UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:278 turns
Okay, we have a
Roll call — called by City Clerk
Show transcript
she's-
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you Gail and welcome everyone to the January 18th 2022 joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission in the Ojai City Council. James will you do the pledge for us please?
Thank you James. And we are here tonight to meet with the Historic Preservation Commission to hear about Your priority topics, and we will in the city council be providing some feedback for that so I just want to thank you all for doing all this incredible work that you've done so far. And we're excited to hear about it and I'm going to turn it over to Chair Atkins.
Well welcome everybody. Thank you all for being here. Thank you, Mayor and City Council for accommodating us. We think This is important, and we're glad that you're here to work with us and support us as well as supporting yourselves. I find the eventual timing of this meeting as compared to last fall's plans intriguing. Think about what we would have missed had we met last fall. No Caltrans report to support our ad hoc committee findings, no uproar over the possible development of the Nordhoff Grammar School property. The timing for this meeting today is a pivotal moment in time. When the options, pivots are to move forward in protecting the community we love and cherish for so many reasons or the option to be overwhelmed by influences that would remove our heritage and change our city to being far from what has brought us to this day over 100 years.
James will remember this, I remember sitting with James at a community meeting last year in Libbey Park where we featured the first responders who give us so much protection. I sat by James off to the west side and in front of us was the bronze plaque celebrating the first 50 years of Ojai. I can see James smiling. In our discussion we asked ourselves what could we do now to properly celebrate our city's Ojai Centennial?
Today is that day when we decide to put forth something so few cities celebrate, our own centennial with our own downtown historic district. The HP Downtown Historic District Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Commissioner Gina McCattin, member Craig Walker, early member now Vice Chair Cindy Convery and me present to you a slideshow put together by Gina that will walk us through the centennial history that brings us to this very day.
We ask that you have your three items before you. The proposed downtown historic district map, the city qualifications might be upside down and the list of all the different landmarks. Now if you don't have them, don't worry we'll be walking through it. Let's see, so we also ask that you note the applicable slide number on your questions. That will make it easier for Gina to return to it. Following a few brief comments after the slideshow, the HPC commissioners are happy to answer questions.
And now I present to you the slideshow put together by Gina that's been previewed six times each time with changes. So Gina take it away please.
Hey, I'm going to share my screen. Okay. Can everybody hear me well?
Yes. All right. Let's begin. Hello. Thank you for your time being here tonight. It's been a long time coming. We first presented an idea for downtown historic district, a few years ago at our last joint council meeting. At that time it was very early in the game and merely an idea. It was before COVID and it was built around the idea of large scale reports that had us requesting a great deal of money to be in our HPC budget We left that meeting feeling like we had the support of the idea, but there was a warranted hesitancy about the cost.
We decided to go back to the drawing board and begin our own research through an HPC ad hoc to really take time to understand the area and the history, the need, and the benefits as well as the costs. Then COVID happened. In fact, COVID happened right at the early stages of our ad hoc And our next scheduled joint council meeting. Our meeting was scheduled just days after the city shut down at the time we pivoted solely to budgetary restrictions in this unprecedented time, so the project was created with frugality in mind.
One of the positive things to come out of COVID was time, lots of time. Brian Craig and myself through regular Zoom meetings met often to work to understand the area in every structure in it. And when we had scheduled HPC meetings, we gave updates. Jump ahead to this evening and the presentation before you is much different than the one we presented three years ago so much so that we ask that you look at it with fresh ears and eyes The first item to discuss is the map you have before you.
This is a working map that we feel best represents our research for downtown historic district. The map is shown as the entire district currently being discussed here tonight, west to east it's the phone company building through the Nordoff grammar school property north to the Thatcher library and south to the Ojai jail There are three types of structures within the proposed district, contributing landmarked, contributing historical and non-contributing. So we are using the same language. Let me explain each of the three.
Generally speaking, contributing means the property contributes through its own history to the fabric of the district and non-contributing means it doesn't. It's either too new, too altered or simply lacks the historical significance needed to be contributing We decided the most cost-effective way to do a downtown historic district would be to anchor the area with already landmark structures. By anchoring the proposed district with existing Ojai landmarks, we were able to get a good idea where the downtown historic district would make the most sense. Starting with our landmarks there would be no question of the contribution they would make to our district.
Currently, there are 16 landmarks in the prospective downtown historic district map. Those are in our first category of contributing buildings we call contributing landmarks on the map they are an orange and they are sprinkled throughout the district. The next set of contributing buildings are contributing historical. These are historical structures that our ad hoc had agreed through extensive research, that they substantially contribute to the history of Ojai's downtown and currently there are 44 of these structures and they are in gold in the map.
Each structure has been researched until all routes were exhausted. And either it represented itself to be, and there'd be enough information to be a contributing resource like Bill Baker's Ojai Bakery building or defaulted to be non-contributing. Properties in the proposed district must meet at least one criteria to be considered contributing, and some meet many. A criteria like Criteria E for example would describe its embodiment of elements of design details materials or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant Through discovery, we learned that many of these historical structures already had historical reports either by the property owner or the city. They also might have reports done by the County of Ventura for their research on Ojai's history.
These structures are resources seeped in Ojai history with good documentation which includes information from the Ojai Valley Museum The Ojai newspapers through the years and the Ojai history website maintained by local historians through published articles and thorough interviews with longtime residents, as well as being well documented in the historical books published on Ojai history.
At the end of the day, if our research didn't produce enough well-documented information then the property was deemed non-contributing structure. We struggled with a few properties understanding that they brought some history to the district like the Susan Cummings Bliss Yogurt Building others though were more obviously non contributing like the Chevron Station So non-contributing properties are gray on the map and they are structures that are included in the downtown historic district based solely on their geography. And as you can see here, they are mostly concentrated behind the arcade and in the blocks of Matillaha and Aliso.
They're either built after the 1950s, are clearly not associated with a downtown's historic theme or they do not meet the definition of a character defining element of the district. Our historic core has been an important resource for the people of this valley for generations, from our valleys deep history of the Chumash to its strong ties to the Mexican ranching community. Families put their roots here because they understood its value, it's beauty and significance And Ojai's downtown grew out of a desire to build community.
As the city celebrates its centennial, we can follow the path of these last 100 years to know that the architecturally rich downtown that we know today happened in large part of a Sandipetus partnership with a generous winter resident. By 1914, Edward Drummond Libby and the newly formed Ojai Valley Men's League set out to discuss ideas for improving the little dilapidated western town of Nordhoff and transforming the town to the beautiful city that stands before us.
Mr. Libby had clear ideas based in the city beautiful model, which promoted the idea that beautifying a city is beneficial to its residents because the beauty of a city would inspire civic loyalty and strong commerce and a sense of community to raise each other up and to create something bigger and more cohesive than simply a beautiful building or a nice park.
Libby's idea was to take this model used for large cities and adapt it to our small town while enhancing the aesthetic of its natural environment, one that was cared for by Ojai's original Chumash people. In fact, it is no coincidence that the towers, domes and arches of the downtown complement the surrounding trees, rocks and mountains. By making these harmonious decisions for the future of Ojai and its many inhabitants, the newly transformed downtown Ojai would be considered as a whole instead of by its parts. And Mr. Libby created the downtown as an asset to the future of the city.
Mr. Libby hired the impressive San Diego firm of Frank Meade and Richard Riqua to coordinate their collective efforts and to create an artistic, cohesive design. Meade & Riqua's Spanish-style architecture was meant to capture that old world look of California's mission days. Although mission style Spanish villages never existed in the 1700s, the new Ojai buildings were designed to look as though they had been built by the Spanish. Requa even instructed that vines should cover the new buildings to enhance the illusion that they had been here long ago in the 1700s. So, in a sense, Ojai's downtown business district has been an historic district since it was built in 1917.
By 1916, construction began on an arcade, a post office, a pergola and the civic center. These new buildings designed according to city beautiful principles transformed Nordhoff's ramshackle collection of aging old wet stores into a quaint Spanish village with unifying designs and themes based on mission architecture. Mr. Libby then challenged business owners to get involved by beautifying their own stores and properties, and everyone did. In fact, not only did the town merchants and residents rise to the occasion, but the county did as well. There was a clear acknowledgement that there was something here to be recognized. Soon, the county paved roads into Ojai. They brought in better infrastructure, and the future of Ojai was brought into focus.
One of the first, Ojai was one of the first small town Spanish style city beautiful makeovers and good choices were made at the beginning. In fact it was such a success at the time that other towns began to emulate our mission revival architecture model even our neighbors in Santa Barbara. You can see Ojai's mission revival influence in other cities including San Clemente Rancho Palos Verdes Westwood and Rancho Santa Fe Downtown Ojai was built as the civic center of our town, and that is how it's continuously been utilized over the last 10 decades.
Years of celebrations, gatherings, festivals, parades all happen right here in our downtown. And it was done so thoughtfully that no matter what changes were going on in the world little was needed to change the downtown to keep it relevant. So when you're on Ojai Avenue, you are seeing the same sites that people saw a hundred years ago. And that's miraculous through two pandemics fires earthquakes war in progress our downtown still stands as it did 100 years ago because generation after generation of business owners and property owners and city council members mayors neighbors and stakeholders through many changes believe that this was worth preserving And miraculous is the perfect word to describe it. The Libbey Park pergola was demolished in 1968, but entirely rebuilt in 1999 because of a renewed understanding and appreciation of Ojai's rich history.
And it was done consistent with the secretaries of the interior standard for reconstruction using the original designs. There was also a time in 1990 where the whole arcade almost came down. How detrimental that would have been to the charm the draw and the appeal of our entire downtown. So here we are, and we might walk away this evening in agreement that the downtown is worth preserving to keep Ojai unique and beautiful and valuable and historic but what about the next commission or city council? What about 20 years from now? What about 50 years from now? That is why now is the perfect time while celebrating Ojai's 100th anniversary to formalize a Downtown Historic District. Let's talk about why.
I know a lot of people will automatically think, oh no more red tape, more mountains to move when you want to do anything in a historic district. But the reality is you will find more lenient building codes, more access to tax credits, more flexibility and protection. Let me explain. In most cases, property owners already face rules regulations and guidelines for structures in the downtown area. And it's often often cumbersome and confusing streamlining the overlays and guidelines within a historic district puts the regulations all in one place making clean and concise.
Historic contributing buildings are currently part of the overlay and follow guidelines that have already had them coming before the city, as well as the HPC for input. Our landmark structures also have a set of rules and guidelines and often taking advantage of Mills Act tax incentives Speaking of incentives, there can be financial incentives for contributing property owners in a historic district. The city can provide incentives like reduction in permit fees. Also there are ways for the city to adjust tax code for contributing properties and historic district so contributing properties could apply for the same Mills Act tax credits that currently only available to our landmarks Mills Act tax credits encourage property owners to renovate and restore some of the historic features that may have gone missing over the years.
And being part of a historic district gives property owners that extra push because historic building codes favor old structures with relaxed zoning requirements. The California Historic Building Code is one of our most valuable tools for preservation. It provides alternative building regulations for permitting repairs, alterations and additions necessary for the preservation and rehabilitation of California's historic resources.
And the benefits don't stop there. Property owners have available to them federal tax credits, not a deduction but $1-$2 tax credit of 20%. There's also a relatively new incentive from the state of California, historic tax credits up to 25%. These federal historic tax credits can be combined with California's historic tax credits Our property owners can apply for these incentives and tap into these financial resources of up to 45% in tax credits to restore and rehabilitate their properties.
This couldn't be more timely as we have three anchored properties in our historic downtown right now that can utilize these savings. The El Roblar Hotel, the Ojai Theater and the Nordoff Grammar School. These historic preservation tax incentive programs encourage private sector investment in the rehabilitation and reuse of historic buildings. It creates jobs and is one of the nation's most successful and cost-effective community revitalization programs.
Of course, rehabilitating and usage of tax credits would be voluntary. But when property owners and merchants are part of something bigger such as a historic district it comes with the town pride just like 100 years ago when the downtown had its makeover shopkeepers and property owners rose to the occasion and created a cohesive and beautiful downtown experience And beyond free reductions and tax credits, there are other factors that make being part of a downtown historic district valuable. Merchants do well in historic districts by choosing to form their own group like merchants of the Ohio Historic District so instead of thinking of themselves individually they can market themselves as a whole saving money reaching a larger base and increasing sales.
Historic districts are known to have a positive impact on both residents and tourism. There are even social and psychological benefits from living and working in historic districts. Tourists that search for quaint historic towns look to immerse and educate themselves in its history because structures in the historic district become alive, and they tell their story.
And for the historic district's non-contributing structures, we might ask that the changes be brought before the HPC but 99% of the time those changes wouldn't be an issue. The requirements would most likely be the same as they are now. A non-contributing property in a downtown area would already be in talks with city planning if they were considering a large scale project.
The location is already bound by zoning and regulations. For a historic district non-contributing property, we would simply need it to be appropriate and complementary and compatible in size and not distract from the historic character of the district. And that doesn't mean a new structure or remodel should even be in the Mission Revival Spanish architectural style In fact, it's fine that it isn't. I know the city has a long standing guideline about Spanish architecture in the downtown but really you should be able to look at a historic district and know what's contributing and what isn't for the City of Ojai to have a Downtown Historic District means that we won't have to run out and landmark contributing buildings because the district itself would create a preservation umbrella collectively they have meaning until Ojai's rich history Creating a historic district can keep Ojai valuable, strengthen neighborhoods, provide an incentive for rehabilitating historic buildings and promote a sense of neighborhood and community pride.
The preservation of Ojai's past is a key to building a prosperous and sustainable future for Ojai's economy. So what would make Ojai downtown a historic district? What is the criteria and how do we know for sure? Well, as we've shown you this evening from our research and documentation, we have every reason to firmly believe that our downtown is worthy of historic district designation. Luckily though, you don't have to take our word for it. We have an incredible 242 page document made for the city of Ojai that backs it all up.
A refresher, if you haven't had a chance to read it. The city of Ojai wanted to make improvements for pedestrian and bicycle safety on Ojai Avenue. Because there would be use of federal funds to do this, it triggered a bunch of necessary reports on the area. In fact too many to list now but you can find them on page three of the Caltrans document. Many of these reports focus on historical resources and list the big guns in preservation, including the California State Historic Preservation Office, the National Register of Historic Places and the California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA. It's an incredible find and we are so grateful to get our hands on it!
This document is well worth the read and I promise you, you will learn something. I know we all did what's most interesting about this professionally and thoroughly research report that came out in April of 2018 apart from the fact that the HPC never seeing it is that it came to the conclusion The same conclusion as our HPC ad hoc, that our downtown is a historic district. The difference is we looked at it for local historic preservation district and the Caltrans document determined our downtown to be eligible for both nationally and state of California recognized historic districts which is pretty incredible.
Which explains why although the maps have the same shape in much of the same information Our HPC ad hoc map covers a slightly larger area because criteria for local landmarks will usually be different from national landmarks. Our dates of significance are also different from local downtown historic district, ours are from 1874 to the 1950s while the Caltrans document honed in on the dates of significance being 1917 to 1929, the Libby period of transformation to Spanish revival architecture.
In fact, the State of California Office of Historic Preservation concurred with the Caltrans Report findings. As a result, Ojai Downtown Historic District is now listed on the California State Registry as a recognized historical resource. What we have here is the glory, but without the financial benefits. So now it's our job to take our research and the conclusion from the Caltrans document and to give formal local historic district status here in order to help property owners ask excess tax benefits and incentives.
It's most likely that what we have here is a district within a district. A National Historic District would be part of our Local Historic District, one that focuses on a more defined narrow scope of history which has already been evaluated and found eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Our local district would reflect the growth and development of the downtown from the founding of Nordhoff to the historic area covering more themes and more periods of history and architecture than the Caltrans defined district, which focused once again on Libby's vision and transformation to the Spanish revival architecture. But our focus tonight is a local historic district over the next months, our ad hoc can review and research the state and we can't see the last line on this, the state and national historic districts but what we wanna do is focus on this tonight.
This is what we're here to talk about So what we are hoping for this evening, we would like to have council support to formalize a historic downtown. Not only has the HPC ad hoc produced solid thoroughly written research documentation that our downtown is worthy of designation of an historic downtown but we have an independent agency report created for an entirely different reason and purpose come to the same conclusion, a wonderful if not incidental by-product So what's next? Well, assuming we do have your support. We would like to be ambitious with this and create a timeline that gets this to you for vote no later than June so we can honor Mr. Libby as well as the citizens of Ojai's past present and future. And to get this done before our year long centennial celebration ending this August.
So at our February HPC meeting, we will deal with any boundary or other issues and prepare the documents for recommendation to council At our March HPC meeting, we will have a public hearing and make a formal recommendation to council. That will start the clock. We will then have up to 90 days to assist the development director in any way we can to get notices out to affected property owners, hold public information meetings, educate property owners, shopkeepers and other stakeholders. By the end of May, we would like to see this on your agenda. And if we've done our job here, our nomination will be adopted by resolution as Ojai's Historic Downtown District.
So today, 100 years later the responsibility rests upon us. The city of Ojai local businesses and townspeople have discovered the importance of preserving this downtown. A formal historic district will not only provide guidelines for protecting the historic architecture that already exists but it will provide guidelines for future development of the downtown to ensure compatibility with its character and vision On August 5, 1921 the city of Ojai was born in part to ensure that the seed that Edward Libby planted a beautiful historically themed commercial district would be nurtured as the city grew and prospered. And now the question is can we use this centennial as a catalyst to formalize this and get it done? Because if we don't then who will?
Thank you.
0:27 – 0:3423 turns
Nicely done.
It was absolutely beautiful, so beautiful it's just it's so inspiring
and fabulous presentation I can tell there's a labor of love and professionally done lovely
you live in a beautiful place
yeah
thank
you so much Gina stunning very interesting informative And I love the whole idea of wrapping around the centennial. It just feels very auspicious and timely.
Absolutely.
Mayor, how are we going to do this? Are we going to do a round robin or are we gonna ask? How would you like to proceed?
So Brandy let me jump in here if the mayor doesn't mind Thank
you.
Great, thank you. So what does the historic preservation hope to come from this two things appear on the agenda. The number one item is the designation of the Ojai Downtown Historic District, it is that this better commission and committee have been working on in our we are asking for your support and moving ahead. With that support as outlined in the slideshow,
we will move to our next HPC meeting and going forward again as outlined in the slide show. This is recorded so you can always go back to it and verify. We hope to see this process completed within the 10 years. So we are asking for a Approval of the council as much as they can to share with us tonight so we can proceed again on the schedule that Gina outlined for us.
Second, as mentioned in our slide shown in the downtown historic district map, the areas of the Nordoff Grammar Schools included. This is a lower priority but in light of current discussions affecting our community we felt the need to raise this to a public preservation discussion as regards our community. For your information, the original Nordoff Grammar School landmarking vote took place with the City Council on November 28th 2017. I spent the afternoon watching it and appreciated your comments. We have this on the agenda to get guidance from the City Council on the HPC proceeding towards extending the landmarking of the buildings behind the existing landmark going all the way back to the kindergarten building. As stated, there are benefits for our land marking properties both at county state and federal level monies and nonprofit groups that come in in enabling restoration and preservation.
Commissioner Convery has recently had discussions with key personnel, and she is happy to share that information with you. Again, what we ask of you is the endorsement to move ahead right away to assist in any way we can to establish a downtown historic district in this Ojai Centennial. Secondly, we asked for guidance on moving forward or not towards extending the Nordoff Grammar School to include the buildings and land along Montgomery from Ojai Avenue to Aliso Street.
But first, Ask questions of you and talking with the mayor today, I would like to offer the opportunity to question first to Mayor Sticks. And then she said you folks will work it out.
Thank you, Brian. Much appreciated. Would it be possible to unshare your screen?
Are we are we done? Do we is does anybody did they write in any slide numbers down that we want to refer back to before I share
Good question.
Anybody? I don't. Okay, stop sharing. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Yeah.
Thanks. Well any questions for Brian or the commission from anyone? Randy?
I have a number, so I'm just gonna do some... I'm not going to hog the show here. I'm just going to ask a couple and then let someone else speak and just work my way back through. The landmarking of the properties within this district provides the owners of these properties, the opportunity to seek a mills. What's the term I'm looking for? A Mills Act or a mill reduction in their taxes am I correct?
Yeah, so um and I see Lucas is with us. Um what it is is uh for example uh an entity within that downtown historic district that is not a landmark at this time would then have the opportunity to apply for land marking and then be eligible for the Mills Act. Uh the way we've discussed it is that normally if someone was doing a landmark a historian to prepare our HRR report for
them. Okay, you're going too far down the discussion on that. I'm just kind of trying to keep things simple. The district creates a bubble around these buildings or these sites and then it's up to the individual owners of these sites to now ask for landmarking correct? And then if they They can or you can, there's two ways of doing it.
Necessarily because they're part of the downtown district that That's one of the advantages of a district is we wouldn't have to go out and landmark each one of these because they're part of the district. So what would happen is that the tax code would be dinked ever so slightly, so it's not just Mills Act landmark properties that can access these incentives but contributing properties in the historic district as well. And then beyond those, then we have the federal and the state which is $1 to $1 45% tax incentives that they can apply.
So I'll, I'm trying to ask to gather more information but i'll just stop asking you just get to my point. How do we know that any of these reductions in taxes on these properties are going to be shared with the renters of these properties?
0:34 – 0:4116 turns
Well Randy I think that's...
Just say yes or no or can we or can't we or that's none of our business?
It's It's none of our business because it's the property owner's determination when they're determining their rent. I don't think the government can step in and tell people what to charge, but if you reduce a property owners cost of maintenance and cost of taking care of the property that can reflect in the rent we can encourage it but we can't demand it.
Well, that's what I'm trying to say here is just one of the conditions I'm looking at is we're creating an environment where a group of people who actually own these properties are going to get a reduction they might get. I'm not going to say they are. They might have the opportunity to reduce their tax base. And I'm just concerned with if you listen to the business owners in this community They're already talking about high rents that they're paying. So how are we going to, so there is no assurance that any tax savings on any of these properties that get landmarked will be passed on to the renters of these facilities.
That's correct, on the legal side there is no guarantee that any tax savings is passed to tenants it would depend on the terms of their lease typically a lease does not pass through such savings if you had a triple net lease it's possible savings would automatically pass through but no there's no guarantee for it and one other point I should note as Commissioner McHatton noted The city's current Bills Act code only gives eligibility for Bills Act property tax reduction contracts to properties that are either specifically designated as a City Historic Landmark or individually listed in the Federal National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Resources. As I understood it, the request to Council to contemplate but not make any final decisions tonight Is to amend that portion of the city's code to also extend the Mills Act allowance to properties that are contributing to a historic district.
And I wanted to clarify that is, that's a requested legislative policy change that the council could make should it so desire.
So should have that been a third? Request on their bullet points, or is that just something again? That we
understand it's down the road. It's subsumed within the first bullet but I wanted to make sure it's understood as a separate policy change
I think too what needs to be understood is that you don't get these tax incentives just because you happen to have your geography in the middle of a historic district. It is because you are taking money and you are upgrading, rehabilitating changing features that may have been lost like there's one property that's going to be on or maybe on a future agenda that was in our in our last packet for our HPC meeting and it was the building in downtown that has the bank vaults in the back. And they're looking into doing a landmark, they might not have to do that if they are part of the district we won't have to sit there and and do each little store in the downtown district. They will automatically be part of um the landmark of the district and so they won't have to be individually done but the whole reason why would be to access funds.
So these funds aren't just to make it so their rent could be cheaper for their tenant, this is preservation. This is so they can take that building and maybe put original window back in or put the original drop ceiling remove it and see what's under there and you know spend money and that money that they're spending they can get dollar-to-dollar tax incentives back. So it's not just based on geography it's for a purpose this money It's earmarked for preservation.
Two separate things, one are historic tax credits and that's when you're doing work on the building. You can qualify for historic tax credits when you are restoring a landmark property. The other item is the Mills Act Randy and a property owner has to apply for a Mills Act and you have to be granted the Mills Act and then the county revises your property taxes based on that contract Um, that the only properties that can apply for mill sec or landmark properties. What happens,
Cindy I thank you for that because I just want to jump in there real quick on what you just said, because I was, I asked that is the is the districting a balloon over all of these sites. And I was told, you know then I asked you each of them independently have to be landmarked and then if they would like the meals act do they each independently have to do so.
No, if you're in the district you're already landmarked. So now I'm hearing that if you're in the district you still have to request for landmarking?
No, the district is a boundary that defines the historic downtown core. That is the neighborhood it's a boundary. Is that correct Brian? Each and each owner, you some of the properties are already landmark like chaparral some of the properties can be landmarked because they qualify. The owners don't have to pay for an expensive historic report it alleviates all that expense, you can have their individual properties landmark They don't have to pay the expense, then they can apply for a Mills Act. There are still a few steps to go through. They benefit financially, fingers crossed that they're decent people and pass it on to their tenants.
Does that answer it? That's Mills Act, that's not tax incentives. And then they benefit from tax incentives if they decide to restore the property You know, repair the roof that kind of thing you can knock that off your taxes, you know with a 45% knockoff rate on the dollars. So, you know there are two separate items we're looking at tax credits and Mills Act, which are property taxes, and those are continually lowered every year your property taxes are adjusted. That makes sense.
Oh, you're fine. Like I said, I have more questions on this.
And if I could add one clarification there again is noted under the city's current code only individually landmarked properties or state or federally individually designated historic sites or historical resources are eligible for Mills Act treatment. Extending the Mills Act to contributing structures within a historic district would be a policy change by the City Council.
Correct.
Thank you. Great thank you Matt
Other questions from council members?
0:41 – 0:5728 turns
Yes, Bill. You have a pretty ambitious, first of all I support this goal and the schedule And I, especially well thought out schedule. It's a real commitment for this commission to do its part on it in terms of the hearings and talking to the property owners and things like that. And I just, I guess I want to hear just a reaffirmation that you're ready to take on this commitment. It is a big one.
Looks like we're getting hands raised, so. That's reassuring because it's and I see this commitment, I see this passion, the sense of history. It was a real eye opener for me to read the Caltrans report. It really advanced my thinking and I agree it is time to try to get this done for the centennial.
We've been very mindful if not I'm putting the, you know carriage in front of the horse here and we're waiting to get the go ahead from you so there has been no mention of it. There has been no mention of public outreach. We were just holding off after tonight that I feel like you know that's when that's when we start that's when we start working on the public Education part of it, but we are ready. I've been ready for a very long time, but in you know waiting for this meeting through COVID and everything But just not wanting to To just have this assumption that you're behind us. We need to hear it from you too first
Thank you Mayor Sticks and then we'll go to you, Randy.
I'm just curious Gina since you mentioned that has have you gotten any feedback whatsoever from any of the business owners who've heard about this or? We've
kept it really under wraps. We have not we've asked all of our commissioners not to discuss it yet until we got in front of council and it's been an unusual time because of you know waiting this three years since our last Our joint council meeting, but we did not want to have the community discussing it until there was a reason to discuss it. OK,
good job.
Yes. I also add that I didn't go out to discuss it with anyone, but the owners of Porch Gallery are looking to landmark their property and they called and asked me for advice. And they would be thrilled to be part of this because it makes that situation easier And I also wanted to put a historic core in perspective vis-a-vis the Chaparral development situation, which we all just watched unfold.
What happens when you have a designated historic register or downtown core and when you're on the national registers that the city of Ojai becomes... It gets on radar of other places like the National Trust. And what I learned during the Chaparral situation is that the National Trust actually has a task force that's just designated to school adaptive reuse. It's a nonprofit, they would have helped the Chaparral School at no cost. They would have written the RFP, they would have provided consultants. These are all the types of things that downtown on the national register and on the California Register of Historic Places has access to so much Public Works and public government, that's not something they have to pay for. And I believe that the chaparral School District Ojai USD paid, you know, a certain amount of money to go through that situation that they just went through when they could have had that provided from these task force and public service groups.
So it saves them a lot of money. They're not city planners their school board members, they would have had planner step in, they would have had case studies on what to do They would have had an RFP written by a very professional group. They would have had informational meetings on tax credits and how to move forward. That's the benefit to Ojai, that's what owners look at. And when we go out to talk to people, that's the presentation. You know, that is the angle. The Raines family, Alan just having received the Lifetime Preservation Award speaks to Landowners on the arcade that really want to support this kind of thing. So just wanted to add that in.
Thank you, Cindy. Mayor Sticks? You still have more questions?
I'm just curious if in your discussion have you anticipated any reason why business owners wouldn't want this?
Well we actually have a business owner that's one of our commissioners unfortunately she's not here tonight so she has kind of been The token downtown business, she owns a business in the arcade. And so she has raised questions in our meetings when we've gone over this and brought that perspective to the meetings. But again, getting back to whether we have gone out. And I think as I explained last Thursday, we have been very careful not to overstep what we think is our responsibility and our purview. And in our thought it was to do exactly what we've done to bring it to the city council then based on your direction going forward to do everything we can to assist in getting the downtown historic district put in place.
Okay, thank you. So fabulous, thank you.
I did like to say that in our meetings especially our most recent ones with Commissioner Pribor there was an excitement among her and the people that she knows. It was audible that she wanted to get out there and start. She wanted to get a letter writing campaign. She wanted to invite every merchant to come to Libby Bowl when we were originally going to be doing this at the bowl And we were like, no, let's just wait till we get into council. But there seems to be an excitement at least coming from her and the people that she's reached out to. So I wish she was here tonight to talk about it but I did not...
She seemed excited. You seem like the merchants in the arcade would be excited to be a part of this.
Yeah, I would imagine super exciting. Thank you.
I've got two more questions. Listen, first of all, I want to preface this entire conversation on the fact that I am looking for every reason I possibly can to support this. OK? But I'm not 100% committed and you'll see why based on the questions I'm asking. So you saw the first one. And that's any type of savings, how can we think about how that's going to be passed on rather than increasing the value of a piece of property because it's landmarked and that tells me maybe I can charge more for my rent. So you don't have to answer that but those are the things that I'm thinking.
The next question is someone brought up, Gina you brought up the fact that as a historic district that they might be able to pull their resources and market themselves. We did the same thing with the T-BID and we did that for all the hotels in the area. And for some crazy reason, the past council decided to not support that function because one, we didn't want more tourists and we didn't want more marketing of Ojai. So that's a concern that I think you're gonna have to address as you move this ball forward.
And then the last one I have is, you're asking for us to say please go ahead and do your homework and come back to us on this. What's going to be the criteria for Do we want the district or do we not want the district? You know, are you gonna create a criteria? Is it how many people with, how many landowners in the district want it versus how many don't. I mean is there gonna be a criteria developed so you don't just come back and say, you know what they want it.
And
we
end up forever listening to people that are saying no, we didn't want it
There is something that's written in our code that tells us how to do that. From the time that we recommended, there are seven days where letters have to go out to every property owner. We can give them four or six weeks however long we want to have them reply They would write a letter back saying they didn't want to be a part of it. And if 50% plus one letters came back from the total of the people who are property owners within the district, then we wouldn't have this district. This
is... So it's the same criteria that was used for It's a little. Valerie, what was the last district that we did? Taramina
Historic
District. Taramina, yeah. And then there were some red flags in that discussion about how many people got to vote for bases, who
was on
the
D, I mean... Let me answer that real quick. So Randy, as Matt knows because we explained to all of the people that filled the council chamber that night what the current laws were at that time which were confusing. Very confusing. If you are a couple within joint tenancy, you got one vote. If you separately own the house, you got two votes. When we adjusted the code when we were rewriting that section Bill was in that group. It is now one property, one vote no matter how you split it up.
And the other component there if I could jump in is that also it's one property, one vote and that was intended to make it clear that the owners two, three, four whatever number of owners per parcel it's one vote per parcel and it is a majority designation. And that's tested at the time of the nomination as to who is on title at that time.
Okay, so can I circle back to the one thing that we have to acknowledge here is this document from Caltrans. This document made it so the state of California concurred with it that this already is a California resource. So like I had one of the slides said is we have the glory of that but the reason why we would like your support tonight What can we do with that information? Thank you so much. That's really awesome that we have this, but how can we help our property owners and our merchants to benefit from that? And that would be a local district so we can...
Go ahead Cindy.
The 40 top towns in America, the 40 best places to live in America. 90% of them are national register. They attract better quality tourists, higher spending dollars. I'm talking to you Randy, I'm talking about business owners in town. They attract better quality businesses that it just uplifts the entire town. You're not talking about people that slobs, you know coming to town and it just attracts a better quality visitor. And I want to go back to your question about the tax situation with building owners benefiting and then not passing those benefits along If a building owner, and you know building costs are high. You're in the building business, you know what it's like now, you know what cement costs, it's a lot.
If they can benefit and restore their building and beautify the downtown that benefits all the business owners. If a building owner is on the ropes and can't fix the roof and has to lower the rent and gets a crappy business in there, it drags everybody else down. So the point of having a business that you can't restore, and you got to have a poor owner and poor renter in there that can't support the town. You know it brings Ojai down we want to bring Ojai up.
We want to support good businesses quality tourists and quality products in town. That's what this is about. It's about making a cleaner better place just like
Libby planned a beautiful place And as far as what I was saying about the merchants starting their own group, I mean the idea would be let's say on Facebook they want to advertise that they're going to be having some sort of you know Halloween walk or they're going to do something and it's not done by the city. It's a private group by the merchants that choose to do this if they let's say it's $100 to to promote a Facebook ad. Well, now it's only maybe a couple bucks each then it's reasonable they're still getting their word out there they're still getting shared they're still getting in everyone's feed but it's making it cost effective for them that was my whole idea of having these merchants work together as a whole instead of its parts just as the district is thought of as a whole instead of its parts but it's all it's voluntary thank you Jan
Bill. Yeah, please correct me if I'm wrong but one of my perceptions here is that given what Gina identified as the listing with California already is that's going to factor into any CEQA analysis of a discretionary permit anyway We might as well organize or at least give the green light to you guys to go and talk to the property owners, see how they respond.
See ultimately how they vote and especially pointing out that we owe it to them to maximize the benefit of that designation which has to be done by our actions doing nothing in effect puts the property owners in a more difficult position because it's going to come up in CEQA analysis anyway, and we might as well organize to deliver the benefits and the standardization to allow easier permitting and the tax benefits. At least that's how I look at it, and correct me if I'm misperceiving this.
Great
0:57 – 1:0510 turns
thank
you Bill. Yes
Mayor? Yeah and I would agree with you Bill. It just makes sense in terms of timing And also in terms of rent, I mean it may make rents go up. The only way we can control that is through rent stabilization which is a whole different issue that we can talk about some other time but that's all there is in that way so putting that out there thank you.
Great thank you Mayor. Let me go to Susan real quick. Susan, yes?
Yeah yeah listening to all this I'm in full support moving it forward it does seem that it will benefit the renters if the owners can maintain the building because I've had three leases in downtown Ojai where the roof leaked where we literally put our you know it was it was bad so if they if that can keep the help the owner maintain the building That will benefit everyone. And I'm just wondering because when, I know you've discussed this in public meetings it seems like does the Los, are the investors owners of the Los Robles Hotel aware of all this?
It seems like the sooner they're aware of it the better and you know it seems like I know you haven't reached out but have they Have have merchants reached out to you more than what you've mentioned so far.
So Susan, even though we haven't gone outward, As a commission member, if somebody comes and asks us questions, I tell people we can answer those questions. Tell them about the code different things where I tell them, I'm not going to tell you what I like, what I don't like. What's the best way to get around this? Because that's just what we don't do but Talking with different people.
I was contacted by one of the partners for El Roblor Hotel clear back in August and suggested some things to help them speed up the process. We did not know about the Caltrans report at the time that all started, but they do have a copy of the Caltrans report so they're aware of what's going on and Lucas has been working with them closely. Randy, just one thing I guess I'd like to equate to is that we recommend to the City Council on homes to be landmarked and homes to receive a Mills Act. We don't ask them are you going to lower the rent?
That's just, you know, not our part of the job but I understand what you're saying that when there's a savings please pass the savings down especially in today's era. But, you know, just kind of an equation there ready Yes.
What you charge for ransom is a moral issue, and it's individually owned. It's plain and simple. I can either make a lot of money off of my land or I can make a reasonable amount of money off my land. Or in some instances, I can give some of my land away and receive less. That's an individual issue. I get that. The problem I'm running into with this conversation about that is, I keep hearing this word from this council about re-gentrification.
And then what I just heard was that's okay because it doesn't matter if they can't afford to pay it we'll get someone in that can. And we'll get someone that maybe brings a different product or maybe something that's better for us. Now, I'm not putting words in anyone's mouth but that's what I just heard. So I don't think rent is an issue here so I'm gonna drop the rent issue. Like you said, I am trying to work with this and try to figure out how this benefits us and doesn't break the backs of the people that are here.
So it befuddles me when I hear what doesn't really matter if they can't afford it, who wants a low rent payer anyway here? So I think we need to just think about this as we're working through the process.
So Randy, I think you've heard in the presentation and tonight is that we as a Historic Preservation Commission are putting this forward because it to us is the right thing to do. But perhaps key and more importantly as was, as Susa shared It is and we talked about it Thursday night, it is a way to bring outside money in or free money as we were talking about Thursday night. Free money in that's going to benefit the local people. I mean just as a quick as Cindy Comrie pointed out the school district And being part of that, as Cindy pointed, has resources available to them that they may not have been aware of before that can come and help them improve the process that they're trying to do it. And do it by nonprofits who are not charging anything at all because that's what they do is a nonprofit.
So I'm sure you can sense that for us is to make it a plus.
And Brian, thank you. I do understand that and I'm not trying to argue with anyone like I said, I'm trying to just bring points up. Anyone who is developing in this town the lots that we've talked about who doesn't do their due diligence it doesn't recognize the benefits that you might receive with California landmarking and And our local landmarking, then you know that just falls on you as not being a very smart developer.
My last question on this is will be my last question is the permitting process again Gina you brought up the fact that under this Quote umbrella, that there would only be one permitting process. And I don't understand that because you have to still go through our planning department to permit any type of work in our community. And if your property is landmarked, you have to get a permit through historic preservation. So I don t know how you are combining it saying well it'll simply become one when the reality is it's not, it's still two.
Well, it's not so much that it becomes one. Okay I'm just gonna talk about a merchant for example when we talk about our signs we had a sign go up that we didn't approve and the people put it up in good faith think not knowing that they had to come before us because there's so many different aspects of everything and what we were talking about as a commission was to create a document that says if you are a merchant in the arcade This is what you do. A, B, C, D and E. And these are where you go and this is where the permit is and this is what you have to do. This is who you've talked to and that is more of what I was referring to as making it concise and clear is more like creating a document if you are part of our historic downtown district This is this, you know, trifold or whatever it is that makes it so it's clear.
The this is where you go. This is what you do. This is when you need to go in front of planning. This is the word that permit business and under. So it's not just like they're heading this way and then it's like oh now we have to wait until they meet again and now we have to wait until that commission meets again and then they go back around. It's just show it's more just like having it make sense as a whole of what their responsibilities are as merchants, their responsibility as property owners to have this clear and concise understanding because there's so many overlays. There's so many things that have happened over the years that just there's a lot when you're down there already and it's just trying to make it so it's not cumbersome or time-consuming or expensive
1:05 – 1:1531 turns
Yeah, just a second Bill and this came up. This actually came up in a discussion that we were having that Jenny was there and she's like what? I didn't know that! Why don't we put something together for the businesses downtown here and we can give it to them as kind of a welcome package so yeah it was Jenny that started that conversation.
Yes.
Yes Bill
Well, just a quick comment is Randy. I think we're mixing questions about a final decision with what the commission's really just asking for is the green light to start the due diligence to do the process and I heard you say you were okay with starting the process So in that respect, I think if we narrow the question here, HRC is not asking for a decision. They're asking for a green light for the process and due diligence. So I would think we should at least agree on that.
Okay. Let
him, let him. Like I said, I'm not disagreeing, but I think that the whole idea behind what we're trying to do tonight is to give. Historic preservation to give that commission feedback and for them process and moving it forward, that they're taking into consideration all of our questions. And they might be preparing themselves because surely I'm not the only one that's going to have these concerns.
Right. And questions will come out of the process if we give them the green light to proceed.
Right?
OK. Ryan, I think you had your hand up.
Oh, Ryan. Thanks. Thanks, Brian. Well, what is this altogether going to cost the city to go through all this? Because there's a report that still has to get created. I know that was one of our concerns before and I didn't hear anything about what those projected costs are gonna be for us.
Okay so initially when I came before the City Council years ago for a budget submittal number that was to prepare pretty much the information that the ad hoc committee has been doing for OSBT, Curt Brown): Nothing but staff time who's been working with us because otherwise all of the investigation has been done outside with Craig with Gina with myself. Going forward, how much will it cost the city?
Again, Gina pointed out several parts where there are already guidelines in place that the businesses or locations have to adhere to. If somebody wants to do an adjustment to their landmark business, they already have to apply for the permit and come before the Historic Preservation Commission. So our thought was Curt Brown, OSBT-Karen Hollweg, OSBT- Dave Kuntz, COB
There's obviously going to be staff time, there's got to be an element of giving notice everybody. There's a vote which I was on the other side of Tara Mina and as far as I'm concerned I still do the city completely botched that voting and screwed over a number of residents had no clue what was going on. And it was really a shame because the city essentially admitted they didn't do it right and didn't give the people that were really didn't have an opportunity to be heard fairly any, any chance. But all that being said, I wasn't sure what other because when we had discussed this at the last joint meeting I don't remember exactly when it was.
There were, there are a number of like what isn't there like an official formal report that has to be done by like a story and not just by the commission itself or is that something I'm remembering? Yes Gina.
What we did originally I think when I tried to explain in the beginning of this which I hope I made myself sort of clear is that So, the way we wanted to do it before was to do like you said just some big massive report let's just start from this side to this side. Let's see what's historic let's see what's not. And we know we can't do that I mean the city can afford it is just not feasible.
Anchoring it with properties that already have the reports done. So we did those 16 properties, those are anchored properties reports are done we don't need to do them. Then the next, what is it I think it's 44 properties that are contributing those all have some sort of report done something Something in it, so we don't necessarily have to generate another report go pay money to have something done. If there if you look at it and that's why there's that printout that backs up the map. If you look at it and go You know what I don't think that this is enough information will make it a non contributing because at this point We would rather have a district than no district, obviously. So it's like if it's going to hold us back because this one didn't do, we don't know enough about this information.
It's not formal enough then we'll put it in non-contributing but the idea is all of this information is already out there so we don' need to repeat it again. There are reports done on these properties that are in this district And the ones that aren't are non-contributing. So we don't have to start with some massive thing.
James, go ahead. If I could just jump in regarding a couple of the costs and I understand What Commissioner McPatton just said. So if we didn't have to do a report, that would be one less cost. I just want to for information point out, I think the most recent historic report for one of the properties that we've actually discussed as part of this was $15,000 for that one property. So to give you an idea of how much it would cost to do an historic report for multiple properties, I'm sure there'd be some sort of bulk deal but That would be a challenge.
And then the other thing too, we are doing two Mills Acts on the next city council agenda and we did a quick financial analysis on those and I think our estimate at this point is that one of those is going to result in a $1,500 reduction per year and the other one I think is closer to $2,000 reduction per year So there will be an ongoing impact. I would say if we're expecting, I think we kind of ballpark set about 60 properties. It was 16 that were already landmarked so maybe 45 properties or so that potentially could apply for Mills Acts. You know it'd be close... If all of them did which is very unlikely but if all of them did that probably be another hundred thousand a year fiscal impact to the city Again, probably unlikely but those are the potential costs.
Other than that it's staff time and you know the time to have public meetings and outreach and noticing and all that so those are probably the biggest ones.
Great thank you James. Randy?
You know in this same thought process Gina you're gonna first of all have you discussed your thoughts about combining all of this. Have you ran this by our attorney? And two, are you gonna bring that request back to council that we waive the individual... Historic reports? Yeah, is that what you're asking? That's not asking anything that's in writing here today so obviously that must be coming because you're assuming that we're going to be willing to do that
I think what I would like to have you look at the document, that Google document that tells the backup that we researched over the last two years. What we did as Craig Walker, who's an Ohio historian and our chair Brian Akins and myself that we have decided that through our ad hoc that the properties that are contributing already have significant and sufficient information to be a contributing property within the district
without any further information.
If they want to go
through and argue that and say well I don't think that you can count this because, then we can start. But at face value, I'm very confident that the buildings that we included already have enough information.
We-
And Gina, that's a 16, right? You said that the number is 16?
Well, that are landmarks. This is the other ones, the contributed 44.
The 44?
Yes. So
you'd be asking us to waive the report on 44 sites? Is that what I'm hearing?
No.
To waive the reports?
Well, to waive the reports and to not do reports on them? Is that
what you're
saying? Matt, do you have any insight on this? I see Lucas there but I'm not sure whether he's able to chime in. So is it a matter of us waiving? No it's not us individually waiving we're finding out with the regulations Andy Pelster, Applicant Overhead,
City of Boulder City Council meeting
1:16 – 1:216 turns
As I understand the proposal from Commissioner McCattin, it is to rely on a variety of existing historic resources reports analyzing the 44 contributing structures at various states and times. And not to do a new report but to rely on the existing reports. I haven't reviewed the reports yet because we've been waiting for direction from council to do anything at the staff level presuming that the reports are recent enough to still be valid Or are not otherwise problematic, then that would strike me as likely a defensible approach.
You heard a couple of weasel words in there because I haven't looked at the reports myself so nor has staff reviewed them yet. We'd have to review it and we would identify which if any would need an update. And then again it would be subject to council's choice.
Valerie I think you had a comment let me just put this out. So one of the items that was sent to you was this David Gerrold, PB – He, Him, His): Two plus page document it lists every one of those numbers it gives you the address the wow. The date. Original use, historic period, historic contribution and then historic documentation with hyperlinks off to the right.
So I think this will give you some backup to why we're saying that we feel that there's a strong support for those 44 items to be historic. If there wasn't a strong support for those 44 items, then we would have labeled them as non-contributing. So again, this report was emailed to you by Gail and I encourage you look at it. It has great information. Yes Bill?
Yeah just a comment to summarize what I'm perceiving in subject of correction. If you look at all this work that's been done, if you look at all the work including the Caltrans reports and all the existing historic resources report, you look at that as totality then you combine that with the tactical plan that Gina outlined This is probably gonna be about the most cost-effective historic district it would ever possibly do.
And in that point, if this is something that's part of an important part of our city's heritage and character, this is like the most cost effective it will ever be. That's my perception.
Great, thank you Bill. Valerie did you have a comment? Actually I didn't. Okay yes Cindy.
I wanted to add to Bill's comment about what I said about Chaparral and the task force and the consultants that are available there are groups task force and others available to help Ojai navigate this without at no cost There, there's a Main Street USA program that will even provide Benjamin Moore historic paint for free to paint our downtown I mean there are so many resources out there. There's a California Main Street program that will also provide support at no cost these are all government programs so all we have is make a list of the things we need and then, you know I can make a couple phone calls and see what's out there that we can get at no cost. So it will be the cheapest historic district ever known to man, I'm sure of that but I also wanted to make a few corrections since this is a public meeting I wanted to comment on Randy talking about re-gentrification Which isn't a word we've ever used.
I mean, well, I don't know what re-gentrification is but gentrification is the process of changing a neighborhood. We in historic preservation have never ever used the word gentrification. We don't want to change the neighborhood. We want to maintain the neighborhood And keep the character of Ohio intact because that's the intrinsic value, just like if you had a classic car. You're not going to put like aftermarket parts in there because you devalue are so I just want it.
The first correction I wanted to make was about the tower Mina district because I was there, and I don't think Commissioner flats you're serving at that time. The majority of Taormina residents came to our meeting I think Brian Gina Valerie might have been there but Gina you weren't We had the majority of Taramina residents who were in favor of that. I'm sure there are still people who aren't in favor, but they weren't part of the majority and I think that was a very successful process. I don't know where the City Council made mistakes. I've never heard that And again, because you weren't part of the council at that time and you weren't part of the process I just wanted to point out that.
That was a really successful project that went through and the majority were in favor of it and it's boosted the value of the neighborhood and preserve the neighborhood as well.
I was incredibly involved in the process and I'm a council member not a commissioner. And I am well aware of it because I represented the people who got totally screwed over in the voting process, which is what happened. The city changed the voting a couple times. But we're not here to talk about it. I don't know why you brought that up. Well, I was very involved with it.
1:21 – 1:2929 turns
Yeah, well I'm responding
to what was brought up to me. But the one
thing that
has been A constant problem in the Tiramina district is the confusion over the additional level of bureaucracy and rules, whether it's been people trying to fix a driveway or fix a window. Or whether something was part of the district or not part of the district who they were and what they were allowed to do to try and fix things even trying to replace stuff on a quick basis when there was almost emergency basis. There's been boss rules from the city. The reality is the city isn't very good at dealing with Intricacies of community development rules interpretations of the building codes, we've done a piss poor job of it for a couple of decades and adding an additional layer of bureaucracy to the entire downtown district.
in order to preserve it where we've had a hundred years of it being preserved without the need for any historic district, without the need for having a whole nother set of rules and a commission to review everything. And the reality I think is in the proof is in the pudding that Ojai has done the most remarkable job of any community for preserving its history unlike any other community really around and it's been amazing but the necessity of creating a specified historic district where we're not even now going to attempt to try and get all the correct buildings in, we're not going to necessarily inventory all of them and all the problems it could possibly create. I don't know that all that is absolutely necessary where you know this idea that we're always under this constant threat of somebody changing the character of Ojai has just not occurred for a hundred years because we have a really good population not allowing that to happen without the need for What is additional government bureaucracy?
And the reality of these historic districts is all these tiny changes anybody wants to do. We had a hard time approving the color of paint in the arcade without it being an historic district. No we don't! It's just getting in everybody's way, we did that earlier this year. I had a problem with it while I was on the council. I
completely disagree. We have a list of paint colors that are approved that you can choose from. That is erroneous.
So let's start wrapping this up.
I would like to say that the difference between term, you know, which is basically applying brand
new rules to something that didn't have any overlays and guidelines is very different to the historic downtown that already has all of this in place these like I said in
my slideshow These things, you are already coming to planning. You were already coming before the HPC if it's something that's HPC. We're not really adding anything except a financial incentive and a unity about it. So all of those
things that we're good at which we've had 100 years of being good at which is doing the guidelines and the overlays and bad ads I mean nothing changes maybe we can fine tune it so those bad aspects Can be
fixed, but we're still they're already there. So it's not like a term you know where you were writing something from the beginning and no one knows exactly what's What's expected of
them.
Well, the termina had a set of CC&Rs covenants codes and restrictions that were already in place that the city codified exactly the same as so it was already in place. It was this added layer now the enforceability of those CC&RS was really a core issue I think and what really went down and why it was historic more than the historic nature of itself but again that aside It already had all the same rules and covenants in place.
And the new layer of bureaucracy and confusion that has transpired multiple times has been an issue with that. Now, is it overwhelming? No, but it's obviously gonna be a lot more consistent in a high traffic, high retail area than in a purely residential neighborhood that has no exit and very few people are necessarily traveling in and out of all the time. And that concerns me a lot. I'm not against, you know the downtown Arcade Plaza area has a number of distinctions that separate it from other parts of town including the plaza district itself But whether or not we need a codified historical designation to be able to bring this forward is a real question because the people I've talked to are much more concerned about the bureaucracy, the loopholes, the confusion and having another layer of individual kind of opinion when they're trying to make real Let's
let the property owners express themselves, Ryan. Don't presuppose. Let them be educated and let them tell us. Can
we get moving
on? I have a question to respond to. Cindy, I didn't want to get into a tit for tat with anyone here but let's not conflate the two issues Let's not conflate them and you just did. I understand clearly what the goals of what we're trying to achieve here with this designation, okay? I get that and what I was alluding to was the fact that someone made a statement that said if a poor person or a poor businessperson can't afford to pay in these properties now, then too bad. They need to leave and someone better needs to come." That's what I was talking to. So call it what you want. Clarify my words if you want. Don't conflate the two issues. There are two issues going on here. Okay.
What
Wendy was trying to say was more that there would be a quick turnover of businesses that, you know, couldn't survive because they weren't able to keep good tenants in because there were problems with the building.
Can
we leave
that subject now? There's
something I think needs to be said though when we're talking about the downtown historic district needing reports We had so much of this is brand new for us, so we need to wrap our head around it. But the H I mean, we've already had the report. We have the Caltrans document. It's already says that we're a California resource. We don't need an additional documentation. It is so amazing already and so worthy. It already can be state and national designation. So Those reports are done. It's a done deal. All we're doing is finding the financial benefits for our property owners and our merchants. Also, I got a text that Craig has been trying to make a comment. So before we wrap up, I would like someone-
We weren't doing
comments. No, we must take public comment. Okay, well, I'm just
going
by what I was told. We have to take public comment at some point in the process before we close the meeting.
Thank you for that guidance. And how about we take a public comment right now?
Yeah,
whoever's controlling that.
Mayor Sticks it's your call if you do want me to yes please thank you Gail okay and to clarify we in any meeting Matt can elaborate but uh public comments general public communications are always allowed on
1:29 – 1:3523 turns
Correct, however we typically take them once per meeting. So that would be the one- Exactly, yes. We could have taken them after the discussion item but it'd be fine now once-
And let me clarify a bit further. We are not required to take public comment on items not on the agenda as tonight is a special meeting. However, we are required to take public comment on the item on the agenda which is this, the item under discussion.
There, that.
I said it backwards. Must be confined to the subject at hand. General public comments and items not on the agenda but within the control of the city should be reserved for the next council meeting. Thank you. Great
thank you Matt for that clarification.
Thanks Matt, I said it backwards. Okay, I'll bring Craig Walker in.
Who
I would
love to hear from.
Craig, you should be able to speak if you are muted please unmute yourself and you can go ahead and you have three minutes
Okay, thank you very much everyone it's been a real pleasure to work on this project with Brian and Gina and the rest of the commission. I did if you look at the Caltrans report you'll notice that for each of the contributing properties there's a document that's about a page usually our landmarking documents are 40 50 60 pages But these are only about one to two pages. And they simply do what we've done in the spreadsheet, is go over what the property's historic contributions are.
And I called GPA Consulting that had done that and talked to one of the people that have worked on it. And I said if the city wanted to actually create a historic district And they wanted to maybe apply for certified district status with the state office, would that document that they did be enough what we have to spend more money and do more. And they confirmed for me that what's in that document would be enough to satisfy All those other processes. Now there's some his, um, contributing properties in the local district that aren't covered in the Caltrans one. So we might have to spend a little time creating those one page documents that summarized, but essentially it sounded to me from what I was told that it wouldn't involve a whole new report that my cost 15 or 20,000 is probably something that we could do ourselves.
Thank you.
Great. Thank you, Craig. Gail, is there anybody else in the public comments?
We have one more person. If if there's anyone in the waiting room that wants to speak, if you would please raise your hand, I'll go ahead and call on you. As I said, we have one more person in the waiting room, but that person is not raising their hands. So thank
you. Yes, ma'am.
So in terms of moving forward tonight we will be approving your schedule meeting the February meeting and the March meeting and I don't see any reason why we would possibly not do that it's incredible work really exciting what and it's just a huge opportunity for Ojai so um and the connection to the federal trust or the national trust sorry Cindy The, there's just it just opens up so many options.
So do we need a motion to pursue that tonight?
I ask you, I don't know.
I'm asking Matt and Jane. Yes thank you Madam Mayor. No formal motions required consensus is sufficient if as i suspect it's not going to be unanimous then a motion can be made to direct staff to work with the commission to move consideration forward uh to include moving into public hearings at the commission in the council mindful that that's not a final decision
Right, okay. So Council is it unanimous to move this forward in terms of following this path?
Mary before we go there I had one more question. Okay. What i just found interesting was and someone can correct me again a lot of this is new information. I just heard that a two-page report or a one page report or a summary on a site Is just as good as a 40-page summary that we require in our process? Is that what I heard?
I think with that, it's been whittled down to that so that 242 page document wasn't a thousand page document. So what we are seeing is the summary
So all I'm trying to say is if we're willing to accept the summary, why wouldn't we accept a summary when we ask people to do their landmarking? Why do we have them go through a 40 page dissertation which I love and I enjoy reading and it's insightful but it costs someone how many thousands of dollars. And now we're talking about a summary could be provided two pages and that's good enough for the state So Randy the historical report. I'm just saying we better rethink this you guys.
Yeah, I agree. I think some of those HR reports are just so repetitive and you know you're just going on the history, you're doing photographs, you're doing everything and you're getting down to the heat of it which is just the summary that we really need to look at to see if You know, if it's something that should be landmarked or not. But I
think that'd be interesting for the commission to take up and actually ask ourselves, can we do that?
1:35 – 1:4031 turns
So again, you know they bring the information to us. As Gina was saying just like a contract which is full of standard boilerplate not to demean you Matt sorry I go through about the first 20 pages and I'm like okay yeah seen that been there done that okay let's get down to the details which comes down Again, Lucas puts it out. He gets the historic resources report. He sees if it's sufficient and then works with the person doing that and then passes it along to us.
But again, it's usually full of lots of information that we've seen before.
But there's obviously something that if this Caltrans document was enough To have it be on both the state registry and the national registry, then we do need to ask ourselves that question.
We need to re-evaluate what we're asking. So Mayor if we need to make a motion I don't have...
Well if we have consensus we don't need a motion Randy.
So do we have consensus?
I'm a
yes.
No.
You asked the question let's just have a vote. Okay all right well then
well
I would... You guys gotta make a motion and second it first
Okay then well not if we had if we had consensus. We don't I'll make the motion since we don't have consensus to basically how state that as a motion is to approve the language as proposed by the city attorney for the commission to proceed with the process as described in Mr. Summers's motion.
Well, I needed to clarify that there's two issues here and we haven't discussed the grammar school landmark at all. So are we just voting on the downtown?
This is just a district, HPC having our blessing to proceed with the due diligence process.
On the downtown historic district. Again, when I introduced it, I said that the second one was just something that had come about and so we wanted to start looking at a possible process on that.
Thank you Brian for bringing that up. Obviously it's topical right now but I appreciate that You guys are paying attention and looking into things like that because we don't know what exactly is going to happen. So I just wanted to thank you for bringing that up quickly. That is a whole different, I want to make sure I'm clear too, it's not what I was discussing at all. It's a whole different topic. No this
motion is not part of this one. We're just talking about the downtown historic district. Okay
so we have a motion, we have a second. Can we have our roll call please
Roll-call vote 1–0 motion, we have a second. Can we have our roll call · 4 under review
Show transcript
Told you guys I was looking for a way to do this. I'm going to move forward but i still have reservations and I still have a lot of thoughts on them. That's a yes. Okay
Council Member Blatz?
Yeah I just want to say thank you to the HPC for all the hard work. I don't agree with making it a historic district so Councilmember FranC'ois?
Anybody have any final comments? Thank you so much. Historic Preservation Commission, beautiful work, much gratitude and Ojai is so lucky to have you all. So thank you.
Well thank you Mayor and thank each of you for taking the time and giving us the extra time this is as I started with this is a critical day we are at a pivot point or a crossroads I see that throughout the community. So we appreciate your time, your questions, your thoughts, you're challenging us. That's what we're looking for. Suza?
Do you need anything from us in regard to the Chaparral property?
No, we just wanted to introduce that. Mainly our main goal was a downtown historic district.
Is there a way that we can ask What we originally recommended for the whole property can be brought back to you on to your agenda in the future. So it can be rediscussed.
Yeah, we can do that. I think as a commission, you have every right to put it on your agenda and make a recommendation of council. Yes, I would welcome that. Yeah. Okay, Mayor. Thank you
very
much.
Thank you, Brian. Have a beautiful evening and
I can see the full moon.