City Council — 2021-02-10February 10, 2021

Switch meeting
BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 February 10, 2021

Click any transcript line to jump the video there.

Meeting Summary

  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Present: Stix, Weirick, Blatz, Francina, Haney

This summary was AI-generated to save you time. It may miss or misstate details, so verify against the official recording and the transcript.

At a glance

Maricopa Highway Active Transportation Program (ATP) Demonstration Project

  • Staff presented data showing a 58% decline in speeding and increased pedestrian and bicycle usage since the December 12 launch.
  • Council directed staff to continue the demonstration with minor modifications, including removing every other planter to improve emergency vehicle access.
  • The council requested written statements of concerns from affected agencies such as the fire department, school board, and hospital.
  • A motion passed to proceed with the current design while conducting a feasibility analysis for extending safety improvements to other areas.

Full summary

Agenda Item: Maricopa Highway Active Transportation Program (ATP) Demonstration Project

    Staff Presentation and Data Review

    • The Public Works Director and staff presented an update on the Maricopa Highway lane reduction demonstration, which went live on December 12 following a "Quick Build" methodology using temporary materials. The project originated from a 2015 grant application and a 2018 request, with a $430,000 grant awarded in 2019. Staff outlined the outreach process, which included 15 Community Action Committee meetings, workshops, and collaboration with Caltrans.
    • Key data and findings presented included:
    • Traffic and Safety: Average vehicle speeds decreased from approximately 37 mph to 33 mph. Vehicles traveling at 40 mph or higher dropped by over 50% (a 58% decline in speeding).
    • Usage: Pedestrian activity increased by 28% to 86% (130–230 additional people per day), and bicycle activity increased by 23–173 people per day. Car activity decreased, with no measurable increase in dwell times or congestion.
    • Emergency Access: The 11-foot wide bike lane was tested and confirmed to accommodate fire engines. Alternative routes (Church Road, Cuyama) were identified for detours.
    • Public Feedback: Approximately 150 survey responses were received. Support for the project was split roughly 50-50. 56% supported permanent bicycle and pedestrian improvements, while 65% cited speeding as a previous issue addressed by the demonstration.
    • Incidents: A bicycle-car collision occurred in December, leading to design adjustments. Vandalism of planters was reported.

    Public Comment

    • Residents provided comments regarding the project.
    • Support: Speakers cited improved safety for cyclists and pedestrians, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, reduced speeding, and the beautification of the corridor. Specific points included the need for safe routes to Nordhoff High School and the reduction of vehicle miles traveled.
    • Concerns: Opponents raised issues regarding data validity due to pandemic conditions, potential impacts on emergency evacuation routes (citing the Thomas Fire), increased traffic congestion during school hours, and the removal of parking spaces. Some speakers referenced petitions opposing the lane reduction and expressed frustration with "armadillo" delineators and the aesthetic impact of planters.
    • Suggestions: Residents suggested improvements such as better signage for the Valley Bike Trail, adding lighting for pedestrian crossings, and conducting feasibility studies for extending the two-lane configuration to other areas, such as downtown Ojai Avenue.

    Council Discussion

    • Council members engaged in a detailed discussion with project consultants and staff. Key topics included:
    • Funding and Costs: Questions were raised regarding the source of funds for additional city staff time and materials beyond the initial contract. It was clarified that the city is using existing general fund dollars for these costs, and the city will not be reimbursed. Staff noted that new grant funding was awarded to close the funding gap for construction (totaling $3.7 million) and support redesign efforts.
    • Data Collection: The council requested monthly reports and data breakdowns comparing pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods to account for shifts in usage.
    • Agency Coordination: The council emphasized the need for written statements of concerns and requirements from affected entities, including the school board, hospital, fire department, police department, and water/sanitation districts, noting that verbal assurances were insufficient for liability and planning purposes.
    • Design Modifications: Staff outlined immediate modifications to the demonstration, including removing every other planter to increase spacing for emergency vehicle access, improving signage for the two-way bike lane, adding brighter green paint, adjusting delineators for U-turns and right turns, and adding reflectors. Staff recommended against removing all planters due to their role in delineating the bike lane.
    • Design Alternatives: Discussion occurred regarding the "Class 4" protected bike lane versus other configurations. Council members debated whether to use available grant funds to demonstrate alternative design options to gather broader public feedback or to proceed with the current design to finalize the project.
    • Evacuation and Safety: The council discussed the need for clear evacuation signage and routes, noting that alternative routes exist but may not be well-known to residents.

    Motion and Vote

    • A motion was made to direct staff to continue the Maricopa Highway lane reduction demonstration with minor modifications as described in Attachment C. The motion included a provision for staff to conduct a feasibility analysis for extending the two-way bike lane on the Nordhoff side and for extending similar safety improvements to other areas, including downtown pedestrian crossings. The motion was seconded.
    • The Council voted on the motion. The motion passed.