BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 August 22, 2023

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:002 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role0:00

Order, we have a quorum. Could we have the roll call please Weston?

Roll call — called by Weston Montgomery
Show transcript
Yes Mayor. Mayor Stix. Here. Mayor Pro Tem Francina. Here. Council Member Ruhl. Here Council Member Lange. Here Council Member Whitman. Here

Thank You Weston and welcome everyone to the August 22nd 2023 meeting of the Ojai City Council. Weston will you please say the pledge for us? Would

Pledge of Allegiance — led by Weston Montgomeryceremonial · click to expand
ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role0:23

everyone please stand Place your right hand over your heart. Ready, begin.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role0:43

Thank you, Wesson.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role0:44

And before we approve the agenda I just want to say a big thank you to our emergency management system. It works really effectively and of course we're all digesting the Ojai 2023 hurricane which was a surprise to everybody I would say and so let's all just take a deep breath and relax our nervous systems. And especially, I'd like to thank James Vega if you're listening, James. Because James worked so hard to bring all the entities together, all of the emergency management system to coordinate and collaborate. And James, thank you so much because it really worked well.

Shout out to Barry Parker. Thank you so much, Barry. Barry called me immediately with a report of what was happening and photographs and I just am so grateful for the participation. Mark Scott, thank you for coordinating from Fresno which was unbelievable effort Our city staff, thank you Trina. I know you are out and about and working really hard so thank you to the police department.

And also our incredible city staff. Lindy, I know you were out and about. Our public works was super busy and it was really a great example of collaboration and community and all of us caring for each other. Also, a big thank you to Peggy Lacerra for coordinating and instigating getting Kent Hall open for an unhoused population. Thank you, Sousa, for working on that. Thanks, Mark, for your encouragement. Thank you James Hahn for it's all about opening the door, bringing the key.

And also, I just wanted to say that our heart goes out to a lot of the store owners who have lost a lot of merchandise. I made the rounds yesterday and went to Minnie Westridge and OBC, Pat's Liquor. I went to Plan de Chen today, and a lot of merchandise was lost, huge cleanups. It's incredible because you go into those places, you can't even tell that anything happened.

So, it's been a great example of community coming together regardless of what happens to work for the common good. So thank you very much. Okay and at this point Mr. City Attorney do you have anything to report out from our closed session?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:07

Yes, thank you Madam Mayor. The Council met in closed session and considered one item public employee appointment and public employment under Government Code Section 54957 regarding City Manager. They considered options for the recruiter and will be making that decision having interviewed the recruiters **

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:27

Thank you very much. Okay, we'll move on to approval of the agenda. Is there a motion to approve? ** I'll move to approve. ** Second. ** I'll second it. ** All in favor? ** Aye. ** Wonderful. We will move on to our presentation this evening. It's a presentation of a proclamation honoring the life and service of Terrence Gordon Hill. So Brian Aikens who is the chair of our HPC will be making a presentation.

OK, thank you. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59

Thank you. I have my capable assistant here. I'd like to introduce, since we're going to be talking about someone very special to them, Claire Hill, who's waving her hand at you. Her daughter Kathy Schaefer, one of the two daughters she has. And grandson Jack, who when Terry received this award I reminded him of this. When Terry received this award, Jack was in his full scout regalia. He is a Eagle Scout and he is the one that snuck up and handed Terry his notes. That's so nice! So I solicited his help so we can hold up the annual award that Terry received.

Thank you, Jack. My name is Brian Akins. I'm the current chair of the City of Ojai Historic Preservation Commission. I first met Terry when our good friend David Mason, who I knew from serving together on the Ojai Valley Museum Board of Trustees together with Claire Hill said if you want to learn Ojai history attend our Historic Preservation Commission meetings and so I did being enthralled by stories being shared by Ojai's longtime luminaries Wonderful, dedicated folks like David Mason who was the 2010 HPC Lifetime Achievement Award. Terry Hill and Craig Walker who were the 2018 Lifetime Achievement Award winners. I'm naming these individuals because they were on the HPC also. Rose Boggs and Patricia Clark Donner who are the 2019 Lifetime Achievement award winners.

These are the luminaries that worked so very hard most for decades to protect and promote our lovely and historical city of Ojai. We're so grateful for their efforts. Hearing these names, one can understand why any lover of Ojai history would come to listen to them. Terry was the third to receive this award after David in 2010 and Julie Tumamait Stensley in 2015.

Looking for something to share specific to Terry I went back and looked at the write-up. I submitted to the HPC in July 2018 Which was then forwarded to the council just support the nomination of Commissioner Gina McCattin For Terry to receive this lifetime award, and here's what I submitted. I spoke with Claire Hill Q Kleenex She said it had been a hard last six months for Terry health-wise.

Per Claire, hearing about being nominated to a lifetime recognition will have Terry up and doing cartwheels down the hall. You can picture that right Jack? Terry was on the Historic Preservation Commission for 22 to 23 years, at that time actually 23. He originally got on the HPC when Claris Prince bought the time Joe DeVito said I know something Terry can do get involved with the HPC or whatever it was called at that time Terry has always been a history buff. When he taught at Villanova, he taught history, Spanish and biology. His love for history began with learning about Contra Costa County when he attended St. Mary's. Once they relocated to Ojai, he learned all he could about our own valley.

I rewatched the presentation made by Mayor Johnston to Terry the night of November 27th, 2018. I just wanted to relay that Mayor Johnston, this one's for you Councilman Whitman. I just wanted to relay that Mayor Johnston commented on the many seasons he and Terry co-chaired swim meets over at the Nordhoff High School. I know that has special significance for Councilman Whitman and also for Kathy Schaffer over there she said.

Additionally, Craig Walker left some words that he'd like me to share for him. He is currently out of state on a family matter where they don't have Wi-Fi. Somewhere on earth they don't have Wi-fi. If I was in the Tetons, I'd understand. This is from Craig. I first met Terry when I joined the Historic Preservation Commission in 2012. Terry was already a senior member of the commission and clearly respected by all. Terry welcomed me with a smile and immediately took me under his wing. One of my first committee appointments was serving with Terry on the Commission's Heritage Tree Committee. Our job was to compile lists of cities' heritage trees. We spent several afternoons driving around Ojai with the preliminary list, getting out of the car and measuring trunks and branches.

Sounds like a blast. We quickly became friends, we shared a lot in common because we were both retired teachers and both had a passion for Ojai history. Another HPC project that year remember 2012 was developing a list of historic structures of merit which we are now updating for the council. Terry's knowledge of Ojai history and architecture were truly amazing Also serving on our committee were David Mason and Rose Box. As you can imagine, I learned a lot about Ojai and its buildings while working on that project. Terry and Claire Hill often opened their home for retreats by our commission and social gatherings for the Ojai Valley Museum.

Have you seen his Stein collection? That's all I got to ask you, to know if you've ever been there. Whenever I had a question, I knew I could stop by Terry's house for direction or information. Even after Terry retired from the commission he always made himself available to assist local history projects. He was a valuable resource when Elise DuPoit and I revised and updated Patty Frye's Ojai History Park.

Ojai will miss Terry, both as a local historian and as an amazing human being. He has done so much to preserve Ojai history for future generations and to keep that history alive in our buildings and public spaces. Personally, I'll always consider Terry to be my mentor and friend and a true hands-on local historian Thank You City Council for recognizing and honoring this remarkable Remarkable man who gave so much to our community. And that is from Craig Walker. Thank you Jack Jack can verify the Bear Steins Did you check out the wiring job that your grandma did?

Oh good, okay

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7710:10

So that's the I was going to say. Yeah, she's trying to be so yeah, so Councilman Whitman thanks. I'm really honored to be able to say a few words about someone I've known since I was a child I easily get choked up with these kind of things, so bear with me. So I moved to Hawaii when I was nine and Terry was one of the first adults I met.

0:10 – 0:181 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7710:44

He was a swim team dad and I swam with his daughters Kathy and Jen. He was kinda the ringleader at the swim team parents. Once a year we held a swim meet At the Nordoff pool that brought swimmers from all over the county and Terry did everything he could To pull those swim meets off He seeded the heats He typed the heat sheets You work the snack bar He organized the timers and he timed himself.

If there was anything else that needed, Terry was the first one to volunteer. When we traveled to other communities for swim meets, Terry wasn't just there. He was engaged with everybody. He was the first one to run over and look at the sheets when they posted the times And he always had a great word for a kid who had a good time drop. He was also just as likely to take a shift as a timer or snack bar at the other swim meet sites.

My dad was a history nut like Terry and they were great friends, and my dad had a job that gave him access to Dodger tickets a few times a year My dad made a special point of getting Pittsburgh Pirate tickets so that he could get Terry to go with him. And I never asked Terry back then what his connection was with the pirates, but I became curious when I read his history recently and he'd spent his whole life in California and there was no connection to Pennsylvania or Pittsburgh.

So I asked Claire and Claire told me that growing up in California, there were no major league baseball teams when he was a kid and so he was a Hollywood stars fan And the Hollywood stars were the farm club for the Pittsburgh Pirates, and so when the players would graduate up to the major leagues, Terry would follow them. Looking into that a little further, That arrangement ended in the 50s, and my dad was taking Terry to baseball games in the 70s, 80s and 90s.

And it made me think about the fact that Terry maintained his devotion to the Pirates as a testament to his loyalty and his commitment to tradition. So 20 years ago, I was serving on planning and I remember we held a joint session with Historic Preservation. No idea what the reason was for that joint session but it was really kind of mind-boggling for me to be there serving on this dais with this person who I had looked up to for so long And it was also kind of mind-boggling that he was treating me as a peer instead of the little kid that swam with his daughters.

So, in preparing to honor Terry tonight I was thinking back to when I moved here in 1969 and in addition to Terry there were a few other Adults that made a big impression on me, I'll name a few of them. Larry Hartman, Ed Titus, John Wilson. Along with Terry these were people who gave tirelessly to OI. I definitely know that there were others equally worthy of mention But as a nine-year-old, that's kind of who I remembered. And I know that there were a lot of men and women making a difference in our community that I'm not mentioning here. My father is even one of those.

So it strikes me when I look back at the parents of my contemporaries growing up in OI that it was just in their DNA that they would give to their community. It wasn't something they wanted recognition for, it was just what they did. Sorry. I think it's good that we pause every once in a while and look back and talk about these people who got our community to where we are So I'll close with this.

I was at a speaking engagement recently and the speaker was asked what he recommended for members of the community that felt lost about how to contribute to a better future, and his recommendation was that each of us find the thing that we love or are good at and make contributions through whatever that is. If you're good at organizing, then help organize. If you're good at writing, then write.

And if you're good at raising money, raise money but do something you connect with. So Terry loved history And he gave back to the community through that thing that he loved. So, I can't speak enough words to say how grateful I am to people like Terry Hill who gave more than their fair share to our community and I extend that gratitude to all our past and current commissioners.

And I also suggest to anybody, any members of our community listening that if you can see yourself serving the community whether it's on a commission or in a community service organization or any other way the community needs you And our future generations need you. Thanks.

0:18 – 0:235 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role18:24

Thank you, Andy. That was beautiful and what an honor it is to be here to celebrate a coach and teacher. And thank you Brian for your kind words. Come on up Jack. It's fun up here. You can hold the proclamation with me. I never met Terry, it's just so beautiful to learn about Terry's life and I Claire Kathy and Jack. Thank you so much for being here to help celebrate this day And I loved Andy what you said, it's just in your DNA So figure out what you love and help out and what a beautiful model of service and dedication To our community in 23 years on a commission that's impressive Proclamation honoring Terrence Gordon Hill Whereas, the City of Ojai and the broader community lost a valued member and leader on May 20th, 2023 with the death of Terrence Terry Hill.

Whereas, Terry Hill served for more than twenty years on the Ojai Historic Preservation Commission. Whereas, Terry Hill was a tireless and outspoken advocate for the importance of our community's historical heritage. Whereas Terry Hill dedicated his career to the education of our youth. Whereas Terry inspired and informed countless community members concerning the history of Ojai.

Whereas, Terry served the Ojai Historic Preservation Commission with distinction. Whereas Terry was a tireless supporter of the, oops I already said that sorry. Whereas Terry's sense of humor, kindness and willingness to give his time enriched those fortunate enough to have known and worked with him. Whereas his true legacy lies in his love of knowledge and history, and his example in the giving of himself for a better community.

Now therefore be it proclaimed the city of Ojai on behalf of its residents recognizes the significant contributions of Terrence Gordon Hill over the course of his distinguished service to the community and mourns his death. Now, therefore be it further proclaimed that I, Betsy Sticks, Mayor of the City of Ojai and on behalf of the Ojai City Council do extend its sincerest condolences to his wife Claire Hill and his daughters Catherine Hill and Jennifer Hill Ottermatt and his son-in-laws Luke Schaefer and Kyle Ottermatt and his five grandchildren Kendall J. Ottermatt, Ian J. Ottermatt, Jack are Schaefer, Molly C. Schaefer and Peter G. Schaeffer. Thank you very much.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role21:25

And for those in the audience and watching our live broadcast

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:28

I'm going to just say a quick, very heartfelt thank you. Otherwise, I'll have to pull the Kleenex out of my pocket. But I do want to add something to make you smile. Sunday was our 63rd wedding anniversary and we had an earthquake. And I called the girls and I said, your dad was afraid that I was going to forget that day. And I'm sure he talked to the good Lord and said do something to remind her that's a special day. So I know how thrilled he is with this.

I'm just praying his sense of humor doesn't carry through to tonight showing his happiness from it. Thank you so much. We are both... Both Terry and I were from out of town, but we moved here in 1960 and we have been feeling like we were born and raised here. We love it. Thank you. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed22:26

you Claire.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role22:30

We will take a brief pause for a photo opportunity. If you can't see the camera, I can't see you. Mayor Pro Tem, scoot over so you can see the camera. Got the shot?

0:23 – 0:297 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8823:37

That was really nice. Really nice. I think Claire taught kindergarten, right? Yeah.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role24:06

Thank you very much. All right, we'll move on to commission reports. No commission reports I believe so we will move on to public communication and just a reminder that these are items not on the agenda and because they're not on the agenda we cannot discuss them We appreciate your viewpoint and participation, and we can agendize them in the future. Public comments are three minutes. At the end of the three minutes you'll hear a chime, and please respect each other's time, and in the spirit of equity stop talking when the chime sounds.

No giving away time to a speaker. And if you're in agreement with the previous person, please just say ditto. A couple of suggestions I've received from the community. People have asked if you could say your name. Of course, you don't have to. Say your name and say your address if you would like to. Or the City of Residence. The City of Residence, and there was also a request if you could address the Council rather than the audience that would be helpful.

Okay so we will... Can I make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed25:06

one? Yeah

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role25:07

sure!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed25:07

Just in case anybody's here to talk about the item H on the consent calendar we're gonna end up asking the council to pull that and discuss it because we've discovered a challenge on the funding end of that that we need to have the council I just thought I would mention that in case somebody was here tonight to discuss that.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role25:29

Thank you all right we have one public comment Barbie Kafka who will be using an interpreter

CommentPauline KafkaProposedself-stated25:52

Hello, my name is Pauline Kafka. You may have not seen me before. Tell me because I understand you. Can you all understand her? Yes, yes. Okay. To speak at the City Hall meeting, I am rather excited to be doing this because I'm here for a purpose. I just want to encourage the Ojai people to unite so that we can make Ojai a much better city and you never know if we have the success A lot of things are changing, especially for the housing and the home. But I know that we can do it.

But it takes a lot of courage, compassion, and love to do it, and just to move the politics forward. You know, this is what our country is going through right now. So I'm just having This is what happens for Ojai, especially for the community college. It's a beautiful place but I think there are things that can be improved to make it much better because it's so nice to work here.

I see the beauty of the flowers. The one thing that has been bad over here is the tents. I'm Our climate change is changing. That's another reason why we have to point out those things that need to be improved, but I don't think so. to be successful and show the world that they can do it too. This is why I'm here, to encourage all of you if we could put our hands together and work on this. This is my vision.

And I think it would be wonderful if this happened but this is just the beginning to what I wanted You may not know, but there's been a lot of things happening because I thought they needed to be improved. Like the hose that I had to use was cut off and I couldn't use it. So there are just a lot of things we need to talk about maybe next time we could talk about this. But I want to thank you for allowing me to speak here Thank you, Barbie. Thank you.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:30 – 0:4039 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role30:19

Thank you. Do

CommentPauline KafkaProposedself-stated30:20

we have any questions or anything?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role30:24

We're actually not supposed to ask questions at this point, but we can agendize things for the future.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:32

Can I ask who are you? Can you tell me who you are?

CommentDale HansonProposed · by introduction30:39

I'm the interpreter.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role30:40

An interpreter. The

CommentDale HansonProposed · by introduction30:41

interpreter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:41

You're the

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role30:42

interpreter. ASL interpreter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:43

Yeah, yeah. But what is your name? Oh, Rell McDonough. Ralph.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role30:51

I can speak to that. Ralph McDonough? This is an accommodation for a ADA request.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role30:55

Yes,

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role30:56

OK

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role30:57

thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for being here. Appreciate it. Any, thank you. Thanks Barbie nice to see you. Any public comments on Zoom Weston?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role31:10

No raised, yes we have one raised hand now and I'll say to our many Zoom attendees tonight this is the time to raise your hand for general public comment. First we'll have Larry Steingold. Larry you have the floor?

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction31:23

Yes sorry um because we are talking about affordable housing and the city and roads i would like you all to propose SB 649 to give Ohioans preference Just like the state has authorized us to. Also, when you are put in 25 mile an hour speed limits, you should also plan ahead for speed bumps because as the roads get nicer, the speeds are going to get faster. So please try to think ahead of the curve.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role31:58

Thank you. Thank you Larry.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role32:01

No more raised hands Mayor.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role32:02

All right. Thank you, Weston. We will move on to the consent calendar and we are going to pull H. Yeah. OK. All right let's discuss that. We don't need to. We don't need to discuss it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed32:17

OK you

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role32:17

want

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed32:19

to adopt the rest of it or

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role32:20

sure is there a motion to approve the rest of it?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:22

I'll make a motion. I'll move to approve the rest of the consent calendar.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7732:26

Second.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role32:27

All in favor? Aye. Let's look at item number H, which is the consideration of an agreement with Ojai Valley Land Conservancy to reimburse the conservancy to Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed32:42

and we're really sorry to be pulling this tonight. We thank the Ojai Valley Land Conservancy for working with the city. This relates to the ATP project And the potential for creating a public parking lot and pedestrian bridge that was an accommodation for the fact that parking was being removed. The Conservancy was also going to be making changes to two hiking trails that are associated with the preserve there, and so it is a good project. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the concept of the project. The problem we've got is that in looking at the funding source, we hadn't realized that the ATP project which has been listed in previous staff reports As funding was apparently more of a generic reference to the project funding and then the actual grant.

And where we found today, and this is a last minute discovery so I don't foreclose the possibility we're going to find other ways around this but We found today that the grant application doesn't include this project, and it's far past the date at which we can change the scope of the grant. These grants are pretty much locked in the way they're approved and we cannot use this funding for that purpose.

So we are back to, you know, took a step backwards and said well this is $300,000. What else could the city come up with for $300,000 to cover this cost? That's a lot for our budget. And we do not have an answer for the council tonight. My initial thought was you could approve the project agreement with the proviso that we have to find the funding, but the trouble is the grant or the agreement actually calls out the amount.

And it's conceivable that the solution to this may require a change in the scope of the project where that number is wrong. So rather than do that, we're suggesting you pull it off tonight and send us back to work with thank-yous to the Conservancy for hanging in there with us and seeing if we can't find some other way around being able to deal with this project.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role35:26

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed35:26

mark Sousa so we can expect that this will come back as a future agenda item I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed35:32

We'll bring it back because we'll need to report to you what has happened. I can't tell you right now where we find $300,000 but we will come back and tell you what options were able to identify. I mean, we could use Measure C. You could use Measure C money for this. The trouble is there's lots of uses for Measure C money that the city has identified And right now from a cash flow basis that really isn't available to us.

Not that we would need it immediately, this is a reimbursement agreement so we wouldn't need the money immediately, we would need it over time. But we need a little bit of time to work through this and be able to come back and give you the real options.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed36:20

Can I ask another question? If we need to, can we separate the parking lot from the pedestrian bridge and the two hiking trails. And there's a number of reasons why I asked that because I was looking again at the—I hope they don't hear me say this—the church parking lot and of course the future is shared parking That is a huge parking lot and there's at least 20, at least maybe 50 parking spots right at the border of the Meadows Preserve.

And you know some ways there's maybe another way around this that I hope staff could look into

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed37:04

I think all of those creative approaches require us to take a look at them. I'm a big believer in shared parking, so we'll take a look at what those other alternatives might be but we need to take the time to do that right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed37:21

Yeah. So do you need anything from us besides

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed37:25

pulling it? I think there may be people here who want to speak to it, and certainly if there's an... And I'm sorry, I don't know the people but I'm new. If there's people from the Conservancy here that I should already know, I apologize, but we wanna thank them for what they've done working with us so far, and perhaps they have comments they wanna make.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role37:47

Yeah. Thank you, Mr. City Manager. I don't want to put anyone on the spot but does the land concern see Tom Maloney would you like to say anything? Thank you for your patience and understanding. And thank you to staff for looking into this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed38:02

Yeah, I mean this was a shock we do have just give a more fuller picture of the project It's long been contemplated to make the Meadows 365 day a year access. You know Phil Moncharge is on our board he's on the school board there's talk of repurposing Miners Oaks Elementary that puts further emphasis on this bridge project when Greg came to us about the parking because I parked along Maricopa Highway for the parade on the 4th of July and you really feel like you're taking your life in your hands when you step into the road or the highway. So we really want to do this project, and of course my phone starts ringing.

I think at this time of year, you know, Mark, you've more experience than I do. There's often federal transportation enhancement money kicking around so I'm in communication with Supervisor LeVere's office and I think perhaps Steve Bennett or Monique Lamone might come in and be able to help us with some of this if there's some leftover federal money coming up to September end of the federal fiscal year. So we're going to keep beating the bushes but we've raised about $250,000 for the bridge project and the trail enhancements. The Lions Club is going to do the improvement of the trail from Lomita across to the existing bridge getting it set. We are already under contract for the bridge project and we think this parking area makes a lot of sense.

So, we'll just keep plugging away and we'll find a way to either maybe there's another ATP kind of grant here that they need to get out the door too. You know? Because a lot of times the state and federal agencies need to spend the money as well. So

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role39:45

thanks. Thank you Tom. And thanks for your patience. I appreciate it in all that you do. Stay safe. Parking is important. Any comments online, Winston? Yes.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role39:57

We have one raised hand and for those on Zoom this is on pulled consent calendar item H1H. Larry Steingold you have the floor.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction40:07

I thought about point of order. I thought public speaking was for public speaking and then there would be another opportunity to speak on a consent item. Well I was going to speak on the agreement with the county. Is that too late to speak on?

0:40 – 0:4727 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:23

But after we vote on this item.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role40:26

Mr. Stangl, we can take that comment from the consent calendar. Please proceed.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction40:31

Oh, OK. Thank you. I spent 40 years in commercial real estate and it's a lease or a pop-up lease or an agreement. And while the discussion items talk about food and custodial care and what have you, it leaves silent who will pay for the food? Who will pay for sanitary services Okay, it talks about custodial services in the term sheet but not... It doesn't talk about sanitation services in the term sheet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed41:06

What

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction41:06

item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed41:07

is this?

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction41:09

G.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed41:10

G.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction41:11

I'm just saying is the lease needs to be tightened up. It puts a lot of emphasis on us and we have very little money, very few employees And on the term sheet, costs associated with custodial services, food service personnel and supplies. It's silent on new food, sanitary services which means plumbers, porta-potties or what have you. It also is very silent on police services. If you have 150, 200 people standing at Sarzadi and camping out our one officer who we're paying for is not going to be sufficient to take care of the crowd and Um, the city and I know we're supposed to coordinate with the county but it doesn't say who will pay for police services.

So I would think that if we could go over that term sheet which i'm more than happy to help with um It's very important that we tighten it up because the city manager is going to come and go in this agreement's going to be around a long time And it's a good thing. We really do need the county to step up because we're a hobby town for a lot of tourists, and we don't have the money to be on the hook for this stuff. So I think we should be more responsible and have them pick up the tab or at least have it in writing for police services, new food, new sanitary services, new custodial what-have-you. So please review it more carefully, I would hope.

Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role42:50

Thank you, Larry.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role42:51

No more raised hands on Zoom, Mayor.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role42:53

OK. Thank you very much. All right. We will move on to the public. I have a comment. Oh, OK. Mr. Miley? This is on H, correct? Yes.

CommentBill NileyProposedself-stated43:04

Hello. This is about H. If the ATP budget could afford $300K for a parking lot and a bridge, and now it's been pulled back And if there's any city money in ATP that matches the $300,000, it would seem that we would have $300,000 that we don't spend from our budget because we now have $300 thousand back. So maybe that could go. Anyway, thanks.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role43:40

Thank you Bill. All right that now we will move on to the public hearing item number oh okay thank you thank you Mr. City Attorney. Okay do we have a motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed43:52

I'll make a motion to approve the consent calendar with the exception of H. We approved the consent calendar.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed43:57

Yeah, that was done so it would be perhaps some motion to direct staff to negotiate further on the OVLC agreement? Yes. So

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.7744:07

I'll make a motion that we direct staff investigate the different avenues of getting to an agreement with OVLSC, Hawaii Valley Land Conservancy over the agreement related to the parking lot and improvements on the Meadows Preserve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed44:32

Second. Can we have a friendly amendment that if all else fails, that there also be a discussion with whoever owns the church parking lot?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed44:45

We can include that. OK.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed44:47

All

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role44:47

in favor? Thank you. Now we will move on to the public hearing, item number two, introduction of an ordinance regulating...

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8844:59

Wait, did we approve the rest of the consent? We did.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed45:02

Yes. And Madam Mayor, if staff could add one word. On the question raised by Mr. Steingold, section 10 of the agreement does provide for reimbursement requests by the city to the county From the county to reimburse certain costs including cost associated with custodial services, food service personnel and supplies if those costs would not have been occurred but for this shelter usage of the facility. So the details will be determined in the event of a disaster but there is some provision for reimbursement requests from the county to the city and that's on page 1-7 thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role45:33

Okay, now we will finally move on to the public hearing number two. Introduction of an ordinance regulating cannabis lounges and cannabis dispensaries. Mr. City Attorney do we have a staff report? I mean I'm sorry, Mr. City Manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed45:48

I will do my best. And Brian Popovich has come up and he's the real expert on this, so we'll punt to him at a certain point. As the City Council knows, this item has been before the council and was directed to come back with an ordinance change to address two particular issues One is the opening or the allowance for up to three cannabis consumption lounges.

There's very specific conditions associated with that, if you need to go over those Brian can do that. And also there's a slight change to the area of the city that is allowable for use For these uses to exist and again They can be defined specifically if if the council needs By Brian, is there you have a map for that brand?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed46:53

Yes, it was attachment B

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed46:56

There we go. So that shows, well maybe you can describe the areas of the city that are expanded to allow these uses?

0:47 – 0:5524 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed47:09

So the consumption lounges would be allowed in the purple one, which is the M1 MPD zone and then the C1 zone east of Park Road. The green encompasses where the dispensaries would be allowed, which would be the existing M1MPD zones, then the C-1 general commercial, which does exclude the 1.5 FR overlay, which is the downtown district. So that would be excluded from dispensaries.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed47:39

So in general, these are not dramatic changes but there is change and it does open the door so to speak for cannabis lounges. And that's what I can tell you about it off the top and if you've got questions we can answer.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role47:57

Okay, any questions and just a reminder to council these are questions so if you could just keep your question short and Do let's do our best not to veer off into discussion because that comes after the public comment And if you can remember to bring it through the chair, that'd be great becomes mayor pretend Rancina

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed48:16

So but what you just stated Brian is That's a proposal that hasn't been voted on, correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed48:23

It's what's in front of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed48:24

you. Yeah. So if we wanted to add, for example, South Fulton or if someone wanted to expand into the former Suzanne's building, that's been suggested that if the council considers it and agrees, we can still expand the commercial zone. Is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:45

Yeah, the council can adjust where cannabis dispensaries and or lounges would be allowed. That's that's tonight's item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed48:52

Yeah yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:53

What was presented is what is presented to you now is what the council recommended last time we brought forward in a formal ordinance but it's still up to the council to adjust if desired

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:03

OK, thank you. That's what I thought. I just want to make

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role49:04

sure. OK. Council Member Lange?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8849:07

Yes. So I had a question regarding the sale of food non-cannabis or non-hemp related food items. So the ordinance doesn't specify it doesn't prohibit them but does that preclude a cannabis lounge from being able to sell Food items or non-alcoholic beverage items.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:39

As drafted, that is not prohibited. But that could be expressly stated. The only expressed prohibition is that customers are not permitted to bring their own cannabis or food or alcohol or tobacco. Lounges must provide free water and on sale of food and food items infused with cannabis as permitted. So the food there is clarified but you could add food and non-alcoholic beverages.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8850:07

Right, thanks. It's my recollection that when we spoke about this at a previous meeting that we expressly said that we wanted to include that allowance.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role50:21

Any other questions from Council? It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed50:26

my understanding that we're going to go through the draft ordinance. I have a lot of questions about the actual ordinance, similar to Rachel, but we can do that after the public comment, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:38

Yeah, that'd be fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed50:39

Okay, thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role50:40

All right, we will go ahead and open the public hearing. First we have Bill Miley then William Wyrick and then Ted Moore.

CommentBill NileyProposedself-stated50:59

Hello, good evening. My name is Bill Niley. I have a credential which most people don't have. As a public health educator manager for the Ventura County Public Health Department from 1969 to 1975, I helped develop the alcohol and drug program. From 1972 to 1975, I was its director I fully support C1 zoning for dispensaries and lounges. It's time for the full fairness and equity from medical and recreational cannabis.

Some will object for historical reasons, which have been proven not true. Lounge hours should match alcohol on sale hours. Folks need evening time to socialize and relax in a public place, and also to learn more about responsible use. Lounges should be allowed to have full restaurant license similar to alcohol serving restaurants The food softens the direct effects.

It's like wine with dinner, snacks with beer, food with drinks. I support lounges. I have supported lounges from the very beginning and I surely support them now. Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role52:32

Thank you Bill. Next we have William Wyrick then Ted Moore then Michelle Rosenblum

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed52:39

I really love that hopefully we're poised to take another step on the de-stigmatization of a somewhat sordid history of cannabis regulation and legal consequences for people who really didn't deserve what was done to them for many decades. So I really appreciate the step that I think we're about to take here, and I want to make a couple points. My only credential is economics PhD, and the reason I bring that up is that I want to add the additional important reason, and that is to allow movement Out of this manufacturing plan district into commercial zone because that opens up economic opportunity. I have people all the time literally asking me, I have a startup business but where do I locate?

Everything's full in the Bryant addition, and we're using valuable startup space for cannabis retailing. We did it for a reason at the time, but I think the time to evolve into the commercial zone however this council designates appropriately makes a whole lot of sense The purpose of encouraging local businesses and local startups in that short supply area as well as the overall de-stigmatization effort.

A couple other comments, I suggest that you do keep tying the dispensary to the lounge because morphing to six locations might defeat the purpose I just mentioned. We want...I think we might wanna try to incentivize Moving that retail into a retail area and not tying up those startup semi-industrial locations for entrepreneurial activity for local people are looking for business locations.

I also don't quite understand the 8 a.m. to 7 p.m time, I mean 10 to 9 get people coming home from work a little more time you know it's not even dark at seven still 11 hours so I suggest that 10 a. m. to 9 p. m rather than an 8 a m to 7 pm and If you're talking about a safety plan, understand the purpose of that. But have to be careful to stipulate it in a way that makes sense that the operators can handle what that means exactly in terms of handling the customer environment in a way that is reasonable and not so prone to litigious potential that we end up defeating our purpose here. So thank you very much.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role55:30

Thank you, Bill. Next, we have Ted Moore then Michelle Rosenblum then Chelsea Satula.

CommentTed MooreProposedself-stated55:37

Good evening. I'm Ted Moore. I have a handout. Can I just go ahead and do it myself? Just an aerial photograph of just kind of that area. OK, let me do that for you because I want to refer to it

0:55 – 1:0812 turns

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role55:53

Yes, and this material on the dais will be available in the clerk's office tomorrow.

CommentTed MooreProposedself-stated56:17

I have a little different perspective that I wanted to give you. My background, first I've lived here just to give you briefly, I've lived here for 34 years. I've been developing commercial real estate for 40 some odd years. The only thing I've ever done here in Ojai is the little eight building office park on Bryant Circle which I sold a long time ago. David Burry was the architect many years ago on that project.

So I'm really representing, kind of riding a couple of horses if you will in this situation. I'm working with a group, it's a large funding opportunity to help the American Legion Hall. Okay? And its property and what you see there is an aerial properties I just want to reference and give you some input and thoughts on. It includes the American Legion property, it also includes property owned by a guy named Bob Walk who was a long time friend of mine.

And by putting the boundary line at Park Road, it's kind of similar to what has been set up here just recently. is you're cutting off really any viable sites, in my view, for the lounges. I'm glad to see that. I wasn't quite clear on the dispensaries if you put them along that section they still would fit. But the point I'm trying to make is that you cut away viable sites. There aren't many really. And I know commercial properties really well in this community.

And I am working with, let me just go back to the American Legion Hall folks. Let me check my time. I'm helping them figure out a way to... It's part of a much bigger project, it's like 100 of them, the people I'm working with throughout Southern California. They basically just barely break even. So this would be a way for them to redo their project, and the walk property would like be included they're interested in developing too. We're just at the very beginning so there's nothing really set in stone.

But the point I'm trying to make is dispensaries and lounges can afford to pay the rent for new construction when you redevelop that area. There are very few tenants that can do it these days. And I'm very intimately familiar with this. Maybe a restaurant, but that's why I would like to see it open for both the lounges as well as the dispensary. So anyway those are my thoughts.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role58:50

Thank you Ted. Next we have Michelle Rosenblum and then Chelsea Satula

CommentChelsea SatulaProposed · by introduction59:03

Good evening everyone First, I just want to say we made it this far. It's been a long journey and there are some new faces along this journey but here we are and the ordinance put forth is an awesome step in a direction that we've been needing to go in for a long time not just the city but the county and the state and the rest of the states and this plant deserves to be normalized And as much, why I'm up here though is as much progress has this ordinance does make and we may say you know what? This was already a lot. We're giving them and you know baby steps and all these things.

And these aren't baby steps. I don't want to play them down at all but it when I compare it as a non-alcohol drinker You know when I compare this plant to alcohol and what we're proposing here, it still falls short of normalization compared to alcohol, which we just know has been proven over and over again to be a much worse problem but We're adults, right? And we're here making adult decisions and trying to do it in a safe manner with regulations amongst our fellow citizens. You know, we're not black market, you know.

People are getting away with all kinds of things now and I'm not trying to bust anybody or anything but it's like this stuff is all over the place and here's some good players that are trying to do it the right way and work with you guys So I have two points here that I want to make on the current ordinance and one is the part on proposing that it's indoor only.

Personally, I'd like to see a patio space or some open air space that I personally feel like would be beneficial to have combustion outside If that's not doable, then at least consider vaping which is much more feasible and doesn't produce the odors that people complain about. And also at the very least like the beverages and the edibles like why not have a drink outside? You know, who's getting bothered there? And if I'm coming up visiting Ojai or I'm a tourist here or whatever like you can have drinks of alcohol outside all the time. Why not drink a cannabis and consider the vaping? The other point that we've already heard is the hours.

Why shouldn't it be the same as bars? We're here as adults and I feel like 7 p.m., that's like curfew for a naughty teenager, and that's not what we're here doing. This is about giving adults respect to make choices that are alternatives to alcohol, to socialize. Thank you for your time and consideration.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:02:01

Michelle, can I ask you a question? Absolutely. Of the lounges that you know of that exist in the world today do most of them have an outdoor space?

CommentChelsea SatulaProposed · by introduction1:02:13

It's very different based on different cities and so I have seen some smaller cities mainly in Northern California where they did have outside seating and inside they had more wellness activities where they were doing like massage and body work with There's lots of really imaginative ways to do this, but for smoking it's like you don't smoke in here. I don't smoke in my house.

You know? Like I go in the backyard where all my neighbors are in the residential area legally every day So, why can't I go to a safe space and do it? And maybe a location directly next to residential areas may be not the best idea or whatever. But we're talking about a very small amount of plant material compared to like burning logs in a barbecue or a meat smoker or a grill or your fireplace. These aren't billowing clouds of smoke that would cost a fortune.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:03:16

Thank you very much. Council Member Lange?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:03:19

One other question too, do you know of like if for outdoor spaces are there smoke remediation or smoke ventilation options that could contain some of the smoke within a space?

CommentChelsea SatulaProposed · by introduction1:03:36

I think that's a good question, and I'd want to consult with experts more on this. But what I've kind of seen other than the ones that are just blatantly outside is like sort of a mix, like define outside, right? Like if you have a courtyard kind of—and again we're talking—this becomes a real estate problem next, right? But in theory for just writing ordinance here Again, define outside. Like if you have like a hangar kind of area or like a big open door or an open wall and then there's also kinda like ventilations that'll make it so that the air is always sucking inwards. And so even if there is an open space or an open ceiling, there is always air going a particular direction. So we're like... Even in the regular ones, even the indoor ones when they open up, the air is always sucking in right?

You know, I'm not an expert on the technology and how big of a space that allows for but excuse me. The other consideration is like doing it on a rooftop for example has very different airflow than like walls and surroundings and so if it's up higher it could go up higher. But yeah, if you're just outside that the smoke is going to go in there how it goes. Thank you, Michelle. Maybe another expert can speak to that. I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:05:00

appreciate that. Thank you. Chelsea Sutula?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:05:05

Thank you, Council. So good to be here. We're just making great progress. It's great. Got Bill Miley here, MPH in support. I know the Chamber is in support too. I think this is—I'm just really happy to be here. Thank you. Yeah, I do think there are outdoor air control things and that wouldn't be an issue There's definitely ways to monitor nuisance, which is, is anybody complaining? If anybody's complaining then it's a problem and you shut it down. If no one's complaining nobody notices I'm the same as Michelle. I blow my smoke out the window. I don't want it in my house. Nobody wants that. Do my neighbors complain? No!

They haven't said a thing, I don't know. Anyway, the only three things that I would like to address about this particular ordinance, I think, I could be wrong, I think we decided before with the original ordinance to leave things like the hours of operation out and leave those up to city manager discretion so it wasn't this big issue every time we wanted to adjust hours.

I do think that closing at seven is not feasible for a lounge. I would love to push the boundary to South Fulton if we're considering a hard boundary Just that one extra block. I have pictures of what it looks like on one side of the street versus the other side of the street, which is the new real estate Berkshire Hathaway whatever and then Westridge. I would love to be in the old VFW building and support them and make that work. That's set back from the street. It's got amazing parking.

That would be a lovely location. I'm open to all ideas. I don't have a concrete thing in mind right now of what I want or plan to do, it's entirely up to what the city is going to allow. I'm not gonna invest a bunch of money sitting and waiting and hoping. That's not my MO. It's gonna be when the city decides okay then that's when we'll start making plans. We've got all kinds of ideas and I've heard that bingo night for seniors is the most popular thing in Palm Springs so Yes, yes that is a very popular thing and you don't have to be senior to love bingo I'm sorry. The only the only other thing in the ordinance co location is a little vague to me, I appreciate as an, I don't personally want to be dissociated physically from a lounge.

But I need a lot of space, I have 3200 square feet where I am now and I can't fit a lounge in there. So if the option to move to commercial zone is like well now you gotta have two parcels and they're smaller but they're like a block apart I'd make that work. Maybe, I'd have to run some numbers and maybe it would work and maybe it wouldn't but it would be an option.

And that's all really the main thing I'm asking for is just some flexibility in options because real estate is so constrained and because our town is so tiny And right now, if we stay where we are, we're going to be next to residences very soon. So it's like no place is perfect but we're not going to be a nuisance and thank you for your consideration. Thank you Chelsea.

Next

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:08:09

we have one more public comment right there. Jeff Kroll? Is that right? Jeff Kroll? Thank you.

1:08 – 1:136 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:08:20

Sorry I'm late. Hello staff and council and everything, had to get my arm out of the mouth of a dog. Yeah, I had to go to ER. First off, I want to remind everyone that 70% of the population in Ojai voted for cannabis access. Of course, you granted us cannabis access. We've been in existence four to five years now. Has there been any problems? No. Have we had to address any problems or modify the ordinance?

No So I think we collectively, the three of us would at least like to have the option We know that real estate is short, but I also don't think that the mindset of developing the east end of Ojai is very practical for anybody because they're just not that much in the way of commercial buildings. But there is Vaughan Shopping Center. There are some other areas.

that we could consider, but the arcade of course has already been implied that it's not a possibility. I want to also remind you that states did not grant permission when they joined the Federal Union to give away their rights of health and safety and many, many cities have bit the bullet and gone against federal regulation in order to make their cities and their counties safer.

Unfortunately, about two-thirds of the locations in California are still holding out and being in a moratorium phase. So with that said we really need to think about health and safety when you make this decision. So is it safe now? Is someone going to consume cannabis if they use cannabis in a safe environment? Tell me where that is. In a person's home, of course.

In their car, no. Is it safe to have an edible infused type Mantra of a lounge, in my opinion that is not safe. I do think that smoking or vaporizing is certainly a more controllable very similar to alcohol and you know when you can stop and when you can cut out the edible solution is really and that may be the way a lounge could be profitable In the state guidelines, we're not allowed to mix alcohol with cannabis. So alcohol and beer sales is not an option.

Many of the landlords that I've spoken with to consider the possibility of a lounge they said based on what the city ordinance would come and look like so thank you very much.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:11:28

Thank You Jeff any comments online?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:11:31

Yes, Mayor. We have five raised hands so far. First we'll have Larry Steingold followed by Jackie Suebeck and then Jake Wall. Larry you have the floor? Thank you.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction1:11:40

First I support the lounges on moving. I also support keeping them all under three ownerships and three locations not six which could possibly happen and then they could sell those off and you could be dealing with six owners and doing this again in the future for more locations. And it's quite really interesting that first it started out illegal, now it's let's move to Vons which is what we talked about two years ago and four years ago when they were here before. So why don't we just all go and get it done? But the big issue is going to be parking. They're gonna move to Ojai Avenue or what have you, and we don't have a valet parking plan They want to have a restaurant with food. They want entertainment, they want bars, whatever. Call it whatever you want but they're going to have a lot of people.

They're not going to have all the parking that's required per code so they're gonna need valet parking. We need a valet parking. You know no valet parking on Ojai Avenue. You can't pull in and pull out. Whatever figure that out but we got to get that done And maybe if they want something from the city and they want from the residents, maybe they would be willing to pay a higher tax rate. Just a question because we're giving their getting this is obviously financial so maybe the city should partake in some of their increased earnings per se because we may need more police support.

Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:13:12

Thank you Larry

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:13:14

Next, we have Jackie Subic followed by Jake Wall and then Becky. Jackie Subic you have the floor?

1:13 – 1:2117 turns

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:13:23

Hi good evening. Am I being heard yes?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:13:26

Yes.

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:13:27

Okay, fabulous. Thank you. Good evening everybody. My name is Jackie Subick. Some of you have heard from me before, others have not. I'm a longtime cannabis advocate in the state particularly in West Hollywood where I actually helped create the Cannabis Consumption Lounge program and helped write the ordinance for that. So a lot has changed since the last time that I talked to you and one of the things that's changed is we have open lounges now And so

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:13:55

can I ask the audience to be quiet? It's hard to hear up here with the ambient noise. So if you could stop any conversation, that would be great. Thank you.

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:14:04

I can try to talk a little louder as well.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:14:06

Go ahead Jackie.

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:14:08

Okay, great. So I want to just address a few of the questions that came up tonight here and one of them is about the indoor outdoor so we have a lounge now in West Hollywood called The Woods it's actually open owned by Woody Harrelson and their floor plan they got 6,000 square feet and when you go in from this in the front door there's a store they have their dispensary there's also a side entrance and behind the dispensary is a giant courtyard That's very beautiful, like an oasis. They have they have open smoking inside of that courtyard. They also have cabanas that they built that you could also rent and both of those places the cabanas and the exterior locations have air scrubbers and certain air filtration and odor control mitigative equipment in there.

It's required by the city, so that is very doable. I go there frequently and you're not coughing. There's not wafts of smoke everywhere that just hang out. They quickly get scrubbed away. The second thing I want to talk about is the beverages. I don't even know if everybody knows but cannabis beverages have become a really big item because especially at the lounges where you don't have alcohol, now you can have these cannabis beverages. They're very low milligrams most of them. They'll give you a glass of ice. You can pour it over a glass of ice. It's like a cocktail only it's cannabis and so it's a lot of fun and they're really low dose too so that your people aren't getting super super high off of them So I wanted to share that with you.

Um, I agree on the hours of look at the hours of operation and what I want to say about that is a lot of state law allows you to sell cannabis till 10pm but the local jurisdictions allow you to stay open if you want all the way until 2am between 10pm and 2am is personal use. If you're telling a lounge that you want them to serve food, well they can still sell food after 10 p.m., they can't sell cannabis anymore but they could sell food and beverage. That's a lot of hours of revenue that you're adding to these businesses who are struggling so I want to consider that more of a small business kind of thing And then the other thing I want to quickly touch on is the food itself.

Lounges are currently allowed to sell prepackaged food and non-alcoholic beverages, as long as they're prepackaged. There's a bill running through the Sacramento right now You want to hear the rest of that? Go

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:16:29

ahead, Jackie.

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:16:31

You can continue about Sacramento. There's a bill running in Sacramento right now. It's already cleared the assembly. It's just about to clear the Senate, which we already worked. That's already happened. We're hoping the governor will sign it. That bill would then allow the lounges in addition having prepackaged food and beverage abilities that would also allow them to have prepared foods. So when people are talking about a restaurant That law would then allow them to have a restaurant. So now you've got a restaurant, you've got a cannabis consumption lounge and you've got cannabis beverages so it's a complete package. I just wanted to point that out to you so that you understood all of the things people are talking about at the dais these are now becoming possible.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:17:12

Thank You Jackie.

CommentJackie SubickProposedself-stated1:17:13

Thank you

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:17:14

Next we have Jake Wall followed by Becky and then Taryn Longo. Jake Wall you have the floor?

CommentTaryn LongoProposed · by introduction1:17:20

Thank you, good evening Council people. I appreciate your time. I am a long-time coastal and valley resident. I'm homegrown and I'm speaking to you this evening just to consider equality here. First of all again kudos to you for continuing to move things forward that said looking at the space itself you've already heard comment about indoor versus outdoor I do believe that outdoor is incredibly important, given that we are a community that enjoys most of the time very nice weather and it's whether you want to be outside and you want to enjoy. We've seen how for example during the COVID pandemic how the outdoor dining experience with other aspects that were optimized really helped increase businesses and continue to sustain foot traffic and patrons.

This is an opportunity for the same opportunity for Cannabis Consumption Lounge By limiting it to indoor only, as well as limiting the hours you're creating an experience that actually is less like a consumption lounge and it seems to be a little bit more strictly involving a I would say medical treatment aspect. The medical aspect of cannabis is undeniable, but when we're talking about a consumption lounge experience it's important to understand that there is also that recreational use. And you want to be able to bridge the gap between the two for both the lounges and those parties to be successful, for the consumers who wants to come back and for you as the county to benefit on the additional revenues that will come through.

Now I won't speak to the zoning aspects themselves. I think you guys are better suited to make those decisions, but I would just simply say that when you look at placement of these opportunities it's important to understand that for people who are dry curious sober curious Aspects of beverage consumption in particular are the alternatives to going to a bar or going to another happy hour experience. And let's be very clear, happy hour experiences and nightlife don't end at 7pm.

I think if you're being reasonable here and you're looking at this opportunity, you need to at least consider extending these hours of operation till 10 p.m., and alongside that opening things up to an outdoor experience which at least is inclusive of vaping, if not something supervised with smoke heaters and otherwise. These are existing technologies that have been in place for other smoke lounges like Cohiba and otherwise in many different communities. I'll give you time back within the last 30 seconds and just say again, thank you for the progress that you've made so far. We think that you're on the right track but if we can make a few more adjustments here, I think we've got something that we can really work with it will continue to benefit the Ohio community.

Thank you again for your hard work.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:20:08

Thank you Jake.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:20:10

Last raise hand we have is Taryn Longo. Taryn you have the floor? Taryn are you still there? We have one last call before

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:20:24

I'm here. Sorry, I'm here Um, hello. My name is Karen and I just want to give my support for the lounge to be both indoor and outdoor open air space. I think that some of the concerns they're valid but they are also probably concerns from people who don't really smoke and who don't really know what it's like. It's not going to be like super, super smoky and intense. People are pretty chill The research backs that it's less dangerous than alcohol.

So I do think it should be open until 10 p.m., at least, and that's it. Thank you very much.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:21:07

Thank you, Taryn. We now have two more. We'll have Severo followed by Becky. Severo, you have the floor?

1:21 – 1:3916 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:21:16

Good evening council members. Could you hear me? Yes. Okay, and Mayor Sticks. I'm here to speak in support of the lounge. I wish I could be there in person just to add my full support because I think it's been a long time coming. I was on the council when we first introduced medicinal use. And I think it's just important that we keep supporting this recreational use of cannabis because it is proven to be safe, it's proven to have a lot of benefits and I would compare it similar to the use of people that want to consume alcohol and in my opinion it's been proven responsible use of cannabis is actually more responsible just in general than alcohol. So I would also want you to expand and think about adding or closing later at a later time, and also adding I think it is important for us to think broadly about this.

And I just, I can't say enough of the people that have worked on this issue including staff and I'm not an avid I'm not a smoker at all, but I do support people that do choose to be avid smokers. And yeah, so I ditto everybody else's comment from Bill Miley to Mr. Weyrich, to all the other speakers that have spoken. So I appreciate your time. Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:08

Thank you, Severo.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:23:10

Next we have Becky.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:23:15

Thank you, Weston. I wasn't really planning to talk tonight and I'm really grateful to all the people who have because I've gotten a lot more information that I didn't know previously but I do have a couple of observations I'd like to make. First is when this was first discussed A few months ago, as I understood it the way that it was left is that as Larry Steingold mentioned. It was sort of like an experiment with three possible lounges. I believe they were to be owned by dispensary operators and somehow associated with those businesses. So there were basically three locations and three potential owners rather than a series of different owners And I really like the idea of continuing in that vein, of considering this as an experiment with just the three locations initially at least so that we can see what unintended consequences might arise as a result of at least trying them out with these three initial units.

Now some of the things that have caused me some concern in the past are things like increased traffic, turning Ojai into a Mecca for people who want to move into an alternate reality through wineries, breweries and cannabis lounges rather than You know, staying grounded in everyday reality which isn't the only thing reality that exists but I think our culture has gone too far in the direction of alternate facts and alternate realities. And so I kind of like having people to remain grounded at least to some degree.

I also think we need to look at the environmental impacts, the potential fire impact I'm really grateful to hear about there's these air scrubbers and other things like that, that can mitigate against smoke and other nuisance odors or whatever that people might experience. But we also have to look at things like traffic study. Somebody brought up valet parking which i'm really not on board with And I'm also concerned about the impact on our local residents and our local footprint, given the fact that this will undoubtedly bring more tourism, more potential new residents, potential demand for STRs which are now banned in our city.

And a lot of other things that I think we need to really think twice about whether we want to invite more into our town. So I really am In conclusion, just really encouraging the council to look at limiting this to the three locations, three owners and to do all the necessary checks and balances in advance as much as possible.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:26:20

Thank you Becky

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:26:21

That's all, Mayor.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:26:22

Okay. All right we will go ahead and close the public hearing and move on to council discussion. Who would like to begin? Council Member Lange.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:26:29

Okay.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:26:29

Thank

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:26:29

you. All right so I have a few things that I'd like to start with and that is just speaking from a purely practical standpoint. I'm a believer that it's a good idea to support small businesses in our community And that if this is, like Becky and Larry were saying, going to be a template or a pilot or a test then let's set them up for as much success as we can.

I do believe that, and I also am in agreement with what Bill Weirich said about ending destigmatizing marijuana usage. I think it's so important just from a social justice standpoint that we make a statement saying that the rhetoric around marijuana usage has been has been problematic at best. It's been racially motivated, and I think we need to do everything we can to change that. So I would be a proponent for increasing the hours or at least moving the hours back. I believe Bill suggested 10-9. I would even be open to saying 10-10 or 11-10 So that the people who would be otherwise using our bars and our facilities that serve alcohol could go here. I also do believe, from a safety standpoint, that it's going to be important for us to offer food, so non-cannabis food.

It slows down the processing of marijuana and also people are going to get the munchies. And that would be another revenue source for these, for the lounges. And so I'd like the ordinance to specify that, I believe it was Jackie who said that packaged foods or pre-packaged foods. So whatever is in accordance with state law that we include that. And then finally, I don't know exactly how I feel about smoke on the patios. But I would be okay with usage or outdoor usage that wouldn't be, you know, creating a lot of secondhand smoke for local residents.

But I'm not exactly sure about that. I don't know—I'd like to hear what you all think about that part of things. But the other thing too, I just want to say from an economic development standpoint this is kind of a no-brainer. And I know that our cannabis dispensary owners have worked really hard to push this forward, and so I'd like to support them. And I'm interested in hearing what you all have to say.

Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:29:50

Council Member Ruhl? In great form, I will just say ditto. But just a few other things. I agree with the small business element and having gone to these dispensaries and met with Chelsea and Michelle, I think that they epitomize a great small business owner And for that reason, not that I wouldn't support many great small business owners. But I am inclined to believe and to agree and to give them the due respect when they say they will deal With problems that they will I have, I believe that.

And so for that reason you know i would be willing to go with an indoor outdoor as you know a pilot program. I love the idea of a rooftop if that's a possibility The hours, I can't see why it wouldn't be increased to 10 p.m., and I would also be willing to let the business stay open till 2 to provide a place and some food and to make it as you say, let's set them up for success.

And as far as beverages, cannabis beverages. If that's the up and coming cannabis product we would be silly to say no you can't have that it makes perfect sense. Pre-packaged food yes and one thing I did sort of want to mention is in speaking You know, the cannabis dispensary owners. And they have a real approach to health and wellness which I don't think we can underestimate while it's not traditionally known... We're not thinking traditionally of medicinal versus recreational because I think that there is a blurring of the lines where they become, you know, they may focus on one or the other but the idea of massages with Oil. I mean, that's what I do for my dog and I know that she well, I mean I did do for my dog The puppy doesn't need it yet so That having been said and then finally You know as far as move and I know like I'm see I'm just giving away the house here but it just seems reasonable to me given the you know the south side of East Ojai Ave where the American Legion and You know, the hair studio is that space is really is prime commercial space that the city would benefit from having a good business there and there is parking so I.

I think we would need to talk to Lucas. I saw him back when I was getting some coffee, and he said the language would have to be squishier is what he said to allow some flexibility so he's got an idea of what squishy could be. So when I look at this, you know, when I look at this, I just say well this makes sense. So those are my comments and I would support and do support everything that I said in these modifications.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:33:23

Mayor Pro Tem? So I'm in favor of complete destigmatization because, I mean, I'm familiar with the horrific past and it's time to make amends. I am in favor of leaving the operational details as much as possible out of the ordinance and leave it up to the city manager's discretion like the council did with the original dispensaries. We've been having this discussion, I believe now for six years beginning maybe 2017? I remember going to visit the area with Ryan in the rain and you know we've been at this for a long time I'm you know, the as far as the hours go let the owners. I don't know about 2 a.m But you know anything that we approve Correct me if I'm wrong it still has to go before the Planning Commission To see that things like traffic impact and impact on neighbors and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:30

Not as structured. If this is the way it's currently structured, the cannabis permits would come to the city manager's office not through planning. So this wouldn't have to... The cannabis permits if consistent with the ordinance would not go through the Planning Commission. It'd be like the original three dispensaries.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:34:47

But for example, if they bought a building and started a new business

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:53

As long as they're not modifying the building in any way that triggers a planning permit. So if you have an existing building and they're coming in and doing nothing but interior improvements, then that's an over-the-counter building permit on the building side, and then the cannabis side would be city manager's office. If however one of the lounges wanted to buy a site or rent a site, knock down a building and build a new building, then they're coming to planning for the new building, but not for the cannabis permit. As structured, the cannabis permit would just be the city manager's office.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:35:21

Okay, okay. Thank you for that clarification. So as far as I'm definitely in favor of at this point keeping three owners but as far as I'm not so I'm not opposed to separating dispensaries and lounges If because of real estate and building sizes, there may be good reason. Ideally I believe that everybody would like to see the dispensaries and the lounges together but if it's not possible, I think we need to put something in the ordinance that one owner, we have currently three businesses, that wouldn't change but if for example Chelsea couldn't expand in her location that she be allowed for example to have a lounge elsewhere. Let's see, I really like the idea of patio space outdoors and all of that if there is complaints as far as I know Chief Trina Newman there has been no complaints last time we asked Chief Fryhoff he said there have been no problems is that still?

The cannabis dispensaries or anything, okay no problems. One issue that came up last time was the concern of overconsumption and I'll just paraphrase what Jackie Suebeck wrote in her public comment. Now that we have a few lounges open and they've been operating for awhile we have been able to collect data on the concept of overconsumption As it turns out, this is an extremely rare occasion where a customer can sit down comfortably, relax, drink water and regain their footing. To this day I've never seen one single person being asked to leave being carried out by staff, or being belligerent in a cannabis lounge. It's something that only happens once in a great while and doesn't need as much regulation as non-cannabis consumers might think."

Did I say that I'm in favor of the comments made by my colleagues? And then we had one letter that I want to address That was in strong opposition to the lounges, and it had an article that was dated August 17 in The Washington Post. And I want to call your attention, you know he cites statistics but he leaves out You know, he says that the marijuana industry is a $30 billion business in 2022. Then he compares it to ice cream sales, chocolate and craft beer but it's a drop in the bucket compared to $249 billion, and that's 2010 on alcohol sales So you can look that up.

We need to remind people that if we do not have safe, places that sell safe products, safe places to consume then the black market flourishes so banning dispensaries and lounges is not an option. We've learned that the hard way. I, let me see. Do we need to go through the ordinance or are you catching our comments? It looks like you are. Staff

1:39 – 1:4513 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:39:06

is catching the comments but someone will need to make a motion who was on the council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:39:14

I want to make clear that I'm not in favor of banning outdoor consumption. I'm in favor of maybe describing some kind of regulation for it, but that would be fine. That's all yeah

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:39:28

Councilmember Whitman

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.771:39:30

Yeah, I just have a few comments So whatever that stigma issue is, I kind of doubt it exists in Ojai. My big concern is and I kind of side with people who have spoke in favor of progressing forward with marijuana commercial opportunities, that we do it carefully. That we do it, you know slowly and incrementally so it does concern me that Three potentially become six I think that the community is comfortable with our three dispensaries and And I have not heard any complaints from anybody that we do have those dispensaries.

I like the idea of giving a broad level of discretion to the city manager as opposed to having specific regulations Maybe they would eventually evolve into specific regulations, but it might be easier to adjust that way. And Mark likes the extra work. I do like the idea of confining this to the east end of Ojai Avenue, these uses to the east end of Ojai Avenue in terms of a location for lounges.

I don't particularly object but haven't really thought about it. But you know, the idea that we potentially move Order line, the western borderline to Fulton which would encompass the American Legion property. And it would encompass another block on OI Avenue. That, I think, would be OK. And I like the idea, although I don't think that's where this council is going to go, I like the idea of starting with one license for one lounge and see How that works for the community before we do three And and look at it in a year in terms of you know looking at should we have two or three licenses I would propose having, you know some type of a lottery to decide who would get the license and I Don't I'm kind of curious about the idea of moving, I'm not clear on the concept of moving the dispensary to the lounge location.

So then we're going to have the lounges also become dispensaries. And I actually am not clear on that concept, but those are my comments.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:43:17

Thank you. Well, I'm pretty much in agreement with almost everything that council members have been saying which is a great feeling and I love the idea that this is a pilot program and a template and it's beginning so we'll see how it goes. Also, I think in the past I've said one step at a time baby steps but I feel at this point historically the baby is up and running I'm probably driving at this point. It's probably that naughty teenager that Michelle mentioned.

So, I think just and I think we need to What about that? Cat's leashes. Okay, we need to set the business up for success and as Council Member Lange said it is a no brainer in terms of economic development and also I'd like to thank the business owners. I personally know Chelsea and Michelle and Jeff for your patience and your endurance because it has been a long time period And that it's really important for all of us to do everything we can to destigmatize an herb that's been around since the dawn of time, maybe?

And I like the idea of offering food and beverages. And I'd agree that being outside would be better if we can make that work and have air scrubbers. That sounds like a great idea. And also the idea of giving the operational details of the ordinance to our beloved city manager. So thank you very much for taking that on, if you will and I think that's a bit...and it makes sense of course to extend the hours because 7pm is pretty early.

So does anyone want to make a motion? I'll go ahead and make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:45:07

a motion. Can we still have discussion after the

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:10

motion? We need to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:45:13

yeah, I want to make it clarification Did we or did we not decide that the dispensaries And the lounges have to be at the same location. And if we didn't decide that, could we open the public hearing and have Chelsea explain why because of the shortage of you know, the right type of building that might be problematic? So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:38

no decision has yet been made. It'll be up to what motion is made and then passed by council. So I would defer back to the mayor if you wanted to take further comment on that but no decisions have been made yet it's up to the council

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:45:49

Let's

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:49

get a

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:45:49

motion

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:45:50

on the table.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:46 – 1:5330 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:46:00

At the moment, the city bans smoking tobacco products in any way in public. I think that's outright. The only exception I can think of would be a single family home where it's not regular on the outside but as you'll recall we've banned it on the outside of multi-family and any otherwise public employment place.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:46:20

Mm-hmm. Okay, thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.771:46:23

Yeah, so on that point someone suggested that for outdoor spaces you could limit it to vaping And actually, I don't know that much about how much vaping would tend to be disruptive to people adjacent to the property. But it seems like that might be a good option as opposed in Because we as a state limit smoking in public places, that we potentially confine smoke to the indoor portion with the appropriate scrubbing facilities.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:47:11

Can I add one thing? I really appreciate Jackie calling in with data from lounges that were existent right now, and I think that's super useful so we can lean into what is already happening.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:47:26

Great thanks and especially if there's anything with the air pollution control board. Okay so I will make a motion that we, I guess it would be to come back for ask staff to modify the existing ordinance is that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:47:46

So there's two basic choices. One would be to introduce an ordinance with oral amendments that could then come back next time for adoption. Choice two would be to direct staff to rewrite it, come back for introduction again. Between the two I'd suggest the first.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:47:58

Okay. I will go with the first. To ask staff to modify the ordinance limiting to three, limiting the number to three Opening up the area to the east end of Ojai. Can we follow this map right here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:30

Yeah, so the way to do that would be cannabis lounges may only be located in the C1 zone east of Park Road on the north side of Ojai Avenue. East of South Fulton Street on the south side of Ojai Avenue and in the M1 and NPD zones and may not be located in any other zone in the city.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:48:51

Thank you. And then leaving the operations details to the business and the city manager, also including the sale of non-cannabis food.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:49:09

Okay, great. Do we have a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:12

You want to second? Sure I'll second. Okay roll call please. I still need a question. I mean I still have the same question what does the current ordinance say about separating... We agree there should be three owners but it's still not clear to me what we're agreeing on as can you help me find the part that addresses location

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:38

So the draft ordinance in attachment A, page 7 at the top subsection B requires that the lounges be tied to an existing dispensary. up to three lounges that could be located anywhere you have an existing dispensary tied to the existing three dispensaries. So three dispensaries could be three lounges, but the dispensaries would be allowed in the other part of the ordinance to expand to the rest of the specified areas so you could end up with a maximum of six dispensaries, of which three would have a paired lounge.

If you wanted to create more flexibility as may be the case given the discussion then the direction would be to drop the requirement that the lounge be co-located with a dispensary. So, then it would be up to six dispensaries and up to... But the six dispensaries would still be the same three ownership as existing licenses and then up to three lounges with the same one each per the three ownerships.

So a max total of nine locations but not requiring the lounge in the dispensary to be together.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:50:46

I'm sorry, that's completely confusing to me. And I don't care if everybody else is clear, I'm confused. I am not understanding why we would end up with nine. In my mind, the most we would end up with is three dispensaries. Three lounges that are either located with the dispensaries or at a separate location which would be driven by real estate economic necessity.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:51:18

So that's an option too? It's up to what the council wants?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:51:20

Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:51:22

that's what I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:51:22

understood. I'd

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.771:51:23

prefer what she said to having nine. Same

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:51:27

here. That's what I understood. Also just for the competition for again we want to set our current owners up for success and I think eliminating potential outsiders coming in to do that. I'm with Susan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:51:43

Yeah, same three owners. They have three, there are existing three dispensaries and if they can manage to locate the lounges around the existing building or connected, they will. Or there's an option that they locate the lounges elsewhere.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:05

So as I understand, then that would be to have a maximum of three lounges located anywhere in the zone I described and a maximum of three dispensaries located anywhere in the broader C1 and existing M1 and MPD zones. And both of these are tied to one each, the existing three permitted dispensaries which means existing three permitted dispensaries could stay where they are or move but not double.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:52:32

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:33

So then the net max would be three lounges and three dispensaries?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:52:36

Yeah, thank you so much. Okay. All right well we have a motion and we have a second. And

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.771:52:40

just one more point of clarification. The dispensary and the lounge licenses could not be split and maintained separately and maybe that was implicit in what you said but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:57

Yet it would be tied to only the existing three dispensaries as the only licensees for lounges.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:53:05

Okay, all right. Council Member

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:53:07

Lange? Yes I wanted to add one more thing to my motion and that is removing from the current ordinance any prohibition to outdoor space. And having staff recommend, I think if that could fall under the operations details so that the city manager could work with the lounge owners and work with any air pollution regulations. I would like to add that to my motion. Okay,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:53:42

all right we have a motion. We have a second. Could we have... Just a minute, just a reminder Council could you come through the chair? We do have a question about the hours. Do you want to add something to that?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:53:55

Except for that we would allow to at least 10 p.m

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:54 – 2:0924 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:54:17

As you know. Okay, that's all I just wanted to say. Yeah, that could be an additional

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:54:22

direction from the manager.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:54:23

All right, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:54:23

you. You're not a fuddy-duddy are you? Yeah. I only have

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:54:27

960

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:29

hours to do this.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:54:30

Okay, roll call please.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role1:54:35

We are going to repeat the motion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:54:36

Yeah, I'm happy to take a stab at that one. So it would be... I can as well. To introduce the ordinance as proposed with certain modifications that would provide a limitation of maximum three lounges and three dispensaries with the licenses for lounges tied to the licenses for the existing three dispensaries The same for the three existing dispensaries, which could move or stay where they are within the zones as described. The zones would be for dispensaries, the C1 general commercial zone and the M1 NMPD zones. The zones for Long would be the C1 zone east of Park Road on the north side of Ojai Avenue, the C-1 zone east of South Fulton Street on the south side of Ojai Avenue and The existing M1 and MPD zones.

The operational details would otherwise be left to the city manager with two exceptions, outdoor cannabis consumption would be allowed subject to rules and regulations as developed by the manager. And hours will be up till 10 p.m., subject again to rules and regulations as developed by the manager.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:55:45

Councilmember rule

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:55:46

yeah, I need a clarification. I need a clarification Okay so what I heard was that the dispensaries could not be in the area on the south side of Ojai Ave That only the lounges could be on the south side of Ojai, but we should be able to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:56:04

oh no the I'm sorry to interrupt there Yeah please the zone for the dispensaries is broader than the zone for the lounges and

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:56:12

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:56:13

The reason I... The dispensaries don't have that east side, south side limitation because it's the entire C1.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:56:20

Okay great

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:56:20

thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:56:20

you. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:56:21

you. And there was a map

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:56:22

in the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:56:22

package. Yes thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:56:23

you. Are we ready for the roll call? And thank you council for all the teamwork and it takes a team. Okay Weston roll call.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
All right Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Francina. Councilmember Lange? Yes. Mayor Stixx? Yes. Councilmember Ruhl? Yes

All right, motion passes 5-0 Let's take a short break and we will be back Okay, we are back And we'll return to the public hearing it's item number three introduction of a draft ordinance regarding amendments to existing unlawful short-term transient and vacation rentals to further strengthen the city's prohibition of short-term rentals Do we have a staff report? Mr. City Manager

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:11

Yeah, I'm going to turn to Lucas on this one. It's very technical and I'm punting.

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:07:19

You've punted? That's fine. Good evening, Mayor and City Council members. My name is Lucas Seibert I am the Community Development Director for the city of Ojai The proposed ordinance before the City Council for consideration does two things first It further strengthens the code as it relates to short-term rentals within Ojai by shifting from the permissive zoning designation to expressly calling out the land use within the zoning ordinance or use charts Which is in title 10 And clarifies the one calendar month versus 30 days. And this is really kind of due to that pesky month known as February. Second, it further strengthens the prohibition of short-term rentals identified within the code by expressly calling out short-term transient vacation rentals thoroughly or through a newly created section within Title IV Chapter 24 which is really where STR's or Short Term Rentals lives.

Both areas would further strengthen city code to continue enforcing rentals which are advertised and or marketed for less than one calendar month as proposed. The proposed ordinance revisions are included as attachment A to the staff report, and include strikethrough areas identifying language proposed for removal, and underlined areas identifying language proposed for inclusion within the ordinance itself. The reason this is coming before the City Council is because it was requested by council in 2022 and then brought through Planning Commission in February of 2022. So, it's gone through the process before coming before this body tonight.

And it caught the city's attention with case law based partially on the permissive zoning application. That's identified further within the staff report itself. Now, why has this taken so long? I did say 2022 and not 2023. Well, this item has patiently waited its turn to be before this body and that's why it's here tonight. Now for those interested in the permissive zoning, it's identified as any land use not expressly allowed or permitted via a determination or substantially similar use within Title 10 of our code which would make that use prohibited.

Simply put if not listed then prohibited. Now staffs recommended moving forward with the ordinance provided in this packet and I'm available for any questions by council

2:09 – 2:1823 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:09:55

Thank you, Lucas, for this patient ordinance. Much appreciated. Questions from council? Council Member Lange.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:10:01

I do. Yes. So thank you very much and so I had a couple of questions about the logistics. I know that in our community we have people who stumble upon vacation rental listings Or there are owners of vacation properties who will prorate their 30-day or their monthly bookings. So do we have an enforcement process for this right now?

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:10:38

Yes, we do. Code enforcement is very active and I would say very aggressive. We have strategies which I will not identify here tonight because they are secret strategies but we do have ways in which we aggressively go after ones that are illicit or not operating within the parameters of the code.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:57

And I'll just add, if I could, that if anybody comes across unlawful short-term rental advertisement or it becomes aware of a rental that's advertised at 30 days but they believe has been operated in less than 30 days, they should report that to the city through the app or online. Or is there a phone number?

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:11:16

There is a phone number. I mean, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:19

could... Yeah,

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:11:20

just give the phone number. It's 805-646-5581 extension 117. That's the co-compliance line and that gets you directly to co-compliance and then it becomes confidential in terms of who's identifying the areas and then we do that research and reconnaissance.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:11:37

Other questions? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem. How are

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:11:43

we doing with raising the...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:11:44

Microphone please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:11:47

Can we ask about questions like raising the fines or have we recently raised the fines?

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:11:53

The fines have not been raised. Currently, the fine is $500 per 14 for their processing so it's $514 for each violation.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:12:03

I am planning to bring up enforcement as something that we need to get on the agenda. My understanding is, we can't address anything like that based upon what's in front of us tonight. We can ask them to bring enforcement measures back to us. Correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:26

Right, so for example if the council wanted to look at increasing the fines Council could direct tonight's staff to bring that back in a future night we couldn't adopt the higher fine tonight Okay But we could give direction and bring

CommentPauline KafkaProposedself-stated2:12:37

it

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:12:38

back

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:12:39

Quick question yes council member would we do that at the end of I mean would that be a future agenda item or Would we do that here and now

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:47

It could be done as part of this item. Okay, thank you related to the short-term rental concept

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:12:51

Okay, I actually have a question for the city manager because I know you've had a lot of experience especially in Indio with this So could you just briefly describe in your opinion how short-term rentals destroy communities?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:13:08

Yeah, and I don't want to get way off topic because it's You know, this is not a discussion generically but briefly. What happens in neighborhoods where especially in communities where the land value is high And the desirability factor is high. When people start finding a short-term rental market, it very quickly turns neighborhoods into something that is not your typical residential neighborhood.

And we saw that in the desert. In fact, if you look at the cities in the desert there's nine incorporated cities in the desert I think seven of them now, at least six of them have either full prohibitions on short-term rentals or very stringent restrictions One of the exceptions was my city because we didn't have hotels and we had festivals And there was no way in the world the city of Indio can operate without short-term rentals in order to handle the festivals. But what it did do is it turned whole neighborhoods into short-term rental markets, including my own.

And frankly, the best economic thing that ever happened to me in my life was when my neighborhood Went all short-term rental, and I got an offer that I never expected to get in my life. But it completely ruined that neighborhood in terms of any residential viability. And it affected the housing supply. It affected it very significantly. Almost all the other cities cut back on short-term rentals because it was affecting housing supply and it was very definitely affecting the residential neighborhood communities. So I think you're all very smart to be very careful about what you allow with short term rentals

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:15:24

Great, thank you. Any other questions from Council?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:15:28

I have a quick one so I Think we've talked about this at one of our meetings But The the concept of or the strategy of fractionalization of units And my understanding of that is that you sell a place to many, many, many people like a timeshare type of situation. And it's effectively a vacation rental but it's not exactly the same creature And so my question is, does our current ordinance capture or prohibit fractionalization?

Where someone might get one week a year in a place in Ojai.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:16:26

Yes, so I'll start with the yes is our current position but it could always be strengthened. Fractionalization refers to a couple of companies that have sort of invented this model where you take ownership of a residential property, sell the property to an LLC, the members of the LLC, that is the owners of the LLC are then somewhere between 2 and 20 individuals or perhaps trusts, who then as a member of the LLC have a right to occupy the house for their share. If it's two it's 50-50 if it's four its quarters etc and It's a new creation that's been pioneered by a company out of the Bay Area one of the techie companies there's a whole lot of them in Sonoma and Napa and that wine region And they're moving into Southern California. We're starting to see them in this coastal regions They have so far targeted properties north of 2 million Targeting about half a million per share for quarters Which is a little above our typical price point, but certainly there are plenty of properties in Ojai that fit that category So the risk is there Our position is that however structured, if the net economic effect is a timeshare even though it's an ownership system they still have per the operating agreement in the LLC a time-limited right for which they've paid for and therefore it amounts to a timeshare.

So our existing prohibition on timeshares prohibits it That's our the city's current position Staff would not be opposed to coming back with an ordinance designed to further it prevent it The matter is being litigated in Sonoma and I believe also Napa And none of that has hit the Court of Appeal yet, so we don't have reported case law So it's very much a cutting-edge Problem and we'd be happy with council support to return with an ordinance further designed to prevent that creative But still in the end a timeshare

2:18 – 2:2813 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:18:28

Any other questions from Council Okay, we will go ahead and open the public hearing. Our first speaker is Michelle Mazur And we have Nora Harold

CommentIkshal MazurProposedself-stated2:18:45

Hi City Council, my name is Ikshal Mazur and I was raised here in Ojai. I am speaking today to support a harsh ban of Airbnbs and short-term rentals across Ojai because of Ojai's lack of approval of new housing growing property taxes and increasing cost of living people in our city are looking to offset these expenses through Airbnb And why should they not? Who could blame them? After all, most residents who grew up here probably have much of their liquidity in their homes.

They do not plan on selling their homes and perhaps not much of a retirement plan either. They're also past the age of having children. So I ask you to take this a step further. City Council should ban the advertising of all short-term rentals in residential zones across Ojai, but this should also be done in conjunction with two other actions which center around housing. The other two actions are Step 1, permit short term rentals in commercial zones because there is a market for it.

For example, Main Street commercial buildings downtown should have a second story that can be rented out for short or long-term rentals. The transient occupancy taxes alone from this will provide a lot of cash relief to Ojai. Step two, build more housing. You guys, as a council have the obligation to help young families who can afford the three to $5,000 per month in rent that Ojai commands. But those people will send their kids to public schools instead of new homeowners who can afford to send their kids to private schools in Ojai.

These people need two to three bedroom starter homes or apartments in our valley so we don't have to close down every single school. In short, please ban short-term rentals in residential zones only. Change zonings to permit short-term rentals in commercial zone and approve new housing for residents so we can have young families in Ojai again. Thank you. Thank you,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:20:54

Ixchel. Next, we have Nora Harold

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:20:59

Hi, everybody. I really want to thank you all on this meeting tonight. It's been so wonderful and on the work you all did for the unhoused population during this storm. I also want to thank you all for taking up this issue. STRs have really destroyed... Well we heard about it. I'm just really here to support you being as bold and brave and powerful as you can in ridding the valley of STRs. I know you don't have purview over the entire valley. I live in Miners Oaks, and I lived across the street from a short-term rental for a period of time, and it was like living across the street from a hotel. I never knew who was there.

And I love my neighbors, right? I'm like our neighborhood is awesome now that they're not there. We all know each other again and we have community and we have potlucks and we have love with each other in healing and STRs are a problem when it comes to these things so Thank you very much. I really encourage you all to be as stringent with advertising bans, bans on short-term rentals, extending the period of time going from beyond 30 days. I encourage you to do it all.

Yeah. Thanks.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:22:21

Thank you, Nora. That's not a card right there? That's

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:22:24

for future

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:22:25

items. Anyone online?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:22:26

Yes we have two on Zoom. First we have Larry Steingold followed by Vicki Carlton Byrne. Larry, you have the floor. Larry please unmute one more time. Give him one more second I know he's there. Larry please unmute. Last call Larry before we move on. All right next we have Vicki Carlton Byrne. Vicki you have the floor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:23:02

Thank you. Good evening, just a quick remark about the company you were talking about with fractional ownership that is Picasa and they have moved into both Malibu and Santa Barbara. So it's it's a thing and it's something to consider to add into your deliberations. About seven years ago I began identifying and mapping short term metals in the Ojai Valley Valley-wide at last count, there are over 225 active STRs representing accommodations for more than 1200 people.

In the city limits, there are somewhere between 35 and 40 active short term rentals not including those that are completely underground. They're increasing on a weekly basis. I'm regularly asked why any are operating if they're illegal. And the answer is twofold, the operators lie and game the system and the city staff hasn't been given effective enforcement tools by the City Council that other cities have to shut them down.

Listings will stay 30 days only, but can be booked short-term through private communications. Some hosts will book short term on weekends when staff is not monitoring then change booking options on weekdays. Some hosts will take a 30 day deposit guests will stay for a weekend and then get a refund. The current fine for violation was mentioned, it's woefully insufficient. $500 is not much of a deterrent in Ojai where the average nightly rate is about $420 and no matter whether the hosts are technically in compliance or not these properties are not available for people to live in Owning an STR in Ojai has become quite lucrative and relatively risk-free.

For example, recently a realtor from Venice has purchased three properties in the city limits and is short term renting them off of their private website. I support clarifying the language in Ojai's code to prohibit STRs but it doesn't really matter how an ordinance reads if it can't be effectively enforced. All council members are sworn or have sworn to uphold the law. And I hope this council will provide staff with more effective tools to do so.

Neighbors deserve to live next to neighbors, not hotels. Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:25:37

Thank you, Vicki.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:25:38

That's all ma'am.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:25:38

Okay we will close the public hearing and move on to council discussion. Who would like to begin? So

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:25:50

I support all the amendments. They seem pretty simple and they seem to strengthen. I would like to see us bring back, or have staff bring back recommendations about increasing the length from 30 days to at least 60 days I would like to see us look at methods of enforcement that may include increasing the fines, potentially graduate the fines so that first time offense is $1,000 second-time offense maybe five thousand dollars and a third time offense. I think should be something pretty significant.

I think also look at Awarding attorneys fees to a successful prosecution and I also want us to look at The strengthening our ability to protect against Fractionalization, which I think is Coming here and then I'll just make kind of a quick comment that Since I've been on the Planning Commission 20 years ago, I came to understand that This is part of our general plan that it's really critical to housing affordability, that we protect our existing affordable housing stock.

And that's exactly what we're talking about here today so we need to do what we can to make sure those places Even if they don't have, you know, deed restrictions or whatever else attached to them. If they're functionally affordable we need to keep them available for people to rent as a place to live so we don't become a community of visitors. Thanks

2:28 – 2:3619 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:11

I support all the recommendations that my colleague Andrew Whitman stated, and I just want to clarify both for myself and the public. You can still rent a room to a friend For a month You're just not advertising it as an SDR if you know someone that's in between looking for rentals And and you know as a temporary place, maybe their stuff is in storage. You can still rent out a room short-term That's different from an STR

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:28:42

or a month or longer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:44

for a month or longer Well, I mean

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:28:47

Not less than a month

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:50

OK, let's talk about that. Because in reality you might have a friend that needs a place to stay for a week and there's nothing to prevent them from chipping in for utilities or whatever. It's not like a draconian rule that somebody is going to be spying if you rent a room to... That's just not Ojai. If

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:29:10

you have a friend stay with you and they gift you a certain amount of money in return for utilities, that wouldn't be a rental contract?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:29:16

There's no rental contract. They just yeah, we can I mean there are some things that are understood Okay but the point is That you can still rent out a room to a tenant for a month or longer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:29:30

correct month or longer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:29:31

That's, you know that we have to really distinguish that from an STR. And I will testify that I found many and not many but there were places that were kind of a what do you call it? A hybrid part of the time they would do a furnished rental maybe two local resident and then the other part of the time if it operated more like an STR and that's what we want to prevent so that we do save those places for our For our people that work and live here.

Councilmember

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:30:06

Wolfe?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:30:06

Yeah, so if you can rent out a room for a month or more how is that different from being able to rent out a short-term rental for a month or more I mean where's the...I don't see the distinction there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:21

The key is the month or more Short

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:30:23

term

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:30:23

rentals are allowed for a month or more renting rooms allowed for a

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:30:29

So it's six of one half dozen to the other. I'm just saying, I don't see the distinction there because they both have the same requirement which is it has to be rented for a month or more. Exactly. That's all I'm saying. There is no distinction there. Okay thank you so that's...I just needed to make that because it didn't...I wasn't grokking like how that was different.

So I do support, you know, rethinking all of this and making it more stringent and keeping our neighborhoods, you know, neighborhoods to speak of. But I would point out again that we have a number of items around housing, and this is one of them. And the many times that we have talked about, I think it was the first... Well, it wasn't the first, second or third but in the fourth session We talked about having a housing discussion, you know, a housing workshop and we couldn't even figure out what that would look like. But as we keep adding these things it makes little sense to me to isolate them without putting them in the big picture. I mean because it's just, you know, it's siloing something that is That is much larger we heard our one of the public comments say you know yes I want this but what about building housing and what about you know putting this into allowing.

You know the commercial zones so this is all part of a discussion and I would like once again to have it be a Siloing and getting nowhere really because we have the priorities list I know it is And I just so I wanted to say yes, and I think before we start bringing back ordinances We have that priority discussion. We talk about housing from A to Z as much as we possibly can It just seems to me. It's spinning our wheels if we have our city attorney writing these ordinances You know, and then I will point out if there are lawsuits we should wait until those lawsuits are decided before we start writing ordinances and things like that would be my opinion on the fracturalization. I mean we could write something but it just once again you know seems like there's so much we need to do to write ordinances before we have a court finding We may decide to write it even with a court finding, but I'd like to see that before we start writing ordinances.

Councilmember

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:33:03

Lange.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:33:03

Yeah so I Want to speak to I'll speak to what you just said in just a second But you know, I also lived in the desert town in 2016 Joshua Tree and watched our entire community within a year be destroyed families who had grown up there not being able to afford houses because all of these People from LA were moving to Joshua Tree or buying second houses and the short-term rentals were paying for their mortgage.

And so this is something that I witnessed firsthand, the entire community was really devastated and you know the weekends were too crowded I can't say enough in support of an ordinance for short term rentals. This ordinance to me feels like it falls more in the category of hotels and that even though there's a housing component to it, we're also talking about the business that is taken away from the inn or from the Hummingbird or the El Roblar coming up. And so, you know, and the TOT.

So I think we need to move forward with this before we address the rest of the housing. And then, I also want to speak to the few people who have talked to me about that they like to go away and rent their house here And I really do hear those perspectives, but I think if we open up the possibility of short-term rentals for a few exemptions or for a few different people it's a slippery slope that then puts us back into You know into it further perpetuates the lack of affordable housing here. So so So I just wanted to mention those those few

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:35:19

things I agree with my council members that we definitely need to strengthen this code and and Support the amendments and And increase the length of 60 days for sure. And also strengthen the methods of enforcement and increase the fines, and I like the idea about the attorney's fees also. And really protect our housing stock because the United Nations, for example, calls this, it says that if you want to protect your community, you've gotta ban short-term rentals basically.

We do have a consultant who does the searches for the ads Hdl. I believe

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:04

they do that we do use them

2:36 – 2:5137 turns

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:36:09

We do. Although I will

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:12

admit that...

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated2:36:14

I don't want to go into the details of it, but certainly staff and working with HDL.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:36:19

Okay and I know you know we have a very small staff and it takes a lot of time so I'd like to look at options. But we do have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:36:25

weekend coverage? Yes

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:36:30

And and then just I mean it I think and I hear you know, I've heard people say can't you bring this back? And they want to travel or they want to do this or that and I understand that I just think I'm gonna read a quotation from Carolyn fund risk his letter which was so eloquent So she wrote that such rentals undoubtedly affect the essential character of a neighborhood in the stability of a community short-term tenants have little interest in public agencies when the welfare of the citizenry They do not participate in local government, coach Little League or join the hospital guild. They do not lead a scout troop, a volunteer at the library or keep an eye on an elderly neighborly. Literally they are here today and gone tomorrow without engaging in the sort of activities that weld and strengthen the community so I think it's really our moral obligation to strengthen this ordinance and do everything we can to clarify any language that needs clarifying, and take care of our town.

And I think it's great that we have something that's there now, and just we need to make it stronger and more stringent so... And also, I know that there's been a lot of research on how to get around these issues, so I would really appreciate if staff could I have a little bit of hesitation still.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:38:05

You will see people who are desperate to stay with anybody under almost any circumstances just so they don't have to start commuting to work from Oxnard. They'll take a room for a week, a month, two months, whatever until they find something more permanent. So my question is it's a connected question. Advert how do you ban? Like if it's I mean, there's it's obvious when a person is Renting STR. You find them on the STR sites and if a person is renting a room They're just doing it You know from the Ojai housing side or through word-of-mouth Through friends and we can't we don't really expect to regulate Everything we can't we can't I mean if a neighbor doesn't see a constant stream of people with suitcases different people Then you know, there's a sign.

There's signs if a person is really living in a house for a month or two versus is a You know on vacation so I don't know how we can word the language so that it's not I Illegal for me, not that I have a house to rent. I'm renting a room myself but it's month-to-month and I wouldn't want someone who offered me a room for a month to get in trouble for it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:32

So let me try to clarify this. Month or longer rental so that includes month-to month is legal?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:39:39

But Betsy's, Mayor Sticks is asking for two months.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:43

That's a different conversation we'll have to have separate from this

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:39:46

ordinance. And just a reminder tonight we're just talking about strengthening the amendment the ordinance that we have. Oh

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:39:53

right so this is stuff no this is to bring back to us and then we can discuss the fine details I wanted to make a comment on what's been said and that is, I agree 100% with the idea that we need to have a workshop and we need to talk about housing As a holistic, you know across the community. What are our available solutions? Get feedback from the community about what they'd like to see. On the other hand I agree 100%.

With Councilmember Lange that short-term rentals are really kind of a different animal than quote unquote housing. It's more of a commercial endeavor and it's you know somewhere in the hotel range so I don't see any reason why we wouldn't bring and you know Move forward with addressing short-term rentals quickly while still getting on track. I think we had a housing workshop on track and it got derailed with other issues, but...

I think we all, the whole council would like to see us take a community partnership with our community and talk about how do we address housing for now and the future.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:41:29

Mayor Pro Tem? Okay, two things. I don't believe that the housing workshop that was held derailed just respectfully because...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:41:36

No, I wasn't trying to suggest that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:41:39

Okay. Thank you. All right. But my, uh, I wanted to ask about the point that one of the speakers made about permitting STRs and commercial zones. Um, I would not, I don' think I would be in favor of that because if we're going to permit housing it should be housing and commercial zones, not STRs. Right? That's the idea. Yeah, I mean I can understand why she would consider that. That's an improvement over residential neighborhoods But for example we have discussed Some kind of housing overlay on it's just been in discussion nothing official for example across the street from what the old West The American Legion, those buildings. They could have housing above some of those buildings and still keep the commercial. But we would want people that work in Ojai to live there.

So I don't think that's an option.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:42:40

Council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:42:41

could direct us to bring that back

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:42:43

in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:42:43

a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:42:43

future item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:42:45

And also I'm aware that there have been offices, and I believe he did come before the city you know on Bryant Street One of the owners those suites on you know what I'm talking about the though, you know It all already kind of looks like a condominium complex. It's beautifully Landscaped and I think and some people would like to live in those offices That's a separate conversation but that's something we might And that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:43:19

another idea that can be brought back as a future agenda item also not on this

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:43:24

item. Yeah, let's focus on this agenda item is somebody ready for a motion?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:43:29

Yeah, I'll make I'll make a motion

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:43:33

I'll second the motion. Let's hear the motion

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:43:37

first. The motion is that we approve the language that has been proposed and shown to us tonight, that we also instruct staff to bring back Any variety of issues addressing how to enforce the short-term rental ban, including but not limited to increasing the length of the ban to 60 days. To address fines. to address attorneys fees, to address fractionalization and to educate us on what other communities that are addressing this issue are doing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:33

And perhaps other enforcement tools?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:44:36

Yeah, including but not limited to those things. So any other enforcement tools that are out there I'm interested in.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:44:44

Great. Second? Someone like to second the motion?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:44:48

Sure. I second.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:44:49

Okay. Roll call please Weston.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion? Sure. I second. Okay. Roll call
Show transcript
Yes. Is the motion understood by all? Mayor Pro Tem Francina. Yes. Mayor Stix. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes Council Member Lange. Yes Council Member Ruhle. Yes

Okay, wonderful all right

we will move on to item number four Approval and acceptance of easement dedication trolley shelter stop at 205 West Ojai Avenue in front of Bank of America is do we have a staff report?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:45:22

Yes

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:45:22

Lindy's back

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:45:24

Thanks to Lindy Palmer for sticking around She's gonna do this report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:45:29

Thank you, Lindy. Of course. Good evening, mayor and council members. Hang on a second. Let me get this set up. So the item in front of you tonight has got several components and those are in your recommendations, which I'm going to spend a moment and talk to you about the history of this project. And I know a couple of you are fully aware about this. So in 2016, the city received some grant funding for a bus shelter. Actually, we applied for a grant and had five locations identified. When James hired me last year, about a year ago exactly he said we have to get this B of A bus shelter built. Yes you do! So that was number one on my list so I want to spend a few moments and talk to you about this because it has it's a seemingly very small very simple capital project.

It's not high dollar But there were so many moving parts for this project, and I had been working on it for a year. So I looked at the picture, looked at the bus bench, the existing bus bench, and I thought, I think that's on private property. Well, we hired a surveyor. It was determined that the bench, the existing bench is on private property. It's on Bank of America property.

So the next step in that whole process is trying to find a local contact at B of A who can talk about property acquisition because we needed an easement for that. So finally found somebody at Bank of America, a corporate office on the East Coast and before they would talk about any property negotiations whatsoever they needed to see a design. They had three criteria one being they wanted to maintain visibility of their business, of the bank from Ojai Avenue. They wanted the smallest footprint possible with the least amount of parking spaces impacted and they wanted it aesthetically pleasing.

So we hired Mark Whitman to produce a design for us, a preliminary design and back-and-forth we go with Bank of America So we finally settled on a design, which I'll show you some photos of it in a moment. But I wanted to just give you a little bit of a background first. So worked on a design that we could live with, that Bank of America could live with, that met our ADA requirements. So we finally got there.

Then we had to hire a surveyor again to give us a specific footprint for the easement. Then we needed a temporary construction easement because when we go to construct this, using Bank of America's parking lot in the front. So I worked with surveyor, architect, community development so far and Lucas who was just here, Lucas had given me a director's exemption on the loss of one parking space and the preliminary design.

Here we are now. The components of what I'm asking for tonight is the review of the final review of the bus shelter, what it looks like. And again these were many, many back and forths with Bank of America because they wanted it to look a certain way, they wanted low profile, all kinds of things. And then we got to execute our permanent easement so we are now asking BFA and they're doing this. They have been, they approached this as we want to be good neighbors to the city. We're not going to charge you for this which they could have, they didn't.

And we have gone back and forth on the design on the footprint of the easement. So temporary construction easement, a permanent construction easement and then approval of the design plan and authorizing staff to go out to bid so we can get this thing built. James, can you give me the next slide please? Here is an aerial photo of the site. The red line is the property line and the existing bench you can see in the green is on private property So and I've identified the parking spaces so we can talk about them based on numbers. So we are going to be four and five will stay as is, one in two will get re-striped moving to the west three will be gone completely.

So any questions on this slide? Okay next slide. So this is what we ended up with, with our permanent easement. It's going to be a 14 foot by 17 and 1⁄2 foot rectangle. Our bus bench and our bus shelter will be in that box. Next slide? Can I ask how many people... Oh there's the... Okay. So this is just a rendering. I'm sorry it's a little bit blurry. This is as good as I could get but this is sort of what it's going to look like. And you can see on the left hand side of this, of the shelter is handicapped parking for a wheelchair, and then we've got probably space for four to six to sit on the bench.

And of course there were some design challenges because we didn't want it to turn into say a queen size bed. Just saying so we had to kind of shrink it down a little bit. We had to stay in this footprint and we were mindful that we didn't want this to really be become someone's evening accommodations. So next slide. And so this is more of a, this is what the preliminary design looks like. The words aren't that important but it will be stone, it will be nice lumber on the roof we're not planning on tile. The tile's a little bit of a maintenance issue so we're going to do corrugated metal And that's sort of what it's gonna look like.

Next slide, and that's from the front and the back so from Ojai Avenue and from the bank now this is from either side. So one's from Blanche, one's from the west side. So this is what it looks like. So with that, I am available for any

2:51 – 2:5730 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:51:46

questions. Mayor Pro Tem?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:51:49

So I brought this forward because I kept seeing people sitting in Otterton 12 degrees there's no shade there surrounded by asphalt you would see mothers with children elderly people with their little cart and it just was Sad commentary because we're supposed to be a green city that encourages public transportation These people are wonderful. They're car-free, you know, they deserve a nice shady bus stop But my so my question is I'm happy that it accommodates four to six people That sounds about right but the we want it to also be a cooling place It's the metal Going to be hot. Is that the only option? That was my first thought

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:52:36

not necessarily Okay, it's high enough up we should get some air circulation underneath and and you can see the roof The roof is also sloped a bit. Okay, so if it rains So this is good for summer sun and winter weather as well And it's got a pretty significant cantilever meaning it goes over. It provides shade for more than just direct sun at noon Uh-huh, that's what the goal was to you know When the Sun is a little bit lower You can still have shade you might have to move around a little bit but there's still going to be shade

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:53:09

That sounds so good and mark does beautiful work. He does so it's gonna look really great doesn't Thank You Lindy thank you so much for all the Those steps to do something like this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:53:20

And thank you and to be something to be said about that is any time on a capital project, particularly when you're working with a private property owner? And again, they wanted to be good neighbors and they were willing to negotiate with us We may come across other projects that property owners aren't so willing. And this is a year when they're willing. So I'm just saying,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:53:48

I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:53:49

sure you can connect the

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:53:50

dots

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:53:51

on that

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:53:51

one. Any other questions from council? Any public comment on this item?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:53:57

No raised hands on Zoom for Item 4.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:54:00

Okay let's move onto discussion who would like to begin?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:54:06

I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:54:06

discussed it. Okay, we don't want to take too much time. Isn't it? Lindy said. It's kind of a done deal isn't it? Would someone like to make a motion?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:54:15

I would like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:54:16

to

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:54:16

make one question. First of all, I think the design is great. I think it's a great project. Did anyone look into solar lighting or options for that? We did.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:54:31

One thing that I'm trying to be mindful of when we build structures like this or do anything, is there's ongoing maintenance. And so the bank parking lot already has lights and so I'm trying to not incur ongoing maintenance if we don't have to. We have a hard enough time maintaining what we've got, we really do. And so we did look into it, we did discuss it and decided against it. Thank you. And one other, one other point I would like to make before your vote that so I will be calling Mark tomorrow if, if you approve this tonight and we have about he said maybe about a month before he's got to hire a structural engineer for the footings and for the structure, structural integrity of the structure. And so that's about a month out. So I will be coming back to you in say six weeks or so, six to eight weeks approving a contract for the construction of this.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:55:34

Thank you, Lindy. And thank you for all your hard work on this and your endurance to Bank of America for being such a good neighbor. Would anyone like to make a motion?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:55:43

I just have one more question, and this is just a technicality for our city attorney. If Councilmember Whitman's immediate family member is involved with that, would he still be able to vote on this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:55:59

My understanding is that Councilmember Whitman and his brother have no financial ties. Okay. And they're both adults, so assuming that's confirmed there is no, does not generate a conflict of accusal question. Mere sibling-ship doesn't itself generate a conflict of question as long as there's no financial ties at all.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:56:15

And I think the contract with my brother was entered before I was council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:56:20

member. It was. I believe that's also true.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.772:56:21

Yeah, so I'd make a motion that we authorize the execution of the permanent easement and direct staff to record. That we authorize the execution of the temporary construction easement and direct staff to record. And that we authorize staff to solicit bids for the construction of a trolley stop shelter. And I'll second it. OK,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:56:42

roll call please Weston? Did I second it? I think Council Member Lange did too.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:56:47

Second by Lange.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:56:48

It's my baby! Oh, OK. Do you want to go ahead? You can second it. No, I don't care. It is our baby.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role2:56:54

It

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:56:54

is our baby. I just read her from the staff recommendations.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Understood. Council Member Lange? Yes. Mayor Sticks? Yes. Council Member Ruhl? Yes, yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes! Mayor Pro Tem Fransina? Yes

Can I just ask, is there going to be a trash can nearby? I highly recommend it. I just keep seeing parking lots that have no trash cans and there's trash.

2:57 – 3:1022 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:57:29

We

CommentTaryn LongoProposed · by introduction2:57:29

will

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:57:31

move on to item number five, selection of executive search

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:57:38

firm to conduct the city manager recruitment.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:57:55

Let's just introduce it and turn it over to the mayor. The city did a request for proposals to hire an executive search firm to conduct the search for a new city manager. We got three great proposals from three great firms, Bob Murray & Associates, Peckham & McKinney, and Ralph Anderson & Associates Earlier today the City Council in closed session, which is allowable for something related to the city manager search did interviews with those firms and I will turn it over to the mayor and the council for that discussion.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:58:35

Well, first of all I just want to thank the three companies, Peckham & McKinney, Ralph Anderson Associates, Bob Marine Associates. We spoke to three incredible people who really were so knowledgeable and helpful and all of you would have been amazing. So it was a really hard choice to make. We appreciate all of your attention and paying attention to what's happening in Ojai which is interesting.

And we did come to a decision. We picked Ralph Anderson and Associates, Heather Rentschler whom we spoke to is the owner. We all loved Heather. We all loved all three actually. Just Heather has an incredible amount of experience. The firm's been around for 52 years. She's been working there since the 80s I believe And I personally feel extremely confident that she has exactly what it takes to find the perfect city manager for us. She's very attentive and also understands that it's an unusual market at this point because it's really hard to find a city manager, so I have a lot of confidence in her.

Thank you, thank you Heather also thank you to Tony and Gary because You're really incredible and we appreciate your time Any other council members mayor pro

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:00:03

tempo? I just want to echo the mayor's comments all three Search firms were outstanding. I would characterize them absolutely outstanding that some of them had unique qualities that the others didn't have, but we were happy to unite in appointing Heather and if you're watching Heather make sure that candidates watch this meeting.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:00:41

This is how we are all the time. Peace and love, Heather. I also want to thank Mark Scott our city manager for organizing this and also our city attorney because we really are grateful and it was really good interviews. Great selection, so thank you for all your hard work on that. Any other comments? Okay, is

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:01:07

there a motion? I'll just echo what has already been said that we had some really fine options to choose from and it was a very close choice between the candidates and I think we're gonna do great with who we've selected.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:29

Madam Mayor, I was going to just jump in there. If there's any public comment that would be good to take before

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:01:33

the vote. Oops, sorry. Oops! No raised hands on Zoom for item five. Okay, off the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:01:40

hook. Is there a motion? I'll make a motion that our selection for the search firm be Ralph Anderson and Associates led by Heather Rentschler.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:01:53

So second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:01:54

Why don't you second

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:01:54

it? I will second it. We need a roll call for that?

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion that our selection for the search firm be Ralph Anderson and Associates led by Heather Rentschler. So second? Why don't you second it
Show transcript
Yes, so I'll call ready. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Lange? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes Council Member Rule? Yes Mayor Stixx? Yes

Okay all right moving right along we will look at our last item number six a request to agendize ordinance to protect City Elephant bodily rights is there a staff report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:02:24

Not so much. This item was requested by council members to be added to the agenda and I put together something very brief but I'm gonna turn it back to the council members who brought this up. I think Council Member Rule is going to speak.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:02:39

Yeah, I'm happy to explain this. I do have sheets of paper for the information for those who are interested but essentially this ordinance will codify for Ojai an elephant's fundamental right to bodily liberty Which just simply means that you cannot hold an elephant captive in Ojai unless the space is comparable to an accredited sanctuary. This is a bodily rights ordinance, and people have asked me what about other animals? And I can speak to that, Why now? Why here, why now?

I will say that we will be the first city in the country to have an ordinance declaring a fundamental right of liberty for an animal. Why now, and why elephants? There have been suits around the country over the last six years. The most recent and the most high profile is Happy the Elephant in the Bronx Zoo who has been imprisoned for 40 years and has been by herself for 15 of those.

So this organization, the Non-Human Rights Project brought a habeas corpus case for unlawful detainment for Happy the Elephant in the Bronx Zoo. Six years in the courts it finally made it to the highest court in New York, seven judges, two of them... The decision went against Happy and for the Bronx Zoo But two of the judges issued an incredible dissent, pretty much asserting all of the reasons why sentient emotionally, intellectually and physically complexed animals should not be imprisoned in spaces that are not conducive to their health and wellness. So we have the highest court in New York has made a dissent, has dissented on that. Meanwhile, we have the Fresno Zoo that has three elephants in a small space and a suit was also filed for the Fresno Zoo.

It was found that the elephants, it was found for the Fresno Zoo that the elephants were not entitled to a fundamental right to liberty. So and this really comes down to the idea between welfare laws and rights. Welfare laws require that you have enforcement, there's all kinds of things and I have some papers to speak to that. But a fundamental right is a right which means I can go to court at any time. So this organization filed a suit against the Fresno Zoo. Fresno Zoo won basically on a welfare ordinance but they are now in the process of filing an appeal with the California State, I mean with the California Supreme Court And what we can do is we can show by passing this ordinance that we are part of a society that sees the changes happening around our understanding of the emotional and psychological and physical complexity of these large sentient beings that are being held captive in zoos.

So, that's why now That's why here, the Fresno Zoo is not that far away and you know there are other things about the Fresno Zoo. There were three elephants all taken from Africa, sold by a sanctuary in Africa claiming that the elephants needed to come to American zoos otherwise they would be euthanized because there wasn't room. There was a big uproar about that, probably not true. We've made a lot of money, so breeding is a lot of money. Meanwhile the Fresno Zoo with three elephants they tried to, one's a mama and her baby, her daughter and another male elephant. The Fresno Zoo wanted to breed them but unfortunately the male or the females were not interested So they packed off the male to the San Diego Zoo, and they brought in a stud. The mama and the baby are now pregnant.

And there is a whole idea around the breeding and captivity of these animals, and the idea is that they have a fundamental right to exist without Without benefit to humans. They do not exist to benefit humans, they have their own right to exist. So that's what this ordinance is about. It's a very simple ordinance it just simply says and you know it's a one off ordinance that says elephants cannot be held captive in Ojai unless they have standards that an accredited sanctuary would approve.

And so, and for people to say well we don't have any elephants. Well we did have a roller skating elephant at one time and I think that it was cute then. I don't think it would be cute now. So that's why this ordinance and basically it will lend credence to the appeal to the California Supreme Court to send the Fresno Elephants to a sanctuary to give them bodily liberty So I'm perfectly happy to answer questions. I'm sure there's probably a fair amount, but this is to me a civil rights issue.

It is a civil rights issue for animals and we know with scientific evidence the way the last 30 years have gone that they're emotionally, psychologically, intellectually very complex creatures So that's why I brought this motion forward. I think it is the first step to other things that Ojai can lead, you know we did have an animal rights and rights of nature forum so I see this as the beginning step and I'm hoping that my fellow council members can see the importance of this movement and of this motion Okay questions from Council

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:09:08

Councilmember Lange and then Mayor Pro Tem.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:09:11

Yes, so I received One of the public comments do we have did we at one time have? An animal keeping ordinance in the works We do have one yeah, okay because I'm wondering I mean I've I'm wondering if there's a way to, you know we can talk about this in discussion but what is the status of that animal keeping ordinance?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:09:48

I can answer because I read it. And basically it says that if you're going to keep certain animals and there's like no comprehensive list, but it's a traditionally wild animal. That you must keep it in an enclosure under conditions that are suitable to that animal, so it's kind of vague and it certainly could be improved.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:10:25

Yeah, I can speak to that as well. That ordinance is almost certainly an animal welfare ordinance and this is an animal rights ordinance. And they're hugely different in how they're enforced and what they actually grant the particular animal. I would say that was a distinction between the two and important a very important distinction between the two because there are animal welfare laws.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:11 – 3:1610 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:11:08

Okay, my understanding is that this is a simple ordinance that will not take up a lot of staff time. I think the public might be concerned about that. It's very simple.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:11:18

Yeah, I have a template ordinance that is also... it's a simplified version of an ordinance that is working its way through the City of LA and also the Bronx and the City of New York. So this is a very modified but well-vetted Ours is a much simpler ordinance, obviously because we number one don't have a zoo here and we're only speaking about elephants. But that would be a question certainly for City Attorney Summers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:11:52

I think with the model in hand, we could prepare it expeditiously.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:11:55

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:11:55

you. And then maybe during public comment, Dale Hanson, you could talk about how we banned animals in circuses after we opened.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:12:03

Okay, hold on. We're still on questions so just to confirm, Council Member Rowe, the purpose is to give credence to the appeal?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:12:13

This purpose is to show that society is changing its views towards the captivity of animals. And it's not to give credence, but it's to give support. It's to show that there is societal change happening because when you go to court these rights especially the right of habeas corpus is all about an expansion and who now should be covered by this? It used to only be white men And it was slaves, then it was women, then it was children. So this expansive great writ of habeas corpus and that's the writ that is being used. So it is to lend support but it's also to show that society is changing and here is a city who has said we are changing. We do not believe that any longer so yeah okay.

Any other questions?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:13:05

Yeah I do have a question you mentioned Why not other animals? Let's say giraffe or lion or something like that. Why aren't we addressing and insisting upon sanctuary-like conditions? I did read on the internet that there is an international Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:13:50

It's mostly that the scientific data that they have and the degree to which this has been in the New York courts for six years, so they have amicus briefs that are from here to eternity. So that's why it is in its own way timely but Councilmember Lange and I talked about this is not the end, this is only the beginning And once you can start coming up with all of the kinds of scientific evidence, you have to put it together though. I mean and then you have to make a case and with the elephants it's all been done right? So that's the problem. They're doing it with whales and Lolita just died and that was a 20 year battle to get her out of an aquarium So it's happening with these animals.

Ecuador has enshrined in their constitution rights of nature, so this is just a start for us and it seems to me to be Small enough but large enough and it's simple enough to move through because the ordinance already exists and It will end up in the California Supreme Court as a Statement of I'm not sure what they're gonna call it. You know, I mean, I assume they will they'll say the city of Ojai has has done this you know And that will lend credence to it so Yeah, I mean the same organization has fought for the freedom of chimpanzees in New York. They could not get to the high court for whatever reason that was.

You know they have the evidence around it but like I said this is really just the start this is not in any way complete or the end we need to figure out as a city and as a society within this city where we want to go with this and that's not really That's going to require a little bit of outreach, you know, to bring everybody together and figure it out. So that's why it's just timely, right? And it's the Fresno Zoo so it's within our sphere and the suit is already going to the California Supreme Court. So those kinds of things make it timely.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:16:18

Let's move on to public comment. First we have Anita Cramm and then Dale Hanson.

3:16 – 3:3016 turns

CommentDale HansonProposed · by introduction3:16:30

Thank you for bringing this issue. Elephants are scorched in my heart. I worked in zoos for 23 and a half years, I've been out for about 20 years now. My last two years of zoo work, I worked elephants. My last two years of keeper work, I worked elephants. When I moved into management curatorial to major zoos, I had to be proficient in shooting a rifle that would kill an elephant, a rhino, a polar bear, a gorilla.

If I had had, God forbid, I would have ever had to do that. I did not. I am thankful for that. That bullet would go for two miles in the city of Chicago and the city of Phoenix if someone missed their target. That's a tragedy. One of the tragedies of elephants in captivity. This still weighs on my conscience that these animals are kept. You can't replicate a habitat for an elephant in captivity, there should be no breeding programs except in countries of origin.

Any elephant, there should be no additions We should only have elephants that are currently in captivity. I would be careful about accredited sanctuary standards, even. I think Ojai should go above and beyond that. And they are highly intelligent, very complex social structures. We don't even understand it. They communicate at vibrational levels that humans cannot hear.

It's just such a tragedy, such a tragedy. Elephants used to be chained at night all night long? I mean, I have to say one of my most frightening encounters in my zoo experience was with an elephant but I had to do my job at the time which i'm not proud of but it's just something that should not happen Why elephants? They're special. They're big, they're strong. They have to be dominated in a situation to keep them intact in a captive environment. If they're ever in a case where a visitor to the zoo is or anywhere in a community you know is at risk the elephant will be killed because and you talk about breeding programs male elephants go through a condition called must When the females are in heat, they get crazy. When I first started in zoo work, this is a long time ago, decades ago, elephant keeping was one of the 10 most dangerous jobs in the United States because keepers got killed and that's the condition, that's the situation.

They don't belong in captivity so and I will say to any community member out there who doesn't understand this if you have ever visited a zoo You've been a part of this. You've given your money to support the situation. Tax dollars for any governmental zoo, your tax dollars go to it. I was so happy when I moved to Ojai, no zoo. Thank you. Thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:19:37

you

CommentDale HansonProposed · by introduction3:19:38

Anita.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:19:38

Next we have Dale Hanson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:19:44

I live in the city of Ojai, just for the record. I really appreciate the last speaker. I couldn't do that job either. You know today when people in my office said what's with the elephant? Aren't any elephants in Ojai and they were laughing about it and I tried to explain this is not about an elephant in Ojai although we used to have one. I visited Tara when she was here but It's, for me this issue is about the difference between animal welfare and animal rights. Animal welfare is very weak you know it's very easy to get by anything that supposedly is protecting the animal but animal rights is different and that's what I'd like to see Ojai be a part of this ordinance Councilwoman Rule has brought forward. I think it's really important It makes a statement Oh, I can make a statement that is statewide and maybe eventually countrywide because we need to respect these animals We need to give them their rights the last speaker pointed out the reasons why they are intelligent and And like you pointed out for whales, I mean people are starting to wake up to what we need to do to be decent human beings.

They have a long ways to go but I appreciate your bringing this forward and I really hope you approve it. Thank you so much.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:21:07

Thank You Dale any comments online?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role3:21:10

Yes mayor we have two raised hands first We'll have Becky followed by Larry Steingold Becky you have the floor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:21:19

Thank you, Weston. Again I'm not really prepared to speak but I will do my best to express my views on this topic. Let me just preface my remarks by saying that I am not at all against...I'm not at all saying that elephants should not have rights, are not worthy of protection or any of the rest of it. But I am one of those people who would say we have a host of animals, wild animals living right here in our own backyard wilderness and we cannot assume that they too are not very complex creatures with rights to survive and thrive unmolested by humans.

I'm all for societal change that is more inclusive of all living beings. And I would say that also includes things beyond animals, trees and wild rivers and other things that have a right to be wild and free. Rather than establishing animal sanctuaries, perhaps we need to acknowledge that we are the interlopers into their habitat. And it's incumbent on us to consider the rights of nature rather than considering everything only from a human-centered viewpoint.

No wild animals should be held in captivity in Ojai or anywhere, in my opinion. Other than those who may be temporarily in need of rehabilitation or veterinary services in a qualified animal clinic where they are treated by professionals prior to being released back into the wild. And I know that sometimes it's difficult to release animals back in the wild if they've spent time with humans for too long, but those are issues that can be worked out.

But I do think that we need to support the rights of local wild animals first along with the rights of local humans over tourists and wannabe Ojai transplants. And I think that maybe rather than Working on this as an ordinance just about animals, perhaps the council should direct staff to consider expanding our concern to create an ordinance that makes Ojai City that supports sustainability and the rights of all the natural world including not only humans but also the animals, plants, rivers et cetera living in our wilderness.

All animals have a right to exist without benefit to humans. So why focus only on one species while ignoring the entire ecosystem right around us that too often we are too poised to destroy? Thank you, Becky.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role3:24:25

Next we have Larry Steingold. Larry, you have the floor.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction3:24:29

Thank you. At first, I wasn't going to say anything at all because I didn't have a clue and then I started to listen and then I started laughing. And then I didn't. And then I realized that animal rights is a wonderful thing. But you mentioned slavery. You mentioned ownership. Can I have your dog? No, you own the dog. Can I have the mayor's dog? No, she owns the dog.

How about Mr. Whitman's horse or whatever doesn't matter. You've got horse owners out there. You've got cat owners. Can i go empty their fish tanks and i'm just saying i believe i know it's a stretch and it's probably off the wall but if you get, at some point it's got to stop or it doesn't and nobody owns a pet. But that's where the end is or it's get rid of meat whatever it doesn't matter but call it what it is okay?

First it's the elephants now it's wild animals now it's nature. If a dog is on a leash who wants to take a dump on my yard Whose fault is it? The owners or the dogs? Do I sue the dog? What do I use as an, you know what I'm saying. So I mean it's not just an easy thing and it sounds silly and maybe I'm crazy and you probably think I am okay. I just think that if you give one all of a sudden hey how about the guy's horse down the street does the horse have rights he wants a bigger stable okay how do you know he kicked the door down Okay, I know. I should do stand-up comedy. Anyway thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:26:30

Thank you Larry.

CommentJake WallProposed · by introduction3:26:30

That's

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role3:26:31

all on Zoom Mayor.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:26:32

Okay we will move on to council discussion who would like to begin?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:26:35

Can i just make a comment so Larry made the slippery slope argument. For this particular instance, we're talking about rights and it's a very high bar for rights and so while I understand the slippery slope argument, it's highly nuanced and I'm happy to have the discussion with him any time. It would take hours for me to explain How the slippery slope argument works in this particular case and how it doesn't work But I understand the slippery slope argument, and it will come up. It is something that we have to think about And it will come up into Becky's comments. I just wanted to say that I Think that's what we mentioned here about you know moving this forward to You know a more Expanding our scope. But right now, I don't think that it is my place or anyone else's at this particular dais to make that.

I think it's a community decision and we have so many people in this community who are interested in this, who have given deep thought to it. The Chumash and the indigenous people who, you know, this is... You know, the rights of nature is fundamental to them. So I don't think that we can actually do this right now and rights are very complicated. It's not a law, you know, like a welfare law. So to that point, I really appreciate everybody's comments and Anita thank you so much for your experience in being able to speak to this. This is the first step and then we have a community discussion of where we want to go after that. That is what the nature of this ordinance was for, so thank you.

Councilmember Lange

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:28:39

yeah, so I I support this ordinance and I think that it makes a statement that To council member rules point. It makes a statement that we really are in Moving forward in the conversation of the rights of nature. There's a lot more that needs to be developed in terms of how local municipalities handle rights of nature and like, to respond to some of Larry's questions.

And those are those are points of inquiry that I am That I'm researching. I know councilmember rule is researching and I've had people also asked me what about you know? why elephants why and I think that there's That it's because it puts us on the map as being a part of a bigger movement that's taking place and it says that the city of Ojai is is making a stand for, you know, for the freedom of animals that have traditionally been kept in captivity. And I am sure that over time there are going to be more animals that are added to this list but I think it makes a real good statement about who we are And what we stand for.

And I would be open to bringing up at a future time the rights of nature as an overall discussion topic.

3:30 – 3:373 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:30:18

I just want to support what you two councilwomen so brilliantly stated, thank you. Councilmember Whitman?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:30:26

Yeah, so I don't know if I support it until I see the ordinance is kind of my first comment. So I'm not going to spend a lot of time discussing it but I will say that I have been struggling with the idea that this is like a thing thoughtful law professor would bring up in class and have you discuss the difference between passing laws that are designed to prohibit destructive damaging behaviors Versus make passing laws that make a declaration about I kept, I don't think this is the right word but I keep the word that comes into my head is like metaphysics and whether you know we are A body that adjudicates those types of things. I know that if you went into court with this issue, you would need to have...

So part of my problem is that and this was kind of hard for me to necessarily grapple with but we've got Centuries of laws that and and they are still on the books today. Let's say that you know Persons can own animals And that there are ownership rights that attach with that Now I do understand the concept of potentially carving out elephants as An animal that you can't own And I wouldn't have any problem passing an ordinance such as that, that you cannot own an elephant in Ojai.

I am concerned and I think I just have to leave it to Matt to figure this out whether our body Should be making that type of it's almost like a spiritual. Conclusion and maybe it's not wrong that we make a spiritual conclusion but it bothers you know it kind of. Just not 100% comfortable with doing anything other than doing the, you know, protective thing. We will protect these animals.

That seems like our role and I guess I'll have to spend some time between now and whenever this comes back thinking about our role as, you know, declaring those types of more metaphysical issues.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:33:40

Can I make a quick statement, if I could? So I did send you the appellate brief and also the dissenting opinion of the High Court of New York. And all of those issues are also broached and so I think that would give you some sort of moral compass as to how to think about this But quite honestly, all animals are considered things and they have no rights. And this is the first type of ordinance that would say in fact because of habeas corpus being used for an animal they're no longer a thing. They now have legal personhood, which allows them all kinds of things. We know corporations have legal personhood. There's all kinds of things that have legal personhood but what does not have legal personhood is an elephant, is a chimpanzee, is a whale.

So this is meant to apply a habeas corpus which is the great writ, which is a right and once you do that, you change fundamentally how the law looks at animals and that's what's really important about this And I'm also happy to have that discussion. I also have written educational materials around this, to explain all of this and so I would hope that you would actually delve because it really isn't a metaphysical, it's a very clear and real discussion and point of law. It's habeas corpus being expanded outside of the normal realm of humans to include animals because all of the qualities that have allowed The Great Writ to expand over the years from the time of Somerset and, you know, slavery in the 1700s in England All of the rationalizations and reasons that have been used to expand the Great Writ to include people, we now find because of science, because of our understanding they're now included in animals.

This is what this whole case is about, is can we now say that animals have personhood? And by the way, personhood doesn't mean human hood. Personhood which would give them rights and that's what this is about. To me it's very tangible, it's very real and it is a sea change in how we look and how we treat animals as well as How we look at ourselves and how we look at the society in which we live. So I understand you are not the first, the only or anyone to have this kind of argument. This has been 30 years in the making. The lawyer who finally argued this case in front of the New York Supreme Court 28 years ago, I thought it would take him 30 years to be able to get in front of the high court. So he beat it by two years.

So there's just all kinds of things around that but I don't want to minimize your sort Struggle with this. I definitely do not, but I'm happy to have a conversation with you any time. I'm happy to give you all the documentation in an attempt to give you some clarity on where this actually sits and I can go through history around animal rights that start with Pythagoras all the way down to Cesar Chavez. All of them citing animal rights as the fundamental and core belief of what makes us human, how we treat animals. So anyway that having been said I know I've spoken a lot this is a passion of mine it's been a passion of mine since I was driving around in northern Vermont and heard the lawyer who argued this case was going to be in upstate New York and I drove from northern Vermont to upstate New York to hear this case being held so I will leave it at that

3:37 – 3:5131 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:37:36

I'm going to make a comment. I appreciate you putting this on the agenda, all three of you. And this has also been a passion of mine since birth. Thank you. And animal rights, the movement has been around a long, long time. I did bring the book, of course, because in 1975 Peter Singer published Animal Liberation and he's not He's a philosopher. He is part of the bioethics department at Princeton University now, and it's not about loving animals so much as the philosophy, and he really breaks it down.

The whole question in my mind is do animals suffer? And it's a great read and I read this in a night in the 80s and became a vegan overnight because I couldn't argue with him. So there's been a ton of court cases, and I think that this is an opportunity for us to make a stand just to support the appeal and of course we should include all animals I think this is the beginning from what it seems like, and Ojai has an opportunity to be a real beacon of sustainability and compassion. And I think animal rights and the rights of nature are the next movement. It's happening already as we speak, and I think it'd be a great thing for us to support. So thank you for bringing this to our attention.

And I'm sure there are things to work out in it, but I think supporting that appeal would be a really great thing for us to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:39:16

I want

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:39:16

to make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:39:17

a recommendation. Perhaps the city website and the Ojai Valley News website could have the documentation that Leslie, Council Member Bruhl provided us. It's excellent your documentation and there was a cover letter to help the public understand why this is so important. Yeah, thank you make a motion.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:39:41

I will make a motion that we ask Council City Attorney Summers to bring back an ordinance that supports the right of bodily liberty to elephants in Ojai.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:40:00

I'll second it. Okay, should we just do all in favor? Do we need a roll call? Okay, all in favor aye

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:40:12

I first of all want to thank all of you for not pointing out during that discussion that I'm the former city manager of Fresno.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:40:19

I know, I was going to! I thought of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:40:21

it. Is it Anita? When you salve your conscience about whatever it was that you were talking about add me in there because I was the manager of Fresno and used to be a member of the zoo And I will when they turn this in at the Supreme Court with the statement from the city of Ojai They can put a little asterisk in there that says the City Manager of Fresno is now the interim City Manager of Ojia But more to the point, People ask me why I keep doing what I do because I'm old and ought to be stopped have stopped by now, but And I always say the same thing people hire me theoretically because of my experience But every time I go into a city, I end up learning so much more than I had going in the door.

And I will tell you a week ago, I would never have imagined we'd have had such an intellectual discussion on something that was so far off my radar screen as this topic. And it's been a rewarding week in that regard, and in some ways disturbing. And I thank you all for that.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:41:50

Thank you.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposed · by role3:41:51

And I'll say Mayor to any public that's interested, all materials received to the dais after the start of the meeting will be included on our city website tomorrow on the public comment section.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:42:01

I also want to just thank my fellow council people for the support across the board it means the world to me so thank you so very much

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:42:12

We'll move on to council member reports. Anything to report out?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:42:15

I do.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:42:16

Council Member

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:42:16

Lange. First of all, I want to thank Ellen Sherwood whose brownies delighted us in this really long, long meeting. They're keto, vegan, paleo gluten-free, vegan gluten free. They are divine. And so if anyone needs brownies or any other baked goods, Ellen Sherwood. She gave them to the mayor and the mayor shared them with us.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:42:44

She had heard that I loved her vegan gluten-free brownies, so she baked a whole box for all of us and brought them today. Thank you, Ellen. You're the best much appreciated So sweet. Thank you for saying that and

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:42:58

then I have two other two other things one is Thanks to our wonderful librarian Ron I am going to be reading my children's book my newly published children's book at an event on the 30th and as for children And there's an activity that goes along with it where kids can make suncatchers, really cute star-shaped suncatchers. So that's happening... I don't remember the time. It's either—I think it's at 11 a.m., but it's in the morning at the library and I'll be reading As Above, So Below my children's book. I'll bring my grandkids! Congratulations! Thank

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:43:40

you so much!

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:43:43

Yeah, I've got a couple things to say First while Betsy was busy thanking people for being on top of the earthquake and the flooding She didn't mention herself Because I did call her and ask what is going on with the homeless people. And I know that Betsy was instrumental in making sure that Kent Hall was open for people who wanted to be out of the rain.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:44:16

Thanks Andy, it was a group effort and I'm grateful to everybody.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:44:20

So last week or maybe it was two weeks ago someone was putting stuff on social media about the idea that we've got a problem with drinking water in the Arbolada And so I called Casitas and I just want to report what they reported to me, which is that first of all the drinking water in the Arbolada comes from a pumping station on Grand Avenue. So they're not pumping the water that's there and then the next thing they said was that if the concern is that the pipes I guess I should back up on why there would be a drinking water concern and that is that because we had such a heavy rain year for the first time in 13 years.

We've had this artesian phenomena where water kind of pushes itself up from the ground. And it ends up pooling and spreading around, and there have been some readings by—I'm not sure exactly who's taking the readings, maybe the sanitation district—but of high bacteria levels So what I was told by Casitas is that first of all, they meticulously test the water quality of the water that they purvey.

They were kind of wondering why people weren't calling them if they thought there was an issue But they also said that the pipes that run, you know, through the ground to your house are regulated such that they have to have sufficient pressure in them so there never is any type of intrusion. from the outside. So what I got back from Casitas is that, the Casitas Municipal Water District is that you shouldn't be concerned about your drinking water quality at all.

Mark and I have talked about getting the county to advise us on what we should be saying about that water seepage issue and what we should be telling homeowners. And I don't think we've gotten a response back yet, but Mark has been following that issue and James was before. In fact he even had brought it up as one of our agenda items at one point to say do you authorize me to spend time working with the county on tracking down this issue?

So that I'm just for the sake of anybody in the public who's concerned about their drinking water. You can check with Casitas if you want but they assured me that it's good.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:47:39

Thank you. I just want to thank Matt Summers for this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:47:43

excellent article on the Supreme Court Voting Rights Act case And in case you missed it, there's hope that maybe Ojai will return to being elected. All of us will again be elected at large. There's going to be a decision 9-25? September 25th?

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:48:12

Between now and then yeah. September 25 is the deadline for the state Supreme Court to make a decision on the Santa Monica CVRA case and once we have that decision we'll update the council on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:48:22

Yeah. So there's hope, that's a ray of hope and then are you going to or someone is going to alert the public that we're having a special meeting on council priorities?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:48:35

That's city manager's report right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:48:38

now. Is it my turn?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:48:41

Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:48:42

yeah. I have two things I want to bring up. One is we are going to have a priorities discussion on August 30th. We set four o'clock as the starting time. It's not that we don't want public input. We always want public input. We live with and on public input But this is a workshop really for the City Council to give us feedback on priorities. Hopefully, we're not going to spend three hours listening to everybody's ideas before we get around to 20 minutes of discussion with the City Council. I mean it's really intended to be a workshop for the City Council to talk about where you want to place your priorities and And I think it'll be very worthwhile. I hope the public watches, the public can come and attend. We're going to do it at Kent Hall.

It sets up nicely there. We can do television there and we think that will be a good place for it. So that's coming up and I hope people are interested in that. The other thing I want to bring up is just a question. And I say in this because if I say that, I want to make it clear I'm not asking for a vote because it's not on the agenda. But a question has come to me about whether or how to go about a council fee waiver proposal. The Foster Park? Do you all know where Foster Park is?

Good, because I don't know how to tell you. has had damage first from the Thomas fire and then with the rains this last year. And they're trying to raise funds to do some improvements in their community, it's not in the city but they are holding a fundraising concert at Libby Bowl in October I think it's October 7th that they have reserved And they've asked for a fee waiver. I have no idea how to process a fee waiver.

I can put it on the City Council agenda if that's the way it's done, if it's what $700 is what we're talking about. Well, $700 plus three dollars a ticket that would be their seeking to have waived. And I don't know if that's something you authorize the city manager to do or if it's a put on the agenda type item but, I'm asking your input.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:51:22

Can I add one other thing to that? So this group does have a 501c3 fiscal sponsor so all of the donation would go through their fiscal sponsor. It's the community foundation and so that would meet our

3:51 – 3:5639 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:51:45

So do we need to put this on a future agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:51:48

One one approach if I could jump in would be if there's no opposition to it Then staff can use the authority already inherent To proceed with the proposal of the fee waiver at the staff level because I would assume the amount at stake is less than city management Authority, if there's opposition or concern then they could come back on a future council agenda

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:06

That's good. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:52:07

so

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:52:07

my concern Would be that We make sure that whatever, I don't know what costs are associated with putting on a concert that the city might absorb.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:52:27

Part of the deal would be that all out-of-pocket expenses would be paid for and they still have to provide event insurance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:52:37

Yeah, that sounds

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:52:37

about right and the damage. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:52:40

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:52:40

That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:52:41

my recollection that when we did special things they did have to pay out-of-pocket there were conditions Because others will ask yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:52:52

and I and I would recommend that whatever out of pocket expenses there are that go to Matt LeVere with the county. That maybe he can find some county funds to assist this project? They're

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:53:13

working with the county.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:53:14

The group is

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:53:15

working with the county, yeah.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.773:53:17

So if we did have... my concern is if we did have expenses then we would probably have to do something more formal but I think If we're clear, then we're good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:53:26

I appreciate it. It would've been nice if I'd have put it on the agenda previously. We got a little mix up on a couple things and so I just wanted to raise it and I really appreciate that suggestion on how to deal with it. And we'll deal with that that way. Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:53:43

Okay. Well, are we on future? Yeah, but we're gonna can we wait to talk about those that are priority workshop?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:53:51

That was my question. So at the priority workshop do is the agenda already set for this first September meeting?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:54:01

There are agenda items that we have identified for the first September meeting, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:54:09

Okay so if there's room then we can you know Larry Larry Stangel is unrelenting we have to get the 25 mile speed limit and all those you know but we're going to discuss it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:54:24

at the... We can put it on to discuss I have A lot of questions for you all about that issue. I've got great reservations that a community can set at 25 mile an hour across the board speed limit. Hopefully, you don't think you can't. Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:54:42

you can. You can't on 150. Okay, I'll research it. We've had this discussion before. And also, I believe there's a new state law

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:54:54

There are new state laws, but it doesn't give you the ability to set a 25-mile an hour speed limit in the entire community.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:55:01

We're talking about residential neighborhoods.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:55:04

You already can if it's below a certain size. He's going to tell me. I was just going to say

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:55:10

that at the priorities workshop the council can set the timeline for when that comes back which could be the first meeting in September or a future meeting and plainly the matter needs further study.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:55:21

And we can give you cities where it's being done.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:55:24

Listen, I know this issue. Believe me. Okay. I've been doing this for 45 years. Every city I've ever been in has talked about this issue. I do understand that there's a new law and I understand what it restricts and what it doesn't restrict.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:55:39

Okay, well I just want to thank everyone for a fruitful and civil and harmonious meeting. And we got through six agenda items. So thank you all for being here thanks for hanging out. And we have a closed session so we're not adjourned. Right, we have one final

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56:00

closed session item with the indulgence of the

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:56:02

council which

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56:03

may be quick,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:56:04

but we have to ask everyone to leave right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56:06

that would be the request and I'll just note City of Ojai, the U.S. Forest Service at all district court case as noted in the agenda for the case number and reportable action is possible and if there is reportable action it will be reported out next time.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:56:24

Okay alright thank you all thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:56:27

Thank you for such a great meeting.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:56:30

Thank you. Great work you guys. Bye thank you okay so we will adjourn to closed session? Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56:37

and I believe we can take it from here.