BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 11, 2023

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:0913 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:00

Good evening. Call to order, we have a quorum may we have the roll call please Weston?

Roll call — called by Rachel Lang
Show transcript
Yes Mayor. Mayor Stix? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Here. Council Member Ruhl? Here Council Member Lange? Here Council Member Whitman? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:15

Thank You Weston and welcome everyone to the April 11th 2023 meeting of the Ojai City Council James will you please lead us in the pledge

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction0:22

Yes, thank you. Thank you. Please join me in standing right hand over your heart ready begin.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:34

the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:45

Thank you James and approval of the agenda motion to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed0:48

I'll move to approve.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:50

Second?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.840:51

I'll second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:52

Okay, all in favor say aye. Aye. Okay great and no presentations correct James? Correct. And no

commission reports?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:01

Do not believe there are any correct yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:04

We will move on to public communication. And just a reminder to everyone, these are items that are not on the agenda and because they're not on the agenda we cannot discuss them but we can agendize them for future reference. Each comment is three minutes. You'll hear a gentle chime at the end so please respect that. No giving away time. So thank you very much for being here and we will begin with Community first, we have Valerie City of Ojai speaker card event organizations cards special color so first We have Valerie Freeman and then wonderful Ron from the library Thank You

CommentValerie FreemanProposedself-stated1:41

Good evening there's flyers that I have been passed out. I'm Valerie Freeman, a local artist. On April 22nd, Saturday evening from 730 to 930 p.m., at OVA Arts Gallery Back Courtyard located at 2238 East Ojai Avenue we will host our first exterior immersive light art installation. The collaboration is a diversity of several local artists who will project an evolving hive of light expressions. The theme is Be Light, and all projections will have a honeycomb hexagon frame format shown simultaneously to fill the courtyard space.

This will be a celebration of Earth Night. One dynamic visual artist and creative technologist with 13 years of experience in projection art is Emily Ehlerd. Her work centers around finding harmony between sound and light frequencies, utilizing touch designer to create generative art that pulls data from her surroundings. Her public art and guerrilla projections challenge traditional notions of where art belongs and how it can be experienced.

New to Ojai, artist-designer Ben Grace embraced the opportunity to creatively collaborate. His passion for experience and emerging technology drives his interdisciplinary approach and appeals to a contemporary audience interested in spiritual and intellectual exploration. For Be Light, which is Ben's projector and computer will have an interface interactive element.

Another artist, Jamie Stratford is a first grade teacher and claymation artist living in Ojai. She loves using the art of stop motion to capture her audience for a precious 15 seconds or less. Her miniature movies feature miniature characters and miniature props. An Ohaiku will be projecting. We receive poems from around the world, including India, Indonesia, Croatia, across the United States and many from Ojai.

I have combined all of the spring haikus with images to project an earthly poetic cell within the hive. The fun evening event is free for the community. Please enter through the front door at Over Arts Gallery and enjoy strolling through the gallery filled with an array of arts and crafts as you make your way to the back courtyard for a new immersive light experience.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:39

Thank you very much, Valerie. Much appreciated. Next we have Ron with the library report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:49

All righty, thank you so much members of council. This is Ron Solorzano the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley just wanted to give you a little bit of an update There are a couple of things I wanted to mention that are coming up pretty soon One is actually a recurring event every second Thursday The mobile library and some of our library staff head on over to the Ojai community farmers market And we are there from I believe it's three o'clock to about 430 And we have our mobile library there, you can get a library card. You can talk with our staff and specifically we also have a story time at 330. So if anybody wants to join us for that, we will be at the Ojai Community Farmers Market Thursday April 13th which I believe is this week.

And in addition to that, this is another event. This one actually is put on by our Ventura County Library Foundation. They are a group that supports the libraries throughout Ventura County, our whole system not just Ojai but they have an event going on it's gonna be on Saturday April 22nd and it's called Rising From The Ashes. It is an event that highlights some of the homes. It's a home tour for homes that were rebuilt after the Thomas fire So if that's something that you're interested in, you're interested in supporting the Library Foundation, you can visit their website which is vclibraryfoundation.org to see about tickets. I think they're going fast so maybe check that out if you would like.

Two more things real quick. Recently at our library, we launched an additional entry in our Library of Things. Right now we have a limited number of sewing machine kits that are available. These are something that you can search for in our catalog. You can place a request for them or you can come into our library to see about getting yourself on the list. There are only a few right now so there will be a list but go ahead and ask our staff about them or again go online to check them out there.

And then finally, I wanted to mention that in the next couple of weeks we're very very excited to be introducing our new youth librarian to the community. Her name is Blanca Ramirez and she is coming to us again within the next couple of weeks and she'll be doing you know all sorts of good work with us most importantly she'll be taking over the story time That we offer on Wednesday mornings at 1030 and Additionally, she's going to be helping out with the parent and child together classes that are offered on Tuesday mornings And if you're curious about any of those again Just reach out to our library staff and we will answer any questions. You have that's it Thank you so much and take care.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role7:28

Thank you so much Ron much

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:29

appreciated Give me your email I'll try to find it on the internet. I have something to send you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed7:37

Oh, absolutely. Yeah I'll leave a card with the staff here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed7:40

Okay thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role7:42

Thank you Ron. Next we have Gail Birch then Ron McCrea and then David

CommentGail BirchProposedself-stated7:48

Wyand. Hi there, I'm Gail Birch. I've lived in Ojai for some 45 plus years and what brought me here tonight is on Easter Sunday well let me back up. I love walking in Libbey Park loved. The last few months I've discovered an explosion of trash And the gazebo. Have any of you been there recently? So, you know all the blankets, all the towels, all the trash, all the wrappers and it keeps escalating more and more. Easter Sunday, it reached a real peak where people were yelling expletives at... Oh yeah! It started with I think one woman and I thought oh she's down on her luck She'll move on eventually. Well, anyway it's she's obviously gotten a family of people who are there and I'm starting to feel unsafe walking in Libbey Park now. I'm not someone who's a shy violet.

I grew up outside New York City. I don't worry about people but it's it's a little sketchy okay? And when I pass there these guys are yelling they're yelling all kinds of stuff not at me or maybe at me. I don't really know but um I'm just wondering, is there something we can do to bring back our lovely gazebo so that people can actually use it for music and events as opposed to many people's domicile? Also, I see that there is an explosion of All kinds of aged men who kind of hang out nearby, who look like they're dealing something. I don't know because I don't buy or take part but I get the feeling that they think there's no law in Ojai. There we got the gazebo, we got this.

Anyway, I'm just wondering can we do something?

0:09 – 0:1712 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role9:46

Thank you Gail.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction9:50

Yeah, I can just note. I walked by the gazebo this morning and took a look and we talked a little bit about this last meeting but by state law there are limits to what we can do being homeless is not illegal so it's not something that we can force people out of certain areas but what we do commit to doing is if you see a crime call the police and the police will respond They'll address the crime and my understanding is the police have responded and have addressed some issues at the park, but it's going to be We need to kind of keep on that path if somebody sees something that looks like it's illegal call the police. That's really the answer

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role10:40

One further point on that front so While homelessness being unhoused is not criminal and is not approached in a criminal manner, other things such as the reference to potentially drugs being dealt or other crimes that are crimes. There's always the police department available and the non-emergency number for those who don't have it handy is 805-654-9511. That takes you directly to the Ojai Police Department and can be valuable resource as well. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role11:11

Thank you James, thank you Matt. Next we have Ron McCrea then David Wyand and then Wendy Larner.

CommentWendy LarnerProposed · by introduction11:21

I don't know if they're gonna be able to hear me over the pickleball over there. It's pretty loud Well, yeah, I'm here to complain about the pickleball noise What you can hear right out your window right now all of these neighbors around here. I live down here hear that seven days a week Yelling Can you hear it? I mean if this was your house, would that be okay seven days a week seven hours every day You don't get Sunday off nothing and And I understand that the park and Recreations are recommending possibly increasing the hours over there and send spending more money on mitigation than trying to prove To the neighbors here that we don't hear it. That's what their sound meters are trying to prove, that we don't hear it you know? The decimals or if they're over 55 well maybe we'll do something about it.

If they're under 40 Well, too bad. We'll just go ahead and let them play longer right? I mean you play every day Don't you I'm sure that's Leslie Most days The neighbors They can we all complain whenever for the last three years were complaining. You don't hear us. I mean but You know, for another $5,000 maybe you can pretend that it's invisible and we don't see it either.

It's every day like this where the meters, the decimals mean nothing to us. It could be 55 or 155 or four, it doesn't matter. All of this money you're spending on all this time and wasting with these meetings we can still hear it. I don't care if you had a dog barking in your yard and the neighbor went out there with his decimal meter and says it's under 40, you can't hear it?

You still couldn't sleep at night could you? It's annoying, can't you hear it right there? I suggest that you give them the pickle people. Six months to find another place. Go to Salt Park, wherever you want to go. You'll find it someplace and find something else. If you went over, you try to find some other places that will work. You went over to the skateboard place over there. They denied it. They wouldn't do it. Why? Because it's too close to homes. All these places, there's no place to have it. If you were starting all over again Would you have that out there? It's not your fault. It was the last City Council fault to put this here. Johnny Johnson says let's have it right out of there. Randy plays every night on that thing, everyday. The lady at the park and recs plays everyday.

Just move it and find someplace else. It annoys the neighbors. Thank you Ron. And just go ahead James.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction14:30

If I could, yeah. Just a quick update because the Parks and Rec Commission did create that ad hoc committee that looked into the pickleball issue and they worked on this for several months and I think just for anybody interested in this topic or anybody who's curious they provided their recommendation at Thursday's Parks and Rec meeting and it's a lengthy report with a lot of information So anybody in the public can read that. I don't believe, I read it and I don't believe they recommended increasing hours anytime soon. I think, I don't think that was part of their recommendations but those are available on our website under the Parks and Rec Commission people can read those and see what they had recommended so and that'll come to Council in probably two or three meetings.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role15:15

Okay, thank you. So it'll be back in a few meetings, Ron. Okay? Thank you. Next we have David Wyand then Wendy Lawyer then Larry Steingold.

CommentDavid WyandProposedself-stated15:25

Hi my name is David Wyand. I just came in to sort of follow up on what Gail was talking about and I was in the park on Easter and I noticed the encampment in the gazebo that was getting out of hand And I think it's a little close to the playground for something like that to be going on. So what i did is, I took the initiative to go talk to the police department yesterday they said that their hands were tied so I took the initiative to go down and talk to the homeless people yesterday Something worked because I went there today and all of the junk was cleaned out of the gazebo. There was maybe only three or four sleeping rolls in the gazebo, and my thing would be to have it put on the agenda for further talking at a At a later date at the City Council meeting and that way I would only started on this yesterday.

That way it would give me time to put together some type of presentation that I could offer to maybe find a place for the homeless people to go because I'm not against homelessness, and I'm not here to complain I just want to find solutions on what we could do to maybe put together a transitional housing situation for the homeless that wouldn't allow drinking or drugs on the premises. And the transitional part of it would be they would have Look for a job and try to better their lives And I would even go out and beat my feet and ask community businesses landscaping dishwashing whatever it may be To try to help me out with Getting jobs for the some of the homeless people to get them off the streets. I was one of the homeless people Four years ago I cleaned up my act and I just want to be a bridge between the community and the homeless people to try to find a solution to what we could do to help each other.

And that's all I have to say. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role17:46

Thank you David. I like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed17:48

your contact information if you can just write on a card and give it to Weston.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role17:54

Leslie? Excuse me, David? David can you come back for one second?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7917:59

I

0:18 – 0:2515 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8418:02

just wanted to say that we are later in the agenda discussing a housing advisory committee and it is possible, I mean it's obvious that unsheltered people are part of that umbrella. of housing and housing issues. So it may be that this will come up, and depending on how that particular item plays out, it may be that your suggestions and or expertise or willingness to contribute might be, there might be a place for it so I would say hang on and we're working on it, so thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed18:44

If you can wait about 15 minutes will probably be there on that item

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role18:48

Thank You David next we have Wendy Larner than Larry Steingold

CommentWendy LarnerProposedself-stated18:53

Good evening. I'm Wendy Larner and I am a resident of Ojai It's not is it Reasonable or appropriate for Matthew Summers to conduct a workshop on the Brown Act if he is compromised because he contributed to Brown Act violations? Did he allow and participate in discussion of items not on agenda of closed meeting? Did he facilitate The hiring of a law firm recommended by council to a plaintiff in a lawsuit filed against the city, did it create the opportunity for the City Council to secretly plot to acquire private property while the city was in an agreement with the owners that allowed them to develop that property?

Is he now helping cover up all of the above. Additionally if he and the city have not openly sanctioned the mayor for behind-the-scenes malfeasance Including conflicts of interest, collusion with an interest group. Leaking confidential city communication through same information though the same information is denied to the citizens of the city? Is he doing his job if Mr. Summers does not act in the City of Ojai's best interest does not encourage honesty, integrity and transparency in the conduct of city business and does not hold council members to the highest Brown Act requirements then Mr. Summers needs to step down and he certainly ought not to be involved in a Brown Act workshop. We need an objective legal advisor to conduct that meeting and we need an attorney for the city of Ojai to recommend to the City Council to have closed sessions recorded

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role20:54

Thank you, Wendy. And just to confirm the workshop will be held by an outside entity?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role21:01

Yes, we're working on a number of options for outside facilitators for the Brown Act Workshop with decades of experience on Brown Act issues.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8621:12

Can I add one thing? I just want to say that I really appreciate all that our staff does for us. Sometimes it can be a really thankless job, and so I really appreciate your work. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8421:25

I'd like to echo that. Thank you. Yeah, I just wanted to ask staff This is not just a Brown Act workshop. It is also a workshop on transparency Is that correct? Correct. Thank you. Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role21:39

you

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction21:41

Also will be open to the public and we're trying to lock in dates We're hoping to be able to announce those maybe by mid next week

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role21:49

Okay And also social media is on the docket.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8421:54

I'm sorry one more question will council have The ability to review the facilitator and their qualifications

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction22:03

I am I've spoken to several different possible facilitators, and I'm planning to send out information about the different options One challenge is per the Brown Act, the council can't make a decision outside of a council meeting. So I'm sort of working through how we're gonna do that and how that choice is made but there will be information provided. Great thank you very much

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role22:30

Okay, next we have Larry Steingold and then Dale

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed22:32

Hanson. Good afternoon, Larry Steingold I'm turning into that guy No one here wants Ojai to be LA let alone us if it did my children would want us to be closer If we wanted LA We would have moved to LA people stay here because they want to if they didn't want to they would leave But I'm stating the obvious except it puts everything on in context Do we want Ojai to be Greenacres?

I'm all for green acres, but I want my roads paved. We want to go back to 1974? Fine! But I want my roads paved. I want the pension paid for. All right? I want beat cops on the weekends that aren't grant-paid for. They should come out of income. We need more money. Okay? I'm here. I love it here. I like dark skies. A neighbor with a cockatoo on her shoulder. People riding donkeys. New friends. New conversations. Discussions. Learning and listening.

I want to be able to go out at 9 p.m. at night and hear nothing but animals and coyotes, but I also want paved roads. I'm not here to debate the ATP. You people have funded the damn thing. Now we're overfunding it, and Mr. Whitman, to his credit, has said we're not going to be able to buy things in the future—I'm paraphrasing. Why? Because we don't have enough money.

I give Mr. Vega credit, he's got to do a tap dance. He's got to fix all the things and find money for all the things you people want to spend. You voted for the Maricopa, where is the money going to come from? Okay, he stated the truth, he voted for it. Rent stabilization, I'm not against rent stabilization we need rent stabilization but the law was poorly written. You have two attorneys here Mr. Whitman is a longtime attorney, he's educated, he's trained.

Mr. Summers is trained and educated, too. They could have taken two weeks with people and have rewritten the law so it makes sense. So now we're going to go months and months and months, and there are going to be lawsuits, and there's going to be legal consequences and more money spent. And it's just not right either its incompetence or its intent. This is stupid. If we wanted to be Green Acres tell us but pave my roads. Do the things you're supposed to do.

Okay, this is not a problem. Are they going to record closed sessions from now on? Yes or no. If they aren't why? Is there a reason? But where are we gonna get the money? Raise the TOT, raise the sales tax I don't care but the roads aren't paved they're patched Pleasant today. They patched Pleasant you don't patch a road you're gonna pave does that mean they're not paving Pleasant please Thank you.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:25 – 0:3121 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role25:41

Thank you, Larry. And just for your information the next budget meeting will be on Thursday at 9. Okay do you want to comment?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction25:50

I was gonna say the same thing and then just the second point is that we are currently out to bid for paving and we've never had this discussion in a meeting but I'm pretty sure that if I asked every council member if they wanted to pave right this minute the answer would be yes But we are out to bid. We're following the state mandated, state law process which takes longer than we'd like but we're currently out to bid. We'r expecting to be able to open the bids and then bring an item to council to approve a bid in the next few weeks So we're working on that aggressively but just to answer the point Yes, we have a pothole crew going out right now because the rains tore up the streets. And so we're trying to prioritize that You know there it would have been great if it didn't rain and we didn't get a bunch more potholes right before We were paving but we are trying to do that right now some

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role26:42

And we had six questions about potholes and six potholes filled so far, right? So

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction26:48

that's a good start. Although I think we've got two more since then,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role26:50

so they're coming in. Okay next we have Dale Hanson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed26:58

Dale Hanson, I live in the city of Ojai. I'm here to talk about pickleball. It's been a long time we've been fighting this and what bothers me most of all, as we know pickleball is a wonderful sport outdoors meeting people and good exercise all that wonderful stuff but it is the fastest growing sport. And that's a concern. Is it gonna get worse? I don't know where we are with the Soule Park management with the county but I hope we're moving forward with it and I hope we can get everyone excited about going out there And when that happens, I certainly hope we close that court down. Because you yourself said one time and I so appreciate it, you're saying it, that there are different kinds of parks. This is not a park for that kind of activity.

If you look all across the country people are suing the regions where they live because pickleball isn't tenable if it's in a neighborhood. You can't live with it. You have no peace. And I think we have to face reality here and realize it doesn't work in the neighborhood. Please don't put it at Sarasota Park or any other park with their homes, you'll have the same problem. It's got to be out there. I questioned one of the neighbors that live out there, the closest neighbor to it, and I asked him, I said can you hear the noise from your park? He said oh no, there are orchards between me and my house, I don't hear it. And he himself said that would be a great place for it. He didn't care.

That's the closest neighbor to the Soule Park area. There you'll have bathrooms, you can have lights, you can have parking and no one to bother. No one yelling at you for doing something that shouldn't been done. I know when Ryan Blatz was here he said that oh it was a mistake we shouldn't have done it. Yeah! It was a mistake and it shouldn't have been done so why do we keep doing it? Please Please close that down and get the Soule Park going as soon as possible.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:00

Thank you. Thank you, Dale. Any update on Soule Park?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction29:05

I think the Parks and Rec Commission started to talk because the Parks and Rec Commission asked to be able to have some input on it so they started to talk about that at their last meeting and I think they're planning to agendize it for their next meeting to do a what we've asked them to do is sort of expedited review to keep kind of keep that moving

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:24

Great. Thank you, James. Weston, any comments online?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7529:27

No, Mayor. No raised hands.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:28

Okay. Thank you very much. All right. We will move on to the consent calendar. Is there a motion to approve?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:33

I'll move to approve.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7929:35

I'll second it. I'd like to pull a couple of items just so we can discuss them real quickly

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:40

if that's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7929:40

okay. D and E.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:42

D and E. Okay. Is there a motion to approve the rest?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:47

I'll move again to approve the rest.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:49

And I'll second it. Okay all in favor of approving everything except D and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:53

Aye.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role29:55

Okay, okay go ahead Andy D.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7929:58

All right so item D is the franchise agreement with Harrison and I just wanted to ask a couple of questions but start out by you know pointing out that This is the one place for the city where we as the City Council are really the only voice for the ratepayers who pay for their trash service. And so I was a little bit concerned that I did not see in the report anything that I could tell a ratepayer with confidence that were doing the right thing for them, And so I wanted to ask a few questions and just, we don't know the total amount of the fee. But I guess the more important question is how are the rates going to be under this new contract compared to the contract we have today? I guess it'd be question number one

0:31 – 0:4724 turns

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction31:24

So the extension request was simply for the five-year extension. It did not, typically when they submit requests they can either ask for just a straight time extension or a time extension with a fee increase. Harrison had just asked for a time extension so By default, this extension would not result in increases although they'd be able to do their standard increases as they can under their current agreement which they typically consider once a year.

So this doesn't include any additional fee increase it just would continue the current contract for five years and allow for those annual fee increases

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7932:11

okay and then does this does the agreement include a franchise fee?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction32:23

Yes.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7932:24

And how are we using the

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction32:25

franchise fee? There's a few, well actually so there's a couple things that we fund with it but I don't have complete information on that handy but for example we actually do, the city has a solid waste services contractor who's paid for from that who provides analysis and things related to our solid waste services trash services But I can there's no Well, there is a deadline on this but the deadlines not tonight So if if the council wants more detail we can bring a report back in two weeks with more detail

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7933:03

on it Okay. So I have a few I have a few more questions and then that could potentially be part of that but So with AB 939, which was adopted maybe 20 years ago we were required as a city to divert at least 50% of our trash away from the landfill into recycling or composting. Other methods and It looks like with the materials that you gave us that we are Struggling to hit the 50% mark. Mm-hmm, and so I'd be very interested in having Harrison explain Why we're having an issue with that and what we can do to make sure that we do achieve that. I understand that we are potentially subject to penalties if we don't hit the 50% diversion.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction34:14

And my understanding and Actually, so it sort of works with what we were suggesting because Harrison couldn't be here tonight because they're scheduled at Fillmore tonight doing their Update but they can be her next meeting so we can have them answer But my understanding is that they're struggling sort of across Ventura County. So I think they can explain why that why that is Okay,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7934:36

and then I understand that we have, we're required by law to have new containers and just wondering if that's encompassed within the franchise agreement or is that going to be an additional fee that ratepayers are gonna have to pick up? And that could be another thing that goes to a subsequent meeting.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction35:03

Yeah, we could bring that back with the other

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7935:04

information and then my my other comment is Is on e and that and and Harrison would maybe be the ones to answer or maybe in conjunction with the city, but somewhat related. Yeah E is also a trash diversion item for the for the new rule in terms of How we're to dispose of our food waste. And the report says that the county is going to take care or Harrison at the county is going to take care of the reporting requirements in terms of receiving it, but it seems like there almost certainly is going to be requirements at RN at the city. For at least some data to be gathered.

And so we are going to have some fiscal impact on that and I would like us to start figuring out how we're going to address that. It makes sense to me that if a place like Fillmore, maybe some of the other cities Are going to be faced with the same thing that potentially we find a shared position between multiple cities To address that data collection Data, you know the information that we're gonna have together. Yeah and I Think I guess my final comment isn't exactly on this point but One of the boards that I sit on, every item on a report starts with a fiscal impact analysis and a statement Well, their statement is this mandatory. I'd actually like to see a statement that says what are the rules that apply?

Just so we know if there's some state law or maybe it's our own laws but so that we can actually look at the rules and laws that should be impacting our decision making. Got it,

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction37:53

yeah. And just briefly to that this is one of the phrases that we've said a lot lately and cities say a lot lately is unfunded state mandates and this is kind of another great example of that where the state says cities need to do something I need to figure it out need to pay for it So this, the idea with that MOU was all the cities are struggling with it. The county's struggling with it so let's all you know form signed an MOU and work together and like hire one person so every agency doesn't have to hire their own staffing for this But it does tie in somewhat with the Harrison item. Neither are time sensitive Well, like I said they have deadlines but the deadline isn't between now and the next meeting So I think my suggestion would be that we bring those back We can put them as sort of maybe one discussion item on the April 25th agenda to have Harrison come do a presentation and explain so

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7938:52

I think it'd be good

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction38:53

just

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7938:55

Just for the ratepayers to know that they came and yeah, talk to us about all the money We're gonna spend on them

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction39:01

know what they're getting for what I pay.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8639:03

Yeah Rachel yeah also so I actually took a tour of EJ Harrison's facilities today And I recommend all of my colleagues do, because what they're doing with food waste in particular is something that I think needs they're only getting about 5% participation. And food waste is a major contributor to climate change if it goes into the landfills. So that's something that hopefully they're going to talk about next week, too. I think one thing that was an eye-opener was just that there were certain that recycling is only as good as the market that's able to receive the recycling items. And so I was wondering if maybe that percentage was also because China isn't taking as many plastics and things like that.

But Nan Drake at Harrison is just a wealth of information, and she's been so helpful in answering some of my questions about the contract but also about where our trash goes.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7940:13

And I'll make one final comment is that by asking all these questions, I should also go on the record as saying I've been an EJ Harrison customer for over 30 years. And I don't have something against Harrison. I actually think we're very fortunate to have a local business as opposed to a national business serving us, and I do recognize that they do a lot for our community.

I just wanted to make sure that there was more information for the public to understand when their rates, you know, when they're paying their bill what they're getting.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction40:53

Yeah, to give them some credit people may remember about a year ago. Another unfunded state mandate went into effect and we had to separate everybody was gonna have to separate their waste even more with plastic bags inside of the trash cans and We reached out to Harrison and told remind or you know They sort of knew but we reminded them that we in Ojai, you know, we don't Support using things like styrofoam or plastic bags and things like that And so they actually Went out of their way to create that program where they brought buckets to To our public works department and we had hundreds of people come get these buckets to help meet those goals, so They've been very good about being sort of sensitive to the needs of Ojai in the community But I also I don't think they'll have any problem coming in and presenting and giving more information next meeting.

So

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role41:45

Yeah, very responsive. Appreciate that. Anything else?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8441:49

Yeah so thank you Andy for the due diligence and I've also taken the tour it's quite a trip and I think James to your point it was really confusing for Ohioans when we were told to put the food scraps in a plastic bag To then put it into the yard waste. That was really tricky to understand, so that they were willing to sort of change that to make it more convenient and make a little bit more sense but I think As a city, we haven't really been able to tackle and really understand that food decomposes into methane which is really bad.

So maybe we can think about some sort of educational outreach or maybe they have something in the works already for other communities around that I think would be really helpful.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction42:51

Yeah, that's a good point. They do try to do sort of like monthly What do they call it flash then yeah flash watch I think somebody said Trash watch okay? Yeah, and they do a monthly newsletter But both us and them could maybe do another effort at that because it is it's confusing It's another new thing we all have to deal with

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8643:15

And one other thing, too. Thank you is that well they the food waste because I dug into this topic The food waste is a stepping stone They're trying they were working on permitting for a facility for composting and And so this is like a stepping stone that's required by state law and And I think it's a good opportunity for us just to mention here right now too that we have a community garden that does composting and that if people really wanted to have an even better way to discard their food waste, that would probably be something that would be good to explore.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role44:02

Great, thank you. And thank you council and thank you staff for your efforts and response. We look forward to hearing back about that. All right we will go and move on to discussion item number two affordable housing advisory committee. James is there a staff report?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction44:19

Yeah, just very brief on this one. The council had asked to discuss this item. Apologies I think we had it on two or three agendas that went very late so it's on a little bit later than expected. But there was a couple key points we wanted to let people know. One thing was, we started to look at what other cities were doing and other cities that are in a situation like Ojai where they're part of an area housing authority where most of the funding goes Typically create committees that they call advisory committees, which kind of indicates that since the funding doesn't come to the city there's a limit to what the city can do as far as we don't get any sort of funding to actually build units.

So, the report talks a little bit about how the area housing authority works. How that funding goes to the area housing authority and then the housing authority looks countywide and then sort of builds where they see the needs and they've built projects in Ojai but it has been awhile because they're looking kind of across the county. And so that is why the item is referred to as the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. I think the idea would be that the committee, if formed, would serve the City Council by advising the council on potential housing policies.

One of the key points we sort of talked through in the report is, we looked at other cities and how they have done these. There's sort of three main ways that cities have set up these committees. One is that some cities have created a five-member committee where it's two council liaisons, two planning commission liaisons and one member at large Other cities created an advisory committee where there was three residents and then, or citizens.

And then two council members. And then we didn't mention in the report and we didn't realize it until we got some comments. Maybe we just sort of thought it was the obvious one but I didn't mention it is that a lot of cities also just create where each council member appoints one resident and there's five residents on the advisory committee I think we also received a comment pointing out that that's an option that wasn't mentioned in the report.

As far as next steps, so the item is on for the council to discuss it and consider creating it. If created, it's good practice to then have bylaws be adopted that spell out exactly what the scope of the committee is and who will be on it and how the positions will be filled and sort of all those practical details of it So the report included a sample from another city, City of San Ramon of their housing committee bylaws which looked pretty good and could serve as a sample. But if the council created such a committee we would recommend that we'd come back at one or probably the next two meetings with some bylaws for the council to review and approve so with that we're happy to answer any questions.

0:47 – 0:559 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role47:43

Thank you, James. Any questions from council?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8447:45

Yeah I have a question. Did you consider the suggestions that council has made as well as that have come in and comments about having a stakeholders committee made up of various stakeholders and their concerns whether you be a land use attorney or you be attendance rights I was wondering if that had been considered.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction48:28

That's not necessarily in conflict with the like the five resident or five citizens being appointed because The council could identify what categories each citizen would be appointed in as so we didn't get into detail on that But that is sort of it's an option that would tie in with that of you know, if the council said one of the appointments has to be a You know Let's say realtor. I don't you know, I'm just talking off the top of my head another candidate has to be a So that would be something that we can we can identify We just we hadn't gotten to that level of detail yet. Okay? Thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role49:05

Any other questions? No, we will move on to public comment first. We have severa Laura

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed49:18

Thank You madam mayor fellow Council members and staff, chief. I am for committing an advisory housing or affordable housing committee. I think this is something that is way overdue and it is a very complex issue. And I know that you need to construct the best advisory committee but I urge you not to get stuck and to compromise, collaborate because this issue is affecting a lot of people. The people that are leaving are vital to our community not just because they could potentially have kids in their school district, but there are seniors. There are artists. There are people that are trying to contribute to this community in many ways, but they can't afford to live here. That's something in common that they have.

The community is changing, we're aging. We have more families, individuals that are coming that have more money which isn't bad. I welcome them just as I would welcome anybody else to come and enjoy Ojai. And I want you to think about it in that sense, is that right now we have declined in populations according to our consensus. I don't know the last ones. We rarely build.

I've just talking to a young couple that are deciding to move away from from Ojai and this is everywhere. I understand Ojai is not the ultimate solution to everyone's problem. But the fact is that we don't have the same opportunity that other communities do to grow here. I grew up here in this community, I know how nice it is, I know how lucky we are to be living around the mountains and be able to enjoy the environment, other individuals that are like-minded but we're losing that, and that's what I'm afraid of. I've sat on the other side of the table where I've tried to collaborate and move and work with different organizations because again if we're gonna do something first of all we gotta do it right second of all we gotta put a structure in that will be effective and that will touch all the issues and concerns We got to let it all out on the table And that's my approach, that would be something that I would encourage you guys to model because I want there to be diversity in this community and not just people that have the funds but also that gives us a better sense of community.

So thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role52:20

Thank You Severo. Weston any comments online?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7552:23

Yes, mayor we have five raised hands first. We'll have Marcy Tosher followed by Bill Miley and then Steve Quillacy Marcy you have the floor

CommentSteve Quillacy MarcyProposed · by introduction52:37

Good evening everyone creating an affordable housing advisory committee Is not advisable in my opinion, although at 1st blush a housing committee might seem to be a good idea. Our local recent experience has proven it not to be the case communities have little credibility and Ojai just last year city decided to appoint a resident to the budget committee. The former mayor of the council, without discussion and with a clear agenda declined to appoint applicant Johnny Johnston someone with decades of financial expertise and leadership. He restored the city of Ventura to fiscal solvency.

He managed Ojai's finances as the young city manager and he also led Ventura County as its CEO. It was a telling moment when in which the community received the message that committees are expected Tow the line. Committees have little success in Ojai. The last housing committee created in approximately 2008 was basically a special interest group trying to dictate to Ojai for its own purposes. It was a committee chosen by a pro-development council comprised of real estate investors and professionals, and serving the interests of the developer lobby. A committee is no better than the motivations of those suggesting its formation. Please think about who is pushing for this committee now and consider a more inclusive approach that values input from all stakeholders equally.

A separate housing committee is not necessary, we already have community development department planning commission input from the county housing authority and a general plan through 2045 to guide you. Special interests will find their way onto any committee you create. The special interests want to have a voice that can do their own research and present their findings to you, not as a formal committee but in a voluntary non-binding report. Finally committees require time effort and money from city staff and a budget that is already stretched then. You can however preserve staff time and money for creation and implementation of new housing initiatives, and grant all stakeholders an equal voice through volunteered workshops or focus groups to gather advice from the economically threatened and marginalized populations in Ojai.

That information can also be presented presented to you as a non-binding report for your consideration, much like what the Green Coalition is doing now with the City Hall campus. By taking this more informal inclusive egalitarian and democratic approach rather than establishing a more binding housing committee you will truly give the people a voice and uphold your responsibility to represent all of the voters who elected you and to set policy as you were elected to do thank you for your time Thank you, Marcy.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role55:28

We have Skip to move in the house.

0:55 – 1:0112 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed55:33

Good evening council members and Mayor Sticks. I'm a resident of Langley. Get my town right, Ojai. And when I heard the suggestion and the word used of stakeholders as an approach to the appointment of committee members, that raises a red flag to me Because I think I agree with the last speaker stakeholders could be anybody in the community who needs a place to live or stakeholders and when you talk about realtors and construction people and Real estate appraisers. I used to be a real estate appraiser deal are these stakeholders?

Or they're just people with a Economic interest in a certain type of policy. You don't know but the thing is what it leaves out is Elements people in our community who are not plugged into the system They're stakeholders because they need places to live. These would be maybe lower economic level people or People that work in the basic industrial maintenance jobs They need a certain type of housing I would like to I would much prefer to see people from our reach out in our community and People who deal with housing personally rather than this whole kind of stakeholders voodoo kind of chat So, thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role57:15

Thank You skip We're back online Weston

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7557:18

yes next we have Bill Miley followed by Steve Quillacy and El Caldwell Mr. Miley you have the floor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed57:27

I Am here, I hope you can hear me

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7557:29

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed57:31

Hello. I sent a detailed email to your council about all of this, so my thoughts on the committee's creation are these. It should be all city residents composed of about seven members, no council members or planning commission members as they will get their legal opportunity and right to craft the committee or decide yes or no. A planning commission member should be assigned to help the committee or reference and process purposes.

The committee should have a staff person for support, preferably someone at the city manager administrative level. The committee should have primary responsibility to the City Council as progress reports and conclusions should be directed to both the Planning Commission and the City Council at the same time The committee's composition should include input from all stakeholders, and I like the term.

In my email, I suggested 18 of them not to be on the committee but just for input. However, I suggest the membership representatives of seven particular groups be thought about. Help at Bohai, the county housing agency Hawaii Realty Association, Chamber of Commerce, Hawaii Unified School District and then two representatives of renters with financial rent burdens.

The key will be the goals and objectives established by the City Council assigned to the committee. And the main one should be this Identifying the housing needs statements in the cycle six Ojai City Housing Element, notably in the document charts and using two previous housing element cycle documents, cycle five and cycle four. In summary this is a hugely important committee for the human future of our city. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role59:52

Thank you Bill.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7559:53

Next we have Steve Quillacy, followed by Elle Caldwell and then Jamie Fleming. Mr. Quillacy, you have the floor?

CommentJamie FlemingProposed · by introduction1:00:02

Thank you. I have to respectfully disagree with some of the previous speakers. I believe that there should be planning commissioners on this ad hoc committee, this advisory committee you're talking about as a part of the general plan update Your planning commission has gone into great detail on the housing element of the general plan. And in fact, under the direction of a prior council we had set up two ad hoc committees one on affordable housing, one on parking and the commissioners were happy to take on that extra work. We're not worried about that part but both of those are suspended at this moment Waiting for direction from this new council.

Council member Lang was kind enough to be our liaison at the last planning commission meeting and said that decisions had not yet been made as to the composition of the committee, but I would advocate that you have a couple of planning commissioners on there. We are already fairly knowledgeable about the subject and we are willing to put the work in Advise the City Council on housing matters. Thank you very much.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:01:27

Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:01:27

you,

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:01:27

Steve. Next we have Elle Caldwell followed by Jamie Fleming and then Becky. Elle, you have the floor?

1:01 – 1:1715 turns

CommentElle CaldwellProposed1:01:43

Chasing a little unmute button around. Can you hear me?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:01:47

Yes.

CommentElle CaldwellProposed1:01:48

OK, thanks. I really urge you to move forward with alacrity on getting something going in this regard. I really like what Mr. Laura said and what Mr. Miley said. The most important thing to me is that you have wide community input of the, what I would like to say the stakeholders and primarily renters And primarily anyone else who is really in a pinch around housing here. I'm a senior myself and I'm lucky enough to have won the lottery to be on Whispering Oak's waiting list of three to five years, and that is really the only secure housing available for seniors with low income here in town.

Anyway, I just want to say again, I urge you to move forward on this. I would hope that this committee would look at many of the new kinds of housing that's available out there such as manufactured homes that can be much less expensive than building from scratch. Anyway thank you very much and I look forward to being someone who We'll be involved with this committee, not necessarily on it. Thanks very much. Bye.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:03:09

Thank you, Al. Next we have Jamie Fleming followed by Becky and then Renee. Jamie, you have the floor?

CommentJamie FlemingProposed1:03:17

All right. This is Jamie Fleming, Ojai Valley Chamber of Commerce. If you decide to set up this committee I would just recommend we do not forget just by looking at how much traffic goes leaves and comes into this town, we have a lot of people who can't afford to live here who work here in Ojai. And so I am encouraging that at least some representation or at least input gets brought to the table from the large employers, which would include the hospital. I would think our school teachers but I also think we need to really focus on our service type industry, which really is kind of a major mainstay in Ojai.

Our hotels and our restaurants have these challenges every month to try and staff and make it so that these places can be open for us And our stores. So from the business sector, I would hope that there'll be some representation for input because and especially, I mean my gosh they in all their employees are probably commuting in El Roblar you know they're going to have restaurant and hotel employees all in this service so I just think none of them these employees will be able to afford to live in our town which is sad That needs to be a reality to be faced and also included in the discussions. Anyway, that was just my thought.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:04:53

Thank you, Jamie.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:04:54

Next we have Becky followed by Renee. Becky, you have the floor?

CommentBecky WindenwoodProposedself-stated1:05:02

Thank you James and good evening everyone. I'm Becky Windenwood and I've been a resident of this area for 21 years. Thank you again to the City Council members who voted to pass rent stabilization It's a great start that showed your willingness to consider the needs of all of Ojai's residents as you address our housing crisis. Your job now is to protect and build on that progress by gathering information, not from just a tiny housing advisory committee that could be dominated by special interests but by including as your advisors the entire community especially those who will be most severely impacted by your decisions Mr. Lara mentioned an affordable housing committee, and that's the very first time I've heard the word affordable combined with the words Housing Advisory Committee.

That is where the emphasis needs to be on true housing affordability for locals not for developing more tourism or housing for outsiders that only increase competition for housing and consequently prices. Even without a formal housing committee, you can be sure that the special interest groups will be very vocal with you about their vision for Ojai as they have already been in council meetings on social media and in the Ojai Valley news. Mr. Quillacy has already expressed the planning commission's desire to offer their input.

To balance that input, I propose a series of focus groups with the most impacted stakeholders. Like the input of special interests these focus groups could be run by community volunteers who would not be formal and would not be formal advisory committees nor would they require any city staff or budget rather they could bring back to you the concerns needs hopes and creative ideas of those most likely to be marginalized In a country in a country that is where, excuse me, most likely to be marginalized and how they might be able to help them.

Ojai City Councils have prioritized the desires of the few over the needs of the many in the past and they have created or contributed to many of the problems we are facing today. It's time to do something new, creative and far less burdensome to city staff and budgets. Let the people of Ojai speak directly to you rather than having their voices filtered through a tiny housing committee.

You five council members and no others were chosen by the voters to make decisions for the community. Please do not give away your decision-making responsibility and power to those who are not elected by your constituents. Thank you.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.751:07:50

Thank you, Becky. Last raise hand we have is Renee. Renee, you have the floor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:07:57

Okay, I pressed unmute. Okay, Renee is talking. Good evening council members. I am so happy we got this on the agenda and we're talking about this early in the evening. I think this is the third time it's been on the agenda and I'm so happy it's here. The vast majority, as I think we all know of Ojai citizens know that we are in a housing crisis. And I really want our community to get this right. I know, I really do know and believe that we can work together to identify what groups of people are housing insecure Those who are needing assistance to help them with their rent burdens during times of great need.

We need some affordable housing, we need some workforce housing. But I think one of the best things that this group could do is help identify where is the greatest need? Where is the greatest need and how can we go about addressing that need? We know we've got an unhoused community living in the park. We have an unhoused community that has to send their children to school.

We know we have an unhoused community that are living in vans and moving their vans around Every 72 hours, because that's what the law requires. So what is the greatest need? The area of greatest need I really do believe that if we can bring the community together, we can solve this problem and that is my greatest hope is that we can have something that we ca do as a community to help those in the greatest need. I think we can all feel good about coming together To try to help those who are in need. One of the things that I would like to see is having some kind of a voucher program for individuals who are experiencing homelessness, I've worked to try to help people get into the shelter.

And I worked to help people get blankets at night because it was really cold. So, I've done different things and I realized there's a large variety of needs. James, I want to thank you because I really appreciate your staff report today Because what you did is, you said many cities are taking action in this area. We don't have to reinvent the wheel. Let's learn from those that are doing the greatest good. What are those best practices? And let's come together to solve this problem. Thank you very much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:10:57

Thank you very much. We'll move on to discussion. Anyone like to begin? I'm just going to start with an

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:11:05

introduction to the idea, because this is a huge topic with so many levels of complexity. I don't think it's an either or, that you have just elitist stakeholders. And I also want to try to deal with some of the semantics around this. Stakeholders to me are tenants as well including very low income, including homeless and unsheltered people. Anyone who has a stake in the problem is a stakeholder. I don't mean to say that it's people, you know, that there is a group that will make decisions for people. So let's be really...I want to be really clear about that, is that when we talk about stakeholders, I am talking about the complete range of people who are affected by the housing situation in Ojai.

But I see this as A very large and very complex issue. Both Susan and I, and I think the Council got a paper from a think tank in Berkeley about teasing apart what you actually mean and what are the different sort of housing issues. There are unhoused, there are low income folks who can't find homes, there's gentrification, there're people that they are selling their homes and new people are moving in with costs that no locals could possibly afford a million plus for a starter house in my neighborhood So this is an incredibly, incredibly large problem and often the tension between the different stakeholders will come to the fore.

So when we talk about stakeholders I think we're also talking about The help of Ojai, who this is their bread and butter. This is what they do so they're going to bring a level of expertise that I certainly don't have and in no way do I expect the community to be Shut out of this process I don't think it's an either or maybe it's a group of recommendations that that then go out to the entire community and it is indeed like the World Cafe that the Green Coalition has where everyone can participate in every one. Can give feedback but I do also believe that initially you're gonna need informed, dedicated people because I think it's going to be a very long sort of process and committed. I think we need committed people so that's where I kind of want to start the conversation and for me I've always said people of goodwill in honest intentions can figure things out And that to me is the greatest requirement, is honest intentions and goodwill to solve this problem in a collaborative way.

And what this looks like I don't yet know. I would like to hear from other council members who may have been thinking about this. How does it start? What's the middle? What's the end? It may be that this is not a conversation that can be finished In this particular, you know at this particular meeting but and maybe I'm overthinking it Maybe it's not really as complex as I think it is But I think it's even more complex than I think it is. Honestly, so

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:15:00

thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:15:01

Thank you Rachel

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:15:02

Yes So just to piggyback on what councilmember rule said This is a very complex issue and I was actually at the conference this weekend Where that paper at the Bioneers conference, where that paper as part of a think tank that we're talking about. So I actually heard so many talks about this issue in terms of justice, in terms of housing equity, environmental justice and things like that.

And one of the things that was a big takeaway was that there are just so many innovative startups and there are so many people who are doing incredible things to really address the problems of affordable housing, not just here in California but nationwide. And one thing that I kept hearing in the public comments was the community involvement And I think, I loved the World Cafe process that the Green Coalition did. I left feeling like the whole community's coming together to envision what this property could be because that was what we were talking about But there was a real energy, a real vibrant energy. You had people from all different generations, children, you know middle schoolers talking and so I think that maybe what we could do is instead of forming, I do think we need a committee.

But instead of having us structure it with our staff involvement and rather than talking about the structure of the committee maybe we could have a visioning committee or a steering committee leading those World Cafe events and then from that we start, that starts the process of really identifying what are our needs and what is the best way to structure a committee that would follow the Brown Act. What is the best way to address this?

And so that's just one thing that I propose or I wanted to bring up for discussion.

1:17 – 1:3212 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:17:22

So could I just, yeah. And then I just wanted to say so that's kind of flipping it on how you start. So you would start with the World Cafe to get a backbone and then take it from there basically and get everyone's buy-in, everyone's contribution not necessarily buy in?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:17:42

Yeah well so my thought would be instead of having it being like an ad hoc committee or like it would be a visioning committee that would lead the process And and then from those workshops we could we could create more of a structured committee, right? That's that's my thought.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:17:59

Thank you Are you suggesting it's a committee run through the city?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:18:03

I I'm suggesting that we don't know if that what I'm suggesting is that we take it to the community first and And before we bring it into the city, because there are issues of staff time. There are issues of you know sometimes when you have a committee that adds layer of bureaucracy to things and as we're discovering with certain which is great I love bureaucracy. I'm a part of this government so not opposed to it. But when we're making decisions Related when the Planning Commission's making decisions when we're making decisions here that the voters have elected us to make my concern is that? We might be limited in making decisions if If word if we're having to delay those for a committee to meet an order for us to get recommendations So my thought is take it to the community first and then decide how we want to structure the committee great.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:18:59

I Andy or Susan.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:19:01

Yeah, I'll jump in so when the idea first came up to Potentially have a committee. I mean my first thought having been through multiple Workshops that were put on by the city in the past To discuss housing usually in the context of the general plan or the housing element that a workshop is the right idea. And yes, it could lead to a committee but I think more importantly, a workshop would lead to goals.

What is it that we're trying to achieve? And I think the workshop what I would envision is that we bring people in who have expertise. We talked about somebody from the Area Housing Authority as being an important source of information, knowing what we can do. I have this kind of crass idea that there isn't that much that we can do as a city unless we have a bunch of money And then the tricky decision is how do we use the money?

I can't tell you how disappointed I've been by the fact that kind of early in our discussions as a council, I was envisioning oh this is a place where we can make some money. We can raise some money this way. Those funds could be diverted towards housing You know people have talked about having subsidies for renters well that takes money and I don't envision us telling our Residents that we're gonna raise, you know We're gonna impose them with a tax but there are ways creative ways to raise money And I don't even know what those are. I mean, I have a few ideas But you know I think that, I agree with the concept that the five of us are ultimately the policy makers for the city.

We were elected to do the job. I want to listen to everybody in the community to hear what they see What they would like to see for our community. I think it's very important that we hear from James in particular and potentially Lucas but staff to manage this is a huge issue and I think it's much I think would be much more manageable to have a workshop to bring in the types of people that Rachel mentioned as being innovative, how do you create Living opportunities that are outside the box, that don't depend on building a whole bunch of houses but create You know a new model for housing opportunities which I think is what you were talking about.

I'm very interested in how we can do things like. I think there's a lot that we can do with ADUs again if we have money But if we were able to make it easier for a homeowner to make the decision to build an ADU, that they would then assign agreements to keep that ADU affordable. And they somehow had set plans that didn't have to take years and thousands and thousands of dollars to get through planning, to ever be at the point of actually building.

I think that I would like staff to think about the type of people that we could bring in for a workshop, to talk about what we can do because I'm just talking about things off the top of my head to a certain degree. But I think more than anything, we need ideas Gather all the ideas find out what is Something that the Community can agree on and Then you know, how do we move forward with? That would be my vision of Of what we do. I'm concerned that a minute that another committee is going to potentially You know, create diversions.

But I'm willing to look at that after having a workshop context where we understand and maybe agree to some goals that we can then say okay well the committee could be helpful in gathering this information To achieve those goals where maybe? Staff might be too overburdened to be you know have that put on them but I I see the use of the committee more for You know people who can gather information and ideas as opposed to Tell us, you know what they think. I agree with those Public comments that said, you know I'm worried that a committee is going to end up in a restriction of thoughts and ideas as opposed to an expansion. And we should be looking for an expansion.

I don't think we should expect to solve housing affordability But I think that we should endeavor to improve the lot of every person who lives in our city and that includes people struggling to afford to live here. So, we need to figure out how do we do that? This is probably supposed to go at the end of the meeting But I'm going to throw it out now because all these ideas I have that I want to see on our agenda are ideas that fit within this.

I would like to see us address an ordinance or, I want to see the pros and cons and alternatives to some type of regulation of fractionalized housing. There was an article in the Times last week. It's being viewed as a big threat to affordability.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:27:41

What does fractionalized mean?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:27:43

It's when you sell a home to eight people, different ownership, six or eight or whatever it is and it's basically a version of a timeshare. And it is resulting in the cost of those houses going up astronomically because you can buy in a small share. I'd like to see us look at an ordinance for inclusory housing so that when we build multifamily projects, Whatever affordable housing is included in that, it's going to be included in that project so that we're promoting a community where the affluent and the less affluent are living together.

I'd like us to look at the concept that I understand other communities have adopt have adopted which is a vacancy fee for second third fourth fifth sixth and seventh homes, I Again, I'm just looking for the pros the cons. I the alternatives because I don't know the answers to any of these. I'm not saying I want these, but I think these are things that we have to consider.

I would like to see us look at a fee or tax for sales of homes that are over and we can come up with the number. I am just going to say 1.25 million dollars And that for whatever amount is over that amount, the purchaser is required to pay a percentage of that total. As you know possibly the seed money for us having a land bank that you know, so That this all fits that concept in particular and the vacancy fee fits in with the idea. Okay? Where can we take places where housing is Generating the potential for raising money That we can put into the city's coffers and then benefit our housing market.

Benefit our community in particular. If we did end up going towards a committee, I would not. I agree with those comments including the city of San Ramon which would require one that each person on the committee be a resident of the city and number two not have planning commissioners or City Council as members of the committee Because both the Planning Commission and the City Council are ultimately going to be making decisions that are potentially going to be kind of distorted, and conflicts of interest would be difficult to avoid when you're involved in the committee process.

and then having it come up to council for decisions. And I think we all have plenty to do without being on a committee. All right, I think I've said more than enough to get my ideas across but that's where I'm thinking at this point.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:31:25

Did you want to make a comment, Matt? Yeah, two brief

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:31:28

comments if I may. One we provided a report last year at some point on the fractionalized housing model to the then-council. I'll be happy to recirculate that and that can be incorporated into a discussion. There are some options to regulate it and it's being litigated up in Sonoma County. And I confess, I don't have right at hand the latest status of that lawsuit but the matter is being litigated. There's one startup in particular that has been robust in developing the model.

And then second on those future agenda items I think staff would ask if the council's wish is to have If a committee is created are those first item on the committee or as I understand counselor Whitman's request for those to come to counsel Independent of the committee with pros cons and options in which case we look for a second at the future agenda items moment

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:32:18

More in the workshop. Yeah Can you just answer that question though Andy or you're

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:22

not sure so my thought in terms of addressing these issues is that

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:32 – 1:4711 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:32:38

Assuming that we have this workshop within 60 to 90 days, then by all means let's address them there. I don't know if we could get a straw poll tonight but potentially we get people to come and talk about These concepts

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:33:00

should should we I'm sorry, just a quick question about process for those suggestions There could be you know a list of suggestions That could be vetted and you know be part of the initial workshop that is you know whether it's a You know vacancy tax or you know, there's there's many many kinds of things that we could seed the community conversation with and right topics that we could seed with those being you know for and Probably, you know another ten floating out there That's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:33:41

my thought is that? We need to figure out ways to raise money How much money could we then divert into a fund that was going to allow us to have programs and what would be the right use of money if we got some money? that we had some discretion to use. Would it be for like the ADU idea? Would it be for trying to acquire property that could become affordable housing?

All of that is stuff that we need to figure out, have a goal but I think it's the City Council that needs to do that but with input and direction from the city.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:34:34

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:34:36

first, the article I think that Councilwoman Leslie and Rachel spoke of is called deconstructing the housing crisis. It was published November of 2022 and it's really easy to find online and I've posted on Facebook. It's well worth reading, it really shows you know identifies all the problems. It's a very holistic And I'm going to try to continue the conversation that you started, because I agree with all the things you identified.

But what I want to say first is I see this whole process as a test to see if we can work together without vilifying each other. And in the past, and even over the years and in recent weeks and even in days there's been a tremendous amount of misunderstanding and hostility and assumptions on both camps. You know they're supposed to...there's a camp that one group thinks just wants to build anything, whether it's affordable or not. That doesn't exist. I think if we really sat down and spoke with each other you'd be surprised that we do have very common goals.

I mean, I don't appreciate when people call me the, what did they call me? The darling of the STRs somebody called You know, among other you know just because I've reached out and I talked to a wide range of people. And it doesn't mean you know I'm interested to hear what they want to say doesn't mean I agree with everything but I think as council members our job is to reach out and speak to the whole community And so on that list that you started, I definitely want to put the 30-day rentals because in my own housing search, I continually see 30-day furnished rentals. Some of them are priced fairly but You know, most people that are here to stay do not want an already furnished 30-day rental. There is a market for that and a fair market. People that maybe are working here for part of the year or whatever but I think we need to look at that loophole in the whole STR ordinance to see what we can legally do To about that, and I know we brought that up before but let's you know make that official.

And then I asked, I think back in January, and I know your maybe even last year. What we've already tried to do, I want to have so staff will have to gather information and I think you already have it. I want to identify all city properties identify all current projects in the works, and that includes projects that have recently gone before the Planning Commission but they've disappeared off at least the public radar.

All projects in the recent past, even maybe five years ago, ten years ago, that were rejected I want to know what the status of that fund that we put in the $50,000 housing place in Ventura County. Because they want to help us right? They can help finance, they can provide money for projects as far as I know

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:38:32

Yeah, we provided $50,000 in funding to the Ventura County Trust Fund. And like the, a bug just flew at my face, like the Area Housing Authority of the county of Ventura, they look county-wide so they have that funding and then they're looking county-wide but last we checked they weren't planning any projects in Ojai. We can follow up on that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:56

though. They wouldn't be doing the planning, we would go to them right?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:39:01

Or affordable housing developers seeking funding would go to them as a funding resource. We're not currently available with any affordable housing projects in the city that have sought funding from that resource, but it is a resource available if they meet underwriting standards.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:39:14

Okay and I do want to, I know that this is going to be a long process but I don't want us to forget the people that are currently in a true emergency. So if we can identify the properties that the city owns we need to put some kind of emergency housing In my opinion, and it exists. In Ventura they've got or wherever there's units so that these people can have some dignity and a shower and electricity and not be living in the gazebo. And at the very least we need to provide lockers and you know we've gotta do something because it's getting out of hand and of course this is a national problem I'm aware of that You know we, I don't know the history. We have no mobile home parks in Ojai, you know and I'm sure there's, I don't know that the community wants mobile home parks, but it's a fact that people are Illegally living in trailers on the side and if neighbors don't complain I don't think these people should live in fear.

You know, I think while you went during the campaign you also mentioned at Oak Grove School loosening restrictions due to the emergency You know, we need a safe parking spot. We changed our signage so that people can no longer park during the night but then we forgot to do the other piece which is to provide a safe parking lot and I don't know how many... I mean if we have these community meetings maybe the people that are living in cars will come out of the woodwork and we can see just how many there are because I've seen them near You know, on dead-end streets near fields and even in the bank parking lot. I'm pretty sure when I go there early in the morning and there's a car there with the curtains kind of drawn, there's somebody sleeping in their car.

I would like to, you know this is kind of going back to the rent stabilization program. We still need up-to-date data on all the apartments, all the affordable apartments, I know for a fact are on the north side of Ojai Avenue. They're not in District 4 with the exception of Whispering Oaks. Anything that's kind of close to an apartment on that side is more live work and super expensive than I've seen, you know it's more yeah.

And then I want to and I think we should definitely bring in uh we need to have the El Roblar, the Ojai Valley Inn all the businesses where you know that support the town They need to be part of this conversation. We need to know where their workers are living, how many are commuting. We need like this huge fact gathering. Yeah you know we need current data because things have changed dramatically even in the last year at the beginning of 2022 I actually thought I could find housing. You know there was like little little glimmers of hope It's all gone. There is no hope. I can't emphasize that enough, okay? I've given up. I'm just gonna rent a room in District 4 and I'll keep looking but at least I'll have peace of mind that I'm in my district but let me tell you there is nothing.

When you give somebody a $5,000 relocation fee, you're basically sending them somewhere else to live with that $5 thousand dollars. I can't emphasize that enough Okay, if I'm wrong show me the data. You know, I go to Zillow every day out and you know within this I'm talking about the city limit there is housing In Miners Oaks and Oakview but that is going up by leaps and bounds, you know It's unbelievable how the housing you can see it increasing by the week so there we need to find out what we can legally do and what's To a national trend that has got to end. I know that at the federal level there are people that want to you know they want to grapple with this but we have to wait yeah.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:43:36

Okay, thank you. And I appreciate all the comments from my colleagues and clearly this is a huge issue here in Ojai and all over the country. And I love the fact that so many people wanna volunteer and jump in and help which is a beautiful thing. I just wanna point out we have five groups who are currently focused on housing in Ojai. We have the community development, our staff, hats off to staff and much gratitude for all the work you do We have the Planning Commission and they give direction to the City Council, so that's three.

We have our general plan process that's going on right now and we have consultants for that and we will have a joint meeting next Tuesday with the Planning Commission And then we have the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura. So that's five different groups that are focused on housing currently in Ojai. I don't think we need another committee, a sixth group.

I'm concerned about our staff, our super hardworking staff that is every time I come to City Hall I just see you scurrying around and working a lot of hours. So I think it's really... And the other thing is when volunteers are much more nimble in that you don't have to follow the process, you don't have to be a Brown Act group, you can meet whenever you want And advise counsel or the planning commission in many different ways. I do like the idea of the workshop if council is amenable to that, to bring in some innovation because as Councilmember Lange said there are lots of new ideas out there and I think everyone Looking outside the box in terms of what housing looks like and there's so many different groups with just really interesting ideas, so In terms of Moving forward.

It sounds like we have council majority interested in Starting with a workshop and bringing in perhaps the area housing authority of the county Ventura you know I think though that Next Tuesday is going to be really crucial when we meet with the Planning Commission and get feedback in that joint meeting, so I think that is going to be a really important moment. But once again, I don't think we should be using our staff time and finances, city finances, to make another group to advise us when we already have five different groups working on this.

Is there I Think at this point to to lead the discussion. Is there someone ready to make a motion that we could discuss?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:46:24

I'll make I'll make a motion that we that we Direct staff to Schedule a workshop That We come up with an agenda for that workshop that I'm not sure exactly what the agenda for the workshop is, but my interest would be in bringing in people including just the community with creative ideas about how to address affordable housing. How to raise money for affordable housing and how to allocate whatever funds are available to the most beneficial use with the least impact on our community.

Least impact, least negative impact on our community. Greatest positive impact on our community. Is there a second?

1:47 – 2:0436 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:47:39

And actually I would also suggest in that motion that we if we

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:47:41

can establish goals Through that meeting that we could then look at how to accomplish that, including potentially committees.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:06

Is there a second for that motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:10

So we have a motion and a second on the floor. I might be more inclined to support it

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:15

after discussion if you worded that this, you see this as

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:17

a first

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:48:17

step

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:30

And it doesn't preclude that, because other cities have affordable housing ad hoc committees. That's not uncommon. Santa Barbara has one. I mean it's very common and Mayor Betsy, your point about staff time. That was not a concern when you did rent stabilization. We're gonna hire someone for $150,000 which would build all kinds of housing for the homeless. Just

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:49:00

to clarify though that was done... Staff spent James few hours writing that but if that had been done by committee that would have taken many many hours correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:49:15

How

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:49:15

do

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:49:15

you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:49:16

answer that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:49:16

He's not even coming back for three months with the landlord

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:49:22

regulations. Maybe the way to answer that is I think that process, that item came back to Council quicker than it would have. I do not intend by my motion to preclude us deciding at a future point that the best way to move forward

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:49:39

is by the formation of a committee. I'm not convinced that that's right, but I think that that's always going to be a topic of debate. Whether it's part of what we do through that workshop or whether it's something that is put back on the agenda to discuss again. Just because an idea doesn't float The first time around doesn't mean that it's not going to float the second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:17

time. It took us three months to get this far, okay? This has been tossed around since the very first day that you were seated. We wanted to do this, it's now April 11th. So we need to make the most of this moment.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:50:35

Can I just interrupt? Yeah. What did happen was other items were prioritized and this was put on the back burner so perhaps we all need to agree that this is now our top priority Because that is what happened. Rent stabilization came up and the greenhouse gas reduction came up, and those things were prioritized. And there was no lag time between when they came back. They came back. The next council meeting and it was because they were prioritized. And other things were not, that being the ATP and that being this even though this was discussed on that first council meeting and we seem to have agreement. So I would say that perhaps we need to give direction to staff that this is actually a priority for us And that it remains a priority until we get it firmed up in a way that we think we can hand it off.

I see many, many, many loose ends like just the amount of questions that come up right now. You know, I'm thinking potentially we might need a facilitator to try to organize all of this, someone who knows and deals with housing in small communities. That would be an expert who could come in and actually maybe make this initial first list In other words, I don't know how this model is going to play out. But I don't see it firming up in this particular discussion.

I don' t know what the next steps would really be because we seem to have a lot floating in the ether And we haven't even talked about the things, Andy has mentioned what concerns him. But we as other council members have not given our list of the things that we would like to see or the things that we have been thinking about. Or even for instance, we have local talent help of Ojai could come in people who do alternative building could come in I mean, I don't know if you guys remember 20 years ago, you know the the unconference conference where people were able Experts came in and they would you know put up their topic and they were an expert in it And if you want to it was an unconference and if you wanted to go to that conference I mean that particular session you would do it right?

So we have a lot of people in town who also might have expertise my point being that I don't feel like we have made enough of an in road to know what our next steps are right now. And I would like to see, I would like as part of that motion to have something firmed up. I'm a little bit.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:53:43

Why don't we, my suggestion may be that I'm concerned about holding a workshop that's going to be, you know, a six or eight hour workshop and then of course let's say a six-hour workshop.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:59

We'll sit outside with the talking stick!

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:54:01

Okay well but yeah but you know maybe and I agree with Leslie And lightning won't strike me. That there are too many issues to talk about, to think that we can have a meeting and then it's all going to coalesce into some plan I think so that we don't Have a meeting and then it goes nowhere. Maybe we should ask staff to schedule I want to hear from you guys.

Should we schedule, you know two or three workshops? You know 30 days apart and and in you know encourage the public but what I don't want to get bogged down into a Into a you know, a series of meetings where it the purpose seems to be, you know Come and we're going to provide you with a house. The goal is for us To do what? We can do as a city council And it may not, what we can do may not look like what the public is going to hope which is that we can open up the city's coffers and build houses instead of paving roads.

So I'm you know, I'm sorry. I went off on a tangent but I would I am open to the idea to allay the concerns of Leslie and Sousa that we that this would be a meeting that would go to nowhere that we schedule more than one session about 30 days apart, and maybe even a third session if that's what you want. I'd agree to a third session." But I'd also then like to say, these are going to be a three-hour session and we figure out somewhere along the line how to manage public comment. But I think at least for the first couple of sessions, we should focus more on bringing in innovators to talk to us about How does a small community like ours with the challenges that we have address affordable housing in a sensible way?

That's my goal, because I don't believe that I have the answers. I believe that there are smarter people that are gonna have the answers. It's finding good solutions that we can actually

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:57:03

achieve. And specifically connected to our general plan which is

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.791:57:11

imminent. Yes, I agree with that 100%. Rachel?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:57:15

Yes, I think I agree with Councilmember Rule that having a facilitator or having experts would be really helpful at these workshops. So that way it can to Mayor Pro Tem's Francina's point so that we don't it's not a divisive process that we have two camps and arguing and using the workshop time in a really unproductive way So I think, and I also agree that we need this as a priority. This needs to be, I was the one who brought it up as an agenda item in the very first meeting. I think that we need this.

And so I'm also in support of Council Member Whitman's idea that we schedule this, that we make it a priority, that we get it on the agenda And I like the idea of having two separate workshops. That way it opens us up to having more community involvement if people, I love what the Green Coalition did with the World Cafe process and I'm not saying we have to use that process because I don't know if that's exactly what we need for this but having it facilitated, having it being led, having it be a community visioning, I think that would really energize people around an issue that is really divisive

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:58:39

All right we do have a motion and we have a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:42

question.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:58:42

Yep

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:44

when we do our joint meeting it's next Monday night with the planning commission. Can't we. Tuesday night Tuesday. Oh it's next Tuesday that's right. And then the following week is a Monday. Right. That

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:58:56

we're working on that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:57

and

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:58:57

so we have four council meetings come up

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:59

over the next three weeks. And that's a public meeting next Tuesday night, the 18th between this Ojai City Council and the Planning Commission during that meeting can we because I think if the Planning Commission Chair Quigley said that the Affordable Housing Committee was suspended at the moment And that could be an opportunity to discuss because none of this precludes if the whatever you know if they were working on something they could still continue working on that right. If council is open to that

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction1:59:40

It would be up to the council. So, the agenda for the general plan update is specifically focused on the general plan update. We have 86 slides that we have to get through so the agenda is limited to that. The council could decide to give direction for the planning commission To start the housing committee. I don't believe just For to be clear, I think that they had asked for it when this didn't come back to the council So I don't think it's ever been formed It hasn't done any work and so the answer was it's scheduled for Council. So wait until Council decides

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:00:17

So they didn't start and then there was a new council not to my understanding. No

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:00:25

Just a quick comment that we could also Certainly use, you know I'm not saying staff time but but you know our committees as resident experts I mean in fact they are so whether or not they participate as you know general public or whether they you know present. You know background there's I mean I know that the planning you know there are people on the planning commission who have been there for years and years and years and have a really deep knowledge around affordable housing maybe it's what You know, so that's also an option that our commissions are also very knowledgeable and experts as well as for instance I met with help of Ojai what they don't know is you know? Yeah. They know a lot yeah and around housing in Ojai and around housing in Ventura County So we should look for that as well.

I'm still a little bit unclear on what that first workshop actually looks like, but maybe that is to be developed, I'm not sure.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:01:35

Yeah, I think here's sort of... I was trying to write down some notes of maybe an approach we can take because I do hear consensus to have the workshop and then I think what I hear is from there it's to be determined what the next step is based on how the workshops go But so sort of the what we're starting to kick around and let me give a little bit of background to help explain it for the maybe for the public is City of Ojai doesn't have a housing department. And that's not unusual, not uncommon. The most cities in the county don't I think Oxnard and Ventura are the only two that do and they have budgets 20 times their size and that's why they can afford to have housing departments I think Oxnard's housing department on its own, its budget is bigger than, I think it's twice our city's budget.

So we don't have staff currently that just get to like focus on housing. It's just we don't have that luxury. So my thought would be, if we're going to do a workshop. We would solicit some experts, you know, whether we whatever we call them some experts who could come to the city. Do a few workshops maybe it would be something like the first conversation would be kind of, you know, And then at that point, you know either and the committee it could be something that.

Is one of those ideas or it could be that the expert recommends or doesn't recommend then taking those ideas to a committee. So this could all sort of tie in but I think that's how we would approach it and like I said, I just wanted to give the background of like the reason why we don't have a staff person who we can just assign this to but I think that there are some positives to that of having somebody come in and looking with fresh eyes and not coming in with preconceived notions So that's sort of what I think could work and for the purposes of tonight if the council agrees to you know, I think the motion would allow us to do that. And then I'd probably have an item come back on a consent agenda to just with the credentials of the person we're looking at and approving the person that we're going to use for that in the council approving a little bit of money for that which I wouldn't expect to be very much so

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:04 – 2:0921 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:04:02

Yeah,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:04:04

if I could two further suggestions one would be we heard a couple of concrete ideas A number of concrete ideas tonight that that expert could look at. I would suggest that the council could either now or perhaps by email later to James and I Raise additional ideas that are like hey I want this looked at and then we could give that list to the expert and staff on our end And we could give you know, I'm envisioning a Bullets,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:04:31

yeah

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:04:32

vacancy tax legal if a voter approved things like that We give a little bit of information to seed the process and use that in an upfront staff report That would go for that first workshop. So we could start the night or the day probably with a Little information in upfront in writing that's clear on some options that were raised by the council not to be an exclusive list but just the initial list and A quick assessment of what is you know?

And I think it would be helpful if we could have a discussion about how to do

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:05:02

that.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:05:15

I just like to hear the ideas before I hear people talk. And that's, I think what the suggestion of a written staff report that has sort of a litany of ideas that have been raised and a little bit about them starts the conversation on a substantive level from the written information up front. The other key to remember with this special meeting is that the public comment is just on the items on the agenda so it would just be a workshop comment unless the council of course wanted to

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:05:57

expand. Can I just remind council to bring it through the chair and no cross talk? Do you want to finish, Andy?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:06:06

Well I'll just amend my motion to say that we do what they just said. And

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:06:20

there's an organization, a non-profit called Dignity Moves, Matt, that I'd like to add to that list. They just did a project on State Street, really interesting innovative group

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:06:31

Great. That's great, yeah. So

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:06:34

perhaps we could also have a list of potential organizations that we consider to be experts or particularly innovative experts so that might be as well as topics organizations that potentially we could research and I'm assuming that and this was really my question that a Google Doc is not is a Brown Act

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:06:59

violation. Yeah, I realize that it makes life very difficult but Google Docs don't work unfortunately. The legislature has not joined the 21st century.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:07:11

All right, well we have a motion and we have a second.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:07:15

Given what's on the calendar I mean I envision this happening because we have to go through that housing element in general plan material and that's like important to our governance ability that there should be something that would take place in somewhere between 60 and 90 days as opposed to in the next 30 days or

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:07:41

Yeah, the one point I wouldn't make to that because I know that sounds long but over the next 30 days we have Including tonight a total of four council meetings. We'll have to do so the next thirty days are pretty spoken for

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:07:54

Quick comment if I could I would say also that going through the General plan and the housing element would be very good background information for all of us so that we can start to figure out how things Do indeed fit in there? So it could be it's like a pre-session

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:14

After we if we're ready to go through this motion James, if I have another motion or city attorney A separate motion from this can I I can still do that? Or how does that work

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:08:29

as long as it's related at the affordable housing advisory committee topic then yeah you could make an additional motion and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:35

But after we do this motion, it's not a substitute motion.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:08:40

Yeah if it's a different motion on the same topic that would be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:42

okay. My other question is James can you still somehow incorporate identifying all the city properties and a list of the projects That are in the works and include, for example, Nick outweighs the possible housing overlay with property in front of Westridge.

2:09 – 2:1420 turns

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:09:12

And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:09:15

Yeah, any other project the one There's been so many projects in front of the Planning Commission that seems to have just they just die in the bowling alley people constantly and then You know, are there any possibility and city properties the property next to the Becker Mallory Way that piece of property? I think we should put the homeless there.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:09:43

Could you just James estimate how much time that will take in terms of staff?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:09:49

Yeah, we've put together a list of properties. I think the honest answer is there's not what people think there is and so whenever we put the list together everybody looks and goes like this is it? What about all the vacant properties? So we have that list and we can put that together going back in getting the list of projects over the last five to ten years That's gonna take some time And I would say one of the issues or where I'm trying to think is The property we control is easy enough, but like the bowling alley it's a private property owner and we can't force them to do something. So I guess to me my instinct would be to focus on the projects that we have control over this that the city has

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:10:35

control over. The other thing if i could jump in with suggestion the housing element already has an analysis of most of the Sites in the city that would be suitable for housing at this scale.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:47

Yeah,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:10:48

so I think that analysis to a certain extent already exists And maybe we start with making sure that everyone has that top of mind I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:56

don't know if it's looked at every square inch but it's a star Just what you think is relevant Okay You know, I just need some overview and I have a sense of it. Okay. And all you have to do is put the word bowling alley with a question mark, you know something like that so that we have a... It's on our radar.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:11:23

Yeah in my understanding not to digress but I think that they're proposing doing a restaurant now and are sort of moving forward with that That's an example, just as an example of our limited control over some of that private property. But we can provide some of that basic information.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:11:43

Okay, all right. I hate to add to your already expanding list but I don't necessarily want to have a detailed list of new housing laws but James we talked about very briefly the housing law and I'm trying to find which AB it is. But basically it allows for affordable housing, it allows the city to designate At risk long term residents for priority on affordable housing. And as soon as I figure, as soon as I find that number here in this morass, I will send that to you but I do need the council to agree to have James do a little bit of research on that and tell us how it might affect us because it's relatively new. It was September of 2022 So I don't even know if it's been implemented, but as I understand it, it allows for affordable housing the city to make the rules allowing priority at risk residents first priority on that.

And I think that that's something that we're all hugely concerned about and I need someone to look at that and make sure I'm not reading it you know as someone who wishes it were that Yeah,

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:13:07

I think simple answer. I think at this point for the ideas is I would say so we can't do a Google Doc but you can email me. Okay, so I think if the council everybody if you think of something Send it to us and then that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:13:24

one

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:13:25

I'll

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:13:25

jump down And then and I would assume that has to be part of the discussion of the housing element

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:13:33

And I would just jump in as well very briefly. I forget the bill number as well, somewhere on the list. But as I understand it that bill applies to de-districted affordable housing of which the city doesn't currently have any except for Whispering Oaks. Exactly. But if we were to do a new project or if the project on the ballot is approved by the voters then that could be implemented but we can get a...I think we already wrote a memo on it. If not I'll find it.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:14:00

Okay thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:14:00

you yes

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:14:01

thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:14:01

you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:14:02

All right, well we have a motion and we have a second. Can we have the roll call? Yes

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion and we have a second. Can we have the roll call? Yes Mayor, roll call.
Show transcript
Mayor, roll call. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Lange? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes Council Member Ruhle? Yes Mayor Stixx? Yes

2:14 – 2:3313 turns

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.752:14:16

Motion passes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:14:17

Okay great so that's 5-0 to have some housing workshops in the next how many days 60 days okay all right oh yes okay go ahead

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:30

I want to take another moment to talk about the Planning Commission, the possibility that they wanted to do an affordable housing ad hoc committee. Is that the proper term? They would select two of their five. Well, I would make a motion that if they want to do that It doesn't preclude what we've discussed and it seems like if they want to do it, we don't have to take their advice. But I would like to see what they come up with and they can also not do it. We're not ordering them to do it my motion would be if they want to do Or if they feel that it's a duplication of what we're doing. They can use their judgment.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:15:18

The motion would be allow the Planning Commission to create some sort of ad hoc housing committee if they choose

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:24

to. Affordable

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:15:25

housing, yeah. If they choose. So the council has the ability to do that if desired?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:15:32

Okay, is there a second for that motion?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:15:34

I would second it if we could just qualify that no staff time is used. Yes. That's fine. Yeah, all

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:15:42

right. I appreciate that. I wouldn't normally ask for that but I think we will be spending our time on this so it's sort of like if they want to do it they'll have to know that they're doing it without staff support.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:15:53

Yeah, I really appreciate that too because I think we sometimes don't notice when we keep saying Could you do that? So let's really be conscious of that. All right, we have a motion and a second. Could we have the roll call please?

Roll-call vote Passed 3–2 motion and a second. Could we have the roll call
Show transcript
Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes Council Member Lange? Yes Council Member Whitman? No Mayor Stixx? No Councilmember Wolk? Yes.

Motion passes. All right, three to two to create an ad hoc committee on the Planning Commission to look at housing. If they choose. If they choose. Okay let's take a short break and we will be back thank you. Council members we come back please. Thank you All right, we are back and

we'll move on to item number three. Introduction of an ordinance amending Ojai Municipal Code Title IX, adopting the Building Appeals Board recommendations for additional amendments to the 2022 California building code. Is there a staff report James?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:27:28

Yes thank you. This may look familiar. We've adopted building code updates a few times over the last couple years and just as basic background, the state puts out updated building code every three years and every three years the city if we want to keep all of our building code requirements that are above the minimum, we have to readopt them So we've done that several times because the city of Ojai has adopted fire hardening requirements that are above the state minimum.

And so at one of our first meetings, I think in December or January, what we called a holdover ordinance that adopted the new California building codes, but also kept our prior code amendments regarding fire hardening. And so at that time we noted that the ordinance was still going to go through review with the Building Appeals Board and so the ordinance has gone through that review And the Building Appeals Board recommended adopting a couple of additional code amendments. And so those are included in the proposed ordinance.

The big one, kind of the major change is a requirement that when a building permit is issued for an alteration addition or repair that is higher than $25,000 A requirement would be in place that would require that person to also do fire hardening improvements. At about a recommended 20% of the valuation, and we give an example in the staff report For example, if a property owner wants to remodel 400 square feet of their house and the project would be $33,000 that would exceed $25,000. So the applicant would then need to show that $6,000 would be spent on fire hardening And we have a list of potential improvements such as a spark arrestor on chimneys, vent opening coverings, garage door gap fillers and roof gutter blockers to stop leaves from accumulating in gutters.

And then there's some other ones as well, but the so the recommendation is adding that additional requirement The reason for that requirement we've talked about this over the years was that If we don't have some sort of retrofit requirement We have such few new buildings built that the fire hardening improvements aren't making maybe the impact that we had hoped because it's only, most of the building code fire hardening amendments that we've adopted over the years apply to new construction. And in a city like Ojai where there's not much new construction but there's a lot of remodeling and a lot of retrofits That doesn't make maybe the impact that we had hoped it would.

And so one of the ideas behind this recommendation is this would actually start fire hardening existing buildings, so a 50-year old building that was not built to modern fire standards if they come in and let's say they were coming into to do, it's a house and they wanna do a kitchen remodel that's $40,000. They would have to do some fire hardening improvements to start trying to make that impact of fire hardening our aging housing stock.

So that was reviewed by the BAB and on their, I think it was their November 9th meeting they recommended adopting it. We had scheduled this discussion for a couple months back and then we had a long meeting so it got bumped back We have the current ordinance. The current ordinance is in place with fire hardening improvements, this is just to consider that additional recommendation for the 20% fire hardening requirement.

There is a, we note in the report that there's a second recommendation that the BAB made which was to reduce the standard for solar tubes, skylights and very high fire zones We've reviewed, there's always a general rule that cities can be more restrictive than state minimums but not less restrictive. We analyzed that recommendation and we don't believe it can be done because we believe it would be considered less restrictive than the state requirement for the very high fire zones.

So we don't recommend that modification, and that modification is not included in the ordinance. But again, that 20% additional valuation requirement is included. And I think something said in the last item, a comment was made of asking for the pros and cons. The pros and cons of this modification are pretty clear. Pro, we finally fire hardened old buildings that need to be fire hardened. Cons, it costs money and we potentially make repairs more expensive. If somebody plans to do a $30,000 project, it's now another 20%. It's a $36,000 project. So those are the pros and cons I think you know the logic with I'm going to go ahead and open it up for questions.

And it shouldn't impact just people trying to do simple repairs and things like that. So, so that's sort of the analysis as I said the building appeals board did recommend adopting that there's an ordinance proposed in the packet to adopt that requirement and maintain the rest of the building code updates in the rest of the fire hardening improvements. And if there's we're happy to answer any questions.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:33 – 2:4329 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:33:52

Thank you James any questions from council?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:33:56

No? Okay. Just a clarifying question, I guess how do you decide on an amount of money versus things to do kind of? Not that I have any, just curious.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:34:19

Yeah, I think the thought was making it a certain percentage of the repair would be more consistent and depending on the size of the repair and depending on you know size of the house and everything else if it's 20% then they'll be doing everybody's consistently doing 20% of the value towards fire hardening versus if we said something like, I think if I'm understanding standing. If we said something like you have to install a spark arrestor on your chimney if he did this that you know if the repairs $25,000 or $200,000 they're doing the same amount of work versus a percentage of the repair

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:35:05

Okay, thank you any other questions okay So

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:35:17

Did we have the fire department get involved with coming up with these recommendations or is this just strictly from? This

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:35:28

is from the building appeals board and our building official were involved in that process. Our building officials are present We did, I believe we had asked the fire department and Tom might remember this better than I. And the fire department was actually had, you may remember that email exchange but I thought they had actually said that they had mistakenly thought that this requirement had gone in statewide but it hadn't. But maybe you can speak to that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:36:00

Yeah, this is a requirement of Ventura County now. So the fire department thought it was part of the building code originally but it was just like we're doing put it in as an amendment to the building code

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:36:19

So the county has adopted essentially what we're being asked to adopt?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:36:24

Something similar. Similar. I used some of their language as a base of what we were proposing.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:36:32

I think they had adopted a different percentage, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:36:35

thought was what I would say. They did it at different... They did it a different way, a different valuing. But it goes towards more of a monetary thing and we didn't feel that it fit here because they were saying you had to do all of this no matter the cost. And that's what I remember of it, it's been a while since I read it but that was my understanding James if you remember correctly.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:37:10

Yeah and so to get back to the original question, when we had talked about adopting this we did send it to the fire department for feedback and their response was basically I thought we already did that. So it does not seem like they had concerns about it

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:37:28

Okay, so another question is If a homeowner took the recommendations that were going around you know after the Thomas fire of ways to fire harden on your own and they You know spent a couple of thousand dollars doing fire safe things And then it takes them four or five years and they say well I'm gonna build You know, I'm gonna make this improvement do they get to go back to the fire hardening that they did and Include that as part of their you know the amount that they have to I mean if it doesn't I think it should because I because I think we want at all times to encourage people to Do things now and not wait until they have a construction project. Yeah,

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:38:26

so we didn't account for that I Could I think we could add language saying something like we'd count improvements from the last five years if they provided proof

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:38:36

yeah The council could the Babs recommendation does not include credit for the past The council very much could add a credit for the past. I think it'd be something like a fire hardening improvements As reviewed and approved as acceptable by the building official within the last, you know five years is a good metric would qualify something like that could count as an evaluation.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:38:58

Would it? I'm sorry Lucas wants to The one thing about the way

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:39:01

the building code currently is

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:39:02

is It

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:39:02

only has

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:39:02

to comply if it's touched So if the work is being done on an addition, then only the addition has to comply. So if you did a, let's say you converted your garage to an ADU. So then all of your windows in there that you're replacing and adding and, uh, your doors, they all have to comply with the high fire standards. Uh, if you're replacing the roof, that's going to comply.

The other part are, there are exceptions to this, um, ruling this ordinance and those would be if you are solely doing fire hardening upgrades which would include a re-roof, changing windows out because your windows have to be either tempered or some other way to fire harden. That is 100% a fire hardening Project so we're not going to penalize you there saying okay. You you're changing out your windows Now go and do these six things, too That's kind of another aspect of this but also if you're changing out your Your mechanical system, that doesn't apply. If you're doing a panel upgrade and rewiring your entire house, that doesn't apply here. So if it's strictly plumbing, mechanical and electrical, that doesn' t apply. It's only towards building permits.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:40:50

Thank you. Rachel? Go ahead.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:40:54

Well I had a question. Is there a way that you know, so many people in our community are making environmental upgrades moving to electric like a lot of the projects that I'm hearing about have to do with climate remediation and And so is there a possibility or could we look at adding an exception, almost like as a maybe reducing the amount of fire hardening percentage if someone is doing something that is climate forward.

And because that would essentially be helping the whole community.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:41:38

So adding that as one of the, we have four exceptions listed so adding a fifth exception for projects that have positive climate benefits or something like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:41:52

Those are already exempt because that would be an electrical permit only, not a building permit. So those would be exempt from the process. If they're eliminating gas out of their house, that's a plumbing and an electrical permit. Those don't apply to this ordinance. I think there is

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:42:11

potentially other... There are certain kinds of windows that are more environmentally friendly Also, just other kinds of there are other kinds of improvements that people could be making for in addition to electrical

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:42:30

like the energy-efficient roof tiles for example That'd be something that would normally be building. Yeah So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:42:39

as long as they're class a as long as their class as long as they're class a and that would still comply with rule number one

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:42:46

They can go from class A to energy-efficient class A, for example. And the thought would be I think the thought is then adding an exemption so that if somebody's making a improvement that doesn't fire harden but improves or helps with the climate, that they're not then penalized for that. I

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:04

have a question. And let's take turns Council, make sure everybody gets a turn. Is this pretty standard Tom across the state in high fire regions?

2:43 – 2:5124 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:43:18

No.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:18

No, but the county is doing it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:43:21

The county put it in their code this year.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:24

Okay. Are you hearing that other counties are doing it also?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:43:29

I haven't heard that there are many doing it. I haven't looked to see if any others were doing it. It's just been a concern of the past council and the BAB in the past We're not doing anything to retrofit the existing structure. It's just too little, it's almost too little too late.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:55

No it's a huge concern clearly. Okay let's take I think it's Leslie and then Andy?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:44:01

My question was answered thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:44:03

Andy do you have a question?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:44:05

So if you had to build a pergola in order to have solar panels Would that be exempt? I mean, I'd hope the pergola would be less than $25,000 but it would depend on who your builder was probably.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:44:31

And if you imagine there's footings and grading that can add up fast they can all differ to Tom

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:44:36

It would just be based off of valuation and Valuation is calculated off of our ICC table that's adopted through our fee schedule. Yeah, and We just calculate the valuation And based on that valuation That's where that number comes from we don't take The customers valuation so it might cost them more than what our valuation is and more likely it will because The way the way evaluation works is is it's an average and And so across the entire United States, and it doesn't take into account the levels of The degree of the make of it, so if you have a Viking stove versus a GE stove. It doesn't take into account it's a stove. They have a set price for that. So that's why I'm saying construction cost is generally higher than the valuation. It's an estimate of an average.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:45:50

I think to maybe just to add on, to the concern that was spoken about whether it makes sense to add an exception for projects that are intended to benefit the environment. I think that's an example of a project that without that language could have to meet the requirement That's my concern. Yeah, but if you add that language then and we'd add it in a way where it's projects that are being built solely for those environmental impacts and in that case a pergola to support solar panels would meet that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:46:34

criteria. And then what credit would you get? for the fact that what you're building is getting, if you're involved in a bigger project would you get credit for the fact that you're spending that money? I mean we could almost have this Yeah, I

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:47:03

think the simplest way would just not apply the additional requirement to those projects.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:47:12

And if it's included as part of a bigger project like that pergola is included as part of the bigger project then that valuation wouldn't be added into the total valuation for retrofitting?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:47:28

So for example, if somebody's doing an addition to their house and a pergola with solar panels we'd be able to just apply this valuation towards the addition not to the pergola supporting the solar panels.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:47:42

Okay so I have one last question if that's okay? And that is that there is language in the ordinance about the very high fire severity zone. And I may have missed something, but I have a recollection that we had an ordinance come before us to create a high-severity zone. Was it citywide? That was discussed at one point. And then it was rejected and I'm just, so I was surprised to see the high severity zone. It sounds like the National Forest is the high severity zone or is there part of the city within the city limits that is part of that high severity zone?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:48:46

So the language in the ordinance is basically it's justifying why we are taking this action. And one of the reasons we give is that we're surrounded by the National Forest, which is a very high fire hazard zone. So that's what that is intended to refer to, We've seen reflected in reality with the Thomas fire. That's what happened is, you know, the forest around us burnt.

So that's reflected in here. The city does have a couple of areas that are very high fire hazard zones but not the entire city yet, because CAL FIRE keeps updating the maps. So the city does have a couple portions. The intent of the ordinance is to apply city-wide if you're doing a project. If you have a house on Park Road it would apply. If you have a house on Foothill it would apply. If you have a house in the Arbolada it would apply, the city portion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:49:45

James, can I just clarify one thing? Sure. So we actually our high fire standards are applied throughout the city right as part of our ordinance that we previously adopted We added all fire severity zones that Cal Fire has and so therefore it applies to all of those zones and then this references back To that amendment. So that's how we're applying it across the city instead of changing the map, which would be very very very costly and getting that to Be approved by Cal fire It was an easier way to get the same thing by applying it to all fire severity zones, if that makes sense.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.792:50:45

Okay so I lied, I have another question. So if I build a swimming pool And that would almost certainly exceed the $25,000 threshold. Would I then be required to do fire hardening to my home? Yes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:51:16

Yes, sorry yes based off the valuation

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:51:20

Yeah, it's not a fire hardening improvement. Not a climate improvement so you'd have to plan to pay 20%.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:51:27

And it's a structure.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:51:30

Okay, Sousa do you have a question?

2:51 – 3:0025 turns

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated2:51:36

Microphone please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:40

This ordinance applies, don't spill my coffee, to single family homes Correct, but not two apartments?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:51:52

No the ordinance effectively applies to all buildings in the city.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:55

All buildings in the city

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:51:57

Commercial

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:51:57

residential,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:51:58

etc.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:59

And the same in any new buildings Automatically have are required to have whether their apartment Single-family they all will require to have yes Fire hardening standard

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:52:14

and the idea is the new buildings are built to that standard and we've taken care of that We've adopted those requirements over the years. And so this is intended to apply to the We're going to be looking at a number of things.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:40

A landlord in last Friday's Ojai Valley News and his inch after the article was published he was talking about his expenses and the problems he had with tenants. Kimberly Rivers wrote a little paragraph online, his insurance that day Before she published the article went up from 7,000 to 30,000. So you're going to be seeing these people coming to the staff for an exemption to the 4% stabilization correct?

I mean that's a lot of... Is that happening all over the city?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:53:17

We have not heard about that happening. The only thing I've heard personally here at the front counter is we had a couple people who came in who it's actually kind of a looming tree issue we have is that insurance companies are Starting to I guess try to force people to cut down trees that hang over Structures and so we met with some people with the Ojai trees and some other people to try to start thinking of strategies for that But so we heard that and that they're being threatened with insurance cancellation in those types of things, but I haven't heard about this particular issue

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:53:56

It's a dilemma because that's the shade that saves on energy. Yeah, it is a dilemma that we have to sort out.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:54:05

Any final questions

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:54:06

before we move onto public comment? I just want to recap. So essentially Ventura County has already done this and so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:54:20

They've adopted something similar

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:54:22

they've adopted something similar so similar qualitatively in the same ballpark. And we are talking about severe fire hazard because we're surrounded by severe fire hazard at at its writ large basically the woods. Okay thank you okay

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:54:42

I mean can we move on to public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:54:50

First we have

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction2:54:52

Wayne Maynard then Stuart Griffith and then Heidi Whitman.

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated2:55:07

Good evening, Wayne Maynard. And I emailed a 10-page document earlier today. I don't know if you got it or not but... So I'm just going to highlight some of those things and I'll be available here for any questions. My name is Wayne Maynard. I'm resident of the city. I am retired fire captain from the Ventura County Fire District. A large portion my career was in the development worked on the development of building and fire codes and standards at national state and local levels Currently on the board of directors for the Ojai Valley Fire Safety Council.

And I consider myself a fire safety advocate and I truly support the concept of this meeting. This ordinance, but it pained me greatly when I had to check the box on the speaker card that I oppose right now because it's not ready for prime time my opinion you guys have a lot of questions and I have a lot of issues. I think I can help address as well and My recommendation is to not forward this too at the time at this time until we can get things fixed so that We don't have to deal with a bunch of amendments and such during the public hearing portion of the adoption a month from now.

There are several comments that the staff made that I don't agree with their opinions, and I'd like to talk to them about it sometime if they're interested. I gave you a map that shows the very high fire hazard severity sums that is defined or determined by CAL FIRE for our local area. And as far as I can tell, that's the only designated fire hazard area that we have is those very high fire hazards.

They are in the process of updating the maps but that may not happen for a year or two. The county of Ventura in their ordinance, and I gave you examples of that, has a provision that rather than going by the map, you do a case-by-case basis by having the definition of a hazardous fire area that looks at where the property sits when it's being developed. And the county building ordinance specifically delegates that to the fire department. They go out and make a recommendation, and they'll let the building department know if it's in a high-fire hazard area or not.

I also do not agree that this retrofit ordinance as written is going to apply throughout the city. There's and you're not going to see that by looking at the proposed ordinance because That provision is in a section. That's not in your as part of the proposed ordinance But it's already part of the city building code that defines that these regulations only apply to designated fire hazard severity zones so until the rest of the city becomes designated by a Cal Fire or you as a city Create your own which you're allowed to do that says there's other these other portions of the city are high fire hazard areas and have to comply so Several things I don't think it's right for prime time. I think Thank you for your comment much

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:58:11

appreciated Because of flying ember cast And embers travel very far. I mean isn't the whole town though Event essentially at a high fire risk because of

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated2:58:32

that. Okay? Yeah, absolutely Ember cast is a big thing but when you're looking at providing the protection an example does it is it necessary to Double pane your windows to protect your structure downtown from an ember cast, not really. That's a waste in my opinion okay? You need to look at what causes the conflagration and you have a wind-driven event and if a fire gets started then it goes from structure to structure and so what you want to try to do is avoid getting the structure I'm going Their neighbors' house catches on fire because they're being fire-hardened to protect from the wildfire exposure, which is a rather quick fasting fire versus structure fire 10 feet away that burns for an hour.

Probably going to catch your house on fire too no matter what you do so it's a big community Commitment to try to get our community fire safe. I also wanted to just mention that there are voluntary programs for fire hardening, Fire Safe Council has a grant through CAL FIRE to educate and evaluate and make recommendations to people that want to voluntarily fire harden their homes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:00:02

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:00:05

Did you finish your points do you need another half minute or something? Because I would ask counsel if they'd like

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated3:00:14

I Put them in writing and if You know, I think that a little bit too fast. I think we need to get a lot of the issues that you guys have brought up on your own So I'm going to ask a question.

3:00 – 3:068 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:00:42

You said you're it pains you that you're not recommending this and I understand why you're saying that but in a Can can you encapsulate what you would like us to do? Instead of what's being presented to

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated3:00:59

us. I would recommend that at this meeting you send it back to staff to Correct some of the or identified the issues that you brought up Issues that I brought up and come up with some revised ordinance that we can present At a future time to say this is the one that's ready to go Okay,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:01:18

thank you All right next we have Stuart Griffith Thank You Wayne and Heidi Whitman

CommentStuart GriffithProposedself-stated3:01:25

Hello, I'm Stuart Griffith. Been a resident of Ojai for 35 years. I own a home on Shady Lane. I'm also an insurance agent. I've worked with commercial customers from Paso Robles to Bakersfield to Hollywood. I play a little bit of the devil's advocate on this. No home or business has burned in the city of Ojai since 1947. Wouldn't that make it questionable as to whether this is necessary? Ojai is already super resilient, we are nearly surrounded by orchards that are kept green and fire retardant. We have more and more buildings being built on county properties surrounding Ojai that are being protected and creating additional defensible space. If we have to see them on our hillsides why not recognize the benefit of their defensible space? We have fuel breaks running the entire length of the northern part of the valley.

They were, they have been inactive for many years but Newsom has recently signed a law to enable prescribed burns. Shouldn't the city work with the Forest Service to actively encourage prescribed burns on the fuel breaks before forcing property owners to incur some kind of arbitrary cost over and above what they are already incurring to improve their homes?

If you do this, at least only do it for the very high hazard areas of the map. There are big differences between a house on Lower Drown compared to one on Upper Mercer. The high hazard areas are the ones immediately around like Shelf Road and the top of the Arbolada. Why a set 20% over project amount? What is current building code relative to fire hardening? Why not just have houses brought up to code to a maximum requirement of 20% in the very high fire zones if they are not up to a minimum code. If a house already has asphalt shingles, has stucco or some other fire-resistant siding, has no chimney, no garage or the garage is already weatherstripped and it has one eighth inch or less screens in the soffit vents why not just consider them compliant and not have them incur extra costs.

This ordinance adds 20% to a project For businesses that would be starting, they may have to also incur changing electric appliances, water heaters and air units to natural gas, estimated at $30,000 possibly. And businesses also have to pay an extra 2% over the cost of renovations for artwork. So it's layer upon layer of additional costs over and above the necessary costs of renovations. This isn't Paradise, California's Mayor Sticks competitor in the mayor's race tried to portray when he brought in Ron Howard and we were lectured for an hour about how we're all going to go up in flames if we don't make this an emergency priority immediately. We are not on top of a mountain surrounded by miles of pine forest as mentioned before. We're in defensible space at the bottom of the mountains not at the apex.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:04:15

Thank You Stuart Next we have Heidi Whitman

CommentHeidi WhitmanProposedself-stated3:04:23

Hi Mayor Sticks, members of the council and staff. My name is Heidi Whitman and I've lived in the city for about 30 something years. I am speaking tonight because I actually took it to heart when I received the fire department's recommendations last spring to do the things that they and the Fire Safe Council told us that we should be doing to fire harden That included adding a five foot gravel ribbon of all around her house and we have a really old house. So I was very concerned during the Thomas fire that our house would go up, and also screening openings for embers so I recently I went through the process it took a year to build a pergola to put solar panels on. And I just today got my sign off on that, every bid that I got for solar was at least $25,000 and that didn't include my pergola so I would just like to see more exemptions as Councilwoman Lange mentioned for projects that don't really affect...

To me, I thought it was a benefit and I feel like I took a lot of the actions that were recommended I just did it myself. So maybe we need more outreach from The fire department, I'd like to see them comment on the on these regulations as well I feel like the fact that they're not here suggests that maybe they don't agree and I just think there's more we could do with public Outreach to see if we could get people to do it voluntarily

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:05:55

Thank You Heidi any comments online Weston

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.753:06:00

Yes, Mayor. We have one Rosalie Zabia. Rosalie you have the floor.

3:06 – 3:1310 turns

CommentRosalie ZabiaProposed3:06:08

Thanks Weston good evening council members and staff this proposal singles out a small group of homeowners imposes a tax upon them for wanting to improve their homes and then pretends there is some benefit to the homeowner and the public for doing so fire hardening a community's housing stock is only effective when embraced by the whole community A fire-hardened house in the middle of a burning neighborhood will likely burn, too.

The pain this measure will cause to the few homeowners who continue to pursue permits will not result in any appreciable public good. Everyone needs to embrace fire hardening for it to be effective. Second, the state already has strictest building codes and we've already heard that Ojai tops that. Ojai already has a problem with people doing work without permits because it is so expensive to do anything. Imposing any extra fees will ensure non-permitted work grows exponentially.

Third, the timing of this proposal is ironic given the council's recent allocation of $2 million to ATP. If this issue was so important, the city should be offering incentives, subsidies and education to get the whole community on board with fire hardening but instead is saying Let us stick our hand in your pocket and make you pay for fire hardening, rather than take responsibility for what we should be doing as a city.

What is the logic of this proposal? Is the assumption that people who remodel are rich and can afford a 20% or any surcharge? I would like to remind the BAB and the City Council that most of the property owners in this town bought their houses as middle-class people buying middle class houses Now, if those same people want to repair a moldy bathroom they've been living with for 10 years or fix up a garage to house a disabled adult child, they not only have to address soaring building costs but the city is going to impose a tax on their project and tell them what to do with the money? That's really unacceptable.

Specifically regarding ADU construction I exchanged emails with Mike Van Gorder of the Department of Housing and Community Development who said quote Government code section 65852.2 subdivision F3 exempts ADUs under 750 square feet from impact fees and requires that larger units be charged based on a proportionality with the primary unit." And he further said, Ohai's proposed fees do sound suspicious and I'd like to discuss this further with my team.

Instead of proposing a fire hardening tax on a few people, which is neither fair nor effective. I'm asking the city council to lead with support not punishment with an overburdened staff and steeply declining reserves that may not be possible. But at the very least, ask that you don't foist your responsibilities onto the homeowners of this community. Thanks so much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:09:05

Thank you, Rosalie. That's

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.753:09:07

all Mayor.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:09:07

Okay, alright let's move on to discussion. Rachel?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:09:12

Well I think you all know that I am deeply concerned about fire in our community But I had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Maynard when I was campaigning, he came over to me at Ojai Day and I know he's a real expert in this field. And so I am inclined to think that there's a different approach that we could take to fire hardening, like Rosalie said, that doesn't put a burden on many of our residents. One of the members of my district, one of our neighbors had an oak tree fall from a neighbor's yard onto her house.

And when I went over to see how things were going and talked to her, I said what can we do? She said the one thing you can do is that you can make it easier for residents who have old homes To make the repairs that they want to make and to do the things. One of the things that she was saying is that people aren't trimming their trees because they need to go through arborists, and a lot of older residents can afford that. And so I'm not really Inclined to pass an ordinance that would put additional cost burden on people who want to make changes to their homes Especially because we are talking about older homes. I think there's a more creative solution We can have two heart to fire hardening That wouldn't you know, that wouldn't cost 20% is a lot that six thousand six thousand dollars was and when I saw that it's like People who are renovating their homes.

I mean We're looking at kitchen remodeling to move everything to electric And that's thinking about adding another $6,000. That's a lot of money. It's substantial. I think there could be more creative ways to approach this. OK. I agree.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:14

Do you want to comment? Wait. One at a time please. Susa, do you want to comment or no? No. I just agree with Rachel. Leslie and then Andy? I'll agree

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:11:23

with Rachel as well.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:24

OK, Andy?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:11:26

Yeah, I agree as well. I do like the idea that we would look at some of the simplest affordable things that homeowners can do and put more effort into one getting them to do it voluntarily And then maybe, I'm not completely against the concept that we're looking at tonight. If it were just those smaller common sense things to impose on people as opposed to you know, it does seem like a big imposition and maybe out of proportion to the risk

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:12:19

Well, yeah. And I sounds like we have an agreement here and I appreciate your comment Councilmember Lang and thank you Wayne for showing up. I've met with Wayne a couple of times and I really appreciate your expertise and The whole idea, I mean what would happen in an ember cast? Every house has to be hardened because if your neighbor's house is not hardened it doesn't matter what you do. Is that correct Wayne pretty much?

We've talked a few times about this so So and back to Rosalie's comment about having some incentives and subsidies because really it all comes down to personal responsibility. We are all responsible for our own property, and Wayne I've had someone from the county come up and tell me what to do. The challenge is finding people who know how to do that because I've talked to many people, contractors People working construction and it's new information to them. So back to education, you know what is it? I mean we all need 1 8th of an inch screen or 16th of an inch in screen And I mean just simple things like that would make a huge difference and then of course the tree trimming It's huge And really I mean just the whole idea is seal up your house as much as possible so nothing can get inside I

3:13 – 3:1926 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:13:41

Would just make it this is more common than anything that I think we do need education and I think we can start with the basics and Really work on you know asking people to take responsibility as Thank you. I'm going to go back to Heidi Whitman and the women's apparently have done I need to do it for goodness sakes- But we had. We had the insurance people say.

You know this pine tree has to be cut off of your roof which essentially would decimate the pine tree. You know, so I live in limbo with that right now just as an FYI.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:14:22

One more thing and I'd just like to put a little plug for our disaster plan that we worked so hard on last year that James I can see is isn't that on right there? Is that it? And so part of that plan, yeah. Part of that plan is to hold some workshops and yeah, very nice. It's beautiful. Is to educate people on... That is our next step is to hold some workshops to explain, to teach people what it does mean to fire harden and the top three or four things that we can all do that aren't that actually expensive.

Rachel?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:14:57

I was actually just going to make a motion that we have staff come back with recommendations on, you know my marketing brain is going wild. I'm like brochures and community action but that we have staff come back with recommendations on an education Campaign Specifically around fire hardening and what residents can do And I would also like one one thing that I've been you know thinking about too as a part of that is actually having Like an or an organized effort for there to be neighborhood captains And so if we could look at what is the feasibility like volunteer neighborhood captain's who would be Contact people

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:15:54

Just a that's a great idea and we are Ideally bringing back cert in the neighborhoods in the district. So that might be a way to Provide that so we have it. We have motioned. We have a second.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:16:06

Yeah, I'd like to add Because I think this is a big issue I think that a lot of people would do more than Trimming of foliage around their homes in that, you know five to ten foot zone. But to the extent that arborists are required and fees if we can figure out a way to make that affordable just in that circumstance where they're gonna be taking something down that's Close, you know close to the home and I'd like to see us try to do something like that

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:16:50

Was that a second?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:16:52

Yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:16:52

Okay. Okay. We have a motion and we have a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:16:56

So you're suggesting that if someone has a Tree that's considered a fire hazard hanging over their house

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:06

If it's close to the house

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:08

Yeah That they can afford to I do believe they should consult with an arborist because not just it doesn't necessarily have to die.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:17

Right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:18

I mean we want to do everything possible which is counterproductive.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:22

I do want to save the trees yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:24

yeah so that's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:26

yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:17:27

that's understood.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:28

Yeah it wasn't my comment was can we get them the permits to make to trim their trees Some affordable way That as opposed to you know, I don't know that there's some excuse

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:17:46

me.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:47

Is

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:17:47

that part of the motion? I'm sorry Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:50

I wonder

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:17:50

is that part of the motion?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:17:52

I Was gonna make it part of the motion just for the staff to bring back if that's feasible if it's not it's

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:17:58

done Rachel has a comment and yeah, do you want to it hasn't but staff is that I

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:18:06

I think the real quick without getting fully into the tree ordinance, so it's only protected trees for one thing. So I think like the pine you mentioned wouldn't that's not protected and wouldn't require an arborist report but And then second is, I think the concern that was at Rizzoli who stated is requiring the arborist. The arborist has a cost and that cost is too much for most people and so I don't necessarily see a simple way other than just You know subsidizing those costs which I don't necessarily recommend because we have to find some funding to do that. I don' know that there's a way we can lower those costs for people. I guess that we could bring an item looking at the city's fees for permits for tree trimming in the defensible zone and look at

3:19 – 3:2723 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:19:06

The existing tree ordinance is noted only protects oaks sycamores and designated heritage trees not other trees so I think there's a bit of a disconnect between the common parlance Of all trees are protected and the precise requirements of the ordinance so we can bring back some information on where those are Including some sort of info on the current ordinance and then some ideas on options to adjust it with this point in mind I'd also note for anybody into a current situation that There is an exemption that allows for a protected tree to be trimmed or removed if hazardous without the usual process, including without the mitigation fee which is often quite expensive.

But historically the city has required arborist reports to verify that it is indeed hazardous particularly when what that question has itself been contested so the council could take a look at some options there too if that were to be part of the motion

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:20:09

I would just let's make a quick comment. Um, I support the tree ordinance. I support the arborist having to verify that this actually is a hazard so I just want to say that and while I've heard from constituents that they don't like it but You know, anyway that I'm not certainly object to reviewing it and being very clear on it. But I understood that my pine was not you know, I mean that's an insurance question.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:20:46

Okay so actually based upon what I gather that the primary expense there that is is the arborist and that I think the city does not have the control. The permits aren't the big thing, so I'll withdraw that part and just second the motion

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:21:10

Okay all right well we have a motion, we have a second. Do you want to repeat the motion? Do you want to hear the motion

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21:15

again? I want to ask somebody mentioned the mitigation fee. I'm in favor of the mitigation. The mitigation is very very important if we're serious about climate So I

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:21:26

think the tree portion of that motion was completely

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21:29

withdrawn.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:21:32

But I'm happy to look at the tree ordinance and how it interacts when the tree is immediately adjacent They want to trim maybe beyond what you would say is the Healthy thing for the tree, but

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:21:50

well that'll be for a future agenda Okay. So we have Yeah, we have a we have a motion in the second roll call,

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion in the second roll call,
Show transcript
please. Yes mayor sticks. Yes Councilmember rule yes councilmember length. Yes councilmember Whitman. Yes Mayor pro tem Francine. Yes

Okay, so that's five to zero to bring back the ordinance. Outreach

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:22:15

options and ideas for incentivizing perhaps?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:22:19

Okay thank you all right

we will move on to item number four.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:22:23

Before you move on so is it understood that Maynard if he wants to volunteer time that's part

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:22:33

of... Wayne would you help us? Okay, thank you. All right

we will move on to item number four consideration of modifying the structure of City Commissions from five to seven members staff report James

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:22:50

Yeah, thank you Mayor. The City Council in February asked the staff to ask each commission for feedback on whether they prefer five commissioners or seven commissioners. Most of the commissions had historically had seven commissioners and last year over the last couple years those have been modified to five commissioners So the council had asked staff to go to each commission and get feedback from the commissions.

We have done that, and so the feedback is the Planning Commission said that they are satisfied with a five-member commission. The Historic Preservation Commission would like to go back to seven members. was open to the idea of five or seven. They weren't passionate about either option at this time and then the Parks and Rec Commission, their meeting happened after the report went out so I can update that the Parks and Rec Commission unanimously agreed that increasing from five to seven would be preferred So we have the feedback from each commission. The report has the language in the code for each commission.

Depending on what's modified, we'd likely need to come back with ordinances to amend the code and so the first question tonight is essentially do we want to change any of the commissions? And if so which and how? And then we'll come back with ordinances to do so. So I think with that, that's the basics and we'll answer any questions.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:39

I have a question James that might help the new council members because I know this was a change that was made not too long ago

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:24:46

Correct probably over the last year to two

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:24:49

Before my time though, I think okay Can you and I did some two to three years. I did some research on it, but can you sort of explain the history of why? Council the previous council decided to change

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:25:02

Yeah, they think there's you know It was a long ongoing conversation And then we had multiple conversations and I think there were a lot of ideas why but a couple of I There were a few points. One was that we had a couple commissions, like I think Planning Commission at that time was the seven-member commission and they would frequently have not seven members appointed so they'd have five or six appointed and then they'd have a couple people be sick And then they'd have three people available for a meeting. And one of the challenges with going to seven is that you have to have four people for a quorum, so actually you need to have another person. So we ran into a problem and I think it was the planning commission. I'm going from memory but I think the planning commission one year had four or five meeting cancellations because they didn't have a quorum.

So that's, you know, kind of counterintuitive because you think well more people more likely that you know one person being sick wouldn't impact things but we ran into that problem where it was just hard to make consistently have for at least four people to have a meeting. The other thing that happened around that time was we went to districts begrudgingly, we always remind people.

We weren't lining up to go to districts but we went to districts and I think there was an idea kind of big picture to kind of shift to five commissioners for five council members each council member appoints a commissioner and that commissioner sort of reports to that council member And we started to make that change over and started updating some of the language in different places to do that, but we're sort of We haven't done it completely and maybe haven't gotten all the way to where that that idea was But so there is there was a few things going on but those were two of the reasons So the council's sort of one by one started to convert these commissions which Mostly historically had seven back to five I think the one other point I'll make real quick is I think Parks and Rec Commission's another commission That's always been a sort of a challenge to have seven active members So anyway, so that conversation went on for two or three years And then ultimately we made the change and little by little have changed almost well.

I think actually now all commissions to five members So that's where we're at today

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:27:39

Okay, thank you any other

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:27:40

questions Can we also include in our discussion right now the appointment process

3:27 – 3:3927 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:27:52

Legal question based on the language I Think that's okay because the item is agendized as consideration of modifying the structure of commissions from five members to seven members Inherent there is a question of how those five or those seven are selected

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:28:07

And we'd have to return with the ordinances and that language is in the ordinance too, so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:13

And as any other ordinances, first

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:28:14

reading, second reading?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:15

My other recollection is I always oppose all the changes on this, is that some of the members of the council wanted to have more control and didn't want to involve the chair and there was an aspect of that.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:28:32

A little bit of history on that one. So, most of this went down in early 2019. Planning, Historic Preservation and Arts Commission were I believe all modified in April-May 2019. Parks and Rec was modified a little later, I think. No, arts was later. Arts was later. It was historic preservation planning and parks and rec first, arts was later the shift from seven to five And at the time, the then-council focus was based on the public discussions. Matching policy preferences between the five council members and the five commissioners and shifting control of the appointment process back to the elected council members and not having the prior process which had the chairs of each commission, an integral part of the appointment process And just for those who hadn't followed it, the prior as in before that shift process was essentially whether seven or five but typically seven.

The chair and the mayor would, and this is before the elected mayor took, was an elected mayor. The chair and the mayor would sit down sometimes with the Mayor Pro Tem, sometimes with a vice-chair and make a recommendation from a pool of applicants, run the interviews, make a recommendation together Typically the mayor and the chair would try to reach consensus between the two of them They'd make a recommendation at the full council who would then make the appointments always the full council making the appointment But it came out of that process The council made the change in 2019 With arts little later to not have that process In order to as noted tie it back to the elected council To implement the elected mayor component and then late and then to implement the district's component with a different set of policy goals.

Removing the commissions from, you know to summarize the discussion at the time, the idea that the commission should be self-perpetuating was not that council's goal. Their goal was to have direct control of the commissions by the elected council It's entirely a policy question and thus this council can decide whether to maintain that structure or modify it at will. It's a purely political question because you're deciding who and how to make political appointments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:30:52

I have another question, when the time comes after public comment do you recommend we make two separate motions? One regarding the number and one regarding the process for appointment

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:31:05

Leave that to the council if you're not sure If you're not sure if you're gonna find support for one comprehensive motion that it might make sense to divide it up I don't know where the

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:31:15

council's preferences

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:31:16

lie.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:31:17

All right, any other questions?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:31:19

Yeah So Do do you Is continuity required so in other words Do we have to have the same number of commissioners and the same selection process for each Commission? No, can we treat them differently?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:31:42

It's yeah The council can very much have different one rule for all of them or different rules for different commissions it's counsels choice Or several rules you could have five commissions five rules

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:31:51

And they all have been treated differently in one way or another. Some have residency requirements, some do not have residency requirements. Planning Commission for example has to have specific skills appointed. You know people with specific backgrounds the others don't have that so they're all a little different right now. Okay and any of those

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:32:15

choices is the policy choice? And I'll just add to the history that, I think this whole issue came up because Yes, I know. I know But just you know for purposes of public comment but you know this issue came up about potentially adjusting numbers because the Historic Preservation Commission was instructed that they were not going to get staff time as I understood it and that the commission the Historic Preservation Commission was Asking for more commissioners because they were going to have less staff time.

And so I'm really interested in how much staff time is being devoted to each different commission

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:33:18

Yeah, that also varies by commission. I would say... I'm trying to think of a simple way to answer that. So let's start with the Historic Preservation Commission because I think that one is the simplest. In particular, it was the creation of the downtown historic district project where that project was okayed at a joint meeting by the council. Where they said yes, the commission can work on this but it's not initiated by the council so we're not spending staff time on it. And so that's sort of, you know on a month to month basis with sort of just the normal projects coming in it's not necessarily a staffing issue. It was that they I think everybody knew that there was going to be this huge project that would become a staffing issue if it proceeded as a staff driven initiative So that theirs is sort of limited to that topic.

I think, to make the point that I think I've heard from the HPC is at the same time with maybe what they weren't expecting was then dropping from seven to five and now they went from having seven people who could do the work to only five people that can do the work so it's sort of a double whammy you know no staff plus you have two less people The Arts Commission, especially during the period we were doing this.

I think it's well known on the record they were not functioning very well for a couple years, I would say and they went from having seven members who sort of did all the legwork. The arts commission has always been sort of different in that way. They actually have They actually have committees that the two commissioners go do the mentorship program. The grants program, two commissioners go to the grants program.

It's actually not much staff time other than scheduling Brown Act meetings basically and so They weren't functioning very well and they were having a hard time filling those positions, so we dropped them to five. I think now they are sort of recalibrating and figuring out how to work as a commission of five but we have seen...I would say we've seen over the last six months that it's more staff work than it used to be because By its nature, I think when they had seven, they had more people to take on work. When we went to five it sort of shifted to staff with the Arts Commission.

Parks and Rec Commission, honestly I don't think there's much difference from a staff perspective from seven to five on the Parks and Rec Commission. That one is pretty, that one it doesn't change much. And then planning commission I think the biggest thing with the planning commission is long term is identifying their work plan which is something we'll need to, that the council will need to do at some point And then we'll sort of know from there how much staff time there is, but on a regular basis they have specific projects that they're reviewing and so those take staff time.

They are not asking to go to seven. So I think the challenge with the Planning Commission is going to seven Just creates that scenario again where if they can't get four people to show up at a meeting We have to cancel a planning commission meeting. So I don't think that one is necessarily a staff issue so

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:37:00

and they don't want to

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:37:02

And they're not asking to, is my understanding.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:37:05

Yeah I think also for them they're a decision-making body. You know so... We're still in question. Oh I'm sorry

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:37:13

okay. That is a fair point with the Planning Commission they are distinct from every other commission because they have decision making power And and HPC does as well. Yeah, you know so Anyway,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:37:29

so so if I understand what you've said There isn't necessarily a correlation between the number of commissioners and the burden on staff in terms of supporting what the Commission is doing and

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:37:48

I would say what we've seen is it's not directly related to that. There wasn't a magic formula of make this commissioner smaller and magically it's less staff time, we haven't seen that in

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:38:02

six months. Leslie? So actually what I heard was that the hopes of having a larger commission, that there would be more members of that commission to take on work. So it would decrease the amount of staff time

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:38:21

I think that's the thought process with the HPC. And I would say ARTS in the past, so they bought the change but the new commissioners, I don't know if they've...I think they're open to figuring out how to do it different. So that's why they didn't make a recommendation. Okay thank you. Can I ask a couple

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:38:40

questions? In theory though, the commissions are there to lighten the load on staff.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:38:47

Well the commissions are there and really it's to advise the council And I think one thing, you know, just sort of long term and it's not really necessarily relevant to this discussion. But I think one of the things is being clear and having the joint meetings more regularly and being clear, the council being clear to the commissions what they want them spending time on. And I think that over the last couple years We haven't been able to have joint meetings because we legally weren't allowed to have that many people in a room for awhile, during COVID. But even coming out of COVID, we haven't been able to have those regularly. So I think that's been a struggle and then some of the commissions like the planning commission started creating their own work plan or creating their own items for the work plan that we don't know if the council wants any time spent on.

So, I think that's one of the things to maybe focus on this year.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:39:43

And is there any written policy anywhere on how the commissions interact with staff or does that exist?

3:39 – 3:459 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:39:56

There's some languages without affecting the protocols and Summarizing it's essentially do the work is directed by the council and per the code for each of the commissions With variances among the commissioners as to the role but generally, it's its make requests to counsel and then council can approve a work plan and then go do the work plan and The commissions are current per the council's existing protocols and municipal code provisions, are not to self-generate work.

But different councils over the years have acquiesced in self-generated work. That's another policy question is who generates the work for commissions?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:40:35

But in terms of, thank you for that. In terms of communicating with staff and asking staff to do things for commissions there's no written policy on that because that is a concern.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:40:47

I don't know that there's like a uniform written policy and maybe it's something we need to

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:40:52

do. There actually is one I would suggest. The municipal code has provisions regarding city manager's role. Right. And if the manager is the person to direct all staff save the city attorney and the other elected clerk and the treasurer So the council directs the manager the manage X to staff so there is existing policy in the municipal code that the commissions cannot individually direct staff

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:41:11

Okay, the Commission's can't individually but we don't have a We don't have clear language about it. For example like appropriate requests from the commission You know and now I'm being approved by the council beforehand. We've we've implement where we tried to implement that And to Matt's point, where I was gonna go is, I naturally have a relationship where I have to tell everybody else when they're using staff inappropriately. So that's me on the referee and I have 30 people to figure out how to do everything that the council wants to do. And so when a commission comes and says well we wanna do this thing my answer is go through the council you know? And so I think maybe we can, maybe like firm that up and maybe when we come back with the ordinance include some language about like appropriate process.

Because I think it is true. I met with a commission recently and they talked about hiring a staff person. This is just factual, it sounds confrontational maybe but the commissions can't hire a staff person. The council hires two staff people, you know city attorney and city manager. And then I have to hire everybody else. And so, and, and then, you know, using the approved budget by the council to get the staff to do the work that the councils asked for.

So naturally, I will be the person that tells people no a lot. And so I think that is something that maybe we can adopt that policy and some language towards that effect because very frequently when commissioners or a commission gets an idea and they go, we have a great idea and we wanna do it and our first answer has to be no until the council tells you to do it and to use resources to that.

Thank you. Yeah,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:43:04

thank you So If

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:43:13

If there's an interest in having more support, not from staff but from commissioners to go from five to seven. Would it be possible to create at the option of that particular commission non-voting That have members that have You know, maybe they're not officially commissioners but there you know Commissioner light who can? Have the have the At least the ability to communicate with the public that they're working on behalf of the Commission As opposed to somebody who was a just fully a volunteer Yeah, is that legal or is that

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:44:08

The parks and rec commission actually has a position similar. It's the youth commissioner, the Youth Commissioner for the Parks and Rec Commission is non-voting and so they actually have that person I do think It's possible and then commissions also could always form ad hoc committees to research those items that the council has asked them to research. So there's also always that possibility but I know, I think your idea would be to give them maybe a little more of the city backing by giving them the title.

I will note that I think a couple of commissions recently, with some of the different ideas kicked around sort of talked about that and talked about not liking the idea of having like a junior commissioner who's seen as less than. So I did hear some of that. I watched each of the meetings when they discussed these and I heard some of that feedback from some of those commissions. All

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:45:13

right well let's move on to public comment. We have Brian Akins.

3:45 – 3:5629 turns

CommentBrian AikensProposedself-stated3:45:25

Hello there, I'm Brian Aikens. I'm the chair of the Historic Preservation Commission I have been officially on the HPC for over eight and a half years Almost all of that time. I've been either the vice chair or the chair of the commission. I've been to every city Meeting that has taken place that had anything to do with the commissions including staying Five hours since I get here at five o'clock to camp out for the front because it's important to me One of the questions that just came by came out. Well, what do we do if we need help? We have had Craig Walker as our Non-commissioner member of the ad hoc committee for the last several years and and so we have and when we started the downtown historic district We the plan was to do it as cheap as possible and for us to take on all of the Time effort labor everything else So that it wouldn't cost the City $30,000 which was the original effort we did and so there hasn't been any of that expense There was some early staff time in getting the property tax rolls to ourselves That was complicated because as Matt explained to me.

There's kind of this celebrity rule your property tax address used to be On your property listed on your property tax bill, but some celebrities said yeah You know I'm too important for that. Please take it off and then every celebrity after that in person I was surprised to find out mine's not on the record and I never requested that Yeah, the legislature did that one. Yeah so those are the kind of things that for me personally my responsibility last year was to contact the parcel owners I spent nine months doing that my dear sweet wife And again, when we first started this project we had seven members. Currently we have four members even Rick Basacci was around when there were seven members.

Going back they used to, Mayor Johnny Johnson used to say well it's too expensive cut them and it'll be cheaper and we're like wait we're free? And so they turned it over to the commissioners to say, how many members would you like? And three times we went to the commissioners. Three times it came back with every commission wanting seven individuals. Finally when they made the change to elected districts then they brought it down to five members. When we started the downtown historic district, we had seven members. That enabled us to have three members on the ad hoc committee which was Vice Chair Convery, myself and Gina McHatton when we went down to five, we lost.

The knowledge and the interchange with Commissioner or Vice Chair Comfrey who has just massive amounts of information and would have been a big help. And also she knows

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:48:28

people

CommentBrian AikensProposedself-stated3:48:30

We're recommending that we please go to seven we are doing our best through all of these years not to take up staff time and To do this ourselves and to get it put before you as a recommendation and do appreciate your 100% support earlier this year. Well, I was on a grounded plane due to the FAA So thank you all

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:48:57

Thank You Brian

CommentBrian AikensProposedself-stated3:48:58

here if you have any questions

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:48:59

Okay much appreciated any comments online? Yes,

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.753:49:02

we have chair Steve Quillacy Mr. Quillacy of the floor

CommentJamie FlemingProposed · by introduction3:49:08

Thank You Weston I have been a planning commission member when there were seven members and when there now are five. In fact, we were already down to six when a previous council decided to make it five. And we shortly thereafter had another retirement or resignation. So my personal experience is that with seven members on the Planning Commission The meetings take longer and the decisions are not obviously any different.

Second, excuse me, we hook up the topics of parking and of affordable housing and created ad hoc committees specifically because they were on a task list From the council, we did not make up our own committees and issues to address. Third, the planning commission is unique in one way it meets twice as often as everything else but we are case driven. We take up cases that the staff brings to us because of requests for permits of one sort or another.

And the only time that we wind up asking for some staff time for something is if we have questions to clarify the legal situation or the ordinance situation that surrounds a particular case. Otherwise, we don't have any budget, we don't hire anyone and we don' ask staff for additional time. But we are happy with five members right now and would prefer to be left at that level. Thank you very much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:51:04

Thank you, Steve. That's it, Weston? That's all, Mayor. OK, well, we will move on to discussion. Anybody like to start?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:51:12

I'll make a motion

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:51:14

Let's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:51:15

go for it. My motion is that we allow the commissions that want to be seven, to be seven and those that want to be five, to be five. Do you need more than that?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:51:31

I think so. For right now, I think the HPC and Parks and Rec asked to go to seven. So I think the motion would be to allow, to bring back language to make those seven. And then we'll just know that if Arts comes back and says that they want to go to seven that will bring that separately but they needed more time to get to that point so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:51:56

OK so. So just historic is all this is historic and parks and rec that makes sense. And then. Is there a way to word it so that say a couple of years from now there's like a ton of work for the Arts Commission and there's people that are really ready to participate? Do they have to bring it back to us or can they request to go to 7th?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:52:22

We'd have to bring it back because the language in the city code actually needs to be updated.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:28

You could theoretically create a springing provision so you could define the ordinance as, the Arts Commission shall have five members until such time as the Arts Commission makes a formal request approved by majority of the commission to the City Council to increase to seven members at which time the commission shall have seven members upon the appointment of two more members by the council.

You can do something like that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:52

What do you think? Because things change. I

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:52:55

don't necessarily think that accomplishes anything because either way they have to make the request so to me it's we can save some time and not touch that one until they make the request and

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:53:05

that is simpler yeah the other if I could ask In your motion, or do you want this to be a separate motion? How the additional two are appointed. Because right now-

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:53:16

That's a key

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:53:16

thing. Every commission is appointed the same way. The mayor has one appointment, the other four members of council have one each and then all five have to be ratified by the full council. That works cleanly with five. If you're adding two more we would ask how the council wishes the additional two to be appointed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:53:34

Well, I'm going to make a stab and if we decide you need to separate it. I would say let's just look at how we used to do when they were seven because I remember going to meet an interview with Mayor Johnson and with the chair of the commission And we would interview each person and it was, you know, we wouldn't decide. We wouldn't deliberate in front of them but we would one by one maybe three or four applicants and then after they left that we would decide either at that moment or in a day or two.

You know, and we would definitely consult a member of the commission. The commission could send I think usually it's the chair but of course the commission could You know, they could send whoever they want. But I think there should be...I think it makes sense to have the mayor and a council member and a member of the commission. That's my recollection is how the process used to be.

To me this is very, very serious because we're looking for commissioners that will stay the course. That's one of the things I look for, that they're ready for the four-year commitment and there are many things to look at how long they've been in the Valley And their background and the topic that the commission, there's so many factors. And I think that we need to acknowledge and respect the commissioners.

The process should be well thought out so that we get the best commissioners.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:55:18

So we have a motion. Do we have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:55:19

second? Okay,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:55:22

so we have a second let's and let's have some time for comments I mean my concern is with staff time and money actually Because adding more people is going to add It's more expense More interviews more vacancies. We have to put ads in the paper You know anytime there's a vacancy We don't have a large pool to pick from as we know. And so is there, can you put a friendly amendment?

If we can't get people? Well no my friendly amendment would be I mean really in terms of how the commissions interact with staff so it really is a help and that

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:56:08

I think I sort of got that consensus, that when we bring back the language that we can... We'll bring some language back in one way about just making very clear those roles and that requests from the commission need to go to the council before staff time are spent on them. So we'll figure out how to document that and get that on the record.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:56:34

Any other comments?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:56:36

Yeah.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:56:36

Yep, Andy

3:56 – 4:0960 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:56:40

So we did open this up to include the process for selecting commissioners There are our Planning Commission ordinance says that each council member Shall appoint one commissioner ratified by the approval of the majority of the full council. We currently only have one commissioner who was appointed by anyone on this City Council and I think I'm talking about planning and I think planning should reflect the city council And so I'm not sure why, what the process is or why each one of us hasn't had the opportunity to appoint a planning commissioner.

I also note that the Planning Commission Ordinance says that we are to have two members chosen from persons who have distinct separate training and experience from the fields of architecture, art building construction, civil engineer, land use planning, land use law, urban planning, landscape design. I don't know that we have any Planning Commissioners who meet those criteria and I also think that if we have only five commissioners we should only have one commissioner who is not a resident of the city because otherwise you run into the significant risk of quorum problems And I think in the Planning Commission, in particular where you reside has big impacts on your decision making.

So I would want to address all of those things. Is

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:59:01

this an amendment to the motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59:04

I think it sounds like we should separate. I think we have

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:59:09

to separate them and I would make some comments on...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.793:59:12

There had been no comments yet so I was just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59:15

making comments. With all of those concerns, I think we should separate the appointment process from the number. Okay, so is it too intertwined?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:59:29

HPC and parks we're talking about going to seven So I think that's one vote whether or not we go to seven And then second would then be and it makes sense with PC staying at Planning Commission staying at five Talking about how those appointments should be made. That can be the second part of the vote

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:59:46

Part of that motion includes looking at how commissions interact with staff and

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction3:59:52

yeah, and having some language come back about How how that interaction will occur so

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:00:00

okay. All right, so we have a motion in a second Roll call please. Yes

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion in a second Roll call
Show transcript
mayor Mayor pro tem Francina. Yes mayor sticks. Yes councilmember Whitman yes Councilmember Lang. Yes council member rule Yes.

Okay, thank you. So now it's up to the commissions to decide and now we'll open it up in terms of the appointment discussion

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:00:24

So I think specifically about the planning commission is okay. All right,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:00:28

Andy Do you want to continue or you're finished?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:00:34

Question for clarification isn't aren't we looking at the plan at the selection process for all of them not just planning yeah because we're talking about adding two new ones and To I think Commission so that we have

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:00:48

two

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:00:48

more yeah points. Yeah,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:00:51

yeah Okay, so I would say let's first start talking about how we appoint people

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:00:55

well Can I also mention that if we're going to talk about how we appoint? Commissions that have five members were not just talking about planning

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:01:04

okay, so we're talking about planning and potentially arts right now

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:01:10

Yeah, and they don't have to necessarily be the same. So you know like the issues that Council Member Whitman brought up about like the Planning Commission has to have members in specific fields, architecture, art building construction et cetera. That's not the same requirement as for the arts so there's parts we can talk about both or we can just talk about one. So that's up to the council.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:01:39

Okay,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:01:40

and then I guess another question though is do the other commissions have this language which says each council member shall appoint one commissioner ratified by the approval of the majority of the full Council.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:01:55

Yes HPC has that language as well So to

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:02:00

parks and rec so to arts

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:02:02

all of

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:02:02

them

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:02:02

do

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:02:03

all of them

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:02:03

have that and I think all of that was the recent change Sort of yeah going to five and reflecting Councilmember appointment just individual councilman.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:02:13

Just add a little bit of history your question of why? How does that? measure map to the council terms That's a quirk of history. When the prior council made the decision to switch to one-to-one appointment, five council members appoint five commissioners, the council considered a number of options at the time including shortening the terms of existing commissioners to force a hard adoption or other choices and the choice made by that council was to allow attrition so no current commissioner lost their seat and to allow All the current terms to stay the same length. So, the Power Council didn't align the term length to match. That's a policy choice though. The current council could choose to make the terms match. Some cities do that some don't.

It's a policy choice.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:03:02

Why don't we start talking about how we make the appointments? Anybody want to start? Susan?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:03:10

I thought I heard Councilmember Whitman ask why we haven't all had a turn. Did you ask the Planning Commissioner? I thought that simple answer is there hasn't been a vacancy since we've been seated. We, I mean, I'm definitely not in favor of terminating anybody. You know

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:03:30

But that isn't the language of the ordinance. The ordinance says each council member shall appoint one commissioner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:03:38

When there's a vacancy? It

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:03:40

does

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:03:41

not say that. Well, therein lies... To answer the point it's vague enough to cause the... I understand the vagueness but when you read it in context it's clear keep reading and the other sections and in the Planning Commission one is not in the staff report it's in the next section. The others like HPC for example it's in the staff report The language that was adopted regarding the district component is clear, that it's set to match. And it was done to be the next seat that became vacant was District 4, then the Mayor, then the next three seats, Districts 1, 2 and 3 in order. But all of that was then Council's policy choice. This council could revise the policy choice to make a one-to-one match on terms expiration or not. It's up to the council.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:04:22

So I mean what you're saying is we could just nix them all and say that we're all reappointing?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:04:27

And I'll note that a number of cities have commissioner terms. All of them expire at the same time as councilmember terms, and that creates a staggering because you The council member terms are staggered here. It's it's a three and one and one and two in one and one other cities that's you know, three and two varies how it staggered but the The other cities that do that approach each Commission term expires with a precise mapping to the council member who appointed them. So that when you have a new council member election, then the new or returning council member gets to reappoint or make new commissioners and you never have a commissioner sitting who is not appointed by a council member who's on the council. Okay. So whether to do that or not is a policy choice, but that's what it affects.

It creates a perfect mapping of political preferences between the elected officials and the political appointees. Whether to do that is a policy

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:05:26

choice. So we could terminate all commissions? Correct. And reassign everybody? I'm putting the extreme out there because it seems like a horrible idea to me. Having been said, I can see that there's some support here for doing something.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:05:48

Well let's focus our discussion on what the system that we would like to use to appoint member commissioners so anyone want to start? What would we like?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:05:59

I would like a system where the council can take turns with the appointments. I think that was the previous... Were you there?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:06:13

For the five-member commission or the seven, or are you saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:06:17

for both? Whenever there's a vacancy. My recollection was that Johnny was always there. Is that correct?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:06:26

Yeah, it was always the mayor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:06:28

And then he would... maybe the liaison? You know there were some... I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:06:34

wasn't...

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:06:36

There was

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:06:37

no hard

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:06:37

rule. It varied by mayor. One problem and I think maybe we have a different problem now than we had back then where back then it was typically filling like one position So the mayor would either bring the liaison or the mayor pro tem Or you know, there was it was done differently each sort of each time but one I think maybe what you were Suggesting was like the mayor and the next council member Go and then appointments made him in the mirror. And then the next council member would have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:07:12

involving a member of the Commission

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:07:14

The only problem with that, that I would warn is that we've had several situations recently where we had like two or three appointments. And if that were the case, we'd have the same interviews two or three times because of the mayor... Like let's say it was your turn and the mayor and you would go interview the five candidates and then you'd select or you know, you guys would agree on one. And then the next person's turn and we'd have to re-interview four of the candidates again. And then the next person's turn we'd have to interview three other candidates. So I think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:07:44

That

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:07:45

rotation well, and it's it's not necessarily normal that we have like three vacancies at once But it's happened a few times recently So I think the idea of the staff liaison or I'm sorry the council liaison And the mayor would be a good one because then it's just one round of interviews if there's one candidate two three Whatever. It's one round of interviews so that would be simple enough If you're looking for an option to go that way

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:08:11

Yeah

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:08:13

Component that some cities consider is not relying solely on those who apply But requiring the council members the elected officials to find commissioners to be their commissioners So it's another choice, too Yeah, you put the onus on the committee on the council members to fill your commissions and

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:08:35

Right. Could there also be a nomination process or like from the community, communities nominate?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:08:42

That can be done too. Yeah that's a public choice too.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:08:47

Just coming back to my big concern staff time and money and Making this as streamlined as possible and efficient as possible. So What do you think James is the most efficient

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:08:59

going back to what I was just saying? Like there were times where we had scheduled multiple rounds of interviews for the same candidates, you know So I think the idea of, if we were gonna go that route of going back to the interviews, I think setting a standard where it's like the mayor and the council liaison to the committee at that time. That's probably the way to do it. We'd essentially be scheduling one round of interviews.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:09:28

The most streamlined, okay. Well does anyone wanna make a motion concerning that? Andy?

4:09 – 4:2240 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:09:37

So we're talking about members six and seven for the two commissions. Is that what we're talking about? Are we talking about...

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:09:46

I think that's the first question.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:09:48

Well, I think it should be two separate motions because I think that it makes sense to treat those separately. The five versus the seven.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:09:58

Yeah well for purposes of planning I'm in favor of the one council member, one Planning Commissioner approach because that creates a natural liaison and it creates responsibility and the elected official for who they have making planning decisions because I think you mentioned one other commission that makes decisions that don't necessarily ever go to... The

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:10:37

HPC, Historic Preservation.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:10:38

Okay and what types of decisions? Oh they make decisions on whether you can modify something that has a historical significance.

CommentWayne MaynardProposedself-stated4:10:47

Yep

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:10:49

yep. Okay for purposes of planning I like the one to one approach and of course I like the idea that we would recruit for planning commission members if we do have a vacancy but I guess that's you know if so we have Like I said, we only have one commissioner currently selected by one of our council members. And I don't think that's a healthy set of circumstances and I don't think it reflects what the public did in electing city council members.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:11:53

Do you have a motion

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:11:55

specifically for purposes of the planning commission. I think that we should have one council member and one to one planning commissioner relationship.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:12:13

Is there a second for that motion?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:12:19

I would second that motion, but I would like for some discussion about about it.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:12:24

Okay So you're you are asking that we boot all of the planning No, okay. So what are you asking? I'm sorry.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:12:34

It's each individual council member

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:12:37

uh-huh

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:12:38

would decide and they We've we've or I don't know if this is part of the ordinance But we have it organized by district So, in your District district one council member rule. Jamie Bennett is the commissioner and it would be your decision whether you wanted to continue with him whose term expires in May of 2024 in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:13:23

Can I ask you a question because I'm not following is Jamie Bennett in her district. Is that what you're saying? No he's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:13:30

not in my district. He's not in your district. Yeah. My understanding is that each district, each council member based on their district has selected Planning commissioner,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:13:49

so yeah He doesn't nobody has to be in anybody's district But we still would have to have the same number this to me seems outrageously complex And I would not support it in any way shape or form that we would realign up with the planning board at this particular juncture that we would go ahead and Mean I just I think early disrespect to I think it's

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:16

crazy, but basically it's the same It's the system that we've been using Correct Andy. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:14:22

mean Vacancies

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:24

we had I mean but each count we would rotate and council members would appoint someone

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:14:30

Yeah I'm not sure about the history on that but

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:37

Who is your counsel?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:14:39

Jeffrey

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:39

Starkweather. He

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:41

doesn't live in the city. But wait a minute,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:47

it's not a requirement that he live in the city. Any

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:49

council?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:50

He doesn't have

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:50

any

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:50

qualification. And you don't like him at all. Excuse me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:14:54

He's

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:14:54

highly

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:14:55

qualified.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:55

Hello! Stop

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:14:57

it! This is wrong. This is really

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:15:00

wrong. Why is it wrong? We can take time out or your personal feelings... Why don't we take a five-minute recess Mayor? Yeah let's take a five-minute recess. Sousa, are you in the house? Okay we are back and I'm just a reminder to counsel it's it's we may disagree on policy but let's not make it personal and could you please. Bring in through the chair which means acknowledge make eye contact with me and raise your hand that would be much appreciated in terms of a running efficient and fair meeting so we'll move back I think we should address

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:22:38

commissioners six

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:22:39

and seven tonight.

4:23 – 4:2935 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:23:07

On the concept that each council member shall appoint one commissioner.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:23:13

And do you want to make a motion about appointing six and seven?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:23:19

I have no idea how to appoint six and seven

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:23:25

Okay, all right

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:23:26

go

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:23:26

ahead Leslie

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:23:28

I Motion can you hear me? I motion that we table this whole thing because I think that we all need a little bit of time to think about what this actually means and Like I this is new to me how commissioners are treated Thank you very much. And I don't feel like I am in any position to vote on this or even to internalize and understand all of the ramifications. Therefore, I make a motion that we table this and bring it back at a later council meeting.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:24:19

Okay is there a second for Council Member Ruhl's motion?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:24:25

I would second that we do bring this back that we bring the selection for the five member Back at a later meeting, but we do need if we do pass You know the if we have we do have the issue of six and seven of the historic HPC and also the parks and rec and and so Would like to add on to the motion that staff come back with With information about how the previous council selected six and seven we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:25:07

already

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:25:08

And and that we that we reviews that review that I

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:25:14

Okay, so we have a

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:25:15

motion. We have to bring an ordinance back to do HPC and Parks and Rec Commission. So that would work with sort of what we need to do

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:25:26

anyway. Can I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:25:28

make contact with you?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:25:29

Oh yeah, no I'm sorry just to repeat we have motion and we have second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:25:33

So I'm not understanding what's so complicated, six and seven. Wouldn't we reach out to get two more commissioners just like we always do? And then we go through the normal process like we used to do when there were seven commissioners. What's different? Didn't I sort of make a motion that we just Make the appointments, the way that we did for years and years and years when we had seven commissioners.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:26:05

The mayor makes the appointment after interviewing with.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:26:08

No, the mayor and one other council members which makes sense that you we rotate and You know, you could even speak to the mayor if you have you know Or we could do liaison, you know There's ways we can do there Well how we can I would like to just go back and ask Johnny like what he remembers but then and then The chair or another member of the commission is present. So you have three people present, I think the three is important. Then you put your heads together and make sure that it's a fair appointment that works well with everybody else.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:26:50

So you're making a substitute motion to Leslie's to about six and seven, correct? Can I make a comment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:27:00

Well, I'm looking for guidance.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:27:04

It actually is essentially sort of the same thing Councilmember Lange made a motion for Coming back with the history on it. And so we have to bring an ordinance and then I think by default I'll write it the way that we historically did it Yeah, and then we'll have the option at that point So yes, and historically yeah, it was the mayor one other council member in the Chair of the Commission

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:27:32

Okay, we have a motion in the second. Yeah

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:27:34

question James didn't you say that there was a problem with that if you had more than one? That it could conceivably be an awkward situation or I was trying to understand that but It's 1030 and I can't wrap my head around all this

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:27:47

mostly if we If I think what I was referring to is like I thought maybe we were going in the direction of like a combo where it was like a mayor and then a rotating council person. And I was saying that would be a hassle for lack of a better word, because every time an appointment was made, we'd have to rotate and do interviews all over again. But if it's the council liaison, if we have one opening or two openings, it's still just one set of interviews. So I think that could work as an example I'm trying to remember what commission you have right now. Planning? Parks, you have parks

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:28:25

and rec.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:28:26

So we have a parks and rec vacancy right now. So historically how it would've been done like we said it's sort of always changed but the general thought would be the mayor, the council member liaison so you and then the chair Susie Taylor, I think is the chair at this point. If there's one vacancy it's the three of you if it's two vacancies It's the three of

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:28:47

you so my problem with that is is that I change every three months So next time over at the historical preservation, I'm gonna make that decision and then I'm gonna go over to plant Well, maybe not but then I going to go over to Arts Commission in three months and I'm gonna make that

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:29:00

There's some luck of the draw there where if you just happen to be on the commission whenever there is an appointment, one person could theoretically have that. But you're not going to be on all commissions at once so...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:29:13

No but I mean yes it could be luck of the draw but it could be that

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:29:17

I end up

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:29:18

making all

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:29:18

the appointments in that model. It could end up three years down the road that you've appointed seven people and somebody else has appointed one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:25

We can sort that out. If Councilmember Whitman wants to particularly be involved with the Planning Commission, couldn't we have some language that if I happen to be the liaison? We

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:29:40

aren't talking about Planning Commission because Planning Commission's got five. Okay. The planning commission is mapped perfectly to council.

4:29 – 4:3527 turns

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:29:52

I think we bring that back, we explain it and then everybody has a month. It'll probably be a month on us like realistically to put the ordinance language together and stuff so everybody has a month to think about how they would want to fine-tune the language.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:30:07

One final comment is if I could jump in in an era of Strong political realities. It is important that the ordinance language be precise. Some of the old system worked when the council was always 5-0. That was that world, we aren't in that world so to avoid To make the clear rule We would write the ordinance to take the old process and write it plainly and then the council can react to that So I think we have assuming this motion were to pass we can write up what we understand was the old process And then it'll be up to the council in public with the ordinance language on the table to decide if you want to codify that Process or codified different process, but I would just note that that some of the old way worked when we had Lockstep 50 collegiality that doesn't always work when you don't have lockstep 50 collegiality That's and when you don't have that, that's okay.

You don't need it That's when three votes controls and we need a process that makes it clear how three votes happens

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:31:15

Thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:31:15

you, man. The ordinance can do that.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:31:16

Okay? All right Well, we have a motion a second could we have the roll call please Weston?

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion a second could we have the roll call
Show transcript
Yes mayor ready councilmember rule yes Mayor sticks. Yes Mayor pro tem Francina. Yes Council member Whitman Yes. Councilmember Lange? Yes.

Okay, 5-0 to do what we're going to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:31:40

Can I make just one comment that I hope everybody will feel good about? In fact, if we see someone in the community, we can encourage them to apply when their application is on file. We can always do that. You know things change and we should do that, you know if we meet an architect that wants to volunteer And has the kind of skills, you know that we like

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:08

Okay, we're gonna move on

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:32:10

to

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:10

item number five I

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:32:12

recommend continuing actually I think we have to continue

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:32:15

The

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:16

deadline

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:32:18

is not till early May so we have a little bit of time

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:24

Okay all right well let's move on to council member reports.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.754:32:28

The SCAG General Assembly is May 4th and 5th so the next meeting on April 25th could decide

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:35

It's

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:32:37

tight well,

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.754:32:38

I mean

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:39

can I just say something can we talk about number five for one? I would like to go Okay as a delegate so I mean if we can I'll make a motion. I move that Betsy stick I'm here Betsy

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:32:52

sticks represents this council. Thank you All in favor aye

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:32:56

Hi. Hey, Palm Springs here I come! Okay, Councilmember reports? Anybody

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:33:04

have anything to report? I'll

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:33:09

just jump in. I saw Red at the Art Center was incredible so I just want to shout out to the Art Center for putting on such an amazing performance. Mark Rothko and the studio art tour was on Saturday A lot of incredible art out there. We're so lucky to have so much bounty here in the Valley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:33:30

Anybody else? Yeah. No, go ahead. Okay. So this Saturday April 15th, we're having our Coexisting with Wildlife in the Ojai Valley. And that's your chance to listen to three incredible women experts and where we have Beth Pratt who is an expert on mountain lions. And then we have ones we have they're gonna also discuss bears and coyotes And first I'll better tell where the event is. It's at Ojai Valley School Lower Campus, it's free from 2 to 4 o'clock but will open at 1 30 because there are displays and the presenters will be available and Julie Tumamite will open and we have some students who are particularly interested in coexisting with young kids. They're going to do a little poem, it's going to be a wonderful event. We have about 250 people pre-registered and there's 300 seats so if you are serious about coming it's best to RSVP but I want to say it was brought home to me why there's multiple signs that we need this kind of event But I got a call from someone who used to work at the Humane Society, and she reminded me that when she worked there, she got a phone call from a teacher who said there was a mountain lion crouching on the other side of the fence.

And she wanted to know what to do! So the first thing the person on the old-fashioned telephone said Where are the kids? She says, well they're just playing in the schoolyard. She said line them up have them walk slowly into the nearest building you know because you got to know the basics so that everybody doesn't freak out and something doesn't happen And we're in the reports are incredible. People are really seeing this and we want to do, you know, in communities that don't address it there's often very tragic results for both people their pets and the mountain lion so we want to get on top of this

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:35:43

yeah Thank You Sousa anyone else City Manager support

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:35:49

I didn't have a PowerPoint.

4:35 – 4:4323 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:35:56

Microphone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:35:58

Yeah,

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:36:01

so there's sort of good news things we wanted to share one is so last year the city provided some support to the Earth Day celebration. We hadn't done We haven't really done an Earth Day celebration for a couple years, so just a reminder that we've partnered with the Community Farmers Market on the Earth Day celebration on Thursday April 20th at the farmers market from 3 to 7 p.m..

And so, you know come participate or come check that out. So that'll be next Thursday somehow it's already April 20th and then second we wanted to just remind people we know and it was it came up earlier today that It rained and that creates potholes and so we were That's a problem we hadn't had for several years, unfortunately. Because it hadn't rained for several years but we're seeing them and so we posted some information online to remind people how they can take pictures and submit those potholes through MIOHAI. We have had I think six and I think we might be up to eight that have been reported.

The Public Works team has been great about going out and filling them very quickly And so we are reminding people about that. One thing just to note, we get tons of complaints right now about Ojai Avenue and Maricopa Highway but just to remind everybody those are state highways so Caltrans actually has to respond to those. So although we're not able to work on that People, if they report them we're going to commit to getting those requests to Caltrans so that we can try to help sort of facilitate that. But a lot of their issues are related to the big paving or the pipeline replacement project as well. So but we'll try to help with those by getting that information to Caltrans And then just a reminder, we mentioned earlier too that the paving project is currently out for bid and we are working to bring that back to the council in the next couple of meetings to really get moving on the paving plan.

But we wanted people to know that we're still trying to fill pot holes and things in the meantime so.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:38:23

Well thank you James and Public Works Department for filling those so quickly. Okay, future agenda items?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:38:32

Yes. I would like to figure out how to put the future agenda item on. I would like to join the budget committee. I am very interested in figuring out ways to fund the ATP as well as learning a lot more about the budgeting of the city. I know that we have a community member, Johnny, who has lots of experience and I feel free to go to him to ask him for any kind of help. But I have been on FinComs before and I think not that I really want more work but I think that I am committed to figuring out how we can get more money into our coffers and whether that be a TOT tax or whatever that be.

So I'm asking James and or Matt, how does that happen? Does it go on to the agenda? Yes.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:39:26

Okay. So I think the most recent appointment was Johnny Johnston. We had that as a I don't remember now if it was a consent item. I think we had it as a consent item, but I'll double check that. But it did get approved so that we have a formally approved budget committee. So that can be added assuming...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:39:49

Okay and I've also had a lot of experience with the vacancy tax because the state of Vermont has a vacancy tax on all property taxes on second homes. So I'm also very interested in looking at that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:40:01

Can I ask a question? So can we have, right now we have Mayor Sticks is the only council member. So we only have

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:40:09

one council member currently so we can have two. We historically had one but if you remember Over the last two years we had added councilmember Weirich as the second to the mayor. I think Johnny had added him and then that continued for Until his appointment or until his term ended so we can't have two it's it's a choice of the council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:40:32

Okay, well, I would be in support of putting that on the agenda if that's what's necessary Yeah And are we going

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:40:43

around to? Well, I just quickly. It

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:40:46

just

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:40:46

needs a second to

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:40:47

get

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:40:47

on

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:40:47

that. Yeah, it's a second and then it comes on the agenda in future. I did a

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:40:50

second didn't I?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:40:50

Yeah, I heard a second. I heard Mayor Pro Tem Francina provide a second

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:40:55

couple of people have asked about and we talked about this last year flying the pride flag in the month of June which I know takes what has to happen James he told me

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:41:07

So the gist of it is, and Matt can probably explain it better than me but I'll try to explain it very simply. When we fly any flag that's basically not the American flag, you know, it's speech of the city and so we like, I can't make that decision to fly it because I'm not the person deciding, you know, the speech of the city and so The way other cities do it is or I've seen other cities do it as they all actually adopt a policy that says As the city here's what we will do and here's what we won't do and you know And kind of lay it out so that it's all fair and transparent and everything. And so I think The idea was that we'd bring sort of a policy back for that because right now we don't have one So we only fly the American

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:41:58

flag And the key component of that is to maintain that the city's flagpoles are government speech spaces only. The First Amendment breaks into government speech, public fora, quasi-public fora. We do not want to create a public forum in our flagpole because we can't control what flags go on the flagpole. The flagpole needs to be a government speech space subject to council approval So if council adopts a policy that says that flagpole is government speech and the following things are authorized with some discretion at mayor's choice or councils choices applicable, then it maintains a government speech space. We don't have to fly whatever flags we can limit the flags to those that council wants. We can certainly if there's a mayor made the request that sufficient put on the agenda, we can draft a flag policy and bring that forward.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:42:42

And that's June, correct? I should know that. So we plan to bring it in May so there will be time for us to do that.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:42:53

Yeah, we can get that. We can meet that timeline and I'll note some cities do the pride flag Separate from a flag policy just a straight-off council vote fly a pride flag That's also a choice if you don't want to look at a broader approach It might be simpler. If we just adopt a policy if there's Council support for it, but it's up to We can explore that

4:43 – 4:4934 turns

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:43:15

One thing that I would like to see as a future agenda item after my tour at EJ Harrison, I would really like to see us adopt an ordinance banning single-use plastics. Can I make a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:43:30

comment about that? You know, I was looking at the advertising for the bowl events because that's been on my mind too. And they don't allow anybody to bring their own drink so you can't bring your own water bottle right? They

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:43:51

sell beverages and I think that they're tightening it up because What we have been told in the past was that? Concerts themselves don't make very much money. So they were really looking at being able to recover costs by selling Beverages and thing and things like that snacks and things like that We can follow up with them and ask I sort of think there's a lot like a common sense. I think there's like a common sense water, you know water would be allowed but we can find out if you know yeah so but um but so as far as the item a ban of single-use plastics like like water bottles then right?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:44:35

Fortunately, most of our businesses are already using compostable lids and so I want to just big shout out to our restaurants and coffee shops. But that would also include like straws, drinking beverage straws, lids, to-go containers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:44:56

Can I ask you, Rachel, do we... James, Rachel and I had a question. I don't know if we need to ask you just tomorrow but we were worried about with the parking committee and the deadline for the valet parking?

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:45:13

I think we're gonna meet it I think I think what we're looking at right now is a parking committee meeting in a few weeks and then we'd have to make a recommendation then to come back to council at the end of

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:45:28

May. We may be looking at an earlier, I think an earlier Council item on that one with the sort out if we can get more time for the plaintiffs

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:45:40

I'll follow. I think I have to follow up with Matt and find out what legal but I think I've solved the date, but I need to talk to Matt and make sure it works

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:45:50

so Okay Are we good?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:45:53

No, I got one more I'd like to See an ordinance banning mylar and other helium balloons Yeah, my daughter's a marine biologist and it's horrific what it does to the ocean. So

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:46:21

I heard second and third.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:23

Hey

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:46:26

anything else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:46:27

Well, I always have a long list but probably you have enough. Yeah, I mean, whenever I go down Grand and I see people with kids on the back of their bike in little groups and they're zigzagging in between the cars and then they end up on some little strip of... I want to get Grand Avenue to 25 miles per hour at least that sets the tone for all the other side streets But I mean if you know, if I had my druthers the whole city would be so there'd be no confusion.

Do we have a second for that? Since you're making a list, maybe for the summer we can get into that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:47:09

As long as a traffic engineer looks at it and gives us his recommendation I'm okay with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:18

Yeah whatever. I know what I've seen and I see it every day and it's not right. That's a route to school and people should not have to be worrying about You know Grand Avenue is becoming you know The new Ojai Avenue and we need to do something to help the pedestrians and the bicycles Yeah, I

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:47:40

agree. But if if you don't have a traffic engineer sign off

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:45

I know, I know.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:47:45

You're potentially liable for an injury that they blame on that traffic design that you made.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:53

Well, that's going to be part of the discussion.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:47:55

We'll note that as part of the process. There

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:47:57

is

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:47:59

some new state laws that adjust that requirement a little bit but generally we have to maintain this balance between the legal requirements and our insurance requirements so I'm hearing a second to have the discussion

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.794:48:09

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:48:10

yes. And maybe on that same day we can discuss the sharrows that are fading away and where they should be going and then signage you know there's that we need to handle grand and I know we don't have any money but we'll figure it out

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:48:29

So I think with that item we can talk about grant. I could tell you I dug into it and part of the problem was, I think there was a prior staff person that was handling it and they committed to things that they couldn't really commit to so we'll have to have a discussion about And without getting into it completely, but to do certain things you'd have to remove parking and I don't think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:48:53

that they ever.

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:48:55

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:48:55

we've been discussing it for 20 years and the time has come. We never

CommentSalt ParkProposed · by introduction4:49:00

had that discussion

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:49:01

with the council.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:49:02

Council decision to do that. That's what has to

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:49:06

happen. But we will have that discussion. Yes great thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:49:10

Okay all right well thank you all for a productive meeting. Thank you all for hanging in there with us and we are adjourned.