UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:0717 turns
Call to order
we have a quorum may we have the roll call please Weston.
Roll call, called by Weston Montgomery · 1 under review
Show transcript
Thank You Weston and welcome everyone to the May 9th 2023 meeting of the Ojai City Council James Will you say the pledge for us, please?
Yes thank you Mayor. Please join me in standing right hand over your heart ready begin.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
And before the approval of the agenda just a couple shifts we've had this evening because we've had some questions. I did pull the rent disclosure ordinance from this agenda to make room for item six council member rules request about indemnification To make sure that there was space and time, but we've had a change. Item number six per council member's rules request has been pulled. So do you wanna... There have been questions about that council member rule? Do you want to explain why it was on the agenda and why it was taken off today?
Yeah, I just have a lot more research to do on that issue and you know people take a while to get back to you so I felt that it would be better to have a complete picture rather than have a You know, I'm waiting for this. I'm waiting for that kind of approach to it seemed like it would be a waste of everyone's Very precious time. So that's why thank you
Okay, thank you and I do have a question because this came up in a couple of people asked In order to authorize indemnification It has to be on the agenda. It has to be haven't council majority to vote that
so there is not on tonight's agenda But of course having been pulled but yes any expenditure of funds in an unlimited fashion by the council requires Council majority approval
Okay, all right. Thank you. All right we have no presentations and We have one
commission report from Brian Aikens Chair of the HPC historic preservation
That's us Commission. Thank you mayor. Thank you all I just wanted my report is that tonight? I think it's item number I in the consent calendar councilmember Whitman has recommended Craig Walker to Become our fifth member to the Historic Preservation Commission. I have my wholehearted endorsement with Craig, I've been around long enough that I was on the commission with him when he was on it prior and then he had to drop off for Certain certain reasons and I think I have offered called him every time there was a vacancy that happened since then And so I'm happy happy that he's being recommended tonight. And again, I give him my full endorsement Would be happy to work with them again. Thank you very much
Thank You Brian
** I don't think we
voted to approve the agenda.
** Oops, sorry. Okay good. And a second? **
I'll second the motion. ** All in favor? **
Aye. ** Thank you James. We will move on to public communication and just a reminder these are items not on the agenda and because they're not on the agenda we cannot discuss them. We appreciate your viewpoint and we can agendize them for the future. Just a reminder that public comments are three minutes You'll hear a chime and in the spirit of equity, please stop talking when the chime ends There's no giving away time to another speaker. And if you're an agreement with the previous speaker just please say ditto So we will begin with Ron from the live with our library report then we have Bill Miley and then Chris I think it says Chris Ines
All right Thank you members of council. My name is Ron Solorzano, I am the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley and I just wanted to come here tonight to give you a general update on our programming over at the Ojai Library. And I want to start by saying that this year's summer reading program is going to begin on Monday May 15th. The year's theme is Find Your Voice And this is a time when readers of all ages are going to be able to participate in this program by logging their reading time online. You can get started on our website and there's some links that will be active as of May 15th for that.
We're gonna have some programs throughout the summer, a kickoff event, a closing event and then in addition For those who enter the time they're reading, they'll be entered to win some prizes, fun prizes throughout. Children and minors are going to be logging the number of minutes they read whereas adults are gonna re-log the number of books that they read and yeah go to our website for more info on that and the program runs through August 4th is when it concludes I also want to mention a special event coming up at the library this weekend. At 2 p.m. on Saturday, May 13th local author Leslie Rinchen Wongmo is going to visit the Ojai Library to talk about her new book which is titled Threads of Awakening an American Woman's Journey into Tibet's Sacred Textile Art.
For 500 years Tibetans have created stitched fabric artwork of sacred images And Leslie will share her experience with this ancient needlework tradition and the Buddhist values embodied in it. She is a textile artist, a teacher and an author whose artwork has been exhibited internationally. Also at the following week, 2 p.m., on Friday, May 19th, staff from the Alzheimer's Association will visit the Ojai Library to deliver a presentation titled Healthy Living for Your Brain and Body.
So you can come to the library to hear about research in the areas of diet and nutrition, exercise, cognitive activity, and social engagement, and to learn about some hands-on tools to help you incorporate these recommendations into a plan for healthy living. All of these events are happening in addition to our usual offerings which include story times, ukulele jam sessions, fiber art classes, our after school homework center, book discussion groups and more. You can visit our website again www.vencolibrary.org for more information on everything we have going on and that's all I have for now thank you so much.
Thank you Ron.
Ron are you aware that our mayor is going to read to the kids tomorrow?
Yeah, tomorrow. Gosh that'll be 1030 at the Ojai Library and yeah special guest. We're excited to have you. Thank you.
Next we have Bill Miley then Chris Inas and then Ruth Miller.
0:07 – 0:128 turns
Good evening. The theme is a quick look at our homeless problem, the countywide program which is called Continuum of Care System. A rental assistant program is the principal element of helping folks who fit into the continuum of care program who are likely to be unhoused or unhoused and homeless. Through the Continuum of Care program, folks in the Illini Valley can get some help depending on funding.
Rental assistance is a formal term in the state placed within the continuum of care system and coordinated by the County of Ventura and other counties in California. Many know it involves assisting individuals, households and families with limited and vanishing incomes to stay in their homes or residences as long as possible through the Rental Assistance Program. A caseworker establishes by working with a vulnerable individual household or family the risk of losing their residence.
The person must be able to participate willingly and cooperatively otherwise the caseworker can't do that Once the housing habitat is lost, folks become very vulnerable to unmanaged forces which can damage and bring increasingly dis-health to those involved. Such folks then become much more difficult to find and establish a working contact with them. Intervention to help get rehoused now involves much more focused work.
Short-term funding to prevent shelter loss can be prevented if caught before the housing is lost. In the 50s, 60s and 70s one income wage earner could generate enough income to provide a house and support for a family with children. We did that. Not now. Once the residence is lost, the situation becomes chronic especially with limited or no rental vacancies.
In summary our family shelter program in the winter certainly helps. The main organization trying to help with a homeless unhoused who are about to lose their homes is the Help of Ojai on a very small budget. Currently they have $10,000 in a grant from the Ojai Women's Fund. The need is great. The budget is very small. More funding is crucial.
Thank you Bill. Next we have Chris Ines then Ruth Miller and then Carolyn Goldwasser.
Good evening, council members of the community. My name is Chris and this is my friend Daniel. He's autistic and he's written a speech for you
Hi, my name is Daniel. I live on 510 Drown Avenue. I do not like when people speed on my street. They speed all the time and we need speed bumps on my street so people can slow down. We cannot base out of Back out. Out of our driveway because of speed or someone almost hit us and he will help me put speed bumps on my street so I can play safely on my street, thank you. Anything else?
2 minutes. No
Thank you, Daniel. Thank you Chris
Mayor I could probably just know related to that item so we did install the Humps that we were Testing it's the first time we've done something like that. We're testing them out on drown I'm thinking what one thing we can do coming up We can do sort of a report back after a few months and see how they're working and see Sort of what the thoughts are for next steps
If I could comment on that too and Daniel, I would just invite you to right north of Grand. Is he out there? Is he right there? Okay great Just north just north of grand We have a test test speed humps And and so I invite you to see what those let feel like and see what those look like and we are doing a study and I met with the group the slowdown drown group and Last Saturday, and they're noticing a positive difference even though they agree with you that it could be better. So cool
Thank you Thanks Next we have Ruth Miller then Carolyn Goldwasser and then David Wyand
0:12 – 0:177 turns
Hi, thank you for letting me be here tonight. My name is Ruth Miller I'm a part of a team of Ojai Valley residents with the purpose of improving the lives of the Ojai homeless and ultimately through collaboration and cooperation efforts create a year-round homeless shelter We see a need for truly low-cost housing, income based rentals and a year round supportive transitional shelter which could be a central point in providing services to the homeless in Ojai.
According to Jane Walters, Executive Director of Help with Ojai, Ojai's largest homeless population is working mothers with their children living in cars and couch surfing. Ojai is also seeing more elderly displaced because of raising rents, most of whom are living in cars. Most of the homeless in the Ojai Valley became homeless while living in the Ojai Valley.
These are our neighbors and I printed out some Posts from the Ojai Housing Facebook. Good morning, this is not an easy post to write but I am in immediate need. I've been living in the Ojai Valley for eight years in the same apartment for seven years. I've never been late on my rant. I have raving reviews from my landlord. I urgently need a place to call home.
Still looking for a place to stay, anything. Can also do some remodeling et cetera if needed. Semi-retired contractor. Hello Ojai we just got our 60 day notice from our landlords who have decided to sell my husband and I will need a new place to call home by June 1st or sooner. We currently pay twenty two hundred a month which is about as high as we can go Still looking for a two bedroom house for rent. Been looking for awhile now, for myself my husband and our four year old son we have two small dogs. We've been at the same place in downtown Ojai for eight years. The landlord raised the rent and we can't really afford it anymore.
I unexpectedly need to leave my apartment by the end of this month. My landlord needs a space for family. I'm in my late 30s, I have two senior dogs that are well behaved and housebroken. They sleep most of the time. I have now joined the many residents of Ojai that are being displaced. My landlords are turning my home into two rental properties, open to any rentals in the valley. I have a 30-pound Queensland healer that goes to work with me.
We think that Ojai needs to be, excuse me. We think there needs to be a coordinated partnership between the city county help of Ojai, the Ojai Valley's family shelter service organizations and churches. Our team is energized willing to do whatever is needed we just want you to know we're here and we're looking forward to working with you.
Thank
You Ruth. One more came out Sunday I have lived in Ojai for most of my life and am homeless for the first time ever. I need to find a room for rent please in Jesus almighty name Amen. She went to Nordoff High School and she's 64 years old.
Thank you,
Ruth. I think it would be good to mention that we're meeting next week with Kay Wilson Bolton who's president of Spirit of Santa Paula. She's agreed to meet with a core group of Ojai homeless advocates to give us a better understanding of the opportunities and obstacles in working toward a year-round homeless shelter I just want to express my great gratitude for Ruth. She's been, I think working on this for about three weeks now full time. I had to find...I can't do it. I've got too many things on my plate but she you know it's always risky teaming up with someone because you never know if they're going to drop the ball and you've wasted all these hours on the phone But Ruth, God bless you. You're not dropping the ball. You're going full speed ahead and I'm very grateful.
Thank
you a lot of help. And I appreciate all the people who are here and some of you guys in the community in general. It's been really, really gratifying. Thank you. Thank you
much. Appreciate it. Thank you, Ruth. Next we have Carolyn Goldwasser then David Wyand and then Carl Hindman.
0:17 – 0:255 turns
Hello, thank you. My name is Carole Engel Blosser and I live in Ojai and I am here to speak mainly regarding the homeless housing issue And I'm glad to be part of that team with Ruth and Susa and help of Ojai and Whole person care in Ventura and many other My specific focus on what I want to say is that many of the people that I have personally talked to who are homeless or nearly homeless, like some of the things that Ruth just read from Facebook, Thank you very much.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. without getting tickets for doing that. That's great, a good step for many people but for some people especially maybe elderly women who've just been in the hospital or something like that may not be the best choice. The ability for people in Ventura like case managers from Whole Person Care to connect with a homeless person that kind of wanders around and stays in the library half the day, and maybe sits at the park for part of the day. It's hard for them to connect with someone for an appointment even though they say I'm going to be here next Tuesday at 1030 The previous Wednesday or whatever, the person may not remember. They may not get there. They don't have a phone or whatever. So it's a difficult job that these people have who are trying very hard to help homeless people and quite successfully in many cases but the cost of having someone in and out of hospitals of course is borne mainly by Medical insurance is of one sort or another, probably Medicare, Medi-Cal, whatever.
It's not borne by the city but it is where people end up if they are in too bad a shape from sleeping on the ground or being cold or being wet or being hungry or whatever. And I would suggest that maybe having a small boarding house or two in town might be helpful, especially for some widows with small pensions who would like to continue to live here. Who can't? Who are some of them on the list that she read and maybe some other kind of concern for people who may need some kind of supportive care. Some people don't need supportive care, they just need a place to live.
So thank you very much and I appreciate being able to be here.
Thank you Carolyn. Next we have David Wyand and then Carl Hindman and then Leah Hindman.
Good evening everybody. I'm here to speak on the homeless issue as well. Last time that I spoke, I spoke about the gazebo being you know people in the gazebo and it being too close to the playground Since we have got the people moved out with the help of the sheriffs. The last survivor there was a 70 year old woman, she's deaf, she's in a wheelchair. Ruth very generous person got her a tent that she could stay in and we helped remove all of her stuff.
I'm looking forward to being a part of anything. Yeah, I'll do any research that you want me to do on helping the homeless. A tiny home village, I've been researching prices on tough sheds and different pallet homes and stuff like that. And I'm just wanting to help the homeless. So I was homeless at one point I've recovered from, I'm recovering from alcoholism and drug addiction. And I'm glad to say that last Wednesday during the planning commission, I had a chance to walk out and talk to one of the homeless gentlemen out here that was in real bad shape.
And I saw him on Friday and he said because of the talk that I had with him He contacted his family and he went to treatment Monday for three months, nine months, something like that. I'm just here to say that I'm here to help in any way.
Thank you. Thank You David Next we have Carl Hindman then Leah Hindman and then Jeffrey Starkweather
Wow, that was good. I was going to talk a little bit about that but I'm going to follow up on two weeks ago and I'm going to focus on shoplifting and the demise of the retail in this state and the erosion of the rule of law I used to live in San Francisco. So I see what's going on up there and I noticed last night or two nights ago former councilwoman Angela Alioto said that it's unlivable and I My concern is that it will spread and we have a great great city here, but it's inevitable It's happening Shoplifting is happening in Oxnard and they're starting to lock up the drug stores.
So I think we probably should be looking into some plans of how we're going to deal with this. Since I was here two weeks ago, we had noticed that Nordstrom, two Nordstrom stores are closing in San Francisco and one Nordstrom Rack. So this means in the last couple of months there were 17 closures in and around Union Square. The stated reasons for closures are Operating losses, shrinkage through theft and they cannot guarantee the security of their employees and patrons.
These are some of the companies Office Depot, Disney, Marshalls, H&M, Crate & Barrel, Abercrombie & Fitch, Whole Foods just three weeks ago, Banana Republic, Amazon Go, Anthropologie, And that's the total of 17. I don't know if anybody's been there but these these stores are boarded up I Think it's it's appropriate that we do look at this. I think there are solutions. I think we need a plan Some of the things I think we could do is just raise awareness in Ojai We can Ella we could always elevate shoplifting to agenda items and the City Council We can let the world know that Ojai does not tolerate shoplifting and we will enforce the laws which do allow up to six months.
of jail time and a fine of up to $1,000. They are now misdemeanors they're no longer felonies so they're not pursuing him in San Francisco you know they don't have a large enough police force again I think a lot of some symbolic efforts we take here would really help I mean we could have a 5-0 vote condemning shoplifting is making a statement that it's not welcome here We can do a lot of little things right now before it increases. And I don't know if any of you have been around the state, but it's atrocious.
L.A., San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego and of course if you want to go to Portland try that one. There are more stores closing there than anywhere else. These stores tend to be... this is not a victimless crime.
0:26 – 0:3210 turns
Thank you, Carl. Next we have Leah Hindman, then Jeffrey Starkweather and then Klaus-Peter Fleischmann.
Hi I'm Lee Hindman. So I trust you'll hear what I have to say tonight, and hearing is more important than listening. We're all blessed to live in this paradise valley and in our town of Ojai. And so here we're all connected in a sort of family way. A big dysfunctional family actually. Some have gifts, all have flaws and shortcomings. This meeting is like we're all sitting at a big dinner table with the extended family overflow in the back of the room and we argue and we disagree and we're self-righteous and it gets messy.
And at the core of each of our desires is to express what we believe is the best for Ojai. The voices here tonight are of many who care enough to stand up for the good of our family. You all sitting at the head of the table have the responsibility to represent us and weigh carefully all issues placed before you. You are not granted our power You are granted the position to hear our voices.
We in the back of the room, we hold the power. There's one council member I want you to carefully think about tonight and that is Leslie Rule. The lawsuit thrust upon her is ultimately your responsibility. You all created this. You are to treat her as your family. You are to support her, as you would any other member of this council. So step up, cover the costs of her defense should this frivolous lawsuit proceed or better yet use your back channel contacts to stop this. It's a waste of our time and resources. We have things to solve like homelessness.
Betsy I think you're responsible for much of the shenanigans that have occurred in this council over the past bunch of months. I used to not be involved until I started hearing stuff. If you step down, you'll spare yourself a very unpleasant year because the numbers are ticking up and they are showing that the tide has turned against you. I don't know if you see it but everybody else does so please do not underestimate the power of this large family.
We're just getting started. Thank you.
Thank you, Lee. Next we have Jeffrey Starkweather and then Klaus Peter Fleischman and then Renee Roth
Mayor City Council staff public I want to just kind of follow up on that in some way but in a different different vein. I think we need to start working on stop inviting lawsuits and trying to avoid them An example we're going to have tonight is the housing element issue. We received a letter on February 13th From HCD saying we're not in compliance raising some issues about the Becker properties of Cabrillo parts. My question is why didn't we act on it then?
Then we get a letter from California's for homeownership and March 29th, and they're gonna sue us on May 29th I think it is if we don't get our housing element under control Why didn't we act on it then now we're talking about getting consultants to start working on it We'd have done it then I think we would be less likely to be sued. Another factor here is mentioned about homelessness, we have continually put in under the anti-displacement section of our housing action plan funding help of Ojai's rental assistance program. It is much better to prevent homelessness which is their goal than to have to ameliorate it.
If we don't want to be sued, we should be funding them. The other one is the Reach Code. We know that Berkeley's which is very similar to ours had to do with pumping in gas into buildings and how that violated federal law. I won't get into details of that but it seems like we could be vulnerable to a lawsuit as well but we could solve that problem pretty easily.
The organization that would sue, that would only have standing to sue deals with commercial kitchens. So if we eliminated that requirement on future commercial kitchens, current ones we've exempted, they couldn't sue us because they'd have no standing to sue. Secondly, we could do like the state of New York's doing and just require energy hookups or we can do incentives And third has to do with what was just talked about, this dispute going on about the closed door meetings and suits going back and forth and people complaining to the DA and all that sort of stuff. We're wasting in my opinion a lot of time on that and we could solve that problem really easily to waive the privilege on what happened in those closed door meetings and to implement what the DA asks us to do, which is to tape record our meetings in the future.
That, you know, whoever is at fault or not at fault, that would be past us once that's done and we can start actually working on projects. But are we going to spend the next several months fighting that issue? Let's get it over with. Thank you.
Jeffrey, I have a question. I'm sorry, Mayor. Are you suggesting that we basically own what happened in those closed sessions publicly?
Yeah, let chips fall where they may. That's what I'm suggesting.
Okay, thank you.
And just to confirm we council decided to have a memo produced correct unit
Yeah, council requests the production of a memo regarding the various allegations for product violations etc and Council also requested a workshop to be held on public transparency which is currently scheduled for May 22nd
Great. Thank you Matt. Okay now next we have Klaus Peter Fleischman then Renee Roth and then Clifford Hill
0:32 – 0:4313 turns
Hello. A lot of hardworking people in front of me here, a lot of reading, a lot of agony again. I don't envy you but I have something that I hope can unite, I hope can unite people and that's if you remember from last time when I was here my topic is safety, safety for pedestrians, safety for bicyclists For people with limited mobility, I think we have way too much traffic on the weekends and people are speeding a lot.
That young boy that was here is one of my neighbors and it's really dangerous at certain times I spent a couple of hours actually going into Rachel Lang's neighborhood and I talked to almost all the people about the speed bumps. They work, we don't need, James, we don't need month. It's already established they work. They're wimpy. People go over them. They avoid them because they're not the real speed bumps but they are better than nothing and a lot of people would like to have them to have safer neighborhoods And I asked you to do some soul searching. What can each one of you do to make a difference in terms of safety?
So, in that sense, I think that would be a beginning and then stop signs. I ride a bike everywhere. I have to stop for the roads. It should be the other way around. The bicycle lane should be the right-of-way and the car should stop first. Things like that would make a difference. So I'll keep coming back and feed you ideas. I think safety is something we should all be able to work together on, there shouldn't be a dispute about it.
Okay thank you.
Thank you
class I just wanted to thank you for your comment and also to let you know that when I spoke with the slow down drown group They had amazing suggestions for ways that we can improve safety So I will be following up on I have my I have a whole list of marching orders here. So this is something I really am concerned about and I feel like I'm not alone so Next
we have Renee Roth and Clifford Hill
Good evening members of the council and staff I'm here tonight to kind of talk about overlapping issues One of them is just to reiterate what has already been spoken about We are facing a housing crisis of proportions that I didn't even know were possible. We've had people come up here and talk about having their children, being afraid for their children if they go and play in the park behind City Hall.
because of the homeless population that is there. We've had people come and talk about how they're concerned about the people who are living in their tents behind City Hall, where do they go to the bathroom? Where do they get showers? Where do they put their stuff? How do they get the help they need? I've been doing some research And thankfully, I've gotten some information about this MOU that Matt Levere mentioned and I mentioned it at the last City Council meeting. I mean at the last Planning Commission meeting and Rachel Ling was there and I was appreciative that she was there.
I was made aware of this MOU that the City Council has actually approved and Mayor Betsy Sticks has actually signed. And in that MOU it was passed as a consent item, 33 pages long consent item and it talks about the responsibilities of collaboration and cooperation with Ventura County And their continuum of care. So you've already signed on to it, I was happy to see that, I was happy to read that and James put that on the agenda as a consent item way to go James but does anybody know about it? Does anybody look at it? Is it even acknowledged to exist and in that continuum of care it does say That the city has a responsibility to do certain things in that continuum of care. One of them is to commit to actively participate with the Ventura County Continuum of Care, Another is to develop a crisis response system which includes emergency housing resources for those who present as homeless in their jurisdiction.
The third item, pursue permanent housing units across the continuum of care including transitional, permanent supportive and extremely affordable as enumerated in their housing element of their jurisdiction, of their general plan. So I'm bringing this to your attention because you've signed it. You've put it into law. It is part of what should be the city has a responsibility to provide. Right now, I don't see it in the budget. I don't see a staff person providing those services. The only people I know who are doing it are Help of Ojai. Bless them. Thank you Renee, but I would like to see the city step up and do more I would like to see items in the budget for staff and responsibilities To join and cooperate in meeting our housing needs Thank
You
Renee
and just to clarify for the public the continuum of care receives Funding from the state and the federal government and and they fund help of Ojai So that's how we end up getting it James. You want to
clarify? That's what I just wanted to explain as well so Ventura County, because all the cities are relatively small compared to maybe like a county in a city situation like L.A., almost every city in the county I think except for maybe Oxnard has joined the continuum of care with the idea that it's a regional approach to address homelessness because the reality is that Most of those cities are too small to solve it on their own and don't get funding to solve it on their own. The city does not receive funding, and you know, it's not unusual for a city the size of Ojai, and there are cities like Port Hueneme, Ventura, Santa Paula, Simi Valley that have also signed onto this for that regional approach.
By the city signing on to this MOU, that is what allows Help of Ojai to get funding. So that is how we are helping do our part but I think I'd be careful maybe to sort of caution everybody about the narrative that the city should be funding that. That's not the way it's been set up. The city could always choose to go above and beyond but we are doing our part by meeting all the requirements of the MOU and allowing The agencies in our area to then also be part of that process. So
Thank You James next we have Clifford Hill
I want to talk about being disabled in Ojai and Public restrooms here basically pretty good The public restrooms on the backside of the arcade are in dire need of push buttons, as is the front door of The Duchess which is otherwise a very handicap-friendly restaurant. Rains is a very handicap-friendly store. Bonnie Lou's wish it could be handicap friendly but they'd have to tear down half the building and put in the right bathroom so I guess y'all letting her go for that The push button on the crosswalk at Blanche and Ojai Avenue on south side of the street is beyond my reach.
It's supposed to be flush with the curb, it's not supposed to be 18 inches back from the curb. The Ojai Valley Trail, the signal of Ojai, the place that it is. You walk out the front gate of the Ojai Valley Inn What's the minimum room right now at the Ojai Valley Inn? Six bills a
night?
And in the first 300 feet that guest walks toward town, oh there's about 100 feet of cracked up pavement and shit that they could break an ankle on or whatever. And as you proceed on down the trail between Signal and Ventura it's If you're not paying attention, you're going to trip and fall especially if you're old or whatever. Heading further west the stretch through the park is pretty damn nice and the next stretch down towards Fox is very nice.
But once you get to Fox, there's a culvert at the bottom of the grave when you go down. The surface getting to the bridge over the culvert on both sides is garbage. It's dirt, it's irregular. I've almost tipped there a couple times. Proceeding east on the Ojai Valley Trail just before you get to Bryant, I believe, There's about 25, 30 feet of busted up stuff that's all painted with yellow stripes and stuff.
None of this stuff is expensive to fix. I don't understand. And especially that stretch outside of the Ojai Valley Inn. You got these long dollar people coming here, you want them to spend money? Oh remember they're gonna sue the city because they tripped on the crosswalk. What else can I say? We've got 10 seconds. Ojai is the most beautiful place I have ever lived in my entire life, and I've been...
0:43 – 0:5333 turns
Thank you Clifford. Any comments online? Weston?
Yes Mayor we have one raised hand. Becky? Becky you have the floor.
Thank You Weston can you hear me?
Yes, go ahead.
Thank you. In response to the woman who wants to defend Leslie Rule and seeks to point the finger of blame at Mayor Sticks, the lawsuit by citizens to protest Leslie Rules potential violation of the Brown Act is not frivolous and it needs to be heard in the court of law rather than in the court of public opinion such as the Ojai Valley News social media and city council meetings.
Contrary to the previous speaker's assertions, the majority of citizens do not support Ms. Rules' unruly, uncivil and possibly unlawful behavior. She may have put the city and taxpayers at risk, and if she has she needs to be held accountable. She is not the hero she and others want to paint her to be. The city and taxpayers may in fact, be her victims. It is inappropriate for the city to agree to pay for her legal expenses before the matter has been adjudicated in the courts.
If she has broken the law, paying her legal bills is akin to asking an assault victim to pay for the legal expenses of her perpetrator. I look forward to the Brown Act workshop on May 22nd and hope everyone will attend. I also look forward to the matter of rules alleged violation of the Brown Act being heard in the courts rather than allowing her and others to manipulate minds in the court of public opinion. Thank you.
Thank
you, Becky. Anything else, Weston? No
more, Mayor.
Okay, we will move on to the consent calendar. I have several public comments on the consent calendar. Anything like to be pulled?
I'd like to pull H but can we see, can we pull all the items that there's
a comment on? Yeah, we have comments on B, G, H and I.
So shall we approve?
Yeah.
I
would
like to pull B.
OK all right we just OK so we're going to pull B, G, H, I and H and take public comment on those. B,
D, B,G,H,I.
All right. We'll begin with item number B. We have Larry Steingold Item B is the city of Ojai warrants.
Regarding the invoice for legal fees for Mr. Summers law firm, is it possible to see the breakdown of the invoices? To see which one is for each one for which legal issue. Is it for simply Ojai lawsuit? Is it for the closed session? Is it for a lawsuit on daily, whatever they're forth because they're broken down obviously the $30,000 is broken down something something something something It's not just a blanket invoice I'm assuming because most law firms are 11 and a half minutes or whatever they do here based on that. So if that's possible, or do I have to go to a public records request to see what invoices make up the 30 grand every month versus what they're applied to? Such as the things that we're being sued for, all these activities. Who do we blame for all the legal bills Because he's defending and he's also Helping you people avoid issues and write laws and do all these things.
And that's great because that's So is it possible to do that or how do we do that?
Yeah, mr. City Attorney, do you want to comment on that I
So the bills in full are available to the council without redaction in full. As to the members of the public, the council could direct by majority vote providing an item-by-item summary X thousand of this lawsuit, x thousand of that lawsuit. The full bill is attorney-con privilege because they detail slip by slip what I do for the council and my colleagues.
The Public Records Act request can also be filed but note that again that will redact off anything that's privileged which includes for a lawsuit that is pending under existing Supreme Court case law the amount of money spent on the lawsuit is privileged and protected because it would reveal strategy. A high bill in one month before a big deadline reveals to the plaintiff or the opposing party what may be coming.
The council, however, could by majority vote direct more information to be provided so I would need majority direction from the council to provide more information.
Mayor, I have requested this information in the past and so I am still hoping to get it. I guess I would get the full version but I would like us to put an item on the agenda that we discuss and approve releasing what information we possibly can When we get to discussion on the warrant, I also intend to discuss legal fees. And when we get to the budget, I think it's also a place to discuss legal fees. So I'm hoping that the council will agree To once we go through the budget and we take a look That we will agree that the public has a right to know the amount That we are spending on legal fees whether or not We break it down item by item at least to know will give us a
sense I would like Item per item for lawsuit versus lawsuit versus lawsuit Yes as much as we can well, I mean obvious because he's gonna pay him. Well, you know I
All
right.
Thank you, Larry. As much as I can, you know? As much as I can. Yeah. Sousa, do
you have a question? To give direction because I'm in favor of providing more information.
Well future agenda items are at the end of the meeting. There could be any time.
Well, that's my question. It
can be at any time I can make a suggestion that may solve this problem and find support from the majority of the council But I would prefer to wait until we've gone through public comment not to take the public's time The council improving the warrants could direct More information to be provided with the next set of warrants and I can make a suggestion to that front That may meet this need but I would want to do so with the appropriate time when the council is considering the warrants
We'll finish public comment then. We have a Tisha Morris on G establishing an outdoor flagpole display policy
Good evening council I actually hear out of the spirit of appreciation that this item is on the consent calendar This is for the approving the pride flag for Pride Month and For those who don't know me, I'm married to Councilmember Rachel Ling And I want to take a moment just to recognize her as the first openly elected LGBTQ member of Ojai in our history. I think that's an important milestone that needs to be recognized, it's gotten a little overshadowed with this new council but I want to take that moment.
Rachel and I moved to Ojai because of its small town charm, all the things that we all love about it, the arts and also its inclusivity. We've been shocked to receive hate mail that was directed specifically for us being lesbians. The first was in a kind of serial killer handwriting of no lesbies allowed here. The next one was a little more on the passive-aggressive side.
Anonymous writer, however they did include their return address which is a little confusing and referred to me as the wife which you know maybe that's better than the husband I don't know Proceeded to kind of imply that we shouldn't live in a nice house or have a white poodle. Again, confused because maybe he presents feminine? I'm not sure. Anyway, we were told to go away.
But my concern here, to be serious is that it's for the kids, the teens, the young adults who go to school and are subjected to bullying every day and hate slurs that I can even imagine that they have to endure every day We obviously live in a very divisive climate, more so than ever. And the minority feels emboldened to voice their non-inclusive in threatening ways. And so I think it's more important than ever that Ojai really represent what I know is to be the proud majority of our city.
The flag is not just a performative exercise because it's the thing you do, it really shows the kids that we have their back at a time like this. So I just I wanna thank you for doing that.
Thank you, Tisha. Next we will move on to H on the consent calendar which is the housing element, the sixth cycle housing element. First we have Jeffrey Starkweather then Steve Quillacy and then Bill Miley.
0:53 – 1:0514 turns
Jeffrey Starkwether. I just have a real short comment Whatever we do and whether we use the consultant or however, we go about Getting our housing element in compliance The Planning Commission which I'm a member of but I haven't been there that long though. I know Steve Willis He's been there a long time Every meeting we deal with the housing code, the municipal code that deals with housing and land use.
And we have more experience than anybody besides our Community Development Director who is very experienced in dealing with this thing. We have talked about for some time about the need which Housing and Community Development has called for, and it's in that letter. And we've committed to as part of our housing action plan to eliminate barriers that are part of our code.
So I hope whoever works on this if you hire a consultant they actually work with the planning commission because if you look at our housing element and our action plan it actually lists the Planning Commission equally with Community Development Department with responsibility for carrying out these tasks, one of which is to eliminate those barriers. So thank you.
Thank you Jeffrey. Next we have Steve Quillacy then Bill Miley and then Dee Reed.
Good evening mayor, council members and staff. I have a few questions about this housing update. First of all isn't bringing the housing element of the general plan into compliance with state law and regulations something that Ramey & Associates should already be doing under their existing contract to update the general plan? Why does the city need to hire another consultant?
Second, I have read in this week's online edition of the Ojai Valley News a letter from Californians for Homeownership which Jeffrey mentioned briefly threatening to sue the city over the housing elements non-compliance with the deadline three weeks from today. This letter encloses three letters from the State Housing and Community Development Department. Letters to the city dated 2021, 2022 and 2023 all citing specific pieces of the housing element as being non-compliant.
The Planning Commission has been told that HCD is only looking for, quote, minor corrections to the housing element. But these letters sound more serious. Third, the Planning Commission has over the space of three years reviewed most of the zoning code and we have recommended about 200 separate changes To title 10 chapter 2, that's the zoning code. For City Council approval, none of which have come before you for your review yet and for which I greatly feel sad.
But we since we are all volunteers our time in this effort has cost the city exactly 0. 4th As Jeffrey mentioned, the Planning Commission has also discussed the housing element at length over many meetings and many individual cases. More recently even talking about objective versus subjective development standards in the Ojai Municipal Code. And that's cited in your staff report.
So I'm asking, when will the Planning Commission be allowed to formally review and deliberate on these critiques from HCD? And more importantly, help modify the housing element to be compliant. It's what we did previously on the General Plan's vision and goals and the Housing Element Goals and Programs. We're here to help. Won't cost you $20,000. Thank you.
Thank you, Steve. Appreciate that and just to clarify for the public out of all the jurisdictions in California 40% of the jurisdictions are currently not in compliance with HCD so that is a pretty large chunk of California.
Mayor if I could just sort of speak to a couple points because Mr. Quillacy gave some excellent segues Mr. Quilicy just talked about subjective versus objective standards, and then talked about the lengthy process and the amount of times we've reviewed it and resubmitted it to try to meet objective versus subjective standards. And I think all of what Mr. Quilicy said is very true, and I think it also is why we're very frustrated with the process.
At some level we're trying to figure out another Another action we can take to try to get this across the finish line. We're hearing from Other agencies and from HCD themselves that there are other cities that are in this spot that the housing element This this is maybe my opinion But the the point of the housing element has changed from a planning exercise to not just a planning exercise anymore and so we have reviewed The housing element. We've submitted the housing element. We revised the housing element and we are still getting sort of subjective requirements that we have to meet And we want to try to push it across the finish line and I think that the other point I want to make is what Mr. Quillacy said and it speaks to sort of the tension because I hear this from a lot of people of well, why aren't we rushing?
And why aren't we just resubmitting but at the same time everybody wants to be part of the review process and every you know We want we have to bring it to the council and then there's the question if does it go to the Commission and others So at this point our approach is we are trying to get the revisions, the most recent revisions. We are planning to bring those to Council on May 23rd. My recommendation will be to try to get that adopted and submitted as soon as possible for the reasons Mr. Quillacy mentioned that there is a group who does this for a living they threatened to sue cities that aren't into compliance to collect the fees And so I would like to get into compliance as soon as possible to avoid that and I think Staff if we're doing our jobs, that's what we should be trying to do So we are gonna bring it on May 23rd.
That doesn't preclude anybody from you know in the meantime We can also have the Planning Commission We can continue to review the housing programs that they've started to review. We can still do other work simultaneously, but for us, for all the reasons mentioned we are trying to get into compliance as soon as possible and really it's just to maintain the key phrase that we all should remember is maintain local control.
Anybody who lives in Ojai should want Ojai to be able to make decisions about what is in Ojai and It's a little weird that that seems to be maybe changing a little bit but I think that the majority of the community feels that way and I think that we're gonna do what we can to try to make sure that Ojai makes decisions about Ojai not the state of California Who we have not historically trusted to make decisions for the city of Ojai. So so with that We're planning to bring it May 23rd
Three other quick points to add to that. The plan, the document that we intend to bring back to the council on May 23rd at this time is not anticipated to include any adjustments to the sites list, the SPL overlay zone list because in all of their comments From every different HCD reviewer, and bear that in mind as noted in the staff report. Every time it goes to HCD we get a new round of comments with a new reviewer and a new perspective. It's a difficult agency to work with but nowhere in there have they asked, have they made comments so far Regarding any change in the S bill overlay zone sites list. So that's coming forward as originally approved Recommended for approval rather by the Planning Commission and approved by the council passed The adjustments are to the remainder of the element particularly the housing in the housing programs and converting In a nutshell converting things like we'll consider two will study or will consider two Will within three years review and approve revised standards things like that concretizing our existing housing programs and the prior elements A second is on the lawsuit deadline.
Note that the group Californians for Homeownership is not a group that has historically fought for, to use a colloquial term, the little guy. They are funded by the California Association of Realtors and that's apparent in their IRS documents. They're fully funded by them and by their attorney's fees wins and they have sued a number of cities in Southern California and now starting to go Northern California as well so we are not afraid of them. We already prepared to fight them exactly as hard as the Council directs us to fight, but we are also cognizant of the need to avoid yet another lawsuit and hence the push is to May 23rd so that the Council can adopt it ahead of their false and improperly imposed deadlines. Thank you
Thank you, Matt. Thank you, James. I just want to add one thing. I've been meeting for the last couple of years with a group of local electives about California Local Electives about housing and I hear the same comments made consistently. A lot of frustration, a lot of subjective versus objective questions which makes sense if 40% of the jurisdictions are not being accepted at this point.
Susan did you want to comment?
Is it true, you know people keep saying that we've not had any new housing in 30 years. Now when they say that does that refer to projects like with Spring Oaks or just single-family homes? What does that mean no new housing in 30 years?
So in short, that's a false statement. The city has approved several new housing units in the last 30 years something around 50 plus. 50
new single family
homes? No I said new housing units.
What does that
mean? Housing units means any individual unit four walls and a roof or part thereof that someone can live in much of that 50 plus units that have been approved have been ADUs both new ADUs and new excessive dwelling units and existing ADUs legalized On the housing statistics, we count it by units. Now if you break it out to types of units most of them have been ADUs. The city has approved some new single-family homes I don't have that number off the top my head but it's something in the over 30 years low tens yeah we can get over 30 years less
than 10
1:05 – 1:1634 turns
No, low 10s. So somewhere between 10 and 30? I don't have the precise number off the top of my head but somewhere between 10 and 30 new single-family homes and then I think that the number that folks are referring to is a limited amount of apartments approved in that window. That would be what we haven't seen much of although Whispering Oaks would be somewhere around 30ish years ago.
I forget the exact date off the top of my head.
Since we're having, while I understand that the housing element has gone, the purpose behind it has gone from planning to actually doing even though we aren't required To do whether or yes we would like to keep local control but right now we don't have a compliant or even substantially compliant housing element which has resulted in two builders remedies and suits under three thirty which is ministerial approval. Of of units and I am under the impression that if we do not, I mean the state is saying.
Sorry Council Member, can we finish public comment before we move
on to discussion? Yeah, I would like to
except
for when we started the conversation.
No, I think we should too. I don't even know why this is on the consent rather than agenda but anyway. That's what I was going
to talk
about.
For sure go
ahead. Okay next we have Bill Miley then Dee Reed and then Renee Roth.
For the record, my name is Bill Miley. I think the issue in the past 30 years we've had no affordable housing developments for last 20 years. It seems to me that the reason we're here tonight on this issue is that there were public comments sent to the State Housing and Community Development Department about the housing element, and what was going on. That seems to me the reason we're here.
So because this relates to the potential loss of zoning control if it's not approved, the public should really know what the correspondence to the state is, was. And it's all about the cycle six housing element document and its revisions. So I urge the council to make all such correspondence Public now, so we know what you're talking about. You know, builder's remedy or whatever?
Now that I know you can write to state, I'm going to do that too because I have questions about what goes on and I've been involved in three cycles That goes back maybe 15 years, 20 years. So let's get that correspondence public and become transparent so we know what we're talking about.
Thank you.
Hello all. Thank you for getting this off the consent agenda, which is part of what I want to speak about and answer about the question that people keep talking about only 50 houses or only 30 units or whatever. I think what we tend to be referring to most the time is deed restricted, which is rare. So, I do want to talk about the process. I don't have a strong opinion about whether you should spend 20 grand to hire a consultant to get you over the finish line, to make it look like you're doing something when you maybe really are not and I don' care if 40% of California is having the same problem you are. I doubt they're giving their City Council three weeks notice on a lawsuit. I doubt they're giving the public an agenda item with no attachments So I think it's disappointing and scandalous that you intended to sweep this one under the rug as a consent agenda item to begin with.
Thanks to the Ojai Valley News, we now know what it's really about. The seemingly innocuous memo on an update on the housing element status is actually a hell of a lot more than that. And there's a whole lot information that was withheld from the public and some of it from the council. The memo that raises more questions than answers. It turns out that it reveals that the housing element, the same one that was secretly adopted on another consent agenda at your very first meeting, good way to get going in December It's not just, it's not full of minor flaws. It's really about the fact that the state is saying that they are not ready to certify it, not even close and that somebody's on the verge of suing us and there's others talking about development developers solution whatever it is.
So now, here's the spoiler alert. We have yet another lawsuit pending and further state scrutiny. I've lost count of how many lawsuits there are since this new administration came to power and how much money the city will spend to defend the indefensible including putting up barriers to affordable housing instead of working in public to address a serious problem and possibly improve the lives of people who work here.
So why should we care about this? Because homelessness and a lack of affordable housing is a statewide problem. It's a serious problem across California, and it's now here in our own community. But some of you think that Ojai is just too precious to care about permitting new homes or apartments for people who work under our noses. Now we're beginning to see just how costly your pausing of the Becker Development Agreement and your penchant for secrecy and foot-dragging on the Cabrillo proposal, and others is going to turn out to be for taxpayers. Instead of kindness and transparency I hope that we can have and we now have an ongoing cover up of what needs to be done.
I'm here to ask you to stop making major policy decisions behind the scenes. That is neither kind nor transparent nor democratic Let's get it right by working together in public for the common good, not just for the people you think voted for you. Thank you.
Thank you, Dee. And just to clarify, Cabrillo got their plans in and it will go through the planning commission. That's the process correct?
Once there is a complete application, yes. They've submitted an application. It's under review must go through the process not on tonight's agenda will be coming to Planning Commission and probably City Council. No comments is my recommendation on the merits of that application. That's not yet before the city
does the process. OK,
Renee Roth. Thank you, Mayor Betsy. And so am I correct in hearing now that this has been removed from the consent agenda? Is that correct?
It's been pulled
from the consent agenda.
Okay,
then I will try to keep my comments a little bit briefer but as we all know the state of California is coming down hard on cities who avoid growth and development. Specifically, development of housing and more specifically affordable housing. Ojai is one of those cities. We have a mark on the state of California that says we are not for housing okay? It's big and everybody sees it A vocal and politically active group have helped Mayor Betsy get elected, who oppose any new growth and development.
And would rather sue the city in defiance to stop any growth and development. Hence the lawsuits. Hence the referendums. Let's talk about this really, the elephant in the room. This is really what we need to be talking about. Mayor has sticks has said she opposed the Becker project and should be recusing herself from all items relating to housing Going forward giving her campaign supporters and managers who are leading the effort to sue this city I'm sorry, but I have to say it People might not know it or understand it. But that's what's going on By placing the adoption of the housing element on the agenda as a consent item It appears the city manager and Mayor Stix are trying to sneak in approval of the housing element for $20,000 of special consulting time without public scrutiny and public input.
This smells fishy! And appears to bypass council member scrutiny and transparency and review by the community. Another attempt by Mayor Sticks to create a back room deal, I ask? I'm sorry but I don't trust you. I really don't. So as far as I'm concerned the real issue Is the lack of affordable housing, we vilified developers and haven't done it in years. It's really very predictable California style local control segregationist zoning to keep undesirables out results in Housing prices and homelessness, that is very predictable.
So I suggest you do your best and step up and try to address the development and growth that is needed in our community in a healthy, responsible, sustainable way. Thank you very much.
Thank you Renee. I just wanted to add, just to remind folks that at the Becker Agreement as proposed we lose more low-income housing than we actually be gaining from that and it also does not comply with CEQA laws so
So
just a second, excuse me, excuse me Mayor. That is not true and this is not the place we're having discussion so that has not been litigated. That is once again I think to Renee's point your opinion and you say it as though it's fact and that hence is why she asks you to recuse yourself from these kinds of discussions. That that is what the basis of the lawsuit is That is the basis of the lawsuit. That
has not been decided. Mayor and Council, we've had a point in the counterpoint. Please refrain from further discussion of a project that's not on the agenda.
Okay let's continue. Attorney are you running this meeting? Are
you
running
this meeting? I provide legal advice recommending to my client... I'm running the meeting and
we are going to continue. Council member
Rule, are
you running this meeting Can we have quiet please so people can
hear go ahead James
1:16 – 1:2222 turns
I'd just like to clarify, I think the last two speakers talked about the impropriety of putting the approval of the housing element on the consent agenda. And I just want to clearly state that's not what's on the agenda. What's on the agenda is a status update with a request from Council to approve additional resources to get the housing element adopted It's a very basic item and is appropriate for the consent calendar. And so like I said earlier, we're gonna bring the approval on May 23rd and that'll be a discussion item. So just to speak to that concern that we keep hearing. Okay thank you.
Okay thank you. We have two more comments on the consent
calendar. Can we make all correspondence related to this public
Well, so there's a couple points there that I can get to. But you know the comment that we aren't being transparent because we're not providing the public comments sent to the state and I will note that we have requested the public comments from the state as well. The comment about it not being transparent is being inappropriately placed towards the city. They are comments of the state. So the states the people that hold those comments.
So we can provide what we've received but we don't have everything because we're not
But this will be back on the agenda May 23rd for further discussion.
It will be on the agenda for the council to consider adopting a revised housing element on May 23.
And you don't need our permission to spend the $20,000 so that's not what you're asking for with this item?
It's on top of prior approvals for the contract so it is at a level where the council needs to approve it
So we do have a contract as Mr. Quilici said, we have a contract with our general plan update team to do the housing element update so this is an additional $20,000 potentially
It feels like we have no choice now, but to do it in order to meet the deadline. I wish we could've avoided it. Correct.
And the deadline is not the state's deadline. It is a falsely imposed deadline by a group that sued cities out of sport. But that said again, we're trying to avoid another needless lawsuit. Okay, thank you. With that, I'd recommend we take the last two public commenters and then return to the council for discussion on the consent
items. We have one comment on D, citizens option for public safety funding. That's Renee Roth.
Excuse me. I'm not this item's been pulled so we can have a discussion on it. Is that correct?
Yeah, counselor We just have two more public comments on consent Are you okay with just taking those two and then we'll come back to oh sure. Okay. Sure This is on D citizens option for public safety funding
I want to say that I wanted to make a plea that this public safety funding be used to address the needs of our homeless community. And I sent a letter of that explaining why and how I think it should be used Our police are our frontline first level responders to the homeless crisis, and when things break out and things are destructive. And things happen in our homeless community.
I would like to see this $100,000 which is to be used for community support and engagement. Be used to address ways to address our housing community. Maybe we can find places for people to store their limited items in a place or a way that would be protected so we don't have our police department Grabbing the blankets and towels and the ID and the wallets and all that stuff, and it goes to the police department and it goes in a big heap. And nobody can find stuff I've seen it, I've heard it. I've heard it over and over again.
That that frontline interface be improved and respected and have collegial responsive training and Best practices from other cities on how they're dealing with this issue as part of our public safety money. Thank you
Thank you, Renee. All right last comment is on I Brian Eakins I is the ratifying the appointment to vacancy on the Historic Preservation Commission
Mayor, thank you for that but I feel like covered that in the commissioner comments.
Thank you very much. All right any comments online Weston?
None on zoom mayor.
Okay let's move on to discussion then. Can i ask a question
about the last uh the consent item for the public safety funding that can include what Renee said about addressing homeless issues is that correct it isn't i'm looking at the description of what it can include What the funds can be used for and it just it says You know at the top of page 1 2 what we can use the funding for is
Yeah, I would suggest if there's a desire to revisit that that we just pull the item and bring it back at a later time. But I will note the chief and I met in the recommendation is what we think the police department needs at this point most importantly so which is the funding for the part-time sheriff service technician and funding for the Ojai Police Special Enforcement detail. That is our recommendation. If you want us to if the council wants us to Thank you.
1:22 – 1:3111 turns
Increasing and so it feels appropriate to at least discuss if we can you because because the police are already involved with the homeless and maybe We can designate some of this funding to something as simple as storage lockers, for example I Support that too Okay
Yeah, we can bring it back. Okay. Thank you. Microphone?
Sorry to that point. Could we also look at At I Don't mean to complicate everything this might be complicating but to look at what Klaus mentioned about speed speed bumps or never mind You know what? We'll do that it will
And I would just point out, you know things like speed humps things like storage lockers if they're really priorities We should be paying for those from our budget. I wouldn't Just I don't recommend taking our cops funding for those but that's something the council can consider
Okay,
okay comments
on consent. I Think that Safety in Ojai and I think Klaus Peter is correct. It is the one thing that we can all come behind I think we know that biking is dangerous. I think we know that crossing Ojai Ave is dangerous. I think we know that speeders are You know, on dark streets at night is dangerous. I think that there are a lot of safety concerns to address and I don't know what that big umbrella is but I hear it all the time in various ways. This isn't safe. That isn't safe.
I want to start by saying thank you to all of you for being here today. I cross the street on 150 and I don't feel safe. I drive the street on 150, and I don't feel safe. And when that blinking light at Fox was there for the time that it was there, it slowed traffic down quite a bit. It just wasn't a straight thoroughfare. So I even told people, I thought it was permanent because it was a basically low cost way to slow the traffic down. Anyway, I think we need to have a large discussion around safety in Ojai and maybe part of the general plan as concerns other things as well but I would second that it is a big, big issue here.
And then of course, yeah and I have comments also on other consent items at the time that it is my turn. Thank you
James any comments on the safety? Factor in the general plan. I know that's definitely
no and I open in there My only point they are very important topics their priorities My point is just that the the item is for just the cops funding the cops grant funding so my point was that we were trying to prioritize that funding for An area that that funding can only be, or for something that can only be funded through that funding source. Whereas the things like streets improvements we'll get to the budget in a minute but we've doubled our street maintenance budget, or we're proposing doubling our street maintenance budget so that we can start doing those things and paying for those from our city funds which is in my opinion what we should have always been doing But when times got tough, those things got pulled out. We're trying to put them back in now and so they're all important.
We can bring an item and we will have items as part of the general plan update to discuss these things and then we'll come back and maybe bring some ideas for funding those versus funding the COPS grant programs.
Okay, thank you. All right, let's move on to discuss item H and just a reminder as James said that this is Just an update on the sixth cycle and to authorize staff to contract with a specialist to As needed to ensure state certification So that's all it is. It's so we're focused anyone like to Leslie
I understand the need to move quickly with the housing element, but what occurs to me through all of these comments are that the citizens of Ojai have no idea about what is in the housing element. What it means? What we need to do? So whether or not we move forward and we get a compliant housing element, we still have a large contingent of citizens who are very interested and concerned about affordable housing. And maybe they realize or maybe they don't realize that this housing element is all about And I think that the citizens, Watch out for what's coming off the governor's desk. It was clear then and now it's beyond clear, it has now become addictive from the state on what we must do yet the citizenry is completely unaware really of how strongly the state has put their hand on what we must do and I think it's really important That people know what Builders Remedy is.
People know that the Becker Project and Cabrillo have filed Builders Remedy, and what that's going to mean. And otherwise we are keeping from the public that which they need to know. They need to understand what the state is mandating of us and asking of us to contribute to the housing problem in California. So I would like at some point that we have a workshop to that end.
For my district, I have set up a May 25th housing forum on affordable housing in Ojai where I will delve into the most relevant laws and Builders remedy what it means how we need to think about it because I find that the citizenry does not know and It is a major import to everybody whether or not you want Affordable housing built or whether or not. You don't want affordable housing built you can't make an informed choice if you don't know what the context is in which you are working and So I would like at some point to have the city take control of that particular item and inform the citizenry of what exactly the state is doing right now about affordable housing.
We've talked about it many times, James. But even here people who are very interested really don't understand what it is. So anyway on May 25th, At six o'clock, Ken Hall. We're going to talk about affordable housing in Ojai. So thank you and then finally I have to say Mayor and this was the result and I apologize if I jumped in. You said as fact that the Becker agreement did not follow CEQA. That is the nature of the lawsuit actually you have to be careful. Actually I said as proposed As proposed, but that is what is being litigated. I understand that. Okay so we have to be really careful on how we say those things because you sit here at the head of this council saying things as though they're fact and I know that you believe that which is why people have asked you to recuse yourself from dealings with that.
So I think that I would like you just to seriously reflect I'm going to go ahead and get started. Thank you very much.
1:31 – 1:4622 turns
at a previous council meeting, and that we were gonna bring in experts in the field to talk about this. And that we actually said that we were gonna make it a priority. Has that been scheduled or has that been?
No I think it's one of six pending workshops that were approved. So the first workshop we're scheduling is May 22nd, the transparency workshop. That does take some significant resources to prepare So once we get that one done, then we'll start working on the other five workshops.
And if I could jump in with an additional point on that at this time The schedule on the housing element is to have the housing element come for the City Council discussion item on May 23rd There isn't time unless the council directs otherwise To accomplish a workshop between now and then but what we would expect is the housing workshop would follow the adoption of the housing element And its focus can be, in part, strategies for the implementation process where the meat and the merits are on how to put into practice all of the promises made in the housing element as drafted regarding affirmatively furthering fair housing and promoting affordable housing development. And how the council wishes to do that.
And one other clarification if I can make in the vein of precise facts, Becker has not applied for any builder's remedy applications. They've submitted pre-applications which is legally distinct from an application No applications have been filed by Becker or Ojai Bungalows or Greenwich LLC regarding any of those projects. And that item is, of course, pending before the voters on the March 25th 2024 ballot and we will await the decision of the community.
Also again regarding precision as an institution, the City Council has never declared that it does not have a substantially complied housing element. I realize that is the opinion of at least one member But as an institution, the city's position has been and will continue to be unless otherwise directed by majority of the council that it's adopted housing element as adopted in October of 2021. As revised in December of 2022 and is proposed for re-adoption on March May 23rd of this year in next week or two weeks is compliant with all laws. Thank you
Can I have to respond? I'm sorry, the city can say whatever it wants. The state has said it is not compliant So thank you very much the council can vote on anything they want and call anything anything they want But right now it is the state that determines whether or not we have a substantially compliant housing element unless I am completely wrong on that And that is the basis of all of this is the state has said as we were We were It has been in discussion, are we sure? I have asked this question. Are we sure we have a substantially compliant housing element and I have been told yes but the state has said no.
The state has said no so we can say what we will and I'm all for the City Council saying we have a substantially compliant housing element And in that vein, I think that you're dismissing a potentially very strong lawsuit against us by an outside force by saying that they're doing this for sport undermines the seriousness of why they're doing it and what the ramifications of that will be. So I appreciate your position on that but I don't think they're doing it for sport.
Thank you.
Final comment if I may on my end. The state's administrative staff have made that statement, there has been no final non-appealable judgment of any court that the city is not in compliance There is a distinction there between the different parts of the state and that's a critical distinction. Thank you.
Rachel let it go Matt I'm just going to
let it go. Quiet please Rachel. I just have one one question and one comment and that is you know with these kinds of lawsuits where are the kinds of things that we would talk about in closed session?
Absolutely.
And and it has been difficult for us to have closed session meetings so would I be correct in saying that there is information that you're privy to, that we don't have because of the nature of the relationships on this dais?
The council has I think all the documentary information. It's a matter of the full discussion and analysis and certainly we're happy to have a closed session discussion mindful of the importance of keeping closed sessions closed
Okay,
all right. Thank you well what item did you pull?
Yeah,
so that's off So is there is there a motion we need to vote
on all of the items unless there's other
yeah Andy I just wanted to comment on that last item So I did hear some statements that were Anti-affordable housing that this group this body majority is anti affordable housing there have been exactly two measures that have come before us for a vote on affordable housing. The first one was the Becker Development Agreement And our decision there was to vote either to reject the agreement and thereby put an end, potentially face litigation for doing so but put an end of the developer agreement. And instead we voted to send it to the voters unanimously.
The only other affordable housing matter that's come before us Was the rent stabilization ordinance and Three of us voted. Yes, and two of us voted to abstain so I think it's You know, subject to debate. You know who's in favor of doing good things for affordable housing on this dais and who is not? I think we're going to do good things when we get the chance to do it. I also would say that there's a big difference between saying we haven't built affordable housing an knowing what affordable housing projects have been brought forward Were they approved or rejected? And if they were rejected, what was the reason that they were rejected?
I think that just about every project that I can remember in the 33 years that I've been a resident here in Ojai and paying attention. That projects brought forward by Cabrillo were approved on North Montgomery. They were approved, I don't know who brought the project behind what is currently Ojai Beverage Company but that was approved so when a project comes in front of us historically the City Council has voted to approve projects that were predominantly affordable housing.
What often gets challenged is projects which are 80% market housing and 20% affordable housing because the economics and the impacts of that on the community are significant. And because by building 80% market rate housing, we're potentially eliminating in the future our ability to build affordable housing. So I take offense to people who say that we're no growth, against growth.
I'm 100% in favor of doing good things that impact Ojai residents. As long as the projects that come forward to us make sense, are economically feasible, are sustainable for our community then I think they're all going to get a fair hearing and you know I resent the campaign to say that we're down on housing
Thank you. I would just like to echo Councilmember Whitman's comments. I am also very pro-housing for very low, extremely low, acutely low income households and for helping the people who really need help in our community. And actually we have an item that we're just about to talk about About a truly low-income housing. I think it's also really important for the community to understand that the word affordable Has been co-opted in some form so according to the state of California something can be affordable and still for a family of four they can make up to $120,000 a year And so that rent can turn out to be $3,500 a month. For many members of our community that is not accessible. So to call that affordable according to the state, that's one thing but according to our community I would say that's a different number.
So I think that's really important to keep in mind. Yes?
I'm hoping that during our workshop we can actually discuss You know for four people making a hundred thousand you can have it 20 20 that it is it is Wage, it is you know. Well, that's two kids and two adults maybe to you know Maybe at a hundred they we can talk about that But we really should talk about those numbers and how you how they actually play out there were talking about households not a single person making $100,000 but potentially two people We need to delve into that as well and not just skim off the top. Well, nobody makes the average median income and really figure out what those numbers look like. What a very low income looks like but a low income looks like for a two wage earner household.
So anyway, I'm going to get off of that but it just once again brings back the point that the citizenry in order to make informed decisions need to understand how these things work because they're not immediately accessible.
I completely agree with you and that's why I think a rent disclosure ordinance would be super helpful for our community. Well any other comments on consent? Can we have a motion to approve
consent? I'll second the motion. All in
favor? Okay, all right. Thank you very much. All right, we will move on to discussion item number two 408 North Montgomery Street affordable housing partnership with Habitat for Humanity Timely James we have a presentation
Yes, thank you Mayor. And we have in attendance today our hopeful partners with Habitat for Humanity. Darcy Taylor is here today and I will introduce him in a moment and I believe he's also brought some of the designer team as well but just a little bit of background. Some may recall that about a year ago in April of 2022 The city entered into a letter of engagement with Habitat for Humanity. The city owns a property at 408 Montgomery Street.
We had been trying for years to figure out a way to build some affordable housing there. Part of the problem, part of the challenge right now is even with land being free it's still very hard to actually build housing that is truly affordable And so we had met with different partners for years, going back literally years to try to figure out how to do that.
We sort of had put the project on pause and then we just so happened to cross paths with Darcy from Habitat for Humanity and we realized that we thought there was the potential for a partnership for Habitat to work with the city There's a lot of things that appeal to us about it. Habitat obviously are experts in the field, they have an excellent reputation and also the whole concept and the idea of community build I think is very exciting for our community so we entered into a letter of engagement whereby Habitat was obtained a designer to develop different styles of buildings.
And they have prepared two different styles of options and I think the last point that I'll make before I turn it over is that, I had heard a little bit that this process typically kind of confuses the community In this situation, the city is the property owner and we are designing the property that we potentially will build. It's a little bit different than our normal process which is an applicant comes into the city and submits an application and goes through planning commission and public hearings and those types of things.
So, at this point the question for us is you know are we moving forward with one of these designs and if so which one? We've talked about this a couple of times and each time we said we like a couple designs but we are at the point where we would need to pick a design to move forward. And once that happens, assuming council chooses a design, assuming council gives the green light to go ahead. We then would move forward with final agreement analysis of the costs and all of those things and the whole planning commission review process so I just wanted to say that as I heard some concern that this hadn't gone to Planning Commission yet, but it's because the nature of this is us as property owners looking at our property.
So with that, I will turn it over to Darcy. I have a couple of slides. I'm not sure if you want those up or if you wanna speak for a moment? Darcy, can you come up please? Darcy. Can you come up for the...
1:46 – 1:5813 turns
Come on up, Darcy!
The good news is everybody wants you here.
We love you, Darcy. Thank you. So does my wife by the way. I brought RRM Design who is our long-term design company we've been working with them for over 20 years We've gone through a couple of designs for James and we think we've landed on a couple that I think are very exciting. Affordable addresses a lot of the issues that we're hearing about tonight, and our hope is that we can take the next steps that James has talked about.
I want Lauren to kind of walk you through the two concepts that we have. And then if you have any questions about any of the issues surrounding these concepts, we'll come back up.
Good evening Mayor, Council and public. My name is Lorne Hinkle. I'm an architect with RRM Design Group and I'm extremely proud to be working with Darcy and Habitat for Humanity to provide housing and specifically quality, dignified affordable housing. We've been working with James and his staff over the last year on and off to come up with a couple of concepts for different opportunities at the site at 408 Montgomery.
The first on your screen is a townhouse Concept it provides four homes two bedrooms one and a half baths two stories It's really a family focused design If I can get the next slide
I'll move to the next slide. They may be a little hard to see on screen, but they're also in our council packets as well Why is it not moving? There we
go, there we go. All right so the emphasis on this concept is the private yards off the adjacent living space and then also the off-street parking with a family thinking about one covered space in the garage and then one in the driveway parking apron. Go onto the next slide please. So again, living downstairs powder rooms. And again please keep in mind this is conceptual design at this point even though you're seeing Harding computer graphics this is still up in the air and through design review process that we'll be going through as partners with the city and with Habitat.
And then on to the next slide we'll take a look at our other concept So this concept is a little bit different. It proposes four duplex tiny home units and total eight homes, eight tiny homes on the site. It's a combination of a one-bedroom single level unit in conjunction with a loft unit While it doesn't provide any parking on site, it does provide bicycle parking. Locked bicycle parking at this point and really capitalizes on the location of the site something that we can't change. It's walkable to downtown to jobs shopping parks and so you take the next slide The site plan really focuses on building a community around the units and creating that sense of community and connected open space.
And next slide, there you can see the one bedroom unit to the left and then the unit with the sleeping loft to the right. Like Darcy said we're happy to answer any questions and Really excited to be able to provide some much-needed affordable housing for the community. Thank you
Thank You Lauren much appreciated any questions from
Council I'm interested in the difference between Townhome proposal versus the eight duplex proposal in terms of what the purchase price would be? What kind of a down payment and what kind of financing in monthly payments just so we could get our arms wrapped around the idea of what affordability means and what the difference is between the two? Yeah,
that's great question. So 99.9% of all of our clients that have Purchased a habitat home Have had their down payment supplied by the state. So it's not an out-of-pocket cost to homeowners that buy a habitat home I heard some comments today about deed restrictions and some other things like that we have covenants that are designed to allow for that kind of agreement with the homeowner and us, the seller. But also the City of Ojai has the ability to be a part of that process as well regarding the length or time that these houses remain affordable also provides funding that comes from the state as part of that down payment process so Like I said, 99% of our clients don't have to come up with that down payment money themselves. The monthly payment though is determined by how much that homeowner adds to that down payment assistance program.
So if say the state comes up with $20,000 down payment, homeowner can put another 20,000 now they have $40,000 down payment which obviously impacts their monthly Mortgage payment, so there are some some calculations there Related to what the the cost? To purchase is going to be we think we can build these somewhere around sixty seventy eighty thousand dollars per unit These are self-contained units They come with washers and dryers, solar is part of the build process as well. I know the mayor when we came before you, I want to say was it a year ago James?
Yeah it's been awhile. You requested us to look at the possibilities of being completely electric Which we have looked at as well as part of the discussion we're having with the architectural design firm, which I think will also help. There is some debate on whether gas and certain elements of construction can be more efficient but electrical houses are something that we've also considered as part of this process so which also would impact the cost Obviously, we're in the concept process now.
Many of you know that the cost to build continues to rise. Lumber costs are going up. There's a number of things that impact where we are today versus where we may be in a year could be different. I told James that one of the things we don't like to commit to is telling you a price today and then having to deal with that price You know, a year from now it's going to be completely different. I can commit to this that our sweet spot for the units we're going to build and we built across the county are usually in the 40 AMI so we're not selling to families that are affordable which you're absolutely right there's affordable, there's low, there's low income. There's a whole spectrum that's part of that process What Habitat looks to do is to fill the void that's somewhere between 40 AMI, which is an average income of a household somewhere between $40,000, $50,000 or $60,000 combined income.
So we're really at the bottom part of the spectrum related The people that we sell to. We also have special programs that we've talked to James about that are for veterans and for the elderly, that would be or could be a part of this process as well. Lastly I would say this to you Council is that our goal is to provide housing for Ojai residents who either work or live in the city That's the design of how we've come up with this concept. We're hoping to be able to find eight tenants.
I can say that we just finished a five-unit project in Port Hueneme, I had over 1,000 applicants for five units so I'm pretty sure if you choose the tiny home project, we can find eight clients to purchase the houses here and Ojai. So it's really, it's a complicated question you ask. And I think once we get further along in the design process where we can get a clearer understanding of what the per square footage cost is going to be depending on which you choose, we'll be in a better position to answer that question.
Darcy, just roughly on that point though I believe you said that the so you gave an estimate for the tiny homes but the townhome I think you had estimated was about $500,000 per unit when we talked.
Yeah yeah roughly yeah roughly five hundred thousand per per unit to build each of those though keep in mind we do not sell them for five hundred thousand dollars Right, they cost us to build that but there's a gap in what the cost is versus what we actually sell to our clients.
And just to be clear you're selling them for a little less than that?
I'll give an example we did We did eight units in Oxnard. It cost us $400,000 plus to build those units sold for $170,000 and then $220,000 I think We just did what we call beachfront property in Port Wayne. The property value, it cost us almost $700,000 to build each unit. We ended up selling those for 340. So, we make up the difference. That's why Habitat is such a great program.
We make up the difference through a number of different funding programs that we've developed over the years.
1:58 – 2:0717 turns
Thank you. I have a couple of questions one is How are they is the property managed once they're built? Is there an HOA and And then the other question is what would the ownership structure be of the development
Yeah, so again habitat signs covenants with all of our homeowners for the terms of the mortgages. So typically, it's a two-part process. The city in some cases also has our tenants sign agreements. For example, Port Waimea had our tenant signed a 40 year agreement Deed agreement and Habitat did a think 30-year agreement Which is really designed to control the property and make sure the property is maintained, but in that agreement there are Restrictions regarding how that tenant can maintain or deal with that property for example all of our deeds require that homeowners cannot turn a garage into a room and Certain colors and paint schemes have to be maintained. Landscaping has to be maintained. Property quality has to be maintained as well.
There are parking issues that are tied to those deeds, and we check in all the houses we've built. We check those houses I drive around the county have conversations with our homeowners, making sure that they maintain that. Because one of the things that is part of this process is we want the houses we build to maintain their property value not only their property value but the property value in the surrounding area because eventually in 20 years or 30 years whatever the agreements may be they're going to want to sell those homes at market value and as long as they maintain those properties at that level they'll be able to reap the benefits Maintaining those properties in that in that manner and that's part of the covenant that we have when we qualify our buyers It's a long drawn-out process And how we select our homeowners?
That gives us the ability to control that process in a strict way
Can you clarify something you just said are you saying that in 20 years they can sell the house at market value and
Yeah, so for example the City of Port Wayne has a 40-year agreement with the homeowners and after 40 years if they maintain that property, they take care of it, they pay their mortgages, they do all the things are supposed to do. That deed restriction goes away and at that point they can then sell that house or that property at market value sure
Well, that's what's happening right now with the Cabrillo project on North Fulton I believe because the time has run out.
Just we can't talk about Right,
so the
city has
the ability to go above that minimum and I have sort of warned Darcy that I thought we would go above that minimum. Yeah
Yeah, and so so I think that that is something we would do. It's something once we approve a concept if we approve a concept tonight and we pick a concept then Darcy and I have to get to work sort of drafting the agreements you know I finalizing what the what those covenants are and I think for us, when I had sort of warned Darcy, I think I said I thought everybody would want at least 55 years which is... Which
we've done too. We've had 50 years.
And just to note because the city owns the land the council could set 55 years perpetuity whatever would make sense that the council would want that still makes the project work So it's the council's land, so the council controls those choices. And we would recommend if there is support to move forward as I think there may be then looking at those options could be something that the council can give direction on.
Thank you. Rachel, actually let's go ahead. Go ahead. You had questions.
It was it was just on the on the heels of that is is the the I mean, it's my understanding that your organization helps to offer a path to building generational wealth to, you know, to helping families have property they can pass down. And so would the Fort is the 40 years a part of that overall mission and that overall goal?
Yeah, so the goal is we have multiple studies that tell us that people that are low-income, that own property, their kids are healthier. They do better in school. Financially they're more secure and there are opportunities not only from a health standpoint but also from a financial standpoint. I will say this, that Habitat homes you cannot do a second on a piece of property that we've built or own. We don't let people who...we don't want people paying mortgages that are higher than 30% of their income whatever that may calculate to be and so we want to control that by not allowing them to get a second or third on a piece of property Also another way for them to become disciplined in how they manage their finances.
And also, too, the application process really kind of weeds out for us those individuals that have a history of not paying or those kinds of things. And everybody that buys a Habitat home it's the first home they've ever owned. We do not sell houses to people that it's their second home or third home. It's the first home that they've purchased. So there are a number of things are part of that process that sets them on that path to financial wealth and financial freedom. I will say this, that the 50-year restriction that we do do in some of our builds does have an impact on the type of applicants you get because it extends the period of time because one of the things that is very important for you to understand is that say in year 10 a family, say they outgrow a house and they want to move, right?
The covenants don't allow for us to take that house and sell it at affordable or sell it at market value. We have to sell it again at low income to another low-income family that may qualify. The family that's in that house when they leave that property, they get to collect all their mortgage payments that they've made, so it's really a forced savings account if they leave before the 50 years or the 40 years. And they get the difference between the AMI that is at the time they sell versus the time they purchase which is sometimes it can be as high as what $20,000 or $30,000.
It's not a lot of money but it's some revenue. So that also gives them the ability to know That if they want to make that transition during that 50-year period, they're not walking away without having an additional income that can help them to maybe make that next step in that journey for homeownership. So there's a lot of little things like that that are part of the Habitat model that I think sets us apart from a lot of other low-income builders And for the public's sake, we do not build rentals.
We only build houses that are for sale. So that's kind of how the program is designed.
Wonderful any other questions? Councilmember rule.
Yeah, so I think that council member Lang brought up a good point about the energy building intergenerational wealth and that's what happens when people own their homes And so but but to your point you actually can build I mean you're basically have your building intergenerational wealth whether or not you stay because all of the All of the mortgage payments and that differential between the AMI actually become, goes to them. Correct? So I think the council we should also sort of weigh you know the idea around the building of intergenerational wealth as letting people sell it after a certain amount they have then built intergenerational wealth that is more than they would get if they just pretty much collected their mortgage payments. Which is really important because that is the foundation right now of the middle class, is having your own home and being able for it to be yours as an asset.
2:07 – 2:157 turns
I totally agree. And it goes to James' point because the next family that buys that house, that 50-year starts all over.
And then I just another question yeah, we're still on questions. Okay? Yeah, just one other question um I'm not sure but I have asked and I think that the council has voted to Get some more information on SB 649 which is the tenant preference To for to prevent displacement that is the way that the city is able to give to basically allow residents of a town to be prioritized for these units if they are at risk of displacement.
So, you know I would like to reiterate that that would be a really good thing to know. I don't know if it's applicable here because it's a different model than building affordable housing that you rent but it may be. I don't know the law So if we could also just get some more information on that and find out the scope of it. Because no matter what we build, if we can give residents of Ojai who are at risk first priority, we have done the good that Council Member Whitman has spoken of.
Yeah, we can provide some more information. I'm not sure off the top of my head if how that bill regarding rental preference meshes with the Habitat model but we'll figure that out and get back to Council in writing. The other thing I will note as discussed in staff report is there is a system by which if the city puts something into the project then there's an ability for the Habitat standard preference for the county to be narrowed to just the city so we'll bring back more information on that one as well.
Thank you, that would be great.
To that point, how does the application process work?
Yeah. So I want to address the HOA question. I don't think I didn't answer that question. HOAs in the state of California—I heard somebody talking about the Real Estate Association earlier today—I sued them I sued them based on the fact that the HOA fees are tabulated through a calculation, right? You send all this information and it spits out a number. And our Port Wayne A&B families, we built the units. They qualified for a mortgage. Some of them had mortgages that were $1,100. Some of them had mortgages that were like $900 and whatever they wore. And then unbeknownst to us, we weren't aware at the time that if you build four or more units that are connected, you have to have an HOA.
Who knew, right? And so we sent these calculations into the real estate and CC&Rs and they came back. And they had an additional $320 a month. And I fell out of my chair, right. I was like oh my God what am I going to do how am I going to tell these families that now they've got this mortgage and now we gotta charge them another $320 on top of that. And so we sued the state. We had our law firm sue the state and we got an exception, thank God.
But HOAs are based on the number of units that are connected. That's why we submitted to you a design that has separation between the units, so that there's not an HOA fee. And as you can kind of see as we get further along the way, we don't have a swimming pool, we don't have any of those things. It's desert designed, water sensitive, so there's not the landscaping HOA fees that would be calculated.
So that's why the HOA question and the selection process. I brought our kind of overview for you to have, but one we use, the number one thing is need. We don't want to sell a unit to somebody that's not in need. That's the number one criteria. Number two, their ability to pay a mortgage. They have to have skin in the game outside of everybody that has a habitat home they spend 500 sweat equity hours themselves building their own home That's physical sweat equity versus what we want them to do, is have the ability to pay. And that's why we have an application process that does background checks. We visit the home that they're currently living in.
Most of our clients are responsible citizens. They have jobs. You know, they're paying for wherever they're living at this current time. And so we want to make sure that they can pay whatever that mortgage is going to be. And then third a willingness to partner with us and the city that they're going to be living in. Those are really the three basic criterias and then the application process Does looks at their backgrounds, looks at their bank accounts. Have they been paying their taxes?
Are they citizens? A number of things are part of that background check so that we know the type of clients we're putting into a community. It's important for us to be able to have some understanding as to who we're selling our homes to because that's a part of the process and then there's a year or in this case if you choose What we hope will be the tiny home project.
There'll be an eight-month build time where they'll be on site, they have to maintain their credit score through that process and that also helps them and helps us to gauge what kind of client they're going to be. Not everybody makes it to the end You know, in this particular process the application will choose 10 because we know that there's always a possibility that one or two families won't make it to the end of the journey.
And we want to make sure we have an alternate that can step in and play that role. So it's a pretty involved application, a lot of background work. We have a selection committee at Habitat who does an evaluation of all the applications. It's a first-come first-served basis because based on the fact that we take county money, city money, we can't discriminate. I want to make sure everybody understands that the term family is very wide.
Very wide, very wide. Yeah it's very wide. It doesn't we don't determine what that is and the city doesn't have a right to determine what that is either. It could be you know we've sold houses to a single mom with two adult children I mean we've sold houses Lot of different types of people So that's you know, something that the city doesn't have I heard some discussion about families and those kind of things. You know That's just not something we we get involved in and then it's a first-come first-served basis We do were required to advertise both in English Spanish and Mandarin across the city first And then it's First come first serve we We let everybody know when the day is, when we're going to be accepting applications. And we can do it here in Ojai.
We can do it at a Habitat location. We can do is on the build site. We could do it anywhere. But it's the first come and we take the first... In this case hopefully the tiny home project. The first eight or ten applicants that are complete And have all the qualifications that are right. And then, the process begins for them to become a part of that deal. That's really how it works.
Thank you. Thank you Darcy. Thank you Lauren. Really appreciate you being here. Can we move on to public comment now? Yeah. Okay thank you. First we have Bill Miley. Then we have John Trent and then Larry Steingold.
2:16 – 2:2216 turns
He's not reading, is he?
No.
Good evening Bill Miley. Mayor John Johnson and I spent about three years trying to develop an affordable housing program on this small city-owned parcel Even with the city owning a lot, we could not pro forma the building cost plus management and reserve costs with the rental income to make it work. So Habitat for Humanity became the possible option for this city-owned property which has in a deed that the city got when he bought it an affordable deeded requirement. That's what it has to be used The objective, as I understand it from the outcome four years ago is to provide housing for families. And then I just added with more than two persons because the tiny units are one bedroom.
Four of them, and the other four are lofts. And you ever sleep in a loft with somebody downstairs playing the radio? Okay. So I am fully supportive of the two-bedroom townhouses because in my understanding they meet the mission which was to offer housing for families with children Regarding financial support with funds from the Housing Trust Fund, which is part of the proposal here.
I question how much? We are supplying, in my opinion, a pricey piece of property as an incentive. The Housing Trust Fund use, as I expect it should be, used for assistance in a rental assistance program provided by Help of Ojai for homeless prevention and management. It's in the housing element. I don't think we've been doing that. I do support providing relief in the planning and building fee charges which are required for this project.
In summary, the townhouse design fits the intention of the project for affordable homes for families with two or more. I suggest relief of planning and building fees be the financial contribution of the city.
Thank you, Bill. Hang on, Bill. I will just want to add, if I may, Nick Oatway we need to acknowledge also spent about three years on this project with you architect Nick Oatway. That's
true. Also,
I was involved. You met at my house. I remember the whole thing.
The city and the council had a contract with Nick Oatway architect to design a five unit which I referred to.
Next we have Thank You bill next John Trent then Larry Steingold
So good evening mayor council members and city staff So I'm coming to you as a resident of 409 Franklin. So I live on the street I live on Franklin one thing that I have not heard which I'm kind of disappointed is the neighborhood nobody's talked about the neighbors and the community where these houses are going to be built and We've talked a lot about workshops and all these workshops that we want to do as a community to make sure that things are fitting in right.
This has been going on for four years in our little neighborhood, and we've had zero workshops. We got notice of this thing fairly short I sent letters out told my neighbors just to let them know hey FYI this is happening people were shocked they didn't know what was going on so You know, we need some heads up. And I understand you guys are going to make some sort of decision tonight which I hope you don't but it sounds like you might so I want to point out a couple things So first thing to address. I don't know if you got my Mailer that I said read
your
letter
Yeah,
we have a safety issue on Franklin Franklin was never designed to be a street It's an actual driveway That's what initially it was built for so it's not a street this intersection on Franklin and Montgomery is dangerous You can't see to the left when you turn out, you can't see to the right. You put more people on there that's just going to be an accident waiting to happen So I strongly advise that whatever plan we go with has parking on site because there is very, there's no parking on Franklin number one. So you know if you have tiny homes there people are going to want to park somewhere and you can't park there so then they're gonna try to park on North Montgomery that's already full too. I don't know if you guys have been down Montgomery but it's packed especially on weekends So there's very little parking along that area.
So anything that you guys decide, please include parking. Parking is a big issue. So I want to address that. Number two, I just wanted to make note that this lot is tiny and actually it doesn't really qualify for SPL overlay so we need to consider that. I know we put it as part of our SPL but Technically it's not it can't be part of the SPL because it's just too small Another thing to just note that yeah, we have an issue for affordable affordable homes in Ojai But it should not come at the sacrifice of safety. So we need to be real cognizant of the safety issue We need to make sure we're addressing the neighbors in the town and the area to make sure that everybody's safe and that we have proper streets to build this kind of density.
That's it, look I gave you about 20 minutes, 20 seconds. Thank
you John.
May I comment too John? John your letter really expanded my thinking but we're not in the discussion phase yet so I was gonna address all the things you're concerned about thank you. Okay perfect thank you.
Next we have Larry Steingall.
2:22 – 2:2912 turns
Great project. The fact that they can buy is a wonderful thing so that people have skin in the game. My concern is not so much the project per se, though we do need off-street parking there because it's just doubling up. They want us to donate the property. How much is the property worth? Is it worth $50,000 or is it a million dollars? don't know that it can affect the deal.
They want us to agree to pay pre-construction costs, unknown. The fact that somebody mentioned 350 already puts a target on that because if you say we have 350, that's what they're going to look to grab no offense okay? The fact that we may pay down the deposit if with the city could make some money back on the deposit like a long term note it's also skin in the game not a lot but something It shows particular concern But the idea of buying a tiny home and us helping funder help putting it together is a good thing Mr. Miley's way of suggesting that we swallow the fees as part of our contribution is a good thing Because we can end the costs. We didn't mean there's a lot of things that we can do here. This is a good project Okay, the density is important.
The neighbors are important I am an NIMBY Okay, not in my backyard. Okay? They have single family homes There are two-story homes all or not two story homes their apartments all over the place that are to story fine But put off street parking there's no reason why the tiny units can't have parking instead of having eight half six There's always room for some parking because we can't deal with it. It's just a problem but it's a good project
Thank You Larry any comments online Weston
Yes Mayor, we have two raised hands. First we'll have Becky followed by Lyron. Becky you have the floor? Go ahead Becky.
Can you hear me question?
Yes please proceed.
Good, thank you. I'm sorry. Okay, I'm just wondering if the presenters might be able to address why these homes are not required to go into and stay in a truly affordable housing pool for locals in perpetuity when the original owners move out or die? We need an ongoing source of truly affordable housing in Ojai going forward into the future and not more market rate housing.
It's great to give low income people a leg up to home ownership, and I'm very much in favor of that but we also need to consider the future needs of our locals who may or may not be able to afford market rate housing in the future What's to prevent the owners from selling to out of towners who have more money than local citizens and who can outbid local buyers in the future, thus increasing our population here in Ojai and also increasing the housing unaffordability for our locals.
Thank you.
Thank you, Becky. Lauren and Darcy do you want to address that question? Okay That's legit
You don't have to I thought we explained the 50-year process The house would remain affordable for whatever term the city but it's a legitimate question that goes to some of the discussion you guys have been having tonight, that we need to build more affordable housing. And I would say we need to build more low-income housing which is different than affordable.
So I think that's really the bigger issue how cities build more low income housing to address the issues that she brings up because you don't want to eventually over time a house wears down Houses get old, like we get old. Like our bodies break down. You know eventually a house turns out where it's no longer the same property that you bought when it was brand new.
It needs repairs. It needs to be upgraded. It needs to have new amenities put into it and that's... A homeowner who buys a low-income home cannot be expected to maintain that property for 100 years It's just, it's unrealistic. So I think the 50-year window is really the way that we ensure that a city has a piece of property that will be low income and affordable for that length of term.
And I think the thing we would like to do is obviously build more low-income houses in Ojai so that 50-year process can be 50 years on Montgomery, 50 years over here and all over the city. But that's why the 50-year window is important and as I explained earlier is that when that house is sold that 50-year term starts all over again So a house in reality could be affordable for 70 years.
It could be affordable for 100 years, who knows? But there will have to be some upkeep that'll be a part of that process to maintain that property at a standard that code enforcement and planning would require.
I have a quick question. So you're able to direct these opportunities through the applicants at the beginning of the process so that we can do this for Ojai residents? When it comes time to sell Whether that's at the end of the term or if it's before the end of the term. Is there any mechanism by which we can direct that sale give up, you know priority to a
Ojai resident absolutely You can draft that into the language of the agreement that the city has with With the deed on. Yeah, absolutely Absolutely
Thank you. Thank you very much one more public comment.
That's right We have new to now we'll start with Lyron followed by Stephen Cola me Lyron you have the floor
2:29 – 2:3740 turns
Hi, I just wanted to make sure you received my written comments that I emailed earlier. I'm putting my child to bed right now so can't read the full statement. I too just like John have some concerns about the safety. I live right next door to that lot and also I've seen pictures of the lot that have been presented that make it look way bigger than it is and I really do not think it's a very big lot and it's not as big as you think it is. So thank you
Thank you, Lyron. Next we have Stephen Kolame. Stephen, you have the floor?
I have just a short comment. Ojai resident Justin Pennington and I had an opportunity to meet with Mr. Taylor, and I must say that the combination of the bootstrapping that Habitat for Humanity engages in, and the sweat equity is very impressive. They have a mature model for building housing and getting people into it who otherwise would not be able to afford a mortgage. This unfortunately is not a rental housing situation so it's not for the very low Extremely low. These are people who are going to have the ability to take on a mortgage and be able to develop some equity, and I think it's a very useful model. But thank you.
Thank you Steve. That's
all
Mayor. Okay. All right let's move on to...
I appreciate the fact that they can focus it on local residents. I think we should also consider local employees as the same as residents.
You said he did. Oh
okay, I just want to make sure... He said that
was part of the application process.
Okay so when we kept saying you know... People who live or work. Live or work. That's what I hope we've prioritized.
Okay, thank you. All right, let's move on to council discussion who would like to begin
so I have just a quick question because the There were a couple of people who commented on the parking in the Small house design the unit design. So maybe we could get The Habitat for Humanity folks back to talk about parking on the On the eight unit design?
Yeah, our emphasis was on providing more homes for people instead of places for cars. It's a sad commentary on my profession when we get handed a piece of property to study. The first thing we have to study is how many cars can you park on the parcel? And this is about affordable housing and trying to house as many people as we can on this property so It is something that we had studied and taken into consideration We also think the proximity of the site to the downtown is is excellent The walkability and the income level that this is restricted to is for those that are going to be working in this community These are people that have access to alternative means of transportation as well So that was really kind of the driving factor on.
So the eight percent, the eight unit design?
Currently provides bicycle parking locked storage for their bicycles out of the
weather. But it does not include any off street parking? That's correct
yeah currently in this concept it's not to say we couldn't change it but again the concept we presented
And it To follow up on that if you have eight units, you couldn't have any parking on that space. Is that Currently yes Okay
But you could you could potentially you you could reduce we could look at we could study trying to provide Parking but I think it'll be at the expense of providing an affordable home, right? Okay
I was gonna make that point is we had we had met a couple times and I think The reality is to add on-site parking We will lose units
Just want to confirm that okay
other comments from Council Sousa. Yeah, I want to talk about the parking and everything else First of all, I 100% support the project I'm not this I see pros and cons between the four units and eight units many pros and cons The conversation about parking as you probably know is taking place all over United States strong towns Manufacturers daily articles on the issue of parking. There's absolutely no reason why this couldn't be Ojai's first no-car project. I also propose that we look at the entire North Montgomery Corridor car sharing, people do need access to a car maybe this will motivate us to produce a car sharing program and there's going to be plenty of people applying that understand That for this to be affordable, they can't you know and if we do arrive at a compromise and have parking certainly no more than one car per unit or in there's I mean the those that are willing to not use up a parking spot could get You know There'll be a different price perhaps on their unit or something.
I mean like I think what I'm trying to say That I am willing to work out any work on any obstacles. They can all be resolved. Does this also have a question? I hope this isn't stupid, but this does go through the normal planning commission process
correct
into our
That's the point I wanted to make in the introduction. You know, it feels like a weird situation but it's because essentially the city is the property owner this is us deciding what we want to do with our property and then we have to go through the process so that's where we're at today. In
one critical difference given that the city is the property owner and thus controlled by the City Council the Planning Commission This process will be a recommendation to the council who will make the final decision on design because it is the city's own land. Thus, the elected council will control.
And so can I just clarify for the public so that when if we approve a project it will go in front of the planning commission and that would give the public ample opportunity to participate?
Yeah, we're not approving a project tonight. We're deciding whether to proceed with the proposal.
If we agree to proceed then there'll be plenty of time for the community to weigh in.
What we would expect is likely a couple more opportunities, because this would be if it goes forward tonight. It's sort of four, eight or some other unit count go forth and sort out design and cost issues. Likely come back to the City Council for a cost discussion then to Planning Commission for a design discussion then back to City Council for the final approval.
So there are lots of opportunities for people to weigh in. Can
I have a clarification? Do you want us to decide amongst ourselves the number of units tonight?
Yes, yes and I think we sort of tried a year ago and we narrowed it down to two but we're at the point where we need to narrow it down to one before... You know the comment about not knowing the cost and not knowing everything is because we still haven't chosen which one so we need to choose which one
So it seems like the neighbors are more in favor of the four units primarily because of the concern about traffic. To me, the advantage of the four units is that's truly family housing. The advantage of the other is that we also need that type of housing and that could be more easily to be car-free housing just because of the nature perhaps of the people that live there.
So I'm just gonna wait and see what my colleagues think. And
we'll go from
there, yeah. Can I ask
one
more
question? So is it either or or can be a mix?
2:37 – 2:5030 turns
So we had other proposals and then from those we came back with these so I think we're at the point where we need to make a decision.
Alright James, I gotcha. Okay Rachel.
I was going to ask a similar question you know if we could meet in the middle My initial, first of all I love the organization. I especially am in big favor of any development that offers a path to home ownership. So important and for so many reasons. And I'm really excited about this project. So my first impression was, let's build as many as we can. The tiny houses was something that was really interesting to me especially considering that you're thinking about elderly And, you know, tenants and also veterans.
And I like the design. It looks good. You know? This doesn't look like apartments or it doesn't look out of place. It actually really fits. Within the overall feel of that area I Want to and and I John I received your I read your email thoroughly today And I really appreciate you gathering feedback and thoughts from other residents. And one thing I will say is that there is a we have a parking committee and We are looking at all aspects of parking within this city And I think that if we do decide to go with the eight unit proposal or the eight unit design, perhaps we could factor that into our conversation about parking in this city.
For the people on Montgomery, for the people who live right there downtown, I think there could be solutions to the parking issue if we decide to go with more housing. I also agree with Sousa that more and more, we're gonna be looking at ride sharing our thoughts about transportation and how we consume energy is all gonna be changing over the next several years. And when we have the ATP project it's gonna be a very walkable and bike-able community. So I think I think there could be some really good workable solutions to some of the concerns that the neighbors might have. And we don't have those solutions right now at this moment, but I hear you and I want to find solutions.
I think there's an abandoned parking lot on that street. A huge one! Yeah, a church right across the street practically.
Other comments from council members?
I like the idea of being able to do this for more residents, and I know that the four-unit design contemplates 1,800 square feet per unit. And I think talking about that idea that we're are or should be transitioning to, you know new ways of living. I think that includes smaller living spaces and so I did see that the census for Ojai has the median household size as 2.4 people So I think it is appropriate for us to look at these sizes as accommodating a family.
So these smaller houses can accommodate a family, it may be different than what we're used to traditionally but that's part of our Challenge and I don't know if there's something that Habitat for Humanity can do Within these. I guess the loft is Part of that accommodation is that it may turns a one-bedroom into a two bedroom. I Think it's really important that Smaller homes are More energy efficient They're better for the environment, they have a lesser cost on the environment over time.
And so I have a pretty strong orientation towards the project with having more units but I also want to be able to accommodate outdoor living space which I think is important in Ojai allows somebody to live in a smaller space here and I also want to make sure that we address the housing issue, the parking issue. And it sounds like we're committed to doing that because It's not so much the idea that we can't do a project that tells the people who purchase, you're not gonna have a parking space except for some other. You have to figure out parking somewhere else.
That there is a legitimate concern by that neighborhood that if we don't have parking assigned, that they're gonna end up parking on Franklin And Franklin's apparently heavily impacted at least. You know, we maybe need to look into that a little bit more and how to address mitigating their concerns because I completely appreciate. They're not wanting to be over-impacted, but I think it's great that we're potentially going to be giving several families a path to home ownership and long term wealth.
Okay, Susan and then Leslie. Can we have signage on Franklin that parking for residents and guests only or something to that effect? Permit. Permit. Similar to what we have at the top of North Signal now?
Yeah.
And the lease open other places. Yeah
I think the city would have the ability to do that so it's something we can look at sort of those options of how to address impacts.
John,
yeah. There are no parking signs there, but people park there anyway.
But we could get
them. And nobody enforces it.
Yeah, but you know what? Those are things—obstacles we have to overcome.
We
can
get some. And the parking that you were talking about at the church? That's church-owned parking.
Yeah, but we know we haven't discussed with them. We don't we were before the next hearing. We're gonna look at all of that.
Yeah Yeah Yeah, they're
yeah My thinking about that there's other projects coming down the pike that will provide family housing so perhaps this the eighth I really like because it's so close to the street, and it looks so massive because it's close to the street. I'm inclined more and more inclined to look at the eight units to consider because just aesthetically Just has a whole different feeling yeah
Leslie I'm also inclined to go with the eight units. I think you know, I think we need to provide as quickly as we can as much housing as we can I Think that the parking Situation is solvable. I love the idea of a car share. I think it's it could be the place where we start that and And the idea of saying that you know we have built. It is a carless building and you know it is primed for that because of its location that having been said I'd like to reiterate Councilmember Lang's assurances And I think that's a really good point.
I absolutely agree about the need for family housing. I think we do have that coming down the pike. There are all many, many good reasons for having family housing kids in schools you know just as endless for the good reasons for it but I would love the idea given what we heard today for you know the first general comments around homelessness and at riskness that we would be able to provide eight units like You know and have that on the books. So for that reason I would be in support of the eight units, but you know, I'm also could be hearing other things too
well And I just want to say thank you John for showing up and representing the neighborhood and we definitely hear your concerns and we appreciate your letter and it was very thoughtful and And Thank you Rachel for bringing up the parking committee and that we that there are options that we could look at solutions clearly, we Need units and it sounds as if the council is likes the eight unit
I'm open to You know adjusting if it is needed for parking
well and just and just a reminder that this is just the first step to Set it forward to go to the Planning Commission. So Is there a
motion? I want to say I could almost think of eight families right now that want to live car-free they have We have such fabulous bikes now. I've watched a mother over the last eight years, how her children grew. First they rode on the back of the bike, two of them. Then they had training wheels and now those kids ride their bikes to school and they're like adults. They're still going to school because they were trained from infancy Thank you.
Thank you very much. There's all kinds of ways to make it work. Maybe we can put another pocket park in the neighborhood. Let's look at the whole environment that this housing is going into. I think this is very exciting and wonderful.
I might start a GoFundMe fund for the citizens of Ojai to put money in to buy eight electric bikes and gift them upon the opening of the units as a way to encourage and to show our love and appreciation for this project. Maybe we can get them donated? That would be even better!
It'll make national news, it'll be great!
Also, I just want to reiterate councilmember Whitman's point you know 1,800 square feet is a pretty large house
It's bigger than my house they're not 1800 square feet. I think the design is 14 for Yeah, yeah, it's still a big house Well is there
2:50 – 3:0012 turns
I'll
make a motion to move forward, to direct staff to move forward with the
eight unit tiny house design.
Can
we offer a friendly amendment about the parking to Ask the Parking Committee to
yes, and and to ask the Parking Committee which we're meeting next week. Ask the Parking Committee to consider Parking options for this development.
Okay, great a roll call please Weston.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
okay wonderful five zero and thank you so much Darcy and Lauren for being here.
Thank you it was very nice to meet you for the
first
time
we're really excited to collaborate with you thank you yeah well let's take a short break and we will be back with item number three Andy, will you come back please?
3:01 – 3:096 turns
Is that a function of it during the intermission?
OK, all right. We are back. We'll start with the public hearing now. It's item number three revisions to the formula business ordinance regarding revisions to the definitions and criteria applied to evaluate a new business. James, you have staff report
Yes, thank you. And we did get the thumbs up from our IT so I think we're...
Yes, we're broadcasting correctly.
Yeah. So let me pull up one slide on this one So we just have one slide to sort of try to summarize the lengthy history regarding formula business ordinance in Ojai. I think it's one of those things that were sort of known for but there's a, I think what we've kind of learned is there was a lot of different Maybe ideas of how it worked or a different understanding of it. So we tried to bring back some revisions that I think help align it with what people have understood it to be and to be effective moving forward. But in a nutshell, the Formula Business Ordinance originally was passed in 2007.
The purpose of the ordinance was stated as to help maintain the small-town character of Ojai and the quality of life of Ojai. This is commonly referred to as the chain store ordinance or the chain store ban. And essentially, the ordinance in 2007 allowed a business to open in Ojai as long as they had 11 or fewer locations. And I think what I've found is most people's eyes get big when I say that because my belief is that, when I moved to town, I was told we only allow three locations. And it's sort of like, I think that's like what everybody thought the rule was but it wasn't the rule from 2007.
Most of our businesses, I think maybe why people believe that is because most of our businesses are fewer than three locations but that wasn't the rule And so in 2007, that was passed. We allowed a business to open with up to 11 locations and there's some criteria that establishes whether it's part of a chain or not and those six criteria are standardized merchandise facade, standardized facades, standardized decors or colors, And that's essentially a complicated way to say, you know, if business opens and it's called Subway.
It's got two of the criteria to be considered a part of the subway chain. And so that was the ordinance that initially was put into place, it stopped larger chains from coming into Ojai. In 2021 there were a couple of things that happened and a couple of rumors of things that might happen that caused concern and caused everybody to look at the ordinance and realize The number of businesses allowed that we had all understood to be three or five or seven were sort of the numbers that we heard from people across the board, that those weren't correct. That it was 11. So in 2021, we brought an urgency ordinance and a moratorium forward that essentially...
It was an urgency ordinance to limit the number of locations allowed to five. And it also added a definition for website and collective marketing that added that as one of the, not criteria but it added at that as a consideration of if a business has four locations and a website should that be considered the fifth business that would cause it to not be allowed in Ojai. So in the urgency ordinance that was set up since that urgency ordinance was put into place over the last two years.
We have had a few workshops, we've had a few planning commission discussions. To ask everybody and to ask the community and to ask other businesses. What do you think is appropriate as the ordinance moving forward? The feedback that we got, of course there were varying opinions but the general feedback that were part of those conversations felt like five is the right number. Allowing a business that has five locations to come to Ojai still helps maintain that small town character, still helps every business feel like it's unique to Ojai.
And so we got that feedback. There was also a recommendation to add a seventh criteria, which is the standardized menu of food and drinks that could also be considered as one of the triggers for whether a business is part of a chain or not. And then the final feedback we got, which I would say this was maybe a little bit more split but there was a split on whether or not to count the website and the collective marketing as a location. Ultimately what we heard was a majority saying that shouldn't be counted and I think I agree with that because the reality is almost every business now is gonna have a website. And so I don't necessarily see that that should be considered a standalone location So, we have the proposed ordinance which would limit it to five locations.
So what that means just very simple if a business has four locations and moves to Ojai to add another location that would be allowed if they have six locations and they moved to Ojai and added a location which would be at seventh that would not be allowed they would have to follow, apply for a conditional use permit is technically what happens if somebody triggers the formula business ordinance and that's what's always been the case.
So it just changes that number that triggers it and so like I said ultimately there are a lot of opinions we thought that was the consensus. I think it's reasonable and we prepared an ordinance to implement that The urgency ordinance that we've adopted expires at the end of this month. This item being brought forward now, if it's adopted should sort of maintain that limit and then moving forward that would be the new rule within Ojai.
So council can adopt the ordinance. Council could choose not to adopt the ordinance, in which case the original ordinance would still apply. Or council could say there's a different number that works and come back with the ordinance or modify the ordinance so those are the options and we're happy to answer any questions.
Thank you James. Any questions from council? Andy?
3:09 – 3:1511 turns
Microphone
please
I'm first going to add a little bit to what James said about the origins of this ordinance Because I think I was around listening to the debate and one of the things that was promoted or a concern was chains that had predatory business practices where they could come into a community and cut prices, run that as long as it took to drive out local businesses and kind of take over. And so I just remember that being a big part of the rationale or at least the debate when it was adopted and so my biggest question is what happens when we have a business That's here in place successful and they have fewer than five branches maybe scattered around the county.
And if but if they have the opportunity to open number six somewhere else does that impact them here in town at all?
No, as long as they don't seek to modify their existing permits. This is triggered when a business comes to the city to seek a permit to operate or to expand so if they have four here and they open three more somewhere else, they're not coming in for permits for the location here. But if they wanted, they have four here, they open three more somewhere else, they're okay, then they wanna open another one here, five here and they already have three elsewhere, then that fifth one would have to come into the process. So anything that exists doesn't get when it crosses over the threshold based on other locations, it doesn't invalidate their permits here.
So they're allowed to grow just not in OI.
Just one other question if I understand correctly the fact that you have multiple locations doesn't necessarily put you into this statute. You have to this ordinance you have to meet these criteria and who makes the decision on whether they fit the criteria and How objective or subjective is that?
So the criteria, the decision is made by the Planning Commission on a conditional use permit application. Staff would receive an application assess it against the standard and if it seems to fit within the standards requiring a conditional use permit then they would tell the applicant apply for it and then come to the planning commission And the standard, it's not just number absolutely. It's the standardized common uniform features and is proposed it has to have two standardized features among the five or more establishments that are two out of the six listed feature types.
Yeah
so if you have Six businesses each one of which is completely different in look and the only thing they share is a standardized trademark but they don't share standardized merchandise or facade or decor or apparel or signage. The only thing they have as a common trademark that wouldn't be triggered because it doesn't have two of the six standardized features
So when I thought about this issue, our local breweries immediately came to mind. And so I was curious whether... So each of the breweries here that are local breweries they have a trademark and they do sell merchandise That includes that trademark, but for the most part. They're selling beer. And so does that meet the formula business criteria by the fact that they have both a trademark and sell merchandise?
I think so, I think that's a good example actually of for both of your questions because I think one of our breweries has five locations and so their current location would be fine No issue because it's already in Ojai and that but then if they came in and said we want to open a second location at Ojai which would be location six, they would have at least two of the criteria. I think probably more three four five six criteria and potentially one of them maybe finish the point there miss oh good
They would, so yes if a brewery came in and it met standardized menu, their standard layout of beer, standardized signage most of them also have standardized apparel and a trademark they meet it. If they have four plus the one in town that's five, five is okay. If they come in to open a second one in town, their sixth total that's more than five. That would trigger the ordinance but the key here is the ordinance isn't a ban outright it then triggers into the criteria for that additional conditional use permit and they'd have to then go through the process and we're not judging an application that hasn't yet been filed but that's what would happen. They'd go through the process but there's nothing that would invalidate the existing location in Ojai anything that exists would be protected.
3:15 – 3:2225 turns
Any other questions?
I watched the Planning Commission hearings and how they struggled with this, and I applaud them for coming this far. I also want to thank Lenny Klaif and Ken Lee and Leslie Neufeldt and myself for the original chain store ordinance. We tried. But there's I feel there must be some confusion because we got a public comment from Jack Dyer owner of the Topa Brewery, right? And he says Jack also, he thinks if they open one or two more locations elsewhere I assume they would be forced to close the Ojai location of Topatopa
Brewery.
That's
incorrect. Yeah that's
what they're saying is that it doesn't affect an existing permitted business it's a brand new one
I just want to be sure. There is a legitimate concern, it's just not that one. The legitimate concern is that if they wanted to open another Ojai location, it would be more difficult to do that. But I think that's also sort of the point of the ordinance so it's weighing those, balancing those interests.
The other thing I want to be clear on is that we're talking about ownership, not brand because for example Starbucks could not come in with an Ojai coffee shop.
No the focus is on the standardized features it's not about who owns the company
okay
It's about whether they have two or more of the six standardized features. Okay. Standardized merchandise or menu, standardized facade, standardized decor colors, standard uniform apparel, standard signage and trademark.
Yeah.
So if Starbucks or some other large company created a separate company with a whole different trademark, Ojai Coffee and opened up a little Ojai coffee joint That had no common signage, no common merchandise. All Ojai coffee, a separate trademark. They would be able to do that under the current ordinance or the ordinances proposed. It's not about ownership it's about the look, the feel, the menu, the merchandise etc.
The reality is most national companies will not do that because the market is too small The focus here I think isn't national. This largely blocks national chains, although subject again blocks means they have to do the additional permit process. I think the concern at the Planning Commission was largely much smaller entities but to be clear something like Starbucks could do that if they jump through each of those hoops
Yeah, yeah I'm aware of those criteria. If
i could real quick on that point sorry to I know you're trying to get to your next point but we actually have had that happen and I just think that's maybe kind of interesting but we've had a couple businesses come in over the last few years and one of them came in Sort of went through that exercise. It was a well-known chain brand and they said, well what if we changed just our facade? And the facade looked different. Well you're still triggering five other criteria. Well what if we changed our merchandise? What if we trained changed our decor? And by the end then they stopped and they went, well then why would we even do this?
And then they said your ordinance doesn't make sense and I said no it does. It just doesn't help your business, you know So we've had that happen and and you know Potentially if somebody did come in and go I own this huge company and I want to start a brand new business That's only in Ojai and that has nothing in common with my other businesses They'd be able to do that But that's also it there's not really I don't really say a way to write it to stop that from
the reality is we can't prohibit Individuals or companies with significant resources from coming into town. That's just the nature of capitalism in the system in which we exist We can do a lot to limit the impact of it, but we can straight prohibit that
yeah
It's just a recognition of reality
Okay, I feel really good about this now that you've clarified that the Topatopa Brewery there was a misunderstanding. Yeah
and we can try to coordinate and I think Jamie Fleming's here with the chamber and we'll try to make sure that through one of us that we let him know that that's not the case.
We'll move on to public comment now so we'll open the public hearing and we'l start with Jeffrey Starkweather then Bianca Rowe and then Warner Ebbing
As a planning commissioner, of course I voted for this and the first thing I want to mention is that My very first meeting on the Planning Commission We had to deal with this and it was overwhelming because we had three new planning commissioners And there'd been all this information and I was really Irritated at the town and the planning guy that I'm being hit with having to make a decision without any information but since then Our planning department, Lucas Siebert has done an incredible job working with the business community.
That forum we had I thought he did an incredible job of moderating it and when it came back to us we had plenty of information. We had good input from businesses so I feel real positive about that. I do want to emphasize, because this came up and you don't normally think about this. But the idea was what happens if there's a type of business we don't have? But the only way we could get it is some kind of slightly bigger chain, 8 or
10.
So we do have a provision here which is the conditional use permit. And I think that the chamber should know that and the public should know And it's got pretty good criteria. You know, and it's somewhat subjective but you know they won't result in an over concentration of formative business types contribute to the balance of small size business so we can if we had something You know, we could accommodate it.
But it would have to be a conditional use permit and so I think that's a good thing. And the other thing because it's something implied that there will be loopholes. We're going to have one of the stricter formative businesses codes in the state. Most of them have a much higher number, but we think that's great for Ojai. I mean one of the things it does for us actually I didn't think about this because we were talking about supply and demand and prices by limiting the demand we're actually keeping rental prices down for businesses in our downtown which is a good thing So I think this fits Ojai, it's a good thing we're doing and I hope you pass it as is. Thank you.
Thank You Jeffrey next we have Bianca Rowe then Warner Ebbink and then Barbara Bowman
3:22 – 3:287 turns
Good evening Late evening. My name is Bianca Rowe, I used to have the store on Main Street called In The Field and we are were at the front lines of the beginning of this ordinance being re-evaluated And the trigger for quite a few, specifically retailers in town was a bigger store coming into the city which became quite detrimental to most of our small businesses that were at risk of losing our Lines sorry I didn't know what I don't know how else to describe it to you, but as retailers where curators and so we curate specific lines and specific furniture, clothing which represents the story that we want to tell and it's unique to us.
As a small retailer we have very limited buying power and the beginning of what this was in place to protect Bigger stores coming in that have bigger buying power. And so we found that we were at risk of losing our designers because there are other stores that are able to, for example write an order for one season summer spring for $150,000 and that is because they have 10 possibly 11 stores and they are able to on one invoice Fulfill all of that. We however as smaller stores have far less buying power So as the designer they have to choose between the big or small and everybody needs to make a living so this was the beginning of the trigger of a lot of us coming together and I so commend the city for listening and working and learning a different language because originally this was based on restaurants and they really heard what was at stake and made all of those adjustments to accommodate different voices on Main Street.
And that's what we're here for, the beauty of the town is the fact that most of our business owners are there working living Meeting people every day, and it's not just outsourced so I have Just the utmost respect for everything that's been done. I would have liked to see three other people like to see seven But there is a beauty of meeting in the middle and getting the job done So thank you so much. I hope you support the ordinance and I'm really happy to have been a part of it
Thank you, Bianca. Thank you. Next we have Warner Ebbing and then Barbara Bowman.
Good evening, Mayor and Council and staff. I think it's a great ordinance the way it's written now. I think having the ability to have five and then your sixth one would then trigger not being able to come to Ojai, I think is great. I thing with buying power if you give like Bianca brought up If you use the breweries that are here that have five locations, yes they're going to have bigger buying power when they buy their hops to make their beer. That's just part of business. I think you can't fault somebody for being successful.
So I think if they fall in line with that, success is that. You get bigger buying power. More than one restaurant in town, you can buy lettuce. It could be two totally different restaurants but you're getting lettuce at a better price than the person with one restaurant. So I think five is a great number and I think you guys did a good job doing this and thank you for having all of those forums to hear our voices. Thank you.
Thank You Warner Barbara Bowman
It's been a long night for you guys, for us, for everybody. Listen, everybody has stated it. Lucas did run a really good public forum and I have to tell you 90% of the people that we talked to which was citizens and store owners, we really did a big survey would have been happy if we'd had three, but we came to the conclusion in order to protect the town and be reasonable that five. So if you have six it triggers it and it will keep the small town because 99% of this town are single Owners, I mean they're not multiple. They're not two, they're not even three.
So you're really protecting to not be Abbot Kenney or Santa Barbara or any of these places. So in perpetuity we will remain as the small mom and pop stores that we've always been and I think the ordinance was written up with that in mind. And I think it was really good what happened to trigger this whole thing. And they did a very good job of investigating them. We really did go through this a lot And I think it will protect the stores in the future, and it will keep the character of Ojai. And I hope you pass it just the way it is. They did a very good job. Thank you for tonight.
Thank you, Barbara. Any comments online?
Yes, Mayor. We have Jack Dyer has the only raised hand. Jack, you have the floor.
3:28 – 3:3612 turns
I'm unmuted now. Can you hear me now?
Yes, please go. We can hear you Jack just so you know because we spoke about this. I'm not sure if you were there. We did comment on the just clarifying that any business that already exists in Ojai would not be impacted by the change. So we just want to make sure you heard that.
Yeah, I heard that. That was great reading it was a little confusing for both us and our League of Council. First of all thank you guys for spending the time on this and I know it's been a long night so I won't take too much of your time but I think we still have a problem with the code as written and we were hoping Um, and I'm just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about.
got passed in January and modified what a type 23 small beer manufacturer is allowed to have, and they increased it to eight total locations. I understand the fact that you know we are not looking to open a second location within the confines of Ojai but where my concern lies is if we were to at some point have to apply for an additional permit or any permit for our existing location, I think about potential expansion into a neighboring business or something like that. That this ordinance thereby makes that process a whole lot more difficult and presents some risk for us. So that's really my main concern. My ask and my request would be to either write in a simple switch from five to eight or categorize the businesses You know, and have small beer manufacturers to have the ability to have the number allowed based on the state ABC regulations.
Currently small wineries are allowed two satellite tap rooms I could see them looking to increase that over the years with their state lobby so I think for certain unique business types like ours We shouldn't be treated like a McDonald's or something like that because we are, are so drastically different. So that that's my only concern I'm not sure if staff or legal wants to comment on that or we can take that conversation offline, that that's the main concern that we have is any potential for future permits, or if the city someday decides that they need to make us go through a conditional use permit for existing location. There's just so many times where a permit process can be triggered by something that's out of our control and that's what concerns me with this.
Not the spirit of the law. I really enjoy the spirit of law. It's one of the things that I love about Ojai and that's my main concern.
Thank you, Jack. Any comments?
Yeah I happen to comment briefly the council of course could direct eight they could direct a carve out for small alcohol companies we would await policy direction from the council on that i would note the ordinance as drafted in subsection e on page four Attachment A, page 4 of 6, which is also page 3-10, about two thirds of the way down. Subdivision E, existing formula retail establishments.
As proposed five locations is not a formula business establishment. If Mr. Dyer were to open another one somewhere else, to hit that trigger in the future any modification of the permits for their Ojai location will be subject to the non-conforming uses part of the codes which generally allows certain modifications subject to rules and requirements so that process exists and there wouldn't typically although I can't predict the future perfectly wouldn't be a need for a new conditional use permit because they're already have an existing open location The council could add some language that would further make it clear that if a business Exists in Ojai as Five or fewer and then there's later other locations are open outside the city That it wouldn't be subject to it for that Ojai location That already exists, but we could draft out of the council once but I think the existing language meets that need
Thank you Matt, is that it Weston? Okay. We will go ahead and close the public hearing and move on to council discussion
Who would like to begin can I go because I'm gonna follow up Can we write it so that I think Mr. Dyer was concerned that if he now comes in for a permit, he's potentially going to be in a much more complicated permit process. Can we write it in a way? I have no idea what it would say but you know write it in Formula business hurdle part of it, but they have to go through all of the normal Permit application requirements, but if they were existing Maybe at the time maybe on the date that we adopt this Any business currently existing is going to be exempted
Yeah, there's a way to do it I think toward that goal would be something like a Businesses that exist as of the date of the adoption of the ordinance that amends the relevant sections, if they later become formula businesses are exempt from the formal business requirements. So that protect something that, and we could limit it to only their current Ojai location as of lawfully extant meaning that it both exists and has permits as of the date of the ordinance adoption. So if Mr. Dyer later had some permit for his current location they would be protected but if he tried to open a sixth location in Ojai In Ojai, six total second in Ojai. That one would have to go through the process. We could draft language to that effect with majority direction.
Yeah, I'm just. I would favor doing something like that than changing the number that the community works so hard on coming to a compromise. I think it would. But I also understand Mr. Dyer's concern that he not you know, that if sounds like he's ready to become go beyond his five some other location And I don't think he should have to jump through a whole bunch of extra hoops.
He should have to jump through every hoop that the basic permit he needs, but he shouldn't have to jump through the formula business hoops if he was already here.
Do you want to put a motion on the table before we
continue? Request that we reopen the public hearing to comment on what is being proposed I'm a little bit uneasy. Although it sounds good. I don't have Yeah, that's Is that okay
sure. Okay. We'll go we'll go ahead and open the public hearing reopen it I
3:36 – 3:4233 turns
I completely understand Jack's concern. I do know that the evaluation of the language on this has been going on for two years, so my initial response is I would understand if it was relating to the particular location that they were already in. But if anybody's opening another location, that's kind of the entire point of what we're doing here.
Right?
You know so I think that if you're opening a sixth location, you should be subject to the formula code irrespective if you already have a business here or not. So if his permit is within the walls of his pre-existing location then I completely understand it because it's there but if we're talking about
That's what I'm trying to address, not a new location. So just in
that place?
Just the... If we just take Mr. Dyer as an example, just his spot there on Ojai Avenue, that he wouldn't have to jump through additional permit hoops other than what he is required to permit for.
That it doesn't trigger the
familiar. It doesn't trigger it but if obviously, if he did build another place in Ojai Then he would have to go through everything that any other
Business, it
was more than five.
May I ask a question while I'm up here? Yeah So within the code are we for example covered If a business has five businesses already and they want to add a sixth but decide to change the name. So if we have Starbucks and then we do cafe by Starbucks where is the gray line of what's triggering it if we have the same owner but if it's something that's not as easily identifiable have we closed that loophole there?
That's where there's the six criteria that each business is evaluated on. So if they come in and they don't have the same items, the same signs, the same name yada yada yada then they could open a business. If they have two of those criteria matching you know cafe by Starbucks but it's still Starbucks coffee and Starbucks menu then it's a Starbucks. You know so that's sort of how it's looked at.
And ownership is not one of the criteria?
Yeah, I just thought that was interesting.
It's not
yeah it's not part of the criteria so So does it limit franchise? Yes, just based on how many there are by nature. Okay cool. Thank you.
Franchise of larger than five
11 I think
Currently eleven but proposed to be down to five
Thank You Bianca we'll go ahead and yep
Someone is already has a business here. I don't know what kind of permits and stuff they would be needing in the future Expanding the business where it's located? It would be
expansion as possible. Also possible is you could imagine some outside state requirement that triggers some change to the building, that then triggers a city permit.
But they already... They precede the form of the business so I'm not sure what how they wouldn't be treated like any other business that needs to expand Well if following conditional use
scenario that we're talking about is if they built another place in another jurisdiction so that they now had the numbers that they were would be considered a formula business. If they had to, if they decided they wanted to you know put in some TAP system that for some reason required a construction permit Then, Mr. Dyer's concern that he'd have to go through all of these CUP requirements that we've put in just to do a normal construction thing within the four walls that he's already allowed to conduct his
business. Yeah I understand that they're not a formula business if they are established here as having four and one let's say if they add other units elsewhere that doesn't make them a formula business
They would be subject to the foreign business ordinance if they attempt to add another location. Yeah, I have another location. They also would be subject to it if they come in for another permit inside the city. Most of the time another permit inside the city is not going to be triggered because it's an existing business. Concern that's been raised is if another If some for whatever reason another permit is needed and there's more locations outside the city that trigger it above More than five six or more Then it would be subject to this ordinance and may or may not meet the standards unless the council adds that express exemption
so this paragraph here about existing formula retail establishments would be considered under the non-conforming use category. Right,
and the non-conforming use ordinance allows certain expansions but not all. The other component that might be part of this although I haven't analyzed Mr. Dyer's case is there are certain limitations or straight prohibitions rather for downtown commercial land use designation formula businesses that have street frontage more than 25 linear feet right now Mr. Dyer's business is five it's not subject to that requirement if you were to add another location outside the city And the relevant front end was more than that and he wanted a permit, then there might be a problem. The proposed language from Council Member Whitman would solve that for his existing
location.
So an existing location would be able to expand without being considered a form of business. Correct if the language conditions of conditional use permit to have to expand the business because you have
to meet all the criteria for expansion but not the formula business criteria.
One more. OK
Larry.
3:42 – 3:5814 turns
The idea of grandfathering makes a lot of sense based on the, I believe they call it an APN, the lot number. If all they're going to do is expand on their own lot and it's the same usage and it's not They're not going to rent it out to a sub-tenant like Starbucks or something. It's going to be the same business, then you should just grandfather it and call it a day and that's the end of it. If they're here and they're not going to open another location in town and they're not going to add a separate business in their building that is formula or not formula, then your grandfather can just call it a day. Just keep it simple instead of creating more issues Just grandfather done if Mr. Dyer wants to add 3,000 feet to his building and he can do it within the code without variances and all this other nonsense then fine if he has to come before the council then he has to come through the council but not for getting a number five or number six business just grandfather and just keep it very simple
Thank you Larry. Okay, we will go ahead and close the re-close the public hearing Is there a motion that a council member would like to put on the table?
I'd move that we approve The five or we introduce the five Business Well what's been proposed to us tonight but with the addition of language And all We got to come back for a second reading anyways, right? so the addition of language that allows an existing business as of the date of the adoption To avoid Additional permit permitting requirements that are Created by this code just exempts them.
I'll second that
Okay, any discussion before we vote? Okay. I would just like to thank staff in the planning department specifically for working so hard on this and thank you community members for weighing in and going to all the meetings because They clearly were really productive. So thank you all. All right roll call, please. Listen,
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Okay, great.
Thank you very much.
Let me
just
make one clarifying comment. The public does understand that there are already businesses that our small town couldn't handle unless we allowed banks, real estate, insurance to come in. That's a whole different category. Those are the kind of chains we allow out of necessity. There was some comment made about that somewhere during this discussion but we already allow that yeah
there's a couple that exist by various quirks of the past the ordinance just introduced does include an express exemption for banks and financial services gas stations and business administration professional offices like real estate or insurance
yeah okay thank you
All right. We'll move on to agenda item number four, the budget workshop two fiscal year 23-24 general fund budget. James we have a staff report?
Yes thank you so this we went through the budget in detail at the end of last meeting I Mistakenly bragged that we'd get to it much earlier today and a little bit earlier, but not not much earlier But we're gonna keep it very brief today. I think it's five slides compared to 15 or whatever It was the last time so Because we already did go through it So I just as a reminder and in case anybody tuned out at 11 o'clock last time We have a proposed general fund budget. The proposed budget I think is overall, considering where we were four years ago which this slide shows, I think we're in a place that we would've been happy to know that we'd be at at that point. This slide shows that during COVID, our revenues dropped to $10 million. And at one point they were on pace to be much lower than that and just businesses were able to open up at the right time.
But that is several million dollars lower than I think we would have been without COVID. So then showing in 21-22, we rebounded to about 14.8 million. Looks like we're about in the same range this year. We said this a lot at the last meeting but revenues really bounced back after businesses reopened but we don't have a lot of growth seems like that comes up on every topic. But we don' have a lot of growth so they've been pretty flat over the last couple years and I think that's about what we're gonna see moving forward at this point.
So $14.8 million budget in 21, or revenues in 21-22, $147 million 22-23 and we're projecting 14.9 million in 23-24 for I gave a lot of background on why at the last meeting but one of the key things is looking at some of the businesses that look to be opening later on in the year should have a slight increase from prior years So then we went through the budget and we talked about the expenditures that we have, and what priorities we were building into the budget.
With those four priorities being deferred, catching up on deferred maintenance. It's not a secret that usually when you have budget challenges, you start holding off on fixing things. And I think that's something that the city has done over many, many years. And so we were looking at trying to make sure we're catching up on those things especially while the quote-unquote times are good, we should be trying to catch up.
We have talked a lot about paving over the last several meetings but we pointed out at the last meeting that over five years we'll likely have to pave about 10 to $15 million to catch up on paving So that's something that we need to start preparing for and make sure that we budget for. Other than deferred maintenance, we also talked about paying down our debt which for the city fortunately we don't have a lot of debt but the debt we do have is unfunded pension liability and retiree medical liability so those are included in the budget to pay this year share and to prepay some of the future years Third priority is staffing.
Just like every other business in town, it's very hard to fill critical positions right now. It seems like there's help wanted signs everywhere and we probably need to invest in some for City Hall but the budget... We were able to start filling positions this year and the budget includes the funding to keep filling positions and where we've made progress on that in the last couple months but there's still a few key positions left And then building reserves, which the good news is that we did a really good job over the last two years of building reserves.
And so that is also included in the budget and it's included in the budget in the line item that says cannabis tax transfer. Which is essentially the city when we passed a cannabis tax said that until we hit our reserve goal, we would transfer the cannabis tax to our reserves. Our emergency reserve or rainy day fund and so in the proposed budget that's still included at this time.
And so other key items, those are the four priorities that sort of shape the budget. There are a couple key items that I think we've gotten a lot of questions about and we've had a lot of conversation about. One is the budget does include a contingency's budget but it's at a reduced level from last year. Last year was $550,000 in contingency which is the most we ever had but it was because we had a filling kind of looking at the horizon that we had a lot of expenses, you know, expenses that may happen at that time and then have happened since then.
And one of those, the next line item is that there were a couple of lawsuits that we had thought maybe ahead and those ended up happening Um, so one thing that you'll notice in this year's budget is sort of we're trying to make our budget better match reality. Last year we had more money and contingencies $100,000 more in contingencies and 100,000 less than attorneys cost but that hundred thousand really did go to the attorneys costs last year. So in this year's budget, we're just trying to be more realistic. And we essentially flip-flopped where that $100,000 that got pulled out of contingencies is going to the attorney's costs because now we know that there are those lawsuits that we just speculated about a year ago.
So those two line items, contingencies goes from 550 to 450 and then attorney services go from 296 to 398. So essentially I'm saying they sort of balance out but that's how we reflected it in the budget to try to be more accurate in the budget. Additionally, the Ojai Museum, we included that as a line item at the direction of council last year. It hadn't been a line item prior but last year there was an agreement to include it as a line item with $60,000 in funding so that is included in the budget.
Community grant funding, it was what we had called it in the past. I mentioned this towards the end of the last meeting. The idea this year obviously subject to council discussion and I think regardless of how you move forward will probably have an item in the future in the next month to two months to talk about process and everything. But the idea was rather than creating a separate line item, which had sort of started to feel like a quota of we have this much and we need to give this much away. Which I just think didn't really work well and isn't necessarily a best practice. So rather than doing that, the idea would be this year to move to a contractor arrangement for community funding.
Contracting for services and then either using contract budgets or contingencies budgets The I think there's good and there's bad. I think the good to that is I think it'll lead to maybe better accountability and Ensuring that the city is getting the Service that it wants to get versus a grant where you're just giving the money away and hoping that you're getting what you want to get The challenge with it, is that it also means that just like everything else There's a lot of things we want to do and at the end of the day, they compete and we have to decide which ones are priorities this year and which ones are priorities in future years.
So that's a process that we should probably talk further about but that's how, that's the idea sort of built into the budget obviously subject to the approval or direction of the council. And then the Arts Commission, it's included in the budget at $37,850. But if you remember they presented last week that they've developed their five-year plan and they had requested a little increase I think it was about $5,000 so when we revised the budget to balance it we will include that addition just we got a couple questions on that And so, essentially at this point what I know it's already getting late so I'll try to keep it very, very brief but for real this time. Yeah.
For real this time. But, So what we did to try to help with that is we looked at the budget. We tried to make sure we still are prioritizing those key categories, but we looked at what minor adjustments can we make that would essentially result in a balanced budget. And so I have come up and recommended this path which is right now we're $200,000 upside down If we reduce our TOT transfer to CIP by $50,000. We reduce our contingency budget by $50 thousand. We reduce the prepayment of retiree medical and prepayment of unfunded pension by 50 thousand each which those puts those back to the level they were last year so we're not cutting it it's just we're not increasing it with you know which was a good goal to have that we'd essentially have a balanced budget.
And so, you know, that's the easy button if we wanna have an easy option to have a balanced budget I think that's it. We're still doing what we need to do because we still are transferring money to the CIP to help pay for streets. We're still transferring or we still have a contingency fund to do the things we really need to do. We'll still pre-paying debt maybe just not at the level that I think we'd all like to do So that is the recommendation. Obviously council would have multiple options, probably thousands of options theoretically of going through and looking at line items and making reductions, making adjustments. I think ultimately we have a pretty good budget that really will allow the city to do the priorities that it wants to do The budget committee agreed and they recommended approval of the budget unanimously.
So I think that it's a good budget, but obviously there is room for council discussion and deliberation. You know just as an example, you know if we have the four priorities of the council this year said well this year we don't need to transfer money to the CIP so take the 200 out of that and you can leave everything else. That's another example of how he could balance it. But again, I think We're able to accomplish all four of those key priorities.
And so I think instead of cutting one out completely, just reducing a little bit from each of those categories would balance the budget in a pretty painless way. With that, the direction we're looking for tonight is feedback and then direction on ideas or what the council would like to see to balance the budget. The next step is third budget workshop in two weeks will be on the CIP capital improvement projects. And then the fourth budget workshop in early June would be bringing back the general fund and the CIP with the changes that the council requests or directs. So we're hoping to get the feedback on the general fund tonight to move that forward, so happy to answer any questions.
3:58 – 4:0530 turns
Thank you James much gratitude a lot of work. Questions?
Okay, two separate questions for The proposal to go to what you're calling contract services Does that include the Chamber of Commerce that my valley green coalition and their eight-acre campus?
It would be up the specific Services would be up to the council. So Mine is my recommendation is like the approach but then it's up to the council to say here's the services We want to purchase
so tonight
No, that of course the council could give direction on that tonight but I didn't anticipate it because I know that's a longer discussion. So I think right before this meeting, I've gotten sort of some proposals from some groups at the Council in the past has indicated that they would like to support. And so I've sent those to the council, but I think I would expect the council would want some time to read those and think about it Yeah, yeah and come back
Okay. My second question is Do you put the City Council? stipend under expenditures salaries and benefits Is that the category?
Yes, and so there we are finalizing the long form version which is the couple hundred page document.
Okay?
And so yeah, we're finally in that will send that out The idea was the initial discussion would be very high level obviously it turned into two discussions So it didn't quite work as planned but But so but that breakdown will have each department including the City Council Department is how it's referred to in the budget and it'll show those salaries for each of those departments
So, can we do a cost-of-living increase? For the city council. It's been I think at least eight years Especially considering how much more expensive housing is in the city limit
Yeah, the council does have the choice of whether to do that. In the budget... Yes, the city attorney's probably gonna jump in on that but in the budget we included some cost-of-living increases but I don't believe offhand that we included for council it's probably a minor amount because we only have five council members and it's a part time salary essentially So if we're gonna do that, I'd probably have to make a minor adjustment but it wouldn't be anything major. It wouldn't be a large sum. I think the last time we did it was a couple thousand dollars.
Do you need council direction? Mayor
and Councilor Veidt can jump in on that one two key points about council salaries Yes, the council can look at adding a cost of living adjustment. One key point to bear in mind is that the state law limits the amount of that adjustment and we'd have to run the math. It's essentially 5% per year of each of the last years so if it's eight years you get about 40%. So it's probably gonna be under inflation and that's because the government code sets the rule. Second, it does not take effect until after the next election So the council can raise the future council salary.
That's good. I think it's that's you know, it's important the idea voters had concerns they can express those for more diversity on the council. That's the bottom line
Can you give us an idea of how much? money we'd be talking about and So there'd be another amount of money. We'd have to yeah Yeah, I don't know what they're
off the top my head is Mike. Yes Let me do some quick math I think it's like in the couple of thousands, a couple thousand dollar range. I don't think it's much. I mean depending on how much of an increase we make but we have five part-time positions basically so 5% a year for five part time positions probably isn't more than a few thousand dollars
But just a clarifying question on that We could do that, but it wouldn't go into effect until four years down the road.
Mm-hmm and would it be? Okay, okay And it would be us It would be a separate item that would come back because it is
a ordinance an ordinance state law requires the council salary visa by ordinance So we would come back with an ordinance that would be introduced adopted and then take effect With the seating in the new council in December 2024
So it would be for some future budget discussion.
No, it would happen now.
Actually that's a good point with the timing of the election we probably wouldn't need to adjust this budget we'd need to adjust or we need to plan for
it in next year's budget. Yeah
if adopted by the council it would take effect with the first paycheck and after the new council seated in December 2024 which is part of the next budget cycle fiscal 24-25 yeah but you could still adopt it too then take effect
Yeah, I would like to do that
but it wouldn't impact this year this yeah
for the future council. That's good For many reasons it's important that we do it makes it much less awkward and then secondly Any council member that's concerned doesn't have to take the funds Johnny never took salary if you are if you have a nice Retirement check and you don't want the money you can just put it back in the pot or donate it to help of Ojai
Any other questions before we go to public
comment So the last page you showed us with your proposal about what the option closing the gap was that something that the Budget Committee studied and And it's their recommendation or I
No, the Budget Committee ultimately liked the existing budget and recommended it but essentially had said if the last couple decisions are based on the Council's priorities then the Council should make those decisions. Because there are more policy questions. Policy of, you know, do we increase our prepayment of our pension liability? You know those are sort of the Budget Committee deferred those to the Council.
4:05 – 4:1215 turns
Any other questions? Leslie, you
have
a
question. Yeah, this is just more process if we want to. Is this the time to speak directly to line items or should I wait till after public comment?
If it's a question on a line item, it would be appropriate now and then if you just I think it's closer to
discussion. OK, yeah.
OK. We will start with Brian Akins and then Bill Miley.
Hello council for those that are watching I'm up here again this time with a different hat on. I am the president of the Ojai Valley Museum, that would be on page 4-6 line item 43. So I was here a couple weeks ago We had a 17-year-old beagle who was going downhill, and so I got texts and I had to run out. Matiloha Veterinary nicely sent her on the next day.
So I did watch the rest, and it was actually you got to the budget three hours after I left. So there was some benefit to that. However, I didn't watch it until right at 830, so I stayed up kind of in sync with the rest of you. I did watch that. I did pay attention to what you were saying. A key thing that you mentioned two weeks ago, you've mentioned here is the contract We kind of feel that we have been in a contractual relationship with the City Council for the many years that we've come before you. When we came before you, it was during dire straits and without the funding, the museum would have been closed.
So but we said in that that the funds would go just towards operations No funds go towards salaries in any way If you looked at their salary, you know, that's true But so we and in the past I've given to you financial details that show those line items by month I'm happy to provide those again also provided all of the report from our executive director Winnie Barker on the fabulous things we've done.
So, we're happy to do those things. We do appreciate the support from the city. It was wonderful that the Commissioner Appreciation Dinner was held at the museum. It got us a chance to show off everything to everybody and come on back. We love it! We are always maintaining our financials. We look at them, we have a finance committee. Some may not know that eight plus years ago Bill Wyrick was on our finance committee he had taken his dad's spot then he got elected he came here now he's back on the Finance Committee because he's taking this mom spot you know she's 90 something and thought maybe she should retire But we are doing different things. We're looking at expenses We did just have feasting on history art and beautiful homes this last Saturday it's a wonderful event because we get these wonderful people that have either a historic art or Beautiful home to be the host for the night and to provide the dinner So our only real expenses is the upfront advertising and so we net about eight thousand dollars on that So that's one of our big events I will tell you that like as seen in other places, we did an annual appeal.
What we saw was we had more donations that came to us but a lesser amount and we've heard that's pretty true for a lot of the nonprofits so we are working hard and we appreciate the support that we have from each of you.
Thank you
Brian. Can I just, I just want to thank you and thank the museum. I think that part of a vibrant town is a museum, is a playhouse but most especially the museum is really really special and thank you for what you do and the fact that you do it on $60,000 from the city and whatever else you manage to fundraise. I think it's astounding I just love it. And I think it's great and thank you Thank you, and thank you to the staff and the volunteers and everyone who works so hard to Give that gift to our city
Yes, we have a wonderful staff
Thank You Brian, thank you much Bill Miley
Good evening One, having reserves to run the city government when in an economic downturn is certainly important and preventive. It seems that having close to 80% of the current general fund budget is supported by many. Two, our main sources of revenue – this is partly for the public Our hotel and motel room taxes at 15%, which produces $6 million. Cannabis tax at 3% which produces 250,000. The sales tax is 7 1⁄4% which produces about 2 1⁽ million.
Property tax which produces about 2 1⁽ million. And the in-lieu vehicle tax which produces about one million. Three. We have need for filling in health and pension deficits for our employees. We have need for paving repair for our streets. We have a need for increased help for the homeless, unhoused folks who have historically connections to our city which mean they kind of grew up here.
We have a need for increased help to prevent loss of housing through rental assistance program, which is part of the county continuum of care system. Four. It's my opinion that about $12 million is needed to produce an 80% reserve gradually filled in. Currently we have about 7 million in reserve as I understand. We need 5 million more. 5. We currently have the cannabis tax of $250,000 going to this reserve and will take a few years 6.
It seems prudent for this council that it seriously consider proposing increasing the sales tax by 1-2% since And if approved by our voters, we'd raise an estimated $2,500,000 each year for each cent. Two cents would give us five million dollars a year and our tourist industry would provide most of this. And in conclusion, a chronic concern we have and others have is helping with the continuum of care system of loss of housing and rehousing needs commonly known as the homeless problem.
In my opinion, our city should be budgeting a new $100,000 for a continuum of care system of services in this area. Thank you.
Thank you, Bill. Weston any comments online?
Yes we have Renee. Renee you have the floor.
4:13 – 4:2520 turns
Good evening Council it's again late at night so kudos to James again for revenues being much higher than expected by 1.3 million dollars And saving $500,000 in unfilled positions. But I still want to reiterate, I do believe Ojai has some financial issues that really need to be looked at and Many cities, and including the school district are calling it a structural deficit. Something that reoccurs year after year after year because your expenses are more than your revenues.
And in the school district situation is much different. I don't want to put that overlay on the city of Ojai you're not in that situation. But you do have very limited sources of income. And you also have very big capital improvement projects that need to be anticipated for and budgeted for including the ATP project and the five-year road maintenance plan. So in my estimation, you can't really look at your general fund budget without looking at your long term unfunded liabilities and your capital improvement projects. And you can't start saying what your reserves should be until you know what those long term Unfunded liabilities are deferred maintenance and roads are going to be expensive. The ATP project is going to be expensive, so please don't underestimate those projects.
I also think James that even though we know salaries are up to $3.8 million, that's an 18% increase from the 22-23 budget. That's well above a cost of living increase. So I do believe you need to explain what the positions are that you're adding to the budget, the number of positions you're adding, the number of FTEs, the number of part time employees because that's a substantial increase, 18%.
In salaries. So I think you need to have some kind of a schedule that you show that explains what new positions your funding before you start saying we've got to cut the budget and have unmet needs.
Thank you Renee.
Community projects, I think you need to fund the community demo garden and help of Ojai. They need to have the city's financial support.
Thank you Renee is that it Weston?
Yes that's all.
And just to clarify on that question about salaries, James. From my understanding you didn't fill well there were a lot of positions that were not filled during COVID and you did such a miracle pulled off a miracle by keeping us afloat There's still positions that are not filled.
Yeah, part of that is exactly it was like I said this last time that some of that's not by choice We couldn't we couldn't you know? We don't have a public works director or now we have we have an interim part-time public works director who's doing a great job but But we would like to have a full-time Public Works Director. We didn't last year so it appears to be an increase but it's really just filling vacancies and But I went last time there were a couple positions. We talked about adding one was a planner position for the planning department because the city's always only had zero or one planners and then If you lose a person, you essentially lose all institutional knowledge on probably the department that needs the institutional knowledge the most So it's a planner position There's a recreation position again because they were cut because we didn't have recreation because people weren't allowed to recreate first four years Now as we add it back and we start to build up, we're adding back rec department like kind of a little bit at a time too.
And then we have a couple adjustments to the trolley department that we still have to work out our personnel situation so I don't want to get too far into the detail because it involves personnel stuff but basically we're trying to figure out how to get enough drivers to restore our routes. We still only have one of the two routes operating So yes, there is not an 18% increase unfortunately. It would be great if there was but no it's more positions and then honestly we are planning to propose a cost of living adjustment that will not keep up with inflation. That's what's in the budget
so. Thank you for clarifying thank you for maintaining such an incredible staff really we're lucky
You also said last time that there were some positions That you increased the salary because we were losing Thank you a competitive market correct where? We just couldn't compete with what other people were paying. So you I Raise those salaries in order to
We're we'd like we'd like to yeah, exactly. So we're proposing increasing our all our public works crew members Which I take pride in because you know the narrative usually is like that You know the directors and the city manager get the raises well That we haven't had that be the case the last couple years, and this year we're proposing that the people that we need to give the raises to are the public works crew who are out there getting things done. And who in the agencies around us are getting paid more and they're now starting to be interested in going to those other agencies so.
Thanks James all right well what we're moving on to discussion so would anyone yeah.
Larry did you want to speak? Did you have a card? Okay. Well,
go ahead
Larry. I'm
sorry.
How is it that the Maricopa is sucking up all the energy and all the money in our community? We're going to be $2 million, $3 million, $4 million. We have no idea what the easements or any other lawsuits are going to... And then we're out here spending money on housing, on electric bicycles, on pay raises and all this work that we all want to get done And you're putting aside all this three million, whatever the millions are going into the Maricopa. You want to do Ojai Avenue? Then separate it and if the state doesn't let you, do it anyway because this is getting absurd. We're living on grants and we're not generating enough income to do all the things that you good people and all we need. You've got to raise either more money or cut your expenses.
I mean, this is like spending money on a vacation while the pipes are leaking OK, I mean this is getting absurd. I mean we don't have enough money to do all the things that everybody wants to do and the Maricopa is just millions. And then more lawsuits. Because that's going to happen, because somebody is going to want an appraisal and there's going to be an argument. And it's going to go into court and they're going to argue about valuations over leases and valuations over parking and dirt and on vines and all the property and the numbers are just going to corkscrew into the air.
So you've got us just say no and end it. If the state wants their money back, go talk to our state rep and tell him to do his job and say we don't have to put the money back but let's get on with it because we just can't afford it.
Thank you, Larry. All right moving on to discussion. Who would like to? Leslie?
Yeah so we're really not going to delve into line items but I think we've spoken there's two ways that you balance a budget. You either increase the top line or decrease the bottom line And I do believe with the people that have spoken, that we need to seriously look at increasing the top line. That is whether it's sales tax or the TOT, or I don't think the cannabis tax is up there, or a transfer tax which gets me into sort of property taxes. Thank you very much. Thank you for having me.
So those kinds of things, so I am most definitely in support of figuring out revenue streams. Thank you Larry for your comments but I voted yes on the ATP and I stand solid with that but I also understand we need to find that money. I think it's part, I think the ATP is part of envisioning exactly what the future of Ojai is gonna look like with ecotourism and many other things.
But we need... To the extent that we think we have the money we need to do the things we do, I don't think we actually do. I think we need more money and so we need to increase revenue because I don' think there's anything to decrease so I'm gonna leave it with that I'd like us to prioritize figuring out what taxes would be most appropriate, talking to the inn and talking to the TOT people. Seeing how they feel about things. And then I don't know what our relationship is with them actually perhaps people on the council have a better idea do we have a really good relationship? Can we go to them and say this is for the good of everybody including That come to visit us. So, you know, are you supportive that kind of thing?
And I am happy and would be happy to go through line item by line item but I think that can be for the next budget discussion especially once we get the You know the back sheets basically that lead to these totals and then we can discuss more in depth like where we might go so that's That's me in my opinion
Rachel raise your hand
So to that point, I think that this budget you've done such a great job on it and I think this is a really solid budget. And one thing I would like to see us talk about In the future, even though it's not on the agenda tonight, I would like to see us talk about specifically coming up with an economic development committee or looking at increasing sales tax but making a concerted effort to look at the revenue streams that are coming into the community. and seeing how we can create new ones, how we can reimagine the ones that we have because I think there are tremendous opportunities. And I'm learning so much about what other communities are doing right now not just here in Ventura County but all over the world and I think that there's a lot more we could be doing on that front as well.
4:25 – 4:309 turns
Yes, so my understanding on taxes Which I think well first. I think we have that as a something that's on the Agenda items that we're waiting to move forward but yes Yeah, the idea of looking at multiple new new taxes or tax increases While also looking at where we would Prioritize the revenues generated from that but it's also important, you know for the public to now That at least it's my understanding that most taxes We as a council can't Approve we have to take it to the voters As a ballot measure and the voters have to vote it in. I
And that's when we bring the item that gives the options. We'll go through that but most options require voter
approval. So that's going to be some future budget I'm gonna echo what everybody else has said. I think that it's great that a really good job has been done to present us with this budget. Happy that we're only talking about the $200,000 need to balance. And I am in favor of all of those take care of the future measures that you're proposing for us You know, particularly increasing our reserves and paying down our future liabilities.
I guess that's it.
Okay, Susan. So can you clarify to raise the tax any taxes we have to put it on a voter ballot measure and but We have to propose that now right so get it on the ballot and Yes. They're in March or November of 2024, right? Yeah
and we were looking at maybe trying to get an agenda item back to council around first meeting of July which might sound far but that's basically three meetings and we have three full meetings But so there's that point. Most taxes, the short version is that most of the taxes would require voter approval. The one off the top of my head that doesn't I think I said this last meeting but we have pre-approval on the cannabis tax so that's one option if the council was trying to do something immediately but other than that most of the ones I can think of would be voter approval but we'll bring that option in July and then that would allow us to put it on one of the ballots in 2024
One more key note, which ballot triggers in part what kind of tax it is. There's a general rule subject to a couple of exceptions. A general tax has to be on a general ballot so that'd be the November 24 ballot unless it's put there by voter petition under current case law That case law is in danger of being overturned by the California Business Taxpayers Initiative.
That's also going to be on the November 2024 ballot, so if we get something voter approved in March there's a risk a general tax put on the March ballot via voter petition might be invalidated by the November ballot. So safe answer, general tax meaning available for any city service, November 2024 ballots. So it would help the future but won't necessarily solve this particular budget. But as noted cannabis, the voters approved up to 10% and that can be adjusted from the 3% that is at now by council without further vote approval because the voters already approved it.
Yeah yeah I'm very hesitant
Okay, well I just like to say it sounds like we're all in agreement that We would like to move forward tonight and also that we have a great deal of gratitude To you James and Pam if you're listening. I hope you're listening for we're working so hard and And at these key these four key priorities the deferred maintenance the trees the parks the paving pay down unfunded pensions staffing building reserves are really really important and it's time that we take care of those so Is somebody ready to make a motion?
I'll make a motion to approve the budget. And we will return with the future workshop with the balanced budget.
4:30 – 4:3834 turns
Yes, I did mm-hmm more or less
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion to approve the budget. And we will return with the future workshop with the balanced budget. Yes, I did mm-hmm more or less
Show transcript
Okay, wonderful All right, it's 1030 council. We have one more item are we? Thank you. No, we just have oh yeah no I'm sorry we have two more yes okay so
we will move on to item number five. Nohai day after 1030. Yes
generally
I think we need to we
need to I need to end you know at a reasonable
time but our general rule is that we don't start new items after 1030 I'm sorry, 10 o'clock. We're hope-free!
So the only issue is that we have to start opening up applications to the public and stuff. I was planning to basically just recommend that we go back to the street because the survey results were overwhelming, so I think we will proceed in that way unless I hear...
We do have one we do have one public Jamie Fleming who's been so patiently
waiting. Yeah
I'm not in favor, but the survey results were overwhelming
If we chose to close the street that we had to have a big event without a town vendor
Yeah, that's the challenge. You know in the survey everybody sort of said well we want it big but we don't want it touristy and the challenge is I thought what we had kind of explained to everybody as it's one or the other because the problem is if it's... The reason why it's in the park right now is because to keep it local we have way fewer vendors and we only have Ojai vendors If we're going to open it up and make it big and allow everybody to come in, then we can do it. We can fill the street but then it is everybody coming in. And for anybody who doesn't remember in 2019 right before COVID, we had a lot of complaints about all the tourists that were taking over Ojai. I don't want
to talk about
this.
Hang on. All right. But wait, I have a question. Sure. Why is it, I still don't understand why it's either or. My idea is close the street and open it up for the kids so they can ride their skateboards, we can have bicycling. It can be a real community event. We only have to figure out how to pay for that.
Yeah, we could close the street. To your point, we could close the street and And still have fewer vendors and everything else. I think the concern we have is that, I think the perception would be oh this is a terrible Ojai day there's all this empty space you know all this but maybe if we figured out how to like message that and get it through people A lot of people did say that they just remember the street being closed and sort of want that feeling back. So maybe people won't care if it's a small event with the street closed, but those it's sort of all the things we're struggling with I ended up like I said based on the survey results which were overwhelmingly that they want the street closed.
I'm sort of at the point, let's try it for a year and let's see how it goes. It might naturally be smaller because we haven't had all the outside vendors for two years. They might not come back this year. That's
good.
So we can
still have the Martindale
intersection. So I think that's it. We probably basically tried to do the best we can, but it's probably going to be smaller than it
was in the past. Is there an OJ committee still?
No, there's not an Ojai Day committee. The last three years we essentially had like one staff person. Last year it was Weston so he can tell you all the details and he probably lost some hair from it. Is he
the one if we have some ideas to go to?
Well so this year it's Kiara who is our new events person. And so we'll be working with her but I think I'm at the point maybe that's really it and we could almost keep it that simple I think people want to try it in the street. I think we'll do our best. It might be smaller this year, and if everybody's okay with that, we'll try it in the street.
Jamie, thank you for staying.
Jamie Fleming, Chamber of Commerce. I'm glad to hear that it might be going back to the street, but I'm very cautious as to how I state that. By the way before I go too far Weston you did a great job last year very organized really was well done and I think the last two years gave us a good chance to see us get it more of a local Ojai feeling and I still personally think if we just keep having to grow carefully and keep that local Ojai feeling is gonna be great Why I wanted to talk to you tonight is I? Also was very in tune as to where everything was headed and I knew we might end up in the street Which I think might give us that little extra energy because I think a lot more people will Want to come because then they think it's Ojai day because they think that's special.
However All the years before if we have maybe forgotten The downtown merchants that was turning into their worst sales day of the year And it had not so much to do with the fact that the street was closed. It was the way we positioned all those vendors where the backs of them were all facing the stores, the backs were facing the park and you walked down the middle. So it's almost like a gauntlet and people would not naturally be able to see the stores or go in them.
And the last two years, especially last year, the stores, the few that I talked to their sales had all been really good actually because they weren't blocked off and people weren't just caught up with just walking down this venue of just vendors. So I'm encouraging that yes if we go with the street open which I think might add that extra energy and I like your idea Sousa and that's what I also told the city when they talked to me. I said musicians, jugglers maybe a few vendors But if we could really not then block off our poor downtown merchants with just a blockade of tents and vendors, but spread it out so that people include our stores. Then I would be very much in favor and I think this could be a great way to carefully grow this. But please let's not sacrifice our stores with the worst sales day again of the year just for opening a street and having all those vendors.
Thank you, Jamie. Any comments online, Weston?
Yes. We have one raised hand from Renee. Renee, you have the floor.
Thank you. You know what I agree with everything that Jamie said? I loved the smaller in-the-park feeling. I really did think that it was more of an opportunity to connect with local residents and local merchants but I also liked the idea of having the street open and the Martindale And I know that there could be a stage or something that would have local talent. I know the local talent was always a big hit where people had a place to go sing and dance, and I think riding bikes or juggling or whatever. I love that idea! Without having all of these big out-of-town vendors in town trying to sell their wares and promote their wares, I just think it's too much. It's just way too much.
So I like the idea of openness but small town feeling at the same time. Thank you.
Thank you, Renee. Is that it, Weston?
Yes, that's all.
Okay, let's move on to discussion. Anyone ready to make a motion?
I want to make a great idea. Let's say something like two to four dancing in the street. You know, we'll figure out the time according to the weather but you know just take advantage so people know what it's like to have a our beauty That's like a European downtown with the key shopping area and the park no cars You know that's how it should be if it wasn't a state highway
4:38 – 4:5359 turns
So would we how should the motion be worded that I Man. I mean, basically all we're deciding right now is to close the street.
I think that's really it
and then we will do the other things to keep it within the parameters that we would like.
And then just to just the caveat is that we have to apply for permits through Caltrans to close the street. So I think its motion direction for us to go through that process obviously. I don't expect that they would reject it but since we haven't done it for a couple of years where we're sort of figuring you know figuring out how that's going to work
And it costs us about, if I'm reading this right, about between $10,000 and $15,000 more to do a closed street.
Exactly, exactly and we included that in the budget kind of anticipating when we were putting the budget together the survey results were coming in and I sort of saw where it was going so we've included that in the budget this year
Yeah, I guess I would say that feedback that I've received has been overwhelmingly in favor of the closed street. But I think maybe we should be looking at doing the vendor situation in a way that makes clear that the stores are open as
well.
Maybe work with merchants ahead of time on how to incorporate their businesses into the event so they don't feel like they're being shuttered or
And let's really make it an educational event and encourage this to be Ojai's car-free day where, you know, impossible. So that, you know, and tie it in with education about climate change and all of that just—and, you know, make it really nice for people.
Yeah, this would be basically a discussion with Chiara and you know people I mean the process would be such that people would go with ideas to Chiara And she might or might not decide to have a working group
If everybody you know sort of just the reminder for everybody council city manager form of government Ideas come through me and then we see what there's a consensus for and then we proceed I think at this point, I think I've got the sense of it like big picture. So we'll start working on that big picture plan and then we'll try to do sort of status updates and adjust as we go. Okay
all right well we have a motion do we have a second?
I make a motion
to direct the city manager to
proceed with getting permits from Caltrans to close 150 per the norm of Ojai day. We will postpone
item
number
seven. We'll move on to
council member reports.
Well I would like to report, I went to SCAG Southern California Association Government Conference in Palm Desert. Very interesting really met a lot of very interesting people the theme was on the environment transportation economy and housing and how they all intersect so The high point was meeting Dolores Huerta, who is the founder of the United Farm Workers Union with Cesar Chavez. She's 93 and she spoke about how we're all connected and we need to live that way so that was very inspiring. And I also went into a workshop on electrifying our fleet which was super interesting.
Thanks for sending me. Also, it's National Nursing Week so make sure to say thank you to the nurses. I read a proclamation yesterday at the Continuing Care Center behind the hospital which is a beautiful new center if you haven't seen it and the art there is incredible. So thanks to Barbara Hirsch for that. And then the Green Valley project did some plantings over the weekend, which is really exciting at the Humane Society and Mesa our new on Gorman the Transitional housing for kids coming out of foster care. So it's a good weekend anybody else
Yes, I have. Okay so we had there were many of us elected officials and individual people from Ventura County who took part in the first five Ventura activity where we read to children and I got to go to Noah's Ark with Eric Knight of the Humane Society and we read together, and it was really great to support an incredible organization that does so much for the kids of our community.
And then also I just wanted to say that I'm on the Council Member Rule and she's the alternative but I serve on the Gold Coast Transportation District Board And there is a big event happening this Wednesday. They're introducing all the green technology that they're using right now for the fleets, the trolley is a part of that. but all of the bus systems in Ventura County, and they're moving to hydrogen fuel cells. So there's a lot happening with that, with the electrification of transportation in this area and also with reducing our, all over Ventura County, reducing our use of greenhouse gases.
Anything else to
report?
Yeah, so we had a great time planting a tree at Clough Vista for Arbor Day. Replacing the pine that came down so that was really fun and thank you James and team for putting that together because that was actually really special Yeah, I went to an event at the Humane Society and learned a little bit about what Eric Knight their new executive director is doing. And his idea for re-envisioning the Humane Society and potential capital Capital campaign and so that was really exciting because it does dovetail a lot with what we in Ojai are potentially going to be thinking about as we re-envision And start thinking about the general plan in a more holistic way. He is doing the same thing with Humane Society and potentially could be a partner and or you know, we could work together to see how that could So yeah, that would be my two.
I'm there.
Okay, anything else? I'm very busy but I have nothing to report yet. Okay,
City Manager's Report.
So just quickly on May 23rd right now there are six discussion items currently scheduled. A couple are sort of like housekeeping items that are required and then the other is not so much. We have our annual engineer's report related to our assessments. It's required to be a public hearing, so that's first. We have our third budget workshop which will be CIP, Capital Improvement Projects.
We have to bring the valet parking item with the Parking Committee's recommendation back prior to a legal deadline with the ongoing litigation We have the commission composition item coming back and changing the sizes of the commissions that was directed to come back. The housing element, we'll be bringing in the revised housing element and then the mayor's request for the rent disclosure item that we pushed off this agenda. So those are the six items currently scheduled for May 23rd.
The Parks and Rec Commission made their pickleball recommendation, we're going to try to squeeze that into either the May 23 or June 13th I think with that heavy of an agenda that pickleball recommendation will come on June 13 but I just wanted to mention that because that's one we get a lot of questions about when that's coming back so those are some of the items looking ahead at the next two agendas
Thank you, James. Any future agenda items?
Yeah. I just want to ask a question, James. How is the Park and Rec Committee doing with the Soule Park contract?
So the Parks and Rec Commission, they canceled this meeting due to lack of quorum. It's the first one they've canceled in, I would say over a year so it's not typical But so that was supposed to be on their agenda for them to discuss and give an update. So I'll reach out and see if there's an update in the meantime, but essentially they canceled that meeting due to lack of quorum, so the next meeting is June.
So, I'll see if there's an update in the meantime. Okay, I think I think I I don't want to speak for them. But I think that we had sent them the Agreement that's been negotiated to date and then they were gonna get together and sort of go through that and make some
recommendations
So we can follow up on that. Yeah,
this is really important people are waiting for that and then Some kind of a date certain or Anticipate it for the cannabis lounge and perhaps an understanding that we're not going to put new items That are not time-sensitive on until we follow up with that because It just feels starts to feel very disjointed. Yeah, yeah, so no new I Mean I know that you have one item okay that
Yeah, we have that currently planned for July 11th. Which again sounds far but we only have May 23rd which we just went through that. June 13th, June 27th and then July 11th and Just a common always happens is may and June end up sort of being swallowed by the budget And so yeah, all those agenda items have budget reviews are all those meetings will have budget views So July 11th sort of has almost like the return to normal business. So that that's the date We had that penciled in right now
So what about Go ahead. Okay, and then Rachel can't meet the parking Committee was there an alternative?
There's an alternative date that Tuesday morning instead Tuesday the 16th
Tuesday
would
work because
then
that gives us exactly one week to get the agenda.
Okay next Tuesday in the morning So we have to meet before I would like
to put on
the agenda
the
indemnification for the next meeting. I should have the
answers back from various
agencies that I've contacted I expect that we'll be back. So that would be a good thing. I'm perfectly fine to push the The Finance Committee because that's absolutely fine.
We won't meet in them in the meantime, so
yeah, so that's great Yeah, thank you
And I have a question We've had we have two very experienced fundraisers Heidi Whitman and Amber Landis who's at the development director for the Humane Society of And they have very graciously volunteered to do a workshop for local nonprofits to help them apply for grants. So does that need to be an agenda item?
If there's no objection, we could... They presented at the Budget Committee meeting and my understanding was that they essentially were just saying if we let them use one of our spaces, Kent Hall, for example, so if there's no objection, yeah, we hand them the keys to Kent Hall for a couple of hours.
Yeah, I heard her speak on that. And thank you to both of them. Just for the
sake of disclosure one of those people is my wife. We know which one. And they are actually also doing one specifically for the Arts Commission just a workshop on grant applications.
It's really fantastic Thank You to Amber and Heidi All right, anything else? Yeah.
So during when we do the commission item that will include Councilmember Whitman's, are you still thinking of
I'm still requesting that we go to a system where each council member appoints a planning commissioner.
Okay, all right. Can I...I wanted to pass out one of the Planning Commissioner's resumes since he's the one under, I believe, under scrutiny?
4:53 – 4:545 turns
Is there any reason why we wouldn't have it for all commissions? I mean, it seems to me that we're saying planning but also we have many commissions. Mean and I will just say this Andy that the state looks at this they look at who you try to kick off planning commissions That's what they're gonna. Look at they're gonna say which you have said publicly. Yeah, okay Okay But I'm just saying that if we're gonna do it for one We should do it for we should do it for all commissions not just not just the Planning Commission bring back options
for the council debate at that meeting We discussed that at the last meeting and I'm open to doing all of them or just
yeah Yeah, I did. I didn't know that we had decided that we would only do planning. That was
my Things been decided All right.
Well, thank you everybody for a productive meeting Thanks for hanging in there y'all out there and hey, we had a lot of five O's so way to go