UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:1534 turns
Right, James? Are
we on, James? Yep. Good to go.
Okay. I will call the meeting of the Ojai City Council to order. Will the clerk please call the roll?
Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 3
Show transcript
Okay, we have a quorum Any changes in the agenda?
Nope.
If not, we will consider the agenda approved as submitted by the city manager. We held at 730 so we'll go to consent calendar. Is there a second?
Second.
I'm glad that Randy is enjoying council for the first time since I've
Well, you gave us that little heads up about what your wife was seeing and you stood up.
All right, something
happened I
guess. I'm glad I could bring a smile to your face. Let's go to the discussion item number two Mr. City Manager. You have an update on the virus situation or pandemic?
Yes thank you. Take one second here to pull something up.
Oh, I lost my picture.
That's me. What you should be seeing is a presentation. So we're trying something new. No, I see Zoom. I don't see anything else.
Try
turning your camera on again. There's little icon. I do that sometimes at the bottom.
What should be showing on the screen right now is, it should say coronavirus impact slash or dash cash flow. Right. So I'll give you a second.
Bill where's the camera? Right there? There's some kind of an icon down at the bottom. Yeah
let me go back
I think if you turn it off sometimes there's an icon at the bottom, you can push that. Randy is back. Yeah, I see Randy.
He can't see anything now. Oh he can't see anything? I think he may have muted the app. So how do I change that? Look down on your taskbar on the bottom and you should see a window for Zoom and click on that.
A window for Zoom? Or an icon.
On the left hand side at the bottom, there's a microphone that says mute and another one that said stop video.
Yeah I have Windows, I have the mute, I have Wi-Fi full charge. Oh is this it here?
Okay so you're seeing it until we share the screen let's see. There we go. I'm gonna hit share. There you go. Can you still see it Randy?
Cool. I don't know, it's dangerous to let Dara take a walk, Randy. Tell me.
Let's thank everyone at home for putting up with that. She found her way to Johnny's house. Thanks everybody for your patience. This is a tutorial on Zoom rather than council meeting.
Yeah so we recently on Friday we had a budget committee meeting so we wanted to start by talking just quickly about what high level What we talked about at that meeting. I think it was useful and the Budget Committee, I think appreciated the information so we wanted to make sure to provide it to Council as well. So we'll talk about this which is more budget focused but then we'll also talk about some of the actions that the city's working on. We'll start with just a high-level overview And so I just want to start. We've talked about this a little bit, but obviously right now many businesses are closed. Hotels are closed. Restaurants are limiting their operations. Everybody in the city is impacted which includes the City of Ojai. We expect revenues for the city to be reduced $1.2 million through May 31st and as we start moving through this you know the question is going to be how long that continues or if things begin to reopen So we're looking at right now, you know, conservative estimate of $1.2 million reduction in our revenues if June were to remain closed, if things were to remain closed through June which we don't know yet but it would be another $500,000 impact on the city and so the other point just to make is that we all know that TOT is a big revenue source for us but Other thing we're seeing right now is that sales tax revenues are going to be reduced.
And many agencies, the state has talked about deferring a collection of even the revenues that we would typically receive. So we're expecting to be impacted. We're always looking for ways to communicate with the state and the federal government about the needs of small cities I think Everybody's heard by now that the funding that the CARES Act provides has been identified for cities larger than 500,000 people which we are obviously not but also no city in Ventura County is that size. So Ventura County cities thus far have not received any support so about 20 minutes before this meeting we were talking to the League of Cities and we are planning to put in a letter of support State requesting funding from some of that funding, but at this time we don't have any guarantee of receiving any of that.
We also noted that property tax may be impacted because we're expecting some people there's going to be a lot of deferral requests and perhaps non-payments. And so the other point we want to make is that if hotels and stores return in June which would be a good scenario, we'd still need We plan to not receive any revenues until August because it would take time. They'd have to collect taxes in June, and then they'd have July to remit them to the city so we'd likely get them in August.
So there's definitely a time period we need to make sure that we are able to continue to provide services for without revenues coming in. One thing we did at the Budget Committee was we talked about...we always talk about our annual budget being $10 million But we realized for a short term problem like this, hopefully it's a short term problem that it really is not useful to talk about our $10 million budget. It's more useful to talk month-to-month costs and revenues.
So we went through our budget. We put together this average monthly expense sheet. And it gives you a feel for what the city typically spends and what it's spending those funds on. The average monthly expenses are about $830,000 per month. 340,000 goes to employee costs and 275,000 go to sheriff services. So those two items alone account for over 600,000 of the 800,000 we spend every month. So it becomes very clear very quickly if we end up needing to make cuts or reductions there's not a lot So, you know, we laid out some of the other things. We spent about $18,000 a month on average on recreation programs, $50,000 on miscellaneous operating expenses, $80,000 on our contract building services and a little bit on planning and public works there, $46,000 13,000 per month on community organization funding.
So that makes up our expenses. We came to council a couple... Our last meeting and we talked about 150,000 in cuts. And so again, we wanted to show that monthly because monthly that's 150,000 annually. So what really that comes down to is about 50,000 a month that we cut which again if you go back to our total expenses being 830,000 That's a decent reduction, but it still means we're spending $775,000 a month.
James real quick just if you don't mind, but we're showing $81,000 in contract services yet we're only showing a $15,000 reduction would that be an area that you would look more closely at?
So one of the challenges with our contract services are our building fees are the bulk of them and The arrangement where every dollar that they bring in we split. So it's a challenge because if you reduce those services, it also means we're bringing in less revenue, if that makes sense. They're only getting paid if they bring revenue in I guess is kind of the way to explain it. We've looked at reducing things like our contract planning because that's just an extra cost Harmon Zuckerman, PB – He, Him, His): With building if they're bringing money in. They get a percentage of it so that you know and some some ways we don't want them to reduce too much because that means we're bringing lesson so Harmon Zuckerman, PB – He, Him, His.: : And that's those are the fees charged on, you know, building permits and things which the one point I would make from that is that we are still offering all services at the city besides the recreation programs which can be operated currently But we're still offering all services at our city.
We're still offering building and planning, building and safety public works services which is something we're proud of a lot of cities have gone to minimal services. So potential savings, we brought the savings last month those savings the 23,000 per month for the hiring freeze, the 15,000 per month for kind of a miscellaneous category there A $20,000 per month saving for part-time employees. So we've made some reductions. I think it comes out to about 8%.
There's other possibilities. We talked about these at the budget committee and started talking about them at a high level but we aren't recommending any drastic cuts at this point. The challenge is we're anticipating this as a short term issue and so making long term Cuts to resolve a short-term issue would not be the optimal situation. We are hoping with these cuts and with the reserves that we do have, that we can weather the storm but it's going to be tight.
And to that point, we have about $5.3 million available and we've always said, we've talked about this a lot recently, we have $3.4 million in reserves so that is still true We had 1.9 million in our various checking accounts, essentially. So we have about 5.3 million when you start doing the math. If we're spending $775,000 or so, we have about five to six months cash flow.
But to remind everybody this emergency began in mid-March. So six months from mid-March puts us in mid-September. So if everything resolves as we expect, you know, we'd weather the storm. But we need to stay diligent and continue to monitor it. We're not complacent with this for sure. And then as mentioned before and I noted here that we're continuing to advocate for emergency funding. A lot of cities are running into issues where they have one or two months of cash flow going to be advocating aggressively. So I think if we can all work together on that, we'd be likely to get some funding for small cities.
Mayor may I ask James a question on that point? Sure Bill go. James you know the county it's not it's not cities its jurisdiction under the CARES Act of 500 000 and more I believe and of course the county is the only what over 500 000 all the cities are under 500 there's a lot of counties like that My understanding is Ventura County has made it very clear, it's not gonna act as a fiscal agent to distribute some of that relief that the county is getting to the cities. Is that true of every county in a similar situation? Do we have any information on that? That's a
good question. I will say we asked our city or accounting leaders meeting with the other city managers in the county. We asked the county if they planned to distribute and the answer was to distribute to the smaller cities which Again, to be clear all of the cities in Ventura County are considered small. And the answer was no that it's not going to be distributed to those cities at this time under this round of funding.
We don't know if that's universal or common in other counties and the same situation? I haven't looked into other counties to see what they've done. You've got enough today. I was just wondering if you heard anything. Thank you. It's worth looking up we'll look into it. Santa Barbara is in a similar situation. I think every city in Santa Barbara County is below 500,000. Yeah
0:15 – 0:3032 turns
i think so
and so it's only the county that would have the uh meet the 500 maybe just one call to Santa Barbara and see what they're doing see if this is time
we could do that yeah we'll check in with them
yeah
um
Mayor
Nancy Pelosi said over the weekend that there's supposed to be another round of funding appeared for cities that the federal government is looking at passing again they purposely And the word was they purposely didn't touch cities in the last round because they're expecting another round. So we'll see, but that's supposed to be I think where circumvention of that county issue is supposed to be taken care of in another round of funding.
Yeah, we've heard that too so we're gonna we're starting early getting letters in and things like that just to get the funding
Mayor, can we go back a page? I just wanted to have James expand a little bit on this other savings and we have negotiating something with the sheriff's contract. I don't know what that would look like. Community organizations so you're looking at what the museum are we looking All the Green Coalition, things of that nature. Chamber of Commerce and then what do you when you talk about 10% reduction of each department? How would you is that just furloughs? What are you doing? What are you looking at there?
Yes, there's several different options we would look at other cities have gone to furloughs. Some have limited office hours, things like that. At our at this point We're starting to think about those things and putting a plan together if we need to. But with the current discussion about the timeline for reopening, we don't think that we'll need to go in you know will need to do any of those ones but it's just everything with this changes so quickly that if there is a change immediately we'd have a plan in place You know, depending on how much we need to see.
Randy at the Budget and Finance Committee, we asked the finance officer James to as the beginning of our budget deliberations to enumerate all the mandatory services that we provide and the things that we have to either provide or that in some cases the funding is restricted so that can only be used for certain activities. And then there are things of discretionary And they're kind of two kinds of discretionary. There's level of service on the mandatory side, but then there are...
Oh, Johnny you muted, Mayor Johnston you muted I'm sorry. Can you unmute him? Oh, I think we lost Mayor Johnston
I'll send him a note.
Okay,
who turned my mic off? Okay, where was I in my little diatribe there? I was just saying that the Finance Committee asked the staff. Am I still on the air? Yes. We asked the staff if they would start working on lists that distinguish between the activities that we have to provide and then we can analyze those as to the level of service that we provide under the mandatory side and then we have the discretionary side Which is the stuff that we choose to do that we may or may not be able to fund. And then when we get into the budget process next month, we'll be able to kind of hone this down and then eventually it gets down to contracts and payroll.
Well, I guess what I was looking at and thank you for that explanation Mayor. I was also looking at when we talk about 10% reductions, we had just this year on this fiscal year moved everyone back up to 40 hours. So I was looking at if we did a 10% reduction on those 40 hour employees now we're back to 36. And if we wanted to achieve 20%, then we'd be down to 30. So we're not laying employees off. What we're doing is reducing hours of Employees working so it's I was just wondering if that how you were looking at that James.
Yeah, that's something we've analyzed and considered um right now like like i said i'm repeating but the with the timeline that we've all been kind of hearing you know from uh recent state updates in the county taking some steps towards reopening as they as they called it last week where You know, we had prepared for the worst case scenario but it's sounding like it's not the worst case scenario. But we'll keep watching it and adjust as needed. We do have our first budget workshop is scheduled for May 12th.
And one of the funky things that happened with this is that we're in April 28 today I believe and we're about at the end of our fiscal year so In some ways, it's bad because there's not a lot of savings we can meet in one month this year. But on the other hand, it's good timing as far as allowing us to consider all these things in our budget discussion which will begin at our next council meeting.
The last slide that we talked about is that we have contacted our bank to investigate a potential line of credit for emergency usage if this continues longer than expected. And so, we've started to look into that. It's purely for cash flow. So, we will continue Look into that and determine if that's an option. We talked about it at the Budget Committee, and the Treasurer and Finance Director agreed to review our investments which are these $3.4 million here listed as CDs.
We believe that our interests that we receive off of those investments are lower than what we would pay for a loan so you know we would anticipate The line of credit would be a worst case scenario, not to be used unless this really continues long. But we wanted to let everybody know that that's something we're looking into. And so essentially after all this the message we're trying to get across is the key issue right now facing us is cash flow issues. It's facing every city in the county no matter how well off it is having these same kinds of issues and discussions We're going to keep watching closely, monitoring and adjusting as needed.
One point I'll make is these reductions here that we've already implemented, I think come out to about 8%. So we've already made some significant reductions and we're looking at other options. So we went over that with the budget committee as well. And we wanted to give a high level overview of that here If there's any questions on that, I'd be happy to take them. The second part will be focused on some of the actions that we're taking in the next couple weeks.
Okay do we have any other questions for James on this before he gets into the specific actions being taken during the
pandemic? My comment, Mayor would be thank you James for your thoughtfulness and thanks the finance committee for looking at this and working with James and the director. I really appreciate the information and i'm sure the community if they're watching enjoys it too and it's much needed so thank you guys.
Thank you okay so with that we had a whole Timeline from March 13th to now, but I know it's in the report and people are probably tired of hearing it. So I'll just skip to the items that are upcoming. We're continuing several actions. One thing we wanted to mention because it's a resource that became available last week that I think would be really useful to certain people within the Valley is we've been communicating with the county Chamber of Businesses about some of the programs available.
They just announced that the County Area Agency on Aging is offering a full service food and supply pantry at no cost for residents that are 60 or older, and people with disabilities. They'll provide a two week food supply by delivery and information is available at 805-477-7300 so We just wanted to get that out. One of the questions we get a lot is how seniors are gonna be able to get food under these circumstances, so that I think is a critical need. Moving past- Oh, I'm sorry. Would you repeat the phone number for those listening at home? Yes, it's 805-477-7300.
It's open to Ventura County residents 60 or older. But moving past that some of the things we've been working on One thing we've been working on currently is the county's order from April 20th encouraged certain exercise activities such as golfing, tennis, pickleball, walking, hiking, running, bicycling, pleasure driving and working around places of residence such as gardening.
Now the reason why we're bringing this up is In the order they had laid out specific requirements for golfing to be reopened, which was helpful. And Sewell Park reopened immediately because those requirements were in place. They did not lay out requirements for tennis and pickleball. It's more complicated than it sounds because of questions like are we going to allow doubles play? How many people do we allow on a court at one time?
How do you maintain six feet of social distancing? So what we've done to address that, we've done a few things. We plan to reopen on May 2nd which is Saturday and when we reopen on May 2, we are going to have hand sanitizing stations in place for each court. One at Upper Libby, one at Lower Libby and then one at the Pickleball Courts. And we are going to have signage and I have an example here in front of me I don't know if it'll show, but we're going to have signage posted that has rules and guidelines.
And one rule we wanted to note that maybe not everybody will be happy with is we are planning to allow single play only to start with doubles. And we looked into it. We looked up the US Tennis Association guidelines And the Pickleball Association's guidelines, and they each noted that doubles play is not encouraged at the moment. So we're going to follow that and go with single play only. And there's several other requirements, but that's I think the key one.
So we're going to reopen the courts on May 2nd. As I mentioned, Sewell Park has reopened We are opening, we are planning to open the parking lot at Serzotti Park but the barbecue pits shade structures and playgrounds will remain closed. The skate parks and the children's playgrounds at both Sarzotti and Libbey Park will remain closed. And the reason with those is the shared equipment in the groups you know encouraging people into small groups so we have put some time into trying Make sure that social distancing can be followed in those cases.
Oh, yes?
I have a question
too. James, are the signs going to cover how people should queue to wait to play and also are we going to have some guidelines so that people don't hog the courts if there's a lot of excess demand for playing the courts so people just are nice about it and take turns?
We do have guidelines in asking people to leave the court as soon as they're done playing and to not congregate. So we'll keep that in. How
about how long they
play? We didn't have a time limit, so that's something we can add to it. So we've developed these signs, and we're going to print them, laminate them, and post them in the next day or two. Just trying to avoid conflicts. Yeah.
Mayor, may I say something
please?
James. Yes. Just a couple of comments when I was in Libbey Park, I think it was Friday night, Saturday night all I saw were out-of-towners they were not social just you know there's no they were just in little groups and homeless people. I actually didn't see anybody I recognized, but there could have been some locals. The unfortunate thing about all this is the closure of the playground is impacting all the children that live in apartments that don't have a yard and they're cooped up. If there was some way to keep out-of-town people out of Ojai that would do more good and open the playground. We're in a dilemma.
I just wanted to say that. I don't know what to do about it, but I find it very sad that the kids can't go in the playground.
Thank you.
And I have one more comment if I may, unless James wants to respond.
The one response I'll say to that is we've kind of had Look for ways to try to, you know leave amenities available for residents and do it creatively. So that ties in with the North Signal Street closure which we still do get a lot of questions about but and we're planning to continue it but the idea there is encourage people to walk to shelf and discourage traffic coming from hours away to use shelves So we're trying to get creative, but yeah we don't have all the solutions on that.
Yeah I mean it's a dilemma it really is to see we're trying so hard to do the right thing and then we see groups out of towners who seem you know maybe not all but the ones I saw seemed pretty what's the word nonchalant Yeah, so and the other thing I want to say about the pickleball. I just find it unfortunate that we're resuming that with all the impact on the neighbors when we haven't tested. I thought we were going to test some kind of noise mitigation equipment and let us consider that these people are also urged to stay home And it's going to be, the noise is going to impact them even more and add to their stress. And I wish that the pickleball people out of consideration from my perspective, I wish that we could postpone that until this pandemic is over.
0:30 – 0:3823 turns
We do have the right, James, don't we? To be more restrictive in the county if we choose to.
Yes and that's one of the intents of this item is you know where we're looking at the county order and trying to think of the best ways to implement these in Ojai but I am looking for council feedback if there are concerns of opening certain services too soon
Well, that's why I'm expressing my concern that during this stressful time we're going to add to the stress of the neighbors by opening up the pickleball court. That is my opinion. And then a related question is, did the noise mitigation equipment arrive or what's happening with that?
Yeah. So we did test equipment on Friday. It was a small reduction maybe a decibel or two depending on where you stood. We don't think that the equipment that we tried is the solution which I will say We haven't determined that there is an actual noise violation, but we are trying to be responsive to lower the noise and the reduction was not substantial with this
equipment. Can I add to that Mayor?
Yes certainly Bill.
Okay well first of all James and I have talked about this and there's some iterations of how we could test that fence in a different way than it was I think we're going to have it up. If we open up the courts, we can arrange a test. And I would just say I do not agree on this matter with Susan because it's so important for People that have physical activity and that helps their immune systems. And this is a large group of people that I think we're serving in that respect, so I think we should treat them the same as we treat tennis.
Well, I disagree. I respectfully disagree. I think that the people that live there deserve more consideration and there's plenty other ways people can exercise. So that's okay. Okay. Randy?
Mayor, I'm not gonna touch the pickleball issue because there's just no reason to go there. What I am looking at though is we have a recreation staff that isn't operating at Sarasota programming or managing or monitoring programming and I was thinking what would it take to take a recreation employee and take them over to the skate park? And maybe open up, have them take a bean counter or do something.
But maybe we limit 10 kids per hour, 10 kids for something but I agree with Susan and the fact that we do have a lot of children that really they're not in school and they would like to recreate just as much as the adults in our community. And I think maybe Renee could come up with a plan that we could open Certain hours during the day to accommodate some activity. And again, treat it the same way as we would pickleball or tennis and restrict the amount of kids in interacting in there. But you know what? We gotta give these these Children something to do so that I think we have staffing debt to accommodate them
on the pickleball thing James. Uh, I don't know what hours you've got it set up for, but the idea of restricting it to singles playing only and maybe limit the hours from 10 to two or something. So people who are sitting on their, what was it? One of the neighbors said that they like have their coffee and read their paper and that thing is annoying but mostly you have your paper in your coffee before say 10 o'clock. And if the hours were somewhat limited part of this thing was sold for people like Randy and me, the elder set But, and we're not supposed to be out there anyway. So-
I agree with the mayor. I can see something like two hours in the morning nine to 11. And then you know the problem is as we head into summer no one's going to play at midday so you're gonna have a little more evening activity. So maybe you do two hours in the evening six to eight and you do you know 9 to 11 in the morning and see how that works. You could also limit your court activity. Instead of having four, you only have two. I mean, you could open the lower tennis courts and keep the upper courts closed or vice versa. There's ways of working with individuals that might be impacted as well as accommodating the adults in our community that enjoy that sport
so- And I also agree with exploring a limited trial opening at the skate park too. I think it's a good idea.
I support that as well.
The only challenge we have with the skate park is there wasn't an exemption for that, that we could find in the public health order. But we have our regular call so we can follow up and see if there's a public health concern behind that or not. With
controls?
Right
Yeah. And is there a limit on the amount of, you know, is it five or did we up it to 10? The amount of people in a confined space right now. So that's what I'm trying to say is you could start with five and work your way up with that and just accommodate how long they can stay in their things of that nature. I think it's doable. The allowance
for 10 people. I'm glad you brought that up because we actually wanted to save that. We wanted to make sure to state that the allowance for 10 people that was assessed on the 18th ended up Harmon Zuckerman, PB – He, Him, His): Not occurring. So there is there at this point the county has not said that there's you know that groups of a certain size are okay they've just identified specific activities that are okay. Yeah.
John Gerstle, PB – He, Him, His.: : When it comes to the skate park right now with things being as quiet as they are. I know down and My neck of the woods, I see skateboarders come over and they do it in the parking lot. Maybe one or two and they're not around each other but you put them all in a small area like that where control is more difficult. I think that we wait until we find out what's the next steps gonna be before we open everything up.
Well, I agree with you Johnny. I'm just saying things through the process right now but I agree with
you.
And we'll reach out to the health officer on, on the playgrounds in the skate park specifically. But that was why we hadn't opened those up. I think, I think that they intentionally left those out because of the shirt equipment and the smoke and the grouping.
Mayor, can I ask James one other question too? I made the same observations. In fact, I actually asked people where they were from when I was at Libby and I only talked to two or three people, but they definitely did not live in Ojai. The three I talked to lived in Santa Barbara. But the interesting thing was James is there any way we could talk to Captain Rivera and find out if... Is there any way that we can operate some bicycle police on bikes? And actually do a little more enforcing through the community with that activity?
0:38 – 0:5153 turns
They have been walking at least when I've been around Libbey Park, I've seen the officer.
Yeah, actually, I was at Libby the other day investigating something and ran into the officers so I know they've been walking up so but we can talk to the chief he's here but I won't put him on the
spot. This probably don't need to be on horses that video on Oxnard Beach of the sheriff's deputies is going worldwide viral.
James, I'll ride horses. We'll go down
and
keep everybody in line.
Well they were the horse John if you didn't see it what happened was two sheriff's deputies on horses came up to two 90 plus year olds sitting by themselves away from everyone else on chairs and the video shows them saying you can be here but you got to sit on the sand you can't sit on the chair and that kind of went viral. I heard about that today
I'm sure we could say something that would get us in the news too. If we want the publicity, okay James where are we here?
A couple other things one is um i think everybody this was probably a foregone conclusion but I am announcing now that there's only one concert scheduled in May at the Libya Ball and so I've talked with Sterling that's canceled it was the May 9th Big Bad Voodoo Daddy Concert That, or I should say that will be rescheduled. It's postponed. The next concert scheduled currently is July 11th so that hasn't been postponed yet but we'll continue to monitor.
City commission meetings, we're gonna start holding those in May as well with if a commission has a time sensitive item, we're gonna hold them via Zoom. So we expect to have a planning commission, a historic preservation commission and an arts commission meeting Next month. We're still going to try to limit if something's not time sensitive and it's something the public is interested, we're going to try to limit those items so the public can participate once this is over.
We also have been in contact with the 4th of July committee they are continuing to prepare for the fourth of July parade and we just talk to them and let them know you know obviously this all depends on the public health order and they are aware and they will work with us on that in the future.
James, they have publicly stated that they are say on social media that they think they're that their go ahead like they came out and said no fireworks whole thing parades going on and it was kind of a surprise to me so I just want you know that's out there i hope i hope they're right but i don't know if that i i think it's probably we should probably say it's not officially right i don't think
yeah yeah They were very optimistic when we talked to them, which right now we want people to be optimistic. So so we told him we'd stay in contact and if an order is in effect that it could impact them but we all hope it's not. So we'll see the one of the interesting things in the county's recent order as they talked about one of the next phases will be preparing for potential child care need. And so we are planning with I have a Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. We have asked our Recreation Department to start investigating options there so we will try to have either determine if it's something we can do or if it's something we can't do but we're looking into it to try to get ahead of this next phase.
What we are doing in the meantime is we're preparing virtual recreation programs that will be aired on Channel 10 Short videos with the instructors that kids and everybody are used to seeing. So we're going to try to work on that in the next couple of weeks. And then just as an ongoing thing, one more thing is the face covering requirement is in effect. The confusion that a lot of people are having right now is it's only, the only area requiring it is the city of Ojai. The county is not requiring it yet, but they encouraged it. The public health officer this morning encouraged it at the Board of Supervisors meeting.
But we get a lot of questions of you know I'm confused. I went to Oxnard and it wasn't required. The answer is the City of Ojai, the requirements in it is in effect but other cities it's not required yet.
And it's only when doing essential business transaction or business transactions.
Yes
exactly. And not walking around exercising you
know.
We want to point out that since inception Which is, I believe April 8th is when we put this in. We have flattened the most of anywhere in Ventura County.
You know one other thing along with that though yeah you know I'm out and I'm out in Auctioneer in Ventura quite a bit and again it's the same thing essential businesses actually are posting that to enter their facilities to protect their employees right asking you to wear face covers So whether the county is dictating or not, I'm telling you that it's an accepted practice that everyone's doing. And from my perspective-
It's recommended by the CDC and I continue to be perplexed why Dr. Levin doesn't want to follow CDC guidelines.
Hey, just a pile on 100 compliments on our move and zero complaints.
Right? Exactly. Absolutely Ryan.
And then lastly, we mentioned earlier we're still operating all essential city services and we're planning to continue to do that. So if you have building or planning or public works needs or any other, we're still here at City Hall and we're still available. Well I think that's really it for the coronavirus response update
Does anybody else have a question for the city manager? Because if not,
we'll move on to the next item. Okay hearing none let's go to item number three active transportation project James.
Thank you and I do have our public works director Greg Grant here but I will give a brief introduction. I'm sure everybody's aware of this project but it's been a long project so I'm going to recap it a little bit. The Active Transportation Project is The project that's intended to add bike and pedestrian safety improvements to Maricopa Highway and Ojai Avenue. This update today is in regards to the portion of the project on Maricopa Highway in front of Nordoff High School. You may recall that, uh, in recent meetings we've discussed the design of the project in front of Nordoff.
And at a prior meeting, the City Council gave the Public Works Director and I direction to work with the district, the school district, to develop a design that allows for the best traffic safety for cars, bikes and pedestrians while addressing all the concerns of the city and the school district. So what this item is on the agenda for is we met with the school district several times. We've developed the design.
The school district actually took the design to their board at their meeting last week and got feedback in general. In general, the school board liked the design, For them, and I think what will be our main concern is the cost. The design has several improvements that were not part of the original design and they've added a approximate $300,000 cost to the project. The reason this is on the agenda is the next step is if council likes the design in the school board likes the design which we've gotten the thumbs up on that The next step is this has to go to the state architect who oversees the school parking lot.
And there is a anticipated $3,500 application fee to submit it to them. Since we last spoke, the school district did talk to the state architect and determined that they can submit the application. If there's a lot of requirements, they can withdraw without penalty. So that was the main concern. And so at this time, we'll walk through the design. And if council approves that or we're not formally approving the design but if council gives us to go ahead and move forward, we would submit... We'd work with the school district to submit to the state architect. Quick question-
May I? Pardon me just a second Bill. I am an error here. I moved on to this item without going public comment. So we'll take that now. James, we had what two letters but I think that they were both for agenda items. One for the ATP which is we're now discussing and one for the lawn equipment so do we have any other general non-agenda items?
No, there are each for those it
was those two for those specific items okay so okay Bill uh we're back on the subject go
James is there a need to go to the state architect to go ahead with the demonstration project
Not to
go ahead
with the
demonstration project. And are we going to maybe learn something from the demonstration project that might modify the design?
Well, it's interesting because I'm looking over at the public works director. We've been struggling with the opposite concern which is we've talked about whether it'd be beneficial to make some of these improvements before we do the demonstration. OK. Yeah so we've kind of wrestled with trying doing it the other
way. The idea of the demonstration is to learn from
experience? So for us, you know for us the main improvement we're getting out of this exercise is uh the curb cut near the athletic field and we've talked about that and we think that's an improvement you know regardless of whether it will form the rest of the project moves forward so for us we were thinking you know some Some of those things like that we could move forward with in the
future. James, would that be the optimal improvement?
You should be asking Bill that. It's
our
preferred
design at this point.
What
I'm
trying to keep focus here guys what I'm trying to get at is...
That was a real question but if there was only one improvement that we were going to do prior to the demonstration is that the one thing I mean that was a real question and
Yeah, that's the city's priority on
this. But in terms of the state architect if we're doing a temporary demonstration I'm trying to understand why that would have to be submitted to the state
architect? So technically yes, we could do the demonstration project without submitting anything to the state architect Yeah, we could do that. I think for us probably the driving factor is the timeline for all of these things to happen is very tight so for us we're trying to keep things going while other things are happening.
Let's talk real quickly about the timeline for the demonstration. I understand that it's been circumvented only two months instead of six am I incorrect in that understanding?
No, the demonstration project is still expected to be six or it's still scheduled to be six months but it's been moved to two months later. So we were trying to rush to get the project in before school let out to see what the impact was and school is out unexpected and unplanned so we now said okay It's more important to have it run during this period when school is going to be in. So we pushed it back two months.
How does that affect all the permitting and all the other aspects of getting this project done as it is
designed?
It's going to be tight,
but we've heard that there is a potential extension of time. And I think this is true everything Because of the coronavirus, a lot of timelines are getting extended. So we believe that there's going to be time to do it and that this demonstration project is more effective when people hopefully are back in school.
0:51 – 0:5732 turns
Mayor, I have a question. So James, is Greg going to walk us through the parking lot? Because I do have questions.
Yes he will.
I'll wait then.
Okay, well before so we're going to take it have Greg walk us through this and then we're gonna talk about if we want to fund this
yeah so the two questions well there's two questions today one is whether uh i think just to move forward um the $3500 application fee it makes sense it was our request we you know we fund it and at least get that portion done The long term question we don't have to answer today, but we're providing the information we can discuss today is how we will fund the full project and whether we're going to try to work something out with the school district on that.
So James if I may, the decision today is to spend the $3500 which we've kind of already pre-committed to. I think we kind of told the school district we'd be willing to do that if they took their steps. Then it is come back Once it's submitted to the state architect, and then we see what it looks like. And then we have a decision about funding whatever that is, and it's with approval of the state architect?
Yes, yes in the reason why we need to bring this back, we need to make sure that it meets council's expectations well. So right
so we're sending $3500 off to get a plan, the plans going to come back to us, and then we'll decide whether we embrace it along with the school district to spend the $300,000 to do whatever the approved design is at that
point.
Okay, thank you.
I have a comment and I want you to listen to my comment very carefully. You know, I want you, the public and the school board to be perfectly clear on what this money is for, for the parking lot. This is so that able-bodied teenagers Are being driven to school who are being driven to school is to accommodate parents driving teenagers to school or to accommodate newly licensed teenagers. That's what that money is for and if you don't like it, then just start giving the kids We need a paradigm shift. We don't need a new parking lot, we need a shift in culture. I mean i'm not saying that we shouldn't redesign the parking lot but what's really needed is a cultural shift so that in this era of climate change the kids should be educated, the teachers and the parents should be leading by example.
The children these are teenagers with plenty of energy And with today's bikes and all the gimmicks, it could be. And once we get this demonstration project going and we make it safe, if we can get the majority of kids to ride their bikes to school or to walk to school and teachers once a week to ride their bike, if we could create this wonderful car bicycle culture then then the whole issue of overcrowding and traffic congestion in the parking lot would be resolved. But without that, we don't really have a choice but it seems like to spend the money.
I'm saying that's what the money is for, to accommodate all these cars.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by money, but so I don't want to argue about that. But I do want to bring up the fact that the Bicycle Coalition and the gentleman that speaks the most about bikes other than you in the community is Russell Sidney and the last email that all of us received from him Clearly stated, he does not agree with this plan and the way it's being developed. So how do you resolve that one?
I was going to bring that up after Greg Grant's presentation. I was gonna bring up the points and then I wanted to hear Greg's response. So yes, I'm gonna bring it up.
And then let's clarify, I don't know what money Suze is talking about.
The 35, what was it? 3500.
Let's take that at the end of the conversation and have the presentation by the Public Works Director and then we can come back to this.
Okay thank you for allowing me to speak.
You're welcome.
With that I will hand it over to the Public Works Director. We also actually have the consultant from ALTA has called into the meeting as well if there's any questions. Oh and uh and we do have the public comment on Whenever we want to address that.
Yeah, I was going to read it after
Greg.
All
right. So what's that? Give me one second. OK. This is the
map
or the
overview. Can you just look at my screen?
Oh, yeah. Well, if you start talking, I'll unmute. So if you start talking, it should
work. OK.
All right. I guess this is Greg Grant from the board of directors. I was waiting for the screen to flip. What's that?
You have mute on. Give us one second.
All right. Technical difficulties. I'm
going to get some water.
0:57 – 1:0328 turns
I think you got me mooted, James. I don't
think I
am.
Bring up the audio speaker? Yeah. Okay.
That goes pretty awesome.
All right can you hear me now?
Yes we can.
All right terrific. Well, and James can I flip to my screen or are we gonna stick with that screen? Okay. But it's still, I was hoping to go to the screen online. Yeah.
Keep your
distance. All right so go to this one, go to this one.
Go to this and hit share
screen. Oh, I see.
Can I say one more thing while you're doing that? I did listen to the entire school board meeting about this. I listened from beginning to end so I'm aware of their concerns.
OK. I think we're setting out to can everybody, I think they can all see my screen right and see that cursor as well. So again Steve Freason is here he's from Elta I think the most pertinent might be to look at the last page of this item. There's a cost estimate. And that cost estimate has four sections to it. The first section being, uh, highlighted as school parking lot striping and improvements. That's a subtotal of 126,000. So that is intended to make the adjustments.
Uh, for instance where I've got the hand moving and that new driveway cut in this area would have to modify come up here and eliminate some parking spaces here The school district's very supportive of this measure, trying to eliminate this barrier so they could come through here and they can move up through the parking lot here and around. They could also go straight or they could actually go straight through the primary means of drop off. You can see their proposing to have two drop off lanes in this area so they can actually come back from church and keep one lane dedicated to one side and one side coming in from the new drive cut. And then there's even options over here to return. So all of this when you modify this, the discussion some preliminary discussions from the school district had indicated the whole parking lot would have to get flipped and that was that discussion of going department start state architecture for the 3500 and getting an opinion on that.
And we could also at the same time request is there something And as a temporary measure during the demonstration, put in the drive cut is temporary measure and try to allow it in without maybe doing the full cost costed driveway cut. That'd be trickier. Ideally we install it in a more permanent mode, but it's possible we could do some kind of a temporary if Caltrans works with us and the department state architecture and the school district all worked with us.
So that's what that first item is all about is 126 thousands to restripe uh, and The whole parking lot and slurry the entire parking lot. So it's all clear, bold striping and provide the ADA spaces that are required, but it's not the full complete ADA ramps that may be required by DSA. They might kick in additional costs.
Mayor as he talks about each item at $126 or 126,000 do we want to make our comments to that? Or do you want us to wait till the end?
Well, James how do you think we can handle it?
I'd like to handle it on
the spot. You want to go item by item if that's the council pleasure let's do it
yeah I think item by item makes sense
okay so I just have a few questions you know regarding striping so um I just James or Greg, let's start at the top where the new tie-in is coming in. So I see that we're coming up. Yeah so we're coming up then we come all the way up to the top well you can come all the way to the topper however you do it i would prefer to come up now make a right and go down two now go down that no back one
oh go down one of these two
yeah go down that one see where the arrow is pointing down Right, my concern is I don't see any arrows. Once I see traffic coming into the parking lot, I don't see any mechanism that you have in place or that they've thought through. How do we get across the people coming in? You have an arrow right at that stop sign. See your red arrow if you go back. Now, go down a little further.
Go down towards the street. Down
towards the street? Okay.
Yeah. Right there. So look at your arrows. You've got an arrow going out and arrow going in and an arrow making a right turn. How do I get to the arrow making the right turn? Is that just for the people that are on the drop zone coming east to west? Because again, I'm lost. Do they have to put someone there permanently Direct traffic or how do you solve that corner right there?
Okay, and clarify that when you're coming from southbound on Route 33 will be coming from Miners Oaks. It'd be a mandatory right this entry to church would not be allowed during the peak traffic morning in afternoon. So you'd have to turn it right here so you'd have to come in- How did you stop that? We would sign it we'd have a sign up here that says no right turn peak hour lot like right now there's no right turns I'm sorry, there's no left turn out of this drive and no left turn out of this drive during the peak morning and afternoon. So that would be all of the traffic should be coming in here this way you could have a car still come in
that way. Right back where your hand was is that opening wide enough to allow three cars through it?
Item
number C.
1:03 – 1:1951 turns
It's a new driveway installation, it says. I'm sorry that number C, the third one down is the new driveway installation at the athletic field. The last one is the church drive approach. It has enough room but we're proposing to widen it up. Right now it's 28 feet so be three nine foot lanes which would be adequate but not ideal. So this item widens it up so you get three 11 foot lanes.
Okay and then my last question in this area as it shows three drop zones Am I correct?
Right. The drop zone out here is on Maricopa highway.
I thought the whole idea behind this, this whole reconfigurement was to remove drop zones on the highway. Am I wrong in that assumption? I think I
understood the drop zone is still popular out on Maricopa, but also to come into the school parking lot and do a drop zone inside as well. So there's two options there. And then of course, the
primary one- I mean from the school district.
Pardon me?
That was a specific request from the school district when we met with them to provide that.
So that means you're gonna have to route your bicycle lanes around the drop
zone? That was part of the original design to have the drop zone out of Maricopa to keep the bike lanes tight to the curb, existing curb and have a drop zone Right where all the other proposed parking separation lane is out throughout the
project.
Instead of a parking lane in this area between Church and Pirie, that parking lane becomes a drop off lane.
I have a question if I can. Steve, thank you for being here. Quick question for you. How much, with this proposed driveway opening that you've heard us now be arguing about a couple of times back and forth the school district? Do you see this as a big improvement? I mean is it a big deal or is it small deal? For those laymen out there like me, it feels like and looks like it's an important factor coming down Maricopa Highway from that direction but I'd much rather hear from somebody who knows more than I do about how important this might be.
It is because it gets rid of a conflict zone or reduces it there at church. So having the circulation, peeling people off from the northwest to southeast bound movement on Maricopa Highway into the parking lot earlier and ahead of church actually should improve safety for bicycles and also create better circulation within the parking lot.
Yeah that's a real important point.
The visual test as it looks you know simply put it looks like Great access point before you get to anywhere where there's congestion. You're getting cars in the parking lot at the earliest point from the direction they're coming, seems kind of essential for safety and it takes them out of the equation. Let them circle around the parking lot and get back out where it's easy and flow is consistent.
Councilman Blatts is saying right now would be that exactly, I think you put it well. As you come from the Miners Oaks side peel off all that traffic into the parking lot here and that's where the school district is looking is that was you come in from the Y side is to have a left turn lane added here and that's been that's in the cost estimate as the second section the median at Pirie Road for $90,000 that will allow lefthand turn lane here they could come And do the drop off zone. So it's exactly what you're talking about, peel off the traffic on the two ends, minimize traffic in the center and the congestion that occurs at the center.
I would say that sorry Randy, you go ahead. Sorry. No, no, no
Ryan. Go ahead. I'm sorry. You had the floor.
Oh, I was just going to say this real quick for what it's worth. I really liked the way this looks. This is what I thought we were looking at from the beginning and it feels like we labored back and forth and got back to where I thought we were gonna be. I am willing to consider if it became necessary. I don't want to go too far, but if we had to reconsider the type of bike lanes we were considering on Maricopa Highway that make up the money to get this traffic flow and make up the cost for this, I personally, if that was what was presented to us, if it was a lower class less expensive bike lane situation in order to get this done, that seems to me like an appropriate balance if that is what came
I have one more question while we're still in the same little corner.
I would like to respond to what Brian said, if I may Randy or is it on the same?
No, it's entirely different because but this way you might have something to weigh in on this. I see all this striping. I don't see a bike lane inside this parking lot so if we're channeling people through this new opening Pedestrian, bicycles and whatever. Where's the pedestrian lane? And where is the bike lane? Because all I see are parking stalls.
Yeah, and where is the bike parking? I just want to, can I segue in? Is it okay? Go ahead. So I want complete, I want assuring first of all, I want to respond to what Randy said. I mean, what Ryan said, Ryan, what you proposing defeats the whole purpose of this plan, which is to make this four lane section of the highway safe for students to ride to school. Okay, Tiffany Morris will not support this. The school board, the parents will not support this unless these are guarded, you know, the best whatever the class what is it Greg?
Class four. It's class
four. So it has to be done right because this is a key connection between the bike trail miners oaks. This is what we do here is critical impacts people coming from Five directions. So that's one thing.
Let's agree that let's agree that that's your opinion.
Yes, whatever.
I don't see the bicycle people that you do so i just disagree with your with okay well
then
my job is to advocate for the bicycle for the for the The people of all ages, for the families, for the children, for the students who want to ride their bike. So that's my job and I'm going to do it. Then secondly, I wanna make absolutely sure that all the points that Russell raised and that Randy raised just now, that the access for the bicycles and the pedestrians is safe. Now, to my way of thinking if we do manage the cars correctly that in itself does make it safer for the bicycles. Correct? If we manage the cars but I still want to make sure if you can do with I know, I have spent so much time out there with Bob Daddy. We've been out there in the heat and we've been out there at 7am for an hour and a half watching the
traffic. Stay with the
questions. I keep thinking that you can see me because I'm pointing at this map. The kids coming in from Miners Oaks Turn right at that football field, Greg. Remember that was the plan? There's a little there... Yeah, right there. And then all the kids coming from the other direction and from Cuyama and Church Road, that all those kids can have a stress-free safe experience, that they're not delayed, you know, that everything is safe for them.
So we just funneled them all together with cars coming in that big opening. So like I said, I'm lost. No one can convince me it's safe. I'm sorry.
If I can respond for a second to the
report
because I agree with you 100%. I am concerned that if we don't make sure that this works well for cars because cars are gonna keep going in and out of this parking lot whether we like it or not. If it doesn't work well for cars then we can't do the improvements for bikes. And I wanna make sure that we're doing the right improvements for the cars so that we can use the money to improve the bikes and I think, I'm so on board with you. I am probably, I don't know if I'm the only one on this council but I wanna say it. I'm probably the only one though who rode my bike onto this campus a lot of times, probably more than anybody else and when there was no parking there and I gotta tell ya, I think all these things are really neat improvements to make it safer I would rather see us be able to afford, if it comes to it, being able to do these couple of cutouts and this more optimal design than not being able to because we are spending more money on class 4 where I also believe that class 3 might work as well on those lane separations.
That would be a review that we have to take later. I'm hoping we can do both and so far it looks like we can. So, I'm totally on board with class four and getting this cut out done if we
can. Thank you. Thank you. May I add something else?
If it's a question, I'd like everyone does not just pointed to you Susan where everybody is giving in the speech and debating whether or not they like bicycles or cars best Let's just kind of keep it to the presentation, ask the questions. And then at the end we can come back and have a nice round of everybody's opinion as well.
My question to Greg is can you show myself and the public who's very interested in this, the safe access from all directions for the bicycles? I imagine that this intersection will be clearly marked You know I'm trying to visualize it. I just want that assurance that there's safe access for bicycles, pedestrians all the way to wherever the bicycle parking is which should be located you know where the kids can keep an eye on their bike probably close to the classroom I would think or somewhere in the end of the parking lot that's closest to the school. The question is
where is the safety? Greg can you answer that?
And so again, coming in from the north would be it's really there's an existing dirt path. This is where pedestrians a lot of bikes already cut across was just a rough dirt path out here. So the idea is to have Cars, bikes and the pedestrians. This is a sidewalk right here they can walk on this sidewalk. Keep in mind this isn't a crazy Costco type parking lot. This is much milder maybe people remember that in the 90s when it was peaked but nowadays you see about half of this parking lot full so you don't see it ever at full capacity but it's certainly used and there's this 10 possibly 15 minute peak that occurs in morning and afternoon That's what we're trying to accommodate. So that would be in that area now, if you're coming in from the Y side, we'll have a two way bike lane and actually we were just looking at the school brought this up and I'll flip to the next page at case.
If you're all with me here, this is now showing a shot for Valerio here This is supposed to be a two way bike lane through here. So, but there was that request. Hey, can we bring people in at some point earlier? So they cut into the parking lot instead of coming up into this conflict zone and going where cars go. So we're looking at that creating a cut across this grass area. But so from this side, they come in here bikes and pedestrians, and from this side bikes and pedestrians here And this is kind of where a lot of traffic engineering is evolving to, is try to have multiple routes in. Don't try to pack it all in one location. So the idea is you've got pedestrian crosswalks that are safer now with the flashing beacons, but when you still with four lanes, a bit risky, but safer and now when you Reduce it to one lane each direction, the safety will really move up.
And you could cross the street more safely. Parents will feel safer dropping off their kids over in these opposite sides so you can have walk-in bike in these directions fairly safely, the most safe coming in from the end. So you're gonna have quite a gamut of options this way.
That looks good. The more shortcuts for the kids walking and bicycling, the better. The sooner they can get on campus, the better. That looks great I think.
There's so many of them. And I think when we talk about bikes, every P some people think this project's all about bikes, but it really is car safety, bike safety and pedestrian. When you have four lanes, we all know that people use it as a passing lane, just like in Oakview the two highway sections in Ojai Valley are here in Oakview. So when you make this one lane now you control the speeds and you'll see a significant increase in safety out of these intersections and cars safely coming in a And then northbound B, northbound C is an option here. And so you've got all various ways to get in and really calm down the traffic that comes into this parking lot.
Thank you.
Thank you, Greg. I really appreciate it. By the way, ironically of all the things we're doing online, it's so much easier to see the map and the diagram on this situation than it is in the council meetings and even in the pictures It's really nice to have it on a computer screen.
It's wonderful, it's fabulous yeah.
We're going to have a final round of questions or
maybe I'll mention if I could get one second here would be uh I think we are stopping just to remind you that cost estimate the first section is the school parking lot that's entire It's assumes DSA requires the full parking lot remodel. So I think, I'm hearing that it sounds like an action by the council or a direction is whether to proceed with that. So that may not be the case or it may be right? That was the original question. I brought this up.
Well Greg, my suggestion real quick while we're on it is just if you're going to submit this as-is someone had better show where the bike racks are and someone better show where the pedestrians are gonna be and someone better show the access for bikes on the west side of that parking lot because right now you don't show it. So your architect should be taking some notes and maybe come back with a revision but you're not demonstrating that in this drawing
This drawing, this will not be what's submitted to DSA. Our consultant is looking for direction on it but they would use something of this realm which has parking lot detail combined. The purpose of that other drawing was late drawing here to try to show what's going on in the frontage but ideally it would have been incorporated into this parking lot so that would be a hybrid of these two go to DSA to help them understand what the proposal is.
So just to flip back to that cost estimate, yeah. First section $126,000 all in the parking lot assuming full remodeled but with DSA I think there's a little bit like going to Caltrans you might not know what else they come up with and... I have a
1:19 – 1:2422 turns
question on the cost estimate Greg since you're on that okay? I just want to explain, you know I always have a problem sometimes last summer my family's company did a seal coat slurry coat and striping together for half the size of the 164,000 you're quoting there for half the price. That was last summer. So I'm wondering where these numbers are coming from on cost.
I'm always a little concerned when I see private sector numbers being a lot higher than private sector numbers.
Can you say it again Bill? You said it was half the size... Last
summer our company I'm looking at the quote right here. Had a parking lot half that size, about 85,000 square feet and we did a single coat sealer, slurry sealer plus re-striping for 14 cents a foot.
Did you pay prevailing wage?
No. This is a prevailing wage job. I know, I'm just expressing concern and then we just bid it out.
And Bill might be handy to just flip that contractor to me. We'll just get in try to get a little more accurate estimate as well. Okay
and the other thing is I'm not a big fan of speed bumps they're usually designed to keep people from cutting through things. We don't really have a cut-through problem here. Is there? I was wondering about the case for speed bumps
Steve, do you want to address the speed?
Sure. They're there to keep the high school students from using it as a little Speedway that parking area they are adjacent to the ball field or to the soccer field is where the students currently part predominantly also going back to your comment about the cost of slurry ceiling. Keep in mind that they're pretty much giving away oil right now when we put this together, the costs for this, Futures market for oil isn't where it is today.
That was one of my points because I was-
Yeah, we live in odd times right through here.
I was quoting a price from last summer when obviously prices were a lot higher. Okay.
I have a
question. Sure, yeah. I was going to try and run through that cost estimate and if you guys want to ask questions as each item comes up or do you want to go through it first?
I just have a general question before you go to the cost, may I? May I Mayor?
Yes you may but I'm not sure that we need to debate the budget of this as much as the desirability of the design it's going to get submitted to the state because it may come back with some changes and change the cost. I agree. We'll have to decide whether or not we can afford them. I
agree. Greg what I want to ask is maybe I could meet with you You and I and Russell could meet. I don't know if you're in receipt of his letter and just go over the concerns, you and I can, and Russell could meet. Would you be willing to do that?
We can do that or else we have it, you know, the email, we've got the information. I know Russell said input before. So we're, I think between the consultant myself in school, we can all take a look at that and probably digested pretty well.
I just want to make sure. Okay. Thank you. All right,
I think the feedback we're looking for at this time is that this design is supported by council to move forward with this DSA application. And our thought is we're going to try to work with the school district to identify what level of funding they would be willing to provide for this and what funding we can provide for this. And so we're just looking for the direction to submit to DSA and to negotiate with the district on these improvements.
James, don't echo in Greg's microphone.
And I guess on that note, I'll briefly mention, I think we ran a cost estimate. The first section was a school parking lot striping. As we mentioned there's variables to that second portion was median at Pirie Road. So I think that second design is helpful And that shows, here's Valerio Road. So you can see right now this is a long median with no left-hand turns so this adds the left hand turn here it also eliminates the median through this area. The school was very interested in allowing this parking lot it's used heavily by staff And it's fully occupied in general, it seems to be a preferable parking lot for staff. So that will allow them to come from this side and turn in which is common right now they're going up they can't turn left here so they go up and increase congestion here or add to congestion do new turns come back this way.
So that was a request. So the removal of this median as well as this lefthand turn lane was estimated at $90,000.
1:24 – 1:3020 turns
That added cost for that addition that the school district asked because I didn't really understand. I wasn't sure so it's 90,000 is our added cost to do what they wanted or is that part of what they wanted and part of us just reorganizing what we already had? That's what I wasn't sure about.
That was all new work. And no specific request by the school district right not proposing the original concept design
but I will say Sorry, we're shuffling with the volumes here. But I do want to note that we walked through that with Steve, our consultant who's on the meeting as well. And we talked about whether each of these designs would improve the traffic safety for bikes, pedestrians and cars. So yes it was requested by the school district which is one point that we'll make when we're talking about costs but we did view it as an improvement
HAB-Jacques Juilland, Moderator, PB & David Ensign HAB-Danny Teodoru, Moderator, PB & David Ensign
That if part of this was just to make sure we understood clearly number a parking lot, the B was hit median C is the new driveway installation at the athletic field. That's what was originally proposed in the concept previously. And then lastly was D church street driveway approach. I think it's recognized that it's narrow there. It's, it's narrower at the driveway approach at the sidewalk and driveway approach. And then it kicks back open for the For the driveway, it's about 30 plus feet wide right in this area. But actually there's a little bottleneck here. So to improve that is at $31,000. So those are the four improvements all together.
Sure I don't want to use the O word but that's the ultimate option if we went to it right. If we got to pick and choose, that's different.
Mayor, I have one more question regarding funding. Greg, just because Ryan touched on it, I just want to be clear. Anything that's based on Maricopa Highway technically could be paid for through the grants. Am I correct? The ATP funding, it's already there. It's just a matter of do we wanna spend money there versus spending it downtown or spending this somewhere else? But the money is allocated so that 90,000 correct and maybe that's it.
This $126,000 is not covered in the ATP grant funding So why are we thinking that the total of 360, unless you know something about the funding that we don't know. How do you take $126,000 off of highways and streets and put it into parking lots? How do you- I
would recap that as yes, it's 360,000 total. That the grant would certainly cover the second item, It would cover the new driveway installation. We had talked about that and the Church Street driveway.
What new driveway?
The new driveway by the athletic field, the new driveway cut.
Okay but that's not on public, that's not the public right away. That's a private property, that school board property. Right. The
primary cost is the driveway cut. It's modifying the curve and sidewalk in the area behind the sidewalk to get it up onto that area. And we have, yeah so when you get on to the high school there is some flexibility with some of the funding that would cover some of the high school costs as well.
Through the ATP I want to be clear it's ATP money I'm talking about not city money
True, I think for simplified thing that more complicated side of the ATP funding is there's three funding sources. ATP something called CMAQ and TDA and the TDA portion has some more flexibility in it.
Randy those kind of questions can still come up at a later date right now the question is, is the council generally in agreement that this design is what we want to submit to the state architect?
And also move for purposes of trying to get things going
Okay, is there a second to them? I seconded them. Okay now continue.
I have a question of Greg. Greg, can I ask you a question? Once this design is implemented as it's implemented if issues arrive there's room for change for tweaking it correct? For example, if there's a conflict between kids that are on foot or on a bike and the cars, things like signage. And there's other ways to handle that conflict. You can do that right?
Yes.
Yeah.
And that's the reason for the demonstration grant as well.
1:30 – 1:3720 turns
All right. Well, I don't know where you're talking about doing the adaptation Sousa but if we're going to spend how many millions is this Greg? The
entire project from El Roblar to the Y to Gridley the entire project's 2.5. I don''t want it to run at just 2.0.
That we would want to know exactly what we're doing and not be caught shooting from the hip or modifying in the field so again i just greg i really Because I never get a yes or no from you, I get vague responses. So I'm gonna hold you to a yes or no to my questions. The $126 is not our money. We will not spend city money, ATP money, or any type of grant funding in that parking lot. Can you say yes or no to that?
That's a decision by the City Council.
Yeah, and I think the challenge to that is we're still trying to see what we can get the school district to cover. And then the question will be, can the remainder, can we move some grant funding around or are we going to have to come out of pocket? And that'll be part of this next in depth discussion once we get the design approved by the DSA.
All right James because it felt like you were voting on that tonight. We're not deciding tonight on whether or not to spend up to 300 grand in this parking lot, or are we deciding that? I don't think-
No, we're not. Yeah, we aren't deciding it. It's a factor in whether we want to move forward. So we're saying whether we wanna move forward. Because
Randy, I gotta be honest. Yes sir. I just wanna say this, Randy, I am totally with you. This was voted on my first council meeting when I got onto this council. I didn't see it before. I still feel a little off balance about everything that's being proposed and not totally understanding it. And aside from that, a little bit of being off balanced by the school district responses to us as well.
I just think that the downtown area is where we have so many benefits from this money. And this Maricopa Highway area is not where we nearly benefit as much from this, I definitely wanna see it take care of safety bicycles and kids going to Nordhoff. Other than that, I'd hope that we are focusing most of these resources on the downtown area. And I'm not totally convinced we're doing that, I mean, I'm studying my tail off and it's really hard to understand exactly what's going on move to move in where we are. So I do not wanna look at gift corks in the mouth and say we don't want state money.
And I definitely think you can beautify the downtown area and help all the merchants and really make it great. But in this whole section, man, I don't wanna come out against this but I'm having a hard time still maintaining my support for it because it's getting really confusing and uncertain.
I think, I think Randy feels the same. So I just because mayor we're going to be voting in a minute and you guys obviously know where I'm going to vote on this, but just so I get it off my chest, I think the most important thing that we're not really recognizing in this whole aspect, in this area of our community is we're a rural community and we pride ourselves on open space and we pride ourselves on all of these arguments over climate change and over air I don't see how this enhances any of that. We take a rural community and we urbanize it by reducing this and throwing these trees in, and throwing multiple bike lanes in. In this specific area, if you want bike lanes and I've said this all along. I'm a big probably one of the biggest fans for it.
You can put bike lanes in and you can get children to these schools safely under the conditions that are present. Spending all of this money for this and now we're gonna throw more money? I'm sorry, I will not support it just can't.
Well what I completely disagree with you about ready is that what And we're trying to move away from urban in the way that this entire corridor is designed.
Well, I think you better drive it and you better take a look at the mountain range. You better take a look at the open space and you better look at what you're doing. You're going to drive down Creek Road. You know that as much as they needed that to manage safety and speeding, you've done the same thing. You drive down Creek Road, you don't look at the environment. You look at these little yellow things down the middle of your highway just drives me crazy. Now we're gonna do it on both sides of this highway.
Okay, we got that part of the argument. Is there anyone else who would like to weigh in? I would agree with uncommon as is Bill. I would agree with you that I think a four lane Undivided or partially undivided highway that we ran what a quarter of a mile or something over there was urbanizing the thing. Whether or not it's worth the amount of money that's going to go into in the end, there is going to be a second bite at the apple when it comes back but if we don't get this At least agree that this design is what Bill, what did you call it? The optimal or the something.
Don't
do it. Come on. Come on, Bill. What did you call it? I called it the optimal model for safety and for traffic movement and both for bicycles, pedestrians and cars. We've already spent that money So for $3,500 and having a review of it if you're in the development business this is part of the due diligence. And you may have to jump the project at some point and say wait a minute, the soils test came back but yeah I'm not saying we have to have one here but I've had projects where after we did the soils tests and all of the due diligence we said well it was a nice idea but we don't see it working or we went ahead and maybe made some money on the deal so I would support this. It's too expensive.
Well, I don't disagree with that. Again my concern through this whole process is whose money are we spending? That's why i try to get yes versus ambiguity and vagueness out of our civil engineer there but one last thing I just want to understand this and I want to state it clearly restricting flow Okay, may make it to a degree safer. But I believe you're gonna have backup, you're gonna have more congestion, you're gonna have worse air quality. There's a lot of other things that aren't being studied along with this and I think that's where we're not doing our due diligence.
Well, a lot of that has been studied in the evidence does not support those conclusions right today? No, I disagree Bill.
Okay and there'll be an opportunity to make those arguments later. We don't even know if we can do this Unless we want to jump the whole idea of going to the state architect.
And then to add in Randy, I am where you are. My opinion is I'm all for it because somebody else is paying for it and it's a good idea as long as we do it exactly right. And I'm not convinced yet we're doing exactly right. That's why you have due
diligence to learn.
I agree. Hey, I agree. I'm not saying it's
1:37 – 1:4849 turns
This motion is about due diligence. That's all it is.
And I agree, and you'll see how I vote. I'm totally on board. I mean, I agree.
Okay. Susan are you still out there?
I am definitely out there. May I say one more thing?
Yeah okay say it quickly.
I am almost ready to vote for it But we have to acknowledge that this is the kind of project that I wish that we had people weighing in at the podium, people who've been studying this. There are many people in the community and there's a core group of about 12 bicycle advocates who have studied this and it's unfortunate that we can't receive their input at this moment.
Are they opposed to this design?
Not necessarily, but they may have questions that would and they may have comments such as Russell did to help clarify this.
Well there's still time to do a much of that yes
so... And the reality is for the moment this is the best it can be because as Bill would never say it's almost
optimal.
We hope it's optimal but we don't know yet okay. 10 optimal
if that's a word.
And okay, we're going to be spending $3500 so I guess we should have a roll call. So the clerk on the roll?
Roll-call vote 2–0 · 3 under review
Show transcript
Did he vote? I couldn't hear him. Okay, Council Member Haney? No. And Council Member Francina? Yes. So to confirm just because I can't hear you very well, I have a no vote from Council Member Haney, a yes vote from everyone else?
That is correct.
Okay thank you.
Thank you guys okay we are now going to the next item that It was put on by a request of Bill and Randy, I think. Yes. To talk about the gasoline engine landscape equipment that we have outlawed or are trying to decide when to start enforcing.
Yep it was effective yesterday right? Yeah.
Right now I thought the last time we talked about this like two weeks ago we decided to tell the staff use education and sell the program, don't just go around telling everybody and get through this pandemic thing. So James you have anything or should we go right directly to the topic?
The only thing I'll add is that yes it went into effect yesterday. Our focus at this point has been we've been scheduling appointments with the businesses And making sure that they have electrical equipment is the first step. If they don't have electrical equipment, then obviously we know that they would not be following this. So we've been doing inspections. We've met with several and we've been confirming that they have the electrical equipment and that is what we've actually began you know that was going to be the first couple of weeks of enforcement here.
And is it true, we had one public comment. And can I just ask a question? Mayor, is that all right?
Yes, go
Bill. So James, is it true that for that one type of specialized equipment called trimmer mowers, if there's only one manufacturer of that particular implement in
electric So the challenge, so what I could say about that is we were initially told that there were none. And so we spent a couple minutes researching it and we found one. And it's mentioned in the public comment that they spoke with us. And so we said hey you know there is a trimmer mower available. It's electric as the public comment noted. The one that we found doesn't have as much Um, range is a gas one. It has a I think it's an hour and it can be doubled to two hours of operation.
But we haven't done the research to be able to say that that's the only one that was just
my only comment is that actually wasn't anything specifically listed. It's a very specialized piece of equipment and not generally it's not widely used. I would be okay with you know kind of backing off that particular while we did some more due diligence on true availability. I don't like to be in the position of having people get only one, you know have only one supplier so that kind of caught my attention and i'd be fine with kind of backing up on that for a while while we figure out exactly what the competitive environment is
And to our knowledge, this is the only one that we are aware that is operating in Ojai. The only person who's contacted us with this. So the air quality impact of one person operating- Pretty minimal.
James? Yes. Have you checked with what's the fellow's name from the green zone? I have one of these battery operated string mowers and it Works fine. I have two batteries, one's in the charger while I run the other one and I do quarter to half acre with it so I know it's, I mean there's the availability is there that I think the question isn't how soon we would you know help advance the technology is.
Yeah and that's a good resource. We are still in contact with Dan from The Green Zone so we'll reach out to him and see if he's aware of multiple options for these.
So why don't we go slow on this and carry it to the next meeting when you have a chance to see whether or not there is a competitive product.
Yes.
Susan, did you have something?
Yes. Did you investigate those because they're a great alternative for weed abatement and you can rent them by the hour for the task. And so I think we should include that. I know there's people doing that. So that's it. I'm afraid if we start making exemptions, right now there's only one but that could lead to more stay away from that.
Okay, we'll investigate the availability and the run time and how many options there are of those electric.
And include goats I'm serious about that.
Well yeah and i suspect goats would be more expensive you have to ship them over and then you have
to maybe some goats in the neighborhood even
well you have you have goats for different types of applications too so um yeah unless you can train a goat to only chew the grass at an inch and a half I'd be happy to
I had a question for Mr. Summers,
Mayor. What's that? I think I had the floor but okay.
You took the floor. Bill has the floor and then we'll come back to you Randy.
Matthew what's the situation in terms of enforcement for property owners that just um you know they'll hire one person They'll get cited. We've seen this with the blowers already, then they just hire somebody else that doesn't know about what the law is. In other words, they just keep rotating who they're hiring including people that are pretty far away to come in and just as a means of not having to make a good faith effort. Do you feel... Is there any role in looking at the culpability of the property owner hiring commercial users? In a way that is seeking to evade enforcement.
Yeah, we can take a look at that. We can certainly cite the property owner if we can prove that. I recognize proving that may be a bit difficult but if you had two or three cases where a property owner hired, cluelessly hired outside people after the first time they're on notice that they have to direct anyone higher who is providing any kind of landscaping services, they have to use electric powered equipment. The second and third time they've had somebody on their property who's not using electric equipment, the argument that they didn't know disappears So with the right facts in place, we can't enforce against that. We can also use the allowance under section 51503 of the ordinance for the city manager to create regulations, to implement it, to create a process requiring property owners to be aware of the issue by notice and then enforce it against them to the extent that they're aware.
So there are tools there, not just the operators.
Thank you. If I could add one thing real quick, just that gives us the opportunity to mention We are continuing the electric leaf blower enforcement, which has been in place for quite a while. And we did cite someone last week who ironically, as you mentioned it, they said that their gardener was coming up from LA and that they weren't aware of the restrictions. So we encourage them to start telling other people in LA not to come to Ojai with gas powered equipment.
Hey, for what it's worth James I talked to Lackey again at APCD about a sticker that could be countywide. I talked to some people on the county and our local environmental committee who supported it as well and maybe it's something we end up doing. And I'm still as silly as I kind of think it is hoping we get an Ojai-centric electric sticker and all that equipment throughout the county or
something. Randy you had something you wanted to
say?
Thank you Mayor. So, I've looked into this equipment. There's got to be between 10 and 13 varieties. I've priced them all. I've met with Dan. Dan actually held a demonstration at Sarasota Park about two months ago. These gardeners in this community know exactly what's out there. They know exactly what the cost of this is And I just think that when it comes to commercial operations, James, you need to be enforcing this. And then if we wanna give anyone a break and the people that are asking for it are residential users. And again in hindsight, I have no idea why we went after residential users when we can't even enforce commercial so My two cents is let's figure out how to get these people that are providing services in this community, gardening services.
Get them licensed, get their equipment inspected and get them tagged. I can't believe that'd be that difficult to do.
And I'll note as to that point the request for the trimmer mower was a residential user so i just wanted to point that out that wasn't a commercial user right
1:48 – 2:0446 turns
And I want to note, I did not call the city about a residential use this week on electric or non-electric power. I have been...
You've taken the lead though. I called
about you Casitas but I'm not calling about my neighbors.
Okay so what is the ask? What are we here to do on this? Good question.
Well, I think we're gonna go easy on the tumor mower while we get more information. I wanted to ask about property owner enforcement that was... And as far as residential, you know, we're talking about a health condition that is aggravated by air pollution and I just feel like residential homeowners should be making Adjustment, you know we're going to go easy on them. You know reasonably we're going to inform. We're going to focus on education but I've gone out and spent some money with a hedge clipper and a mower and frankly the more I think what we learned is that these small gasoline engines are in fact they're obsolete. They're buggy whip technology.
They're overly polluting And they're a lot more trouble to operate. Your productivity increases using electric, so I even went out and bought an electric tiller works great.
Yeah okay. Let me ask
this Johnny James is uh i mean should we wait till the end of the emergency declaration to enforce this? Should we start now are you asking us that question? Is that what we're answering today or I'm not totally clear on that,
so. Bill and Randy asked to have it on the agenda- And
I agree. Well, and I will say I said too because it was in the newspaper that we're gonna start enforcing it yesterday but I know I talked to a couple people who weren't necessarily on board with it than a couple others who were like hey how are we supposed to try and figure out how to get this taken care of right now? And of course that was maybe a couple weeks ago arguably they've had time now But it's also not easy to, I mean, I went to the Home Depot on Sunday. There was a 200 person line outside. I mean-
Mail order works great.
Yeah that and you know what Bill? That might have worked. I mean unfortunately that was where I was. I don't disagree. I just feel that at least a small delay given the certain, I mean everything's been delayed. It doesn't make
sense that we would enforce this. Yeah this is my problem so the enforcement if it goes We take a pause until the pandemic thing gets somewhat under control and we start to reopen businesses, then we should sit down and talk about this again without using a hammer on people.
I don't think we should use a hammer but we should also recognize that air pollution by Peer reviewed studies does aggravate your susceptibility to respiratory illness.
Well, can I offer this maybe if we want to look as a middle ground? Maybe we say until the pandemic in the emergency is declared over, we hand out warnings but we're still enforcing it and warning people and then we decide to enforce with whatever is a fine or more robust punishment afterwards. We wait to do that until the pandemic emergencies lifted
except relief lower
So, well yeah and I agree that was done. That should have been a long time ago. Bill you know how I feel about that especially our outside agency.
So I could live with that even though I don't necessarily agree with it? Yeah I don' t know. That's the only thing I can think of in the middle of it. But not leaf blowers.
No Mayor what I'm hearing and I am in agreement but aside from your code enforcement comes up upon a commercial maintenance operator I'm not inclined to give them a warning when they've had more than enough time to figure this out. So, I'd be more inclined to make sure that they're required within a two week period to get that license so we at least know who's operating in our community and then look at registering their equipment.
And I would focus on what Ryan suggests just for residential.
Okay well, I think that the city manager now gets the gist of this The law is the law, it's in place. Education and persuasion is a good approach but those where mild therapy is not working he needs to up the amperage a little and I agree with Randy. I don't think that this makes a very good argument for people in the commercial business who do this every day eight hours a day as opposed to a homeowner But the homeowners need to get on board too because you know, you can have the whole everything including a lawnmower even though we don't want to encourage lawns throughout the threatened area. But for less than $1,000, you can have almost all those tools and several batteries in the charger so it's not an unreasonable burden. Yeah.
Mayor I don't know if you can see that I've been raising my hand.
I couldn't but now that you told me go ahead.
Okay, what I want to say is I want to have the same standard for residential and commercial. And I'll tell you why if the residential people don't have the proper tools they can either do it by hand or let their garden be a little bit wild. There is no reason to continue to pollute.
Okay so we talked that one to death? I think we're okay then James The law is still the law, good judgment. And during the pandemic let's not pick on people who are supposed to be staying safe at home. So do we tell James,
James do what's right just don't be arbitrary and capricious? Is that
what we told you? I
think that's it. I'm on board, I get it too. That's exactly what I did with my neighbors the other day. It was like, I don't really know what to do.
It's so crazy. We have garden for hundreds of years without gas powered tools. There is no need for all this. Yeah,
okay. Let's go to Council reports. Randy you want to kick off on reports? I'm done. You're done? Okay. Ryan?
I did have an APCD meeting today. Things are still moving along, I will say we're replacing a lot of equipment and I have asked and I'm hoping to really get this data. I don't think it'll be super impactful for Ventura County in Ojai But I have asked Lockheed a number of times and said, look this is the only experiment we're ever going to have where there's no cars on the road. See what gear looks like? I really want us to use that data to be you know hey here's what we can shoot for in a hypothetical.
The one other thing and this may be a future council item but i don't know Everyone I'm talking to, I keep hearing this idea. Besides what I said last week that I think Ojai is going to be a targeted area for people with all this pent up demand to go out of town. It's going to be a very hot place for people to go I think and I'm hearing from hotel people and recreation people there's a lot of reservations coming in in that June time frame, June 1st on Because there's a lot of people all over that want to go. But in the longer term, I hear everybody talking about how this may reorient so many businesses especially in California and especially in Southern California from a traffic commute business to a stay at home business.
My girlfriend, I'm literally living in her office right now. My house feels like it a little bit and their business is more productive than ever. And at the beginning of this year they were offering stay-at-home days instead of vacation days like these half kind of days. Now they're talking about giving you a couple months of it during the year. I just think it's a reminder for this community especially coming out of this especially in the diversification of economy Broadband is going to be such an important issue for this community to secure. I think those same reasons why we may be a really great place to come visit coming out of this, is another good reason why people or businesses are gonna look and say this might be a great place hour-and-a-half from Metro, hour-and-a half from the airport far enough away where you don't all of those things I just think there is not going to be any more important time than coming out of the coronavirus epidemic for us to make sure we invest in broadband.
So, I want to remind everybody that.
Okay thank you uh Susa do you have any report?
Yeah i just want to express my appreciation to the California Association of Governments and the people that put on the Go Ojai demonstration project virtually the workshop and I want the public to know that this is still online if they have, is that correct James? And they can watch it. And I think the questions that were asked, the concerns that were raised about the reduction of the four lanes to two lanes, the consultants did in my opinion, did a great job answering those concerns and I think if the public watches it, they'll understand the project better. And so, um, and I want to, I am assuming that the whole council did watch it right? If you haven't watched it, I hope, I hope that you will.
Bill and I are still working on the animal ordinance, but we believe that, correct me if I'm wrong, that it shouldn't be brought back until the meeting is open to the public. But I've actually been collecting quite a bit of information on the Animal Kingdom page. People are weighing in, they're becoming more aware of it. And all the other things, we're finally working on things, the loose ends from a few months ago.
Okay, thank you Susan. Bill do you have anything?
Yeah, I just want to alert the public. Susan and I have been going back and forth on this. We've been hearing getting information we're collecting more information. You know there's a pattern here with the Trump administration they're trying to do more extraction activity in the National Forest at the same time that they're gonna reduce the ability to enforce you know the rules so they're talking about cutting us off in terms of not having a ranger station here where the primary traffic entry into this part of the national forest. At the same time, there's discussion at the highest levels about uranium mining again, not to mention what was earlier done about opening up mineral rights and everything. So we're seeing a pattern of things coming from the federal government in terms of ultimately threatening our watershed and our quality of life And I think, I just want the public to know we're watching this very carefully and looking to try to engage in alliances with the city of Ojai with other watchdog groups because the pattern has become quite clear.
Let's cut back on regulations and oversight while we step up extraction activities that have a lot of risk of environmental damage. So it's something we need to watch very carefully
Especially while we are distracted by other things. And the federal government is trying to ask some things, but we are looking this way and not understand 100%. Thank you.
I just want to make sure
we're not
distracted.
Okay. I have just one item kind of a shout out to some citizen volunteers that there were some concerns expressed about the high school graduation being disrupted And so some well-meaning and hardworking citizens got together with the school board and got their concurrence, and then met with our staff. And what they are going to attempt to get done is to get a graduation roll done on little banners and hang them downtown in the arcade. And the festivals who had that particular time slot reserved, you know, they're not having their concert and they have relinquished their rights To hanging the banner. And so that's a nice grassroots citizen operation and I wanted to say thank you, Nigel Chisholm is from the vine has been one of the prime movers done that city managers report
Thank you have a couple things I'm gonna try to make it quick. Wanted to show this real quick there's two things one is on the right, amidst all the challenges we wanted to take the chance to mention some good news the city received an $864,000 grant to remove invasive plants and restore the natural environment in Middle Stewart Canyon Creek, and that also will help with fire risk mitigation. So we're excited about that and we wanted to give a shout out to the crew, the Ojai Valley Land Conservancy and PACS which includes a member of our climate committee Brian Hawley. Also helps with aquifer recharge.
Yes yes that's the plan so I'm
going to interrupt you. Brian Hawley, Brandon Titus get a huge shout out over at PAX for landing this. I am so excited that my guy who I put on the climate committee who is a long friend of mine one of my just a fantastic guy he called me right before this went public and i've never heard so much excitement in his voice that he said on the second try they got this this is really cool and and Bill especially to you uh you know we We've been talking, this is money for the same place you all have been looking at for a while. I am so excited about it. So really great news. Sorry but go ahead James.
It's funny
because-
James one quick question who's going to manage the grant? So Greg Grant and myself will be responsible for managing it. Well let's leverage
some volunteer help. A lot of people would like to leverage this money with time support Yeah,
that's such a good point. And I've already heard from three people who said hey, there's money back there what can we do to
2:04 – 2:0823 turns
help? Thank you. With people who maybe aren't aware, but it's quote unquote coyote season. So please be aware and look for the signage out on the trail and then just a couple.
Oh yes we put a sign up there in conjunction that says let's give the trail back. Maybe nature wants that trail back. Nature is taking it back.
I do keep hearing that you know I think we had we had a bunch of lizards here last week so apparently nature is taking over The other thing we wanted to mention is our we at budget committee, we agreed to solicit new or to recommend the council that we will solicit new auditors. So we have started that process and uh we've had our current auditors for several years way longer than is recommended so that will be coming to council for a contract recommendation at a future meeting. And then last, it is weed abatement season. We all say there's no more fire season anymore or what I should say is year-round in Ojai is fire season so we used to say this would be the start of that season but it's year round so We are starting our weed abatement program.
Our code enforcement officer is doing inspections now, and we will send letters out between now and May 31st. So if you get one, please remember we're just trying to mitigate the fire risk. And if everybody does their part, it will make Ojai safer. That's all I have.
OK. Do we have any requests for future agenda items?
I do. James, do you need council support to write those two letters? The one for to express our concern about the increased uranium mining on the Lake Casitas watershed and of course the reduction of services.
The Forest Ranger one we've identified that it falls under our legislative program for local control of our resources I'm not up to speed on the uranium one. I don't know if the city attorney is aware of our legislative program, I don't know if he had a chance to review that and can say whether that falls under that or if we need support?
I think it would fall under it. We had a couple of points about protecting the integrity of our local environment and I think it would also be consistent with the existing legislative program. Okay
you got two new links right yes
yes so So if they're both in the program, we could send those. We don't need to have any motion or anything like
that. Okay, well-
Donnie I do have one. I got contacted this week by a number of commercial tenants who said, hey, I'm confused and misunderstanding where the city is what the rules are why? If any, I believe at the end of our discussion at the last meeting we talked about potentially revisiting that issue down the road. I would again like to revisit it if anybody else wants.
Which rule?
We have not extended the same commercial eviction or moratorium as other cities have at this point. I
would
second that Ryan.
Yeah, because there's already business closing. I don't know if they're closing because they can't pay their rent but they're closing so I yeah we'll
revisit
that.
So the council wants to revisit that next at the next meeting? Is that
good? I would like to hear it. Ryan's request I seconded so
okay.
We'll bring that back next meeting.
Very good okay if that's it We are now adjourned. Thank you all.