BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 July 14, 2020

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:1133 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role0:01

Okay, I'll call the meeting of the Ojai City Council to order. Will the clerk please call the roll?

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 2
Show transcript
Mayor Johnston? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Blatz? Here. Council Member Francina? Here Council Member Haney? He is here
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:19

we are pulling him into the webinar.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:21

Okay and Council Member Weyrich?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:24

Here

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role0:25

okay we have a quorum Pledge of allegiance. Well, the city manager being the one who can maybe stand up down there with a flag and lead us in the pledge?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:36

Sure. OK. Hand over your heart. Ready begin.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role0:55

Thank you James.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role0:59

Okay, approval of the agenda. Are there any changes in the agenda? Hearing none, the agenda stands approved. There are no presentations. Public communication will be at 730 and I have two cards, one from-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:19

Mayor Johnston can we hold for one second? We're having an issue getting Randy into the meeting, Councilman Rahaney.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:29

If he came in on the post, he would have been there. All right so how do we fix that? Does it say you're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:44

waiting on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52

us? Webinar registration approved. Okay, then he needs

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:59

to... Yep.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:17

There you are. So your name is Randy F. on this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:35

So apologies, we are trying to get Council Member Haney in. We can probably put him on my... Oh, is he in? Okay. We got him in. Okay. We can proceed. Apologies.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:50

Okay. Randy did you clear security?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:53

Looks like he's muted, so James will unmute.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:56

He's not quite clear yet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:58

Yeah, he'll unmute him right here in 10 seconds.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:01

OK. We don't want to deny him his First Amendment rights.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:09

All right. Are we in? Yep, we can hear you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:12

Yay! I see no picture though. Is that intentional? I'm having a bad hair

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:20

day, Mayor.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:22

OK, well. Your secret's safe, okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:25

I have no idea why my picture is not up. James am i doing something

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:29

wrong? Push the video

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:30

camera

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:33

down at the bottom of the screen you should see a video camera

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:39

oh there we are okay

CommentChris BartonProposedself-stated3:44

um

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:54

There you are. And you're right, you do have a bad day.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59

Now I'm trying to how do I enlarge it James?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:05

Looks good here. Is it showing up small

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:08

on your screen? You're fine Randy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:10

Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:11

Yeah what is that? We're fine. Yeah, what it is there we go. I couldn't see any of you okay now i feel better. Okay Luzza you're having a very good hair day.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:28

Well thank you

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role4:31

very

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:31

much. I got my haircut.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role4:34

Okay we've done the pledge Randy did you have any requests on the agenda before we approve it? We didn't hear any other objections or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:44

are we on the agenda no but on the consent I'll have one

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role4:48

Okay we'll pull it when we get to that. Okay presentations none,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role4:51

public comments at 7 30 so we are now on consented calendar and Randy you want to what? I just wanted to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:58

poll Jay the reappointment of incumbents to the commissions

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role5:05

okay do we have a motion on the balance of the consent calendar?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:11

I'll move to

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role5:11

approve. Was there a second? Second All right, second. Okay moved and seconded uh any well I guess without objection so approved okay Randy you're on with Jay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:29

yeah you know Mayor the only um the only issue that i have in it and it's um I want to make it clear it's not personal because I don't know the gentleman but that's one of the problems that I have with Suze's nominee reading his application I didn't have a sense that this gentleman has any idea of what the planning commission does. And I don't know if he's attended meetings, I don't know if he understands Title 10. I just have a lot of concerns that we're just putting someone on a planning commission because we needed an applicant. So because of that, I can't support this applicant, I just wanted to say that.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role6:13

Okay, well, I don' know Mr. Trent personally but He was engaged in community meetings regarding the lot on Montgomery that the council inherited from the state for affordable housing unit. And so I think he is somewhat familiar with what the planning commission, the city does but other than that, I don't know.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction6:37

So- Bill? I was thinking since Susan nominated this gentleman we might wanna hear from Susan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:44

Yeah, I'm waiting to speak. I nominated him because I felt that he, first of all, he grew up in Ojai and he graduated from Nordoff. He's a little younger than the rest of the planning commission. You know, he has two children ages 15 and 11. He expressed an interest in planning and projects that are compatible for Ojai. He is eager to learn. I'm definitely willing, I'm the liaison to the planning commission. He's extremely enthusiastic about learning the ropes and jumping in tomorrow evening if we Approve his nomination.

I was also interested in, you can go to his... Assume that you've read his qualifications. One of the biggest complaints in Ojai is speeding traffic. He has a good background in traffic calming. He was very successful in his neighborhood in Ventura His mother-in-law is Colleen McDougal. I really like that he had deep Ojai roots and he is very, very concerned about the future of Ojai. I think that's as important as the technical aspect. He doesn't have a conflict of interest or anything of that nature.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role8:20

And the Planning Commission isn't supposed to be a panel of professional experts. We have a staff for that, so I think that any citizen that has a reasonably good understanding of the community as a citizen makes a good candidate. So I would support it. Are there other comments? If not, do I have a motion to approve the two nominations?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction8:47

I will move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed8:49

I'll second. That will be both, both nominations.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role8:53

Right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed8:55

okay

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role8:57

any further discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed8:59

I just would have hoped that if Randy had concerns that he would have taken time to meet with John Trent.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role9:05

Well no let's don't get into that Susan we're not evaluating each other everybody has the opinion i think you've done a nice job.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed9:15

Okay

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role9:16

Okay, so city attorney we don't do we need a roll call on this or is this a by acclimation Oh, a voice vote is sufficient for this one. Okay, all those in favor aye. Aye. Those opposed. Okay, we have one day. The motion carries. Okay, we are now on discussion item and we put this number one because we have about 24 members of the community who wish to address the council regarding the policing services And I assume the Black Lives Matter issue and other related topics of which Ryan had asked us to, well, I think you were, was it Bill? You and Ryan were the ones that requested this to get the input from the community. So unless there are questions for the council, I think we can proceed. We have 24 on the list if we stay with our three minute It looks like we can handle that.

I was going to cut it back a little bit unless the council wants it reduced to a lesser time, we'll go with the three minutes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed10:36

Okay. Can I make a suggestion? Because there's no way we can finish this right at 730. I don't know how many people are waiting to make a public comment but could we do that

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role10:49

Now,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed10:50

just a thought so that we

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role10:51

can okay. Is there any problem with that Matt? If we just go ahead and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed10:57

legally no because the stated time on the agenda is a target time not a requirement. So we can take public comment early.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role11:05

Okay did we get written remarks from Ron and from Michael Shapiro or are they going to call in?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:13

They're going to call in And looking at James to see if they are currently on

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction11:18

hold. They weren't expecting until 730.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:24

OK, they are they are on the line so we can take them now.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role11:26

Great. OK. We'll take those two first and then that has occurred to see. OK? I guess it's Ron's up first.

0:11 – 0:169 turns

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated11:49

Hello

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role11:49

there.

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated11:53

Thank you all, wasn't sure how that was going to work. Good evening members of council my name is Ron Solorzano and I am the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley. I just wanted to take this opportunity to provide you all with an update on the current status of the Ojai Library following our recent period of closure Since our partial reopening in the beginning of June, the Ojai Library has been offering walk-up service for the pickup of items on hold.

With this new service model customers can place holds on books, audiobooks and movies online through our catalog and can also call the library during our open hours for assistance. Current hours of operation are Monday through Friday 1 p.m to 6 p. m and Saturday 10 a.m to 3 p. Those visiting the library to pick up holds must wear a face covering in accordance with local public health guidelines and are asked to observe social distancing when interacting with library staff.

We're also excited to report that customers of all ages are able to participate in our summer reading challenges this year by visiting our website. You can enter yourself or your kids to keep up with your reading over the summer and to get a chance to win several fun prizes. The Ventura County Library is also offering grab and go STEAM activity kits at our branch locations, which include the Ohio library.

Finally, we have a wide variety of online services available including virtual story times and sing-alongs on our YouTube channel. Live homework assistance through our eLibrary and an expanded selection of eBooks and other digital content. So please visit our website at www.vencolibrary.org to learn more about what your library has to offer in these interesting times.

And that's all I've got.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role13:47

Thank you so

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated13:48

much.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role13:51

Okay and next up is Michael Shapiro.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed13:59

Hello there, do you have me? Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed14:03

Good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed14:07

evening, everybody. Thank you for this opportunity and this unique process here. I just want to say on two items that you're going to be discussing tonight my first comment about the Maricopa Highway beautification plan You know, April 21st of course. April 24th 2019 Edith Rubaloff of course was killed trying to cross an intersection in Herb Walker. September 24th 2019 one of my dear friends Norman Remm was driving his Mini Cooper when a car sped out of one of the exits at Nordhof Sideswiped him. The car was completely totaled and flipped over.

Police came, were about to use the jaws of life to get him out when they were able to open up the hatchback in the rear to get him out. His car was totaled. He sustained a lot of injuries that required a year of rehab. And of course we all remember Dr. Fred LeFar's 14-year old son was killed and struck and killed there as well. If the Maricopa Highway beautification plan was in place or had been in place way back then before any of these, I absolutely believe the mode of the way people traveled on that road would have been such that all of those would have been prevented. I don't know how many more there are, but there were others that we know about. It's certainly close calls so there's no doubt and I have an op-ed that's about to appear in the Ojai Valley News that expresses some of the other reasons why I think the beautification plan and the traffic calming is a win-win for everyone not least of which is also you know I've had a lot of personal lengthy experience with our county's planning division, and they're somehow in love of approving huge industrial truck traffic coming down Highway 33 from industrial projects up in the Los Padres Forest.

And the most recent one is coming soon is a uranium mine that was defeated years ago at White Rock, Piedra Blanca. It's back on the drawing boards. I don't know if we'll ever see the light of day in time But it is being seriously considered. I believe this plan would make it almost impossible to be approved, trucks of any kind through that road. And finally with regard to the police contract you will be discussing later, I would like to see written into the contract the absolute ban on police chokeholds and a ban on any racial profiling of minorities anywhere in the Ojai Valley. And those are my comments on those two items that I know you'll be discussing later this evening. And I thank you for the opportunity to speak with you.

Okay, thank you Michael. You bet.

0:16 – 0:2327 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role16:49

Okay, those are the only public comments we have. So now we are going to go to discussion item number two which is Ventura County Sheriff's Office review of services contract policies and procedures and by way of background that the council did a point subcommittee of Ryan and Bill to work with the city manager Review the performance of the sheriff, the results and outcomes of last year's crime statistics as well as the contract itself. So we'll go around the table. Does the council have any question of staff or anything? Or should we jump right in and let the public tell us what they think?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction17:33

I just prefer jumping in hearing from the public personally

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role17:36

Okay, I would agree. If there's no objection to that then let's get started with number one is Emma Bailey.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:48

Go ahead.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role17:51

Emma you're on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:55

Emma can you hear

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed18:00

us? I need an interpreter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:06

OK, we'll try coming back to Emma. We'll go to Ryan first and then we'll try Emma again next. Ryan Bigler.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:17

He hasn't signed in yet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:21

OK, who's next on the list that signed in?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:23

Aaron Snyder.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:26

OK.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role18:29

Aaron, you're up.

CommentAaron Snyder I'mProposedself-stated18:32

I'm here. Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed18:33

Yes, we can hear you.

CommentAaron Snyder I'mProposedself-stated18:35

Okay hi my name is Aaron Snyder I'm a longtime resident of Ojai lived here for 15 years one of the reasons that i love living here so much is the atmosphere here this sense of community it's one of the safest places in America by just about any measure we've got a quiet population minimal crime and yet we're spending really a really large portion of our budget on policing with an organization and the Ventura County Sheriff's Office that really couldn't care less what our community wants or needs. The police forces are supposed to protect and serve their communities, to work with their communities to find the best and healthiest ways to keep everybody safe healthy and happy together.

The VCSO does not work with the people of Ojai. It's appalling to me that they won't even negotiate their contract I understand that they haven't meaningfully engaged in updating our contract with them in 40 years. You all, as our elected officials, you have no say over our community's law enforcement practices. The Sheriff's Office refusing to allow independent oversight in the form of subpoena power?

That isn't acceptable. This is our city. We should have the rights and determine how it's policed. We should band together with other communities like Camarillo and others in the region with similar concerns to ours, and we should force the VCSO to negotiate if they won't do so on their own. We ought to have transparency to be able to accurately assess the real value of the services provided by the VCSO, and we shouldn't settle for what appears to be a take it or leave it kind of an offer without exploring our alternative options really deeply and thoroughly.

I want to see Ojai spend much, much less than $3.5 million on policing. I believe we should expand the definition of peace officers to include mental health and medical professionals, social workers and victims advocates, and incorporate that into our budget for peace officers. By doing so, we could stop asking the police to do all these things that they aren't trained to do. We could get people the help they actually need, and we could do our part to curb the national trend of using guns to solve problems that require words and empathy.

I really believe that Ojai deserves a say in its own law enforcement, and I call on the City Council to ensure that we gain self-determination in the very near future. Thank you very much.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role20:35

Thank you Aaron. James, I'll let you decide who's next in the queue because my list of whoever is called is not matching up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed20:46

It's not matching up quite. We'll try Emma Bailey.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role20:58

Are

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:58

you out there? She's not showing on the list.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:01

Okay, can you go to the next person on the list?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:03

The next one who is showing on the list is Carolyn McDonald. Okay. One moment. Promote to panelist?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed21:47

Hello. Hello, can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role21:50

Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed21:52

Yes, this is Caroline.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role21:53

Yeah okay you're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed21:54

on. Okay thank you. So when we're talking about where money should be allocated for the health and safety of all of our citizens living here I think we need to look at options that aren't the police officers because according to several sources including racecounts.org Ventura County is the most racially disparate in terms of crime and justice in California And there are ways we can reform our police force, but I think investing in other ways of helping our community is ultimately going to be the best solution.

Particularly pertaining the homeless community here in Ojai and in California. There are a lot of ways we can invest in resources to help people without homes because that is a lot of what our police officers deal with and they're not trained resources that don't exist. You know, how can you help homeless people if you're trying to give them resources that don't exist?

So if we were to spend some of the 3.5 million dollars allocated to the VC Sheriff's Department on focusing on helping people in our own community by creating things like a homeless shelter, a crisis center I'm focusing on social workers who have been trained in helping people with mental health crises. The police officers would not have to be as involved in our community because the issues they would be dealing with, would be helped by other people who are more trained to deal with those issues.

I understand there are some cases where we need the aid of police officers. But similar to Aaron, I think that those individuals helping us should be members of our community and take a serious interest in our community. So I greatly understand and respect the need for law enforcement but there are ways we can invest in it that are at less of a cost to our citizens and our community.

0:23 – 0:3023 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role23:58

Okay, is that it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed24:01

Oh yes, that's it. Thank you so

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role24:02

much. Okay well thank you for being very succinct. Who's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:09

next? The next person I have showing present is Lynn Francis

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role24:14

Jay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed24:18

Is the audience at home also looking at this giant timer on the screen?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:25

Yes, that is what the audience is seeing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed24:28

OK, there's no way to get rid of that? At least not tonight. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:33

don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed24:37

want to hold up the meeting. I'm just asking if there is a simple solution.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:40

Not really a simple one, no. So we're, I guess we're asking everybody to bear with us first attempt to try to get the public participation here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed24:52

Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role24:54

Is Lynn out there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed24:56

I'm here. Can you hear me? Yeah,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role24:58

we can.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed24:59

Hi. I come to you as a homeowner in Ojai for the last 36 years. Our home is in Taramina and over that time period, I imagine that I personally have through my property taxes are probably paid for several officers salaries. I'd like to see my tax dollars go to more pressing needs Needs such as victims advocacy, social workers and other mental health assistance for our homeless or services and activities for our young adults who really have nothing to do in town except for kind of hang out.

And then there's always the big issue on the table which is our deficit. So the idea of the ability to reduce our deficit by reducing the amount of money that we're spending on for this sheriff would be another wonderful benefit here I think we need accountability for and a say in the most costly line item on the city's budget. To spend $3.5 million on a service for which we have no say seems an inappropriate use of our funds.

The other thing I want to talk about is just the quality of the policing that we receive here. Excuse me, I'm sorry my phone decided to ring. It seems to me and it's always seemed to me that Ojai is the training ground for the Sheriff's Department's new officers. We have this rotating door of young officers which results in over-policing and overzealous policing And it causes problems for our young people who can't even live in their town without being harassed by police.

So I just would like to ask us to, I'd like to ask the city council to take this opportunity to ensure that the Ventura County sheriffs are accountable to the city which is their customer. Unusual to have such a large service for which the customer really doesn't get to choose what they want. So I think there was a lot of value in Ojai working with the other cities that are using the Ventura County Sheriff's Department services in order to come and force them to come to the table and negotiate a contract that would be affordable for our city, and that would really give us the services we need. So, I'm asking the City Council to please Take this as a serious request from members of the community to insist that the Sheriff's Department come to the table and renegotiate.

Thank you. Okay,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role27:51

who is next up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed27:53

The next person I am showing present is Eric Fruth.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role27:59

Where is Eric? Oh okay. Eric are you there? I am. Can you hear me? We can.

CommentEric PruthProposedself-stated28:07

Excellent. Um, well good evening honorable city council members. Um, my name is Eric Pruth. I'm a lifelong resident of Ventura County over the past couple weeks. I've spent upwards of 30 to 40 plus hours compiling data across the past three fiscal years for all the cities in Ventura County. In doing that, I saw that every single city allocates over a third of their discretionary funds on police departments In Ojai, we allocated $3.3 million to the police last fiscal year. 3.3 million dollars is a very powerful amount of money.

That amount of money could erase the student loan burden of over 100 people. It could pay for five educators salaries for half a decade. It could triple the amount of money... Sorry, it can triple the annual amount of housing vouchers issued in Ojai to families in need of support and the city of Ojai wields that amount of money on an annual basis I understand that the Sheriff's Contract Review Committee has been tasked with looking at the 43-year-old VCSO contract, and I very much commend that action.

I'd like to highlight the specific importance of two things and then share what I think needs to be done moving forward. First, the Sheriff Ojai's discretionary spending allocated towards the police is way too large. It's an entire third of the general fund. Second, the rates at which services are provided are very high For example, a halftime captain position cost the city over $200,000. Those service provision rates have been extremely difficult to for both public and other City Councils to find out and are not directly expressed in the Ojai annual budget documents or in the budget documents of other VCSO contracting cities.

The fact that those service provision rates are not transparent and included in budget documents Seems to me like deliberate obfuscation to hide the huge amount of money spent on an inherently violent and racist institution. So moving forward, um, the review process that the city is conducting needs to solicit input specifically from black and brown communities that are targeted by militarized police terror to determine if we as a community feel comfortable allocating six figure salaries to officers within the VCSO which has a failing grade on policescorecard.org The review process also needs to continually make all documents that it obtains regarding police service rates and other budgetary totals open and accessible to the public. And those are all my comments for the evening, thank you.

Okay,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role30:36

thank you Eric. Gail who's next?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:41

The next person I have listed is Nuri, I'm going to mispronounce this Ronahi. I'll unmute you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role30:53

Nuri, are you there?

0:30 – 0:368 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:57

One moment.

CommentNuri RanagiProposedself-stated31:09

Yes. Hello. Hello. Yes. This is Nuri Ranagi. My name is Nuri Ranagi, a resident of Ojai. I demand that police be abolished And Ojai provide emergency health services to people experiencing mental and emotional stress and domestic problems. Health professionals should come to an incident without an agenda to arrest or punish people. I also demand that volunteers be given access to the local jails to support people who are brought into those dehumanizing places.

In 2015, I was 75 years old driving my husband to the hospital. We were having an argument. I became agitated and pulled over in a business parking lot. The store owner offered to call the police and I accepted hoping that they would help me to calm down and continue safely. However what happened was far from healing. Three police cars with six police officers arrived quickly at the scene, they were prosecuting us separately to... They were pressuring us separately to charge against the other while neither of us wanted to complain. I told the officer I was disturbed by their large presence of police, so they arrested me.

My experience in the Ventura County jail was heart-rendering. The procedure are designed to humiliate people. My arrest had nothing to do with being armed or carrying a banned substance, yet I was strip searched and ordered to bend over so that police could look into my anus. After this procedure, I asked the lady officer if she found what was she looking for. Rather than me, she was enraged.

There were about 10 young... I'm sorry. Oh, Ellen. There were about 10 young detainees Ten young detainees, mostly mothers in a small holding cell with me walking moaning and crying arrested for minor infractions being besides themselves with worry about their children. They were pacing back and forth and in tears I did my best to be that soothing presence all the women I spoke to where

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role34:20

Thank you Neri for your remarks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:26

The next person I'm showing is Noah Lashley.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role34:31

Noah are you out there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:37

Noah, you're unmuted. You should be able to talk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed34:41

Hi can you hear me? Yes Hi, so I am mostly just going to echo sentiments that have already been said. I think the lack of transparency with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office is pretty egregious and back to the contract hasn't been updated in over 40 years is pretty indicative of a system that is not working well and it's already been said before but I feel like if we are going to spend such a huge amount of our city budget on something like the police force, I do feel like the officers or that like the police should be...

Sorry. I'm trying to catch my breath here. I am sort of flabbergasted that an entire third or almost a third of the gross budget of the City of Ohio is spent on the sheriff's office and that the Ventura County Sheriff's Office has little meaningful relationship with the greater community of Ojai. I think that, like it's already been said a huge portion of that amount of money can be reallocated towards social services that might better protect and prevent our community reallocating funds towards like the public library for example or You know, I feel like there's a lot of things that can be improved in Ojai that would benefit from that kind of care.

And so I think I'm going to yield the rest of my time but I implore that you please advocate for our community and Yeah. Thank you. Okay,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role36:40

thank you Noah. Gail next?

0:36 – 0:4216 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:45

Next is Amanda Lezra.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role36:49

Okay Amanda you're on.

CommentAmanda LezraProposedself-stated36:52

Hi can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role36:53

We can.

CommentAmanda LezraProposedself-stated36:54

Hi. Good evening, my name is Amanda Lezra. Tonight I am speaking as someone who calls Ojai home. Ojai spends $3.5 million which is 30% of its budget on law enforcement in a town with an elderly population and minimal crime. That said, I'm going to share an experience my mother had with the local law enforcement to provide insight into what happens when residents do interact with the police.

While sitting in a local bar, my mother told the owner that she thought America was becoming fascist. He firmly disagreed and then called the police. Two officers showed up. They told my mother to accompany them. When she asked why she was being arrested they slammed her face onto the wood counter and handcuffed her. She was then taken to a cell where she sat by herself for 20 hours. She was denied food, water and medication. When she didn't answer my calls all night you can imagine that I imagined the worst. She was denied a phone call until the next morning at no point was my mother told what when what she was being arrested for or when she would be released. When they did release her they didn't give her a court date or a fine It was as if nothing happened except for the bruises on her face and arms that turned purple, green and yellow.

I have pictures. Ojai spends $3.5 million which is 30% of its budget to do what I just described. The integrity of this decision is contingent upon the idea that citizens are protected with this money. My mother's experience demonstrates that they are not. We need trained mental health professionals to respond situations in which there is psychological emergency.

Is that my time?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role38:35

No, you have time keep going.

CommentAmanda LezraProposedself-stated38:37

We need de-escalation tactics to be taught and for the use of force to be severely and transparently reviewed it disclosed and called into question. The City of Ojai attempted to review its contract and services with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office multiple times over the last several years our patience was demanded however patience is earned only when there is good faith that adequate measures are being taken In this case, the only adequate measure is to rewrite the contract with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office to protect and reflect the actual needs of residents. Thank you so much for your time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role39:11

Thank you Amanda. Gail next?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed39:16

Next is Nicolette Walker and I'll unmute you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role39:22

Nicolette you're on. Hi

CommentNicolette Walker-ItzaProposedself-stated39:26

can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role39:28

Uh-huh

CommentNicolette Walker-ItzaProposedself-stated39:30

Hi, my name is Nicolette Walker-Itza and I'm speaking as a third generation Ojai resident. I'm also a local preschool teacher and I'm the mother of an elementary student. Like I said, my whole family has grown up here for generations and my personal experiences with the BCSO here in Ojai has been limited and it's also changed over the years A lot of my interactions have been very short and cold. And when I have been bold enough to speak up and ask questions, either in person or by even just calling the office, I've always felt dismissed and met with defensiveness.

And I am a white woman. And so my experiences differ completely from the black and Latino community members and friends that I have who live here who have been stopped and harassed Even taken out of their cars. I feel like our elected officials should have a say in what law enforcement practices we as a community want, and the budget spending needs to be transparent and overseen by community members for accountability.

I think that the amount that we spend is enormous especially when thinking about all the resources we lack in other areas. Our schools are being forced to cut more and more every year We're placing the burden on the working families who have to make up the difference with fundraisers, PTO. Or they have to choose to suffer the inequities if they're unable to pay those extra costs for music, art, extracurricular activities, language and health services, quality food or even onsite childcare for their children.

And in speaking about youth services I feel like I've spent time in the streets Marching and a lot of the people that are there are the youth, and they want their voices to be heard. And when we went to the police department in Ojai, nobody would address us there and nobody came out. Nobody would listen to the teenagers who were there wanting to be heard. So I feel like there can be a better use of our money. It can go to homeless services Social services that would address the widening wealth gap in our community.

And it would also relieve the duties of police and Ojai to the necessary. Also, I feel like drug rehab could be a big use of our money because a lot of the arrests that I see are for minor drug infractions. Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role42:22

You're welcome. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:25

Next is Jill Manfredi and I will unmute her.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role42:31

Jill, you are on.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:42 – 0:5119 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed42:51

With 14 years employed in local secondary education, I call upon you to step up to support black and brown lives in this momentous time of our nation with the local reallocation of policing funding. Not only do I wanna see the city of Ojai policing budget cut in half that money applied to social services and school support programs that can be better served The needs of the community, but I want the city of Ojai to insist upon prudent restrictions on the use of force by police officers currently employed.

More importantly, I want confirmation of a marked reduction in the racial profiling used by officers in our community which would help foster support of our citizens of color. In a show of solidarity, I want regular reports from the town government on the state of racist policing in our town. Specifically regarding the renegotiation of the contract with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office, I ask that the council look into sublimation of resources to support youth services in Ojai, diversity training for police staff and core virtues mentoring by certified medical professionals from outside of this community.

In addition, I believe a detailed report on the duties of officers and their habits of accruing overtime pay is in order and past due. As a taxpayer, I insist on transparency and city government and join the chorus of other cities and towns in Ventura County asking to release the Ventura County Sheriff's Department from the current contract until a new and transparent agreement can be reached.

I propose adapting a type one review board as delineated in the US Department of Justice's Citizen Review of Police Approaches and Implementation, where citizens investigate allegations of police misconduct and recommend findings to the chief or the sheriff. It is essential that this review board have independent subpoena power. The city of Ojai spends 3.4 million plus on its general fund on police services, and such a large sum deserves new oversight considering the loss of income from the COVID-19 closures of business and hotel transient taxes.

What are we really getting for our money? Thank you for your time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role45:30

You're welcome thank you. Gail next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed45:34

Next is Ted Nava and I will unmute you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role45:38

Okay, Ted you're on. There

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed45:46

he goes. Hey before i start real quick I'd like to check to make sure that Emma Bailey is logged in she's been having some technical difficulties but she's here with me now hello

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:01

I'm sorry. Are you saying she's present with you?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed46:05

Yeah, yeah. I just wanted to make sure she was on the meeting, on the call so that she could make her comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:09

She's not showing on the list on my computer screen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed46:15

Is Tara Saylor logged on or in the queue?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:17

I'm sorry. Could you repeat that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed46:19

Is Tara Saylor in the queue?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:21

No, she's not listed either.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed46:24

Well, Emma Bailey is with me. So maybe after I make my comment, she can just make hers on the same line if there's a technical problem.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed46:30

Sure, I think that's fine,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed46:32

Ted. Thank you. Um, I was privileged to grow up in Ojai in a family of means insulated from the city that I loves ongoing war on its own poor and that is one of the functions of privilege to allow us to turn a blind eye to the dark systemic realities that our lifestyles uphold In a lot of ways, this is the dream of modern Ojai to be able to hide away from the world's troubles smiling on through rose-colored glasses at a failing civic system just so long as property values stay high.

Ojai is a city that has continually neglected to develop the services necessary to care for our poorest and most vulnerable members preferring instead to let that work much of which is the normal provenance of city governments fall to volunteer organizations and our lone social services nonprofit Help of Ojai is an incredible organization that deserves all our love and support, but they should not have to bear the full weight of service to our community. Not when there is plenty of funding available waiting to be justly reallocated from the bloated exploitative and unaccountable contract with the VCSO that many others are detailing in great depth tonight.

Homeless services, mental health services, food security, community and government mutual education, free afterschool programs, disaster relief, housing justice. These are the things that contribute to a dynamic diverse and thriving community. Instead we overpay disaffected and overarmed officers to spend their days keeping the city's homeless population out of the sight of profitable tourists.

Ojai's tourist economy thrives on the backs of its working poor, a demographic who increasingly cannot afford to live within the tightly controlled city limits, disallowing them to vote on issues that directly affect them such as how they are policed and further disenfranchising the majority of our population. All of this has resulted in a city segregated along lines of race and class, a city that reinforces the popular American narrative of toxic poverty. That everyone is economically where they deserve to be when we know for a fact that there are deep systemic reasons for this.

I believe that we can do better. We have a chance now to participate with leader communities across the country in revolutionizing the way we understand public safety and service to our community, and in developing compassionate civic systems that improve the quality of life for all people, not just the rich and not just the white. We must defund and reallocate now. Thank you for your time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role48:51

Thank you Ted. Okay Emma you're up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed48:55

All right can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role48:56

Yep

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed48:57

Okay, I respectfully question our city's allocations for our contract with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office. I question the sheriff's efficacy. I question their objectives, their quotas, their arrest records. I question their use of force policies, their complaint protocols and their transparency and reportage. I questioned they're shown biases. Essentially, I seriously question if the City of Ojai is receiving the most yield per dollar spent on public safety as I have no way of assessing the value of BCSO service to my community.

It is for this reason that I call upon this council to continue their formal review and restructuring of this contract. Tonight, we are hearing the voices of the public while we examine our shared relationship with the Sheriff's Office. I myself am speaking as a woman who at one time sought a kind of justice through the Sheriff's Office. I live here in Ojai because I moved home from college to file charges and give an interview to a detective of the Sheriff's Office Violent Crimes Unit.

I had low expectations and a specific objective in coming forward with charges. I knew the district attorney would not bring me justice in the same way I knew that the sheriff's office could not and had not made me safe from a violent crime. And had these charges progressed, I would not have wanted the offender to serve jail time. What I wanted was accountability and a paper trail of evidence for anyone else who would come forward after me. I wanted the offender to feel afraid and look deeply within themselves about their actions, and I knew his incarceration would not heal anyone. I knew that my healing would come from my community, that my safety would come from my community and not the law. I think that this is something that Council must hear.

We must acknowledge that crime and criminalization are both issues of public health. The crimes of sexual assault and domestic violence are a threat to our collective health in the same way as the criminalization of poverty, mental illness, and substance disorders. In this way also question the underlying philosophies of law enforcement and public safety. It would be insufficient for this council to patiently wait for our client-provider relationship with the Sheriff's Office to improve, waiting for the sheriff to respond to our letters, to agree to our contractual stipulations. I have seen you met with resistance in years past. To that, I'm here remind you that any reason for you to recuse yourselves as an elected official from reviewing and restructuring this contract would be unacceptable to your constituents as you've accepted responsibility for oversight of our municipal contracts.

I need not remind you that our 40-year-old contract in no way empowers us to set standards of performance, policies, objectives or oversight over our own jurisdiction. There is no reason why we cannot enshrine standards of performance well above the county and state mandates that BCSO is already responsible for meeting. There's no reason why we can't expand the definition of police officers to include peace officers, social workers and mental health professionals.

I expect there to be a series of community forums for the public to participate in the restructuring of this contract and the equitable reallocations of money we spend on BCSO, on methods that meaningfully serve the public good. I hope tonight that you listen deeply to the comments that you receive. You are hearing a wide array of points of view calling for specific contractual demands and reallocation goals.

0:52 – 0:5921 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role52:08

Thank you, Emma. Sorry for the bells and whistles

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:12

there.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role52:16

Where are we?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:17

The next person is Chris Barton.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role52:21

Okay. Is Chris unmuted? Chris, are you there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:28

Now he should be. Yeah, can you hear me?

CommentChris BartonProposedself-stated52:30

Yeah, you're on. Yeah, I'm Chris Barton born and raised in Ojai. And yeah, I just like to say I can guarantee that we don't need to be spending 30% of our budget on police. That's three and a half million dollars which is more per capita than any other city in the county. I believe we should be reallocating these funds from the police into mental health services drug rehab resources for the homeless and education We need to be addressing our societal problems at the source rather than responding to them with a militarized police force.

And I was so far listening this meeting, it seems like this is what the community wants and we need the police budget to be transparent and in alignment with what the community wants. So we need to take some of those budget and put it in other places thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role53:32

Thank

CommentChris BartonProposedself-stated53:32

you,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role53:32

Chris. Okay, Gail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:36

Next person is Holly Johnson and she's unmuted. Hi, can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed53:44

you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role53:46

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed53:48

Thank you for allowing us all to speak on this timely passionate topic I'm so I'm so touched by all my community members, what they've said so far. And I'm going to echo most everything that has been said. I'm speaking as a 20-year-old resident of the Valley, a witness to the increased national awareness and response of social justice issues, the National Call for Defunding Police, and I say the time is now. The existing contract with the Ventura County Sheriff's Office is long overdue for review. I stand with the points of concern laid out by the City Council's letter to Sheriff Ayoub dated on July 9th. In addition, I am sensitive and aware of larger issues of policing in this nation and therefore question the validity and necessity of armed officers responding to all calls for community assistance.

Witnessing time and again historically the use of unnecessary force, the issue of unconscious bias within the human species, racial profiling, and increased militarization of police, it emboldens me to speak up on this matter There are ample examples of cities that have undergone or currently revising their city budgets to better reflect the needs of its citizens. With roughly 30% of this city's budget dedicated to law enforcement in a town with relatively little violent crime, it is high time to reevaluate where this money could be better spent. The impact of COVID is still rippling through our community on all levels and it is deeply irresponsible, unimaginative and unwise to spend so much of the city budget on policing when it could be better spent addressing the diverse needs for community services.

As stated in the Washington Post article of June 12th by sociologist Pat Sharkey one of many articles written on this topic do we need the police? The idea that residents and local organizations can play a central role in creating safe and strong communities is not new, and it is not particularly controversial. And yet we have never made the same commitment to these groups that we make to law enforcement. It is not hard to envision a place where police officers are confined to serve as backup to outreach officers, counselors, mediators, social service providers, unarmed traffic agents, EMTs and become involved only if first responders request assistance for an arrest. In this unprecedented time in history council members please take every opportunity possible to prioritize investigate and evaluate ways to reduce the ongoing day-to-day need for the police presence in our town Thank you so much for giving me this time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role56:31

You're welcome, Holly. Gail next?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed56:33

Next is Harmony Wade-Hack.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role56:38

Okay. Is Harmony unmuted? Yes. Yep we can hear you. You're on.

CommentHarmony Wade-HackProposedself-stated56:45

Great thank you. My name is Harmony Wade-Hack and I've been a resident of Ojai for about 20 years and I am going to echo what so many others have said before. I have witnessed the over-policing Ohio is subject to and I'm upset that we spend 30% of our general budget on a police force in a town with very little crime. I'm upset that we spend 30% of our general budget on a police force when there are so many other social needs that money could go toward, needs that if addressed would actually help prevent the situations that the police are called for.

The list is very long and. What is in question is our priorities as a community. I think most of us who have lived in Ojai for a long time, have witnessed traffic stops with like four police cars. There is clearly not enough of a need for the resources that we give the Sheriff's Office I think it's also outrageous that our contract with the Sheriff's Department hasn't been updated in 40 years, and that the police who get so much of our money operate with little to no oversight.

So as a resident of Ojai, I ask that the council renegotiate the contract with VCSO and drastically reduce the money we give them. That money should be directed to services that actually serve our community. Thank you for the opportunity to speak.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role58:46

Thank you, Harmony.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:52

Next is Gregory Trigub. I'm mispronouncing your last name probably and you are unmuted.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role59:01

Gregory, you're on.

0:59 – 1:0413 turns

CommentGregory TregubProposedself-stated59:05

Hello, all members of the Council. My name is Gregory Tregub. This is just further emphasis of what everyone has said so far which is incredibly important. I'm making an urgent demand for defunding the excessive spending on policing and not investing in humanitarian social services. I am privileged to not have had such a violating experience with the police like some have shared earlier But firsthand stories are too common of individuals being denied basic rights, being violently mistreated by the police and the police being held unaccountable for their actions.

I demand a substantial decrease in the policing portion of the city budget. I question policing behavior and the calls that we have made law enforcement officers to respond to. A question to what degree the majority of the budgets across Ventura County spent on law enforcement meaningfully serve our objectives for public safety? Metrics of arrests and dispatched arrival times do not paint a full enough picture of true public safety, and thorough data about the VSCO is very difficult to find. We need more transparency.

Currently, every aspect of the city budget is being considered for budget cuts. It is the council's responsibility to review police spending especially in light of the severe financial hardship the city is facing due to COVID-19. The council should review the terms of the contract with the VSCO to ensure their behavior matches the public expectations and the public welfare. The $3.5 million currently allocated to law enforcement services can be put to use in services which reflect more of our community priorities and values. There are numerous services such as education, housing development, mental health support, de-escalation professionals, drug rehabilitations, and more that would be beneficial to building community safety and trust. Ojai can be a model for a safe nonviolent community with supportive and just system for its citizens.

Thank you for your time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:00:56

Thank you, Greg. Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:59

Next is Helena Pascarella. Okay.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:01:04

And... Unmuted?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:08

I'm trying. There she goes. Okay,

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:01:11

Helena, you're on. Helena?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:01:18

Hello?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:01:19

Hello? Helena, can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:01:21

Yes, I can hear you. Can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:01:23

I can hear you. You're on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:01:25

Okay, great. Thank you so much for allowing us to participate in this meeting. I have mixed relations with the police department. I'm a homeowner here. I just returned to Ojai after being away for about 15 years three years ago And my mom lived here. And the reason I am wanting to speak is because we've had, like I said, positive and negative experiences with the Sheriff's Department. And I believe that much of it could have been avoided. The negative as people are saying how we should have mental health professionals with the police and it's not fair to ask them to be psychologists when they go out on calls In my situation what happened, my 70 year old mother was actually arrested for aggravated trespassing because she was trying to enter or bang on the door of the neighbor who was a tenant at the time.

And so I wasn't here. My mom is an immigrant and I often wondered had she been a different type of person? And the other people were immigrants as well how would this situation have played out And I've never spoken about this. And what I really would like to have also is kind of a truth and reconciliation day where we can, because there's fear. And the only reason I'm having the courage to talk about this is that all these people and young people in both of our country are out there talking The injustices that they have witnessed or experienced with the police department. And as people are saying about it being over militarized for such a peaceful, wonderful community.

So I wanna have some type of truth reconciliation where we can all talk about this and have them listen to us and explain to us and be there. But I also have to say just last six months ago My mom who has Alzheimer's and part of her issues from 10 years ago was because of her, I think beginnings of Alzheimer's. She was lost. I lost my mother and thank God I had the Sheriff's Department who helped me find her but you know it could have been a different type of peace officer is what I'm thinking as well. It doesn't have to be a militarized type of police that we have.

Thank you again for letting me talk. I appreciate this.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:03:55

Thank you Elena for your comments. Okay, Gail do any of the names that are higher up on the list like Ryan Bigler as he called in or Joe Manfredi?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:04:08

Yes some of them have signed in and I don't have a Ryan Bigler showing but I have an RB and I'm going to guess that's Ryan so I'm going to put him in the queue next Whoops, where did it go? There it is.

1:04 – 1:109 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:04:29

Hello yes you guessed right.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:04:32

Ryan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:04:32

okay you're on. Great among others I'm questioning the budget allocation in our town when i learned that the residents of Ojai pay more per capita than any other city and county for our contract with VCSO and subsequently how much of our total budget is consumed by that, I certainly question the lack of oversight of their services So I'm calling for substantial additional oversight. This call is further exasperated by the displays of violence used by the police forces around the country as a demand for racial justice has been ignited in the wake of George Floyd's death. This violence is indicative of a broken system that trickles down to and is kept afloat by its local entities. When we demonstrated outside the Ojai Sheriff Office, They chose to completely ignore us instead of standing with their community.

They stand on the side of their system because to do otherwise is to risk termination and regardless of that, VCSO should be held to the same standard as any other city contract and the contract with VCSO is admittedly outdated a bad business deal and needs to be renegotiated with considerable fervor because I think we've waited long enough These funds, in my opinion could be vital to other services. And I have to ask are we truly putting our money towards the most optimal ways to ensure public safety? I believe that we can invest in our community's safety and well-being in different ways a lot have been cited.

Ways that are preventive and proactive instead of militarized and reactionary One of those ways is to reallocate the funds towards programs that explicitly make space for community development on house people getting support, direct action to help substance harm reduction and staffing qualified professionals to handle crises because it takes longer to become a barber than it does to become a cop. So to give officers such a wide scope of responsibility seems Irresponsible, to say the least.

As a loud queer person growing up in Ojai, the police never made me feel safe. Far from it. What would have made me feel safe was community-funded programs that made spaces that actively showed me support as I learned about myself. I can only speak to my experience but I'm sure there are other marginalized communities in Ojai who feel the exact same way. So I call for a formal review of the contract and demand that substantial and tangible action is taken to change the way we put our money where our mouth is in terms of allocating funds to serve our community to the best of our ability.

Thank you so much for your time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:07:17

Thank You Ryan okay Gail

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:21

next we have Meadow Crosby

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:07:24

okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:30

She should be unmuted now.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:07:33

Meadow, you're on the air. Meadow?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed1:07:41

Hello there. Sorry. I'm still trying to figure out the Zoom stuff. Thank you so much. I am so happy to be here and speak. I would just like to share my experiences with Ojai Police. I lived in a van about a couple years ago In the middle of the night, I got a knock on my door. Very violent five men shining lights into me and they're like, I see you, I see you wake up, wake up! So I got up and opened the door and I was in my pajamas and I have my surfboards in my van and their attitude immediately changed. I'm a white woman and they were like oh how's the surf?

Yeah, just like five men. It was very excessive and I did not feel safe. I said should I move my car? They said no go back to sleep but yeah you can't park here. I don't know if someone called me in but... And then another experience I had about two weeks ago was I got pulled over and I drive like an 88 Nissan kind of beat up truck And so it's called a pretextual stop when they stop you for something very trivial to see if you have a warrant for your arrest or you're on probation, or you don't pay your insurance because you're poor. Or your licenses or your tags are expired whatever. I mean my tags were not expired but they said that my surfboards were too long out of my truck And I know for a fact that wasn't true, but I'm scared of them so I just said okay.

And they let me off with a warning this was two weeks ago and yeah, I looked it up it's a four foot minimum my boards were a foot and a half at the most. So these officers are obviously very bored and they told me I had to take the trailer hitch off of my license plate so that they can see my license. So I did that And then I got pulled over yesterday, driving home from work. And they told me that I had plastic on my license plate and that I need to take that off. And I told them I said you guys pulled me over two weeks ago for having the trailer hitch ball thing in front of my license plate but you didn't mention the plastic cover thing and they're like oh yeah that's weird And yeah, I mean they let me off with a warning but I'm just going to say that these officers are way overfunded.

They have nothing to do they're looking around they're just looking to make poor people more poor and just harassing the low income people and I think I get away with it because I'm white I get away with it because I can afford to pay my insurance, afford to stay out of jail. But it's like what if I didn't have that privilege? So just want you guys to think about that and how these people are really servicing our community in a negative way so thank you.

1:11 – 1:1610 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:11:02

Next we have Natasha Efros.

CommentNatasha EfrosProposedself-stated1:11:10

Hello, can you hear me?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:11:11

Yes we can, Natasha you're on.

CommentNatasha EfrosProposedself-stated1:11:13

All right thank you council members my name is Natasha Efros I am a resident of Ojai, I am mother, I'm a public school teacher and I feel our community needs to re-examine the place of law enforcement in our lives The last many weeks have made it clear how damaging the police can be for people who are already marginalized by systematic racism, by poverty and our inability to adequately support folks who are struggling for various reasons.

And I want to advocate for a change for an additional reason. I live in Ojai because I value community and I feel my fellow Ojaians do as well. I see this value reflected in the Ojai Search and Rescue Team, of which my husband is a member. I see this reflected in the Upper Ojai Relief Group that supported people affected by both the Thomas fire and COVID doing things like wellness checks for vulnerable community members in our neighborhood.

And I have realized that the handing off Safety, violence prevention and the mediation of community conflict to outside institutions like the police does not support my need to care for and feel cared by my community. And that is what creates meaning in my life is to be connected to my community in caring ways and indirect ways. And so I am calling for a shift in how we spend our tax dollars to better reflect the caring community that I feel we all want to be. Um, I suggest reallocating much of our police funding, um, to unarmed health and social workers who could respond peacefully to emergency health and de-escalation needs.

And who could also facilitate local volunteers to continue to enhance safety violence prevention conflict resolution and doing things like wellness checks, perhaps inspired by the way search and rescue and upper Ohio relief serve our communities. So I just hope that we can emerge from this historical moment a more caring integrated close-knit community that serves all of its citizens so I thank you for helping our budget reflect that legacy that we all want to leave to our children and grandchildren. It feels like the most important work we can be doing right now, and I will keep working towards that until that work is done. So thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:14:07

Thank you Natasha. Okay Gail, I see three or four more names that haven't checked in yet, maybe five.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:14:16

Okay, next I'm showing Andrew Belknap.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:14:20

Okay. Hi,

CommentAndra BelknapProposedself-stated1:14:27

I'm here. Can you hear

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:14:27

me? Yeah, we can. You may proceed.

CommentAndra BelknapProposedself-stated1:14:31

Oh gosh now I have to find my comment. Okay, here I am. Hi City Council. Thank you so much for making it possible to hear my comment. It means a lot My name is Andra Belknap. I'm a resident of Ojai. I have spoken to most of you about this issue, so I will keep my comments brief. To me this issue is pretty simple as a city, a full third of our budget is allocated to a public agency that this body can barely get to return a phone call That level of service is unacceptable, period. To put this in context for the public our current contract with Ventura County Sheriff's Office has not been meaningfully revised since the early 80s even though the text of the contract calls for revisions each five years at most. The Ventura County Grand Jury called on the Ventura County Sheriff's Office to revise their contracts with contract cities like Ojai in 2012 they still have not done it furthermore Taxpayers have no ability to quantitatively evaluate the service we receive because VCSO provides so little transparency, and I have to suspect that is by design.

My review of the Ventura County Sheriff's Office arrest data that is available shows that our money is funding a police force that predominantly deals with misdemeanors and drug offenses and predominantly stops Latino and Black community members. Pardon me, disproportionately stops Latino and black community members. It is beyond clear to me and I hope to you as well that this is an agency in dire need of reform. Our money is not being well spent and this community is not being treated with respect. I hope the council will recognize the unique political moment we're in, recognize the dire financial straits this community is in, and carefully reconsider what appears to be a blank check to Ventura County Sheriff's Office. Thank you.

1:16 – 1:2118 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:16:21

So we have two more. Next is Liam. Liam Lesra. And one moment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:16:36

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:16:38

OK.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:16:42

OK, Liam, you may proceed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:16:45

Thank you. I was just here to say that $3.5 million spent on a community with a population of roughly 7,500 people is truly mind-blowing to me. I have to ask myself what is it for? How is it used? And when I look around Ojai, I see on an average day if any of us stand on El Roblar for 10 minutes we're likely to see three police cars. Yeah this makes rich law abiding homeowners feel safe these are the citizens that the police serve The rest of us feel constantly under surveillance.

I have lived in the community for many years, I've worked for a nonprofit in the community. I've been a business owner and I pay taxes. A few years ago, I was almost arrested when I locked myself out of my apartment at 10 in the morning and a neighbor called the police to say someone was trying to break in when I tried to climb into my bathroom window. Uh, the two young men in uniforms came to my house.

They forced us to walk outside downstairs and away from our building questioned us for 20 minutes, then forced me to stay outside while one officer led my partner into our house alone to find proof of residence. The treatment we had received at that point was rude and confrontational so after several minutes I started feeling nervous and asked that I be allowed to walk upstairs to join her. The officer threatened to arrest me if I moved.

What struck me about the interaction is that while my partner and I needed to get to work, the officers interrogating us seemed to have all the time in the world. Some people may say She and I should have felt more comfortable and safer knowing that the police were available and would respond quickly if someone was in fact breaking into our apartment. But that treatment of being forced to not only walk out of our house, but walk away from the building. And one of us, the one who was smaller, the one who was younger, the one who looked actually easier to mistreat or to like to have power over, was actually forced to go upstairs while I was forced to stay downstairs. I don't understand the separation. I don't understand the tactics and I don' feel safe.

And so again $3.5 million for 7500 people. I don't see what it does except create an atmosphere of surveillance over policing and really just riddle our streets with uniforms That's not the Ojai I want to live in. That's not the Shangri-La I imagined when I moved here, and I hope that it changes. I really do. And everything that everyone has said about the services that we can offer our community education support for the homeless, support for disabled.

That's where I would like to see our money spent. And so I really hope this is considered. Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:19:38

Thank you, Liam.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:19:41

There's one more and there's no name associated with it. It's just a telephone number, so if it's okay with you I'll allow the speaker to talk and share their name with us themselves.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:19:52

Okay that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:19:53

fine. Don't forget the recording. Okay um there's a speaker with a phone number that ends in 7515. You're unmuted you may speak This is Emma Bailey. I'm just looking in now. Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:20:13

Oh,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:20:14

OK. OK. I am going to mute her again. OK.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:20:18

So we have like three that were planning to talk to us but we haven't heard from

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:20:25

And one of those three, Megan Rudd submitted a written comment and so I will just remind you that there were eight written comments submitted on this issue. Some of the people spoke and some didn't but those were provided to council at about 5 p.m. today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:20:43

Mayor, I believe that James Hahn is prepared to play the recording submitted by Dr. Megan Rudd.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:20:57

Yes, I believe we are able to play it if assuming council desires us to play it, we can play that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:21:04

I would like to hear it.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:21:06

Okay go ahead and play it. It's a couple of minutes, I assume. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:21:19

We're getting it ready.

1:21 – 1:4120 turns

CommentDr. Megan RuddProposedself-stated1:21:44

Hi, my name is Dr. Megan Rudd and I'm speaking as an advocate for the mentally ill. This population often interfaces with police officers during moments of their greatest suffering and law enforcement officials often aren't trained on how to respond to people in this state. Let me tell you first a little bit about my background. I'm a licensed psychologist specializing in clinical psychology. For the last eight years, I've had a private practice in Ojai and I've been a professor at Pacifica Graduate Institute in Carpinteria.

Previous to becoming licensed, I worked for five years part-time at Aurora Vista Del Mar Hospital, the only private psychiatric hospital in Ventura County. While working at the psychiatric hospital, I learned a lot about severe mental illness. I learned that most people suffering from severe mental illness are not violent. In fact, according to the Health and Human Services Department, the vast majority of people with mental health problems are no more likely to be violent than anyone else.

In fact, people with severe mental illness are over 10 times more likely to be victims of violent crime than the general population. Now I can tell you that at first glance it isn't always apparent that people experiencing a mental health crisis aren't more violent than the general population. Interacting with someone who is, for instance, manic and acting highly irrationally or who is responding to internal stimuli and is paranoid or who is intoxicated by or coming down from drugs or alcohol and is highly anxious and irritated. It feels scary!

At these moments, people are not exhibiting normal behaviors. So the instinctual reaction to witnessing these odd behaviors is the stress response to fight it or flight. It takes a certain type of personality combined with training and experience to not follow one's instinctual reaction to engage in verbal or physical conflict or to get the hell away. Training 101 for working in a psychiatric hospital is that using a calm, comforting language that makes the person feel safe is the best way to de-escalate a situation.

Now imagine your typical police officer. Is this how they are trained to resolve a problem? It's no wonder police involvement with people, especially people of color who are going through a mental health crisis too often escalates in what was an easily resolvable issue turns violent or even lethal. Reducing the law enforcement budget and reallocating these dollars into community-based services that address mental health and safety, including the high rate of homelessness in the mentally ill population is an appropriate reallocation of law enforcement public safety funds.

As we are engaging in a meaningful dialogue of what public safety actually means, I believe it is important for trained mental health professionals to be deployed to respond to a mental health emergency instead of heavily armed and minimally entrained law enforcement.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:25:10

Okay. Is that it Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:25:14

Yes, that's it.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:25:15

Okay, that's in the record. Thank you for submitting that. Okay, we have two unaccounted for but I guess that brings us to the conclusion of citizen input and we'll take this back to the City Council seeing how we would like to proceed. Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:25:46

You know, we've all been asked to review tapes of other council meetings and we've all had people you know community members share with us their concerns. And I wrote a kind of my brief thoughts on it. I'd like to be able to read that. I don't know when it's appropriate

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:26:06

Okay, well I'll tell you what. Why don't we start with you Randy but while we go around the table once everybody can make their comments whatever they choose and then I'll ask for a motion if we have some motion we'll put it on the floor and we'll have something to discuss otherwise

we'll move to the next discussion item. Perfect. Okay, so pick it off.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:26:28

Thank you Mayor because I believe this is one of the most important topics we've discussed in City Council. I took some time to write down my brief thoughts rather than just speaking off the top of my head which you guys have all seen me do I'll start by saying that I'm in complete agreement that now is the time to review, reform and provide complete transparency in our community regarding our contract with Ventura County Sheriff's Office. I think we are fortunate that this renewal comes at a time when our country is struggling to face the issue of racism and police reform with more honesty and a willingness to grow and change.

I have to admit that I was first jolted by the concept of defunding the police. But sometimes to get our attention, we have to get past the phrasing and be jolted into recognizing that there is a problem. Change can't begin until we're willing to look at something from a different perspective. This means that we are not only have to acknowledge the problem, we also have to admit that we just don't know what we don't know.

The first step towards change is to listen and to pay attention. To what others are saying and feeling, we need to realize that we are all human beings. We're prone to good and bad decisions but most importantly, we must be willing to work toward the greater good. So let's start with all sides sitting down at the table and helping each other better understand the differences in difficulties of living, working and policing in our ever changing community.

Police reform is not a one-sided conversation. As we expect our police departments to change, grow and become more transparent, we must expect this of ourselves as well. The time is long overdue to truly commit to facing the reality of systemic racism in America. And as a community, we need to ask ourselves how we can become part of the solution? We may want to start with a resolution on behalf of the city of Ojai, acknowledging that black lives matter and that we will not condone participate in or accept any form of racism bigotry or intolerance in our community. So again I believe that we can after tonight's meeting vote on a resolution regarding that.

While this is important, ultimately there are other words on a page. These are other words on a page unless we're willing to put action behind them. In addition to acknowledging the problem and listening to those who have concerns, we need to form a plan of action and follow through on that plan. Throughout the history of racial strife in our country, we've gotten to the point where reports are written. Plans for change are made but not enough effort to support the change makes it actually happen. Let's be different this time especially on our watch Our current sheriff's contract consumes 33% of our city budget. It is time to have clarity regarding the services that are provided, their associated costs and how they are serving the needs of our community especially in regards to racial disparity.

We need to determine if and how the existing services can be modified. If we can add or delete certain services based on needs and what new services or types of policing will be available with new reforms. Finally, I want to add this. Ojai is one of five cities in our county. The contract with the Ventura County Sheriff's Department, I think it behooves us to be smart and not go alone.

Though we are the smallest of the five cities, our needs are not unique. I believe the OHAI can lead the way in helping design a better contract that addresses and deals with the issue of racism, making our community and the entire Ventura region a more welcoming and safer place for everyone. And I look forward to the continued discussion this evening on these matters. Thank you Mayor.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:30:26

Okay thanks Randy. Okay uh i don't see a gallery shot so I can't see anybody's hand but who would like to go next?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:30:35

I'll be if I was it

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:30:37

okay Susan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:30:38

Randy, thank you for your excellent comments. I support everything that you said and I appreciate that you made a prepared statement with very well said. I also want to thank the public for what they expressed. I share all their concerns and there's suggestions about reallocating funds. There were a few moments when I disagreed with how some of our officers are characterized, and I want to remind the public that our current chief due to COVID is not able to interact with the community as much as our previous chief did. You know, the previous chief Fryhoff had coffee with the chief and it was very well attended and it really allowed the public to interact which is so important but um so we can't you know we can't blame him for that I feel like we have a wonderful new chief.

A couple of questions I would like, one of many questions. I would like clarity. Is it true that Ojai is used as a training ground? How does it work? I realize that I'm really ignorant if officers are consistently assigned or if we have like how does it work so that they know the community? I'd like information on that. And then I would like to know how much time is spent, do the homeless get ticketed?

We absolutely need to have a safe place for the homeless to sleep. They should not be ticketed for...I don't think that they are but I'd like clarity on that And then, you know a couple of my own observations and I'm sure this is very typical in a city where there aren't enough mental health or drug and alcohol rehab services. When I was working in downtown Ojai over the years I would see the same person, you know, lying on the sidewalk looking like he was passed out. I would go check and then I'd see the officers take him to jail and then I'd see the same person, you know, the officers would be around him in Libbey Park And then again and again, and when I spoke to them they said yes. We take him to jail that he gets cleaned up sober, he gets the meal and then they release him on the street.

So it's obvious what's named that's a revolving door so we could call it when someone is rearrested multiple times until either they die or Or they do something worse and they stay in jail for a long time. So it's so clear that if we could allocate funds to prevent that type of revolving door among other issues, I don't know how it works reallocating funds. So I'd like to find out how that works, if we're allowed to do that or there's a set all these things

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:34:05

The answer to that question is the first you have to have the funds and that is a real dilemma right now. We're talking about trying to cut costs for money we don't have, so it's not going to be reallocated at this point. Now when the economy recovers then we'd be able to have something to talk about.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:34:22

Yeah I was just asking if the contract is already for a set amount and that's not negotiable? Is that correct?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:34:32

I think everything's negotiable. We just have to, that's what our committees, subcommittees engage

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:34:37

in.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:34:39

They may say it's not and I would not put this all on the sheriff. The rates that we're talking about are set by the county CEO and the board of supervisors based on input from the sheriff but it's cost accounted figure out what does a deputy cost? How many deputies do you need? That type of thing. So maybe there's a way to take a little less service at that point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:35:02

Yeah, I think the public is asking for clarification on that what we can and cannot legally do right now. Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:35:10

Okay, thanks, Susan. Good comments. Bill Ryan. Brian, you'd be okay if

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:35:18

I go ahead or Go ahead. You know, I think we're as has already been mentioned Really eloquent statements by Councilperson Haney and Francina. We're at a historic moment here. These times are really demanding us to step up between what we're hearing from the public and what we're seeing. I am trying to, you know, To say I'm optimistic that all parties to the situation understand that there's going to have to be thorough review.

And just to be blunt about it, it turns out apparently that all the contract cities have the same kind of archaic arrangements from 40 years ago. Where we're literally in a very, incredibly demanding and sensitive relationship between county and cities dealing with less fiduciary and auditing oversight than we would be expected to. Then we are demanded that we pay when we hire a street overlay company. If we were engaged in the kind of practices that have gone on for 40 years, you know. That would be an audit finding if that's how we handled our street overlay program.

So I think that it's extremely important. It's a matter of and this is what I've kind of come to an understanding of. This is really a core fiduciary responsibility for each one of us. If we are for one reason or another and we can get into a long There's various angles on that. Paying an outlier fee for services rendered, then that demands our scrutiny. And then on top of that where we don't really have a relationship between service provider and client that by agreement or contractual stipulation references standards of practice represents expectations of how to resolve issues in that relationship, then all of that needs to be updated. And again when you're talking about something from 1980 and not reviewed periodically not reviewed in a timely fashion, you're going to get these imbalances.

You're going to get by just a natural accretion of contradictions. You're going to get problems built into that relationship that this is the time to address. I just want to mention a couple little facts that I've come across recently. In 1980, the cost of one 24-7 patrol unit was approximately $180,000 when we started each patrol unit. The sheriff says we need a minimum of two in our service area, which they say is the city jurisdiction.

If you take just an inflation adjustment on that money from 1980 to 2018, that's $550,000. They're currently pricing each 24-7 patrol unit and again, as the mayor mentioned, we don't really know how they're coming up with the number of approximately 1.3 million each, so obviously in real terms the resources have gone up considerably it's just something to think about but there is also another issue since 1980 an outside agency defined a service area for each city called the sphere of influence and My way, I think if these contracts have been reviewed frequently we'd be understanding and maybe the minimum service standard is for the service area not the city jurisdiction.

Why does that matter? Because the other contract cities have jurisdiction areas very close to sphere of influence areas were only 54%. So implicit in the fact that the contracts have not been updated in a timely fashion, we kind of lose contact with the community's expectations and the outside reference to standards of practices. not by conspiracy, but the effect of that is that we're paying for a lot of the overhead of servicing our sphere of influence. It's outside our city jurisdiction and we're talking about a lot of money when you just balance that one factor So I think in terms of a fiduciary responsibility, in terms of standards and practice building community trust, addressing concerns of the community.

This is the time and I really am hopeful that across the political spectrum of opinion everybody understands you don't let a contract go for 40 years without revision, without updating. I think to speak to Councilperson Haney's comment, I think that's something that gets traction across all the contract cities. And when we then point out that imposing a standardized contract on each contract city is by definition not going to best serve The taxpayers in terms of the maximizing the debt benefit of services rendered. You can't take one instrument and apply it to a diverse set of characteristics and expect to serve the taxpayers in the best fashion.

1:41 – 1:5712 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:41:48

I suggest that you- I just wanna say, now's your time. I would suggest that you and Ryan have that conversation with the sheriff's office first rather than to be one sided negotiating. On the TV. I mean, I think it would make a lot of good points and they should be able to give you some reasonable answers if they can't then we have to figure out what

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:42:10

our alternatives are.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:42:11

I guess what I'm trying to say Mayor one sentence is the problems in fact are systemic with not going into timely revisions and updating these contracts that's what's really got to change

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:42:24

okay uh well on that point let me give I'm going to go ahead and ask for a motion. Needed some explaining, and it was out of date. I totally agree with you that it seems absurd that we would be on a master contract that was 40 years old. But the reality is that master contract is basically an open PO with adjustments for inflation and demand for services from the customer. We don't have to buy any, and they don't have to serve any. But the county has said, yes, the cities can buy those services even though they're incorporated and we'll share the cost. And I think you've made a good point over the last three and a half years I've worked with you is that that sharing is not really been looked at for a long time and is disproportionately being placed as a couple of our citizens tonight said on 7000 people in four square miles.

So it is the county and the county auditors Whoever figures out these rates, that we need to first find out what the unit cost is. That I suppose is a factual thing and then the question is who says we have to buy you know a whole unit? A multiple of units or possibly like in Los Angeles they used to sell a fraction of a unit. I think the reality of the City Council's face with is that we do not, we don't have a balanced budget now. We adopted one but because of the pandemic our budget is no longer balanced and the amount of money that we're not taking in, I don't know if the public's aware this city manager maybe wants to chime in But my understanding is the last period for revenues from our major tax source, which is the transit occupancy tax.

Which was normally $300,000, the city got $10,000. Now that's not going to be a great argument with the sheriff who's gonna say I still have to pay my people. But we should have that discussion with the county to say look, and be sure that we are not paying more than we should, or that we can afford. And I think you have really made it pretty clear over the years that the day is coming when we can no longer afford to pay the price and we gotta figure out what we're gonna do without.

I'm saying this because whoever's listening in the community and the people who have taken their time tonight to talk to us, that they think there's extra money there And there isn't going to be in the short term, but that's no reason for us not to address exactly what you and Ryan are gonna go talk to the sheriff about. Ryan, you haven't spoken yet. Do you wanna weigh in?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:45:24

Thank you. First I just really want to thank everybody for calling in speaking tonight. I understand it's kind of not the easiest thing to get on Zoom and a city council meeting from the public side and thank you for all the wonderful comments. And thank you to kind of everybody in Ojai and outside of Ojai who is having this conversation because this is a long overdue conversation that makes a lot of people uncomfortable And it's not easy to have this conversation. And people have, I think part of the reason why we haven't seen our contract look at and some of these other things have festered for a long time is because nobody's been willing to step up and really say hey, we're going to, we're not going to stand by and allow the same thing to happen again.

And there's a couple reasons for that right? One is the current situation we're in with COVID For us as a city that is uniquely different from some of the other communities that do share in these services, is that we are the most significantly negatively impacted city economically due to COVID because of tourism. And the reality is we can't afford to pay this amount anymore. And we have asked everybody to take cuts from our staff, to every different part of our budget having a look at it. And this part should not be immune and everybody needs to share in some of the pain that we're all experiencing. So that's one aspect that we have to look at here and it's an important fact But also the social issues and the racial injustice issue that is going on in the community and in society as a whole, is part of this.

It's not just our contract. There are issues that we as a community sometimes tend to forget about because we live in a predominantly white community where we don't have these acute racial problems that are in our face all the time. But they are there. I've seen them, our constituents have talked to us about it. It is built into the system and unfortunately our community has that problem in different ways and at different times. And it can be the most vulnerable people in the community whether it's mental health and homelessness or substance abuse It could be people who are poor and or juveniles and youth, whoever the vulnerable people are in the community tend to have experiences with law enforcement that are negative. Partly because the training that law enforcement receives and the tools that they're given our predominantly engaging a anti-violence type of crime situation that we don't see a lot here.

And what we're hearing from our constituents, and there's a little bit of common sense in this is that we have asked the police force to do way more than what its specific training is. And now we are looking at it and realizing that their relationships and their experiences in these different Types of law enforcement that we put under the umbrella, they don't work real well with that training. They don't work real well with that ideology.

The money we spend every month on transportation costs for police vehicles that are tanks designed to stop things that just frankly aren't... Don't happen here very often or all the tools on the tool belt of an officer that are designed to be able to stop someone who's committing violence. It's not that they're never needed it's just that we have to look at is there a better more efficient way? And that's the long version of defunding the police.

Is there a better way for us to look at how we've done this forever? And frankly, we already defunded mental health. We already defunded substance abuse in a lot of ways. Now I'm going to give credit where it's due. Our county is not 100 years backwards some other places in the country and some other communities and counties that aren't as progressive. Our Sheriff's Department, I've talked with Sheriff Ayoub personally. For those in the public that don't know all the council members here were on other boards throughout the county. One of those is the Ventura Council of Governments. Sheriff Ayoub has spoken there. I talked to him and you know the county is trying to move forward in different ways to deal with homelessness where it's not a always going to jail situation and forcing someone to pay bail and then they end up out and not charged and it's a very costly inefficient system.

It's Homelessness is not a crime under California law anymore, and they're not supposed to necessarily go to jail. So these ideas are opening up a little bit, but it's also a time to help move those things forward that we've grown a little bit in and grow a lot. And listening to everyone is obviously step one I think. Randy, I thought you made a great comment about that, that as we sit back and listen, it's clear that our constituents feel this way too.

Not only do we not have the money to afford this anymore, but we frankly shouldn't be paying this much for a long time. And the combination of the situation in society, the economic situation and our contract force us in a situation where we cannot accept no foreign answer on this renegotiation. The contract is older than I am. The terms in it are so archaic and built in a time and we get a monthly bill that we essentially rubber stamp and has been going on for four decades And how those costs vary each month, how the overtime works, how the transportation costs work.

As Mr. Weirich and I have dug into this there are a litany of issues in our contract. The sheriff's offices in Ojai that we paid for a long time ago. There's lots of different angles of attack but ultimately We need to settle on the idea that we're not taking no for an answer and this needs to get reworked. The amount we're paying per capita more than the next closest city in our county, which is Camarillo if we were to pay the same amount per capita then it would save us over a million dollars a year.

That's a lot of money, that's 10% of our city budget. That is a significant portion so we are undoubtedly going to push as hard as we can with the Sheriff's Department and that process has started. We're gonna do everything we can to bring them to the table understanding that we don't have any choice but to renegotiate this but there's a lot more reasons than just what's going on this moment on why we need it to change.

I, you know Marcia K. I want to give her some credit mental health issues in this community probably six or seven years ago she started working on it with local police they've been really responsive to it and it has helped in Ohio it's gotten better a lot of people don't necessarily see this in my line of work being lawyer I see it probably a little bit more so I don't want to say that this is all doom and gloom and that We're here, angry at our police department because this is not an issue of them not performing well. This is not an issue of some situation that occurred. We're lucky not to have that situation being the reason we're bringing up this conversation. But it doesn't mean we can't do better. And it doesn't mean that there aren't things to review.

So our commitment on this is, that's where we're at right now. If we're not going to have the Sheriff's Department open the door and welcome us in to talk about it, we'll keep knocking outside till they let us in and we'll kick the door down if we need to. We're trying to get as far into that meeting as we can so we can have a real legitimate discussion that is very complicated. But I really appreciate it as somebody who's looked at this a long time and has a lot of different opinions on ways we could tweak things that aren't necessarily anti-police, but are about more reviewing where we've gone over a long time and how we can do it better. And I appreciate everybody else looking at it as well.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:53:01

Okay, thank you Ryan. Is there anything that you Ryan or Bill want from the council in the way of direction? So now perhaps people in order to get the conversation started.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:53:16

I know Randy had something first, I don't know if

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:19

you wanna- Thank you Ryan and Mayor there's two things going on here and it's real clear. It is cleared by the public comments and it's cleared by every council person that has spoken. The two issues that are before us is one the cost of service That's in everything I read today regarding the past contract, the 2012. I don't even know if that was a grand jury report. It seemed like it was an audit called out by the county supervisors but wherever it was, I read that entire thing. But two things come out to me. One is what it costs for services and what the community is asking is what are the services?

And who is going to define the services, what we're paying for today and what do the services look like in the future. So this is so my input to Ryan into bill would be you need to define you need to separate those two points. And you need to go at them in two different manners. Because everything and every contract that I read, it's about billable hours based on a police officer, a sergeant, a supervisor, an investigator. When I was looking into what were the services provided?

General law enforcement investigation, traffic law enforcement patrol. There's no human element in that, and that's what everyone is talking about. That's what this Black Lives Matter is about today. It's about the human element. My direction to them would be twofold. One, break those two apart and actually start a discussion on what services are and what we're gonna pay for those services. And forget about this thing about one police officer, two police officers, three police officers. This is the defining moment and we need to define those parameters. And more importantly I think we need to be a group of five Because if we don't get a commitment from the other four cities, we'll be picked off one by one just like we were in the animal shelter discussion.

We need to be unified and we need to be unified in setting aside these two specific needs. Thank you

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:55:44

Okay, so anyway there were two things I was going to ask. One was and i'm going to come back to it and ask if there's a motion but before we go to that Randy has expressed what he'd like to see coming from the committee does the committee feel they need more direction or do they think they've got a pretty good idea how to get started on this? So that we can expect when you come back in September uh that we'll have a Fairly transparent discussion of the two things that Randy has spoken out. How did they arrive at the cost? How much are we paying for and what are we getting for

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated1:56:17

it?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:56:19

I don't hear anything

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:56:21

back from the committee. Yeah, Mayor? Yes. Bill here, Bill Waring. No, I think that's what I'm hearing and that's what I would be looking for is one not only that we start reaching out to other cities As Randy has talked about, but we also stay informed amongst ourselves. And we're entering into an extended period here where I think the council direction to us, Ryan and I is to keep pressing. We've met with the chief and made it clear to the chief that we need to move to their negotiating authority people in the Sheriff's Department. And we're not taking no for an answer.

But my only question is given Brown Act situation, what's going to be the best way of keeping everyone informed in terms of how things are going and what kind of information Ryan and I need to be sharing with the rest of the council in this long period of no meeting that we're about to enter into? That's why I'm a little concerned about that because we've got to all be hanging together in solidarity on this matter.

Ryan, I mean Matthew can you give me some opinion about how we can keep people informed?

1:57 – 2:1628 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:57:36

So depending on the subject there are portions of this conversation that are with legitimately within the attorney's high privilege. I can send a memorandum to the council that's kept privileged. It provides council one way update, it would be information to counsel can't be voting by email back because we could never vote by email. Second would be depending on the issue of public updates the city manager could send an email to Council that will be subject to public record. and would be the same information could go out to the public. That might be more useful for example when we get analysis from the Sheriff's Department of what they're charging and what for our negotiating position uh would perhaps be better suited for an interim client privilege assessment but depending on there are ways to get

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:58:18

it to council. So actual sensitive points about negotiation would be subject to a closed session uh for certain types of subject matter? Certain

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:58:27

portions of the conversation

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:58:29

Right. Not all of it, of course. And then if we felt like we got far enough down the road with the Sheriff's Department to talk about specific drafts of new versions of contract I would certainly you know I think that should be subject to some sort of public hearing I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:58:48

would expect that there'd be, I'll refer to the council and the mayor on how to structure it. But I would expect we would have probably a workshop where we project if it's well by Zoom put on the screen or if it's in person, if the pandemic has progressed enough by then, we hope or been not progressed but situations improved projected up on the wall and have a discussion

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction1:59:09

about it term-by-term. Right so get at workshops and our maybe even closed sessions in this interim period depending on what happens okay? Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role1:59:19

And the pandemic has in fact really made this extraordinarily difficult, particularly on the two members of the committee because this is kind of an eyeball to eyeball sort of face-to-face type of conversation with somebody whoever's on the other side of the door. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:59:40

I just want to say what I think and this is subject to whatever the council feels but I don't think our best foot forward is to start with organizing with other communities. I think our best foot forward first is to have a conversation about all these unique problems and see where we are, and that's to see where that process is because once we get folded into everybody else some of these really awkward specific things that are Ojai related disappear like the fact that we negotiated a very inexpensive lease agreement with the police department to be able to use the building in order to keep our rates low, but that has never been recalculated to give us any additional benefit later on. The 4.3 square miles with one square mile being all golf course and the per capita not only population number but the size of the jurisdiction number that's actually covered is significantly different so it's hard if we get You know, I would love to do both at the same time.

We just don't think we can. So what I'm hoping is that we can have a direct meeting with the appropriate people at the Sheriff's Office who we can talk to about these specific Ojai things with the idea being we want some relief done Custom tailored for us. And if that's not going to work, then they're going to be made well aware that we will communicate with other communities and join together as is necessary and look at things on a collective basis, but none of the other communities are calling us either Camry was doing this on their own right now. We're more than welcome to find a way to kind of make sure we're all in it together. But in our research and looking at this, there's so many specific things to Ojai I'm just a little concerned if we jump in with everybody else do those get lost or not?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:01:23

Yeah, I would agree with you Ryan and I think that the reason for a subcommittee is for you and Bill yeah, you know certain things or think you know certain things as we all do But when you sit down and talk with the sheriff's office and the county people to find out what's real, what are the non-negotiables? What are the alternatives that we're all going to be faced with. And then we can come back and sit down and have that public conversation of what are our choices. So do we have a motion out there Randy did you wanna make a motion on?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:01:58

I just wanted to, I'm sorry Sousa. I think Sousa would like to speak and then I'll speak after her. Okay Sousa?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:02:06

It's a practical immediate question Um, the homeless shelters are now closed. I want to make sure that it's legal for a homeless person to sleep outside and if i'm not mistaken there's a sign behind City Hall that prohibit this prohibit maybe the city manager can clarify does it prohibit people sleeping on our property behind City Hall? And can people legally sleep in the park if they're not drinking or doing any graffiti or any criminal activity? We

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:02:43

really wanted to have this on the fly. Why don't you have that conversation

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:02:48

with because it's an immediate concern, I want to make sure our restrooms are still open and I want to make sure that the homeless are not being ticketed.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:02:59

Right. Okay, so have that conversation with the city manager and the chief you can do that in the morning. You know I'd be sure that it's being addressed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:03:08

I think the public would like to know isn't it is a if it's isn't a simple yes or no question.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:03:16

The restrooms are still open I believe and they are being hopefully cleaned. But are we really advertising that we want people to come and sleep in our parks?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:03:26

Well, I thought about that. And I doubt that any of the homeless are watching this Zoom meeting. So I, you know...

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:03:34

Well, okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:03:36

I tried. The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. If you'll permit me, I'd love to send an email to the council that could be made public with the precise answer to that question. Tomorrow, thank you. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:03:51

The part of that if I can quickly the easy part to answer is we are keeping the bathrooms and amenities available so that everybody can stay clean during this pandemic. So we will continue to do that at this time.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:04:05

Okay Ryan or not Ryan Randy, the other R. I'm Randy F

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:04:09

tonight. There's no need to argue tonight and I'm not trying to argue. I believe what Bill and Ryan are doing is difficult, and I believe that they're putting their best effort in their best foot forward. So I do agree that going at this as an individual entity, our city in a discussion with the county, I think is appropriate. I do say though and I do firmly believe this that there is power in numbers.

And that if we set a base of what realistic service Requirements are, and Ojai is the base as the smallest city within this 10-city county community. I'm thinking that That base becomes the template. And now as the other cities and their uniqueness create and develop their needs, that now other cities like us can look at those and say yeah we would like that service or we would like that service. I'm just all i'm trying to say when it comes to that Bill and Ryan is think about identifying clearly what the services are paying for So that we can then actually come back to council and have that discussion, just like five years into the ATP discussion at the last council meeting. We finally got a breakdown of costs of services.

I think that's what the community is asking So again, Mayor I'm just trying to say that. That I think what they're doing is appropriate starting out as a single entity but I do think that if we don't come together. If I was the county and I had to choose between losing one or losing five, what would I want to negotiate with? I don't wanna lose five. But I may tell a little Ojai, you know what? You're on your own.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:06:18

It's all good. Yeah, you indicate that the county will care if they lose something. We have to be very careful as we approach this because every city, and Bill likes to talk about sovereignty, each sovereign city to the degree they have sovereignty will have a little different thing that they want to buy and can afford off of the menu that the county is gonna offer. The county will have a menu. They do right now, it's just they haven't kept their menu up to date. And they've also said that they only will sell in large lots and we don't want a case of them. We want something less than the case but we've got to have that conversation so that Bill and Ryan have a really good understanding of what the choices are. And then we can talk amongst ourselves as to how we want to go forward because yeah, we started out with our own police department It's a very expensive thing to have your own police department, and it's fraught with all sorts of problems.

But if you can't afford to buy your services from someplace else, maybe you get forced back into that. We are really too small to do those kinds of things. So what we wanna do I think is to understand what's available out there, be reasonable but understand that there is a price. And right now we're being told according to what Bill's been informed That there is a minimum purchase that has been allowed. I think that needs to be reexamined, but we're the smallest city so we may be the only one with that problem. So anyway, did you have emotional beyond that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:07:54

Well, I don't know if the discussion called for a motion tonight other than to allow Bill and Ryan to proceed. But if there was a motion that I wanted to make tonight it would be for staff to write a resolution based on Black Lives Matter and based on the statement I made regarding intolerance and racism. And I'd like to see that brought to council back in September if I can get a second.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:08:22

Okay, so we have a motion and a second. This would be something similar to what the city of Camarillo is already engaging in. So we, okay. Discussion on that? Are we ready for a vote on that? Okay, not hearing any discussion I guess all those in favor say aye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:08:43

Aye.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:08:43

Aye, anybody opposed? Okay, James talk with our friends down in Camarillo and let's see what we can come back with. Okay next topic where are we on the agenda? We are on the emergency response and update James.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:09:03

Thank you and I have a brief presentation some updated information one second Okay, looks like it's working. So we wanted to just give a brief update. Are you getting the reverb here? Let's see. We wanted to give a brief update on the... Now. Okay, all right. Part of the technical difficulty. We wanted to give a brief update on the coronavirus response and the latest happenings there's obviously been some big news over the last couple days and we wanted to update the public on it.

We wanted to start by just kind of going over, we've kind of updated these charts every month to give people an idea of how the statistics are progressing with the coronavirus. We've shown this before but back at the end of May we had 912 total cases in Ventura County with six cases in the 93023 zip code which includes the city but also some areas outside of the city 23 hospitalized patients, 13 in the ICU and 30 deaths at that time. And at that time we had 22,685 people tested and 4.1% of those tested had tested positive.

And then, so we updated that about a month afterwards and about a month ago. And you can see there were over 2,000 cases at that point, 14 cases in the 93023 zip code. Now one note with that is that's 14 cases total not 14 cases active at one time but it had been 14 cases total. 51 hospitalized, 14 in the ICU and 43 deaths. At that time there was 50,000 tested so a big increase in those tested but not much of an increase in those that tested positive with it going to 4.25%.

And today, again a little less than a month from now. We'll see what everybody is seeing statewide which is a jump in total cases the county has up now has over 4600 cases with 369 cases added yesterday. Again total cases in the 93023 since the beginning of this pandemic are 29 cases And if you review the statistics by area, the 93023 zip code is one of the lowest rates per thousand people that any area is seeing in Ventura County. I think it is the lowest rate actually and which we appreciate everybody making the effort wearing face coverings and social distancing to continue that trend hopefully.

Currently there are 98 hospitalized, 29 in the ICU and there have been 53 deaths. Big jump in the number of tested from 50,000 to 78,000 and one of the things to watch is that The number of those who tested positive has increased to about 5.86%. Across the country, across the state we're hearing that there's a surge and that seems to bear out locally although Ventura County is doing well compared to most of our immediate neighbors.

Last meeting we went through the timeline of over the last couple months it seems like every week we have new orders, new openings, new closings and we had noted at that time that we were hoping that it was the last order for a while. It was allowing nail salons, massage parlors and other shops to reopen And unfortunately, with yesterday the state and the State of California announced new restrictions. So we will have new restrictions to announce. We'll be putting a video out tomorrow announcing the county order more clearly but for now the state has announced that effective yesterday all counties must close the indoor operations of dine-in restaurants Wineries and tasting rooms, movie theaters, family entertainment centers, zoos and museums, and card rooms.

Additionally they noted that bars, brew pubs, breweries, and pubs must close unless they offer outdoor dine-in meals. And so that's all counties statewide And then additionally, the state announced that counties that have been on the monitoring list for three consecutive days which unfortunately does include Ventura County are required to shut down some additional Businesses including for indoor use at least the businesses can continue for outsider pickup services but it includes fitness centers worship services protests offices for non-essential sectors personal care services.

Hair salons and barbershops and malls. And we are currently waiting, I thought it had come in while we were talking earlier but it does not appear to be that. We're waiting for the updated Ventura County order that will have more specificity but at this time that is the state's order. As a reminder the county of Ventura can get more strict than the state but can't be less strict And for the city of Ojai, same thing. We can be more strict than either the state or the county but we can't be less strict so what the state has said will be the floor of you know what they've said has to close will have to close and the county, we expect it to be relatively in line with the state but they may have some additional orders although we don't expect that.

But we should know more by tomorrow morning. We wanted to just note quickly that the testing capacity continues to expand. We all know that testing's been a challenge since day one for this, and we continue to roll out more testing countywide. The three drive-through testing locations that have been announced are the Ford dealership in Santa Paula, Oxnard College in Oxnard, Ventura College in Ventura with specific days here And the antibody testing is still being offered at the Oxnard Fire Department as part of a study with information on oxnard.org, and recently the city in the Ojai School District reached out to the county and offered locations for testing sites The challenge with getting testing sites as we talked to the county about it is that the resources are still a challenge, although they're making progress.

So we had a good discussion with the county and the county noted that they would look at those locations as a potential future site so we're going to keep advocating for that in the Ojai Valley.

2:16 – 2:232 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:16:41

James yes real quick did the county have a two or three roving testing vehicles or monitoring stations that they were sending around to different communities? We don't necessarily need one full time in Ojai, but it sure be nice to be in the loop. Maybe once we set up a site that would just help our community.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:17:04

Yeah, we talked about that too. We talked about even if it's just a couple days a week and I think they saw the demand when they had the antibody testing for that for the one day in the Ojai Valley. I think that was last week, but it might have been two weeks ago and they I think they saw the demand. A line around the block essentially to get tested. So when we spoke to them, to the county recently they were very receptive and asked us to submit a list of locations so we're hoping that's a good sign here and we'll keep on it.

We wanted to remind people of the existing executive orders in place. This has gone on for over three months now, actually I think we just hit four months, four months and a day since we declared an emergency. And so some of the things we've announced early on that didn't affect people were hearing that we're getting more questions about them so we wanted to remind everybody of some things that are going on For example, we've had people ask if the city has a eviction moratorium in place because people that hadn't been affected are now affected and weren't aware. So we wanted to remind everyone that there is an existing residential and commercial eviction moratorium in place in the City of Ojai. And that information can be found on the coronavirus link on the city's website.

The copy of the executive order that gives information on that The city's face covering requirement from April has been replaced by the state's, but the face covering requirements still in place which is why we still have the signs at the entrance to town reminding people to wear face coverings and all businesses. And I think even more importantly now with yesterday's order.

Closing indoor businesses again is that the city still has an order that allows outdoor seating areas at restaurants either to be established or expanded. And we encourage restaurants and businesses that would like to utilize that service to contact us at extension 112 here at our phone number 805-646-5581 I think we still have nine, or I think we may have just issued the 10th outdoor dining permit.

But there are some businesses who were waiting to see if things were going to open up again so I think with that news yesterday we're encouraging people to contact us as soon as they would like to do that. And then lastly, similarly with fitness facilities closing indoor operation. We've had a few takers recently on our order that allows fitness instructors to reserve park space for a reduced fee to hold classes and if there is a fitness instructor who was on the fence on that before they may want to call us now at our extension 306 here And we can work with them to get that going. I think we had been hearing from a lot of businesses that they were going to wait and see how it played out before changing their whole business plan, and unfortunately with yesterday, you know, we want to just remind people that they have these options although we understand it's difficult and challenging for everyone.

So, we have the order in place. The state has a face covering requirement and lastly we wanted to announce a couple of hot topics on questions we've been hearing and things we're hearing. We've heard that there's an increase in scams related to the coronavirus countywide. Particularly calls from alleged contact tracers who ask for personal information like a social security number or who asked for a payment to perform the service. Those count the county is performing contact tracing they will not charge fees and will not ask for fees and they will not ask for social security numbers so if you hear about if you get a call from one of those there they shouldn't be asking for that information if they're legitimate We also had heard that there's some fraudulent housing opportunities being presented where people are calling and claiming to be unable to meet due to coronavirus, and they offer to mail the keys.

That's an alarm bell for residents to be aware of. And then we're also hearing about fraudulent coronavirus testing opportunities, apparently where they are trying to charge a fee and you send something in to get tested. There is no current system for that so we remind everybody to visit vhca.org for the official testing opportunities in Ventura County Then lastly, the question that's come up recently including this weekend is we get a lot of questions about whether team sports are allowed.

I think there was a practice from what I heard but I believe it was outside city limits or a team practice. Team sports are currently not allowed. So, you know football, baseball, soccer those sports where there's contact. We're placing additional signage at the parks this weekend to remind residents and discourage large gatherings. Non-contact sports, non-contact individual sports are permissible at this point or permitted by the county So things like tai chi, yoga and some of those types of activities are permitted. So we're working to get those in our outdoor exercise program as we can but the apparently this weekend there were a lot of issues I think another city had A couple hundred people from LA show up to play softball because it's not allowed in LA and we, Ventura County has noted that it's not allowed in Ventura County either at this time.

So with that that's the latest update on the coronavirus emergency which continues and we are continuing to try to respond to it.

2:23 – 2:3634 turns

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:23:40

Are there any questions of the City Manager?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:23:47

James is it factual to say that people are still free with proper physical distancing and face covering to patronize retail establishments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:24:01

Yes, for retail inside is still permitted. Restaurants and...

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:24:09

I'm just talking retail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:24:11

Yeah so retail is still permitted.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:24:12

You want to buy a pair of buy-a-shirt-it-rains or get a kitchen implement or something? Correct. We're fine with physical distancing and face covering? Is that correct? Okay

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:24:23

thank you. Was there another question out there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:24:27

Mayor I just wanted to, I know that you know Bill and I and James are going to be meeting on Thursday with the business community but you know i received quite a few phone calls this week. And businesses in Ojai are hurting most of them their revenues are down anywhere from 60 to 70 percent and with this latest shutdown um I'm sad to say this but I think we're gonna see more businesses going out of business And um it's just sad. It's just really sad to to have a conversation with the business owner and not be able to do anything, not being able to you know I mean you want to reach through the phone or whatever you can do and give them a hug or just let them know that you feel sorry for their pain but it's sad and it's going to get worse.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:25:17

Everyone please shop if you can your local business right

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:25:23

Okay, we're on item number four. Modification of the structure of the commissions. Is there any introductory remarks from the staff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:25:35

Yeah just very brief if I may, thank you. So one note is we wrote this the recommendation says to adopt the ordinance but we actually jumped the gun a little bit it's to introduce and have the first reading of the ordinance so it'd have to come back for adoption. This is the introduction first reading of the ordinance to modify the structure of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Parks and Rec Commission The City Council had reviewed those, the commissions and committees and had requested that staff return with a ordinance that would reduce the size of each of those commissions from seven to five which they currently have.

Would allow each council member to appoint a commissioner, just like the Planning Commission has been modified to proceed and we saw earlier today. And so that ordinance has been brought back. I think last time we brought the item for discussion, we were asked to get the feedback from the commissions on the changes. The Historic Preservation Commission discussed at their most recent meeting and stated that they prefer seven to five.

And then the Parks and Rec Commission discussed at their last meeting Supported the move from seven. They supported five members plus one non-voting youth member, although I should say so they actually said that they were a little torn on whether it should be five plus the one non-voting youth member or if it should be five including the non voting youth member we had recommended five members plus one non-voting youth member. So they just they said you know that they would Follow council's lead on that, whichever way council decides.

And so with that, that's the feedback from the commissions.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:27:37

OK, well I'll offer a motion to approve the first reading. Is there a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:27:43

Second.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:27:46

OK. Moved and seconded. Now we'll take discussion. Susan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:27:50

OK, I request that your motion just be for the Park and Rec Commission. That we have a separate discussion concerning the Historical Preservation Commission. You're

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:28:06

moving to amend the motion? Yes. Is there a second to the motion to amend? Okay, now Jerry and Annie the motion will stand as it is.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:28:21

I feel like this is being railroaded. I remember clearly at the last meeting when this was before us that I was assured that this was not...I was really surprised to see this because I was never in favor of reducing the Historical Preservation Commission to five members. Yes, but I would like the opportunity to read. We had seven comments from longtime former and present historical commissions explaining why they want to remain a seven-member commission. I feel that this is very disrespectful of their wishes and their volunteer time not to at least Consider why they want to remain a seven member commission. I would also like to understand why council is so keen to make it a five member commission because the logic that there's five of us and we each pick one, that alone is not justification for reducing the commission to five members in my opinion.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:29:35

Right, you are entitled to that opinion, I would agree with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:29:39

So I would like to, first of all, I'd like you to know if this council listened to the discussion that the Historical Commission had at the end of their meeting. I listened to it and then I discussed it with two of the longtime commissioners and I want assurance that you read the email from Craig Walker and Brian Akins. There are seven emails lengthy emails Explaining why they want I just, I need to know from each one of you that you had the courtesy. To read these emails these comments and then your decision stands based on new information but maybe new information.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:30:25

We've actually heard those even testified before the council over the years plus we got the email so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:30:33

I would like to at least read Craig Walker's comment, because he is one of the longtime Ojai historians. Go ahead and read it please. To the Ojai City Council, I am opposed to tonight's proposal to reduce the number of Historic Preservation Commission members from seven to five. The Commission itself strongly favors keeping the number at seven. If they see the benefit of a larger commission, why reduce it? They all serve as volunteers and any additional costs are certainly measurable. When I served on the Commission, I felt that seven members was an optimal size for meaningful discussions. If one or two wouldn't attend there were still enough to carry on. A quorum of three is too small on most items. And we see this problem now with the Planning Commission, we've had numerous meetings only three planning commissioners present.

In evaluating the second point, Craig Walker is in evaluating the historic significance of property and the impacts on them more viewpoints are usually helpful. The commission has also recently formed some subcommittees which are easier to fill when drawing from a larger Commission A seven member commission allows for more members who live outside the city limits. Some of the town's most historic structures were donated to the people of the Ojai Valley, that's in quotes and are now located within the city. This is true for all of Mr. Libby's gifts and probably for others as well. Those who have studied Ojai's history often don't live inside the city limits. Additionally, the City Historic Ordinance was written to include structures in the city sphere of influence with county agreement, a balance of four city residents and three county residents has worked well for many years and should be continued.

I see that the level of work that the Historic Commission has is equal to that of the Arts Commission. If the Arts Commission is allowed to remain a seven-member commission, I feel that there's ample justification to consider allowing the Historic Preservation Commission to remain a seven-member commission. Thank you.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:33:03

OK. You're welcome. Other comments? Mayor? Yes, Bill.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:33:09

Susan, for the record I did watch the discussion at the Historic Preservation Commission. I've spoken with Brian about this and I did read all the emails and I just want to say my position is still that one of the key differences for the historic commission is that the role it plays in permitting and being part of the entitlement process I think that the idea, I think this is a consequence of good governance with having a rotating nomination procedure and it's with the advent of districting.

And even without the district thing, I think it makes sense because I think it builds a close relationship between the commission and the members of the council and gives the council all equal participation in the nomination process And I also think it improves the efficiency and efficacy and more efficient use of staff time to have the five structured in this way. So, I listened to you very carefully. I wanted to out of respect be clear on what my thinking is.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:34:31

May I respond Mayor?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:34:34

Well, it's not a debate right now. Are there other comments from the council? Okay. Go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:34:43

ahead. Bill you know what you said very well but when I think about it doesn't really make sense because even though we are in a particular district which may change next year our selection of the commissioners is at large Yes, I don't really understand what that has anything to do with it. And I just don't follow your logic in this case usually I do. For

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:35:12

clarification

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:35:13

Bill would

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:35:14

you like to clarify? Well yeah the idea is I think the real important reform here is that's a good thing is the rotating nomination because You know, previously we've had just all nominations are in the hands of the mayor. And I think it's good to rotate that nomination process and this works a lot better with five in that respect.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:35:39

There's no reason why we couldn't figure out how to do that with

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:35:42

seven. We have to disagree, Susan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:35:45

Yeah.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:35:45

Right. OK. Are there any other comments? This requires a roll call, Matt. Yes, it does as an ordinance. Will the clerk please call the roll?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1
Show transcript
Mayor Pro Tem Blatz? Yes. Council Member Francina? No. Council Member Haney? Yes Council Member Wyrick? Yes Mayor Johnston? Yes

Motion passed. The next topic is the community organization funding for fiscal year 2021 city manager.

2:36 – 2:4719 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:36:24

Thank you and we recently adopted the budget at the last council meeting we had. And in that budget it included $35,000 for in the Arts Commission funding line item and $114,200 in community organization funding line item. At that time we noted that those were the line items, but we did not designate or recommend funding for any particular community group. And so it was requested to come back at this meeting to allow Council to discuss which groups would receive funding and in what amounts.

The Arts Commission has requested $35,000 in funding. The Ojai Valley Museum has requested $60,000 in funding and the Chamber of Commerce has requested 51,000 and funding for the first six months of this fiscal year. No additional requests have been received so we are bringing those back to council to determine which to fund.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:37:27

Okay thank you well in light of you know the hiring freezes The elimination of positions and the deficit, I would hope that we would stay within this amount. It's probably more than we can afford over time. The idea of giving funding for six months is fine but that should be the annual allocation. The other six months will have to be funded somewhere else in my view. But does anybody have a motion they'd like to offer?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:38:01

Well, I'll offer a motion there if that's okay. Bill with the recommendation of $35,000 for the art commission, $60,000 for the Ojai Valley Museum and $51,000 for six months with the Ohio Chamber of

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:38:15

Commerce.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:38:17

That leaves a little contingency.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:38:20

Okay Randy?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:38:22

I'll second that.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:38:23

Okay it's moved and seconded discussion. Six month thing could be either explained or eliminated so that the, in this case it's the chamber but anybody receiving funding from the city. That sort of implies that there'll be another six months and we have no idea where we're going to be in six months. But we do have some idea and it's not gonna be good. I think that we give them what we feel we can afford now and we reevaluate. And if things get better, then great, we'll give them more.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:39:02

But

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:39:02

not guaranteed?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:39:05

No expectation at this point. Mayor, I agree with you a hundred percent. If anything it's an opportunity instead of giving a lump sum for a year that we're actually regulating it to six months and we'll see how our finances are. And I would agree if right now they're dim but then they could be dimmer. And if that's the case then we obviously know what we're gonna do in six months.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:39:30

Okay other discussion? So we have a motion and a second. It involves money, so I guess we have a roll call. Gail or James? Who's calling the roll?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:46

I will.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:39:47

Okay.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1 motion and a second. It involves money, so I guess we have a roll call.
Show transcript
Council Member Haney? Yes. Council Member Francina? Yes Mayor Johnston? No. Mayor Pro Tem Blatz? Yes Council Member Weyrich? Yes

Okay, motion passes We go to the next topic, Memorandum of Understanding for Development of a Climate Park. I think this was at the request of at least what two council people? Yeah Bill and Brian okay who wants to explain what this is about it seems somewhat of a rush but I see Bill's smiling face. Are you going to take the lead on

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:40:36

this? I could. James, did you want to summarize? You had a little bit of a staff discussion here. There is one word added, clarification.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:40:46

Yeah, I'll clarify that. So yeah, so what we have before us for this item is a potential MOU. We wanted to clarify that the MOU would be for development of the proposal from Global Green. It's not yet, you know it's not the build portion of the project yet it's still the design and the proposal so we wanted to clarify that because I think the report I've heard I understand that some people were confused by that For to develop a design and proposal with Global Green for a climate park in Ojai. And with that, I'll turn it over to Council Member Wyrick and Blatz.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:41:33

Ryan do you want me to start out or? Go ahead Bill. Okay. What we're seeing here and I think the reason for action tonight is the long hiatus before we have another meeting. And the fact that we have We have a lead person, and it's not just a name. It is a global organization that wants to identify Ojai in a relationship for the first concept development of a climate park in the entire United States.

It's one of these things which they are attracted to our characteristics. We have a unique opportunity behind City Hall between the grant that was received, magnificently applied for and received on the invasive species. We have the in-stream flow grant that complements that and this only leverages it potentially further into something that would have implications in a positive sense, not just for the city but for the entire community.

We had a conference call about this and it was really fascinating because what they're really looking for is just a memorandum of understanding their They're looking at potential for sister city relationships that could attract resources, or sustainability educational participations. Looking at soils, topography predisposition for all kinds of environmental improvement. A lot of expertise really on a global level that could help with the kind of policy goals that we are very ambitious about embracing and sometimes with limited resources. And this is a way of getting more resources without budget expenditures. So Brian, did you hope I summarized more or less accurately?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:44:01

Yeah, thank you Bill. Look, this is an interesting opportunity that we have in Ojai. Right now we have no money. We have no positive projects in the works. We have very little we can do that's inspirational that fits into the character and mantra that is Ojai yet from a very confluence of very lucky things at the same time during all these very unlucky things that are going on. We have a very solid amount of grant money that can dovetail really well with an organization that we ended up getting in contact kind of by happenstance, really through Jamie Fleming's efforts at The Chamber and we have a unbelievably world-class organization and a top tier expert in the field Who we have a chance to take what is the property behind city hall and allow them as it being their canvas for Bjorn and his art, and his art is climate.

His art is the Kind of integrating an entire kind of small ecosystem. It's hard to explain, but it's really interesting and it's very appropriate for Ojai. And here we have an opportunity to take something that we're already going to be working on Probably cleaned up a little bit, and at the same time where we have no funding to be able to contribute to it. We have an interested party who says hey if you'll give us the canvas and work with us will raise the money and will do everything we need to be really good partners. And that's why we're starting with an MOU, and we're gonna keep working on this until we get somewhere down the road to have some sort of design agreement that will come back to the council and move forward with.

And really at this point what Global Green needs is us to show our support for them doing what they wanna do which is really taking this by the reins and raising money to be able to get this thing working. And I gotta say there's not a lot to be excited about Right now because of the COVID situation and the economics, this is something to be really excited about.

And I don't think we should overthink it. I think we should get this MOU signed, keep this process moving forward and bring it back to the council as is needed and get the groups that are going to be involved in the grant all working together With global green so that there's just going to be a really amazing amount of effort that's going on, on what we're calling the city hall campus and what can be done with that really the back area where the river kind of goes down and there's that beautiful stream.

This is, I know Bill is too. We're both really passionate about this and this is something that we can all rally behind as something positive during a time where it may be awhile before we have anything really positive to rally around the town. So we're hoping that everybody's in agreement to take this next step. And since we're gonna be on hiatus for awhile, we wanted to get this done now and really so they can hold up a piece of paper and say hey, we have the support of Ojai so they can start doing their job to raise some money.

2:47 – 2:5822 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:22

Mayor?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:47:23

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:24

Randy. I'll probably be the one of the dissenters tonight regarding this but Carnegie Mellon came to Ojai and it took us almost three years to get an MOU with them. And here we have a company and i don't know if any of you went to their website and looked at them. I don't know if anyone in the public has but I did The thing that scared me the most about them is how affluent they are.

And with affluency comes gentrification. And my fear is, is that this group is tied to a lot of wealthy money people and Ojai has a brand. And that these people want to take our brand and make something. I don't know, because there's no clear definition of what they're going to do. There's no, what are we giving them? Are we giving them the stream or are we giving them the south side of the mountain? Are we giving them the acreage right behind? Are they in conflict with the memorial garden? We have nothing here that clearly defines what they're gonna do. How they're gonna do when they're going to do and what's the benefit from us but they should receive a benefit right off the get go by saying we are branded with Ojai.

And that's my fear here, is we know nothing about them. They have not come to us and talked to council. They haven't talked to us individually. They haven't come and done a presentation but I'll tell you what go to their website just go take a peek $250,000 plate dinners, $100,000 plate dinners it's fundraising like that then I'll be honest with you scares the daylights out of me because that's not what we are And we are gonna allow someone or something or an entity like that to come into our neighborhood, embed themselves in our backyard.

And I don't know if that's in our best interest. Now, that's one side of it. Do I agree that climate change is obviously something that we should be working for and that we should be doing as much as we can to mitigate and figure out good practices to do that? 100% behind that. I'm just not sure if this is the deal. And I'm not sure if rushing to an MOU with this group is in the benefit of the community. So while I'm On the fence, I would like more time to digest it. I'd like more time to meet with Global Green and then their project manager is Ryan. What did you say his name was?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:50:21

Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:50:21

does he

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:50:22

live here? He's a global citizen. When we talked to him and we were on conference call, he was in South Africa in the winter. They have their organization North American headquarters is in Los Angeles. And we're looking at providing a study area that's all we're looking into it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:50:51

Well like you said I'm straddling the fence because I need more information And from what I saw on their website, like I said it just scares the daylights out of me that all's I see is money and the need for money. In fact initially they wanted $100,000 from us first they came in and said we wanna do this then they came back and say well we need money God bless James because he held out and said no we don't have any money. We all said no and decided okay we'll go another path. I'm just saying that I think the community deserves more information Okay. That's my take on it.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:51:27

Yeah, I tend to agree with Randy. I'm not opposed to it. I think that obviously something like a quote climate park whatever that is. It says the first in the United States. Is it the first in the world or the second in the world? There are other locations and other countries Okay, do we know where they are? Normally when something like this happens they send you a brochure or pictures or something. And I tell you the thing that concerns me and it's not here so I don't agree with Randy. The money doesn't scare me. I'm delighted they got money and maybe they'll spend it here but what concerns me is I don' want us to burden the City Hall campus with yet another overlay. We've already got, you know, organic garden and memorial garden and pickleball plus our basic function.

And we're having difficulties with a very old lease with our friends at help of Ojai that I don't even see kind of a site plan. Mayor,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:27

I

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:52:27

had one more question please. There's also- Let me finish and then I'll come back. I didn't see anything here that said that they weren't overlaying the entire parcel or the parcels of city-owned land and they'll tell us later what they intend to design and do with it. I think that's kind of rushing it a bit. Does anybody, you know did we not put this in the brochure or the agenda because we hadn't received it? Or is there a place we can go to see this between now and when we approve this?

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:53:03

Randy. You want an answer, Johnny?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:53:07

Yeah there is an answer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:53:09

yeah. I mean the idea is we got to start somewhere and they want to be assured that they can start working on it and we want to be assured that we have given them the opportunity to start inquiring designing knowing that nothing can start with a shovel in the ground until there's a whole other round of approval But we wanted, this is what everybody involved said. This is what gets them enough to get started. This is what doesn't commit us to anything specific but says we are going in good faith to look at it and the scope of what they wanna do if it's not consistent with what we want then we're gonna have another round of talking about this. But what we're hoping is that in our discussions with them, which was once with everybody physically here in Ojai and then various conversations on Zoom and whatnot now.

Is that they want to feel confident that they are not going to get the rug pulled out from underneath them if they're going to put in the effort to try and raise some money. And Bjorn put together a design of what we're talking about, but he made it real clear to them that we don't know if we can approve anything until we see that. But we are, if this is approved willing to say hey, We're going to take a real hard look at it and try every way we can to try and make this work, but obviously not we were not committing to anything fully yet.

Their concern has been exactly what's going on right now. Is this something that the city is going to bait and switch them? They're not worried about funding, they're not worried about these other issues. They're saying look, this is such a good opportunity for what we wanna do and it's such a good mesh with the distance of this from LA and that Bjorn has been here physically and already met with us.

And he's willing to come out of South Africa to get this done on his own dime or money they can raise. That they really like the idea right now, especially under COVID situation that they have a project that's in their kind of extended backyard where this might work. So that's really what we're bringing. We're bringing the convenience, the opportunity and the land

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:55:22

and- I don't understand the MOU in my background and development. And what I see before our planning commission frequently is the person who's proposing something has a, invests a little bit in- A

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:55:39

concept review?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:55:41

Yeah, concept review as to what is the site and here's a picture or two of things that's been out to places. And then we'd like to make it site specific if you guys will agree that this generally is compatible now sign something like an MOU and say you got sort of a period of due diligence to come back Because it seems to me we're sort of leasing the property of sorts, and then there is a certain right they have to it. And then what are we going to do? Say no when they come back?

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:56:20

we've made it clear that if we have to say no and they come back, we could still say no. We don't want to. That's not where we're going and we don't want to send the message that we're going to be really...

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:56:30

Why can't we do it by you know something much simpler that just you know says for preliminary design uh then will get very serious consideration and believe it's compatible with the other things we do here?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction2:56:42

Well this is our restoration ecology that we're looking at doing. We're not looking at Providing an entitlement to any other agency to use city land. This isn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:56:53

them renting it out or this isn't them making money off it, or using

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role2:56:57

it. But what about the conflict with the other people who are already here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:57:03

We've discussed that significantly with them and we've made it really clear. In fact, the first conversation we had with everybody was to make sure everybody was on the same page The first meeting I had post talking about this on the very first minute was with James about ensuring that we could set a structure up that would work appropriately with different people on the property doing their work at the same time. And I've already talked to Brian Hawley at Pax Environmental and kind of briefed him about what this might look like if it came up, to at least just kind of set the table for him. We talked about what the relationship on the campus would be between James, Greg Grant, Jamie Fleming and anybody else who needed to be there. And we made it real clear with Global Green on how that would work saying we don't want to micromanage what you're going to do once we have kind of something voted on later but you do have to play well with others and everybody needs to make sure that the invasive species grant is working the way it needs to be and autonomous and that this needs to be autonomous but that everybody coordinates on some level together And we've, I mean, I think everybody has been informed and is well aware of that.

And as this is supposed to kind of review, discuss that a touch but we didn't want to get too specific. That's really in the next round when we really wanna kinda get into the nitty gritty and some of those other details. We're not, you know I don't believe Bill and I think that there's any part of this MOU that would prevent us from having the flexibility we need as a city later but it does give them enough certainty to move forward and start engaging on a broader scope of kind of building their background of the project and their fundraising in those types of things.

So Mayor

2:59 – 3:0833 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:01

Again, what I found interesting about the last comments I heard was six people know about this. That's what I just heard. Jamie, Bill, Ryan, the PACS individual and maybe one other person. Again this is something that should be vetted in the public arena. I see no reason why we can't wait a month and hold a public hearing. I'm lost on what the reason to expedite this is. That's why I'm lost there. The other thing is Ryan you and I already sit on a committee Regarding this site. Does that committee no longer exist? And because I see you and Bill appointed yourself to this committee, should we have that discussion as to who should be on this committee?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:59:49

So let me say this first. The reason we can't talk about this in a month is because we don't have a council meeting in a month because we're on recess which is why we said Bill and I were stuck in a position where we got notice from Jamie Fleming with 24 hours to go, and there was nothing we could do about it. And then once the two of us said hey, Jamie will try and get there tomorrow at like 11 o'clock in the park.

We could not do anything else because we were locked under the Brown Act. And you're saying why aren't we having a public hearing? We're having a public hearing, that's why we're having a public hearing right now

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:00:24

or not they're not here doing a presentation. We know nothing about this company.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:00:30

Guys, we're discussing it in public. That is true and we understand your reservations Randy. Susie you haven't had a chance I thought I heard your voice out there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:00:39

Yeah well first of all as you probably know I have reservations about the taking down the hundreds of trees. I need to investigate that aspect of it and those two things in some ways are not related and in other ways they are related but It says, I don't know how this gives them any more security than simply postponing this because it says termination and amendment. The last paragraph says global green and the city of Ojai may terminate this memorandum of understanding anytime by notifying the other party in writing Either by electronic means or by mail, Global Green of the City of Ojai may amend this memorandum of understanding at any time blah, blah, blah. So I want to know is this jeopardized if we take a little more time? We could even have a special meeting.

Can we walk the land? What happens if this is what are the repercussions if we postpone this?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:01:53

Okay, could I respond to that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:01:55

Mayor?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:01:56

Go Bill. So what I'm concerned about is that this again represents something of an unprecedented opportunity to leverage what we already have committed in this very special ecological zone And to be able to leverage it even more in terms of a restoration habitat, in terms of a restoration ecology and in a manner that would have benefits across service club involvement our educational system private and public the overall sustainability goals. It's a way of leveraging and what the MOU is What we risk not approving it tonight is basic, what they're looking for is does this council embrace the idea of saying we welcome you into our community and develop a concept for us to vet and look at.

We've already been around the bush on this thing. And if we wait until the end of summer, I really fear that it's like any kind of relationship they're gonna say well, we're gonna go elsewhere with this energy that they're offering to partner with us on right now. They wanna move forward. This is not a plan It's basically a commitment that we're going to work. We want to work with this organization in good faith, to see what they come up with. That's what it comes down with

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:03:48

me. We do this with the simple motion of the council saying that we are very interested in seeing what they have in mind and then have them produce something. I mean, we only have a brochure let alone you know.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:04:02

I don't think that's how the world class organizations like this operate frankly. And I think that's where, you know, that's where I'm coming from is it. We're not binding ourselves but we are looking at a really, you know real opportunity and I just don't want to see it evaporate on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:04:26

us. That in the last five pages are the brochure. I mean this does explain I mean, the integral climate change solutions talks about Ojai. It talks a lot about specific things in Ojai, talks to some of the general ideas about what they want to do. It's all the principles of it that are consistent with the memorandum of understanding. It has project design. We're not at a point where we have a site plan OSBT- Dave Kuntz OSBT-

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:04:56

Curt

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:04:56

Brown Here

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:04:56

we go. Which is fine.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:05:15

I believe Mr. Mayor, what it says that if revenues are generated and that the MOU offers a circumstance for that would occur. I don't believe that there's anything in here. And by the way, there's nothing in here that really locks us in anything but I don' know where you're talking about where there's some sort of kind of agreement or understanding that there definitely going to be economic drivers on the property?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:05:38

They indicated in here that there was some provision in case there ever were any profits or the net. What I would ask if I was doing this and somebody came to my office, I would say Ryan, where else are you doing this? Could you show us what your business plan is in South Africa or wherever this person has done this before just so we'd have some idea of what we're actually partnering in And what we might see here in Ojai, because I think Randy's right. They're buying the brand more than anything else. We don't have enough land here to make this much of a part. It's got to be more of a demonstration of some sort which is great it may work fine but it's just very strange that they've got all this money and these big shots why wouldn't they have some kind of thing that they hand out of

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:06:29

some sort Because every study area is different and they apply their creative expertise to each study area. And they just want, you know, will you partner with us in looking at

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:06:40

this? How about a list of the study areas they've done just so we would know where they'd been or what they were kind

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:06:47

of doing? Why Ojai? Well, I'm just saying why Ojai? How did we jump into the arena of this park. But again getting back to- I have an answer

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:07:00

for you but go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:07:00

ahead. Bill, I keep hearing this word we and I haven't heard the word we regarding community. I keep hearing we regarding four or five or six people. Yeah okay. I think it's...I just think this needs to be vetted properly.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:07:15

For them to come and interact with our community they need Carnegie

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:07:19

Mellon took three years to clearly demonstrate to this community, and how many meetings did we attend? How many events did we

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:07:30

go to?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:07:32

Where are they now? It didn't work. And that's what I'm trying to say.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:07:38

Can I read something that was given to me by one of the people involved with this? There there's 10 points Because I, you know, I was trying to understand it. So this is what she offered me. May I read this Mayor?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:07:54

Some

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:07:55

key things that I feel are important to focus on. One, this will be the first climate park in Ojai. I think she must mean in the United States.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:08:05

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:08:06

Global Green has the ability to fundraise and raise needed funds for these projects And we need funds for these projects. Three, this is the planning stage so the next step will be to announce this project so fundraising can begin and then the more specific planning can happen. Four This will be a collaborative effort involving local people and organizations. And that's her role, to help coordinate this. She lives in Ojai, the person who gave me this. This project- What?

Is this Sarah? No, you know her name is not on here and I know her name, I just can't...

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:08:52

Okay

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:08:53

well...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:08:53

She's not finished.

3:09 – 3:145 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:09:02

I like what I'm seeing. I'm just not understanding how this is all coming about, so I'm willing to invest time to understand it tonight. This project will involve and reflect all the sustainable eco-environmental efforts made thus far in Ojai. Now here's the part I really like. Six, there will be a large educational component to this effort which will draw in schools and even partnerships outside the United States. And I don't know quite what that means, the part about partnerships outside the United States. Seven, these are needed solutions that will revolutionize the planet. Eight, Online workshops and documentation of this process is already being discussed, especially as COVID reality forces the issue of more online programming.

Nine, a partnership with Global Green will open up the needed resources to fund green affordable housing along with a multitude of other projects at Ojai. And then she didn't include this here but she did mention something in a separate email about creating green jobs. I mean that's a huge vision you know that It sounds good, it sounds good. And I'm trying to understand it and I'm willing to keep listening to understand it better and I especially need to understand if, I mean, it seems to me that we're like in ideal location for this so why would they go elsewhere? That's the part I don't understand Because we obviously can express our interest in learning more. So why would they go elsewhere? They'll

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:10:54

find somewhere else to go if we don't do it, I mean they will find somewhere else to go. This happened because of a confluence of luck and we are staring the gift horse in the mouth. Look there are YouTube videos and tons of information about Bjorn online. I just forwarded one of them that I watched a while back when we first met with him that I just forwarded to James We did not put a list of information and other sites for you to go to and look at. They put together this very comprehensive integral climate change solution document that's tailored exactly for Ojai, and discusses a lot of the Ojai-centric issues. If we want to talk about what a climate park is and other things in more general terms or how they might be applicable not on paper but in ideas then type in Bjorn's name It's all based on what he calls the Earth Charter and Integral Climate Park Design.

He has put a few of these together, it is a complicated kind of miniature ecosystem from the soil to the sand, to the grass, to the trees. And we have talked and what I envision this being is that while the people are in there working hard on the invasive species removal grant We can have the climate people in there at the same time. There may be some crossover where they work together, there are many things where they don't work together but there may also be an educational component that when we spoke with them in their first visit because they utilize some services of UCSB students, graduate students and undergrad students who may be working on the project as volunteers or through their school that hopefully we would love to incorporate Local curriculums from the public schools and private schools to be able to go there and view this.

Bjorn's totally on board with that, Global Green is on board with that. There's a lot of synergies we can create with this and I agree. We're not doing it in kind of the normal path and the normal timing because we got tripped up on this thing right before COVID and now right before our break They're telling us, hey look we really want to get this started and we're not sure you wait a couple more months whether you know we're going to wait around to do it. So I understand it is there is a lack of information but If you want to dig in and do the research, look up the names. It's all online. I mean there's tons of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:13:22

information. This was mentioned in a proposal that the chamber gave us two weeks ago so I did look at that time because I saw it mentioned. What I want to get clear on...I'm inclined to...you know, I know you and Bill have the best interests at Ojai At heart, you know that your motivations

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:13:46

are. Okay, come on, we're getting late. We're all moving around.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:13:49

I want to ask our city attorney about this MOU the last two paragraphs on page seven is this really something that we can end at any point the way it's written? Because there's some, I just don't understand

3:14 – 3:1938 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:14:13

Legally, yes. You can end the agreement if what is written what is in your agenda packet is what is approved and what is signed under section of the final section termination amendment. The city has the right to terminate this agreement at any time without consequence legally. Politically is another question that will be for the council of course and it does not prohibit you from pulling out of it at any time with of course that would be accountable decision

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:14:41

Mayor?

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:14:42

Yes. Okay, so what I would just ask you know Susan to think about is upside versus downside okay the down side as we've just heard is very strictly in our hands with determination agreement. In terms of you know if something starts to develop that we're not comfortable with On the other hand, there's major upside. If they show, if we approve this and then that gives them the door to come and start making presentations and demonstrate to us what they're thinking of in more specifics. To invest in that kind of resources to make those kinds of presentations to us. And the downside of asymmetrically of not taking advantage of this tonight is they're gonna go on to another opportunity So to me, the symmetry is very asymmetric on the positive side here because of what Matthew just described.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:15:49

And so basically we're agreeing to they're not going to be doing any digging or building or anything of that nature? No. Okay I'm fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:15:58

No no absolutely not. Mayor I just have one last comment why would we make any agreement with a gun to our head And that's what I'm hearing, Bill. You don't make a choice

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:16:10

and you're going to run away anyway. I want to just for the purpose of it's getting late take a motion to approve the MOU.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:16:20

I'll second.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:16:22

Okay, I think we've debated far enough. Do we need a roll call on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:16:28

Matt? No because we're not promising to spend any money Let's just take a vote mate, let's just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:36

have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:16:36

vote. It clearly will be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:39

split. In effect a lease of sorts. Let's have a vote. That's fine. Call the roll.

Roll-call vote 1–0 · 2 under review
Show transcript
Mayor Pro Tem Blatz? Yes. Mayor Johnston? I'm gonna abstain
ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:16:54

because I don't have enough information.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:57

Council Member Weirich?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:16:59

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:17:00

Council Member Haney?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:02

You know, I don't like abstaining but that would be the reason that I can't vote yes or no. We don't have enough information.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:17:09

Council Member Francina? I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:17:11

voting yes because I believe the information is available to us you know we can find out. I'm voting yes. Yes.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:17:22

Okay I guess motion passes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:17:26

Thank you everybody well we'll come back and you'll feel much more comfortable when we get to do this again

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:17:31

I hope so but it's the first time i've ever heard of a subject being introduced by Randy being fearful that these guys are so rich and this being such a cheap operation that they didn't even put a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:43

package. I'm telling you, you guys don't laugh about it but when you think about the gentrification of this community and the fact that the wealth is moving into this community and if that doesn't

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:17:52

concern... No, you're right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:55

We

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:17:56

have a very strong termination agreement yeah okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:18:01

We're going to have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:18:06

the homeless sleeping next door. I'll keep it, you know,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:18:10

less gentrified. Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:18:12

Susan.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:18:17

Okay. Number seven before we are out of time altogether. Mr. City Manager this is on here because the emergency committee HAB-Jacques Juilland, moderatoring the meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:18:44

Yeah, so the Climate Committee has requested that the City Council consider this and the City Council previously talked about having the Building Appeals Board review it as a building code amendment but hasn't actually directed that the Building Appeals Board do so. So it's brought back onto the agenda for council to decide whether to send it to a commission or Schedule it for a future presentation or determine how the council would like to proceed with it.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:19:16

I'm going to move to refer to the BAB for review as a Title IX issue.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:19:20

I'll

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:19:20

second

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:19:21

that. Okay, it's moved and seconded. Is there any discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:19:25

I'm not understanding the city. You're asking them to first go before the building appeals board? Correct. So the building appeals board doesn't vote on it, they just get a presentation?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:19:42

They would make a recommendation. Same as the fire code right or their title nine?

3:19 – 3:2946 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:19:53

Yes. It's

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:19:53

basically a Title IX issue and so they would be, we're delegating for them to do a full, to hear the presentation, do Q&A, deliberate on it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:05

And we can attend that? Yeah, we can attend it.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:20:09

Oh yeah! It's a policy matter. We can speak at it. We can speak at it Suzy, it's a policy matter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:15

That's correct. But it will come before us, that's my concern.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:20:19

So the council could deal with it. Okay, we have a motion and a second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:20:25

Can I note Mayor Johnson that there were two public comments one from Laura Ward and one from Michelle Ellison? And those have been provided to the City Council as well.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:20:35

Right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:20:36

yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:37

I think Laura was based on she thought we were going to make a decision tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:20:42

Yeah i think so too which we are not planning to.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:44

Yeah it's more appropriate for the future I'll hang onto it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:20:48

Just the discussion item. Should we have those two read out loud? Isn't that what we're supposed to do?

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:20:53

Well, one was one favorite and one was concerned and I've read both messages but i think we can clear this personally yeah it didn't you know just have a foot record okay uh we need is there any objection to referring this to the building appeals board hearing none the motion passes council member reports Don't feel obligated to give one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:21:21

I will say this, Johnny real quickly at nine o'clock tonight there was a what was the I don't want to say it wrong the global meditation centered out of Ojai to contact extra extraterrestrials. I have not confirmed whether or not they contacted any extraterrestrials but pretty cool that this global synchronized meditation tonight that's been an ongoing 10 day In case anybody didn't hear about it was centered out of Ojai tonight.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:21:48

So you can report in September whether they made contact, okay? Susan do you have anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:21:55

I just want to remind my colleagues and the public that there's another community advisory committee meeting tomorrow Wednesday July 15th at 11 o'clock to go Ojai demonstration project and You know, it's gonna be an interesting discussion. So yeah-

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:22:16

What was the time on that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:22:18

11 o'clock.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:22:19

11 o'clock okay. Randy you have anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:22:23

No I wanted to say on Ryan on that group is meditating they must have meditated on your climate park so no sir I

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:22:35

have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:22:35

nothing

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:22:35

to add. Okay Bill I think they were inspiring us to deal with the Ventura County Sheriff's Association.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:22:43

Okay, okay city managers report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:22:48

A couple of quick things. As Council knows, we adopted that legislative platform earlier this year that allows us to write some letters of support or opposition when they're urgent or timely. We have two that we wrote this week that I wanted to report back on that are in line with the platform and also make sure you get any feedback if there's any. We wrote one on Pine Mountain logging. It's a letter of opposition that we will send to the Forest Service tomorrow morning, to the proposal to log Pine Mountain. We also wrote one on industrial hemp. The ordinance has been prepared by the county and is being discussed tomorrow at an Agricultural Committee meeting which I will be attending via Zoom.

The ordinance has two potential setbacks on hemp. One is a half mile from residential zones, the other is 600 feet from residential zones. The city of Ojai from the beginning has been adamant that we are requesting at least a half mile from all city limits or from the entire city limit not from just residential zones Due to the air quality and the smell impact that we would have here in the valley. So, we've submitted a comment letter to the committee on that and we will attend the meeting to make the same comments.

And then lastly, Southern California Edison has started to send out public safety power shutoff information. We all know that was a big issue last year whenever the fire weather Was approaching and we are anticipating that that's going to start happening more frequently in the next couple of months. The public safety power shutoffs if you recall is when they turn off the power prior to a what they consider to be fire weather to prevent a fire.

So Southern California Edison has been contacting cities, and we got a report on something new they're doing called the customer resource center which is a center that will resident residents and customers can go to to get. Things like water and resiliency devices. And we requested today that they have that they consider adding one of these centers in Ojai and again identified some locations that they would be able to use including some city sites to do so but I think importantly just the public safety power shutoffs. I think it's time to start thinking about those and preparing for those and will stay in contact with Edison to do so.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:25:33

Mayor, I had a question. James will you keep us informed when the county makes a decision on that? I think it's the MECO, the cottage kitchen thing because I'm not against that idea in principle. I think many of us are okay with it in principle we just don't like the idea of the default discretion being taken away so once the County Act I would like you know just let us know

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:25:58

For sure, we'll do that. And the 32nd in terms

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:26:01

of our local option.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:03

Thank you. Yeah. The 32nd report back on that is that I think it's three cities now have basically sent the same letter we sent which is we oppose the way it's proposed right now and uh the county last week noted that they were planning to bring it in June at the end of June but it was delayed a little bit because of coronavirus but they're preparing to bring it soon so we'll bring an update as soon as we hear

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:26:25

And the other comment is I didn't realize you were like me, finding... I don't know when you sleep. I sometimes wonder when I sleep. James and I were both watching Camarillo's council meeting. What was their third one past midnight?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:40

Yeah it was 1 30 I think.

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:26:42

So we're looking like a paragon of efficiency here.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:26:47

Good thank you for your help. Okay we're going to on break and so there are probably going to be a number of things that will come up during that period of time that we'll want to talk about for agenda. I rather than trying to figure them out tonight because we don't know what priority they'll take, city manager and i will work with all members of the council to be sure that if they have urgencies that they need to get on the agenda that we'll see that they're included.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:27:17

I have an urgency that I want to bring up I know that there's been at least one or two letters in, you know there was an article in Ojai Valley News and the headline said hundreds of invasive trees to be axed in Ojai. And consequently there were letters to the editor questioning that I think that we owe it to the public and we owe it to concerned people like me who may have a different view about, you know, so-called invasive species. It seems like we need to maybe do a tour of the area or a more detailed report on what this is all about because otherwise you're going to have a lot of outraged citizens. People need to understand the justification for this so I want to know, I think this is not scheduled till September? Is that correct James?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:28:19

That's I believe so and uh the Public Works Director and I spoke about it today and he's been getting calls too so we did talk about putting some info a report together that we can provide to the public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:28:30

Okay, and then maybe do a walking tour even? I mean, I would like one personally. Maybe Bill can take me, you know...

PresenterCouncil Member WyrickProposed · by introduction3:28:38

I'd be happy to go down there. It's it's a great

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:28:41

walk. Yeah we could coordinate that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:28:44

Go for a

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:28:46

walk with Bill and let me know. We'll see what we can put on the agenda for you okay?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:28:51

And then I don't know that this is urgent yet, but the uranium mine issue that Michael Shapiro brought up and that's constantly in James Hines' emails. Maybe at some point we want to do a letter concerning

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:29:10

that. Under our platform, I'm sure we can cover that. That's a real jeopardy for the town.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:29:15

We're working on that. We've

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:29:17

sent a letter. It has already been written, Mayor and Council, on that mine.

ElectedJohnny JohnstonMayorProposed · by role3:29:22

Okay, we are done here. Nothing more to see. Have a nice break.