm very pleased to see happening and we hopefully will be able to sort out more about what why the people aren't taken to the crisis stabilization unit Thank you so much. That is your time.
4:13 – 4:144 turns
If not, I want to thank all the staff that participated and open for a motion.
Supervisors, before you move the items, I would ask if Supervisor Hartman wanted to add to give us direction to have the be well return in the next 36 months about utilization of the CSU sobering center and law enforcement's use? That would be helpful.
So I'll include that in my motion, and in addition A through C with staff's recommendation.
Second. Okay we have a motion and second. All those in favor? Aye. Anybody opposed? That's it. We are adjourning to Tuesday September 17th in Santa Maria.