UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:0629 turns
Roll call please Weston.
Roll call — called by Weston Montgomery
Show transcript
Commissioner Bennett?
He's on his way in from Santa Barbara.
Okay.
Said he might be late.
And Commissioner Starkweather? Here! Council Members, Mayor Stixx?
Here
Council Member Ruhle?
Here
Council Member Lange?
Here,
virtual
virtual correct Councilmember Whitman Mayor Pro Tem Francina
here.
Thank you, Weston and I'm going to read something about Councilmember Lang being virtual. Hi Rachel. Good evening the Brown Act authorizes members of the City Council to participate in meetings remotely under certain conditions Assembly Bill 2449 which was signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 13 2022 is effective January 1 2023 Permits Council Members to participate in City Council meetings remotely when they can demonstrate just cause or emergency circumstances and when a quorum of the City Council is physically present in the city.
Council Member Lange is participating in tonight's meeting remotely under AB 2449. Council Member Lange is participating under the Emergency Circumstances Exception given a contagious illness Council Member Lang will be participating in tonight's meeting using audio visual technology per AB 2449. A council member participating remotely due to emergency circumstances requires council consent I'll ask if there's any opposition to this request anyone?
Okay, seeing none we will proceed. Council members participating remotely under AB 2449 are required to disclose at the start of the meeting whether that any other individuals 18 years of age or older are present in the room at the remote location with the council member and the council member's relationship with the individual. Council Member Lange would you please confirm that you're the only person 18 years or older in the room your teleconferencing from or else disclose those persons over 18 present with you?
I'm the only one here.
Thank
you James, and is there an approval of agenda motion to approve.
I'll move to approve
in a second. I'll second. Okay, roll call please Western.
Yes. Councilmember women. Council, is that a yes or no.
Yes or no. Yes.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move to approve in a second. I'll second. Okay, roll call please Western. Yes. Councilmember women. Council, is that a yes or no. Yes or no.
Show transcript
Will we be doing a Planning Commission vote?
All right, thank you. And we will move on to public comment. Are there any public comments? And just a reminder that tonight's public comments are on the item that is on the discussion agenda. We have one. We'll begin with Drew Mashburn.
Good evening, I'm Drew Mashburn I've resided in the Ojai Valley nearly 72 years next month. My family's been here since the early 1920s, when this 25-year plan goes ahead and expires, I'll be about 96 years old. Hope to still be here, may not be. You know, I admire any persons that step up into government and fill the various positions, councils, planning commissions, Our chief anybody.
At the last. Yeah, this is a you know I looked at the at this whole package just like 100 pages long it's overwhelming. It's a lot of information for the public to digest and discuss among themselves and. I'm looking at a no vote tonight, if we're taking a vote on anything this substantial for our future. The public needs more of a chance to weigh in on this. I'm a retired guy.
I retired almost eight years ago and I can't have been able to keep up on it. At the last council meeting, I believe Councilman Whitman seemed to be moving towards having each present council member select a planning commissioner of his or her choice. I agree. I don't believe that all the present council members hold the same sentiments about this issue as the previous council.
I'd like to see a planning commission that reflects each council member's likes and dislikes. This would lend to a better balanced planning commission for expressing their advice to this extremely, extremely...I cannot express it enough how important this is And it's going to go ahead and not just affect us right now, it's going to affect future generations. Please keep that in mind when you make your decisions tonight.
Thank you Drew. Next we have Bill Miley then Brian Eakins and then Wayne Maynard. Yes, that's correct bill.
But I want to hear it first.
Well we're taking public comment first and then we're going to have the presentation
may ask a question Mayor can the public asked questions after the presentation as well. I think that's what Bill Miley was asking.
0:06 – 0:1322 turns
Okay, good evening. I'm sorry Councilmember
women.
Well,
presentation
with that would you prefer bill I mean we have two other cards.
I intended to speak on the safety issues transportation and usually There's a presentation, administratively first people hear about it. You ask questions, and then the public speaks that's what I came for.
Okay, would you like to make your comment now or later? Okay, thank you. Brian Aikens.
Hello Planning Commission Council staff. Our chief and others. There were a lot of pages I pulled it out, pulled out 19 pages that I'm focused on. They are mainly focused on the Ojai Avenue area and I'm interested to see how housing will intertwine with a downtown historic district and whether that will be supportive of that or distractive of that so thank you very much.
Thank you Brian next we have Wayne Maynard
Wayne Maynard, I'm a resident of Ojai. My specific interest tonight is with the safety element provisions on the general plan The current safety element that we have was developed in 1991 and it's like 57 pages. Reviewing the information in the agenda item package, it appears to really only focus on wildland fire and we have a lot more safety issues that we need to be addressed just look at the existing plan. We've got seismic hazards flood hazards geological hazards with you know With soils, a bunch of things that are covered. And so I don't know if you're just haven't progressed that far yet or if you're intending on leaving all that kind of stuff out.
I'm also have a specific concern with regards to just our fire protection in the community as a whole for building fire protection not just
wildland.
We have a very Long time it takes to get enough firefighters into our valley to actually make a good aggressive attack on a building fire. And that needs to be addressed, I believe in our plan as well. So that's all I have.
Thank you Wayne Weston any comments on zoom.
Yes Mayor we have one on zoom two on zoom now. First we'll have Renee, followed by Becky. Pardon me everyone, James Han it appears I don't have the ability to let them in. We'll just need some technical assistance. There we go. It's fixed. Renee you have the floor.
Hi, this is Renee Roth. It's so nice to see you all together in the same room. I'm sorry I can't be there today. I've got a conflict. So is this the
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
public comment for the general plan.
Okay, all right. So hold on let me get access to my document here I just printed it out
Mayor, I think we should also make sure the public understands that they can also comment after the staff report. The present you know the presentation just to make sure yes.
Okay, I have a conflict so I would like to talk now just briefly.
Thank you.
Okay thank you are small town. Has basically been relatively unchanged for the past 35 years, but we are facing new challenges as it has become increasingly popular. With tourists leading to an influx of cars and traffic, and dogs and shoppers. Additionally faster alternative modes of transportation like e-bikes and e-scooters are becoming more popular. In simple terms, we must address the need for more infrastructure to support the cars and the traffic and the people who want to come to our beautiful town including various types of housing for all sizes and income levels.
However, the most significant challenge we face is the lack of affordable housing, which is worsened by a small but vocal group that opposes any new development in the hope of preserving our small town character and access to nature. We are at a tipping point, and it is essential that we dress our antiquated and aging infrastructure needs now and be willing to pay for them. We must also incorporate environmental standards Into the housing element to promote the most efficient use of resources.
This includes adopting green building policies and regulations designed at the state level, including the use of renewable energy sources, energy efficient building materials. and water conservation and fire safety standards with design for more sustainable transportation options, including in any of this new development. It looks like I'm running out of time. I just want us to work together and make this happen to improve our public services and infrastructure. Thank you.
Thank you, Renee. We have one more comment in person, Kathy Lattes?
0:13 – 0:2218 turns
Well,
okay I admit i'm a little confused because I would actually prefer to make a comment after we hear the presentation but so I since we just walked in. I'm sorry I'm a little late and I didn't quite get the
you can do that if you
process, I would prefer
Okay, thank you one more comment online.
That's correct Mayor Becky, you have the floor now.
Thank you, Weston. Yes I'm speaking off the, this is Becky Wyndenwood again tonight and I'm speaking off the cuff because I really had a hard time grasping all of the material that I found in those hundred pages, but I do have a couple of things I'd like to Ask of the councils and the others assembled tonight, particularly. We have a government we're supposed to have a government of the people by the people and for the people.
And that means that the people's voices must be heard. And as Drew Mashburn pointed out earlier this is an awful lot of information for people to digest in a very short period of time and to line up with all the different stresses and challenges that we're having in our community now, as opposed to when this original general plan may have been created. I want to say in response to the idea that those who want to preserve Ojai Its environment, its charm, its hometown atmosphere. It's affordability and so on and so forth are not anti-housing that is a misnomer that has been too often used to divide our community.
And that is simply not the case. Most of us who want to preserve Ojai, want to preserve Ojai for the locals as opposed to always pandering to tourists and those who want to come here who end up pricing everybody else out of town. And then we lose the fabric of our community. So what I wanna ask of you all tonight is to consider The people who already live here and what they would like to see in their town. It looks as though there was some kind of a survey that was done, I noticed that there's something about three out of five respondents agreed with this or something like that.
I don't know how those respondents were chosen if all voters in the city of Ojai received a questionnaire that they could respond to and that might be something you can go into in your presentation tonight But I just want to make sure that everybody understands that those who want to preserve Ojai are not anti-housing, but we are more focused on the locals who already live here and would prefer not to expand our population because it is simply unsustainable.
We live in a small valley with limited resources and we must attend to the truth of limitation and not our hubris. Thank you.
Thank you Becky. That's it Weston?
No more via Zoom, Mayor.
All right thank you very much all right we will move on to our one discussion item general plan update joint meeting with the City Council and Planning Commission for city council determine with input from planning commission preferred alternatives to the land use element transportation element and safety element And before we introduce our consultants, I did talk to Councilmember Lange earlier this afternoon. We were reviewing the general plan so I believe Councilmember Lange you have a motion?
Yes, I actually wanted to hear what the presentation but I am in alignment with what Becky and Drew shared that. It would be helpful to workshop this, to get more community involvement. Actually Bill Miley in the public comments that he emailed mentioned that there were 160 people participating in the surveys and workshops and that represents such a small fraction and a disproportionate number of those people were older residents. And so my motion is that We, that we actually have another workshop on this and we involve community members and we get more input. So to give this more time that we don't adopt this right away.
Okay thank you. We have a motion is there a second then Council we can discuss? Yeah
I'll
second. Okay any comments from council?
If I could add one more piece to this too, if it's okay to add one more. So the other thing that I noticed is a glaring there are a couple of pieces that are missing and one is a climate, there's nothing about climate in here. And a lot of the The data was collected before really the, we like this was March 2020 was when the housing research was collected and this is before COVID. I just feel like there are some missing pieces that would be really helpful to include as well.
Thank you Councilmember Lang. All right, we have a motion and a second. Go ahead,
Susan. Could our city manager just briefly refresh us because my recollection is that we've had so many meetings. And I mean, I would consider if we need another one but I just have a long memory of multiple meetings.
Yeah, we have it was actually part of the introduction so I might end up repeating it but we were going to remind everybody because we know that there's been a lot going on over the last three years a lot more probably pressing items for people trying You know, get their kids to school and survive the last few years. And so we were going to start with sort of a refresher of how we got to this point starting with the you know it's almost become legend but the fact that we kicked off the general plan update the day that the COVID emergency was declared and we had to cancel the first meeting off the bat So going back to that point, we've had several attempts to get community input. Stakeholder meetings, council meetings, planning commission meetings.
We did a program where we tried to have and I had actually forgot about this until earlier today. We tried to have high school students from Nordoff participate in what I think was a survey that we did with them? We did a community survey with 200 community members who responded, and then to the question from the member of the public about you know how we chose people. We actually had a series of workshops that were just open meetings so people could choose to attend or not.
Exclude anybody and one of the visioning workshops had over 100 community members in March of 2021, which admittedly was quite a while ago. And then in August of 2020 or December of 2021 we had the last sort of PC City Council. Well, we had an item that came to planning commission and then came to council to discuss vision and guiding principles and had a lot of public input at those meetings And then in August of 2022, we had a community workshop.
On policy options related to land use policy transportation and safety that had 150 community members and as part of the introduction, we were going to just refresh everybody's memories that that workshop with those 150 people. And that feedback is what led to tonight's, the analysis that we did in tonight's item. So we've had a series I think it's fair and we would be the first to admit that we weren't planning for this to go on three plus years and so it's also fair to say that you know it's been a long process but we've had several meetings over the last three years.
0:22 – 0:3445 turns
Oh, was your intention with this motion that we take a vote at the beginning of the meeting? Because I would not be comfortable to do that. I would consider revisiting that at the end of the staff report and the presentation. I don't know how everybody else feels but I'm not prepared to vote for anything at this point.
I understood that to be her motion and that's what I supported is that we'd hear the staff report And that we'd hold discussion. But as far as voting on direction, we make a further effort we can talk about to get more public input was my thinking if the motion was intended to get more participation by the public and I'm Perfectly fine with us going forward with the meeting. Okay, up to the point of voting on actual policy direction
just
wanted to be clear.
Thank you. So, to be clear, your, your proposing voting after the presentation.
That's correct. Okay,
thank you and
after discussion.
Yes,
yes, and after public comments as well.
Okay.
Leslie.
If you could, at some point try to tally up the numbers, the hours. Because as true as this may be people come or they don't and I've heard about this numerous times so i don't know how we would change or get more people to come. We certainly could try so Like the numbers, how many workshops have we actually had? What were the topics of those workshops? How many people showed up and I would be the first to agree that the demographics probably are highly representative of one particular demographic. But I think it'd be also good to have those numbers.
I call that the interest of demographics
I would say, you know, yeah. But I'm also, you know, outreach is outreach and like I think it's wonderful that we attempted to get some Nordoff seniors in. Did they come? Yeah.
And I just was getting an update on
that. You can tally later.
We got about 10 responses from...we tried to work with a high school group and we got about ten people, ten kids who actually filled it out. And, I think roughly we're talking 450 to 500 Participants, but obviously disclaimer like could be some of the same people showing up multiple times.
Okay? Yeah and I have no objection to revisiting that motion after the presentation and if we could also think about what the next steps would be if we were to postpone and not go back to the drawing board but potentially you know, extend the outreach. What would that look like? Or are we asking staff to envision that for us as well? So thank you.
Could I make a
comment? Sure
can we just wrap this up in one
second about this okay
sure good
um i looked at the demographics of the last survey and obviously the people over 65 was greatly disproportionate uh the population that's and it's not surprising who comes out to things It seemed to me that the one way you could get a better true demographic look would be to do focus groups, where you pick people by demographics. And you had several of those that gives people information in advance so they understand what their giving an opinion on, and you can get more in-depth feedback. That would be my only suggestion as we're going on but probably doing more public workshops we're gonna get the same people coming back out again I suspect.
Thank you. Okay so just a reminder about the sequence. We will have the presentation from Raymond Associates and then on the three different sections right? We will discuss after each section correct James?
Yeah, that's what I want to make sure I understand just with trying to understand the motion. So, I think maybe why that motion was made is that the sort of the plan right now is that we'd have a presentation from our consultant Ramian Associates and then they were going to focus on the three main areas and ask for feedback and direction So I think what I, what I heard was that we start with just the presentation and not have that feedback and direction portion yet. And then at the end decide what we want to do.
Okay, that sounds reasonable so go through all three sections.
So we'll just, we'll just go through the presentation I think Ron's on the zoom so i'll say it now and then we'll repeat when, when we know he's hearing us but I think the idea would be will just will go through the presentation and then decide where we're going from there.
And there are about 80 slides, so we'll sit back and get the popcorn.
Coffee.
OK, well it's my pleasure to introduce Ron Whitmore and Raymond Associates team to prevent the general plant update. Thank you so much, Ron and team for all your hard work on this much appreciated.
And if I may just give a quick introduction before we do that. I just wanted, I think we sort of said a lot of what what I plan to say but I sort of just wanted to remind everybody about what the general plan update is and the fact that it's one of the most important things we can do because it's the guiding document for the city 25 years plus into the future, it's essentially the Council and the Planning Commission and the community participating through workshops working together to set the course for the city.
Essentially as we move into the future every decision that we make should be reinforced by the general plan or should reinforce the general plan Uh, it's a major project and ambitious project. Most cities when we had when we were getting consultants and we're doing comparisons most cities in the county spend over 1Million dollars on the general plan update. We are fortunate that we're able to get a bid for much less but it's it's A big project. It's a large scale project.
And as I said, we are now 3 years and I think a month into ours. We had planned to have it done quicker than that, but many of the impacts we mentioned earlier such as the pandemic really impacted this. I think I've said this in meetings before but one of the jokes that we've said is the first meeting we ever had I told them Ojai would never ever have a virtual meeting so don't ever bring it up And then by the next month we were told you can only have virtual meetings so.
So we had to change our strategies and we had, you know plans to come in person and those move to virtual and then you know all these different things. For that reason, we have Ron's going to give a presentation that was mentioned a moment ago as I think our estimate was 80 slides. And part of the reason we're doing that is trying to sort of make sure everybody has the same base foundation in the information how we got to this point Where we're at, what decisions have been made to this point. We've adopted our guiding principles, our vision statement, we've had the visioning workshops and we've also had community workshops on the land use element transportation element safety element policies which have gotten us to this point and Ron will go over that a little bit more but kind of He's going to get into a lot of detail, and so I will end it with just reminding everybody to try to think kind of high level big picture.
Three areas that have come up nonstop in the workshops we had where there is just so many different ideas about what could happen in these areas, what could be done in these areas, is Bryant Street and Bryant Circle, Ojai Avenue There's areas there where there could be some interesting live-work type of arrangements, and Montgomery Street and how businesses and residences can interact on Montgomery Street. And those three have come up every workshop we had they would come up. We did one where we broke into really small groups and each small group was digging into those three topics kept coming up So we will get very detailed, but I would encourage everybody just sort of think. Remember to also think big picture we're talking about over the next 25 years what do we want to see in those areas and in the city as a whole so with that I will turn it over to Ron to
James can I just
sure
Commissioner, or I'm sorry chair policy has a question.
Yes. I noticed in the staff report it, it mentions land use element which I think we're kind of passed at this point we've gone back and forth with HCD a couple times.
That's the housing element.
So that's our housing agenda. Land use circulation and safety, but also listed as environmental justice. I understand that this is a required element of the general plan now, but it is not going to be a separate element rather it's going to be infused into all of the other elements specifically the three that we're talking about tonight. And as I read this 86 page briefing, I didn't see any of that so I'm hoping that Ron can Let us understand how environmental justice is being woven into each of these three elements now, which is what I'm told it's supposed to be happening.
Yeah, and I would say that so the list you're referring to the bullet point list is the list of all items we plan to include in our update. Right? The list of items which is just the three land use element transportation element and safety element are the three that are the focus tonight.
So we're not going to discuss environmental justice at all tonight?
Not except only if it comes up in relation to one of those three pieces. So it will not be the focus of tonight. And so with that, I'll ask Ron run is just for everybody he's attending virtually he is, he will be on the screen. The screens on either side but run. Can you take it away.
Yes, good evening thank you James. Thank you Mayor sticks council members commissioners is the audio and video working okay on your end.
Yes, it's working and run in case you didn't hear coming in. So the idea or the request from Council at this point is to get through the presentation without stopping to focus on those three key issues get through the presentation and then come back and see how the council wants to handle it so
yeah I was I was listening in on a previous conversation Thank you.
0:34 – 0:5326 turns
He heard
what we were talking about. Is that what he said? Sort of.
More volume.
Higher volume. Are you having trouble hearing me on your end? Yeah, it's not very loud. We'll ask James to turn it up. Can you give it a shot, Ron?
Yeah sure is this any better? Yep. That's better. You're very good. All right yeah please don't hesitate to stop me if you're having any trouble with the audio or the video. Again good evening Thank you all for gathering this evening. Good evening, members of the public. My name is Ron Whitmore. I'm a principal with Ramey & Associates which is a planning firm with offices in Berkeley and Los Angeles. I am the project manager for the Ojai General Plan update. James if you could show the slides, I'd appreciate it starting with slide one and then we'll transition quickly to the next slide.
Can you put it in presentation mode, James?
James, you have to enable editing before you can do that. It's the button in the highlighting at the top.
See there. Is that what Weston is supposed to be doing right now?
I don't think so. James Hahn's running it from the back.
There you go.
Perfect. Thank you. And you can advance to the next slide, please. So while he's advancing that slide so with me tonight in addition to your excellent staff resources there and James and Lucas who we've been working with very closely on all of this all along I have with me here tonight Megan McNulty who is a senior planner with Reaming Associates Who's been focusing on a lot of the land use work for the Ojai general plan update.
And also I'm short notice, Sean daily from I terrorists who is the transportation sub consultant for the project was able to join us this evening because we heard that there were some questions about the traffic impact analysis that was done for the land use possible and use change option. Megan and I will do the bulk of the presentation since Sean wasn't planning on being here originally, but he will be available to help address any questions that come up specific to any of the transportation.
Slide please. So we have two main goals for tonight's meeting. One was to provide a brief status update Council members who may not have the full background. Most importantly we are planning on talking you through some of the key policy options that have come up. That we thought would be helpful to get councils direct guidance on before we proceeded with Transportation and safety policy options.
Now James just to clarify, we were going to share a very abbreviated version of the presentation not that full 88 slide deck is the preference of the council for us to share the entire presentation?
No, I just didn't count what the abbreviated was so continue with that we provided the full version in the packet as background but just if you can continue with that and then if specific questions come up we can
okay excellent yeah we do have that full slide deck at our disposal. In addition to that we have all of the background documentation, the reports from all the public engagement outreach, all of the technical studies and Depending on the nature of the questions, we have a lot of good resources at our fingertips that we can reference and even share on screen depending on the nature of the question.
Question? The summarized version is just taking out stuff so that's... We have it all, it's just we've got to skip pages. Okay.
Yes, it'll just... Yeah, we hit a number of the slides and so we'll be going in the same progression generally, just not presenting some of the slides that are in your full packet. Okay. And again, we'll just be the purpose tonight is to really focus on five of the options that are noted in that full packet, the three land use changes, the complete streets approach and the direction for wildfire mitigation knowing there was limited time we decided to focus on those Assuming they were the ones of greatest interest, and from which we would need the most specific guidance from City Council. We were going to stop after each section but my understanding is you'd like us just to complete the entire presentation and then stop for questions and discussion is that correct?
Yes.
But what if we change our mind after we see it Let's
let's let the presentation go, and then we'll each take turns.
Well he did ask
okay I would. I think it would be easier to stop after you section
myself
questions but I'm not sure how we got to the agreement not to. Not to stop between each section
could do a compromise. And if we're all happy to move on, but sure you have questions
after each part okay and then Ron we just let us know when each section is completed. Yeah
there's actually a slide that tells us it's time to stop and asked if there's any questions and supporting deep discussion so that'll be easy.
Okay, thank you.
So there's a few different parts to the presentation. The general plan overview is very brief, as is the quick overview of phases one and two of the project. Having heard a number of related questions tonight from both public and council commissioners, we're happy to provide any more detailed background information about any of those but I will be providing a very brief seeing primarily on the policy Next slide, please.
And you can proceed as well. So high level as has been noted already tonight the city of Ojai has a complete general plan those elements and their most recent date of update is listed to the right. However this is a focused general plan update Focusing specifically on the five elements listed on the left, land use circulation safety, environmental justice and housing.
The housing element as has been noted was adopted by the city council already and is in the final stages of HCD certification. Likewise, as noted earlier based on the environmental justice analysis done at the beginning of the planning process The plan is to integrate environmental justice goals and policies into the other elements, the land use circulation of safety elements specifically as appropriate.
Next slide please James. So as was mentioned earlier also it's a plan in general plan processes tend to be multi-phase and sometimes lengthy we're about in the middle of the process in phase three And that is the focus of tonight's presentation. And I'll give you a quick overview of those first two phases before providing more background about the policy options.
Importantly, and I were really just focusing on policy direction. There will be a full set of goals, policies and actions coming in the draft general plan which is the next phase of the project And the current. approach we're discussing with the city is that we come back to the City Council Planning Commission. After there's a, an administrative draft of that plan prepared which would cover to be everything all topics and all levels of detail before it then went through extensive public review and then back to the planning commissioning council for adoption so just just so people understand this is certainly not the last bite At the apple to get some high level direction from the city council so that we can proceed with developing the full plan, but will be coming back to you at a minimum of two more times.
Next slide please James. So again, a very quick synopsis of the first two phases of the project phase one was focused on documenting current conditions that should inform the planning process. 10 reports were produced focused on a range of environmental, demographic, housing, economic, land use, parks, transportation and environmental justice topics. Those are all available on the city's general plan webpage as are all other project documents.
Phase two is focused on crafting a clear vision instead of guiding principles for the general plan Those were based on extensive community input, including meetings with city commissions to community surveys and a community visioning workshop. Everything we've learned from the existing conditions analysis and that community input was summarized in a draft vision and guiding principles document which was then reviewed by the planning commission and adopted by the City Council in 2020.
What you see on the screen here is the vision statement. None of it, I hope would be at all surprising members of the public and commissioners and city council members. It is a description of what the community aspires to be in the future general plans are 20 to 30 year plans. And so it's a vision for Ojai and roughly the year 2045 describes that communities desire character and conditions in that time era.
Likewise, next slide please James and this is just the topics covered in the general principles but there were eight guiding principles that were also adopted along with the vision. They complement the vision and established a high level direction needed to achieve that vision. These principles and the vision adopted by council are also on the project website.
These are designed to be foundational to the rest of the planning process, each subsequent step in the process should achieve the vision or work towards achieving the vision and be consistent with the guiding principle. Next slide please James. So as I mentioned, my overview of a general plan and phase one and two is very brief. You have more detail in your full slide deck, and we're happy to address any questions you may have about them.
But what I'm gonna do first is give a brief overview of the third phase of the planning process, the policy options phase, and then turn it over to Megan who will introduce you to the first land use policy option. We'll then pause for questions and discussion. So as I noted earlier, the purpose of the policy options is to take a preliminary incremental step towards an administrative draft general plan but without yet going into that level detail. It's to take a moment to make sure we're very clear on the desired direction of the highest level, highest priority policy options that are being considered for the general plan.
So in the case of Ojai Given that it's a focused update on, focused on land use, transportation and safety. We focused on those three areas. We're now at the point where we, second section there on the slide where we'd like your direction on these options and then they become... That direction becomes the foundation of the administrative draft general plan along with a policy review and a lot of other related research and community input that we've been gathering.
The land use policy options specifically will become the foundation for any changes in the land use policy map that is fundamental to the land use element and the transportation and safety policy direction will be reflected in the written policies of those two elements. Slide, please. So to get to this point, this is a slightly more detailed explanation of how we got to where we are tonight. And you see there where we are tonight noted by the icon back last year, we began working with the vision and the guiding principles as a foundation, as well as the previous community input. We began working with city staff on developing some options We developed some concepts which were brought to, I believe the Planning Commission and Council in the spring of last year that concurrently we completed a full policy review of the existing general plan policies done by both the technical team and city staff.
And then explored in depth a variety of land use options, and through a working meeting with city staff in the middle Narrowed down the options that we thought were those that should be brought to the community for consideration. And so then in August of last year, we did that. We held a workshop in the same room where you are this evening presented a number of options at stations around the room where people could learn more about different options discuss them leave comments make recommendations fill out a form It was sharing their thoughts on each of the concepts being considered.
And people could also fill out that same form through a poll after the workshop, I believe it was for at least four more weeks after the workshop. So there was quite a bit of opportunity at that time for folks to weigh in on the different concepts that we were considering. We then took that community input further refined our land use options and consultation with city staff, and then took those to I terrorists are transportation consultant. Knowing that there is concern the community around congestion and particularly increases in congestion associated with any land use changes, we wanted to make sure we had a clear understanding of what those traffic impacts would be. And so we had ITERIS do a traffic analysis, it's reflected in the memo and the packet of materials you received and got those results and then summarized it all in preparation for tonight's discussion.
Next slide please James. And so the hope is that once we get direction from City Council, we then summarize that in a memo. And that along with all the previous works becomes the platform for us drafting the general plan which I said earlier will come back to you and draft form go through extensive public review and then back to you for adoption of I should note that what we're presenting tonight and the limited number of topics we're talking about tonight is not reflective of everything that will be covered in the general plan.
It will be a full update to all three elements, and so there'll be a wide range of topics and subtopics addressed. I believe a member of the public asked previously if there were other hazard mitigation and safety topics that will be included in the general plan, and the answer's absolutely. Um, we know that Ojai is very susceptible to a number of natural hazards many of which are being exacerbated by climate change.
And that safety element will address all of those comprehensively and in a way that's consistent with SP 743 which requires a full climate vulnerability analysis and that that findings from that analysis be reflected in your safety. And so I think by way of background, I think that's what I was going to share for context. Obviously you know how to get in touch with Lucas and James if you have questions following tonight or any point during the planning process. And also on this slide here is the web address for the general plan update where you can find all of the materials that we've developed to date if you want to take a deeper dive.
But otherwise at this point I was going to hand it off to Megan who will introduce the land use topic generally and then get into the first land use option that we were hoping to get some feedback from you on. Megan?
0:53 – 1:0818 turns
Yeah, thanks Ron. Next slide please. Can everybody hear me okay first?
Yes, yes. Thank
you. Can I ask
just really quickly? So there seems to be some confusion as to what we're actually here to do and what we're here to vote on. And so we're not in any way approving a general plan. We are basically looking at options on three segments of the general plan as a way to give our vendor a direction, a way to go correct. So we're evaluating their findings from the community outreach and they've come up with these suggestions or options on ways to proceed and we are to basically vote on or give opinions on these particular options that they're offering us as a way for them to move forward But not to draft anything final, not to say you know yeah I'm voting on this or no I'm not voting on this. We are in the very preliminary stages am i correct? In this general plan of the work that's been done so far it's now ready for us to say These options seem reasonable, or something like that so I just want some clarification because you know we are there are a fair amount of council members who are new who have not been part of this.
And it is a little bit confusing.
So, in short, there were key areas that kept coming up and all the workshops and things and so those areas, we did a deep dive and we looked at what could happen in those areas. We were very thoughtful about wording so we called them policy options not policy recommendations because they're really options that can, that we're bringing forward to for the Planning Commission to discuss and then the council ultimately decide which direction we want to go and I'll give an example of Bryant Street.
You know, we heard a lot of feedback about people have different ideas about Bryant Street. This is one option that another option would be to not make any changes, you know another option would be to give feedback about other changes that are desired, but we analyzed available options based on the feedback we heard. And how they can work. It's not a final decision, it's direction which we then will take and we'll develop the next draft document that will then come back to the planning commission in the council as well so
thank you.
Alrighty, so I'll jump back in. So again everybody my name is Megan McNulty. I am a senior planner with Ramian Associates and happy to be here with you all tonight and walk you through the various land use policy options. Next slide. Now before I get into those options, I'll walk you through a couple concepts that are important for us all tonight. So the first is general plan land use and general plan land use it guides how land can be used in the future in Ojai through the year 2045 which is the horizon year of this general plan update The land use policy options we're going to present to you, they explore different potential changes to existing general plan land use designations as well as policies.
So in the general plan, there will be a land use map. The one that's shown on this slide here is the current general plan and land use map. And this map shows proposed geographic distribution of various land uses in the city but also the general plan lays out allowed density and intensity of land uses. By density and intensity we mean scale roughly of developments how big and bulky a building can be. So as you could see general plan Land use is important for regulating use and also kind of the look and feel of Ojai in the future.
The general plan land use map is really a foundational piece of this general plan, because it impacts decisions and policies in land use element but also related topics like mobility and infrastructure considerations. Next slide. Now, general plan land use is similar to but different from zoning and existing land use. So zoning is regulated in the city's zoning code per state laws. Zoning must be consistent with general plan land use and if general plan land use is changed or updated the zoning code must be updated along with it.
Existing land use isn't entirely a different concept and it refers to uses that are currently on the ground in Ojai Sometimes though, existing land use does not conform with general plan land uses. So for instance you could have a retail establishment in a place that currently has a general plan land use designation of residential. When this is the case where existing land use does not conform with general plan land use, the use is allowed to remain but if the site were to redevelop with a new structure or a use in the future it would be required to conform So next slide.
So when we dig into these land use policy options, to start with the process of how we arrived at these options which has been explained a little bit by Ron previously but the map on this slide shows the potential change areas I'll cover in the next couple of slides and these include Montgomery Street, the commercial manufacturing area and the Bryant Industrial Area As well as the Ojai Avenue corridor outside of the downtown area in the blue area highlighted in this image.
So when we started the general plan update process, it was not a foregone conclusion at all that these would be the areas we would be studying for land use changes. But during the process, as James has said, we conducted technical studies and heard a lot from the community that made us consider potential land use options for these particular areas in the future.
So we've started by identifying potential change areas, and we are testing various options here for land uses. And all of these land use options are potentially you can think of them as potential different ways that the city can go about achieving this vision for the future. Originally our land use change area map covered more land actually than you see here through working meetings with city staff and based on feedback we got from City Council and Planning Commission, we narrowed down the potential change areas to the ones shown on this slide.
Next slide. And this slide provides more context as to why we are looking at these three areas in particular. So first the Montgomery Street corridor. It became an interest because allowing residential in this area was discussed at a planning commission meeting in the summer of 2021 And when we brought to the community and community engagement activities early in the planning process, we brought the idea of potentially changing land use designation.
Many participants were supportive of allowing some level of change in this area and having the area be slightly different in character compared to what it is today. In the Bryant area, Planning Commission also discussed at that same meeting potential for allowing additional non-residential uses to diversify the economy in this area. When we brought this idea to the community many were supportive of that change and many people also during the community engagement process brought up the idea of potentially adding residential to this area.
And then along the Ojai Avenue corridor When we brought the potential for change to the community, many respondents thought of this area as an area of some change or transformational change. And some people thought that residential should be encouraged. And again, you can learn a little bit more about the specifics of community engagement that we heard in the early stages of this process. This is a very small snapshot but I think it's important to understand the foundations from which we developed these land use options.
So I'll start by presenting a little bit more detail on the three options, I believe starting with Montgomery Street and then we'll pause for discussion on that area. So next slide. So first the Montgomery Street Corridor. Now we're not talking about land use changes on the entire corridor, we're specifically talking about the portion between Aliso Street and roughly Oak Street which is highlighted in this slide.
Current land use mix here currently on the ground there's a mix of retail office and residential uses. The scale of development is mostly one story sometimes two stories and currently 35 feet is allowed in this area which would allow it to three stories The current general plan land use is general commercial, which allows retail office and hotels but not residential.
So it's important to note here that the general plan land use designation, which does not allow residential, is inconsistent with the actual land uses on the ground, which do have residential. In addition, the zoning code is consistent with the general plan land use designation in this area, but that allowed residential uses like the general plan land use designation So next slide.
So heading into the Alternatives Workshop we held in August 2022, we wanted to understand which type of land use mix the community wanted to see along Montgomery Street in this area. So we asked participants which land use option they'd like to see along Montgomery Street. Their options were no change, allow residential and make the area village mixed-use, which is consistent to the designation of area to the west Next slide.
So here's a snapshot of results. Again, I encourage you to check out the workshop report from the workshop and survey if you haven't already done so. But when the results came in about 50% of respondents selected no change. The reasons for citing no change were really important. What we heard at the workshop and through the survey is that folks wanted to keep this area's character the same as it is now.
Most people did not envision change in this area They wanted to maintain the existing scale, land uses and character of this district. And some respondents were interested in seeing housing types like single family uses ADUs and live work units which I believe are already... Some of those are possibly already allowed in this area but there were some concerns cited related to making some changes in this area including concerns about traffic providing water for residents and preserving existing character So this is the last side of the section next slide. And so with that we have an option for you to discuss, and that option would be changing the general plan land use designation from general commercial which does not allow residential to village mixed use.
If we were to do this, This would require changing the zoning as well. Reasons being, as I mentioned many people cite a desire to keep uses and character in this area the same as it already is on the ground and this character does include residential uses. Again the current general plan land use designation is not in conformance with what's on this ground so making this change would enable this mix of residential retail and office uses to continue Lastly, if we do make this change. If it's one thing to note to think about in the future, if we do not change the designation, if we continue to have this general commercial designation, and some of these residential uses that are currently there now do go away. You have to remember that new residential uses would not be able to develop in their place only non-residential uses would be allowed to go in So the next slide is where we pause for discussion and Ron and I are happy to field any questions you may have about this area.
So real quick, before anybody jumps in at what Megan just said is really important but I think we explained it in kind of planner ease, and so I want to explain it in maybe more general terms. The survey we did in the workshops, we did people said they didn't want to change Montgomery. But what Megan was just saying is that. The what currently exists at Montgomery is not actually allowed under our code and so when they say they don't want to change Montgomery, we had to dig into that and realize what they're saying is they want to allow what's currently at Montgomery. And so by that point.
That's the point that Megan made about that right now there's residential uses on Montgomery, that if they came in to apply to do residence now they would not be able to. But they're current, they were there already there. And so we had to look at that and realize that what we think people want is they want it to be the same as it is on the ground now not what it is in the books now. And what it is on the ground now is more of a VMU which is shorthand for village mixed use which allows residential retail and office space. So just to sort of recap that that's why The survey looks like it says don't change this but it was reading into the detail to figure out what they actually mean, what everybody meant by that. So anyway sorry to interrupt Megan.
Thank you James thank you Megan and so we'll turn to questions and comments from commissioners and council members and if you could just bring it through the chair in the spirit of efficiency and fairness anyone like to ask a question or comment?
Susan? So we're mainly talking about North Montgomery, just to clarify that. Correct. And I like that we have a photograph of Meg's Ojai House and I still don't know if she ever got what she wanted which was to be legally village mixed use. Did that ever happen? No, I don't
think so and I think that she commented on that as part of this process.
Yeah.
It's part of what we're referring to about people saying they want village
mixed use. So, which is when
we
started the
process
yeah I would definitely agree with what you stated. Would like to keep what there is, but and probably make it more pedestrian bike friendly. Because yeah, that's all I have right now.
1:08 – 1:1329 turns
Okay anyone else
question about can ask questions?
Yeah you can just let me know so I can because I'm
keeping an order here
okay go ahead Jeffrey
on page 27 you have the pre workshop it looked like from my looking back on the Summer you had on the line, that's about 70 people participated in that. So do you consider this 58 want some change? 27 want transformational change to be the same result that we got in the 60 people in August or... It's hard to tell what they mean by change. I guess you could interpret it that means They want to change it to how it is, but it's not pretty clear.
They do mention allowing residential so maybe that is the same.
Yeah and that's where I was going to say for Montgomery in particular this was one when we just read the results and you read it and it's like oh that's surprising we hear so many things like Meg from The Nuthouse saying that she does want changes and so but then reading the detail and reading all the responses together Was how we realize that know what they're saying is they actually want this to be a VMU area but they think that it was already VMU because that's what it looks like when you walk down the street.
So, to answer the question. That's why I don't think that that's why we're pointing out that just like the percentage of people who said no change we don't think it really is. That's not really what they intended.
So my question to you and or the
planning would be, would there be any risk to the residential
You know, the single family dwellings there if they were to do a major remodel or if they would want to put an addition or or would it be legally nonconforming and so there would not be a problem for them.
Yeah, as it is right now. The residential use in that zone is legal non conforming and correct me if I'm wrong. And so, if that use is somehow abandoned. And then they come back and later 2 years down the road say we want to turn it back into a residence they would not be able to under the current code. And so, the. The idea with this would be designating those as VMU would give the option to either be residential or business slash office.
And so just in closing, that's my district. So if anyone feels like I need to go knock on doors and do some canvassing and find out in very personal one-to-one focus groups what they would like, I am also very happy to reconnect with my constituents.
Chair Quilsey and then John.
Thank you, the Planning Commission some time ago received written notice from I think it was eight of the 11 parcel owners in this area and they all wanted to move away from C1 preferably to VMU so there's been some canvassing done already.
Thank you. Commissioner Trent?
Yeah, so I live in that area we walked down there all the time and it is village mixed use in the nature of it. But we've heard concerns that there's currently the way the mix is where you'll have a commercial property owner who has a commercial business in that space and they want to sell it, and they can only sell it for commercial they can't sell it for residential.
So it hinders them. on what they can do and I have the example but I don't want to say it. Okay,
all right. Just one second. Okay. Anybody else.
So if I don't understand what someone said. If you, if we by the time, I mean that we have clarification as we go along
yeah I just think it's really important to hear all voices so um, can we
understand
what you said member Whitman and then
I have a question too, Betsy.
Okay
yeah
i'll get you Rachel go ahead
what's your clarifying
question? That was a big point is that the same as like for example on North Ventura Street it's mixed use I'm familiar with that street what he just said I've never heard that before that if your residents To be mixed use is a residence live work.
Right,
that's what it is so why on earth when they go to sell.
1:13 – 1:2026 turns
The way it is right now, the way the code is written, where they're zoned.
Okay,
the way
that code is written,
and
that's what we need to change?
Yes. So I think what we're trying to say is people think that's VMU already, but it's not. Exactly. And so when we talk about changing it, we're really trying to update all the documents to match what's really there. That's what
works. Okay. So then when they go to sell, it'll be the same.
Yep. Or if it's a commercial business and they want to sell it as residential, they could. It would still be VMU so you can have that mix of use.
Okay thank you that is so important. And
Mayor if I could add one point on there? Right now any existing residence in this area that Zone C1 that's an existing house with folks living in it can be sold as the house because that existing legal non-conforming land use is transferable However, if an existing commercial property a little store somebody wants to sell that and the buyer wants to use it as a home they cannot live in it because its own commercial C1. The proposal on the agenda would be to shift the zoning and the general plan land-use designation to village mixed use which would allow that existing store if sold to be used as a residence whether to do that or not is a policy choice for the council but that's what's proposed. So
are you saying we could make that motion tonight
No, the council can direct tonight if the council wants staff to draft the documents to make that change and come back to the planning commission of the Council through the process. Nothing final can be decided tonight.
Okay, so can we now direct staff to do just that? We still have
comments. Next we have Council Member Whitman then Council Member Lange then Commissioner Murphy
All right, so how many current residences are we talking about in that area?
I'm going to see if Megan knows off the top of her head. I see the chart but i don't think i want to risk counting it that quick.
I do not know off the top.
Okay and then so we don't know how many... We don't know how many are actually being used as live works That that's one of my concerns about, you know. All all of this as we talk about VMU and live work and we've had that in existence for quite a while. But I don't have any idea how many. Of those units are actually being used? As a home and workplace, a lot of the traffic assumptions are based upon the idea that it's going to be somebody living and working in the same location. So my other question is I think Matt answered my question. So if a residence currently lives there, they can sell it as a non-conforming use that transfers to the new owner.
What can't be done is taking a commercial and selling it To then become a residential now what, what means are available to that potential purchaser. variants or of some
sort for that specific use? You cannot get a land-use variance. So, a variance can be used to vary development standards setbacks height pervious surface. Variance does not work per state law for land use so that buyer in that situation buying an existing commercial store and making it into a residence would have to apply for his own change and a general plan amendment okay
Next week, Councilmember like a chair closely might have an answer there so we'll be right with you.
Mr Whitman with that the, the 11 parcels that were involved in this area at least three of them are currently live work. Yeah, and I was gonna say just from say they're probably five or six that are pure residential from the one hotel.
Yeah, from the map on page 29 that that's about what we counted to give her take one. There's a map on page 29 that shows those those units as well. Um, but and then just to the 1 point that I just wanted to add is, um. The other issues and Matt can correct me if I'm wrong, but if the use is abandoned, which means not used for 6 months. 180 days yep then you lose the use too so potentially that that could actually stop somebody from from.
You
know, keeping the residential use and this is just to finish that point. If I may mayor the. Abandonment doesn't count if you have somebody with an active building permit. So, if you buy a residence and then rehab it and that takes longer than six months, you're okay as long as you've maintained an active building permit and all the necessary permits and approvals for the in this example of the addition or something but if you buy property let it sit wait seven months then you lose that non-conforming status and then you're only allowed to use it for whatever that zone allows here only the things allowed in C1
Thank you. Next we have Council Member Lange and then Commissioner Murphy.
Thank you. One question I had, I'm aware of a couple of businesses that have had difficulty with noise and the noise of their businesses affecting other residents and therefore having limitations to their commercial use. And I'm wondering how a change in zoning might affect some of those business owners? Like would this actually assist them in being able to, you know, stay open and to the at the hours that they want to be. They want to stay open or to have the kind of events that they want to have and things like that.
1:20 – 1:3233 turns
Yeah, we were just trying to kind of huddle up on that. The issues that I'm aware of our noise ordinance related in that. Well there is the, there's a different residential standard versus business standard and VMU is considered a business or is in the business category so potentially the noise standard would would change a little bit and might allow them to do a little Or be it I think it's something like debt 10 decibel difference between the residential and business standards. So, there's potentially that but the reality is when the business was going to do that activity they probably come in have to come in for a conditional use permit I think that's actually the case with the business that Councilmember langs referring to.
And when there's when the conditional use permit comes in the city is able to condition it as they desire been done.
Okay, thank you. Thanks Commissioner Murphy.
Could you elaborate just a bit on what the transformational changes that were discussed at that meeting? What do you consider transformational?
Yeah, I think that it was actually just we when we asked people what they wanted to see. That was a category no change some change transformational change and so it's just you know from people's perspective and I'll give I think Brian is actually probably a better example where you could see what a no change policy would look like, what some change might look like or transformational change which would change the whole feel of Bryant Street. On Montgomery it's harder to identify but 27% of people said that they envisioned transformational change which was a higher number than I expected. I actually essentially told the team no one in Ojai is ever going to ask for transformational change take it off the survey We ended up getting 27% so, but it wasn't discussed like there was no specific.
Like here's what transformational change would be
okay Commissioner Stark weather.
Uh, when you mentioned work live in a VMU. It's not that it's all work live it's it's work. It's live and its workload is that correct? Okay I just want to be sure as far as I just want to clarify tonight we're only talking about the land use plan. We're not talking about zoning. So we don't get confused about those two. Yep, that's the next stage and the third one was the noise on this I wanted to Lucas could clarify this my recollection recollection in the existing situation we had on that street without mentioning names. We applied the commercial noise Ordinance to the business, even though it was next to two residences. Is that correct?
Was it yes because it was a difference. It was a difference. Yeah.
Okay. Anybody else on this particular section chair closely
another one other question and this is on a chart that we didn't go through but this is chart 25 talks about projected growth Page 25 of attachment B.
And
it speaks to employment expected to be relatively flat with shifts in type Something that I think is coming soon here under the transportation thing, but we have analysis in here that says if we change for example from C1 to VMU in this area that suddenly the construction workers are all going to go away and everyone's going to become an arts and entertainment Employee of some sort.
That's in the ITARIS report that is attachment A in this book, and I'd like to understand if the traffic analysis That is being used to provide policy options here, is that reflected in the I terrace report. Because I still don't understand how construction people become arts and entertainment people. And the various other changes that are shown in that other report. If that is not relevant to the decisions that we're going to make here, then let's not worry about it. But if in fact we're basing decisions or option choices on what I think is flawed assumptions and analysis, then we need to go back and look at that.
Thank you, Mayor.
Mayor real quickly I completely agree with chair policy on that that was one of the concerns that I had about that report as well.
Thanks James Yeah and I think the clarification what does that mean arts and entertainment
Yeah, I was going to suggest and it's up to everybody. But I do think it's sort of relevant to maybe understand how those analyses were done before we dig too far, too much further. So we do have one of the speakers, Sean from iTerris, I think is I think he's also on Zoom if we wanted to ask him to maybe just start with sort of a high level overview of an explanation of how that those numbers were developed.
So,
sure. I think it's broadly that memo is a mix of how in the future we would analyze under the general plan EIR how you'd accommodate these land use options and the way the travel modeling works is It measures people, not land use. So you're having to take land use decisions and transform them into workers or residents and them having different types of travel characteristics.
And so that was an attempt to sort of look at how we would use the tools to forecast Potential changes in land use policy options that would sort of filter into the travel analysis. It doesn't actually have any reflection on the results that are shown today, in terms of forecasted changes to traffic on Ojai Avenue or Maricopa Highway at all. It's really sort of a down-the-road modeling exercise. I don't know if More confusing, but it's the intent was our tool is forecasted on a regional level by Southern California Association of Governments. And they have their own forecast for what would occur in the city of Ojai in terms of long-term growth which working with city staff we all agree that It was not a very good reflection of what is currently proposed in the general plan at all.
So that's sort of that modification to what they were forecasting based on trends within the city and these policy option areas.
So, if I could just add to that because I think that last part was key. Because we got a lot of questions about the terrorist study and a lot of them boil down to you. We have to start with the states projections. So when we talk about SCAG projections, what that is is we have the state projections and then SCAG which is to the Southern California section then took those and broke them down across the Southern California region. And they gave Ojai their share and Ventura their share and Oxnard their share and all the different agencies. So almost everything in the ITARIS report as far as projections goes comes from those projections which I'll be the first to say I hear constantly that nobody agrees with those projections but those are the state projections that they're requiring us to, to meet and that we have to use to do the analysis.
And I saw like the headline in the paper today and I'll just make this point talked about the city planning for 159 units over the next 25 years where that comes from is the state Give us a 53 unit allocation over the next eight years. So if you get to 25 years, you have to multiply that by three so it's 159. 159 units. And so I've gotten a lot of questions of why, where did that number come from? Why did we use that number? What did we base it on? It's the state allocation to us what we expect it to be over the next 25 years and these, I think Sean, the very simple explanation is all of these numbers derived from those state allocations which have now gone through SCAG that have been allocated to us.
Thank you James. Thank you Sean. Next we have Commissioner Starkweather
So the skeg projections we don't have those the details in this report from what I'm looking at.
This is a terrorist taking those and then putting them into so
when we have no idea how that got converted it seems like we're doing. Employment projections backwards, we're determining employment projections and how people are deciding the land use is going to be. That's not the way I've normally seen employment projections. They look at what's likely to be the types of employment a place like this might be able to attract or people would expand. We seem to be deciding our employment projections that we're gonna change the land use and therefore we're gonna get Uh, this increase in professional and retail and arts and entertainment workers.
I just find that a little troubling 1 to 1 number 2. Has the chamber of commerce had any role in. And evaluating this because there are group that. Supposedly trying to diversify employment and so forth. And they've been any discussion about this because it just seems. Like arbitrary to me.
They have not, and then I think the simple answer I give you is the whole process of the state giving allocations is backwards. So like, I think we've all kind of agreed on that and it doesn't really make any logical sense in reality. It's just allocations from the state. So I wouldn't argue with you but we sort of have to work backwards because that's how the state's process works.
And just to clarify, those allocations are indiscriminate not discriminant. Correct?
Yes, I don't know that I understand this
well it's it's arbitrary yeah
yeah I think I would call it that I'm sure Skagg would try to defend it in some way but I think that's fair all
right if you can just come through the chair because we do have a queue next we have a counselor Commissioner Trent and then Council Member Whitman
So on
Attachment A, page 3 of 14, they talk about how they came up with the 159 units. So they basically took the 53 that they allocated for this round in the RHNA cycle every eight years they have the RHNA cycle so basically they took that 53 and they just multiplied it by three And that's 24 years projected into the future. That's where the 159 comes from. So to your point, It is arbitrary.
Exactly,
exactly. Plus we
had 300 before.
Right right in the next cycle we could have 300 or we could have 20 or you know so it's we're making a projection based on what we have now.
Okay Council Member Rule has a clarifying
question. Yeah that was my clarifying question is basically last year I mean last cycle we were at 350 this cycle we're at 53 next cycle we could be at whatever it decides whatever the state And just to clarify these laws go through 2025 confirmed.
1:33 – 1:4023 turns
The, I mean the legislature's continuously rewriting the arena statute process. Yeah, our current arenas process that were housing element that was approved by the council and is presently awaiting a review and certification is from 22 through 2021 through 2020 21 through 2029. So we won't have to do another housing element until 2029, but assuming the state doesn't make a massive blow it all up change.
If what's expected is a whole bunch of changes on how the arena process works those will come into effect with our next arena cycle starting in 2030 through eight years after that. But all that said I have no guarantees the legislature doesn't do what they do.
Okay, we Councilmember Whitman and then Commissioner Murphy. Yep.
Okay I've got a couple of big picture questions. Um, I don't know how much they'll impact Montgomery but so we have an existing general plan. And I understand the process we're doing is an update does that mean that we're adding To the existing general plan and. The things that are in there now will stay the same unless we specifically direct them to be changed, or is there going to be inner Linear put into things that are in there because they're?
Being impacted by what we might be doing in, you know these specific areas were addressing.
Yeah. That slide that Ron showed which was in the packet attachment be page six. It shows our current general plan elements and the years that they were. Adopted, and then what the items the elements that are a focus of this update. And so the, what we're going to do is essentially rewrite these five elements that are the focus of this update the land use element circulation element safety element environmental justice element and housing element.
Ones that we aren't doing the focused update on, for example noise element will be adjusted based on what needs to be adjusted from these updates but they won't be completely rewritten. So the ones that will be completely rewritten are those ones that we've called out as the focus items.
So will we be getting like a track change Version of the general plan at some point so we can see if things have been removed that we would want to keep in or
better,
are we going to get that type of feedback so that we can see. So what's disappearing and what's coming in? In a nutshell,
the proposal is for the five elements on the table. It's a completely new document. Yeah, it's not interleaved red lines. It''s not add this paragraph keep that paragraph it's completely new document for those five elements housing land use circulation safety environmental justice. And the housing element, the housing was a red line thank you. The other four are completely new documents and then the rest of the general plan that will be redlined to reflect those changes based on whatever policy comes out of the main five.
That's what's proposed through the current process per the prior Council's direction whether to do that or not is of course policy choice. Are you sorry,
Commissioner Murphy's next and then
follow up related question is so how does the housing element which has been at least I think from our standpoint finalized. We remains to be seen what HCD tells us about that. How does that play in. To all of
this, we adopted that first and partially because that one actually had a. Deadline, that's not really the right word but the last housing element was 2014 to 2021 and we needed to adopt a new housing element and get it into compliance. And all cities had the same complaint about you know having to put our most city they had the same complaint about having to put the cart before the horse and having to do that before the other items so we have planned from the beginning that as we go through the general plan update there may be revisions to the housing element based on The, how the rest of the update develops.
So that that's always a possibility that we end up having some updates you know a year or two down the road. So,
Okay, Commissioner Murphy and then Councilmember rule.
I just like to make the point that those arena numbers have been a goal. They are not a projection of real growth. So the document here is the iterative system, how do you say it? Iteris. Is basing numbers on a hope or goal and not what is really going to happen in Ojai. Is that-
I think it's fair.
That's fair.
Yeah.
Okay.
But isn't there a pretty strong movement at the state level that they're going
to
change that from a goal to a mandatory compliance, it feels like that. I think that's coming
in that direction
Councilmember rule and then Commissioner Trent.
I kind of wanted to bring it back specifically to Montgomery, and that block that we're talking about. And if we could get with specific numbers like what do we have now of each. And what would us approving a village mixed use. It's one block. I just so, so, I mean it's a great theoretical discussion, but that is a charming block and I would just like to know the numbers get specific and and figure out you know When we talk about, you know traffic. Okay if we're talking about four conceivable units or stores what are we talking about in traffic? I mean we're not talking about a 20 page you know traffic survey like what are we really talking about here in one block? If I could get that that would be really helpful.
1:40 – 1:5038 turns
I'd like to see that also.
Any such information will go to everyone
Well, it might be here. I
don't know.
We have it but not here physically so might lean to the idea of you know kind of having a two-parter discussion but we can provide it to the group after or following the meeting.
Yeah my hope was that we could move forward not come back to talk about a block but okay.
One thought would be the idea is to get general direction tonight, and then when we come back and bring back with the you know the sort of. Bring that back yeah I can't bring it back with information.
Okay, thank you. Yes, thank Commissioner Trent.
Oh,
I'll save it
for
any other comments or questions on this section.
So, so did we give you the general direction to make sure that we can that makes Ojai House and other business places where people now live and become legal.
I haven't heard general direction yet.
That's
my that's, that's one option.
How do we make motion what we would need a motion on the table but we do have a motion on the table comes number Langs motion, and it has a second
Okay, so
I'm not to not make any motions until the end of the. Yeah, and then make and then the 1, the motion
is we have a motion on the table. So let's do a substitute motion.
Maybe she would like to withdraw that motion till we're done with this segment.
Well, I think it pertains to all the segments.
I know.
If I could, I would withdraw that motion to make an exception for this because it sounds to me like right now with this new information or knowing that That it's not zoned for mixed use, that it seems to me that it would harm the businesses that are already in existence not to proceed with moving forward in this way. Is that correct?
And would you like to return to your motion at the end of the presentation. Do you want to make a motion. Yes, I
might need help wording it, but we have Meg in the audience she's been patiently waiting three years. So what wording do we need so that she can
be something like motion to direct staff and the team to
Yeah,
go
ahead. Draft the necessary documents to amend the general plan land use designation for the Montgomery Street area north of Aliso to be Village Mixed Use and make other clarifying changes.
Yes that's my motion.
Okay do we have a second? Second. Okay roll call please Weston.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. Okay do we have a second? Second. Okay roll call · 1 under review
Show transcript
Okay, thank you very much. All right we will move on to the second section. Thank
you Rachel. It is a big decision.
All righty, so the next section is the CM area in the Bryant Industrial Area. And the CM area refers to the area with the current general plan land use designation of commercial manufacturing. So you can see that gray area outlined in the second image. Currently the mix of land uses in this area it's retail office, institutional public industrial uses You can see the distribution of land uses in the map, the first map in the center on the top.
The scale
of buildings
is mostly like one to two stories up to 35 feet is currently allowed and currently today unlike Montgomery Street, the existing land use mix is generally consistent with what is permitted under general plan. The current general plan designation as well as zoning district for this area. Next slide. So again, this was an area we had heard about in the beginning stages of this process people envisioned some sort of change in this area And we use this Alternatives Workshop to understand exactly what type of change people wanted to see.
So, we brought a couple questions to the community. We asked if new non-residential uses should be permitted in this area, the light gray CM area? Now, currently a mix of non-residential uses is currently allowed. We can go into exactly what uses we're talking about in a moment but we wanted to see if people would be supportive of expanding the allowed range of uses in this area and then as a follow up question, we asked again about the appropriate types of non residential uses they'd like to see in this area So there were a couple options that people could choose from, offices, restaurants, education, public uses or even selecting other.
And we found that there was interest from the community in seeing research and development uses, office uses and creative uses like art galleries and studios. Currently some of these uses are not allowed in this area or only allowed conditionally. And many participants were especially supportive of creative uses, but one big thing we heard is that this is the industrial area of the city. So a lot of people were concerned about making sure that industrial uses can continue in this area and are able to thrive in this area. Next slide.
We also asked if residential use should be permitted in this area. You'll see Next to the gray area, there's a light pink area. And there are currently some residential uses in that area and the area joining the commercial manufacturing area. And again, the idea of residential was something that people had proposed during workshops at the beginning stages of the project.
But when we asked this question about two thirds of respondents said that residential uses should not be allowed for those who responded yes to this question that they'd like to see residential uses About 88% of those participants supported live-work housing types and 65% supported affordable housing on certain SPL overlay sites. So with this input, we formulated two policy options for you to consider for this area First option is related to non-residential uses.
And there's options to expand the breadth of non-residential uses that are allowed in the CN area. So some uses that can be permitted, sorry would be able to be permitted are listed here on this slide and I do have more details on the next slide about these uses. And again these are options that are either not permitted or only conditionally permitted. These are options that were supported by the community during online engagement and at the community workshop, and also can complement the existing mix of office and industrial uses in this area.
The next option for you to consider is... Go back one please. The next option to consider would be conditionally allowing live-work housing units. Again, this would be supportive of the creative uses that people were generally supportive of in this area. Housing would not be allowed outright though. These live work uses would be conditionally permitted and they could complement the emergence of creative uses along this corridor.
Now, there are a couple questions for you to think about here. So first when we get to the policy stage of general plan development, we will have to think a bit more about industrial land use compatibility and if housing were allowed, we'd have to think more about ensuring that potential live-work uses would be able to thrive and people would be able to be healthy in this area of industrial uses.
And then again, another thing if we do changes general plan land uses this would require updates to the zoning code. Now next slide. So this slide here, which I believe is my last in the section. This provides a little bit more detail on potential uses non residential uses that could be allowed in the CM area and the current status. So art galleries for instance it's not currently permitted, and we've also listed some uses in the city where these uses are permitted for comparison.
And again we came up with the solicited uses based on you know what the community provided feedback on, what we heard from people and engagement. Also just by looking through the zoning code and also just by it by um you know using our experience developing general plans and thinking about creative industrial districts or industrial districts in general and what type of uses are allowed in other cities in these types of areas so that Next slide I will turn it over to discussion again.
Thank you, Megan. Any questions or comments on this section Commissioner Murphy and then chair closely.
1:50 – 2:0117 turns
I am very concerned about the prospect of having These non residential but live work, kind of applications in an industrial zone. We have a very limited amount of space in our town where we can have industrial And if we fill them up with coffee, if we fill that space with coffee shops or whatever. We will have no opportunities to bring in industrial businesses that could give us some serious employment.
So that's my overriding concern over this whole
Chair Kelsey and then Councilmember women,
and Betsy I'll be after.
Okay.
Okay, two or three points we have currently, if we could bring that map back up to show the detail of the area. There are on the east side of South Fulton, there are in amongst the industrial parcels. There are some residences now. These are people who's who are currently legal nonconforming as residents. They're in the same position as the people we were talking about on North Montgomery that if The residents were not used for six months, and then someone comes in and wants to reuse the residence they won't be allowed to because the zoning and the land use does not permit it.
That's one. Two, residential may not nominally be allowed in CM districts But the SPL overlay seems to trump the basic zoning wherever you go in this city. And there's a two-acre parcel that we don't need to talk about tonight, but it's along Bryant Street and it's going to be proposed as residential units and I don't see how that squares with this stuff that we're going through right now Third, it says this is on page 36 which we just saw conditionally allow live work housing for artists.
Is it the council's intent if it decides to allow live work housing in this area to limit it to people based on their profession? Just an open question,
not my intent.
Next we have Councilmember Whitman and then Councilmember Lang.
So I was on planning when they went through the process of creating the Brian zone. And I do recall, actually, we did one of these before council adopted that we did a lot of meetings leading up to that and one There are a couple of big issues that were pushed, and one was that we had to have a place that did not have residents so that we gave the potential for industry to thrive in that area.
So that was a driving principle of creating that zone. The other part of it, and I don't know that this still is operative or in existence but it was felt to be very important at the time There was a program environmental impact report, which meant that industrial commercial uses had a streamlined way of getting approved without having to go through the environmental impact report because of all the conditions that were created. Now I don't know if We've effectively done away with environmental impact reports now because it's been a while since I've seen one required on a project,
but we're just talking about that the brand when you mentioned in particular we are not familiar with. I don't think that's something that's still in practice special plan.
And I'll note that it does, it's still on the books but we haven't had an applicant and many many years he sought to fear off of that programmatic er. If somebody showed up tomorrow and tried to tear off of it, we would look at that as an option. Although 1 challenge is the longer you get in time from a programmatic adoption. The less consistent it is with sequence it reads that day and somewhere in there is a not fine line array.
Not hard line about when a programmatic EIR is too old to use. If an applicant showed up tomorrow seeking to improve some sort of industrial use, we would first assess the CEQA question based on what they're proposing. Is it exempt or not? If not exempt then the next step would be look at the programmatic EIR and if that would work based on whatever that particular use is.
And further the council could direct as a policy matter that the EIR that will be done for this general plan update could serve as a new programmatic EIR for those uses.
So my concern would be that the more we change the zone and the uses in the zone, the less likely that that program EIR that they put so much effort into would be likely to be sufficient or applicable I guess, I have a general thought that with the project that we can't specifically talk about. I think that we need to see what happens with that project before we think about making more changes to that zone.
And that's my general question.
Next we have Commissioner, I know I'm sorry Council Member Lange and then Commissioner Bennett.
Yeah thank you um one so i had two concerns about that um about uh that property and one is and this is where the jobs numbers came into play for me. You know I think If we are going to take away the manufacturing and light industrial use zoning, then we lose out on potential for economic diversity. And that is something that I think this is one of the few remaining light industrial zoned areas in the valley. And so I think that there is potential there For having businesses come in that would have higher paying jobs union workers, those kinds of things. And so I'd be concerned about limiting our choices for the future. Let's say if tourism started to decline and we were looking for other solutions. And then the other piece that I wanted to bring in too is, you know, we talk about environmental justice and if we are going to have residents with With light industrial or manufacturing, I think there could be and we're talking about low income.
And I know we're not going to be talking about any specific properties but if we're talking about affordable housing in an industrial area, I think that really calls into question an environmental justice piece of this conversation too. And finally, just one more thing. You know I have a family of artists and sculptors and so I know that actually some artists work like manufacturers and work with metals and welding and all kinds of toxic substances. So I actually think that an artist space or artist studio space would be appropriate in that area because loud noises, toxic substances, I think that would be something that I would be open to.
Next we have Commissioner Bennett, I just want to echo the commissioner Murphy's concerns about maintaining our industrial area because that's all we have in Ojai and the 4.3 square miles that's it. And it's really important to support people who meet need to make some noise mechanics welders, etc etc and if we get rid of that then it's gone forever. So, Commissioner Bennett and then we have Councilmember rule, and then commissioners dark
weather. People who want to make noise, give off odors and have toxic materials. Once those areas have residents in them you'll have voters in them. And all of a sudden whoever represents that district has got a voter who can come in and stand at the microphone on the city council meeting and say this is my neighborhood I live here And, you know, I think you are messing with my hair and I don't like backup alarms at four in the morning.
I think that I think the mayor's point is a good 1 and that is. Once it's gone, it's gone. And strangely enough here we have to concern ourselves with introducing democracy into an industrial area because once you've done that, it'll be a residential area before you know it because those people are going to want to be heard and they're going Fair fairness in terms of air quality and noise, and all the rest of the things that everyone else wants to have in their neighborhood. So I think that it's very important to tread lightly. And when we moved here many years ago, economic development was sort of the big issue. And it was probably at the time It was created, the Bryant Circle area was created as an industrial use.
And you know right now we want housing so all of a sudden it's like well let's take this underutilized piece of property and turn into housing. Well again I think when it's gone it's gone and I think it's very important to keep it It's current use
that council member rule and then Commissioner Stark weather and then Council Member Whitman. I'm fine, my question has been answered Thank you. Okay, a commissioner start by
the thing on here.
2:01 – 2:0710 turns
I assume when we're talking about keeping this commercial industrial time but heavy industry. Because there's plenty of communities that mix all kinds of uses with light industry that are not toxic and so forth. A lot of artists do sort of manufacturing, actually. And so I'm a little confused about that separation. My other question is if we're going to try to get industries... When was the last time we had an industry that came in there? Do we have any idea?
It seems pretty empty. I've been there lots of times. My question is, if you're going to get industry all the people I know that would want to do like startup manufacturing companies are going to need workers and usually going to need young workers and maybe talented workers so i think that raises the question of where these people are gonna live? Which I don't think at the moment we have places for them to live so if we're going to act, and we don't really have a strategy with the chamber and with the city for actually promoting industry out there that I've ever seen since I've been here.
So I guess those would be my concerns. Thank
you. Member Whitman,
and then Betsy, and then Mayor after what Councilmember Whitman I'd like to say something.
Yeah, so I just wanted to add. Commissioner Bennett's comments led me to recall that there was quite a bit of discussion of the need for economic diversity in the community Um, that we had to have different types of jobs and that this zone was going to be important to that goal. I recall that there was a lot of discussion about, um, A campaign to bring those businesses, but I don't recall that ever Happening. So I think the point that commissioner Stark weather made is a, is a valuable one, but I would orient it towards the idea that we created this zone about 15 years ago and uh, we need to give it the full potential benefit that what, that it was intended for and we should be Promoting, if we have to bring a specialist in to help us promote bringing businesses.
I have to believe that a startup business would like to be able to advertise to their employees will give you a high paying job in Ojai. And I think that would be attractive at least to some businesses and to the employment, and so we need to publicize the idea that that and promote the idea that that opportunity is available.
Can I just so first we have Commissioner Murphy and then we can have, just to clarify. Okay. Pardon me. Oh, yeah, she was Thank you. Thanks. And just to clarify one of the main goals that we gave the, the Chamber of Commerce several years ago was to diversify the economy correct.
Yes.
Okay. All right. Next we have commission. I'm sorry Councilmember Lang and then we have Commissioner Murphy and then Councilmember
Yes, I wanted to speak on this actually. I've been actively working with Jamie Fleming on strategizing economic diversity ideas and options and I'm also on the Economic Development Collaborative For Ventura County, and so this is something that I'm deeply passionate about and that I have been looking at. And so I don't have any efforts that have gone as far as I can report but knowing that there is all of this incredible property and there are opportunities there This is this is something that excites me, you know, in thinking about how to how to build our economy.
And the other thing, too, is I just want to speak to Commissioner Starkweather's comment about jobs and housing and housing and jobs. And this kind of reminds me of the which which comes first, the chicken or the egg if we don't have Housing, if we don't have jobs. We can't attract people who you know to live to fill housing and and if we build houses without opportunities or without activities for people to do the more increasing traffic outside of our community and so we're bringing money out of the community. And so I think that you know one of the things that These conversations are helpful for is really thinking about a holistic plan. So it's not just how do we build houses and address this need, but it's how do we see the vision for the entire community?
Commissioner Murphy and then Council Member Ruhl.
I just have a quick legal question, do the SPL overlay sites trump anything that we are going to do to this area whether we keep the zoning as is or change it?
2:07 – 2:1312 turns
The question is just does the existing SPL overlay zone a special housing overlay zone. Is that modified in any way by these proposed changes and the answer is no, the existing Special Housing Overlay Zone as adopted by the City Council, and most recently readopted with a new housing element and the related zoning changes zoning preservation that remains in place.
So these changes do not change those sounds. The council can separately changed that but that's a very different conversation.
Yeah, so
I never got a chance to speak. I had my hand up first.
You go, Susan.
I can wait till after you. Okay, so I just want to address a couple of things. Rachel and anyone else Okay, for anyone who is new on the council I think it's really important that you look at the business. We've lost huge businesses and you should find out why we lost lynda.com, Altura Coffee, what was that other taping where so many businesses...we had a huge ITI yeah So it's no use bringing in new people if we're only to lose them when they are successful. And that's the pattern that we've had, you know I don't know if that's fair. That's not maybe not the whole analysis but there has been a pattern of losing businesses when they become successful and they outgrow Ojai. And to your other point, we already have a lack of housing and Can't say the chicken or the egg.
It's a fact that we have people commuting into Ojai already because there is no housing and we need data on that, you know? So okay so that point and then I had a smaller question how How come it says that on page 36, attachment B, permit new non-residential uses? We already have multiple dance, martial arts, health and fitness facilities in that zone. And I don't even remember when I had one that we ever got a conditional use permit. Maybe we were illegal but we had... What?
Oh you predated it.
Predated it. Okay, but so what's the explanation? Why is it saying new windows already exist in that zone?
The help. So the next page after that on page 37 shows the current status of what's allowed and what's not allowed. And so for example you're talking about the health and fitness facilities right now those are conditionally allowed but not automatically permitted And then art galleries are not permitted right now. Art antique collectible and gift sales, not permitted. Plant nurseries, garden supply stores, not permitted.
Live work, not permitted. Medical services conditionally permitted. So somebody right now can get a, I believe can get a CUP, a conditional use permit to have a health fitness facility but it's not permitted by right.
Okay, I do understand that but why is that?
It's just the current zoning. The current, yeah. Yeah and so part of you know going back to sort of what we talked about with Montgomery is like some of what we were looking to do was try to make sure that we're matching reality and what sort of evolved over time and what's happened but you know the sort of the key question I think everybody hit on here today is like The real question as far as allowing just residential uses in that area, not related to the SPL overlay because that is there and so that is what it is. And it's not part of this discussion but allowing more residential uses in that area.
The obvious question becomes how compatible is that with the other uses that are happening there? I think when we look at health fitness facilities, you don't really see a compatibility issue. It's it's pretty compatible and I think that's why then going back a couple more slides. That's why 66% of people I think it was said sure let these other residents are these other business uses in.
But then there was 66% of people who had concerns about allowing the whole Bryant industrial area to become residential. So I think that's sort of the basic question.
OK, so my comment is, I think there's quite a few derelict abandoned buildings, especially at the beginning. Why are those buildings? Can we find out what the problem is? Can we contact the owners? Why are those buildings just sitting there year after year?
I would say. Respectfully, I think it's sort of out of the scope of this conversation. So the city has a vacant building program. And so if there's complaints or concerns about a building being abandoned people can report it and we'll do code enforcement on it. But I think for today, and I expect yeah 815 and we saw a few items, I don't think we want to get into the code enforcement program.
2:13 – 2:2436 turns
Yeah, if I could add to that very briefly. The reason though many of those buildings are vacant in like high, high level sum the property owners have found it more advantageous to keep them vacant than to find a tenant who's willing to rent or a buyer who's willing to sell. I don't know the specifics of each of the properties and we're not gonna go through that right now but they've made the choice to leave their land fallow finding that better than finding a tenant or then renting it and the question for the council and the commission to consider as a policy question is would changing the mix of allowed land uses Help drive the property owners to find a way to put it to productive use or not.
And as part of a different conversation, the council could also consider strengthening or adjusting the vacancy building ordinance and the vacancy programs. And that would be not on tonight's agenda but that's the second broader question. But it's sort of what drives the property owner leave land fallow? They think it's better for them for whatever reason Can you change that conversation or change their calculus by changing the loud land uses, that's the policy question.
Next we have Councilmember rule.
That's very important. We can't just drop that we were supposed to give direction and it seems with our housing shortage. To have these buildings sitting there, maybe the... How do we investigate that? Maybe the owners don't know that they could change it to residential if we decide to do that. It just-
If the council decides to allow that right now, the zoning does not allow residential except for the SPL overlay zone sites.
So which is beyond the scope of this conversation at this point.
The question is whether the council wants to adjust The zoning to allow the proposed land uses and allow live work that's sort of nice discussion.
Okay, well I would at what point do we tell you what we want.
Susan, so if I understand what you're saying is you're saying that there are vacant houses in this particular area that we're talking vacant buildings and that they should come into this conversation because it's relevant to how we decide what this zoning should be or something to that effect.
Something to the effect okay yeah
so
our chance to give direction
Right, okay. I just wanted to make sure that we all understood that so i'm trying to figure this out. I go down there often there's no businesses really there's three storage there's you know a detailer in the parking lot um you know it looks a little bit abandoned, I have to say. And it's my, my district right and that's where I store my stuff. Right. And so, but but likewise we, we have no.
We are at a shortage of places for housing, even if we do infill. So, um. It seems to me we don't have, we're trying to seed an industry, light industry there. We also need to have places for housing and any businesses that we do seed there are going to need housing. I'm not in any way, I don't have a conclusion for this it just seems to me that an either or It is a little bit, it cuts off options. You know yes we can try to get you know businesses and industry down there but we haven't been successful. We've been successful the other way they leave and we need housing and there's a lot of people who you know I mean That live-work space is very appealing to a lot of people. That aesthetic is appealing to people, it's something you know especially to artists and those who work sort of with their hands so I'm just saying I don't know right here what is the right answer but especially since we're thinking for however many years we're thinking but we need to be realistic about bringing businesses in.
You know, so I'm going to leave it there is like, I don't know what I would not want to go one way or the other without some more thought
we have a chair policy then Councilmember Whitman then Commissioner Stark weather and then Commissioner Trent.
Thank you. Very briefly, in this meeting I'm presuming that any motions that are made seconded and voted on are done by members of the City Council not the Planning Commission correct? Correct. Then I would ask if whatever else we decide to do with the Bryant area could we pick out those purely residential parcels that exist right now on the east side of Fulton Street and make them VMU.
It doesn't keep them from having manufacturing or commercial business or live work in them, but right now we have those people in the same position as the purely residential parcels that are along North Montgomery. So could we fix that please?
So you're asking
the comments I'm saying, I can't make a motion I can't second. Just would one of you please
just to make clear I understand what you're asking, and I'm looking at this little tiny map but Fulton, there's homes on the residential on the West side of Fulton.
All of the West side of Fultons residential. There are some residents on the East side of Fulton. Please make those people legal conforming instead of legal non-conforming.
So merge those lots
with that zone next to the West.
Yes,
that's your proposal. That's my request. Okay.
Can you make a
motion? I think maybe the motions all come later but could we
do
that? Do you want to finish?
Yeah, I have a question. Is there just one overlay in the Bryant area or is there more than one? I'm running off memory on the map. I think it's just one. I remember one, yeah. Just one?
Mm-hmm.
Which
connects to Congress. It's a two-way overlay.
Okay.
And then my next question is if we're looking at Additional places for housing. I think we have to look at what we have now, you know, what's in, uh, what's line, you know, What's Raina compliant? Uh, in terms of, you know, and, and what are we going to need to do Um, in the future. And I mean, I've, I've always wondered is it an appropriate strategy to save properties for future Raina cycles? If you've got enough on your map today in terms of residential potential shouldn't you potentially say for a rainy day
Yeah, there's to sort of answer that. There's talk that the state moving forward is basically going to require cities to identify more sites in addition to what they've already identified. So I think that sort of answers your question where the sites that are already on our map, the next cycle the rumor is because they haven't said what they're going to do yet is that they'll say okay we already have those so now what additional sites are there.
And so that is uh we don't know yet but it's something we have to think about because one of the realities in Ojai is its 4.2 square miles and if they say we already accepted all these eventually we're gonna run out of So that's the rumor, we've had some discussions with League of California Cities and some other people who say that seems to be where it's going but we won't know until
they update their requirements and standards.
And the other thing I would add to that if I could is that in any conversation about amending an existing adopted housing element to put on the reserve bank a site Uh, that may raise some challenges with the Department of Housing and Community Development as they tend to look even under current regs let alone what may change with the laws. They look at your existing sites list as a bank and don't want to see withdrawals from it but that's a broader conversation that we can absolutely study if there's direction from the council to study it in return in the coming discussions regarding the housing element which will eventually return to the council once we have Sort of through each of these comments.
So there's an opportunity to have that conversation discussion in full beyond just tonight.
Yeah, and it wasn't my thought process that we would withdraw anything from that's been designated for addressing low income housing needs but it may be valuable to have places in mind for a future round
2:24 – 2:3452 turns
Okay, next finish. And can I just well we have we have Commissioner Stark weather and then Commissioner Trent. Do you want to go after them
after commissioners going to make a suggestion maybe we pull the housing element out of this discussion. It's not in this
point I was making of the nothing where we can do with this is going to change that exactly at this point so sort of thinking outside of that
okay all right Commissioner Stark whether and then Commissioner Trent
Okay, I just wanted to address economic development. I'm a big proponent and I served for 12 years on an economic development corporation that promoted the economic development. And I think we're putting the cart before the horse when we're talking about Promoting development and we have sites because normally you would want to do an economic analysis of what your strengths and weaknesses are, what you can attract. Often you look at regional patterns of potential that you could attract here. The example about that Suzu was bringing up Commissioner Francine excuse me, City Council member mayor. Sorry sorry that some of the industries because I've talked to people that knew about those industries leaving and what happened in a lot of them they started to need more employees and We didn't have housing for them, and it was easier for them to move to Ventura or some other place where those employees could find housing if they wanted to expand.
So they kind of reached the point where they could house the people they had, and then they wanted to expand, and they just didn't feel Ojai had enough employees or enough places for highly skilled employees who would want to live here. And also what we have on the ground now is essentially what the market is telling us we're getting So we're not exactly, you know getting those industries. So I think one of the things that I found very frustrating about this process was we had a SWOT analysis is what I've used before in economic development analysis is what your strengths weaknesses threats and opportunities are. I got it backwards but anyway we had supposedly one done by the consultants but he never actually outlined those four categories And that's really important, I think from a planning standpoint and a community standpoint.
So you can actually see what they listed were the strengths, what they listed were the weaknesses, what they listed were the opportunities. And so the City Council and the Planning Commission and the community can say well that's accurate we agree with that. So it becomes a starting point where everybody's agreeing what we're facing, but we don't have that. We have an 85 page, whatever long it is list of each of the types of analysis, but we don't have a summary and it seems like if we hire this consulting team to do that, we should get that as part of our contract. Thank
you. Commissioner Trent. I'll be quick.
This is just a point. So we've had this zone on Bryant Street for 15 years, I believe, right? So currently we have 2.4% of our jobs are in manufacturing. We have 29% in education, 30% leisure. So it's been there for 15 years but we still only have 2% in manufacturing. Something's not working there.
Any other comments on this section or questions? Well, is there
just not going to leave that hanging. Could you discuss that with Rachel and the chamber? Yeah yeah were you able to hear that what John Trent just said because it was a little hard to hear
yes I did hear what he said okay
and perhaps we could get report back from the chamber because that was one of the main goals
I will talk with Jamie about that and see if we can get some data about the companies here. And also, Susa to your previous point to do some investigating on what drove some of those companies to leave Ojai. And yeah, I'll do some more research on that.
Yeah, I'd be interested in seeing the data. For example, lynda.com moved to a much bigger venue. Yeah. So that makes sense. They just need more room.
A bigger house than OI allowed too.
Let's not go there. How big
of a house would you want? We have some gigantic ones here. It was much more than 10,000 square feet.
Commissioner, Commissioner Bennett. Let's not get personal. Commissioner Bennett,
just two quick observations. I recently toured to businesses in Bryant Street. Both of them make things one of them is a commercial bakery. And the other one is a coffee roasting company. So, where do you put that if you don't have Bryant Street and, you know, there's no question we have housing Problem but we also have an employment problem and we need the ability to have places where businesses can be put one of the, we have developed a thriving restaurant scene here now.
that wants things like good, fresh-made coffee that's made locally and good, fresh-made baked goods which are made locally. And we've got them on Bryant Street so...
And I would just like to echo that. I recently met a couple of gentlemen who manufacture equipment for surfing and scuba diving and that is really the only place they could do that. So we need to preserve that and invite other people who might be interested in doing that there
And one other example too, I'm sorry. Go ahead. One other example is Magic Hour you know it's a multi-million dollar business that employs people at a living wage and they have manufacturing operations there shipping distribution everything located within that area and even looking to expand so there are companies that are doing it and they are employers So I think there's a real opportunity there.
Any other comments or questions on this section?
And
I would, okay I would suggest we take a break pretty soon.
What about Chair Quillency's request? At what point do we address that? Separate
the residents from this. If we don't want residences in this zone then let's take the ones that are in it now and move them out
Okay,
is there on paper. Yeah,
make them VMU and he's saying to fix the zoning on the current residences okay is there so that they're not in the one
of
ours would that be loud. Is that, is that part of what we're doing here or should that come up by a different path it goes to planning and then City Council for to approve changing the zoning, I think independent from what we're
doing. That'd be useful direction to get because when we bring back our policy adjustments that would that could be tied into that okay so
right now you want yes
yeah just to clarify because i think people heard two different things um chair quillsey saying that the current houses that are classified as m1 should be correctly classified as bmu
Change them from legal non-conforming to legally conforming. Yeah, yeah okay is that like north?
So do we need a motion for that?
Yeah we need council direction on that one. We appreciate the commission conversation but when you count elected official direction on that one
uh Commissioner Murphy yeah
I guess i'm not sure I understand If we are able to move the boundary, make that Fulton Street VMU so that they become legal. But can't you just move the boundary of the CM? That's
all I'm suggesting.
They're mixed together. Those properties are currently zoned, correct me if I'm wrong, M1 Our MPD, M1. And so we would need to actually change the zoning of those properties to VMU.
And the general plan land use designation?
And the general
plan land, yeah thank you.
Would that go for the whole street?
That's a question for the council. Yeah I think what I hear... Do you want a checkerboard or do you want one line?
Is there um a council member who'd like to make a motion?
Well so I would like to make sure that one we're notifying People who could be impacted by it, so that they can provide their input. And then number two I'd like to see a map of what's being proposed before I would consider voting yes or no on moving a line I haven't seen.
So we can direct staff to get that information and then we'll come back
The council can make a motion to direct staff to prepare an analysis of adjusting the general plan land use designation and zoning for the residences that exist east of Fulton Street on Fulton Street to be shifted from M1 MPD. I'm sorry, M1 and CM2VMU and return for discussion of that. That would be it. I was moved to do exactly what you just said.
Okay, I'll second. Okay, could
we
could we have the roll call please Western.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 moved to do exactly what you just said. Okay, I'll second. Okay, could we could we have the roll call
Show transcript
2:34 – 2:3816 turns
there sticks.
Yes All right, thank you. We will take a
before we take a break if we're good so the underlying question still was Basically three options, no change permitting new non residential uses like art galleries etc. Or conditionally allowing live work housing. And so is there a decision on those or do we just want to do you know what's the process when it takes I think close out Brian
separate decision and we need to revisit Councilmember Langs motion at some point so
Wait a minute, wait. We will revisit Councilmember Lange's motion that's but what are you asking?
So the original question for Brian was do we keep it the same or do we change it and if we change it you know the vision of it I should say and if we're going to change the vision of it is it permitting not new non-residential uses Or is it even going further and conditionally allowing live work housing. And this is on attachment be page 36 those were the two options, obviously the third option on set is not changing anything.
Sort of the purpose of discussing Bryant was to get direction on which of those three paths
to take. And if I could just add there is always an unsaid fourth option which is returned for another discussion,
well
and revisiting not I know the staff doesn't want me to say that but yeah,
I know you don't, but revisiting Councilmember Lang's original motion was to take a little more time, do another workshop. And personally after hearing all the comments about this is our last or only industrial section so I think it's really important to get a lot of community feedback from people who are working there currently. So I would, I'm sorry James, I would advocate to wait on that Are you also
advocating that we have another workshop or how are you, how would you like to proceed that we get more information?
I would like to revisit Councilmember Lange's motion at the end of the third section which includes a workshop and then we'll vote on that.
As part of that, don't we want to give staff direction to investigate what's happening? Are we asking that we need to know more what's happening now and then are we personally going to go over there and check out the businesses. What are we proposing?
Do you, Council Member Lange do you want to? Yes.
I actually think finding more information. You know one, I am leaving this conversation with a number of questions. One why are businesses leaving? Why are there vacant? How many vacant properties are there and can we get a sense of why properties are vacant? And then I'd also just love more public feedback Thank you. Okay, everybody ready for a little break here so we'll come back in seven minutes?
Yeah.
2:47 – 2:5221 turns
Thank you. Quiet, please. And we will move on to the third section Councilmember Lang I just wanted to do you want to repeat your motion now and we can vote on it or do you want to? Yep.
Yes.
Okay. Do you want to repeat it,
please? Yes, um, just that we wouldn't that we would wouldn't make any decisions that we would workshop. I apologize, I have a COVID brain tonight that we would not make any major decisions on this until after we workshop it. And
so we have a motion and we have a second any comments from the council, specifically, I would, I would like to just add that. goals and versus the past council's goals. And there was the past council decided not to have any climate element in this general plan, and I think that doesn't really serve the council that is seated now. So I think that's a really important item that needs to get in there before we move on.
I saw listed. Climate was listed, it's in here.
Well the council and James and I talked about this earlier can you go back in history a little bit? So
climate element is not included um and anybody uh who was I think it was one of our meetings at the bowl A couple of years back during COVID, we had a couple meetings where the council discussed whether to include a climate element in the process. And ultimately I think, I don't remember the exact vote but it was voted not to have a climate element. They might've been a 3-2 vote.
And so I was asked earlier do we plan to have a climate element in this general plan update? And the answer right now is no unless the council revisits that decision.
And I think the climate element climate clearly needs to be woven into every element of our general plan at this point. And, and I think Councilmember Lang you also mentioned social justice, and we've already talked about economic diversity. So we have a motion, and we have a second. Could we get the roll call please? Can can we talk
a little bit about it? Sure go ahead. I would like more specificity on how we plan to move forward. I see this as a 10-year program and right now because everything is just well we'll workshop it. We're going to get rid of this, this, and this, and we're going to add this, this, and this So I'd like some specificity on how this is actually going to proceed.
You know, I don't want meetings till midnight every week. I really don't. So I want us to figure out how we're going to move forward, what we want and how we're gonna get that information you know?
Council
Member Panzina
It was already my understanding that we're not making any major decisions, but we're giving staff direction. And I don't want your motion to preclude that and we also aren't done so we don't know what comes next and maybe we will make a big decision. We don't know that yet. You know, we don t know. I want to support your motion. There's common sense to your motion, especially with the new council, but I still would like, I prefer to vote at the end of, at the end of all this.
Yeah, I mean, I think that giving my motion does not preclude us from having staff come back with recommendations or if there is something just like we did with the Montgomery property. If there is something that's really common sense to use your words decision that it doesn't preclude it. It just says that Before we have our consultants go back with other, with their marching orders so to speak. Then that we would workshop it within our within our own council.
Okay, we have a motion and we have a second group the roll call please Weston and then just
one more comment this is I understand that this was as far as adding residential which I don't know if that's what the issue is. 67% of the respondents said they do not want to change the residential or non-residential component to this cell.
OK, roll call please Weston.
That has nothing to do with the motion does it? Yeah. And that's
just to have a word for another
motion
is to have changing now we have it's the same motion.
2:53 – 3:0146 turns
I was trying to make sure we had the motion and I understand the motion is to, uh. Have another workshop, um, to get further feedback.
And I guess that's just what action on the other points on the table
and also build in. Um, I mean, the workshop building the climate component specifically. Ready on what we mean by have
a workshop, who are we talking a council workshop or are we talking a public workshop Are we talking.
I took it and so I'll say what I think and then the makers of the motion can correct me. I heard that the idea was wanting to get more community feedback, so I think I would take that as a workshop for the public not a council meeting, a workshop for the public. So we would schedule an additional workshop on these policy questions.
And specifically getting more diverse input at the workshop, younger people and now we can get people from Bryant Street who own businesses there for example. Okay so we have a motion, and we have a second
friendly amendment or is it understood that that would have to be on a Saturday morning and not at night. But we can't expect people to come at night, can we were that kind of workshop if we want diversity what younger councilmember Lang.
Yes, I agree with her that having it when a more diverse group of people could come.
I did, James you did tell me that we've had two workshops on Saturday and they were not well attended in the past so i mean
that's been my experience. The last council meeting we had on a Saturday we didn't have a single person attend
okay and for example the green coalition green coalitions workshop was very well attended, and that was on what day of the week,
Saturday.
Okay. All right. Okay, well we can serve. We could provide some good food anyway moving on so we can we get the roll call please we have a motion in a
second. So I need clarity so i'm just going to say it's the climate. I heard different things with the climate weaving it into all elements of the general plan is what we are currently doing. A separate climate element is Different. And so I need to understand that, and a separate climate element just to be clear would have costs are it would either have costs or we'd have to figure out how we're going to do it because typically it would have the reason one of the reasons why it wasn't added at the time when the council discussed it before is because it would have been additional scope on the contract. So,
in one approach will be to ask if the maker the motion second or concur direct staff to return with some cost estimates. For the options regarding a climate change or climate action plan or climate change resiliency element, which could include it as an additive item at some price, or as a replacement for some of the other work on the table. Options and prices, I'm assuming we can get that from the resultant options
yeah Councilmember Lang. Okay. As the maker of the motion does that sound good to you?
Yes, that sounds good to me.
Okay, Councilmember Whitman is the second. Okay,
I want to James you said something very important there my recollection is that the free that was, I think a three two vote. But my understanding was the justification was that we have that, that you did just now say that climate is considered in every element.
That's it's woven
in,
that's the idea. There is a fundamental debate, which I think is still the fundamental debate which is It's just the split of, I think some people feel like you create a separate climate element and it stands on its own that it's more effective or maybe more gives the message that the city is taking that issue more seriously versus the approach we chose to take at that time was building weaving it into all of the elements.
So that it was sort of built in, but then we don't have a climate element. You know, we aren't able to at the end of the day say we have a climate element.
Okay, but leaving it in seems the most important.
That's
the policy question.
Yeah, it's a policy question so let's vote and we can decide. Weston, can you do the roll call please? Wait a
minute I'm not ready to vote.
I'm not ready to vote. Are we voting that we're, we're not necessarily going to do it, we're voting first to see how much it costs?
Well the vote would be to have us come back with options. So, you know we got a bid and here's what it would cost or, you know, trying to think creatively of other ways we can do it.
Maybe I should restate the motion Madam Mayor.
Yeah.
As staff understands the motion is as follows. Take no action tonight, providing direction to staff on the other land use change points that were in the packet. No action on that, coupled with second item direction to staff to have another public workshop on all of these issues which would be held on a Saturday. With the goal of driving additional diverse turnout Third point, secure options and prices for adding a climate change resiliency element or climate action plan element as an additive item or as a replacement for other proposed work.
Securing options in prices three elements no further action tonight direction regarding an additional public workshop and adding a climate change resiliency element cost estimate to then come back to council for deciding whether to add that or not at that. That's how I understand the motion. I'll ask the maker if I could pass through the mayor to confirm
Council Member Lang. Yes, that is correct. Final comments before the vote? Council Member Ruhl? Yeah I'm not sure why we're...
We've gone through two of the three on land use and we haven't touched the others wouldn't it make more sense to go through the third on land use and see if by chance it is as Obvious, like to stop to do this now if we're going to continue on the final component of land use seems to me it would make more sense to do this at the end of land use rather than now since we haven't.
Delved into the 3rd component of land use and it's really possible that, you know, we won't be able to come to consensus but. We won't know that until we actually move forward so I would make a friendly. amendment that we wait until we've gone through the third component also because we might want to add additional things to that motion as we just had now have five things on this particular motion.
Council Member Lange? I would accept that amendment Okay, so the amendment is to wait correct until the third after
the third
segment.
Okay and then when we get to the motion unless there's a major change as we go through this last part I would separate those three elements because i'm in favor for sure of having another workshop at a time that we decide it's most convenient don't know about the other two
Are you making a friendly amendment?
Yes, I'm making a friendly amendment to separate the three elements.
Okay, Council Member Lange?
I would accept that
amendment.
Okay all right then we will move on to the third and final section.
Mayor, we never had a vote.
Oh well... The vote yeah okay
3:01 – 3:1010 turns
After the next section, vote on what to do with
it. If I could jump in very briefly Madam Mayor. My suggestion would be to take the presentation on the third section. Take any public comment that might be hanging out and then vote on the motion that's on the table. Unless the council directs otherwise.
Okay, thank you Matt. All right. Let's go take it away Ron please. So Megan,
Megan. Can we continue with the Ojai Avenue portion hopefully you're still there and haven't fallen.
Yes, I sure am. James can you pull up the presentation again please? Yeah. Then full screen. Right now you can see my notes. There you go. So our last section is the Ojai Avenue corridor, current land use mix there retail office institutional and public currently there are no residential uses along the Ojai Avenue corridor scales about one to two stories and the general plan land use for most of Ojai Avenue corridor is general commercial which is generally consistent with the uses on the ground, as is the zoning code. An important point to consider here is that we are looking at portions of the Ojai Avenue corridor that have this general commercial designation. We're not looking at the area in the downtown with the arcade that actually has a separate land use designation.
Next slide. So at the community workshop, we asked if residential uses should be allowed along the Ojai Avenue corridor. Again not in the downtown Arcadia area and just in areas with a general commercial designation. And if yes what type of housing use it should be permitted. About half of respondents said yes to allowing residential uses along the corridor. And then the recent citing where, you know, a need for more housing in the area and the benefits are creating more activity along the corridor. However there were concerns that people cited like traffic and parking impacts.
And then we asked people who said yes to this residential question what housing types are appropriate? About 74% of residents, not residents responded cited live work 65% affordable senior housing, and then about half supported multifamily units of about four units. So next slide we have an option for the Ojai Avenue corridor with the area with the general commercial designation. We have an option to create an Ojai Avenue housing overlay that would include allow housing as a conditional use.
COB, Erika Vandenbrande): This again this will not include the arcade area and i'll cover the geographic extent of this overlay in the next couple slides we have a couple different options there. COB, Erika Vandenbrande.: : And then under this overlay the scale housing allowed would be consistent with or could be consistent with our two so about 25 feet to stories.
And the reason why we're recommending the scale is because it's consistent in scale with existing buildings, as well as adjacent districts like the VMU and some of the other residential districts that allow housing adjacent to the general commercial district. Overlay would allow mixed housing types, so including kind of smaller scale multifamily types, mixed use as well as live work. And again there's considerations to think about zoning updates, parking mobility and just making sure that people on the corridor are able to get around and navigate easily. Next slide.
So here are the potential options for the extent of this overlay which are outlined in yellow in the three images In option one, the overlay would span the entire length of the general commercial area. In option two it would extend from about half mile from downtown and then in option three on the western side it would extend from half a mile from downtown but then on the eastern extent of the overlay would extend to further east in city limits to that edge of the existing general commercial area Next slide.
So you may be wondering why I consider limiting the extent of the Ojai Avenue housing overlay. Option two, again, limits the overlay to a half mile downtown. That's about like getting kind Additionally, we have learned through our existing conditions research and the SWOT analysis There are some sites in the area that we think could have potential over the next 25 years or so of redeveloping due to factors like assessed value, low floor ratio and just through identification of sites on the ground. So there are opportunities in this area for sites to redevelop and potentially turn into housing. And then again finally there's housing adjacent to these areas and like the VMU area and some The orange residential areas that you see on the map so it could be compatible with some of these surrounding uses.
And again option three, it extends the housing overlay a little bit further east along the corridor And really the rationale there is that there were other opportunity sites that could be potentially redeveloped over the general plan horizon within that area. So areas where, you know, there may be greater potential of housing actually being developed there if that option were given to property owners.
Next slide from here Ron's going to talk a little bit about traffic analysis findings
Thank you, Megan and actually it's good we have Sean here as well this evening if you have questions but this is kind of the bottom line slide so I terrace used the existing traffic model to run a traffic analysis of the impact of making all three of these sets of land use changes that be changed to VMU along Montgomery. the diversification of non-residential uses in Bryant, as well as the conditional allowance of live work in Bryant. As a conditional use through an overlay housing along Ojai Avenue and so considering if all those changes were made they ran the model to see how it would impact traffic and congestion in Ojai And what was really neat to find out is that it actually, because it better aligns future development with an efficient use of the circulation network.
It actually models that there would be less congestion if these changes were to be made. So on the left in the chart you have what the model predicts in terms of increases in traffic Through 2045, if the existing land uses remain the same you'd see about a 3.6% increase in traffic on Ojai and 0.7 on Maricopa. In contrast if the changes were made you'd actually see a reduced or less amount of increase in traffic on Ojia 2.5 to 3.2 percent as well as on Maricopa zero to point three.
And that's the synopsis, people have questions. The analysis, Sean is available.
Yeah and Ron I can just chime in real quick. That's the assumption here is that 159 units are in both of these scenarios. It's just a little more bent towards the growth, the potential change areas in the proposed land use change side of that. So it's the same number Housing units in each, it's just their location within the city that's different. And as Ron pointed out, that's because they're sort of closer to areas where there's more walking and biking and they're closer to services so there would be presumably fewer vehicle trips from those housing units.
Thank you, Sean. Sure, go ahead.
Sean, you mentioned the 115 units that's what we're basing the future growth on. Are you guys calculating what the population would be based on that housing increase and what density figure would you guys use?
Yes, I'll have to look back. There are average housing unit values. I think we used three persons per household. I have to check. We may have used different ones between multi-family and single family.
3:10 – 3:155 turns
Thank you, Sean. Commissioner Chair Quilleston.
Thank you as part of the background here for all of us around the table considering this please keep in mind there are currently two SPL sites on Ojai Avenue one is a portion of the school district property And the other is immediately adjacent to that, to the east. So there's already two good sized parcels where if somebody wants to put in affordable housing, there's nothing we can do about it. They're going to do that anyway in the general commercial area.
Just just remind we were going to finish public comment and then we'll move on to discussion and questions. Okay, so let's begin with Bill Miley, and then Kathy lattes, and then balance is bill still here.
Well, is this working? Yes. Okay, I decided to come back. So I started out with 10 comments and now I have seven. In reviewing the three options for housing overlay on Ojai Avenue, I choose number three It goes to Gridley. It's open, suitable for mixed use housing. I like that. Item two, housing types on Ojai Avenue because single family units and market rate are too expensive for most people.
At least 70% of single family houses should be deemed restricted affordable. And one of our guiding principles I just found out is housing variety. Item three, the beginning statement, the city 2045 general plan, the vision statement produced an ethical tweaking It says we're a mosaic of people, which we are. There's a bunch of pieces put together but the income levels in paragraph three, the term should be softened by adding most as many of our renters are in economic trouble and facing increasing rent burdens only the wealthy can afford to live here now so Also, we're not offering folks and families third paragraph equal access to services and opportunities.
An example the opportunity to buy or rent affordable housing in this town. We don't offer that now. We're participating in the workshops, you already heard about that. 44% of the people participated over 65. 25% of the population is over 65. I would suggest that a lot of what's in this plan is tinged with age attitudes and experiences and truly does not express what LA should be working towards in 2040.
Councilwoman Zelang's idea of workshops, Jeffrey Starkweather's idea of focus groups. But in order to do this it's going to take a lot of work. Stakeholder groups, ethnic groups, residential survey of everybody in the town. And that would be really best. It's going to take a lot of work, though. The travel modes in the plan show there's a lot of influx and outflux which means that we need affordable housing.
In summary on page 75 of 86 It talks about supporting our Fire Safety Council. We need to do that when the budget's coming up. And lastly, Complete Streets says vehicles need to be parked and people need to get out of them. It should be important to get the agreed upon parking study done. I would like to see a multi-level parking structure to limit single surface parking lots
Thank you, Bill. Thanks much appreciated. Kathy Lattes then Balance and then Carolyn Goldwasser.
3:15 – 3:216 turns
Let's see. I'd like to congratulate the, the people here on actually a pretty robust policy discussion so that was very, very positive, but I've worked for a long time, career in city planning. I was on the Planning Commission for a while when we were kind of the early part of the general plan up to last May and you know policies are people have said it but it's true policies are the most important part of this general plan And we have to be willing to put the effort into allowing community input on this.
At the very first workshop, well yeah it was a visioning workshop and the results were written up in the December 2020 results study that's in your packet oh I'm it may not be in your packet I think it's on the city's website under And that visioning workshop was pretty well attended. I think it was about the most well-attended of anything. Important issue the most critical issues were identified by residents of the community.
And number one issue was open space and natural areas, number two small town character. Number three quality of life high quality of life. Number four engaged community. I'm not sure what that means. Number five historical character of downtown number six commitment to environmental sustainability, I think that actually should have read climate change. We really need to find ways to get a greater spread of variety of folks in the town contributing to these policies, or at least doing a workshop where they're becoming aware where the officials have a policy discussion because policy discussion results in policies that matter.
It's really hard when you don't have policies in front of you to talk about it. You can't see what's missing, what maybe should be added but what's maybe there and should be taken out. And I think we really need to talk about policies that are going to protect the town, the small-town character and a lot of what's really precious to us. The city does have a public information officer so why not utilize her skills in outreach? What about a flyer to every single household in the town Anyway, what one more thing just one final thing. We've so we these important significant issues were raised at the very first visioning workshop and and from my point of view we've kind of jumped over a thorough discussion vetting, fleshing out of what the policies are that we want to create.
We could have issue statements that kind of categorize these important policies with an issue statement that flushes out what this really means and then your policies can derive from that. And I'm sorry, I forgot. I did have something else to say.
Thank you
Kathy, much appreciated. I had one more thing to say but can't remember so...
You can always write to us. Next we have Balance, I think he left. Carolyn Goldwasser and then Heidi Whitman and then Steve Colomay. Heidi? Heidi Whitman, then Steve Colomay and then Larry Steingold.
Good evening, my name is Heidi Whitman and I live in the city of Ojai. Tonight I heard a couple of guiding principles that don't really seem to me to be being considered in this whole planning effort. One is supporting an Ojai Valley economy that prioritizes overall human and ecological needs. Another one is aggressively addressing endemic environmental challenges such as climate change And the last one, which isn't one of those guiding principles but I do not see where we are trying to balance tourism with the quality of life for residents.
And so you can talk about how live work unit adds 0.25 traffic trips during the peak hour but that is sort of ridiculous when we have a million visitors a year. So I would really like to see this effort talk more about what policies are we going to have to balance tourism with the quality of life for the people that live here. So thanks.
Thank you, Heidi. Next, Steve Colame and then Larry Steingold.
3:21 – 3:306 turns
Well, first I want to thank the Council and the Planning Commission for truly a robust and good discussion here tonight. It's been pleasant to see a conversation like this. My view is that what you're doing now is probably the most important process in your terms. The general plan of the city of Ojai is supposed to give us a view for what Ojai will look like in 2045 or 2050. We've almost lost sight of that as we start to micro-view these four parcels now, What would be ideal is if we had a crystal ball and we could look at 2045 or 2050 and say, what do we expect Ojai to look like? What do we want it to be? What do we want to preserve? What do we want to protect? What do we want to enhance? And think of it in those very, very positive terms and make sure that those guide you as you get into the weeds in terms of the particular policies that you're looking at.
I also want to talk about representativeness. The first community visioning document that was from December 2020 there were about 300 residents. There were broad bold kinds of comments Then in April 2021, the visioning workshop had 60% of the residents were from Ojai. 40% were from outside of the city of Ojai looking at this group and this board most of them were seniors or elderly there were only 45 residents who were from Ojai So if we're looking at, I mean, I'm an old guy myself. So to be somewhat morbid about this in 2045 or 2050 a lot of us are not going to be here.
Where are those who are going to actually be here carrying forward in 2045-2050? And just as since I taught graduate statistics To be talking about 64% of residents or participants when that might really only represent 38 people, I think is incredibly misleading. What should be there are the actual numbers. There's a little book called How to Lie with Statistics by Huff, which I gave people my students to read in graduate statistics.
It would be really useful to see that because it's truly misinformation. Thank you.
Thank you Steve. Next we have Larry Steingle.
Thank you very much. Congratulations this is very nice. On the VMUs, I think you should do the VMU and all the connection properties that are adjacent to it. And also maybe do Fulton VMU and also consider Ojai Avenue as a VMU and tie it all together so we have one zone for the city and everything that's commercial along Ojai Avenue is all VMU because it'll make life easier.
And if those businesses or those properties have some pushback, they can finagle it just like they did for the VMU. They have buffers. They'll give somebody a free pass for the first sale and then it reverts. On the Bryant Street, 40 years of industrial real estate business. Leave it alone. It's industrial leave it that way you've already allowed retail in you started with the cannabis and it became medical and then it became retail and now it can be full blown retail because the camel's nose is under the tent and they're pushing all the rents. Because they want to have Long, they can pay more than Houston and they can pay more than everybody. Which knocks out all the typical service people and knocks out all this stuff you've got maybe 7 properties available in the whole city that are for sale and for rent.
You've got an 800 foot building for sale on Brian for 600000 dollars. This is nuts even if you had somebody come into town where you're going to put them? Okay, so all the economic developments are very nice but that's not going to help. Residential-wise I don't see where you're going to put them. Don't forget the people who live in the fancy houses and the expensive ones who want to live here and stay here and live in condos but there really is no place to put them. You've got Bryant for 50 units, you've got the one next to where Chaparral is, you've got the one on Gridley, you get some other stuff.
Where are you gonna go? Up? You can't do more Whispering Oaks, you can't do the one like they have on a corner of Montgomery and Grand. That's one floor I believe isn't it? Or two floors? Those are easy. Those are country apartments. They're very nice. So if that's going to be part of this but how many people do we want to live in Ojai in 2045? In 2035? You're talking three point unit 3.1 per bedroom per house 500. So you've got 5,000 bedrooms or houses here now 4,000 and change that's 15,000 people more or less if you do the math right something like that where are you going to put them?
You get half the people in town don't come into town anyway they only come in on weekends and you've got the million visitors now the tourists and then you get all the commuters So I mean, this is nuts and bolts stuff. This is paint the roads, do whatever you have to do. This is bricks and mortar. This is what the town's gonna look like in 2025 years. Thank you very much, and this is important.
Thanks Carolyn. Carolyn did you wanna speak? After Carolyn? Oh she's here. I thought she left.
Hi my name is Carolyn Goldwasser and I live in Ojai. I am interested in talking about safety, mainly. Safety from vehicles, safety from air quality from vehicles and safety in trying to cross streets or walk along streets or bicycle. I no longer bicycle but many people still do and I've noticed quite a lot of young people are bicycling on the sidewalks in the arcade Which makes it a little bit of an unsafe place for me to walk in the arcade with teenagers, you know, bicycling along on the sidewalks.
That's a matter of safety. They probably shouldn't be there I don't think but maybe they feel safer bicycling on the sidewalks than bicycling in the streets where there is a lot of traffic So that's one issue that I have. I don't have a car, I haven't had a car in many many years but I have bicycled and now I am a pedestrian and I ride the public transportation which in this city is excellent!
You have a trolley Seven in the morning till seven at night, seven days a week and the bus that goes down to the beach and the train, the Amtrak. Excellent! This is a place you can live without car if you are pretty good walker which I am. And which a lot of people could be. But it's, it's a one of the great benefits of Ojai is that you have a great transportation system already, which I think A climate issue, it helps you with climate in the future. The more people that use the public transportation, the less people drive cars.
It becomes better in my opinion for climate benefits And the less people that drive cars means some more people that are walking and getting more exercise and being stronger and healthier. Now, I personally don't believe that I'm going to be alive in 2045 although it's possible my mom lived to be 99 years old so it's possible but I do think that we should get children To give their opinion, teenagers were just reading poems at the library tonight where I was a little while ago.
And get more of those groups of people putting their input into what they see their life they want to be in 20 years when they are 25 or 30 years old. Thank you very much.
Thank you Carolyn next we have Brian Aikens.
3:30 – 3:3813 turns
Hello there, Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. That might give you an idea why I'm up here. I take it very personally to help preserve Ojai and the downtown historic district that we have been advocating working for basically goes from Blanche west side of museum to Fox down at Ojai Rose. And so if your Looking at building houses, I love this. It says encourage building design that transitions from commercial character of downtown that's called Mission Revival to the primarily residential character of the VMU. A lot of porches on the front but not sure they belong downtown so anyway that's my concern i want to get a would like to get Graphic that blows up to the plot plans. I think I know the plots on downtown Ojai better than anybody in Ojai after walking those and just to see what's planned for those areas again, you know protecting our downtown is a key to us it's kind of the heart of who we are and if we do things that disrupt that the beat slows thank you.
Thank you, Brian. Wes, any comments online?
Yes, Mayor. We have two raised hands. First we'll have Renee followed by Anita. Renee, you have the floor. Renee, are you there?
I see her.
Last chance and we'll move on. OK, moving on next, we'll have Anita Yes,
you can hear me. Okay good. Okay. Well thank you all for all your hard work and bringing this about first thing I would like to say is the Ventura affordable housing income Limit is too high. Ojai has at least historically, it's had a much lower average income than the county of Ventura. So I would like us to prioritize not affordable housing based on those statistics but very low affordable housing. Very low and low and extremely low because those are the ones that are falling through the cracks all the time even if so I won't say anything more about that second Would like to have a micro home, a trailer tiny home whatever you want to call it for homeless and for the very low extremely low people who are being overlooked and who are being displaced.
We'd like to have more community building in our town, so more support for the recreation department for that children who do not have access to the recreation services expand that and also have support for community building amongst ourselves. Unfortunately I don't want to be a doomsayer but there could be some very serious Um, future developments both climate wise and in terms of our economy. And we need to band together and develop community. We also need to diversify our economy we can't depend so much on tourist money to support our city. So we need to find a way to diversify our economy and put residents first business should be second I'm sorry to say some people won't like that but I believe residents should come first.
In terms of updating the general plan, it's not just to get diversity. It's to make... Just because for racials somebody mentioned that the purpose was diversity but it's also which had been stated earlier and what this included was to make the general plan with current concerns and interests. Let me see. Yeah, we have a million visitors. They are using our infrastructure. They're using our roads, our water, our sewage systems and we also have residents who use all of those things too so maybe we should have the tourism support more of those services and increase I know people won't like this as well but increase the taxes on the bed tax. Thank you very much and thank you for all your work.
Next we have Teal Rowe followed by Renee. Teal, you have the floor?
Thank you. Can you hear me?
Yes.
Thank you. I appreciate all of the hard work that tonight represents. I really appreciate that from everybody and I do realize that there have been envisioning workshops and such. I would like to add a comment tonight We're in envisioning from the, from the future on. To also look at the historical vision, because especially for Bryant Street and the industrial section which I believe is really, really important to a community for mental health and the ability to express and build and make noise without worrying about it.
And also historically seeing that on Pearl Street That used to be industry and now it's whatever it is. And lower Fulton used to be industry, and now it's whatever it is. So historically things are sort of going away and turning into housing. Also historically I remember when Bryant Street was being built I think it was a wall that needed to be built in order to block off the industry from the housing.
So, I think the separation from manufacturer and housing is really, really, really important. And I know we need places to live, I understand that. I also think that creative expression and in an environment to do so is very important. And then tonight also in these meetings I noticed that there sort of becomes an assumption That I'm hearing, yeah there's going to be 150 units and it's just assuming because it's needed and all of that. And it just sort of glides over some of the really deep, deep soul reasons that Ojai even exists. So thank you for listening to me tonight and thank you for all of your hard work. I do appreciate it and notice it. Thank you.
Thank
you
too.
Next we have Renee followed by Sue. Renee, you have the floor? Renee are you there?
3:38 – 3:439 turns
Hello, can you hear me? Yes. Okay. I appreciate listening to all the comments from all the people who've spoken up as well as the robust discussion. I actually agree with some of the people who have spoken up earlier about The need for a focus on how we can make Ojai more livable for Ojai residents and affordable for Ojai residents. One of the things I'm hoping to see, and I don't know what you call it, but is there any way to have a Infrastructure overlay bias toward bicycle paths and bicycle even easements on any new projects that are developed from here on out. It's been lacking, and it's been missing in our planning department for years and years and years we could be doing so much more.
In our community on for example the Becker project, the north side of that property along the fence with the neighboring condos should all have been a bike path. There should have been a bike path that connect the east side of the town over to the west side of the area without having to get on a main street There's this infrastructure overlay is the only thing I know how to call it, but I think I get really excited today. I was very excited because I was out for a walk and I saw young kids five and six year old kids with their parents and they're part of The Ojai Bicycle Club, and these long young very young kids were on bicycles with helmets and dirt bikes and they were trying to learn how to do jumps and do really fun things. They could barely even sit on the seat of their bicycle!
But it was so exciting to see that these kids were wanting to learn and parents were ready to teach them how to do it in a safe and responsible manner. The more we can start educating and promoting the use of infrastructure, and the development of safe ways to use it is something that I think we've been missing for years and years and years. So I'd like to see that be added to any project that comes forth and have the developers have to pay or have that be part of their process for getting approval, that they have to exhaust all of those infrastructure needs.
And that gives them credits for doing extra in that area. Thank you very much. Thank you, Renee.
Last raised hand we have is Sue. So you have the floor? Sue, are you there? Last call.
Hello?
We can hear you.
Oh, you can hear me now?
Yes.
Okay. Yeah, I want to thank you all. It's been really interesting to hear the discussion. I never got involved or heard about these visioning meetings. I think they were just maybe pre-pandemic and since then it seems to me things have drastically changed Because of the pandemic, so many people have learned that they can and have begun to work at home. And so this whole discussion about live-work and the Bryant Street area, well really all of Ojai what kind of zoning and overlays are there concerning whether it's live work residential or industrial or whatever?
It seems like that whole framework has changed because so many more people are working from their home. And so it seems like that may need some clarification or redefinition about what is live work. So I'm conflicted about the Bryant Street area because I'm wondering if in terms of the possibility of having truly low income housing, are there any other areas that have land that is cheap enough or doable for a low-income housing?
So I think these are considerations that should be thought about when you're Deciding how to, you know, decide what goes where and what kind of zoning and regulations and things are for the city. So I just wanted to make that point. And again, thank you very much. I really hope to be more involved in here about the next community opportunity for the community to have input Because I would love to do that. Thank you.
Thank you, Sue.
That's all man.
Roll-call vote 1–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
3:43 – 3:5921 turns
So I have a couple of things to say one is that the speaker who suggested well first of all i've changed my mind about the workshops and um will not change my mind but solidified the idea that I think we do need to do more outreach to the community and diversity and I have some ideas I've done focus groups with kids and young adults so I can talk to Chiara and see if we can figure out a way to actually do that So I have come to hear the community say that there is a need for that. And I think to the mayor's point or somebody's point, we're post covid and we need to rethink what's going on.
And then I wanted to I had this idea. I still don't know about Bryant Street. So and we can talk about Ojai, but I had this idea about the climate. Perhaps as a compromise, we could have a statement around what our beliefs are and then interweave in all of the elements because I think it's really important that there be a direct link rather than something that separated out because it is intertwined and should be intertwined in anything that we do so potentially we could do like an executive summary and then interweave it I'd like to hear from the other council members as to the Ojai Corridor, knowing that we do have the two overlays with the school property and Becker owns the second one. We have the American Legion that is thinking about and planning for affordable housing for veterans.
So, so the it is going to become a housing corridor. In one way or another and zoning is taken out of our hands once you start doing affordable housing. And, you know, you have nonprofit developers coming in and doing that. And then the other question is we have just approved the ATP. Yeah, do we do that was gonna be like I'm crazy. Okay, so I'm like yeah i think we did.
So that is a stretch of bicycling, that is going to go from one end of town to the other. It will be accessible and with alternative transportation for just anyone who lives on that corridor, there now will be as well we hope a safe biking area. I think that's something to throw into the mix as well. Like I said, I look forward to hearing about what other people and other council members and our friends from the Planning Commission have to say about the Ojai Ave Corridor.
Mayor Pro Tem Francine and then Commissioner Starkweather.
Okay, so I'm going to talk about a little bit about the housing overlay, and then the vision for 2045. And I really want to express my appreciation for the comments from the public, especially Dr Steve Columet loved what you said, thank Um, as far as the housing overlay goes I would be in favor of option three because we already have house whispering oaks on Ojai Avenue. Then all the way to the border where the fire stick pottery is there's housing.
Isolated, but it's there fire state pottery. She she lives there so it's already there and I'm in favor of extending extending it to the border looking at that. I don't have any details, but just want to point out that it's already there and places where we can have housing overlay like at the American Legion across from the smaller Westridge. When I think of a vision for 2045, then it makes me like fearless to put out ideas that the town may not be ready for now. But ideas I presented in 1994 are now mainstream. So I think we could get ideas into the general plan that will evolve over time and become accepted by society.
And so I want to point out that the, the greatest negative impact on our small town character is the vehicle traffic you know we have level D on Ojai Avenue. Every side street Grand Avenue. All of this traffic. Is there is the direct result of past policies that prior to prioritize the convenience of cars, we have to remember that it's not an accident traffic is not like the rain. It is completely under our control if we have a vision. Okay, so our vision.
Could be could include. I mean, there are things that we've talked about that I believe are acceptable and then there are things that might still be considered radical but for example i think everyone agrees that every child should be able to ride their bike safely to school, so that would be the safe routes to school. We could have car-free affordable housing other communities have done it so that instead of taking up parking you know the space more asphalt and all that you could have car sharing there can be programs if the affordable housing is you know 10 50 minute walking distance to town Tourists can park on the outskirts of town, that's completely doable. You can do a citywide 20 is plenty or 25 save lives so that nobody's confused about the speed you could also do the ATP is You know, right now we're planning for sharrows on Ojai Avenue.
But we are never ever going to keep people from riding on sidewalks until we remove the parking and we have bike lanes real bike lanes up and down Ojai Avenue. And that can all it's all doable if we have the vision and the willpower to do it. I think that's just about the gist of it. Nothing I'm saying here hasn't been done in other cities, where the city has policies and that's right in line with climate, where we do not continue to make Thank you very much.
We had a 1998, we adopted Ojai's first bicycle pedestrian master plan. I believe that we're ready for that because if we're serious about maintaining our small town character, we have to get serious about managing the traffic and put forth these ideas at the chamber. I think Jamie is already on board actually and he and Rachel thank you. You've been watching all the people with one Usually one person per car, you see it everywhere. All of that we can change and it can even be a unit in the... Climate should be a unit in the schools and the kids should get PE credit for riding their bikes. All of that is doable and in line if we want to make climate a priority traffic is like the biggest impact. That's where the oil and the gas and then of course it's all connected to housing commuting and all of that.
But the tourists, the millions of tourists are not the problem it's the millions of cars. That's it. I'm done. Commissioner
Starkweather
Thank you. Uh, looking at these options 3 seems to be the best but it's hard to tell because I can't actually see the lots.
I can see it. I know that area
well, I sort of know it, but you know, but my biggest concern is the single family units and. It seems like we have plenty of single family units in this town, 80% of our home or single family. So if we're looking at those I would like to know what kind of lot size we're talking about. How many units per acre? How many square, we shouldn't be building anything that's over 1200 square feet. Because people don't want, because people always say if you build new single family houses it's going to raise the price of housing and people are gonna come in with money and wanna buy these houses. Well if you make them small you're not gonna get that type of person so and also the more The more concentrated, the more attached, the more multifamily. The less water we're going to use, the more sustainable it's gonna be.
It's gonna be better for the climate. And it's gonna be less traffic, because all the vehicle miles traveled statistics show that the more single family, the larger the size of the house, the more traffic per household. And multifamily and particularly affordable housing has the least amount of traffic. So I don't know that we're even looking at those kinds of details.
I agree with almost everybody that talked about we need more diversity of input And I liked the fact that Leslie picked up on my idea of focus groups, because that's really the way you can actually get people to have discussions and get details and break them down into different demographic groups. And the other thing that I think it's hard for most people to just look at a map and envision what it's going to look like So sometimes having some renderings of what we're talking about would give people a better idea of what the alternatives are. And I've seen that done before.
And the final thing is on the climate, I'm totally in support of having a climate element. I have fought at the county level to get one and we didn't quite get it but we at least got a Climate Action Plan and they integrated it But it seems like that is a, um. Something that the city council would have to make a decision because you need a greenhouse gas inventory 1st and then it's, it's a very technical thing developing a climate action plan. And we need a consultants that are experts on that.
I don't think just we can just decide what our. Plans are going to be for climate action without doing that type of analysis. So you're targeting what are your larger, uh, sources of greenhouse gas? Yeah.
Any other comments from commissioner Andy?
Yeah. Um, so I'm wondering if tourism is an appropriate topic for the general plan and addressing tourism cohabitating with a million tourists a year
I think it wasn't part of the focus of tonight's meeting. So, I guess it's something that we can talk about as part of the general plan update. I think maybe the question is how far do we want to get into this tonight at this point? No,
I don't want to open up a discussion on that tonight. I just want to find out that if I made a motion to append to what we're already voting on Adding a section on addressing tourism based upon the input that we get on planning that we can do to make, achieve some form of harmony between our new tourism life. I mean, I think somebody tonight said that people only go downtown on weekends and everybody I know We will not go downtown on weekends for any circumstances so we may have people.
Never going downtown.
Can I just? Yeah, I live downtown and people actually walk you know they walk they walk the streets they go downtown their friends come families go it may not come from that from far away but there's a lot of activity in the downtown in my neighborhood of people heading downtown to go. And also
you can park lots of places a couple blocks away because I go downtown all the time. I'm just saying what people tell me
Yeah, no I know. Do not go down
there.
I think it
depends where you live. Do you want to add?
Yeah, I'd like to add to Rachel's motion that we address tourism and adapting to tourism harmonizing with the residents as part of the general plan. Okay, so
I do that. Yeah. That will make sense and you might as
well. Could I ask Councilmember all of us know crosstalk let's allow council member Whitman to finish.
Okay, so what I've heard is that we had something like 300 people show up for a visioning session in 2020. who then put small town character as their top priority. And then I attended this workshop that included the housing overlay topic we're talking about right now for the downtown corridor, and I don't know that there were as many people as there are here tonight for that workshop I don't think there were.
And so, I think that those people who put small town character is their highest priority are gonna be very upset if we are not allowing them to come back and speak to us again or rally their friends if they hear that part of what we're considering Two story residential construction along the corridor. So I don't, I think we need to have community feedback on that issue and those are my comments at this
3:59 – 4:059 turns
point. Commissioner Trent.
Yeah, I just had a couple points as we talk about visioning and where we want to go in 2045. I think we need to kind of take a step back and look at the broader picture as well. I mean, we live in the state of California so it's very popular state. Just to throw out some numbers, in 1980 we had 24 million people that lived in California. 2020 we have 39 million people live in California So in that time span we had, in 1980 we had 9 million homes. 2020 we had 14 million homes so we didn't keep up with the pace of building homes to handle the population growth that California had. Now the Department of Finance in California says that in 2050 we should have about 50 million people living in California. So that demand is always gonna be on Ojai.
We're always gonna have people that wanna live next to the coast Next to the ocean, so mountains were only 15 minutes away from the beach. You're always going to have people that want to live here. So we have to figure out okay well how much housing are we comfortable with? When do we come to a point where we look at our valley and we say maybe we can't handle that much. Maybe we're at capacity according to Ventura County, we're at capacity. Our resources are tapped So we have to kind of consider that too, we got a look at the Ventura County picture. We're a microcosm were four square miles within this bigger valley, a valley that's like 20,000 people you know we're like 7000 so we're small, we got a big, bigger Valley and inside that we got County, which is about a million people.
We've got a big county and Ohio's a desirable place to live so we gotta understand the demand is always going to be there and there's a good um I don't know if you guys heard Shane Phillips the UCLA guy talk
yeah
well he made it he made a good point he said you can't have an appealing unchanging and affordable town. You can have two but you can have three We've chosen in Ojai since 1980 or prior to that we wanted to have appealing and we wanted to have unchanging. So that leaves affordability out of the question. Anyway, just
one. Just to pick up on your point Commissioner Trent and unchanging keep it's really important for all of us to keep in mind that we live in the fastest heating county in the continental US we've gone up 4.7 degrees Fahrenheit were experiencing climate driven a ratification which is permanent change in our climate. So that's really got to be taken into consideration. The other thing to pick up on your point is we live in a floodplain and a high fire zone with two exits, and on a Saturday evening when there are 2,500 tourists in town, you know, we've gotta be able to get everybody out quickly.
Yeah, in 2017 when we had our Thomas Fire, there was a period where all the roads were closed
Right. And just, I'll get to you in just a second comes number will but I think it's important it's 10 o'clock, we should start wrapping it up. And I just want to express gratitude to all the speakers who came online and here, we really appreciate your input and thank you to all the commissioners council members. It's just super important to hear. Yeah, I'm not sure if I mentioned it but i think that the woman who spoke about having a skeleton sort of envisioning
Something to work from, in other words. So not just open it up but maybe start with what we have and have people modify that and either toss it out or make it better or something like that so we're not starting from ground zero again. I mean, we've done some of the work, so it might be good to try to leverage some of the work that we've done and have a starting point. And the other thing is to Commissioner Trent's point We also have to know, look at reality. The state of California I think in 2023 has close to 300 housing bills coming out and if we believe And it's possible that we're not going to be privy to those regulations. We're not looking at reality, and I think it's not going to serve us well because we have not built and Ojai is almost writ large of what the state of California thinks about housing, and they're making huge changes.
And I would hope that we will at least consider that. I have 200 laws coming out in 2020. Well, I don't know if they're going to get passed, but you know, they're up there. It's reality. We cannot shut the gates. It just it's not possible. So just going to keep that in mind. They want the state of California once us to build affordable housing. And if we don't do it, they will make sure that we do it.
I have no doubt about that. So you know there you go. I just have to say that because I think it's the reality of it
all. Council Member Lange
4:05 – 4:1662 turns
Thank you, um, to that point. So I totally, I mean, I agree with you we're seeing the evidence that the state is trying to have more control over the cities and so for that reason, I think wherever we can Maintain our control, knowing that this is a trend, knowing that this is something that is going to happen. I think we need to be really mindful when making land use decisions.
The other thing too I want to speak to Commissioner Trent's point is that there's new information coming out about population And there was a study that was recently done about the California exodus during COVID, that the population declined by more than 500,000 individuals. And arguably it's because of the cost of living because people can live they don't have to you know they can work virtually they don'y have to live in high highly concentrated areas like Silicon Valley but that's part of a bigger trend and And the Pew Research Center came out with a study that by 2100, that population have across the world but especially in Europe and in America. The population's been steadily climbing but for the first time since 1950 populations are expected to decline And plateau and continue to decline by 2100.
So I think that, yes there's a need for housing but I think-
That world population
you're talking about? No because they're growing in India and in parts of Africa and in China.
Decreasing.
Yes but they're decreasing in Europe and Latin America and America and the US
But we're, we're one of the few that aren't actually decreasing. We've got a millennial generation and also Gen Z that's pretty large.
This is this is this is including that I'd like to see
that one.
Yeah it's the Pew Research Center you can look it up. This was a study that they did.
I'm going to suggest we wrap it up with Commissioner Stark weather and then go to the vote.
But just take me a second, actually, the, the number of people that are living single households is increasing And the fact that you have less kids per household doesn't mean you have less households. So actually, because more and more people are living by themselves, you either need more multifamily or apartments so that there's more places for those people to live. They don't need 2,000 square foot houses.
I wanna go back to a bugaboo which is we're debating in a sense our opportunities and our threats. We seem to have disagreement about that And that's what bothers me about we never got the actual SWOT analysis with a list of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats from the professional consultants. So we could decide whether we agree with those and we all could be going forward together with an agreement as to where you know, where we are and where we need to go because we don't have that.
So anyway, that's the point I'd like to make.
And, of course we can have that in the workshop. So we can I'm
just
asking the
consultants
are doing it because
that's what they were asked to do.
Okay. Councilmember Whitman.
Yeah so somebody listed earlier the, the priorities from the 2020 visioning workshop, and I would like to see how those How those priorities are going to be worked into the general plan. And that was part of my asking the question earlier, whether the current general plan which actually has a lot of those concepts in it is going to be repeated and perpetuated or are we starting from scratch? And if we are then I would like to see us focus more on those things that Residents have talked about their, you know general concepts for guiding principles for our community.
You're talking about open space small time character historical character environmental sustainability,
those small town character. Yes. Okay, sustainability.
Well let's, let's go back to the motion. Let me say, um, would you like to repeat that please Mr city attorney.
Happy to Madam Mayor. The motion on the table is to take no further action tonight on the land use policy questions on the table, to direct staff to come back with another public workshop to be held on a Saturday. The goal of increasing the diversity of participants and then to return with options and prices for a climate action plan or climate action element.
And I heard a fourth component that I would ask which was from Councilwoman Whitman to confirm, Councilwoman Lange would add, which is to add a section I'm not sure about the details addressing tourism to better achieve harmony between residents and tourists. And the question would be, does Councilman Lange accept that as an amendment? And if so, Councilwoman Woodman is a seconder. So that would then get baked into motion.
Okay, all right. Could we get the roll call please Weston? Yes ma'am questions.
We were going to break up the or we were going to vote on breaking out issues also I wanted to find out if Councilmember Lange would accept. I really think it's important to have the climate component interwoven into all of the elements so that you see the context in which we're talking about it I don't care about whether or not it sits as its own entity as well, but I really would like to see it in context of the other elements. So if in some way we could with friendship amend your motion, I think it's important.
Yeah, so I really want it as its own standalone because we can include so many. Because I think it's important for us to have a comprehensive climate action plan or a climate plan is a part of this. I agree with you that climate needs to be a part of everything in the general plan but I don't see that replacing The need for something that is standalone.
Yeah, and I'm perfectly fine with it not being an either or but that we have the climate plan stand alone but also ask if staff can put it in context and try to weave it into the other elements. If it's possible to do I just you know I would like that as well. Standalone is absolutely fine with me.
Okay, and councilmember line you're okay with voting on each one separately. Correct. For your motion. Yes. Okay, I can we have the first item, Matt.
First item would be to take no further action tonight on the policy questions on the table.
Okay.
What does that mean that everything we did. What did we do tonight that would work. How does that motion impact what we have accomplished tonight.
So the. Previous decisions already made would stand, so direction to staff to return with the necessary documents to shift Montgomery north of Aliso to VMU would stand. That was done and direction to staff to return with the documents to shift the residences on the east side of Fulton from CM to manufacturing to VMU would stand. The other questions posed by the consultants about the OI Avenue overlay zone and housing, and about the rest of Bryant with no direction given deferred to the future. That's this part of the motion.
So we didn't provide any direction?
Correct
And we will
that would be the motion if you want to provide direction. Absolutely, that's a policy choice vote no on the motion and make it different motion
I just want to make sure you know it's been a long night, so to make sure that everything we grappled with discuss that that motion doesn't mean staff ignores it or anything like that.
I
don't know. No,
I would understand everything is on the table but to be very clear we will not do anything to move those things forward if that motion passes unless and until the council provides that direction at a future workshop or a future meeting
and of course
that
doesn't mean that the staff so the staff is actually has heard our consultants have actually heard what we've discussed in terms of our You know, thoughts and visions and what we want guidance on. And that'll be incorporated into it. We come back with correct?
Yeah, it will be incorporated
into the workshop discussions for sure.
So why do we need that motion?
Maybe let me phrase another way 2 states of the world. Choice number one, the motion as it stands is that we come back. There's no direction to staff to write up any of the changes to OI Avenue nor to the rest of Bryant. And it would come back at the next assuming the workshop motion passes, which I think it will. It'll come back into a workshop to get more public input and then return to council to future date when it comes back to counsel. It'll be the options that questions the points that are raised tonight will be further analyzed by staff but there will be no draft documents.
Option two, other state of the world vote down that motion and instead secure approval from the majority for a motion to direct staff to draft documents to shift OI Avenue to allow housing under one of the other options and or to shift Bryan Street to allow changes. So two states of the world.
Yeah so it's like a pause?
It's a deferral to the next workshop if the workshop motion also passes
Okay,
okay.
Roll call please Weston
roll call, Mayor Pro Tem Francine
I have a quick question. Are we also doing an envisioning workshop? How many workshops are we doing? Okay, and then we're going to cover everything in that workshop.
That is the motion.
Okay, okay,
real cool don't cover it and then we have to come back for a second
session. I'm thinking, okay.
All
right,
roll call please listen.
Okay, yes.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion. Okay, okay, real cool don't cover it and then we have to come back for a second session. I'm thinking, okay. All right, roll call
Show transcript
4:16 – 4:2254 turns
okay all right the second item Matt please.
Second motion is to have another public workshop on all of the above which would be on a Saturday with the direction to focus on diversity in participants.
Okay roll call please Weston.
Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 motion is to have another public workshop on all of the above which would be on a Saturday with the direction to focus on diversity in parti · 1 under review
Show transcript
Next item,
Matt. I'll ask at the end. I'll ask a question about the Saturday. Yeah. Go ahead, Matt.
Third motion is for staff to return with options and prices for a climate change resiliency element and or a climate action plan.
Okay thank you roll call please Wesley. Wait why and or? Why not both?
And or would cover both and or is a climate action plan, a climate change resilience element or both
to give us options. Is that correct
options and prices.
Okay, options and prices, but we also
agreed that we would work to interweave the Climate Action Plan thingy into the other elements so that it would have context is that part of this motion or is that just
what I think Councilmember Lang did you want
Yeah, so Council Member Berul. One thing I'm wondering is if that would be redundant if we have a separate standalone piece? If that would suffice just having one climate action plan?
You feel like it would be properly put in context and it wouldn't need to find its form in the individual session sections.
Yes, and an example I'm
pieces
of an example of that that I'm that we're that was that is tonight's an example of that because as we've been talking about each one of these pieces of the land use We've mentioned things like environmental justice or like we've tied in a lot of, I mean, I think we're all have a like mind in this one area. Like this is something we can agree on and so my sense is that if we haven't climate action plan, then we could refer back to it when making any decisions and say does this match with that?
Okay, so as we agreed to climate plan content. We can instruct our consultants that I want you to weave that into this aspect of the
plan. Okay just want to make sure that and we approved a Climate Action Plan like three sessions ago didn't we?
We approved to put it on the agenda, but we as
a
goal.
Yes, we never so this would actually be taking over to
do is to
okay so just said this would be, this would actually ties that and and we'd go ahead and pass it.
Yeah, exactly. All
right
now
Weston
roll call please.
Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 · 2 under review
Show transcript
Okay and
the
final final motion would be to direct staff in the consultants to prepare an element or sections addressing the policy of achieving a better harmony between residents and tourists.
Thank you roll call please Weston. Wait a minute. That's kind of vague.
What say what there are many among residents and tourists.
Right, it'd be as I understand the motion. It's to direct staff to come up with or bring back policies that could be adopted to accomplish those goals all in one place rather than spread throughout the general plan as they are now fulfilling the initial vision statement regarding creating maintaining the city small town character
but
tourism element Sort of a
management element, it's a council member Whitman's motion. So do you want to say anything or no? No.
OK,
let's just vote.
Well, I had we didn't really talk about that, did we? I mean, I'm thinking that that's something that's I mean, I agree. We can
bring it back to the next.
I agree that we need it, but I don't know that it's part of this particular
Well, that's
why I
asked.
Yeah. And
I was invited to vote on it could be an appropriate part of the.
Well, you know what?
And we're not always. Anything can be anything. Okay. So we're not adopting a my motion is not that we're adopting a tourism element, but that they bring us what would be in, you know, being that in terms of a plan to Allow our residents to get some relief from the tourism. That's
really,
well you can see it, you can vote. All right, whatever we want. Go
Roll-call vote 2–1 · 1 under review
Show transcript
4:22 – 4:223 turns
Council member will
know. Okay, all right thank you that's it traffic. All right. Any final comments before we adjourn tonight I just want to thank everyone for being attentive and productive and civil and thank you for all your great ideas we are adjourned
transportation and see everyone Thank you.