UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:01 – 0:069 turns
I call the meeting for March 10th, 2026 to order. Roll call please.
Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 2
Show transcript
Roll call? Oh we did roll call sorry. Number four approval agenda
So moved.
I'll second. Motion and a second? I'll
second.
All in favor? Aye. All right, thank you. And moving on to number five, presentations. Tonight we have a proclamation honoring Women's History Month. Proclaiming March as Women's History Month, March 2026. Whereas the month of March is recognized nationally as Women's History A time to celebrate and honor the vital contributions of women to our nation's history, culture, governance, economy, community life. And whereas women of every race, class and ethnic background have made historic and lasting contributions and strength of our country, the state of California and the city of Fillmore.
And whereas women have played and continue to play critical roles in advancing civil rights, public service, education, health care, business, public safety, science, the arts and countless other fields that shape our community and improve quality of life for all residents And whereas women leaders, entrepreneurs, educators, mothers, caregivers and volunteers in Fillmore have helped build a resilient, compassionate and thriving community rooted in service.
opportunity and civic pride. And whereas recognizing Women's History Month provides an opportunity to reflect on the progress made toward equality, to acknowledge ongoing challenges, and to recommit ourselves to ensuring that women and girls have access to opportunities, leadership roles, and equitable participation in all aspects of civic life. And whereas it is fitting and proper that the City of Fillmore join communities throughout the nation in celebrating Women's History Month And honoring the countless women whose dedication and perseverance continue to shape our shared future.
Now therefore, I Albert Mendez mayor of City of Fillmore do hereby proclaim February 2026 as Women's History Month in the city of Fillmore be it further resolved that the city of Fillmore encourages residents schools businesses and community organizations To recognize and celebrate the achievements of women in our community and throughout history. And to support efforts and promote equality, leadership and opportunity for women and girls.
Moving on to item number six, public comments. Do we have any members of the public that are here to speak? Items not in the agenda? No? Okay. Moving on to number seven, City Council reports, recommendations, comments, committee commission and board reports.
Just a couple of items for me. So I attended the Fillmore-Piru Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency meeting on the 20, let me see what day was that? Those are Thursday, the 26th. Not much to report. The United Water Conservation District is going forward. Looks like they're trying to figure out which way to pay for some of the improvements that are required to the Piru or Santa Felicia Dam spillway.
It's gonna be quite an expensive endeavor but they're looking at different ways to do that And they're also looking at an increase in the rates per acre foot. So those are the two main takeaways from that meeting, and then I also attended the Little League and T-Ball opening ceremonies. That was last Friday. That was a lot of fun. I hadn't been to one probably in 30 plus years, and it was a lot of fun. The better part though was watching my grandson's first T-ball game when One of his teammates hit the ball and then ran after the ball to go get it, while the opposing team also tried to get it. So it was fun. It was a lot of fun to watch the kids doing that so that's it for me. Thank you. Anybody
else?
0:06 – 0:146 turns
Thank you Mayor. Yes, I do. So our Ventura Regional Sanitation District meeting, our first one of the month of March was cancelled so I'll have more of an update at our next meeting but just a couple of events that are coming up. March 18th is actually a pretty busy day on my calendar We will be having the groundbreaking for, I think all of our council members are invited and mayor and others here in the city for the Creekside development up in North Fillmore.
That's in the morning. In the afternoon, I'll be participating in the Southern California Edison This is my first one of the year, so I look forward to that meeting hearing updates from Edison. Particularly, you know, I think we're going to have a record weekend of heat this weekend. It's going to be in the 90s, I think. And we had some 90-degree temperatures in February. So that's all to say that these really warm days can happen any time of the year.
High levels of heat and potential, you know, potential shut off. So I'm really looking forward to seeing hearing the updates. I'll provide that back as well. And then later on on the 18th in the evening, I'll be attending and all are welcome. The community to, it's the Economic Development Board of Ventura County in conjunction with the Fillmore Adult Schools having their second annual job and resource expo. And this is gonna take place again Wednesday March 18th from 5 PM to 7 PM at the Fillmore Middle School, 543 A Street. And there'll be professional resume assistance, virtual reality career exploration Free professional photos, which I think is really wonderful so people can have that. Tuition assistance information about tuition assistance maybe on some vocational programs and also just more information about a community assistance programs.
So there's a flyer, I'll be sure to share that with the city and we can help to promote this. But it's Wednesday March 18th 5 PM at the middle school job resource fair. Thank you.
I attended a VCTC, Ventura County Transportation Commission meeting on Friday and we spent the majority of our three hours listening to a gentleman A representative from the National Committee for the, I almost said 84, the 28 Olympics. And for those of you who aren't aware there is a website that's titled LA28 and it's the official website for the upcoming Olympics. And I hadn't put a whole lot of thought into it. I know it's in L.A., but after hearing this gentleman speak it occurred to me that communities on outlying areas such as Our community here in Fillmore, we need to be prepared for this because some of the stats that this gentleman from LA 28 shared with us.
For example he said this is the largest Olympics that they've ever held ever in history. He also said that this based on the number, there's more events than any other Olympics. And they're expecting more people to be in the Southern California region, LA area specifically, than any gathering of human beings ever in history. So the reason Ventura County Transportation Commission is involved in this is because obviously transportation is a huge issue when it comes to the number of visitors coming to the region.
But I'm kind of floating along here thinking, okay well it's down in LA and until I heard this gentleman speaking and it occurred to me that we need to be prepared. He pointed out that not everybody that's going to be visiting the area will be attending every event. So in other words, they're gonna have a lot of downtime and when they have downtime not attending events, they're gonna go to the beach. They're gonna go out exploring the area.
I can see taking advantage of this but what I'm thinking is that we don't need to deal with it right this minute but I think we need to start thinking about possibly an ad hoc committee or something of that sort
If I may just chime in, so we have been attending the economic development staff meetings and there has been discussions about having a plan. And so we have been behind-the-scenes advocating to make sure that the initial thought was just to highlight the 101 corridor and then our staff member was like wait a minute! There's a different way for you to get to the beach and it's the 126 so we also need to be on the map So that discussions are actually happening behind the scenes.
And we can start providing you with updates as this continues. That would make me feel a lot better. Okay,
so and it'd be nice if we could like put up a couple of hotels while we're between. Anyway, so that was really really interesting and I've never been a you know like the sports but I've never tuned into Olympics on a fanatical basis but I'll be watching this one from a distance. I don't want to get down in the crowd. So anyway so there was that and then also
quick question on that topic did they mention anything about having any events at Casitas?
There are no events being held. The rowing is going to be held at a lake, I'm drawing a blank on it, it's down toward the Long Beach area so there will not be any events up here specifically but that doesn't mean we won't have crowds. So we need to take advantage of that I think. Be proactive. Okay. And then let's say I attended a school district meeting this morning, two plus two we call it, we get together with two other of the board members, their school board members as well as superintendent and then our city manager Participates as well, and we do we talked about the partnering issues and things that we have in common And how we can assist one another with regard to?
the use of facilities It's all sorts of things. It was very very productive, and I think we'll hear more details soon on what are some things that will be occurring as a result of that meeting and Then I also have my porch talk on Wednesday this week again. So anybody who is interested in talking about anything Fillmore, please join me on my front porch and we meet at six o'clock and it's supposed to be 6-8 but sometimes we go 6-9. Sometimes it's 6- 930 but it's all good so please join us if you'd like to come in here or bring up issues regarding Fillmore. Thank you.
0:14 – 0:152 turns
No updates for me, the only thing I would like to remind you that I am having a meeting town hall slash meeting greet on March 28th at Delores State Park from 11am to 1pm. And so that's an opportunity for me to meet people from Fillmore or anybody who wants to stop by and say hi! So I'm going to be doing a little data walk with that too just grabbing some information Those who attend. In addition to that, I did invite a few local nonprofits to come and share local resources for those who attend. So hopefully we'll see more of attendance. Thank you.
Thank you. I also, this past week attended the Fillmore Little League Opening Ceremonies. It was a great event. Always love to support the youth. I also attended the Fillmore Girls Softball Fast Pitch. They're in their inaugural season and it was amazing. Those little girls are, man they're superstars. It was awesome. And I also attended along with Council Member Brogy our 2 plus 2 meeting. She covered pretty much She said not much to report there. I also attended the air pollution control board.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
There wasn't much on the agenda, so I don't have much to say about that. And I heard that the event at the theater this past weekend was really, really good and a lot of positive things to say about that. So thank you, Sean for putting that on. OK. Oh yeah. Saturday? I heard, I saw on social media they were having a cruise night. So I got on my little electric bike and was on my way to the 126 but I ran into it there decided to cruise on Central and it was really really well attended. I think they had over 100 cars. The people were gathered here in that park with their lawn chairs and people taking videos and it was really really good.
They plan another event soon Help people come out to support them. It was really, really good. It brought the community together and I ran into Council Member Garnica and his grandson there as well. So it was really good so that's all I have to report.
We're talking about the sports and moving into spring softball and baseball. I just wanted to give a shout out of the thank you to City of Fillmore, to all the staff on a great youth basketball season. You know it was every year I think it's really great and feels like there's even more kids who are playing so Particularly thank you to the staff, to Amanda DeZavala. Thank you Manuel Minares and your referee team did a great job. And yeah it's just wonderful to see all the work and all of the collaboration and the parents and kids really enjoying the league so thank you. Great season!
I forgot also attended the Heritage Valley Blazers had their opening track meet this past Saturday and my granddaughter participates in track It was a great event. I mean, this Saturday there's so many events happening in Fillmore. It was awesome. There's people that I don't know if they were from Fillmore or not but came to Red Engine. Red Engine had an event. So it was awesome.
Farmers Market down at the park down here. So it was awesome, we just got to keep spreading that the news and hopefully we get other people from outside of Fillmore to come in and visit our town and start patronizing our businesses because we have so much so much offer to not just our residents but other people coming from out of town. Thank you. Moving on to number eight, the consent calendar
I'll make a motion on the consent.
Second. You got a second? All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? No? Motion passes, thank you. Moving on now to our regular new business item 9A consideration of offsite improvement agreement and license agreement for public improvements and related to the people's self-help housing project. Kevin?
Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the council. This is not my item. I've asked the city engineer if I could give an introduction to this item. For the last seven years or so we've heard about a development called People's Self-Help or Fillmore Terrace and that's all you know. You don't know anything else about it. It did not get presented to you. You did not review it.
Didn't go to the planning commission either. I reviewed it, everything was given to me to review because we followed a state law and the developer called People's Health Help. Follows state law for the Supportive Housing Act which basically means as long as you follow the zoning ordinance and as long as you follow the general plan you can approve a project administratively It does not require a planning commission or public hearings or city council, ministerial approval only. It's also exempt from CEQA or environmental review and that's basically it in a nutshell there is a lot more to it than that.
The project consists, is located right across the street from our bus shelter from Senior Center. It's one full block that runs along the length of Palm Street to Highway 126 up the alley and back to Santa Clara Street. It's about 50 units. 31 of them will be for very low income, 18 for low income. It'll include a manager's unit and something called supportive housing.
That's a term so that It's a nice way of saying it's for people who are homeless. It's just another name. We're only providing about 45 parking spaces, and I'll explain a little bit of that. And we're merging five lots into one lot, and it will include a tremendous amount of land dedication and diagonal parking along Palm Street and off-site public improvements and license agreements. That's what you're going to be reviewing tonight In the support of housing or in the application, they ask for something called a density bonus.
The density bonus pretty much states the applicant's allowed to go above and beyond your density and that portion that goes above the density is for affordable housing. In return, the developer can request concessions or a waiver or incentives, those three categories. So they first requested a concession so they tried to increase density that means you're taking more of the land and the number one concession is to reduce the parking ratio And then there are three waivers that we did.
There's a requirement in our downtown specific plan and zoning ordinance to provide public or private open space, we've reduced that amount. We also number two, reduced the garage requirement and design requirement. And number three, we reduced the common usable area and we reduce the unit size requirement And reduced parking. We allowed parking in our setbacks and in the side yard, and we reduced the side yard setbacks.
And then we received incentives, which is regarding more parking reductions and uncovered parking. So we had to do all those things to increase the density, to realize the density of 50 units per acre. Our standards were too strict to recognize that density. I wanted to show you the general layout. After describing all the things that we removed, it sounds like it's so congested and so tight that no codes were followed but that's not true. We broke the buildings into five separate buildings A, B, C and D.
To accommodate more parking, we approved diagonal parking along Palm Street. So through this process, we're increasing the width of the alley. I think four or five feet. We're increasing the width of Santa Clara Street. If you drive down Santa Clara Street sometimes it's a little too tight. We're receiving about 13 feet to widen Santa Clara Street. We are widening Palm Street and increasing with diagonal parking so it's very tight parking right now. It's all public parking and even the diagonal parking will be public parking And then along Highway 126, we're anticipating that one day the highway will be widened with one lane in each direction.
I just wanted to give that background. It's called Fillmore Terrace. My review is very rigorous. I was very, very strict. I know the applicant wasn't happy with it but every single affordable project we've done here in the City of Fillmore has been a major, major success. This one will be too if they get enough funding to build the project and we're proud of it and the applicant is too. That concludes my presentation.
I know the applicants are in the audience and then the city engineer would like to give the presentation.
Just for clarification, so people self-help came to us several years ago with that property in mind wanting to build the low income housing. And it was if I recall correctly and I don't remember if I was on council or planning at the time.
Planning? Yes, we presented it to you. So at that time they did not want to follow the zoning ordinance and they do not want to follow the general plan and we presented the project to you and at that time it was a three story building for the whole block. It was one big block building the entire block three stories. And city staff had a very difficult time reviewing it. We weren't in favor of it and we presented it to the Planning Commission, and you replicated the exact same comments staff did. Well people self-help
0:25 – 0:319 turns
heard that they threw that entire project away. They hired new engineers, new planners, new architects submitted a brand new application
Okay, that's good. Good to know because I know initially with that Look like a prison. I think
it did It was difficult for it looked like an affordable project You know the tenement housing from like let's say the East Coast whatever it look like that This project that we approved does not look like this. That's
great Yeah quite an improvement so thank you for
yeah, hopefully it'll be like the the mini mansion project that we had Hopefully get this same rave reviews
Okay, great. Thank you.
Thank you.
Any public speakers?
Thanks Kevin and yeah I'm your city engineer Roxanne I'm going to continue to talk about it. I'm really glad that Kevin was able to present this project to you, catch up to speed on where it's gone because it did go right through planning department under Kevin's discretion which we're in safe hands with Kevin so thank you Kevin good job. And the business tonight is we've gotten to where we've reviewed all the improvement plans identified the costs of the improvements and created the offsite improvement agreement.
A bunch of public improvements and then turn them over to the city, and if for any reason once you start building you go away. The city has bonds on that we can finish the construction of the sidewalks and curbs and gutters so we don't get left with a city that's like half constructed right? So, the offsite improvement agreement is in your council packet. On an entirety along with the full conditions of approval on the project that are referenced from the improvement agreement. But a quick list of what's being bonded for is it's over $800,000 worth of public improvements that people self-help will be building for the city of Fillmore as a part of this development. I've broken it down kind of frontage by frontage. So like on Santa Clara Street, they are giving a 13 foot irrevocable offer of right-of-way dedication on Santa Clara Street You'll see in the next picture that we're not going to completely widen that whole block because you can't be like driving down a narrow street and then have a wide street and then a narrow street again Because it's just one block but what we did do is we popped out and we have parallel parking in between curb extensions so we can use all like We do widen Santa Clara in the frontage, but we do it with curb extensions which I'll show you a picture of.
So it worked out really elegant solution and we have the 13 foot right-of-way dedication on that side. And then it's curb gutter sidewalk streetlights, that parallel parking there's tree wells in the sidewalks with trees they're building new public fire hydrants on Santa Clara Street and ADA ramps. Palm Street similar There's tree planters and trees in the diagonal parking. They have those diamonds, and there's trees every other diamond. And they're doing a new sewer manhole on Sewer Wise because all their sewer lines connect in Palm Street.
Their main site driveway is off of Palm Street. They're also doing streetlights and ADA ramps on Palm Street. And the alley on the other side, they will be widening the alley. The existing alley is only 16 feet. A lot of our alleys are narrow like that all along the project frontage. They're dedicating four feet and making a 20 foot wide alley and then towards the north end by Santa Clara there's another property that's not them so we'll go back down to 16 feet but for now until that property develops but we will have a nice widened alley and they'll be overlaying the entire alley up to Santa Clara Street so it'll be brand new pavement And they're also doing a lot of overhead utility work. There's a ton of overhead wires on Palm Street and so they'll be taking them off the poles, undergrounding In some cases, relocating them to the other side of the street because there's so many things that can't be downed that aren't on their frontage that they couldn't do anything about.
They worked with Edison to get as much underground as we could. So all along the property frontage there will be no overheads but some of it is moving to the other side of the street, the east side of the street in the alley and then on Ventura Street They're going to do curb gutters, sidewalk ADA ramps, landscaping and trees. And there's a new parkway drain that drains their parking lot that's on that side of the use. So I have a picture kind of like Kevin did just to give you a visual of everything we talked about if you look at Santa Clara Street, you can see the curb extensions and then One, two, three, four parking spots. So if you park on that side you pull out of Santa Clara and Park, which the fire chief was super happy about because there's parking on both sides and it gets pretty tight.
So that'll be a lovely use and there's like tree wells along there to look really nice. And then you see all the diagonal parking along Palm Street. And then their main parking lot, which is an open you know not covered parking on the highway 126 and there will be new sidewalk all along. There's existing sidewalk out though they're going to replacing all that sidewalk and putting a new curb ramps And in the alley, you can see that four-foot widening of new pavement that then goes back to 16 when you get to the other parcel. That's not a part of the project. So that's the offsite improvement agreement. They'll be giving us $810,000 in secured bonds to build all of that stuff. And that's what that agreement is about. And then there's also a license agreement in your packet, and the license agreement is a document that basically is between the developer and the city that secures that they can put their private improvements in our public right of way and then ongoingly maintain them so it puts the rules and responsibilities surrounding.
They're going to give us on a 14 foot dedication for road right away on the highway side so If and when Caltrans ever widens the highway, we can get to that 100-foot Caltrans right of way. In the meantime, we're going to allow them to landscape it and then maintain the private landscaping. And so the license agreement gives them the permission and the responsibility to maintain that landscaping in right away that they dedicated to us. And so this is the exhibit that's also with the license agreement in your council packet. And that really concludes my presentation, and I'm open to any questions.
0:31 – 0:3615 turns
Questions?
Just a comment. I think it looks great, I think it's a great project and certainly better than what was described before and so I would be happy if it looks like what the ground view was. I think it's going to look beautiful.
I would add for all of those right-of-way dedications, we have it in municipal code that the city manager can accept dedications of street right-of way. And so as all those documents come to fruition and are ready for acceptance, Erica will be doing that.
Just a question, comment first on the question. It did look like there was a good number of spaces on Palm for parking. I was wondering if you had a total number? We were, I was trying to add them up with my fingers.
There's 45 total with the whole project. Forty-five, okay. Including their own street parking in Palm Street and Santa Clara, right? Have we counted the off-street ones? Okay. That was what was in the first slide but a lot of them are on Palm Street. Yeah. But they're not specific to the use, they're public parking. Okay got it.
Um, we Had information from People Self Help a long time ago when this was first brought to us, the original version of it. About the way the residents, the security that's going to be there that I thought once people self help is going to provide some sense of security and when we discussed it awhile back, the concern is taxing bringing in homeless population into this location And then possibly taxing the hours of our law enforcement here in Fillmore.
And at one point in time, there was on people's self-help if I recall correctly, they had plans to have someone onsite. And I've asked this question a couple different times. And I don't know is where do we stand on that? I mean, that's my biggest
concern. We made that a condition of approval and the developer agreed to it so they'll have people on site managing as best they can and they're qualified too.
Okay. And do we have a total number of hours?
I do, I need to reread the condition and I'll forward it to all of you.
But the applicants here too perhaps they can just answer the question.
Good evening, Mayor, Councilmembers. Tanner Shelton with Sandbell. We're honored to serve as the planning consultants on this project. Councilmember Brogy, to answer your question, as Kevin was saying there will be an onsite staff person there, a property manager, as well as caseworkers who will be monitoring the project site. We also were conditioned by the city to submit what is called I'm going to forget the exact name but effectively a security plan that has to be reviewed and approved by the City's Police Department prior to certificate of occupancy So there will be a comprehensive security system on the property as well. That's not just human bodies, they'll also be security cameras and things of that nature alarm systems and the like to secure the facility.
And then the internal courtyard will also be secured as well from from the public so we've worked extensively with planning staff, the police department in the city engineers to work through those concerns and we're happy with the result. Thank you.
Actually, Mayor if I may and Tanner, I may have another question for you and Etika. And it is concerning about the topic we're on right now. And that is that this is a family affordable housing project. And being so, that does limit certain individuals from being able to live in this affordable housing. So I wondered if either one of you could speak to that?
Yeah, I'll invite Daisy up from People Self Help Housing to talk a little bit about kind of what their envisioned target population is but we have a variety of bedroom sizes One, two and three bedrooms across the project. So we're targeting a broad range of folks and families are certainly a part of that dynamic. So Daisy I don't know if you have anything to add about specifically target populations or anything of that nature but yeah. Thank you.
Council members. Yeah, I mean, I think we have 50 units on site. Most of the units are set aside for families. It's only 13 units that are set aside for permanent supportive housing but as Tanner mentioned, we do have a case manager. We do have case managers and supportive services staff on site and we do have a property manager that lives onsite as well. I don't know if that answers your question.
Just for Councilmember Brogy, I believe that I'm in the right about this is that in affordable housing projects that include family there are restrictive to individuals.
0:37 – 0:4422 turns
So I think your question is pertaining that if someone has some sort of a record or like a rap sheet that I believe to be part of this project because there's families. Yeah, so yes you're on the right track and I
didn't know exactly what the And
we have had those discussions with them. You know, when we were looking at the funding mechanisms and like the tiers to get your points for your funding and so that's something that has been taken under consideration. Manuela and I have been closely working with transition of the shelter and I think if it does come into fruition there will be the ability to house those individuals may potentially have a rap sheet into a men's shelter only. So there's different avenues to make sure that we're meeting our on-house population needs.
Great, thank you for that clarification. I just think it was important to the conversation that we know that there are restrictions here at the affordable housing.
If I could just clarify, unhoused people isn't the only definition of supportive housing. Other types of people that have housing insecurity go there so it's a variety of people and families.
Yeah, I mean it could be somebody with like a developmental disability. That's somebody else that might go into the permanent supportive housing unit at risk could also go into the permanent supportive housing unit so it doesn't necessarily have to be that somebody is directly homeless. It could be somebody who's at risk of homelessness or right like
someone who
just aged out of the foster
system there are a lot of different people who fall in that category of supportive housing okay
Just so I'm clear though, we're not talking about that anybody going into the self-help building would be a family. There will be singles there will be maybe two in one apartment but not solely restricted to family units
So only the 13 units will be for permanent supportive housing. The rest of the units are for families, but really it's based on the occupancy level for each individual unit. Thank you.
Yeah, thanks.
Okay any other questions?
I just want to thank staff on all their hard work and When it first came, I was on the planning commission and it totally welded to the project that we have here. And all the hard work you guys did, thank you so much.
You're welcome. Teamwork.
OK. Nothing else? No other speakers on this? No? Can I get a motion?
I'll move that the City Council authorize the city manager or designee to execute the off-site improvement agreement and accept the performance and payment bonds for required public improvements fronting this subject project, and authorize the city manager or designee to execute a license agreement for the use of the city right-of-way along Ventura Street State Route 126 for additional landscaping and miscellaneous features to be owned and maintained by People's Self Help Housing.
Okay we got a motion second? I'll second it. Okay motion second all in favor?
Aye
Any opposed? Motion passes, thank you.
Moving on to item number 9B fiscal year 2025-2026 midyear financial report. Deborah?
So good evening council members Mayor Mendez I'm Deborah Cavaletto finance director. Item 9b has staff recommending the City Council to receive the Mid Year Financial Report and approve the proposed mid year budget adjustments For tonight's presentation, I'll be discussing the General Fund Special Revenue and Deferred Capital Projects. And Anne-Marie Tabay, our accounting supervisor will be talking about the capital improvements requests.
For the general fund as discussed in the staff report, the request for additional general fund appropriations include approximately $100,000 in transfers to other projects which will be discussed in this presentation and approximately $57,000 to general fund operations. For general fund operations, this includes a new work truck to replace the 2003 aging truck and a projected increase in park management costs and contract services for developer trust account review and financial department support.
In the case of the bike path maintenance fund We are planning to complete the city hall handicap parking. This has been in work since probably, since 2000 I believe, 13-14 and that includes approximately $68,876 appropriation requested from the bike path of 57,876 with the remaining 11,000 coming from the aforementioned recommended transfer from the general fund.
50% of the project is being funded by the Transportation Development Act local transportation funds, or called Article III. A budget adjustment at $49,125 is requested from the general fund transfer mentioned above as costs are projected to be over budget. These include cost in utility costs, various program costs and a reallocation of a liability insurance expense of $19,000 which was not part of the original budget Recreation makes up various services in the area, which include grant program fees and the general fund that support it.
These services include the senior nutrition program, the active adult center and youth basketball. Capital projects are budgeted annually and throughout the year. Of the 2026 budget capital projects that are being deferred to future fiscal years are the Sespe Creek bike path, the Central Avenue storm drain first to third and a portion of the Waterline project. The projects that were submitted during this mid-year projection review For consideration, the storm drain county country court and stadium way projects have been deferred as well as the orchard streetlight and the city's portion of the Fillmore neon sign. That means the city goes and does the trenching in Edison comes in for that project.
They have been deferred either for next fiscal year or be become maybe coming up to upcoming available at later City Council meetings Consideration includes the timing of right now the fiscal year. Of course, we are in March and can they can the project be completed as well as being the cost of the project? It may be so high that we like want to come to City Council to discuss more of the project and being considered a shovel ready So now I'm gonna be turning over the presentation to Ann Marie
0:44 – 0:5911 turns
Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council. I am Amber Thibay. I'm the Accounting Supervisor and I'm here to present the major budget adjustment requests for the Capital Improvement Funds. First is the Street Improvement Fund 467. Staff recommends a budget adjustment of $35,000 from the General Fund. And this request is for the driveway repair and resurfacing project totaling $25,000 and installation of a street light which cost estimate of $10,000. Both of these projects are ready to proceed in the coming months and will maintain the city's safety standards.
Next one is the Public Buildings Improvements Fund 490. Staff recommends a budget adjustment of $5,455 from the general fund and the reallocation of Fund 490 which funds from the Cespe Creek bike path that Deborah mentioned which is $44,545 which has been deferred to next fiscal year. And remaining savings from the storefront roof project of $15,000. Additional funds from the general fund are being requested for the perimeter improvements at the public works yard and active adult center totaling $45,000. And the upgrade of City Hall's fire alarm system which is $20,000 The Public Works Yard Perimeter Project will address traffic flow to provide a more secure environment During hazardous waste day events at the location. So the $5,455 is the net of the transfer and the request.
The next one is a sewer capital fund 463. Staff recommends a budget adjustment of $95,000 from Sewer Replacement Reserve Fund for 503. Staff is requesting additional funds from the Sewer Capital Replacement Reserve Fund for three projects needed at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. These projects are to upgrade plant security, $25,000, repair and replace the sludge conveyor which manages the byproducts of the treatment process, $30,000 and replacement of the UV bank in Area B, which disinfects to remove harmful pathogens and contaminants. And that's 40,000.
The project maintains efficiency and operational standards and safety. Next portion of my presentation is to provide an update to the remaining capital improvement projects carried over from prior year. The two capital improvement funds, Fund 464 which is a park improvement and Fund 453 Water Capital Improvement Funds have expenses relating to prior year City Council approved projects which were not able to finish in fiscal year 25.
The remaining expenses of these projects, the AMI or the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project in Fund 453 and the Two Rivers Lighting and Landscaping Project in Fund 464 continued in fiscal year 26. Approved funding committed to the projects remain to cover these expenses. These funds will be re-established into the adjusted budget for this fiscal year 2026.
Approval of the recommended budget adjustments to fund unbudgeted expenses or negative fund balances is needed to meet this city's operational activities. As also explained, sufficient funding exists to accommodate these transfers. That concludes my presentation and I'm here to answer your questions.
Questions? Do we have any other speakers on this from the public?
I didn't have a question, but just sort of a comment and reassurance that these mid-year budget adjustments are really needed. I think it's said well under fiscal impact in the staff report That this is needed to meet the city's operational activities and I think that's just the word operational is very key. And that, you know we need to move things around a little bit and transfer some things in from the general fund and defer because we need to meet the city's basic operational needs this fiscal year so just sort of You know, to put that out there. Understand it and you know thank you for the presentation and really laying out why these are needs and where the money is coming from what's you know what is being deferred so it's very clear.
So thank you Amber.
We work closely with a public works director and the city manager and we prioritize the projects and push the projects for next fiscal year if it's not a priority.
Thank you. I just want to make a general comment. Thank you for all the work that the finance department has put into this. At a different level, though, I think it would be good for the City Council to have special public meetings regarding budgets and training. Obviously this is a lot of individual line items that need to be taken care of I think just overall educating the public as well as the City Council on, for example, we say that we've got six goals, five goals. Okay so how does that, how does the city council's goals line up with the actual expenditures that are seen in the budget?
I mean, we could probably use AI to help us answer that question. But I think it'd be good for staff to help educate us and the public regarding the budget because even though like I said, I'm not questioning any of these transfers specifically but I think at a higher level, I think it would be very good to do that. And I've asked just to see if maybe we could do that not for this next budget year, but maybe moving forward if we can plan for that I think that would be a great idea.
Just to comment on that John, I'm in agreement with you and I think that a suggestion to come out of this is we're planning on having a very general Budget 101 introductory education for the community, but also for council members. Right? And I think kind of talking about the budget process and how we begin and mid-year we do these adjustments, why we do the adjustments, why it's important, how it aligns with the goals of the city is definitely should be included in that. So that's my suggestion. Thank you for bringing that up.
Anybody else? May I have a motion?
I'd like to move motion for the fiscal year of 2025 2026 mid-year financial report for fiscal year 25 26 and approval of the mid-year budget adjustment.
Okay we got a motion, second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes thank you.
Moving on to item 9c consideration of zoning ordinance amendment 25-03 ordinance 26-992, removing the one third retail requirement from the Central Business District Corps and adoption of exemption
from CEQA. Thank you Mr. Mayor good evening members of the City Council my name is Jacob Choker I'm a planning technician with the Community Development Department and I've been working on this zoning ordinance amendment Just to provide you a little bit of background on the Central Business District. Downtown Fillmore is the historical and cultural heart of the city from the very beginning, beginning in 1888 when the city was plotted by the Southern Pacific Railroad.
The original businesses were actually on Main Street but a fire in the early 20th century destroyed those businesses and they decided to rebuild on Central Avenue. The downtown A specific plan was adopted in 1994 and that has guided development and redevelopment in the area since then, most crucially in the wake of the 1994 Northridge earthquake. A variety of businesses are present in the downtown specific plan area or central business district.
I'll detail that later in my presentation as to how that actually breaks down. We also have our tourist and culture-oriented businesses, including the town theater, the winery and two museums. A little bit of history on the one third retail requirement. This was added in the 1994 zoning ordinance to support the goals of the downtown specific plan. This requirement was reviewed by the City Council in 2010, 2012, 2017 The planning commission met twice and conducted two public hearings in January They have recommended removal of the one-third retail requirement.
However, they also had recommendations for the Council to continue implementing the Downtown Strategic Plan from Retail Strategies, create incentive programs for retail businesses in the area and retain the existing design standards that you find in the Zoning Ordinance and the Downtown Specific Plan. As far as the, this is a breakdown of the land uses downtown. Retail is that biggest chunk at 20%. This is various types of retail, grocery stores, antique stores, convenience stores and then the next largest use downtown is vacant retail space. This is space that it's built and it's ready to go in there's just no tenant there.
Barber shops and salons are the next most common use downtown. It's pretty self-explanatory. The miscellaneous uses category is one, it's kind of a catch all. I've got red tagged buildings in that category as well as the town theater, a pet groomer and an event venue so those are, it's a catch all for those uses. After that we have public facilities. Public facilities includes parking lots, the police station and the active adult center and the post office.
And as you can see with the pie chart After retail and vacancies, it's all pretty much evenly distributed as far as the uses go. You have medical offices, restaurants, gyms and then different auto-related uses so auto dealerships and things like body shops, auto repair. As part of the Planning Commission, we wanted planning staff to take a look at what neighboring cities do in their downtown. We looked at Old Town New Hall in Santa Clarita and the High Street area in Moore Park. When looking at Santa Clarita, the City adopted a specific plan there as well in 2005 to guide the redevelopment and revitalization of their historic downtown.
The city, they implemented similar programs to the City of Fillmore and the City of Moorpark to push that revitalization and redevelopment. They used RDA loans back when the Redevelopment Agency was still around. And they also invested in street improvements and storefront grants to various businesses. I actually walked downtown Newhall. I'm a resident of Newhall. I walked there to see what kind of businesses are there, breweries, restaurants. They have a theater and the public library downtown as well in addition to professional offices, barbershops and different types of retail such as liquor stores and general stores.
The High Street and Moore Park, a similar story. They have a specific plan for their downtown that was adopted in 1998. Their downtown is the area around High Street, also historic downtown. One of the reasons I chose New Hall and Moore Park is because their downtown has a similar trajectory to Fillmore's downtown where they were the center of commercial life in the city up until the mid-20th century when suburbanization and the automobile And each city looked at this decline and responded pretty much in the same way with grants, a specific plan and then public investment into the area.
High Street's also home to a variety of businesses. The city has also made a concerted effort to locate public facilities in the High Street area. I believe they're constructing a new public library downtown, and I think they have plans to eventually relocate their City Hall downtown as well. What we're asking the council to do tonight is strike the following from the Fillmore Municipal Code.
It's pretty much the requirement for that front one-third to be retail. That's the only change that is being proposed, we're not proposing changing any design standards or any other sections of the zoning ordinance it's just this language that's being struck from the municipal code. Staff is recommending that City Council open the public hearing, receive public testimony and approve the first reading of ordinance number 26992 removing the one-third retail requirement from the central business district core.
And that concludes my presentation I'm happy to take any questions. Thank you, Jacob. Questions for
0:59 – 1:0614 turns
Jacob? Yeah so my main question is what do we think is going to happen or what is the purpose of removing the one-third retail because I mean looking at the history and I read through it all in the council packet obviously it's been looked at many many times and we've chosen to keep it every time before this So number one, what do we think it's by removing? What do we hope to gain?
And the second part of the question is what do we think is different this time than those previous I believe was five times that we looked at it.
Yeah as far as what we hope to gain probably flexibility for the property owners downtown to be able to find tenants who are not retailers. I know retail is a difficult business model As you know, with the advent of Amazon and online shopping it's hard to maintain a brick-and-mortar retail establishment. As far as what's changed I'd have to say nothing much has changed since the previous times that we've looked at it.
Yeah, I think not much has changed since then.
So just to summarize it, basically what we're looking at is we're hoping that we get higher or lower vacancy rates and that's really what's prompting this. And I mean, I guess kind of reading between the lines in my kind of reading between the lines and thinking that well, we didn't look at it previously or we didn't make the change previously but we didn't get the results we wanted So are we thinking, well, you know, we didn't do it before and we'd get the results we wanted. We're still in the same situation. So hopefully by removing this, we'll see a change? Is that kind of the thinking?
Yeah, addressing the vacancy rate is I think the biggest issue that we're hoping to address by removing the one-third retail requirement. Right. Thank you.
Yeah, on that same line of discussion. And I actually was the one who raised this at a council meeting and said can we look at this? Can we re-evaluate this because...and that was my thinking exactly is I've seen over the years you know the 1 third retail and if someone is interested in starting a business but they don't have any retail then I think that's one reason we have more empty storefronts so it were kind of Fighting with okay Turning Fillmore into the touristy type, you know like new hall type Attraction which would be my goal. I would love to see that but Is it worth having? The vacancy level that we have And I do I do believe there are people that come in and say well You know, I'm not gonna sell retail so I'm not gonna even consider renting or putting my business in here But that was that was my line of thinking when I raised the whole issue And I don't see over the years the one-third retail helping, you know meeting the goal that we had originally hoped for in implementing that code section.
So yeah it just made sense to me and two other council members must have agreed with me since it's on the agenda.
We do have two public speakers so let's hear from them first
No, just discussion I guess.
But any questions for?
No.
Thank
you. Okay, I have Eric Swinson or okay, I have Sean McCullough.
Hi. So for the people who are viewing and may watch this later, I'm Sean. I own the Fillmore Town Theater. Most of you guys already know that. One of the reasons why I wanted to rescind the one-third retail is I had a business going into one of the buildings that the theater owns And it's only 460 square feet by the blueprint. The actual usable area is about 300 square feet and to turn that into one third retail, this is a real estate and notary office would be impossible. She basically could not do business.
But now there's even more fire for the argument against the one-third retail because I've talked to two business owners. I got to know all of the business owners because of the downtown rehab grant program, most of you know about that. Two of them very recently have said if the one third retail stays we're not going to put in a business. These businesses are not real estate agents or nothing wrong with that, or tax accountants. Nothing wrong with that either.
They're service organizations but their service for the public one of them is entertainment for kids. The other one you know is a business I think you guys are aware of coming in from Goleta that is therapeutic massage and things like that. You're not going to be able to put a real estate agent in Patterson's, which is our most recent vacant building. They're not going to go into Robert Dedlow's empty building into the larger buildings maybe some of the smaller buildings sure I don't want to see central covered you know in those kinds of businesses I want to see central covered in experiential retail. Retail like Jacob said is a very tough business to be in One suggestion from one of the city planning commissioners was, well they can just put candy out front to cover if it's a not a retail business.
I don't see how that would actually work. Like you were saying, we've kept it this long. It didn't work. If you change nothing, nothing is going to actually change. And then I would like to add to Jacob's excellent work there. You talked about a 10% vacancy for the buildings but there's also an 8% vacancy of unused land. In other words, there's nothing there.
In my mind, that's an 18% vacancy. If we want to get stuff coming down in here and what we've done before hasn't worked, then we do need to change something. And now Eric is going to argue the opposite side.
Thank
you, Sean.
1:06 – 1:114 turns
So I wasn't here for the January-February because that's getting a total knee done. You're welcome. That was great presentation. Good evening Mayor and the Council. One-third Retail Rule on Central Avenue. After, as he said, the Northridge quake, Fillmore rebuilt this part of the town and it was a clear vision to protect the walkable retail district for residents and visitors.
Central Avenue was meant to be the place where people would stroll, browse shop, and experience the character of Fillmore. That vision didn't happen by accident. It required planning and guardrails. The one third rule is one of those guardrails. However, Central Advil is already struggling. We know that. We have multiple empty storefronts and fewer retail shops than it once did. But removing this rule will not fix that problem. In fact, it'll make it worse.
Right now we have already seen the trend of roughly 40 business storefronts on Central. A growing number are non-retail businesses with four real estate offices, a tax preparer, two gyms, the transit service, dentists and others. We just picked up a pest control on Central. These businesses may be perfectly legitimate and valuable, but they are not retail destinations. People don't stroll down the street to browse pest patrol or an insurance office. Those businesses often operate by appointment.
In other words, they benefit from the foot traffic created by retail businesses without contributing to creating that foot traffic themselves. If we remove the intrudal entirely, the market will naturally fill those empty spaces with the easiest tenants available – often offices or service uses. Once that shift happens, the retail ecosystem disappears. When the retail disappears so does the reason for visitors to walk the street. The idea behind this change seems to be that it'll help fill the empty storefronts but filling a space with anything available is not the same as building a healthy downtown district.
Cities across America try to create what we have here, and Fillmore is not short on places for businesses. According to SCE when they were here the other day there are 400 businesses across town. There are many other locations where services can operate successfully without replacing retail in the one place it was intentionally designed for it. At the same time, the City is working on something called Retail Strategies. An effort to strengthen retail in Fillmore. So the question is simple. Why weaken the very policy that protects retail while we're trying to strengthen retail? That sends a wrong signal about our long-term vision. Central Avenue is our front porch.
It says who we are, and that's where it's defined. Once it loses retail character, it will be very difficult if not impossible to bring that back. This decision deserves careful thought, not a quick fix for vacancies. I urge the council to protect the long-term vision of Central Avenue and reconsider eliminating the one third rule. The idea of filling in the shops is just shooting ourselves in the foot.
It's a weak fix. I would say go back, sharpen your pencil and write it so a company that wants to put in an entertainment space, that can go in. That's not retail but it would be like a place for kids or if it's an arcade or things like that. That is technically not retail but if we add in something like entertainment and you had event spaces, add that in as opposed to just saying oh, we're going to have 15 tax accountants or something.
Thank you, Eric.
Discussion? I like what I heard. Honestly, to me this is what the City Council is supposed to do. We're supposed to openly discuss with an open mind what exactly is the direction that the city needs to go and quite honestly I really want to thank both of you gentlemen for coming up and speaking because you both articulated very well the different positions and for me it gives me a lot to think about In my mind, I like what Eric said mainly about we don't have to be binary in just one or the other. Why can't we modify it so that we allow businesses that will fit into the mold that we want?
Because again, to me there are very few things that the city council has a huge impact on like this does. And I think we need to be very careful about our decision and not just say, well it's either this or that. What about other ideas? So in my mind, I think we need to go back and re-look at this again. I would recommend that we not make a decision tonight that I think we go back and give another look at, you know, another look.
I agree with you John. I was leading a certain way, but after hearing these two gentlemen talk they both made excellent points and I want to thank you. And that's why we encourage public speakers to come so we can hear what your opinions are and you both make two very valuable points. So I would be in agreement with Council Member Garnica that we wait, we hold off and maybe we could come up with a better plan of how we're going to tackle this issue.
1:12 – 1:1612 turns
What do you mean when you say hold off until what? What do you envision occurring, I mean what's going to change.
Well I think for me, the main point that Eric made about hey you know why throw out the one-third rule completely? Why can't we modify it to include certain businesses, certain venues like entertainment for example. That would be a draw because this goes back to what do we want the downtown to be and The one third retail was not because we wanted to be retail. It was because we want it to be a destination,
right?
So so if that's what we want, if the objective is we want downtown to be You know, things have changed since way back in the you know a few decades ago. Maybe entertainment venues are part of what we want to draw people in maybe there are other things that we could think of other types of businesses that we can think of that will draw people into the downtown area so it is a destination as opposed to just saying well retail is the way we're going to do it.
Yeah and I understand and I agree with a lot of what you're saying but I want to throw that question to our city attorney Do we have the ability then to say, we don't want these types of services but we will accept other types of entertainment businesses there? I mean how much leeway do we have on deciding who gets to move in and who doesn't. Well the
council has some discretion as long as there's a compelling government A state interest in allowing some and not allowing others. But now would be a good time to be workshopping it, to give staff as much direction as you can on how you'd like us to consider revising it or if it needs to go back to the Planning Commission. So not just put a pin in it but please discuss and provide input.
Okay, so then I guess we can open it up to what businesses do we want here then? And I agree 100% with what you're saying. I don't want to see it all turn into just insurance companies and whatever. Entertainment type businesses. So how do we articulate that? And what direction do we give the staff?
I guess if you don't mind, Mayor, I'm going to continue and kind of respond to that. I guess my idea would be to give direction to staff to say, hey, what are the types of businesses that will continue to make downtown Fillmore a draw rather than just say, well, you know what? We discussed entertainment so entertainment it is add that in. Right, I think that's getting too granular. I think it'd be better, we have some pretty impressive minds on staff that we can allow them to come back to us and say hey these are the types of things we've seen for example on High Street or these are the things we've seen in New Hall or other cities that have successfully drawn people in and not limited by our discussion to say it's only got to be A, B or C here.
I don't know Tiffany am I straying a little bit far from the direction?
Well no, that just puts a lot on staff. Because I mean you know in some cities they might have like an amazing ice cream store that brings in a lot of people but maybe in the small town like Fillmore that wouldn't work. Like so the more direction you can give us other than like put our creative better that would help us in drafting it.
Can I? Put one of our speakers on the spot and have him share his survey
results. Erica wants to say something though, I can see it. I want to make sure Erica gets a chance here.
I just want to remind the Council that, you know, like Tiffany stated it's best if you give us some parameters to work around because the last thing I want is to spend numerous hours doing research and then we come back and it's not what you would like to see. And then we go on this ever never-ending loop That we can't really close it. So, we brought this forward because back in...
Was it about a year ago? You know, Council Member Brogy had asked. We put it on the staff report. It all passed by all of you and then while I was on maternity leave, staff brought it back again. We went to the public hearing with the Planning Commission so we have spent I would appreciate if you could give us a bit more direct guidance so that we can come back with what you would like to see and do. Make sure that we're putting our energy and efforts in the right direction.
1:17 – 1:2216 turns
Do we want to bring up one of our speakers so he can repeat what he said? Not during.
Can I do that, would you mind? Can we
do that?
Yeah, come from the chair.
Yes, Eric,
can we invite you back up to the
podium please?
Share your survey. Or Sean. The question just came up, I just heard this question about what would really work. We don't necessarily want all entertainment. Whoever did the survey, both of you did the survey, both stand up there.
So I did two surveys through the Facebook community pages. One was formal, it was – the question was what businesses do you want in the downtown central area? The number one answer that came back was a coffee shop and I've also heard that beyond the survey people talking about is there a coffee shop. The next two, second and third place were often combined with a coffee shop but it was bookstore and ice cream store The next one down was non-Mexican food restaurant, which I have.
real interest in because as the owner of the theater, I would like a restaurant on Central that is open both before and after the show that people can easily go to. Now they are going to the Central Station on occasion depending on the time of the show. I encourage people to go to some of the other restaurants that are on Central. So if you take those top three, sometimes they were combined with each other. I went ahead and separated them out I did a second informal survey when I was at the theater running a movie. I walked out front, I took pictures of the buildings that had for lease or for sale signs in them that were around me and got the same kind of responses – coffee shop, bookstore, ice cream, non-Mexican food restaurant.
So somebody wants to move in that you guys are well aware of, a massage place. They come out of Goleta area. He said if one third retail goes through probably not or I don't want to speak for him but his comment to me was we might start looking someplace else to set up this other business. The other one had to do with baseball so it was kids entertainment and he actually approached city planning regarding that years ago. I don t know exactly when And was told about the One Third Retail, that conversation went back and forth for three or four minutes.
And then he walked out and said well I'm not going to do it. I encouraged him. I called him up and I said I think Run Third Retail might go away. Do you want to restart that interest? And then I gave him the name and number of one of the building owners that I think that particular business would fit in.
I think it would be worth it to do some research on other cities and how they've addressed the same thing. Sean and I have talked about this before, like what about an escape room? That's not one-third retail, you wouldn't sell anything in there but it's a place that people would go and they'd be entertained. What else will we come up with?
I wanted to do in the 340 building, which is the building next to the theater. I had approached the building owner about possibly doing some sort of children's entertainment thing. There are a lot of activities that are projection based. Projection on the floor, projection on the wall, they hit it, they throw a ball at it, whatever. They're simple and easy to put in and then there's other things that would fit in a store that size.
Sort of an in-between would be one of these pottery places. There's one in Santa Paula and you know it's not necessarily selling anything but it's So there's this sort of gray in between. I don't have to sell a thing or one third or 100% retail, but you could also entertain people with that sort of component and I've certainly been at enough tourist towns to see that's something that they do, at least in one little area. You know if you're going to Lanai or Solvang or Santa Fe there's like areas that are dedicated to just that kind of thing and so they must have codified it on some sort of rule and I'd be happy to research that kind of thing so he could use that language and he could add it in.
One thing that was in Jacob's report that I thought was interesting when I read through it is you know did Newhall and did Moorpark And one of the things that you pointed out, neither one of those did 1 third retail. And look where they're at today.
I'll throw that out there. Well, I noticed in Moorpark it's still very empty right now. It's all brand new! This is the kind of stuff that goes on a porch. I also noticed that Jacob had a few things in his report like grants and waiving permits and things like that, which this town is probably not big as Moorpark or Santa Cruz to have that kind of funding to give grants for shops.
City Council is approving more and more houses And people are complaining more and more, there's nothing to do in Fillmore. That's why I keep using that phrase experiential retail. I don't know if that's a real phrase or not. It just like one of those things that came out of my mouth and filtered. But anyway, experiential retail, I think is where it is at. We have plenty of retail that takes care of our basic needs on Central for the community. We have markets, we have these things that help the community. Now let's go that next step.
I just wanted to mention and Kevin Jacob Cruz
correct me if I'm wrong.
1:22 – 1:3013 turns
There was a comment made where maybe we could do more research. What I'd like to say is there was, from what I know from the work that Kevin and Jacob did, there was a lot of research that was done to put together this report. A lot of research on not just cities in Ventura County but cities outside. New Hall was mentioned. But in that research, we couldn't find one other city within the state of all those cities that we researched that actually have a 1 third retail requirement I think that's significant.
It is, and I think you would be able to say there are downtowns that we like to emulate and I think it's important to recognize that. Kevin am I wrong in saying that?
I've always said there's more than one way to skin a cat. So you don't have to have 1 3rd Retail as the requirement to create an active downtown. We can continue the research and find out what other cities have done. We can scrap the 1 3rd Retail, replace it with something else but make it active. But we are asking for you to provide us very specific direction. It sounds like you want to create something really, really active where you're not dominated by offices in passive use But entertainment is very active.
So Kevin, when you presented I think it was in August while I was gone? I had given you direction to look at all the other cities in Ventura County which I believe you did research. I have a vague memory watching it while I was holding my baby and I want to say that none of the other 10 cities that are in Ventura County have that requirement. Is that correct? None
of the cities in Ventura County, but we also looked at the Central Valley. They didn't either. No city. We've researched a lot of cities. There isn't any.
And I think that's what we wanted you to confirm, and we just wanted to bring that to the Council's attention. Thank you. Yeah, I think that's
a really good data point honestly. I mean because if...I was under the mistaken impression that this is a pretty common thing, that one-third retail...oh, we're not the only guys who do that but apparently we are the only guys who do that so... Okay, in that case that really changes my mind on the policy.
Yeah, I just whispered that too. Hearing that really changed my perspective on hearing this and we're the only city that does it
so...
And great presentation by the way and just chime in a little bit I feel like this is a great step for us to be more of a business-friendly city. You know, I hear it over and over from many different people here in Fillmore, people that are out of Fillmore that ended up moving to different cities to start their businesses because it was so challenging here in Fillmore whether it's what we're trying to pass today or just permits or other things that's going on that's preventing them from starting their business And so I'm very happy and pleased that all of you are coming together with staff, councils having conversations about what can we do to entertain the people that are coming into the city with Creekside and the new development that we're just talking down the street.
So I think this is a great, great start. It sounds like it's already been a start, so hopefully we can move down that path and make things easier for those who are trying to entertain us, to provide us with services and products here in the city of Fillmore.
And if we do say we want to eliminate the one-third retail, can we add? This is for you, Tiffany. Can we add in there, say, businesses that we can exclude? Because this is only for the downtown corridor. Say we don't want a dentist's office or more real estate offices because we already have those here. So those businesses are... Say we don't want X amount of our spaces filled with this many
Yeah, I mean for tonight. I would recommend that you consider adopting the ordinance before you to just remove the one-third retail since that's keeping some people out and then maybe look start studying other businesses because You might be surprised like how much foot traffic there is from a dentist cuz you're only there for an hour And then maybe you run other errands so maybe like some of the businesses like People who cut hair like maybe those are good draws for people to walk around and do other things versus something like an office where someone goes and sits for 10 hours and then leaves, and isn't having customers come in so I think you would not want to just address that tonight but really look into the future.
Yeah, a future evaluation and maybe that's even something you delegate to the Planning Commission to work on and recommend something about the types of businesses that not only the entertainment ones that you know will bring people but other types of businesses that you might not think about but they bring the foot traffic too.
And if I could pitch in mayor just a couple of comments. I think it's been a really great discussion and I'm in agreement with sort of, I think how we're shifting here on council and John you had mentioned, you know, I think you're pointing out that the destination Yeah, like that's important but like destination for different people. Right? So Fillmore ideally our downtown if we can have a mixture of destination tourists right people coming into experience Fillmore for a day for a weekend and also Knowing that they're downtown just locals, it's a destination for an afternoon of a cool experience or something on the weekend.
So I think just keeping that in mind that you know when we speak of the word destination, we're speaking to different populations that have the downtown destination for different reasons and I think if if we could have that diversity of reasons Beyond the office 10 hours you park your car, there's nothing coming. There's nothing selling, there's nothing coming and going.
I think that would be a main limit but we also just want to be careful not to limit ourselves too much, I think. And then just again speaking of sports and I think it was mentioned in Mr. Dello's building, As a sport parent, there is actually a business in Ventura, Red Line Athletics that kind of provides this inside gym experience. It's closing. For what reason, you know I don't know they're just not able to keep going but it's pretty big. It's pretty pricey and it's hard to get to for folks out here.
But I mention it because actually have heard from several different people who would like to do something locally like that here. Who would like to open something like that for The 600 plus AYSO, the footballs, so many basketball. We're such a young town if you look at our demographics we're so youth and that's another thing too I think as we maybe move forward and we look at further limitations or draws or incentives whatever we wind up doing more policy wise in this whole realm.
Who are our demographics? Who do we want to bring into town right? But also who is here and what are they looking for? Thank you. I'd like to
say two things regarding this.
1:30 – 1:4322 turns
One is regarding the limitation of businesses. Maybe look at Ojai who's limited so there are no corporate businesses on their main street, so that is something that has been done. They're not allowed to have anything that's a major chain. I believe the only exception is the gas stations which are already grandfathered in. So that's done. AI says one-third rule generally refers to a specific type of urban planning or zoning requirement imposed by city governments regarding new developments, particularly high density areas. This mandate requires that designated percentage often 30% to 33% in ground floor spaces and new mixed elements be dedicated to retail or commercial use. So it's not uncommon. Maybe this isn't done in Ventura but that doesn't make it wrong.
Thank
you.
I'm ready to make a motion.
You're ready to make a motion? Okay what's your motion?
That we approve the first reading to introduce ordinance number 26-992, removing the one third retail requirement from the central business district core. We have a motion, is there a second? We need to read the full title of the... Thank you. Oh so we need to open the public hearing and everything or no this was a public hearing right? Yes.
I can take over Don if you'd like me. Okay, so I will make it a motion that we adopt ordinance number 26-992 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 25-03 an ordinance of the City Council of the city of Fillmore California removing the one third retail requirement from section 6.04.0615.3D of the Fillmore Municipal Code.
Motion? Is there a second? I'll second. All in favor? Aye Okay, any opposed? And motion passes unanimously. Thank you.
Moving on to item number 10, city manager verbal report.
Thank you, Mayor. Manuel is going to provide a
quick update on the ERF grant.
Mayor, members of the council. Our case management staff is back to work and they've been visiting the encampment site with the help of the Sheriff's Homeless Liaison Unit They've been able to touch base with, you know, encampment dwellers that they haven't been in touch with before. So they're making some progress there and making sure that they're meeting everyone that's down there.
They continue to bring them services and things that are – that they are in need, helping them get connected to cell phones so they can actually communicate with Is there any change to the population in terms of quantity or makeup? The homeless we did the point-in-time homeless count in January and I want to say that number was approximately an increased mayor via seniority or a councilmember visa nor if you recall, I think the number that we ended up with was 13 that we counted um that day but
I think actually, you know what? I don't want to speak. I think it was a little bit higher. It was in the high teens. I think it was 17 or 18. I think we observed 13. I'm sorry, we were able to do surveys so the physical person surveyed with us and then we did five observational where the person was there. We saw them and we just observed them and marked them as living in the encampment. So I wanna say 17 or 18 total.
At that number, I would say the number is consistent with the count that was given, that was reported back in February of last year. So it's, I think it's staying stable yet. Yeah, just to, I think that's a good point that City Manager Eric Rivera mentions that the numbers that I'm guessing at are unofficial numbers. The homeless count has not been published as of yet.
Thank you. Sure.
Thank you, Manny. Joe's going to provide a brief update on Well 10 and then the completion of the sewer project on C Street. So
handing it over to you. Thank you. Good evening, so the Well 10 project is going great. Yesterday we started reaming out or I'm sorry cleaning up the site and doing the gyro survey. I don't know if you recall but when the conductor pipe was installed there was a bit of concern that I expressed that we might be off A degree and a degree when you're going over a long distance might be too much, and may cause problems with the installation of the well. So I asked the contractor to do a gyro survey of the conductor pipe itself. This is the top 60 feet of the conductor, and it turned out Good. The deviation wasn't significant, there was a deviation but it wasn't significant to cause us some issues or concern at this point.
So that was completed yesterday and they started with clearing out the backfill that they put inside the hole to keep it from collapsing on itself during the period where we wait for materials and stuff to come in. This evening, this afternoon as a matter of fact they started on the reaming process and that's anticipated to last until Saturday. Based upon how the pilot hole went we should anticipate delay so I'm estimating early next week When we did the pilot survey, or the pilot to whole, it went over by a couple days. There was some mechanical failure that was involved so I'm estimating a few more days than what they're anticipating.
So what's a reaming process?
The reaming process is, so you have a 17-inch pilot hole. So they have this drill bit that goes down and makes a pilot hole 17 inches approximately wide. And the reaming process to get to our desired width or our desired pipe size, they go down with larger and larger drill bits. And they ream out the hole. They make it bigger. So after the reaming process is done, then the contractor will begin on the well construction. We'll put down the casing, the screen, everything. And then we'll backfill around it with that gravel pack So everything is currently ahead of schedule, which is great. This is unfamiliar territory that we're in right now and it feels good but there's potential for things to roll over.
The current anticipated date for everything to be done is May 1st so that means the construction of Well 5 and the completion of Well 10 drilling and then we get into the structure around the well, which I'll be coming in a few council meetings to ask for your acceptance of the plan specifications and the estimate, engineer's estimate, and authorization to advertise the project for competitive bidding.
So that's about it on Well 10. We are done with the C Street sewer project. That went really quick, much quicker than we had anticipated. The contractor got in there and got things done. They will have to return on Friday to put in permanent striping and signage on the pavement And then they'll have to return sometime in May timeframe to install the lids over the manholes.
So we require a specialized lid for our sewer and storm drain, it mimics the city's logo or the city's image so That's a unique characteristic to our city, so we're kind of proud of it and we made them reproduce those. So actually I think they're imported from India if I'm not mistaken. So there is a little bit of a long lead time on that one. The signing is striping and the new lids won't require any closures more than 30 minutes So it'll be more or less a rolling closure when they do the signing and striping this Friday.
So we're proud of it. Any questions? Thank you, Joe.
Moving on to the street maintenance report, over the last two weeks the Public Works crew has been able to continue with pothole filling. So the week that we had the council meeting which was February 24th there were 178 potholes filled and this past week we had 120. There sometimes are fluctuations because we have other projects that take priority such as like Main water line breaks and so on. And so staff is still doing an outstanding job on juggling those, and making sure that we're making progress. So the total year-to-date potholes that we've been able to fill since January to current, we are at 786 potholes.
And then just remind the community that we are in the process of publishing our spring newsletter. We're just wrapping up the last details and just remind everyone to please sign up to our newsletter to keep updated with Everything that's happening behind the scenes. We have a lot of Projects and we're just providing updates and that concludes my presentation
Thank you. May I ask questions? Sure. Yes, thank you. I think a question on the potholes are they basically all over the city Or is there a particular concentration? They're
all over the city and so staff is like selecting the areas and moving along. And one of the things that, you know we've been having internal discussions this first round seems a lot because we haven't proactively been doing that but I feel like once we've covered All the areas will just be more of a maintenance, you know after storms. Just doing a quick checkup or you know if we receive a report from a constituent going out there We do anticipate that it's gonna last longer because we're no longer doing the temporary filling now that we have the new equipment and so when I provide you via email those updates That's why I reference the Actual locations that have taken place. I am working with Angel our senior management analyst so that when we publish the new newsletter It will contain that information So that the residents know the areas that have been covered and also the total number of potholes that we've been able to fill
Thank
you All right, then that brings us to our adjournment. So I will adjourn this meeting to our next regularly scheduled meeting on March 24th at 630 here at Central City Hall.