BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 November 14, 2023

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:004 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:00

Good evening. Call the order, please. Could everyone please take a seat and come to quiet?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:04

Meeting time.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:05

Can we have the roll call, please, Weston?

Roll call — called by Betsy Stix · 1 under review
Show transcript
Yes, Mayor. Mayor Stixx? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Here. Council Member Ruhl? Here Council Member Lange? Here Council Member Whitman?

Thank you, Weston. And welcome everyone to the November 14th 2023 meeting of the Ojai City Council. Would you please say the pledge?

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:29

Yes ma'am. Welcome community! Everyone please stand. Place your right hand over your heart. Ready? Begin.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:47

with liberty and justice for all

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:52

Thank you so much, Weston.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role0:53

And before we have approval of the agenda I'm going to be reading a short statement. Last night our interim city manager Mark Scott resigned. We thank him for his service and all his hard work on behalf of our community. We are grateful for his time here and wish him all the best in his new adventure. As mayor, I have appointed Assistant City Manager Carl Alameda to be acting city manager subject to ratification by the council at the meeting on November 28th.

On November 28th, the Council will consider the next steps for the City Manager recruitment including the next Interim City Manager. I would like to reassure our community my council colleagues and our wonderful city staff that i'm confident in the continued operations of the city Our strong staff is the root of Ojai's success, and I look forward to continuing to work together to maintain and improve our community.

I'm grateful for the staff service and commitment to Ojai, and all the hard work in the chambers, behind the scenes, and out in the town. Thank you Mr. Alameda for stepping in as our acting city manager. And with that, is there a motion to approve the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:17

I'll move to approve.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:19

And a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19

I'll second

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:20

it. All in favor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:22

Aye.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:22

Thank you, wonderful and Mr. City Attorney do you have a report out from last night's closed session?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:29

Yes thank you Madam Mayor. Last night the city council met in closed session and considered four of the five items they considered items one regarding anticipatory litigation related to a transactional occurrence the city's consideration of a pending housing development proposed by Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation for 318-320 Bryant Street Second item two, consideration of a pending housing development proposed by Ojai Bungalows LP Greenhawk LLC the Becker Group Inc.

for 312 West Aliso 412 Mallory Way 107 North Ventura and 304 South Montgomery and 510 East Ojai. And third anticipated litigation related to pending housing development proposed by Ojai Kuyama Church LLP Ojai Maricopa Church One LLP And Ojai Maricopa Church to LLP for 1400 and 1450 Maricopa Highway. The council also considered existing litigation, the case name simply Ojai v. City of Ohio, Ventura County Superior Court case number stated as on the agenda. For those four items the council provided direction to staff and myself, the acting city manager and the community development director Our outside housing council, Sunny Sultani with the firm Elcher and Winter to bring back information to the council regarding the litigation risks and options inherent in those developments.

And to continue the city's processing of all of those development applications as required by law without delay, and to open dialogue with the developers on each of the applicable projects regarding potential future options. The council provided direction in the existing litigation case to proceed as required by law And on item five, the council deferred consideration of that one regarding public employee appointment and public employment related to the city manager and interim city manager to the November 28th meeting. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:23

All right we have, we'll move on to presentations. We have a presentation from Kathy Nolan and Betsy Van Light of the Ojai Valley Green Coalition and they will present on the Community Service Grant Project City Hall Campus Master Plan Year One Community Engagement Report so thank you very much Betsy and Kathy for being here take it away

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:51

Council members, staff. You just introduced us so I don't have to say my name over again but we are here representing the Ojai Valley Green Coalition and we want to thank you for the opportunity to present and share the outcomes of our community engagement portion of the one year for the Master Planning of the Acres City Hall Campus. And this was through the past city of Ojai Community Service Grant Program from 2022 And I'm sure all of you received our report and there's a lot of details in here. So tonight we're just going to give you kind of a broad overview, and then of course if there's any questions afterwards.

But the services we intended to provide in this three-to-four year project were a source and access for information, functioning systems for education and outreach, and a place for all of this to happen. After conversations with city leadership, we understood that our community needed better access to information about how they can take impactful action toward greater resilience and a regenerative way of life here in our valley.

We proposed that we could create a hub or center including a coalition of our local nonprofit organizations to optimize, collaborate and to create synergies. And that by establishing a location on the City Hall campus, whether in the help of Ojai Building which I know we continue to ask for and we did ask for a lot. And on the site as well as creating a virtual calendar either on the city's website or our Green Coalition website and through community engagement and input, we would collect information as to what was needed to create the hub or center, share that with council In the hopes of moving forward and applying that information to support a master plan for the City Hall campus.

Your fiscal support through the grant allowed the community to actively participate in the community engagement process for phase one, year one. So our funding was just for that first-year community engagement. We achieved this by one, we conducted an effective collaboration training and that was more internal. But the reason we did that it was to kind of create the ground rules of how we would and could effectively engage with the community.

I'm No matter what their opinions were, we took them down and we wanted to make sure that they were heard. So we also conducted an online survey that included a series of questions and there were even spaces for people to write in creatively whatever they wanted to so it wasn't just like a yes or no or pick A B C or D. There was an option for them to provide input and that ran through July 31st of 2023 We then provided group and private site tours of the eight-acre campus, which not only included walking the site but sharing background and historical information and having a Q&A and social time with whoever attended.

We then conducted a series of three World Cafe style workshops where participants were provided a broad scope question and then worked together in groups to answer questions and provide creative input. We then tabulated all of that data to create our final report. Betsy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed8:37

That picture that's on the front of the report is a really wonderful, whimsical drawing of the 8-acre property done by our own local artist, Christine Brennan. Shout out to Christine! And I'm going to be talking about the themes. Really, the heart of the report are the emergent themes from all of the input we got. You'll have to look carefully, you know if you download it or get a print copy. There's wonderful little pictures that kind of exemplify quite a few of the themes.

So here's really, in a nutshell, taking all of the comments from survey, from workshop and from other times that we talked with people as well. What were the things that kept coming up over and over again that kind of fit together? So the first theme is the supporting and connecting to the natural world. We have an amazing campus, we have trees and open land and gardens and really access for people to be able to connect and to be part of the natural world. And that came up probably more than any other type of comment Another theme was to repurpose the existing buildings, including the old carriage house. There was a tremendous amount of interest in that old carriage house and a few of us got to see the inside of it.

Using different sections of the site to offer a wide variety of activities. And we do have, I mean if you look at that site it is broken up into different areas that lend themselves to different things. So just as a few examples of activities that people brought up one was definitely pickleball but there were comments about making art Doing spiritual ceremonies, doing yoga, doing meditation, doing storytelling. A whole range of things that we could do together as a community.

One of the themes was inviting youth to be centrally part of everything we did. It was really a hope that this would

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:10 – 0:1715 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed10:53

bring forward children and young people to learn, to be part of things and even to be in leadership roles. There was a theme of refining and extending the existing paths and trails so that we're better connected within the site, but also connecting potentially all the way to Creek Road or down to Ojai Avenue. And then there were a lot of comments that were about doing a variety of nature-based and sustainability educational activities that truly tap into the richness of the place that we live in.

There were many comments, another theme was about rejuvenating and tending the demonstration garden area which has a long history And finally, there was definitely a theme about finding ways to better care for those in the tent encampment which was expanding during the entire time we were doing our work. So in summary, we feel like people were telling us that the city campus property has the potential to be sort of an essential ecological hub for the community of Ojai, a place for children and adults to enjoy and learn about our ecosystem together Think how fortunate we are to live in a place that has a campus like this, that offers a refuge for humans and non-humans alike.

So let's not squander this opportunity. Let's really move forward to bring some of the ideas expressed to fruition. And so Kathy is going to talk about the more practical what our next steps or recommendations

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed12:35

All right, so in closing, consider giving the site a descriptive name such as Ojai Ecology Hub. This can be done many different or numerous ways. The council could do it. We could go out to the community and have a contest or something fun but it would be nice to give it a name. If you decided you want to move forward, we'd love to get an MOU with the city.

We know that the site survey of the entire property needs to be completed and to identify the actual boundaries. Assure that we are in compliance with the Smith-Hopson deed so anything that we did on the property would be compliant with that And then we did receive a wonderful gift, and we have the whole report included in our report. And that was a tree survey that was donated to the city to the value of about $10,000.

All the trees are identified and assessed. And there are actually some hazardous trees that are out on the property, so I'm hoping that the city will take it to the Public Works Department if they haven't and make sure that they look at that information and any hazards are addressed because there are a lot of people, of course we know living and using the campus.

Another immediate thing would be to start mini projects in the garden just to keep the community alive. And as Betsy mentioned, we had so many people volunteer that said you know hey I'll dig a hole or if I was a teacher I could teach a class but people who actually want to come out and be involved and volunteer. And then we wrote on there, determine an appropriate response to the tent encampment.

And I hope thankfully that this has been started. It sounds like we have a really good task force and the city is trying to figure out some solutions. And then I just wanted to give a big thank you once again to council, to staff who worked with us while we were doing this project, and to the entire community for everyone who participated. It all made it happen so. Thank you. And then we're open to any questions if you have any. OK,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role14:44

thank you so much Kathy and Betsy really appreciate it. Thank you for loving our campus so much and putting so much time and attention in and also talking to so many community members that's beautiful. So thank you. Any questions or comments?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8414:59

I just wanted to also thank you. I had the opportunity to go to one of the World Cafe events and it was incredible to be in a room with people brainstorming all the Potentialities for that property and it was really inspiring And what was interesting was how many? Of our ideas even though we were sitting at different tables and all coming from different places how many of our ideas aligned and related to one another And I loved the way that you organized that process in addition to the opportunity that you provided for the community itself. So thank you so, so much for your leadership in this effort.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:34

You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8615:42

Council member, thank you. So from what I understand have you submitted like a next steps proposal yet? Or what if we did want to move forward with The mini next steps until we get a better sense of the space and how it's going to play out. What would be, would you submit something? Would you like to I mean, how would we get in dialogue with you about that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:14

Well we actually did submit something and that was

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8616:16

several

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:18

months ago. And we actually proposed a couple things, one that the city get the survey completed and we would help orchestrate that with the local server because we know who had done the past work There was that and then we actually put in a proposal for a mini grant or a small project, and that would be in the demonstration garden. And that would be to keep the community involved and actually to help do some cleanup which is big. And then just having a presence in the landscape, in the garden just kind of helps create boundaries and engagement with the community

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed16:57

But you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:57

can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed16:57

tell

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed16:58

us too if there's a way we should yes We're flexible.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8617:05

Well, perhaps we can speak to our acting city manager and see if something bubbles up from What you've what you've proposed because it would be unfortunate after this year's long work if it were to just sort of dissipate for lack of You know activity or engagement or follow through even if it were minimal follow-through of just keeping the community That's been built over this last year together so We can we can work on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed17:37

Yeah, of course Okay, thank you so much

0:17 – 0:235 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role17:49

We will move on to commission Reports we have one from chair Smitty for the Arts Commission and then chair Aikens from HPC

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:01

All right, thank you guys let's have some fun. You know it's going to be upbeat I Have a painting to show you guys okay? And if any of you, I was hoping they could maybe put it on the screen too. Can you see? If you remember your art history class, you'll remember Marc Chagall. Marc Chagall was a Russian artist and Impressionist 100 years ago. He moved to Paris early on, but always loved his former Russia.

Mayor Betsy approached me a few months ago and said, one of the residents in the encampment here outside City Hall had approached her and said I have this beautiful painting that's worth millions than the original would be. And she came a few times and finally Betsy says Smitty can you check this out? You know I said okay I'll check it out so I got a hold of the painting. I'm not going to use her name, I don't have that permission right now. But I researched it a little, got hold of the painting and heard this story.

This is a print. It was bought at the thrift store, The Help of Ojai Thrift Store for $15. And the owner asked that, you know, I'd like to sell it and hang it in City Hall. Sell it and get some money. So I scheduled through her social worker at the help of Ojai to he or she or her. Their social worker at the help of Ojai to have a look at it. And I immediately, even to a musician, I recognized immediately it was just a print. In fact when I turned it over, it said IKEA on the back and I noticed that...

And you can still get a Chagall. It's called Flying Over. Flying over town, OK? Very impressionist. And it was his town in what is now Belarus and his hometown as a very famous painting. It's at a museum in Moscow right now. And it's one of the most copied forged paintings that there are as well. But I'm curious because whenever I frame something, whatever used to be in the frame, I leave in the frame, in the back.

So I open the back of it, OK. And because I have some Ukrainian war refugees living at my house right now, I recognize Cyrillic and handwritten signature. But as I pulled it out, I noted that it wasn't signed on the Shigall. It was just signed on another painting that was underneath it that's an original artwork. Let me show that to you. This is where I use my gloves.

It's mainly for drama. The signature says Vladimir Makhaev, and this is the painting. It's original oil, and I was able to run down the... Can you see it over there? I was able to run down the artist. $100. Isn't that delightful? It's called Love

GuestSue WilliamsonCity ManagerProposedself-stated21:59

Triangle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:09

It's called Love Triangle, it's signed by his name and called Love Triangle in Russian and it's just delightful a woman with her burrow and her kitty cat and that's a little love triangle so I did a little research on the artist. research on the artist, and I was able actually to find him and contact him. He lives in Crimea, kind of Ukrainian sort of right now, and he's a working artist. He's of some renown. He is known for exactly what this is, oil on paper rather than oil on canvas, and he's totally influenced by Chagall. In fact when I told him His response, I asked him how did we come across this? He said I have no idea. We've had auctions in America but he's never even been and he said I just want you to let the owner know that I'm honored to share a frame with the great Marc Chagall.

So, I just wanted to share a little story of art here in Ojai and tell you my plan was...my hope. I wrote a little pitch to the media trying to find a journalist or someone in the art world that would get ahold of this and we'll see what happens but I would love to get some media attention. It needs cleaned and framed properly And I would like maybe the city to consider doing that, maybe hanging it here or at the museum.

And maybe a philanthropist art collector will buy it and it will certainly help the owner of the painting out a lot. So that's it.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role23:54

Well thank you.

0:23 – 0:328 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:58

And with that, I have earned two minutes. Thank you, Chair

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role24:03

Smitty. Great story.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:04

I have two minutes. Just because the commissioner criteria is on the agenda tonight, I just wanted to offer that I was very I was very pleased to see that in the draft one that you have now, you gave us on the Arts Commission the flexibility to have five to seven commissioners and the terms aren't tied to an election cycle. The mayor and a council person, the way you guys select it will work with the chair to select new members.

I just want to talk a little bit about the residency requirement and make a pitch for this a couple different ways. The arguments that I want to make just to kind of give some examples.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role24:53

Just one, this is an agenda item that comes later Chair Smitty so can you wait and save your comments until that item comes up? Or you want to go home don't you? Can you yeah because uh, you know, we're really supposed to stick to the agenda items when it comes up Okay, if you can wait I will do that. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:14

The only other thing I don't want to say is that the mural jury met today and uh Is going to be sending approval for the mural? Uh Through the mural ordinance to the commission meeting thursday night thursday night. We'll also be having The presentations by the grant applicants and I hope you or any of you, it's the best meeting of the year that we have. And I hope maybe I'll come to that so thank you for your

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role25:37

time. Thank you for all you do for us. Thank you. Next we have Chair Akins from the Historic Preservation Commission. And thank you for helping our community member, Chair Smitty.

CommentBrian AkinsProposedself-stated26:26

Hello, I'm Brian Akins. I'm here on a Historic Preservation Commission chair report and I too was gonna lump the two items together but I'll be back. So first thing I want to do is I do wanna congratulate the Green Coalition on the efforts they've done. I went to an early meeting where they put big maps out on each of the tables And I went to the maps and I drew three red circles on those maps. On the Carriage House, the Pickleball Court and Downtown City and said these are landmarked other than that enjoy yourselves and they have just done a fabulous job.

I am, I was talking to Kathy beforehand. I will tell you that the historic Carriage House Barn is mentioned amongst their own reporting and amongst the people that were participating in it. Carriage House Barn was mentioned 12 times. I like it when potential landmarks are mentioned multiple times. So as was mentioned glad that the mayor and others were able to go to the tours we're able Go to to the spooky haunted not haunted a carriage house. And so that's wonderful, too grateful in the report that as I said the carriage house was Mentioned several times in page 8 it says and Ojai Arts Commissioner overseeing education for the Commission That's Pamela growl was able to tour the old carriage house and become very excited about possibilities Gotta love that lead Later, refurbishing the Ojai City Campus Carriage House into a vibrant learning center.

I love it when we have landmarks that are used for something that doesn't take away from its status but moves us forward in enjoying them. Group five said historic barn. Chumash knowledge? Question. Events? Weddings? Halloween haunted house? Use barn events for revenue generation. Now, I'm a finance guy. I like that one too. One member of the Arts Commission created a proposal, again that's Pamela Growl. And so I would really like to thank Kathy Nolan, Betsy Van Light and Pamela Growl and they all took tours and went in there with the questions I had and came out with all of these great ideas. So congratulations to them for doing that.

I will also congratulate you on an item that we'll get to tonight and tell you that fortunately with the now having three resident commissioners as well as two non-resident commissioners, we did meet last Thursday. Sousa was probably a four hour meeting did that tour Susan was there as our liaison, as we went through and we discussed the different things at that.

In that meeting it was suggested and approved that instead of talking to it as a local downtown historic district, I got to explain the fact that we have currently a state historic district and now we're proposing a local downtown historic district and what the difference was And so the motion was made and it was agreed to that we rename that as the Ojai Civic Center Historic District. Again, civic center going back to what Libby's first intent was for the city and that will make it a lot easier to explain to others. So again that we are looking forward to well, I'll say I'll leave you on the edge of your seats and I'll make that comment in just a few minutes. So again, thank you It was wonderful to see that this was supported not only with the green coalition That was led by a former planning commissioner Who did a fabulous job as the chair of that but also incorporated?

The Arts Commission that was made a contribution to it and then again, we were able to open up the historic carriage house barn And find out just what was in there. So thank you all very much

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role30:48

Well, thank you chair Aikens and uh, it's exciting to see what's gonna happen with the carriage house It's a really beautiful building Thank you All right, well we will move on to public communication and just a reminder These are items not on the agenda and because they're not in the agenda. We cannot discuss them We appreciate your viewpoint and participation And we can agendize for the future And public comments are three minutes, so we'll take the first ten public comments and the remainder will be after the first agenda item. At the end of the three minutes there's a chime, so please respect all of our time and stop talking at that point. No giving away time, and there's a request to say your name and address. That's optional though. Just a reminder that this is the time Becomes informed on your opinions and Kindly, they'll refrain from side conversations and ambient noise because otherwise we just can't hear what's going on.

We can't hear the speaker and Let's all remember that also we are all part of the same community and this community includes all the people here in the audience on the dais and behind-the-scenes And while we may not agree with each other on everything, we all need to come from a place of mutual respect, consideration and civility. So I appreciate your efforts in that area. And we'll begin first with Ron Solarsano from the library and then Journey Wade Hack and Cyrus Mayer.

0:32 – 0:385 turns

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated32:29

All righty. Thank you so much members of council. My name is Ron Solorzano, I am the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley and I'm here tonight to give you an update on what we have going on at the Ojai Library. And I want to start by highlighting that this month we have a special craft kit available for kids to help them to design and make their own zines Children can create their own, their small sort of ephemeral booklets or magazines that they can then photocopy and distribute to family and friends. So we have kits that will have a bit of supplies to help them do that, a little bit of advice on maybe some topics they can get into, and all that will be available this month while supplies last so come on by the library to check that out.

Then later on November 20th, we're going to have another youth activity. This is going to be a Smash Book creating activity. It's basically an opportunity for participants to create their own personalized journal which they can decorate by writing or drawing, painting, gluing whatever they'd like onto it. This can include pictures, quotes that mean something special to them, tickets from old concerts or events or other keepsakes that they might want to include.

So this is an event for ages 8 and up, so yeah stop on by. That's November 20th again for that. Other youth activities that we have coming up some of our regular recurring ones we have our Perler Party crafter activity which is happening on Sundays from noon to 2. We also have our story times on Wednesday mornings at 1030 a.m., and then we have Lego play available on Fridays from 1 30 to 4 p.m.. So a lot going on for youth over at the Ojai Library I also want to mention that next month we're going to have a local author and Ventura County prosecutor, Richard Simon who's going to visit the Ojai Library. It's going to be 6 p.m. on Thursday December 7th he's gonna talk about his book titled Bring Me To Life it's a mystery thriller about a homicide prosecutor who's been assigned The case of his career, where a local tennis pro has murdered his ex-girlfriend and the case seems obvious until a high priced defense attorney hires an expert with a record of creating reasonable doubt.

So the author, Richard Simon, graduated from CSUN and Loyola Law School. He's been a Ventura County prosecutor since 1984. He's worked on cases that include the murder of Norma Rodriguez by Warren Mackey, the murders of Lisa Gondek and Rachel Zendejas, and the Seabee murder case. He has twice been named Prosecutor of the Year for the Ventura County DA's Office. So that again December 7th next month at a local author talk. This is all going on in addition to our normal activities, the ukulele club, the knitting and fiber arts clubs. And if you have any other questions about that, you can reach out to the library or visit our website. Thank you so much. Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role35:34

you, Ron.

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated35:34

A

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role35:35

lot going on. Exciting. Thank you. Next we have Journey Wade Hack then Cyrus Mayer and then Carol Wade.

CommentJourney WadehackProposedself-stated35:46

I have a resolution proposal that I wanted to talk about, and I wanted to know if I can hand these out to you folks now or maybe leave them for later. Thank you so much. So, good evening. My name is Journey Wadehack and I am an Ojai resident belonging to District 1. My family has lived here for 25 years since I was four years old. I have deep roots here and this place will always be home no matter where I am in the world.

I am proud of the fact that the city of Ojai proclaimed itself an international city of peace in 2015. That is consistent with the Ojai that I know and love I am here today to urge the city of Ojai to make good on that proclamation of peace by passing as quickly as possible a resolution calling for an immediate de-escalation and ceasefire in Gaza. It is important because, as Americans we are in a unique position of influence and therefore responsibility for what the Israeli government is doing at this very moment.

Rather than describe the situation over there in my own words, I want to share with you the words of Omer Bartov, a respected Israeli-American scholar of the Holocaust and IDF veteran speaking to a news program just a few days ago about the situation in Gaza. Quote, There is clearly disproportionate killing of civilians. That is, the numbers are now estimated to be over 10,000.

And even if we don't believe the numbers given out by Hamas, they're still in the many thousands. There may even be more because many bodies are probably buried under the debris and of those at least 4,000 are children and one has to remember that half of the population of Gaza is under 18 years old. So to me, there is an indication that there are war crimes happening in Gaza, potentially also crimes against humanity".

There's so much to say on this topic and history to look at, but my time is limited. Even more so, the time of innocent civilians in Palestine is limited. I am ashamed to be late in coming here to ask for this ceasefire resolution. The reports coming out of this part of the world are horrific, and crucially they are continuing with our support as Americans.

Besides the moral problems with bombing one of the most densely populated areas of the world, I don't think this makes Americans or Israelis any safer when we kill innocent people like we are doing. We unavoidably create new enemies. Please listen to your hearts. I am not asking the Ojai City Council to solve the Israel-Palestine conflict, I am asking that we do our small part to stand clearly for peace and to stay the hand of a government that Martin Luther King called the greatest purveyor of violence in the world.

Let me close by reminding everyone that the definition of a hypocrite is one who focuses on someone else's crimes while refusing to look seriously at their own. Thank you so much and peace be with you.

0:38 – 0:4510 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role38:38

And I appreciate your enthusiasm. If we could just hold any applause or any noise and that would be great. Next, we have Cyrus Mayer then Carol Wade and then Ray Powers.

CommentCyrus MayerProposedself-stated39:11

Yes, it's an honor to be here today to speak with you all. It's my first time here in City Council. My name is Cyrus Mayer. I live here in Ojai and I've been coming here since I was a child. I'm also here today to ask for support from you as our city council in this ceasefire resolution in solidarity with peace between Israel and Palestine We're asking for a special meeting to be called due to the urgency of this matter and at the very bare minimum for this to be added to an agenda.

However, I want to highlight the urgency of this matter in the ways that we can act as a voice. Since October the 7th, over 11,000 Palestinian civilians and 1,200 Israelis have died. Over half of these Palestinian civilians have been children. Thousands more are starving beneath the rubble and dying in the hospitals due to the denial of aid, of water, of food, of electricity, of fuel and medical resources into Gaza.

This military assault in response to the attacks of October 7th is said to be an effort to eradicate Hamas and retrieve the precious lives of Israeli hostages. However, several ceasefire hostage negotiations have been denied by the Israeli representatives and it is clear that this terrifying assault on innocent Palestinians will no doubt bring more hostility and extremism between the two sides.

I'm an Ashkenazi Jew I want to be clear that supporting a ceasefire is not anti-Semitic, and that this resolution when passed will actually improve my feelings of safety here in this city and in this nation knowing that we support and advocate for human rights of all people regardless of race, faith or creed. As our representatives within this political body, this political world I ask you please to hear this call for ceasefire.

We are uniquely tied to this war. Our country sends billions of dollars of military aid to Israel which is currently being used to kill thousands of Palestinian people and to remove millions from their homelands Please represent us and join the thousands of elected officials, community leaders, cities and individuals in support of this ceasefire in Gaza. Please join us. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role42:23

Thank you, Cyrus.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed42:24

Yes,

CommentCyrus MayerProposedself-stated42:25

ma'am.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed42:28

Is this a resolution? Are you saying that other cities have adopted?

CommentCyrus MayerProposedself-stated42:31

Absolutely. So this resolution that we've drafted for you has been put forth by the city of Richmond in California, as well as another city in Southern California most recently. I can't pronounce the name but it's in Los Angeles right outside of Los Angeles. Alameda County has put forth a resolution. The City of Providence has put forth a resolution. The City of Dearborn as well as a few other cities in Michigan And it's a growing popular movement to provide an advocacy campaign on our most local levels, to pressure our states and eventually our federal government to support the ceasefire. Because currently the United States is one of the few nations to deny a ceasefire within the United Nations resolution of a ceasefire So we see it as an imperative, urgent matter for us on the local level to build that movement and campaign for our federal representatives to agree to the ceasefire internationally.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role43:34

Thank you Cyrus. Next we have Carol Wade then Ray Powers then Didi Dorskund.

CommentCarol WadeProposedself-stated43:41

Hi thank you. Thank you for your work and thank you all for being here. My name is Carol Wade. I'm a citizen of Ojai for almost 25 years at the end of this month. I live in District 1. As I stand before you, there are armed conflicts in several places in the world. Sadly, the end of armed conflict comes at the high cost of human and other suffering and is not permanent.

There is no way to peace. Peace is the way. It's a question of time. Do we do it now or do we spill more blood and have more orphaned and dead children, create more bodies of all genders and all ages? More destruction, more starvation, more pain mind body and spirit. We human beings are capable of horrific things And too often the spotlight shines on that aspect of us.

We are also brilliant, bright beings of light with a core of good that is difficult to extinguish. Let's emphasize that. I feel blessed to be a member of the Ojai community. I am pleased that we have declared ourselves a city of peace I urge our council members to support our draft of the ceasefire resolution. I ask our council members to support this draft resolution and to get it on the agenda as soon as possible, including through if necessary setting up an emergency special meeting to get the resolution to the finish line as soon as possible and demonstrate that Ojai demands a ceasefire and opening of humanitarian aid to Gaza now.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role45:43

Thank You, Carol. Next we have Ray Powers then Didi Dorskind and then Brianna Skelly I think?

0:45 – 0:514 turns

CommentRay PowersProposedself-stated45:54

Good evening, I'm Ray Powers. I've also been living in OI for 25 years. Good to see all of you. I'm taken aback that Mark's not sitting right there. In a short time I grew to respect and love him a lot. I'm not here to talk about the ceasefire resolution because honestly, I haven't seen it. So I am here because several people in the community asked me to come and speak about peace.

I am one of the core founders of the Ojai International City of Peace along with Kathy Nolan Is she still here? She left. And Brian and Lisa Berman, and a handful of others. So we proclaimed 10 years ago Ojai as an international city of peace. And someone just before this meeting said so I'm paraphrasing you know what does that mean being an international city of peace like what does that mean philosophically or boots on the ground?

And it's an inquiry I'm constantly in There's a lot of symbolic gestures, a resolution, a flag, International Day of Peace. I guess what I'd like us all to do is just take a moment, brief moment of silence and quiet not only to send love and compassion to anyone who is suffering and not at peace I'm going to give you a couple of minutes. Try to ground into this concept of oneness that is so much thrown about and bantied about.

You know, are we all connected? And if so, can we treat each other better than we treat ourselves? And can we exercise emotional intelligence, restraint, give more than we take You know, I googled how many wars were going on right now in the world. There's 32 more than half of them have 10,000 plus people who've been killed either in a short amount of time or a long amount of time Every now and then, there's a nodal point like now in the Middle East that brings all our attention focused in one place.

And hopefully that breakdown will lead to a breakthrough and more peace in the world whatever that looks like. So be open to what Ojai International City of Peace looks like in our daily lives.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role49:37

Thank you. Next we have Deedee Dorskine, then Brianna Skelly and then Sasha Colbert.

CommentDidi DorskindProposedself-stated49:46

Hi, I'm Didi Dorskind. I'm a resident of Ojai. First of all, I want to say ditto about Mark Scott. I find that to be a grave loss to all of us and to all of you because the one person that was going to bring you peace and cohesiveness decided to leave because you are not cohesive So my first question is Mr. Whitman a flyer was recently circulated in Ojai asking voters in your district not to sign the petition for recall even though you are a lawyer and ostensibly should be aware of such things the mayor the mailer failed to state who prepared and paid for this mailer in violation of the California government code section eight 5 8 4 5 0 4 and F PPC regulatory 1 8 5 3 1 point five open parentheses ease closed parentheses open parentheses one close parentheses.

Is it another failure of yours and your cohorts to not follow the law? You've already been admonished by one Superior Court judge for failure to tell the truth. Will you now be truthful, and say who paid for it and was involved in this mailing of your flyer?" That's number one. Oh I know, you're not going to give me an answer, you never do. Mayor Stix, I would like to know if your youth council meetings are open to the public and to all students in the city. And if possible is there a way for us to participate and meet and see your meetings?

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role51:40

Thank you Deedee. Next we have Brianna Skelly then Sasha Colbert and then Chris Barton.

0:51 – 0:586 turns

CommentBrianna SkellyProposedself-stated51:50

Good evening, my name is Brianna Skelly. I'm a resident of Ojai in District 4. I am also here urging you all to support our draft that we have shared with you for a ceasefire. You know just building upon a few of the things that people have said this evening. I am a concerned citizen. I think many concerned citizens right now in the US are taking this into account because our tax dollars are funding this, and so we are implicated. And I think the change that can happen at the personal level, at the community level, and at the local level is really, really powerful. So I do think Ojai as a city coming forward supporting a resolution really matters, and there are other cities and counties and larger coalitions across the board that are coming forward with resolutions in support.

The UN General Assembly has adopted a resolution for immediate durable and sustained humanitarian truce between Israeli forces and Hamas militants in Gaza. As of today, I think over 400 Biden administration employees have signed an open letter demanding Biden pursue a ceasefire immediately. These things are catalysts for peace. I hear that there is conflict all over the world but I also see people across generations right now in our country really coming together and I think that coming together on this issue can catalyze peace elsewhere.

I think it's a really beautiful and powerful thing happening and I urge us as a city to take a stand for peace and especially Call for a ceasefire right now. It is a very urgent matter lives are being lost every second as we have said there are children right now that are in hospitals that have no electricity or support so I hope we can urgently address this. We do have copies of this resolution and any way that we as citizens can provide more information or support. We are here. I am here and I thank you for your time.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role54:13

Thank you Brianna. Next we have Sasha Colbert then Chris Barton and then Larry Steingold

CommentSasha ColbertProposedself-stated54:28

Good evening, council members. My name is Sasha Colbert and I am also a resident of Ojai. And I am also here tonight urging that you the Ojai City Council pass a resolution calling for an immediate de-escalation and ceasefire in occupied Palestine. Since October 7th, over 10,000 Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis have been killed. In addition it is estimated that over 25,000 Palestinians have been seriously injured and are unable to receive adequate care due to the continued bombardment.

If a ceasefire is not passed soon many more will die I'm here as a citizen who does not support the use of billions of American tax dollars that are funding this violence. This is money that should be spent instead on food, education, housing and health care. I am also here for my friend Mohamed Abu Jayab who in one night lost 45 members of his family. Due to airstrikes, America is complicit in the erasure of entire Palestinian families. This is nothing short of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.

The media has portrayed the ceasefire as controversial and complex. It is neither. Polling has shown that the majority of American voters support a ceasefire and it is simply the right thing to do. I invite you to represent your constituents, to help restore faith in our leadership and to stand on the right side of history. Due to the urgency of this matter, I urge you to pass this resolution in support of a ceasefire as soon as possible with deep thanks for your time and consideration. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role56:14

Thank You Sasha. Next we have Chris Barton and then Larry Steingold

CommentChris BartonProposedself-stated56:27

Thanks for hearing from us tonight. My name is Chris Barton, I grew up here. I live in Upper Ojai, but I went to Summit School and then Matiloha, Nordoff. I've built homes in town, done remodels and I work at a bike shop now here. My whole life is here. My family is here. I'm proud of my town. Proud of being a town of peace. I am also here hoping that you'll consider our resolution.

And not to be repetitive, I'm just going to leave some of the things out that I had prepared. I'm here because I'm tired of being complicit in the murder of thousands of Palestinians. Yeah, and I understand there's a lot of horrible things happening all over the world but this feels like Direct line, I shouldn't be able to draw a line between my tax dollars and the name of a child on a list of Palestinians murdered by so-called Israeli defense forces in the past month.

Which last time I checked that list is over 10,000. I'm tired of being told that considering the term genocidal is hyperbolic when describing the methods behind Israel's siege on Gaza. And I'm tired of watching our leaders amplify lies of warmongers and silencing voices of those trying to speak truth. I know it's a long way to the top. This is my attempt at thinking global and acting locally.

This is a moment which you, our local leaders have the power to take a stand for morality, liberation and peace. The United States more than any country in the world has the power to end this violence and hold themselves and the State of Israel accountable And as the people of Ojai continue to rise to action, as you see tonight. I hope that you'll join us in demanding an immediate de-escalation and ceasefire.

Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role58:53

Thank you Chris. Next we have Larry Steingold.

0:59 – 1:066 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed59:02

Larry Stein, old resident. I wasn't going to come here to talk about this because they didn't know it was going to come. I thought I heard about it but I wasn't sure. I was going to ask about the why and all the traffic and other things. But at this point Hamas is a terrorist organization stated by the United States government and the European government. They had a ceasefire. They intentionally broke the ceasefire and butchered 1,400 civilians at concerts and babies and kidnapping. You want to have a cease-fire? Hey, no problem. They had one before so they broke it.

Did we ask for a cease fire that the Japanese bombed us? How about the ceasefire with Al Qaeda? Oh, no. Okay. So do you expect the Israelis to put up with 1,400 butchered Really? To go, oh, we're not going to worry about it. We'll wait. So enough is enough, OK? These people have failed to miss opportunities with agreements with Habbas, PLO, what have you. The point is this was an intentional, insightful, murderous and butcherous act.

Now they want a ceasefire. These people want a ceasefire. I want a ceasefire. Bring the hostages back. The Israelis have had a pause. They're doing everything. Israelis, they're not looking to kill people. They're looking to kill the enemy and the enemy is a terrorist which we all agree are terrorists. Terrorists deserve to go. OK. That's what it's all about. They incited the country, they incited the world and now we've got a really big problem. And when you have free Palestine—I don't know what that means, what free Palestine means because right now Israel is there.

You have the West Bank, and you have Gaza. You can have history lessons, and we can show you coins from 1400 BCE. Doesn't matter. We have to navigate from here. OK? And if you want to have peace, fine. Bring the hostages home. And for Ray Powers, I've asked him what the Peace Organization does. Inner peace, what have you. But if they want peace here, how about the 700,000 that are dead in Russia and Ukraine? You don't hear anybody going let's have a peace.

Okay. How about Somalia? What are they, a million people in camps there? Five million people? How about the five and half million Syrians that weren't taken in by any of the Arab countries? So if you're going to be consistent, okay, and you want to have a proclamation, follow it to the end. Have a proclamation for peace in general You want to make it specific for Israel and the terrorists? Fine. Release the hostages alive to a neutral organization.

Hey, how about you? And if you want to see some real fun films watch them training kids to kill. With the hostages freed alive first then you want to have fun fine then have ceasefire. Don't ignore the hostages because that's what the UN did.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:02:18

Thank You Larry all right we will take the remainder of public comments after agenda item two so let's move on to the consent calendar is there a motion to approve

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:02:29

I'll make a motion to approve the consent calendar.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:02:32

Okay, all in favor? Aye. Okay wonderful alright we will move on to discussion this is agenda item number two introduction of an ordinance amending title six businesses professions and trades of the Ojai Municipal Code to add a new chapter eight titled proposed rental housing development rent disclosure ordinance do we have a staff report

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:02:57

yes Madam Mayor briefly Give me a second to get my packet to that, moment. So per the council's direction some months ago we've prepared a draft rental housing development rent disclosure ordinance. In a nutshell the ordinance provides that In any written communication by a buyer on behalf of a developer as defined for a proposed rental housing project, the communications must include several required pieces of information in at least a 12-point font.

The anticipated maximum rents for each of the de-restricted affordable units in the project stated in dollars per month for rent owed calculated using the current state affordable housing income limits at the time of the communication. For households of one person, two people and three people I'm sorry four people a second statement that those Anticipated dollars per month rent amounts will change as the income limits change under state law, as this happens annually.

The number and type of affordable deed-restricted units proposed within the project including zero for any unit type not included in the project and the types are moderate income, low income, very low income, extremely low income or acutely low income. The number of years of each deed restricted affordable unit's deed restriction Most commonly these days, those are 55 years under the state density bonus law but there are other possible options. The number and proposed size in square feet of each proposed market rate that is unrestricted rent unit within the project and a statement at the market rate unrestricted units would have no restrictions on rents unless otherwise provided by law as is sometimes true.

The ordinance is intended to pick up These elements of communication by developers and those acting on their behalf as Their commercial speech in the course of them providing a business run attempting to run a business namely rental housing and Requiring information to be provided as part of that business in the operation of that business I would note that the Staff report includes a sample disclosure as attachment B, sort of the sample of what would be provided for an example project to try to put that focus into clarity. And second we received a public comment letter from I don't have it printed here.

From the attorney for the Cabrillo Housing Development Corporation, Ms. Barbara McCree-Ortiz. She had made two recommendations and staff has concurred with those recommendations. One was to change the language regarding... I apologize that's not on this one that's on the other one no I'm sorry that was on the other one if I remember right Were there two letters and I'm mixing it up?

She had specific changes on the other one. I apologize, I'm mixing up my items. That's the other one. With that we would be happy to answer any questions on this item. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:06:15

Okay thank you Matt. Any questions from council? Council Member Ruhl?

1:06 – 1:1832 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:06:26

No, I just. I mean, I think it's I think it's great to be to be clear, but I'm trying to see where here. I just want to make sure that the kinds of information that are included I think we talked about this includes the idea that one income versus two incomes is very, very important that people understand. And I want to make sure that's in here and if so could you kind of point it out?

So we're looking at household size, but that doesn't specifically say number of incomes per household which is a different metric. Correct, so you know and it looks here. So I see the second bullet point maximum income for a two person very low income household. So when you say a two person very low income household are we talking about two people's income versus one people's income? Because I want to make, I think it's really important that this ordinance be very clear about that because that would tell someone how best to apply, I think it's incredibly important that that differential be very clear. Because numbers are numbers but for me it makes a huge difference if you have one income or two incomes right? So I just want to make sure that when we're talking about all of this information that the developer needs to provide and we're talking about clarity, you know.

The point is the goal is clarity for the tenants or potential tenants. I also want them to understand that it's not two incomes is just a bit more than one income So if they even knew to get a roommate, that all of the sudden they might be able to apply or that kind of thing. I think that to me is the most critical element is someone understands given their income how they could actually work it to apply. We're on questions so let's not stray into discussion. Yeah, so I'm asking if that is in here somewhere?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:08:56

I think that's inherent in the households of one person, two people or four people component. OK, so it is income objection to adjusting the language. The key there is that the state standard just look at the size of the household, though they don't look at the number of incomes you could have a four person household that gets the higher income even if not all four people are for incomes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:09:16

Right exactly, but it's really important in my mind that the tenants know that even if it's a four-person household That

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:09:24

you

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:09:25

know just

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:09:26

we're still on question so not discussion. We can talk about this after discussion I'm

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:09:30

asking if it's here. Just I just want to see if it is here because potentially I'm misunderstanding and it's not clear to me so That would be my question to you and we can certainly have discussion, but it might be here and I'm not seeing it

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:09:47

Yeah, I think it's inherent in the state's definition of households. It's just a raw count of the numbers of persons in the household The those persons in the household can be all income earners or some income earners are presumably at least one income

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:10:00

Okay, so in discussion we can talk about what we think is really important for it to be in this ordinance So that tenants understand the best way to make the The thresholds like how they can actually do it right? Thank you. Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:10:16

you any other councilmember Lang

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:10:17

Yeah, I have a question. So Matt, City Attorney, I believe the letter that you're referring to that you were referencing before is actually from the Executive Director of the Area Housing Authority of Ventura County? And in that he talks about the number of bedrooms of an affordable deed restricted unit must be considered when determining maximum rent for that unit. Is that the change that staff would consider or would recommend?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:10:54

Want to the only thing I can't recall is if he had if he proposed specific revised

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:10:58

language. He did he's he proposed a Two-person very low income household may occupy either a one bedroom or a two bedroom unit would pay a different amount So, I don't see any specific language but he proposed an example of how that would work I was, my question was it's... Was that the document that you were referencing before?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:11:28

Yeah. That wasn't what I was thinking of is I'm mixing up the Cabrillo and the AHA folk. And yeah, I think staff would be supportive of adjustments to reflect that reality.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:11:37

Thank you.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:11:38

Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:11:38

you. Mayor Pro Tem, Francina?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:11:41

Okay. I have several questions.

CommentJourney WadehackProposedself-stated1:11:45

Microphone please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:11:48

When you mentioned the area housing authorities, those are the people that distribute the vouchers. And I have some experience with that because I was thrilled after I think I was on some four-year waiting list when a few months before I lost my housing, I got a voucher And the figures of those vouchers do not apply to Ojai. Do you get my drift? Is that connected, is that

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:12:18

connected? The question I had, so the document we received this is in public, this is in the public comments that we received so anyone has access to this The executive director applauded the ordinance and offered a suggestion for something else to consider. So I was referencing that and not the specifics of the process. Okay, so he looked at this ordinance? Yes, specifically, I applaud the council's desire to clearly define the maximum monthly affordable rent of a de-restricted unit as a means of addressing transparency to the public. And then he offers the caution that I referenced in my question to Matt.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:13:03

Okay, so my other, am I okay? So I think Mark Scott asked about this, what is meant with any written communications about the project? What does that mean by any written communications? Didn't we got a letter and he mentioned that? What is meant by that?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:13:24

So any written communications would mean any document or whether paper, or email, or in any reduced to a fixed form communication by a developer as defined to include the applicant of record, the property owner if not the same as the applicant of record and any person and entity acting on their behalf sent by them to the public and or the city regarding the project.

Putting it into practical terms That would include things such as the application that's filed with the city for the permits, any communications about the project, the letters back and forth that often follow an application by the applicant to the city. It would also include any public comment letters or emails submitted to the Planning Commission of the Council, or any other commission if the project had other commissions review. It would also include any other communications they may make to the community or the public such as some applicants will pay for mailers or pay for ads in the newspaper things like that all of those would apply.

Any kind of written communication and the council could of course choose to narrow that definition if the council so chose but that's what's presently drafted

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:35

Okay so we all got a public comment from Kimberly Rivers, the reporter. All council members received those questions can we ask you know? So she asked We're with this proposed ordinance which you say you are. You are the you who put this forth and Matt Summers who drafted the ordinance. So so I think it's clear that the state definition of affordable is not really affordable. That's what we're saying right?

It's not really affordable it's just

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:15:20

I think it's we're question questions for staff. You're asking

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:15:23

really affordable is a difficult question to answer because that requires that I know you're in your Resources, I can't answer whether something is really affordable because I don't know the person's resources Okay but the ordinance is designed to attack the disconnect between the often commonly understood meaning of affordable and The legal meanings of affordable which as this is evident very heavily depending on the unit type the size the bedroom count, the person's income. The gap between the commonly understood meaning and the legal

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:15:55

meaning.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:15:57

The gap between the commonly understood meaning of affordable and the legal meaning of affordable. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:16:02

you that's all for now.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:16:04

Okay alright we will move on to public comment first we have Nora Harold then Bill Miley then Anita Cram And I'm just going to ask if we could just have silence and if you could hold the side conversations until or you can take them outside. And if we could just give the respect to the speakers thank you.

CommentJohn DruckerProposed · by introduction1:16:26

Hi, Nora Harold. I've lived in the Valley for over 14 years outside of the city. I am here to ask you all to please pass this ordinance. I'm here completely in support of anything and everything that provides actual affordable housing for our citizens. I've been here before. And spoken as an advocate for others. And I am losing my housing of 14 years due to my landlord needing to take his house back for personal reasons, so it is looking like we'll be leaving the valley because there is nothing in the valley affordable for us and we can take our work with us So I thought I was being an advocate for others for the last few months, and now I'm advocating for myself as well.

So please take care of our most vulnerable in any and every way you can. You know the economy is rough in Southern California As much as I work and as much as I do, I do not make enough money to afford this community throughout the entire valley. So thanks!

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:17:55

Thank you, Nora. And once again I appreciate your enthusiasm though if you members of the audience could remain silent please so we can hear up here. Thank you. Next we have Bill Miley and then Anita Cram.

1:18 – 1:245 turns

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated1:18:20

Good evening. For the record my name is Bill Miley So, here are my reasons why I believe this is unneeded. New affordable housing income guidelines are published every year by the state. All federal and state affordable housing laws and funding frame their support in rules for households not paying more than 30% of their annual household income for rent. The mayor states, often those who are unaware of the complexity of affordable housing rules will express support for a proposed affordable housing.

Expressing support for affordable housing in Ojai has not been a problem. The mayor is wrong here. She led the opposition to the Becker development so far successfully Although there was much misunderstanding about the difference in state guidelines and the years that we were using. The Planning Department and the Planning Commission provides clear information about needed affordable housing income and rents.

The mayor has stated lower-income units That too often are not offered as part of projects, if offered are too few in number. And that's true. Each project with deeded units are listed according to five incomes. The lower incomes require funding from state bonds and tax relief. And the Deeded and Becker Project didn't have any of that. Do we need this information in ordinance? I don't believe so.

Any developer will know exactly what the rents are to be charged and the income levels needed, and presents state and federal guidelines. 55 years is usually the only dated category. The mayor says should a proposed project include one or more market rate units, the number and size of the market rate units would be required to be disclosed. Along with the following statement these units would have no restrictions on rents.

The statement is irrelevant. Market rate units within a development are not deed restricted or priced at the current competition. Folks know that groceries are market rate when they go to a grocery store. To require developers to show the size probably indicates that the affordable ones are too small. In conclusion, much of this happens through our planning department, Planning Commission and through developers. There's no need to have a detailed somewhat oversight ordinance in our small city.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:21:29

Thank you. Thank you Bill. Next we have Anita Cram.

CommentAnita CramProposed1:21:35

Good evening, everyone. I urge City Council to vote yes on the proposal for a rent disclosure ordinance for developments within the city of Ojai our current housing crisis. In our current housing crisis, this makes perfect sense. Affordable housing is a very vague term subject to a different definition by everyone. The city needs to ensure all community members are housed. The income levels of the unhoused and those at risk of eviction due to development or other reasons needs to be assessed and matched with the rental rates that are set in development projects for affordable housing.

These development projects are required to replace low-income rental housing that is lost as the result of a development project. Rental disclosure would also be an important tool for the city to measure their own progress towards their compliance with their state mandated housing element. That prioritizes housing for low-income bracket community members. For this reason alone, you're housing an element and complying with it.

It would be a wise decision to implement the proposal ordinance that is being proposed tonight. You know, I've heard all kinds of reasons of why we shouldn't do this but you know, I've heard every one of you city council members express your deep concern for housing of our low income community members so now is a moment for you to step up and put your words into action The suggestion that this goes against, I've heard free speech but apparently that isn't coming up tonight. But that's really very deceptive because you know this allows for not right now it ends up allowing for deceptive representation of the truthful affordable housing needs in our community So you know, I can't understand why you wouldn't do this. There's just so many reasons of housing element.

You all feel this is so important. I've heard council members say oh we can't take this piecemeal approach to do this then that then that. You guys it's the only way to get it done. If you had a big full project you'd never get through it. It would be stalled and hem-hawed. This is another piece of making our community a better community for everybody who lives here and makes it function. So please vote yes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:24:26

Thank you Anita, any comments online Weston?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:24:30

Yes mayor we do have raised hands for item number two first we have Barbara McCree-Ortiz followed by Jerry Schwenke. Ms. McCree Ortiz you have the floor.

1:24 – 1:319 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:24:42

Thank you I think I'm unmuted.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:24:44

Yes you are please proceed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:24:45

Okay, thank you. Just listening to this discussion just wanted to make a few points. One of the biggest problems we have in Ventura County is we have such a wide range of incomes primarily in the east county. The rent incomes are very high and that's why we get stuck with this median income of I think it's now what $123,000 which I think is absurd. Which basically means that You know, very low income is 50% of that figure.

So the amount of money you need or the definition of who is low income keeps getting stretched with respect to this ordinance I think it's a good idea too. Limit the communications to communications with the public, because what you're trying to do is educate the public. And there's a lot of communication that goes back and forth while you're doing your project. And I don't know that we need to have for every single one an explanation of all the rents.

Household size is what is the focus and the way You qualify in terms of whether you have a one or two bedroom or three bedroom is based on your household size. And also the income of the household, whether that is one income, two incomes, three incomes, it doesn't matter. It's just that the total of the incomes have to come within the threshold in order to be eligible.

So you'll have different amounts of income that's available or that they can make depending on the size of the unit. And also, the rents are determined by the size of the unit. So I don't see that it's a difference between whether it's a one-income house or two-income house. I think the statement needs to be that all members of that household can make up to a certain amount in order to be eligible for that unit And the unit, the rents are figured on the units.

Primarily based on 30% of that income level. But that's tax credits, theirs don't actually fall exactly on the 30%. So it's a little tricky. But I think you should focus on the communications that are being made with the public because the public is the one that you're trying to serve here and not every single piece of paper that goes in the development process quite a bit and unnecessary. Thank you. Thank you, Barbara.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:27:42

Next we have Jerry Schwenke. Jerry, you have the floor?

CommentJerry SchwenkeProposedself-stated1:27:46

Oh good evening my name is Jerry Schwenke I live in fourth district, and I absolutely support this proposal. And I got to thinking about that little analogy of going to the grocery market and everything there is market value. Well, that may be true but when I walk down the aisle and there are like 20 different kinds of bread They're all clearly priced. I don't have to wait till I get up to the checkout stand to find out what I'm going to be paying. I can make my choices and, you know, based on full disclosure of the price of groceries.

Housing is just as important. And I think that full disclosure upfront of what it's gonna cost to live in these places is absolutely important to potential renters, all of us. So I've got to say thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:28:50

Thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:28:50

Jerry.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:28:51

No more raised hands for item two Mayor.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:28:53

Okay, all right. We will move on to discussion and as I did bring this up in a meeting and council decided to put it on the agenda, I would like to begin and I appreciate all the public comments and I believe that this is a time for the council to step up and take care of all the people in our community especially the most vulnerable. And the reason you know really comes down to vocabulary Could I ask the audience to refrain from side comments so that we can hear?

The purpose of this ordinance is to give the public and decision-makers specific information about rental rates in all proposed new residential developments in Ojai, that if built would have one or more deed restricted affordable housing units. It's intended to solve the issue with the word affordable, because as we know most of us think when we hear the word in terms of a home that means that the home is accessible to low-income households.

This word though has been co-opted it has a very specific legal definition in the context of deed restricted moderate low very low extremely low and acutely low income households And so this ordinance would inform the public and decision makers of the maximum monthly rent amounts of these income levels. It's actually quite simple, and is a very useful tool.

I've been hearing about this topic from constituents since I ran for office in 2020 because people expressed a real desire to know how much monthly rents are in any proposal. And this ordinance really helps people come to a conclusion about whether or not they want to express support, or dissent of a project by providing more information. The most important information in my mind.

And it is such a useful tool and it will be a positive contribution to public understanding of who will actually be able to live in a proposed development. And I think our community deserves to know that, and once again we need to take care of people who really need help. So I also want to thank our attorney Mr. Summers for writing a beautiful and very elegant ordinance and for doing the research It's really cutting edge and as I said, it's a beautiful way to take care of our most vulnerable population.

1:31 – 1:4027 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:31:30

I'd like to speak next. Mayor Pro Tem? So how does this work, I'm not a developer, that's not my background, I have knowledge and expertise in other areas but can a developer project What the rent will be, like it's in practical terms has how does this work? How does it work? How does this encourage low and you know truly low income

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:32:04

How does it work? Well, it's transparency. So rather than just stating this number of units low income, this number of units very low incomes, it's informing our community about the actual how much that would cost for rent. I'm going

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:32:22

to answer that a little further. Does not promote nor not promote any developer for promoting any kind of unit count? In other words, it doesn't promote the developer builds more or less affordable or market rate units. What the ordinance is designed to do is to require that the developers' communications state plainly the expected dollars per month rent. They can't project it for the future so it's designed to state it as of the date of the communication What is the expected rent amounts in dollars per month based on the unit count that they're proposing? I have some modifications based on the commentary. I'll get in that moment But the idea being that when a developer comes into proposal for the housing project Given the realities of density bonus law, the housing overlay zones and other applicable laws They always have two numbers certain I'm going to go ahead and get started.

a unit

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:33:33

count.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:33:35

If I know they have five very low-income units, I can calculate with a little more information the anticipated maximum monthly rent for those units today because it's a math problem based on that they're very low income or if it's moderate income say you can calculate that from there. That's what this is designed to do is take the information from the developer which is how many very low-income units, how many moderate income units etc and convert it to dollars per month math With the caveat is noted that it will change because the maximum rent amount owed for a very low-income unit today is not going to be the same as the maximum rent amount for very low income unit in three years when the building is built.

Assuming you figure a year for entitlements and then two years to build, so it's not going to be on a certain It's not going to be certain information that the tenant, the future tenants can look at this and say oh I know I can afford that. I'll be able to go into that unit it won't be that guarantee because it'll go up as incomes presumably go up. So there is that reality, but the intention is to at least provide some information in a more easily understood fashion than in dollars per month rather than the current five variable income units you can run the math yourself. It forces developers to run the math.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:00

Okay. But can, okay say that we don't like the numbers. Can we then deny the project? Negotiate what happens then?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:35:11

We can always negotiate always depending on the projects details and how many affordable units and what type and some other factors it would probably be difficult to deny the project if it had a certain sufficient affordable units and goes into the whole panoply of housing laws Generally though, it's a negotiation tactic and it's an understanding tactic. But we aren't necessarily—if we don't think that say they propose five very low income and we want more, depending on the facts of the project, we may not be able to force more but we can always ask for more.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:46

So, may I ask one more? Can I mention the Cabrillo project when it came before the Planning Commission?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:35:53

Let's use hypothetical examples because that's on tomorrow's Planning Commission agenda and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:57

will

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:35:59

be coming to the Council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:00

But my question is when that project came before the Planning Commission didn't they give figures?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:07

As I recall they did. They provided information and I think that's in this in the packet for tomorrow

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:12

Okay, so is that information sufficient? What's in the packet tomorrow or is this proposing something different.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:21

This is proposing more information than they've provided for that project but again that's a separate project that we're not deciding tonight. That's on tomorrow. But okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:29

so just to be clear this is asking for more information than what's provided in in the Planning Commission

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:38

packet and more precisely it's asking for more specific information The Planning Commission packet includes the information to run the math because it states the number of units and the type of units. This asks that the developers then take that and convert out the income limits based on the three household, the samples one person, two people and four people.

And I would propose we adjust that to account for bedroom size and then convert that into straight dollars per month. That level of that next step of information is not in as I recall not in tomorrow's packet and would be beyond what developers have provided in the past focusing on other developers. Again, we're not debating that particular project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:37:17

I mean it sounds really good but we don't know if the figures that they're giving is actually what that's going to be, is what you said right?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:37:27

We know that there are anticipated figures based on what the rent would be required if the unit existed today. That will not be what the rents are charged when the unit is built. That's true. It's an anticipated maximum rent The other point that's worth noting is that all of these rent amounts are maximums. The actual rent paid by a person who qualifies may be lower because the requirement is that you make no more than the stated income amounts to be eligible to join, to then participate and usually it's a lottery sometimes it's first come first serve there's always an application process If you make less, so let's say for a very low income unit right now for one person or household of one person that's $46,500.

You have to make 46,500 or less to be eligible to apply for that unit but there is no, there is no, you don't have to pay the maximum rent it's that exact rent you can pay less if you make less. It's a function Your maximum income not your it's not

CommentDoug LabarProposed · by introduction1:38:34

minimum Susan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:38:37

maybe You know, I know these questions have been asked before and I know that if you're Living in certain types of housing. They always want to know your income and your tax see your tax return and Now, it could be someone like me. I could struggle for years and years writing a book for which I get no, you know, maybe years before I get an advance. And so then what happens if I suddenly get a really nice... How does, you know, like when I'm worried about all this micromanaging? That concerns me.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:39:12

Understood so let me answer that quickly and then I'll the Information if you have a low-income restricted unit and your income suddenly shoots up in Most cases, and I use the word most because that's a very specific question We don't have the documents in front of us because it's hypothetical In most cases you can stay in the unit for at least a year or but you may not be able to stay in it past the year unless you can prove your income is gonna go back down. Most of the affordability covenants have an annual check on your income, so if your income spikes up for a year, you may not be able to stay, but it's gonna depend on the details of that unit type which generally depends on why it's an affordable unit and that breaks into two big categories.

Deed-restricted affordable units due to density bonus and deed restricted affordable units due to tax credit financing Sometimes it was the same, sometimes they're not. And that, the affordability covenants will dictate the rules based on what happens if your income spikes. But you're not kicked out that day. You may not last the next year though.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:40:16

It may become clearer as the discussion goes on Susan there's a

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:40:17

lot, a lot of details. So the way I perceive this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:40:19

is basically

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:40:20

a consumer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:40:21

information document

1:40 – 1:568 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:40:35

And for me, the information that consumers need is they need to know information about, as you said, the bedrooms and what number of people you can have in the units based on the bedrooms. And as I recall it's two people per bedroom and then you can have one person on the couch. Okay, so they need to know that. They need to understand that when they look at these numbers they are talking about household incomes. So when you have this number of people That's the number of people in the household, but it's not the number of people that are contributing to the total income. And that's what they need to know. They need to know that it's total income so they can start to work with that. So that to me is a very important piece and the reason it is a very important piece is that we have While this may be low-income housing, for us our teachers would qualify.

You know what I mean? And so I think that we need to understand that this isn't just low income housing because our population doesn't make nearly the median income But for instance, two teachers perhaps. So I want people to be able to look at this and say oh, I do have a job even if you have two minimum wage jobs at $15.50 an hour which is the California minimum wage If you had full-time, that would be $33,000 each. Which would mean if you had two people that would be $66,000 and I want people to be able to do that kind of...I want a matrix where they can actually do that. So what we have now is we have all the numbers and what we're asking for is okay developer actually do the math for us and put it there.

I don't want to get into whether or not this is a tension between our low, low renters and they feeling that low income doesn't speak to them. What I just want is the information for everyone in our community to understand that they may be low-income Even though they are fully employed in a professional job. I've talked to people and I've shown them examples of low income housing like the Cabrillo, but the one they built in Fillmore and I've asked them would you live in this? And these are people that are semi-professional.

The choice of living with their parents and living in one of these is hands down they will take these, right? So what I don't want this to become is you know gosh the state is all wrong we really aren't low income. You know they're trying to pull the wool over our eyes. I want this to become something that our community can look at and figure out what they qualify for regardless of whether they consider themselves low income or very low income. It's a standard formula, you know Susan it's based on the average median income and then a percentage of that right? So you have your average median income 140 let's just say 150,000 okay and moderate is 50% of that let's just say Okay, I'm trying to go to round numbers so we can do the math really easily.

So if you have $150,000 and you have moderate income is 50% of that, you know that together your household income has to be no more than $75,000. So that's what I want people to know. I don't want us to go out there and say, gosh gee we're really not... It's a lie right? They're fooling us it's a semantic question No, let's make it real and true for our community to figure out if they can move in to these low-income and low-low income and moderate income houses that we are required to build. Right? So that's my goal as far as public information and clarity to the public. It's not about saying the state is You know, exaggerating what everybody makes. That's pointless and doesn't do any good for anybody. What we want to do is put people in houses that they can afford.

So I think that for that reason, we need to have those three pieces of information. We need to have household size. We need to have the area median income and how that breaks down percentage-wise all the way down to low income. And then we need to be very clear that we're talking about household income versus number of people living in the household so people can figure it out, you know? And then they can make an informed choice about whether or not they want to build housing for themselves and for their colleagues and for the people that need it.

So that's my statement, and I think I've said everything I really have to say. So definitely tell me not to say more and waste your time, okay?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:46:35

Thank

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:46:36

you. Council Member

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:46:36

Lange. Yeah, so I think just... I think that one of the things I'm leaning toward supporting this ordinance for a couple of different reasons. One, I was just, I'm really proud of this but I was just appointed to the Community Services Policy Committee within the California League of Cities through one of the caucuses that I'm a part of. And I've been ramping up learning about what other cities are doing for housing policy that protect renters and that also accommodate, that provide Real, truly affordable housing for the residents.

And there are so many cities right now that are doing really innovative ordinances. There to my knowledge, I don't know of any other policy like this in the state. And so kind of like we did with the bodily rights of elephants, I think we could really be leaders in this. I know some of you are laughing about that but I thought that was something I was really proud of.

Yeah, I know exactly exactly We have an opportunity here to do something really innovative And I think to you know to councilmember rules point what? I think one of the challenges with commute with the general but with anyone who is looking for housing or anyone who is Confused about what they would qualify or what what the rents are in the communities. This would outline Here is here is a housing development. Here are the ranges of rents For this housing development, so we're not telling any developer what they can and can't build We are not doing anything to prevent affordable housing or to delay it or just slow it What we're doing is we're saying to To the residents to our community Here is the project that's being proposed. Here are the prices of the rents, and someone who is a teacher or who falls within that low-income range who might not consider themselves to be low income because they have a good job as a teacher or a nurse or a firefighter, they might not think I'm low income.

They might think that's somebody else But low income, as we know from the charts that we have seen in the public comments that were sent in and just from knowing housing law and housing policy in the state. Low income, people who could be considered low income have good jobs. So this would give them an ability to see themselves in a deed restricted property that they might not otherwise see themselves in. So it gives them more options.

I really appreciate what Miss Ortiz said. She's an expert in this and I trust her, and hearing her tonight really helped me lean more and solidify my decision about supporting this. And I do like the recommendations that she proposed specifically addressing this toward public communications. But the fact that, you know, Properties that she would be involved in would be properties that this ordinance would apply to.

And we have some projects like this coming up, and I think it would help anyone who is thinking about whether or not they support a project and want to come and speak in public comments. This ordinance would give them all the details they need to know so they don't have to go up and look and do math. Who has time to do math, except for us? We do math. That's our job to do math.

But this would give them a real clear way of seeing whether or not they're in support of something, whether or not something is affordable, or whether we could do better. So I think it gives us an opportunity to hear more from the residents, from the people who matter the most. I also am just going to go back and ask staff to reconsider that email that we received from the Executive Director of the Area Housing Authority.

In it he proposed or he referenced, he talked about some of the challenges with this ordinance as it is And so I would ask staff to consider some language in reference to what he proposed. Specifically, looking at the number of bedrooms and so in communication Price number of bedrooms so that so that people so if we are do if we are promoting transparency and We are coming up with our own solutions to the real problems. We have with affordable housing That we're considering everything all aspects of it

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:52:13

Councilmember Whitman,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:52:14

yeah So what I'm The way I'm seeing this is that We're talking about two topics. This ordinance is designed primarily to address one, so that one topic is that when the term affordable is used it doesn't tell you whether you can actually afford it and this ordinance does a good job of explaining What it's going to cost to rent a room or to rent a unit You know with a bunch of details filled in with that what the part that we're not really addressing here is saying Who can't afford it?

That's not in this ordinance and I don't think it needs to be in this ordinance. I see potentially two ways of addressing that issue though. One is either refer the potential consumer, Matt said earlier if he knows you know certain facts he can do the calculations pretty quickly to figure out and so we can potentially refer to consumers those regulations which tell you who is going to qualify for that income, that affordability level.

Or if that would be too convoluted for a consumer could we make our own kind of a grid or table that was an appendix That would allow someone to do that. Now I'm not wedded to the idea that we should do that in this ordinance, I do think it's something that we do need to provide the public with the information that they need to know can I qualify for these units?

I would like to see this include a statement whether the proposed project removes any of the protected affordable units that are described in that government code six six three hundred.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:55:01

The Housing Crisis Act of 2019

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:55:03

right and if affordable units are being removed Are the affordable units being replaced and how? If that slows the process down, I don't need it to go in now but I think eventually we should have that. And then the final thing I'd say is that I think we can address the concern that Attorney Ortiz had. That if a developer makes that initial statement to the city and you know, so we've described it as writings to the public or to the city.

If they make that initial disclosure then it doesn't make sense for them to continue to have to do that unless things have changed. So, that developer should have the ability to say nothing has changed from our initial disclosure or it has changed and here's how. And that way they can greatly streamline you know they don't have to like put together a book each time they do it and those are all my comments

1:56 – 2:0222 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:56:37

All right. Well, I really appreciate council members comments very thoughtful Is there and also on a personal note having been a teacher most of my life? I Thought it was doing okay, and I didn't realize what I was low-income nothing and um And he was doing okay, so I think that's an example. And I appreciate council members bringing up teachers because we really, you know, that's the biggest employer in our valley, that and tourism. So we really do need to support all of our teachers. We have so many schools and so I really appreciate that focus. Is there a motion that someone is ready to put on the table?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role1:57:17

And before a motion, I'm happy to sort of summarize adjustments that staff sees. Thank you. That might be baked into a motion. So council might consider a motion introduce the ordinances proposed with some adjustments that would include in the primary section 6803 to provide as in all go in order in the text. In every written communication to the public and once to the city unless the project description has changed making that point in The disclosures include seven things.

The first being the anticipated maximum rents for each redistricted affordable unit stated in dollars owed for rent each month calculated using the current affordable housing state income limits as published by the State Department of Housing and Community Development effective at the time of the communication For the applicable type of deed restricted affordable unit including the applicable numbers of bedrooms proposed for each unit type.

Each unit types maximum occupancy in numbers of persons and With the statement that the applicable maximum income amounts are maximum household income amounts for households of one person, two people and four people to include the applicable income limits for each unit type. And we'll massage where they put the commas and so forth but to include each of those points and then in the second bullet to a statement that the anticipated maximum income I'm sorry, anticipated maximum de-restricted affordable unit rents stated in dollars per month will change as income limits change under state law and may vary by each unit's bedroom count and other factors as required by applicable law. Designed to account the AHA, our representative from AHA's point about bedroom size but also there may be something we haven't anticipated that's baked into some financing component.

Third, the number and type moderate low, very low, extremely low, acutely low of each restricted unit. Four, the number of years of restriction. Five, the number proposed size in square feet and bedroom count. bed, room count of each proposed market rate unrestricted unit. Six is statement that the market rate unrestricted units would have no restrictions on rents and seven the new one the point that whether the project proposes removal of any units protected by the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 and if so how and whether they're being replaced?

And with that, staff would recommend the ordinance as adjusted. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role1:59:51

Are you ready for the motion? I will make. OK,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.861:59:54

let's get the motion and then we can have my just a quick question, but that's fine. Go ahead. Make the motion. I'll ask the

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.841:59:58

question. I'll make a motion to direct staff to return with a revised ordinance for our review considering the changes proposed by the city attorney.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:00:13

Is there second?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:00:15

I'll second.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:00:16

Okay, thank you. Question?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:00:17

Yeah I did. So I know that you said the anticipated maximum and so I know that you could assume that the maximum for the type of housing below it would be the floor. I'm just saying do you want to put a floor and a ceiling in there rather than having people assume? You know, it's within a range. Right? So maximum is maximum but range is range so ceiling and floor and I don't know. I'm just saying sometimes it's easier when you're trying to figure something out if you can look between the range rather than looking having something separated where your my making sense where your floor is actually the ceiling of the category below it. So you could have floor and ceiling I'm just saying that when you're looking at something, it's easier to see when it's arranged than to try just visually.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:01:15

You do what you want. Yeah, I get that point that we sort of can put ourselves in a range easier than you can assess whether you're above or below a single point. My hesitation is as I recall the affordability covenants Typically don't specify a minimum income, but that may vary by project type. So I would suggest that council authorize us to communicate with AHA and Cabrillo and other people who live in this space as to whether there is a minimum component and if so can

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:01:43

Right at that

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:01:43

point.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:01:43

Yeah, so from what I understand at least in some projects you do have to fall within the range You can't like downgrade yourself or you know? You're within this range and that's where you fall and you don't get to downgrade yourself or upgrade yourself, you know

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:02:00

Part of that reflects the fact that they do

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:02:02

yeah, so I don't know. I'm just I want this to be as clear as Possible for the public so they can figure out where they stand in all of this So that was just a point to make and you know take a look at the matrix and maybe it works that way Maybe it doesn't

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:02:19

All right. Well we have a motion and a second could we have a roll call please?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:02:24

Was that last authorization for staff to communicate included in the motion

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:02:28

I'll include that in my motion, yes please.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:02:31

And I think that one might be covered as well by including a low-end range as applicable because that again would vary by unit type and then the only question staff will have is is the intention to introduce the ordinance with these oral amendments or to return with a revised text to be introduced next time? We would

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:02:52

ask for clarity on that. I would introduce the ordinance thank

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:02:56

you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:02:57

Weston roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Roll call. Councilmember Whitman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes. Council Member Lange? Yes Mayor Stixx? Yes Council Member Ruhle?

2:03 – 2:1611 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:03:08

Is it too late to ask a question?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:03:12

I

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:03:12

think after the motion is

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:03:15

For visually, okay. I just want to make sure that we're holding on to the fact that we still have the second reading and we won't rush through it and all that kind of stuff is done.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:03:23

Second reading is still a

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:03:24

thing.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:03:25

We can make minor changes without having to introduce again.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:03:29

Yeah yeah yeah okay

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:03:30

then yes.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:03:31

Motion passes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:03:31

All right motion passes 5-0 thank you and let's take a brief intermission and we'll be back with the rest of the public comment All right, if you could please we are back. If you could take your seats please and come to quiet. If you could come to quiet please and we are back. We are going to continue with the remainder of the public comment so first we have Aviva Bernat then Vaughn Montgomery and then Helena Pascorella.

Is Aviva here? Okay, Vaughn Montgomery.

2:16 – 2:244 turns

CommentHelena PascorellaProposed · by introduction2:16:59

I didn't have a good place for my coffee. All right, thank you for giving us a chance to speak with you and thank you to the various folks who already spoke about this issue. Peace be with you. Shalom and salaam alaikum. A quote from Thich Nhat Hanh If we want peace, we have to be peace. Peace is a practice not a hope. Once again, we hear the horrible drums of war.

We hear the usual talking heads in the media conditioning people to hurry to one side or the other. Once again, we hear them tell us that those people on the other side are ignorant or evil or both. Some will even suggest that the other side shouldn't even be allowed to speak or protest That their thoughts or words are a crime, that they are not human. Within the noise of this hateful divisive rhetoric of gory videos added sound effects sweeping judgments and threats of revenge which come from both sides we also have a gentle and holy flame of hope.

A growing number of Arabs and Jews Muslims Palestinians and Israelis, including those whose families were murdered or taken hostage are calling for a ceasefire. Behind these brave peacemakers many of whom risk their livelihoods, their physical safety, arrest or even death is an international chorus of human rights groups, academics, doctors, activists and citizens joining in solidarity around the ceasefire Just a few of the reasons why so many of us are calling for a ceasefire.

Because a ceasefire stops the inhumane murder of innocent civilians on both sides of this conflict between Israel and Palestine. Estimates are at least 1,200 Israelis and 11,000 Palestinians have been killed so far. The majority of deaths in Gaza include women and children. Defense of Israel does not include mass murder of women and children. Just as Palestinian liberation cannot include mass murder of women and children, people in both nations have been fixed in a continued state of trauma and fear for over five weeks now.

A ceasefire offers them a chance to catch their breath, process the grief make timely critical decisions about how they will respond to the nightmare of the last month and how they will navigate the unknown future. A ceasefire will stop immediately the humanitarian crisis that is now raging in Gaza and allow for the essential delivery of medical supplies, food, water, fuel that is waiting at the border.

The ceasefire will also allow for the urgently needed diplomatic dialogue which has been put on the back burner that can focus on both the return of Israeli hostages and the return of some of the roughly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners many of whom are Israeli citizens who have been arbitrarily detained under a loophole in Israeli law without charge or trial. A ceasefire will allow for the international investigation of any and all war crimes committed by either or both parties A ceasefire will allow for the long overdue deeper work of representatives from Israel, Palestine and the international community to more thoughtfully consider the best way forward for the people of the region whether as a two sovereign states or as a united state under a new and unified title that might resonate with both parties.

Finally, a ceasefire limits the

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:20:40

likelihood- It's time. Can you? Thank you. Thank you, Vaughn. Time is up. Appreciate your comments. Next we have Helena Pascarella, then Jody Lewis and then Sue Williamson.

CommentSue WilliamsonProposed · by introduction2:20:56

Good evening City Council and Mayor. I just want to thank you for your time and for being here and listening to us. I gave you all a heart and it reminds me to speak from the heart and I appreciate you listening from the heart. And it also I hope represents that you will make your decisions from the heart And I wanted to say, I'd like to acknowledge that this meeting is being held on the traditional lands of the Chumash people.

And I pay my respects to the elders of both the past and the present. My name is Elena Pasquarella and I am a member of the U.S. Department of Peace, and we're the group that holds the peace vigils every Friday at the Libbey Park Arcade. And we've been doing it for over 20 years now every Friday. We've been there because the wars keep coming and keep lasting.

Someone mentioned why didn't we do this for the war in Ukraine and Russia or Syria? And I believe that there's a movement now, and we're just tired of the United States government declaring war on the world and supporting wars like the one that's going on in Gaza and in Israel. When we were at the meeting last Friday, the peace vigil, there was about 12 people and there was a sign that said stop the genocide.

And I truly believe that what is going on now is a genocide of the Palestinian people. As people have mentioned 1,200 Israelis were murdered and 200 people were taken captive. And that was wrong but that does not warrant the continued bombing and killing of Palestinians of more than 11,000 people as we know children and women and UN workers and doctors So I'm here to ask you to read the ceasefire and to make this decision with your hearts and know that your constituents here in Ojai, we're a city of peace as Ray Powers mentioned. And we are all connected to each other but to the Palestinians as well and to the Israelis as well who have lost their life in this war.

So I ask that you pass the resolution or listen to it and make a decision, meet about it. And one of the things that because we are a city of peace there were a few things that are mentioned about being a city of peace and I wanted to mention promote and respect all human rights advance understanding and tolerance and solidarity promote international peace and security and that's what we can do as a city of peace by passing this resolution thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:23:54

Thanks, Helena and thank you for the hearts. Jody Lewis and then Sue Williamson and then Nora Harold.

2:24 – 2:295 turns

CommentSue WilliamsonProposed · by introduction2:24:08

Hi, thank you for taking all of our comments and listening with your heart right? So today I'm up here As another voice asking for a special meeting to adopt the proposed resolution for ceasefire. And I'm here to say we cannot wait another two weeks, take any two-week slot of what is going on. We cannot wait. The thousands more will be dead. Thousands more children will be killed.

Those on both sides will Especially for us, like we're a city of peace. We're an international city of peace and that means something. I'd like to read from a letter written by Jennifer Brady the UN representative for the International Cities of Peace to the UN Secretary General written on the 23rd of October. And it describes the mission and the responsibility of Cities of Peace.

The mission of International Cities of Peace is to help organize a tipping force for global peace. To that end, we are creating the infrastructure of peace community by community to localize, democratize and sensitize geopolitical decisions to the needs of families. And in Ojai we're a community of families I personally, Jodi Lewis, I've lived here for 12 of the last 15 years. I've raised my children here. My house flies a flag that says practice radical empathy.

My husband who was my husband for 24 years, Ashkenazi Jew. My three daughters, our three daughters we raised they identify as Jewish. All of them are cheering me on for being here And are equally as horrified as I am by what's going, and so many people here are, by what's going on in the Middle East. My girls spent some years at Oak Grove and they know their way around a peace table.

And I think that's baked into the DNA of this city and there is a responsibility to our kids who are watching to show up as an active an active international city of peace. And a ceasefire is the only thing that gets all sides to the peace table. We need this now, we cannot wait. We need a special meeting to basically become an active city of peace and create together what is our responsibility and what we agreed to. Thank you Jody.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:27:14

I just want to thank you Jody and all the rest who have spoken on this and And just say that when We come toward the end of our meeting and we talk about future agenda items I will be I've heard you all and I've read all of the comments that have come in. And so I will be Talking about this later when the time is is appropriate Thank You

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:27:40

Next we have Sue Williamson then Nora Harold then Andy Gilman

GuestSue WilliamsonCity ManagerProposedself-stated2:27:47

Good evening I'm Sue Williamson. I live in Ojai I'm here this evening to present to the council and city manager our petition from the Terra Mina Theosophical Community Incorporated requesting to be put on your agenda To consider and hopefully ratify a change in the Terra Mina Historic District Ordinance Rather than read the petition here, I'm going to just pass it out to you but to quickly summarize.

As I said before here in public comments, the current roof restrictions are constructively preventing building low-income housing on our numerous empty lots and given the current and ongoing public housing crisis we feel this is a great opportunity for the council to take positive action to address this crisis Thanks for your consideration and I hope to see this on the agenda soon. I'm gonna pass it out And since I didn't get to comment earlier because I was anyway, I just like to throw in real quick that I do support the idea of requiring rent Disclosure on proposed rental housing developments as well as local tenant preference policy for low-income here

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:29:00

Thank You Sue Next we have Nora Harold then Andy Gilman and then John Drucker

2:29 – 2:3723 turns

CommentJohn DruckerProposed · by introduction2:29:09

Hi, everyone. I am so moved by all the comments tonight about the ceasefire and I stand in support of peace and an end to war and violence everywhere. However, an ordinance like that passed by a city council who has members who are currently attacking other council members and attacking people of the public who come up to speak is performative. Peace, it starts here.

It starts here. What we see there, that murder and bloodshed and horror is a manifestation of our inability to come together everywhere. Last night in the Senate, Bernie Sanders had to step in to prevent a fist fight between a representative of the Teamsters and a senator who was challenging the representative of the Teamsters to a fight. Right? This is everywhere, this conflict.

So during the workshop this summer, the priorities workshop, there was an idea floated. Tisha Morris spoke about it. You all talked about it. Rachel proposed it that you all sit down and create together that you collaborate and create a code of ethics and a way to Interact and behave with one another so you can model that piece for our community Because you are in a position of power I know it probably doesn't feel that way right because you're all on your attack all the time, but you are So when you all take actions Go on social media and trash another council member yell at a community member in public Call me a name Reference someone who called me a name and say you agree with him when you take those actions You say Okay, it's okay to do this.

And then we're not an international city of peace. We're not That is also performative It's performative until we actually create it Thanks

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:31:48

Thank You Nora Next we have Andy Gilman then John Drucker then Rosemary

PresenterWeston MontgomeryAgora FoundationProposedvoiceprint 0.872:31:56

Hello Council and staff and community. Different subject altogether, just today we published an interview that we had with help of Ojai that we just created last week and I sent that all to you today around five o'clock And I forgot to mention, I'm Andy Gilman with the Agora Foundation. I live on Golden West and have been in Ojai most of my life. This is really interesting this help of Ojai in that it's people who are directly working with people who are dealing with this economy that we have and our housing crisis directly every single day. I found it incredibly illuminating so you could find it on our website but it'll be... I put it on Facebook today as well but you all have it and I hope you do look at it.

Just fantastic, I think. And for anybody who doesn't know the Agora Foundation works with nonprofits and also some of the council members. I hope to interview all the council members just so you can speak at length and all the questions are agreed upon. You get the final choice of the edit and that's what happened with help of Ojai. So I encourage everybody to check it out. It's on agorafoundation.org And we have started with OUSD. It turns out they need two sessions, that's coming soon but our goal would be to share as much information as we can so that we can all make these fantastic decisions especially what's coming before you very soon which is these projects. So to hear from as many voices as we can I think will be really useful. Thanks for your time.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:33:23

Thank You Andy next we have John Drucker then Rosemary then Marissa Gonzalez

CommentJohn DruckerProposedself-stated2:33:30

Good evening, I'm John Drucker. I live in Andrew Whitman's district and practice law one block away from here and I too am here to talk about peace, peace and reconciliation. Peace and reconciliation require an acknowledgment of past wrongs and atonement starting with heartfelt apologies Now in light of the Ventura Superior Court's decision last month, I would ask at least three of you to issue such heartfelt apologies.

Starting with you Mr. Summers, I'd like you to apologize to the entire city of Ojai for misguiding everyone for months on end. You should also apologize for shouting down Leslie Rule, Robin Gerber, Wendy Larner and a number of others Madam Mayor, I'd like you to apologize for repeatedly stating as fact that Leslie and I violated the Brown Act and for repeatedly and derisively referring to me as only a cannabis attorney.

I've been a litigator for over 30 years, as you might have gathered from the judge's written decision. And Mr. Whitman, you can now apologize for repeatedly denigrating my legal skills especially since I was 100% right and your legal expert was 100% wrong. You should also apologize for your libelous statement that Leslie Rule made the disclosure she did simply in order to curry favor with the Becker Group Not to mention, apologize for lying under penalty of perjury about the DA's letter to this entire council regarding the Brown Act.

Now all of these apologies would be oh-hi-nice And unlike empty lip service to notions of peace, would actually further the cause of peace which we all value very deeply. Thank you. And now I would certainly welcome the brief remarks in response that the Brown Act allows you to make.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:35:55

Thank you, John. Next we have Rosemary and then Marissa Gonzalez. This is public comment and it's a generally one-way communication. No, that's not true. Okay. Rosemary?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:36:16

No, no, excuse me. Point of order here. Excuse me, state your point. My point of order is, the Brown Act does allow conversation between council members. So if Council Member Susie Francina would like to respond it is within the Brown Act and within her rights to do so. It's not really within your rights to say no.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:36:39

As I said generally it's a one way form of communication you can ask clarifying questions. Do you want to ask any?

CommentMarissa GonzalezProposed2:36:47

Microphone please

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:36:49

Do you want to make a

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:36:52

comment?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:36:54

Excuse me, one at a time. Can you

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:36:56

please

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:36:57

go through the chair? Mayor Pro Tem, do you want to make a comment?

CommentJourney WadehackProposedself-stated2:37:02

Microphone please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:04

I thought that Mr. Drucker, John Drucker's request was very reasonable and would do a lot to heal the divisiveness in the community if we would just, I've asked for this before, let us acknowledge that mistakes were made or you might say that you don't think that you're wrong but at least say something because it's gonna come up Why do you ignore something

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:37:37

that keeps coming up? Mayor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:38

Pro

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:37:38

Tem,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:39

if you want to make a

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:37:39

comment,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:40

that's fine. Are you finished? My comment is I also am asking that you acknowledge the mistakes that were made. Why not? We're

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:37:52

going to continue with public comment. We have Rosemary.

2:37 – 2:5033 turns

CommentRosemary HallProposedself-stated2:37:59

Hi, I only put my first name. But I'm Rosemary Hall and I just wanted to thank you all. I don't know public comment feels really just humanizing that I can Look at all of your faces and your eyes. And I keep calling every day Julia Brownlee and requesting a cease fire and requesting a response. And I feel like my voice is not being heard. I'm not being responded to.

I go to sleep every night and wake up in the morning. I'm an educator, so I work with people of all ages and a lot of children. I just can't imagine what it is like to be existing in Palestine To wake up there, to be there in the past and now. And what... The memory of this moment, what kind of impact it's going to have. And I think that this is a critical moment to step up and to do the right thing And I think that this is, as a person in Palestine being bombarded and not having water or food or electricity and existing in the rubble and knowing day in and day out That there are people in the world not asking for a cease fire is appalling.

And I hope that as you know a small city we still have a voice and can start momentum in the right direction. So thank you very much for hearing us and I hope that we will speak again and come to a conclusion with this. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:40:28

Thank you, Rosemary. Next we have Marissa Gonzalez.

CommentJourney WadehackProposedself-stated2:40:48

Microphone please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:40:50

So quickly, based on the mathematical breakdown when it comes to housing, humans are not numbers. We are people. We are all here regardless of whether we believe in God or not. We come to this earth by a higher source. We will all leave because of that higher source. We are on a planet here together. So when it comes to housing and developers, developers are into it for the money. It's a simple mathematical breakdown. They go into it regarding business. There is a certain amount of money that they're going to put out so they want a certain amount of money to come back.

So every unit that's going to be rented, they look at meeting their quotas. Once their quotas are met including their profits as years go by realistically the housing prices should go lower because their profits have already been met So we should not be looked upon as numbers and what numbers we're gonna fulfill, but to be looked at as a human race and for us as a people. As one race, not in separation by politics or governments. We are on this planet together. So the housing element realistically is pretty simple. It's just numbers so let's not make it so difficult.

And as far as the ceasefire and what's going on across the world I am indigenous to this land from being born as a native Californian. Across the Americas, my father from Mexico, my mother from El Salvador. This country was based on a genocide. So there is a global genocide that has been going on on this planet for thousands of years in this country for hundreds of years. So from my heart to yours, this is a moral foundation that we stand on The children are watching. We as adults are portraying either love or not, so the bottom line across the board is love is God and God is love.

Let's just get back to simplicity. If this was happening here in the U.S., if this was happening what's going on whether it's in Palestine, Israel, or all the other parts of the world We are one. So together, let's come together with love in love for peace, for food, air, water and shelter. Let's just make it better for all of us together. Let's stop the fighting.

Let's humble ourselves. And that's really all I have to say.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:38

Thank you Marissa. Thank you. Quiet please, thank you. Any comments online Weston?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:45

No raised hands for general public comment here.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:43:47

Okay all right well

we will move on to item number three discussion item number three introduction of four ordinances modifying the structure of the planning historic preservation arts and parks and recreation commissions do we have a staff report Mr. City Attorney

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:44:04

Briefly, so this is an item we've seen a couple times before. The ordinances before you reflect the discussion at the October 24th meeting and I'll just give a summary which is page 4 of the staff report For the Planning Commission, five commissioners. Maximum of two non-city resident commissioners if the council deems it necessary to secure specialized expertise or knowledge. Nominations to be by a committee of the mayor, a rotating council member as determined by the clerk and the commission chair.

to four-year terms with no changes to current commissioner terms, so no connection between elections and council elections in commission terms. Just whatever the terms are they'll continue as they are four year terms. For the Historic Preservation Commission seven commissioners maximum of three non city residents, the same nomination process, the mayor a rotating council member, the commission chair to make nominations to four year terms For the Arts Commission, up to seven commissioners. Here it's an allowance expressly that the council could choose to appoint five, six or seven commissioners.

That whatever number of commissioners is appointed there be a majority of city residents. Same process for nominations. The mayor, rotating council members determined by the clerk and the commission chair also to four-year terms. For the Parks and Rec Commission, seven commissioners plus one non-voting youth commissioner. Maximum of three non-city resident commissioners out of the seven.

Same nomination process by the mayor rotating council members determined by the clerk and the commission chair to four year terms with no changes or current terms and the youth commissioner Nominated by the mayor with the two-year term and certain schooling requirements. And then for all commissions, eliminated all of the quorum and residency ties so what that means is for a five member commission quorum is three, for a seven member commission quorum is four Those quorums of three or four can be built by any combination of residents or non-residents. That won't matter in determining if a commission can meet, all that will matter is are there three or four members as applicable appointed to the commission?

Removal of any commissioner would be at will by council majority vote at a regular council meeting not a special meeting but only after Two members of the council members give notice to the city manager of the intended removal who would then inform the commissioner, who would then have at least seven days to decide to resign if they so chose or to not resign and thus object. If the commissioner chose not to resign as would be fine that would be back informed to the two council members who could Choose to press it or let it go. If they chose to press it, then the commissioner up for consideration of removal would have to be given an opportunity to speak to the council before consideration of their removal at the meeting and then for any unscheduled vacancies, of course, the MATA Act applies which includes that there'll be at least 10 working days after posting notice of the unscheduled vacancy before making a final replacement commission appointment.

With that staff is available for any questions on these ordinances thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:47:31

Thank you, Matt. Any questions from Council? We have gone over this several times.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:47:37

Indeed, it's a long process but I would suggest it's an example of decision making by committee that can work successfully.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:47:43

Yes and we are very grateful to you for holding on to all the details. Happy to. No

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:49

questions?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:47:52

Mayor Pro

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:47:52

Tem? Didn't we also include that before we remove anybody that we go and talk to them? It's in there

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:48:03

he just mentioned

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:03

it

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:48:04

Yeah, so that's in there. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:06

sorry if I missed it.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:48:07

No no yeah that's in there and the requirement is that the two council members who raised the question go to the manager who would then go to the commissioner

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:15

But that's not what I understood. What am I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:48:18

missing? I thought the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:18

council members would speak if I'm observing a commission meeting and I'm unhappy with something that goes on, you know we're all free to discuss.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:48:32

You give notice to the city manager?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:48:37

And it wouldn't prevent. Microphones, please. But the process requires that at least

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:48:46

any microphone. OK,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:48:47

so the process require. So you're free to talk to any commissioner that you want about what you've observed and your concerns.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.862:48:57

Mm hmm.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:48:58

But what it does require is that whenever two council members Notify the city manager that they are interested in pursuing a removal, that the city manager is required to go talk to that person. And give them the option of resigning or having a hearing depending on their preference. That's how we've set, that's our process to hopefully avoid having full-blown hearings on switching out.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:49:43

We're still on questions

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:49:49

for

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.842:49:50

Okay, I think this will answer your question so by going through the city manager then there's a record of Then everything if it's just two council members there can be information that's misconstrued or misunderstandings and if the city manager is Is the one who is? Who is Handling that step of the process then it just keeps things Cleaner Okay, can we move on to public comments first we have Brian Eakins and then chair

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:50:26

Smitty

2:50 – 2:5816 turns

CommentBrian AkinsProposedself-stated2:50:39

Hello Council, he's back. I stand before you Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. The historic nature is the fact that I've been on this commission after we've gone around and around and around to this. So I'm happy to report that I think through the deliberations that have taken place several times this year, that you've picked off the highlights of all of the different discussions that have taken place over the years. So I am happy with this three things.

Four things thank you for getting to where we are at a second reading. I think this is a second reading. Well I'm looking at Weston.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:51:26

So this is the introduction of the ordinance and then it would come back on the 28th for a second reading in adoption. Oh, I thought this is the introduction of the whatever version number were up to revised ordinance. Okay.

CommentBrian AkinsProposedself-stated2:51:40

I don't want to use my time. Okay so second thing so With this in place or once it's in place and we'll know what that is, we will be working to get to our seven members. We are interesting to note that in this year three commissions have been, three new commissioners have been placed One there, one there and one there. So three out of five of you have actually nominated HPC commissioners. We are now at five. We had a wonderful meeting last Thursday. It was a long meeting. We were talking about some things that we're trying to get straightened out. That

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:25

was a long meeting. Now you're reminding me it was three hours.

CommentBrian AkinsProposedself-stated2:52:29

Four by the time we went. Yeah that's right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:32

okay

CommentBrian AkinsProposedself-stated2:52:33

So three, the other thing that we did that's important is we did unanimously put forth the resolution for the HPC awards for this year. For the annual awards, three individuals are receiving that and a lifetime award and so I asked that resolution go to you on the second hearing on the 28th of November So that then you can decide whether it goes forward or not, and hopefully that ought to go forward. And then the city can order the plaques and we can make that presentation in the one meeting in December. Seems rushed but I have to tell you this is the 10th year I've been involved in it every year it seems rushed. So that's item number three, and number four is again I would just like to when you finish this item today just if you could relay the time frame so that each of us commissioners or chairs know what time frame we're looking for.

But right now as I discussed with Weston, we're looking to January. So we'll see you then.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:53:37

Okay thank you. Thanks Brian. Is Smitty still here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:50

So this is my pitch for hello for you to maybe just consider changing the residence requirement for the Arts Commission only Okay, so I'll try to do my three minutes Sousa. Thank you. I loved your statements about our it wasn't your words but are sort of doing age city limit sort of requirements or Arbitrariness with how the how the city limits are and how it affects things. Well, I think it's particularly true with the Arts Commission Or the artist community I'll say anyways in the Ojai Valley Here's some just bullet points Are I mentioned last time again that our Ojai studio artists tour one of the most respected arts organizations in the town For only 14 of the 64 stops or studios were within the city limits. But I think if you saw the names of the artists, these are our Ojai artists.

There's a reason they don't live here and I think why do you think our artists live outside this city? Maybe we talked about that earlier. That's an

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:54:49

important point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:50

Secondly, our mural jury met today. Within 30 days we called a need for a mural jury to approve Summer Camp's beautiful mural. We got them together, we met today and approved it and it'll be coming back I guess through the Planning Commission but on my way out the door I said how many of you guys live in this city? Only one of the six. So, I mean we did that blind but we picked qualified people quickly to do an ad hoc thing And and that just gives you an example where we found them anyways to Sometime between now in the end of the year. I may need up to four new commissioners on the Arts Commission Nigel has tendered his resignation today and we do want to go to seven To work out our plan so Just from a selfish standpoint Smitty wants to kind of move ahead and I don't want to have to fire anyone or fire myself, I guess Our arts grants.

Let's talk about money. I asked several of you why do you have this requirement? And I haven't got a strong answer, I don't think in terms of arts anyways. For instance the Arts Grants which is our largest budget item we give there's no requirement that grant applicants be in the city limits you know because I think we already recognize Within the council and commission that transcends what any of the political instrument boundaries are. I think we're unlike the other commissions because geography doesn't reflect anything to do with our community, We would like the flexibility to be able to appoint arts commissioners from anywhere if they love Ojai and can help with our arts plan.

You'd still have a check because the council votes. Okay, if anything should change and Beatrice would or Otto Heino were alive today I would love to have them on the Arts Commission But we couldn't have them on the Arts Commission

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:57:13

Thank you Smitty any comments online Weston

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:57:19

no raised hands for item three mayor

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role2:57:21

Okay, we will move on to discussion. Who would like to begin? Mayor Pro Tem?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:25

Okay, so Smitty made the important point that I would agree that most artists probably live outside the city and which brings up it's really a question of equity too they live outside the city in part I'm I would, I think we should ponder this point under arts commissioner a commission majority of city resident commissioners. Is there some way to word that with some flexibility if the other council members might consider that change?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role2:58:21

Yeah, the council could use language similar to the Planning Commission language that there's a preference for city residents. Let me get the exact language. While it is preferred that all members of the commission have primary residence and be domiciled within the city and then either a numeric maximum or just commission members may be domiciled outside the city if determined necessary by the council That's an option, so it would be preference for city residents but not a requirement.

The other option would be just to strike the residency language entirely.

2:59 – 3:0413 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:01

I would be comfortable to not have this majority of city resident commissioners in there, to just get the best artists that are willing to volunteer their time. And then I know that You know what? What could happen with the Planning Commission and I believe this is your goal. Is that you have a planning commission That's all City residents the way it's worded now, right? That's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:59:38

it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:59:38

could be Yeah, so so I Okay, where it says maximum of two non-city resident commissioners if council deems necessary to secure specialized expertise. I think you should expand that to say that first of all, you might not get applicants that live in the city and they may not have expertise. There could be all kinds of reasons why you... I really like the idea of the Planning Commission having At least even required to have a non-city resident.

Because it's also the fact of the matter that only the rich will be able to afford to serve on these commissions, only rich people until we have affordable housing they can't you know, the housing is so much less expensive in Oakview and Miners Oaks and we're always talking about equity. So I don't know if you're still wedded to having, I know we've gone over this and I'm just as attached to my point of view as you are to yours.

But I really like having a non-city resident because the valley is so much bigger than the four point mile city limit. So maybe it will work out but maybe...I don't I don't know. But anyway, if the Council deems necessary to secure specialized expertise maybe that's the compromise that you made and I can live with it but I'm not entirely happy about it. Okay, I'm done.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:01:25

So I think that the way that we've worded the Planning Commission, I think it does open up. It does keep a flexibility there for someone outside of the city. I don't feel like it limits us from having someone within the city. I think if we had language that said we have to have one person from outside of the city then then we're limited if we don't get applications And you know, I think...

Go ahead. There might not be an expert though.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:02:06

Historically we have had to go outside the city Order to find two special skilled planning commissioners The people

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:02:17

who are described

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:02:17

in the

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:02:18

ordinance so I Wanted to make

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:02:20

one more point and that is

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:02:31

You know, I agree with you about the Arts Commission about changing the language to say something about the preference but that we're not limiting it. The Valley is just full of so many incredible artists and there's so much expertise here And we see that with our current arts commission. I think the Arts Commission is different than some of the other ones because of the specialization of it and so, I would be in favor of modifying that language and you know, the chair made a very salient point about that And with that change, I am for moving forward with this. We have really, I think we have really come together and worked together to come up with a solid ordinance and I'm very happy with the changes that we made that create a protocol for removal and for managing some of the issues that we've had just this last year.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:03:43

Okay, Council Member Whitman.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:03:47

So it sounds like the only place where there's an issue is on the Arts Commission but I can see being flexible you know Sousa said can we get some language That allows for it to be a majority of non-residents and if that's the way things fall. Agree, I'm fine with the idea that arts has a majority of Non-residents but I don't want to pass over city residents

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:04:35

Yeah,

3:04 – 3:2050 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:04:41

so my suggestion is what that we say something we leave the majority of City Resident Commissioners but a Majority of non resident commissioners Is permissible if the circumstances require it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:05:02

We

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:05:04

could certainly craft a language I might suggest for arts given its realities It may be wise to just strike the residency language Entirely for arts as distinct from the others

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:05:16

That's what I'm thinking an

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:05:18

option to consider.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:05:19

I would be in favor of that option and

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:05:22

Council Member Ruhl. Yeah, I'm in favor of that. I'm sorry to throw this monkey wrench in but as I've been thinking over these last iterations and how we got where we are, I would like to have some sort of principle or statement saying that these offices, these commissioners, these appointments are non-political We have heard the mayor say that she believes these to be political.

We have other council members who have indicated in ways, one way or another that they believe them to be political and I think it's very important that we state in principle that these are not political appointments. I think it's very dangerous to start talking about political appointments Especially when you're talking about how you've already called the planning department and I am uncomfortable leaving that open. I would like a vote on that.

I think in principle it's immensely important that we say that these are not political appointments, we don't appoint people so that they will carry out You know our political agendas, I think that is very narrow and I Think we have to make a stand one way or the other and I would like a conversation on that issue Be it yay or be it nay. Be honest be truthful And let's just go ahead and see where we stand on the issue no dancing around

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:07:03

Okay, well we'll wait for a motion. I'd like to make a comment and just to clarify what I meant was when I said they're political it's because elected officials are making appointments Let me finish please and back to the Arts Commission Thank You chair smitty for speaking on that and I agree We should be more flexible and it makes sense since most of the artists live outside of town so that the word Preference, I think Councilmember Whitman you brought that up giving preference to city residents and then you know right no limitations. And uh, I agree with the way that the Planning Commission is worded right now and I think We have this phrase in there, if council deems necessary to secure specialized expertise. And I think that protects us.

I'd also like to say thank you to all the commissioners, the chairs and the commissioners for working so hard and giving your time and expertise and love to our community. It's just a great boon to all of us. So thanks to all the commissions And also thank you to our staff, particularly Matt Summers for it's been a bit of an endurance race. And I really appreciate my council members, my colleagues for putting in the time and the effort User-friendly ordinance. So is there anyone who would like to make a motion? Yes

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:08:32

I will but I also wanted to speak to what you mentioned because I am I also I agree This is very and it's very important that we That these that we let the community know that We're not making political decisions that we really value that amazing wealth of knowledge and expertise of the people in our commissions who are serving And I want to just also go back and say that when we decided on the selection process, and we decided to have it be a committee selection process between the mayor, one council member who is rotating, and the chair, that protocol was specifically for the reason of separating politics from commission appointments.

So I don't necessarily feel that we need specific language about this not being political, because if we have three individuals who are two elected one volunteer making the selection together. I feel like there's a collaboration that's inherent within that process, but I'm open if anyone else wants to change that language.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:09:45

So you said exactly what I was going to say we've changed the selection process so that it now is not an individual selecting the person of their choice. It's now three people that are making this selection and And I also think it would be virtually impossible to enforce a no political selection. What would be the criteria for saying, that selection was political? No, that one was not.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:10:17

Are you finished? Yeah,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:10:20

okay. I'm just saying as a general principle because we did have it in the paper where the mayor said I believe this to be a political process and there is a impression that the removal of Jeffrey Starkweather was a political decision whether or not... It's not an argument whether or not you want to agree it was or it wasn't There is certainly the impression that it was a political dismissal.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:10:51

And- I'm going to ask the council member to refrain from bringing up the past and just focus on this agenda

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:10:58

item. Point of order, Mayor, I'm going to have to ask you not to be ridiculous, not to bring up the past, the last things that this is part of. We're going to focus on the ordinance and I'm talking about the ordinance and I'm talking about why I think it's very important that we have a statement of principle this was all of a month ago. Two months ago so when you talk about the past that was in the front page of the paper.

Okay and so you we may decide you may decide

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:27

ask you to stay in the present

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:11:29

moment I am in the present moment excuse me Mary Would you like to in a position? No,

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:39

you can appeal the chair's ruling.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:11:40

Yeah, I will appeal

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:42

I'm

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:11:42

gonna

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:42

appeal

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:11:43

the chairs ruling so that I can finish my conversation Because the mayor doesn't want to talk about the past it was two months ago

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:11:49

Could you please make a motion if you want

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:11:51

yeah, I made a motion I'm going to appeal the mayor's decision that I not continue with this Conversation and is there a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:12:00

I'll second. Okay, but don't go on and on.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:12:05

I will make it brief. Well then we have to have a roll

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:12:10

call for that.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:12:12

There's a

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:12:12

motion and a second.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:12:17

Let me just make a suggestion maybe this will make everybody happy maybe it won't Why don't we, we've spent so many hours on this. Why don't we approve what we have with the one modification for the arts. If council member rule wants to bring forward a policy for the city council to adopt. That is going to be some type of a guidance in the selection process.

Then, you know, let's do that at some future point when you've figured out what language you want to propose to us.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:12:54

I will accept that and but I also went to say to the mayor, Do not try to censor me. Do not say that something had happened two months ago was in the past.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:13:04

You're out of order. You're out of order. Can we have a motion here? Is somebody ready for a motion, I'll make a motion. Thank you.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:13:12

Um, I will move To adopt this ordinance with the language modifications for the Arts Commission that we discussed

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:13:22

Yes, oh,

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:13:26

I'm sorry thank you so much city attorney

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:13:28

okay and we have a second yes, okay roll call please I have a question

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:13:32

Discussion point. Um, when did this ordinance start? When did we start with this ordinance? Like was it two months ago three months ago

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:13:40

staff report has the dates It goes back to May of 23

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:13:44

may have 23 does that count as the past

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:13:47

actually goes back farther? It's April 11th.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:13:49

Does that count as the past just out of curiosity? Okay Thank you very much. Okay.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:13:54

Can we have a roll call please question? I

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:13:57

Yes, and I'll ask City Attorney is it the striking of

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:14:00

the... Yeah my understanding of the motion is that it's to introduce the four ordinances for the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission, the Parks and Rec Commission, and the Arts Commission with one change in section 4-16.101 for the Arts Commission created to strike the sentence that reads a majority of the commission shall be residents of the city such as the arts commissions or flexibilities to residency

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:14:24

All right, we have a roll

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
call. Understood. Roll call. Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes. Mayor Stixx? Yes Council Member Whitman? Yes Council Member Lange? Yes Council Member Ruhle? Yes

Wonderful motion passes 5-0 all right

we will move on to item number four introduction of an ordinance adopting a local tenant preference policy for lower income deed restricted affordable housing We have a staff report Mr. City Attorney

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:14:52

Yes, one moment to switch from A to B. What's before you is a proposed ordinance that would adopt SB 649, Senate Bill 649, local tenant preference, again rental focus. A policy allowed by state law. State law, as you know, allows in a somewhat limited text to state law, a city to adopt a preference policy for persons who are lower income and residing in a neighborhood in the community experiencing significant displacement with that being people who are experiencing significant displacement pressures and gentrification due to rapid growth or increasing housing prices It allows cities to adopt a tenant preference, not requirement, preference policy for applicable rental housing projects. And what's proposed is a policy embodied really in the exhibit A to the ordinance that would provide for an affordable housing project owner to provide preference to de-restricted affordable housing tenancy applicants who meet a couple of qualifications They reside at the time of their application, and at least three months before in the Ojai area of interest or sphere of influence.

So that means the city limits plus the sphere of influence which is the area that the city per LAFCO is likely eventually to annex into. and the sphere of influence, which is the larger area as defined by the Ventura County Local Agency Formation Commission for what parts of the county are appropriately within the oversight of the cities. We don't have land use power in this sphere of influence but per the city-county deal from about 20 years ago, longer than that 40 years ago, the county's required to consult with the city on major land use decisions So it's expanding to that, which is roughly the Ojai Valley. It picks up Casita Springs, Miner's Oaks, the East End and the City of Ojai. And the mapping is available on the city's website.

So live in that area. Are income eligible households for the applicable deed restriction? This goes back to the prior point. If it's a very low unit they're very low-income. If it's a low-income unit they're low-income. I'd like And the idea was to bake in flexibility, mindful that depending on the funding source for a destricted affordable unit they might already be required to do a lottery or they might be prohibited from doing a lottery. It might only be first come first serve. It might be first come first serve with paper applications.

We wanted to preserve maximum flexibility in this draft to reflect that we don't know how each of the projects will come forward, but to preserve flexibility. So that's baked in that language there requiring development of a policy and also in Section 6 by which the Council if approved would delegate to the Community Development Director The power to approve an alternative tenant selection plan that would affirmably further affordable housing opportunities for lower-income persons experiencing significant displacement pressures. Again, trying to bake in some flexibility to allow the mechanics to be worked out project by project but the idea to be a preference for persons who are lower income live in the Ojai area of interest or sphere of influence and are facing displacement pressure.

I would note, this is where my earlier comment is applicable. I agree with the two suggestions by Ms. Barbara McCree-Ortiz, the attorney for Cabrillo. Those two suggestions are in section four that the evidence of residency be for proof of residency not at the city but in a sphere of influence or the Ojai area of interest to match the residency sections, make section four and section three match. And then second, in section six that it be alternative tenant selection plan that would affirmably further fair housing as opposed to affordable housing opportunities for lower income persons. And the distinction there is to pick up the reality that all of this is still subject to state and local and federal fair housing laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of any protected category, race, national origin, veteran status et cetera.

We of course would not violate those policies. So with that

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:19:31

go back to six sure you just covered and tell me which words would go out and which would go in

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:19:38

Sure, so it's I'll just read this the I'll read it full section 6 City Council approval of exemption director approval of alternative compliance plan The city council may at its discretion approve an affordable housing project as exempt from this policy The City Council hereby delegates the power to the Community Development Director to, at his or her discretion, approve an alternative tenant selection plan that affirmatively furthers fair instead of affordable housing opportunities for lower-income persons experiencing significant displacement pressures.

3:20 – 3:2833 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:20:10

Did you say that was section six?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:20:12

Yes, I'm sorry. Section 6 of the policy which is on page 4-7.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:20:18

It's Exhibit A which is not

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:20:22

section 6 of the ordinance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:20:24

Okay. Sorry about that. Yeah,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:20:26

I was focusing on the policy. And with that staff does anyone have any questions? Okay

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:20:32

Councilmember Whitman

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:20:34

Did you model this off of some other municipality's effort to do this?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:20:42

I did with a couple of source documents. There are a number of cities that have adopted similar policies, they range from very complex to very simple. We sort of stuck on the simpler end mindful that we have different kinds of affordable housing projects and need to make it flexibility. The models we looked at were Pasadena, South Pasadena, Berkeley and one or two more in the Bay Area that I forget but can email the council. We tried to look at a couple of different samples

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:21:12

When there one of the more complex ones that you looked at. What type of issues were they addressing in theirs that we're not addressing here?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:21:23

The more complex ones pick it up in a couple categories. One is they break apart the preferences And most of them were adopted before SB 649 and either tap into earlier city-specific laws or tap into the general, they tap into city funded affordable housing where the city's landlord can be more restrictive as long as it doesn't violate the fair housing laws.

So they break apart preference for people who live in a given area and they break it apart by how long they've lived in the area, exactly what part of the area they live in at what level of where are they on the experiencing significant displacement scale. Are they currently unhoused? Recently unhoused? At significant risk? At moderate risk sort Break apart those sets of categories. The other one that some cities would do is break apart based on if they are a family with children, that comes ahead of singletons sort of aspects of their circumstances and break it apart.

And the other aspect that you see from the more complex policies is mandating a lottery and then having very detailed provisions governing those lotteries.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:22:38

We're proposing to leave that type of an issue up to the community development director, to work with the owner of the project and devise a plan that is fair.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:22:51

And if the idea would be up to the developer or the own project owners to devise a plan and then present it to the city for approval? And that would likely be a conversation. And the idea is to bake in some flexibility because of one, two aspects. One we don't yet know what will work for the developers in our smaller community and two with the kinds of projects were likely to see that this would apply to are going to be in two flavors De-restricted units with private financing, as is common for a 20 unit project that has 5% very low income.

That would be one very low income unit. That's private financing. They're not using the tax credit financing and so they have more flexibility in how they structure these things versus 100% affordable 80 unit project. That's going to be almost certainly tax credit financed which has a whole bunch of more restrictive requirements imposed by their taxing entities.

We're trying to bake in flexibility depending on how we get on a de-restricted affordable unit.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:23:53

So I have one last question and that is it sounds like typically we're dealing with a much bigger city and so there are zones within the city or it's more geographic It seems like in the case of Ojai, the entire city boundaries are potentially at risk. The risk factor is more. The income level and the amount of

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:24:31

circumstances of the person. Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:24:33

yeah, the market rate for rents so is are we at any risk if we don't address that issue or or I don't think we're at risk. Maybe do we make, should we make a finding? The

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:24:54

key there is that income isn't a protected class. Part of the idea of looking at this as more than just the pure city limits is the fact that our city demographically is of a certain sort and we want to avoid risk under fair housing laws where a policy that could be viewed as a preference for a certain sort is potentially at risk The valley is a different demographic that's more reflective of the county as a whole, somewhat more reflective of the county as a whole. And it's broad enough that there is a greater defensibility there. Got

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:25:27

it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:25:29

Mayor Pro Tem? Okay I have to confess I didn't read this as closely as I would've liked. No worries. So I want to know does it address the people that work here that are now commuting especially

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:25:44

This policy does not. This is structured to match the SB 649 structure, which is tied to persons who are residents of an area and facing displacement risk. Some cities have expanded it to capture in other policies have expanded it to capture people who work in an area we didn't draft that based on the council's direction to adopt go with six SB 649 for this draft

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:26:11

OK, because we want to make sure that we do address that because where people are arguing that this is going in any housing is going to increase traffic. And our counter argument is that can people who are now commuting will be able to live here? You know, so we want to make sure that it's addressed somewhere. The other thing that keeps popping into my mind is because we currently don't have affordable housing. There's quite a number of people who've lived here for decades that are now living in Fillmore or God knows where who would love to die in Ojai, you know? Do you have a question?

Oh, is that for later? We're still on

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:26:52

questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:26:53

Okay. So okay, my question is are we addressing that

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:26:59

So there's two questions inherent in there. Are we addressing the situation of persons who lived in Ojai before but have been displaced? This ordinance does not pick them up, this picks it up if persons are at risk of displacement but haven't yet been displaced. That language could be adjusted to allow for people who reside or have resided Within the X amount of time before that could be adjusted to pick it up if the council desires Okay, the other point if I can make one key factual clarification There are deed restricted affordable units existent in the city right now In two category two places. There's a small project on Was Montgomery that's owned by Cabrillo and run by Cabrillo. I believe it has a very long wait list, but it does exist.

And there's also Whispering Oaks run by the Ojai Area Housing Authority owned by the county. So there are existing-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:00

Those are long wait

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:28:01

lists. I realize the wait list is long, but I don't want state regulators who are listening to think that we don't have any affordable housing. We do have existing deed restricted affordable housing. It's just also occupied.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:28:12

All right, any other questions from council? Council

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:28:16

Member Burwell. So but the folks that are on the waiting list at either Montgomery Oaks or Whispering Oaks they really wouldn't be unless they were already Ojai residents this does not really capture them and or I mean...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:35

But that's what we want to do! We can capture them. We can change the language one at a time. To the people on the waiting lists You

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:28:43

know

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:28:44

I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:28:45

Okay, we can talk about it during discussion. I think that there are some issues around that that I'd like to discuss any other questions from

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:28:51

Council All right. We will move on to public comment first. We have Larry Steingold then Bill Miley then Nora Harold

3:29 – 3:336 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:29:00

Larry Steingold, city resident. I support SB 649 any way you do it. Okay? How you cut and slice and try to put an elephant through a needle, I don't care. Okay? You're city councilors, you're the mayor. City residents, Ojai residents, the valley influence the whole bit. Show that you care about the people who live here. You have Nora Herald, who said she has to relocate.

Okay? You have people here who were pre-COVID that they now have had to get out because prices went up. They got thrown out. Those people count. People who had to leave and maybe they want to come back—they count. The people on the list who live in Ojai—they count. You can put it all together but pass it tonight and then do what you do with every other law. Make the change in a month.

Make the adaptation, make the review, make whatever you have to do but pass it tonight so you get it on the books. So 649 residents in Ojai get picked first or have preference and then maybe give a time limit. Give people who live within the city three weeks to sign up. Give the next tranche three more weeks and then just keep expanding the wheel or the vortex, whatever you want to call it. Spiral. But seriously, OK? Pass it tonight. Get it done. Show that you represent the city, the people who put you in office, the voters, the city residents. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:30:36

Thank you, Larry. Next we have Bill Miley, then Nora Harold, then Andy Gilman.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated3:30:45

Good evening. For the record, my name is Bill Maher. It's a good state law and I want to give credit to the council members that placed this on the agenda. Do you know our housing element has a chart that shows 50% plus or minus of our renters are cost burdened? They're paying more than 30% of their household income for rent? 600.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:31:17

Try 100%.

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated3:31:18

600 families are cost burdened in this town, and they're all eligible under 649. Several issues arise. One arises. Defining who is at risk of the housing displacement. As I read the state law, there's no clear definition. What exists is and I wrote you this and I said see below chapter 1276 It's the policy of the state of California that lower income individuals residing in neighborhoods and communities experience significant displacement pressures and gentrification due to rapid growth and increasing housing prices need access to housing that is affordable, and it assists those households in avoiding displacement. That's the description.

How do you determine who? And then it goes on to talk about the base is 30% and overpayment. However, for rent seems to be the key factor plus the three months requirement for being in the city. How are the applicants gonna be managed? Lottery, attorney spoke to them. Time limits by dates, family sizes, how will folks be notified? Who approves the selection process? Who oversees the process of selection?

Maybe the developer's wife selects them, I don't know or husband or kid, I don't know. Do folks with lower incomes down on this chart get preference based on the affordable housing units classification? If it was approved for very low, only those who would be eligible for very low would win. Summary, the intent is really good. It seems the application is complicated in being openly fair and equitable.

I read in the law that its basis is state and federal Fair housing laws. That's serious. I want to suggest that our real estate board and our Chamber of Commerce be involved in drafting the protocols. Thank you. Thank you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:33:52

Bill. 600 families would be eligible. Next we have Nora Harold then Andy Gilman

3:34 – 3:4628 turns

CommentJohn DruckerProposed · by introduction3:34:01

I completely support the passing of this. I hope that you will include all residents of the Ojai Valley in whatever way works. You know, if you have to do city first, fine, that makes sense. This is the city but then you expand it out so I really support that. The Becker project would not have solved my housing needs. I want to be clear, there was nothing affordable in that for me.

The bullying I saw here tonight by Sousa, you do it with a smile on your face. The bullying I saw here tonight by Sousa, you do it with a smile on your face but it's still bullying. And Leslie when you raise your voice and point does not create a safe space for any of you or any of us.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:34:56

I have to say Nora neither do you. Neither do you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:35:02

We don't attack our speakers.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:35:07

I'm not attacking her unless she's attacking me, since all I'm doing is responding to her.

CommentJohn DruckerProposed · by introduction3:35:16

Well, I got up here and I said what I said and then you both demonstrated those behaviors. You know when I came up to talk about the way I'd been treated here by Sousa and other members of the community Andy and Betsy and Rachel sat there and did not say a word They didn't look at Sousa and say, yeah, Sousa you should apologize. It's not okay when you do it. You don't have your council members backs publicly! It's not okay when you do it. It is violence.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:35:53

Thank you Nora. Next we have Andy Gilman.

PresenterWeston MontgomeryAgora FoundationProposedvoiceprint 0.873:36:01

Very briefly I support this 100% in principle. I think it's what we have to do Matt if I understood you correctly, I would love us to pass it tonight. I think Larry suggested that and If that means that there is the flexibility if I understood you right so that we can pass it tonight I favor that very much instead of Taking months figuring out a large hierarchy So working with each individual project what they can do and what they can't that's gonna be necessary I love the valley-wide idea And Sousa, I'm with you 100% with people who don't live here anymore or people who work here but don't live here. But there's if I heard Cabrillo correctly there's a long wait list and we're going to have to go with some objective criteria obviously we all know that.

And I think I want to respond to what Nora brought up, too. In that Help of Ojai video they mentioned, which I think you all know, there's no one project that's going to solve this problem. It's a bunch of projects, it's websites, it's making everything that's available known as much as possible. So there is not going to be one solution. There are going to be many solutions. So I hope you do pass it tonight with the flexibility that we can work with each project and then bring it to you to decide.

You get to approve if it's going to work or not, but I love the idea of us looking to our citizens first. I think we all agree with that, but let's not overly delay to try to include every possibility. My suggestion. Thanks.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:37:29

Thank you Andy any comments online Weston?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:37:33

No bear, but let's give the option If any zoom attendants would like to speak on item four, please raise your hand now And nobody stands

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:37:43

All right, we will move on to discussion who would like a councilmember rule

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:37:47

yeah I'm going to start because I found this ordinance by reading through 162 housing laws And I brought this up eight months ago the past so I'm incredibly pleased and I want to thank Matt for this Absolutely fine job. This is a great job that you've done And I know that it wasn't easy and I did not realize that you would expand your horizons to look at towns, cities that have done this. And I know that city produced projects are able to do this much easier so I am really pleased that after eight months that this has finally made it here.

When I first started thinking about this oh so long ago, it really was because in my district which is a lot of rentals people were losing their housing. The houses were being sold and the individuals that had lived there with affordable rents were being booted And I could see, you know, I knew what houses were rentals and I knew that it was only a matter of time until the shoe dropped. And these were people that I ended up knowing, walking with, talking to.

So that was the intent for me, was to keep it very local. To start protecting the people in town who because of the change after COVID would and you know they would have an option. And I don't...I understand what's going on here that you know I hadn't even thought sphere of influence, and I might not even agree but given your rationalization for why or your justification for why sphere of influence then I definitely do agree because we do need to protect ourselves from any kind of blowback or litigation.

But to everyone's point, I would like to move this forward and it would be my druthers to move this forward with keeping it within our sphere of influence and people that do lose their housing. If there are local residents that are on the waiting list, you know, Montgomery Oaks but really it was to give some sort of reassurance to people who were living in homes that were just waiting for that shoe to drop You know, and to try to take away some of that stress from their life. That if that shoe does drop there's an option for them that doesn't send them into you know another state, another county or whatever so It would be my druthers, like I said, to keep it as confined as we can to people in the Ojai Valley who lose their housing.

Rather than if you have housing in Fillmore, you can come back or something like that. We don't have that many units. We have 49... You know, we don't know how many units we have but we don't have endless units. We have very limited units. Very limited. Council Member Lang?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:41:01

Yes, I also agree with Larry Andy and all and Councilmember rule and all who spoke on behalf of adopting this as soon as possible. Every day we have people like Nora and John losing their home We don't want to lose the members of our community. It's heartbreaking. So I am for adopting this tonight and then making modifications. I like the idea of opening this to the sphere of influence, to keeping it in the Ojai Valley.

Am interested in in councilmember or in mayor pro tem Francine's Point about people who work here Like people who work at the end. I'm wondering if there is a way that we can incorporate language around that too so work live And and people who have been displaced within a five year, like three to five year period of time. I'm open to suggestions on that, but I think we need to time cap it or like cap the time for displacement, you know, so that yeah, so that it keeps it fair.

So can we do that?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:42:29

I mean, one option would be to say that the preference is expanded to include folks who reside or work in the area of interest or sphere of influence. Or resided within it in some defined period of time in the past three years, five years, one year pick a number. The other option there would be to set it as two step. Step one is a preference for folks who reside now in the area of interest and sphere of influence. Preference two would be persons who work in those areas or who resided within the last five years but don't currently reside.

That would be another way to get there.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:43:13

I like that. Um, I like the two-step and then also i'm thinking that if we are going to cap the year That if we if we keep it at at five years that um that captures anyone who might have been displaced during covet so So, uh, you know that takes us back to 2019 And I think that that would be a reasonable time frame

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:43:39

Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:43:43

if I if I understand this We can redesign that preference Each time we have a project that we approve

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:43:58

we'd have to rewrite the policy but right so the approach here is adopt a policy at the council level and And then staff work with the developers as we go to approve how they're going to mechanically comply with that policy. Okay,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:44:15

so

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:44:16

of course council could prove something is exempt

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:44:18

yeah okay so my thoughts about I do think we should adopt this tonight

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:44:25

and I should note on that front it's introduction it isn't order for me so

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:44:28

we're not adopting

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:44:29

but it's moving forward so being reduced tonight yeah

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:44:31

so I think that the issue of capturing people who have been forced out of the community and are now somewhere else. Is not just how long ago were they forced out, but it's how long did they live in Ojai? Yes. So I don't want to give a preference to somebody who lived here for a year. I want to give preference to somebody who may have lived here you know, I'd say 10 years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:45:08

Yeah

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:45:09

and then that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:45:09

was

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:45:10

my intention and then depending on You know depending on how many years potentially you know affect how far back you can go to qualify them. I do also though like the idea of giving preference to current Ojai residents first because we're trying to keep people housed here in the community and I, you know as far as people who are currently working here but aren't residents here.

I would love to see us figure out how to get the employers involved in helping us provide them with housing solutions because I mean, I always think towards the idea that people who live here are paying the taxes. Our taxes are going into supporting even if it's a non-profit that comes in we're still paying for infrastructure when we you know built we gotta have streets, And I think it's important for us to make sure that we're doing the right thing.

3:46 – 3:5223 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:46:42

Do we have any potential litigation issues if we were to prioritize local residents over the sphere of influence, or is that close enough? Because that's why we initially expanded the sphere of influence to keep us safe from fed fair housing laws. And so I just want to check back in with you before we move on. Yeah, I mean the concern

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:47:07

is our demographics are very- Right. Of a certain sort. And that would be the concern. I think there's, it's not indefensible if it's city first then sphere then area of interest but it's more defensible if it's all of those equal.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:47:23

Okay so that's just something we have to grapple with. Something to bear in mind as part of the risk analysis. Okay thank you and I didn't mean to interrupt I just wanted to clarify.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:47:29

Chair Pro Tem? Yeah so your excellent point about getting the employers involved. So the school district right is looking at housing and their buildings And then at one point, the Ojai Valley Inn was supposed to build housing for the employees but they wiggled out of it by getting those apartments on what's it called? Country Club Drive and they displaced tenants that were in there to put their people in there. So we don't want to make that mistake again but we can go back and have another conversation find out how many people are commuting to the Ojai Valley Inn And whatever their wages are, and then they're taking a bus home at night or driving. So these are issues that we need to grapple with and I'm sure that the Oaks Hotel would love to have a conversation with us about providing housing for their employers.

So that's just a statement I wanted to make.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:48:32

Thank you colleagues for your insights and I'd like to thank Councilmember Rule for bringing this to our attention and doing the research, so thank you. And I'd also like to thank the comments from Larry and Bill and Nora and Andy To pass this or to at least introduce it tonight, and we can always You know We can wiggle with it in the future But the intent is really good. And of course once again It comes back to taking care of people who really need to be taken care of here and these are community members And yes, current Ojai residents first. I think that's a good idea and five years seems like pretty reasonable but let's not delay, I would say and yeah it's another thing we can do to help so are you ready for a motion? Are

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:49:26

you ready? Yeah, I want some assistance from Matt because I think he pointed out Uh, Council member rule appropriately brought up the issue and Matt addressed it which is that if we put a firm preference for residents, we potentially are going to be sued for unfair housing or some type of discrimination. I mean, I had a conversation with Steve Bennett about this issue before this was adopted and he said You know, you can't give preference. You'll get sued if you give preference to your local residents but the developers, wrong term, whatever the housing project is they do have a certain amount of flexibility in their selection process but I think we have to let Matt Look at the extent to which we can in court. We can wait it towards The residents Factor, I mean I'm kind of envisioning like the the lot NBA lottery where he You get a certain number of balls depending upon you know how many years you you've lived here or?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:51:07

My suggestion would be that we not micromanagement micro-managed at that level, right? I think them them if we get if we design the 14 page handbook for the lottery We invite risk. Yeah, I think adopt a policy statement of the council level and then the details will come project by project Okay, it'd be my strong recommendation

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:51:28

So what does your motion statement need to say? that That allows you to draft the language that provides us the most protection from unfair claims while still trying to weight this towards our

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:51:53

city residents. I'm not sure that we can have a straight wait for city residents over area of interest, I would recommend that we keep that equal

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:52:01

okay

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:02

That's the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:03

most defensible. And we should do that. Isn't that what this is? SB 649, that's what the bill is. The

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:10

difference is between local versus city resident.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:14

Supporting local tenant preferences.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:16

What does local mean? Okay. What does the word local mean? That's the issue. Is local to four square miles or is local the valley?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:52:24

Well, is it? Yes. Well, I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:29

suggest suggesting maybe we get just the city that invites some risk on the federal for housing loss and my recommendation would be keep it at the valley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:37

Yeah. OK, I agree with that

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:52:38

recommendation and I hear

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:40

you're accepting. I'm

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:52:41

fine

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:52:41

with that. OK.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:52:42

OK who would like to make a motion that Leslie should make a motion?

3:52 – 3:5822 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.863:52:48

I make a motion that we adopt with the adaptations and modifications that we have spoken of, and I'm sure either Matt or Wes can enumerate them. And that we move forward with passing this. Is

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:53:06

there a second? I'll second it. All right. Roll call please Weston.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:53:11

Yeah, I'd just like for the record to state the three parts. The live,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:53:17

work and displaced. So as I understand it, the adjustments are as follows. Two simple ones first. Section four evidence of residency is the area of interest or sphere of influence not the city. Section six replace fair for affordable in that last sentence. And the larger point for section three in the policy that it be revised to be the two-step current Ojai area of interest or sphere of influence residents first, second preference persons who work in in the area or sphere of influence or who were displaced from it within the past five years and who meet the other income qualifications etc.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:54:01

But I'd like to tag on and lived I'd either say five years or ten years. It lived at least five years or lived at least 10 years, you know? Okay, well that actually is my

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:54:15

preference Ten years yeah, that's fine.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:21

Okay. All right roll call please Weston.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Yes Councilmember Lang yes Mayor Stix? Yes. Council Member Ruhl? Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes, Mayor Pro Tem Francina? Yes!
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:33

Motion passes.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:33

Okay all right motion passes 5-0 okay council we do have one more item we generally don't start new items after 10 o'clock it's after 1030 So it's totally how well, you know we have people waiting for I see that

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:54:51

so Council we may be able to handle this one fairly quick.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:54

Okay, let's go. I'm up for it And

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:54:57

thank you all for enduring

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:54:58

and You're still here. Yay! Okay, all right so item number five discussion proposed 25 miles per hour citywide speed limit. Could we have the staff report?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:55:17

Very brief staff report on this one standing in as is perhaps obvious for Mark although the report reflects the memo that I and my team wrote. I can't take all the credit. The gist of this here is state law allows for lower speed limits in certain circumstances. They can be summarized as school zones, hospital zones, certain local streets that have meet size requirements and new law allows for additional lower speed limits in quote safety corridors is defined by Caltrans Areas that are adjacent to land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, particularly those from vulnerable pedestrian groups which is children, seniors, persons with disabilities etc.

And then areas where the highway is contiguous to a local business activity district meet some size and shape requirements And he has sort of three of the following four criteria. Half, half of the fronting property is retailer dining commercial establishments with that open directly onto the sidewalks parking space along the highway traffic signals or stop signs at certain intervals and crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device just marked Subject to precision, most of the VMU, the C1 and the BP zones fit those requirements.

Staff recommends that the council authorize staff to hire a consulting traffic engineer to assess in detail the areas of the city, the new laws and run the math, run the matrix to figure out where can we lower the speed limit and to what level and with what supporting documents? And then not to do it yet but to come back to the council with the plan For here's what we can do, here's where we can, here's where we can't.

And here's how to do it in a budget and a scope of work and then return that to the council for consideration and authorization to go do the work. So the approval of I'd recommend Mark says was up to 30,000 for the traffic consultant to do the first piece of the work which would be to develop the plan for where we might be able to do it and then the second piece would be to approve yeah go forth and conquer And lower this Go forth and lower speed limits.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:57:41

Who are we hiring for this?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:57:43

We don't have a consultant developed yet It would be to direct staff to go Find an appropriate consultant.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:57:49

Okay. All right,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:57:50

I'll be a consulting traffic engineer would be the professional We don' t have a specific person in mind

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:57:55

yet. Okay Yeah, we're on questions

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:57:59

So if we hire him or her, we don't necessarily have to do what they recommend.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:58:06

Absolutely.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:58:07

Because they could be very old school. They could not have children or dogs or any experience walking. Obviously it was the traffic engineers who caused these problems.

3:58 – 4:0420 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:58:20

Certainly staff and most of it was also state law certainly staff would identify consultants that understand and are familiar with these new laws and not just apply the old rules.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role3:58:32

Okay, okay any other questions?

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.843:58:35

Yes if so I'm thinking about the cost of the traffic engineer Is there a world in which we could do this by public survey instead of by hiring a traffic engineer? For example, getting the community involved in letting us know what streets are affected. We've had so many people come and talk about the traffic on their streets Is there a world in which we could avoid that $30,000 expense and and do this internally I'm

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role3:59:21

not sure that our exist. And the reason is I For some of these requirements we still have to have a speed survey and then we tear off of that, lower not higher. And for others of these areas the fact that the residents have lived experience of high levels of speed and high levels of unsafe traffic is in itself part of the statutory criteria. So we would need to develop professional evidence. We could look at what we can do with in-house staff, but as you know our in-house staff is severely limited.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:59:55

There's one other issue too and that is that... You can be sued for an accident caused by setting your speed limit incorrectly You can be sued for setting the wrong speed limit and argued that you caused the accident by setting the wrong speed limit. But if you have an engineer study it, and then set that limit We're primarily immune from that. Can we tap

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:00:30

into design immunity on that front?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:00:32

Okay, that's worth 30,000.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:00:35

It is worth 30,000

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:00:36

but we're still on questions Mayor Pro Tem

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:00:39

you have a question? The goal is I mean we know the streets that are problematic we already know Yeah, right. I mean I know it by heart because we've been working some of us have been working on this for about 20 years that we've stood on the corner and past public works people were working on it so but now we're going to make a fresh start we're really gonna do it okay

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:01:05

I think the reality on that front is it's not, we don't know which streets are the problem. It's which of these laws can we use to attack which of those streets? How do we fit these sort of, to use an analogy The law has given us a number of new keys. We need to identify which keys fit into the locks we have, which are our streets and how we can use this key for that lock and that key for that lock if that makes sense. Maybe that's a little broken.

The other piece I would note is I think that part of this process Will absolutely include a robust public engagement in public. Yes, and that was I should have noted also in the staff report is an outreach plan and an engagement planned a make sure that we cover as much as we can cover. And some of this might be that solutions other than lowering the speed limit are applicable for a given street.

There's lots of, we all know the menu of speed, traffic calming options. And those may make sense for other streets. Hey, we looked at this street, we can't lower the speed limit but we can do this instead. And the staff report also notes that Cuyama is one that I think already under analysis and again would be part of this puzzle and we can name the other streets, all your major streets really. Then the only other thing to note that I should have noted The same laws apply to Caltrans for Ojai Avenue Maricopa Highway, but we can't force them. It's a request

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:02:29

First we have Larry Steingold then Bill Miley then Tina Brumund

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:02:41

Larry Steingold, Ojai resident. I feel like I should be up there. No, I don't think so. You

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:02:47

might get your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:02:47

chance someday.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:02:49

Be careful what you wish for!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:02:51

If you establish the baseline of 25 miles an hour for the whole city and then go okay Grand Avenue is already 30. The Arbolada should be 15 or 20 whatever that is Everything else is 25. Yes, okay I mean where else is there? I mean maybe Bryant could be 20 for trucks and stuff but it doesn't matter it's 25 it's not going to go any higher except for one road which is grand unless they repave it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:03:20

Wait, are you saying it's that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:03:23

I mean grants already 30 miles an hour. Yes Everywhere else is 25 except for daily which is 30 and then some mix-and-match And then the Arbolada and then everybody else can come here and say hey My streets really bad lower at the 20 and here all the neighbors and here are all the reasons but vote on establishing a baseline of saying okay citywide 25 and then we'll adapt it as we go forward after this study after Just like everybody else. Yeah, but just pass a law or pass say whatever you want to pass and just get it done and move forward because what we're doing is spinning wheels right? Oh and more traffic bumps because that's what's going to happen or traffic pillows.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:04:06

Thank You Larry next we have Bill Miley then Tina Brumund and then Delaney Labar.

4:04 – 4:104 turns

Commentmy name is BillProposedself-stated4:04:15

Hello for the record my name is Bill Miley I have read the new state law and the administrative commentary. I know about research studies showing less damage to pedestrians, motorists and others when speeds are lowered. You don't die as often when you're hit at 20 miles per hour than when you're hit Ojai is a small city with narrow streets, narrow streets in places.

Park cars on both sides. of neighborhood streets. Sightlines and passing distances can be close. Downtown Manila Street is risky, parking, crossing pedestrians including crossing at non-crosswalk places, corner parking lot congestion and a north signal entrance to the parking lot. I support the proposed plan for A highway street engineering study and certainly support making our overall speed limit 25 miles an hour.

Grand Avenue should be maxed at 25, Maricopa at 30, Drowned Avenue from Grand to Olay Avenue at 20. It's a very narrow street I drive it all the time at 22 miles an hour The Grand Avenue Park Road intersection, you know just north of Sarasota Park is still at uncertain times very dangerous. Recently I was in my car at the stop sign on Park Road going north stopped when a pickup truck going west from Gridley drove through the stop sign at full speed and it's been going on for years on occasion.

So let's make our city safer for all. And based on commentary just recently, 10-5 minutes ago, please don't move ahead with just council members' opinions. The goal is to make Ojai Street safer. It needs to be traffic engineered It's a science and it needs to be objective. Please hire traffic engineering, thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:07:04

Thank you Bill. Next we have Tina Bruman then Delaney LaVar and then Doug LaVarr.

CommentDoug LaVarrProposed · by introduction4:07:13

Hello, I'm here to talk about traffic. I am a resident of Creek Road not of the city but the city travels through Creek Road to get to the city. I've had ongoing problems in dealing with the county so i'm actually going to surprise all of you. I am not in support of this because this just pushes the problem elsewhere so we need to take a step back We have a true issue in Ojai, in the entire valley and it's a couple fold. First is back in the 80s when we moved away from city police and had a contract with the Sheriff's Department, we've carved out The amount of money that we pay and the Sheriff's Department does not provide services for traffic enforcement. So it doesn't really matter what speed limit you make the traffic, right? It doesn't matter what you post it when no one tickets it.

That's not their responsibility because you're not paying them for it. pay them for the service, they'll enforce the speed whatever it is. But when the city negotiates a contract back in the 80s and carves it out we don't have that enforcement service so this stuff is lip service. It's lip service what we really have going on right now is from my understanding an entire valley-wide traffic study that was conducted by AutoZone in Oakview Yeah, I understand that they're actually suing the county to overturn the entire Ojai area plan so that commercial businesses in the Ojai Valley no longer require a traffic survey in order for their business to be considered to go in or not.

I'm confirming that that lawsuit, we're at that point with the county. But that is my understanding and it should be shocking to all of you just like I'm seeing on your face Rachel because I have brought this before the city nothing has been done. I just got cursed out by Matt Levere at the last MAC meeting where the Highway Patrol was present. It would've been lovely if he would have been there.

But I had Matt Levere seriously curse at me in that meeting and the reason why is we just had a guy from Oakview, a normal husband guy going to meet his wife at Sakura and Ojai crashes on a motorcycle. He has no recollection he's a family guy. I got this two phone calls hey Tina somebody called they want me to tell you about this accident He crashed right by your house. He was a normal husband man that said, hey I'll meet you over here. He doesn't know if he got run off the road where the truckers live and somebody went over the lane. He doesn't know if he accidentally hit some gravel but that man first of all he's doing property damage He's almost taking out their water tank. He is doing damage, not of his fault right?

A legal problem that is caused by Ojai. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:10:25

Thank You Tina.

4:10 – 4:2621 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:10:30

Let me know what you find out about what's going on with that litigation.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:10:34

I will. Yes, please do. Thank you, Tina. Next we have Delaney Labar and then Doug Labar.

CommentDoug LabarProposed · by introduction4:10:46

Good evening, Delaney Labar. I live up the street. I thought the Green Coalition was starting in the evening so I was going to tell you that coincidentally it was at the Green Coalition's World Cafes that they were doing about imagining Ojai and what changes and improvements we might like that it was Doug who actually proposed the, I mean I'm sure other people may have but in that context he proposed the 25 mile an hour. And the reason is he and I have a property up in a little town called Port Townsend Washington And so we're up there a lot and they have a citywide 25 mile an hour. And when you first get into town, it's like takes you a little while to make that adjustment because you're still going fast. You wanting to get to your hotel or whatever you know you're up to but what happens is I'm not a really patient person in my life, and yet I find that really within just a matter of hours, I've completely decompressed and relaxed.

And it affects my entire time there. It affects the way I conduct business, the way I do socializing. All of that gets impacted by that, and it is so lovely because the sense of relaxation It just extends everywhere. It also protects the deer up there, which they run the show up there over everybody's lawns and everything so they don't want to have deer accidents.

We don't have that problem unfortunately. But Port Townsend is very similar to Ojai. It's a small town. Port Townsend is to Seattle what Ojai is to L.A., and the streets, it's 100-year old to 150-year old towns so the streets are They don't all have sidewalks. In fact, you know really that's just in the most commercial part of town everywhere else there's no sidewalks and lots of kids and dogs.

Pedestrians and bicycles share the road, just like they do here. It's natural traffic calming. You don't have to do bull belts and all of that expensive stuff. It just naturally slows everybody down. I'm on Blanche here. We have a sidewalk on one side of the street and not on our side of the street, and it works just fine. People, I mean drivers automatically know to slow down when there are people in the street It's not, you know, they're not in the middle of the street. They're on the sides. Everybody knows.

So I just wanted to say and also we have situations where cars are really racing from one spot to another and this would slow that down so people will complain. They always do. Especially when there's change, but I say if we make it safer and calmer. We actually are Who we say we are and I'll end with the bumper sticker. I saw last week which was great that said Don't try to change Ohai let Ohai change you

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:14:22

Thank You Delaney next we have Doug Labar

CommentDoug LabarProposedself-stated4:14:31

Well, she just stole my thunder. I'm Doug Labar, resident of the City of Hawaii and I really hope that this issue doesn't get passed on to traffic engineers and public works. Just pass something. I've spent a fair amount of time in a small community in the shadow of the Olympic Mountains in the state of Washington. It has a population of a little over 10,000 residents and is located about two hours from the big urban city of Seattle.

Its name is Port Townsend. The reason I spend time there is because of how I feel when I'm there The pace is slow. The feeling is relief of stress. It is beautiful, uncrowded and peaceful. It has a striking architecture in the town center and it has a lot of well attended public events throughout the year. The speed limit is 25 miles per hour throughout the entire town I learned this at a cost.

But I came to realize that the town wide speed limit is an essential part of what makes it so desirable to spend time there. Actually, the speed limit through the town center is 15 miles per hour. But also throughout the residential areas at 25 miles per hour, one has time to observe the comings and goings of life in a slowed down community. Bicycle lanes are common.

Walking is popular and safer. And deer walk freely about undisturbed by drivers. It is a place to unwind from the frantic pace of Seattle. I cannot help but draw a parallel to the proximity of Ojai to the big urban city of Los Angeles, for most of our visitors come from L.A., so I suggest that we make a bold change city-wide. Let's give those visitors Visiting Ojai the very thing they came here for and the residents as well Slowed down the speed everyone is accustomed to moving at And to experience the nurturing that the nest can give them after all Isn't that why we're here?

And why they come here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:17:29

Yeah, thank you Doug Did you send this as a public comment yet I would like a copy of what you just read. So, I'm asking if you send it as a... But can you also send it? I'm gonna ask Delaney to send it by email and I encourage you to send it as a letter to the editor. It's wonderful. Thank you.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:17:52

Any comments online Weston?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:17:53

Yes mayor and to the public that material received at the dais I'll include that with our written public comments posted online We have written Okay Thank You Weston we have Renee Renee you have the floor

CommentRenee ReneeProposed4:18:09

Hi, can you hear me now?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:18:10

Yes.

CommentRenee ReneeProposed4:18:11

Okay thank you. Um yes um thank you very much everybody for putting this on the agenda uh Doug and Delaney that was beautifully said I really appreciate this idea that we can make Ojai a destination and stand for something Our residents, something that we can all be proud of when people come to Ojai they can breathe. Take a big breath and say you've arrived you're here you can slow down now.

And I think it's we've talked about this for years and years on the complete streets committee with Kathy, there's been many. Kathy Nolan was looking at how we could develop a campaign where everybody could get behind this. It's really in everybody's best interest to learn how to slow down. I've been doing it intentionally as I drive down the highway and I've actually had people, it's so rude, people who will pass me in the middle lane Just go zipping by me as if they can make a statement. I can go faster than you, you old pokey lady and it's so rude. It's so insulting and I just think we need to stand for something in a really big way and this is the way to do it. I really appreciate this being on the agenda Thank you, Mark Scott. I'm sorry that you're not here to see this or be a part of this but this really could make a big difference in all of our lives with bicycles and pedestrian safety etc., etc.

So thank you. I hope you pass this tonight. I am not sure about all the studies. You guys can figure that out. Thank you very much.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:20:09

Thank you, Renee. That's it Weston? Okay we will move on to discussion who would like to begin?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:20:15

I'll make a motion. I'd like to make a motion that we retain the services of a consulting traffic engineer to work with Public Works and Police Sheriff staff to identify streets eligible for these reductions to prepare specific recommendation for implementation to the City Council As well as an appropriate community outreach plan, if there is time and effort to do that. That can be a phase two.

Identify additional signage that should be installed concurrent with establishing these new speed limits and prepare community Pride campaign that supports and connects as public safety issue initiative. I think that those Can be phase two. Yeah, exactly just really hire the traffic engineer and get this moving Is there

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:21:11

a second I would second it okay, but you're gonna make a friendly amendment yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:21:16

can we work this so that it's clear that that the goal is a 25 mile per hour citywide without exception or less. The narrow streets like Arbolada, you know where it's appropriate? The reason and I mean I can the rationale is to make sure there's no confusion when you're in the city limit that's the speed limit and that will try very hard to get that done on Grand Avenue Because that's, Grand Avenue in a way sets the tone because they're already going to, if they go 25 and then they turn into residential streets they're already used to it. So hopefully that will have a calming effect but that's if council is agreeable that that's the goal you know? And we have all these great, what do you call that?

Slogans. 20 is plenty 25 saves lives and I know that Jamie from the chamber he'll help promote it you know on the chamber website And then I wanted to make a comment about the, you know, I wanna go back to Tina Brahma because my heart goes out to all the residents on Creek Road. We've been trying to get the county to calm the traffic there for the last eight years since 20, I think it was 2016, 2017 I went with her to the county and we're trying, we're not gonna give up But, you know ideally this would be valley-wide. It would be highly controversial I'm sure all the people You know, but the fact is on Creek Road Bears been killed a cougar was killed in Oakview, you know We have so few deer are killed and on Creek Road and those are the larger animals tons of small animals are killed on our streets every single day both wild and domestic And I can't even begin to tell you the stories.

If I've been going faster than 25, things that I would have killed that I didn't kill, including a whole family of quail crossing the street. I could see them on Creek Road and I thought what the heck is that? They're so little and the mother and the father were gonna sacrifice their life. It was so moving. I stopped my car and thankfully nobody was behind me They crossed but if I've been going any faster, I would have killed the whole bunch probably so yeah There's so many reasons to do this

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:23:56

Yes agreed. Well, thank you Councilmember women's you want to say something?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:24:01

Yeah, I Think that Tina made an important point and that is that if we don't I Combine the traffic The speed reduction with actual traffic enforcement,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:24:21

yes

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:24:22

then We're not going to be effective and If you want to get everybody to get you know we're gonna have to invest some money in it You know maybe Somebody can give us recommendations about how to do that. How do you best get the message out to the community, to go slower? I've also experienced the thing where I'm on a residential street and going 20 miles per hour to be respectful and someone passes me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:24:59

Yes,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:24:59

yes so There is you know part of this Mark added item 4 to this list I mean we need to, I think we do need to do a certain amount of public service communications about being polite to your neighbors especially when you're driving through their neighborhoods. Betsy and I met with Mark and with a whole bunch of neighbors from the Quiama Which has become What Creek Road Secondary if they're not if they're not avoiding Ojai Avenue to go on Creek Road. They're avoiding it by going on Quiama And actually there's other streets. Well, we're just going to continue dealing with that so it's kind of a community-wide thing. I agree 100% with what Delaney and Doug said that it would be nice if we could kind of develop a culture Going slower, but we do have to have the engineer tell us that it's safe to do it and then and then we can do it.

4:26 – 4:3526 turns

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:26:31

Sounds like we all agree that we all agree. We all want slow high. That's what I was just going to say. We could have a bumper sticker. Slow high. All right well you have a motion and we have a second so could we have the roll call please Weston?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:26:44

Yes and I did see consensus for that amendment to include.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:26:49

The goal is 25 citywide as noted to include an assessment of enforcement.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion and we have a second so could we have the roll call please Weston? Yes and I did see consensus for that amendment to include. The goa
Show transcript
Great, thank you. Roll call. Councilmember Whitman? Yes. Council Member Lange? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Francine? Yes Council Member Ruhl? Yes.
ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:27:08

Motion passes 5-0. And that's five motions, 5- 0. Wow! It might be a record. That is pretty impressive. So many applicants. Well thank you for being here and we will move on to councilmember reports. Any councilmembers have anything to report? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:27:27

can never remember.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:27:30

Well, I would just big shout out to the film festival it was a really beautiful event and those who were able to attend and a lot of work and a lot of thought went into that. I attended the Help of Ojai annual board meeting in luncheon last week and it's just so impressive the amount of work and service that they provide for our community. So very heartwarming.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:27:57

Do you want to discuss the request for this ordinance?

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:28:02

Okay, yeah. No got that okay, so we're let's go to City Manager's report anything to hear it. Thank You to the Sheriff's

CommentMarissa GonzalezProposed4:28:09

Department for hosting a great Emergency preparedness meeting with our city staff to get everyone up to speed. The mayor was there and I was impressed She carries a gavel wherever she goes well to call it to order

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:28:27

mayor on the go

CommentMarissa GonzalezProposed4:28:30

To the council look forward to working with you closely in the next few weeks at a minimum Also, it's it has been great to be here working both with James and with mark It's been maybe 15 years since I got to work with Mark when he was in Burbank But a legend in the profession, so I enjoyed the time that I got to have with him here. As I'm sure you all know, the city staff is small.

I think as coming in this morning, you can hardly see through the door. There are so many notices on the front window. But I was looking and we had five public meetings in four days this week. So that is just a lot of work there including the day-to-day things and the follow up that comes out of those meetings but the staff across the board I met with in the different departments They're really all in, and I look forward to working more closely with them.

So a great team and echo the county. I've always been impressed with County Fire and Sheriff's Department, the resources that they have to offer us and the knowledge base they have there. They've been a pleasure to work with as well. And ditto for Matt and his firm.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:29:46

Thank you for being here Carl, yeah

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:29:48

All right, let's look at a future agenda items, okay So I

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:29:52

I

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:29:52

do

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:29:52

want to I want to come back

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:29:54

with this resident with this

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:29:55

resolution But I would like to take it a step further You know I have mentioned that I am very interested in adding a future agenda item of making a peace commission or a peace committee, and I know that's not realistic and I haven't had a lot of support for that. So what I would like to propose instead is I will be happy to do all the legwork on two different things that ideally a peace committee would do.

One, I'd like to come back with working with staff on a revised version of this taking it to the next level so that we have a peace policy. Something that we want to respond to. We have a protocol to follow As a discussion, I would like to bring back a discussion point and some language for that And I'd love to do that within the next two weeks before the next meeting if there is support for that so that we can respond to the the I would like to do some of the heavy lifting on that. Two, I would also like to come back sooner rather than later With an ethics protocol or with some gen some basic language to bring back a discussion for a code of ethics For the council and for staff I've looked at some other cities language for what they'd what they've what their what it what others are doing I think it's really important in light of everything that's going on.

I think it's really important for keeping the peace On this dais, so I'd like to bring this back within the next two weeks If staff if I can work with staff to do that and if my fellow council members would trust me to do that And then I'd also like to work on the bring back the ethics a discussion on ethics on an ethics policy

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:32:27

So I am in favor of us saying something as a city about death and violence that we've been experiencing. Have concerns that whatever we say, we incorporate people like what Larry Steingold had to say.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:32:58

100%.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:32:59

What Ray Powers had to say. It seems like there's a way to say it where you're not excluding anybody's viewpoint because We may, people will disagree about you know who's right and who's wrong or whatever else but I think probably everybody agrees that people should stop dying. Killing and dying. So I think it's a really difficult task for you to thread that needle, but I'm sure you're the right person to do it.

But good luck if you feel free to talk to me if you're in but certainly talk to other community members about

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:33:56

Yes,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:33:57

how to say it in the right way.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:33:58

Mm-hmm I would love to I would love to for anyone who spoke tonight to you know to talk with them as well But I agree with you You know to Larry's point this this isn't we're not and to raise point We're not I think when we need to make a statement of who we are is a city of peace And any killing of innocent lives and children especially. We just, we have to...we can't sit back and watch that happen.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:34:31

Council Member Burrell.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:34:32

Yeah, I don't want to really expand this out because I realize that it's there it's really time sensitive. I mean you know as people noted you know it's death is you know it's minute by minute and But what do you think about having some sort of workshop where, it's a community conversation but we move forward. We have that community conversation and I don't know whether it's you prep a document of some sort- That's what my plan was. And then we go into a community conversation and then we move.

4:35 – 4:4329 turns

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:35:15

That was my plan. My plan wasn't to draft an ordinance, it was to draft enough of something to where we can have a discussion and move forward in a public hearing.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:35:26

Yeah, and I think sooner. I mean, I would be willing to... You know, I like my time not here but I'd be willing to come here at the earliest convenience to have this conversation and to move this forward because I think as we heard from The folks, you know their hearts are breaking and people are dying. And so as our community We should be I think we should be moving as quickly as we possibly can

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:35:56

and I'm happy to have a special meeting as well I didn't I didn't I didn't push it because next week's Thanksgiving and I And we have a lot going on in the city right now and we're very short on staff. I didn't push it, but if my fellow council members want to do a special meeting, I'd be very happy with that decision.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:36:19

When were you thinking? Wait

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:36:21

just one second. Next week at some point? I mean next week's Thanksgiving so I don't know if that's... I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:36:28

think if we can get this resolution Let's start there. It's already written and adopted at the next meeting, that would be the Tuesday after Thanksgiving and the fourth Tuesday.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:36:41

Yes I mean

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:36:45

are you thinking of something simple that we if Matt is available that we just whatever the council wants will make happen. We already have on the books a meeting for the 28th.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:37:06

That may provide the time for the conversations to look at the language between now and then, that may be

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.874:37:10

wise. It's time in three quarters if he has to work on Thanksgiving.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:37:16

And I'd like to thank Councilmember Lange for jumping in there and working on this and also so many members of our community for showing up and speaking out for peace and peace is a practice it's an everyday practice so thank you all for representing that and the whole you know you all spoke so beautifully You know about the radical empathy and That we just need to we need to stand up as a city of peace. So thank you all

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:37:47

And how do you all feel about the ethics the code of ethics as a discussion point? Looking at some samples

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:37:54

Are you thinking that you could fit that in We have some time sensitive things like the pickleball MOU runs out December 31st. We have to get that on there. Are you received? Yeah, you are I saw your name so yeah.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:38:27

I would say pickleball is not, but whatever. I know it's time sensitive to a few people relative to the kinds of things that we're talking about. We have been talking about an ethics workshop and the fact that we have to prioritize that. We have to be really clear. We've been talking about that since our first meeting. And to me it has to happen. You know, I don't so I would say that was a very high

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:39:00

priority Okay, well

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:39:05

we have a I'm pretty sure we have us pretty full agenda for the 28th so can we The peace

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:39:11

resolution however it will come out of that process for the 28th as discussed. The ethics workshop proposal to then develop, for then council to approve and go from there. That strikes me as a December meeting item giving staff time to sit down and work with Councilman Lange and anyone else I don't know what that looks like. And then, I'm not sure about the pickleball item timing.

The MOU expiring doesn't trigger anything. That can just expire? It doesn't require us to do anything to extend it. On city property.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:39:54

But it opens us up for potential litigation with the residents, the neighbors.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:40:02

If they choose to sue us. I mean it's a threat of litigation we can go into closed session but I mean it doesn't open us up to litigation any more than I mean, you know anybody can sue

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:40:17

us. Let's defer to our Newly new acting city manager on the timing on pickleball But certainly I think everyone understands that sooner or later that has to be resolved And I know there were discussions just on Monday mark was in a meeting with the county on that one So I'm aware of that meeting he had he was he left us information about it so it's in process and

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:40:41

Okay,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:40:41

all right. Well, thank you. I would like to put back on the agenda recording closed sessions. I would like to revisit that for various reasons. So that and also I would like, we've talked about having the 2-2 committee and getting that started. And we kind of said well it'd be better you know we can all meet together but you know both of the school. What's a 2- 2 committee?

For the school district. But I'm, you know, given that the holidays are coming and all of that and it doesn't look like we're going to be able to get all of the trustees and all of us together for a meeting, I would rather move forward with getting the 2-2 committee started and then working it so that we have A meeting with all of us. I mean we have right now on the books, we have an art commission meeting with us. We have a historic preservation committee meeting with us doesn't mean we need to prioritize those over a school trustee meeting, but I would like, I've been talking about this for months and months and months about getting the 2-2 committee together. And I would like to move that forward and not have it reliant upon us first meeting with them because I don't see what the point is to make that happen before a 2-1 honestly.

Because that's going to take a while. We're already booked up through December and January, so I would rather have the 2-2 start. That's the normal thing.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:42:33

There's only two meetings left. No, no,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:42:35

the 2-2 does... The two of us meet with two of them. It has nothing to do with the

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:42:41

council. Have we reached out to the school board about a joint meeting that we agreed upon doing? I have not asked. Could we please do that?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:42:54

We could always put an item at an upcoming meeting for the council to pick the two who would be our two That's the piece that we would need to do with the council level is who are two and then go make the invite. In the meantime, Carl can make contact with me.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.864:43:08

Yeah, I would like I would like to do that. I think that I would like to get that going because I have been talking about it since February. And it is now almost December.

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:43:22

All

CommentMarissa GonzalezProposed4:43:22

right. Well, I could clarify one of the ethics protocol slash workshop Special meeting there are groups that do that That we can bring in but is that something you'd want to invite commissioners to as well or would that just be council?

4:43 – 4:444 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposed · by role4:43:41

To avoid debating something not on the agenda I think it's a great question that I would suggest Council consider at a future meeting Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:43:53

Microphone, please.

ElectedRachel LangCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.844:43:54

I think if we bring it for discussion Then we can yeah. Yeah, I think so. Yes agree with Okay, all

ElectedBetsy StixMayorProposed · by role4:44:06

right well on that note I think we're set yes, mr. City attorney, okay All right. Well, thank you all for a productive meeting and we are adjourned