BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 January 28, 2020

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:0617 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction0:17

The Ohio City Council to order. Will the clerk please call the roll?

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 2
Show transcript
Mayor Johnston, here. Mayor Pro Tem Blance, here. Council Member Francina, here. Council Member Haney, here Council Member Weyrich, here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈18s recited, not transcribed
GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction0:28

Okay we have a quorum and welcome everybody yeah another fun night at city hall okay let's see who should we Ryan would you lead us in the pledge?

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction0:58

Okay approval of the agenda are there any changes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:05

I Want to suggest that any items that are more just business be moved to the end that are not so So much interest to the public and I may be wrong in that

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:17

okay, well the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:18

thinking like The fire issues the chapter 9 fire hazards

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:24

Why don't we do it the other way around, Susie? If those who are present and based upon the cards were receiving. We've got like at least ten cards interested in this about the safe streets issue so is there any any issue with moving that up to the head of the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:43

And Mayor, I just would note that I'll be pulling Kay from

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:45

consent.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:46

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47

I was going to move that we move the ATP meeting to another date.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:51

That's what I was gonna do. We got ten people here? Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:55

They're not they're not here. They were all waiting for the 930 bell to ring because that's where it was on number eight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:03

Could we have a special meeting? Is that what you're suggesting?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:07

With ten people here, they're going to want to speak. They're not here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:13

No, they dropped their cards off and are coming back.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:17

Oh great!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:18

They wanted to sit for two-and-a-half hours.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:22

So what's your pleasure? Is it to continue the matter so people will know? Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26

It is a big presentation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:29

May I make one comment about that?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:31

Okay, Bill.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31

There is one issue there Randy on the truck management plan And that is something that is holding up more projects than just the ATP. Now maybe if that's causing a problem for staff to further hold up the truck management plan, I just want to ask the question.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:49

Yeah, that one is Caltrans requesting it for a number of projects so that was one that has some time sensitivity to it but that can be done without talking about the full ATP project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00

Could that be done under city manager discretion? That's only $15,000? Yeah we could do that. And then we just continue with the city manager signing the contract.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:07

Okay, so is there any change in the order of the agenda? Do we need a motion to continue the major presentation and do I have a motion to continue that matter so people can be...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:19

Move the ATP item number eight to the second meeting date in February.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:29

I want some clarity on that. I thought we were going to have a special meeting, what's the difference between tonight and the next crowded agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:39

Well hopefully...

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:41

Well if we're gonna trail the thing, if we go to the next meeting you know you said the second are you saying the second Tuesday or the second meeting? The second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:47

meeting in February.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:48

Okay that puts it all away a month away then right okay is there a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:51

second? We

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:54

don't have a second to the motion so don't worry yet about it but is there a second of that motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:59

I would second if the motion could be amended to include City Manager discretion to execute numbers three and four.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction4:04

Yes. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:07

so we got... okay,

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction4:08

Susa, what do you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:09

want? I am not comfortable to support that unless I know that Greg... it won't delay Greg Grant. You know there's time sensitivity, there's issues. Okay let's ask the question of the

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:19

city manager. Yeah, there is some time sensitivity. Is there any opposition to that first meeting in February? Okay so the

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction4:29

motion then is to move that item The first meeting in February and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:43

could that be at the beginning of the agenda then since we're carrying it over That's

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction4:48

quite possible. And we could even do that during the meeting when we get there for some reason as

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:52

well I think I think I would support the answer is yes Because otherwise people have to wait and wonder yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:00

okay proceed with three and four right?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction5:03

Okay, is there any objection to the motion then of moving this to Tuesday the second Tuesday February And we'll put it at the head of the general agenda. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:15

So I have another question The people that wanted to speak on this tonight they could still speak under unscheduled items

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction5:23

They have a right to speak on any topic under

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

public comment if they wish

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:27

okay

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction5:28

Hopefully they won't do it twice or three times but okay. Can we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:31

make sure, I mean do we need to talk to Greg about whether there's any other because we were on a pretty tight timeline some other issues on this? Yeah. I mean I just don't mind moving it as long as we know we're not causing any problems later.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call5:43

Yeah, the truck management plan where the items that were critical. I want to make sure

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:49

of it. Because there was all kinds... If this compiles, I know we had some weird deadlines. It's a report. I think it's a

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction5:56

progress report. Okay. All these good people will be waiting most of the evening if we don't kind of come to a conclusion. Our city manager says that if we move it to the first meeting in February that they can work around the deadlines.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:09

Did you say that? Okay. Alright, thank you.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction6:12

Okay, you said that. Has anybody...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:13

And at the beginning of the agenda?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction6:16

Yes we've said that. We've said that too. You're clear. So with those clarifications is there any concern now can we okay so ordered where we will move on now And Bill, you said you were going to pull one item from consent?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:33

Yeah.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction6:34

K. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:34

have kind of a housekeeping question on

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction6:36

K. OK. So the public knows that that matter is going to be pulled off the consent agenda and dealt with.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed6:45

And I wanted to pull L.

0:06 – 0:2132 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction6:49

OK, so it's K and L. With those changes, is the agenda approved? Yes, no objection. Okay so ordered okay we have a presentation I believe that our next The presentation we do is David in the audience ah there David Maron from the Civic Alliance an old colleague and friend from many years of public service and his mother before him

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:25

I

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated7:25

remember him from before.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction7:26

Yeah, thank you David for coming up and doing this for us.

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated7:29

You're welcome and some of you know me from the League of Women Voters running the forums for some of you. You had to endure that from me before so thank you. Are you doing that again? I will be in the fall. Now that you've gone to districts we'll see how it all works out. Well, good evening to the audience to council staff. My name is David Marin I'm with a Ventura County Civic Alliance and what I'm going to do is take you through a presentation of the report and Gail is passing out copies and for the audience I did bring some extra copies if few people want to pick it up It's also available online at civic alliance org So the Ventura County Civic Alliance is a regional organization that looks at issues common to the 10 cities, tries to look at the business perspective, the economic, the environmental and the social equity.

And we produced this report. We distribute it for free around the county. This is Little feedback there, but One of the things we can't do this without the support of our sponsors So organizations like the community to foundation the Community College District era energy AT&T Channel Islands University Cal Lutheran University and the County of Ventura House Automation Lima Nara and Montecito Bank are some of our larger sponsors We're grateful to them for their help I'm gonna try to get through this pretty quickly and answer questions But one of the things I wanted to point out is that The key statistics show that Ventura County is getting older. In the year 2009 or 2000 our average age was 34, now our average age is up to 37.5 and right here if you look at Ojai's population you can see that 20.7% of our population in Ojai is under 18 That's OK, but you also have 22% over the age of 65.

And you could compare that to how the other cities look. So Ojai is an aging city. Can I interrupt

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction9:28

you for just a second? We're getting little feedback. Is there something we can do about that?

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated9:34

What? Jeremy said I should start over. No. OK. I'll stand a little further back, Jeremy. Agriculture, as far as Ventura County just continues to be an important part of our economy. About $5 billion industry and I'm sorry 2 billion industry 4% of the local economy. And we ship goods all around the world. Avocados, lemons United States sends it to Canada, to Japan a lot of information. We also have a growing organic industry here in Ventura County You're elected officials so I always like to share the information on registration. This is countywide going back to 2000, you could see that the registration for Democrats has stayed about even all of these years. But the Republican registration has declined over the years from a high of 42 down to about 29.

And that's because more people are registering as no party preference, the green color. No party preferences come at the cost of Republicans in Ventura County and that's why it's now becoming much more blue here. City by city, here is Ojai. Registration in Ojai about 48% Democrat, about 22% Republican and over 30% is no party preference so really in Ventura County no party preference is the second largest party as far as registration One of the things that there's a big effort going on in Ventura County is the nonprofits trying to raise the amount of philanthropy around the county. This shows the amount of per capita giving from different counties, Ventura County is on the bottom about $2500 annually.

Los Angeles, Santa Barbara much higher than us statewide average. There's a lot of questions about that maybe people are donating but they're sending it away to organizations outside our community so in the future you'll start hearing about a program called live here give here encouraging people to support local nonprofits In the economy, Ventura County has come back from the Great Recession. This shows the number of people that are working. Often we hear about the unemployment and at the very low unemployment rate. What we're showing here is actually the number of people that are employed and really it took from 2009 to 2017 to get back to where we were in 2007. So we are growing but not significantly.

And one of the important things is where those jobs are. And I know here in Ohio you can't do much to bring in manufacturing industries and high-tech companies, but the growth in jobs since the Great Recession has been in lower paying industries. So groups like leisure and hospitality they've seen a lot of growth that blue bar there is the one that represents pre recession so that's come back But if you look over here it's a manufacturing. This is pre recession, and it hasn't come anywhere near close same with construction big decline high paying jobs like finance and information very low so.

This is not just local, this is somewhat of a national issue transforming from a goods producing industry to a service producing industry. The problem is the manufacturing jobs are the high paying jobs. The jobs where we're growing are low paying. They're entry level and this is a problem for all of our electeds to look at around the county Gross economy, so the green line here is showing the county's average product. We're flatlining, we've been flatlining for a long time. That's good that we're not going into recession but other areas in the state and the nation are going really gangbusters and we're not. That's just a reflection of all these issues, housing, older population, low paying jobs.

I'll move on to education. This is showing the decline in student enrollment, the blue line is the K-8 and green is the high schools. I talked earlier about aging of Ventura County well this puts it into graphic detail what we're seeing is less families having less children and so the decline is going to start hitting the schools. I know that the Ojai School District is actually declining. The top line there is from 2009, about 10 years ago and the green on the bottom is 2017-18 and you can see that decline in the number of students here in Ojai Valley or Ojai Unified School District so definitely an issue we need more babies Land use and housing, it's very expensive to live here in Ventura County. This shows it by city.

The real number up here is the $2,089 is the average rental rate for a two-bedroom apartment in Ventura County. I think all of us old timers remember when that was our mortgage payment. Now that is the apartment rate. This breaks it down by city. You can see the various cities. Santa Paula Fillmore happened to be on the low end. Higher end is Thousand Oaks so what that means You graduate the university, maybe you get a job working in Thousand Oaks but you can't afford to live there so you decide to live in Santa Paula where the rent's cheaper. You spend more time on the road. You're away from your families. All of these things are interconnected.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed14:56

Could I just ask? So Ojai is actually according to this More affordable in terms of average monthly rent than Simi Valley, Camarillo, Moorpark and Thousand Oaks? Yes. For

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated15:08

a two-bedroom apartment. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:09

I was just curious about it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed15:11

But that says Ojai Valley. Is that obviously a wider...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:14

It's not Ojai City.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed15:15

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:15

said Ojai

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed15:15

Valley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:16

Yeah, it does say Ojai Valley. Okay, I guess it's a little surprised at how much lower

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:22

yes

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated15:26

No apartments only in that example two-bedroom apartment two bedroom apartment Natural and environmental sources, Ventura County is a wonderful place to live. I think that's why we're all here the Ojai Valley is spectacular We have the beaches the mountains Our ocean water quality is good here in the area air quality is good. I like to show this one about solar capacity so the blue is the amount of previous solar capacity but the overall bar chart shows you the growth in in solar capacity in Ventura County, and we are now at a point that just people from their homes and businesses with solar is equal to about a third to a half of the Edison energy generating station out there in Oxnard. We've replaced that much capacity with solar here in Ventura County.

So I'm sure for those people who don't like energy plants, that's great news. Public health, just there's a lot of interesting data when you have the chance to read this and you don't have to read start to finish. You could jump around. The data was researched by California Lutheran University Dr. Jamshid Damoui. It was written by Tony Biasati. We have all of the sources in the back so if you're interested in any of this data we give you the websites where you can drill down. This chart is showing teen substance abuse for the major unified school districts The data comes from a survey given to high school juniors every year. And we actually include the actual survey question here so you can see what the kids were responding to. I love the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:00

questions!

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated17:01

Yeah, and there are a lot more. You can visit this website. There's an amazing amount of information but you could see Ojai there in the middle pretty high on the number of kids talking about being drunk or high seven or more times. I think we're looking at over 20 percent for Ojai. Ventura Unified is up there But it is something of an issue here in Ojai.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:22

Yeah I was being, I wasn't meaning. When I said good, I like the questions, I meant they're disturbing.

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated17:30

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:31

it's... They're revealing and that's good. Yeah,

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated17:35

we assume kids are just playing Instagram when they're actually doing a lot more. This one shows teen mental health on the top. It's showing the number of kids with chronic sadness and on the bottom the actual number of contemplated suicide within the last 12 months so pretty much across the board. We are seeing declines, that is positive In many of the districts, but you can see that even in Ojai we are having a problem with some mental health issues.

It's certainly not your purview but for the audience and others I'd like to share that. I know I'm running out of time Mr. Vague I'll try to finish this up. Opioid deaths major problem in Ventura County 85 people in 2017. This contrasts it with other counties In the area of public safety, Ventura County continues to be one of the safest counties in the state. This is a chart of the top 15 largest counties in the state. Ventura County is the second lowest crime rate across the board. So that's great news and it's been that way for a long time. This breaks it out by city. Ojai has the distinct honor of being the city with the lowest violent crime rate The overall crime rate is third for Ojai. Moorpark is the champ in the overall rate, and Ventura has the highest crime rate so Chief you could go talk to Mr.

Corny about that. Social services homelessness continues to grow. The green bar there is veterans. We do break it out by city, it's a little hard to see but Ojai was showing 47 in 2019. I know you are focused probably laser-focused on this issue so I won't add much but it is here where you could see the other cities. Transportation would continue to have a lot of people driving a long distance to get to work And wildfire, we did include a special thing in the report as far as the Thomas fire showing about $1.4 billion of damage from the Thomas fire and we contrast that with the Woolsey fire 388 million or billion dollars worth of damage. Most of Woolsey was in LA County and that's not reflected in this chart. This is just the Ventura County portion.

Woolsey Fire was about four billion dollars of total damage and one that I I don't have but it is in the chart, is the air quality that I think you all want to look at because it shows just how bad the air quality got in the Ohio Valley. During the Thomas fire you can see the decline over the days. Very severe the number of people that were facing hazardous air quality during that time.

So, Mr. Mayor I'm at my halfway... No, I'm joking. I'm all done.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction20:13

We took up some of your time so I don't want to rush you off it's

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated20:16

really

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction20:16

important information to share with the public

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated20:19

Right. Again, it is available for anyone watching at home at www.civicalliance.org. We're grateful to all the sponsors and we're sharing this all around the county and happy to answer any questions.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction20:31

Okay. Our economist, Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed20:33

Quick question on some construction recovery. If you take out the fire-related permits that are finally starting to flow and the construction purely related because of the construction rebuilding from the fire, do you have any sense of how big a factor that is in the construction recovery? I mean it might be overstating the actual underlying structural

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated20:57

increase. So the data in the report is 2017 showing the number of building permits And we did have a nice growth that went up to 2,565 building permits in 2017 which was 900 increase over the year before. As you all know building permits don't mean actual construction it's just the permit was pulled.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:17

But it's positive news

0:21 – 0:3329 turns

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated21:20

But if you think of Ventura County as about 800,000 people and maybe growth rate of 3%, that would be about 20 or 10,000 little more 20,000 people. And if you're putting three people in a home, you need like six 7000 homes for them to live in so We're not really doing much on the backlog. If

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:39

we're not against that, just the replacement that was built because of the fire?

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated21:42

Yeah and natural birth but yes I don't think the City of Ventura's new replacements are included in that because it was too late in 2017 for the fire they'll be in the later numbers great question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed21:59

Just browsing through this, it's fabulous. Thank you. It just gives such a great overview and I would like to have... Did you say you're leaving some extra copies? Mr.

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated22:09

Vega has some for the team right back there and I left some for the audience. They look like they're gone so maybe I'll take them with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:16

me

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated22:16

but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:16

now is your chance. What this is, it is an overview of the facts but how we interpret those facts is not part of this. And you know, and we can look if you look at this as far as the economy goes, we're going through such change it's like we need a whole new paradigm for the economy.

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated22:39

You're exactly right. In

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:40

the era that we're living in with climate change and everything else but thank you. This is

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated22:44

fabulous. The mission of the alliance is really to provide

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:47

unbiased

CommentDavid Marin I'mProposedself-stated22:48

information so policymakers like you and others can be informed and the audience as well Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction23:17

Okay, public communications we're almost to that point. We could start right now or do you want to go ahead and adopt the consent calendar with the two that we pulled off? I'll make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:29

a move that we approve A through J.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction23:36

Okay Many objection to the motion to approve. Okay, so ordered So we'll go ahead and start our public comment and I have five cards but because We're no longer dealing with the safe street issue tonight Someone if anybody has something that can't wait till the meeting in February you would have an opportunity to speak under public comment Jeff Thank you. Okay, Jeff and Joan Kemper's on deck.

Good evening.

CommentJeff OtterbeinProposedself-stated24:16

Yeah my name is Jeff Otterbein thank you okay it's good to be here I would like to express my gratitude for the meeting that happened on Saturday at Nordoff High School, the committee meeting that allowed all the public to come and have some input into the climate emergency situation. So I was glad to see several of you here there also and that is encouraging also But my Goal or Idea tonight is mostly to speak about the emergency part of this climate situation.

You all were agreed in declaring this an emergency, and so I'd just like to say a few words about what that means to me. An emergency is something that takes our attention and our resources, and focuses it directly on the subject being global warming. So when I see the way we work through things as being more or less business-as-usual, meaning that We take some information, we give it to a committee. They pass it on to another committee. Next week they'll look at it and pass it on.

I think for example in Australia during this fires the fire department and the people running the state of in Australia they didn't pass it onto next week and pass it onto next week. They looked at it said today this is what we have to do. This is an emergency And I would hope as much as possible, you all can take this as that kind of an emergency so that today you look at things and say what can we do today?

And if we need to pass something on to somebody else and say can you look at this. Can we insist that they do it today tomorrow then you know as soon as possible not look at it as something that we can wait for next week or next month. So the last thing is the bicycle situation that we just put off until February, that's just an example two weeks down the line I think is a great project but let's keep it all on forefront as much as possible. Thank

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction27:17

you so much. Thank You Jeff. Joan are you out there? Come on down, speaking to someone else who's devoted her adult life to helping. And I've got Brian Akins on deck.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed27:36

Good evening and thank you for letting me come to talk to you. I think all of you probably know that I do, or that I have a production company that does plays, stage plays two or three times a year. We raise all the money to fund the productions and each musical or play has a local non-profit as the ticket beneficiary. We give all the money away And we've been doing that for about 10 years. Our show this spring, this March is a wonderful, wonderful comedy prize-winning comedy Harvey.

Now many of you may have seen Jimmy Stewart do the movie. Harvey is ludicrous it's so funny. It's about a wonderful kind man who is very happy his confident and his dear friend is a six foot tall white rabbit And that rabbit lives with him and his sister, and that rabbit goes to the bars with him. Goes to play pinnacle at the firehouse. The rabbit is his main friend. And you might gather that does cause some consternation.

The play was opened in Broadway in 1944. We were at war then, as you remember the Japanese War did not end until 1945 and yet that play was an instant hit became the best play of the year because people needed to laugh. Anyway I think this will...I won't tell any more because I hope every one of you will buy tickets and come to this it opens March 27th at Matillaha And you all probably remember, this is Easter, pre-Easter. Three weeks before Easter this year.

A few years ago we had with a studio artist, we had the Easter egg thing and they decorated a lot of giant Easter eggs and so on that was decorating the town. Well, the studio artist has joined this production of Harvey and this is going to be the Easter of the rabbit. The Easter rabbit not the Easter egg. There'll be eggs too of course for the children to hunt So, I'm here to beg your forbearance with this. We would like to construct ten six-foot tall white rabbits. They would be dressed with a bow tie, a jacket, pants and we would like to place them around in various public places in Ojai.

About the middle of February through Easter and these rabbits would be smiling and they would be, you know just showing the way. They would help the Easter activities as well as a spring show And, for example, a concert in Libby Bowl Easter, the egg hunts, the activities with the meals, breakfasts, brunches, everything. These rabbits could be this way to the egg hunt in Libbey Park or the concert in Libbey Park. The Ojai Valley Inn has that thing and I think there's another Easter Egg Hunt planned at Soule Park. They could be directing people all over to the Sunrise Service.

In addition to standing around, your handouts show how we're going to construct these rabbits. They are 72 inches tall and 36 inches wide where their arms are or paws I guess I should say. Anyway, so we're going to make them out of recycled plastic, corrugated plastic. That's what the real estate people use for real estate signs. It's smooth on the outside so you can paint it And you can print on it, but the backside is corrugated and it is weatherproof. So these real estate signs in the middle, they're impervious to water or wind or whatever.

We'll brace those with 1x3s and some rebar so they don't fall over. Six foot does stand up. So we would like to, the charity that is the recipient of Harvey's ticket income is your neighbor, Help of Ojai. And they're very excited. I mean they want to have a six foot rabbit in their front driveway and they also want one at their store. So I know this is a little different but the chamber, I've run this by the Chamber of Commerce Jimmy Fleming and he's very excited because this could help the merchants. It could certainly help the restaurants with dinners and so on and the tourists. It could be a festive thing instead of eggs bunnies.

So I'm asking you to smile on this project and we're not asking for any money. We're just asking for your blessing

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction32:36

God bless you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed32:37

Thank you, thank you I needed

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed32:39

that. My granddaughters can't wait to see them. Pardon? My granddaughter's what can't wait to see them I'm sure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed32:45

Well maybe I could give her a preview. You

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed32:47

know

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed32:49

Joan just one more thing that you do for our community and thank you. Thank you pardon? One one more thing that you do for our community or have done or will do I just want to say thank you it's a great idea.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:00

Thank you Randy thank you

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction33:03

Okay, no action can be taken tonight because it's not on the agenda but I'm sure the city manager will... Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:09

I've sort of whispered this around shall we say.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction33:13

Right yeah okay and forbearance doesn't have any there's no evidence of it so

0:33 – 0:4534 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:21

So what would you like me to do? Do you want me to tell you as we get closer to the time? If we can be in contact. James, I'll be in touch with you. We can just make

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call33:32

sure that they're all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:32

appropriately

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call33:34

placed and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:34

everything. A detailed thing to you and to you too sir of course.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction33:38

Okay. That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:38

good.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction33:39

Thank you so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:39

much. Thank you so much.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction33:40

Okay thank you Joan. Okay Brian you're up and Ron McRae you're on deck.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed33:50

I'm here with my museum hat. You're going to see me another couple times tonight with that other hat. So the museum just finished the Christian Murti and Ojai exhibit. I hope you had an opportunity to see that at the exhibit opening, I think we had somewhere in the neighborhood of 280 people that showed up, not all on the same hall at the same time in case the fire chief is watching.

So that has been taken down we're in the process of putting up our new exhibit which is called 22 miles. We have a fabulous landscape exhibition that we can't wait to share with you curated by Jennifer Moses of Miner's Oaks and Gail Piddick of Santa Paula. The reason I say that is 22 miles is the distance between Jennifer's house in Miner's Oaks and Gail's house in Santa Paula. They asked their favorite Southern California artists to paint scenes from around the Ojai Valley, in both small and large sizes so look for the larger painting of the artist as well as a smaller painting of the artist. The results are stunning!

The location of the artists, quite a breadth of artists. The 21 artists in the exhibition are from Carpinteria, Cayucos, Los Angeles, Malibu, Ojai, Pasadena, San Juan, Capistrano, Santa Barbara, Santa Paula, Santa Coy, Sherman Oaks and Templeton. The opening exhibition will be this coming Saturday from 530 to 730. We encourage you to bring a friend, it's open we usually have delicacies however with 280 people showing up the last time if you want some food I'd get there early so thank you all very much. Thanks

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction35:31

Brian. Ron you're up and Diana Blanchard you are on deck.

PresenterRon McRaepickleball court you've got out hereProposedself-stated35:37

Did I pass out some of these? It's gonna fall. My name is Ron McRae, I live in South Ventura Street down the block here and I have a serious problem with the pickleball court you've got out here. I think there is a problem with the noise ordinance on that they go on every day Okay, I wanted to do this anyway. I wanted you to hear this anyways. This is right outside your door.

It goes on six days a week all day long. I don't know if he's noticed that or not but... This is outside your door across the street. This is from my house Down the street, it's right here. Every day when they play that I didn't know what this noise was until I walked over there and no one told me there was going to be a pickleball court over there. I hear that in my house. When I close the door and all the windows, I can still hear it's like a ping pong game going in my living room. It's serious problem for me and none of the neighbors over here have been told that was going to happen.

I think you should review that, maybe give them an option to put in their input. What I have here, I think they're in a violation of the sound, the noise elements. Ojai General Plan, November 1991. The underlining purpose of the noise element is to eliminate community exposure to excess noise levels. That's what that says on your thing there. This is your document about noise levels. This is excessive noise levels that you cannot go over in, according to your paper here, 55.2%.

This is Playtimes over there and they go over there from 8 a.m. Till noon, and then 3 p.m till dusk Which is daylight saving time will probably be 7 or 8 o'clock at night and Saturday And they never stop that noise I think it just there's no nope It's done doesn't stop This is a document that I sent in two weeks ago to complain about the noise. I haven't heard anything back from anybody. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do.

The people playing this could actually have several other places they can play, One last thing I wanted to show you here is this is a transfer disclosure statement. I've been a real estate broker here, and I've lived in this town right across the street there for 30 years. I'm a real estate broker, and this is a transfer disclosure statement here that gives out everybody sells a house. You have to give this transfer disclosure to somebody And it says right here at number 11, neighborhood noise problems or other nuisances. You've got to give that to them and if that is a noise problem or a nuisance, it's going to affect the price of property right around here. That's for darn sure. So I would really like you to reconsider this maybe contact these people, the owners, the tenants and let them, even the pickle people, if you tell him That listen you're bothering people around here.

I think some of them might not if they knew that they probably wouldn't they go someplace else There's plenty other places to go but I Got a red light here, and then that's all I can say if you just look at that Documents there and let me know what if he could do anything about it

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction40:04

Thank you, Ron. And the city manager has a copy of it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:08

I know we can't deliberate but we can bring this up on either future agenda items or city manager report and discuss other specifics about this?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction40:18

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:19

Ron, I'll make sure we do that but we have to wait until the end of the meeting according to the rules of our meeting.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction40:25

Diana Blanchard? Is there a Diana out there? If not, okay that is the end of the public comment cards that I have. We missed anybody? Okay let us go to What is it, K? Is that the one? Yeah. K and L on the consent agenda. So K is the second reading of accessory dwelling units. Bill, you were there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:51

I just have a little housekeeping issue and that is that there is a deletion of the deed restriction language, I believe on page 10, attachment A page 10 of 14 which I completely agree with. And it's also noted in the staff report remove the deed restriction requirement for accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling My concern is that we make sure that we be fair. In other words, this is going forward no deed restriction after the effective date of this ordinance adoption but that still leaves in place the deed restrictions have been filed to date and just from a standpoint of fair treatment I would think that at least my, I believe, certainly intent as a council person is to have it apply to all.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed41:37

And Mayor, I would second that. I was gonna speak to the same thing Bill If there's a way to do that,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call41:44

I think there is. I think we'd have to bring an item back to do that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed41:47

separate

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call41:47

from this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed41:48

I think that could be done as direction here as direction is part of implementation of the state's new mandates regarding ADUs which do include in government code section 65852.2 sub G the power to go beyond you could direct its staff record the necessary documents to lift all past ADUD restrictions That would be within your power as a policy choice. So move, as part of my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed42:13

motion to approve this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed42:14

Matt, that would require the individual property owners to record new deeds though before it went into effect on their personal property?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed42:22

Well because right now the deed restrictions are recorded as covenants between the city and the individual owners for each of the ADUs. We could record a document on each title lifting that. Oh okay. And we'll figure out the mechanics exactly

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed42:34

but... That's cost effective yeah, that'd be nice.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction42:38

Yeah their comments

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed42:41

I'll second it.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction42:42

Okay, we have a motion and second Are you comfortable with that as the city attorney as far as it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed42:48

Power to do it the policy choices in your your realm and in terms of the mechanics, I think we would lift Record the right document on each title that has one from our records lifting it So they wouldn't be bound by the owner occupation requirements going forward and

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction43:02

City Manager year You're good with okay Is there any objection to the motion? If not, it's ordered. Okay let's go to letter L.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed43:15

First of all I've talked to a number of gardeners in the community and they're all willing to move forward on this two-cycle ban. You know they saw it coming You know, they're all concerned about the expenditures. But I've talked to them about there's a multitude of ways of doing this you got four months. You don't have to go out and buy 25 or $3500 worth of equipment at one time, you can phase through it. So some of the current concerns that came back to me were The biggest one is I've got this investment in all this battery equipment and most of the problems are not with the batteries, they're with the mechanical parts of it like a trigger or a handle or something that helps it move propels it.

And so their concern was how do we you know what do we do if that breaks? Because if I'm going to invest $700 in a mower I'm not gonna buy two of them I'm gonna buy one of them and hope you know and hope it lasts long So, one of the suggestions was that in the licensing registration or permitting aspect that if a piece of equipment goes down that they actually can come back to the city service yard or to the city manager however we choose to set that up.

And actually get out a free, get out of jail free card for a certain period of time. They come in and say we've sent this piece of equipment back for repair. We need to operate with the two cycle more until that piece of equipment comes back. So I'd like to figure out how we can do that. We can't necessarily make the manufacturers or the vendors that are selling this carry spare mowers, blowers, trimmers.

I think it would be an undue burden on that but I think if we can figure out how they can come back in through the registration process And notify staff and get a card or something so if code enforcement comes by and wants to cite them, they can say no I have a piece of equipment that's been turned in for repair. It's supposed to be out in six weeks and then come back. So you guys want to help me do that? I'd like just figure out how to put that in here as well as put back in the permitting and registration at this time so that we have a way to manage this problem.

0:45 – 1:0056 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed45:38

We're discussing this now because I don't know that I'm in favor of that. Some of these things can be handled if you're talking about a leaf blower for a driveway, it can be handled with a broom And the public can be educated not to demand such unrealistic cleanliness for their yard, you know. So that the burden is not on the gardener and I need to understand if equipment is broken how long does it take to fix it?

Are you talking about two weeks, a month? And I mean we're not talking about some emergency equipment. It's not an emergency equipment that we're talking about and I think it could get confusing because the public won't know are these people operating a gas powered leaf blower because the electric one broke. I'm not comfortable with the suggestion without understanding it better.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction46:40

Okay, well what's on the agenda right now is to adopt it as it's submitted and I think Randy is suggesting that it be amended. Is that what you're... Right. And so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed46:48

So I could help Councilman Frasina just... It just comes down to a cost factor that we're asking these community members to put forth a lot of expense. And what we're saying is we appreciate that, we value that, we recognize it and we're willing to work with you. Now, first of all, most of this equipment does not perform at the high mechanical speeds of power mowers.

So while I agree with you it would be great not to mow your lawn every week, sometimes that's a function of what that client wants. If you wait two or three weeks or four weeks or eight weeks in between mowings, you're going to put a tremendous amount of stress on that new piece of equipment. So I'm just saying there is a reason behind it and again these were the concerns I'm as concerned as you that someone might use it as a means to not use electric equipment or battery-operated equipment. I'm with you on that. That's why it has to be something that they take it to the, to a person who can recognize that it's been turned in for repair and that we allow that so I'm

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction48:02

We could go all night on it. We have a request, is it alright to continue this matter for two weeks and come back with either the both the obstacles as well as the potential solution? I'm willing to make a motion now if you'd prefer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed48:20

But I still haven't had my question answered, which is how long does it take to repair a piece of the grid? Well we aren't going to

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction48:27

know that tonight. That

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed48:28

would be what we were told. The reality is it's going to be different every time, so there's no constant... What I would...I will prop for a motion just so we don't have to continue another thing to another calendar date I'd say that I really understand what Mr. Haney was saying and I think that's only fair, especially for making people register and they're going to put this effort in.

Has broken down and is in for repair so that they be given a two-week allowance to have that back If they if they cannot get it repaired in those two weeks We'll make them have to come back to City Hall and reregister at that same information That forces them to come back every two weeks. It's eight weeks That's gonna force him to come back every two and then in order to get that equipment back into compliance They will have to show that they are no longer using the other equipment and that they're using the new equipment

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction49:17

Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed49:18

I'll second that motion.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction49:19

Okay, we got a motion to second bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed49:22

In terms of commenting on the motion, I am concerned about staff time from a code enforcement standpoint. That's what I was going

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction49:29

to say.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed49:29

It's a lot of administration. And also, I'd like to ask the question of Mr. Haney. To what extent do you think the rental market is going to step up and have more electric equipment available for rent for both people that only use occasionally and for this kind of situation where people need to have short-term replacement?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:50

Well, Greg Rents is the only rental yard in the valley. So we have one rental agency and if you've been to his shop I don't have a sense that he's going to be investing in a lot of this equipment. I've talked to Eileen at Aquaflo that is selling Husqvarna and she had the same concern as I asked her to reach out to Husqvarna. I don't know if Husqvarna is gonna give her spare mowers, blowers, edgers. That's something that they're gonna have to agree to and if they can then if you own a Husqvarna, you'll go there and get it exchanged while something's being broken. You'll have to take it back to a dealership anyway for repair.

And that's the other thing. This is all new equipment. This is all something new that we're doing moving forward. And some of this equipment's available at Home Depot, some is at Lowe's, some is at Ventura Rental or I'm drawing a blank on their name right now. But the interesting thing is guys we're trying something new and if we're not willing to work with these people to figure out how to best do it then what we're gonna do is just create more chaos and that's why...I'll take this back two weeks

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed51:03

Randy, I want to say we're going to create more people that aren't going to comply with our rules if we don't make them enough flexibility to have it put in place. And we are moving quickly and this is a very aggressive thing that we're doing where the one community that's adopted some of these rules or some of the only ones were the only cities that have adopted all these I just can't imagine it's going to be so significant that it's going to deal with staff so significantly to really bog them down. But here's the deal, I'd rather sacrifice our staff time for the betterment of this climate emergency that we're talking about than sacrifice not having some ability to get people compliant with this where they're frankly if their equipment breaks down versus them coming in and having two weeks to do it, they're just gonna use the other equipment hope they don't get caught.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed51:43

Well, the other point I want to make on this is that would it be better to have this handled by a resolution regarding rules rather than trying to amend the ordinance for rules like this? In other words, does this guy think it has to be codified or is it something that ought to be referenced in simply

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction52:01

regulations? That's a question for the city attorney.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed52:04

Either is options. I understood Mayor Pro Tem Blatz's motion to be not something to add to the ordinance, but rather direction on administration and implementation to the city manager You could certainly codify that if you wished or you could create right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed52:18

I would I would be happy with it being a policy versus a policy too

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call52:22

I will say last meeting it was approved with the, I believe there was a request to come back within those 90 days with some regulations and programs in place so we can still come back with those.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed52:35

And I just want to point out that a lot of these tools can be replaced with non-electric or non-gas And we're not promoting big lawns in the city. We're trying to get people to let their lawns go

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction52:50

and... So when it comes back, you know, we'll debate the merits of the ordinance or the resolution right now this is just a modification Trying to figure out how to phase it in until we get some kind of idea what the reliability of equipment is I don't know that we've had a big problem with our equipment but We've actually gotten a little more aggressive and expanded what we're doing. So, okay is there...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed53:11

One last question or one last comment Mayor. So I did study this. I looked at six manufacturers of this equipment and I'm going to provide that information to you James so that we can post it. You know six different values on mowers in general starting from $300 going all the way up to $800 Backpack blowers the same thing starting at $399 going all the way up to eighteen hundred dollars So there's a big Flex that there's a big area of costs here. And so again, I just like to just be clear on that James it I'll give you that information and we just want to be able to work with these people That's what we want to do to make this to make this work out.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction53:55

Well, okay Do we have clarity on what your motion is now Ryan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed53:58

Yeah, it's dead in the water I think? No. Are we voting or are we going to bring it back?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed54:03

It's a motion to approve with regulations to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed54:05

adopt. Yes and when you bring back the regulations will include that.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction54:11

Okay James are you clear? Okay it'll be back in two weeks. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed54:15

I'll make one last point. The more flexibility we show also means the more rigid we will be with anyone out there who breaks these rules. You're going to get reported we're gonna continue to find you We're trying to change this significantly. Don't think about this as us being weak, think about this as being flexible so we can enforce even more.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call54:32

I just want to make sure, I am clear. So it's not being continued for two weeks? No we're approving it now with the regulations coming back within this.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction54:40

Okay so what you know then I got to be sure I've given Sousa the right idea when the regulations come back for how will be enforced that will be debatable. Right and I was aiming for February

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed54:51

25th.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed54:53

It's adopted tonight

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction54:54

well if we have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed54:55

a majority vote yeah

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction54:57

okay so are we ready for a vote

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed54:59

yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed54:59

So we're not, there's no... Right now we're not saying that if your electric mower breaks that you can use a gas pump.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call55:08

No. That will be part of the regulations that come back in a future meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed55:12

That we will debate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed55:13

You've got more weeks to prepare.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed55:17

I'm going to prepare! We're approving

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed55:18

the ordinance to go

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction55:19

forward. Okay are we ready for vote?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed55:22

The customer needs to bear some of the

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction55:24

burden. Sousa, are we ready for a vote? Yes. Okay, let's have the vote then.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Mayor Pro Tem Blatts? Yes! Mayor Johnston? Yes Council Member Weirich? Yes Council Member Haney? Yes Council Member Francina? Yes

Okay, we are now on item number two public hearing recommendations of the council to designate the Ojai Playhouse Theatre as a City Historic Landmark Number 26. Is there any staff introduction or is that?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call55:53

Yeah just a brief introduction. So this item is a, as you mentioned, a public hearing to discuss landmarking the Playhouse Theater. There is a thorough and substantial report from Provenience Group included with the agenda and it notes that the theater is the oldest operating theater in Ventura County and it has a lot of interesting information like an advertisement for a 1914 showing of a movie called The Valley of the Moon The HPC chair is likely here if questions are asked.

HPC considered the matter at their July 11th meeting and then their January 9th, 2020 meeting. Took public testimony, heard evidence, received the report and found that the... recommended that the Playhouse Theater be landmarked as City Landmark Number 26. The report has a lot of information, including it notes that the theater is currently for sale and noted that there was a stipulation at the time it was prepared to keep the business as a movie theater. So there were no issues with landmarking at that point. The report also notes that it's eligible for designation not only as the City of Ojai Landmark but in the California Registry and National Registry. With that, the HPC recommended that council approve it as landmark number 26 for the City

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed57:34

And also a waiver they recommended.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call57:36

Right, and the waiver of application fees was also recommended for work that would go along with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed57:44

Yes

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction57:45

Okay ready to for the hearing to be open? Okay, we'll open in the public hearing and I have two cards Brian Aikens You warned us didn't you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed57:58

You'd be back one more after this So again, you're

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction58:03

on deck

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed58:04

so chair the Historic Preservation Commission. I want to thank Councilman right why raking councilwoman Francina who ward attendants at our historic preservation commission meeting? It's nice to have you there To hear what we were talking about that night We did discuss this we have I as a Means of declaration. I also was in a meeting with Joe Ness as part of the city and meeting with Tanya and Tobias back in mid-october As we were trying to get information on what this means and to each of the parties involved And so that was a good meeting. I think it took us forward the gist of the meeting was that the The theater is kind of in a unique position because it not only Has the historic nature to it, but it also has In part of financial benefit to the city as being an operating museum.

So we those are the one things I'm a financial guy take those things in mind and But also because it's so important, because it's so central to the location. Because again of the history that's approaching with this and keeping in mind that Processes are taking place between with the family regarding this property the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously approved approved the wish that The fees would be waived again. This is a beneficial multi-beneficial property We would love to see it you heard it was the oldest Right behind my back is Craig Walker who is the history guy in case anything comes up on that but And then also, it was important that we as a Historic Preservation Commission committed to this but also that the council work together with the owners in the process in going forward as a part of this designation.

We see it as a wonderful partnership between us as the Historic Preservation Commission, yourselves as the representatives of the city and Tanya and Tobias who are here representing the owners of the property. So thank you very much.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:00:26

Thank you Ryan.

1:00 – 1:0610 turns

PresenterTanya Parkerour family today we would like to first sProposedself-stated1:00:34

Good evening, I am Tanya Parker. I am Claude Alouard's daughter and Walid Alouard's niece who are the owners of the property so i'm here representing our family today we would like to first state that the Alouard family has every intention of keeping the Ojai Playhouse a working movie theater due to sensitive negotiations were unable to say what our plans with the businesses inside the building are at this time But we wholeheartedly agree with the Commission's purpose of maintaining the look and feel of downtown Ojai, and maintaining the historical facades and buildings that are here. We feel it is an important part of the town's charm and character and its cultural heritage.

As the owners and operators of the theater for the last 37 years, we are in full support of the Commission's plan to designate the outside of the theater building As stewards of this building for nearly four decades, our family has been committed to maintaining its significance both in the look of the building but also as one of the appealing features of downtown Ojai along with the post office, the Oaks and the arcade and also providing a movie theater to our community.

The family did not seek this designation, rather the city brought it to us and at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting we did ask for a delay on the designation of the front facade. And as we are now currently and actively moving forward with reconstruction. We do not wish to have any encumbrances on this building due to landmark status during this process.

With our limited funds and resources, we do not want to incur any potential additional expenses or delays going through the Historical Commission's Approval process and so we do accept the commission's recommendation to the council to move forward with the designation With the recommendation to waive permitting fees associated with the landmark status Though it may not appear. So at outwardly We have been working diligently for the last four years to come up with a plan that would give Ojai It's movie theater back I think we can all agree that Ohai needs a theater The current state of movie theatre viewing in our society has changed significantly since the water main break and the flood of the Ohio Playhouse The primary reason for these present delays in construction is that we've been doing extensive research and getting much needed consultation from professionals in the industry as to the best ways to rebuild a movie theater that people will still want to come to on a regular basis.

We can all agree that everyone wants to see this building open for business again as soon as possible, and we are finally in a position to move forward when restarting the construction within the permits that we've obtained. So, waiving the fees and the willingness of the Historic Preservation Commission to meet when needed to hasten the permitting process would help us expedite any further permits needed for the minor changes that we have planned.

And again, our family is in support of this designation just as we are fully committed to keeping the business a movie theater and we will continue with our plans to reopen as soon as possible.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:03:30

Thank you. Okay, thank you. Those are all the only cards I have so I guess at this point we'll close the hearing and the council will take it under deliberation. So the hearing is closed. Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:03:46

Very excited, you know. I've been wanting to hear those words for a long time in terms of an effective partnership and I'm inspired by the possibilities including becoming... because we haven't been open here, I've been going to the Riviera more in Santa Barbara I hope something like that could evolve here and it would have a lot of secondary impacts and feedback, positive feedbacks with all the what we have in terms of film society and playwright festival and so on and so forth. So I'm really excited and I just am ready to make a motion but I don't want

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:04:28

We'll make the motion. That's appropriate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:04:30

I'm going to move that we approve with special attention to waiving the fees, that we don't miss anything that's specific. I want to waive any fee specific to the landmarking status and make sure any and all are waived.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:04:45

I'll second.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:04:46

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:04:47

just want to say I'd be awfully hard-pressed to vote no on a report on a historic building that's a picture is in my office of all the people in front, on July 4th of 2015. This building is not only historical to all of us in Ojai and I spent many times there but It's also a focal point of our battle against Golden State Water and all of how that went. In fact, it was Councilmember Wyrick who called me one day and said I'm tired of this building being shut down and nothing going on find something we can do And we put our foot down and tried to get as much as we could out of the Public Utility Commission. At least I think we helped a little bit in moving it closer to today, so one thing that blew my mind was in that case, one thing the judge asked or I should say the Administrative Law Judge said is this not a historical landmark?

And I was just telling Brian about this Steve McClare, the former City Manager taking a picture from the hole in the wall from the theater over to see the Portico Tower, the post office tower. And I remember in the brief writing it's not a historic landmark because it blew me away it wasn't. But it's in the shadow of one. So now I don't have to say that anymore so I think this is a long time coming.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:06:02

And I would have to support the motion because under oath at the Superior Court, I testified along with Greg. It was historic. The cultural value and we had the same issue when the Golden State wanted to challenge why it wasn't a landmark. That's a good question but that doesn't mean it's not a landmark. It just hasn't been blessed so as we've been asked this evening to give blessings, I think this is a good time to do it. Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:06:28

So my concern going through this was that the owners wanted it landmarked And so I'm hearing that you do And then how is this land marking gonna impact the sale of it to your prospective buyers? Have they all agreed To this landmarking and at not being an impediment Yeah

1:06 – 1:1120 turns

PresenterTanya Parkerour family today we would like to first sProposedself-stated1:06:50

The theater is not currently for sale at the moment and With yes, this designation would affect the value of the building going fortune if you're going forward in the future However, my family feels that it is important to maintain this historical facade. It's just a landmark on the façade of the building, right? So that's something we're willing to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:07:15

accept and then the the permit fees that were waving what are we waiving? I Thank you

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
PresenterTanya Parkerour family today we would like to first sProposedself-stated1:07:39

We have some minor changes planned. We want to upgrade the lighting in the sign, the marquees to LED and on the restaurant side upgrade the windows to be operable windows to bring in some more light and air into that building. So there are a few minor changes that are planned. The stucco color and everything's going to remain the same. There's no changes to any of the historical lines of the theater that are in the report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:08:04

We're not waiving those fees and Golden State Water was gonna

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:08:06

pay them, right? Mayor I had just a couple questions for Brian. Thank you And again, this is all an educational process for me. So I've been here 26 years. I've seen the sound in the theater changed. I've seen speakers set up. I have seen chairs replaced. I have seen a number of things that have taken, you know, that have been remodeled or redone. Are they outlined in here as to what is going to you know, what are the Designated features that this is only the facade

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:08:48

So typically when someone comes to the historic preservation, to landmark whatever it is there are historic features that are called out. Most times those historic features are solely external in some cases there are historic features within the house that people want to be specified as a landmark item and in those cases Before any changes take place in internally, they would have to come to the city and then go before the historic. If it was landmarked and the internal character defining features were specified in the historic report so there's no internal that is not at the case in this right? There's no internal features

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:09:31

that are going to be landmarked on this on

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:09:32

the inside.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:33

No, okay

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:09:37

If you look in your packet exhibit a has the character defining features which are all focused on the facade and architecture

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:09:46

There's nothing else then let's call a vote Wait till the next item I get to recuse myself then we don't know who's in charge.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:09:59

I'll tell you guys a story while we're waiting. Well, you're running the meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:10:02

I said let's call

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:10:04

He needs he wants to vote on this but I'll tell can I tell us a little story I guess it was 37 years ago that your dad came to Ojai, and he tells me I'm the first Ojai person he met. And I was at the home of a mutual friend, and of course I didn't have a car, and he was going to give me a ride through town. And I don't know if he'd ever even seen the town, but being the spiritual kind of psychic person that he is, as we drove past the theater, he suddenly turned his head and goes, And he did, yeah.

So I do remember going there as an elementary school student and 10 cents you would go to see a nice matinee. Quarter, you could really have a great afternoon for a quarter popcorn, a candy bar, and a ticket to get in.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:11:00

I have one more question that does remind me. I remember the attorney that represented you, John Howard. One of the conditions was that he got a new popcorn machine. Is that still happening? Hopefully.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:11:22

We're waiting for you to conduct the vote, Mayor.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0
Show transcript
Councilmember Wyrick? Yes. Council Member Haney? Yes. Council Member Francina? Yes! Mayor Pro Tem Blatts? Yes Mayor Johnston? Yes

and thank you very much

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:11:43

Okay Discussion and review of the watershed adjudication And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:11:53

city attorney, I believe I need to recuse myself on this yes my counsel for other

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:11:56

parties in the case. Thank you

1:12 – 1:175 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:12:02

Okay, I think Mr. City Attorney will you kick it off? Happy to so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:12:09

thank you Mayor Council and members of the public this is an item really just to have a brief discussion of the Ventura River I'd like From the two groundwater basins at issue, the Ojai Valley Groundwater Basin, the Upper Ventura River Groundwater Basin plus the Upper Ojai Basin and the last basin which I believe is the Matiloha. There's one more watershed. It's four basins that issue the Lower Ventura River Basin. So four groundwater basins all part of the Ventura River.

Ventura's suit derived from a underlying suit that was filed by a group called Channel Keeper, which is an environmentalist non-profit that has sued Ventura's challenging the city of Ventura diversions from the Ventura River to provide domestic water service were violations of various requirements particularly the state constitutional requirements for reasonable and beneficial use of water as part of Venturas defense. To that challenge by Channel Keeper Ventura has contended that the water usage by others is unreasonable, essentially saying if we are unreasonable as a Ventura user then so too are all others who might use water from this system.

There was some challenge to that it went up to the Court of Appeal the outcome of that was direction or a decision rather by the City of Ventura to convert the case that previously had been a fight between Ventura, Channel Keeper and certain other large consumptive users of water. To convert that into a fight between Ventura, Channel Keeper and every possible water user in the Ventura River Watershed hence where we are now as you'll know Ventura or may be aware Ventura initiated the full-scale adjudication on January 2nd of this year And has begun serving notice to persons who are overlying landowners and has begun serving as a directly initiating litigation against any landowner of riparian land or any person who is known to operate a water well at this time.

The person's, the city is included in two categories there as an institution. City owns riparian land. Riparian means land that is adjacent to a river or tributary and which under California system has the right to pull water from that river or from that tributary under some rules and restrictions. And then overlying land is any, any land in the valley that overlies any of the four groundwater basins at issue for which a landowner has a right to sink a well under rules and regulations. And currently there's a moratorium on wells in the city of Ojai.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:15:03

Okay Matt can we...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:15:06

Perhaps I'm giving too much background. So

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:15:08

yeah, right you asking a lawyer he's giving the good lawyer answer In essence, I think everyone knows at this point that the this the city of Ventura I guess partially in frustration and partially trying to bring finality to the water rights Throughout the western part of the county or our watershed Has been directed by the courts To send all of us. I think probably maybe if there are property owners here than they Audience if you haven't gotten one, you'll get one like I didn't. I think just about everybody up here The City Council did meet in closed session to discuss what we might do We've made some overtures to the city of Ventura To suggest that they take a step back possibly if there's a way to do that and use alternative dispute resolution techniques rather than go to trial which is a very expensive and a lengthy process and And we're trying to figure out what avenues are available to us.

The council has, well we as a community have our fortunate if there's anything fortunate in all this one is the droughts kind of tempered a little bit but the other is It is Richard Hages who lives here in town, one of our residents and a highly qualified person to help us advise the city as well as reach out to the other parties and provide them with maybe some alternatives to what is going on with the litigation.

Council is interested in doing that they also and I don't know. I have the right legal terms, but what is this a joint? We're exploring the possibility I'll do it kind of layman's terms and then if we need illegal The idea that you know 10,000 property owners All get this stuff separately, most of whom they don't have wells. They're not gonna drill a well. It's not their issue but there are substantial number of people where it is a concern and it is an issue. And we are concerned about having to all of us make that decision about filing the court fees and what that means. So what the council was Exploring and we've asked the staff to do this is is there some benefit in some kind of joint defense? Where everybody has to meet their own responsibilities, but if we collectively do it Is there a better chance of getting a better outcome and I don't know if that says it clearly enough

1:17 – 1:2316 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:17:40

I think the key point to bear in mind there is that the council has directed evaluation of that approach. That doesn't lift the obligation for any person who is a landowner and who received or was served the lawsuit, to consider for yourself whether or not to defend the suit and whether or not to file the form answer and pay the filing fee and participate in the case or not do so.

That choice has to be made individually, but the council has directed evaluation of a possible joint defense approach for the valley or for the city that is under evaluation as a possible solution. And the council has noted it's continuing to work with the council members in Ventura to look at and pursue an alternative solution that doesn't involve adjudication.

We've seen some positive movement if you were at this Ventura City Council meeting last night They've directed that they evaluate a forthcoming proposal from Casitas Municipal Water District to look at an alternative to the adjudication. So there's some proposals afoot, no definitive action yet.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:18:39

Okay, anything else you need to be said? So I'm sure most of you or at least if you don't know who Richard Hages is. Richard helped manage Casitas for a number of years and then spent a lot of his career as the head of the Camarosa Water System And worked and was very instrumental in the Cayagas watershed, bringing all the parties together over these environmental issues to find a physical solution to a problem. That is to deal with what the environmental impacts were and do it cooperatively. And so we're hoping that maybe that's out there and we'll have more news for you probably at our next council meeting.

Okay, let us... Did I have some cards on this? That was item three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:19:38

Nothing for item three.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:19:39

Okay, item number four is the attendance report city commissions and consideration of changing membership status of individual commissioners This is the request from council members what at the last council meeting So how do we want to proceed on this? I'm The over the members who Wishing to have it

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:20:01

back. I can give a very brief staff report It is just to kind of reiterate that at the January 14th meeting as is typical at the first meeting of each year we gave the Attendance record for the prior year for each Commission Council discussed the reports and asked for information about The motion from February of 2019 that discussed the absence policy, that information is provided in this report. And importantly it notes that council would consider removal of commissioners if they have four or more absences in a year and as noted in the prior report there are some commissioners with those absences so and they are listed in the report as well So the item is brought back with that information for council discussion of any action Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:20:59

I have a question two questions On the four or more absences is the Planning Commission which meets twice a month counted the same as other commissions. I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:21:09

Yeah, so we reviewed that motion from February 12th 2019 which had it was a motion and it was approved by council. And it specifically in fact focused on the planning commission and noted that once any commissioner has four meeting absences per year including for special meetings council will consider removal of the commissioner. So I had actually recalled to you that I thought there was an allowance for Planning Commission because they meet twice as often but it actually is not the case.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:21:39

And I didn't vote for that anyway, did I?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:21:41

We got this a note an

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:21:42

email from the assistant city manager Joseph Joe Fiss and it says For your information, I will be putting together a protocol for reorganizing all the commissions after their appointments in May. Typically reorganization involves only naming a chair and vice-chair and establishing a schedule for the year. So my question is could you clarify why that was changed?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:22:18

So what we are proposing is, so most of the term limits end in May. I see. And so what we've proposed is rather than naming a chair and a vice-chair in January and then having to reorganize in May based on that change, that we do the reorganization in May moving forward. And so for example if you know the Arts Commission, we wouldn't expect a change in their membership although well yeah, so we wouldn' expect a change in their membership But if somebody's term ends in May, which they do have a couple of people whose terms are ending in May. They would be appointing their chair and vice-chair at that time rather than appointing in January for four months.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:23:00

But in the meantime the chair quit.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:23:02

And that was why that was a terrible example. But yes, the chair did just unfortunately left the commission so that was a bad example. But

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:23:14

how are we going to address their concerns that they've stated? They sent a letter with the concerns and why that doesn't work for them.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:23:24

I'd like to I thought about this and

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:23:26

what I'm going to suggest is an approach which doesn't involve

1:23 – 1:2819 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:23:41

Naming individuals, but to see if we would be comfortable with a collective policy here. Because it's important this is part of our governance as how we do things in our city is to have people participating in the commissions and it asks a lot of volunteers but at the same time it's part of what we depend upon so what I'm going to suggest and I haven't written out a motion We adopt a motion which states that anybody who has exceeded three vacancies, three absences, we're going to declare that position vacant.

Now our ordinance states that when a position is, when a term is up and this would clarify that the term is you know even though it's declared vacant the person is free to continue to operate in that position but there will be notice to take applications for replacement of that position and go through the standard position where the mayor makes nominations and then it comes to us.

So I've written, I think it's the fairest way to deal with this. And the person whose position is declared vacant is still free to apply again, to be reappointed to the position they can reapply. And so I'm going to pass out my motion for consideration, and I'll come back to it later if you'd like.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:25:21

OK, well, I have a card for public comment, so we can take the public comment and then we can continue with the discussion. Brian Aikens? A man trooper is a good word. You did say three times?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:25:36

I did three, only three. So again share the historic preservation for those that just tuned in regarding absences we did have one commissioner that had three one of those we've clarified the those absences one was travel one for it was for Medical conditions. So the other commissioners all only our current commissioners all only had one absence including Myself who worked 11 hours from Atlanta to get here and missed the meeting that day That much I was at the why when I get the phone call you blamed your wife, I think Said my my dear sweet wife, please. My dear sweet wife I didn't want all wife wives in the valley to hate me so The other thing I wanted to bring up or just remind the council is that we do have Seven commissioners but we have two vacancies at least a point moved to Prescott Arizona she has been gone for a number of months and Darwin McCready who was with us for Six, seven years was our chair for four years.

Thank you Darwin for your service has left commissions because of busy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:26:50

Okay? Because of what?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:26:52

Being busy. Oh being busy. That's a good thing yeah. Good thing making a living yes that's all I have thank you very much

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:27:01

okay thank you Brian

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:27:04

Say something there may be people here who don't know that we've postponed the ATP. Oh, okay If anyone just arrived to speak on item 8 on the ATP project It's been postponed till the first meeting in February and it will be the first item on the agenda Okay. I did my duty.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:27:28

Okay, fine. Thank you, Susan. That's important to do that. Okay, Bill, you passed out a motion. Yes, so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:27:37

I think I explained the rationale behind it. It's meant to try to come up with very fair well stated and it doesn't take people off a commission. It just declares the position It basically just tries to treat everybody the same according to our protocol. And so I'll make the motion and see if I have a second, I passed it out.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:28:01

Okay we've got a motion do we have a second? Okay, it's been moved and seconded.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:28:06

Discussion? Are you by this theory a person that has been absent three times...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:28:17

More than three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:28:18

More than three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:28:19

Yeah more than three not three more than three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:28:20

More than three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:28:21

Four or more would be better.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:28:24

So you're saying now four or more?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:28:26

No it's more than three so it's the same as four is more.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:28:30

The current standard is

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:28 – 1:3942 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:28:49

Further

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:28:49

move that any Commissioner that has four Meeting absences per year including special meetings at the council will point at that point. We'll consider removal from the commission

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:28:59

Which is the same as more than three? Or the same as four or more, but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:29:03

how long are we okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:29:04

Yeah, right, yeah, no, what's not first But you're

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:29:07

saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:29:14

Shall be declared vacated with notice to be issued. But that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:29:19

person doesn't have to leave? No, they would continue to serve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:29:22

They would continue to serve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:29:23

Be free to make application to be reappointed but we'd also take applications for other people that might be interested in that position.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:29:30

This makes a good point when it says declared vacated It sounds like that. It's now empty as opposed to the term is there Their appointment is deemed expired. Is that what

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:29:41

we're saying? It's vacated would mean they they're not on the Commission They don't have the power to vote. They don't count for quorum. Yeah, the goal is to put them in a probation status effectively That's not the right word, but I don't like that either. But if the I guess my question is do you want them to count or not while the council is debating whether whether to give them a pass?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:30:00

I think they would become acting commissioners pending approval.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:30:04

But there's no con the code doesn't contemplate acting commissioner

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:30:07

with the code does state that of your term is up that you can continue to serve until the position is replaced. Are you are named another term

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:30:16

With the exception of the Planning Commission, which has different language for its terms. Do you have some suggestion to try to... You understand my intent? I think the goal would be for any position, any commissioner who hits more than three or four, for any commissioner who hits the trigger as selected by Council That person shall be subject to replacement by the council. The clerk is directed to issue notice of the opportunity for replacement and the council then would, upon such time as the mayor or the relevant council member for the planning commission recall that's not by districts makes a recommendation the council will consider replacing that person with either themselves or someone else. So it wouldn't be vacant, if your goal is to let them continue to serve...

That's true. I'm poor language. Then they would be put in this eligible for replacement status. Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:31:17

Whether I don't know whether I'm on board for this motion. Yeah, but Is this would this go into effect for the current commissioners that we're reviewing or with? That's my intention So this would, your intent is that it would directly impact the four individuals listed in here that have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:31:35

four. That's my intent is that there would be a round of notices of applications. They'd be declared eligible for replacement instead of vacated and they would be free to apply for another term as well as others who might be interested.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:31:52

My question is, you're saying there's not going to be any exceptions to this rule. So someone has a husband or wife that's in the process of dying and they need to do hospice end-of-life care. There's no exception to your policy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:08

My policy is trying to not get personal.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:11

Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:13

I— And the exceptions is in the application process where the mayor has a nomination power and we have approval power. And I am specifically not trying to get into debating individuals here. Being fair, nevertheless.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:33

I just see it completely different My feeling is that if there's a problem the chair can bring up the problem with absences if there's not a problem If someone misses and there's no problem why go through this process?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:49

Because we have a protocol

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:50

Well, I didn't vote for that protocol so I object to this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:32:56

That's why there's five of us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:57

yeah

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:32:59

Well, it seems to me we're I understand where you're going Bill. You don't want to make these things publicly personal. Right. On the other hand, I drove a monorail at one time at Disneyland. Not one time. I didn't know that! That was my job. I was a monorail driver and when they trained you they explained what they call a dead man's switch which meant if you suddenly had a heart attack, you went limp, the switch automatically put the brakes on It seems like we're sort of coming up with a variation on a dead man switch, rather than a conscious decision that we make. And it seems to me that I would be happy to meet with Councilman Wyrick and see if we could figure out a strategy for this rather than trying to do it in a council meeting that is respectful of people's privacy.

And recognizes the reality these are uncompensated positions and we don't have people knocking down the doors to get in. And it seems to me that there are some other alternatives, they're a little bit uncomfortable but I think we probably could come up with one. I appreciate the effort to figure out how do we get this changed because right now what happens, we've got some people with four, some with eight. There's a big difference between four and eight but the real question is why? And what is the impact of not being in attendance? Is it actually affecting the business of the community? So are you willing to talk about that?

Yes, let's carry this forward a couple of weeks and keeps a little pressure on us and you and I'll sit down see we can figure out something that maybe I'm not sure we can but we can try.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:34:42

I have one more comment Since you two are going to go off and discuss this This is not an elected position. When people don't want to serve, they just quit without even giving notice or not beholden to the public. Some of them give notice if they can but if they don't... I think the human thing to do is ask why are you absent? Do you want this position? It's such a simple way to resolve it instead of all these I hope you consider that. Just ask them. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:35:19

also think Mayor, that when you put an application in to sit on a commission along with it comes the responsibility of being there and there's a number of times that we've attended Commission meetings when they don't even have enough people for a quorum We've had a meeting here where three, a special meeting where I think it was the whole planning commission one person showed up. Yeah. I mean it's... More

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:35:44

than once that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:35:44

true. So that told me that night that they didn't care about attending that meeting. That's what they demonstrate to me and it'd be no different if there was anyone up here on the dais that decided not to show up three or four or five times. No matter what the degree of difficulty is You still have to accept responsibility for your action and you have to accept responsibility For being a member of a commission in this community. So the willy-nilly effect to me doesn't make sense, you know You either have a rule or you

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:36:15

don't okay where we can debate it when we bring it back if you're good with us continuing it two weeks and Bill and I will see if we can figure out anything different from this. And if not, we'll be prepared to deal with this motion next time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:25

I just hope you put illness family emergency or something like that in your suggestion.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:36:32

Okay. Okay, without objection we will so do and with Bill's consent. No problem I withdraw my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:36:40

motion for

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:36:41

now. Number five is the chapter nine of the Ventura County Fire Protection District Ordinance number 31 James?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:36:51

Thank you. And this item is before the council as part of the code adoption process, the Ventura County Fire Protection District every building code cycle will adopt their amendments to Chapter 9 and their amendments are those that are higher than the state mandated requirements. We recently had the updated code Code cycle, we adopted our own fire specific

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:37:22

amendments.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:37:24

And then we received the request which we typically do from the Fire Protection District to adopt the amendments that they've adopted and it was in the attachment. We didn't explain it necessarily in the report and I apologize but It's the issue of adopting the fire sprinkler requirements. And if you can recall, we've discussed it previously and ultimately decided not to adopt it as part of our benefit analysis but it's the requirement that for residential construction when somebody is adding an addition to an existing structure If the addition is greater than 1,000 square feet and greater than 50% of the existing structure that both structures must include sprinklers.

So that means that a 3,000-square foot house you can add a 1,400-square foot addition and that wouldn't require sprinklers but once you went above to 1,500 square feet which is 50% and greater than 1000 square feet or above then it would trigger the requirement for sprinklers And for commercial construction, it's a little different. It's a requirement that adding 25% of the floor area would trigger the requirements. So if somebody has a 4,000 square foot property they can add 900 square feet and not add sprinklers but if they added 1,000 square feet they would have to add sprinklers.

So as mentioned the this has been requested over the last couple cycles we've adopted our own amendments that Focus on fire protection, but we were requested to consider it again. So the item is on the agenda requested by the fire

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:39:01

So I have one card unless there are other questions of staff from the council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:39:07

I just have one question of staff How does this affect ad use?

1:39 – 1:466 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:39:13

Well, we adopted already 85%, so that would mean that this would kick in ADUs and work against affordability if we adopted it.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:39:21

But that's for the junior ADU isn't it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:39:24

So this has no... The standards that the Fire Protection District proposes have no special protection for ADUs, so it's going to go back to the size of the proposed ADU. If the ADU is an addition to an existing house or existing poolhouse or structure and exceeds that standard of 1,000 square feet and half the existing structure then that would trigger sprinklers for the entire structure including the ADU.

If an ADU is a full new build so whole new four walls in the back that would also under the fire protection district requirements trigger

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:39:56

sprinklers. Wayne Maynard.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:40:09

Thank You mr. Mayor I was wondering since I'm the only speaker if I could have five minutes Okay, okay, it might take me a little bit more than three minutes when I want to cover With regards to the city manager managers explanation The ordinance also requires all non-commercial building are all non residential buildings to be sprinkler. The ordinance doesn't just deal with Right with additions. Okay, and that's probably my biggest concern actually So, just an introduction. I'm Wayne Maynard. I live in the city of Ojai and am a retired fire captain. I worked for the Fire District for 36 years.

Right now I'm doing some part-time work for the district. Just want to disclose that. However, I'm here today as a resident representing myself as a resident of Ojiai. Why I'm interested in this issue? It's because I've been involved with it pretty much my entire career. The first district ordinance was adopted in the early 1980s and I was involved with that project.

I went to several of the city councils and promoted it. I worked on it for many editions, several times so I've been kind of following it for many years. The City of Ojai has supported the Fire District Sprinkler Ordinance from the first ordinance that was adopted in the early 80's for nearly 30 years And it wasn't until the city created the Building Appeals Board and they sent the ordinance to be reviewed by that board, that position changed. The city no longer supports the fire district's requirements. I'm not going to go into any more detail about that.

So we've talked about it many times, you guys have heard it. Tonight I'm going to focus my comments on the purpose of the fire district, of the sprinklers as it relates to the implementation of the strategic plan for firefighting operations. There's an overall strategic plan of how the Fire Department puts out fires in buildings and fire sprinkler ordinance is part of that strategic plan because it limits the size of fires in buildings basically.

First of all, there's four different fire departments in the county The fire departments through automatic and mutual aid agreements operate as a regional fire protection system There's a single dispatch center and the closest fire trucks regardless of jurisdiction Respond to all the calls most structure fires responses to the Ojai Valley involve a mutual aid response every city And the county, except for the city of Ojai has adopted fire sprinkler requirements more restrictive than what the state does. The state is a minimum standard and the primary purpose and justification for that is that fires in sprinkler buildings require fewer resource commitments to put the fires out.

It takes less time, less resources particularly during like any kind of natural disasters or Road closures, things like that. Because Ojai is of our isolation it's even more important if we need to consider increasing the number of sprinkler buildings in our community. We have dozens of buildings in the community that are sprinklered because of the district's ordinance over the decades.

It's my contention that adopting the Fire District Ordinance This meeting is to the strategic plan is the OSHA 2-in, 2-out rule. This was a new law that went into effect a few years before I retired and basically it's when a fire truck arrives on the scene of a structure fire firefighters are not allowed to enter the building to extinguish the fire if there is not a known rescue so if you go into a commercial building late at night and there's no known rescue firefighters can't go in and start putting the fire out in that building until there's four firefighters on scene Two advance the hose line to go in, two are outside prepared to do a rescue for the two that go inside if necessary.

We only have three firefighters on our fire trucks which means we can't advance the hose line until the second fire truck arrives. That's the potential delay which is mitigated if the building has fire sprinklers because the sprinklers control the size of fire or extinguish it. The third is firefighter safety Not only do fire sprinklers increase the safety for building occupants, but it also improves firefighter safety I've fallen through a roof. I've been injured on fires The sprinklers put the fires out that creates less of a potential hazard for our firefighters And I think that's very important especially it is to me There's also some other Environmental benefits for sprinklers Fires and sprinkler buildings require less water for fire suppression There's less air pollution released to the environment because the fires are kept smaller And there's less hazardous water runoff that goes into the storm drains and the waterways because we're not dumping tons and tons of water on the building because the fire sprinkler put it out.

So I would recommend to the council that they continue the support for the district like they've done for decades And approve the ordinance, basically you're ratifying it to allow the fire district to enforce it within the jurisdictional boundaries of the city. Thank

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:46:18

you. Thank You Wayne I have one more card Dale Hanson

1:46 – 2:0015 turns

CommentDale HansonProposedself-stated1:46:27

You might have another card soon Bob just arrived Anyway, I am a member. I'm Dale Hanson. I am a member of the Building Appeals Board and we vetted that issue so many times it's just amazing to me that it keeps coming back. We've looked at all different angles and I'm not going to go into all the details because I have support here now but what really saves people from fires are fire alarms Many times fire sprinklers malfunction and they go off when they weren't intended to. They also add another expense to buildings, and I think that we really need... If we value the work of the Building Appeals Board We've been through this so many times and given all of our reasons, I think that we should recognize with all due respect to Wayne's comments.

And I know he's been a fireman and he understands but there are other issues besides that. There are issues for the building owner and there are issues about what fire sprinklers really do as opposed to fire alarms. And so I will let the next card speaker, thank you.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:47:38

I'm sorry, I can't read this. But I'll take a guess. Bob, come on up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:47:48

Good evening. This is entirely

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:47:50

a joke

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:47:51

either. This is getting to be beyond the pale. So this will be our fourth go-round Mr. Maynard, if you will review said he thought the important thing about us not doing this Was that if we didn't do it the other cities would unadopted Now that's the official record Which is our tape which is on file? And I'm sure nobody's going to refute that, because we'll pull the tape and we'll look at it.

The Building Appeal Board has unanimously gone over this thing four times. We looked at the imposition. We looked at what was going on. We agreed with the fire department that if they will go ahead and get the top firemen in the state to adopt this, we would welcome the change. We would welcome any change because it would be law and we wouldn't resist anything, but we haven't had a single fatality in a residential fire in this city.

We have had a fatality in a garage and we took care of that with fire alarms in the garage. I had a big fire here. You know, they waited until after the Thomas Fire and two months later we had a garage fire and it was almost a seven-figure fire. And had we had that alarm, we wouldn't have had that type of loss. With insurance everybody pays for that so this extra sprinklers is really going to add no benefit. It hasn't in the past, it won't now.

What it will do is it will victimize people that are probably not very adroit. We actually had somebody build a house 1,007 square feet. Which would have meant that if they were to shorten the dimensions by 3 inches on the front and the back sides. It would've come in at 999 feet instead of 1007. And so when you take a look at this, is there really a difference where somebody has to do 1000 square feet and I can do 2300 square feet?

So it seems to be inconsistent as to the 50% Fires don't look at 50 percent fires. Don't look at square footage and The building appeal board asked you for another thing while we're at this If you're familiar with geography, and you know where foothill lane is the north side of foothill Lane is in the highest fire zone we have in the state of California Right across the street, 30 feet on the south side of the street is in no fire zone whatsoever. Now the last time I heard the numbers as we had flames 300 feet and blowing at 80 miles an hour wind at the top of Foothill.

I don't think that fires respect artificial lines on maps And I think you want to get around to adopting this ultra-high fire zone because the ember cask is going to go from one end of the city to the next. No, it's not going to affect the insurance rates because they're already ahead of you. They've already drawn a circle around Ojai. So as of now, I'm not even selling new homeowners insurance to people that are not with State Farm. Now they won't be eligible to buy in the city along with most of the other carriers couple of reasons we never finished our water suppression system We never did any mitigation of brush We don't have a disaster plan in force and where people understand it, where we've noticed people.

So we have really done nothing to move us along from two years ago when we lucked out because we got a shift of wind so please consider that and as far as the sprinklers go If it's that important for 7900 479 cities within California and only a handful of them do this There's got to be something different I don't believe that the resources of the Ventura County Fire Department exceed those of the state fire marshal And the state fire marshal has not come up with this code. And yes, we will have many conflicts between With these 80 years of who's on first and what the square footage is and all the other things. And does it add to affordability Of course it doesn't.

You have extra plan checks you have extra cost you have extra material costs you have extra testing so I'm all for sprinklers but not the way we're doing it here thank you

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:53:00

Okay, I don't have any further cards so let's bring it back to the council. Well much as I respect Bob and others, I'd like to weigh in on some of the logic and consistency of what we do and I think that's something Bob that you're concerned with too If we were to take the argument that fire sprinklers aren't worth putting fire sprinklers in, why would we put them in ADUs if we're trying to make them affordable? Why do we have them in houses at all? Why do we require them? And what concerns me is that we're not doing this to...

Let's see. It's 1,000 square feet That's a lot of square footage, so it's not like we're oppressing social justice issues of poor people. It's also true that you have to have at least 50% of the house and at least 10,000 square feet, right? Pardon me. Yeah, you'd like that one would be okay right? The threshold I mean a thousand square feet when I see the number of houses they get flipped Where they buy it for less than a million dollars Make it really really nice and then have it on the market for almost two million dollars It seems like having sprinklers put in that is not a bad thing. It also seems like it's contrary to our concern about keeping what affordable housing we have, affordable.

It, how does this hurt anything? If you're gonna add 1,000 square feet and you finance it. Yeah it costs a little more but I'll tell you when you have to rent a house that's just been doubled in value that costs the renter a whole lot more so it just seems to me the consistency of the arguments...I don't get it if The idea that maybe Mr. Maynard or other people have said that this might be the tip of the spear or the nose of the camel, and if it didn't happen, well then not doing it isn't a problem because it's setting a trend to go against it but it doesn't mean it's a bad idea. To me it doesn't.

It seems like we're in the middle, what was just testified to us about the ember cast and all that I totally agree with. I think we're in a high fire zone. You know, the Cal Fire maps are. I think they just don't want to enter into the local domestic politics of drawing maps and then getting into the issues of fire insurance rates. But from what I understand, yeah, the underwriters have already figured that out long ago. They're the ones taking the risk and they're setting the rates accordingly. So we are in a high-fire zone. We make everybody who builds a new house do this. We make anybody who even builds an ADU do it.

So why would we want to exempt somebody who potentially, I'm in the construction business at one point. Why is that such a burden? When it actually does, it may not be the only thing that helps control fire but it certainly helps. So it's really weighing that extra cost for the investor versus our housing stock and the price of housing, and whether or not we believe sprinklers are worth it. There are a lot of places where they say why would you have sprinklers in residential? That just adds to the expense of housing and we don't have enough affordable housing but I don't hear anybody wanting to repeal the other. I don'y know if we could do that but so... Bill, I'm sorry for going on like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:57:03

No, I just want to make sure you knew I had a different opinion.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:57:06

No, I know you do even without taking it but I will take it. But I listened

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:57:10

carefully to you and I do have some specific... What I don't like about what this going above state code does is not having to do with new construction, but the fact that this, at least as I read it. You gotta read the whole thing. There's some significant retrofitting costs and retrofitting fire sprinklers systems is much more expensive than new construction. Much more expensive. And when you have provisions in some of these things like for the purposes of application of the automatic fire protection system provisions contained within this chapter far walls Shelter Triggering a very expensive retrofit, which when I studied this it's been awhile can be three four or more times the cost of new construction and fire sprinklers systems. There are a lot of issues with fire sprinkler systems that I think the BAB vets has vetted you know multiple times much better than I can just speak to tonight but I also want to put up a different opinion.

Scholarly studies, believe it or not, that question the mass application of fire sprinkler systems in residential areas that can actually work against fire protection in terms of all going on at the same time in a wildfire condition.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:58:55

And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:58:55

that has caused problems so it's not just All good, no bad aspect. And it can especially in terms of the triggering the very high retrofit costs be much more expensive than as you know other forms of fire safety mitigation.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:59:17

Right but why would we want to necessarily make that a major consideration? Are we encouraging people to double the size of things?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:59:25

What we're trying to, I believe we are by state policy and city policy encouraging infill, residential infill as part of an answer to affordable

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction1:59:34

housing. Probably not on remodels. I would think that'd be new construction. And it would be under the laws with have fire?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:59:42

Well, all I'm saying is that when you do more than just this there's a lot of triggering here. For example we have part of the ADUs we're talking about that's mandated by the state is creating separate dwelling units within existing residences. You can add to buildings. I just view this as there's a reason why the State Farm Marshal has not adopted this And I just think that it works counterproductive to our overall policy goals and also has unintended consequences that I don't want to impose on our citizenry. That's my position.

2:00 – 2:0722 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:00:34

Good evening. Massoud Aragi, Fire Marshal with the County Fire. I just want to clear a couple of things so we're all kind of understand before we take a vote. One of the things that you brought up about the firewall and you mentioned example of the arcade.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:00:54

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:00:55

Arcade is an existing building what this is talking about is if an existing building that was previously sprinklered Because of the firewall, because their score footage was reduced because of the firewall. If that firewall is breached it will require sprinklers. That has nothing to do with the arcade. We have done another project over here where there was an existing firewall The building that got sprinkled was just to the firewall. There was nothing beyond that. We didn't go on the entire building, we just sprinkled a portion of it up to the firewall. So that example doesn't apply to this section.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:01:34

Well, that's not what I'm reading in the plain language.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:01:37

I'm here to tell you that we've been applying it for over 30-some years. It's exactly what it is. This is new, that you're asking

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:01:44

us to adopt?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:01:45

That is. The purpose of that firewall was because at one point the ordinance only required sprinklers when we had 5,000 square foot or more. At the time that this was a requirement There was an allowance of putting a firewall to break the building into a smaller size. This section applies to if we gave you that permission, do not put sprinklers because you had the firewall and today you're breaching that firewall then you put sprinklers has nothing to do with an example of arcade so that I just want to make sure that we are clear now with regard to ADU from the State Fire Marshal We have the interpretation that any ADU, detached ADU, if the building, the residence is not fire sprinkler, the ADU does not require to be fire sprinkler.

Only if the main residence has fire sprinklers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:02:50

What

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:02:50

if you're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:02:50

modifying a primary residence for an ADU? I'm sorry say it again. What if you're modifying a primary residence for an ADU? If you go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:02:59

over 50 percent and over 1,000. I mean that's a major significant addition to a house These numbers that you see here are significant additions. They're not a little bit here, a little bit there. So that requirement, the requirements here does not affect the ADU to the extent that it is being talked about. The other one I want to talk about is that you mentioned that this issue has been talked about and why are we talking about again?

Because every three years the code change and we are required to come to you. If it was my option, I wouldn't have come to the Building Appeals Board. Would have come to the council. This is not my my choice, so I'm not here to burden you with re Going over these over and over again believe me doesn't pleasure me to go through this every three

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:03:58

Just address the council and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:03:59

answer the questions

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:04:01

rather than debate the other people's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:04:02

testimony I wouldn't have The reason it's coming to you is because of exactly a council required us So I just want to be clear with that one The state requires this is regardless of our ordinance the state requires Sprinklers in all residential occupancies Done new all new now. The question you ask is that well if this was so good If the ordinance is so good, why wouldn't the state do it?

I'm gonna answer that question by saying that if this state thought and Having a local ordinance is a bad idea. They would have prevented from local ordinances having any ordinances, any jurisdictions having any local ordinances. The reason the state does the minimum and allows the local jurisdictions to go above that minimum is because the geography, the topography, the climatic condition throughout this state is not the same for every jurisdiction. So, every jurisdiction will look at how their resources with respect to climate, with respect to topography, how do they best need to protect themselves? The state gives that ability to local jurisdictions to make amendments, to make ordinances, to make their communities safer The state doesn't want to come and just make that blanket requirement throughout the state.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:05:29

And we've done

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:05:31

that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:05:32

as a city?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:05:33

Yes, and I'm saying that's the reason the state allows us to have these ordinances.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:05:37

We've done that as a city?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:05:39

Yeah, I don't doubt that. When we come to you and ask you for this section is because we look at, as Wayne mentioned, we look at the overall strategy for the fire protection district and all the cities that are under the jurisdiction of a fire protection district that we serve. So we look at it globally. This is one tool within the toolbox With many other ones that we use, we use the weed abatement. We use the code requirement for construction. We use fire sprinklers. We use variety of tools to provide fire protection for your community.

This is one of the tools. So what my argument has been over past couple of adoption is that give us the tools we need to do our job, this is one of our tools. If the cost was such a huge issue you would have had here people fill here telling you don't do it because it's costing us too much We did this for 30 years, exact same ordinance for 30 years in City of Ojai with no problem.

And then nobody came and said this is too costly. Don't do it. None of the residents have ever called me up and said don't do this. This is too costly.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:07:03

Okay well thank you I appreciate the input. Thank you

2:07 – 2:1230 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:11

Has the county adopted this

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:07:13

yes, okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:07:14

I think County you mean the unincorporated area? Yeah. Oh, yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:17

Just want to make sure

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:07:18

And all the other cities.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:07:20

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:20

mean,

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:07:22

I guess Bill if we don't think fire sprinkler systems have real value then I would understand this and if we thought that because they malfunction sometimes that would be a reason not to have fire sprinkler systems and if we were doing this and putting a huge burden on you know or renter or some small But when you talk about the size we're dealing with here, it's a luxury like a swimming pool and other things that in more expensive estate type situations.

It's just put into the financing of the deal spread over the 30 years. And in some cases it's paid for cash by the person who wants to do it. It just seems to me that they, to not do a fire protection thing because we are not wanting to burden people who want to make major expansions to homes or flip homes and make them much more palatial. I'm all for making palatial homes if there are people who want to buy them, but I don't see that That's a reason not to continue the sprinkler. So I'm not going to say any more I'd maybe I'll make a motion and we'll see if it will go anyplace. I move that We do enact the was it title line is it?

And then we have the right titles Yeah chapter 9 pardon me and and accept the idea of The as the other cities in the county have on the fire sprinklers this do I have a second you have a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:08:53

Why is 1,000 square

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:08:58

feet any less dangerous than 500? Maybe we should come back and amend it again at a later date but I don't think that's an argument not to do something. All right. Okay, we have a motion in a second. I don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:09:14

know just a quick comment. I've just My take on this is that we have professional individuals that have studied this and that have do this if you know their lives are at stake And so I have a tendency to want to lean towards what they have to say it's not to say that bad hasn't done their homework and hasn't An opinion that that is that has some validity It to me would be no different than if our new police captain came to us and stated something about public safety, and wanted to implement these programs.

Who am I to question him? Someone who does it for a living. And so that's where I'm at on this. I just struggle questioning fire. I struggle questioning police. Their lives are on the line, and saving our lives is on the line. So that's why I have to support this. Mayor? Yeah Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:10:07

I do not, don't, our job as council people is not to delegate our judgment. Our job is to take the best available information we have for the most qualified people that we make a judgment. I think we're just experiencing, frankly, the problem with councilpeople in another city delegating judgment and you know what I'm talking about And so I think it's important not to just say, well because the experts say something we should do it. You know history is replete with experts giving you know now looking at the global considerations outside their specific considerations and that's where I'm coming from

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:10:59

Well I knew when I opened that can of worms, I would receive that response from you Bill and I accept it. That's okay. I think this and what the City of Ventura did are entirely two different things. This is about lives being in danger and I'm sorry Wayne and the fire captain have a heck of a lot more experience at fighting fires than I do And the same is Mr. Rivera over there regarding police matters, and I'm not going to interject my opinion or my thoughts or my feelings into something that these professional men bring to the table. So that's why I stand on it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:36

Can I ask you, I'm sorry that I stepped out when I did because I thought I had an understanding. First of all didn't this come before us every year since we've been

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:11:46

here? Every couple years yeah it should be every three years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:50

I heard every three years but my recollection is every year am i

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:11:54

wrong?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:11:56

Yeah last came I think it was October of 2017 but it was because it was coming late in the cycle

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:01

and

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:12:01

were on top of it this time

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:03

All right, now don't laugh at me but how exactly do these sprinklers work when we have the kind of fires that we have here in Ojai? There's something, do people just use them to wet down their house? Do they get triggered by a fire? How does it work?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:12:24

Yeah they're internal and they get triggered by an internal fire so it's not necessarily for the wildland type fires.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:12:30

It doesn't protect the outside that's one of the arguments against it but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:34

And if too many trigger at the same time in a specific area can cause pressure problems.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:39

Yeah that was my next question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:41

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:41

what happens then?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:43

Well, there's water pressure and you have less pressure in the fire hydrant.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:48

And don't we have problems with that already?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:12:50

Yes

2:12 – 2:2033 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:53

So I really don't know, because I hear the pros and cons. But I don't like the idea of losing water pressure. And

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:13:08

all new construction does that. New construction.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:12

Is

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:13:13

that not correct? Every time a sprinkler system goes off it will cause that problem. And the firefighters also have to use what we call fire hydrants in this town. And it's admitted that we are not where we would like to be, but we have very old systems that have to be replaced. I don't see that is the- well okay, pardon me. But

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:35

the concern is not for daily, like the ordinary fires which we have very few of, right? The concern is mostly when we have our wildfires

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:13:47

It is to contain a fire.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:50

And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:13:52

cost of retrofitting, triggered retrofitting.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:13:56

Well, that's been the argument is the cost-benefit and the argument is being made that it costs more. And that's true but we require it of everything else and even though retrofitting bills correct retrofitting frequently is much or can be much more expensive but again it's only going to be triggered on a major addition how many people put a thousand square feet on their house?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:17

Okay, so like my little house which is probably a that's it doesn't affect any just for my own clarity and for

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:14:26

public. Your whole house I think you said was 850 square feet right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:29

I don't know probably

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:14:31

yeah something like that. So you'd be over doubling the size of your house before this would even be a concern.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:35

Yeah no I'm not worried but okay can you give the public and me a summary again exactly what the consequences are if we vote yes

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:14:47

You will require that well Maybe I should have the city attorney stated it. Yeah, if you increase the size of the structure 50% I believe and at least a thousand square feet correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:15:00

Correct Well, there's also things like previously exempted of less than 701 and other provisions like that There's a number of provisions in here

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:15:09

That's also correct. The Fire Protection Districts Ordinance picks up a few points, the one that received the most discussion is the sprinklers requirements. The state trigger for sprinklers is new construction but the fire protection district would go further and require sprinklers on residential occupancies An addition that is greater than both 1,000 square feet and half of the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:33

house.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:15:36

There's further requirements as Councilmember Weirich noted on firewall situations.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:41

And why wouldn't a reasonable person do this voluntarily?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:15:46

Yeah, that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:47

another problem. A bigger water meter?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:07

It's a lot of money. And the benefit-cost issue is...

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:16:12

No, that's it. That's the point. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:16:15

So I mean and wouldn't a better way to handle this is just to have building material that's not so flammable?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:24

That's the direction this council went was hardening. Yeah, we supported that. That what we supported. Yes.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:16:32

Okay are we ready for vote? We're ready for a vote. Okay would you call the roll please?

Roll-call vote 2–2 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Councilmember Francina no council member Haney. Yes, council member Weirich No mayor Johnston. Yes counts the mayor pro tem blasts

now Okay. Well, thank you all for And thank you for coming down and making the pitch Okay our next topic is fire hazard severity zone map so I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:17:11

A virtual card.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:17:14

Yeah, I think it's here. Okay, not daddy so he can go home and get his rest yeah. I know when we interrupted and I apologize for that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:17:25

Mr. Maynard got up fires severity let's go back I'm gonna make you guys feel better about what you did The chief and I would both believe that if you're going to have a firearm, you're going to have a handgun. Saying that you don't need a trigger guard on a .22 but we need a trigger guard on a .38. If you're gonna sprinkler homes, sprinkler homes. This thousand feet, I've always been against. You want to sprinkler it? $25,000 on the remodel, you sprinkler it, you bring everything up, I'm fine. Anyhow fire

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:18:02

severity.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:18:04

If we're talking about the fire severity zone again, the way we have our map and they're right, severity in this area is very great Please don't not adopt what you need to adopt, which is the severity map that blankets because you're concerned about what somebody's doing for insurance. We have a local businessman that had a little smoke plane. He's on Del Oro over by your property.

His insurance rate went up to $13,000 a year. Now a lot of people didn't get canceled because the state law didn't allow cancellations for fire victims for two years after this fire. They're now getting their pink slip and they're getting much, much, much higher. Insurance, so please Don't don't feel sorry for the insurance company. Don't make it affordability issue with an insurance company It's not gonna change by moving the map down what it will do it was allow our building department to go ahead and stipulate more stringent rules And we probably need to come back with some more fire Title IX codes to add into that.

Thank God, Casitas is moving along with this ancient system and they are getting some significant headway with that and we're getting much larger volume pipes. But I think it's really time to adopt outside of SB 50 wieners attempt on the Removal of the r1 zoning. I know that the Severity is one of the outs for that, but we have been asking for a few years prior to this proposal for this new adu zoning that the city become an entire map. Now we've had Doug Campbell, which is the fire behavioralist go through submitted a lot of information. We looked at that information and again with this ember cast 2,000 foot ember cast were only a four square mile down.

And so we're not going to escape one end from the other. So I would ask you to go ahead and adopt the map and make this thing a uniform zone within the city. Thank you.

2:20 – 2:2920 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:20:28

And good night. You got some more stuff? Heidi, come on up.

CommentHeidi WhitmanProposedself-stated2:20:38

Good evening Mayor Johnston, members of the City Council and staff. My name is Heidi Whitman I live at 821 North Signal Street. I'm opposed to the adoption of these self-inflicted very high and severe fire hazard map changes. I respectfully request that a better job be done to identify as the staff report says the unclear additional unintended consequences from this potential change before any additional consideration by your council.

I also, I understand that this has been before the Building Appeal Board and I certainly respect Mr. Daddy but he's also an insurance agent in town and so I believe that he has a conflict of interest when he talks about this matter. I live on North Signal Street and have lived there with my family for 30 years in a 100-year old house. It's 100 years old because it hasn't burned down.

In 30 years, we've been evacuated one time for the Thomas Fire. I'm not aware of any houses in the city limits of Ojai burning down from a wildfire in the 30 years that we have lived here. I am, however, aware of some of the consequences of this designation including greatly increased insurance costs, cancellation of insurance, the impacts on property values or even the ability to sell your home and the impact on housing affordability And I know this firsthand, so I work where the Jesusita fire happened in Santa Barbara about nine years ago.

Our friends in Santa Barbara County who live in this area in modest homes pay $15,000 per year in homeowners insurance premiums. One of our friends, their coverage has been dropped three times and now they can only get homeowner's coverage through the state fair plan. So, I'm asking that you don't self-inflict this on property owners without thorough research on the financial impacts of this change. This was not something that was brought to you by fire officials whom I greatly respect. This is something we're proposing to do to ourselves and so perhaps not all of the insurance companies have yet drawn a circle around Ojai And so for those of us who are still trying to work to live here and raise a family, I ask that you get some additional information before you make this change.

Thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:23:13

Can I ask a quick question? Yeah. Bill? Sure. What was your name? I'm sorry.

CommentHeidi WhitmanProposedself-stated2:23:17

Whitman. Heidi Whitman, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:23:19

I'm sorry. The example you cited, was there some interaction with the local jurisdiction that caused

CommentHeidi WhitmanProposedself-stated2:23:27

Yeah, there was a map change. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:23:29

that happened prior to

CommentHeidi WhitmanProposedself-stated2:23:30

the... Is that what you're saying? I do think that there's probably enough information if someone were to go get it on what the impacts of this are so I certainly believe that the City Council is looking out for all of us but when the staff report says right in it oh we don't really know what the unintended consequences are it makes me think that maybe we need to do some more homework so thank you

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:23:57

Thank you. Okay, this was what on here at a request? Okay yeah okay.

CommentDoug LabarProposedself-stated2:24:10

My name is Doug Labar I live right down the street and It's been a constant march towards solving the lack of affordable housing in California for several years through the passing of legislation I was just looking at SB 1069 in 2016 there was AB 2299 and 2016 and then in last year, there was ab 881 ab 68 and SB 13 now there's SB 50 And all of them are designed to try to get more and more affordable housing in communities that are not providing it.

They're all designed to provide housing to a growing disenfranchised segment of our society And adopting a higher fire hazard severity zone for Ojai will increase insurance rates, allow for possible cancellation of policies and preventing the closing of escrows for lack of ability to obtain fire insurance policies. I've been in this valley since 1974 and I've witnessed The entire valley burned twice.

I mean, I've seen fires march across Sulphur Mountain and all across the North Hills and burned everything. And it never burned the city of Ojai. People within the city there were no homes lost in the city of Ojai. The people who get burned are the people who have, who are living on the transition zone to the wild areas. And on the last issue they were talking you were talking about fire sprinklers It just it occurs to me that the fire sprinklers really protect fires that occur that start inside of a house not the outside of a house and Everybody is so aware of fires right now because of the fires we just had and I They're on the outside.

The fire sprinklers don't stop fires that happen from all the burning embers being swept across from high winds and dryness. So I just wanted to share my thoughts on that. Okay,

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:27:11

thank you Doug. I don't have any more cards and I don' see anymore hands so where are we on the matter?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:27:20

Where is that quote about unintended consequences?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:27:25

It's on page 2. It's the second paragraph from the end.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:27:29

I think it's technically a law.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:27:30

And we have reached out to both insurance companies and other cities, and we haven't been able to get clear answers. So that is something that at this point we don't have clarity on what those consequences could be. Well,

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:27:46

I think historically and I'm not sure what the town was developed at the time. Do we have any fire people here? Fire marshals now where I've been told by the retired fire chief Mr. Roper that there was a fire that burned down to the back of the arcade so it's not like it can't come into town. That's great that it didn't burn down, but I'm just saying that it does burn into towns. My granddaughter lives up in, well did live up in Paradise and everything.

We're faced with a different world. I'm not saying necessarily this is the answer, I'm just pointing out from a factual situation that it has come into the city And fire departments will tell you that the intensity of a fire in a burning structure is substantially greater than the intensity of a fire in the wild lands. Of course, if you've got a blowtorch fire with an east wind, I mean, that trumps everything, no pun intended.

So anyway, this was put on the agenda at the request of two members of the council. That would be a motion and a second or at least some

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:29:03

discussion. Can I have a question? Why is it so difficult to get clear answers to the questions you were asking, do you think? That's a fair question.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:29:15

You mean like what is the answer to like the insurance

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:29:18

companies?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:29:23

It used to be that insurance companies created fire zones and put their ratings based solely on that. I think that the way the world is changing why would an underwriter want You know get involved in the politics of it by saying well, we'll raise your rates What I'm being told? I don't know that this is accurate and I do agree that we should be sure We we know what we're doing. But my understanding is is that there aren't very many if any underwriters you Know interested in writing insurance in this valley anymore.

I Don't know what we do. I guess what is at the fair plan or whatever is where you go to

2:30 – 2:3617 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:30:05

I'm

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:30:18

But that's going to be the source, right? So a regular private insurance company. The answer to the question I guess is that there are a lot of things that...I think that the state doesn't want to get involved in the internal affairs of communities for the same reason on sprinklers. You know it's very controversial. It adds cost what Doug says is correct. I mean everything goes you put in the construction costs I guess what my trouble with the logic of all of it is, is we already have it for everything that is new and everything that's commercial.

And we don't have that many places that are going to want to, other than the idea of the expansion flip and investment in housing. How many houses are getting 1,000 square feet and over 50% expansion in the valley? So maybe it's an issue without a real consequence both ways. To do it or to not do it, but why not doing it when the fire district's recommending. So I don't know how to-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31:19

Can we give a chance to the city manager to maybe weigh in on that too?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:31:22

Sure. Yeah, for the insurance companies, we've had trouble getting anybody to say anything on the record and I just think it comes down to likely will infect rates or insurability and they don't want to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31:35

say that

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:31:36

clearly. Are

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:31:36

there insurance consultants that aren't tied to companies that could give us some clearer answers?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:31:41

We could reach out to someone. I'm just asking. The other thing we've done, the second part of that equation is other cities and so we had heard other cities in the last 16 months since we had previously considered this had looked into the issue. We've reached out to the cities that we had heard of and none of them have actually done it yet either. So we were waiting for someone else to do it to find out what their analysis was. We haven't been able to confirm that any city's done it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:12

I think one of the things that we could look at or ask questions to is, you know we fought two years ago for this community to remove homes that were in the high flood zones. Ray Grant did that to protect individuals in our community from having to pay more on insurance so the question is how is that different from creating now a high fire zone? So maybe we need to ask the question, did insurance rates go up in Ojai or would have they gone up in Ojai if we had not fought for those reductions in the flood areas? Because to me it's the same. If you're in a high flood zone, you're going to pay more. Maybe Bob wants to talk to that but you're going to pay more for insurance.

So if you're in a high-fire zone, why wouldn't you assume? You're gonna make you're gonna pay more for insurance They're definitely gonna pay less and I and I think that there's if the goal is to harden off Existing homes. I think we can do that in a different manner or we could do that through our codes Without having to go through something like this so I think there's I think there's a way of balancing it so that we're not Enforcing unintended consequences and we really think through what we want to harden off in our construction practices In the community. So I think that might be the better way to go on this

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:33:31

And and we did do the codes this most recent building cycle We adopted the re-roof requirements and some other requirements

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:33:39

Okay, that might be something we send back to BAB and have them discuss internalize and come back to us with more Areas in the community that we can harden off in the construction aspects

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:33:48

Ryan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:33:59

That come up with the fire severity and all these other things. The insurance companies that look at it, they're independent. They'll give you all the answers you want.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:34:12

I just want to make a couple of things clear in my opinion on this. I think it's kind of strange that We are disagreeing with the fire protection district on Fire sprinklers and then we are going with potentially adding the whole city into High Fire Zone. That seems very hypocritical in some way, but I want to make a couple of things clear this SB 50 was brought up. I don't believe this would affect the application of SB 50 to Ojai because it is done locally creating a high fire zone locally does not exempt you from SB 50 or make that clear to everyone. The other thing is.

This literally says in our packet that we don't know what this is going to do. We literally don't know Now, I don't know how. I mean, I just don't know how if we don't have any idea what this is actually going to do from unintended consequences to even it doesn't say building changes what they would actually be. It just says that we could have higher standards says it could lead to more costs.

We have the second highest median home price sale in Cal in this in the county. We have this constant housing cost issue I just don't know how we could, it seems, I don't personally think I could vote for something without really understanding the consequences and it's not clear on here that there is any specific benefit to this. So unless we want to get information that's going to answer those questions, I feel I'd be irresponsible to vote for it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:35:46

I think we need more research. I'd like to just continue the item until we get some more complete information, you know everything from the SB 50 issue to the issue of insurance ratings to the issue of what's the implications in terms of setting us up for better hardening? Yeah, you're right, we don't understand enough but I think we need more information

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:10

I can't say passing this would make Ojai any safer. All I can say is it might make it more expensive and we don't have any more information than that, and that seems like a very difficult thing to stand behind especially when we just talked about the cost-effectiveness of sprinklers and the fire people saying hey they want that they're not even here saying they need

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:36:26

those. You know there's other like does it qualify us for you know applications for assistance that we'd mind otherwise not Thank you.

2:36 – 2:4429 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:36:47

Because obviously we're trying to raise the cost of things and if we do raise the cost, we want to be sure we're safer because of it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:55

Only less than Westlake if you wanted to know.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:36:58

Okay. We'll go to the, let's see... We've continued item number eight so we go to number nine and says requests from two council members to discuss...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:37:07

Did I miss seven?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:37:08

No,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:37:09

we're on seven

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:37:09

now. Oh I'm sorry yeah I jumped it. Solar energy options for city facilities

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:37:15

Yeah, and this item is actually it's on the agenda. I think you know I'm confident that it's an item that council would support. It's basically on the agenda because it will require a decent amount of staff time more than a typical RFP so it's on the agenda to basically have council Tell us to prioritize this project appropriately. But the idea is with all of the other climate resiliency efforts that we're putting into place, one thing that we haven't done yet is looked into solar power options including panels, battery backup and or microgrid opportunities.

Late last year Councilmember Haney and Councilmember Wyrick did assemble a group of stakeholders who started looking into this and they have done the initial research on some different options. We're at the point where we can move forward with getting some information but it would require doing an energy audit Developing an RFP which for solar power can be fairly technical and it takes a little more effort than a standard RFP. So this item is just on the agenda because it will be a decent amount of staff time, but I'm confident.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:38:37

Can you outsource so it's not such a burden on the staff?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:38:40

Yeah, that's actually an option we can. I think we could do it within the city manager's authority so that...I think we're having some issues with our community development department where we've really cut back on contract planning so we are kind of limited right now so this would be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:38:58

a good option. I understand and it's just I'm just thinking but I mean to me this is an example of the kind of thing that we can more seriously consider if Measure C passes

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:39:07

Right,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:39:08

yes.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:39:09

And this would fit in with those categories of projects that could be funded?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:39:13

So we're going to know soon and I'm wondering if maybe we could take some baby steps there and see if she passes because I don't like very sensitive the issue Thank you

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:39:41

We may need either way. I mean, I think an energy audit of the city's facilities and some of these other things seem like I don't care whether measure C passes right they might need to be done anyway sooner than

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:39:49

later. That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:39:50

true We

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:39:51

actually have we are talking to an intern right now that that we're gonna have work on this too but The energy audit is a good point that that's good to move forward But the other thing is that there are options That have been identified like the power purchase agreements that won't have upfront costs, right? So it's not necessarily only doable with measure C but measures he would definitely help and so I think we There it's worth us finding out what those proposals would be because there may be some that that we can start working on Right away. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:25

So it would be maybe a good idea to prioritize a couple of things we can do in the interim and then come back and approve the rest later for the, especially the RFP process sounds like it might be more complicated or is that the best most efficient way to go about it?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:40:38

I think the idea of authorizing us to proceed with the RFP process, whether it's through staff or if it could be done through an administrative agreement under the city manager's authority which means under $25,000 which it should be. If we can get the authority to do that moving forward, we can start getting that information. And be prepared to move forward in the next couple

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:41:03

months.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:41:03

I support that.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:41:04

Okay, I would move that we do that. Do we have a second? Second. Okay is there any... Well, I don't know You can talk over hi I

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:41:42

It's always been my assumption that you can call SCE and ask them for an energy audit at no cost. And they'll be able to provide you current performance, past performance, increased performance, and what happened with our new alliance with the green energy issue and what we're paying. I don't know why that doesn't start immediately. The other thing is when you bring up C, I'm very concerned. I'm just highly concerned If we go with the power purchase and you go with somebody like Spur, we can't even buy the system for seven years. That is the agreement that's just locked in. That's just the way it is.

And I don't see how we can spend Measure C money for costs that we're not going to incur should we go with that route because there will be no upfront cost. So when you start looking in that, please make sure we vet that and don't send mixed messages. Because my assumption was that measure C was gonna be earmarked money for certain things. And we were not gonna hand it out to this coalition and that coalition and this cooperative- I think anyone suggested that. In that study as we do. This thing is gonna be for infrastructure for things we need roads, code, fire abatement.

So I'm going to go ahead and get started. For an energy audit and I wouldn't know why that wouldn't be the first step. If you're going to have these other outside people come into an energy audit, I think that's great because we can do an aggregated system here between the lower maintenance yard and all the way around and that's kind of a different issue. So, I would hope as part of your measure that you start an energy audit with somebody immediately because it doesn't matter whether C goes through or not. What matters is we're going to have to just go with solar. That's just the way it's going to be and the faster we start, the faster we get done.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:43:50

Step one is getting a hold of Edison and seeing what services could be immediately provided.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:43:56

The reason that's on the agenda is because we've been told we need council approval to authorize the energy audit from the energy audit provider.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:44:05

So, we have a second in motion to do just that?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:44:07

Yeah.

2:44 – 2:5019 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:44:13

We spent a lot of time investigating this. Mainly your instigation. I commend you for that. First of all, again, I know the names are in here but we should thank Christopher Whelan, we should thank Jamie Fleming, we should thank Bob Daddy, we should thank Jim Selman. There was a lot of effort and we should There's a lot of energy put into this and I think we have to look at this as phases.

You know, we're looking at solarizing the municipal fatalities first and then looking at how us leaning hopefully that inspires residential people to do it and inspires commercial entities to do it. The other part of this is the biggest part of this is the battery backup system so if we're looking Measure C funds. I'm looking at measure C funds down the road for battery support and that technology and how it can be integrated but right now Companies like the spur, I know that you We could probably give you guys more information on that but forefront power. I thought James that they were willing to do the The energy audit of the facilities for free So there's things, aside from what Mr. Daddy said that there are entities here that would be willing to do that for us and in fact they weren't the only one.

We interviewed about four of these companies and they all pretty much were in agreement that they would help in that. The other part of it is with companies like Forefront and Spur, they integrate their RFP into their contract. So they have the technical knowledge and they have that the past RFPs that they could pass on to us. So again we could cut the cost down considerably by going with someone like that if we go, if we go with systems like that so there's some substantial savings and I agree with Bob that this needs something and it sounds like councils behind it that we need to move on quickly

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:46:14

Okay, is there any objection to the motion? If not... Are we financing it? Well are we spending any money or are we just authorizing it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:46:25

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:46:27

this doesn't require a recorded individual vote.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:46:30

Okay, so if there is... I see no objection to the motion. So the staff is so directed and

let's move to item number nine and this is potential expansion of the skate park lease. Since two council members have asked for it, would one of them like to?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:46:53

Yeah we can speak up on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:46:55

Yeah, but the reason I'm looking towards the city manager is we had a conversation where I believe he's had some preliminary evaluation and actual discussion with the school superintendent on this matter. And I thought it might be a good way to start.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:47:10

Yes, so the the item is to is the request from two council members to discuss potential expansion and extension of the skate park lease from the school district and Although the superintendent could not be here today. She had a previously scheduled conference we have met and already began discussions the school district is open to Some Ideas and actually has some ideas. So we Wonderful,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:47:37

yeah, we we can move it forward And the idea was just to authorize the city manager do engage in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:43

that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:47:45

That's all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:47:47

so I just wanted a mirror Randy I Just wanted to touch on you know, I think one of the One of the things I'm hearing, the pushback is the fact that you can't have food sources with other activities. And so I've inquired with my brother-in-law down in La Jolla because their Sunday market has food, has music and has apparel houseware. It's a big farmer's market.

So I didn't want that to be an impediment and so I've asked them to give me some information on how they do it, how they've done it down there. And again, I think that would be part of our inquiries as to how to get around that on the front end rather than waiting till the back end and say oh by the way you can't do this because you can't mix these environments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:48:41

I want to make it very clear, I consider these discrete considerations. Looking at the long-term status of this institution, the skate park, looking at possible ways of enhancing parking capacity where we need it as well as some money that could be going to the school system. Farmers market the commemorative plaque. Those are all discrete issues, so it's not an all or none I want to make it very clear I just want to get the thought we could authorize a city manager to Understand that we are behind him in these discussions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:49:13

Yeah, I will make the comment that since we have had discussions although They were preliminary even though they were five years old with the school district about that particular property I just think we ought to be I don't know. We just don't know what's going to happen with that property, and I want us to move into something that's not consistent or impedes the ability of what may happen there. I think we ought to just be cognizant of that although I think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:49:35

looking into it is appropriate. There's nothing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:49:36

irrevocable

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:49:37

here in my suggestion is just make it clear.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:49:43

And as far and as far as the second issue regarding the plaque, I just want to state I'm in complete favor. I think it's a Mr. Daddy's here and from the Hilgers family and everyone especially the loss of Chris Hilgers recently They just really did an amazing job I still want to give you and the Hilgers all the credit they deserve for all the effort that went into the skate park So I am definitely supportive of that when we bring it back

2:50 – 2:5523 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:50:12

I think I'm fine with this. We give direction to engage in discussion forward

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:50:20

we have right now

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:50:32

As the incorporator of Skate Ojai, we turned in our reincorporation paper to be compliant with the state and the Internal Revenue Service like few other Little Community groups literally do I would ask you to review the lease outside of any other endeavors you have It's time what I would ask you to do is engage with school outside of any other change of venue additional property parking, whatever first let's get that skate park so we have some time but State law requires, and I'm going to have the learned gentlemen interject themselves when they need to. State law requires that we can't get certain grants for facilities that have less than 20 years of life.

And that's one of the problems we've had in getting shade and getting other things that we would like to put in there. Getting in a drinking fountain, just a number of things. We could have been applying for recreational grants forever but we couldn't get Mr. Clark and you know couple of the clowns at this at the school district now to get together Tim Baird and you know those guys that had the big dump.

We're all neighbors.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:51:53

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:51:54

we're all neighbors

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:51:55

Bob anymore Thank you for not referring to us as Some of the clouds you'll get to it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:52:03

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:52:05

what I would like you to do is I would like you to give To make sure that the children of this community that you know have the most used outside of Gymnastics the most huge facility in this valley Permanently use that we can continue to have that all those things that councils before Said were all these horror stories that we were going to have just haven't happened And and it's good use for the kids and it's been good. And then the other thing I'd like my Public officials over here or my city staff to review Mr. Clark forbade Food at the skate park what I understood is we got our fingers bent off a little When we had a food truck that showed up that was at the chiropractor's office That was selling food and the city went in and cited the truck only to find out that number one The state of California Controls the license on the vehicle Number two, the county Health Department controls the food license and the city had no authority right And so we have put a prohibition and a ban on something where we never had the authority.

And so it appears to me if some small little hot dog truck shows up at the skate park on Saturday, they're within the law and the kids can go over need a hot dog. So just I don't know why we would come up with all these rules. And I wish you would you would put on the agenda or make an effort or ask your city manager to See what we can do about getting a lease that will allow us to file for grants.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:53:56

Absolutely.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:53:57

Okay, for improvements because it's time for repair and I would rather get a grant for repair than take it out of our pretty tough budget.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:54:06

I agree. Thank you Well, you know there's a huge benefit mayor to bringing that that showed on Sunday to the center of our town and getting them used to that facility being the hub in the center of our town. There's a good reason to do that started early. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:54:26

right good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:54:26

luck have fun!

CommentJeff OtterbeinProposedself-stated2:54:28

Okay

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:54:30

so where are we on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:54:35

Consensus direction would be sufficient to move it forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:54:44

I make a motion for consensus direction.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:54:48

You know some of my colleagues are for this and some of them are opposed to it, and I stand behind my colleagues. Does the staff have enough?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:55:00

We call that a mutual consent.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:55:02

Okay so okay item is concluded council member reports this is not mandatory but it's an opportunity any okay city manager report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:55:16

Well, I'm going to say something that warms Susan's heart. Oh? I have asked as a board member for VRSD and I managed to convince them this was serious that we need to look at wildfire mitigation at the landfills. We've had three of them burned over costing millions of dollars in damage and we need to look at things in a new way in terms of wildfire mitigation including goats

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:55:43

Oh, okay. Now I get the part that warms my heart. The same thing the Fireside Council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:55:49

is. Don't fence me in. You know, the Reagan Library says that's what saved them.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:56 – 3:0145 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:56:03

Since we are warming Suze's heart, the Chamber of Commerce and I'm gonna get it wrong. I think it's either every other Sunday or Thursday but they've started having the Humane Society bring puppies for adoption into the park so on...I can't remember exactly what Sunday is please look it up because I'll say it wrong but you can come down and good luck not leaving with one but it's a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:56:23

pretty cool.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:56:26

I wanted to just mention the items that we tentatively have scheduled for the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:56:29

next meeting. We have a pretty full stacked agenda at this point.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:56:52

We continue the ATP item to the next meeting. So that'll be first we also have a Landmarking of the 1104 Foothill Road that was recommended by the HPC at their last meeting the minor work permit timeline Coming back for historic permits. We have animal keeping that just got approved All right recommended by the Planning Commission.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:15

I want to ask about that

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:57:16

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:17

and then

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:57:20

Well, we have a couple of just housekeeping things like the delegation for the SCAG conference coming up and the commissioner item coming back. So that's all I have to report at this point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:37

Can I ask, maybe I'll meet with you but I wanted to postpone. Is there anything urgent about putting animal keeping on the agenda? The reason I ask is I really want to put a lot more energy into it. I went to all the Planning Commission meetings and I would like to meet with some of the animal people and go over it So that we really have the best possible ordinance. And I've been involved lately in some animal abuse cases that are hard for the Humane Society to prosecute because of the way the laws read, there's some vagueness.

So could we move that item?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:58:14

We were trying to move it through quickly at Council's request so if council is okay with the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:58:20

There's no longer an oppressing issue with the horses.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:58:23

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:58:24

and that way in the ATP will take up some considerable time and And it's also possible bill that you and I will have that letter done. Oh

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:58:35

I'm still waiting for my revision. I did write the last one, I'm on pins and

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:58:41

needles.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:58:45

And Suze I'm happy that you want to do this thing but I just want to understand it if the planning is making a recommendation back to council

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:58:55

That recommendation will come to Council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:58:57

Shouldn't that come for a discussion prior to you interjecting yourself into

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:59:02

it? No, it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:59:03

has to come to us as passed.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:59:05

Yeah the Planning Commission's recommendation will come to council but I'm understanding that you want time to review it with different interested groups but...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:59:12

You want more time to get ready to weigh in at that

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction2:59:14

time. So is there any objection to this letting Susan... It'll come to us Randy when she gets around to it It'll come to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:20

us. It could be the next one, there's no pressing reason to have it next time and there are some other...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:59:27

I agree

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:28

with you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:59:28

Yeah. Well like I said my concern is that it's not going to be revised by you, it's gonna come to us as a whole? No, no, no! It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:34

gonna come just as it is. It's just that I would like to go over some points with Jolene and I have a commission meeting at Ventura County Animal Services on February 13th I just have some questions to

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:59:49

ask. And then I understand the concern and we'll make sure that Planning Commission's recommended ordinance comes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:59:54

forward. Not a revised.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:59:57

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:57

I've already interjected myself anyway. Matt said I could.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:00:03

Future agenda items, Bill? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00:06

have three. Okay. Three requests. One is I do think that we ought Do a solicitation of the neighbors' feedback with respect to our new recreational facility, The Pickleball. Very successful, very popular and it's because of the popularity that I think we ought to do that. We ought to solicit some feedback. When we get the feedback maybe think about some possible mitigations like operating hour regulations or possible sound regulations And it's just how you handle something that's overwhelmingly successful is what we put on the

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:00:41

agenda. When that came before us, was it Tim? Krauss? Is that the name? I thought he or somebody from that group said that the pickleball industry or whatever it's called now Has a ball and in paddle

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00:57

This

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:01:00

is exceeding the noise thing then they that maybe has to be a requirement

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:01:04

That's what I wanted

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:01:06

to say too that the if it does exceed the decibel limit And I don't know where the city has done anything on that, but this is our own property We can't we just can't lead by such a poor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:01:16

example There's different ways of measuring sound so we do it. Yeah, it's something to put on the agenda

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:01:25

Somehow the city measures sound when somebody makes a complaint because we hand out tickets on us I'm pretty sure we know how to do it Now we're for our own property. We're gonna well, you know who knows how you measure the sound clearly launching into discussion of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:01:36

the item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:01:36

not on the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:01:37

agenda There's two types of noises going on

3:01 – 3:0730 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:01:46

We've got a request to have that issue come back. Obviously the gentleman who brought it to our attention, is that McRae? Ron does not want us to wait a long while to do it so...

not transcribed≈23s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:02:14

Yeah, we were kind of working on this as part of the soft opening leading up to a grand opening type period so we can bring this back. We're expecting to do some of this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:02:27

work. We all might want to address housing values in the area and see how they've gone up and down over

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:02:32

that. Can I get to number two?

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:02:34

Please go to number

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:02:35

two. This is serious. You know, I'm very serious. We have a serious problem with the green waste We have a vacant county site. We have other uses coming in every day that, you know, people are proposing and serious people are proposing in terms of what could be done. I would like the city manager to at least approach the county about what their reaction would be to discussion about leasing the Baldwin Road site.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:03:09

Well, it is available. The question is who's going to lease it? No, I've had the city

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:03:14

lease it. We get a report back about the options about leasing that facility directly as a city for purposes of handling what we have right now is completely opposite to what we're supposed to be doing with climate emergency in terms of reducing carbon footprint with the green waste situation plus there was other Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:03:55

The other thing that we have to look at is what are other cities doing and I think Go Lead or Santa Barbara actually has a recycling center program that we might want to look at. And two, we probably need to price tub grinders or the ability to lease tub grinders. That's your large chipping units. So you're either going to own them or you're gonna rent them And that's what they were doing there. They had a grinder on a rotational basis. I just want

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:04:23

to report back from the city manager. We just want to ask this, does it have to go back on the agenda? Can they just have the staff get the information and distribute it to us? Unless we have a plan. This is a huge thing you're talking about. Us going into the business of recycling and green waste. It's fraught with issues. It has a history in the county not just here in this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:04:52

valley. And

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:04:53

we declared

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:04:53

a climate emergency and this is a big step backwards. There's something we can do about it.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:04:58

Okay, I'd like to see the business plan. Well, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:05:00

agree

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:05:01

but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:05:01

you have to put on the agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:05:03

Maybe in our city survey yard, but that might get confused with pickleball

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:05:07

okay? I would support the idea of having them manager give us a report back if somebody has a If somebody has a business plan there which have a proposal of how this would work Otherwise we I don't see how we could do that in a council meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:05:23

And in consideration of you, Mayor, I'm going to not mention my third one. We are bringing

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:05:28

back the battery

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:05:45

I think that

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:05:51

we are going to need to give some structure to the agenda process. We used to have one, I have to confess that I did come up with the idea of letting us all do this at council meetings thinking that way we wouldn't have just one or two people Beating on the city manager, but there should be an actual Anything we're gonna put on the agenda should actually have a report that goes with it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:06:15

Yes

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:06:16

So so those of us who want to put something on the agenda need to outline that sort of thing before We decide we're going to put it on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:06:26

Investigation we put a lot of time and effort before we brought it back to council.

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:06:30

Yeah This was suggested to me that we have a time limit, but maybe we should have a numbers limit. It's hard to determine how long each item will take the more structure We give to it the more items we can have the more just you know loose conversation We're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:06:53

gonna have to draw straws on that because some people raise their hand faster and speak quicker I'm gonna

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:06:59

look down at this Okay, and Bill has waived his third idea until next week or something. Yes I have. Wait wait

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:07:11

wait! I want to hear from Chief Jose Rivera how his first two weeks was. Come on!

3:07 – 3:073 turns

GuestJose RiveraProposed · by introduction3:07:23

Right, okay. The meeting's adjourned but we want the chief to talk to us. Well you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:07:26

made the meeting so it's not a strike, it's not a nick against you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:07:42

We're done for tonight.

not transcribed≈28s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen