UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:0416 turns
Good evening, we have a
quorum. May we have the roll call please Gail?
Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 1
Show transcript
Thank You Gail and welcome all to the May 24th 2022 meeting of the Ojai City Council Randy do you mind saying the pledge this evening? Sure I'd love to
Right hand over your heart, repeat after me.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
And approval of the agenda? Motion to approve?
So moved. Second.
Okay roll call please
Thank you, Gail. And Mr. City Attorney, we have something to report out? Or you have something to report out rather.
Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. The city council met in closed session at their last meeting to consider two items. One was labor negotiations regarding all unrepresented employees and no reportable action was taken. And second was regarding a lawsuit filed by William Bradley Tully against the city and the council provided direction to defend the lawsuit. Thank you.
Thank you, Matt. And no presentations or
Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 1
Show transcript
commission reports tonight? Correct James? I would like to take a moment of silence. The council would like to take a moment of silence to recognize and support the town of Uvalde and Robb Elementary School in Texas where 14 children were shot today and one teacher. And just to quote Gandhi, nonviolence is a supreme law. By it alone can humankind be saved. So let's just take a moment here in solidarity for that community.
Thank you Mayor.
Thank you all.
Mayor, I have one more thing to do. It's Councilman Francina's birthday tonight and I know I didn't bring her a cupcake or a cake but I still think that we can acknowledge this wonderful woman and her contributions to this community by singing... Happy Birthday to You! Happy Birthday to You! Happy birthday dear Azusa,
happy birthday to you!
Thank you Randy for doing that
and I'd like
to reiterate and thank you so much for all that you've given to our community for so long.
All right. Well, let's move on to public communication.
Any public communication?
I'm sorry. Public communication, we have Nick Otway, Jeffrey Starkweather and Bill Miley. Good evening
and happy birthday.
0:05 – 0:105 turns
My name's Nick Oatway, I'm a local architect. I first laid eyes on Ojai when I was about 10 years old and then several years later after I'd finished or was working in architecture school my folks moved here in 1967 I've been interested in the town as an architect and visually for a long time. And I'd like to say, I really take my hats off to all of you working law enforcement working on the city council Because you have to do two things which seem so opposite.
You have to protect what's here and sort of the culture, but you also have to have the eyes to look a little bit beyond and see what's happening. And of course today in all our lives, however long we've lived there are tremendous pressures that are outside of Ojai that are affecting how we need to look just over the horizon and that is Climate change is one of them.
And the effect of our finance system creating a tremendous amount of wealth in a small group of people and a lot of other people struggling And we all talk about it. So I just want to, and part of that pressure has been created by our transportation system. The fact that most of us, in fact I'm sure all of us arrived here in an automobile and will get home in an automobile or maybe somebody was on a bicycle Susan, were you on a bicycle?
Normally I would be. OK. No, I barely made it from the top of North Sea.
Anyway, I just wanted to make a word in your heads for looking just beyond today to a town where there are more people can do more of their life without having to get in a car At least five days a week, not every day, not every moment. But have choices as adults. I mean we have 31 flavors of ice cream when we go to the ice cream store. We have one way of getting around most of us. That's something out of whack there.
That's why five years ago when I was talking to the school district board or slipping in my plan to their school district site, which is just down the road and such an important part of downtown. This is a sketch. Thank you. Yeah it's just a little And I think Ojai will soon get to a point where having a street, however short or long or whatever that's just for people on foot.
To get home, to get to their work loft, the work apartment loft, Get to school, and we'll be very much right in the present moment of solutions to the town. So I just want to leave you with that. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Nick. Could you point us to the street or describe
it? OK. This is just a wild little thing that I made for myself So that I could understand. It's the school district site and the little curvy dark street is a pedestrian street. The blue? The blue is the creek right next door which the city has to figure out how to have water running And the pedestrian street leads off from Matilla High and ends up at the bus going to Ventura.
And people would live in the street, there would probably be coffee shops at one end or the other and it would be a real bus station not just a bench. But this might be five, 10 years down the road but it would be something worth considering
0:10 – 0:1916 turns
Thank you
Nick Nick I'm allowed to Nick. Hey, I've got a comment. I love your comment about a real bus station because I have seen those in Oregon where it's not our shameful bench in front of Bank of America with no shade, you know It looks like it almost looks like what how can I say? Like a courtyard in a beautiful high-end library or something and people are very comfortable while they're waiting for the bus and it's it's all it's all kinds of people not just the ones without cars as people who choose to The convenience of public transportation and for that to succeed, we all know it has to be as comfortable and convenient as a private car. And we don't have a choice because we have a narrow two-lane road I just wanted to briefly state, Pete, we didn't have a presentation tonight.
Thank you for yours.
Okay, next we have Jeffrey Starkweather and then Bill Miley and Thank you for sticking to the three minutes appreciate it
Good evening City Council members citizens mayor And happy birthday. I May go back as far as anybody in knowing Sousa because we went to high school together
I knew your sister in elementary.
That's true, she was four years younger but yeah anyway the and I also want to support what Nick is talking about about walkability so I'm a big believer in that by the way we when we came to Ojai we gave up one of our cars we have one car my wife and I share it I use it most of the time because I go to meetings, but she actually goes to meetings in her pedicist.
So anyway, it can be done here at Ojai. Reflect and ask, I know Mr. Weyrich is going to speak to this but I spent two very long nights at two school trustee meetings and spent long hours preparing for them. But we've gotten this issue of the swimming pool and it was stated to me numerous times by officials, I won't mention names That, oh we're not including the town in any kind of programming because they said they didn't want to participate which I thought that can't be true from knowing you all. Anyway, I just found out today that comment came about from a time before the current superintendent was even here Some of you may not have even been on city council then. I don't know, but it's kind of...
So I think the issue is around whether we have a 35 meter pool that just serves the high school or we have the 50 meter pool which is what they promised us during the campaign and aquatic community aquatic center. Now I've been arguing that we need a feasibility study so we can understand the costs of both How that would be programmed and whether it's even feasible with the operating costs, because they are expensive.
But one of the key things as the design people say, programs before design. And we have been dealing with designs before program. So you have a rec department and I know Bill is going to talk about this but I think this is a great opportunity for the rec department, the rec board And this board to talk about what kind of programming could be held at that community pool and make it a community assets. And it might even be something that attracts students to our school system, which would be really the only sustainable way we can finance our schools because most of our funding comes from states, $15,000 per student and coming up with schemes to make money without adding students. is not a long-term solution, so thank you.
Thank you, Jeffrey. Next we have Bill Miley.
Good evening. For the record my name is Bill Miley. I have two items. First, I have a secret about Sousa. How...
Those are going in my memoir.
Long! Not how old. How long she's lived in Ojai? 66 years. That's a really nice number too. Second item is about the school board's school district bond program to build a community aquatic center. As a community invested citizen, I recently have participated in two school board meetings on the 11th of May and last night. Last night there was a robust discussion throughout the evening.
The value of making this a community aquatic center beyond the school district needs has emerged, in my opinion, very strong and many others think that too. Several past community efforts tried to develop a community pool and we know it didn't work. Now it seems likely to occur. The potential for a valley-wide collaborative effort to make this happen, I and others believe is in the wind.
Last evening there was a focus on the choice for school pool size location cost by school bond funds already approved and especially how the community use would be available but importantly the operating costs the maintenance costs and even more important the revenue sources to pay for it all With climate change heating us up, an Aquatic Center cooling is needed on top of all the inherent values that Aquatic Center will provide to schools, children, youth, families, swim teams, adults, seniors, folks with disabilities and others.
Several of us last evening spoke of the need value and motivation of our city government its willingness to become actively Excuse me. Supportive and involved with the school district to enable this to happen will benefit our whole valley for almost forever in the sense of the youngest of us now, it will provide 50 to 100 years of really good aquatic function for all of us in the valley. Thank you.
Thank you Bill.
Mayor, can I just note since that is the pool is the hot topic. I think at the moment so just note that we are planning to have a discussion on that item on the June 2nd parks and rec meeting. So anybody who's interested in listening or participating in that that that's when that meeting that items scheduled at this time
Great. Thank you, James.
One other thing. You know I've met with a school board member. I've asked this council and I've asked James to figure out how to do a joint meeting and the pool would be one of the topics And I don't know why these two bodies can't figure it out. We're not each other's enemy, and if anything the community at large looks up to these two bodies as the adults in the room and sometimes we're not acting like it. So again, I'm going to ask that we figure out how to do a joint session.
Wherever the TV is, I'll just look it in the school board in the eye and say you folks need to figure out how to help us out by meeting together and meeting the challenges of this community together and not at each other.
Thank you Randy. Any public comment on Zoom Gail?
If there's anyone in the Zoom queue who would like to speak, please use the raise hand function now.
0:19 – 0:2624 turns
Okay let's move on to the consent calendar. We do have two public comments so let's start with Janet Cull item J.
My name is Janet Cole, I live in Ojai and I have been a trolley driver for 13 years. The Ojai Trolley is unique, quaint and I believe essential to the culture of Ojai. Some of our riders use the trolley as their only social outlet. Many travel to the grocery store, bank, post office, hospital and medical appointments but for most the trolley is their only mode of transportation to and from work.
Over the last two years the trolley service like many other local businesses has suffered specifically With reduced ridership, loss of drivers and most importantly the inability to recruit new qualified drivers. Staff has done an extensive salary survey of nearby transit agencies and has outlined a plan to keep our recruiting ability competitive to attract new drivers and to retain existing drivers.
The modest salary adjustment the staff recommends is the first for the Transit Service in 10 years Staff has determined that adequate funding for this plan will be available from government COVID relief funds and will not impact the general fund. I know the council votes on many things with a city pocketbook in mind, but I hope you'll put a little heart into your decision. Come ride the trolley, meet your constituents Experience how needed the trolley is and how appreciative our riders are.
Please show your support by accepting the recommendations your staff has made regarding Ojai's vital community transportation service. Please vote for the trolley.
Thank you Janet, and thank you for your service.
You thank me twice a month! What we need is your support.
Okay, next we have Bill Miley and item L.
Good evening Bill Miley this is about items L the local road safety plan Because I am one of the two Ojai City representatives of the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Ventura County Transportation Commission, this especially interests me. With the city's contract grant-writing firm California Consultants ready to aid us in writing grants, this will be a valuable document once awarded $40,000 and the street safety study completed reviewed and enacted.
I especially want to see the review of our downtown Ohio Avenue results between North Ventura Street going east to Bald Street as in my opinion This really needs very serious study and adjustments. Vehicle congestion, vehicle noise, sit outside in a restaurant like Nick and I did yesterday and watch and listen to the trucks and big mufflers go by? It's just sad to see that businesses have to put up with that.
Bicycle risk, lack of dedicated bicycle lanes And something hard to pin down, what I call and others would call the gentleness of Ojai's ambience. It's not in the downtown area when it's busy with vehicles. It's not there. So I'm looking forward to the script. Thanks. Thank you
Bill.
Any
comments on Zoom Gail?
If anyone in the Zoom queue would like to speak on the consent calendar please raise your hand now use the raise hand function now All
right, motion to approve.
Move to approve.
I'll
second.
OK, roll call please, Gail?
Roll-call vote 3–0 Move to approve. I'll second. OK, roll call · 2 under review
Show transcript
with a special appreciation for Jay.
Council Member Francina? Yes Council Member Blatz?
Yes
Okay, thank you. All right let's move on to discussion items number two to ratify the appointments of the Arts Commissioners.
Yeah, and if I can just add real quick closing that out so I do want to say for the record that the City Council was immediately supportive of the Recommendations for the the trolley program. And so Janet your comments are Well taken and then I also just want to note that as soon as that was presented to the council is immediately supported So thank you for approving that Moving forward to the ratification of the appointments of the Arts Commission, arts commissioners. So we have moved to the new process and this is our first appointments for the Arts Commission under the new process where commissioners to the Arts Commission are appointed by in successive order by individual city council members subject to the ratification by the full City Council We had talked recently because we've been shifting over to this new approach.
And so the last time we had brought a couple of appointments forward, the council had expressed interest in having an opportunity for each person's appointee to come to the council meeting and give a little introduction of themselves And so this is the first where we are following that process and so today, the two items are the two appointments that are being made as Christine Steiner to fill one vacancy which I believe we have determined The for the term ending May 22nd 2022, but that term actually ended two days ago and is now in place until May of 2026.
And then a point so appointing Christine Steiner to that seat until May of 2026. And then appointing Nigel Chisholm to a midterm vacancy, which ends May 26th 2024. And it's a little bit confusing because both commissioners were already serving but with recent resignations they're being appointed in these spots and so it's a little bit confusing but we have both commissioners here to give an introduction and answer any questions.
Any questions from Council before Nigel and
Christine? With these two appointments, are there any other vacancies?
There are. There are two other vacancies I believe we received appointments for those vacancies and that they're going to be on the June 14th meeting but so this will have three appointed with two vacancies remaining for that next meeting
Okay, Christina and Nigel who would like to go first?
0:27 – 0:3510 turns
Thank you. I should note first that I had dental surgery this afternoon, but I didn't want to miss the opportunity to be here so if I slur or if I faint, you'll know why. So Mayor Sticks and members of the council, I'm honored to stand for reappointment to the Arts Commission. The Arts Commission as you know has had a bumpy year But it's embarking on a fresh start. We have new leadership, chaired by Nigel.
We have a new composition from 7 to 5 making us consistent with the other commissions and soon we'll have new members. And I've personally benefited from warm and productive discussions with Randy Haney and with Bill Wyrick and I'm grateful to both of them for their time. A bit about me, I've lived full-time in Ojai since 2013 so nearly a decade. I'm a strong supporter of the arts in Ojai, of the Ojai Music Festival, the Ojai Playwrights Conference, the Carolyn Glass O'Bailey Foundation, the Ojai Studio Artists. I've provided pro bono advice to artists and to art organizations in Ojia I have works of Ojai artists living and deceased in my art collection. I buy art from the two contemporary art galleries here in town, and so, in short, I'm deeply involved in the arts in Ojai, and I look forward to continuing my service for the city on behalf of the arts in Ojai.
A bit more about me, I'm an art lawyer. I represent artists, museums, collectors and entities that commission public arts such as real estate developers, hotels, public agencies and the like. And prior to private practice, I worked for large cultural organizations in-house And while the needs and resources of Ojai may be on a different scale from those entities, nevertheless this experience gives me an understanding of and sensitivity to the complex communities and organizations. And also the discipline to join my colleagues in carrying out our duties.
And so I'll just conclude by saying that I take seriously the duties that the Art Commission has under the ordinance. That is to advise and make recommendations to you on the needs, resources and opportunities in the arts. And to work cooperatively with the city and with arts organizations in promoting arts and culture in the city. To encourage and stimulate arts activities and to oversee the public art program.
So in conclusion as I said earlier, I look forward to continuing to serve and I thank you for my initial appointment and I look forward to my reappointment. Thank you.
Thank you, thank you Christine
Nigel
All right, happy birthday Susa.
Thank you Nigel
I'm not going to mention that you've been here for 66 years which is news to everybody who's watching now because i thought no way have you been here 66 years it could only be 36 at the most but uh hope you've had a wonderful day and if anybody deserves to come down here in a car instead their bicycle it's you today so that's good for you um all right good all good evening all Nigel Chisholm I'm not gonna speak very much about me as a matter of fact because frankly I know all of you and everybody out there on the tv if they don't know who I am then Where have they been over the last 20 years or so?
But I have got some prepared comments, so I appreciate your time listening to them. Mayor Sticks, Council Members, thank you for your continued service to our community. It's a tough job and you're never going to please anybody or even somebody if you're lucky. However, your time and energy in measure that most of this community will never understand The job that you do goes far beyond the bounds of Council meetings, and I believe it would benefit all if you took a moment to explain on camera the demands of your time over and above sitting in the chairs that you currently occupy.
I'm pretty sure everyone thinks they can do your job – they would be wrong. Of course with elections right around the corner They could always try. Tonight, having finished out my current term on the Arts Commission, I'll be re-nominated to a second term. I'm currently the chair as you know and I'm very honoured to have risen to that level. I am not entirely sure I deserve it but there we are and we're going to get it sorted out.
I am grateful to Council Member Blatts for his trust in me. I hope the rest of the council see fit to trust in me once again. Also tonight, Commissioner Steiner will be re-nominated by Mayor Stix. Mayor Stix you have my thanks and gratitude for her renomination. I'd like to make clear that Commissioner Steiner has all the tools necessary to be a positive and effective member of the Arts Commission.
Over the past few months, along with Vice Chair West, I've worked closely with her and I look forward to continuing that work together as we move forward on the journey of reimagining the Ojai Arts Commission and returning it to its rightful place as an incubator of the arts in Ojai and a strong friend to everyone involved in the arts or whom wishes to be so.
To our artistic community, I state clearly tonight that the Ojai Arts Commission is on your side. Our goal is to help you reach your goal in the best most positive and effective manner possible. We encourage you to attend our meetings and to speak to us about how we can support you. We will listen. Your commissioners and the commission as a whole will become much more accessible and visible in this community over the next year as we look closely at every area of our work and redefine it to meet its mandate We're all volunteers, but at the pleasure of Council we work for you and we want to work for you.
I appreciate the support of Council over the past few months as we brought the Ojai Arts Commission into line with all other appointed commissions. It was timely and it was necessary. As we move forward together it's imperative that we do not find ourselves back in the same situation as before. One of the reasons for the changes was that the appointment process was antiquated and not fit for purpose In large part, it was responsible for the challenges that the Arts Commission has faced over many years.
We cannot go back to a place where a single person appoints whomever they want to this commission. Changing that person from the mayor to the next council member in line does not alleviate that issue. The approved ordinance states clearly that the Council should consult with the chair when an appointment is considered. It doesn't say must, it says should. What we're talking about here is simply best practices.
I'd strongly urge all council members to follow best practices and consult on any appointments with the chair not only of the Arts Commission but of all appointed commissions. You should know that this particular chair will bring opinions and agreed options from all members of the Arts Commission as they will know exactly what is required to be able to do their job properly and address all areas of the arts as is their mandate Placing the chair of any appointed commission in the position of having to object in public, to a nominated individual due to a lack of consultation is unnecessary and wise and unwarranted.
I feel confident that the good cooperation thus far between the Arts Commission and the Council will continue. From June, the reformed Ohio Arts Commission will get down to work and we will make you proud of us. I promise you. Thanks for your time.
Thank you, Nigel. Any comments on Zoom, Gail? If
there's anyone in the Zoom queue who would like to comment on agenda item two please use the raise hand function now. Okay
let's move onto discussion. Quick comment.
I just want to say that I really appreciate comments by both commissioners and say that I'm confident that the way the Commission is going under the Chair's leadership is going to be a broad, integrative view of the Commission's role in the arts of life for the community. And I appreciate that very much.
0:35 – 0:4317 turns
I appreciate very much that both of you are here in person. In the past, where's Nigel? Oh there you are behind Gail. I can just see each half of you. Yes, I think it's important that new appointees You know, that we meet them in person or if we've already met them. You always learn something new by giving a little speech. It was really good. Thank you. What I would like to know, if I may ask, are you following Mark Whitman's? This is not meant to be controversial.
Attend or watch the video of the proposal from Mark Whitman for the Chaparral property and I'd like to send you the video link. I don't know if you know what I'm talking about? Yeah, I don't wanna make it complicated. But I think it's important to follow because there's a lot of community input and interest in one of many proposals to have an art hub at Chaparral.
So I did receive the video, I have watched it, and I am aware of what's going on with Mark and the other people involved in that project. On a personal level, I'm wholly supportive of that avenue of approach. With regard to the Commission, I can't speak for the Commission because we haven't yet taken a position on that. We have had conversations about it, and it is in my mind that we will have Mark Whitman and whomever else is involved in that project come and speak to the Arts Commission possibly in June or if not then hopefully in July to explain to us exactly what they would like and see how we can help. Or even if we should get involved with the support of that.
Yes, thank you. That's exactly what I wanted to know. Thank you very much.
Move ratification.
Yeah, any other comments from... I'm sorry. No? Okay. I just want to say thank you to Christina and Nigel, and loved your comments, and love the whole idea of the Arts Commission being an incubator, and thank you for your leadership, Nigel and Christine. You're clearly deeply involved in the arts community here, and what a gift to have both of you, so thank you. It's exciting. So it sounds like Bill has a motion.
Yeah, I'm ready to move ratification of both appointments. Second.
Let Randy second. Okay,
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move ratification of both appointments. Second. Let Randy second. Okay, roll call
Show transcript
All right. Thank you. Thank you for coming too and I hope you heal well Christine. Thanks Nigel
I'm sorry, I spoke so long. I didn't know you guys had already passed this but thank you very much! No,
thank you very much for coming.
Thank you. The public likes to hear that. We do have a trolley, we do have a choice. You don't have to walk. We do have a trolley that's been running for awhile. So anyway, thank you all very much.
We'll pass on the good news of the drivers.
Okay, yes. Let's do it. Okay
let's move on to item number three to consider introducing an ordinance to revise the city's gas-powered landscape equipment ordinance. Is there a staff report?
Yes thank you. Thank You Mayor so we actually had brought a report on this recently I believe was the April 12th meeting regular City Council meeting and We provided a status update after two years of enforcement of the city's gas powered landscaping equipment prohibition and we had talked about a few Items and the City Council asked us to prepare an ordinance on focused on those items. The three key issues was Item one was that chainsaws had not previously been included in the city's prohibition.
The prohibition was limited originally to hedge trimmers, lawn edgers, leaf blowers, non-riding lawn mowers, pole hedge trimmers, pole saws and string trimmers. So, we were asked to consider whether or bring an ordinance back with chainsaws added to that list. We also were asked to develop some language to make it more clear that the property owners could be held responsible if a Landscaper, for example, was using the equipment that the city could hold either homeowners, tenants or property managers responsible as well.
And then lastly, the third item was with language to increase the penalties for violations of these prohibitions. Previously, the penalties were $50 for a first violation and $100 for a second. With the $250 penalty for any subsequent violations. And so, staff has prepared an ordinance that does each of those three things. The penalties are recommended to be increased to $100 for the first violation $200 per second and $500 for subsequent violations.
That is the language included in the ordinance. The ordinance also includes language clarifying that the additional parties can be held responsible, and lastly, the ordinance includes the language related to chainsaws which we note we had identified two options. We ended up including option one in the draft ordinance. Option one for regulating chainsaws would be requiring a permit for any use of a gas-powered chainsaw Versus option 2, which it would be allowing a gas-powered chainsaw for heavy duty use. So only when heavy duty usage is required.
However the reason why we proceeded with option 1 in the proposed ordinance is because option 2 we started to realize that there were several Challenges with enforcement and so what we've recommended in the ordinance is option one, which would require a permit for any use of a gas powered chainsaw. And so the ordinance is prepared and is available for City Council to introduce. It would need to be introduced tonight and then adopted at a subsequent meeting, and then it would go into effect shortly thereafter. So tonight's item is for introduction of the ordinance, and we're happy to answer any questions.
Thank you, James. Any questions?
Susan? I feel a little bit guilty about this because I may have been the one that recommended some of this but I don't think I ever intended...I still want to have a warning without a penalty Yeah, I don't know how my colleagues feel. It's always fair to have a warning and then my understanding was that if they complied whatever they paid would be refunded at some point.
0:43 – 0:5430 turns
Those are options. The ordinance as drafted doesn't include that. The warning doesn't necessarily need to be in the ordinance, you know if we have direction to give a warning before implementing fines that can be something that we do relatively simply. I'm thinking through the other part and whether that would need to be in the ordinance what do you think?
If I understand the question would be if somebody uses a gas-powered chainsaw without a permit and then comes into compliance, meaning the next time they use one they get the permit. That's sort of a hard one to structure. The scenario where a landscaper, corporate landscaper who doesn't have electric equipment comes in and buys it, we waive the last fine. That's a bit more conducive to that approach for gas-powered chainsaw violation. I guess it could be anybody who comes in with proof of payment or proof of purchase of an electric chainsaw could have the first fine waived if only the first fine. That could be something we can structure
You know something reasonable where you know there's some cost recovery for staff time but we just want to give as much in my opinion as much motivation for compliance.
Gotcha I think that could be structured through it not in the ordinance but additional direction on how to enforce it
How to enforce, yeah.
And that would be to, because the city manager's already authorized in the enforcement process to waive a citation if circumstances warrant so it'd be to give that direction?
Yeah and we did do that. I'll just quickly know we did do that the first time around. I think the council directed for the first six months to give that option so we did do that. And so that would be that would be an option
in case someone is new or I just know that amount of money is a hardship but we do need to clean up the air and reduce noise pollution. So you have to balance those two things other questions ready
So we initiated this in January 28th of 2020 and regarding Councilwoman Francina's statement about how to encourage people To do this versus discourage them We've given them two years Of a lot of leniency And and so the so the question would be You know, I'm gonna save it and I'll wait for if there's any public comments then I'll save it for discussion
Thank you. Any public comments on zoom? Yeah, I **
We have no hard copy public or live public comments. If there's anyone in the Zoom queue who would like to speak on this item, if you would please use the raised hand function now? Okay
thank you let's move on to discussion.
So just to clarify, my statement is we've been discussing leniency for two years. And my observation as I drive through the community, I see more people using battery-operated blowers. I see more homeowners using electric blowers. So in other words, they're stringing up a power cord and they're using that versus buying something different. My concern initially when we started this ordinance is I wanted to start with commercial and bring residential along so there was a bigger learning curve.
This council at that time said no, we're going to bring everyone along at one time and that's what we did. To me if you want to affect change You got to remove gray and The gray is the leniency that we have two offenders, and I just think that we've spent two years doing this now And it's time that one. We hold gardeners not necessarily landscapers Although I do own chainsaws But I do not use chainsaws in the city of oh, I don't do a lot of my work is out of Ohio but um, but the interesting thing is The thing that I want to say here is we've bent over backwards.
And my observation also is that a lot of gardeners that aren't using these blowers and aren't using this new equipment are being allowed to do so by the owners that they work for or the commercial properties that they work for. And I just think it's time that we up the ante, and we let the public and we let the community know that this is for all of us. Not a specific segment, but for all of us. And if we all strive and work together, we are going to have some fruitful positive impacts in the community.
So if you wanted to be lenient, you might think of leniency in the finding process. But I think we're ready for step two and that's everyone get on board and let's get this done.
Bill?
Yes, I'm more or less leaning towards Councilperson Haney's viewpoint on this. I have no problems with warnings but after a warning if someone does it again I think a citation is perfectly in order and I don't think it needs to be refunded because they've already had a warning you know
When you're done I want to ask you and City Manager a question.
Okay, and then I'll finish my thought okay? And then I'm the strong proponent of option one because it simplifies enforcement You're not out there measuring the bar, measuring the tree and any use of a gas chainsaw is a burden on the community in terms of noise and air pollution. And you should have to pay a permit fee for that imposition of that burden of any size. So I like option one.
Okay. Ryan, are you good? Okay. Susan?
So Randy I trust you're probably more familiar with what's going on in the community with leaf blowers and all. Hopefully there aren't that many leaf blowers left but I guess what I was thinking is, say they hire a new kid and he doesn't know any better. Somehow the company that hired him or the owner, he's out there with a gas-powered leaf blower. He's the one that I don't want to have an immediate fine, you know, the new kid. I would like the company to be held responsible for not giving him the proper equipment or however that works.
You know when I look at this list of tools In my mind, why don't we just let things go more wild? Why has it come to this anyway? Because in the direction we're headed, what they're blowing is topsoil. What we need to be encouraging is enriching the soil and not getting rid of... There is a time and place to get rid of debris but I'm gonna read this quote If there's time, when we're all done discussing. But let me refocus. Yes I don't want some young person to suddenly have a fine that is very burdensome for them. That's all. So if code enforcement has discretion and you speak to them about this as long as they have discretion I'm comfortable with this.
And I would just agree with my council members. It's time to up the ante and they've had we've had talking about for a long time So and it is a burden on the whole community. So
yeah, I got another question so I'm trying to think through Susa's question regarding The leniency side of it Does the code enforcement officer carry around a data bank with him? So when he pulls over someone for a violation, can he look it up immediately and say you're a previous violator. Therefore I need to write you a ticket or how does that work?
Yeah, we don't have that right now. But what we would have like the way it's worked right now is we do have a database where we track everybody who's gotten a citation. So if we issued it, we could have the person come in and if they can show that it's their first time, we can waive it at that point. So that would probably be the easiest. I think what I'm hearing, and I think one way we can do it where it's relatively simple and easy direction for the staff would be the first time somebody gets caught if their name doesn't show up anywhere you have the ability to give a warning.
If they get caught a second time and their name pops up again, it's a citation. I think that's what we'd do.
So the other aspect of it is, is the gardener's at my house and is in violation and we write him for that. How do we write the homeowner at that point in time?
And that's something we haven't done yet. This ordinance gives us the ability to do it. And so we would prepare to start doing that. Once the ordinance is adopted, we will bring an item that will talk about creating the permit process and the fee for the permit and all of that. So, we will bring back some of the particulars of how it's done but the ordinance gives us the ability to do it. We would have to lay out that process.
I know, Mayor, I talk to a lot of gardeners who come to like Aquaflo or Ojai Lumber. So I'm engaged with a lot of these gentlemen and what was interesting is when we started with this, a lot of them didn't have the sense to say this is a cost that the city is asking me to incur which is buy new equipment And I kept telling these guys to figure out what that cost is and divide it by your hourly rate and add a percentage in and get a cost recovery. So, I said that and then the other thing we pushed for was having a line of equipment here they could borrow if it broke down And the other one was we talked to Eileen Fay at Aquaflo and we asked her to do the same, which she has. So again this is two years in the making I think as a community we've really done as much as we can to help gardeners in this community to have success and to be sustainable.
And I just think that we're ready for step 2.
Sounds like we're ready for motion. Bill?
I'd like to go ahead and move introduction of the ordinance to revise the city's gas-powered landscape equipment ordinance using option one with direction for due discretion for warnings on first offenders. For
a
second?
Okay,
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move introduction of the ordinance to revise the city's gas-powered landscape equipment ordinance using option one with direction for due di
Show transcript
0:55 – 1:103 turns
Thank you, Gail.
All right let's move on to item number four the 2022-23 budget workshop the proposed capital improvement program and measure C budget
Thank you Mayor. We're going to pull up, we don't have actually many presentations today but this is one so we will pull this up quickly. The presentation is fairly high level so I realize there'll probably be some detailed questions but we'll start with the kind of a high-level overview here And so this is our third budget workshop of the year. This is our capital improvement projects, including vehicles and equipment and our Measure C budget workshop. And so to start we kind of wanted to start with just big picture overview of the budget Although most of what we're going to talk about tonight is not general fund We wanted to just start with kind of a reminder of where we are with our general fund and so Going back to the first budget workshop.
We had we had Presented that our proposed our expected revenue for the next fiscal year would be at approximately thirteen point one million dollars Our expenditures were also approximately $13.1 million, and we were fairly balanced with a slight deficit of $40,000 but we've been able to work on that and will be coming back at the next council meeting with that fully balanced out.
And so just from a budget perspective, we have essentially a balanced budget expected this year. And the other factor that stems from that general fund budget is that we reported that the hotel tax, the TOT tax is at a record high level and why that's relevant to tonight is that means that Measure C is at a record high level to fund a lot of these projects And it also means we're able to do some of the transfer of the hotel tax to these projects as well. So, we have a balanced budget and a good amount of revenue towards these projects so that just kind of sets the stage for looking forward to next year.
And so we wanted to start with just a simple overview. As a reminder, these capital improvement projects that are shown are made up of mostly four funding sources. One is the Measure C 5% hotel tax increase which is expected to be about $2.5 million each year and during what we call regular years at this point. That's what the average amount looks to be. The second funding source is the TOT transfer, which we included in the budget this year at a 10% level. The third funding source is grants, which make up a large portion this year, larger portion than normal because of the bulk of a couple big grant projects like the ATP and the Stewart Canyon projects moving forward.
And then the fourth source are kind of miscellaneous taxes. The big one is the gas tax, but there's a few others that also can be used towards things like paving. So the bulk of these projects come from these four sources in our past before Measure C existed we didn't have that fourth source So the other three sources made up a much smaller budget, so our CIP budget was much smaller and we were able to do fewer projects than we're expecting to be doing moving forward.
As I mentioned that second item on the list, the TOT transfer. That is included in the budget this year at a 10% level which is $462,000 being transferred towards capital improvement projects. We recommended continuing it this year because of the focus on street paving and that's going to be the extra little chunk of money we need to be able to do the street paving that we had promised to do so.
So with all those four funding sources, the total budget of the Capital Improvement Project program this year is expected to total about $10 million which is a huge budget for us for capital improvement projects. We had looked back in the past and there were years where you know the budget was two million three million dollars And so we wanted to start by explaining this because it really speaks to the idea that we said this year was going to be the first year, now that Measure C is coming in regularly where we're going to be able to actually catch up on deferred maintenance and we're actually going to budget adequate funds to be able to start catching up on deferred maintenance. So this year is a $10 million budget. A big chunk of that is the ATP grant, about four million dollars but even without that the six million dollar budget remaining is a much larger budget than we've had in the past for these types of projects and so as I mentioned I know we can get really into the detail on this.
I'm going to try to start with a fairly high level We have a few categories that we've identified how much funding is going towards those key categories this year, just as kind of a high-level overview. The first that we talked about recently was street paving and that will account for about $1.8 million of the $10 million capital improvement project budget this year.
And that was the paving plan that was recently approved by the City Council a couple months back Second, the ATP which is mostly grant funds are actually for next year. It's all grant funds but that is $4.1 million. We also have $1.1 million in climate mitigation projects. Those projects include the Middle Stewart Canyon Habitat Restoration, the solar panel installation at City Hall and then starting to work on solar panel installation at the public works yard We have identified starting to move to the electrification of our city facilities as another project.
We talked last year about we had received a grant for an electric trolley, and then we were also planning to get an electric truck. The challenge was that, as I think a lot of people know that there's waiting lists for these things now because gas prices are going up. And so we actually are on the waiting list for example, for the first electric truck at this point but we've been told that that waiting list is about 12 months. So we do think it'll be next like in this fiscal year coming up, we'll get it but those had been in last year's budget and I think we're gonna get them this year So it'll be the start of moving to the electric trucks and electric trolleys.
We have budget included for, our funding included for two more electric vehicle charging stations with a plan that those would come back to the City Council to identify the best location in the next couple of months. We have plans for an electric charging station for bicycles and also to start replacing our electric landscaping equipment. That makes up the $1.1 million in climate mitigation projects for the city.
We have a $100,000 for tree maintenance and fire mitigation. We have $1,200,000 for parks which includes the Libbey Park remodel of the restrooms, the Libbey Park sewer line pump system which is in process, the Libbey Park pergola timber replacement. Some improvements to the Boyd Center, to the roof and the gym floor. And then I think the biggest chunk in the chunk we're excited about is the improvements to Sarzotti Park including the outdoor multi-sport court that we've talked about recently at Council but also the new playground and the moving of the trash enclosure at Sarazote Park plus the renovation of the ball fields. So, besides the ATP which is grant funded you can see that paving climate mitigation and parks. We tried to make sure that we have kind of the, you know, a similar level of funding for those three areas as priorities.
Then we kind of have from there kind of the next level of priority, which is Three sections, complete streets improvements. These are improvements outside of the ATP so the ATP kind of stands on its own but the complete streets improvements include the Grand Avenue bike lanes, some ADA improvements at the facilities or at city facilities, the bike trail bridge at the Fox Canyon Barranca A speed survey, sidewalk fixes and trip hazard reductions.
And so that is $220,000 in funding towards those complete streets and infrastructure improvements. We also have several parking lots that we're planning to pave this year along with our paving plans. So we're including the Rainbow Bridge parking lot, the Lower Libby parking lot, the plaza, the police department The park and ride and then finishing the public works.
I'm sorry, Emmett. I was thinking Lower Libby. The Public Works lower parking lot is also included and so that's $141,000 budgeted towards starting to maintain the parking lots which have been deferred for quite a few years and then another area that we're planning to do work, a lot of deferred maintenance work is on our city facilities We have $440,000 towards those city facilities which include a big chunk that we've identified towards the City Hall campus which would include catching up on the deferred maintenance on the buildings, the Kent Hall building and the Oak Tree House building.
But also to start doing some work, some improvements to the campus grounds themselves. We also have the gazebo and garden entry roof planned this year. The sewer repair at Little House, which we've identified as a more urgent need than we had anticipated. We've had some issues related to that so we're going to prioritize that one. And then we have some improvements at the museum, the chapel roof and the HVAC system at the museum. So I think when we had the museum speak earlier this a couple weeks ago they had talked about some improvements they needed those are included in the capital improvement project budget as well.
And then we have the paint in the re-roofing of the arcade as well which is another item that's been due. So those are like the big areas that we're focusing on. Like I was saying, paving climate mitigation parks and then taking care of our facilities parking lots and streets. Those are really the focuses this year as part of the CIP. We also have some funds allocated from the drainage fund to start doing some work on our drainage improvements We have the trolley stop that Councilmember Francina mentioned that is budgeted for this year.
That one item was budgeted last year, but the idea was to design it from scratch which ended up not happening and so this year we're going to move towards...we have a design for similar trolley stops and we're just going to move forward with one of those designs. That is anticipated to be included this year. Then as I mentioned, but because they're listed separately on the vehicle replacement plan, we are planning to have the electric trolley, electric truck which were on the waiting lists for.
Then one of our ideas was to start getting some newer trailers that we could hook up to the electric vehicles Because we aren't gonna go with the heavier duty, bigger gas vehicles anymore. So we have the start of getting some of those trailers to start moving over to that electric fleet so. So lastly then I'll take questions. We also have our equipment and IT replacement fund. I think the biggest thing on the vehicle replacement and the equipment and IT replacement funds Is that we're finally starting to invest in those again, I think. And when we have tough years it's always easy to cut the funding to those items and say we're not going to buy new computers or new vehicles for a couple of years which is what we did during COVID but this year we've made sure to include funding to start catching up on those things And so we have some cyber security improvements.
We have the installation of the new server room in our building here at the campus and some improvements related to that server room. We have new computers after we haven't updated anybody's computers for several years, And then a big one for the staff is the new hardware and software programs. For programs that can do better reporting, more accurate reporting and more timely reporting of the finance system, public records requests and the planning, Excel is the program for our planning department.
So I think I mentioned most of the others but we, I think the main thing was just that we are planning to fully fund those funds for the first time in a few years and start catching up on all the work that we had deferred when times were tough. So with that, the total of all funds that are included in the capital improvement projects are about $10 million. Like I said a big chunk of it is grants but another big chunk about three and a half million dollars is Measure C funds which was money that we just didn't have up until the adoption of Measure C so we're gonna start seeing the benefits of that this year and moving forward into the future.
So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions.
1:10 – 1:2448 turns
Thank you James. That's some list impressive Questions
Randy. I just wanted to clarify the James in the in the initial Oh, two, three, four. The fifth paragraph or the second paragraph on page 205 you start out with the initial estimates for measure C were that the city would anticipate. So as you go through the numbers I was... The city trends suggest that the city will collect about 4.2 million over fiscal year ending 21-22 correct?
And then below it, it says the city projects an additional $2.5 million. So am I reading that into 4.2 plus 2.5 coming out to revenues for Measure C closer to 7 million or is the 2. 5 part of the 4.
Yeah, it's funny. We rewrote that a few times trying to make it clear and I knew it was confusing still but so what we were trying to say and it's kind of a...I think it's a good news thing but what you're trying to say is that the city ended up collecting 4.2 million dollars over the first two years that it was adopted, that the Measure C was adopted And which is the year ending next month. So up until next month, we've collected 4.2 million total in Measure C and then we're anticipating next year collecting 2.5.
And so it's like good news bad news. The good news is that because hotels... That's strange calling a good news but when COVID impacted everything and the hotel shut down, we kind of stopped spending the money because You know when it was going to recover, but the good news is it recovered fairly quickly and so we weren't spending it. So we have kind of a pot of money sitting there which is going to fund all of this work that we wouldn't have had money for some.
Well, you know it's interesting in the past we've had quite a few people in the community say raise taxes and it just took us forever to figure it out. But this Measure C was probably one of the best things that we had done for the community. My next question is, Mayor if I can? You know every time I go into this CIP environment, I just think of capital improvement meaning something separate from everyday maintenance. So as i'm going through these line items i'm just trying to identify things that you know the multi-sports basketball futsal courts That's not a normal thing. That's above and beyond that seems to me like something intended for CIP, whereas if I look at the sewer line repair or the pergola timber repair or the gym roof repair or refurbishing of the gym floor or it seems like that's just standard maintenance operations so My question to you is, how much money do you allocate to the Public Works Department for basic maintenance on community facilities?
Is that, and if you don't, I'm not trying to put you on the spot. I'm just wondering how we go about doing that if we wanted to re-identify a CIP from standard basic maintenance that must be performed, not the way it's performed right now? And then the other thing is, it seems to me that we need to go to the Rec and Parks Department for approval And I'm lost on why we need their approval to do something as basic as refurbish a floor, which should be done on an annual basis.
You see what I'm trying to say is there's things that just need to be done and there's things that are above and beyond the call of done.
Yeah, yeah. No and that's true we went through this this year looking for those looking for the clear ones you know things like I could tell you the one that had bugged me for years was the fact that it was included in the CIP was the drafting of the community forest management plan which like we've identified as a priority but how is that a capital improvement project? And that was on the list for years So we went through it this year and we really tried to take out the obvious stuff There's some things in here to your point, you know maintaining the roof or the gym floor at Boyd Center That should have been regular maintenance The challenge is are the reason why they show up is when they aren't done regularly And now you have to replace your whole roof and it's $65,000.
It isn't regular maintenance anymore
so my thought back on that is And I think that's okay to look at it that way, but...it's a big but. If our Public Works, who's accountable for all of these public facilities, is working in conjunction with the Rec and Parks Director, for instance. And they're actually doing walk-throughs and they're identifying projects that need to be done. We shouldn't all of a sudden get caught with not knowing that our roof needs to be repaired.
Agreed. That's all I'm trying to say is so if it's a standard maintenance procedure that on an annual basis we inspect our facilities and we create work orders, which could be the services could be paid through by allocating 500 like I added up here. You've got roughly $500,000 in additional services that you're going to CIP for. So what have we allocated Public Works $500,000 additional a year in their budget that they had to do basic maintenance on facilities out of? Is that a better way? That way our hands aren't tied having to go through this allocation process versus we see it. We know it needs to get done. Let's let's get it done.
Yeah, yeah and that is what we're moving towards. I was trying to pull up, I should remember what day we took the general fund budget because the reason it doesn't show up here is because it's in the general fund but and we're bringing it back next meeting so I'll be able to...I can get into it in some detail there since the website's not pulling up but But in the budget this year, we actually had this discussion when we talked about the general fund. The maintenance budget hadn't changed for five years. It was the same dollar amount every year for five years and the reality was what we all realized was everybody just said you know kind of Here's what we normally do, and you know we're just going to keep doing what we normally do. So when we brought the budget this year we talked about this as with the city council and we talked about we need to really actually be thoughtful about our maintenance budget and increase the maintenance budgets because every cost of everything is going up, and We had included in the budget having two more maintenance workers and one of the conversations we had is if we have two more workers, we need the money to give them the tools or the equipment or the materials they need to work.
And so in the budget this year and the general fund, we actually did increase all maintenance budgets. I was trying to find it so I could say exactly how much but we increased them I want to say it was like 50% increases, with the idea being exactly what you're saying is start doing this stuff as regular maintenance and not let it get to the point where you have to do the full roof repair or you know the fold gym floor repair.
And so that is the goal. I think the problem is it comes back to the deferred maintenance, the years and years of deferred maintenance as some of this stuff does almost have to get torn down or torn out and a whole new one's gotta get put in. So that is what we're working towards. When we bring the budget back at the next meeting, I'll highlight those maintenance funds and show how much they've increased from the five years prior.
I'll wait. I have a couple other things to add when we get into the discussion.
Do you have a question?
I have four quick
questions. Okay, go.
Four quick questions and then not comments. We'll get the comments later. A lightning round. So I'll just go through them real quickly. Can the electric vehicle charge stations include some component for capital cost recovery in addition to covering energy costs?
Interesting. I think so, so typically we can recover the costs, our costs, so we should be able to build those into the cost.
I'm just saying that would help us do more charging stations. That's a question. Yeah,
we can fully recover the cost of a thing in selling the thing, so yeah, we can recover the cost through... Can I quote you on that? Fully recover the thing? Yeah, we can recover under Prop 26 and we can recover the costs. It would help us do more. Absolutely.
Which I think it's funny, James Hahn and I were talking about this recently. We're saying that four years ago we all were like well if electric vehicles catch on... No they're here. The reality is they're here so I think you're right that we have to think about that. That might be a way of
upping the ante a little bit but that's a comment let me get to the questions first.
One further thing on that before you move off the electric vehicle charging pieces of it there's three costs there that can be recovered one is the capital cost of putting in place two is the energy Three is the cost of the provider to provide that service, the credit card fees etc. And all three of those can be recovered by the city. Good okay question
two I noticed we had PEG funds for council chamber upgrades yeah can that include converting our obsolescent fluorescent to LED finally? We've
been
talking about that You and I were supposed to come up with a recommendation, we never did it. It improves the video quality for public communication?
Yeah, I believe we looked at that and our argument would be that it's the lighting for the videos so that we would argue that it could be funded
from there. And I would concur with that on the legal side. The PEG funds can be used for anything that generates and provides the video feed to the cable television system, which includes the lights for cameras. With about a 30%-40%
energy savings? Yep. Okay. Is the paving for the police department inside the security fence? It's the whole lot,
right? Both inside and outside.
That includes the non-public access area.
Yeah it includes that
as well. Okay that's my
question. And the chief and I you know we walked it two weeks ago and it's in worse shape than I
thought. I understand. That's just my question. We'll get to comments later. And then what's involved in the MS4 permit requirement 80 grand?
I believe ms4 that's for permit
requirement what's involved with that?
I believe that's the one that we are partnering with the county on if I remember
right. Is that 80,000 of taxpayer or we get some
yeah
and
I think
reimbursement on any of that
Oh, that's a good question. I'm not sure if we get reimbursed. I can find out. I think what's involved is the county is partnering with all the cities and each city contributes and then we're all doing the MS4 together because it's much cheaper. So that's the city
contribution
to the overall MS4?
That's the stormwater
permit? Yes. Okay, thank you. And I could find out the funding source. I believe we get funding specifically for those projects.
That was a speed round. Okay, let's move on to public comments. Bill
Miley?
I'm sorry, I didn't
hear you.
Good evening, Bill Miley. I have about nine quick items to say about the capital improvement program which is all good One, and this is kind of funny. In the administrative memo, and I think in the 34th paragraph it talks about the general fund projected revenue will be like 12.7 million and estimated to increase in the 2022-23 year to 134 million. There was a decimal missing, but I like that revenue. And we're going to have a tax reduction.
James, you are really good. Getting the poor roads upgraded. Wow, is that good? Item three which is especially working with the residents on downstreet and round street so that they get what they need and they don't get what they don't want like he does it shows the willingness of the city to work with And to get it done this year item four is I Don't understand under Page 7 out of 8, it says other income donations $429,500. That's really big and where do we get that from? Page 7 of 8 under revenue.
1:24 – 1:316 turns
I'll take a look at that. Yeah, that one. Okay.
Good. All right. I'll respond. Number five is... I like the capital improvement allocation for the museum's roof as separate from giving them the money so they can spend it. I like that because they do really see the museum as an institutional facility that supports the city in its foundation, okay? Item six is...I think it's important for the public to know that electric trolley vehicles are not cheap.
And that getting one for probably half a million dollars probably is a good deal. I just quickly looked it up over there, because if you it says if you convert a diesel Or natural gas, I guess. It's still going to cost you a half million dollars maybe to do that. So I think that's really important for the public to know and maybe Robin can somehow build it into a press release.
Number seven is I like charging stations, the option of putting charging stations at other parking lots. And somewhere in there was charging stations for bicycles which I certainly like and that's really good. Number eight. Let's see, number nine. Where's number nine? Okay, so oh, number eight. It doesn't seem like in cybersecurity on page four out of 18 That the three or four items there are enough. It comes up to about $32,000 and it seems to me that with all the hacking and other kinds of ransom efforts Is that enough money?
Apparently it is. Maybe we have really good cyber security now, but over the next few years we're only putting like 40 grand into that each year and I'm wondering if that's enough especially when hiring a firm that comes in and looks at what we have and tests it out to see that it works for everything new that hackers are doing. And the last thing would be This is something that's not there, but it's a capital improvement. It has to do with seating benches to provide benches, seating benches for seniors and others around town like VMU so that we can promote and support people who walk about So I'm proposing that we have a group of seniors, including me.
And you let them loose and they walk until they get tired and then you mark it and that's where the bench is. In addition to the city paying for that, you offer people the opportunity to sponsor a bench. And I'm gonna be first in the line because I want one for my wife Cookie and I would right now give you the money and... To do it. It would be wonderful to have people in this community with place where they can honor their family or whoever Because you can't put any trees in the park anymore because there's too many
of them. Thank you, Bill. Cookies bench. Thank you. Any public
comments on Zoom Gail? If there's anyone in the zoom queue who would like to speak on this item please use the raise hand function now
Can I briefly respond to a couple, just they were good points. The donation category just the question was you know the comment was that it was a large donation so there's a question about that. The bulk of that is a Civic Association donation related to the multi-sport courts this year. So to the multi-sport courts this year? Yeah, so so that you know they're always a great partner.
Cybersecurity it's it's a very good comment saying you know that the $40,000 over the next couple years isn't much in the scheme of things we were budgeting for a cybersecurity assessment and so that's to get started assessing where the weaknesses are so our What we expect is that coming out of that assessment, there's going to be certain items and needs identified that we're going to have to then bring back and budget for. So that's kind of just to wrap our hands around what we need to fix.
And then I did, going through the CIP, I forgot to mention Mr. Marley mentioned Drown Avenue and so I know that one will more likely be questions but what we had noted and I'll just briefly go through that quickly but we've talked to about a dozen people over the last couple years about Drown. Probably each council members probably talked to the same or more people in the last couple years.
And one of the challenges, to me, you know everybody can tell me if they disagree but every person I talk to has a different idea of what is needed to fix drowned. I need a speed bump or I need sidewalk or I need and you know then and the other person doesn't want what the other person wants so So the conclusion are, you know, we were thinking about it and what we ended up recommending. And we included it because right now there's drown avenues included in our paving plan which even that I've heard people say we need our street paved and other people say if you pave our street people are just going to speed more so there's right now it just doesn't feel like there's a meeting of the minds. What we recommended in this report was that over the next year, we get direction from council to have some community meetings out maybe at the park or somewhere in the neighborhood.
And we get feedback from the community and bring that feedback back on what repair consensus is of what everybody actually wants done on Drown. So the right now there's a hundred thirty thousand dollars included in paving towards drown We can include that we could get the bid But then come back and decide if that's what needs to be done or if it needs to be something else. So That was proposed. Yeah,
okay. We'll move on to discussion
1:31 – 1:369 turns
I volunteer Randy to be the Drown Avenue Neighborhood Mediator.
Actually, I was just going to touch on that, but the mayor and I have talked, Suze has talked, but it's interesting. I had one group meeting maybe a year-and-a-half ago about the bumps at my house. That was a good meeting and then the gentleman who initiated it moved out and then we ended up refunding the hump money back to the community, back to the Drown members And then there was lost in translation what we were going to do next, when we're gonna do it.
So two weeks ago I met with another group, the De Silva's and we met they actually had an engineer in the group. There are five of us meeting and one of the suggestions which I thought was very interesting is they want a walking lane, a bike lane into transportation vehicle transportation lanes And they thought maybe shutting down one side of the street for no parking to do that so So my feedback to them was because there was an engineer in the group who has access to a lot of graphics. I said, well draw us up something and then why don't you five go out and present it to your community?
And then we'll meet again and we'll discuss it. You know but it goes back to what Bill said these five have specific needs and this person has one in fact I had one person who said don't do anything because we're waiting to hear from another person so I didn't meet with anybody and then that group says why weren't you meeting with us? And I said because someone on the street said So there's a lot of confusion. I think an ad hoc committee, two council members can actually go there and focus on what that street needs and try and come to some consensus on how to do it. Like you said, some want sidewalks, some want curbs. Some don't want a hedge removed, and some don't want a fence removed. There's a lot of things going on there.
And we've created some of this confusion with some of the way we've treated the public right away. So it'll be an interesting conversation, but I agree with you. I think the best use of funding would be to actually get an engineer along with that ad hoc committee and actually study it and present it to those groups upper lower middle, and then come back to council with that.
So that's one thought and I'm glad you did that, James. Thank you. I wanted to bring this up because I heard...
Is that a different? I'm sorry. Bring it back to the chair.
I just had another comment and then I'll turn it over too.
No,
I just wanted to... Okay. You can speak on that. Susie if you want to speak on drone go ahead. It's on the tip of your hand. Can
you bring it back to the chair y'all? Do you wanna...? Yeah, yeah.
Go ahead. Before I forget, I am already forgetting what I was going to say. I if nobody else wants to be on that ad hoc committee. I would be interested and Because I'm talking to the people already I would like The mother who is afraid for her children to walk a couple of blocks, people like that. Because to me the number one thing is safety above somebody's personal preference for a hedge or fence or sidewalk whatever.
What's the word? The barometer is whether little children can walk safely to visit a neighbor and if that is accomplished then everybody else you know there's just you know that's the key thing. And can those children ride their bikes safely to Topatopa school? Those are the measurements whether it's a safe bicycle pedestrian friendly Neighborhood, that's the goal. So yes, I'd like to to be part of that My other questions can wait so go
ahead While while it came up and I think um, I think mr. Miley said is something about institutional community resources And just while he said it, I'm going to bring it up at the next council meeting. And that's taking the museum and the arts funding and actually taking it out of that public environment of making requests and create a cultural institution of the community, and I'm taking words from you Bill. I think it was you but cultural institutions our museum and our arts are here and they're gonna stay here And there's no reason that they should every year have to request funding we need to allocate a hundred thousand dollars to or whatever the council agrees to and That they bill out of that hundred thousand dollars to maintain their facilities in their operations and to provide the grants that the Arts Community does I just think that it's time that we identified them as cultural community institutions that should not have to rely on annual requests for funding.
They're here, they're ours, they're here to stay so that's just a thought on that and I'll yield the floor.
1:36 – 1:4545 turns
Where are the bike racks? We need bike racks. I mean, just go around town. Listen to Bob
Daddy!
I don't want to be snippy about it but really we need bike racks now. We don't need to wait another year. We need
them.
That's
a good point. I was thinking maybe that they're so small in amount that they don't show up on the CIP but I think we should reflect it. We'll make sure that they're reflected or included. We
need bike racks and we need more than just incidental. I mean, just look around town and have them stacked up everywhere. And we want to encourage bicycle riding so we need to encourage parking infrastructure for bike riding. So that's number one. Number two, do we have the Charlie Sage structure that we need? That's missing?
Yes.
OK. That's here. That's included in there. And I really like this sponsored bench program. Yeah. I think we should really do that. I think that's great. Couple more comments, Mayor, with your indulgence. OK. No offense, Chief. I want to talk about the police, the Sheriff's Department. This has been an issue. We don't charge anything for the use of the city facility but then we are contributing repairs And it would seem to be reasonable given the analysis that we've done on the Sheriff's Department budget, which includes an overhead component.
That we ask for credit on the billing on the overhead charges that we get from the Sheriff's Department for the money that we're putting in to cover the overhead of their facility. At least at sort of a point of discussion. Yeah. We should at least ask about it. Now, I know that we're in the midst of a campaign and so on and so forth. But I think that makes sense. There's an overhead component to the billing. We're fronting some money for overhead. Hey!
Maybe reduce the billing by the amount that we are supporting. And it's not for general public use. I think it's worthy of a discussion.
Yeah, I think it's worth discussing we have needed to do the repair for a few years so we're including it in the budget this year but I don't see why we couldn't ask I think the current agreement if I remember correctly it is like one of the dollar yearly leases right but it does currently say that the city is responsible for the exterior improvements if I recall
That's what I recall. We'll confirm if there's not a special provision regarding paving, but even
if it says that... But the point I'm trying to make is that lease is obsolete along with the contract agreement. They're both obsolete expired
and
why couldn't there be an understanding that when we're contributing overhead for the facility that they do a commensurate reduction in overhead on our billing?
Yeah, and that's where I was going is you know if the sheriff's department which is not a decision made by myself or the chief just to be clear but if the sheriff's command staff says that they're gonna follow the terms of the lease. That would be a challenge but for me I think it's worth us asking for credit on it. You know we had talked to the sheriffs about you know if we could get creative to find some win-win situations.
This is where basically we say We're happy to do it for you. If you approve, then roll
it into our paving plan. Yeah, exactly.
Anyway, just a thought. No,
that's a good point.
And the third I've already pointed out, I think we need to get these fluorescents changed. I really like the idea of a capital recovery in the charging station so we can do more of them because all of our parking lots need charging stations. The faster we can do that, the better. And then the last thing I want to ask, and Councilman Haney brought this up at a previous meeting and he alluded to it already.
Right-of-way recovery when we're doing our overlay program. What's our approach going to be when we run into an obstacle, which is a private property owner's encroachment on the public right of way that's causing a problem for our overlay program? What's our approach to that situation? I don't know what our curtain protocol is for that.
No and I don't know that we have, you know, that we have an official adopted one. I'm sure in the past it's kind of just been handled. We're
doing Cuyama and
that's going to
be
an issue.
Is that going to get in the way of the paving machines? Yeah. And what are we gonna do about it?
Yeah so that's something we can bring back. So we have to bring the bids back to council at one of the next two meetings So we can include in that conversation what that process can be, you know and let the council choose how aggressive we are
with it. It's going to only become an increasing issue because it is private use of public land, private benefit from public land.
I never really got my turn. Okay Go ahead Sousa. Okay, so James I was happy to hear you say a lot of things But I think
there's some good stuff.
Oh, yeah On item e you said electric bike charging station $10,000 and that we it would come back to as to where this is one station Yes. And it's going to come back for council direction as to where it should be located?
Yeah, and so just like my quick explanation of that the electric vehicle charging stations we have good experience with we've done a couple we know how it works We're going to come back to Council and get consensus on which parking lots we want to go next or if we want to do more in the same parking lot, you know like maybe the park-and-ride. But the electric bike charging station is not something we've done.
It's a new thing so last year the council had said let's start thinking about it so we included the money this year so it's gonna be coming up It's funny, we were talking about this. I have an electric bike and mine plugs into a normal wall outlet.
Yeah, I thought all of them did.
And so the old answer from the staff that had looked at this a year plus back was every charger is different so we can't do it. So when we talked with James Hahn and some other people who are leads on these projects We were talking about, I think it's just wall outlets near the bike trail. So that's what we're planning to propose. Okay
so that will come back because I have a lot of thoughts on that.
Yeah.
I mean there's probably some restaurant that would love to have one because nobody wants to sit for an hour well maybe some people do but if i were riding my bike from Hondura to Ojai I wouldn't want to leave it charging by itself while I go get something cold to drink you know? So I think it needs to be in some visible location
Yeah, so we can bring that back with the vehicle charging stations and we could identify the sites for each of those at
the same time. And then over the years have been so many bike parking plans. So I would like to either have some members from the Complete Streets Committee that ride their bikes for transportation and really know where they're lacking. And then we could put Bob Daddy on some kind of subcommittee or you know You know, so that it gets done in the right place. That's my suggestion
and I'm
always happy to help with
that. We had created a map of bike rack locations and we had talked about...I think what I could do is I could fold all that in together and come back and we can identify the charging stations, the vehicle, the bike charging, and then talk about where we want to put bike racks. So we can try to do that in one item.
Yeah, we could even include some more benches too. Because unlike Bill I don't think we need to take a walk. They need to go everywhere where there's space. You know wherever there's space because there's always some mother with a dog and two kids and a bag of groceries and that way they can enjoy the journey instead of always living in the future and trying to get home because we live in a beautiful wonderful town You know, there's always lots happening. So
I walk with my lunch every day and every day. Yeah, trying not to drop it on my way. So yeah, some places to stop.
Ryan, do you want to say anything?
1:45 – 1:521 turns
Thank you, Mayor. Yeah, I completely agree with Councilor Weirich about the bike racks are definitely places in town where it is under there just isn't enough. There are a lot of the round singular bike thing that I don't know if people understand what they are. But it's I've never seen those and a lot other places but I also don't ride my bike and a lot other towns so he's around here I know what they are now and I've seen them where they're jammed up. I've seen, especially the pub in the east end of Ojai in front of Topa Topa and places where people congregate a lot. There's definitely could be some relief on the weekends at Topaz has a really nice bike rack and it gets filled up all the time and it's kind of a mess. I've seen people knocking bikes over another stuff.
On the electric bikes, I'm all for as many charging stations we can get. But James the thing that is true is that they almost all exclusively plug into the wall but they don't all have the same other end and most people like I don't want to carry the adapter around it's really heavy and it's really big so when you see bike charging stations nowadays they're usually incorporating where you just walk up and you don't have your own You don't have your own charger there. So that's been the problem, I think they're getting more standardized because it's kind of becoming much more ubiquitous and there's not just a few companies here and they're all making them but we do want to see we're making sure we do the best. And Susan to your point you definitely want to public but people shouldn't expect to charge their bike without it being locked up They need to have a locking facility during the charge, so that because we will never be able to put all of them where they'll be able to be seen.
You know obviously there'll be somewhere you can look at them but if you want to go get a drink somewhere or have some water going in the shop or something, you're gonna have to lock them up. So we have to make sure they're incorporated probably with bike racks as well. But it's good to see how frequent they are and let's not forget too I was looking the other day and as many electric bikes as I see now, it's still amazing. Ohai is still probably 80-20 regular bikes because all the bikes from the inn and the other hotels and people riding around so there are still a lot of those and there's just more and more and more and it is a great way to get around town and people who say there's too much traffic well there's always a way to get around on a bike as well but I do think it wouldn't hurt Have some that are there and also to try and make sure in some organizational fashion, we're not putting them on Ohio Avenue where people will start riding their bikes more in the arcade.
We have to figure out a way to get them to the racks but not have them going through the arcade which can be problematic. I agree 100% of the lights at City Hall it you know we I can't tell you how many times when I first was on the council that I went home and had a horrible headache And after a number of hours and some of our meetings were even longer back then, it was really bothersome. So I met with Steve McCleary after one of my first meetings and brought this up to Steve, a whole bunch. And he told me that the lighting had already recently been replaced at some better version of whatever is going on. I just have no idea. I remember having that conversation So if we can do something to improve the lighting, I'm 100% for it. What people don't realize is that those lights they actually pulse fast enough that you can't see them and after a couple hours it really impedes your ability to think.
They can give you headaches there's a lot of problems. He told me they weren't that type of light but I still don't know I've always thought they were, so I don't know anymore. But it's very common in places where you're there for a long time like convention halls and other places we don't have a chance to maybe get up and leave all the time that they're changing out lighting because there's a lot of physiological effects that people are realizing on it. So as we get back into council chambers, I hope you guys don't have your brains melt from the lights there. You can see it's very dark in here.
I think the budget looks pretty good. I know what's going on. That's another one that it seems like it's focused on drown for some reason, that drown is a much worse street. And I don't know, I don't drive on it very often but when I do, I do notice it has kind of just feels tighter and it's a little more boat in the center. I think both of those things are causing people to be a little more uncomfortable.
But if we have to figure out something else creative, it sounds like that's something though that all of us are hearing enough about that it might be willing to prioritize and we have to figure out a way. Other than that, you know, I love all this bike stuff is we're redoing as you say this and I hope it's not as contentious as the Maricopa portion of the ATP. But as we move forward with the improvements on Ojai Avenue, it's probably going to be something that in concert with that and with some of the repairs you're doing is gonna be the good timing to do some of these Ojai Avenue projects and make sure that we're building infrastructure for the next 25-30 years. That's why we're laying conduit. We have $100,000 in there for broadband conduit Whether that's used for broadband or something else down the road, it's worth putting in the ground when we have a chance.
They're doing a ton of work on Ojai Avenue right now just like we put conduit in when they're doing work. I think when we are moving into the ATP on Ojai Avenue, we want to make sure that all these things are coordinated to cause the least impact and it's probably a good time when we're already tearing up a bunch of stuff to get some of these infrastructure things done. Because it's going to be tough, putting in a new bike rack, all that stuff. The electric infrastructure for electric stuff, if that's gonna be on O Avenue, it can be disruptive to some of our businesses and You know, any weekend is you only get 52 weekends a year to try and make their living. So let's try and be as workable around that schedule as we possibly can. Other than that, just really great job overall on the budget.
You guys are doing a great job. And yeah, welcome to the world of trying to get an electric truck. Only a year James, that's not bad. to a
1:52 – 2:0415 turns
We were trying to get on the list. I wasn't going to say this because this might create a whole Ford versus Chevy debate, which for guys is a big one. But we were trying to get on the Ford F-150 list. You didn't mention Dodge. That's true. Ram, yeah. Ford F-150s, they are not even taking anybody on the wait list anymore. And so we ended up to try to get our first one in, we reserved a Chevy Silverado electric. So we're kind of taking a side there.
Well, thank you Ryan. Great comments and great comments from council members. And I just want to say the themes I'm hearing lights, bikes and pavement clearly. And just a big thanks to James and staff for this is incredible list especially considering what's happened historically in the last couple of years that we are back on the ball and making things happen so applaud that. Thank you so much.
Randy then Susan.
So I had two comments that the first one was on the bill, I caught the same thing and I saw the revenue stream go from 12.7 to 134 million and I went God bless Measure C So I put my comma where it was, where it belonged and then I just wanted to make a comment on that. For years we received reports of this nature with more than just commas being the problem.
You couldn't read them you couldn't understand them you couldn't comprehend them and it wasn't because we're ignorant up here it was because they were just poorly done And I would like to thank James and his staff, commend them for being able to keep us fed with all the proper information in the right order. And especially coming out of COVID we sat in a meeting for two days last week with a bunch of water agencies and they were delegating additional work to staff when we were done And Bill and I kept turning around and going, well that's our staff.
That one guy there so it's interesting the City of Ventura you know the other couple water agencies you know they have ten times the staff that we have. And our staff just needs to know that they probably don't hear it enough from us but we appreciate and we value what they do And we value obviously you for leading them the way you do. Thank you, okay now let's get back to the nuts and bolts This I didn't when I brought this up about how to Reorganize CIP versus General maintenance that needs to be done I don't think personally you have time this year to do that and I wouldn't want you to but I would think that That somewhere in the next year, you sit down with Public Works and you sit down with Parks and James. And you actually brainstorm this and say how can we streamline this?
Make it more efficient and provide better service in a more timely manner to our community. Yeah. And that's what I would ask. Don't...I don't expect any changes from what you presented just let's think about that down the road.
Thank you and then I did, I was able to get the page to load. And so I had given an estimate and what it is for the last five years we had been basically budgeting 250 grand a year for maintenance. And this year we had increased it after it was the same number for five years we increased it to about $410,000. Not everything all at once, but a big increase with that in mind and that focus of starting to do more as routine maintenance and not having to do the complete remodel and tear out and all that kind of stuff.
I also think with the flexibility of Measure C that you don't necessarily have to throw a specific amount of money into a pot. What you have as a city manager to do on a consent basis is, as you see something, do it because there's a tremendous amount of trust in you and staff right now and I would say run with it.
Thank you.
So the City Council received another email. This one from a resident named Mia Emhart, Ojai resident for almost 50 years she put in her letter and this is another person who was almost hit in the crosswalk. This was again in front of Ojai Coffee Roasting Company and she had looked and didn't see any cars coming as she crossed but she thinks he came peeling out South Montgomery, so my question is this One of our problems. Is that Ojai Avenue is really it's also a state highway run by Caltrans and the public needs to you know understand what that means Can we do someone suggested?
That we need raised crosswalks that act as speed bumps for With lights in the road, such as they have in Santa Paula. Now I don't know if Santa Paula has raised crosswalks. I heard about the lights and Santa Paula, but can we have raised crosswalks on Ojai Avenue? that act as speed bumps? Is that something that's allowed or can you investigate, you don't have to answer.
Yeah we could look into it. We could look into the two things that Caltrans has been supportive of and to your point it's Caltrans Street at this point and so Caltrans has supported the rapid rectangular, rectangular rapid flashing beacons RFBs I don't remember which R is which order but The RRFBs, which are the square flashing lights that do give some kind of bump as you... It's not intended to be a speed bump but there's some texture to it when you go over it. And so they support the RFBs and they support the crosswalks and then the other thing that they have supported which we've been careful with was curb extensions. They promote curb extensions for everything are for most of those crosswalks. So, those are the three in our multiple conversations with Caltrans because we've talked to them both as part of the ATP but on other projects as well about doing safety improvements on Ojai Avenue Those are the three that they typically use.
So I don't, I haven't heard of this other option so we'd have to look into that.
Could you ask them because we as a council decided against having all those initially proposed curb extensions? Right, right. But the idea of a raised crosswalk, I'm sure there's pros and cons but in many ways it's appealing and it's better than a death in the crosswalk or another accident in the crosswalk Yeah, I think it's worth looking
into. So far when we're working with them we keep pushing towards the rapid flashing beacons but we'll look into these with them as well
It doesn't mean we have to do it, but I'd like to know if it's an option because things are getting busier and they're you know. And if we can prevent these are like whether the canaries in the coal mines right now these type of encounters and there is no question people have passed me up north signal which is unheard of You know, and on Grand Avenue even when people are stopped in the crosswalk some impatient driver... I've seen it. It happened even when they were... The police were there leading the bike trade and they caught him!
The kids were trying to cross so this was a couple of years ago but you know we have to face Some more impatient, you know Ojai needs to be marketed as a slow town And that is a draw should be a draw and that we can we need to create the expectation That when you are here most especially on residential streets and creek Including Creek Road all of these streets slow down. Enjoy the scenery You know Thank you.
You know what we do is put boxes of pixie out and when we see a speeder come in by just throw it at him So we have a parking committee that's in place And so we heard a lot of suggestions tonight about parking I just would When I think of bike parking, I Think of how we want people How we want folks who ride bikes to walk downtown, not ride downtown because of the narrowness of our streets and the narrowness of our sidewalks.
So maybe some joint ventures while the parking committee is thinking and thinking a Westridge on west end and Westridge on east end because they have parking areas that we might be able to actually appropriate or negotiate some stalls But again, if we place them in specific areas where people feel comfortable and safe leaving their bikes. And then we're going to improve or enhance the foot traffic ability in the downtown corridor hopefully with the ATP that excites me now.
Park benches, my only concern about more benches and I like them too. The problem is they encourage people to sleep and to use them for not necessarily the purpose they're intended for. And then the other part of it is the maintenance of them. So I just, I'm not against them. I'm just let's think this through so that we don't create an environment where we wish we hadn't.
That's all. And I thought the parking committee could do that mayor.
Yeah, okay. Susan? As to the maintenance, I already suggested to our wonderful city manager look at the equipment in on the Creek Road Park. My mind is blank. What's it called? The park on Creek Road. Camp Comfort. They have these indestructible, they appear to be practically as close to indestructible as possible and low maintenance. They're metal with little holes in them and if we have people sleeping on these benches that means we have another problem that we need to address so there's no reason wait wait wait it's my turn okay Okay, so that's one thing. But to your point about walking our bike through town? That's not going to happen. I can tell you that when I'm going from the post office to Westford Market, I'm not gonna walk my bike all that way and park it somewhere.
I need to put my groceries in my bike cart. I'm going to go down Ojai Avenue, and if there's no room because there's cars, I'm just going to get in the traffic lane. That's for me. I realize families with little kids can't do that. So that's a whole other topic. And sometimes it is practical to ride our bikes, to walk our bike, but it's not always practical.
I think we're about ready to wrap it up. Can you wrap it up?
Well, more importantly is that it's not a discussion about right or wrong. It's just a discussion about where to end and my thoughts are when we're doing Parking bike parking lots. I'm thinking more of the weekend warrior not the daily warrior So I recognize that there are people in this community that ride their bikes daily. And again, I'm not against that as long as they obey.
2:04 – 2:209 turns
Okay, so thank you all for a fruitful and interesting discussion And thank you once again to James and staff for doing all this amazing work and getting us back and on Back on track. So let's take a five-minute break and we will come back with our last item You
were doing so well tonight
The bike thing is just crazy.
Yeah, it could be a concentrate.
We're back. Okay,
let's move on to item number five a discussion of voting districts and ranked choice voting
And thank you Madam Mayor, Mayor and Council. I'll give a brief staff report and then questions public comment and council comments. No hard action to be taken tonight if there is support to do something we'd have to come back at a future meeting. So brief overview of what we're looking at the city's current electoral system first then ranked choice voting then options in litigation update so the city's current electoral system was adopted In 2018, to avoid and take advantage of a safe harbor provision under the California Voting Rights Act lawsuit. That's why we as we all know perhaps all too well the district-based system instead of the prior at large system.
The city adopted that in order to avoid what the liability that had extended to the level of millions and millions of dollars for most of the cities that had sought to fight. We took a look at it and we switched to districts It was implemented for the 2020 election with the first election Councilman Francina from District 4 and the Mayor continues to be elected at large every two years. The other three seats will be elected this coming election November 22, their first district elections districts 1 2 & 3 and it continues successively the mayor at large every two years as originally approved by the voters and re-approved in 18 and then the four council seats split one, two, three, one cycle and four the other cycle.
And everyone's elected by plurality which means whoever gets the most votes wins for each of the five seats. Ranked choice voting is a different voting system by which the voters rank their candidates for each office in their order of preference and the ballots are counted in rounds. So if you imagine a case where you had three candidates for one seat, the voter would mark A1B23C or C first B second A third And then you count up everyone's first choice preferences, and then you take the lowest candidate and say okay A got 35%, B got 40% and C got the balance 25%. C got the least votes. So you take every ballot for whom the first choice was C, and you go to their second choice. And you distribute their ballot out to in this case A and And you go in successive rounds, each time dropping the lowest number of votes candidate until somebody gets to a plurality.
If it's a single member seat or if you have multiple member seats as another option until the relevant threshold has been met which is often 50% of the number of votes for that seat so if you had 1,000 voters and two seats. Each voter would get two votes so it would have to be a thousand votes for each seat and the numbers are adjusted to reflect each situation but the key about it is voters can express multi-layered preferences on one ballot. So they mark I want A B C I want C B A etc and then those preferences get expressed through the successive rounds of voting The process is done publicly. In each individual voter's vote always remains confidential, we have secret ballots in this country no one will know how anyone voted but the math to do those rounds is all public so everyone will understand and can if there are issues can contest it.
has been implemented in California, in seven charter cities. Oakland, Berkeley, San Francisco, San Leandro, Albany, Eureka and Palm Desert. And it has been implemented nationwide in a number of cities mostly larger cities And in a couple of states, the one that I'm most familiar with is the state of Maine. They have implemented ranked choice voting for their state elections and federal for the Congress and Senate but not the president. President, of course, is a different election system.
And I don't believe any other states have yet adopted ranked choice voting although I know a number are looking at it. I think it's on the ballot in Nevada this year and some others are in process. Back to cities in California, only charter cities have an express statutory right to move to a ranked choice voting system. General law cities under Elections Code Section 15450 are required to use a plurality vote system and no general law city to my knowledge has attempted or to shift to a ranked choice voting system. No court has thus ruled that a general law city does not have the power to shift to a ranked choice voting system. However, a general law city that wanted to do so would need to get a court to validate that the voter approval perhaps of a ranked choice voting system could override the default state law.
The argument would be that the General Law City's provision in the State Constitution Article 11 Section 7 Which provides the general law cities have the power to make all laws necessary for the general public's welfare and benefit. And are subject, and have that power except as to any conflict with general law that the constitutional power through the voters to adopt a voting system should override the state statutory system. That argument is extant.
It has a limited chance of success given the existing case law looking at other election situations. General law cities are generally held to follow state elections code, charter cities have constitutional power through the voter approved charter to shift to different election systems. There was a bill that was put forward in 2019 SB 212 which was adopted by the legislature To allow general law cities to shift to a ranked choice voting system, it however was vetoed by Governor Newsom and that is not definitive but also further indication that the existing statutory system does not allow general law cities to switch to ranked choice voting else a new law would not have had to have been passed. Although because it was vetoed it's not definitive proof so it's a bit of an open question or a case of first impression there's also no case law that has assessed the question of whether a ranked choice voting system can, if implemented with, as in this example or this city, four district seats all elected ranked choice voting at large.
Would that override or survive against a challenge from the California Voting Rights Act? The argument is there because the voters' ability to express multi-layered preferences is baked into a ranked choice voting system but no one has tested that. The cities, the general law cities that all have ranked choice voting As I understand it, also all have districts and have long had them. So, and I'll confirm that to make sure I'm right on that but my understanding is, I know for example Berkeley, Oakland, San Francisco, San Leandro the larger ones already had districts anyway and they've had districts for a significant number of years.
So there too is an open question. Open question number one can a general law city do it? Open question number two if so does that outweigh or override a Voting Rights Act challenge And then last is an update on the Santa Monica case, which we've all been waiting for. In 2020 City of Santa Monica got a useful decision from the Court of Appeal that knocked out a trial court victory for the Pico Neighborhood Association contending that Santa Monica's at-large election system violated the California Voting Rights Act. The Court of Appeal threw that out and said no because in part it is impossible to draw or the plaintiffs had not shown that you can draw a majority-minority district or even a district in which the plaintiffs would be able to achieve a likelihood of success for their racial category could not be drawn in Santa Monica.
There was, they had failed the test and threw out the Voting Rights Act challenge. The Supreme Court granted permission to review that case in October 2020 And in the course of so doing, de-published the Court of Appeals decision. So it was issued but is not in effect. But has not yet heard oral arguments and they are accepting late amicus briefs as recently as a couple weeks ago.
I have no crystal ball. But reading between the available evidence, I do have – I do not expect a decision by the Supreme Court in time to affect the November 2022 elections. It seems fairly clear that the court is taking their time in order to give themselves time to think about it and pushing their decision until after anything could be changed for this upcoming election.
We are monitoring the case closely and will report if – if and when they issue a decision. There is no deadline for the Supreme Court to act. They have absolute control over that The legislature could of course do something and they're not going to, given existing politics in Sacramento. So we wait for the court on that front. So with that I'll take any questions and then of course public comment too.
Thank you Matt.
Mayor thank you. Given that I think there is some research and support of rank choice voting with no districts in a small city arguably serving the goals of the California Voting Rights Act, the same or better than districting would. At its core part of the finding of the Santa Monica case for small cities. What would be your advice in terms of our considering moving forward with a referendum at the next available election to see if the voters wanted to do this, and would that buttress our legal position if the voters so chose?
And then the last part of that in terms of let's say the Supreme Court finally decided something or we decided to go ahead and try it because under the argument that this serves the end of the voting rights law. The goal of the voting I saw, and we have referendum support for that question. Does that buttress the legal position? And then what would it cost for us to put a referendum on the ballot?
2:20 – 2:2523 turns
I'll answer the last one. On a regular cycle, not a special election. Yeah on the regular cycle that one's easiest it's usually about what is it $30,000 at the typical price we get quoted from the county to add an initiative question to an existing ballot and then on the other questions I do think it would budge us the position voter approval lets us tap into the general power of the voters under the state constitution to make decisions regarding their own communities that gives us a better position Then simply a council decision I agree with that is noted though. We still have to overcome this this provision in the elections code if that were to be the goal and There is time Two, still put something on the ballot for November and one option would be to put it on the ballot recognizing that there's an inherent cost in that.
See if the voters approve it. If they don't so be it. If they do also so be it then assess and make it an option and then assess whether to implement it because between November 22 and 24 there's time to see what the Supreme Court does everyone expects them to issue a ruling well Well before 24, so sometime early next year. Then we get a ruling and it's sort of between the ruling and having voter authorization assess it but recognize that we would still likely draw a challenge because we'd be to my knowledge the first general law city to try ranked choice voting by voter approval.
So we might become a test case and then it's a matter- Because
it might
trigger a lot of amicus
briefs in support.
Oh certainly it's I'm
not saying we're guaranteed to lose. I'm saying we are and quick question one more promise what's the deadline for our making this decision for the November ballot? The deadline to put something on the
November ballot is August 12th okay thank you
any other questions from council Susan
This is extremely interesting. So, okay allow me to just comment I am confident that the public prefers to vote for every council rather than one representative. I'm 100% confident so if we could put that on a referendum can we remove districting?
That would be the yeah
That would be the point. So, the question is could if we put shifting back to at large on the ballot? We could do so. The cities that have tried that have mostly not been successful when the Voting Rights Act challenges arrives with one or two exceptions. I
don't mean that it just shows what the voters want. It doesn't guarantee what the result of that would be but So you're saying that by the referendum for rank choice voting, would that automatically... Okay. How would that affect a council member's ability if they had to move?
So if the voters approved an authorization to switch to ranked choice voting and go back to at-large with ranked choice voting, that would take effect with the next election. So everyone would, all current council members would remain elected. Well the three that are elected at large and the one that's elected by district and then in November thereafter. Everyone is elected under regime remains elected under a regime so nothing changes unfortunately until you're reelected at large if that makes sense?
Yes, yes it makes sense.
But it also means that those who are elected by district or everyone's remains the same rules under which they're elected for the full term nothing can change during your term would be a better way to phrase it right
okay and the only way to do this is there's no way to do it you know like a petition it has to be a referendum like if we gathered you know 7 000 signatures could we do it this time
Those are legally the same thing. In other words, the council can put it on the ballot or the voters could put it on the ballot. Either way it could be put on the ballot through the proper initiative process with their appropriate steps. So if the voters could put it on the ballot so too the council can put it
Yes, I guess i was thinking hoping that if we had enough support we could just initiate it ourselves. Any other with this coming election?
I'm not sure I'm quite tracking your question is there time to get it on the next election yes there is on the November 22 election is is there a way to do it without being on the ballot no
Oh, I see because the ballots are pre-printed and we can't just have our own. Yeah.
Yeah, exactly. So that's that August 12th deadline if the council wanted to put on the ballot there is still time between now and August 12th although the window is closing.
Thank you.
All right. Any more questions? Randy.
2:25 – 2:3012 turns
So, you said questions. I thought we were already in discussion.
No, we
haven't taken public
comment.
Do you have a question? You know, well so let's go back to what Sousa was saying or let's just go back to the referendum in general. We can steal Appeal down the road the way this body is elected if the city of Santa Monica prevails in there In their court and you know in their lawsuit Correct. Yes necessarily have to go to this what's it called CVR ranked choice voting?
No, the depending on what the state Supreme Court does whether they find for Santa Monica or the plaintiffs and Depending on how if they if they find for Santa Monica how they rule about the law generally, that does create the opportunity if it's useful to declare we're under that umbrella and switch back. So
versus paying for the referendum and gathering signatures, we could sit this out and wait for that ruling to take place and then make a decision, the next council can make that decision as to what they can or cannot do correct? Yes, that's also an option And then I have comments when we get to the
discussion. Do you have a question? Yeah, just to clarify one point there. I don't believe we have to gather signatures to put a referendum on the ballot that could be done by council action.
Correct. The council alone can put something in the ballot.
Okay any public comment on... We have one Jeffrey Starkweather.
Will add you. Thank you thank you I do have a question for Matt, but you can answer it after I'm done. It just occurred to me if the voters put it on the ballot as opposed to City Council number one would that strengthen the case and that would make less easy to sue the city since the voters did it rather than the City Council? So that's just a question. The second one would be if the voters put it on who pays for the election and those are just questions.
But anyway, I would think that would strengthen the argument if the voters put it on the referendum. Number one, I think we need to get back to citywide elections. If you look at the numbers here and you look at the case, our case is so much more overwhelmingly legally than Santa Monica. They had 30% in districts. Our highest is 13.2% in any district of the minority population, and the other thing I found interesting reading the appeals court case was that they were mentioning what the district court said and the district's court made a ...
I guess it would be not binding but they made a factual assertion that rank choice voting systems as alternative to district voting would, quote, enhance Latino voting power. One court, the court that actually ruled against them said that this would be a choice so it seems to me It's always good to get the voters opinion on something like this, rather than the council just changing. So I would strongly favor putting it on the ballot both changing at large.
Anyone who has ever run elections knows when you're doing a large election it's a lot easier to get a minority elected because you can concentrate your vote on that person than it is single districts, particularly when you don't have the numbers. And also I think adding the rank choice voting and putting those together would strengthen our case. So I don't know that we need to implement it like Matt said. We could vote it in and wait to see when the Supreme Court case, or we could go forward to see if anyone sues us. But you know, we don't have to actually implement it. I don't know if they could sue you before you implement it.
And so I think it would be a worthwhile thing to get a voice of the community that they would like to have, be able to vote for each council member and be able to hold each council member accountable for what they do as opposed to being only like 1500 voters You know, voting in people because there's no issues that just were very few that just represent these small little districts in our city.
Everything affects everybody in the city so I'm strongly in favor of putting this on a ballot. Thank you.
Thank you Jeffrey Bill Miley.
2:30 – 2:3611 turns
Good evening Bill Miley So, I know how this works and I also know that only chartered cities in California, chartered law cities have so far adopted it. So it seems to me that the question is kind of rhetorical. Now, in past elections we have had probably at the most three candidates for any one positions except when we were citywide In the future, if the state law or court decisions allow general law cities this option and we routinely have more than two candidates for a position, I'm in favor of adopting it.
If we don't have more than two, we don't need it. Even though we've gone now to districts and probably will stay there for a while, it seems to me that we don't have more than two candidates for an elected position. So we probably don't need it. My reasons for adopting at some time if approved would be it allows multiple choice selections rather than yes or no Especially when there are several credible candidates. But on the other hand, you can always just vote for one and not do the rank choice.
It obviously supports credible candidates or it heavily supports those candidates who are considered credible to increase their odds of being elected and contributing hopefully to the public benefit And it promotes a decision right away rather than a runoff. So I'm not sure we should do anything right now and just to give you an example, There's no commentary in public comments on emails about that. Nobody in the TV audience or the community has said anything about this other than Jeffrey and me, so apparently there's no interest, or there's no understanding, or they don't even know about it.
Thanks.
Thank you Bill. Any comments on Zoom Gail?
If there's anyone in the Zoom queue who would like to speak on this item, if you would please use the raise hand function now.
Okay let's move on to discussion. Susan go ahead.
Well my first thought is that I'm strongly in favor of this because we're a small town. Very difficult to find people willing to step up And this has actually done the opposite, the districting has done the opposite of what the voter rights or whatever it's called, voting rights was intended for. If the public understood this, I believe that they would be in favor of it because right now just to clarify what I'm trying to say. Say there's three qualified candidates but they all live in one or two districts and there is a third district and nobody has stepped up like we have A situation now where there's no one living in one of the districts and we have probably someone will step up. But I remember clearly back in the 1990s for at least that decade, it was not unusual when there were empty seats to have up to seven candidates running for those two seats.
And it was very lively and people wanted to run. There's other reasons why people might not be running that I wanna discuss at another meeting. But, I think the benefits of our small town having red choice voting, what's in there? The benefits are greater than possible problems ahead. Yeah. I mean the problems wouldn't come from within the community if And perhaps I'm not fully understanding what risks we're taking, but there's no risk in having the referendum on the ballot. There's no risk in that is there?
I'm not sure I would say no risk because we'd be the first to try it. Someone might try to pull it off the ballot contending we don't have the right to do so. Courts recently especially in Ventura County tend to not look kindly on challenges that stand in the way between the ballot box and the voters The court's likely, if that challenge was filed to say no no come back after the voters do or do not approve it.
But there is a risk and there are cases recently in other matters where folks have filed to stop something from even going to the voters so I can't say that there's no risk.
Could i ask a question about that? Are you saying that the risk would come from within Ventura County or from the state or
both? All of the above in other words any person around the state could file the suit Contending that the voters have no right to vote in a general sitting rank choice voting
somebody has to be first
correct
Ryan
2:36 – 2:435 turns
Thank you. Yeah, we had the same issue with the Measure V election against Golden State Water. There was a lawsuit filed to invalidate us even getting it on the ballot. So the first hearing we had to win was saying that they weren't going to do it and the judge in that decided they were not going to stop or decide the legality of what we were trying to do prior to the election. But that is, it's a little bit different circumstance though. And I'll leave that to Matt because it's not exactly the same thing but it was a challenge preemptory challenge before you got to the election. They let the election move forward and then it postponed the implementation of what had passed until the court case got settled. So it is a possibility and the reality is that if it's challenged then we are gonna be in a position of either folding or spending probably a significant amount of money to defend And that's the risk if it gets challenged, if we wanna move forward with it.
Even if we just wanna preserve the invalidation action which is usually what it falls under a written mandate that we have to fight that and then we'd have to fight it afterward as well only if it passed. And then there's probably not gonna be any clarity on that coming out of the legislature anytime soon, not that I've heard of or anybody else I believe is aware of. So we would be running a risk of being stuck in a litigation defending what the public voted for if they vote for it.
May I ask Ryan a question? Ryan, what did you mean that rather than fighting it, we could just... I wouldn't wanna spend a lot of money fighting this or any money but did you say we could just fold it
Well, if they were to challenge it we could say that we give up the case and then it would be invalidated as an action that we took that wasn't proper as a council. And that's what the lawsuit at Golden State filed said that what Casitas did in passing putting on the ballot and passing a motion to put on ballot of tax measure to Melrose property tax They said was an improper use of the Mellow Roos tax. So they were saying it was invalidated and had a litany of reasons. The judge said, look we're gonna let the election go out. We're not gonna cloud the election. Let's see what the electorate wants to do and then we'll come back. But the amount of work it took during that now I did it all for free but you know, I don't know like the seat is spent but it was probably in the neighborhood at 25 to $50,000 and then it got appealed.
On top of that, to the Court of Appeals. And then we were stuck in the Court of Appeals for a while and then we were waiting to see if the Supreme Court would bring it up. They denied it and that was when it was finally allowed that they could start the eminent domain action using the Mellow Roost money. So that initial litigation to defend the right to move forward was not inexpensive and that of course was Golden State with essentially bottomless pockets going after it. We don't know who the opponent would be, but if the state wanted to jump in or some other group and we'd have to anticipate that if they were going to litigate it, it wouldn't be expensive.
Randy?
So following up just on that comment, it seems to be in this report that the Governor Newsom is not for this. So I would imagine that might be one body that might want to contest this. This is my take and I'm going to try and be considerate how I say it but we got led into some nonsense when we went to an elected mayor This city was functioning well by itself.
Elections were good, people that ran were elected and then somehow some way we got led into let's get an elected mayor because that's better for us. And I'm going to be honest with you it hasn't been. It cost that first mayor $10,000 to run. It costs this mayor $20,000 to run. It's never cost anyone anywhere near that amount of money to run for an office in this community and then it also had people hire handlers or hire people to manage their thing. Bill Miley was my whatever you want to call it, my handler.
Before that it was, I'm just saying it didn't cost anything. And we didn't have a community that was divided and we didn't have people looking for divisive things to pit council people about when we all want what's best for this community and we probably agree on 99%. So here we are again trying to play with something Which I just don't see the benefit in. Now, I haven't had to run in a district contest yet. You know what? So be it.
My attitude on running for council in this community is if I'm doing well and I represent the community well and the community will reward me with another vote of confidence. And if the community doesn't, it doesn't. And that's just the way it goes, no matter what system. But to start playing with more hocus pocus and more stuff that... First of all I don't even know how you could communicate how to vote on this. Look what happened with the mayor! All of a sudden we elect the mayor and everyone thinks the mayor is the Mayor of Ojai and that he or she has more status and more Gravidas, then the rest of us elected officials. The reality is the mayor gets to put something on the agenda without a second. That's all the mayor gets.
That's it and he or she performs the function of the mayor that used to be done on a rotational basis So that's all I'm trying to say here is, I don't know why we're even contemplating this much less trying to educate the community on it. When you can see by the questions were asking tonight none of us know anything about it so you obviously know where I stand if it's not broken don't fix it and we should have never done the mayor.
2:43 – 2:5845 turns
I'm not ready to take a position on this, but I do want to take a couple points at issue with what was stated. I think we do have something broken in the fact that the votes to elect a council member have shrunk considerably. And that frankly tends to have its own biases by, and it's listed the Supreme, the Court of Appeals case went into that exhaustively and those points are even stronger the smaller the city we get.
I think there is a sense Did the costs of districting go up? The dysfunctional aspects of districting go up, the smaller the city you are. I think that's fairly clear. I'm not ready to take a position on whether it's worth $30,000 to put it on the ballot. I just not. I am not ready to make that decision tonight. I want to commend the City Attorney for an excellent review for me to think about, for all of us to think about and talk to our constituents And see if there is support for this, because it does cost $30,000.
But I would take issue with the idea that nothing's broken now. I think the small city districting has some profound dysfunctional aspects to it.
I would agree with that bill and we just don't have enough people really On my concern is is this going to create any? Work for staff, you know, it's a good idea. It's bad timing just because we can't give staff They're already overworked and already involved in the litigation so I would really be opposed to Giving James and staff more work at this point. It just it's inhumane So I think we just need to keep that in perspective too Randy,
I just want to clarify this. We've had one round of voting for Suze's seat in a district there was no chaos no confusion nothing now granted it was done let me finish let me finish it was done during COVID under different circumstances but the rest of us have not had to do that so before we can say it doesn't work I'm saying we've got a system, work within it. Now if you didn't like the outcome of your election say so.
Okay that's what I'm saying. So obviously it did well for you but all
I'm trying to say is
Again, we experimented and it's just not my opinion. There's a lot of people that dislike the dysfunction of this mayor seat in this community and it's not the person, it's the seat so it's important to clarify that. And you guys want to spend $30,000 or you want to have another conversation? You have it but you guys see where I'm at on this.
Susan? Go for it.
Okay, let me gather my thoughts again. First of all just two small but important corrections the amount of money that you quoted for the mayor's seat is the same for a City Council seat I don't see well I'm sorry but go look at my record you can go look at mine
you can look at my records
yeah to the I don' think there's a difference As far as running a campaign, it's the same whether you're a city council member or the mayor. And from my experience, it was very difficult being limited to us. So you also said the community is electing you. It's not true your district of maybe I think I ended up Getting maybe, what was it? 700 votes. The difference was very small. 35.
35
votes.
That's what
you won by.
35 votes. Yeah
I think it's like 700 voters
per district yeah and I forget the cost of my campaign but I spent half my campaign funds I swear we're spent trying to explain to people what district four voting meant. I took out full page ads explaining that even though, the whole scenario that even though you're voting only the people in a limited district can vote those people are actually voting for the other people because those people can't vote for you. The other people can't vote for you does that make sense?
Explain that I had points and it was it was my hardest. It was a far more challenging campaign Than running at large, so it'll be interesting to see how it goes for you now It could be that my district was particularly different because this is very spread out all your
signings were above ground
No crosstalk please councilor can we bring it back to the chair? Thank you
But my thinking is that this conversation about the mayors, it's really to me different from what we're... I think it's good that we had the discussion. I completely agree with the comments made about spending the money staff time taking risks. I don't wanna do that. I think it's still important that we're discussing it. There was a point I wanted to make. I'll just say that I... Oh!
We did bring up the mayor, didn't we have a vote on whether to continue? And we could do that again at any point right?
Yeah the voters reaffirmed the elected mayor process in 2018. Yeah and
we could bring it up I mean I won't but somebody if somebody wants to bring it up again we can put that back on the ballot correct
yeah.
Yeah, I would just like to say this is a receive report. I think it's time just that we received the report and read and understand it and talk to constituents.
Okay, agreed. Well thank you staff for all your work on this. No,
he
already spoke.
And just to clarify, I believe it was 2016 when the voters reaffirmed the elected mayor. I was wrong in 18 but the voters did recently reaffirm it and they could always adjust it.
Matt, wasn't it? It was on the ballot for the directly elected and then it was another about two to four years. I think we had another, it was on the ballot twice but I think it, I don't know if both were, but I know that year because the first one was do you want it? And then two or four years and they said yes in two. And then I think went back again for two or four and it was reaffirmed at two.
Correct
that's
correct yeah before my time so don't blame me all right any other let's uh let's move on uh council member reports go ahead bill
yes first of all i want to commend Our research citizen activist that's still in the audience, Mr. Starkweather who is putting me to shame with his thorough research and he is almost singly responsible for the county recognizing that level of service is not the way to handle projects. It encourages sprawl, discourages affordable housing and generally inhibits the repurposing of blighted buildings and we I believe recently got notice from the county that they are officially directing the switch from LOS to VMT and I think our citizen activists should take Number two, as mentioned by the city manager, the school board is welcoming A ideas for revenue offset through programming of a proposed community pool and different design aspects and how that might affect revenue.
And I just, I think I really appreciate the way that we under city manager's leadership. And I assume with the mayor's concurrence that we are moving to the park and rec commission Look at this, that's the way we do things openly and transparently and I look forward to the deliberation. And finally yeah the mediation uh that Mr. Haney, Councilperson Haney mentioned all we can say about it was positive experience it seems like it's going in a positive direction but we did have a little chuckle when the mediator at one point says well just have your city's PIO handle communication this and we're kind of like Well, we have another hat for the city manager now. Our PIO who kind of know we don't have that kind of staff support so it was kind of interesting but we definitely I think accorded our the city in general I think accorded itself well in that mediation.
One of many.
Okay any other council member
reports?
We're on
yeah
reports a City Manager's report
Yes, I have two quick things. One are events and public information coordinator Robin Godfrey. So we actually do have one now as we were talking about how at the end of each meeting I list a bunch of events and try to remember all the dates. And so she was kind enough to put together a slide that will be bringing for each meeting So for our quiet sleepy town, these are the events in the next couple of weeks. And these are just you know kind of the events coordinated through the city so there's plenty more but we have Thursday May 26th 10 a.m at Libby Fountain. We're gonna have the coffee with Chief Rivera and myself and so that's open for anybody who wants to come and talk public safety or anything else in this city.
So we'll have that this week Saturday and Sunday, May 27th to 29th at Libbey Park. We have art in the park coming back and returning to the park which is exciting. Monday, May 30th at noon at The Bowl we'll have the Memorial Day Patriotic Concert. Saturday June 4th coming through Ojai as the Ojai Valley Century Ride through the bike trail. Sunday June 5th coming through Ojai the Mountains To The Beach Marathon That will have some impact on Ojai Avenue that we're coordinating with our public works and our police department. And then the big one, the return of the Ojai Music Festival during its more regular hours I think last year they had a modified schedule so That will be Thursday, June 9th through Sunday, June 12th. So those are the events in the next couple weeks and then like we mentioned we have a rec commission where they'll talk about the pool and we have planning commission meeting where we're planning to bring the development agreement for the affordable housing projects scattered throughout town.
And so a lot of activities over the next couple weeks and all that information can also be found on our webpage. So, we wanted to show that and then as far as the next council meeting. We do have several items for the next regular council meeting. We have our public hearings for the assessment districts for the library contract which those are annual items.
Budget workshop. And then we're working, we're planning to bring the remainder of the arts appointments and potentially some other commissioner appointments. And then we'll have a presentation recognizing our celebrating Pride Month so we'll have that as well. And then last is we are scheduling a special council meeting to go to update the Council on the next step for the ATP right-of-way acquisition this Thursday at 530 I believe was the time we finalized so that is another meeting. So those are the events over the next couple weeks
Thank you, James. A lot happening and thanks to Robin for making such a nice list.
Thank you.
Okay future agenda items. I didn't
get to do my report.
Oh okay, I'm
sorry go ahead. Well first I want to thank Chief Jose Rivera for his participation and his deputies and the DOG at the annual Park and Rec Open House. And I couldn't attend, there was a family wedding and other events but I saw the photographs on Facebook so wonderful and the videos and you know, it's exactly the kind of outreach that I like to see with the communities. So thank you so much for spending the day there. It was wonderful.
And then I wanted to make the council aware, you probably are aware that there is a big There was controversy happening over the Camp Vermont expansion. I listened to the recording and I'll forward you an email that I got, I won't read it all from one of the residents. Some of these emails were just addressed to me so I don't know if you received them. So I'll forward them tonight. And tomorrow's actually the last day to comment I know that I drive that area, I share the concerns. So I'm gonna be sending in a public comment as an individual council member. They're looking for city support.
is what they're looking for. And I hope the MAC meetings become video recorded because you can't see, of course, the slides but just to listen to that public, to the recording reminded me how important because we can't always go there on Monday night but to listen to the recording seems Super important so and thank you to those that were there in person. Thank you Tomorrow night, I was hoping that we had the ATP meetings. I wouldn't have to go. I don't know yet.
Good try. I'll talk to you And I would just like to reiterate what Susan said. It was such a great event on Saturday at the Parks and Rec, so thanks to Louise and the staff because it was really fun. Yeah, the
2:58 – 2:595 turns
rec team pulled that
together. And Sam the dog was a huge help. And I learned that Blatz in German means lie down. You must know that, right? Because the police officer kept saying, Blatz! Blatz! Oh, I didn't know that. Yeah, it's true. Who knew? Okay, future agenda items.
Real quick, Mayor. My grandchildren love that too and we have pictures of them in the off-road vehicle. So we did soccer at eight and I'm sitting there watching the grounds going well it's nine something it's ten something when are they setting up here so yeah you guys pulled it together real
quick.
No future agenda items? Okay, well thank you all for a peaceful and productive meeting. And happy birthday to Sousa! We're adjourned.