BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 8, 2021

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:008 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role0:00

Are we ready?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:02

Recording

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:02

in progress. Okay, good evening. Ojai City Council June 8th 2021 meeting call to order may we have a we have quorum and we have a roll call please Gail.

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 4
Show transcript
Mayor Sticks here. Mayor Pro Tem Wyrick here. Council Member Blatz here. Council Member Francina here.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:30

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:32

Thank you, Gail and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:33

Bill will you please? I have a question am i supposed to click continue or will that do something weird?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role0:39

I think click continue. I think I just clicked that too. You can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed0:43

click continue.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:46

Please uh Bill will you lead us in the pledge? All right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed0:50

ready again I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation Under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:09

Thank you Bill.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:10

And approval of the agenda? I'll move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:17

Second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:18

Thanks. Roll

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:32

Hi.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:34

Thank you. And then we'll move on to presentations we have a presentation It's officially Pride Month in Ojai, so I'm presenting the proclamation to some representatives from Diversity Collective. They work with a lot of our local kids. They work in public schools, private schools to help the LGBTQ community within the schools and also there's a representative, a transgender representative from our local community, so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:09

Where are they out of?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:11

Their office is in Ventura, the kids go there to support groups and then they come and work with kids all over the valley. They work in our school system also. And Michelle lives in, she works here. Okay are we ready for it? Thank you!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:32

Good morning. It's my great honor to be here today with some representatives from Diversity Collective and our LGBTQ community here in Ohio. What an honor, it's a great day. And as someone who has been a lifelong educator, worked with thousands of kids, it's really monumental that we're celebrating including diversity and including everyone in our community.

So without further ado, I'd like to read this proclamation making June Ojai Pride Month. Proclamation Whereas the lesbian gay bisexual transgender and questioning LGBTQ communities form an integral part of a vibrant culture of the city of Ojai and Whereas the diverse LGBTQ community continues to contribute to the widespread academic, economic, artistic and social spheres within the Ojai Valley and beyond.

And whereas The month of June is designated as Pride Month to commemorate the Stonewall riots which occurred in June of 1969 and are generally recognized as the catalysts of the LGBTQ rights movement. And whereas, being out and visible is one of the most important actions

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:04

that members of the LGBTQ community can engage in to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:08

provide positive role models and to support those who may be struggling with their sexual orientation. And whereas, the

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:18

City of Ojai is committed to protecting the civil rights of all its citizens as well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:25

as fighting discrimination supporting fairness and celebrating diversity. Now, therefore to be resolved that I Betsy Sticks Mayor of the City of Ojai and on

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:38

behalf of the Ojai City Council do recognize June 2021 as Pride Month

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:45

in Ojai

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:47

Yay!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:48

And encourage all

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:49

residents to recognize the enduring efforts and ongoing contributions of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed4:54

LGBTQ communities in Ojai and nationwide. So it's my great honor, and in the spirit of the power of love, to present this to Ken, and Michelle, and Nicolette, and Michelle. So grateful for you being here, and thank you for representing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed5:16

Thank you very much and thank you and the City of Ojai for your support of the LGBTQ community.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed5:23

As a local member of the LGBTQ community, and as a trans woman I am so grateful at the City of Ojai for making this proclamation. It makes me feel safer in our local community and I trust that we're going in a good direction moving forward.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role5:45

Great, exciting. And just to follow up June 27th will be the 30th annual Ojai Pride March 11 a.m Libbey Park and Helen and Lynn I don't know if y'all know them they're amazing people who started 30 years ago and there'll be a celebration in the march so come join thank you any other

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 4 · 1 under review
Show transcript
call please Gail. Council Member Blatz? Yes. Council Member Francina? Yes. Council Member Haney? Yes, Mayor sticks. Yes, Mayor pro tem why Rick.

0:06 – 0:1122 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role6:09

commission reports James?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed6:12

I didn't actually, I think there may have been one commissioner on but I'm not sure if they were on for the commissioner report or another item. Is there a commissioner signed up for this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:21

No commissioners signed up for the commissioner's reports. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed6:25

thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role6:27

All right we'll

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:27

move

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role6:28

on to public communication.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role6:34

We do have public

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role6:35

comment. Public comments please Steve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:38

We have two speakers. The first one is Severo Lora, and I'll go ahead and bring him in. Severo you should be able to speak now if you're muted please unmute yourself and go ahead you have three minutes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed6:53

Okay could everybody hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:55

Yes

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role6:56

yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed6:56

okay yeah thank you Mayor Sticks and council members I really appreciate you guys having me here. I know it's kind of different, I'm not used to this whole virtual stuff being on the dais with you guys or with some of you guys, it's different times but I just wanted to get on here just opportunity because I heard that our Public Works Director Mr Grant has departed, don't know any details or anything why or if he's retiring or whatever his plans are but I just wanted to take some time to recognize him as somebody that have has worked with them and known him for quite some time.

And the amount of work that he gave to this community and expertise. Just one of those staff members that try to stay the course, try to follow the council member's direction was honest trustworthy. I just have lots of good things to say about Mr. Grant and my experience with them often on and off the council. very stand up guy who really wanted nothing but good things for the city of Ojai. And it just, it brings me sadness that he's moving on or if he retired, he's just planning his life. But I think that as a Ojai resident, I think we're losing a strong staff member and I just wanted to recognize him during your public meeting And I wish him the best in his endeavors.

And I know that wherever he goes, he's going to be an asset and more than anything not only was he a great staff member but I witnessed him being an amazing father and nothing, and also just a wonderful husband. So I know that he's with the good hands and I just wish him the best. And I just wanted to say it in public. So thank you for your time and appreciate your willingness to hear me.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role9:18

Thank you, Severo. Next Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed9:24

We also have Wendy Lerner signed up, but she is not in the queue. So that is the last person I have showing signed up for public communications.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role9:34

Okay thank you all right moving on to the consent calendar a motion to approve everything? Move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed9:44

Yeah I'll second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role9:45

Okay, great. All right, may we have a vote

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 Move to approve. Yeah I'll second. Okay, great. All right, may we have a vote please? I'll call the vote but also we have one speaker for th
Show transcript
please? I'll call the vote but also we have one speaker for the consent calendar once we've done the vote. Council Member Francina? Yes. Council Member Blatz? Yes Mayor Stixx? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Weyrich? Yes Council Member Haney? Yes

Great thank you Gail and public comment

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed10:13

Yes, we have, whoops. Sorry I had my mic off. We have Bill Miley is the one speaker on this. Bill you should be able to talk if you're muted please unmute yourself and go ahead.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated10:25

Yeah for the record, my name is Bill Miley. It's a good thing I didn't have any critiquing of that but anyway, I would like to just say that I liked the list for road maintenance. I'm glad we are doing that. I went over the list and I like what you're doing I also like, I've been supporting the library tax for years. I'm glad we're doing it again. Also, I like the... Let's see what do we have here?

I guess that's about it. Oh no, assessments for the lighting and landscaping district. I've been supporting that for years. Notably there's no increase, that's great Same way with the Arquette Plaza Maintenance District. Pleased that that's continuing, no increase. So I'm just impressed with what management and the council did on the city on all of this. Thanks.

0:11 – 0:2221 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role11:26

Thank you Mr. Miley. All right is that it Gail? Yes, that's it. Can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:34

we make a comment Mayor Stuckey? Yeah sure. So we're in agreement that we are not meeting in July, just so the public knows there's no City Council meetings in July.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role11:46

Great. Yeah and we'll post notice of that on our website and on the doors so everybody is aware as well.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role11:53

Good. Okay, well moving on to discussion. I just wanted to review a couple protocols so we can have the most efficient and civil meeting possible. So just reminder for staff questions please make sure the question is a question and doesn't turn into a comment. So quick question like tennis game no cross talk so please bring it back to the chair to me And let's just make sure it's all civil discourse. It's okay to disagree, not make it personal and in terms of responding to public comment you know quick response is fine please don't make it a conversation and of course no swearing children are watching.

Okay let's move on to number four COVID.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role12:46

I think we have, we actually have two public hearings. Yeah, Bill

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:51

Riley thought it was part of the consent calendar but we have two and three. Okay let's move on to number two.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role13:03

Okay and i'll keep these pretty brief because actually overall I think it's actually pretty good news. I think um uh the first item the lighting and landscaping district assessments The item is to adopt the resolution, well hold the public hearing, adopt a resolution to levy the assessments for the landscaping and lighting districts. And then one in three and then to move forward with that process. I think the good news is that for years and years these reports started with this is how much further in debt these funds are but as the report noted And I think it was 20, I don't have it written down yet. Several years back, I think it was 2012 to 16 if I recall the voters had approved an increase to these assessments to get them out of the deficit that they had fallen into.

It was a 5% increase each year for five years which has now been completely implemented And the good news is after much effort, we are finally at the point where those funds are out of a deficit and are actually building up a small surplus that can be used for bigger improvements. With the approval of this item, we anticipate that the lighting and landscaping district funds will end the year with a $180,000 fund balance Which means that that's money that can be used, or that's after paying for streetlight expenses. And then that money could be used to start doing some repairs to curbs, gutters and street trees. So I think just to kind of wrap it up you know for years and years we would come and say this is how much further in a deficit we are.

For the first year we have we have an adequate fund balance To levy the assessments and make sure that we have the funding there to continue to do these repairs. So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role15:28

Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:30

James how can we increase The amount of money that we have, this $26,000 isn't going to go very far. It might prune five trees. It might replace 20 feet of sidewalk. It might do 10 feet of curb. How do you assess this and how can we move forward with generating more income for these special districts to actually do special projects within these districts?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role16:03

The point we've built up to at this point isn't enough to do a whole lot of work. I think the, we are at the point now where we paid off the deficit and we have a small surplus. If we continue on in this rate, I think we were anticipating that it would be about $30,000 of additional surplus a year. So it will take awhile to build up a big surplus to do any sort of big project But at this point, the district is paying the cost that it hadn't been paying before. So I guess it's a glass half full situation but if we were going to increase it, because of Proposition 218 would have to be a vote and so You know, it would be a question of if the voters would support increasing it to be able to do even more projects. But at this point we are you know...

It should be noted it's an accomplishment to even get to the point where it's paying for itself at this point and so that'll be the next question. Do we want to go further? Bill and then Randy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed17:20

Is that is the electronic hand working Mayor or it is okay good. Has the Edison tariff been modified to actually give the jurisdictions a reasonable rate of return by Edison? When you do LED retrofits for years, the tariff really didn't give cities a rate of return. And then there's still the issue of for years, a lot of cities have tried to get these these polls back and I guess nothing's changed there. So, I basically wondered if anything has changed in terms of the tariff to make it more realistic for the energy savings of LED replacement and also if there is any change in terms of cities being able to get this equipment back under their control?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role18:11

So the short answer is no. I think, I reported on this last year when we were finally saying maybe by next year we'll actually break even so you know that we had looked at it last year and if people may recall that we had talked to other cities about joining kind of a coalition to do that to take back the polls and have some options there It didn't go very far, I think because of COVID. It's just none of the cities have the time to really make progress on it. So that's something we can follow up on. Actually, the other day I thought about reaching out and asking- And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed18:49

then what about the tariff? For years, the Public Utilities Commission set the tariffs so it really didn't pay you to put even with the dramatic energy savings of LED, you didn't get it accruing to the fund. Is that changed too? Has the tariff changed at all? Not to my

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role19:05

knowledge, but we could do more research on that. Not to my knowledge at this time, but we'll look into it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed19:13

Because that's also an energy efficiency and it's really ultimately a greenhouse gas issue too. Yeah.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role19:22

Can I just ask you how much time that will take you James? To do

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role19:25

that? We had met with another city about trying to get the poles back Um, like a coalition. Like it'll be, you know, the group of cities are going to work together on it and that one will take some time. Uh, look, you know, I've like, you know, if I were to estimate, I think we spent maybe 20 hours on it last year and didn't get where we wanted to be with it because all the cities were having distractions, but I would estimate this year we'll probably put another 20 hours into that. And then, uh, the tariffs, we could research that in a couple of hours.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role20:01

Okay, thanks. And just a quick any new street light locations or not?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role20:07

So potentially as part of some of the other projects we're working on that will come back to council there's going to be some street light options but not related to this item so

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role20:19

okay great thank you. Do you need a motion? Randy it's a question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed20:26

I had two more questions. One, James in each of these special districts you know how many lights are in each one of them so that we could reconcile how much savings or potential savings and the other thing is again going back to my question about special projects I know I'm in one of these districts. So to me, if someone came to me and proposed that we were going to do so much curb and gutter or so much sidewalk or so much in addition to our annual CIP expenditures it...I might be willing to say well I'd love to participate in increasing the tax in my special district. So, I just think that we need to figure out how to look outside of this box of slowly fulfilling it with very little funding and think about how we can actually fund something and then designate those funds for that.

The mayor and I both live right by Drown, and I received an incredible letter today about speed bumps and speeding and the lack of curb and a lack of gutter. And it's just a horrible street. So again, if that's part of district one or district three, it seems to me that we could earmark something to enhance or expedite the improvement on that street as something in your special district.

I think we need to start looking at this a little differently than just accepting what little bit of money we get on an annual basis.

0:22 – 0:2830 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role22:04

People on drown would sure be happy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:08

We'd all be happy.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role22:09

Yes, we would.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed22:10

That's all I have.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role22:14

Anything else?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role22:22

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed22:22

we have one speaker Bill Miley. I can bring him in.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:37

Mr. Miley, you should be able to speak.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated22:40

I'm Bill Miley. I am back again. I did make a mistake but I had forgotten that there was a deficit for a bunch of years and so I am impressed by the manner in which the deficit has been filled up and we're operating in black I think Randy's comment is really good about Drowned. I'd like to see something done about that, and maybe the capital improvement project funds could be done. That's really a bad street.

Thanks.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role23:13

Mr. Miley? Any more? No

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:16

further public comments. Okay,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role23:18

thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:21

Do we need a motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed23:26

First to close the public hearing and then a motion would be in order if that was the council's preference.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role23:31

Okay, let's close the hearing please. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:36

I'll make a motion. Sure thanks Susan. So we've already done the first part So we are, I make a motion to adopt a resolution ordering the work and levering the assessments for landscaping and lighting district number one without an increase of or during 2021. Do I need to read it? Can I just say and three and four?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed24:07

That'd be fine. The motion is to adopt, to move the recommended action items two, three, and four.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:13

Yeah. That's the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed24:14

motion.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role24:17

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed24:19

Second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role24:20

Great, all right. May we have a roll call please, Gail?

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion. Thank you. Second. Great, all right. May we have a roll call
Show transcript
Mayor Pro Tem Weirich? Yes. Mayor Stixx? Yes Council Member Haney? Yes Council Member Francina? Yes Council Member Blatz? Yes

Great thank you so much All right, moving on to number three discussion item number three COVID.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role24:47

We have one more public hearing for the arcade district.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role24:50

Sorry.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role24:52

Let's do it. Thank you. So yeah, the next public hearing very similar but it's for the Arcade Plaza Maintenance District which Was a result of the fact that after the renovation, the $2.5 million renovation of the Arcade Plaza in 2002, that over the years we realized that there was more and more maintenance and repairs needed on the Arcade Plaza. So in 2012 much like the lighting and maintenance district, a voter approved 5% per year increase went into effect to try Reversed the trend of deficits. There have been deficits of up to $40,000 per year prior to that.

Similarly, although not quite as much of a surplus, those assessments have gone into place. We've made up the deficits and again another accomplishment where this year we are actually at a, we've erased the deficits and we are at a fund balance of $10,000 To Council Member Haney's point, there's not a whole lot we could do with $10,000 but the first step was to get out of the deficit and out of debt on those funds. And we have done that.

But so this public hearing is our staff is recommending that city council hold the public hearing and then adopt the resolution to levy the assessments for fiscal year 21 and 22. So with that, I can answer any questions.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role26:40

Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed26:42

I just can't let this go. Every year we do this and every year I come back saying the same thing. How? And I think what this plays into is James, I asked recently for in fact, Two or three months ago to have a maintenance assessment for all of our facilities. And I think this would play right into that, that if we had it we'd have a clear evaluation of the conditions of our facilities and then we could actually earmark funding Rather than waiting for someone to call us and say, we got a leaky roof. So I'm just trying to think how we can be more proactive in these special districts and like to see you put on your thinking cap between now and let's say next year and let us figure something out.

And so-

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role27:34

Yeah, I think the one thing to keep in mind for any of these rates to change, we'd have to go through a Prop 218 vote process which would Probably we'd have to aim for, or I think we would aim for that to be in 2022. So just as far as timing and process it would have to go through Prop 218 there would be some cost but we can start thinking about that so. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed28:04

Bill? Just to be clear I assume correct me if i'm wrong and so it's a question that this includes landscaping, maintenance expenditures in the plaza and a program of landscaping to Randy's point. A program of landscaping could be an eligible 218 planned expenditure. Okay yeah this does include landscaping thank you

0:28 – 0:4014 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role28:31

any other questions uh public comment Gail

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:37

yes we We have one public comment from Bill Miley. I will bring him in. Bill, you should be able to speak. Go

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated28:45

ahead. Hi. I am here, Bill Miley. I have nothing else to do so that's why I pay attention. I was impressed that there was nobody against this from the Arcade Plaza businesses. That was impressive. I didn't hear anybody supportive of it but silence would be support. So I was impressed. I'm impressed that we have a positive balance, that's great. It's the core of our city folks as you know, okay?

But I would like to see more greenery in the arcade somewhere more trees on Ojai Avenue or plants along with the city areas so it looks like there's a little bit more life there. That might be nice, I would like that. But anyway, I'm very impressed with what I read and what exists. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Miley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:44

That's it Gail? That's it no more public speakers.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:48

Okay we'll close the public hearing. Discussion? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed29:54

have a question. Do things like benches in that area come out of this fund or out of the general fund?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role30:08

This fund, the major categories that it pays for is landscaping, lighting, sidewalks. And then there is other public improvements but I would We may be able to pay them from there, but I would say that if we were going to do things like benches it would probably come from just our public works maintenance fund. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed30:30

thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role30:31

Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:40

Bill? Well with thanks to Bill Miley for keeping us on our toes and I really do sincerely appreciate bringing his accumulated wisdom to our deliberations. I really mean that sincerely. I want to move adoption recommendation two and three. Second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role31:00

Great, may we have the roll call please Gail?

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move adoption recommendation two and three. Second. Great, may we have the roll call · 1 under review
Show transcript
Council Member Haney? Yes. Council Member Francina? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Weirich? Yes Mayor Stixx? Yes
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed31:18

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role31:20

Excellent, okay wonderful thank you all right now we can move on to number four COVID it's I'm so excited about the parade I can't wait to hear about James take it away

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role31:32

please. All right and uh I mentioned I think last meeting these presentations I think will get shorter and shorter as we get closer to June 15th but we do still have a brief presentation um I think Really, we'll keep it pretty simple. I think everybody's heard this but on June 2nd the County of Ventura moved to yellow tier. I think we were the third county in Southern California after I think it was LA and Orange County that we moved to yellow tier as you can see from the chart here the three statistics that they based that on we are well under at this point And we're in the yellow tier range. So we have moved to yellow tier, which means that certain categories become less restrictive. Gatherings can increase up to 100 people outdoors.

Private events can increase to 200 people outdoors and just a quick note along those lines is one of the things we've done now that we're in yellow tier Rentals so that people can, you know hold outdoor family parties and things again. So that was exciting for us and our recreation department has reopened that and anybody interested can contact Recreation to rent those facilities.

The other things that have happened is the gyms have increased capacity to 50%. Restaurant indoor capacities increased to 50% Wineries and breweries increased capacity and bars are finally able to reopen, although it's still just 25% capacity. And then outdoor live events which for us is important because of the Sterling Concerts and other local events we can increase capacity at those outdoor live events to 67%, It's really helpful. We've been meeting with all the different event holders and a lot were saying that if it didn't open up, they may have to cancel and I think that this will allow them to continue.

The other thing to keep in mind is this is expected to just be in effect for a couple of weeks actually one more week from today because on June 15th California, the state of California has said that we are essentially reopening to normal operations with exceptions for mega events of larger than 5,000 indoors or 10,000 outdoors. Which Ojai we couldn't think of any event that we had that large so for Ohio it essentially means we would be back to regular operations for things that happen here.

I think one important note on That is that the state has said at this point, but they anticipate that masking will no longer be required except on public transit. And then we wanted to mention this it'll impact us at city hall I'm sure it'll also impact other businesses as one wrinkle is they've the state has essentially announced that where there's a mixture in an office space or work environment where there's a mixture of vaccinated and unvaccinated people That they will require all workers in that room to wear a face covering.

And so we've met here at City Hall about what that means for us, and essentially what it means is anytime we have any employees or members of the public and where there's more than one in the same room, we're gonna ask everybody to keep a face covering on to be in compliance rather than ask people if they're vaccinated or things like that. And so we're kind of figuring that out. I'm sure the public probably has questions about that as well, and so that may be useful.

There has been talk that the state might change that soon because it's very confusing but in the meantime here at City Hall people coming in to do business at City Hall we're just asking everybody to wear a face covering to comply with that. That is the reopening process now and on June 15th. In the meantime, we still have the testing site on Wednesdays at Sarzotti Park from 9 AM to 3 PM.

The vaccination clinic has closed locally but vaccinations are now being offered at the local pharmacies by appointment including Ojai Village Pharmacy, The Medicine Shop in Rite Aid And then we continue to make progress as the county has gotten over 60% of all residents 12 and older have been at least one dose of the vaccine. So moving closer to those goals, and that's part of why we're reopening.

I mentioned this a minute ago but What the yellow tear and the June 15 announcement mean for us at City Hall is that we're planning to reopen city hall completely without appointment will have protocols in place that require face coverings and it'll have plexiglass shields, at the counters. We want to give people the opportunity to come into City Hall if they'd like, but we realize some people have told us that they're not comfortable yet. So we're going to continue to provide the telephone and email service for anyone who's not comfortable.

So it'll be this kind of a hybrid for the time being of people that are comfortable in person, great. And if you aren't, we'll still keep working through telephone and email. Similarly, we're going to do the same thing for our City Council and Commission meetings starting on June 16th. We're going to allow anybody who'd like to attend and speak electronically to do that or we will be opening up to have people attend here at city hall.

We're gonna really try to use our patio space which is I think we're very fortunate to have where people can sit outside You know, and be able to view the meeting and come in and make comments still. So we're going to have in-person in that way, and then we'll have the Zoom meetings as well. Then lastly, the questions we get most right now are about upcoming events so we just want to keep updating people on the status.

The Ventura County Potters Guild is this weekend in Libbey Park June 12th through 13th With COVID protocols in place. We had the art in the park, I think since the last meeting and we got very positive comments that people felt like it was a good event and we didn't receive any complaints. So thanks to the Art Center and them for doing that. And I think for a lot of people, it was the first event that almost felt normal again.

We're hoping to continue that in safe, positive ways here. The big one everybody's talking about is the 4th of July events. I can say that the slide noted that Caltrans permit was pending and as of about 3 45 PM this afternoon we were told that Caltrans has issued that permit so we announced as the city And I saw that it got some attention, to keep the right-of-way clear and to prevent the risk of people touching the same surfaces and all that kind of stuff. We're going to ask everybody not to put chairs out prior to Monday, June 28 at 8 AM. But it is looking very promising at this time The events will be able to occur.

And then just quickly, the first round of Sterling concerts is expected to start in mid-July. We're planning a centennial celebration on August 5th that we'll be providing more information on and that will be outdoor to be safe as well. And then the music festival still is scheduled for September 16th to 19th this year And we're still working on a scaled-down, more locally focused Ojai Day for this year.

So that's just a small snapshot of the many events that are in progress as we get closer to reopening here. And with that, that's all I have. I'm happy to answer any questions.

0:40 – 0:4616 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role40:44

Thank you, James. Exciting. Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:47

James, are we going to be going around to the local businesses and just asking them what their protocols are gonna be regarding employees? Some vaccinated and some not, what they're gonna do. And also just making them aware of what the policy is. So as

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role41:06

of June 15th there are essentially no COVID protocols. State's position is return to normal operations. So, yeah so you know so for us we're not planning to do that one thing we are planning to do is we're planning to pull the pickup zones I forgot to mention that because we mentioned that last meeting but we're going to pull those pickup zones on June 15th and we have notified all the businesses who have outdoor dining that um we need to extend permits prior to June 15th and what that process will be.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed41:49

Thank you. Bear in mind is that under recently released OSHA regulations from the California Department of Occupational Health and Safety, or rather Commission, the mask mandate will continue in many workplaces. In some the requirement from the state is that in a space in which everyone has proven to be vaccinated against COVID-19 masks or face coverings may be removed, but if you're in a space in which everyone is not known to be vaccinated against COVID-19 then masks must or face coverings must be maintained.

And so a number of businesses and the city will have to maintain masks based on that directive released last week from OSHA although there is some possibility of further change as the state works out where it wants us at the requirements. Isn't that what I just asked?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role42:36

Yeah yeah that's a good point the um yeah the mask Requirements are somewhat complicated. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed42:43

was just wondering how we're going to educate our businesses, that's all. Again i'm not going to expand on what I run into but I'm just saying what are we doing to help our our businesses so that we don't run into this confusion of who is policing the customer and who is policing the employee?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role43:08

What we'll do, I think one thing we can do on that is we can work with the chamber to try to send some information out to all the businesses about just best practices at this point. And I think the challenge with it, the reason why I'm thinking that will be a good option I do think, I expect there to be some change like maybe by or right after June 15th. So it's going to be a fluid situation so I think if we can work with the chamber to get the word out to the businesses on the mask issue that'd be an effective way to do it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed43:49

On that front I've sent us an assessment of the OSHA regs to staff and I'll work with James to make sure that gets sent to Jamie and through the chamber to the businesses

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role43:58

Thank you, Matt. And what about the issue? There's some issues with some of the outdoor dining, something about specific ones.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role44:08

Yeah. So as part of the extension process we're asking them to come in and provide approval from their property owners because we've heard that that's an issue in some cases. And then we're also checking with the immediate neighbors to make sure there's no negative impacts on other businesses being caused by that, like by one particular business impacting other businesses.

So that is part of the process to date we've only received one business that said or that has applied to extend their permit. We haven't heard from a lot of those businesses yet, we're not clear so we actually are sending reminders to everybody I think we sent them earlier today saying, reminder we're now one week out. You need to come in and extend your permits.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role45:03

Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed45:04

Mayor, I just want to clarify James if they don't have it in by the 15th that they'll have to remove their outdoor dining facilities.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role45:12

We've told everybody that if they don't have it in by June 15th, that we could require removal of the outdoor dining.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role45:20

And the chamber will remind them. Any other questions? A public comment on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed45:29

item, Gail. Yes we have one speaker Wendy Larner I can bring her in now and let's see Wendy you should be able to speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and talk

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed45:45

Thank you. I want to take a brief moment to make a comparison here, as is just now being revealed there has been a huge mistake in analyzing the source of the COVID-19 emergency Apparently, there was no objective investigation and it's appearing very likely whether intentional or unintentional. A lot of good evidence was simply ignored perhaps because the officials didn't like from where it came from.

That's again this genetic fallacy that I spoke to at a previous meeting. You will not commit the same mistakes in your decision-making about so called other quote, unquote emergencies. Particularly when they involve exercising emergency powers that take away the political and medical and economic and personal rights of the people you represent. Thank you.

0:46 – 1:029 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role46:58

Any other public comments Gail? No further public comments. Great all right moving on to discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed47:12

Wow do we need a motion to receive and file Mr City Attorney? That would be appropriate yes so move

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed47:24

I'll second it

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role47:25

great all right uh roll call

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move I'll second it great all right uh roll call
Show transcript
please Gail Council Member Haney? Yes. Council Member Francina? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Weirich? Yes, Mayor Sticks? Yes Council Member Blatz? Yes

Great and once again thank you so much James for all your work on this. This

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed47:51

might be our last Zoom meeting

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role47:54

Yeah. Anybody who loves Zoom can stay on Zoom, but I expect most of us will not want to stay on

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role48:03

Zoom. Great. Okay. Number five is budget. James?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role48:12

Thank you. This is my last presentation of the day. Bear with me. So this is our third budget workshop. And essentially, we had our first budget workshop where we talked about the general fund and how that was looking this year. And then we have the second budget workshop where we talked about CIP and Measure C projects and the community funding. And so this is intended to update council on the revised budget after we We took that council feedback and inputted it, and then kind of reiterate where we're at. And then the goal what we're hoping for is to get a couple of decisions to then finalize the budget and come back at the next meeting with a final budget for adoption. So I will briefly talk about kind of where we were at as we went through the process Overall, it's actually I'd say good news.

We reported at the May 11th meeting and at the budget committee meeting prior to that that we had a expected deficit of about $150,000 if certain revenues didn't improve that we would need to close this gap of $150,000 That was based on expecting about $9.8 million or almost $9,900,000 in revenue which would be up from this current year we're in which has dropped all the way to about $8.6 million which I think we're expecting right now and are fairly confident to say that this should be the worst year impacted by COVID.

So it'd be up from there, but it's still down from pre-COVID where we were actually over $11 million in revenue. And so we had projected kind of a middle ground here. Now, the positive news is that there have been several positive changes to those numbers. Some were as a result of the council discussion and then some were just as a result of taxes or property tax revenue and things like that coming in stronger than we expected.

These are the changes that we inputted We revised the property tax because we actually received the payment after that meeting and the payment came in higher than expected. So, we reflected that in the revised numbers. We increased the cannabis tax revenue because we issued a permit to the first cannabis distributor right as we were coming to council The redistricting bid that we brought to council and the council approved came in under budget. So we were able to reduce that cost from our first proposed budget.

We had one go the other way, which is our insurance bill came in higher than expected due to some increased rates for the liability and workers comp insurance. We included in the revised budget, the new city attorney's contract which was... I'm sorry not new but the amended city attorney's contract which was approved earlier tonight. So that is now reflected accurately in the budget and we based on the council feedback which there were questions at that meeting about if we could increase the use of the restricted fund balance for paid fees for some of those costs, and we went back and we could do that. So we did increase those which also helped offset the deficit.

And then some minor adjustments just moving cost from one place to another. That didn't really impact but we wanted to note that so that if you're comparing the two and you see a number change a little bit that some of those were just us correcting and moving things from one line item to another more accurately So all of those things that stem from that last meeting resulted in a revised budget that has a little bit of additional revenue because of the property tax and cannabis tax.

And that helped to close the gap to where the deficit right now as we are speaking is $24,514 is what we anticipate. The one really important thing to note on that is that right now these two columns, the two totals for this year and next year include the Rescue Act funding $650,000 per year. So if we don't receive that which we don' have reason to believe we won't but if we don't receive that we'd have to...

This number would actually be reduced $650,000 or This number could be reduced $650,000 which would change the picture pretty dramatically. But as of this afternoon we asked for an update and they said it's coming so we don't anticipate that but it's just one important caveat. So if we receive that $650,000 in funding then we actually will have a small surplus at the end of this year that'll help us start to rebuild our reserves from their low point And in our proposed budget, which is before council for discussion. We would end up at a $24,000 deficit for next year.

Now additionally we talked about CIP and measure C I'm sorry. And so the good news there is measure C which went into effect right as COVID started During this year, we've been able to start to build that funding up that will allow us to do paving and some other important projects. As of the end of June, we're expecting that there will be $750,000 in that Measure C fund.

Not what we were hoping originally but it's going to provide some funding so that we can do some of these projects and we have been able to do some projects this year and we'll still have 750,000 available And so what we are showing here is that by next year, and after we do $1.3 million in projects which is shown on the next slide will actually end that year with about $800,000 in that fund.

So the good news there is that means if a project or an opportunity comes up during the year That we wouldn't have been able to afford before. With Measure C, we can actually afford to jump on some of those projects and obviously those would come back to council and be approved separately but it's finally starting to see the real positive impact of Measure C and what it can do.

And when we said that this budget includes $1.3 million in projects, these are the projects that we propose to fund through Measure C. We went through these last week but just quickly, $630,000 for paving to help us catch up on our backlog there, $265,000 for an electric trolley and electric public works cart, $122,000 $90,000 for enhanced code compliance services. $83,000 for city facility improvements. $80,000 for the fiber optic broadband and then some additional funding I won't go line item by line item for the Sarzotti court multi-court sport courts which is basketball and that indoor soccer called futsal.

The Seward Canyon project and some other miscellaneous items so Those are all projects including paving, which with the impacts of COVID if we hadn't had Measure C would have had to just be deferred. But we're expecting to be able to do all these things next year using Measure C funds. Capital improvement projects very similar to Measure C so I won't go into them in super detail but the important thing is that $1.3 million in Measure C funding Allows us to leverage those funds and get grants and just leverage for other funding opportunities.

And our capital improvement projects will total approximately $3.8 million. So using that $1.3 million of City Measure C funding, we're able to actually deliver $3,800,000 in improvements. That is a big advantage of having the Measure C funds available. Actually, just prior to this meeting at about 530, we were told that the electric trolley, which is about 80% of it would be funded by congressional funding And they told us earlier today at about 530 that that looks very likely to get approved. So again, that's a case where they had said we would fund the big chunk of your electric trolley if you guys have a little bit of money to match it. And whereas if we hadn't had Measure C, we probably would've said we just don't have the money this year but we were able to actually save it.

Assuming City Council approves, we'll be able to match that so good news on that front. Some changes that we made to the CIP based on council feedback. The last slide was all the information we already presented, but some changes that we made after that discussion was... We included, you'll see two categories here, the City Hall campus improvements and ongoing funding for City Hall campus improvements.

One of those is for this year. The other is we're putting this into the CIP for the upcoming years What those two are is that we've talked a lot of times at council recently about kind of the vision of the city hall campus and the need to actually start really maintaining and making some improvements here. So, um, we realized as after the CIP meeting and we had a campus meeting on some things on the campus, uh, we realized that we haven't had any funding for that.

And it's going to be very difficult to really Accomplish anything without some funding. So just to start getting us thinking that way, we are recommending to include $60,000 in this year's budget and $40,000 as kind of a placeholder in the coming years with the idea that right now no improvement has actually been approved. We would come back to council when some improvements have been identified But I think we all have seen over the last couple years, there have been opportunities to do things and we don't have any funding for them. So we wanted to just build that into the CIP.

We also added the Sarzadi Park trash enclosure modification. We put in $25,000 but we actually in the last couple days Came up with some ideas that would actually be a lot less than that. But right now in the CIP, we've built that into this fiscal year to match the timing of the multi-sport courts and to be able to do all that work at the same time. We also built in $10,000 into next, the 22-23 budget so not this year but the following year.

$10,000 with the idea of earmarking funding for e-bike charging stations. We're looking into what exactly that would look like but we know that is a question that I think a lot of people have been getting so we're starting to at least think about that and put it into our CIP. And then the other two things we added based on that council discussion were the bathrooms at our city hall campus, which is about a $180,000 estimate. And then and that's in fiscal year 23-24 at this point.

And then we have Boyd Center solar panels for 24-25 and we have 185,000 at this point for that project. We do have solar panels for the city hall site included in this year, but this was just what was added after the last discussion. And I think I see a question and it's actually question time

1:02 – 1:1524 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:02:00

so. Can you go back to that? I guess I can probably do it from memory. It's here. The electric charging stations, I looked into that and I discussed it with Kelly because all the people I know with electric bikes we charge them at home. And there are hundreds of models and very few usually you figure out how far you can go on your charge it varies but and you can pace it so that you can go really far like 50 miles If you don't use the super high charge, if you're careful how you use it.

And I think that my opinion is based on everything that I know about e-bikes and what Kelly told me because people come into his shop and they just go in the back and charge their bike And most people could, if you're carrying your charger which hardly anyone does because they're usually heavy. And the charging stations that do where charging stations work is when you have an electric fleet that you may be renting out and everybody has the same charging need but I think that it's premature to have, I don't know what the thinking was to put that into the budget but I recommend removing it.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:04:03

James, in my quick calculation that insurance bill estimate is up 22% year-to-year? That

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:04:11

should be about right. I think it was $300,000 and it went up $60,000, I think.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:04:16

Yeah well yeah so a $65,000 increase. Yeah so that should be about 20%. And you said that was driven primarily by workman's compensation claims and are any of those jurisdiction specific or is that just the general pool?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:04:31

So some of the increase was general pool, but there was some increase for specifically for us. And without getting into details part of we had a discussion with them. Part of the increase is because they base a lot of their costs on what your essentially what your payroll was two to three years prior and we had a year A couple years back where we had several high-level staffing changes, and because of that it essentially made the payroll look higher than it actually was. We met with them and had that conversation but they're It's essentially their policy, they're basing it on that. What they're saying is next year we should expect to see a reduction because it would go back to normal. The actuarial formula will reflect that with the lag? Yeah exactly.

So we tried to haggle with them but we should see it. It should be a one-year increase and it should start to reduce after that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:05:42

Thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:05:42

Randy question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:05:44

I have three questions Mayor. James, are you thinking about increasing your maintenance staff to create a position for the back end of City Hall in the future? That would be one question. The second question on the trolley a purchase. I saw that the grant fund was $440,000 out of the $550,000 and did you account for the $110,000 differential in our budget? And do we have the capabilities of charging a vehicle that size Or is that something that we would plan for in our CIP?

And then on the e-bike, I see that again as something happening in the future and seeing how we have very limited bike path capacity. Should we be thinking about something with the County Recreation and Parks in conjunction with our own city for future charging stations

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:06:52

Okay. Yeah, good questions. I'll go through them in order before I forget them. So regarding the campus there's a couple of things we're looking to do which is one is we had created that position that was going to be managing events including the volunteer events and it was going to be the event coordinator and the public information officer. That position Proposed to be funded in this budget that's before you. So, that will help with that and then also we're looking at some things like converting one of the part-time public works positions to a full time position and those things will also provide some more staff coverage. So that's part of the plan.

Thank you for Oh, the electric vehicle trolley. I'm sorry. The electric trolley. So the $110,000 is included in this proposed budget as being funded for Measure C because it is a climate-related project of allowing us to go to electric. One really exciting thing about it is that that funding is proposed to cover installing the charger as well So that opens up the door for us to eventually down the line, get more electric trolleys once we build up some funding.

That $110,000 of Measure C lets us leverage to get potentially the trolley and the charger in it. And like I said just today, I was told that it's looking very promising. Both of those should result from that without any additional impact on the budget over what's already being shown And then last, the electric bike chargers. Yes I think one point I'll note is we didn't build that in for this year so Council has the choice to remove it but it's also not something we're planning to do this year. It would be projected out so we also don't have to necessarily decide right now But I think that's a good point. We've reached out to County Recreation on partnering with them on a couple of ideas, and that's one that would make a lot of sense with the bike trail being county-city partnerships.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:09:19

Perfect.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:09:20

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:23

Susan, question? Yeah, three questions. I don't want to sound like a broken record but the benches are very important especially for our older population And people who can't afford a car that are slipping groceries for quite a long distance. So does that go here? Or is it depend on like if it's on Maricopa, is that part of the ATP? How does that work?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:09:50

Are you thinking, are you referring to like the trolley stop benches or benches?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:56

Yeah but benches in general-

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:09:58

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:10:00

If it's a known route and there's no place Someone to sit. You know, I would like to you know it's part, you know we do people parking bike parking and car parking and people parking should be right up, you know just as much of a priority. And that way we'll get more people walking because instead of it being an ordeal, it becomes enjoyable. You can visit with people, you can relax and enjoy the scenery. It's more important than I think we realize. And I think I'm more aware of it since I'm getting old. So

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:10:35

we have the two trolley stops? In the budget and I noted those locations last meeting, but I'm blanking on them right now. But we have the two trolley stops. We don't necessarily have other benches so what I could do is first question that I'll report back on is I'll find out from Public Works if there is a plan to install any benches and then if not then there's still the opportunity It's a great opportunity for council if there is a majority to add some funding for benches in the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:11:10

CIP. question I have asked over the years is some kind of water play in Libbey Park as soon as we have the funding? Otherwise you will just have all the kids gathering in the fountain again, it's inevitable. And it doesn't even Misters that are usually, they're so used that they're half the time broken down. Yeah maybe we need another mister that was that is so popular in the

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:11:44

yeah that's what I was just gonna say is I thought we had fixed them Fix the misters right before COVID. But I guess we'll take a look at those if they're working and then...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:11:54

They break down a lot, but yeah so maybe we need another one back up one. And okay and so the trolley benches that includes the shade covers? Yeah what you mean? Okay I think that's all I have.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:12:12

Any other questions? Public comment on this item Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:12:17

Yes, we have four public speakers. I will bring in the first one is Brian Akins. Brian you should be able to speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak.

PresenterBrian AkinsOjai VaProposedself-stated1:12:33

Hello my name is Brian Akins. It's about the day in Santa Maria and we arrived just as you went to this item number five. My name is again Brian Akins. I'm current president of the Ojai Valley Museum For the last 10 years, I've also been treasurer so I know the in's and out's of the museum. Eight years ago we came to the Ohio City Council with a request for support. Were they our first choice? No, our last just before having to close our doors. We have spent many meetings evaluating over the years every potential in and out federal state county, and finally city. One told had been a museum financial supporter prior to the end shutting down for a length of time.

Let me just address the observations made by Mayor Sticks in the May 11th meeting. We look at ourselves not as a startup looking for seed capital, but as a full partner with the city of Ojai. In other words we consider ourselves real time partners as the City of Ojais Museum. We believe and sincerely feel we are the gem of the Ojai Valley visually. The city's heart, soul, historical vault and share of cultures past and current. We're constantly fundraising to keep our doors open We at times feels though we are one vote away from closing our doors as we were eight years ago.

To prevent our closing, we're always on the lookout for bringing funds in always. In these last two years, we brought in PPP1, PPP2 a $15,000 grant 5k grant. We're constantly looking at clocks moving really fast. We spent this year past year, Two appeals we did a mid year appeal in July, we did an annual peer appeal at the end of the year. Our members were fabulously generous and their support and we actually raised 10k in this year over what we did in the prior year to help us in our solicitations branch out we brought in Stephen Hitchcock A professional writer, he helped us with our invitation for the annual appeal. He also helped us put the legacy program in effect. Legacy program worked so well that we had a wonderful couple who decided to not wait until they had passed away and to go ahead and donate $5,000 now.

We're grateful to them for doing that. As for corporate contributions, we're always looking for sponsors. For our current exhibit, we had sponsorship of $3,900. Many of those funds came from Our board members who were tipping in their money to support it. We have a floor on Fauna, a time for climate change coming in at the end of the year. We're already looking for corporate sponsors for that.

In closing, we are not a nonprofit like the Chamber of the Fire Council. Fine groups that they are. To us, to the council, to the community, we are the City of Ojai's Ojai Valley Museum. When folks are cleaning up after COVID or sadly locating where they're here in the valley or moving away when they find something historic, something priceless in their family that they want cherished, they seek the Ojai Valley Museum. We thank you for your support.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:15:36

Thank you so much, Brian.

1:15 – 1:207 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:15:42

Next we have Wendy Barker. Wendy, you should be able to speak if you're muted please go ahead and unmute yourself it looks like you're unmuted Wendy you can go ahead

PresenterWendy BarkerOjai Valley Museum We're all coming out of a very tough timeProposedself-stated1:15:53

hey good evening mayor and council members I'm Wendy Barker director of the Ojai Valley Museum We're all coming out of a very tough time. Pandemic rules prohibited museums, even small ones like ours from being open for most of the past year. Although our doors were closed for many months, our small staff remained busy behind the scenes. We began putting our major exhibitions online which is a permanent change to how we operate.

We assisted researchers, reporters and community members with requests for historic information. The museum continued to protect and of course to preserve artifacts photographs and archival material about Ojai. Additional articles were added to ohihistory.com every month and our collection expanded to include images and objects about the pandemic so we can tell the story of COVID-19 life to future generations.

That's the heart of what the museum does, we share Ojai stories We were thrilled to reopen again April 2nd. We keep a cart stocked with maps, brochures and magazines available outside and we look forward to also being able to reopen the visitor center. I am proud of the job that your local museum is doing to collect preserve and share Ojai's interesting history art and culture with our community and with visitors from around the world.

I trust that you are proud of your museum too We really appreciate the city's past financial support and hope that we can continue to count on you. This is a unique city in an amazing valley with your help, we will continue to share it with local residents and the world. Thank you very much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:17:50

Next speaker, Gail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:17:52

Next we have Bill Miley. Bill Miley if you're there go ahead you can uh if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated1:18:00

speak. Sure Bill Miley um my pages are mixed up just a minute okay um this is all about supporting funding for the art commission which has done well Council, the museum and the chamber. For a start, the request from community which I include the art commission represents about 2.3% of our budget which is something but not a lot. The three community organizations plus our art commission are all building future-oriented efforts which is really important and I like that.

Can you hear me?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:18:48

Yes.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated1:18:49

Okay, here's more detail of the $240,000 being requested. We've already allocated 50,000 as open dollars and 32 to the Arts Commission. Leaving about 158 less done. I've looked for a bunch of places and found only one, that's the measure state under climate mitigation emission reductions $265,000 which we spent this year too. And I don't know what that is. So I'd like to see the wildfire council given money from the emissions reduction. I would like to see the museum get to $50,000 And then I would like to see that the chamber, which is doing contract work for the city as part of a memorandum of agreement, which is a multi-year goal.

Get money from someplace but I don't know where. The chamber's helping to build a better economy I see it as a must-needed item to be Welfare gets money from Climate C. 50%, $50,000 goes to the museum and the chamber gets money someplace. But I would like to see the chamber funded as part of the first draft of every budget as well as a museum so I don't think they should have to beg every year.

Last request is a summary. Keep the art commission viable, keep the museum sound and city historical, fund the wildlife council for the first time especially for their plan to use grazing goats, continue the focus community building by the chamber for their known accomplishments and their good leadership. Thanks.

1:21 – 1:268 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:21:02

Thank you Mr. Miley. All right next speaker Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:21:06

Next we have Tony Thatcher. Tony, if you're there you should be able to speak. If you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and talk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:21:17

Thank you for receiving me. I'd first like to apologize to the mayor for misspelling her name especially since not long ago one of the girls softball teams here in the valley named themselves The Pixie Sticks spelled just like your name You have already received in your packet, I believe a statement from me asking you to again financially support the Ojai Valley Museum.

Your past support has made up plus or minus 20% of what the museum uses to survive on a year-to-year basis. The rest coming primarily from the generosity of the valley's citizens. A generation ago, your predecessors were prescient enough to purchase the iconic now nationally recognized building and lease it to the then named Ojai Valley Historical Society. Many citizens of this valley have worked diligently for many years to turn it into what is now the Ojai Valley Museum.

This is their and your, and your grandchildren's heritage of Valley history and culture. It is a repository of our collective memory artifacts important and not so important works of art written documents, newspapers, and ephemera oral and video reminiscences all available for viewing and research So who should be responsible for this cultural collection? This perseverance of preservation.

Who should spend time, effort and coin to display and explicate our collective heritage? All of us, of course is this old residence rejoinder. And that ladies and gentlemen includes you To me, it is a simple lesson in civics to preserve your past. And I thank you again for your consideration.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:23:32

Thank you, Tony.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:23:38

Any more speakers, Gail? No, that's the last one.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:23:42

OK, thank you. OK moving on to discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:23:52

Mayor, two things. One is I want to commend the staff for essentially a balanced budget. I want to point out that a $24,500 projected deficit is 0.23% of the overall operating budget. That for all intents and purposes is within the margin of error when you're doing budgeting. I did budgeting for years, if you're plus or minus 1%, you're golden. So I think we ought to look at this as essentially balanced when we are talking about 0.23% of the operating budget for a deficit.

I'll have more to speak later on the community projects but just to say one comment about Bicycle charging stations, which I really think of as personal mobility vehicles. We talk about promoting automobile charging stations, e-vehicle charging stations for automobiles. More and more as I read about the future people are going to be using personal mobility vehicles for commuting longer distance trips and I think our infrastructure should reflect that.

You know, I think we want to encourage and we're not talking about just necessarily e-bikes but also the innovations in personal mobility vehicles are coming fast and furious to coin up an old phrase. And when we are, I think we oughta be looking forward that I was just trying to advocate that we put this keep it in the budget as a placeholder for the future just to analyze it and think about it Because we talk about, we don't want cars coming into the valley. Well what about people being encouraged to park down in large parking lots in Ventura like at the fairgrounds and bring their personal mobility vehicle or e-bike into Ojai if they want to visit us so they don't drive up here? That long haul, they're going to want to have a place to plug in and I don't think that they should be expected to have to go to a private business, there ought to be a public available option.

So if we're really serious about moving in the direction of encouraging cars to be less and for people to look at alternatives to cars I think we need to look at the infrastructure support for that so that was my motivation.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:26:23

Randy and then Susan?

1:26 – 1:3614 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:26:28

I had one question for James, but I'll wait a little further on. Okay. Susan? I'd

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:26:33

like to comment. Bill, I'm all for what you just described. I think it's going to take some research because we don't need charging stations for personal e-bikes. I think what you're looking at is more of an e-bike rental or Like I tried to say, there are hundreds of models and there's no one size fit all charging station that I'm aware of. But- Yeah, okay. I just want to make clear because we don't charge people with e-bikes that you don't charge your bike on the bike trail for example. You would charge it at a restaurant or a bookshop or at a friend's house. You can plug it in anywhere. It's not complicated. I can charge my bike at anyone's home and then go 50 miles I just want to make sure that's understood. Once you have an e-bike, you'll see how easy it is.

It's very simple. It doesn't require any kind of a charging station. Are we going to go through these items? Is that the plan and make comments or what's...

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:27:58

Well, we're discussing it. Ryan, you wanted to make a comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:28:03

Yeah, I just want to say, um, I brought it. I talked to James about this already about the e-bikes and I completely agree Suze and Bill. I agree with the idea but they don't have a common charge. You were talking to James last week when he brought this up because I saw it on there and I'm all for it and I love my e-bike but... James said, well it would only be a situation where you'd have to bring your charger and plug it into a regular outlet. And that makes no sense at all and there's no shortage of regular outlets in lots of places. And frankly we could start having just simple stub outs and strips near Bicycle parking areas. But the problem is that the actual plug in of the different batteries are inconsistent until there becomes a standardized model of what is charging, which it does occur for cars.

It doesn't occur for bikes. I don't know. I'd love to see us have money in there to support the idea. I just don't know how we do it yet to make it work exactly. And you're right, if we had all the exact same model and they were consistent with rental bikes then it would be a little bit different situation. But I do wanna see us do it. It's also this came up at air pollution control district as well and there's just not money out there yet for electric bike charging because there's no consistency. There's gonna have to be some You know, at some point there's some regulatory agency or the government or someone who makes them standard to some extent. But right now every manufacturer is pretty much buying the bike batteries from different manufacturers and they all have different hookups.

I don't know if I want to take the money out. I love it being in there in case we need it. And of course we don't, we can always find something else with it but I don'y want to see us go too early on something and have it not be successful in the way it works. But I think...I love the idea that we're all supportive of it when we can figure out how to do it correctly.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:29:53

Randy, you're next.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:29:58

So again, as anything of this nature it isn't going to happen tomorrow and it's not going to happen the day after. This is easily a three-to-five year project and in that time frame who knows what's going to occur so I concur with what's being said. Again it's a placeholder and this money can be moved at any time for any other need, but it doesn't hurt to have the conversation and it doesn't hurt to have the conversation with other entities.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:30:35

Susan? Could we maybe broaden that sentence and say you know alternative use of term alternative transportation Because it's not just going to be e-bikes, it's going to be those. I see people on the trail, those things that look like stand up. You know you stand on them? What is that called? Maybe there's a term. You can help me out James or Bill.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:31:05

Segway, you mean?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:07

Yeah yeah so it includes everything. Personal mobility vehicles. Non-polluting, you know, alternative personal mobility for the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:31:17

cars. Let's not beat this up too much for just a little bit of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:20

money in the future. Yeah,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:31:24

okay. I have a couple things I'd like to bring up. I'm all for solar. Solar is resiliency. It's not mitigation. So we're spending $180,000 on... No, $140,000 on solar panel when really we need climate mitigation, which means upgrading city infrastructure, switching water and air heating to electric. So I would go for that. And then $185,000 for the Boyd Center solar panels. We already have clean power and so I'd really like to see that go towards climate mitigation The bathroom $180,000 for the bathroom and the city hall campus.

That seems a little expensive. And also as we're shifting on the campus and we don't you know things are sort of up in the air I would say hold off on that. I love the museum. Thank you, Tony, Wendy and Brian for calling in and I totally support that. Obviously museums need constant upgrading and modernization. It's the 21st century so specifically the Chumash exhibit needs from my opinion some updates.

It's not personal. It's hold on one second, the Chamber of Commerce make is asking for $102,000 a year. I've asked for the budget three times I was told twice yes never got it third time no response and I would have met you know they're the chamber has an assistant that's got to be at least 30,000 the chamber has a an office that's got to be so half the budget is going to overhead which means office and assistant.

Seems more reasonable to me that it's an actual position at city hall, that's accountable where a person is hired and is managed. And for example this what's come up recently we all got emails from the chamber about this moratorium on businesses. I don't know if y'all were able to read it cause it came in pretty late. That's something that you have somebody who's in the office And working on it, there's you know the communication is right there. So, and also number one thing James let's get you up to back to your salary 100% that's ridiculous you work so many hours of course you need to come back to 100% of your salary so um and then in terms of the fire safe council.

They have applied for the same grant. This is the fifth time they've applied for it they didn't get it the first four times so I would opt to wait and see what happens if they get it. It was confusing why they didn't end up being at the emergency preparedness day because everybody else was there, so that seemed... I'm not sure what happened. And we have Bob Roper who is volunteering to help us to make a plan, so that's huge. So I would like to see those changes.

Susan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:54

Okay, good question. Do we have to make a final decision on all three of these items, these bullet points, Ojai Valley Museum Chamber? I'm ready to make a decision on the Ojai Valley Museum. I have questions about the chamber and one question would be what would it cost if you had a staff position an assistant manager type position that did all or some of the work that the chamber does, that we start thinking in another direction. Could you come back with a report on that? And could we decide that item on June 22nd, the funding of the chamber because that's such a big chunk.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:35:42

Yeah and so the final adoption is scheduled for June 22nd. So no final decisions have to be made tonight. I can provide in the next staff report just a comparison of the costs. I think the real question would be what level of position, because you could have a full-on economic development director that would be very expensive or you can just have a manager who also does economic development.

We can provide that information to council of what those costs look like. But to answer the first question, the decisions don't have to be made tonight. They could be made on June 22nd. But the more guidance at this point for us to put that final budget together, the better. And then just to answer one other comment is the bathrooms at the campus I do agree. I think it's a little early to be building them, so we proposed putting them in the fiscal year 23-24, so they're not in this year or even next year's budget would be three years out.

1:36 – 1:4310 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:36:56

Randy? So James there's a one time transfer of 6% of the TOT am I correct and it's $178,000 Correct. So we could, we don't have that's not a mandatory transfer. We can hold back that transfer. We could cover the expenses of the museum. We could cover the expenses of the chamber. We could cover the expenses of the fire emergency and do that now and come back next year in a more deliberative fashion And think about if we want to create an economic development position in our community and find out what that would cost. I think it's a little late in the game between now and the 22nd to actually decide if we're going to do that position or not, so we have a funding mechanism we can get through this year's budget with it And we can come back in next year and start thinking about these positions, I think in a better manner rather than trying to subject ourselves to something in 20 days or 15 days.

So that's my thoughts. There is a funding source there and we could choose to do that. We could fund all of those positions. And if it's 178 and it looks like we're 100 and what 58,000 So we'd have $20,000 left over that you could apply to your deficit. So now you're only carrying a 4,000 which according to bill I think is 0.002 or 3% of the budget. That's my offer to this table. Could we look into and I love solar on the other hand

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:38:53

You know, it's under climate mitigation and solar is resiliency which is beautiful. If we're going to do mitigation, it has got to be can we use that money to upgrade the city? Making it

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:39:12

electric. That's within Council's authority if right now The 140,000 proposed for solar panels. So if there's consensus we can modify that to remove that and instead put in the... I think it would be electrification of... It sounds like maybe like electrification of HVAC for example so.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:39:38

Ryan? This

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:39:40

is one

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:39:40

of the problems with going all electric, electricity costs that we reviewed a number of times because it went up so much

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:39:51

Did you read the report from the climate committee about the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:39:57

cost? I've read it three times now, and I don't believe that it's cheaper all the time. And we've had massive increases in electricity costs here specifically because we went to All renewable resources and we've reviewed that a number of times, how much it accelerated exponentially really. I mean, it went up with time. And I think that solar seems like it would both be resilient and climate effective and also cost-effective.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:40:33

Well, it's not mitigation, you know? It's resiliency. Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:40:39

Yeah. I mean, this is a useful discussion because part of having decentralized solar with battery local backup is you get both. You get the mitigation and resiliency because in the event of more frequent grid outages which are going to happen since Edison delivers Community Power Alliance, they're the distributors for it. So you're subject to all of the outages that are increasingly in frequency plus if you were able to do solar with local backup for your city facilities, you can save money on the cost of electric power because you can bridge between peak and off-peak as well as having the inherent backup So in other words, this thing could properly design. This thing can literally pay for itself. I know the city of Camarillo is doing this.

I don't think it's either or the way that you're characterizing it Mayor Sticks. Also there are proposals out there right now where we might be able to do some kind of an interagency purchase power agreement with the city and other agencies in the Valley We were too small to generate interest for a Purchase Power Agreement just with the city. But if we have a joint agreement with other agencies, we might be able to get into a situation where we don't have to do the upfront capital costs.

So I think there's different angles on this but I also think that to not look at... To be completely dependent on centralized power distribution is inherently unstable and less resilient, plus the ability to do time of day to move your load from peak to off-peak is an important element of having your local solar and battery backup. So I think it's in a future budget year, and I guess I just think there's There's a lot of more nuanced angles to look at this than just whether or not we get from a renewable centralized source through a long distance grid system. There are advantages to decentralized, and in fact that's where the world seems to be increasingly going is more and more of a decentralized generation and backup system to supplement the centralized system.

So I think they complement one another.

1:43 – 1:4935 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:43:36

Any other comments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:43:38

Well, so the quick mayor. So the question again these are some of these discussions again or they're not in this fiscal year there and two or three down the road. So once again they're technically placeholders which can be discussed in the future modified moved however we choose to do it. The short impact is actually the you know quick the the short term is actually getting these buildings solarized and getting back up to them as fast as we can regarding what Councilman Weirich's talking to I'm going to bring up some more information like that when we get to the climate discussion because there are things that we can be doing with joint power agreements with other agencies throughout this, throughout the Ojai area of influence. So I'm not going to talk about that now but um i don't know how you want to proceed do we want to like Susan said do we want to vote something down, vote something in.

How do we choose to do it? Like I said i'm looking at the six percent TOT transfer of 178 is not doing that year and doing that to support the three agency requests the museum um the uh where are we here the Ojai Valley Chamber and the Ojai Valley Fire Safe Council. So I don't know how you would like to do that, do we need a vote on that? How do we choose to do that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:15

Susan? Well, I suggest from my perspective that we vote on the... I think we have consensus on the Ojai Valley Museum and I would still like to see James' report even if we end up as Randy suggested, I would like to see the report first Before I feel comfortable to vote for the chamber. Okay, agree where I am.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:45:44

Well that's what you are there's five of us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:47

yeah i'm just saying where I am all right you know okay bill did you want to say something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:45:53

Yeah I was since I think we're It would be an order, and please tell me if I'm not in order that it would be appropriate to make a motion for direction. And I was going to make a motion that we are committed to the funding of the museum for $50,000 and see if there's a second when we get that parameter fixed.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:46:14

I'll second. May we have a vote on that, Gail, please?

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion that we are committed to the funding of the museum for $50,000 and see if there's a second when we get that parameter fixed. I'll sec
Show transcript
Council Member Francina? Yes. Mayor Sticks? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Weirich? Yes Council Member Blatz? Yes Council Member Haney? I'm gonna say yes
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:46:36

but there's a caveat that these should all be worked together, but that's alright. Are we going to do each one the same way right now? It's up to us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:46:44

Randy.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:46:46

Okay so we finished that you said yes Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:46:50

Yes okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:46:52

Yeah, we all have a caveat that I plan to communicate to the museum. Okay.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:46:58

All right. Well, that's done. That's good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47:02

Councilman Haney you had something?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:47:05

So again, I offered that we moved the 6% TOT transfer to CIP, the $178,500 and we use that to cover those three expenses. Do I need a second on that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:47:22

If you wanted to make it a motion to provide that direction to staff, to adjust the draft budget to return next meeting then that would be in order. Motion seconded vote provides that direction and as noted earlier the motion that was just made this motion any subsequent motions are all interim motions to provide direction to city manager to write the budget that will come back next time for actual adoption and could be further modified next time so with motion on the table uh second would be in order if there is support I'll second the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47:51

motion. I hope we have discussion.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:47:57

And to clarify, that would be to fund the fire safe council in the chamber?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:48:02

And the museum.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:03

We

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:03

already voted on the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:48:05

museum. It's a direction

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:10

motion. But the final decision is made next meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:48:16

All final decisions on the budget will be made next meeting. Are we in discussion now on the

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:21

motion? We're waiting for a second. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:48:25

sorry, Mayor Pro Tem Weirich provided the second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:28

Okay all right then we can have a vote on this well don't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:48:32

we have discussion maybe

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:34

go ahead

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:48:36

okay do we know what the Operational plan is for the proposed money for the Fire Safety Council. I was wondering what information we have? I saw the paperwork, and I saw percentages. Is that the information we have from the Fire Safety Council, what we submitted?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:48:57

Yes. The information that we have in total is attachment E to the report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:03

OK. And that was the percentages applied

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:49:07

into

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:08

that totals, right? Yes And they have their taxpayer identifier information submitted. And

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:49:18

that's in effect and approved? OK. Yeah, and we'll confirm that between now and then. They've submitted it, but we'll confirm that that's in effect. And then just to kind of answer I think the question you were getting to is, in the paperwork they noted that their annual budget as an organization is estimated at $250,000, and they were requesting $50,000 from the city.

1:49 – 1:5221 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:42

Okay, so that's roughly if that's the money they're bringing in over and above the request. That's a similar ratio to the museum's ratio in terms of total budget to support that they're asking for right?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:49:55

Yeah 20% yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:57

okay thank you mayor I just wanted to clarify that in my mind

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:50:04

James will you get a budget from the chamber for next meeting?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:50:10

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:10

we could ask them for

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:50:11

the budget

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:14

I

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:50:14

would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:21

say that if this motion passes, I'm not sure we'd want to do a lot of staff time. On exploring bringing in-house, it is worthy of noting what that might mean but I wouldn't want to spend a lot of staff time on it partly for the reasons that Councilman Haney was mentioning. of a short time frame it's more of a longer term review. But anyway I just want to make that comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:50:52

Out of curiosity what would the chamber members do? Pay the city, be a member of the city? Yeah that's one of the questions I have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:51:01

Oh! Susan can't you have a A chamber of commerce that's funded by the business owners? No, the business would not pay the city.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:51:21

There wouldn't be a chamber right there would be an in-house person.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:51:25

Actually if you do a little research chambers were developed in the late 1800s as a fraternal organization and from what I've read from the research a lot of cities don't have them anymore It's just not a thing. So, Randy,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:51:43

are we gonna vote?

Roll-call vote Passed 3–1 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Let's vote. Gail may we have the roll call please? Mayor Pro Tem Wyrick? Yes. Mayor Sticks? No. Council Member Blatz? Yes Council Member Haney? Yes Council Member Francina?
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:52:06

Great. Let's it's nine o'clock, how about we take a five minute health break and then we'll come back for the next item? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:17

I call it the senior citizen plumbing break.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:20

Yeah.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:52:21

A stretch break. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:24

I'm going to have an uncle get Eddie's vegan cookie.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:52:45

What happened?

1:58 – 2:0617 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:58:29

Everybody ready? Come back. Thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:58:34

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:58:34

Brian, are you there? Here. Okay. All right. Let's end the session. Moving along to number six please James.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:58:56

Yeah thank you and Just quickly on December 10th, 2019 the city approved a charter for a climate emergency mobilization committee. The charter is included as the attachment to the staff report. The charter had identified that the committee in order to move quickly and meet quickly that the committee would operate as an ad hoc committee for six months so that the committee would not have to follow the Brown Act because it would be an ad hoc working group.

The committee proceeded in that manner and held a public workshop on Saturday, January 25th as kind of the kickoff. And then in June of 2020, the Climate Committee provided an interim report The City Council extended that ad hoc committee status at that time through January 12, 2021 to allow the Committee to continue its work. The Committee provided a report at the January 12th, 2021 meeting. At that time, the City Council extended the duration of the Committee an additional six months And so six months from that date was July 12th, because we were planning to cancel the July 12 meeting. We are providing this item at this time where we're at five months into this third extension.

And so essentially the item is before the council again at this time to review the charter and the protocols and identify if there's any modifications to be made The staff report includes options for council. As we noted the last time, they're the identical options but as we noted the last time from a staff perspective, the general rule is that once an ad hoc committee exceeds six months it's good practice to require it to be a public group pursuant to the Brown Act Council has options to choose not to do that, but that is the typical rule that we follow.

Council could continue to classify the committee as an ad hoc committee and extend the term to a date certain, but the more we extend that the more legal risk that there is especially as it has extended for coming up on 18 months. So the council could choose to continue it as an ad hoc, could choose to identify it as a standing committee and require compliance with the Brown Act.

Or could choose to modify anything else about the charter or bylaws that the city council would choose to do. So I think with that, the one thing I will, well, I noted is that the typical rule would be once you exceed six months it becomes a standing committee. So that is the typical recommendation. So with that, the item, the charter and bylaws of the Ad Hoc Climate Emergency Committee are before the City Council for review in any modification that the city council desires. So I'm happy to answer any questions.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:02:24

Matt has your hand up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:02:26

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. Mayor and Council my advice to you my recommendation at this time is that the Climate Emergency Committee be turned made into a full Brown Act committee for two reasons one it has existed now in an ad hoc status for 18 months or 18 months in a month so 17 months to do yet another extension relying on an ad hoc status starts to stretch the bounds of defensibility And my recommendation is that if it is to continue, it should be converted or designated as a full Brown Act committee. And for those who may not be familiar with what that means to be a Brown Act committee, it means really three things.

One, that as we're already doing the meetings are in public and they'll continue to be in public and at the right time they'll probably move to in-person but they could remain in Zoom. Two, it means that the public be provided an opportunity to comment at every meeting I believe that is already being done and that would continue. It might get more regularized into a public comment session rather than a pure workshop format, but I'll leave that to the committee to sort of structure themselves as long as all members of the public are provided an opportunity to comment without any discrimination as to viewpoint. And then three it would mean that the agenda must be set in advance. 72 hours for a regular meeting, 24 hours for a special meeting and the discussion topics must be limited to those on the agenda.

Agendas can be written broadly so that's not a straitjacket as much as some may seem my recommendation there is that the Brown Act status is at this point strongly recommended to ensure continued defensibility of this committee against potential challenge happy to answer any questions thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:04:14

Thank you, Matt. Susan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:16

Two questions. Whatever we decide tonight does not go into effect until the six month ends mid-June or July is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:04:29

That would be Council's choice. Yeah council could decide to make it effective now if were that the council choice.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:38

Okay, all right. And the second question is, you know the committee has been accused, wrongly accused in my opinion of breaking the Brown Act. How can a committee that's not a Brown Act Committee break the Brown Act? How can they even be accused of that because their meetings were publicly noticed there was many members of the public attended, the meetings were recorded So, but even besides that they're not a Brown Act committee. So how can they break the Brown Act?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:05:16

I'm not entirely sure what the nature of the accusations have been raised against the committee are speaking generally As noted, as I went through and as you just noted most of what the Brown Act requires is already being done by this committee. The really the only difference is sticking to an agenda and having that agenda published at least in advance 24 hours for a special meeting 72 for a regular meeting that seems to be the difference and as to a potential violation of the Brown Act there's none There is not yet a violation of the Brown Act, but to continue would raise the risk of a violation.

And it really stems from its existence as a committee outside or presently partially outside of the Brown Act, as opposed to any particular incident of which at least I'm aware although I don't attend every meeting or any meetings.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:03

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:06:04

you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:06:04

for that. Any other questions? Okay, we'll move on to public comment and I'd like to have Jim Selman speak first please Gail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:06:16

Okay let me find him there he is

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:06:22

thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:06:25

Jim Selmon you should be able to speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and talk now.

2:06 – 2:147 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:06:32

Good evening everyone thank you Madam Mayor first of all i want to say that I'm speaking for the committee And as you know and stated, James stated our committee term expires in middle of July. We had hoped to have this conversation with the council closer to the end of our term. However we were put on tonight's agenda and have not had time to really prepare anything.

We will and do intend however, to submit a final report with policy language for the general plan of our recommendations and an update The status of the G8, the greenhouse gas inventory. We've hoped and we still believe that the climate emergency can unite people everywhere and inspire Ojai to be a model for the kind of aligned action that's called for at this particular time.

As you know, we were created as a working group to advise the council on what Ojai can and should do to mitigate greenhouse gases, and also what OHAI can do as an act of leadership in its larger context of the region, Ventura County, and the state. As we have stressed repeatedly in earlier meetings, we are a working group, an extension of the staff, and are not a deliberative body, and have no authority to implement our recommendations, and that we've complied with your requests for inclusion of the public in our deliberations.

However, we do not believe that we can continue to be effective as you need us to be if we are compelled to operate under the letter of the Brown Act. Consequently, to save your time and unnecessary discussions, we are declaring our work to be complete at the end of this term and the committee to be dissolved and are ending our participation in any Our final report and the status of the greenhouse inventory will be submitted to the council by July 15th.

We want to thank the council and thank you, and the many, many citizens who've contributed to our being able to make the contribution that we've made. And we do want to let you know that we intend to continue as a citizen action group committed to mitigating greenhouse gases in our valley and in our area. And that we intend to expand our group beyond the existing committee, to include other individuals who bring particular expertise to this particular problem. So again I thank you and we appreciate your support to this point.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:09:28

Thank you Jim much appreciated. All right next and we have 10 more speakers on this item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:09:37

Next we have, let's see, Lee Hindman. I apologize if I'm mispronouncing your name. Lee, if you're there you should be able to speak. Please go ahead and unmute yourself and you can go ahead. Oh, I think I just accidentally muted you. If you could try unmuting yourself again? There, we can hear

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:10:01

you. Okay so thank you mayor and council members for your service after listening to Jim keep in mind I planned this before he spoke but I wanted to say I watched the Ojai Climate Emergency Mobilization Committee meeting of June 2nd and I was really taken aback by several things discussed in the meeting so I have Thank you. Um, some comments and questions first. Um.

Thank you for explaining the ad hoc committee versus the Brown. I had questions about why aren't there representatives on this And the second point I had was the talk about making just having sole electric usage in Ojai versus fossil fuels. And at the meeting it was presented as one sided, instead of having a combination or mixed that it was like. It's either or we're going to be electric or fossil fuels for you know or a combination of those but Why didn't at that committee meeting, they address problems inherent in a single power source system. There wasn't discussion about the realities of cost power outages, you know what to do then the electric goes out and also the primary sources pushing the whole climate emergency narrative.

Instead, it was suggested that the fossil fuel industry has financial motives. Well, they didn't note that the electric companies have the same motives. Thirdly, regarding the claim That we have a climate emergency. One of the committee members cited Vox as a reputable source I looked up box on Wikipedia, quoting from Wikipedia. It says boxes and American News website founded in 2014, it's noted for its explanatory journalism It's described as left of center, anti-conservative and progressive. That's straight out of Wikipedia so that's concerning.

Lastly one of the members of the committee was unspeakably rude and disrespectful to a caller I just could not believe what I was listening to. He claimed absolute fact and firmly established scientific truth in his beliefs, then he cut the collar off. That's not proven as true. There's an equal amount of scientific evidence showing that human usage of fossil fuels is not the primary cause of climate change. This needs more debate and public input.

Please go slowly on this one, thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:13:13

Thank you Leigh. All right next Gail please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:17

Next we have let's see Next we have Phil White. Phil, if you are there, if you could please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak. There, we should be able to hear you. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:13:35

Okay, thank you Gail. Thank you council. I will just agree with Jim Selman's comments that we will not continue After mid-July as an official city committee, but we are still committed to the ideals of addressing climate change. And as Jim said, we intend to continue As a citizens action committee. And so we will, we will still be bringing recommendations to your council well into the future. I will save the rest of my time for the next item where I'll be talking about the reach code. Thank you.

2:14 – 2:1911 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:30

Next we have Colin Jones. Colin if you're there, you can go ahead and speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead. There! We should be able to hear you. Colin are you there? Okay I'm gonna go ahead and mute him again and I'll come back to him

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:14:55

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:56

So next we have, oh he's gone too. It's getting late in the evening people tend to drop off so we don't have him. Colin Jones? Steve Colamea I'll bring in Steve Colomea.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:19

Was after Colin Jones

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:21

who's not there anymore? Michael Shapiro was in the queue earlier, but he's not showing in there right now. Okay thank you. Sure okay uh Steve Colomay you should be able to speak if you're oh you are unmuted so you can go ahead and talk.

CommentSteve ColamezProposed2:15:36

Sure um and I wasn't sure that I was going to say anything at this point. I would like to just address the issue of Brown Act committees and the charge that was given to this particular committee. I am a member of two different Brown Act committees, and in both of those cases, the vast majority of the work is done by staff. And in several cases it's hundreds if not thousands of hours of staff time behind committee meetings where the rest of us are either talking heads or judges, much like the City Council here is.

The charge of this particular committee was a work charge developing a greenhouse gas inventory. I frankly do not know how in the world The engineering design work involved in developing an inventory can be done during a public meeting, it's, it's a staff effort. It's an engineering and scientific effort. The same thing is true of developing climate policies.

We were put in a straitjacket at the point that Council Member Wyrick required that we also have no staff resources. So as far as I'm concerned, that's one of the key reasons why we are really not able to continue, I will say under the yoke of this particular council and I'll leave it at that.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:17:14

Thank you Steve. All right next Gail please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:17:18

Next I will try Colin Jones again. Colin if you're there, if you can unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak. Colin Jones if you're there you can go ahead and speak now. Okay, I'm going to mute him again and I will go to Bill Miley. And then we'll give Colin Jones one more try after that.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated2:17:50

Hello again.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:17:51

Hi, go

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated2:17:52

ahead. My first point to this question is directed by quoting a section of the charter which your council adopted. So on September 10th, 2019, the council discussed the formation of the committee and directed the creation of an ad hoc study committee of short tenure to be comprised of five public members with underlined in bold With knowledge and expertise in climate related issues.

The council directed that the ad hoc committee return to the council with recommendations on a broader city or committee approach to climate emergency, end quotes. So I have Zoomed several of the community meetings and spoke at one considering these folks were chosen for their expertise and not as representatives of our city to collect suggestions from citizens as is done by commissions and the City Council I believe the council is adding to their job way beyond what they were asked to do. I don't see a need to continue public input In fact, as I look back on it, it shouldn't have ever happened.

I suggest that a limited term be set for their final report which I hear now is what's going on not require Brown Act rules or public input as the purpose was to acquire knowledge based on recommendations by folks with expertise in the fields not to collect ideas from the calling public. The calling public have ample opportunity at council meetings so Let's maximize the climate committee membership as experts and let them finish on their own.

Easing their efforts to a final report, thanking them for what they did. And I would like to thank you for considering what I had to say. Bye.

2:19 – 2:265 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:54

Okay, next we have Wendy Larner. Wendy if you're there you can go ahead and speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:20:04

Thank you Gail. Thank you again for allowing me to speak I'd like to again commend to you Stephen Kunin's work in Unsettled he is not a climate change denier nor a QAnon idiot, nor a climate change alarmist. He is I would say best described as a climate change realist and there are many such scientists. He writes in his book Yes, it's true that the globe is warming and that humans are exerting a warming influence upon it. But beyond that to paraphrase the classic movie The Princess Bride I do not think the science says what you think it does The American Physical Society, the professional organization of the country's physicists convened a workshop to stress test the state of climate science with six leading climate experts and six leading physicists.

He was included and he came to these conclusions Humans exert a growing but physically small warming influence on the climate. The deficiencies of climate data challenge our ability to untangle the human influences from poorly understand natural changes." He said again, government and UN press releases and summaries do not accurately reflect the reports themselves There was a consensus at the meeting on some important issues, but not at all the strong consensus the media promulgates.

Distinguished client experts including report authors themselves are embarrassed by the media portrayals of the science. The results from the multitude of client models disagree with or even contradict each other and many kinds of observations. A vague expert judgment, and I say that is put in quotation marks, expert judgment was sometimes applied to adjust model results and obfuscate shortcomings. This again is the cooking the books aspect. In short, the science is insufficient to make useful projections about how the climate will change over the coming decades, much less than affect our actions.

will have on it. Coonan copiously references and relies on widely accepted government documents, I don't think the science says what you think it says. It is perhaps time to hear other voices, perhaps an ad hoc committee on protection of personal and private property rights is in order. And certainly other voices on the science issue. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:23:10

We have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:23:10

another speaker, Gail. We have Anita Hendricks. Anita if you're there you should be able to speak. Oh I think you've got a software situation where I may have to hold let me see. Anita are you there? You should be able to speak can you hear me? So what I'm going to do is some people sometimes have the older Zoom software and they haven't updated it, and the only way I can bring them into the meeting is to temporarily promote them to panelists. So I'll go ahead and do that.

And whoops, there she is okay. Okay. If you're there, can you, Anita? Yes. Okay. You can go ahead and speak.

CommentAnita HendricksProposed2:24:05

Yes. Well the United Nations has done a report on climate change and their assessment is kind of on the conservative side but their conclusion is that we are in danger. So many species have gone extinct You know, we've had unusual climate situations. There is an urgency to address the climate crisis and we really need to step up to the plate on this matter. We've made some progress but we need to do a lot more.

We need to fortify our Climate Council. We need to give them the resources that they need to go beyond We need for them to have access to staff resources, they should be at their disposal. We as a community need to take every action that we can to alleviate climate change as much as it is possible I'm not sure why this has been brought up. I don't know the background on, on this issue in far as the council itself and why it's even being questioned unless that it was initially a short term group but we need to, as a community, we need to go far beyond what we've done and we need to fortify and expand the council and the resources that it has.

So that's my recommendation I wholeheartedly for our own individual, you know here we are talking about COVID. COVID is nothing compared to all the species human plant life forms that are in danger your children your grandchildren nieces nephews the future of humanity and all living creatures is at stake so please do everything you can and more to support any efforts to address the climate issue.

We need a radical change here. Thank you very much, thank you for listening and thank you Climate Change Council for all your efforts.

2:26 – 2:337 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:26:48

All right, next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:49

Gail. Let me check and see if Colin Jones is still... No he's left the meeting so that is all the speakers that we have on this item.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:27:00

Thank you so much Gail. You're amazing appreciate it. Okay Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:27:09

Yeah since Mr. Colomay called me out directly I want to correct the record I did not, I don't have any authority unilaterally to do anything. I'm one member of a council. All I've done is insist that the protocol be followed which is at staff engage in policy development under the direction and per the direction of the majority of this council. And if that's an inappropriate yoking A committee, according to Mr. Calame when all I insisted upon is that we follow normal protocol that we use as a way of managing scarce staff time.

I would simply point out that unfortunately, Mr. Calame has a pattern of misrepresenting facts and situation in pursuit of his advocacy.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:28:14

Anybody else? Discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:28:18

Randy. Well, let's move this forward. It seems like Jim has made it clear that they're abandoning this committee. So what I propose is that we come back in August and discuss what steps we want to take forward into recommitting ourselves to another type of climate committee. And I don't think we need to get into the discussion tonight but I think between now And let's say the end of August or the 1st of September, James that maybe we bring this back and we have a discussion if we want to form another climate committee. And if so what are we looking for in the next venture forward?

Jim and the Climate Group as it exists have made it clear they're going to continue as a citizen committee which I think is great And they're gonna be more inclusive by bringing more people in from the community with more expertise. I think that's great, so I see this as a win-win. So I don't know if there's anything else to address here. They've pretty much resigned. I think as a council we need to bring it back and ask ourselves if we do want to continue this what are we looking for in the next committee?

And I would offer that we bring that back probably in the first meeting in September.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:29:47

Thank you. I just really want to thank Michelle, Steve, Brian, Phil and Jim for all the hard work it Phil and Steve specifically, before I even the ink settled on becoming a member of the Air Pollution Control District reached out to me and really helped supplement my knowledge and understanding. And I just want to commend their expertise. I've known Brian a long time. I appointed him to the committee. I think he's been a wonderful asset.

I had a conversation with him this morning That was really positive. And I think that this could be a move that, well it feels like there's some friction involved between the committee and everything else. I think the Brown Act requirement of six months was gonna make it difficult for them to do their job frankly because of the way they have to do it and the way they have to kind of work together in a different fashion than we do on the council. With that being said, I don't anticipate not working with these people. Steve is still the Ojai liaison to the public input aspect of the Air Pollution Control District.

I'll never stop being friends with Brian as long as I'm alive he's a great human being. I've really liked Phil, I got to know Jim a little bit better and I think Michelle's stance on a lot of this stuff is one of the best experts we have in town So I'm with you, Randy. Call it a win-win. I think there's some clear friction but I don't see this as a lose-lose for sure. I think we can reformat, recapitulate and figure out a way to make this even better. I don't anticipate not working with any of these people and one thing i found out today that was really interesting in a An amazing point of all this that shouldn't be lost is that all five members, although I would have thought they were all working together and knew each other and sat in some climate coffee shop together all the time.

None of them knew each other when we all picked them. None of them had a relationship with each other. One of the really glowing aspects of this is the five people we picked are now A unit together and can work together to accomplish a lot more than they could separately before. And I had no idea that that was the situation before, they may have loosely known each other but I know Steve had mentioned to me that they really didn't know each other before they ended up on the climate committee together. So, you know, Ojai is not going to change its values or the fabric of being a progressive environmental city. We're not going to not need help and expertise, we just may not have it exactly the same way or formatted the same way, but I highly highly doubt and I wouldn't want it These five really smart, really passionate people about an issue that's important to Ojai go too far away or stopping important part of I know the filling in the gap of the expertise I don't have.

And I think for all of us they're just really fantastic resources and I say all the time you know the fourth leg of the chair that holds Ojai up are really fantastic volunteers and experts in the community and volunteers And this is that group. So I just want to say thank you, I hope it's not coming to an end with a bad taste in their mouth. I hope we can continue to work together just in a different fashion and I really support what Randy said about it being a win-win. And let's see if we can't make this thing morph into something else that maybe still has a really great impact.

2:33 – 2:428 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:26

Consider making another kind of committee that the city does everything possible to support what we've helped to create. And I think they've made the right decision to become a citizen action group, that they're not going to be constrained by the Brown Act. Perhaps we can help them You know, I think we should have a statement on the city website underneath the Climate Emergency Mobilization Committee page that gives the public information that this committee is now a citizen action committee and provide contact information And perhaps they'll give us some instruction on how they would like that word. That's what I would like to see happen, that we support them in any way that we can.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:34:34

And I would just like to echo Ryan's comments. Thank you. Thank you, thank you to the committee what great resources and experts and we're so grateful for these people giving so many of their hours of time to us. I think it's unfortunate that we all can't get along and work together sometimes so that's Not a win-win, although moving forward I agree with you Susa that they can do their beautiful work and not be hindered.

So yeah. Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:35:15

Yeah, well I think Susan's ideas is commendable. I don't think we need to create conflict on our own website as to what our future committee is going to look like. Kudos to this group. Again, I'm the one who recommended Jim And I recommended Jim because he's a progressive, he's a deep thinker. He's obviously a very intelligent man but I didn't have really any clear understanding that he had anything over anyone else when it came to climate. But what he is is he's great organizer and a thoughtful individual and a deep thinker So every one of these gentlemen and Michelle brought something unique and special to the group.

And moving forward, I think we would be looking for the same thing. I think one of the bigger issues here is staff time. And to me, one of the reasons in the development of this committee was because we didn't have staff time and we don't have staff time. And it's just that simple. So we relied on them to be the staff, we relied on them to bring back to us a tremendous amount of information and in these packets that we're gonna review you can see how much work they did so obviously very bright group of individuals they believe strongly in our community They believe strongly in what we're trying to achieve.

And I'm not losing a friend here, I'm not losing any friends here. If anything I see us gaining that we'll have more than one committee working on this so again I see it as a win-win moving forward.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:37:09

Anybody else? Okay so uh no motion here We'll just moving forward to number seven.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:24

I did hear them say that they're going to come back, they're going to continue to come back to the city council with policy recommendations and I would say that if necessary we give them a platform to express that. Perhaps they can do a presentation down the road and that sort of thing, and of course they're going to participate in the general plan. I think that's all I want to say.

Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:38:00

you. Okay. All right moving on to number seven please. Reach codes

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:38:08

It's similar to the last item. With both of these, we had scheduled six-month reviews. I think this one is actually it is on six months. I think it was the last one I noted but because we don't have the July meetings were doing all of these reviews at either tonight's meeting or any other time sensitive item for July will be at the next meeting so We're trying to make sure we get all of these handled. So this was the six month review of the reach codes back in January, the city adopted a reach code ordinance that require and a reach code is a code that reaches beyond the state minimum and requires has higher requirements than the basic reach or basic code would have. We adopted a reach code that required certain electric components in new construction, residential and non-residential buildings.

The big one a lot of people talked about and a lot of people may know this no reach codes by this is our code requires electric stoves for example if you're in a building that is not exempt from the ordinance instead of gas so it requires things like All electric appliances. So the city adopted the REACH code six months ago, and the City Council at that time asked us to provide a six-month status report there because we don't have a lot of development in Ojai. The status report is pretty simple. In the six months since adoption of the REACH codes, the city's approved One single-family residence, no new commercial buildings and 5 ADUs. None of those approved permits have been required to install all electric appliances.

The single family residence likely would have but it had been applied for prior to adoption of the REACH codes The ADU is all qualified for the ADU exemption to our reach codes. So, the simple report back is that six months in we haven't had one subject to this... Subject to the Reach Codes at this time. Further just we have noted that the ordinance we adopted needs to have a couple of items clarified and corrected namely the effective date needs to be clarified We explained that, but in the packet we included what we're calling a fix-it ordinance as attachment B which doesn't change anything other than the effective date and corrects that issue.

So with that, the staff recommendation is to receive the report and adopt the attachment B ordinance to correct that issue.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:41:21

And if I could add two more words on that ordinance, it would be a introduction tonight adoption next time. And the intention is to reflecting the final reach codes ordinance as adopted which in its primary operative provisions only amended the California building code and the California residential code not amending of the energy code and thereby not requiring approval by the California Energy Commission staff took it to the energy commission in conversation with the energy commissions staff and their attorneys The word was that they would have no jurisdiction over it and will not be providing any kind of a thumbs up because it's not within their power.

To clarify that point and to eliminate any confusion as to the effectiveness of the city's reach codes, we recommend adoption of the quote fix-it ordinance to amend section 7 of the original ordinance to drop out reference to approval by the Energy Commission given the structure of the reach code ordinance as adopted. And I'm available for any questions, thank you.

2:42 – 2:564 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:42:29

Okay, questions for staff? Questions for the mayor. Are we planning to hear from the public and then go... I would like to go through the exceptions. Yes. As I did not vote For all these, the last time this was before the council I did not vote for these exceptions.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:42:59

Are we ready for public comment? And Gail could we please have Phil White first who has a very brief presentation maybe five minutes on the nine exceptions thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:43:14

OK so Phil you should be able to speak if you're muted please go ahead and unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:43:23

Okay, thank you Gail and thank you council. I'm appreciative of the kind comments you made in the previous item this has been one of the most interesting things i've ever done in my life and i'm really proud of the city of Ojai and the City Council in Ojai for everything they've done to address climate change The Reach Code being a big part of that. We're going to continue to make recommendations, but tonight let's talk Reach Code.

We are in support of the staff recommendation to approve the package that has been presented to you. There we see no reason why that can't go forward. We do have some comments which I'm sure you've seen in the packet came in Friday night, I guess included some 300 pages of documents. Mainly cost-effectiveness studies for electrification of buildings in California, including Ojai.

If I could, I would like to show a very quick PowerPoint to demonstrate what our recommendations are. I don't think you're prepared to act on them tonight, to adopt them tonight but I would like to introduce them and I think we want to recommend that our recommendations be referred to staff for vetting and coming back to your council with with the proposed amendments to the Reach Code if you're agreeable to do so.

In general, we are happy with the Reach Code, the way it's written, the appeal process is great that comes back to the council ultimately. That's the way it should be. We do have some issues with the exemptions that were adopted in November Which I would like to address briefly. Again, our recommendation is to approve what James brought take our recommended amendments on exceptions to the Reach Code, refer that to staff with our assistance.

To come back to you at a future meeting with a recommendation. So if I could get the PowerPoint, I'll run through real quickly the exceptions and what our positions are. Okay, if we could take the first one. These are in order of the exceptions that are in the... I don't have control over this, I don't think, do I? Yeah, if we could see the next screen please.

These are the exemptions that are in the initial Reach Code and in the Reach Code document that you're going to be voting on tonight And we don't disagree with some of them. We do have issues with some of them and I can explain quickly. If we go to the next one, temporary buildings are accepted. We have no problem with that exception. Next one please. Attached accessory dwelling units We have found by going through the cost-effectiveness energy studies, these are in your packet and that's the 300 pages of very technical stuff.

This is prepared by the California Energy Codes and Standards Program using procedures that the state of California uses in adopting new building codes In the case of attached accessory dwelling units, we have no problem where a new accessory dwelling unit falls within the footprint of an existing building. For example, a garage conversion maybe would want to... The owner would want to extend natural gas into that ADU. We don't see a problem with it However, if there is new construction outside the footprint this is a new building and we believe that attached accessory dwelling units should not be exempted.

The next slide please. Freestanding accessory dwelling units that require electrical panel upgrade. This is probably our biggest concern, the biggest loophole in REACH code as adopted in November. We are persuaded by the cost effectiveness studies done by the state codes and standards program that are in your packet That it is cost effective to make these new buildings all electric.

And in fact, to put it another way, it's the lowest cost way for energy to build ADUs is with electricity. Use of gas increases the cost. We're a climate committee, but we're also concerned about the cost of buildings and housing. And the lowest cost housing will be all electric. The studies show that quite clearly, so we think this exemption should be done away with. The language of the exemption talks about if an electrical panel would be required The study done by the state says as follows, the REACH code team found that a new detached ADU would require that the building owner upgrade the service connection. This is the electrical service connection to the lot in both the mixed fuel ADU design and the all electric design.

There's no, there's really no reason to exempt them and because most of the housing in Ojai will be ADUs we think this exemption should go away. Next slide please. Stationary natural gas backup generators While we're not as concerned about this as we are on residential exemptions that are in the Reach Code now, we recommend that this exemption be deleted. We do need resiliency in Ojai. You were talking earlier about electrical power shutoffs A better solution is a battery backup like why Rick has in his house. Next slide, please. Deed restricted affordable housing units we don't believe should be Accepted, exempted.

We recommend this deletion be deleted. Again all electric construction has been calculated in these state studies to be the lowest cost way to construct the energy systems and buildings. Next slide please. Remodels, there is kind of to me kind of confusing language regarding remodels. We think that this exception exemption should be deleted. It's confusing and actually implies that remodels will need conversion, and we've made it clear from the beginning that the reach code only applies to new buildings.

Next slide please. Restaurants, this is a different one. We're kind of in the middle ground. We understand that when it comes to restaurants that some of the chefs and cooks prefer gas cooking. We don't think that the city should be in the way of cooks and chefs cooking the way they want to However, the other energy uses in the building ought to be electric in the code as they are for residential buildings and other non-residential buildings. So if there is an exception made it would be for cooking only.

Next slide please. The swimming pools is an exception in the November code. We recommend that this exemption be deleted. It's been shown that solar and heat pump heating systems have shown that natural gas is not needed for pool heating, that solar and heat pump systems are cost effective. So we think this should be eliminated. Again, if we go to the next slide please.

The last thing in our letter, and I encourage you to look at our letter of May 28th where we talk about the reasons for our recommendations. We talk about the appeals process. A Reach Code needs a good appeals process to be effective because there always will be strange cases that come up And the way that the appeals process is written in the Reach Code now, is fine. The Community Development Director with an appeal to the Planning Commission with a further appeal to the City Council Would take care of the special cases that are bound to come forward.

So again, our recommendation would be to approve what James has brought to you on this item. James and the city attorney have brought to you for this item. And further we recommend Our recommendations for amendments on these exceptions, these exemptions be submitted to staff for vetting with our participation. We've spent a lot of time on this already and in short order we can help James come to a logical conclusion and bring back any specific amendments to the Reach Code at a future meeting.

I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.

2:56 – 3:0313 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:56:20

Thank you so much, Bill. Any questions for Bill? Susan and then Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:56:27

You know, I live in an old house built in 1949 And I did ask Steve, why is my electric bill so high? Because the case and I'm convinced that with new construction, new technology, the electric bill will be more equivalent to what we now consider a reasonable gas bill. That's my understanding. And I didn't really understand and maybe you could explain I was told that my high electric cost is due to resistance heating, very inefficient and expensive.

The heat pump systems being installed in new construction is incredibly efficient and lowest costs even in the short term. Immediate capital cost of building all are lower Then building with both gas and electric, and the long term cost effectiveness is clear cut. So I think I'm not the only member of the public that doesn't quite grasp that this reach code applies to new construction, new technology. It's not asking someone that's living in an old house to convert to all electric.

And maybe you could explain a little bit about the heat pump systems technology, the difference between that and me trying to heat my old house which doesn't have the gas heaters broken. So if I try to heat it with electricity, it's very... The bill is very high. The difference between that and new construction with new technology

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:58:28

Okay, are we still in the meeting?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:58:33

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:58:34

you are Phil. We

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:58:34

can hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:58:35

Okay well Susa I don't know the situation in your house we live in a house just outside the city limits built in the 60s and my wife and I are in the process of converting it voluntarily to all electric induction cooktop and heat pump for heating and air conditioning We have an electric oven. We're doing this on our own, the reach code does not affect existing buildings like mine or yours Sousa.

It costs a lot more money to retrofit existing buildings maybe that will happen in the future but at this point we're not there and we're not recommending that to the council to do that. I would be happy to come by your house and give you some advice and look at what you got.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:37

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:59:38

Andy, I think you had a question of me too? Phil why don't you explain to people how heat pumps work? Oh gosh! You all live in Ojai and if you have air conditioning does anybody not have air conditioning? Well, how does it actually extract?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:59

I don't have air conditioning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:00:03

Most people do and an air conditioning system works by using refrigerants to transfer heat from the indoors in the case of air conditioning to the outdoors and a heat pump reverses that and transfers heat from the outdoors into the indoors using refrigerants and compressors. If you have existing air conditioning, your electrical bill will not go up for air conditioning. You don't have to adjust the service They work just great. And most people that have air conditioning have half of the heat pump.

Did I answer your question?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:01:00

Not really, but maybe I need to ask it differently. So Phil, I was doing a little investigating on heat pumps and it seemed to be at a temperature of 47 degrees There's not enough heat in the air for these pumps to be functioning at a high level or at a high capacity. So is there a breaking point at a certain temperature that you would have to run your heat pump longer to create more heat for your home?

Which in turn I would transfer to the swimming pool technology and things of that nature. But instead of doing that, let's just stay with the house. So at what temperature do you have to run your heat pump longer to heat your house?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:01:58

Well, you're absolutely right that heat pumps because they are bringing in energy from outdoors and bringing it indoors through the refrigerant compressor process. As it gets colder and colder outside they put out less heat inside That's a known factor. The systems need to be properly sized so that on a design winter day, Pick your temperature you want to offset in the outdoor temperature, but you size the equipment appropriately just as you do a heating system fired by natural gas has to be properly sized to meet the heat load of your building. So it's a calc that needs to happen.

Yes, it can take longer to heat a house or a pool with heat pumps or hot water, yes.

3:03 – 3:1325 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:03:06

Yeah, I contacted Raypak and they were one of the biggest gas heaters manufacturers here for swimming pools in Ventura County. Probably in Southern California at one time. And they make both, they make heat pumps and they make conventional gas appliances for for pools and spas, and for home heating. And that's where I got this information so i was just wondering if you guys had factored that into any of your equivalents when you were talking about the benefits cost effectiveness?

If I have to run my heat pump longer in winter because the temperatures are lower Did you guys do a cost analysis of that and is there a win? Or if you're saying I need to buy a bigger unit, did you factor in what size units are available and what those units might cost or did we just use an average?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:04:05

Okay. Now I understand your question. We didn't do these economic studies. These were done by the state done by the California Energy Codes and Standards Program. And yes, they do take into account everything. They take into account for every climate, there's 16 climate zones in California. Ojai is number nine and has its own unique characteristics, high temperature, low temperature.

And yes they did in their modeling take that into account. And still have they came to the conclusion that all electric construction is the most cost effective way to put energy into buildings?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:05:01

Okay thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:05:03

You're welcome

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:05:04

Wow, that's so cool. Bill, your hand up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:05:08

I'd like to point out, I think we're kind of going off the rails here. We're actually in public comment and we should give everyone that wants to speak an equal opportunity. These are great questions for Phillip. I'm not finished Mayor. And then I think that rather than getting into deliberation since we're actually engaging in a vetting process, we should be talking about how we want to vet these proposals rather than vetting them tonight

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:05:34

I'm ready to make a motion after the public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:05:36

comment.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:05:38

We're finished with questions for Phil, can we

move on to the next person Gail please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:05:45

Thank you very much for your attention and your interest in climate change appreciate it

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:05:51

thank you so much Phil

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:05:54

Next we have Anita Hendricks. Anita I'm going to you should be able to speak. Oh Anita is the one I need to promote her to a panelist in order for her to speak in the meeting so Anita you should be able to talk now if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead. Anita are you there? Yes we can,

CommentAnita HendricksProposed3:06:26

yes. Okay well I would like, I think it's great that you're doing this reach I have to endorse most of what Phil said. I do have some questions. Why would a restaurant be exempt when they have such a huge volume of gas? I kind of understand it because most people like the variability of gas and I used to be a professional cook myself, but that's a huge volume of gas.

That's one question for Phil and the other is, let's see if I can find it here. With the footprint, why do you give an, don't recommend, why would a house that is having a remodel within its footprint not have to comply? I don't see how it would make a difference if it's cost effective. Why they would get and exemption. So I'm totally back Phil on his recommendations that he just presented, but those are two questions and concerns I have.

So Phil can you answer that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:07:48

Phil's no longer a part of the conversation.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:07:50

Sorry Anita thank you for your comment and great questions and um I'll ask Phil to get back to you thank you very much. Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:08:00

okay let me just one moment. Okay there we go so the next person we have will be Jay Simmons, Jay if you're there you can go ahead and speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and talk Jay, are you there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:08:32

Yes. I'm here. Can you hear me? Okay. You can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:08:33

go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:08:36

Yes. Um, I had the opportunity to witness or view the climate discussion meeting a couple days ago and it's extremely impressive what this group has done and I would like to commend And I think the committee has come up with some really good suggestions. I would hope that the council will go ahead and pursue the investigation of those recommendations, and if the evidence shows that they are accurate That we should implement and include those in a revised reach code.

Again, I would highly commend the committee for their work and the council for their foresight and their energy in pursuing this. I think we all have a huge investment in making this stuff right And going out it as best we can, because we know that the costs are only going to increase as our climate. It forces us to do certain things and better now with some insight than later when we don't have much choice. Thank you very much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:10:09

Thank you Jay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:10:11

Next Gail please. Next we have, let me see Jan Dietrich if I'm mispronouncing your name I apologize you should be able to speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:10:26

Thank you Gail yeah that's my name and I'm speaking on behalf of the 350 Ventura County Climate Hub My notes are missing here. There we go. We applaud your council's November adoption of the reach code, I want to mention that the number 350 in the name of our global network of chapters. That calls for urgent climate action represents the 350 parts per million of carbon dioxide that is associated with a stable climate. A benchmark atmospheric CO2 level of 419 parts per million was just reached this last few days that has not been seen in the past 800,000 years.

So we're refreshing our call for more ambitious local climate action and our next step will be a survey to all government entities in the county about climate action. Ojai is going to score well because you declared a climate emergency, and I'm happy to hear Councilwoman Francine's suggestion about a very interactive substantive Climate page on your website so this can go into our survey as well.

The climate emergency mobilization members have been excellent, and they did deserve staff support. Perhaps the city can provide us through a grant. The members clearly strive to base their recommendations in alignment with data. And by the way, doubters about climate change would not be qualified for such a committee where they would be contradicting the findings of 98% of scientists.

So we encourage you to follow their new recommendations. The exemptions don't make sense especially the detached ADUs and low income new construction. A few of these exemptions, just from the get go took you in the wrong direction for environmental justice and climate goals. We need faster decarbonizing of buildings. Allowing any buildings to be built with gas infrastructure is folly when Congress is planning to put a rising tax on carbon, which is a part of President Biden's climate legislative package.

It is widely agreed that President Biden cannot reach the goal of cutting in half greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 without decarbonizing buildings. So we appreciate your leadership And we are helping inform your community why this reach code is going in the right direction and would be improved by removing the exemptions as recommended by your climate committee. Thank you for the time to express this, appreciate everything you're doing.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:13:40

Wow, thank you Jan. Much appreciated. Next, Gail?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:13:44

Next we have Wendy Larner. Wendy if you're there you can go ahead and speak if you're muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead.

3:13 – 3:194 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:13:55

The recommended deletions in ordinance 911 may be overreach and unnecessarily costly and restricted to the people of Ojai. It opens the door for future even more Burdensome regulations under the label emergency. It is indeed about power, government power perhaps just the beginning of a power grab by the few over the many using scare tactics. Certainly resolution number 1930 declaring a climate emergency seems so and I'll just quote from that This emergency threatens to destroy civilization and kill billions of people. This climate change will wreak havoc across the United States. Human activities have warmed the earth to a point that threatened climate stability and human existence.

Please reject this ordinance, or at least table it until more comprehensive information is considered. I have lived long enough and read enough history to recognize dangerous hyperbole. I also want to address the California Energy Code plan that was referenced earlier. Notice the caveats It was prepared by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and funded by the utility customers. Neither PG&E nor any of its employees makes any warranty express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any data information method product et cetera. Both methodologies used required estimating and quantifying from three prototypes. That was all, three prototypes. It just seems there are a myriad of other factors to be considered than were considered here.

And I just don't think this tool that was added to their proposal has value for our purposes. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:16:18

Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:16:18

Andy. Next, Gail, please? Next we have Steve Colamez. Steve if you're there, you can go ahead and speak if you're muted. Go ahead and unmute yourself and you can go ahead and talk.

CommentSteve ColamezProposed3:16:30

Sure, just done. I'm speaking now as a member of the committee but not representing the committee and I just want to address climate denial. It's often said that 97-99% of scientists acknowledge the reality of climate change and global warming Well actually it's more accurate to say that 100% of educated scientists would concur with two observations. Number one, the climate is warming. That observation is supported by copious amounts of empirical measurements of temperature increases in oceans, the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. Temperatures are increasing at a rate that's unprecedented in human history.

That's simply a fact. Secondly, that human activity is primarily responsible for the observed temperature increases caused primarily by release of carbon dioxide through the burning of fossil fuels and methane emissions. And as a scientist which is what I am we are trained to approach questions with open minds and our understanding can always be adjusted by new data.

So for example there were still significant questions regarding the physics in the physics community regarding gravitational attraction. Yet, I seriously doubt that anyone would take advantage of that uncertainty to leap off a 20-story building in the belief somehow that they would not meet their fate on the ground. Unfortunately there are a few scientists willing to violate their training in the service of private masters To everyone here, I recommend the following book.

The Merchants of Doubt How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming written by Harvard University historian of science Naomi Oreskes and Eric Conway. And I strongly suspect that the vast majority of Ojai residents prefer fact over fiction And truth over lies, and I'll take my remaining time to respond to Mr wire Rick who accused me of misrepresentation.

I proudly have never represented either my knowledge or understanding. And in all of the work that I've done advising federal and state agencies, foreign governments and Congress, I have been asked and expected to be brutally honest. The only person caught publicly in misrepresentation has been Mr. Wyrick. Thank you.

3:19 – 3:2424 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:19:08

Thank you, Dr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:19:09

Steve. Next Gail please? Next we have Rudy Gonzales. Rudy if you're there you can go ahead and speak if you're muted please go ahead and unmute yourself and you can you can go ahead now.

CommentRudy GonzalesProposed3:19:21

Thank you so much I appreciate the opportunity to take just a couple of moments and speak a little bit about a concern that has been raised previously and was actually raised earlier this evening and that is around electric reliability In our pathway 2045 paper, we've outlined a vision for how California can achieve deep decarbonization in a way that's affordable and practical.

Most importantly, we've identified what steps are necessary to expedite the clean energy transition. And one component of that is through building electrification. So it's logical Folks might question the reliability of the grid if we move to a greater dependence on electricity. And I can tell you that the state, investor-owned utilities and state regulators and the Energy Commission are all taking the steps necessary to ensure that we have adequate resources available to meet the growing demand of electricity both from Building electrifications, as well as the electrification of the transportation industry.

Last year we had a hiccup in August of last year. We experienced rotating outages for the first time I think in about 17 years. And as a result of that, the state along with the investor owned utilities are taking steps necessary to increase capacity ensure that we have adequate resources available to meet the increasing heat storm activity that we're experiencing.

The last part that I'll mention is around public safety power shutoffs Those were unfortunately a regular occurrence over the past couple of years. We're in the process now of winding down a couple of major projects in this city of Ojai, the two circuits that are the primary sources of electricity in the community, the Patricia and the Thatcher circuit are being completed with insulated wire.

Therefore we'll be able to increase before we implement PSPS activation. So, we're doing everything that we can to harden our grid and make it more resilient to fire threat and we believe that all that work will result in greater reliability. Thank you so much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:21:55

Thank you Rudy for the clarification. Next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21:58

Gail? And that is it.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:22:02

Great! Thank you so much. discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:22:10

Randy just real quickly the only thing I didn't hear from Rudy were rate increases what are they projecting down the road? I mean as we all go electric, it's just a question that's always in the back of The head is, as you move forward and you consolidate and someone monopolizes, you have a tendency to lose control. So I think everything that Rudy said was great but again, I don't think they addressed the bottom line is what will we look like? And what will it cost in our future? And I know that's a big question that'd be very difficult to project but it's still there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:22:54

Can I raise a point of order? If we want to take up the last item, we're going to have to continue and take up the last item because our 1030 is shut off. But if we don't want to take it up then that's okay. I just want to point out the time.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:23:07

Yeah um yeah we got three minutes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:12

Is it time sensitive James?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:23:14

Well, it's up to us. It's up to us whether we want to continue this item and take up the last item and then come back to this item tonight or not. It is up to use.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:25

And I'm asking if the last item is time sensitive?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:23:29

You know, at the next meeting we're bringing back the ADU update which will include the standardized plan which was also assigned to the BAB.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:23:41

So

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:23:42

there may be logic though to bringing both of the BAP related items together.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:23:50

Guys please one at a time so Bill then Ryan. Hang

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:23:54

on a minute I was just going to say if we need somebody to move that we take item eight next time i'll move for that. I'll second

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:02

okay vote on that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:24:06

I don't think we need a vote. Consensus is fine, I think I've heard consensus to that effect. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:13

and there are no public speakers on item 8.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:15

Okay thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:24:17

We're moving to eight right now? No

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:24:18

no

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:19

we're not, it's on the 22nd next meeting.

3:24 – 3:3033 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:24:25

Is that what we voted on? I thought we voted to continue the existing item. Was that your motion, Ryan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:24:31

No, I'm sorry. I was saying let's just push eight off to the next meeting. Okay. I'm sorry. That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:24:35

fine

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:37

then. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:24:39

Yeah.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:40

Thank you, Ryan. We're discussing seven right now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:24:43

Yeah, thank you. I just wanted to make sure we made a choice.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:50

Can I make a motion and then we can discuss Sure. Okay, my motion is to direct staff to vet the exemptions that the Climate Emergency Committee recommends and that we remove the exemptions... Let me start over. Direct staff to vet the exemptions that the Climate Emergency Committee recommend that we remove in their letter of May 28th 2021 And I can read out the numbers if necessary, but that's my motion.

It's in the letter. Is that an adequate motion or do you need to clarify anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:25:40

The only question will be whether you also wish to introduce the ordinance as proposed that clarifies the effective date, or if you wanted to take that separately

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:25:50

No, I think it can be done together. What you said?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:25:55

Yes that could be done together. That would be to introduce an ordinance of the City Council city of Ojai amending section 7 of ordinance number 911 clarifying its effective date.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:07

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:10

Well, can we amend that Sousa? Would you be open to amendment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:14

Yes. I'd like to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:15

hear it. That we recognize who staff is and this is all title nine jurisdiction that I would recommend that we send it to BAB for clearing versus staff out. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:28

I'm sorry. I don't accept that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:30

Well fine let me finish before you don't accept.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:33

Okay go ahead sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:37

Mayor am I recognized?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:26:38

Yes thank you but we don't have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:26:40

a second yet.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:26:42

Yeah I'll second Sousa's if not Randy's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:26:45

okay all right then we're at discussion yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:26:47

okay so that would be my amendment and if that's not an acceptable amendment then I would make it as a second motion. I would like to make an alternative motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:27:00

That would be in order as either a substitute motion or as an amendment to the prior motion perhaps as an amendment given it's a modification not so much of a full-scale remove and replace.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:27:15

So we would vote on that amendment that it goes to BAB for review versus staff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:27:21

Correct, although that amendment would require a second which I don't think I've yet heard I'll second it. Well, can I ask a question

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:27:28

about that though? Can I ask you a question Randy about your amendment why because I looked into the history a little bit and it went to BAB in February 2022 and it was delayed delayed delayed finally in October BAB dealt with it and from what I heard it didn't go well at all And finally it went to council. So, and I mean Bill did you think it didn't go well so why would you send it back there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:28:04

So there are protocols.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:28:06

No, I understand that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:28:08

Well, let me answer I'd like to get back to what we do. And under your leadership, maybe you can make the BAB and make this group play together in the sandbox That's one of the leadership skills that you bring to the club now. So I'm just saying, that's the logical place to take it and it will then come back to council and probably the most important thing that we do As a council and as, and as saying that to our deliberative bodies whether it's planning arts commission or rec and parks or any of these is the fact that it gives the community an opportunity to weigh in. It provides for more transparency.

So if we don't want to do that Then we're not giving the community the opportunity to participate in this, like we all agree that they need to and that they should. Now if they don't, that's on them and BAB can deliberate and BAB can get it back to us. So that to me I think is the logical choice here so that's why I motioned the way I did. Well then Susan?

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:29:39

Yeah, I just want to amplify that. It's about transparency and public engagement And that means you go through the process. If we're not happy with BAB in the past, then I think the answer is to put a time certain for them to come back and take this up, offer public engagement and come back to us. But to circumvent public engagement and transparency, I think it's a mistake.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:08

There's a question from Matt. Are we legally required to send this to the BAB?

3:30 – 3:3612 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:30:18

No, it is not legally required by state law that the proposal to further narrow the reach codes exemptions go to the Building Appeals Board. It is a choice of the City Council majority.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:30:33

Okay thank you. You know we as a council selected five experts and this Over a year, two years actually. They have provided hundreds and hundreds of documents. I don't know what and now where I'm asking staff to vet those documents to make sure that they're not prejudiced, that they're credible. That's all I'm asking staff to read all of this and then come back and tell us, give us their educated assessment.

I do not see any reason to send this to a committee that we already know is opposed to reach codes are not in a committee that is looking at this with an open mind. All you have to do is watch the last time The last meeting on the beach coach, you'll see how rude they were to the expert that was presenting. If I felt that the BAB consisted of people that had an open mind, I might feel more comfortable but I am not in any way comfortable to send this back to the BAB. I feel like it's just a delayed tactic And that you are not honoring the work of the people that you selected.

I feel like there's a level of arrogance here, that you know more than the experts that we selected. So no, I don't accept that amendment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:32:26

I think, well it's a substitute. Hey

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:32:29

guys, I got it! Randy!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:32:32

No, Ryan was next.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:32:33

No, Randy was next.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:32:34

Ryan was next Mayor.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:32:36

Sorry. Okay go ahead Ryan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:32:40

There's no official order.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:32:44

Let's just you guys if you could bring it back to the chair and not call on other people because I'm the chair thank you okay go ahead Ryan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:32:52

Thank you. We, you know I when we when we, I was the one who moved to put this out six months and review it. And I was hoping we get some new data over the last six months we've had one of the biggest explosions of real estate You know, movement in the city of Ojai in a long time. During that time we had exactly zero new single family residents that were built that would be subject to this code. We had a couple of ADUs I just don't think we've learned any new information there's really not a change in circumstances or an additional amount of data that we've been provided To be able to work with from our city, not from the outside sources. That when I read on these documents who some of the creators of these sources are and that it's Edison and other utility companies, I do worry about it.

And it's through the Public Utility Commission which as somebody who spent a lot of time on behalf of the city dealing with, I have very little respect for their ability to get it right. And very little respect for their ability to vet. the data correctly. I don't disagree with this committee saying, hey, this is something that's gonna come up in the future and this may be the way we need to go. But we don't have the luxury in Ojai being so lucrative, so rich that we can do something that might increase the cost of living or the ability to build a new home especially on these ADUs. Our policy has been steadfast on ADUs including fighting with the sanitation district Creating preset plans at our own cost, so people can make it cheaper.

I'm not compelled yet that it is actually less expensive to go all electric. And the reason for that is outside of all the information we're being provided and we know there's competing scientific ideas on this. It's not settled 100%, I don't think so. But we don't see contractors and builders telling people this is the way you should go to save money. And that's concerning to me. And I do agree with the environmental portion of it, but I don't necessarily believe that we should be increasing the cost of housing in Ojai especially ADUs which we have a set best policy of trying to reduce every cost available to put in an ADU.

So I just don't see a lot of data here that tells us that our current reach code Or an amendment to the reach code is going to make any difference. In fact, over the last six months it would make absolutely no difference whatsoever and I don't want it to be a problem or to be something that we go to be on the leading edge of an environmental issue on but end up hurting ourselves because we're actually increasing the cost of housing and increasing the cost of living and increasing these other costs Almost all agree is one of the biggest problems in Ojai.

And I don't think the biggest problem in Ojai is our environmental impact on the world, I think we're very good about that. I'm very concerned about how this affects the increased cost of trying to put in additional housing.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:36:08

Okay, Randy then Susan?

3:36 – 3:4128 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:36:13

One, I'd like to proceed with a vote. But before that, I just want to acknowledge for everyone's benefit there are things that I have seen that the committee has recommended that I would be for what I need is more time to study And to actually interact with the BAB when they do present this. You saw the questions I asked tonight about... Come on, help me with...

Oh come on you guys. What's the... With the heat pump? I need more time. Someone gives me 300 pages of information on a Friday night. I'm running a full-time business, there's only so much I can read. I need more time and I think again, there are things that I absolutely go along with. There are things that I would maybe even take further but I think the proper vetting mechanism for this is a title nine and that's through the BAP.

And I'm adamant about, that's where it should go at this point in time. Again we can set a date certain that it comes back and then we can deliberate again and we can move this one more time. So that's where I stand on it. And Mayor if I can to close the discussion and have a vote.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:37:44

Susan has a comment and then we can close it. Go ahead, Susan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:37:48

Reasons that Ryan gave regarding questioning the cost effectiveness, that's the very reason I made an emotion that staff should vet this. You know? I don't think you're ever going to have time to read all of the material. We've had two years to read all of the material and staff is paid to vet these kind of things. That's why we have staff. I doubt very much that the BAP committee is going to do any more reading than we have.

So, um, I'm not voting for your motion. Most unfortunate situation you're dragging your, you're obviously dragging your feet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:38:34

Directing something at me that mayor said we weren't gonna do tonight. Am I correct? Mayor?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:38:39

Correct, you have a motion and we have a second correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:44

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:38:44

Okay are we ready to vote

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:47

Gail? So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:38:50

the vote is first on the motion to amend which was made by Council Member Haney seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Weirich that would be to amend the main motion to direct the vetting of the Climate Emergency Committee's recommendations That motion is voted on first as an amendment. If it passes, then the main motion becomes to introduce the ordinance and have the Building Appeals Board vet the recommendations.

If that amendment fails, the main motion remains on the table and would be to introduce the ordinance and have the Climate Emergency Committee's recommendations vetted by staff. So it's a two-step process. The first vote would be on the amendment And it would be in order to call for the vote, unless of course other members of council had further comments.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:39:43

Okay. All right. Roll call please Gail? Mayor Sticks? Just to confirm this is we're voting to send it to BAB, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:39:53

Yes. This is a vote on the amendment to refer the matter to BAB.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:39:57

Okay. No.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:00

Mayor Pro Tem Weirich?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:40:01

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:03

Council Member Blatz? I'm sorry, was that no?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:40:07

No. I don't think it needs to go to that. My opinion is- I just couldn't hear

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:12

if you were

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:40:12

saying yes or no. I also don't think the staff should review either so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:15

Okay. Council Member Francina? No! Council Member Haney?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:40:21

Yes. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:24

Okay

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:40:25

and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:40:25

then- The vote then becomes a vote on the main motion which is to introduce the effective date fix-it ordinance And to direct the staff to vet the recommendations and return to the council at a later date.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:40:45

All right, may we have a

Roll-call vote 2–2 motion which is to introduce the effective date fix-it ordinance And to direct the staff to vet the recommendations and return to the counci · 1 under review
Show transcript
vote please Gail? Council Member Francina? Yes. Council Member Blatz? No. Mayor Pro Tem Weyrich? No Mayor Stixx? Yes Council Member Haney?
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:41:05

And I'd like to propose an alternative motion that we actually just change the effective date. As is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:41:15

listed in the staff report.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:41:18

Did you second it Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:41:20

Yes, I did.

3:41 – 3:5222 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:41:23

Okay vote on that please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:41:25

Gail. I don't understand. We're voting to do nothing except change the date

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:41:31

The motion on the table would be to simply introduce the ordinance fixing the effective date issue and to take no further action at this time on the recommendations from the Climate Committee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:41:42

You know what? I would like to say, I would amend one thing. I'm happy to bring this back in six months again and review it again hoping that we have more data about how it's affected our actual city if anyone is okay with that amendment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:41:59

What the hell?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:42:07

I believe I seconded it, Mayor. Is that part of the motion? It wasn't originally. I would like to do that though. I do think it's appropriate that we should bring it back. I'd be happy to concur with that amendment. If you continue this cycle until we get it right and we have enough data to see how it's impacting actual things in the city. Okay, I'm all right with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:42:32

I have a question, may I ask the question or before? How we no longer have a climate emergency committee. So are you saying that for the next six months, you're committed to doing your own independent research so that we're just not right back where we started six months from now? Who's going to further educate us?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:42:58

I think that the impact of the policy that we've passed has not been tested in our community yet. We don't have data about how this is affecting our community. I already did research and we went over in November, we've researched it again. I'm not compelled to change it, the council is not compelled to change it. I think we oughta continue in the path we're on and see how it affects whether we have any new construction or not. And the reality is that it's had no impact at all on anything so far.

And I think we gotta see how it works before we start increasing the potential impact of the policy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:43:36

But the truth is, there's no impact because of all these exemptions. There's never gonna be impact with all these exemptions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:43:46

I disagree with that we've had no new single family construction in Ojai and not all single family construction is exempt. So I don't agree with that, we haven't actually had an opportunity to see whether a new construction would have applied. The one that existed was permitted prior to this going into effect so it didn't impact it.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:44:07

Well all the new ADUs are gas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:44:12

Well, I've already expressed my opinion is that we shouldn't change the current policy for ADUs. So this would wait and see and we could see how additional ADUs are impacted or not. But I personally don't feel we should do anything to our policy like I said it's been steadfast of doing everything we can to make it as easy as possible to put in an ADU. And I don't believe requiring all electric on a new ADU even if it's separate from the home makes it easier to put in an ADU.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:44:39

Well, plus it's much safer because it's smaller and much less toxic than having a small place with gas. So that's my feeling here. Anyway, should we vote on this? Ready? Gail maybe the roll call please. Council Member Haney.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:44:58

So clarification, we're voting on tabling this for six months and coming back. And we are changing the date as recommended by staff. Betsy yes.

Roll-call vote 2–1 · 2 under review
Show transcript
Council Member Francina? No. Council Member Blatz? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Weyrich? Yes Mayor Stixx?
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:45:29

Okay, thank you. Yes, Susan? Before we go, before we end this discussion I would ask my colleagues on the council to look at the hidden cost. You know not just the financial cost but the hidden cost.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:45:48

Mayor, the discussion is over. Okay

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:45:51

moving on let's go to council member reports anybody have some reports

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:46:00

Mayor, really quick. Just remind everyone that we're awaiting county planning's response to the request of the Morse Quarry to be relieved of their current responsibility for 97,000 cubic yards in the reclaimed final surface plan that is currently on the book so that'll be an interesting An interesting, I think they have 40 days from the time they had the administrative hearing. And so we'll be watching that both force watch and Sierra club have weighed in terms of concern about that level or that magnitude of modification post closure plans for that situation up there at the quarry. And the second thing is that we continue to have city of Oxnard has gone ahead with Moving additional tons of solid waste, more miles, more wear and tear on the highway.

More pollution and more wait time to the waste management landfill from the publicly controlled Tolland Landfill. So that's an ongoing story. And we'll see how that plays out. And again they did that without a full environmental impact review. They did it through a dentum And unfortunately, what we see with public agencies is using addendums to old EIRs to get around the standards for EIRs that are generally imposed on the private sector. So it's an ongoing issue and concern I just want to report on.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:47:44

Thank you for taking care of that Bill. Anybody else? Well, I'd like to just give a huge shout out to staff for the Emergency Preparedness Day on May 27th. Thank you so much, James. Huge success! We had Matt Levere and Brian Brennan and police and fire and search and rescue and crew and the Humane Society. And it was just wonderful to see everybody there collaborating, helping out. So this is a really great event and you can watch it online.

That's exciting. And the next step will be Bob Ropers coming on August 10th to present a Phoenix plan fire preparation to present through council. Randy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:48:34

Just real quick, I attended the grand opening of the Thursday night farmers market and it was just incredibly well accepted in the community Um, I was blown away. It was, it was something I think everyone in this community has envisioned for years a town hall and a town center and some activities. And I'm sure there's some kinks that they'll work out. Um, I'm hoping that as they head into the summer, they change their hours instead of three to seven, maybe go four to eight or something where it's a little cooler versus midday three o'clock hundred degree weather in Ojai so But I thought it was phenomenal. And kudos to the school board, to Tiffany, all of her staff well run, well organized and I think the community loved it.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:49:30

Yeah, I agree. It was amazing. Thanks for bringing that up Randy and just a big shout out to their board Julie Gerard, Grace Malloy, Heath Perry, Michelle Lopez-Dorn and Steve Sprinkle and of course Tiffany who made it happen too so yes fabulous. Anything else from staff. Okay, moving on to city manager's report. James.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:49:57

Thank you just a couple things too. I wanted to mention these to keep an eye out for them next week and one of them I think people are excited about is the Libbey Park turf remodel the turf hill remodel is starting next week. And so we wanted to mention it anybody. That wants to go take a last slide down the old one and prepare for the new one to come in. Would you like get a shout out for that old one? Yeah, actually that's right yeah if you want to take the last ride on Council Member Haney's turf before it converts but so again is a project brought to us by Measure C so that's going to move forward next year or I'm sorry next week Which is amazing after the economic challenges we have this year.

Also that's around on that same date, June 15th, we're going to be doing the curb cut improvements on the corner of Ojai Avenue and Signal at the intersection there. So two I think long awaited improvements are gonna be moving forward at that time. And then just quickly although for Several items that are planned at this point. Two of them were public hearings, so we had to notice them in the newspaper. So those are somewhat firm. One is the final budget adoption. The other was as I mentioned earlier is the accessory dwelling unit ordinance recommendations and the standard plan report back. So those two will be public hearings and then On discussion, we just moved the BAB review of the fire hardening options to come back at that meeting as well.

And then we have the unveiling of our centennial logo and I think people have seen those 10 logos that were submitted as part of that contest and there's some pretty cool ones so we're looking forward to unveiling which will be selected to be on the posters and the commemorative coins and things like that for this year. And then the other one that's scheduled for that meeting is the cannabis tax review, we have the four months of data at this point so we'll bring that back and let the, the impacted businesses know that that will come back as well. So, so that's what's on the horizon on June 22.

That's all. Okay.

3:52 – 3:5825 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:52:40

All right, future agenda items. Anything else? Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:52:44

I have a couple. One, I was wondering if the council majority would entertain that we wrap into the discussion of the cannabis revenue report also have a discussion on some possible cannabis economic base expansion or diversification I'm thinking along the lines of, for example, it's come to my attention that we're kind of preventing now that we've allowed manufacturing. We prevented by the lack of distribution licenses, the ability for product being produced here to be directly marketed here.

At least that's a concern that I heard today. There's also the issue of whether or not we want to consider Um, allowing the dispensaries to help revitalize the East End commercial corridor or not. Or we want to keep them in the industrial area that with all the concerns that we've had about taking up industrial space? I don't want to...I'm just asking whether or not you uh, the rest of council feels that maybe we want to generalize that discussion or not and I am requesting that we consider that see if there's any support for that then I have a couple other things to ask

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:54:07

I support that discussion that you're suggesting.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:11

Okay, let's two council members

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:54:14

if the city manager feels and the city attorney feels that they can be tied together i don't know

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:54:23

The item could be structured to include a couple of those and with two that would be under the current protocols it'll be added to the agenda and we'll go from there

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:34

okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:54:36

Randy? As much as I'd like to have that conversation, I just think those two items are standalone Bill. I think what we're trying to get back from the from what's already agendized is really important. Those two issues are important. I just think that we're going to make something that we can accomplish and get done into something greater and larger that we may not get done I don't see any reason we can't bring those two back. Are we looking for a vote of the majority of council to bring those, put those on the agenda tonight or just to?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:55:08

Well, the protocol would be for, I guess, just to answer your, if I might Mayor, I'm

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:55:15

sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:55:15

Of course. I think Randy that their overlap in terms of tax revenue is based on tax base, you know it's and so I see the overlap there because we're talking about And so anyway, whenever our protocol is I see that Susan supports it. You know, I'd like to see them at least brought up for discussion and the majority can then decide they don't want to pursue it any further but I'd like to get it on the discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:55:45

Yeah if it turns out to be too much we can always continue in August.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:55:53

That's my first item request.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:55:56

to the current protocols would put that on the agenda so that my the floor is back to the council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:56:06

and i have two more really quick all right when mr roper makes his presentation will that also be a plan for us to begin deliberating on for adoption in terms of emergency plan yes an inquiry

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:56:18

yes yeah he's going to present it to counsel yep

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:56:21

okay and the third thing is i would like to uh request A 6 p.m closed session at the beginning of the next meeting to under the sort of safe harbor boilerplate of city manager performance evaluation where basically we have a discussion in light of a series of recent developments and events in terms of the right protocols to maintain maximum city manager productivity?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:56:53

I would second that.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:56:57

Okay. I was wondering, you know... Are you finished Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:57:05

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:57:06

Okay the chamber sent a letter to all of us and a citizen also sent a letter to us about a moratorium on the chain and so i was just wondering what you he made a request have any response to that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:57:24

What can we legally do Matt

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:57:27

So nothing is on tonight's agenda, so absolutely nothing tonight. No but I mean for next for the agenda time two members of council could put it on the agenda i don't know i haven't seen this letter so i have no idea what the chamber is asking for but i can guess um the item that they seem to have my expectation that is the item that they're seeking is the item that was on the agenda a couple meetings ago so we could bring that back if there was support from two The

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:57:55

emergency chain ordinance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:57:59

Which was the item that was on the prior agenda was a proposed urgency ordinance requiring a four-fifths vote to be adopted that would implement an immediate change to the definition of formula business under the zoning code and to lower the number of qualifying businesses from the current 11 to something lower, I think original proposal If there was support, but I would remind the council that any urgency ordinance requires a four-fifths vote.

Although only two can put it on the agenda, only it would take four to adopt it and that item is presently under consideration by the planning commission. They had a first discussion of it two meetings ago or at their last meeting and it's slated to return at an upcoming meeting for consideration of that item further. Thank you.

3:58 – 4:0333 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:58:55

I was just going to say, when we expect getting information back from planning? Because I know we said that if it wasn't an emergency motion and needed to go through planning.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:59:05

Yeah, they started the review. I think they're finishing the review on... I wrote that down. I want to say they're finishing their review at their first meeting in July. They're expecting to finish their review at the first meeting in July. So it would come back to us at our first meeting in August.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:59:22

Susan? We should consider bringing it back as an urgency requires forfeit just because we're not meeting in July. And a lot can happen in six weeks.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:59:39

I'd agree with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:59:40

Yeah,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:59:41

okay. So we'll put it back on for next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:59:45

time. Back as another emergency when it wasn't an emergency the first time, right? That's what I'm hearing and that it's already sent to planning and planning is deliberating and now we're going to assume we're gonna impose our will on it before planning stuff.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:00:00

Well I'd like to get the chamber to come and talk about it actually. Get

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:00:06

the chamber call each one of us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:00:08

and talk to us

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:00:08

about it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:00:08

They're still around by then apparently So this is where I'm going to jump in and note that the item is not on tonight's agenda, cannot be discussed further under the same protocols as before. We've heard two to seek an ask to come back next time so it will return as...I think what we'll do is we'll just bring the same item forward that was already drafted and prepared and thereby can be done quickly.

Come back next time for consideration by the council bearing in mind that it does require a four-fifths vote to adopt an urgency ordinance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:00:43

Trying to be fair here, Council Member Haney. I think if you were in Mr., Matthew stop me if I'm trying to talk the process here rather than deliberate okay? So you stopped me if I'm crossing the line here. I think the idea is to put a as I understand it basically to put a pause on any additional permitting Until the planning commission's had a chance to come back to council with their thoughts or recommendations.

That's my understanding of the procedural request, Randy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:01:23

Well that's not what was brought back it was again this item was an emergency so there are two different things you guys need to figure out what you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:01:30

want. I understand and that's why i just wanted to bring up that procedural point of what i understood from the chamber request

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:01:37

Thank you, Bill. That sounds great. So let's do that actually I have a clarification. That's not what was bought last time so the request is turned with a moratorium on any new form of business permit being issued. But again, would require... Is that the request from two members of council? I'm myself now confused.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:02:00

And the chamber requested it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:02:05

With respect what matters is what the council requests not what the chamber requests.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:02:08

So Susan and I would like to put it back on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:02:11

Well wait Betsy, the question is are we bringing it back as a pause until the planning commission comes back? Does that make sense to me right? Is that right Bill?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:02:24

I'm simply relating my understanding of what I read from the chamber communication.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:02:31

Yeah, I think Betsy, I would go with what Bill... My recommendation is to go with what Bill said rather than what was previous.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:02:40

Okay yes, I agree.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:02:42

That makes sense because now it's already been going through the planning commission we're just pausing until it gets back especially because in July We're on vacation, whereas if we weren't, we might have it back in July.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:02:59

And there's a lot of concern in the community,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:03:02

a

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:03:03

lot of concerns so... Okay anything else? I would like to at some point have a you know we adopted the Rosenberg rules and an opportunity to learn them actually as a group so no specific date but definitely get that in there at some point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:03:22

And edit our protocols to self-reflect.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed4:03:26

Yeah, because they're quite different. I thought we had edited the protocols to reflect Rosenberg's but if not that certainly can be done. I haven't seen the hard copy substitute yet. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed4:03:37

have it right here and it's added. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:03:40

sorry my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed4:03:41

mistake.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:03:41

To actually learn them and study them would be good. Anybody have anything else? Okay. All right, well I guess that's it thank you very much have a wonderful evening y'all thanks for all your hard work and this meeting is adjourned.